rivaroxaban and Renal-Insufficiency--Chronic

Anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ARN) is a novel and not well-studied cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). The prevalence of ARN varies significantly between studies and is estimated at 20% in patients treated with warfarin. Patients with ARN have a significantly higher mortality risk and an increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Unexplained AKI with hematuria are clinical manifestations of ARN. In most cases, ARN is diagnosed within the first 2 months of anticoagulant therapy, but later ARN occurrence is possible. Among the studied anticoagulants, most data concern warfarin toxicity, whereas cases of ARN caused by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have also been presented. Tubular obstruction by red blood cell casts or hemoglobin and iron tubular toxicity are the postulated mechanisms of ARN. On the molecular level, the inhibition of thrombin and protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1), leading to endothelial susceptibility to damage or abnormal protein C endothelial signaling, is suggested to contribute to ARN. Older age, impaired kidney function, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus are the main risk factors for ARN, but their significance may differ between anticoagulants. From therapeutic options, the withdrawal of the anticoagulant and the administration of its antidote, as well as corticosteroids or N-acetylcysteine, are proposed. Since the number of patients with kidney diseases on anticoagulants increases, and DOACs are starting to be more useful in this group of patients, we aim to summarize the pathogenesis, clinical picture and possible ways of treatment of DOAC-induced ARN.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Chronic kidney disease is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with heightened risks of stroke/systemic embolisation and bleeding. In this review we outline the evidence for AF stroke prevention in kidney disease, identify current knowledge gaps, and give recommendations for anticoagulation at various stages of chronic kidney disease. Overall, anticoagulation is underused. Warfarin use becomes increasingly difficult with advancing kidney disease, with difficulty maintaining international normalised ratio (INR) in therapeutic range, increased risk of intracranial and fatal bleeding compared to non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and high rates of discontinuation. Similarly, the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran is not recommended as it is predominantly renally excreted with consequent increased plasma levels and bleeding risk with advanced kidney disease. The Factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban have less renal excretion (25-35%), modest increases in plasma levels with advancing kidney disease, and are the preferred first line choice for anticoagulation in moderate kidney disease based on strong evidence from randomised clinical trials (RCTs). In severe kidney disease there is a paucity of RCT data, but extrapolation of the pharmacokinetic and RCT data for moderate kidney disease, and observational studies, support the considered use of dose-adjusted Factor Xa inhibitors unless the bleeding risk is prohibitive. In Australia, apixaban is approved for creatinine clearance down to 25 mL/min, and rivaroxaban down to 15 mL/min. For end-stage kidney disease warfarin is the only agent approved, but we recommend against anticoagulation (except in selected cases) due to high bleeding risk, multiple co-morbidities, and questionable benefit.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

To evaluate how treatment with DOACs for VTE affects thrombosis and bleeding outcomes compared to warfarin in CKD and dialysis patients.. A literature search was conducted for studies evaluating VTE and bleeding outcomes with DOAC use in CKD and dialysis patients. Searches conducted through EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception to September 22, 2020.. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series with ≥10 patients included.. From 7286 studies, nine studies met inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference between DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) and warfarin for reducing recurrent VTE and bleeding events in moderate CKD patients. The risk of overall major bleeding increased when the degree of kidney impairment increased. There was no significant difference between apixaban and warfarin for VTE outcomes in dialysis patients.. There continues to be a controversial debate whether it may be more beneficial to use DOACs versus warfarin in CKD/dialysis patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). The risk vs benefit of using DOACs in the CKD/ESKD population should continue to be evaluated for each individual patient.. Apixaban may be used cautiously as an alternative in acute VTE treatment in severe CKD patients. Insufficient evidence is available to suggest the use of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in this patient population. The benefit of using DOACs in this population for VTE treatment should be weighed against the potential bleeding risk in patients with CKD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Anticoagulant treatment in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) or on dialysis remains a matter of debate. The object of this study was to quantify the benefit-risk profiles of rivaroxaban or apixaban versus warfarin in AF patients with stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis.. A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar databases was performed for eligible studies that comparing the effect and safety of rivaroxaban or apixaban versus warfarin in AF patients with stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were abstracted, and then pooled using a random-effects model.. A total of seven studies, one post hoc analysis of RCT and six observational cohorts, were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with warfarin use, the use of rivaroxaban or apixaban was significantly associated with reduced risks of all-cause death (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.93) and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95). There were no significant differences in the risks of stroke or systemic embolism (rivaroxaban, HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.43-1.19; apixaban, HR = 0.86, 95%CI 0.68-1.09) and major bleeding (rivaroxaban, HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.64-1.45; apixaban, HR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.28-1.12).. Current evidence suggests that rivaroxaban or apixaban are safe and at least as effective as warfarin in patients with AF and stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Acuity; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Stroke in patients with CKD and AF is frequent, and is usually more severe than in the absence of CKD. Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend oral anticoagulant therapy in order to reduce thromboembolic risk in AF patients in general, and also in the presence of CKD, excluding however stage 4 and dialysis (stage 5) patients. Warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists are still the most frequently used drugs in these settings, despite the high bleeding risk. In the United States, the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, especially apixaban, are here used off-label, despite the absence of strong evidences of efficacy and safety. Several clinical trials are ongoing, and further evidence is needed before non-vitamin K antagonists can be recommended in these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Diabetes Complications; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Off-Label Use; Prevalence; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

Oral anticoagulants are commonly prescribed in patients with kidney diseases having atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk. It is very important to understand their clinical pharmacology and changes that may occur as GFR declines. Risks and benefits of newer oral anticoagulants are different in patients with CKD and patients with ESRD. Patients with GFR < 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, including those on dialysis, were systematically excluded from landmark trials. All of the NOACs are dependent on renal clearance to some degree and so the risk of NOAC associated bleeding may be expected to be greater in patients with renal failure. Apixaban may be at least as safe as (or possibly safer than) warfarin in individuals with ESRD. Until more data become available, use of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban in patients with CKD stage 5 and ESRD is not indicated. Available strategies for reversing the anticoagulant effect of NOAC are - specific reversal agents available for dabigatran (idarucizumab) and for the oral direct factor Xa inhibitors - andexanet alfa, antifibrinolytic agents, DDAVP and prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs). In this review clinical and pharmacological aspects of newer oral anticoagulants in the setting of chronic kidney disease will be discussed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban

There is a lack of clear benefit and a potential risk of bleeding with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. The objective of this study was to evaluate how treatment with DOACs affects stroke and bleeding outcomes compared with warfarin or aspirin.. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and case series, and searched electronic databases from 1946 to 2017. Studies evaluating stroke and bleeding outcomes with DOAC use in CKD and dialysis patients were included.. From 8008 studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria. For moderate CKD patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate  <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), there was no difference in stroke outcomes between dabigatran 110 mg [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.51-1.21], rivaroxaban (HR 0.82-0.84, 95% CI 0.25-2.69) and edoxaban (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65-1.18) versus warfarin. Dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) and apixaban reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism significantly more than warfarin for moderate CKD patients (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.89 and HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94, respectively). Edoxaban and apixaban were associated with reduced major bleeding events (HR 0.50-0.76) compared with warfarin. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg showed no significant difference in major bleeding versus warfarin. In hemodialysis (HD) patients, there was no difference in stroke outcomes between apixaban, dabigatran [relative risk (RR) 1.71, 95% CI 0.97-2.99] or rivaroxaban (RR 1.8, 95% CI 0.89-3.64) versus warfarin. In HD patients, rivaroxaban and dabigatran were associated with an increased major bleeding risk (RR 1.45-1.76), whereas there was no major bleeding difference with apixaban compared to warfarin.. The heterogeneity of major bleeding and stroke definitions of the 10 included studies.. Clinicians should continue to weigh the risk of stroke versus bleeding before prescribing DOACs in the CKD and dialysis population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Oral anticoagulants are commonly used drugs in patients with CKD and patients with ESKD to treat atrial fibrillation to reduce stroke and systemic embolism. Some of these drugs are used to treat or prevent deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with CKD who undergo knee and hip replacement surgeries. Warfarin is the only anticoagulant that is approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration in individuals with mechanical heart valves. Each oral anticoagulant affects the coagulation profile in the laboratory uniquely. Warfarin and apixaban are the only anticoagulants that are Food and Drug Administration approved for use in patients with CKD and patients with ESKD. However, other oral anticoagulants are commonly used off label in this patient population. Given the acquired risk of bleeding from uremia, these drugs are known to cause increased bleeding events, hospitalization, and overall morbidity. Each anticoagulant has unique pharmacologic properties of which nephrologists need to be aware to optimally manage patients. In addition, nephrologists are increasingly asked to aid in the management of adverse bleeding events related to oral anticoagulant use in patients with CKD and patients with ESKD. This article summarizes the clinical pharmacology of these drugs and identifies knowledge gaps in the literature related to their use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of atrial fibrillation, stroke, and bleeding posing unique clinical challenges. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have become recognized as alternative therapy to Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) regarding the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and reduce the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation. However, the understanding of NOACs in CKD is still underdeveloped. This review summarizes recent literature on the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with CKD.. Studies focusing on patients with moderate kidney disease were drawn from post hoc analyses from three major NOAC trials, meta-analyses, and postmarketing surveillance studies. Cumulatively, these studies continue to demonstrate NOACs as equivalent if not superior therapies to VKAs in regards to both efficacy and safety. These studies are limited by small sample sizes as well as a lack of direct comparison between NOACs.. The role of NOACs in managing VTE and atrial fibrillation is increasing. Current research suggests that NOACs are at least as efficacious and well tolerated as VKAs. More research is required to elucidate which NOAC is preferable in the clinical setting.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

Management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a complex conundrum because of higher risks for both thromboembolic and bleeding complications compared to the general population. This makes it particularly important for clinicians to carefully weigh the risks versus benefits of anticoagulation therapy to determine the individualized net clinical benefit for every patient. During the past few years, 4 non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant (NOAC) agents have supplemented warfarin in the therapeutic armamentarium for the prevention of systemic thromboembolism in nonvalvular AF. However, the use of NOACs in CKD specifically mandates a nuanced understanding due to their varying dependence on renal clearance, with resultant safety implications related to either underdosing (thromboembolism) or excessive drug exposure (bleeding). This pragmatic review highlights unique considerations pertaining to accurate estimation and temporal monitoring of kidney function in the context of NOAC use with specific clinical deliberations and variables when determining whether an NOAC is appropriate for a patient with CKD. The dependence of NOACs on renal clearance and several troubling safety signals in the published literature suggest that it is vital for nephrologists to be active members of a multidisciplinary team caring for these high-risk patients with CKD and AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cyclophosphamide; Dabigatran; Diabetes Mellitus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Multimorbidity; Obesity; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism

Atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs approximately in 3% of general population, with greater prevalence in elderly. Non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) according to the current European guidelines are recommended for patients with AF at high risk for stroke as a first-choice treatment. NOACs are not inferior to warfarin or some of them are better than warfarin in reducing the rate of ischemic stroke. Moreover, they significantly reduce the rate of intracranial hemorrhages, major bleedings, and mortality compared with warfarin. Nevertheless according to ESC guidelines, NOACs are not recommended in patients with creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min. Observational studies provide contradictive data. Only few new trials are ongoing. Therefore, it is not clear if NOACs should be in the future prescribed to patients with advanced CKD and those on dialysis. Moreover, the risk of stroke and bleeding is much higher in such population than in patients without end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The authors provide data on pros and cons of use of NOACs in ESRD patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). As in the general population, in CKD patients AF is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism and stroke. However, CKD patients, especially those on renal replacement therapy (RRT), also exhibit an increased risk of bleeding, especially from the gastrointestinal tract. Oral anticoagulation is the most effective form of thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF presenting increased risk of stroke. Limited evidence on efficacy, the increased risk of bleeding as well as some concern regarding the use of warfarin in CKD, has often resulted in the underuse of anticoagulation CKD patients. A large body of evidence suggests that non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) significantly reduce the risk of stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin in normal renal function subjects. Hence, they are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. However, NOACs metabolism is largely dependent on the kidneys for elimination and little is known in patients with creatinine clearance <25ml/min who were excluded from all pivotal phase 3 NOACs trials. This review focuses on the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance 15-49ml/min) and those on dialysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Anticoagulation in patients with impaired kidney function can be challenging since drugs' pharmacokinetics and bioavailability are altered in this setting. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) treated with conventional anticoagulant agents [vitamin K antagonist (VKA), low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH)] are at high risk of bleeding events (both non-major and major clinically relevant bleeding). While anticoagulation reduces the risk of thromboembolic events, the co-existing bleeding risk and the fact that the most commonly used anticoagulation agents are eliminated via the kidneys pose additional challenges. More recently, two classes of direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) have been investigated for the prevention and management of venous thromboembolic events: the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. In this review, we discuss the complex challenges and the practical considerations associated with the management of anticoagulation treatment in patients with CKD, with a special focus on DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Vitamin K

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), which is more prevalent among CKD patients than the general population. AF causes stroke or systemic embolism, leading to increased mortality. The conventional antithrombotic prophylaxis agent warfarin is often prescribed for the prevention of stroke, but risk of bleeding necessitates regular therapeutic monitoring. Recently developed direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are expected to be useful as alternatives to warfarin.. To assess the efficacy and safety of DOAC including apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin among AF patients with CKD.. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register (up to 1 August 2017) through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Specialised Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (direct thrombin inhibitors or factor Xa inhibitors) with dose-adjusted warfarin for preventing stroke and systemic embolic events in non-valvular AF patients with CKD, defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl) or eGFR between 15 and 60 mL/min (CKD stage G3 and G4).. Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed quality, and extracted data. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between anticoagulant therapy and all strokes and systemic embolic events as the primary efficacy outcome and major bleeding events as the primary safety outcome. Confidence in the evidence was assessing using GRADE.. Our review included 12,545 AF participants with CKD from five studies. All participants were randomised to either DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) or dose-adjusted warfarin. Four studies used a central, interactive, automated response system for allocation concealment while the other did not specify concealment methods. Four studies were blinded while the other was partially open-label. However, given that all studies involved blinded evaluation of outcome events, we considered the risk of bias to be low. We were unable to create funnel plots due to the small number of studies, thwarting assessment of publication bias. Study duration ranged from 1.8 to 2.8 years. The large majority of participants included in this study were CKD stage G3 (12,155), and a small number were stage G4 (390). Of 12,545 participants from five studies, a total of 321 cases (2.56%) of the primary efficacy outcome occurred per year. Further, of 12,521 participants from five studies, a total of 617 cases (4.93%) of the primary safety outcome occurred per year. DOAC appeared to probably reduce the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism events (5 studies, 12,545 participants: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.00; moderate certainty evidence) and to slightly reduce the incidence of major bleeding events (5 studies, 12,521 participants: RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.04; low certainty evidence) in comparison with warfarin.. Our findings indicate that DOAC are as likely as warfarin to prevent all strokes and systemic embolic events without increasing risk of major bleeding events among AF patients with kidney impairment. These findings should encourage physicians to prescribe DOAC in AF patients with CKD without fear of bleeding. The major limitation is that the results of this study chiefly reflect CKD stage G3. Application of the results to CKD stage G4 patients requires additional investigation. Furthermore, we could not assess CKD stage G5 patients. Future reviews should assess participants at more advanced CKD stages. Additionally, we could not conduct detailed analyses of subgroups and sensitivity analyses due to lack of data.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Humans; Outpatients; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Nonvitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. As a group, NOACs significantly reduce stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with warfarin. All NOACs are dependent on the kidney for elimination, such that patients with creatinine clearance <25 ml/min were excluded from all the pivotal phase 3 NOAC trials. It therefore remains unclear how or if NOACs should be prescribed to patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and those on dialysis. The authors review the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min) and those on dialysis. The authors frame the evidence in terms of risk versus benefit to bring greater clarity to NOAC-related major bleeding and efficacy at preventing stroke specifically in patients with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dabigatran; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation is a common finding in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which increases markedly the embolism risk. The CHADS2 and HAS-BLED scales, used in the general population to assess the risk/benefit of oral anticoagulation (OAC), underestimate respectively the risk of embolism and haemorrhage in CKD, making it difficult to decide whether to use OAC or not. Based on the available evidence, it seems indicated to use OAC in stage 3 CKD, while it is controversial in advanced stages. New OAC such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been approved in stage 3 CKD but their role is still somewhat uncertain.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexist, and data suggest that renal patients have AF rates in excess of double that encountered in the general population. These patients are at increased risk of stroke, regardless of the presence or absence of AF. Furthermore, a lower GFR causes increased thromboembolic risk in patients with AF - independent of other risk factors. The dilemma facing clinicians treating this cohort of patients is that renal insufficiency confers both a thromboembolic and a bleeding risk. Renal disease also commonly coexists with other risk factors for stroke and bleeding such as hypertension and advanced age. Furthermore, bleeding risk tracks stroke risk and many risk factors are common to both thromboembolism and haemorrhage. Patients with severe renal impairment are also actively excluded from the majority of trials for stroke prevention in AF, including those trials which informed the development of stroke risk factor scoring schemes. Therefore, patients with renal disease and AF present a unique management challenge. The available data suggests that the benefit from warfarin in terms of stroke reduction is not as clear as in the general population, and there is an increased risk of bleeding complications and even ectopic vascular calcification. Thus, it is problematic to extrapolate the benefits of warfarin in the general population to a subgroup that has been actively excluded from clinical trials. The new oral anticoagulants have relatively little data in patients with severe renal impairment, and all have an element of renal excretion. There is a need for large randomised control trials in patients with renal insufficiency and on haemodialysis to provide a bank of high-quality scientific data on which clinicians can base their management decisions. Until then, we must adopt a pragmatic approach which involves careful consideration of the relative risk of stroke and bleeding in each individual patient.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Disease Management; Embolism; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Warfarin

Background Nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants require dose adjustment based on kidney function.The most common estimate of kidney function employed in clinical practice is estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); however, product monographs recommend the use of the Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) for dose adjustment. Methods and Results The authors included patients enrolled in the ORBIT-AF II (Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation AF II) trial. Dosing was considered inappropriate when use of eGFR resulted in a lower (undertreatment) or higher (overtreatment) dose than that recommended by the eCrCl. The primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular and neurological events was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke or systemic embolism, new-onset heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Among 8727 in the overall cohort, agreement between eCrCl and eGFR was observed in 93.5% to 93.8% of patients. Among 2184 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the agreement between eCrCl and eGFR was 79.9% to 80.7%. Dosing misclassification was more frequent in the CKD population (41.9% of rivaroxaban users, 5.7% of dabigatran users, and 4.6% apixaban users). At 1 year, undertreated patients in the CKD group had significantly greater major adverse cardiovascular and neurological events (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.93 [95% CI, 1.08-7.92]) compared with the group with appropriate nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants dosing (

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Low-dose rivaroxaban reduced major adverse cardiac and limb events among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASCVD) in the COMPASS trial. The objective of our study was to evaluate the eligibility and budgetary impact of the COMPASS trial in a real-world population.. The VA administrative and clinical databases were utilized to conduct a cross-sectional study to identify patients eligible for low-dose rivaroxaban receiving care at all 141 facilities between October 1, 2014 and September 30, 2015. Proportion of patients with stable ASCVD eligible for low-dose rivaroxaban and prevalence of multiple risk enrichment criteria among eligible patients. Pharmaceutical budgetary impact using VA pharmacy pricing. Chi-squared and Student's t tests were used to compare patients eligible versus ineligible patients.. From an initial cohort of 1,248,214 patients with ASCVD, 488,495 patients (39.1%) met trial eligibility criteria. Eligible patients were older (74.2 vs 64.5 years) with higher proportion of hypertension (84.1% vs 82.1%) and diabetes (46.2% vs 32.9) compared with ineligible patients (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). A median of 38.7% (IQR 4.6%) of total ASCVD patients per facility were rivaroxaban eligible. Estimated annual VA pharmacy budgetary impact would range from $0.47 billion to $1.88 billion for 25% to 100% treatment penetration. Annual facility level pharmaceutical budgetary impact would be a median of $12.3 million (IQR $8.0-$16.3 million) for treatment of all eligible patients. Among eligible patients, age greater than 65 years was the most common risk enrichment factor (86.9%). Prevalence of eligible patients with multiple enrichment factors varied from 34.2% (one factor) to 6.2% (four or more).. Over one third of patients with stable ASCVD may qualify for low-dose rivaroxaban within the VA. Additional studies are needed to understand eligibility in other populations and a formal cost-effectiveness analysis is warranted.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Budgets; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cigarette Smoking; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Health Expenditures; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; United States; United States Department of Veterans Affairs

In patients with normal renal function or early stage CKD, the risk-benefit profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is superior to that of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In patients on hemodialysis, the comparative efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs are unknown.. In the Valkyrie study, 132 patients on hemodialysis with atrial fibrillation were randomized to a VKA with a target INR of 2-3, 10 mg rivaroxaban daily, or rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 for 18 months. Patients continued the originally assigned treatment and follow-up was extended for at least an additional 18 months. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. Secondary efficacy end points were individual components of the composite outcome and all-cause death. Safety end points were life-threatening, major, and minor bleeding.. Median (IQR) follow-up was 1.88 (1.01-3.38) years. Premature, permanent discontinuation of anticoagulation occurred in 25% of patients. The primary end point occurred at a rate of 63.8 per 100 person-years in the VKA group, 26.2 per 100 person-years in the rivaroxaban group, and 21.4 per 100 person-years in the rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 group. The estimated competing risk-adjusted hazard ratio for the primary end point was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.68;. In patients on hemodialysis with atrial fibrillation, a reduced dose of rivaroxaban significantly decreased the composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and major bleeding complications compared with VKA.. Oral Anticoagulation in Hemodialysis, NCT03799822.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Mortality; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K; Vitamin K 2

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuminuria; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban

Chronic kidney disease is associated with an increased risk of both bleeding and ischemic cardiovascular events.. The purpose of this study was to determine the balance of risks and benefits from the dual pathway antithrombotic regimen (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily [bd] plus aspirin, compared with aspirin) in vascular patients with or without moderate renal dysfunction.. This was a secondary analysis of the COMPASS (Cardiovascular OutcoMes for People using Anticoagulation StrategieS) trial involving 27,395 patients with chronic coronary or peripheral artery disease.. In COMPASS, 21,111 patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at baseline of ≥60 ml/min, 6,276 had a GRF of <60 ml/min. Both the primary efficacy outcome (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and major bleeding were more frequent in those with renal dysfunction, and the frequency of these outcome events was inversely related to GFR. However, the primary outcome was consistently reduced with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg bd plus aspirin, irrespective of GFR category (GFR ≥60 ml/min, 3.5% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 4.5% aspirin alone, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64 to 0.90; GFR <60 ml/min, 6.4% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 8.4% aspirin alone, HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.94). Major bleeding was more frequent with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in those with GFR ≥60 ml/min (2.9% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 1.6% aspirin alone, HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.44 to 2.28) and similarly in those with GFR <60 ml/min (3.9% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 2.7% aspirin alone, HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.05 to 2.07).. The benefits of the dual pathway COMPASS regimen (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg bd plus aspirin), versus aspirin alone, are preserved in patients with moderate renal dysfunction without evidence of an excess hazard of bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Correlation of Data; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Adjustment; Rivaroxaban

The review shows the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), depending on the severity of the disease. Patients with non-valvular AF and CKD have a significantly increased risk of both bleeding and thromboembolic complications, and death from all causes. Evaluation of the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), meta-analyzes of RCTs demonstrated the advantages of the new oral anticoagulants (NOAC), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, compared with warfarin in reducing the risk of bleeding in patients with AF and CKD in predialysis stage. According to experimental and clinical studies, warfarin can promote renal vascular calcification. With the deterioration of filtration renal function during treatment with anticoagulants in patients with AF on the results of ROCKET AF study found that rivaroxaban is more preferable than warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism without increasing the risk of bleeding. The absence of RCT data complicates the choice of anticoagulant therapy in patients with CKD on hemodialysis, although the NOAC approved by the Office of Quality Control Food and Drug US drugs (FDA) for the use of patients in this category. According to the instruction drugs rivaroxaban and apixaban are allowed to use in patients with end-stage CKD with creatinine clearance not less than 15 ml/min.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Valves; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are indicated for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Although Food and Drug Administration labeling for DOACs uses estimated creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) equation, estimated glomerular filtration rate according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is often reported. The objectives of this study were to evaluate DOAC dosing discordance and to determine whether discordance based on various estimates of kidney function is associated with bleeding or thromboembolism. The study was an institutional review board approved retrospective analysis of patients at UPMC Presbyterian Hospital from January 1, 2010, to December 12, 2016. Data were obtained through electronic medical records. Adults who received a medication charge for rivaroxaban or dabigatran, had a diagnosis code for atrial fibrillation, and had a serum creatinine within 3 days of DOAC initiation were included. Doses were considered discordant if the calculated dose based on CKD-EPI did not match the patient's dose during index admission, if dosed correctly using C-G. Association of discordance with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and clinical outcomes was determined using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Rivaroxaban discordance was present among 49 of the 644 (8%) patients who were dosed correctly with C-G. Dabigatran discordance was present among 17 of the 590 (3%) patients who were dosed correctly. Discordance with rivaroxaban was found to increase the risk of thromboembolism when using CKD-EPI (odds ratio, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.02-7.79, P = .045) versus C-G. Our findings emphasize the need to dose DOACs, specifically rivaroxaban, appropriately in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Kidney; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) confers a high risk of thrombosis and bleeding. However, little evidence exists regarding the optimal choice of postoperative thromboprophylaxis in these patients. We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study among adults ≥66 years old with CKD undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty who had filled an outpatient prophylactic anticoagulant prescription between 2010 and 2020 in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcomes of venous thrombosis (VTE) and hemorrhage were identified by validated algorithms using relevant diagnoses and billing codes. Overlap-weighted cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) on the 90-day risk of VTE and hemorrhage compared with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). A total of 27  645 patients were prescribed DOAC (N = 22  943) or LMWH (N = 4702) after arthroplasty. Rivaroxaban was the predominant DOAC (94.5%), while LMWH mainly included enoxaparin (67%) and dalteparin (31.5%). DOAC users had higher eGFRs, fewer co-morbidities, and surgery in more recent years compared to LMWH users. After weighing, DOAC (compared with LMWH) was associated with a lower risk of VTE (DOAC: 1.5% vs. LMWH: 2.1%, weighted hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.94) and a higher risk of hemorrhage (DOAC: 1.3% vs. LMWH: 1.0%, weighted HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.04-1.99). Additional analyses including a more stringent VTE defining algorithm, different eGFR cut-offs, and limiting to rivaroxaban and enoxaparin showed consistent findings. Among elderly adults with CKD, DOAC was associated with a lower VTE risk and a higher hemorrhage risk compared to LMWH following hip or knee arthroplasty.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Ontario; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Today real word data (RWD) are playing a greater role in informing health care decisions. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK) and observed exposure-risk relationship predicted an increased bleeding risk induced by rivaroxaban (RXB) in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) taking concomitant medications that are combined Pgp-CYP3A inhibitors. In this commentary, we explore the potential use of RWD to assess the clinical consequence of this complex drug-drug interaction predicted from PBPK. This is a retrospective, case control, pilot study using a RWD dataset of 896,728 patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease and rivaroxaban use that was refined based upon combined Pgp-CYP3A inhibitor exposure and report of drug-induced bleeding (DIB). The odds ratio of patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease taking rivaroxaban with or without concurrent Pgp-CYP3A inhibitor use having a DIB was calculated. The odds ratio for DIB was 2.04 (CI

Topics: Computer Simulation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Humans; Models, Biological; Pilot Projects; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Evidence is needed on the impact of anticoagulation therapy on kidney function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective of this analysis, which is part of the CALLIPER study, was to investigate the risk of worsening kidney function with rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily compared with warfarin in patients with AF and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) in routine clinical practice in the United States.. CALLIPER was an observational, retrospective, new-user cohort study. Adult patients with AF in the US IBM Watson MarketScan databases who newly initiated anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily or warfarin between January 2013 and December 2017 were included. Comparative analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression after adjustment for potential confounding by the stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting approach and propensity score matching. One of the main study outcomes was worsening kidney function (composite of progression to CKD stage 5, kidney failure, or need for dialysis), besides traditional AF-related outcomes.. The cohort included 7368 patients: 5903 (80.1%) initiating warfarin and 1465 (19.9%) initiating rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily. Rivaroxaban 15 mg was associated with a significant 47% reduction in the risk of worsening kidney function versus warfarin (hazard ratio 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.78). Similar results were observed in the subgroup of patients with type 2 diabetes.. Rivaroxaban 15 mg may be associated with a lower risk of worsening kidney function as compared with warfarin in the atrial fibrillation population with moderate-to-severe CKD.. NCT03359876.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Kidney; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Current guidelines recommend using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but head-to-head trial data do not exist to guide the choice of DOAC.. To do a large-scale comparison between all DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) in routine clinical practice.. Multinational population-based cohort study.. Five standardized electronic health care databases, which covered 221 million people in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.. Patients who were newly diagnosed with AF from 2010 through 2019 and received a new DOAC prescription.. Database-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and all-cause mortality between DOACs were estimated using a Cox regression model stratified by propensity score and pooled using a random-effects model.. A total of 527 226 new DOAC users met the inclusion criteria (apixaban,. Residual confounding is possible.. Among patients with AF, apixaban use was associated with lower risk for GIB and similar rates of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, ICH, and all-cause mortality compared with dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. This finding was consistent for patients aged 80 years or older and those with chronic kidney disease, who are often underrepresented in clinical trials.. None.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Embolism; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; United States

The aim was to identify sex-specific factors linked with oral anticoagulant initiation in a cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation using administrative data from Quebec (Canada) between 2014 and 2017. Cohort entry defined as new users, that is, no claims in last 12 months, a cohort of 32 050 patients was stratified in two groups, that is, women and men. Multivariable regression models were used to identify factors of initiations for low- and standard-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin, and low- versus standard-dose DOACs. In both sexes, warfarin initiation decreased and DOAC initiation increased, with year of initiation as major factors of DOACs use. In 2017, the increase was of 2- to 4-fold and 3- to 8-fold for low- and standard-dose DOACs (vs. warfarin), respectively. The proportion of patients starting on a low-dose DOAC was higher in women than men. Older age for both sexes and CHADS

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which includes coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Antiplatelet therapy has long been the mainstay of antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of first-ever and recurrent ASCVD events. More recently, however, randomized trials have demonstrated the benefits and cost-effectiveness of a dual pathway inhibition (DPI) strategy in acute and chronic ASCVD. When used in combination, aspirin and low-dose rivaroxaban work synergistically to inhibit platelet activation and thrombin generation, thereby preventing thrombus formation. Among patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS), those with positive cardiac biomarkers or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or a history of heart failure derive the greatest absolute benefits. Among patients with chronic ASCVD, those with involvement of two or more vascular beds, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or diabetes derive the greatest absolute benefits. Additional trials are underway to assess the impact of DPI therapy in other populations of interest, including patients with ACS at high risk of left ventricular thrombus formation, intracranial atherosclerotic disease with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke, peripheral arterial disease with limiting claudication or post lower extremity revascularization, and advanced chronic kidney disease with ASCVD or risk factors for ASCVD. Further work is required to assess the possible added benefit of combining rivaroxaban with clopidogrel or ticagrelor instead of aspirin.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heart Failure; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

Topics: Aspirin; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban

In non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), rivaroxaban was not inferior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism. However, a comparative evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban and warfarin therapies for NVAF patients at different renal function levels has not yet been reported, and this study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in Chinese NVAF patients with CKD.. A Markov model was constructed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lifetime costs associated with the use of rivaroxaban relative to warfarin in patients with NVAF at different estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels as follows: 30 to <50, 50 to <80 and ≥80 mL/min. Input parameters were sourced from the clinical literature. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model uncertainty.. The incrementalQALYs with rivaroxaban was slightly increased by approximately 0.3 QALY as compared with that with warfarin in all the subgroups, resulting in an ICER of $9,736/QALY (eGFR, 30 to <50 mL/min), $9,758/QALY (50 to <80 mL/min) and $9,969/QALY (≥80 mL/min). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested a chance of >80% that the ICER would be lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of three times the GDP of China in 2019 in all the subgroups. Results were consistent even under the assumption of anticoagulant discontinuation after major bleeding events. The model was most sensitive to event-free-related utility and survival rates.. The existing evidence supports the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban therapy as an alternative anticoagulant to warfarin for patients with NVAF at different renal function levels.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Health Expenditures; Hemorrhage; Humans; Models, Econometric; Polyketides; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

We describe a patient with tertiary hyperparathyroidism with history of three episodes of deep vein thrombosis and on rivaroxaban. The patient underwent a subtotal parathyroidectomy, developing cervical hematoma with airway compression. Therefore, emergency surgical decompression was necessary. Later, on the ninth postoperative day, the serum ionized calcium levels were low. Medical team knowledge about preexisting diseases and their implication in the coagulation state are essential conditions to reduce morbidity and mortality of surgeries. However, no reports were found in literature about the association of hypocalcemia with the use of the new class of anticoagulants, which act as factor X inhibitors (Stuart-Prower factor), predisposing to increased bleeding in the immediate postoperative period.

Topics: Blood Coagulation Disorders; Calcium; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperparathyroidism; Hypocalcemia; Male; Middle Aged; Parathyroidectomy; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban

There is limited evidence on the effectiveness and safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study compared the risks of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (ISSE) and major bleeding in patients with NVAF and stage IV-V CKD treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin.. Patients with NVAF and stage IV-V CKD who initiated rivaroxaban or warfarin treatment between November 2011 and June 2018 were selected from the Optum® Deidentified Electronic Health Record Database. Propensity score matching was used to balance rivaroxaban and warfarin patients on 112 measured baseline covariates. ISSE and major bleeding events over 2 years following treatment initiation were ascertained with validated end point definitions. Outcomes were analyzed as time-to-event data using Kaplan-Meier survival estimators and Cox regression.. A total of 781 eligible rivaroxaban-treated patients were propensity score-matched to 1,536 warfarin-treated patients; baseline covariates were well balanced after matching (absolute standardized differences <0.1). The average patient age was 80 years; 60.5% were female; 81.3% and 18.7% had CKD stage IV and V, respectively. Hazard ratios for rivaroxaban compared to warfarin were 0.93 (95% CI 0.46-1.90, P = .85) for the risk of ISSE and 0.91 (95% CI 0.65-1.28, P = .60) for major bleeding.. No statistically significant difference in the risk of ISSE or major bleeding was found between rivaroxaban- and warfarin-treated patients. Although further study is needed, rivaroxaban appears to be a reasonable alternative to warfarin for ISSE prevention in the setting of NVAF and stage IV-V CKD.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Warfarin

Evidence for the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to prevent cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality in older individuals with a low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is lacking. We sought to characterize the association of oral anticoagulant use with CV morbidity in elderly patients with or without reductions in eGFRs, comparing DOACs with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).. Population-based retrospective cohort study.. All individuals 66 years or older with an initial prescription for oral anticoagulants dispensed in Ontario, Canada, from 2009 to 2016.. DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) compared with VKAs by eGFR group (≥60, 30-59, and<30mL/min/1.73m. The primary outcome was a composite of a CV event (myocardial infarction, revascularization, or ischemic stroke) or mortality. Secondary outcomes were CV events alone, mortality, and hemorrhage requiring hospitalization.. High-dimensional propensity score matching of DOAC to VKA users and Cox proportional hazards regression.. 27,552 new DOAC users were matched to 27,552 new VKA users (median age, 78 years; 49% women). There was significantly lower risk for CV events or mortality among DOAC users compared with VKA users (event rates of 79.78 vs 99.77 per 1,000 person-years, respectively; HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90]) and lower risk for hemorrhage (event rates of 10.35 vs 16.77 per 1,000 person-years, respectively; HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.58-0.91]). There was an interaction between eGFR and the association of anticoagulant class with the primary composite outcome (P<0.02): HRs of 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92-1.12], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75-0.93], and 0.75 [95% CI, 0.51-1.10] for eGFRs of≥60, 30 to 59, and<30mL/min/1.73m. Retrospective observational study design limits causal inference; dosages of DOACs and international normalized ratio values were not available; low event rates in some subgroups limited statistical power.. DOACs compared with VKAs were associated with lower risk for the composite of CV events or mortality, an association for which the strength was most apparent among those with reduced eGFRs. The therapeutic implications of these findings await further study.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Brain Ischemia; Cause of Death; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Ontario; Procedures and Techniques Utilization; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombophilia; Vitamin K

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are mostly prescribed to prevent cardioembolic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). An increasing number of guidelines recommend DOAC in AF patients with preserved renal function for the prevention of thromboembolism, and an increased use of DOAC in daily practice has been recorded also in elderly patients. Ageing is associated with a reduction in glomerular filtration rate, and impaired renal function, regardless of the cause, increases the risk of bleeding. Multiple medication use (polypharmacy) for treating superimposed co-morbidities is common in both elderly and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and drug-drug interaction may cause accumulation of DOAC, thereby increasing the risk of bleeding. The safety profile of DOAC in patients with CKD has not been defined with any certainty, particularly in those with severely impaired renal function or end stage renal disease. This has been due to the heterogeneity of studies and the relative paucity of data. This document reports the position of three Italian scientific societies engaged in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation who are treated with DOAC and present with CKD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Observational Studies as Topic; Polypharmacy; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Aim To compare efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and reduced creatinine clearance.Material and methods Systematic search for literature and indirect comparison of DOACs were performed.Results The indirect comparison included five randomized clinical trials. The DOACs were comparable by the efficacy of preventing stroke and systemic embolism. The safety profiles had differences. Apixaban significantly decreased the relative risk of major bleeding compared to rivaroxaban by 27 % (relative risk (RR) 0.73; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.98). The apixaban advantage was even greater in the group of patients with a creatinine clearance <50 ml/min: RR was reduced by 48 % compared to rivaroxaban (RR=0.52; 95 % CI: 0.32-0.84), by 50 % compared to dabigatran 300 mg/day (RR=0.50; 95 % CI: 0.31-0.81), and by 48 % compared to dabigatran 220 mg/day (RR=0.52; 95 % CI: 0.32-0.85)Conclusion The indirect comparison of DOACs showed that their efficacy was comparable. With respect of safety, apixaban is the preferrable DOAC for patients with atrial fibrillation and creatinine clearance below 50 ml/min.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased stroke and bleeding risk in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Little is known about the real-life use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in CKD stage G4. In a retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 182 consecutive AF patients with CKD stage G4 including 90 (49%) subjects on NOAC, ie, 61 on apixaban 2.5 mg bid and 29 on rivaroxaban 15 mg qd, and 92 (51%) subjects on warfarin. Thromboembolic and bleeding events were recorded during a mean follow-up of 26.3 months. There were no differences in demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables at baseline between the 2 treatment groups. During follow-up, arterial thromboembolic events occurred in 11 (12.22%) subjects on NOAC and 7 (7.61%) on warfarin, (hazard ratio [HR] 1.70; 95% CI, 0.65-4.42), with similar risk of ischemic stroke (9 [10%] vs. 7 [7.61%], P = 0.56, respectively). Major bleedings or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 14 (15.56%) on NOAC and 13 (14.13%) on warfarin, (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.53-2.39), with similar risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.20-2.47). We observed no difference in all-cause mortality related to the type of anticoagulants, but it tended to be lower in the apixaban group compared with rivaroxaban group (14.7% vs. 31%, P = 0.07), without any differences in thromboembolic and bleeding events. The study suggests that AF patients with CKD stage G4 receiving reduced-dose NOAC or warfarin have similar risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in everyday practice of a tertiary anticoagulation center.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Poland; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) have become increasingly more popular in recent years and have largely replaced warfarin in the treatment of certain conditions, such as atrial fibrillation, and in the prevention of thromboembolic events. Rivaroxaban is one of the most commonly used direct anticoagulant drugs for conditions such as atrial fibrillation and thromboprophylaxis. CASE REPORT We present a case of a 70-year-old male who developed acute interstitial nephritis after starting rivaroxaban, and who responded to medical treatment, which included corticosteroid therapy. A renal biopsy was not performed because the patient was on essential anticoagulation therapy secondary to a high CHADS2VASc score. CONCLUSIONS Dose adjustments when using rivaroxaban are necessary in patients with underlying renal failure. Acute interstitial nephritis is a rare condition associated with direct anticoagulant drugs. The treatment of acute interstitial nephritis is usually to remove the offending agent and treat the underlying cause.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Diagnosis, Differential; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Methylprednisolone; Nephritis, Interstitial; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban

In the last two decades a group of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has been developed that directly block the activity of thrombin or activated factor X. No randomized controlled trials have been conducted to verify their efficacy and safety in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation. Few studies compared NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) with classic anticoagulants in this unique group, and the results of these analyses remain controversial and inconclusive. Simple extrapolation of recommendations from the general population may be erroneous and lead to an increased risk of complications. Several controlled randomized trials with oral direct anticoagulants in hemodialysis patients are currently underway.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Background An enhanced renin-angiotensin system causes hypertensive renal damage. Factor Xa not only functions in the coagulation cascade but also activates intracellular signaling through protease-activated receptors ( PAR ). We investigated the effects of rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, on hypertensive renal damage in hypertensive mice overexpressing renin (Ren-TG). Methods and Results The 12- to 16-week-old Ren-TG and wild-type mice were orally administered with or without 6 or 12 mg/kg of rivaroxaban for 1 or 4 months. Plasma factor Xa was significantly increased in the Ren-TG compared with the wild-type mice and was reduced by 12 mg/kg of rivaroxaban ( P<0.05). Urinary albumin excretion (UAE) was higher in the nontreated 8-month-old Ren-TG than in the wild-type mice (69.6±29 versus 20.1±8.2 μg/day; P<0.01). Treatment with 12 mg/kg of rivaroxaban for 4 months decreased the UAE to 38.1±13.2 μg/day ( P<0.01). Moreover, rivaroxaban treatment attenuated histologic changes of glomerular hypertrophy, mesangial matrix expansion, effacement of the podocyte foot process, and thickened glomerular basement membrane in the Ren-TG. The renal expression of PAR -2 was increased in the Ren-TG, but was inhibited with rivaroxaban treatment. In vitro study using the human podocytes showed that the expressions of PAR -2 and inflammatory genes and nuclear factor--κB activation were induced by angiotensin II stimulation, but were inhibited by rivaroxaban. PAR -2 knockdown by small interfering RNA also attenuated the PAR -2-related inflammatory gene expressions. Conclusions These findings indicate that rivaroxaban exerts protective effects against angiotensin II-induced renal damage, partly through inhibition of the PAR -2 signaling-mediated inflammatory response.

Topics: Albuminuria; Angiotensin II; Animals; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gene Knockdown Techniques; Glomerular Basement Membrane; Glomerular Mesangium; Humans; Hypertension; In Vitro Techniques; Inflammation; Kidney Glomerulus; Male; Mice; Mice, Transgenic; Podocytes; Receptor, PAR-2; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Renin; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Rivaroxaban; Vasoconstrictor Agents

Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing hemodialysis were excluded from phase III randomized trials of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing hemodialysis in routine practice.. Using MarketScan data from January 2012 to December 2017, we identified patients on oral anticoagulant (OAC) with naïve nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing hemodialysis and with ≥12 months of insurance coverage before OAC initiation. Differences in baseline covariates between the rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts were adjusted using inverse probability-of-treatment weights based on propensity scores calculated using generalized boosted models and 10,000 regression trees (absolute standardized differences <0.1 achieved for all covariates after adjustment). Patients were followed until a stroke/systemic embolism or major bleeding event, OAC discontinuation/switch, insurance disenrollment, or end of data availability. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the OAC cohorts were calculated using Cox regression.. We identified 1896 rivaroxaban (38.7% received a dose <20 mg/d) and 4848 warfarin users. Eighty-eight percent of included patients had stage 5 chronic kidney disease or were undergoing hemodialysis. Rivaroxaban did not significantly reduce stroke or systemic embolism (HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.27-1.10) or ischemic stroke (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.30-1.50) alone, but it was associated with a significant 32% (95% CI = 1-53%) reduction in major bleeding risk compared with warfarin.. Among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing hemodialysis, rivaroxaban appears associated with significantly less major bleeding compared to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Databases, Factual; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin; Young Adult

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of stroke and bleeding. Although direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) trials excluded patients with severe CKD, a growing portion of CKD patients have been starting DOACs and limited data from real-world outcome in this high-risk setting are available. The INSigHT registry included 632 consecutive NVAF patients that started apixaban (256 patients, 41%), dabigatran (245, 39%) and rivaroxaban (131, 20%) between 2012 and 2015. Based on creatinine clearance, two sub-cohorts were defined: (1) non-CKD group (CrCl 60-89 mL/min, 413 patients) and (2) CKD group (15-59 ml/min, 219). Compared to non-CKD patients, those with CKD, were at higher ischemic (CHA

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Statistics, Nonparametric; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Patients; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Safety

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Female; Humans; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Adjustment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

In recent years, novel anticoagulant drugs have been introduced in the clinical armamentarium and have progressively gained momentum. Although their use is increasing among CKD patients, some skepticism about their risk-benefit ratio still persists. We sought to investigate the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in a cohort of moderate-to-advanced CKD patients.. This observational, retrospective, longitudinal study involved 347 consecutive CKD stage 3b-4 (according to NKF-KDOQI guidelines) patients enrolled from 8 cardiac outpatient clinics between March 2015 and October 2017. All patients received anticoagulation (100 warfarin vs. 247 rivaroxaban) as part of their non-valvular atrial fibrillation management at the attending physician's discretion. Clinical effectiveness (defined as the occurrence of ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, or transient ischemic attack) and safety (intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal or other bleeding) were assessed separately.. Over a mean follow-up period of 16 ± 0.3 months, 25 stroke episodes (15 hemorrhagic, and 10 ischemic) occurred in 24 warfarin treated patients vs. none in the rivaroxaban arm. There were 5 vs. 0 episodes of deep venous thrombosis and 8 vs. 2 major episodes of bleeding in the warfarin and rivaroxaban groups, respectively. In contrast, the proportion of minor episodes of bleeding was similar between groups.. Rivaroxaban seems a safe and effective therapeutic option in CKD stage 3b-4 patients. However, future randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively establish the role of rivaroxaban in CKD patients.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Recent studies suggest that calciphylaxis is a thrombotic condition in which arteriolar thrombosis leads to painful skin infarcts and consequent morbidity and mortality. Paradoxically, warfarin is implicated as a risk factor for calciphylaxis. Our objective is to report the use of oral direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors (termed direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) in patients with calciphylaxis.. We retrospectively reviewed records of 16 patients with calciphylaxis who received concomitant administration of novel anticoagulants. Patient data, including demographics, comorbidities, other treatments, and adverse events, were abstracted from the health records.. Eleven patients (69%) had chronic kidney disease (stage ≥3A), and eight (50%) received dialysis. Apixaban was the most frequently used agent (n = 11 [69%]). Dabigatran (n = 4 [25%]) and rivaroxaban (n = 2 [13%]) were reserved for patients with mild renal impairment (stage ≤2). One clinically relevant but nonmajor bleeding event occurred. There were no major bleeding events. Nine patients (56%) were alive at last follow-up, and five (31%) had complete resolution of their calciphylaxis (mean follow-up, 523 days; range, 26-1884 days).. DOACs were safe and well tolerated in patients with calciphylaxis, in this initial experience. Several patients had improvement or resolution of calciphylaxis in response to therapy that included DOACs. The degree of renal impairment should guide DOAC choice. Randomized trials are required to determine treatment efficacy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Calciphylaxis; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

The novel oral anticoagulants, including dabigatran and rivaroxaban, differ in their degree of renal excretion.. We conducted a population-based nested case-control study in patients 66 years and older with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (excluding patients undergoing chronic dialysis) who received an oral anticoagulant between April 2006 and March 2013. We calculated odds ratios for hospitalization with a major hemorrhagic event and receipt of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin in the preceding 60 days. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to investigate whether a relationship exists between major hemorrhage and advanced age (age < 80 years or ≥ 80 years).. We identified 237,409 patients with CKD, 4470 (1.9%) of whom experienced a major hemorrhage. We matched these patients to 14,460 controls. The use of dabigatran or rivaroxaban was not associated with a statistically significant elevated risk of hemorrhage compared with warfarin (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.45 for dabigatran; aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.83-1.79 for rivaroxaban). Our sensitivity analysis found that older age was associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage for patients receiving dabigatran (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.06-1.88); results were similar but did not reach statistical significance for rivaroxaban (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.91-2.69).. Among elderly patients with CKD, exposure to dabigatran or rivaroxaban was not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of major hemorrhagic events compared with exposure to warfarin.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Case-Control Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Ontario; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have varying degrees of renal elimination which may be challenging in patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined the severity and variation in renal impairment, and the proportion of patients requiring NOAC cessation or dose reduction.. A retrospective analysis of patients with HF and AF in the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity programme was carried out. Trends in renal impairment over 26 months were defined using Cockcroft-Gault (CG), simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was worse at every time point in patients with AF compared with those without AF, the difference being ∼11 mL/min (CG), 9 mL/min (CKD-EPI), and 7 mL/min (MDRD). As renal function declined, CG classified a greater proportion of patients as having moderate or severe CKD and agreement with MDRD/CKD-EPI declined. At least moderate renal impairment was present in a quarter of patients with AF at baseline, a third by study completion, and approaching a half at least once during follow-up. The projected need for NOAC dose reduction was accordingly high, though it varied between individual NOACs due to different criteria for adjustment.. Renal impairment in patients with HF and AF is common, fluctuates, progresses, and frequently mandates NOAC dose reduction, though the need for cessation is rare. Baseline renal function, the method of estimating GFR, and intensity of monitoring should be considered when commencing oral anticoagulation.

Topics: Aged; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiazoles

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulation (NOAC) agents have been approved for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated 'real-world' information on how these drugs are being adopted.. Using Danish nationwide administrative registers, we identified all oral anticoagulation-naïve AF patients initiating oral anticoagulation from 22 August 2011 through 31 October 2013. Using logistic regression analysis, baseline characteristics and temporal utilization trends were compared between initiators of warfarin vs. one of the N OACs: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. We identified 18 611 oral anticoagulation-naïve AF patients of which 9902 (53%) initiated warfarin treatment, 7128 (38%) dabigatran, 1303 (7%) rivaroxaban, and 278 (1%) apixaban. Overall, 40% of newly initiated patients were started on dabigatran within the first 4 months of when the drug came on market. By October, 2013, 40% were being started on warfarin and dabigatran, respectively, and another 20% were started on either rivaroxaban or apixaban. Rivaroxaban and apixaban users generally had a higher predicted risk of stroke and bleeding compared with warfarin and dabigatran users. Older age, female gender, and prior stroke were some of the factors associated with NOAC use vs. warfarin, whereas chronic kidney disease, myocardial infarction, and heart failure showed the opposite association.. Among oral anticoagulation-naïve AF patients initiated on oral anticoagulation in Denmark, warfarin initiation has declined since the introduction of dabigatran in August 2011. Dabigatran is the most frequently used alternative option to warfarin; however, use of rivaroxaban and apixaban is increasing. Patients initiated with rivaroxaban or apixaban in general have a higher predicted stroke and bleeding risks compared with warfarin or dabigatran initiators.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Denmark; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants require dosing adjustment according to renal function. We aimed to determine discordance in hypothetical recommended dosing of these drugs using different estimated glomerular filtration rate equations in patients with atrial fibrillation.. Cross-sectional analysis of 910 patients with atrial fibrillation and an indication for oral anticoagulation. The glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations. For dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban we identified dose discordance when there was disagreement in the recommended dose based on different equations.. Among the overall population, relative to Cockcroft-Gault, discordance in dabigatran dosage was 11.4% for Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and 10% for Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, discordance in rivaroxaban dosage was 10% for Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and 8.5% for the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. The lowest discordance was observed for apixaban: 1.4% for Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and 1.5% for the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. In patients with Cockcroft-Gault<60mL/min or elderly patients, discordances in dabigatran and rivaroxaban dosages were higher, ranging from 13.2% to 30.4%. Discordance in apixaban dosage remained<5% in these patients.. Discordance in new oral anticoagulation dosages using different equations is frequent, especially among elderly patients with renal impairment. This discordance was higher in dabigatran and rivaroxaban dosages than in apixaban dosages. Further studies are needed to clarify the clinical importance of these discordances and the optimal anticoagulant dosages depending on the use of different equations to estimate renal function.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Feeding Behavior; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Renal insufficiency increases the risk of stroke and bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients. Although vitamin K antagonists reduce the risk of stroke in patients with moderate renal dysfunction, this observation is less clear in patients with renal impairment. Moreover, the risk of bleeding with vitamin K antagonists increases as renal function worsens. Maintaining international normalized ratio values within therapeutic targets is more difficult in patients with renal dysfunction, and those agents may cause warfarin-related nephropathy and vascular calcification. Rivaroxaban is the only nonvitamin K oral anticoagulant with a dose specifically tested in patients with moderate renal insufficiency. Rivaroxaban is effective for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation patients with moderate renal dysfunction, with a lower risk of intracranial and fatal bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin