rivaroxaban and Osteoarthritis

rivaroxaban has been researched along with Osteoarthritis* in 2 studies

Trials

1 trial(s) available for rivaroxaban and Osteoarthritis

ArticleYear
Comparison of Enoxaparin and Rivaroxaban in Balance of Anti-Fibrinolysis and Anticoagulation Following Primary Total Knee Replacement: A Pilot Study.
    Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2017, Feb-08, Volume: 23

    BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess whether the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) would be altered when rivaroxaban or enoxaparin was used for thromboprophylaxis in primary total knee replacement (TKR). It was hypothesized that the hemostatic effect of TXA would be better with the use of enoxaparin. MATERIAL AND METHODS A randomized clinical trial was conducted on 194 patients undergoing primary TKR for osteoarthritis. An intravenous dose of 15 mg/kg (TXA) and 1 g topical TXA were used. Patients randomly received enoxaparin or rivaroxaban prophylaxis when the drainage was less than 30 ml/h 6-8 h postoperatively. The primary endpoint was hidden blood loss (HBL). Indexes of total blood loss drainage, hemoglobin drop, transfusion, range of motion (ROM), HSS score, VAS pain score, knee swelling, length of hospital stay (LOHS), incidence of venous thromboembolism, major/minor bleeding, and wound complications were also compared between the groups. RESULTS More than 80% of patients initiated anticoagulation within 6 h postoperatively. No statistically significance difference was detected in terms of HBL (679.0±205.6 vs. 770.5±206.1, p=.062) or other bleeding index, ROM, or LOHS. The motion VAS pain score and knee swelling (16.7% vs. 6.1%, p=.021) were significantly lower, and HSS score at discharge was higher in the enoxaparin group. The rivaroxaban group had less asymptomatic deep venous (4.1% vs. 0%, p=.121) and muscular venous thrombosis (2.1% vs. 9.2%, p=.033); more ecchymosis (13.5% vs. 10.2%, p=.472), and wound complications (13.5% vs. 6.1%, p=.082). No episodes of transfusion, pulmonary embolism, or major bleeding occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS More attention should be paid to the increased risk of wound complications and knee swelling associated with rivaroxaban, although the hidden blood loss was similar in both groups.

    Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Blood Coagulation; Drug Interactions; Enoxaparin; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis; Pilot Projects; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Tranexamic Acid; Venous Thromboembolism

2017

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for rivaroxaban and Osteoarthritis

ArticleYear
Extended thromboprophylaxis for hip or knee arthroplasty. Does the administration route and dosage regimen affect adherence? A cohort study.
    International orthopaedics, 2020, Volume: 44, Issue:2

    Prevention of thromboembolic disease requires patients' adherence to the extended thromboprophylaxis scheme. Oral anticoagulants are expected to improve adherence as a result of their route of administration; however, this assumption is yet to be confirmed. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the route of administration and dosage regimen on the compliance to the prescription.. This prospective cohort study included hip and knee arthroplasty patients who received pharmacological extended thromboprophylaxis with one daily injection, one daily oral tablet, or two daily oral tablets. A telephonic questionnaire was applied 35 days after the day of the surgery. Patients who omitted one or more doses of medication during the follow-up period were classified as "non-adherent." Differences of adherence rates were assessed.. Five hundred and twenty patients were included: 153 received Apixaban (oral, twice a day), 155 Enoxaparin (injectable, once a day), and 212 Rivaroxaban (oral, once a day). Patients receiving oral once a day medication was more compliant compared with those who received an oral medication twice a day. Non-adherence rates were 3.2 and 9.2%, respectively (p = 0.033). No significant differences (p = 0.360) were found between oral once a day and injectable once a day medication.. The number of daily doses prescribed was related to adherence to extended chemical prophylaxis, while the route of administration did not seem to have a significant impact. Strategies to promote outpatient compliance must be implemented, especially when regimes including more than one daily dose are prescribed.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Routes; Enoxaparin; Female; Hip Fractures; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Young Adult

2020