rivaroxaban and Obesity--Morbid

Current guidelines give class I recommendations for uninterrupted use of dabigatran rivaroxaban as an alternative to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients of atrial fibrillation (AF) who are undergoing catheter ablation. The recent randomized controlled trials have shown similar efficacy of novel oral anticoagulants when compared to VKA in these patients. We sought to perform a meta-analysis with a focus on subgroup analysis of novel oral anticoagulants.. We searched PubMed, Clinical trials registry and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials were searched through August 2020. Six RCTs studies (n = 2260) comparing the use of NOACs versus VKA in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation were included. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval was computed and P < 0.05 was considered as a level of significance. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were considered as a primary endpoint.. Our results showed a significant difference in MACE between NOACs and VKA [OR 0.57 (0.37-0.88); P = 0.01] and in major bleeding events [OR 0.55 (0.35-0.86); P = 0.009], which is mainly derived from the use of dabigatran. No significant difference in MACE or major bleeding events was found on the subgroup analysis of rivaroxaban and apixaban over VKA therapy.. Uninterrupted use of NOACs is safe and effective alternative for the prevention of cerebral thromboembolism and reducing the risk of major bleeding in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. However, the individual subgroup analysis showed that only dabigatran is superior to VKA in terms of reducing MACE through a reduction in major bleeding. The rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban are non-inferior to VKA therapy based on these results. Further studies are needed to generalize these recommendations in morbidly obese patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly preferred over warfarin; however, The International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis recommended avoiding the use of DOACs in morbidly obese patients (body mass index >40 or weight >120 kg) because of limited clinical data.. Are DOACs effective and safe in morbidly obese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. We performed a comprehensive search for published studies indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of DOACs in morbidly obese patients with NVAF.. Information on patient characteristics, comorbidities, primary anticoagulation indications, pharmacologic treatment, and outcomes were collected. The primary outcome of interest was stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) rate. The secondary outcome was major bleeding (MB).. A total of 10 studies including, 89,494 morbidly obese patients with NVAF on oral anticoagulation therapy (45,427 on DOACs vs. 44,067 on warfarin) were included in the final analysis. The SSE rate was significantly lower in DOACs group compared with warfarin group [odds ratio: 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62-0.81; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0%]. MB rate was also significantly lower in DOACs group compared with the warfarin group (odds ratio: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46-0.78; P < 0.0001; I2 = 86%). On subgroup analysis, SSE and MB event rates were significantly lower in rivaroxaban and apixaban than warfarin; however, dabigatran showed noninferiority to warfarin in SSE rate but superiority in the safety outcome.. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that DOACs are effective and safe with statistical superiority when compared with warfarin in morbidly obese patients. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in this cohort of patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Obesity, Morbid; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The health implications of obesity are myriad and multifaceted. Physiologic changes associated with obesity can affect the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of administered drugs, thereby altering their pharmacologic profiles. In 2016, the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis published recommendations about the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese patients. This guidance provides uniform recommendations for all DOACs, yet data suggest that individual agents may be affected to different degrees by obesity. Moreover, there are no recommendations currently available to guide DOAC use in bariatric surgery patients, in whom anatomic and physiologic changes to the digestive system can influence drug pharmacokinetics. Our review of the available literature indicates that the clinical profile of the DOAC rivaroxaban is not affected by high weight or bariatric surgery; hence, it does not appear that rivaroxaban dosing needs to be altered in these patient populations.

Topics: Bariatric Surgery; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

Porto-mesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) is a significant complication that occurs more frequently after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) than other bariatric procedures and presents later than other venous thromboembolic (VTE) events often 2 weeks after the operation. The common current practice in bariatric surgery of perioperative chemoprophylaxis until discharge may not adequately prevent PMVT. Therefore, a 30-day post-discharge chemoprophylaxis (PDC) might reduce the incidence of PMVT. The objective of this study is to determine whether 30-day PDC with rivaroxaban 10 mg daily following SG can reduce the incidence of PMVT.. In a retrospective cohort study, 292 consecutive patients undergoing SG by a single surgeon were either prescribed rivaroxaban 10 mg daily for 30 days upon discharge (group A) or did not receive any PDC (group B). Primary outcome was PMVT and secondary outcome was bleeding. Patients on chronic anticoagulation therapy were excluded from the study.. PMVT events differences were significant between the groups while bleeding events were not. Group A had zero PMVT events, while group B had four (p = .045). There were 4 bleeding events in group A and 7 bleeding events on group B (p = .341).. A 30-day PDC regimen of rivaroxaban 10 mg daily is both safe and effective. This study demonstrated zero PMVT events without an increased risk of bleeding using this regimen.

Topics: Aftercare; Anticoagulants; Gastrectomy; Humans; Laparoscopy; Mesenteric Ischemia; Obesity, Morbid; Patient Discharge; Portal Vein; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Aftercare; Anticoagulants; Bariatric Surgery; Gastrectomy; Humans; Laparoscopy; Obesity, Morbid; Patient Discharge; Portal Vein; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

To investigate real-world prescribing trends and clinical outcomes based on body mass index (BMI) categorization in patients who received rivaroxaban therapy.. This was a retrospective cohort study involving all patients who received rivaroxaban therapy across all Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC) hospitals from 2015 to 2020.. Rivaroxaban prescribing has significantly increased over the years across general population, with a noticeable decline in obese population during the last few years (from 2018 onwards). Furthermore, an appreciable association was evident between all-cause mortality and BMI of these patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Overweight; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thinness

Rivaroxaban is a first-line option for the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, limited data are available regarding its effectiveness in morbidly obese patients.. To evaluate rates of thrombosis and bleeding in morbidly obese patients receiving rivaroxaban or warfarin for VTE.. A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare rates of bleeding and thrombosis in patients receiving rivaroxaban versus warfarin for acute VTE. Patients were included if they were older than 18 years and had a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m. A total of 1281 patients were identified for acute VTE and were included in this study with 487 patients receiving rivaroxaban and 785 receiving warfarin. The average cohort age was 57.6 ± 14.6 years, and the average weight was 136.4 ± 27.2 kg. After controlling for confounding factors, the use of rivaroxaban was not associated with an increased hazard of VTE events when compared with warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-1.08,. No difference was observed in obese patients with weight >120 kg or BMI >40 kg/m

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Prior observational studies suggest rivaroxaban is safe and effective among patients with morbid obesity who suffered a venous thromboembolism (VTE) event, but existing data are more limited in the broader population of VTE patients with obesity. This study assessed VTE recurrence, major bleeding, healthcare resource utilization, and healthcare costs among VTE patients with obesity who received rivaroxaban versus warfarin. VTE patients with obesity who initiated rivaroxaban or warfarin after a first VTE (index date) were identified from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database (01/02/2011-09/30/2019). The follow-up period spanned from the index date until health plan disenrollment, end of data availability, cancer diagnosis/treatment, end of the 12 month post-index period, or (for the analysis of major bleeding) anticoagulant discontinuation or switch. Patient characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The weighted rivaroxaban (N = 8666) and warfarin cohorts (N = 5946) were well balanced (mean age = 51 years, females = 52%). Over a 9.6 months mean observation period, rivaroxaban users had a significantly lower risk of VTE recurrence [7.0% vs. 8.2%, HR(95% CI) = 0.85(0.75;0.97)] and a similar risk of major bleeding [4.1% vs. 3.6%, HR(95% CI) = 1.11(0.89;1.37)] relative to warfarin users at 12 months. Relative to warfarin users, rivaroxaban users had significantly fewer all-cause outpatient visits [RR(95% CI) = 0.71(0.70;0.74)]. The higher pharmacy costs incurred by rivaroxaban recipients (cost difference = $1252) were offset by lower medical costs (cost difference = - $2515, all p < 0.05) compared with warfarin recipients. Our findings suggest that rivaroxaban is safe and effective versus warfarin, and associated with lower medical costs among VTE patients with obesity.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Health Care Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Despite evolving evidence, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with extremes of body weight remains controversial. This study aimed to measure the impact of DOACs compared to warfarin on safety and efficacy outcomes in extreme body weight patients. This multi-center, health system, retrospective study examined the outcomes of patients with all body weights and extreme body weights prescribed a DOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban) or warfarin for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism over a 9-year period. The primary outcome was a composite of thromboembolism, symptomatic recurrent VTE, or severe bleeding; analyzed by pre-determined BMI cutoffs. A total of 19,697 patients were included in the study: 11,604 in the DOAC group and in the 8093 in the warfarin group. 295 patients were underweight and 9108 patients were pre-obese to obese class 3. After adjusting for potential confounders, warfarin patients had higher odds of experiencing the composite outcome compared to DOAC patients (OR 1.337, 95% CI 1.212-1.475). Additionally, obese patients were 24.6% more likely to experience the outcome compared to normal BMI patients. Adjusted modeling showed that warfarin patients experienced higher bleed rates compared to DOAC patients (OR 1.432, 95% CI 1.266-1.620). Obese patients were less likely to be diagnosed with a bleed (OR 0.749, 95% CI 0.658-0.854), and underweight patients were more likely to be diagnosed with a bleed (OR 1.522, 95% CI 1.095-2.115) compared to normal BMI patients. In conclusion, DOACs for atrial fibrillation or VTE in patients with extreme body weights appear safe and effective when compared to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thinness; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Obesity, Morbid; Patient Selection; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Studies on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese patients are limited. Current guidelines advise against DOAC use in patients with a body weight more than 120 kg or body mass index higher than 40 kg/m. Retrospective matched cohort study.. Integrated delivery system of 40 academic, community, and specialty hospitals.. A total of 1840 adults with a primary admission diagnosis of acute VTE who received a DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban [632 patients] or warfarin [1208 patients]) while hospitalized between January 1, 2011, and October 1, 2015, and who had a body weight more than 100 kg and less than 300 kg, were included. Patients in the warfarin group were matched in a 2:1 ratio to patients who received a DOAC based on history of VTE, chronic kidney disease, race, and age.. The primary outcome was recurrence of VTE within 12 months of the index admission date. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) events separately within the study time frame, as well as bleeding within 12 months of the index admission date. No significant difference in the recurrence of VTE was observed between patients who received a DOAC compared with those who received warfarin (6.5% vs 6.4%, p=0.93). Likewise, no significant differences in the occurrence of PE and DVT were seen between the DOAC- and warfarin-treated patients (3.7% vs 3.8%, p=0.94, and 3% vs 3.5%, p=0.56, respectively). Bleeding occurred in 1.7% and 1.2% of patients in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively (p=0.31).. To our knowledge, this is the largest clinical study to date showing that patients with obesity can be treated effectively and safely with a DOAC compared with warfarin for acute VTE. Thus DOACs should be considered a reasonable alternative to warfarin for treatment of acute VTE in obese patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Emerging safety and efficacy data for rivaroxaban suggest traditional therapy and rivaroxaban are comparable in the morbidly obese. However, real-world data that indicate pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters are comparable at the extremes of body size are lacking. The International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardisation Committee (ISTH SSC) suggests avoiding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients weighing >120 kg or with a body mass index >40 kg/m. To generate a population PK model to understand the influence of bodyweight on rivaroxaban exposure from clinical practice data.. Rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and patient characteristics were collated between 2013 and 2018 at King's College Hospital anticoagulation clinic. A population PK model was developed using a nonlinear mixed effects approach and then used to simulate rivaroxaban concentrations at the extremes of bodyweight.. A robust population PK model derived from 913 patients weighing between 39 kg and 172 kg was developed. The model included data from n = 86 >120 kg, n = 74 BMI >40 kg/m. Our work demonstrates rivaroxaban can be used at extremes of bodyweight provided renal function is satisfactory. We recommend that the ISTH SSC revises the current guidance with respect to rivaroxaban at extremes of body size.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Body Mass Index; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Rivaroxaban

A morbidly obese patient with history of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism was diagnosed with an acute left upper extremity deep vein thrombosis and started on rivaroxaban. Three months later, the patient returned with swelling in the right arm and was found to have a right brachial thrombosis. Anticoagulant therapy was switched to a low-molecular-weight heparin, and patient was discharged on enoxaparin along with an order to follow-up with a hematologist. Subanalyses from randomized controlled trials, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, and real-world studies suggest that rivaroxaban may be effective and safe in morbidly obese patients for primary and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. However, the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis does not recommend the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in this population. If used, drug levels should be monitored to guide the therapy. Due to the disparity in data to show efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in morbidly obese subjects, the interpatient variability of rivaroxaban's effects in subjects, and the lack of defined therapeutic range for rivaroxaban drug concentration, rivaroxaban should be used cautiously in this population.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Limited data exist on direct-acting oral anticoagulants in morbidly obese patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). We compared clinical and health/economic outcomes with rivaroxaban versus warfarin for VTE treatment in morbidly obese patients.. This retrospective 1:1 propensity score matched cohort study analyzed data from 2 US claims databases. VTE patients initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin were identified who had diagnosis codes for morbid obesity (ICD-9:278.01,V85.4; ICD-10:E66.01,E66.2,Z68.4) 12 months pre- or 3 months post-initiation and followed ≥3 months. Intent-to-treat (ITT) and on-treatment (OT) analyses were conducted using conditional logistic regression and generalized linear models to compare recurrent VTE and major bleeding risks, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and per patient per year (PPPY) costs.. In total, 2890 matched pairs of morbidly obese VTE patients initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin were identified. Risks of recurrent VTE (ITT: OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.85-1.14) and major bleeding (OT: OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.47-1.19) were similar for cohorts. Anti-Factor Xa laboratory measurement was performed on <1% of rivaroxaban cohort. Hospitalizations (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.96) and outpatient visits (OR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.10-0.56), were lower with rivaroxaban versus warfarin (ITT analysis). Average total medical costs PPPY were $2829 lower with rivaroxaban versus warfarin ($34,824 vs $37,653), mainly driven by hospitalization costs. Total healthcare costs (including pharmacy) were similar ($43,034 vs $44,565).. Morbidly obese VTE patients receiving rivaroxaban had similar risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding versus warfarin. Rivaroxaban treatment yielded significantly less HRU and total medical costs, with similar total healthcare costs between groups.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis recommends avoiding direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in morbidly obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter.. A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted of patients older than 18 years, with BMI >40 kg/m. A total of 64 patients in each group were included in the study analysis. The incidence rate of ischemic stroke or TIA was 1.75%/year in the DOAC group compared with 2.07%/year in the warfarin group (rate ratio = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.23 to 3.14; P = 0.80). The incidence rate of major bleeding was 2.18%/year in the DOAC group, compared with 4.97%/year in the warfarin group (rate ratio = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.15 to 1.25; P = 0.11). Conclusion and Relevance: Apixaban and rivaroxaban may be considered as alternatives to warfarin for atrial fibrillation or flutter in morbidly obese patients. Dabigatran use in morbidly obese patients needs caution until further studies are conducted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin; Young Adult

We report the case of a morbidly obese 49-year-old female found to have a 16×14×10 cm high grade myxoid liposarcoma of the thigh initially diagnosed as a hematoma. Recent initiation of rivaroxaban for a coincident ipsilateral popliteal vein thrombosis placed hematoma high in the differential diagnosis. Despite its large size, the mass was not directly appreciable on physical exam due to excess adjacent adipose tissue. Diagnostic success was achieved only after anchoring bias was abandoned and adaptive expertise was applied.

Topics: Diagnosis, Differential; Diagnostic Errors; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hematoma; Humans; Liposarcoma, Myxoid; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Popliteal Vein; Rivaroxaban; Thigh; Thrombosis

There are limited data regarding clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are morbidly obese (body mass index >40 kg/m. Using data from 2 US healthcare claims databases, we identified patients initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin who had ≥1 medical claim with an AF diagnosis, a diagnostic code for morbid obesity (ICD-9: 278.01, V85.4%; ICD-10: E66.01%, E66.2%, Z68.4%), and a minimum continuous enrollment of 12 months before and 3 months after treatment initiation. Patients were excluded if they had mitral stenosis, a mechanical heart valve procedure, an organ/tissue transplant, or an oral anticoagulant prescription prior to the index date. Rivaroxaban and warfarin patients were 1:1 propensity score matched. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding risk. Generalized linear models were used to compare healthcare resource utilization and costs.. A total of 3563 matched pairs of morbidly obese AF patients treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin were identified. The majority (81.4%) of patients in the rivaroxaban cohort were receiving the 20 mg dose. The rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts were well balanced after propensity score matching. The risks of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding were similar for rivaroxaban and warfarin users (stroke/systemic embolism: 1.5% vs 1.7%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60, 1.28; P = .5028; major bleeding: 2.2% vs 2.7%; OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.59, 1.08; P = .1447). Total healthcare costs including medication costs per patient per year (PPPY) were significantly lower with rivaroxaban versus warfarin ($48,552 vs $52,418; P = .0025), which was primarily driven by lower hospitalization rate (50.2% vs 54.1%; P = .0008), shorter length of stay (7.5 vs 9.1 days; P = .0010), and less outpatient service utilization (86 vs 115 visits PPPY; P < .0001).. Morbidly obese AF patients treated with rivaroxaban had comparable risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding as those treated with warfarin, but lower healthcare resource utilization and costs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Costs; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Morbidity; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; United States; Warfarin

Because studies of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism and non-valvular atrial fibrillation have had minimal representation of morbidly obese patients (ie, body-mass index [BMI] ≥40 kg/m. We did a single-centre, retrospective analysis of chart data for all adult patients aged at least 18 years at Montefiore Medical Center (Bronx, NY, USA) with a BMI of at least 40 kg/m. We obtained data for 795 patients: 150 prescribed apixaban, 326 rivaroxaban, and 319 warfarin. In 366 patients prescribed an anticoagulant for venous thromboembolism, the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism was similar between the apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin cohorts (1/47 [2·1%, 95% CI 0·0-6·3], 3/152 [2·0%, 0·0-4·2], and 2/167 [1·2%, 0·0-2·9], respectively; p=0·74). Incidence of major bleeding in this patient group was also similar between the treatment cohorts (1/47 patients on apixaban [2·1%, 95% CI 0·0-6·3], 2/152 on rivaroxaban [1·3%, 0·0-3·1], and 4/167 on warfarin [2·4%, 0·1-4·7]; p=0·77). In 429 patients prescribed an anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation, incidence of stroke was similar between the treatment cohorts (1/103 patients on apixaban [1·0%, 95% CI 0·0-2·9], 4/174 on rivaroxaban [2·3%, 0·1-4·5], and 2/152 on warfarin [1·3%, 0·0-3·1], p=0·71). In this patient group, major bleeding occurred in 3/103 patients on apixaban (2·9%, 95% CI 0·0-6·2), 5/174 on rivaroxaban (2·9%, 0·4-5·4), and 12/152 on warfarin (7·9%, 3·6-12·2); p=0·063. Time-to-event analyses showed that risk of all outcomes in patients with venous thromboembolism, and stroke and composite bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation, were similar between the anticoagulant cohorts.. Our retrospective study provides further evidence of similar efficacy and safety between the direct oral anticoagulants apixaban and rivaroxaban, and warfarin in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. These data, if confirmed in prospective studies, might enable patients with a BMI of at least 40 kg/m. None.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Patients with psychiatric disorders in critical condition are difficult to treat. In this study, we report on a patient with underlying schizoaffective disorder who developed catatonia, cardiac arrest, and pulmonary embolism, as well as a successful treatment strategy.. The inpatient is a 41-year-old morbidly obese male with schizoaffective disorder whose clozapine dosage was titrated from 100 mg to 175 mg due to auditory hallucination and agitation. The patient abruptly developed acute cardiopulmonary symptoms associated with an elevated troponin-I level. He was transferred to a cardiac intensive care unit, where he remained for 3 days. He was also found to have excited catatonic symptoms, and the lorazepam-diazepam protocol was initiated to quickly relieve the catatonia. Once the coronary angiogram was read as normal, the patient was transferred back to the psychiatric ward. However, the patient then suffered from in-hospital cardiac arrest. He was resuscitated and again transferred to the medical intensive care unit. Computed tomography confirmed the diagnosis of a pulmonary embolism. The patient was treated with Rivaroxaban 30 mg/d for the first 21 days, followed by 20 mg daily for 3 months. To control his severe and refractory psychotic symptoms, the patient was re-prescribed clozapine. During the 15-month follow-up period, the patient demonstrated a fair response and tolerability to clozapine 150 mg without symptoms relapse and no thromboembolic event.. This report can serve to remind psychiatrists and physicians to be aware of fatal conditions in patients with psychiatric diseases and physical illnesses.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Catatonia; Clozapine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hallucinations; Humans; Male; Obesity, Morbid; Psychotic Disorders; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antithrombins; Blood Coagulation; Body Mass Index; Dabigatran; Drug Substitution; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Failure

Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor, which is rapidly absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. In large trials, it has been shown to be effective and safe in VTE treatment. However, in these trials patients with morbid obesity were not reported and it is unknown if the standard dosage of 20 mg rivaroxaban is sufficient for bariatric patients, especially after bariatric surgery, which may impact the resorption of rivaroxaban. We report the case of a bariatric patient with high venous thromboembolism risk and instable INR after recent bariatric surgery, who was switched from Vitamin-K antagonists to rivaroxaban. After intake of 20 mg rivaroxaban, plasma concentration were repeatedly measured until 3 h after the second dose using a commercially available chromogenic aXa-assay. Furthermore, INR and aPTT were measured. Peak concentrations of 224.22 ng/ml were observed. After 6 h, plasma concentration decreased to 86.9 ng/ml and remained stable until 12 h (86.32 ng/ml). After 24 h, a trough level of 35.54 ng/ml was observed. The patients INR did immediately increase and remained significantly elevated throughout the day with a slow decrease. Since peak values of rivaroxaban plasma concentrations were in the expected range of published data, we conclude that resorption of rivaroxaban was immediate and not significantly impaired by bariatric surgery of the upper GI tract. Consequently, no dose adjustments seem to be necessary in this high-risk population.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Bariatric Surgery; Female; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Morpholines; Obesity, Morbid; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K