rivaroxaban and Neoplasms

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin for treating cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT).. To determine the cost and effectiveness of DOACs versus LMWH.. Cohort-state transition decision analytic model.. Network meta-analysis comparing DOACs versus LMWH.. Adult patients with cancer at the time they develop thrombosis.. Lifetime.. Health care sector.. Strategies of 1) enoxaparin, 2) apixaban, 3) edoxaban, and 4) rivaroxaban for treatment of CAT.. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in 2022 U.S. dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.. In the base-case scenario, using drug prices from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Federal Supply Schedule, apixaban dominated enoxaparin and edoxaban by being less costly and more effective. Rivaroxaban was slightly more effective than apixaban, with an ICER of $493 246. In a scenario analysis using "real-world" drug prices from GoodRx, rivaroxaban was cost-effective with an ICER of $50 053 per QALY.. Results were highly sensitive to monthly drug costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY, apixaban was preferred in 80% of simulations. However, sensitivity analyses also demonstrated that apixaban only remained cost-effective if monthly medication costs were below $530. Above this, rivaroxaban became cost-effective.. An assumption was made that patients would continue anticoagulation indefinitely unless they suffered a major bleed. Nonmedical costs such as patient and caregiver loss of productivity were not accounted for, and long-term thrombotic complications were not explicitly modeled.. The 3 DOACs are more effective and more cost-effective than LMWH. The most cost-effective DOAC depends on the relative cost of each of these agents. These are important considerations for treating physicians and health policymakers.. None.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Enoxaparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

This review aims to assess the treatment options for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) based on the most robust level of evidence recommendations and suggestions based on expert opinion.. Several classes of anticoagulants have been studied in the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Since the CLOT trial, guidelines recommend the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for the treatment of this condition. However, since 2018, some direct oral anticoagulants became an alternative first-line treatment for CAT. Three Xa antagonists (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) proved to be at least as effective as the LMWH strategy for the short-term prevention of VTE recurrence. The right choice of treatment in the context of anticoagulation strategy, thrombo-hemorrhagic risk management, and a patient's comorbidities represents a challenge. The correct management of CAT and a more individualized approach are needed to identify risk factors and offer the best treatment for each patient.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

To conduct an update of the ASCO venous thromboembolism (VTE) guideline.. After publication of potentially practice-changing clinical trials, identified through ASCO's signals approach to updating, an updated systematic review was performed for two guideline questions: perioperative thromboprophylaxis and treatment of VTE. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between November 1, 2018, and June 6, 2022.. Five RCTs provided information that contributed to changes to the 2019 recommendations. Two RCTs addressed direct factor Xa inhibitors (either rivaroxaban or apixaban) for extended thromboprophylaxis after surgery. Each of these postoperative trials had important limitations but suggested that these two oral anticoagulants are safe and effective in the settings studied. An additional three RCTs addressed apixaban in the setting of VTE treatment. Apixaban was effective in reducing the risk of recurrent VTE, with a low risk of major bleeding.. Apixaban and rivaroxaban were added as options for extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis after cancer surgery, with a weak strength of recommendation. Apixaban was also added as an option for the treatment of VTE, with high quality of evidence and a strong recommendation.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are common in cancer management and complicate the choice of anticoagulation in cancer-associated thrombosis. Cancer confers an increased risk of thrombotic events. Also, more bleeding events are observed in those who receive anticoagulation compared to those without cancer. In the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been found to be at least as effective as low-molecular weight heparins, which became the standard of care after several trials demonstrated superiority over vitamin K antagonists. Non-inferiority compared to low-molecular weight heparins has been shown for rivaroxaban, edoxaban and apixaban with a signal of fewer recurrent thrombotic events, albeit with an increase in bleeding events. Yet, potentially major pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions have been identified as a reason to withhold DOACs and to rather choose an alternative. Practical guidance on what constitutes a major pharmacokinetic interaction and/or how to deal with these interactions in clinical practice is limited. Hence, here we have provided a framework to allow clinicians to better deal with pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between DOACs and cancer therapies in the management of cancer-associated thrombosis. In this review we have discussed the current literature, how the pharmacokinetic profile links to the label information on DDI, and have provided a practical proposal, applied to a clinical case.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Drug Interactions; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

To present the randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence and highlight the areas of uncertainty regarding direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT).. In the last years, four RCTs have shown that rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban are at least as effective as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for the treatment of both incidental and symptomatic CAT. On the other hand, these drugs increase the risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cancer at this site. Another two RCTs have demonstrated that apixaban and rivaroxaban also prevent CAT in subjects at intermediate-to-high risk commencing chemotherapy, albeit at the price of higher likelihood of bleeding. By contrast, data are limited about the use DOAC in individuals with intracranial tumors or concomitant thrombocytopenia. It is also possible that some anticancer agents heighten the effects of DOAC via pharmacokinetic interactions, up to making their effectiveness-safety profile unfavorable. Leveraging the results of the aforementioned RCTS, current guidelines recommend DOAC as the anticoagulants of choice for CAT treatment and, in selected cases, prevention. However, the benefit of DOAC is less defined in specific patient subgroups, in which the choice of DOAC over LMWH should be carefully pondered.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Brain Neoplasms; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of both low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and direct factor Xa inhibitors (apixapan, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) as first-line options for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. However, most of these guidelines refer to the general cancer patient population and provide limited guidance for specific subgroups of patients at particularly high risk of bleeding, such as those with gastrointestinal cancers, primary or metastatic brain tumors, thrombocytopenia, or renal impairment. In these complex populations, the management of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) poses unique challenges and requires a nuanced approach based on the primum non nocere principle. This comprehensive review critically examines the relevant literature and discusses the therapeutic options currently available for the management of CAT in these special situations.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

This review summarizes current evidence and guideline recommendations concerning diagnosis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). For the diagnostic pathway, evidence-based algorithms should be employed, based on the assessment of pretest clinical probability. D‑dimer tests may reduce the need for subsequent diagnostic procedures. Clinical management of PE is guided by risk stratification according to early mortality. Lactate levels may be helpful for further risk stratification. The acute treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is commenced with intensified anticoagulation (AC), either with parenteral AC or higher initial doses of apixaban or rivaroxaban. All patients with VTE should receive the anticoagulation maintenance therapy for 3-6 months, while the duration of the subsequent secondary prophylaxis depends on the presumed risk of VTE recurrence and bleeding. Compression therapy is used to prevent postthrombotic syndrome. Acute revascularization procedures are limited to rare special cases. In obese patients up to 150 kg, standard doses of rivaroxaban and apixaban are appropriate. In cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT), the previous guideline recommendation to use low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for 3-6 months is now broadened with the recommendation for factor Xa inhibitors, with the caveat for gastrointestinal and urothelial cancer or expected drug-drug interactions with the anticancer treatment. Here, and in unstable clinical situations, LMWH is preferred.. In dieser Übersichtsarbeit werden die aktuelle Evidenz und Empfehlungen aus aktuellen Leitlinien zur Diagnostik und Therapie von tiefer Venenthrombose (TVT) und Lungenembolie (LE) zusammengefasst. Für den Diagnoseprozess soll ein evidenzbasierter Algorithmus verwendet werden, der mit der Abschätzung der klinischen Wahrscheinlichkeit beginnt. Unter Berücksichtigung des D‑Dimer-Tests kann die Notwendigkeit für die nachfolgende bildgebende Diagnostik reduziert werden. Bei der LE leitet die Stratifizierung entsprechend der Frühmortalität das weitere klinische Management. Die Messung von Laktat kann für diese Risikoeinschätzung hilfreich sein. Die Akuttherapie der venösen Thromboembolie (VTE) erfolgt intensiviert entweder mit parenteralen Antikoagulanzien oder erhöhten Dosierungen von Apixaban oder Rivaroxaban. Alle Patienten mit VTE sollten eine Erhaltungstherapie über 3–6 Monate erhalten, da bei einer Antikoagulation (AK) < 3 Monaten ein hohes Rezidivrisiko besteht. Die Dauer der anschließenden Sekundärprophylaxe richtet sich nach dem mutmaßlichen VTE-Rezidivrisiko einerseits und dem Blutungsrisiko andererseits. Weiterhin wird eine Kompressionstherapie zur Verhinderung des postthrombotischen Syndroms empfohlen, akut revaskularisierende Eingriffe sind Sonderfällen vorbehalten. Bei Adipositas bis 150 kg werden Standarddosen von Rivaroxaban und Apixaban als geeignet vorgeschlagen. Bei der krebsassoziierten Thromboembolie wird die bisherige Leitlinienempfehlung für niedermolekulare Heparine (NMH) über 3–6 Monate ergänzt durch die Empfehlung für Faktor-Xa-Inhibitoren, allerdings mit Vorsicht bei gastrointestinalen und urothelialen Tumoren oder erwarteten Wechselwirkungen mit der Antikrebstherapie. Hier und in instabilen Phasen werden NMH bevorzugt.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Cancer is a major risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) constitutes approximately 15-25% of all VTE cases. For decades, the standard treatment for CAT used to be daily subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Data on the safety and efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this population emerged only in recent years and specific DOACs were included into recent guidelines recommendations. In this narrative review of the literature, we reported the results of the phase III randomized controlled trials that evaluated the DOACs for the prevention and the acute treatment of CAT. For the acute phase treatment, the anti-Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) showed better efficacy than LMWH in preventing VTE recurrence; however, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were also associated with an increased risk of bleeding events. For primary prevention of CAT in ambulatory cancer patients starting chemotherapy, apixaban and rivaroxaban showed better efficacy than placebo but a trend towards higher bleeding rates. Recent guidelines suggest the DOACs for the treatment of CAT in selected cancer patients (eg, low bleeding risk, no luminal gastrointestinal or genitourinary malignancies, no interfering medications). The DOACs are also suggested for primary thromboprophylaxis in selected ambulatory cancer patients at high risk of VTE (eg, Khorana score ≥2 prior to starting new chemotherapy, low bleeding risk, no interfering medications).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban, for preventing and treating venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer is unclear.. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from the establishment to November 30, 2021. In the frequency-based network meta-analysis, the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was reported. The relative ranking probability of each group was generated based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).. We included 15 randomized controlled trials involving a total of 6162 patients. Apixaban reduced the risk of VTE compared with low-molecular heparin [OR = 0.53, 95% CI (0.32, 0.89)]. The efficacy of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: apixaban (SUCRA, 81.0), rivaroxaban (73.0), edoxaban (65.9), dabigatran (51.4), warfarin (30.8), and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (27.4). Edoxaban increased the risk of major bleeding compared with LMWH [OR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.04, 3.22)]. The safety of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: major bleeding-apixaban (SUCRA, 68.5), LMWH (55.1), rivaroxaban (53.0), warfarin (35.9), dabigatran (29.2), edoxaban (16.5) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding-LMWH (73.0), apixaban (57.8), edoxaban (45.8), rivaroxaban (35.3), and warfarin (10.8).. For preventing and treating VTE, in terms of VTE occurrence and major bleeding, apixaban had the lowest risk; in terms of clinically relevant non-major bleeding, LMWH had the lowest risk, followed by apixaban. Generally, apixaban is the most efficient and safest DOAC and presents better efficacy and relatively low bleeding risk among the VTE prevention and treatment drugs for patients with cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

This review article describes insights into the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) with direct factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) and refers in particular to the CALLISTO study program with rivaroxaban. CALLISTO includes randomized clinical trials on different topics as well as real-world evidence.Prevention and treatment of cancer-associated VTE have so far relied on low molecular weight heparins (LMWH). Meanwhile, randomized controlled trials have found comparable to superior efficacy of FXaI vs. LMWH, and the findings are now being incorporated into recommendations and guidelines. A possibly increased risk of bleeding, especially in patients with unresected gastrointestinal or urogenital tumors, should be considered. This was first observed during therapy with FXaI but can also affect LMWH. The selection of suitable patients and the optimization of treatment pathways are therefore of great importance.. Diese Übersichtsarbeit beschreibt Erkenntnisse zur Prävention und Therapie der tumorassoziierten venösen Thromboembolie (VTE) mit direkten Faktor-Xa-Inhibitoren (FXaI) und bezieht sich insbesondere auf das Studienprogramm CALLISTO mit Rivaroxaban. CALLISTO umfasst randomisierte klinische Prüfungen unterschiedlicher Fragestellungen sowie Real-World-Evidenz.Prävention und Therapie der tumorassoziierten VTE beruhten bisher auf niedermolekul1933aren Heparinen (NMH). Randomisierte kontrollierte Studien zeigten nun eine vergleichbare bis überlegene Wirksamkeit von FXaI vs. NMH. Die Erkenntnisse finden mittlerweile Eingang in Empfehlungen und Leitlinien. Zu beachten ist ein ggf. erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, vor allem bei Patienten mit nicht resezierten gastrointestinalen oder urogenitalen Tumoren. Dieses wurde bei der Therapie mit FXaI zuerst beobachtet, kann jedoch auch NMH betreffen. Der Selektion geeigneter Patienten und der Optimierung von Behandlungspfaden kommt daher eine hohe Bedeutung zu.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Moreover, management of VTE is frequently connected with complications, namely risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) therapy administrated for 3-6 months is currently considered a standard for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE (CA-VTE). Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban have emerged as a new possibility for long-term antithrombotic therapy for VTE. These agents expose several advantages in individuals with cancer, and might overcome several disadvantages connected with LMWH therapy.. First clinical studies with oral FXaI for the treatment of CA-VTE with very promising results were recently published. The article summarizes current data regarding the use of oral FXaI in the treatment of CA-VTE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now the first choice thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients who do not have a high risk of bleeding. In addition to the anticoagulant effects, potential anti-tumor effects of DOACs have also been studied in animal cancer models. In this study, we summarize the effects of DOACs on cancer growth and metastasis in animal models through a systematic review with a qualitative analysis.. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were systematically searched for original studies that describe animal models of cancer in which one of the experimental groups received DOAC monotherapy, and which reported quantitatively on primary tumor or metastases.. Nine studies - reporting a total of 19 animal experiments - met the inclusion criteria. These 19 experiments included spontaneous cancer (n = 2), carcinogenicity (n = 2), xenograft (n = 7) and syngeneic (n = 8) models, encompassing orthotopic (n = 7), subcutaneous (n = 5), intraperitoneal (n = 1) and intravenous (n = 2) injection of cancer cells and included treatments with the DOACs ximelagatran (n = 4), dabigatran etexilate (n = 6) and/or rivaroxaban (n = 11). DOAC treatment decreased tumor growth at implanted and metastatic site in 18.8% (3/16) and 20.0% (3/15) of the experiments, respectively. Conversely, DOACs increased tumor growth at implanted and metastatic site in 6.3% (1/16) and 20.0% (3/15) of the experiments, respectively.. DOAC monotherapy resulted in neoplastic changes in a rat carcinogenicity study, showed a lack of effect in mouse xenograft models, while the effect on cancer growth and metastasis in mouse syngeneic models depended on the timing of DOAC treatment and type of cancer model used.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Humans; Mice; Models, Animal; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rats; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants, anti-IIa or anti-Xa, are widely used in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic disease as well as in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants are characterized by a rapid onset of activity, a predictable response and a relatively wide therapeutic window. Nevertheless, theoretical drug interactions exist since direct oral anticoagulants are substrates of the transport protein P-glycoprotein and/or of isoforms of cytochromes P450 pathway. Direct oral anticoagulants do not have a marketing authorization for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis unlike low-molecular-weight heparins which remain the gold standard treatment today. However, recent studies have compared low-molecular-weight heparins to direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. Results of these studies showed a non-inferiority of direct oral anticoagulants in the prevention of recurrent thromboembolic events but at the cost of an increased hemorrhagic risk, in particular for patients with gastrointestinal and urogenital cancers. Thus, international guidelines, unlike French guidelines, integrate them in first line of the therapeutic strategy of cancer patients. We are certainly entering an era of personalized therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis, considering cancer type and also the theoretical risk of drug interactions with anti-cancer treatments or supportive care.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antineoplastic Agents; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasm Proteins; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication among patients with cancer that is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and health care costs. There is a significant lack of awareness among health care providers and patients leading to delays in seeking medical attention or diagnosis when signs and symptoms of suspected VTE occur as well as underappreciation of potential benefits of different thromboprophylaxis options. Clinical prediction rules (e.g. Khorana risk score) can be used by clinicians to stratify patients according to their underlying risk of VTE. Low-molecular-weight-heparin and direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban and apixaban) have been shown to be safe and effective thromboprophylactic options in this patient population. Health care providers should educate all patients regarding VTE and consider thromboprophylaxis in patients at higher risk of VTE complications. Decisions about thromboprophylaxis should be made with the patients and include a discussion about relative benefits and harms, costs and duration.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is often cited as a major cause of death and morbidity in cancer patients. Even a non-lethal VTE causes distress and is commonly perceived by patients as a set-back in the cancer journey and a threat to the cancer treatment. It is also known that the risk of VTE varies between cancers (cancer-related risk factors), between patients (patient-related risk factors), and also within the cancer journey of a single patient. Risk can increase during treatments like surgery and chemotherapy and decline during remission. Neither the low molecular weight heparins nor the vitamin K analogues have gained an established role in thromboprevention guidance other than in 'the high risk' patient, who remains a rather ambiguous entity. The recently published randomised studies of rivaroxaban and apixaban in moderate- to high-risk thrombosis patients, assigned by the Khorana Risk Score, has seen the inclusion of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in recent guidelines (e.g. the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2019 guidelines) for this indication. The ease of administration and the demonstrated greater patient adherence to oral agents has heightened the expectation that a practice-changing thromboprevention study in cancer patients should be realizable. However, key unmet needs that pose familiar challenges remain and as yet do not have satisfactory solutions. Anticoagulants carry risks of bleeding that are higher in the cancer population. There is therefore the challenge of sufficient risk reduction of VTE from the intervention balanced against the number of patients that may be harmed from bleeding. There is also the challenge of penetrating the risk threshold beyond which oncologists would deem thromboprevention a clinically meaningful praxis. Thus, identifying the high-risk groups of patients or targeting the length or timing of the thromboprevention to when the risks are highest are major questions that remain the subject of ongoing research. Notably all this is taking place against a backdrop of changing therapeutics for many cancers (e.g. targeted agents, checkpoint inhibitors and combinations) and their assorted impact on VTE incidence. In this review, past data for the ambulatory cancer patient are summarised, the latest evidence for the direct oral anticoagulants apixaban and rivaroxaban are analysed and the challenges of identifying the high-risk patients that have the greater chance of benefiting from thromboprophylaxis are discu

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Humans; Medical Oncology; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism remains an important but challenging aspect in the treatment of patients with cancer. Recently, alternatives to injection of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) have been introduced, the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which could potentially alleviate patients from burdensome daily injections.. This review discusses the available evidence exploring the role of NOACs in the treatment and secondary prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, from randomized trials, observational data, contemporary guideline recommendations, and patient perspectives.. Edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have proven attractive alternatives to LMWH for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Contemporary guidelines have promptly endorsed the use of NOACs in patients with most cancer types. Nonetheless, issues remain regarding bleeding risk, interactions with medical cancer treatment, and the effectiveness and safety for extended treatment periods. There are head-to-head comparisons of the NOACs, and therefore no data favoring the use of one NOAC over the others. Patient's preferences are highly diverse and should be part of routine considerations when weighing risks and benefits associated with various available anticoagulant drugs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Patients with cancer are at high risk of venous thromboembolic events, and this risk can be further increased in patients with certain cancer types and by cancer treatments. Guidelines on the prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) recommend thromboprophylaxis for hospitalised patients; however, this is not routinely recommended for ambulatory patients receiving chemotherapy and is limited to specified high-risk patients. Identification of the ambulatory patients at risk of CAT who would most benefit from anticoagulant therapy is therefore critical to reduce the incidence of this complication. For patients receiving thromboprophylaxis for CAT, treatment options include low molecular weight heparin, acetylsalicylic acid, warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (apixaban or rivaroxaban), dependent on the cancer type and cancer treatment regimen. This review discusses emerging clinical trial data and their potential clinical impact.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been largely -implemented in the management of venous thromboembolic disease in non-cancer patients. In cancer-associated thrombosis, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and especially dalteparin have long been the reference standard therapy. Following the publication of two randomised trials comparing edoxaban and rivaroxaban to -dalteparin, DOACs now represent an alternative with an interesting efficacy and safety profile. Moreover, they offer the comfort of an oral administration and a lower cost. In patients with gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancers however, a higher bleeding risk has been shown with DOACs. LMWHs thus remain the treatment of choice in this group of patients.. L’utilisation des anticoagulants oraux directs (ACOD) pour le traitement de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse (MTEV) chez les patients sans cancer est déjà largement implémentée. En cas de MTEV liée au cancer, les héparines de bas poids moléculaire (HBPM) et en particulier la daltéparine, ont longtemps ­représenté le traitement de référence. Suite à la publication de deux études randomisées récentes comparant l’édoxaban et le rivaroxaban à la daltéparine, les ACOD se sont révélés être une alternative efficace, avec un profil de sécurité satisfaisant, ­offrant par ailleurs le confort d’une administration orale et un coût moindre. Toutefois, en raison d’un risque hémorragique ­accru sous ACOD chez les patients avec un cancer de localisation digestive ou urogénitale, les HBPM restent le traitement de choix dans ce groupe de patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Approximately one-fifth of all cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are related to cancer and anticoagulant treatment in these patients has remained a challenge. Cancer patients with VTE are at increased risk of developing recurrent VTE compared to patients without cancer, but also have a higher risk of major bleeding. In these patients, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have been shown to be more effective and as safe as vitamin K-antagonists (VKAs) for the treatment of VTE. Therefore, the majority of current clinical guidelines recommend LMWHs as the treatment of choice for cancer-associated VTE. However, several issues should be considered regarding the use of LMWHs as daily subcutaneous injections, the costs or risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. In recent years, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown similar efficacy and better safety profile compared to VKAs and have become the standard of care for the treatment of VTE in the general population. Because DOACs offer a simple oral treatment regimen without the need for anticoagulation control, they could be an attractive alternative to LMWH. Before DOACs become an accepted treatment option for cancer associated VTE, they have to be evaluated in a head-to-head comparison with LMWH. Data from two randomized trials comparing DOACs vs. LMWH have recently been published. In the present review, we will provide three clinically relevant questions on the use of DOACs in patients with cancer and VTE and provide an overview on recent evidence on this topic: 1) are DOACs a treatment option for the prevention of VTE in cancer patients?; 2) what is the place for DOACs in patients with cancer-associated VTE?; 3) should I use DOACs for the extended treatment of cancer-related VTE?.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Cancer accounts for 20% of all venous thromboembolism (VTE) worldwide and cancer patients are at four- to sevenfold increased risk of thrombosis compared to non-cancer patients. VTE is also a morbid complication of cancer and its incidence is rising. Thrombosis is also a second leading cause of death in cancer patients. The standard of care management for the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) remains the administration of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). In the last decade, five direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban and betrixaban, have been approved for the treatment and prevention of VTE in the general patient population. In this review, we discuss the results of the already published clinical trials with DOACs in the treatment of CAT and the ongoing clinical trials with DOACs in the prevention and treatment of CAT.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzamides; Dabigatran; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Cancer patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) are at an elevated risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and of major bleeding while receiving treatment with anticoagulation. Recently, Xa inhibitors have been assessed in cancer patients for the treatment of CAT, providing clinicians and patients with more treatment options.. In this narrative review, the authors evaluate the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in the treatment of CAT.. Xa inhibitors are an effective, safe, and convenient option for the treatment of CAT. Overall, they may be associated with a lower risk of recurrent VTE in cancer patients. Certain subgroups of cancer patients may be at increased risk of major bleeding while on treatment with Xa inhibitors, when compared to low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH). The current published data suggests an increase in gastrointestinal (GI) major bleeding in patients with GI malignancies. Other patient, treatment, and cancer characteristics may also be associated with a higher risk of major bleeding. Therefore, when assessing the appropriateness of Xa inhibitors for the treatment of CAT, the clinician must take into consideration the known interactions of these drugs, the individualized bleeding risk, and the patient's preferences, in order to make the best possible anticoagulation therapy recommendation.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

While trials have demonstrated non-inferiority of direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOAC) to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) for the treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT), it is unclear if the newer intervention is cost-effective.. We performed a cost-utility analysis using a Markov state-transition model over a time horizon of 60 months in a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old patients with active malignancy and first acute symptomatic CAT who were eligible to receive either rivaroxaban/edoxaban or dalteparin. We obtained transition probability, relative risk, cost, and utility inputs from the literature. We estimated the differential impact on costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient and performed one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of results.. Using the base-case analysis over 60 months, DOAC versus dalteparin was associated with an incremental cost reduction of $24,129 with an incremental QALY reduction of 0.04. In the one-way sensitivity analysis, the cost of dalteparin contributed the most to the incremental cost difference; relative risk of death related to underlying cancer contributed the most of the incremental QALY difference. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the base-case analysis, with a large reduction in cost but small reduction in QALYs.. Rivaroxaban or edoxaban as compared to dalteparin is cost saving from a payer's perspective for the treatment of CAT. Professional organizations and healthcare systems may want to consider this analysis in future practice recommendations.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dalteparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thrombosis

Background Several studies have investigated the effect of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with cancer, but the results remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin in this population. Methods and Results We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until February 16, 2019 for studies comparing the effect of NOACs with warfarin in AF patients with cancer. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were extracted and pooled by a random-effects model. Five studies involving 8908 NOACs and 12 440 warfarin users were included. There were no significant associations between cancer status and risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death in AF patients. Compared with warfarin, NOACs were associated with decreased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.99), venous thromboembolism (RR, 0.37, 95% CI, 0.22-0.63), and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98) and with borderline significant reductions in ischemic stroke (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00) and major bleeding (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1.00). In addition, risks of efficacy and safety outcomes of NOACs versus warfarin were similar between AF patients with and without cancer. Conclusions In patients with AF and cancer, compared with warfarin, NOACs had lower or similar rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events and posed a reduced risk of venous thromboembolism.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

While not designated as guideline-recommended first-line anticoagulation therapy, about one in five patients in the United States receive rivaroxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT).. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the incidences of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and all-cause mortality in rivaroxaban patients treated for CAT in routine practice. Literature searches of MEDLINE and SCOPUS were performed through September 2017 to identify real-world studies of ≥ 20 patients evaluating the incidence of recurrent VTE, major bleeding, or all-cause mortality in CAT patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban. Using a Hartung-Knapp random-effects model, the pooled incidence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each end point.. Six studies evaluating rivaroxaban for CAT were identified. Of these, three were prospective and three were retrospective. Study sample sizes ranged from 41 to 949 patients, and duration of follow-up ranged from 164 to 496 days. The most frequent active cancer sites reported in studies were gastrointestinal (range: 12.0-56.0%), genitourinary (range: 8.6-26.0%), and breast (range: 9.3-25.5%). The weighted average incidences of recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were 4.2% (95% CI = 2.6-6.6%; I. This meta-analysis suggests that incidences of recurrent VTE and major bleeding among rivaroxaban-managed patients are not dissimilar to those seen in recent randomized trials of anticoagulation in CAT. The pooled incidence for mortality was lower than reported in many anticoagulation CAT trials. This may suggest that rivaroxaban is being used in CAT patients who have less severe cancer.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Neoplasms; Patient Discharge; Patient Selection; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Thiazoles

Although low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended as the first-line treatment in patients with active cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE), many patients are more willing to choose oral anticoagulants. We collected currently available data to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the oral direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin in patients with cancer and VTE.. We retrieved electric databases, including Medline/PubMed and EMBASE, from inception through January, 2018. We included articles comparing enoxaparin with rivaroxaban in patients with cancer and VTE. Recurrences of VTE, incidence of major bleeding and deaths were compared between groups. Poole analysis was conducted in Review Manager Version 5.2.. A total of 4 articles and 667 patients were included in the final analysis. Pooled analysis showed that rivaroxaban was associated with a non-significantly lower recurrence of VTE (risk ratio [RR] = 0.55, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.28-1.06, I = 0%). Patients treated with rivaroxaban had a similar major bleeding risk compared with those administrated with enoxaparin (RR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.39-1.83, I = 0%). No significant difference was observed in mortality between the 2 groups (RR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.15-1.80, I = 89%).. Rivaroxaban is as effective and safe as enoxaparin for the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with malignancy. Rivaroxaban is a potential option for patients with cancer and VTE.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were developed to compensate for the demerits of warfarin. In Japan, three factor Xa inhibitors are used for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE): edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Despite problems, such as the inability to monitor their effect and the lack of an antidote, these inhibitors have the same efficacy as conventional treatment with warfarin, and they are associated with a significantly high degree of safety in relation to hemorrhagic complications. East Asians, including Japanese, suffer from hemorrhage more frequently; therefore, DOACs are considered to be highly effective. Although there is no evidence to date, DOACs may be effective in a wide variety of ways, including the possibility that they prevent recurrence over the long term, reduce the length of hospitalization, allow treatment to be started on an outpatient basis, and be effective in cancer patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Japan; Neoplasms; Outpatients; Platelet Count; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at increased risk for both bleeding and VTE recurrence. Anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the standard of care during the initial and long-term treatment phase (i.e. during the first 3 - 6 months of therapy) based on its overall beneficial safety and efficacy profile compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran are approved for the treatment of acute VTE, and the combined six phase-3 trials have included > 1500 patients with active cancer, as defined by variable selection criteria. Subgroup analyses of these patients, either pooled or separately reported, suggest that DOACs could be a safe and efficacious alternative to VKA therapy for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. However, the populations of cancer patients included in the DOAC and LMWH trials are not comparable with regard to mortality and VTE risk, and no specific data from direct head-to-head comparisons of DOACs with LMWHs are currently available. The use of DOACs for the management of VTE in cancer is thus not recommended by clinical practice guidelines.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Guideline Adherence; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Long-Term Care; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are likely to have a major impact in the next few years, changing clinical practice of anticoagulation therapy. Evidence on its efficacy and superiority to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in treating non-cancer patients have been reported in a few clinical trials. However, patients with cancer are complicated by the prothrombotic nature of the disease, need for potentially invasive surgery and interventions, and altered drug handling. This chapter examines the available evidence and guidelines on the use of NOAC in patients with cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Catheters, Indwelling; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Dosage Calculations; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

The role of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in tumour growth and prognosis is not new, and currently under intense investigation. Some randomised data strongly suggest that this association exists, but it is complex, and not necessarily pointed at the same direction. The potential mechanisms responsible for such harmful association include a direct hazard of novel antithrombotics on cancer, indirect promotion of tumour growth, easier metastatic dissemination due to instability of platelet-tumour cell aggregates, or/and inability to keep cancer cells locally in situ are considered. The latest randomised evidence ultimately rejected the drug-specific cancer risks, clearly indicating the class-effect. In lay terms "cancers follow bleeding", which seems to be true for antithrombotic agents in general. Significant excess of solid cancers which was similar after prasugrel in TRITON, and with vorapaxar in TRACER trials was confirmed by the FDA reviews. Later, extra cancer deaths reported following clopidogrel and prasugrel in DAPT, and after ticagrelor in PEGASUS are also of concern. However, there are remaining controversies with regard to published cancer risks after ticagrelor (PLATO), or another vorapaxar trial (TRA2P), while full disclosure of separate clopidogrel and prasugrel cancer data in DAPT is still lacking. In short, if we apply moderate antiplatelet strategies for over two years, or aggressive regimens including triple therapy for much less than one year, the solid cancer risks emerge. Currently, more delicate platelet inhibition, and shorter exposure to dual oral antiplatelet agents should prevail.

Topics: Adenosine; Animals; Anticarcinogenic Agents; Aspirin; Blood Platelets; Carcinogenicity Tests; Clopidogrel; Colonic Neoplasms; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Lactones; Male; Mice; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Experimental; Neoplastic Cells, Circulating; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Species Specificity; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients is challenging, owing to a high risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding complications. The anticoagulants of choice are low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), because of a proven higher efficacy than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and a similar bleeding profile. The recently introduced new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have the potential to be alternative options for these patients, as these drugs share practical advantages with LMWH, are administered orally, and had similar efficacy to VKAs but a lower bleeding risk in phase 3 studies in the general VTE population.. A systematic literature search was performed to identify phase 3 trials investigating NOACs for the treatment of VTE. The efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE, and the safety outcome was major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Pooled incidence rates and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for cancer patients and non-cancer patients separately.. Five studies were included, with 19 060 patients, of whom 973 (5.1%) had active cancer. The pooled incidence rates of recurrent VTE were 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-6.0) in cancer patients treated with NOACs, and 6.1% (95% CI 4.1-8.5) in patients treated with VKAs (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.38-1.2). The pooled incidence rates of major or non-major clinically relevant bleeding were 15% (95% CI 12-18) in cancer patients treated with NOACs, and 16% (95% CI 9.9-22) in patients treated with VKAs (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.70-1.3). These results form a solid basis for the initiation of a head-to-head comparison of NOACs with LMWH in cancer patients.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

For decades the antithrombotic management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was limited to parenteral heparin formulations and oral vitamin K antagonists. Even though both classes of anticoagulants are effective, they have several limitations, including a narrow therapeutic window and the need to monitor anticoagulant activity. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that specifically target factor IIa or Xa have emerged. Recent data suggest that they are at least as effective and as safe as conventional therapy and have practical advantages, such as fixed dose regimen and no need for laboratory monitoring. Hence, they represent a major step forward in the acute treatment and long-term prevention of VTE. In this review, we outline the use of DOACs in the management of VTE and provide an overview of recently published major trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a common source of morbidity and mortality among patients with malignant disease. In this specific setting, the treatment of VTE is challenging as cancer patients display a high tendency to develop recurrent VTE, as well as anticoagulant-related bleeding complications. Low-molecular-weight heparins have been demonstrated to be more effective in the long-term prevention of recurrent VTE in cancer patients compared with conventional treatment with vitamin K antagonists. A limitation of this therapeutic approach includes the long-term requirement of daily subcutaneous injections, which may be burdensome to patients. Over the past decade, several novel oral anticoagulants have emerged, which can be administered in fixed doses without the need for monitoring. Clinical trials evaluating these agents for treatment in the general VTE population yielded promising results. This review summarizes the current management of cancer-associated VTE, overviews the trials that investigated the novel anticoagulant drugs for the treatment of acute VTE and discusses the potential of these novel agents for use in cancer patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The use of antithrombotic drugs for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing surgery is presently based on solid principles and high-level scientific evidence. This article reviews current strategies of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. The level of VTE risk following surgery depends on a variety of factors that the surgeon should take into account, including the type of surgery and the presence of additional risk factors, such as elderly age and cancer. In patients undergoing minor general surgery, early mobilization is sufficient as prophylaxis, whereas in those undergoing major general surgery, thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), low-dose unfractionated heparin, or the pentasaccharide fondaparinux is recommended. Patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery have a particularly high risk of VTE, and routine thromboprophylaxis with LMWH, fondaparinux, or a vitamin K antagonist (international normalized ratio target: 2.0 to 3.0) is the standard of care in this group of patients. Recently, two new oral anticoagulants, rivaroxaban (a factor Xa inhibitor) and dabigatran etexilate (a direct thrombin inhibitor) have been licensed to be used for thromboprophylaxis after orthopedic surgery in Europe. Mechanical methods of thromboprophylaxis (compression stockings, intermittent pneumatic compression, vena cava filters), not discussed in detail in this review, should always be considered in patients at high thrombotic risk, in association with the pharmacological strategies, or in cases of contraindications to anticoagulants, as in patients or procedures at high risk of bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Arthroscopy; Bariatric Surgery; Benzimidazoles; Blood Coagulation Disorders, Inherited; Dabigatran; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Hip Fractures; Humans; Kidney; Knee; Laparoscopy; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Orthopedic Procedures; Polysaccharides; Postoperative Complications; Pyridines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Venous Thromboembolism

Acutely ill medical patients are at moderate to high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE): approximately 10-30% of general medical patients may develop deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, and the latter is a leading contributor to deaths in hospital. Medical conditions associated with a high risk of VTE include cardiac disease, cancer, respiratory disease, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatological and infectious diseases. Pre-disposing risk factors in medical patients include a history of VTE, history of malignancy, complicating infections, increasing age, thrombophilia, prolonged immobility and obesity. Hence active cancer and a history of cancer are both strongly related to VTE in medical (non-surgical) patients. Heparins, both unfractionated (UFH) and low molecular weight (LMWH) and fondaparinux have been shown to be effective agents in prevention of VTE in this setting. However, it has not yet been possible to demonstrate a significant effect on mortality rates in this population. In medical patients, unfractionated heparin has a higher rate of bleeding complications than low molecular weight heparin. Thromboprophylaxis has been shown to be effective in medical patients with cancer and may have an effect on cancer outcomes. Thromboprophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy remains controversial and requires further investigation. There is no evidence for the use of aspirin, warfarin or mechanical methods. We recommend either low molecular weight heparin or fondaparinux as safe and effective agents in the thromboprophylaxis of medical patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Polysaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Cancer-associated thrombosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although anticoagulation remains the mainstay for prevention and treatment of thrombosis, current anticoagulants are problematic in cancer patients. Parenteral anticoagulants, such as heparin or low-molecular heparin, require daily subcutaneous injection, whereas warfarin requires coagulation monitoring and frequent dose adjustments. Idrabiotaparinux, a reversible long-acting pentasaccharide, and new oral anticoagulants, such as dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban and apixaban, have been designed to replace warfarin for extended prevention or treatment of VTE. Clinical trials with these agents have yielded promising results, and dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban are already licensed in many countries for thromboprophylaxis after elective hip or knee replacement surgery. In the coming years, these drugs are likely to replace warfarin for most indications. This paper addresses their potential role for prevention and treatment of cancer-related thrombosis.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; Biotin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Oligosaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombosis

For more than 50 years, heparin and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been the anticoagulant drugs used to prevent and treat thrombosis. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are more recent and have been available for approximately 20 years. Patients with cancer are members of a unique patient population because of their high risk for thrombosis and the risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding. With the currently available antithrombotic agents, patients with cancer still have unmet needs in terms of the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. Although long-term LMWH is the treatment of choice for patients with cancer who have acute, symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), some patients still experience recurrent VTE. More effective antithrombotic agents are needed for such patients. Convenient (ie, oral and with no laboratory monitoring), effective, and safe agents are needed to prevent thrombosis in patients taking chemotherapy and antiangiogenic drugs and in patients with central vein catheters. There are a number of new antithrombotic agents that have been studied in recent years and will soon be available for certain diseases. They target either activated factor X (ie, factor Xa) or activated thrombin, and some of them have potential therapeutic value in patients with cancer. In this article, the clinical research model used for the development of a new antithrombotic agent is discussed along with the results of recent trials that evaluate these new agents in high-risk populations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Analysis; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin for treating cancer-associated VTE.. Is rivaroxaban as efficient and safe as dalteparin to treat patients with cancer-associated VTE?. In a randomized open-label noninferiority trial, patients with active cancer who had proximal DVT, pulmonary embolism (PE), or both were assigned randomly to therapeutic doses of rivaroxaban or dalteparin for 3 months. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE, a composite of symptomatic or incidental DVT or PE, and worsening of pulmonary vascular or venous obstruction at 3 months.. Of 158 randomized patients, 74 and 84 patients were assigned to receive rivaroxaban and dalteparin, respectively. Mean age was 69.4 years, and 115 patients (76.2%) had metastatic disease. The primary outcome occurred in 4 and 6 patients in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively (both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations: cumulative incidence, 6.4% vs 10.1%; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.21-2.66). Major bleeding occurred in 1 and 3 patients in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively (cumulative incidence, 1.4% vs 3.7%; SHR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.04-3.43). Major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 9 and 8 patients in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively (cumulative incidence, 12.2% vs 9.8%; SHR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.49-3.26). Overall, 19 patients (25.7%) and 20 patients (23.8%) died in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.56-1.97).. In this trial comparing rivaroxaban and dalteparin in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE, the number of patients was insufficient to reach the predefined criteria for noninferiority, but efficacy and safety results were consistent with those previously reported with DOACs. An updated meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing DOACs with low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer-associated VTE is provided.. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02746185; URL: www.. gov.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Anticoagulant treatment of pediatric cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been prospectively evaluated. Management of anticoagulation for cancer-associated VTE is often challenged by drug interactions and treatment interruptions. A total of 56 of the 500 children (11.2%) with VTE who participated in the recent EINSTEIN-Jr randomized study had cancer (hematologic malignancy, 64.3%, solid malignant tumor, 35.7%). Children were allocated to either therapeutic-dose bodyweight-adjusted oral rivaroxaban (n=40) or standard anticoagulation with heparins, with or without vitamin K antagonists (n=16) and received a median of 30 concomitant medications. Based on sparse blood sampling at steady-state, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of rivaroxaban were derived using population PK modeling. During the 3 months of treatment, no recurrent VTE or major bleeding occurred (95% confidence interval, 0.0%-6.4%), and 3-month repeat imaging showed complete or partial vein recanalization in 20 and 24 of 52 evaluable children (38.5% and 46.2%, respectively). Anticoagulant treatment was interrupted 70 times in 26 (46.4%) children because of thrombocytopenia, invasive procedures, or adverse events, for a mean individual period of 5.8 days. Anticoagulant therapy was resumed in therapeutic doses and was not associated with thrombotic or bleeding complications. Rivaroxaban exposures were within the adult exposure range and similar to those observed in children with VTE who did not have cancer-associated VTE. Rivaroxaban and standard anticoagulants appeared safe and efficacious and were associated with reduced clot burden in most children with cancer-associated VTE, including those who had anticoagulant treatment interruptions. Rivaroxaban exposures were within the adult exposure range despite significant polypharmacy use. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02234843.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Child; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The Anticoagulation Therapy in Selected Cancer Patients at Risk of Recurrence of Venous Thromboembolism (SELECT-D) trial demonstrated reduction in recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) but increased bleeding with rivaroxaban compared with dalteparin for treatment of acute VTE in cancer patients, at 6 months. Uncertainty remains around optimal duration of anticoagulation.. To assess VTE recurrence and bleeding, with anticoagulation or not, beyond 6 months.. In SELECT-D, after 6 months of trial treatment for VTE, patients with active cancer and residual deep vein thrombosis (RDVT) or index pulmonary embolism (PE) were eligible for randomization to a further 6 months of rivaroxaban or placebo. Patients with no RDVT stopped anticoagulation. Primary outcome was VTE recurrence at 12 months. The second randomization closed prematurely because of low recruitment when 92 of the planned 300 patients were recruited.. Ninety-two of 136 eligible patients were randomized to rivaroxaban or placebo. The cumulative VTE recurrence after 6 months from the second randomization was 14% with placebo and 4% with rivaroxaban (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-1.58). The major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding rates were 0% and 0% with placebo; and 5% (95% CI, 1-18) and 4% (95% CI, 1-17) with rivaroxaban. In an exploratory analysis, 7 (15%) of 46 placebo patients with RDVT or an index PE experienced recurrent VTE compared to none in the 35 patients in the RDVT-negative cohort (P = .03).. The SELECT-D trial was underpowered to detect a statistically significant reduction in recurrent VTE with extended anticoagulation. The absence of RDVT and/or index PE, defined a population at low risk of recurrence.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Humans; Neoplasms; Random Allocation; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Cancer is a frequent finding in ischaemic stroke patients. The frequency of cancer amongst participants in the NAVIGATE ESUS randomized trial and the distribution of outcome events during treatment with aspirin and rivaroxaban were investigated.. Trial participation required a recent embolic stroke of undetermined source. Patients' history of cancer was recorded at the time of study entry. During a mean follow-up of 11 months, the effects of aspirin and rivaroxaban treatment on recurrent ischaemic stroke, major bleeding and all-cause mortality were compared between patients with cancer and patients without cancer.. Amongst 7213 randomized patients, 543 (7.5%) had cancer. Of all patients, 3609 were randomized to rivaroxaban [254 (7.0%) with cancer] and 3604 patients to aspirin [289 (8.0%) with cancer]. The annual rate of recurrent ischaemic stroke was 4.5% in non-cancer patients in the rivaroxaban arm and 4.6% in the aspirin arm [hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.24]. In cancer patients, the rate of recurrent ischaemic stroke was 7.7% in the rivaroxaban arm and 5.4% in the aspirin arm (HR 1.43, 95% CI 0.71-2.87). Amongst cancer patients, the annual rate of major bleeds was non-significantly higher for rivaroxaban than aspirin (2.9% vs. 1.1%; HR 2.57, 95% CI 0.67-9.96; P for interaction 0.95). All-cause mortality was similar in both groups.. Our exploratory analyses show that patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source and a history of cancer had similar rates of recurrent ischaemic strokes and all-cause mortality during aspirin and rivaroxaban treatments and that aspirin appeared safer than rivaroxaban in cancer patients regarding major bleeds. www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02313909).

Topics: Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Ischemic Stroke; Neoplasms; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening disease. Target-specific anticoagulant rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that can be safely used without laboratory monitoring.. To investigate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism in real-world clinical practice.. This was a semiretrospective, semiprospective, and real-world trial involving 128 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism with or without active tumor or frailty. We compared rivaroxaban to the standard therapy consisting of low-molecular-weight heparin combined with warfarin. The primary efficacy outcome was absorption of thrombus. The principal safety outcome was bleeding episode.. There was no significant difference in thrombus absorption between rivaroxaban and standard therapy after 3-month treatment (. In this real-world study, the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban alone was not different to standard therapy for pulmonary emboli absorption. With an extension in treatment duration, the rivaroxaban regimen had a higher efficacy and safety than standard therapy and there was no decline in treatment efficacy when the rivaroxaban dose was reduced to 10 mg once daily.

Topics: Female; Frailty; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In the 'Comparison of an Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor With Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Patients With Cancer With Venous Thromboembolism' (SELECT-D) trial, rivaroxaban showed relatively low venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence but higher bleeding compared with dalteparin in patients with cancer. We aim to calculate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of rivaroxaban compared with dalteparin in patients with cancer at risk of recurrent VTE.. We built a Markov model to calculate the cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective over a 5-year time horizon for the Dutch healthcare setting.. A hypothetical cohort of 1000 cancer patients with VTE entered the model with baseline characteristics based on the SELECT-D trial.. Six months of treatment with rivaroxaban (15 mg two times per day for first 3 weeks followed by 20 mg once daily) was compared with 6 months of treatment with dalteparin (200 IU/kg daily during month 1 followed by 150 IU/kg daily).. The primary outcome of the cost-effectiveness analysis was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The robustness of the model was evaluated in probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses. A budget impact analysis was performed to calculate the total annual financial consequences for a societal perspective in the Netherlands.. In the base case and all scenarios, rivaroxaban were cost-saving while also slightly improving the patient's health, resulting in economically dominant ICERs. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, 77.8% and 98.7% of the simulations showed rivaroxaban to be cost-saving and more effective for a 5-year and 6-month time horizon, respectively. Rivaroxaban can save up to €11 326 763 (CI €5 164 254 to €17 363 231) in approximately 8000 cancer patients with VTE per year compared with dalteparin based on a 1-year time horizon.. Treatment with rivaroxaban is economically dominant over dalteparin in patients with cancer at risk for recurrent VTE in the Netherlands. The use of rivaroxaban instead of dalteparin can save over €10 million per year, primarily driven by the difference in drug costs.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dalteparin; Female; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; Netherlands; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Patients treated with antithrombotic drugs are at risk of bleeding. Bleeding may be the first manifestation of underlying cancer.. We examined new cancers diagnosed in relation to gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding among patients enrolled in the COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) and determined the hazard of new cancer diagnosis after bleeding at these sites.. Of 27 395 patients enrolled (mean age, 68 years; women, 21%), 2678 (9.8%) experienced any (major or minor) bleeding, 713 (2.6%) experienced major bleeding, and 1084 (4.0%) were diagnosed with cancer during a mean follow-up of 23 months. Among 2678 who experienced bleeding, 257 (9.9%) were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. Gastrointestinal bleeding was associated with a 20-fold higher hazard of new gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis (7.4% versus 0.5%; hazard ratio [HR], 20.6 [95% CI, 15.2-27.8]) and 1.7-fold higher hazard of new nongastrointestinal cancer diagnosis (3.8% versus 3.1%; HR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.20-2.40]). Genitourinary bleeding was associated with a 32-fold higher hazard of new genitourinary cancer diagnosis (15.8% versus 0.8%; HR, 32.5 [95% CI, 24.7-42.9]), and urinary bleeding was associated with a 98-fold higher hazard of new urinary cancer diagnosis (14.2% versus 0.2%; HR, 98.5; 95% CI, 68.0-142.7). Nongastrointestinal, nongenitourinary bleeding was associated with a 3-fold higher hazard of nongastrointestinal, nongenitourinary cancers (4.4% versus 1.9%; HR, 3.02 [95% CI, 2.32-3.91]).. In patients with atherosclerosis treated with antithrombotic drugs, any gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding was associated with higher rates of new cancer diagnosis. Any gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding should prompt investigation for cancers at these sites.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01776424.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Neoplasms; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Anticoagulant therapy in patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism (VTE) increases the risk of both VTE recurrence and haemorrhagic complication. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been shown to be effective in preventing VTE recurrence, and comparable to conventional therapy in preventing VTE recurrence in patients with advanced cancer. Rivaroxaban is a DOAC that causes thrombus regression, possibly through a profibrinolytic effect. Thrombus regression with initial treatment is essential for VTE patients. However, the thrombolytic effect of DOAC for VTE patients with cancer has not been fully examined. Therefore, in this study, we investigate the thrombolytic effect of rivaroxaban in patients with cancer who develop VTE.. This study is a single-arm, open-label, prospective interventional study. Forty patients aged from 20 to 75 years old at the time of consent who have been diagnosed with acute VTE and have active cancer are included. Patients are excluded if they have received thrombolytic therapy, have creatinine clearance of less than 30 mL/min, have expected a life expectancy of less than 6 months or have deep vein thrombosis limited to the distal lower leg. Eligible patients receive standard treatment with rivaroxaban (15 mg two times daily for 3 weeks, followed by 15 mg QD). The primary study endpoint is clot regression ratio as evaluated by contrast-enhanced CT imaging. CT imaging is obtained at baseline, 21±4 and 90±14 days after the start of rivaroxaban treatment. Secondary endpoints are the recurrence of VTE and haemorrhagic complications.. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism; Young Adult

Limited data are available regarding the efficacy of rivaroxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of VTE in active cancer patients.. In this prospective, multicenter, open-label trial (NCT01989845), we enrolled patients with active cancer and objectively diagnosed lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), or both from November 2013 to June 2016. Active cancer was defined as a histologically confirmed malignancy, which was diagnosed or treated within the previous 6 months, or as a recurrent/ metastatic cancer. Patients received oral rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily for first 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily for 6 months. The primary outcome was the symptomatic recurrent VTE and the secondary outcomes included any recurrent VTE, major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding events, and overall mortality. All study outcomes were validated by blinded central adjudication.. Of 124 patients enrolled, 110 (88.7%) had solid cancer, 93 (75.0%) had metastatic disease, and 110 (88.7%) were receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. During the 6-month study period, seven patients experienced symptomatic recurrent VTE (cumulative incidence, 5.9%), and two patients experienced incidental recurrent PE (cumulative incidence of any recurrent VTE, 7.6%). Major bleeding events occurred in six patients (cumulative incidence, 5.3%) and CRNM bleeding events in 11 patients (cumulative incidence, 10.2%). Twenty-eight patients (overall mortality, 24.0%) died.. Rivaroxaban is effective and safe for the treatment of VTE in patients with active cancer.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Coagulation; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Recurrence; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

The management of anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer is challenging due to increased thrombotic and bleeding risks. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients with AF and a history of cancer.. ROCKET AF randomized 14 264 patients with AF to rivaroxaban or warfarin with a median follow-up of 1.9 years. Cox regression models were used to assess the association between cancer history and clinical outcomes, and the relative treatment effect of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in these patients. A total of 640 patients enrolled in ROCKET AF had a history of cancer, with the most common types being prostate (28.6%), colorectal (16.1%), and breast (14.7%) cancer. Patients with a history of cancer were older, more frequently male, more likely to have prior vitamin K antagonist (VKA) use and had higher rates of overall bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.47; P < 0.0001] and non-cardiovascular death (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.04-2.07; P = 0.031) compared with those with no cancer history. There were no significant associations between cancer history and stroke, venous thromboembolism, or myocardial infarction. The relative efficacy of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin for prevention of stroke/systemic embolism was similar in those with and without a history of cancer (interaction P-value = 0.21).. In ROCKET AF, a history of cancer was associated with a higher risk of bleeding and non-cardiovascular death, but not ischaemic events. The relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin were not significantly different in patients with and without a history of cancer. The results of this study are exploratory and should be taken in context of the study population, which may not be generalizable to those with advanced malignancy. Further investigation is needed to understand optimal anticoagulation strategies in patients with AF and cancer.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Cancer patients have a four- to fivefold greater risk of thrombosis than the general population. Recommended treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis is 3-6 months of low-molecular-weight heparin. The 'select-d' trial is an open-label, randomised, multi-centre pilot trial in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis, utilising dalteparin (low-molecular-weight heparin) versus rivaroxaban (a direct oral anticoagulant), to assess effectiveness and safety.. To explore patient and informal carers' experiences of cancer-associated thrombosis and their experience and understanding of the risk-benefit of thrombosis treatment.. Qualitative substudy of the select-d trial, using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis.. Participants were purposively sampled ( n = 37 patients; 46% male; age 40-89; 9 with carer present).. Three themes were found: experience of cancer-associated thrombosis, experience of anticoagulation and risk-benefit balance of the two modes of administration. Some were shocked by their thrombosis diagnosis (most were unaware of their risk), but others found it insignificant compared with cancer. Most patients found tablets more convenient, but injections were acceptable in the context of having cancer. While most were happy to follow medical advice, others weighed preference on the basis of effectiveness.. Lack of awareness of thrombosis risk is concerning; cancer patients must be informed to enable prompt help-seeking. Tablets could provide a welcome choice for patients if there is equivalent risk-benefit to injected anticoagulants. Patients trust their clinicians to tailor their treatment. Future research could explore the effect of routine information giving about the risk of thrombosis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Injections; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Patient Satisfaction; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thrombosis

Ambulatory patients receiving systemic cancer therapy are at varying risk for venous thromboembolism. However, the benefit of thromboprophylaxis in these patients is uncertain.. In this double-blind, randomized trial involving high-risk ambulatory patients with cancer (Khorana score of ≥2, on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of venous thromboembolism), we randomly assigned patients without deep-vein thrombosis at screening to receive rivaroxaban (at a dose of 10 mg) or placebo daily for up to 180 days, with screening every 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of objectively confirmed proximal deep-vein thrombosis in a lower limb, pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis in an upper limb or distal deep-vein thrombosis in a lower limb, and death from venous thromboembolism and was assessed up to day 180. In a prespecified supportive analysis involving the same population, the same end point was assessed during the intervention period (first receipt of trial agent to last dose plus 2 days). The primary safety end point was major bleeding.. Of 1080 enrolled patients, 49 (4.5%) had thrombosis at screening and did not undergo randomization. Of the 841 patients who underwent randomization, the primary end point occurred in 25 of 420 patients (6.0%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 37 of 421 (8.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 1.09; P = 0.10) in the period up to day 180. In the prespecified intervention-period analysis, the primary end point occurred in 11 patients (2.6%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 27 (6.4%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.80). Major bleeding occurred in 8 of 405 patients (2.0%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 4 of 404 (1.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.59 to 6.49).. In high-risk ambulatory patients with cancer, treatment with rivaroxaban did not result in a significantly lower incidence of venous thromboembolism or death due to venous thromboembolism in the 180-day trial period. During the intervention period, rivaroxaban led to a substantially lower incidence of such events, with a low incidence of major bleeding. (Funded by Janssen and others; CASSINI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02555878.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Autologous adoptive T cell immunotherapy has been recognized as an effective treatment for cancer patients. The initial qualified lymphocytes is the core element determining the immunotherapeutic outcomes clinically. Cell separator based apheresis procedure is an optimal procedure to collect adequate mono-nucleated lymphocytes to generate efficient ex vivo T cell expansions; however, potential catheter-associated femoral vein thrombosis at post-apheresis might rise an additional deteriorated morbidity for cancer patients. The emerging prophylactic medications are required at such circumstances. Therefore this study was designed to compare the prophylactic effects of rivaroxaban versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients who had exposed during the femoral vein catheterization for apheresis. 74 Patients were randomized 1:1:1 into three groups: subcutaneous injection of LMWH, Fraxiparine (n = 23) (0.4 ml, 3800 IU/day) for 2 days, oral rivaroxaban 10 mg/d (n = 26), and oral rivaroxaban 20 mg/d (n = 25) for consecutive 2 days. The primary endpoint was to compare the venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence cases in one month post catheterization. There were 4 cases confirmed VTE occurrence in LMWH group with contrast to 1 case in rivaroxaban 10 mg administration group. None was seen in rivaroxaban 20 mg group (P = 0.02 as the comparison with LMWH). Meantime there was no bleeding events occurrence afterwards. Oral rivaroxaban 20 mg/day was recommendable to be considered which superior to LMWH. Although these limited data and patient volume reached the statistical difference which was able to provide the evidence proofed to compare the potency of those two anticoagulants, it could be regarded as the preliminary data provide the clinical results for cancer patients who were placed in the condition of apheresis and subsequently undergone adoptive T cell immunotherapy.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03282643. Registered 16 February 2016, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov/ NCT03282643.

Topics: Adoptive Transfer; Adult; Aged; Blood Component Removal; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; T-Lymphocytes; Thrombosis

To provide direct comparison between apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients with acute cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (Ca-VTE), consecutive patients treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, or enoxaparin at Mayo Thrombophilia Clinic (March 1, 2013 to January 31, 2018)) were followed prospectively. The primary effectiveness outcome was venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence, and the secondary was mortality. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, the secondary clinically relevant safety outcome was non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and the third a composite of major and CRNMB. There were 750 patients treated for acute Ca-VTE with apixaban (n = 224), rivaroxaban (n = 163), and enoxaparin (n = 363) within 14 days of diagnosis and for at least 3 months, or until study event. Recurrent VTE was diagnosed in 11 receiving apixaban, 7 receiving rivaroxaban (apixaban vs rivaroxaban hazard ratio (HR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.51-3.36) and 17 in the enoxaparin receiving group (apixaban vs enoxaparin HR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.54, 2.42 and rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin HR 0.85, 95% Cl: 0.36, 2.06). There were 82 deaths in apixaban, 74 rivaroxaban (apixaban vs rivaroxaban HR 1.67, 95% Cl: 1.20, 2.33) and 171 in enoxaparin group (rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin HR 0.73, 95% Cl: 0.56, 0.96). Major bleeding occurred in 11 apixaban, 12 rivaroxaban (apixaban vs rivaroxaban HR 0.73, 95% Cl: 0.32, 1.66) and 21 enoxaparin group (apixaban vs enoxaparin HR 0.89, 95% Cl: 0.43, 1.84 and rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin HR 1.23, 95% Cl: 0.61, 2.50). The CRNMB rate was higher in rivaroxaban compared to apixaban (P = .03) and LMWH (P = .01) groups. Recurrence of VTE and major bleeding were similar in apixaban, rivaroxaban, and enoxaparin groups. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher CRNMB but lower mortality compared to apixaban and enoxaparin.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Propensity Score; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) have a two- to six-fold increased risk of anticoagulant-related major bleeding events compared with VTE patients without cancer. It is unknown whether major bleeding events are more severe in cancer patients than in those without cancer. Individual patient data from four randomized phase III trials that compared factor Xa inhibitors and vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of VTE were used to compare the severity of major bleeding events in patients with and without cancer. Using predefined criteria, the severity of the clinical presentation and course of major bleeding events were classified into four categories of increasing severity. A one-stage meta-analysis was used to evaluate the effect of cancer on the severity of the clinical presentation and course by estimating crude odds ratios (ORs) and ORs adjusted for age, sex and anticoagulant type with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study group comprised 290 patients with major bleeding, of whom 50 (17%) had cancer. The clinical presentation was judged to be severe (category 3 or 4) in 38% of patients with cancer and 44% of patients without cancer (adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.47-1.72). The clinical course was found to be severe in 20 and 25% of patients with and without cancer, respectively (adjusted OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.35-1.61). The present study suggests that the clinical presentation and course of anticoagulant-related major bleeding events are not more severe in cancer patients than in patients without cancer. This may be reassuring for physicians who treat cancer patients with anticoagulant-related bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Transfusion; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Odds Ratio; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Purpose Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with cancer. Long-term daily subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin has been standard treatment for such patients. The purpose of this study was to assess if an oral factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, would offer an alternative treatment for VTE in patients with cancer. Patient and Methods In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, pilot trial in the United Kingdom, patients with active cancer who had symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), incidental PE, or symptomatic lower-extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were recruited. Allocation was to dalteparin (200 IU/kg daily during month 1, then 150 IU/kg daily for months 2-6) or rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, then 20 mg once daily for a total of 6 months). The primary outcome was VTE recurrence over 6 months. Safety was assessed by major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB). A sample size of 400 patients would provide estimates of VTE recurrence to within ± 4.5%, assuming a VTE recurrence rate at 6 months of 10%. Results A total of 203 patients were randomly assigned to each group, 58% of whom had metastases. Twenty-six patients experienced recurrent VTE (dalteparin, n = 18; rivaroxaban, n = 8). The 6-month cumulative VTE recurrence rate was 11% (95% CI, 7% to 16%) with dalteparin and 4% (95% CI, 2% to 9%) with rivaroxaban (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.99). The 6-month cumulative rate of major bleeding was 4% (95% CI, 2% to 8%) for dalteparin and 6% (95% CI, 3% to 11%) for rivaroxaban (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 0.68 to 4.96). Corresponding rates of CRNMB were 4% (95% CI, 2% to 9%) and 13% (95% CI, 9% to 19%), respectively (HR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.63 to 8.69). Conclusion Rivaroxaban was associated with relatively low VTE recurrence but higher CRNMB compared with dalteparin.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pilot Projects; Rivaroxaban; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban is broadly used for the primary prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in the general population with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is little published evidence on the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for AF in patients with active cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients with active cancer and AF. The use of rivaroxaban in patients with cancer at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is monitored in the setting of a Quality Assessment Initiative. Patients with active cancer and AF, treated with rivaroxaban from January 1, 2014, to March 31, 2016, are included in this analysis. Clinical end points were defined a priori and assessed through text searches of medical records. A total of 163 evaluable patients were identified. After adjusting for competing risks, the estimated 1-year cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke was 1.4% (95% CI 0% to 3.4%) and major bleeding was 1.2% (95% CI 0% to 2.9%). The risk of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding leading to discontinuation of anticoagulation at 1 year was 14.0% (95% CI 4.2% to 22.7%). The cumulative incidence of mortality was 22.6% (95% CI 12.2% to 31.7%) at 1 year, reflecting an active cancer population. One patient died after developing an acute ischemic cerebrovascular insult. In conclusion, the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban treatment for nonvalvular AF in patients with active cancer is comparable to the results of the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) study in the general population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; New York; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication of cancer associated with morbidity, mortality, increased hospitalizations and higher health care costs. Cancer patients at increased risk for VTE can be identified using a validated risk assessment score, and the incidence of VTE can be reduced in high-risk settings using anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban is a potent, oral, direct, factor Xa inhibitor approved for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events, including VTE. CASSINI is a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre study comparing rivaroxaban with placebo in adult ambulatory patients with various cancers who are initiating systemic cancer therapy and are at high risk of VTE (Khorana score ≥ 2). Patients with primary brain tumours or those at risk for bleeding are excluded. Approximately 700 patients will be randomized 1:1 to rivaroxaban 10 mg daily or placebo for up to 6 months if there is no evidence of VTE from compression ultrasonography (CU) during screening or from routine care imaging within 30 days prior to randomization. Mandatory CU will also be performed at weeks 8 and 16 (±7 days), and at study end (±3 days). The primary efficacy hypothesis is that anticoagulation with rivaroxaban reduces the composite of objectively confirmed symptomatic or asymptomatic, lower-extremity, proximal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT); symptomatic, upper-extremity DVT; symptomatic or incidental pulmonary embolism; and VTE-related death compared with placebo. The primary safety objective is to assess major bleeding events (Clinical trial information: NCT02555878).

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; North America; Pulmonary Embolism; Research Design; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

The study aim was to identify predictive factors for major bleeding in patients receiving the novel oral factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban or enoxaparin-vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the treatment of acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism. We analysed data from patients included in the phase III EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies. Factors associated with major bleeding events were assessed with best subset variable selection using Cox proportional hazards regression model. Three time windows were considered, i.e. the initial three weeks, after the third week onwards, and the entire duration of the anticoagulant treatment. Model discrimination was estimated using the C-statistic and validated internally by bootstrap techniques. Major bleeding occurred in 40 (1.0%) of 4130 patients receiving rivaroxaban and in 72 (1.7%) of 4116 receiving enoxaparin/VKAs, with 44% of the major bleeding events occurring in the first three weeks of treatment. Significant risk factors for major bleeding were older age, black race, low haemoglobin concentrations, active cancer, and antiplatelet or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy. The discrimination of the model for major bleeding was high for the first three weeks (C-statistic 0.73), from the fourth week onwards (C-statistic 0.68), and the entire period of anticoagulant treatment (C-statistic 0.74). This analysis identified risk factors for major bleeding in patients receiving the novel oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban or enoxaparin/VKAs for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. The prognostic model based on the combination of identified risk factors may be informative to estimate the risk of major bleeding both during the initial and later phases of anticoagulation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Black or African American; Blood Coagulation; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemoglobins; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Regression Analysis; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

The increased risk of thrombosis and bleeding with an active tumor disease is known as the so-called "thrombo-hemorrhagic syndrome", which places high demands on anticoagulation. There are currently 4 randomized, prospective studies on the use of new, non-vitamin K dependent oral anticoagulants (NOAC) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) that have occurred in oncology. The FXa inhibitors rivaroxaban, edoxaban and twice apixaban were each used in individual studies versus the standard therapeutic agent dalteparin. Since there is no direct head-to-head comparison of the FXa inhibitors mentioned within a study, the largest study - always compared to dalteparin - was evaluated for each NOAC. The studies were analyzed with regard to their effectiveness, safety, fatal bleeding rates, the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and other differences using descriptive statistics. With dalteparin, the mean VTE recurrence rate was approximately 9% over a 6-month treatment period. All three FXa inhibitors were not inferior to dalteparin in terms of potency. The VTE recurrence rate was - 2.3% lower in edoxaban and apixaban-treated patients and - 5.0% in rivaroxaban-treated patients. In terms of safety, there was an increased rate of severe bleeding (both + 2.4%) for rivaroxaban and edoxaban compared to dalteparin; in particular, the number of GIBs was significantly increased. In contrast, the number of severe bleeding was not increased for apixaban, as was the case for various bleeding types including GIB. In the Apixaban study, the overall rate of severe GIB, which accounted for about 50% of all severe bleeding, and that of clinically relevant non-severe bleeding, were the lowest. The FXa inhibitors are not inferior to the standard therapy with dalteparin in the VTE recurrence rate in oncological patients. The GIB rate appears to be an important predictive factor for the safety of this group of substances, so that tumor location, gastrointestinal risk factors and other individual criteria should be given greater consideration in future therapy decisions for or against an FXa inhibitor.. Das erhöhte Thrombose- und Blutungsrisiko bei aktiver Tumorerkrankung wird als sog. „thrombo-hämorrhagisches Syndrom“ bezeichnet, welches hohe Anforderungen an die Antikoagulation stellt. Aktuell liegen 4 randomisierte, prospektive Studien zum Einsatz von neuen, nicht Vitamin K-abhängigen oralen Antikoagulantien (NOAK) zur Behandlung von in der Onkologie aufgetretenen venösen Thromboembolien (VTE) vor. Dabei wurden die FXa-Inhibitoren Rivaroxaban, Edoxaban und zweimal Apixaban jeweils in einzelnen Studien gegenüber dem Standardtherapeutikum Dalteparin eingesetzt. Da es keinen direkten Head-to-Head-Vergleich der genannten FXa-Inhibitoren innerhalb einer Studie gibt, wurde zu jedem NOAK die jeweils größte Studie – stets verglichen gegenüber Dalteparin – ausgewertet. Die Studien wurden bzgl. ihrer Wirksamkeit, Sicherheit, fataler Blutungsraten, dem Risiko für gastrointestinale Blutungen (GIB) und sonstiger Unterschiede anhand deskriptiver Statistik analysiert. Unter Dalteparin ergab sich eine mittlere VTE-Rezidivrate von ca. 9% bei einem 6-monatigen Behandlungszeitraum. Alle 3 FXa-Inhibitoren waren gegenüber Dalteparin bezüglich der Wirksamkeit nicht unterlegen. Die VTE-Rezidivrate war bei mit Edoxaban und Apixaban behandelten Patienten um – 2,3% und bei Rivaroxaban um – 5,0% niedriger.Bei der Sicherheit fanden sich – jeweils gegenüber Dalteparin – für Rivaroxaban und Edoxaban eine erhöhte Rate an schweren Blutungen (jeweils +2,4%); insbesondere war hierbei die Zahl GIB deutlich erhöht. Dagegen war für Apixaban die Zahl schwerer Blutungen, wie auch für verschiedene Blutungstypen inkl. GIB, nicht erhöht. In der Apixabanstudie war insgesamt die Rate von schweren GIB, die ca. 50% aller schweren Blutungen ausmachten, und die der klinisch-relevanten nicht schweren Blutungen, am niedrigsten. Die FXa-Inhibitoren sind der Standardtherapie mit Dalteparin in der VTE-Rezidivrate bei onkologischen Patienten nicht unterlegen. Die GIB-Rate scheint ein wichtiger prädiktiver Faktor für die Sicherheit dieser Substanzgruppe zu sein, sodass Tumorlokalisation, gastrointestinale Risikofaktoren und andere individuelle Kriterien in Zukunft stärker bei der Therapieentscheidung für oder gegen einen FXa-Inhibitor berücksichtigt werden sollten.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Data on the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and active cancer are limited in the Japanese real-world setting.. In this subanalysis of the J'xactly study, which was a multicenter, prospective, observational study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with acute VTE and active cancer (n = 193) versus those without active cancer (n = 823).. Compared with patients without active cancer, those with active cancer demonstrated a significantly different age distribution, with fewer aged <65 and ≥75 years; a lower proportion of women; a lower mean body mass index; and a lower proportion of physical inactivity, injury, thrombophilia, and heart failure. There was no difference in the initial dose distribution of rivaroxaban between patients with and without active cancer. The incidences of recurrence or aggravation of symptomatic VTE and major bleeding were not significantly different [VTE: 1.44 % vs. 2.80 % per patient-year, hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.18-1.39, p = 0.172; major bleeding: 4.49 % vs. 2.55 % per patient-year, HR 1.80, 95 % CI 0.82-3.95, p = 0.137]. Approximately 10 % of patients with active cancer died at 6 months, with a significantly higher cumulative all-cause mortality rate than those without active cancer (23.29 % vs. 2.03 % per patient-year, HR 11.31, 95 % CI 7.30-17.53, p < 0.001).. In patients with VTE and active cancer, rivaroxaban showed acceptable effectiveness, although clinically significant bleeding remains a concern.. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000025072.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Central venous catheters are prone to clotting, particularly in patients with cancer. Although low-molecular-weight heparin and direct oral anticoagulants, such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, have been evaluated for the prevention of catheter thrombosis, their efficacy remains uncertain.. Compare apixaban and rivaroxaban with enoxaparin for the prevention of catheter-induced clotting in vitro.. To address this uncertainty, we used a well-established microplate-based assay to compare the effects of enoxaparin, apixaban, and rivaroxaban on catheter-induced thrombosis and thrombin generation in human plasma.. Consistent with our previous findings, catheter segments shortened the clotting time and promoted thrombin generation. When compared at concentrations with similar anti-factor Xa activity as enoxaparin, apixaban and rivaroxaban were >20-fold less potent than enoxaparin for the prevention of catheter-induced clotting and thrombin generation.. The prevention of catheter thrombosis in patients with cancer is challenging. Clinical trials are needed to compare the efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin with that of direct oral anticoagulants both for the prevention and treatment of catheter thrombosis.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Catheters; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thrombin; Thrombosis

Rivaroxaban is a viable anticoagulant for the management of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE). A previously verified physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of rivaroxaban established how its multiple pathways of elimination via both CYP3A4/2J2-mediated hepatic metabolism and organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3)/P-glycoprotein-mediated renal secretion predisposes rivaroxaban to drug-drug-disease interactions (DDDIs) with clinically relevant protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs). We proposed the application of PBPK modelling to prospectively interrogate clinically significant DDIs between rivaroxaban and PKIs (erlotinib and nilotinib) for dose adjustments in CA-VTE.. The inhibitory potencies of the PKIs on CYP3A4/2J2-mediated metabolism of rivaroxaban were characterized. Using prototypical OAT3 inhibitor ketoconazole, in vitro OAT3 inhibition assays were optimized to ascertain the in vivo relevance of derived transport inhibitory constants (K. Mechanism-based inactivation (MBI) of CYP3A4-mediated rivaroxaban metabolism by both PKIs and MBI of CYP2J2 by erlotinib were established. The importance of substrate specificity and nonspecific binding to derive OAT3-inhibitory K. We established a PBPK-DDDI model to prospectively evaluate clinically relevant interactions between rivaroxaban and PKIs for the safe and efficacious management of CA-VTE.

Topics: Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Drug Interactions; Erlotinib Hydrochloride; Humans; Ketoconazole; Models, Biological; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now an option in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in patients with active cancer. Pharmacokinetics of DOACs are largely influenced by efflux transporters derived from ABC transporters, notably by P-glycoprotein (P-gp). The aim of this study was to assess the potential P-gp-mediated drug-drug interactions between 11 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with apixaban and rivaroxaban. Bidirectional permeabilities of apixaban and rivaroxaban were investigated across MDCK-MDR1 models, to determine half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Axitinib; Crizotinib; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Humans; Imatinib Mesylate; Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

Primary and recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) commonly occur in patients with cancer. However, because of the National Health Insurance regulations, available dosage forms, and clinical conditions, the prescribed dose of rivaroxaban may not be consistent with its recommended dose.. To evaluate the 6-month recurrence rate of VTE and safety of rivaroxaban for patients with cancer.. Patients with new cancer diagnosis or recurrence from 2014 to 2018 who initiated rivaroxaban for VTE from January 2015 to January 2019 were included. We set the rivaroxaban initiation date as the index date and followed up the patients for 180 days. We collected information regarding the starting and maintenance dose/frequency and the treatment duration. The efficacy outcome was the recurrence of VTE within 180 days. The safety outcome included the major bleeding rate and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) rate.. Approximately, 46.2% of the 65 included patients received a standard starting dose, and 45% of patients received a maintenance dose above 15 mg (median: 23.9 and 13.1 mg per day, respectively). Two-thirds of the patients stopped treatment within 180 days. Recurrent VTE occurred in 2 (3.1%) patients within 6 months. The major bleeding rate was 7.7%, and the CRNMB rate was 3.1%.. The 6-month recurrence rate of VTE and safety profile were similar between the lower and standard dose of rivaroxaban. This result may be applied to the institutions with dosage availability limited by formulary regulation and patients who cannot use full dose because of clinical considerations.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have recently proven their efficacy and safety, as primary and secondary prevention agents for thrombosis in cancer patients. We aimed to determine if DOACs might be a suitable choice to reduce the thrombotic risk in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients.. We analysed a large multicentric cohort of MPN patients treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban after atrial fibrillation (AF) or thrombotic events.. We included 135 MPN patients with a median follow-up of 23.8 months since DOAC initiation. Twenty patients (14.8 %) developed 30 thrombotic events (28 arterial thromboses in 19 patients) for a global incidence of 6.5 % patient-years. No difference was highlighted between apixaban and rivaroxaban in terms of thrombosis risk, but the incidence of arterial thrombosis was significantly higher on low-dose DOACs (11.9 vs. 4.5 % patient-years, p = 0.04). Bleeding events were more frequent in the full-dose group (41.2 vs. 15.2 %, p = 0.006). However, major and clinically relevant non major (CRNM) bleeding events occurred in 18 patients (13.3 %), with no difference between the groups. Age was the only identified thrombotic risk factor, whereas risk factors for major or CRNM bleeding were a full-dose treatment regimen and a combination of DOAC/low-dose aspirin.. DOACs seem effective in preventing venous thrombosis in MPN patients with AF or VTE. For these high-risk patients, low-dose DOACs exposed patients to more arterial thrombosis but fewer bleeding events. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate and compare DOACs to the currently recommended antithrombotic drugs for high-risk MPN patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

This is the first study examining real-life data of pediatric cancer patients treated with rivaroxaban. Children with thrombocytopenia and high bleeding risk were excluded from previous clinical trials. Data regarding the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in pediatric cancer-associated thrombosis are scarce. Our case series included 16 children aged 7.5-17 years. Thrombus resolution rate in our study was comparable to results of previous studies. However, higher rates of thrombotic and bleeding complications were seen in our study as compared to previous reports, especially among patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Child; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTD) is currently the second leading cause of death in cancer patients with a prevalence of approximately 20% compared with that of 5% in the entire adult population. Cancer patients are a heterogeneous group with significant differences in the risk of VTD which is, in particular, determined by the type of tumour, its extent, location, and the presence of metastases. Some tumours represent a mean 3- to 5-fold increase in risk, while in others the risk of developing VTD is even several times higher. In comparison with non-cancer patients, those with a tumour are not only at an increased risk of an initial thromboembolic event, but also of its recurrence, regardless of ongoing anticoagulation which is associated with a higher risk of bleeding, particularly in mucosal involvement. Venous thrombosis and its treatment may interfere with the ongoing diagnosis and treatment. In cancer patients, VTD is a frequent incidental finding on imaging studies. Primary thromboprophylaxis (apixaban, rivaroxaban, LMWH) is currently recommended in selected groups of cancer patients who are either hospitalized for acute internal disease or immobilized and have an active malignancy, undergo outpatient systemic chemotherapy for a tumour with a high risk of VTD (a Khorana score of 2) or surgery and are not at high risk of bleeding. DOACs should be administered six months after the initiation of chemotherapy. If there is a risk of drug interactions or mucosal bleeding, LMWHs are recommended. At present, DOACs (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) and LMWHs are the first-choice drugs in treating VTD. LMWHs are preferred in mucosal tumours, when there is a high risk of bleeding, in progressive malignancy, concomitant emetogenic therapy, and dyspeptic difficulties. In severe renal insufficiency (CrCl < 15 ml/min), vitamin K antagonists may be of value. Individualized treatment should take into consideration the patients general condition, prognosis, and personal preferences.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K

Rivaroxaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, is effective against venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence without increasing the risk of major bleeding in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT). However, its clot regression effects are poorly understood. This single-arm, prospective interventional study aimed to investigate the clot regression effects of rivaroxaban in 40 CAT patients, through a contrast-enhanced computed tomography at baseline, 3 weeks, and 3 months of rivaroxaban treatment. The primary endpoint was the clot-regression ratio calculated from the thrombus volumes at 3 weeks and 3 months. Compared with baseline, the total clot volume was significantly reduced at both 3 weeks and 3 months after initiation (p < 0.01). The clot-regression rates were statistically significant with 83.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.8-92.3%) at 3 weeks and 98.7% (95% CI, 97.1-100.2%) at 3 months, with complete resolution in 36.1% and 80.8% of patients at 3 weeks and 3 months, respectively. One patient had recurrent VTE after dose reduction, and seven had non-fatal major bleeding. Therefore, rivaroxaban had a sufficient clot-regression effect against CAT with caution of bleeding complication.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Kinase inhibitors (KI) and antibodies targeting the VEGF pathway are approved in a broad spectrum of cancers and associated with an increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events (TE). The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) apixaban and rivaroxaban is increasing in cancer patients, but limited data are available for patients receiving anti-VEGF agents.. To assess safety of DOAC with concomitant anti-VEGF agents, a retrospective chart review of all patients receiving concomitantly DOAC and anti-VEGF agents was performed from 2013 to 2020 in our center. Data on demographics, safety, and time on treatment were collected. Main outcome was safety (bleeding and thromboembolic events).. Of 92 patients (median age 66 years (IQR: 59-72)), 40 were treated with KI and 52 with bevacizumab. The most frequent primary tumor sites were colon/rectum (24%), kidney (21%), ovary (13%), lung (11%), soft tissue sarcoma (10%), and thyroid (9%); 2% had brain metastases. Apixaban 5 mg bid (n = 41) or rivaroxaban 20 mg daily (n = 51) were given for TE (65%), atrial fibrillation (32%), or other indications (3%). The median duration of concomitant treatment was 4.8 months (95%CI: 0.7-50.0) with bevacizumab and 11.7 months (95%CI: 0.1-53.8) with KI. Grade ≥ 3 bleeding events occurred in 5 patients (5%): 4 patients receiving bevacizumab (one grade 5 upper digestive tract bleeding and three grade 3 rectal or vaginal hemorrhages) and 1 patient under cabozantinib for kidney cancer with endobronchial metastasis (grade 3 hemoptysis). Grade ≥ 3 TE occurred in 8 patients (9%): 7 patients receiving bevacizumab (including one grade 5 pulmonary embolism), and one patient receiving sunitinib (grade 3 pulmonary embolism). Median time-to-event (bleeding or thrombotic event) was not reached (NR) (95%CI: 76.9-NR) for KI and 86.9 months (95%CI: 42.9-148.0) for bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In our experience, the use of DOAC was safe in selected patients treated with KI, but unclear with bevacizumab. More data are needed to endorse guidelines in this specific group of patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Bevacizumab; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Pulmonary Embolism; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

This study assesses the mortality outcomes of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation (AF).. Medical records of cancer patients receiving NOACs for VTE or AF between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, were retrieved from Taiwan's National Health Institute Research Database. NOACs were compared using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. The primary outcome was cancer-related death. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.. Among 202,754 patients who received anticoagulants, 3591 patients (dabigatran: 907; rivaroxaban: 2684) with active cancers were studied. Patients who received dabigatran were associated with lower risks of cancer-related death at one year (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54-0.93) and at the end of follow-ups (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64-0.98) compared with rivaroxaban. Patients who received dabigatran were also associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67-0.97), major bleeding (HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.47-0.88), and GI bleeding (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.39-0.84) at the end of follow-ups compared with rivaroxaban.. Compared with rivaroxaban, the use of dabigatran may be associated with a lower risk of cancer-related death and all-cause mortality.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Taiwan; Venous Thromboembolism

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) is a common disease or complication which is associated with reduced survival and incurring a substantial health-care cost. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) remained the gold standard treatment option available. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have recently become more popular in the guidelines, they are still few and inconsistent across the current literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate rivaroxaban in treatment of CAT.. In this prospective real-world study, we recruited and followed up patients diagnosed with CAT treated with rivaroxaban or standard of care as a control for 12 months or until death. Baseline characteristics were collected at the study entry. The primary outcomes were recurrent DVT or PE and death within 12 months after treatment initiation. Safety outcomes were composite outcomes of major and minor bleeding.    Results: A total of 80 patients confirm CAT with radiological imaging were recruited; 39 patients were evaluated in the control arm and 41 patients in the rivaroxaban arm. The 12 months cumulative CAT recurrence rate was 46.2% in control and 39% in rivaroxaban (p=0.519). The 12-month death was not a statistically significant difference between both arms (20.5% vs. 31.7%, p=0.255). The cumulative rate of composite safety outcomes was similar in both groups (17.9% vs. 12.2%, p=0.471).. The result of this small but important real-world evidence proofs that rivaroxaban is an effective and safe alternative to the standard of care for CAT in Malaysia's cancer population.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Female; Humans; Malaysia; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Tertiary Healthcare; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

To determine the effect and safety of sequential treatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin dalteparin and the direct oral anticoagulants rivaroxaban in patients with cancer- associated venous thromboembolism (VTE).. Observational study.. Department of Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, between January 2017 and September 2019.. Patients with active cancer, diagnosed with VTE and who received sequential treatment with dalteparin and rivaroxaban, were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with VTE recurrence.. Ninety-nine patients with active cancer were enrolled in the study. The median delteparin treatment time was nine days (5-20 days), and 2.8 months (1-6 months) for rivaroxaban. Sixty (60.6%) patients had eliminated VTE, and 39 (39.4%) had persistent VTE, but with relieved symptoms. No major bleeding was observed. Eleven (11.1%) patients had minor bleeding, including melena (5.1%), hematuria (3.0%), vaginal bleeding (1.0%), gingival bleeding (1.0%), and subcutaneous hemorrhage (1.0%). During the 6 months follow-up period, one (1.0%) developed pulmonary embolism, and seven (7.1%) experienced recurrent VTE. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that bleeding occurrence and anticoagulant treatment duration were the two significant factors affecting VTE recurrence (p<0.05).. Maintenance of rivaroxaban after initial dalteparin treatment could effectively reduce the risk of VTE recurrence and was well tolerated by patients with cancer-associated VTE. However, in the clinical practice, the treatment duration is often insufficient, so it is essential to follow-up these patients to ensure sufficient treatment time. Key Words: Venous thromboembolism, Low-molecular-weight heparins, Directly oral anticoagulants, Cancer.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Female; Humans; Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Neoplasms; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism is a common complication among cancer patients with an estimated risk of 20%. American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants for long-term anticoagulation but caution the use of direct oral anticoagulants because of drug-drug interactions with antineoplastic therapies. The clinical impact of these drug-drug interactions is yet to be studied in clinical trials. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the drug-drug interactions on venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding.. This is a retrospective cohort study that included cancer patients with venous thromboembolism receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban with antineoplastic therapy. The impact of the drug-drug interaction was determined by its effect on the rates of venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding in patients with a drug-drug interaction compared to patients with no drug-drug interaction.. The primary composite endpoint of venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding events occurred in 65% versus 62% of patients in drug-drug interaction and non-drug-drug interaction groups accordingly. There was a higher rate of venous thromboembolism recurrence and minor bleeding events with anti-mitotic microtubule inhibitors and a higher rate of minor bleeding events with hormonal therapy and alkylating agents. Among the drug-drug interaction group, there were no major bleeding events reported with mild drug-drug interactions when compared to moderate-to-severe drug-drug interactions. There was no difference in time to venous thromboembolism recurrence between rivaroxaban and apixaban.. Due to small sample size, our study results could not confirm a higher risk of bleeding or venous thromboembolism recurrence with the drug-drug interactions. Further prospective study is warranted, but clinicians should be aware of these drug-drug interactions and identify them using available literature.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Drug Interactions; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Although rivaroxaban has recently become widely used for thrombosis treatment, it is difficult for clinicians to make clinical decisions in critical situations, such as emergent surgery or interventions, because a specific anti-Xa assay is not available in many laboratories. This study assessed the relationships between rivaroxaban-specific anti-factor Xa activity (AXA) and unfractionated heparin (UFH)-specific AXA and determined the cutoff level for UFH-specific AXA in critical situations for patients undergoing rivaroxaban therapy.. Thirty-eight blood samples were collected from patients with cancer-associated thrombosis receiving rivaroxaban therapy. All samples were assessed using both rivaroxaban-specific and UFH-specific anti-Xa assays. Routine coagulation studies, including prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time, were also conducted on the samples.. A positive dose-dependent correlation between rivaroxaban-specific and UFH-specific AXA was evident (R = 0.97; P < .0001). Rivaroxaban-specific AXA was also positively correlated with PT (R = 0.95; P < .0001) but only weakly with activated partial thromboplastin time (R = 0.67; P < .0001). Patients with plasma rivaroxaban concentrations <100 ng/mL were found to have UFH-specific AXA <1.41 IU/mL and PT <17.3 seconds, with sensitivities of 100% and 93.3% and specificities of 87.0% and 95.7%, respectively.. Our study demonstrates that UFH-calibrated AXA correlates strongly with plasma rivaroxaban concentration. This assay appears to be sensitive to the presence of rivaroxaban, which may be advantageous in the setting of assessing drug levels for critical events. These findings suggest that if a rivaroxaban-specific anti-Xa assay is unavailable, the chromogenic anti-Xa assay for UFH may be useful to assess the anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Clinical Decision-Making; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Neoplasms; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban

The safety and efficacy of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been established in randomized controlled trials, but limited data are available on their use in clinical practice across geographical regions.. In the international RE-COVERY DVT/PE observational study (enrollment January 2016 to May 2017), we sought to characterize the patient population and describe the prescribed anticoagulant. Patient characteristics and anticoagulants administered after objective diagnosis of VTE were recorded at the baseline visit and again at hospital discharge or at 14 days after the diagnosis, whichever was later.. A total of 6095 patients were included, 50.2% were male, and the mean age was 61.5 years. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (35%), diabetes mellitus (11%), cancer (11%), prior VTE(11%), and trauma/surgery (7%). Overall, 77% of patients received oral anticoagulants, with 54% on NOACs and 23% on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs); 20% received parenteral anticoagulation only. NOACs comprised about 60% of anticoagulant treatment in Europe and Asia but substantially less in Latin America (29%) and the Middle East (21%). For NOAC therapies, the distribution (as a percentage of the total cohort) was rivaroxaban 25.6%, dabigatran 15.5%, apixaban 11.3%, and edoxaban 1.7%. Treatment with NOACs was less frequent in patients who had cancer, chronic renal disease, heart failure, or stroke.. These findings enhance our understanding of baseline characteristics and the initial management of patients with VTE in routine practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Anticoagulants; Asia; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Diabetes Mellitus; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Humans; Hypertension; Latin America; Male; Middle Aged; Middle East; Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Wounds and Injuries

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: 4-Hydroxycoumarins; Adult; Aftercare; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; England; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Incidence; Indenes; International Normalized Ratio; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; State Medicine; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Thrombophilia; Vena Cava Filters; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Topics: Anticoagulants; Betacoronavirus; Coronavirus; Coronavirus Infections; COVID-19; Humans; Neoplasms; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Rivaroxaban; SARS-CoV-2; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

The present article addresses clinical challenges associated with the choice of the anticoagulant agent, the definition of the duration of anticoagulant treatment and the assessment of the risk-to-benefit ratio of prolonged anticoagulation for patients with pulmonary embolism (PE).Anticoagulation is performed with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in hemodynamically unstable patients and with low molecular weight heparins (LWMH) or fondaparinux in normotensive patients. In patients with high or intermediate clinical probability of pulmonary embolism, anticoagulation should be initiated without delay while awaiting the results of diagnostic tests. LMWH and fondaparinux are preferred over UFH in the initial anticoagulation of PE since they are associated with a lower risk of bleeding.All patients with PE require therapeutic anticoagulation for at least three months. The current 2019 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommend that all eligible patients should be treated with a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) in preference to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA). In patients with active cancer, Apixaban, Edoxaban and Rivaroxaban are effective alternatives to treatment with LMWH.The decision on the duration of anticoagulation should consider both, the individual risk of PE recurrence and the individual risk of bleeding. The risk for recurrent PE after discontinuation of treatment is related to the features of the index PE event. While patients with a strong transient risk factor have a low risk of recurrence and anticoagulation can be discontinued after three months, patients with strong persistent risk factor (such as active cancer) have a high risk of recurrence and thus should receive anticoagulant treatment of indefinite duration. Given the favourable safety profile of NOACs (especially if a reduced dosage of Apixaban or Rivaroxaban is initiated after at least six months of therapeutic anticoagulation), extended oral anticoagulation of indefinite duration should be considered for all patients with intermediate risk of recurrence.

Topics: Acute Disease; Dalteparin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Guideline Adherence; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Long-Term Care; Neoplasms; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Approximately one-fifth of all cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are related to cancer. VTE complications may have a substantial impact on prognosis, quality of life and care in patients with cancer. Patients with cancer-related VTE are at increased risk of developing recurrent VTE compared to patients without cancer, but also have a higher risk of major bleeding. In the last years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been evaluated in a head-to-head comparison with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in two randomized trials for the long-term treatment of VTE in patients with advanced cancer. The results of these trials show that DOACs have a similar efficacy profile, but probably higher risk of bleeding, compared to LMWH dalteparin. Because DOACs offer a simple oral treatment regimen without the need for anticoagulation monitoring, they could be attractive alternatives to LMWHs in these setting. The American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, published in August 2019, recommend LMWH, edoxaban and rivaroxaban as first-choice therapies for long-term anticoagulation in cancer patients with VTE. However, several practical issues should be considered concerning the long-term use of DOAC treatment in patients with cancer. Major concerns have been highlighted about the gastrointestinal bleeding risk in patients with gastrointestinal cancers and the potential drug-drug interactions in combination for some specific anticancer therapies. Several studies comparing DOACs with LMWH are currently ongoing to refine our knowledge concerning treatment with DOACs in patients with cancer-associated VTE.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Guidelines provide differing recommendations regarding direct-acting oral anticoagulants vs low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). This study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs LMWH for treatment of CAT. Using US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare-linked data from 2013 through 2016, we evaluated adults with active breast, lung, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer, who were admitted to the hospital or treated in the emergency department for CAT and were prescribed rivaroxaban or LMWH for outpatient anticoagulation. Patients with luminal gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancers were excluded. Rivaroxaban and LMWH users were 1:1 propensity score matched. Outcomes included the composite of recurrent thrombosis or major bleeding, each outcome separately, and mortality at 6 months, using an intent-to-treat approach. On-treatment analysis after 12 months was also performed. Proportional hazards models for the subdistribution of competing risk were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included 529 rivaroxaban- and 529 LMWH-treated patients with CAT. Rivaroxaban was not associated with differences in risk of the composite outcome (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.41-1.22), major bleeding (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.50-2.01), or mortality (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07) vs LMWH, but it reduced recurrent thrombosis (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.95). On-treatment analysis at 12 months showed similar results. Rivaroxaban may be a reasonable alternative to LMWH for patients with CAT without gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Medicare; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; United States; Venous Thromboembolism

Inflammation with leukocyte activation is a hallmark of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), and elevated leukocytes predict venous thromboembolism in cancer outpatients. In a recent trial, rivaroxaban was more efficacious than dalteparin in preventing CAT recurrence.. In a proof-of-concept study, we aimed to provide a mechanistic basis for improved efficacy of rivaroxaban compared to low molecular weight heparin in CAT treatment.. We studied the effects of rivaroxaban, dalteparin, and tinzaparin at peak and trough levels on tumor cell-induced procoagulant activity and platelet aggregation in the presence or absence of the cationic leukocyte-derived enzyme, myeloperoxidase (MPO). Furthermore, pro-inflammatory conditions were generated by stimulating whole blood with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or phorbol-myristate-acetate (PMA), before measuring thrombin generation in plasma supernatants.. All three anticoagulants inhibited thrombin generation, fibrin clot formation, and platelet aggregation induced by the tissue factor-expressing prostate carcinoma cell line, 22Rv1. Pre-incubation with MPO partially attenuated the anticoagulant activity of dalteparin and tinzaparin, but not rivaroxaban, at trough levels. The effect of MPO did not involve the enzyme's catalytic properties, but required its structural integrity, as indicated by heat denaturation. In plasma obtained from LPS- or PMA-stimulated whole blood, elevated MPO antigen levels inversely correlated with the ability of tinzaparin to inhibit 22Rv1-induced thrombin generation.. Myeloperoxidase release may partially attenuate the anticoagulant activity of trough levels of dalteparin and tinzaparin in the context of paraneoplastic leukocyte activation. However, this effect is likely not sufficient to explain the improved efficacy of rivaroxaban, and possibly other oral factor Xa inhibitors, in CAT treatment.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; Peroxidase; Rivaroxaban

There is insufficient real-world data on the current status of Japanese patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) or its treatment and prevention with rivaroxaban.Methods and Results:In this multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted in Japan, 1,039 patients with acute symptomatic/asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) with or without DVT prescribed rivaroxaban were enrolled at 152 institutions and observed for a median of 21.3 months. Mean age was 68.0±14.7 years, mean body weight was 60.3±14.1 kg, 59.0% were females, and 19.0% had active cancer. Incidences of recurrence or aggravation of symptomatic VTE (primary effectiveness outcome) and major bleeding (principal safety outcome) were 2.6% and 2.9% per patient-year, respectively. These outcomes did not differ between patients with DVT and those with PE (primary effectiveness outcome: 2.6% vs. 2.5% per patient-year, P=0.810; principal safety outcome: 3.5% vs. 2.4% per patient-year, P=0.394). The incidence of composite clinically relevant events, including recurrence or aggravation of symptomatic VTE, acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, all-cause death, or major bleeding events, was 9.2% per patient-year. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex, being underweight, having active cancer, chronic heart and lung disease, and previous stroke were independent determinants for composite clinically relevant events.. In Japanese clinical practice, a single-drug approach with rivaroxaban was demonstrated to be a valuable treatment for a broad range of VTE patients.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is often applied in chemotherapy patients and commonly causes upper extremity venous thrombosis (UEVT), which should be prevented.To assess the preventive effects of the anticoagulants rivaroxaban and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on UEVT in patients receiving chemotherapy through PICCs.A total of 423 chemotherapy patients with continuous PICC use between January 2014 and June 2015 at the Oncology Department of Dongying People's Hospital were divided into 3 groups: rivaroxaban (10 mg/day, orally), LMWH (Enoxaparine, 4000 anti-Xa IU/day, subcutaneous injection), and control (no anticoagulant). UEVT incidence and other complications during PICC use were observed and recorded.The rivaroxaban, LMWH, and control groups included 138 (79 males; 54.9 ± 11.0 years), 144 (76 males; 56.0 ± 10.9 years), and 141 (71 males; 53.3 ± 10.9 years) patients, (P = .402 and P = .623 for age and sex respectively). There were no differences in cancer location (P = .628), PICC implantation site (P > .05), body mass index (BMI) (P = .434), blood pressure (all P > .05), blood lipids (5 laboratory parameters included, all P > .5), smoking (P = .138), history of lower limb venous thrombosis (P = .082), and 10 other associated comorbidities (all P > .5). Twenty-nine patients withdrew from the study (5 from the rivaroxaban, 12 from the LMWH, and 12 from the control groups, respectively), and 394 patients were analyzed. There were significant differences in the rivaroxaban group and the LMWH group compared to the control group (P = .010 and P = .009, respectively), but no significant difference was observed between the rivaroxaban group and the LMWH group (P = .743).Anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban and LMWH may reduce the incidence of PICC-related UEVT in patients receiving chemotherapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Catheterization, Central Venous; Catheterization, Peripheral; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

All cancers increase developing venous thromboembolism risk, and VTE is the second-leading cause of death among cancer patients. The anticoagulant drugs are considered to be the optimal treatment for patients with cancer-associated VTE. However, there is still controversy whether rivaroxaban, a new oral anticoagulant, can lead to better outcomes globally.. We will search PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for relevant published studies before 1 September, 2019, without any language restrictions. Only published randomized controlled trials that meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Subgroup analysis of the type of cancer, the type of VTE, cancer stage, age, sex, ethnicity, history of smoking and drinking as well as the mean, dose and duration of anticoagulants will be performed.. Our study aims to estimate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for patients with cancer-associated VTE and to provide recommendations to key stakeholders.. PROSPERO, October 23, 2019, CRD42019143265, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=143265.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Neoplasms; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Report bleeding incidences associated with rivaroxaban in adult patients with solid tumor malignancies requiring anticoagulation therapy.. This retrospective review was conducted at Indiana University Health, University Hospital and the Simon Cancer Center in Indianapolis, IN from January 2013 - February 2016. Patients were included if they had a solid tumor malignancy and prescribed rivaroxaban. Data were collected on 144 patients. Major bleeding was defined as bleeding requiring treatment (local, systemic treatment, blood cell transfusions) or hospitalization and minor bleeding was defined as bleeding not requiring treatment or hospitalization.. Sixty-four (44%) patients experienced bleeding while on rivaroxaban. There were six cancer types that had a higher incidence of bleeding: bladder, breast, melanoma, pancreas, prostate, and renal cell cancers; 40% (6/15) of patients with bladder cancer experienced bleeding; 54% (7/13) with breast cancer experienced bleeding; 40% (4/10) of patients with melanoma experienced bleeding; 58% (11/19) of patients with pancreatic cancer experienced bleeding; 45% (10/22) of patients with prostate cancer experienced bleeding; and 56% (5/9) of patients with renal cell carcinoma experienced bleeding. No other data collected identified increased incidence of bleeding.. Patients on rivaroxaban with a diagnosis of bladder, breast, melanoma, pancreas, prostate, or renal cell cancers had a higher incidence of bleeding compared to other solid tumors. Major bleeding was higher in bladder, breast, pancreas, and renal cell carcinomas, while minor bleeding was higher in patients with melanoma and prostate cancer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Electronic Health Records; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a multifactorial disease. Cancer and older age are risk factors for both recurrent VTE and bleeding under anticoagulant therapy. Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors (Xa inhibitors) have been widely used to treat VTE. However, their effectiveness and safety in cancer and elderly patients have not been fully elucidated. A total of 187 consecutive patients who started Xa inhibitors for VTE therapy between September 2014 and September 2016 were recruited. Patients' demographics, changes in VTE amount, VTE recurrence, clinically relevant bleeding, and death until February 2017 were compared between 92 cancer and 95 non-cancer patients, and 57 elderly (≥ 75 years) and 130 non-elderly patients. Compared with non-cancer patients, cancer patients had a significantly higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the proximal legs, superior vena cava, and upper extremities (p = 0.034), although the patients' demographics and incidence of pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) were similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences in VTE recurrence (p = 0.328) and clinically relevant bleeding (p = 0.078) between the two groups. Death occurred in 29 cancer patients, 23 of whom died of cancer, while there were no deaths among the non-cancer patients. Elderly patients had a lower body weight and creatinine clearance than non-elderly patients. No significant differences between the two groups were found in relation to PE (p = 0.544), DVT site (p = 0.054), recurrent VTE (p = 0.194), clinically relevant bleeding (p = 0.130) and death (p = 0.241). In comparisons among the four groups (elderly and non-elderly patients with and without cancer), recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding were comparable (p = 0.493 and 0.227, respectively), while death was more frequent in cancer patients regardless of age (p < 0.001). The efficacy and safety of Xa inhibitors as VTE treatment were comparable between cancer and non-cancer patients, and in elderly and non-elderly patients. This suggests that Xa inhibitors may be promising drugs for VTE treatment, irrespective of age and comorbid cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Lower Extremity; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Insurance; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Recurrence; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban could be an attractive alternative to low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) but the safety and effectiveness remain unclear. We examined risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding associated with rivaroxaban treatment of cancer-associated VTE.. Through linkage of nationwide Danish registries, we identified all adults with cancer-associated VTE initiating treatment with rivaroxaban, 2012-2017. We estimated rates and absolute risk of the primary outcome of recurrent VTE and major bleeding; all-cause mortality was studied as a secondary outcome.. We identified 8901 patients with cancer-associated VTE of whom 476 (5.3%) redeemed a prescription for rivaroxaban within 30 days of VTE diagnosis (mean age 71.5 years, 41% females, 57% with pulmonary embolism). Median time from cancer diagnosis to rivaroxaban prescription was 31 days (interquartile range 12-73 days). Most frequent cancers were gastrointestinal (26.1%), genitourinary (23.3%), and hematological cancer (12.6%). Few had distant metastases (7.1%). At 6 months, recurrent VTE occurred in 6.1% (15.1 events per 100 person-years) with the highest absolute risks for genitourinary cancer (8.1%), gastrointestinal cancer (7.3%), and breast cancer (6.5%). Major bleeding occurred in 1.9% (5.3 events per 100 person-years), in particular, in genitourinary cancer (4.5%) and lung cancer (4.2%). Eighty deaths (17.8%) occurred during follow up.. In this clinical practice setting, rivaroxaban was rarely used for cancer-associated VTE. However, among those who received rivaroxaban, the treatment appeared safe and effective with rates comparable to previous studies of selected populations.

Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are safe and efficacious when compared to warfarin for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, bleeding is a major side effect of anticoagulant therapy in VTE patients. Discontinuation of the DOACs associated to adverse events such as bleeding. The HAS-BLED score predicts warfarin-associated hemorrhage. However, little is known about risk factors for DOAC-associated minor bleeding in VTE patients. We aimed to identify risk factors for minor bleeding in VTE patients that were treated with edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. We retrospectively evaluated the data of 212 VTE patients who received treatment with a DOAC. The study endpoint was defined as the occurrence of minor bleeding. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors that were significantly associated with minor bleeding. A total of 36 (17.0%) patients experienced minor bleeding, with rates of 15.7%, 0%, and 21.3% for edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, bleeding history or predisposition [odds ratio (OR) 6.083, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.131-17.364, p=0.001] and cancer (OR 6.397, 95% CI 2.858-14.317, p<0.001) were significantly associated with minor bleeding. Bleeding history or predisposition and cancer were the most important risk factors for DOAC-induced minor bleeding in VTE patients in this study. To continue anticoagulant therapy of the DOACs, further management systems by minor bleeding risk factors for patients with VTE will be required.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Aged; Databases, Factual; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Female; Health Expenditures; Health Resources; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Hospitalization; Humans; Insurance Claim Review; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are the drug of choice for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), however non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) seem to be a reasonable alternative. We investigated the safety and efficacy of NOAC versus LMWH in patients with a history of CAT.. In a prospective cohort study 128 consecutive patients with active cancer who experienced CAT were enrolled following LMWH treatment for ≥3 months. Symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding and death were recorded during follow-up.. 65 (50.8%) patients were switched to NOAC and 63 (49.2%) continued with LMWH. During a median follow-up of 17 (interquartile range, 15-21) months, recurrent VTE was observed in 6 (9.2%) patients on NOAC and in 12 (19.0%) on LMWH (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-1.16). The rate of major bleeding was 9.2% and 4.8%, respectively (HR 2.00, 95% CI 0.50-8.00). The median time to bleeding was shorter in patients on NOAC (3 [2.25-5.5] months) versus on LMWH (9 [6.5-13.0] months). The mortality rates were similar in both groups (15.4% versus 15.9%, respectively, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.32-1.84).. In patients following CAT, extended treatment with NOAC, compared with LMWH, appears to be associated with similar effectiveness and safety.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Topics: Anticoagulants; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE).We performed a retrospective chart review of cancer patients with a pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, or both. Our analysis included all patients who received rivaroxaban from March 2013 to June 2016 at the Hemato-Oncology Division at the Pusan National University Hospital in Korea.Preliminary results identified 123 patients with a history of cancer that were treated with rivaroxaban. The average duration of rivaroxaban therapy was 95.25 days. While 35 patients had resolved VTE after the initiation of rivaroxaban, only one patient had it recur on rivaroxaban treatment. Major bleeding was observed in 6 (4.9%) patients and minor bleeding in 12 (9.8%) patients. The majority of bleeding events occurred spontaneously and most incidences of bleeding could be treated conservatively. Recurrence and major bleeding events on rivaroxaban were relatively low despite the fact that many patients had metastatic disease. Among 52 patient deaths (42.3%), none were due to VTE or bleeding complications; the cause of death in the majority of cases was cancer progression.Rivaroxaban is effective and safe for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pulmonary Embolism; Republic of Korea; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Young Adult

Patients with cancer are at increased risk of thrombosis, particularly those with central venous catheter (CVC) placement, which may predispose to the development of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT). Standard treatment includes low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or LMWH bridged to warfarin. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become standard of care for uncomplicated venous thromboembolism (VTE), but research in patients with cancer is ongoing.. To assess rivaroxaban monotherapy in patients with cancer who develop UEDVT due to CVC for preservation of line function, and safety outcomes of VTE recurrence, bleeding risk and death.. Patients ≥18years of age with active malignancy and symptomatic proximal UEDVT with or without pulmonary embolism (PE), associated with a CVC, were eligible. Treatment included rivaroxaban 15mg oral twice daily for 3weeks, followed by 20mg oral daily for 9weeks. Patients were followed clinically for 12weeks to assess for line function, recurrent VTE and bleeding.. Seventy patients (47 women) were included, with mean age 54.1years. The most common malignancy was breast cancer (41%). Preservation of line function was 100% at 12weeks. The risk of recurrent VTE at 12weeks was 1.43%, with one episode of fatal PE. 9 patients (12.9%) experienced 11 total bleeding episodes.. Rivaroxaban showed promise in treating CVC-UEDVT in cancer patients, resulting in preserved line function. However, bleeding rates and a fatal pulmonary embolism on treatment are concerning safety outcomes necessitating further study before rivaroxaban can be recommended.

Topics: Central Venous Catheters; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

Background There is increasing evidence indicating oral factor Xa inhibitors can be used for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Studies are needed to compare oral factor Xa inhibitors, low molecular weight heparins, and warfarin in the oncology population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the recurrent venous thromboembolism incidence in oncology patients utilizing oral Xa inhibitors, low molecular weight heparins, or warfarin. Methods Using retrospectively collected data, we compared the recurrent venous thromboembolism incidence in oncology patients taking rivaroxaban/apixaban, enoxaparin, or warfarin with at least three months of follow-up. Patients were included if they had an active cancer, venous thromboembolism, and taking warfarin, enoxaparin, or rivaroxaban/apixaban. The primary endpoint was the first episode of recurrent venous thromboembolism at three months. Secondary endpoints included recurrent venous thromboembolism after six months, major bleeding, and mortality. Results Of 127 venous thromboembolism patients, 48 received rivaroxaban or apixaban, 23 received enoxaparin, and 56 received warfarin. The three most common cancer diagnoses were lung (21%), colorectal (14%), and breast (14%). There was no difference in venous thromboembolism recurrence at three months between the rivaroxaban/apixaban (0%), warfarin (3.6%), and the enoxaparin cohorts (4.4%) (p = 0.8319). Major bleeding at three months was only seen in one patient in the enoxaparin arm (4.2%). Mortality at three months was 0%, 3.6%, and 17.4% in the rivaroxaban/apixaban, warfarin, and enoxaparin cohorts, respectively. Conclusion The results of this retrospective study suggest that oral factor Xa inhibitors are potential options for cancer patients with venous thromboembolism. However, randomized, controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

To evaluate the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) treated at Ochsner Medical Center with the intent of determining the efficacy and safety of these agents.. Patients were identified by a retrospective data extraction of patients treated at Ochsner Medical Center from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2015. Patients were included for review if they were ≥18 years of age, with a confirmed diagnosis of VTE and active or history of cancer, and if they received dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, or edoxaban for at least 6 months. The primary objectives were the rate of recurrence of VTE and the incidence of bleeding at 6 months.. Thirty-seven patients were identified. Twelve patients were diagnosed with PE, 21 with DVT, 3 with DVT and PE, and 1 with DVT and superficial vein thrombosis (SVT). Apixaban was used most often (n = 27). No patients experienced a recurrent DVT or PE at 6 months. Two patients experienced adverse effects during treatment.. In this single-center, retrospective, observational study in patients with cancer receiving DOAC therapy, there were no episodes of recurrent VTE and only 2 episodes of clinically significant bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Cancer is a known hypercoagulable state that leads to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Low molecular weight heparin remains the preferred anticoagulant for VTE in patients with cancer over vitamin K antagonist. However, the preferred anticoagulant in prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cancer has yet to be determined. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly being utilized; however their role in cancer has only recently been investigated. The objective of this retrospective cohort was to describe real-world anticoagulation prescribing patterns in cancer patients at a large academic medical center between January 1, 2013 and October 31, 2016. We sought to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of DOACs in patients with cancer for either VTE and/or AF. Patient demographic, clinical characteristics, as well as bleeding and thrombotic events were collected. There were 214 patients in our analysis, of which 71 patients (33%) received a DOAC [apixaban (n = 22), dabigatran (n = 17), and rivaroxaban (n = 32)]. There were fewer bleeding events and/or discontinuations in the DOAC group compared to enoxaparin (13 vs. 27, p = 0.022). There was no difference in major or minor bleeds or thromboembolic events in comparing DOAC to enoxaparin or DOAC to warfarin. This was a retrospective, single-institution study assessing the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to warfarin or enoxaparin in patients with cancer. DOACs may represent an alternative to warfarin or enoxaparin in patients with cancer for VTE and/or stroke reduction in AF.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Purpose Although low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) remains the standard of care, factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban may serve as an alternative treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active malignancy. The purpose of the analysis was to evaluate outcomes of VTE management in cancer patients treated with rivaroxaban compared to enoxaparin. Methods This single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with malignancy-associated VTE initiated on treatment with either rivaroxaban or enoxaparin. The primary endpoint was the incidence of recurrent VTE. Secondary outcomes included a comparison in rates of bleeding, mean duration of treatment, and mean time to recurrence of VTE. Results A total of 45 patients were included in each group. The incidence of recurrent VTE was 8.9% in the rivaroxaban group versus 13.3% in the enoxaparin group ( p = 0.53). There were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcomes with the exception of longer mean duration of treatment in the rivaroxaban group compared to the enoxaparin group (169 vs. 110 days, respectively; p = 0.04). Conclusions This study provides important preliminary information regarding the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for treatment of VTE in cancer patients. Although LMWH should remain the standard of care, these results provide initial reassurance that rivaroxaban serves as a viable alternative in the event that injectable anticoagulation is not an acceptable approach to VTE management.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Randomized clinical trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin in cancer patients have not been performed. We evaluated the effectiveness and associated risk of DOACs vs warfarin, as well as comparisons of DOACs, in a large population of cancer patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Using the MarketScan databases, we identified 16 096 AF patients (mean age, 74 years) initiating oral anticoagulant and being actively treated for cancer between 2010 and 2014. Anticoagulant users were matched by age, sex, enrollment date, and drug initiation date. Study end points were identified with diagnostic codes and included ischemic stroke, severe bleeding, other bleeding, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Cox regression was used to estimate associations of anticoagulants with study end points. Compared with warfarin, rates of bleeding (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) were similar in rivaroxaban (1.09 [0.79, 1.39]) and dabigatran (0.96 [0.72, 1.27]) users, whereas apixaban users experienced lower rates (0.37 [0.17, 0.79]). Rates of ischemic stroke did not differ among anticoagulant users. Compared with warfarin, rate of VTE (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) was lower among rivaroxaban (0.51 [0.41, 0.63]), dabigatran (0.28 [0.21, 0.38]), and apixaban (0.14 [0.07, 0.32]) users. In head-to-head comparisons among DOACs, dabigatran users had lower rates of VTE than rivaroxaban users; apixaban users had lower rates of VTE and severe bleeding than rivaroxaban users. In this population of patients with AF and cancer, DOAC users experienced lower or similar rates of bleeding and stroke compared with warfarin users, and a lower rate of incident VTE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin; Young Adult

Anticoagulation is used to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients, but may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding. VTE recurrence and major bleeding were assessed in cancer patients treated for VTE with the most currently prescribed anticoagulants in clinical practice. Newly diagnosed cancer patients (first VTE 1/1/2013-05/31/2015) who initiated rivaroxaban, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), or warfarin were identified from Humana claims data and observed until end of eligibility or end of data availability. VTE recurrence was a hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of VTE ≥7 days after first VTE. Major bleeding events on treatment were identified using validated criteria. Cohorts were compared using Kaplan-Meier rates at 6 and 12 months and Cox proportional hazards models. Cohorts were adjusted for their differences at baseline. A total of 2428 patients (rivaroxaban: 707; LMWH: 660; warfarin: 1061) met inclusion criteria. Patient characteristics were well balanced after weighting. There was a trend for lower VTE recurrence rates in rivaroxaban users compared to LMWH users at 6 months (13.2% vs. 17.1%; P = .060) and significantly lower at 12 months (16.5% vs. 22.2%; P = .030) [HR: 0.72, 95% CI: (0.52-0.95); P = .024]. VTE recurrence rates were also lower for rivaroxaban than warfarin users at 6 months (13.2% vs. 17.5%; P = .014) and 12 months (15.7% vs. 19.9%; P = .017) [HR: 0.74, 95% CI: (0.56-0.96); P = .028]. Major bleeding rates were similar across cohorts. This real-world analysis suggests cancer patients with VTE treated with rivaroxaban had significantly lower risk of recurrent VTE and similar risk of bleeding compared to those treated with LMWH or warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Dalteparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neoplasms; Observational Studies as Topic; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become an attractive option for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. However, their use is currently not recommended as first-line treatment by national guidelines due to limited data in this patient population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the practice and safety patterns of DOACs when used for VTE treatment in the oncology population. This study was a retrospective chart review of adult cancer patients treated at Hackensack University Medical Center from January 2013 to October 2015 who received dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban for VTE treatment. Of 126 patients screened, 39 patients were included. Thirty-five patients received rivaroxaban and four patients received apixaban. Ten of 39 patients (26%) were not receiving a DOAC dosage consistent with the package insert. No patients experienced clinically significant bleeding, while four patients experienced a minor bleed. Four of 14 thrombocytopenic patients (29%) did not have their DOAC dose held for thrombocytopenia. All patients had their DOACs appropriately held for procedures. Increased education on dosing DOACs according to the package insert is warranted for oncology prescribers. Despite the increased risk for bleeding in cancer patients, no clinically significant bleeding events were identified in our patient cohort. This data suggests that the use of DOACs may be safe to use for VTE treatment in cancer patients and may provide foundation for larger, randomized controlled trials to determine whether DOACs should be used for VTE treatment in cancer patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Most clinical practice guidelines recommend low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. In the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, 1050 patients with cancer and acute VTE were randomized to oral edoxaban or subcutaneous dalteparin for at least 6 months and up to 12 months. Edoxaban was non-inferior to dalteparin with respect to the composite outcome of recurrent VTE and major bleeding. The rate of recurrent VTE was numerically lower, but the rate of major bleeding was significantly higher with edoxaban. The frequency of severe major bleeding was similar with edoxaban and dalteparin. The difference in major bleeding was mainly driven by a higher rate of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with edoxaban, especially in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The pilot Select-D study randomized 406 patients with cancer and VTE to rivaroxaban or dalteparin for 6 months. Recurrent VTE was reduced, while both major and clinically relevant non major bleeding were significantly increased with rivaroxaban. Bleeding mostly involved the gastrointestinal tract and occurred in patients with gastroesophageal cancer. While waiting for ongoing studies on direct oral anticoagulants, the results of the Hokusai VTE Cancer suggest that edoxaban may represent a valuable alternative to low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. In patients with gastrointestinal cancer, the use of edoxaban requires careful benefit-risk weighting, taking into consideration patient's preferences.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Perioperative Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Incidence, investigation and long-term follow-up of macroscopic hematuria in patients treated with non vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant: Insight from a specialist cardiology clinic In a retrospective long-term follow up of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with non-vitamin K dependent oral anticoagulants in a specialist clinic, the incidence of reported macroscopic hematuria was relatively low and none of these was major bleeding. Urgent investigation of the bleeding source by a urologist showed different etiologies, like newly discovered neoplasm, benign hyperplasia of the prostate gland, renal stones, or inflammatory changes in the urinary bladder, and some had normal findings. The majority of patients continued oral anticoagulation therapy after investigation. Incidence of re-bleeding was very low.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Substitution; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hematuria; Humans; Kidney Calculi; Male; Neoplasms; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was shown to be effective and safe in treating venous thromboembolism, and generally used for stroke in cancer patients, but its effects on stroke are unclear. We compared clinical outcomes between LMWH and new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) in patients with cancer-related stroke.. We enrolled patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke with active cancer who were treated with LMWH or NOAC between May 2012 and June 2015. The clinical outcomes, including early neurologic deterioration, early radiologic recurrence, 3-month modified Rankin scale score, 90-day mortality, cardio-cerebrovascular recurrence, and bleeding complications, were compared.. Among 48 patients, 7 patients were treated with NOAC, and the remaining 41 patients with LMWH. Overall, the participants presented poor outcomes, including 20 (42%) early neurologic deteriorations, 28 (58%) early radiologic recurrences, 34 (71%) poor modified Rankin scale scores, 27 (56%) 90-day mortality events, 24 (50%) cardio-cerebrovascular recurrences, and 18 (38%) bleeding complications, that led to a change or temporary hold in medication in 12 cases. No statistical differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of demographic, clinical, or cardiovascular risk factors and clinical outcomes.. NOAC showed the similar clinical outcomes and safety compared with LMWH in the treatment of cryptogenic ischemic stroke in active cancer patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Dalteparin; Disability Evaluation; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Recurrence; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Seoul; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Pharmacologic agents for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism in the cancer patient population are limited. Currently, low-molecular-weight heparin is recommended by national consensus guidelines for this indication. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, is Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism and offers the convenience of oral fixed-dose regimens, no routine laboratory monitoring, and has few drug and dietary interactions; however, its use in patients with cancer has not been largely studied. We report 2 cases of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer on rivaroxaban therapy. The first case is a 64-year-old female admitted for recurrent pulmonary embolism, and the second case is a 70-year-old female admitted for recurrent deep vein thrombosis. Both patients were receiving rivaroxaban at the time of thromboembolic recurrence. These cases serve as a reminder to health-care providers that more safety and efficacy data in the cancer patient population are needed prior to using rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism treatment.

Topics: Aged; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been the standard of care for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. Rivaroxaban was approved in 2012 for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but no prior studies have been reported specifically evaluating the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Under a Quality Assessment Initiative (QAI), we established a Clinical Pathway to guide rivaroxaban use for CAT and now report a validation analysis of our first 200 patients. A 200 patient cohort with CAT (PE or symptomatic, proximal DVT), whose full course of anticoagulation was with rivaroxaban, were accrued. In competing risk analysis, primary endpoints at 6 months included new or recurrent PE or symptomatic proximal lower extremity DVT, major bleeding, clinically-relevant non-major bleeding leading to discontinuation of rivaroxaban, or death. In competing risk analysis, the 6 months cumulative incidence of new or recurrent VTE was 4.4 % (95 % CI = 1.4-7.4 %), major bleeding was 2.2 % (95 % CI = 0-4.2 %) and all-cause mortality 17.6 % (95 % CI = 11.7-23.0 %). In this cohort of 200 patients with active cancer and CAT the rates of new or recurrent VTE and major bleeding were comparable to the cancer subgroup analysis from the EINSTEIN studies. The results of our Clinical Pathway provide guidance on Rivaroxaban use for treatment of CAT, and suggest that safety and efficacy is preserved, compared with past-published experience with LMWH.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

To study the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban-a direct oral anticoagulant-use in patients with active cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE).. Retrospective cohort study of 400 patients with active cancer and associated VTE, defined as deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. This single-center study was carried out from January 2012 to June 2015. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety, using the incidence of recurrent symptomatic VTE and major bleeding, respectively, throughout the treatment with rivaroxaban.. Of the 400 patients enrolled, 223 (55.8%) were female. A total of 362 (90.5%) patients had solid tumors and 244 (61%) had metastatic disease. A total of 302 (75.5%) received initial parenteral therapy with enoxaparin (median: 3, mean: 5.6, standard deviation [SD]: 6.4 days) followed by rivaroxaban. Ninety-eight patients (24.5%) were treated with on label rivaroxaban treatment. Recurrence rates were 3.25% with major bleeding occurring in 5.5% during the anticoagulant therapy (median: 118, mean: 163.9, SD: 159.9 days).. Rivaroxaban can be an attractive alternative for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Young Adult

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Early Detection of Cancer; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Referral and Consultation; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thrombosis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with venous thromboembolism and active malignancy, given the paucity of clinical data with the use of direct Xa inhibitors in this high-risk population.. Consecutive patients treated with rivaroxaban for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, enrolled into Mayo Thrombophilia Clinic Direct Oral Anticoagulants Registry between March 1, 2013, and April 30, 2015, were followed prospectively to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this therapy.. Of the 404 venous thromboembolism patients in the registry, 296 received rivaroxaban and had at least 3 months of follow-up. Of these, 118 (40%) had active malignancy (51% female, mean age 66 ± 10 years) and 178 had no cancer (47% female, mean age 55 ± 15 years). The 3 most common cancer locations were genitourinary (23.6%), gastrointestinal (20.3%), and lung (13.5%). There was no difference in venous thromboembolism recurrence between the malignant (3.3%) and the nonmalignant (2.8%) venous thromboembolism groups (P = .533). Borderline higher rates for major bleeding (P = .06) and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (P = .08) were observed in patients with cancer.. The "real world" effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban is similar for venous thromboembolism patients with and without active malignancy.

Topics: Aged; Case-Control Studies; Comorbidity; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Patient Safety; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Registries; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

A two-fold prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) is established as therapeutic range for therapy with unfractionated heparin, hirudin and argatroban. The international normalized ratio (INR) of 2 to 3 is required to maintain anticoagulation in the therapeutic range of vitamin K antagonists. The therapeutic range of anti-factor Xa activity during therapy with low-molecular weight heparins and danaparoid are less well and of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) poorly defined. The relation of aPTT and INR values to thrombotic and bleeding events are well established despite a large variation of values in affected patients. The relation of coagulation values of the other anticoagulants to clinical events is open. The value of determination in cancer patients is higher because of the increased risk for thrombotic and bleeding events of this patient group. Several activities are currently undertaken to certify methods for in vitro diagnostic testing for DAOCs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Neoplasms; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Arginine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pipecolic Acids; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Sulfonamides; Venous Thrombosis

Patients with cancer account for 20 % of cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Cancer patients are at increased risk for VTE during the entire course of their disease, also in absence of traditional VTE risk factors. Furthermore, patients with VTE and cancer have an estimated risk of bleeding of 15-20 % per year while on anticoagulant treatment. For these reasons, treatment of acute VTE in patients with cancer remains a clinical challenge. In clinical studies, which included about 27,000 patients, new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown to be as effective and safe as conventional anticoagulation (heparin given with and followed by vitamin K antagonists) for the treatment of VTE. In these studies, 1227 patients with active cancer were enrolled. Preliminary results of subgroup analyses and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials suggest that NOACs could represent an alternative to conventional anticoagulation in patients with active cancer. Further "ad hoc" studies evaluating the clinical benefit of treatment with NOACs in patients with VTE and cancer are needed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Acute Disease; Age Factors; Ambulatory Care; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Disease Management; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thrombolytic Therapy; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Vena Cava Filters; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Female; Fibrinolysis; Gangrene; Humans; Lower Extremity; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Veins; Venous Thrombosis

Approximately 6 million Americans are treated with chronic anticoagulation. Of these, 10% of patients will require temporary anticoagulation interruption for an invasive procedure each year. Anticoagulation management during this period requires a formal strategy in order to limit both bleeding and thromboembolic complications. This article will give health care providers a stepwise approach to this process. The first step is to determine whether warfarin discontinuation is necessary for the planned procedure. For procedures requiring warfarin discontinuation, the second step is to determine the appropriate timing. The third step is to identify the patient-specific thromboembolic risk in order to determine which patients require bridging therapy with parenteral anticoagulants. The fourth step is both the most complicated and most critical step in this management strategy. This decision-making step involves choosing the appropriate anticoagulant regimen, dose, and timing of reinitiation that is best tailored to a specific patient, as well as determining procedural variables, in order to limit bleeding and thrombotic complications.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Coronary Restenosis; Dabigatran; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Perioperative Care; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin