rivaroxaban and Lung-Neoplasms

rivaroxaban has been researched along with Lung-Neoplasms* in 5 studies

Reviews

2 review(s) available for rivaroxaban and Lung-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Practical recommendations to combine small-molecule inhibitors and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.
    European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2022, Jun-30, Volume: 31, Issue:164

    The risk for thromboembolisms in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is increased and often requires treatment or prophylaxis with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Small-molecule inhibitors (SMIs) to treat NSCLC may cause relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with DOACs. Guidance on how to combine these drugs is lacking, leaving patients at risk of clotting or bleeding. Here, we give practical recommendations to manage these DDIs.. For all DOACs and SMIs approved in Europe and the USA up to December 2021, a literature review was executed and reviews by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency were analysed for information on DDIs. A DDI potency classification for DOACs was composed and brought together with DDI characteristics of each SMI, resulting in recommendations for each combination.. Half of the combinations result in relevant DDIs, requiring an intervention to prevent ineffective or toxic treatment with DOACs. These actions include dose adjustments, separation of administration or switching between anticoagulant therapies. Combinations of SMIs with edoxaban never cause relevant DDIs, compared to more than half of combinations with other DOACs and even increasing to almost all combinations with rivaroxaban.. Combinations of SMIs and DOACs often result in relevant DDIs that can be prevented by adjusting the DOAC dosage, separation of administration or switching between anticoagulants.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban

2022
A Woman in Her 70s on Anticoagulation With Sudden Shock.
    Chest, 2019, Volume: 155, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Embolization, Therapeutic; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hematoma; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; May-Thurner Syndrome; Retroperitoneal Space; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Shock, Hemorrhagic; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Doppler

2019

Trials

1 trial(s) available for rivaroxaban and Lung-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Rivaroxaban versus nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis following thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A randomized, noninferiority trial.
    American journal of hematology, 2023, Volume: 98, Issue:8

    The benefit of rivaroxaban in thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery remains unknown. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, patients who underwent thoracic surgery for lung cancer were enrolled, and randomly assigned to rivaroxaban or nadroparin groups in a 1:1 ratio; anticoagulants were initiated 12-24 h after surgery and continued until discharge. Four hundred participants were required according to a noninferiority margin of 2%, assuming venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence rates of 6.0% and 12.6% for patients in the rivaroxaban and nadroparin groups, respectively. The primary efficacy outcome was any VTE during the treatment and 30-day follow-up periods. The safety outcome was any on-treatment bleeding event. Finally, 403 patients were randomized (intention-to-treat [ITT] population), with 381 included in per-protocol (PP) population. The primary efficacy outcomes occurred in 12.5% (25/200) of the rivaroxaban group and 17.7% (36/203) of the nadroparin group (absolute risk reduction, -5.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], [-12.2-1.7]), indicating the noninferiority of rivaroxaban in ITT population. Sensitivity analysis was performed in the PP population and yielded similar results, confirming the noninferiority of rivaroxaban. In the safety analysis population, the incidence of any on-treatment bleeding events did not differ significantly between the groups (12.2% for rivaroxaban vs. 7.0% for nadroparin; relative risk [RR], 1.9; 95% CI, [0.9-3.7]; p = .08), including major bleeding (9.7% vs. 6.5%; RR, 1.6 [95% CI, 0.9-3.7]; p = .24), and nonmajor bleeding (2.6% vs. 0.5%; RR, 5.2 [95% CI, 0.6-45.2]; p = .13). Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery was shown to be noninferior to nadroparin.

    Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Nadroparin; Rivaroxaban; Thoracic Surgery; Venous Thromboembolism

2023

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for rivaroxaban and Lung-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Advanced lung cancer patient with isolated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A case report.
    Medicine, 2022, Jul-15, Volume: 101, Issue:28

    Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a potentially devastating form of drug-induced thrombocytopenia, occurs in patients receiving heparin for thrombosis prevention or treatment. An isolated HIT is characterized by decreased platelet counts without thrombosis, which are atypical and difficult to clinically find.. A 33-year-old female patient's admission examination revealed elevated D-dimer levels. After prophylactic anticoagulation using low-molecular weight heparin, her blood platelet counts were rapidly decreased, whereas her D-dimer levels increased, followed by presentations of chest tightness, abdominal pain, and skin itching without thrombosis. After excluding all the other causes of thrombocytopenia, HIT was suspected. Her 4Ts score was 5 points, and enzyme-linked immunoassay for platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies was positive, indicating isolated HIT.. The patient was diagnosed with advanced lung cancer presenting with isolated HIT. We immediately stopped low-molecular weight heparin and initiated rivaroxaban for anticoagulation. We administered thrombopoietin (TPO) and avatripopal maleate tablets to increase blood platelet counts, whereas intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was administered to stimulate her immune system. The patient's thrombocytopenia was successfully treated without thrombosis and bleeding complications.. Rivaroxaban is a potential option for tumor preventive anticoagulation and HIT treatment. Early HIT identification is necessary. After identification, the 4Ts score as well as PF4/heparin antibodies should be assessed and appropriate anticoagulants selected based on patients' conditions.

    Topics: Adult; Antibodies; Anticoagulants; Female; Heparin; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Platelet Factor 4; Rivaroxaban; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombosis

2022
Aortic Aneurysm-associated Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation that Responded Well to a Switch from Warfarin to Rivaroxaban.
    Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2017, Nov-01, Volume: 56, Issue:21

    We describe a case in which uncontrolled chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) caused by an aortic aneurysm that was exacerbated by chemotherapy for lung cancer, showed dramatic improvement when warfarin, which was being administered for atrial fibrillation, was replaced by rivaroxaban, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). The present case is interesting because a DOAC was effective in treating DIC due to an aortic aneurysm, whereas warfarin, another oral anticoagulant, was ineffective. In controlling DIC, it is important to inhibit activated coagulation factors such as thrombin and activated factor X, rather than the coagulation factors, which act as substrates.

    Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antineoplastic Agents; Aortic Aneurysm; Atrial Fibrillation; Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

2017