rivaroxaban and Liver-Diseases

To review current literature for target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) and provide critical analysis for dosing recommendations in special population groups.. A literature search was conducted in Medline (1996 to April week 2 2015) and Embase (1980 to 2015 week 16) using key terms dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, kidney diseases, liver diseases, elderly, obesity, and special populations.. Randomized controlled trials in English assessing efficacy and safety of TSOACs in healthy adults and special populations were selected for analysis.. Phase 3 trials for TSOACs predominately excluded patients with severe renal impairment or active liver disease. There were no exclusion criteria based on age, body weight or body mass index. Additional conclusions were made in special populations, including those with renal or liver impairment and obese and elderly patients, based on secondary analyses, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic studies.. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes associated special populations may alter clinical decision with regard to drug selection and dosing. It is valuable to understand the rationale for labeled dosing recommendations in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention, particularly in patients that fall into special population groups. Furthermore, the use of TSOACs is likely to increase as clinicians gain experience with these agents and additional TSOACs and indications are approved.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Liver Diseases; Obesity; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Although highly effective, warfarin use is complicated by its unpredictable narrow therapeutic window, genetic heterogeneity in pharmacokinetic response, numerous food and drug interactions, and the need for regular international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Currently, several novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) drugs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) are available on the market as alternatives to warfarin. These agents all feature more predictable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties than warfarin. Additionally, the NOACs do not require routine monitoring of coagulation parameters, and have a relatively lower potential for interactions with drug, herb, and dietary constituents, which enhances the convenience of management for both patients and health professionals alike. However, there are other considerations regarding the use of NOACs that must be taken into account during management of therapy. In contrast to warfarin, most NOACs need dosage adjustments in renal impairment and are contraindicated in severe liver impairment, and there are no specific antidotes for treating NOAC-related over-anticoagulation. The more frequent dosing needed for NOACs may reduce adherence, especially in elderly patients with polypharmacy. Furthermore, NOACs, especially dabigatran, are not as well tolerated as warfarin in patients with gastrointestinal diseases. Overall, the availability of the NOACs has expanded the treatment armamentarium, but they are not without risk. Given the limited experience with the NOACs, their limited range of indications, and their cost, the characteristics of each anticoagulant must be carefully considered to carefully select the agent that will provide the optimal risk/benefit profile in the individual patient.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aging; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Complementary Therapies; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Kidney Diseases; Liver Diseases; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

The new oral anticoagulants (NOAs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have proved effective and safe when used in clinical trials, without a need to adjust the dose in response to laboratory testing. This demonstrated efficacy does not necessarily mean that the laboratory, considered the mainstay for the management of the old anticoagulants, will no longer play a role in treatment with NOAs.. Laboratories are involved in the management of anticoagulants in 2 ways. The first, monitoring, implies laboratory testing to assess the drug's effect and to adjust the dosage to maintain anticoagulation within the therapeutic interval. This consideration applies to the old drugs. The second way, measurement, implies laboratory evaluations of drug effect to determine whether patients are under- or over-anticoagulated, information that can be useful for decision-making in special circumstances. The latter applies to NOAs.. Measurements of the effect of NOAs are indicated in several situations: (a) patients with adverse events (i.e., thrombotic/hemorrhagic), particularly those who present with overdosage owing to excessive drug intake or decreased clearance; (b) patients undergoing surgical procedures for ensuring that no residual drug remains in the circulation; (c) patients requiring anticoagulation reversal because of life-threatening hemorrhage; (d) patients with renal insufficiency, who are likely to accumulate the drug in the circulation; (e) patients with liver failure, because NOAs are metabolized by the liver; (f) patients taking other drugs that might increase/decrease the effects of NOAs via drug-drug interactions. The choice of tests is based on such characteristics as availability, linearity of the dose-response curve, standardization, and responsiveness to increasing drug dosage. Practitioners need to be aware that NOAs can interfere with the measurement of common hemostasis parameters.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Hemostasis; Humans; Liver Diseases; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

The direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate (dabigatran) have gained approval for use in several indications, most notably for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Hepatic impairment can affect the disposition of these anticoagulants considerably not only because of the hepatic metabolism of the direct FXa inhibitors but also because moderate to severely impaired hepatic function will affect coagulation. This review describes the key pharmacological properties of novel oral anticoagulants with special attention to patients with impaired hepatic function. In subjects with moderately impaired liver function (i.e. Child-Pugh classification B), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of rivaroxaban (10 mg single dose) is increased by 2.27-fold, which is paralleled by an increase in FXa inhibition. The AUC of apixaban (5 mg single dose) is increased by 1.09-fold, whereas the AUC of edoxaban (15 mg single dose) is decreased by 4.8 % and the AUC of dabigatran (150 mg single dose) is decreased by 5.6 %. Specific labelling restrictions for rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran regarding impaired hepatic function are based on both the Child-Pugh classification and liver-related exclusion criteria applied in pivotal clinical trials. Rivaroxaban is contraindicated in patients with hepatic disease associated with coagulopathy and clinically relevant bleeding risk, including cirrhotic patients classified as Child-Pugh B and C. Apixaban can be used with caution in patients with mild (Child-Pugh A) or moderate (Child-Pugh B) hepatic impairment or in patients with alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels >2× upper limit of normal (ULN). Apixaban is not recommended in patients with severe hepatic impairment and is contraindicated in those with hepatic disease associated with coagulopathy and clinically relevant bleeding risk. Dabigatran is not recommended in patients with elevated liver enzymes (>2× ULN). Dabigatran is contraindicated in patients with hepatic impairment or liver disease expected to have any impact on survival. Currently, edoxaban is not available in the US or European markets. However, the Japanese label did not restrict use in hepatic dysfunction but advises care in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Topics: Absorption; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Liver Diseases; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Tissue Distribution; Venous Thromboembolism

The benefit-risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic liver disease is unclear.. We conducted a new-user, retrospective cohort study of patients with AF and chronic liver disease who were enrolled in a large, US-based administrative database between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of DOACs (as a class and individually) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with AF and chronic liver disease. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and hospitalization for major bleeding. Inverse probability treatment weights were used to balance the treatment groups on measured confounders.. Overall, 10 209 participants were included, with 4421 (43.2%) on warfarin, 2721 (26.7%) apixaban, 2211 (21.7%) rivaroxaban, and 851 (8.3%) dabigatran. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism were 2.2, 1.4, 2.6, and 4.4 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for major bleeding were 7.9, 6.5, 9.1, and 15.0 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. After inverse probability treatment weights, the risk of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism was significantly lower between DOACs as a class (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.46-0.90]) or apixaban (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19-0.82]) compared with warfarin, but not significantly different between rivaroxaban versus warfarin (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.47-1.21]) or rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 0.91-3.29]). Compared with warfarin, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was lower with DOACs as a class (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58-0.82]), apixaban (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46-0.78]), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62-1.0]). However, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was higher for rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.18-2.14]).. Among patients with AF and chronic liver disease, DOACs as a class were associated with lower risks of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding versus warfarin. However, the incidence of clinical outcomes among patients with AF and chronic liver disease varied between individual DOACs and warfarin, and in head-to-head DOAC comparisons.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Liver Diseases; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant with a large inter-individual variability. The present study is to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict several scenarios in clinical practice.. A whole-body PBPK model for rivaroxaban, which is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/5, 2J2 pathways and excreted via kidneys, was developed to predict the pharmacokinetics at different doses in healthy subjects and patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction. Hepatic clearance and drug-drug interactions (DDI) were estimated by in vitro in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) based on parameters obtained from in vitro experiments. To validate the model, observed concentrations were compared with predicted concentrations, and the impact of special scenarios was investigated.. The PBPK model successfully predicted the pharmacokinetics for healthy subjects and patients as well as DDIs. Sensitivity analysis shows that age, renal, and hepatic clearance are important factors affecting rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics. The predicted fold increase of rivaroxaban AUC values when combined administered with the inhibitors such as ketoconazole, ritonavir, and clarithromycin were 2.3, 2.2, and 1.3, respectively. When DDIs and hepatic dysfunction coexist, the fold increase of rivaroxaban exposure would increase significantly compared with one factor alone.. Our study using PBPK modeling provided a reasonable approach to evaluate exposure levels in special patients under special scenarios. Although further clinical study or real-life experience would certainly merit the current work, the modeling work so far would at least suggest caution of using rivaroxaban in complicated clinical settings.

Topics: Adult; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Clarithromycin; Computer Simulation; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Ketoconazole; Liver Diseases; Male; Models, Biological; Renal Insufficiency; Ritonavir; Rivaroxaban

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are drugs used in clinical practice since 2009 for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, and for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. The four DOACs, including the three factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) and one direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) provide oral anticoagulation therapy alternatives to Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Despite their clear advantages, the DOACs require on the part of the internist a thorough knowledge of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics to ensure their correct use, laboratory monitoring and the appropriate management of adverse events. This document represents a consensus paper on the use of DOACs by representatives of three Italian scientific societies: the Italian Society of Internal Medicine (SIMI), the Federation of the Associations of Hospital Managers (FADOI), and the Society for the Study of Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET). This document formulates expert opinion guidance for pragmatic managing, monitoring and reversing the anticoagulant effect of DOACs in both chronic and emergency settings. This practical guidance may help the internist to create adequate protocols for patients hospitalized ion internal medicine wards, where patients are often elderly subjects affected by poly-morbidities and renal insufficiency, and, thus, require particular attention to drug-drug interactions and peri-procedural protocols.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Competence; Consensus; Dabigatran; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Food-Drug Interactions; Humans; Internal Medicine; Italy; Liver Diseases; Perioperative Period; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Diseases; Portal Vein; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thrombosis

New oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are becoming available as alternatives to warfarin to prevent systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. An in-depth understanding of their pharmacology is invaluable for appropriate prescription and optimal management of patients receiving these drugs should unexpected complications (such as bleeding) occur, or the patient requires urgent surgery. The Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis has set out to inform physicians on the use of the different NOAC based on current available evidence focusing on: (i) selection of the most suitable patient groups to receive NOAC, (ii) laboratory measurements of NOAC in appropriate circumstances and (iii) management of patients taking NOAC in the perioperative period, and strategies to manage bleeding complications or 'reverse' the anticoagulant effects for urgent invasive procedures.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Tests; Blood Loss, Surgical; Contraindications; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Drug Substitution; Elective Surgical Procedures; Emergencies; Hematoma, Epidural, Spinal; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Liver Diseases; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia