rivaroxaban and Hemorrhage

Dental procedures can pose a risk of bleeding, and it is not uncommon for dentists to consult prescribing physicians regarding a mutual patient's antiplatelet and anticoagulant medication to prevent excessive bleeding during or after an upcoming procedure. However, there has been a growing controversy in the dental community surrounding the stoppage of these medications prior to dental procedures. Some believe that stopping these medications prior to dental procedures is necessary to reduce the risk of bleeding complications, while others argue that stopping them can increase the risk of stroke or other thromboembolic events. The debate has left many dentists and specialists unsure about the best course of action when it comes to managing bleeding risk during dental procedures.In this article, we will review the antithrombotic medications, indications, mechanism of action, and its effects on the coagulation pathway, laboratory testing and reversal agents. Also, we will explore the controversy surrounding the stoppage of novel anitplatelets (eg,: prasurgrel and ticagrelor), dual-antiplatelets, triple-antiplatelet, vitamin K antagonists (eg,: wafarin, coumadin), and direct oral anticoagulants (eg,: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, xarelto and endoxaban) in dentistry and examine the current evidence and guidelines for managing dental patients undergoing oral surgery.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Oral Surgical Procedures; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health issue associated with significantly increased risk of stroke. It remains uncertain whether oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm (HF-SR) could improve prognosis.. We performed a systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases for randomized controlled clinical trials assessing oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelets or placebo in patients with HF or ventricular dysfunction/cardiomyopathy without clinical HF and SR. The outcomes assessed were stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization.. Seven trials of 15,794 patients were eligible for our analyses. The overall follow-up duration was 32,367 patient-years corresponding to a mean follow-up of 2.05 years per patient. Four trials included patients treated with warfarin and three included patients treated with rivaroxaban. OAC was associated with reduced rate of stroke or systemic embolism compared to control (odds ratio (OR): 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44, 0.73, number needed to treat (NNT): 71.9) but higher rate of major bleeding (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.47, 2.50, number needed to harm (NNH): 57.1). In the subgroup analysis according to the type of OAC, rivaroxaban was associated with significantly reduced rate of stroke or systemic embolism (1.24 vs 1.97 events per 100 patient-years, respectively, OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.88, NNT: 82) and higher risk of major bleeding (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.26, 2.20) compared to antiplatelets or placebo. There was no significant differences between groups for the outcomes of myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization.. This analysis shows that any benefit of OAC for stroke prevention may be offset by an increased risk of major bleeding in HF-SR patients. A well-designed randomized controlled trial of newer safer OACs is needed in this population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamins

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adults. Little attention is given to pediatric VTE (PVTE). The objective of this study is to study the efficacy and safety of DOACs in published PVTE randomized control trials (RCTs). PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Cochrane Library, SinoMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until 2021, to identify RCTs that enrolled patients with VTE <18 years of age who received DOACs versus standard anticoagulation. Outcomes were evaluated using the Mantel-Haenszel method of random-effects model. Our study evaluated seven RCTs that included 1139 cases of PVTE, which had a low risk of publication and assessment bias. Compared with standard anticoagulation, patients receiving DOACs presented a lower rate of recurrent VTE (relative risk [RR], 0.42 [confidence interval {CI}, 0.20 to 0.89]), similar mortality rate (RR, 0.50 [CI, 0.07 to 3.57]), major bleeding (RR, 0.46 [CI, 0.14 to 1.57]), and higher clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (RR, 2.71 [CI, 1.05 to 7.02]) with low heterogeneity. Limiting to subgroups, dabigatran and rivaroxaban yielded similar findings, except for a higher incidence of nonmajor bleeding during rivaroxaban use. DOACs could be an alternative to standard anticoagulation in PVTE. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban have similar effects. IMPACT: In venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used as a substitution for standard anticoagulation in most situations for adults; however, little attention is paid to the pediatric population. For pediatric VTE, previous meta-analyses have emphasized the epidemiology, risk factors, and the use of traditional anticoagulants, and seldom reported the use of novel oral anticoagulants. This is the first meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that focuses on the efficacy outcomes and safety endpoints of DOACs compared with standard anticoagulation in pediatric VTE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Child; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The persistence of elevated rates of ischemic recurrences despite the use of antiplatelet therapy among patients with atherosclerotic disease together with the understanding of the pivotal role of coagulation in the thrombo-inflammatory processes involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and its complications has fostered the development of treatments targeting both platelets and coagulation, a strategy known as dual-pathway inhibition (DPI).. In this review we discuss the recent advancements in the understanding of the interplay between coagulation, platelets and inflammation involved in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis, as the rationale for the implementation of a DPI strategy. We also discuss the available pharmacodynamic (PD) evidence and clinical implications with the use of DPI in patients with atherosclerotic disease.. The implementation of a DPI by adding the so-called 'vascular dose of rivaroxaban' (i.e. 2.5 mg bis in die), on top of antiplatelet therapy has consistently been associated with reduced levels of thrombin generation in PD studies and with reduced ischemic event rates at the cost of increased bleeding compared to antiplatelet therapy alone. Further research is warranted to best define patients in whom a DPI regimen has the best safety and efficacy profile.

Topics: Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban

There are limited data about the frequency of urgent surgical emergencies among patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs). We conducted a systematic literature review of Medline and EMBASE for published English-language articles of adult patients receiving oral anticoagulant treatment (vitamin K antagonists, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) that reported on patients experiencing unplanned emergent or urgent surgery/procedure or trauma. Randomized trials, observational studies, and case series (50-100 cases) were included. The primary outcome was the frequency of unplanned urgent surgery or invasive procedures among OAC-treated patients with a focus on those not precipitated by the presence of major bleeding. The protocol was not registered. Funding was provided by Covis Pharmaceuticals. The search yielded 1367 potential studies of which 34 were included in the final review. One study reported the rate of urgent surgery/procedures among a large cohort of patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for atrial fibrillation (~ 1% per year). Another study reported the rate of bleeding or urgent surgery among OAC-treated patients experiencing a fracture or trauma (0.489% per patient-year). The remaining 32 studies were cohorts of OAC-treated patients who received reversal or hemostatic therapies for major bleeding or urgent surgery. A median of 28.8% of these patients underwent surgery or invasive procedure. Urgent surgery appears to be a common, yet understudied complication during OAC treatment potentially associated with high rates of adverse outcomes. With increased eligibility for OACs, future studies evaluating the management and outcomes in this setting are needed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

As the antithrombotic regimen that may best prevent ischaemic complications along with the lowest bleeding risk offset following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic regimens in patients without having an indication for chronic oral anticoagulation.. We conducted a PROSPERO-registered (CRD42021247924) systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating post-TAVI antithrombotic regimens up to April 2022. We estimated the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using a random-effects model in a frequentist pairwise and network metanalytic approach. We included seven studies comprising 4006 patients with a mean weighted follow-up of 12.9 months. Risk of all-cause death was significantly reduced with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared with low-dose rivaroxaban + 3-month single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.88), while no significant reduction was observed with SAPT vs. DAPT (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.67-1.58) and SAPT and DAPT compared with apixaban or edoxaban (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.32-1.14 and RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.34-1.02, respectively). SAPT was associated with a significant reduction of life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding compared with DAPT (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29-0.70), apixaban or edoxaban alone (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.79), and low-dose rivaroxaban + 3-month SAPT (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.57). There were no differences between the various regimens with respect to myocardial infarction, stroke, or systemic embolism.. Following TAVI in patients without an indication for chronic oral anticoagulant, SAPT more than halved the risk of bleeding compared with DAPT and direct oral anticoagulant-based regimens without significant ischaemic offset.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has been established as the treatment of choice for symptomatic aortic stenosis, while it is expanding in all risk-related group categories of patients, gaining gradually ground over the surgical approach. However, complications and adverse events are yet to be effectively limited and diminished with thrombotic and hemorrhagic events being rooted as a crucial topic of discussion. Favorable anticoagulation pharmacotherapy options are constantly being revised and tested, whilst guidelines are being modified to meet current clinical evidence. This review aims to systematically assess already existing guidelines on anticoagulation in post-TAVI patients and examine novel regimens for the specific use, like apixaban, rivaroxaban, and other anticoagulants, essentially constructing a holistic point of view on future progress on this matter. The added complexity brought by coagulation-affecting comorbidities such as atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and more contributes to the direct association of the topic to the quality of healthcare as a public service. The literature was systematically searched to examine the effectiveness and safety of various anticoagulation treatments and cross-evaluate them based on the according category of patients that were assigned to. Clinical trials, observational studies and systematic reviews were included and, eventually, conclusive remarks and future considerations were developed and presented. In the category of patients without prior indication to anticoagulation, SAPT was proven safer and still effective, when antiplatelet therapies were compared, while a comparison of antiplatelet versus anticoagulation strategies noted the first one, with limited data, as the optimal one. Lastly, direct oral anticoagulants were shown to be safe substitutes for vitamin K antagonists for patients with prior indication to anticoagulation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome

The administration of an anticoagulant in patients with liver disease (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-NASH, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-NAFLD, chronic hepatitis, or cirrhosis) who have an indication (atrial fibrillation, venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism) is challenging because there is an imbalance between thrombosis and bleeding. There is a need to focus our attention on preventing risk factors because diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, smoking, and sedentary behavior are risk factors for both NASH/NAFLD and AF, and these patients require anticoagulant treatment. Patients with advanced liver disease (Child-Pugh C) were excluded from studies, so vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are still recommended. Currently, VKAs are recommended for other conditions (antiphospholipid syndrome, mitral valve stenosis, and mechanical valve prosthesis). Amongst the patients under chronic anticoagulant treatment, especially for the elderly, bleeding as a result of the improper use of warfarin is one of the important causes of emergency admissions due to adverse reactions. DOACs are considered to be efficient and safe, with apixaban offering superior protection against stroke and a good safety profile as far as major bleeding is concerned compared to warfarin. DOACs are safe in the Child-Pugh A and B classes (except rivaroxaban), and in the Child-Pugh C class are contraindicated. Given that there are certain and reliable data for chronic kidney disease regarding the recommendations, in liver function impairment more randomized studies must be carried out, as the current data are still uncertain. In particular, DOACs have a simple administration, minimal medication interactions, a high safety and effectiveness profile, and now a reversal agent is available (for dabigatran and idarucizumab). Patients are also statistically more compliant and do not require INR monitoring.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic regimens and their combinations in preventing thrombotic incidents in patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (S-ASCVD).. A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The primary comprehensive endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction, while the secondary endpoints were cardiovascular death, all-cause stroke, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause death. The safety endpoint was major bleeding. Bayesian network meta-regression analysis in R software was used to calculate the final effect size and to correct for the effect of follow-up time on the outcome effect size.. Twelve studies reporting 122,190 patients with eight antithrombotic regimens were included in this systematic review. For the primary composite endpoint, low-dose aspirin plus clopidogrel 75 mg (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.87) and low-dose aspirin plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.82) showed significantly better efficacy than clopidogrel monotherapy, and the efficacy was comparable among the first two regimens. Unfortunately, none of the active regimens significantly decreased all-cause death, cardiovascular death branch, and all-cause stroke as part of the secondary endpoints. Low-dose aspirin plus ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.94) and low-dose aspirin plus ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95) had a significant advantage in myocardial infarction compared with low-dose aspirin monotherapy, while low-dose aspirin plus 2.5 mg rivaroxaban twice daily (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.94) was better than low-dose aspirin in the treatment of ischemic stroke. In the major bleeding branch, low-dose aspirin plus ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.70-2.90), low-dose aspirin plus ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.70-2.60), low-dose aspirin plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.30-2.00), and rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.20-1.90) showed higher major bleeding risk compared with low-dose aspirin.. Considering MACEs, myocardial infarction, all kinds of stroke, ischemic stroke, and major bleeding, low-dose aspirin plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily should be considered the preferred regimen for S-ASCVD patients with low bleeding risk.

Topics: Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Bayes Theorem; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Regression Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Large-scaled post-marketing surveillance studies (PMSSs) of 4 direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) were conducted since 2011 in Japan, and the results of the last one have recently been published. Each reported a more than acceptable ischemic stroke prevention. The major bleeding rates were also acceptably low and comparable to each other in the PMSSs of dabigatran (J-dabigatran), rivaroxaban (XAPASS), and edoxaban (ETNA-AF-Japan). However, the incidence in PMSS of apixaban (STANDARD) was more than double the others. This finding appeared to contradict the globally accepted theory that apixaban is less likely than other DOACs to cause bleeding events. Possible responsible mechanisms included (1) the age and kidney function, (2) concomitant antiplatelet therapy, (3) drug actions, (4) follow-up duration, and (5) dose reduction criteria. Similarities in the clinical background shared by the 4 different PMSSs' participants and knowledge from previous studies did not support a dominant contribution of any of those former 4 factors to the increased major bleeding incidence in STANDARD. A possibility of the 5th factor was then examined. An estimated calculation we created showed that apixaban's dose reduction criteria was strict enough to considerably reduce the opportunity for participants to take its reduced rather than standard dose. We then successfully simulated how the "strict" dose reduction criteria would have increased the bleeding event rates under DOAC therapy. The discussion in this review may therefore raise a question about the validity of the current dose reduction criteria of apixaban for Japanese AF patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

This review aims to assess the treatment options for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) based on the most robust level of evidence recommendations and suggestions based on expert opinion.. Several classes of anticoagulants have been studied in the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Since the CLOT trial, guidelines recommend the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for the treatment of this condition. However, since 2018, some direct oral anticoagulants became an alternative first-line treatment for CAT. Three Xa antagonists (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) proved to be at least as effective as the LMWH strategy for the short-term prevention of VTE recurrence. The right choice of treatment in the context of anticoagulation strategy, thrombo-hemorrhagic risk management, and a patient's comorbidities represents a challenge. The correct management of CAT and a more individualized approach are needed to identify risk factors and offer the best treatment for each patient.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a condition in which a clot forms in the deep veins, most commonly of the leg. It occurs in approximately one in 1000 people. If left untreated, the clot can travel up to the lungs and cause a potentially life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). Previously, a DVT was treated with the anticoagulants heparin and vitamin K antagonists. However, two forms of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed: oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) and oral factor Xa inhibitors, which have characteristics that may be favourable compared to conventional treatment, including oral administration, a predictable effect, lack of frequent monitoring or dose adjustment and few known drug interactions. DOACs are now commonly being used for treating DVT: recent guidelines recommended DOACs over conventional anticoagulants for both DVT and PE treatment. This Cochrane Review was first published in 2015. It was the first systematic review to measure the effectiveness and safety of these drugs in the treatment of DVT. This is an update of the 2015 review.  OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of oral DTIs and oral factor Xa inhibitors versus conventional anticoagulants for the long-term treatment of DVT.. The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 1 March 2022.. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which people with a DVT, confirmed by standard imaging techniques, were allocated to receive an oral DTI or an oral factor Xa inhibitor compared with conventional anticoagulation or compared with each other for the treatment of DVT.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), recurrent DVT and PE. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major bleeding, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and quality of life (QoL). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.. We identified 10 new studies with 2950 participants for this update. In total, we included 21 RCTs involving 30,895 participants. Three studies investigated oral DTIs (two dabigatran and one ximelagatran), 17 investigated oral factor Xa inhibitors (eight rivaroxaban, five apixaban and four edoxaban) and one three-arm trial investigated both a DTI (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban). Overall, the studies were of good methodological quality. Meta-analysis comparing DTIs to conventional anticoagulation showed no clear difference in the rate of recurrent VTE (odds ratio (OR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 1.65; 3 studies, 5994 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), recurrent DVT (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.66; 3 studies, 5994 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), fatal PE (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.29 to 6.02; 3 studies, 5994 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), non-fatal PE (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.59; 3 studies, 5994 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.08; 1 study, 2489 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). DTIs reduced the rate of major bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.89; 3 studies, 5994 participants; high-certainty evidence).   For oral factor Xa inhibitors compared with conventional anticoagulation, meta-analysis demonstrated no clear difference in recurrent VTE (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01; 13 studies, 17,505 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), recurrent DVT (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.01; 9 studies, 16,439 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), fatal PE (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.02; 6 studies, 15,082 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), non-fatal PE (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.27; 7 studies, 15,166 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.14; 9 studies, 10,770 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Meta-analysis showed a reduced rate of major bleeding with oral factor Xa inhibitors compared with conventional anticoagulation (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.89; 17 studies, 18,066 participants; high-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The current review suggests that DOACs may be superior to conventional therapy in terms of safety (major bleeding), and are probably equivalent in terms of efficacy. There is probably little or no difference between DOACs and conventional anticoagulation in the prevention of recurrent VTE, recurrent DVT, pulmonary embolism and all-cause mortal

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

To conduct an update of the ASCO venous thromboembolism (VTE) guideline.. After publication of potentially practice-changing clinical trials, identified through ASCO's signals approach to updating, an updated systematic review was performed for two guideline questions: perioperative thromboprophylaxis and treatment of VTE. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between November 1, 2018, and June 6, 2022.. Five RCTs provided information that contributed to changes to the 2019 recommendations. Two RCTs addressed direct factor Xa inhibitors (either rivaroxaban or apixaban) for extended thromboprophylaxis after surgery. Each of these postoperative trials had important limitations but suggested that these two oral anticoagulants are safe and effective in the settings studied. An additional three RCTs addressed apixaban in the setting of VTE treatment. Apixaban was effective in reducing the risk of recurrent VTE, with a low risk of major bleeding.. Apixaban and rivaroxaban were added as options for extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis after cancer surgery, with a weak strength of recommendation. Apixaban was also added as an option for the treatment of VTE, with high quality of evidence and a strong recommendation.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Patients with chronic kidney disease are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban has been shown to provide similar efficacy and a lower risk of bleeding compared with vitamin K antagonists for the treatment and prevention of VTE. Rivaroxaban has been studied in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment, and this review summarizes current knowledge supporting its use in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl] of 15 to < 30 mL/min) for the prevention, treatment, or prophylaxis of VTE. Clinical pharmacology studies have demonstrated an increase in rivaroxaban systemic exposure, factor Xa inhibition, and prothrombin time with decreasing renal function. These changes reach a plateau with comparable increases in exposure among individuals with moderate or severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease. The clinical development program for the treatment and prevention of VTE as well as prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following orthopedic surgery excluded patients with CrCl < 30 mL/min; however, a limited number of patients with severe renal impairment were enrolled. Efficacy outcomes in these patients with severe renal impairment were not meaningfully different from those of patients with higher levels of renal function. There was also no increase in the incidence of major bleeding with rivaroxaban in patients with CrCl < 30 mL/min. Taken together, these pharmacological and clinical data suggest that in patients with severe renal impairment, the approved dosages of rivaroxaban can be used in the treatment and prevention of VTE and for prophylaxis of DVT after hip or knee replacement surgery.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is characterized by some risk of major adverse events despite the availability of effective medical therapies for secondary prevention. There is emerging evidence suggesting that thrombin partly contributes to this residual risk. In fact, thrombin (i.e., activated coagulation factor II) triggers not only the conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin but also platelet activation and various pathways responsible for pro-atherogenic and/or pro-inflammatory effects through interaction with protease activated receptors. To reduce the risk associated with thrombin activation, oral anticoagulants antagonists of vitamin K showed promise, but were associated with unacceptable bleeding rates. Direct oral anticoagulants targeting the activated factors X and II carry a lower risk of bleeding than vitamin K antagonists. Rivaroxaban, a direct inhibitor of activated factor X approved at the dose of 20 mg once daily for the prevention of thromboembolic events, has been also investigated at a reduced dose of 2.5 mg twice daily in several alternative scenarios of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, in combination with standard of care. Current guidelines recommend that low-dose rivaroxaban is given in an adjunct to standard therapy to patients with stable atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes at low bleeding risk. Several studies are underway to evaluate its putative benefits in other clinical settings.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombin; Vitamin K

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are common in cancer management and complicate the choice of anticoagulation in cancer-associated thrombosis. Cancer confers an increased risk of thrombotic events. Also, more bleeding events are observed in those who receive anticoagulation compared to those without cancer. In the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been found to be at least as effective as low-molecular weight heparins, which became the standard of care after several trials demonstrated superiority over vitamin K antagonists. Non-inferiority compared to low-molecular weight heparins has been shown for rivaroxaban, edoxaban and apixaban with a signal of fewer recurrent thrombotic events, albeit with an increase in bleeding events. Yet, potentially major pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions have been identified as a reason to withhold DOACs and to rather choose an alternative. Practical guidance on what constitutes a major pharmacokinetic interaction and/or how to deal with these interactions in clinical practice is limited. Hence, here we have provided a framework to allow clinicians to better deal with pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between DOACs and cancer therapies in the management of cancer-associated thrombosis. In this review we have discussed the current literature, how the pharmacokinetic profile links to the label information on DDI, and have provided a practical proposal, applied to a clinical case.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Drug Interactions; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with bleeding. Patients often stop taking DOACs due to non-major bleeding, which may lead to stroke recurrence. We aimed to determine the risk of non-major bleeding using different DOACs to prevent strokes in atrial fibrillation (AF).. A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting non-major bleeding events in patients taking DOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In this frequency-based network meta-analysis, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used for reporting. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA), the relative ranking probability of each group was generated.. Nineteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (involving 85,826 patients) were included. For clinically relevant non-major bleeding, the risk for bleeding was lowest for apixaban (SUCRA, 93.9), followed by that for VKAs (SUCRA, 47.7), dabigatran (SUCRA, 40.3), rivaroxaban (SUCRA, 35.9), and edoxaban (SUCRA, 32.2). The minor bleeding safety of DOACs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: apixaban (SUCRA, 78.1), edoxaban (SUCRA, 69.4), dabigatran (SUCRA, 48.8), and VKAs (SUCRA, 3.7).. Based on current evidence, for stroke prevention in patients with AF, the safest DOAC is apixaban in terms of non-major bleeding. This suggests that apixaban may have a lower risk of non-major bleeding than other anticoagulants and may help provide some clinical reference for choosing a more appropriate drug for the patient.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Review management strategies for patients receiving nonvitamin K direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. Updated clinical trials and guidelines continue to further define optimal management for patients on DOACs requiring emergency surgery or procedural interventions. In addition, specific bleeding management strategies that include either specific or nonspecific antagonists are becoming available.. Most currently used DOACs are factor Xa inhibitors and should be stopped for 24-48 h for elective surgical procedures in patients at risk for bleeding and potentially longer for dabigatran, depending on renal function. Idarucizumab, a specific dabigatran reversal agent, has been studied in surgical patients and is currently approved for use. For Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban, although andexanet alfa is approved for medical bleeds, it is not approved for surgical patients, has a short duration of effect, and costs $12 500 per gram. When managing DOAC-treated patients requiring emergency surgery, when stopping the DOAC and delaying surgery is not feasible, standard approaches should include hemostatic, hemodynamic, and transfusional support. Due to higher risk associated with therapeutic agents used to manage DOAC-related bleeding, increasing data supports the potential off-label use of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants for older adult patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. Pairwise and network meta-analyses.. Patients with AF aged ≥75 years.. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for published randomized controlled trials and adjusted observational studies evaluating the use of a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), vitamin K antagonist, or antiplatelet drug for the prevention of stroke. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the composite of stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleedings.. This study included 38 studies enrolling 1,022,908 older adult patients with AF. Results from pairwise meta-analyses showed that NOACs were superior to warfarin for all outcomes, except that dabigatran increased the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings. Aspirin was associated with a higher risk of SSE and ischemic stroke than warfarin or NOACs. Results of network meta-analyses indicated that apixaban significantly reduced the risk of SSE, major bleedings, and GI bleedings than warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran. Apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran reduced the risk of ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding compared to warfarin. Dabigatran showed lower risk of all-cause mortality than warfarin and of intracranial bleeding than rivaroxaban.. NOACs are of at least equal efficacy, or even superior to warfarin. The safety profile of individual NOAC agents was significantly different, as apixaban performs better than the other oral anticoagulants in reducing major bleeding and GI bleeding, whereas dabigatran increased the risk of GI bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Altered direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) plasma levels can lead either to spontaneous hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications. We describe a case of suspected altered apixaban disposition in a patient with an upper gastrointestinal cancer resection treated with apixaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Diagnosis of ischemic stroke for left hemiparesis was confirmed due to recent emergence of a hypodense area in the posterior capsular nucleus of ischemic reference in a context of binuclear capsular lacunar lesions. Thus, apixaban underexposure was suspected from anamnestic data and oral anticoagulation was switched to parenteral at the next scheduled dose for stroke recurrence. Before switching apixaban pharmacokinetic analysis was performed and unexpectedly showed apixaban plasma overexposure. After 3 days from the switch, the patient experienced spontaneous bleeding complications, for which the risk-benefit profile of continuing anticoagulant treatment for stroke recurrences warranted treatment discontinuation. Unexpected DOAC plasma exposure may present in special patient populations with thrombotic and bleeding complications. Though universally recognized therapeutic ranges have yet to be established for DOACs, periodic drug monitoring may aid in guiding optimization of DOAC therapy and reduce the risk of adverse events in special patient populations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Tract; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) is a frequent manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE), accounting for up to 50% cases of lower‑extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). As compared with proximal DVT, IDDVT is more frequently associated with transient risk factors and less often occurs unprovoked or in the presence of permanent risk factors. IDDVT generally carries a significantly lower risk of proximal extension, post‑thrombotic syndrome, and recurrence than proximal DVT. Nevertheless, some patient subgroups, such as those with active cancer, other predisposing permanent risk factors, prior VTE, unprovoked IDDVT, persistently restricted mobility, and trifurcation or bilateral involvement, exhibit a non‑negligible recurrence risk. Unlike in proximal DVT, the optimal therapeutic management of IDDVT remains uncertain. In clinical practice, the vast majority of IDDVT patients are managed with anticoagulation rather than with surveillance serial compression ultrasonography, which tends to be reserved to individuals at a high bleeding risk. Available data seem to favor anticoagulant therapy over no anticoagulation, thanks to a significant reduction in the risk for proximal extension and recurrence, without increased bleeding risk. Recent results of the RIDTS (Rivaroxaban for the Treatment of Symptomatic Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis) randomized clinical trial with rivaroxaban further support the use of anticoagulant therapy for 3 months over shorter durations (eg, ≤6 weeks). In this review, we offer an updated overview of the epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical course of IDDVT, with a focus on the therapeutic management in light of current guideline recommendations and most recent evidence. We also present real‑life clinical cases of IDDVT with proposed therapeutic approaches, and highlight major challenges and gaps in this field.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Advancing age is a risk factor for developing non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). We assessed the comparative effectiveness, safety, costs, and healthcare utilization associated with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients of advanced age managed in the United States (US).. We conducted a systematic review of Medline and Embase through April 2023 to identify real-world evidence (RWE) studies of older adults (at least 65+ years of age) with either NVAF or VTE who received either rivaroxaban or warfarin in the US and reported an outcome of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), ischemic stroke (IS), recurrent VTE, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, costs, or healthcare resource utilization. We classified each outcome of interest per study as "positive" (lower risk), "negative" (higher risk), or "neutral" based upon the summary effect size of rivaroxaban versus warfarin.. Twenty-nine RWE studies met inclusion criteria, mostly (83%) in NVAF populations. For SSE with rivaroxaban versus warfarin, 68.8% of studies showed positive effects and 31.2% showed neutral outcome. For major bleeding, 57.7% showed neutral effects, 38.5% showed negative effects, and 3.8% of studies showed positive effects with rivaroxaban versus warfarin. Of the two studies reporting cost data, both were positive, showing lower costs for SSE for rivaroxaban versus warfarin and neutral cost for major bleeding costs.. This systematic review supports findings from subgroup analyses of randomized controlled trials that, compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban is associated with generally neutral or positive effects on thrombosis and a mixed picture on bleeding outcomes in older adults with either NVAF or VTE treated in the United States.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Limited real-world data show that rivaroxaban following dosage criteria from either ROCKET AF [20 mg/day or 15 mg/day if creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 50 mL/min] or J-ROCKET AF (15 mg/day or 10 mg/day if CrCl < 50 mL/min) is associated with comparable risks of thromboembolism and bleeding with each other in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We are aimed to study whether these observations differ between Asian and non-Asian subjects.. A systematic review and meta-analysis with random effects was conducted to estimate the aggregate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using PubMed and MEDLINE databases from 8 September 2011 to 31 December 2022 searched for adjusted observational studies that reported relevant clinical outcomes of NVAF patients receiving rivaroxaban 10 mg/day if CrCl > 50 mL/min, on-label dose rivaroxaban eligible for ROCKET AF or J-ROCKET AF, and rivaroxaban 20 mg/day if CrCl < 50 mL/min. Effectiveness and safety endpoints were compared between ROCKET AF and J-ROCKET AF dosing regimen in Asian and non-Asian subjects, separately. Also, risks of events of rivaroxaban 10 mg/day despite of CrCl > 50 mL/min and rivaroxaban 20 mg/day despite of CrCl < 50 mL/min were compared to that of 'ROCKET AF/J-ROCKET AF dosing'. Sensitivity analyses were performed by sequential elimination of each study from the pool. The meta-regression analysis was performed to explore the influence of potential factors on the effectiveness and safety outcomes. Eighteen studies involving 67 571 Asian and 54 882 non-Asian patients were included. Rivaroxaban following J-ROCKET AF criteria was associated with comparable risks of thromboembolism in the Asian subgroup, whereas rivaroxaban following J-ROCKET AF criteria was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR:1.30; 95% CI:1.05-1.60) compared with that of ROCKET AF criteria in the non-Asian population. There were no differences in risks of major bleeding between rivaroxaban following J-ROCKET AF vs. ROCKET AF criteria either in the Asian or non-Asian population. The use of rivaroxaban 10 mg despite of CrCl > 50 mL/min was associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism (HR:1.64; 95% CI:1.28-2.11) but lower risk of major bleeding (HR:0.72; 95% CI:0.57-0.90) compared with eligible dosage criteria. The use of rivaroxaban 20 mg despite of CrCl < 50 mL/min was associated with worse clinical outcomes in the risks of thromboembolism (HR:1.32; 95% CI:1.09-1.59), mortality (HR:1.33; 95% CI:1.10-1.59), and major bleeding (HR:1.26; 95% CI:1.03-1.53) compared with eligible dosage criteria. The pooled results were generally in line with the primary effectiveness and safety outcomes by removing a single study at one time. Meta-regression analyses failed to detect the bias in most potential patient characteristics associated with the clinical outcomes.. Rivaroxaban dosing regimen following J-ROCKET criteria may serve as an alternative to ROCKET AF criteria for the Asian population with NVAF, whereas the dosing regimen following ROCKET AF criteria was more favourable for the non-Asian population. The use of rivaroxaban 10 mg despite of CrCl > 50 mL/min was associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism but a lower risk of major bleeding, while use of rivaroxaban 20 mg despite of CrCl < 50 mL/min was associated with worse outcome in most clinical events.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Off-Label Use; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Although older patients with atrial fibrillation are at heightened risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events, their optimal treatment choice remains uncertain.. This meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials that compared thromboembolic or bleeding outcomes between a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and reported outcomes for patients aged ≥75 years with atrial fibrillation. The efficacy outcome was the composite of stroke and systemic embolism. Safety outcomes included major bleeding, any clinically relevant bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage. Each DOAC and VKA was compared pairwise in a network meta-analysis. High- and low-dose regimens and factor IIa and Xa inhibitors were also compared. Seven randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. Stroke and systemic embolism risks did not differ significantly among DOACs. There were no significant differences in major bleeding between each DOAC and VKA. Intracranial hemorrhage risk was significantly lower with dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban than with VKA and rivaroxaban, which had similar risks. High-dose regimens led to lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism compared with VKA and low-dose regimens, with both doses having similar bleeding risks.. In patients aged ≥75 years with atrial fibrillation, DOACs were associated with fewer thromboembolic events compared with VKA, whereas dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban were associated with lower risks of intracranial hemorrhage compared with VKA and rivaroxaban.. URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/. Unique identifier: CRD42022329557.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to explore the efficacy and safety of different antiplatelet or anticoagulation drugs in chronic coronary syndromes patients.. Electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases) were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating different antiplatelet or anticoagulation drugs (aspirin, aspirin + clopidogrel, aspirin + clopidogrel + cilostazol, clopidogrel/prasugrel + aspirin, aspirin + rivaoxaban 2.5 mg, aspirin + ticagrelor 60 mg, aspirin + ticagrelor 90 mg, clopidogrel or rivroxaban 5 mg) versus placebo for treatment chronic coronary syndromes patients. Outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events, all cause death, major bleeding and myocardial infarction. A random-effect Bayesian NMA was conducted for outcomes of interest, and results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals. The NMA was performed using R Software with a GeMTC package. A Bayesian NMA was performed and relative ranking of agents was assessed using surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities.. Ten randomized controlled trials met criteria for inclusion and finally included in this NMA. In head-to-head comparison, no significant difference was observed between all antithrombotic treatment strategies with respect to primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events. In head-to-head comparison, no significant difference was observed between all antithrombotic treatment strategies with respect to all cause death. Clopidogrel/prasugrel + aspirin (OR = 3.8, 95% credible intervals [CrI]: 1.3-12.0, P < .05) and aspirin + rivaroxaban 2.5 mg (OR = 3.1, 95%CrI: 1.1-9.5, P < .05) was associated with an increase of the major bleeding. Compared with aspirin alone, aspirin + clopidogrel (OR = 0.42, 95%CrI: 0.22-0.76, P < .05) and aspirin + ticagrelor 90 mg (OR = 0.42, 95%CrI: 0.17-0.95, P < .05) was associated with a decrease of the myocardial infarction.. Myocardial infarction was significantly lower when adding clopidogrel or ticagrelor 90 mg to aspirin than those in the aspirin alone group. However, clopidogrel/prasugrel and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg was associated with an increase of the major bleeding than aspirin alone.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Bayes Theorem; Clopidogrel; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Rivaroxaban; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Low-dose rivaroxaban is often given to patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) around the world, but the rationale for its use remains unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of standard- or low-dose rivaroxaban in patients with AF through systematic review of literature with meta-analysis.. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Clinical Trials.gov, the Cochrane Library, and Bayer trial website from inception of each database until June 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the pooled effect estimates.. Two RCTs and 17 cohort studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Indirect comparison of RCTs showed no significant difference between the two rivaroxaban dosages in risk of efficacy or safety outcomes (p > 0.05). Indirect comparison of cohort studies showed a lower risk of MACE among Caucasians in standard-dose group (HR 0.779; 95% CI 0.687-0.884; p < 0.001). Bleeding outcomes did not differ significantly between the two dosage regimens in Asian or Caucasian populations, except that the standard dose was associated with higher risk of major bleeding among elderly Caucasian patients (HR 1.329; 95% CI 1.141-1.547; p < 0.001). The quality of evidence was rated ranging from very low to low for all the efficacy and safety outcomes.. In Caucasians with AF, standard-dose rivaroxaban may prevent MACE significantly better than low-dose treatment. Further studies in Asians are needed to verify the advantages of the standard dose.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; White People

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) are emerging treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data on the safety, efficacy, and medications for LAAC devices in patients with AF are lacking. We aimed to investigate the incidence of all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding in AF patients with LAAC devices and DOACs. Moreover, we aimed to investigate the incidence rate of device-related thrombus (DRT) and the medications used in the management of AF patients with LAAC devices to gain insights into achieving better outcome. Based on a literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases between January 2015 and December 2020, eight LAAC device studies that used WATCHMAN and Amulet, and three DOAC studies that used rivaroxaban, with a total of 24,055 AF patients (LAAC devices, n = 2855; DOAC, n = 21,200), were included. A random-effects model was used to incorporate heterogeneity among studies. The pooled incidence of events per person-years were as follows: all-cause mortality, 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.10) for WATCHMAN, 0.04 (95% CI 0.00-0.14) for Amulet, and 0.03 (95% CI 0.01-0.04) for rivaroxaban; stroke; 0.02 (95% CI 0.00-0.04) for WATCHMAN, 0 for Amulet, and 0.01 (95% CI 0.01-0.02) for rivaroxaban; major bleeding, 0.04 (95% CI 0.02-0.06) for WATCHMAN, 0.02 (95% CI 0.00-0.06) for Amulet, and 0.02 (95% CI 0.01-0.03) for rivaroxaban. The incidence rate of DRT was 2.3%, and complications were reported in 9%. The incidence of all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding were similar between LAAC devices and DOACs. The rate of complications was acceptable, and those of DRT were lower than the average incidence reported in previous studies. However, further follow-up is needed. Concomitant anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies should be further evaluated to find the optimal regimen for AF patients with LAAC devices.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The primary aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare the incidence of venous thromboembolisms (VTE) and bleeding risk following the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for arthroscopic knee surgery (AKS). This study assumed the null hypothesis which was that there will be no difference in the incidence of VTE and bleeding risk when comparing no treatment, pharmacological treatment, and non-pharmacological treatment for preventing VTE events following AKS.. A systematic electronic search of CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov was carried out. All English language prospective randomized clinical trials published from date of database inception to November 21, 2021 were eligible for inclusion. All papers addressing arthroscopic knee surgery were eligible for inclusion regardless of timing of surgery, operation, surgical technique, or rehabilitation. Multiple random effects NMAs were conducted to compare all treatments for each outcome. The primary outcome was the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and secondary outcomes consisted of overall deep vein thrombosis (DVT), symptomatic DVT, asymptomatic DVT, and all-cause mortality. Adverse outcomes consisted of major and minor bleeding, as well as adverse events.. A total of nine studies with 4526 patients were included for analysis. There were 1054 patients in the no treatment/placebo group (NT/Placebo), 1646 patients in the graduated compression stockings, 810 patients in the extended-duration (> 10 days) low molecular weight heparin (Ext-LMWH) group, 650 patients in the short-duration (< 10 days) LMWH group (Short-LMWH), and 356 patients in the rivaroxaban group. GCS, Ext-LMWH, Short-LMWH and rivaroxaban all demonstrated low risks of PE, symptomatic DVT, asymptomatic DVT, combined DVT and all-cause mortality. Similarly, all interventions demonstrated a low risk of major bleeding.. There is no significant difference in the risk reduction of PEs, symptomatic DVTs, major/minor bleeding, and/or all-cause mortality when using LWMH (including short or extended regimens), rivaroxaban, graduated compression stockings or no treatment following arthroscopic knee surgery. Future primary research on the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis following arthroscopic knee surgery should stratify outcomes based on key patient (i.e., age, sex, comorbidities) and surgical (i.e., major vs. minor surgery) characteristics and should include acetylsalicylic acid as an intervention.. I, network meta-analysis of Level I studies.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroscopy; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thrombosis

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are an underrecognised group with significant thrombotic risk. This risk is modifiable with the use of aggressive secondary preventative efforts, including optimisation of antithrombotic therapy. Appropriate antithrombotic selection for patients with PAD requires appropriate assessment of thrombotic and bleeding risk. Recent Canadian guidelines have recommended dual pathway therapy initiation for stable PAD and post-revascularisation patients. However, there is ongoing discussion about how to identify PAD patients who stand to benefit most from these therapies while trying to minimise harm from bleeding. Clinical equipoise also persists around questions such as the utility of dual antiplatelet therapy in conjunction with rivaroxaban after high-risk endovascular interventions and the optimal therapy for patients experiencing acute limb ischemia. In patients with chronic PAD and high-risk comorbidities or limb features, or in patients after revascularisation, dual pathway therapy with low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin has emerged as the only regimen to reduce major adverse cardiovascular and limb events while maintaining an acceptable bleeding profile. After endovascular revascularisation, limited-duration (< 30 days) clopidogrel may be added to rivaroxaban and aspirin in selected high-risk patients at the provider's discretion. After acute limb ischemia, the risk of another vascular event is exceptionally high, but there is no high-quality evidence to guide decision making for intensified antithrombotic therapy. Randomised investigations addressing this question are urgently needed to better serve this high-risk and vulnerable population.

Topics: Aspirin; Canada; Clinical Decision-Making; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban

The real-world studies on recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding events of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in VTE patients have reported conflicting findings. Our study aimed to provide the direct comparison evidence of different NOACs for VTE patients in clinical practice settings.. Search of the medical literature was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Clinical Trials.gov, and the Cochrane Library from inception to March 22, 2021. Among the 19,996 citations retrieved, a total of 63,144 patients from 6 studies were analyzed. Clinical outcomes included recurrent VTE, death, and different bleeding events.. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) analysis suggested that apixaban had significant lower bleeding riskthan rivaroxaban (major, minor and any bleeding: HR = 0.61, 0.56, 0.70; p = 0.008, < 0.0001, 0.006, respectively), but no statistics difference found in recurrent VTE events (HR = 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.47, p = 0.93). There was no significant difference of major bleeding between dabigatran and rivaroxaban (odds ratios (OR) = 0.41, 95% CI 0.09-1.90, p = 0.25), apixaban and dabigatran (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.15-2.72, p = 0.83). No significant difference was found in the comparison of edoxaban and other NOACs in VTE recurrence, major bleeding and composite outcome.. In the prevention of bleeding events, apixaban was associated with a lower risk than rivaroxaban, but equivalent efficacy for different NOACs in prevention of recurrent VTE. Evidence generated from the meta-analysis based on real-world data can help to guide selection between apixaban and rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice.. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statements and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019140553).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Available data have shown an association between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) plasma concentration and clinical, particularly bleeding, events. Factors that may influence DOAC plasma concentration are therefore the focus of particular attention. Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analyses can help in identifying such factors while providing predictive models. The main aim of the present study was to identify all the PopPK models to date for the four most frequently used DOACs (dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban). The secondary aim was to use these models to simulate different DOAC plasma concentration-time profiles in relevant clinical scenarios. The results of our model-based simulations confirm the clinical relevance of the known major factors influencing DOAC exposure and support the current approved dose adaptation, at least for atrial fibrillation. They also highlight how the accumulation of covariates, not currently considered for dose adaptation due to their seemingly minor influence on DOAC exposure, lead to supratherapeutic blood concentrations and could thus enhance the risk of major bleeding. The present results therefore question DOAC dose adaptation in the presence of these covariates, such as drug-drug interaction or genotypes, alongside the known existing covariates. As the overall effect of accumulation of several covariates could be difficult to apprehend for the clinicians, PopPK modeling could represent an interesting approach for informed precision dosing and to improve personalized prescription of DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are medications commonly used in patients with atrial fibrillation and other cardiovascular conditions. Both warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants are susceptible to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). DDIs are an important cause of adverse drug reactions and exact a large toll on the health care system. DDI for warfarin mainly involve moderate to strong inhibitors/inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9, which is responsible for the elimination of the more potent S-isomer of warfarin. However, inhibitor/inducers of CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 may also cause DDI with warfarin. Recognition of these precipitating agents along with increased frequency of monitoring when these agents are initiated or discontinued will minimize the impact of warfarin DDI. Direct oral anticoagulants are mainly affected by medications strongly affecting the permeability glycoprotein (P-gp), and to a lesser extent, strong CYP3A4 inhibitors/inducers. Dabigatran and edoxaban are affected by P-gp modulation. Strong inducers of CYP3A4 or P-gp should be avoided in all patients taking direct oral anticoagulant unless previously proven to be otherwise safe. Simultaneous strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors should be avoided in patients taking apixaban and rivaroxaban. Concomitant antiplatelet/anticoagulant use confers additive risk for bleeding, but their combination is unavoidable in many cases. Minimizing duration of concomitant anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy as indicated by evidence-based clinical guidelines is the best way to reduce the risk of bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are used for prevention of thromboembolic events, but their use in dialysis patients is debatable. This study investigated the available evidence for the use of NOACs in dialysis patients. Online databases were systematically searched for eligible studies including pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, cohort studies, and randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing NOAC with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or no anticoagulant treatment. Newcastle Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of bias tool were used for quality assessment. Twenty studies were identified (nine PK studies, two RCTs, and nine cohort studies). Most of the studies investigated apixaban or rivaroxaban. In dialysis patients, less accumulation was reported with apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to dabigatran and edoxaban. PK studies indicate that high dose apixaban or rivaroxaban should be avoided. The two RCTs (rivaroxaban/apixaban vs. VKA) were small and underpowered regarding stroke and bleeding outcomes. Most cohort studies found apixaban superior to VKA, whereas comparison of rivaroxaban with VKA yielded conflicting results. Cohort studies comparing apixaban high dose (5 mg) with low dose (2.5 mg) twice daily suggest a lower risk of stroke with high dose but also a higher risk of bleeding with high dose. Apixaban versus no anticoagulation was compared in one cohort study and did not lower the risk of stroke compared with non-treated regardless of apixaban dosage. Widespread use of NOACs in dialysis patients is limited by adequately sized RCTs. Available evidence suggests a potential for use of apixaban and rivaroxaban in reduced dose.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Dialysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Rivaroxaban and apixaban are the most widely used nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). This meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness and safety of both NOACs versus standard of care (SoC) in real-world practice.. Real-world evidence (RWE) studies were identified through a systematic literature review conducted between January 2012 and July 2020, using Embase, MEDLINE, and the websites of cardiological, hematological, and oncological associations. Eligible RWE studies recruited adult patients with deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism and presented a comparison between rivaroxaban and apixaban versus SoC, consisting either of vitamin K antagonists, heparins, or combinations thereof. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the comparison between NOACs and SoC were extracted from the relevant studies or estimated based on the reported binary data. The between-treatment contrasts were reported as HRs with associated 95% confidence intervals.. A total of 65 RWE studies were identified and considered relevant for the meta-analysis. Compared with SoC, both rivaroxaban and apixaban were associated with reduced risks of recurrent VTE and a lower rate of major bleeding events. Patients treated with rivaroxaban were at a lower risk of all-cause death compared with those receiving SoC (HR = 0.56 [0.39-0.80]), while evidence for apixaban from the identified studies was insufficient to demonstrate a statistically significant change in mortality (HR = 0.66 [0.30-1.47]).. This analysis indicates that in real-world practice, rivaroxaban and apixaban are associated with a lower risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding events compared with SoC. Survival benefit in patients treated with rivaroxaban was also observed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Thromboprophylaxis is the cornerstone strategy for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Data comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in APS patients remain contentious. We aim to review and analyse literature on the efficacy and safety of DOACs compared with VKAs in treating patients with APS. A literature search was performed from inception to 31 December 2021. Subgroups were analysed based on the risk stratification of APS profiles and different DOAC types. A total of nine studies with 1131 patients were included in the meta-analysis. High-risk APS patients (triple positive APS) who used DOACs displayed an increased risk of recurrent thrombosis [risk ratio = 3.65, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.49-8.93; I2  = 29%, P  = 0.005] compared with those taking VKAs. Similar risk of recurrent thrombosis or major bleeding was noted in low-risk APS patients (single or double antibody-positive) upon administering DOACs or VKAs. The utilization of Rivaroxaban was associated with a high risk of recurrent thromboses (RR = 2.63; 95% CI: 1.56-4.42; I2  = 0, P  = 0.0003), particularly recurrent arterial thromboses (RR = 4.52; 95% CI: 1.99-10.29; I2  = 0, P  = 0.18) in overall APS patients. Comparisons of the rate of recurrent thrombosis events and major bleeding events when using dabigatran or apixaban versus VKAs yielded no statistical differences. In the absence of contraindications, this meta-analysis suggests that VKAs remain the first-choice treatment for high-risk APS patients, with DOACs a more appropriate option for low-risk APS patients. Different DOACs may exhibit different levels of efficacy and safety for thromboprophylaxis in APS patients and require further exploration.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Knee arthroscopy (KA) is a routine orthopedic procedure recommended to repair cruciate ligaments and meniscus injuries and, in suitable cases, to assist the diagnosis of persistent knee pain. There is a small risk of thromboembolic events associated with KA. This systematic review aims to assess if pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions may reduce this risk. This is an update of an earlier Cochrane Review.. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of interventions - whether mechanical, pharmacological, or a combination of both - for thromboprophylaxis in adults undergoing KA.. We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 1 June 2021.. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs), blinded or unblinded, of all types of interventions used to prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in men and women aged 18 years and older undergoing KA.. We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were pulmonary embolism (PE), symptomatic DVT, asymptomatic DVT, and all-cause mortality. Our secondary outcomes were adverse effects, major bleeding, and minor bleeding. We used GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence.. We did not identify any new studies for this update. This review includes eight studies involving 3818 adults with no history of thromboembolic disease. Five studies compared daily subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) versus no prophylaxis; one study compared oral rivaroxaban 10 mg versus placebo; one study compared daily subcutaneous LMWH versus graduated compression stockings; and one study compared aspirin versus no prophylaxis. The incidence of PE in all studies combined was low, with seven cases in 3818 participants. There were no deaths in any of the intervention or control groups. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus no prophylaxis When compared with no prophylaxis, LMWH probably results in little to no difference in the incidence of PE in people undergoing KA (risk ratio [RR] 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49 to 6.65; 3 studies, 1820 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). LMWH may make little or no difference to the incidence of symptomatic DVT (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.03; 4 studies, 1848 participants; low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether LMWH reduces the risk of asymptomatic DVT (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.61; 2 studies, 369 participants; very low-certainty evidence). LMWH probably makes little or no difference to the risk of all adverse effects combined (RR 1.85, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.59; 5 studies, 1978 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), major bleeding (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.72; 1451 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), or minor bleeding (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.84 to 3.84; 5 studies, 1978 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Rivaroxaban versus placebo One study with 234 participants compared oral rivaroxaban 10 mg versus placebo. There were no cases of PE reported. Rivaroxaban probably led to little or no difference in symptomatic DVT (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.29; moderate-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether rivaroxaban reduces the risk of asymptomatic DVT because the certainty of the evidence is very low (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.01). The study only reported bleeding adverse effects. No major bleeds occurred in either group, and rivaroxaban probably made little or no difference to minor bleeding (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.19; moderate-certainty evidence). Aspirin versus no prophylaxis One study compared aspirin with no prophylaxis. There were no PE, DVT or asymptomatic events detected in either group. The study authors reported adverse effects including pain and swelling, but wit. There is a small risk that healthy adults undergoing KA will develop venous thromboembolism (PE or DVT). We found moderate- to low-certainty evidence of little or no benefit from LMWH, or rivaroxaban in reducing this small risk of PE or symptomatic DVT. The studies provided very low-certainty evidence that LMWH may reduce the risk of asymptomatic DVT compared to no prophylaxis, but it is uncertain how this directly relates to incidence of DVT or PE in healthy people undergoing KA. There is probably little or no difference in adverse effects (including major and minor bleeding), but data relating to these outcomes were limited by low numbers of events in the studies reporting these outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Arthroscopy; Aspirin; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Pain; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

High-quality evidence from trials directly comparing single antiplatelet therapies in symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) to dual antiplatelet therapies or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) plus low-dose rivaroxaban is lacking. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis on the effectiveness of all antithrombotic regimens studied in PAD.. A systematic search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleedings. Secondary endpoints were major adverse limb events (MALE) and acute limb ischaemia (ALI). For each outcome, a frequentist network meta-analysis was used to compare relative risks (RRs) between medication and ASA. ASA was the universal comparator since a majority of studies used ASA as in the reference group.. Twenty-four randomized controlled trials were identified including 48,759 patients. With regard to reducing MACE, clopidogrel [RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.93], ticagrelor (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97), ASA plus ticagrelor (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97), and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.93) were more effective than ASA, and equally effective to one another. As compared to ASA, major bleedings occurred more frequently with vitamin K antagonists, rivaroxaban, ASA plus vitamin K antagonists, and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban. All regimens were similar to ASA concerning MALE, while ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban was more effective in preventing ALI (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.80). Subgroup analysis in patients undergoing peripheral revascularization revealed that ≥ 3 months after intervention, evidence of benefit regarding clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and ASA plus ticagrelor was lacking, while ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban was more effective in preventing MACE (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97) and MALE (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97) compared to ASA. ASA plus clopidogrel was not superior to ASA in preventing MACE ≥ 3 months after revascularization. Evidence regarding antithrombotic treatment strategies within 3 months after a peripheral intervention was lacking.. Clopidogrel, ticagrelor, ASA plus ticagrelor, and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban are superior to ASA monotherapy and equally effective to one another in preventing MACE in PAD. Of these four therapies, only ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban provides a higher risk of major bleedings. More than 3 months after peripheral vascular intervention, ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban is superior in preventing MACE and MALE compared to ASA but again at the cost of a higher risk of bleeding, while other treatment regimens show non-superiority. Based on the current evidence, clopidogrel may be considered the antithrombotic therapy of choice for most PAD patients, while in patients who underwent a peripheral vascular intervention, ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban could be considered for the long-term (> 3 months) prevention of MACE and MALE.

Topics: Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Ticagrelor; Vitamin K

Obesity is an epidemic with rising prevalence, and obese patients are predisposed to comorbid conditions that increase risk for thromboembolic events. It is critical to identify safe and effective anticoagulation therapy for use in this population. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a preferred option for anticoagulation in patients of normal weight due to many benefits and equivalent safety and efficacy to their vitamin K antagonist counterparts. However, the safety and efficacy of DOACs in obese patients is not well understood. This review describes recent studies on the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy, and clinical outcomes of the DOACs apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban and dabigatran in obese patient populations. DOACs may be a beneficial alternative to vitamin K antagonist therapy in obese patient populations.. The incidence of obesity within the USA is on the rise, as is that of the medical conditions that often accompany it. These include conditions that can predispose individuals to forming clots in the blood, such as atrial fibrillation, which is a form of an abnormal heartbeat, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, which is caused by fat buildup around the liver. Therefore, it is important that we have effective medicines that can prevent clotting in an obese patient population. Direct oral anticoagulants are a new, preferred medication option for this, but it is unclear how safe or effective they are in obese people; there is some concern that because of increased body weight, individuals may not get enough medicine to effectively prevent clots from forming, which would ultimately put them at risk for clotting and serious adverse health outcomes such as stroke. This review describes recent studies on the use of the direct oral anticoagulants apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban and dabigatran in obese patients, and whether they are a safe and effective form of anticoagulation in this population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Cancer is a major risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) constitutes approximately 15-25% of all VTE cases. For decades, the standard treatment for CAT used to be daily subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Data on the safety and efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this population emerged only in recent years and specific DOACs were included into recent guidelines recommendations. In this narrative review of the literature, we reported the results of the phase III randomized controlled trials that evaluated the DOACs for the prevention and the acute treatment of CAT. For the acute phase treatment, the anti-Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) showed better efficacy than LMWH in preventing VTE recurrence; however, rivaroxaban and edoxaban were also associated with an increased risk of bleeding events. For primary prevention of CAT in ambulatory cancer patients starting chemotherapy, apixaban and rivaroxaban showed better efficacy than placebo but a trend towards higher bleeding rates. Recent guidelines suggest the DOACs for the treatment of CAT in selected cancer patients (eg, low bleeding risk, no luminal gastrointestinal or genitourinary malignancies, no interfering medications). The DOACs are also suggested for primary thromboprophylaxis in selected ambulatory cancer patients at high risk of VTE (eg, Khorana score ≥2 prior to starting new chemotherapy, low bleeding risk, no interfering medications).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban, for preventing and treating venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer is unclear.. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from the establishment to November 30, 2021. In the frequency-based network meta-analysis, the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was reported. The relative ranking probability of each group was generated based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).. We included 15 randomized controlled trials involving a total of 6162 patients. Apixaban reduced the risk of VTE compared with low-molecular heparin [OR = 0.53, 95% CI (0.32, 0.89)]. The efficacy of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: apixaban (SUCRA, 81.0), rivaroxaban (73.0), edoxaban (65.9), dabigatran (51.4), warfarin (30.8), and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (27.4). Edoxaban increased the risk of major bleeding compared with LMWH [OR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.04, 3.22)]. The safety of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: major bleeding-apixaban (SUCRA, 68.5), LMWH (55.1), rivaroxaban (53.0), warfarin (35.9), dabigatran (29.2), edoxaban (16.5) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding-LMWH (73.0), apixaban (57.8), edoxaban (45.8), rivaroxaban (35.3), and warfarin (10.8).. For preventing and treating VTE, in terms of VTE occurrence and major bleeding, apixaban had the lowest risk; in terms of clinically relevant non-major bleeding, LMWH had the lowest risk, followed by apixaban. Generally, apixaban is the most efficient and safest DOAC and presents better efficacy and relatively low bleeding risk among the VTE prevention and treatment drugs for patients with cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether tramadol intake increases the risk of bleeding in patients receiving oral anticoagulants.. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022327230. We searched PubMed and Embase up to 14 April 2022, and references and citations of included studies were screened. Comparative and non-comparative studies exploring bleeding complications among adult patients on oral anticoagulants and tramadol were included. Risk of bias was assessed using an adaptation of the Drug Interaction Probability Scale for case reports and case series and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for comparative studies. A meta-analysis was performed for the risk of serious bleeding (leading to hospitalisation or death) associated with tramadol in patients on vitamin K antagonists.. A total of 17 studies were included: 1 case series, 12 case reports, 2 case-control studies and 2 cohort studies. Most of the studies described tramadol-vitamin K antagonists' concomitant use; one case-control study also assessed dabigatran and rivaroxaban; one case report involved dabigatran. Among case reports/series, a total of 33 patients had a bleeding complication while using tramadol and an oral anticoagulant. The 4 comparative studies reported an increased bleeding risk during tramadol and vitamin K antagonist intake which was statistically significant in one study; the pooled risk ratio of serious bleeding was 2.68 [95% CI: 1.45 to 4.96; p < 0.001].. This systematic review confirms an association between tramadol use and risk of bleeding in patients on vitamin K antagonists. Evidence is too limited to assess whether this risk extends to patients on direct oral anticoagulants, and further studies are needed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Case-Control Studies; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Tramadol; Vitamin K

Chronic kidney disease is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with heightened risks of stroke/systemic embolisation and bleeding. In this review we outline the evidence for AF stroke prevention in kidney disease, identify current knowledge gaps, and give recommendations for anticoagulation at various stages of chronic kidney disease. Overall, anticoagulation is underused. Warfarin use becomes increasingly difficult with advancing kidney disease, with difficulty maintaining international normalised ratio (INR) in therapeutic range, increased risk of intracranial and fatal bleeding compared to non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and high rates of discontinuation. Similarly, the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran is not recommended as it is predominantly renally excreted with consequent increased plasma levels and bleeding risk with advanced kidney disease. The Factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban have less renal excretion (25-35%), modest increases in plasma levels with advancing kidney disease, and are the preferred first line choice for anticoagulation in moderate kidney disease based on strong evidence from randomised clinical trials (RCTs). In severe kidney disease there is a paucity of RCT data, but extrapolation of the pharmacokinetic and RCT data for moderate kidney disease, and observational studies, support the considered use of dose-adjusted Factor Xa inhibitors unless the bleeding risk is prohibitive. In Australia, apixaban is approved for creatinine clearance down to 25 mL/min, and rivaroxaban down to 15 mL/min. For end-stage kidney disease warfarin is the only agent approved, but we recommend against anticoagulation (except in selected cases) due to high bleeding risk, multiple co-morbidities, and questionable benefit.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Low-dose (LD) direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in adjunct to antiplatelet therapy, known as dual-pathway inhibition (DPI), have been tested to prevent ischaemic events in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the overall safety and efficacy of LD DOACs vs placebo on a background of antiplatelet therapy.. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LD DOAC (defined as a dosage below the lowest approved for stroke prevention) vs placebo among patients with CVD receiving single or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in at least 50% of the population and followed for at least 6 months, were included. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to overcome different follow-up durations across trials. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the primary safety endpoint major bleeding. A pre-specified subgroup analysis was performed for different DOAC-dose regimens. A total of 49 802 patients from 7 RCTs were included. Low-dose DOACs vs placebo were associated with significant reductions in MACE (IRR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.91, number needed to treat, NNT, 86) and myocardial infarction (IRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.95, NNT 355) and significant increases of major (IRR 2.05, 95% CI 1.50-2.80, number needed to harm, NNH, 89) or all bleeding (IRR 1.82, 95% CI 1.49-2.22, NNH 23). Cardiovascular death (IRR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.03, NNT 784), intracranial (IRR 1.18, 95% CI 0.71-1.96, NNH 1810), and fatal bleeding (IRR 1.13, 95% CI 0.76-1.69, NNH 3170) did not differ significantly between strategies. Non-significant reductions of all-cause death (IRR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80-1.01, NNT 821) and stroke (IRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.01, NNT 315) favoured LD DOACs. Meta-regression analyses showed a significant interaction between percentage of DAPT use and increased risk of major bleeding (P = 0.04), intracranial haemorrhage (P = 0.035), and stroke (P = 0.0003). Subgroup analysis of very LD DOAC, defined as ≤1/3 of the lowest approved dose for stroke prevention (i.e. rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily) seemed to mitigate the risk of bleeding without any trade-off in efficacy compared to other LD DOAC regimens.. In patients with CVD, LD DOAC vs placebo on a background of antiplatelet therapy, reduced ischaemic events at the expense of increased major and all bleeding, but without significantly increasing intracranial or fatal bleeds, while the reduction of cardiovascular or total mortality and stroke was not statistically significant. A DPI with very LD DOAC (i.e. rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily) appeared particularly advantageous, especially when combined with a single antiplatelet agent and used among patients at high ischaemic and low bleeding risk.. This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021232744).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cardiovascular Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The results of associations between new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and wound complications after total joint arthroplasty remain inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to make comparisons with low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) on the clinical outcomes of total wound complications, together with other efficacy and safety endpoints to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of NOACs.. This meta-analysis was conducted based on a published protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42019140841). We searched for available articles in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library through Jun 62 021. Random-effects meta-analyses, including subgroup analyses, were conducted to estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for specific doses of NOACs.. We retrieved 1683 studies, of which 20 were eligible for inclusion. We found that apixaban was associated with a lower incidence of total wound complications compared with LMWH (RR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.65-1.00), while dabigatran and rivaroxaban did not increase the risk of total wound complications. In addition, apixaban was associated with a reduction in the risk of major/clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events compared to LMWH (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.99), while rivaroxaban increased the risk for major/clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.02-1.50). Moreover, all 4 NOACs were associated with lower incidences of major venous thromboembolism compared with LMWH.. A lower risk of wound complications was detected for apixaban, while dabigatran and rivaroxaban did not increase the risk when compared with LMWH. The efficacy of 4 NOACs was broadly similar.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Limited data are available for the comparison between different non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on clinical outcomes. We aimed to provide evidence of different NOACs for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. Electronic databases were searched from inception through 22 March 2020 to identify eligible studies in which clinical outcomes (stroke, systemic embolism [SE], bleeding or death events) were directly compared between different NOACs.. 29 real-world studies enrolled more than 700,000 patients were included. Compared with dabigatran, apixaban had higher risk of death (OR 1.07), major bleeding (1.43), GI bleeding (1.64), ischaemic stroke and stroke/SE events (1.10); rivaroxaban had higher risk of death (1.28), major bleeding (1.24), GI bleeding (1.14) and ischaemic stroke (1.08). Compared with rivaroxaban, apixaban had lower risk of death (0.8), major bleeding (0.56) and ischaemic stroke events (0.71). Compared with edoxaban, rivaroxaban had higher risk of major bleeding (2.83), GI bleeding (5.18) and ischaemic stroke (2.28).. In view of the global burden of disease and the routine use of NOACs worldwide, the findings have immediate and important implications. Our data suggested that apixaban might be the priority choice in prevention of bleeding and stroke and dabigatran could be the priority choice in prevention of death events.. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA), Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019140553).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

Although direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) decrease the bleeding risk compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), DOACs might cause spontaneous hemothorax in very elderly patients, even at a very low dose. Interactions between drugs might increase the risk of bleeding. In this article, we report a case of a 95-year-old man who developed spontaneous hemothorax while taking rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily, 3 days after concomitant use of itraconazole. Rivaroxaban was discontinued, and thoracentesis was performed to drain grossly bloody pleural effusion. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of spontaneous hemothorax that might have been caused by concomitant low-dose rivaroxaban and azole anti-fungal agents. This case highlights the potential risk of spontaneous hemothorax in very elderly patients while taking rivaroxaban and azole anti-fungal agents simultaneously. Special attention should be paid to interactions between drugs that might increase the risk of bleeding. Drugs that have competing metabolic pathways should be avoided. Closer monitoring, including testing for anti-Xa and additional reassessment, should be considered in high-risk patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemothorax; Humans; Itraconazole; Male; Rivaroxaban

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus.. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from the establishment of databases up to 15 October 2019. Studies on efficacy and safety outcomes of rivaroxaban and warfarin were included. Efficacy and safety outcomes, including stroke, ischemic stroke, stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac events, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and major gastrointestinal bleeding were collected for meta-analysis.. Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban could significantly reduce stroke (risk ratio [RR] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.95; P = 0.01), ischemic stroke (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.87; P = 0.0004), stroke or systemic embolism (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.60-0.89; P = 0.002), myocardial infarction (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.56-0.82; P < 0.0001), and major adverse cardiac events (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.53-0.94; P = 0.02) in patients with AF and diabetes. Moreover, rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.65-0.96; P = 0.02), intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.39-0.69; P < 0.00001), and major gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.98; P = 0.04). Similar results were obtained in stratified meta-analysis of cohort studies.. Our study suggests a favorable risk-benefit profile of rivaroxaban, with superior efficacy and safety over warfarin in patients with AF and diabetes.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

To evaluate how treatment with DOACs for VTE affects thrombosis and bleeding outcomes compared to warfarin in CKD and dialysis patients.. A literature search was conducted for studies evaluating VTE and bleeding outcomes with DOAC use in CKD and dialysis patients. Searches conducted through EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception to September 22, 2020.. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series with ≥10 patients included.. From 7286 studies, nine studies met inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference between DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) and warfarin for reducing recurrent VTE and bleeding events in moderate CKD patients. The risk of overall major bleeding increased when the degree of kidney impairment increased. There was no significant difference between apixaban and warfarin for VTE outcomes in dialysis patients.. There continues to be a controversial debate whether it may be more beneficial to use DOACs versus warfarin in CKD/dialysis patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). The risk vs benefit of using DOACs in the CKD/ESKD population should continue to be evaluated for each individual patient.. Apixaban may be used cautiously as an alternative in acute VTE treatment in severe CKD patients. Insufficient evidence is available to suggest the use of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in this patient population. The benefit of using DOACs in this population for VTE treatment should be weighed against the potential bleeding risk in patients with CKD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

To summarize the literature assessing the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the acute treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in select patients with hypercoagulable disorders.. An electronic PubMed literature search was conducted from January 2010 to July 2020 using the following keywords:. Articles were included if they reported clinical outcomes associated with cancer-associated VTE, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and other hereditary thrombophilias.. The safety and efficacy of using a DOAC is highly dependent on the type of hypercoagulable disease state. Current trials support the use of edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), with apixaban being preferred because of lower bleeding rates compared with standard of care. The use of DOACs, especially rivaroxaban, have been associated with worse outcomes in patients with APS, whereas data on DOAC use in hereditary thrombophilia remains scarce and limited to low-risk patients.. This review evaluates the literature assessing the safety and efficacy of DOACs in patients with various hypercoagulable disorders.. The current body of evidence supports the use of select DOACs for the treatment of CAT. In contrast, DOAC use in patients with APS and hereditary thrombophilia should be avoided at this time.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Thrombophilia; Venous Thromboembolism

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have similar half-lives, but the dosing regimen varies between once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID). For some prescribers, the QD regimen improves compliance. Others prefer BID regimens to promote better stability of plasma concentrations, particularly in the event of missed doses. Limited level of evidence provides guidance about the best treatment strategy. The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment effect of QD vs. BID administration of DOACs in major orthopedic surgery (MOS), non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), venous thromboembolism (VTE), and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. We conducted a systematic review up to April 2020. We included phase II clinical trials comparing DOAC QD vs BID with same daily dose. We extracted data for the occurrence of major thrombosis (proximal deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke) and major hemorrhage (ISTH criteria and recommendations of the European Medicines Agency for surgical patients). Relative risks (RR) were combined using a fixed and random effects weighted meta-analysis.. Our study does not support a global difference in term of efficacy and safety of the BID and QD regimens of DOAC in MOS, NVAF, VTE and ACS.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Although the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration have, respectively, approved rivaroxaban for the prevention of recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with myocardial infarction and stable coronary artery disease, its efficacy and safety is unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the benefit and risk of adding rivaroxaban in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, focusing on treatment effects stratified by different baseline clinical presentations.. There are differences in treatment effects of adding rivaroxaban among CAD patients with different baseline clinical presentations.. Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases were systematically searched from inception to 21 July 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rivaroxaban in CAD patients. The primary efficacy endpoint and safety endpoint were assessed by using Mantel-Haenszel pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. Five RCTs that included 43 650 patients were identified. Patients receiving rivaroxaban had a significantly lower risk of the primary efficacy endpoint (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.97, p = .01) accompanied by increased risk of the primary safety endpoint (RR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.10-3.05, p = .02). Subgroup analyses showed that in males the risk-benefit appears to be more favorable while in patients ≥65 years, in females, in patients with diabetes, those with mild to moderate impaired renal function, and region of Asia/other seems unfavorable.. Rivaroxaban may provide an additional choice for secondary prevention in CAD patients. However, careful estimation of the risk of ischemic and bleeding events using patient characteristics are critical to achieving net benefit.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Diseases; Heart Ventricles; Hemorrhage; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and as prophylaxis after hip and knee surgery after approval by the Food and Drug Administration. In the last decade, DOACs were studied for various indications; this review is focused on rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, which is used in an expanded evidence-based fashion for coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, heart failure, malignancy, and prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis in acute medical illnesses.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Decision-Making; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Selection; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

Anticoagulant treatment in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) or on dialysis remains a matter of debate. The object of this study was to quantify the benefit-risk profiles of rivaroxaban or apixaban versus warfarin in AF patients with stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis.. A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar databases was performed for eligible studies that comparing the effect and safety of rivaroxaban or apixaban versus warfarin in AF patients with stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were abstracted, and then pooled using a random-effects model.. A total of seven studies, one post hoc analysis of RCT and six observational cohorts, were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with warfarin use, the use of rivaroxaban or apixaban was significantly associated with reduced risks of all-cause death (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.93) and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95). There were no significant differences in the risks of stroke or systemic embolism (rivaroxaban, HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.43-1.19; apixaban, HR = 0.86, 95%CI 0.68-1.09) and major bleeding (rivaroxaban, HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.64-1.45; apixaban, HR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.28-1.12).. Current evidence suggests that rivaroxaban or apixaban are safe and at least as effective as warfarin in patients with AF and stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Acuity; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Anticoagulants are essential in the prevention of venous thromboembolism. However, the effectiveness and safety of different anticoagulants have always been controversial. Therefore, we aimed to expand the sample of anticoagulant results and rank the efficacy and safety of 19 anticoagulants in the prevention of venous thromboembolism when total knee or total hip arthroplasty procedure is performed.. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials of adult patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty were conducted. The trials were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, in which anticoagulants were used as interventions randomized controlled trial. The incidence of venous embolism and bleeding are the key outcomes of assessing the efficacy of intervention drugs. We used the Physical Therapy Evidence Database (PEDro) to assess risk bias and used pairwise comparison and network meta-analysis with random effects to estimate the summary relative risk. The study has been registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020200747.. From the 4083 identified manuscripts, 45,067 participants from 53 randomized trials were included in the analysis and randomly assigned to 19 anticoagulants. With Enoxaparin as a control, Rivaroxaban (risk difference 0.07, 95 % credible interval 0.06 to 0.08), Edoxaban (RD 0.09, 95 % CrI 0.08 to 0.11), and Apixaban (RD 0.05, 95 % CrI 0.04 to 0.06) had the best effect in preventing VTE. However, in terms of comprehensive bleeding rate, Apixaban, Edoxaban, and Darexaban were the most effective and stable. Although effective in preventing VTE, bleeding remains relatively high in Rivaroxaban. Enoxaparin is low-molecular-weight heparin that is widely used in clinics, and although its overall efficacy is not the best, its efficacy and safety are very stable.. According to the available data, Apixaban, Edoxaban, and Darexaban are better than any anticoagulants in the prevention of VTE and bleeding during total knee or total hip arthroplasty. In our study, Fondaparinux, Eribaxaban, Dalteparin, Betrixaban, Bemiparin, Reviparin, Acenocoumarol, and Tinzaparin were scarce in the included studies, therefore, more evidence is needed to prove their efficacy and safety.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

This review describes and analyzes literature to provide recommendations for use of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis (EDT) in medically ill patients.. Guidelines recommend pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis for patients at increased thrombosis risk during hospitalization and recommend against extending thromboprophylaxis beyond hospitalization. Despite these recommendations, observational data demonstrate that venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk persists following hospital discharge. A MEDLINE literature search was performed to identify original research evaluating the safety and efficacy of EDT. Eight meta-analyses and 5 randomized controlled trials-each varying in the agents studied (enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and betrixaban)-were selected for inclusion. Collectively, the evaluated data demonstrates that EDT reduces the incidence of VTE at the expense of increasing the risk of major bleeding and without providing mortality reduction. Variations in enrollment criteria, differences in EDT strategies, and uncertainty regarding proper patient selection limit the applicability of EDT in practice. Rivaroxaban and betrixaban gained Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval on the basis of results of the APEX and MARINER trials and a post hoc analysis of the MAGELLEN trial results. Although a number of agents are FDA approved for use in EDT, clinicians must carefully weigh the risks vs benefits of EDT with these agents until studies demonstrate a more favorable risk-benefit profile.. Evidence to support EDT in medically ill patients is inconclusive and has highlighted the need for an individualized approach. The reviewed evidence supports guideline recommendations from both the American College of Chest Physicians and the American Society of Hematology that recommend against routine use of EDT in the majority of medically ill patients. Future studies are needed to optimize the risk-benefit profile of EDT and to ensure proper patient selection.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The increasing availability of real-world evidence (RWE) about safety and effectiveness of direct non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) offers the opportunity to better understand the clinical and economic implications of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The objective of this study was to compare the economic implications of DOACs and VKAs using data from real-world evidence in patients with AF.. A Markov model simulating the lifetime course of patients diagnosed with non-valvular AF was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DOACs (i.e., rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban) versus VKAs from the Italian National Health System (INHS) perspective. The model was made up of data from the literature and a meta-analysis of RWE on the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and all-cause mortality (ACM); direct costs included drug costs, costs for drug monitoring, and management of events from official national lists. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were used to assess the robustness of the results.. Results from the meta-analysis showed that apixaban had a high probability of being the most effective for stroke/SE, MB and ACM. Despite their higher acquisition costs, the cost-effectiveness analysis showed all DOACs involved a saving when compared with VKAs, with per-patient savings ranging between €4647 (rivaroxaban) to €6086 (apixaban). Moreover, all DOACs indicated a gain both in quality-adjusted life-years and life-years. According to PSA, findings related to apixaban were consistent, while for dabigatran and rivaroxaban PSA revealed a higher degree of uncertainty.. The beneficial effect of DOACs on containing events showed in RWE had the potential to offset drug-related costs, thus improving the sustainability of treatment for non-valvular AF in daily clinical practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is characterized by pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, has become a serious public concern. Notably, over half of the patients with VTE are over 70 years of age, but elderly patients are at high risk of anti-coagulation and bleeding, which increase with age. Moreover, risk factors and frailty also show a difference between elderly patients and ordinary patients diagnosed with VTE. Rivaroxaban is a direct inhibitor of activated factor Xa and has the advantage of predictable pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, no coagulation monitoring, and few drug interactions. As a first-line therapy for VTE, this drug is more advantageous than traditional therapy and exhibits good efficacy and safety for ordinary patients. However, the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in elderly patients have not been fully elucidated. This article reviewed the use of rivaroxaban in elderly patients, including drug interactions, monitoring, reversal agents of rivaroxaban, and the use of small dosages of rivaroxaban in elderly patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

A systematic literature review (guided by PRISMA) was performed through January 27, 2021 using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Key search term clusters included drug and weight-related concepts (overweight/obese, body mass index [BMI], waist circumference). DistillerSR was utilized to review and process search results. Studies met inclusion if they analyzed the risk of bleeding and/or thrombosis in patients with increased body mass (i.e., via BMI or other criteria) receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban. Clinical guidelines, case reports/series, pharmacokinetic/dynamic analyses, and commentaries were excluded. Bias was examined qualitatively across studies.. After duplicates were removed, the original search rendered 1822 abstracts and 200 full-texts for screening, ultimately providing a final set of 24 studies for qualitative review. Of these studies, 13 (54.2%) enabled comparisons between patients of increased versus normal body mass, while 11 (45.8%) reported outcomes only for patients of increased body mass. The working definition of 'increased body mass' varied amongst the studies, including 11 (45.8%) studies that utilized BMI, seven (29.2%) with a combination of BMI and body measurement, two (8.3%) that relied on body weight alone, and four (16.7%) that identified obesity-related ICD codes. All 13 comparative studies found similar or reduced rates of safety and efficacy outcomes with rivaroxaban and apixaban.. The literature reports similar or lower bleeding and thrombotic risk for rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients of increased body mass compared to patients of normal body mass. Future prospective controlled studies are needed to further define guidelines for use in this population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at increased risk of major adverse limb events (MALE). The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this context is evolving. To assess the efficacy and safety of DOAC combined with aspirin compared to the use of antiplatelet agents in patients with symptomatic lower extremity (LE) PAD. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases, in September 2020, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were designed to investigate the effect of DOACs in the treatment of PAD. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed targeting ischemic and bleeding events. Three randomized clinical trials were included, providing a total of 9533 patients, and 744 pooled MALE events (316 in DOAC plus aspirin and 428 in control). Only data on rivaroxaban and edoxaban were available. The use of DOAC plus aspirin in PAD patients significantly decreased the rate of MALE (pooled OR 0.70 [0.61-0.83], P < 0.001; I

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Lower Extremity; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban

People with chronic heart failure (HF) are at risk of thromboembolic events, including stroke, pulmonary embolism, and peripheral arterial embolism; coronary ischaemic events also contribute to the progression of HF. The use of long-term oral anticoagulation is established in certain populations, including people with HF and atrial fibrillation (AF), but there is wide variation in the indications and use of oral anticoagulation in the broader HF population.. To determine whether long-term oral anticoagulation reduces total deaths and stroke in people with heart failure in sinus rhythm.. We updated the searches in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase in March 2020. We screened reference lists of papers and abstracts from national and international cardiovascular meetings to identify unpublished studies. We contacted relevant authors to obtain further data. We did not apply any language restrictions.. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing oral anticoagulants with placebo or no treatment in adults with HF, with treatment duration of at least one month. We made inclusion decisions in duplicate, and resolved any disagreements between review authors by discussion, or a third party.. Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, and assessed the risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy by calculating odds ratio (OR), accompanied by the 95% confidence intervals (CI).. We identified three RCTs (5498 participants). One RCT compared warfarin, aspirin, and no antithrombotic therapy, the second compared warfarin with placebo in participants with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and the third compared rivaroxaban with placebo in participants with HF and coronary artery disease. We pooled data from the studies that compared warfarin with a placebo or no treatment. We are uncertain if there is an effect on all-cause death (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.18; 2 studies, 324 participants; low-certainty evidence); warfarin may increase the risk of major bleeding events (OR 5.98, 95% CI 1.71 to 20.93, NNTH 17). 2 studies, 324 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported stroke as an individual outcome. Rivaroxaban makes little to no difference to all-cause death compared with placebo (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.13; 1 study, 5022 participants; high-certainty evidence). Rivaroxaban probably reduces the risk of stroke compared to placebo (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95; NNTB 101; 1 study, 5022 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and probably increases the risk of major bleeding events (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.33; NNTH 79; 1 study, 5008 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).. Based on the three RCTs, there is no evidence that oral anticoagulant therapy modifies mortality in people with HF in sinus rhythm. The evidence is uncertain if warfarin has any effect on all-cause death compared to placebo or no treatment, but it may increase the risk of major bleeding events. There is no evidence of a difference in the effect of rivaroxaban on all-cause death compared to placebo. It probably reduces the risk of stroke, but probably increases the risk of major bleedings. The available evidence does not support the routine use of anticoagulation in people with HF who remain in sinus rhythm.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated; Chronic Disease; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Placebo Effect; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with PAD for the first time.. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted for PAD.. Three trials which contained 14873 patients were included for final meta-analysis. The results showed patients with rivaroxaban was associated with reduction in primary efficacy outcome (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90; p < 0.001). The RR was 0.85 (0.71 to 1.01) for patients with rivaroxaban alone and 0.81 (0.74 to 0.89) for those with rivaroxaban plus aspirin (p for heterogeneity between groups = 0.65). Patients with rivaroxaban showed a lower rate of acute limb ischemia (0.56; 0.47 to 0.66; p < 0.001). There was a trend toward a reduction in the rate of major amputation for vascular causes in the rivaroxaban arm (0.81; 0.63 to 1.03; p = 0.08). Compared with control, rivaroxaban therapy did not reduce the risks of myocardial infarction (0.87, 0.73 to 1.04, p = 0.12), ischemic stroke (0.85, CI 0.68 to 1.06, p = 0.15), death from cardiovascular causes (0.99, 0.85 to 1.15, p = 0.91) or death from any cause (1.00, 0.90 to 1.12, p = 0.98). Rivaroxaban therapy was associated with a 1.57-fold higher major bleeding rate as compared with those with aspirin or warfarin alone.. Overall, the risks of the primary efficacy outcomes or adverse limb events were significantly lower with rivaroxaban than with aspirin or warfarin alone in patients with PAD. It also points out the significant major bleeding that occur because of such therapies.

Topics: Aged; Amputation, Surgical; Disease Progression; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Limb Salvage; Male; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Despite vitamin K antagonists (VKA) being the gold standard in the prevention of thromboembolic events in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants/direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used off-label.. We aimed to perform a systematic review comparing DOACs to VKA regarding prevention of thromboembolic events, occurrence of bleeding events and mortality in patients with APS.. An electronic database search was performed through MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Web of Science. After data extraction, we pooled the results using risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I². The outcomes considered were all thromboembolic events as primary, and major bleeding, all bleeding events and mortality as secondary. Evidence confidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology.. We included 7 studies and a total of 835 patients for analyses. Thromboembolic events were significantly increased in DOACs arm, compared with VKA-RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.62, I²-24%, n=719, 6 studies. In studies using exclusively rivaroxaban, which was the most representative drug in all included studies, the thromboembolic risk was increased threefold (RR 3.36, 95% CI 1.53 to 7.37). The risks of major bleeding, all bleeding events and mortality were not significantly different from control arm. The grade of certainty of our results is very low.. Current evidence suggests DOACs use, particularly rivaroxaban, among patients with APS, is less effective than VKA since it is associated with 69% increased risk of thromboembolic events.. CRD42020216178.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lower Extremity; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

The optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with a long-term indication for anticoagulation and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to compare randomised trials' outcomes of these patients, focussing on dual versus triple antithrombotic and non vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K oral anticoagulants regimens.. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from January 1980 to March 2019 yielding 309 articles, and after careful screening, five randomized trials totalling 10 643 patients were included for analysis.. Dual antithrombotic regimens were associated with significantly less thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding [odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.71], with no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72-1.22) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.61-1.19). NOAC regimens had significantly lower TIMI major and minor bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78) and intracranial bleeding (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66), with similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.16) and all-cause mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.26).. Dual antithrombotic and NOAC regimens have reduced bleeding without compromising the risk of cardiovascular events or mortality, and should be preferred for patients with ACS or PCI also needing long-term anticoagulation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Warfarin

Major bleeding (especially intracranial hemorrhage) is the most feared adverse event observed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving oral anticoagulation. Clinical risk factor-based scores have modest ability to predict major or clinically relevant bleeds, and blood biomarkers are increasingly implemented to improve bleeding prognostication in patients with AF on life‑long anticoagulation. To improve the safety of anticoagulation in the era of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs, or direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs], including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), specific demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables should be considered. The current review summarizes practical challenges in the management of oral anticoagulation with emphasis on the risk assessment tools, elderly or underweight patients, cancer patients, impact of chronic kidney disease, liver cirrhosis, and thrombocytopenia in the context of bleeding risk in patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Stroke in patients with CKD and AF is frequent, and is usually more severe than in the absence of CKD. Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend oral anticoagulant therapy in order to reduce thromboembolic risk in AF patients in general, and also in the presence of CKD, excluding however stage 4 and dialysis (stage 5) patients. Warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists are still the most frequently used drugs in these settings, despite the high bleeding risk. In the United States, the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, especially apixaban, are here used off-label, despite the absence of strong evidences of efficacy and safety. Several clinical trials are ongoing, and further evidence is needed before non-vitamin K antagonists can be recommended in these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Diabetes Complications; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Off-Label Use; Prevalence; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Major bleeding (especially intracranial hemorrhage) is the most feared adverse event observed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving oral anticoagulation. Clinical risk factor-based scores have modest ability to predict major or clinically relevant bleeds, and blood biomarkers are increasingly implemented to improve bleeding prognostication in patients with AF on life‑long anticoagulation. To improve the safety of anticoagulation in the era of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs, or direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs], including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), specific demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables should be considered. The current review summarizes practical challenges in the management of oral anticoagulation with emphasis on the risk assessment tools, elderly or underweight patients, cancer patients, impact of chronic kidney disease, liver cirrhosis, and thrombocytopenia in the context of bleeding risk in patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Direct oral anticoagulants, anti-IIa or anti-Xa, are widely used in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic disease as well as in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants are characterized by a rapid onset of activity, a predictable response and a relatively wide therapeutic window. Nevertheless, theoretical drug interactions exist since direct oral anticoagulants are substrates of the transport protein P-glycoprotein and/or of isoforms of cytochromes P450 pathway. Direct oral anticoagulants do not have a marketing authorization for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis unlike low-molecular-weight heparins which remain the gold standard treatment today. However, recent studies have compared low-molecular-weight heparins to direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. Results of these studies showed a non-inferiority of direct oral anticoagulants in the prevention of recurrent thromboembolic events but at the cost of an increased hemorrhagic risk, in particular for patients with gastrointestinal and urogenital cancers. Thus, international guidelines, unlike French guidelines, integrate them in first line of the therapeutic strategy of cancer patients. We are certainly entering an era of personalized therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis, considering cancer type and also the theoretical risk of drug interactions with anti-cancer treatments or supportive care.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antineoplastic Agents; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasm Proteins; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Knee arthroscopy (KA) is a routine orthopedic procedure recommended to repair cruciate ligaments and meniscus injuries and in eligible patients, to assist the diagnosis of persistent knee pain. KA is associated with a small risk of thromboembolic events. This systematic review aims to assess if pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions may reduce this risk. This review is the second update of the review first published in 2007.. To assess the efficacy and safety of interventions, whether mechanical, pharmacological, or in combination, for thromboprophylaxis in adult patients undergoing KA.. For this update, the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registries, on 14 August 2019.. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs), whether blinded or not, of all types of interventions used to prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in males and females aged 18 years and older undergoing KA. There were no restrictions on language or publication status.. Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality with the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, and extracted data. A third author addressed discrepancies. We contacted study authors for additional information when required. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.. This update adds four new studies, bringing the total of included studies to eight and involving 3818 adult participants with no history of thromboembolic disease undergoing KA. Studies compared daily subcutaneous (sc) low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) versus control (five studies); oral rivaroxaban 10 mg versus placebo (one study); daily sc LMWH versus graduated compression stockings (GCS) (one study); and aspirin versus control (one study). The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in all trials combined was low, with seven cases in 3818 participants.There were no deaths in any of the intervention or control groups. LMWH versus control When compared with control, LMWH probably results in little to no difference in the incidence of PE in patients undergoing KA (risk ratio (RR) 1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 6.65; 1820 participants; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). LMWH showed no reduction of the incidence of symptomatic DVT (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.03; 1848 participants; 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). LMWH may reduce the risk of asymptomatic DVT but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.61; 369 participants; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of an increased risk of all adverse events combined (RR 1.85, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.59; 1978 participants; 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). No evidence of a clear effect on major bleeding (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.72; 1451 participants; 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence), or minor bleeding was observed (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.84 to 3.84; 1978 participants; 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Rivaroxaban versus placebo One study with 234 participants compared oral rivaroxaban 10 mg versus placebo. No evidence of a clear impact on the risk of PE (no events in either group), symptomatic DVT (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.29; moderate-certainty evidence); or asymptomatic DVT (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.01; very low-certainty evidence) was detected. Only bleeding adverse events were reported. No major bleeds occurred in either group and there was no evidence of differences in minor bleeding between the groups (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.19; moderate-certainty evidence). Aspirin versus control One study compared aspirin with control. No PE, DVT or asymptomatic events were detected in either group. Adverse events including pain and swelling were reported but it was not clear what groups these were in. No bleeds were reported. LMWH versus GC. There is a small risk that healthy adult patients undergoing KA will develop venous thromboembolism (PE or DVT). There is moderate- to low-certainty evidence of no benefit from the use of LMWH, aspirin or rivaroxaban in reducing this small risk of PE or symptomatic DVT. There is very low-certainty evidence that LMWH use may reduce the risk of asymptomatic DVT when compared to no treatment but it is uncertain how this directly relates to incidence of DVT or PE in healthy patients. No evidence of differences in adverse events (including major and minor bleeding) was seen, but data relating to this were limited due to low numbers of events in the studies reporting within the comparisons.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Arthroscopy; Aspirin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Knee Joint; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stockings, Compression; Venous Thrombosis

Four direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Limited efficacy and safety data are available for their use in older adults (aged ≥75 years).. Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, EBSCO, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases were searched for trials comparing DOACs with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the treatment of VTE in older adults from inception through January 1, 2020. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the combined endpoint of recurrent VTE and related deaths and bleeding events (composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding). The Mantel-Haenszel relative risk (RR) random effects model was used to pool results across studies.. Six randomized controlled trials at low risk of bias met criteria for inclusion with a total of 3,665 patients aged 75 years and older with follow-up of 24 weeks or longer. Data for bleeding events were not available for dabigatran. Overall, DOACs had an improved efficacy over VKAs (RR = .56; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .38-.82). There was no statistically significant difference in the safety outcomes (RR = .77; 95% CI = .56-1.05). No significant heterogeneity was observed for efficacy outcome, and only moderate heterogeneity was observed for safety outcome.. In older adults with VTE, DOACs appear to improve rates of recurrent VTE and VTE-related deaths compared with VKAs with similar bleeding outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Funding for this summary was contributed by Arnold Ventures, Commonwealth Fund, California Health Care Foundation, National Institute for Health Care Management (NIHCM), New England States Consortium Systems Organization, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, and Partners HealthCare to the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), an independent organization that evaluates the evidence on the value of health care interventions. ICER's annual policy summit is supported by dues from Aetna, America's Health Insurance Plans, Anthem, Allergan, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Blue Shield of CA, Cambia Health Services, CVS, Editas, Express Scripts, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Harvard Pilgrim, Health Care Service Corporation, Health Partners, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), Kaiser Permanente, LEO Pharma, Mallinckrodt, Merck, Novartis, National Pharmaceutical Council, Premera, Prime Therapeutics, Regeneron, Sanofi, Spark Therapeutics, and United Healthcare. Pearson is employed by ICER; Synnott was employed by ICER at the time of this report. Ollendorf, Campbell, and McQueen received grants from ICER for work on this review. Ollendorf also reports advisory board, consulting, and other fees from Sarepta Therapeutics, DBV Technologies, EMD Serono, Gerson Lehman Group, The CEA Registry Sponsors, Autolus, Analysis Group, Amgen, AbbVie, Cytokinetics, Aspen Institute/University of Southern California, and University of Colorado, unrelated to this review.

Topics: Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eicosapentaenoic Acid; Hemorrhage; Humans; Models, Economic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Decisions surrounding periprocedural anticoagulation management must balance thromboembolic and procedural bleed risk. The interruption of both warfarin and DOACs requires consideration of anticoagulant pharmacokinetics, procedural bleed risk and patient characteristics. There is a diminishing role for periprocedural bridging LMWH overall and no role for bridging LMWH for the procedural interruption of DOACs. A clinical approach to perioperative DOAC management based on operative bleeding risk and renal function is safe and effective, and at present, is preferred over preprocedural DOAC levels testing. Clear communication of the anticoagulation interruption plan to both the patient and the patient's care team is essential.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Warfarin

Despite advances in secondary prevention strategies in patients with cardiovascular disease, the residual risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events remains high. Dual-antiplatelet therapy is the standard of care for secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), whereas single antiplatelet therapy, generally with aspirin, is the standard of care for secondary prevention in stable patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral artery disease (PAD), or cerebrovascular disease. However, atherosclerotic plaque disruption not only triggers platelet activation but also results in thrombin generation because of tissue factor exposure. Therefore, blocking both pathways by combining antiplatelet therapy with an anticoagulant, or dual pathway inhibition (DPI), has the potential to be more effective than inhibiting either pathway alone. The benefit of DPI has been demonstrated in the ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51, COMPASS, and VOYAGER PAD trials, where the combination of rivaroxaban vascular dose (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin significantly reduced the risk of atherothrombotic events compared with aspirin across a broad range of patients, including those with recent ACS, those with chronic CAD and/or PAD, and patients with PAD who have undergone peripheral revascularization. This article provides the rationale for this regimen in more detail, including why the DPI regimen with the rivaroxaban vascular dose was developed for vascular protection in a broad spectrum of patients with atherosclerotic disease.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Forecasting; Hemorrhage; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thrombin

Given the huge burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and AF-related stroke in Asia, stroke prevention represents an urgent issue in this region. We herein performed a network meta-analysis to examine the role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in Asian patients with AF.. A systematic search of the publications was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases for eligible studies until July 2019. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were regarded as the effect estimates. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) for the ranking probabilities was calculated.. A total of 17 studies were included. For comparisons of NOACs vs warfarin, dabigatran (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.86), rivaroxaban (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.81), apixaban (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.49-0.65), but not edoxaban reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, wheres dabigatran (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.76), rivaroxaban (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.86), apixaban (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66), and edoxaban (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.24-0.49) decreased the risk of major bleeding. In reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, apixaban and rivaroxaban ranked the best and second best (SUCRA 0.2% and 31.4%, respectively), followed by dabigatran (50.2%), edoxaban (75.2%), and warfarin (93.0%). In reducing the risk of major bleeding, edoxaban, and apixaban ranked the best and second best (1.5% and 30.8%, respectively), followed by dabigatran (48.4%), rivaroxaban (69.2%), and warfarin (100%).. NOACs were at least as effective as warfarin, but more safer in Asians with AF. Apixaban was superior to other NOACs for reducing stroke or systemic embolism, while edoxaban showed a better safety profile than other NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Asia; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost of Illness; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Safety; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in adults in western nations. In the last decades, tremendous research has been conducted in the field of secondary prevention in order to reduce recurrent cardiovascular events. This review summarizes the novel dual pathway concept of aspirin and very low-dose rivaroxaban, from mechanisms to clinical practice.. The COMPASS trial demonstrated that in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease, very low-dose rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, when combined with aspirin, reduced the rate of recurrent ischemic events, at the cost of increased bleeding. This effect was present in patients with ischemic heart disease, as well as in patients with atherosclerosis in other beds, such as in peripheral arterial disease. Sub-studies from the COMPASS trial examined other high-risk populations who might benefit the most from this regimen.. There are currently multiple antiplatelet and anticoagulation treatment regimens for patients with stable atherosclerotic disease. The dual pathway concept is a novel approach that combines both mechanisms. Identifying patients who might benefit the most in terms of ischemic events at the least bleeding events still remains a challenge, yet prescribing this combination to high-risk patients might be the most effective.

Topics: Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention

There are many anticoagulant test indexes available for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but how to select the appropriate index and the index cutoff values are still controversial. This is the first study, to our knowledge, to assess the association of different coagulation indicators with clinical outcomes among DOACs using a meta-analysis of observational studies.. A medical literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2020. Studies that reported relationships between coagulation indexes and clinical outcomes or the diagnostic value of coagulation assays were included in the analysis.. A total of 17 articles (7 meta-analyses and 10 systematic reviews) from 8904 citations were included in the analysis. In the analysis of bleeding events with coagulation indexes for DOACs, for peak prothrombin time level (cutoff value of 19-25 s), the pooled results found a sensitivity of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.44-0.75) and a specificity of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.49-0.86). For rivaroxaban, the trough anti-factor Xa concentration (AXA-C) (cutoff value of 400-500 ng/mL) had a sensitivity of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.16-0.87) and a specificity of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.71-0.94), with a diagnostic odds ratio of 7 (95% CI, 2-32). For apixaban, trough AXA-C had a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.60-0.96) and a specificity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.52-0.95). The AUC of the AXA-C peak was higher than that of the trough AXA-C for apixaban, with a higher sensitivity and specificity. Compared with trough concentration of anti-factor IIa for dabigatran, the peak concentration had a higher specificity (98%) at the cutoff value of 484 ng/mL. In the analysis of thromboembolic events with coagulation indexes for DOACs, peak and trough prothrombin time values were not typically correlated with subsequent symptomatic venous thromboembolism, without a sensitivity or specificity higher than 90%. Trough AXA-C had a sensitivity of 100% and but a low specificity (<50%) for rivaroxaban-apixaban. Trough AXA-C had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 32% with a cutoff value of 108 ng/mL for dabigatran.. Peak prothrombin time (19-25 s) and AXA-C had a better predictive value on bleeding outcomes for rivaroxaban and apixaban, whereas peak concentration of anti-factor IIa activity can be an indicator for dabigatran. Coagulation indexes might not be a good indicator of thromboembolic events of DOACs. Because the limited studies focused on association of coagulation indicators and clinical outcomes, more studies are needed to verify this in the future.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prothrombin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Obesity, Morbid; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial or venous thrombosis (or both), and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. The prevalence of APS is estimated at 40 to 50 cases per 100,000 people. The most common sites of thrombosis are cerebral arteries and deep veins of the lower limbs. People with a definite APS diagnosis have an increased lifetime risk of recurrent thrombotic events.. To assess the effects of antiplatelet (AP) or anticoagulant agents, or both, for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis, particularly ischemic stroke, in people with APS.. We last searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, and ongoing trials registers on 22 November 2019. We checked reference lists of included studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines. We also contacted experts in the field.. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated any anticoagulant or AP agent, or both, in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in people with APS, according to the criteria valid when the study took place. We did not include studies specifically addressing women with obstetrical APS.. Pairs of review authors independently worked on each step of the review, following Cochrane methods. We summarized the evidence using the GRADE approach.. We identified eight studies including 811 participants that compared different AP or anticoagulant agents. NOAC (non-VKA oral anticoagulant: rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg/d) versus standard-dose VKA (vitamin K antagonist: warfarin at moderate International Normalized Ratio [INR] - 2.5) or adjusted [INR 2.0-3.0] dose): In three studies there were no differences in any thromboembolic event (including death) and major bleeding (moderate-certainty evidence), but an increased risk of stroke (risk ratio [RR] 14.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.87 to 106.8; moderate-certainty evidence). One of the studies reported a small benefit of rivaroxaban in terms of quality of life at 180 days measured as health state on Visual Analogue Scale (mean difference [MD] 7 mm, 95% CI 2.01 to 11.99; low-certainty evidence), but not measured as health utility on a scale from 0 to 1 (MD 0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.10; low-certainty evidence). High-dose VKA (warfarin with a target INR of 3.1 to 4.0 [mean 3.3] or 3.5 [mean 3.2]) versus standard-dose VKA (warfarin with a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 [mean 2.3] or 2.5 [mean 2.5]): In two studies there were no differences in the rates of thrombotic events and major bleeding (RR 2.22, 95% CI 0.79 to 6.23, low-certainty evidence), but an increased risk of minor bleeding in one study during a mean of 3.4 years (standard deviation [SD] 1.2) of follow-up (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.07 to 6.07). In both trials there was evidence of a higher risk of any bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03 95% CI 1.12 to 3.68; low-certainty evidence) in the high-dose VKA group, and for this outcome (any bleeding) the incidence is not different, only the time to event is showing an effect. Standard-dose VKA plus a single AP agent (warfarin at a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 plus aspirin 100 mg/d) versus standard-dose VKA (warfarin at a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0): One high-risk-of-bias study showed an increased risk of any thromboembolic event with combined treatment (RR 2.14, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.43; low-certainty evidence) and reported on major bleeding with five cases in the combined treatment group and one case in the standard-dose VKA treatment group, resulting in RR 7.42 (95% CI 0.91 to 60.7; low-certainty evidence) and no differences for secondary outcomes (very low- to low-certainty evidence). Single/dual AP agent and standard-dose VKA (pooled results): Two high-risk-of-bias studies compared a combination of AP and VKA (aspirin 100 mg/d plus warfarin or unspecified VKA at a target INR of. The evidence identified indicates that NOACs compared with standard-dose VKAs may increase the risk of stroke and do not appear to alter the risk of other outcomes (moderate-certainty evidence). Using high-dose VKA versus standard-dose VKA did not alter the risk of any thromboembolic event or major bleeding but may increase the risk of any form of bleeding (low-certainty evidence). Standard-dose VKA combined with an AP agent compared with standard-dose VKA alone may increase the risk of any thromboembolic event and does not appear to alter the risk of major bleeding or other outcomes (low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the benefit or harm of using standard-dose VKA plus AP agents versus single or dual AP therapy, or dual versus single AP therapy, for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis in people with APS (very low-certainty evidence).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Cause of Death; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are a widely prescribed treatment to prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and a therapy and preventative measure to prevent recurrences following venous thromboembolism. Optimal use of NOACs requires a thorough knowledge of the pharmacology of these drugs, as well as an understanding of patient factors affecting their use. The 4 NOACs-dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are available in a range of doses suitable for differing indications and with a variety of dose reduction criteria. Identification of the correct dose is one of the key challenges in the individualization of treatment. Elderly patients with atrial fibrillation are at a greater risk of both ischemic and bleeding events than younger patients. Consequently, it is essential to achieve balance in anticoagulation strategies. Medication adherence to NOACs is important for safe and effective treatment, particularly in elderly populations. A growing body of evidence shows that once-daily dosing improves adherence and persistence to therapy, without having an impact on bleeding risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Medication Adherence; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Currently licenced direct oral anticoagulants selectively target thrombin (eg, dabigatran) or coagulation factor Xa (eg, apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban). Designed to be given in fixed doses without routine monitoring, direct oral anticoagulants have a lower propensity for food and drug interactions than do vitamin K antagonists, and in randomised controlled trials involving around 250 000 patients, they were at least as effective for prevention and treatment of thrombosis and were associated with a lower risk of life-threatening bleeding. The absolute benefits of direct oral anticoagulants over vitamin K antagonists are modest; however, guidelines recommend them in preference to vitamin K antagonists for most indications because of their ease of use and superior safety. The greatest benefits of direct oral anticoagulants are likely to be in patients who were previously deemed unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist therapy. The emergence of generic preparations is expected to further increase the uptake of direct oral anticoagulants, particularly in countries where they are currently not widely used because of cost. Direct oral anticoagulants are contraindicated in patients with mechanical heart valves and should be used with caution or avoided in patients with advanced kidney or liver disease. In this Therapeutics paper, we review the pharmacology of direct oral anticoagulants, summarise the evidence that led to their approval and incorporation into treatment guidelines, and explore key unresolved issues. We also briefly discuss future perspectives for the development of oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are currently recommended for oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In the setting, NOACs effectively prevent from stroke and systemic embolic events. In spite of the favorable safety profile of NOACs when compared with vitamin K antagonists, the use of any kind of anticoagulation is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. However, there is still a lack of direct comparisons of effectiveness and safety among NOACs. The results of indirect comparisons and meta-analyses suggest that the risk of various types of hemorrhagic complications differ among the particular NOACs. Management of bleeding in patients under NOAC therapy can be challenging because of limited availability of antidotes and the lack of routine laboratory test monitoring the NOAC anticoagulant effect. In case of life-threatening or critical site bleeding, reversal of NOAC anticoagulant activity is essential together with immediate implementation of causative treatment. Moreover, some patients on chronic NOAC therapy may require urgent surgery or invasive procedures. Specific reversal agents for NOACs have been developed, i.e. more widely available idarucizumab for the factor IIa inhibitor (dabigatran) and andexanet alfa for the factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) with limited availability. This review summarizes the occurrence and management of NOAC-related bleeding complications with a particular emphasis on hematuria.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hematuria; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Andexanet alfa is the newly approved factor Xa inhibitor reversal agent for the treatment of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding from apixaban or rivaroxaban. This decoy protein directly binds factor Xa inhibitors reversing their action. A systematic and evidence-based evaluation of the available clinical trials is lacking in the literature. This research will provide a systematic and evidence-based evaluation of published clinical trials for andexanet alfa. It will also present an evaluation of active research. Reports of research were identified through multiple databases using search terms andexanet alfa, andexanet, or PRT064445. The level of evidence and strength of recommendation were accomplished using the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy. There are 2 published articles presenting 3 clinical trials. Two trials had a low level of evidence and the third trial, a preliminary report of results, showed a moderate level of evidence. The review of active research found 3 unique studies and a preliminary results study. The level of evidence is low for 2 of these studies, moderate for a third, and potentially high for the fourth. The strength of recommendation for all 6 studies is a C. Four of the studies present disease-oriented evidence resulting in a low level of evidence. Another study is unblinded and uncontrolled but presents patient-oriented evidence resulting in a moderate level of evidence. Only one study could score high because the outcome is patient-oriented evidence, and it could achieve follow-up of 80%. There is a need for well-controlled and blinded evaluation to improve the recommendation strength.

Topics: Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban

The risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) persists after interruption of the initial anticoagulation therapy. New evidence shows that direct oral anticoagulants are effective for extended treatment of VTE and may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. The optimal duration of anticoagulation after VTE is, however, controversial and complicated by the need for individualised assessment and balance between thrombosis and bleeding risks. Three direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran) have been studied for extended treatment of VTE. Dabigatran was shown to be safer than vitamin K antagonists and similarly effective for the prevention of recurrent VTE. Dabigatran, apixaban and rivaroxaban resulted in significant decreases in the rate of recurrent symptomatic VTE when compared to placebo, without a statistically significant difference in the risk of major bleeding. The latest guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians suggest the use of low-dose aspirin to prevent VTE recurrence in patients who want to stop anticoagulation. In the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 EINSTEIN CHOICE trial, once-daily rivaroxaban at doses of 20 mg or 10 mg and 100 mg of aspirin were compared in VTE patients for whom there was clinical equipoise for extended anticoagulation. Either a treatment dose (20 mg) or a prophylactic dose (10 mg) of rivaroxaban significantly reduced the risk of VTE recurrence without a significant increase in bleeding risk compared with aspirin. The EINSTEIN CHOICE trial included patients with provoked or unprovoked VTE. Patients with VTE provoked by minor persistent or minor transient risk factors enrolled in this trial had not-negligible VTE recurrence rates. These new findings on extended therapy suggest the possibility of anticoagulation regimens at intensities tailored to the patients' risk profiles and VTE characteristics, with a shift of the risk-benefit balance in favour of extended treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Dabigatran; Glycosaminoglycans; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Both apixaban and rivaroxaban have been approved for use in acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although indirect comparison through network meta-analyses of randomized trials have been performed to compare the efficacy and safety of these agents, further comparison between these agents was lacking until recently. We sought to systematically review and carry out a meta-analysis of studies to further compare apixaban with rivaroxaban from multiple studies done in the real-world settings. Studies comparing rivaroxaban with apixaban in patients with acute VTE were identified through electronic literature searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane library up to May 2019. Study-specific risk ratios (RRs) were calculated and combined using a random-effects model meta-analysis. In an analysis involving 24 041 patients, recurrent VTE within 6 months occurred in 56 of 4897 patients (1.14%) in the apixaban group and 258 of 19 144 patients (1.35%) in the rivaroxaban group (RR, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.19;

Topics: Blood Coagulation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

To assess the efficacy and safety of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in people undergoing elective total hip replacement.. Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials were conducted for 3 outcomes: deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and major bleeding (MB). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases were searched. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias checklist. Fixed- and random-effects models were fitted and compared. The median relative risk (RR) and odds ratio (OR) compared with no prophylaxis, with their 95% credible intervals (CrIs), rank, and probability of being the best, were calculated.. Forty-two (n = 24 374, 26 interventions), 30 (n = 28 842, 23 interventions), and 24 (n = 31 792, 15 interventions) randomized controlled trials were included in the DVT, PE, and MB networks, respectively. Rivaroxaban had the highest probability of being the most effective intervention for DVT (RR 0.06 [95% CrI 0.01-0.29]). Strategy of low-molecular-weight heparin followed by aspirin had the highest probability of reducing the risk of PE and MB (RR 0.0011 [95% CrI 0.00-0.096] and OR 0.37 [95% CrI 0.00-26.96], respectively). The ranking of efficacy estimates across the 3 networks, particularly PE and MB, had very wide CrIs, indicating high degree of uncertainty.. A strategy of low-molecular-weight heparin given for 10 days followed by aspirin for 28 days had the best benefit-risk balance, with the highest probability of being the best on the basis of the results of the PE and MB network meta-analyses. Nevertheless, there is considerable uncertainty around the median ranks of the interventions.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Aspirin; Bayes Theorem; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Elective Surgical Procedures; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Patient Preference; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Oral anticoagulants (OA) are effective drugs for treating and preventing the formation of blood clots in patients with atrial fibrillation, mechanical heart valves and venous thromboembolism but their therapeutic effect is always counterbalanced by an increased risk of bleeding. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have brought advantages in the management of many patients, with evidence of a lower risk of intracranial bleeding in comparison to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, due to the increased number of anticoagulated patients worldwide, major and life threatening OA-related bleeding is also increasing, and effective reversal strategies are needed. We reviewed the reversal strategies for both VKAs and DOACs in the light of the latest evidence and recent guidelines, taking into account non-specific methods with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or four factor PCC, as well as specific reversal antidotes that are already approved or in approval phase. Most published studies on OA reversal have drawbacks, such as lacking a control arm or data on clinically relevant outcomes, and current guidelines' recommendations are mainly based on panellists' judgment. There is an urgent need for well-designed studies in this field. In the meanwhile, to improve the correct use of available resources and patients' outcomes, we suggest a seven-element bundle for an optimal management of OA-associated major bleeding, including the implementation of fast turnaround time for laboratory tests in emergency, i.e. INR and DOAC plasma levels, and to build up a 'bleeding team' that includes experts of hemostasis, lab, trauma, emergency medicine, endoscopy, radiology, and surgery in every hospital.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa; Hemorrhage; Humans; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K

There is a lack of clear benefit and a potential risk of bleeding with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. The objective of this study was to evaluate how treatment with DOACs affects stroke and bleeding outcomes compared with warfarin or aspirin.. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and case series, and searched electronic databases from 1946 to 2017. Studies evaluating stroke and bleeding outcomes with DOAC use in CKD and dialysis patients were included.. From 8008 studies, 10 met the inclusion criteria. For moderate CKD patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate  <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), there was no difference in stroke outcomes between dabigatran 110 mg [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.51-1.21], rivaroxaban (HR 0.82-0.84, 95% CI 0.25-2.69) and edoxaban (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65-1.18) versus warfarin. Dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) and apixaban reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism significantly more than warfarin for moderate CKD patients (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.89 and HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94, respectively). Edoxaban and apixaban were associated with reduced major bleeding events (HR 0.50-0.76) compared with warfarin. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg showed no significant difference in major bleeding versus warfarin. In hemodialysis (HD) patients, there was no difference in stroke outcomes between apixaban, dabigatran [relative risk (RR) 1.71, 95% CI 0.97-2.99] or rivaroxaban (RR 1.8, 95% CI 0.89-3.64) versus warfarin. In HD patients, rivaroxaban and dabigatran were associated with an increased major bleeding risk (RR 1.45-1.76), whereas there was no major bleeding difference with apixaban compared to warfarin.. The heterogeneity of major bleeding and stroke definitions of the 10 included studies.. Clinicians should continue to weigh the risk of stroke versus bleeding before prescribing DOACs in the CKD and dialysis population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To assess the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation.. A systematic review was performed according to Cochrane methodological standards. The results were reported according to the PRISMA statement. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess risk of bias.. A total of 27 different studies publishing data in 30 publications were included. In the studies with a follow-up up to 1 year, apixaban (HR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.71-1.20) and dabigatran (HR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.80-1.13) did not significantly reduce the risk of ischemic stroke vs warfarin, whereas rivaroxaban significantly reduced this risk (HR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.73-0.94). Apixaban (HR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.55-0.80) and dabigatran (HR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.70-0.97) significantly reduced the major bleeding risk vs warfarin, but not rivaroxaban (HR, 1.02; 95%CI, 0.95-1.10), although with a high statistical heterogeneity among studies. Apixaban (HR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.42-0.73), dabigatran (HR, 0.45; 95%CI, 0.39-0.51), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.49-0.88) significantly reduced the risk of intracranial bleeding vs warfarin. Reduced doses of direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a slightly better safety profile, but with a marked reduction in stroke prevention effectiveness.. Data from this meta-analysis suggest that, vs warfarin, the stroke prevention effectiveness and bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants may differ in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Case-Control Studies; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been increasingly prescribed in clinical practice for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct comparisons between NOACs in trials are lacking, leaving an important clinical decision-making gap. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the evidence of observational studies for direct comparative effectiveness and safety amongst NOACs in patients with AF. Conference proceedings and electronic databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PUBMED were systematically searched. We included observational studies directly comparing individual NOACs in patients with nonvalvular AF who were aged ≥ 18 years for stroke prevention. Primary outcome included effectiveness outcome (stroke or systemic embolism) and safety outcome (major bleeding). Data were extracted in duplicated by two reviewers independently. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the data from included observational studies. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to rate the overall quality of evidence for each outcome. Fifteen studies were included for qualitative synthesis, twelve studies for meta-analyses. It was found that rivaroxaban and dabigatran were similar with regard to risk of stroke or systemic embolism (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.00, 95% CI 0.91-1.10; evidence quality: low), but rivaroxaban was associated with higher risk of major bleeding (HR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.28-1.50; evidence quality: moderate). Compared with apixaban, a significantly higher risk of major bleeding was observed with rivaroxaban (HR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.51-1.94; evidence quality: low). Apixaban was associated with lower risk of major bleeding, in comparison with dabigatran (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.95; evidence quality: low). No differences in risk of stroke or systemic embolism was observed between rivaroxaban versus apixaban, and apixaban versus dabigatran. In this study, apixaban was found to have the most favorable safety profile amongst the three NOACs. No significant difference was observed in risk of stroke or systemic embolism between the NOACs. Such findings may provide some decision-making support for physicians regarding their choices amongst NOACs in patients with AF.Registration PROSPERO (identifier: CRD42016052908).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

A recent survey on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) revealed that 43% of patients with atrial fibrillation and renal impairment were potentially overdosed and had a hazard ratio for major bleeding of 2.19. In this review, we analyse and discuss the effect of renal failure on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of DOACs and of strategies proposed to adjust doses according to the level of renal dysfunction. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of available DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, betrixaban) differ substantially as regards oral bioavailability, plasma protein binding and the relative involvement of renal and non-renal elimination. In this respect, 80% of dabigatran is excreted as an unchanged drug in urine, whereas edoxaban, rivaroxaban, apixaban and betrixiban are excreted unchanged by, respectively, 50, 33, 27 and 11% of the dose. Therefore, drug exposure (the area under the concentration-time curve, AUC) is expected to increase to differing extents, depending on the residual renal function and the contribution of the kidneys to the excretion of each drug. Our analysis found that the increased AUC in patients with severe renal dysfunction was greater than expected in the case of dabigatran, betrixaban and rivaroxaban, indicating that other pharmacokinetic parameters may be altered besides renal clearance. Although DAOC pharmacodynamics do not seem to be altered by renal diseases (the correlation between plasma levels and anticoagulant effects overlaps that of healthy subjects), renal failure per se is associated with an increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolism. Guidelines on dose adjustments in patients with renal dysfunction have been published by three National Drug Agencies (FDA, EMA, HC), but many of their items do not match one another, reflecting our substantial paucity of knowledge in advanced renal failure. Routine monitoring of DOAC anticoagulant effects or plasma concentrations is not recommended, since no validated therapeutic ranges have been established. However, this approach may be useful in emergency situations such as bleeding or thrombotic events, urgent surgery, pharmacokinetic interactions, etc. We conclude that more experimental work is needed to improve our knowledge of DOAC pharmacology in renal failure and to provide clinicians with valid tools to adjust therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban

Four non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been evaluated in clinical trials for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although each of the NOACs have been shown to be at least non-inferior to warfarin for efficacy and safety outcomes, controversy remains over the relative safety of each NOAC inpatient subgroups. This narrative review provides an overview of phase III data on NOAC trials for the prevention of stroke in AF, with a focus on reporting the safety of each agent in key patient subgroups based on age, gender, accumulated risk factors, and primary or secondary prevention of stroke.. A comprehensive literature search was completed and, where data permit, analyses of phase III trials of the NOACs are presented for each patient subgroup.. Analyses of key safety outcomes from NOAC trials were completed using primary trial data, including major bleeding and all-cause mortality. The safety of NOACs was generally consistent and favourable compared with warfarin according to patient age, gender, previous history of stroke, and the presence of risk factors for stroke.. The safety of the NOACs compared with warfarin was generally favourable across different patient subgroups, including those perceived to be at "high risk" for adverse outcomes. However, certain NOACs may be preferable to warfarin in some subgroups, based on indirect analyses.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases a patient's stroke risk four- to five-fold. Anticoagulation with the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by 67%, but warfarin carries a significant risk of major bleeding and has unpredictable pharmacodynamics with a narrow therapeutic window, necessitating frequent monitoring of its anticoagulant effect. The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban provide more predictable anticoagulant activity than warfarin with a lower risk of major bleeding, and each is noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke. All have earned regulatory approval in the past eight years. At least one of the NOACs is approved for use in all patients with AF, except those with mechanical valves and rheumatic mitral valve disease, for whom warfarin remains the only option. Recent clinical trials have shown that antithrombotic regimens including NOACs are safe and effective in patients with AF who need potent antiplatelet therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) require dose reductions according to patient or clinical factors for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess outcomes with reduced-dose NOACs when given as pre-specified in pivotal trials.. Aggregated data abstracted from Phase III trials comparing NOACs with warfarin in patients with AF were assessed by treatment using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) stratified by patient eligibility for NOAC dose reduction. Irrespective of treatments, annualized rates of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were higher in patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs than in those eligible for full-dose NOACs (2.70% vs. 1.60% and 4.35% vs. 2.87%, respectively). Effects of reduced-dose NOACs compared with warfarin in patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs on stroke or systemic embolism [RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.69-1.03)] and on major bleeding [RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.50-0.97)] were consistent with those of full-dose NOACs relative to warfarin in those eligible for full-dose NOACs [RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.96) for stroke or systemic embolism and RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.70-1.08) for major bleeding; interaction P, 0.89 and 0.26, respectively]. In addition, NOACs were associated with reduced risks of haemorrhagic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, fatal bleeding, and death regardless of patient eligibility for NOAC dose reduction (interaction P > 0.05 for each).. Patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs were at elevated risk of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications when treated with anticoagulants. NOACs, when appropriately dose-adjusted, had an improved benefit-harm profile compared with warfarin. Our findings highlight the importance of prescribing reduced-dose NOACs for indicated patient populations.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Many neutralizing agents of anticoagulant effect of factor Xa or thrombin inhibitors (xabans and dabigatran, respectively) have been developed since the commercialization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in 2008. Idarucizumab is a specific antidote of dabigatran commercialised since 2016. An antidote of xabans, andexanet-α, was very recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Other antidotes of DOAC are under pre-clinical or clinical development; the most advanced being the aripazine in addition to γ-thrombine S195A and GDFXa-α

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban

The COMPASS trial compared the impact of the selective direct factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, as monotherapy or in combination with aspirin on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease. Patients treated with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily in combination with aspirin experienced fewer cardiovascular events but more bleeding complications than those who received aspirin monotherapy. In contrast, a higher dose of rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily) and aspirin produced no clinical benefit and continued to be associated with greater bleeding rates than aspirin. Examining this study in the context of other trials of anticoagulant therapy in atherosclerotic vascular disease, this review attempts to place the role of very low-dose rivaroxaban in clinical context and highlights areas for future research.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention

Recent advances in our understanding of the contribution of thrombin generation to arterial thrombosis and the role of platelets in venous thrombosis have prompted new treatment paradigms. Nonetheless, bleeding remains the major side effect of such treatments spurring the quest for new antithrombotic regimens with better benefit-risk profiles and for safer anticoagulants for existing and new indications. The aims of this article are to review the results of recent trials aimed at enhancing the benefit-risk profile of antithrombotic therapy and explain how these findings are changing our approach to the management of arterial and venous thrombosis. Focusing on these 2 aspects of thrombosis management, this article discusses 4 advances: (1) the observation that in some indications, lowering the dose of some direct oral anticoagulants reduces the risk of bleeding without compromising efficacy, (2) the recognition that aspirin is not only effective for secondary prevention of atherothrombosis but also for prevention of venous thromboembolism, (3) the finding that dual pathway inhibition with the combination of low-dose rivaroxaban to attenuate thrombin generation plus aspirin to reduce thromboxane A2-mediated platelet activation is superior to aspirin or rivaroxaban alone for prevention of atherothrombosis in patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease, and (4) the development of inhibitors of factor XI or XII as potentially safer anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Factor XI; Factor XII; Hemorrhage; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Primary Prevention; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thrombin; Thrombosis; Venous Thrombosis

The most common causes of ischaemic stroke are represented by carotid artery atherosclerotic disease (CAAD) and atrial fibrillation. While oral anticoagulants substantially reduce the incidence of thromboembolic stroke (< 1%/year), the rate of ischaemic stroke and other cardiovascular disease events in patients with CAAD remains high, ranging from 8.4 to 18.1 events per 100 patient-years. Similar to any other atherosclerotic disease, anti-thrombotic therapies are proposed for CAAD to reduce stroke and other cardiovascular events. The 2017 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines recommend for patients with asymptomatic CAAD ≥60% the use of aspirin 75 to 100 mg once daily or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily at the exception of patient at very high bleeding risk. For patients with symptomatic CAAD ≥50%, the use of aspirin 75 to 100 mg once daily or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily is recommended. New perspectives for anti-thrombotic therapy for the treatment of patients with CAAD come from the novel dual pathway strategy combining a low-dose anticoagulant (i.e. rivaroxaban) and aspirin that may help reduce long-term ischaemic complications in patients with CAAD. This review summarizes current evidence and recommendations for the anti-thrombotic management of patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic CAAD or those undergoing carotid revascularization.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Cardiology; Cardiovascular Diseases; Carotid Arteries; Carotid Artery Diseases; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Revascularization; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk; Rivaroxaban

The purpose of this article is to educate staff nurses and advanced practice nurses the importance of identifying, diagnosing, and making appropriate clinical decisions when treating patients with atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation is a supraventricular arrhythmia characterized by uncoordinated, chaotic electrical activity and deterioration of proper atrial mechanical function, with an irregular ventricular response. Poorly controlled or undiagnosed atrial fibrillation increases the risk of mortality and may decrease quality of life. Identifying and staying abreast of cardiovascular care and current updates in treatment is strongly encouraged as guidelines are revised and updated as new treatments evolve.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Critical Care Nursing; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Many patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of recurrence if anticoagulant therapy is stopped. Whereas 3 months of anticoagulation treatment is sufficient for patients with VTE provoked by major surgery or trauma, in many cases a longer course is needed. Extended therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) requires frequent coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments to ensure that the international normalized ratio (INR) remains within the therapeutic range; furthermore, there is a risk of major bleeding even if a therapeutic INR is maintained. Therefore, more convenient and safer anticoagulants are needed.The non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs)-apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban-simplify extended therapy because they can be given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of NOACs for extended VTE treatment, but bleeding remains a concern. Patients and physicians may, therefore, be reluctant to continue anticoagulation beyond 3 to 6 months except in patients at high risk of recurrence. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is often prescribed instead of an anticoagulant because of its perceived lower risk of bleeding; however, the recent EINSTEIN CHOICE trial demonstrated that once-daily rivaroxaban at a dose of either 20 or 10 mg reduced the risk of recurrent VTE by 70% compared with ASA without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding. In this review, we discuss the EINSTEIN CHOICE trial in the context of previous trials for extended VTE treatment and examine some of the lessons that can be applied to clinical practice.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Canada; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Hemorrhage; Humans; Recurrence; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common life-threatening cardiovascular condition, with an incidence of 23 to 69 new cases per 100,000 people each year. For selected low-risk patients with acute PE, outpatient treatment might provide several advantages over traditional inpatient treatment, such as reduction of hospitalisations, substantial cost savings, and improvements in health-related quality of life. This is an update of the review first published in 2014.. To compare the efficacy and safety of outpatient versus inpatient treatment in low-risk patients with acute PE for the outcomes of all-cause and PE-related mortality; bleeding; adverse events such as haemodynamic instability; recurrence of PE; and patients' satisfaction.. The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and AMED databases, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers, to 26 March 2018. We also undertook reference checking to identify additional studies.. We included randomised controlled trials of outpatient versus inpatient treatment of adults (aged 18 years and over) diagnosed with low-risk acute PE.. Two review authors selected relevant trials, assessed methodological quality, and extracted and analysed data. We calculated effect estimates using risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), or mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. We used standardised mean differences (SMDs) to combine trials that measured the same outcome but used different methods. We assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE criteria.. One new study was identified for this 2018 update, bringing the total number of included studies to two and the total number of participants to 451. Both trials discharged patients randomised to the outpatient group within 36 hours of initial triage and both followed participants for 90 days. One study compared the same treatment regimens in both outpatient and inpatient groups, and the other study used different treatment regimes. There was no clear difference in treatment effect for the outcomes of short-term mortality (30 days) (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.98, P = 0.49; low-quality evidence), long-term mortality (90 days) (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.58, P = 0.99, low-quality evidence), major bleeding at 14 days (RR 4.91, 95% CI 0.24 to 101.57, P = 0.30; low-quality evidence) and at 90 days (RR 6.88, 95% CI 0.36 to 132.14, P = 0.20; low-quality evidence), minor bleeding (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.07 to 16.79; P = 0.96, low-quality evidence), recurrent PE within 90 days (RR 2.95, 95% CI 0.12 to 71.85, P = 0.51, low-quality evidence), and participant satisfaction (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.04, P = 0.39; moderate-quality evidence). We downgraded the quality of the evidence because the CIs were wide and included treatment effects in both directions, the sample sizes and numbers of events were small, and because the effect of missing data and the absence of publication bias could not be verified. PE-related mortality, and adverse effects such as haemodynamic instability and compliance, were not assessed by the included studies.. Currently, only low-quality evidence is available from two published randomised controlled trials on outpatient versus inpatient treatment in low-risk patients with acute PE. The studies did not provide evidence of any clear difference between the interventions in overall mortality, bleeding and recurrence of PE.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Ambulatory Care; Anticoagulants; Confidence Intervals; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban have at least comparable efficacy as vitamin K antagonists along with a better safety profile, reflected by a lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Specific reversal agents have been developed in recent years. Namely, idarucizumab, a specific antidote for dabigatran, is currently approved in most countries. Andexanet, which reverses factor Xa inhibitors, has been recently approved by the FDA, and ciraparantag, a universal antidote targeted to reverse all DOACs, is still under investigation. In this review we provide an update on the pharmacology of DOACs, the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with their use, the measurement of their anticoagulant effect and the reversal strategies in case of DOAC-associated bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Blood Coagulation Factors; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Cancer patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) are at an elevated risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and of major bleeding while receiving treatment with anticoagulation. Recently, Xa inhibitors have been assessed in cancer patients for the treatment of CAT, providing clinicians and patients with more treatment options.. In this narrative review, the authors evaluate the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in the treatment of CAT.. Xa inhibitors are an effective, safe, and convenient option for the treatment of CAT. Overall, they may be associated with a lower risk of recurrent VTE in cancer patients. Certain subgroups of cancer patients may be at increased risk of major bleeding while on treatment with Xa inhibitors, when compared to low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH). The current published data suggests an increase in gastrointestinal (GI) major bleeding in patients with GI malignancies. Other patient, treatment, and cancer characteristics may also be associated with a higher risk of major bleeding. Therefore, when assessing the appropriateness of Xa inhibitors for the treatment of CAT, the clinician must take into consideration the known interactions of these drugs, the individualized bleeding risk, and the patient's preferences, in order to make the best possible anticoagulation therapy recommendation.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) require long-term antithrombotic intervention to reduce the risk of further ischemic events; dual antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention

The review is devoted to the issue of optimal duration of anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolic complications (VTEC) using oral anticoagulants (OAC). These drugs are characterized by higher safety in comparison with vitamin K antagonists and make it possible to increase the duration of treatment for not only spontaneous thrombosis (with high risk of recurrence), but also thrombosis provoked by minor persistent and transient risk factors of VTEC. Efficacy and safety of prolonged treatment of VTEC using OAC was analyzed. Different classifications of primary thrombotic episode depending on risk of subsequent recurrence are presented. Moreover, scales for individual assessment of risk of recurrent thrombosis after anticoagulant therapy cancellation and risk of bleeding in case of continued treatment are given. Outcomes of long-term administration of rivaroxaban for VTEC are analyzed. It was concluded that OAC are safe for prolonged management of primary thrombotic episode. However, overall duration of treatment should be determined considering individual balance of benefits and risks.. Статья представляет собой классический обзор литературы, посвященный вопросам определения оптимальной длительности антикоагулянтной терапии венозных тромбоэмболических осложнений (ВТЭО) в свете широкого внедрения прямых оральных антикоагулянтов (ПОАК). Последние, обладая в сравнении с антагонистами витамина K улучшенным профилем безопасности, позволяют увеличивать длительность лечения не только клинически неспровоцированных тромбозов (наиболее опасных в отношении рецидива), но и спровоцированных малыми персистирующими и транзиторными факторами риска ВТЭО, характеризующихся меньшей угрозой. Проведен анализ результатов исследований по изучению эффективности и безопасности продленной терапии ВТЭО с помощью ПОАК. Представлены различные классификации первичного тромботического эпизода в зависимости от его влияния на риск рецидива, приведены шкалы для индивидуальной оценки угрозы повторного тромбоза после отмены антикоагулянта и опасности кровотечения при продолжении лечения. Проанализированы результаты длительного применения ривароксабана при спровоцированных ВТЭО. Сделан вывод, что применение ПОАК позволяет безопасно увеличивать продолжительность терапии первичного эпизода, однако общая длительность лечения должна быть основана на индивидуальном балансе пользы и риска.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Venous Thromboembolism; Withholding Treatment

Topics: Animals; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention

Background Several studies have investigated the effect of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with cancer, but the results remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin in this population. Methods and Results We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until February 16, 2019 for studies comparing the effect of NOACs with warfarin in AF patients with cancer. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were extracted and pooled by a random-effects model. Five studies involving 8908 NOACs and 12 440 warfarin users were included. There were no significant associations between cancer status and risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death in AF patients. Compared with warfarin, NOACs were associated with decreased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.99), venous thromboembolism (RR, 0.37, 95% CI, 0.22-0.63), and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98) and with borderline significant reductions in ischemic stroke (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00) and major bleeding (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1.00). In addition, risks of efficacy and safety outcomes of NOACs versus warfarin were similar between AF patients with and without cancer. Conclusions In patients with AF and cancer, compared with warfarin, NOACs had lower or similar rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events and posed a reduced risk of venous thromboembolism.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

 This article evaluates the preventive effects of rivaroxaban versus aspirin on venous thromboembolism (VTE) through meta-analysis of recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs)..  RCTs were retrieved from medical literature databases. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the primary and safety endpoints..  In total, 9 trials (11 trial comparisons) were retrieved which contained 7,656 patients. Among these patients, 4,383 patients (57.2%) received rivaroxaban, whereas 3,273 patients (42.8%) received aspirin. Compared with aspirin, rivaroxaban significantly reduced VTE (1.3% vs. 3.5%) (RR: 0.36, 95% CI, 0.26-0.48,.  This meta-analysis indicated that rivaroxaban can significantly reduce the incidence of VTE when compared with aspirin. The preventive effect of rivaroxaban on VTE was more potent than that of aspirin. However, rivaroxaban had some negative side effects to patients such as nonmajor bleeding compared to aspirin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant healthcare burden with approximately 900,000 events annually in the United States, over half of which are healthcare-associated. This number is anticipated to double by 2050. Group prophylaxis strategies confined to the inpatient setting appear to have minimal impact on the reduction of post-discharge VTE in medically ill patients due to shortened lengths of stay and a heterogenous population that includes patients at low risk for VTE. In accordance with current guideline recommendations, very few (<5%) medically ill patients are discharged with extended prophylaxis, which potentially creates a clinical gap for at-risk patients as VTE risk has been shown to persist for up to 90 days. Initial studies of extended thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with enoxaparin, rivaroxaban and apixaban showed little to no benefit towards VTE reduction that was consistently outweighed by increased bleeding. The more recent APEX study that compared betrixaban to enoxaparin in an enriched patient population at high-risk for VTE was the first study of extended thromboprophylaxis that showed similar efficacy in VTE prevention without an increase in major bleeding. Based on the APEX results, betrixaban recently gained FDA approval for extended thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. Recognition that up to half of medically ill patients are not at sufficient risk to warrant thromboprophylaxis has driven extensive research towards development of scientifically derived and validated VTE risk assessment models intended to identify patients who do not warrant prophylaxis, as well as those at high risk who may derive benefit from extended thromboprophylaxis. This article will review prior and ongoing extended thromboprophylaxis studies, VTE and bleed risk assessment models, incorporation of biomarkers in VTE risk assessment and key issues in the paradigm shift towards individualized VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients.

Topics: Age Factors; Anticoagulants; Benzamides; Drug Administration Schedule; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Mobility Limitation; Patient Discharge; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Venous Thromboembolism

The significance of adding new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) to antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of adding NOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) to single antiplatelet agent (SAP) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with ACS. Seven randomized controlled trials were selected using PubMed or MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane library (inception to August 2017). The summary measure was random effects hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary safety outcome was clinically significant bleeding. The secondary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality). In 31,574 patients, addition of NOAC to SAP did not increase the risk of clinically significant bleeding (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.20, p = 0.31); however, the risk of clinically significant bleeding was significantly increased with NOAC plus DAPT (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.75 to 2.87, p < 0.001). NOACs had no statistically beneficial effect on MACE when used with SAP (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.04, p = 0.10); however, a modest reduction in MACE was observed when NOACs were combined with DAPT (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.93, p < 0.001). In conclusion, in patients with ACS, the addition of NOAC to DAPT resulted in increased risk of clinically significant bleeding, whereas only a modest reduction in MACE was achieved. The addition of NOACs to SAP did not result in significant reduction of MACE or increase in clinically significant bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

Vitamin K antagonists were the only choice for chronic oral anticoagulation for more than half a century. Over the past few years, direct oral anticoagulants have emerged, including one direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran etexilate) and three factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban). In randomised controlled trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants with traditional vitamin K antagonists, the direct oral anticoagulants all showed a favourable benefit-risk balance in their safety and efficacy profile, in prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndrome. In 2008, dabigatran was the first direct oral anticoagulant approved by the European Medicine Agency. Subsequently, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban were also authorised. This article reviews the evidence related to the use of these drugs.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Withholding Treatment

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and it leads to significant morbidity and mortality, predominantly from ischemic stroke. Vitamin K antagonists, mainly warfarin, have been used for decades to prevent ischemic stroke in AF, but their use is limited due to interactions with food and other drugs, as well as the requirement for regular monitoring of the international normalized ratio. Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor and the most commonly used non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant, avoids many of these challenges and is being prescribed with increasing frequency for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) data from the ROCKET-AF(Rivaroxaban once daily oral direct Factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation) trial have shown rivaroxaban to be non-inferior to warfarin in preventing ischemic stroke and systemic embolism and to have comparable overall bleeding rates. Applicability of the RCT data to real-world practice can sometimes be limited by complex clinical scenarios or multiple comorbidities not adequately represented in the trials. Available real-world evidence in non-valvular AF patients with comorbidities - including renal impairment, acute coronary syndrome, diabetes mellitus, malignancy, or old age - supports the use of rivaroxaban as safe and effective in preventing ischemic stroke in these subgroups, though with some important considerations required to reduce bleeding risk. Patient perspectives on rivaroxaban use are also considered. Real-world evidence indicates superior rates of drug adherence with rivaroxaban when compared with vitamin K antagonists and with alternative non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants - perhaps, in part, due to its once-daily dosing regimen. Furthermore, self-reported quality of life scores are highest among patients compliant with rivaroxaban therapy. The generally high levels of patient satisfaction with rivaroxaban therapy contribute to overall favorable clinical outcomes.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Brain Ischemia; Comorbidity; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Safety; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

The optimal treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis (ST) of the legs remains poorly defined. While improving or relieving the local painful symptoms, treatment should aim at preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), which might complicate the natural history of ST. This is the third update of a review first published in 2007.. To assess the efficacy and safety of topical, medical, and surgical treatments for ST of the leg in improving local symptoms and decreasing thromboembolic complications.. For this update, the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register (March 2017), CENTRAL (2017, Issue 2), and trials registries (March 2017). We handsearched the reference lists of relevant papers and conference proceedings.. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating topical, medical, and surgical treatments for ST of the legs that included people with a clinical diagnosis of ST of the legs or objective diagnosis of a thrombus in a superficial vein.. Two authors assessed the trials for inclusion in the review, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of the studies. Data were independently extracted from the included studies and any disagreements resolved by consensus. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.. We identified three additional trials (613 participants), therefore this update considered 33 studies involving 7296 people with ST of the legs. Treatment included fondaparinux; rivaroxaban; low molecular weight heparin (LMWH); unfractionated heparin (UFH); non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); compression stockings; and topical, intramuscular, or intravenous treatment to surgical interventions such as thrombectomy or ligation. Only a minority of trials compared treatment with placebo rather than an alternative treatment and many studies were small and of poor quality. Pooling of the data was possible for few outcomes, and none were part of a placebo-controlled trial. In one large, placebo-controlled RCT of 3002 participants, subcutaneous fondaparinux was associated with a significant reduction in symptomatic VTE (risk ratio (RR) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.50; moderate-quality evidence), ST extension (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.22; moderate-quality evidence), and ST recurrence (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.54; moderate-quality evidence) relative to placebo. Major bleeding was infrequent in both groups with very wide CIs around risk estimate (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.86; moderate-quality evidence). In one RCT on 472 high-risk participants with ST, fondaparinux was associated with a non-significant reduction of symptomatic VTE compared to rivaroxaban 10 mg (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.18; low-quality evidence). There were no major bleeding events in either group (low-quality evidence). In another placebo-controlled trial, both prophylactic and therapeutic doses of LMWH (prophylactic: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.74; therapeutic: RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.77) and NSAIDs (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.78) reduced the extension (low-quality evidence) and recurrence of ST (low-quality evidence) in comparison to placebo, with no significant effects on symptomatic VTE (low-quality evidence) or major bleeding (low-quality evidence). Overall, topical treatments improved local symptoms compared with placebo, but no data were provided on the effects on VTE and ST extension. Surgical treatment combined with elastic stockings was associated with a lower VTE rate and ST progression compared with elastic stockings alone. However, the majority of studies that compared different oral treatments, topical treatments, or surgery did not report VTE, ST progression, adverse events, or treatment adverse effects.. Prophylactic dose fondaparinux given for 45 days appears to be a valid therapeutic option for ST of the legs for most people. The evidence on topical treatment or surgery is too limited and does not inform clinical practice about the effects of these treatments in terms of VTE. Further research is needed to assess the role of rivaroxaban and other direct oral factor-X or thrombin inhibitors, LMWH, and NSAIDs; the optimal doses and duration of treatment in people at various risk of recurrence; and whether a combination therapy may be more effective than single treatment. Adequately designed and conducted studies are required to clarify the role of topical and surgical treatments.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Polysaccharides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stockings, Compression; Thrombectomy; Thromboembolism; Thrombophlebitis; Venous Thromboembolism

Antithrombotic treatment puts patients at risk of major bleeding. Fast and adequate response to anticoagulant-associated bleeding may not only stop the bleeding but prevent severe complications. However, practical treatment algorithms to guide physicians in emergency situations are lacking. Important principles that arise from management of bleeding in general are (a) implementation of an in-house algorithm, (b) rapid identification and treatment of the bleeding source, (c) adequate fluid resuscitation, (d) consideration of the application of tranexamic acid and (e) appropriate coagulation testing. We present an algorithm for anticoagulant-associated bleeding and urgent surgery, derived from available data and recommendations, and implemented at our institution. Decisions regarding reversal agents or postponing surgery are based on two questions: the occurrence of a life-threatening bleed or urgent indication for surgery, and the presence of a relevant drug level. Immediate application of reversal agents is suggested if the clinical situation is urgent and laboratory test results are delayed or unavailable. A relevant anticoagulant drug level is required in all other cases. We discuss appropriate laboratory assays for all commonly available anticoagulants, report respective target ranges or expected values, discuss time intervals before surgery, and present critical cut-off values to be used as decision criteria. Specific and unspecific reversal agents for all anticoagulants including the direct oral anticoagulants will be presented. We aim to provide practical guidance for physicians in emergency situations. In addition, we summarise and discuss available experimental and clinical data as well as recommendations provided by scientific societies, authorities and manufacturers.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban

The pathophysiology of atherosclerosis involves a diseased endothelium, lipid accumulation and low-grade inflammation. In later stages of coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD), plaque rupture may induce atherothrombosis caused by fibrin formation and platelet activation, leading to vessel occlusion with subsequent organ damage such as myocardial infarction, stroke or limb ischaemia. Because of the high disease burden associated with CAD and PAD, there is a need for continuous vascular protection beyond currently available treatments including antiplatelet agents. Due to its central role in the coagulation cascade, inhibition of factor Xa, with the subsequent reduced thrombin formation that impacts not only fibrin but also platelets, may provide additional benefit over using antiplatelets alone. Evidence from Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction-51 (ATLAS-ACS 2-TIMI 51) supports the use of the direct, oral, factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice-daily [bid] and 5 mg bid) in reducing mortality and morbidity in patients with acute coronary syndrome, when combined with antiplatelets. Here, we review the role of rivaroxaban in three clinical trials of CAD and/or PAD: Cardiovascular OutcoMes for People using Anticoagulation StrategieS (COMPASS), Vascular Outcomes studY of ASA alonG with rivaroxaban in Endovascular or surgical limb Revascularization for PAD (VOYAGER PAD) and Cardiovascular Outcome Modification, Measurement AND Evaluation of Rivaroxaban in patients with Heart Failure (COMMANDER HF).

Topics: Blood Coagulation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

Rivaroxaban is a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant that acts as a direct factor Xa inhibitor, and is widely used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. As further knowledge gaps are identified in thrombosis management, the rivaroxaban research program has expanded in an attempt to elucidate the wider benefits of rivaroxaban. An increased understanding of the interactions taking place within the coagulation cascade may support a broader role for rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily [bid] or 5 mg bid) in the setting of vascular protection, either alone or in combination with an antiplatelet agent. The aim of this article is to describe the potential role of rivaroxaban in the context of vascular protection and provide an overview of recently completed and ongoing randomized controlled trials of rivaroxaban in the areas of stroke prevention, venous protection and vascular protection.

Topics: Blood Coagulation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) presents a continuing clinical burden to healthcare systems and there are patient groups for whom VTE management is challenging. Depending on the patient profile, the optimal duration of anticoagulation for VTE treatment can be unclear. EINSTEIN CHOICE was a Phase III, randomized, double-blind trial that compared the safety and efficacy of two once-daily (od) doses of the direct, oral factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban (20 and 10 mg) with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; 100 mg daily) for prevention of recurrent VTE. Extended therapy with rivaroxaban at either dose was more effective than ASA at preventing recurrent VTE without increasing bleeding risk. Another group that is challenging to treat in the context of VTE is patients with cancer-associated thrombosis. Cancer is associated with a hypercoagulable state, while cancer treatment itself may increase VTE risk. Evidence supporting the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with cancer is growing through specifically designed studies. Cancer Associated thrombosis-expLoring soLutions for patIentS through Treatment and prevention with rivarOxaban (CALLISTO) is an international research program exploring the role of rivaroxaban for the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. Here, we present overviews of three CALLISTO studies: PRO-LAPS II, CASTA-DIVA and COSIMO. Currently available and anticipated results from studies in a variety of patients at risk of or with VTE will provide valuable insights and seek to optimize future VTE management.

Topics: Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Left ventricular (LV) thrombus is commonly seen in patients with extensive anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The standard of care for LV thrombus is anticoagulation with warfarin. However, there has been an increasing trend of case reports using non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) for the treatment of LV thrombus. This study aimed to perform a meta-summary of the literature to characterise and evaluate the safety and feasibility of using NOAC in patients with LV thrombus. We searched for articles published in four electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar using an appropriate keyword/MeSH term search strategy. Twenty-four studies comprising 36 patients were included in the analysis. Rivaroxaban was used in majority of patients (47.2%), whilst Apixaban and Dabigatran were prescribed in 25.0% and 27.8% of patients respectively. The most commonly associated risk factor found was post-acute myocardial infarction in 15 patients (41.7%). LV thrombus resolution was met by most patients (87.9%), and the median duration of treatment to resolution was 30.0 days (IQR = 22.5-47.0). One non-fatal bleeding event (3.0%) and no embolic events were reported. The use of NOAC may have a role in the treatment of LV thrombus in selected patients. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate this treatment strategy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Topics: Aspirin; Carotid Artery Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Blood Coagulation Tests; Colonoscopy; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Premedication; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; DNA; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Histones; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and its prevalence increases with age. Age also increases the risk of thromboembolism related to AF. As a result, elderly patients are at increased risk of AF-related stroke compared to younger patients. Age, however, also increases the risk of bleeding, including that of intracranial haemorrhage, an important cause of death and disability. Elderly patients with AF are, therefore, often undertreated due to the fear of bleeding complications, although recent data suggest an even greater net clinical benefit for anticoagulation in general in the elderly, even the very elderly, compared with younger patients. The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, have become popular alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for anticoagulation in AF. The improved safety profile of NOACs may enable treatment of elderly patients that were previously untreated, further improving on this net clinical benefit. However, a number of factors, including renal impairment and multiple comorbidities, may elicit in elderly patients concerns with NOACs that are not seen in younger patients. Recent clinical data suggest that the use of NOACs offers a safer alternative to VKAs. However, on the basis of current evidence, it is not possible to simply recommend one NOAC over another in elderly adults. A personalised approach is recommended, accounting for individual patient factors.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Neoplasms; Patient Discharge; Patient Selection; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Thiazoles

Intravenous andexanet alfa [coagulation factor Xa (recombinant), inactivated-zhzo; Andexxa

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Blood Coagulation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Approval; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

To assess the incremental benefit of uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for catheter ablation (CA) of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) on three primary outcomes: major bleeding, thrombo-embolic events, and minor bleeding. A secondary outcome was post-procedural silent cerebral infarction (SCI) as detected by brain magnetic resonance imaging.. A systematic review of Medline, Cochrane, and Embase was done to find all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which uninterrupted DOACs were compared against uninterrupted VKA for CA of NVAF. A fixed-effect model was used, with the exception of the analysis regarding major bleeding events (I2 > 25), for which a random effects model was used. The benefit of uninterrupted DOACs over VKA was analysed from four RCTs that enrolled a total of 1716 patients (male: 71.2%) with NVAF. Of these, 1100 patients (64.1%) had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. No significant benefit was seen in major bleeding events [risk ratio (RR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.29-1.00; P = 0.05]. No significant differences were found in minor bleeding events (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.82-1.52; P = 0.50), thrombo-embolic events (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.26-2.11; P = 0.57), or post-procedural SCI (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.74-1.53; P = 0.74).. An uninterrupted DOACs strategy for CA of NVAF appears to be as safe as uninterrupted VKA without a significantly increased risk of minor or major bleeding events. There was a trend favouring DOACs in terms of major bleeding. Given their ease of use, fewer drug interactions and a similar security and effectiveness profile, DOACs should be considered first line therapy in patients undergoing CA for NVAF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Cerebral Infarction; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Mortality; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Stroke; Thrombophilia; Ticlopidine

To compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, apixaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after arthroplastic surgery.. We conducted a meta-analysis containing a wide range of randomized controlled trials about efficiency and safety of rivaroxaban, apixaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after arthroplastic surgery in the recent decade from January 2006 to June 2018. The present study separately analyzed the following key components: the different efficiency and safety for rivaroxaban and enoxaparin; apixaban and enoxaparin; and enoxaparin and other new developed anticoagulants.. Sixteen studies containing 58885 patients were included. In results of efficacy outcomes, total events occurred in 4.89% patients of rivaroxaban group and 9.55% patients of the control group; however, no significant difference was observed in apixaban groups of their efficacy outcomes. Primary events didn't show significant difference when comparing apixaban with the control or comparing enoxaparin with the control. In analysis of safety outcomes, bleeding events occurred in 3.41% patients of rivaroxaban group compared with 2.84% patients of the control groups; bleeding events in apixaban groups were 4.09% compared with the control groups 4.64%. Bleeding events occurred in 3.51% patients of enoxaparin group, slightly lower than 5.82% of the control group.. Direct oral anticoagulant, rivaroxaban might have better efficacy outcomes in thromboprophylaxis after arthroplastic surgery; however, apixaban showed no significantly different efficacy outcomes compared with enoxaparin, and enoxaparin may have equal or even better safety outcomes compared with direct oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban and edoxaban are the four available new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) which are currently approved for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip and knee replacement. Large phase 3 and phase 4 studies comparing NOAC with low molecular weight heparins have shown similar results regarding the efficacy and safety of these two categories of anticoagulants. Management of bleeding complications is a matter of great significance. Three reversal agents have been developed: idarucizumab, andexanet alfa and ciraparantag. Idarucizumab is now commercially available. Regarding the perioperative management of NOAC, two main scientific groups have published their own recommendations. The European Heart Rhythm Association recommends 48-h period of stoppage preoperatively for factor Xa inhibitors and at least 3 or 4 days for dabigatran, while the French Study Group on Thrombosis and Haemostasis recommends 5-day discontinuation for all NOAC. Conventional clot tests can only be used as rough indicators for laboratory assessment of the activity of NOAC. Specific laboratory tests have been developed for more accurate measurements of NOAC blood levels, including a dilute thrombin time test (Hemoclot test) and the ecarin clot test for dabigatran and chromogenic anti-factor Xa assays for direct factor Xa inhibitors. Due to the beneficial properties of NOAC, these drugs are gaining ground in daily orthopaedic practice, and many studies are being conducted in order to extend the indications of these anticoagulants agents.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Hemorrhage; Humans; Orthopedic Procedures; Piperazines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Registries and non-interventional studies offer relevant and complementary information to clinical trials, since they have a high external validity. Areas covered: The information regarding the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin, or rivaroxaban alone in clinical practice was reviewed in this manuscript. For this purpose, a search on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed. The MEDLINE and EMBASE search included both medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords including: atrial fibrillation (AF) OR warfarin OR clinical practice OR ROCKET AF AND rivaroxaban. Case reports were not considered. Expert commentary: In ROCKET AF, rivaroxaban was at least as effective as warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF at high risk of stroke, but, importantly, with a lesser risk of intracranial, critical and fatal bleedings. A number of observational comparative and non-comparative studies, with more than 60,000 patients included treated with rivaroxaban, have analyzed the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in real-life patients with AF in different clinical settings. These studies have shown that in clinical practice, rates of stroke and major bleeding were consistently lower than those reported in ROCKET AF, likely due to the lower thromboembolic and bleeding risk observed in these patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are administered in fixed doses without anticoagulant monitoring. Randomized trials show that unmonitored NOAC therapy is at least as effective as and safer than dose-adjusted warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Subgroup analyses indicate that plasma drug levels or anticoagulant activity of the NOACs predict stroke and bleeding. This review examines the historical basis for anticoagulant monitoring, discusses methods to measure and interpret drug levels, and critically assesses the role of routine laboratory monitoring in the management of NOAC therapy.. The predictable anticoagulant response of NOACs has provided the pharmacological basis for their administration in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Although it is possible to accurately measure NOAC drug levels, within-patient variability complicates interpretation of these results. Furthermore, patient characteristics, such as age and renal function, confound the association between NOAC drug levels and clinical outcomes. Information is lacking on the optimal drug level in particular patient groups (eg, elderly, the renally impaired, and those with high bleeding risk), the appropriate dose adjustment to achieve expected levels, and whether routine laboratory monitoring and dose adjustment will improve clinical outcomes. A benefit of a management strategy that incorporates routine therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment over current standard-of-care metrics without such monitoring remains unproven.. Robust evidence from patients with atrial fibrillation randomized to NOACs or warfarin demonstrates that unmonitored NOAC therapy is at least as effective and safe as monitored warfarin, with lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage and reduced mortality. Further research is required to determine whether routine laboratory monitoring might provide a net benefit for patients. Until such data are available, clinicians should continue to prescribe NOACs in fixed doses without routine monitoring.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Prothrombin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Thiazoles; Thrombin Time; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were developed to compensate for the demerits of warfarin. In Japan, three factor Xa inhibitors are used for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE): edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Despite problems, such as the inability to monitor their effect and the lack of an antidote, these inhibitors have the same efficacy as conventional treatment with warfarin, and they are associated with a significantly high degree of safety in relation to hemorrhagic complications. East Asians, including Japanese, suffer from hemorrhage more frequently; therefore, DOACs are considered to be highly effective. Although there is no evidence to date, DOACs may be effective in a wide variety of ways, including the possibility that they prevent recurrence over the long term, reduce the length of hospitalization, allow treatment to be started on an outpatient basis, and be effective in cancer patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Japan; Neoplasms; Outpatients; Platelet Count; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). As in the general population, in CKD patients AF is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism and stroke. However, CKD patients, especially those on renal replacement therapy (RRT), also exhibit an increased risk of bleeding, especially from the gastrointestinal tract. Oral anticoagulation is the most effective form of thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF presenting increased risk of stroke. Limited evidence on efficacy, the increased risk of bleeding as well as some concern regarding the use of warfarin in CKD, has often resulted in the underuse of anticoagulation CKD patients. A large body of evidence suggests that non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) significantly reduce the risk of stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin in normal renal function subjects. Hence, they are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. However, NOACs metabolism is largely dependent on the kidneys for elimination and little is known in patients with creatinine clearance <25ml/min who were excluded from all pivotal phase 3 NOACs trials. This review focuses on the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance 15-49ml/min) and those on dialysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Renal impairment increases risk of stroke and systemic embolic events and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have varied dependence on renal elimination, magnifying the importance of appropriate patient selection, dosing, and periodic kidney function monitoring. In randomized controlled trials of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, DOACs were at least as effective and associated with less bleeding compared with warfarin. Each direct oral anticoagulant was associated with reduced risk of stroke and systemic embolic events and major bleeding compared with warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. Renal function decrease appears less impacted by DOACs, which are associated with a better risk-benefit profile than warfarin in patients with decreasing renal function over time. Limited data address the risk-benefit profile of DOACs in patients with severe impairment or on dialysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pharmaceutical Research; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolism causes significant morbidity and mortality in patients after total joint arthroplasty. Although network meta-analyses have demonstrated a benefit of various thromboprophylactic agents, there remains a concern in the surgical community regarding the resulting wound complications. There is currently no systematic review of the surgical site bleeding complications of thromboprophylactic agents. The aim of this study was to systematically review the surgical site bleeding outcomes of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in this population.. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Randomized controlled trials comparing more than one of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), warfarin, rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, aspirin, or no pharmacologic treatment in patients after total hip or knee arthroplasty were selected for inclusion. Five meta-analyses were performed to compare LMWH with control, warfarin, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran.. Forty-five randomized controlled trials of 56,730 patients were included. LMWH had a significantly increased relative risk of surgical site bleeding in comparison with control (relative risk, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-3.85) and warfarin (1.54; 1.23-1.94). The relative risk of LMWH trended higher than apixaban (1.27; 1.00-1.63) and was similar to rivaroxaban (0.95; 0.74-1.23). Only 1 study reported the risk of surgical site bleeding in LMWH vs dabigatran (5.97; 2.08-17.11).. LMWH increased the risk of surgical site bleeding compared with control, warfarin. and dabigatran and trended toward an increased risk compared with apixaban. The risk of surgical site bleeding was similar with LMWH and rivaroxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Aspirin; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Incidence; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Anticoagulation, reducing the risk of thromboembolic events in patients undergoing cardioversion, is a cornerstone of peri-cardioversion management in patients with atrial fibrillation. We aimed to analyse published data on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients undergoing cardioversion. We performed a systematic review of randomized prospective clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with warfarin and reporting data on post-cardioversion outcomes of interest. Outcomes of interest were stroke, systemic thromboembolic events and major bleeding. We reviewed a total of six RCTs including 3900 cardioversions performed using a DOAC for thromboembolic prophylaxis. These studies reported a low incidence overall of adverse outcomes associated with the use of DOACs (around 1% in all studies, except the ROCKET post-hoc study which included ablation procedures). The incidence rate of adverse events during DOAC treatment was found to be very similar to that observed with warfarin anticoagulation. In RCTs DOAC treatment in patients undergoing cardioversion appears to be effective and safe. However, because evidence in this clinical setting is still weak, observational reports could be useful in providing further data about peri-procedural outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

To conduct a systematic review of real-world (RWD) studies comparing the risk of major bleeding (MB) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin.. MEDLINE, Embase, NHS-EED, and EconLit were searched for RWD studies published between January 2003 and November 2016 comparing MB risk among DOACs and warfarin. Proceedings of clinical conferences from 2012 to 2016 were reviewed.. A total of 4218 citations were identified, 26 of which met eligibility criteria. Most studies were retrospective analyses of administrative claims databases and patient registries (n = 23 of 26); about half were based in the United States (n = 15). Apixaban showed a significantly lower risk of MB versus warfarin in all eight included studies. MB risk was either significantly lower (n = 9 of 16) or not significantly different (n = 7 of 16) between dabigatran and warfarin; there was no significant difference between rivaroxaban and warfarin in all seven included studies. The risk was significantly lower with apixaban versus rivaroxaban (n = 7 of 7) but not significantly different from dabigatran (n = 6 of 7). MB risk was significantly lower (n = 3 of 4) or not significantly different (n = 1 of 4) with dabigatran versus rivaroxaban. No evidence was identified for edoxaban.. DOACs were associated with similar or lower risks of MB versus warfarin. A lower MB risk was consistently observed for apixaban, but less consistently for dabigatran; MB risk was similar between rivaroxaban and warfarin. Among DOACs, the risk of MB with apixaban was consistently lower than with rivaroxaban, but similar to dabigatran.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

In the EINSTEIN-Pulmonary Embolism (PE) trial, subjects randomized to rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin bridging to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy experienced a reduced index hospital length of stay (LOS). We sought to conduct a systematic review of real-world studies comparing LOS, costs and early outcomes among patients treated with rivaroxaban or parenterally bridged VKA in routine practice.. We searched Medline and Scopus from 1 January 2011 to 30 November 2016 to identify observational studies comparing acute PE patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban or parenterally bridged VKA and reporting data on index hospital LOS, costs and/or early post-PE outcomes. Studies not using appropriate methods for minimizing confounding bias or not published in English were excluded.. Five studies met inclusion criteria. Rivaroxaban use was associated with decreased index hospital LOS (range: 1.36-1.70 days) and treatment costs (range: $1818-$2688) during an index stay compared to parenterally bridged warfarin. No differences in early readmission for recurrent thrombosis were noted between anticoagulation strategies. Readmission for major bleeding was rare in both cohorts. Similar reductions in LOS (range: 0.23-4.3 days) and costs (range: $251-$7094) were observed with rivaroxaban in studies restricted to patients deemed low risk for early complications by clinical gestalt or by a clinical- or claims-based risk stratification tool.. Regardless of patient predicted risk of post-PE complications, real-world studies suggest that rivaroxaban is associated with a reduced hospital LOS and costs versus parenterally bridged warfarin, without increasing readmission.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Health Care Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Length of Stay; Pulmonary Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are indicated for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. As any anticoagulant, they are associated with a bleeding risk. Management of DOAC-induced bleeding is challenging. Idarucizumab, antidote for dabigatran, is currently available and is part of the therapeutic strategy, whereas antidotes for anti-Xa agents are under development. Activated or non-activated prothrombin concentrates are proposed, although their efficacy to reverse DOAC is uncertain. We propose an update on DOAC-associated bleeding management, integrating the availability of idarucizumab and the critical place of DOAC concentration measurements.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Arginine; Blood Coagulation Factors; Blood Transfusion; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Piperazines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombophilia

Evidence from the real-world setting complements evidence coming from randomized controlled trials. We aimed to summarize all available evidence from high-quality real-world observational studies about efficacy and safety of nonvitamin-K oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin-K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation.. We searched PubMed and Web of Science until January 7, 2017 for observational nationwide or health insurance databases reporting matched or adjusted results comparing nonvitamin-K oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation. Outcomes assessed included ischemic stroke, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, any stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, major hemorrhage, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and death.. In 28 included studies of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared with vitamin-K antagonists, all 3 nonvitamin-K oral anticoagulants were associated with a large reduction of intracranial hemorrhage (apixaban hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.63; dabigatran HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.37-0.49; rivaroxaban HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.86); similar rates of ischemic stroke and ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (apixaban HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.75-1.19 and HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.95-1.22 / dabigatran HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80-1.16 and HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92-1.50 / rivaroxaban HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76-1.04 and HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52-1.04, respectively); apixaban and dabigatran with lower mortality (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.75 and HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53-0.75, respectively); apixaban with fewer gastrointestinal (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95) and major hemorrhages (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.63); dabigatran and rivaroxaban with more gastrointestinal hemorrhages (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.36 and HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.41, respectively); dabigatran and rivaroxaban with similar rate of myocardial infarction (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77-1.21 and HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.54-1.89, respectively).. This meta-analysis confirms the main findings of the randomized controlled trials of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in the real-world setting and, hence, strengthens their validity.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Anticoagulation in patients with impaired kidney function can be challenging since drugs' pharmacokinetics and bioavailability are altered in this setting. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) treated with conventional anticoagulant agents [vitamin K antagonist (VKA), low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH)] are at high risk of bleeding events (both non-major and major clinically relevant bleeding). While anticoagulation reduces the risk of thromboembolic events, the co-existing bleeding risk and the fact that the most commonly used anticoagulation agents are eliminated via the kidneys pose additional challenges. More recently, two classes of direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) have been investigated for the prevention and management of venous thromboembolic events: the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. In this review, we discuss the complex challenges and the practical considerations associated with the management of anticoagulation treatment in patients with CKD, with a special focus on DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Vitamin K

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by arterial or venous thrombosis (or both) and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. The prevalence is estimated at 40 to 50 cases per 100,000 people. The most common sites of thrombosis are cerebral arteries and deep veins of the lower limbs. People with a definite APS diagnosis have an increased lifetime risk of recurrent thrombotic events.. To assess the effects of antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents, or both, for the secondary prevention of recurrent thrombosis, particularly ischemic stroke, in people with antiphospholipid syndrome.. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (February 2017), CENTRAL (last search February 2017), MEDLINE (from 1948 to February 2017), Embase (from 1980 to February 2017), and several ongoing trials registers. We also checked the reference lists of included studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines, and we contacted experts in the field.. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated any anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent, or both, in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in people diagnosed with APS according to the criteria valid when the study took place. We did not include studies specifically addressing women with obstetrical APS.. Pairs of review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias for the included studies. We resolved any discrepancies through discussion or by consulting a third review author and, in addition, one review author checked all the extracted data.. We included five studies involving 419 randomized participants with APS. Only one study was at low risk of bias in all domains. One study was at low risk of bias in all domains for objective outcomes but not for quality of life (measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire). We judged the other three studies to be at unclear or high risk of bias in three or more domains.The duration of intervention ranged from 180 days to a mean of 3.9 years. One study compared rivaroxaban (a novel oral anticoagulant: NOAC) with standard warfarin treatment and reported no thrombotic or major bleeding events, but it was not powered to detect such differences (low-quality evidence). Investigators reported similar rates of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (risk ratio (RR) 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 8.33; moderate-quality evidence) and minor bleeding (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.83) for participants receiving rivaroxaban and the standard vitamin K antagonists (VKA). This study also reported some small benefit with rivaroxaban over the standard VKA treatment in terms of quality of life health state measured at 180 days with the EQ-5D-5L 100 mm visual analogue scale (mean difference (MD) 7 mm, 95% CI 2.01 to 11.99; low-quality evidence) but not measured as health utility (MD 0.04, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.10 [on a scale from 0 to 1]).Two studies compared high dose VKA (warfarin) with moderate/standard intensity VKA and found no differences in the rates of any thrombotic events (RR 2.22, 95% CI 0.79 to 6.23) or major bleeding (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.25) between the groups (low-quality evidence). Minor bleeding analyzed using the RR and any bleeding using the hazard ratio (HR) were more frequent in participants receiving high-intensity warfarin treatment compared to the standard-intensity therapy (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.07 to 6.07; and HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.68; low-quality evidence).In one study, it was not possible to estimate the RR for stroke with a combination of VKA plus antiplatelet agent compared to a single antiplatelet agent, while for major bleeding, a single event occurred in the single antiplatelet agent group. In one study, comparing combined VKA plus antiplatelet agent with dual antiplatelet therapy, the RR of the risk of stroke over three years of observation was 5.00 (95% CI 0.26 to 98.0). In a single small study, the RR for stroke during one year of observation with a dual antiplatelet therapy compared to single antiplatelet drug was 0.14 (95% CI 0.01. There is not enough evidence for or against NOACs or for high-intensity VKA compared to the standard VKA therapy in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in people with APS. There is some evidence of harm for high-intensity VKA regarding minor and any bleeding. The evidence was also not sufficient to show benefit or harm for VKA plus antiplatelet agent or dual antiplatelet therapy compared to a single antiplatelet drug. Future studies should be adequately powered, with proper adherence to treatment, in order to evaluate the effects of anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or both, for secondary thrombosis prevention in APS. We have identified five ongoing trials mainly using NOACs in APS, so increasing experimental efforts are likely to yield additional evidence of clinical relevance in the near future.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Warfarin

The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet agents, vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify clinical trials comparing antiplatelet drugs with VKA and NOACs or their combination in AF patients undergoing PCI with a mean/median follow-up of at least 12 months. A network meta-analysis was conducted to directly and indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of competitive antithrombotic regimens with a Bayesian random-effects model. Results were presented as relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. A total of 15 studies enrolling 13,104 patients were included. Among 5 regimens, rivaroxaban 15 mg daily plus P2Y12 inhibitor treatment demonstrated significant superiority over dual- and triple-antiplatelet therapies (DAPT, TT) in reducing thromboembolic events (0.64 [0.38, 0.95] and 0.68 [0.43, 0.98], respectively) but showed the maximum possibility of major bleeding risk, while VKA plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) seemed the safest. Significantly less risk of major bleeding was seen in DAPT group than that in TT group (0.63 [0.39, 0.99]).. The present study suggests that combination of VKA and SAPT is the best choice for AF patients undergoing PCI considering both efficacy and safety. Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus DAPT treatment owns the highest probability to be the optimal alternative to VKA plus SAPT for these patients.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Databases, Factual; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk; Rivaroxaban

The purpose of this review was to offer practical management strategies for when patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants require elective surgery or present with bleeding complications.. Clinical practice guidelines are now available on the timing of periprocedural interruption of treatment with the newer direct oral anticoagulants based on their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics and based on findings from cohort studies and clinical trials. An antibody that reverses the effects of dabigatran is now available, and a factor Xa decoy is being developed as an antidote to apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. The timing of interruption of direct oral anticoagulants for elective surgery is based on multiple factors, including pharmacologic properties and interactions, the patient's renal function, and the type of planned surgery. There is little role for low-molecular-weight heparin bridging. Idarucizumab is the treatment of choice for dabigatran-related life-threatening bleeding, while andexanet alfa is being developed to reverse factor Xa inhibitors.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Benzamides; Blood Loss, Surgical; Dabigatran; Deprescriptions; Elective Surgical Procedures; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), which is more prevalent among CKD patients than the general population. AF causes stroke or systemic embolism, leading to increased mortality. The conventional antithrombotic prophylaxis agent warfarin is often prescribed for the prevention of stroke, but risk of bleeding necessitates regular therapeutic monitoring. Recently developed direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are expected to be useful as alternatives to warfarin.. To assess the efficacy and safety of DOAC including apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin among AF patients with CKD.. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register (up to 1 August 2017) through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Specialised Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (direct thrombin inhibitors or factor Xa inhibitors) with dose-adjusted warfarin for preventing stroke and systemic embolic events in non-valvular AF patients with CKD, defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl) or eGFR between 15 and 60 mL/min (CKD stage G3 and G4).. Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed quality, and extracted data. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between anticoagulant therapy and all strokes and systemic embolic events as the primary efficacy outcome and major bleeding events as the primary safety outcome. Confidence in the evidence was assessing using GRADE.. Our review included 12,545 AF participants with CKD from five studies. All participants were randomised to either DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) or dose-adjusted warfarin. Four studies used a central, interactive, automated response system for allocation concealment while the other did not specify concealment methods. Four studies were blinded while the other was partially open-label. However, given that all studies involved blinded evaluation of outcome events, we considered the risk of bias to be low. We were unable to create funnel plots due to the small number of studies, thwarting assessment of publication bias. Study duration ranged from 1.8 to 2.8 years. The large majority of participants included in this study were CKD stage G3 (12,155), and a small number were stage G4 (390). Of 12,545 participants from five studies, a total of 321 cases (2.56%) of the primary efficacy outcome occurred per year. Further, of 12,521 participants from five studies, a total of 617 cases (4.93%) of the primary safety outcome occurred per year. DOAC appeared to probably reduce the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism events (5 studies, 12,545 participants: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.00; moderate certainty evidence) and to slightly reduce the incidence of major bleeding events (5 studies, 12,521 participants: RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.04; low certainty evidence) in comparison with warfarin.. Our findings indicate that DOAC are as likely as warfarin to prevent all strokes and systemic embolic events without increasing risk of major bleeding events among AF patients with kidney impairment. These findings should encourage physicians to prescribe DOAC in AF patients with CKD without fear of bleeding. The major limitation is that the results of this study chiefly reflect CKD stage G3. Application of the results to CKD stage G4 patients requires additional investigation. Furthermore, we could not assess CKD stage G5 patients. Future reviews should assess participants at more advanced CKD stages. Additionally, we could not conduct detailed analyses of subgroups and sensitivity analyses due to lack of data.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), also referred to as novel (or non-vitamin K antagonist) oral anticoagulants (NOACs), represent a major development in anticoagulation therapy due to their rapid onset of action, predictable dose-response with fixed doses and limited interactions with food and drugs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Currently, little evidence is available on the length and type of anticoagulation used for extended treatment for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with unprovoked VTE who have completed initial oral anticoagulation therapy.. To compare the efficacy and safety of available oral therapeutic options (aspirin, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)) for extended thromboprophylaxis in adults with a first unprovoked VTE, to prevent VTE recurrence after completion of an acceptable initial oral anticoagulant treatment period, as defined in individual studies.. For this review, the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist (CIS) searched the Specialised Register (March 2017) as well as the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 2). We also searched trials registries (March 2017) and reference lists of relevant articles.. We included randomised controlled trials in which patients with a first, symptomatic, objectively confirmed, unprovoked VTE, who had been initially treated with anticoagulants, were randomised to extended prophylaxis (vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), antiplatelet agents, or DOACs) versus no prophylaxis or placebo. We also included trials that compared one type of extended prophylaxis versus another type of extended prophylaxis.. Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed quality, and extracted data. We resolved disagreements by discussion.. Six studies with a combined total of 3436 participants met the inclusion criteria. Five studies compared extended prophylaxis versus placebo: three compared warfarin versus placebo, and two compared aspirin versus placebo. One study compared one type of extended prophylaxis (rivaroxaban) versus another type of extended prophylaxis (aspirin). For extended prophylaxis versus placebo, we downgraded the quality of the evidence for recurrent VTE and all-cause mortality to moderate owing to concerns arising from risks of selection and performance bias in individual studies. For all other outcomes in this review, we downgraded the quality of the evidence to low owing to concerns arising from risk of bias for the studies stated above, combined with concerns over imprecision. For extended prophylaxis versus other extended prophylaxis, we downgraded the quality of the evidence for recurrent VTE and major bleeding to moderate owing to concerns over imprecision. Risk of bias in the individual study was low.Meta-analysis showed that extended prophylaxis was no more effective than placebo in preventing VTE-related mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 6.98; 1862 participants; 4 studies; P = 0.98; low-quality evidence), recurrent VTE (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.03; 2043 participants; 5 studies; P = 0.07; moderate-quality evidence), major bleeding (OR 1.84, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.85; 2043 participants; 5 studies; P = 0.86; low-quality evidence), all-cause mortality (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.57; 2043 participants; 5 studies; P = 0.99; moderate-quality evidence), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.59 to 5.33; 1672 participants; 4 studies; P = 0.30; low-quality evidence), stroke (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.46; 1224 participants; 2 studies; P = 0.80; low-quality evidence), or myocardial infarction (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.87; 1495 participants; 3 studies; P = 1.00; low-quality evidence).One study showed that the novel oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban was associated with fewer recurrent VTEs than aspirin (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.54; 1389 participants; P = 0.0001; moderate-quality evidence). Data show no clear differences in the incidence of major bleeding between rivaroxaban and aspirin (OR 3.06, 95% CI 0.37 to 25.51; 1389 participants; P = 0.30; moderate-quality evidence) nor in the incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.94; 1389 participants; 1 study; P = 0.69; moderate-quality evidenc. Evidence is currently insufficient to permit definitive conclusions concerning the effectiveness and safety of extended thromboprophylaxis in prevention of recurrent VTE after initial oral anticoagulation therapy among participants with unprovoked VTE. Additional good-quality large-scale randomised controlled trials are required before firm conclusions can be reached.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

In this review we present comparison of pharmacokinetics of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, principles of selection of a regimen of their dosing for phase III clinical trials in patients with atrial fibrillation. Multiplicity of administration of NOAC depends on required level of anticoagulation, ability to maintain anticoagulation for 24 hours, relationship between minimal and maximal levels of equilibrium concentrations, efficacy and safety. Once a day administration of some drugs of this group is reasonable from positions of clinical pharmacology. It can provide not only better adherence to treatment but greater safety relative to development of bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Despite the information provided by clinical trials is important, there are relevant clinical differences between those patients included in clinical trials and data of daily outpatient clinics. As a result, in some cases, the results of randomized clinical trials could not be directly applied to clinical practice. In this context, to perform «real-life» registries is mandatory. In the ROCKET-AF study, rivaroxaban, a once-daily direct oral anticoagulant, was at least as effective as warfarin for preventing stroke or systemic embolism, with similar rates of major bleeding, but with a lesser risk of intracranial, critical and fatal bleedings. In the last years, different large registries have confirmed that rivaroxaban is effective and even safer in real-life patients than in ROCKET-AF. The aim of this review is to update the current evidence about the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in real-life patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The majority of patients with atrial fibrillation should receive oral anticoagulation to reduce the risk of stroke. The limitations of vitamin K antagonists have led to an underuse of anticoagulants in clinical practice which has been associated with a higher risk of stroke, hospitalizations and healthcare costs. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) overcome some of the limitations of vitamin K antagonists and may therefore increase the use of oral anticoagulants in clinical practice. Since no head-to-head trials have been performed, only indirect comparisons can be made among them. In this review, the results of the Phase III randomized controlled trials with DOACs were analyzed, trying to determine whether one or more DOACs could be especially recommended according to different clinical conditions.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and potentially fatal complication of arthroplasty.. We reviewed randomized trials to determine which anticoagulant has the best safety and efficacy in hip and knee arthroplasty patients. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE through January 2016.. Compared to enoxaparin (most commonly dosed 40 mg once daily), the relative risk (RR) of VTE was lowest for edoxaban 30 mg once daily (0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.75), fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily (0.53; 95% CI, 0.45-0.63), and rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily (0.55; 95% CI, 0.46-0.66), and highest for dabigatran 150 mg once daily (1.19; 95% CI; 0.98-1.44). The RR of major/clinically relevant bleeding was lowest for apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily (0.84; 95% CI; 0.70-0.99) and highest for rivaroxaban (1.27; 95% CI, 1.01-1.59) and fondaparinux (1.64; 95% CI, 0.24-11.35). Fondaparinux was the only agent that was more effective than enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily (VTE RR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.76).. With the possible exception of apixaban, newer anticoagulants that lower the risk of postoperative VTE increase bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Polysaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

The available clinical data on target-specific oral anticoagulant (TSOAC) reversal agents that are currently in development or have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are reviewed.. The development of TSOACs such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban has presented benefits and new challenges. One of the main challenges associated with the use of TSOACs is the lack of suitable agent-specific reversal agents. Several treatment options for the management of life-threatening bleeding events associated with TSOAC use, such as fresh frozen plasma, prothrombin complex concentrates, and recombinant coagulation factor VIIa, have been used, with inconsistent results. Currently, two potential reversal agents for oral direct factor Xa inhibitors (andexanet alfa and ciraparantag) are at various stages of clinical development. Idarucizumab, a reversal agent for the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, was approved by FDA in October 2015. Idarucizumab and andexanet alfa have been reported to produce anticoagulation reversal effects within minutes of administration. Ciraparantag was demonstrated to decrease whole blood clotting time to within 10% of baseline values in 10 minutes or less, with a return to baseline hemostasis in 10-30 minutes. TSOAC reversal agents have been generally well tolerated in clinical trials.. Idarucizumab and other TSOAC reversal agents, such as andexanet alfa and ciraparantag, present the potential for consistent and effective treatment and management options when life-threatening or uncontrolled TSOAC-associated bleeding occurs or when emergency surgery is warranted in patients using TSOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Drug Evaluation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ranks the most prevailing type of cardiac rhythm disorder and AF patients are associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke compared to others. This study is designed to assess the relative efficacy of several clinical events prevention anticoagulants in patients with AF. Conventional pairwise meta-analysis was performed with fixed-effect model initially, then network meta-analysis was performed with random-effects model within results illustrated by cumulative odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% credible interval (CrI). The rank probabilities of each treatment outcomes were summarized by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). We conducted a systematic review and collected key clinical data from 37 studies with respect to 5 anticoagulant treatments for AF. Patients treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban are associated with a reduced risk of stroke compared to those treated with warfarin (OR 0.72, 95% CrI 0.53 to 0.88; OR 0.68, 95% CrI 0.48 to 0.91). Rivaroxaban (SUCRA = 0.712) appears to be the most preferable one with respect to vascular events, and both apixaban (SUCRA = 0.720) and rivaroxaban (SUCRA = 0.678) are preferable to others with respect to stroke. Dabigatran outperforms others with respect to the outcome of mortality (SUCRA = 0.695), hemorrhage events (SUCRA = 0.747), and myocardial infarction (SUCRA = 0.620). In conclusion, dabigatran has a noticeable and comprehensive advantage compared to others with respect to preventing several complications including hemorrhage events, myocardial infarction, and mortality. In addition, apixaban may be the best choice of preventing stroke, and rivaroxaban is more preferable to others with respect to preventing vascular events.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Warfarin is commonly used as a secondary prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, limitations have been observed even with the use of this medication. Recently, several newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for use by the food and drug administrations. Unfortunately, these newer drugs have seldom been compared directly with each other. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the bleeding events associated with rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients treated for non-valvular AF.. EMBASE, Medline (National Library of Medicine) and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials were searched for studies comparing rivaroxaban with dabigatran using the terms 'rivaroxaban, dabigatran and atrial fibrillation'. Primary endpoints were: any bleeding outcomes, intracranial bleeding and gastro-intestinal (GI) bleeding. Secondary outcomes included stroke/systemic embolism (SE)/transient ischemic attack (TIA), venous thromboembolism and mortality. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The pooled analyses were carried out with RevMan 5.3 software. All the authors had full access to the data and approved the manuscript as written.. A total number of 4895 patients were included. This analysis showed that rivaroxaban was not associated with a significantly higher bleeding event when compared to dabigatran (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.95-1.72; P = 0.11). GI bleeding was similarly manifested between these two DOACs (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.43-2.25; P = 0.97). Even if intracranial bleeding was higher with the use of rivaroxaban, (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 0.51-9.25; P = 0.29), the result was not statistically significant. Moreover, stroke/SE/TIA and venous thromboembolism were also not significantly different (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.53-1.23; P = 0.32) and (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 0.73-5.82; P = 0.17) respectively. However, even if mortality favored dabigatran (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.99-2.06; P = 0.06), this result only approached statistical significance.. Head to head comparison showed that rivaroxaban was not associated with significantly higher bleeding events compared to dabigatran. Intracranial bleeding, GI bleeding, stroke/SE/TIA, venous thromboembolism and mortality were also not significantly different between these two DOACs. However, due to the limited number of patients analyzed, and which were mainly obtained from observational studies, this hypothesis might only be confirmed in future randomized trials. Furthermore, the CHADS

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Global Health; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

The non-vitamin K antagonists (NOAC) are an integral component of our antithrombotic prevention and therapy. For four of the NOAC, their non-inferiority or even superiority versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) has been proven. Thus, the management of special patient cohorts or the management of active bleeding complications is a focus of current discussion.In addition to prospective trials, numerous retrospective analyses of health insurers or public health provider data have been analyzed and published as "real life" or "real-world evidence" data. In almost all data sets the results of the NOAC approval trials were confirmed, demonstrating their non-inferiority or even superiority versus VKA. Attempts to compare the various NOAC with each other must be viewed critically since the real-world evidence (RWE) analysis provides very divergent results depending on the cohorts analyzed. Thus, a substantial prescriber-bias must be taken into account and never be excluded.In order to improve the management of bleeding complications, NOAC antidotes were developed. While the factors Xa antidote, andexanet alpha, a modified coagulation factor deleted of an intrinsic activity, will not be available before 2018, the dabigatran antidote idarucizumab is already in clinical use. Idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment directed against dabigatran, is able to completely antagonize the effect of dabigatran within minutes. Therefore, the drug has the potential to terminate life-threatening bleeding complications earlier and make emergency surgical or interventional procedures possible without an elevated bleeding risk.

Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective in preventing and treating venous thromboembolism, and preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation. Until recently, there has been no specific reversal agent for DOACs. Now, a specific antidote for the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran has been approved for use, and antidotes for factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) are being developed. We review the evidence for currently used and emerging reversal strategies, and discuss possible clinical implications, including increased prescription of DOACs, use of DOACs in clinical situations previously felt to pose too great a risk of bleeding, and use of reversal agents beyond currently approved indications.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Arginine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. In phase III clinical trials that included more than 100,000 patients, the DOACs were at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and were associated with less serious bleeding, particularly less intracranial bleeding. Real-world evidence supports these outcomes. Despite this, some physicians and patients are concerned about serious bleeding or emergencies unless specific reversal agents for the DOACs are available. However, in clinical trials performed without reversal agents, the outcome of major bleeds was similar or better in patients receiving DOACs than in those taking VKAs. Because of their short half-lives, supportive measures are sufficient to manage most bleeds in patients receiving DOACs. Anticoagulant reversal should only be considered with life-threatening bleeds, with bleeds that fail to respond to usual measures and in patients requiring urgent surgery. Idarucizumab is licensed for dabigatran reversal and andexanet alfa is likely to be soon licensed for reversal of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. To ensure responsible use of these agents, every hospital needs a bleeding management algorithm that identifies patients eligible for reversal and outlines appropriate dosing regimens.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Forecasting; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Current evidence indicates that heart failure (HF) confers a hyper-coagulable state that is associated with adverse events including stroke, systemic embolism, and mortality. This may be due to the elevated levels of pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory cytokines that are seen in patients with acute and chronic HF. Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in patients with systolic dysfunction predispose to local thrombosis due to blood stasis as does atrial fibrillation (AF) which leads to blood stasis in regions of the atria. The high risk of thromboemboli in HF patients with AF has resulted in the use anticoagulation therapy to prevent the occurrence of catastrophic events. There is evidence, however, that the pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic state that exists in HF puts patients who are in sinus rhythm at risk. The novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown in RCT to have at least equivalent efficacy in reducing stroke as warfarin while exposing patients to a lower risk of bleeding. The fact that the NOACs don't require routine monitoring to assure that patients remain within the therapeutic range and have relatively simple dosing requirements and a safer risk profile makes them attractive substitutes to warfarin in HF patients with atrial fibrillation and other conditions (e.g. deep venous thrombosis). Post hoc analyses from a subset of HF patients from the RCTs in AF patients have demonstrated similar findings as were reported in the entire populations that were included in the trials. As a result, NOACS are commonly used now in HF patients with AF. For HF patients with reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm, the use of warfarin in randomized clinical trials (RCT) to reduce stroke has been disappointing and associated with increase bleeding risk when compared to aspirin. The advantages of the NOACs over warfarin, however, raise the question of whether they might improve outcomes in HF patients who are in sinus rhythm. The currently ongoing COMMANDER-HF trial has been designed to address this issue. In this chapter we review evidence of existence of a prothombotic state in HF, the pharmacodynamics and clinical trials of the NOACs and the outcomes from NOAC substudies in the HF subgroup. We also discuss the rationale for using anticoagulation in HF independent of arrhythmia burden.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban, a new oral anticoagulant, has been approved in many countries and its everyday use in clinical practice is increasing. Thus, the chances for an emergency physician to encounter rivaroxaban-treated patients in emergency situations have increased. Here, the authors address the main issues in terms of the prescription of rivaroxaban and the management of these patients in cases of minor or major bleeding, urgent surgery, atrial fibrillation requiring cardioversion, acute ischemic stroke, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and new onset of atrial fibrillation in recent ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The recommendations reached are based on a literature review and a panel discussion of the advisory board of SIMEU, the Italian Society of Emergency Medicine.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Drug Substitution; Emergency Service, Hospital; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thromboembolism

Emergency physicians make treatment decisions in patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). They also encounter patients on target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) who require urgent intervention. New approvals and increasing prescriptions for TSOACs (e.g., apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) for the management of several thromboembolic disorders warrant an evaluation of the impact of these agents in the ED setting.. This review discusses the use of TSOACs in the ED for the treatment of acute VTE, and highlights strategies for the management of patients on TSOACs who present to the ED with other complications, such as bleeding complications or requiring emergency surgery.. Apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban have been approved for the treatment of acute VTE. We discuss the impact of this on ED management of TSOAC-naïve patients and highlight results with TSOACs in high-risk subgroups including the elderly and those with prior VTE or active cancer. This review also discusses management strategies for patients on TSOACs. For emergency physicians, strategies for the management of bleeding, approaches to patient care when emergency surgery is needed, laboratory assays for measuring plasma concentrations of TSOACs, and drug-drug interactions are of special importance.. Familiarity with TSOACs will better position emergency physicians to provide state-of-the art care to their patients with VTE and help them manage potentially complicated circumstances related to the chronic use of these drugs.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Emergency Service, Hospital; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Stroke is the most serious clinical consequence of atrial fibrillation, which is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as efficacious, safe and convenient stroke prevention agents. This updated network meta-analysis focused on the relative efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with dabigatran, rivaroxaban and edoxaban for stroke prevention in (i) patients with CHADS2 score ≥ 2, (ii) secondary stroke prevention, and (iii) patients with high quality anticoagulation control with warfarin.. A fixed-effects network meta-analysis was conducted, including data from four Phase III randomised controlled trials (> 70,000 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation). The results of the base-case analysis comparing NOACs with warfarin were broadly in line with the results from the individual trials. Results from the three subgroup analyses were broadly similar to the base case results. For example in patients with CHADS2 score ≥ 2, apixaban, high-dose dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and high-dose edoxaban had significantly lower hazards of stroke/systemic embolism compared with low-dose edoxaban. Apixaban and low-dose edoxaban were associated with significantly lower hazards of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban and dabigatran 150 mg. However, several treatment comparisons that were significant in the base-case analysis were not significant in the patient subgroups, due to the reduced sample size of the subgroups compared with the overall population.. Among the NOACs, apixaban offered the most favourable efficacy and safety profile in the overall patient population as well as in the three subgroups investigated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Vitamin K

Despite widespread diffusion of pharmacological prophylaxis, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is still a common cause of morbidity after major orthopedic surgery (total hip replacement--THR--and total knee replacement--TKR). At present, clear evidence has been provided that pharmacological primary prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of venous thromboembolism. The main limitation of LMWH prophylaxis however is the need for parenteral administration with a not negligible drop-out of treatment. Newer oral anticoagulants (NAOs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixiban and edoxaban may be valid alternatives in elective surgery. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of NAOs after THR and TKR. The research for new compounds and their antidote is under continuous development Aim of this paper was to review the indications and clinical results of DVT prophylaxis with NAO in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Orthopedic Procedures; Polysaccharides; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

To report 3 cases of subdural bleeding associated with rivaroxaban managed by 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC3).. Case 1 presented with a 1-cm thick subdural hematoma (SDH) 12 hours after her last dose of rivaroxaban. Case 2 presented with a right 1-cm acute right SDH with 2 to 3 mm of midline shift 24 hours after his last dose of rivaroxaban. Case 3 presented with a 1.8-cm thick right cerebral convexity hematoma 12 hours after her last dose of rivaroxaban. All patients received 23 to 35 units/kg PCC3 with 1 to 3 units of fresh frozen plasm (FFP) and demonstrated no progression in lesions measured by repeat computed tomography (CT). Two patients were discharged to rehabilitation facilities and 1 patient ultimately died due to the location of the lesion.. Rivaroxaban has no specific antidote. Current bleeding management strategies are based on expert opinion. The risks and benefits for differing strategies are unclear, and no clinical experience has been reported to date. These cases begin to illuminate differences among choices for managing bleeding associated with Xa inhibitors.. In this case series, 25 to 35 units/kilogram PCC3 and FFP 1 to 3 units ceased rivaroxaban-associated bleeding without thrombogenic complications.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Blood Coagulation Factors; Disease Management; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hematoma, Subdural; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban is increasingly used in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). In the absence of large controlled trials, a comprehensive meta-analysis of the literature appears to be the best way to obtain reliable evidence on rare peri-procedural outcomes such as thromboembolic or bleeding events. We aimed to provide a detailed analysis of currently available data on safety and efficacy of peri-procedural rivaroxaban in patients undergoing AF ablation. We performed a systematic search of the English language literature for studies comparing peri-procedural rivaroxaban therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and reporting detailed data on bleeding and/or thromboembolic complications. The Peto odds ratio (POR) was used to pool data into a fixed-effect meta-analysis. A total of 7400 patients undergoing catheter ablation were included in 15 observational and 1 randomized studies of which 1994 were receiving rivaroxaban and 5406 VKA. The risk of thromboembolism trended to be lower in the rivaroxaban group [4/1954 vs. 19/5219, POR 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16-1.01, P = 0.052]. Major bleeding events occurred in 23 of 1994 cases (1.15%) in the rivaroxaban and 90 of 5406 (1.66%) in the VKA group (POR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.46-1.21, P = 0.23). A total of 87 minor bleeding events were reported in 1753 patients (4.96%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 165 of 4009 patients (4.12%) in the VKA group (POR 0.84, 95% CI 0.63-1.11, p = 0.22). In patients undergoing AF ablation, rivaroxaban appears to be an effective and safe alternative to VKA.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Catheter Ablation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

To assess the cost-effectiveness of apixaban versus rivaroxaban, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)/dabigatran, and LMWH/vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for the initial treatment and prevention of recurrent thromboembolic events in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE).. A Markov model was developed to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic effect of 6 months of treatment with apixaban versus other anticoagulants over a lifetime horizon. Network meta-analyses were conducted using the results of the Apixaban after the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis with First-Line Therapy (AMPLIFY), EINSTEIN-pooled, and RE-COVER I and II trials for the following end points: recurrent VTE, major bleeds, clinically relevant non-major bleeds, and treatment discontinuations. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the United Kingdom National Health Service. The outcomes evaluated were the number of events avoided in a 1000-patient cohort, total costs, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost per QALY gained over a patient's lifetime.. Treatment for 6 months with apixaban was projected to result in fewer recurrent VTE and bleeding events in comparison to rivaroxaban, LMWH/dabigatran, and LMWH/VKA. Apixaban was cost-effective compared with LMWH/VKA at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2520 per QALY gained and was a dominant (ie, lower costs and higher QALYs) alternative to either rivaroxaban or LMWH/dabigatran. Sensitivity analysis indicated that results were robust over a wide range of inputs.. The assessment of the effects and costs of apixaban in this study predicted that apixaban is a dominant alternative to rivaroxaban and LMWH/dabigatran and a cost-effective alternative to LMWH/VKA for 6 months of treatment of VTE and the prevention of recurrence.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; United Kingdom; Venous Thromboembolism

Numerous real-world studies estimating major bleeding rates in rivaroxaban patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have been published. We performed a meta-analysis to better quantify the rates of different types of major bleeding seen with rivaroxaban in observational studies. The pooled rates of major bleeding with rivaroxaban were generally low and consistent with those reported in its pivotal randomized controlled trial.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

This article emphasizes the differentiated management of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)-associated bleeding in trauma patients to generate a severity adjusted treatment protocol.. The management of DOAC-associated bleeding should take severity, mortality risk, and haemodynamic effects of the trauma-induced bleeding into account.. The different pharmacological properties of DOACs are important for the management of trauma-induced bleeding. Comorbidities like renal impairment and liver dysfunction prolong their half-life. Patients with minor bleeding in stable clinical condition can be managed by a 'wait and see' approach. Moderate bleeding is suggested to be managed by a primarily conservative approach. In life-threatening bleeding, the administration of activated or nonactivated factor concentrates seems justified, together with supportive measures as part of an advanced management protocol. The administration of specific antidotes may be an alternative in the future. A monoclonal antibody to dabigatran (idarucizumab) has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration, whereas antidotes to Factor X activated inhibitors (andexanet and aripazine) are still under development. Sufficiently powered studies with clinical and safety outcome measures are still missing for all specific antidotes at this time.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Protocols; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Plasma; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; United States; Wounds and Injuries

Only vitamin K antagonists could be applied as oral anticoagulants over the past six decades. Coumarols have narrow therapeutic range, and unpredictable anticoagulant effects are resulted by multiple drug interactions. Therefore, regular routine monitoring of the international normalized ratio is necessary. There are two groups of factor-specific anticoagulants: molecules with anti-FIIa (dabigatran) and anti-FXa (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) effect. Author summarizes the most important clinical features of the new oral anticoagulants, their indications and the possibilities of laboratory controls. Bleedings are the most important side effects of anticoagulants. This review summarizes the current published evidences for new oral anticoagulants reversal (non-specific and specific) agents, especially in cases with severe acute bleedings or urgent surgery procedures. It reports on how to use inhibitors, the recommended doses and the most important clinical results. The review focuses on idarucizumab - already approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency - which has a key role as the first specific inhibitor of dabigatran.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Ambulatory Care; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thiazoles

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most widespread severe complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We conducted this meta-analysis to further validate the benefits and harms of rivaroxaban use for thromboprophylaxis after THA or TKA. We thoroughly searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was applied to test the robustness of our findings and to obtain a more conservative estimation. Of 316 articles screened, nine studies were included. Compared with enoxaparin, rivaroxaban significantly reduced symptomatic VTE (P = 0.0001) and symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT; P = 0.0001) but not symptomatic pulmonary embolism (P = 0.57). Furthermore, rivaroxaban was not associated with an increase in all-cause mortality, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and postoperative wound infection. However, the findings were accompanied by an increase in major bleeding (P = 0.02). The TSA demonstrated that the cumulative z-curve crossed the traditional boundary but not the trial sequential monitoring boundary and did not reach the required information size for major bleeding. Rivaroxaban was more beneficial than enoxaparin for preventing symptomatic DVT but increased the risk of major bleeding. According to the TSA results, more evidence is needed to verify the risk of major bleeding with rivaroxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Gender differences have been reported in patients with acute VTE treated with antithrombotic drugs.. To address the relationship between gender and new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the incidence of recurrent VTE and major plus clinically relevant non-major bleedings in males and females, with acute VTE, treated with NOACs over the treatment period.. Systematic review and meta-analysis of double blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs).. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials (up to September 2015).. RCTs that compared the beneficial and harmful effects of NOAC drugs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban).. Three authors abstracted data. Study-specific risk ratios (RR) were combined using random-effects model.. Nine studies including 16,372 patients were selected. No significant difference for the incidence of recurrent VTE was found between men and women. Compared to men, women had a higher incidence of major bleedings plus clinically relevant minor bleedings (5.3% and 7.9% respectively; RR: 0.635; 95% CI: 0.54-0.74; p<0.001). The subgroup analysis showed a significant gender difference in incidence of major bleedings and clinically relevant minor bleedings only for Edoxaban (RR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.42-0.64; p<0.001).. This meta-analysis showed, compared to men, a higher risk of bleeding in women with acute VTE treated with NOACs. Future trials should evaluate the effect of gender on bleeding in patients with acute VTE treated with NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Sex Characteristics; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been developed in recent years and are increasingly used in clinical practice. Dabigatran is a direct thrombin (factor II) inhibitor while rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban are direct inhibitors of factor Xa. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) currently approves these NOACs for different clinical uses. NOACs do not require routine monitoring of coagulation although an assessment of anticoagulation activity in these patients may be required in different conditions. NOACs show a similar or lower incidence of bleeding compared with conventional therapies in phase III trials. In case of bleeding, non-specific reversal strategies are available while specific reversal agents are the subject of ongoing trials. The role of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on NOCAs focusing on bleeding management in the perioperative period.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban have gained a lot of popularity as alternatives to warfarin for anticoagulation in various clinical settings. However, there is conflicting opinion regarding the absolute benefit of NOAC use in elderly patients. Low body mass, altered body composition of fat and muscle, renal impairment and concurrent presence of multiple comorbidities predispose elderly patients to many adverse effects with NOACs that are typically not seen in younger patients. There have been reports that NOAC use, in particular dabigatran, is associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly. Diagnosis and management of NOAC-associated bleeding in the elderly is difficult due to the absence of commonly available drug-specific antidotes that can rapidly reverse the anticoagulant effects. Moreover, in elderly patients, a number of factors such as the presence of other comorbid medical conditions, renal insufficiency, drug interactions from polypharmacy, risk of falls and dementia need to be considered before prescribing anticoagulation therapy. Elderly patients frequently have compromised renal function, and therefore dose adjustments according to creatinine clearance for NOACs need to be made. As each NOAC comes with its own unique advantages and safety profile, an individualized case by case approach should be adopted to decide on the appropriate anticoagulation regimen for elderly patients after weighing the overall risks and benefits of therapy.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Precision Medicine; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The goal of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of individual antiembolic interventions in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF): novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban); vitamin K antagonists (VKA); aspirin; and the Watchman device.. A network meta-analysis of randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) was performed. RCTs that included patients with prosthetic cardiac valves or mitral stenosis, mean or median follow-up <6 months, <200 participants, without published report in English language, and NOAC phase II studies were excluded. The placebo/control arm received either placebo or no treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the combination of stroke (of any type) and systemic embolism. All-cause mortality served as a secondary efficacy outcome. The primary safety outcome was the combination of major extracranial bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 21 RCTs (96 017 nonvalvular AF patients; median age, 72 years; 65% males; median follow-up, 1.7 years) were included. In comparison to placebo/control, use of aspirin (odds ratio [OR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60-0.95]), VKA (0.38 [0.29-0.49]), apixaban (0.31 [0.22-0.45]), dabigatran (0.29 [0.20-0.43]), edoxaban (0.38 [0.26-0.54]), rivaroxaban (0.27 [0.18-0.42]), and the Watchman device (0.36 [0.16-0.80]) significantly reduced the risk of any stroke or systemic embolism in nonvalvular AF patients, as well as all-cause mortality (aspirin: OR, 0.82 [0.68-0.99]; VKA: 0.69 [0.57-0.85]; apixaban: 0.62 [0.50-0.78]; dabigatran: 0.62 [0.50-0.78]; edoxaban: 0.62 [0.50-0.77]; rivaroxaban: 0.58 [0.44-0.77]; and the Watchman device: 0.47 [0.25-0.88]). Apixaban (0.89 [0.80-0.99]), dabigatran (0.90 [0.82-0.99]), and edoxaban (0.89 [0.82-0.96]) reduced risk of all-cause death as compared to VKA.. The entire spectrum of therapy to prevent thromboembolism in nonvalvular AF significantly reduced stroke/systemic embolism events and mortality.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

The phase III non-vitamin K dependent oral anticoagulants (NOAC) studies and recently published real world data on the use of dabigatran and rivaroxaban have shown that the bleeding profile in particular of intracranial and other life-threatening bleeding of NOAC is more favourable than that of warfarin. In case of a bleeding complication in a patient treated with a NOAC the recently updated EHRA practical guide offers management strategies. Idarucizumab, the specific antidot for dabigatran is approved to reverse the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran-treated patients who have serious bleeding and require an urgent procedure. Andexanet alfa, a specific antidot for direct and indirect factor Xa-inhibitors will be available in the future. The frequency of thrombocytopenia in ICU patients is high whereas the heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) only counts for a small minority of patients with thrombocytopenia. To avoid an overdiagnosis of HIT a reliable and complete clinical and laboratory workup has to be performed. New immunoassays have been developed to provide results within a short period of time. These tests appear to have improved diagnostic accuracy compared with ELISAs in patients with suspected HIT and may reduce misdiagnosis and overtreatment. Acquired haemophilia (AH) is a rare and often life threatening bleeding disorder caused by autoantibodies against factor VIII. Susoctocog alfa is a B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII porcine sequence that has recently been approved to treat severe bleeding in patients with AH. Susoctocog alfa offers the ability to effectively titrate and monitor dosing based on factor VIII activity levels.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemophilia A; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Rivaroxaban; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Half of all patients with acute venous thromboembolism are aged over 70 years; they then face the added hazard of an age-related increase in the incidence of major bleeding. This makes it even more important to weigh the balance of benefit and risk when considering anticoagulant treatment and treatment duration. Traditional treatment with a heparin (usually low molecular weight) followed by a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin is effective but is often complicated, especially in the elderly. The direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), i.e. the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, are given in fixed doses, do not need laboratory monitoring, have fewer drug-drug interactions and are therefore much easier to take. Randomised trials, their meta-analyses and 'real-world' data indicate the DOACs are no less effective than warfarin (are non-inferior) and probably cause less major bleeding (especially intracranial). It seems the relative safety of DOACs extends to age above 65 or 70 years, although bleeding becomes more likely regardless of the chosen anticoagulant. Renal impairment, comorbidities (especially cancer) and interventions are special hazards. Ways to minimise bleeding include patient selection and follow-up, education about venous thromboembolism, anticoagulants, drug interactions, regular checks on adherence and avoiding needlessly prolonged treatment. The relatively short circulating half-lives of DOACs mean that time, local measures and supportive care are the main response to major bleeding. They also simplify the management of invasive interventions. An antidote for dabigatran, idarucizumab, was recently approved by regulators, and a general antidote for factor Xa inhibitors is in advanced development.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are proven alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, there are few data on the efficacy and safety of NOAC therapy after cardioversion, where the risk of thromboembolic events is heightened.. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of patients who underwent both electrical and pharmacologic cardioversion for atrial fibrillation in the RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, ARISTOTLE, ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, and X-VeRT trials. We assessed Mantel-Haenszel pooled estimates of risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding at ≤42 days of follow-up.. The analysis pooled 3949 patients in whom a total of 4900 cardioversions for atrial fibrillation were performed. Compared with VKAs, NOAC therapy was associated with a similar risk of stroke/systemic embolism (RR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.34-2.04) and major bleeding (RR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.52-2.42); no significant statistical heterogeneity was found among studies (Cochrane Q P = .59, I(2) = 0% for stroke/systemic embolism; P = .47; I(2) = 0% for major bleeding).. The short-term incidences of thromboembolic and major hemorrhagic events after cardioversion on NOACs were low and comparable to those observed on dose-adjusted VKA therapy. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are a reasonable alternative to VKAs in patients undergoing cardioversion.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Hemorrhage; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Nonvitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) are currently recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke. As a group, NOACs significantly reduce stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality, with lower to similar major bleeding rates compared with warfarin. All NOACs are dependent on the kidney for elimination, such that patients with creatinine clearance <25 ml/min were excluded from all the pivotal phase 3 NOAC trials. It therefore remains unclear how or if NOACs should be prescribed to patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and those on dialysis. The authors review the current pharmacokinetic, observational, and prospective data on NOACs in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min) and those on dialysis. The authors frame the evidence in terms of risk versus benefit to bring greater clarity to NOAC-related major bleeding and efficacy at preventing stroke specifically in patients with creatinine clearance <30 ml/min.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dabigatran; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists are commonly used by clinicians to provide anticoagulation to patients who have or are at risk of having thrombotic events. In addition to familiarity with the dosing and monitoring of vitamin K antagonists, clinicians are accustomed to using vitamin K if there is a need to reverse the anticoagulant effect of vitamin K antagonists. There are now 4 new non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) that are attractive alternatives to vitamin K antagonists. Despite similar or lower rates of serious bleeding with NOACs in comparison with warfarin, there is a pressing need for strategies to manage bleeding when it does occur with NOACs and to reverse the pharmacological effect of these agents if needed. Important steps in minimizing bleeding risks with NOACs include dose adjustment of the agents in the setting of renal dysfunction and avoidance of the concomitant use of other antithrombotic agents if feasible. Laboratory measurement of the anticoagulant effect of NOACs is best accomplished with specialized assays, although some of the more widely available coagulation tests can provide information that is potentially useful to clinicians. Nonspecific hemostatic agents such as prothrombin complex concentrates and recombinant factor VIIa can be used to reverse the effect of NOACs. More specific reversing agents include the approved humanized monoclonal antibody fragment idarucizumab for reversing the effects of dabigatran, the investigational factor Xa decoy andexanet alfa, and the synthetic small molecule ciraparantag. Both andexanet and ciraparantag have been reported to reverse the effects of the anti-Xa NOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), and a number of other anticoagulant agents in common clinical use, as well.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antithrombins; Arginine; Blood Coagulation Factors; Dabigatran; Factor VIIa; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Piperazines; Plasma; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Recently, a new generation of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with a greater specificity towards activated coagulation factors was introduced based on encouraging results for efficacy and safety in clinical studies. An initial limitation of these new drugs was the absence of an adequate strategy to reverse the effect if a bleeding event occurs or an urgent invasive procedure has to be carried out.. Specific reversing agents for DOACs have become available, however, and are now evaluated in clinical studies. For the anti-factor Xa agents (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) a number of studies have shown that the administration of prothrombin complex concentrate resulted in a correction of the prolonged prothrombin time and restored depressed thrombin generation after rivaroxaban treatment in a controlled trial in healthy human subjects. In view of the relatively wide availability of prothrombin complex concentrates, this would be an interesting option if the results can be confirmed in patients on oral factor Xa inhibitors who present with bleeding complications. More specific reversal can be achieved with andexanet, a new agent currently in development that competitively binds to the anti-factor Xa agents. For the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, the administration of prothrombin complex concentrates showed variable results in various volunteer trials and efficacy at relatively high doses in animal studies. Recently, a Fab fragment of a monoclonal antibody (idarucizumab) was shown to be an effective reversal agent for dabigatran in human studies.. For the new generation of DOACs, several reversal strategies and specific antidotes are under evaluation, although most interventions need further evaluation in clinical trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Disease Management; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Prothrombin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a relatively recent addition to the oral anticoagulant armamentarium, and provide an alternative to the use of vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin. Regardless of the type of agent used, bleeding is the major complication of anticoagulant therapy. The decision to restart oral anticoagulation following a major hemorrhage in a previously anticoagulated patient is supported largely by retrospective studies rather than randomized clinical trials (mostly with vitamin K antagonists), and remains an issue of individualized clinical assessment: the patient's risk of thromboembolism must be balanced with the risk of recurrent major bleeding. This review provides guidance for clinicians regarding if and when a patient should be re-initiated on DOAC therapy following a major hemorrhage, based on the existing evidence.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been marketed in the United States since 2010. While numerous large-scale prospective phase 3 outcomes studies have documented the effectiveness of DOACs for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, the primary safety concern with all of these drugs-as it is with the more established oral anticoagulant warfarin-is the risk of major bleeding. Postmarketing surveillance studies (PMSS) provide the opportunity to evaluate the safety of these recently approved drugs across a spectrum of patients that may be broader than those included in randomized controlled trials. This review will summarize the safety findings of numerous recently performed, large-scale PMSS evaluations, and consider the currently available evidence regarding the risks for bleeding in patients treated with DOACs, in order to give providers and patients additional evidence regarding the safety of DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

As expected with all antithrombotic agents, there is a risk of bleeding complications in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) because of the DOAC itself, acute trauma, invasive procedures, or underlying comorbidities. For many bleeding events, a prudent course of action will be to withdraw the DOAC, then "wait and support" the patient, with the expectation that the bleeding event should resolve with time. Likewise, DOAC therapy may be interrupted ahead of a planned procedure, the stopping time being dependent on the agent involved and the patient's renal function. However, urgent reversal of anticoagulation is required in patients with serious or life-threatening bleeding or in those requiring urgent surgery or procedures. Novel specific reversal agents, either under development or recently approved, will need to be incorporated into local anticoagulation reversal protocols. For dabigatran-treated patients, idarucizumab recently has been approved for clinical use in cases of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding or when patients require emergency surgery or urgent procedures, both associated with a high risk of bleeding. As clinical experience with individual specific reversal agents grows, their roles in managing major bleeding events in DOAC-treated patients will become better defined. Future research, as well as ongoing use of idarucizumab, should help establish when it is appropriate to re-dose with idarucizumab, co-administer with prothrombin complex concentrates, or re-initiate DOAC after idarucizumab use. Ongoing trials should help identify the appropriate doses and expected durations of effect for andexanet alfa and ciraparantag, which are likely to vary depending on the individual oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Arginine; Blood Coagulation Factors; Clinical Protocols; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hospitals; Humans; Piperazines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban

Patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) who then need an emergency invasive procedure require specialized management strategies. Appropriate patient evaluation includes assessment of the current anticoagulation state, including timing of the last dose. DOACs require particular coagulation assays to measure anticoagulation levels accurately, although standard coagulation screening tests may provide qualitative guidance. Specialty societies have endorsed general recommendations for patient management to promote hemostasis in anticoagulated patients requiring surgery or other invasive procedures. These include general stopping rules (such as ≥24 hours for low-risk procedures and ≥48 hours for high-risk surgery with normal renal function) for elective procedures. Bridging therapy when oral anticoagulant treatment is interrupted has recently been questioned, depending on the clinical scenario. Novel agents for the reversal of DOAC-induced anticoagulation have recently been developed. Idarucizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody fragment that selectively binds dabigatran, was recently approved for clinical use in patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding, and for patients requiring emergency interventions. Idarucizumab can streamline the pre- and periprocedural anticoagulation management of dabigatran-treated patients, as it provides fast, complete, and sustainable reversibility. Andexanet alfa is an inactive, decoy factor Xa (FXa) molecule that binds FXa inhibitors, and ciraparantag is a synthetic molecule designed to bind fractionated and unfractionated heparins, and each of the currently approved DOACs. As clinical development of the additional anti-FXa-specific anticoagulant reversal agents proceeds, the respective role of each in the management of emergency bleeding events and invasive procedures will be better defined, and it is hoped they will make important contributions to patient care.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Arginine; Dabigatran; Deprescriptions; Emergencies; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Piperazines; Prothrombin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Surgical Procedures, Operative

Oral Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors, a growing class of direct-acting anticoagulants, are frequently used to prevent stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and to prevent and treat venous thromboembolism. These drugs reduce the risk of clotting at the expense of increasing the risk of bleeding, and currently they have no specific reversal agent. However, andexanet alfa, a recombinant modified FXa decoy molecule, is in a late-phase clinical trial in bleeding patients, and ciraparantag, a small molecule that appears to reverse many anticoagulants including the FXa inhibitors, is in development. This review summarizes the published data to date on both drugs, which have the potential to change the management approach to patients with FXa inhibitor-associated major hemorrhage.

Topics: Animals; Antidotes; Arginine; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

The risk of bleeding in the setting of anticoagulant therapy continues to be re-evaluated following the introduction of a new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Interruption of DOAC therapy and supportive care may be sufficient for the management of patients who present with mild or moderate bleeding, but in those with life-threatening bleeding, a specific reversal agent is desirable. We review the phase 3 clinical studies of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, in the context of bleeding risk and management.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) by a meta-analysis.. AF is quite prevalent in patients with HF.. Four phase III clinical trials comparing NOACs to warfarin in patients with AF were included. Each patient was defined as affected by HF according to the criteria of the trial in which the patient was enrolled. Pre-specified outcomes were the composite of stroke/systemic embolism (SSE); major, intracranial, and any bleeding; and cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause death.. A total of 55,011 patients were enrolled, 26,384 (48%) with HF, and 28,627 (52%) without HF; 27,518 receiving NOACs and 27,493 receiving warfarin (median, 70 years of age; 36% females; follow-up: 1.5 to 2.8 years). Rates of SSE (relative risk [RR]: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 1.07]; p = 0.68) and major bleeding (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.03; p = 0.21) were comparable in patients with and without HF. HF patients had reduced rates of any (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.91; p < 0.01) and intracranial (RR: 0.74 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.88; p < 0.01) bleeding but increased rates of all-cause (RR: 1.70 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.19; p < 0.01) and CV death (RR: 2.05 95% CI: 1.66 to 2.55; p < 0.01). NOACs, compared with warfarin significantly reduced SSE and major, intracranial, and any bleeding, regardless of the presence or absence of HF (p. Patients with AF and HF had increased mortality but reduced rates of intracranial and any bleeding compared with the no-HF patients, with no differences in rates of SSE and major bleeding. NOACs significantly reduced SSE, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage in HF patients. No interactions in efficacy and safety of NOACs were observed between AF patients with and without HF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Mortality; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The new direct oral anticoagulants-dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, and apixaban- have predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and are alternatives to warfarin. However, many surgeons are wary of these drugs, as there is limited evidence on how to manage bleeding in patients taking them, and only recently has a specific antidote been developed to reverse their anticoagulant effect. Management of the newer agents requires careful adherence to primary measures of bleeding care, knowledge of their mechanism of action, and familiarity with the unapproved and untested reversal strategies that may be required in patients with life-threatening bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis, Surgical; Humans; Oral Surgical Procedures; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

The risk of bleeding in the setting of anticoagulant therapy continues to be re-evaluated following the introduction of a new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Interruption of DOAC therapy and supportive care may be sufficient for the management of patients who present with mild or moderate bleeding, but in those with life-threatening bleeding, a specific reversal agent is desirable. We review the phase 3 clinical studies of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, in the context of bleeding risk and management.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

As expected with all antithrombotic agents, there is a risk of bleeding complications in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) because of the DOAC itself, acute trauma, invasive procedures, or underlying comorbidities. For many bleeding events, a prudent course of action will be to withdraw the DOAC, then "wait and support" the patient, with the expectation that the bleeding event should resolve with time. Likewise, DOAC therapy may be interrupted ahead of a planned procedure, the stopping time being dependent on the agent involved and the patient's renal function. However, urgent reversal of anticoagulation is required in patients with serious or life-threatening bleeding or in those requiring urgent surgery or procedures. Novel specific reversal agents, either under development or recently approved, will need to be incorporated into local anticoagulation reversal protocols. For dabigatran-treated patients, idarucizumab recently has been approved for clinical use in cases of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding or when patients require emergency surgery or urgent procedures, both associated with a high risk of bleeding. As clinical experience with individual specific reversal agents grows, their roles in managing major bleeding events in DOAC-treated patients will become better defined. Future research, as well as ongoing use of idarucizumab, should help establish when it is appropriate to re-dose with idarucizumab, coadminister with prothrombin complex concentrates, or re-initiate DOAC after idarucizumab use. Ongoing trials should help identify the appropriate doses and expected durations of effect for andexanet alfa and ciraparantag, which are likely to vary depending on the individual oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Clinical Protocols; Dabigatran; Emergency Treatment; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hospitals; Humans; Patient Selection; Piperazines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thiazoles

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been marketed in the United States since 2010. While numerous large-scale prospective phase 3 outcomes studies have documented the effectiveness of DOACs for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, the primary safety concern with all of these drugs-as it is with the more established oral anticoagulant warfarin-is the risk of major bleeding. Postmarketing surveillance studies (PMSS) provide the opportunity to evaluate the safety of these recently approved drugs across a spectrum of patients that may be broader than those included in randomized controlled trials. This review will summarize the safety findings of numerous recently performed, large-scale PMSS evaluations, and consider the currently available evidence regarding the risks for bleeding in patients treated with DOACs, in order to give providers and patients additional evidence regarding the safety of DOACs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

Among patients with atrial fibrillation, prophylaxis for stroke prevention with the use of anticoagulation is well established in the general population. A number of randomized controlled trials and evidence-based risk prediction tools clearly delineate the benefit and risks of therapy. Despite the high incidence of atrial fibrillation in the late stage CKD and ESRD populations, little high quality evidence exists in these populations. Is it appropriate then to extrapolate findings from the general population to those with CKD/ESRD? In our view, too much uncertainty exists regarding proof of efficacy with clear signals of harm. Routine anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is not recommended for the majority of CKD and ESRD patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have at least noninferior efficacy compared with other oral anticoagulants and have ancillary benefits, including overall better safety profiles, lack of the need for routine monitoring, rapid onset of action, and ease of administration. Reversal of these agents may be indicated in certain situations such as severe bleeding and for perioperative management. DOAC-associated bleeding should be risk stratified: patients with moderate or severe bleeding should have the DOAC discontinued and reversal strategies should be considered. Laboratory testing has limited utility in the acute management of bleeding; thrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time may be useful for excluding clinically relevant levels of dabigatran. Prothrombin time is potentially useful for rivaroxaban and edoxaban, but calibrated anti-Xa assays are optimal for determining clinically relevant levels of factor Xa inhibitors. Because specific reversal agents are not widely available, supportive care and interventions for local hemostasis remain the cornerstones of therapy in the patient with DOAC-associated bleeding. Nonspecific reversal agents should be considered only in the event of severe bleeding because their efficacy is unknown, and they are associated with risk of thrombosis. Recent results from phase 3/4 studies demonstrate efficacy for an antidote to dabigatran (idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment with specificity for dabigatran) and an antidote to factor Xa inhibitors (andexanet alfa, a recombinant and inactive form of factor Xa that binds inhibitors). A universal reversal agent (ciraparantag) for many anticoagulants, including the DOACs, shows promise in results from phase 1 and 2 studies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Hemorrhage; Humans; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Prothrombin Time; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban

Atrial fibrillation is a common finding in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which increases markedly the embolism risk. The CHADS2 and HAS-BLED scales, used in the general population to assess the risk/benefit of oral anticoagulation (OAC), underestimate respectively the risk of embolism and haemorrhage in CKD, making it difficult to decide whether to use OAC or not. Based on the available evidence, it seems indicated to use OAC in stage 3 CKD, while it is controversial in advanced stages. New OAC such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been approved in stage 3 CKD but their role is still somewhat uncertain.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Four target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOA's) have been compared to a vitamin K antagonist for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE): dabigatran (D), rivaroxaban (R), apixaban (A) and edoxaban (E). We performed an indirect comparison of the TSOA's, based on the six phase III trials identified (RE-COVER I, RE-COVER II, EINSTEIN-DVT, EINSTEIN-PE, AMPLIFY and Hokusai-VTE). There was no statistically significant difference in risk of recurrent VTE or all-cause mortality between the TSOA's. For major bleeding, the RR of an event was 0.42 (95% CI 0.21-0.87, p = 0.02) for A versus D, compared with 0.57 (95% CI 0.29-1.15, p = 0.12) for A versus R, 0.37 (95% CI 0.19-0.73, p < 0.001) for A versus E, 0.74 (95% CI 0.42-1.30, p = 0.30) for R versus D, 0.64 (95% CI 0.38-1.08, p = 0.10) for R versus E and 1.15 (95% CI 0.66-2.00, p = 0.62) for E versus D. For the composite endpoint of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, the RR was 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.96, p = 0.02) for A versus D, 0.47 (95% CI 0.37-0.61, p < 0.001) for A versus R, 0.54 (95% CI 0.42-0.70, p < 0.001) for A versus E, 1.50 (95% CI 1.17-1.92, p = 0.001) for R versus D, 1.15 (95% CI 0.95-1.39, p = 0.16) for R versus E and 1.31 (95% CI 1.02-1.68, p = 0.04) for E versus D. Overall, apixaban appears to be associated with a lower risk of bleeding than the other TSOA's. This analysis may be helpful to the clinician in trying to balance risk versus benefit in selecting a new anticoagulant. A dedicated randomized trial directly comparing the new agents would be required to confirm these results.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Survival Analysis; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis

The prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a clinical challenge, primarily owing to drawbacks associated with the use of heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). These and other factors, including a growing elderly population, mean that VTE presents a continuing burden to patients and physicians. Anticoagulant therapy is a fundamental approach for VTE management. Non-VKA oral anticoagulants, including the factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, have been studied in phase III trials across a spectrum of thromboembolic disorders. These agents offer simplified care, with similar or improved efficacy and safety outcomes compared with heparins and vitamin K antagonists. There are several factors a physician must consider when prescribing an anticoagulant. An important consideration with all anticoagulant use is bleeding risk, especially in high-risk groups such as the elderly or those with renal impairment or cancer. In orthopaedic patients, other risks include a need for surgical revision or blood transfusion, or wound complications. Therefore, the clinical benefits of an anticoagulant should ideally be balanced with any risks associated with the therapy. Quantitative benefit-risk assessments are lacking, and owing to differences in trial design the non-VKA oral anticoagulants cannot be compared directly. Based on trial and "real-life" data, this review will summarise the clinical data for the non-VKA oral anticoagulants in the prevention and treatment of VTE, focusing on the balance between the benefits and risks of anticoagulation with these drugs, and their potential impact on VTE management.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Orthopedic Procedures; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the risk of major bleeding with the use of New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs).. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NOACs (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban and darexaban) with comparators were selected.. Fifty trials included 155,537 patients. Pooled analysis of all NOACs for all indications together demonstrated no significant difference between NOACs and comparators for risk of major bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.79-1.09). Pooled analysis also showed that NOACs caused significantly less major bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (0.77, 0.64-0.91). The analysis for individual NOACs showed risk of major bleeding were not different with rivaroxaban, apixaban or dabigatran compared to pharmacologically active comparators or VKA. Indication specific analysis showed that NOACs were associated with significantly higher major bleeding after hip surgery (1.43, 1.02-1.99), in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), (compared against placebo) (2.89, 2.01-4.14), and for medically ill patients (2.79, 1.69-4.60). For the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) or pulmonary embolism (PE), NOACs were associated with significantly less bleeding (0.63, 0.44-0.90). No significant difference was found between NOACs and comparators in treatment of atrial fibrillation and for extended treatment of VTE.. Risk of major bleeding with new oral anticoagulants varies with their indication for use. New agents may be associated with comparatively less major bleeding compared to VKA. NOAC may increase the risk of major bleeding after hip surgery, ACS and acute medically ill patients; but may be associated with less bleeding in treatment of acute VTE/PE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antithrombins; Azepines; Benzamides; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes

Three factor Xa inhibitors have been studied in the treatment of venous thromboembolism, both for acute therapy and as extended therapy to prevent recurrent events. Rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have all proven to be effective in Phase III clinical trials for this indication when compared to current standard of therapy with similar or less bleeding. Nevertheless, the agents all offer different pharmacological profiles, which have an impact on patient selection and potential advantages in clinical practice.

Topics: Animals; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

We summarize the available data related to reversing the anticoagulant effect of the oral direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors and provide our opinion on treating patients presenting with severe and life-threatening hemorrhage related to these agents.. No specific antidotes are currently available for the oral direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors but two promising agents are under investigation in phase 3 trials. No data are available on reversing these agents in bleeding patients. Activated charcoal may be effective in reducing factor Xa inhibitor absorption up to 6 h after ingestion. Animal models suggest that unactivated 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate may be an effective reversal agent. Recent data in warfarin-treated patients suggest that 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate may provide more rapid and effective hemostasis than fresh frozen plasma.. In the absence of evidence in bleeding patients, animal models and ex-vivo studies suggest administration of coagulant factors in the form of hemostatic agents may be of benefit in reversing the effect of direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors. Specific reversal agents and clinical data in patients with hemorrhage remain an unmet need.

Topics: Animals; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Coagulants; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Models, Animal; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

The increasing and widespread use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demands guidelines and experts' consensus for their rational and safe use, especially in certain situations for which there is no evidence-based consensus, such as the periprocedural setting. Rivaroxaban is an oral factor Xa inhibitor approved for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in major orthopedic surgery. This article is addressed to all the clinicians involved in the periprocedural approach of patients treated with rivaroxaban, with the aim to give practical recommendations to improve patients' management during and after surgery.. This article is based on a consensus of specialists involved in anticoagulant treatment and in periprocedural setting, including experts in thrombosis, cardiologists, internists, clinical pathologists and anesthesiologists. The authors performed a review of the literature and expressed statements based on the results of the review as well as on personal experience.. Rivaroxaban is a safe and effective drug that simplifies management of anticoagulation also in patients undergoing invasive procedures. However, periprocedural management could be challenging and physicians must carefully balance the risk of bleeding and the risk of thrombosis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Perioperative Period; Postoperative Complications; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Four non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, have been evaluated in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism, and all except edoxaban have also been studied for extended secondary prophylaxis after venous thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban, and recently also dabigatran, has been approved for this indication, and it is therefore timely to review the characteristics, efficacy, and safety of these drugs with emphasis on patients with venous thromboembolism. This review focuses on the clinical results from the phase III trials, separately for each of the drugs as compared with vitamin K antagonists. We also address the results from meta-analyses that were published recently. Finally, the results in some special groups of interest-renal impairment, elderly patients, and patients with cancer-are reviewed, although they only comprised small minorities of the study populations. All 4 drugs demonstrated noninferiority against vitamin K antagonists in the acute treatment and clear superiority against placebo in the extended treatment (not performed with edoxaban). The risk of bleeding was generally lower with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, and the reduction of risk of intracranial hemorrhage seems to mirror the experience from atrial fibrillation trials. In conclusion, during the past 30 years we have moved from a week of hospitalization and intravenous heparin therapy, via low-molecular-weight heparin injections subcutaneously and early discharge from the hospital, to the possibility of only oral outpatient therapy without coagulation monitoring, yet safe for patients with acute venous thromboembolism.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total knee replacement.. A systematic literature search in Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid and Cochrane library databases was performed to identify RCTs comparing rivaroxaban/apixaban with enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE after total knee replacement. The outcomes including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) and major bleeding were pooled using risk ratios (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) as statistic.. A total of 6 RCTs with 13,790 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the incidence of DVT was significantly decreased with the use of direct Xa inhibitors (both twice daily [b.i.d] and once daily [q.d.] regimes) comparing with the enoxaparin treatment (P<0.01); however, there was no significant influencing difference between direct Xa inhibitors (b.i.d. regime) and enoxaparin on the incidence of PE (P=0.06), while significantly lower rate was found for q.d. regime of direct Xa inhibitors (P=0.02). With respect to major bleeding, the pooled analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference between direct Xa inhibitors (b.i.d. and q.d. regimes) and enoxaparin (30mg and 40mg b.i.d.).. In conclusion, our results confirmed that direct Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) were more effective for prevention of VTE after total knee replacement as compared with enoxaparin, without increasing major bleeding risk.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Anticoagulant medications help to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events after total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. Traditionally, this has been accomplished with medications, such as low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin. However, these traditional anticoagulants possess a variety of shortcomings that leave much room for improvement. A new class of oral anticoagulants is now available, and present a more convenient option for safe and efficacious thromboprophylaxis in post arthroplasty patients, particularly in the outpatient setting. This review focuses on the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, and the selective factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, and the clinical data to date about their use in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Elective Surgical Procedures; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Rivaroxaban is a once-daily oral anticoagulant currently marketed for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. This indication is largely based on the results of the ROCKET-AF trial. Although these results are robust, studies performed in clinical practice are necessary to confirm these data in real-life patients. These studies have shown rates of stroke and bleeding similar to that found in ROCKET-AF. As an anticoagulant, attention should be paid to making a correct prescription of rivaroxaban, particularly in fragile patients, to reduce the risk of bleeding. In addition, a number of studies have shown that rivaroxaban is cost-effective in clinical practice. Moreover, rivaroxaban is a good alternative to warfarin in patients undergoing elective cardioversion or atrial fibrillation ablation.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in the periprocedural anticoagulation for patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is not well established. We sought to systematically review this evidence using data from multiple studies. A thorough literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMABSE, Web of knowledge, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane library up to November 2014. Studies of at least 100 patients in rivaroxaban and warfarin groups were included. Nine observational studies were identified enrolling a total of 4,334 patients (1,210 treated with rivaroxaban and 3,124 with warfarin). The primary outcomes were thromboembolic events and major bleeding. The fixed-effects model meta-analysis was performed and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated. No significant differences were found between patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin with regard to thromboembolic events (0.25% rivaroxaban vs. 0.29% warfarin; RR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.21-1.76; P=0.36) and major bleeding (1.03% rivaroxaban vs. 1.83% warfarin; RR: 0.51; 95%CI: 0.26-1.00; P=0.05). This meta-analysis suggests that patients treated with rivaroxaban have a similar incidence of thromboembolic events and major bleeding compared to warfarin. Signals were seen favoring rivaroxaban; however, considering low events rates, more high-quality studies are necessary to thoroughly compare the two strategies.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Combined Modality Therapy; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Patient Safety; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Several new anticoagulants have entered the clinical arena or are under clinical development. These drugs include indirect (fondaparinux) and direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, betrixaban), and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Especially the oral direct FXa and FIIa inhibitors overcome many of the shortcomings of heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). They are administered orally at a fixed dose; regular monitoring is not necessary; interaction with other drugs or nutrition occur less than with VKAs and they are at least as effective as VKAs for most indications tested. They are associated with about 50 % less intracranial bleeding than VKAs. Nevertheless, they are still associated with bleeding complications. Bleeding can occur spontaneously or as a result of trauma or urgent surgery. In such situations rapid reversal of the anticoagulant effect is highly desirable. For unfractionated heparin protamine, and for VKAs prothrombin complex concentrates are available as specific antidotes. Under clinical development are: for the direct and indirect FXa inhibitors a modified recombinant FXa (andexanet alpha), which lacks enzymatic activity; and for dabigatran a Fab fragment of a monoclonal antibody (idarucizumab). In addition a small molecule (aripazine) has entered phase I clinical trials, which seems to inhibit nearly all anticoagulants but VKAs and argatroban. This review summarises the current options and strategies in development to antagonise anticoagulants with a focus on the status of the development of antidotes for the oral direct FXa and FIIa inhibitors.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzamides; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Heparin; Humans; Infusions, Parenteral; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Polysaccharides; Protamines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thrombosis; Vitamin K

Anticoagulation in cardioversion and ablation of atrial fibrillation is imperative for reducing thrombo-embolic events. Ample information is available about the use of warfarin and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) but few trials examine safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in these procedures. We aim to explore the hypothesis that rivaroxaban causes equal thrombo-embolic and bleeding events when used in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing ablation or cardioversion compared to VKA.. We searched the online databases as well as conference abstracts till December 2014 for studies comparing rivaroxaban with VKA in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing catheter ablation or cardioversion. We report events as Odds ratio using random effects model except when event rates were less than 1% we used Peto Odds Ratio.. A total of 8872 atrial fibrillation patients in 15 studies undergoing either catheter ablation or cardioversion were included in this analysis. There were significantly lower stroke events with rivaroxaban compared with VKA (Peto Odds Ratio (POR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.11, 0.95]; P=0.04), and significantly less thrombo-embolic events with rivaroxaban compared with VKA (POR 0.46, 95% CI [0.21, 0.97]; P=0.04). Major and minor bleeding were equal with rivaroxaban versus VKA (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% CI [0.62, 1.36]; P=0.68) and (OR 0.81,95% CI [0.58, 1.11]; P=0.19) respectively.. The use of rivaroxaban in ablation and cardioversion of atrial fibrillation may be associated with decreased risk of stroke and thromboembolism with equal bleeding risk compared to VKA.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Warfarin, the most commonly used of the vitamin K antagonists, has been a mainstay of oral anticoagulation for decades. However, its usage is limited by morbidity and mortality secondary to bleeding as well as a cumbersome therapeutic monitoring process. In the past several years, a number of competing novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been developed, each of which aspires to match or exceed warfarin's effectiveness while mitigating bleeding risk and eliminating therapeutic monitoring requirements. At present, 1 oral direct thrombin inhibitor and 2 direct factor Xa inhibitors are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Here, we compare the clinical efficacy and safety profiles of these new drugs. In addition, we discuss various laboratory assays that may be useful to measure these drugs in certain clinical circumstances. Finally, we discuss emerging strategies to reverse these agents in an emergency. The purpose of this article is to provide a framework for practicing pathologists to advise clinicians on NOAC laboratory measurement and management of NOAC-associated bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Laboratories; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Modern direct-acting anticoagulants are rapidly replacing vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the management of millions of patients worldwide who require anticoagulation. These drugs include agents that inhibit activated factor X (FXa) (such as apixaban and rivaroxaban) or thrombin (such as dabigatran), and are collectively known today as non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Since bleeding is the most common and most dangerous side effect of long-term anticoagulation, and because NOACs have very different mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics compared with VKA, physicians are naturally concerned about the lack of experience regarding frequency, management and outcome of NOAC-associated bleeding in daily care. This review appraises trial and registry (or "real-world") data pertaining to bleeding complications in patients taking NOACs and VKA and provides practical recommendations for the management of acute bleeding situations.

Topics: Antithrombins; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly common cause of stroke and systemic embolism. While warfarin has been the mainstay of stroke prevention in patients with AF, newer novel oral anticoagulant medications are now available. Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor with a rapid onset and offset after oral administration, offers potential advantages over warfarin, predominantly due to its predictable pharmacokinetics across wide patient populations. It requires no coagulation monitoring, and only two different doses are needed (20 mg daily for patients with normal renal function and 15 mg daily in those with reduced renal function). A large randomized trial (ROCKET AF) has shown non-inferiority to warfarin for preventing stroke or systemic embolism in the per-protocol population and superiority to warfarin in the on-treatment safety population. Several subanalyses confirm that the treatment effect of rivaroxaban is consistent across different patient subgroups, including those with reduced renal function. The tolerability of rivaroxaban appears similar to that of warfarin, with comparable overall bleeding rates in clinical trials. In ROCKET AF, significantly lower rates of fatal and intracranial bleeding were seen with rivaroxaban, while lower rates of gastrointestinal bleeding were seen with warfarin. Important contraindications to rivaroxaban include valvular AF, the presence of a prosthetic valve (mechanical or bioprosthetic) or valve repair, the need for concurrent dual antiplatelet therapy, and creatinine clearance <30 ml/min. Once-daily dosing and the lack of coagulation monitoring may increase utilization and adherence compared with warfarin, potentially decreasing the large burden of care associated with stroke secondary to AF. Overall, rivaroxaban offers a useful alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

In the last few years, a new category of anticoagulants have been developed, the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The NOACs are of two classes: the direct thrombin inhibitor, namely dabigatran etexilate; and the oral factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, which have been proven to be as effective and safe (and sometimes, superior) compared to warfarin in the treatment of both atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). One major concern about their use has always been the lack of an effective antidote or reversal strategy. The objective of this editorial is to provide an overview of the characteristics of NOAC antidotes that are in development. Moreover, we review their likely place in the management of NOAC-related bleeding episodes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have now widely reached the lucrative market of anticoagulation. While the marketing authorization holders claimed that no routine monitoring is required and that these compounds can be given at fixed doses, several evidences arisen from the literature tend to demonstrate the opposite. New data suggests that an assessment of the response at the individual level could improve the benefit-risk ratio of at least dabigatran. Information regarding the association of rivaroxaban and apixaban exposure and the bleeding risk is available in the drug approval package on the FDA website. These reviews suggest that accumulation of these compounds increases the risk of experiencing a bleeding complication. Therefore, in certain patient populations such as patients with acute or chronic renal impairment or with multiple drug interactions, measurement of drug exposure may be useful to ensure an optimal treatment response. More specific circumstances such as patients experiencing a haemorrhagic or thromboembolic event during the treatment duration, patients who require urgent surgery or an invasive procedure, or patient with a suspected overdose could benefit from such a measurement. This paper aims at providing guidance on how to best estimate the intensity of anticoagulation using laboratory assays in daily practice.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

This study was designed to compare efficacy and safety among novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which have not been directly compared in randomized control trials to date.. We performed network meta-analyses of randomized control trials in preventing thromboembolic events and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for published studies and various registries of clinical trials for unpublished studies were searched for 2002-2013. All phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NOACs (apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban), idraparinux, and ximelagatran were reviewed.. A systematic literature search identified nine phase III RCTs for primary analyses. The efficacy of each NOAC was similar with respect to our primary composite endpoint following adjustment for open label designs [odds ratios (ORs) versus vitamin K antagonists: apixaban 0.79; dabigatran 150mg 0.77; edoxaban 60mg 0.87; rivaroxaban 0.86] except for dabigatran 110mg and edoxaban 30mg. Apixaban and edoxaban 30mg and 60mg had significantly fewer major bleeding events than dabigatran 150mg, ricvaroxaban, and vitamin K antagonists. All NOACs were similar in reducing secondary endpoints with the exception of dabigatran 110mg and 150mg which were associated with a significantly greater incidence of myocardial infarction compared to apixaban, edoxaban 60mg, and rivaroxaban.. Our indirect comparison with adjustment for study design suggests that the efficacy of the examined NOACs is similar across drugs, but that some differences in safety and risk of myocardial infarction exist, and that open label study designs appear to overestimate safety and treatment efficacy. Differences in study design should be taken into account in the interpretation of results from RCTs of NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azetidines; Benzylamines; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Oligosaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is accompanied by an increased risk for thromboembolic events in most affected patients. Current guidelines therefore recommend antithrombotic therapy with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or non VKA oral anticoagulant (NOAC) in the majority of AF patients. Current AF treatment guidelines recommend that only patients younger than 65 years of age with lone AF, meaning without further concomitant risk factors for thromboembolic events should not be anticoagulated. NOACs, like the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the factor X inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have undergone large phase III clinical trials concerning treatment efficacy and bleeding risk in comparison to the VKA warfarin. In most cases, treatment with NOACs has been shown to decrease thromboembolic risk and/or decrease bleeding risk when compared with warfarin. Especially, as major hemorrhages like life threatening or intracranial bleeds are reduced, the question arises, if due to favourable adverse event ratios the indication for oral anticoagulation therapy should be broadened and all patients with diagnosed AF should be anticoagulated. This article gives a review on currently used thromboembolic and bleeding risk scores. Furthermore, the impact of NOAC therapy on stroke and bleeding risk is summarized, especially taking pharmacological interactions of NOAC therapy altering thromboembolic or bleeding risk into consideration. Differences of currently available guidelines are discussed. Finally, ongoing recent studies on treatment of low risk patients are debated.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Thrombo-embolic prophylaxis is a key element within the therapy of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter. Besides new oral anticoagulants the concept of left atrial appendage occlusion has approved to be a good alternative option, especially in patients with increased risk of bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Combined Modality Therapy; Contraindications; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Although the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) do not require routine monitoring and reduce bleeding compared with warfarin, there are special circumstances in which laboratory measurement or reversal of their anticoagulant effect may be indicated. The dilute thrombin time and ecarin-based assays are able to quantify dabigatran across a broad range of concentrations, but are not widely available. A normal thrombin time excludes clinically relevant levels and a normal activated partial thromboplastin time probably excludes excess levels of dabigatran. Factor Xa inhibitors may be quantified with an anti-Xa assay calibrated with drug-specific standards. A normal prothrombin time probably excludes excess levels of rivaroxaban and edoxaban, but not apixaban. Patients with minor and moderate DOAC-associated bleeding can be treated with supportive care and general hemostatic measures. Nonspecific reversal agents (eg, prothrombin complex concentrate, activated prothrombin complex concentrate) are of unproven benefit, carry a risk of thrombosis, and should be reserved for severe bleeding. Specific reversal agents, such as idarucizumab (a monoclonal antibody fragment that binds dabigatran) and andexanet alfa (a recombinant factor Xa variant that binds factor Xa inhibitors but lacks coagulant activity), are in clinical development.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Blood Coagulation Factors; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Factor VIIa; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Humans; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Piperazines; Prothrombin; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thrombin Time

Dabigatran (a direct thrombin inhibitor) and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban (direct activated factor X inhibitors) are increasingly being used in clinical practice. Compared with vitamin K antagonists, they are more convenient, do not require laboratory monitoring, have limited drug and food interactions, and have fixed dosages suitable for most patients. But the shortcomings of these agents can jeopardize their efficacy and increase the risk of bleeding. Their future role in preventing and treating thromboembolic disease will depend on building clinical experience, but current evidence indicates that they are reasonable alternatives to vitamin K antagonists.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis

This study aimed to ascertain otolaryngologists' current knowledge of new (e.g. apixaban, rivaroxaban) and old (e.g. warfarin) anticoagulant medications, and to provide an educational overview of new anticoagulants for use by surgeons.. A questionnaire survey was distributed across the Wessex region, UK, to ascertain the levels of knowledge of and confidence in managing patients taking various anticoagulants. In total, 50 questionnaires were completed (41 by trainees and 9 by consultants). A literature review of new anticoagulant medications was then conducted.. In general, there was poor clinical and pharmacokinetic knowledge of newly licensed anticoagulant medications. Respondents were more confident in the use of older vs newer forms of anticoagulants. This was true across all grades of doctors, but particularly at the senior level. All respondents stated that they would like to see an educational resource on anticoagulants.. Knowledge of newly licensed anticoagulation medications is poor. This study has produced an educational resource for the management of anticoagulant agents. A thorough knowledge of these drugs is essential for the acute management of bleeding patients and in peri-operative surgical planning.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Clinical Competence; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Otolaryngology; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Surveys and Questionnaires; United Kingdom

Stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation relies on an assessment of the individual risks for stroke and bleeding. Patients at high risk for stroke are candidates for anticoagulant therapy. Anticoagulants, however, have substantial bleeding risks that must be weighed in the therapeutic decision. Warfarin has been the traditional choice, but the recently introduced novel oral anticoagulants offer similar efficacy with less bleeding risk. Additionally, they do not require monitoring and have fewer drug interactions and dietary restrictions than warfarin. Several devices, which isolate the left atrial appendage, have become available as treatment options for patients with elevated risks of both thromboembolism and bleeding complications.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Equipment and Supplies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ligation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist and share a reciprocal relationship. The presence of AF increases the propensity to HF and can worsen its severity as well as escalating the risk of stroke. Despite the proven efficacy of vitamin K antagonists and warfarin for stroke prevention in AF, their use is beset by numerous problems. These include their slow onset and offset of action, unpredictability of response, the need for frequent coagulant monitoring and serious concerns around the increased risks of intracranial and major bleeding. Three recently approved novel anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) are already challenging warfarin use in AF. They have a predictable therapeutic response and a wide therapeutic range and do not necessitate coagulation monitoring. In this article, the relationship between HF and AF and the mechanisms for their compounded stroke risk are reviewed. The evidence to support the use of these three NOACs amongst patients with AF and HF is further explored.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Chronic Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Elective Surgical Procedures; Emergencies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Morpholines; Orthopedic Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Premedication; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Vitamin K

New direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs) constitute a novel treatment option for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), with practical advantages. Individual studies have demonstrated comparable efficacy to that of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and have suggested a more favorable safety profile . We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of NOACs as compared with those of VKAs in patients with acute VTE.. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Clinical Trials Registry up to October 2013. Eligible studies included phase 3 trials comparing NOACs with VKAs in patients with acute VTE. Relative risks (RRs), absolute risk differences and numbers needed to treat (NNTs) to prevent one event were calculated for recurrent VTE, fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), overall mortality, major bleeding, and other bleeding complications, with random-effects models.. Five studies were included, investigating four NOACs (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban) in 24 455 patients with acute VTE. RRs for recurrent VTE, fatal PE and overall mortality for NOACs vs. VKAs were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.05), 1.02 (95% CI 0.39-5.96), and 0.97 (95% CI 0.83-1.14), respectively. The RR for major bleeding was 0.60 (95% CI 0.41-0.88). The NNT with NOACs instead of VKA to prevent one major bleed was 149. The RR and NNT for fatal bleeding were 0.36 (95% CI 0.15-0.87) and 1111. A fixed-effect network analysis did not demonstrate significant differences between individual NOACs and rivaroxaban.. NOACs have comparable efficacy to that of VKAs, and are associated with a significantly lower risk of bleeding complications, although the NNT to prevent one major bleed was relatively high.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

In October 2011, DTB reviewed the use of dabigatran, the first new oral anticoagulant licensed for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and one or more defined risk factors.1 We noted that the potential advantages of dabigatran for many patients with AF and the continuing need to provide warfarin therapy for others, provided an important challenge for the NHS. The use of dabigatran has increased significantly in the UK and two other drugs have been licensed for this indication (▾apixaban-Eliquis, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer; ▾rivaroxaban-Xarelto, Bayer plc).2-6 In addition, published drug safety alerts have highlighted the risk of serious haemorrhage associated with the use of these drugs.7-9 Here we review the evidence for apixaban and rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) usually receive acetylsalicylic acid plus an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitor to reduce the long-term risk of recurrent events. However, patients receiving standard antiplatelet prophylaxis still face a substantial risk of recurrent events. Strategies involving 3 antithrombotic agents with different modes of action have now been tested. In Thrombin Receptor Antagonists for Clinical Event Reduction (TRA-CER), compared with standard care alone, bleeding complications including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were increased with the addition of vorapaxar, without efficacy benefit. In Trial to Assess the Effects of SCH 530348 in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Patients With Atherosclerosis (TRA 2°P-TIMI 50), the addition of vorapaxar reduced recurrent events compared with standard care in stable patients with prior myocardial infarction. This study was terminated early in patients with prior stroke owing to excess ICH, though an increased risk of ICH or fatal bleeding was not detected in patients with prior myocardial infarction. The Apixaban for Prevention of Acute Ischemic and Safety Events 2 (APPRAISE-2) trial of standard-dose apixaban added to standard care in patients with ACS was also stopped early owing to excess serious bleeding. However, in Rivaroxaban in Combination With Aspirin Alone or With Aspirin and a Thienopyridine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes (ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51), fatal bleeding or fatal ICH did not increase with low-dose rivaroxaban added to low-dose acetylsalicylic acid-based standard care compared with standard care alone. In that trial, a significant reduction of recurrent vascular events was shown with 3 antithrombotic regimens compared with standard care. Therefore, depending on drug dose and patient population, further reductions in recurrent vascular events after ACS may be possible in future clinical practice, with a favorable benefit-risk profile.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coronary Thrombosis; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Imines; Lactones; Morpholines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes; Thrombin

During the past four years the phase III trials on stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation and on treatment of venous thromboembolism have been completed for four new oral anticoagulants - dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban. The studies have revealed advantages in terms of a reduced risk of bleeding, most importantly of intracranial bleeding. These anticoagulants also have favourable pharmacokinetics, eliminating the need for routine laboratory monitoring and dose adjustments. There are, however, some differences between the drugs in certain subsets of patients, according to patient characteristics or to indication for treatment. These features are reviewed here. The management of patients in association with invasive procedures or major bleeding is also discussed. Finally, a strategy of how to select patients for warfarin or the new anticoagulants and thereafter possibly also among the latter is outlined.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) specifically target factor IIa or Xa and represent a major step forward in the treatment of acute- and long-term prevention of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE). They are at least as effective and as safe as conventional therapy (heparins and vitamin-K inhibitors) and have practical advantages, such as fixed dosing and no need for laboratory monitoring. These antithrombotic agents introduce a new paradigm for the day-to-day management of VTE. Direct oral anticoagulants should streamline the management of most patients with VTE and will facilitate care in the outpatient setting. Nevertheless, it remains uncertain how to select specific DOACs for particular profiles of patients, and the optimal management of bleeding complications is evolving.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Long-Term Care; Morpholines; Perioperative Care; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

The recent arrival of the target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) offers potential advantages in the field of anticoagulation. However, there are no rapid and accurate and routinely available laboratory assays to evaluate their contribution to clinical bleeding. With the expanding clinical indications for the TSOACs, and the arrival of newer reversal agents on the market, the emergency clinician will need to be familiar with drug specifics as well as methods for anticoagulation reversal. This review offers a summary of the literature and some practical strategies for the approach to the patient taking TSOACs and the management of bleeding in these cases.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Emergency Treatment; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor

Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that is widely available to reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and one or more risk factors for stroke. Rivaroxaban provides practical advantages compared with warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists, including a rapid onset of action, few drug interactions, no dietary interactions, a predictable anticoagulant effect, and no requirement for routine coagulation monitoring. However, questions have emerged relating to the responsible use of rivaroxaban in day-to-day clinical practice, including patient selection, dosing, treatment of patients with renal impairment, conversion from use of vitamin K antagonists to rivaroxaban and vice versa, coagulation tests, and management of patients requiring invasive procedures or experiencing bleeding or an ischemic event. This article provides practical recommendations relating to the use of rivaroxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, based on clinical trial evidence, relevant guidelines, prescribing information, and the authors' clinical experience.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Substitution; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Perioperative Care; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Preventive Health Services; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

Heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) used commonly are the standard treatment of venous and arterial thromboses. They are very efficient and safe, but have some limitations: iatrogenicity, laboratory monitoring, parenteral use for heparins and fondaparinux. Nowadays, four new inhibitors of factor Xa are used orally (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, betrixaban), and they are at least as efficient as heparins and vitamin K antagonists. The objective is to substitute these indirect inhibitors of factor Xa (heparins, low molecular weight heparins and fondaparinux) in the prevention of venous and arterial thromboembolic episodes. The new direct inhibitors do not require routine laboratory monitoring of blood coagulation. They inhibit the extrinsic and the intrinsic pathways of blood coagulation. Rivaroxaban and apixaban are efficacious and safe in the prevention of cerebral infarcts in patients with non-valvular fibrillation. Apixaban is another direct inhibitor of factor Xa used orally which is developed in the same indications as rivaroxaban. Edoxaban and betrixaban are also in development. The objective of this work is to study the pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, the efficacy and safety of these four oral direct factor Xa inhibitors.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzamides; Blood Coagulation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Thrombosis

Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is a novel oral anticoagulant approved for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and also approved in Europe (but not in the United States) to prevent recurrent ischemic events in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes. Advantages of rivaroxaban over oral anticoagulants such as warfarin are the lack of need for ongoing monitoring, a fixed-dose regimen, and fewer drug and food interactions. Drawbacks include a lack of an antidote and the absence of a widely available method to reliably monitor the anticoagulant effect. In patients at risk of stroke due to atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior compared to warfarin in preventing stroke/systemic embolism in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) trial and was associated with a similar risk of major bleeding; the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage was 33% lower with rivaroxaban. Concerns raised about the trial were the adequacy of warfarin management and the increase in event rate at the end of the trial. The drug acquisition cost of rivaroxaban is higher than that of warfarin although decision-analytic models suggest that it is cost effective in atrial fibrillation. In patients with recent acute coronary syndrome, low-dose rivaroxaban reduced mortality and the composite end point of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction and stroke, but this was accompanied by an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage and major bleeding in the Rivaroxaban in Combination With Aspirin Alone or With Aspirin and a Thienopyridine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI) 51 trial. Thus, rivaroxaban appears to be a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in atrial fibrillation although caution should be exercised, given the limited experience in combination with novel oral antiplatelet agents. The role of rivaroxaban as part of a modern regimen in acute coronary syndrome continues to be evaluated.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

Anticoagulation therapy is one of the most important advances in modern medicine, saving thousands of lives from the complications of atrial fibrillation and mechanical heart valves and preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism. Warfarin and heparins have been the predominant anticoagulants used until the past decade. However, the arrival of newer target-specific anticoagulants has brought us easier and equally effective agents, although no specific antidotes are yet available. Being relatively newer drugs, physicians need to be familiar with the various practical issues that may be encountered with the prescription of these drugs, which are summarised in this review.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants like the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran (Pradaxa®), and factor Xa-inhibitors, rivaroxaban (Xarelto®) and apixaban (Eliquis®) are available for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease. They are emerging alternatives to warfarin and provide equal or better clinical outcome together with reduced need for routine monitoring. Methods for measuring drug concentrations are available, although a correlation between plasma drug concentrations and the risk of bleeding has not been firmly established. Standard laboratory measures like prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time are not sensitive enough to detect thrombin or factor Xa inhibition provided by new oral anticoagulants. Thus, these standard tests may only be used as a crude estimation of the actual anticoagulation status. Further challenges regarding patients receiving new oral anticoagulants who presents with major bleeding or need for emergency surgery pose a unique problem. No established agents are clinically available to reverse the anticoagulant effect, although preclinical data report prothrombin complex concentrate as more efficient than fresh frozen plasma or other prohaemostatic agents. This review summaries current knowledge on approved new oral anticoagulants and discusses clinical aspects of monitoring, with particular focus on the management of the bleeding patient.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatic Techniques; Hemostatics; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Thrombophilia

Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke, which is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. The use of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation at moderate or high risk of stroke, estimated by established criteria, improves outcomes. However, to ensure that the benefits exceed the risks of bleeding, appropriate patient selection is essential. Vitamin K antagonism has been the mainstay of treatment; however, newer drugs with novel mechanisms are also available. These novel oral anticoagulants (direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors) obviate many of warfarin's shortcomings, and they have demonstrated safety and efficacy in large randomized trials of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. However, the management of patients taking warfarin or novel agents remains a clinical challenge. There are several important considerations when selecting anticoagulant therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation. This review will discuss the rationale for anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation; risk stratification for treatment; available agents; the appropriate implementation of these agents; and additional, specific clinical considerations for treatment.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Arterial thrombosis in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with activation of platelets and the coagulation cascade. Persistent thrombin levels have been reported after ACS in such patients. Novel oral anticoagulants without a need of close monitoring and frequent blood tests such as warfarin can provide a chronic beneficial effect on recurrent ischaemic events in such a population. Rivaroxaban, a new oral factor Xa inhibitor, has been tried for this indication in the 'Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects With Acute Coronary Syndrome ACS 2-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 51' (ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51) trial using a low dose regimen in an attempt to balance the adverse effects of bleeding related to chronic anticoagulation on background of dual antiplatelet therapy for ACS, and the beneficial effects on recurrent coronary ischemia. The role of rivaroxaban in this context has been discussed in detail in this review.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

The acceptability of warfarin has been limited by mandatory laboratory monitoring. A number of new orally active anticoagulants (NOACs), which can be used as alternatives to warfarin, are now available.. We review the clinical indications and considerations associated with the use of the NOACs.. The NOACs currently approved in Australia are dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban. Indications include thromboprophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and following hip and knee replacement surgery. Rivaroxaban is also approved for treatment and secondary prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE). The NOACs differ from warfarin in that they do not require laboratory monitoring. They need to be used cautiously in patients with renal impairment and are contraindicated in patients with renal failure. Bleeding may require blood product replacement aided by haematological advice and specialist investigations. Antidotes to the NOACS are undergoing clinical trials.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; General Practice; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients is challenging, owing to a high risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding complications. The anticoagulants of choice are low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), because of a proven higher efficacy than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and a similar bleeding profile. The recently introduced new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have the potential to be alternative options for these patients, as these drugs share practical advantages with LMWH, are administered orally, and had similar efficacy to VKAs but a lower bleeding risk in phase 3 studies in the general VTE population.. A systematic literature search was performed to identify phase 3 trials investigating NOACs for the treatment of VTE. The efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE, and the safety outcome was major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Pooled incidence rates and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for cancer patients and non-cancer patients separately.. Five studies were included, with 19 060 patients, of whom 973 (5.1%) had active cancer. The pooled incidence rates of recurrent VTE were 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-6.0) in cancer patients treated with NOACs, and 6.1% (95% CI 4.1-8.5) in patients treated with VKAs (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.38-1.2). The pooled incidence rates of major or non-major clinically relevant bleeding were 15% (95% CI 12-18) in cancer patients treated with NOACs, and 16% (95% CI 9.9-22) in patients treated with VKAs (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.70-1.3). These results form a solid basis for the initiation of a head-to-head comparison of NOACs with LMWH in cancer patients.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

The traditional treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been use of heparin and vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and although shown to be effective, they have numerous limitations. New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) including direct thrombin (factor IIa) inhibitors (dabigatran) and selective factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) have emerged as promising alternatives with the potential to overcome the limitations of traditional treatments. Clinical trials have been performed with a view to making significant changes to the acute, long-term and extended treatment of VTE. Data are now available on the efficacy and safety, including bleeding rates, of the NOACs in comparison with VKA in the acute treatment and secondary prevention of VTE as well as in comparison with placebo extended VTE treatment. This review compares and contrasts the design and results of the Phase III trials of NOACs in VTE and discusses the implications of the NOACs in terms of treatment strategies in VTE patients.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Acuity; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Despite significant advances in the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and long-term antiplatelet therapy after an ACS event, patients continue to be at risk of further cardiovascular events. There is evidence that recurrent events are at least partly attributed to the persistent activation of the coagulation system after ACS. Various anticoagulants, including vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-VKA oral anticoagulants, have been evaluated in patients post-ACS, in combination with antiplatelet therapy. The desired outcome would be a further reduction of recurrent cardiovascular events with low or acceptable levels of bleeding complications. Here, we provide an overview of the current clinical trial data of non-VKA oral anticoagulants, focusing on rivaroxaban in particular, for secondary prevention in patients with a recent ACS event.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as an alternative therapy to warfarin in the treatment of arterial and venous thromboembolism and in stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Three of them, i.e., dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, have been approved for clinical use in North America and in a number of European countries. In non-valvular AF, their approval was based on large randomized trials showing that they are non-inferior or even, in some instances, superior to warfarin. Dabigatran is a direct thrombin (factor IIa) inhibitor; rivaroxaban and apixaban are direct factor Xa inhibitors. Before using NOACs, it is recommended to become familiar with their pharmacological characteristics and their metabolism. The absence of specific antidotes is often cited as part of the possible weaknesses of NOACs. Antidotes are perceived to be useful in emergency situations such as life-threatening bleeding or non-elective major surgery. NOACs do not require blood monitoring, and therefore, patient compliance to the treatment is essential. For the present time, there are no specific antidotes available for the three NOACs approved for clinical use. However, phase I or phase II research studies in this area are ongoing. For dabigatran, a specific antidote has been tested in a rat model of anticoagulation, and a study in healthy male volunteers has been recently reported. For rivaroxaban, prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) have been found to completely reverse the prolongation of the prothrombin time induced by this NOAC. For apixaban, recombinant factor VII was found in an experimental study using human blood to be superior to activated PCC (aPCC) and PCC. More specific antidotes for rivaroxaban and apixaban are in phases I and II evaluation. The management of patients suffering from a major bleeding or requiring a non-elective major surgery includes non-specific reversal agents and is discussed in the light of a recent position paper and of current literature. Most recommendations are based on expert opinions only as randomized trials using agents for reversal of anticoagulation in case of life-threatening bleeding or of major urgent surgery are not available.

Topics: Animals; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Elective Surgical Procedures; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

In the majority of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) anticoagulation is required to reduce the risk of stroke. Although vitamin K antagonists effectively reduce the risk of stroke, they have many disadvantages that limit their use. Rivaroxaban is a new once-daily oral anticoagulant that overcomes some of these limitations (i.e., no monitoring of anticoagulant effect required and fixed doses can be prescribed). In recent AF studies, rivaroxaban was reported to be at least as effective as warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism but with a lesser risk of fatal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. More recent data have confirmed the beneficial effects of rivaroxaban, as originally described, and irrespective of the history of previous stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, diabetes, moderate renal dysfunction or age. In the present review the authors discuss current evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

In the last 4 years, 6 phase 3 trials including a total of 27,023 patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). To aid the clinician in assessing the amount of information, we address frequently raised clinical questions in a review of combined trial results. We included the phase 3 trials that compared dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban with VKA therapy in patients with acute symptomatic VTE. Recurrent VTE occurred in 2.0% of DOAC recipients compared with 2.2% in VKA recipients (relative risk [RR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.06). Treatment with a DOAC significantly reduced the risk of major bleeding (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83). In parallel, intracranial bleeding, fatal bleeding, and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred significantly less in DOAC recipients. The efficacy and safety of DOACs were consistent in patients with pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, a body weight ≥100 kg, moderate renal insufficiency, an age ≥75 years, and cancer. In conclusion, DOACs and VKAs have similar efficacy in the treatment of acute symptomatic VTE, a finding that is consistent in key clinical subgroups. Treatment with a DOAC significantly reduces the risks of major bleeding.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (OACs) for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disease represents a shift from the traditional vitamin K antagonist-based therapies, which have been the mainstay of treatment for almost 60 years. A challenge for hospital formularies will be to manage the use of direct OACs from hospital to outpatient settings. Three direct OACs-apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban-are widely approved across different indications, with rivaroxaban approved across the widest breadth of indications. A fourth direct OAC, edoxaban, has also completed phase III trials. Implementation of these agents by physicians will require an understanding of the efficacy and safety profile of these drugs, as well as an awareness of renal function, comedication use, patient adherence and compliance. Optimal implementation of direct OACs in the hospital setting will provide improved patient outcomes when compared with traditional anticoagulants and will simplify the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic diseases.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medication Adherence; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are typically managed with long-term dual antiplatelet therapy of acetylsalicylic acid plus a P2Y12 platelet receptor antagonist; however, although effective, the risk of another vascular event within 12 months remains at approximately 10%. Considerable efforts have been made to find improved therapeutic approaches to secondary prevention in ACS. The ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 trial demonstrated that rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) significantly reduced recurrent vascular events, increased the risk of major bleeding but not the risk of fatal bleeding, and resulted in reduced rates of death from cardiovascular causes. These results formed the basis for approval in Europe of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) in conjunction with standard antiplatelet therapy for the secondary prevention of ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Drug Approval; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes

Acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common disease associated to significant morbidity and mortality.. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed clinical outcomes with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban or edoxaban) for treatment of acute VTE. We used MEDLINE and CENTRAL, clinical trials registers, conference proceedings, and websites of regulatory agencies to identify randomised clinical trials of DOAC compared with conventional treatment [parenteral anticoagulant followed by a vitamin K antagonist (VKA)] for acute VTE. Two investigators independently extracted data. Relative risk of recurrent VTE, bleeding events, deaths and a net clinical endpoint (composite of recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and death) were estimated using a random effect meta-analysis (RevMan software).. Six trials including 27,127 patients were selected. The risk of recurrent VTE was similar with the DOAC and standard treatment (relative risk 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.06). The DOAC reduced the risk of major bleeding in comparison with standard treatment (0.62, 0.45 to 0.85) (absolute risk difference, -0.6%; 95% confidence interval -1.0% to -0.3%), but there was heterogeneity across trials in the relative risk of bleeding. No between treatment differences were found in the relative risk of all-cause mortality (0.98, 0.84 to 1.14). The DOAC and conventional treatment differed on the net clinical endpoint (0.85, 0.75 to 0.97). Subgroup analyses in relevant subgroups (index pulmonary embolism, heparin lead-in, age, gender, renal function, presence of cancer), as well as sensitivity analyses, were consistent with the main analysis.. The DOAC seem as effective as, and probably safer than standard treatment of acute VTE. The relative efficacy and safety of the DOAC was consistent across a wide range of patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Many new oral anticoagulants (NOACs; dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) are currently available to treat thromboembolic disease. There are no head-to-head trials comparing these agents. To assess the efficacy and safety of NOACs for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), we performed a network meta-analysis.. Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane-controlled trial register were searched, without language restriction, to identify trials. Studies were evaluated according to a priori inclusion criteria and appraised using established internal validity criteria. Adjusted indirect comparisons between agents were performed using well-established methods.. Three trials meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Direct comparison between apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily (BID) versus apixaban 5 mg BID showed no difference for any outcome. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred less with both apixaban 2.5 mg BID (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.62, P=0.004) and apixaban 5 mg BID [OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.82, P=0.019] compared to rivaroxaban 20 mg daily. Apixaban 2.5 mg BID showed less clinically relevant non-major bleeding than dabigatran 150 mg BID [OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.16-0.9, P=0.04], but not apixaban 5 mg BID. There were no differences between rivaroxaban 20 mg daily and dabigatran 150 mg BID. No differences in risk for recurrent VTE, major bleeding, or mortality were observed for any comparison between any pair of NOACs.. There were no significant differences in risk for recurrent VTE, major bleeding, or all-cause mortality between the NOACs. However, apixaban 2.5 mg BID was associated with less clinically significant non-major bleeding than either rivaroxaban 20 mg daily or dabigatran 150 mg BID.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Chi-Square Distribution; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Recent reports suggest altered antithrombotic efficacy and higher risk of bleeding with new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with renal insufficiency. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety with recommended doses of NOAC compared with conventional treatment in patients with renal insufficiency.. PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases were searched from January 1, 2001 through March 23, 2014. Randomized controlled trials that compared NOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran) with comparators (vitamin K antagonist/warfarin, low molecular weight heparin, aspirin, placebo) were selected. We defined moderate renal insufficiency as creatinine clearance (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) of 30-49 mL/min, and mild renal insufficiency as eGFR 50-79 mL/min.. There were 40,693 patients with renal insufficiency in 10 trials. Compared with other anticoagulants in patients with mild renal insufficiency there was significantly less major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.90) and stroke or systemic embolism (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.92) with NOACs. Using random effects meta-analysis, there was significantly less stroke or systemic embolism (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.92) and a trend toward less major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.59-1.14) with the NOACs among patients with moderate renal insufficiency, and this became statistically significant when evaluated using a fixed effects model. NOACs showed efficiency comparable with conventional anticoagulants for prevention of venous thromboembolism or related mortality.. In patients with renal insufficiency, recommended doses of novel anticoagulants are noninferior and relatively safe compared with conventional anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Target-specific oral anticoagulants (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) are widely available for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although analyses comparing these agents to placebo or warfarin exist, direct comparisons of these agents for extended VTE treatment have not been conducted. Therefore, this network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of VKA and target-specific oral anticoagulants for extended VTE treatment using a mixed-treatment comparison, meta-analytic approach.. A comprehensive literature search of EMBASE and MEDLINE was conducted to identify relevant randomized, controlled trials published in English between 1960 and November 2013. Eligible studies investigated the extended use (≥6 months) of oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and/or warfarin [conventional or low dose]) and placebo in patients with confirmed VTE. Search terms included extension or extended treatment or therapy, venous thromboembolism (or VTE), deep vein thrombosis (or DVT), pulmonary embolism (or PE), and anticoagulant or anticoagulant agent. Key articles were cross-referenced for additional studies. The efficacy end points evaluated were recurrent VTE or death from any cause, DVT, and nonfatal pulmonary embolism PE. Tolerability end points included major bleeding and nonmajor or clinically relevant bleeding. The data were screened, evaluated, and entered into statistical software to generate direct and indirect comparisons of the various anticoagulants across each study. The data are reported as rate ratios and 95% credible intervals.. Ten trials were analyzed and aggregated, representing data from >14,000 patients. With respect to efficacy end points, no statistically significant between-treatment differences in the composite end point of VTE or death, nonfatal PE, or DVT were found. Major bleeding was significantly greater with warfarin versus apixaban (rate ratio, 4.24; credible interval, 1.28-25.0), and the risk for major bleeding varied somewhat with warfarin and greatly with rivaroxaban. The assessment of nonmajor or clinically relevant bleeding did not identify any meaningful differences between these agents.. The majority of the data represented in this study were derived from noninferiority trials. In the present meta-analysis, efficacy end points in the extended treatment of VTE with apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, warfarin (conventional and low dose), and placebo were not significantly different. Elevated bleeding risks were identified with rivaroxaban and warfarin; however, the wide credible intervals with rivaroxaban prevent the interpretation of these increased risks.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The approval of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatranetexilat and the oral factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban as thromboprophylaxis challenges the position of the vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Predictable pharmacodynamics gives the new oral anticoagulants an advantageous profile. Unlike VKAs there is no specific reversal agent available for the new oral anticoagulants. Experience with haemostatic products for the emergency management of critical bleeding caused by these agents is limited.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Blood Coagulation Factors; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Plasma; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K

Abstract The use of dual antiplatelet therapy has led to a substantial reduction in ischemic events post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite this, recurrent event rates remain high. Recent research has combined antiplatelet with anticoagulant therapy to reduce recurrent event rates further. Compared with standard medical therapy, rivaroxaban demonstrated improved efficacy outcomes and significantly reduced mortality after an ACS. Although clear benefits of novel oral anticoagulants post-ACS have been proven, concerns regarding bleeding are still a barrier to widespread use. This review explores key trials of dual antiplatelet therapy and examines the latest research in anticoagulation aiming to optimize clinical outcomes post-ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly replacing vitamin K antagonists and older parenteral agents in clinical practice. NOACs offer several advantages compared with standard agents, including rapid onset of action, fixed dosing, and no requirement for routine coagulation monitoring. However, like all anticoagulants, NOACs carry a risk of bleeding. Here, we discuss the pharmacology and safety of NOACs, with particular emphasis on the risks of bleeding associated with NOACs versus standard anticoagulants, and we provide an overview of current bleeding management strategies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

New oral factor Xa inhibitors are intended to progressively substitute the oral vitamin K antagonists and parenteral indirect inhibitors of factor Xa in the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolic episodes. This article focuses on the main clinical studies and on biological measurements of new oral factor Xa inhibitors, and addresses several safety issues. These newer agents do not require any routine laboratory monitoring of blood coagulation; however, biological tests have been developed in order to assess the plasma concentration of these drugs in several clinical settings. This article reviews these 4 oral direct factor Xa inhibitors.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzamides; Blood Coagulation Tests; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Precision Medicine; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes

The target-specific oral anticoagulants have recently been introduced as alternatives to warfarin for both prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Although their efficacy and side-effect profiles have been favorable, there is significant concern about management of hemorrhage with these agents as there is no direct reversal agent available. It is important for clinicians to be aware of these agents and the issues that surround them. Most of the management of hemorrhage is based on expert opinion and case reviews. Given the potentially catastrophic consequences of acute hemorrhage while patients are on anticoagulation, specific treatments are needed. Some methods that have been described include activated charcoal, hemodialysis, prohemostatic agents, and transfusions. Target-specific therapies have been shown to be effective in early studies in animal models; however, the effects in humans are still under investigation. More investigation is needed on the management of bleeding complications from target-specific oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Transfusion; Charcoal; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have long been the standard of care for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite their efficacy, their use requires frequent monitoring and is complicated by drug-drug interactions and the need to maintain a narrow therapeutic window. Since 2009, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, have become alternative options to VKAs owing to their predictable and safe pharmacological profiles. The overall clinical effect of these drugs, which is a balance between ischaemic benefit and bleeding harm, varies according to the clinical scenario. As adjunctive therapy to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome, NOACs are associated with incremental bleeding risks and modest benefits. For treatment of VTE, NOACs have a safer profile than VKAs and a similar efficacy. In thromboprophylaxis in AF, NOACs are associated with the greatest benefits by reducing both ischaemic events and haemorrhagic complications and might reduce mortality compared with VKAs. The role of NOACs continues to evolve as these drugs are evaluated in different patient populations, including those with renal impairment or with AF and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Vitamin K

The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) that have emerged onto the market for use in some indications similar to those for warfarin; in addition, edoxaban is seeking FDA approval. Similar indications include reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation for all 3 agents, for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis that may lead to pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing hip or knee surgery for rivaroxaban and apixaban, and for the treatment and prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. As anticoagulants, they are all associated with a risk of bleeding, and, unfortunately, there are no approved antidotes for reversal of these agents. A number of small studies in human subjects and in human/animal models exposed to TSOACs have evaluated the use of activated charcoal, hemodialysis for dabigatran, or clotting factor concentrates for their ability to neutralize the anticoagulant effects or reduce drug concentrations of TSOACs. Clotting factor concentrates that have been used include prothrombin complex concentrates and recombinant factor VII. This review examines studies and case reports evaluating these strategies for expedited or emergent reversal of TSOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Factors; Charcoal; Dabigatran; Factor VIIa; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes

Disadvantages with traditional anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists and heparinoids) have led to the development on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). These agents are set to replace the traditional anticoagulants in situations such as following orthopaedic surgery, in atrial fibrillation, and in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Although superior to vitamin K antagonists and heparinoids in several aspects, NOACs retain the ability to cause haemorrhage and, despite claims to the contrary, may need monitoring. This review aims to summarise key aspects of the NOACs of relevance to the laboratory.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events is the domain of antiplatelet therapy and according to present risk is used one drug strategy or combination of acetylsalicylic acid with ADP receptor blockers. The importance of the combination of dual antiplatelet therapy together with xabans or dabigatran was investigated in 6 clinical trials. Only one of them (ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51) indicated that treatment with small dose of rivaroxaban (2 × 2.5 mg) may be added to dual strategy of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel. The risk of major bleeding event is increased and net clinical benefit is only about 0.5 % per year. Dual therapy with aspirin and prasugrel or tikagrelor is beneficial. In the second part of the review is discussed higher incidence of myocardial infarction in controlled group in the trial comparing treatment of dabigatran with warfarin. This relationship has not been resolved, however, in patients with higher risk of coronary events and indication of anticoagulant treatment with direct oral anticoagulants it is recommended to choose from xabans (apixaban and rivaroxaban).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Until recently, only vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were used for long-term anticoagulation. New oral anticoagulants, with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics different to VKAs, are now available for some indications. Rivaroxaban (Xarelto®) is an oral Factor Xa inhibitor approved in many countries for long-term treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. This article is addressed to all professionals involved in the management of treated patients to highlight the characteristics of rivaroxaban and provide practical guidance on management of treated patients.. This article is based on a consensus of specialists involved in the management of anticoagulant treatment, including thrombosis experts, cardiologists, neurologists, emergency medicine specialists, and general practitioners. The authors performed a nonsystematic review of the literature, and expressed guidance statements based on the results of the review as well as personal experience.. Availability of new anticoagulant drugs, including rivaroxaban, is an important step forward to allow easier, more effective, and safer long-term anticoagulation in patients in whom adequate anticoagulation is currently denied due to the limitations of VKAs. However, given their totally new properties, associated risks, and expected broad clinical use, expert professionals and manufacturers must urgently tackle a series of issues.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Consensus; Drug Interactions; Drug Substitution; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Managing patients in the perioperative setting receiving novel oral anticoagulation agents for thromboprophylaxis or stroke prevention with atrial fibrillation is an important consideration for clinicians. The novel oral anticoagulation agents include direct Factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban, and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. In elective surgery, discontinuing their use is important, but renal function must also be considered because elimination is highly dependent on renal elimination. If bleeding occurs in patients who have received these agents, common principles of bleeding management as with any anticoagulant (including the known principles for warfarin) should be considered. This review summarizes the available data regarding the management of bleeding with novel oral anticoagulation agents. Hemodialysis is a therapeutic option for dabigatran-related bleeding, while in vitro studies showed that prothrombin complex concentrates are reported to be useful for rivaroxaban-related bleeding. Additional clinical studies are needed to determine the best method for reversal of the novel oral anticoagulation agents when bleeding occurs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Critical Care; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Morpholines; Perioperative Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants (OACs), including dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, are available alternative anticoagulant therapy to vitamin K antagonists. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for the treatment of appropriate patients for specific clinical indications. Therapeutic advantages of prescribing the new OACs are related to their predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have all been shown to be noninferior to warfarin treatment for stroke prevention in respective phase 3 clinical trials; dabigatran and apixaban were shown to be superior to warfarin as preventive therapy. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban are all approved agents for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States and Europe. Among these agents, rivaroxaban is the only FDA-approved drug for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. This article reviews the major clinical trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of the new OACs and the use of these agents in special clinical situations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Approval; Europe; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thiophenes; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) face an elevated risk of stroke compared with patients who have normal sinus rhythm. Warfarin, an oral vitamin K antagonist, is a highly effective therapeutic agent to reduce stroke risk in patients with AF; however, use of warfarin is complicated by variable patient dose response due to genetic factors and multiple food-drug and drug-drug interactions. Novel oral anticoagulants appear to be a safe, effective alternative to warfarin therapy without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. Dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has been commercially available since 2010 for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF. More recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 2 oral activated factor X inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, for stroke prevention in patients with AF based on clinical trial evidence of their safety and efficacy. In this article, we provide an overview of the 3 novel oral anticoagulants for treating patients with AF and discuss the latest findings from subgroup analyses.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aging; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

For > 50 years, vitamin K antagonists were the only available oral drugs for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Recently, new oral anticoagulants (the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct activated factor X (factor Xa) inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban) have completed phase 3 clinical trials for the same indications. The direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in December 2012. In this article, we provide a comprehensive assessment of the safety and efficacy of the new oral anticoagulants. We focus primarily on the balance between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk and the implications of such risks in clinical practice. Bleeding and thromboembolic risk estimation tools and their roles in the correct utilization of new oral anticoagulation are also discussed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Until recently, it was widely accepted that patients with cirrhosis have a bleeding tendency related to the changes in the hemostatic system that occur as a consequence of the disease. However, it has now been well established that patients with cirrhosis are at risk for both bleeding and thrombotic complications. These thrombotic complications include portal vein thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and coronary or cerebrovascular infarctions. Antithrombotic drugs to prevent or treat thrombotic complications in patients with cirrhosis have been used only minimally in the past due to the perceived bleeding risk. As the thrombotic complications and the necessity of antithrombotic treatment in these patients are increasingly recognized, the use of antithrombotic drugs in this population is likely increasing. Moreover, given the rising incidence of fatty liver disease and generally longer survival times of patients with chronic liver diseases, it would be reasonable to presume that some of these thrombotic complications may be increasing in incidence over time. In this review, we will outline the indications for antithrombotic treatment in patients with cirrhosis. Furthermore, we will discuss the available antithrombotic drugs and indicate possible applications, advantages, and caveats. Since for many of these drugs very little experience in patients with cirrhosis exists, these data are essential in the design of future clinical and laboratory studies on mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of the various antithrombotic strategies in these patients.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Disease Progression; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Vitamin K

Although the use of dabigatran and rivaroxaban are increasing, data on the reversal of their effects are limited. The lack of reliable monitoring methods and specific reversal agents renders treatment strategies empirical, and as a result, treatment consists mainly of supportive measures. Therefore, we performed a systematic search of the PubMed database to find studies and reviews pertaining to oral anticoagulation reversal strategies. This review discusses current anticoagulation reversal recommendations for the oral anticoagulants warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban for patients at a heightened risk of bleeding, actively bleeding, or those in need of preprocedural anticoagulation reversal. We highlight the literature that shaped these recommendations and provide directions for future research to address knowledge gaps. Although reliable recommendations are available for anticoagulation reversal in patients treated with warfarin, guidance on the reversal of dabigatran and rivaroxaban is varied and equivocal. Given the increasing use of the newer agents, focused research is needed to identify effective reversal strategies and develop and implement an accurate method (assay) to guide reversal of the newer agents. Determining patient-specific factors that influence the effectiveness of reversal treatments and comparing the effectiveness of various treatment strategies are pertinent areas for future anticoagulation reversal research.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Anticoagulant prophylaxis with vitamin K antagonists (such as warfarin) is effective in reducing the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). New oral anticoagulants have emerged as potential alternatives to traditional oral agents. The purpose of this review was to summarise the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban in stroke prevention in patients with AF in phase III trials, evaluate their cost-effectiveness and consider the implications for primary care.. A literature search was performed between 2007 and 2012, selecting all phase III trials (ROCKET AF, RE-LY and ARISTOTLE) of new oral anticoagulants and relevant cost-benefit studies.. Evidence shows that all three agents are at least as effective as warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic emboli, with similar safety profiles. Cost-benefit studies of rivaroxaban and dabigatran further confirm their potential use as alternatives to warfarin in clinical practice. These observations may allow stratification of the general practice AF population, to help prioritise which patients may benefit from receiving a new oral anticoagulant.. The clinical and economic benefits of the new oral anticoagulants, along with appropriate risk stratification, may enable a higher number of patients with AF to receive effective and convenient prophylaxis for stroke prevention.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Primary Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Workload

Rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, is a new oral anticoagulant that has been developed as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists. However, its safety remains unclear. Reported randomized controlled trials comparing the safety of rivaroxaban with that of vitamin K antagonists (warfarin, acenocoumarol, phenprocoumon, and fluindione) were systematically searched. Inclusion was restricted to studies of ≥30 days' treatment duration. Safety end points examined included major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, as well as mortality. Data were pooled across randomized controlled trials using random-effects meta-analysis models. Five randomized controlled trials including 23,063 patients that met the inclusion criteria were identified. Patients received treatment for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n = 14,264), deep vein thrombosis (n = 3,967), or acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (n = 4,832). Overall, rivaroxaban was not associated with the risk of a composite end point of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (relative risk 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.06). However, rivaroxaban was associated with a significant decrease in fatal bleeding (relative risk 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.74). In 2 studies reporting intracranial bleeding events, rivaroxaban was associated with decreased risk compared with vitamin K antagonists. It was not associated with decreased risk for all-cause mortality (relative risk 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.09). In conclusion, with a decrease in fatal bleeding and no suggestion of an increase in all-cause mortality, rivaroxaban has a favorable safety profile with respect to bleeding.

Topics: Cause of Death; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Vitamin K

Chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexist, and data suggest that renal patients have AF rates in excess of double that encountered in the general population. These patients are at increased risk of stroke, regardless of the presence or absence of AF. Furthermore, a lower GFR causes increased thromboembolic risk in patients with AF - independent of other risk factors. The dilemma facing clinicians treating this cohort of patients is that renal insufficiency confers both a thromboembolic and a bleeding risk. Renal disease also commonly coexists with other risk factors for stroke and bleeding such as hypertension and advanced age. Furthermore, bleeding risk tracks stroke risk and many risk factors are common to both thromboembolism and haemorrhage. Patients with severe renal impairment are also actively excluded from the majority of trials for stroke prevention in AF, including those trials which informed the development of stroke risk factor scoring schemes. Therefore, patients with renal disease and AF present a unique management challenge. The available data suggests that the benefit from warfarin in terms of stroke reduction is not as clear as in the general population, and there is an increased risk of bleeding complications and even ectopic vascular calcification. Thus, it is problematic to extrapolate the benefits of warfarin in the general population to a subgroup that has been actively excluded from clinical trials. The new oral anticoagulants have relatively little data in patients with severe renal impairment, and all have an element of renal excretion. There is a need for large randomised control trials in patients with renal insufficiency and on haemodialysis to provide a bank of high-quality scientific data on which clinicians can base their management decisions. Until then, we must adopt a pragmatic approach which involves careful consideration of the relative risk of stroke and bleeding in each individual patient.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Disease Management; Embolism; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Warfarin

Dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban have been approved for primary and secondary stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, questions have arisen about how to manage emergency situations, such as when thrombolysis would be required for acute ischemic stroke or for the managing intracranial or gastrointestinal bleedings. We summarize the current literature and provide recommendations for the management of these situations. Peak plasma levels of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban are observed about 2-4 h after intake. Elimination of dabigatran is mainly dependent on renal function. Consequently, if renal function is impaired, there is a risk of drug accumulation that is highest for dabigatran followed by rivaroxaban and then apixaban and thus dosing recommendations are different. To date, no bedside tests are available that reliably assess the anticoagulatory effect of DOACs, nor are specific antidotes available. We recommend performing the following tests if DOAC intake is unknown: dabigatran-associated bleeding risk is minimized or can be neglected if thrombin time, Hemoclot test, or Ecarin clotting time is normal. Apixaban and rivaroxaban effects can be ruled out if findings from the anti-factor Xa activity test are normal. High plasma levels of DOAC are also mostly excluded if PTT and PTZ are normal four or more hours after DOAC intake. However, normal values of global coagulation tests are not sufficient if thrombolysis is indicated for treating acute stroke. The decision for or against thrombolysis is an individual decision; in these cases, thrombolysis use is off-label. In case of bleeding, prothrombin complex concentrates seems to be the most plausible treatment. For severe gastrointestinal bleeding with life-threatening blood loss, the bleeding source needs to be identified and treated by invasive measures. Use of procoagulant drugs (antifibrinolytics) might also be considered. However, there is very limited clinical experience with these products in conjunction with DOAC.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

Rivaroxaban is the first agent available within a new class of anticoagulants called direct factor Xa inhibitors. Rivaroxaban is approved for use in the United States for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing total hip replacement and total knee replacement, for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and for the reduction in risk of recurrence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (with additional indications under review). Rivaroxaban dose and frequency of administration vary depending on the indication. As of result of predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, a fixed dose of rivaroxaban is administered without routine coagulation testing. Rivaroxaban has a short half-life, undergoes a dual mode of elimination (hepatic and renal), and is a substrate for P-glycoprotein. Rivaroxaban has a lower potential for drug interactions compared with warfarin. Despite the advantages of a once/day fixed-dose oral agent, in many clinical situations limited evidence is available to guide optimal management of rivaroxaban therapy. In this article, we review the available evidence and provide recommendations where possible for such situations including the desire to monitor the anticoagulation intensity, use in special patient populations, managing drug interactions, and transitioning across anticoagulant agents. Potential strategies for reversing rivaroxaban's anticoagulant effect are reviewed. Health systems will need to perform a systematic safety evaluation and ensure that numerous hospital policies related to anticoagulation are updated to include rivaroxaban. A comprehensive approach to education is needed for clinicians, patients, and technical support personnel involved in patient interactions to ensure safe use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Body Weight; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

Antithrombotic trials in venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention, including those evaluating the new oral anticoagulants, have typically evaluated thromboembolism risk as an efficacy endpoint and bleeding risk as a separate safety endpoint. Findings often occur in opposition (i.e. decreased thromboembolism accompanied by increased bleeding, or vice-versa), leading to variable interpretation of the results, which may ultimately be judged as equivocal. In this paper, we offer an alternative to traditional designs based on the concept of a bivariate primary endpoint that accounts for simultaneous effects on antithrombotic efficacy and harm due to bleeding. We suggest a bivariate endpoint as a general approach to the assessment of 'net clinical benefit' in recently published trials and to the design of future trials. Lastly, we illustrate the bivariate endpoint design using two examples: a recently published superiority trial of rivaroxaban (RECORD1) and an ongoing non-inferiority trial of the duration of anticoagulant therapy in children with venous thrombosis (Kids-DOTT).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Orally administered anticoagulants that offer alternatives to warfarin have been developed in recent years and are currently available for reduction of stroke risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee replacement surgery, and the treatment and secondary risk reduction of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.. This article will provide a brief introduction to these new oral anticoagulants and then review the approaches that can be taken for the emergency management of hemostasis in patients bleeding or at risk for bleeding while receiving warfarin or one of two newer agents, the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran or the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban.. Oral anticoagulant use is widespread and likely to continue to increase. Warfarin has been the standard of care in oral anticoagulation for many years; its bleeding risks are well known and associated emergency protocols are well established. As newer oral anticoagulants become more widely used, similar procedures will need to be developed. Although there are as yet no specific reversal agents for these newer drugs, recommendations for overdose, emergency hemostasis, and preoperative management are available. Further, while the newer agents do not require routine coagulation monitoring, assays for use in non-routine situations are being explored.. The introduction of alternative oral anticoagulants will require emergency procedures that differ in some respects from those currently in place for warfarin and it will be necessary for Emergency Medicine professionals to become familiar with these procedures. Clinical stabilization of the bleeding or at-risk patient remains the emergency physician's priority.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Emergency Service, Hospital; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Warfarin

The primary objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Secondary objectives related to assessing the cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants stratified by center-specific time in therapeutic range, age, and CHADS2 score.. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Analysis used a Markov cohort model that followed patients from initiation of pharmacotherapy to death. Transition probabilities were obtained from a concurrent network meta-analysis. Utility values and costs were obtained from published data. Numerous deterministic sensitivity analyses and probabilistic analysis were conducted.. The incremental cost per QALY gained for dabigatran 150 mg versus warfarin was $20,797. Apixaban produced equal QALYs at a higher cost. Dabigatran 110 mg and rivaroxaban were dominated by dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban. Results were sensitive to the drug costs of apixaban, the time horizon adopted, and the consequences from major and minor bleeds with dabigatran. Results varied by a center's average time in therapeutic range, a patient's CHADS2 score, and patient age, with either dabigatran 150 mg or apixaban being optimal.. Results were highly sensitive to patient characteristics. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran 110 mg were unlikely to be cost-effective. For different characteristics, apixaban or dabigatran 150 mg were optimal. Thus, the choice between these two options may come down to the price of apixaban and further evidence on the impact of major and minor bleeds with dabigatran.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants, including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, have been recently approved for primary and secondary prophylaxis of thromboembolic conditions. However, there is no clear strategy for managing and reversing their anticoagulant effects. We aimed to summarize the available evidence for clinical management and reversal of bleeding associated with new oral anticoagulants. Using a systematic review approach, we aimed to identify studies describing reversal strategies for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. The search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, and grey literature. We included laboratory and human studies. We included 23 studies reported in 37 out of 106 potentially relevant references. Four studies were conducted in humans and the rest were in vitro and in vivo studies. The majority of the studies evaluated the use of prothrombinase complex concentrate (PCC), either activated or inactivated, and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). Other interventions were also identified. Laboratory studies suggest that hemostatic parameters and bleeding might be partially or completely corrected by PCC for rivaroxaban better than dabigatran. Studies in humans suggest that PCC might reverse the effects of rivaroxaban better than dabigatran assessed by hemostatic tests. We were not able to locate studies evaluating the clinical efficacy of these agents. The best available evidence suggests that PCC (activated or inactivated) might be the best option for reversing new anticoagulants. Evidence for rFVIIa is less compelling. There might be differences in the efficacy of reversing agents for different anticoagulants. Studies assessing the clinical efficacy of these reversal agents are urgently needed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Disease Management; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

The new oral anticoagulants dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa), rivaroxaban (Xarelto), and apixaban (Eliquis) have predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and are alternatives to warfarin. However, many physicians are wary of these drugs, since there is limited evidence on how to manage bleeding in patients taking them, and since no specific antidote is known to reverse their anticoagulant effect. Management requires careful adherence to first principles of bleeding care. Unapproved and untested reversal strategies may be required in patients with life-threatening bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Hemorrhage; Hemostatic Techniques; Humans; Morpholines; Perioperative Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

New direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOAC) are currently licensed for thromboprophylaxis after hip and knee arthroplasty and for long-term prevention of thromboembolic events in non-valvular atrial fibrillation as well as treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism. Some other medical indications are emerging. Thus, anaesthesiologists are increasingly likely to encounter patients on these drugs who need elective or emergency surgery. Due to the lack of experience and data, the management of DOAC in the perioperative period is controversial. In this article, we review available information and recommendations regarding the periprocedural management of the currently most clinically developed DOAC, apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. We discuss two trends of managing patients on DOAC for elective surgery. The first is stopping the DOAC 1-5 days before surgery (depending on the drug, patient and bleeding risk) without bridging. The second is stopping the DOAC 5 days preoperatively and bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin. The management of patients on DOAC needing emergency surgery is also reviewed. As no data exist for the use of haemostatic products for the reversal of the anticoagulant effect in these cases, rescue treatment recommendations are proposed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anesthesiology; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Patient Safety; Perioperative Period; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban are oral anticoagulants used to prevent or treat thrombosis in a variety of situations. Like all anticoagulants, these drugs can provoke bleeding. How should patients be managed if bleeding occurs during dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban therapy? How can the risk of bleeding be reduced in patients who require surgery or other invasive procedures? To answer these questions, we reviewed the available literature, using the standard Prescrire methodology. In clinical trials, warfarin, enoxaparin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban were associated with a similar frequency of severe bleeding. Numerous reports of severe bleeding associated with dabigatran have been recorded since this drug was first marketed. Some situations are associated with a particularly high bleeding risk, including: even mild renal failure, advanced age, extremes in body weight and drug-drug interactions, particularly with antiplatelet agents (including aspirin), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and many drugs used in cardiovascular indications. In patients treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban, changes in the INR (international normalised ratio) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) do not correlate with the dose. In early 2013, there is still no routine coagulation test suitable for monitoring these patients; specific tests are only available in specialised laboratories. In early 2013 there is no antidote for dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban, nor any specific treatment with proven efficacy for severe bleeding linked to these drugs. Recommendations on the management of bleeding in this setting are based mainly on pharmacological parameters and on scarce experimen-Haemodialysis reduces the plasma concentration of dabigatran, while rivaroxaban and apixaban cannot be eliminated by dialysis. Prothrombin complex concentrates and recombinant activated factor VII seem to have little or no efficacy, and they carry a poorly documented risk of thrombosis. For patients undergoing surgery or other invasive procedures, clinical practice guidelines are primarily based on pharmacokinetic parameters and on extrapolation of data on vitamin K antagonists. The decision on whether or not to discontinue anticoagulation before the procedure mainly depends on the likely risk of bleeding. In patients at high risk of thrombosis, heparin can be proposed when the anticoagulant is withdrawn. In early 2013, difficulties in the management of bleedi

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Overdose; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

Warfarin and aspirin are used to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). There are inherent challenges with both treatments, including variable and inconsistent benefit and increased bleeding risks. The availability of new anticoagulants offers some alternatives.. A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis to evaluate direct and indirect treatment data including aspirin, warfarin apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban for the prevention of primary or secondary stroke in patients with AF.. A comprehensive, systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized trials comparing aspirin, warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in patients with AF requiring treatment for stroke prevention. Open-label and blinded designs were included if they evaluated any stroke or any bleeding event. Data on stroke and bleeding events were abstracted, verified, evaluated, scored, and entered into Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16 to generate a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Direct and indirect comparisons were evaluated, and we looked for inconsistency in closed loop structures. Data are reported as rate ratios with 95% credible intervals. In addition, we reviewed variance statistics and explored variance with node-splitting models.. Our literature search yielded 30 articles, 21 of which were included. All treatments except aspirin reduced the risk of any stroke compared with placebo. Warfarin (0.43 [0.33-0.57]), apixaban (0.37 [0.27-0.54]), dabigatran (0.34 [0.21-0.57]), rivaroxaban (0.36 [0.22-0.60]), and aspirin with clopidogrel (0.73 [0.53-0.99]) were more protective than aspirin alone. Warfarin and the new anticoagulants were similar in the reduction of stroke, vascular death, and mortality. There was no difference in major bleeding between any treatment group. There were more nonmajor bleeding events when comparing warfarin and apixaban (1.83 [1.05-4.03]); no other differences between warfarin and the other new anticoagulants were found.. This mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis found similarity between warfarin and the new anticoagulants with the exception of one comparison, in which warfarin was associated with more non-major bleeding than apixaban. Thus, the new anticoagulants are therapeutically comparable when warfarin is inappropriate.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Databases, Bibliographic; Double-Blind Method; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Traditional anticoagulants such as heparin and vitamin K antagonists have been the mainstay of antithrombotic therapy for many years. However, these drugs have a number of well-recognized drawbacks: unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparins and fondaparinux are administered parenterally, and vitamin K antagonists require routine coagulation monitoring. Novel, single-target oral anticoagulants have been developed that do not need routine coagulation monitoring, including the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Rivaroxaban is the most advanced in its clinical development. Across all ten Phase III/IV trials, rivaroxaban met the primary efficacy end points and generally had similar incidences of bleeding, with a comparable safety profile to standard-of-care.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Orally active small molecules that selectively and specifically inhibit coagulation serine proteases have been developed for clinical use. For some patients these oral direct inhibitors (ODIs) offer substantial benefits over oral vitamin K antagonists (VKA). However, for the majority of patients with good anticoagulant control with VKAs the advantages of the ODIs are primarily convenience and few drug interactions. The drugs are prescribed at fixed dose without the need for monitoring or dose adjustment in the majority of patients and the rapid onset of anticoagulation and short half-life make initiation and interruption of anticoagulation considerably easier than with VKAs. As yet, specific antidotes to ODIs are not available for clinical use but these are in development as rapid reversal agents. As with all anticoagulants produced so far, there is a correlation between intensity of anticoagulation and bleeding. Consequently, the need to consider the balance of benefit and risk in each individual patient is no less important than with VKA therapy. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been chosen for this review as examples of a thrombin inhibitor and an inhibitor of factor Xa respectively. The clinical application of these drugs is the focus of the review.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

In the past decade, several new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been studied and approved for the prophylaxis and treatment of arterial and venous thromboembolism. These agents were shown to be as effective as or better than warfarin and resulted in comparable or lower bleeding rates than warfarin. Specific antidotes for the reversal of the anticoagulant effect of these drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies against the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran or recombinant Xa-analog in the case of factor Xa inhibitors, are still being investigated in early clinical trials. In certain situations, as in case of emergency surgery or life-threatening major bleeding, a rapid reversal strategy is needed. Several non-specific prohemostatic agents or coagulation factor concentrates have been suggested as potential candidates for the reversal of NOACs, but the evidence supporting these agents was mainly derived from small animal studies, or is based on partial or complete correction of laboratory parameters in healthy volunteers treated with these agents. Activated prothrombin complex concentrate seems promising for the reversal of dabigatran, while non-activated prothrombin complex concentrates have potential for the reversal of anti-factor Xa. The risk of thromboembolic complications requires careful evaluation. In this article, the evidence- or the lack of it - supporting the use of the different prohemostatic agents for the management of bleeding and for reversal of the different classes of NOACs is discussed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Factors; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Morpholines; Prothrombin; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

New direct oral anticoagulants (NOAC), inhibitors of factor IIa or Xa, are expected to be widely used for the treatment of venous thromboembolic disease, or in case of atrial fibrillation. Such anticoagulant treatments are known to be associated with haemorrhagic complications. Moreover, it is likely that such patients on long-term treatment with NOAC will be exposed to emergency surgery or invasive procedures. Due to the present lack of experience in such conditions, we cannot make recommendations, but only propose management for optimal safety as regards the risk of bleeding in such emergency conditions. In this article, only dabigatran and rivaroxaban were discussed. For emergency surgery at risk of bleeding, we propose to dose the plasmatic concentration of drug. Levels inferior or equal to 30ng/mL for both dabigatran and rivaroxaban, should enable the realization of a high bleeding risk surgery. For higher concentration, it was proposed to postpone surgery by monitoring the evolution of the drug concentration. Action is then defined by the kind of NOAC and its concentration. If the dosage of the drug is not immediately available, proposals only based on the usual tests, PT and aPTT, also are presented. However, these tests do not really assess drug concentration or bleeding risk. In case of severe haemorrhage in a critical organ, it is proposed to reduce the effect of anticoagulant therapy using a nonspecific procoagulant drug (activated prothrombin concentrate, FEIBA, 30-50U/kg, or non-activated 4-factors prothrombin concentrates 50U/kg). For any other type of severe haemorrhage, the administration of such a procoagulant drug, potentially thrombogenic in these patients, will be discussed regarding concentration of NACO and possibilities for mechanical haemostasis.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Emergencies; Emergency Medical Services; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Humans; Morpholines; Perioperative Care; Rivaroxaban; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thiophenes; Thrombin

To summarise and compare the efficacy and safety of various oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and vitamin K antagonists) and antiplatelet agents (acetylsalicylic acid) for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism.. Systematic review and network meta-analysis.. Literature search using Medline (1950 to present), Embase (1980 to present), and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials using the OVID interface. Publications from potentially relevant journals were also searched by hand.. Randomised controlled trials of patients receiving anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs, or placebo or observation for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Selected outcomes were rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding. Two reviewers independently extracted data onto standardised forms.. 12 articles met our inclusion criteria, with 11,999 patients evaluated for efficacy and 12,167 for safety. All treatments reduced the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Compared with placebo or observation, vitamin K antagonists at a standard adjusted dose (target international normalised ratio 2.0-3.0) showed the highest risk difference (odds ratio 0.07; 95% credible interval 0.03 to 0.15) and acetylsalicylic acid showed the lowest risk difference (0.65; 0.39 to 1.03). Risk of major bleeding was higher with a standard adjusted dose of vitamin K antagonists (5.24; 1.78 to 18.25) than with placebo or observation. Fatal recurrent venous thromboembolism and fatal bleeding were rare. Detailed subgroup and individual patient level data were not available.. All oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents investigated in this analysis were associated with a reduced recurrence of venous thromboembolism compared with placebo or observation, although acetylsalicylic acid was associated with the lowest risk reduction. Vitamin K antagonists given at a standard adjusted dose was associated with the greatest risk reduction in recurrent venous thromboembolism, but also the greatest risk of major bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Morpholines; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombolytic Therapy; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Venous Thromboembolism

To review pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving new oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation.. A literature search was conducted via PubMed and the Cochrane database to identify DDI studies using the terms drug interactions, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Prescribing information and Food and Drug Administration briefing documents were used to supplement published data.. English publications identified on Medline from 2005 up to August 2013 and US prescribing information for approved oral anticoagulants.. Articles reviewed focused on drugs affecting the permeability glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux transporter protein and/or cytochrome P (CYP) 450 3A4 enzymes, and pharmacodynamic DDIs when drugs are administered concomitantly. Phase I DDI studies have reported pharmacokinetic DDIs mediated by P-gp alone (dabigatran etexilate) or in combination with CYP3A4 enzymes (rivaroxaban and apixaban). Dabigatran etexilate should not be administered with any P-gp inhibitor in patients with severe renal impairment. Briefing documents indicate that rivaroxaban and apixaban should not be used with drugs that are strong inhibitors of both P-gp and CYP3A4. DDI studies involving rifampicin suggest that rivaroxaban and apixaban should be avoided when strong inducers of P-gp and CYP3A4 are used concurrently. Concomitant use of apixaban and strong dual inhibitors of P-gp and CYP3A4 should be avoided or the dose reduced. Five randomized clinical trials report additive effects with rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban when used concomitantly with antiplatelet agents; bleeding rates have been found to be higher, especially with dual antiplatelet therapy.. Awareness of drugs that alter the function of the P-gp efflux transporter protein and CYP3A4 enzymes and provide additive effects should enable prescribers to anticipate and avoid potential DDIs involving the new oral anticoagulants. To this end, briefing documents and prescribing information have applied cautionary measures for individuals treated with these newer anticoagulants.

Topics: Anticoagulants; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

What is the correct use of established clotting factors, prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), and activated factor VII in bleeding complications of trauma, surgery, and old and new oral anticoagulants? How will new clotting factors, specifically the long-acting factors, change the hemostatic management of coagulation deficiency disorders? From bench to bedside, comparative coagulation studies and clinical trials of modified clotting factors are providing insights to help guide hemostatic management of congenital and acquired bleeding disorders. Comparative thrombin-generation studies and preclinical and clinical trials suggest that PCCs and fresh-frozen plasma are effective in reversing the anticoagulant effects of warfarin, yet there are few data to guide reversal of the new oral anticoagulants dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Although coagulation studies support the use of PCCs to reverse new oral anticoagulants, correlation with clinical response is variable and clinical trials in bleeding patients are needed. For congenital bleeding disorders, exciting new technologies are emerging from the bench. Data from clinical trials of molecularly modified coagulation factors with extended half-lives suggest the possibility of fewer infusions, reduced bleeds, and better quality of life in persons with hemophilia. Preclinical studies of other novel prohemostatic approaches for hemophilia and other congenital coagulation disorders include RNA interference silencing of antithrombin, monoclonal anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (anti-antibody, anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor) aptamer, bispecific anti-IXa/X antibody, and fucoidans. Understanding the comparative coagulation studies of established prohemostatic agents, the pharmacokinetics of new long-acting clotting factors, and their correlation with bleeding outcomes will provide opportunities to optimize the hemostatic management of both congenital and acquired hemostatic disorders.

Topics: Antibodies; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Factors; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor VIIa; Female; Half-Life; Hemophilia A; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; RNA Interference; Thiophenes

Novel oral anticoagulants that directly inhibit thrombin (dabigatran) or factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban) are currently available for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after orthopaedic surgery, treatment of acute VTE, and prevention of arterial thromboembolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. These agents offer advantages over VKAs, including rapid onset, shorter half-lives, fewer drug interactions, and lack of need for routine monitoring. However, there are no established agents to reverse their anticoagulant effect. We review the risk of bleeding with the novel oral anticoagulants and the limitations of conventional coagulation assays for measuring anticoagulant effect. We provide an approach to the management of patients with bleeding complications with evidence for various interventions for reversal, where available.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Morpholines; Plasma; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

Currently available anticoagulants utilized for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and prevention and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have proven effectiveness but are not optimally utilized because of barriers such as the need for subcutaneous administration and requisite routine laboratory monitoring. Rivaroxaban, a novel oral Xa inhibitor, is an alternative to standard therapies utilized for VTE prevention after elective orthopedic surgery, primary and secondary stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF, VTE treatment after an acute VTE event, and secondary prevention after the acute coronary syndromes (ACS).. This article reviews the pharmacology, efficacy, and tolerability of rivaroxaban for VTE prophylaxis in post-orthopedic surgery and medically ill patients, stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF, adjunctive therapy in patients with ACS, and VTE treatment.. International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and EMBASE were searched for English-only clinical trials and reviews published between 1970 and March 15, 2012. PubMed was searched for articles published between 1970 and June 30, 2012. Additional trials and reviews were identified from the citations of published articles.. Eighty-nine publications were identified: 10 clinical trials and 1 meta-analysis were used to obtain efficacy and tolerability data, and 1 analysis of pooled data from the clinical trials was included; 17 pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and drug-drug interaction studies were included; and 5 cost-analyses were reviewed. These data showed rivaroxaban to be noninferior to enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis of VTE after total knee and total hip replacement surgery. It was also shown to be noninferior to vitamin K antagonist therapy for primary and recurrent stroke prevention in nonvalvular AF as well as for the treatment of VTE after an acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. It also showed benefit in lowering the risk for major adverse cardiovascular events after ACS. Differences in major bleeding rates were not statistically significant between rivaroxaban and comparators across the various studies, with the exception of ACS, in which there were higher rates of non-coronary artery bypass graft surgery related bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage.. Based on the findings of the studies reported in this review, rivaroxaban is an effective option for the prevention of VTE after orthopedic surgery, stroke prevention for nonvalvular AF, and treatment of VTE. At this time, rivaroxaban cannot be recommended for secondary risk reduction after ACS because of the increased bleeding risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Orthopedic Procedures; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are novel anticoagulants that have been approved for the prevention of thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation. These medications are attractive to both patients and clinicians, as, unlike warfarin, they do not require laboratory monitoring or dietary restrictions. However, they carry bleeding risks similar to that of warfarin and are without a reliable reversal agent.. The objectives of this article are to 1) summarize the pivotal trials leading to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals of dabigatran (Pradaxa; Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT) and rivaroxaban (Xarelto; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Titusville, NJ); 2) present the limited data available regarding the management of bleeding patients on these agents; and 3) provide suggestions to guide emergency providers given the limited data.. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were approved based on large, non-inferiority trials comparing the new agents to warfarin with stroke or systemic embolism as the primary outcome. Traditional coagulation studies cannot be used to determine the degree of anti-coagulation produced by these agents. Fresh frozen plasma is unlikely to be effective in patients on these drugs who are acutely bleeding. Prothrombin complex concentrate can be considered in patients on rivaroxaban. Dabigatran is renally cleared, so dabigatran could be removed by hemodialysis. Theoretically, DDAVP (Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Bridgewater, NJ), aminocaproic acid, tranexamic acid, or recombinant activated factor VII could also be used in an attempt to control bleeding.. There is a need for assays for the degree of anticoagulation produced by drugs such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Additionally, studies are needed to evaluate reversal agents that could be effective in the setting of acute bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Approval; Emergencies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Warfarin

Warfarin has long been considered the gold standard for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, three major trials comparing the efficacy and safety of new drugs: a thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and two inhibitors of factor Xa - rivaroxaban and apixaban, with that of warfarin, have been published. The aim of this paper is to present the main results of the RE-LY, ROCKET AF and ARISTOTLE trials, compare study populations and outcomes, and discuss clinical implications of their results for the long-term anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

After more than 50 years of thrombosis treatment and prophylaxis being based on heparin and vitamin K antagonists, a new generation of oral, direct anticoagulants is now available. The past 5 years have brought a strikingly large number of trials that evaluated these new oral anticoagulants in a range of clinical trials, particularly nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, thrombosis prophylaxis after major joint replacement surgery, treatment of venous thromboembolic events, and, most recently, acute coronary syndrome. These studies have been notably similar in design between the drugs for specific indication. This review focuses on the 3 drugs that either have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (dabigatran and rivaroxaban) or have the most mature phase III clinical data (apixaban).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Orthopedic Procedures; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The present systematic review was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of apixaban versus other anticoagulants, for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Electronic databases were interrogated to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. A series of direct/indirect comparisons and a network meta-analysis were conducted. Indirect comparisons found that the odds ratio of "all VTE and all-cause death" were significantly higher for dabigatran than for apixaban in patients with THR (odds ratio [OR], 2.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-4.21) and TKR (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.22-2.42). Rivaroxaban showed similar efficacy to apixaban in patients with THR and TKR (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.38-1.25 and OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.57-1.19, respectively). No significant differences were observed in bleeding outcomes between treatments. The novel anticoagulants apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran demonstrated similar or improved efficacy and similar safety compared with current therapies in this indication.

Topics: Antithrombins; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have become available for different clinical indications such as the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after major orthopaedic surgery, for the treatment of VTE and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). One thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran etexilate) and two factor Xa-inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban) are the most advanced NOACs and therefore, up-to-date information on their evidence and use in clinical practice appears timely. In this review we give a concise overview of the pharmacology and clinical evidence derived from phase 3 clinical trials. Then the meaningfulness of laboratory testing is discussed and recommendations are given for clinical scenarios that may necessitate adjustment of their use. We conclude that NOACs are valuable alternatives to heparins or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the prevention and treatment of VTE and for the prevention of stroke in patients with AF. Prescribers should however be aware of special situations and patient populations where the manufacturers' instructions need to be carefully followed. In particular, patients with comorbidities and co-medications may require individual decision making in order to prevent bleeding complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thromboembolism

Platelet inhibitors and anticoagulants are called antithrombotic drugs. New platelet inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor are more effective than the traditional clopidogrel, but their use is also accompanied by more frequent bleeding complications. Varfarin has gained true competitors; new oral anticoagulants include dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban. New anticoagulants are easier to use but clearly more expensive. The use of new anticoagulants is also accompanied by several potential problems that the clinician should be aware of.

Topics: Adenosine; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

As the population ages, the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to rise. The most feared complication of this common cardiac arrhythmia is cardioembolic stroke. Strokes related to AF are associated with greater morbidity and mortality than ischemic strokes of most other etiologies and impose a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems around the world. Until recently, warfarin was the sole anticoagulant proven effective for stroke prevention patients with AF at elevated risk, but its narrow therapeutic margin and variable dose response limited clinical utility. The emergence of new anticoagulants that offer equal or superior efficacy, greater safety and the convenience of fixed oral dosing may make warfarin the less preferred option. This review provides an update on recent advancements in antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Guideline Adherence; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Morpholines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, are considered to be the treatment of choice to prevent thromboembolic events, but problems, such as the need for frequent dose adjustment and monitoring of coagulation status, as well as multiple drug and food interactions, make their use difficult for both physician and patient. Two new anticoagulants are now being considered as possible replacements of vitamin K antagonists. Dabigatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor has already been approved in the USA for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, and dabigatran are licensed in Europe and Canada for short-term thromboprophylaxis after elective hip or knee replacement surgery. The advantages of these drugs are that they are safe and effective, require no monitoring, have a direct mode of action against only one clotting factor (thrombin or factor Xa), have limited drug interactions, and have rapid peak blood levels. Based on the fact that dabigatran has already been approved for use in the USA, it would appear that it has an advantage over rivaroxaban in becoming the replacement drug for vitamin K antagonists.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastritis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Liver; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

The vitamin K antagonists (VKA) available for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation have many drawbacks due to their difficult clinical use and high risk of bleeding. Currently, several drugs are being developed as possible substitutes for VKA that have many advantages such as the lack of monitoring requirement and scarce pharmacologic and food interactions. The present article provides an update on the new oral anticoagulants that are in a more advanced stage of clinical research, their pharmacologic properties, advantages and disadvantages and their results in recent clinical trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Drugs, Investigational; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Patient Care Planning; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Vitamin K

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) cause cessation of myocardial blood flow leading to coronary ischemia. The standard medical treatment includes heparin or low molecular weight heparin in the hospital, antiplatelet agents in the hospital and long term, and occasionally warfarin long term. All of these therapies are associated with bleeding complications. Furthermore, warfarin, with its narrow therapeutic window and need for frequent laboratory monitoring, poses several disadvantages. The development of novel oral factor Xa inhibitors and oral direct thrombin inhibitors may provide an alternative to warfarin. In this review, we discuss the new agents, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, for the potential treatment of ACS. We also review the relevant clinical trials evaluating their effects in ACS. These novel anticoagulants allow convenience of use with no requirement for laboratory monitoring and limited drug interactions, which may provide multifaceted treatment options for ACS and anticoagulation in the future.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulant drugs are emerging as alternatives to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Two agents are direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban and apixaban), and the third is a direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran). They have been separately compared to warfarin in large randomised trials. Our objective was to indirectly compare the three agents to each other for major efficacy and safety outcomes. Studies were assessed for comparability and the odds ratios of selected outcomes for each anticoagulant versus one another were estimated indirectly. The three cohorts differed significantly in terms of CHADS(2) score and the number of individuals with a past history of stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism. The estimated odds ratio of stroke or systemic embolism was 1.35 for rivaroxaban vs dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.04), 0.97 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.81), 1.22 for apixaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.18), 0.88 for apixaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.34) and 0.90 for apixaban versus rivaroxaban (p=0.43). The estimated odds ratio of major bleeding was 1.10 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.36), 1.28 for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.02), 0.74 for apixaban versus dabigatran 150 mg (p=0.004), 0.87 for apixaban versus dabigatran 110 mg (p=0.17) and 0.68 for apixaban versus rivaroxaban (p<0.001). In conclusion, the available data indicate no significant difference in efficacy between dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. It appears however that apixaban is associated with less major bleeding than dabigatran 150 mg or rivaroxaban and that rivaroxaban is less effective than dabigatran 150 mg in preventing stroke or systemic embolism. Such an indirect comparison should be used only to generate hypotheses which need to be tested in a dedicated randomised trial comparing the three drugs directly.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Morpholines; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Vitamin K; Warfarin

In this overview we address the three phase III studies that compared new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) with warfarin in the setting of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Strengths and weaknesses of the studies were examined in detail through indirect comparison. We analyze and comment the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the characteristics of randomized patients, the primary efficacy and safety end points and side effects. All new oral anticoagulants resulted in being non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists in reducing stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran 150 mg and apixaban were superior to vitamin K antagonists. Importantly, new oral anticoagulants significantly reduced hemorrhagic stroke in all three studies. Major differences among new oral anticoagulants include the way they are eliminated and side effects. Both dabigatran and apixaban were tested in low- to moderate-risk patients (mean CHADS2 [Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke] score = 2.1-2.2) whereas rivaroxaban was tested in high-risk patients (mean CHADS2 score = 3.48) and at variance with dabigatran and apixaban was administered once daily. Apixaban significantly reduced mortality from any cause. The choice of a new oral anticoagulant should take into account these and other differences between the new drugs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Patient Safety; Preventive Health Services; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Decision Support Techniques; Health Status Indicators; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Elective Surgical Procedures; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Medical Records; Morpholines; Perioperative Period; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

New oral anticoagulant (NOAC) regimens [dabigatran 150 mg (D150) and 220 mg (D220), rivaroxaban 10 mg (R20), and apixaban 2.5 mg bid (A5)] were effective and safe compared to enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following elective total knee (TKR) or hip replacement (THR) surgery. First a cluster analysis was used to identify homogeneous studies for the trial programs of each NOAC. Second, only studies reporting VTE and VTE-related death, major bleeding, and mortality were included. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for each NOAC regimen versus the comparator. Third, these data were used for the indirect comparison between NOACs. Cluster analysis identified duration of treatment (10 ± 5 and 34 ± 5 days) as the only homogeneous parameter across all NOAC programs (p>0.05) except for A5 and VTE over 10 ± 5 days (analysis not performed). The results of the calculated OR and 95% CI of the four NOAC regimens over 10 ± 5 and 34 ± 5 days showed inferiority of D150 and D220 compared to R10 for VTE (p<0.01, p<0.001). Comparisons of major bleeding and mortality were not different for all indirect comparisons. Despite the lack of standard definitions for VTE and bleeding outcomes, cluster analysis seems to be an appropriate tool to identify homogeneity across trial programs and to perform an indirect comparison for NOACs for prevention of VTE following TKR and THR surgery.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Endpoint Determination; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Orally active direct inhibitors of thrombin and factor Xa have now been approved for treatment or prevention of deep vein thrombosis,and stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. The factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, has shown promising results in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome but is not yet approved for that indication. These agents share a rapid onset and are cleared with half lives of approximately 10 hours. At present there is no approved antidote for either class of anticoagulant, making the treatment of life-threatening bleeding episodes problematic. These agents have fewer drug interactions than warfarin, have a predictable clearance, and hence do not require monitoring. Patients with renal insufficiency have delayed clearance and hence may have elevated levels of the drug leading to increased risk of bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Half-Life; Hemorrhage; Humans; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thrombosis

The incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation are quickly increasing, mainly due to the ageing of the population. Atrial fibrillation is, to date, a problem of public health. Atrial fibrillation is associated to a five-fold risk of stroke, which may be identified by score risks, such as CHADS(2) score. The classical antithrombotic treatment of atrial fibrillation is based on vitamin K antagonists. Trials made in the 90's have clearly shown that vitamin K antagonists were able to decrease stroke risk by about 60%. New oral anticoagulants are now available on the market to treat patients with atrial fibrillation. These drugs are dabigatran which has demonstrated an interest in the RE-LY trial. Two doses may be prescribed, 110 mg bid and 150 mg bid. Anti Xa have also demonstrated an interest : rivaroxaban in the ROCKET AF trial and apixaban in the AVERROES (versus aspirin) and ARISTOTLE trials. In the future these drugs will have a major place in the armamentarium used to treat patients with atrial fibrillation. In all these trials a decrease in intra cranial haemorrhages has been demonstrated. In the everyday practice it will be necessary to be very cautious in patients with impaired renal function, as all these drugs are eliminated by kidneys.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

New oral anticoagulants are ready to enter the scene on a massive basis for the treatment/prophylaxis of many cardiovascular diseases. Although they can be prescribed without dose-adjustment based on laboratory testing, the laboratory is still an essential partner that may assist clinicians for the management of anticoagulated patients. In principle, there are many tests that can be used to evaluate the anticoagulant effect of the new drugs, but the choice should be made among those that are more readily available in emergency and that are easy to run. Linearity of dose-response and responsiveness to increasing dose in addition to standardization are other important issues to consider. This article is aimed at reviewing the current tests, their characteristics and the most appropriate choice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

New oral anticoagulants such as the factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban or the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran lack some of the limitations of the well-known vitamin K-antagonists. Although routine monitoring is not required, large variations in overall exposure can be seen under certain circumstances. Dabigatran is primarily eliminated in unchanged form in the urine and dose has to be adapted according to renal function. The factor Xa inhibitors are CYP3A4-substrates and combination with potent CYP3A4-inhibitors is not allowed. In cases of bleeding or thromboembolic events under treatment, targeted monitoring of drug concentration or anti-FXa- or anti-FIIa-activity may be helpful to identify the underlying cause. In contrast to vitamin K antagonists or heparin, no antidotes are available for the new anticoagulants and the optimal procedure in cases of life-threatening bleeding has not yet been defined. For certain indications such as prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients study data are (not yet) available. Concerning localization of bleeding sites the new compounds may display a different profile compared to vitamin K-antagonists (less intracranial bleedings). Experience with long-term use (> 5 years) is limited. Therefore careful clinical monitoring of patients considering co-medication and co-morbidity is necessary to allow safe therapy with the new oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) continue to be at risk for recurrent ischemic events, despite an early invasive strategy and the use of dual antiplatelet therapy. The anticoagulant pathway remains activated for a prolonged period after ACS and, consequently, has been a target for treatment. Early studies with warfarin indicated its benefit, but the risk of bleeding and the complexities of warfarin anticoagulation resulted in little use of this strategy. Rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran are new specific inhibitors of anticoagulant factors (Xa or IIa) currently available for the prevention of thrombosis and/or thromboembolism. Thus far, studies with dabigatran and apixaban in ACS have shown no clinical benefit and bleeding has been increased. The ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 trial observed the impact of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg and 5 mg twice daily in patients with recent ACS receiving current management (both early invasive strategy and dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel) over a follow-up period of over 1 year. Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily reduced cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke by 16%, and both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality by approximately 20%. Although major bleeding increased from 0.6% to 2.1% and intracranial hemorrhage from 0.2% to 0.6%, there was no increase in fatal bleeding. The role of rivaroxaban in the management of ACS is discussed in this review. The reduction in mortality is the main finding that could lead to the use of rivaroxaban in the management of ACS in high-risk individuals with a low bleeding risk.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Morpholines; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy is a situation that occurs frequently and requires consideration of the patient, the procedure, and an expanding array of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents. Preoperative assessment must address each patient's risk for thromboembolic events balanced against the risk for perioperative bleeding. Procedures can be separated into those with a low bleeding risk, which generally do not require complete reversal of the antithrombotic therapy, and those associated with an intermediate or high bleeding risk. For patients who are receiving warfarin who need interruption of the anticoagulant, consideration must be given to whether simply withholding the anticoagulant is the optimal approach or whether a perioperative "bridge" with an alternative agent, typically a low-molecular-weight heparin, should be used. The new oral anticoagulants dabigatran and rivaroxaban have shorter effective half-lives, but they introduce other concerns for perioperative management, including prolonged drug effect in patients with renal insufficiency, limited experience with clinical laboratory testing to confirm lack of residual anticoagulant effect, and lack of a reversal agent. Antiplatelet agents must also be considered in the perioperative setting, with particular consideration given to the potential risk for thrombotic complications in patients with coronary artery stents who have antiplatelet therapy withheld.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Perioperative Care; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Vitamin K

Rivaroxaban and dabigatran are the new anticoagulant drugs--factor Xa and IIa inhibitors. Recently registered in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease became the serious competition to other anticoagulants. Blood coagulation parameters do not need to be monitored which can be seen as a huge advantage. At the same time their effectiveness in thromboembolic incidents prevention is comparable and the risk of serious hemorrhage is even lower comparing to therapy with vitamin K antagonists. Concerns arose around the fact that for the time being there is no effective antidote in case of intoxication and no possibility of quick reversal in case of hemorrhage or surgery. The purpose of this paper is to summarize current knowledge regarding the safety of new anticoagulants, and to answer the question--are we really prepared for them?

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Prothrombin; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are new oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis after elective orthopaedic surgery. We aimed to systematically compare their relative benefits and harms through meta-analysis, and adjusted indirect comparison.. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, trial registries and regulatory documents through May 2009 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of dabigatran (150 and 220 mg daily) and rivaroxaban (10 mg daily) compared with enoxaparin (40-60 mg daily) in elective orthopaedic surgery. We used random effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the outcomes of total venous thromboembolism, VTE (deep venous thrombosis, non-fatal pulmonary embolism and all-cause mortality), and haemorrhagic adverse events (major and clinically relevant non-major bleeds). Adjusted indirect comparison was used for the pooled RRs of dabigatran and rivaroxaban with enoxaparin as the common control.. Rivaroxaban was superior to enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromoboembolism (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.43-0.73, P<0.0001), with a trend for increased haemorrhage (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.94-1.69, P=0.13). Dabigatran was not superior to enoxaparin for prevention of VTE (RR 1.12, 95% 0.97-1.29, P=0.12), and did not reduce haemorrhage risk (RR 1.10, 95% 0.90-1.35, P=0.32). Adjusted indirect comparison showed that rivaroxaban was superior to dabigatran in preventing VTE, RR 0.50 (95% CI 0.37-0.68), but with a slight trend towards increased haemorrhage RR 1.14 (95% CI 0.80-1.64).. Rivaroxaban may be more effective than dabigatran for prevention of VTE after elective orthopaedic surgery but might also slightly increase the risk of haemorrhage.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Orthopedic Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

The marketing of new anticoagulant drugs has led us to review the development of rivaroxaban and apixaban (oral anti-Xa drugs) and dabigatran (an oral thrombin inhibitor). The results are different in terms of efficacy and tolerance. Each molecule has its own field of application but it is not at all certain that each will find its place. Though the results are favourable for these orally active drugs in the orthopaedic setting, it is clear that only cardiological applications will give a final green light for these products. The future will be fascinating in this regard.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Biological Availability; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Prothrombin; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban is the first orally bioavailable direct factor Xa inhibitor and its role in acute coronary syndrome is not fully understood. A significant residual risk of recurrent ischemia remains in patients with acute coronary syndrome despite optimal medical therapy. Warfarin has demonstrated modest benefit that is offset by the risk of bleeding and complexity in its management. Rivaroxaban may be an attractive agent for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes given its predictable pharmacodynamics and favorable safety profile.. The current guideline-based antithrombotic and adjunctive medical therapies in acute coronary syndrome are summarized in this review. Rivaroxaban's drug profile, its current applications, ongoing trials and experience in patients with acute coronary syndrome are also described.. Current experience of rivaroxaban in acute coronary syndrome demonstrates its safety and a trend towards benefit when added to current optimal medical therapy. The benefits were observed primarily in patients receiving aspirin monotherapy and increased bleeding among those receiving dual anti-platelet therapy. This suggests that there may be a narrow window between the optimal clinically achievable antithrombotic effect and the point where bleeding risk outweighs the benefits. Though promising, it remains to be seen if this drug will achieve the right balance between efficacy and bleeding risk.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Biological Availability; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

Newer therapeutic options available in the prevention of postoperative thromboembolism, currently focused on fondaparinux, rivaroxaban and dabigatran warrant an overall therapeutic assessment. The constitutive comparisons with enoxaparin are based on a combined outcome measure solely driven by the incidence of "asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis". Its validity as a clinically relevant endpoint is missing if antithrombotics of different classes are compared. This is because they target different phases of thrombogenesis i. e. ahead and beyond the asymptomatic stage of thrombosis. Additional concerns refer to the dosing-regimens and their practical administration: Fondaparinux, rivaroxaban and dabigatran are dosed to achieve maximum effects very close to their limits of tolerance whereas wide dosing spectra for the low molecular weight herparin (LMWH)'s indicate the potential for dose adaptation and increase. The other disadvantage to the control-heparin originates in the timing for the 1st administration which doesn't fit in with the "just-in-time" principle. So the enoxaparin-regimen is lacking in benchmark-quality - with the consequence that the meaning of the Phase III-trials does'nt go beyond a mere technical demarcation from the marketed variant of the product as defined by the stipulations in the package insert. As to tolerance the selective anticoagulants exhibit an increased risk of major and other clinically relevant bleeding, exceeding that of enoxaparin by 30% (P<0.001). The outcome of the meta-analyses on fondaparinux, rivaroxaban and dabigatran is supported by product-specific calculations and assessments of the European Medicine Equivalence Agency (EMEA). Rivaroxaban and dabigatran show significant age-dependent renal accumulation. Because the dose-finding studies were restricted to patients over 60 year old the regimens definitely established are not applicable to younger patients. The reason for the limited therapeutic index of the selective anticoagulants originates in their monovalent activity as such not adequately matching the complexity of thrombogenesis and early thrombus extension. Their class-specific limitations are compensated through more intensive dosage-regimens which result in accentuated bleeding complications. Connotatively the hypothesis emerged that antiXa- and IIa-effects interact synergistically which translates into enhanced efficacy and tolerance. Experimental studies on hirudin with pentasaccharide and hirudin with "lo

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Evidence-Based Medicine; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Polysaccharides; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Conventional anticoagulants have proven efficacy in the management of thromboembolism. Their adverse effects and a narrow therapeutic window, necessitating regular need for monitoring, however, have long been an incentive for the development of safer anticoagulants without compromising efficacy. Over the last decade or so several new parenteral and oral anticoagulants have been launched with efficacy comparable with conventional agents. From fondaparinux to its long acting derivative idraparinux, and the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban to the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, the advent of new anticoagulants is radically changing anticoagulation. For conventional anticoagulants, despite their shortcomings, effective methods of reversing their anticoagulant effects exist. Moreover, strategies to deal with the occurrence of fresh thrombotic events in the face of therapeutic anticoagulation with the conventional agents have also been addressed. Nevertheless, for the new anticoagulants, the optimal management of these complications remains unknown. This review explores these issues in the light of current evidence.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Treatment Failure

Rivaroxaban (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) is a highly selective direct inhibitor of factor Xa. It has completed Phase III clinical trials evaluating its efficacy and safety against enoxaparin in the prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) in orthopedic patients following primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Rivaroxaban has been extensively studied worldwide in 12,729 patients in the Regulation of Coagulation in Major Orthopedic Surgery Reducing the Risk of DVT and PE (RECORD) program. Pivotal clinical trials have demonstrated the superior efficacy in reducing total VTE in comparison with both the North American and European regimens of enoxaparin. Safety of the drug was found to be excellent, with no demonstrable cardiovascular or hepatic effects and no statistically significant increase in major bleeding. A pooled analysis of data collected on the patients from the four RECORD trials revealed rivaroxaban to be the first antithrombotic agent to demonstrate superiority over another antithrombotic (enoxaparin) in reducing symptomatic VTE and all-cause mortality. While there was a significant difference in the composite safety endpoint of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in the pooled analysis with the use of rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin, there was no significant difference in major bleeding or in any other bleeding.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Clinical Trials as Topic; Evidence-Based Medicine; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

The prevalence of obesity has increased substantially over recent years. Clinicians are increasingly being challenged with making uncertain anticoagulant dosing decisions, as the optimal dosing strategy for most anticoagulants in the obese patient population remains unknown. Research published to date suggests that the clearance of anticoagulants increases with weight. As obesity is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and arterial disease, there is an urgent need to establish appropriate anticoagulation regimens for this patient group. Research studies applying the method of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling and simulation could establish an appropriate evidence base and provide direction and reassurance to prescribing clinicians.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Morpholines; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Obesity; Polysaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thrombophilia; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists and heparins have been standard anticoagulation drugs over the past decades. They are effective and safe but they have several drawbacks which has led to the development of new oral anticoagulants. Dabigatran etexilate is a specific oral thrombin inhibitor and rivaroxaban and apixaban are oral inhibitors of factor Xa. These agents produce a predictable anticoagulant response after fixed-dose administration so that routine coagulation monitoring is unnecessary. Currently, dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban and apixaban are licensed for thromboprophylaxis after elective total hip or knee replacement surgery. Since august 2011, dabigatran etexilate is licensed for patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban will follow. However, indications will be expanded e.g. for therapy of venous thromboembolism. It is important to be aware of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of these new agents. The drugs considerably influence the global test of coagulation thus making an interpretation of test results difficult. Currently, there is a lack of suitable coagulation tests to monitor anticoagulation in emergency cases, such as bleeding. Specific antidotes are not yet available.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antithrombins; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Blood Coagulation Tests; Critical Care; Dabigatran; Drug Approval; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia; Vitamin K

To indirectly compare rivaroxaban and dabigatran for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) based on their pivotal efficacy/safety trials embracing a total of 20618 patients.. Pooled risk differences (RD) for rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin and dabigatran vs enoxaparin obtained from separate meta-analyses of two sets of trials were used to indirectly estimate RDs for rivaroxaban vs dabigatran.. Primary efficacy (any VTE+all-cause mortality) and safety (major bleeding) outcomes in enoxaparin arms largely differed across similarly designed rivaroxaban and dabigatran trials (differences in venography adjudication and bleeding events definitions). However, incidence of symptomatic VTE and incidence of major/non-major clinically relevant bleeding (including surgical site) were consistent in this respect. RDs (as percentages) for symptomatic VTE were: rivaroxaban-enoxaparin=-0.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.9 to 0.05); dabigatran-enoxaparin=-0.09% (95% CI, -1.0 to 0.8); rivaroxaban-dabigatran=-0.3% (95% CI, -1.3 to 0.7; P=0.275). RDs for major/clinically relevant bleeding were rivaroxaban-enoxaparin=0.99% (95%CI, 0.29 to 1.69); dabigatran-enoxaparin=0.02% (95% CI, -1.0 to 1.0); rivaroxaban-dabigatran=0.97 (95% CI, -0.43 to 2.37; P=0.085). Mortality rates (all-cause, VTE-related, bleeding-related) were very low not indicating differences between any two of the three treatments.. Methodological differences disable indirect comparisons of rivaroxaban vs dabigatran that would be based on major efficacy/safety outcomes of their pivotal trials. The two drugs do not seem to differ regarding incidence of symptomatic VTE. Risk of a relevant bleeding is higher with rivaroxaban than with enoxaparin and the same tendency exists also vs dabigatran. Direct rivaroxaban vs dabigatran comparisons in this setting are needed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Postoperative Care; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Safety; Survival Analysis; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban is a newly developed oral medicine that direct inhibits factor Xa for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin, a medicine routinely used for thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee arthroplasty.. We performed a meta-analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified in PubMed, Cochrane library, and Embase. The primary efficacy outcome for our meta-analysis was total venous thromboembolism (VTE) and all-cause mortality. The primary safety outcome was bleeding events, which were categorized as major, clinically relevant non-major, or minor events.. Eight RCTs, involving 15,586 patients, were included in our meta-analysis. Compared to enoxaparin, thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban was associated with significantly fewer VTE and all-cause mortality [9,244 patients, risk ratio (RR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.80] cases and a similar incidence of bleeding cases (major bleeding events: 13,384 patients, RR 1.65, 95% CI 0.93-2.93; clinically relevant non-major bleeding events: 13,384 patients, RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.98-1.50; total bleeding events, 13,384 patients, RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.97-1.24). The total hip or knee arthroplasty subgroup analysis revealed consistent efficacy and safety findings.. Rivaroxaban was more effective than the recommended dose of enoxaparin and had a similar safety profile for thromboprophylaxis after hip and knee arthroplasty.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Morpholines; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Odds Ratio; Primary Prevention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

An increasing number of patients receive anticoagulant therapy to prevent and treat arterial or venous thromboembolism. The major complication of anticoagulant therapy is the increase of the individual bleeding risk. All anticoagulant drugs can cause haemorrhages, that can sometimes be life-threatening. Although heparins and the vitamin K antagonists have been the most widely used anticoagulants for decades, the correct management of bleeding complications associated with these agents has been poorly studied. More recently, new anticoagulant drugs, both parenteral and oral, have been approved for clinical use. Currently, none of these new agents has a specific antidote, and little advise can be given on how to manage a major bleeding event. The aim of this article is to describe the haemorrhagic risk and the management of bleeding complications associated with the principal anticoagulant drugs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor VIIa; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Morpholines; Polysaccharides; Protamines; Recombinant Proteins; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Vitamin K

Current anticoagulant provision is dominated by parenteral low-molecular-weight heparin and oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), which indirectly inhibit several steps of the coagulation pathway. Two unmet needs for anticoagulation are safety and ease of use. Safety relates primarily to the incidence of major bleeding, which remains the key concern of orthopaedic surgeons and anaesthetists, over and above any efficacy advantage, and convenience of use, which centres on oral administration replacing the need for injections or monitoring platelets or coagulation with VKA. Recent research efforts towards identifying small-molecule inhibitors of coagulation enzymes as novel therapies for thrombotic disorders have been particularly successful in developing orally available molecules to directly inhibit the key proteases, factors IIa and Xa. Of the new oral anticoagulants in development, dabigatran etexilate (BIBR 1048) and rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939), which inhibit factors IIa and Xa, respectively, are the most advanced and were approved in Europe in 2008. Based on the available data, we can conclude that dabigatran etexilate is non-inferior to enoxaparin in terms of efficacy and safety, and two different doses (220 and 150 mg/day) have now been approved. The 150 mg/day dose is intended for elderly patients and those with moderate renal impairment, which allows clinicians to decrease the risk of bleeding in the increasing number of fragile patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery. In conclusion, rivaroxaban is superior in efficacy to enoxaparin, even with the US enoxaparin dosing regimen (30 mg b.i.d.), without significant differences in safety.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Orthopedic Procedures; Prothrombin; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Vitamin K

The overall thromboembolic risk is the resultant of patient-related risk and surgical risk. The surgical risk is decreasing, especially with the introduction of new procedures (fast-track surgery). The value of prophylaxis has been firmly established. Mechanical prophylaxis is to be used as first-line prophylaxis when there is a risk of bleeding. Combining this with drugs increases the antithrombotic efficacy. However, the effectiveness of prophylaxis on pulmonary embolism and mortality has not been demonstrated. Renal function needs to be evaluated when low molecular weight heparins, fondaparinux, rivaroxaban or dabigatran are prescribed. An age of over 75 years and low body weight (<50 kg) have to be taken into account. There is a risk of spinal or epidural hematoma in patients receiving anticoagulants. Caution should be taken especially when administering the newer agents. Patients undergoing surgery that involves a moderate or high overall risk should receive prophylaxis until full mobilization. Patients who have undergone a total hip replacement, surgery for hip fracture, or major abdominal surgery should receive prophylaxis for about 5 weeks longer. The relevance of distal vein thromboses is debated. Surrogate venographic end-points should be gradually replaced by a combination of ultrasound and clinical criteria. The new antithrombotic agents will probably modify prevention in the years to come but currently there are very few long-term data for these products for which - it should be reminded - no antagonists are available.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Combined Modality Therapy; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Polysaccharides; Postoperative Complications; Preanesthetic Medication; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stockings, Compression; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Thrombophlebitis; Vitamin K

The oral direct Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban (Xarelto) shows great promise for prevention of venous thromboembolic events after major elective orthopedic surgery. Its consistent and predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics across a wide range of patient populations allow administration with fixed dosing and with no coagulation monitoring. In 4 orthopaedic surgery clinical trials (12,700 patients), 10mg postoperative (6-10 hours after the end of surgery) dose, once daily, of oral rivaroxaban, achieved superior efficacy and similar safety to enoxaparin, whatever the dose of enoxaparin. Indeed, 40 mg once a day in Europe and 30 mg bid in US of enoxaparin were compared to the same dose of 10mg once daily of rivaroxaban. Furthermore, there is no difference according to liver enzymes elevation and cardio-vascular adverse events. Although the risk of spinal haematoma after neuraxial anaesthesia is rare, it is increased by concomitant use of anticoagulants. In orthopedic surgery trials with rivaroxaban to date, complications such as spinal haematoma have not been reported. The pharmacokinetic profile of rivaroxaban suggests that concurrent use with neuraxial anaesthesia should require no further precautions than currently necessary with low-molecular-weight heparin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hematoma, Epidural, Spinal; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Preanesthetic Medication; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban is the first oral anticoagulant with a direct anti-Xa activity to be registered (approval). As for all first comers in a class, it should be assessed both for itself and for the class. The targeting of factor-Xa factor, key component in the coagulation cascade, has the theoretical benefit of being an effective antithrombotic and a potential risk for hemorrhage, both highly dose-dependent. Experience has shown us that the representativeness and predictiveness of in vitro tests and preclinical models are only partial and sometimes even misleading. This is why the responses can only come from clinical trials and rigorous research testing doses, which should be conducted specifically in all the indications foreseen, with no extrapolations. The oral anticoagulant drugs are developed in the prevention of arterial thromboembolic events caused by atrial fibrillation too, where the vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the current standard of care. The well-known problems of monitoring and adaptation doses with VKAs have led to developing new replacement classes without the need for control or biological adaptation. However, in certain conditions there is a need to monitor the patient. The advantage for the direct anti-Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban is that the prothrombin time, a routine test is sensitive and provides a prolonged response that is proportional to the plasma concentration within a wide range of concentrations. This test is potentially usable provided that the indispensable standardization is forthcoming.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Molecular Structure; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Preanesthetic Medication; Prothrombin Time; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

In Western countries, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a widespread and serious disorder, with hospital admission rates that appear to be increasing. Current anticoagulant therapies available for the prevention and treatment of VTE have several drawbacks that make them either difficult to manage effectively, due to a need for careful monitoring to control coagulation, or, in the case of parenterally administered agents, inconvenient for long-term use. To address some of these issues, new anticoagulants are in clinical development that can be orally administered and directly target specific factors in the coagulation cascade. This article reviews the rationale behind development of these novel agents and provides a critical appraisal of their clinical potential. In addition, the impact that the introduction of such agents into clinical practice would have is discussed from the patient perspective.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzimidazoles; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Century; Humans; Medication Adherence; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban is a small molecule, direct Factor Xa inhibitor and may be a potentially attractive alternative to vitamin K antagonists. Rivaroxaban is being investigated for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thrombosis. A broad search of Medline, clinicaltrials.gov and the annual proceedings of the American Society of Hematology and the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis was conducted. This review addresses the findings of this systematic search, including the need for new oral anticoagulants, the development and pharmacology of rivaroxaban, and the results of completed as well as ongoing trials with rivaroxaban. At present, the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism has been evaluated in Phase II and Phase III trials involving over 24,000 patients. Additionally, rivaroxaban is being evaluated for the treatment of pulmonary embolism, secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes and the prevention of stroke and non-central nervous system embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The drug may have its greatest impact in providing a much-needed and attractive alternative to warfarin. Further data (especially large Phase III trials) are required.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Binding Sites; Clinical Trials as Topic; Comorbidity; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Rats; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This analysis of pooled results from two phase II studies of rivaroxaban for VTE prevention after major orthopaedic surgery aimed to strengthen the conclusions of the individual studies. One study was conducted in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR; N = 722), and one in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR; N = 621). In both studies, patients were randomized, doubleblind, to oral, twice-daily (bid) rivaroxaban beginning after surgery, or subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg once daily beginning before THR, and 30 mg bid beginning after TKR). Treatment continued until mandatory bilateral venography was performed 5-9 days after surgery. Total VTE (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality) occurred in 16.1-24.4% of per-protocol patients receiving rivaroxaban 5-60 mg, and 27.8% receiving enoxaparin (n = 914). There was a flat dose response relationship between rivaroxaban and total VTE (p = 0.39). Major bleeding (safety population, n = 1,317) increased dose-dependently with rivaroxaban (p < 0.001), occurring in 0.9%, 1.3%, 2.1%, 3.9%, and 7.0% of patients receiving rivaroxaban total daily doses of 5, 10, 20, 40, and 60 mg, respectively, versus 1.7% of patients receiving enoxaparin. No routine coagulation monitoring was performed, and there were no significant differences between dose response relationships with rivaroxaban after THR and TKR. Overall, rivaroxaban total daily doses of 5-20 mg had the most favorable balance of efficacy and safety, relative to enoxaparin, for the prevention of VTE after major orthopaedic surgery.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enoxaparin; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Phlebography; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Angina, Unstable; Anticoagulants; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Benzylamines; Brain Ischemia; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coumarins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Forecasting; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Hirudins; Humans; Morpholines; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Polysaccharides; Prothrombin; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Thrombophilia; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is caused by the obstruction of the main pulmonary artery due to thrombosis and vascular remodeling. Regarding the need for anticoagulant therapy in CTEPH patients, this study aimed to compare rivaroxaban with warfarin in terms of its efficacy and safety in patients undergoing endarterectomy surgery.. The study was a parallel clinical trial in patients who underwent endarterectomy following CTEPH. A total of 96 patients were randomly selected and assigned to two groups: warfarin-treated (control) and rivaroxaban-treated (intervention). Patients were clinically assessed for re-thrombosis, re-admission, bleeding, and mortality in the first, third, and sixth months after surgery.. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of thrombosis between the two groups within the first, third-, and sixth-months post-surgery (p=0.52, 1, 0.38 respectively). Moreover, the mortality rate (p=0.9), bleeding rate (p=0.06), and re-admission rate (p=0.15) showed no significant differences between the two groups.. Rivaroxaban may be as effective as warfarin in treating CTEPH patients after endarterectomy in the short term and can be used as an anticoagulant in these patients. However, studies with long-term follow-ups are needed to consolidate the strategy of treating these patients with rivaroxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Chronic Disease; Endarterectomy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) requiring lower extremity revascularization (LER) have a high risk of adverse limb and cardiovascular events. The results from the VOYAGER PAD (efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in reducing the risk of major thrombotic vascular events in subjects with symptomatic peripheral artery disease undergoing peripheral revascularization procedures of the lower extremities) trial have demonstrated that rivaroxaban significantly reduced this risk with an overall favorable net benefit for patients undergoing surgical revascularization. However, the efficacy and safety for those treated by surgical bypass, including stratification by bypass conduit (venous or prosthetic), has not yet been described.. In the VOYAGER PAD trial, patients who had undergone surgical and endovascular infrainguinal LER to treat PAD were randomized to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily or placebo on top of background antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 100 mg to be used in all and clopidogrel in some at the treating physician's discretion) and followed up for a median of 28 months. The primary end point was a composite of acute limb ischemia, major amputation of vascular etiology, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding using the TIMI (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) scale. The index procedure details, including conduit type (venous vs prosthetic), were collected at baseline.. Among 6564 randomized patients, 2185 (33%) had undergone surgical LER. Of these 2185 patients, surgical bypass had been performed for 1448 (66%), using a prosthetic conduit for 773 patients (53%) and venous conduit for 646 patients (45%). Adjusting for the baseline differences and anatomic factors, the risk of unplanned limb revascularization in the placebo arm was 2.5-fold higher for those receiving a prosthetic conduit vs a venous conduit (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-3.90; P < .001), and the risk of acute limb ischemia was three times greater (adjusted HR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.84-5.11; P < .001). The use of rivaroxaban reduced the primary outcome for the patients treated with bypass surgery (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98), with consistent benefits for those receiving venous (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.96) and prosthetic (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66-1.15) conduits (P. Surgical bypass with a prosthetic conduit was associated with significantly higher rates of major adverse limb events relative to venous conduits even after adjustment for patient and anatomic characteristics. Adding rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily to aspirin or dual antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced this risk, with an increase in the bleeding risk, but had a favorable benefit risk for patients treated with bypass surgery, regardless of conduit type. Rivaroxaban should be considered after lower extremity bypass for symptomatic PAD to reduce ischemic complications of the heart, limb, and brain.

Topics: Aspirin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Lower Extremity; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

The evaluation and management of patients who sustain recurrent thromboembolic events while taking therapeutic anticoagulation have not been well characterized; moreover, there has been no systematic review or randomized trial focused on treating patients with recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) during anticoagulant treatment. Therefore, we developed a pilot trial to compare rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism despite ongoing anticoagulation with rivaroxaban.. The study was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients with objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism to receive rivaroxaban (20 mg once a day) plus aspirin (300 mg once a day) or an adjusted dose of acenocoumarol. The study was designed to evaluate the incidence of recurrent thromboembolic events (recurrent ipsilateral or contralateral DVT, PE, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction) and hemorrhagic events.. A total of 58 patients were randomized: 28 were allocated to the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group and 30 to the acenocoumarol group. After 90 days of follow-up, three recurrent thromboembolic events (primary outcome) occurred in the acenocoumarol group - two DVTs and one ischemic stroke - and zero events in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.15; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.008-2.83; P = 0.20). Minor bleeding occurred in five patients in the acenocoumarol group and zero in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (RR 0.09; 95 % CI 0.005-1.68; p = 0.10). There was one non-fatal gastrointestinal major bleed in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group.. In this pilot study, there were no significant differences in any outcome assessed; however, recurrent thromboembolic events and minor bleeding events occurred numerically less frequently in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group. These data suggest the need to carry out more extensive randomized studies with sufficient statistical power to clarify these results.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Pilot Projects; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Low dose rivaroxaban with aspirin reduced major cardiovascular events (MACE) compared to aspirin alone in patients with cardiovascular disease although effects on total events are unknown.. The COMPASS clinical trial randomized 27,395 participants with chronic coronary and/or peripheral artery disease to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily alone, or aspirin 100 mg daily. We analyzed total (first and recurrent) MACE outcomes of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction, and the primary safety outcome of major bleeding. Exploratory analyses included on-treatment and net clinical benefit. Total MACE and safety events were modeled for each treatment.. MACE events were lowest in rivaroxaban with aspirin (379 first MACE, 432 total MACE) compared with rivaroxaban (448 first, 508 total) or aspirin alone (496 first, 574 total). Rivaroxaban and aspirin reduced total MACE events compared with aspirin alone [HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.85, P < .0001, number needed to treat for 2 years (NNT. Low dose rivaroxaban with aspirin significantly reduces first and total cardiovascular events compared with aspirin alone with a NNT. NCT01776424. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01776424.

Topics: Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban

Parenteral enoxaparin is a preferred anticoagulant used in the acute phase for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The safety and efficacy of short-term low-dose rivaroxaban in this clinical setting remain unknown.. To compare the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin in the acute phase of ACS.. This multicenter, prospective, open-label, active-controlled, equivalence and noninferiority trial was conducted from January 2017 through May 2021 with a 6-month follow-up at 21 hospitals in China. Participants included patients with ACS missing the primary reperfusion window or before selective revascularization. Data were analyzed from November 2021 to November 2022.. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to oral rivaroxaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg or 1 mg/kg subcutaneous enoxaparin twice daily in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg once daily) for a mean of 3.7 days.. The primary safety end point was bleeding events, as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, and the primary efficacy end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, rerevascularization, or stroke during the 6-month follow-up.. Of 2055 enrolled patients, 2046 (99.6%) completed the trial (mean [SD] age 65.8 [8.2] years, 1443 [70.5%] male) and were randomized to enoxaparin (680 patients), rivaroxaban 2.5 mg (683 patients), or rivaroxaban 5 mg (683 patients). Bleeding rates were 46 patients (6.8%) in the enoxaparin group, 32 patients (4.7%) in the rivaroxaban 2.5 mg group, and 36 patients (5.3%)in the rivaroxaban 5 mg group (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg vs enoxaparin: noninferiority hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.07; P = .005; rivaroxaban 5 mg vs enoxaparin: noninferiority HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.09; P = .001). The incidence of MACEs was similar among groups, and noninferiority was reached in the rivaroxaban 5 mg group (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.16, P = .02) but not in the rivaroxaban 2.5 mg group (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.30; P = .05) compared with the enoxaparin group.. In this equivalence and noninferiority trial, oral rivaroxaban 5 mg showed noninferiority to subcutaneous enoxaparin (1 mg/kg) for patients with ACS treated with DAPT during the acute phase. Results of this feasibility study provide useful information for designing future randomized clinical trials with sufficient sample sizes.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03363035.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Andexanet alfa is a modified recombinant inactive factor Xa (FXa) designed to reverse FXa inhibitors. ANNEXA-4 (Andexanet Alfa, a Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of Factor Xa Inhibitors) was a multicenter, prospective, phase-3b/4, single-group cohort study that evaluated andexanet alfa in patients with acute major bleeding. The results of the final analyses are presented.. Patients with acute major bleeding within 18 hours of FXa inhibitor administration were enrolled. Co-primary end points were anti-FXa activity change from baseline during andexanet alfa treatment and excellent or good hemostatic efficacy, defined by a scale used in previous reversal studies, at 12 hours. The efficacy population included patients with baseline anti-FXa activity levels above predefined thresholds (≥75 ng/mL for apixaban and rivaroxaban, ≥40 ng/mL for edoxaban, and ≥0.25 IU/mL for enoxaparin; reported in the same units used for calibrators) who were adjudicated as meeting major bleeding criteria (modified International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition). The safety population included all patients. Major bleeding criteria, hemostatic efficacy, thrombotic events (stratified by occurring before or after restart of either prophylactic [ie, a lower dose, for prevention rather than treatment] or full-dose oral anticoagulation), and deaths were assessed by an independent adjudication committee. Median endogenous thrombin potential at baseline and across the follow-up period was a secondary outcome.. There were 479 patients enrolled (mean age, 78 years; 54% male; 86% White); 81% were anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation, and the median time was 11.4 hours since last dose, with 245 (51%) on apixaban, 176 (37%) on rivaroxaban, 36 (8%) on edoxaban, and 22 (5%) on enoxaparin. Bleeding was predominantly intracranial (n=331 [69%]) or gastrointestinal (n=109 [23%]). In evaluable apixaban patients (n=172), median anti-FXa activity decreased from 146.9 ng/mL to 10.0 ng/mL (reduction, 93% [95% CI, 94-93]); in rivaroxaban patients (n=132), it decreased from 214.6 ng/mL to 10.8 ng/mL (94% [95% CI, 95-93]); in edoxaban patients (n=28), it decreased from 121.1 ng/mL to 24.4 ng/mL (71% [95% CI, 82-65); and in enoxaparin patients (n=17), it decreased from 0.48 IU/mL to 0.11 IU/mL (75% [95% CI, 79-67]). Excellent or good hemostasis occurred in 274 of 342 evaluable patients (80% [95% CI, 75-84]). In the safety population, thrombotic events occurred in 50 (10%) patients; in 16 patients, these occurred during treatment with prophylactic anticoagulation that began after the bleeding event. No thrombotic episodes occurred after oral anticoagulation restart. Specific to certain populations, reduction of anti-FXa activity from baseline to nadir significantly predicted hemostatic efficacy in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.54-0.70]) and correlated with lower mortality in patients <75 years of age (adjusted. In patients with major bleeding associated with the use of FXa inhibitors, treatment with andexanet alfa reduced anti-FXa activity and was associated with good or excellent hemostatic efficacy in 80% of patients.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT02329327.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thrombin; Thrombosis

Evidence on the treatment for left ventricular (LV) thrombus is limited and mainly derives from retrospective studies. The aim of R-DISSOLVE was to explore the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with LV thrombus. R-DISSOLVE was a prospective, interventional, single-arm study, conducted from Oct 2020 to June 2022 at Fuwai Hospital, China. Patients with a history of LV thrombus < 3 months and with systemic anticoagulation therapy < 1 month were included. The thrombus was quantitatively confirmed by contrast-enhanced echocardiography (CE) at baseline and follow-up visits. Eligible patients were assigned to rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily or 15 mg if creatinine clearance was between 30 and 49 mL/min) and its concentration was determined by detecting anti-Xa activity. The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of LV thrombus resolution at 12 weeks. The main safety outcome was the composite of ISTH major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. A total of 64 patients with complete CE results were analyzed for efficacy outcomes. The mean LV ejection fraction was 25.4 ± 9.0%. The dose-response curve of rivaroxaban was satisfactory based on the peak and trough plasma levels and all concentrations were in the recommended treatment range according to NOAC guidelines. The incidence rate of thrombus resolution at 6 weeks was 66.1% (41/62, 95% CI 53.0-77.7%), and of thrombus resolution or reduction was 95.2% (59/62, 95% CI 86.5-99.0%). At 12 weeks, the thrombus resolution rate was 78.1% (50/64, 95% CI 66.0-87.5%) while the rate of thrombus resolution or reduction was 95.3% (61/64, 95% CI 86.9-99.0%). The main safety outcome occurred in 4 of 75 patients (5.3%) (2 ISTH major bleeding and 2 clinically relevant non-major bleeding). In patients with LV thrombus, we reported a high thrombus resolution rate with acceptable safety by rivaroxaban, which could be a potential option for further LV thrombus treatment.Trial registration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04970381.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y. The study is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial. A total of 1020 patients with CHD and GID undergoing PCI will be enrolled. Patients are randomized (1:1) to receive either rivaroxaban 10 mg plus clopidogrel 75 mg daily or aspirin 100 mg plus clopidogrel 75 mg daily; both treatments will last 6 months. The primary endpoint is Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2-5 bleeding requiring medical intervention. The secondary endpoint is a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including all-cause death, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, and stroke.. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban plus clopidogrel versus aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients with CHD and GID undergoing PCI. We aim to explore an optimized antithrombotic strategy, which achieves the same anti-ischemic effect as standard DAPT without increasing the risk of GIB, for patients with CHD and GID undergoing PCI.. This protocol is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry under the number ChiCTR2100044319. And this publication is based on version 1.4 of the trial protocol dated Sep 6, 2021.

Topics: Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

The benefit of rivaroxaban in thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery remains unknown. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, patients who underwent thoracic surgery for lung cancer were enrolled, and randomly assigned to rivaroxaban or nadroparin groups in a 1:1 ratio; anticoagulants were initiated 12-24 h after surgery and continued until discharge. Four hundred participants were required according to a noninferiority margin of 2%, assuming venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence rates of 6.0% and 12.6% for patients in the rivaroxaban and nadroparin groups, respectively. The primary efficacy outcome was any VTE during the treatment and 30-day follow-up periods. The safety outcome was any on-treatment bleeding event. Finally, 403 patients were randomized (intention-to-treat [ITT] population), with 381 included in per-protocol (PP) population. The primary efficacy outcomes occurred in 12.5% (25/200) of the rivaroxaban group and 17.7% (36/203) of the nadroparin group (absolute risk reduction, -5.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], [-12.2-1.7]), indicating the noninferiority of rivaroxaban in ITT population. Sensitivity analysis was performed in the PP population and yielded similar results, confirming the noninferiority of rivaroxaban. In the safety analysis population, the incidence of any on-treatment bleeding events did not differ significantly between the groups (12.2% for rivaroxaban vs. 7.0% for nadroparin; relative risk [RR], 1.9; 95% CI, [0.9-3.7]; p = .08), including major bleeding (9.7% vs. 6.5%; RR, 1.6 [95% CI, 0.9-3.7]; p = .24), and nonmajor bleeding (2.6% vs. 0.5%; RR, 5.2 [95% CI, 0.6-45.2]; p = .13). Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery was shown to be noninferior to nadroparin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Nadroparin; Rivaroxaban; Thoracic Surgery; Venous Thromboembolism

COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is associated with heightened risks of venous and arterial thrombosis and hospitalization due to respiratory failure. To assess whether prophylactic anticoagulation can safely reduce the frequency of venous and arterial thrombosis, hospitalization, and death in nonhospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19 and at least one thrombosis risk factor, we conducted the PREVENT-HD double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial (A Study of Rivaroxaban to Reduce the Risk of Major Venous and Arterial Thrombotic Events, Hospitalization and Death in Medically Ill Outpatients With Acute, Symptomatic COVID-19] Infection).. PREVENT-HD was conducted between August 2020 and April 2022 at 14 US integrated health care delivery networks. A virtual trial design used remote informed consent and clinical monitoring and facilitated data collection through electronic health record integration with a cloud-based research platform. Nonhospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19 and at least one thrombosis risk factor were enrolled and randomly assigned to either 10 mg of oral rivaroxaban or placebo daily for 35 days. The primary efficacy outcome was time to first occurrence of a composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, non-central nervous system systemic arterial embolism, hospitalization, or death through day 35. The principal safety end point was International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis critical-site or fatal bleeding. The last study visit was on day 49.. The study was terminated prematurely because of enrollment challenges and a lower-than-expected blinded pooled event rate. A total of 1284 patients underwent randomization with complete accrual of primary events through May 2022. No patients were lost to follow-up. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 22 of 641 in the rivaroxaban group and 19 of 643 in the placebo group (3.4% versus 3.0%; hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.63-2.15];. The study was terminated prematurely after enrollment of 32% of planned accrual because of recruitment challenges and lower-than-expected event rate. Rivaroxaban prescribed for 35 days in nonhospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19 at risk for thrombosis did not appear to reduce a composite end point of venous and arterial thrombotic events, hospitalization, and death.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT04508023.

Topics: Anticoagulants; COVID-19; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Outpatients; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery. Clinical end point studies on thromboprophylaxis with direct oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing bariatric surgery are lacking.. To assess the efficacy and safety of a prophylactic dose of 10 mg/d of rivaroxaban for both 7 and 28 days after bariatric surgery.. This assessor-blinded, phase 2, multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2021, with participants from 3 academic and nonacademic hospitals in Switzerland.. Patients were randomized 1 day after bariatric surgery to 10 mg of oral rivaroxaban for either 7 days (short prophylaxis) or 28 days (long prophylaxis).. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep vein thrombosis (symptomatic or asymptomatic) and pulmonary embolism within 28 days after bariatric surgery. Main safety outcomes included major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and mortality.. Of 300 patients, 272 (mean [SD] age, 40.0 [12.1] years; 216 women [80.3%]; mean body mass index, 42.2) were randomized; 134 received a 7-day and 135 a 28-day VTE prophylaxis course with rivaroxaban. Only 1 thromboembolic event (0.4%) occurred (asymptomatic thrombosis in a patient undergoing sleeve gastrectomy with extended prophylaxis). Major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events were observed in 5 patients (1.9%): 2 in the short prophylaxis group and 3 in the long prophylaxis group. Clinically nonsignificant bleeding events were observed in 10 patients (3.7%): 3 in the short prophylaxis arm and 7 in the long prophylaxis arm.. In this randomized clinical trial, once-daily VTE prophylaxis with 10 mg of rivaroxaban was effective and safe in the early postoperative phase after bariatric surgery in both the short and long prophylaxis groups.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03522259.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Emerging data suggest that direct oral anticoagulants may be a suitable choice for anticoagulation for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). However, conducting high-quality trials in CVT is challenging as it is a rare disease with low rates of adverse outcomes such as major bleeding and functional dependence. To facilitate the design of future CVT trials, SECRET (Study of Rivaroxaban for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis) assessed (1) the feasibility of recruitment, (2) the safety of rivaroxaban compared with standard-of-care anticoagulation, and (3) patient-centered functional outcomes.. This was a phase II, prospective, open-label blinded-end point 1:1 randomized trial conducted at 12 Canadian centers. Participants were aged ≥18 years, within 14 days of a new diagnosis of symptomatic CVT, and suitable for oral anticoagulation; they were randomized to receive rivaroxaban 20 mg daily, or standard-of-care anticoagulation (warfarin, target international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0, or low-molecular-weight heparin) for 180 days, with optional extension up to 365 days. Primary outcomes were annual rate of recruitment (feasibility); and a composite of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, major extracranial hemorrhage, or mortality at 180 days (safety). Secondary outcomes included recurrent venous thromboembolism, recanalization, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and functional and patient-reported outcomes (modified Rankin Scale, quality of life, headache, mood, fatigue, and cognition) at days 180 and 365.. Fifty-five participants were randomized. The rate of recruitment was 21.3 participants/year; 57% of eligible candidates consented. Median age was 48.0 years (interquartile range, 38.5-73.2); 66% were female. There was 1 primary event (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage), 2 clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events, and 1 recurrent CVT by day 180, all in the rivaroxaban group. All participants in both arms had at least partial recanalization by day 180. At enrollment, both groups on average reported reduced quality of life, low mood, fatigue, and headache with impaired cognitive performance. All metrics improved markedly by day 180.. Recruitment targets were reached, but many eligible participants declined randomization. There were numerically more bleeding events in patients taking rivaroxaban compared with control, but rates of bleeding and recurrent venous thromboembolism were low overall and in keeping with previous studies. Participants had symptoms affecting their well-being at enrollment but improved over time.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: NCT03178864.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticoagulants; Canada; Feasibility Studies; Female; Headache; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin for treating cancer-associated VTE.. Is rivaroxaban as efficient and safe as dalteparin to treat patients with cancer-associated VTE?. In a randomized open-label noninferiority trial, patients with active cancer who had proximal DVT, pulmonary embolism (PE), or both were assigned randomly to therapeutic doses of rivaroxaban or dalteparin for 3 months. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE, a composite of symptomatic or incidental DVT or PE, and worsening of pulmonary vascular or venous obstruction at 3 months.. Of 158 randomized patients, 74 and 84 patients were assigned to receive rivaroxaban and dalteparin, respectively. Mean age was 69.4 years, and 115 patients (76.2%) had metastatic disease. The primary outcome occurred in 4 and 6 patients in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively (both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations: cumulative incidence, 6.4% vs 10.1%; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.21-2.66). Major bleeding occurred in 1 and 3 patients in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively (cumulative incidence, 1.4% vs 3.7%; SHR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.04-3.43). Major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 9 and 8 patients in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively (cumulative incidence, 12.2% vs 9.8%; SHR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.49-3.26). Overall, 19 patients (25.7%) and 20 patients (23.8%) died in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.56-1.97).. In this trial comparing rivaroxaban and dalteparin in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE, the number of patients was insufficient to reach the predefined criteria for noninferiority, but efficacy and safety results were consistent with those previously reported with DOACs. An updated meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing DOACs with low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer-associated VTE is provided.. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02746185; URL: www.. gov.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The success of antithrombotic therapies is assessed based on thrombotic and bleeding events. Simultaneously assessing both kinds of events might be challenging, and recurrent bleeding events are often ignored. We tried to confirm the effects of kidney function on outcome events in patients undergoing antithrombotic therapy.. As a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial, a randomized clinical trial with a median follow-up of 36 months, patients were divided into high and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) groups with a cutoff value of 50 mL/min. The cumulative incidence of bleeding and crude incidence of recurrent bleeding per 100 patient-years were calculated. We used the Cox regression model with multiple failure time data for recurrent bleeding events.. Among 2092 patients, 1386 (66.3%) showed high eGFR. The cumulative bleeding events per 100 patients at 1 year were 5.4 and 6.2 in the high and low eGFR groups, respectively. The difference continued to increase over time. The hazard ratio for time to the first bleeding event in the high eGFR group was 0.875 (95% confidence interval 0.701-1.090, p = .234) and that for the first composite event was 0.723 (95% confidence interval 0.603-0.867, p < .000). The recurrent bleeding events per 100 person-years were 11.3 and 15.3 in the high and low eGFR groups, respectively, with a rate ratio of 0.738 (95% confidence interval 0.615-0.886, p = .001). During the observation period, the risk of bleeding changed with time. It peaked soon after the study enrollment in both groups. It decreased continuously in the high eGFR group but remained high in the low eGFR group.. We reaffirmed that kidney function affects bleeding events in patients on antithrombotic therapy, considering recurrent events. Patients should have detailed discussions with physicians regarding the possible bleeding events when continuing antithrombotic therapy, especially in patients with decreased kidney function.. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000016612 . ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02642419 . Registered on 21 October 2015.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The efficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatment is not established for patients with acute symptomatic isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT). In real-world clinical practice, both therapeutic and prophylactic anticoagulation are used for acute IDDVT. However, therapeutic anticoagulation is associated with higher risk of bleeding than prophylactic anticoagulation. Thus, this study aims to assess the efficacy and safety in patients with first acute symptomatic IDDVT treated with therapeutic or prophylactic anticoagulation using rivaroxaban.. This study is a prospective, multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Outpatients with a first, acute, symptomatic, objectively confirmed IDDVT in four centres from 1 August 2021 are recruited. Eligible patients are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive prophylactic anticoagulation (rivaroxaban 10 mg once a day for 3 months) or therapeutic anticoagulation (rivaroxaban 20 mg once a day for 3 months). All patients are followed for 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome is radiographically confirmed recurrent venous thromboembolism. The primary safety outcome is the incidence of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events.. This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University (B2021-175R). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals.. NCT04967573.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of rivaroxaban on left ventricle thromboprophylaxis in patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).. Anterior STEMI is associated with an increased risk of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) formation. The contemporary role of prophylactic rivaroxaban therapy remains unclear.. We randomly assigned 279 patients with anterior STEMI who had undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention to receive, in a 1:1 ratio, low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily for 30 days) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or only DAPT. The primary efficacy outcome was the LVT formation within 30 days. Net clinical adverse events were assessed at 30 days and 180 days, including all-cause mortality, LVT, systemic embolism, rehospitalization for cardiovascular events, and bleeding.. The addition of low-dose rivaroxaban to DAPT reduced LVT formation within 30 days compared with only DAPT (0.7% vs 8.6%; HR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.01-0.62; P = 0.015; P < 0.001 for superiority). Net clinical adverse events were lower within 30 days in the rivaroxaban group versus those in the only DAPT group and remained relatively low throughout the follow-up period. There were no significant differences in bleeding events between the 2 groups in 30 days and 180 days. However, 1 case of intracranial hemorrhage (major bleeding) occurred in the rivaroxaban group within 30 days.. Our results supported that the short-duration addition of low-dose rivaroxaban to DAPT could prevent LVT formation in patients with anterior STEMI following primary percutaneous coronary intervention. A larger multiple-institution study is necessary to determine the generalizability.

Topics: Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Preliminary data highlights the importance of anticoagulation therapy in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism in SARS CoV-2 infection. There is insufficient data comparing the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and subcutaneous enoxaparin in the prophylactic management of COVID-19 associated thromboembolic disease, particularly in mild to moderate cases of COVID-19 infection.. The study was designed to investigate the efficacy of oral rivaroxaban as a prophylactic anticoagulant in mild to moderate SARS CoV-2 infection.. In this randomized, open-label, prospective superiority trial involving hospitalized patients with confirmed mild or moderate COVID-19 disease without known thromboembolism, we assigned 230 patients to receive either once-daily oral rivaroxaban (10mg or 15mg) or once-daily subcutaneous enoxaparin (40mg or 60mg) for a median duration of 8 days. The primary outcome was a composite of all major, clinically relevant haemorrhagic and thrombotic events.. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 4 of 115 patients in the rivaroxaban group (3.5%) versus 16 of 113 patients in the enoxaparin group (14.2%) (hazard ratio 0.207, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.069 to 0.621, P=0.005). Adverse events developed in 4.3% of patients in the study group and 12.4% in the enoxaparin group (hazard ratio 0.328; 95% CI, 0.118 to 0.910; P=0.032). Major bleeding was seen in 1 patient (0.9%) in the rivaroxaban group and 3 patients (2.7%) in the enoxaparin group.. Rivaroxaban alone was superior to enoxaparin for the prophylactic management of coagulopathy associated with mild to moderate SARS CoV-2 infection.

Topics: Anticoagulants; COVID-19; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism

Heparins and vitamin K antagonists are the mainstay of treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). Rivaroxaban is a potential alternative, but data to support its use are limited. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for the treatment of acute SVT. In an international, single-arm clinical trial, adult patients with a first episode of noncirrhotic, symptomatic, objectively diagnosed SVT received rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg daily for an intended duration of 3 months. Patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome and those receiving full-dose anticoagulation for >7 days prior to enrollment were excluded. Primary outcome was major bleeding; secondary outcomes included death, recurrent SVT, and complete vein recanalization within 3 months. Patients were followed for a total of 6 months. A total of 103 patients were enrolled; 100 were eligible for the analysis. Mean age was 54.4 years; 64% were men. SVT risk factors included abdominal inflammation/infection (28%), solid cancer (9%), myeloproliferative neoplasms (9%), and hormonal therapy (9%); 43% of cases were unprovoked. JAK2 V617F mutation was detected in 26% of 50 tested patients. At 3 months, 2 patients (2.1%; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-7.2) had major bleeding events (both gastrointestinal). One (1.0%) patient died due to a non-SVT-related cause, 2 had recurrent SVT (2.1%). Complete recanalization was documented in 47.3% of patients. One additional major bleeding event and 1 recurrent SVT occurred at 6 months. Rivaroxaban appears as a potential alternative to standard anticoagulation for the treatment of SVT in non-cirrhotic patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02627053 and at eudract.ema.europa.eu as #2014-005162-29-36.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Splanchnic Circulation; Venous Thrombosis

The clinical benefit of extended prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after laparoscopic surgery for cancer is unclear. The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants for this indication are unexplored. PROphylaxis of venous thromboembolism after LAParoscopic Surgery for colorectal cancer Study II (PROLAPS II) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, investigator-initiated, superiority study aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of extended prophylaxis with rivaroxaban after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Consecutive patients who had laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer were randomized to receive rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) or a placebo to be started at 7 ± 2 days after surgery and given for the subsequent 3 weeks. All patients received antithrombotic prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin from surgery to randomization. The primary study outcome was the composite of symptomatic objectively confirmed VTE, asymptomatic ultrasonography-detected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or VTE-related death at 28 ± 2 days after surgery. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Patient recruitment was prematurely closed due to study drug expiry after the inclusion of 582 of the 646 planned patients. A primary study outcome event occurred in 11 of 282 patients in the placebo group compared with 3 of 287 in the rivaroxaban group (3.9 vs 1.0%; odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.94; log-rank P = .032). Major bleeding occurred in none of the patients in the placebo group and 2 patients in the rivaroxaban group (incidence rate 0.7%; 95% CI, 0-1.0). Oral rivaroxaban was more effective than placebo for extended prevention of VTE after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer without an increase in major bleeding. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03055026.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Colorectal Neoplasms; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Laparoscopy; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

To determine the characteristics of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral artery disease (PAD), or both, initiating dual pathway inhibition (DPI) using rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin, and to report their clinical outcomes and bleeding rates in clinical practice compared to the COMPASS randomized trial, which provided the basis for using DPI in this patient population.. XATOA is a prospective registry of 5532 patients: of which, 72.7% had CAD, 58.9% had PAD, and 31.6% had both. The mean age of patients was 68 years and 25.5% were women. The mean follow-up period was 15 months. The most frequently reported reason for initiating DPI was the presence of existing, worsening or newly diagnosed risk characteristics (n = 4753, 85.9%). Before initiating DPI, 75.3% received a single antiplatelet and 18.3% received various antiplatelet combinations. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE) and acute or severe limb ischaemia was 2.26, 3.57, and 1.54 per 100 patient-years, respectively, among the 5532 patients in XATOA. Corresponding rates in COMPASS were 2.18, 0.19, and 0.12 per 100 patient-years, respectively. Major bleeding rates were 0.95 and 1.67 per 100 patient-years in XATOA and COMPASS, respectively.. High-risk vascular patients are prioritized for DPI in clinical practice, and rates of MACE are similar to COMPASS, but MALE rates are higher in XATOA, consistent with the greater proportion of PAD patients. Major bleeding rates were lower in XATOA. The findings provide support for favourable net clinical benefit of DPI in high-risk vascular patients.. The characteristics of patients initiated on dual pathway inhibition (DPI: rivaroxaban 2.5  mg twice daily plus aspirin) have not previously been defined in clinical practice and the XATOA registry findings demonstrate patient outcomes are consistent with those of the COMPASS trial, despite geographic differences in recruitment and the higher proportion of PAD patients.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Registries; Rivaroxaban

 Rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy (rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet therapy) in efficacy but superior in safety in the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial. Among 2,215 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD), 1,378 had baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥50 mL/min and received 10 (underdose) or 15 mg/d (standard-dose) rivaroxaban. We aimed to assess the effects of rivaroxaban underdose on clinical outcomes..  We assessed efficacy endpoint (a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, and death from any cause) and major bleeding in the subgroup of patients with preserved renal function in the AFIRE trial..  Age ≥75 years, female sex, lower CrCl, heart failure, and percutaneous coronary intervention history were associated with the underdose prescription. The underdose group had a similar incidence of the efficacy endpoint (3.62 vs. 3.51% per patient-year;.  In patients with AF, stable CAD, and preserved renal function, rivaroxaban underdose was associated with similar rates of thrombotic events but a lower incidence of hemorrhagic events than the standard dose..  AFIRE UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/), number UMIN000016612, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02642419.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Arteries; Aspirin; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lower Extremity; Male; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

Appropriate regimens of antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) have not yet been established.. To compare the total number of thrombotic and/or bleeding events between rivaroxaban monotherapy and combined rivaroxaban and antiplatelet therapy in such patients.. This was a post hoc secondary analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) open-label, randomized clinical trial. This multicenter analysis was conducted from February 23, 2015, to July 31, 2018. Patients with AF and stable CAD who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting 1 or more years earlier or who had angiographically confirmed CAD not requiring revascularization were enrolled. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2020, to March 26, 2021.. Rivaroxaban monotherapy or combined rivaroxaban and antiplatelet therapy.. The total incidence of thrombotic, bleeding, and fatal events was compared between the groups. Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the risk of subsequent events in the 2 groups, with the status of thrombotic or bleeding events that had occurred by the time of death used as a time-dependent variable.. A total of 2215 patients (mean [SD] age, 74 [8.2] years; 1751 men [79.1%]) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The total event rates for the rivaroxaban monotherapy group (1107 [50.0%]) and the combination-therapy group (1108 [50.0%]) were 12.2% (135 of 1107) and 19.2% (213 of 1108), respectively, during a median follow-up of 24.1 (IQR, 17.3-31.5) months. The mortality rate was 3.7% (41 of 1107) in the monotherapy group and 6.6% (73 of 1108) in the combination-therapy group. Rivaroxaban monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of total events compared with combination therapy (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.80; P < .001). Monotherapy was an independent factor associated with a lower risk of subsequent events compared with combination therapy. The mortality risk after a bleeding event (monotherapy, 75% [6 of 8]; combination therapy, 62.1% [18 of 29]) was higher than that after a thrombotic event (monotherapy, 25% [2 of 8]; combination therapy, 37.9% [11 of 29]).. Rivaroxaban monotherapy was associated with lower risks of total thrombotic and/or bleeding events than combination therapy in patients with AF and stable CAD. Tapered antithrombotic therapy with a sole anticoagulant should be considered in these patients.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02642419.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

It is unknown whether Asian and non-Asian patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease derive similar benefits from long-term antithrombotic therapy.. In patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD) enrolled in The Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies trial, the effects of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. plus aspirin 100 mg o.d. were compared with those of aspirin 100 mg o.d. in Asian vs. non-Asian patients (race was self-identified). Asians (n = 4269) vs. non-Asians (n = 23 126) had similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (4.85% vs. 4.83%, P = 0.30) and modified International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding (2.72% vs. 2.58%, P = 0.22), but higher rates of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) (0.63% vs. 0.29%, P = 0.01) and minor bleeding (13.61% vs. 6.49%, P < 0.001). In Asians vs. non-Asians, the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone produced consistent reductions in MACE [Asians: hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-0.90; non-Asians: HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.90; P(heterogeneity) = 0.29], increases in modified ISTH major bleeding (Asians: HR 2.24, 95% CI: 1.40-3.58; non-Asians: HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.30-1.97; P = 0.20), and net clinical outcome (Asians: HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.56-1.05; non-Asians: HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.93, P = 0.78), but borderline higher rates of ICH (Asians: HR: 3.50, 95% CI: 0.98-12.56; non-Asians: HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.43, 1.53; P = 0.04).. Asian compared with non-Asian patients with chronic CAD and/or PAD have higher rates of ICH and minor bleeding. The combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin vs. aspirin alone produces similar effects for MACE, modified ISTH major bleeding, and net clinical outcome but may be associated with higher rates of ICH in Asian patients.

Topics: Asian People; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Rivaroxaban

Warfarin and rivaroxaban were the two most commonly-used anticoagulant drugs for Deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The aim of this study was to explore the effects of post-discharge pharmacist-led follow-up on drug treatment in patients with DVT in primary hospitals from a pharmacological perspective. A total of 125 patients were recruited from July 2017 to June 2019 and randomized to either a control group or an intervention group. The control group was given routine medication guidance, clinical pharmacists followed up at 3 and 6 months after discharge. The intervention group was based on the control group and was followed up weekly for 6 months after discharge. For patients taking warfarin, the percentage of time in therapeutic range (TTR) and TTR>65% were significantly higher in the intervention group (p<0.05) and they also had less frequent dose changes. For patients taking warfarin or rivaroxaban, vascular ultrasonography showed better improvement rate in the intervention group (p<0.05). Pharmacist-led follow-up showed that the medication adherence (p<0.05) were significantly improved. There were lower risks of total and minor hemorrhage events and thrombosis events in the intervention group (p<0.05). Pharmacist-led follow-up not only reduced the risk of hemorrhage and thrombosis events, but also improved adherence to anticoagulation drugs.

Topics: Aftercare; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Hospitals; Humans; Patient Discharge; Pharmacists; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

The optimal anti-thrombotic therapy to prevent recurrent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome and coronary artery ectasia (CAE) remains unclear.. To assess the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet plus anticoagulant therapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery ectasia.. OVER-TIME is an investigator initiated, exploratory, open label, single center, randomized clinical trial comparing dual antiplatelet therapy (acetyl-salicylic acid plus a P2Y12 inhibitor) with the combination of an antiplatelet monotherapy (a P2Y12 inhibitor) plus a low dose anticoagulant (rivaroxaban, 15mg oral dose) for the prevention of recurrent ischemic events among patients with CAE. We aim to enroll approximately 60 patients with CAE and acute coronary syndromes. After recruitment, patients are randomized to (a) standard of care (dual antiplatelet regimen) or (b) the combination of antiplatelet monotherapy and low dose anticoagulant. Patients will be followed for at least 12 months. The OVER-TIME study aims to assess the efficacy of the regimen in prevention of major cardiovascular events and its security in bleeding events in acute coronary syndromes among patients with CAE. Expected results and conclusions: OVER-TIME is the first randomized controlled trial to assess different antithrombotic strategies in patients with CAE and acute coronary syndrome, and its results will offer preliminary data for the prevention of major cardiovascular events and bleeding events in this group of patients.. NCT05233124 (ClinicalTrials.gov), date of registration: February 10, 2022.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Coronary Vessels; Dilatation, Pathologic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Salicylic Acid; Treatment Outcome

Anticoagulant treatment of pediatric cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been prospectively evaluated. Management of anticoagulation for cancer-associated VTE is often challenged by drug interactions and treatment interruptions. A total of 56 of the 500 children (11.2%) with VTE who participated in the recent EINSTEIN-Jr randomized study had cancer (hematologic malignancy, 64.3%, solid malignant tumor, 35.7%). Children were allocated to either therapeutic-dose bodyweight-adjusted oral rivaroxaban (n=40) or standard anticoagulation with heparins, with or without vitamin K antagonists (n=16) and received a median of 30 concomitant medications. Based on sparse blood sampling at steady-state, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of rivaroxaban were derived using population PK modeling. During the 3 months of treatment, no recurrent VTE or major bleeding occurred (95% confidence interval, 0.0%-6.4%), and 3-month repeat imaging showed complete or partial vein recanalization in 20 and 24 of 52 evaluable children (38.5% and 46.2%, respectively). Anticoagulant treatment was interrupted 70 times in 26 (46.4%) children because of thrombocytopenia, invasive procedures, or adverse events, for a mean individual period of 5.8 days. Anticoagulant therapy was resumed in therapeutic doses and was not associated with thrombotic or bleeding complications. Rivaroxaban exposures were within the adult exposure range and similar to those observed in children with VTE who did not have cancer-associated VTE. Rivaroxaban and standard anticoagulants appeared safe and efficacious and were associated with reduced clot burden in most children with cancer-associated VTE, including those who had anticoagulant treatment interruptions. Rivaroxaban exposures were within the adult exposure range despite significant polypharmacy use. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02234843.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Child; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Testing of factor Xa inhibitors for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated atrial fibrillation has been limited.. We enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation and echocardiographically documented rheumatic heart disease who had any of the following: a CHA. Of 4565 enrolled patients, 4531 were included in the final analysis. The mean age of the patients was 50.5 years, and 72.3% were women. Permanent discontinuation of trial medication was more common with rivaroxaban than with vitamin K antagonist therapy at all visits. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 560 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 446 in the vitamin K antagonist group had a primary-outcome event. Survival curves were nonproportional. The restricted mean survival time was 1599 days in the rivaroxaban group and 1675 days in the vitamin K antagonist group (difference, -76 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -121 to -31; P<0.001). A higher incidence of death occurred in the rivaroxaban group than in the vitamin K antagonist group (restricted mean survival time, 1608 days vs. 1680 days; difference, -72 days; 95% CI, -117 to -28). No significant between-group difference in the rate of major bleeding was noted.. Among patients with rheumatic heart disease-associated atrial fibrillation, vitamin K antagonist therapy led to a lower rate of a composite of cardiovascular events or death than rivaroxaban therapy, without a higher rate of bleeding. (Funded by Bayer; INVICTUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02832544.).

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Echocardiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Rheumatic Heart Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Real-world evidence on factor Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban) prescribing patterns, safety, and efficacy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is rare. Herein, we sought to examine the above outcomes in the largest academic center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).. This is a retrospective observational study designed to examine the prescribing pattern, safety and real-world effectiveness of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban in patients with NVAF and VTE. Data on rivaroxaban prescriptions were collected and analyzed. Bleeding outcomes were defined as per the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) definition.. A total of 2,316 patients taking rivaroxaban recruited through several departments of King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC). The mean age was 61 years (±17.8) with 55% above the age of 60 and 58% were females. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (VTE) was the most prevalent reason for prescribing rivaroxaban, followed by NVAF. A total daily dosage of 15 mg was given to 23% of the patients. The incidence rate of recurrent thrombosis and recurrent stroke was 0.2%. Furthermore, rivaroxaban had a 0.04 percent incidence rate of myocardial infarction. Half of the patients with recurrent thrombosis and stroke were taking 15 mg per day. The incidence rate of major bleeding was 1.1%. More over half of the patients who experienced significant bleeding were taking rivaroxaban at a dosage of 20 mg per day. According to the HAS-BLED Score (>2 score), 48 percent of patients who experienced significant bleeding had a high risk of bleeding. Non-major bleeding occurred in 0.6% of cases. Similarly, 40% of patients with non-major bleeding were taking rivaroxaban at a dosage of 20 mg per day. According to the HAS-BLED Score, just 6.6% of these individuals had a high risk of bleeding. 93.4% of the patients, on the other hand, were at intermediate risk.. The prescription of rivaroxaban in this real-life cohort study differs from the prescribing label and the outcomes of a phase 3 randomised clinical trial. However, for individuals with VTE and NVAF, the 20 mg dose looked to be more efficacious than the pivotal trial outcomes. Furthermore, among patients with VTE and NVAF, rivaroxaban was linked to a decreased incidence of safety events such as recurrent thrombosis, recurrent stroke, MI, major bleeding, and non-major haemorrhage in a real-world environment.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombin III; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Saudi Arabia; Stroke; Thrombophlebitis; Venous Thromboembolism

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) often occurs after hospitalization in medically ill patients, but the population benefit-risk of extended thromboprophylaxis remains uncertain. Methods and Results The MARINER (Medically Ill Patient Assessment of Rivaroxaban Versus Placebo in Reducing Post-Discharge Venous Thrombo-Embolism Risk) study (NCT02111564) was a randomized double-blind trial that compared thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban 10 mg daily versus placebo for 45 days after hospital discharge in medically ill patients with a creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min. The benefit-risk balance in this population was quantified by calculating the between-treatment rate differences in efficacy and safety end points per 10 000 patients treated. Clinical characteristics of the study population were consistent with a hospitalized medical population at risk for VTE. Treating 10 000 patients with rivaroxaban resulted in 32.5 fewer symptomatic VTE and VTE-related deaths but was associated with 8 additional major bleeding events. The treatment benefit was driven by the prevention of nonfatal symptomatic VTE (26 fewer events). There was no between-treatment difference in the composite of critical site or fatal bleeding. Conclusions Extending thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban for 45 days after hospitalization provides a positive benefit-risk balance in medically ill patients at risk for VTE who are not at high risk for bleeding. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT02111564.

Topics: Aftercare; Anticoagulants; Creatinine; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Patient Discharge; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The Clopidogrel and Acetylsalicylic Acid in Bypass Surgery for Peripheral Arterial Disease (CASPAR) trial is the only large, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus aspirin in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) after lower extremity revascularization (LER). The trial was neutral for index-graft occlusion/revascularization, amputation or death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.23, p = .87) with an excess of global utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries moderate or severe bleeding (HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.32-6.08, p = .007).. VOYAGER-PAD demonstrated that rivaroxaban significantly reduces acute limb ischemia (ALI), major amputation, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and CV death but increased bleeding. The relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in a CASPAR like population and for similar outcomes is unknown. The current analysis is a post-hoc exploratory analysis of a "CASPAR like" composite of ALI, unplanned index limb revascularization (UILR), amputation or CV death in surgical patients.. In the 2185 who underwent surgical LER, rivaroxaban reduced the CASPAR endpoint at 1 (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.95, p = .0133) and 3 years (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-1.00, p = .0461, Figure). There were similar reductions in composites of ALI, amputation or CV death (HR 0.79, p = .0228) and ALI, UILR, amputation, MI, IS or CV death (HR 0.85, p = .0410).. The combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin significantly reduces ischemic outcomes in patients with PAD after LER. Although no formal head-to-head comparison exists, in a similar population and for similar outcomes, this regimen demonstrated benefit where trials of DAPT were neutral. These data suggest that factor Xa inhibition may provide specific benefits in this population and that DAPT should not be considered a proven substitution.

Topics: Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Lower Extremity; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Treatment Outcome

Although apixaban and rivaroxaban are commonly used in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular heart disease (VHD), there is limited evidence comparing the 2 drugs in these patients.. To emulate a target trial of effectiveness and safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients with AF and VHD.. New-user, active comparator, cohort study design.. Commercial health insurance database from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020.. New users of apixaban or rivaroxaban who had a diagnosis of AF and VHD before initiation of anticoagulant therapy.. The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding. Cox proportional hazards regression with a robust variance estimator was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs.. When compared with rivaroxaban in a propensity score-matched cohort of 19 894 patients (9947 receiving each drug), apixaban was associated with a lower rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.80]) and bleeding (HR, 0.51 [CI, 0.41 to 0.62]). The absolute reduction in the probability of stroke or systemic embolism with apixaban compared with rivaroxaban was 0.0026 within 6 months and 0.011 within 1 year of treatment initiation. The absolute reduction in the probability of bleeding events with apixaban compared with rivaroxaban was 0.012 within 6 months and 0.019 within 1 year of treatment initiation.. Short follow-up time and inability to ascertain some types of VHD.. In this study of patients with AF and VHD, patients receiving apixaban had a lower risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and for bleeding when compared with those receiving rivaroxaban.. National Institutes of Health.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Embolism; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are frequently prescribed for the management of atrial fibrillation and venous thrombosis. There is a lack of published data on the utilization of DOACs in individuals who have undergone recent cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to warfarin in patients postcardiac surgery.. In this retrospective cohort study, patients were separated into a DOAC cohort or a warfarin cohort based on the agent they received after cardiac surgery. Patients could be included if they were ≥18 years of age and received or were discharged on either rivaroxaban, apixaban, or warfarin within 7 days after cardiac surgery. The primary outcome for the study was the rate of International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding during hospitalization and for 30 days following discharge or until first follow-up appointment.. There were a total of 194 patients included in the analysis, 97 in the DOAC cohort and 97 in the warfarin cohort. Four patients (4.1%) in the DOAC group experienced ISTH major bleeding, while 2 patients (2.1%) in the warfarin cohort experienced ISTH major bleeding (p = 0.68). No patients in the DOAC cohort experienced a thrombotic event, whereas 2 patients (2.1%) in the warfarin cohort experienced a thrombotic complication (p = 0.5).. Apixaban and rivaroxaban demonstrated similar safety when compared to a matched cohort of warfarin patients. Larger prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

To compare two different treatment durations of rivaroxaban in patients with symptomatic isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT).. Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial.. 28 outpatient clinics specialising in venous thromboembolism.. 402 adults (≥18 years) with symptomatic isolated distal DVT.. After receiving standard dose rivaroxaban for six weeks, participants were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban 20 mg or placebo once daily for an additional six weeks. Follow-up was for 24 months from study inclusion.. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent venous thromboembolism during follow-up after randomisation, defined as the composite of progression of isolated distal DVT, recurrent isolated distal DVT, proximal DVT, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, or fatal pulmonary embolism. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding after randomisation until two days from the last dose of rivaroxaban or placebo. An independent committee adjudicated the outcomes.. 200 adults were randomised to receive additional rivaroxaban treatment and 202 to receive placebo. Isolated distal DVT was unprovoked in 81 (40%) and 86 (43%) patients, respectively. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 23 (11%) patients in the rivaroxaban arm and 39 (19%) in the placebo arm (relative risk 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.95; P=0.03, number needed to treat 13, 95% confidence interval 7 to 126). Recurrent isolated distal DVT occurred in 16 (8%) patients in the rivaroxaban arm and 31 (15%) in the placebo arm (P=0.02). Proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism occurred in seven (3%) patients in the rivaroxaban arm and eight (4%) in the placebo arm (P=0.80). No major bleeding events occurred.. Rivaroxaban administered for six additional weeks in patients with isolated distal DVT who had an uneventful six week treatment course reduces the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism, mainly recurrent isolated distal DVT, over a two year follow-up without increasing the risk of haemorrhage.. EudraCT 2016-000958-36; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02722447.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a serious and life-threatening condition. Anticoagulation during the acute phase of ACS is effective in reducing ischemic events. The most widely used parenteral anticoagulation agent in ACS patients is enoxaparin. Rivaroxaban is a novel oral anticoagulant with potent anti-Xa activity, which might be an attractive alternative drug to enoxaparin. In fact, rivaroxaban was consistently shown to be non-inferior to enoxaparin therapy in terms of reduction of recurrent venous thromboembolism events.. This prospective, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter study is designed to compare the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin in patients with ACS, who missed the primary reperfusion therapy window and before selective revascularization.. Up to 2055 participants receiving background treatment of aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor will be randomly assigned to either oral rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily or rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily or subcutaneous enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily until hospital discharge for a maximum of 8 days or 12 h before revascularization therapy. The primary safety endpoint is the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis definition of bleeding events [minor, clinically relevant non-major and major bleeding]. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, re-revascularization or stroke, and major bleeding events. Secondary endpoints include cardiac-related rehospitalization and all-cause death. Patients will be followed for 12 months after randomization.. The H-REPLACE trial offers an opportunity to assess clinical outcomes of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin during the acute phase of ACS and may provide an alternative anticoagulation strategy for ACS patients, who missed the primary reperfusion therapy window and before selective revascularization.. ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03363035.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

To analyse whether the benefits and risks of rivaroxaban plus aspirin vary in patients with comorbidities and receiving multiple drugs. In patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease, adding low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin reduces cardiovascular events and mortality. Polypharmacy and multimorbidity are frequent in such patients.. We describe ischaemic events (cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction) and major bleeding in participants from the randomized, double-blind COMPASS study by number of cardiovascular medications and concomitant medical conditions. We compared event rates and hazard ratios (HRs) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin vs. aspirin alone by the number of medications and concomitant conditions, and tested for interaction between polypharmacy or multimorbidity and the antithrombotic regimen. The risk of ischaemic events was higher in patients with more concomitant drugs (HR 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.5-2.1 for >4 vs. 0-2) and with more comorbidities (HR 2.3, 1.8-2.1 for >3 vs. 0-1). Multimorbidity, but not polypharmacy, was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding. The relative efficacy, safety, and net clinical benefit of rivaroxaban were not affected by the number of drugs or comorbidities. Patients taking more concomitant medications derived the largest absolute reduction in the net clinical outcome with added rivaroxaban (1.1% vs. 0.4% reduction with >4 vs. 0-2 cardiovascular drugs, number needed to treat 91 vs. 250).. Adding low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin resulted in benefits irrespective of the number of concomitant drugs or comorbidities. Multiple comorbidities and/or polypharmacy should not dissuade the addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin in otherwise eligible patients.

Topics: Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multimorbidity; Rivaroxaban

The devastating Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is associated with a high prothrombotic state. It is unclear if the coagulation abnormalities occur because of the direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 or indirectly by the cytokine storm and endothelial damage or by a combination of mechanisms. There is a clear indication of in-hospital pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for every patient with COVID-19 after bleed risk assessment. However, there is much debate regarding the best dosage regimen, and there is no consensus on the role of extended thromboprophylaxis.. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 35 ± 4 days versus no intervention after hospital discharge in COVID-19 patients who were at increased risk for VTE and have received standard parenteral VTE prophylaxis during hospitalization. The composite efficacy endpoint is a combination of symptomatic VTE, VTE-related death, VTE detected by bilateral lower limbs venous duplex scan and computed tomography pulmonary angiogram on day 35 ± 4 posthospital discharge and symptomatic arterial thromboembolism (myocardial infarction, nonhemorrhagic stroke, major adverse limb events, and cardiovascular death) up to day 35 ± 4 posthospital discharge. The key safety outcome is the incidence of major bleeding according to ISTH criteria.. The MICHELLE trial is expected to provide high-quality evidence around the role of extended thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 and will help guide medical decisions in clinical practice.

Topics: Adult; Brazil; COVID-19; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Venous Thrombosis

Background Patients with single-ventricle physiology who undergo the Fontan procedure are at risk for thrombotic events associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The UNIVERSE Study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel liquid rivaroxaban formulation, using a body weight-adjusted dosing regimen, versus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in children post-Fontan. Methods and Results The UNIVERSE Study was a randomized, multicenter, 2-part, open-label study of rivaroxaban, in children who had undergone a Fontan procedure, to evaluate its dosing regimen, safety, and efficacy. Part A was the single-arm part of the study that determined the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban in 12 participants before proceeding to part B, whereby 100 participants were randomized 2:1 to open-label rivaroxaban versus ASA. The study period was 12 months. A total of 112 participants were enrolled across 35 sites in 10 countries. In part B, for safety outcomes, major bleeding occurred in one participant on rivaroxaban (epistaxis that required transfusion). Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 6% of participants on rivaroxaban versus 9% on ASA. Trivial bleeding occurred in 33% of participants on rivaroxaban versus 35% on ASA. For efficacy outcomes, 1 participant on rivaroxaban in part B had a pulmonary embolism (2% overall event rate); and for ASA, 1 participant had ischemic stroke and 2 had venous thrombosis (9% overall event rate). Conclusions In this study, participants who received rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis had a similar safety profile and fewer thrombotic events, albeit not statistically significant, compared with those in the ASA group. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02846532.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Child; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

The aim of this AFIRE (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease) trial subgroup analysis was to examine rivaroxaban monotherapy benefits and their relation to the time between stenting and enrollment among patients after coronary stenting.. Of 2,215 patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease in the AFIRE trial, rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet therapy (combination therapy) in terms of efficacy and superior for safety endpoints. However, thrombotic risk after antiplatelet therapy cessation remained a concern among 1,444 patients who had undergone coronary stenting >1 year before enrollment.. The benefits of rivaroxaban monotherapy in coronary stenting subgroups were assessed for efficacy (a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death of any cause), safety (major bleeding defined according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria), ischemic endpoints, net adverse clinical event, and time between stenting and enrollment.. Efficacy and safety endpoints for monotherapy were superior to combination therapy, with HRs of 0.70 for efficacy (95% CI: 0.50-0.98; P = 0.036) and 0.55 for safety (95% CI: 0.33-0.92; P = 0.019). For ischemic endpoints, the HR was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.58-1.15; P = 0.240). The HR became smaller with longer time between stenting and enrollment (efficacy, P for interaction = 0.158; safety, P = 0.097).. In patients with atrial fibrillation after coronary stenting, the benefits of rivaroxaban monotherapy for efficacy and safety endpoints were consistent with those in the whole AFIRE trial population. The benefits became apparent with longer time between stenting and enrollment. (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Study [AFIRE]; UMIN000016612, NCT02642419).

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aftercare; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Patient Discharge; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The COMPASS trial demonstrated that the combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily and aspirin 100 mg once daily compared with aspirin 100 mg once daily reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease by 24% during a mean follow-up of 23 months. We explored whether this effect varies by sex.. The effects were examined in women and men using log-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier curve. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained from stratified Cox proportional hazards models to explore subgroup effects including subgroup of women and men according to baseline modified REACH risk score. Of 27 395 patients randomized, 18 278 were allocated to receive rivaroxaban plus aspirin (n = 9152) or aspirin alone (n = 9126), and of these, 22.1% were women. Women compared with men had similar incidence rates for MACE and major bleeding but borderline lower rates for myocardial infarction (1.7% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.05). The effect of combination therapy compared with aspirin in women and men was consistent for MACE (women: 3.8% vs. 5.2%, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.97; men: 4.2% vs. 5.5%, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66-0.89; P interaction 0.75) and major bleeding (women: 3.1% vs. 1.4%, HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.42-3.46; men: 3.2% vs. 2.0%, HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.29-1.97; P interaction 0.19). There was no significant interaction between randomized treatment and baseline modified REACH score above or below the median for MACE or major bleeding.. In patients with stable coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease, the combination of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) and aspirin compared with aspirin alone appears to produce consistent benefits in women and men, independent of baseline cardiovascular risk.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Comorbidity; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Health Status Disparities; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Low-dose rivaroxaban reduced major adverse cardiac and limb events among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASCVD) in the COMPASS trial. The objective of our study was to evaluate the eligibility and budgetary impact of the COMPASS trial in a real-world population.. The VA administrative and clinical databases were utilized to conduct a cross-sectional study to identify patients eligible for low-dose rivaroxaban receiving care at all 141 facilities between October 1, 2014 and September 30, 2015. Proportion of patients with stable ASCVD eligible for low-dose rivaroxaban and prevalence of multiple risk enrichment criteria among eligible patients. Pharmaceutical budgetary impact using VA pharmacy pricing. Chi-squared and Student's t tests were used to compare patients eligible versus ineligible patients.. From an initial cohort of 1,248,214 patients with ASCVD, 488,495 patients (39.1%) met trial eligibility criteria. Eligible patients were older (74.2 vs 64.5 years) with higher proportion of hypertension (84.1% vs 82.1%) and diabetes (46.2% vs 32.9) compared with ineligible patients (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). A median of 38.7% (IQR 4.6%) of total ASCVD patients per facility were rivaroxaban eligible. Estimated annual VA pharmacy budgetary impact would range from $0.47 billion to $1.88 billion for 25% to 100% treatment penetration. Annual facility level pharmaceutical budgetary impact would be a median of $12.3 million (IQR $8.0-$16.3 million) for treatment of all eligible patients. Among eligible patients, age greater than 65 years was the most common risk enrichment factor (86.9%). Prevalence of eligible patients with multiple enrichment factors varied from 34.2% (one factor) to 6.2% (four or more).. Over one third of patients with stable ASCVD may qualify for low-dose rivaroxaban within the VA. Additional studies are needed to understand eligibility in other populations and a formal cost-effectiveness analysis is warranted.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Budgets; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cigarette Smoking; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Health Expenditures; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; United States; United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LE-PAD) experience an increased risk of major vascular events. There is limited information on what clinical features of symptomatic LE-PAD prognosticate major vascular events and whether patients at high risk have a greater absolute benefit from low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin.. To quantify the risk of major vascular events and investigate the response to treatment with low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin among patients with symptomatic LE-PAD based on clinical presentation and comorbidities.. This is a subanalysis of a previously reported subgroup of patients with symptomatic LE-PAD who were enrolled in a large, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies [COMPASS]) in 602 centers in 33 countries from March 2013 to January 2020. Data analysis was completed from May 2016 to June 2020.. A combination of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone.. Thirty-month incidence risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE) including major vascular amputation, and bleeding.. The COMPASS trial enrolled 4129 patients with symptomatic LE-PAD (mean [SD] age, 66.8 [8.8] years; 2932 men [71.0%]). The 30-month Kaplan-Meier incidence risk of MACE or MALE, including major amputation, was 22.6% in those with prior amputation (this outcome was observed in 54 patients), 17.6% (n = 15) in those with Fontaine III or IV symptoms, and 11.8% (n = 142) in those with previous peripheral artery revascularization, classifying these features as high-risk limb presentations. The 30-month incidence risk of MACE or MALE, including major amputation, was 14.1% (n = 118) in those with kidney dysfunction, 13.5% (n = 67) in those with heart failure, 13.4% (n = 199) in those with diabetes, and 12.8% (n = 222) in those with polyvascular disease, classifying these features as high-risk comorbidities. Among patients with either high-risk limb presentations or high-risk comorbidities, treatment with rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone was associated with an estimated 4.2% (95% CI, 1.9%-6.2%) absolute risk reduction for MACE or MALE, including major amputation, at 30 months. Although the estimated absolute risk increase of major bleeding was higher with rivaroxaban and aspirin in combination than aspirin alone (2.0% [95% CI, 0.5%-3.9%]) for patients with either high-risk limb presentation or high-risk comorbidity, the estimated absolute risk increase of fatal or critical organ bleeding was low in this high-risk group (0.4% [95% CI, 0.2%-1.8%]), such that the net clinical benefit was estimated to be 3.2% (95% CI, 0.6%-5.3%).. Patients with LE-PAD with high-risk limb presentations or high-risk comorbidities had a high incidence of major vascular events. For these patients, treatment with rivaroxaban and aspirin in combination compared with aspirin alone led to a large absolute reduction in vascular risk.

Topics: Aged; Amputation, Surgical; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke

The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter remain uncertain. DESIGN: RIVER was an academic-led, multicenter, open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial with blinded outcome adjudication that enrolled 1005 patients from 49 sites in Brazil. Patients with a bioprosthetic mitral valve and atrial fibrillation or flutter were randomly assigned (1:1) to rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (15 mg in those with creatinine clearance <50 mL/min) or dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-30.); the follow-up period was 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack, major bleeding, valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, or hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary composite outcome, bleeding events, and venous thromboembolism. SUMMARY: RIVER represents the largest trial specifically designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a direct oral anticoagulant in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter. The results of this trial can inform clinical practice and international guidelines.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Bioprosthesis; Brazil; Cause of Death; Creatinine; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Mitral Valve; Rivaroxaban; Sample Size; Stroke; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pilot Projects; Rivaroxaban

To date, vitamin K antagonists are the only available oral anticoagulants in patients with mechanical heart valves. In this way, we developed a pilot trial with rivaroxaban..  The RIWA study was a proof-of-concept, open-label, randomized clinical trial and was designed to assess the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events of the rivaroxaban-based strategy (15 mg twice daily) in comparison to dose-adjusted warfarin. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio and were followed prospectively for 90 days..  A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the present study. Of these, 44 patients were randomized: 23 patients were allocated to the rivaroxaban group and 21 to the warfarin group. After 90 days of follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in one patient (4.3%) in the rivaroxaban group and three patients (14.3%) in the warfarin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-2.85; P = 0.25). Minor bleeding (without discontinuation of medical therapy) occurred in six patients (26.1%) in the rivaroxaban group versus six patients (28.6%) in the warfarin group (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.23-3.32; P = 0.85). One patient in the warfarin group died from myocardial infarction. No cases of hemorrhagic stroke, valve thrombosis, peripheral embolic events, or new intracardiac thrombus were related in both groups.. In this pilot study, rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily had thromboembolic and bleeding events similar to warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. These data confirm the authors' proof-of-concept and suggest that a larger trial with a similar design is not unreasonable. CLINICALTRIAL.. NCT03566303.

Topics: Adult; Brain Infarction; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Female; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

ROCKET AF demonstrated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients enrolled in Latin America compared with the rest of the world (ROW).. ROCKET AF enrolled 14,264 patients from 45 countries. Of these, 1,878 (13.2%) were from 7 Latin American countries. The clinical characteristics and outcomes (adjusted by baseline characteristics) of these patients were compared with 12,293 patients from the ROW. Treatment outcomes of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin were also stratified by region.. The annual rate of stroke/SE was similar in those from Latin American and ROW (P= .63), but all-cause and vascular death were significantly higher than in ROW (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.20-1.64; HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.68; P< .001). Rates of major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding tended to be lower in Latin America (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-1.0; P= .05). Rates of stroke and/or SE were similar with rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients from Latin America and ROW (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.29 vs HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.07; interaction P= .77).. Patients with AF in Latin America had similar rates of stroke and/or SE, higher rates of vascular death, and lower rates of bleeding compared with patients in the ROW. The effect of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in Latin America was similar to the ROW. Further studies analyzing patient- and country-specific determinants of these regional differences in Latin America are warranted.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Latin America; Male; Mortality; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

COVID-19 is associated with both venous and arterial thrombotic complications. While prophylactic anticoagulation is now widely recommended for hospitalized patients with COVID-19, the effectiveness and safety of thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with COVID-19 has not been established.. PREVENT-HD is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, pragmatic, event-driven phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in symptomatic outpatients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 at risk for thrombotic events, hospitalization, and death. Several challenges posed by the pandemic have necessitated innovative approaches to clinical trial design, start-up, and conduct. Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by time from COVID-19 confirmation, to either rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily or placebo for 35 days. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, non-central nervous system systemic embolization, all-cause hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. The primary safety end point is fatal and critical site bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition. Enrollment began in August 2020 and is expected to enroll approximately 4,000 participants to yield the required number of end point events.. PREVENT-HD is a pragmatic trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban in the outpatient setting to reduce major venous and arterial thrombotic events, hospitalization, and mortality associated with COVID-19.

Topics: Adult; Cause of Death; COVID-19; Double-Blind Method; Extremities; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospital Mortality; Hospitalization; Humans; Ischemia; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Outpatients; Placebos; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

In the AFIRE trial, rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy with rivaroxaban and an antiplatelet agent for thromboembolic events or death, and superior for major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease. Little is known about impacts of stroke and bleeding risks on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban monotherapy.. In this subanalysis of the AFIRE trial, we assessed the risk of stroke and bleeding by the CHADS. Rivaroxaban monotherapy significantly reduced the primary efficacy and safety end points with no evidence of differential effects by stroke risk (CHADS. The advantages of rivaroxaban monotherapy compared with those of combination therapy with respect to all prespecified end points, including thromboembolism, bleeding, and mortality were similar across patients with AF and stable coronary artery disease, irrespective of their risk for stroke and bleeding.. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000016612, and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02642419.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Adjustment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

In patients with normal renal function or early stage CKD, the risk-benefit profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is superior to that of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In patients on hemodialysis, the comparative efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs are unknown.. In the Valkyrie study, 132 patients on hemodialysis with atrial fibrillation were randomized to a VKA with a target INR of 2-3, 10 mg rivaroxaban daily, or rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 for 18 months. Patients continued the originally assigned treatment and follow-up was extended for at least an additional 18 months. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. Secondary efficacy end points were individual components of the composite outcome and all-cause death. Safety end points were life-threatening, major, and minor bleeding.. Median (IQR) follow-up was 1.88 (1.01-3.38) years. Premature, permanent discontinuation of anticoagulation occurred in 25% of patients. The primary end point occurred at a rate of 63.8 per 100 person-years in the VKA group, 26.2 per 100 person-years in the rivaroxaban group, and 21.4 per 100 person-years in the rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 group. The estimated competing risk-adjusted hazard ratio for the primary end point was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.68;. In patients on hemodialysis with atrial fibrillation, a reduced dose of rivaroxaban significantly decreased the composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and major bleeding complications compared with VKA.. Oral Anticoagulation in Hemodialysis, NCT03799822.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Mortality; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K; Vitamin K 2

Observational studies have suggested a higher risk of thrombotic events in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Moreover, elevated D-dimer levels have been identified as an important prognostic marker in COVID-19 directly associated with disease severity and progression. Prophylactic anticoagulation for hospitalized COVID-19 patients might not be enough to prevent thrombotic events; therefore, therapeutic anticoagulation regimens deserve clinical investigation.. ACTION is an academic-led, pragmatic, multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase IV clinical trial that aims to enroll around 600 patients at 40 sites participating in the Coalition COVID-19 Brazil initiative. Eligible patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 with symptoms up to 14 days and elevated D-dimer levels will be randomized to a strategy of full-dose anticoagulation for 30 days with rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (or full-dose heparin if oral administration is not feasible) vs standard of care with any approved venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimen during hospitalization. A confirmation of COVID-19 was mandatory for study entry, based on specific tests used in clinical practice (RT-PCR, antigen test, IgM test) collected before randomization, regardless of in the outpatient setting or not. Randomization will be stratified by clinical stability at presentation. The primary outcome is a hierarchical analysis of mortality, length of hospital stay, or duration of oxygen therapy at the end of 30 days. Secondary outcomes include the World Health Organization's 8-point ordinal scale at 30 days and the following efficacy outcomes: incidence of venous thromboembolism , acute myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, major adverse limb events, duration of oxygen therapy, disease progression, and biomarkers. The primary safety outcomes are major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria.. The ACTION trial will evaluate whether in-hospital therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban for stable patients, or enoxaparin for unstable patients, followed by rivaroxaban through 30 days compared with standard prophylactic anticoagulation improves clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and elevated D-dimer levels.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Brazil; COVID-19; Drug Administration Schedule; Enoxaparin; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Time Factors

COVID-19 is associated with a prothrombotic state leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Whether therapeutic anticoagulation improves outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 is unknown. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of therapeutic versus prophylactic anticoagulation in this population.. We did a pragmatic, open-label (with blinded adjudication), multicentre, randomised, controlled trial, at 31 sites in Brazil. Patients (aged ≥18 years) hospitalised with COVID-19 and elevated D-dimer concentration, and who had COVID-19 symptoms for up to 14 days before randomisation, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either therapeutic or prophylactic anticoagulation. Therapeutic anticoagulation was in-hospital oral rivaroxaban (20 mg or 15 mg daily) for stable patients, or initial subcutaneous enoxaparin (1 mg/kg twice per day) or intravenous unfractionated heparin (to achieve a 0·3-0·7 IU/mL anti-Xa concentration) for clinically unstable patients, followed by rivaroxaban to day 30. Prophylactic anticoagulation was standard in-hospital enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. The primary efficacy outcome was a hierarchical analysis of time to death, duration of hospitalisation, or duration of supplemental oxygen to day 30, analysed with the win ratio method (a ratio >1 reflects a better outcome in the therapeutic anticoagulation group) in the intention-to-treat population. The primary safety outcome was major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding through 30 days. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04394377) and is completed.. From June 24, 2020, to Feb 26, 2021, 3331 patients were screened and 615 were randomly allocated (311 [50%] to the therapeutic anticoagulation group and 304 [50%] to the prophylactic anticoagulation group). 576 (94%) were clinically stable and 39 (6%) clinically unstable. One patient, in the therapeutic group, was lost to follow-up because of withdrawal of consent and was not included in the primary analysis. The primary efficacy outcome was not different between patients assigned therapeutic or prophylactic anticoagulation, with 28 899 (34·8%) wins in the therapeutic group and 34 288 (41·3%) in the prophylactic group (win ratio 0·86 [95% CI 0·59-1·22], p=0·40). Consistent results were seen in clinically stable and clinically unstable patients. The primary safety outcome of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 26 (8%) patients assigned therapeutic anticoagulation and seven (2%) assigned prophylactic anticoagulation (relative risk 3·64 [95% CI 1·61-8·27], p=0·0010). Allergic reaction to the study medication occurred in two (1%) patients in the therapeutic anticoagulation group and three (1%) in the prophylactic anticoagulation group.. In patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and elevated D-dimer concentration, in-hospital therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or enoxaparin followed by rivaroxaban to day 30 did not improve clinical outcomes and increased bleeding compared with prophylactic anticoagulation. Therefore, use of therapeutic-dose rivaroxaban, and other direct oral anticoagulants, should be avoided in these patients in the absence of an evidence-based indication for oral anticoagulation.. Coalition COVID-19 Brazil, Bayer SA.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Brazil; COVID-19; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Endpoint Determination; Enoxaparin; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Discharge; Rivaroxaban; SARS-CoV-2; Treatment Outcome

Subclinical leaflet thickening and reduced leaflet motion of bioprosthetic aortic valves have been documented by four-dimensional computed tomography (CT). Whether anticoagulation can reduce these phenomena after transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) is not known.. In a substudy of a large randomized trial, we randomly assigned patients who had undergone successful TAVR and who did not have an indication for long-term anticoagulation to a rivaroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy (rivaroxaban [10 mg] plus aspirin [75 to 100 mg] once daily) or an antiplatelet-based strategy (clopidogrel [75 mg] plus aspirin [75 to 100 mg] once daily). Patients underwent evaluation by four-dimensional CT at a mean (±SD) of 90±15 days after randomization. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with at least one prosthetic valve leaflet with grade 3 or higher motion reduction (i.e., involving >50% of the leaflet). Leaflet thickening was also assessed.. A total of 231 patients were enrolled. At least one prosthetic valve leaflet with grade 3 or higher motion reduction was found in 2 of 97 patients (2.1%) who had scans that could be evaluated in the rivaroxaban group, as compared with 11 of 101 (10.9%) in the antiplatelet group (difference, -8.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -16.5 to -1.9; P = 0.01). Thickening of at least one leaflet was observed in 12 of 97 patients (12.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 33 of 102 (32.4%) in the antiplatelet group (difference, -20.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -30.9 to -8.5). In the main trial, the risk of death or thromboembolic events and the risk of life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding were higher with rivaroxaban (hazard ratios of 1.35 and 1.50, respectively).. In a substudy of a trial involving patients without an indication for long-term anticoagulation who had undergone successful TAVR, a rivaroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy was more effective than an antiplatelet-based strategy in preventing subclinical leaflet-motion abnormalities. However, in the main trial, the rivaroxaban-based strategy was associated with a higher risk of death or thromboembolic complications and a higher risk of bleeding than the antiplatelet-based strategy. (Funded by Bayer; GALILEO-4D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02833948.).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Valve; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Whether the direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban can prevent thromboembolic events after transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) is unclear.. We randomly assigned 1644 patients without an established indication for oral anticoagulation after successful TAVR to receive rivaroxaban at a dose of 10 mg daily (with aspirin at a dose of 75 to 100 mg daily for the first 3 months) (rivaroxaban group) or aspirin at a dose of 75 to 100 mg daily (with clopidogrel at a dose of 75 mg daily for the first 3 months) (antiplatelet group). The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of death or thromboembolic events. The primary safety outcome was major, disabling, or life-threatening bleeding. The trial was terminated prematurely by the data and safety monitoring board because of safety concerns.. After a median of 17 months, death or a first thromboembolic event (intention-to-treat analysis) had occurred in 105 patients in the rivaroxaban group and in 78 patients in the antiplatelet group (incidence rates, 9.8 and 7.2 per 100 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio with rivaroxaban, 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.81; P = 0.04). Major, disabling, or life-threatening bleeding (intention-to-treat analysis) had occurred in 46 and 31 patients, respectively (4.3 and 2.8 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.37; P = 0.08). A total of 64 deaths occurred in the rivaroxaban group and 38 in the antiplatelet group (5.8 and 3.4 per 100 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.53).. In patients without an established indication for oral anticoagulation after successful TAVR, a treatment strategy including rivaroxaban at a dose of 10 mg daily was associated with a higher risk of death or thromboembolic complications and a higher risk of bleeding than an antiplatelet-based strategy. (Funded by Bayer and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; GALILEO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02556203.).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is one of the main treatments for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients on effective anticoagulation. The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) has increased, given their efficacy and safety profile compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA). We compared procedural and clinical outcomes of MT in patients on DOA and VKA treatment before stroke onset. We analyzed 2 groups from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke prospective registry: patients on DOA and patients on VKA treated by MT without thrombolysis. Generalized linear mixed models including center as random effect were used to compare angiographic (rates of reperfusion at end of procedure, number of passes >2, procedural complications) and clinical (favorable and excellent outcome, 90-day all-cause mortality, and hemorrhagic complications) outcomes according to anticoagulation subgroups. Comparisons were adjusted for prespecified confounders (age, admission NIH Stroke Scale score) as well as for meaningful baseline between-group differences. Among 221 patients included, more DOA-treated patients (n = 115, 52%) achieved successful (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score [mTICI] 2b/3) or near complete (mTICI 2c/3) reperfusion at the procedure end than did VKA-treated patients, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for DOA vs VKA of 3.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-7.65) and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.08-3.73), respectively. DOA-treated patients had a lower 90-day mortality risk with an adjusted OR of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.24-0.89) and a better excellent outcome OR of 2.40 (1.10-5.27). There was no significant between-group difference in hemorrhagic or procedural complications. The study highlights the benefits of DOA compared to VKA. Regarding mortality, excellent outcomes, and recanalization rate, DOA appears to provide a favorable setting for MT treatment in AIS.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Reperfusion; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombectomy; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Patients with renal impairment are at higher risk of thrombosis and bleeding than those with normal renal function. The optimal rivaroxaban dose for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with renal impairment is unknown. MARINER and MAGELLAN were multicenter, randomized clinical trials of rivaroxaban in acutely ill medical patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with renal impairment in MARINER (7.5 mg once daily) were compared with those in patients with normal renal function in MARINER (10 mg once daily) and in a subpopulation of MAGELLAN that excluded patients at high risk for bleeding at baseline (10 mg once daily). Compared with enoxaparin/placebo in the MAGELLAN subpopulation, the relative risk (RR) of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related death with rivaroxaban 10 mg in patients with renal impairment (RR = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-1.44) was similar to that in those with normal renal function (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.44-1.40), while in MARINER, the 7.5 mg dose did not reduce the risk in patients with renal impairment (hazard ratio = 1.00; 95% CI 0.52-1.92). Major bleeding with rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily was higher in patients with renal impairment than in those with normal renal function in MAGELLAN (1.54% vs. 0.98%) and in the MAGELLAN subpopulation (0.94% vs. 0.61%). At a dose of 10 mg once daily, rivaroxaban is effective for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with impaired or normal renal function. The safety of this regimen is enhanced without loss of efficacy by excluding patients at high risk for bleeding, but not by using a reduced-dose strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION:  ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00571649 for the MAGELLAN trial, NCT02111564 for the MARINER trial.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Patients with peripheral artery disease who have undergone lower-extremity revascularization are at high risk for major adverse limb and cardiovascular events. The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in this context are uncertain.. In a double-blind trial, patients with peripheral artery disease who had undergone revascularization were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin or placebo plus aspirin. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of acute limb ischemia, major amputation for vascular causes, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding, defined according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) classification; major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) was a secondary safety outcome.. A total of 6564 patients underwent randomization; 3286 were assigned to the rivaroxaban group, and 3278 were assigned to the placebo group. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 508 patients in the rivaroxaban group and in 584 in the placebo group; the Kaplan-Meier estimates of the incidence at 3 years were 17.3% and 19.9%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 0.96; P = 0.009). TIMI major bleeding occurred in 62 patients in the rivaroxaban group and in 44 patients in the placebo group (2.65% and 1.87%; hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.97 to 2.10; P = 0.07). ISTH major bleeding occurred in 140 patients in the rivaroxaban group, as compared with 100 patients in the placebo group (5.94% and 4.06%; hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.84; P = 0.007).. In patients with peripheral artery disease who had undergone lower-extremity revascularization, rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin was associated with a significantly lower incidence of the composite outcome of acute limb ischemia, major amputation for vascular causes, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes than aspirin alone. The incidence of TIMI major bleeding did not differ significantly between the groups. The incidence of ISTH major bleeding was significantly higher with rivaroxaban and aspirin than with aspirin alone. (Funded by Bayer and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; VOYAGER PAD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02504216.).

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Combined Modality Therapy; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endovascular Procedures; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Ischemia; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lower Extremity; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban

Nonmajor orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs that results in transient reduced mobility places patients at risk for venous thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban may be noninferior to enoxaparin with regard to the prevention of major venous thromboembolism in these patients.. In this international, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned adult patients undergoing lower-limb nonmajor orthopedic surgery who were considered to be at risk for venous thromboembolism on the basis of the investigator's judgment to receive either rivaroxaban or enoxaparin. The primary efficacy outcome of major venous thromboembolism was a composite of symptomatic distal or proximal deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or venous thromboembolism-related death during the treatment period or asymptomatic proximal deep-vein thrombosis at the end of treatment. A test for superiority was planned if rivaroxaban proved to be noninferior to enoxaparin. For all outcomes, multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Prespecified safety outcomes included major bleeding (fatal, critical, or clinically overt bleeding or bleeding at the surgical site leading to intervention) and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding.. A total of 3604 patients underwent randomization; 1809 patients were assigned to receive rivaroxaban, and 1795 to receive enoxaparin. Major venous thromboembolism occurred in 4 of 1661 patients (0.2%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 18 of 1640 patients (1.1%) in the enoxaparin group (risk ratio with multiple imputation, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.75; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P = 0.01 for superiority). The incidence of bleeding did not differ significantly between the rivaroxaban group and the enoxaparin group (1.1% and 1.0%, respectively, for major bleeding or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding; 0.6% and 0.7%, respectively, for major bleeding).. Rivaroxaban was more effective than enoxaparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolic events during a period of immobilization after nonmajor orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs. (Funded by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne and Bayer; PRONOMOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02401594.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Lower Extremity; Male; Middle Aged; Orthopedic Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Recently, the randomized EINSTEIN-Jr study showed similar efficacy and safety for rivaroxaban and standard anticoagulation for treatment of pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE). The rivaroxaban dosing strategy was established based on phase 1 and 2 data in children and through pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling.. Rivaroxaban treatment with tablets or the newly developed granules-for-oral suspension formulation was bodyweight-adjusted and administered once-daily, twice-daily, or thrice-daily for children with bodyweights of ≥30, ≥12 to <30, and <12 kg, respectively. Previously, these regimens were confirmed for children weighing ≥20 kg but only predicted in those <20 kg. Based on sparse blood sampling, the daily area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC. Of the 335 children (aged 0-17 years) allocated to rivaroxaban, 316 (94.3%) were evaluable for PK analyses. Rivaroxaban exposures were within the adult exposure range. No clustering was observed for any of the PK parameters with efficacy, bleeding, or adverse event outcomes. Results were similar for the tablet and suspension formulation. Acceptability and palatability of the suspension were favorable.. Based on this analysis and the recently documented similar efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with standard anticoagulation, we conclude that bodyweight-adjusted pediatric rivaroxaban regimens with either tablets or suspension are validated and provide for appropriate treatment of children with VTE.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Child; Child, Preschool; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Anticoagulant plasma concentrations and patient characteristics might affect the benefit-risk balance of therapy. The study objective was to assess the impact of model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics on outcomes in patients receiving rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (VTE-P) after hip/knee replacement surgery. Post hoc exposure-response analyses were conducted using data from the phase 3 RECORD1-4 studies, in which 12,729 patients were randomized to rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily or enoxaparin for ≤ 39 days. Multivariate regression approaches were used to correlate model-predicted individual rivaroxaban exposures and patient characteristics with outcomes. In the absence of measured rivaroxaban exposure, exposure estimates were predicted based on individual increases in prothrombin time (PT) and by making use of the known correlation between rivaroxaban plasma concentration and dynamics of PT. No significant associations between rivaroxaban exposure and total VTE or major bleeding were identified. A significant association between exposure and a composite of major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding from day 4 after surgery was observed. The relationship was shallow, with an approximate predicted absolute increase in a composite of major or NMCR bleeding from 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.54] to 2.18% (95% CI 1.51-3.17) at the 5th and 95th percentiles of trough plasma concentration, respectively. In conclusion, based on the underlying data and analysis, no reliable target window for exposure with improved benefit-risk could be identified within the investigated exposure range. Hence, monitoring rivaroxaban levels is unlikely to be beneficial in VTE-P.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Biomarkers, Pharmacological; Chemoprevention; Drug Monitoring; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Prothrombin Time; Risk Adjustment; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics may affect the rivaroxaban benefit-risk balance. This study aimed to quantify associations between model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics and efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), using data from the phase 3 ROCKET AF trial (NCT00403767). In ROCKET AF, 14,264 patients with NVAF were randomized to rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily [OD], or 15 mg OD if creatinine clearance was 30-49 mL/min) or dose-adjusted warfarin (median follow-up: 707 days); rivaroxaban plasma concentration was measured in a subset of 161 patients. In this post hoc exposure-response analysis, a multivariate Cox model was used to correlate individual predicted rivaroxaban exposures and patient characteristics with time-to-event efficacy and safety outcomes in 7061 and 7111 patients, respectively. There was no significant association between model-predicted rivaroxaban trough plasma concentration (C

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers, Pharmacological; Chemoprevention; Drug Monitoring; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Prognosis; Prothrombin Time; Risk Adjustment; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a neglected disease affecting 33 million people, mainly in low and middle income countries. Yet very few large trials or registries have been conducted in this population. The INVICTUS program of research in RHD consists of a randomized-controlled trial (RCT) of 4500 patients comparing rivaroxaban with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with RHD and atrial fibrillation (AF), a registry of 17,000 patients to document the contemporary clinical course of patients with RHD, including a focused sub-study on pregnant women with RHD within the registry. This paper describes the rationale, design, organization and baseline characteristics of the RCT and a summary of the design of the registry and its sub-study. Patients with RHD and AF are considered to be at high risk of embolic strokes, and oral anticoagulation with VKAs is recommended for stroke prevention. But the quality of anticoagulation with VKA is poor in developing countries. A drug which does not require monitoring, and which is safe and effective for preventing stroke in patients with valvular AF, would fulfill a major unmet need.. The INVestIgation of rheumatiC AF Treatment Using VKAs, rivaroxaban or aspirin Studies (INVICTUS-VKA) trial is an international, multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel group trial, testing whether rivaroxaban 20 mg given once daily is non-inferior (or superior) to VKA in patients with RHD, AF, and an elevated risk of stroke (mitral stenosis with valve area ≤2 cm. INVICTUS is the largest program of clinical research focused on a neglected cardiovascular disease and will provide new information on the clinical course of patients with RHD, and approaches to anticoagulation in those with concomitant AF.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Rheumatic Heart Disease; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Risks, sites, and predictors of major bleeding during antithrombotic therapies have not been well defined for patients with recent embolic stroke of undetermined source.. Exploratory analysis of major bleeds defined by International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria occurring among 7213 participants in international NAVIGATE (New Approach Rivaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global Trial) embolic stroke of undetermined source randomized trial comparing rivaroxaban 15 mg daily with aspirin 100 mg daily.. During a median follow-up of 11 months, 85 major bleeds occurred. The most frequent site was gastrointestinal (38%), followed by intracranial (29%). Assignment to rivaroxaban (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7 [95% CI, 1.7-4.3]), East Asia region (HR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.6-3.9]), systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg (HR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2-3.8]), and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR, 1.2 per 10 mL/min per 1.73 m. Among embolic stroke of undetermined source patients participating in an international randomized trial, independent predictors of major bleeding were assignment to rivaroxaban, East Asia region, increased systolic blood pressure, and impaired renal function. East Asia as a region was strongly associated with risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. Estimated glomerular filtration rate should be a consideration for stratifying bleeding risk. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02313909.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Asia, Eastern; Asian People; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Hospitalized acutely ill medical patients are at risk for fatal and major thromboembolic events. Whether use of extended-duration primary thromboprophylaxis can prevent such events is unknown.. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether extended-duration rivaroxaban reduces the risk of venous and arterial fatal and major thromboembolic events without significantly increasing major bleeding in acutely ill medical patients after discharge.. MARINER (A Study of Rivaroxaban [JNJ-39039039] on the Venous Thromboembolic Risk in Post-Hospital Discharge Patients) studied acutely ill medical patients with additional risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Medically ill patients with a baseline creatinine clearance ≥50 ml/min were randomized in a double-blind fashion to rivaroxaban 10 mg or placebo daily at hospital discharge for 45 days. Exploratory efficacy analyses were performed with the intent-to-treat population including all data through day 45. Time-to-event curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A blinded independent committee adjudicated all clinical events.. In total, 4,909 patients were assigned to rivaroxaban and 4,913 patients to placebo. The mean age was 67.8 years, 55.5% were men, mean baseline creatinine clearance was 87.8 ml/min, and mean duration of hospitalization was 6.7 days. The pre-specified composite efficacy endpoint (symptomatic VTE, myocardial infarction, nonhemorrhagic stroke, and cardiovascular death) occurred in 1.28% and 1.77% of patients in the rivaroxaban and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.52 to 1.00; p = 0.049), whereas major bleeding occurred in 0.27% and 0.18% of patients in the rivaroxaban and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio: 1.44; 95% confidence interval: 0.62 to 3.37; p = 0.398).. Extended-duration rivaroxaban in hospitalized medically ill patients resulted in a 28% reduction in fatal and major thromboembolic events without a significant increase in major bleeding. (A Study of Rivaroxaban [JNJ-39039039] on the Venous Thromboembolic Risk in Post-Hospital Discharge Patients [MARINER]; NCT02111564).

Topics: Acute Disease; Aftercare; Aged; Chemoprevention; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Discharge; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Pancreatic cancer patients are at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE); the value of thromboprophylaxis has not been definitively established.. This trial randomized cancer patients initiating a new regimen and at high risk for VTE (Khorana score ≥2) to rivaroxaban 10 mg or placebo up to day 180. This analysis examined the subset of pancreatic cancer patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), asymptomatic proximal DVT, any pulmonary embolism, and VTE-related death. The primary safety endpoint was International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-defined major bleeding.. In total, 49/1080 (4.5%) patients enrolled had baseline VTE on screening, with higher rates (24/362 [6.6%]) in pancreatic cancer and they were not randomized. Of 841 randomized patients, 273 (32.5%) had pancreatic cancer; 155/273 (57% in each arm) completed the double-blind period. The primary endpoint occurred in 13/135 (9.6%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and in 18/138 (13.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.34-1.43; P = .328) in up-to-day-180 period and 5/135 (3.7%) patients receiving rivaroxaban and 14/138 (10.1%) receiving placebo in the intervention period (HR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.97; P = .034). Major bleeding was similar (2 [1.5%] receiving rivaroxaban and 3 [2.3%] receiving placebo). Correlative biomarker studies demonstrated significant decline in D-dimer (weeks 8 and 16) in patients randomized to rivaroxaban compared to placebo (P < .01).. In ambulatory pancreatic cancer patients, rivaroxaban did not result in significantly lower incidence of VTE or VTE-related death in the 180-day period. During the intervention period, however, rivaroxaban substantially reduced VTE without increasing major bleeding, suggesting benefit of rivaroxaban prophylaxis in this setting.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02555878.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Outpatients; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Placebos; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The effects of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve remain uncertain.. In this randomized trial, we compared rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) with dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) in patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve. The primary outcome was a composite of death, major cardiovascular events (stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, valve thrombosis, or hospitalization for heart failure), or major bleeding at 12 months.. A total of 1005 patients were enrolled at 49 sites in Brazil. A primary-outcome event occurred at a mean of 347.5 days in the rivaroxaban group and 340.1 days in the warfarin group (difference calculated as restricted mean survival time, 7.4 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.4 to 16.3; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Death from cardiovascular causes or thromboembolic events occurred in 17 patients (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 26 (5.1%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.20). The incidence of stroke was 0.6% in the rivaroxaban group and 2.4% in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.88). Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (1.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 13 (2.6%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.35). The frequency of other serious adverse events was similar in the two groups.. In patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the mean time until the primary outcome of death, major cardiovascular events, or major bleeding at 12 months. (Funded by PROADI-SUS and Bayer; RIVER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02303795.).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bioprosthesis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mitral Valve; Rivaroxaban; Single-Blind Method; Stroke; Warfarin

Although randomized trials provide a high level of evidence regarding the efficacy of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), the results of such trials may differ from those observed in day-to-day clinical practice.. To compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding (MB) between NOAC and warfarin in clinical practice.. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who started warfarin/NOACs between January 2015 and November 2016 were retrospectively identified from Korea's nationwide health insurance claims database. Using inpatient diagnosis and imaging records, the Cox models with inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for NOACs relative to warfarin.. Of the 48,389 patients, 10,548, 11,414, 17,779 and 8,648 were administered apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin, respectively. Many patients had suffered prior strokes (36.7%, 37.7%, 31.4%, and 32.2% in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively), exhibited high CHA2DS2-VASc (4.8, 4.6, 4.6, and 4.1 in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively) and HAS-BLED (3.7, 3.6, 3.6, and 3.3 in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively) scores, had received antiplatelet therapy (75.4%, 75.7%, 76.8%, and 70.1% in apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin group, respectively), or were administered reduced doses of NOACs (49.8%, 52.9%, and 42.8% in apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban group, respectively). Apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban showed a significantly lower S/SE risk [HR, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.62, 0.54-0.71; 0.60, 0.53-0.69; and 0.71, 0.56-0.88, respectively] than warfarin. Apixaban and dabigatran (HR, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.51-0.66 and 0.75, 0.60-0.95, respectively), but not rivaroxaban (HR, 95% CI: 0.84, 0.69-1.04), showed a significantly lower MB risk than warfarin.. Among Asian patients who were associated with higher bleeding risk, low adherence, and receiving reduced NOAC dose than that provided in randomised controlled trials, all NOACs were associated with a significantly lower S/SE risk and apixaban and dabigatran with a significantly lower MB risk than warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Anticoagulant treatment of pediatric cerebral venous thrombosis has not been evaluated in randomized trials. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban and standard anticoagulants in the predefined subgroup of children with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) who participated in the EINSTEIN-Jr trial. Children with CVT were randomized (2:1), after initial heparinization, to treatment with rivaroxaban or standard anticoagulants (continued on heparin or switched to vitamin K antagonist). The main treatment period was 3 months. The primary efficacy outcome, symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and principal safety outcome, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding,were centrally evaluated by blinded investigators. Sinus recanalization on repeat brain imaging was a secondary outcome. Statistical analyses were exploratory. In total, 114 children with confirmed CVT were randomized. All children completed the follow-up. None of the 73 rivaroxaban recipients and 1 (2.4%; CVT) of the 41 standard anticoagulant recipients had symptomatic, recurrent VTE after 3 months (absolute difference, 2.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.6% to 13.5%). Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 5 (6.8%; all nonmajor and noncerebral) rivaroxaban recipients and in 1 (2.5%; major [subdural] bleeding) standard anticoagulant recipient (absolute difference, 4.4%; 95% CI, -6.7% to 13.4%). Complete or partial sinus recanalization occurred in 18 (25%) and 39 (53%) rivaroxaban recipients and in 6 (15%) and 24 (59%) standard anticoagulant recipients, respectively. In summary, in this substudy of a randomized trial with a limited sample size, children with CVT treated with rivaroxaban or standard anticoagulation had a low risk of recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02234843.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Child; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Rivaroxaban has been shown to be efficacious for treatment of venous thromboembolism in adults, and has a reduced risk of bleeding compared with standard anticoagulants. We aimed to develop paediatric rivaroxaban regimens for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in children and adolescents.. In this phase 2 programme, we did three studies to evaluate rivaroxaban treatment in children younger than 6 months, aged 6 months to 5 years, and aged 6-17 years. Our studies used a multicentre, single-arm design at 54 sites in Australia, Europe, Israel, Japan, and north America. We included children with objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism previously treated with low-molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux, or a vitamin K antagonist for at least 2 months or, in children who had catheter-related venous thromboembolism for at least 6 weeks. We administered rivaroxaban orally in a bodyweight-adjusted 20 mg-equivalent dose, based on physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling predictions and EINSTEIN-Jr phase 1 data in young adults, in either a once-daily (tablets; for those aged 6-17 years), twice-daily (in suspension; for those aged 6 months to 11 years), or three times-daily (in suspension; for those younger than 6 months) dosing regimen for 30 days (or 7 days for those younger than 6 months). The primary aim was to define rivaroxaban treatment regimens that match the target adult exposure range. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Analyses were per-protocol. The predefined efficacy outcomes were symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism, asymptomatic deterioration on repeat imaging at the end of the study treatment period. These trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02564718, NCT02309411, and NCT02234843.. Between Feb 11, 2013, and Dec 20, 2017, we enrolled 93 children (ten children younger than 6 months; 15 children aged 6 months to 1 year; 25 children aged 2-5 years; 32 children aged 6-11 years; and 11 children aged 12-17 years) into our study. 89 (96%) children completed study treatment (30 days of treatment, or 7 days in those younger than 6 months), and 93 (100%) children received at least one dose of study treatment and were evaluable for the primary endpoints. None of the children had a major bleed, and four (4%, 95% CI 1·2-10·6) of these children had a clinically relevant non-major bleed (three children aged 12-17 years with menorrhagia and one child aged 6-11 years with gingival bleeding). We found no symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism in any patients (0%, 0·0-3·9). 24 (32%) of 75 patients with repeat imaging had their thrombotic burden resolved, 43 (57%) patients improved, and eight (11%) patients were unchanged. No patient deteriorated. We confirmed therapeutic rivaroxaban exposures with once-daily dosing in children with bodyweights of at least 30 kg and with twice-daily dosing in children with bodyweights of at least 20 kg and less than 30 kg. Children with low bodyweights (<20 kg, particularly <12 kg) showed low exposures so, for future studies, rivaroxaban dosages were revised for these weight categories, to match the target adult exposure range. 61 (66%) of 93 children had adverse events during the study. Pyrexia was the most common adverse event (ten [11%] events), and anaemia and neutropenia or febrile neutropenia were the most frequent grade 3 or worse events (four [4%] events each). No children died or were discontinued from rivaroxaban because of adverse events.. Treatment with bodyweight-adjusted rivaroxaban appears to be safe in children. The treatment regimens that we confirmed in children with bodyweights of at least 20 kg and the revised treatment regimens that we predicted in those with bodyweights less than 20 kg will be evaluated in the EINSTEIN-Jr phase 3 trial in children with acute venous thromboembolism.. Bayer AG, Janssen Research and Development.

Topics: Adolescent; Anemia; Anticoagulants; Body Weight; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Dosage Calculations; Factor Xa; Female; Half-Life; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infant; Male; Neutropenia; Prothrombin Time; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Disease Management; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Guideline Adherence; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Stroke is often a devastating event among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection (HFrEF). In COMMANDER HF, rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. did not reduce the composite of first occurrence of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction compared with placebo in patients with HFrEF, coronary artery disease (CAD), and sinus rhythm. We now examine the incidence, timing, type, severity, and predictors of stroke or a transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and seek to establish the net clinical benefit of treatment with low-dose rivaroxaban.. In this double-blind, randomized trial, 5022 patients who had HFrEF(≤40%), elevated natriuretic peptides, CAD, and who were in sinus rhythm were treated with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. or placebo in addition to antiplatelet therapy, after an episode of worsening HF. The primary neurological outcome for this post hoc analysis was time to first event of any stroke or TIA. Over a median follow-up of 20.5 (25th-75th percentiles 20.0-20.9) months, 150 all-cause stroke (127) or TIA (23) events occurred (ischaemic stroke in 82% and haemorrhagic stroke in 11% of stroke events). Overall, 47.5% of first-time strokes were either disabling (16.5%) or fatal (31%). Prior stroke, low body mass index, geographic region, and the CHA2DS2-VASc score were predictors of stroke/TIA. Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the primary neurological endpoint of all-cause stroke or TIA compared with placebo by 32% (1.29 events vs. 1.90 events per 100 patient-years), adjusted for the time from index HF event to randomization and stratified by geographic region (adjusted hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.94), with a number needed to treat of 164 patients per year to prevent one stroke/TIA event. The principal safety endpoint of fatal bleeding or bleeding into a critical space, occurred at a similar rate on rivaroxaban and placebo (0.44 events vs. 0.55 events per 100 patient-years).. Patients with HFrEF and CAD are at risk for stroke or TIA in the period following an episode of worsening heart failure in the absence of atrial fibrillation. Most strokes are of ischaemic origin and nearly half are either disabling or fatal. Rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg b.i.d. reduced rates of stroke or TIA compared with placebo in this population.. COMMANDER HF (A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Reducing the Risk of Death, Myocardial Infarction, or Stroke in Participants with Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Following an Episode of Decompensated Heart Failure); ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01877915.

Topics: Aged; Brain Ischemia; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Placebos; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume

Adding rivaroxaban to aspirin in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease reduces the recurrence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) but increases the risk of major bleeding. The aim of this study was to estimate the individual lifetime treatment benefit and harm of adding low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin in patients with stable cardiovascular disease.. Patients with established CVD from the COMPASS trial (n = 27 390) and SMART prospective cohort study (n = 8139) were used. Using the pre-existing lifetime SMART-REACH model for recurrent CVD, and a newly developed Fine and Gray competing risk-adjusted lifetime model for major bleeding, individual treatment effects from adding low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin in patients with stable CVD were estimated, expressed in terms of (i) life-years free of stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) gained; and (ii) life-years free from major bleeding lost. Calibration of the SMART-REACH model for prediction of recurrent CVD events in the COMPASS study was good. The major bleeding risk model as derived in the COMPASS trial showed good external calibration in the SMART cohort. Predicted individual gain in life expectancy free of stroke or MI from added low-dose rivaroxaban had a median of 16 months (range 1-48 months), while predicted individualized lifetime lost in terms of major bleeding had a median of 2 months (range 0-20 months).. There is a wide distribution in lifetime gain and harm from adding low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin in individual patients with stable CVD. Using these lifetime models, benefits and bleeding risk can be weighed for each individual patient, which could facilitate treatment decisions in clinical practice.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

In patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease, the combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily and aspirin 100 mg once daily compared with aspirin 100 mg once daily reduced major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality and increased bleeding.. This study sought to explore the effects of the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin on sites, timing, severity, and management of bleeding in the COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) study.. This study reports, by treatment group, the number and proportion of patients; hazard rate ratios for bleeding according to site and severity; the timing of bleeding using landmark analyses; and the number and proportion of patients who received blood products and other hemostatic treatments.. Of 27,395 patients enrolled (mean age 68 years, 22% women), 18,278 were randomized to the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin or to aspirin alone and followed for a mean of 23 months. Compared with aspirin alone, the combination increased modified International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis major bleeding (288 of 9,152 [3.1%] vs. 170 of 9,126 [1.9%]), (HR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.05; p < 0.001), International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis major bleeding (206 of 9,152 [2.3%] vs. 116 of 9,126 [1.3%]), (HR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.41 to 2.23; p < 0.0001), and minor bleeding (838 of 9,152 [9.2%] vs. 503 of 9,126 [5.5%]), (HR: 1.70; 95% CI 1.52 to 1.90; p < 0.0001); the combination also increased the need for any red cell transfusion (87 of 9,152 [1.0%] vs. 44 of 9,126 [0.5%]), (HR: 1.97; 95% CI 1.37 to 2.83, p = 0.0002). The gastrointestinal (GI) tract was the most common site of increased major bleeding (140 of 9,152 [1.5%] vs. 65 of 9,126 [0.7%]), (HR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.60 to 2.89; p < 0.001), and the increase in bleeding was predominantly in the first year after randomization. Approximately one-third of major GI bleeding was gastric or duodenal, one-third was colonic or rectal, and one-third was from an unknown GI site. The study investigators reported that approximately three-quarters of major bleeding episodes were of mild or moderate intensity. A similar proportion of patients in each treatment group who experienced major bleeding received platelets, clotting factors, or other hemostatic agents.. The combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone increased major bleeding, mainly from the GI tract. Most excess bleeding occurred during the first year after randomization, was of mild or moderate intensity, and was managed with conventional supportive therapy. (Rivaroxaban for the Prevention of Major Cardiovascular Events in Coronary or Peripheral Artery Disease [COMPASS]; NCT01776424).

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Combinations; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index

The potential role of new oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) remains uncertain.. To determine whether rivaroxaban is noninferior to dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for thrombotic APS.. 3-year, open-label, randomized noninferiority trial. (EU Clinical Trials Register: EUDRA [European Union Drug Regulatory Authorities] code 2010-019764-36).. 6 university hospitals in Spain.. 190 adults (aged 18 to 75 years) with thrombotic APS.. Rivaroxaban (20 mg/d or 15 mg/d, according to renal function) versus dose-adjusted VKAs (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0, or 3.1 to 4.0 in patients with a history of recurrent thrombosis).. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with new thrombotic events; the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The prespecified noninferiority margin for risk ratio (RR) was 1.40. Secondary outcomes included time to thrombosis, type of thrombosis, changes in biomarker levels, cardiovascular death, and nonmajor bleeding.. After 3 years of follow-up, recurrent thrombosis occurred in 11 patients (11.6%) in the rivaroxaban group and 6 (6.3%) in the VKA group (RR in the rivaroxaban group, 1.83 [95% CI, 0.71 to 4.76]). Stroke occurred more commonly in patients receiving rivaroxaban (9 events) than in those receiving VKAs (0 events) (corrected RR, 19.00 [CI, 1.12 to 321.9]). Major bleeding occurred in 6 patients (6.3%) in the rivaroxaban group and 7 (7.4%) in the VKA group (RR, 0.86 [CI, 0.30 to 2.46]). Post hoc analysis suggested an increased risk for recurrent thrombosis in rivaroxaban-treated patients with previous arterial thrombosis, livedo racemosa, or APS-related cardiac valvular disease.. Anticoagulation intensity was not measured in the rivaroxaban group.. Rivaroxaban did not show noninferiority to dose-adjusted VKAs for thrombotic APS and, in fact, showed a non-statistically significant near doubling of the risk for recurrent thrombosis.. Bayer Hispania.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Among stented patients with atrial fibrillation, double therapy with a novel oral anticoagulant plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) reduces bleeding or cardiovascular rehospitalizations compared with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) based triple therapy regimen. A recent study demonstrated that apixaban based double therapy reduced bleeding compared with VKA based double therapy. However, it remains unknown whether rivaroxaban based double therapy is superior to a VKA based double therapy.. Patient with stented atrial fibrillation (n=2124) were randomized to 3 groups: rivaroxaban 15 mg od plus a P2Y. Among stented patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban plus SAPT was superior to warfarin plus SAPT in lowering total bleeding and cardiovascular rehospitalization.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01830543.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Readmission; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Recently non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) is replacing warfarin for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, the role of NOAC after thrombolysis of acute iliofeomral DVT (IFDVT) is not yet defined. This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban versus warfarin after catheter directed thrombolysis of an IFDVT. Patients with acute DVT of both the iliac and the femoral vein (n = 72) were recruited and randomized to either standard anticoagulation (enoxaparin and warfarin, n = 35) or rivaroxaban (n = 37) after successful thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. Primary efficacy outcome was a recurrence of any venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 6 months. Secondary safety outcomes included major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), other adverse event, and all-cause mortality. Rate of recurrent VTE were similar in both groups (11.4% versus 12.5%; p = 0.94). Major bleeding or CRNMB was less in rivaroxaban group without significance (2.9% versus 9.4%, HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.03-2.96; p = 0.31). Recurrence-free survival and major bleeding-free survival at 6 months were not different in both groups. After thrombolysis of acute IFDVT, rivaroxaban was as safe and effective as warfarin in preventing DVT recurrence.

Topics: Aged; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Retreatment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombolytic Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

Limited data are available regarding the efficacy of rivaroxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of VTE in active cancer patients.. In this prospective, multicenter, open-label trial (NCT01989845), we enrolled patients with active cancer and objectively diagnosed lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), or both from November 2013 to June 2016. Active cancer was defined as a histologically confirmed malignancy, which was diagnosed or treated within the previous 6 months, or as a recurrent/ metastatic cancer. Patients received oral rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily for first 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily for 6 months. The primary outcome was the symptomatic recurrent VTE and the secondary outcomes included any recurrent VTE, major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding events, and overall mortality. All study outcomes were validated by blinded central adjudication.. Of 124 patients enrolled, 110 (88.7%) had solid cancer, 93 (75.0%) had metastatic disease, and 110 (88.7%) were receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. During the 6-month study period, seven patients experienced symptomatic recurrent VTE (cumulative incidence, 5.9%), and two patients experienced incidental recurrent PE (cumulative incidence of any recurrent VTE, 7.6%). Major bleeding events occurred in six patients (cumulative incidence, 5.3%) and CRNM bleeding events in 11 patients (cumulative incidence, 10.2%). Twenty-eight patients (overall mortality, 24.0%) died.. Rivaroxaban is effective and safe for the treatment of VTE in patients with active cancer.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Coagulation; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Recurrence; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Anticoagulation therapy is the main line of treatment for acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in the absence of cirrhosis. However, the use of this therapy in cirrhotic PVT is still with doubtful evidence. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin for the management of acute non-neoplastic PVT in Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related compensated cirrhosis.. Out of 578 patients with chronic HCV infection, 80 patients with acute PVT who had undergone splenectomy due to hypersplenism and 4 patients with acute PVT due to portal pyemia were selected. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the study group (n = 40), in which the patients received rivaroxaban 10 mg/12 h, or the control group (n = 40), in which the patients received warfarin.. In the rivaroxaban group, the resolution of PVT was achieved in 34 patients (85%) within 2.6 ± 0.4 months and delayed, partial recanalization after 6.7 ± 1.2 months (n = 6.15%). Complications such as major bleeding, abnormal liver functions, death, or recurrence did not occur during treatment, and patients in this group showed improved short-term survival rate (20.4 ± 2.2 months) compared to the survival rate in the control group (10.6 ± 1.8 months) in which warfarin achieved complete resolution in 45% of patients. Complications such as severe upper GI tract bleeding (43.3%), hepatic decompensation (22.5%), progression to mesenteric ischemia (12.5%), recurrence (10%), and death (20%) were observed in the control group. The duration until complete resolution of thrombus correlated with age, the extent of the thrombus, creatinine level, and MELD score. The recurrence after complete resolution of thrombus correlated with age, the extent of the thrombus, thrombogenic gene polymorphism, and the use of warfarin.. Rivaroxaban was effective and safe in acute HCV-related non-neoplastic PVT with improved short-term survival rate; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03201367.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Computed Tomography Angiography; Egypt; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Phlebography; Portal Vein; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

The management of anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer is challenging due to increased thrombotic and bleeding risks. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients with AF and a history of cancer.. ROCKET AF randomized 14 264 patients with AF to rivaroxaban or warfarin with a median follow-up of 1.9 years. Cox regression models were used to assess the association between cancer history and clinical outcomes, and the relative treatment effect of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in these patients. A total of 640 patients enrolled in ROCKET AF had a history of cancer, with the most common types being prostate (28.6%), colorectal (16.1%), and breast (14.7%) cancer. Patients with a history of cancer were older, more frequently male, more likely to have prior vitamin K antagonist (VKA) use and had higher rates of overall bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.47; P < 0.0001] and non-cardiovascular death (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.04-2.07; P = 0.031) compared with those with no cancer history. There were no significant associations between cancer history and stroke, venous thromboembolism, or myocardial infarction. The relative efficacy of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin for prevention of stroke/systemic embolism was similar in those with and without a history of cancer (interaction P-value = 0.21).. In ROCKET AF, a history of cancer was associated with a higher risk of bleeding and non-cardiovascular death, but not ischaemic events. The relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin were not significantly different in patients with and without a history of cancer. The results of this study are exploratory and should be taken in context of the study population, which may not be generalizable to those with advanced malignancy. Further investigation is needed to understand optimal anticoagulation strategies in patients with AF and cancer.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Australia; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Patient Readmission; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Although a recent expert consensus statement has recommended periprocedural uninterrupted (UI) non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) as a Class I indication, there have been no clear randomized trials. We investigated the safety and efficacy of UI, procedure day single-dose skipped (SDS), and 24-hour skipped (24S) NOACs in patients undergoing AF ablation.. In this prospective, open-label, randomized multicentre trial, 326 patients (75% male, 58 ± 11 years old) scheduled for AF catheter ablation were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to UI, SDS, and 24S at three tertiary hospitals. Bridging with low molecular weight heparin was carried out in the patients with persistent AF who were assigned to the 24S group. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban were assigned in order after randomization. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bleeding events within 1 month after ablation. The secondary endpoints included thrombo-embolic and other procedure-related complications. The intra-procedural heparin requirement was higher in the 24S group than others (P < 0.001), and the mean activated clotting time was comparable among the groups (P = 0.139). The incidence of major bleeding up to 1 month after ablation and a post-procedural reduction in the haemoglobin levels did not significantly differ among the treatment groups and different NOACs (P > 0.05). There were no fatal events or thrombo-embolic complications in all the three groups.. In patients undergoing AF ablation, UI NOACs and SDS or double dose skipped NOACs had a comparable efficacy and safety, regardless of the type of NOAC.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Incidence; Intraoperative Care; Male; Middle Aged; Preoperative Care; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Whole Blood Coagulation Time

Some experimental studies have shown that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have anti-inflammatory effects. However, the interval changes in inflammatory markers in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who receive DOACs remain unknown. Between July 2013 and April 2014, a total of 187 AF patients randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban (n = 91) or dabigatran (n = 96) were assessed for eligibility. The levels of the following inflammatory markers were serially evaluated: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, pentraxin-3, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, growth and differentiation factor-15, and soluble thrombomodulin (sTM). The aim in this study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients with AF, in addition to the impact of markers on bleeding events. Finally, 117 patients (rivaroxaban: n = 55, dabigatran: n = 62) were included in the analysis at 12 months. Although the interval changes in sTM levels tended to be greater in the dabigatran group [0.3 (0-0.7) vs. 0.5 (0-1.0) FU/ml, p = 0.061], there were no significant differences in the interval changes in any inflammatory marker between 2 groups. There were no significant differences in bleeding events between 2 groups. The interval changes in sTM levels were significantly greater in patients with bleeding compared with those without [0.8 (0.5-1.3) vs. 0.4 (- 0.1-0.8) FU/ml, p = 0.017]. There were no significant differences in the interval changes in any inflammatory marker between rivaroxaban and dabigatran treatments in patients with AF. The increased levels of sTM after DOACs treatment might be related to bleeding events.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Prospective Studies; Regression Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke

Although acetylsalicylic acid is of proven benefit for secondary prevention in patients with cardiovascular disease, the risk of recurrent ischemic events remains high. Intensification of antithrombotic therapy with more potent antiplatelet drugs, dual antiplatelet therapy, or vitamin K antagonists further reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with acetylsalicylic acid alone but increases the risk of bleeding without reducing mortality. In patients with prior coronary artery disease or peripheral arterial disease the COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) trial revealed that compared with acetylsalicylic acid alone, dual pathway inhibition with low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice-daily), an oral factor Xa inhibitor, plus acetylsalicylic acid reduced major adverse cardiovascular event by 24%, major adverse limb events by 47%, and mortality by 18%. Major bleeding was increased by 70%, but there was no increase in fatal or intracranial bleeding. This article (1) reviews the results of the COMPASS trial, (2) explains why dual pathway inhibition is superior to antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy alone, (3) compares the results with rivaroxaban plus aspirin with those with other antithrombotic regimens, and (4) provides insight into how best to apply the COMPASS results into practice.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chronic Disease; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Recurrence; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

Among atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention enrolled in PIONEER AF-PCI (An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study Exploring Two Treatment Strategies of Rivaroxaban and a Dose-Adjusted Oral Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment Strategy in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), it is unclear if the observed reduction in bleeding events with rivaroxaban regimens is consistent across a range of the international normalized ratio (INR) among subjects administrated Vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-triple therapy. This analysis compares the occurrence of clinically significant bleeding between rivaroxaban and VKA strategies, according to INR stability of subjects administrated VKA.. A total of 2124 atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to 3 groups: rivaroxaban 15 mg od plus a P2Y. Among atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, rivaroxaban-based therapy was superior to warfarin plus dual antiplatelet therapy in lowering bleeding outcomes regardless of the INR stability.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01830543.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Ambulatory patients receiving systemic cancer therapy are at varying risk for venous thromboembolism. However, the benefit of thromboprophylaxis in these patients is uncertain.. In this double-blind, randomized trial involving high-risk ambulatory patients with cancer (Khorana score of ≥2, on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of venous thromboembolism), we randomly assigned patients without deep-vein thrombosis at screening to receive rivaroxaban (at a dose of 10 mg) or placebo daily for up to 180 days, with screening every 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of objectively confirmed proximal deep-vein thrombosis in a lower limb, pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis in an upper limb or distal deep-vein thrombosis in a lower limb, and death from venous thromboembolism and was assessed up to day 180. In a prespecified supportive analysis involving the same population, the same end point was assessed during the intervention period (first receipt of trial agent to last dose plus 2 days). The primary safety end point was major bleeding.. Of 1080 enrolled patients, 49 (4.5%) had thrombosis at screening and did not undergo randomization. Of the 841 patients who underwent randomization, the primary end point occurred in 25 of 420 patients (6.0%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 37 of 421 (8.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 1.09; P = 0.10) in the period up to day 180. In the prespecified intervention-period analysis, the primary end point occurred in 11 patients (2.6%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 27 (6.4%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.80). Major bleeding occurred in 8 of 405 patients (2.0%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 4 of 404 (1.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.59 to 6.49).. In high-risk ambulatory patients with cancer, treatment with rivaroxaban did not result in a significantly lower incidence of venous thromboembolism or death due to venous thromboembolism in the 180-day trial period. During the intervention period, rivaroxaban led to a substantially lower incidence of such events, with a low incidence of major bleeding. (Funded by Janssen and others; CASSINI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02555878.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Chronic kidney disease is associated with an increased risk of both bleeding and ischemic cardiovascular events.. The purpose of this study was to determine the balance of risks and benefits from the dual pathway antithrombotic regimen (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily [bd] plus aspirin, compared with aspirin) in vascular patients with or without moderate renal dysfunction.. This was a secondary analysis of the COMPASS (Cardiovascular OutcoMes for People using Anticoagulation StrategieS) trial involving 27,395 patients with chronic coronary or peripheral artery disease.. In COMPASS, 21,111 patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at baseline of ≥60 ml/min, 6,276 had a GRF of <60 ml/min. Both the primary efficacy outcome (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and major bleeding were more frequent in those with renal dysfunction, and the frequency of these outcome events was inversely related to GFR. However, the primary outcome was consistently reduced with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg bd plus aspirin, irrespective of GFR category (GFR ≥60 ml/min, 3.5% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 4.5% aspirin alone, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64 to 0.90; GFR <60 ml/min, 6.4% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 8.4% aspirin alone, HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.94). Major bleeding was more frequent with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in those with GFR ≥60 ml/min (2.9% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 1.6% aspirin alone, HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.44 to 2.28) and similarly in those with GFR <60 ml/min (3.9% rivaroxaban plus aspirin, 2.7% aspirin alone, HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.05 to 2.07).. The benefits of the dual pathway COMPASS regimen (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg bd plus aspirin), versus aspirin alone, are preserved in patients with moderate renal dysfunction without evidence of an excess hazard of bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Correlation of Data; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Adjustment; Rivaroxaban

Physician behavior in response to knowledge of a patient's CYP2C19 clopidogrel metabolizer status is unknown.. To investigate the association of mandatory reporting of CYP2C19 pharmacogenomic testing, provided to investigators with no direct recommendations on how to use these results, with changes in P2Y12 inhibitor use, particularly clopidogrel, in the Randomized Trial to Compare the Safety of Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin in Addition to Either Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndrome (GEMINI-ACS-1) clinical trial.. The GEMINI-ACS-1 trial compared rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg twice daily, with aspirin, 100 mg daily, plus open-label clopidogrel or ticagrelor (provided), in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The trial included 371 clinical centers in 21 countries and 3037 patients with ACS. Data were analyzed between May 2017 and February 2019.. Investigators were required to prestipulate their planned response to CYP2C19 metabolizer status. In response to a regulatory mandate, results for all patients were reported to investigators approximately 1 week after randomization.. Reasons for switching P2Y12 inhibitors and occurrence of bleeding and ischemic events were collected.. Of 3037 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [9.0] years; 2275 men [74.9%], and 2824 white race/ethnicity [93.0%]), investigators initially treated 1704 (56.1%) with ticagrelor and 1333 (43.9%) with clopidogrel. Investigators prestipulated that they would use CYP2C19 metabolizer status to change P2Y12 inhibitor in 48.5% of genotyped clopidogrel-treated patients (n = 642 of 1324) and 5.5% of genotyped ticagrelor-treated patients (n = 93 of 1692). P2Y12 inhibitor switching for any reason occurred in 197 patients and was more common in patients treated with ticagrelor (146 of 1704 [8.6%]) compared with clopidogrel (51 of 1333 [3.8%]). Of patients initially treated with ticagrelor, only 1 (0.1% overall; 0.7% of all who switched) was switched based on CYP2C19 status. Of patients initially treated with clopidogrel, 23 (1.7% overall,;45.1% of all who switched) were switched owing to metabolizer status. Of 48 patients (3.6%) with reduced metabolizer status treated initially with clopidogrel, 15 (31.3%) were switched based on metabolizer status, including 48.1% (13 of 27) in which switching was prestipulated.. Physicians were evenly split on how to respond to knowledge of CYP2C19 metabolizer status in clopidogrel-treated patients. Mandatory provision of this information rarely prompted P2Y12 inhibitor switching overall, including a minority of patients with reduced metabolizer status. These findings highlight the clinical equipoise among physicians regarding use of this information and the reluctance to use information from routine genotyping in the absence of definitive clinical trial data demonstrating the efficacy of this approach.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02293395.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Rivaroxaban; Ticagrelor

Topics: Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban

To provide direct comparison between apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients with acute cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (Ca-VTE), consecutive patients treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, or enoxaparin at Mayo Thrombophilia Clinic (March 1, 2013 to January 31, 2018)) were followed prospectively. The primary effectiveness outcome was venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence, and the secondary was mortality. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, the secondary clinically relevant safety outcome was non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and the third a composite of major and CRNMB. There were 750 patients treated for acute Ca-VTE with apixaban (n = 224), rivaroxaban (n = 163), and enoxaparin (n = 363) within 14 days of diagnosis and for at least 3 months, or until study event. Recurrent VTE was diagnosed in 11 receiving apixaban, 7 receiving rivaroxaban (apixaban vs rivaroxaban hazard ratio (HR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.51-3.36) and 17 in the enoxaparin receiving group (apixaban vs enoxaparin HR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.54, 2.42 and rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin HR 0.85, 95% Cl: 0.36, 2.06). There were 82 deaths in apixaban, 74 rivaroxaban (apixaban vs rivaroxaban HR 1.67, 95% Cl: 1.20, 2.33) and 171 in enoxaparin group (rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin HR 0.73, 95% Cl: 0.56, 0.96). Major bleeding occurred in 11 apixaban, 12 rivaroxaban (apixaban vs rivaroxaban HR 0.73, 95% Cl: 0.32, 1.66) and 21 enoxaparin group (apixaban vs enoxaparin HR 0.89, 95% Cl: 0.43, 1.84 and rivaroxaban vs enoxaparin HR 1.23, 95% Cl: 0.61, 2.50). The CRNMB rate was higher in rivaroxaban compared to apixaban (P = .03) and LMWH (P = .01) groups. Recurrence of VTE and major bleeding were similar in apixaban, rivaroxaban, and enoxaparin groups. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher CRNMB but lower mortality compared to apixaban and enoxaparin.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Propensity Score; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Essentials Specific reversal agents for managing severe factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding are lacking. We assessed 4-factor-prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) and tranexamic acid (TXA). 4F-PCC, but not TXA, reduced the prothrombin time and increased endogenous thrombin potential. These agents may be viable options for reversal of therapeutic doses of rivaroxaban.. Background Oral activated factor X inhibitors such as rivaroxaban are widely used, but specific reversal agents are lacking. Although four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) and tranexamic acid (TXA) are sometimes used to manage serious bleeding, their efficacy is unknown. Prior studies in healthy subjects taking rivaroxaban revealed that 4F-PCC partially reverses the prolonged prothrombin time (PT), and fully restores the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP). The effect of TXA has not been evaluated. Methods In this double-blind, parallel-group study, 147 healthy volunteers given rivaroxaban 20 mg twice daily for 3 days were randomized after their morning dose on day 4 to receive intravenous 4F-PCC (50 IU kg

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antidotes; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kansas; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prothrombin Time; Rivaroxaban; Tranexamic Acid; Young Adult

Coronary artery disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and is a consequence of acute thrombotic events involving activation of platelets and coagulation proteins. Factor Xa inhibitors and aspirin each reduce thrombotic events but have not yet been tested in combination or against each other in patients with stable coronary artery disease.. In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, outpatient trial, patients with stable coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease were recruited at 602 hospitals, clinics, or community centres in 33 countries. This paper reports on patients with coronary artery disease. Eligible patients with coronary artery disease had to have had a myocardial infarction in the past 20 years, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, history of stable or unstable angina, previous multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention, or previous multi-vessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery. After a 30-day run in period, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive rivaroxaban (2·5 mg orally twice a day) plus aspirin (100 mg once a day), rivaroxaban alone (5 mg orally twice a day), or aspirin alone (100 mg orally once a day). Randomisation was computer generated. Each treatment group was double dummy, and the patients, investigators, and central study staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome of the COMPASS trial was the occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01776424, and is closed to new participants.. Between March 12, 2013, and May 10, 2016, 27 395 patients were enrolled to the COMPASS trial, of whom 24 824 patients had stable coronary artery disease from 558 centres. The combination of rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced the primary outcome more than aspirin alone (347 [4%] of 8313 vs 460 [6%] of 8261; hazard ratio [HR] 0·74, 95% CI 0·65-0·86, p<0·0001). By comparison, treatment with rivaroxaban alone did not significantly improve the primary outcome when compared with treatment with aspirin alone (411 [5%] of 8250 vs 460 [6%] of 8261; HR 0·89, 95% CI 0·78-1·02, p=0·094). Combined rivaroxaban plus aspirin treatment resulted in more major bleeds than treatment with aspirin alone (263 [3%] of 8313 vs 158 [2%] of 8261; HR 1·66, 95% CI 1·37-2·03, p<0·0001), and similarly, more bleeds were seen in the rivaroxaban alone group than in the aspirin alone group (236 [3%] of 8250 vs 158 [2%] of 8261; HR 1·51, 95% CI 1·23-1·84, p<0·0001). The most common site of major bleeding was gastrointestinal, occurring in 130 [2%] patients who received combined rivaroxaban plus aspirin, in 84 [1%] patients who received rivaroxaban alone, and in 61 [1%] patients who received aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced mortality when compared with aspirin alone (262 [3%] of 8313 vs 339 [4%] of 8261; HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·65-0·90, p=0·0012).. In patients with stable coronary artery disease, addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin lowered major vascular events, but increased major bleeding. There was no significant increase in intracranial bleeding or other critical organ bleeding. There was also a significant net benefit in favour of rivaroxaban plus aspirin and deaths were reduced by 23%. Thus, addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin has the potential to substantially reduce morbidity and mortality from coronary artery disease worldwide.. Bayer AG.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morbidity; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Patients with peripheral artery disease have an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Antiplatelet agents are widely used to reduce these complications.. This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial for which patients were recruited at 602 hospitals, clinics, or community practices from 33 countries across six continents. Eligible patients had a history of peripheral artery disease of the lower extremities (previous peripheral bypass surgery or angioplasty, limb or foot amputation, intermittent claudication with objective evidence of peripheral artery disease), of the carotid arteries (previous carotid artery revascularisation or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis of at least 50%), or coronary artery disease with an ankle-brachial index of less than 0·90. After a 30-day run-in period, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive oral rivaroxaban (2·5 mg twice a day) plus aspirin (100 mg once a day), rivaroxaban twice a day (5 mg with aspirin placebo once a day), or to aspirin once a day (100 mg and rivaroxaban placebo twice a day). Randomisation was computer generated. Each treatment group was double dummy, and the patient, investigators, and central study staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke; the primary peripheral artery disease outcome was major adverse limb events including major amputation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01776424, and is closed to new participants.. Between March 12, 2013, and May 10, 2016, we enrolled 7470 patients with peripheral artery disease from 558 centres. The combination of rivaroxaban plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone reduced the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (126 [5%] of 2492 vs 174 [7%] of 2504; hazard ratio [HR] 0·72, 95% CI 0·57-0·90, p=0·0047), and major adverse limb events including major amputation (32 [1%] vs 60 [2%]; HR 0·54 95% CI 0·35-0·82, p=0·0037). Rivaroxaban 5 mg twice a day compared with aspirin alone did not significantly reduce the composite endpoint (149 [6%] of 2474 vs 174 [7%] of 2504; HR 0·86, 95% CI 0·69-1·08, p=0·19), but reduced major adverse limb events including major amputation (40 [2%] vs 60 [2%]; HR 0·67, 95% CI 0·45-1·00, p=0·05). The median duration of treatment was 21 months. The use of the rivaroxaban plus aspirin combination increased major bleeding compared with the aspirin alone group (77 [3%] of 2492 vs 48 [2%] of 2504; HR 1·61, 95% CI 1·12-2·31, p=0·0089), which was mainly gastrointestinal. Similarly, major bleeding occurred in 79 (3%) of 2474 patients with rivaroxaban 5 mg, and in 48 (2%) of 2504 in the aspirin alone group (HR 1·68, 95% CI 1·17-2·40; p=0·0043).. Low-dose rivaroxaban taken twice a day plus aspirin once a day reduced major adverse cardiovascular and limb events when compared with aspirin alone. Although major bleeding was increased, fatal or critical organ bleeding was not. This combination therapy represents an important advance in the management of patients with peripheral artery disease. Rivaroxaban alone did not significantly reduce major adverse cardiovascular events compared with asprin alone, but reduced major adverse limb events and increased major bleeding.. Bayer AG.

Topics: Aged; Amputation, Surgical; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Carotid Artery Diseases; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Lower Extremity; Male; Middle Aged; Morbidity; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Pharmacokinetics and antithrombotic effects of the Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban were studied in subjects with mild renal insufficiency concurrently taking the P-glycoprotein and moderate CYP3A inhibitor verapamil, a drug commonly administered to patients with hypertension, ischemic heart disease, or atrial fibrillation. Age-matched controls with normal renal function were studied concurrently. Subjects' overall mean age was 59 years. Mean creatinine clearance values in the 2 groups were 105 and 71 mL/min. After single 20-mg oral doses, rivaroxaban area under the curve (AUC) was increased by a factor of 1.11 (ratio of geometric means [RGM]) in mild renal insufficiency compared to controls. Verapamil coadministration independently increased AUC to the same extent in both the mild renal insufficiency and control groups (RGM, 1.39 and 1.43). Concurrent mild renal insufficiency and verapamil produced additive inhibition compared to controls without verapamil (RGM, 1.58). Prothrombin time (PT) prolongation and Factor Xa inhibition tracked plasma rivaroxaban, and were enhanced by verapamil. Concentration-response relationships for PT (linear) and Factor Xa inhibition (hyperbolic) were unaffected by renal function or verapamil. The absolute and relative increases in rivaroxaban AUC caused by verapamil in mild renal insufficiency subjects are potentially associated with an increased bleeding risk. Modification of recommended dosage may be required in this combination of circumstances to reduce risk to patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prothrombin Time; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Verapamil

Current dosing recommendations for rivaroxaban advocate dosage reduction in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment and avoidance of concomitant strong inhibitors of CYP3A or P-glycoprotein. However, rivaroxaban dosing in patients with mild renal impairment taking concomitant moderate inhibitors of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein is not addressed. To quantify the impacts of concomitant verapamil administration and renal impairment on rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics, a minimal physiologically based pharmacokinetic model system was developed and used to evaluate potential increases in rivaroxaban exposure and the consequent increase in risk of major bleeding. Data from a phase 1, drug-drug interaction study were used to qualify the minimal physiologically based pharmacokinetic model system. Model-based simulations indicate that coadministration of rivaroxaban with verapamil substantially increases rivaroxaban exposure across all renal function categories, resulting in an exponential increase in bleeding risk. Reduction of the daily rivaroxaban dose to 10 to 15 mg reduces the major bleeding risk below the designated 4.5% threshold in the majority of patients with normal or mildly impaired renal function. A reduction to 10 mg daily in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment provides additional risk reduction so that 90% of those patients fall below the 4.5% threshold. A risk threshold of 4.5% was selected because it is the median predicted risk in patients treated concomitantly with ketoconazole, which is contraindicated for use with rivaroxaban. Patients taking both rivaroxaban and verapamil should take a reduced daily dose of rivaroxaban to minimize bleeding risk.

Topics: Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Renal Insufficiency; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Verapamil

Cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) have a two- to six-fold increased risk of anticoagulant-related major bleeding events compared with VTE patients without cancer. It is unknown whether major bleeding events are more severe in cancer patients than in those without cancer. Individual patient data from four randomized phase III trials that compared factor Xa inhibitors and vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of VTE were used to compare the severity of major bleeding events in patients with and without cancer. Using predefined criteria, the severity of the clinical presentation and course of major bleeding events were classified into four categories of increasing severity. A one-stage meta-analysis was used to evaluate the effect of cancer on the severity of the clinical presentation and course by estimating crude odds ratios (ORs) and ORs adjusted for age, sex and anticoagulant type with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study group comprised 290 patients with major bleeding, of whom 50 (17%) had cancer. The clinical presentation was judged to be severe (category 3 or 4) in 38% of patients with cancer and 44% of patients without cancer (adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.47-1.72). The clinical course was found to be severe in 20 and 25% of patients with and without cancer, respectively (adjusted OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.35-1.61). The present study suggests that the clinical presentation and course of anticoagulant-related major bleeding events are not more severe in cancer patients than in patients without cancer. This may be reassuring for physicians who treat cancer patients with anticoagulant-related bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Transfusion; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Odds Ratio; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

The first-line drugs for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) are non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which are preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). There is some evidence that there are dis-crepancies between everyday clinical practice and the guidelines.. The study aimed to compare the characteristics of patients on VKAs, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in everyday practice (i.e. baseline characteristics, drug doses, risk factors for bleeding and thromboembolic events). Additionally, we assessed the frequency of prescription of different oral anticoagulants (OACs) in recent years.. This study consisted of data from the multicentre CRAFT (MultiCentre expeRience in AFib patients Treated with OAC) study (NCT02987062). This was a retrospective analysis of hospital records of AF patients (hospitalised in the years 2011-2016) treated with VKAs (acenocoumarol, warfarin) and NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban). A total of 3528 patients with non-valvular AF were enrolled in the CRAFT study.. The total cohort consisted of 1973 patients on VKA, 504 patients on dabigatran, and 1051 patients on rivaroxaban. Patients on rivaroxaban were older (70.5 ± 13.1 years) and more often female (47.9%), compared with those on VKAs (67.0 ± 12.8 years, p < 0.001; 35.5%, p < 0.001) and on dabigatran (66.0 ± 13.9 years, p < 0.001; 38.9%, p = 0.001). Among NOACs, patients with persistent and permanent AF were more likely to receive rivaroxaban (54.7% and 73.4%, re-spectively) than dabigatran (45.3%, p < 0.001 and 26.6%, p = 0.002, respectively). Patients on rivaroxaban had higher risk of thromboembolic events (CHA2DS2VASc 3.9 ± 2.0, CHADS2 2.2 ± 1.4) than those on VKAs (3.3 ± 2.0, 1.9 ± 1.3) and on dabigatran (3.1 ± 2.0, 1.8 ± 1.3). Patients on rivaroxaban had also a higher rate of prior major bleeding (11.2%) than those on VKAs (6.7%, p < 0.001) and on dabigatran (7.3%, p = 0.02). Patients on lower doses of dabigatran and rivaroxaban had a significantly higher risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events. Use of VKAs in the year 2011 was reported in over 96% of patients on OACs, but this proportion decreased to 34.6% in 2016. In the last analysed year (2016) AF patients were treated mainly with NOACs - dabigatran (24.2%) and rivaroxaban (41.3%).. The prescription of VKAs declined significantly after the introduction of NOACs. Patients treated with different OACs demonstrated a distinct baseline clinical profile. The highest risk of thromboembolic events and incidence of major bleedings was observed in patients on rivaroxaban, in comparison to patients on VKAs and dabigatran. Among NOACs, patients treated with lower doses of dabigatran and rivaroxaban were older and had a significantly higher risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Clinical trials and meta-analyses have suggested that aspirin may be effective for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (proximal deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) after total hip or total knee arthroplasty, but comparisons with direct oral anticoagulants are lacking for prophylaxis beyond hospital discharge.. We performed a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial involving patients who were undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. All the patients received once-daily oral rivaroxaban (10 mg) until postoperative day 5 and then were randomly assigned to continue rivaroxaban or switch to aspirin (81 mg daily) for an additional 9 days after total knee arthroplasty or for 30 days after total hip arthroplasty. Patients were followed for 90 days for symptomatic venous thromboembolism (the primary effectiveness outcome) and bleeding complications, including major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (the primary safety outcome).. A total of 3424 patients (1804 undergoing total hip arthroplasty and 1620 undergoing total knee arthroplasty) were enrolled in the trial. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 11 of 1707 patients (0.64%) in the aspirin group and in 12 of 1717 patients (0.70%) in the rivaroxaban group (difference, 0.06 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.55 to 0.66; P<0.001 for noninferiority and P=0.84 for superiority). Major bleeding complications occurred in 8 patients (0.47%) in the aspirin group and in 5 (0.29%) in the rivaroxaban group (difference, 0.18 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.65 to 0.29; P=0.42). Clinically important bleeding occurred in 22 patients (1.29%) in the aspirin group and in 17 (0.99%) in the rivaroxaban group (difference, 0.30 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.07 to 0.47; P=0.43).. Among patients who received 5 days of rivaroxaban prophylaxis after total hip or total knee arthroplasty, extended prophylaxis with aspirin was not significantly different from rivaroxaban in the prevention of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01720108 .).

Topics: Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Aspirin; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The EINSTEIN-Extension trial (EINSTEIN-EXT) found that continued treatment with rivaroxaban for an additional 6 or 12 months (vs placebo) after 6-12 months of initial anticoagulation significantly reduced the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) with a small non-significant increased risk of major bleeding (none fatal or in critical site). This study aimed to compare total healthcare cost between rivaroxaban and placebo, based on the EINSTEIN-EXT event rates.. Total healthcare cost was calculated as the sum of treatment and clinical event costs from a US managed care perspective. Treatment duration and event rates were obtained from the EINSTEIN-EXT study. Adjustment on treatment duration was made by assuming a 10% non-adherence rate. Drug costs were based on wholesale acquisition costs. Cost estimates for clinical events (i.e. recurrent deep vein thrombosis [DVT], recurrent pulmonary embolism, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding) were determined from the literature. Results were examined over a ±20% range of each cost component and over 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of event rate differences in deterministic (one-way) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).. Total healthcare cost was $1,454 lower for rivaroxaban-treated (vs placebo-treated) patients in the base-case, with a lower clinical event cost fully offsetting drug cost. The cost savings of recurrent DVT alone (-$3,102) was greater than drug cost ($2,723). Total healthcare cost remained lower for rivaroxaban in the majority (73%) of PSA (cost difference [95% CI] = -$1,454 [-$2,396, $1,231]).. This study was conducted over the 1-year observation period of the EINSTEIN-EXT trial, which limited "real-world" applicability and examination of long-term economic impact. Assumptions on drug and clinical event costs were US-based and, thus, not applicable to other healthcare systems.. Total healthcare costs were estimated to be lower for patients continuing rivaroxaban therapy compared to those receiving placebo in VTE patients who had completed 6-12 months of VTE treatment.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Health Expenditures; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Econometric; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Venous Thromboembolism

The aim of this study was to determine the net clinical benefit (NCB) of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.. This was a retrospective analysis of 14,236 patients included in ROCKET AF who received at least one dose of study drug. We analyzed NCB using four different methods: (1) composite of death, stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, and major bleeding; (2) method 1 with fatal or critical organ bleeding substituted for major bleeding; (3) difference between the rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism minus 1.5 times the difference between the rate of intracranial hemorrhage; and (4) weighted sum of differences between rates of death, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, intracranial hemorrhage, and major bleeding.. Rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or systemic embolism (rate difference per 10,000 patient-years [RD]=-86.8 [95% CI -143.6 to -30.0]) and fatal or critical organ bleeding (-41.3 [-68 to -14.7]). However, rivaroxaban was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding other than fatal or critical organ bleeding (55.9 [14.7 to 97.2]). Method 1 showed no difference between treatments (-35.5 [-108.4 to 37.3]). Methods 2-4 favored treatment with rivaroxaban (2: -96.8 [-157.0 to -36.8]; 3: -65.2 [-112.3 to -17.8]; 4: -54.8 [-96.0 to -10.2]).. Rivaroxaban was associated with favorable NCB compared with warfarin. The NCB was attributable to lower rates of ischemic events and fatal or critical organ bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Internationality; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

This study sought to assess whether there were significant interactions of procedural access strategies and lesion characteristics with bleeding and ischemic events among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban or warfarin following a percutaneous coronary intervention.. Among stented AF patients, the impact of procedural access strategies or lesion characteristics on antithrombotic safety and efficacy outcomes is unclear.. In the PIONEER AF-PCI (An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study Exploring Two Treatment Strategies of Rivaroxaban and a Dose-Adjusted Oral Vitamin K Antagonist Treatment Strategy in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, 2,124 patients were randomized to 3 groups and followed for 12 months: 1) rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily plus a P2Y. Compared with warfarin, both rivaroxaban regimens consistently reduced clinically significant bleeding across subgroups of radial versus femoral arterial access and by vascular closure device use. Treatment effect of rivaroxaban on major adverse cardiovascular events did not vary when stratified by ischemia-driven revascularization, urgency of revascularization, location of culprit artery, presence of bifurcation lesion, presence of thrombus, type, and length of stent or number of stents (interaction p > 0.05 for all subgroups).. Among stented AF patients requiring long-term oral anticoagulation, there was no effect modification by procedure or lesion characteristics of either clinically significant bleeding or major adverse cardiovascular events. Rivaroxaban-based therapy was superior to warfarin plus DAPT in bleeding outcomes regardless of the type of stent or arterial access during the index coronary revascularization. (A Study Exploring Two Strategies of Rivaroxaban [JNJ39039039; BAY-59-7939] and One of Oral Vitamin K Antagonist in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PIONEER AF-PCI]; NCT01830543).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

In atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), anticoagulants are commonly used in combination with antiplatelet drugs. However, dual therapy can increase the risk of bleeding, and the potential therapeutic benefits must be weighed against this. Therefore, it is recommended that dual therapy is only used for a limited time, and that monotherapy with anticoagulants should start from 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there is a lack of evidence on the use of monotherapy, in particular with direct oral anticoagulants, in this group of patients.. The AFIRE Study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel group study conducted in patients aged ≥20 years with non-valvular AF (NVAF) and CAD. Patients who have undergone PCI or coronary artery bypass graft at least 1 year prior to enrollment, or those without significant coronary lesions requiring PCI (≥50% stenosis), will be included. Approximately 2200 participants will be randomized to receive either rivaroxaban monotherapy or rivaroxaban plus an antiplatelet drug (aspirin, clopidogrel, or prasugrel). The primary efficacy endpoints are the composite of cardiovascular events (stroke, non-central nervous system embolism, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina pectoris requiring revascularizations) and all-cause mortality. The primary safety endpoint is major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria.. This study will be the first to assess the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban monotherapy in NVAF patients with stable CAD.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Myocardial Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Embolic strokes of undetermined source represent 20% of ischemic strokes and are associated with a high rate of recurrence. Anticoagulant treatment with rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may result in a lower risk of recurrent stroke than aspirin.. We compared the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 15 mg) with aspirin (at a daily dose of 100 mg) for the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with recent ischemic stroke that was presumed to be from cerebral embolism but without arterial stenosis, lacune, or an identified cardioembolic source. The primary efficacy outcome was the first recurrence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism in a time-to-event analysis; the primary safety outcome was the rate of major bleeding.. A total of 7213 participants were enrolled at 459 sites; 3609 patients were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban and 3604 to receive aspirin. Patients had been followed for a median of 11 months when the trial was terminated early because of a lack of benefit with regard to stroke risk and because of bleeding associated with rivaroxaban. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 172 patients in the rivaroxaban group (annualized rate, 5.1%) and in 160 in the aspirin group (annualized rate, 4.8%) (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.33; P=0.52). Recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 158 patients in the rivaroxaban group (annualized rate, 4.7%) and in 156 in the aspirin group (annualized rate, 4.7%). Major bleeding occurred in 62 patients in the rivaroxaban group (annualized rate, 1.8%) and in 23 in the aspirin group (annualized rate, 0.7%) (hazard ratio, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.68 to 4.39; P<0.001).. Rivaroxaban was not superior to aspirin with regard to the prevention of recurrent stroke after an initial embolic stroke of undetermined source and was associated with a higher risk of bleeding. (Funded by Bayer and Janssen Research and Development; NAVIGATE ESUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02313909 .).

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

We investigated the impact of polyvascular disease in patients enrolled in ROCKET AF.. Cox regression models were used to assess clinical outcomes and treatment effects of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary, peripheral, or carotid artery disease, or any combination of the 3.. A total of 655 (4.6%) patients had polyvascular disease (≥2 disease locations), and 3,391 (23.8%) had single-arterial bed disease. Patients with polyvascular disease had similar rates of stroke/systemic embolism but higher rates of cardiovascular and bleeding events when compared with those without vascular disease. Use of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was associated with higher rates of stroke in patients with polyvascular disease (hazard ratio [HR] 2.41, 95% CI 1.05-5.54); however, this was not seen in patients with single-bed (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.64-1.28) or no vascular disease (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.69-1.04; interaction P = .058). There was a significant interaction for major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding in patients with polyvascular (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.91-1.65) and single-bed vascular disease (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13-1.49) treated with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin when compared with those without vascular disease (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.04; interaction P = .0006). Additional antiplatelet therapy in this population did not improve stroke or cardiovascular outcomes.. The use of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was associated with a higher risk of stroke and bleeding in patients with polyvascular disease enrolled in ROCKET AF. Further studies are needed to understand the optimal management of this high-risk population.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Vascular Diseases; Warfarin

Among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), rivaroxaban with background antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced the first occurrence of bleeding compared to triple therapy with warfarin. This study hypothesized that total bleeding events, including those beyond the first event, would be reduced with rivaroxaban-based regimens. In the PIONEER AF-PCI trial, 2099 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population were randomized to three groups and followed for 12 months: (1) rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily plus a P2Y. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01830543 (PIONEER AF-PCI).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Net clinical outcome analyses of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) mingle fatal or irreversible events with survivable or reversible events that vary significantly in clinical impact.. A comparison of efficacy and safety limited to fatal or irreversible ischemic and adverse or seriously harmful events is one way to assess net clinical outcome and risk-benefit overall, given the fact that these events have a similar clinical impact.. In the ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 (Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) trial of rivaroxaban in the secondary prevention of events among patients with ACS treated with aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticlopidine (clopidogrel/ticlopidine) or aspirin alone, fatal and irreversible efficacy events including nonbleeding cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke were compared to fatal or irreversible safety events, including fatal and intracranial bleeding.. Rivaroxaban, 2.5 mg orally twice per day, in patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel/ticlopidine was associated with 115 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18 to 212) fewer fatal or irreversible ischemic events (663 for placebo vs. 548 for therapy) and 10 (95% CI: -11 to 32) additional fatal or irreversible seriously harmful events (33 vs. 23 for placebo) per 10,000 patient-years of exposure. Taken together, there would be 105 (95% CI: 6 to 204) fatal or irreversible events prevented per 10,000 patient-years of exposure to rivaroxaban compared with placebo, with 11 (10 of 115) fatal or irreversible ischemic events prevented for each fatal or irreversible seriously harmful event caused. If only nonbleeding cardiovascular death is included as a fatal or irreversible event, then 95 events would be prevented per 10,000 patient-years of exposure in the group taking 2.5 mg orally twice per day.. Both fatal or irreversible ischemia and bleeding are clinically significant events that can be compared to assess the net clinical outcomes associated with therapy. Rivaroxaban therapy at an oral dose of 2.5 mg twice daily in patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel is associated with a net reduction in fatal or irreversible events. (Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51]; NCT00809965).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention

Venous thromboembolism (VTE)-BLEED, a decision tool for predicting major bleeding during chronic anticoagulation for VTE has not yet been validated in practice-based conditions. We calculated the prognostic indices of VTE-BLEED for major bleeding after day 30 and day 90, as well as for recurrent VTE and all-cause mortality, in 4457 patients enrolled in the international, prospective XALIA study. The median at-risk time was 190 days (interquartile range 106-360). The crude hazard ratio (HR) for major bleeding after day 30 was 2·6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·3-5·2] and the treatment-adjusted HR was 2·3 (95% CI 1·1-4·5) for VTE-BLEED high (versus low) risk patients: the corresponding values for major bleeding after day 90 were 3·8 (95% CI 1·6-9·3) and 3·2 (95% CI 1·3-7·7), respectively. The predictive value of VTE-BLEED was similar in selected patients with unprovoked VTE or those treated with rivaroxaban. High VTE-BLEED score was associated with higher incidence of all-cause mortality (treatment-adjusted HR 11, 95% CI 4·8-23), but not evidently with recurrent VTE (treatment-adjusted HR 1·5; 95% CI 0·85-2·7). These results confirm the predictive value of VTE-BLEED in practice-based data in patients treated with rivaroxaban or conventional anticoagulation, supporting the hypothesis that VTE-BLEED may be useful for making management decisions on the duration of anticoagulant therapy.

Topics: Adult; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Survival Rate; Venous Thromboembolism; Young Adult

Patients who are hospitalized for medical illness remain at risk for venous thromboembolism after discharge, but the role of extended thromboprophylaxis in the treatment of such patients is a subject of controversy.. In this randomized, double-blind trial, medically ill patients who were at increased risk for venous thromboembolism on the basis of a modified International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) score of 4 or higher (scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of venous thromboembolism) or a score of 2 or 3 plus a plasma d-dimer level of more than twice the upper limit of the normal range (defined according to local laboratory criteria) were assigned at hospital discharge to either once-daily rivaroxaban at a dose of 10 mg (with the dose adjusted for renal insufficiency) or placebo for 45 days. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolism or death due to venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding.. Of the 12,024 patients who underwent randomization, 12,019 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 50 of 6007 patients (0.83%) who were given rivaroxaban and in 66 of 6012 patients (1.10%) who were given placebo (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 1.09; P=0.14). The prespecified secondary outcome of symptomatic nonfatal venous thromboembolism occurred in 0.18% of patients in the rivaroxaban group and 0.42% of patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.89). Major bleeding occurred in 17 of 5982 patients (0.28%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 9 of 5980 patients (0.15%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.84 to 4.23).. Rivaroxaban, given to medical patients for 45 days after hospital discharge, was not associated with a significantly lower risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism and death due to venous thromboembolism than placebo. The incidence of major bleeding was low. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MARINER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02111564 .).

Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Discharge; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Although many patients with venous thromboembolism require extended treatment, it is uncertain whether it is better to use full- or lower-intensity anticoagulation therapy or aspirin.. In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, we assigned 3396 patients with venous thromboembolism to receive either once-daily rivaroxaban (at doses of 20 mg or 10 mg) or 100 mg of aspirin. All the study patients had completed 6 to 12 months of anticoagulation therapy and were in equipoise regarding the need for continued anticoagulation. Study drugs were administered for up to 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic recurrent fatal or nonfatal venous thromboembolism, and the principal safety outcome was major bleeding.. A total of 3365 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analyses (median treatment duration, 351 days). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 17 of 1107 patients (1.5%) receiving 20 mg of rivaroxaban and in 13 of 1127 patients (1.2%) receiving 10 mg of rivaroxaban, as compared with 50 of 1131 patients (4.4%) receiving aspirin (hazard ratio for 20 mg of rivaroxaban vs. aspirin, 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 0.59; hazard ratio for 10 mg of rivaroxaban vs. aspirin, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.47; P<0.001 for both comparisons). Rates of major bleeding were 0.5% in the group receiving 20 mg of rivaroxaban, 0.4% in the group receiving 10 mg of rivaroxaban, and 0.3% in the aspirin group; the rates of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were 2.7%, 2.0%, and 1.8%, respectively. The incidence of adverse events was similar in all three groups.. Among patients with venous thromboembolism in equipoise for continued anticoagulation, the risk of a recurrent event was significantly lower with rivaroxaban at either a treatment dose (20 mg) or a prophylactic dose (10 mg) than with aspirin, without a significant increase in bleeding rates. (Funded by Bayer Pharmaceuticals; EINSTEIN CHOICE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02064439 .).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aspirin; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Venous Thromboembolism

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, is the standard antithrombotic treatment following acute coronary syndromes. The factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban reduced mortality and ischaemic events when added to DAPT, but caused increased bleeding. The safety of a dual pathway antithrombotic therapy approach combining low-dose rivaroxaban (in place of aspirin) with a P2Y12 inhibitor has not been assesssed in acute coronary syndromes. We aimed to assess rivaroxaban 2·5 mg twice daily versus aspirin 100 mg daily, in addition to clopidogrel or ticagrelor (chosen at investigator discretion before randomisation), for patients with acute coronary syndromes started within 10 days after presentation and continued for 6-12 months.. In this double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial (GEMINI-ACS-1) done at 371 clinical centres in 21 countries, eligible patients were older than 18 years with unstable angina, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with positive cardiac biomarkers and either ischaemic electrocardiographic changes or an atherosclerotic culprit lesion identified during angiography. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) within 10 days after admission for the index acute coronary syndromes event to either aspirin or rivaroxaban based on a computer-generated randomisation schedule. Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks with size of four and was stratified based on the background P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) intended to be used at the time of randomisation. Investigators and patients were masked to treatment assignment. Patients received a minimum of 180 days of double-blind treatment with rivaroxaban 2·5 mg twice daily or aspirin 100 mg daily. The choice of clopidogrel or ticagrelor during trial conduct was not randomised and was based on investigator preference. The primary endpoint was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) clinically significant bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; major, minor, or requiring medical attention) up to day 390. Primary analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02293395.. Between April 22, 2015, and Oct 14, 2016, 3037 patients with acute coronary syndromes were randomly assigned; 1518 to receive aspirin and 1519 to receive rivaroxaban. 1704 patients (56%) were in the ticagrelor and 1333 (44%) in the clopidogrel strata. Median duration of treatment was 291 days (IQR 239-354). TIMI non-CABG clinically significant bleeding was similar with rivaroxaban versus aspirin therapy (total 154 patients [5%]; 80 participants [5%] of 1519 vs 74 participants [5%] of 1518; HR 1·09 [95% CI 0·80-1·50]; p=0·5840).. A dual pathway antithrombotic therapy approach combining low-dose rivaroxaban with a P2Y12 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes had similar risk of clinically significant bleeding as aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor. A larger, adequately powered trial would be required to definitively assess the efficacy and safety of this approach.. Janssen Research & Development and Bayer AG.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electrocardiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Rivaroxaban; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

XALIA assessed the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) treatment in routine clinical practice. This substudy describes the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 'early switchers' - patients who received heparin or fondaparinux for >2-14days and/or a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for 1-14days before switching to rivaroxaban.. Patients with DVT (latterly with concomitant pulmonary embolism) received rivaroxaban or standard anticoagulation (initial treatment with heparin or fondaparinux, usually overlapping with and followed by a VKA). Patients administered rivaroxaban alone, or heparin or fondaparinux for ≤48h pre-enrollment were included in the rivaroxaban cohort. Therapy type, dose, and duration were at the physician's discretion. Primary outcomes were major bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and all-cause mortality.. In 368 early switchers, recurrence or bleeding risk factors were more prevalent versus the rivaroxaban cohort, including creatinine clearance<50mL/min (6.5% vs. 3.9%), previous major bleeding (4.6% vs. 1.4%), active cancer (8.2% vs. 5.6%), and concomitant pulmonary embolism (20.9% vs. 8.4%). Crude incidence rates were numerically higher versus the rivaroxaban cohort for major bleeding (1.4% vs. 0.7%), recurrent VTE (2.2% vs. 1.4%), and all-cause mortality (0.8% vs. 0.5%).. Patients who switched to rivaroxaban early in the treatment process had a higher frequency of risk factors for bleeding and recurrent VTE than patients treated with rivaroxaban; reflected by the higher risk of adverse events in that group during follow-up.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polysaccharides; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

Until recently, standard treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) concerned a combination of short-term low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and long-term vitamin-K antagonist (VKA). Risk of bleeding and the requirement for regular anticoagulation monitoring are, however, limiting their use. Rivaroxaban is a novel oral anticoagulant associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeds (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.79) compared to LMWH/VKA therapy, and does not require regular anticoagulation monitoring.. To evaluate the health economic consequences of treating acute VTE patients with rivaroxaban compared to treatment with LMWH/VKA, viewed from the Dutch societal perspective.. A life-time Markov model was populated with the findings of the EINSTEIN phase III clinical trial to analyze cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban therapy in treatment and prevention of VTE from a Dutch societal perspective. Primary model outcomes were total and incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), as well as life expectancy and costs.. Over a patient's lifetime, rivaroxaban was shown to be dominant, with health gains of 0.047 QALYs and cost savings of €304 compared to LMWH/VKA therapy. Dominance was robustly present in all sensitivity analyses. Major drivers of the differences between the two treatment arms were related to anticoagulation monitoring (medical costs, travel costs, and loss of productivity) and the occurrence of major bleeds.. Rivaroxaban treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism results in health gains and cost savings compared to LMWH/VKA therapy. This conclusion holds for the Dutch setting, both for the societal perspective, as well as the healthcare perspective.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Health Resources; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Models, Econometric; Netherlands; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Venous Thromboembolism

The guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopedic surgeries have reached a consensus on the postoperative conventional anticoagulation. However, the choice of anticoagulant drugs is yet controversial. The use of the drug rivaroxaban is expensive. Since the compliance of patients with low-molecular-weight heparin is considerably low, a cost-effective, efficacious and convenient anticoagulant program is essential. The present study investigated the efficacy, safety, patient compliance, and cost-effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin with sequential Rivaroxaban anticoagulant therapy in patients with a hip fracture, following internal fixation. A total of 287 patients with hip fractures were randomized into three groups: Rivaroxaban alone, Enoxaparin alone, and Enoxaparin followed by Rivaroxaban. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative VTE, whereas the secondary endpoints were the compliance and treatment costs. Adverse reactions included bleeding and wound complications. The incidences of VTE were 5.21%, 14.74%, and 10.42% in the Rivaroxaban, low-molecular-weight heparin, and sequential therapy groups, respectively. The VTE-related mortality rates were 0%, 1.05%, and 1.04%. The average hospital stay was 12±8,15±7, and 11±5d, whereas the compliance rates of the three groups were 82.3%, 71.6%, and 88.5%, respectively. The incidences of adverse incisions were 14.6%, 4.2%, and 6.3% for the three groups examined. The effects and the incidence of postoperative bleeding in the treatment of low-molecular-weight heparin followed by Rivaroxaban did not differ significantly from that of Rivaroxaban alone. However, the postoperative drainage, the cost of treatment and the incidence of VTE reduced significantly, whereas the incidences of adverse incisions and the patient compliance were increased.. ChiCTR-INR-17010495.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Hemorrhage; Hip Fractures; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Anticoagulation, reducing the risk of thromboembolic events in patients undergoing cardioversion, is a cornerstone of peri-cardioversion management in patients with atrial fibrillation. We aimed to analyse published data on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients undergoing cardioversion. We performed a systematic review of randomized prospective clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with warfarin and reporting data on post-cardioversion outcomes of interest. Outcomes of interest were stroke, systemic thromboembolic events and major bleeding. We reviewed a total of six RCTs including 3900 cardioversions performed using a DOAC for thromboembolic prophylaxis. These studies reported a low incidence overall of adverse outcomes associated with the use of DOACs (around 1% in all studies, except the ROCKET post-hoc study which included ablation procedures). The incidence rate of adverse events during DOAC treatment was found to be very similar to that observed with warfarin anticoagulation. In RCTs DOAC treatment in patients undergoing cardioversion appears to be effective and safe. However, because evidence in this clinical setting is still weak, observational reports could be useful in providing further data about peri-procedural outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The effectiveness of preoperative thromboprophylaxis remains obscure in patients with femoral neck fracture. The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether these patients benefit from preoperative thromboprophylaxis.. In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, a total of 80 patients with femoral neck fracture were randomly assigned to receive either rivaroxaban or conservative treatment before surgery. For all patients, color Doppler ultrasound of both lower extremities was performed immediately after admission. The primary efficacy outcome was venous thromboembolism (VTE) defined as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding.. Compared with conservative treatment, rivaroxaban could significantly reduce the incidence of DVT from 19.5% (8/41) to 2.6% (1/39) (P = .016). Preoperatively, there were a total of 9 occurrences of DVT including 8 DVT in the conservative treatment group and 1 in the oral rivaroxaban group. All cases of DVT were asymptomatic, with 8 of them diagnosed as isolated muscular calf vein thromboses. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of the overall incidence of major bleeding.. Thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban prior to surgery can effectively reduce the risk of preoperative DVT for patients with femoral neck fracture without increasing the risk of bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Conservative Treatment; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Femoral Neck Fractures; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Preoperative Care; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color; Venous Thrombosis

We evaluated whether rivaroxaban alone or in combination with aspirin would be more effective than aspirin alone for secondary cardiovascular prevention.. In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 27,395 participants with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg once daily). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The study was stopped for superiority of the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group after a mean follow-up of 23 months.. The primary outcome occurred in fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group than in the aspirin-alone group (379 patients [4.1%] vs. 496 patients [5.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.86; P<0.001; z=-4.126), but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group (288 patients [3.1%] vs. 170 patients [1.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.40 to 2.05; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in intracranial or fatal bleeding between these two groups. There were 313 deaths (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group as compared with 378 (4.1%) in the aspirin-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.96; P=0.01; threshold P value for significance, 0.0025). The primary outcome did not occur in significantly fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group than in the aspirin-alone group, but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-alone group.. Among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, those assigned to rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin had better cardiovascular outcomes and more major bleeding events than those assigned to aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily) alone did not result in better cardiovascular outcomes than aspirin alone and resulted in more major bleeding events. (Funded by Bayer; COMPASS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01776424 .).

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication of cancer associated with morbidity, mortality, increased hospitalizations and higher health care costs. Cancer patients at increased risk for VTE can be identified using a validated risk assessment score, and the incidence of VTE can be reduced in high-risk settings using anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban is a potent, oral, direct, factor Xa inhibitor approved for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events, including VTE. CASSINI is a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre study comparing rivaroxaban with placebo in adult ambulatory patients with various cancers who are initiating systemic cancer therapy and are at high risk of VTE (Khorana score ≥ 2). Patients with primary brain tumours or those at risk for bleeding are excluded. Approximately 700 patients will be randomized 1:1 to rivaroxaban 10 mg daily or placebo for up to 6 months if there is no evidence of VTE from compression ultrasonography (CU) during screening or from routine care imaging within 30 days prior to randomization. Mandatory CU will also be performed at weeks 8 and 16 (±7 days), and at study end (±3 days). The primary efficacy hypothesis is that anticoagulation with rivaroxaban reduces the composite of objectively confirmed symptomatic or asymptomatic, lower-extremity, proximal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT); symptomatic, upper-extremity DVT; symptomatic or incidental pulmonary embolism; and VTE-related death compared with placebo. The primary safety objective is to assess major bleeding events (Clinical trial information: NCT02555878).

Topics: Ambulatory Care; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; North America; Pulmonary Embolism; Research Design; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Canada; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Therapy Management; Middle Aged; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Patient Readmission; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Background The perioperative management of patients who take a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for atrial fibrillation and require treatment interruption for an elective surgery/procedure is a common clinical scenario for which best practices are uncertain. The Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) study is designed to address this unmet clinical need. We discuss the rationale for the PAUSE design and analysis plan as well as the rationale supporting the perioperative DOAC protocol.\ \ Methods PAUSE is a prospective study with three parallel cohorts, one for each DOAC, to assess a standardized but patient-specific perioperative management protocol for DOAC-treated patients with atrial fibrillation. The perioperative protocol accounts for DOAC type, patient's renal function and surgery/procedure-related bleeding risk. The primary study aim is to demonstrate the safety of the PAUSE protocol for the perioperative management of each DOAC. The secondary aim is to determine the effect of the pre-procedure interruption on residual anticoagulation when measured by the dilute thrombin time for dabigatran and anti-factor Xa levels for rivaroxaban and apixaban. The study hypothesis is that the perioperative management protocol for each DOAC is safe for patient care, defined by expected risks for major bleeding of 1% (80% power to exclude 2%), and for arterial thromboembolism of 0.5% (80% power to exclude 1.5%) in each DOAC group.\ \ Conclusion The PAUSE study has the potential to establish a standard-of-care approach for the perioperative management of DOAC-treated patients. The PAUSE management protocol is designed to be easily applied in clinical practice, as it is standardized and also patient specific.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Canada; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Perioperative Period; Postoperative Complications; Precision Medicine; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

Multiple randomized controlled trials have documented the effectiveness of rivaroxaban in the prevention of venous thromboembolism up to 1-month following total joint arthroplasty. However, the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in the real-world setting, outside of the strict protocols used by randomized clinical trials, are unknown.. This was a prospective, observational, noninterventional, phase IV study of 3914 consecutive patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty from June 2010 to December 2012. Patients were treated with rivaroxaban 10 mg by mouth daily starting postoperative day 1 and continued for 15 days. Participants were followed up in clinic at 6 weeks and contacted by telephone at 12 weeks. The primary outcome of interest was symptomatic venous thromboembolism; secondary outcomes included bleeding events, transfusion requirements, and death.. The incidence of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis at 3 months was 0.5% (n = 18). Only 1 deep venous thrombosis event occurred within 7 days of surgery. The incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) at 3 months was 0.7% (n = 28). Thirteen PEs (46%) occurred within 7 days of surgery. The rate of major bleeding while on prophylaxis was 0.1%. Only 5% of patients received a blood transfusion. No deaths were attributed to thromboembolic events.. This prospective, observational, phase IV study demonstrates that rivaroxaban appears to protect patients against symptomatic PE and is not associated with major bleeding events when used in a real-world setting as described.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Blood Transfusion; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Young Adult

The results of the EINSTEIN-DVT/PE and AMPLIFY trials, which compared rivaroxaban and apixaban with conventional anticoagulation therapy for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), respectively, are often compared. However, the trials differed in duration of therapy (3-12 and 6months, respectively) and in patient selection (few exclusion criteria and more stringent exclusion criteria, respectively).. To determine the effect of these methodological differences on outcomes, the patients enrolled in EINSTEIN-DVT/PE were divided into 2 cohorts; the 5253 patients that matched the exclusion criteria for AMPLIFY and were treated for at least 6months (cohort 1) and the 2368 patients who would have been ineligible for AMPLIFY (cohort 2).. Compared with patients in cohort 2, those in cohort 1 were older and more often male and there were more with unprovoked VTE, prior VTE, cancer and known thrombophilia. In cohort 1, rivaroxaban would have significantly reduced recurrent VTE (relative risk [RR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.95) and major bleeding (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30-0.82) compared with conventional therapy, whereas the two treatments would have had similar effects on recurrent VTE (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.65-1.79) and major bleeding (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.48-2.18) in cohort 2.. This analysis illustrates the influence of patient selection and treatments duration on outcome results and highlights the limitations of cross-trial comparisons.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Anti-Xa activity (AXA) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and relationship to bleeding events remains unclear.. We evaluated AXA in 94 patients at both trough and peak rivaroxaban concentrations. Rivaroxaban dosage was determined according to creatinine clearance (CrCl): 10 and 15mg once daily for patients with CrCl 15-49 and CrCl ≥50mL/min, respectively. AXA value distribution and its association with bleeding events were examined in enrolled subjects.. The mean peak AXA level was significantly higher than the mean trough level (1.98±0.81 vs. 0.16±0.15IU/mL; p<0.001). The peak AXA level significantly differed among patients with CrCl 15-29, 30-49, 50-79, and ≥80mL/min (2.51±0.83, 1.72±0.76, 2.05±0.82, and 1.66±0.51IU/mL, respectively; p=0.004). Major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding events occurred in 22 patients (23.4% and 14.6% per year, respectively). The mean peak AXA level was significantly higher in patients who experienced bleeding events than in those who did not (2.40±0.70 vs. 1.84±0.80IU/mL; p=0.001). A Cox multivariate analysis showed that the peak AXA level was independently related to the incidence of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding events (p=0.012). Cumulative bleeding rates were significantly higher in patients with high peak AXA levels (p<0.001).. Peak AXA level was an independent predictor for bleeding events in Japanese NVAF patients receiving rivaroxaban.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban

BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess whether the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) would be altered when rivaroxaban or enoxaparin was used for thromboprophylaxis in primary total knee replacement (TKR). It was hypothesized that the hemostatic effect of TXA would be better with the use of enoxaparin. MATERIAL AND METHODS A randomized clinical trial was conducted on 194 patients undergoing primary TKR for osteoarthritis. An intravenous dose of 15 mg/kg (TXA) and 1 g topical TXA were used. Patients randomly received enoxaparin or rivaroxaban prophylaxis when the drainage was less than 30 ml/h 6-8 h postoperatively. The primary endpoint was hidden blood loss (HBL). Indexes of total blood loss drainage, hemoglobin drop, transfusion, range of motion (ROM), HSS score, VAS pain score, knee swelling, length of hospital stay (LOHS), incidence of venous thromboembolism, major/minor bleeding, and wound complications were also compared between the groups. RESULTS More than 80% of patients initiated anticoagulation within 6 h postoperatively. No statistically significance difference was detected in terms of HBL (679.0±205.6 vs. 770.5±206.1, p=.062) or other bleeding index, ROM, or LOHS. The motion VAS pain score and knee swelling (16.7% vs. 6.1%, p=.021) were significantly lower, and HSS score at discharge was higher in the enoxaparin group. The rivaroxaban group had less asymptomatic deep venous (4.1% vs. 0%, p=.121) and muscular venous thrombosis (2.1% vs. 9.2%, p=.033); more ecchymosis (13.5% vs. 10.2%, p=.472), and wound complications (13.5% vs. 6.1%, p=.082). No episodes of transfusion, pulmonary embolism, or major bleeding occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS More attention should be paid to the increased risk of wound complications and knee swelling associated with rivaroxaban, although the hidden blood loss was similar in both groups.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Blood Coagulation; Drug Interactions; Enoxaparin; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis; Pilot Projects; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Tranexamic Acid; Venous Thromboembolism

Superficial-vein thrombosis can lead to deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, might simplify treatment compared with fondaparinux because it does not require daily subcutaneous injection and is cheaper. We compared efficacy outcomes in patients with superficial-vein thrombosis and additional risk factors given either rivaroxaban or fondaparinux to assess whether rivaroxaban is non-inferior to fondaparinux in the prevention of thromboembolic complications.. In this open-label, masked endpoint, randomised, non-inferiority phase 3b trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with symptomatic superficial-vein thrombosis from 27 sites (academic, community hospitals, and specialist practices) in Germany. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive 10 mg oral rivaroxaban or 2·5 mg subcutaneous fondaparinux once a day for 45 days. Patients were eligible if they had symptomatic thrombosis (at least 5 cm in a supragenual superficial-vein segment) and at least one additional risk factor (older than 65 years, male sex, previous venous thromboembolism, cancer, autoimmune disease, thrombosis of non-varicose veins). Main exclusion criteria were: symptoms for longer than 3 weeks, thrombus within 3 cm of the sapheno-femoral junction, indication for full-dose anticoagulation therapy, and substantial hepatic or renal impairment. Randomisation was done with a central block randomisation process. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, progression or recurrence of superficial vein-thrombosis, and all-cause mortality at 45 days in the per-protocol population (all randomly assigned patients without major protocol violations). We used a non-inferiority margin of 4·5% (absolute difference between rivaroxaban and fondaparinux). The main safety outcome was major bleeding. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01499953.. Between April 25, 2012, and Feb 18, 2016, 485 patients were enrolled in the study and 472 were randomly assigned to the rivaroxaban group (n=236) or the fondaparinux group (n=236). In the 435 patients included in the per-protocol analysis set, the primary efficacy outcome occurred in seven (3%) of 211 patients (95% CI 1·6-6·7) in the rivaroxaban group and in four (2%) of 224 patients (0·7-4·5) in the fondaparinux group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·9, 95% CI 0·6-6·4; p=0·0025 for non-inferiority) at day 45. There were no major bleeds in either group. There was one death in the rivaroxaban group; this patient died from cardiogenic shock on day 50 after a type A aortic dissection, not related to treatment.. Rivaroxaban was non-inferior to fondaparinux for treatment of superficial-vein thrombosis in terms of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, progression or recurrence of superficial vein-thrombosis, and all-cause mortality, and was not associated with more major bleeding. Therefore, rivaroxaban could offer patients with symptomatic superficial-vein thrombosis a less burdensome and less expensive oral treatment option instead of a more expensive subcutaneous injection.. GWT-TUD and Bayer Vital.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polysaccharides; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thrombosis

Acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is traditionally managed with a short course of parenteral anticoagulation followed by 3-6 months of a vitamin-K antagonist. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) do not require routine monitoring and dose adjustment, thus potentially provide an alternative treatment option.. Because of the lack of head-to-head clinical studies, an indirect comparison was conducted of dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban based on the respective phase III clinical trial. The derived relative safety and efficacy estimates were used to evaluate the cost-utility of dabigatran compared with rivaroxaban in the treatment and secondary prevention of VTE. The results of the indirect comparison showed no significant difference between dabigatran and rivaroxaban in avoiding recurrent VTE following index PE, index DVT, or DVT/PE combined, in treatment and extended anticoagulation. Dabigatran has significantly less major or clinically relevant bleeds (MCRBE) compared to rivaroxaban in treatment after index DVT and treatment after DVT or PE combined, but was not significantly different from rivaroxaban after index PE or in extended anticoagulation. In cost-utility deterministic analyses, dabigatran was projected dominant in all analyzed settings, given its marginally lower total cost and marginally higher QALYs gained compared to rivaroxaban. Probabilistic analyses results showed a high likelihood of dabigatran being considered good value for money in the UK, in treatment and in secondary prevention of VTE.. The cost-effectiveness evaluations showed that dabigatran can be considered the dominant treatment strategy compared to rivaroxaban in the patients' sub-groups considered, given the projected marginally higher clinical benefits and lower treatment costs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Double-Blind Method; Female; Health Services; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Econometric; Pulmonary Embolism; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants may simplify long-term therapy in conditions requiring anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been extensively studied and is now approved for the prevention and therapy of a number of thromboembolic conditions.. This is a multicentre, randomized, open-label, study that will evaluate if Rivaroxaban 20 mg od (or 15 mg od in patients with moderate renal insufficiency) is non-inferior to warfarin (INR target 2.5), for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding and death in high risk (triple positive) patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Secondary endpoints will assess the incidence of any individual component of the composite end point. An external adjudication committee will evaluate all suspected outcome events. This will be a unique trial, as it will enrol the biggest homogenous cohort of high risk APS individuals.. The methods and the study design should be appropriate to achieve study results that are both scientifically valid and relevant to clinical practice.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Protocols; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin; Young Adult

The study aim was to identify predictive factors for major bleeding in patients receiving the novel oral factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban or enoxaparin-vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the treatment of acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism. We analysed data from patients included in the phase III EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies. Factors associated with major bleeding events were assessed with best subset variable selection using Cox proportional hazards regression model. Three time windows were considered, i.e. the initial three weeks, after the third week onwards, and the entire duration of the anticoagulant treatment. Model discrimination was estimated using the C-statistic and validated internally by bootstrap techniques. Major bleeding occurred in 40 (1.0%) of 4130 patients receiving rivaroxaban and in 72 (1.7%) of 4116 receiving enoxaparin/VKAs, with 44% of the major bleeding events occurring in the first three weeks of treatment. Significant risk factors for major bleeding were older age, black race, low haemoglobin concentrations, active cancer, and antiplatelet or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy. The discrimination of the model for major bleeding was high for the first three weeks (C-statistic 0.73), from the fourth week onwards (C-statistic 0.68), and the entire period of anticoagulant treatment (C-statistic 0.74). This analysis identified risk factors for major bleeding in patients receiving the novel oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban or enoxaparin/VKAs for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. The prognostic model based on the combination of identified risk factors may be informative to estimate the risk of major bleeding both during the initial and later phases of anticoagulation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Black or African American; Blood Coagulation; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemoglobins; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Regression Analysis; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

The aim of the present study was to analyse concomitant drug use and its association with outcome in patients (N = 17 701) receiving rivaroxaban or standard of care (SOC) for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopaedic surgery in the non-interventional, phase IV XAMOS (Xarelto® in the prophylaxis of post-surgical venous thromboembolism after elective major orthopaedic surgery of hip or knee) study.. Concomitant drug use was at the discretion of the treating physician. Prespecified co-medications of interest were cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors/inducers, platelet aggregation inhibitors (PAIs) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Crude event incidences were compared between rivaroxaban and SOC groups.. CYP3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitor/inducer use was infrequent, in contrast to PAI (~7%) and NSAID (~52%) use. Rivaroxaban was associated with a lower incidence of overall symptomatic thromboembolic events compared with SOC, regardless of co-medication use. In both treatment groups, PAI users, with higher age and prevalence of cardiovascular co-morbidities, had similar higher (>7-fold) incidences of symptomatic arterial but not venous thromboembolic events compared with non-users. NSAID use had no influence on thromboembolic events. However, odds ratios (ORs) for major bleeding events (European Medicines Agency definition) were higher in NSAID users compared with non-users in rivaroxaban [OR = 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06, 2.13] and SOC (OR = 1.70; CI 1.16, 2.49) groups. In PAI users, ORs for major bleeding events were no different from those of non-users in both the rivaroxaban (OR = 1.49; CI 0.84, 2.65) and SOC (OR = 1.46; CI 0.82, 2.62) groups.. Use of NSAIDs in XAMOS was frequent and associated with a higher frequency of bleeding events in patients receiving rivaroxaban or SOC, although the benefit-risk profile of rivaroxaban compared with SOC was maintained.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Cohort Studies; Drug Interactions; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often take multiple medications.. We examined characteristics and compared adjusted outcomes between rivaroxaban and warfarin according to number of concomitant baseline medications and the presence of combined cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) study. At baseline, 5101 patients (36%) were on 0 to 4 medications, 7298 (51%) were on 5 to 9, and 1865 (13%) were on ≥ 10. Although polypharmacy was not associated with higher risk of stroke or non-central nervous system embolism (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02 for ≥ 10 versus 0-4 medications; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.38), it was associated with higher risks of the combined end point of stroke, non-central nervous system embolism, vascular death, or myocardial infarction (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.41 for ≥ 10 versus 0-4 medications; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.68) and nonmajor clinically relevant or major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.47 for ≥ 10 versus 0-4 medications; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.65). There was no significant difference in primary efficacy (adjusted interaction P=0.99) or safety outcomes (adjusted interaction P=0.87) between treatment groups by number of medications. Patients treated with 0 to 4 medications had lower rates of major bleeding with rivaroxaban (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.95; interaction P=0.0074). There was no evidence of differential outcomes in those treated with ≥ 1 combined cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors.. In a population of patients with atrial fibrillation, two thirds were on ≥ 5 medications. Increasing medication use was associated with higher risk of bleeding but not stroke. Rivaroxaban was tolerated across complex patients on multiple medications.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polypharmacy; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This prospective study was conducted to report the effect of oral factor Xa inhibitor and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) on surgical complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The patients with an age < 60 years were randomly assigned to three groups (rivaroxaban, enoxaparin, and placebo) and the patients with an age ≥ 60 years were assigned to two groups (rivaroxaban and enoxaparin). All drug regimens started at 12 hours postoperatively and continued for two weeks after surgery. Primary measure outcome was major surgical wound complications defined as haematoma requiring any intervention, superficial wound infection, deep periprosthetic infection, and increased wound bleeding. Secondary measured outcome included minor surgical complications (swelling, drainage, erythema, and oozing), organ bleeding, and venous thromboembolic (VTE) events. A total of 184 patients aged < 60 years and 167 patients aged ≥ 60 years were included as the analysis population per group. Up to 14 days after surgery, the overall incidence of major surgical complications associated with thromboprophylaxis was 6.5 % (58/886). There were no significant differences in the rate of major surgical complications among all the three groups of the patients aged < 60 years and between two groups of the patients aged ≥ 60 years. For the patients aged < 60 years, wound oozing continued significantly longer in the pharmacological group than in the placebo group, but wound infection did not occur in any case. The VTE events were similar in all the groups.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Period; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Wound Healing

Hospital-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of premature death and disability worldwide. Evidence-based guidelines recommend that anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis be given to hospitalised medical patients at risk of VTE, but suggest against routine use of thromboprophylaxis beyond the hospital stay. The MARINER study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis using rivaroxaban, begun at hospital discharge and continued for 45 days, for preventing symptomatic VTE in high-risk medical patients. Eligible patients are identified using the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE VTE) risk score, combined with a laboratory test, D-dimer. The rivaroxaban regimen is 10 mg once daily for patients with CrCl ≥ 50 ml/min, or 7.5 mg once daily for patients with CrCl ≥ 30 ml/min and < 50 ml/min. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of symptomatic VTE (lower extremity deep-vein thrombosis and non-fatal pulmonary embolism) and VTE-related death. The principal safety outcome is major bleeding. A blinded clinical events committee adjudicates all suspected outcome events. The sample size is event-driven with an estimated total of 8,000 patients to acquire 161 primary outcome events. Study design features that distinguish MARINER from previous and ongoing thromboprophylaxis trials in medically ill patients are: (i) use of a validated risk assessment model (IMPROVE VTE) and D-dimer determination for identifying eligible patients at high risk of VTE, (ii) randomisation at the time of hospital discharge, (iii) a 45-day treatment period and (iv) restriction of the primary efficacy outcome to symptomatic VTE events.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Discharge; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Venous Thromboembolism

Patients who require perioperative anticoagulation during cardiac implantable electronic device surgery are at increased risk for bleeding complications. The BRUISE CONTROL trial demonstrated that continuing warfarin was safer than heparin bridging, reducing the incidence of clinically significant pocket hematoma. Novel oral anticoagulants are being increasingly prescribed in place of warfarin. The best perioperative management of these new anticoagulants is unknown.. A randomized controlled trial to investigate whether a strategy of continued vs interrupted novel oral anticoagulant (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) at the time of device surgery, in patients with moderate to high risk of arterial thromboembolic events, reduces the incidence of clinically significant hematoma (defined as a hematoma requiring reoperation and/or resulting in prolongation of hospitalization, and/or requiring interruption of anticoagulation). The secondary outcomes include components of the primary outcome, composite of all other major perioperative bleeding events, thromboembolic events, all-cause mortality, cost-effectiveness, patient quality of life, perioperative pain, and satisfaction. Planned analyses include descriptive statistics of all baseline variables. For the primary outcome, interrupted vs continued novel oral anticoagulant arms will be compared using the χ(2) test. If any clinically significant differences are identified, a logistic regression analysis will be conducted. Quality of life will be assessed using EuroQol-5D, and perioperative pain using a visual analog scale.. BRUISE CONTROL-2 is a randomized trial evaluating the best strategy to manage novel oral anticoagulants at the time of device surgery. We hypothesize that device surgery can be performed safely without interruption of these medications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Canada; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Defibrillators, Implantable; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Pacemaker, Artificial; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Preoperative Care; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Survival Rate; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The high costs associated with treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) are primarily due to hospital care, but there are limited data to understand the reasons for and predictors of hospitalization in patients with AF.. The ROCKET AF trial compared rivaroxaban with warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in AF. We described the frequency of and reasons for hospitalization during study follow-up and utilized Cox proportional hazards models to assess for baseline characteristics associated with all-cause hospitalization. Of 14 171 patients, 14% were hospitalized at least once. Of 2614 total hospitalizations, 41% were cardiovascular including 4% for AF; of the remaining, 12% were for bleeding. Compared with patients not hospitalized, hospitalized patients were older (74 vs. 72 years), and more frequently had diabetes (46 vs. 39%), prior MI (23 vs. 16%), and paroxysmal AF (19 vs. 17%), but less frequently had prior transient ischaemic attack/stroke (49 vs. 56%). After multivariable adjustment, lung disease [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-1.66], diabetes [1.22, (1.11-1.34)], prior MI [1.27, (1.13-1.42)], and renal dysfunction [HR 1.07 per 5 unit GFR < 65 mL/min, (1.04-1.10)] were associated with increased hospitalization risk. Treatment assignment was not associated with differential rates of hospitalization.. Nearly 1 in 7 of the moderate-to-high-risk patients with AF enrolled in this trial was hospitalized within 2 years, and both AF and bleeding were rare causes of hospitalization. Further research is needed to determine whether care pathways directed at comorbid conditions among AF patients could reduce the need for and costs associated with hospitalization.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Geography; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; International Cooperation; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Real-world data on the use of rivaroxaban in the perioperative period in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery are limited. Subsets of data from the Phase IV, non-interventional XAMOS study were analyzed to explore the potential influence of timing of the first thrombo prophylactic dose, type of anesthesia, and concomitant mechanical prophylaxis on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery in routine clinical practice.. In XAMOS, 8,778 patients received rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) and 8,635 received standard-of-care (SOC) pharmacological prophylaxis (safety population). Crude incidences of symptomatic thromboembolic and treatment-emergent bleeding events were analyzed according to timing of the first postoperative thromboprophylactic dose, use of general or neuraxial anesthesia, and use of mechanical prophylaxis with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.. In the rivaroxaban group, the incidences of symptomatic thromboembolic events were 0.7%, 1.0%, and 0.7% in patients receiving the first thromboprophylactic dose at ≤6 hours, >6 hours to ≤10 hours, and >10 hours to ≤24 hours after surgery, respectively. In the SOC group, the incidence of symptomatic thromboembolic events was slightly higher when the postoperative dose was given at >10 hours to ≤24 hours (1.8% vs 1.1% at ≤6 hours and 1.3% at >6 hours to ≤10 hours). The antithrombotic effect of rivaroxaban was maintained in comparison to the SOC group. The incidence of major bleeding (RECORD trial definition) was low and similar between the two treatment groups and was not influenced by timing of the first thromboprophylactic dose. Neuraxial anesthesia was used more than any other form of anesthesia for both hip and knee surgery; the effectiveness of rivaroxaban was not influenced by the type of anesthesia used. No spinal hematomas were reported in patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia in either treatment group. Use of mechanical thromboprophylaxis in addition to rivaroxaban or SOC pharmacological prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of thromboembolic events further.. The effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery in routine clinical practice were maintained irrespective of timing of the first postoperative dose within 24 hours after surgery, the type of anesthesia, and the additional use of mechanical thromboprophylaxis.

Topics: Anesthesia, Conduction; Anesthesia, General; Blood Coagulation; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Orthopedic Procedures; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Despite rapid clinical adoption of novel anticoagulants, it is unknown whether outcomes differ among patients with worsening renal function (WRF) taking these new drugs compared with warfarin. We aimed to determine whether the primary efficacy (stroke or systemic embolism) and safety (major bleeding and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding) end points from the ROCKET AF trial (Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation trial) differed among participants with WRF taking rivaroxaban and those taking warfarin.. After excluding patients without at least 1 follow-up creatinine measurement (n=1624), we included all remaining patients (n=12 612) randomly assigned to either rivaroxaban or dose-adjusted warfarin. On-treatment WRF (a decrease of >20% from screening creatinine clearance measurement at any time point during the study) was evaluated as a time-dependent covariate in Cox proportional hazards models.. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between patients with stable renal function (n=9292) and WRF (n=3320). Rates of stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, and bleeding were also similar, but WRF patients experienced a higher incidence of vascular death versus stable renal function (2.21 versus 1.41 events per 100 patient-years; P=0.026). WRF patients who were randomized to receive rivaroxaban had a reduction in stroke or systemic embolism compared with those taking warfarin (1.54 versus 3.25 events per 100 patient-years) that was not seen in patients with stable renal function who were randomized to receive rivaroxaban (P=0.050 for interaction). There was no difference in major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding among WRF patients randomized to warfarin versus rivaroxaban.. Among patients with on-treatment WRF, rivaroxaban was associated with lower rates of stroke and systemic embolism compared with warfarin, without an increase in the composite bleeding end point.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombophilia; Warfarin

During atrial fibrillation ablation, heparin is required and is guided by the activated clotting time (ACT). Differences in the ACT before ablation and adequate initial heparin dosing in patients receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were examined.. Patients who received warfarin (control, N = 90), dabigatran etexilate (N = 90), rivaroxaban (N = 90) and apixaban (N = 90) were studied. A 100 U/kg dose of heparin was administered as a reliable control dose for warfarin, and the remaining patients were randomly administered 110, 120 or 130 U/kg of heparin in each NOAC group, followed by a continuous heparin infusion.. Periprocedural thromboembolic and major bleeding were not observed. Minor bleeding occurred rarely without significant differences among the groups examined. Baseline ACTs were longer in the warfarin (152 ± 16 s) and dabigatran (153 ± 13 s) groups than in the rivaroxaban (134 ± 13 s) and apixaban (133 ± 20 s) groups. The initial bolus heparin dosages required to produce an ACT 15 min after the initial bolus that was identical to the control (333 ± 32 s) were 120 U/kg (318 ± 29 s) and 130 U/kg (339 ± 43 s) for dabigatran, 130 U/kg (314 ± 31 s) for rivaroxaban and 130 U/kg (317 ± 39 s) for apixaban. The NOAC groups required significantly larger doses of total heparin than the warfarin group.. The baseline ACTs differed among the three NOAC groups. The results of the comparison with warfarin (the control) indicated that dosages of 120 or 130 U/kg for dabigatran, and 130 U/kg for rivaroxaban and apixaban, were adequate initial heparin dosages.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Traditionally, patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) are admitted from the emergency department and treated with low-molecular-weight heparin followed by warfarin. Several studies now demonstrate that it is possible to identify low-risk PE patients that can safely be treated as outpatients. The advent of the direct-acting oral anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban has made it easier than ever to manage patients outside of the hospital. This article describes the design of a randomized controlled trial aimed at testing the hypothesis that low-risk PE patients can be safely and effectively managed at home using rivaroxaban, resulting in fewer days of hospitalization than standard-of-care treatment.. We have initiated a multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial in which low-risk adult PE patients (identified by the Hestia criteria) are randomized to outpatient management with oral rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily for 21 days followed by 20 mg once daily for 90 days versus standard care, determined by the treating physician and based on local practices. The primary clinical endpoint will be the total number of inpatient hospital days (including the index admission) for venous thromboembolic or bleeding-related events during the first 30 days after randomization. A total of 150 subjects per group will provide 82% power to detect a difference of 1 day or greater in the primary outcome.. Patient enrollment is ongoing at present in 45 of 60 planned sites. No interim analysis is planned and the study is being monitored by a data safety management board.. The MERCURY PE study is designed to test the hypothesis that outpatient management of low-risk PE patients with rivaroxaban reduces the number of hospitalization days from venous thromboembolism and bleeding compared with standard care. This article describes the rationale and methodology for this study.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The authors assessed the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation).. The frequency, patterns, and outcomes when adding DAPT to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in the setting of PCI in patients with AF are largely unknown.. The study population included all patients in the treatment group of the ROCKET AF trial divided by the receipt of PCI during follow-up. Clinical characteristics, PCI frequency, and rates of DAPT were reported. Clinical outcomes were adjudicated independently as part of the trial.. Among 14,171 patients, 153 (1.1%) underwent PCI during a median 806 days of follow-up. Patients treated with rivaroxaban were significantly less likely to undergo PCI compared with warfarin-treated patients (61 vs. 92; p = 0.01). Study drug was continued during PCI in 81% of patients. Long-term DAPT (≥30 days) was used in 37% and single antiplatelet therapy in 34%. A small number switched from DAPT to monotherapy within 30 days of PCI (n = 19 [12.3%]) and 15% of patients received no antiplatelet therapy after PCI. Rates of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding events were high in post-PCI patients (4.5/100 patient-years and 10.2/100 patient-years) in both treatment groups.. In patients with AF at moderate to high risk for stroke, PCI occurred in <1% per year. DAPT was used in a variable manner, with the majority of patients remaining on study drug after PCI. Rates of both thrombotic and bleeding events were high after PCI, highlighting the need for studies to determine the optimal antithrombotic therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is a recombinant modified human factor Xa decoy protein that has been shown to reverse the inhibition of factor Xa in healthy volunteers.. In this multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-group study, we evaluated 67 patients who had acute major bleeding within 18 hours after the administration of a factor Xa inhibitor. The patients all received a bolus of andexanet followed by a 2-hour infusion of the drug. Patients were evaluated for changes in measures of anti-factor Xa activity and were assessed for clinical hemostatic efficacy during a 12-hour period. All the patients were subsequently followed for 30 days. The efficacy population of 47 patients had a baseline value for anti-factor Xa activity of at least 75 ng per milliliter (or ≥0.5 IU per milliliter for those receiving enoxaparin) and had confirmed bleeding severity at adjudication.. The mean age of the patients was 77 years; most of the patients had substantial cardiovascular disease. Bleeding was predominantly gastrointestinal or intracranial. The mean (±SD) time from emergency department presentation to the administration of the andexanet bolus was 4.8±1.8 hours. After the bolus administration, the median anti-factor Xa activity decreased by 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58 to 94) from baseline among patients receiving rivaroxaban and by 93% (95% CI, 87 to 94) among patients receiving apixaban. These levels remained similar during the 2-hour infusion. Four hours after the end of the infusion, there was a relative decrease from baseline of 39% in the measure of anti-factor Xa activity among patients receiving rivaroxaban and of 30% among those receiving apixaban. Twelve hours after the andexanet infusion, clinical hemostasis was adjudicated as excellent or good in 37 of 47 patients in the efficacy analysis (79%; 95% CI, 64 to 89). Thrombotic events occurred in 12 of 67 patients (18%) during the 30-day follow-up.. On the basis of a descriptive preliminary analysis, an initial bolus and subsequent 2-hour infusion of andexanet substantially reduced anti-factor Xa activity in patients with acute major bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitors, with effective hemostasis occurring in 79%. (Funded by Portola Pharmaceuticals; ANNEXA-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02329327 .).

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Diseases; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

In patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with placement of stents, standard anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with a P2Y. We randomly assigned 2124 participants with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who had undergone PCI with stenting to receive, in a 1:1:1 ratio, low-dose rivaroxaban (15 mg once daily) plus a P2Y. The rates of clinically significant bleeding were lower in the two groups receiving rivaroxaban than in the group receiving standard therapy (16.8% in group 1, 18.0% in group 2, and 26.7% in group 3; hazard ratio for group 1 vs. group 3, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.76; P<0.001; hazard ratio for group 2 vs. group 3, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.80; P<0.001). The rates of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke were similar in the three groups (Kaplan-Meier estimates, 6.5% in group 1, 5.6% in group 2, and 6.0% in group 3; P values for all comparisons were nonsignificant).. In participants with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI with placement of stents, the administration of either low-dose rivaroxaban plus a P2Y

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Confidence Intervals; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Vitamin K

In the EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies, the majority of patients received heparins to bridge the period during venous thromboembolism (VTE) diagnosis confirmation and the start of the study. In contrast to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), rivaroxaban may not require initial heparin treatment.. To evaluate the effect of prestudy heparin on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban relative to enoxaparin/VKA, the 3-month incidence of recurrent VTE, and the 14-day incidence of major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding were compared in patients who did and did not receive prestudy heparin.. Of the 8,281 patients randomized, 6,937 (83.8%) received prestudy heparin (mean ± SD duration = rivaroxaban: 1.04 [± 0.74] days; enoxaparin 1.03 [± 0.42] days), and 1,344 (16.2%) did not. In patients who did not receive prestudy heparin, the incidences of recurrent VTE were similar in rivaroxaban (15 of 649, 2.3%) and enoxaparin/VKA (13 of 695, 1.9%) patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52 to 2.37). The incidences of recurrent VTE were also similar in rivaroxaban (54 of 3,501, 1.5%) and enoxaparin/VKA (69 of 3,436, 2.0%) patients who did receive prestudy heparin (adjusted HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.52 to 1.06; pinteraction  = 0.32). The incidences of major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding with rivaroxaban were not significantly different from those with enoxaparin/VKA, either with (105 of 3,485, 3.0% vs. 104 of 3,428, 3.0%; adjusted HR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.75 to 1.29) or without (24 of 645, 3.7% vs. 30 of 688, 4.4%; adjusted HR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.40; pinteraction  = 0.68) prestudy heparin.. Although the majority of patients in the EINSTEIN studies received prestudy heparin, there were no notable differences in treatment effect of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin/VKA in those who did and did not receive it.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Safety; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

The objective was to assess adverse outcomes in relation to the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score in patients treated with rivaroxaban or standard therapy in the phase III EINSTEIN PE study and to evaluate the utility of the simplified PESI score to identify low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients.. A post hoc analysis of EINSTEIN PE data was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with a range of simplified PESI scores. Recurrent venous thromboembolism, fatal PE, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding were stratified by simplified PESI scores of 0, 1, or ≥2 and according to treatment period at 7, 14, 30, and 90 days and at the end of the full intended treatment period.. Simplified PESI scores could be calculated in 4,831 of the 4,832 randomized patients; of those, 53.6, 36.7, and 9.7% had PESI scores of 0, 1, and ≥2, respectively. Among patients with simplified PESI scores of 0 or 1, fatal PE, all-cause mortality, and other adverse outcomes were uncommon within the first 7, 14, and 30 days. Patients with simplified PESI scores of ≥2 had more frequent adverse outcomes. Major bleeding was lower in the rivaroxaban group, particularly in those with simplified PESI scores of 1 or ≥2.. The findings support using risk stratification with the simplified PESI score to identify low-risk patients with PE.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Comorbidity; Emergency Service, Hospital; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Thiophenes

Use of vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in dialysis patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is controversial. However, no good alternatives presently are available. The anti-factor Xa antagonist rivaroxaban is contraindicated for lack of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical data. This study aims to characterize the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in maintenance hemodialysis patients.. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study.. 18 maintenance hemodialysis patients without residual kidney function at 2 centers. DRUG ADMINISTRATION, OUTCOMES, & MEASUREMENTS: (1) A single dose of 10mg of rivaroxaban was administered at the end of each of 3 consecutive dialysis sessions and area under the curve (AUC) and the effect on coagulation parameters were measured for 44 hours thereafter. (2) A single dose of 10mg of rivaroxaban was given 6 to 8 hours before a dialysis session and the effect of dialysis on rivaroxaban concentrations was evaluated. (3) To assess potential accumulation, 10mg of rivaroxaban was given once daily and AUC was measured during 24 hours on days 1 and 7.. Mean AUC0-44 of rivaroxaban plasma concentrations after a single dose of 10mg was 2,072μg/L/h, mean maximum concentration was 172.6μg/L, and mean terminal elimination half-life was 8.6 hours. Dialysis had no appreciable effect on rivaroxaban plasma concentrations. Mean trough concentration after multiple daily doses of 10mg was 20.2μg/L.. Higher rivaroxaban doses and patients with substantial residual kidney function were not studied.. A 10-mg dose of rivaroxaban in hemodialysis patients without residual kidney function results in drug exposure similar as published for 20mg in healthy volunteers. Rivaroxaban is not eliminated by dialysis. There is no accumulation after multiple daily dosing. The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in hemodialysis patients should be the subject of a large randomized trial.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Area Under Curve; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Half-Life; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Morpholines; Renal Dialysis; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Thrombophilia

Patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at high risk for recurrence. Although rivaroxaban is effective for extended VTE treatment at a dose of 20 mg once daily, use of the 10 mg dose may further improve its benefit-to-risk ratio. Low-dose aspirin also reduces rates of recurrent VTE, but has not been compared with anticoagulant therapy. The EINSTEIN CHOICE study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, event-driven study comparing the efficacy and safety of two once daily doses of rivaroxaban (20 and 10 mg) with aspirin (100 mg daily) for the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients who completed 6-12 months of anticoagulant therapy for their index acute VTE event. All treatments will be given for 12 months. The primary efficacy objective is to determine whether both doses of rivaroxaban are superior to aspirin for the prevention of symptomatic recurrent VTE, while the principal safety outcome is the incidence of major bleeding. The trial is anticipated to enrol 2,850 patients from 230 sites in 31 countries over a period of 27 months. In conclusion, the EINSTEIN CHOICE study will provide new insights into the optimal antithrombotic strategy for extended VTE treatment by comparing two doses of rivaroxaban with aspirin (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02064439).

Topics: Aspirin; Clinical Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Recurrence; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with concomitant coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still controversial, and the role of novel antithrombotic agents has nerve been tested. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate and overall safety and efficacy profile of the combination of rivaroxaban and ticagrelor in this particular population.. The RT-AF study is an open-label, randomized, active-controlled, multicenter clinical trial with up to 420 subjects enrolled in 5 centers. Eligible patients, who have a history or new onset paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent non-valvular AF, referred to the study centers with indications for PCI will be randomly assigned to receive triple therapy (including warfarin, clopidogrel and aspirin) or dual therapy (rivaroxaban and ticagrelor). All subjects will have clinical follow-up at discharge, at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months. The primary end point is major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events at 12 months. The major secondary end point is the composite efficacy outcome of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and ischemic stroke.. The study will be sufficiently powered to provide data primarily regarding the safety of dual therapy with rivaroxaban and ticagrelor over the traditional triple therapy in patients with AF undergoing PCI at 12 months. It will also provide important information regarding the efficacy of the two different antithrombotic regimens. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02334254).

Topics: Adenosine; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Warfarin

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Satisfaction; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban is a new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) that can be prescribed in a fixed dose, making regular monitoring and dose adjustments unnecessary. It has been proven to be safe and effective in comparison with enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonists (LMWH/VKA) for the (extended) treatment of venous thromboembolism in the EINSTEIN studies. Nevertheless, there is a need for information regarding the clinical impact of (major) bleeding events with NOACs such as rivaroxaban.. A post-hoc analysis was performed to compare the severity of clinical presentation and subsequent clinical course of major bleeding with rivaroxaban vs. LMWH/VKA.. Two investigators performed a blinded classification of major bleeding using a priori defined criteria. During the EINSTEIN studies, data concerning the clinical course and measures applied were prospectively collected for each major bleed.. Treatment with LMWH/VKA caused more major bleeding events (1.7%) than rivaroxaban (1.0%; hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.79). Major bleeding events during rivaroxaban therapy had a milder presentation (23% were adjudicated to the worst categories vs. 38% for LMWH/VKA; hazard ratio or HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.74; P = 0.0062). The clinical course was severe in 25% of all major bleeding events associated with rivaroxaban, compared with 33% of LMWH/VKA-associated bleeds (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.96; P = 0.040).. Rivaroxaban-associated major bleeding events occurred less frequently, had a milder presentation and appeared to take a less severe clinical course compared with major bleeding with LMWH/VKA.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Factor VIIa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Plasma; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Single-Blind Method; Thrombophilia; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K

Prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and associated pulmonary embolism following major orthopedic surgeries is challenging, and there is an increased interest in developing new treatment strategies. We compared 2 switch-therapy modalities-enoxaparin to rivaroxaban and enoxaparin to dabigatran-and enoxaparin monotherapy for preventing DVT after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA).. This was a prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled study. We selected 180 eligible patients out of 247 patients undergoing TKA or THA. During the preoperative checkup, patients were randomized to receive either enoxaparin (enoxaparin group) or switch-therapy regimens, comprising enoxaparin during hospitalization and rivaroxaban (rivaroxaban group) or dabigatran (dabigatran group) during the outpatient period. All patients were evaluated for DVT using Doppler ultrasonography (USG) 6 weeks postoperatively. The primary efficacy outcome was the prevention of symptomatic or Doppler ultrasonography (USG)-proven DVT, whereas the primary safety outcome was the incidence of bleeding during the DVT-prophylaxis period.. Doppler USG at 6 weeks after surgery revealed no signs of DVT in any patient. During the hospitalization period, only 2 major bleeding events were reported (1 [1.6%] in the enoxaparin group and 1 [1.6%] in the dabigatran group). No major bleeding events were reported during the outpatient follow-up period in any group. Differences among the 3 groups regarding bleeding events were not statistically significant (p>0.05).. When using switch-therapy modalities, clinicians can take advantage of the safety of enoxaparin during the hospitalization period and ease of use of new oral anticoagulant drugs during the outpatient period.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Ultrasonography, Doppler; Venous Thrombosis

Bleeding is a complication of treatment with factor Xa inhibitors, but there are no specific agents for the reversal of the effects of these drugs. Andexanet is designed to reverse the anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors.. Healthy older volunteers were given 5 mg of apixaban twice daily or 20 mg of rivaroxaban daily. For each factor Xa inhibitor, a two-part randomized placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate andexanet administered as a bolus or as a bolus plus a 2-hour infusion. The primary outcome was the mean percent change in anti-factor Xa activity, which is a measure of factor Xa inhibition by the anticoagulant.. Among the apixaban-treated participants, anti-factor Xa activity was reduced by 94% among those who received an andexanet bolus (24 participants), as compared with 21% among those who received placebo (9 participants) (P<0.001), and unbound apixaban concentration was reduced by 9.3 ng per milliliter versus 1.9 ng per milliliter (P<0.001); thrombin generation was fully restored in 100% versus 11% of the participants (P<0.001) within 2 to 5 minutes. Among the rivaroxaban-treated participants, anti-factor Xa activity was reduced by 92% among those who received an andexanet bolus (27 participants), as compared with 18% among those who received placebo (14 participants) (P<0.001), and unbound rivaroxaban concentration was reduced by 23.4 ng per milliliter versus 4.2 ng per milliliter (P<0.001); thrombin generation was fully restored in 96% versus 7% of the participants (P<0.001). These effects were sustained when andexanet was administered as a bolus plus an infusion. In a subgroup of participants, transient increases in levels of d-dimer and prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 were observed, which resolved within 24 to 72 hours. No serious adverse or thrombotic events were reported.. Andexanet reversed the anticoagulant activity of apixaban and rivaroxaban in older healthy participants within minutes after administration and for the duration of infusion, without evidence of clinical toxic effects. (Funded by Portola Pharmaceuticals and others; ANNEXA-A and ANNEXA-R ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02207725 and NCT02220725.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antidotes; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Protein Precursors; Prothrombin; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

This study assessed the effects and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation. In this double-blind clinical trial, a total of 353 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who were at risk of stroke or systemic embolism were enrolled to receive either rivaroxaban or warfarin. The primary effect endpoint occurred in five patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.29% per year) and in seven patients in the warfarin group (2.91% per year) (hazard ratio with warfarin, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.64-0.91; p = 0.03). Major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 38 patients (14.3% per year) in the rivaroxaban group and in 36 patients (13.7% per year) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio rivaroxaban versus warfarin, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93-1.14; p = 0.39). Adverse events were similar between these two arms (p > 0.05). In conclusion, oral administration of rivaroxaban reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism without significantly increasing the safety concern.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; China; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Primary Prevention; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban demonstrated superior efficacy and a similar safety profile to enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in the phase III RECORD programme in patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery. The XAMOS study investigated adverse events, including bleeding and thromboembolic events, in patients receiving rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in routine clinical practice. XAMOS was a non-interventional, open-label cohort study in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery of the hip or knee (predominantly elective arthroplasty), in which rivaroxaban was compared with other pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. All adverse events were documented, including symptomatic thromboembolic and bleeding events. Crude and adjusted incidences based on propensity score subclasses were calculated and compared between the rivaroxaban and standard-of-care groups. A total of 17,701 patients were enrolled from 252 centres in 37 countries. Crude incidences of symptomatic thromboembolic events three months after surgery in the safety population were 0.89% in the rivaroxaban group (n=8,778) and 1.35% in the standard-of-care group (n=8,635; odds ratio [OR] 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.87), and 0.91% and 1.31% (weighted) in the propensity score-adjusted analysis (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56-0.85), respectively. Treatment-emergent major bleeding events (as defined in the RECORD studies) occurred in 0.40% and 0.34% of patients in the rivaroxaban and standard-of-care groups in the safety population (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.73-1.95), and in 0.44% versus 0.33% (weighted) in the propensity score-adjusted analysis (OR 1.35; 95% CI 0.94-1.93), respectively.This study in unselected patients confirmed the favourable benefit-risk profile of rivaroxaban seen in the RECORD programme.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Cohort Studies; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Odds Ratio; Propensity Score; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Standard of Care; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

This study sought to report additional safety results from the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-daily oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation).. The ROCKET AF trial demonstrated similar risks of stroke/systemic embolism and major/nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (principal safety endpoint) with rivaroxaban and warfarin.. The risk of the principal safety and component bleeding endpoints with rivaroxaban versus warfarin were compared, and factors associated with major bleeding were examined in a multivariable model.. The principal safety endpoint was similar in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups (14.9 vs. 14.5 events/100 patient-years; hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.96 to 1.11). Major bleeding risk increased with age, but there were no differences between treatments in each age category (<65, 65 to 74, ≥75 years; pinteraction = 0.59). Compared with those without (n = 13,455), patients with a major bleed (n = 781) were more likely to be older, current/prior smokers, have prior gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, mild anemia, and a lower calculated creatinine clearance and less likely to be female or have a prior stroke/transient ischemic attack. Increasing age, baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mm Hg, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or GI bleeding, prior acetylsalicylic acid use, and anemia were independently associated with major bleeding risk; female sex and DBP <90 mm Hg were associated with a decreased risk.. Rivaroxaban and warfarin had similar risk for major/nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding. Age, sex, DBP, prior GI bleeding, prior acetylsalicylic acid use, and anemia were associated with the risk of major bleeding. (An Efficacy and Safety Study of Rivaroxaban With Warfarin for the Prevention of Stroke and Non-Central Nervous System Systemic Embolism in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: NCT00403767).

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Pressure; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Patient Safety; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban has proved effective and safe in patients undergoing hip and knee replacement surgery. As it is unclear whether it is also effective and safe in fracture patients, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with lower limb fractures. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 2,050 consecutive patients treated for lower limb fractures at our trauma center, comparing rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding and surgical complications, and the length of hospital stay for 608 patients who received rivaroxaban and 717 who received a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Rates of symptomatic VTE were 4.9 and 8.6% in the rivaroxaban and LMWH groups, respectively (p = 0.008), and distal VTE rates were 1.8 and 5.7%, respectively (p = 0.036). The incidence of major bleeding events in the rivaroxaban group was also lower than in the LMWH group (0.2 vs 0.6%), but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. The mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the rivaroxaban group (12.2 vs 13.1 days, respectively; p = 0.016). This retrospective cohort study is the first report documenting the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with lower extremity fractures. In comparison with LMWH, rivaroxaban reduced the incidence of VTE by 45% without increasing the risk of bleeding. However, prospective, randomized controlled trials comparing rivaroxaban and LMWH are needed to confirm our findings.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fractures, Bone; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Incidence; Length of Stay; Lower Extremity; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

D-dimer concentrations have not been evaluated extensively as a predictor of increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients.. To analyze the relationships between D-dimer concentration, VTE and bleeding in the MAGELLAN trial (NCT00571649).. This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Patients aged ≥ 40 years, hospitalized for acute medical illnesses with risk factors for VTE received subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for 10 ± 4 days then placebo up to day 35, or oral rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 35 ± 4 days. Patients (n = 7581) were grouped by baseline D-dimer ≤ 2 × or > 2 × the upper limit of normal. VTE and major plus non-major clinically relevant bleeding were recorded at day 10, day 35, and between days 11 and 35.. The frequency of VTE was 3.5-fold greater in patients with high D-dimer concentrations. Multivariate analysis showed that D-dimer was an independent predictor of the risk of VTE (odds ratio 2.29 [95% confidence interval 1.75-2.98]), and had a similar association to established risk factors for VTE, for example cancer and advanced age. In the high D-dimer group, rivaroxaban was non-inferior to enoxaparin at day 10 and, unlike the low D-dimer group, superior to placebo at day 35 (P < 0.001) and days 11-35 (P < 0.001). In both groups, bleeding outcomes favored enoxaparin/placebo.. Elevated baseline D-dimer concentrations may identify acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients at high risk of VTE for whom extended anticoagulant prophylaxis may provide greater benefit than for those with low D-dimer concentrations.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Multivariate Analysis; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

There are no data regarding management and outcomes of major bleeding events in patients treated with oral factor Xa inhibitors.. Using data from ROCKET AF, we analysed the management and outcomes of major bleeding overall and according to the randomized treatment. During a median follow-up of 1.9 years, 779 (5.5%) patients experienced major bleeding at a rate of 3.52 events/100 patient-years with a similar event rate in each arm (n = 395 rivaroxaban vs. n = 384 warfarin). The median number of transfused packed red blood cells (PRBC) per episode was similar in both arms [2 (25th, 75th: 2, 4) units]. Overall, few transfusions of whole blood (n = 14), platelets (n = 10), or cryoprecipitate (n = 2) were used. Transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) was significantly less in the rivaroxaban arm (n = 45 vs. n = 81 units) after adjustment for covariates [odds ratio (OR) 0.43 (95% CI 0.29-0.66); P < 0.0001]. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) were administered less in the rivaroxaban arm (n = 4 vs. n = 9). Outcomes after major bleeding, including stroke or non-central nervous system embolism (4.7% rivaroxaban vs. 5.4% warfarin; HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.42-1.88) and all-cause death (20.4% rivaroxaban vs. 26.1% warfarin; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.46-1.04) were similar in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin (interaction P = 0.51 and 0.11).. Among high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation who experienced major bleeding in ROCKET AF, the use of FFP and PCC was less among those allocated rivaroxaban compared with warfarin. However, use of PRBCs and outcomes after bleeding were similar among patients randomized to rivaroxaban or to warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Transfusion; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Plasma; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

To investigate the risk of hidden blood loss about applying rivaroxaban after total hip arthroplasty.. From October 2009 to May 2012,88 patients with femoral head necrosis were treated with primary total hip arthroplasty. All the patients were divided into Rivaroxaban group(44 cases)and control group(44 cases). There were 25 males and 19 females in the Rivaroxaban group, with an average age of (58.48 +/- 15.19) years old; in the control group,24 patients were male and 20 patients were female, with an average age of (61.11 +/- 13.54) years old. The patients in the Rivaroxaban group took Rivaroxaban orally from the first day after operation with a dose of 10 mg each day, and treatment course was 14 days. The patients in the control group took placebo orally at the same time. Dominant blood loss and transfusion were recorded, blood routine examinations were taken before operation and at 3 days after operation. The total blood loss and hidden blood loss were calculated according to the formula.. The mean total blood loss was (1509.56 +/- 325.23) ml and the hidden blood loss was(581.47 +/- 215.01) ml, accounting for (37.88 +/- 10.42)% in the Rivaroxaban group. The mean total blood loss was (1262.30 +/- 397.95) ml and the hidden blood loss was (395.59 +/- 97.33) ml, accounting for (30.62 +/- 0.20)% in the control group. The total blood loss, hidden blood loss and transfusion in the Rivaroxaban group was significantly more than those in control group,b ut there was no significant difference on dominant blood loss between two groups.. Rivaroxaban increased the overall bleeding risk of total hip arthroplasty, especially hidden bleeding risk, which should be careful used.

Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Case-Control Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Time Factors

Time in therapeutic range (TTR) is a standard quality measure of the use of warfarin. We assessed the relative effects of rivaroxaban versus warfarin at the level of trial center TTR (cTTR) since such analysis preserves randomized comparisons.. TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method, without exclusion of international normalized ratio (INR) values performed during warfarin initiation. Measurements during warfarin interruptions >7 days were excluded. INRs were performed via standardized finger-stick point-of-care devices at least every 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint (stroke or non-central nervous system embolism) was examined by quartiles of cTTR and by cTTR as a continuous function. Centers with the highest cTTRs by quartile had lower-risk patients as reflected by lower CHADS2 scores (P<0.0001) and a lower prevalence of prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (P<0.0001). Sites with higher cTTR were predominantly from North America and Western Europe. The treatment effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin on the primary endpoint was consistent across a wide range of cTTRs (P value for interaction=0.71). The hazard of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding increased with cTTR (P for interaction=0.001), however, the estimated reduction by rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the hazard of intracranial hemorrhage was preserved across a wide range of threshold cTTR values.. The treatment effect of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism is consistent regardless of cTTR.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Embolism; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; North America; Point-of-Care Systems; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), which contain factor II, FVII, FIX, and FX, have shown the potential to reverse the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban in healthy volunteers. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a three-factor PCC, which contains little FVII, has a similar effect.. We performed an open-label, single-center, parallel-group study comparing the effect of a three-factor PCC (Profilnine SD) with that of a four-factor PCC (Beriplex P/N) on the pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in 35 healthy volunteers. After receiving 4 days of rivaroxaban 20 mg twice daily to obtain supratherapeutic steady-state concentrations, volunteers were randomized to receive a single 50 IU kg(-1) bolus dose of four-factor PCC, three-factor PCC or saline 4 h after the morning dose of rivaroxaban on day 5, and the effects of these interventions on prothrombin time and thrombin generation were determined. Within 30 min, four-factor PCC reduced mean prothrombin time by 2.5-3.5 s, whereas three-factor PCC produced only a 0.6-1.0-s reduction. In contrast, three-factor PCC reversed rivaroxaban-induced changes in thrombin generation more than four-factor PCC.. This study demonstrates the potential of both three-factor and four-factor PCCs to at least partially reverse the anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban in healthy adults. The discrepant effects of the PCC preparations may reflect differences in the procoagulant components present in each.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticoagulants; Area Under Curve; Blood Coagulation Factors; Body Mass Index; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Factor IX; Factor VII; Factor X; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Prothrombin; Prothrombin Time; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Worldwide, rivaroxaban is increasingly used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and treatment of venous thromboembolism, but little is known about rivaroxaban-related bleeding complications in daily care. Using data from a prospective, noninterventional oral anticoagulation registry of daily care patients (Dresden NOAC registry), we analyzed rates, management, and outcome of rivaroxaban-related bleeding. Between October 1, 2011, and December 31, 2013, 1776 rivaroxaban patients were enrolled. So far, 762 patients (42.9%) reported 1082 bleeding events during/within 3 days after last intake of rivaroxaban (58.9% minor, 35.0% of nonmajor clinically relevant, and 6.1% major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition). In case of major bleeding, surgical or interventional treatment was needed in 37.8% and prothrombin complex concentrate in 9.1%. In the time-to-first-event analysis, 100-patient-year rates of major bleeding were 3.1 (95% confidence interval 2.2-4.3) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and 4.1 (95% confidence interval 2.5-6.4) for venous thromboembolism patients, respectively. In the as-treated analysis, case fatality rates of bleeding leading to hospitalizations were 5.1% and 6.3% at days 30 and 90 after bleeding, respectively. Our data indicate that, in real life, rates of rivaroxaban-related major bleeding may be lower and that the outcome may at least not be worse than that of major vitamin K antagonist bleeding, and probably better. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as identifier #NCT01588119.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Germany; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Prospective Studies; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Although the rate of bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking novel oral anticoagulants in randomized controlled trials is described, the rate of bleeding with "real-world" use is uncertain.. We conducted a retrospective electronic medical record interrogation and subsequent chart review among patients within Intermountain Healthcare between October 2010 and November 2012. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of AF and were receiving either dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Rates of major bleeding were calculated.. Among 2579 patients, 13 (0.5%) experienced major bleeding (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.77), 5 (0.19%) experienced intracranial hemorrhage (95% CI 0.02-0.36), and 2 (0.08%) experienced fatal bleeding. Of the 13 patients experiencing a major bleed, 8 (61.5%) would have been excluded from the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) and Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) clinical trials.. We observed a rate of major bleeding similar to that reported in randomized clinical trials among patients with AF prescribed dabigatran or rivaroxaban.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medical Records Systems, Computerized; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is common in elderly patients, who face an elevated risk of stroke but difficulty sustaining warfarin treatment. The oral factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF). This prespecified secondary analysis compares outcomes in older and younger patients.. There were 6229 patients (44%) aged ≥75 years with atrial fibrillation and ≥2 stroke risk factors randomized to warfarin (target international normalized ratio=2.0-3.0) or rivaroxaban (20 mg daily; 15 mg if creatinine clearance <50 mL/min), double blind. The primary end point was stroke and systemic embolism by intention to treat. Over 10 866 patient-years, older participants had more primary events (2.57% versus 2.05%/100 patient-years; P=0.0068) and major bleeding (4.63% versus 2.74%/100 patient-years; P<0.0001). Stroke/systemic embolism rates were consistent among older (2.29% rivaroxaban versus 2.85% warfarin per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio=0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.02) and younger patients (2.00% versus 2.10%/100 patient-years; hazard ratio=0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.19; interaction P=0.313), as were major bleeding rates (≥75 years: 4.86% rivaroxaban versus 4.40% warfarin per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio=1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.34; <75 years: 2.69% versus 2.79%/100 patient-years; hazard ratio=0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.19; interaction P=0.336). Hemorrhagic stroke rates were similar in both age groups; there was no interaction between age and rivaroxaban response.. Elderly patients had higher stroke and major bleeding rates than younger patients, but the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban relative to warfarin did not differ with age, supporting rivaroxaban as an alternative for the elderly.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Whether heart failure (HF) increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is not well established. In the phase III MAGELLAN (Multicenter, rAndomized, parallel Group Efficacy and safety study for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medically iLL patients comparing rivaroxabAN with enoxaparin) trial, extended-duration rivaroxaban was compared with standard-duration enoxaparin followed by placebo for VTE prevention in 8101 hospitalized acutely ill patients with or without HF. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the relationship between HF severity and the risk of VTE in MAGELLAN patients.. Hospitalized patients diagnosed with HF were included according to New York Heart Association class III or IV at admission (n=2593). HF severity was determined by N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma concentrations (median 1904 pg/mL). Baseline plasma D-dimer concentrations ranged from 0.6 to 1.7 μg/L for the less and more severe HF subgroups. Patients with more severe HF had a greater incidence of VTE versus patients with less severe HF, with a significant trend up to Day 10 (4.3% versus 2.2%; P=0.0108) and Day 35 (7.2% versus 4.1%; P=0.0150). Multivariable analysis confirmed that NT-proBNP concentration was associated with VTE risk up to Day 10 (P=0.017) and D-dimer concentration with VTE risk up to Day 35 (P=0.005). The association between VTE risk and HF severity that was observed in the enoxaparin/placebo group was not seen in the extended-duration rivaroxaban group.. Patients with more severe HF, as defined by high NT-proBNP plasma concentration, were at increased risk of VTE. NT-proBNP may be useful to identify high short-term risk, whereas elevated D-dimer may be suggestive of high midterm risk.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00571649.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Multivariate Analysis; Predictive Value of Tests; Primary Prevention; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

We investigated clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with significant valvular disease (SVD) in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF) trial.. ROCKET AF excluded patients with mitral stenosis or artificial valve prostheses. We used Cox regression to adjust comparisons for potential confounders. Among 14 171 patients, 2003 (14.1%) had SVD; they were older and had more comorbidities than patients without SVD. The rate of stroke or systemic embolism with rivaroxaban vs. warfarin was consistent among patients with SVD [2.01 vs. 2.43%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.27] and without SVD (1.96 vs. 2.22%; HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.07; interaction P = 0.76). However, rates of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding with rivaroxaban vs. warfarin were higher in patients with SVD (19.8% rivaroxaban vs. 16.8% warfarin; HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.49) vs. those without (14.2% rivaroxaban vs. 14.1% warfarin; HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.94-1.10; interaction P = 0.034), even when controlling for risk factors and potential confounders. In intracranial haemorrhage, there was no interaction between patients with and without SVD where the overall rate was lower among those randomized to rivaroxaban.. Many patients with 'non-valvular atrial fibrillation' have significant valve lesions. Their risk of stroke is similar to that of patients without SVD after controlling for stroke risk factors. Efficacy of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin was similar in patients with and without SVD; however, the observed risk of bleeding was higher with rivaroxaban in patients with SVD but was the same among those without SVD. Atrial fibrillation patients with and without SVD experience the same stroke-preventive benefit of oral anticoagulants.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aortic Valve Insufficiency; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

X-VeRT is the first prospective randomized trial of a novel oral anticoagulant in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective cardioversion.. We assigned 1504 patients to rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily, 15 mg if creatinine clearance was between 30 and 49 mL/min) or dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in a 2:1 ratio. Investigators selected either an early (target period of 1-5 days after randomization) or delayed (3-8 weeks) cardioversion strategy. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral embolism, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 5 (two strokes) of 978 patients (0.51%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 5 (two strokes) of 492 patients (1.02%) in the VKA group [risk ratio 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-1.73]. In the rivaroxaban group, four patients experienced primary efficacy events following early cardioversion (0.71%) and one following delayed cardioversion (0.24%). In the VKA group, three patients had primary efficacy events following early cardioversion (1.08%) and two following delayed cardioversion (0.93%). Rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly shorter time to cardioversion compared with VKAs (P < 0.001). Major bleeding occurred in six patients (0.6%) in the rivaroxaban group and four patients (0.8%) in the VKA group (risk ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.21-2.67).. Oral rivaroxaban appears to be an effective and safe alternative to VKAs and may allow prompt cardioversion.. Clinicaltrials.gov;. NCT01674647.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

For 60 years, vitamin K antagonists have been used in prevention of thromboembolic complications in the course of atrial fibrillation (AF), however such therapy is associated with many inconveniences. New oral anticoagulants (NOAC), rivaroxaban and dabigatran, represent an attractive alternative to VKA.. Yo evaluate the safety of a 6-month therapy with rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients (pts) with persistent AF.. The analysis included 24 pts (14 females, 10 males) with nonvalvular AF and indications for oral anticoagulant therapy (CHA2DS2-VASc > or = 2, HAS-BLED < 3), hospitalized in the Clinic of Internal Diseases and Clinical Pharmacology of the Medical University of Lodz between July 2012 and September 2013. In the group of patients treated chronically with VKA, laboratory tests (GFR, creatinine, ALT AST, coagulation) were performed during their stay in the clinic. The patients were randomly assigned to the treatment with one of the new NOACs, rivaroxaban or dabigatran. After a 6-month period, the patients completed a questionnaire on their general health condition and follow-up laboratory tests were performed.. In the group of pts. receiving dabigatran INR increased by 23% (p = 0.0002) and APTT prolongation by 91% was noted (p = 0.0004) whereas in the group of pts receiving rivaroxaban an INR increase by 17% (p = 0.04) and APTT prolongation by 32% (p = 0.0043) were observed. After a 6-month therapy, dabigatran prolongs APTT significantly more, as compared to rivaroxaban (p=0.0002). Among patients using dabigatran, 16.7% experienced the following symptoms: abdominal pain, gastritis, nausea. 8.3% patients experienced bleeding from haemorrhoids, easier bruising. In the group of patients receiving rivaroxaban, 16.7% experienced the following symptoms: nosebleeds and easier bruising; 8.3%: bleeding from gums, haematuria. 25%: pruritus, rash: 8.3%. The hazard ratio (HR) for occurrence of dyspeptic symptoms was 1.13 for dabigatran. Minor bleeding is 3.6 times more common when using rivaroxaban.. Significant increase of INR and prolongation of APTT are observed after a 6-month therapy with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. Additionally, dabigatran significantly prolongs the prothrombin time. Despite the fact that dabigatran caused larger prolongation of APTT minor bleeding episodes occurred more frequently in patients treated with rivaroxaban. No worsening of kidney or liver function was observed during the 6-month therapy with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. Rywaroxaban more frequently causes minor bleeding, whereas treatment with dabigatran is associated with more frequent gastrointestinal adverse symptoms.

Topics: Aged; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism

In ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation), a large randomized, clinical trial, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.. To determine the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin among vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-naive and VKA-experienced patients.. Prespecified subgroup analysis. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00403767).. Global.. 14,264 persons with atrial fibrillation.. Interaction of the relative treatment effect of rivaroxaban and warfarin on stroke or systemic embolism among VKA-naive and VKA-experienced patients.. Overall, 7897 (55.4%) patients were VKA-experienced and 6367 (44.6%) were VKA-naive. The effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin on stroke or systemic embolism was consistent: Rates per 100 patient-years of follow-up were 2.32 versus 2.87 for VKA-naive patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.64 to 1.03]) and 1.98 versus 2.09 for VKA-experienced patients (HR, 0.94 [CI, 0.75 to 1.18]; interaction P = 0.36). During the first 7 days, rivaroxaban was associated with more bleeding than warfarin (HR in VKA-naive patients, 5.83 [CI, 3.25 to 10.44], and in VKA-experienced patients, 6.66 [CI, 3.83 to 11.58]; interaction P = 0.53). After 30 days, rivaroxaban was associated with less bleeding than warfarin in VKA-naive patients (HR, 0.84 [CI, 0.74 to 0.95]) and similar bleeding in VKA-experienced patients (HR, 1.06 [CI, 0.96 to 1.17]; interaction P = 0.003).. The trial was not designed to detect differences in these subgroups.. The efficacy of rivaroxaban in VKA-experienced and VKA-naive patients was similar to that of the overall trial. There were more bleeding events within 7 days of study drug initiation with rivaroxaban, but after 30 days, rivaroxaban was associated with less bleeding in VKA-naive patients and similar bleeding in VKA-experienced patients. This information may be useful to clinicians considering a transition to rivaroxaban for patients receiving VKA therapy.. Johnson & Johnson and Bayer HealthCare.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Warfarin and aspirin are used to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). There are inherent challenges with both treatments, including variable and inconsistent benefit and increased bleeding risks. The availability of new anticoagulants offers some alternatives.. A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis to evaluate direct and indirect treatment data including aspirin, warfarin apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban for the prevention of primary or secondary stroke in patients with AF.. A comprehensive, systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized trials comparing aspirin, warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in patients with AF requiring treatment for stroke prevention. Open-label and blinded designs were included if they evaluated any stroke or any bleeding event. Data on stroke and bleeding events were abstracted, verified, evaluated, scored, and entered into Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16 to generate a mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Direct and indirect comparisons were evaluated, and we looked for inconsistency in closed loop structures. Data are reported as rate ratios with 95% credible intervals. In addition, we reviewed variance statistics and explored variance with node-splitting models.. Our literature search yielded 30 articles, 21 of which were included. All treatments except aspirin reduced the risk of any stroke compared with placebo. Warfarin (0.43 [0.33-0.57]), apixaban (0.37 [0.27-0.54]), dabigatran (0.34 [0.21-0.57]), rivaroxaban (0.36 [0.22-0.60]), and aspirin with clopidogrel (0.73 [0.53-0.99]) were more protective than aspirin alone. Warfarin and the new anticoagulants were similar in the reduction of stroke, vascular death, and mortality. There was no difference in major bleeding between any treatment group. There were more nonmajor bleeding events when comparing warfarin and apixaban (1.83 [1.05-4.03]); no other differences between warfarin and the other new anticoagulants were found.. This mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis found similarity between warfarin and the new anticoagulants with the exception of one comparison, in which warfarin was associated with more non-major bleeding than apixaban. Thus, the new anticoagulants are therapeutically comparable when warfarin is inappropriate.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Databases, Bibliographic; Double-Blind Method; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

The clinically appropriate duration of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with acute medical illnesses is unknown. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban administered for an extended period, as compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin administered for a standard period, followed by placebo.. We randomly assigned patients 40 years of age or older who were hospitalized for an acute medical illness to receive subcutaneous enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, for 10±4 days and oral placebo for 35±4 days or to receive subcutaneous placebo for 10±4 days and oral rivaroxaban, 10 mg once daily, for 35±4 days. The primary efficacy outcomes were the composite of asymptomatic proximal or symptomatic venous thromboembolism up to day 10 (noninferiority test) and up to day 35 (superiority test). The principal safety outcome was the composite of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.. A total of 8101 patients underwent randomization. A primary efficacy outcome event occurred in 78 of 2938 patients (2.7%) receiving rivaroxaban and 82 of 2993 patients (2.7%) receiving enoxaparin at day 10 (relative risk with rivaroxaban, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.31; P=0.003 for noninferiority) and in 131 of 2967 patients (4.4%) who received rivaroxaban and 175 of 3057 patients (5.7%) who received enoxaparin followed by placebo at day 35 (relative risk, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.96; P=0.02). A principal safety outcome event occurred in 111 of 3997 patients (2.8%) in the rivaroxaban group and 49 of 4001 patients (1.2%) in the enoxaparin group at day 10 (P<0.001) and in 164 patients (4.1%) and 67 patients (1.7%) in the respective groups at day 35 (P<0.001).. In acutely ill medical patients, rivaroxaban was noninferior to enoxaparin for standard-duration thromboprophylaxis. Extended-duration rivaroxaban reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of bleeding. (Funded by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Research and Development; MAGELLAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00571649.).

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Acute coronary syndromes arise from coronary atherosclerosis with superimposed thrombosis. Since factor Xa plays a central role in thrombosis, the inhibition of factor Xa with low-dose rivaroxaban might improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome.. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 15,526 patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome to receive twice-daily doses of either 2.5 mg or 5 mg of rivaroxaban or placebo for a mean of 13 months and up to 31 months. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke.. Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the primary efficacy end point, as compared with placebo, with respective rates of 8.9% and 10.7% (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.96; P=0.008), with significant improvement for both the twice-daily 2.5-mg dose (9.1% vs. 10.7%, P=0.02) and the twice-daily 5-mg dose (8.8% vs. 10.7%, P=0.03). The twice-daily 2.5-mg dose of rivaroxaban reduced the rates of death from cardiovascular causes (2.7% vs. 4.1%, P=0.002) and from any cause (2.9% vs. 4.5%, P=0.002), a survival benefit that was not seen with the twice-daily 5-mg dose. As compared with placebo, rivaroxaban increased the rates of major bleeding not related to coronary-artery bypass grafting (2.1% vs. 0.6%, P<0.001) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.6% vs. 0.2%, P=0.009), without a significant increase in fatal bleeding (0.3% vs. 0.2%, P=0.66) or other adverse events. The twice-daily 2.5-mg dose resulted in fewer fatal bleeding events than the twice-daily 5-mg dose (0.1% vs. 0.4%, P=0.04).. In patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome, rivaroxaban reduced the risk of the composite end point of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Rivaroxaban increased the risk of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage but not the risk of fatal bleeding. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer Healthcare; ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00809965.).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Anticoagulants; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes

The RECORD programme compared oral rivaroxaban with enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective total hip or knee replacement. This analysis compared the safety of concomitant use of specified medications with rivaroxaban and enoxaparin by evaluating postoperative bleeding rates from the pooled RECORD1-4 data.. The co-medications were non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and platelet function inhibitors, including acetylsalicylic acid (no dose restriction). The endpoints evaluated were the composite of major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding and any bleeding occurring after first oral study drug intake. The time relative to surgery was stratified into three time periods: day 1-3, day 4-7 and after day 7. Relative bleeding rate ratios for co-medication use versus non-use were derived using stratified Mantel-Haenszel methods and compared between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin groups.. Co-medication use with rivaroxaban or enoxaparin resulted in non-significant increases in bleeding events. Respective rate ratios were not significantly different between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin for all bleeding endpoints with concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (any bleeding, 1.22 vs 1.22; major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding, 1.28 vs 0.90) and with concomitant use of platelet function inhibitors/acetylsalicylic acid (any bleeding, 1.32 vs 1.40; major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding, 1.11 vs 1.13).. This explorative analysis indicates that there is no significant increase in bleeding risk for rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin when co-administered with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or acetylsalicylic acid, although, because of low usage, the experience with platelet function inhibitors (except acetylsalicylic acid) was limited.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Aspirin; Drug Interactions; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

To compare the main efficacy and safety endpoints of the pivotal randomised clinical trials (RCTs) on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention after total hip (THR) or knee (TKR) replacement with the new oral anticoagulants (NAs) versus enoxaparin.. A pool-analysis of 10 RCTs that included 32.144 randomised patients was performed. Efficacy outcomes were total VTE and all-cause mortality, major VTE, and proximal DVT. Safety outcomes were major bleeding, and clinically relevant (major or non-major) bleeding.. Overall, a significant effect favouring NAs was found for the primary efficacy outcome (RR 0.71; 95%CI 0.56-0.90), major VTE (RR 0.59; 95%CI 0.41-0.84), and proximal DVT (RR 0.51; 95%CI 0.35-0.76). Compared to enoxaparin 40 mg QD, rivaroxaban showed superiority (RR 0.50; 95%CI 0.34-0.73), followed by apixaban (RR 0.63; 95%CI 0.36-1.01) and dabigatran (RR 1.02; 95%CI 0.86-1.20). There was significant heterogeneity among trials and subgroups analysed for these efficacy outcomes. Major bleeding (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.74-1.46) and clinically relevant bleeding (RR 1.03; 95%CI 0.88-1.21) was similar with NAs or enoxaparin. Rivaroxaban showed a trend toward more major bleeding episodes than enoxaparin (RR 1.88; 95%CI 0.92-3.82) and apixaban showed the lowest clinically relevant bleeding risk (RR 0.81; 95%CI 0.64-1.01).. Overall, NAs showed more efficacy and same safety when compared to the recommended dose of enoxaparin after THR and TKR. There are little differences in efficacy and bleeding risk among NAs and the type of prophylaxis that should be analysed further.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

A fixed-dose regimen of rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, has been shown to be as effective as standard anticoagulant therapy for the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis, without the need for laboratory monitoring. This approach may also simplify the treatment of pulmonary embolism.. In a randomized, open-label, event-driven, noninferiority trial involving 4832 patients who had acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism with or without deep-vein thrombosis, we compared rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily) with standard therapy with enoxaparin followed by an adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist for 3, 6, or 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.. Rivaroxaban was noninferior to standard therapy (noninferiority margin, 2.0; P=0.003) for the primary efficacy outcome, with 50 events in the rivaroxaban group (2.1%) versus 44 events in the standard-therapy group (1.8%) (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.68). The principal safety outcome occurred in 10.3% of patients in the rivaroxaban group and 11.4% of those in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P=0.23). Major bleeding was observed in 26 patients (1.1%) in the rivaroxaban group and 52 patients (2.2%) in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.79; P=0.003). Rates of other adverse events were similar in the two groups.. A fixed-dose regimen of rivaroxaban alone was noninferior to standard therapy for the initial and long-term treatment of pulmonary embolism and had a potentially improved benefit-risk profile. (Funded by Bayer HealthCare and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; EINSTEIN-PE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00439777.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enoxaparin; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pulmonary Embolism; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Plasma proteins mediate thrombogenesis, inflammation, endocardial injury and structural remodelling in atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesised that anti-coagulation with rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, would differentially modulate biologically-relevant plasma proteins, compared with warfarin, a multi-coagulation protein antagonist. We performed unbiased liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectroscopy and candidate multiplexed protein immunoassays among Japanese subjects with non-valvular chronic AF who were randomly assigned to treatment with 24 weeks of rivaroxaban (n=93) or warfarin (n=94). Nine metaproteins, including fibulin-1 (p=0.0033), vitronectin (p=0.0010), haemoglobin α (p=0.0012), apolipoproteins C-II (p=0.0017) and H (p=0.0023), complement C5 precursor (p=0.0026), coagulation factor XIIIA (p=0.0026) and XIIIB (p=0.0032) subunits, and 10 candidate proteins, including thrombomodulin (p=0.0004), intercellular adhesion molecule-3 (p=0.0064), interleukin-8 (p=0.0007) and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (p=0.0003), were differentially expressed among patients with and without known clinical risk factors for stroke and bleeding in AF. Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban treatment was associated with a greater increase in thrombomodulin (Δ 0.1 vs. 0.3 pg/ml, p=0.0026) and a trend towards a reduction in matrix metalloproteinase-9 (Δ 2.2 vs. -4.9 pg/ml, p=0.0757) over 24 weeks. Only modest correlations were observed between protein levels and prothrombin time, factor Xa activity and prothrombinase-induced clotting time. Plasma proteomics can identify distinct functional patterns of protein expression that report on known stroke and bleeding risk phenotypes in an ethnically-homogeneous AF population. The greater upregulation of thrombomodulin among patients randomised to rivaroxaban represents a proof-of-principle that pharmacoproteomics can be employed to discern novel effects of factor Xa inhibition beyond standard pharmacodynamic measures.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Blood Proteins; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Proteomics; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Warfarin

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

Over recent years, research on anticoagulant drugs has been guided by the requirement for convenient administration and a wide therapeutic window to allow fixed dosing without the need for coagulation monitoring. Rivaroxaban is the first of a new class of anticoagulant drugs, the direct, selective inhibitors of Factor Xa. The EINSTEIN-extension study compared rivaroxaban with placebo in patients who completed their standard treatment course after venous thromboembolism (VTE), in whom there was equipoise with respect to the need for continued anticoagulation. After 6-12 months of treatment, rivaroxaban significantly reduced the risk of recurrent VTE at the cost of a moderate increase in bleeding complications. Overall, these results suggest that rivaroxaban can be a valid alternative to warfarin for patients requiring long-term secondary prevention of VTE. However, additional data are needed for special populations including the elderly, patients with cancer, renally impaired patients and morbidly obese patients, all of whom were scarcely represented in this trial.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

The use of warfarin reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustment. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide more consistent and predictable anticoagulation than warfarin.. In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 14,264 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk for stroke to receive either rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 20 mg) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The per-protocol, as-treated primary analysis was designed to determine whether rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the primary end point of stroke or systemic embolism.. In the primary analysis, the primary end point occurred in 188 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 241 in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 269 patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.1% per year) and in 306 patients in the warfarin group (2.4% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.12 for superiority). Major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 1475 patients in the rivaroxaban group (14.9% per year) and in 1449 in the warfarin group (14.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.44), with significant reductions in intracranial hemorrhage (0.5% vs. 0.7%, P=0.02) and fatal bleeding (0.2% vs. 0.5%, P=0.003) in the rivaroxaban group.. In patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson and Bayer; ROCKET AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00403767.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and renal insufficiency are at increased risk for ischaemic stroke and bleeding during anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor metabolized predominantly by the liver, preserves the benefit of warfarin for stroke prevention while causing fewer intracranial and fatal haemorrhages.. We randomized 14 264 patients with AF in a double-blind trial to rivaroxaban 20 mg/day [15 mg/day if creatinine clearance (CrCl) 30-49 mL/min] or dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0). Compared with patients with CrCl >50 mL/min (mean age 73 years), the 2950 (20.7%) patients with CrCl 30-49 mL/min were older (79 years) and had higher event rates irrespective of study treatment. Among those with CrCl 30-49 mL/min, the primary endpoint of stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 2.32 per 100 patient-years with rivaroxaban 15 mg/day vs. 2.77 per 100 patient-years with warfarin [hazard ratio (HR) 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.23] in the per-protocol population. Intention-to-treat analysis yielded similar results (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.63-1.17) to the per-protocol results. Rates of the principal safety endpoint (major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding: 17.82 vs. 18.28 per 100 patient-years; P = 0.76) and intracranial bleeding (0.71 vs. 0.88 per 100 patient-years; P = 0.54) were similar with rivaroxaban or warfarin. Fatal bleeding (0.28 vs. 0.74% per 100 patient-years; P = 0.047) occurred less often with rivaroxaban.. Patients with AF and moderate renal insufficiency have higher rates of stroke and bleeding than those with normal renal function. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effect across dosing groups. Dose adjustment in ROCKET-AF yielded results consistent with the overall trial in comparison with dose-adjusted warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

To investigate the effect of rivaroxaban on the risk of bleeding after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).. A total of 119 cases undergoing primary TKA because of knee osteoarthritis between June 2009 and May 2011, were randomly divided into the rivaroxaban group (59 cases) and the control group (60 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, height, weight, side, disease duration, and grade of osteoarthritis between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The preoperative preparation and operative procedure of 2 groups were concordant. At 1-14 days after TKA, rivaroxaban 10 mg/d were taken orally in the rivaroxaban group, and placebo were given in the control group. The blood routine examination was performed before operation and at 2 days postoperatively; the total blood loss and hemoglobin (HGB) decrease were calculated according to the formula; the blood loss, postoperative wound drainage, and wound exudate after extubation were recorded to calculate the dominant amount of blood loss; and the bleeding events were recorded within 35 days postoperatively.. The total blood loss and HGB decrease were (1 198.34 +/- 222.06) mL and (33.29 +/- 4.99) g/L in the rivaroxaban group and were (1 124.43 +/- 261.01) mL and (31.57 +/- 6.17) g/L in the control group, showing no significant difference (P > 0.05); the postoperative dominant blood loss in the rivaroxaban group [(456.22 +/- 133.12) mL] was significantly higher than that in the control group [(354.53 +/- 96.71) mL] (t = 4.773, P = 0.000). The bleeding events occurred in 3 cases (5.1%) of the rivaroxaban group and in 1 case (1.7%) of the control group, showing no significant difference (chi2 = 1.070, P = 0.301).. Rivaroxaban has some effects on the risk of bleeding after TKA. In general, rivaroxaban is safe.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Young Adult

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common significant cardiac arrhythmia, increases the risk of stroke, particularly in the elderly. Warfarin is effective in reducing stroke risk but is burdensome to patients and is difficult to control. Rivaroxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor in advanced development as an alternative to warfarin for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.. ROCKET AF is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, event-driven trial, which aims to establish the noninferiority of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF who have a history of stroke or at least 2 additional independent risk factors for future stroke. Patients are randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban, 20 mg once daily (od), or dose-adjusted warfarin titrated to a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.5 (range 2.0-3.0, inclusive) using point-of-care INR devices to receive true or sham INR values, depending on the study drug allocation. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of all-cause stroke and noncentral nervous system systemic embolism. The primary safety end point is the composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events. Over 14,000 patients have been randomized at 1,100 sites across 45 countries, and will be followed until 405 primary outcome events are observed.. The ROCKET AF study will determine the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban as an alternative to warfarin for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medical Records; Morpholines; Research Design; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are novel oral anticoagulants approved for prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty. However, information assessing clinically important efficacy and bleeding outcomes of these 2 new agents versus low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) is lacking.. We separately pooled efficacy and safety data from 6 phase III randomized trials (18 405 participants) comparing equivalent durations of treatment with enoxaparin (40 mg once daily [od] or 30 mg twice daily) versus dabigatran (220 mg od) or versus rivaroxaban (10 mg od) after hip or knee arthroplasty. Odds ratios (OR) for individual outcomes were calculated for each trial and were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Compared with dabigatran, enoxaparin had a similar risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism plus all-cause mortality (0.9% versus 1.1%; OR, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 1.31; I²=76%) and bleeding (5.0% versus 5.6%; OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.15; I²=0%). Compared with rivaroxaban, enoxaparin had a 2-fold higher risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism plus all-cause mortality (1.2% versus 0.6%; OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.17; P<0.001; number needed to treat, 167; I²=0%) but demonstrated a significant lower risk of bleeding (2.5% versus 3.1%; OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.99; P=0.049; number needed to harm, 167; I²=0%).. In patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, enoxaparin and dabigatran showed similar rates of efficacy and bleeding. Enoxaparin was less effective than rivaroxaban but had a lower risk of bleeding. These results may have important implications for the choice of prophylactic agent in major joint arthroplasty.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Withholding Treatment

Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide a simple, fixed-dose regimen for treating acute deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and for continued treatment, without the need for laboratory monitoring.. We conducted an open-label, randomized, event-driven, noninferiority study that compared oral rivaroxaban alone (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily) with subcutaneous enoxaparin followed by a vitamin K antagonist (either warfarin or acenocoumarol) for 3, 6, or 12 months in patients with acute, symptomatic DVT. In parallel, we carried out a double-blind, randomized, event-driven superiority study that compared rivaroxaban alone (20 mg once daily) with placebo for an additional 6 or 12 months in patients who had completed 6 to 12 months of treatment for venous thromboembolism. The primary efficacy outcome for both studies was recurrent venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in the initial-treatment study and major bleeding in the continued-treatment study.. The study of rivaroxaban for acute DVT included 3449 patients: 1731 given rivaroxaban and 1718 given enoxaparin plus a vitamin K antagonist. Rivaroxaban had noninferior efficacy with respect to the primary outcome (36 events [2.1%], vs. 51 events with enoxaparin-vitamin K antagonist [3.0%]; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 1.04; P<0.001). The principal safety outcome occurred in 8.1% of the patients in each group. In the continued-treatment study, which included 602 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 594 in the placebo group, rivaroxaban had superior efficacy (8 events [1.3%], vs. 42 with placebo [7.1%]; hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.39; P<0.001). Four patients in the rivaroxaban group had nonfatal major bleeding (0.7%), versus none in the placebo group (P=0.11).. Rivaroxaban offers a simple, single-drug approach to the short-term and continued treatment of venous thrombosis that may improve the benefit-to-risk profile of anticoagulation. (Funded by Bayer Schering Pharma and Ortho-McNeil; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00440193 and NCT00439725.).

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism is recommended for at least 10 days after total knee arthroplasty; oral regimens could enable shorter hospital stays. We aimed to test the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty.. In a randomised, double-blind, phase III study, 3148 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty received either oral rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, beginning 6-8 h after surgery, or subcutaneous enoxaparin 30 mg every 12 h, starting 12-24 h after surgery. Patients had mandatory bilateral venography between days 11 and 15. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of any deep-vein thrombosis, non-fatal pulmonary embolism, or death from any cause up to day 17 after surgery. Efficacy was assessed as non-inferiority of rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin in the per-protocol population (absolute non-inferiority limit -4%); if non-inferiority was shown, we assessed whether rivaroxaban had superior efficacy in the modified intention-to-treat population. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00362232.. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 67 (6.9%) of 965 patients given rivaroxaban and in 97 (10.1%) of 959 given enoxaparin (absolute risk reduction 3.19%, 95% CI 0.71-5.67; p=0.0118). Ten (0.7%) of 1526 patients given rivaroxaban and four (0.3%) of 1508 given enoxaparin had major bleeding (p=0.1096).. Oral rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 10-14 days was significantly superior to subcutaneous enoxaparin 30 mg given every 12 h for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty.. Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Phlebography; Risk Reduction Behavior; Rivaroxaban; Sensitivity and Specificity; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

Rivaroxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been effective in prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. However, its use after acute coronary syndromes has not been investigated. In this setting, we assessed the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban and aimed to select the most favourable dose and dosing regimen.. In this double-blind, dose-escalation, phase II study, undertaken at 297 sites in 27 countries, 3491 patients stabilised after an acute coronary syndrome were stratified on the basis of investigator decision to use aspirin only (stratum 1, n=761) or aspirin plus a thienopyridine (stratum 2, n=2730). Participants were randomised within each strata and dose tier with a block randomisation method at 1:1:1 to receive either placebo or rivaroxaban (at doses 5-20 mg) given once daily or the same total daily dose given twice daily. The primary safety endpoint was clinically significant bleeding (TIMI major, TIMI minor, or requiring medical attention); the primary efficacy endpoint was death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or severe recurrent ischaemia requiring revascularisation during 6 months. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00402597.. Three patients in stratum 1 and 26 in stratum 2 never received the study drug. The risk of clinically significant bleeding with rivaroxaban versus placebo increased in a dose-dependent manner (hazard ratios [HRs] 2.21 [95% CI 1.25-3.91] for 5 mg, 3.35 [2.31-4.87] for 10 mg, 3.60 [2.32-5.58] for 15 mg, and 5.06 [3.45-7.42] for 20 mg doses; p<0.0001). Rates of the primary efficacy endpoint were 5.6% (126/2331) for rivaroxaban versus 7.0% (79/1160) for placebo (HR 0.79 [0.60-1.05], p=0.10). Rivaroxaban reduced the main secondary efficacy endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with placebo (87/2331 [3.9%] vs 62/1160 [5.5%]; HR 0.69, [95% CI 0.50-0.96], p=0.0270). The most common adverse event in both groups was chest pain (248/2309 [10.7%] vs 118/1153 [10.2%]).. The use of an oral factor Xa inhibitor in patients stabilised after an acute coronary syndrome increases bleeding in a dose-dependent manner and might reduce major ischaemic outcomes. On the basis of these observations, a phase III study of low-dose rivaroxaban as adjunctive therapy in these patients is underway.. Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development and Bayer Healthcare AG.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Aspirin; Chest Pain; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Recurrence; Risk Reduction Behavior; Rivaroxaban; Safety; Statistics, Nonparametric; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome

We performed a randomized dose-ranging study, double-blind for rivaroxaban doses and open-label for the comparator (low-molecular-weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists) to assess the optimal dose of rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. A total of 543 patients with acute deep-venous thrombosis received rivaroxaban 20, 30, or 40 mg once daily or comparator. Treatment lasted for 84 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the 3-month incidence of the composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolic complications and asymptomatic deterioration in thrombotic burden as assessed by comparison of ultrasound and perfusion lung scanning at day 84 with baseline. The main safety outcome was the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. A total of 449 (83%) of the 543 patients could be included in the per-protocol population. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 6.1%, 5.4%, and 6.6% of the rivaroxaban 20-, 30-, and 40-mg treatment groups, respectively, and in 9.9% of those receiving standard therapy. The main safety outcome occurred in 5.9%, 6.0%, and 2.2% of the rivaroxaban 20-, 30-, and 40-mg treatment groups, respectively, and in 8.8% of those receiving standard therapy. These results with simple fixed-dose oral regimens justify phase 3 evaluations (www.ClinicalTrials.gov no.NCT00395772).

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombin III; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography; Venous Thrombosis

Joint replacement surgery is an appropriate model for dose-ranging studies investigating new anticoagulants.. To assess the efficacy and safety of a novel, oral, direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor--BAY 59-7939--relative to enoxaparin in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement.. In this double-blind, double-dummy, dose-ranging study, patients were randomized to oral BAY 59-7939 (2.5, 5, 10, 20, or 30 mg b.i.d.), starting 6-8 h after surgery, or s.c. enoxaparin 40 mg once daily, starting on the evening before surgery. Treatment was continued until mandatory bilateral venography was performed 5-9 days after surgery.. Of 706 patients treated, 548 were eligible for the primary efficacy analysis. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of any deep vein thrombosis, non-fatal pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality; rates were 15%, 14%, 12%, 18%, and 7% for BAY 59-7939 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg b.i.d., respectively, compared with 17% for enoxaparin. The primary efficacy analysis did not demonstrate any significant trend in dose-response relationship for BAY 59-7939. The primary safety endpoint was major, postoperative bleeding; there was a significant increase in the frequency of events with increasing doses of BAY 59-7939 (P = 0.045), but no significant differences between individual BAY 59-7939 doses and enoxaparin.. When efficacy and safety were considered together, the oral, direct FXa inhibitor BAY 59-7939, at 2.5-10 mg b.i.d., compared favorably with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939)--an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor--could be an alternative to heparins and warfarin for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator-controlled, multinational, dose-ranging study assessed the efficacy and safety of once-daily rivaroxaban relative to enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. Patients (n=873) were randomized to once-daily oral rivaroxaban doses of 5, 10, 20, 30, or 40 mg (initiated 6 to 8 hours after surgery) or a once-daily subcutaneous enoxaparin dose of 40 mg (given the evening before and > or = 6 hours after surgery). Study drugs were continued for an additional 5 to 9 days; mandatory bilateral venography was performed the following day. The primary end point (composite of any deep vein thrombosis, objectively confirmed pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality) was observed in 14.9%, 10.6%, 8.5%, 13.5%, 6.4%, and 25.2% of patients receiving 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg rivaroxaban, and 40 mg enoxaparin, respectively (n=618, per-protocol population). No significant dose-response relationship was found for efficacy (P=0.0852). Major postoperative bleeding was observed in 2.3%, 0.7%, 4.3%, 4.9%, 5.1%, and 1.9% of patients receiving 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg rivaroxaban, and 40 mg enoxaparin, respectively (n=845, safety population), representing a significant dose-response relationship (P=0.0391).. Rivaroxaban showed efficacy and safety similar to enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement, with the convenience of once-daily oral dosing and without the need for coagulation monitoring. When both efficacy and safety are considered, these results suggest that 10 mg rivaroxaban once daily should be investigated in phase III studies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Postmenopause; Postoperative Complications; Rivaroxaban; Safety; Sample Size; Survival Analysis; Thiophenes

BAY 59-7939, a novel, oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, is in clinical development for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), a frequent complication following orthopaedic surgery.. In a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy study, 621 patients undergoing elective total knee replacement were randomly assigned to oral BAY 59-7939 (2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg b.i.d., initiated 6-8 h postsurgery), or subcutaneous enoxaparin (30 mg b.i.d., initiated 12-24 h postsurgery). Treatment was continued until mandatory bilateral venography 5-9 days after surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of any deep vein thrombosis (proximal and/or distal), confirmed non-fatal pulmonary embolism and all-cause mortality during treatment. The primary safety endpoint was major, postoperative bleeding during treatment.. Of the 613 patients treated, 366 (59.7%) were evaluable for the primary efficacy analysis. The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 31.7%, 40.4%, 23.3%, 35.1%, and 25.4% of patients receiving 2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 30 mg b.i.d. doses of BAY 59-7939, respectively (test for trend, P = 0.29), compared with 44.3% in the enoxaparin group. The frequency of major, postoperative bleeding increased with increasing doses of BAY 59-7939 (test for trend, P = 0.0007), with no significant difference between any dose group compared with enoxaparin. Bleeding endpoints were lower for the 2.5-10 mg b.i.d. doses compared with higher doses of BAY 59-7939.. Oral administration of 2.5-10 mg b.i.d. of BAY 59-7939, early in the postoperative period, showed potential efficacy and an acceptable safety profile, similar to enoxaparin, for the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing elective total knee replacement.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombin III; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Increased bleeding risk was found associated with concurrent prescription of rivaroxaban and amiodarone. We previously recommended dose adjustment for rivaroxaban utilizing a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach. Our subsequent in vitro studies discovered the pivotal involvement of human renal organic anion transporter 3 (hOAT3) in the renal secretion of rivaroxaban and the inhibitory potency of amiodarone. This study aimed to redefine the disease-drug-drug interactions (DDDI) between rivaroxaban and amiodarone and update the potential risks.. Prospective simulations were conducted with updated PBPK models of rivaroxaban and amiodarone incorporating hOAT3-related parameters.. Simulations to recapitulate previously explored DDDI in renal impairment showed a higher bleeding tendency in all simulation scenarios after integrating hOAT3-mediated clearance into PBPK models. Further sensitivity analysis revealed that both hOAT3 dysfunction and age could affect the extent of DDDI, and age was shown to have a more pivotal role on rivaroxaban in vivo exposure. When amiodarone was prescribed along with our recommended dose reduction of rivaroxaban to 10 mg in moderate renal impaired elderly people, it could result in persistently higher rivaroxaban peak concentrations at a steady state. To better manage the increased bleeding risk among such a vulnerable population, a dose reduction of rivaroxaban to 2.5 mg twice daily resulted in its acceptable in vivo exposure.. Close monitoring of bleeding tendency is essential for elderly patients with moderate renal impairment receiving co-prescribed rivaroxaban and amiodarone. Further dose reduction is recommended for rivaroxaban to mitigate this specific DDDI risk.

Topics: Aged; Amiodarone; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban

Direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are now commonly prescribed medications. Urgent reversal of their anticoagulant effect is sometimes required in emergency situations. In Australia, a specific reversal agent for factor Xa (FXa)-inhibitor DOAC is not available. Instead, two non-specific haemostatic agents, activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and 3 factor-prothrombin complex concentrate (3F-PCC), are used off-label despite a paucity of evidence for their effectiveness or safety.. To provide further insight into the efficacy and safety of 3F-PCC and aPCC for the reversal of the anticoagulant effect of FXa inhibitor DOACs.. We conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study to investigate the use of aPCC and 3F-PCC for patients on FXa-inhibitor DOAC who present with a significant bleeding event or who require urgent surgery. The primary outcome was haemostatic efficacy according to prespecified criteria. Safety outcomes included the thromboembolic event rate and all-cause mortality during the hospital admission.. A total of 51 patients was included in the study (36 patients who had a spontaneous bleeding event and 15 non-bleeding patients who required urgent perioperative management). Thirty-one patients received aPCC and 20 patients received 3F-PCC. Haemostasis was adjudicated as effective in all assessable patients (n = 50; 100%). Thromboembolic events occurred in three patients who received aPCC and one patient who received 3F-PCC. All-cause mortality was 7.8% (four patients).. Both aPCC and 3F-PCC are useful adjuncts for the management of patients who require urgent reversal of the anticoagulant effect of FXa-inhibitor DOAC. However, the risk of thromboembolism in this patient group requires careful consideration. Prospective, comparator studies are needed along with the development of guidelines that reflect the availability of haemostatic agents in Australia.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Australia; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism

Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is used routinely to establish rhythm control. There is mounting evidence that CA procedures should be performed during continuous oral anticoagulation and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are considered the first anticoagulation strategy. Few real-life data are now available and even less in the Italian panorama.. IRIS is an Italian multicenter, non-interventional, prospective study which will be enrolled consecutive AF patients eligible for CA and treated with Rivaroxaban; patients in treatment with Rivaroxaban proceeded directly to CA while Rivaroxaban-naive patients were scheduled for CA after 4 weeks of uninterrupted anticoagulation unless the exclusion of atrial thrombi. Rivaroxaban was uninterrupted or shortly uninterrupted (<24 hours) prior CA, in line with routinely practice of each operator. Patients will be followed on continuous anticoagulation for 1 month after the ablation. The primary efficacy outcome is the cumulative incidence of all-cause death and systemic embolism while the primary safety outcome is the incidence of major bleeding events. The secondary outcomes are represented by non-major bleeding events. All events must be occurred within the first 30 days after the procedure.. Two hundred fifty patients are expected to be enrolled and the study is estimated to be completed by the end of 2022. Up to now 56 patients have been enrolled.. This study is the first large Italian prospective study on the management of Rivaroxaban in patients undergoing CA of AF. It aims to depict a comprehensive view of anticoagulation strategy prior CA in several Italian electrophysiology labs.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Pyridones; Ritonavir; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban is used increasingly as an oral anticoagulant; however, a specific reversal agent is not currently available in the Australasian setting. There is also variation across international consensus guidelines regarding advice on the management of bleeding.. To review the real-world management of rivaroxaban-associated major bleeding across the public hospitals of New Zealand's largest city.. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed of patients prescribed rivaroxaban who presented to four metropolitan hospital Emergency Departments between 1 August 2018 and 31 May 2021 with major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.. One hundred and twelve patients were identified, accounting for 115 major bleeding presentations. Upper gastrointestinal (34%) and intracranial (31%) bleeding sites were most common. Procedural intervention was required in 44% of patients. Haemostatic management involved tranexamic acid (TXA) in 26%, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in 55% (dose range 1000-6000 IU or 10-65 IU/kg), vitamin K in 16% and fresh frozen plasma in 1%. Rivaroxaban was discontinued permanently following 56 (49%) events, switched to another anticoagulant in 24 (21%) and withheld in 30 (26%) from 2 days to 3 months (median 8.5 days). All-cause mortality at 90 days after bleeding was 17% (19 patients), and the incidence of combined venous and arterial thrombotic events was 10%.. There is considerable heterogeneity in the acute clinical management of patients presenting with rivaroxaban-related major bleeding. The use of PCC and dosage administered is inconsistent. TXA was utilised in only approximately one-quarter of all cases. Evidence-based guidance for treating rivaroxaban-related bleeding would improve the management of these patients and potentially improve clinical outcomes.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Tranexamic Acid

This study attempts to identify predictors associated with bleeding and stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) in Singaporean Asians taking rivaroxaban and apixaban.. A total of 134 Singaporean patients on either rivaroxaban or apixaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation were included for this study. Baseline characteristics were recorded at recruitment while bleeding and SSE events were recorded during a 1-year follow-up. Peak and trough drug plasma concentrations were collected based on the dosing interval and pharmacokinetics of the drugs and quantified using high performance liquid chromatography. Characteristics of patients with or without bleeds were compared using relevant statistical tests. Multivariable regression that included covariates with p < 0.1 from an initial univariable regression was performed to analyse predictors that resulted in higher risk of bleeding in patients.. Median creatinine clearance (CrCl) was significantly lower in patients on rivaroxaban who experienced bleeds as compared to patients who did not experience bleeds (61.5 vs 70.8 mL/min, p = 0.047), while concomitant simvastatin use was found to be independently associated with a sixfold increased risk of bleeding (adjusted OR = 6.14 (95% CI: 1.18-31.97), p = 0.031) for rivaroxaban after controlling for body mass index, CrCl and having experienced a previous SSE.. Our findings suggest that concomitant use of simvastatin with rivaroxaban may be associated with bleeding events in an Asian cohort. Further studies using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling are required to investigate the drug-drug interactions between these drugs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atorvastatin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Simvastatin; Singapore; Stroke

Compare costs associated with all-cause healthcare resource use (HCRU), stroke/systemic thromboembolism (STE) and major bleedings (MB) between patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) initiating apixaban or other oral anticoagulants (OACs).. We performed a retrospective cohort study using the French healthcare claims database, including NVAF patients between 2014/01/01 and 2016/12/31, followed until 2016/12/31. We used 4 sub-cohorts of OAC-naive patients, respectively initiating apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or VKAs. We matched patients initiating apixaban with patients initiating each other OACs using 1:n propensity score matching. All-cause HCRU and event-related costs by OAC treatment were estimated and compared between matched patients using generalised-linear models with gamma-distribution and two-part models.. There were 175,766 patients in the apixaban-VKA, 181,809 in the apixaban-rivaroxaban, and 42,490 in the apixaban-dabigatran matched cohorts. Patients initiating apixaban had significantly lower HCRU costs than patients initiating VKA (€1,105 vs. €1,578, p < 0.0001), dabigatran (€993 vs. €1,140, p < 0.0001) and rivaroxaban (€1,013 vs. €1,088 p < 0.0001). They have had significantly lower costs related to stroke/STE and MB than patients initiating VKA (respectively, €183 vs. €449 and €147 vs. €413; p < 0.0001), rivaroxaban (respectively, €145 vs. €197 and €129 vs. €193; p < 0.0001), and lower costs related to stroke/STE than patients initiating dabigatran (€135 vs. €192, p < 0.02). Costs related to MB were not significantly different in patients initiating apixaban and those initiating dabigatran (€119 vs. €149, p = 0.07).. HCRU and most event-related costs were lower in patients initiating apixaban compared to other OACs. Apixaban may be cost-saving compared to VKAs, and significantly cheaper than other DOACs, although cost differences are limited.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; France; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

To investigate and describe the protocolized treatment of DOAC-related bleeds in all Dutch hospitals.. From August to December 2020 a nationwide survey among all 70 hospitals in the Netherlands was conducted on their protocols for management of bleeding in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs, i.e. apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran). The protocols were assessed the following characteristics: bleeding definitions (mild, moderate and severe bleed), diagnostic parameters (hemoglobin [Hb], loss of blood, surgical procedure needed, etc), first and second choice of treatment, effectiveness criteria and the level of evidence/references upon which protocols were based.. All 70 hospitals responded (100%). We received 69 protocols in total, 6 of which were identical because hospitals worked together. In 35 (50%) of the protocols a definition of minor, moderate or severe bleeds was described. Diagnostic parameters for bleeds were present in 2%, 41% and 47% of protocols for a mild, moderate and severe bleed. While the first choice treatment for severe bleeding under dabigatran was idarucizumab in 96% of protocols, considerably more therapeutic options (mostly different prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) doses) are described for Xa inhibitors. When considering criteria for effectiveness more than 90% of protocols did not have a clear description.. This study provides an overview of the current state of protocols for management of DOAC-related bleeding in The Netherlands. Protocols vary in the content of information provided and often do not include information, especially for diagnostic criteria and criteria for establishing the effectiveness of the intervention. The results of this study can assist in improving and harmonizing the protocols.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Hospitals; Humans; Netherlands; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

Clinical trials provide conflicting evidence regarding oral factor Xa inhibitors for prevention of ischemic stroke in patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (AF).. We performed a critical appraisal of randomized clinical trials that tested oral factor Xa inhibitors in patients without AF that reported ischemic stroke.. Considering the 11 trials that reported > 10 ischemic strokes during follow-up (97,578 participants, 1195 ischemic strokes), 1 tested apixaban (57 strokes), 1 betrixaban (52 strokes), and 9 rivaroxaban (1086 strokes). In 7 trials with placebo comparisons, numerically fewer ischemic strokes occurred among those assigned factor Xa inhibitors in 7 of 8 randomized comparisons (range of hazard ratios [HRs], 0.89-0.51), including statistically significant reductions in 2 trials that compared rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily vs placebo on a background of aspirin in patients with cardiovascular disease, COMPASS (HR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.68) and COMMANDER-HF (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.95). Compared with aspirin in 4 trials, oral factor Xa inhibitors were associated with fewer ischemic strokes in 2, with statistically significant reduction in 1 (rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily in COMPASS; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.90). Major bleeding was increased by oral factor Xa inhibitors in all 7 placebo-controlled trials (HR range, 1.42-4.08), with statistically significant increases reported in 5 trials, and in all 4 aspirin-controlled trials (all statistically significant increases; HR range, 1.52-2.72).. Aggregate evidence on the basis of placebo comparisons from randomized trials supports the potential for oral factor Xa inhibitors to reduce ischemic stroke in patients without AF, but major bleeding is increased.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

To investigate and describe the protocolized perioperative management in patient using Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in Dutch hospitals.. Between August and December 2020, a nationwide survey in 70 hospitals in the Netherlands was conducted. We asked hospital pharmacists to submit their protocols for perioperative management of DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) users. The protocols were assessed for a number of parameters divided into categories: interruption and restart timetables DOACs for elective procedures, criteria for the start of an urgent procedure without antidotes, criteria for the use of antidotes and advised antidotes for urgent procedures.. A total of 49 hospitals (70%) sent a protocol for perioperative management of DOACs. Two pairs of protocols were identical because hospitals cooperated closely, leaving 47 individual protocols for analysis. Thirty-five of these protocols contained a policy for both elective and urgent procedure; five protocols contained only a policy for elective and seven only for urgent procedures. In protocols for elective procedure, we found great variation in interruption and restart timetables intended for patients with renal impairment (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Ratio < 80 ml/min). In case of urgent procedures, there is variation in choice of antidote, criteria for administration of an antidote and antidote dosing.. This study provides an overview of the current state of the perioperative protocols in the Netherlands in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. Protocols are often not complete and show important and unwanted variation. We have found that national guidelines do not provide unambiguous advice on all points (urgent procedures) and are therefore often elaborated at a local level. The results of this research can help in improving and harmonizing the perioperative protocols on a national level.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Hospitals; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

Data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients are controversial. In patients without atrial fibrillation (AF), rivaroxaban showed enhanced ischemia and bleeding as compared to standard of care. ENVISAGE showed enhanced bleeding in AF patients as compared to vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Only apixaban was non-inferior but failed superiority regarding bleeding in AF patients after TAVR. One could hypothesize that this might be due to pharmacokinetics of NOACs. Therefore, we compared outcome in rivaroxaban/edoxaban (once-daily) and apixaban (twice-daily) treated patients. 568 patients with indication for permanent oral anticoagulation due to AF undergoing TAVR were analyzed via inverse probability of treatment weighting. Valve academic research consortium complications during 30-day follow-up were assessed. Bleeding complications were similar in once-daily and twice-daily NOACs (major: 22 (7.5%) vs. 14 (5.3%), p = 0.285; minor: 66 (22.4%) vs. 46 (17.4%), p = 0.133). Complications did not change when splitting the cohort in the different agents apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban. These findings remained robust after multivariate analysis. In summary, twice-daily and once-daily NOACs did not differ regarding bleeding complications in a hypothesis generating real-world cohort of TAVR patients with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome

Data on the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and active cancer are limited in the Japanese real-world setting.. In this subanalysis of the J'xactly study, which was a multicenter, prospective, observational study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with acute VTE and active cancer (n = 193) versus those without active cancer (n = 823).. Compared with patients without active cancer, those with active cancer demonstrated a significantly different age distribution, with fewer aged <65 and ≥75 years; a lower proportion of women; a lower mean body mass index; and a lower proportion of physical inactivity, injury, thrombophilia, and heart failure. There was no difference in the initial dose distribution of rivaroxaban between patients with and without active cancer. The incidences of recurrence or aggravation of symptomatic VTE and major bleeding were not significantly different [VTE: 1.44 % vs. 2.80 % per patient-year, hazard ratio (HR) 0.50, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.18-1.39, p = 0.172; major bleeding: 4.49 % vs. 2.55 % per patient-year, HR 1.80, 95 % CI 0.82-3.95, p = 0.137]. Approximately 10 % of patients with active cancer died at 6 months, with a significantly higher cumulative all-cause mortality rate than those without active cancer (23.29 % vs. 2.03 % per patient-year, HR 11.31, 95 % CI 7.30-17.53, p < 0.001).. In patients with VTE and active cancer, rivaroxaban showed acceptable effectiveness, although clinically significant bleeding remains a concern.. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000025072.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

We assessed the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT).. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding were assessed.. Short-term, low-dose rivaroxaban seems safe and effective for IDDVT treatment.

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) mitigate stroke and systemic embolism (SE) risk in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients but can increase the risk of major bleeding (MB). This study analyzed the gains in event-free time for these outcomes among OAC treatment options represented in the ARISTOPHANES study.. This sub-analysis consisted of NVAF patients who initiated warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban from 01JAN2013-30SEP2015, with data pooled from Medicare and 4 US commercial claims databases. Propensity score matching was conducted between non-vitamin K antagonist OAC (NOAC) and warfarin cohorts in each database and results were pooled. Laplace regression was used to evaluate the delay in time to stroke/SE and MB events between NOACs and warfarin and between NOACs after the first 12-months of follow-up.. The population included 466,991 patients (167,413 warfarin; 108,852 apixaban; 37,724 dabigatran; and 153,002 rivaroxaban). Event-free time gain (95% confidence interval) for apixaban versus warfarin was 101 days (78- 124) for stroke/SE and 116 (103- 130) days for MB. The gain in event-free time for dabigatran versus warfarin was 45 days (3- 87) for stroke/SE and 92 (68- 116) days for MB. The gain in event-free time for rivaroxaban versus warfarin was 63 days (42- 84) for stroke/SE but event-free time decreased by 18 (-31-6) days for MB.. Over 12 months after initiation, apixaban and dabigatran conferred progressive increases in event free time for stroke/SE and MB vs warfarin, whereas rivaroxaban conferred an increase in stroke/SE-free time but a loss in MB-free time vs warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Little is known about the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in clinical practice. We therefore conducted a prospective observational study to determine the rate of ischemic, embolic, and bleeding events in patients with AF and PCI treated with rivaroxaban in a real-world experience. The RIVA-PCI ("rivaroxaban in patients with AF who underwent PCI") (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03315650) is a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter study with a follow-up until 14 months, including patients with AF who underwent PCI discharged with rivaroxaban. Between January 2018 and March 2020, 700 patients with PCI treated with rivaroxaban (elective in 50.1%, non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome 43.0%, ST-elevation myocardial infarction in 6.9%) were enrolled at 51 German hospitals. After PCI, a dual antithrombotic therapy consisting of rivaroxaban and a P2Y12 inhibitor was administered in 70.7% and triple antithrombotic therapy in 27.9%, respectively. Follow-up information could be obtained in 695 patients (99.3%). Rivaroxaban has been stopped prematurely in 21.6% of patients. Clinical events under rivaroxaban during the 14-month follow-up compared with those observed in the PIONEER-AF PCI trial included cardiovascular death (2.0% % vs 2.0%), myocardial infarction (0.9% vs 3.0%), stent thrombosis (0.2% vs 0.8%), stroke (1.3% vs 1.3%), International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major (4.2% vs 3.9%), and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding (15.3% vs 12.9%). Therefore, in this real-world experience, rivaroxaban in patients with AF who underwent PCI is associated with ischemic and bleeding event rates comparable with those observed in the randomized PIONEER-AF PCI trial.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

Paediatric clinical practice for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is based on extrapolation from adult trials with minimal data on anticoagulation efficacy and safety in children. Based on EINSTEIN-Jr clinical trial data, rivaroxaban was approved to treat VTE and prevent its recurrence in children of all ages.. To report the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban use in paediatric VTE and to present real-world data, specifically about very young children.. We conducted a retrospective observational study at Birmingham Children's Hospital. Data were collected from patients <16 years old who received rivaroxaban after its licensure in the period between March 2021 and June 2022.. Rivaroxaban was used for treatment of acute VTE in 64 patients. Thrombosis was CVC-related in 26 patients, unprovoked in 3, while the rest had one or more risk factors for VTE. Safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban were assessed in 52 patients after excluding patients who were on current rivaroxaban treatment and those who were lost to follow up or stopped rivaroxaban due to intolerance. No bleeding events were reported, and recurrence of thrombosis occurred in only 3.6 %. About 35 % had normalised re-imaging, 40.3 % improved, 9.6 % were unchanged and 11.5 % stopped rivaroxaban without re-imaging. Rivaroxaban was used for secondary VTE prophylaxis in 6 patients in our cohort with no recurrence of thrombosis or bleeding reports.. Our real-world experience confirmed that rivaroxaban was well tolerated, effective and safe. Further real-world data and observational studies are essential to investigate the use of rivaroxaban among different risk groups.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Child; Child, Preschool; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

In the USA, there is a steady rise of atrial fibrillation due to the aging population with increased morbidity. This study evaluated the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding (MB) among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and multimorbidity prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. Using the CMS Medicare database, a retrospective observational study of adult patients with NVAF and multimorbidity who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017 was conducted. High multimorbidity was classified as having ≥ 6 comorbidities. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the hazard ratios of S/SE and MB among three 1:1 propensity score matched DOAC cohorts. All-cause healthcare costs were estimated using generalized linear models.. Overall 36% of the NVAF study population had high multimorbidity, forming three propensity score matched (PSM) cohorts: 12,511 apixaban-dabigatran, 60,287 apixaban-rivaroxaban, and 12,567 dabigatran-rivaroxaban patients. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE and MB when compared with dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Dabigatran had a lower risk of stroke/SE and a similar risk of MB when compared with rivaroxaban. Compared to rivaroxaban, apixaban patients incurred lower all-cause healthcare costs, and dabigatran patients incurred similar all-cause healthcare costs. Compared to dabigatran, apixaban patients incurred similar all-cause healthcare costs.. Patients with NVAF and ≥ 6 comorbid conditions had significantly different risks for stroke/SE and MB when comparing DOACs to DOACs, and different healthcare expenses. This study's results may be useful for evaluating the risk-benefit ratio of DOAC use in patients with NVAF and multimorbidity.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Multimorbidity; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

In the pivotal randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with atrial fibrillation, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) had similar or even superior efficacy and safety compared with warfarin. However, RCTs comparing different DOACs are nonexistent and previous observational studies have yielded conflicting results. In this nationwide cohort study, rates of any stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) and major bleeding were compared among new users of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban with atrial fibrillation from 2014 to 2019. Inverse probability weighting was used to yield balanced study groups, and outcomes were compared using Cox regression. Stroke/SE rates were similar in patients receiving apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. Dabigatran was associated with twofold higher rates of myocardial infarction (MI) than rivaroxaban (1.4 events/100 person-years (py) vs 0.7 events/100-py, hazard ratio [HR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-4.90) and apixaban (1.4 events/100-py vs 0.7 events/100-py, HR 2.26, 95% CI, 0.90-5.67), although the second comparison included the possibility of a null effect. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher major bleeding rates compared with apixaban (2.9 events/100-py vs 1.8 events/100-py, HR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.13-2.37) and dabigatran (2.9 events/100-py vs 1.4 events/100-py, HR 2.18, 95% CI, 1.21-3.93). Specifically, rivaroxaban had higher rates of major gastrointestinal bleeding and other major bleeding than apixaban. In conclusion, although stroke/SE rates were similar for DOACs, rivaroxaban was associated with higher rates of major bleeding than other DOACs and lower rates of MI than dabigatran. These results may help guide oral anticoagulant selection, especially in patients at high risk of bleeding or MI.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Propensity Score; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes in patients who experienced intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) while taking apixaban or rivaroxaban and were reversed with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCC) or andexanet alfa (AA). This retrospective cohort included adult patients that received 4F-PCC or AA for the initial management of an apixaban- or rivaroxaban-associated ICH. A primary outcome of excellent or good hemostatic efficacy at 12 h post-reversal was assessed. Secondary outcomes evaluated were change in hematoma volume size at 12 h, functional status at discharge, need for surgical intervention or additional hemostatic agents post-reversal, new thrombotic event within 28 days, 28-day all-cause mortality, discharge disposition, and hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay. A total of 70 patients were included (4F-PCC, n = 47; AA, n = 23). For the primary outcome analysis, 21 patients were included in the 4F-PCC group and 12 in the AA group. The rate of effective hemostasis was similar between the 4F-PCC and AA groups (66.7% vs 75%, p = 0.62). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for secondary outcomes, including 28-day mortality (40.4% vs 39.1%, p = 0.92) and thrombotic complications within 28 days of reversal (17.0% vs 21.7%, p = 0.63). In patients who experienced an ICH while taking apixaban or rivaroxaban, 4F-PCC and AA were found to have similar rates of excellent or good hemostatic efficacy.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Factor IX; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

Pericardial bleeding is a rare but life-threatening complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Patients taking uninterrupted oral anticoagulation (AC) may be at increased risk for refractory bleeding despite pericardiocentesis and administration of protamine. In such cases, andexanet alfa can be given to reverse rivaroxaban or apixaban. In this study, we aim to describe the rate of acute hemostasis and thromboembolic complications with andexanet for refractory pericardial bleeding during AF ablation.. In this multicenter, case series, participating centers identified patients who received a dose of apixaban or rivaroxaban within 24 h of AF ablation, developed refractory pericardial bleeding during the procedure despite pericardiocentesis and administration of protamine and received andexanet. Eleven patients met inclusion criteria, with mean age of 73.5 ± 5.3 years and median CHA. In patients on uninterrupted apixaban or rivaroxaban, who develop refractory pericardial bleeding during AF ablation, andexanet can achieve hemostasis thereby avoiding the need for emergent surgery. However, there is a risk of thromboembolism following administration.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Protamines; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism

Drug-specific anti-Xa concentrations can be used to assess the presence of drug effects; however, there is inadequate guidance for clinicians on the interpretation and clinical application of these results. The purpose of this study is to review patients' first apixaban and rivaroxaban anti-Xa concentrations to identify indications for monitoring and common therapeutic interventions made based on the results. In addition, we compared bleeding and thrombotic outcomes between the obesity group body mass index ≥40 kg/m 2 and the standard group body mass index 25-39.9 kg/m 2 . A retrospective analysis was conducted at a large academic medical center from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. Primary outcomes were indications for anti-Xa concentrations and interventions on results. A total of 180 patients were included in the analysis, with 119 patients (66%) in the apixaban group and 61 patients (34%) in the rivaroxaban group. The most common indications for anti-Xa concentrations were extreme body weight (23%) and concern for bleeding (22%). About half of the anti-Xa concentrations resulted in therapy changes including holding for procedure, switching to heparin or enoxaparin, holding for an elevated anti-Xa concentration or concern for bleeding, adjusting direct-acting oral anticoagulant dose, or switching to an alternative oral anticoagulant. There were no differences in bleeding complications (5% [2] vs. 16% [14], P = 0.11) or thrombotic complications (8% [3] vs. 9% [8], P = 0.85) between the obesity group and the standard group. Despite the lack of validation of therapeutic ranges for anti-Xa concentrations, this study showed clinical situations where anti-Xa concentration monitoring can be of value.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current literature for direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in pediatric patients and summarize ongoing trials.. In treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients, evidence supports use of both dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Dabigatran has been shown to be noninferior to standard of care (SOC) in terms of efficacy, with similar bleeding rates. Similarly, treatment with rivaroxaban in children with acute VTE resulted in a low recurrence risk and reduced thrombotic burden, without increased risk of bleeding, compared to SOC. Treatment of pediatric cerebral venous thrombosis as well as central venous catheter-related VTE with rivaroxaban appeared to be both safe and efficacious and similar to that with SOC. Dabigatran also has a favorable safety profile for prevention of VTE, and rivaroxaban has a favorable safety profile for VTE prevention in children with congenital heart disease. Many studies with several different DOACs are ongoing to evaluate both safety and efficacy in unique patient populations, as well as VTE prevention.. The literature regarding pediatric VTE treatment and prophylaxis is growing, but the need for evidence-based pediatric guidelines remains. Additional long-term, postauthorization studies are warranted to further elucidate safety and efficacy in clinical scenarios excluded in clinical trials. Additional data on safety, efficacy, and dosing strategies for reversal agents are also necessary, especially as the use of DOACs becomes more common in the pediatric population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Child; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

In clinical studies, rivaroxaban treatment has been associated with increased incidence of syncope not related to bleeding, anemia, or stroke. The study objective was to evaluate the occurrence of dizziness and/or syncope not related to bleeding, anemia, or stroke in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. A retrospective, observational, comparative study of adult patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and treated with DOACs was conducted using digital retrieval of medical records. Primary outcomes were an emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization due to syncope, fall, or dizziness. Cases related to bleeding, anemia, or stroke were excluded. Separate examination of a sample of records validated the data.. Of 6467 eligible patients, 256 (4%) were hospitalized or referred to the ED due to fall, syncope, or dizziness during a mean observation period of 20.1 months. After multivariate regression analysis, statistically independent risk factors were found to be age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04, P < 0.0001) and benzodiazepine use (HR = 1.33, P = 0.03). No statistically significant difference was found among the different DOAC types regarding the primary outcome (apixaban and rivaroxaban HR = 0.97, P = 0.85; dabigatran and rivaroxaban HR = 1.2, P = 0.386).. The study results failed to confirm the claimed association between the use of a DOAC and syncopal symptoms unrelated to bleeding, anemia, or stroke in this relatively large Israeli patient population. Age and benzodiazepine treatment were significant independent risk factors of these events.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Dizziness; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Syncope

Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in low weight patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear due to few low body weight patients enrolled in clinical trials. To assess bleeding and thrombotic event rates for patients with AF that are prescribed apixaban and have a low versus normal body weight. We analyzed patients with AF prescribed apixaban from 2017 to 2020 with at least 12 months of follow-up. Patients were divided into low [< 60 kg (kg)] and normal (60-100 kg) weight cohorts. Bleeding and thrombotic event rates were compared. Poisson regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted adverse event rates. A total of 545 patients met inclusion criteria. In the unadjusted analysis, there was an increase in non-major bleeding events requiring an Emergency Department visit more often in the low versus normal weight cohort (10.8 versus 7.4 per 100 patient-years, p = 0.15). Thrombotic event rates also occurred more often in the lower versus normal weight cohort (2.4 versus 0.9 per 100 patient-years, p = 0.09). However, adjusted analysis found no statistically significant difference in bleeding or thrombotic events between low and normal weight cohorts. The adjusted hazard ratio for bleeding was similar between the two weight cohorts. The use of apixaban in low body weight patients was not associated with higher rates of bleeding or thrombotic events, compared to those with normal body weight, after adjusting for potential confounding covariates. Larger studies may offer further insight into the overall safety and efficacy of DOAC therapy in these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ideal Body Weight; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thinness; Warfarin

The benefit-risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic liver disease is unclear.. We conducted a new-user, retrospective cohort study of patients with AF and chronic liver disease who were enrolled in a large, US-based administrative database between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of DOACs (as a class and individually) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with AF and chronic liver disease. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and hospitalization for major bleeding. Inverse probability treatment weights were used to balance the treatment groups on measured confounders.. Overall, 10 209 participants were included, with 4421 (43.2%) on warfarin, 2721 (26.7%) apixaban, 2211 (21.7%) rivaroxaban, and 851 (8.3%) dabigatran. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism were 2.2, 1.4, 2.6, and 4.4 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for major bleeding were 7.9, 6.5, 9.1, and 15.0 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. After inverse probability treatment weights, the risk of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism was significantly lower between DOACs as a class (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.46-0.90]) or apixaban (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19-0.82]) compared with warfarin, but not significantly different between rivaroxaban versus warfarin (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.47-1.21]) or rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 0.91-3.29]). Compared with warfarin, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was lower with DOACs as a class (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58-0.82]), apixaban (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46-0.78]), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62-1.0]). However, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was higher for rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.18-2.14]).. Among patients with AF and chronic liver disease, DOACs as a class were associated with lower risks of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding versus warfarin. However, the incidence of clinical outcomes among patients with AF and chronic liver disease varied between individual DOACs and warfarin, and in head-to-head DOAC comparisons.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Liver Diseases; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

An optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis agent should balance efficacy and safety. While rivaroxaban provides effective venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty, it may be associated with higher rates of bleeding. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban to aspirin and enoxaparin.. A large national database was queried for patients who underwent elective primary total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from January 2015 through December 2020 who received rivaroxaban, aspirin, or enoxaparin. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the 90-day risk of bleeding and thromboembolic complications. Among TKA patients identified, 86,721 (10.8%) received rivaroxaban, 408,038 (50.8%) received aspirin, and 108,377 (13.5%) received enoxaparin. Among THA patients, 42,469 (9.5%) received rivaroxaban, 242,876 (54.5%) received aspirin, and 59,727 (13.4%) received enoxaparin.. After accounting for confounding factors, rivaroxaban was associated with increased risk of transfusion (TKA: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.58, P < .001; THA: aOR 1.64, P < .001), pulmonary embolism (TKA: aOR = 1.25, P = .007), and deep vein thrombosis (TKA: aOR = 1.13, P = .022) compared to aspirin. Compared to enoxaparin, rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of combined bleeding events (TKA: aOR = 1.07, P < .001, THA: aOR = 1.11, P < .001), but decreased risk of combined prothrombotic events (THA: aOR = 0.85, P = .036).. Rivaroxaban chemoprophylaxis following TKA and THA was associated with an increased risk of bleeding and prothrombotic complications compared to aspirin and enoxaparin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Aspirin; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

To appraise all available antithrombotic treatments within or after 12 months following coronary revascularization and/or acute coronary syndrome in two network meta-analyses.. Forty-three (N = 189 261 patients) trials within 12 months and 19 (N = 139 086 patients) trials beyond 12 months were included for efficacy/safety endpoints appraisal. Within 12 months, ticagrelor 90 mg bis in die (b.i.d.) [hazard ratio (HR), 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-0.88], aspirin and ticagrelor 90 mg (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95), or aspirin, clopidogrel and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) were the only treatments associated with lower cardiovascular mortality, compared with aspirin and clopidogrel, without or with greater bleeding risk for the first and the other treatment options, respectively. Beyond 12 months, no strategy lowered mortality; compared with aspirin; the greatest reductions of myocardial infarction (MI) were found with aspirin and clopidogrel (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85) or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (HR, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.61-0.95), especially ticagrelor 90 mg (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.92), and of stroke with VKA (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44-0.76) or aspirin and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.76). All treatments increased bleeding except P2Y12 monotherapy, compared with aspirin.. Within 12 months, ticagrelor 90 mg monotherapy was the only treatment associated with lower mortality, without bleeding risk trade-off compared with aspirin and clopidogrel. Beyond 12 months, P2Y12 monotherapy, especially ticagrelor 90 mg, was associated with lower MI without bleeding trade-off; aspirin and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg most effectively reduced stroke, with a more acceptable bleeding risk than VKA, compared with aspirin.Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifiers: CRD42021243985 and CRD42021252398.

Topics: Aspirin; Cardiology; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Coronavirus disease 2019 was spread worldwide, as a pandemic, from December 2019. Venous thromboembolism events can inflict patients with coronavirus disease 2019 during the hospitalization or convalescent period. Therefore, monitoring of these patients, in terms of venous thromboembolism events signs and symptoms, and timely management of antithrombotic agents are of great importance.. A 45-year-old Iranian man, who is the first author of this case report, was infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and displayed the typical signs and symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019. Although reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for coronavirus disease 2019, and specific immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, were negative at first, chest computed tomography scan showed the characteristic pattern of lung involvement of a coronavirus disease 2019 infection including bilateral and multilobar ground-glass opacities. At that time, there were no signs or symptoms of deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism, so these were not investigated. About 30 hours after hospital discharge, the patient presented back to the hospital with acute-onset chest pain. We instantly tested his blood for D-dimer, and sent him to take a Doppler sonography of his lower legs and a chest computed tomography angiography in search of pulmonary thromboembolism and deep-vein thrombosis. Although we could confirm pulmonary thromboembolism with computed tomography angiography in our patient, there were no signs or symptoms of venous thromboembolism in his lower legs, and color Doppler sonography of lower limbs was normal. So, the patient was treated with rivaroxaban as an antithrombotic agent. After some days, he was discharged in good condition. About 1 month later, he was referred to our hospital because of left lower limb edema. Although he was under antithrombotic therapy, color Doppler sonography of lower limbs revealed acute deep-vein thrombosis of the left leg. Hence, we decided to shift antithrombotic therapy from rivaroxaban to warfarin, as it is more potent than rivaroxaban in recurrent venous thromboembolism and when taking new oral anticoagulants. Unlike rivaroxaban, which needs no blood test to monitor its efficacy but has a warning for signs and symptoms of bleeding, warfarin therapy must be monitored carefully by regular blood tests for prothrombin time and international normalized ratio to maintain them in the therapeutic range. The patient was informed about the bleeding cautions, and required regular check of prothrombin time and international normalized ratio to maintain them in the proper and advised range of treatment (international normalized ratio therapeutic range 2-3).. In the case of unexpected recurrent venous thromboembolism in coronavirus disease 2019, especially when patients are taking rivaroxaban or other new oral anticoagulants, such drugs should be substituted by warfarin, with routine follow-up, to maintain the value of prothrombin time and international normalized ratio within the therapeutic range.

Topics: Anticoagulants; COVID-19; Decision Making; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Iran; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; SARS-CoV-2; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

We present a case of cardiopulmonary arrest secondary to rivaroxaban related oropharyngeal hemorrhage, which required rapid intravenous (IV) push administration of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC). Manufacturers recommend administering 4F-PCC IV at a rate of 0.12 mL/kg/min (approximately 3 units/kg/min) up to a maximum rate of 8.4 mL/min (approximately 210 units/min) [1]. The concern with rapid administration is increased potential for thromboembolic complications. There have been small studies assessing infusion rates greater than the manufacturer's recommendation with few reported thromboembolic events [2-5]. Our patient was an 81-year-old female presenting to the emergency department (ED) with sudden onset oropharyngeal hemorrhage. The patient had a pertinent history of oral and esophageal cancer and was prescribed rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily for treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Within moments of the patient arriving, she produced a large volume of blood from her nose and mouth. The source of the bleeding could not be determined, and as suctioning was attempted to clear her airway, the patient became unresponsive and pulseless. Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) procedures were initiated and 1000 mg of tranexamic acid were administered. Once the patient's active medication list was discovered, 2000 units of 4F-PCC was given as an IV push over roughly 20 s. Bleeding was controlled enough to secure the patient's airway within 5 min after 4F-PCC administration and subsequently return of spontaneous circulation was achieved. Unfortunately, the patient suffered a poor neurologic outcome and the family withdrew care after discussion with the treatment team and the patient's oncologist. This case report demonstrates rapid administration of 4F-PCC may be an effective intervention to treat immediately life threatening rivaroxaban related bleeding.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Female; Heart Arrest; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Tranexamic Acid

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are favorable in stroke prevention for geriatric patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation versus warfarin. These anticoagulants do not require international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring and have lower food/drug interactions. In addition, NOACs have risk reduction in bleeding and all-cause mortality compared with warfarin.. At a geriatric primary care practice, two registered nurses manage 88 patients on warfarin for INR monitoring. Nurse practitioners (NPs) provide oversight for warfarin titration after abnormal results. The goal of this quality-improvement project was to decrease the time spent monitoring patients on warfarin.. Primary care providers and cardiologists of patients on warfarin were contacted to gain approval of transition to a NOAC. The NP reviewed patients' renal function and the indication for anticoagulation and then created a list of eligible patients for transition.. Patients eligible for transition to NOACs were contacted for their consent. The transition process included stopping warfarin, ordering apixaban, ordering INR level, educating about starting apixaban, and coordinating appropriate follow-up.. Of 88 patients on warfarin, 21 were eligible for conversion from warfarin to apixaban. Of these 21 patients, 66% ( n = 14) consented to the conversion. Of those who were not converted to apixaban, five declined due to cost and two were lost to follow-up.. There was a reduction in nurses' monthly monitoring of patients on warfarin by 22%. Transition to NOAC was not only beneficial for patient safety and efficacy but also reduced nursing clinical time for anticoagulation encounters.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The risks of thromboembolism and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients were assessed according to the "Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic or Artificial" (EHRA) classification. Additionally, the safety and efficacy of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were compared in AF patients with EHRA type 2 valvular heart disease (VHD) versus those with no VHD.. AF patients enrolled in the "Jordan Atrial Fibrillation (JoFib)" study were followed up for thromboembolic events and major bleeding at 30, 180, and 365 days. Patients in the EHRA type 2 VHD and non-VHD groups were sub-grouped to compare different OACs.. 2020 AF patients were recruited. The thromboembolic risk was higher in EHRA type 2 VHD patients compared to non-VHD controls. Major bleeding also occurred at higher rates in EHRA type 2 patients. In addition, NOACs were more effective in preventing thromboembolic events than VKAs and non-anticoagulation in EHRA type 2 VHD patients. Furthermore, EHRA type 2 VHD patients taking rivaroxaban had significantly less thromboembolic risk than their non-anticoagulated counterparts. At the same time, apixaban and warfarin did not significantly lower the risk of thromboembolism compared to non-anticoagulation.. AF patients with EHRA type 2 VHD are at significant risk of thromboembolism and major bleeding. Furthermore, NOACs were more effective than VKAs in preventing thromboembolic events in this group of patients without conferring an added risk of major bleeding. Moreover, rivaroxaban appears to be particularly efficacious.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Valve Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Jordan; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly being prescribed for prophylaxis of thromboembolic events. Their use, particularly in emergency settings is difficult as blood level measurements are often not immediately available and until recently there was no possibility for reversal. This article presents the case of a severely injured patient with life-threatening traumatic bleeding under long-term treatment with the factor Xa inhibitor apixaban, viscoelasticity-based detection of residual systemic anticoagulatory activity and targeted reversal.. Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien (DOAK) werden zunehmend zur Prophylaxe thrombembolischer Ereignisse eingesetzt. Ihr Umgang, insbesondere in Notfallsituationen, gestaltet sich schwierig, da Spiegelmessungen oft nicht zeitnah zur Verfügung stehen und bis vor Kurzem keine Möglichkeit zur Antagonisierung bestand. Es wird die notfallmäßige Behandlung eines Schwerstmehrfachverletzten mit lebensbedrohlicher traumatischer Blutung unter Dauertherapie mit dem Faktor-Xa-Hemmer Apixaban, viskoelastizitätsbasierter Detektion gerinnungsrelevanter Restaktivität bei Schockraumaufnahme und gezielter Wirkungsaufhebung beschrieben.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

The development of an optimal stroke prevention strategy, including the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, is particularly important for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are living with dementia, a condition that increases the risk of adverse outcomes. However, data on the role of dementia in the safety and effectiveness of OACs are limited.. To assess the comparative safety and effectiveness of specific OACs by dementia status among older patients with AF.. This retrospective comparative effectiveness study used 1:1 propensity score matching among 1 160 462 patients 65 years or older with AF. Data were obtained from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart (January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2021), IBM MarketScan Research Database (January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020), and Medicare claims databases maintained by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy; January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017). Data analysis was performed from September 1, 2021, to May 24, 2022.. Apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin.. Composite end point of ischemic stroke or major bleeding events over the 6-month period after OAC initiation, pooled across databases using random-effects meta-analyses.. Among 1 160 462 patients with AF, the mean (SD) age was 77.4 (7.2) years; 50.2% were male, 80.5% were White, and 7.9% had dementia. Three comparative new-user cohorts were established: warfarin vs apixaban (501 990 patients; mean [SD] age, 78.1 [7.4] years; 50.2% female), dabigatran vs apixaban (126 718 patients; mean [SD] age, 76.5 [7.1] years; 52.0% male), and rivaroxaban vs apixaban (531 754 patients; mean [SD] age, 76.9 [7.2] years; 50.2% male). Among patients with dementia, compared with apixaban users, a higher rate of the composite end point was observed in warfarin users (95.7 events per 1000 person-years [PYs] vs 64.2 events per 1000 PYs; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.7), dabigatran users (84.5 events per 1000 PYs vs 54.9 events per 1000 PYs; aHR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0), and rivaroxaban users (87.4 events per 1000 PYs vs 68.5 events per 1000 PYs; aHR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5). In all 3 comparisons, the magnitude of the benefits associated with apixaban was similar regardless of dementia diagnosis on the HR scale but differed substantially on the rate difference (RD) scale. The adjusted RD of the composite outcome per 1000 PYs for warfarin vs apixaban users was 29.8 (95% CI, 18.4-41.1) events in patients with dementia vs 16.0 (95% CI, 13.6-18.4) events in patients without dementia. The corresponding adjusted RD estimates of the composite outcome were 29.6 (95% CI, 11.6-47.6) events per 1000 PYs in patients with dementia vs 5.8 (95% CI, 1.1-10.4) events per 1000 PYs in patients without dementia for dabigatran vs apixaban users and 20.5 (95% CI, 9.9-31.1) events per 1000 PYs in patients with dementia vs 15.9 (95% CI, 11.4-20.3) events per 1000 PYs in patients without dementia for rivaroxaban vs apixaban users. The pattern was more distinct for major bleeding than for ischemic stroke.. In this comparative effectiveness study, apixaban was associated with lower rates of major bleeding and ischemic stroke compared with other OACs. The increased absolute risks associated with other OACs compared with apixaban were greater among patients with dementia than those without dementia, particularly for major bleeding. These findings support the use of apixaban for anticoagulation therapy in patients living with dementia who have AF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Dementia; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Medicare; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; United States; Warfarin

Over the past 20 years, there has been a shift from vitamin K antagonists to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which include the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. Although DOACs are associated with less serious bleeding than vitamin K antagonists, bleeding still occurs with DOACs, particularly in the elderly and in those with comorbidities. Reversal of the anticoagulant effects of the DOACs may be needed in patients with serious bleeding and in those requiring urgent surgery or intervention. Reversal can be effected with specific agents, such as idarucizumab for dabigatran and andexanet alfa for apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, or with non-specific agents, such as prothrombin complex concentrates, activated prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant activated factor VII. This paper (i) provides an update on when and how to reverse the DOACs, (ii) describes new reversal agents under development, and (iii) provides a strategic framework for the reversal of the factor XI inhibitors currently under investigation in phase three clinical trials.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K

The aim was to analyze the characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of Colombian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) under treatment with oral anticoagulants (OAs).. Retrospective cohort in patients with NVAF identified from a drug dispensing database, aged ≥18 years, with first prescription of an OA (index) between January/2013 and June/2018, and a follow-up until June/2019. Data from the clinical history, pharmacological variables, and outcomes were searched. International Classification of Diseases-10 codes were used to identify the patient sample and outcomes. Patients were followed until a general composite outcome of effectiveness (thrombotic events), bleeding/safety or persistence (switch/discontinuation of anticoagulant) events. Descriptive and multivariate analyzes (Cox regressions comparing warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants-DOACs) were carried out.. The patients with NVAF in this study were mainly older adults with multiple comorbidities. Compared to warfarin, DOACs were found to be equally effective, but safer and had a lower probability of discontinuation or switch.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Colombia; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Evidence and guidelines for Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) use when prescribing concurrent rifampin for tuberculosis treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are limited.. Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database from January 2009 to December 2018, we performed a population-based retrospective cohort study to assess the net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding, of NOACs compared with warfarin among NVAF patients taking concurrent rifampin administration for tuberculosis treatment. After a propensity matching score (PSM) analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression was performed in matched cohorts to investigate the clinical outcomes.. Of the 735 consecutive patients selected, 465 (63.3%) received warfarin and 270 (36.7%) received NOACs. Among 254 pairs of patients after PSM, the crude incidence rate of NACE was 25.6 in NOAC group and 32.8 per 100 person-years in warfarin group. There was no significant difference between NOAC and warfarin use in NACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-1.14; P = 0.172). Major bleeding was the main driver of NACE, and NOAC use was associated with a statistically significantly lower risk of major bleeding than that with warfarin use (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00; P = 0.0499).. In our population-based study, there was no statically significant difference in the occurrence of NACE between NOAC and warfarin use. NOAC use may be associated with a lower risk of major bleeding than that with warfarin use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rifampin; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Tuberculosis; Warfarin

Whether there are differences in direct oral anticoagulants efficacy and safety in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) combined with hypertension is unclear. We therefore conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to assess the differences in the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with AF combined with hypertension. This multicenter retrospective cohort study was based on data from 15 centers in China and included 2086 patients with AF. We divided the patients into dabigatran and rivaroxaban groups according to their direct oral anticoagulants. Propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates between the groups. Due to our limited sample size, the number of cases of some clinical events with low incidence was small. During a mean follow-up period of 10 months, a total of 268 (12.9%) bleeding events occurred, including 27 (1.3%) major bleeding events and 241 (11.6%) minor bleeding events, and 45 (2.2%) thromboembolic events. In patients with AF combined with hypertension, rivaroxaban was associated with a higher major bleeding incidence than dabigatran (odds ratio [OR], 2.89 [95% confidence interval [CI, 1.22-6.87]; P = .012). In contrast, the risk of thromboembolism and minor bleeding was similar for rivaroxaban (OR, 0.55 [95%CI, 0.29-1.01]; P = .069) and dabigatran (OR, 0.82 [95%CI, 0.63-1.08]; P = .150). Based on the results of this study, in patients with AF and hypertension treated with direct oral anticoagulants, the incidence of thromboembolism and minor bleeding was not statistically different between dabigatran and rivaroxaban, but compared with rivaroxaban, dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The aim: To assess the effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy in treatment pulmonary embolism.. Materials and methods: The work analyzed the results of the survey and conservative treatment of 284 patients with pulmonary embolism treated in cardiological department in «Uzhgorod Central City Clinical Hospital» during 2019-2022. Patients were divided into two groups: group I - 250 (88%) patients received anticoagulant therapy; group II - 34 (12%) patients received thrombolytic therapy that was then switched to new oral anticoagulants.. Results: In I group, the first three days were carried out continuously intravenous infusion of heparin in a dose of 25-30 thousand units per day, on the fourth day switched to subcutaneous injection for 10-14 days with subsequent switching to rivaroxaban. 34 (12.0%) patients of the II group, was started with thrombolytic therapy. 32 (94.1%) patients were prescribed alteplase 100 mg/day, and 2 (5.9%) patients - streptokinase 1.5 million units/day. After thrombolysis, patients were prescribed rivaroxaban for prolonged period. Thrombolytic therapy made it possible to prevent fatal cases, and in monotherapy with anticoagulants - mortality was 4.8%. Minor hemorrhagic complications like hematuria, local hematomas at the injection site, bleeding gums were observed in 7.6% of patients during thrombolytic therapy. No cases of large hemorrhages were observed. Manifestations of chronic postembolic pulmonary hypertension in the distant period were found in 97.1% and 6.9% of patients of the I and II groups, respectively. Lethality in the remote period was 5.3% - all in the 1st group of patients due to PE recurrence and acute myocardial infarction.. Conclusions: Implementation of thrombolytic therapy in patients with thromboembolism of the pulmonary artery allows effectively prevent recurrence with a fatal outcome, restore the lumen of the pulmonary arteries and prevent the development of chronic postembolic pulmonary hypertension in the immediate and remote period of observation compared to isolated anticoagulant therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Thrombolytic Therapy; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eye; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

A real-world association between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) concentration and clinical outcomes among Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is reported herein. Patients with AF aged ≥ 20 years who used DOAC for ≥ 3 days were enrolled. Trough and peak DOAC concentrations were measured and compared with the expected range reported in clinical trials. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to investigate the association between concentration and outcomes. From January 2016 to July 2022, a total of 859 patients were enrolled. Among them, 22.5%, 24.7%, 36.4%, and 16.4% were on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, respectively. Compared with clinical trials, the proportion of DOAC concentrations higher or lower than the expected range were 9.0% and 14.6% for trough, respectively, and 20.9% and 12.1% for peak, respectively. The average follow-up duration was 2.4 ± 1.6 years. The incidence of stroke and systemic thromboembolism (SSE) was 1.31 per 100-person years, and low trough concentration predicted SSE (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.78 (1.20, 6.46)). The incidence of major bleeding was 1.64 per 100-person years, and high trough was associated with major bleeding (HR = 2.63 (1.09, 6.39)). The association between peak concentration and SSE or major bleeding was nonsignificant. Off-label underdosing (odds ratio (OR) = 2.69 (1.70, 4.26)), once daily DOAC dosing (OR = 3.22 (2.07, 5.01)), and high creatinine clearance (OR = 1.02 (1.01, 1.03)) caused low trough concentration. Contrarily, congestive heart failure was significantly associated with high trough concentration (OR = 1.71 (1.01, 2.92)). In conclusion, trough DOAC concentration measurements should be considered among patients at risk of out-of-expected range DOAC concentrations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Although widely used in clinical fields, real-world data on the role of warfarin and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are scarce.. This retrospective cohort study compared the effectiveness and safety of secondary prevention of NOAC and warfarin in ischemic stroke patients with NVAF.. From the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database, we included 16,762 oral anticoagulants-naive acute ischemic stroke patients with NVAF between July 2016 and June 2019. The main outcomes included ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause of death.. In total, 1717 warfarin and 15,025 NOAC users were included in the analysis. After 1:8 propensity score matching, during the observation period, all types of NOACs had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism than warfarin (edoxaban: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.93, rivaroxaban: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96, apixaban: aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91, and dabigatran: aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97). Edoxaban (aHR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96), apixaban (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90), and dabigatran (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) had lower risks of major bleeding and all-cause of death.. All NOACs were more effective than warfarin in the secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications in ischemic stroke patients with NVAF. Except for rivaroxaban, most NOACs demonstrated a lower risk of major bleeding and all-cause of death than warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Two-thirds of users of oral anticoagulants use direct oral anticoagulants, among which increasingly women in their reproductive age. The risk of severe or abnormal menstrual bleeding doubles to 70% when using anticoagulants. With rivaroxaban especially the risk seems higher than with vitamin K antagonists; with dabigatran possibly lower.. We saw a 49-year-old woman who started the oral contraceptive pill because of heavy menstrual bleeding. After getting deep vein thrombosis we stopped the pill and started rivaroxaban. Despite leuproreline the heavy bleeding persisted and 6 blood transfusions were necessary, after which the type of anticoagulant was changed. Eventually, we performed a hysterectomy.. Anticoagulants can cause severe menstrual bleeding, especially in women with a history of heavy menstrual periods. The type of anticoagulant can be changed and the bleeding can be treated by both hormonal and non-hormonal therapies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Menorrhagia; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban

Pharmacokinetic interactions exist between apixaban or rivaroxaban, and CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors such as amiodarone, verapamil and diltiazem. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of exposure to this drug-drug association (DDA) and to assess the bleeding risk associated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. We conducted a cohort study using a representative 1/97. Between 2014 and 2019, the AF population under apixaban or rivaroxaban represented 10,392 patients. During the study period, the annual average prevalence of DDA exposure in this population was 38.9%. Among the 10,392 patients, 223 (2.1%) were hospitalized for bleeding, of which 75 (33.6%) received the association and 148 (66.4%) received apixaban or rivaroxaban alone. There was no association between DDA exposure and risk of hospitalization for bleeding (aHR = 1.19, [95% CI: 0.90, 1.58]). Age (HR 1.03 [1.02, 1.05]) and male gender (HR 1.72 [1.28, 2.30]) were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for bleeding.. Exposure to antiarrhythmic drugs was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for bleeding in patients with AF under rivaroxaban or apixaban.

Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Delivery of Health Care; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Prevalence; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Individual variability of rivaroxaban was observed in clinical application. This study aimed to identify genetic variants associated with the variability of pharmacodynamics and bleeding risk of rivaroxbaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. From June 2017, and July 2019, this study enrolled 257 patients with NVAF receiving rivaroxaban. Pharmacodynamics was assessed by determining anti-Factor Xa (anti-FXa) level 3 h after rivaroxaban administration as peak concentration. Whole-exome sequencing was performed to detected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). This study was registered (NCT03161496).. The bleeding events within 12 months were significantly related to the peak anti-FXa level (p = .027). SUSD3 rs76292544 was associated with 12-month bleeding events (odds ratio [OR]: 4.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.17-8.14, p = 6.43×10. Peak anti-FXa level was associated with risk of bleeding events in patients with NVAF receiving rivaroxaban. SUSD3 rs76292544 was suggestively associated with 12-month bleeding events and five SNPs (NCMAP rs4553122, PRF1 rs885821, PRKAG2 rs12703159, rs13224758 and POU2F3 rs2298579) were suggestively associated with peak anti-FXa level.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban

Antithrombotic therapy is inevitably associated with a risk for bleeding and these bleeding complications can be life-threatening. Recently, specific reversal agents were developed for the direct factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors (DOACs). However, next to the fact that these agents are relatively expensive, the use of selective reversal agents complicates treatment of bleeding patients in practice. In a series of screening experiments, we discovered a class of cyclodextrins with procoagulant properties. In this study we characterize a lead compound, OKL-1111, and demonstrate its potential use as a universal reversal agent.. To assess the anticoagulant reversal properties of OKL-1111, in vitro and in vivo.. The effect of OKL-1111 on coagulation in the absence and presence of DOACs was investigated in a thrombin generation assay. Its reversal effect on a variety of anticoagulants in vivo was investigated in a rat tail cut bleeding model. A possible prothrombotic action of OKL-1111 was assessed in a Wessler model in rabbits.. OKL-1111 concentration-dependently reversed the in vitro anticoagulant effects of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban in the thrombin generation assay. Also in the absence of a DOAC, OKL-1111 concentration-dependently accelerated coagulation in this assay, but did not initiate coagulation. The reversal effect was also seen for all DOACs in the rat tail cut bleeding model. In addition, when tested with other anticoagulants, OKL-1111 also reversed the anticoagulant effect of the vitamin K antagonist warfarin, the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin, the pentasaccharide fondaparinux and the platelet inhibitor clopidogrel in vivo. OKL-1111 did not have prothrombotic effects in the Wessler model.. OKL-1111 is a procoagulant cyclodextrin with a currently unknown working mechanism that has potential to become a universal reversal agent for anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Rabbits; Rats; Rivaroxaban; Thrombin

Amiodarone, the most effective antiarrhythmic drug in atrial fibrillation, inhibits apixaban and rivaroxaban elimination, thus possibly increasing anticoagulant-related risk for bleeding.. For patients receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban, to compare risk for bleeding-related hospitalizations during treatment with amiodarone versus flecainide or sotalol, antiarrhythmic drugs that do not inhibit these anticoagulants' elimination.. Retrospective cohort study.. U.S. Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older.. Patients with atrial fibrillation began anticoagulant use between 1 January 2012 and 30 November 2018 and subsequently initiated treatment with study antiarrhythmic drugs.. Time to event for bleeding-related hospitalizations (primary outcome) and ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and death with or without recent (past 30 days) evidence of bleeding (secondary outcomes), adjusted with propensity score overlap weighting.. There were 91 590 patients (mean age, 76.3 years; 52.5% female) initiating use of study anticoagulants and antiarrhythmic drugs, 54 977 with amiodarone and 36 613 with flecainide or sotalol. Risk for bleeding-related hospitalizations increased with amiodarone use (rate difference [RD], 17.5 events [95% CI, 12.0 to 23.0 events] per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.44 [CI, 1.27 to 1.63]). Incidence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism did not increase (RD, -2.1 events [CI, -4.7 to 0.4 events] per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.80 [CI, 0.62 to 1.03]). The risk for death with recent evidence of bleeding (RD, 9.1 events [CI, 5.8 to 12.3 events] per 1000 person-years; HR, 1.66 [CI, 1.35 to 2.03]) was greater than that for other deaths (RD, 5.6 events [CI, 0.5 to 10.6 events] per 1000 person-years; HR, 1.15 [CI, 1.00 to 1.31]) (HR comparison:. Possible residual confounding.. In this retrospective cohort study, patients aged 65 years or older with atrial fibrillation treated with amiodarone during apixaban or rivaroxaban use had greater risk for bleeding-related hospitalizations than those treated with flecainide or sotalol.. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Topics: Aged; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Flecainide; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Medicare; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Sotalol; Stroke; United States

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE; pulmonary embolism [PE] and/or deep vein thrombosis [DVT]) in Japan is increasing, but relatively small numbers of patients from Japan have been included in studies investigating rivaroxaban (a direct factor Xa inhibitor) for the treatment of VTE and preventing its recurrence.Methods and Results: An open-label, prospective, observational study (XASSENT [NCT02558465]) investigated the safety profile and effectiveness of rivaroxaban for ≤2 years in the treatment of VTE and prevention of its recurrence in Japanese clinical practice. Primary outcomes were major bleeding and symptomatic recurrent VTE. Statistical analyses were exploratory and descriptive. Overall, 2,540 patients were enrolled (safety analysis population [SAP], n=2,387; effectiveness analysis population [EAP], n=2,386). In the SAP, >80% of patients received the approved rivaroxaban dose, the mean (standard deviation) age was 66.6 (15.0) years, ≈74% were >50 kg, and 43% had a creatinine clearance ≥80 mL/min. PE+DVT, PE only, and DVT only were reported in 42%, 8%, and 50% of patients, respectively, and active cancer in 17% of patients. Major bleeding was reported in 69 patients (2.89%; 3.60%/patient-year; SAP) and symptomatic PE/DVT recurrence in 26 patients (1.09%; 1.36%/patient-year; EAP) during the treatment period.. XASSENT provided information on the expected proportions of bleeding and VTE recurrence during rivaroxaban treatment in Japanese clinical practice; no new concerns of safety or effectiveness were found.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Patients with gastrointestinal cancer (GICA) are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Data from randomized clinical trials in cancer-associated VTE suggest that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) conferred similar or superior efficacy but a heterogeneous safety profile in patients with GICA. We compared the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in patients with GICA and VTE at MD Anderson Cancer Center.. This was a retrospective chart review of patients with GICA and VTE receiving treatment with DOACs for a minimum of 6 months. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients experiencing major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and recurrent VTE. Secondary outcomes were time to bleeding and recurrent VTE.. A cohort of 433 patients with GICA who were prescribed apixaban (n = 300), or rivaroxaban (n = 133) were included. MB occurred in 3.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-5.9), CRNMB in 5.3% (95% CI 3.4-7.9), and recurrent VTE in 7.4% (95% CI 5.1-10.3). The cumulative incidence rates of CRNMB and recurrent VTE were not significantly different when comparing apixaban to rivaroxaban.. Apixaban and rivaroxaban had a similar risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding and could be considered as anticoagulant options in selected patients with GICA and VTE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) confers a high risk of thrombosis and bleeding. However, little evidence exists regarding the optimal choice of postoperative thromboprophylaxis in these patients. We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study among adults ≥66 years old with CKD undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty who had filled an outpatient prophylactic anticoagulant prescription between 2010 and 2020 in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcomes of venous thrombosis (VTE) and hemorrhage were identified by validated algorithms using relevant diagnoses and billing codes. Overlap-weighted cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) on the 90-day risk of VTE and hemorrhage compared with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). A total of 27  645 patients were prescribed DOAC (N = 22  943) or LMWH (N = 4702) after arthroplasty. Rivaroxaban was the predominant DOAC (94.5%), while LMWH mainly included enoxaparin (67%) and dalteparin (31.5%). DOAC users had higher eGFRs, fewer co-morbidities, and surgery in more recent years compared to LMWH users. After weighing, DOAC (compared with LMWH) was associated with a lower risk of VTE (DOAC: 1.5% vs. LMWH: 2.1%, weighted hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.94) and a higher risk of hemorrhage (DOAC: 1.3% vs. LMWH: 1.0%, weighted HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.04-1.99). Additional analyses including a more stringent VTE defining algorithm, different eGFR cut-offs, and limiting to rivaroxaban and enoxaparin showed consistent findings. Among elderly adults with CKD, DOAC was associated with a lower VTE risk and a higher hemorrhage risk compared to LMWH following hip or knee arthroplasty.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Ontario; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) may occur without inciting factor or may be secondary to malignancy, surgery, trauma, central venous catheter or related to thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). International guidelines recommend anticoagulant treatment for at least three months, in particular the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). No data on extended anticoagulant therapy and reduced dose of DOACs have been reported in patients affected by UEDVT with persistent thrombotic risk (active cancer, major congenital thrombophilia) or without affected vein recanalization. In our retrospective observational study, including 43 patients, we treated secondary UEDVT with DOACs. In the acute phase of thrombosis (median time of 4 months), we used therapeutic dose of DOACs; the 32 patients with permanent thrombotic risk factors or without recanalization of the UEDVT were shifted to low-dose DOACs (apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily). During therapy with full-dose DOACs, 1 patient presented recurrence of thrombosis; no thromboembolic events were observed during treatment with low-dose DOACs. During full-dose treatment, 3 patients presented minor hemorrhagic complications; no hemorrhagic events were observed during DOACs at low dose. We think our preliminary data could support the indication to extend the anticoagulation with dose reduction of DOACs in patients affected by UEDVT and no-transient thrombotic risk. These data should be confirmed in randomized controlled prospective study.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

The effectiveness and tolerability of a reduced dose (110 mg) of dabigatran versus the standard dose (150 mg) were evaluated in subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high bleeding risk.. Eligible patients were adults with AF and a creatinine clearance rate ≥30 mL/min who were initiated on treatment with dabigatran (index) between 2016 and 2018. High-bleeding-risk subgroups were identified: (1) age ≥80 years; (2) moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance rate 30-<50 mL/min); and (3) recent bleeding or a HAS-BLED score of ≥3. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard regression models with inverse probability of treatment weights were used to investigate associations between dabigatran dose and three outcomes: stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding requiring hospitalization, and all-cause mortality.. Among 7858 patients with AF and a high bleeding risk (age ≥80 years, 3472; moderate renal impairment, 1574; recent bleeding or HAS-BLED score ≥3, 2812), 32.3% received reduced-dose dabigatran. Compared with the standard dose, use of the reduced dose of dabigatran was not associated with an increased risk for stroke or systemic embolism but was associated with a lower risk for major bleeding (HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.95) and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.92) in patients aged ≥80 years. The use of reduced-dose dabigatran was associated with a lower risk for major bleeding (HR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.95) and all-cause mortality among patients with moderate renal impairment (HR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40-0.71).. Lower risks for bleed and mortality associated with reduced- versus standard-dose dabigatran in patients with AF and a high bleeding risk suggest a better dosing strategy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Diabetes represents a pro-thrombotic condition.. The primary objective was to evaluate the effects of Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, newly diagnosed. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effects on the risk of bleeding.. We enrolled 300 patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation. One hundred and sixteen patients were taking warfarin, 31 acenocumarol, 22 dabigatran, 80 rivaroxaban, 34 apixaban, and 17 edoxaban. We evaluated: anthropometric parameters, glycated hemoglobin (HbA. We did not record any differences among nondiabetic patients between VKA and DOACs. However, when we considered diabetic patients, we found a slight, but significant improvement of triglycerides and SD-LDL. As regards incidence of bleeding, minor bleeding was more frequent in VKA diabetic group compared to DOACs diabetic group; furthermore, the incidence of major bleeding was higher with VKA in nondiabetic and diabetic group, compared to patients with DOACs. Among DOACs, we recorded a higher incidence of bleeding (minor and major) with dabigatran compared to rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban in nondiabetic and diabetic patients.. DOACs seem to be metabolically favourable in diabetic patients. Regarding incidence of bleeding, DOACs with the exception of dabigatran, seem better than VKA in diabetic patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Diabetes Mellitus; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

An increasing number of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with life-threatening bleeding are using oral anticoagulants, such as warfarin, Factor IIa and Factor Xa inhibitors. Achieving rapid and controlled haemostasis is critically important to save the patient's life. This multidisciplinary consensus paper provides a systematic and pragmatic approach to the management of anticoagulated patients with severe bleeding at the ED. Repletion and reversal management of the specific anticoagulants is described in detail. For patients on vitamin K antagonists, the administration of vitamin K and repletion of clotting factors with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate provides real-time ability to stop the bleeding. For patients using a direct oral anticoagulant, specific antidotes are necessary to reverse the anticoagulative effect. For patients receiving the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, treatment with idarucizamab has been demonstrated to reverse the hypocoagulable state. For patients receiving a factor Xa inhibitor (apixaban or rivaroxaban), andexanet alfa is the indicated antidote in patients with major bleeding. Lastly, specific treatment strategies are discussed in patients using anticoagulants with major traumatic bleeding, intracranial haemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Blood Coagulation; Emergency Service, Hospital; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K

Hemorrhage is a potential and serious adverse drug reaction, especially for geriatric patients with long-term administration of rivaroxaban. It is essential to establish an effective model for predicting bleeding events, which could improve the safety of rivaroxaban use in clinical practice.. The hemorrhage information of 798 geriatric patients (over the age of 70 years) who needed long-term administration of rivaroxaban for anticoagulation therapy was constantly tracked and recorded through a well-established clinical follow-up system. Relying on the 27 collected clinical indicators of these patients, conventional logistic regression analysis, random forest and XGBoost-based machine learning approaches were applied to analyze the hemorrhagic risk factors and establish the corresponding prediction models. Furthermore, the performance of the models was tested and compared by the area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.. A total of 112 patients (14.0%) had bleeding adverse events after treatment with rivaroxaban for more than 3 months. Among them, 96 patients had gastrointestinal and intracranial hemorrhage during treatment, which accounted for 83.18% of the total hemorrhagic events. The logistic regression, random forest and XGBoost models were established with AUCs of 0.679, 0.672 and 0.776, respectively. The XGBoost model showed the best predictive performance in terms of discrimination, accuracy and calibration among all the models.. An XGBoost-based model with good discrimination and accuracy was built to predict the hemorrhage risk of rivaroxaban, which will facilitate individualized treatment for geriatric patients.

Topics: Aged; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Long-Term Care; Machine Learning; Rivaroxaban

Anticoagulants are essential in preventing and treating thrombosis. Unfortunately, their use is accompanied by an enhanced risk of bleeding. Since the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), the risk of major bleeding has been reduced but not eliminated. Major bleeding events related to the use of factor Xa inhibitors can be challenging to manage. In recent years, four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates have been used in patients with severe bleeding taking oral direct factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban). Andexanet alfa (OndexxyaTM, AstraZeneca AG) is a specially designed recombinant version of human factor Xa that acts as a decoy receptor to reverse the effects of factor Xa inhibitors. Since 2 December 2020, andexanet alfa has been used in Switzerland for adult patients receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban when reversal of anticoagulation is required because of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. However, the use of andexanet alfa remains a challenge owing to its cost, the reported thrombotic complications and the fact that its efficacy mainly relates to intracranial haemorrhage. Moreover, the use of nonspecific reversal agents together with andexanet alfa is controversial. The present recommendations on the use of andexanet alfa in the management of bleeding in patients on factor Xa inhibitors in Switzerland were developed by a group of Swiss experts from the Working Party Hemostasis of the Swiss Society of Hematology. These recommendations aim to provide support to clinicians in their decision-making in the management of patients with major bleeding receiving factor Xa inhibitors.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Switzerland

Quantification of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) plasma levels can guide clinical management, but insight into clinical scenarios surrounding DOAC-calibrated anti-FXa assays is limited.. Apixaban- and rivaroxaban-calibrated chromogenic anti-Xa assays performed over a 1-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, DOAC history, concomitant medications, and renal/liver comorbidities were obtained. Indications for testing and associated clinical actions were reviewed. Machine learning (ML) models predicting clinical actions were evaluated.. In total, 371 anti-FXa apixaban and 89 anti-FXa rivaroxaban tests were performed for 259 and 67 patients in recurring urgent (acute bleeding, unplanned procedures) and nonurgent situations, including several scenarios not captured by existing testing recommendations (eg, drug monitoring, recurrent thromboembolic events, bleeding tendency). In urgent settings, andexanet reversal was guided by radiologic and clinical findings over DOAC levels in 14 of 32 instances, while 51% of apixaban patients qualified for nonreversal strategies through the availability of levels. Levels also informed procedure/intervention timing and supported management decisions when DOAC clearance or DOAC target levels were in question. The importance of clinical context was emphasized by exploratory ML models predicting particular clinical actions.. Although clinical situations are complex, DOAC testing facilitates clinical decision-making, including reversal, justifying more widespread implementation of these assays.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

To compare the risk of readmissions for major bleeding within one year between apixaban and rivaroxaban as a component of triple antithrombotic therapy.. This study was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study conducted at two academic medical centers in the Western New York and New York City region between July 1, 2011 and September 25, 2019. Adult patients were included if they were diagnosed with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism and discharged on new triple antithrombotic therapy. The primary outcome compared the rates of 1-year readmission for major bleeding between apixaban and rivaroxaban groups. Secondary outcomes included rate of ischemic outcomes. Time to event analysis was determined with a Kaplan-Meier plot and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR).. A total of 378 patients were included in the study, 212 in the apixaban group and 166 in the rivaroxaban group. Within 1 year, readmission for major bleeding events occurred in six (2.8%) patients in the apixaban group and four (2.4%) patients in the rivaroxaban group ( P  = 1.000). After adjustment, the major bleeding event rate was not statistically significantly different between apixaban and rivaroxaban [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-3.77; P  = 0.6624]. Higher albumin levels were identified to be protective against major bleeding related readmission events (aHR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.63; P  = 0.0072). The ischemic outcome occurred in seven (3.3%) patients in the apixaban group and three (1.8%) in the rivaroxaban group ( P  = 0.7368).. Use of apixaban or rivaroxaban in a triple antithrombotic regimen was not associated with bleeding or ischemic outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Safety data for different anticoagulant medications in venous thromboembolism (VTE) are scarce, in particular for extended treatment.. To compare major bleeding rates depending on the choice of anticoagulation during initial (first 6 months) and extended treatment (6 months up to 5 years).. A nationwide register-based study including cancer-free patients with a first-time VTE between 2014 and 2020. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare bleeding rates.. We included 6558 patients on warfarin, 18,196 on rivaroxaban, and 19,498 on apixaban. At 6 months, 4750 (72.4%) remained on warfarin, 11,366 (62.5%) on rivaroxaban, and 11,940 (61.2%) on apixaban. During initial treatment, major bleeding rates were 3.86 (95% CI 3.14-4.58), 2.93 (2.55-3.31), and 1.95 (1.65-2.25) per 100 patient-years for warfarin, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively, yielding adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.71-1.12) for rivaroxaban versus warfarin, 0.55 (0.43-0.71) for apixaban versus warfarin, and 0.62 (0.50-0.76) for apixaban versus rivaroxaban. During extended treatment, major bleeding rates were 1.55 (1.19-1.91), 1.05 (0.85-1.26), and 0.96 (0.78-1.15) per 100 patient-years for warfarin, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively, with aHRs of 0.72 (0.53-0.99) for rivaroxaban versus warfarin, 0.60 (0.44-0.82) for apixaban versus warfarin, and 0.85 (0.64-1.12) for apixaban versus rivaroxaban. Previous bleeding and increasing age were risk factors for bleeding both during initial and extended treatment.. Apixaban had a lower bleeding risk than warfarin or rivaroxaban during initial treatment. During extended treatment, bleeding risk was similar for apixaban and rivaroxaban, and higher with warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) agents, such as rivaroxaban, treat and prevent venous thrombosis. Although adrenal hemorrhage due to DOACs has previously been reported, this is a rare condition that can present as an emergency. In this case report, we present a 65-year-old man who recently had bilateral knee arthroplasty and was started on rivaroxaban 10 mg daily for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis following the surgery. CASE REPORT Ten days after bilateral knee arthroplasty and starting rivaroxaban, the patient presented to the Emergency Department with severe, sudden abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography detected significantly enlarged bilateral adrenals, with ill-defined heterogeneous density extending to the upper part of perinephric and paranephric spaces, suggesting bilateral adrenal hemorrhage. A cosyntropin stimulation test was used to confirm the suspicion of adrenal insufficiency. Cortisol levels were 66 nmol/L before stimulation and 83 nmol/L 60 min after cosyntropin administration. Hydrocortisone was started intravenously at a dose of 50 mg every 8 h. After his symptoms improved, he was discharged on oral hydrocortisone at 10 mg in the morning and 5 mg in the evening. Seven weeks after discharge, follow-up abdominal ultrasonography showed that the bilateral adrenal hemorrhage had resolved. CONCLUSIONS This case supports previous cases of adrenal hemorrhage as a rare but serious association with rivaroxaban and highlights the importance of rapid diagnosis using imaging and monitoring of patients for this possible adverse effect. Practitioners must remain vigilant when prescribing anticoagulation therapy, especially in patients who are at an increased risk for adrenal hemorrhage.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Cosyntropin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Male; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thrombosis

Apixaban is a direct-acting oral anticoagulant that selectively inhibits factor Xa. Reversal strategies utilized to treat factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding include andexanet alfa, prothrombin complex -concentrate (PCC), and activated PCC (aPCC). The optimal treatment of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in the setting of an apixaban overdose is unknown.. This case report describes a 69-year-old female who initially presented to an emergency department at a community hospital due to a ground-level fall with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. The patient reportedly ingested apixaban 275 mg, carvedilol 250 mg, atorvastatin 1,200 mg, and unknown amounts of amlodipine and ethanol. Anti-inhibitor coagulant complex, an aPCC, was administered approximately 3 hours after presentation. Initial thromboelastography performed approximately 4 hours after presentation showed a prolonged reaction time of 16.8 minutes. Ongoing imaging and evidence of coagulopathy prompted repeated aPCC administration to a cumulative dose of approximately 100 U/kg. The patient underwent craniotomy with hematoma evacuation. Postoperative imaging showed expansion of the existing intracranial hemorrhage and new areas of hemorrhage. Andexanet alfa was administered approximately 18 hours after presentation, followed by repeat craniotomy with evacuation of the hematoma. No further expansion of the intracranial hemorrhage was observed, and the reaction time on thromboelastography was normalized at 6.3 minutes.. This case suggests that andexanet alfa may have a role in the management of traumatic hemorrhage in the setting of an acute massive apixaban overdose. Use of andexanet alfa, PCC, and aPCC in this context requires further research.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Drug Overdose; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hematoma; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhage, Traumatic; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent the cornerstone therapy for cardioembolic events prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). In practice, the choice of one DOAC over another is guided by the decision-making process of the physician, which considers specific patient and drug characteristics. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features and long-term outcomes of a real-world population treated with DOACs, where the use of the 4 different DOACs is quite equal. We conducted a retrospective observational, single-center, multidisciplinary study enrolling consecutive NVAF patients treated with one of the 4 DOACs. From an initial number of 753 patients, we excluded 72 patients because of loss to follow-up, at the end we enrolled 681:174 (23%) treated with dabigatran, 175 (23%) with apixaban, 190 (25%) with rivaroxaban, and 214 (29%) with edoxaban. Patients treated with apixaban were significantly older, more women represented (p <0.001), and with a higher cardioembolic and bleeding risk (p <0.001). Dabigatran was preferred in patients with liver failure (p = 0.008), whereas Apixaban and Edoxaban were chosen in chronic kidney disease (p = 0.002). At 3-year follow-up, 20 patients (2.7%) experienced a systemic thromboembolic event without significant differences in the 4 DOACs. In the same period, an International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis classification major bleeding event occurred in 26 patients (3.6%), more statistically correlated to edoxaban (6.1%) (p = 0.038). Thromboembolic events or major bleeding were higher in the edoxaban group (10%) compared with the others (p = 0.014). In our single-center real-world experience, the choice of the DOAC for a patient with NVAF was tailored to specific clinical features and drug pharmacokinetics of the patient. As a result, a small number of adverse events were observed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) can affect different organ systems, including the heart and adrenal glands. Despite being known for its prothrombotic characteristics, APS can have serious bleeding complications. Occasionally, thrombotic and bleeding episodes can present simultaneously in an APS patient. Whenever these events co-occur, resuming anticoagulation becomes a topic of debate. As such, we present the case of a 43-year-old male with triple positive antiphospholipid antibodies, indicating APS, who presented with chest pain. Anticoagulants were switched one month before presentation from warfarin to a direct oral anticoagulant, rivaroxaban. Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, as well as new-onset left-sided adrenal hemorrhage, were diagnosed. The patient developed adrenal insufficiency; therefore, corticosteroids were administered, and warfarin was resumed to prevent further thrombotic episodes.

Topics: Adult; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

The 2021 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis' (ISTH) recommends standard doses of apixaban and rivaroxaban regardless of high body mass index (BMI) and weight, but had not compare DOACs head-to-head in obesity or address underweight patients.. Our aim is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs in underweight and obese patients compared to warfarin. The primary endpoints include incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events. Descriptive statistics was used for continuous variables. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the four-groups for continuous measures and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to analyze categorical data. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, was used for categorical variables, and the Mann-Whitney test (the non-parametric counterpart to the two-sample t-test) for continuous data.. Of 2940 patients receiving anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment or atrial fibrillation (AF), 492 met eligibility criteria. Within each group, 248 patients received warfarin, 101 received apixaban, 100 received rivaroxaban and 43 received dabigatran. Patients were characterized in 4 body mass index (BMI) categories, in which 80 were underweight and 412 were obese.. When each DOAC was compared to warfarin in rates of VTE, apixaban showed statistically significant lower rate of VTE (p = 0.0149). However, no statistical significance was identified in the rate of VTE between DOACs combined vs. warfarin (p = 0.1529). When each DOAC was compared to warfarin, apixaban showed the lowest rate of overall bleeding (p = 0.0194). However, no statistical difference in the rate of bleeding was observed between DOACs combined vs. warfarin (p = 0.3284). Patients with extreme body weights requiring anticoagulation for VTE and AF may safety benefit from DOAC therapy. This evaluation showed apixaban with the lowest rate of VTE and bleeding compared to warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran. These results provide experience for the clinician to use DOACs, particularly apixaban, in underweight and obese populations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thinness; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been becoming prevalent in recent years and are increasingly used in the treatment of port vein thrombosis. The difference of the efficacy and safety between rivaroxaban and dabigatran remains unclear in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT).. This retrospective study included all consecutive cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis in our institute from January 2020 to December 2021. The patients received oral anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. The demographic, clinical, and imaging data of patients were collected. The diagnosis of acute PVT was confirmed by imaging examinations. The severity of liver cirrhosis was assessed using Child-Pugh score and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Outcomes included recanalization (complete, partial, and persistent occlusion), liver function, bleedings, and survival. The log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier distributions of time-to-event outcomes. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. A total of 94 patients were included, 52 patients (55%) received rivaroxaban and 42 (45%) with dabigatran. The complete and partial recanalization of PVT was observed in 41 patients. There was no significant difference in complete recanalization, partial recanalization, and persistent occlusion between the two groups. With multivariate analysis, D-dimer (HR 1.165, 95% CI 1.036-1.311, p = 0.011) was independent predictors of complete recanalization. The Child-Pugh score (p = 0.001) was significantly improved in both two groups after anticoagulation, respectively. However, there was no difference between the two groups. The probability of survival was 94%, 95% in the rivaroxaban and dabigatran groups (log-rank p = 0.830). Major bleedings were reported in 3 patients (6%) in rivaroxaban group and 1 patient (2%) in dabigatran group (p = 0.646). Six patients (12%) in rivaroxaban group experienced minor bleeding, and five (12%) from dabigatran group (p = 0.691).. The efficacy and safety were comparable between rivaroxaban and dabigatran in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis. And D-dimer can contribute to the prediction of PVT recanalization in cirrhotic patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; End Stage Liver Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Portal Vein; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

We previously conducted a retrospective cohort study using chart review of oral anticoagulant-naïve Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) that assessed the risk of major bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism (SE) events of apixaban versus warfarin.. In this subgroup analysis, we compared the risk of major bleeding and stroke/SE events by stratifying patients into four subgroups matched 1:1 using propensity score matching (PSM) according to baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl; mL/min): ≥ 15 to < 30, ≥ 30 to < 50, ≥ 50 to < 80, and ≥ 80.. Of the 7074 patients in the apixaban group and 4998 in the warfarin group eligible for inclusion in the analysis, 4385 were included in each group after PSM. Incidence rates of major bleeding and stroke/SE events were generally lower with apixaban versus warfarin across the CrCl subgroups. When all patients with a CrCl change of < 0 mL/min per year during the study period (apixaban, n = 3871; warfarin, n = 2635) were stratified into four subgroups based on the magnitude of CrCl decline (median CrCl change [mL/min] per year: - 1.09, - 3.48, - 7.54, and - 36.92 for apixaban, and - 1.10, - 3.65, - 7.85, and - 40.40 for warfarin), the incidence rates of major bleeding and stroke/SE events generally increased with an increasing CrCl decline per year in both groups.. In Japanese patients with NVAF, the safety and effectiveness of apixaban and warfarin were consistent across different renal subgroups, including those with severe renal impairment. Our results highlight the importance of monitoring renal function variations over time in patients with NVAF.. NCT03765242.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; East Asian People; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The use of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) to treat direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated bleeding is off-label and clinical experience is limited.. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of aPCC in reversing the anticoagulant effect of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients presenting with major bleeding.. A retrospective cohort study of adult non-randomized patients was conducted at a tertiary referral medical center in the United States (US) to investigate the use of aPCC for the reversal of the anticoagulant effect of apixaban and rivaroxaban in patients presenting with major bleeding. The primary outcome was achieving clinical hemostasis according to prespecified criteria. Safety outcomes included the occurrence of thrombotic events during hospitalization.. A total of 217 patients were included in the study. Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) was the most common site of bleeding (n = 100, 46.1%), followed by gastrointestinal bleed (n = 87, 40.1%). Clinical hemostasis was achieved in 170 patients (78.3%), and the risk of not achieving hemostasis with ICH-related bleeding was significantly higher than that of non-ICH-related bleeding (2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-4.34; p < 0.001). Eight patients not achieving hemostasis died during hospitalization, all of whom were suffering from ICH, and mortality associated with non-ICH-related bleeding was significantly lower compared with ICH-related bleeding (0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.97; p < 0.001). Thromboembolic events during hospitalization occurred in one patient (0.5%).. The use of aPCC for the management of apixaban- or rivaroxaban-related major bleeding is effective in most cases and is associated with a low risk of thromboembolism.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism

Background Dose reduction of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) medications is inconsistently applied to older adults with multiple morbidities, potentially due to perceived harms and unknown benefits of standard dosing. Methods and Results Using 2013 to 2017 US Medicare claims linked to Minimum Data Set records, we conducted a retrospective cohort study. We identified DOAC initiators (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) aged ≥65 years with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation residing in a nursing home. We estimated inverse-probability of treatment weights for DOAC dose using propensity scores. We examined safety (hospitalization for major bleeding) and effectiveness outcomes (all-cause mortality, thrombosis [myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, venous thromboembolism]). We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs using cause-specific hazard-regression models. Of 21 878 DOAC initiators, 48% received reduced dosing. The mean age of residents was 82.0 years, 66% were female, and 31% had moderate/severe cognitive impairment. After estimating inverse-probability of treatment weights, standard dosing was associated with a higher rate of bleeding (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.03-1.37]; 9.4 versus 8.0 events per 100 person-years). Standard-dose therapy was associated with the highest rates of bleeding among those aged >80 years (9.1 versus 6.7 events per 100 person-years) and with a body mass index <30 kg/m

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medicare; Morbidity; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients suffer a high risk of major cardiovascular (CV) events, with athero-thrombo-embolism as the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism. Recently, two large randomized clinical trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose rivaroxaban twice daily plus aspirin in stable PAD outpatients and those immediately after peripheral revascularization. We sought to determine if the effects of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin compared to aspirin alone are consistent across this broad spectrum of PAD patients.. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of the COMPASS and VOYAGER randomized trials among 11 560 PAD patients (4996 from COMPASS and 6564 from VOYAGER) in the primary analysis and 9332 (2768 from COMPASS and 6564 from VOYAGER) with lower extremity (LE)-PAD in the secondary analysis. The hazard ratio (HR) for the composite of CV death, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, acute limb ischaemia, or major vascular amputation was 0.79 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.65-0.95) comparing low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin to aspirin alone. While the risk of major bleeding was increased with low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin compared to aspirin alone [HR: 1.51 (95% CI: 1.22-1.87)], there was no significant increase in severe bleeding [HR: 1.18 (95% CI: 0.79-1.76)]. Similar effects were observed in the subset with symptomatic LE-PAD.. Among PAD patients, low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin is superior to aspirin alone in reducing CV and limb outcomes including acute limb ischaemia and major vascular amputation. This reduction is offset by a relative increase in major bleeding, but not by an excess of fatal or critical organ bleeding. The consistency of findings of these trials supports the use of combination low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin in PAD patients across a broad spectrum of disease.

Topics: Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Patients with pelvic trauma are at high risk of thromboembolic complications, but effective methods of prophylaxis are still to be accepted widely. The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been reported to be as high as 61%, which represents the commonest cause of morbidity and mortality in this cohort. New oral anticoagulants are now available and may be used instead of LMWH injections for extended prophylaxis. Rivaroxaban has not been comprehensively considered in the previous pelvic and acetabular trauma literature, but its known benefits include increased patient compliance, especially in the minority of patients who are unable to self-administer injections, and that it does not require monitoring.. All patients referred to our pelvic trauma service between 2015 and 2020 were considered for this study, exclusion criteria involved those patients who had contraindications to rivaroxaban, those who were referred to our service but were never managed at our centre and those managed by other teams (e.g. neurosurgery). Operative patients were initially managed with LMWH until 24 h post-operatively when they started rivaroxaban. Conservatively managed patients started Rivaroxaban straight away. Data were collected on demographics, injury mechanism, fracture classification and clinically relevant VTE and bleeding events up until 3 months post discharge.. The overall incidence of VTE was 2%. These represented 3 DVTs and 3 PEs, and occurred in patients who were managed operatively. No major bleeding events were observed. There were two minor bleeding events, both occurring in patients who were managed conservatively with rivaroxaban alone, and they did not require further intervention. 90% of patients surveyed expressed preference for oral prophylaxis. Reported compliance with rivaroxaban was 100%.. Our data show that this VTE regimen protocol is safe and effective in this group of injured patients and is at least non-inferior to the standard prophylaxis of LMWH alone.

Topics: Aftercare; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Patient Discharge; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors (FxaIs) are renally eliminated; thus, acute kidney injury (AKI) may increase the risk for drug accumulation and bleeding. There is minimal data describing the effects of AKI on FxaI anti-Xa levels or clinical outcomes.. To compare anti-Xa level monitoring with standard monitoring in patients who experience AKI on apixaban or rivaroxaban.. This retrospective study included patients admitted within a large hospital system from May 2016 to October 2020. Patients were included if they received apixaban or rivaroxaban prior to AKI. Patients were stratified into 1 of 2 groups: those with anti-Xa level monitoring or those who received standard monitoring. The primary outcome was major bleeding as defined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.. A total of 196 patients were included in the final analysis. Major bleeding occurred in 2 patients who received anti-Xa level monitoring, compared with 14 patients who received standard monitoring (2.1% vs 14%;. This is the first study to demonstrate that anti-Xa level monitoring was associated with a significant reduction in major bleeding compared with standard monitoring in patients with AKI who received apixaban or rivaroxaban. The optimal management of antithrombotic medications in patients with AKI and recent exposure to an FxaI requires further investigation.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Clinical models such as the HAS-BLED (standing for Hypertension, Abnormal liver/renal function, Stroke history, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drug/alcohol usage) were developed to predict risk of major bleeding on vitamin K antagonists/antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to develop a model that will improve the ability to predict major bleeding events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with new oral anticoagulants (NOACs).. Clalit Health Services is the largest of four integrated healthcare organisations in Israel, which insures 4.7 million patients (53% of the population). We identified in Clalit Health Services all patients with AF, new users of an NOAC (2013-2017), and followed them until first occurrence of a major bleeding event, death, switch to another oral anticoagulant, 30 days after discontinuation of NOAC or end of follow-up (31 December 2019). Importance of the candidate model variables was estimated by inclusion frequencies across forward selection algorithm applied to 50 bootstrap samples. Then, backward selection algorithm using the modified Bayesian Information Criterion for competing risks was applied to select predictors for the final model.. We present a novel and simple risk score for prediction of major bleeding in patients with non-valvular AF treated with NOACs. Validation in additional cohorts is warranted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Clinical trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) to warfarin excluded patients with a history of bariatric surgery. The anatomic changes from bariatric procedures have several effects on drug absorption which can have serious consequences for these patients. We sought to describe real-world use of DOACs among adults that had a history of bariatric surgery or underwent a bariatric surgery while receiving a DOAC. We conducted a retrospective case series of adult patients, at a large academic medical center, who initiated any DOAC in 2016 thru 2019 and had a history of bariatric surgery or underwent a bariatric surgery while receiving a DOAC. Thrombotic and bleeding events were described using summary statistics and bleeding severity was described using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria of having bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy or gastric band) and receiving a DOAC. Twenty (71.4%) were prescribed apixaban and eight (28.6%) were prescribed rivaroxaban. Seven patients (25%) experienced at least one clinically relevant non-major bleeding event, including one patient (3.6%) that had a major bleeding event. Two patients (7.1%) had a thromboembolic event. Coagulation laboratory studies were infrequently performed at the time of the bleeding or clotting events. Among patients with a history of bariatric surgery, use of DOACs were commonly associated with clinically relevant non-major bleeding events and less commonly associated with major bleeding and thromboembolic events. Larger studies may offer further insight into the overall safety and efficacy of DOAC therapy in patients that have undergone bariatric surgery. The specific role of coagulation laboratory studies warrants further evaluation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bariatric Surgery; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis

Studies have shown that patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who discontinue oral anticoagulants (OACs) are at higher risk of complications such as stroke.. This analysis compared the risk of non-persistence with OACs among patients with NVAF.. Adult patients with NVAF who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin were identified using 01JAN2013-30JUN2019 data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and four US commercial claims databases. Non-persistence was defined as discontinuation (no evidence of index OAC use for ≥ 60 days from the last days' supply) or switch to another OAC. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to illustrate time to non-persistence along with cumulative incidences of non-persistence. Baseline and time-varying covariates were evaluated, and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate non-persistence risk.. In total, 363,823 patients receiving apixaban, 57,121 receiving dabigatran, 282,831 receiving rivaroxaban, and 317,337 receiving warfarin were included. Of these, 47-72% discontinued/switched OAC therapy within an average 9-month follow-up. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence than were dabigatran (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.62), rivaroxaban (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.75-0.76), and warfarin (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.74-0.75). Dabigatran was associated with a higher risk of non-persistence than were warfarin (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.19-1.22) and rivaroxaban (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.22-1.25), and rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence than was warfarin (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.98). Clinical events (stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding [MB]) during follow-up were predictors of non-persistence (stroke HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.53-1.61; MB HR 2.96; 95% CI 2.92-3.00).. In over one million patients with NVAF, our results suggest differences in anticoagulation treatment persistence across OAC agents, even after accounting for clinical events after OAC initiation. It is important for clinicians and patients to take these differences into consideration, especially as non-persistence to OAC therapy is associated with thromboembolic complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban, as a novel oral anticoagulant agent, emerged in thrombosis management. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily rivaroxaban versus dose-adjusted warfarin for cerebral venous thrombosis treatment in a real-world clinical setting. This is a prospective cohort study based on the real-world clinical data analysis of the patients with imaging-confirmed CVT enrolled from August 2016 through January 2020 and their outcomes were followed up. Patients were grouped according to their treatment strategies: rivaroxaban (15-20 mg daily) or warfarin (dosage-adjusted according to international normalized ratio), which were matched 1:2 on the propensity score. The primary efficacy outcome was recanalization assessed by magnetic resonance venography. Thrombus burden, CVT recurrence and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were also compared. The safety outcome was major bleeding. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 33 patients in rivaroxaban group and 49 in warfarin group after propensity score matching. During 6-month (median) follow-up, 29 patients (87.9%) in rivaroxaban group and 38 patients (77.6%) in warfarin group obtained recanalization (OR, 1.44; 95% CI 0.63-3.30). The thrombus reduction at the 6-month follow-up did not reach statistical difference (p = 0.118). No CVT recurrence was observed in both groups. All patients in rivaroxaban group obtained favorable functional outcomes (mRS = 0-2), whereas in warfarin group, 1 patient remained physically disable (mRS = 3) at the follow-up. No major bleeding events occurred in two groups. Rivaroxaban might have the same or stronger efficacy in facilitating CVT recanalization and preventing CVT recurrence with a lower incidence of bleeding than that of warfarin in Chinese population.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Thrombosis; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Anticoagulant therapy is suggested within 45 days after Watchman device implantation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A previous study demonstrated that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were a feasible peri- and postprocedural alternative to warfarin. The present study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of using different anticoagulants (low-dose NOACs vs. warfarin) within 45 days after Watchman device implantation in a Chinese population.. Patients with successful Watchman device implantation from October 2014 to June 2020 were included. All patients received anticoagulants within 45 days after the procedure, and those patients were divided into three groups according to the type of postprocedural anticoagulants. Transesophageal echocardiography follow-up was performed 45 days post procedure to assess residual flow and the occurrence of device-related thrombus (DRT).. A total of 368 patients were enrolled in the study. The study population was divided into three groups: the warfarin group (n = 77), the dabigatran group (n = 165) and the rivaroxaban group (n = 126). Periprocedural major bleeding was higher in the warfarin group (2.6% vs. 0% vs. 0%, P = 0.043), while minor bleeding was comparable among the groups (3.9% vs. 1.2% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.230). No periprocedural transient ischemic attack/stroke occurred. At follow-up, the incidence of DRT was higher in the warfarin group than in the other groups (4.2% vs. 0.6% vs. 0.8%; P = 0.116), but the difference was not statistically significant. The rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events were similar in the three groups.. The safety and efficacy of low-dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban were comparable to those of warfarin within 45 days after Watchman device implantation in a Chinese population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The present observational study aimed to clarify the association between bridging therapy with heparin before starting rivaroxaban and clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).Methods and Results: Patients with NVAF who experienced acute ischemic stroke or TIA of the middle cerebral artery territory and started rivaroxaban within 30 days after onset were enrolled and were followed up for 90 days. Outcome measures were ischemic events, major bleeding, their composite, and death or disability 90 days after onset. Ischemic events were defined as ischemic stroke, TIA, and systemic embolism. Of 1,308 analyzed patients, 638 received bridging therapy with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin with a median of 10,000 IU/day. Associations between bridging therapy and ischemic events or major bleeding were not statistically significant individually, but the association between bridging therapy and their composite was statistically significant (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.29). The association between bridging therapy and death or disability 90 days after onset was not statistically significant.. The composite of ischemic events and major bleeding was more frequent in patients with NVAF who received bridging therapy with low-dose heparin than in those who started treatment directly with rivaroxaban after ischemic stroke or TIA.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Ischemic Stroke; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Rivaroxaban is an oral anticoagulant that inhibits thrombin and blocks coagulation cascade through directly inactivating factors Xa. Despite rivaroxaban is widely used for prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis, and its common adverse reactions have been reported, including abnormal coagulation, mucosal hemorrhage, hematuria, and intracranial hemorrhage. To explore potential drivers of individual differences in adverse reactions induced by rivaroxaban, we performed whole-exome sequencing and found that AKR7A3 rs1738023/rs1738025 and ABCA6 rs7212506 are susceptible sites for rivaroxaban-related bleeding in aged patients treated with rivaroxaban. Gene functional annotation and signaling pathway enrichment indicated that homozygous mutations in AKR7A3 and ABCA6 might alter normal rivaroxaban transport and metabolism, and lead to continuous accumulation of activated drugs and toxic substances in vivo. Our results suggested that interindividual differences in bleeding events induced by rivaroxaban may be potentially driven by genetic alterations related to abnormal metabolism and transport of rivaroxaban.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thrombosis

Bleeding safety in relation to use of systemic fluconazole and topical azoles among patients with atrial fibrillation treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran is insufficiently explored, despite clinical relevance and several reports suggesting associations.. Using nationwide Danish registers, we identified patients with atrial fibrillation initiated on apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran from 2012-2018. We investigated associations between bleeding incidents and systemic fluconazole or topical azole treatment using a case-crossover design with 30-day exposure windows and reported odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).. We included 32,340 (36%), 32,409 (36%), and 24,940 (28%) patients initiated on apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Patients on apixaban were older (median age: 77 years; interquartile range [IQR] 70-84) compared with rivaroxaban users (median age: 75 years; IQR 68-82) and patients on dabigatran (median age: 73 years; IQR 66-80). Apixaban users had a significantly increased risk of bleeding following exposure to systemic fluconazole: odds ratio (OR) 3.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-10.6. No increased risk was found among rivaroxaban and dabigatran users: ORs of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.2-3.0) and 1.7 (95% CI, 0.5-5.6), respectively. As to bleeding risk pertaining to topical azole exposure among apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran users, no association was found, with corresponding ORs of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.5-1.3); 1.3 (95% CI, 0.9-2.1); and 1.2 (95% CI 0.8-1.8), respectively.. In patients with atrial fibrillation on either apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran, an association between an elevated bleeding risk and use of systemic fluconazole was found among patients on apixaban. We found no increased risk of bleeding following co-exposure to topical azoles.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Azoles; Cross-Over Studies; Dabigatran; Fluconazole; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Decision making for the "best" treatment is particularly challenging in situations in which individual patient response to drugs can largely differ from average treatment effects. By estimating individual treatment effects (ITEs), we aimed to demonstrate how strokes, major bleeding events, and a composite of both could be reduced by model-assisted recommendations for a particular direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC).. In German claims data for the calendar years 2014-2018, we selected 29 901 new users of the DOACs rivaroxaban and apixaban. Random forests considered binary events within 1 y to estimate ITEs under each DOAC according to the X-learner algorithm with 29 potential effect modifiers; treatment recommendations were based on these estimated ITEs. Model performance was evaluated by the c-for-benefit statistics, absolute risk reduction (ARR), and absolute risk difference (ARD) by trial emulation.. A significant proportion of patients would be recommended a different treatment option than they actually received. The stroke model significantly discriminated patients for higher benefit and thus indicated improved decisions by reduced outcomes (c-for-benefit: 0.56; 95% confidence interval [0.52; 0.60]). In the group with apixaban recommendation, the model also improved the composite endpoint (ARR: 1.69 % [0.39; 2.97]). In trial emulations, model-assisted recommendations significantly reduced the composite event rate (ARD: -0.78 % [-1.40; -0.03]).. If prescribers are undecided about the potential benefits of different treatment options, ITEs can support decision making, especially if evidence is inconclusive, risk-benefit profiles of therapeutic alternatives differ significantly, and the patients' complexity deviates from "typical" study populations. In the exemplary case for DOACs and potentially in other situations, the significant impact could also become practically relevant if recommendations were available in an automated way as part of decision making.HighlightsIt was possible to calculate individual treatment effects (ITEs) from routine claims data for rivaroxaban and apixaban, and the characteristics between the groups with recommendation for one or the other option differed significantly.ITEs resulted in recommendations that were significantly superior to usual (observed) treatment allocations in terms of absolute risk reduction, both separately for stroke and in the composite endpoint of stroke and major bleeding.When similar patients from routine data were selected (precision cohorts) for patients with a strong recommendation for one option or the other, those similar patients under the respective recommendation showed a significantly better prognosis compared with the alternative option.Many steps may still be needed on the way to clinical practice, but the principle of decision support developed from routine data may point the way toward future decision-making processes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Machine Learning; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

 Data from clinical trials indicate that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are noninferior and safer than conventional therapy (low-molecular-weight heparin followed by a vitamin K antagonist [VKA]) for treating venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE). This study compared the effectiveness and safety of DOACs and conventional therapy in a real-world setting..  This observational study used French national claims data of adult, treatment-naïve patients diagnosed with VTE (majority PE) who were hospitalized and treated for VTE with a DOAC (apixaban or rivaroxaban) or VKAs during 2013 to 2018. Patients with active cancer were excluded. After propensity score matching for each DOAC-VKA comparison, risks of bleeding, recurrent VTE, and all-cause mortality were compared at 6 months. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios of the endpoints..  A total of 58,137 patients were included (10,775 VKAs, 10,440 apixaban, 36,922 rivaroxaban). Propensity score-matched cohort sizes were 7,503 for apixaban and 9,179 for rivaroxaban. The hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was significantly lower for apixaban than VKAs for bleeding requiring hospitalization (0.43 [0.32-0.59]), all-cause death (0.61 [0.51-0.74]), and first recurrent VTE (0.67 [0.52-0.85]). The hazard ratio was also significantly lower for rivaroxaban than VKAs for all-cause death (0.63 [0.53-0.74]) but not for bleeding requiring hospitalization (0.86 [0.69-1.07]) or first recurrent VTE (0.91 [0.74-1.13])..  Apixaban was associated with superior safety and effectiveness than VKAs. All-cause mortality was lower in both DOACs than VKAs. Our results support recommendations to use DOACs over VKAs for the treatment of VTE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are widely used due to favourable benefit/risk ratio. However, consequences of massive ingestion have been poorly investigated.. We aimed to report outcome and pharmacokinetic parameters in patients who massively ingested DOACs.. We conducted a 5-year cohort study including consecutive massive DOAC ingestion patients admitted to two critical care departments. Patients were managed in accordance with standards of care. We collected the main history, clinical, laboratory, management and outcome data. The time-course of plasma DOAC concentrations measured using specific assays was modelled.. Twelve patients (3F/9M; age, 55 years [41-63], median [25th-75th percentiles]) were included. Ingestions involved rivaroxaban (n = 7), apixaban (n = 3) and dabigatran (n = 2), with presumed doses of 9.4-fold [5.0-22.0] the full daily dose. Six patients received activated charcoal but no antidote nor blood-derived product. No bleeding was observed. One patient died due to refractory cardiogenic shock related to bisoprolol co-intoxication. Highest observed peak plasma concentrations were 1720 ng/ml (rivaroxaban), 750 ng/ml (apixaban) and 644 ng/ml (dabigatran). Times to reach DOAC concentration below 50 ng/ml were ~20-45 h (rivaroxaban), ~125 h (apixaban) and ~30-50 h (dabigatran). Elimination half-lives were 2.5-25.5 h (rivaroxaban), 22.0 and 36.5 h (apixaban), and 5.8 and 15.5 h (dabigatran), with substantial interindividual variability and prolongation in case of cardiovascular failure related to co-intoxicants. Charcoal administration, even if delayed, may have contributed to limit toxicity, possibly by reducing absorption and/or enteroenteric recycling.. No bleeding was observed in this series of massive DOAC ingestions despite elevated plasma concentrations. No patient required specific haemostatic agents. Charcoal administration should be considered to limit toxicity.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Charcoal; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Eating; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent an off-label but potential alternative to traditional therapies for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with a diagnosis of laboratory-confirmed HIT.. A multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult patients with HIT treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran between 1 January 2013 and 1 January 2020 was performed. Patients with an intermediate or high pre-test probability for HIT and a positive antiplatelet factor 4/heparin complex assay, latex immunoturbidimetric assay, or serotonin release assay were included for analysis. The primary outcome was the composite of newly diagnosed venous or arterial thromboembolism, gangrene, or severe limb ischemia requiring amputation at 3 months following DOAC initiation. This study was approved by local institutional review boards, and the requirement for informed consent was waived.. A total of 77 patients from four health systems were included. The median 4Ts score was 5 (interquartile range 4.5-6), and 38 patients (49.4%) had a diagnosis of HIT with thrombosis. The most frequently used DOAC was apixaban (n = 51), followed by rivaroxaban (n = 24) and dabigatran (n = 2). In total, 63 (81.8%) patients received parenteral non-heparin anticoagulation prior to DOAC initiation. Nine patients (11.7%) experienced the primary outcome of HIT-related thrombotic events. Of the 14 patients who exclusively received DOAC therapy, none experienced the primary outcome. Major bleeding occurred in five (6.5%) patients.. In this retrospective cohort study, DOACs were associated with rates of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events similar to those with other therapies currently used in the treatment of HIT.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombosis

To investigate whether co-administration of antiarrhythmic dronedarone and anticoagulant rivaroxaban would increase the risks of hemorrhage after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.. A total of 100 patients with AF who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (CA) in the Department of Cardiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2019-12 to 2020-11 were included. Patients were divided into an oral dronedarone and rivaroxaban group (D-R group, N = 50) and an oral amiodarone and rivaroxaban group (A-R group, N = 50) according to the postoperative antiarrhythmic and anticoagulation strategies. Patients in 2 groups were given propensity score matching (PSM) to obtain a sample with balanced inter-group covariates. A retrospective observational study was conducted. After 3 months of follow-up, the incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), major hemorrhages, and early AF recurrence was observed.. After PSM, 41 patients were included in each group. With similarly distributed baseline characteristics and ablation characteristics after PSM, the CRNMB rate after AF ablation was significantly higher in the D-R group than in the A-R group (26.8% versus 7.3%, P = 0.02), and no major hemorrhages were detected in both groups. No significant difference was observed in the sinus rhythm maintenance rate between the D-R group and the A-R group (26.8% vs. 22.0%, P = 0.43).. Compared to co-administration of amiodarone and rivaroxaban, co-administration of dronedarone and rivaroxaban increases the risk of CRNMB but it does not increase the risk of major hemorrhages in blanking period after AF ablation.

Topics: Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Dronedarone; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban

Current evidence suggests that rivaroxaban may be well tolerated and effective in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and obesity; however, there is limited evidence on the impact of polypharmacy in this population. This study evaluated real-world clinical outcomes with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with NVAF and obesity according to the number of concurrent medications.. This retrospective cohort study identified patients with one or more pharmacy claim for rivaroxaban or warfarin from two large claims databases. Patients were required to have an atrial fibrillation diagnosis, body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m. A total of 95,875 patients were identified with one or more claim for either rivaroxaban or warfarin. After PSM, patient characteristics were balanced between cohorts (n = 21,547 in each cohort). The overall composite risk of stroke and systemic embolism was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban cohort compared with the warfarin cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.84; p < 0.001). The risks of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and systemic embolism separately were also significantly reduced with rivaroxaban. Major bleeding risk was similar between cohorts (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.06; p = 0.2842), and results were consistent across the three polypharmacy groups.. In this real-world study of NVAF patients with obesity, rivaroxaban was associated with lower risks of stroke and systemic embolism and similar risk of major bleeding versus warfarin across polypharmacy categories.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity; Polypharmacy; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

There is limited information directly comparing andexanet alfa (AA) versus four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on apixaban or rivaroxaban.. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of AA versus 4F-PCC in ICH on apixaban or rivaroxaban.. This retrospective, matched, cohort analysis was conducted at a single healthcare system. Patients were matched based on baseline ICH volume. The primary outcome was good or excellent ICH hemostasis, which was defined as a 35% or less increase in ICH volume within 24 h following AA or 4F-PCC administration. The secondary outcome was thrombotic events within 14 days following AA or 4F-PCC administration.. In total, 26 AA and 26 4F-PCC patients were included in this matched cohort analysis. Both groups had comparable rates of good or excellent ICH hemostasis (AA: 92.3% vs. 4F-PCC: 88.5%, p = 1.000). Thrombotic events within 14-days were not significantly different (AA: 26.9% vs. 4F-PCC: 11.5%, p = 0.159).. This study found no significant differences in good or excellent ICH hemostasis within 24-h or new thrombotic events within 14-days in a cohort given AA or 4F-PCC for ICH while on apixaban or rivaroxaban. However, this single-center analysis is underpowered due to sample size constraints, therefore further high-quality research comparing AA safety and effectiveness versus 4F-PCC is needed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Polypharmacy, including use of inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), is common in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and is associated with increased bleeding.. In 8246 patients included in the EINSTEIN-VTE studies for acute VTE, we evaluated the effect of polypharmacy on bleeding and on the relative differences between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist (VKA). We assessed the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) by number of comedications (none, 1-3, ≥4) at baseline, and by use of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors. Interaction between rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin/VKA and comedication was assessed by Cox regression analysis with p. We conclude that fixed-dose rivaroxaban as compared with enoxaparin followed by dose-adjusted VKA is not associated with an increased bleeding risk in patients with VTE administered polypharmacy in general and CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors specifically. This implies that the observed increased bleeding risks with polypharmacy and use of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors are likely explained by comorbidities and frailty, and not by pharmacokinetic interactions.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Polypharmacy; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

 To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus rivaroxaban among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)..  Using the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics repository, and the Office for National Statistics database, we identified a cohort of patients with NVAF and T2DM newly treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban between 2013 and 2020. Propensity scores with standardized mortality ratio weighting were used to control for confounding. We used weighted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate separately the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and major adverse limb events associated with the use of apixaban compared with rivaroxaban. We also evaluated whether the risk was modified by age, sex, duration of diabetes, microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes, nephropathy, CHA.  The cohort included 11,561 apixaban and 8,265 rivaroxaban users. Apixaban was associated with a similar risk of stroke (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.79-1.23), and a 32% reduced risk of major bleeding (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.59-0.78), compared with rivaroxaban. The risk of major adverse limb events was similar between apixaban and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.54-1.04). Overall, the risk of ischemic stroke and major bleeding was consistent in stratified analyses..  Among patients with NVAF and T2DM, apixaban was associated with a similar risk of stroke and a lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF).. In GLORIA-AF, a large, prospective, global registry program, consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AF were followed for 3 years. The comparative analyses for (1) dabigatran vs rivaroxaban or apixaban and (2) rivaroxaban vs apixaban were performed on propensity score (PS)-matched patient sets. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest.. The GLORIA-AF Phase III registry enrolled 21,300 patients between January 2014 and December 2016. Of these, 3839 were prescribed dabigatran, 4015 rivaroxaban and 4505 apixaban, with median ages of 71.0, 71.0, and 73.0 years, respectively. In the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dabigatran vs rivaroxaban were, for stroke: 1.27 (0.79-2.03), major bleeding 0.59 (0.40-0.88), myocardial infarction 0.68 (0.40-1.16), and all-cause death 0.86 (0.67-1.10). For the comparison of dabigatran vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 1.16 (0.76-1.78), myocardial infarction 0.84 (0.48-1.46), major bleeding 0.98 (0.63-1.52) and all-cause death 1.01 (0.79-1.29). For the comparison of rivaroxaban vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 0.78 (0.52-1.19), myocardial infarction 0.96 (0.63-1.45), major bleeding 1.54 (1.14-2.08), and all-cause death 0.97 (0.80-1.19).. Patients treated with dabigatran had a 41% lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, but similar risks of stroke, MI, and death. Relative to apixaban, patients treated with dabigatran had similar risks of stroke, major bleeding, MI, and death. Rivaroxaban relative to apixaban had increased risk for major bleeding, but similar risks for stroke, MI, and death.. URL: https://www.. gov . Unique identifiers: NCT01468701, NCT01671007. Date of registration: September 2013.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The optimal timing of initiating oral anticoagulants after reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke is unknown. Factors related to early initiation of rivaroxaban and differences in clinical outcomes of stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who underwent reperfusion therapy was investigated.. From data of 1,333 NVAF patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in a prospective multicenter study, patients who started rivaroxaban after intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy were included. The clinical outcomes included the composite of ischemic events (recurrent ischemic stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism) and major bleeding at 3 months.. Among the 424 patients, the median time from index stroke to starting rivaroxaban was 3.2 days. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, infarct size (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95%CI, 0.99-1.00) was inversely and successful reperfusion (OR, 2.13; 95%CI, 1.24-3.72) was positively associated with initiation of rivaroxaban within 72 hours. 205 patients were assigned to the early group (< 72 hours) and 219 patients (≥ 72 hours) to the late group. Multivariable Cox regression models showed comparable hazard ratios between the two groups at 3 months for ischemic events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.18; 95%CI, 0.03-1.32) and major bleeding (HR, 1.80; 95%CI, 0.24-13.54).. Infarct size and results of reperfusion therapy were associated with the timing of starting rivaroxaban. There were no significant differences in the rates of ischemic events and major bleeding between patients after reperfusion therapy who started rivaroxaban < 72 hours and ≥ 72 hours after the index stroke.. Unique identifier: NCT02129920; URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infarction; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Ischemic Stroke; Prospective Studies; Reperfusion; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Extended thromboprophylaxis has not been widely implemented in acutely ill medical patients because of bleeding concerns. The MAGELLAN (Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medically Ill Patients Comparing Rivaroxaban With Enoxaparin) and MARINER (Medically Ill Patient Assessment of Rivaroxaban Versus Placebo in Reducing Post-Discharge Venous Thrombo-Embolism Risk) trials evaluated whether rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin or placebo could prevent venous thromboembolism without increased bleeding. We hypothesized that patients with major bleeding but not those with nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding would be at an increased risk of all-cause mortality (ACM).. We evaluated all bleeding events in patients taking at least 1 dose of study drug and their association with ACM in 4 mutually exclusive groups: (1) no bleeding, or first event was (2) nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding, (3) major bleeding, or (4) trivial bleeding. Using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics associated with ACM, we assessed the risk of ACM after such events.. Compared with patients with no bleeding, the risk of ACM for patients with nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding was not increased in MARINER (hazard ratio, 0.43;. Patients with major bleeding had an increased risk of ACM, whereas nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding was not consistently associated with an increased risk of death. These results inform the risk-benefit calculus of extended thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients.. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: MAGELLAN, NCT00571649. URL: https://www.. gov; Unique identifier: MARINER, NCT02111564.

Topics: Aftercare; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Discharge; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Few studies have compared the frequency of hemorrhages after tooth extraction between patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and those taking warfarin or no anticoagulants. Further, the effects of the timing of DOAC administration and tooth extraction on the frequency of post-extraction hemorrhage have not been demonstrated. Therefore, we compared the frequency of post-extraction hemorrhages in patients in these different conditions and examined the effects of the timing of DOAC administration and tooth extraction on the frequency.. Prospective multicenter study.. Eighty-six Japanese hospitals.. In total, 182 teeth extracted from 145 individuals (119 teeth from adult males) receiving dabigatran and 88 teeth from individuals (62 teeth from adult males) receiving rivaroxaban were included.. Tooth extraction was followed by a 7-day observational period between November 1, 2008 and December 31, 2015. Dabigatran was administered twice daily; rivaroxaban was administered once a day.. Hemorrhage after tooth extraction.. The frequency of hemorrhage after tooth extraction was 1.65%, 3.41%, and 3.63% in those treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively, and 0.39% in those who did not receive anticoagulants. Hemorrhages after tooth extraction were significantly higher in the rivaroxaban group than in patients who did not receive anticoagulants (P = 0.008). These frequencies did not differ significantly in the dabigatran and rivaroxaban groups compared to the warfarin group (P = 0.221 and P = 1.000, respectively).. The frequency of hemorrhaging after tooth extraction appeared to be similar in patients receiving continuous dabigatran or rivaroxaban and in those receiving continuous warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Tooth Extraction; Warfarin

Primary and recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) commonly occur in patients with cancer. However, because of the National Health Insurance regulations, available dosage forms, and clinical conditions, the prescribed dose of rivaroxaban may not be consistent with its recommended dose.. To evaluate the 6-month recurrence rate of VTE and safety of rivaroxaban for patients with cancer.. Patients with new cancer diagnosis or recurrence from 2014 to 2018 who initiated rivaroxaban for VTE from January 2015 to January 2019 were included. We set the rivaroxaban initiation date as the index date and followed up the patients for 180 days. We collected information regarding the starting and maintenance dose/frequency and the treatment duration. The efficacy outcome was the recurrence of VTE within 180 days. The safety outcome included the major bleeding rate and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) rate.. Approximately, 46.2% of the 65 included patients received a standard starting dose, and 45% of patients received a maintenance dose above 15 mg (median: 23.9 and 13.1 mg per day, respectively). Two-thirds of the patients stopped treatment within 180 days. Recurrent VTE occurred in 2 (3.1%) patients within 6 months. The major bleeding rate was 7.7%, and the CRNMB rate was 3.1%.. The 6-month recurrence rate of VTE and safety profile were similar between the lower and standard dose of rivaroxaban. This result may be applied to the institutions with dosage availability limited by formulary regulation and patients who cannot use full dose because of clinical considerations.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

There are inadequate data on the optimal strategy for transitioning factor Xa inhibitors (FXai; apixaban, rivaroxaban) to unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions.. In patients transitioning from an FXai to an UFH infusion, this study compared the safety and efficacy of monitoring UFH infusions using an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) titration scale versus utilizing an UFH-calibrated anti-Xa titration scale aided by a novel institutional guideline.. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on adult patients transitioning from an FXai to an UFH infusion at 2 medical centers from June 1, 2018, to November 1, 2020. One institution utilized aPTT while the other institution primarily used UFH-calibrated anti-Xa. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, major bleeding, or new thrombosis during the hospitalization with a planned noninferiority analysis. Secondary outcomes were also collected including the amount and duration of UFH administered between cohorts.. The incidence rate of the primary composite endpoint was 6.3% in the anti-Xa group and 11% in the aPTT group (. This represents the first report of a comparison between aPTT versus anti-Xa monitoring in relation to clinical outcomes for patients transitioning from an FXai to an UFH infusion. A transition guideline primarily utilizing an UFH-calibrated anti-Xa assay appears to be a safe alternative to aPTT monitoring and can aid facilities in the management of patients during these complex transitions.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban is a first-line option for the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, limited data are available regarding its effectiveness in morbidly obese patients.. To evaluate rates of thrombosis and bleeding in morbidly obese patients receiving rivaroxaban or warfarin for VTE.. A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare rates of bleeding and thrombosis in patients receiving rivaroxaban versus warfarin for acute VTE. Patients were included if they were older than 18 years and had a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m. A total of 1281 patients were identified for acute VTE and were included in this study with 487 patients receiving rivaroxaban and 785 receiving warfarin. The average cohort age was 57.6 ± 14.6 years, and the average weight was 136.4 ± 27.2 kg. After controlling for confounding factors, the use of rivaroxaban was not associated with an increased hazard of VTE events when compared with warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-1.08,. No difference was observed in obese patients with weight >120 kg or BMI >40 kg/m

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Prior observational studies suggest rivaroxaban is safe and effective among patients with morbid obesity who suffered a venous thromboembolism (VTE) event, but existing data are more limited in the broader population of VTE patients with obesity. This study assessed VTE recurrence, major bleeding, healthcare resource utilization, and healthcare costs among VTE patients with obesity who received rivaroxaban versus warfarin. VTE patients with obesity who initiated rivaroxaban or warfarin after a first VTE (index date) were identified from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database (01/02/2011-09/30/2019). The follow-up period spanned from the index date until health plan disenrollment, end of data availability, cancer diagnosis/treatment, end of the 12 month post-index period, or (for the analysis of major bleeding) anticoagulant discontinuation or switch. Patient characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The weighted rivaroxaban (N = 8666) and warfarin cohorts (N = 5946) were well balanced (mean age = 51 years, females = 52%). Over a 9.6 months mean observation period, rivaroxaban users had a significantly lower risk of VTE recurrence [7.0% vs. 8.2%, HR(95% CI) = 0.85(0.75;0.97)] and a similar risk of major bleeding [4.1% vs. 3.6%, HR(95% CI) = 1.11(0.89;1.37)] relative to warfarin users at 12 months. Relative to warfarin users, rivaroxaban users had significantly fewer all-cause outpatient visits [RR(95% CI) = 0.71(0.70;0.74)]. The higher pharmacy costs incurred by rivaroxaban recipients (cost difference = $1252) were offset by lower medical costs (cost difference = - $2515, all p < 0.05) compared with warfarin recipients. Our findings suggest that rivaroxaban is safe and effective versus warfarin, and associated with lower medical costs among VTE patients with obesity.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Health Care Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

There are a paucity of real-world data examining effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with prior bleeding.. This retrospective analysis included data from 5 insurance claims databases and included NVAF patients prescribed OACs with prior bleeding. One-to-one propensity score matching was conducted between NOACs and warfarin and between NOACs in each database. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and MB.. A total of 244,563 patients (mean age 77; 50% female) with prior bleeding included 55,094 (22.5%) treated with apixaban, 12,500 (5.1%) with dabigatran, 38,246 (15.6%) with rivaroxaban, and 138,723 (56.7%) with warfarin. Apixaban (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.83]) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.87]) had a lower risk of stroke/SE vs. warfarin. Apixaban (HR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.70]) and dabigatran (HR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.96]) had a lower risk of MB vs. warfarin. Apixaban patients had a lower risk of stroke/SE vs. dabigatran (HR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.57, 0.86]) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.96]) and a lower risk of MB than dabigatran (HR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.67, 0.81]) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.68]).. In this real-world analysis of a large sample of NVAF patients with prior bleeding, NOACs were associated with similar or lower risk of stroke/SE and MB vs. warfarin and variable risk of stroke/SE and MB against each other.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism have been demonstrated in Asian and non-Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in multiple studies. However, limited published data exist on its use specifically in treatment-naïve patients from the Asia region. Patients in South Korea and Taiwan can now receive rivaroxaban as first-line therapy, allowing for data generation in this patient group.. XaMINA was a prospective, real-world, multicenter, single-arm, observational cohort study of patients with NVAF in South Korea and Taiwan naïve to anticoagulation and initiating rivaroxaban. The primary outcome was major bleeding; secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, symptomatic thromboembolic events, and treatment persistence.. In total, 1094 patients were included and the follow-up was 1 year. The baseline mean CHADS. XaMINA demonstrated low incidence rates of major bleeding events and thromboembolic events in patients with NVAF newly initiating rivaroxaban in South Korea and Taiwan, consistent with previous real-world studies reconfirming the results of the ROCKET AF study.. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT03284762) on 15 September 2017.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the 2MACE in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with rivaroxaban and to improve the accuracy of 2MACE.. This was a post-authorization and observational study of AF adults treated with rivaroxaban for ≥ 6 months. The primary endpoint was any of the major adverse cardiac events (MACE), namely, cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and myocardial revascularization. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the performance of 2MACE, and a new score, 2MACER to predict MACE.. A total of 1433 patients were included (74.2 ± 9.7 years, CHA₂DS₂-VASc 3.5 ± 1.5, 26.9% 2MACE ≥ 3). The annual event rates (follow-up 2.5 years) were 1.07% for MACE, 0.66% for thromboembolic events and 1.04% for major bleeding. Patients with 2MACE ≥ 3 (vs. < 3) had higher risk of stroke/systemic embolism/transient ischemic attack (odds ratio [OR] 5.270; 95% CI 2.216-12.532), major bleeding (OR 4.624; 95% CI 2.163-9.882), MACE (OR 3.202; 95% CI 1.548-6.626) and cardiovascular death (OR 3.395; 95% CI 1.396-8.259). 2MACE was recalculated giving 1 more point to patients with baseline a glomerular filtration rate < 50 mL/min/1.73 m² (2MACER); 2MACER vs. 2MACE: IDI 0.1%, p = 0.126; NRI 23.9%, p = 0.125; AUC: 0.651 (95% CI 0.547-0.755) vs. 0.638 (95% CI 0.534-0.742), respectively; p = 0.361.. In clinical practice, AF patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban exhibit a low risk of events. 2MACE score acts as a modest predictor of a higher risk of adverse outcomes in this population. 2MACER did not significantly increase the ability of 2MACE to predict MACE.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Anticoagulant use prior to trauma has been associated with increased incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression, and mortality. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) are commonly used as off-label treatments for factor Xa inhibitor-associated life-threatening hemorrhage. At this time, there is no consensus regarding appropriate indication, target dose, or outcomes of PCC administration in patients presenting with traumatic ICH. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of reversal with PCC on hemorrhage progression and outcomes in patients with TBI on preinjury factor Xa inhibitors.. This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients ≥ 18 years presenting with an acute TBI of any severity on apixaban or rivaroxaban from September 1, 2016, to September 1, 2019. Patients were grouped on the basis of receipt of PCCs for reversal (i.e., reversal or no reversal). Exclusion criteria included spontaneous ICH or known coagulopathy. Propensity score matching was conducted with the following variables: age, Abbreviated Injury Scale (head) score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. The primary outcome was hemorrhage stability within 48 h. Secondary outcomes included degree of hemorrhage progression, in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, and incidence of thromboembolic events.. Of the 115 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 84 were included in the propensity score matched data set. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and TBI severity were similar. The majority of patients in the reversal group (35 [83.3%]) and the no reversal (NR) group (40 [95.2%]) experienced a mild TBI (admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14 to 15). In the reversal group, patients received 34.3 units/kg activated PCC, 30.5 units/kg four-factor PCC, or 54.9 units/kg four-factor PCC and activated PCC on average. There was no difference observed in the incidence of hemorrhage progression (10.8% NR vs. 15.0% reversal; p = 0.739) or in median change in ICH volume (0 mL NR vs. 1 mL reversal; p = 0.2199) between groups. Additionally, reversal did not affect in-hospital mortality (3 [7.1%] NR vs. 4 [9.5%] reversal; p > 0.999). One patient in the reversal group developed a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) during the hospitalization; however, this did not result in a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of DVT (p > 0.999).. This study demonstrated that PCC used for the treatment of factor Xa inhibitor-associated ICH related to mild TBI did not significantly impact the incidence or degree of hemorrhage progression, and PCC treatment did not result in increased thromboembolic events.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Despite evolving evidence, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with extremes of body weight remains controversial. This study aimed to measure the impact of DOACs compared to warfarin on safety and efficacy outcomes in extreme body weight patients. This multi-center, health system, retrospective study examined the outcomes of patients with all body weights and extreme body weights prescribed a DOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban) or warfarin for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism over a 9-year period. The primary outcome was a composite of thromboembolism, symptomatic recurrent VTE, or severe bleeding; analyzed by pre-determined BMI cutoffs. A total of 19,697 patients were included in the study: 11,604 in the DOAC group and in the 8093 in the warfarin group. 295 patients were underweight and 9108 patients were pre-obese to obese class 3. After adjusting for potential confounders, warfarin patients had higher odds of experiencing the composite outcome compared to DOAC patients (OR 1.337, 95% CI 1.212-1.475). Additionally, obese patients were 24.6% more likely to experience the outcome compared to normal BMI patients. Adjusted modeling showed that warfarin patients experienced higher bleed rates compared to DOAC patients (OR 1.432, 95% CI 1.266-1.620). Obese patients were less likely to be diagnosed with a bleed (OR 0.749, 95% CI 0.658-0.854), and underweight patients were more likely to be diagnosed with a bleed (OR 1.522, 95% CI 1.095-2.115) compared to normal BMI patients. In conclusion, DOACs for atrial fibrillation or VTE in patients with extreme body weights appear safe and effective when compared to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity, Morbid; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thinness; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have recently proven their efficacy and safety, as primary and secondary prevention agents for thrombosis in cancer patients. We aimed to determine if DOACs might be a suitable choice to reduce the thrombotic risk in myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) patients.. We analysed a large multicentric cohort of MPN patients treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban after atrial fibrillation (AF) or thrombotic events.. We included 135 MPN patients with a median follow-up of 23.8 months since DOAC initiation. Twenty patients (14.8 %) developed 30 thrombotic events (28 arterial thromboses in 19 patients) for a global incidence of 6.5 % patient-years. No difference was highlighted between apixaban and rivaroxaban in terms of thrombosis risk, but the incidence of arterial thrombosis was significantly higher on low-dose DOACs (11.9 vs. 4.5 % patient-years, p = 0.04). Bleeding events were more frequent in the full-dose group (41.2 vs. 15.2 %, p = 0.006). However, major and clinically relevant non major (CRNM) bleeding events occurred in 18 patients (13.3 %), with no difference between the groups. Age was the only identified thrombotic risk factor, whereas risk factors for major or CRNM bleeding were a full-dose treatment regimen and a combination of DOAC/low-dose aspirin.. DOACs seem effective in preventing venous thrombosis in MPN patients with AF or VTE. For these high-risk patients, low-dose DOACs exposed patients to more arterial thrombosis but fewer bleeding events. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate and compare DOACs to the currently recommended antithrombotic drugs for high-risk MPN patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

Andexanet alfa is approved (FDA "accelerated approval"; EMA "conditional approval") as the first specific reversal agent for factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor-associated uncontrolled or life-threatening bleeding. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCC) are commonly used as an off-label, non-specific, factor replacement approach to manage FXa inhibitor-associated life-threatening bleeding. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of andexanet alfa versus 4F-PCC for management of apixaban- or rivaroxaban-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).. This two-cohort comparison study included andexanet alfa patients enrolled at US hospitals from 4/2015 to 3/2020 in the prospective, single-arm ANNEXA-4 study and a synthetic control arm of 4F-PCC patients admitted within a US healthcare system from 12/2016 to 8/2020. Adults with radiographically confirmed ICH who took their last dose of apixaban or rivaroxaban < 24 h prior to the bleed were included. Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 7, hematoma volume > 60 mL, or planned surgery within 12 h were excluded. Outcomes were hemostatic effectiveness from index to repeat scan, mortality within 30 days, and thrombotic events within five days. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using propensity score-overlap weighted logistic regression.. The study included 107 andexanet alfa (96.6% low dose) and 95 4F-PCC patients (79.3% receiving a 25 unit/kg dose). After propensity score-overlap weighting, mean age was 79 years, GCS was 14, time from initial scan to reversal initiation was 2.3 h, and time from reversal to repeat scan was 12.2 h in both arms. Atrial fibrillation was present in 86% of patients. Most ICHs were single compartment (78%), trauma-related (61%), and involved the intracerebral and/or intraventricular space(s) (53%). ICH size was ≥ 10 mL in volume (intracerebral and/or ventricular) or ≥ 10 mm in thickness (subdural or subarachnoid) in 22% of patients and infratentorial in 15%. Andexanet alfa was associated with greater odds of achieving hemostatic effectiveness (85.8% vs. 68.1%; OR 2.73; 95% CI 1.16-6.42) and decreased odds of mortality (7.9% vs. 19.6%; OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.13-0.98) versus 4F-PCC. Two thrombotic events occurred with andexanet alfa and none with 4F-PCC.. In this indirect comparison of patients with an apixaban- or rivaroxaban-associated ICH, andexanet alfa was associated with better hemostatic effectiveness and improved survival compared to 4F-PCC. Trial registration NCT02329327; registration date: December 31, 2014.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Propensity Score; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

The population of elderly with cardiovascular diseases and multimorbidity is rapidly growing. For decades, different antithrombotic therapies have been studied to find the most effective therapy in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. Recently, large trials have investigated a new antithrombotic therapy consisting of a platelet aggregation inhibitor and a low-dose anticoagulant (aspirin plus rivaroxaban). This combination inhibits both primary and secondary haemostasis, and is therefore called 'dual pathway inhibition' (DPI). DPI leads to a further reduction of the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events as compared to aspirin monotherapy, but increases the risk of bleeding. The population at high risk of ischemic events, but without an increased bleeding risk, is expected to experience the highest risk reduction and therefore the highest net clinical benefit of DPI. This population consists of patients with polyvascular disease, heart failure, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus and other uncontrolled risk factors.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Polypharmacy; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Polypharmacy; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of fatal adverse events (AEs) of rivaroxaban combined with aspirin and to underline the importance of the rational use of drugs.. The WHO global database of reported potential side effects of medicinal products (VigiBase) was searched for fatal AEs in the combined use of rivaroxaban and aspirin, and the clinical characteristics of those cases with sufficient information (vigiGrade completeness score ≥ 0.80) were analyzed.. By January 19, 2020, 2309 fatal adverse event reports of rivaroxaban combined with aspirin from 21 countries were entered in VigiBase. One hundred and twenty cases contained further information, of which 42 were female (35%) and 78 were male (65%). The median age was 75 (range 34 to 93) years, and 109 cases (91%) were elderly patients (≥ 65 years). The AEs listed in the fatal case reports included bleeding in 114 cases (mainly intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 59 and 46 respectively, accounting for 88%) and ischemic events in six cases (ischemic stroke in three, acute myocardial infarction in two, myocardial infarction combined with acute liver failure in one). Among the patients with bleeding events, 108 (95%) had existing risk factors for bleeding or for interacting with aspirin or rivaroxaban. These may be divided into the following: diseases (hypertension, renal impairment, history of stroke, peptic ulcer, or previous bleeding), drugs (high dose aspirin, antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, P-gp inhibitors/CYP3A4 inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroids, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), or other factors (e.g., elderly, low body weight, or excessive intake of ginger, fish oil, or alcohol). There were 45 cases with two or more of these risk factors in addition to rivaroxaban and aspirin. Patients with ischemic events are often in very high-risk groups of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or self-discontinuation of treated drugs. Medication errors occurred in 24 patients (20%): excessive treatment in 17 cases, contraindication in three, frequency error in two, excessive treatment combined with contraindication in one, and self-discontinuation in one.. Fatal AEs related to rivaroxaban combined with aspirin, including bleeding and ischemic events, have been reported mostly in the elderly, and sometimes involved medication errors. The fatal AEs mainly manifested as serious bleeding, and most of them occurred in patients with concurrent multiple risk factors. Monitoring coagulation during rivaroxaban treatment is recommended in very high-risk ASCVD populations, and attention should be paid to prevention of medication errors.

Topics: Aspirin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban

Guidance for dabigatran and rivaroxaban in overweight patients diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is still lacking.. Compare the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran and rivaroxaban for the treatment of NVAF in the overweight population.. A total of 396 out of 1029 overweight patients with NVAF at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, from January 2017 and December 2018 were retrospectively enrolled using propensity score matching analysis. The clinical outcomes were analyzed by chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier analyses. The risk of bleeding and thrombosis was assessed using a Cox regression analysis and validated using a nomogram model.. Dabigatran therapy was shown to be equally effective. It may be superior in reducing bleeding risk in an overweight population with NVAF than rivaroxaban. Further prospective studies are encouraged for analysis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Overweight; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

To observe the safety and efficacy of warfarin and rivaroxaban in anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. A total of 96 patients with AF treated in our hospital from June 2019 to February 2021 were enrolled in this study. According to the different modes of drug administration, the patients were divided into the warfarin group and rivaroxaban group. Demographic and clinical data such as age, body weight, and previous drug use were collected. The blood routine, liver and kidney function, blood coagulation routine, and cardiac color ultrasound were accessed. The valvular atrial fibrillation and anticoagulant taboos were excluded, and the risk of embolism and bleeding was evaluated. Among them, 48 patients in the warfarin group were given warfarin once a day, and the international ratio (INR) was used to adjust the dose, and the INR was controlled between 2.0 and 3.0. In contrast, 48 patients in the rivaroxaban group received a fixed dose of rivaroxaban 20 mg or 15 mg once a day. After administration, regular telephone or outpatient follow-up was given once a month, to monitor patients' drug compliance and ask if there was bleeding, and to detect blood routine, urine routine, fecal routine+occult blood, and liver and kidney function. In addition, at the beginning of 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up, each patient was given cardiac color Doppler ultrasound, peripheral vascular color ultrasound, and brain CT to determine whether there were mural thrombosis, stroke, and peripheral arterial thromboembolism. The INR attainment rate, coagulation index, thromboembolism, bleeding, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.. There was no significant difference in serum Dmurd and NT-proBNP levels between the two groups before treatment and 3, 6, and 9 months after treatment. There was no significant difference in the number of venous embolism, pulmonary embolism, cerebral embolism, and total embolism between the two groups (. Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban anticoagulant therapy has the same advantage in tolerance and prevention of thromboembolism in patients with AF, but rivaroxaban can effectively reduce the risk of bleeding in patients with AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

This is the first study examining real-life data of pediatric cancer patients treated with rivaroxaban. Children with thrombocytopenia and high bleeding risk were excluded from previous clinical trials. Data regarding the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in pediatric cancer-associated thrombosis are scarce. Our case series included 16 children aged 7.5-17 years. Thrombus resolution rate in our study was comparable to results of previous studies. However, higher rates of thrombotic and bleeding complications were seen in our study as compared to previous reports, especially among patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Child; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

The concurrent administration of dronedarone and oral anti-coagulants is common because both are used in managing atrial fibrillation (AF). Dronedarone is a moderate inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) enzyme and P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Apixaban and rivaroxaban are P-gp and CYP3A4 substrates. This study aims to investigate the impact of exposure and bleeding risk of apixaban or rivaroxaban when co-administered with dronedarone using physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.. Modeling and simulation were conducted using Simcyp® Simulator. The parameters required for dronedarone modeling were collected from the literature. The developed dronedarone physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was verified using reported drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between dronedarone and CYP3A4 and P-gp substrates. The model was applied to evaluate the DDI potential of dronedarone on the exposure of apixaban 5 mg every 12 h or rivaroxaban 20 mg every 24 h in geriatric and renally impaired populations. DDIs precipitating major bleeding risks were assessed using exposure-response analyses derived from literature.. The model accurately described the pharmacokinetics of orally administered dronedarone in healthy subjects and accurately predicted DDIs between dronedarone and four CYP3A4 and P-gp substrates with fold errors <1.5. Dronedarone co-administration led to a 1.29 (90 % confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.50) to 1.31 (90 % CI: 1.12-1.46)-fold increase in the area under concentration-time curve for rivaroxaban and 1.33 (90 % CI: 1.15-1.68) to 1.46 (90 % CI: 1.24-1.92)-fold increase for apixaban. The PD model indicated that dronedarone co-administration might potentiate the mean major bleeding risk of apixaban with a 1.45 to 1.95-fold increase. However, the mean major bleeding risk of rivaroxaban was increased by <1.5-fold in patients with normal or impaired renal function.. Dronedarone co-administration increased the exposure of rivaroxaban and apixaban and might potentiate major bleeding risks. Reduced apixaban and rivaroxaban dosing regimens are recommended when dronedarone is co-administered to patients with AF.

Topics: Aged; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Atrial Fibrillation; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Dronedarone; Drug Interactions; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

To provide an updated comparison of the risk and cost of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding between direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC: apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) and warfarin among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients.. Of the 264,479 eligible patients, 38,740 apixaban-warfarin pairs, 76,677 rivaroxaban-warfarin pairs, and 20,955 dabigatran-warfarin pairs were matched. Apixaban (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.46; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.38-0.56) and rivaroxaban (HR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.63-0.80) were associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE compared to warfarin. Apixaban (HR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.51-0.63) and dabigatran (HR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.90) were associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding; rivaroxaban (HR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.07-1.21) was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin. Compared to warfarin, apixaban and rivaroxaban had significantly lower stroke/SE-related medical costs; and apixaban and dabigatran had significantly lower major bleeding-related medical costs.. This real-world analysis showed DOACs to be associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding, and lower medical costs compared to warfarin. Among them, only apixaban appears to be associated with a significantly lower risk of all three outcomes collectively: stroke/SE, major bleeding, and lower related medical costs compared to warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Background We sought to examine outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation with valve repair/replacement. Methods and Results Two atrial fibrillation cohorts from Medicare were identified from 2015 to 2019. They comprised patients who underwent surgical or transcatheter mitral valve repair (MV repair cohort) and surgical aortic or mitral bioprosthetic or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (bioprosthetic cohort). Each cohort was divided into warfarin and DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) groups. Study outcomes included mortality, stroke, and major bleeding. Inverse probability weighting was used for adjustment between the 2 groups in each cohort. The MV repair cohort included 1178 patients. After a median of 468 days, DOACs were associated with lower risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55-0.82],

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Medicare; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

The increasing use of oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) has led to a growing interest in the clinical utility of laboratory monitoring to enhance safety and effectiveness. Particularly, the use of FXaI-specific anti-Xa concentrations has gained traction and been advocated for several indications, but limited studies have explored the role of anti-Xa concentrations in guiding inpatient transitions from oral to parenteral anticoagulants. Therefore, additional data on such approaches are warranted to help balance bleeding and thrombotic risks in the higher acuity inpatient setting. This study sought to compare two strategies for oral-to-parenteral anticoagulant transitions: FXaI anti-Xa concentration-guided versus standard of care (i.e., per-package insert).. This was an observational, single-center, retrospective cohort study conducted from May 2016 to May 2021. Hospitalized patients converted from an oral FXaI (apixaban or rivaroxaban) to therapeutic parenteral anticoagulation with or without FXaI anti-Xa concentration guidance were reviewed. The primary outcome of major bleeding, according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria, was compared between groups. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to evaluate patient characteristics associated with major bleeding events.. A total of 845 patients (388 in the concentration-guided group and 457 in the non-concentration-guided group) met the inclusion criteria. Major bleeding was significantly lower in the concentration-guided versus the non-concentration-guided group (2.2% vs. 11.3%; p < 0.001, respectively). There were no differences between the groups in thromboembolic complications (1.8% concentration guided vs. 1.5% non-concentration guided; p = 0.72) despite a significantly longer time from last oral FXaI dose to parenteral anticoagulant initiation in the concentration-guided group (27.9 h vs. 15.1 h; p < 0.01). The concentration-guided group had an 80% lower risk of major bleeding compared with the non-concentration-guided group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.39; p < 0.01).. This analysis suggests using FXaI anti-Xa concentrations to guide the transition from oral to parenteral anticoagulants may be beneficial in reducing major bleeds in select patient populations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Outcomes following andexanet alfa reversal of factor Xa inhibitors in patients requiring urgent or emergent invasive procedures are lacking. This study aimed to describe efficacy and safety outcomes following andexanet alfa administration within 24 h of an invasive procedure.. This single-center, observational, retrospective study included patients who received andexanet alfa within 24 h of an invasive or surgical procedure. The primary outcome was hemostatic efficacy graded as excellent, good, or poor using similar definitions to the ANNEXA-4 criteria. Secondary outcomes included hospital discharge disposition, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, 30-day thromboischemic event rates, and serum coagulation assay changes pre- and postreversal.. Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria; of these, 27 (62.8%) received apixaban and 16 (37.2%) were treated with rivaroxaban prior to admission. The indications for reversal were categorized as intracranial (n = 20 [45.5%]) or extracranial (n = 24 [54.5%]) sites. Majority of patients required emergent operative procedures (18 [40.9%]), followed by invasive device placement (10 [22.7%]) or arterial embolization (9 [20.5%]). Thirty-eight (86.4%) patients were able to be adequately graded for hemostatic efficacy. Overall, 30 (78.9%) patients achieved excellent or good hemostasis within 24 h after periprocedural administration of andexanet alfa (19 [82.6%] apixaban vs. 11 [78.6%] rivaroxaban; 12 [80.0%] intracranial events vs. 18 [78.3%] extracranial events). Discharge disposition was most often to a short- or long-term care facilities (27 [61.4%]). Thirty-day mortality and thromboischemic complications occurred in 15 (34.1%) and 12 (27.3%) patients, respectively. Prothrombin time and antifactor Xa assay results were significantly decreased after andexanet alfa administration (p < 0.05) while thromboelastogram assay values (reaction time, kinetic time, and activated clotting time) showed nonsignificant changes pre- versus postreversal.. Andexanet alfa may be used for urgent or emergent reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban peri-procedurally with promising hemostatic outcomes. Further prospective, comparative clinical research is warranted.

Topics: Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. However, data on the association between oral anticoagulants and the hazards of VTE complications in Taiwanese patients with VTE is limited. This study aimed to compare the hazards of recurrent VTE, bleeding, and mortality between patients with VTE receiving rivaroxaban, a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC), and those receiving heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) followed by warfarin. Patients with VTE treated with rivaroxaban, or heparin or LMWH followed by warfarin were enrolled from 2 million random samples from Taiwan's National Health Insurance database between 2013 and 2016. Hazards of recurrent VTE (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), major bleeding, and mortality in rivaroxaban and warfarin users were investigated. Survival analyses were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Users of rivaroxaban (183) and warfarin (456) were included in the study. Patients receiving rivaroxaban did not have significantly lower hazards of developing recurrent VTE (HR, 0.72 [CI, 0.37-1.37], P = .31) and mortality (HR, 0.86 [CI, 0.49-1.50], P = .59) than those receiving heparin or LMWH followed by warfarin. In addition, the hazard ratio of major bleeding was not significantly different between the 2 regimens (HR, 1.80 [CI, 0.39-8.29], P = .45). Rivaroxaban was not associated with lower risks of recurrent VTE and mortality and higher hazards of major bleeding than heparin or LMWH followed by warfarin in Taiwanese patients with VTE. Clinicians may tailor oral anticoagulants for VTE patients according to the patient's characteristics, cost-effectiveness and healthcare system policy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have demonstrated a positive benefit-risk balance compared with vitamin K antagonists in both clinical trials and real-world studies. However, with increased DOAC use, the risk of bleeding should not be underestimated. In clinical practice, the annual rate of DOAC-related major bleeding is between approximately 1.5% and 3.5%. The outcome of major bleeds was similar or better in patients receiving DOACs than in those taking vitamin K antagonists. Due to their short half-lives, supportive measures are sufficient to manage most bleeds in patients receiving DOACs. Anticoagulant reversal should only be considered with life-threatening bleeds or with serious bleeds that fail to respond to usual measures. Effective strategies to reverse the anticoagulant effects of DOACs are now available. Idarucizumab has been approved for dabigatran reversal and andexanet alfa was recently granted approval for the reversal of apixaban or rivaroxaban in patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding events. Other reversal agents (e.g. ciraparantag for heparins and DOACs) are under development. Non-specific prohemostatic agents (e.g. prothrombin complex concentrate) can counteract the anticoagulant action of DOACs in emergency situations, when specific reversal agents are unavailable. However, specific reversal agents are efficacious and safe and should be preferred when available.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinogen; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaolin; Male; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thrombelastography

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the presence of heart failure (HF) on the clinical profile and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) anticoagulated with rivaroxaban.. Observational and non-interventional study that included AF adults recruited from 79 Spanish centers, anticoagulated with rivaroxaban ≥ 6 months before inclusion. Data were analyzed according to baseline HF status.. Out of 1,433 patients, 326 (22.7%) had HF at baseline. Compared to patients without HF, HF patients were older (75.3 ± 9.9 vs. 73.8 ± 9.6 years; p = 0.01), had more diabetes (36.5% vs. 24.3%; p < 0.01), coronary artery disease (28.2% vs. 12.9%; p < 0.01), renal insufficiency (31.7% vs. 22.6%; p = 0.01), higher CHA2DS2-VASc (4.5 ± 1.6 vs. 3.2 ± 1.4; p < 0.01) and HAS-BLED (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 1.5 ± 1.0; p < 0.01). After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, among HF patients, annual rates of stroke/systemic embolism/transient ischemic attack, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (non-fatal myocardial infarction, revascularization and cardiovascular death), cardiovascular death, and major bleeding were 1.2%, 3.0%, 2.0%, and 1.4%, respectively. Compared to those patients without HF, HF patients had greater annual rates of MACE (3.0% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.01) and cardiovascular death (2.0% vs. 0.2%; p < 0.01), without significant differences regarding other outcomes, including thromboembolic or bleeding events. Previous HF was an independent predictor of MACE (odds ratio 3.4; 95% confidence interval 1.6-7.3; p = 0.002) but not for thromboembolic events or major bleeding.. Among AF patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban, HF patients had a worse clinical profile and a higher MACE risk and cardiovascular mortality. HF was independently associated with the development of MACE, but not with thromboembolic events or major bleeding.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

The safety of dabigatran is poorly studied in patients with liver cirrhosis and has rarely been compared to warfarin in terms of bleeding risks.. We undertook a retrospective cohort study across three tertiary centres in Auckland, New Zealand, between 2008 to 2020. Adults 18 years and over and those with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of cirrhosis were included. Data collected included demographic data and clinical characteristics, baseline medication and comorbidities. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of any bleeding event that resulted in hospital admission.. Overall, 100 patients were included in this study. A total of 52 patients took warfarin, and 48 took dabigatran. Baseline characteristics for both groups were generally similar. The incidence rate of bleeds for patients taking warfarin was 14.4 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 8.8-23.5) compared to 9.1 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 4.5-18.1) for patients taking dabigatran. The incidence rate ratio comparing dabigatran to warfarin was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.23-1.60), p=0.25.. Our study found that patients on dabigatran may have a lower bleeding risk than patients taking warfarin, but this was not statistically significant.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; New Zealand; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTD) is currently the second leading cause of death in cancer patients with a prevalence of approximately 20% compared with that of 5% in the entire adult population. Cancer patients are a heterogeneous group with significant differences in the risk of VTD which is, in particular, determined by the type of tumour, its extent, location, and the presence of metastases. Some tumours represent a mean 3- to 5-fold increase in risk, while in others the risk of developing VTD is even several times higher. In comparison with non-cancer patients, those with a tumour are not only at an increased risk of an initial thromboembolic event, but also of its recurrence, regardless of ongoing anticoagulation which is associated with a higher risk of bleeding, particularly in mucosal involvement. Venous thrombosis and its treatment may interfere with the ongoing diagnosis and treatment. In cancer patients, VTD is a frequent incidental finding on imaging studies. Primary thromboprophylaxis (apixaban, rivaroxaban, LMWH) is currently recommended in selected groups of cancer patients who are either hospitalized for acute internal disease or immobilized and have an active malignancy, undergo outpatient systemic chemotherapy for a tumour with a high risk of VTD (a Khorana score of 2) or surgery and are not at high risk of bleeding. DOACs should be administered six months after the initiation of chemotherapy. If there is a risk of drug interactions or mucosal bleeding, LMWHs are recommended. At present, DOACs (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) and LMWHs are the first-choice drugs in treating VTD. LMWHs are preferred in mucosal tumours, when there is a high risk of bleeding, in progressive malignancy, concomitant emetogenic therapy, and dyspeptic difficulties. In severe renal insufficiency (CrCl < 15 ml/min), vitamin K antagonists may be of value. Individualized treatment should take into consideration the patients general condition, prognosis, and personal preferences.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common disease in elderly patients and thromboembolic complication prophylaxis significantly improves the prognosis in these patients. The study assessed the frequency of individual non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) use among patients ≥75 years and attempted to identify factors predisposing to their prescription.. The data of patients with non-valvular AF hospitalized in the reference cardiology center between 2011 and 2019 were analyzed.. Out of 1443 analyzed patients, 329 (22.8%) received apixaban, 618 (42.8%) dabigatran, and 496 (34.4%) rivaroxaban. The entire population mean age was 82.3 ± 5 years, and 57.9% were females. Independent predictors of apixaban use were age, and bleeding history. Hospitalization for the implantation/reimplantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) reduced the chance of apixaban use. Hypertension was a predictor of dabigatran prescription. The chance of using dabigatran decreased with age. Hypertension and bleeding history decreased the chance of rivaroxaban application.. In hospitalized AF patients ≥75 years, dabigatran was the most frequently used NOAC. Age, comorbidities and bleeding risk determined the selection of individual NOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

To compare real-world effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AFib) for prevention of stroke.. A comparative cohort study in UK general practice data from The Health Improvement Network database.. Before matching, 5655 patients ≥18 years with nonvalvular AFib who initiated at least one DOAC between 1 July 2014 and 31 December 2020 were included. DOACs of interest included apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban and dabigatran, with the primary comparison between apixaban and rivaroxaban. Initiators of DOACs were defined as new users with no record of prescription for any DOAC during 12 months before index date.. The primary outcome was stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic). Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), transient ischaemic attacks (TIA), major bleeding events and a composite angina/MI/stroke (AMS) endpoint.. Compared with rivaroxaban, patients initiating apixaban showed similar rates of stroke (HR: 0.93; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.34), all-cause mortality (HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.22), MI (HR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.68), TIA (HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.72) and AMS (HR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.27). Apixaban initiators showed lower rates of major bleeding events (HR: 0.60; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.75).. Among patients with nonvalvular AFib, apixaban was as effective as rivaroxaban in reducing rate of stroke and safer in terms of major bleeding episodes. This head-to-head comparison supports conclusions drawn from indirect comparisons of DOAC trials against warfarin and demonstrates the potential for real-world evidence to fill evidence gaps and reduce uncertainty in both health technology assessment decision-making and clinical guideline development.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Myocardial Infarction; Primary Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United Kingdom; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infant; Insurance Claim Review; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Assessing bleeding risk during the decision-making process of starting oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is essential. Several bleeding risk scores have been proposed for vitamin K antagonist users but, few studies have focused on validation of these bleeding risk scores in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The aim was to compare the predictive ability of HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in AF patients taking rivaroxaban in the EMIR ('Estudio observacional para la identificación de los factores de riesgo asociados a eventos cardiovasculares mayores en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular tratados con un anticoagulante oral directo [Rivaroxaban]) Study.. EMIR Study was an observational, multicenter, post-authorization, and prospective study that involved AF patients under OAC with rivaroxaban at least 6 months before enrolment. We analysed baseline clinical characteristics and adverse events after 2.5 years of follow-up and validated the predictive ability of HAS-BLED and ORBIT scores for major bleeding (MB) events.We analysed 1433 patients with mean age of 74.2 ± 9.7 (44.5% female). Mean HAS-BLED score was 1.6 ± 1.0 and ORBIT score was 1.1 ± 1.2. The ORBIT score categorised a higher proportion of patients as 'low-risk' (87.1%) compared with 53.5% using the HAS-BLED score. There were 33 MB events (1.04%/year) and 87 patients died (2.73%/year). Both HAS-BLED and ORBIT had a good predictive ability for MB{Area under the curve (AUC) 0.770, [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.693-0.847; P <0.001] and AUC 0.765 (95% CI 0.672-0.858; P <0.001), respectively}. There was a non-significant difference for discriminative ability of the two tested scores (P = 0.930) and risk reclassification in terms of net reclassification improvement (NRI) -5.7 (95% CI -42.4-31.1; P = 0.762). HAS-BLED score showed the best calibration and ORBIT score showed the largest mismatch in calibration, particularly in higher predicted risk patients.. In a prospective real-world AF population under rivaroxaban from EMIR registry, the HAS-BLED score had good predictive performance and calibration compared with ORBIT score for MB events. ORBIT score presented worse calibration than HAS-BLED in this DOAC treated population.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban

This study aims to analyze the real-life data of patients who were prescribed rivaroxaban and apixaban and to emphasize the points that we think will make a difference compared to randomized controlled studies.. The patients who accepted to participate in the study in whom rivaroxaban (15-20 mg) and apixaban (2.5-5 mg) were started with the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 and whose records were fully accessed through the hospital automation system were included in the study.. One hundred and ninety-four (48.5%) of a total of 400 patients using rivaroxaban and apixaban were women. The mean age was 73.34 ± 10.45 years, and the age range was 41-98. There was no significant difference in terms of demographic characteristics, background information of the patients, and the medications. Drug-induced complications and mortality rates were also similar. The GFR change rates of the patients in both groups were similar even though the initial GFRs were significantly higher in rivaroxaban group. The mean age and ejection fractions of the patients using rivaroxaban 15 mg were found to be lower than those of patients using rivaroxaban 20 mg whereas the mean systolic blood pressure and HAS-BLED score were found to be higher. Ischemic stroke and mortality rates were higher in patients using 15 mg rivaroxaban than patients using 20 mg rivaroxaban. The rates of nonmajor bleeding in patients using rivaroxaban 15 mg were lower compared to those using 20 mg, and this difference was statistically significant.. Stroke rates were found to be higher and to have similar bleeding rates compared to major clinical studies in our real-life analysis. However, high ischemic cerebrovascular event and low nonmajor bleeding rates are remarkable in low dose use of rivaroxaban. It is clear that there is a need to consider existing dose reduction criteria in terms of correct prescribing.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The aim was to identify sex-specific factors linked with oral anticoagulant initiation in a cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation using administrative data from Quebec (Canada) between 2014 and 2017. Cohort entry defined as new users, that is, no claims in last 12 months, a cohort of 32 050 patients was stratified in two groups, that is, women and men. Multivariable regression models were used to identify factors of initiations for low- and standard-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin, and low- versus standard-dose DOACs. In both sexes, warfarin initiation decreased and DOAC initiation increased, with year of initiation as major factors of DOACs use. In 2017, the increase was of 2- to 4-fold and 3- to 8-fold for low- and standard-dose DOACs (vs. warfarin), respectively. The proportion of patients starting on a low-dose DOAC was higher in women than men. Older age for both sexes and CHADS

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

In the last decade, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been incorporated as an anticoagulation tool in patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Although they have a better pharmacological profile than vitamin K antagonists (VKA), the use of these drugs is not massive. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of DOACs in patients with acute PE and to detect determinants of its use.. Prespecified analysis of the CONAREC XX registry that included patients with acute PE in 64 centers in Argentina. An analysis was performed to detect predictors of DOAC prescription at discharge.. 579 patients who received anticoagulation at hospital discharge were analyzed: 60% received VKA, 21% heparin and 19% DOAC (of them, 49% Rivaroxaban, 34% Apixaban, and 17% Dabigatran). Patients receiving DOACs had less severe PE, lower risk of bleeding, and fewer in-hospital complications. At 30-day follow-up, there were no differences in all-cause mortality or bleeding. Health coverage by social insurance (OR 7.45, CI 95% 1.74-31.9, p < 0.01) or by private coverage (OR 10.5, CI 95% 2.4-45.9, p < 0.01) were independent predictors of DOAC prescription at discharge, and history of heart failure (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.84, p = 0.028) and oncological disease (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89; p = 0.02) were predictors not prescribe them.. One in five survivors of acute PE received DOACs at hospital discharge in Argentina, and this was determined by clinical and economic variables.. En la última década los anticoagulantes orales directos (ACOD) se incorporaron como herramienta para la anticoagulación en pacientes con tromboembolia pulmonar (TEP) aguda. Aunque tienen un mejor perfil farmacológico que los antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK), el uso de estos fármacos no es masivo. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el uso de ACOD en pacientes con TEP aguda y detectar determinantes de su indicación.. Análisis preespecificado del registro CONAREC XX que incorporó pacientes con TEP aguda en 64 centros de Argentina. Se realizó un análisis para detectar predictores de prescripción de ACOD al alta.. Se analizaron 579 pacientes que recibieron anticoagulación al alta hospitalaria: el 60% recibió AVK, el 21% heparinas y el 19% ACOD (de ellos, un 49% rivaroxabán, un 34% apixabán y un 17% dabigatrán). Los pacientes que recibieron ACOD tenían TEP de menor gravedad, menor riesgo de hemorragia y menos complicaciones intrahospitalarias. En el seguimiento a 30 días no hubo diferencias en mortalidad por todas las causas o sangrados. La cobertura de salud por un seguro social (odds ratio [OR] 7.45; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 1.74-31.9; p < 0.01) o por cobertura privada (OR 10.5; IC 95%: 2.4-45.9; p < 0.01) fueron predictores independientes de la prescripción de ACOD al alta, y el antecedente de insuficiencia cardiaca (OR 0.19; IC 95%: 0.04-0.84; p = 0.028) y de enfermedad oncológica (OR 0.49; IC 95%: 0.27-0.89; p = 0.02) fueron predictores de no prescribirlos.. Uno de cada cinco supervivientes de TEP aguda recibió ACOD al egreso hospitalario en Argentina, y esto fue determinado por variables clínicas y económicas.

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, is effective against venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence without increasing the risk of major bleeding in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT). However, its clot regression effects are poorly understood. This single-arm, prospective interventional study aimed to investigate the clot regression effects of rivaroxaban in 40 CAT patients, through a contrast-enhanced computed tomography at baseline, 3 weeks, and 3 months of rivaroxaban treatment. The primary endpoint was the clot-regression ratio calculated from the thrombus volumes at 3 weeks and 3 months. Compared with baseline, the total clot volume was significantly reduced at both 3 weeks and 3 months after initiation (p < 0.01). The clot-regression rates were statistically significant with 83.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.8-92.3%) at 3 weeks and 98.7% (95% CI, 97.1-100.2%) at 3 months, with complete resolution in 36.1% and 80.8% of patients at 3 weeks and 3 months, respectively. One patient had recurrent VTE after dose reduction, and seven had non-fatal major bleeding. Therefore, rivaroxaban had a sufficient clot-regression effect against CAT with caution of bleeding complication.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism

Background The COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) trial decreased major adverse cardiovascular events with very low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease. We examined the eligibility and potential real-world impact of this strategy on the COMPASS-eligible population. Methods and Results COMPASS eligibility criteria were applied to the CANHEART (Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team) registry, a population-based cohort of Ontario adults. We compared 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events and major bleeding rates stratified by COMPASS eligibility and by clinical risk factors. We applied COMPASS trial rivaroxaban/aspirin arm hazard ratios to estimate the potential impact on the COMPASS-eligible cohort. Among 362 797 patients with coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease, 38% were deemed eligible, 47% ineligible, and 15% indeterminate. Among eligible patients, a greater number of risk factors was associated with higher rates of cardiovascular outcomes, whereas bleeding rates increased minimally. Over 5 years, applying COMPASS treatment effects to eligible patients resulted in a 2.4% absolute risk reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events and a number needed to treat of 42, and a 1.3% absolute risk increase of major bleeding and number needed to harm (NNH) of 77. Those with at least 2 risk factors had a 3.0% absolute risk reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (number needed to treat =34) and a 1.6% absolute risk increase of major bleeding (number needed to harm =61). Conclusions Implementation of very-low-dose rivaroxaban therapy would potentially impact

Topics: Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention

Kinase inhibitors (KI) and antibodies targeting the VEGF pathway are approved in a broad spectrum of cancers and associated with an increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events (TE). The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) apixaban and rivaroxaban is increasing in cancer patients, but limited data are available for patients receiving anti-VEGF agents.. To assess safety of DOAC with concomitant anti-VEGF agents, a retrospective chart review of all patients receiving concomitantly DOAC and anti-VEGF agents was performed from 2013 to 2020 in our center. Data on demographics, safety, and time on treatment were collected. Main outcome was safety (bleeding and thromboembolic events).. Of 92 patients (median age 66 years (IQR: 59-72)), 40 were treated with KI and 52 with bevacizumab. The most frequent primary tumor sites were colon/rectum (24%), kidney (21%), ovary (13%), lung (11%), soft tissue sarcoma (10%), and thyroid (9%); 2% had brain metastases. Apixaban 5 mg bid (n = 41) or rivaroxaban 20 mg daily (n = 51) were given for TE (65%), atrial fibrillation (32%), or other indications (3%). The median duration of concomitant treatment was 4.8 months (95%CI: 0.7-50.0) with bevacizumab and 11.7 months (95%CI: 0.1-53.8) with KI. Grade ≥ 3 bleeding events occurred in 5 patients (5%): 4 patients receiving bevacizumab (one grade 5 upper digestive tract bleeding and three grade 3 rectal or vaginal hemorrhages) and 1 patient under cabozantinib for kidney cancer with endobronchial metastasis (grade 3 hemoptysis). Grade ≥ 3 TE occurred in 8 patients (9%): 7 patients receiving bevacizumab (including one grade 5 pulmonary embolism), and one patient receiving sunitinib (grade 3 pulmonary embolism). Median time-to-event (bleeding or thrombotic event) was not reached (NR) (95%CI: 76.9-NR) for KI and 86.9 months (95%CI: 42.9-148.0) for bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In our experience, the use of DOAC was safe in selected patients treated with KI, but unclear with bevacizumab. More data are needed to endorse guidelines in this specific group of patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Bevacizumab; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Pulmonary Embolism; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

In the absence of robust evidence to guide clinical decision-making, the optimal approach to prevent stroke and systemic embolism in haemodialysis (HD) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains moot. In this position paper, studies on oral anticoagulation (OAC) in HD patients with AF are highlighted, followed by an evidence-based conclusion, a critical analysis to identify sources of bias and practical opinion-based suggestions on how to manage anticoagulation in this specific population. It remains unclear whether AF is a true risk factor for embolic stroke in HD. The currently employed cut-off values for the CHA2DS2-VASc score do not adequately discriminate dialysis patients deriving a net benefit from those suffering a net harm from OAC. Anticoagulation initiation should probably be more restrictive than currently advocated by official guidelines. Recent evidence reveals that the superior benefit-risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) observed in the general population and in moderate chronic kidney disease can be extended to the HD population. VKA may be especially harmful in dialysis patients and should therefore be avoided, in particular in patients with a high bleeding risk and labile international normalized ratio. Dose-finding studies of DOACs suggest that rivaroxaban 10 mg daily and apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily are appropriate choices in dialysis patients. Combined treatment with oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents should be reserved for strong indications and limited in time. Left atrial appendage occlusion is a potential attractive solution to reduce the risk of stroke without increasing bleeding propensity, but it has not been properly studied in dialysis patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Renal Dialysis; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Although not routinely recommended, anti-Xa level monitoring for apixaban or rivaroxaban may be useful in certain clinical scenarios. There are currently no laboratory standards, therapeutic ranges, or proven correlation between anti-Xa levels and clinical outcomes.. This study describes the utilization, application, and association of anti-Xa levels with clinical outcomes in patients receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban.. This retrospective, descriptive study included adult inpatients within the Houston Methodist System on apixaban or rivaroxaban with at least one anti-Xa level ordered subsequent to administered doses. The primary endpoint was major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Secondary endpoints included reasons for anti-Xa level ordering, anti-Xa levels at different time intervals post-dose, and thrombotic events. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed to further evaluate the primary endpoint.. The study population consisted of 169 patients and 234 anti-Xa levels. Twenty-nine levels were obtained in context of major bleeding. The majority of levels were not drawn as peak levels 2-4 hours post-dose, however remained quantifiable above typical observed levels within this timeframe and well beyond 24 hours post-dose. Patient characteristics with major bleeding included elderly age, acute renal impairment, and low body weight. At least 14 unique reasons for anti-Xa level ordering were identified. Twenty-nine levels were associated with thrombotic events.. Anti-Xa levels may be useful for assessment of current drug concentrations, immediate safety of therapy, and guidance for possible clinical interventions. Dose titration and reversal therapies based on anti-Xa level results in major bleeding warrant further research.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

To assess the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding associated with the use of oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in a real-world population.. We identified all anticoagulant-naive initiators of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for the indication AF in Norway between January 2013 and December 2017. Multivariate competing risk regression was used to calculate subhazard ratios (SHRs) describing associations between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin for risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding.. Among 30 401 patients ≥75 years identified (median age 82 years, 53% women, mean CHA. In this nationwide cohort study of patients ≥75 years initiating oral anticoagulation for AF, standard and reduced dose NOACs were associated with similar risks of stroke/SE as warfarin and lower or similar risks of bleeding. The NOACs seem to be a safe option also in elderly patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Limited data exists regarding the clinical outcomes of andexanet alfa and four factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for reversal of apixaban or rivaroxaban in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of 4F-PCC and andexanet alfa for reversal of ICH associated with oral factor Xa inhibitors. This was a retrospective, single-center, case series evaluating hemostatic efficacy of patients receiving andexanet alfa) or 4F-PCC for reversal of apixaban or rivaroxaban after ICH. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, thrombotic complications, timing of reversal agents, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, patient disposition, and 30-day readmission rate. During the study period, 21 patients received andexanet alfa and 35 received 4F-PCC. Hemostatic efficacy occurred in 64.7% of patients receiving andexanet alfa and 54.8% of receiving 4F-PCC. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 45.2% for 4F-PCC and 30% for andexanet alfa. Thrombotic events were higher with 4F-PCC (31.4%) compared to andexanet alfa (14.3%). Median time from presentation to administration of reversal agent was 2.67 [1.75-4.13] hours with andexanet alfa and 1.73 [1.21-3.55] hours with 4F-PCC. Discharge to skilled nursing facilities and 30-day readmission were similar between groups. In this cohort, reversal with andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC differed in terms ofhemostatic efficacy and thrombotic events after ICH in patients anticoagulated with apixaban or rivaroxaban.

Topics: Blood Coagulation Factors; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Using Scandinavian population-based registries, we assessed risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and bleeding with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in anticoagulation-naïve patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. This historical cohort study included 219 545 AF patients [median age 74 years; 43% women; mean CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) score 3.3] initiating apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden (1 January 2013 to 31 December 2016). The primary endpoints were stroke/SE and major bleeding. The median follow-up times were 9.7 (3.9-21.5) months for stroke/SE and 9.6 (3.8-21.3) months for bleeding. Apixaban and warfarin initiators were older and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores compared with dabigatran and rivaroxaban initiators. After 1:1 propensity score matching, three cohorts were created: apixaban-warfarin (n = 111 162), dabigatran-warfarin (n = 56 856), and rivaroxaban-warfarin (n = 61 198). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using a Cox regression. For stroke/SE, adjusted HRs against warfarin were 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-1.06] for apixaban, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80-1.00) for dabigatran, and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.92-1.14) for rivaroxaban. For major bleeding, the HRs against warfarin were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.78) for apixaban, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.97) for dabigatran, and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07-1.25) for rivaroxaban. The results in the dabigatran cohort did not hold in all dose-defined subgroups.. In this large Scandinavian study among AF patients initiating oral anticoagulation, those initiating dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban had similar rates of stroke/SE to patients initiating warfarin. Rates of major bleeding were lower with apixaban and dabigatran and higher with rivaroxaban, each compared with warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used worldwide. Little is known so far about their pharmacokinetics in emergency situations.. A prospective, observational registry was performed to determine the clinical course in consecutive patients with major bleeding or urgent surgery treated with DOACs. In samples collected as part of routine care DOAC drug concentrations were measured using ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anticoagulant intensity at first presentation and drug half-life (. A total of 140 patients were prospectively included. Pharmacokinetic data were available in 94% (132/140) of patients. Note that 67% (89/132) experienced life-threatening bleeding and 33% (43/132) needed an urgent surgery. For pharmacokinetic analysis a total of 605 blood samples was available. Median concentration on admission was 205 ng/mL for rivaroxaban and 108 ng/mL for apixaban. All treatment groups showed a high variation of drug concentrations at baseline. In rivaroxaban-treated patients. Emergency patients under DOAC treatment show a high variation of anticoagulant concentrations at baseline. Compared with rivaroxaban, apixaban showed a lower median concentration on admission and a longer

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban

Background Bleeding and thromboembolism prevention is important in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulants, including direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin. Asians have higher risks of bleeding complications when taking anticoagulants. However, evidence that considers laboratory parameters is lacking. Objective We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Setting Retrospective design using hospital-based data. Method This propensity score-matched cohort study included data extracted from the electronic medical records of the En Chu Kong Hospital Research Database. Main outcome measure Outcome measures were major bleeding and thromboembolism. Cox proportional hazard models were applied for evaluating hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results Among 1075 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, 687 and 388 were administered direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin, respectively. After propensity score matching, 264 patient pairs were selected. Compared with warfarin use, direct oral anticoagulant use was associated with similar risks for major bleeding and thromboembolism; however, the latter was associated with increased gastrointestinal bleeding risks (adjusted hazard ratio 3.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-11.39). Notably, an approximately 10 fold increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was observed in 0-6 month direct oral anticoagulant users (adjusted hazard ratio 10.13, 95% confidence interval 1.27-80.89). Conclusion Direct oral anticoagulant use was not associated with major bleeding and thromboembolism occurrence in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, direct oral anticoagulant use was associated with increased gastrointestinal bleeding risks, especially when used within 0-6 months of direct oral anticoagulant use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

This study assesses the mortality outcomes of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation (AF).. Medical records of cancer patients receiving NOACs for VTE or AF between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, were retrieved from Taiwan's National Health Institute Research Database. NOACs were compared using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. The primary outcome was cancer-related death. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.. Among 202,754 patients who received anticoagulants, 3591 patients (dabigatran: 907; rivaroxaban: 2684) with active cancers were studied. Patients who received dabigatran were associated with lower risks of cancer-related death at one year (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54-0.93) and at the end of follow-ups (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64-0.98) compared with rivaroxaban. Patients who received dabigatran were also associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67-0.97), major bleeding (HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.47-0.88), and GI bleeding (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.39-0.84) at the end of follow-ups compared with rivaroxaban.. Compared with rivaroxaban, the use of dabigatran may be associated with a lower risk of cancer-related death and all-cause mortality.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Taiwan; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the prevention of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, the differences in safety and effectiveness among four DOACs, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, in Japanese patients have not been clarified. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to directly compare the safety and effectiveness among the four DOACs using the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) claims database. We identified 3823 patients with NVAF who started receiving a DOAC between March 2011 and June 2017. The safety outcome was major bleeding (a composite outcome of intracranial, gastrointestinal, respiratory, or renal/urinary tract bleeding) and the effectiveness outcome was the composite of ischemic stroke including transient ischemic attack (TIA) or systemic embolism. We constructed a Cox proportional hazard model to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for all four DOAC combinations. The risk of major bleeding was significantly lower in the dabigatran group than in the apixaban group (HR, 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31-0.93; p = 0.03). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the risk of major bleeding among the other DOACs. In the composite risk of ischemic stroke including TIA or systemic embolism, there was no significant difference among the four DOACs. This study suggested that in the current use of DOACs in Japanese patients with NVAF, dabigatran had a significantly lower risk of major bleeding than apixaban, but there was no significant difference in effectiveness among the four DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Ischemic Stroke; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Limited data exist regarding the safety of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve blockade (US-FNB) in patients with hip fractures treated with anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC).. To compare the safety outcomes of US-FNB to conventional analgesia in patients with hip fractures treated with anti-Xa DOAC.. This observational exploratory prospective study included 69 patients who presented to our emergency department (ED) in 3 years with hip fracture and who were treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban. Patients received either a US-FNB (n=19) or conventional analgesics (n=50) based on their preference and, and the presence of a trained ED physician qualified in performing US-FNB. Patients were observed for major bleeding events during and 30 days after hospitalization. The degree of preoperative pain and opioid use were also observed.. We found no significant difference in the number of major bleeding events between groups (47.4% vs. 54.0%, P = 0.84). Degree of pain measured 3 and 12 hours after presentation was found to be lower in the US-FNB group (median visual analog scale of pain improvement from baseline of -5 vs. -3 (P = 0.002) and -5 vs.-4 (P = 0.023), respectively. Opioid administration pre-surgery was found to be more than three times more common in the conventional analgesia group (26.3% vs.80%, P < 0.0001).. Regarding patients treated with Anti-Xa DOAC, US-FNB was not associated with an increase in major bleeding events compared to conventional analgesia, although it was an effective means of pain alleviation. Larger scale randomized controlled trials are required to determine long-term safety and efficacy.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Cohort Studies; Emergency Service, Hospital; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Femoral Nerve; Hemorrhage; Hip Fractures; Humans; Male; Nerve Block; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Early bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with increased risk of death and myocardial infarction; however, the association between bleeding and subsequent major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) remains unclear in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. We thus aimed to investigate this association.. The AFIRE trial (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease) was a multicenter, open-label trial conducted in Japan. This post hoc analysis included 2215 patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease treated with rivaroxaban or rivaroxaban plus an antiplatelet agent. MACCE was defined as a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death from any cause. The association of bleeding with subsequent MACCE risk was investigated using time-adjusted Cox multivariate analysis after adjusting for baseline characteristics and time from bleeding. Bleeding events were classified according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria.. Among the 2215 patients, 386 (17.4%) had bleeding during follow-up, of whom 63 (16.3%) also experienced MACCE; MACCE incidence was higher in patients with bleeding than in those without (8.38% versus 4.20% per patient-year; hazard ratio, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.49-2.70];. In patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease, major bleeding was strongly associated with subsequent MACCE. Thus, it is important to prevent major bleeding to avoid cardiovascular events and death. Registration: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr; Unique identifier: UMIN000016612. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02642419. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Factor VIIa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

To compare clinical outcomes of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and concurrent obesity and diabetes.. Patients aged ≥18 years were identified from a healthcare claims database with the following criteria: newly initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin, ≥1 medical claim with a diagnosis of AF, obesity determined by validated machine learning algorithm, and ≥1 claim with a diagnosis of diabetes or for antidiabetic medication. Treatment cohorts were matched using propensity scores and were compared for stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding using Cox proportional hazards models.. A total of 9999 matched pairs of NVAF patients with obesity and diabetes who initiated treatment with rivaroxaban or warfarin were included. The composite risk of stroke/SE was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban cohort compared with the warfarin cohort (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74-0.90). Risks of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes were also significantly reduced with rivaroxaban versus warfarin, but not SE. Major bleeding risk was similar between treatment cohorts (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.78-1.09).. In NVAF patients with comorbidities of obesity and diabetes, rivaroxaban was associated with lower risks of stroke/SE and similar risk of major bleeding versus warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Embolism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Obesity; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing, and effective anticoagulation therapy can prevent adverse events. Selecting the appropriate OAC based on patient characteristics has become a challenge. Interventions are going to be a potential area of focus.. To explore the discrepancies between clinician prescriptions and recommended guidelines of oral anticoagulants (OACs) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and to provide direction for improving anticoagulation strategies for treating patients with AF.. Data were collected from the electronic medical record system of Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital between July 2019 and January 2020. The suitability of prescribed OACs for patients with AF was assessed according to the Rules for Avoiding Prescription Inappropriateness, the prescribed medicine label, and any relevant antithrombotic guidelines for treating patients with AF.. A total of 460 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 53.7% received an appropriate prescription and 46.3% received an inappropriate prescription. Of the patients who received inappropriate prescriptions, 15.4% were prescribed without the presenting appropriate indicators, 1.3% were prescribed inappropriate drug selection, and 29.6% were prescribed inappropriate drug doses. For patients prescribed without providing appropriate indicators, 2.2% had no indication for medication and 13.3% had an indication for medication, but not a specific OAC. For patients with inappropriate drug selection, 1, 5 patients were on rivaroxaban, dabigatran respectively. The distribution of NOAC doses was as follows: dabigatran standard dose (45.2%), the low dose (54.8%). Rivaroxaban standard dose (58.9%), low dose (36.8%), high dose (4.3%). A total of 44 patients (9.6%) experienced bleeding events, 12 patients (2.6%) experienced embolic events, and 7 patients experienced other adverse events after dosing.. In clinical practice, it is common for patients with AF to receive inappropriate prescriptions of OACs. Therefore there is a need to enhance anticoagulation management in patients with AF to improve the appropriate use of OACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; China; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitals; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban

The use of direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban (XABANs) has rapidly increased; however, there is no validated test available to monitor the effect on hemostasis. This study aims to assess how hemostatic management based on the Rapid Thromboelastography (R-TEG) variable activated clotting time (ACT) of XABAN patients with ongoing bleedings or in need for acute surgical intervention, affected patient outcome. A total of 343 XABAN patients were included in the main analysis together with 50 healthy volunteers to validate the reference value for ACT. An ACT >120 s (s) was defined as having XABAN-induced coagulopathy. Sixty-five percent of the XABAN patients presented with R-TEG ACT within the normal reference. Patients with XABAN-induced coagulopathy had a significantly increased risk of severe bleeding. Significantly more patients with extra-cerebral bleeding (ECB) and ACT above 120 s were transfused with five red blood cell (RBC) units or more compared to patients with ACT at 120 s or below (17% vs. 3%,

Topics: Blood Coagulation Disorders; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Thrombelastography

The aim of the study was to investigate a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method for the determination of rivaroxaban and evaluate the correlation between plasma concentration and anti-Xa activity in patients using oral rivaroxaban.. In this study, the plasma concentration of rivaroxaban and anti-Xa factor activities was determined in 125 patients, and the relationship between the two variables was analysed by SPSS 21.0 software.. The results showed that the plasma concentrations of oral rivaroxaban patients were significantly correlated with the activity of the anti-Xa factor (Spearman's r = 0.990, P < 0.05).. The plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban are a potentially useful monitoring indicator to assess the patient's bleeding risk if testing for plasma anti-Xa activity is not available.

Topics: Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Several direct oral anticoagulants have been developed to prevent cardiogenic thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation, on the other hand, have the complication of bleeding. Since clinical course after bleeding with direct oral anticoagulant remains unclear, the present retrospective cohort study was to clarify the course after hemorrhage among patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants. Among all 2005 patients prescribed dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban between April 2011 and June 2017, subjects comprised 96 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who experienced relevant bleeding during direct oral anticoagulant therapy (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 or above). The clinical course after hemorrhage was reviewed to examine whether rebleeding or thrombotic events occurred up to the end of December 2019. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most frequent cause of initial bleeding (57 patients, 59%). Rebleeding occurred in 11 patients (4.5%/year), with gastrointestinal bleeding in 10 and subarachnoid hemorrhage in 1. All rebleeding occurred in patients who resumed anticoagulation therapy. Another significant factor related with rebleeding included past history of gastrointestinal bleeding. On the other hand, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred in 6 patients older than 75 years old or more (2.5%/year), with systemic thrombosis in 4 and cardiac death in 2. All 4 patients with systemic thrombosis withheld anticoagulants after index bleeding, although only 10 patients withheld anticoagulation therapy. Rebleeding should be taken care of when anticoagulants are resumed after bleeding, particularly among patients who initially experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. Systemic thrombosis occurred at a high rate when anticoagulant therapy was withheld after bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thrombosis

The comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban and apixaban, the most frequently prescribed oral anticoagulants for ischemic stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, is uncertain.. To compare major ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban.. Retrospective cohort study using computerized enrollment and claims files for US Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older. Between January 1, 2013, and November 30, 2018, a total of 581 451 patients with atrial fibrillation began rivaroxaban or apixaban treatment and were followed up for 4 years, through November 30, 2018.. Rivaroxaban (n = 227 572) and apixaban (n = 353 879), either standard or reduced dose.. The primary outcome was a composite of major ischemic (stroke/systemic embolism) and hemorrhagic (intracerebral hemorrhage/other intracranial bleeding/fatal extracranial bleeding) events. Secondary outcomes were nonfatal extracranial bleeding and total mortality (fatal ischemic/hemorrhagic event or other death during follow-up). Rates, hazard ratios (HRs), and rate differences (RDs) were adjusted for baseline differences in comorbidity with inverse probability of treatment weighting.. Study patients (mean age, 77.0 years; 291 966 [50.2%] women; 134 393 [23.1%] receiving reduced dose) had 474 605 person-years of follow-up (median [IQR] of 174 [62-397] days). The adjusted primary outcome rate for rivaroxaban was 16.1 per 1000 person-years vs 13.4 per 1000 person-years for apixaban (RD, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.9-3.5]; HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12-1.24]). The rivaroxaban group had increased risk for both major ischemic events (8.6 vs 7.6 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.5-1.7]; HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.04-1.20]) and hemorrhagic events (7.5 vs 5.9 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.1]; HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.16-1.36]), including fatal extracranial bleeding (1.4 vs 1.0 per 1000 person-years; RD, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2-0.7]; HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.18-1.70]). Patients receiving rivaroxaban had increased risk of nonfatal extracranial bleeding (39.7 vs 18.5 per 1000 person-years; RD, 21.1 [95% CI, 20.0-22.3]; HR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.99-2.15]), fatal ischemic/hemorrhagic events (4.5 vs 3.3 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8-1.6]; HR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.21-1.48]), and total mortality (44.2 vs 41.0 per 1000 person-years; RD, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.8-4.5]; HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02-1.09]). The risk of the primary outcome was increased for rivaroxaban in both those receiving the reduced dose (27.4 vs 21.0 per 1000 person-years; RD, 6.4 [95% CI, 4.1-8.7]; HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.16-1.40]) and the standard dose (13.2 vs 11.4 per 1000 person-years; RD, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.0-2.6]; HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.06-1.21]) groups.. Among Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with atrial fibrillation, treatment with rivaroxaban compared with apixaban was associated with a significantly increased risk of major ischemic or hemorrhagic events.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The combination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with  rivaroxaban may result in a dual interaction (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic) depending on the type of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor employed (CYP3A4-inhibiting vs. non-CYP3A4 inhibiting).  The purpose of this study was to use real world data to determine if the type of  selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used plays a role in the risk and severity of bleeding in patients receiving rivaroxaban. Method: This was a single-center retrospective longitudinal observational study carried out between January 2016 and February 2020 in patients aged 18 years or older treated concurrently with rivaroxaban (prescribed for treatments) and a selective serotonin reuptake  nhibitor. Patients were divided into two groups according to the selective  serotonin reuptake inhibitor they received, i.e., a CYP3A4 inhibitor (group 1):  sertraline, fluoxetine and paroxetine, or a non-CYP3A4 inhibitor (group 2): citalopram and escitalopram. We analyzed the bleeding events and  everity, the daily dose of rivaroxaban used and the medication administered concomitantly.. A total of 146 patients were included (89 in group 1 and 57 in group  2) and 35 bleeding events (24% of patients) were identified, of  which 12 were  major and 23 were minor. The bleeding rate was higher in group 1  (25.8% vs 21.0%) but there were no differences in major bleeding (10.1% vs  5.3%; p = 0.235) or minor bleeding (13.5% vs 15.8%; p = 0.496). The  bleeding rate with a daily rivaroxaban dose of 20 mg was 9% (8/89) in group 1  and 14% (8/57) in group 2 (p = 0.2137), as compared with 16.9% (15/89)  in group 1 versus 7% (4/57) in group 2 (p = 0.042) for a daily 15 mg dose.. Although the type of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used  concurrently with rivaroxaban was not found to influence the patients' bleeding  risk, a significant increase in the risk of bleeding was  bserved based on the dose of rivaroxaban used.. La combinación de rivaroxabán e inhibidores selectivos de la recaptación de serotonina presenta un riesgo de interacción  farmacodinámica y farmacocinética que depende del tipo de inhibidor selectivo  de la recaptación de serotonina empleado, ya que algunos son inhibidores del  citocromo p450, mientras que otros no lo son. El objetivo del presente estudio  fue evaluar con datos de vida real si el tipo de inhibidor selectivo de la  recaptación de serotonina utilizado influye en la frecuencia y en la gravedad de  sangrado en pacientes anticoagulados con rivaroxabán. Método: Estudio observacional, longitudinal, retrospectivo y unicéntrico, realizado entre enero de 2016 y febrero de 2020 en pacientes ≥  18 años que recibían rivaroxabán, en indicaciones autorizadas y financiadas, y  que estaban siendo tratados concomitantemente con inhibidores selectivos de  la recaptación de serotonina. Se establecieron dos cohortes en función del  inhibidor selectivo de la recaptación de serotonina coadministrado: inhibidores  del CYP3A4 (grupo 1) —sertralina, fluoxetina y paroxetina—, y no inhibidores  del CYP3A4 (grupo 2) —citalopram y escitalopram—. Se analizaron los eventos  hemorrágicos, la gravedad del sangrado, la dosis diaria de rivaroxabán y la  medicación concomitante que pudiese influir en el riesgo de sangrado.. Se incluyeron 146 pacientes (89 en el grupo 1 y 57 en el grupo  2) y se identificaron un total de 35 eventos hemorrágicos (24% de los  pacientes), de los que 12 fueron eventos mayores y 23 menores. La frecuencia  de sangrado fue ligeramente mayor en el grupo 1 que en el 2 (25,8% versus 21%), pero no se encontraron diferencias significativas entre  ambos grupos, ni tampoco en la frecuencia de sangrados mayores  (10,1% versus 5,3%; p = 0,235) o menores (13,5% versus 15,8%; p =  0,496). La frecuencia de eventos hemorrágicos con la dosis de 20 mg fue del  9% (8/89) en el grupo 1 y del 14% (8/57) en el grupo 2 (p = 0,2137), mientras que con una dosis de 15 mg la frecuencia de eventos fue del 16,9% (15/89) en el grupo 1 y del 7% (4/57) en el grupo 2 (p = 0,042).. No se han hallado diferencias significativas en el riesgo de  sangrado según el tipo de inhibidor selectivo de la recaptación de serotonina  que se administre de forma concomitante al rivaroxabán. Sí se han observado  diferencias significativas en función de la dosis de rivaroxabán utilizada.

Topics: Adolescent; Citalopram; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Patient frailty amongst patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is associated with adverse health outcomes and increased risk of mortality. Additional evidence is needed to evaluate effective and safe NVAF treatment in this patient population.. This subgroup analysis of the ARISTOPHANES study compared the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (S/SE) and major bleeding (MB) amongst frail NVAF patients prescribed nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or warfarin.. This comparative retrospective observational study of frail, older NVAF patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or warfarin from 01JAN2013-30SEP2015 was conducted using Medicare and 3 US commercial claims databases. To compare each drug, 6 propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts were created. Patient cohorts were pooled from 4 databases after PSM. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of S/SE and MB.. Amongst NVAF patients, 34% (N = 150 487) met frailty criteria. Apixaban and rivaroxaban were associated with a lower risk of S/SE vs warfarin (apixaban: HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55-0.69; rivaroxaban: HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72-0.87). For MB, apixaban (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57-0.66) and dabigatran (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.89) were associated with a lower risk and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.21) was associated with a higher risk vs warfarin.. Amongst this cohort of frail NVAF patients, NOACs were associated with varying rates of stroke/SE and MB compared with warfarin. Due to the lack of real-world data regarding OAC treatment in frail patients, these results may inform clinical practice in the treatment of this patient population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Frail Elderly; Hemorrhage; Humans; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Vitamin K; Warfarin

The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has broadened the treatment arsenal for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, but observational studies on the benefit-risk balance of DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are needed. The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of major bleeding in DOAC users using longitudinal data collected from electronic health care databases from 4 different EU-countries analysed with a common study protocol.. A cohort study was conducted among new users (≥18 years) of DOACs or VKAs with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation using data from the UK, Spain, Germany and Denmark. The incidence of major bleeding events (overall and by bleeding site) was compared between current use of DOACs and VKAs. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and adjust for confounders.. Overall, 251 719 patients were included across the 4 study cohorts (mean age ~75 years, % females between 41.3 and 54.3%), with overall hazard ratios of major bleeding risk for DOACs vs VKAs ranging between 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90) in Denmark and 1.13 (95% CI 1.02-1.25) in the UK. When stratifying according to the bleeding site, risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was increased by 48-67% in dabigatran users and 30-50% for rivaroxaban users compared to VKA users in all data sources except Denmark. Compared to VKAs, apixaban was not associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in all data sources and seemed to be associated with the lowest risk of major bleeding events compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Germany; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke; Vitamin K

Postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB) is the most common adverse event after colorectal polypectomy. Use of anticoagulants is an important risk factor for PPB. This study aimed to evaluate PPB in patients receiving treatment with warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. Between August 2017 and July 2019, 5449 patients with 12,601 polyps who underwent endoscopic snare resection of colorectal polyps were enrolled. Endoscopic snare resection was performed in patients receiving continuous warfarin (C-warfarin) and in patients who experienced 1 day cessation of (O-) of DOACs in accordance with the Japanese Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines.. The PPB rate in the group receiving anticoagulants was statistically higher than that in the group without anticoagulants (8.5% [33/387] vs 1.2% [63/5,062], respectively; P < .001). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, male gender (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; P = .007), warfarin (OR, 4.64; P < .001), DOACs (OR, 6.59; P < .001), and multipolyp removal (OR, 1.77; P = .007) were significant risk factors for PPB. PPB was observed in 9 and 21 patients in the C-warfarin and O-DOACs groups, respectively: C-warfarin (8.0% [9/113]), O-dabigatran (6.1% [2/33]), O-rivaroxaban (14.8% [9/61]), O-apixaban (9.8% [9/92]), and O-edoxaban (1.8% [1/56]). The PPB rate with the O-edoxaban group was significantly lower than that with the O-rivaroxaban group (P < .05).. Use of anticoagulant therapy was an independent risk factor for PPB. The rates of PPB in patients receiving C-warfarin and O-DOACs were also higher than those in patients not receiving anticoagulants. Edoxaban may be safe through short-term withdrawal in patients undergoing endoscopic snare resection of colorectal polyps.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Colonic Polyps; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is the preferred treatment in secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). The aim of this study was to investigate possible risk factors associated with major bleeding in VTE-patients treated with NOACs. In this retrospective register-based study we screened the Swedish anticoagulation register Auricula (during 2012.01.01-2017.12.31) to find patients and used other national registers for outcomes. Primary endpoint was major bleeding defined as bleeding leading to hospital care. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis was used to reveal risk factors. 18 219 patients with NOAC due to VTE were included. 85.6% had their first VTE, mean age was 69.4 years and median follow-up time was 183 days. The most common NOAC was rivaroxaban (54.8%), followed by apixaban (42.0%), dabigatran (3.2%) and edoxaban (0.1%). The rate of major bleeding was 6.62 (95% CI 6.19-7.06) per 100 treatment years in all patients and 11.27 (CI 9.96-12.57) in patients above 80 years of age. Statistically independent risk factors associated with major bleeding were age (normalized HR 1.38, CI 1.27-1.50), earlier major bleeding (HR 1.58, Cl 1.09-2.30), COPD (HR 1.28, CI 1.04-1.60) and previous stroke (HR 1.28, Cl 1.03-1.58) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (HR 1.33, Cl 1.01-1.76). Prior warfarin treatment was protective (HR 0.67, CI 0.58-0.78). This real world cohort shows a high bleeding rate especially among the elderly and in patients with previous major bleeding, COPD and previous stroke or TIA. This should be considered when deciding on treatment duration and NOAC dose in these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening disease usually related to different underlying clinical conditions. The risk of SVT recurrences is high over time in patients with an underlying permanent prothrombotic condition. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) represent the mainstay of treatment for SVT. Data about the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are reported in the literature for the treatment of acute SVT, but less is known about their application for the secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of long-term DOACs therapy in patients at high-risk of thrombosis, compared to VKA.. This is a retrospective single-centre study including 70 patients with SVT on long-term anticoagulant treatment with VKA followed-up at our Units between January 2017 and December 2019. All the patients were at high thrombotic risk defined as the presence of a permanent prothrombotic condition requiring long-term anticoagulation. During follow-up, 28 patients were shifted to DOACs and their clinical outcomes were compared to those of the patients who continued VKA therapy. All the arterial and venous thrombotic events of the splanchnic and extra-splanchnic districts as well as the haemorrhagic adverse events occurring during follow-up were recorded.. Of the seventy patients enrolled in the study, 36 patients (51.4%) had a single-segment involvement thrombosis (28.5% of portal vein, 7.1% of superior mesenteric vein, 4.3% of splenic vein, 11.5% of hepatic veins) and 34 patients (48.6%) had multi-segment involvement at the time of diagnosis. 42 patients (60%) continued VKA therapy and 28 (40%) were switched to DOACs. Median follow-up was 6 years (range 2-8) during VKA and 1.9 years (range 1-5.2) during DOACs. The incidence of thrombotic events was similar between patients on VKA and those on DOACs. Patients on VKA developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and of the patients on DOACs 1 developed NSTEMI and 1 DVT. No major haemorrhagic events occurred. Minor bleedings occurred in 26% of patients on VKA and in none of the DOACs patients (P: 0.09).. Our results highlight that DOACs could represent an effective and safe alternative to the VKA for secondary prophylaxis in SVT patients at high risk of thrombosis.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Adult; Anticoagulants; Budd-Chiari Syndrome; Duration of Therapy; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mesenteric Ischemia; Middle Aged; Portal Vein; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Recently, guidelines recommended the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common post-surgical complication of cardiac surgery, but the efficacy and safety of DOAC for POAF have rarely been investigated. We conducted a prospective observational study to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOAC administered immediately after POAF.. In all, 135 patients that experienced POAF after cardiac surgery were treated with a DOAC. Primary endpoints were either bleeding or thromboembolic events. Secondary endpoints included changes in hemoglobin (Hb), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), serum creatinine (sCr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and pleural/pericardial effusion.. Patients were treated with apixaban (n = 31), edoxaban (n = 87), and rivaroxaban (n = 17). Major bleeding (p = 0.011) and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (p = 0.047) were significantly more frequent in the rivaroxaban group. Stroke was observed in one rivaroxaban group patient and none in the other two groups.. DOAC as anticoagulation therapy for the early intervention of POAF following cardiac surgery is associated with a low incidence of major bleeding; a favorable safety profile and excellent efficacy were demonstrated for DOAC. Furthermore, our results indicate that the safety and efficacy of apixaban and edoxaban are better than rivaroxaban.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), rivaroxaban was not inferior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism. However, a comparative evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban and warfarin therapies for NVAF patients at different renal function levels has not yet been reported, and this study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in Chinese NVAF patients with CKD.. A Markov model was constructed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lifetime costs associated with the use of rivaroxaban relative to warfarin in patients with NVAF at different estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels as follows: 30 to <50, 50 to <80 and ≥80 mL/min. Input parameters were sourced from the clinical literature. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model uncertainty.. The incrementalQALYs with rivaroxaban was slightly increased by approximately 0.3 QALY as compared with that with warfarin in all the subgroups, resulting in an ICER of $9,736/QALY (eGFR, 30 to <50 mL/min), $9,758/QALY (50 to <80 mL/min) and $9,969/QALY (≥80 mL/min). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested a chance of >80% that the ICER would be lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of three times the GDP of China in 2019 in all the subgroups. Results were consistent even under the assumption of anticoagulant discontinuation after major bleeding events. The model was most sensitive to event-free-related utility and survival rates.. The existing evidence supports the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban therapy as an alternative anticoagulant to warfarin for patients with NVAF at different renal function levels.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Health Expenditures; Hemorrhage; Humans; Models, Econometric; Polyketides; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants have been evaluated in the general population, but proper evidence for their safe use in the geriatric population is still missing. We compared the bleeding risk of a direct oral anticoagulant (rivaroxaban) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) among French geriatric patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) aged ≥80 years.. We performed a sequential observational prospective cohort study, using data from 33 geriatric centres. The sample comprised 908 patients newly initiated on VKAs between September 2011 and September 2014 and 995 patients newly initiated on rivaroxaban between September 2014 and September 2017. Patients were followed up for up to 12 months. One-year risks of major, intracerebral, gastrointestinal bleedings, ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality were compared between rivaroxaban-treated and VKA-treated patients with propensity score matching and Cox models.. Major bleeding risk was significantly lower in rivaroxaban-treated patients (7.4/100 patient-years) compared with VKA-treated patients (14.6/100 patient-years) after multivariate adjustment (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.99) and in the propensity score-matched sample (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.85). Intracerebral bleeding occurred less frequently in rivaroxaban-treated patients (1.3/100 patient-years) than in VKA-treated patients (4.0/100 patient-years), adjusted HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.24 to 1.44) and in the propensity score-matched sample HR 0.26 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.80). Major lower bleeding risk was largely driven by lower risk of intracerebral bleeding.. Our study findings indicate that bleeding risk, largely driven by lower risk of intracerebral bleeding, is lower with rivaroxaban than with VKA in stroke prevention in patients ≥80 years old with non-valvular AF.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; France; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Mortality; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban reduces the risk of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, who often also receive antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) to maintain sinus rhythm. Current guidelines contraindicate concomitant use of rivaroxaban with the popular AAD dronedarone, despite little data demonstrating interactions with AADs. This study investigates the outcomes of concomitant rivaroxaban and AAD drug use in a real-world cohort.. This retrospective study included 1777 non-permanent AF patients taking rivaroxaban for ≥ 1 month between 2011 and 2016 from a multicenter cohort in Taiwan, and compared concomitant AAD use against clinical outcome endpoints for safety, effectiveness, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to evaluate the association between concomitant AAD use and outcomes.. Patients were divided into rivaroxaban alone (n = 1205) and with concomitant amiodarone (n = 177), dronedarone (n = 231), or propafenone (n = 164) groups. The proportion of patients using rivaroxaban 10 mg was highest in the concomitant dronedarone group: rivaroxaban alone, 53.6%; with amiodarone, 57.6%; with dronedarone, 77.1%; and with propafenone, 46.3% (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidences of safety (p = 0.892), effectiveness (p = 0.336), and MACE (p = 0.674) were similar between the four groups; however, there were significantly fewer new systemic thromboembolisms in the dronedarone group: rivaroxaban alone, 2.5%; with amiodarone, 0.6%; with dronedarone, 0%; and with propafenone, 1.2% (p = 0.029). The all-cause death rate was also lowest in the dronedarone group: rivaroxaban alone, 9.0%; with amiodarone, 9.6%; with dronedarone, 3.0%; and with propafenone: 6.1% (p = 0.013). After covariate adjustment, there were no differences in the safety, effectiveness, and MACE endpoints between patients receiving or not receiving AADs.. Concomitant use of rivaroxaban with AADs appears to be well tolerated, warranting further investigation into the apparent benefits of a reduced dose of rivaroxaban combined with dronedarone.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dronedarone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Propafenone; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Taiwan

The aim was to compare the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban and warfarin as anticoagulants for treating patients with post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with chronic iliofemoral venous occlusion undergoing iliofemoral venous stenting.. This single institution retrospective study analysed patients with PTS with chronic iliofemoral venous occlusion who were prescribed rivaroxaban or warfarin for one year after successfully undergoing iliofemoral venous stenting. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were bleeding complication rate and primary patency rate at one year. Secondary outcomes included Villalta score, symptom recurrence rate, ulcer healing rate, and clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR) rate during follow up.. From January 2016 to December 2017, 154 legs from 154 patients were included in this study (69 in rivaroxaban group and 85 in warfarin group). The groups were well matched for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and procedural details. There was no significant difference between the rivaroxaban group and warfarin group in bleeding complication rate (10% vs. 16%, p = .23, hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25 - 1.37) at one year, as well as major bleeding complication rate (0% vs. 2%, p = .20, HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.01 - 2.61) and minor bleeding complication rate (10% vs. 14%, p = .40, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.27 - 1.66). The primary patency rate was higher in the rivaroxaban group at one year (84% vs. 71%, p = .049, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26 - 0.96) and at two years (79% vs. 63%, p = .037, HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 - 0.93). At a mean follow up of 24 months (range 1 - 42 months), the rivaroxaban group had a significantly lower post-operative Villalta score (4.87 ± 3.51 vs. 6.88 ± 5.85, p = .010, t = 2.64, 95% CI 0.50 - 3.52), lower rate of symptom recurrence (4% vs. 32%, p < .001), lower CD-TLR rates (3% vs. 13%, p = .039), and higher ulcer healing rate (90% vs. 59%, p = .004) than the warfarin group.. For PTS patients with chronic iliofemoral venous occlusion undergoing iliofemoral venous stenting, rivaroxaban probably exhibited similar safety but superior efficacy to warfarin. However, further prospective control studies with large sample size are necessary to confirm the results.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Chronic Disease; Databases, Factual; Endovascular Procedures; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Femoral Vein; Hemorrhage; Humans; Iliac Vein; Male; Middle Aged; Postthrombotic Syndrome; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) starter packs are designed for unique treatment dosing for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Inappropriate use of 30-day DOAC starter packs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) may increase the risk for bleeding events given higher dosing in the first 1-3 weeks of treatment. A retrospective analysis of medical and outpatient pharmacy claims data from 2015 to 2018 in Optum's De-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart was performed. Patients greater than 18 years of age with AF and a new prescription of apixaban or rivaroxaban were included. Patients with an acute VTE were excluded. The main outcome of interest was adverse events (emergency department [ED] visits, hospitalizations, and deaths within 90 days after prescription fill date) associated with inappropriate DOAC starter pack prescription. A total of 90,950 DOAC-treated patients with AF were identified. The mean age was 74.5 years (SD 10.0) and 42,717 (47.0%) were female. Inappropriate starter packs were used by 117 (0.1%) patients, who were younger than non-starter pack patients (71.3 years vs. 74.5 years). Patients who received an inappropriate DOAC prescription were more likely to identify as Black (12.0% vs. 8.8%). Rates of ED visits, hospitalizations, and deaths overall were numerically lower in patients with starter pack compared to non-starter pack DOAC prescriptions. In contrast, rates of ED visits and hospitalizations related to significant bleeding were numerically higher in patients with starter pack compared to non-starter pack DOAC prescriptions. Among patients with AF but no VTE, those who received an inappropriate DOAC starter pack had numerically higher rates of severe bleeding leading to ED visits and hospitalizations compared to those prescribed an appropriate non-starter pack DOAC anticoagulant.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prescriptions; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are hydrophilic drugs with plasma levels inversely proportional to lean body mass. Sarcopenic patients with low muscle mass may be at risk for supra-therapeutic DOAC levels and bleeding complications. We therefore sought to examine the influence of lean body mass on DOAC levels in older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF).. A prospective cohort study was conducted with patients 65 years of age or more receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban for AF. Appendicular lean mass (ALM) was measured using a bioimpedance device and a dual X-ray absorptiometry scanner. DOAC levels were measured using a standardized anti-Xa assay 4 hours after (peak) and 1 hour before (trough) ingestion.. The cohort consisted of 62 patients (47% female, 77.0 ± 6.1 years). The prescribed DOACs were apixaban 2.5 mg (21%), apixaban 5 mg (53%), and rivaroxaban 20 mg (26%). Overall, 16% had supra-therapeutic DOAC levels at trough and 25% at peak. In the multivariable logistic regression model, lower ALM was independently associated with supra-therapeutic DOAC levels at trough (odds ratio per ↓ 1-kg 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.49) and peak (odds ratio per ↓ 1-kg 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.37). Addition of ALM to a model consisting of age, total body weight, and renal function resulted in improved discrimination for supra-therapeutic DOAC levels.. Our proof-of-concept study has identified an association between ALM and DOAC levels in older adults with AF. Further research is needed to determine the impact of ALM on bleeding complications and the potential role of ALM-guided dosing for sarcopenic patients.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Body Mass Index; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Monitoring; Electric Impedance; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Proof of Concept Study; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Sarcopenia; Stroke; Thinness

Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation as the mainstay of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) treatment in cirrhosis. However, because of the heterogeneity of PVT, anticoagulation alone does not always achieve satisfactory results. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate an individualized management algorithm using a wait-and-see strategy (i.e., no treatment), anticoagulation, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to treat PVT in cirrhosis.. Between February 2014 and June 2018, 396 consecutive patients with cirrhosis with nonmalignant PVT were prospectively included in a tertiary care center, of which 48 patients (12.1%) were untreated, 63 patients (15.9%) underwent anticoagulation, 88 patients (22.2%) underwent TIPS, and 197 patients (49.8%) received TIPS plus post-TIPS anticoagulation. The decision of treatment option mainly depends on the stage of liver disease (symptomatic portal hypertension or not) and degree and extension of thrombus.. During a median 31.7 months of follow-up period, 312 patients (81.3%) achieved partial (n = 25) or complete (n = 287) recanalization, with 9 (3.1%) having rethrombosis, 64 patients (16.2%) developed major bleeding (anticoagulation-related bleeding in 7 [1.8%]), 88 patients (22.2%) developed overt hepatic encephalopathy, and 100 patients (25.3%) died. In multivariate competing risk regression models, TIPS and anticoagulation were associated with a higher probability of recanalization. Long-term anticoagulation using enoxaparin or rivaroxaban rather than warfarin was associated with a decreased risk of rethrombosis and an improved survival, without increasing the risk of bleeding. However, the presence of complete superior mesenteric vein thrombosis was associated with a lower recanalization rate, increased risk of major bleeding, and poor prognosis.. In patients with cirrhosis with PVT, the individualized treatment algorithm achieves a high-probability recanalization, with low rates of portal hypertensive complications and adverse events.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Combined Modality Therapy; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Hepatic Encephalopathy; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Portal Vein; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Thrombosis; Warfarin; Watchful Waiting

Diabetes increases a patient's risk of developing atrial fibrillation by 49%. Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are at a fivefold increased risk of stroke and die more frequently from vascular causes. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with type 2 diabetes.. This was an analysis of Optum® De-Identified electronic health record data from 11/2010 to 12/2019. We included adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and type 2 diabetes, newly started on rivaroxaban or warfarin and with ≥ 12-months of prior electronic health record activity. Patients who were pregnant, had alternative indications for oral anticoagulation or valvular heart disease were excluded. We evaluated the incidence rate (%/year) of developing the composite outcome of stroke/systemic embolism or vascular death and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding as well as each endpoint individually. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using propensity score-overlap weighted proportional hazards regression.. We included 32,078 rivaroxaban (31% initiated on 15 mg dose) and 83,971warfarin users (time-in-therapeutic range = 47 ± 28%). Rivaroxaban was associated with a reduced risk of stroke/systemic embolism or vascular death (3.79 vs. 4.19; hazard ratio = 0.91, 95% confdience interval = 0.88-0.95), driven mostly by reductions in vascular death (2.81 vs 3.18, hazard ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval = 0.86-0.95) and systemic embolism (0.13 vs. 0.16; hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% confidence interval = 0.66-1.02). Major/clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was less frequent with rivaroxaban versus warfarin (2.17 vs. 2.31; hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval = 0.89-0.99) due to decreased critical organ bleeding (including intracranial hemorrhage) (0.35 vs. 0.54; hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval = 0.55-0.72).. In nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with type 2 diabetes, rivaroxaban was associated with an ~ 10% relative reduction in vascular mortality and fewer bleeding-related hospitalizations versus warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Electronic Health Records; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Real-world predictors of major bleeding (MB) have been well-studied among warfarin users, but not among all direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF). Thus, our goal was to build a predictive model of MB for new users of all oral anticoagulants (OAC) with AF.. We identified patients hospitalized for any cause and discharged alive in the community from 2011 to 2017 with a primary or secondary diagnosis of AF in Quebec's RAMQ and Med-Echo administrative databases. Cohort entry occurred at the first OAC claim. Patients were categorized according to OAC type. Outcomes were incident MB, gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), non-GI extracranial bleeding (NGIB) and intracranial bleeding within 1 year of follow-up. Covariates included age, sex, co-morbidities (within 3 years before cohort entry) and medication use (within 2 weeks before cohort entry). We used logistic-LASSO and adaptive logistic-LASSO regressions to identify MB predictors among OAC users. Discrimination and calibration were assessed for each model and a global model was selected. Subgroup analyses were performed for MB subtypes and OAC types.. Our cohort consisted of 14,741 warfarin, 3,722 dabigatran, 6,722 rivaroxaban and 11,196 apixaban users aged 70-86 years old. The important MB predictors were age, prior MB and liver disease with ORs ranging from 1.37-1.64. The final model had a c-statistic of 0.63 (95% CI 0.60-0.65) with adequate calibration. The GIB and NGIB models had similar c-statistics of 0.65 (95% CI 0.63-0.66) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.64-0.70), respectively.. MB and MB subtype predictors were similar among DOAC and warfarin users. The predictors selected by our models and their discriminative potential are concordant with published data. Thus, these models can be useful tools for future pharmacoepidemiologic studies involving older oral anticoagulant users with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Regression Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

To address literature gaps on treatment with real-world evidence, this study compared effectiveness, safety, and cost outcomes in NVAF patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease (CAD, PAD) prescribed apixaban versus other oral anticoagulants. NVAF patients aged ≥65 years co-diagnosed with CAD/PAD initiating warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban were selected from the US Medicare population (January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015). Propensity score matching was used to match apixaban versus warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban cohorts. Cox models were used to evaluate the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), all-cause mortality, and a composite of stroke/myocardial infarction/all-cause mortality. Generalized linear and two-part models were used to compare stroke/SE, MB, and all-cause costs between cohorts. A total of 33,269 warfarin-apixaban, 9,335 dabigatran-apixaban, and 33,633 rivaroxaban-apixaban pairs were identified after matching. Compared with apixaban, stroke/SE risk was higher in warfarin (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61 to 2.31), dabigatran (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.43), and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.51) patients. MB risk was higher in warfarin (HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.52 to 1.83), dabigatran (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.68), and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.71 to 2.05) patients vs apixaban. Stroke/SE- and MB-related medical costs per-patient per-month were higher in warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban patients versus apixaban. Total all-cause health care costs were higher in warfarin and rivaroxaban patients compared with apixaban patients. In conclusion, compared with apixaban, patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin had a higher risk of stroke/SE, MB, and event-related costs.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Coronary Artery Disease; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Health Care Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

This study aimed to evaluate the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) during daily clinical practice.. This was a prospective study conducted between January 01, 2016, and April 01, 2017, in patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of NVAF. We performed the study in 9 clinical centers from different regions of Turkey, and the mean follow-up period was 12+2 months. We investigated major and minor bleeding events of DOAC.. A total of 1807 patients with NVAF were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 73.6±10.2 years, CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.6±1.4, and HAS-BLED score was 2±1.2. The most frequently prescribed DOAC was dabigatran 110 mg bid in 409 (22.6%) patients. The patients on apixaban 2.5 mg bid were older (p<0.001). Patients on rivaroxaban 15 mg od also had a higher prevalence of chronic renal failure, 46 (16.7%) patients. A total of 205 (11.4%) bleeding events were observed; among these, 34 (1.9%) patients had major bleeding and 171 (9.4%) patients had minor bleeding. The major and minor bleeding events were 2/273 (0.7%) and 30/273 (10.9%) in patients receiving dabigatran 150 mg bid, 13/409 (3%) and 44/409 (10.7%) in patients receiving dabigatran 110 mg bid, 4/385 (1%) and 42/385 (10.9%) in patients receiving rivaroxaban 20 mg od, 8/276 (2.9%) and 27/276 (9.7%) in patients receiving rivaroxaban 15 mg od, 3/308 (0.9%) and 14/308 (4.5%) in patients receiving apixaban 5 mg bid, 4/156 (2.5%) and 14/156 (9%) in patients receiving apixaban 2.5 mg bid, respectively. The total bleeding events were 17 (5.6%) in patients receiving apixaban 5 mg, less than those receiving other DOACs. On multivariate analyses, rivaroxaban 20 mg od (p=0.002), ATRIA and HAS-BLED scores, and peripheral artery disease were independent indicators of bleeding. The most frequent location of major bleeding was the gastrointestinal system (GIS) [17 (0.9%) patients], and the most frequent location of minor bleeding was the gingiva [45 (2.5%) patients].. This study showed that similar results as the previous real-life study; however, we had some different results, such as the GIS tract bleeding was more frequent in patients receiving dabigatran 110 mg bid. The major and intracranial bleeding events were similar for different DOACs; and among DOACs, only rivaroxaban 20 mg od was associated with a high risk of bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The EXPAND Study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in routine clinical practice in Japan. This sub-analysis was conducted to reveal the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in Japanese NVAF patients according to baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) levels and rivaroxaban doses in the EXPAND Study. We examined 6806 patients whose baseline CrCl data were available and classified them into 2 groups: normal renal function group with CrCl ≥ 50 mL/min (n = 5326, 78%) and renal dysfunction group with CrCl < 50 mL/min (n = 1480, 22%). In the normal renal function group, 1609 (30%) received 10 mg/day (under-dose), while in the renal dysfunction group, 108 (7%) received 15 mg/day (over-dose). In the normal renal function group, under-dose of rivaroxaban was associated with higher all-cause mortality, while in the renal dysfunction group, over-dose was associated with higher incidence of major bleeding. In contrast, the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism was not different between the 2 groups regardless of the dose of rivaroxaban. In the propensity score matched analysis to adjust the difference in characteristics according to doses of rivaroxaban, the incidences of clinical outcomes were comparable between the 2 dose groups in both renal function groups. These results indicate that the dose of rivaroxaban should be reduced depending on the renal function, considering the balance between risks of bleeding and ischemia.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Kidney Diseases; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

Prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) is challenging. The advent of safer anticoagulation in the form of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has prompted exploration of prophylactic anticoagulation for all ESUS patients, rather than anticoagulating just those with documented atrial fibrillation (AF). However, recent trials have failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit, while observing increased bleeding. We modeled the economic impact of anticoagulating ESUS patients without documented AF across multiple geographies.. CRYSTAL-AF trial data were used to assess ischaemic stroke event rates in ESUS patients confirmed AF-free after long-term monitoring. Anticipated bleeding event rates (including both minor and major bleeds) with aspirin, dabigatran 150 mg, and rivaroxaban 20 mg were sourced from published meta-analyses, whilst a 30% ischaemic stroke reduction for both DOACs was assumed. Cost data for clinical events and pharmaceuticals were collected from the local payer perspective.. Compared with aspirin, dabigatran and rivaroxaban resulted in 17.9 and 29.9 additional bleeding events per 100 patients over a patient's lifetime, respectively. Despite incorporating into our model the proposed 30% reduction in ischaemic stroke risk, both DOACs were cost-additive over patient lifetime, as the costs of bleeding events and pharmaceuticals outweighed cost savings associated with the reduction in ischaemic strokes. DOACs added £5953-£7018 per patient (UK), €6683-€7368 (Netherlands), €4933-€9378 (Spain), AUD$5353-6539 (Australia) and $26,768-$32,259 (US) of payer cost depending on the agent prescribed. Additionally, in the U.S. patient pharmacy co-payments ranged from $2468-$12,844 depending on agent and patient plan. In all settings, cost-savings could not be demonstrated even when the modelling assumed 100% protection from recurrent ischaemic strokes, due to the very low underlying risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke in this population (1.27 per 100 patient-years).. Anticoagulation of non-AF patients may cause excess bleeds and add substantial costs for uncertain benefits, suggesting a personalised approach to anticoagulation in ESUS patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; Drug Costs; Embolic Stroke; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Models, Economic; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Direct oral anticoagulants have become a standard therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, little is known about their effectiveness/safety when prescribed by general practitioners to treat high-risk populations such as the elderly, those who are frail or have cognitive dysfunction.Methods and Results:In this multicenter, prospective study, a total of 5,717 NVAF patients (mean age 73.9 years) receiving rivaroxaban were registered by general practitioners, with a maximum 3-year follow up (mean 2.0±0.5 years). The primary endpoint was a composite of stroke and systemic embolism (SE). The annual incidence (per 100 person-years) of stroke/SE was 1.23% and for major bleeding, it was 0.63%. Multivariate analyses identified age ≥75 years (hazard ratio [HR]; 2.67, P<0.001) and history of ischemic stroke (HR; 1.89, P=0.005) as significant risk factors of stroke/SE, with history of major bleeding (HR; 14.9, P<0.001) and warfarin use (HR; 2.15, P=0.002) as risk factors for major bleeding events. Neither cognitive dysfunction, defined by the receipt of anti-dementia medications, nor frailty, evaluated by the classification of the Japanese Long-term Care Insurance system, correlated with stroke/SE or major bleeding events.. The low incidence of adverse events, including stroke/SE and bleeding, in patients prescribed rivaroxaban by general practitioners supports its use as a safe and efficacious treatment in the standard clinical care of high-risk patient populations.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; General Practitioners; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The clinical use of factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) for factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor reversal is derived from small studies with notable variation in patient eligibility for use, dosage regimens, concurrent supportive care, and outcome measures. Consequently, additional effectiveness and safety data are warranted to expand the literature evaluating FEIBA for FXa inhibitor reversal.. This study sought to determine the incidence of observed effective hemostasis within 24 hours of post-FEIBA® administration as well as in-hospital and 30-day post-discharge incidences of thromboembolic event (TEE) and mortality between apixaban and rivaroxaban in the intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and non-ICH populations.. This case series evaluated patients between January 1, 2014 through July 1, 2019 who received at least one FEIBA® dose for apixaban or rivaroxaban reversal secondary to acute ICH or non-ICH. Patient demographics, FEIBA® dosages, adjunct treatments, effectiveness, and safety outcomes were retrospectively collected from electronic medical record review. Modified hemostasis outcomes, adapted from criteria previously published by Sarode et al., TEE, and mortality between apixaban and rivaroxaban in the ICH and non-ICH populations were evaluated.. Among the 104 patients evaluated, 62 received apixaban and 42 rivaroxaban. Thirty apixaban and 25 rivaroxaban users experienced ICH, whereas 32 apixaban and 17 rivaroxaban users experienced non-ICH. Among the combined ICH and non-ICH populations, effective hemostasis occurred in 89%, TEE in 8%, and mortality in 13%. No statistically significant differences were observed within ICH and non-ICH populations receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban regarding effective hemostasis, TEE, or mortality.. The combined ICH and non-ICH overall rates of effective hemostasis, TEE, and mortality were comparable to preexisting studies of FEIBA for factor Xa inhibitor reversal. The limitations inherent to the study design warrant a randomized controlled trial with an active comparator to confirm these observations.

Topics: Aftercare; Blood Coagulation Factors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Discharge; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

It is unclear how many patients treated with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) are using concomitant acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, or aspirin) and how this affects clinical outcomes.. To evaluate the frequency and outcomes of prescription of concomitant ASA and DOAC therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolic disease (VTE).. This registry-based cohort study took place at 4 anticoagulation clinics in Michigan from January 2015 to December 2019. Eligible participants were adults undergoing treatment with a DOAC for AF or VTE, without a recent myocardial infarction (MI) or history of heart valve replacement, with at least 3 months of follow-up.. Use of ASA concomitant with DOAC therapy.. Rates of bleeding (any, nonmajor, major), rates of thrombosis (stroke, VTE, MI), emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and death.. Of the study cohort of 3280 patients (1673 [51.0%] men; mean [SD] age 68.2 [13.3] years), 1107 (33.8%) patients without a clear indication for ASA were being treated with DOACs and ASA. Two propensity score-matched cohorts, each with 1047 patients, were analyzed (DOAC plus ASA and DOAC only). Patients were followed up for a mean (SD) of 20.9 (19.0) months. Patients taking DOAC and ASA experienced more bleeding events compared with DOAC monotherapy (26.0 bleeds vs 31.6 bleeds per 100 patient years, P = .01). Specifically, patients undergoing combination therapy had significantly higher rates of nonmajor bleeding (26.1 bleeds vs 21.7 bleeds per 100 patient years, P = .02) compared with DOAC monotherapy. Major bleeding rates were similar between the 2 cohorts. Thrombotic event rates were also similar between the cohorts (2.5 events vs 2.3 events per 100 patient years for patients treated with DOAC and ASA compared with DOAC monotherapy, P = .80). Patients were more often hospitalized while undergoing combination therapy (9.1 vs 6.5 admissions per 100 patient years, P = .02).. Nearly one-third of patients with AF and/or VTE who were treated with a DOAC received ASA without a clear indication. Compared with DOAC monotherapy, concurrent DOAC and ASA use was associated with increased bleeding and hospitalizations but similar observed thrombosis rate. Future research should identify and deprescribe ASA for patients when the risk exceeds the anticipated benefit.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Real-world evidence is accumulating to support the idea that there are differences among the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The results of the study, discussed elsewhere in the NTvG, add to the growing body of evidence that while there is almost no difference in efficacy in prevention of the thromboembolic complications of non-valvular atrial fibrillation there are significant differences in safety. Apixaban is safer than rivaroxaban, with significantly less major bleeding, any bleeding or gastro-intestinal bleeding. Apixaban is probably the safest DOAC of the four available. These differences between DOACs with almost equal half-life are probably partly due to the differences in dosing interval: twice a day (BID) versus once a day (QD).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) pose a major bleeding risk, which may be increased or decreased by concomitant medications. To explore medications that affect the bleeding risk of OACs, we conducted a nested case-control study including 554 bleeding cases (warfarin, n = 327; direct OACs [DOACs], n = 227) and 1337 non-bleeding controls (warfarin, n = 814; DOACs, n = 523), using a Japanese health insurance database from January 2005 to June 2017. Major bleeding risk associated with exposure to concomitant medications within 30 d of the event/index date was evaluated, and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated using logistic regression analysis. Several antihypertensive drugs, such as amlodipine and bisoprolol, were associated with a decreased risk of bleeding (warfarin + amlodipine [aOR, 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-0.98], DOACs + bisoprolol [aOR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.80]). As hypertension is considered a significant risk factor for intracranial bleeding in antithrombotic therapy, antihypertensive drugs may suppress intracranial bleeding. In contrast, telmisartan, a widely used antihypertensive drug, was associated with an increased risk of bleeding [DOACs + telmisartan (aOR, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.84-12.91)]. Since telmisartan is an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), the elimination of rivaroxaban and apixaban, which are substrates of P-gp, is hindered, resulting in increased blood levels of both drugs, thereby increasing the risk of hemorrhage. In conclusion, antihypertensive drugs may improve the safety of OACs, and the pharmacokinetic-based drug interactions of DOACs must be considered.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Amlodipine; Anticoagulants; Antihypertensive Agents; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; Bisoprolol; Case-Control Studies; Drug Interactions; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Telmisartan; Warfarin

Reproductive tract bleeding (RTB) is an important outcome in menstruating females on anticoagulant therapy (AC). The diagnosis and management of AC-RTB in adolescent and young adult (AYA) females is unknown.. The aim of this study was to survey the contemporary patterns of diagnosis and management of AC-RTB in AYA females.. SurveyMonkey® questions were sent to members of 1) Pediatric and Neonatal Thrombosis Hemostasis Subcommittee and Women's Health Subcommittee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis and 2) Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society. Results are reported using descriptive statistics.. Response rate was 33% (251 out of 753). AC-RTB was infrequently reported. Menstrual history was not routinely reviewed prior to initiation of AC. Respondents indicated a differential risk of AC-RTB, most frequently with Rivaroxaban. Respondents continued hormonal therapy (HT) if an AYA female was on it at the start of AC. When AC-RTB occurred, management strategies were variable with initiation of HT or antifibrinolytic therapy being the most frequent. The timing of AC-RTB after the thrombotic event influenced the respondents' choice of therapy. Differences were seen in the management strategies between US and non-US participants, with more US respondents initiating HT while more non-US respondents modifying the AC regimen. Respondents uniformly reported complications with AC-RTB and with its treatment.. This survey highlights the need to review menstrual history at the start of and during AC and for future research into choosing the optimal AC in AYA females. The results can inform the design of future studies.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticoagulants; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Child; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Rivaroxaban; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban

This study aimed to analyze associations between genetic variants and the occurrence of clinical outcomes in dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban users. This was a retrospective real-world study linking genotype data of three Finnish biobanks with national register data on drug dispensations and healthcare encounters. We investigated several single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in the ABCG2, ABCB1, CES1, and CYP3A5 genes potentially associated with bleeding or thromboembolic events in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users based on earlier research. We used Cox regression models to compare the incidence of clinical outcomes between carriers and noncarriers of the SNVs or haplotypes. In total, 1,806 patients on apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban were studied. The ABCB1 c.3435C>T (p.Ile1145=, rs1045642) SNV (hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18-0.98, P = 0.044) and 1236T-2677T-3435T (rs1128503-rs2032582-rs1045642) haplotype (HR 0.44, 95% CI, 0.20-0.95, P = 0.036) were associated with a reduced risk for thromboembolic outcomes, and the 1236C-2677G-3435C (HR 2.55, 95% CI, 1.03-6.36, P = 0.044) and 1236T-2677G-3435C (HR 5.88, 95% CI, 2.35-14.72, P < 0.001) haplotypes with an increased risk for thromboembolic outcomes in rivaroxaban users. The ABCB1 c.2482-2236G>A (rs4148738) SNV associated with a lower risk for bleeding events (HR 0.37, 95% CI, 0.16-0.89, P = 0.025) in apixaban users. ABCB1 variants are potential factors affecting thromboembolic events in rivaroxaban users and bleeding events in apixaban users. Studies with larger numbers of patients are warranted for comprehensive assessment of the pharmacogenetic associations of DOACs and their relevance for clinical practice.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Female; Genotype; Haplotypes; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pharmacogenetics; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban is an oral anticoagulant widely used for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). During long-term anticoagulant therapy, delayed or missed doses are common. This study aimed to explore appropriate remedial dosing regimens for non-adherent rivaroxaban-treated patients.. Monte Carlo simulation based on a previously established rivaroxaban population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for patients with NVAF was employed to design remedial dosing regimens. The proposed regimens were compared with remedial strategies in the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) guide by assessing deviation time in terms of drug concentration, factor Xa activity, and prothrombin time.. The proposed remedial dosing regimens were dependent on delay duration. The missed dose should be taken immediately when the delay does not exceed 6 h; a half dose is advisable when the delay is between 6 and 20 h. A missed dose should be skipped if less than 4 h remains before the next dose. The proposed regimens resulted in shorter deviation time than that of the EHRA guide.. PK/PD modeling and simulation provide valid evidence on the remedial dosing regimen of rivaroxaban, which could help to minimize the risk of bleeding and thromboembolism.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Computer Simulation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Monte Carlo Method; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Time Factors

Background Rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran are non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) that are widely used for treatment or prevention of venous thromboembolism and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Objective To estimate and compare hemorrhagic events report of rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran. Setting FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to assess the signal of hemorrhagic events of different NOACs. Main outcome measure The overall hemorrhagic events and hemorrhagic events in different physiological systems. Results From January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2019, the total number of reports of hemorrhage related to rivaroxaban was 53,085, and the numbers of apixaban and dabigatran were 13,151 and 14,100 respectively. The overall ROR (95% CI) of hemorrhagic events reporting for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran and apixaban versus dabigatran were 1.58 (1.54-1.62) and 0.47 (0.46-0.48) respectively. The ROR (95% CI) for rivaroxaban versus dabigatran in gastrointestinal system, nervous system, renal and urinary system, skin and subcutaneous tissue, and eye system was 1.38 (1.34-1.42), 0.94 (0.90-0.98), 1.07 (1.01-1.13), 0.80 (0.70-0.90), and 1.38 (1.19-1.60) respectively. The RORs (95% CI) for apixaban versus dabigatran in gastrointestinal system, nervous system, renal and urinary system, skin and subcutaneous tissue, and eye system were 0.28 (0.27-0.29), 0.69 (0.66-0.73), 0.31 (0.29-0.34), 0.98 (0.86-1.12), and 1.18 (1.00-1.39), respectively. Conclusions Overall, we found a moderate signal of higher frequency of reporting hemorrhage in rivaroxban compared with dabigatran and decreased hemorrhagic event reporting in apixaban compared with dabigatran. While this potential signal has not been confirmed in clinical trials or observational studies, in clinical practice, attention should be paid to the risk of potential hemorrhage when the patients switch from apixaban to dabigatran or rivaroxban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may increase the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and GI cancer compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA).. We conducted a Danish nationwide cohort study comparing the bleeding risk associated with DOAC versus VKA in patients with AF and GI cancer. We calculated crude bleeding rates per 100 person-years (PYs) for GI and major bleeding. We then compared rates of bleeding at 1 year after initial oral anticoagulation filled prescription by treatment regimen using inverse probability of treatment weighting and Cox regression.. The unweighted study population included 1476 AF patients with GI cancer (41.6% women, median age 78 years) initiating a DOAC and 652 initiating a VKA. One-year risk of GI bleeding was 5.0% in the DOAC group and 4.7% in the VKA group with a corresponding weighted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63, 1.45). For patients with active cancer, weighted GI bleeding rates were slightly higher in both the VKA and DOAC group, and the weighted HR was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.53, 1.88). The HR was 1.12 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.76) for all bleedings. Hazard ratios for GI bleeding were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.25, 1.52) for patients with upper GI cancer, and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.46) in patients with colorectal cancer.. Evidence from this nationwide cohort study suggests a comparable 1-year risk of bleeding associated with DOAC compared with VKA among patients with AF and GI cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Confidence Intervals; Dabigatran; Denmark; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Low dose direct acting oral anticoagulants (LDDOACS) were approved for elderly atrial Fibrillation (AF) patients with limited information. A retrospective analysis collecting baseline characteristics and outcomes in AF patients ≥ 80 prescribed LDDOAC or warfarin (W), from a multidisciplinary practice between 1/1/11 (First LDDOAC available) and 5/31/17 was conducted. From 9660 AF patients, 514 ≥ 80 received a LDDOAC and 422 W. A multivariable comparison found LDDOAC patients were older (p <0.001), had lower creatinine clearance (CrCl) (p = 0.006), used more anti-platelet drugs (p <0.001), and more often had new onset AF verses those prescribed W (p <0.001). There were no clinically significant differences among those patients receiving Dabigatran 75 mgs BID (D), Rivaroxaban 15mgs (R) or Apixaban 2.5mgs BID (A). Forty-eight and 50% of the patients remained on their LDDOAC or W for the observation period (p = 0.55). Stroke/systemic embolism (SSE) and CNS bleeds were 1.16 vs 2.22%/yr., (p = 0.143) and 1.46 vs 0.93%/yr., (p = 0.24). Mortality and major bleeds were 6.26 vs 1.67%/yr., and 12.3vs 3.77%/yr. (p <0.001). SSE were 1.1%/yr for D, R, and A (p = 0.94). CNS bleeds were 2.2 for D, 1.7 for R and 0.8%/yr. for A: p = 0.53. Major bleeding was: 14.3 for D, 14.1 for R and 9.1%/yr. for A, p = 0.048 (with A < R, p = 0.01). Mortality was 5.5 for D, 4.2 for R and 9.5% for A, p = 0.031. In conclusion, half the patients remained on their assigned anti-coagulant. SSE and intracranial bleed rates were similar and low. Major bleeds and deaths were different between groups emphasizing the need for prospective randomized trials in this growing population with AF.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on long-term direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be at higher risk of bleeding because of higher anti-Xa or anti-IIa levels. However, there is no postmarketing study investigating these DOAC plasma levels at the time of bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate DOAC levels at the time of a bleeding emergency. We analyzed 5440 patients examined at our Emergency Department in from April 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019. During this period, we prospective identified 105 consecutive patients with bleeding while on long-term antithrombotic therapy; 49 patients had AF on DOACs. We compared DOAC levels in patients who bled against a control sample of 55 patients who tolerated long-term high dose DOAC therapy without any emergency. Samples of these patients were tested with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis (rivaroxaban and apixaban) and with Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor assay (dabigatran). Dabigatran-treated patients who bled had significantly higher anti-IIa levels when compared with trough (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 85.4 ± 57.2 ng/mL, P < 0.001) and peak samples of controls (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 138.8 ± 78.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Similarly, there were significantly higher anti-Xa levels in rivaroxaban-treated and apixaban-treated patients with bleeding compared with trough control samples (rivaroxaban: 245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 52.5 ± 36.4 ng/mL, P <0.001 and apixaban: 311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 119.9 ± 81.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001), as well as in apixaban-treated patients when compared with peak control samples (311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 210.9 ± 88.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Finally, rivaroxaban anti-Xa levels in patients who bled tended to be higher compared with peak control samples (245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 177.6 ± 38.6 ng/mL, P = 0.13). This observational study showed a significant difference in anti-IIa and anti-Xa plasma levels in patients with AF with bleeding complications compared with those who tolerated long-term high-dose DOAC therapy without bleeding complications.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Case-Control Studies; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) management increasingly involves anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Few studies have used competing-risks analyses to ascertain the mortality-adjusted hemorrhage and recurrent VTE (rVTE) risk of individual DOACs. Furthermore, hemorrhage risk factors in patients treated with apixaban remain underexplored.. Patients diagnosed with VTE receiving anticoagulation were identified from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart (2003-2019). Study endpoints included readmissions for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), non-intracranial hemorrhage (non-ICH hemorrhage), and rVTE. Coarsened exact matching was used to balance baseline clinical characteristics. Complication incidence was evaluated using a competing-risks framework. We additionally modeled hemorrhage risk in apixaban-treated patients.. Overall, 225,559 patients were included, of whom 34,201 received apixaban and 46,007 received rivaroxaban. Compared to rivaroxaban, apixaban was associated with decreased non-ICH hemorrhage (sHR = 0.560, 95%CI = 0.423-0.741), but not ICH, and rVTE (sHR = 0.802, 95%CI = 0.651-0.988) risk. This was primarily in emergent readmissions (sHR[emergent hemorrhage] = 0.515, 95%CI = 0.372-0.711; sHR[emergent rVTE] = 0.636, 95%CI = 0.488-0.830). Contributors to emergent hemorrhage in apixaban-treated patients include older age (sHR = 1.025, 95%CI = 1.011-1.039), female sex (sHR = 1.662, 95%CI = 1.252-2.207), prior prescription antiplatelet therapy (sHR = 1.591, 95%CI = 1.130-2.241), and complicated hypertension (sHR = 1.936, 95%CI = 1.134-3.307). Patients anticipated to be "high-risk" experienced elevated ICH (sHR = 3.396, 95%CI = 1.375-8.388) and non-ICH hemorrhage (sHR = 3.683, 95%CI = 2.957-4.588) incidence.. In patients with VTE receiving anticoagulation, apixaban was associated with reduced non-ICH hemorrhage and rVTE risk, compared to rivaroxaban. Risk reduction was restricted to emergent readmissions. We present a risk-stratification approach to predict hemorrhage in patients receiving apixaban, potentially guiding future clinical decision-making.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Thrombosis is the most common adverse event in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). Little is known about the use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOAC in a cohort of patients with PV and ET, who experienced venous thromboembolism (VTE). We enrolled 48 consecutive patients with PV (70.8%) and ET [median age 67.0 (interquartile range, 58.5-72.0) years], who experienced VTE. Patients received apixaban (39.6%), rivaroxaban (33.3%), or dabigatran (27.1%). During a median follow-up of 30 (interquartile range, 20.5-41.5) months, recurrent thrombotic events and bleeding were recorded. Four thrombotic events (3.3 per 100 patient-years) were reported. Three deep vein thrombosis episodes (2.5 per 100 patient-years) were experienced by 2 patients with PV, who received apixaban (5 mg bid) and dabigatran (150 mg bid), and 1 patient with ET, who received dabigatran (150 mg bid). One ischemic stroke occurred in a patient with PV on rivaroxaban (20 mg/d). There was 1 major bleeding (0.8 per 100 patient-years) in a patient with ET on dabigatran (150 mg bid) and 3 clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (2.5 per 100 patient-years): 2 on rivaroxaban (20 mg/d) and 1 on apixaban (5 mg bid). We did not observe significant differences related to the type of NOAC. Three deaths (2.5 per 100 patient-years) unrelated to either VTE or bleeding were recorded. This study shows that NOACs may be effective and safe as secondary prevention of VTE in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polycythemia Vera; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thrombocythemia, Essential; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Life-threatening bleeding requires prompt reversal of the anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors. This study investigated the effectiveness of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in treating trauma-related hemorrhage with rivaroxaban-anticoagulation in a pig polytrauma model. This study also tested the hypothesis that the combined use of a low dose of prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate could improve its subtherapeutic effects.. Trauma (blunt liver injury and bilateral femur fractures) was induced in 48 anesthetized male pigs after 30 min of rivaroxaban infusion (1 mg/kg). Animals in the first part of the study received prothrombin complex concentrate (12.5, 25, and 50 U/kg). In the second part, animals were treated with 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid or plus tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate. The primary endpoint was total blood loss postinjury. The secondary endpoints (panel of coagulation parameters and thrombin generation) were monitored for 240 min posttrauma or until death.. The first part of the study showed that blood loss was significantly lower in the 25 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate (1,541 ± 269 ml) and 50 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate (1,464 ± 108 ml) compared with control (3,313 ± 634 ml), and 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate (2,671 ± 334 ml, all P < 0.0001). In the second part of the study, blood loss was significantly less in the 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate (1,836 ± 556 ml, P < 0.001) compared with 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid (2,910 ± 856 ml), and there were no early deaths in the 25 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate, 50 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate, and 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate groups. Histopathologic analyses postmortem showed no adverse events.. Prothrombin complex concentrate effectively reduced blood loss, restored hemostasis, and balanced thrombin generation. A multimodal hemostatic approach using tranexamic acid plus fibrinogen concentrate enhanced the effect of low doses of prothrombin complex concentrate, potentially reducing the prothrombin complex concentrate doses required for effective bleeding control.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Combined Modality Therapy; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Male; Multiple Trauma; Rivaroxaban; Swine

Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Neutralizing; Antibodies, Viral; Anticoagulants; Autoexperimentation; BNT162 Vaccine; Chills; Contraindications, Procedure; COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Fatigue; Hemorrhage; Hemorrhagic Disorders; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Punctures; Rivaroxaban; SARS-CoV-2

Since direct oral anticoagulants have been marketed, the management of major bleeding in emergency departments has become more challenging. In 2013 and 2016, the Working Group in Perioperative Haemostasis made several proposals for this. The objective of the present study was to evaluate conformity with these proposals in daily clinical practice. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study addressing the management of major bleeding in patients treated by direct oral anticoagulant in an emergency department. Patients were included between January 1, 2015 and November 30, 2017. Among 3,365 patients admitted to the emergency department for bleeding, a total of 191 were treated by direct oral anticoagulant and 55 (28.8%) with major bleeding were included in the present study. The majority of patients received rivaroxaban (n = 44, 80.0%) and were treated for atrial fibrillation (n = 47, 85.0%). Bleeding concerned gastrointestinal (n = 30, 54.6%) and (n = 14, 25.5%) intracranial location. Twenty-one patients (38.2%) were treated by prothrombin complex concentrate, and 31 patients (56.4%) were transfused. Intervention for hemostatic control was performed for 30 patients (54.6%). Thirty-three patients (60.0%) presented a deviation from protocol. There is no significant difference for mortality at 3 months according to whether or not there was a deviation from protocol. Nearly two-thirds of patients with major bleeding associated with direct oral anticoagulant administration had protocol deviation, but there was no effect on mortality.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Emergency Service, Hospital; Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

To compare the bleeding risk in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer with that in patients with non-GI cancer treated with anticoagulation for acute cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (Ca-VTE).. Consecutive patients with Ca-VTE seen at the Mayo Thrombophilia Clinic between March 1, 2013, and April 20, 2020, were observed prospectively to assess major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB).. In the group of 1392 patients with Ca-VTE, 499 (35.8%) had GI cancer including 272 with luminal GI cancer (lower GI, 208; upper GI, 64), 176 with pancreatic cancer, and 51 with hepatobiliary cancer. The rate of major bleeding and CRNMB in patients with GI cancer was similar to that in 893 (64.2%) patients with non-GI cancer treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, or enoxaparin. Apixaban had a higher rate of major bleeding in luminal GI cancer compared with the non-GI cancer group (15.59 vs 3.26 per 100 person-years; P=.004) and compared with enoxaparin in patients with luminal GI cancer (15.59 vs 3.17; P=.04). Apixaban had a lower rate of CRNMB compared with rivaroxaban in patients with GI cancer (3.83 vs 9.40 per 100 person-years; P=.03). Patients treated with rivaroxaban in the luminal GI cancer group had a major bleeding rate similar to that of patients with non-GI cancer (2.04 vs 4.91 per 100 person-years; P=.37).. Apixaban has a higher rate of major bleeding in patients with luminal GI cancer compared with patients with non-GI cancer and compared with enoxaparin in patients with luminal GI cancer. Rivaroxaban shows no increased risk of major bleeding in patients with GI cancer or luminal GI cancer compared with patients with non-GI cancer.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03504007.

Topics: Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Hemorrhage; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; United States; Venous Thrombosis

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) present a favorable alternative to warfarin based on the decreased burden of monitoring and fewer drug and food interactions. Although studied in the general population, limited clinical data justifying efficacy in patients weighing ≥120 kg present concern for using DOACs in this specific population.. The purpose was to identify if a difference exists in incidence of recurrent thromboembolic events in patients receiving a DOAC for the indication of venous thromboembolism (VTE) weighing ≥120 kg compared to patients weighing <120 kg.. A retrospective database analysis was conducted with patients on apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban for treatment of VTE from the Veterans Integrated Service Network 8 between January 2012 and June 2017. The primary outcome was incidence of recurrent VTEs while on anticoagulation. Fisher's exact tests were used to evaluate difference in VTEs between the groups.. There were 133 patients weighing ≥120 kg and 1063 patients weighing <120 kg identified within the 5-year time frame that met inclusion criteria. Although no statistically significant difference was found in incidence of recurrent VTEs between study groups (0.8% vs 1.1%; odds ratio: 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.09-5.14;. This study found no difference in VTE recurrence in patients weighing ≥120 kg compared to patients <120 kg with few events in either group. Although promising, additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as rivaroxaban, reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, it is still unclear whether the stroke reduction benefit outweighs the bleeding risk in elderly Japanese patients with NVAF. The Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety and Effectiveness Study in Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (XAPASS) was a real-world, prospective observational, post-marketing surveillance study on the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in Japanese clinical practice. This sub-analysis evaluated the clinical outcomes of elderly patients aged ≥ 75 years. At the 1-year follow-up, there were 4,685 (48.91%) and 4,893 (51.09%) patients aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years, respectively. Safety and effectiveness outcomes were compared between patients aged ≥ 75 years and those aged < 75 years, and among 3 elderly sub-populations (age ranges: 75-79, 80-84, and ≥ 85 years). Patients aged ≥ 75 years had higher rates of major bleeding [2.22 vs. 1.35 events per 100 patient-years, hazard ratio (HR) 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.28] and composite of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic)/non-central nervous system (non-CNS) systemic embolism (SE)/myocardial infarction (MI) (2.41 vs. 1.21 events per 100 patient-years, HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.40-2.77) compared to patients aged < 75 years. Intracranial hemorrhage rates were < 1 event per 100 patient-years in both groups (0.85 vs. 0.59 events per 100 patient-years, HR 1.43, 95% CI 0.85-2.40). Kaplan-Meier curves of major bleeding and stroke/non-CNS SE/MI showed that no significant differences of cumulative event rates were identified among the 3 elderly sub-populations. Stepwise Cox regression analyses revealed that creatinine clearance (CrCl) (<50 mL/min), hepatic impairment, and hypertension were specific predictors for major bleeding and no specific predictors were found for stroke/non-CNS SE/MI in patients aged ≥ 75 years. In conclusion, safety and effectiveness event rates were higher in patients aged ≥ 75 years compared with those aged < 75 years, yet, no distinct differences were observed among the 3 elderly sub-populations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

There are scarce data evaluating the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD) treated in routine practice.. Using MarketScan data from January 2012 to December 2017, we identified oral anticoagulant (OAC)-naïve NVAF patients receiving rivaroxaban (15-20 mg once daily) or warfarin, with comorbid CAD and/or PAD and ≥12 months of insurance coverage before OAC initiation. Differences in baseline covariates between cohorts were adjusted using inverse probability-of-treatment weights based on propensity scores (standardized differences <0.1 achieved for all covariates after adjustment). Endpoints included a composite of major thrombotic vascular events (MTVEs) (including ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or need for lower limb revascularization/major amputation) and major bleeding. Patients were followed until an event-of-interest, discontinuation/switch of index OAC, insurance disenrolment, or end-of-data availability. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox regression. We identified 3257 rivaroxaban (30.4% received a 15 mg dose) and 5046 warfarin users with NVAF and comorbid CAD and/or PAD. Rivaroxaban was associated with a 32% (95% CI = 8-50%) reduction in the composite of MTVE. No significant difference in major bleeding was observed (HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.84-1.52). No statistical interactions were noted in subgroup analyses performed on the MTVE (P-interaction ≥ 0.35 for all) or major bleeding endpoints (P-interaction ≥ 0.09 for all).. Among patients with NVAF and comorbid CAD and/or PAD, rivaroxaban use was associated with a reduced risk of MTVEs vs. warfarin, without significantly increasing major bleeding risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Coronary Artery Disease; Databases, Factual; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Formularies, Hospital as Topic; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban

The goal of this study was to assess the differences between an ex ante and an ex post cost-effectiveness analysis of Dabigatran etexilate vs VKAs for the prevention of thromboembolic events in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients and to draw lessons on the design and use of real-world data for decision making.. The same model was used to calculate the cost-effectiveness ratio using two sets of parameters. One set included the efficacy and safety outcomes data from RE-LY, the pivotal trial comparing Dabigatran to warfarin; cost data came from an ex ante publication. Outcomes data for the second set came from real-world data studies. Cost data were a mix of real-world data and other sources. Two treatment strategies were compared: treatment initiation by either Dabigatran or VKAs, followed by either VKAs or Dabigatran. A crude comparison of results was performed; the impact of data differences was then assessed. Probabilistic sensitivity results of the two analyses were compared.. With real-world evidence, Dabigatran at both dosages was more effective for the prevention of ischemic strokes, intra-cranial haemorrhages, with less major extra-cranial haemorrhages and a similar risk of myocardial infarction. Using clinical trial data, Dabigatran150 mg (resp. Dabigatran110 mg) as a first-line treatment vs VKAs yielded an ICER of € 8077/QALY (resp. € 13,116/QALY). Real-world evidence scenarios were cost-saving and more effective for both dosages.. The reassessment of outcomes and cost data had an impact on results, improving the efficiency of Dabigatran. We identify methodological issues which should be discussed if post-launch RWE based cost-effectiveness data become a standard in HTA decision making.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dabigatran; France; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Coagulation Factors; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

Empirically, a significant proportion of patients using direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) take off-label reduced doses. We aimed to investigate the prevalence, indications, dosages, and bleeding complications of oral anticoagulants on admission to the emergency department.. In this retrospective analysis, patients presenting to our emergency department between January 1 and December 31, 2018, with therapeutic oral anticoagulation were included (ie, vitamin-K antagonists, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran). A detailed chart review was performed for each case concerning characteristics, indication, and bleeding complications.. A total of 19,662 consecutive cases in the emergency department were reported: 1721 (9%) had therapeutic oral anticoagulation. Vitamin-K antagonists (41%), rivaroxaban (36%), and apixaban (19%) were the most common. Stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (63.2%) and venous thromboembolism (24.1%) were the most common indications. In 27 cases (1.6%), no indication could be identified; further, 32% of patients were classified to have either off-label doses of DOACs or an international normalized ratio (INR) out of range (in vitamin-K antagonists), whereas 20% were classified as off-label underdosed and 12% as overdosed. No difference in the likelihood of bleeding on admission could be found between the respective drugs. Only concomitant use of aspirin was significantly associated with presence and higher severity of bleeding.. Vitamin-K antagonists are still the most widely used drug followed by rivaroxaban. A significant proportion of patients are being prescribed off label-doses. While no difference was found for the respective anticoagulants with respect to bleeding, concomitant aspirin use was a significant predictor for bleeding in our collective.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Off-Label Use; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Vitamin K

Despite controversies, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We investigated the safety and efficacy of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in real-life consecutive APS patients.. In a cohort study of 176 APS patients, which included 82 subjects who preferred DOACs or had unstable anticoagulation with VKAs, we recorded venous thromboembolism (VTE), cerebrovascular ischemic events or myocardial infarction, along with major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB).. APS patients were followed for a median time of 51 (interquartile range 43-63) months. Patients on DOACs and those on VKAs were similar with regard to baseline characteristics. APS patients treated with DOACs had increased risk of recurrent thromboembolic events and recurrent VTE alone compared with those on VKAs (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.54-10.28,. During long-term follow-up of real-life APS patients, DOACs are less effective and less safe as VKAs in the prevention of thromboembolism.

Topics: Adult; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Two randomized, controlled studies comparing outcomes in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants or low-molecular weight heparin for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) have previously been performed. However, gynecologic cancers accounted for approximately 10% of the study populations. We compared the outcomes of patients with primary gynecological cancers who were treated for cancer-associated VTE with either rivaroxaban or dalteparin.. The 162 eligible patients with gynecologic cancers who were treated with either dalteparin (n=60) or rivaroxaban (n=102) were reviewed. The primary outcome was a composite event, which included recurrence or clinically relevant bleeding events during the therapeutic period. Secondary outcomes were recurrence, clinically relevant bleeding events, and mortality.. During the therapeutic period, there were no significant differences between the groups in the proportion of composite events, recurrence, or clinically relevant bleeding. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model also showed no significant difference in the number of composite events and clinically relevant bleeding between the groups. In the rivaroxaban group, 44.0% of patients experienced gastrointestinal bleeding and 24.0% experienced urinary tract bleeding. In the dalteparin group, bleeding was most common in the urinary tract (44.4%) and at the injection site (22.2%).. In this study, although there were no significant differences in effectiveness or safety between the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, rivaroxaban use was associated with a higher rate of clinically relevant bleeding than dalteparin. Therefore, caution should be taken when prescribing rivaroxaban for gynecologic cancer-associated VTE and bleeding events should be carefully monitored.

Topics: Aged; Dalteparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Republic of Korea; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

A significant number of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are ineligible for non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) due to previous major bleeding or because they are at high bleeding risk (HBR). In this setting the indication for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) is a valuable alternative. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus LAAO indication in NVAF patients at HBR (HAS-BLED ≥3).. All consecutive patients who underwent successful LAAO (n=193) and those treated with NOACs (n=189) (dabigatran, apixaban or rivaroxaban) were included. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match LAAO and NOACs patients. At baseline, patients in the LAAO group had higher HAS-BLED (4.2% vs 3.3%, p<0.001) and lower CHADS-VASc (4.3% vs 4.7%, p=0.005) scores. After 1:1 PSM, 192 patients were enrolled in the final analysis (LAAO n=96; NOACs n=96). At two-year follow-up, no significant differences in thromboembolic (7.3% vs 6.3%, p=0.966) and ISTH major bleeding event rates (6.7% vs 4.8% p=0.503) were found between the two unmatched groups. All-cause death was significantly higher in the LAAO group (18.7% vs 10.6%; p=0.049). After PSM, all-cause death, thromboembolic and ISTH major bleeding event rates were similar between the groups. Significant independent predictors of all-cause death were dialysis (HR 5.65, 95% CI: 2.16-14.85, p<0.001) and age (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.13, p<0.001).. In NVAF patients at HBR, LAAO and NOACs performed similarly in terms of thromboembolic and major bleeding events up to two-year follow-up. Our findings warrant further investigation in randomised trials and therefore can be considered as hypothesis-generating.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Appendage; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Catheterization; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

The study objective was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran and other direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation using a prospective monitoring program. We implemented a cohort design with propensity score matching to compare initiators of DOACs and warfarin between 2010 and 2015 in two US healthcare databases. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for stroke and major bleeding. The final analyses included 29,448 dabigatran, 35,520 rivaroxaban, and 19,588 apixaban initiators, matched to warfarin initiators. The pooled HR for stroke was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.98) for dabigatran, 0.77 (95% CI 0.61-0.98) for rivaroxaban, and 0.69 (95% CI 0.50-0.96) for apixaban, consistent with findings from randomized trials. For major hemorrhage, the HRs were 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.80), 1.02 (95% CI 0.94-1.12), and 0.56 (95% CI 0.49-0.64), respectively, showing a decreased risk of major bleeding for both dabigatran and apixaban, as compared with trial evidence.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin; Young Adult

In 2018, the FDA approved andexanet alfa for the reversal of life-threatening hemorrhages in patients anticoagulated with apixaban or rivaroxaban. Yet, cost-effective factor Xa inhibitor reversal remains controversial. The objective of this study was to describe real world utilization of andexanet alfa.. This was a retrospective case series of patients receiving andexanet alfa between July 28, 2018 and April 29, 2019 at a large academic health system. Baseline demographics, anticoagulant type and reversal, as well as brain imaging were collected. Primary endpoints were stability of hematoma for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and hemostatic effectiveness for patients undergoing surgical procedures. Secondary endpoints were thromboembolism and 30 day mortality.. Of the 25 patients evaluated, 13 received andexanet alfa for ICH. Eleven of the 13 had follow-up imaging available and stability was observed in 90.9%. Three patients received andexanet alfa for reversal prior to surgical procedures, and 100% hemostatic effectiveness was achieved. Nine patients received andexanet alfa for reversal of extracranial bleeding, including gastrointestinal bleed (n=4). There were no thrombotic events in our cohort, and 30 day mortality was 24%. Sixty-four percent of patients would have met exclusion criteria for the ANNEXA-4 trial.. This is the largest series to date describing real-world utilization of andexanet alfa. Our series showed hemostatic efficacy in 90.9% of patients with ICH, and 100% in patients undergoing surgical procedures. There were no thrombotic complications. Yet, larger and comparative studies are needed to clarify the optimal agent and patient selection for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Treatment Outcome

The use of direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation continues to rise. Certain populations may be at higher risk for increased drug exposure and adverse events. Pharmacokinetic studies suggest increased exposure of rivaroxaban and apixaban with combined P-gp and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors but the clinical relevance of this is unknown. This retrospective cohort study included patients receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016 with a moderate inhibitor (amiodarone, dronedarone, diltiazem, verapamil) for at least 3 months in the drug-drug interaction (DDI) group. Propensity matching was used to identify similar control patients without the presence of the DDI. The primary outcome was a time to event analysis of any bleeding episode as defined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis. After propensity matching, 213 patients with similar baseline characteristics were included in each group. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.0 and median duration of follow-up was 1.45 years. The primary outcome occurred in 26.4% of patients in the DDI group and 18.4% in the control group (hazard ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19 to 2.73; p-value = 0.006). There was no difference in bleeding rates based on type of inhibitor. Use of a combined P-gp and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor with rivaroxaban or apixaban increased bleeding risk compared to patients without the DDI in this real world, retrospective study. Analysis in a larger patient population is needed to confirm these findings.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

The aim of this study was to compare the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in routine clinical practice.. Using nationwide registries in Norway from January 2013 to December 2017, we established a cohort of 52 476 new users of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with AF. Users of individual NOACs were matched 1:1 on the propensity score to create three pairwise-matched cohorts: dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban (20 504 patients), dabigatran vs. apixaban (20 826 patients), and rivaroxaban vs. apixaban (27 398 patients). Hazard ratios (HRs) for the risk of stroke or SE and major bleeding were estimated. In the propensity-matched comparisons of the risk of stroke or SE, the HRs were 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.02] for dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban, 0.88 (95% CI 0.75-1.02) for dabigatran vs. apixaban, and 1.00 (95% CI 0.89-1.14) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban. For the risk of major bleeding, the HRs were 0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.88) for dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban, 1.03 (95% CI 0.85-1.24) for dabigatran vs. apixaban, and 0.79 (95% CI 0.68-0.91) for apixaban vs. rivaroxaban.. In this nationwide study of patients with AF in Norway, we found no statistically significant differences in risk of stroke or SE in propensity-matched comparisons between dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. However, dabigatran and apixaban were both associated with significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Norway; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The present study aimed at describing (i) the characteristics of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients newly treated with oral anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists [VKA] or new oral anticoagulants [NOAC]), and (ii) their persistence to treatment assigned, clinical outcomes (bleeding and thromboembolic events) and mortality.. This study was conducted using administrative databases of an Italian Local Health Unit. All adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with NVAF and naïve to VKA (warfarin) or NOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran) were included between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015. Propensity score matching was performed to check for confounding effects. Included patients were characterized for comorbidities, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED score, antiplatelet drug use and followed up for at least 12 months to assess persistence to treatment and incidence of clinical outcomes.. A total of 970 NVAF patients newly treated with oral anticoagulants were included; 595 (61.3%) received VKA and 375 (38.7%) NOAC. VKA naïve patients had a lower low and intermediate score for HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc compared to NOAC patients. Overall, 80.6% of naïve NAO patients and 73.4% of naïve AVK patients were persistent to treatment. Incidence of bleeding events was slightly higher in VKA patients (3.13/100 persons year) compared to NOAC patients (2.73/100 persons years), as well as incidence of thromboembolic events (3.48/100 persons year and 2.18/100 persons year, respectively). After propensity score matching no differences were observed.. The majority of NVAF patients newly treated with oral anticoagulants received VKA-based therapy. Incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic events was slightly higher in VKA patients compared to NOAC patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

It is important to understand the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving direct oral anticoagulants; however, data on risk factors in Japanese patients are limited.. XAPASS (Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety and Effectiveness Study in Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) is a prospective observational study examining the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in Japanese real-world clinical practice. We investigated risk factors for stroke/noncentral nervous system systemic embolism (non-CNS SE)/myocardial infarction (MI) and major bleeding using 1-year follow-up data. Associations between baseline characteristics and outcomes were examined by Cox regression analysis.. During April 2012-June 2014, 11,308 patients newly started with rivaroxaban treatment were enrolled. Of 9578 patients with 1-year data fixed as of September 2017, 6220 patients who received appropriate dosages of rivaroxaban for their creatinine clearance were included in the present safety outcomes subanalysis, and 6198 were included in the effectiveness outcomes analysis. Stroke/non-CNS SE/MI was observed in 97 of 6198 patients (1.6%, 1.8 events/100 patient-years), and major bleeding occurred in 102 of 6220 patients (1.6%, 1.9 events/100 patient-years). Age greater than or equal to 75 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.27; [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49, 3.47]), prior ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (2.08; [1.38, 3.13]), and antiplatelet use (3.23; [1.83, 5.70]) were associated with stroke/non-CNS SE/MI. Creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min (HR: 1.86; [95% CI: 1.26, 2.75]), diabetes (1.55; [1.02, 2.35]), and antiplatelet use (3.04; [1.70, 5.45]) were associated with major bleeding.. These results would help physicians to assess risks in Japanese patients with NVAF receiving rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Decision-Making; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We evaluated adherence to dosing criteria for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking dabigatran or rivaroxaban and the impact of off-label dosing on thromboembolic and bleeding risk.. We used data for a retrospective cohort from a large U.S. health plan for Medicare beneficiaries age > =65 years with AF who initiated dabigatran or rivaroxaban during 2010-2016. Stroke and major bleeding were quantified in patients who were eligible for low dose but received standard dose, and in patients who were eligible for standard dose but received low dose.. We identified 8035 and 19,712 patients who initiated dabigatran or rivaroxaban, respectively. Overall, 1401 (17.4%) and 7820 (39.7%) patients who received dabigatran and rivaroxaban met criteria for low dose, respectively. Of those, 959 (68.5%) and 3904 (49.9%) received standard dose. In contrast, 1013 (15.3%) and 2551 (21.5%) of patients eligible for standard dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban received low dose. Mean follow-up for patients eligible for low and standard dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban were 13.9, 15.1, 10.1, and 12.3 months, respectively. In unadjusted analyses, patients eligible for low or standard dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban but receiving off-label dose, had no differences in the rates of ischemic stroke. Among patients who met criteria for standard dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), use of low dose was associated with significantly higher risk of any major bleeding (Dabigatran: HR = 1.44; 95% CI 1.14-1.8, P = 0.002, Rivaroxaban HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.11-1.6, P = 0.002) and gastrointestinal bleeding (Dabigatran: HR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.08-2, P = 0.016). In patients who met criteria for low dose DOACs, there was lower risk of major bleeding (Dabigatran: HR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.43-0.8, P < 0.001), gastrointestinal (Rivaroxaban: HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.98, P = 0.03) and intracranial bleeding (Dabigatran: HR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.12-0.9, P = 0.001) with standard dosing. After propensity matching, use of off-label doses was not associated with stroke, major, gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding for either dabigatran or rivaroxaban.. While a significant number of patients receive higher or lower dose of dabigatran and rivaroxaban than recommended, we found no evidence of significant impact on thromboembolic or hemorrhagic outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medicare; Off-Label Use; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

To assess the association between concurrent use of potential pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interacting drugs and major bleeding among direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users.. We performed a case-control study nested in a cohort of new users of DOACs (dabigatran etexilate, apixaban or rivaroxaban). Data were obtained from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (2008-2015). Cases were patients hospitalized having a primary diagnosis of major bleeding. Up to 4 controls were matched on age, sex, index date and region. Odds ratios (ORs) for the risk of major bleeding were assessed by conditional logistic regression analysis and adjusted for well-known covariates for the risk of bleeding.. We identified 393 patients with a major bleeding from a total of 23 492 new users of DOACs and 1494 matched controls. Most subjects were users of rivaroxaban (58.8%) on the index date. The concurrent use of pharmacodynamic interacting drugs was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (21.6% of cases vs 13.5% of controls, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.66). For the antiplatelet drugs the aOR was 2.01 (95% CI, 1.29-3.11) and for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors the aOR was 1.68 (95% CI, 1.10-2.59). We found no increased risk of major bleeding for concurrent use of pharmacokinetic interacting drugs vs DOACs alone (45.0 vs 51.2%; aOR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.53-1.10).. Among patients taking DOACs the concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors was associated with increased risk of major bleeding, while pharmacokinetic interacting drugs do not increase this risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Case-Control Studies; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

Venous thromboembolism is a common complication among cancer patients with an estimated risk of 20%. American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants for long-term anticoagulation but caution the use of direct oral anticoagulants because of drug-drug interactions with antineoplastic therapies. The clinical impact of these drug-drug interactions is yet to be studied in clinical trials. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the drug-drug interactions on venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding.. This is a retrospective cohort study that included cancer patients with venous thromboembolism receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban with antineoplastic therapy. The impact of the drug-drug interaction was determined by its effect on the rates of venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding in patients with a drug-drug interaction compared to patients with no drug-drug interaction.. The primary composite endpoint of venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding events occurred in 65% versus 62% of patients in drug-drug interaction and non-drug-drug interaction groups accordingly. There was a higher rate of venous thromboembolism recurrence and minor bleeding events with anti-mitotic microtubule inhibitors and a higher rate of minor bleeding events with hormonal therapy and alkylating agents. Among the drug-drug interaction group, there were no major bleeding events reported with mild drug-drug interactions when compared to moderate-to-severe drug-drug interactions. There was no difference in time to venous thromboembolism recurrence between rivaroxaban and apixaban.. Due to small sample size, our study results could not confirm a higher risk of bleeding or venous thromboembolism recurrence with the drug-drug interactions. Further prospective study is warranted, but clinicians should be aware of these drug-drug interactions and identify them using available literature.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Drug Interactions; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aortic Valve; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Early Termination of Clinical Trials; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome

Background Reducing major bleeding events is a challenge when managing anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. This study evaluated the impact of modifiable and nonmodifiable bleeding risk factors in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving rivaroxaban and estimated the impact of risk factor modification on major bleeding events. Methods and Results Modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors associated with major bleeding events were identified from the XANTUS (Xarelto for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) prospective registry data set (6784 rivaroxaban-treated patients). Parameters showing univariate association with bleeding were used to construct a multivariable model identifying independent risk factors. Modeling was used to estimate attributed weights to risk factors. Heavy alcohol use (hazard ratio [HR]=2.37; 95% CI 1.24-4.53); uncontrolled hypertension (HR after parameter-wise shrinkage=1.79; 95% CI 1.05-3.05); and concomitant treatment with antiplatelets, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or paracetamol (HR=1.80; 95% CI 1.24-2.61) were identified as modifiable, independent bleeding risk factors. Increasing age (HR=1.25 [per 5-year increment]; 95% CI 1.12-1.38); heart failure (HR=1.97; 95% CI 1.36-2.86); and vascular disease (HR=1.91; 95% CI 1.32-2.77) were identified as nonmodifiable bleeding risk factors. Overall, 128 (1.9%) patients experienced major bleeding events; of these, 11% had no identified bleeding risk factors, 50% had nonmodifiable bleeding risk factors only, and 39% had modifiable bleeding risk factors (with or without nonmodifiable risk factors). The presence of 1 modifiable bleeding risk factor doubled the risk of major bleeding. Conclusions Elimination of modifiable bleeding risk factors is a potentially effective strategy to reduce bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation patients receiving rivaroxaban. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01606995.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alcohol Drinking; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Atrial Fibrillation; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

With safety concerns about increasing bleeding, off-label underdosing of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (NOACs) is common in East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We tried to investigate the pattern of NOAC underdosing and associated clinical outcomes in patients with AF who are indicated for standard dosing. Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we evaluated 16,568 patients with a new prescription of NOAC who are indicated for standard NOAC dosing and compared 4,536 patients with warfarin with respect to thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke or systemic embolization), all-cause mortality and major bleeding. Of the 16,568 patients indicated for standard NOAC dosing, 8,549 (51.9%) received off-label underdosing (50.6% rivaroxaban, 53.0% apixaban). During a median follow up of 15.0 months, as compared with warfarin, underdosing of rivaroxaban was associated with lower risks of major thromboembolic events (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41 to 0.69) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.82), and a similar risk of major bleeding (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.46). However, underdosing of apixaban was associated with similar risks of major thromboembolic events (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.16), all-cause mortality (HR 0.94, 95 CI: 0.71 to 1.24) and major bleeding (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.17). In conclusion, in this Korean population with AF who are indicated for standard NOAC dosing, off-label underdosing is common and its clinical benefit over warfarin was inconsistent according to types of NOAC. Notably, apixaban underdosing provides no benefit in effectiveness compared with warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Off-Label Use; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Since 2012 four direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Clinical trials comparing DOACs to warfarin included more than 13,500 patients. However, included patients were all age 39 years or older. We sought to describe real-world use of DOACs among young adults with acute VTE. Multi-center retrospective case series of young adult patients (age 18-40 years) at two large academic medical centers who initiated any DOAC for VTE therapy in 2015 or 2016. Thrombotic and bleeding events as well as off-label drug use were described using summary statistics. Fifty-seven patients were identified (63.2% female). One of the 57 patients (1.8%) had a thromboembolic event. Seven of the 57 patients (12.3%) experienced a bleeding event, one categorized as a major bleed and six being categorized as clinically relevant non-major bleeding. One of the ten (10%) patients receiving apixaban was not initiated on the FDA-recommended 10 mg twice daily for the first 7 days. Seven of the 47 (14.9%) patients receiving rivaroxaban were not initiated on the FDA-recommended 15 mg twice daily dosing for the first 21 days. Bleeding occurred in approximately 14% of young adult patients treated with DOAC therapy. However, only one patient had their DOAC discontinued due to a major bleeding event. Recurrence of DVT while on DOAC therapy was rare.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Age Factors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electronic Health Records; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Off-Label Use; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; United States; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Comorbidity; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Obesity; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thinness; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Randomized controlled trials leading to the approval of apixaban and rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism (VTE) did not include patients with upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UE-DVT). We sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban and apixaban for the treatment of acute UE-DVT. Consecutive patients with VTE enrolled into the Mayo Clinic VTE Registry, between March 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019, were followed prospectively. Clinical, demographic and imaging data were collected at the time of study recruitment. Patients with a diagnosis of acute UE-DVT who received rivaroxaban, apixaban, LMWH or warfarin were included. Recurrent VTE, major bleeding, clinical-relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and death were assessed at 3-month intervals. During the study period, 210 patients with acute UE-DVT were included; 63 were treated with apixaban, 39 with rivaroxaban, and 108 with LWMH and/or warfarin. Overall 51% had catheter-associated UE-DVT, 60% had a diagnosis of malignancy, and 14% had concurrent pulmonary embolism. Malignancy was more common in patients treated with LMWH/warfarin (67% vs 52%, P = .03). At 3 months of follow up, one (0.9%) recurrent VTE occurred in a patient treated with LMWH/warfarin and one (1.0%) patient treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban (P = .97). Major bleeding occurred in three patients treated with LMWH/warfarin, and in none of those treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban (P = .09). Clinical-relevant non-major bleeding occurred in one patient (0.9%) treated with LWMH/warfarin and two patients (2.0%) treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban (P = .53). Treatment of UE-DVT with apixaban or rivaroxaban appears to be as safe and effective as LMWH/warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Upper Extremity; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have a favorable bleeding risk profile in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the safety of individual DOACs relative to warfarin for specific bleeding outcomes is less certain. We identified 423,450 patients with AF between 2013 to 2015 in the NCDR PINNACLE national ambulatory registry matched to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database. Outcomes included time to first major bleed, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), major gastrointestinal bleed (GIB), or other major bleed. We estimated the association of OAC with bleeding using Cox proportional hazard models. The median duration of follow-up was 1.4 years. OACs were used in 64% of AF patients (66% warfarin, 15% rivaroxaban, 12% dabigatran, and 7% apixaban). A major bleeding event occurred in 6.9% of patients. Compared with warfarin users, fewer patients experienced ICH with the use of rivaroxaban (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.84), dabigatran (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.65), and apixaban (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.55 to 0.90). The risk of major GIB was higher in rivaroxaban users (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.27), and lower in dabigatran (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95) and apixaban (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95) users. For any DOAC versus warfarin, age (≥75 or <75 years) interacted with major bleeding (HR 0.93 vs 0.78; p <0.001), GIB (HR 1.10 vs 0.82; p <0.001), and other major bleeding (HR 0.93 vs 0.80; p <0.001). In conclusion, our results suggest that the safety of DOACs is superior to warfarin in AF patients, except with rivaroxaban and GIB. Age ≥75 years attenuated the relative safety benefits of DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Outpatients; Registries; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; United States; Warfarin

Drugs exhibiting high protein binding have potential increased action in patients with hypoalbuminemia. Rivaroxaban is 92-95% protein bound, but the clinical effects of rivaroxaban in patients with low albumin are largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between albumin and bleeding in rivaroxaban treated patients. This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults who received rivaroxaban and had an albumin level measured during admission between January and October 2017. Patients who experienced bleeding events while receiving rivaroxaban therapy where compared to those who did not. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between albumin levels and bleeding events. A total of 368 patients were included; 30 experienced a bleeding event and 338 did not. The mean ± standard deviation albumin level nearest to the time of rivaroxaban initiation was significantly lower in patients who experienced a bleeding event (3.0 ± 0.75 g/dL vs 3.66 ± 0.54 g/dL, p < 0.0001). The multivariable logistic regression model yielded an almost 4.5 fold higher risk of bleeding (adjusted odds ratio 4.405; 95% confidence interval 2.21-9) with any 1 g/dL reduction in albumin. Admission hemoglobin was also associated with bleed risk in the model. Albumin levels were significantly associated with bleed risk in patients receiving rivaroxaban. Albumin levels should be considered when evaluating candidates for rivaroxaban therapy.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypoalbuminemia; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Serum Albumin; United States

Evidence for the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to prevent cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality in older individuals with a low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is lacking. We sought to characterize the association of oral anticoagulant use with CV morbidity in elderly patients with or without reductions in eGFRs, comparing DOACs with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).. Population-based retrospective cohort study.. All individuals 66 years or older with an initial prescription for oral anticoagulants dispensed in Ontario, Canada, from 2009 to 2016.. DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) compared with VKAs by eGFR group (≥60, 30-59, and<30mL/min/1.73m. The primary outcome was a composite of a CV event (myocardial infarction, revascularization, or ischemic stroke) or mortality. Secondary outcomes were CV events alone, mortality, and hemorrhage requiring hospitalization.. High-dimensional propensity score matching of DOAC to VKA users and Cox proportional hazards regression.. 27,552 new DOAC users were matched to 27,552 new VKA users (median age, 78 years; 49% women). There was significantly lower risk for CV events or mortality among DOAC users compared with VKA users (event rates of 79.78 vs 99.77 per 1,000 person-years, respectively; HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90]) and lower risk for hemorrhage (event rates of 10.35 vs 16.77 per 1,000 person-years, respectively; HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.58-0.91]). There was an interaction between eGFR and the association of anticoagulant class with the primary composite outcome (P<0.02): HRs of 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92-1.12], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75-0.93], and 0.75 [95% CI, 0.51-1.10] for eGFRs of≥60, 30 to 59, and<30mL/min/1.73m. Retrospective observational study design limits causal inference; dosages of DOACs and international normalized ratio values were not available; low event rates in some subgroups limited statistical power.. DOACs compared with VKAs were associated with lower risk for the composite of CV events or mortality, an association for which the strength was most apparent among those with reduced eGFRs. The therapeutic implications of these findings await further study.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Brain Ischemia; Cause of Death; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Ontario; Procedures and Techniques Utilization; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombophilia; Vitamin K

To assess the safety (ie, risk of bleeding) and effectiveness (ie, risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE)) separately for four non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs; apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) versus warfarin in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), including those at high risk of bleeding and treated with reduced doses of NOACs.. We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records and claims data from 372 acute care hospitals in Japan for patients with NVAF newly initiated on NOACs or warfarin. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting with stabilised weights (s-IPTW). Bleeding risk and stroke/SE risk were expressed as HRs with 95% CIs. Two sensitivity analyses were conducted.. In patients with NVAF primarily treated with reduced-dose NOACs, the risks of stroke/SE and major bleeding were significantly lower with NOACs versus warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Electronic Health Records; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K; Warfarin

It remains unknown whether the comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin differs between atrial fibrillation patients with and without a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Using 2012 to 2014 Medicare claims data, we identified patients newly diagnosed with AF in 2013 to 2014 who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. We categorized patients based on a history of stroke or TIA. We constructed Cox proportional hazard models that included indicator variables for treatment groups, a history of stroke or TIA, and the interaction between them, and controlled for demographics and clinical characteristics. DOACs were generally more effective than warfarin in stroke prevention; however, there were important differences between subgroups defined by a history of ischemic stroke. In particular, the superiority of dabigatran compared with warfarin in ischemic stroke prevention was more pronounced in patients with a history of stroke or TIA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48 to 0.85) than in patients with no history of stroke or TIA (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.16; p value for interaction = 0.034). There was no difference in the risk of stroke between apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in patients with no history of stroke or TIA. However, in patients with a history of stroke or TIA, the risk of stroke was lower with dabigatran (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.85) and rivaroxaban (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.87), compared with apixaban (p value for both interactions <0.05). In conclusion, the comparative effectiveness of DOACs differs substantially between patients with and without a history of stroke or TIA; specifically, apixaban is less effective in patients with a history of stroke or TIA.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Medicare; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Background There is evidence that direct oral anticoagulants administered as potentially inappropriate medications increase the risk of bleeding and thromboembolic complications, which represent serious threats to human health. Objective To identify direct oral anticoagulants administered as potentially inappropriate medications for hospitalized patients aged ≥ 65 years in our hospital, and to determine associated factors and the correlation between potentially inappropriate medications and adverse reactions. Setting Xi'an Central Hospital, China. Method A retrospective cross-sectional study of elderly hospitalized patients who received either dabigatran or rivaroxaban at Xi'an Central Hospital between June 1, 2018 and June 1, 2019. The evaluation criteria of direct oral anticoagulants were formulated based on drug labels, disease guidelines and the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria, and any non-compliance with the criteria was considered to be potentially inappropriate medications. The Pearson chi-square test and a binary logistic regression model were used. Main outcome measure Factors associated with potentially inappropriate medications and correlation between potentially inappropriate medications and adverse reactions. Results This study analysed 315 patients aged ≥ 65 years. The application of our evaluation criteria identified 155 (49.2%) instances of potentially inappropriate medications, comprising 5 different types of potentially inappropriate medications. Fifteen adverse drug reactions occurred in the study participants. The Pearson chi-square test revealed significant differences in number of medications (p = 0.021) and creatinine clearance rate (p = 0.002) between potentially inappropriate medications and non-potentially inappropriate medications groups. In the binary logistic regression model, potentially inappropriate medications use was associated with creatinine clearance (creatinine clearance < 30: OR = 3.590, 95% CI = 1.214-10.615, p = 0.021), and there was no significant correlation between potentially inappropriate medications and adverse drug reactions after eliminating the confounding factors (age, length of hospitalization, number of disease combined) with p values of less than 0.25 (adjusted OR = 0.372, 95% CI = 0.117-1.182, p = 0.094). Conclusion This study revealed that the incidence of potentially inappropriate medications was relatively high, number of medications and creatinine clearance differed significantly b

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; China; Creatinine; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Inpatients; Length of Stay; Male; Polypharmacy; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism

The objective was to compare major bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; per type and dose) with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), irrespective of indication, using real-world data.. A population-based prospective cohort study, using the French national health data system (SNIIRAM), identified 47 469 adults living within 5 well-defined geographical areas, who were new users of oral anticoagulants in the period 2013-2015: 20 205 VKA users, 19 579 rivaroxaban users, 4225 dabigatran users and 3460 apixaban users. From all emergency departments within these areas, clinical data for all adults referred for bleeding was collected and medically validated. The databases were linked for common key variables. The main outcome measure was major bleeding: intracranial haemorrhage, major gastrointestinal bleeding and other major bleeding events. Hazard ratios were derived from adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. We used propensity score weighting as a sensitivity analysis, with separate analyses according to indications (atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism).. Compared to VKAs, high and low-dose DOACs were associated with a reduced risk of intracranial haemorrhage (adjusted hazard ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.82 and 0.54, 0.26-1.12 respectively), and a reduced risk of other major bleeding events (0.41, 0.29-0.58 and 0.41, 0.22-0.79 respectively), irrespective of duration and indication. Neither DOAC dose evidenced any significant difference from VKAs in terms of risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding.. There is a clear benefit of using DOACs with regard to intracranial haemorrhage. The study provides new insight into major gastrointestinal and other major bleeding events.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Oral factor Xa inhibitors (OFXais) may interfere with the heparin antifactor Xa (antiXa) assay. The best method to measure heparin activity during the transition from an OFXai to intravenous (IV) unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of transitioning from an OFXai to UFH.. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with supratherapeutic antiXa levels on UFH who received either apixaban or rivaroxaban within 72 hours before UFH initiation at NYU Langone Health. The primary objective was to identify the incidence of interference on the heparin antiXa assay due to OFXai exposure in the previous 72 hours. The secondary outcomes included the indication for transition to UFH and the rate of thromboembolic and bleeding events.. A total of 93 patients with supratherapeutic antiXa activity levels with prior OFXai use were reviewed. Moderate renal impairment, defined as creatinine clearance less than 49 mL/min, was present in 67 (72%) patients. The primary indication for transition from OFXai to UFH was in anticipation for a procedure, and it occurred in 37 (40%) patients. There were 3 major bleeding events and 3 clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events. No thromboembolic events occurred.. This study assessed the prevalence of supratherapeutic antiXa levels and clinical outcomes during the transition from OFXais to UFH. Health care systems should develop guidelines to assist clinicians in monitoring antiXa activity in patients undergoing a transition from an OFXai to UFH. It is also important to assess the patient's underlying thromboembolic and bleeding risks.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Tests; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism

No outside funding supported this commentary. The authors have nothing to disclose.

Topics: Age Factors; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Utilization Review; Early Termination of Clinical Trials; Eicosapentaenoic Acid; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Models, Economic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Black patients are under-represented in randomized trials evaluating oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in African Americans with NVAF.. We performed an analysis using Optum® De-Identified Electronic Health Record (EHR) data from 1/1/2012-9/30/2018. We included adult African American patients with a diagnosis of NVAF who were anticoagulant-naïve during the 12-months prior to initiation of rivaroxaban or warfarin. Patients receiving rivaroxaban were 1:1 propensity score matched to warfarin patients. Our primary effectiveness and safety outcomes were the 2-year incidence rates (%/year) of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleeding using an intention-to-treat approach. Cohorts were compared using doubly-robust Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. We matched 4102 rivaroxaban and 4102 warfarin users with a median (interquartile range) available follow-up of 2.0 (0.9, 2.0) years. Median CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED scores were 3 (2, 4) and 2 (1, 3). Rivaroxaban use was associated with a lower risk of SSE (1.99 versus 2.48, HR = 0.77, 95%CI = 0.60-0.99), ischemic stroke (1.84 versus 2.37, HR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.59-0.98) and major bleeding (4.22 versus 4.98, HR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.70-0.99). No differences in intracranial hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding were observed. Neither sensitivity analyses utilizing an on-treatment methodology nor inverse probability-of-treatment weighting showed significant differences in SSE or major bleeding between rivaroxaban and warfarin users.. Rivaroxaban appeared at least as effective and safe as warfarin when used to manage African American patients with NVAF in routine practice.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Black or African American; Embolism; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiac Tamponade; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Rivaroxaban

Clarithromycin is a commonly prescribed antibiotic associated with higher levels of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the blood, with the potential to increase the risk of hemorrhage.. To assess the 30-day risk of a hospital admission with hemorrhage after coprescription of clarithromycin compared with azithromycin among older adults taking a DOAC.. This population-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted among adults of advanced age (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [7.2] years) who were newly coprescribed clarithromycin (n = 6592) vs azithromycin (n = 18 351) while taking a DOAC (dabigatran, apixaban, or rivaroxaban) in Ontario, Canada, from June 23, 2009, to December 31, 2016. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between hemorrhage and antibiotic use (clarithromycin vs azithromycin). Statistical analysis was performed from December 23, 2019, to March 25, 2020.. Hospital admission with major hemorrhage (upper or lower gastrointestinal tract or intracranial). Outcomes were assessed within 30 days of a coprescription.. Among the 24 943 patients (12 493 women; mean [SD] age, 77.6 [7.2] years) in the study, rivaroxaban was the most commonly prescribed DOAC (9972 patients [40.0%]), followed by apixaban (7953 [31.9%]) and dabigatran (7018 [28.1%]). Coprescribing clarithromycin vs azithromycin with a DOAC was associated with a higher risk of a hospital admission with major hemorrhage (51 of 6592 patients [0.77%] taking clarithromycin vs 79 of 18 351 patients [0.43%] taking azithromycin; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.20-2.45]; absolute risk difference, 0.34%). Results were consistent in multiple additional analyses.. This study suggests that, among adults of advanced age taking a DOAC, concurrent use of clarithromycin compared with azithromycin was associated with a small but statistically significantly greater 30-day risk of hospital admission with major hemorrhage.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Clarithromycin; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban

Comparative effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and high polypharmacy are unknown.. We used Medicare administrative data to evaluate patients with new atrial fibrillation diagnosis from 2015 to 2017, who initiated an oral anticoagulant within 90 days of diagnosis. Patients taking ≤3, 4 to 8, or ≥9 other prescription medications were categorized as having low, moderate, or high polypharmacy, respectively. Within polypharmacy categories, patients receiving apixaban 5 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily, or warfarin were matched using a 3-way propensity score matching. Study outcomes included ischemic stroke, bleeding, and all-cause mortality.. The study cohort included 6985 patients using apixaban, 3838 using rivaroxaban, and 6639 using warfarin. In the propensity-matched cohorts there was no difference in risk of ischemic stroke between the 3 drugs in patients with low and moderate polypharmacy. However, among patients with high polypharmacy, the risk of ischemic stroke was higher with apixaban compared with warfarin (adjusted hazard ratio 2.34 [95% CI, 1.01-5.42];. Our study suggests that among patients with significant polypharmacy (>8 drugs), there may be a higher stroke and mortality risk with apixaban compared with warfarin and rivaroxaban. However, differences were of borderline significance.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polypharmacy; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a high-risk adverse drug reaction because of its associated risk of life- and limb-threatening thrombosis. Rivaroxaban may be considered as an ideal nonheparin anticoagulant alternative for the management of HIT. In this preliminary retrospective study, the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban to control the clinically suspected HIT (4Ts score 4 points or greater) were evaluated. Patients with chronic kidney disease, hepatic impairment, mechanical heart valves, and active bleeding were excluded. Forty-two eligible patients who received rivaroxaban for clinically suspected HIT were evaluated by medical records review, with 12-month follow-up after the first dose of rivaroxaban. End points included confirmed thrombosis (primary end point), mortality, and adverse treatment-related events. HIT-associated thrombosis was found in 17/42 (40.5%) patients before receiving rivaroxaban. After rivaroxaban therapy, platelet counts normalized in all patients, with only 1/42 (2.3%) patients developing new thrombosis. No hemorrhagic event was recorded in the patients. Twelve patients (28.6%) died, but the cause of death was not related to the thrombosis, hemorrhage, or adverse effects of rivaroxaban. Our findings are consistent with the available emerging data, suggesting that rivaroxaban is a safe and effective drug for the management of clinically suspected HIT. Rivaroxaban is a particularly valuable treatment option in developing countries, where there are issues of cost and availability of approved alternative agents.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Blood Platelets; Complementary Therapies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Count; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

To compare the effectiveness and safety of a drug in daily practice with the outcomes of a target non-inferiority trial by rigorously mimickingin an observational study the trial's design features.. This cohort study was conducted using the British Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to emulate the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) trial. Patients with atrial fibrillation who were newly prescribed (>=12 months of no use) either rivaroxaban or warfarinfrom October 2008 to December 2017 were included. Non-inferiority of rivaroxaban to warfarin in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism was assessed in different analysis populations (intention-to-treat [ITT], per-protocol [PP], and as-treated populations) using a hazardratio (HR) of 1.46 as the non-inferiority margin. Major bleeding (safety outcome) was also assessed and compared to that of the target trial. All outcomes were analyzed using Cox-proportional hazard analyses.. We included 25,473 incident users of rivaroxaban (n=4,008) or warfarin(n=21,465). Similar to the trial, non-inferiority in the primary out come was demonstrated in all three analysis populations: HR=1.04 (95%CI 0.84 to 1.30) (ITT), HR=0.98 (95%CI 0.70 to 1.38) (PP), and HR=1.11 (95%CI 0.86 to 1.42) (as-treated). Risk of major bleeding was also similar to the target trial.. The results of this study provide supportive evidence to the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and adds knowledge on the usefulness of emulating a non-inferiority trial to assess drug effectiveness.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The number of patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants is increasing worldwide. Although bleeding complications associated with direct oral anticoagulants are lower than those associated with vitamin K antagonists, the increased number of patients treated with these anticoagulants suggests that a higher absolute number of patients are at risk. Tube thoracostomy is an invasive procedure with a high risk of bleeding. To date, among direct oral anticoagulants, only dabigatran has a well-studied antidote to reverse its effects during emergency procedure or surgery. This report describes a case in which emergency placement of a tube thoracostomy, in a patient with type 2 respiratory failure due to left tension pneumothorax and receiving the anticoagulant rivaroxaban, in the pharmacokinetics phase with greater anticoagulant effect, did not result in bleeding greater than that typically encountered during such interventions. The procedure ended successfully with no acute complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Chest Tubes; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumothorax; Respiratory Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Thoracostomy; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the association of extremes in bodyweight (EBW) and outcomes in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding were compared between patients with bodyweight <60 kg, 60-120 kg, and >120 kg.. Consecutive patients enrolled in the Mayo Clinic VTE Registry (03/28/2013-8/31/2019) with acute VTE were followed prospectively. Patient status was assessed in person, by mailing a written questionnaire, or by a scripted phone interview.. Among 2577 patients with weight ranging from 27.0 kg to 263.2 kg, 2123 (82%) had a bodyweight between 60 and 120 kg, 223 (8.7%) had bodyweight < 60 kg, and 230 (8.9%) had bodyweight >120 kg. Patients with bodyweight <60 kg treated with DOACs had higher 3- and 6-month incidence of major bleeding compared to the bodyweight 60-120kg group (4.4% vs 1.1%, P = .03, and 4.4% vs 1.4%, P = .05, respectively). Patients with bodyweight >120 kg and cancer on rivaroxaban had higher VTE recurrence compared to bodyweight 60-120kg group (P = .01).. Treatment of acute VTE is associated with a higher incidence of bleeding in patients with bodyweight <60 kg. A higher VTE recurrence rate occurred only in cancer patients with bodyweight >120 kg on rivaroxaban.

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Body Weight; Disease Management; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Health Care Surveys; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) approved for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Data related to the risk factors associated with rivaroxaban-induced bleeding in patients with NVAF remain scarce in the community setting. We sought to investigate these bleeding risk factors in a racially diverse patient population.. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study based on a chart review of patients who received rivaroxaban from our outpatient pharmacy from January 2015 to April 2018 for NVAF. Any reported bleeding event (BE) was recorded as either major or minor bleeding event. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed.. Of the 327 patients included in our analysis, 105 (32%) were female, and the mean age was 62 ± 12 years. Among the included patients, 176 (54%) patients were black, 71 (22%) were white, 51 (15.6%) were Hispanic, 13 (4%) were Asian, and 15 (4.6%) belonged to other races. 89 (27.2%) of the patients had co-prescription of aspirin. A total of 24 (7.3%) patients developed BE, out of which 9 (2.7%) patients had a major BE, and 15 (4.5%) patients had minor BE. Non-fatal gastrointestinal bleeding and epistaxis were the most common type of BE. On multivariable analysis, concurrent aspirin use (81 to 325 mg) (P = 0.03; odds ratio (OR) 2.60 [1.08-6.28]) and increasing age (P = 0.00; OR 1.06 [1.01-1.11]) were independent predictors of BE.. In community practice, aspirin co-prescription is common among NVAF patients prescribed rivaroxaban. Increasing age and concurrent aspirin use are independent predictors of BE.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Current guidelines recommend anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) after a bioprosthetic valve replacement. There is minimal literature evaluating direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients who have just received a bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR). The purpose of this study was to investigate any differences in efficacy and safety for patients taking a DOAC, compared with warfarin, after a bioprosthetic AVR or MVR.. A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate anticoagulation in patients who received bioprosthetic valve replacements at a large teaching hospital from 2014 to 2018. Patients included in this study received either warfarin or a DOAC following bioprosthetic AVR or MVR, and were maintained on the same agent throughout the 6-month follow-up period. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of thromboembolic complications and the primary safety outcome was the incidence of major bleeding within 6 months following surgery. The rate of readmission was assessed as a secondary endpoint.. A total of 197 patients were included; 70 patients received warfarin and 127 patients received a DOAC (apixaban, n = 86; rivaroxaban, n = 40; dabigatran, n = 1). Three patients experienced thromboembolic events, all of which occurred in the DOAC group (0% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.20). Major bleeding occurred in 11 patients-two in the warfarin group and nine in the DOAC group (2.9% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.22). Sixty-one patients were readmitted within the 6-month time frame, with 26 readmissions in the warfarin group and 35 readmissions in the DOAC group (37% vs. 27%; p = 0.16).. This small, exploratory study found similar rates of thromboembolic complications and major bleeding events in patients who received a DOAC versus warfarin after a recent bioprosthetic AVR or MVR. This study was limited by its retrospective nature and its sample size. Larger, randomized controlled trials are needed to further determine the efficacy and safety of DOACs in this patient population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Bioprosthesis; Dabigatran; Female; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

A 46-year-old man with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and previous pulmonary embolism on anticoagulation with rivaroxaban was brought in to the hospital after a syncopal episode. He was found to be hypotensive and tachycardic and later admitted to the intensive care unit. Clinical presentation and laboratory findings were consistent with adrenal insufficiency. MRI revealed bilateral adrenal haemorrhage and he received appropriate steroid replacement therapy. Symptoms slowly subsided and anticoagulation regimen was changed to warfarin. Adrenal haemorrhage was likely caused by APS and rivaroxaban, which brings into question whether novel oral anticoagulants are safe in this patient population.

Topics: Adrenal Gland Diseases; Adrenal Insufficiency; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Studies evaluating the use of activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCCs) for DOAC-associated bleeding are sparse.. We conducted a retrospective study of patients receiving aPCC for DOAC-associated bleeding or for pre-operative optimization of hemostasis prior to urgent surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was hemostatic efficacy, the primary safety outcome was the 30-day thromboembolic complication rate.. Eighty-two patients were included in the analysis; 14 patients on dabigatran, 39 patients on rivaroxaban and 29 patients on apixaban. Fifty-four patients received aPCC for major bleeding and 28 patients prior to urgent surgery. Mean aPCC dosing was 2974 IU (SD ± 857 IU). Hemostasis was deemed effective by ISTH criteria in 50% of cases and "Good" or "Moderate" by Sarode criteria in 45.2% and 14.3% of cases, respectively. Surgical hemostasis was rated as "Normal" in 84% of cases pre-operative administration. Median pre-aPCC INR was 1.6 (IQR 0.5) and median post-aPCC INR was 1.2 (IQR 0.2) (p < 0.00001). Median pre-aPCC aPTT was 36 s (IQR 12.8), median post-aPCC aPTT was 29 s (IQR 9.8) (p = 0.0001). The 30-day thromboembolic event rate was 6.1%.. Further study is needed to characterize the hemostatic effects and thromboembolic risk of aPCC among patients with DOAC-associated bleeding or for attempted normalization of hemostasis prior to urgent surgery.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Hemostatics; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

The present article addresses clinical challenges associated with the choice of the anticoagulant agent, the definition of the duration of anticoagulant treatment and the assessment of the risk-to-benefit ratio of prolonged anticoagulation for patients with pulmonary embolism (PE).Anticoagulation is performed with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in hemodynamically unstable patients and with low molecular weight heparins (LWMH) or fondaparinux in normotensive patients. In patients with high or intermediate clinical probability of pulmonary embolism, anticoagulation should be initiated without delay while awaiting the results of diagnostic tests. LMWH and fondaparinux are preferred over UFH in the initial anticoagulation of PE since they are associated with a lower risk of bleeding.All patients with PE require therapeutic anticoagulation for at least three months. The current 2019 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommend that all eligible patients should be treated with a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) in preference to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA). In patients with active cancer, Apixaban, Edoxaban and Rivaroxaban are effective alternatives to treatment with LMWH.The decision on the duration of anticoagulation should consider both, the individual risk of PE recurrence and the individual risk of bleeding. The risk for recurrent PE after discontinuation of treatment is related to the features of the index PE event. While patients with a strong transient risk factor have a low risk of recurrence and anticoagulation can be discontinued after three months, patients with strong persistent risk factor (such as active cancer) have a high risk of recurrence and thus should receive anticoagulant treatment of indefinite duration. Given the favourable safety profile of NOACs (especially if a reduced dosage of Apixaban or Rivaroxaban is initiated after at least six months of therapeutic anticoagulation), extended oral anticoagulation of indefinite duration should be considered for all patients with intermediate risk of recurrence.

Topics: Acute Disease; Dalteparin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Guideline Adherence; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Long-Term Care; Neoplasms; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Acute Disease; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclophosphamide; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Stroke; Vitamin K

To determine a patient's clinical course based on the use of an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or heparin anti-Xa assay when transitioning from rivaroxaban or apixaban to an unfractionated heparin infusion.. A retrospective chart review was conducted to investigate how unfractionated heparin infusions were managed at a tertiary care hospital in the setting of recent apixaban or rivaroxaban administration. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts based on the chosen heparin infusion monitoring assay: heparin anti-Xa or aPTT. The primary composite outcome was total number of bleeding and thrombotic events; the secondary composite outcome was average incidence of heparin infusion holds and rate changes per patient.. Data were collected from 76 patients (heparin anti-Xa = 69, aPTT = 7). Due to the limited number of patients within the aPTT cohort, this data was excluded from the analysis, and heparin anti-Xa descriptive statistics were reported without statistical comparisons. In the heparin anti-Xa group, a total of 10 bleeds and 1 thrombus were discovered. Additionally, the average number of infusion holds and rate changes was 0.841 and 2.65 times per patient, respectively, for those patients monitored via heparin anti-Xa assay.. In the presence of a recently administered oral anti-Xa anticoagulant, more down-titrations occurred in the initial 6 hours of the heparin infusion when measuring anti-Xa activity, and most up-titrations occurred after 36 hours. Baseline heparin anti-Xa activity may be a useful tool to identify patients with residual plasma concentrations of apixaban and rivaroxaban to help better individualize heparin therapy.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hospitalization; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Middle Aged; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Tertiary Care Centers; Time Factors

Following the publication of the COMPASS trial, the European Medicines Agency has approved a regimen of combination of rivaroxaban 2.5mg twice daily and a daily dose of 75-100mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) at high risk of ischemic events. However, the applicability of such a therapeutic strategy in France is currently unknown.. To describe the proportion of patients eligible to COMPASS in France, their baseline clinical characteristics and the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, using the REACH registry.. From the the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry database, a large international registry of patients with, or at risk, of atherothrombosis, we analyzed patients included in France with either established CAD and/or PAD and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the COMPASS trial. The ischemic outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke, and serious bleeding were defined as haemorrhagic stroke or bleeding leading to hospitalization or transfusion.. Among more than 65000 patients enrolled in REACH, 2.012 patients were evaluable and enrolled in France. Among them, 1194 patients (59.3%) were eligible to COMPASS. The main reasons for exclusion of the COMPASS trial, were high bleeding risk (59.1%), anticoagulant use (43.4%), requirement for dual antiplatelet therapy within 1 year of an ACS or PCI (24.7%). In the "COMPASS eligible population", the rate of MACE (CV, MI and stroke) at 4 years follow-up was 13.4% [11.3-15.8], and serious bleeding was 2.5% at 4 years [1.6-3.4]. Patients with polyvascular disease (n=219) had the highest rate of MACE, compared with patients with CAD only and PAD only (19.1% [13.9-26.1] vs. 11.6% [9.1-14.8] vs 13.2% [9.2-18.8], P<0.0001, respectively).. The COMPASS therapeutic strategy in France appears to be applicable to more than half of CAD or PAD patients. This population appears at high residual risk of atherothrombotic events, and patients with polyvascular disease experienced the highest rate of events.

Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; France; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Bonaca MP, Bauersachs RM, Anand SS, et al.

Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban

The results of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) can mostly be applied to primary prevention in relatively young patients, since only a minority of patients included in these trials were receiving DOACs for secondary prevention. The real-life secondary prevention subgroup, comprising mostly elderly and high-risk patients, remains a point of interest where further exploration is needed. Our objective was to explore the effectiveness and safety of DOACs for secondary prevention in the real-life conditions.. In a six-year (2012-2018) period all consecutive patients with a history of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke, recorded NVAF and prescription of DOAC, were included in this single-centre registry. Choice of the DOAC and dose was based on the discretion of the attending clinician. Data regarding recurrent stroke/TIA or other embolic events, intracranial haemorrhage, other major bleeding, adherence and potential changes of therapy were collected and analysed.. During the study period, 566 patients were prescribed a DOAC for secondary stroke prevention, and follow-up data were available for 510 patients, with an average observational time of 2.6 years. The mean age of patients was 77.9 ± 8.7 years. The mean CHA. Our real-life data study suggests that secondary stroke prevention with DOACs is as effective and safe as primary prevention, both in standard and reduced doses, in a typical group of patients who are older than patients included in RCTs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke

Oral factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) can be administered in fixed doses without the need for routine laboratory monitoring. Anti-Xa assays can estimate anticoagulant effect for specific FXaI's. The aim of this study was to characterize anti-Xa levels in patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban with major bleeding events.. Apixaban and rivaroxaban anti-Xa assays ordered within our hospital system from May 2016 to September 2019 were evaluated. The primary outcome was major bleeding events defined by International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Median anti-Xa levels for each FXaI were calculated for those with and without major bleeding, as well as those who did and did not receive reversal agents.. A total of 606 anti-Xa levels were analyzed. There were 146 major bleeding events documented, with the most common site being intracranial (63%). Median anti-Xa levels in patients with and without major bleeding were similar, whereas those on apixaban therapy who received reversal agents typically had higher anti-Xa levels (73 ng/mL vs. 153 ng/mL, p = 0.0019). Factors significantly associated with increased odds of bleeding were an age > 80 years, inappropriately high dosing regimens, and modest anti-Xa levels (100-300 ng/mL) for rivaroxaban specifically.. Older age and inappropriately high dosing regimens were associated with major bleeding in patients taking apixaban and rivaroxaban. Further investigation into the utility of anti-Xa levels for FXaI is warranted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Loss, Surgical; Dabigatran; Elective Surgical Procedures; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Therapy Management; Perioperative Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Adjustment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

There is insufficient real-world data on the current status of Japanese patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) or its treatment and prevention with rivaroxaban.Methods and Results:In this multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted in Japan, 1,039 patients with acute symptomatic/asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) with or without DVT prescribed rivaroxaban were enrolled at 152 institutions and observed for a median of 21.3 months. Mean age was 68.0±14.7 years, mean body weight was 60.3±14.1 kg, 59.0% were females, and 19.0% had active cancer. Incidences of recurrence or aggravation of symptomatic VTE (primary effectiveness outcome) and major bleeding (principal safety outcome) were 2.6% and 2.9% per patient-year, respectively. These outcomes did not differ between patients with DVT and those with PE (primary effectiveness outcome: 2.6% vs. 2.5% per patient-year, P=0.810; principal safety outcome: 3.5% vs. 2.4% per patient-year, P=0.394). The incidence of composite clinically relevant events, including recurrence or aggravation of symptomatic VTE, acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, all-cause death, or major bleeding events, was 9.2% per patient-year. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex, being underweight, having active cancer, chronic heart and lung disease, and previous stroke were independent determinants for composite clinically relevant events.. In Japanese clinical practice, a single-drug approach with rivaroxaban was demonstrated to be a valuable treatment for a broad range of VTE patients.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are mostly prescribed to prevent cardioembolic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). An increasing number of guidelines recommend DOAC in AF patients with preserved renal function for the prevention of thromboembolism, and an increased use of DOAC in daily practice has been recorded also in elderly patients. Ageing is associated with a reduction in glomerular filtration rate, and impaired renal function, regardless of the cause, increases the risk of bleeding. Multiple medication use (polypharmacy) for treating superimposed co-morbidities is common in both elderly and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and drug-drug interaction may cause accumulation of DOAC, thereby increasing the risk of bleeding. The safety profile of DOAC in patients with CKD has not been defined with any certainty, particularly in those with severely impaired renal function or end stage renal disease. This has been due to the heterogeneity of studies and the relative paucity of data. This document reports the position of three Italian scientific societies engaged in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation who are treated with DOAC and present with CKD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Observational Studies as Topic; Polypharmacy; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Anticoagulant treatment of pediatric central venous catheter-related venous thromboembolism (CVC-VTE) has not been specifically evaluated. In EINSTEIN-Jr, 500 children with any VTE received rivaroxaban or standard anticoagulants. A predefined analysis of the CVC-VTE cohort was performed. Children with CVC-VTE (age, birth to 17 years) were administered rivaroxaban or standard anticoagulants during the 1-month (children <2 years) or 3-month (all other children) study period. Predefined outcomes were recurrent VTE, change in thrombotic burden on repeat imaging, and bleeding. Predictors for continuation of anticoagulant therapy beyond the study period were evaluated. One hundred twenty-six children with symptomatic (n = 76, 60%) or asymptomatic (n = 50, 40%) CVC-VTE received either rivaroxaban (n = 90) or standard anticoagulants (n = 36). There was no recurrent VTE (0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0%-2.8%). Three children had the principal safety outcome: none had major bleeding and 3 children had clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (2.4%; 95% CI, 0.7%-6.5%), all in the rivaroxaban arm. Complete or partial vein recanalization occurred in 57 (55%) and 38 (37%) of 103 evaluable children, respectively. Results were similar for symptomatic and asymptomatic CVC-VTE. Continuation of anticoagulant therapy beyond the study period occurred in 61 (48%) of children and was associated with residual VTE but only in children <2 years (odds ratio [OR], 20.9; P = .003) and continued CVC use (OR, 6.7; P = .002). Anticoagulant therapy appeared safe and efficacious and was associated with reduced clot burden in most children with symptomatic or asymptomatic CVC-VTE. Residual VTE and continued CVC use were associated with extended anticoagulation. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02234843.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Child; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

The attractiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists, in addition to a better benefit-risk ratio, stems from the fact that no therapeutic drug monitoring is deemed necessary. This has been recently mitigated by the fact that increased dabigatran (D) plasma levels have been associated with hemorrhages, and is currently under scrutiny of the European Medicines Agency. We aimed to evaluate, in real conditions of use, whether patients with out-of-range DOAC blood concentrations (too high or too low) were associated with bleeding or thrombosis. Patients treated with D or rivaroxaban (R) were prospectively included in a hospital cohort. D and R plasma levels were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-at the physician's demand. We defined concentration range as "expected" within the 95% confidence interval of the mean concentration obtained from pivotal trials, and "out of range" when concentrations were outside of that interval. A blind assessment of concentrations versus occurrence of bleeding or thrombosis was performed by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. Three hundred and twenty-two patients (mean age 78.5 years ± 13.1), treated with D or R were included consecutively. They had a mean CHA2DS2-VASc at 4.4 ± 1.7 and a mean HAS-BLED score at 1.7 ± 0.9. Irrespective of the DOAC prescribed, patients presenting with out-of-range concentrations had significantly more bleeding or thrombosis than patients with expected concentrations (P < 0.001). Patients with bleeding were more prone to have concentrations beyond the 95 percentile (N = 62, P < 0.001), whereas patients with thrombosis were more likely to have concentrations below the fifth percentile (N = 26, P < 0.05). The main risks associated with hemorrhages were abnormal concentrations, a high HAS-BLED score, the patient's age, and the creatinine blood level. For thrombosis, a concentration below the fifth percentile was the only risk factor that was significant in our cohort. While D and R under current recommendation have a better benefit-risk ratio than warfarin, their safe usage could be further optimized by some degree of therapeutic monitoring.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Blood Coagulation; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Although the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban is recommended for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation based on Phase III clinical trials, there is still a need for additional safety data from everyday clinical practice. The ROSE study was initiated to collect further information on the safety and utilisation of rivaroxaban in a broader range of patient groups in routine clinical practice.. The ROSE study was conducted in hospitals in England and Wales. Consenting adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation newly started on rivaroxaban were eligible and followed up for 12 weeks. Data was derived through secondary use of medical records. The primary outcome was major bleeding within gastrointestinal, urogenital and intracranial sites. A total of 4846 patients were enrolled in the study September 2013 to January 2016, 965 of which were treated with rivaroxaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The median age in the rivaroxaban non-valvular atrial fibrillation cohort was 76 years, 53.6% were male. The median HAS-BLED score was 2 and the median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4. The risk of major bleeding within each of the primary sites of gastrointestinal, urogenital and intracranial during the 12 week observation period was low (0.2%; n = 2). The risk of major bleeding in all sites was 1.0% (n = 10) at a rate of 5.5 events per 100 patient years.. In terms of the primary outcome risk of major bleeding within gastrointestinal, urogenital and intracranial sites during the 12 week observation period, the risk estimates in the non-valvular atrial fibrillation rivaroxaban user population were low (<1%), and consistent with risk estimated from clinical trial data and in routine clinical practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; England; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Care; Stroke; Wales

Controversy exists regarding first-line use of the recently approved reversal agent andexanet alfa due to limitations of the ANEXXA-4 study, thrombotic risks, and high medication acquisition cost. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 4F-PCC for the reversal of emergent oral fXa inhibitor-related bleeding. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate a subgroup using strict ANNEXA-4 patient selection criteria.. This was a retrospective study conducted utilizing chart review of adult patients that received 4F-PCC for oral fXa inhibitor-related bleeding. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinical success defined as achieving excellent or good hemostatic effectiveness following the administration of 4F-PCC. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality and arterial/venous thromboembolism, and cost compared with andexanet alfa.. A total of 119 patients were included, with 83 patients in the ANNEXA-4 criteria subgroup. Eighty-five of the 119 patients (71%) required reversal due to intracranial bleeding. Prior to reversal, 70 patients (59%) were taking apixaban and 49 patients (41%) were taking rivaroxaban. Clinical success was achieved in 106 of 119 patients (89%) and 74 of 83 patients (90%) in the strict criteria subgroup. Three of 119 patients (2.5%) had a thrombotic event during hospital stay and the overall mortality rate was 13%. The average cost increase of andexanet alfa compared to 4F-PCC would have been $29,500 per patient.. Administration of 4F-PCC for the reversal of oral fXa inhibitors was effective with relatively low thrombotic risk. Further direct prospective comparison of 4F-PCC to andexanet alfa is warranted.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antidotes; Blood Coagulation Factors; Drug Costs; Emergencies; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the differences in the characteristics and clinical outcomes of recently diagnosed patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving different types of anticoagulants in a real-life setting.. We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 1000 consecutive patients with non-valvular AF diagnosed at our institution or referred it to from 2013 to 2018.. Over the observed period, the frequency of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy use significantly increased (P = 0.002). Patients receiving warfarin had more unfavorable thromboembolic and bleeding risk factors than patients receiving DOAC. Predetermined stroke and major bleeding risks were similarly distributed among the dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban groups. Patients receiving warfarin had shorter time-to-major bleeding (TTB), time to thrombosis (TTT), and overall survival (OS) than patients receiving DOACs. After adjustment for factors unbalanced at baseline, the warfarin group showed significantly shorter OS (hazard ratio 2.27, 95% confidence interval 1.44-3.57, P<0.001], while TTB and TTT did not significantly differ between the groups. Only 37% of patients on warfarin had optimal dosing control, and they did not differ significantly in TTB, TTT, and OS from patients on DOACs.. Warfarin and DOACs are administered to different target populations, possibly due to socio-economic reasons. Patients receiving warfarin rarely obtain optimal dosing control, and experience significantly shorter survival compared with patients receiving DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate; Warfarin; Young Adult

It's estimated that 40% to 60% of patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery of the hip or knee who do not receive thromboprophylaxis will develop deep venous thrombosis Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia has established a guideline to prevent DVT with the administration of the Enoxaparin. Recently, institute stakeholders have been questioning this guideline as new oral anticoagulants that offer more comfort and efficacy, but present higher risk of bleeding, have been appearing in the market for treating deep venous thrombosis.. This study aims to validate the application of a multicriteria decision analysis in a real-world problem, the use of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin to prevent deep venous thrombosis.. The multicriteria method MACBETH (Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique) was used in a decision conferencing process to develop an evaluation model for measuring the relative value of the drugs on each evaluation criterion, separately and globally. The model-building process was informed by a literature review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a critical appraisal of the evidence.. We report a model-structure with eight criteria, each one associated with a weighting coefficient and value function. Following a simple additive aggregation process, the model-outputs showed that Rivaroxaban was considered a robust option for DVT. Sensitivity analysis and robustness analysis were performed and testify the consistency of the results.. This article contributes to literature by showing how MACBETH method can be combined with scientific evidence and participatory group processes, for health technology assessment in hospitals.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Brazil; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Orthopedic Procedures; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Postoperative Complications; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thrombosis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased stroke and bleeding risk in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Little is known about the real-life use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in CKD stage G4. In a retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 182 consecutive AF patients with CKD stage G4 including 90 (49%) subjects on NOAC, ie, 61 on apixaban 2.5 mg bid and 29 on rivaroxaban 15 mg qd, and 92 (51%) subjects on warfarin. Thromboembolic and bleeding events were recorded during a mean follow-up of 26.3 months. There were no differences in demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables at baseline between the 2 treatment groups. During follow-up, arterial thromboembolic events occurred in 11 (12.22%) subjects on NOAC and 7 (7.61%) on warfarin, (hazard ratio [HR] 1.70; 95% CI, 0.65-4.42), with similar risk of ischemic stroke (9 [10%] vs. 7 [7.61%], P = 0.56, respectively). Major bleedings or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 14 (15.56%) on NOAC and 13 (14.13%) on warfarin, (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.53-2.39), with similar risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.20-2.47). We observed no difference in all-cause mortality related to the type of anticoagulants, but it tended to be lower in the apixaban group compared with rivaroxaban group (14.7% vs. 31%, P = 0.07), without any differences in thromboembolic and bleeding events. The study suggests that AF patients with CKD stage G4 receiving reduced-dose NOAC or warfarin have similar risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in everyday practice of a tertiary anticoagulation center.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Poland; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of aspirin and rivaroxaban in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following either total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty.. A comprehensive literature search of several electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) was conducted to identify relevant studies. Outcomes of interest included VTE rate, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) rate, pulmonary embolism rate, major bleeding events, mortality rate, blood transfusion, and wound complication. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated using a fixed-effects model or random-effects model.. A total of 8 studies with 97,677 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with rivaroxaban, aspirin had a significantly higher incidence of DVT (RR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.27, 1.72; P < .001), and decreased risk of blood transfusion (RR = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.93, 0.94; P < .001). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 drugs in terms of total VTE rate (RR = 1.39%, 95%CI: 0.94, 2.05; P = .101), pulmonary embolism rate (RR = 1.64, 95%CI: 0.92, 2.92; P = .094), mortality rate (RR = 1.13, 95%CI: 0.15, 8.27; P = .907), major bleeding (RR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.44, 2.27; P = .995), and wound complication rate (RR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.07, 1.87; P = .229).. Our results suggested that aspirin and rivaroxaban offered similar effect in the prevention of VTE after total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. However, rivaroxaban seemed to have better effect than aspirin in reducing the risk of DVT, and aspirin was safer than rivaroxaban in decreasing the blood transfusion rate.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Aspirin; Blood Transfusion; Hemorrhage; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Surgical Wound Infection; Systematic Review as Topic; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

The aim of this study is to assess patterns of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in an inpatient hospital setting.. A retrospective chart review was conducted at the Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center (BUHMC) from January 2014 to November 2016. All adult patients admitted to the BUHMC who were treated with a DOAC for at least 3 days were screened. Among them, those who received selected interacting drugs at any time during the course of DOAC therapy were included in this study.. This study included 165 patients with an average of 73 years (standard deviation [SD] = 12.3) and 233 cases. The most commonly used concomitant drug with a DOAC was aspirin (58%), followed by amiodarone (16%) and P2Y. Despite computerized DDI alerts, potentially significant DDIs with DOACs still occur. While the present study provides insight into the current patterns of DDIs, further studies are needed to evaluate clinical outcomes of the potential DDIs with DOACs in practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Dabigatran; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitals, Urban; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

In Japanese surveillance in an early phase after the approval of rivaroxaban, inappropriate underdose was frequently utilized. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and predictors of the inappropriate usage of rivaroxaban in a single-center, cardiovascular-specialized hospital. Consecutive 661 non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients treated with rivaroxaban between 2012 and 2017 were recruited. After excluding 30 patients without assessment of creatinine clearance (CCr), the proportion and predictors of inappropriate underdose were analyzed. Additionally, patient outcomes, including thromboembolism (ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) and major bleeding, were determined. In patients with CCr ≥ 50 mL/min (n = 532) and < 50 mL/min (n = 98), inappropriate underdose and overdose were used in 123 (23%) and 8 (8%), respectively. The predictors of inappropriate underdose (in patients with CCr ≥ 50 mL/min) were CCr [50-63 mL/min (the lowest tertile) compared to ≥ 64 mL/min], age ( ≥ 75 years), female gender, prescription of antiplatelet, and coexistence of heart failure. Although PT under rivaroxaban was lower in patients with inappropriate underdose than in those with an appropriate dose, no significant increase in the incidence of thromboembolism or major bleeding was observed within the mean follow-up of 683 days. Inappropriate underdose of rivaroxaban was frequently observed for NVAF patents even in a cardiovascular hospital, particularly in patients with CCr adjacent to the dose reduction criteria. The responses of PT and the incidence of adverse outcomes under an inappropriate dose of rivaroxaban should be further investigated.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Creatinine; Drug Utilization; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Japan; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prothrombin Time; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The ATRIA, Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment (ORBIT), and modified (m) HAS-BLED (excluding a labile international normalized ratio element from the HAS-BLED score) scores are currently used to predict the bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients receiving oral anticoagulant treatment. We assessed the usefulness of these scores in estimating the catheter ablation (CA)-related bleeding risk in AF patients from the Japanese Anti-Coagulation Regimen Exploration in AF Catheter Ablation Registry (JACRE).. We investigated 1322 consecutive patients enrolled in the prospective, multicenter JACRE registry of AF patients receiving CA. The patients also received rivaroxaban (n=1118) or warfarin (n=204) during the perioperative period and complications were monitored for 30 days post-surgery.. Periprocedural bleeding complications occurred in 42 patients (3.2%) and were significantly associated with the mHAS-BLED [hazard ratio=1.46, 95% confidence interval (1.06-2.01)], ATRIA [1.16 (1.00-1.35)], and ORBIT [1.29 (1.06-1.57)] scores. However, only the mHAS-BLED score predicted a significantly greater bleeding prevalence in the high-score group than in the low-score group stratified by a threshold maximizing the sensitivity and specificity (threshold=3, p<0.001). The incidence of all bleeding complications was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban cohort in patients with a mHAS-BLED score ≥3 (rivaroxaban vs. warfarin cohort, 5.56% vs. 25%, p=0.028).. All three common bleeding scores were associated with a periprocedural risk of CA-related bleeding in AF patients and a mHAS-BLED score ≥3 best distinguished high-risk patients from low-risk patients.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban (Xarelto; Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc) is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) that works by directly inhibiting the active site of factor Xa (FXa). Rivaroxaban is metabolized and cleared via the kidney and liver. The results of various studies have shown that patients with severe renal impairment should receive reduced dosages of rivaroxaban or another anticoagulant due to impaired clearance. Although it is not required, monitoring rivaroxaban is useful in some conditions; however, the assays required for such monitoring are not readily available. Herein, we present a case of a 68-year-old Caucasian male patient who was receiving rivaroxaban (20 mg/day) for atrial flutter and had mild renal impairment. The patient was found to have increased effect of rivaroxaban due to further impairment of renal clearance caused by several renally cleared medications. This case highlights the importance of closely examining the renal function of and medication list for a patient before starting DOACs such as rivaroxaban.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Flutter; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Prothrombin Time; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Antiplatelet therapy (APT) use in combination with oral anticoagulation is common among patients with atrial fibrillation, but there is scarce information regarding its effect on outcomes in patients on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of APT use in a 'real-world' cohort of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients initiating NOAC.. We conducted a retrospective multicentre study including 2361 consecutive NVAF patients initiating NOAC between January 2013 and December 2016. Patients with an acute ischaemic event within the last 12 months (acute coronary syndrome, stroke or revascularization) were excluded. Patients were followed up, and all clinical events were recorded at 3 months. The primary outcome of the study was major bleeding, and the secondary outcomes were stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, intracranial bleeding and death.. One hundred forty-five (6.1%) patients received concomitant APT, and aspirin was the more common (79%). At 3 months, 25 (1.1%) patients had major bleeding, 8 (0.3%) had nonfatal myocardial infarction, 7 (0.3%) had ischaemic stroke, and 40 (1.7%) died. After multivariate adjustment, concomitant APT was associated with higher risk for major bleeding (HR = 3.62, 95% CI 1.32-9.89; P = .012), but was not associated with a higher risk of other clinical outcomes.. Concomitant APT use is uncommon among these patients and does not seem to be associated with lower rates of ischaemic events or death. However, there are signals for an increased risk of bleeding, which reinforces current guideline recommendations.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were developed to overcome some of the limitations associated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), such as interindividual variability or the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. However, the complexity of DOAC dose regimens can still lead to dosing errors and potential bleeding-related or thromboembolic adverse events, especially in the elderly.. Our objective was to evaluate the rate of inappropriate preadmission DOAC prescriptions at hospital and to evaluate the ability of hospitals to correct them.. An observational prospective study was conducted in elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) hospitalized in six acute units of three Parisian university hospitals between February and July 2018. DOAC prescriptions prior to admission and at discharge were analyzed according to the guidelines in the summaries of product characteristics.. A total of 157 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 84 years (interquartile range [IQR] 77-89). The median glomerular filtration rate, determined with the Cockcroft-Gault equation, was 48 mL/min (IQR 35-61). Apixaban was the most frequently prescribed drug, mainly for atrial fibrillation. Overall, 48 (30.6%) and 34 (22.4%) prescriptions were inappropriate prior to admission and at discharge, respectively, showing a significant decrease (p < 0.001). Hospitals significantly corrected more inappropriate prescriptions (37.5%) than they generated (4.6%) (p < 0.05). The nature of the inappropriate prescribing was underdosing (68.8% and 76.5% prior to admission and at discharge, respectively), followed by overdosing (stable rate at almost 20%) and indication errors. No risk factors for inappropriate use were identified by our analysis.. One-third of DOAC preadmission prescriptions for elderly patients were inappropriate, indicating that a need remains to strengthen DOAC prescribing guidelines in ambulatory clinical practice. However, the rate of inappropriate prescriptions decreased at patient discharge. Future studies are needed to test actions to promote the proper use of DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; France; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Male; Patient Admission; Patient Discharge; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism

Topics: Aspirin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Rivaroxaban

Prior stroke is a risk factor for stroke and bleeding during anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although rivaroxaban is widely prescribed to reduce their risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF), the real-world evidence on rivaroxaban treatment is limited. We aimed to examine the outcomes of rivaroxaban treatment in NVAF patients with prior ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) by using the data of the Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety and Effectiveness Study in Japanese -Patients with AF, a prospective, single-arm, observational study.. The clinical outcomes of 9,578 patients who completed the 1-year follow-up were evaluated. Safety and effectiveness outcomes were compared between patients with and without prior ischemic stroke/TIA.. Among the patients, 2,153 (22.5%) had prior ischemic stroke/TIA. They were significantly older and had lower body weight, lower creatinine clearance, higher CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and modified HAS-BLED scores as compared to those without prior ischemic stroke/TIA. Any bleeding (9.1 vs. 7.2 events per 100 patient-years), major bleeding (2.3 vs. 1.6 events per 100 patient-years), and stroke/non-central nervous system systemic embolism/myocardial infarction (3.4 vs. 1.3 events per 100 patient-years) were more frequent in patients with prior ischemic stroke/TIA. Stepwise regression analysis suggested that body weight of ≤50 kg and diabetes mellitus were predictive of major bleeding in patients with prior ischemic stroke/TIA.. Safety and effectiveness event rates were higher in patients with prior ischemic stroke/TIA than those without. This might be explained by differences in several risk profiles including age, body weight, renal function, and risk scores such as CHADS2 between the groups. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01582737.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) with low-dose rivaroxaban in combination with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is available to patients with stable atherosclerotic disease as a new therapeutic option.The results of the COMPASS trial demonstrate a significant relative risk reduction of cardiovascular outcomes by 24 % with low-dose DAT in patients with stable peripheral arterial disease or coronary heart disease.Despite a guideline adherent secondary prevention therapy, the cardiovascular event rate with ASA alone during the mean study period of almost two years was 5.4 %. The absolute reduction of the event rate by the low-dose DAT is low at 1.3 %. Consequently, it is important to identify groups of patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. These patients are particularly qualified to receive a DAT regimen and can be characterized using high-risk features.The individual ischemic risk profile may be further defined by the presence of polyvascular atherosclerosis, concomitant diseases, and ischemic events in the past. The quo ad vitam reduced prognosis of patients with polyvascular atherosclerosis advocates a polyvascular screening, even in supposedly stable patients with coronary heart disease and peripheral arterial disease.An intensification of antithrombotic therapy is naturally associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Therefore, the risk-reduction of ischemic events should be weighed individually against the risk of bleeding.A low-dose DAT is particularly suitable for patients with a high ischemic risk and a low risk of bleeding.. Die duale antithrombotische Therapie (DAT) mit Rivaroxaban in niedriger Dosis in Kombination mit Acetylsalicylsäure (ASS) steht für Patienten mit STABILER: Atherosklerose als neue therapeutische Option zur Verfügung 1.Die Ergebnisse der COMPASS-Studie zeigen unter der niedrig dosierten DAT eine deutliche relative Risikoreduktion der kardiovaskulären Endpunkte um 24 % bei Patienten mit stabiler peripherer arterieller Verschlusskrankheit (PAVK) oder koronarer Herzerkrankung (KHK) 2.Trotz einer leitliniengerechten medikamentösen Sekundärprophylaxe liegt die kardiovaskuläre Ereignisrate unter ASS während der mittleren Studiendauer von fast 2 Jahren bei 5,4 %. Die absolute Reduktion der Ereignisrate durch die niedrig dosierte DAT ist mit 1,3 % gering. Umso wichtiger ist es, anhand von HOCHRISIKOMERKMALEN: Patientengruppen mit einer schlechteren kardiovaskulären Prognose und höherer Ereignisrate zu identifizieren, die sich für diesen Therapieansatz besonders qualifizieren 3. POLYVASKULäRE ATHEROSKLEROSE:  Die quo ad vitam reduzierte Prognose der Patienten mit einer polyvaskulären Atherosklerose spricht für ein polyvaskuläres Screening, auch bei vermeintlich stabilen KHK- und PAVK-Patienten. Das individuelle ischämische Risikoprofil kann durch das Vorhandensein einer polyvaskulären Atherosklerose, von Begleiterkrankungen und bereits stattgehabten ischämischen Ereignissen näher bestimmt werden. EINSCHRäNKUNGEN DER ANWENDUNG:  Die niedrig dosierte Gabe von Rivaroxaban zusätzlich zur ASS-Therapie ersetzt keine therapeutische Antikoagulation. Ebenfalls liegen für die stabile Atherosklerose bisher keine Daten zu einer niedrig dosierten Rivaroxaban-Therapie und einer begleitenden dualen Thrombozytenaggregationshemmung (DAPT) vor. Aus diesem Grund kann eine Therapie nach dem „COMPASS-Schema“ nach einer endovaskulären Therapie in der klinischen Praxis frühestens nach dem Ende der DAPT begonnen werden.. Eine Intensivierung der antithrombotischen Therapie ist naturgemäß mit einer Erhöhung des Blutungsrisikos verknüpft. Daher ist die Reduktion des ischämischen Risikos individuell gegenüber dem Risiko einer Blutung abzuwägen. Eine niedrig dosierte DAT kommt besonders für Patienten mit hohem Ischämie-Risiko und niedrigem Blutungsrisiko infrage.

Topics: Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Diseases; Hemorrhage; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Progression; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Readmission; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Rivaroxaban is one of the new anti-coagulants that inhibit Factor Xa and rarely cause rectus sheath hematoma and retroperitoneal haemorrhage which are uncommon, life-threatening complications. Here is a case of an elderly patient on rivaroxaban therapy for the stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation who developed rectus sheath hematoma and retroperitoneal bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hematoma; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rectus Abdominis; Retroperitoneal Space; Rivaroxaban; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

BACKGROUND Adrenal hemorrhage is an uncommon and under-recognized disorder with a wide array of etiologies ranging from pregnancy to septic shock. It is one of the complications of anticoagulation therapy, including direct anticoagulant medications. CASE REPORT Here, we present a case of a 68-year-old female with recent right knee arthroplasty who was on rivaroxaban for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis presented to the emergency department (ED) for severe acute onset abdominal pain, computed tomography (CT) of abdomen and pelvis revealed possible left adrenal hemorrhage that was confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). On repeat CT, her unilateral adrenal hemorrhage converted to a bilateral adrenal hemorrhage (BAH) and, as a result, the patient developed adrenal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS An undiagnosed and untreated adrenal hemorrhage can have catastrophic consequences, leading to adrenal insufficiency with potential shock and death. Therefore, it is important for clinicians to have an increased awareness and knowledge about adrenal hemorrhage.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adrenal Glands; Adrenal Insufficiency; Aged; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Blood Coagulation Factors; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban

In the last two decades a group of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has been developed that directly block the activity of thrombin or activated factor X. No randomized controlled trials have been conducted to verify their efficacy and safety in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation. Few studies compared NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) with classic anticoagulants in this unique group, and the results of these analyses remain controversial and inconclusive. Simple extrapolation of recommendations from the general population may be erroneous and lead to an increased risk of complications. Several controlled randomized trials with oral direct anticoagulants in hemodialysis patients are currently underway.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Patients with gynecologic malignancies are at an increased risk for venous thromboembolism. National guidelines recommend treatment of an acute venous thromboembolism with low molecular weight heparin for 5-10 days followed by long-term secondary prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for at least six months. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are not currently recommended to be used in cancer patients for the management of venous thromboembolism because robust data on their efficacy and safety have yet to become available in cancer patients. The objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of gynecologic oncology patients with venous thromboembolism using rivaroxaban compared to warfarin or low molecular weight heparin as well as compare the safety and efficacy of these anticoagulants.. This study was a retrospective pilot analysis of adult patients with gynecologic malignancies who received either rivaroxaban, warfarin or low molecular weight heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolism at Augusta University Medical Center from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2015. Statistical comparisons between the enoxaparin and rivaroxaban group were made using T-tests and Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, where appropriate.. Out of the 49 patients, 37% (18) patients were on rivaroxaban, 53% (26) on enoxaparin, and 10% (5) on warfarin. Only one patient (4%) in the enoxaparin group experienced a recurrent deep vein thrombosis while there were no cases of recurrent venous thromboembolism in the rivaroxaban and warfarin group. The incidence of major bleeding was 17% (. A high proportion of our gynecologic oncology patients received rivaroxaban for the management of venous thromboembolism. The sample size of this pilot analysis was too small to draw any conclusions regarding efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin and warfarin. High rate of rivaroxaban use in gynecologic oncology patients at our institution highlights the need for larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials to confirm the safety and efficacy of its use in this population.

Topics: Academic Medical Centers; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Drug Substitution; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Report bleeding incidences associated with rivaroxaban in adult patients with solid tumor malignancies requiring anticoagulation therapy.. This retrospective review was conducted at Indiana University Health, University Hospital and the Simon Cancer Center in Indianapolis, IN from January 2013 - February 2016. Patients were included if they had a solid tumor malignancy and prescribed rivaroxaban. Data were collected on 144 patients. Major bleeding was defined as bleeding requiring treatment (local, systemic treatment, blood cell transfusions) or hospitalization and minor bleeding was defined as bleeding not requiring treatment or hospitalization.. Sixty-four (44%) patients experienced bleeding while on rivaroxaban. There were six cancer types that had a higher incidence of bleeding: bladder, breast, melanoma, pancreas, prostate, and renal cell cancers; 40% (6/15) of patients with bladder cancer experienced bleeding; 54% (7/13) with breast cancer experienced bleeding; 40% (4/10) of patients with melanoma experienced bleeding; 58% (11/19) of patients with pancreatic cancer experienced bleeding; 45% (10/22) of patients with prostate cancer experienced bleeding; and 56% (5/9) of patients with renal cell carcinoma experienced bleeding. No other data collected identified increased incidence of bleeding.. Patients on rivaroxaban with a diagnosis of bladder, breast, melanoma, pancreas, prostate, or renal cell cancers had a higher incidence of bleeding compared to other solid tumors. Major bleeding was higher in bladder, breast, pancreas, and renal cell carcinomas, while minor bleeding was higher in patients with melanoma and prostate cancer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Electronic Health Records; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Death; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombosis; Vascular Diseases

To compare the effectiveness and safety of standard-dose rivaroxaban (20 mg o.d.) and warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with a non-sex-related CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1.. Analysis of United States Truven MarketScan claims from November 2011 to December 2016 for anticoagulant-naïve NVAF patients with a single non-sex-related stroke risk factor assigned 1-point in the CHA2DS2-VASc score and ≥12-months of continuous medical/prescription insurance coverage prior to the qualifying oral anticoagulant dispensing. Standard-dose rivaroxaban users were 1:1 propensity score-matched to warfarin users. Patients were followed until outcome occurrence, insurance disenrollment, or end of data availability. Primary outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding and were compared using Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In all, 3319 rivaroxaban users were 1:1 propensity score-matched to 3319 warfarin users. Median (interquartile range) duration of follow-up was 1.6 (0.7, 2) years and the most common qualifying stroke risk factor was hypertension (n = 4532, 68.3%). Rivaroxaban was associated with a significant reduction in the 1-year stroke or systemic embolism vs. warfarin (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.98), with no significant difference in overall major bleeding (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.44-1.26) or major bleeding subtypes (HR ranging from 0.33 to 0.78, P > 0.05 for all). Similar results were seen after extending follow-up to 2 years.. Rivaroxaban may lower the rate of stroke or systemic embolism vs. warfarin in NVAF patients with a non-sex-related CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1 without impacting major bleeding.

Topics: Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Databases, Factual; Decision Support Techniques; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Based on Phase III data, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are recommended for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. To determine whether trial outcomes translate into similar event rates in unselected patients, this analysis compared outcomes from the real-world XANTUS study with those from the Phase III ROCKET AF study.. Individual patient data from 4020 XANTUS patients were re-weighted to match the proportion of selected baseline characteristics in 7061 rivaroxaban-treated patients from ROCKET AF, using the matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) method. For the primary analysis, CHADS2 scores and gender were selected as relevant variables. Adjusted annualized incidence rates for XANTUS were calculated and compared with incidence rates from ROCKET AF-the ratio of these rates ('MAIC ratio') was used as a relative effect estimate. Rates of major bleeding [3.10%/year vs. 3.60%/year; MAIC ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.12] and stroke/non-central nervous system systemic embolism (1.54%/year vs. 1.70%/year; MAIC ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.62-1.32) were similar between XANTUS and ROCKET AF. The rate of all-cause death was higher in XANTUS (3.22%/year vs. 1.87%/year; MAIC ratio 1.72; 95% CI 1.31-2.27), but the rates of vascular death were similar (1.83%/year vs. 1.53%/year; MAIC ratio 1.19; 95% CI 0.84-1.70). Sensitivity analyses weighted by different baseline characteristics supported these results.. The low rates of major bleeding and stroke in XANTUS were consistent with results from ROCKET AF. All-cause death, but not vascular death, was higher in XANTUS, as expected in an unselected real-world population.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Optimal antithrombotic therapy after lower limb infrainguinal revascularization remains a controversial topic. The use of anticoagulants, alone or in combination with antiplatelet drugs, can potentially improve patency rate and limb salvage, particularly in patients with risk factors for early thrombosis. Bleeding is the main complication of long-term anticoagulant use. New oral anticoagulants can represent an attractive alternative to the standard vitamin K antagonists. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness (bypass occlusion and major amputation) and safety (major bleeding and all-cause mortality) of rivaroxaban compared to acenocumarol after infrainguinal lower limb surgical revascularization.. Retrospective cohort study of patients with peripheral arterial disease submitted to lower limb infrainguinal bypass revascularization with vein or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene conduit, who were anticoagulated with acenocumarol or rivaroxaban after hospital discharge. Patients with proximal revascularization, revascularization due to any pathology other than peripheral arterial disease, coagulation disorder, stroke or acute myocardial infarction in less than 30 days, glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min, or on hemodialysis were excluded.. One hundred nine patients were included (78.9% male), with a mean age of 64.8 years. After hospital discharge, 40 patients (36.7%) were medicated with rivaroxaban and 69 patients (63.3%) with acenocumarol. At 1 year of follow-up, patients under rivaroxaban and acenocumarol presented comparable major amputation rates (12.5 % vs. 10.1%, P = 0.756), bypass occlusion (22.5% vs. 24.6 %, P = 0.769), and mortality rate (10% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.756). Major bleeding occurred in 13.8% of patients. Patients with renal dysfunction had significantly higher bleeding risk with acenocumarol (45.5% vs. 0%, P = 0.028) compared to rivaroxaban, while patients with normal renal function presented similar bleeding rates with both anticoagulants (6.1% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.953).. Rivaroxaban has equivalent effectiveness to acenocumarol after infrainguinal bypass revascularization, with similar occlusion, major amputation, and mortality rates. Rivaroxaban has an improved safety profile in patients with moderate renal dysfunction due to a significantly lower incidence of major bleeding. In patients with normal renal function, rivaroxaban and acenocumarol present equivalent major bleeding rates.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amputation, Surgical; Anticoagulants; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Comorbidity; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Limb Salvage; Lower Extremity; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Polytetrafluoroethylene; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Veins

The International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis recommends avoiding direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in morbidly obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter.. A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted of patients older than 18 years, with BMI >40 kg/m. A total of 64 patients in each group were included in the study analysis. The incidence rate of ischemic stroke or TIA was 1.75%/year in the DOAC group compared with 2.07%/year in the warfarin group (rate ratio = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.23 to 3.14; P = 0.80). The incidence rate of major bleeding was 2.18%/year in the DOAC group, compared with 4.97%/year in the warfarin group (rate ratio = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.15 to 1.25; P = 0.11). Conclusion and Relevance: Apixaban and rivaroxaban may be considered as alternatives to warfarin for atrial fibrillation or flutter in morbidly obese patients. Dabigatran use in morbidly obese patients needs caution until further studies are conducted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin; Young Adult

Several comparative real-world effectiveness studies on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been conducted, but an overview of the available evidence remains to be developed, which could provide a better understanding of the value of DOACs relative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).. A systematic literature review was conducted on the available real-world evidence (RWE) of three DOACs (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban) compared with VKAs (e.g. warfarin), in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).This systematic literature review included RWE published up to December 2016. Studies with > 50 patients reporting on incident and prevalent NVAF cases were included. The following databases were searched: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Outcomes of interest included thromboembolic events, all-cause mortality, bleeding events, and nonpersistence. Of the 562 RWE DOACs articles retrieved, 49 presented results for rivaroxaban versus VKAs, 79 for dabigatran versus VKAs, and 18 for apixaban versus VKAs. Substantial heterogeneity was found across patient population, outcome definition, and follow-up period. Major bleeding, ischemic stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage were the most frequent outcomes analyzed.. Overall, the RWE studies were aligned with the Phase 3 trials. However, conflicting results were reported for several outcomes of interest.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Warfarin

This is one of the first head-to-head real-world evidence studies comparing stroke-related and bleed-related healthcare and resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients initiating oral anticoagulants.. Adult NVAF patients newly diagnosed and treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin between 10/01/2010 and 12/31/2014 were identified using MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. Per-patient-per-month stroke and bleed-related HCRU and costs were reported.. Dabigatran patients were matched 1:1 to 26,592 rivaroxaban and 33,024 warfarin patients (mean age=68 years). Compared to rivaroxaban, dabigatran patients had lower bleed-related inpatient and outpatient HCRU (0.004 vs. 0.005; 0.099 vs. 0.145) and significantly lower adjusted bleed-related costs ($116 vs. $172), all p <0.05. Compared to warfarin, dabigatran patients had significantly lower stroke-related outpatient visits (0.034 vs. 0.048, p<0.001) and higher bleed-related outpatient visits (0.101 vs. 0.091, p=0.045). Multivariate adjusted bleed-related costs were significantly lower for dabigatran patients than warfarin patients ($94 vs. $138, p<0.001).. The results suggest that dabigatran patients had lower bleed-related HCRU and costs than rivaroxaban patients, and lower outpatient stroke-related HCRU, higher bleed-related outpatient HCRU, and lower bleed-related costs than warfarin patients. It provides valuable stroke-related and bleed-related HCRU and costs information among commercially insured and Medicare patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Health Care Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medicare; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin

Researchers are extensively searching for modifiable risk factors including high-risk medications such as anticoagulation to avoid rehospitalisation. The influence of oral anticoagulant therapy on hospital readmission is not known. We investigated the impact of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on all cause 30-day hospital readmission retrospectively in an academic centre. We study the eligible cohort of 1781 discharges over 2-year period. Data on age, gender, diagnoses, 30-day hospital readmission, discharge medications and variables in the HOSPITAL score (Haemoglobin level at discharge, Oncology at discharge, Sodium level at discharge, Procedure during hospitalisation, Index admission, number of hospital Admissions, Length of stay) and LACE index (Length of stay, Acute/emergent admission, Charlson comorbidity index score, Emergency department visits in previous 6 months), which have higher predictability for readmission were extracted and matched for analysis. Warfarin was the most common anticoagulant prescribed at discharge (273 patients) with a readmission rate of 20% (p<0.01). DOACs were used by 94 patients at discharge with a readmission rate of 4% (p=0.219). Multivariate logistic regression showed an increased risk of readmission with warfarin therapy (OR 1.36, p=0.045). Logistic regression did not show DOACs to be a risk factor for hospital readmission. Our data suggests that warfarin therapy is a risk factor for all-cause 30-day hospital readmission. DOAC therapy is not found to be associated with a higher risk of hospital readmission. Warfarin anticoagulation may be an important target for interventions to reduce hospital readmissions.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Comorbidity; Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; Emergency Service, Hospital; Facilities and Services Utilization; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Illinois; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Readmission; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

In recent years, oral factor Xa inhibitors have become a research focus as anticoagulant drugs. Zifaxaban is the first oral FXa inhibitor to enter clinical trials in China. The aim of this study was to determine the inhibitory effect of zifaxaban on thrombosisthrough a model ofinferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis in rabbits. IVC thrombosis model was established by electrical injury and stenosis, and zifaxaban was administered (p.o.) for 5 consecutive days, then coagulation indicators and bleeding were observed. The results showed that zifaxaban had obvious inhibitory effects on FXa, and had a significant inhibitory effect on IVC thrombosis induced by electrical damage and stenosis. The effect of zifaxaban was similar to that of rivaroxaban, but the bleeding side-effects of zifaxaban were less severe than those of rivaroxaban. Zifaxaban could prolong the prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time of plasma similar to that of other oral FXa inhibitors. Zifaxaban had a significant inhibitory effect on FXa, but it had no obvious effect on other coagulation factors, major anticoagulant factors or fibrinolytic indices. Our results suggest that zifaxaban had specific inhibitory effects on FXa and inhibited IVC thrombosis in rabbits with its hemorrhagic effect was less than that of rivaroxaban. Zifaxaban is ecpected to be developed as a new drug for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis, providing more medication options for patients with such disease, more research is required to support it in the future.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; China; Constriction, Pathologic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rabbits; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Vena Cava, Inferior

To assess the association between rivaroxaban and warfarin and major bleeding risk in unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients.. Using US MarketScan claims from 1/2012-12/2016, we identified patients who had ≥1 primary hospitalization/emergency department visit diagnosis code for an unprovoked VTE, newly initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin within 30 days after the VTE and ≥12 months of insurance coverage prior to the VTE. Differences in baseline covariates were adjusted using inverse-probability-of-treatment weights based on propensity scores (residual absolute standardized differences <0.1 achieved for all covariates). Endpoints included any major, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, intracranial, and other bleeds. Patients were followed for up to 12 months or until endpoint occurrence, index oral anticoagulant discontinuation/switch, insurance disenrollment or end of follow-up.. We identified 10 489 rivaroxaban and 26 364 warfarin patients with an unprovoked VTE. Upon Cox regression, rivaroxaban reduced patients' hazard of major bleeding by 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8%-42%), gastrointestinal bleeding by 38% (95% CI = 14%-55%), and intracranial hemorrhage by 81% (95% CI = 41%-99%) vs warfarin. No subtype of major bleeding occurred statistically more often in rivaroxaban vs warfarin-treated patients.. Rivaroxaban was associated with a reduced risk of overall, gastrointestinal, and intracranial major bleeding vs warfarin in unprovoked VTE. No bleeding subtype was significantly more frequent in rivaroxaban patients.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Comorbidity; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Population Surveillance; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antidotes; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thrombophilia; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Oral anti-Xa inhibitors have demonstrated noninferiority to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and recurrent venous thromboembolism. They are associated with a decrease in major bleeding. In contrast with VKA, no coagulation monitoring is required. However, in clinical practice, determination of drug concentration is sometimes necessary.. The objective of this study was to evaluate a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) calibrated anti-Xa assay for the quantification of rivaroxaban and apixaban plasma concentration in emergency.. The anti-Xa plasma concentration of rivaroxaban and apixaban were measured in emergency in 210 patients using STA anti-Xa liquid assay. For each plasma concentration <150 ng/mL of rivaroxaban or apixaban, an anti-Xa assay calibrated with LMWH was performed.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Calibration; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

There is limited clinical experience with the use of coagulation concentrates to reverse the effect of direct oral anticoagulants. We assess the achievement of effective clinical hemostasis with the use of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in patients on apixaban or rivaroxaban presenting with major bleeding. A retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary referral medical center in the USA. We assess the achievement of clinical hemostasis using 4-factor PCC in patients on chronic apixaban or rivaroxaban therapy presenting with major bleeding. Clinical hemostasis was assessed by the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Scientific and Standardization Subcommittee criteria. A total of 29 patients are included in the study. The most common site of bleeding was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (72.4%), followed by gastrointestinal bleed (13.8%). Clinical hemostasis was achieved in 21 (72.4%) patients. Patients who did not achieve clinical hemostasis (27.6%) suffered from ICH, and all of them died during hospitalization except for two patients who were discharged with neurologic deterioration. One patient developed multiple brain infarctions after receiving 4-factor PCC. Sixteen patients (55.2%) were receiving concomitant medications that interact with apixaban and rivaroxaban and increase the risk of bleeding. Four-factor PCC appears to be effective in achieving clinical hemostasis in patients on apixaban or rivaroxaban presenting with major bleeding. It may be an alternative to patients who need anticoagulation reversal if the specific antidote, andexanet alfa, is not available.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alabama; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

In Europe, the approved rivaroxaban dose for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is 20 mg once daily (o.d.), with 15 mg o.d. recommended in patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) 15-49 mL/min. Non-recommended doses are prescribed in real-world practice. This analysis of the XANTUS study assessed outcomes associated with non-recommended dosing and patient characteristics that may have impacted dose choice.. Baseline characteristics and 1 year outcomes were compared in 4464/6784 patients with known CrCl, receiving recommended or non-recommended rivaroxaban doses; 3608 (80.8%) patients received recommended doses (mean CHADS2 score 1.9) and 856 (19.2%) non-recommended doses (mean CHADS2 score 2.5). Incidence rate (events/100 patient-years) for the composite of treatment-emergent adjudicated major bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism, and death was 7.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-9.8] and 4.8 (95% CI 4.1-5.7) with non-recommended and recommended doses, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 1.55, 95% CI 1.2-2.1; P = 0.004]. Incidence rates for the components of the composite were 3.7 and 2.6, 1.4 and 0.9, and 3.5 and 1.9, respectively. Adjustment for baseline characteristics showed similar rates of the composite outcome (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.45; P = 0.719). Multivariable analysis identified age, anaemia, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, CrCl, lower body weight, AF type, and vascular disease as predictors of non-recommended dosing.. Non-recommended rivaroxaban dosing was associated with less favourable outcomes, possibly due to baseline characteristics, in addition to renal function, that may also affect physicians' dosing decisions.. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01606995.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Canada; Clinical Decision-Making; Drug Dosage Calculations; Embolism; Europe; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Israel; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This study examined potential differences in bleeding between apixaban and rivaroxaban, the most commonly utilized direct oral anticoagulants at the Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center. Additionally, the analysis included a comparison between observed and literature-reported bleeding rates. This retrospective chart review examined 452 (39%) Veterans receiving rivaroxaban and 716 (61%) Veterans receiving apixaban. Bleeding rates were expressed per 100 patient-years and the overall rates were analyzed as the primary analysis. Secondary objectives included comparisons based on indication and severity, as well as comparisons to literature-reported bleed rates, time to bleeding event, and location of the bleed. The analysis did not detect any statistically significant differences between apixaban and rivaroxaban in terms of overall, (ARR 0.90% per 100 patient-years, 95% CI - 0.58 to 2.38%, p > 0.05) major, (ARR 0.22% per 100 patient-years, 95% CI - 0.74 to 1.17%, p > 0.05) or non-major clinically relevant (ARR 0.35% per 100 patient-years, 95% CI - 0.57 to 1.27%, p > 0.05) bleeding. Observed bleeding for both rivaroxaban and apixaban in the Veteran population exceeded the rates reported by the literature when used for atrial fibrillation (1.96% vs. 0.15%, p < 0.05; 1.08% vs. 0.16%, p < 0.05) but the opposite was seen for long term venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment (3.97% vs. 8.03%, p < 0.0001; 0.14% vs. 15.51%, p < 0.0001) or extended VTE prophylaxis (0.07% vs 5.98%, p < 0.0001; 0.07% vs 1.88%, p < 0.01). Results from this study suggest these agents impart similar levels of risk, but variations in bleeding risk between the Veteran population and the patients in the original clinical trials may exist.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Venous Thromboembolism; Veterans Health

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Insurance; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Recurrence; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Management of acute, major or life threatening bleeding in the presence of direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is unclear. In the absence of a specific antidote, or in situations where there is a need for adjunctive therapy, the ideal prothrombin complex concentrate and dose is unclear. The goal of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of our reduced dosing strategy with FEIBA in patients experiencing a DOAC-related bleeding event.. Retrospective analysis of patients treated with FEIBA for a DOAC-related bleeding event.. Academic medical center PATIENTS: Consecutive patients between May 2011 and April 2017 receiving FEIBA for a DOAC-related bleed INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS & MAIN RESULTS: Of the 64 patients included in this analysis, 38 patients received low dose FEIBA (mean 10.0 ± 3.6 units/kg) and 26 received moderate dose (mean 24.3 ± 2.1 units/kg) FEIBA; an additional dose was requested in 6 patients. Six dabigatran patients received idarucizumab. 30 day event rates included 5 thromboembolic events (8%) and 9 (14%) patients expired. Follow-up CT-imaging for ICH, endoscopy/colonoscopy, or interventional radiology exams did not reveal any clinically concerning active bleeding or hematoma expansion except in 2 ICH patients with slight expansion between imaging sessions.. Low (<20 units/kg) to moderate (20-30 units/kg) doses of FEIBA, with the option for a repeat dose, may be an effective management strategy for obtaining hemostasis in DOAC-related major bleeding events.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Coagulants; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

We used the US Department of Defense Military Health System database to compare the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) initiating dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban or apixaban.. Two cohorts of adults with NVAF, newly initiated on standard-dose DOAC, were identified based on clinical approval dates: July 2011-June 2016 for dabigatran (150 mg b.i.d.) or rivaroxaban (20 mg QD) and January 2013-June 2016 for dabigatran (150 mg b.i.d.) or apixaban (5 mg b.i.d.). Propensity score matching (1:1) identified two well-balanced cohorts (dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban n = 12 763 per treatment group; dabigatran vs. apixaban n = 4802 per treatment group). In both cohorts, baseline characteristics and follow-up duration were similar between treatment groups. Patients newly initiating dabigatran had significantly lower risk of major bleeding vs. rivaroxaban [2.08% vs. 2.53%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.97; P = 0.018], while stroke risk was similar (0.60% vs. 0.78%; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57-1.04; P = 0.084). The dabigatran vs. apixaban cohort analysis found no differences in risk of major bleeding (1.60% vs. 1.21%; HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.97-1.94; P = 0.070) or stroke (0.44% vs. 0.35%; HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.66-2.39; P = 0.489).. Among NVAF patients newly initiated on standard-dose DOAC therapy in this study, dabigatran was associated with significantly lower major bleeding risk vs. rivaroxaban, and no significant difference in stroke risk. For dabigatran vs. apixaban, the reduced sample size limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Military Medicine; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Department of Defense; Young Adult

To compare the occurrence of haemorrhages among the different oral anticoagulants (OAC) and to analyse factors that influence it.. Single-centre, observational, retrospective study. After studying the total population treated with OAC, patients who were treated with an OAC from July 2015 to December 2015 in the II Sector of the Zaragoza Hospital, who consulted the Emergency Department of the Miguel Servet University Hospital and presented a haemorrhagic event, were analysed. Patients' demographic data, clinical variables and data on the haemorrhagic event characteristics were gathered.. There were 9,452 patients treated with an OAC, 371 (3.9%) of which presented a haemorrhagic event. The frequency per OAC was; 4.1% (311) in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists, 3.8% (33) with rivaroxaban, 3.3% (19) with dabigatran and 2.1% (8) with apixaban. In the multivariate analysis, only the choice of anticoagulant and sex had a statistically significant influence of a lower risk of haemorrhage, in particular the dose of apixaban at 2.5mg and being female. (OR=0.1, CI=0.014-0.71 and OR=0.688, CI=0.55-0.85, respectively).. According to the results obtained, females and patients undergoing treatment with apixaban presented lower haemorrhagic risk, although there are doubts about whether this better safety profile is related to underdosing, which could influence its effectiveness. Therefore, these results should be analysed with caution and further studies are needed to confirm this data.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Spain

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the standard for thromboembolic risk management. In cases of major bleeding, trauma, or urgent surgery, accurate monitoring of DOAC activity is desirable; however, there is often no rapid, readily available test. We therefore explored the degree to which DOAC activity correlated with two coagulation assays: rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and a standard coagulation assay in bleeding patients. We conducted a retrospective review of patients who experienced bleeding while on DOAC therapy from 2015 to 2017 at a Level 1 trauma center. ROTEM (EXTEM-clotting time {CT} in seconds), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (in seconds), prothrombin time (PT) (in seconds), DOAC specific drug test (anti-Xa and Hemoclot in ng/mL), and relevant clinical parameters were recorded. Descriptive statistics (median, range) and Spearman correlation coefficients were estimated. Differences between correlations were tested using Williams' t test. Twelve cases were reviewed (13 separate bleeding episodes). Sixteen measurements of DOAC activity, EXTEM-CT, and PT were obtained. The correlations with rivaroxaban activity were 0.96 and 0.86 (p = 0.2062) for PT and EXTEM-CT, respectively. The correlations with apixaban activity were 0.63 and 0.56 (p = 0.7175) for PT and EXTEM-CT, respectively. Analyses were not conducted for dabigatran due to limited data. Although not statistically significant, PT appears to have a higher correlation with direct Xa inhibitor activity than EXTEM-CT. Further research with larger samples is necessary to clarify the differences between ROTEM and standard assays in detecting DOAC activity.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Predictive Value of Tests; Prothrombin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombelastography; Treatment Outcome

Peripheral artery disease affects 1.2% of the population globally and is associated with an increased risk of atherothrombotic cardiovascular events, major adverse limb events and mortality. The Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anti-coagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial demonstrated positive results of rivaroxaban plus aspirin therapy compared to aspirin therapy alone in those with peripheral artery disease or carotid artery disease. We sought to estimate the cost-effectiveness from the Australian healthcare system perspective.. A Markov model was developed to simulate the experiences of a hypothetical population of 1000 individuals with peripheral artery disease or carotid artery disease, profiled on the COMPASS trial, treated with rivaroxaban plus aspirin therapy versus aspirin therapy alone. With each annual cycle, individuals were at risk of having non-fatal cardiovascular disease events, major adverse limb events, or dying. Individuals were also at risk of non-fatal major bleeding. The model had a lifetime time horizon. Costs and utilities were sourced from the literature and discounted at 5.0% annually. Rivaroxaban plus aspirin therapy prevented 143 non-fatal cardiovascular disease events, 118 major adverse limb events and 10 deaths compared to aspirin therapy alone. Conversely, 156 additional major non-fatal bleeds were accrued. With an additional 256 quality-adjusted life years gained, at an additional cost of AUD$6,858,103, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was AUD$26,769 (discounted) per quality-adjusted life year gained, which is below Australia's arbitrary willingness to pay threshold of AUD$50,000.. In those with peripheral artery disease or carotid artery disease, rivaroxaban plus aspirin therapy is effective and cost-effective in the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular disease compared to aspirin therapy alone.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Australia; Carotid Artery Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The highest risk of adverse events for patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is during the early anticoagulation period. However, no established model exists for early clinical monitoring of patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The authors' aim was to evaluate the utility of a nurse-led pathway to minimize adverse events in acute VTE patients starting on rivaroxaban. The rivaroxaban VTE treatment pathway is a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with objectively confirmed VTE between July 2015 and May 2017. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients identified at major risk of adverse events (bleeding or recurrent VTE). Secondary outcomes were rates of interventions, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), recurrent VTE, and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Among 304 participants, 5% (

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Critical Pathways; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Physiologic; Nurse-Patient Relations; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

To analyze the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients attended in clinical practice.. Observational and prospective study of AF patients that started treatment with DOACs.. This was the first prospective study that analyzed the use of all DOACs in AF patients in Spain, showing a good profile in terms of safety and effectiveness in accordance with pivotal studies.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

To compare persistence and outcomes of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).. Given the unpredictable warfarin response and the costliness of NOACs, more research is needed to clarify which drug enjoys better persistence and outcomes, helping to provide personalised care for patients.. A prospective cohort study.. Chinese patients taking NOACs or warfarin from March 2016-April 2018 were followed up by telephone or outpatient visit at 3, 6 months and half a year thereafter. Anticoagulant persistence and outcomes including stroke and bleeding were collected. We used Cox regression to analyse data. This study was reported according to the STROBE guideline.. A total of 344 patients were enrolled; 146 patients received NOACs including dabigatran and rivaroxaban, and 198 patients received warfarin. Persistence with anticoagulants was low and dropped sharply at the third month. Patients on NOACs had worse persistence at 3, 6 and 12 months than those on warfarin. There was no difference in the incidence of ischaemic stroke and bleeding between groups, although ischaemic stroke and major bleeding occurred less frequently in the NOACs group. Paroxysmal AF, no heart failure and no stroke were predictors of NOACs non-persistence. Prior catheter ablation and no diabetes were associated with poor persistence of warfarin. The main reason for anticoagulant cessation was patient preference.. Chinese patients taking NOACs had lower persistence, similar rate of ischaemic stroke and bleeding compared with those on warfarin. Further inventions are needed to improve persistence in Chinese patients on NOACs.. Anticoagulation should highlight both persistence and outcomes emphasising personalised care of different drugs. Further interventions to improve persistence should be developed based on causes and risk factors and carried out in the third month of therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Preference; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Many strategies for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following hip and knee arthroplasty exist, with extensive controversy regarding the optimum strategy to minimize risk of VTE and bleeding complications. Data from the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Part II (oral) Examination case list database was analyzed to determine efficacy, complication rates, and prescribing patterns for different prophylactic strategies.. The American Board of Orthopedic Surgery case database was queried utilizing Current Procedural Terminology codes 27447 and 27130 for primary total knee and hip arthroplasty, respectively. Geographic region, patient age, gender, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis strategy, and complications were obtained. Less aggressive prophylaxis patterns were considered if only aspirin and/or sequential compression devises were utilized. More aggressive VTE prophylaxis patterns were considered if any of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin), warfarin, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, or other strategies was used.. In total, 22,072 cases of primary joint arthroplasty were analyzed from 2014 to 2016. The national rate of less aggressive VTE prophylaxis strategies was 45.4%, while more aggressive strategies were used in 54.6% of patients. Significant regional differences in prophylactic strategy patterns exist between the 6 regions. The predominant less aggressive prophylaxis pattern was aspirin with sequential compression devises at 84.8% with 14.8% receiving aspirin alone. Use of less aggressive prophylaxis strategy was significantly associated with patients having no complications (95.5% vs 93.0%). Use of more aggressive prophylaxis patterns was associated with higher likelihood of mild thrombotic (0.9% vs 0.2%), mild bleeding (1.3% vs 0.4%), moderate thrombotic (1.2% vs 0.4%), moderate bleeding (2.7% vs 2.1%), severe thrombotic (0.1% vs 0.0%), severe bleeding events (1.2% vs 0.9%), infections (1.9% vs 1.3%), and death within 90 days (0.7% vs 0.3%). Similar results were found in subgroup analysis of total hip and knee arthroplasty patients.. It was not possible to ascertain the individual rationale for use of more aggressive VTE prophylaxis strategies; however, more aggressive strategies were associated with higher rates of bleeding and thrombotic complications. Less aggressive strategies were not associated with a higher rate of thrombosis.. Therapeutic Level III.. All views expressed in the study are the sole views of the authors and do not represent the views of the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Aspirin; Databases, Factual; Enoxaparin; Female; Fondaparinux; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Orthopedic Procedures; Orthopedics; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; United States; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Clinical outcomes of the real-world Asian nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients treated with DOAC and the incremental bleeding risk of add-on antiplatelet therapy to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are still to be investigated. We conducted a single-center prospective observational registry of NVAF patients treated with DOACs: the DIRECT registry (UMIN000033283). All patients with NVAF (N = 2216) who were users of dabigatran (N = 648), rivaroxaban (N = 538), apixaban (N = 599), or edoxaban (N = 431) from June 2011 to November 2017 were enrolled (71.6 ± 10.8 years, 36.4% female, follow-up duration: 407.2 ± 388.3 days). No add-on antiplatelet agent was prescribed to 1,739 patients, while single and dual antiplatelet therapy (SAPT and DAPT) in combination with DOAC were prescribed to 411 and 66 patients, respectively. The primary safety endpoint was any bleeding which was defined as a composite of major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Patients treated with add-on antiplatelet agents irrespective of SAPT or DAPT had a higher any-bleeding risk than those without (hazard ratio: 1.42; 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.74, p = 0.001). Multivariate adjusted hazard of add-on antiplatelet therapy was not statistically significant (hazard ratio: 1.20; 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.53, p = 0.147). In conclusion, NVAF patients treated with antiplatelet agents and DOAC had a significantly higher bleeding risk than those using DOAC only. However, after adjustment of patients' background, add-on antiplatelet therapy to DOAC itself did not influence to a bleeding risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Health Services Misuse; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Septal Occluder Device; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of apixaban with those of rivaroxaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE).. Consecutive patients enrolled in the Mayo Thrombophilia Clinic Registry (between March 1, 2013, and January 30, 2018) and treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban for acute VTE were followed forward in time. The primary efficacy outcome was VTE recurrence. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding; the second safety outcome was clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB); and the third was a composite of major bleeding or CRNMB.. Within the group of 1696 patients with VTE enrolled, 600 (38%) were treated either with apixaban (n=302, 50%) or rivaroxaban (n=298, 50%) within the first 14 days of VTE diagnosis and who completed at least 3 months of therapy or had a study event. Recurrent VTE was diagnosed in 7 patients (2.3%) treated with apixaban and in 6 (2%) treated with rivaroxaban (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.4; 95% CI, 0.5-3.8). Major bleeding occurred in 11 patients (3.6%) receiving apixaban and in 9 patients (3.0%) receiving rivaroxaban (aHR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-3.2). Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was diagnosed in 7 patients (2.3%) receiving apixaban and in 20 (6.7%) receiving rivaroxaban (aHR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9). The rates of composite major bleeding or CRNMB were similar (aHR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3-1.2). Most study events occurred in patients with cancer.. In the setting of a standardized, guideline-directed, patient-oriented clinical practice, the efficacy and safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban for the treatment of acute VTE were comparable.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Although the efficacy and safety of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were shown in global and Japanese phase III clinical trials, safety and effectiveness data from unselected patients in everyday clinical practice are limited. The objective of the XAPASS (Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety & Effectiveness Study in Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in Japanese real-world clinical practice.. The XAPASS is a prospective, single-arm, real-world observational study mandated by the Japanese authority as post-marketing surveillance. In total, 11,308 patients with NVAF who began treatment with rivaroxaban were enrolled from April 2012 to June 2014, and 9578 patients were analyzed to examine the one-year outcomes.. Real-world outcomes of the XAPASS showed incidence rates of major bleeding and thromboembolic events, suggesting that rivaroxaban is safe and effective in Japanese daily clinical practice (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01582737).

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Rivaroxaban could be an attractive alternative to low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) but the safety and effectiveness remain unclear. We examined risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding associated with rivaroxaban treatment of cancer-associated VTE.. Through linkage of nationwide Danish registries, we identified all adults with cancer-associated VTE initiating treatment with rivaroxaban, 2012-2017. We estimated rates and absolute risk of the primary outcome of recurrent VTE and major bleeding; all-cause mortality was studied as a secondary outcome.. We identified 8901 patients with cancer-associated VTE of whom 476 (5.3%) redeemed a prescription for rivaroxaban within 30 days of VTE diagnosis (mean age 71.5 years, 41% females, 57% with pulmonary embolism). Median time from cancer diagnosis to rivaroxaban prescription was 31 days (interquartile range 12-73 days). Most frequent cancers were gastrointestinal (26.1%), genitourinary (23.3%), and hematological cancer (12.6%). Few had distant metastases (7.1%). At 6 months, recurrent VTE occurred in 6.1% (15.1 events per 100 person-years) with the highest absolute risks for genitourinary cancer (8.1%), gastrointestinal cancer (7.3%), and breast cancer (6.5%). Major bleeding occurred in 1.9% (5.3 events per 100 person-years), in particular, in genitourinary cancer (4.5%) and lung cancer (4.2%). Eighty deaths (17.8%) occurred during follow up.. In this clinical practice setting, rivaroxaban was rarely used for cancer-associated VTE. However, among those who received rivaroxaban, the treatment appeared safe and effective with rates comparable to previous studies of selected populations.

Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are safe and efficacious when compared to warfarin for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, bleeding is a major side effect of anticoagulant therapy in VTE patients. Discontinuation of the DOACs associated to adverse events such as bleeding. The HAS-BLED score predicts warfarin-associated hemorrhage. However, little is known about risk factors for DOAC-associated minor bleeding in VTE patients. We aimed to identify risk factors for minor bleeding in VTE patients that were treated with edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. We retrospectively evaluated the data of 212 VTE patients who received treatment with a DOAC. The study endpoint was defined as the occurrence of minor bleeding. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors that were significantly associated with minor bleeding. A total of 36 (17.0%) patients experienced minor bleeding, with rates of 15.7%, 0%, and 21.3% for edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, bleeding history or predisposition [odds ratio (OR) 6.083, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.131-17.364, p=0.001] and cancer (OR 6.397, 95% CI 2.858-14.317, p<0.001) were significantly associated with minor bleeding. Bleeding history or predisposition and cancer were the most important risk factors for DOAC-induced minor bleeding in VTE patients in this study. To continue anticoagulant therapy of the DOACs, further management systems by minor bleeding risk factors for patients with VTE will be required.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Background Liver cirrhotic patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have been excluded from randomized clinical studies regarding oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention. Whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants ( NOAC s) are superior to warfarin for these patients remains unclear. Methods and Results This nationwide retrospective cohort study, with data collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, enrolled 2428 liver cirrhotic patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation taking apixaban (n=171), dabigatran (n=535), rivaroxaban (n=732), or warfarin (n=990) from June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. We used propensity score-based stabilized weights to balance covariates across study groups. Patients were followed until the occurrence of an event or the end date of study. The NOAC group (n=1438) showed risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and intracranial hemorrhage comparable to that of the warfarin group (n=990) after adjustment. The NOAC group showed significantly lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.79]; P=0.0030) and all major bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.74]; P=0.0003) compared with warfarin group. Overall, 90% (n=1290) of patients were taking a low-dose NOAC (apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 10-15 mg daily, or dabigatran 110 mg twice daily). The subgroup analysis indicated that both dabigatran and rivaroxaban showed lower risk of all major bleeding than warfarin. The advantage of lower gastrointestinal and all major bleeding with NOACs over warfarin is contributed by those subgroups with either nonalcoholic or nonadvanced liver cirrhosis. Conclusions NOACs have a risk of thromboembolism comparable to that of warfarin and a lower risk of major bleeding among liver cirrhotic Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Consequently, thromboprophylaxis with low-dose NOAC s may be considered for such patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Taiwan; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are known to have a high risk of stroke and bleeding. We investigated the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in octogenarian patients with non-valvular AF compared with warfarin.. A total of 687 octogenarian patients with AF who were administered NOACs (n = 403) or warfarin (n = 284) for stroke prevention between 2012 and 2016 were included. Thromboembolic (TE) events (stroke or systemic embolism), major bleeding events, and all-cause death were analyzed.. The NOACs group (age 83.4±3.2 years, women 52.4%, CHA2DS2-VASc score 5.0±1.8) comprised 141 dabigatran, 158 rivaroxaban, and 104 apixaban users. Most patients from the NOACs group had been prescribed a reduced dose of medication (85.6%). During 14±18 months of follow-up periods, there were 19 TE events and 18 major bleeding events. Patients with NOAC showed a lower risk of TE (1.84 vs. 2.71 per 100 person-years, hazard ration [HR] 0.134, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.038-0.479, P = 0.002), major bleeding (1.48 vs. 2.72 per 100 person-years, HR 0.110, 95% CI 0.024-0.493, P = 0.001), and all-cause death (2.57 vs. 3.50 per 100 person-years, HR 0.298, 95% CI 0.108-0.824, P = 0.020).. In octogenarian Asian patients with AF, NOACs might be associated with lower risks of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and all-cause death than warfarin. Although most patients had received reduced doses, on-label use of NOACs was effective and safe.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, has demonstrated non-inferiority to warfarin for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment in clinical trials. This study aimed to analyze the direct medical costs for VTE management with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in Hong Kong Chinese patients.. In this retrospective observational study, VTE patients admitted to the Princess Margaret Hospital from March 2012 to February 2017 who were initiated and discharged with either rivaroxaban or warfarin were included. Patient demographic and clinical data, and healthcare resource utilization for VTE management were collected for the VTE index admission and 1-year post-discharge period.. A total of 181 patients (90 in the rivaroxaban group; 91 in the warfarin group) were included. The mean (± SD) length of stay (LOS) was 4.8 ± 2.7 days and 8.0 ± 3.0 days in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups, respectively (p > 0.001). The total cost for VTE index admission in the rivaroxaban group was significantly lower than that of the warfarin group (USD 5473 ± 1914 versus USD 3457 ± 1796; p < 0.001) (USD 1 = HKD 7.8). Recurrent VTE and bleeding rates in 1-year post-discharge period were not significantly different between the two groups. The direct total cost of the rivaroxaban group (USD 1271 ± 767) was significantly lower than that of the warfarin group (USD 1739 ± 1045) in 1-year post-discharge period (p < 0.001).. Total direct cost and LOS for VTE admission and total cost in 1-year post-discharge period were significantly lower in patients initiated and discharged with rivaroxaban than those of warfarin.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hong Kong; Hospital Costs; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

 This study assessed changes in anticoagulation therapy over time in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)..  Analyses were performed on a claims-based dataset of 4 million health-insured individuals. The study population consisted of patients newly initiating a non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for AF between 2013 and 2016. The study outcomes consisted of the proportion of patients who had (1) discontinued OAC treatment, (2) switched from VKA to NOAC, (3) switched from NOAC to VKA or (4) switched from one NOAC to another. Predictors of discontinuation or switching of OAC treatment were determined by Cox proportional hazards regression models with time-independent and time-dependent covariates..  The study population comprised 51,606 AF patients initiating VKA (.  Overall discontinuation rates of VKA and NOACs are comparable over the first year of therapy, while switching from VKA to NOAC was more common than from NOAC to VKA. The majority of treatment changes were associated with clinical events.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug Substitution; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Germany; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Withholding Treatment

Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases with age; > 80% of US adults with AF are aged ≥ 65 years. Compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), net clinical outcome (NCO), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) Medicare patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) VS warfarin. NVAF patients aged ≥ 65 years who initiated DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) or warfarin were selected from 01JAN2013-31DEC2015 in CMS Medicare data. Propensity score matching was used to balance DOAC and warfarin cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the risk of stroke/SE, MB, NCO, and MACE. 37,525 apixaban-warfarin, 18,131 dabigatran-warfarin, and 55,359 rivaroxaban-warfarin pairs were included. Compared to warfarin, apixaban (HR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.59-0.81) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.73-0.91) had lower risk of stroke/SE, and dabigatran (HR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.72-1.07) had similar risk of stroke/SE. Apixaban (MB: HR: 0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.67; NCO: HR: 0.64; 95% CI 0.60-0.69) and dabigatran (MB: HR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.71-0.89; NCO: HR: 0.84; 95% CI 0.76-0.93) had lower risk of MB and NCO, and rivaroxaban had higher risk of MB (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 1.02-1.14) and similar risk of NCO (HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.99-1.09). Compared to warfarin, apixaban had a lower risk for stroke/SE, MB, and NCO; dabigatran had a lower risk of MB and NCO; and rivaroxaban had a lower risk of stroke/SE but higher risk of MB. All DOACs had lower risk of MACE compared to warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of thromboelastometry for assessing rivaroxaban concentrations. The accuracy of thromboelastometry was compared with the high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method, which is the gold standard for drug plasma monitoring (the reference standard). Forty-six clinically stable patients were treated with 10, 15, or 20 mg of rivaroxaban once daily (OD group) or 15 mg twice a day (BID group) (no particular indication for treatment). Patient samples were collected 2 h after the use of the medication (peak) and 2 h before the next dose (trough). The rivaroxaban plasma concentrations were determined via HPLC-MS/MS, and thromboelastometry was performed using a ROTEM® delta analyzer. There were significant prolongations in clotting time (CT) for the 10, 15, and 20 mg of rivaroxaban treatments in the OD groups. In the 15 mg BID group, the responses at the peak and trough times were similar. At the peak times, there was a positive correlation between the plasma concentration of rivaroxaban and CT (Spearman correlation rho=0.788, P<0.001) and clot formation time (rho=0.784, P<0.001), and a negative correlation for alpha angle (rho=-0.771, P<0.001), amplitude after 5 min (rho=-0.763, P<0.001), and amplitude after 10 min (rho=-0.680, P<0.001). The CT presented higher specificity and sensitivity using the cut-off determined by the receiver characteristics curve. ROTEM has potential as screening tool to measure possible bleeding risk associated with rivaroxaban plasma levels.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Coagulation Tests; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Data Accuracy; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Thrombelastography

Cancer-associated thromboembolic complications in malignant neoplasms are commonly encountered. They deteriorate the course of the underlying disease and are frequent causes of death. The oncological patient is at high risk of not only thrombosis but haemorrhage during anticoagulant therapy. Recent randomized clinical trials have positively appreciated the possibilities of direct oral anticoagulants in treatment and prevention of thromboses in oncological patients. Analysing subgroups in these studies demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants during long-term administration were at least as effective and safe as vitamin K antagonists. The most significant by the number of cases, duration of therapy, and methodology of analysis are the reports regarding rivaroxaban - an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. There are also findings obtained in a separate randomized study, confirming efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in treatment of patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolic complications as compared with therapy with low-molecular-weight heparins. Namely these results formed the basis for the guidelines of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SSC ISTH), according to which rivaroxaban may be regarded as an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparins in certain clinical situations.. Онкоассоциированные венозные тромбоэмболические осложнения при злокачественных новообразованиях встречаются часто, ухудшают течение основной патологии и являются распространенной причиной смерти. Онкологический больной обладает не только высоким риском тромбообразования, но и кровотечений в ходе антикоагулянтной терапии. Последние рандомизированные клинические испытания положительно оценивают возможности прямых оральных антикоагулянтов в лечении и профилактике тромбозов у онкологических пациентов. Анализ подгрупп в этих исследованиях указывает, что прямые оральные антикоагулянты при долговременном использовании как минимум так же эффективны и безопасны, как антагонисты витамина К. Наиболее значим по количеству наблюдений, срокам терапии и методологии анализа материал, относящийся к ривароксабану – прямому пероральному ингибитору Ха фактора. Также есть данные, полученные в отдельном рандомизированном исследовании, подтверждающие эффективность и безопасность терапии ривароксабаном пациентов с онкоассоциированными венозными тромбоэмболическими осложнениями по сравнению с терапией низкомолекулярными гепаринами. Именно эти результаты легли в основу рекомендаций международного общества тромбоза и гемостаза (SSC ISTH), в соответствии с которыми ривароксабан может рассматриваться как альтернатива низкомолекулярным гепаринам в определенных клинических ситуациях.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism

This study evaluated the trends in anticoagulation use after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin.. This retrospective database analysis used healthcare claims from the Truven Health MarketScan database (2010-2015). Patients undergoing elective THA were followed for use of anticoagulants after surgery. Logistic regression models were used to compare differences in deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and adverse events, within 90 days after THA, among warfarin and rivaroxaban users. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to account for selection bias.. There were 12,876 users of warfarin and 10,892 users of rivaroxaban in commercially insured (CI) patients, and 7416 warfarin users and 4739 rivaroxaban users in Medicare supplement (MS) patients. Warfarin use decreased over time in both insurance cohorts, whereas rivaroxaban use increased from 2011 to 2015. Warfarin users were significantly more likely to experience both DVT (CI: odds ratio [OR] 2.63, 95% confidence interval 1.97-3.50; MS: OR 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.38-2.29) and PE (CI: OR 2.60, 95% confidence interval 2.04-3.31; MS: OR 2.09, 95% confidence interval 1.66-2.65). There was no significant difference in rates of bleeding between the 2 agents, but warfarin users had higher odds of periprosthetic joint infection in both cohorts (CI: OR 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.16-2.13; MS: OR 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.14-2.81).. There has been an increase in prophylaxis with rivaroxaban, and a decrease in warfarin use after elective THA over 4 years. Warfarin users were more likely to experience DVT and PE than rivaroxaban, and bleeding risks were similar.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Databases, Factual; Female; Health Services; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medicare; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Pulmonary Embolism; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; United States; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Databases, Factual; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Essentials Currently, DOACs are given at fixed doses and do not require laboratory monitoring. Direct oral anticoagulant-specific measurements were performed at trough and peak. Patients who developed bleeding events showed higher DOAC plasma levels at peak. This study suggests the need of a more accurate DOAC dose assessment.. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are administered at fixed dose. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between DOAC C-trough or C-peak plasma levels and bleeding complications in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. Five hundred sixty five consecutive naive NVAF patients were enrolled. The DOAC measurements at C-trough and at C-peak (available in 411 patients) were performed at steady state, within the first month of treatment. Major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and minor bleeding (MinB), occurring during 1 year of follow-up after blood sampling, were recorded. For each DOAC, interval of C-trough and C-peak levels was subdivided into four equal classes and results were attributed to these classes; the median values of results were also calculated.. Two hundred eight patients were on apixaban, 185 on dabigatran, and 172 on rivaroxaban. For 1-[qqqdeletezzz] year follow up for all patients, we observed: 19 MB (3.36%), 6 CRNMB (1.06%), and 47 MinB (8.31%). The prevalence of bleeding patients with anticoagulant levels in the upper classes of C-peak activity (II + III + IV) was higher than that in the lowest class. Normalized results of C-peak levels were higher in patients with bleeding than in those without bleeding.. Bleeding complications during DOAC treatment were more frequent among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with higher C-peak anticoagulant levels. In addition to a previous study that showed an increased risk of thrombotic complications in the patients with low C-trough levels, this study seems to indicate that patients with NVAF on DOACs would need a more accurate definition of their optimal therapeutic window.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

It is unclear whether the two once-daily dosing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), edoxaban and rivaroxaban, have similar effectiveness and safety in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban and rivaroxaban in a Korean population with non-valvular AF. Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database from January 2014 to December 2016, we compared the risk of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), hospitalization for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, hospitalization for major bleeding, all-cause death, and composite outcome in a 3:1 propensity score matched cohort in patients with AF who were naïve to rivaroxaban (n = 12,369) and edoxaban (n = 4,123). Hazard ratios for the six clinical outcomes were analyzed using Cox regression analysis with rivaroxaban as the reference. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups (median age, 71 years; median CHA

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Disease Susceptibility; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Flow Cytometry; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Infant; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Outcome Assessment; Population Surveillance; Pyridines; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing hemodialysis were excluded from phase III randomized trials of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing hemodialysis in routine practice.. Using MarketScan data from January 2012 to December 2017, we identified patients on oral anticoagulant (OAC) with naïve nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing hemodialysis and with ≥12 months of insurance coverage before OAC initiation. Differences in baseline covariates between the rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts were adjusted using inverse probability-of-treatment weights based on propensity scores calculated using generalized boosted models and 10,000 regression trees (absolute standardized differences <0.1 achieved for all covariates after adjustment). Patients were followed until a stroke/systemic embolism or major bleeding event, OAC discontinuation/switch, insurance disenrollment, or end of data availability. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the OAC cohorts were calculated using Cox regression.. We identified 1896 rivaroxaban (38.7% received a dose <20 mg/d) and 4848 warfarin users. Eighty-eight percent of included patients had stage 5 chronic kidney disease or were undergoing hemodialysis. Rivaroxaban did not significantly reduce stroke or systemic embolism (HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.27-1.10) or ischemic stroke (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.30-1.50) alone, but it was associated with a significant 32% (95% CI = 1-53%) reduction in major bleeding risk compared with warfarin.. Among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing hemodialysis, rivaroxaban appears associated with significantly less major bleeding compared to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Databases, Factual; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; United States; Warfarin; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety of low-strength and high-strength direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with warfarin in the Australian Veteran population.. Sequential cohort study using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching. Initiators of high-strength (apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg) and low-strength DOACS (apixaban 2.5 mg, dabigatran 110 mg, rivaroxaban 15 mg) were compared with warfarin initiators.. Australian Government Department of Veterans' Affairs claims database.. 4836 patients who initiated oral anticoagulants (45.8%, 26.0% and 28.2% on low-strength, high-strength DOACs and warfarin, respectively) between August 2013 and March 2015. Mean age was 85, 75 and 83 years for low-strength, high-strength DOACs and warfarin initiators, respectively.. One-year risk of hospitalisation for ischaemic stroke, any bleeding event or haemorrhagic stroke. Secondary outcomes were 1-year risk of hospitalisation for myocardial infarction and death.. Using the IPTW method, no difference in risk of ischaemic stroke or bleeding was found with low-strength DOACs compared with warfarin. As a class, no increased risk of myocardial infarction was found for low-strength DOACs, however, risk was elevated for apixaban (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.13). For high-strength DOACs, no difference was found for ischaemic stroke compared with warfarin, however, there was a significant reduction in risk of bleeding events (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.89) and death (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.58). Propensity score matching showed no difference in risk of ischaemic stroke or bleeding.. We found that in the practice setting both DOAC formulations were similar to warfarin with regard to effectiveness and had no increased risk of bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Australia; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Veterans; Warfarin

Andexanet alfa, a recombinant modified human "decoy" factor Xa (FXa) protein, is the first and only available antidote approved by the Food and Drug Administration to manage life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding associated with the anti-Xa agents. It binds to direct and indirect anti-Xa oral anticoagulants with high specificity to reverse their inhibitory effects and restore the activity of FXa. Andexanet alfa is administered via two different dosing regimens, standard and high dose, based on the specific FXa inhibitor, dose, and time since the patient's last dose of FXa inhibitor. The approval for andexanet alfa is supported by data from two phase 3 studies (ANNEXA-A, ANNEXA-R) and preliminary data from the phase 3b/4 ANNEXA-4 trial. The first study found that andexanet alfa rapidly reduced anti-Xa activity by 92%-94% in healthy volunteers taking apixaban or rivaroxaban. The ANNEXA-4 study found that the median anti-Xa activity decreased by 89%-93% in patients with major bleeding taking apixaban or rivaroxaban. However, thrombotic events occurred in 12 of 67 patients (18%) during the 30-day follow-up in ANNEXA-4. Additionally, only 40% of patients had restarted anticoagulation and, in this group, the rate of thrombotic events was 12%. Four patients had a thrombotic event within 3 days after andexanet alfa treatment. The wholesale acquisition cost of the standard dose regimen is $24,750, and the high-dose regimen is $49,500. The estimated annual drug budget of treating 10-100 patients ranges from $248K to $495M. Effective October 1, 2018, Medicare will provide an add-on payment for andexanet alfa of up to $14,063 per qualifying case to Inpatient Prospective Payment System-participating acute care hospitals. In this formulary review for a health system's pharmacy and therapeutics committee, andexanet alfa clinical trials and medication package insert were summarized and, after consulting with clinical experts from our institutions, practical recommendations for use were generated to ensure appropriate and safe use of this agent.

Topics: Antidotes; Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug and Narcotic Control; Drug Costs; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Medication Therapy Management; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; United States

Rivaroxaban has numerous advantages over traditional anticoagulation therapy. Fixed doses can be administered without requiring routine monitoring of coagulation, and anticoagulation efficacy is more predictable. Safety, including fewer drug interactions, and reduced bleeding, is also improved with rivaroxaban based on current recommendations. The goal of this report was to explore if low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily was effective in an elderly patient who developed minor bleeding when treated with rivaroxaban (10 mg twice daily) for a pulmonary embolism.. We present an 88-year-old female with dyspnea and fatigue, which became increasingly worse over a month in the absence of medication. Her weight was 64 kg. Routine coagulation assays and renal function were normal at time of admission.. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were confirmed by venous compression ultrasonography and computed tomography pulmonary angiography.. Oral rivaroxaban 10 mg twice daily was administered, but the patient developed hemoptysis and gum bleeding 5 days later. The dose of rivaroxaban was reduced to 10 mg once daily, and bleeding gradually disappeared after 3 days.. At follow-up 90 days after treatment, the patient reported no discomfort. Venous compression ultrasonography and computed tomography pulmonary angiography showed normal results; therefore, treatment was terminated.. Elderly patients exhibit variable tolerance of anticoagulants, warranting careful consideration of the risk of bleeding. Low-dose rivaroxaban was an effective treatment for pulmonary embolism in the elderly patient presented here.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aftercare; Aged, 80 and over; Computed Tomography Angiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography; Venous Thrombosis

Whether four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are superior to warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) remains unclear.. This nationwide retrospective cohort study was based on data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, covering patients with NVAF taking edoxaban (n = 4,577), apixaban (n = 9,952), rivaroxaban (n = 33,022), dabigatran (n = 22,371), and warfarin (n = 19,761). Propensity score weighting was used to balance covariates across study groups. Patients were followed up until occurrence of study outcomes or end date of study.. In the largest real-world practice study among Asian patients with NVAF, four DOACs were associated with a comparable or lower risk of thromboembolism, and a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin. There was consistency even among high-risk subgroups and whether standard-or low-dose regimens were compared.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Taiwan; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Older adult patients are underrepresented in clinical trials comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin. This subgroup analysis of the ARISTOPHANES study used multiple data sources to compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among very old patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) prescribed NOACs or warfarin.. Retrospective observational study.. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and three US commercial claims databases.. A total of 88 582 very old (aged ≥80 y) NVAF patients newly initiating apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from January 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015.. In each database, six 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) cohorts were created for each drug comparison. Patient cohorts were pooled from all four databases after PSM. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of stroke/SE and MB.. The patients in the six matched cohorts had a mean follow-up time of 7 to 9 months. Compared with warfarin, apixaban (HR = .58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .49-.69), dabigatran (HR = .77; 95% CI = .60-.99), and rivaroxaban (HR = .74; 95% CI = .65-.85) were associated with lower risks of stroke/SE. For MB, apixaban (HR = .60; 95% CI = .54-.67) was associated with a lower risk; dabigatran (HR = .92; 95% CI = .78-1.07) was associated with a similar risk, and rivaroxaban (HR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.07-1.24) was associated with a higher risk compared with warfarin. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE and MB compared with dabigatran (stroke/SE: HR = .65; 95% CI = .47-.89; MB: HR = .60; 95% CI = .49-.73) and rivaroxaban (stroke/SE: HR = .72; 95% CI = .59-.86; MB: HR = .50; 95% CI = .45-.55). Dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of MB (HR = .77; 95% CI = .67-.90) compared with rivaroxaban.. Among very old NVAF patients, NOACs were associated with lower rates of stroke/SE and varying rates of MB compared with warfarin. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1662-1671, 2019.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medicare; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate

Because studies of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism and non-valvular atrial fibrillation have had minimal representation of morbidly obese patients (ie, body-mass index [BMI] ≥40 kg/m. We did a single-centre, retrospective analysis of chart data for all adult patients aged at least 18 years at Montefiore Medical Center (Bronx, NY, USA) with a BMI of at least 40 kg/m. We obtained data for 795 patients: 150 prescribed apixaban, 326 rivaroxaban, and 319 warfarin. In 366 patients prescribed an anticoagulant for venous thromboembolism, the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism was similar between the apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin cohorts (1/47 [2·1%, 95% CI 0·0-6·3], 3/152 [2·0%, 0·0-4·2], and 2/167 [1·2%, 0·0-2·9], respectively; p=0·74). Incidence of major bleeding in this patient group was also similar between the treatment cohorts (1/47 patients on apixaban [2·1%, 95% CI 0·0-6·3], 2/152 on rivaroxaban [1·3%, 0·0-3·1], and 4/167 on warfarin [2·4%, 0·1-4·7]; p=0·77). In 429 patients prescribed an anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation, incidence of stroke was similar between the treatment cohorts (1/103 patients on apixaban [1·0%, 95% CI 0·0-2·9], 4/174 on rivaroxaban [2·3%, 0·1-4·5], and 2/152 on warfarin [1·3%, 0·0-3·1], p=0·71). In this patient group, major bleeding occurred in 3/103 patients on apixaban (2·9%, 95% CI 0·0-6·2), 5/174 on rivaroxaban (2·9%, 0·4-5·4), and 12/152 on warfarin (7·9%, 3·6-12·2); p=0·063. Time-to-event analyses showed that risk of all outcomes in patients with venous thromboembolism, and stroke and composite bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation, were similar between the anticoagulant cohorts.. Our retrospective study provides further evidence of similar efficacy and safety between the direct oral anticoagulants apixaban and rivaroxaban, and warfarin in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. These data, if confirmed in prospective studies, might enable patients with a BMI of at least 40 kg/m. None.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Mass Index; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity, Morbid; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Routine laboratory monitoring of rivaroxaban and dose adjustment relating to exposure is currently not recommended. However, in certain clinical situations, assessment of rivaroxaban levels is desirable.. To examine inter- and intra-subject plasma rivaroxaban variability in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and to correlate these results to clinical outcomes.. We included 60 patients with AF treated with rivaroxaban: half on 20 mg daily (R20) and half on 15 mg daily (R15). Three trough and peak blood samples were collected with an interval of 6-8 weeks apart. Plasma rivaroxaban concentration was measured directly by liquid chromatography-tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and indirectly by anti-Xa for rivaroxaban, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT).. There is a pronounced inter-, but not intra-individual variability in the rivaroxaban trough levels in patients with AF. Assessment of trough rivaroxaban concentration with LC-MS/MS or anti-Xa, but not with APTT or PT, may help to identify patients at increased risk of bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Biological Variation, Individual; Biological Variation, Population; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the standard treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active cancer. However, use of factor Xa inhibitors, such as rivaroxaban, is increasing on the basis of limited clinical evidence. The present single-center study compared the incidence of bleeding and other treatment outcomes in gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary cancer (GI tract cancer) patients administered rivaroxaban or LMWH for the treatment of VTE.. Retrospective data from 281 GI tract cancer patients who were treated for VTE with rivaroxaban (n = 78) or LMWH (n = 203) between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016, were analyzed. Primary end-point was the incidence of major and clinically relevant bleeding. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of recurrent VTE and mortality.. Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 19 patients (24.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and 31 (15.3%) in the LMWH group (. Compared to LMWH, rivaroxaban was associated with a higher incidence of clinically relevant bleeding in GI tract cancer patients presenting with VTE.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Biliary Tract; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Tract; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stomach Neoplasms; Venous Thromboembolism

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are the drug of choice for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), however non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) seem to be a reasonable alternative. We investigated the safety and efficacy of NOAC versus LMWH in patients with a history of CAT.. In a prospective cohort study 128 consecutive patients with active cancer who experienced CAT were enrolled following LMWH treatment for ≥3 months. Symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding and death were recorded during follow-up.. 65 (50.8%) patients were switched to NOAC and 63 (49.2%) continued with LMWH. During a median follow-up of 17 (interquartile range, 15-21) months, recurrent VTE was observed in 6 (9.2%) patients on NOAC and in 12 (19.0%) on LMWH (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-1.16). The rate of major bleeding was 9.2% and 4.8%, respectively (HR 2.00, 95% CI 0.50-8.00). The median time to bleeding was shorter in patients on NOAC (3 [2.25-5.5] months) versus on LMWH (9 [6.5-13.0] months). The mortality rates were similar in both groups (15.4% versus 15.9%, respectively, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.32-1.84).. In patients following CAT, extended treatment with NOAC, compared with LMWH, appears to be associated with similar effectiveness and safety.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Drug Administration Schedule; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Clinical trials have demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at least non-inferior to warfarin in reducing the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), but the comparative risk of major bleeding varies between DOACs and warfarin. Using US Department of Defense (DOD) data, this study compared the risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding for DOACs relative to warfarin.. Adult patients with ≥1 pharmacy claim for apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from 01 Jan 2013-30 Sep 2015 were selected. Patients were required to have ≥1 medical claim for atrial fibrillation during the 12-month baseline period. Patients with a warfarin or DOAC claim during the 12-month baseline period were excluded. Each DOAC cohort was matched to the warfarin cohort using propensity score matching (PSM). Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to evaluate the risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding of each DOAC vs warfarin.. Of 41,001 identified patients, there were 3691 dabigatran-warfarin, 8226 rivaroxaban-warfarin, and 7607 apixaban-warfarin matched patient pairs. Apixaban was the only DOAC found to be associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39, 0.77; p < 0.001) and major bleeding (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.80; p < 0.001) compared to warfarin. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban initiation were associated with similar risk of stroke/SE (dabigatran: HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.43, 1.07; p = 0.096; rivaroxaban: HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.09; p = 0.187) and major bleeding (dabigatran: HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.40; p = 0.730; rivaroxaban: HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.27; p = 0.423) compared to warfarin.. Among NVAF patients in the US DOD population, apixaban was associated with significantly lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding compared to warfarin. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with similar risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding compared to warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Department of Defense; Warfarin; Young Adult

Background and Purpose- Limited evidence exists on the effectiveness and safety of warfarin and all 4 available non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) from current clinical practice in the Asian population with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of warfarin and 4 NOACs. Methods- We studied a retrospective nonrandomized observational cohort of oral anticoagulant naïve nonvalvular patients with atrial fibrillation treated with warfarin or NOACs (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, or edoxaban) from January 2015 to December 2017, based on the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. For the comparisons, warfarin to 4 NOACs and NOAC to NOAC comparison cohorts were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting. Ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, and a composite clinical outcome were evaluated. Results- A total of 116 804 patients were included (25 420 with warfarin, 35 965 with rivaroxaban, 17 745 with dabigatran, 22 177 with apixaban, and 15 496 with edoxaban). Compared with warfarin, all NOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, and composite outcome. Apixaban and edoxaban showed a lower rate of ischemic stroke compared with rivaroxaban and dabigatran. Apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban had a lower rate of gastrointestinal bleeding and major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban. The composite clinical outcome was nonsignificantly different for apixaban versus edoxaban. Conclusions- In this large contemporary nonrandomized Asian cohort, all 4 NOACs were associated with lower rates of ischemic stroke and major bleeding compared with warfarin. Differences in clinical outcomes between NOACs may give useful guidance for physicians to choose drugs to fit their particular patient clinical profile.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Republic of Korea; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) trial found clinical benefit of low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin, but at the expense of increased bleeding risk in patients with stable vascular disease.. This study evaluated the balance of ischemic and bleeding risks according to the presence of ≥1 enrichment criteria in "COMPASS-eligible" patients.. Key COMPASS selection criteria were applied to identify a COMPASS-eligible population (n = 16,875) from the REACH (REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health) Registry of stable atherothrombotic patients. Ischemic outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Bleeding outcome was serious bleeding (hemorrhagic stroke, hospitalization for bleeding, transfusion).. Patients were categorized according to the enrichment criteria: age >65 years (81.5%), diabetes (41.0%), moderate renal failure (40.2%), peripheral artery disease (33.7%), current smoker (13.8%), heart failure (13.3%), ischemic stroke (11.1%), and asymptomatic carotid stenosis (8.7%). Each criterion was associated with a consistent increase in ischemic and bleeding events, but no individual subgroup derived a more favorable trade-off. Patients with multiple criteria had a dramatic increase in ischemic risk (7.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.6% to 8.7%], 12.5% [95% CI: 11.1% to 14.1%], 16.6% [95% CI: 14.7% to 18.6%], and 21.8% [95% CI: 19.9% to 23.9%] with 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 enrichment criteria, respectively), but a more modest absolute increase in bleeding risk (1.5% [95% CI: 0.9% to 2.1%], 1.8% [95% CI: 1.3% to 2.2%], 2.0% [95% CI: 1.5% to 2.6%], 3.2% [95% CI: 2.6% to 3.9%]).. In a population of stable vascular patients at high risk of atherothrombotic events, the subset with multiple enrichment criteria had a greater absolute increase in ischemic than in bleeding risk and may be good candidates for low-dose rivaroxaban in addition to aspirin.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Male; Myocardial Ischemia; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Antidotes; Blood Coagulation Factors; Blood Component Transfusion; Blood Loss, Surgical; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Drug Administration Schedule; Emergencies; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intraoperative Care; Premedication; Preoperative Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Wounds and Injuries

Despite considerable progress in the field of heart failure about drugs and device therapy, the mortality rate of patients with heart failure remains high. Studies have shown that thromboembolism and stroke are associated with high mortality in patients with heart failure. Although warfarin therapy reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with heart failure, the overall benefit from warfarin in this population seems to be offset by the increased bleeding risk. Thus, whether patients with chronic heart failure might benefit from anticoagulation, especially in patients with sinus rhythm, is still controversial. Rivaroxaban, a new oral anticoagulant, is a selective direct factor Xa inhibitor that is used to reduce thrombin generation, which may bring hope to anticoagulation in patients with heart failure. However, the COMPASS trial and recently published COMMANDER HF trial presented different results. By carefully analyzing 2 clinical trials, we think several factors might explain this different outcome.

Topics: Chronic Disease; Clinical Decision-Making; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Selection; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant administered to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The Xarelto Post-Authorization Safety and Effectiveness Study in Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (XAPASS) was a prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance study that examined the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice. This sub-analysis of the XAPASS investigated the outcomes of patients with worsening renal function (WRF).. The XAPASS included 11,308 patients with NVAF who began treatment with rivaroxaban. Of 9578 patients who completed 1-year follow-up, the 7509 patients, for whom the change in creatinine clearance could be assessed, were included in the present analysis. Patients with WRF were those with a decrease in creatinine clearance of ≥20% from enrollment to any time point; patients with stable renal function (SRF) were those without such a decrease. Outcomes in patients with WRF versus SRF were compared at 1 year.. No association between WRF and occurrence of any bleeding, major bleeding, and stroke/systemic embolism/myocardial infarction was observed in patients with AF on rivaroxaban treatment during 1-year follow-up in real-world clinical practice. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01582737.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

After non-vitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulation agents (NOAC) have been approved for thrombo-embolic prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), utilization of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in NVAF has changed. Contemporary shifting from a VKA to a NOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) has not been quantified, and could help assess whether these drugs are used according to recommendations.. Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified all VKA-experienced NVAF patients initiating a NOAC from 22 August 2011 to 31 December 2015 (shifters) and all VKA-experienced NVAF patients who were not switched to NOACs (non-shifters). Baseline characteristics and temporal utilization trends were examined. We included 62 065 patients with NVAF; of these, 19 386 (29.6%) shifted from a VKA to a NOAC (9973 (54.2%) shifted to dabigatran, 4775 (26.0%) to rivaroxaban, and 3638 (19.8%) to apixaban). Shifting was associated with lower age [odds ratio (OR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.94-0.96 per 5 year increments], female gender (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.28-1.38), and certain co-morbidities: more often stroke, bleeding, heart failure, and alcohol abuse, and less often hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, and diabetes. Shifting was common and initially dominated by shifting from VKA to dabigatran, but at the end of 2015, most shifters were shifted to rivaroxaban (45%) or apixaban (45%) whereas shifting to dabigatran decreased (to 10%).. In a contemporary setting among VKA-experienced NVAF patients; VKA is still prevalent although about 30% by December 2015 had shifted to a NOAC.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Denmark; Drug Substitution; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

We assessed the real-life use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and exclusion criteria for randomized trials. From 2013 to 2016, 3,578 of 18,853 patients (19%) had exclusion criteria. Irrespective of which anticoagulant was chosen, they had more VTE recurrences (hazard ratio (HR): 3.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.47-3.88), major bleeds (HR: 4.10; 95% CI: 3.38-4.96), and deaths (HR: 9.47; 95% CI: 8.46-10.6) than those without exclusion criteria. During initial therapy, no patient with exclusion criteria on DOACs (n = 115) recurred, but those on rivaroxaban bled less often (adjusted HR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.04-0.79) than those on unfractionated heparin (n = 224) and similar to those (n = 3,172) on low-molecular-weight (LMWH) heparin. For long-term therapy, patients on rivaroxaban (n = 151) had nonsignificantly fewer VTE recurrences (adjusted HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.08-1.32) and major bleeds (adjusted HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.15-1.15) than those on LMWH (n = 2,071). The efficacy and safety of DOACs were similar to standard therapy.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Long Term Adverse Effects; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Background There is increasing evidence indicating oral factor Xa inhibitors can be used for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Studies are needed to compare oral factor Xa inhibitors, low molecular weight heparins, and warfarin in the oncology population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the recurrent venous thromboembolism incidence in oncology patients utilizing oral Xa inhibitors, low molecular weight heparins, or warfarin. Methods Using retrospectively collected data, we compared the recurrent venous thromboembolism incidence in oncology patients taking rivaroxaban/apixaban, enoxaparin, or warfarin with at least three months of follow-up. Patients were included if they had an active cancer, venous thromboembolism, and taking warfarin, enoxaparin, or rivaroxaban/apixaban. The primary endpoint was the first episode of recurrent venous thromboembolism at three months. Secondary endpoints included recurrent venous thromboembolism after six months, major bleeding, and mortality. Results Of 127 venous thromboembolism patients, 48 received rivaroxaban or apixaban, 23 received enoxaparin, and 56 received warfarin. The three most common cancer diagnoses were lung (21%), colorectal (14%), and breast (14%). There was no difference in venous thromboembolism recurrence at three months between the rivaroxaban/apixaban (0%), warfarin (3.6%), and the enoxaparin cohorts (4.4%) (p = 0.8319). Major bleeding at three months was only seen in one patient in the enoxaparin arm (4.2%). Mortality at three months was 0%, 3.6%, and 17.4% in the rivaroxaban/apixaban, warfarin, and enoxaparin cohorts, respectively. Conclusion The results of this retrospective study suggest that oral factor Xa inhibitors are potential options for cancer patients with venous thromboembolism. However, randomized, controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

To evaluate the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) treated at Ochsner Medical Center with the intent of determining the efficacy and safety of these agents.. Patients were identified by a retrospective data extraction of patients treated at Ochsner Medical Center from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2015. Patients were included for review if they were ≥18 years of age, with a confirmed diagnosis of VTE and active or history of cancer, and if they received dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, or edoxaban for at least 6 months. The primary objectives were the rate of recurrence of VTE and the incidence of bleeding at 6 months.. Thirty-seven patients were identified. Twelve patients were diagnosed with PE, 21 with DVT, 3 with DVT and PE, and 1 with DVT and superficial vein thrombosis (SVT). Apixaban was used most often (n = 27). No patients experienced a recurrent DVT or PE at 6 months. Two patients experienced adverse effects during treatment.. In this single-center, retrospective, observational study in patients with cancer receiving DOAC therapy, there were no episodes of recurrent VTE and only 2 episodes of clinically significant bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Although randomized trials demonstrate the noninferiority of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the context of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), little is known about how these drugs compare in practice.. To assess the relative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in a large health system and to evaluate this association by time in therapeutic range (TTR).. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with propensity matching in the Cleveland Clinic Health System. The study included patients initiated on warfarin or rivaroxaban for thromboembolic prevention in nonvalvular AF between January 2012 and July 2016. The main outcomes were thromboembolic events and major bleeds. Analyses were stratified by warfarin patients' TTR.. The cohort consisted of 472 propensity-matched pairs. The mean age was 73.6 years (SD = 11.7), and the mean CHADS. Under real-world conditions, warfarin and rivaroxaban were associated with similar safety and effectiveness, even among those with suboptimal therapeutic control. Individualized decision making, taking into account the nontherapeutic tradeoffs associated with these medications (eg, monitoring, half-life, cost) is warranted.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors, used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention, are the dominant non-Vitamin K oral anticoagulants on the market. While major bleeding may be less common with these agents compared to warfarin, it is always a risk, and little has been published on the most serious bleeding scenarios. This study describes a cohort of patients with FXa inhibitor-associated life-threatening bleeding events, their clinical characteristics, interventions and outcomes.. We performed a retrospective, 5-center review of FXa inhibitor-treated major bleeding patients. Investigators identified potential cases by cross-referencing ICD-9/10 codes for hemorrhage with medication lists. Investigators selected cases they deemed to require immediate reversal of coagulopathy, and reviewed charts for characteristics, reversal strategies and other interventions, and outcomes.. A total of 56 charts met the inclusion criteria for the retrospective cohort, including 29 (52%) gastrointestinal bleeds (GIB), 19 (34%) intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) and 8 (14%) others. Twenty-four (43%) patients received various factor or plasma products, and the remainder received supportive care. Thirty-day mortality was 21% (n=12). Re-anticoagulation within 30-days occurred in 23 (41%) patients. Thromboembolic events (TEEs) occurred in 6 (11%) patients. No differences were observed in outcomes by treatment strategy.. This cohort of FXa inhibitor-associated major bleeding scenarios deemed appropriate for acute anticoagulant reversal illustrates the variable approaches in the absence of a specific reversal agent.

Topics: Aged; Blood Coagulation Factors; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Plasma; Platelet Transfusion; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Non-vitamin K antagonist direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are fixed-dose regimens indicated for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Dose adjustment is necessary among patients with renal insufficiency to optimize efficacy and safety.. To assess DOAC dosing appropriateness and its effect on clinical outcomes in NVAF patients.. Adult NVAF patients with ≥1 DOAC pharmacy claim (January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014), continuous enrollment for ≥12 months post-index DOAC claim, and documented creatinine clearance within 3 months preindex date in the Optum/Humedica SmartFile database were eligible. DOAC dosage was classified as inappropriate or appropriate by level of renal function, age, and body weight per US prescription information. Cox proportional models were used to assess the risks of bleeding and stroke associated with inappropriate DOAC dosage.. Of the 388 eligible patients, 69 (17.8%) were inappropriately dosed, and rivaroxaban had the highest inappropriate dosing rate. Most inappropriately dosed patients were underdosed. Inappropriately dosed patients were more likely to be older, female, and have a body weight of ≤60 kg; they also had higher mean CHA. Inappropriate dosing occurred among patients with normal and insufficient renal function. The consideration of clinical factors beyond renal function is necessary to reduce bleeding risk associated with DOAC therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Young Adult

Comparative data of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) are lacking in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. We compared effectiveness and safety of standard and reduced dose NOAC in AF patients.. Using Danish nationwide registries, we included all oral anticoagulant-naïve AF patients who initiated NOAC treatment (2012-2016). Outcome-specific and mortality-specific multiple Cox regressions were combined to compute average treatment effects as 1-year standardized differences in stroke and bleeding risks (g-formula).. Amongst 31 522 AF patients, the distribution of NOAC/dose was as follows: dabigatran standard dose (22.4%), dabigatran-reduced dose (14.0%), rivaroxaban standard dose (21.8%), rivaroxaban reduced dose (6.7%), apixaban standard dose (22.9%), and apixaban reduced dose (12.2%). The 1-year standardized absolute risks of stroke/thromboembolism were 1.73-1.98% and 2.51-2.78% with standard and reduced NOAC dose, respectively, without statistically significant differences between NOACs for given dose level. Comparing standard doses, the 1-year standardized absolute risk (95% CI) for major bleeding was for rivaroxaban 2.78% (2.42-3.17%); corresponding absolute risk differences (95% CI) were for dabigatran -0.93% (-1.45% to -0.38%) and apixaban, -0.54% (-0.99% to -0.05%). The results for major bleeding were similar for reduced NOAC dose. The 1-year standardized absolute risk (95% CI) for intracranial bleeding was for standard dose dabigatran 0.19% (0.22-0.50%); corresponding absolute risk differences (95% CI) were for rivaroxaban 0.23% (0.06-0.41%) and apixaban, 0.18% (0.01-0.34%).. Standard and reduced dose NOACs, respectively, showed no significant risk difference for associated stroke/thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher bleeding risk compared with dabigatran and apixaban and dabigatran was associated with lower intracranial bleeding risk compared with rivaroxaban and apixaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Denmark; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The objective was to describe the implementation, work flow, and differences in outcomes between a pharmacist-managed clinic for the outpatient treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) using a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant versus care by a primary care provider (PCP).. Patients in the studied health system that are diagnosed with low-risk VTE in the emergency department are often discharged without hospital admission. These patients are treated with a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant and follow-up either in a pharmacist-managed VTE clinic or with their PCP. Pharmacists in the VTE clinic work independently under a collaborative practice agreement (CPA). An evaluation of 34 patients, 17 in each treatment arm, was conducted to compare the differences in treatment-related outcomes of rivaroxaban when managed by a pharmacist versus a PCP.. The primary endpoint was a 6-month composite of anticoagulation treatment-related complications that included a diagnosis of major bleeding, recurrent thromboembolism, or fatality due to either major bleeding or recurrent thromboembolism. Secondary endpoints included number of hospitalizations, adverse events, and medication adherence. There was no difference in the primary endpoint between groups with one occurrence of the composite endpoint in each treatment arm (p = 1.000), both of which were recurrent thromboembolic events. Medication adherence assessment was formally performed in eight patients in the pharmacist group versus no patients in the control group. No differences were seen among other secondary endpoints.. The pharmacist-managed clinic is a novel expansion of clinical pharmacy services that treats patients with low-risk VTEs with rivaroxaban in the outpatient setting. The evaluation of outcomes provides support that pharmacist-managed care utilizing standardized protocols under a CPA may be as safe as care by a PCP.

Topics: Ambulatory Care Facilities; Anticoagulants; Case-Control Studies; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pharmacists; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The JACRE-R Registry, in which 42 Japanese institutions participated, monitored the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). In the present analysis, we sought to elucidate the effects and risks of heparin bridging and different patterns of interruption/resumption of rivaroxaban on complications of CA.Methods and Results:We administered rivaroxaban during the perioperative period and recorded the incidence of complications up to 30 days after CA. A total of 1,118 patients were registered; 546 received heparin bridging and 572 did not. The bridging group showed a significantly higher incidence of non-major bleeding than the no-bridging group (4.03% vs. 0.87%; P=0.001). In the group receiving their last dose of rivaroxaban at 8-28 h before CA, neither thromboembolism nor major bleeding was observed during or after CA and the incidence of non-major bleeding was low (4/435, 0.92%). The incidence of non-major bleeding was significantly higher in the group resuming rivaroxaban ≥12 h after CA than in the group resuming <12 h (1.79% vs. 0.27%, P=0.045).. Heparin bridging increased the risk of non-major bleeding perioperatively. It was safe to stop rivaroxaban 8-28 h before the CA procedure, whereas resumption of the drug within 12 h of CA was associated with a lower incidence of non-major bleeding.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Drug Substitution; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Perioperative Period; Registries; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors

Once-daily dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may increase patient adherence to treatment but may also be associated with a higher risk of bleeding. In this study, we investigated the adherence to once- or twice-daily dosing of NOACs and the risk of bleeding in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. This multicenter cross-sectional study, conducted between 1 September 2015 and 28 February 2016, included 2214 patients receiving NOACs for at least 3 months, due to NVAF. Patients receiving once-daily or twice-daily NOAC doses were 1:1 propensity score matched for baseline demographic characteristics and the presence of other diseases. The medication adherence was assessed by the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Risk factors were investigated in relation to minor and major bleeding. The mean age of patients was 71 ± 10 years, and 53% of the patients were women. The medication adherence was lower in patients receiving twice-daily NOAC doses compared to once-daily-dose group (47% versus 53%, p = 0.001), and there was no difference between the groups in terms of minor (15% versus 16%, p = 0.292) and major bleeding (3% versus 3%, p = 0.796). Independent risk factors for bleeding were non-adherence to medication (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.23-2.14, p = 0.001), presence of 3 or more other diseases (OR: 10.3, 95% CI: 5.3-20.3, p < 0.001), and HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs or alcohol) score (OR: 4.84, 95% CI: 4.04-5.8, p < 0.001). In summary, the once-daily dose of NOACs was associated with increased patient adherence to medication, while it was not associated with bleeding complications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Turkey

In patients with atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation and cardioversion carry a risk of peri-procedural thromboembolic events; current guidelines recommend anticoagulation in these settings. This study aimed to report the baseline demographics and clinical characteristics of patients enrolled in the prospective, observational XANTUS study who underwent catheter ablation or cardioversion, and adverse outcomes with each of these procedures in patients treated with rivaroxaban.. Data collected included information on catheter ablation and cardioversion, and adverse outcomes occurring within 30 days of these procedures: incidence of treatment-emergent adjudicated symptomatic thromboembolic events and major bleeding; and cardiovascular and all-cause death. Incidence of these adverse outcomes at 42 days after cardioversion was also analysed. Patients undergoing either procedure had significantly lower mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores than those who did not, and were more frequently hospitalized at study baseline. Within a period of 30 days after intervention, symptomatic thromboembolic events were reported in 1.2% and 0.6% of patients undergoing ablation or cardioversion, respectively; major bleeding events were reported in 2.9% and 0.4% of patients undergoing ablation or cardioversion, respectively. No patients died within 30 days of intervention. Incidence of symptomatic thromboembolic and major bleeding events remained low at 42 days after cardioversion.. Similar to the results of prospective and non-interventional studies, the low rates of symptomatic thromboembolic events and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing ablation or cardioversion and treated with rivaroxaban in XANTUS suggest that its use is associated with an acceptable benefit-risk profile in this setting.. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01606995.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Electric Countershock; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proposed as a more convenient alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), which are commonly associated with poor treatment persistence in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (nv-AF).. Using data from the French national health care databases (Régime Général, 50 million beneficiaries), a cohort study was conducted to compare the 1-year non-persistence rates in nv-AF patients initiating dabigatran (N=11,141) or rivaroxaban (N=11,126) versus VKA (N=11,998). Treatment discontinuation was defined as a switch between oral anticoagulant (OAC) classes or a 60-day gap with no medication coverage, with the additional criterion of no reimbursement for international normalized ratio monitoring during this gap for VKA patients. Considering death as a competing risk, differences between 1-year discontinuation rates were used to compare each DOAC versus VKA. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated via bootstrapping. Baseline patient characteristics were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Subgroup analyses considered DOAC dose at initiation, age, risk of stroke, and bleeding.. Adjusted 1-year discontinuation rates were higher for dabigatran than for VKA new users (36.8% vs 30.2%; difference: 6.6% [95% CI, 5.5-7.6]) and for rivaroxaban versus VKA new users (33.4% vs 30.4%; 3.0% [1.9-4.1]). Similar differences were found in all subgroup analyses, except in dabigatran and rivaroxaban patients <75 years (dabigatran vs VKA: 0.3% [-1.4 to 1.8]; rivaroxaban vs VKA: -2.6% [-4.3 to -0.9]) and dabigatran 150 mg new users (-1.1% [-3.1 to 0.7]). Consistent results were obtained when considering both switches between OAC classes and death as competing risks of treatment discontinuation.. Results from this nationwide cohort study showed high non-persistence levels with all OACs and suggest that persistence with both dabigatran and rivaroxaban therapy is not better than persistence with VKA therapy. Hospitalizations for bleeding among non-persistent patients were unlikely to explain these high non-persistence rates.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; France; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

Cancer is a known hypercoagulable state that leads to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Low molecular weight heparin remains the preferred anticoagulant for VTE in patients with cancer over vitamin K antagonist. However, the preferred anticoagulant in prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cancer has yet to be determined. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly being utilized; however their role in cancer has only recently been investigated. The objective of this retrospective cohort was to describe real-world anticoagulation prescribing patterns in cancer patients at a large academic medical center between January 1, 2013 and October 31, 2016. We sought to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of DOACs in patients with cancer for either VTE and/or AF. Patient demographic, clinical characteristics, as well as bleeding and thrombotic events were collected. There were 214 patients in our analysis, of which 71 patients (33%) received a DOAC [apixaban (n = 22), dabigatran (n = 17), and rivaroxaban (n = 32)]. There were fewer bleeding events and/or discontinuations in the DOAC group compared to enoxaparin (13 vs. 27, p = 0.022). There was no difference in major or minor bleeds or thromboembolic events in comparing DOAC to enoxaparin or DOAC to warfarin. This was a retrospective, single-institution study assessing the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to warfarin or enoxaparin in patients with cancer. DOACs may represent an alternative to warfarin or enoxaparin in patients with cancer for VTE and/or stroke reduction in AF.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The objective of this project was to compare the time from initiation of oral anticoagulation to hospital discharge between warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). This retrospective observational study was done at a single VA medical center. A total of 107 patients were included, with 42 patients (39%) in the DOAC group, which included rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban, and 65 patients (61%) in the warfarin group. Variables collected through chart review included comorbid conditions, time from initiation of oral anticoagulation to discharge, emergency department (ED) visits and readmission within 30 or 90 days, and bleeding events. The DOAC group had a shorter time to discharge compared to the warfarin group (28 vs. 114 h, p < 0.001). There were similar 30 and 90-day hospital readmission rates and/or ED visits for DOACs (23.8 and 33.3%) compared to warfarin (18.5 and 30.8%), including those related to bleeding of any severity (11.9% for DOACs vs. 9.2% for warfarin; p = 0.75). There was one major bleeding event in the DOAC group and two in the warfarin group. The use of DOACs for the treatment of acute VTE in hospitalized patients was associated with shorter time to hospital discharge when compared to warfarin.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Readmission; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Information on utilization of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in nursing homes is scarce. This study aimed to (i) describe OAC use in German nursing home residents, (ii) examine factors influencing whether treatment is initiated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and (iii) assess which conditions predict switching to NOAC instead of continuing VKA.. Using claims data (2010-2014), we studied a cohort of new nursing home residents aged ≥65 years receiving OAC. Further, OAC use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) was examined over the years.. Overall, 16 804 patients (median age: 85 years, 75% female, 44% with renal disease) were included. The majority received phenprocoumon as first OAC (58.0%), followed by rivaroxaban (28.1%). Over the study period, NOAC use increased substantially. Initiating NOAC instead of VKA was predicted by a previous stroke (adjusted odds ratio: 1.76; 95% confidence interval: 1.49-2.08). In contrast, renal disease predicted VKA initiation (0.66; 0.59-0.75) as did the presence of a prosthetic heart valve. Switching from VKA to NOAC was predicted by a stroke (2.55; 2.00-3.24), bleeding events and a recent hospitalization. During 2010-2014, the proportion of AF patients with a CHADS2 score ≥2 receiving OAC increased from 27% to 46%.. NOACs are increasingly used in German nursing homes, both for initial anticoagulation but also in VKA pre-treated patients. Switching from VKA to NOAC was substantially influenced by aspects such as intended higher effectiveness and safety but probably also practicability due to less blood monitoring.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Drug Monitoring; Female; Germany; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Male; Nursing Homes; Phenprocoumon; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

The development of non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is a new alternative to treatment with warfarin. The purpose of this study was to explore drug prescription decisions of NOACs or warfarin from hospital physicians in cardiovascular departments.. A qualitative study with focus group interviews was conducted in three different hospitals. The interview guide explored the background of prescribing anticoagulants (warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) and experiences with effect and side-effects they had observed in patients.. The systematic text condensation eluded four main themes: when to prescribe NOACs, concern about side-effects, pharmaceutical properties and patient adherence, and prescribing policy and intra-professional communication. All available anticoagulants were prescribed. However, no specific NOAC was preferred. Factors perceived as contraindications for NOACs varied among the doctors. Most had observed side-effects of NOACs; however, these rarely influenced prescribing decisions due to small differences in safety profiles. Few drug-drug interactions and fixed daily doses made NOACs easy to prescribe; but some doctors had experienced lack of drug effect for some patients. Non-adherence with NOACs was harder to spot. Some different prescribing cultures had evolved between the different hospitals and between general practitioners.. The hospital physicians chose anticoagulants based on patient conditions as renal function, bleeding risks, and drug interactions being the most common taken into account. They could not say which NOAC was best, and wish that future studies could compare the different NOACs, and not just compare with warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Decision-Making; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Focus Groups; General Practitioners; Hemorrhage; Humans; Medical Staff, Hospital; Medication Adherence; Norway; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Qualitative Research; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

To assess the outcome of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), specifically Xa inhibitors: rivaroxaban and apixaban, for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of atypical location (VTE-AL), portal, mesenteric, hepatic, splenic, gonadal, renal, and cerebral veins, prospectively collected data of Mayo Thrombophilia Clinic Registry were used.. Patients with acute VTE-AL treated with DOACs, enrolled between March 1, 2013, and February 1, 2017, were compared with patients with VTE of typical location (VTE-TL: deep vein thrombosis of extremities and/or pulmonary embolism) receiving DOACs and with patients with VTE-AL treated with enoxaparin.. Out of 623 patients with acute VTE receiving the study drug within 14 days of diagnosis, there were 63 with VTE-AL: 36 on DOAC, 23 on enoxaparin, and 4 on warfarin; 352 received DOAC for VTE-TL. The VTE-AL treated with DOAC/enoxaparin included the following: splanchnic (26/22), ovarian (8/2), renal (3/5), and cerebral veins (1/1), respectively. Recurrence rate (per 100 person-years) for the VTE-AL group receiving DOAC was 7.3, which was not different when compared with those for VTE-TL (2.4; P=.13) and VTE-AL groups receiving enoxaparin (23.7; P=.37). Major bleeding rate in the VTE-AL group receiving DOAC was not different compared with those for VTE-TL (7.2 vs 3.0; P=.26) and VTE-AL groups on enoxaparin (22.4; P=.31). Mortality was higher in the VTE-AL group on DOAC compared with the VTE-TL group (21.45 [95% CI, 7.87-46.69] vs 8.26 [95% CI, 5.35, 12.20]; P=.03). All patients with VTE-AL with events had cancer.. The VTE recurrence and bleeding rates for rivaroxaban and apixaban used in VTE-AL are not different from those in patients with VTE-TL and similar to that for enoxaparin.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Purpose Although low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) remains the standard of care, factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban may serve as an alternative treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active malignancy. The purpose of the analysis was to evaluate outcomes of VTE management in cancer patients treated with rivaroxaban compared to enoxaparin. Methods This single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with malignancy-associated VTE initiated on treatment with either rivaroxaban or enoxaparin. The primary endpoint was the incidence of recurrent VTE. Secondary outcomes included a comparison in rates of bleeding, mean duration of treatment, and mean time to recurrence of VTE. Results A total of 45 patients were included in each group. The incidence of recurrent VTE was 8.9% in the rivaroxaban group versus 13.3% in the enoxaparin group ( p = 0.53). There were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcomes with the exception of longer mean duration of treatment in the rivaroxaban group compared to the enoxaparin group (169 vs. 110 days, respectively; p = 0.04). Conclusions This study provides important preliminary information regarding the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for treatment of VTE in cancer patients. Although LMWH should remain the standard of care, these results provide initial reassurance that rivaroxaban serves as a viable alternative in the event that injectable anticoagulation is not an acceptable approach to VTE management.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Drug Synergism; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Taiwan

Alveolar hemorrhage (AH) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome with a high mortality rate that is characterized by extensive bleeding into the alveolar spaces. AH usually develops secondary to immunological disease and, less frequently, to drug use. Presently described is the case of an 86-year-old woman with AH who had been using rivaroxaban for 6 months.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Lung; Pulmonary Alveoli; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Aspirin; Blood Coagulation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Decision-Making; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Phenprocoumon; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

Patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) frequently undergo interventional procedures requiring temporary discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy. Little is known about remaining peri-procedural exposure to rivaroxaban in real-world patients.. Fifty-six patients with rivaroxaban treatment and scheduled cardiac catheterization were included in this prospective, observational, and single-center study. Rivaroxaban concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS and a chromogenic anti-Xa assay. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was carried out on LC-MS/MS concentration data using NONMEM software, and results were applied to Monte Carlo simulations to predict appropriate rivaroxaban discontinuation intervals.. Rivaroxaban concentrations ranged from

Topics: Aged; Cardiac Catheterization; Chromatography, Liquid; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Monte Carlo Method; Nonlinear Dynamics; Preoperative Period; Rivaroxaban; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Randomized clinical trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin in cancer patients have not been performed. We evaluated the effectiveness and associated risk of DOACs vs warfarin, as well as comparisons of DOACs, in a large population of cancer patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Using the MarketScan databases, we identified 16 096 AF patients (mean age, 74 years) initiating oral anticoagulant and being actively treated for cancer between 2010 and 2014. Anticoagulant users were matched by age, sex, enrollment date, and drug initiation date. Study end points were identified with diagnostic codes and included ischemic stroke, severe bleeding, other bleeding, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Cox regression was used to estimate associations of anticoagulants with study end points. Compared with warfarin, rates of bleeding (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) were similar in rivaroxaban (1.09 [0.79, 1.39]) and dabigatran (0.96 [0.72, 1.27]) users, whereas apixaban users experienced lower rates (0.37 [0.17, 0.79]). Rates of ischemic stroke did not differ among anticoagulant users. Compared with warfarin, rate of VTE (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) was lower among rivaroxaban (0.51 [0.41, 0.63]), dabigatran (0.28 [0.21, 0.38]), and apixaban (0.14 [0.07, 0.32]) users. In head-to-head comparisons among DOACs, dabigatran users had lower rates of VTE than rivaroxaban users; apixaban users had lower rates of VTE and severe bleeding than rivaroxaban users. In this population of patients with AF and cancer, DOAC users experienced lower or similar rates of bleeding and stroke compared with warfarin users, and a lower rate of incident VTE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin; Young Adult

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Survival Analysis; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

Anticoagulation is used to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients, but may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding. VTE recurrence and major bleeding were assessed in cancer patients treated for VTE with the most currently prescribed anticoagulants in clinical practice. Newly diagnosed cancer patients (first VTE 1/1/2013-05/31/2015) who initiated rivaroxaban, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), or warfarin were identified from Humana claims data and observed until end of eligibility or end of data availability. VTE recurrence was a hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of VTE ≥7 days after first VTE. Major bleeding events on treatment were identified using validated criteria. Cohorts were compared using Kaplan-Meier rates at 6 and 12 months and Cox proportional hazards models. Cohorts were adjusted for their differences at baseline. A total of 2428 patients (rivaroxaban: 707; LMWH: 660; warfarin: 1061) met inclusion criteria. Patient characteristics were well balanced after weighting. There was a trend for lower VTE recurrence rates in rivaroxaban users compared to LMWH users at 6 months (13.2% vs. 17.1%; P = .060) and significantly lower at 12 months (16.5% vs. 22.2%; P = .030) [HR: 0.72, 95% CI: (0.52-0.95); P = .024]. VTE recurrence rates were also lower for rivaroxaban than warfarin users at 6 months (13.2% vs. 17.5%; P = .014) and 12 months (15.7% vs. 19.9%; P = .017) [HR: 0.74, 95% CI: (0.56-0.96); P = .028]. Major bleeding rates were similar across cohorts. This real-world analysis suggests cancer patients with VTE treated with rivaroxaban had significantly lower risk of recurrent VTE and similar risk of bleeding compared to those treated with LMWH or warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Topics: Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

In the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease, novel oral anticoagulants have emerged as alternatives to warfarin. A major challenge continues to be the reversal of their anticoagulant effect in the case of life-threatening haemorrhagic complications. We report a case of spontaneous splenic rupture treated by splenic artery embolisation in a 77-year-old woman who was anticoagulated with rivaroxaban.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Rupture, Spontaneous; Splenic Artery; Splenic Rupture

: The number of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NV-AF) who require long-term anticoagulation and also have a higher risk of bleeding is increasing. Recently, there is no information regarding real on-treatment anti-Xa activity in patients with NV-AF and a higher risk of bleeding who receive oral factor Xa inhibitors. The aim of this study was to determine trough and peak anti-Xa activity in these patients. This single-centre pilot study enrolled 41 patients with NV-AF and a higher risk of bleeding defined as Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly score at least 3 points. Twenty-one patients were treated with rivaroxaban and 17 patients were treated with apixaban. The trough and peak samples of these patients were tested for anti-Xa activity with factor Xa-calibrated anti-Xa chromogenic analysis. The detected trough anti-Xa activity was 63.2 ± 44.4 ng/ml. There was a significant increase in peak anti-Xa activity up to 170.3 ± 99.6 ng/ml (P < 0.001) observed. There were no significant differences in trough (52.4 ± 41.9 vs. 76.0 ± 45.4 ng/ml; P = 0.12) and peak (187.2 ± 122.5 vs. 151.5 ± 64.0 ng/ml; P = 0.27) anti-Xa activity between rivaroxaban-treated and apixaban-treated patients. This study demonstrated the anti-Xa activity in oral factor Xa inhibitor-treated patients with NV-AF and a higher risk of bleeding. No significant differences in this activity between rivaroxaban-treated and apixaban-treated patients were found.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban (20 mg/15 mg once daily) is an effective and safe alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF). Low-dose rivaroxaban (15 mg/10 mg once daily) has been only approved for NVAF patients in Japan and Taiwan, although its effectiveness and safety at low doses remain unclear among Asians with NVAF. The objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of low-dose rivaroxaban to those of warfarin among Asians with NVAF.. This dynamic cohort study used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database (NHIRD) to enroll 14,971 patients taking 15 mg rivaroxaban, 11,029 patients taking 10 mg rivaroxaban, and 16,000 NVAF patients taking warfarin. Inverse probability of weighting using propensity scores was used to balance covariates across study groups.. The adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] comparing rivaroxaban 15 and 10 mg with warfarin (reference) was as follows: ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, 0.84 [0.74-0.96; P = 0.0080], and 0.84 [0.73-0.96; P = 0.0097]; myocardial infarction, 0.53 [0.37-0.74; P = 0.0002], and 0.88 [0.65-1.19; P = 0.3910]; intracranial hemorrhage, 0.44 [0.34-0.55; P < 0.0001], and 0.53 [0.42-0.66; P < 0.0001]; major gastrointestinal bleeding, 0.82 [0.67-0.99; P = 0.0387], and 0.58 [0.47-0.72; P < 0.0001]; all hospitalized major bleeding, 0.63 [0.55-0.73; P < 0.0001], and 0.56 [0.48-0.65; P < 0.0001]; and all-cause mortality, 0.55 [0.51-0.60; P < 0.0001], and 0.58 [0.53-0.63; P < 0.0001].. Both low doses of rivaroxaban were associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, all major bleeding, and all-cause mortality compared with warfarin in Asian NVAF patients. The 15 mg rivaroxaban dose was associated with a lower risk of acute myocardial infarction compared to warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Taiwan; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Real-world data are a well-recognized component within the drug lifecycle, and such data are generated from a range of sources and study designs, including claims databases, electronic health records, non-interventional studies (NIS) and registries. While this information can be of vital clinical importance, there may be challenges in understanding the relevance of the differing study designs, endpoints and populations. Here, we summarize the value of real-world evidence and considerations pertinent to their use in clinical research. Owing to the variety of analyses being conducted using real-world data, it is important for researchers and clinicians to have a clear understanding of the nature and origin of those data, and to ensure they are valid, reliable and robust in terms of extrapolating meaningful findings. There are crucial questions to address when evaluating real-world studies, and we introduce a checklist to meet these objectives. In addition to advice for appraising data quality and study designs, several updates will be covered from real-world studies of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF): the nationwide Danish cohort study, U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System database, retrospective claim database study REAFFIRM and a pooled analysis from the global NIS XArelto on preveNtion of sTroke and non-central nervoUS system systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (XANTUS). Real-world studies consistently show that rivaroxaban is an effective treatment option with acceptable safety when used for stroke prevention in a large number of patients with AF across the globe.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

With improved life expectancy and the aging population, the global burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to increase, and with AF comes an estimated fivefold increased risk of ischaemic stroke. Prophylactic anticoagulant therapy is more effective in reducing the risk of ischaemic stroke in AF patients than acetylsalicylic acid or dual-antiplatelet therapy combining ASA with clopidogrel. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are the standard of care for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF. The optimal anticoagulant strategy to prevent thromboembolism in AF patients who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting, those who have undergone successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement and those with embolic stroke of undetermined source are areas of ongoing research. This article provides an update on three randomized controlled trials of rivaroxaban, a direct, oral factor Xa inhibitor, that are complete or are ongoing, in these unmet areas of stroke prevention: oPen-label, randomized, controlled, multicentre study explorIng twO treatmeNt stratEgiEs of Rivaroxaban and a dose-adjusted oral vitamin K antagonist treatment strategy in patients with Atrial Fibrillation who undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PIONEER AF-PCI) trial; the New Approach riVaroxaban Inhibition of factor Xa in a Global trial vs Aspirin to prevenT Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (NAVIGATE ESUS) trial and the Global study comparing a rivAroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy to an antipLatelet-based strategy after transcatheter aortIc vaLve rEplacement to Optimize clinical outcomes (GALILEO) trial. The data from these studies are anticipated to help address continuing challenges for a range of patients at risk of stroke.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement; Treatment Outcome

Different outcomes among patients hospitalized for bleeding after starting anticoagulation could influence choice of anticoagulant. We compared length of hospitalization, proportion of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions, ICU length of stay, and 30- and 90-day mortality for adults with atrial fibrillation hospitalized for bleeding after starting warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban.. An US commercial database of 38 million members from 1 November 2010 to 31 March 2014 was used to examine adults with atrial fibrillation hospitalized for bleeding after starting warfarin (2,446), dabigatran (442), or rivaroxaban (256). Outcomes included difference in mean total length of hospitalization, proportion of ICU admissions, mean length of ICU stay, and all-cause 30- and 90-day mortality.. Warfarin users were older and had more comorbidities. Multivariable regression modeling with propensity score weighting showed warfarin users were hospitalized 2.0 days longer (95% CI 1.8-2.3; p < 0.001) than dabigatran users and 2.6 days longer (95% CI 2.4-2.9; p < 0.001) than rivaroxaban users. Dabigatran users were hospitalized 0.6 days longer (95% CI 0.2-1.0; p = 0.001) than rivaroxaban users. There were no differences in the proportion of ICU admissions. Among ICU admissions, warfarin users stayed 3.0 days (95% CI 1.9-3.9; p < 0.001) longer than dabigatran users and 2.4 days longer (95% CI 0.9-3.7; p = 0.003) than rivaroxaban users. There was no difference in ICU stay between dabigatran and rivaroxaban users. There were no differences in 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality.. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran were associated with shorter hospitalizations; however, there were no differences in 30- and 90-day mortality. These findings suggest bleeding associated with the newer agents is not more dangerous than bleeding associated with warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Length of Stay; Male; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

This study was conducted to describe the real-world hospital length of stay in patients treated with all of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin for new-onset venous thromboembolism (VTE) at a large, tertiary, academic medical center. A retrospective cohort analysis of all adult patients diagnosed with acute onset VTE was conducted. Of the 441 patients included, 261 (57%) patients received DOACs versus 180 (41%) patients received warfarin. In the DOAC group, a total of 92 (35%) patients received rivaroxaban, followed by 83 (32%) patients received apixaban, 50 (19%) patients received dabigatran, and 36 (14%) patients received edoxaban. Patients initiated on DOACs had a statistically significant shorter hospital length of stay compared to patients initiated on warfarin (median 3 days, [IQR 0-5] vs. 8 days [IQR 5-11], P < 0.05). Despite the shorter hospital length of stay in patients receiving DOACs, the overall reported differences between the DOACs group and the warfarin group in terms of recurrent VTE, major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding at 3 and 6 months were deemed to be statistically insignificant.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Thromboembolic events such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are well-known complications that can occur after prothrombin complex concentrate therapy. However, acute myocardial infarction is a very rare but potentially life-threatening complication that was exclusively described in patients with bleeding disorders who received chronic and recurrent concentrate infusions. We report the case of a 70 year-old male patient with cholangiocarcinoma who was admitted to our hospital with worsening fatigue and weakness. His stay was complicated by uncontrolled bleeding secondary to rivaroxaban use and advanced liver disease. By the end of the prothrombin complex concentrate infusion used to reverse his coagulopathy, patient developed ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock and passed away. This is the first reported case of acute myocardial infarction that occurs in a patient without hemophilia and after the first prothrombin complex concentrate infusion.

Topics: Aged; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Blood Coagulation Factors; Cholangiocarcinoma; Fatal Outcome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Shock, Cardiogenic; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction