rivaroxaban and Heart-Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health issue associated with significantly increased risk of stroke. It remains uncertain whether oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm (HF-SR) could improve prognosis.. We performed a systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases for randomized controlled clinical trials assessing oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelets or placebo in patients with HF or ventricular dysfunction/cardiomyopathy without clinical HF and SR. The outcomes assessed were stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization.. Seven trials of 15,794 patients were eligible for our analyses. The overall follow-up duration was 32,367 patient-years corresponding to a mean follow-up of 2.05 years per patient. Four trials included patients treated with warfarin and three included patients treated with rivaroxaban. OAC was associated with reduced rate of stroke or systemic embolism compared to control (odds ratio (OR): 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44, 0.73, number needed to treat (NNT): 71.9) but higher rate of major bleeding (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.47, 2.50, number needed to harm (NNH): 57.1). In the subgroup analysis according to the type of OAC, rivaroxaban was associated with significantly reduced rate of stroke or systemic embolism (1.24 vs 1.97 events per 100 patient-years, respectively, OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.88, NNT: 82) and higher risk of major bleeding (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.26, 2.20) compared to antiplatelets or placebo. There was no significant differences between groups for the outcomes of myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization.. This analysis shows that any benefit of OAC for stroke prevention may be offset by an increased risk of major bleeding in HF-SR patients. A well-designed randomized controlled trial of newer safer OACs is needed in this population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamins

Patients with heart failure (HF) in sinus rhythm (SR) experience an increased incidence of thromboembolic events including stroke. Among patients with HF, high-quality evidence supports the use of oral anticoagulation when atrial fibrillation is present, but the benefit of anticoagulation in SR in the absence of other known indications for anticoagulation is unclear. In four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), warfarin did not improve a composite of clinical outcomes compared with aspirin or placebo in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and SR. A recent RCT assessed the efficacy of the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban versus placebo in patients with HFrEF (including mildly reduced ejection fraction), SR, and coronary artery disease. While rivaroxaban had a neutral effect on the primary composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality, exploratory analyses revealed a significant reduction in strokes. It is thus possible that a subgroup of patients with HFrEF who are at high risk of stroke may benefit from anticoagulation. The challenge is to adequately identify this subgroup and to balance the potential benefit of anticoagulation with the risk of major bleeding. There is also an unmet need for evidence around anticoagulation in HF with preserved ejection fraction and SR. This review explores the current evidence around anticoagulation in patients with HF and SR, identifies challenges regarding outcome definitions and patient selection, and offers suggestions for future research.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Failure; Humans; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

People with chronic heart failure (HF) are at risk of thromboembolic events, including stroke, pulmonary embolism, and peripheral arterial embolism; coronary ischaemic events also contribute to the progression of HF. The use of long-term oral anticoagulation is established in certain populations, including people with HF and atrial fibrillation (AF), but there is wide variation in the indications and use of oral anticoagulation in the broader HF population.. To determine whether long-term oral anticoagulation reduces total deaths and stroke in people with heart failure in sinus rhythm.. We updated the searches in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase in March 2020. We screened reference lists of papers and abstracts from national and international cardiovascular meetings to identify unpublished studies. We contacted relevant authors to obtain further data. We did not apply any language restrictions.. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing oral anticoagulants with placebo or no treatment in adults with HF, with treatment duration of at least one month. We made inclusion decisions in duplicate, and resolved any disagreements between review authors by discussion, or a third party.. Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, and assessed the risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy by calculating odds ratio (OR), accompanied by the 95% confidence intervals (CI).. We identified three RCTs (5498 participants). One RCT compared warfarin, aspirin, and no antithrombotic therapy, the second compared warfarin with placebo in participants with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and the third compared rivaroxaban with placebo in participants with HF and coronary artery disease. We pooled data from the studies that compared warfarin with a placebo or no treatment. We are uncertain if there is an effect on all-cause death (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.18; 2 studies, 324 participants; low-certainty evidence); warfarin may increase the risk of major bleeding events (OR 5.98, 95% CI 1.71 to 20.93, NNTH 17). 2 studies, 324 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported stroke as an individual outcome. Rivaroxaban makes little to no difference to all-cause death compared with placebo (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.13; 1 study, 5022 participants; high-certainty evidence). Rivaroxaban probably reduces the risk of stroke compared to placebo (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95; NNTB 101; 1 study, 5022 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and probably increases the risk of major bleeding events (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.33; NNTH 79; 1 study, 5008 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).. Based on the three RCTs, there is no evidence that oral anticoagulant therapy modifies mortality in people with HF in sinus rhythm. The evidence is uncertain if warfarin has any effect on all-cause death compared to placebo or no treatment, but it may increase the risk of major bleeding events. There is no evidence of a difference in the effect of rivaroxaban on all-cause death compared to placebo. It probably reduces the risk of stroke, but probably increases the risk of major bleedings. The available evidence does not support the routine use of anticoagulation in people with HF who remain in sinus rhythm.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated; Chronic Disease; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Hemorrhage; Humans; Placebo Effect; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xa inhibitors in patients with heart failure (HF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD).. A systematic electronic literature search was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to June 26, 2019. A total of four randomized controlled trials involving 14,694 patients were included in this meta-analysis.. The meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical difference between the Xa inhibitor and control group regarding the primary efficacy outcome [rivaroxaban 2.5 mg group: relative risk (RR) 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.01, P=0.06; rivaroxaban 5 mg group: RR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.73-1.02, P=0.08]. The risk of the primary safety outcome was significantly increased among patients who received Xa inhibitors compared with the control group (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg group: RR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.21-1.98, P=0.0006; rivaroxaban 5 mg group: RR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.30-2.12, P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the risk of cardiovascular death between the Xa inhibitor and control group (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg group: RR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.54-1.14, P=0.21; rivaroxaban 5 mg group: RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.73-1.08, P=0.24). The risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in the rivaroxaban 5 mg group was significantly lower than that of the control group (RR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.69-0.99, P=0.04). However, the risk of MI in the rivaroxaban 2.5 mg group was similar to that of the control group (RR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.71-1.01, P=0.07).. Xa inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding among HF and CAD or PAD patients. Therefore, Xa inhibitors should be used cautiously in patients with HF and CAD or PAD.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban

To recommend the proper anticoagulant drug and its dose for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to make the comparisons among non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin with regard to efficacy (stroke or systemic embolism) and safety (major bleeding).. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library with the items: "dabigatran, edoxaban, apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin, atrial fibrillation and heart failure" through April 14, 2020, focusing on the RCTs comparing the effect of NOACs to warfarin in patients with AF and HF. The NMA was performed based on R (version3.5.1) recalling JAGS (version4.3.0) with gemtc package. Moreover, NetMetaXL (version1.6.1) and winBUGS (version1.4.3) were employed to obtain the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) of the anticoagulants.. There was a high probability that dabigatran150 (SUCRA 0.82) ranked the first for the most effective drug, followed by apixaban (SUCRA 0.81), edoxaban60 (SUCRA 0.57) and rivaroxaban (SUCRA 0.52). However, with respect to safety for preventing major bleeding, edoxaban30 (SUCRA 0.99) ranked as the safest drug, followed by apixaban (SUCRA 0.71), edoxaban 60 (SUCRA 0.59) and dabigatran150 (SUCRA 0.55).. Apixaban, edoxaban60 and dabigatran150 were more likely to become the choice for preventing stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding in patients with AF and HF. Nevertheless, more trials need to be performed to focus on the effect of NOACs on the efficacy outcome due to the sparse data. In addition, caution should be excised over selecting the NOAC and its dose on account of the lacking head-to-head comparisons.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Heart Failure; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The prevention of atherothrombotic events is an essential therapeutic goal in the treatment of patients with arteriosclerotic diseases. After plaque rupture, a rapidly growing thrombus can lead to acute vascular occlusion and thus heart attack, stroke or limb ischaemia. The acute therapy combines anticoagulation and platelet inhibition. However, the only available therapy so far in the primary and secondary prevention of stable patients is the platelet inhibitors aspirin and clopidogrel. Despite the use of antiplatelet therapies, including aspirin and P2Y. Die Verhinderung atherothrombotischer Ereignisse ist ein wesentliches therapeutisches Ziel bei der Behandlung von Patienten mit arteriosklerotischen Erkrankungen. Ein schnell wachsender Thrombus kann nach Plaqueruptur zu akutem Gefäßverschluss und damit zu Herzinfarkt, Schlaganfall oder Ischämie der Extremitäten führen. Die Akuttherapie kombiniert Antikoagulation und Thrombozytenhemmung. Die bislang einzige verfügbare Therapie in der Primär- und Sekundärprävention stabiler Patienten sind jedoch die Thrombozytenaggregationshemmer Aspirin und Clopidogrel. Trotz der Verwendung von Thrombozytenaggregationshemmern, einschließlich Aspirin und P2Y12-Rezeptorantagonisten, leiden einige Patienten mit Arterienerkrankungen weiterhin unter kardiovaskulären ischämischen Ereignissen, die auf eine übermäßige Thrombinbildung nach der akuten Phase zurückzuführen sind. Als ein Ergebnis haben Studien Nicht-Vitamin-K-Antagonist-orale Antikoagulantien (NOAKs) getestet, insbesondere die Faktor-Xa-Inhibitoren, entweder allein oder in Kombination mit einer Antiplättchen-Therapie bei der Behandlung von arteriellen Erkrankungen. Die COMPASS-Studie untersuchte erstmals die niedrig dosierte Antikoagulation bei stabiler koronarer Herzkrankheit oder peripherer arterieller Verschlusskrankheit. Die Zugabe von 2 × 2,5 mg Rivaroxaban zur Langzeit-Aspirintherapie verhinderte nicht nur kardiovaskulären Tod, Myokardinfarkt und Schlaganfall, sondern reduzierte sogar die Gesamtmortalität um 18% nach einer mittleren Nachbeobachtungszeit von 23 Monaten. Dieser Vorteil ging auf Kosten von mehr gastrointestinalen Blutungen, die durch die Zugabe eines Protonenpumpenhemmers reduziert werden könnten (Untersuchungen laufen noch). Interessanterweise gab es jedoch keine Zunahme von tödlichen oder intrakraniellen Blutungen. Daher könnte in naher Zukunft eine neue Standardtherapie für Hochrisikopatienten mit atherosklerotischer Erkrankung verfügbar werden.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Atherosclerosis; Coronary Disease; Heart Failure; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

Current evidence indicates that heart failure (HF) confers a hyper-coagulable state that is associated with adverse events including stroke, systemic embolism, and mortality. This may be due to the elevated levels of pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory cytokines that are seen in patients with acute and chronic HF. Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in patients with systolic dysfunction predispose to local thrombosis due to blood stasis as does atrial fibrillation (AF) which leads to blood stasis in regions of the atria. The high risk of thromboemboli in HF patients with AF has resulted in the use anticoagulation therapy to prevent the occurrence of catastrophic events. There is evidence, however, that the pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic state that exists in HF puts patients who are in sinus rhythm at risk. The novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been shown in RCT to have at least equivalent efficacy in reducing stroke as warfarin while exposing patients to a lower risk of bleeding. The fact that the NOACs don't require routine monitoring to assure that patients remain within the therapeutic range and have relatively simple dosing requirements and a safer risk profile makes them attractive substitutes to warfarin in HF patients with atrial fibrillation and other conditions (e.g. deep venous thrombosis). Post hoc analyses from a subset of HF patients from the RCTs in AF patients have demonstrated similar findings as were reported in the entire populations that were included in the trials. As a result, NOACS are commonly used now in HF patients with AF. For HF patients with reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm, the use of warfarin in randomized clinical trials (RCT) to reduce stroke has been disappointing and associated with increase bleeding risk when compared to aspirin. The advantages of the NOACs over warfarin, however, raise the question of whether they might improve outcomes in HF patients who are in sinus rhythm. The currently ongoing COMMANDER-HF trial has been designed to address this issue. In this chapter we review evidence of existence of a prothombotic state in HF, the pharmacodynamics and clinical trials of the NOACs and the outcomes from NOAC substudies in the HF subgroup. We also discuss the rationale for using anticoagulation in HF independent of arrhythmia burden.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) by a meta-analysis.. AF is quite prevalent in patients with HF.. Four phase III clinical trials comparing NOACs to warfarin in patients with AF were included. Each patient was defined as affected by HF according to the criteria of the trial in which the patient was enrolled. Pre-specified outcomes were the composite of stroke/systemic embolism (SSE); major, intracranial, and any bleeding; and cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause death.. A total of 55,011 patients were enrolled, 26,384 (48%) with HF, and 28,627 (52%) without HF; 27,518 receiving NOACs and 27,493 receiving warfarin (median, 70 years of age; 36% females; follow-up: 1.5 to 2.8 years). Rates of SSE (relative risk [RR]: 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 1.07]; p = 0.68) and major bleeding (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.03; p = 0.21) were comparable in patients with and without HF. HF patients had reduced rates of any (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.91; p < 0.01) and intracranial (RR: 0.74 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.88; p < 0.01) bleeding but increased rates of all-cause (RR: 1.70 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.19; p < 0.01) and CV death (RR: 2.05 95% CI: 1.66 to 2.55; p < 0.01). NOACs, compared with warfarin significantly reduced SSE and major, intracranial, and any bleeding, regardless of the presence or absence of HF (p. Patients with AF and HF had increased mortality but reduced rates of intracranial and any bleeding compared with the no-HF patients, with no differences in rates of SSE and major bleeding. NOACs significantly reduced SSE, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage in HF patients. No interactions in efficacy and safety of NOACs were observed between AF patients with and without HF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Mortality; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist and share a reciprocal relationship. The presence of AF increases the propensity to HF and can worsen its severity as well as escalating the risk of stroke. Despite the proven efficacy of vitamin K antagonists and warfarin for stroke prevention in AF, their use is beset by numerous problems. These include their slow onset and offset of action, unpredictability of response, the need for frequent coagulant monitoring and serious concerns around the increased risks of intracranial and major bleeding. Three recently approved novel anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) are already challenging warfarin use in AF. They have a predictable therapeutic response and a wide therapeutic range and do not necessitate coagulation monitoring. In this article, the relationship between HF and AF and the mechanisms for their compounded stroke risk are reviewed. The evidence to support the use of these three NOACs amongst patients with AF and HF is further explored.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Chronic Disease; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

COMMANDER-HF was a randomised trial comparing rivaroxaban 2.5 mg two times a day to placebo, in addition to antiplatelet therapy, in patients hospitalised for worsening heart failure with coronary artery disease and sinus rhythm. Patients with diabetes are at increased risk of cardiovascular events and therefore have more to gain.. In this post-hoc analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with (n=2052) and without diabetes (n=2970). The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) or ischaemic stroke. HRs and 95% CIs with interaction analyses were used to describe event-rates and treatment effects. Patients with diabetes had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities (eg, hypertension, obesity) and increased incidence of cardiovascular events. Adjusted HRs for events in people with versus without diabetes were 1.34 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.50) for the primary outcome, 1.21 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.75) for stroke, 1.51 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.99) for MI, 1.17 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.31) for heart failure hospitalisation and 1.06 (95% CI 0.56 to 2.01) for major bleeding. Rivaroxaban had no significant effect on event-rates in patients with and without diabetes (all interaction p values >0.05). Low-dose rivaroxaban was associated with an overall reduction in ischaemic stroke (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95), with no apparent subgroup interaction according to diabetes status (p-int=0.93).. In COMMANDER-HF a diagnosis of diabetes conferred higher rates of cardiovascular events that, with exception of ischaemic stroke, was not substantially reduced by rivaroxaban. Rivaroxaban was associated with reduced risk of ischaemic stroke for patients with and without diabetes.. NCT01877915; Post-results.

Topics: Brain Ischemia; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Myocardial Infarction; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the presence of heart failure (HF) is associated with poor outcomes including a high-risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events. Identifying patients without AF who are at high-risk of developing this arrhythmia has important clinical implications.. To develop a risk score to identify HF patients at high risk of developing AF.. The COMMANDER-HF trial enrolled 5022 patients with HF and a LVEF ≤ 40%, history of coronary artery disease, and absence of AF at baseline (confirmed with an electrocardiogram). Patients were randomized to either rivaroxaban (2.5 mg bid) or placebo. New-onset AF was confirmed by the investigator at study visits.. 241 (4.8%) patients developed AF during the follow-up (median 21 months). Older age (≥ 65 years), LVEF < 35%, history of PCI or CABG, White race, SBP < 110 mmHg, and higher BMI (≥ 25 kg/m. A well-calibrated risk-score identified patients at risk of new-onset AF in the COMMANDER-HF trial. Patients who developed AF had a higher risk of subsequent death. Risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with HFrEF and coronary artery disease.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Electrocardiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban

Patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LE-PAD) experience an increased risk of major vascular events. There is limited information on what clinical features of symptomatic LE-PAD prognosticate major vascular events and whether patients at high risk have a greater absolute benefit from low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin.. To quantify the risk of major vascular events and investigate the response to treatment with low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin among patients with symptomatic LE-PAD based on clinical presentation and comorbidities.. This is a subanalysis of a previously reported subgroup of patients with symptomatic LE-PAD who were enrolled in a large, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies [COMPASS]) in 602 centers in 33 countries from March 2013 to January 2020. Data analysis was completed from May 2016 to June 2020.. A combination of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone.. Thirty-month incidence risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE) including major vascular amputation, and bleeding.. The COMPASS trial enrolled 4129 patients with symptomatic LE-PAD (mean [SD] age, 66.8 [8.8] years; 2932 men [71.0%]). The 30-month Kaplan-Meier incidence risk of MACE or MALE, including major amputation, was 22.6% in those with prior amputation (this outcome was observed in 54 patients), 17.6% (n = 15) in those with Fontaine III or IV symptoms, and 11.8% (n = 142) in those with previous peripheral artery revascularization, classifying these features as high-risk limb presentations. The 30-month incidence risk of MACE or MALE, including major amputation, was 14.1% (n = 118) in those with kidney dysfunction, 13.5% (n = 67) in those with heart failure, 13.4% (n = 199) in those with diabetes, and 12.8% (n = 222) in those with polyvascular disease, classifying these features as high-risk comorbidities. Among patients with either high-risk limb presentations or high-risk comorbidities, treatment with rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone was associated with an estimated 4.2% (95% CI, 1.9%-6.2%) absolute risk reduction for MACE or MALE, including major amputation, at 30 months. Although the estimated absolute risk increase of major bleeding was higher with rivaroxaban and aspirin in combination than aspirin alone (2.0% [95% CI, 0.5%-3.9%]) for patients with either high-risk limb presentation or high-risk comorbidity, the estimated absolute risk increase of fatal or critical organ bleeding was low in this high-risk group (0.4% [95% CI, 0.2%-1.8%]), such that the net clinical benefit was estimated to be 3.2% (95% CI, 0.6%-5.3%).. Patients with LE-PAD with high-risk limb presentations or high-risk comorbidities had a high incidence of major vascular events. For these patients, treatment with rivaroxaban and aspirin in combination compared with aspirin alone led to a large absolute reduction in vascular risk.

Topics: Aged; Amputation, Surgical; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prognosis; Renal Insufficiency; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke

The combination of 2.5 mg rivaroxaban twice daily and 100 mg aspirin once daily compared with 100 mg aspirin once daily reduces major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD).. The aim of this work was to report the effects of the combination on overall and cause-specific mortality.. The COMPASS trial enrolled 27,395 patients of whom 18,278 were randomized to the combination (n = 9,152) or aspirin alone (n = 9,126). Deaths were adjudicated by a committee blinded to treatment allocation. Previously identified high-risk baseline features were polyvascular disease, chronic kidney disease, mild or moderate heart failure, and diabetes.. During a median of 23 months of follow-up (maximum 47 months), 313 patients (3.4%) allocated to the combination and 378 patients (4.1%) allocated to aspirin alone died (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.96; P = 0.01). Compared with aspirin, the combination reduced CV death (160 [1.7%] vs 203 [2.2%]; HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64-0.96; P = 0.02) but not non-CV death. There were fewer deaths following MI, stroke, and CV procedures, as well as fewer sudden cardiac, other, and unknown causes of CV deaths and coronary heart disease deaths. Patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 or 4 high-risk features at baseline had 4.2, 4.8, 25.0, and 53.9 fewer deaths, respectively, per 1000 patients treated for 30 months.. The combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin reduced overall and CV mortality with consistent reductions in cause specific CV mortality in patients with chronic CAD or PAD. The absolute mortality benefits are greater with increasing baseline risk. (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulant Strategies [COMPASS]; NCT01776424).

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index

This study investigated the effects of a mid-trial protocol amendment requiring elevated natriuretic peptides for inclusion in the COMMANDER-HF (A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Reducing the Risk of Death, Myocardial Infarction, or Stroke in Participants with Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Following an Episode of Decompensated Heart Failure) trial.. Heart failure (HF) trials that select patients based on history of HF hospitalization alone are susceptible to regional variations in event rates. Elevated plasma concentrations of natriuretic peptides (NPs) as selection criteria may help HF ascertainment and risk enrichment. In the COMMANDER-HF trial, B-type natriuretic peptide ≥200 ng/l or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ≥800 ng/l were added to inclusion criteria as a mid-trial protocol amendment, providing a unique case-study of NP-based inclusion criteria.. We compared the baseline characteristics, event rates, and treatment effects for patients enrolled before and after the NP protocol amendment. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Secondary endpoints included HF rehospitalization and cardiovascular death.. A total of 5,022 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and coronary artery disease were included. Compared to patients enrolled before the NP protocol amendment, those enrolled post-amendment (n = 3,867, 77%) were older, more often had diabetes, and had lower values for body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, and estimated glomerular filtration rate, higher heart rate, and higher event rates: primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16 to 1.50), cardiovascular death (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.50), HF rehospitalization (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.49), and major bleeding (HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.65). Differences between pre- and post-amendment rates were confined to and driven by Eastern Europe. This protocol amendment did not modify the neutral effect of rivaroxaban on the primary endpoint (p interaction = 0.36) or secondary endpoints.. In a global event-driven trial of rivaroxaban in HF, requiring elevated NPs for inclusion increased event rates allowing earlier completion of the trial but did not modify treatment effect. These data inform future HF trials regarding the expected impact of NP-based inclusion criteria on patient characteristics and event rates. (COMMANDER HF [A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Reducing the Risk of Death, Myocardial Infarction, or Stroke in Participants With Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Following an Episode of Decompensated Heart Failure] NCT01877915).

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Global Health; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptides; Patient Selection; Prognosis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke Volume; Survival Rate; Ventricular Function, Left

Stroke is often a devastating event among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection (HFrEF). In COMMANDER HF, rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. did not reduce the composite of first occurrence of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction compared with placebo in patients with HFrEF, coronary artery disease (CAD), and sinus rhythm. We now examine the incidence, timing, type, severity, and predictors of stroke or a transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and seek to establish the net clinical benefit of treatment with low-dose rivaroxaban.. In this double-blind, randomized trial, 5022 patients who had HFrEF(≤40%), elevated natriuretic peptides, CAD, and who were in sinus rhythm were treated with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. or placebo in addition to antiplatelet therapy, after an episode of worsening HF. The primary neurological outcome for this post hoc analysis was time to first event of any stroke or TIA. Over a median follow-up of 20.5 (25th-75th percentiles 20.0-20.9) months, 150 all-cause stroke (127) or TIA (23) events occurred (ischaemic stroke in 82% and haemorrhagic stroke in 11% of stroke events). Overall, 47.5% of first-time strokes were either disabling (16.5%) or fatal (31%). Prior stroke, low body mass index, geographic region, and the CHA2DS2-VASc score were predictors of stroke/TIA. Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the primary neurological endpoint of all-cause stroke or TIA compared with placebo by 32% (1.29 events vs. 1.90 events per 100 patient-years), adjusted for the time from index HF event to randomization and stratified by geographic region (adjusted hazard ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.94), with a number needed to treat of 164 patients per year to prevent one stroke/TIA event. The principal safety endpoint of fatal bleeding or bleeding into a critical space, occurred at a similar rate on rivaroxaban and placebo (0.44 events vs. 0.55 events per 100 patient-years).. Patients with HFrEF and CAD are at risk for stroke or TIA in the period following an episode of worsening heart failure in the absence of atrial fibrillation. Most strokes are of ischaemic origin and nearly half are either disabling or fatal. Rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg b.i.d. reduced rates of stroke or TIA compared with placebo in this population.. COMMANDER HF (A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Reducing the Risk of Death, Myocardial Infarction, or Stroke in Participants with Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Following an Episode of Decompensated Heart Failure); ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01877915.

Topics: Aged; Brain Ischemia; Case-Control Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Placebos; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Patient Readmission; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Whether anticoagulation benefits patients with heart failure (HF) in sinus rhythm is uncertain. The COMMANDER HF randomized clinical trial evaluated the effects of adding low-dose rivaroxaban to antiplatelet therapy in patients with recent worsening of chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction, coronary artery disease (CAD), and sinus rhythm. Although the primary end point of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke did not differ between rivaroxaban and placebo, there were numerical advantages favoring rivaroxaban for myocardial infarction and stroke.. To examine whether low-dose rivaroxaban was associated with reduced thromboembolic events in patients enrolled in the COMMANDER HF trial.. Post hoc analysis of the COMMANDER HF multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with CAD and worsening HF. The trial randomized 5022 patients postdischarge from a hospital or outpatient clinic after treatment for worsening HF between September 2013 and October 2017. Patients were required to be receiving standard care for HF and CAD and were excluded for a medical condition requiring anticoagulation or a bleeding history. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Analysis was conducted from June 2018 and January 2019.. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 2.5 mg of rivaroxaban given orally twice daily or placebo in addition to their standard therapy.. For this post hoc analysis, a thromboembolic composite was defined as either (1) myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, sudden/unwitnessed death, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, or symptomatic deep venous thrombosis or (2) all of the previous components except sudden/unwitnessed deaths because not all of these are caused by thromboembolic events.. Of 5022 patients, 3872 (77.1%) were men, and the overall mean (SD) age was 66.4 (10.2) years. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 19.6 (11.7-30.8) months, fewer patients assigned to rivaroxaban compared with placebo had a thromboembolic event including sudden/unwitnessed deaths: 328 (13.1%) vs 390 (15.5%) (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.96; P = .01). When sudden/unwitnessed deaths were excluded, the results analyzing thromboembolic events were similar: 153 (6.1%) vs 190 patients (7.6%) with an event (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98; P = .04).. In this study, thromboembolic events occurred frequently in patients with HF, CAD, and sinus rhythm. Rivaroxaban may reduce the risk of thromboembolic events in this population, but these events are not the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with recent worsening of HF for which rivaroxaban had no effect. While consistent with other studies, these results require confirmation in prospective randomized clinical trials.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01877915.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Chronic Disease; Coronary Artery Disease; Death, Sudden; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proportional Hazards Models; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Thienopyridines; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease and history of heart failure (HF) are at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. We explored the effects of rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in these patients.. The COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) randomized 27 395 participants with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily alone, or aspirin 100 mg alone. Patients with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV HF or left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) <30% were excluded. The primary major adverse cardiovascular events outcome comprised cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding using modified International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Investigators recorded a history of HF and EF at baseline, if available. We examined the effects of rivaroxaban on major adverse cardiovascular events and major bleeding in patients with or without a history of HF and an EF <40% or ≥40% at baseline.. Of the 5902 participants (22%) with a history of HF, 4971 (84%) had EF recorded at baseline, and 12% had EF <40%. Rivaroxaban and aspirin had similar relative reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events compared with aspirin in participants with HF (5.5% versus 7.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.86) and those without HF (3.8% versus 4.7%; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.93; P for interaction 0.28) but larger absolute risk reduction in those with HF (HF absolute risk reduction 2.4%, number needed to treat=42; no HF absolute risk reduction 1.0%, number needed to treat=103). The primary major adverse cardiovascular events outcome was not statistically different between those with EF <40% (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.55-1.42) and ≥40% (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98; P for interaction 0.36). The excess hazard for major bleeding was not different in participants with HF (2.5% versus 1.8%; HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.88-2.09) than in those without HF (3.3% versus 1.9%; HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.45-2.21; P for interaction 0.26). There were no significant differences in the primary outcomes with rivaroxaban alone.. In patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease and a history of mild or moderate HF, combination rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone produces similar relative but larger absolute benefits than in those without HF.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01776424.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Chronic Disease; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban

Heart failure is associated with activation of thrombin-related pathways, which predicts a poor prognosis. We hypothesized that treatment with rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, could reduce thrombin generation and improve outcomes for patients with worsening chronic heart failure and underlying coronary artery disease.. In this double-blind, randomized trial, 5022 patients who had chronic heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less, coronary artery disease, and elevated plasma concentrations of natriuretic peptides and who did not have atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily or placebo in addition to standard care after treatment for an episode of worsening heart failure. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The principal safety outcome was fatal bleeding or bleeding into a critical space with a potential for causing permanent disability.. Over a median follow-up period of 21.1 months, the primary end point occurred in 626 (25.0%) of 2507 patients assigned to rivaroxaban and in 658 (26.2%) of 2515 patients assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.05; P=0.27). No significant difference in all-cause mortality was noted between the rivaroxaban group and the placebo group (21.8% and 22.1%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.10). The principal safety outcome occurred in 18 patients who took rivaroxaban and in 23 who took placebo (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.49; P=0.48).. Rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily was not associated with a significantly lower rate of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke than placebo among patients with worsening chronic heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary artery disease, and no atrial fibrillation. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; COMMANDER HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01877915 .).

Topics: Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Patient Readmission; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Treatment Failure

Patients with both acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and congestive heart failure are at an increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events attributed in part to both excess thrombin generation and impaired fibrinolysis. We hypothesized that patients with the overlap of ACS and CHF would thus derive particular benefit from antithrombotic therapy with rivaroxaban. ATLAS-ACS-2 Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-51 was a double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial that randomized patients within 7 days of an ACS event to standard of care plus either rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID, 5 mg BID, or placebo (n = 15,526). In this post hoc subgroup analysis, subjects with a history of CHF at randomization (n = 1,694) were evaluated. Among subjects with a history of CHF, both rivaroxaban doses reduced the primary composite end point of CV death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (2.5 mg BID vs placebo: hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.42, 0.81), p = 0.001; 5 mg BID vs placebo: HR 0.61, 95% CI (0.44, 0.84), p = 0.002; p interaction = 0.006). Both doses of rivaroxaban reduced CV mortality (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID vs placebo: 4.1% vs 9.0%, HR 0.45, 95% CI [0.27, 0.74], p = 0.002; rivaroxaban 5 mg BID vs placebo: 5.8% vs 9.0%, HR 0.62, 95% CI [0.40, 0.96], p = 0.031) as well as all-cause mortality. There was no significant increase in noncoronary artery bypass graft-related Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major bleeding with either dose of rivaroxaban as compared with placebo (rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID = 0.4% vs rivaroxaban 5 mg BID = 1.1% vs placebo = 0.5%). Rivaroxaban also did not increase either intracranial hemorrhage or fatal bleeding. In conclusion, in ACS subjects with a history of CHF, secondary prevention with rivaroxaban reduced the composite of CV death, myocardial infarction, or stroke without an increase in noncoronary artery bypass graft-related major bleeding. These findings require further prospective evaluation in an adequately powered phase 3 study.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Cause of Death; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thrombolytic Therapy; Treatment Outcome; United States

Thrombin is a critical element of crosstalk between pathways contributing to worsening of established heart failure (HF). The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg bid compared with placebo (with standard care) after an exacerbation of HF in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HF-rEF) and documented coronary artery disease.. This is an international prospective, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven study of approximately 5000 patients for a targeted 984 events. Patients must have a recent symptomatic exacerbation of HF, increased plasma concentrations of natriuretic peptides (B-type natriuretic peptide ≥200 pg/mL or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ≥800 pg/mL), with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% and coronary artery disease. Patients requiring anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation or other conditions will be excluded. After an index event (overnight hospitalization, emergency department or observation unit admission, or unscheduled outpatient parenteral treatment for worsening HF), patients will be randomized 1:1 to rivaroxaban or placebo (with standard of care). The primary efficacy outcome event is a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke. The principal safety outcome events are the composite of fatal bleeding or bleeding into a critical space with potential permanent disability, bleeding events requiring hospitalization and major bleeding events according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis bleeding criteria.. COMMANDER HF is the first prospective study of a target-specific oral antithrombotic agent in HF. It will provide important information regarding rivaroxaban use following an HF event in an HF-rEF patient population with coronary artery disease.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Coronary Artery Disease; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Research Design; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Survival Rate

Whether heart failure (HF) increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is not well established. In the phase III MAGELLAN (Multicenter, rAndomized, parallel Group Efficacy and safety study for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medically iLL patients comparing rivaroxabAN with enoxaparin) trial, extended-duration rivaroxaban was compared with standard-duration enoxaparin followed by placebo for VTE prevention in 8101 hospitalized acutely ill patients with or without HF. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the relationship between HF severity and the risk of VTE in MAGELLAN patients.. Hospitalized patients diagnosed with HF were included according to New York Heart Association class III or IV at admission (n=2593). HF severity was determined by N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma concentrations (median 1904 pg/mL). Baseline plasma D-dimer concentrations ranged from 0.6 to 1.7 μg/L for the less and more severe HF subgroups. Patients with more severe HF had a greater incidence of VTE versus patients with less severe HF, with a significant trend up to Day 10 (4.3% versus 2.2%; P=0.0108) and Day 35 (7.2% versus 4.1%; P=0.0150). Multivariable analysis confirmed that NT-proBNP concentration was associated with VTE risk up to Day 10 (P=0.017) and D-dimer concentration with VTE risk up to Day 35 (P=0.005). The association between VTE risk and HF severity that was observed in the enoxaparin/placebo group was not seen in the extended-duration rivaroxaban group.. Patients with more severe HF, as defined by high NT-proBNP plasma concentration, were at increased risk of VTE. NT-proBNP may be useful to identify high short-term risk, whereas elevated D-dimer may be suggestive of high midterm risk.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00571649.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Multivariate Analysis; Predictive Value of Tests; Primary Prevention; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

In Rivaroxaban Once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF), rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events and significantly reduced intracranial bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We explore the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients with heart failure (HF).. A total of 9033 (63.7%) patients had HF. The primary efficacy analysis was rates of stroke or systemic embolism (per 100 patient-years) by intention to treat. The safety outcomes were major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke during treatment. Patients with HF were younger (72 versus 74 years), more likely to have persistent atrial fibrillation (83.0% versus 77.6%), and had higher mean CHADS2 scores (3.7 versus 3.1). The efficacy of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was similar in patients with HF (1.90 versus 2.09) and without HF (2.10 versus 2.54; P-interaction=0.62). The risk of major or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding with rivaroxaban was similar to warfarin in patients with HF (14.22 versus 14.02) and without HF (16.12 versus 15.35; P-interaction=0.99). A reduction in hemorrhagic stroke was observed with rivaroxaban in patients with HF as in the overall trial (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.76; P-interaction=0.067). Among patients with HF, the efficacy of rivaroxaban was similar, irrespective of ejection fraction <40 or ≥ 40% (P-interaction=0.38), New York Heart Association class I-II versus III-IV (P-interaction=0.68), HF preserved or reduced ejection fraction (P-interaction=0.35), or CHADS2 score 2 versus ≥ 3 (P-interaction=0.48).. Treatment-related outcomes were similar in patients with and without HF and across HF subgroups. These findings support the use of rivaroxaban as an alternative to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and HF. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00403767.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Heart failure (HF) is associated with a hypercoagulable state that predisposes to thromboembolism and anti-coagulation may improve clinical outcomes. The oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, has not been studied in patients with HF. We hypothesized that rivaroxaban would also reduce biomarkers of hypercoagulability in patients with HF.. This study consisted of two cohorts: Cohort 1, open-label, actively controlled with enoxaparin 40 mg once daily, included 8 patients with acute decompensated HF; Cohort 2, double-blind and placebo-controlled, included 18 patients with stable, severe New York Heart Association Class III/IV HF.. The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of rivaroxaban were similar across both cohorts. Biomarker assessments were performed in Cohort 2; prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1.2) mean concentration decreased by 2.7 ng/ml over 7 days with rivaroxaban, and increased by 11.6 ng/ml with placebo, an absolute difference of 14.3 ng/ml (p = 0.0009). A non-significant reduction in rate of increase of D-dimer (DD) and thrombin-anti-thrombin complex (TAT) levels with rivaroxaban was observed over 7 days (p = 0.31 and p = 0.77, respectively).. Rivaroxaban has similar PK/PD in patients with either acute or chronic HF. In vivo, hypercoagulability biomarkers appear to increase over time. Rivaroxaban reversed this trend for F1.2, and may reduce the rate of increase of DD and TAT in patients with stable, severe HF.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombin III; Biomarkers; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Peptide Fragments; Peptide Hydrolases; Prothrombin; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombophilia

Patients with acute medical illnesses are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended in these patients but questions remain regarding the optimal duration of therapy. The aim of this study is to determine whether oral rivaroxaban is non-inferior to standard-duration (approximately 10 days) subcutaneous (s.c.) enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE in acutely ill medical patients, and whether extended-duration (approximately 5 weeks) rivaroxaban is superior to standard-duration enoxaparin. Patients aged 40 years or older and hospitalized for various acute medical illnesses with risk factors for VTE randomly receive either s.c. enoxaparin 40 mg once daily (od) for 10 ± 4 days or oral rivaroxaban 10 mg od for 35 ± 4 days. The primary efficacy outcomes are the composite of asymptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), symptomatic DVT, symptomatic non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and VTE-related death up to day 10 + 4 and up to day 35 + 4. The primary safety outcome is the composite of treatment-emergent major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. As of July 2010, 8,101 patients from 52 countries have been randomized. These patients have a broad range of medical conditions: approximately one-third were diagnosed with acute heart failure, just under one-third were diagnosed with acute infectious disease, and just under one-quarter were diagnosed with acute respiratory insufficiency. MAGELLAN will determine the efficacy, safety, and pharmacological profile of oral rivaroxaban for the prevention of VTE in a diverse population of medically ill patients and the potential of extended-duration therapy to reduce incidence of VTE.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Infections; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pulmonary Embolism; Respiratory Insufficiency; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Heart failure (HF) is a critical complication in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM). Recent preclinical studies suggested that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) can potentially suppress the progression of cardiac fibrosis and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Whether different oral anticoagulants influence the risk of HF in older adults with AF and DM is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of HF in elderly patients with AF and DM who were administered NOACs or warfarin.. A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted based on claims data from the entire Taiwanese population. Target trial emulation design was applied to strengthen causal inference using observational data. Patients aged  ≥ 65 years with AF and DM on NOAC or warfarin treatment between 2012 and 2019 were included and followed up until 2020. The primary outcome was newly diagnosed HF. Propensity score-based fine stratification weightings were used to balance patient characteristics between NOAC and warfarin groups. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models.. The study included a total of 24,835 individuals (19,710 NOAC and 5,125 warfarin users). Patients taking NOACs had a significantly lower risk of HF than those taking warfarin (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.86, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses for individual NOACs suggested that dabigatran (HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.93, p < 0.001), rivaroxaban (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.86, p < 0.001), apixaban (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.90, p < 0.001), and edoxaban (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86, p < 0.001) were associated with lower risks of HF than warfarin. The findings were consistent regardless of age and sex subgroups and were more prominent in those with high medication possession ratios. Several sensitivity analyses further supported the robustness of our findings.. This nationwide cohort study demonstrated that elderly patients with AF and DM taking NOACs had a lower risk of incident HF than those taking warfarin. Our findings suggested that NOACs may be the preferred oral anticoagulant treatment when considering the prevention of heart failure in this vulnerable population. Future research is warranted to elucidate causation and investigate the underlying mechanisms.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are common and coexistent conditions.. To investigate the adverse events and mortality risk factors in patients with AF and HF treated with rivaroxaban in Spain.. Multicenter, prospective and observational study with a follow-up of 2 years, that included adults, with a diagnosis of nonvalvular AF and chronic HF, anticoagulated with rivaroxaban at least 4 months before being enrolled.. Among patients with HF and AF anticoagulated with rivaroxaban, incidences of thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications were low. The most important factor for improving survival was compliance with HF drugs, what strengths the need for early treatment with HF disease-modifying therapy and anticoagulation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amyloidosis; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiomyopathies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

The current treatment paradigm for atrial fibrillation (AF) prioritizes rate control over rhythm control; however, rhythm control has shown benefits over other AF strategies. This study compares the outcomes of rivaroxaban with and without concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), using propensity score matching to correct for statistical effects of baseline discrepancies. This multi-center retrospective study included 1,477 patients with non-permanent AF who took rivaroxaban for at least one month between 2011 and 2016 and had not received catheter ablation. Concomitant AAD use was compared against clinical outcome endpoints for effectiveness, safety, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Associations with concomitant AAD use were evaluated using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. Patients were divided into two matched groups: rivaroxaban alone (n = 739) and with concomitant AADs (n = 738). The cumulative incidences of safety (p = 0.308), effectiveness (p = 0.583), and MACE (p = 0.754) were similar between the two groups, and multivariate analysis showed no significant differences. The new thromboembolism and all-cause death rates were higher in rivaroxaban alone (2.7% vs 0.8%, p = 0.005; and 10% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.032, respectively). The heart failure readmission rate was higher in the concomitant-AAD group (8.4% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.003). The concomitant use of rivaroxaban with AADs appears to be well-tolerated, with lower rates of thromboembolism and all-cause death, but is associated with more occurrences of congestive heart failure.

Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the presence of heart failure (HF) on the clinical profile and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) anticoagulated with rivaroxaban.. Observational and non-interventional study that included AF adults recruited from 79 Spanish centers, anticoagulated with rivaroxaban ≥ 6 months before inclusion. Data were analyzed according to baseline HF status.. Out of 1,433 patients, 326 (22.7%) had HF at baseline. Compared to patients without HF, HF patients were older (75.3 ± 9.9 vs. 73.8 ± 9.6 years; p = 0.01), had more diabetes (36.5% vs. 24.3%; p < 0.01), coronary artery disease (28.2% vs. 12.9%; p < 0.01), renal insufficiency (31.7% vs. 22.6%; p = 0.01), higher CHA2DS2-VASc (4.5 ± 1.6 vs. 3.2 ± 1.4; p < 0.01) and HAS-BLED (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 1.5 ± 1.0; p < 0.01). After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, among HF patients, annual rates of stroke/systemic embolism/transient ischemic attack, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (non-fatal myocardial infarction, revascularization and cardiovascular death), cardiovascular death, and major bleeding were 1.2%, 3.0%, 2.0%, and 1.4%, respectively. Compared to those patients without HF, HF patients had greater annual rates of MACE (3.0% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.01) and cardiovascular death (2.0% vs. 0.2%; p < 0.01), without significant differences regarding other outcomes, including thromboembolic or bleeding events. Previous HF was an independent predictor of MACE (odds ratio 3.4; 95% confidence interval 1.6-7.3; p = 0.002) but not for thromboembolic events or major bleeding.. Among AF patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban, HF patients had a worse clinical profile and a higher MACE risk and cardiovascular mortality. HF was independently associated with the development of MACE, but not with thromboembolic events or major bleeding.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which includes coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Antiplatelet therapy has long been the mainstay of antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of first-ever and recurrent ASCVD events. More recently, however, randomized trials have demonstrated the benefits and cost-effectiveness of a dual pathway inhibition (DPI) strategy in acute and chronic ASCVD. When used in combination, aspirin and low-dose rivaroxaban work synergistically to inhibit platelet activation and thrombin generation, thereby preventing thrombus formation. Among patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS), those with positive cardiac biomarkers or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or a history of heart failure derive the greatest absolute benefits. Among patients with chronic ASCVD, those with involvement of two or more vascular beds, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or diabetes derive the greatest absolute benefits. Additional trials are underway to assess the impact of DPI therapy in other populations of interest, including patients with ACS at high risk of left ventricular thrombus formation, intracranial atherosclerotic disease with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke, peripheral arterial disease with limiting claudication or post lower extremity revascularization, and advanced chronic kidney disease with ASCVD or risk factors for ASCVD. Further work is required to assess the possible added benefit of combining rivaroxaban with clopidogrel or ticagrelor instead of aspirin.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heart Failure; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Rivaroxaban

The aim: To increase the treatment effectiveness of CHF patients after MI with stenting by using magnesium and potassium salts of gluconic acid, eplerenone, and rivaroxaban in complex therapy.. Materials and methods: The research was performed at the premises of Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Clinical Cardiology Centre, Ukraine. 84 patients with CHF after past MI were examined.. Results and conclusions: A more pronounced anti-ischemic effect has been linked to the use of combination therapy with rivaroxaban on the background of basic therapy (BT) in patients with CHF after MI, compared with the use of magnesium and potassium salts of gluconic acid or eplerenone. The use of eplerenone in the complex treatment of these patients on the background of BT has been proven to provide a pronounced reverse remodeling of the left myocardium in the postinfarction period.

Topics: Eplerenone; Gluconates; Heart Failure; Humans; Magnesium; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardium; Potassium; Rivaroxaban; Salts; Spironolactone

D-dimer is a marker of fibrin degradation that reflects intravascular coagulation. Therefore, plasma concentrations of D-dimer might predict thromboembolic risk and rivaroxaban treatment effect. The aims of this study were to investigate the association between D-dimer levels and the risk of stroke and other thrombotic, bleeding and fatal events, and whether D-dimer concentrations could predict rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (vs. placebo) effect in patients enrolled in the COMMANDER-HF trial who were in sinus rhythm, had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and coronary artery disease.. In COMMANDER-HF, rivaroxaban reduced the risk of stroke but the benefit may be confined to patients with D-dimer concentrations above 515 ng/mL. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Heart Failure; Humans; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left

To determine the association between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use and risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. This study is a single-center prospective observational cohort study including 2366 outpatients with non-valvular AF on treatment with DOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) from February 2008 for patients on VKA and September 2013 for patients on novel oral anticoagulants. The primary endpoint was the incidence of MACE including fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac revascularization, and cardiovascular death.. The mean age was 75.1±9.0 years; 44.7% were women. During a mean follow-up of 33.3±21.9 months (6567 patients/years) 133 MACEs occurred (2.03%/year): 79 MI/cardiac revascularization and 54 cardiovascular deaths. Of these, 101 were on VKAs (2.42%/year) and 32 on DOACs (1.34%/year; log-rank test P=.040). This difference was evident also considering MI alone (1.53%/year and 0.63%/year in the VKA and DOAC group, respectively, log-rank test P=.009). At multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, use of DOACs was associated with a lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio, 0.636; 95% CI, 0.417 to 0.970; P=.036) and MI (hazard ratio, 0.497; 95% CI, 0.276 to 0.896; p=.020). Sensitivity analysis showed that this association was consistent in younger patients (<75 years), in patients with anemia, and in those without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure. We also found that both dabigatran and apixaban/rivaroxaban were associated with a lower rate of MACE, with similar efficacy between full and low doses.. DOACs are associated with a lower risk of MACE in patients with AF independently from dosage.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation are an important atrial fibrillation subgroup in which direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have not been adequately studied in real-world settings. Since DOACs rely on renal elimination and renal dysfunction is prevalent in patients with heart failure, their use may increase bleeding risk, negating some of their advantage over warfarin.. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked Veterans Administration databases of patients with heart failure newly started on warfarin or DOACs for atrial fibrillation from October 2010 to August 2017 (23 635 warfarin, 25 823 DOAC). Outcomes included time to first bleeding, stroke, and death using Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weighting.. Total bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.56-0.68]), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40-0.61]), and death (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.71-0.78]) were lower with DOAC than warfarin, and with apixaban and dabigatran, but not rivaroxaban. Moderate/severe chronic kidney disease was common (48.7%); moderate chronic kidney disease was associated with increased bleeding with DOACs but not warfarin. However, death and bleeding remained lower with DOACs than warfarin across all renal function levels and clinical subgroups. A >20% transient/persistent decline in renal function occurred in 53% of DOAC-treated patients at some point during follow-up, would have required dose reduction in 10.5% of patients, and was associated with increased bleeding. Dose adjustments were made more often, and bleeding and death were lower in patients seen by pharmacists or anticoagulation clinics. There were significant between-site variations in DOAC dosing.. DOACs overall, apixaban, and dabigatran, but not rivaroxaban, were associated with less total bleeding and death than warfarin in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation at all levels of renal function. Renal function decline resulted in increased bleeding in patients with DOACs. DOAC dose adjustment was often indicated, associated with increased bleeding when not adjusted, emphasizing the need for closer monitoring in these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Heart Failure; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

This study sought to compare patient characteristics, outcomes, and treatment effects among regions in the COMMANDER-HF trial.. Globalization of cardiovascular trials increases generalizability. However, regional differences may also introduce heterogeneity in results.. Incidence rates and interactions with treatment were recorded in pre-specified regions: Eastern Europe, Western Europe and South Africa, North America, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.. In the COMMANDER-HF study, patients from Eastern Europe had a lower risk profile and fewer cardiovascular and bleeding events, possibly related to lower treatment adherence. Those differences might have influenced the effect of rivaroxaban therapy. (A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Reducing the Risk of Death, Myocardial Infarction or Stroke in Participants With Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease Following an Episode of Decompensated Heart Failure [COMMANDER HF]; NCT01877915).

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Heart Failure; Humans; Latin America; Patient Selection; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume

Atorvastatin and direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (xabans) are frequently co-administrated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, no studies investigating the possibility of the pharmacologic interaction between these agents have been conducted. The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine the impact of atorvastatin therapy on anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with AF. We enrolled 115 AF patients on long-term rivaroxaban (52 patients) and long-term apixaban (63 patients) therapy. Long-term atorvastatin (40 mg once daily) was administrated to 28 rivaroxaban-treated patients and to 28 apixaban-treated patients. Trough and peak samples were tested for anti-Xa activity with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis. For rivaroxaban, there were no significant differences in trough activity (45.5 ± 39.5 ng/ml vs. 46.2 ± 30.1 ng/ml; p = .34) and peak anti-Xa activity (179.2 ± 108.8 ng/ml vs. 208.1 ± 104.1 ng/ml; p = .94) between atorvastatin-treated patients and those without atorvastatin. Similarly, atorvastatin did not impact the trough activity (127.7 ± 71.1 ng/ml vs. 100.8 ± 61.1 ng/ml; p = .12) or peak anti-Xa activity (213.8 ± 103.6 ng/ml vs. 179.3 ± 72.9 ng/ml; p = .14) among apixaban-treated patients with AF. This observational study did not show a significant impact of atorvastatin on trough and peak anti-Xa activity in xabans-treated patients with AF.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atorvastatin; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombosis

2019 has continued to bring important progress in all areas of internal medicine, impacting our daily practice. From new indications for SGLT2 inhibitors and rivaroxaban, to antibiotic duration for Gram negative bacteriemia, passing by the delay for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation or for beginning sacubitril/valsartan after stabilization of a cardiac failure, internal medicine journals are full of novelties. Every year, the chief residents of the CHUV internal medicine ward meet up to share their readings: here is their selection of eleven articles, chosen, summarized and commented for you.. L’année 2019 a vu d’importants progrès dans tous les domaines de la médecine interne, avec un impact important sur notre pratique quotidienne hospitalière. Des nouvelles indications pour les inhibiteurs du SLGT2 et le rivaroxaban, à la durée du traitement des bactériémies à Gram négatif en passant par le délai pour la cardioversion d’une fibrillation auriculaire inaugurale ou celui pour introduire du sacubitril/valsartan après stabilisation d’une insuffisance cardiaque, les nouveautés abondent dans la littérature. Chaque année, les chefs de clinique du Service de médecine interne du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) se réunissent pour partager leurs lectures: voici une sélection de onze articles choisis, revus et commentés pour vous.

Topics: Aminobutyrates; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Heart Failure; Humans; Internal Medicine; Periodicals as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome

Warfarin is standard anticoagulation therapy for patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD). However, warfarin requires regular monitoring and dosage adjustments and fails for many patients, causing thromboembolic and bleeding events. Factor Xa inhibitors have been shown to be noninferior to warfarin in preventing strokes and are associated with less intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation. We evaluated treatment safety and effectiveness in CF-LVAD patients who switched from warfarin to a factor Xa inhibitor (apixaban or rivaroxaban) after warfarin failure.. This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients treated between 2008 and 2018. We assessed the occurrence of stroke, non-central nervous system (CNS) embolism, pump thrombosis, and major gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage during therapy.. Factor Xa inhibitors may be viable treatment options for CF-LVAD patients for whom warfarin therapy has failed. Large prospective studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Heart-Assist Devices; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

We describe the case of an 86-year-old man with a background of severe left ventricular dysfunction and ischaemic cardiomyopathy who, having been optimised for heart failure therapy in hospital, unexpectedly deteriorated again with hypotension and progressive renal failure over the course of 2 days. Common causes of decompensation were ruled out and a bedside echocardiogram unexpectedly diagnosed new pericardial effusion with tamponade physiology. The patient underwent urgent pericardiocentesis and 890 mL of haemorrhagic fluid was drained. Common causes for haemopericardium were ruled out, and the spontaneous haemopericardium was thought to be related to introduction of rivaroxaban anticoagulation. The patient made a full recovery and was well 2 months following discharge. This case highlights the challenges of diagnosing cardiac tamponade in the presence of more common disorders that share similar non-specific clinical features. In addition, this case adds to growing evidence that therapy with direct oral anticoagulants can be complicated by spontaneous haemopericardium, especially when coadministered with other agents that affect clotting, renal dysfunction and cytochrome P3A5 inhibitors.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Cardiac Tamponade; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Diagnosis, Differential; Drainage; Echocardiography; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypotension; Male; Myocardial Ischemia; Pericardial Effusion; Rivaroxaban; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Topics: Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Heart Failure; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Blood Coagulation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Progression; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Readmission; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Disease; Anemia, Iron-Deficiency; Anticoagulants; Cardiotonic Agents; Case-Control Studies; Diuretics; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Aneurysm; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Iron; Myocardial Infarction; Pacemaker, Artificial; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Placebos; Portraits as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Thrombosis; Urea

Heart failure (HF) is a common co-morbidity in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients and a potent risk factor for stroke, bleeding, and a decreased time-in-therapeutic range with warfarin. We assessed the real-world effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin in NVAF patients with co-morbid HF.. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin are sustained in NVAF patients with co-morbid HF treated in routine practice. The general consistency between this real-world study and those from phase III randomized trial data of rivaroxaban should provide additional reassurance to clinicians regarding the use of rivaroxaban in NVAF patients with HF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Incidence; Male; Medicare; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Rivaroxaban

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are at least as efficacious and safe as warfarin among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients; limited evidence is available regarding NVAF patients with heart failure (HF). US Medicare enrollees with NVAF and HF initiating DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) or warfarin were selected. Propensity score matching and Cox models were used to estimate the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) comparing DOACs versus warfarin and DOACs versus DOACs. We identified 10,570 apixaban-warfarin, 4,297 dabigatran-warfarin, 15,712 rivaroxaban-warfarin, 4,263 apixaban-dabigatran, 10,477 apixaban-rivaroxaban, and 4,297 dabigatran-rivaroxaban matched pairs. Compared to warfarin, apixaban had lower rates of stroke/SE (hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = 0.48-0.85), MB (hazard ratio = 0.66, 0.58-0.76), and MACE (hazard ratio = 0.73,0.67-0.79); dabigatran and rivaroxaban had lower rates of MACE (hazard ratio = 0.87,0.77-0.99; hazard ratio = 0.84, 0.79-0.89, respectively). Rivaroxaban had a lower stroke/SE rate (hazard ratio = 0.65, 0.52-0.81) and higher MB rate (hazard ratio = 1.18, 1.08-1.30) versus warfarin. Compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban, apixaban had lower MB (hazard ratio = 0.71, 0.57-0.89; hazard ratio = 0.55, 0.49-0.63) and MACE rates (hazard ratio = 0.80, 0.69-0.93; hazard ratio = 0.86, 0.79-0.94), respectively. All DOACs had lower MACE rates versus warfarin; differences were observed in stroke/SE and MB. Our findings provide insights about OAC therapy among NVAF patients with HF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Medicare; Patient Safety; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Topics: Fibrinolytic Agents; Heart Failure; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis

Despite considerable progress in the field of heart failure about drugs and device therapy, the mortality rate of patients with heart failure remains high. Studies have shown that thromboembolism and stroke are associated with high mortality in patients with heart failure. Although warfarin therapy reduces the rate of ischemic stroke in patients with heart failure, the overall benefit from warfarin in this population seems to be offset by the increased bleeding risk. Thus, whether patients with chronic heart failure might benefit from anticoagulation, especially in patients with sinus rhythm, is still controversial. Rivaroxaban, a new oral anticoagulant, is a selective direct factor Xa inhibitor that is used to reduce thrombin generation, which may bring hope to anticoagulation in patients with heart failure. However, the COMPASS trial and recently published COMMANDER HF trial presented different results. By carefully analyzing 2 clinical trials, we think several factors might explain this different outcome.

Topics: Chronic Disease; Clinical Decision-Making; Evidence-Based Medicine; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Patient Selection; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticoagulants; Coronary Artery Disease; Heart Failure; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Heart Failure; Humans; Rivaroxaban

Adding rivaroxaban to standard therapy in patients with heart failure and no atrial fibrillation did not show any beneficial effect on death risk.

Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Nephritis, Interstitial; Rivaroxaban; Thrombophilia

Sex-specific effectiveness of rivaroxaban (RIVA), dabigatran (DABI), and warfarin in reducing myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and all-cause mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation are not known. We assessed sex-specific associations of RIVA, DABI, or warfarin use with the risk of MI, HF, and all-cause mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation.. Medicare beneficiaries (men: 65 734 [44.8%], women: 81 135 [55.2%]) with atrial fibrillation who initiated oral anticoagulants formed the study cohort. Inpatient admissions for MI, HF, and all-cause mortality were compared between the 3 drugs separately for men and women using 3-way propensity-matched samples. In men, RIVA use was associated with a reduced risk of MI admissions compared with warfarin use (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 [0.38-0.91]), with a trend towards reduced risk compared with DABI use (0.67 [0.44-1.01]). In women, there were no significant differences in the risk of MI admissions across all 3 anticoagulants. In both sexes, RIVA use and DABI use were associated with reduced risk of HF admissions (men: RIVA; 0.75 [0.63-0.89], DABI; 0.81 [0.69-0.96]) (women: RIVA; 0.64 [0.56-0.74], DABI; 0.73 [0.63-0.83]) and all-cause mortality (men: RIVA; 0.66 [0.53-0.81], DABI; 0.75 [0.61-0.93]) (women: RIVA; 0.76 [0.63-0.91], DABI; 0.77 [0.64-0.93]) compared with warfarin use.. RIVA use and DABI use when compared with warfarin use was associated with a reduced risk of HF admissions and all-cause mortality in both sexes. However, reduced risk of MI admissions noted with RIVA use appears to be limited to men.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Chi-Square Distribution; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Medicare; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Admission; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

The new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are used for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and those at risk of deep venous thrombosis. Their rapid onset of action and predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles make them the optimal alternative to warfarin in the treatment of these two categories of patients. Unfortunately, however, NOACs cannot be used in patients with valvular AF or valvular cardiac prostheses. Although mechanical valves are effectively a contraindication to NOAC use due to several pathophysiological mechanisms that promote the use of warfarin rather than NOACs, few data exist regarding the use of such new pharmacological compounds on patients with cardiac biological valves or those who have undergone mitral repair or tubular aortic graft implantation.. Our case series involved 27 patients [mean age 70 ± 10 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 years (doubled), Diabetes mellitus, Stroke/transient ischemic attack (doubled), Vascular disease, Age 65-74 years, Sex category): 6 ± 1.4; and mean HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding, Labile international normalized ratios, Elderly, Drugs or alcohol): 4 ± 1] with AF and biological prostheses, repaired mitral valves, or tubular aortic graft who were treated with the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban due to inefficacy or adverse effects of warfarin.. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 48 ± 9 %, the left atrial diameter was 46.5 ± 7 mm, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was 45 ± 21 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The mean duration of treatment was 15 ± 2 months. No relevant complications or recurrent thromboembolic events occurred. Three patients had recurrent nose bleeding and two had hematuria that led to reduction of the rivaroxaban dose by the treating physician to 15 mg once a day after 4 months of therapy. No further bleeding episode was recorded after escalating the dose.. Rivaroxaban is a valuable treatment option for patients with biological prostheses, repaired mitral valves, or a tubular aortic graft in order to prevent thromboembolic complications.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; International Normalized Ratio; Male; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have varying degrees of renal elimination which may be challenging in patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined the severity and variation in renal impairment, and the proportion of patients requiring NOAC cessation or dose reduction.. A retrospective analysis of patients with HF and AF in the Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity programme was carried out. Trends in renal impairment over 26 months were defined using Cockcroft-Gault (CG), simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was worse at every time point in patients with AF compared with those without AF, the difference being ∼11 mL/min (CG), 9 mL/min (CKD-EPI), and 7 mL/min (MDRD). As renal function declined, CG classified a greater proportion of patients as having moderate or severe CKD and agreement with MDRD/CKD-EPI declined. At least moderate renal impairment was present in a quarter of patients with AF at baseline, a third by study completion, and approaching a half at least once during follow-up. The projected need for NOAC dose reduction was accordingly high, though it varied between individual NOACs due to different criteria for adjustment.. Renal impairment in patients with HF and AF is common, fluctuates, progresses, and frequently mandates NOAC dose reduction, though the need for cessation is rare. Baseline renal function, the method of estimating GFR, and intensity of monitoring should be considered when commencing oral anticoagulation.

Topics: Aged; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Thiazoles

We aimed to investigate the relationship between aspirin use and clinical outcomes in patients enrolled in Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF), in particular, those with known coronary artery disease (CAD).. Patients in ROCKET AF, comparing rivaroxaban and warfarin, were analyzed. Aspirin use was assessed at baseline. Stroke and systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, death, and major or nonmajor clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding were compared between groups. Multivariable modeling was done adjusting for baseline risk factors.. A total of 5,205 (36.5%) patients were receiving aspirin at baseline (mean dose 99.2mg); 30.6% of those had known CAD. Patients receiving aspirin were more likely to have prior myocardial infarction (22% vs 14%; P<.001) and heart failure (68% vs 59%; P<.001). Relative efficacy of rivaroxaban versus warfarin was similar with and without aspirin use for both stroke/systemic embolism (P=.95 for interaction), and major or NMCR bleeding (P=.76 for interaction). After adjustment, aspirin use was associated with similar rates of stroke/systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% CI 0.98-1.37; P=.094) but higher rates of all-cause death (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.13-1.42; P<.0001) and major or NMCR bleeding (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.21-1.43; P<.0001). There was a significant interaction between no CAD at baseline and aspirin for all-cause death (P=.009).. Aspirin use at baseline was associated with an increased risk for bleeding and all-cause death in ROCKET AF, a risk most pronounced in patients without known CAD. Although these findings may reflect unmeasured clinical factors, further investigation is warranted to determine optimal aspirin use in patients with AF.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Drug Therapy, Combination; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulation (NOAC) agents have been approved for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated 'real-world' information on how these drugs are being adopted.. Using Danish nationwide administrative registers, we identified all oral anticoagulation-naïve AF patients initiating oral anticoagulation from 22 August 2011 through 31 October 2013. Using logistic regression analysis, baseline characteristics and temporal utilization trends were compared between initiators of warfarin vs. one of the N OACs: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. We identified 18 611 oral anticoagulation-naïve AF patients of which 9902 (53%) initiated warfarin treatment, 7128 (38%) dabigatran, 1303 (7%) rivaroxaban, and 278 (1%) apixaban. Overall, 40% of newly initiated patients were started on dabigatran within the first 4 months of when the drug came on market. By October, 2013, 40% were being started on warfarin and dabigatran, respectively, and another 20% were started on either rivaroxaban or apixaban. Rivaroxaban and apixaban users generally had a higher predicted risk of stroke and bleeding compared with warfarin and dabigatran users. Older age, female gender, and prior stroke were some of the factors associated with NOAC use vs. warfarin, whereas chronic kidney disease, myocardial infarction, and heart failure showed the opposite association.. Among oral anticoagulation-naïve AF patients initiated on oral anticoagulation in Denmark, warfarin initiation has declined since the introduction of dabigatran in August 2011. Dabigatran is the most frequently used alternative option to warfarin; however, use of rivaroxaban and apixaban is increasing. Patients initiated with rivaroxaban or apixaban in general have a higher predicted stroke and bleeding risks compared with warfarin or dabigatran initiators.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Denmark; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban; Sex Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Digoxin is a widely used drug for ventricular rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), despite a scarcity of randomised trial data. We studied the use and outcomes of digoxin in patients in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF).. For this retrospective analysis, we included and classified patients from ROCKET AF on the basis of digoxin use at baseline and during the study. Patients in ROCKET AF were recruited from 45 countries and had AF and risk factors putting them at moderate-to-high risk of stroke, with or without heart failure. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics and drugs to investigate the association of digoxin with all-cause mortality, vascular death, and sudden death. ROCKET AF was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00403767.. In 14,171 randomly assigned patients, digoxin was used at baseline in 5239 (37%). Patients given digoxin were more likely to be female (42% vs 38%) and have a history of heart failure (73% vs 56%), diabetes (43% vs 38%), and persistent AF (88% vs 77%; p<0·0001 for each comparison). After adjustment, digoxin was associated with increased all-cause mortality (5·41 vs 4·30 events per 100 patients-years; hazard ratio 1·17; 95% CI 1·04-1·32; p=0·0093), vascular death (3·55 vs 2·69 per 100 patient-years; 1·19; 1·03-1·39, p=0·0201), and sudden death (1·68 vs 1·12 events per 100 patient-years; 1·36; 1·08-1·70, p=0·0076).. Digoxin treatment was associated with a significant increase in all-cause mortality, vascular death, and sudden death in patients with AF. This association was independent of other measured prognostic factors, and although residual confounding could account for these results, these data show the possibility of digoxin having these effects. A randomised trial of digoxin in treatment of AF patients with and without heart failure is needed.. Janssen Research & Development and Bayer HealthCare AG.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Death, Sudden; Diabetes Mellitus; Digoxin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Male; Morpholines; Proportional Hazards Models; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Sex Distribution; Stroke; Thiophenes; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Research Design; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke Volume; Vasodilator Agents

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Diagnosis, Differential; Dyspnea; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyponatremia; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Enoxaparin; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Atrial Flutter; Catheter Ablation; Coronary Angiography; Drug Monitoring; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Atria; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Platelet activation in congestive heart failure (CHF) contributes to an increased risk for thromboembolic complications. Rivaroxaban, the first oral direct FXa inhibitor is approved in Europe for prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and prevention of thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation. As heart failure is an important risk factor for thromboembolism and increased platelet activation is common in heart failure, we investigated the potential effect of Rivaroxaban treatment on platelets in an experimental CHF model.. Chronic myocardial infarction was induced in male Wistar rats by coronary ligation. Rats were randomized to placebo or Rivaroxaban (3 and 10mg/kg once daily). After 10 weeks platelet activation was assessed. Platelet-bound fibrinogen, detected by flow-cytometry, was significantly increased in CHF-Placebo (p<0.05) and reduced following treatment with Rivaroxaban (p<0.05 vs. CHF-Placebo). ADP-induced aggregation was significantly enhanced in CHF-Placebo vs. sham-operated animals (p<0.05) and normalized following chronic FXa inhibition (p<0.05 vs. CHF-Placebo). In separate in vitro experiments, attenuated platelet aggregation was present after incubating whole blood directly with Rivaroxaban but absent when the experiment was performed in platelet-rich plasma only. Thus, a direct effect on platelets could be excluded.. Chronic direct factor Xa inhibition using Rivaroxaban reduces platelet activation in CHF rats by attenuating the secondary phase of ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Thus, Rivaroxaban may constitute a useful approach to prevent thromboembolic complications and reduce platelet activation in CHF at the same time.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

This article provides information and a commentary on key trials relevant to the pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of heart failure presented at the annual meeting of the American Heart Association held in Chicago in 2010. Unpublished reports should be considered as preliminary, since analyses may change in the final publication. In patients with mild heart failure (HF), EMPHASIS-HF showed that the addition of eplerenone to standard therapy was well tolerated and reduced both the risk of death and hospitalization. The addition of cardiac resynchronization therapy to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduced the incidence of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations in patients with NYHA class II-III HF compared with ICD alone in RAFT. Telemonitoring failed to improve outcome compared with a high standard of conventional care in patients with chronic HF (TIM-HF study) and a telephone-based interactive voice response system failed to improve outcome in patients recently hospitalized for HF (Tele-HF study). ASCEND-HF suggested that nesiritide was ineffective but safe in patients with acute decompensated HF. ROCKET-AF suggests that the factor-Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban may be as effective as warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The PROTECT study provided more data to suggest that amino-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide guided therapy may be beneficial in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Topics: Aged; American Heart Association; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Morpholines; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Rivaroxaban; Telemedicine; Thiophenes; United States