rivaroxaban and Gastrointestinal-Hemorrhage

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are highly prevalent conditions with a significant healthcare burden, and represent the main indications for anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first choice treatment of AF/VTE, and have become the most prescribed class of anticoagulants globally, overtaking vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Compared to VKAs, DOACs have a similar or better efficacy/safety profile, with reduced risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), while the risk of major bleeding and other bleeding harms may vary depending on the type of DOAC. We have critically reviewed available evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies regarding the risk of bleeding complications of DOACs compared to VKAs in patients with AF and VTE. Special patient populations (e.g., elderly, extreme body weights, chronic kidney disease) have specifically been addressed. Management of bleeding complications and possible resumption of anticoagulation, in particular after ICH and gastrointestinal bleeding, are also discussed. Finally, some suggestions are provided to choose the optimal DOAC to minimize adverse events according to individual patient characteristics and bleeding risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thromboembolism

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Several factors may cause OAC switching.. To examine the phenomenon of OAC switching in patients with AF, including all available evidence; frequency and patterns of switch, clinical outcomes, adherence, patient-reported outcomes, reasons for switch, factors associated with switch and evidence gaps.. Scoping review.. MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science, up to January 2022.. Of the 116 included studies, 2/3 examined vitamin K antagonist (VKA) to direct-acting OAC (DOAC) switching. Overall, OAC switching was common and the definition of an OAC switch varied across. Switching from VKA to dabigatran was the most prevalent switch type, but VKA to apixaban has increased in recent years. Patients on DOAC switched more to warfarin than to other DOACs. OAC doses involved in the switches were hardly reported and patients were often censored after the first switch. Switching back to a previously taken OAC (frequently warfarin) occurred in 5%-21% of switchers.The risk of ischaemic stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding in VKA to DOAC switchers compared with non-switchers was conflicting, while there was no difference in the risk of other types of bleeding. The risk of ischaemic stroke in switchers from DOAC versus non-switchers was conflicting. Studies evaluating adherence found no significant changes in adherence after switching from VKA to DOAC, however, an increase in satisfaction with therapy were reported. Reasons for OAC switch, and factors associated with OAC switch were mostly risk factors for stroke and bleeding. Clinical outcomes, adherence and patient-reported outcomes were sparse for switches from DOACs.. OAC switching is common in patients with AF and patients often switch back to an OAC they have previously been on. There are aspects of OAC switching that have received little study, especially in switches from DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

We aimed to determine the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).. A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting severe bleeding events in patients taking DOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In this frequency-based network meta-analysis, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used for reporting. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA), the relative ranking probability of each group was generated.. Twenty-three RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 87,616 patients were enrolled. The bleeding safety of DOACs for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with AF was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: fatal bleeding: edoxaban (SUCRA,80.2), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,68.3), apixaban (SUCRA,48.5), dabigatran (SUCRA,40.0), VKAs (SUCRA,12.9); major bleeding: dabigatran (SUCRA,74.0), apixaban (SUCRA,71.5), edoxaban (SUCRA,66.5), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,22.7), VKAs (SUCRA,15.4); gastrointestinal bleeding: apixaban (SUCRA,55.9), VKAs (SUCRA,53.7), edoxaban (SUCRA,50.5), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,50.4), dabigatran (SUCRA,39.5); intracranial hemorrhage: dabigatran (SUCRA,84.6), edoxaban (SUCRA,74.1), apixaban (SUCRA,65.8), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,24.4), VKAs (SUCRA,1.1).. Based on current evidence, for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with AF, the most safe DOAC is edoxaban in terms of fatal bleeding; dabigatran in terms of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage and apixaban in terms of gastrointestinal bleeding. However, given the nature of indirect comparisons, more high-quality evidence from head-to-head comparisons is still needed to confirm them.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K

The objective of present study was to compare the safety and efficacy of resuming direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and prior gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB).. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their inception until 2 June 2021 for observational cohort studies in patients with AF, who resumed VKAs or DOACs after a history of GIB. Studies that reported data on clinical outcomes including risk of recurrent GIB, thromboembolic events, or all-cause mortality were included. A network meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and associated 95% credible intervals (CIs), using a random effects model in a Bayesian framework.. A total of 10 studies were included in the final analysis, including 59,244 AF patients with prior GIB, of whom 27,793 resumed DOACs, 24,635 resumed warfarin, and 6816 did not resume anticoagulation. Compared with no resumption of anticoagulation, resumption of warfarin was associated with an increased risk of recurrent GIB (HR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06-1.70), but no increased risk of recurrent GIB was found with resumption of DOACs (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.88-1.71); among individual DOACs, only rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of recurrent GIB (HR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.16-2.65). Compared with no resumption of anticoagulation, resumption of DOACs and warfarin was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.40-0.84; HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.44-0.79), but no statistically significant reduction in thromboembolic events (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.4-1.2; HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.55-1.29).. In AF patients with prior GIB, resumption of DOACs may be safer, except for rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is the most common type of bleeding occurring in patients on oral anticoagulation. A meta-analysis of the landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with atrial fibrillation demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were associated with higher GIB rates compared to warfarin. However, significant heterogeneity existed between studies. While rivaroxaban, high-dose dabigatran, and high-dose edoxaban were associated with higher GIB rates than warfarin, GIB rates were similar between warfarin users and both apixaban and low-dose dabigatran users. Additionally, previous observational studies have yielded conflicting reports on whether GIB rates differ between warfarin and DOACs. Meta-analyses of observational studies demonstrated that warfarin is associated with lower rates of GIB compared to rivaroxaban, similar or lower rates compared to dabigatran, and higher rates compared to apixaban. Importantly, no RCT has compared individual DOACs directly and due to the different selection criteria of the initial RCTs, indirect comparisons between DOACs using these studies are unreliable. The best available information of comparisons between individual DOACs is therefore limited to observational studies. There is mounting evidence that suggests that rivaroxaban is associated with a higher risk of GIB compared to other DOACs. Finally, GIB induced by oral anticoagulation may have some positive aspects. Interestingly, there are studies that indicate oral anticoagulation facilitates colorectal cancer detection. Furthermore, results from RCTs and observational studies suggest that warfarin may even decrease the incidence of cancer.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with an overall favourable safety profile, the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remains controversial. Accordingly, we aimed to provide a focused overview of the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban and its management.. We reviewed published studies reporting on DOACs with gastrointestinal bleeding as an outcome, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective database studies and large-scale prospective cohort studies.. Cumulative evidence confirms no notable difference in major gastrointestinal bleeding risk between DOACs and VKAs. Moreover, gastrointestinal bleeding in DOAC-treated patients seems less severe and requires less intensive management. The main cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in DOAC-treated patients appears to be gastroduodenal ulcers, whereas lower gastrointestinal bleedings are mainly due to diverticula followed by angiodysplasia and haemorrhoids. The lack of head-to-head RCTs with DOACs precludes drawing conclusions on the DOAC with the lowest gastrointestinal bleeding risk. Prescribing physicians should be aware of risk factors for DOAC-related gastrointestinal bleeding (e.g. age > 65, heavy alcohol use, uncontrolled hypertension, hepatic or renal dysfunction, active cancer, anaemia) and adopt preventive measures accordingly. Management of DOAC-associated major gastrointestinal bleeding involves temporary discontinuation of the DOAC, investigation of the bleeding source and treatment of bleeding with fluid resuscitation combined with transfusion and endoscopic haemostasis.. DOACs as a class do not increase the risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding compared to VKAs, which supports their continued use for different anticoagulant indications.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K

The relative risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) among different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is debatable. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with each other are lacking. We performed network meta-analysis to assess whether the risk of major GIB differs based on type and dose of DOAC. Literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from inception to August 2019, limited to English publications, was conducted to identify RCTs comparing DOACs with warfarin or enoxaparin for any indication. Primary outcome of interest was major GIB risk. We used frequentist network meta-analysis through the random-effects model to compare DOACs with each other and DOACs by dose to isolate the impact on major GIB. Twenty-eight RCTs, including 139 587 patients receiving six anticoagulants, were selected. The risk of major GIB for DOACs was equal to warfarin. Comparison of DOACs with each other did not show risk differences. After accounting for dose, rivaroxaban 20 mg, dabigatran 300 mg and edoxaban 60 mg daily had 47, 40 and 22% higher rates of major GIB versus warfarin, respectively. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily had lower major GIB compared to dabigatran 300 mg (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88) and rivaroxaban 20 mg (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.83) daily. Heterogeneity was low, and the model was consistent without publication bias (Egger's test: P = 0.079). All RCTs were high-quality with low risk of bias. DOACs at standard dose, except apixaban, had a higher risk of major GIB compared to warfarin. Apixaban had a lower rate of major GIB compared to dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been widely used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. There is an issue with safety, especially in clinically relevant bleeding. We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with NOACs.. Interventions were warfarin, enoxaparin, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. The primary outcome was the incidence of major GI bleeding. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the following indications: AF, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, and postsurgical prophylaxis.. A total of 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 large observation population studies were included. Compared with warfarin, apixaban showed a decreased the risk of major GI bleeding (relative risk [RR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.76), and rivaroxaban tended to increase this risk (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.06-1.85). Dabigatran (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.98-1.60), edoxaban (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.69-1.65), and enoxaparin (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.63-2.43) did not significantly increase the risk of GI bleeding than did warfarin. In the subgroup analysis, according to indications, apixaban showed a decreased risk of major GI bleeding (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74) than did warfarin in AF studies. Dabigatran (RR 2.36, 95% CI 1.55-3.60, and rivaroxaban (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.10-6.41) increased the risk of major GI bleeding than did apixaban. An analysis of studies on venous thromboembolism or pulmonary embolism showed that no individual NOAC or enoxaparin was associated with an increased risk of major GI bleeding compared to warfarin.. Individual NOACs had varying profiles of GI bleeding risk. Results of analyses including only RCTs and those including both RCTs and population studies showed similar trends, but also showed several differences.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Observational Studies as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

To assess the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after the use of rivaroxaban or warfarin. To investigate the effects of rivaroxaban and warfarin on gastrointestinal and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with AF, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Medline from the establishment of databases up to 2020. We finally included 38 observational studies involving 1 312 609 patients for the assessment of intracranial hemorrhage, and 33 observational studies involving 1 332 956 patients for the assessment of gastrointestinal bleeding. The rates of intracranial hemorrhage were 0.55% in the rivaroxaban group versus 0.91% in the warfarin group (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.53-0.66; p < .00001, I2 = 78%). The rates of gastrointestinal bleeding were 2.63% in patients with rivaroxaban versus 2.48% in those with warfarin (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.96-1.17; p < .00001, I2 = 94%). Rivaroxaban could significantly reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with AF than warfarin, but the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding remained controversy due to no statistical significant difference. Notably, a subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients in rivaroxaban group with severe chronic renal diseases or undergoing hemodialysis exposed to less gastrointestinal hemorrhage risk than the group from warfarin.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

There is controversy over whether use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) associates with increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) compared with conventional therapies (such as vitamin K antagonists or anti-platelet agents). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials and high-quality real-world studies.. We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov Website databases (through Oct 12, 2018) for randomized controlled trials and high-quality real-world studies that reported major GIB events in patients given NOACs or conventional therapy. Relative risks (RRs) for randomized controlled trials and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for real-world studies were calculated separately using random-effects models.. We analyzed data from 43 randomized controlled trials (183,752 patients) and 41 real-world studies (1,879,428 patients). The pooled major rates of GIB for patients on NOACs (1.19%) vs conventional treatment (0.92%) did not differ significantly (RR from randomized controlled trials, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.91-1.31 and aHR from real-world studies, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94-1.10; P. In a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies, we confirmed that there is no significant difference in risk of major GIB between patients receiving NOACs vs conventional treatment. Rivaroxaban users had a 39% increase in risk for major GIB.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Fibrinolytic Agents; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Novel oral anticoagulants are the cornerstone of therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients to lower the risk of ischaemic stroke. Given the lack of head-to-head comparisons among oral anticoagulants, a Bayesian analysis was used to evaluate their safety and efficacy based on studies from real-world practice.. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies. Bayesian analyses were conducted to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) for the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulants.. In the 22 studies included in our analysis, novel oral anticoagulants exhibited a clear advantage over warfarin in preventing ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke and, especially, intracranial haemorrhage. Incidence of major bleeding was lowest for apixaban, followed by dabigatran, warfarin and rivaroxaban. Gastrointestinal bleeding risk was lowest for apixaban, followed by warfarin, and was slightly lower for dabigatran than for rivaroxaban with no statistical difference (HR 1.05, 95% CrI 0.99-1.11). Ischaemic stroke risk was lowest for rivaroxaban, followed by apixaban, dabigatran and warfarin (HR 1.13, 95% CrI 1.07-1.20).. In real-world practice, apixaban may represent the optimal treatment in terms of safety and efficacy for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. For patients with high risk of ischaemic events but low bleeding risk, rivaroxaban may be preferable.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Bayes Theorem; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) require dose reductions according to patient or clinical factors for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess outcomes with reduced-dose NOACs when given as pre-specified in pivotal trials.. Aggregated data abstracted from Phase III trials comparing NOACs with warfarin in patients with AF were assessed by treatment using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) stratified by patient eligibility for NOAC dose reduction. Irrespective of treatments, annualized rates of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were higher in patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs than in those eligible for full-dose NOACs (2.70% vs. 1.60% and 4.35% vs. 2.87%, respectively). Effects of reduced-dose NOACs compared with warfarin in patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs on stroke or systemic embolism [RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.69-1.03)] and on major bleeding [RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.50-0.97)] were consistent with those of full-dose NOACs relative to warfarin in those eligible for full-dose NOACs [RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.96) for stroke or systemic embolism and RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.70-1.08) for major bleeding; interaction P, 0.89 and 0.26, respectively]. In addition, NOACs were associated with reduced risks of haemorrhagic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, fatal bleeding, and death regardless of patient eligibility for NOAC dose reduction (interaction P > 0.05 for each).. Patients eligible for reduced-dose NOACs were at elevated risk of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic complications when treated with anticoagulants. NOACs, when appropriately dose-adjusted, had an improved benefit-harm profile compared with warfarin. Our findings highlight the importance of prescribing reduced-dose NOACs for indicated patient populations.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Background Several studies have investigated the effect of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with cancer, but the results remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin in this population. Methods and Results We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until February 16, 2019 for studies comparing the effect of NOACs with warfarin in AF patients with cancer. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were extracted and pooled by a random-effects model. Five studies involving 8908 NOACs and 12 440 warfarin users were included. There were no significant associations between cancer status and risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death in AF patients. Compared with warfarin, NOACs were associated with decreased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.99), venous thromboembolism (RR, 0.37, 95% CI, 0.22-0.63), and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98) and with borderline significant reductions in ischemic stroke (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-1.00) and major bleeding (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-1.00). In addition, risks of efficacy and safety outcomes of NOACs versus warfarin were similar between AF patients with and without cancer. Conclusions In patients with AF and cancer, compared with warfarin, NOACs had lower or similar rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events and posed a reduced risk of venous thromboembolism.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are convenient and effective in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, these drugs have been associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the risk of GI bleeding in patients receiving these drugs.. We searched the EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane, and ISI Web of knowledge databases through January 2016 for randomized trials that compared NOACs with conventional anticoagulants for approved indications. We conducted a meta-analysis, reporting odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was major GI bleeding. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and upper and lower GI bleeding. We performed a priori subgroup analyses by individual drug.. Our analysis included a total of 43 randomized trials, comprising 166,289 patients. There was no difference between NOACs and conventional anticoagulants in the risk of major bleeding (1.5% vs 1.3%, respectively; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.80-1.21), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (0.6% vs 0.6%, respectively; OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.36), upper GI bleeding (1.5% vs 1.6%, respectively; OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77-1.20), or lower GI bleeding (1.0% vs 1.0%, respectively; OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.67-1.15). Dabigatran (2.0% vs 1.4%, respectively; OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04-1.55) and rivaroxaban (1.7% vs 1.3%, respectively; OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.15-1.70) were associated with increased odds of major GI bleeding compared with conventional anticoagulation, whereas no difference was found for apixaban (0.6% vs 0.7%, respectively; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.64-1.02) or edoxaban (1.9% vs 1.6%, respectively; OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78-1.11). These subgroup findings were not observed in other sensitivity analyses.. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found risk of major GI bleeding to be similar between NOACs and conventional anticoagulation. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban, however, may be associated with increased odds of major GI bleeding. Further high-quality studies are needed to characterize GI bleeding risk among NOACs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

To evaluate current clinical evidence for management of oral anticoagulation therapy after gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) with an emphasis on whether to, when to, and how to resume an anticoagulation therapy.. Relevant articles from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were identified from 1946 through May 20, 2017, using the keywords: gastrointestinal hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding and antithrombotic therapy or anticoagulation therapy or warfarin or dabigatran or rivaroxaban or apixaban or edoxaban.. All English-language studies assessing management of oral anticoagulation therapy after GIB were evaluated.. A total of 9 studies were identified. Four retrospective cohort studies showed that resuming anticoagulation therapy was associated with significantly lower rate of thromboembolism (TE) in the general population. Meta-analyses and prospective cohort studies also supported this finding. Two retrospective cohort studies indicated an increase in GIB when anticoagulation reinitiation occurred in less than 7 days without a decrease in TE. Resuming therapy between 7 and 15 days did not demonstrate a significant increase in GIB or TE. A large retrospective study showed that apixaban was associated with the significantly lowest risk of GIB compared with both rivaroxaban and dabigatran.. Anticoagulation therapy resumption is recommended, with resumption being considered between 7 and 14 days following GIB regardless of the therapy chosen. Data for warfarin management after GIB should be applied with caution to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) because of the quicker onset and experimental nature of reversal agents. Apixaban may be a preferred option when restarting a DOAC therapy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Evidence from the real-world setting complements evidence coming from randomized controlled trials. We aimed to summarize all available evidence from high-quality real-world observational studies about efficacy and safety of nonvitamin-K oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin-K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation.. We searched PubMed and Web of Science until January 7, 2017 for observational nationwide or health insurance databases reporting matched or adjusted results comparing nonvitamin-K oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation. Outcomes assessed included ischemic stroke, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, any stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, major hemorrhage, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and death.. In 28 included studies of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared with vitamin-K antagonists, all 3 nonvitamin-K oral anticoagulants were associated with a large reduction of intracranial hemorrhage (apixaban hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.63; dabigatran HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.37-0.49; rivaroxaban HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.86); similar rates of ischemic stroke and ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (apixaban HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.75-1.19 and HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.95-1.22 / dabigatran HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80-1.16 and HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92-1.50 / rivaroxaban HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76-1.04 and HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52-1.04, respectively); apixaban and dabigatran with lower mortality (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.75 and HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53-0.75, respectively); apixaban with fewer gastrointestinal (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95) and major hemorrhages (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.63); dabigatran and rivaroxaban with more gastrointestinal hemorrhages (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.36 and HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.41, respectively); dabigatran and rivaroxaban with similar rate of myocardial infarction (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77-1.21 and HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.54-1.89, respectively).. This meta-analysis confirms the main findings of the randomized controlled trials of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in the real-world setting and, hence, strengthens their validity.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Particular concerns have been raised regarding the association between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB); however, current findings are still inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review with a meta-analysis to examine the association between NOACs and GIB in real-life settings. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL Plus up to September 2015. Observational studies that evaluated exposure to NOACs reporting GIB outcomes were included. The inverse variance method using the random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled estimates. Eight cohort studies were included in the primary meta-analysis, enrolling 1442 GIB cases among 106 626 dabigatran users (49 486 patient-years), and 184 GIB cases among 10 713 rivaroxaban users (4046 patient-years). The pooled incidence rates of GIB were 4.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.17, 5.84] and 7.18 (95% CI 2.42, 12.0) per 100 patient-years among dabigatran and rivaroxaban users, respectively. The summary risk ratio (RR) was 1.21 (95% CI 1.05, 1.39) for dabigatran compared with warfarin, and 1.09 (95% CI 0.92, 1.30) for rivaroxaban. Subgroup analyses showed a dose-related effect of dabigatran, with a significantly higher risk of GIB for 150 mg b.i.d. (RR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.34, 1.70) but not for 75 mg b.i.d. or 110 mg b.i.d.. In addition, the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)/histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) influenced the association in dabigatran users, whereas this effect was modest among rivaroxaban users. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggested a slightly higher risk of GIB with dabigatran use compared with warfarin, whereas no significant difference was found between rivaroxaban and warfarin for GIB risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a relatively recent addition to the oral anticoagulant armamentarium, and provide an alternative to the use of vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin. Regardless of the type of agent used, bleeding is the major complication of anticoagulant therapy. The decision to restart oral anticoagulation following a major hemorrhage in a previously anticoagulated patient is supported largely by retrospective studies rather than randomized clinical trials (mostly with vitamin K antagonists), and remains an issue of individualized clinical assessment: the patient's risk of thromboembolism must be balanced with the risk of recurrent major bleeding. This review provides guidance for clinicians regarding if and when a patient should be re-initiated on DOAC therapy following a major hemorrhage, based on the existing evidence.

Topics: Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism

New oral anticoagulants represent an alternative to standard therapy with vitamin K antagonists but data regarding gastrointestinal bleeding are still unclear.. To investigate if new oral anticoagulants are associated with an enhanced risk of gastrointestinal bleeding vs warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.. Meta-analysis of phase three randomized controlled trials to compare the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients treated with new oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) vs warfarin.. Four studies including 71,302 patients were selected. Compared with warfarin, new oral anticoagulants significantly increased gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 1.23; 95% CI 1.03-1.46; p=0.01). Rivaroxaban (RR: 1.46; 95% CI 1.2-1.8; p<0.001) and high dosages of edoxaban (RR: 1.22; 95% CI 1.01-1.47; p=0.038) and dabigatran (RR: 1.50; 95% CI 1.20-1.88; p<0.001) significantly increased gastrointestinal bleeding while a null effect was detected with apixaban.. This meta-analysis suggests that rivaroxaban and high dosages of dabigatran and edoxaban should be avoided in patients at high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding represents the most common adverse event associated with the use of oral anticoagulant therapy. Due to increasing prescription of anticoagulants worldwide, gastroenterologists are more and more called to deal with bleeding patients taking these medications. Their management is challenging because several issues have to be taken into account, such as the severity of bleeding, the intensity of anticoagulation, the patient's thrombotic risk and endoscopy findings. The recent introduction into the marketplace of new direct oral anticoagulants, for whom specific reversal agents are still lacking, further contributes to make the decision-making process even more demanding. Available evidence on this topic is limited and practice guidelines by gastroenterology societies only marginally address key issues for clinicians, including when and how to reverse coagulopathy, the optimal timing of endoscopy and when and how to resume anticoagulation thereafter. The present paper reviews the evidence in the literature and provides practical algorithms to support clinicians in the management of patients on anticoagulants who present with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Acute Disease; Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Coagulants; Dabigatran; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Four new oral anticoagulants have been approved for reducing stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Compared with warfarin, these agents offer a more predictable dose response with fewer food and drug interactions and no regular blood monitoring, although some of the drugs have an increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding. This article reviews the new drugs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Embolism; Morpholines; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Endoscopy; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes

Oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy are risk factors for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. GI bleeding-especially lower GI bleeding-seems to be associated with a poorer outcome. With the introduction of dabigatrane and rivaroxaban, difficulties in the management of bleeding complications arose. Thus, the goal of the authors was to establish a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the treatment of severe GI bleeding associated with rivaroxaban, dabigatrane, and antiplatelet therapy. Bleeding complications during phenprocoumon treatment should be treated with prothrombin complex concentrates and vitamin K1. Dabigatrane elimination is highly dependent to the renal function. The measurement of drug concentrations of dabigatrane and rivaroxaban is useful to indicate an increased risk of bleeding complications. Severe bleeding associated with dabigatrane or rivaroxaban therapy should trigger prothrombin complex therapy, whereby in cases with severe bleeding associated with antiplatelet therapy platelet transfusion should be initiated. Low-dose aspirin should be continued after 24 h.

Topics: Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Factors; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Heart Diseases; Humans; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Morpholines; Phenprocoumon; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Transfusion; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Vitamin K

Oral anticoagulation is the mainstay of therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin have many drawbacks that reduce their uptake, safety and effectiveness. The ROCKET AF trial compared rivaroxaban (20 mg/day; 15 mg/day in patients with creatinine clearance 30-49 ml/min) with dose-adjusted warfarin (international normalized ratio 2-3) in 14,264 patients with AF and a prior history of stroke or at least two other additional risk factors for stroke. The ROCKET AF trial demonstrated the noninferiority of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism, with a similar rate of major bleeding and a substantial reduction in intracranial hemorrhage. These results, in conjunction with its convenient once-daily dosing regimen, make rivaroxaban an attractive alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in AF.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Patients treated with antithrombotic drugs are at risk of bleeding. Bleeding may be the first manifestation of underlying cancer.. We examined new cancers diagnosed in relation to gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding among patients enrolled in the COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) and determined the hazard of new cancer diagnosis after bleeding at these sites.. Of 27 395 patients enrolled (mean age, 68 years; women, 21%), 2678 (9.8%) experienced any (major or minor) bleeding, 713 (2.6%) experienced major bleeding, and 1084 (4.0%) were diagnosed with cancer during a mean follow-up of 23 months. Among 2678 who experienced bleeding, 257 (9.9%) were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. Gastrointestinal bleeding was associated with a 20-fold higher hazard of new gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis (7.4% versus 0.5%; hazard ratio [HR], 20.6 [95% CI, 15.2-27.8]) and 1.7-fold higher hazard of new nongastrointestinal cancer diagnosis (3.8% versus 3.1%; HR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.20-2.40]). Genitourinary bleeding was associated with a 32-fold higher hazard of new genitourinary cancer diagnosis (15.8% versus 0.8%; HR, 32.5 [95% CI, 24.7-42.9]), and urinary bleeding was associated with a 98-fold higher hazard of new urinary cancer diagnosis (14.2% versus 0.2%; HR, 98.5; 95% CI, 68.0-142.7). Nongastrointestinal, nongenitourinary bleeding was associated with a 3-fold higher hazard of nongastrointestinal, nongenitourinary cancers (4.4% versus 1.9%; HR, 3.02 [95% CI, 2.32-3.91]).. In patients with atherosclerosis treated with antithrombotic drugs, any gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding was associated with higher rates of new cancer diagnosis. Any gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding should prompt investigation for cancers at these sites.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01776424.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Neoplasms; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Antiplatelets and anticoagulants are associated with increased upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We evaluated whether proton pump inhibitor therapy could reduce this risk.. We performed a 3 × 2 partial factorial double-blind trial of 17,598 participants with stable cardiovascular disease and peripheral artery disease. Participants were randomly assigned to groups given pantoprazole 40 mg daily or placebo, as well as rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily with aspirin 100 mg once daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily, or aspirin 100 mg alone. The primary outcome was time to first upper gastrointestinal event, defined as a composite of overt bleeding, upper gastrointestinal bleeding from a gastroduodenal lesion or of unknown origin, occult bleeding, symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcer or ≥5 erosions, upper gastrointestinal obstruction, or perforation.. There was no significant difference in upper gastrointestinal events between the pantoprazole group (102 of 8791 events) and the placebo group (116 of 8807 events) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.15). Pantoprazole significantly reduced bleeding of gastroduodenal lesions (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.94; P = .03); this reduction was greater when we used a post-hoc definition of bleeding gastroduodenal lesion (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.74), although the number needed to treat still was high (n = 982; 95% confidence interval, 609-2528).. In a randomized placebo-controlled trial, we found that routine use of proton pump inhibitors in patients receiving low-dose anticoagulation and/or aspirin for stable cardiovascular disease does not reduce upper gastrointestinal events, but may reduce bleeding from gastroduodenal lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01776424.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pantoprazole; Peptic Ulcer; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective at treating acid-related disorders. These drugs are well tolerated in the short term, but long-term treatment was associated with adverse events in observational studies. We aimed to confirm these findings in an adequately powered randomized trial.. We performed a 3 × 2 partial factorial double-blind trial of 17,598 participants with stable cardiovascular disease and peripheral artery disease randomly assigned to groups given pantoprazole (40 mg daily, n = 8791) or placebo (n = 8807). Participants were also randomly assigned to groups that received rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) with aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg) alone. We collected data on development of pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection, other enteric infections, fractures, gastric atrophy, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive lung disease, dementia, cardiovascular disease, cancer, hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality every 6 months. Patients were followed up for a median of 3.01 years, with 53,152 patient-years of follow-up.. There was no statistically significant difference between the pantoprazole and placebo groups in safety events except for enteric infections (1.4% vs 1.0% in the placebo group; odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.75). For all other safety outcomes, proportions were similar between groups except for C difficile infection, which was approximately twice as common in the pantoprazole vs the placebo group, although there were only 13 events, so this difference was not statistically significant.. In a large placebo-controlled randomized trial, we found that pantoprazole is not associated with any adverse event when used for 3 years, with the possible exception of an increased risk of enteric infections. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT01776424.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pantoprazole; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) sometimes cause hemorrhage, and the gastrointestinal tract is a common site of involvement. However, clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) during NOAC therapy have not been fully elucidated. We studied 658 patients who were prescribed dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban between April 2011 and November 2015. Medical charts were reviewed to examine whether clinically relevant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria type 2 or greater) developed. The incidence of GIB was 2.0%/year, and one-third was from the upper GI. Among all hemorrhagic events, GIB was the most common cause. The extent of bleeding from the GI tract, particularly the upper GI tract, was more serious than bleeding from the other site. Multiple regression analysis showed that both past digestive ulcer and absence of concomitant proton pump inhibitors were significantly associated with the incidence of upper GIB, while concomitant nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, dual antiplatelets, and past GIB were significant factors regarding lower GIB. GIB was common and serious in patients taking NOACs. Upper GIB tended to become more serious than lower GIB. Proton pump inhibitors seem to be key drugs for preventing upper GIB during NOAC therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is a recombinant modified human factor Xa decoy protein that has been shown to reverse the inhibition of factor Xa in healthy volunteers.. In this multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-group study, we evaluated 67 patients who had acute major bleeding within 18 hours after the administration of a factor Xa inhibitor. The patients all received a bolus of andexanet followed by a 2-hour infusion of the drug. Patients were evaluated for changes in measures of anti-factor Xa activity and were assessed for clinical hemostatic efficacy during a 12-hour period. All the patients were subsequently followed for 30 days. The efficacy population of 47 patients had a baseline value for anti-factor Xa activity of at least 75 ng per milliliter (or ≥0.5 IU per milliliter for those receiving enoxaparin) and had confirmed bleeding severity at adjudication.. The mean age of the patients was 77 years; most of the patients had substantial cardiovascular disease. Bleeding was predominantly gastrointestinal or intracranial. The mean (±SD) time from emergency department presentation to the administration of the andexanet bolus was 4.8±1.8 hours. After the bolus administration, the median anti-factor Xa activity decreased by 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58 to 94) from baseline among patients receiving rivaroxaban and by 93% (95% CI, 87 to 94) among patients receiving apixaban. These levels remained similar during the 2-hour infusion. Four hours after the end of the infusion, there was a relative decrease from baseline of 39% in the measure of anti-factor Xa activity among patients receiving rivaroxaban and of 30% among those receiving apixaban. Twelve hours after the andexanet infusion, clinical hemostasis was adjudicated as excellent or good in 37 of 47 patients in the efficacy analysis (79%; 95% CI, 64 to 89). Thrombotic events occurred in 12 of 67 patients (18%) during the 30-day follow-up.. On the basis of a descriptive preliminary analysis, an initial bolus and subsequent 2-hour infusion of andexanet substantially reduced anti-factor Xa activity in patients with acute major bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitors, with effective hemostasis occurring in 79%. (Funded by Portola Pharmaceuticals; ANNEXA-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02329327 .).

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Diseases; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common complication of oral anticoagulation.. This study evaluated GI bleeding in patients who received at least 1 dose of the study drug in the on-treatment arm of the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) trial.. The primary outcome was adjudicated GI bleeding reported from first to last drug dose + 2 days. Multivariable modeling was performed with pre-specified candidate predictors.. Of 14,236 patients, 684 experienced GI bleeding during follow-up. These patients were older (median age 75 years vs. 73 years) and less often female. GI bleeding events occurred in the upper GI tract (48%), lower GI tract (23%), and rectum (29%) without differences between treatment arms. There was a significantly higher rate of major or nonmajor clinical GI bleeding in rivaroxaban- versus warfarin-treated patients (3.61 events/100 patient-years vs. 2.60 events/100 patient-years; hazard ratio: 1.42; 95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 1.66). Severe GI bleeding rates were similar between treatment arms (0.47 events/100 patient-years vs. 0.41 events/100 patient-years; p = 0.39; 0.01 events/100 patient-years vs. 0.04 events/100 patient-years; p = 0.15, respectively), and fatal GI bleeding events were rare (0.01 events/100 patient-years vs. 0.04 events/100 patient-years; 1 fatal events vs. 5 fatal events total). Independent clinical factors most strongly associated with GI bleeding were baseline anemia, history of GI bleeding, and long-term aspirin use.. In the ROCKET AF trial, rivaroxaban increased GI bleeding compared with warfarin. The absolute fatality rate from GI bleeding was low and similar in both treatment arms. Our results further illustrate the need for minimizing modifiable risk factors for GI bleeding in patients on oral anticoagulation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Coagulation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Internationality; Male; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The increased risk of thrombosis and bleeding with an active tumor disease is known as the so-called "thrombo-hemorrhagic syndrome", which places high demands on anticoagulation. There are currently 4 randomized, prospective studies on the use of new, non-vitamin K dependent oral anticoagulants (NOAC) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) that have occurred in oncology. The FXa inhibitors rivaroxaban, edoxaban and twice apixaban were each used in individual studies versus the standard therapeutic agent dalteparin. Since there is no direct head-to-head comparison of the FXa inhibitors mentioned within a study, the largest study - always compared to dalteparin - was evaluated for each NOAC. The studies were analyzed with regard to their effectiveness, safety, fatal bleeding rates, the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and other differences using descriptive statistics. With dalteparin, the mean VTE recurrence rate was approximately 9% over a 6-month treatment period. All three FXa inhibitors were not inferior to dalteparin in terms of potency. The VTE recurrence rate was - 2.3% lower in edoxaban and apixaban-treated patients and - 5.0% in rivaroxaban-treated patients. In terms of safety, there was an increased rate of severe bleeding (both + 2.4%) for rivaroxaban and edoxaban compared to dalteparin; in particular, the number of GIBs was significantly increased. In contrast, the number of severe bleeding was not increased for apixaban, as was the case for various bleeding types including GIB. In the Apixaban study, the overall rate of severe GIB, which accounted for about 50% of all severe bleeding, and that of clinically relevant non-severe bleeding, were the lowest. The FXa inhibitors are not inferior to the standard therapy with dalteparin in the VTE recurrence rate in oncological patients. The GIB rate appears to be an important predictive factor for the safety of this group of substances, so that tumor location, gastrointestinal risk factors and other individual criteria should be given greater consideration in future therapy decisions for or against an FXa inhibitor.. Das erhöhte Thrombose- und Blutungsrisiko bei aktiver Tumorerkrankung wird als sog. „thrombo-hämorrhagisches Syndrom“ bezeichnet, welches hohe Anforderungen an die Antikoagulation stellt. Aktuell liegen 4 randomisierte, prospektive Studien zum Einsatz von neuen, nicht Vitamin K-abhängigen oralen Antikoagulantien (NOAK) zur Behandlung von in der Onkologie aufgetretenen venösen Thromboembolien (VTE) vor. Dabei wurden die FXa-Inhibitoren Rivaroxaban, Edoxaban und zweimal Apixaban jeweils in einzelnen Studien gegenüber dem Standardtherapeutikum Dalteparin eingesetzt. Da es keinen direkten Head-to-Head-Vergleich der genannten FXa-Inhibitoren innerhalb einer Studie gibt, wurde zu jedem NOAK die jeweils größte Studie – stets verglichen gegenüber Dalteparin – ausgewertet. Die Studien wurden bzgl. ihrer Wirksamkeit, Sicherheit, fataler Blutungsraten, dem Risiko für gastrointestinale Blutungen (GIB) und sonstiger Unterschiede anhand deskriptiver Statistik analysiert. Unter Dalteparin ergab sich eine mittlere VTE-Rezidivrate von ca. 9% bei einem 6-monatigen Behandlungszeitraum. Alle 3 FXa-Inhibitoren waren gegenüber Dalteparin bezüglich der Wirksamkeit nicht unterlegen. Die VTE-Rezidivrate war bei mit Edoxaban und Apixaban behandelten Patienten um – 2,3% und bei Rivaroxaban um – 5,0% niedriger.Bei der Sicherheit fanden sich – jeweils gegenüber Dalteparin – für Rivaroxaban und Edoxaban eine erhöhte Rate an schweren Blutungen (jeweils +2,4%); insbesondere war hierbei die Zahl GIB deutlich erhöht. Dagegen war für Apixaban die Zahl schwerer Blutungen, wie auch für verschiedene Blutungstypen inkl. GIB, nicht erhöht. In der Apixabanstudie war insgesamt die Rate von schweren GIB, die ca. 50% aller schweren Blutungen ausmachten, und die der klinisch-relevanten nicht schweren Blutungen, am niedrigsten. Die FXa-Inhibitoren sind der Standardtherapie mit Dalteparin in der VTE-Rezidivrate bei onkologischen Patienten nicht unterlegen. Die GIB-Rate scheint ein wichtiger prädiktiver Faktor für die Sicherheit dieser Substanzgruppe zu sein, sodass Tumorlokalisation, gastrointestinale Risikofaktoren und andere individuelle Kriterien in Zukunft stärker bei der Therapieentscheidung für oder gegen einen FXa-Inhibitor berücksichtigt werden sollten.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and develop a risk score that would provide an effective tool for the clinical assessment of GIB.. This was a multicentre retrospective analysis of clinical and follow-up data of patients treated with DOACs. The score was developed through logistic regression. The performance of score was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and Hosmer-Lemeshow test.. Based on 12 factors, we developed a gastrointestinal bleeding risk score. The newly developed Alfalfa-DOAC-GIB score has better predictive value than the HAS-BLED score and the New score, and might be an effective tool to help reduce the occurrence of GIB in patients using DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Agents; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Tramadol, a weak opioid, inhibits the reuptake of serotonin, a key feature on vascular homeostasis. A suspected interaction exists between dabigatran and tramadol, which might trigger an excess on risk of bleeding however, there is a gap in knowledge on this topic.. To estimate the effects of tramadol, dabigatran and concomitant use on the risk of hospitalized major bleeds (Gastrointestinal bleeding and intra-extracranial bleeds).. Among a validated established cohort of new users of oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) aged 18 years or older, we identified all hospitalized bleed episodes (GIB and extra/intracranial bleeds) within 2008-2015. A nested case-control analysis was conducted using conditional logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dabigatran, tramadol, and concomitant use. Several sensitivity analyses were carried out.. aORs (95%CIs) for current use of only dabigatran, only tramadol and concomitant users were 1.73 (1.37-2.18) and 1.38 (1.13-1.67) and 2.04 (0.74-5.67) compared with non-users of both drugs (>365 days). aORs for current continuers and non-continuer users of dabigatran were 1.36 (1.00-1.86) and 2.19 (1.61-2.98), respectively. For the latter, non-continuer users with a short duration of dabigatran cumulated the highest risk (3.36 [1.88-5.99]). There also was an increased risk with concomitant use of tramadol and rivaroxaban (2.24 [1.19-4.21]), or antagonist of vitamin K (1.30 [1.00-1.69]).. There was a trend towards and increased risk of excess bleeds when using concomitantly with dabigatran. The effect decreases with a narrower definition of current use.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke; Tramadol

The periprocedural management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) undergoing elective gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedure remains uncertain. We investigated the safety of a standardized periprocedural DOAC management strategy.. The Periprocedural Anticoagulation Use for Surgery Evaluation cohort study enrolled adult patients receiving a DOAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran) for AF scheduled for an elective procedure or surgery. This analysis addresses patients undergoing digestive endoscopy. Standardized periprocedural management consisted of DOAC interruption 1 day preendoscopy with resumption 1 day after procedure at low-moderate risk of bleeding or 2 days in case of a high bleeding risk. Thirty-day outcomes included GI bleeding, thromboembolic events, and mortality.. Of 556 patients on a DOAC (mean [SD] age of 72.5 [8.6] years; 37.4% female; mean CHADS 2 score 1.7 [1.0]), 8.6% were also on American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) and 0.7% on clopidogrel. Most of the patients underwent colonoscopies (63.3%) or gastroscopies (14.0%), with 18.9% having both on the same procedural day. The mean total duration of DOAC interruption was 3.9 ± 1.6 days. Four patients experienced an arterial thromboembolic event (0.7%, 0.3%-1.8%) within 24.2 ± 5.9 days of DOAC interruption. GI bleeding events occurred in 2.5% (1.4%-4.2%) within 11.1 ± 8.1 days (range: 0.6; 25.5 days) of endoscopy, with major GI bleeding in 0.9% (0.4%-2.1%). Three patients died (0.5%; 0.2%-1.6%) 15.6-22.3 days after the endoscopy.. After a contemporary standardized periprocedural management strategy, patients with AF undergoing DOAC therapy interruption for elective digestive endoscopy experienced low rates of arterial thromboembolism and major bleeding.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Child; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are dose-reduced in elderly and patients with impaired renal function. Only reduced dose dabigatran is concluded as having similar stroke risk reduction and lower risk of major bleeding than warfarin in the pivotal studies. In clinical practice, reduced dose is prescribed more often than expected making this an important issue. The objective of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety between reduced dose DOACs and high TTR warfarin treatment (TTR ≥ 70%) in NVAF. A Swedish anticoagulation registry was used in identifying eligible patients from July 2011 to December 2017. The study cohort consisted of 40,564 patients with newly initiated DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban) (11,083 patients) or warfarin treatment (29,481 patients) after exclusion of 374,135 patients due to not being warfarin or DOAC naïve, not being prescribed reduced dose, having previous mechanical heart valve (MHV), or being under 18 years old. The median durations of follow up were 365, 419, 432 and 473 days for apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin, respectively. Warfarin TTR identified from Auricula was 70.0%. Endpoints (stroke and major bleeding) and baseline characteristics were collected from hospital administrative registers using ICD-10 codes. Cohorts were compared using weighted adjusted Cox regression after full optimal matching based on propensity scores. DOACs are associated with lower risk of major bleeding (HR with 95% CI) 0.85 (0.78-0.93), intracranial bleeding HR 0.64 (0.51-0.80), hemorrhagic stroke HR 0.68 (0.50-0.92), gastrointestinal bleeding HR 0.81 (0.69-0.96) and all-cause stroke HR 0.87 (0.76-0.99), than warfarin. Apixaban and dabigatran are associated with lower risk of major bleeding, HR 0.70 (0.63-0.78) and HR 0.80 (0.69-0.94), and rivaroxaban is associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke, HR 0.73 (0.59-0.96), with higher major bleeding risk, HR 1.31 (1.15-1.48), compared to warfarin. Apixaban is associated with higher all-cause mortality compared to warfarin, HR 1.12 (1.03-1.21). DOACs are associated with lower risk of major bleeding and all-cause stroke, than high quality warfarin treatment, with exception of rivaroxaban that carried higher risk of major bleeding and lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism. In this large observational registry-based NVAF cohort, DOACs are preferred treatment in patients with indication for DOAC dose reduction, even

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used and are an important cornerstone in antithrombotic therapy. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as bleedings have only partially been investigated during clinical trials. The primary goal was to analyse pharmacovigilance data based on spontaneous reports of gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings with DOACs reported to EudraVigilance. A second goal was to compare GI safety profiles between DOACs based on these signals. All DOAC related GI bleedings mentioned in individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from 2012 till 2017 in the European Economic Area were classified in four GI categories based on the reported site of occurrence of the haemorrhage. Age group and gender of the patient, seriousness and ADR outcome, and the reporter's qualification were assessed per category and per DOAC. Disproportionality analyses were performed to evaluate whether or not the reported ADRs were more prevalent with a given DOAC. ICSRs were bleeding-related in about half of the cases (n = 28,992/53,471). Of these bleedings,  >25% was GI-related. Most patients experiencing GI bleedings were between 65 and 85 years old, with no obvious differences between men and women. Stomach, ulcer-related duodenal, and rectal bleedings were the most reported GI bleedings with a fatal outcome in 5.8%, 7.5%, and 9.8% of the cases for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, respectively. The disproportionality data suggest that dabigatran is more frequently involved in GI bleeding events than the other DOACs. DOACs were significantly associated with GI bleedings. Although the data should be interpreted with caution, it seems that dabigatran was associated more often than other DOACs with GI bleedings based on the analysis of spontaneous pharmacovigilance reports.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in renal transplant recipients (RTR), but relatively understudied in this population. We assess the safety of post-transplant anticoagulation with DOACs compared to warfarin.. We conducted a retrospective study of RTRs at the Mayo Clinic sites (2011-present) that were anticoagulated for greater than 3 months excluding the 1st month post-transplant. The main safety outcomes were bleeding and all-cause mortality. Concomitant antiplatelet and interacting drugs were noted. DOAC dose adjustment was assessed according to common US prescribing practices, guidelines, and/or FDA labeling.. The median follow-up was longer for RTRs on warfarin (1098 days [IQR 521, 1517]) than DOACs (449 days [IQR 338, 942]). Largely, there were no differences in baseline characteristics and comorbidities between RTRs on DOACs (n = 208; apixaban 91.3%, rivaroxaban 8.7%) versus warfarin (n = 320). There was no difference in post-transplant use of antiplatelets, immunosuppressants, most antifungals assessed, or amiodarone. There was no significant difference in incident major bleeding (8.4 vs. 5.3%, p = 0.89), GI bleeding (4.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.98), or intra-cranial hemorrhage (1.9% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.85) between warfarin and DOAC. There was no significant difference in mortality in the warfarin group compared to DOACs when adjusted for follow-up time (22.2% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.21). Rates of post-transplant venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation or stroke were similar between the two groups. 32% (n = 67) of patients on DOACs were dose reduced, where 51% of those reductions were warranted. 7% of patients that were not dose reduced should have been.. DOACs did not have inferior bleeding or mortality outcomes compared to warfarin in RTRs. There was greater use of warfarin compared to DOACs and a high rate of improper DOAC dose reduction.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

A high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding has been reported with the use of some direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This risk may be of particular concern in individuals with associated anaemia. The aim of this study is to investigate potential differences in the risks of gastrointestinal bleeding and stroke among the four available DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and moderate or severe anaemia.. All Danish patients diagnosed with incident AF who had a baseline haemoglobin measurement and subsequently initiated DOAC therapy between 2012 and 2021 were identified through administrative registries. Only patients with moderate or severe anaemia (N = 7269) were included and evaluated regarding the risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding and stroke. Standardized absolute 1-year risks of stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding were calculated from multivariable Cox regression analyses. DOACs were compared pairwise RESULTS: Compared with apixaban, both dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with a significantly increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with standardized 1-year risk ratios of 1.73 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.35) and 1.56 (95 % CI, 1.18-1.93), respectively, while no significant difference was seen in the comparison of apixaban with edoxaban 1.32 (95 % CI, 0.41-2.32). No significant differences in gastrointestinal bleeding were observed with pairwise comparisons of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and edoxaban. Finally, no significant difference in stroke risk among the four DOACs was observed.. In AF patients with moderate or severe anaemia, apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding than dabigatran and rivaroxaban. No significant difference in stroke risk was observed across all four available DOACs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anemia; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Apixaban and rivaroxaban are replacing vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adults; however, head-to-head comparisons remain limited.. To assess the effectiveness and safety of apixaban compared with rivaroxaban in patients with VTE.. Retrospective new-user cohort study.. U.S.-based commercial health care insurance database from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2020.. Adults with VTE who were newly prescribed apixaban or rivaroxaban.. The primary effectiveness outcome was recurrent VTE, a composite of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeding.. Of 49 900 eligible patients with VTE, 18 618 were new users of apixaban and 18 618 were new users of rivaroxaban. Median follow-up was 102 days (25th, 75th percentiles: 30, 128 days) among apixaban and 105 days (25th, 75th percentiles: 30, 140 days) among rivaroxaban users. After propensity score matching, apixaban (vs. rivaroxaban) was associated with a lower rate for recurrent VTE (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69 to 0.87]) and bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.60 [CI, 0.53 to 0.69]). The absolute reduction in the probability of recurrent VTE with apixaban versus rivaroxaban was 0.006 (CI, 0.005 to 0.011) within 2 months and 0.011 (CI, 0.011 to 0.013) within 6 months of initiation. The absolute reduction in the probability of gastrointestinal and intracranial bleeding with apixaban versus rivaroxaban was 0.011 (CI, 0.010 to 0.011) within 2 months and 0.015 (CI, 0.013 to 0.015) within 6 months of initiation.. Short follow-up.. In this population-based cohort study, patients with VTE who were new users of apixaban had lower rates for recurrent VTE and bleeding than new users of rivaroxaban.. None.

Topics: Aged; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Databases, Factual; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; United States; Venous Thromboembolism

Although several studies have compared the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct comparison of these drugs with edoxaban is lacking.. We compared the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban in patients with VTE.. In this retrospective cohort study using a Japanese hospital administrative database, we identified three mutually exclusive groups of patients with VTE beginning treatment with edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. Primary effectiveness outcome was recurrent VTE, and principal safety outcome was a composite of intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding. Subjects were followed for up to 180 days. Baseline characteristics among groups were balanced using propensity score matching weights.. Three thousand three hundred sixty-nine edoxaban, 1592 rivaroxaban, and 1998 apixaban initiators were identified. There were no significant differences among the three drugs in the prevention of recurrent VTE (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-1.30 for edoxaban vs. rivaroxaban; aIRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.54-1.56 for edoxaban vs. apixaban; and aIRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.69-2.10 for rivaroxaban vs. apixaban), or in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding (aIRR, 1.57, 95% CI, 0.85-2.90 for edoxaban vs. rivaroxaban; aIRR, 1.30, 95% CI, 0.76-2.23 for edoxaban vs. apixaban; and aIRR, 0.83, 95% CI, 0.42-1.64 for rivaroxaban vs. apixaban).. In routine care, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban appear to have similar effectiveness and safety in the treatment of VTE.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

The advantages of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin are well established in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, however, studies that can guide the selection between different DOACs are limited. The aim was to compare the clinical outcomes of treatment with apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran in patients with AF.. We conducted a retrospective, nationwide, propensity score-matched-based observational study from Clalit Health Services. Data from 141 992 individuals with AF was used to emulate a target trial for head-to-head comparison of DOACs therapy. Three-matched cohorts of patients assigned to DOACs, from January-2014 through January-2020, were created. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed. Efficacy/safety outcomes were compared using KaplanMeier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. The trial included 56 553 patients (apixaban, n = 35 101; rivaroxaban, n = 15 682; dabigatran, n = 5 770). Mortality and ischaemic stroke rates in patients treated with rivaroxaban were lower compared with apixaban (HR,0.88; 95% CI,0.78-0.99; P,0.037 and HR 0.92; 95% CI,0.86-0.99; P,0.024, respectively). No significant differences in the rates of myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, and overall bleeding were noticed between the different DOACs groups. Patients treated with rivaroxaban demonstrated lower rate of intracranial haemorrhage compared with apixaban (HR,0.86; 95% CI,0.74-1.0; P,0.044). The rate of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients treated with rivaroxaban was higher compared with apixaban (HR, 1.22; 95% CI,1.01-1.44; P, 0.016).. We demonstrated significant differences in outcomes between the three studied DOACs. The results emphasize the need for randomized controlled trials that will compare rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran in order to better guide the selection among them.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

There were limited data on the risk of post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). We aimed to evaluate the PPB and thromboembolic risks among DOAC and warfarin users in a population-based cohort.. We performed a territory-wide retrospective cohort study involving patients in Hong Kong from 2012 to 2020. Patients who received an oral anticoagulant and had undergone colonoscopy with polypectomy were identified. Propensity-score models with inverse probability of treatment weighting were developed for the warfarin-DOAC and between-DOAC comparisons. The primary outcome was clinically significant delayed PPB, defined as repeat colonoscopy requiring haemostasis within 30 days. The secondary outcomes were 30-day blood transfusion requirement and new thromboembolic event.. Apixaban was associated with lower PPB risk than warfarin (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.39, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.63, p<0.001). Dabigatran (aHR 2.23, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.77, adjusted p (ap)=0.035) and rivaroxaban (aHR 2.72, 95% CI 1.35 to 5.48, ap=0.002) were associated with higher PPB risk than apixaban. In subgroup analysis, apixaban was associated with lower PPB risk in patients aged ≥70 years and patients with right-sided colonic polyps.For thromboembolic events, apixaban was associated with lower risk than warfarin (aHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.45, p<0.001). Dabigatran (aHR 2.60, 95% CI 1.06 to 6.41, ap=0.033) and rivaroxaban (aHR 2.96, 95% CI 1.19 to 7.37, ap =0.013) were associated with higher thromboembolic risk than apixaban.. Apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of PPB and thromboembolism than warfarin, dabigatran and rivaroxaban, particularly in older patients with right-sided polyps.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Transfusion; Cohort Studies; Colonic Polyps; Colonoscopy; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hong Kong; Humans; Male; Postoperative Complications; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) can be mitigated by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) co-therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with anticoagulants. We aimed to evaluate the effect of PPIs on the risk of GIB in Asian patients with AF, treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs), and with a prior history of upper GIB.. Using a nationwide claims database, OAC-naïve patients with AF and a history of upper GIB before initiating OAC treatment between January 2010 and April 2018 were included. Patients were categorized into 10 groups according to the index OAC (warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban) and whether or not they received PPI co-therapy, and were followed up for incidence of major GIB.. Among a total of 42,048 patients, 40% were prescribed PPIs as co-therapy with OACs. Over a median 0.6 years (interquartile ranges 0.2-1.7 years) of follow-up, rivaroxaban use without PPIs showed the highest crude incidence of major GIB (2.62 per 100 person-years), followed by the use of warfarin without a PPI (2.20 per 100 person-years). Compared to the patients without PPI use, PPI co-therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of major GIB, by 40% and 36%, in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups, respectively. In dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban users, PPI co-therapy did not show a significant reduction in the risk of major GIB.. Among patients with AF receiving anticoagulant treatment and with a prior history of upper GIB, PPI co-therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of major GIB in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Upper Gastrointestinal Tract; Warfarin

This study assesses the mortality outcomes of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation (AF).. Medical records of cancer patients receiving NOACs for VTE or AF between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, were retrieved from Taiwan's National Health Institute Research Database. NOACs were compared using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. The primary outcome was cancer-related death. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.. Among 202,754 patients who received anticoagulants, 3591 patients (dabigatran: 907; rivaroxaban: 2684) with active cancers were studied. Patients who received dabigatran were associated with lower risks of cancer-related death at one year (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54-0.93) and at the end of follow-ups (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.64-0.98) compared with rivaroxaban. Patients who received dabigatran were also associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67-0.97), major bleeding (HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.47-0.88), and GI bleeding (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.39-0.84) at the end of follow-ups compared with rivaroxaban.. Compared with rivaroxaban, the use of dabigatran may be associated with a lower risk of cancer-related death and all-cause mortality.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Taiwan; Venous Thromboembolism

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) rates for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin have been extensively compared. However, population-based studies comparing GIB rates among different DOACs are limited.. To compare rates of GIB among apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban.. Nationwide population-based cohort study.. Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland and the 4 regional hospitals in Iceland.. New users of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban from 2014 to 2019.. Rates of GIB were compared using inverse probability weighting, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and Cox regression.. In total, 2157 patients receiving apixaban, 494 patients receiving dabigatran, and 3217 patients receiving rivaroxaban were compared. For all patients, rivaroxaban had higher overall rates of GIB (3.2 vs. 2.5 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.42 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.93]) and major GIB (1.9 vs. 1.4 events per 100 person-years; HR, 1.50 [CI, 1.00 to 2.24]) compared with apixaban. Rivaroxaban also had higher GIB rates than dabigatran, with similar point estimates, although the CIs were wider and included the possibility of a null effect. When only patients with atrial fibrillation were included, rivaroxaban was associated with higher rates of overall GIB than apixaban (HR, 1.40 [CI, 1.01 to 1.94]) or dabigatran (HR, 2.04 [CI, 1.17 to 3.55]). Dabigatran was associated with lower rates of upper GIB than rivaroxaban in both analyses.. Unmeasured confounding and small subgroup analyses.. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher GIB rates than apixaban and dabigatran regardless of treatment indication.. Icelandic Centre for Research and Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland.

Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Digestive System Diseases; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Iceland; Male; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Ulcer

Several direct oral anticoagulants have been developed to prevent cardiogenic thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation, on the other hand, have the complication of bleeding. Since clinical course after bleeding with direct oral anticoagulant remains unclear, the present retrospective cohort study was to clarify the course after hemorrhage among patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants. Among all 2005 patients prescribed dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban between April 2011 and June 2017, subjects comprised 96 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who experienced relevant bleeding during direct oral anticoagulant therapy (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 or above). The clinical course after hemorrhage was reviewed to examine whether rebleeding or thrombotic events occurred up to the end of December 2019. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most frequent cause of initial bleeding (57 patients, 59%). Rebleeding occurred in 11 patients (4.5%/year), with gastrointestinal bleeding in 10 and subarachnoid hemorrhage in 1. All rebleeding occurred in patients who resumed anticoagulation therapy. Another significant factor related with rebleeding included past history of gastrointestinal bleeding. On the other hand, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred in 6 patients older than 75 years old or more (2.5%/year), with systemic thrombosis in 4 and cardiac death in 2. All 4 patients with systemic thrombosis withheld anticoagulants after index bleeding, although only 10 patients withheld anticoagulation therapy. Rebleeding should be taken care of when anticoagulants are resumed after bleeding, particularly among patients who initially experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. Systemic thrombosis occurred at a high rate when anticoagulant therapy was withheld after bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thrombosis

To evaluate comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin in Medicare beneficiaries with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM).. A retrospective cohort study using 2014-2016 5% national Medicare data was undertaken. NVAF patients with DM aged ≥65 years having at least one prescription for NOACs or warfarin between July 2014 and December 2015 were included in the study. Propensity score matching was used to balance demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of patients in two treatment groups. Cardiovascular outcomes including stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and myocardial infarction (MI) were evaluated to measure effectiveness. Assessment of safety outcomes included intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), major gastrointestinal bleeding (MGB), bleeding from other sites (OB) and all-cause mortality. Stratified Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios for the outcomes in the matched cohort.. The matched sample consisted of 4582 patients (2291 pairs). Compared to warfarin, NOACs had a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE (hazard ratio (HR): 0.373, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.247-0.564,. Oral anticoagulation therapy with NOACs was found to be more effective than warfarin therapy among older adults with NVAF and comorbid DM.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Medicare; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

There is inadequate information on the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients who are under rivaroxaban and warfarin therapy in Iran. Determining the risk of GI bleeding in patients receiving these two drugs can help to select a more appropriate anti-coagulation prophylaxis in high-risk patients.. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of GI bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant bleeding risk factors receiving either warfarin or rivaroxaban.. In this observational study, 200 patients with AF and bleeding risk factors who referred to Imam Hossein Hospital (Tehran, Iran) were included. The patients were under treatment with either warfarin or rivaroxaban. The incidence of GI bleeding was compared between the two groups monthly for one year.. GI bleedings were observed in 61% and 34% of patients treated with warfarin and rivaroxaban, respectively (P = 0.001).Melena was the most common type of GI bleeding in both groups. History of hypertension, history of stroke, consumption of anti-platelet drugs, NSAID consumption, and history of alcohol consumption were associated with more frequent GI bleeding only in warfarin group.. The incidence of GI bleeding was lower in AF patients who received rivaroxaban compared to those treated with warfarin. Also, GI bleeding risk does not change according to the consumption of other anti-coagulant drugs and underlying history of hypertension or stroke in patients received rivaroxaban. Therefore, rivaroxaban is suggested as the choice of prophylaxisin patients with AF and concomitant coagulopathy.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Iran; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Real-world predictors of major bleeding (MB) have been well-studied among warfarin users, but not among all direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF). Thus, our goal was to build a predictive model of MB for new users of all oral anticoagulants (OAC) with AF.. We identified patients hospitalized for any cause and discharged alive in the community from 2011 to 2017 with a primary or secondary diagnosis of AF in Quebec's RAMQ and Med-Echo administrative databases. Cohort entry occurred at the first OAC claim. Patients were categorized according to OAC type. Outcomes were incident MB, gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), non-GI extracranial bleeding (NGIB) and intracranial bleeding within 1 year of follow-up. Covariates included age, sex, co-morbidities (within 3 years before cohort entry) and medication use (within 2 weeks before cohort entry). We used logistic-LASSO and adaptive logistic-LASSO regressions to identify MB predictors among OAC users. Discrimination and calibration were assessed for each model and a global model was selected. Subgroup analyses were performed for MB subtypes and OAC types.. Our cohort consisted of 14,741 warfarin, 3,722 dabigatran, 6,722 rivaroxaban and 11,196 apixaban users aged 70-86 years old. The important MB predictors were age, prior MB and liver disease with ORs ranging from 1.37-1.64. The final model had a c-statistic of 0.63 (95% CI 0.60-0.65) with adequate calibration. The GIB and NGIB models had similar c-statistics of 0.65 (95% CI 0.63-0.66) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.64-0.70), respectively.. MB and MB subtype predictors were similar among DOAC and warfarin users. The predictors selected by our models and their discriminative potential are concordant with published data. Thus, these models can be useful tools for future pharmacoepidemiologic studies involving older oral anticoagulant users with AF.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Regression Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in place of warfarin, but evidence about their effectiveness and safety in patients with valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) remains limited.. To assess the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with warfarin in patients with valvular AF.. New-user retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.. U.S.-based commercial health care database from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2019.. Adults with valvular AF who were newly prescribed DOACs or warfarin.. The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding.. Among a total of 56 336 patients with valvular AF matched on propensity score, use of DOACs (vs. warfarin) was associated with lower risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.70]) and major bleeding events (HR, 0.67 [CI, 0.63 to 0.72]). The results for the effectiveness and safety outcomes remained consistent for apixaban (HRs, 0.54 [CI, 0.47 to 0.61] and 0.52 [CI, 0.47 to 0.57], respectively) and rivaroxaban (HRs, 0.74 [CI, 0.64 to 0.86] and 0.87 [CI, 0.79 to 0.96], respectively); with dabigatran, results were consistent for the major bleeding outcome (HR, 0.81 [CI, 0.68 to 0.97]) but not for effectiveness (HR, 1.03 [CI, 0.81 to 1.31]).. Relatively short follow-up; inability to ascertain disease severity.. In this comparative effectiveness study using practice-based claims data, patients with valvular AF who were new users of DOACs had lower risks for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding than new users of warfarin. These data may be used to guide risk-benefit discussions regarding anticoagulant choices for patients with valvular AF.. None.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Embolism; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The optimal anticoagulant for end-stage renal disease patients for stroke prophylaxis is unknown. The efficacy and safety of warfarin in this population are debatable. In addition, real-world evidence of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with end-stage renal disease is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in Taiwanese patients with end-stage renal disease with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in a real-world setting.. This was a retrospective population-based cohort study conducted using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease who started on rivaroxaban or warfarin between February 2013 and September 2017 were eligible to participate in the study. The inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was used to balance baseline characteristics. Bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes were compared using competing risk analyses. The study population consisted of 3358 patients (173 and 3185 patients on rivaroxaban and warfarin, respectively). In the rivaroxaban group, 50.8%, 38.7%, and 10.4% of the patients received 10, 15, and 20 mg of the drug, respectively. The cumulative incidence of major bleeding was similar between the two groups; however, the gastrointestinal bleeding rate was lower in the rivaroxaban group (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.91) than in the warfarin group. Furthermore, the composite risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban group (adjusted SHR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.17-0.79). Similar findings were observed for patients who received 10 mg of rivaroxaban.. In Taiwanese patients with end-stage renal disease and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban may be associated with a similar risk of major bleeding but a lower risk of thromboembolism compared with warfarin. The potential benefit of 10 mg of rivaroxaban in this population requires further investigation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Taiwan; Thromboembolism; Warfarin; Young Adult

Atrial fibrillation is a major cause of death and disability due to stroke. Vitamin K antagonist drugs are effective for prevention, but they have a narrow therapeutic range and multiple pharmacological interactions. In recent years, new therapeutic alternatives have been searched to minimize complications. The main objective is to evaluate the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in anticoagulated patients and compare the classic treatment with new anticoagulants.. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to determine the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients treated with acenocoumarol/dabigatran/rivaroxaban, between 2012 and 2016. We compared the classic with the new anticoagulant group, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determinate the risk factors of gastrointestinal bleeding.. A total of 1213 patients were selected, 52.7% male patients, a mean age of 72.6 years old (± 14.563). 73.6% had atrial fibrilation. 14.5% of patients used acetylsalicylic acid, and 4% clopidogrel. 67.2% had a high-risk CHADS-2 Score, and 36.9% a high-risk HAS-BLED Score. We determined a 5.6% (68) of gastrointestinal bleeding, without differences according to anticoagulant used. The multivariate model showed a greater risk for digestive hemorrhage in patients with a previous hemorrhagic event (odds ratio [OR] = 2.422 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.101-5.327) and the concomitant therapy with clopidogrel (OR = 2.373 95% CI: 0.996-5.652).. No differences were found in the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding between the different anticoagulants. A previous gastrointestinal bleeding were considered independent risk factor. The HAS-BLED score should be taken into account to make clinical decisions about to prescribe anticoagulant treatment.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to reduce the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on oral anticoagulants, and patients are increasingly on oral anticoagulants and PPI co-therapy. However, evidence is lacking on the safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants when co-administered with PPIs.. Among patients initiating oral anticoagulants (warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants [NOACs], i.e. rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban) during 2013-2017, those concomitantly prescribed PPIs were identified (n = 19,851). The primary endpoint was hospitalization for major upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and secondary endpoints were death and ischemic stroke.. During a mean 1.4 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 512 (2.58%) patients. Overall, NOACs were associated with lower upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk after adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities and concomitant medications (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.94), compared to warfarin. There was no significant difference in upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk among the individual NOACs. This trend of reduced risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in NOACs compared to warfarin was consistent for both regular and reduced doses, throughout bleeding risk groups, and other subgroup analyses. NOACs were also associated with lower risk of death compared to warfarin. The risk for ischemic stroke was not significantly different among the oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.. In patients on oral anticoagulant and PPI co-therapy, NOACs were associated with lower risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality compared to warfarin, while there was no difference among the oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention. In patients on PPI therapy, NOACs may preferred over warfarin for decreasing risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Ischemic Stroke; Male; Middle Aged; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Republic of Korea; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Upper Gastrointestinal Tract; Warfarin

Many patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are at a high risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding due to conditions including older age; stage III to V chronic kidney disease (CKD); HAS-BLED (hypertension, kidney or liver disease, stroke history, prior bleeding, unstable international normalized ratio, age >65, drug or alcohol use) score of 3 or greater; corticosteroid, antiplatelet or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use; or GI conditions.. To compare the risk of stroke and/or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among patients with NVAF and high risk of GI bleeding who received non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs those who received warfarin.. This retrospective cohort study included patients with NVAF who were 75 years and older; had stage III to V CKD; had an HAS-BLED score of 3 or greater; used corticosteroids, antiplatelets, or NSAIDs; or had GI conditions. Data were collected from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and 4 commercial insurance databases between January 1, 2012, and September 30, 2015. Data analysis was conducted from January 2012 to September 2015.. New prescription for apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin between January 1, 2013, and September 30, 2015 (identification period).. Six propensity score-matched cohorts were created to compare between study drugs. For the primary objective, Cox models were used to estimate stroke and/or SE and MB hazard ratios (HRs).. A total of 381 054 patients (187 489 [49.2%] women) with NVAF and at least 1 high-risk GI bleeding factor were identified (HAS-BLED score ≥3: 284 527 [74.7%]; aged ≥75 years: 252 835 [66.4%]; corticosteroid, antiplatelet, or NSAID therapy: 107 675 [28.3%]; prior GI bleeding conditions: 74 818 [19.6%]; and stage III-V CKD: 56 892 [14.9%]). All NOACs were associated with a lower risk of stroke and/or SE vs warfarin (apixaban: HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.52-0.68; dabigatran: HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64-0.88; rivaroxaban: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.86). Compared with warfarin, apixaban and dabigatran were associated with a lower risk of MB (apixaban: HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.56-0.63; dabigatran: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.86), while rivaroxaban was associated with a higher risk (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16).. In this study of patients with NVAF and high risk of GI bleed, NOACs were associated with lower rates of stroke and/or SE, but NOACs had varying risks of MB compared with warfarin. These results may help inform treatment options in this patient population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; United States; Warfarin

Clinical experience with using activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCCs) to reverse the effects of factor Xa inhibitors is limited.. Our objective was to assess the achievement of effective clinical hemostasis using aPCC in patients on chronic apixaban or rivaroxaban therapy presenting with major bleeding in whom a reversal agent is warranted. We also assessed the safety of the drug.. A retrospective medical records review was conducted at a tertiary referral medical center in the USA. Patients presenting with major bleeding while receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban and treated with aPCC were included. Clinical hemostasis was assessed using International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Scientific and Standardization Subcommittee criteria.. A total of 35 patients were included in the study. The most common site of bleeding was intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (n = 18 [51.4%]), followed by gastrointestinal bleed (n = 10 [28.6%]). Clinical hemostasis was achieved in 24 (68.6%) patients; 11 patients (31.4%) did not achieve clinical hemostasis; nine of these patients had ICH. Seven of the patients who did not achieve hemostasis died during hospitalization. Three (8.6%) patients experienced thromboembolic events during hospitalization. In total, 21 (60%) patients were receiving concomitant medications that interact with anti-factor Xa inhibitors and can increase the risk of bleeding.. Our study suggests that aPCC could be an option in patients with major bleeding associated with apixaban or rivaroxaban. It may be an alternative for patients who need anticoagulation reversal if the specific antidote, andexanet alfa, is unavailable.

Topics: Aged; Antidotes; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Survival Analysis; Thrombosis; United States

In 2018, the FDA approved andexanet alfa for the reversal of life-threatening hemorrhages in patients anticoagulated with apixaban or rivaroxaban. Yet, cost-effective factor Xa inhibitor reversal remains controversial. The objective of this study was to describe real world utilization of andexanet alfa.. This was a retrospective case series of patients receiving andexanet alfa between July 28, 2018 and April 29, 2019 at a large academic health system. Baseline demographics, anticoagulant type and reversal, as well as brain imaging were collected. Primary endpoints were stability of hematoma for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and hemostatic effectiveness for patients undergoing surgical procedures. Secondary endpoints were thromboembolism and 30 day mortality.. Of the 25 patients evaluated, 13 received andexanet alfa for ICH. Eleven of the 13 had follow-up imaging available and stability was observed in 90.9%. Three patients received andexanet alfa for reversal prior to surgical procedures, and 100% hemostatic effectiveness was achieved. Nine patients received andexanet alfa for reversal of extracranial bleeding, including gastrointestinal bleed (n=4). There were no thrombotic events in our cohort, and 30 day mortality was 24%. Sixty-four percent of patients would have met exclusion criteria for the ANNEXA-4 trial.. This is the largest series to date describing real-world utilization of andexanet alfa. Our series showed hemostatic efficacy in 90.9% of patients with ICH, and 100% in patients undergoing surgical procedures. There were no thrombotic complications. Yet, larger and comparative studies are needed to clarify the optimal agent and patient selection for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Treatment Outcome

Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) carry a lower bleeding risk compared with warfarin, gastrointestinal bleeds (GIB) are a known complication. There are limited data observing outcomes associated with resuming DOACs following a GIB.. The purpose of this study was to evaluate practice patterns and clinical outcomes of patients admitted with an index GIB while receiving DOAC therapy.. This retrospective, single-system study included adult patients receiving DOAC therapy prior to admission and hospitalized with an index GIB between January 1, 2013, and October 31, 2018. Patient exclusion criteria were a history of immune thrombocytopenia purpura or inflammatory bowel disease; discharge to hospice; leaving against medical advice; or death during hospitalization. The primary objective was 90-day readmission for a recurrent GIB.. There were 57 patients included for analysis; 37 patients had DOAC therapy held >7 days, 18 patients resumed DOAC therapy within 7 days, and 2 patients switched to warfarin. The majority of patients received rivaroxaban (59.6%) prior to admission for atrial fibrillation (71.9%), were admitted with a major GIB (66.7%), and required a blood transfusion (61.4%). The rates of recurrent GIB were 2.5% (n = 1) and 5.6% (n = 1) for those who had their DOAC held and resumed, respectively (. Resuming anticoagulation within 7 days of admission for an index GIB was not associated with a recurrent GIB within 90 days of discharge.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Middle Aged; Patient Readmission; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Black patients are under-represented in randomized trials evaluating oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in African Americans with NVAF.. We performed an analysis using Optum® De-Identified Electronic Health Record (EHR) data from 1/1/2012-9/30/2018. We included adult African American patients with a diagnosis of NVAF who were anticoagulant-naïve during the 12-months prior to initiation of rivaroxaban or warfarin. Patients receiving rivaroxaban were 1:1 propensity score matched to warfarin patients. Our primary effectiveness and safety outcomes were the 2-year incidence rates (%/year) of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleeding using an intention-to-treat approach. Cohorts were compared using doubly-robust Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. We matched 4102 rivaroxaban and 4102 warfarin users with a median (interquartile range) available follow-up of 2.0 (0.9, 2.0) years. Median CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED scores were 3 (2, 4) and 2 (1, 3). Rivaroxaban use was associated with a lower risk of SSE (1.99 versus 2.48, HR = 0.77, 95%CI = 0.60-0.99), ischemic stroke (1.84 versus 2.37, HR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.59-0.98) and major bleeding (4.22 versus 4.98, HR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.70-0.99). No differences in intracranial hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding were observed. Neither sensitivity analyses utilizing an on-treatment methodology nor inverse probability-of-treatment weighting showed significant differences in SSE or major bleeding between rivaroxaban and warfarin users.. Rivaroxaban appeared at least as effective and safe as warfarin when used to manage African American patients with NVAF in routine practice.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Black or African American; Embolism; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Two dogs with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia complicated with thromboembolism were presented. Both of the dogs were initially treated with immunosuppressive therapy in conjunction with dalteparin and clopidogrel. Although the immunosuppressive therapy was effective, peritoneal effusion due to thromboembolism was observed during the course of the disease in these dogs. After initiation of rivaroxaban treatment, peritoneal effusion decreased immediately in parallel with the normalization of D-dimer, antithrombin (AT), and thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT). Hematochezia, cutaneous hemorrhage, and hematuria were observed as adverse events after administration of rivaroxaban in one case. Rivaroxaban was effective for the control of thromboembolism secondary to immune-mediated hemolytic anemia, and D-dimer, AT, and TAT were useful to monitor the status of thromboembolic disease in dogs.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Comparative gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) risk between rivaroxaban and low-dose aspirin is unknown in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study investigated GIB risk with rivaroxaban vs aspirin among two separate AF cohorts in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom, using a common protocol approach.. This was a population-based cohort study using separate data from the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority (2010-2018) and The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database in the United Kingdom (2011-2017). Patients with AF newly prescribed aspirin or rivaroxaban were included. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare GIB risks for rivaroxaban vs aspirin, accounting for confounders using propensity score fine stratification approach.. In CDARS, 29 213 patients were included; n = 1052 (rivaroxaban), n = 28 161 (aspirin). Crude GIB event rates per 100 patient-years in CDARS were 3.0 (aspirin) and 2.6 (rivaroxaban). No difference in GIB risk was observed between rivaroxaban and aspirin overall (HR = 1.04, 95%CI = 0.76-1.42), and in dose-stratified analyses (HR = 1.21, 95%CI = 0.84-1.74 [20 mg/day]; HR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.44-1.45 [≤15 mg/day]). In THIN, 11 549 patients were included, n = 3496 (rivaroxaban) and n = 8053 (aspirin). Crude GIB event rates were 1.3 (aspirin) and 2.4 (rivaroxaban) per 100 patient-years. No difference in GIB risk was observed between rivaroxaban and aspirin overall (HR = 1.40, 95%CI = 1.00-1.98) and low-dose rivaroxaban (≤15 mg/day) (HR = 1.00, 95%CI = 0.56-1.30), but increased GIB risk was observed for rivaroxaban 20 mg/day vs aspirin (HR = 1.57, 95%CI = 1.08-2.29).. In patients with AF, GIB risk was comparable between aspirin and rivaroxaban ≤15 mg/day. GIB risk for rivaroxaban 20 mg/day vs aspirin remains uncertain and warrants further investigation.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Controversy exists regarding first-line use of the recently approved reversal agent andexanet alfa due to limitations of the ANEXXA-4 study, thrombotic risks, and high medication acquisition cost. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 4F-PCC for the reversal of emergent oral fXa inhibitor-related bleeding. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate a subgroup using strict ANNEXA-4 patient selection criteria.. This was a retrospective study conducted utilizing chart review of adult patients that received 4F-PCC for oral fXa inhibitor-related bleeding. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinical success defined as achieving excellent or good hemostatic effectiveness following the administration of 4F-PCC. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality and arterial/venous thromboembolism, and cost compared with andexanet alfa.. A total of 119 patients were included, with 83 patients in the ANNEXA-4 criteria subgroup. Eighty-five of the 119 patients (71%) required reversal due to intracranial bleeding. Prior to reversal, 70 patients (59%) were taking apixaban and 49 patients (41%) were taking rivaroxaban. Clinical success was achieved in 106 of 119 patients (89%) and 74 of 83 patients (90%) in the strict criteria subgroup. Three of 119 patients (2.5%) had a thrombotic event during hospital stay and the overall mortality rate was 13%. The average cost increase of andexanet alfa compared to 4F-PCC would have been $29,500 per patient.. Administration of 4F-PCC for the reversal of oral fXa inhibitors was effective with relatively low thrombotic risk. Further direct prospective comparison of 4F-PCC to andexanet alfa is warranted.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antidotes; Blood Coagulation Factors; Drug Costs; Emergencies; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome

Up to 10% of the >3 million Americans with atrial fibrillation will experience an acute coronary syndrome or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. Therefore, concurrent indications for multiple antithrombotic agents is a common clinical scenario. Although each helps reduce thrombotic risk, their combined use significantly increases the risk of major bleeding events, which can be life threatening. In the past 5 years, a number of randomized clinical trials have explored different combinations of anticoagulation plus antiplatelet agents aimed at minimizing bleeding risk while preserving low thrombotic event rates. In general, shorter courses with fewer antithrombotic agents have been found to be effective, particularly when direct oral anticoagulants are combined with clopidogrel. Combined use of very low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin has also demonstrated benefit in atherosclerotic diseases, including coronary and peripheral artery disease. Use of proton pump inhibitor therapy while patients are taking multiple antithrombotic agents has the potential to further reduce upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk in select populations. Applying this evidence to patients with multiple thrombotic conditions will help to avoid costly and life-threatening adverse medication events.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban

Clinical trials have indicated that the direct-acting oral anticoagulants dabigatran and rivaroxaban have better risk/benefit profiles than do vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. Our objective was to compare the 1-year real-life risk of major clinical events with dabigatran or rivaroxaban versus VKAs for NVAF.. This was a high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS)-matched cohort study of new users of dabigatran, rivaroxaban or VKAs for NVAF in the French national healthcare systems database in 2013 followed-up for 1 year [22]. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for clinical events and death were determined during exposure.. In 2013, a total of 103,101 new anticoagulant users had definite NVAF: 44,653 VKA, 27,060 dabigatran, and 31,388 rivaroxaban. In matched populations, HRs were as follows for dabigatran versus VKAs (20,489 per group): stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) 0.75 (95% CI 0.63-0.88), clinically relevant bleeding (CRB) 0.58 (95% CI 0.51-0.66), hemorrhagic stroke (HS) 0.22 (95% CI 0.14-0.36), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) 0.98 (95% CI 0.80-1.19), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) 0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.95), death 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.82), composite (any of the above) 0.71 (95% CI 0.66-0.76). For matched rivaroxaban versus VKA (23,053 per group) HRs were as follows: SSE 0.98 (95% CI 0.85-1.14), CRB 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.92), HS 0.65 (95% CI 0.49-0.87), GIB 1.08 (95% CI 0.90-1.30), ACS 0.84 (95% CI 0.71-1.00), death 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.84), composite 0.84 (95% CI 0.79-0.89). Numbers needed to treat to observe one fewer death were 49 ± 0.05 with dabigatran or rivaroxaban versus VKAs.. Consistent with results from clinical trials and other observational studies, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were at least as effective and safer than VKAs for the prevention of thromboembolic events in NVAF over 1 year in the French population.. European Medicines Agency EUPAS 13017 (www.encepp.eu) Clinicaltrials.gov id NCT02785354.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Data Systems; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Propensity Score; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K

The purpose of the study was to examine the association between the type of preceding oral anticoagulant use (warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) and in-hospital mortality among patients admitted with gastrointestinal bleeding.. In this observational cohort study, all patients admitted with a first-time gastrointestinal bleeding from January 2011 to March 2017 while receiving any oral anticoagulant therapy prior to admission were identified using data from Danish nationwide registries. The risk of in-hospital mortality according to type of oral anticoagulation therapy was examined by multivariable logistic regression models.. Among 5,774 patients admitted with gastrointestinal bleeding (median age, 78 years [25th-75th percentile, 71-85 years]; 56.8% men), 2,038 (35.3%) were receiving DOACs and 3,736 (64.7%) were receiving warfarin prior to admission. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates were 7.5% for DOAC (7.2% for dabigatran, 6.4% for rivaroxaban, and 10.1% for apixaban) and 6.5% for warfarin. After adjustment for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, there was no statistically significant difference in in-hospital mortality between prior use of any DOAC and warfarin (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.18 [95% CI 0.95-1.45], adjusted OR 0.97 [95% CI 0.77-1.24]). Similar results were found for each individual DOAC as compared with warfarin (dabigatran: unadjusted OR 1.12 [95% CI 0.84-1.49], adjusted OR 0.96 [95% CI 0.71-1.30]); rivaroxaban: unadjusted OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.71-1.37], adjusted OR 0.84 [95% CI 0.59-1.21]; and apixaban: unadjusted OR 1.62 [95% CI 0.84-1.49], adjusted OR 1.22 [95% CI 0.83-1.79]).. Among patients admitted with gastrointestinal bleeding, there was no statistically significant difference in in-hospital mortality between prior use of DOAC and warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Denmark; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; United States; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) continue to be the standard of long-term anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants(DOAC) are increasingly used. In many trials DOAC were at least as effective as VKA. In this study we evaluate the bleeding profiles, frequencies and etiologies of patients receiving DOAC versus VKA in a real-life setting. All patients presenting with suspected gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in the emergency department of the University Hospital Erlangen in one year were enrolled in this study. They were looked up for the intake of either DOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) or VKA. The results showed that 406 patients with suspected GIB were admitted to the emergency unit of the University Hospital Erlangen. In 228 of those patients GIB could be verified (56.2%). Fifty four of those patients (23.7%) were administered either VKA or DOAC. In 35 of those 54 patients (64.8%) GIB was classified as 'major bleeding'. In 27 patients with administration of VKA upper GIB was recorded and lower GIB was detected four times. In 16 patients with administration of DOAC upper GIB was found and lower GIB was found in 7 patients. The presented data do not show higher GIB rates for DOAC (mainly dabigatran and rivaroxaban), but do also not indicate a significantly higher safety of DOAC concerning GIB than VKA. This finding represents a clear contrast to the reduced bleeding rates of DOAC for intracerebral bleeding and other non-GIB events. According to our study, the absolute number of DOAC-associated GIB events is lower than in the VKA group.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K; Young Adult

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of validation on the identification of major bleeding events in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy.. Patients aged 2 to 89 years with a first prescription for an anticoagulant (rivaroxaban or warfarin) between 2012 and 2015 were identified in THIN. Major bleeding events, defined as bleeding events necessitating hospitalization or referral to accident and emergency services or a specialist clinic, were identified using a 2-step ascertainment process based on read codes only, and then validated using a 2-step process requiring manual review of patients' records.. The positive predictive value for the ascertainment of major intracranial (IC) bleeds using only read codes was 96.9%, compared with 70.4% for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds and 64.1% for urogenital (UG) bleeds. The incidence rate of major IC bleeding events was therefore similar when it was calculated before and after validation (0.32 per 100 person-years and 0.31 per 100 person-years, respectively). The incidence rate of major GI bleeds identified using read codes alone was reduced following validation from 2.05 to 0.94 per 100 person-years, and that of major UG bleeds decreased from 2.45 to 1.11 per 100 person-years.. Major GI and UG bleeding events ascertained from THIN using read codes require validation using additional information to prevent outcome misclassification. The absence of validation may lead to overestimated incidence rates of major bleeding for GI and UG bleeds.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Child; Child, Preschool; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Female Urogenital Diseases; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Male Urogenital Diseases; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Primary Health Care; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Validation Studies as Topic; Warfarin; Young Adult

Proton pump inhibition (PPI) reduces gastrointestinal bleeding on direct oral anticoagulants. However, PPI may affect dabigatran on-treatment levels; and there is no information regarding the effect of PPI on xabans on-treatment activity. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the impact of PPI on therapeutic anti-Xa activity in rivaroxaban- and apixaban-treated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This single-centre pilot prospective study enrolled 77 consecutive xabans-treated patients (42 rivaroxaban-treated and 35 apixaban-treated patients) with AF. PPI was administrated in 44 patients. Trough and peak anti-Xa activity was assessed with factor Xa-calibrated anti-Xa chromogenic analysis. There were no significant differences in trough anti-Xa activity comparing PPI-treated patients and patients without PPI (80.5 ± 66.5 ng/mL in PPI group vs. 71.6 ± 64.1 ng/mL in non-PPI group, p = 0.57, Table 2). Similarly, there were no significant differences in peak anti-Xa activity between compared groups (175.2 ± 102.5 ng/mL in PPI group vs. 202.9 ± 84.1 ng/mL in non-PPI group, p = 0.21). This pilot study did not reveal significant changes in xabans on-treatment anti-Xa activity according the PPI status.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in routine clinical practice.. This retrospective cohort study used linked administrative data. The study population (n = 14 577) included patients with a diagnosis of AF (confirmed in hospital) who initiated DOAC treatment in Scotland between August 2011 and December 2015. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios of thromboembolic events, mortality and bleeding events.. No differences between the DOACs were observed with regard to the risk of stroke, systemic embolism or cardiovascular death. In contrast, the risk of myocardial infarction was higher among patients prescribed apixaban in comparison to those on rivaroxaban (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.02-2.71), and all-cause mortality was higher among rivaroxaban patients in contrast to both apixaban (1.22 [1.01-1.47]) and dabigatran (1.55 [1.16-2.05]) patients; rivaroxaban patients also had a higher risk of pulmonary embolism than apixaban patients (5.27 [1.79-15.53]). The risk of other major bleeds was higher among rivaroxaban patients compared to apixaban (1.50 [1.10-2.03]) and dabigatran (1.58 [1.01-2.48]) patients; the risks of gastrointestinal bleeds and overall bleeding were higher among rivaroxaban patients than among apixaban patients (1.48 [1.01-2.16] and 1.52 [1.21-1.92], respectively).. All DOACs were similarly effective in preventing strokes and systemic embolisms, while patients being treated with rivaroxaban exhibited the highest bleeding risks. Observed differences in the risks of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism warrant further research.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Scotland; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) for management of major bleeding events (MBE) in 344 patients receiving the anticoagulants rivaroxaban, apixaban or warfarin during the period January 2016 to April 2018. Median (range) PCC dose was 2000 units (1000-4500). Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) was the most common indication (137/344, 39·8%) for PCC use followed by gastrointestinal bleeding (93/344, 27%). ICH patients more frequently received rivaroxaban (62·5%) or apixaban (52·5%) compared to warfarin (34·5%), P = 0·002; and visceral bleeding patients received warfarin more frequently (24·2%) than rivaroxaban (5%) or apixaban (10%), P = 0·003. Median rivaroxaban and apixaban levels were 230 ng/ml (47-759) and 159 ng/ml (45-255). Median International Normalised Ratio pre- and post-PCC in patients on warfarin were 3·4 (1·9-15·4) and 1·2 (1·0-1·9). Blood products use was the same between groups. Thirty-day mortality and re-bleeding rates in patients with ICH were 35% (P = 0·50) and 18% (P = 0·90) with no differences between the groups. Thrombosis occurred in 4·1% patients within 30 days with no difference between groups. Two of 91 (2·2%) patients with ICH only (both on warfarin) had ischaemic strokes within 30 days post-PCC. In conclusion, there was no difference in the safety (thrombosis) or efficacy (30-day mortality, re-bleeding) in use of PCC for MBE in patients on warfarin, rivaroxaban or apixaban.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Coagulation Factors; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Survival Rate; Warfarin

Direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used as off-label alternatives to vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of left ventricular (LV) thrombus. However, efficacy data is limited to small case series and one meta-analysis of case reports. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of DOACs in treatment of LV thrombus utilizing transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and clinical outcomes. We identified 52 patients (mean age = 64 years, 71% men) treated with a DOAC for LV thrombus (n = 26 apixaban, n = 24 rivaroxaban, and n = 2 dabigatran). Thirty-five of the 52 patients had a follow-up TTE after DOAC initiation. The primary end point was defined as resolution of LV thrombus (in patients with a subsequent TTE), or death, major bleeding requiring transfusion, intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, or peripheral embolization. An experienced echocardiographer (M.L.M.) reviewed all TTEs for presence or absence of LV thrombus without knowledge of time point or clinical data. Twenty-nine of the 35 (83%) patients who underwent follow-up TTE had resolution of LV thrombus, with a mean duration of 264 days. Of the total study population, there was 1 cardioembolic event (transient ischemic attack) 52 days after initiating DOAC, 3 gastrointestinal bleeds requiring transfusion, and 1 patient with epistaxis requiring transfusion. All patients with a hemorrhagic complication were receiving concomitant antiplatelet therapy. DOAC therapy appears promising for the treatment of LV thrombus. A larger, prospective study is warranted to confirm these results.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Transfusion; Dabigatran; Echocardiography; Epistaxis; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors, used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism treatment and prevention, are the dominant non-Vitamin K oral anticoagulants on the market. While major bleeding may be less common with these agents compared to warfarin, it is always a risk, and little has been published on the most serious bleeding scenarios. This study describes a cohort of patients with FXa inhibitor-associated life-threatening bleeding events, their clinical characteristics, interventions and outcomes.. We performed a retrospective, 5-center review of FXa inhibitor-treated major bleeding patients. Investigators identified potential cases by cross-referencing ICD-9/10 codes for hemorrhage with medication lists. Investigators selected cases they deemed to require immediate reversal of coagulopathy, and reviewed charts for characteristics, reversal strategies and other interventions, and outcomes.. A total of 56 charts met the inclusion criteria for the retrospective cohort, including 29 (52%) gastrointestinal bleeds (GIB), 19 (34%) intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) and 8 (14%) others. Twenty-four (43%) patients received various factor or plasma products, and the remainder received supportive care. Thirty-day mortality was 21% (n=12). Re-anticoagulation within 30-days occurred in 23 (41%) patients. Thromboembolic events (TEEs) occurred in 6 (11%) patients. No differences were observed in outcomes by treatment strategy.. This cohort of FXa inhibitor-associated major bleeding scenarios deemed appropriate for acute anticoagulant reversal illustrates the variable approaches in the absence of a specific reversal agent.

Topics: Aged; Blood Coagulation Factors; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Plasma; Platelet Transfusion; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which have gained approval for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and treatment of venous thromboembolism, have become increasingly preferred over warfarin given their predictable pharmacodynamics, lack of required monitoring, and superior outcomes. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants have been shown to be associated with an increased frequency of gastrointestinal bleeding compared with warfarin, but the severity and characteristics of gastrointestinal bleeding in these patients is poorly understood.. We retrospectively evaluated electronic medical records of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 8496) from 2010-2016. We identified 61 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding episodes while treated with DOACs (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or apixaban) and 123 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding while taking warfarin. We randomly selected a control group of 296 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding who were not receiving anticoagulation treatment from the same sample. Outcomes included the need for hospitalization, blood transfusion, endoscopic or surgical intervention, and 30-day mortality.. The DOAC and warfarin groups were similar in terms of age and underlying comorbidity (assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index), but the DOAC group had greater concomitant aspirin use. Gastrointestinal bleeding was classified as upper (n = 186), lower (n = 88), anorectal (n = 183), small bowel (n = 9), and indeterminate (n = 14). After adjusting for differences in baseline variables, the DOAC group had fewer hospitalizations and required fewer transfusions than the warfarin group. The DOAC and control groups were not statistically different for all outcomes. There were no significant mortality differences among groups.. Although prior studies have shown a higher frequency of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients treated with DOACs compared with warfarin, our data suggest that gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking DOACs may be less severe. These differences occurred despite significantly greater concomitant aspirin use in the DOAC group compared with warfarin users.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Arteriovenous Malformations; Aspirin; Blood Transfusion; Case-Control Studies; Dabigatran; Diverticulum; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhoids; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peptic Ulcer; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

The US Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel system developed tools for sequential surveillance.. In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, we sequentially compared outcomes for new users of rivaroxaban versus warfarin, employing propensity score matching and Cox regression. A total of 36 173 rivaroxaban and 79 520 warfarin initiators were variable-ratio matched within 2 monitoring periods.. Statistically significant signals were observed for ischemic stroke (IS) (first period) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (second period) favoring rivaroxaban, and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) (second period) favoring warfarin. In follow-up analyses using primary position diagnoses from inpatient encounters for increased definition specificity, the hazard ratios (HR) for rivaroxaban vs warfarin new users were 0.61 (0.47, 0.79) for IS, 1.47 (1.29, 1.67) for GIB, and 0.71 (0.50, 1.01) for ICH. For GIB, the HR varied by age: <66 HR = 0.88 (0.60, 1.30) and 66+ HR = 1.49 (1.30, 1.71).. This study demonstrates the capability of Sentinel to conduct prospective safety monitoring and raises no new concerns about rivaroxaban safety.

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Infarction; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Warfarin

Oral factor Xa inhibitors are increasingly used for anticoagulation, but there is no approved reversal agent. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) for the management of Xa-inhibitor-associated bleeding has been described in small case series and one cohort study. Patients on apixaban or rivaroxaban, suffering a major bleed, were treated at nine Canadian hospitals as per existing hospital protocol with a fixed dose of PCC 2,000 units and subsequently recruited for a 30-day follow-up. The treating physician evaluated the haemostatic effectiveness as observed during the first day as good, moderate or poor/none, using an assessment guide. Safety outcomes were thromboembolism or death. We recruited 66 patients with major bleeding who were treated with PCC and who were receiving rivaroxaban (56%) or apixaban (44%). The effectiveness was assessed as good in 65% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53-77), moderate in 20% (95% CI, 10-30) and poor/none in 15% (95% CI, 6-24). For the 36 patients with intracranial haemorrhage, the corresponding ratings were 67, 17 and 17%, and for 16 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding they were 69, 12 and 19%, respectively. There were nine deaths (14%) by 30 days, and five (8%) major thromboembolic events. In a

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Coagulation Factors; Canada; Coagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Clinical variables including hypertension could be linked with major bleeding events and death beyond vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) or direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs) treatment strategy.. Subgroup analysis of major bleeding (primary endpoint) associated with clinical variables, site of bleeding, ongoing antithrombotics, reversal treatment or blood transfusion, outcomes (secondary endpoints) was performed in patients with bleeding events submitted to hard 5:1 propensity-score matching for hypertension.. Enrolled patients were 2,792 (mean age, 65.6 ± 19.9 years) during 2-year survey including 166,000 visits, of 200,000 inhabitants catchment area; 8,239 patients received warfarin and 3,797 DOACs. Hypertension account for 1,077 (39%) patients; major bleeding for 474 (17%); death for 29 (1%), and 72 (3%) on 1-month and 1-year, respectively. Hypertension, age, glucose, cancer, ischemic vascular disease, and CHA2D2VASc score were more likely to link with major bleeding. On multivariate analysis, only age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; P < 0.001), CHA2DS2VASc score ≥ 2 (OR, 2.14; P = 0.001), and glucose (OR, 1.01; P = 0.005) were predictors of major bleeding. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated patients with hypertension as compared with patients without showed 60% versus 20% death on 1-month (P < 0.001). Warfarin compared with DOACs was more likely to present with major bleeding (0.7% versus 0.2%; OR, 2.8; P = 0.005). Receiver operator characteristics analysis showed high value (0.61) of age and glucose over creatinine and systolic arterial pressure (P = NS).. Four in 10 patients with major bleeding showed hypertension; of these 8 in 10 will die within 1 month. Warfarin compared with DOACs was more likely to present with major bleeding.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Blood Glucose; Blood Transfusion; Cardiovascular Diseases; Creatinine; Dabigatran; Emergency Service, Hospital; Epistaxis; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hematuria; Hemoptysis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hypertension; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Odds Ratio; Prognosis; Propensity Score; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Factors; Thiazoles; Warfarin

Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been proposed as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients but the comparative benefits between NOACs and optimally anticoagulated patients is unknown. We estimated the absolute benefit in clinical outcomes rates of real-world effect of NOACs in optimally anticoagulated AF patients with acenocoumarol. We included 1,361 patients stable on acenocoumarol with time in therapeutic range of 100% and 6.5 years of follow-up. Estimation of clinical events avoided was calculated applying hazard ratio, absolute and relative risk reduction from the real-world meta-analysis. Compared with an optimally anticoagulated population, dabigatran 110 mg had the highest estimated stroke reduction (0.97%/year vs 1.47%/year; p = 0.002), and the benefit was higher than in RE-LY trial. For major bleeding, apixaban showed the highest estimated reduction (1.81%/year vs 2.83%/year; p <0.001). For mortality, the largest estimated reduction was with apixaban (2.68%/year). For gastrointestinal bleeding, only apixaban had a significant reduction compared with acenocoumarol (0.69%/year vs 1.10%/year; p = 0.004), and the reduction was significantly higher than in ARISTOTLE trial. All NOACs showed significantly lower rates for intracranial hemorrhage and had a positive Net Clinical Benefit compared with acenocoumarol. Apixaban showed the highest extended estimated Net Clinical Benefit 2.64 (95%CI 2.34 to 2.96). In conclusion, in optimally acenocoumarol anticoagulated AF patients, estimated reductions in all clinical outcomes with various NOACs are evident, with the best effectiveness and safety profile with apixaban. Indeed, the estimated effect with "real world" NOACs would probably be higher than that seen in phase-III clinical trials.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Spain; Stroke

Background Patients with impaired liver function ( ILF ) were excluded from clinical trials that investigated non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants ( NOAC s) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOAC s in atrial fibrillation patients with ILF . Methods and Results A cohort study based on electronic medical records was conducted from 2009 to 2016 at a multicenter healthcare provider in Taiwan and included 6451 anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients (aged 76.7±7.0 years, 52.5% male). Patients were classified into 2 subgroups: patients with normal liver function (n=5818) and patients with ILF (n=633, 9.8%). Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the risks of thromboembolism, bleeding, and death associated with use of NOAC s and warfarin in patients with normal liver function and ILF , respectively. In patients with normal liver function, compared with warfarin therapy (n=2928), NOAC therapy (n=4048) was associated with significantly lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.88; P<0.001) and death (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.80; P<0.001) with no difference in major bleeding or gastrointestinal bleeding. In patients with ILF , compared with warfarin therapy (n=394), NOAC therapy (n=342) was associated with significantly lower risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.83; P<0.001), but no difference in stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, or gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusions In atrial fibrillation patients with ILF , NOAC therapy and warfarin therapy were associated with similar risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Hepatic Insufficiency; Humans; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Anticoagulant choice and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) cotherapy could affect the risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, a frequent and potentially serious complication of oral anticoagulant treatment.. To compare the incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in patients using individual anticoagulants with and without PPI cotherapy, and to determine variation according to underlying gastrointestinal bleeding risk.. Retrospective cohort study in Medicare beneficiaries between January 1, 2011, and September 30, 2015.. Apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin with or without PPI cotherapy.. Hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding: adjusted incidence and risk difference (RD) per 10 000 person-years of anticoagulant treatment, incidence rate ratios (IRRs).. There were 1 643 123 patients with 1 713 183 new episodes of oral anticoagulant treatment included in the cohort (mean [SD] age, 76.4 [2.4] years, 651 427 person-years of follow-up [56.1%] were for women, and the indication was atrial fibrillation for 870 330 person-years [74.9%]). During 754 389 treatment person-years without PPI cotherapy, the adjusted incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (n = 7119) was 115 per 10 000 person-years (95% CI, 112-118). The incidence for rivaroxaban (n = 1278) was 144 per 10 000 person-years (95% CI, 136-152), which was significantly greater than the incidence of hospitalizations for apixaban (n = 279; 73 per 10 000 person-years; IRR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.73-2.25]; RD, 70.9 [95% CI, 59.1-82.7]), dabigatran (n = 629; 120 per 10 000 person-years; IRR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08-1.32]; RD, 23.4 [95% CI, 10.6-36.2]), and warfarin (n = 4933; 113 per 10 000 person-years; IRR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.19-1.35]; RD, 30.4 [95% CI, 20.3-40.6]). The incidence for apixaban was significantly lower than that for dabigatran (IRR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.52-0.70]; RD, -47.5 [95% CI,-60.6 to -34.3]) and warfarin (IRR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57-0.73]; RD, -40.5 [95% CI, -50.0 to -31.0]). When anticoagulant treatment with PPI cotherapy (264 447 person-years; 76 per 10 000 person-years) was compared with treatment without PPI cotherapy, risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding hospitalizations (n = 2245) was lower overall (IRR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.62-0.69]) and for apixaban (IRR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.52-0.85]; RD, -24 [95% CI, -38 to -11]), dabigatran (IRR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.41-0.59]; RD, -61.1 [95% CI, -74.8 to -47.4]), rivaroxaban (IRR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.68-0.84]; RD, -35.5 [95% CI, -48.6 to -22.4]), and warfarin (IRR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.62-0.69]; RD, -39.3 [95% CI, -44.5 to -34.2]).. Among patients initiating oral anticoagulant treatment, incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding was the highest in patients prescribed rivaroxaban, and the lowest for patients prescribed apixaban. For each anticoagulant, the incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding was lower among patients who were receiving PPI cotherapy. These findings may inform assessment of risks and benefits when choosing anticoagulant agents.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Upper Gastrointestinal Tract; Warfarin

We aimed to examine the comparative effectiveness and safety between dabigatran and rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation patients.. We conducted a population-based, retrospective, new-user cohort study based on the National Health Insurance claims database in Taiwan. Adult atrial fibrillation patients who initiated dabigatran (N=10 625) or rivaroxaban (N=4609) between June 1, 2012 and May 31, 2014 were identified as the overall population. A propensity score was derived using logistic regression to model the probability of receipt of rivaroxaban as a function of potential confounders. Altogether, 4600 dabigatran users were matched with 4600 rivaroxaban users to create a propensity score-matched population. The marginal proportional hazards model was applied among the propensity score-matched population as the primary analysis, and the proportional hazards model with adjustment of the quintiles of the propensity score among the overall population was used as the secondary analysis. Rivaroxaban users had a higher risk of all-cause death than dabigatran users (hazard ratio 1.44, 95%CI 1.17-1.78 in the primary analysis and hazard ratio 1.47, 95%CI 1.23-1.75 in the secondary analysis). Rivaroxaban users also possessed a higher risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage needing transfusion than dabigatran users in the primary analysis (hazard ratio 1.41, 95%CI 1.02-1.95), but the difference diminished in the secondary analysis (hazard ratio 1.20, 95%CI 0.92-1.56). The risks of ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, arterial embolism/thrombosis, and intracranial hemorrhage were similar between the 2 groups.. Rivaroxaban therapy was associated with a statistically significant increase in all-cause death compared with dabigatran therapy in atrial fibrillation patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Transfusion; Cause of Death; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Dabigatran; Embolism; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Logistic Models; Male; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

The source of GI bleeding may elude us despite exhaustive testing in some cases. Bleeding in these cases is often related to a vascular lesion that is discernible only when actively bleeding. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of endoscopy combined with the administration of antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant agents to stimulate bleeding in order to define a source.. A retrospective review of a database of device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) procedures was completed to identify cases in which provocation with antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents was used as part of a GI bleeding evaluation. Procedures were divided into 3 groups based on the method of provocation: patients with a history of bleeding associated with an antiplatelet/anticoagulant (provocation-experienced); patients naïve to these medications (provocation-naïve); and cases of recurrent, overt GI bleeding in which a combination of clopidogrel and intravenous heparin was administered for provocation (Lousiana State University [LSU] protocol).. A review of 824 DAE procedures was completed to identify a total of 38 instances in which provocation was attempted in 27 patients. These cases were subdivided into 13 provocation-experienced procedures, 18 provocation-naïve procedures, and 7 LSU protocol procedures. The diagnostic yield of provocative testing per procedure was 53% in the provocation-experienced group, 27% in the provocation-naïve group, and 71% in the full protocol group. Provocative testing was revealing in 15 of 27 patients; angioectasias and Dieulafoy lesions were the most common pathologies. Provocative testing was not beneficial in 4 patients who were eventually diagnosed with bleeding caused by intestinal angioectasias (3) and an aorto-enteric fistula (1). There were no adverse events.. Provocative testing combined with endoscopy can be justified as an option in the diagnostic algorithm of complex cases of GI bleeding when intermittent bleeding related to a vascular lesion, such as an angioectasia or Dieulafoy, is suspected. However, this novel technique should be considered only after standard management has failed to define a bleeding source, and bleeding continues to recur. This is the first reported case series of provocative testing combined with endoscopy.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Balloon Enteroscopy; Clopidogrel; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Ticlopidine; Vascular Malformations

Effectiveness data on novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) by prior warfarin use are limited.. We used data from the US MarketScan databases from 2009 to 2012. NVAF patients initiating dabigatran or rivaroxaban were matched with up to 5 warfarin users. Propensity score-adjusted Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for relevant endpoints in NOACs versus warfarin users. Separate analyses were conducted to compare anticoagulant-naïve users of NOACs and those switching from warfarin.. Among 32,918 dabigatran, 3301 rivaroxaban, and 109,447 warfarin users with NVAF, 225 intracranial bleeds, 1035 ischemic strokes, 958 myocardial infarctions, and 1842 gastrointestinal bleeds were identified. Compared to warfarin users, patients initiating NOACs had similar ischemic stroke rates and lower intracranial bleeding rates, while the gastrointestinal bleeding rate was higher in dabigatran users than warfarin users. Associations of dabigatran with ischemic stroke risk differed between anticoagulant-naïve initiators and patients switching from warfarin; dabigatran was associated with lower ischemic stroke rates in naïve users (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.52-0.82) but not in switchers (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.95-1.51), compared to warfarin. Risk of stroke and bleeding was not different between rivaroxaban and warfarin users.. Real-world effectiveness of NOACs (compared to warfarin) for diverse outcomes was comparable to efficacy reported in published clinical trials. However, harms and benefits of switching from warfarin to dabigatran need to be evaluated.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is a member of the novel target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) family of drugs recently approved for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism events. A major drawback of the drug is its potential for causing severe hemorrhagic events, which may be difficult to treat in an emergency setting due to lack of effective antidote. Here, we describe a case of acute gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage leading to complete colon obstruction in a patient treated with rivaroxaban. Summary and Key Messages: The case presented here demonstrates a chain of events originating from an unprovoked intramural bleeding in a patient using rivaroxaban, leading to an organized giant clot formation, and to complete colon obstruction. In the available literature, the specific site of the GI bleeding has not been discussed. A further study is recommended and re-examination of bleeding events and exploration of new cases due to the use of TSOACs can help predict the course and the outcomes of such complications.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Colon; Diagnosis, Differential; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction; Male; Rivaroxaban

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) agents increase the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. We investigated which DOAC had the most favorable GI safety profile and compared differences among these drugs in age-related risk of GI bleeding.. We conducted a retrospective, propensity-matched study using administrative claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse of privately insured individuals and Medicare Advantage enrollees. We created 3 propensity-matched cohorts of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation with incident exposure to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban from October 1, 2010 through February 28, 2015. We compared data on rivaroxaban vs dabigatran for 31,574 patients, data on apixaban vs dabigatran for 13,084 patients, and data on apixaban vs rivaroxaban for 13,130 patients. Cox proportional hazards models, stratified by age, were used to estimate rates of total GI bleeding.. Baseline characteristics were well balanced among sub-cohorts. GI bleeding occurred more frequently in patients given rivaroxaban than dabigatran (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.45). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of GI bleeding than dabigatran (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27-0.58; P < .001) or rivaroxaban (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.22-0.49; P < .001). Rates of events for all DOACs increased among patients 75 years or older. Apixaban had a lower risk of association with GI bleeding in the very elderly than dabigatran (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29-0.71) or rivaroxaban (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.61). Median times to GI bleeding were <90 days for apixaban and rivaroxaban and <120 days for dabigatran.. In a population-based study of patients receiving DOAC agents, we found apixaban had the most favorable GI safety profile and rivaroxaban the least favorable profile. GI bleeding events among patient aged 75 years or older taking DOACs increased with age; the risk was greatest among persons 75 years. Apixaban had the most favorable GI safety profile among all age groups.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Young Adult

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown noninferiority to warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and a more promising safety profile. Unanswered safety aspects remain to be addressed and available evidence on the risk associated with these drugs are conflicting. In order to contribute to the debate on their safety profile, we conducted a comparative analysis of the reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with DOACs in VigiBase.. Study based on reports of suspected ADRs held in VigiBase as at December 2014, in which a DOAC or warfarin were administered in patients with nonvalvular AF and listed as suspected/interacting drugs. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities was used to classify ADRs. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval were calculated. Results with P ≤ 0.05 were statistically significant.. We retrieved 32 972 reports. We identified 204 ADRs with a ROR >1 (P ≤ 0.05) and we focused on 105 reactions. Positive ROR emerged for DOACs and gastrointestinal haemorrhage compared with warfarin [(1.6 (1.47-1.75)], but no disproportionality with cerebral haemorrhage was found [0.31 (0.28-0.34)]. We identified other potential signals that have not been associated with DOACs previously.. As well as premarketing authorization clinical trial studies, we found a reduced risk of intracranial haemorrhage, but an increased risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage in patients treated with DOACs compared to warfarin. We provide new data and we highlight several differences between the three novel oral anticoagulants, in the rate and type of ADRs occurred.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Child; Child, Preschool; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin; World Health Organization; Young Adult

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common co-morbidity in those with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Most patients with DM and NVAF have a CHA

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Data Collection; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Patient Selection; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Early reports suggested that the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) was higher for patients on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) than for those on warfarin. We compared the incidence of GIB in our patients on NOACs with those on warfarin.. We used our VA pharmacy database to identify patients taking NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) or warfarin between January 2011 and June 2015, and used the VistA system to identify those who were hospitalized for GIB. We included only patients with clinically significant GIB, defined as documented GI blood loss with a hemoglobin drop ≥2 g/dl, hemodynamic instability, and/or need for endoscopic evaluation, angiography, or surgery.. We identified 803 patients on NOACs and 6,263 on warfarin. One hundred and fifty-eight patients on warfarin had GIB (2.5%), compared with only five patients (0.6%) on NOACs (odds ratio=4.13; 95% confidence interval: 1.69-10.09). Blood transfusion for GIB was significantly more common in patients on warfarin than on NOACs (64.6% vs. 20%, P=0.04). Within 90 days of GIB hospitalization, 12 patients (7.6%) in the warfarin group died, whereas there were no deaths in the NOAC group.. In our patients, the incidence of GIB for those on warfarin was more than four times that for those on NOACs. Blood transfusions for GIB were more common in warfarin patients, and no NOAC patients died of GIB. In contrast to early reports, our findings suggest that the risk of GIB and subsequent complications is considerably lower for patients on NOACs than for patients on warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Transfusion; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemoglobins; Humans; Incidence; Male; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

To examine the long-term persistence and safety of the non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran (D), rivaroxaban (R) and apixaban (A) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) treated in the framework of a well structured, nurse-based AF unit for initiation and follow-up of NOAC.. Retrospective clinical data were collected for 766 consequent patients from a single cardiology outpatient clinic incorporating the AF unit.. The follow-up time, median (q1-q3), was 367 days (183-493) for D patients (n = 233), 432 days (255-546) for R patients (n = 282) and 348 days (267-419) for A patients (n = 251). No significant differences were found between the three groups with regard to age, sex, renal function, or CHA2DS2-VASc score. For all bleeding events the incidence rates per 100 patient-years of follow-up (95% confidence interval [CI], p-value) were reported more often for treatment with R (17.2, 12.7-22.8) than for D (7.0, 4.0-11.3, p = 0.001) and A (8.7, 5.2-13.6, p = 0.013). The differences remained significant after adjustment for clinically relevant variables. Discontinuation rates (n = 167) were lower for A (11.5, 7.5-16.8) than for D (30, 23.4-37.9, p < 0.001) and R (23.9, 18.6-30.1, p = 0.001), and were mainly attributed to drug-specific side effects and bleedings. The majority of discontinued patients (n = 142, 85%) proceeded with other types of oral anticoagulants.. The main limitation of the study is the small patient population with a short follow-up time.. In a retrospective study at a single AF clinic, NOACs showed significantly different bleeding rates and varied discontinuation rates when compared to each other, related mainly to agent-specific side effects and bleedings. The majority of patients that discontinued proceeded with other types of oral anticoagulant.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Topics: Computed Tomography Angiography; Embolization, Therapeutic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Melena; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Malformations; Venous Thrombosis

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin cause similar bleeding rates.. We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study to determine the incidence of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) beginning dabigatran, rivaroxaban or warfarin. Consecutive patients initiating anticoagulation for AF during a 3year period were identified using a computerized database. Patients who bled and required hospitalization underwent chart review. Bleeding incidences were calculated per 100 patient-years of treatment.. 18,249 patients were included: 9564 (52.4%) received warfarin, 5976 (32.7%) dabigatran, and 2709 (14.8%) rivaroxaban. Bleeding incidences were 3.9 (95% CI, 3.6-4.4) in warfarin-treated patients, 4.2 (95% CI, 3.7-4.7) in dabigatran patients, and 4.1 (95% CI, 3.0-5.3) in rivaroxaban patients. Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) rates were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.56-0.90) for warfarin, 0.4 (95% CI, 0.18-0.87) for dabigatran, and 0.27 (95%CI, 0.10-0.80) for rivaroxaban. GI hemorrhage rates were 1.88 (95%CI, 1.62-2.20) for warfarin, 2.98 (95% CI, 2.4-3.5) for dabigatran and 2.39 (95%CI, 1.6-3.5) for rivaroxaban.. We demonstrate similar bleeding rates with both dabigatran 150mg and 110mg and rivaroxaban compared to warfarin.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Databases, Factual; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Israel; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Previous trials investigating usage of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) excluded patients with various thrombotic risk factors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 4F-PCC in a real-world setting based on an institutional protocol that does not have strict exclusion criteria.. This was a retrospective study of adult patients who received 4F-PCC. The primary outcome was a confirmed thromboembolism within 14 days after 4F-PCC administration. Secondary outcomes included international normalized ratio (INR) correction to <1.5 at first draw and incidence of INR rebound for patients undergoing reversal of warfarin and hemostatic effectiveness for patients experiencing a bleed.. Ninety-three patients received 4F-PCC. Sixty-three (67.7%) were reversed for bleeding and 30 (32.3%) for surgery. Eleven patients (11.8%) developed a thromboembolism within 14 days. The median (interquartile range) time to event was 5 (2-7) days. Significant risk factors were heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (P= .01) and major surgery within 14 days (P= .02), as well as the presence of >6 thrombotic risk factors (P= .01). For patients post-warfarin reversal, 45/63 (71.4%) achieved INR correction at first draw, 55/63 (87.3%) achieved INR correction within 24 hours, and 14/55 (25.5%) experienced INR rebound. Of these 14 patients, 8 (57.1%) did not receive concomitant vitamin K.. 4F-PCC was associated with a notable thromboembolic risk. All patient-specific risk factors should be considered prior to administration. 4F-PCC remains a useful agent for warfarin reversal. Lack of concomitant vitamin K may contribute to INR rebound.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Blood Coagulation Factors; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Dabigatran; Emergencies; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Heart Transplantation; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Heparin; Humans; Incidence; International Normalized Ratio; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Laparotomy; Male; Middle Aged; Preoperative Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thrombocytopenia; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Although several non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants have been developed to prevent cardiogenic thrombosis, the status of hemorrhagic complications in the clinical setting among Asian populations, including Japan, remains unclear. We conducted this retrospective cohort study to clarify the current status of hemorrhagic events during antithrombotic therapy with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants, with particular focus on gastrointestinal bleeding.. Medical charts of 475 patients prescribed dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban between April 2011 and September 2014 were reviewed to examine whether any hemorrhagic events occurred, compared with 135 patients who received warfarin between April 2009 and March 2011.. Incidences of total and actionable hemorrhage in patient taking non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants were 13.8% per year and 4.6% per year, respectively, showing no significant differences from those in warfarin users (9.3% per year and 5.0% per year, respectively). In addition, actionable gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred at similar rates in non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants users (2.1% per year) and warfarin users (1.5% per year). Most hemorrhages were from the lower gastrointestinal tract, and considerable events involved perianal bleeding. Multiple regression analysis showed that age, concomitant dual antiplatelet therapy, and concomitant nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy were significant factors related to actionable gastrointestinal bleeding.. Risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients taking non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants was similar to that in patients taking warfarin. The dominant bleeding site was the lower gastrointestinal tract.
.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K; Warfarin

It is unclear whether the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant agents rivaroxaban and dabigatran are superior to warfarin for efficacy and safety outcomes in Asians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).. The aim of this study was to compare the risk for thromboembolic events, bleeding, and mortality associated with rivaroxaban and dabigatran versus warfarin in Asians with NVAF.. A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted of consecutive patients with NVAF taking rivaroxaban (n = 3,916), dabigatran (n = 5,921), or warfarin (n = 5,251) using data collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between February 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. The propensity score weighting method was used to balance covariates across study groups. Patients were followed until the first occurrence of any study outcome or the study end date (December 31, 2013).. A total of 3,425 (87%) and 5,301 (90%) patients were taking low-dose rivaroxaban (10 to 15 mg once daily) and dabigatran (110 mg twice daily), respectively. Compared with warfarin, both rivaroxaban and dabigatran significantly decreased the risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.0006, respectively), intracranial hemorrhage (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0005, respectively), and all-cause mortality (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) during the short follow-up period. In comparing the 2 non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant agents with each other, no differences were found regarding risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, intracranial hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, or mortality. Rivaroxaban carried a significantly higher risk for hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding than dabigatran (p = 0.0416), but on-treatment analysis showed that the risk for hospitalized gastrointestinal bleeding was similar between the 2 drugs (p = 0.5783).. In real-world practice among Asians with NVAF, both rivaroxaban and dabigatran were associated with reduced risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality without significantly increased risk for acute myocardial infarction or hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding compared with warfarin.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Asian People; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants approved for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). There are no randomized head-to-head comparisons of these drugs for stroke, bleeding, or mortality outcomes.. To compare risks of thromboembolic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), major extracranial bleeding including major gastrointestinal bleeding, and mortality in patients with nonvalvular AF who initiated dabigatran or rivaroxaban treatment for stroke prevention.. Retrospective new-user cohort study of 118 891 patients with nonvalvular AF who were 65 years or older, enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare, and who initiated treatment with dabigatran or rivaroxaban from November 4, 2011, through June 30, 2014. Differences in baseline characteristics were adjusted using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights based on propensity scores. The data analysis was performed from May 7, 2015, through June 30, 2016.. Dabigatran, 150 mg, twice daily; rivaroxaban, 20 mg, once daily.. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the primary outcomes of thromboembolic stroke, ICH, major extracranial bleeding including major gastrointestinal bleeding, and mortality, with dabigatran as reference. Adjusted incidence rate differences (AIRDs) were also estimated.. A total of 52 240 dabigatran-treated and 66 651 rivaroxaban-treated patients (47% female) contributed 15 524 and 20 199 person-years of on-treatment follow-up, respectively, during which 2537 primary outcome events occurred. Rivaroxaban use was associated with a statistically nonsignificant reduction in thromboembolic stroke (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65-1.01; P = .07; AIRD = 1.8 fewer cases/1000 person-years), statistically significant increases in ICH (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.20-2.26; P = .002; AIRD = 2.3 excess cases/1000 person-years) and major extracranial bleeding (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.32-1.67; P < .001; AIRD = 13.0 excess cases/1000 person-years), including major gastrointestinal bleeding (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.23-1.59; P < .001; AIRD = 9.4 excess cases/1000 person-years), and with a statistically nonsignificant increase in mortality (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.32; P = .051; AIRD = 3.1 excess cases/1000 person-years). In patients 75 years or older or with CHADS2 score greater than 2, rivaroxaban use was associated with significantly increased mortality compared with dabigatran use. The excess rate of ICH with rivaroxaban use exceeded its reduced rate of thromboembolic stroke.. Treatment with rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily was associated with statistically significant increases in ICH and major extracranial bleeding, including major gastrointestinal bleeding, compared with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Heart Valve Diseases; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Medicare; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States

Gastrointestinal bleeding during treatment with non -vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may be caused by malignant lesions Gastrointestinal bleeding due to underlying malignancy may not be uncommon in real life patients on non vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) like dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban. We performed a small pilot study in patients referred to endoscopy due to suspected gastrointestinal bleeding. In twenty NOAC-treated patients, we found four cases of manifest malignant colon tumors, one premalignant colon adenoma, and one gastric B-cell lymphoma. All lesions were previously unknown and non-symptomatic apart from suspected gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy should be performed in patients on NOACs with signs or suspicions of gastrointestinal bleeding. Whether a fecal occult blood test should be incorporated in the follow-up of patients on NOAC treatment deserves to be investigated in future studies.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Colonoscopy; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Pilot Projects; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K

Anticoagulants carry a significant risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). Data regarding the safety of anticoagulation continuation/cessation after GIB are limited. We sought to determine the safety and risk of continuation of anticoagulation after GIB.. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study on consecutive patients admitted to the hospital who had GIB while on systemic anticoagulation. Patients were classified into two groups at hospital discharge after GIB: those who resumed anticoagulation and those who had anticoagulation discontinued. Patients in both groups were contacted by phone 90 days after discharge to determine the following outcomes: (i) thromboembolic events, (ii) hospital readmissions related to GIB, and (iii) mortality. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards were used to determine factors associated with thrombotic events, rebleeding, and death.. We identified 197 patients who developed GIB while on systemic anticoagulation (n=145, 74% on warfarin). Following index GIB, anticoagulation was discontinued in 76 patients (39%) at discharge. In-hospital transfusion requirements, need for intensive care unit care, and etiology of GIB were similar between the two groups. During the follow-up period, 7 (4%) patients suffered a thrombotic event and 27 (14%) patients were readmitted for GIB. Anticoagulation continuation was independently associated on multivariate regression with a lower risk of major thrombotic episodes within 90 days (hazard ratio (HR)=0.121, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.006-0.812, P=0.03). Patients with any malignancy at time of GIB had an increased risk of thromboembolism in follow-up (HR=6.1, 95% CI=1.18-28.3, P=0.03). Anticoagulation continuation at discharge was not significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrent GIB at 90 days (HR=2.17, 95% CI=0.861-6.67, P=0.10) or death within 90 days (HR=0.632, 95% CI=0.216-1.89, P=0.40).. Restarting anticoagulation at discharge after GIB was associated with fewer thromboembolic events without a significantly increased risk of recurrent GIB at 90 days. The benefits of continuing anticoagulation at discharge may outweigh the risks of recurrent GIB.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Enoxaparin; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Heparin; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Patient Readmission; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin; Withholding Treatment

To determine the real world risk of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with the use of the novel oral anticoagulants dabigatran and rivaroxaban compared with warfarin.. Retrospective, propensity matched cohort study.. Optum Labs Data Warehouse, a large database including administrative claims data on privately insured and Medicare Advantage enrollees.. New users of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin from 1 November 2010 to 30 September 2013.. Incidence rates (events/100 patient years) and propensity score matched Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate rates of total gastrointestinal bleeds, upper gastrointestinal bleeds, and lower gastrointestinal bleeds for the novel oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in patients with and without atrial fibrillation. Heterogeneity of treatment effect related to age was examined using a marginal effects model.. The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with dabigatran was 2.29 (95% confidence interval 1.88 to 2.79) per 100 patient years and that associated with warfarin was 2.87 (2.41 to 3.41) per 100 patient years in patients with atrial fibrillation. In non-atrial fibrillation patients, the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding was 4.10 (2.47 to 6.80) per 100 patient years with dabigatran and 3.71 (2.16 to 6.40) per 100 patient years with warfarin. With rivaroxaban, 2.84 (2.30 to 3.52) gastrointestinal bleeding events per 100 patient years occurred in atrial fibrillation patients (warfarin 3.06 (2.49 to 3.77)/100 patient years) and 1.66 (1.23 to 2.24) per 100 patient years in non-atrial fibrillation patients (warfarin 1.57 (1.25 to 1.99)/100 patient years). In propensity score matched models, the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants was similar to that with warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients (dabigatran v warfarin, hazard ratio 0.79 (0.61 to 1.03); rivaroxaban v warfarin, 0.93 (0.69 to 1.25)) and in non-AF patients (dabigatran v warfarin, hazard ratio 1.14 (0.54 to 2.39); rivaroxaban v warfarin, 0.89 (0.60 to 1.32)). The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding increased after age 65, such that by age 76 the risk exceeded that with warfarin among atrial fibrillation patients taking dabigatran (hazard ratio 2.49 (1.61 to 3.83)) and patients with and without atrial fibrillation taking rivaroxaban (2.91 (1.65 to 4.81) and 4.58 (2.40 to 8.72), respectively).. The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding related to novel oral anticoagulants was similar to that for warfarin. Caution should be used when prescribing novel oral anticoagulants to older people, particularly those over 75 years of age.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Medicaid; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Patient Selection; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; United States; Warfarin

To determine the real world safety of dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in terms of gastrointestinal bleeding.. Retrospective cohort study.. Large administrative database of commercially insured people in United States from 1 October 2010 through 31 March 2012.. Enrollees with a prescription of warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban between 1 October 2010 and 31 March 2012, who were aged 18 years or older, had continuous enrollment and no oral anticoagulant use during the six months before the entry date, with known age and sex, and with no gastrointestinal bleeding for at least six months before the cohort entry date. The final study sample of 46,163 patients included 4907 using dabigatran, 1649 using rivaroxaban, and 39,607 using warfarin.. Time to gastrointestinal bleeding. Hazard ratios were derived from Cox proportional hazard models with propensity score weighting and robust estimates of errors.. Dabigatran users tended to be older (dabigatran v rivaroxaban v warfarin: 62.0 v 57.6 v 57.4 years) and more likely to be male (69% v 49% v 53%). The rate of gastrointestinal bleeding was highest among dabigatran users and lowest among rivaroxaban users (dabigatran v rivaroxaban v warfarin: 9.01 v 3.41 v 7.02 cases per 100 person years). After adjustment for potentially confounding covariates, there was no evidence of a statistically significant difference in the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding between dabigatran and warfarin users (adjusted hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.53) or between rivaroxaban and warfarin users (0.98, 0.36 to 2.69).. Although rates of gastrointestinal bleeding seem to be similar in this commercially insured sample of adults in the United States, we cannot rule out as much as a 50% increase in the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with dabigatran compared with warfarin or a more than twofold higher risk of bleeding with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Observational Studies as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; United States; Warfarin

Adoption of the target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) has been slow; accordingly, lack of guidance for emergent reversal confounded by the need for "direct" reversal agents has contributed significantly to warfarin entrenchment in the medical community. The purpose of this analysis is to provide real-world experiences regarding the management of the hemorrhaging patient secondary to dabigatran and rivaroxaban.. Retrospective review of patients admitted with a hemorrhage secondary to dabigatran or rivaroxaban were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were utilized for analysis.. Four hundred forty-four patients were screened for inclusion into the study; notably, 419 (94%) of the patients were excluded because the bleed was secondary to warfarin therapy. Of those included in this analysis (n = 25), gastrointestinal bleeding accounted for 21 events (84%), followed by intracranial (n = 2; 8%) and epistaxis (n = 2; 8%). Two patients (8%) expired during admission and 6 patients (24%) expired within 6 months after discharge from the hospital. Three (12%) minor bleeds, 7 (28%) major bleeds, and 15 (60%) life-threatening bleeds were identified. Minor bleeds required careful monitoring, supportive care, and cessation of anticoagulation therapy, whereas increasing severity required multiple interventions with prothrombin complex concentrate, recombinant activated factor 7, fresh frozen plasma, packed red blood cells, cryoprecipitate, and platelets.. The approach to the management of bleeding events borne from TSOACs has proven to be very heterogeneous. In the midst of this observation period, these facilities developed protocols, which created a stratification of bleeds and a more regimented approach to managing them. Although bleeding is less with new agents, the creation of pathways/algorithms for the management of TSOACs and education regarding clinical decision-making may be beneficial for the expeditious and appropriate management when these events arise.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Blood Coagulation Factors; Coagulants; Cohort Studies; Dabigatran; Epistaxis; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Factor VIIa; Factor VIII; Female; Fibrinogen; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Plasma; Platelet Transfusion; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

To determine if a modified HAS-BLED score (hypertension, abnormal renal/liver dysfunction, stroke, bleeding history, elderly, drugs) predicts risk for major bleeding in patients prescribed dabigatran or rivaroxaban.. A retrospective, case-control study.. Two inpatient medical centers.. Patients prescribed dabigatran or rivaroxaban who experienced a major bleed from June 1, 2011, to August 31, 2013.. Medication and demographic information were collected for patients who experienced a major bleeding episode. Each bleeding case was matched to four control patients based on drug, indication, month and year, and hospital.. The primary outcome was the association between a modified HAS-BLED score and major bleeding in patients receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban. The secondary objective was to determine which risk factors, whether individual components of HAS-BLED or alternative variables, were associated with major bleeding in patients receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban.. Thirty-eight major bleeds were identified, with 23 bleeds having occurred in patients receiving rivaroxaban, and 15 patients taking dabigatran. The most frequent type of bleed was gastrointestinal. Logistic regression yielded only protime (P < 0.001) and albumin (P < 0.042) as statistically significant risk factors for bleeding.. A modified HAS-BLED score was not predictive of risk of major bleeding in this cohort of primarily elderly patients taking dabigatran or rivaroxaban.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Case-Control Studies; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban

To describe the population admitted in an emergency department of a teaching hospital for severe bleeding associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC).. During a three-year period (2012-2014) patients older than 16 years were prospectively identified by haemorrhagic symptoms from computerised requests. At least one of the following criteria defined major haemorrhage: haemorrhagic shock, unstable haemodynamic, need for transfusion or haemostatic procedure, or a life threatening location.. Fifty four patients, 23 receiving dabigatran, 30 rivaroxaban and one apixaban were included, 2 in 2012, 35 in 2013 and 17 in 2014. Median age was 84 years (range 63-99) with a sex ratio of 1.16. Haemorrhagic complications were gastrointestinal (n=27), intracranial (n=12) or miscellaneous (n=15). Indication of DOAC was stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in 49 cases and deep vein thrombosis in 5 cases. Hospitalization was required for 45 patients (83%) with a mean length of stay of 8.5 days. Sixteen patients needed intensive care. Reversal therapy was prescribed in 11 patients. At 1 month, overall mortality was 24%, reaching 41.7% for intracranial haemorrhage. Among surviving patients, DOAC was stopped in 10 cases, continued in 17 patients and switched for other antithrombotic in 17 patients.. Our study contributes to the post marketing surveillance of major haemorrhagic complications associated with DOAC. It takes part to the knowledge about the course of this severe event in emergencies. Careful awareness in risk benefit assessment, especially in elderly, is needed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemodynamics; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Admission; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

The use of rivaroxaban in fixed dosing regimens without need for routine coagulation monitoring may lead to the misconception that there is a minimal risk of drug-drug interactions. We describe the case of a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) on salvage therapy who developed gastrointestinal bleeding while receiving the standard dose of rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after surgery. This case clearly sends a warning that protease inhibitors should not be co-administered with rivaroxaban. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of clinicians' caution about potential drug-drug interactions.

Topics: Ankle Fractures; Anticoagulants; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Ritonavir; Rivaroxaban; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes

The higher incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may be related to pre-existing malignancies; diagnostic measures triggered by these bleedings could lead to early detection of these malignancies.. We retrieved the preferred terms on GI bleeding and GI cancer reported as adverse events (AEs) from phase III studies in patients with atrial fibrillation for each NOAC on ClinicalTrials.gov . We also analyzed the RE-LY trial database.. From ClinicalTrials.gov , AE-GI bleeding incidence was: dabigatran 110 mg b.i.d. (D110: 1.42% versus 1.37%), dabigatran 150 mg b.i.d. (D150: 1.93% versus 1.37%), rivaroxaban (3.52% versus 2.68%), and apixaban (1.93% versus 1.59%), compared with warfarin, respectively. The incidence of AE-GI cancer was similar between the NOACs (D110 [0.79%], D150 [0.61%], rivaroxaban [0.83%], and apixaban [0.69%]), but numerically higher compared with warfarin (0.37%; 0.73%; 0.57%, respectively). In the RE-LY database, the same pattern was seen for dabigatran, with an association between GI bleeding and GI cancer diagnosis.. Anticoagulant-related GI bleeding may represent the unmasking of pre-existing malignancies leading to increased detection of GI cancer. This may be especially in the first month of treatment and could explain the numerically higher numbers of GI malignancies observed with NOACs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Early Detection of Cancer; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Humans; Incidence; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Warfarin

The risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding of dabigatran and rivaroxaban is relatively unexplored. The aim of our study was to compare this risk in both drugs.. We examined the medical records of patients on either dabigatran or rivaroxaban from October 2010 to April 2013 in two hospitals.. A total of 374 patients (147 rivaroxaban vs. 227 dabigatran) were identified. GI bleeding occurred in 5.3% in the dabigatran when compared to 4.8% in the rivaroxaban group (p = 0.8215). Multivariate analysis showed that the odds of GI bleeding while on dabigatran for ≤40 days when compared to ≥40 days was 8.3 (p < 0.0001). In the rivaroxaban group, patients who were on the drug for ≤40 days had a higher incidence of bleeding when compared to those >40 days (OR = 2.8, p = 0.023). Concomitant use of antiplatelets (single or dual) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was not associated with increased bleeding in the dabigatran group; however, the use of dual antiplatelet agents with rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of GI bleeding (OR = 7.4, p = 0.0378). Prior GI bleeding had a higher risk of bleeding in the rivaroxaban group (OR = 15.5, p = 0.0002).. Dabigatran was not associated with a higher incidence of GI bleeding. Both drugs had a higher bleeding risk in the first 40 days.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

The oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban is recommended for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis following lower limb arthroplasty. Concerns regarding high rates of wound complications following its use have prompted this multicenter comparison with low-molecular-weight heparins.. English hospital trusts that replaced a low-molecular-weight heparin with rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in lower limb arthroplasty during 2009 were identified. Prospectively collected national data for these units were analyzed to determine the thirty-day rates of wound complications and major bleeding (cerebrovascular event or gastrointestinal hemorrhage) and the ninety-day rates of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (proximal or distal), symptomatic pulmonary embolism, and all-cause inpatient mortality before and after the change to rivaroxaban. A total of 2762 patients prescribed rivaroxaban following knee or hip arthroplasty were compared with 10,361 patients prescribed a low- molecular weight heparin. Data were analyzed with use of odds ratios (ORs).. There were significantly fewer wound complications in the low-molecular-weight heparin group (2.81% compared with 3.85%; OR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58 to 0.90; p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between the low-molecular-weight heparin and rivaroxaban groups in the rates of pulmonary embolism (0.55% compared with 0.36%; OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 0.78 to 2.98), major bleeding (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.48 to 1.12), or all-cause mortality (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.89). There were significantly more symptomatic deep venous thromboses in the low-molecular-weight heparin group (0.91% compared with 0.36%; OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.31 to 4.84; p = 0.004).. The rivaroxaban group had a higher wound complication rate and a lower deep venous thrombosis rate; there were no differences in symptomatic pulmonary embolism or all-cause mortality. Longer follow-up is needed to assess any potential relationship between wound complications and joint stiffness, latent infection, and limb consequences of deep venous thrombosis.

Topics: Age Distribution; Aged; Anticoagulants; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Cohort Studies; Confidence Intervals; Databases, Factual; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Odds Ratio; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Sex Distribution; Surgical Wound Infection; Survival Analysis; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis; Wound Healing