rivaroxaban and Eye-Hemorrhage

It is unclear if the risk of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants differs compared with warfarin.. To characterize the risk of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin.. A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken in an academic medical setting. MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials published up until August 2016. This search was supplemented by manual bibliography searches of identified trials and other review articles.. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were phase 3 randomized clinical trials, enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism, compared a novel oral anticoagulant (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) with warfarin, and recorded event data on intraocular bleeding. Data on intraocular bleeding were pooled using inverse-variance, weighted, fixed-effects meta-analysis.. The PRISMA guidelines were used for abstracting data and assessing quality. Independent extraction was performed by 2 investigators.. Intraocular bleeding events and associated risk ratio for novel oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin.. Twelve trials investigating 102 627 patients were included. Randomization to novel oral anticoagulants was associated with a 22% relative reduction in intraocular bleeding compared with warfarin (risk ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99). There was no significant heterogeneity observed (I2 = 4.8%, P = .40). Comparably lower risks of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants were seen in subgroup analyses, with no significant difference according to the indication for anticoagulation (P for heterogeneity = .49) or the novel oral anticoagulant type (P for heterogeneity = .15). Summary estimates did not differ materially when random-effects meta-analytic techniques were used.. These results suggest that novel oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of intraocular bleeding by approximately one-fifth compared with warfarin. Similar benefits were seen in both patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Our data have particular relevance for patients at higher risk of spontaneous retinal and subretinal bleeding. These findings may also have important implications in the perioperative period, in which the use of novel oral anticoagulants may be superior. Future studies are required to better characterize the optimal management of patients with both ophthalmic disease and cardiovascular comorbidities requiring anticoagulation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Eye Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

To evaluate the safety of phacoemulsification of cataract in patients taking new oral anticoagulants (NOACs).. In a prospective case series, consecutive patients on NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) who were referred for uncomplicated cataract surgery to the eye institute underwent a thorough ophthalmological and hematological evaluation. Rivaroxaban and apixaban anti-factor Xa tests, and diluted thrombin time for dabigatran, were used for monitoring anticoagulation levels in blood. Blood was drawn for these tests just prior to surgery and at a peak level of the drug at about 4 h post-surgery (2 h after the drug was given). All surgeries were videotaped and patients were examined at 1 and 7 days after the operation. The main outcome measures included assessment of intra-operative, postoperative ocular bleeding, and other related complications.. Thirty-five eyes of 25 unrelated patients ranging in age from 63 to 92 years (mean 77.6 years) underwent phacoemulsification. Intra-operative bleeding was observed in 5 eyes from the conjunctiva or limbus at the main incision site. No intraocular bleeding occurred. No hemorrhagic complications were observed during the 1-week follow-up. According to anti-factor Xa levels prior to surgery and following surgery, 85% of the patients were on therapeutic levels of NOACs.. Clear corneal incision phacoemulsification performed under topical anesthesia can be safely performed in simple cases of cataract without discontinuing NOAC treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Blood Loss, Surgical; Dabigatran; Eye Hemorrhage; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Israel; Male; Middle Aged; Phacoemulsification; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism

Novel oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies have become a mainstay of treatment for thromboembolic disease. However, the safety profile of these medications has not been completely characterized.. To determine the risk of developing intraocular hemorrhages with novel oral antithrombotic therapy compared with that of traditional antithrombotic agents.. In this retrospective cohort study, a large national insurance claims database was used to generate 2 parallel analyses. All patients with incident use of dabigatran etexilate or rivaroxaban between January 1, 2010, and September 30, 2015, were compared with patients with incident use of warfarin sodium. Similarly, patients with new use of prasugrel hydrochloride were compared with those with new use of clopidogrel bisulfate. Both analyses required the patient to be in the insurance plan for at least 24 months prior to initiation of therapy and excluded patients with any previous diagnosis of intraocular hemorrhages or any prescription for the comparator medications. Furthermore, the antiplatelet analysis required a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome or a myocardial infarction within 60 days of initiation of pharmacologic therapy. The anticoagulant analysis excluded patients with end-stage renal disease, renal transplants, and those with heart valve disease.. Incident intraocular hemorrhages at 90 and 365 days. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare the hazard ratio (HR) of developing an intraocular hemorrhage in individuals taking novel agents compared with those taking traditional medications.. A total of 146 137 patients taking warfarin (76 714 women and 69 423 men; mean [SD] age, 69.8 [11.8] years) were compared with 64 291 patients taking dabigatran or rivaroxaban (31 576 women and 32 715 men; mean [SD] age, 67.6 [11.7] years). Cox proportional hazards regression revealed a decreased hazard for developing an intraocular hemorrhage with dabigatran or rivaroxaban at 365 days (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.97; P = .03), but not at 90 days (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.22-2.63; P = .13). A total of 103 796 patients taking clopidogrel (37 578 women and 66 218 men; mean [SD] age, 68.0 [11.3] years) were compared with 8386 patients taking prasugrel (1988 women and 6380 men; mean [SD] age, 61.0 [9.6] years) and no increased hazard for developing an intraocular hemorrhage with prasugrel was seen at 90 days (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.29-1.92; P = .55) or 365 days (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.69-2.04; P = .53).. These results suggest a decreased risk of intraocular hemorrhage associated with novel direct thrombin inhibitors and direct factor Xa inhibitors, but no difference for P2Y12 inhibitors compared with traditional vitamin K anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, respectively.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Eye Hemorrhage; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Male; Pennsylvania; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thromboembolism; Warfarin

PurposeTo assess the risk of intraocular hemorrhage with warfarin and new oral anticoagulants (NOACs).MethodsWe ascertained all reported cases of intraocular hemorrhage (vitreous, choroidal, or retinal) with warfarin and NOACs (including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) from the World Health Organizations's Vigibase database from 1968-2015. We used a disproportionality analysis to compute reported odds ratios (RORs) and corresponding 95% confidence by comparing the number of events with the study outcomes and study drugs compared with all other drugs reported to Vigibase. A harmful signal was deemed for a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval above 1.ResultsWe identified 80 cases of intraocular hemorrhage (vitreous, choroidal, or retinal) with warfarin in the World Health Organizations's Vigibase database from 1968-2015. A total of 156 cases of intraocular hemorrhage with NOACs (82 with rivaroxaban, 65 with dabigatran, 9 with apixaban). Warfarin had the highest signal of association with choroidal hemorrhage (ROR= 65.40 (33.86-126.30)). Rivaroxaban had the highest signal of association with both retinal and vitreous hemorrhage (ROR=7.41 (5.73-9.59) and ROR= 11.14 (7.37-16.86), respectively). Dabigatran was also significantly associated with retinal and vitreous hemorrhage (ROR= 3.78 (2.82-5.08) and ROR= 5.83 (3.66-9.30), respectively). The number of reports of retinal and vitreous hemorrhage were also significantly higher with apixaban, but the number of cases may be too little to make a meaningful evaluation.ConclusionA signal for risk of intraocular hemorrhage was detected for warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. Large epidemiologic studies are needed to further confirm these findings.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Eye Hemorrhage; Humans; Ocular Hypertension; Odds Ratio; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Blood Loss, Surgical; Cataract Extraction; Dabigatran; Eye Hemorrhage; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin