rivaroxaban and End-Stage-Liver-Disease

rivaroxaban has been researched along with End-Stage-Liver-Disease* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for rivaroxaban and End-Stage-Liver-Disease

ArticleYear
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between rivaroxaban and dabigatran in the treatment of acute portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis.
    BMC gastroenterology, 2023, Sep-25, Volume: 23, Issue:1

    New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been becoming prevalent in recent years and are increasingly used in the treatment of port vein thrombosis. The difference of the efficacy and safety between rivaroxaban and dabigatran remains unclear in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT).. This retrospective study included all consecutive cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis in our institute from January 2020 to December 2021. The patients received oral anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. The demographic, clinical, and imaging data of patients were collected. The diagnosis of acute PVT was confirmed by imaging examinations. The severity of liver cirrhosis was assessed using Child-Pugh score and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Outcomes included recanalization (complete, partial, and persistent occlusion), liver function, bleedings, and survival. The log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier distributions of time-to-event outcomes. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. A total of 94 patients were included, 52 patients (55%) received rivaroxaban and 42 (45%) with dabigatran. The complete and partial recanalization of PVT was observed in 41 patients. There was no significant difference in complete recanalization, partial recanalization, and persistent occlusion between the two groups. With multivariate analysis, D-dimer (HR 1.165, 95% CI 1.036-1.311, p = 0.011) was independent predictors of complete recanalization. The Child-Pugh score (p = 0.001) was significantly improved in both two groups after anticoagulation, respectively. However, there was no difference between the two groups. The probability of survival was 94%, 95% in the rivaroxaban and dabigatran groups (log-rank p = 0.830). Major bleedings were reported in 3 patients (6%) in rivaroxaban group and 1 patient (2%) in dabigatran group (p = 0.646). Six patients (12%) in rivaroxaban group experienced minor bleeding, and five (12%) from dabigatran group (p = 0.691).. The efficacy and safety were comparable between rivaroxaban and dabigatran in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis. And D-dimer can contribute to the prediction of PVT recanalization in cirrhotic patients.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; End Stage Liver Disease; Hemorrhage; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Portal Vein; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

2023
In Vitro Evaluation of Pro- and Anticoagulant Drugs in Children with End-Stage Liver Disease Undergoing Liver Transplantation.
    Thrombosis and haemostasis, 2020, Volume: 120, Issue:9

     Pro- and anticoagulant drugs are commonly used in pediatric liver transplantation to prevent and treat thrombotic and bleeding complications. However, the combination of baseline hemostatic changes in children with liver disease and additional changes induced by transplantation makes this very challenging. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of clinically available pro- and anticoagulant drugs in plasma from children undergoing liver transplantation..  In vitro effects of pro- and anticoagulant drugs on thrombin generation capacity were tested in plasma samples of 20 children (≤ 16 years) with end-stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation, and compared with 30 age-matched healthy controls..  Addition of pooled normal plasma had no effect in patients or controls, while 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate increased thrombin generation in both patients and controls, with enhanced activity in patients. At start of transplantation, dabigatran and unfractionated heparin had a higher anticoagulant potency in patients, whereas 30 days after transplantation low molecular weight heparin was slightly less effective in patients. Effects of rivaroxaban were comparable between patients and controls..  This study revealed important differences in efficacy of commonly used pro- and anticoagulant drugs in children with end-stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation. Therefore, dose adjustments of these drugs may be required. The results of this study may be helpful in the development of urgently needed protocols for strategies to prevent and treat bleeding and thrombotic complications in pediatric liver transplantation.

    Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Child; Child, Preschool; Dabigatran; End Stage Liver Disease; Female; Hemostatics; Heparin; Humans; Liver Transplantation; Male; Rivaroxaban

2020