rivaroxaban and Brain-Neoplasms

To present the randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence and highlight the areas of uncertainty regarding direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT).. In the last years, four RCTs have shown that rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban are at least as effective as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for the treatment of both incidental and symptomatic CAT. On the other hand, these drugs increase the risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cancer at this site. Another two RCTs have demonstrated that apixaban and rivaroxaban also prevent CAT in subjects at intermediate-to-high risk commencing chemotherapy, albeit at the price of higher likelihood of bleeding. By contrast, data are limited about the use DOAC in individuals with intracranial tumors or concomitant thrombocytopenia. It is also possible that some anticancer agents heighten the effects of DOAC via pharmacokinetic interactions, up to making their effectiveness-safety profile unfavorable. Leveraging the results of the aforementioned RCTS, current guidelines recommend DOAC as the anticoagulants of choice for CAT treatment and, in selected cases, prevention. However, the benefit of DOAC is less defined in specific patient subgroups, in which the choice of DOAC over LMWH should be carefully pondered.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Brain Neoplasms; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

BACKGROUND Venous thrombosis (VTE) is a common adverse event among inpatients, which can cause pulmonary embolism, and greatly increases mortality. The effects of rivaroxaban in patients undergoing brain glioma surgery have still not been explored. This single-center study of 94 patients undergoing surgery for cerebral glioma aimed to compare postoperative thromboprophylaxis with and without rivaroxaban. MATERIAL AND METHODS We designed a randomized, controlled, double-blind study to evaluate the effect of rivaroxaban on 94 patients undergoing brain glioma surgery. These patients were divided into a rivaroxaban group (administered at 10 mg per day from admission to discharge) and a placebo group. The primary study endpoint was incidence of VTE at discharge. The secondary endpoints included safety outcomes of major bleeding, allergy, or VTE-related death. RESULTS A total of 94 patients were enrolled in the study: 47 in the rivaroxaban group and 47 in the placebo group. Baseline characteristics of participants were well-matched in both groups. A significant reduction was found in the incidence of VTE in the rivaroxaban treatment group versus the placebo group (1/47 vs 10/47 patients, P=0.008). The rate of major bleeding events was quite low in both group (1/47 vs 1/47 patients). One patient in the placebo group died due to a pulmonary embolism and intractable concomitant underlying diseases. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that treatment with rivaroxaban is a safe and effective thromboprophylaxis treatment in patients undergoing surgery for malignant cerebral glioma.

Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Glioma; Humans; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism