rivaroxaban and Brain-Injuries--Traumatic

rivaroxaban has been researched along with Brain-Injuries--Traumatic* in 5 studies

Trials

1 trial(s) available for rivaroxaban and Brain-Injuries--Traumatic

ArticleYear
[Clinical efficacy of rivaroxaban in prevention and treatment of postoperative deep vein thrombosis for severe traumatic brain injury].
    Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 2017, Dec-05, Volume: 97, Issue:45

    Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

2017

Other Studies

4 other study(ies) available for rivaroxaban and Brain-Injuries--Traumatic

ArticleYear
Impact of Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal with Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injuries.
    Neurocritical care, 2022, Volume: 37, Issue:2

    Anticoagulant use prior to trauma has been associated with increased incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression, and mortality. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) are commonly used as off-label treatments for factor Xa inhibitor-associated life-threatening hemorrhage. At this time, there is no consensus regarding appropriate indication, target dose, or outcomes of PCC administration in patients presenting with traumatic ICH. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of reversal with PCC on hemorrhage progression and outcomes in patients with TBI on preinjury factor Xa inhibitors.. This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients ≥ 18 years presenting with an acute TBI of any severity on apixaban or rivaroxaban from September 1, 2016, to September 1, 2019. Patients were grouped on the basis of receipt of PCCs for reversal (i.e., reversal or no reversal). Exclusion criteria included spontaneous ICH or known coagulopathy. Propensity score matching was conducted with the following variables: age, Abbreviated Injury Scale (head) score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. The primary outcome was hemorrhage stability within 48 h. Secondary outcomes included degree of hemorrhage progression, in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, and incidence of thromboembolic events.. Of the 115 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 84 were included in the propensity score matched data set. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and TBI severity were similar. The majority of patients in the reversal group (35 [83.3%]) and the no reversal (NR) group (40 [95.2%]) experienced a mild TBI (admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14 to 15). In the reversal group, patients received 34.3 units/kg activated PCC, 30.5 units/kg four-factor PCC, or 54.9 units/kg four-factor PCC and activated PCC on average. There was no difference observed in the incidence of hemorrhage progression (10.8% NR vs. 15.0% reversal; p = 0.739) or in median change in ICH volume (0 mL NR vs. 1 mL reversal; p = 0.2199) between groups. Additionally, reversal did not affect in-hospital mortality (3 [7.1%] NR vs. 4 [9.5%] reversal; p > 0.999). One patient in the reversal group developed a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) during the hospitalization; however, this did not result in a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of DVT (p > 0.999).. This study demonstrated that PCC used for the treatment of factor Xa inhibitor-associated ICH related to mild TBI did not significantly impact the incidence or degree of hemorrhage progression, and PCC treatment did not result in increased thromboembolic events.

    Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

2022
The risk of delayed intracranial hemorrhage with direct acting oral anticoagulants after trauma: A two-center study.
    American journal of surgery, 2019, Volume: 217, Issue:6

    The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of a delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in trauma patients on direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).. Patients on DOACs admitted to two Level I Trauma Centers between 2014 and 2017 were reviewed. Only patients with a negative admission CT brain were included. The primary outcome was a delayed ICH.. Overall, 249 patients were included. The median age was 81 years with 82% undergoing a repeat CT. Three patients developed a delayed ICH (1.2%). One developed an ICH after receiving tissue plasminogen activator for a cerebrovascular accident after two negative CTs. Excluding this patient, the incidence dropped to 0.8%. None required neurosurgical intervention.. For patients at risk for a TBI who are on DOACs, repeat cross-sectional imaging of the brain when the initial imaging is negative is not necessary. A period of clinical observation may be warranted.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Brain; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Neuroimaging; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

2019
Diagnostic and therapeutic approach in adult patients with traumatic brain injury receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: an Austrian interdisciplinary consensus statement.
    Critical care (London, England), 2019, Feb-22, Volume: 23, Issue:1

    There is a high degree of uncertainty regarding optimum care of patients with potential or known intake of oral anticoagulants and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Anticoagulation therapy aggravates the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage but, on the other hand, patients take anticoagulants because of an underlying prothrombotic risk, and this could be increased following trauma. Treatment decisions must be taken with due consideration of both these risks. An interdisciplinary group of Austrian experts was convened to develop recommendations for best clinical practice. The aim was to provide pragmatic, clear, and easy-to-follow clinical guidance for coagulation management in adult patients with TBI and potential or known intake of platelet inhibitors, vitamin K antagonists, or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Diagnosis, coagulation testing, and reversal of anticoagulation were considered as key steps upon presentation. Post-trauma management (prophylaxis for thromboembolism and resumption of long-term anticoagulation therapy) was also explored. The lack of robust evidence on which to base treatment recommendations highlights the need for randomized controlled trials in this setting.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Austria; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Consensus; Dabigatran; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Humans; Interdisciplinary Communication; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thromboembolism; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Tranexamic Acid; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

2019
Is rivaroxaban associated with higher morbidity and mortality in patients with traumatic head injuries? A retrospective cohort study comparing rivaroxaban, no anticoagulation, and phenprocoumon.
    Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2018, Volume: 169

    The use of new anticoagulants potentially carries the risk of increased intracranial bleeding, but there is a lack of evidence. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the morbidity and mortality differs in head trauma patients depending on the type of anticoagulation.. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2009-2014. Based on sex, age, and Glasgow-Coma Scale (GCS), patients that received rivaroxaban were matched to two control groups, one that received no anticoagulant and another one that received phenprocoumon. The primary outcome was mortality. Among others, secondary outcome variables were the length of stay (LOS) at the hospital and presence of an intracranial injury.. Sixty-nine patients (23 patients per group) were analyzed. The characteristics of patients did not differ significantly across groups. There were no significant differences between groups for the primary and secondary outcomes. Two patients died in the rivaroxaban group (one of them likely due to head trauma), while one patient died in the phenprocoumon group (likely not due to head trauma), and no patient died in the no anticoagulatoin group (p = 0.36). The LOS at the hospital was similar (5.0, 4.0, and 5.0 days; p = 0.94). An intracranial injury was observed in a similar number of patients in all groups (n = 11, n = 10, and n = 8; p = 0.75).. Although limited in size, this study did not observe significant outcome differences in patients with traumatic head injuries, who received rivaroxaban, no anticoagulant or phenprocoumon. Although not significant, the only death likely due to head trauma in the study occurred in the rivaroxaban group. Larger studies are needed before clinical application of these findings.

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Morbidity; Mortality; Phenprocoumon; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban

2018