rivaroxaban and Acute-Disease

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is characterized by occlusion of blood flow in a pulmonary artery, typically due to a thrombus that travels from a vein in a lower limb. The incidence of PE is approximately 60 to 120 per 100 000 people per year. Approximately 60 000 to 100 000 patients die from PE each year in the US.. PE should be considered in patients presenting with acute chest pain, shortness of breath, or syncope. The diagnosis is determined by chest imaging. In patients with a systolic blood pressure of at least 90 mm Hg, the following 3 steps can be used to evaluate a patient with possible PE: assessment of the clinical probability of PE, D-dimer testing if indicated, and chest imaging if indicated. The clinical probability of PE can be assessed using a structured score or using clinical gestalt. In patients with a probability of PE that is less than 15%, the presence of 8 clinical characteristics (age <50 years, heart rate <100/min, an oxygen saturation level of > 94%, no recent surgery or trauma, no prior venous thromboembolism event, no hemoptysis, no unilateral leg swelling, and no estrogen use) identifies patients at very low risk of PE in whom no further testing is needed. In patients with low or intermediate clinical probability, a D-dimer level of less than 500 ng/mL is associated with a posttest probability of PE less than 1.85%. In these patients, PE can be excluded without chest imaging. A further refinement of D-dimer threshold is possible in patients aged 50 years and older, and in patients with a low likelihood of PE. Patients with a high probability of PE (ie, >40% probability) should undergo chest imaging, and D-dimer testing is not necessary. In patients with PE and a systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher, compared with heparin combined with a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin followed by warfarin alone, direct oral anticoagulants such as apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran, are noninferior for treating PE and have a 0.6% lower rate of bleeding. In patients with PE and systolic blood pressure lower than 90 mm Hg, systemic thrombolysis is recommended and is associated with an 1.6% absolute reduction of mortality (from 3.9% to 2.3%).. In the US, PE affects approximately 370 000 patients per year and may cause approximately 60 000 to 100 000 deaths per year. First-line therapy consists of direct oral anticoagulants such as apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran, with thrombolysis reserved for patients with systolic blood pressure lower than 90 mm Hg.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Heparin; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk; Rivaroxaban; United States; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Cytomegalovirus is a viral genus of the overarching family Herpesviridae, and is of particular importance because of its relevance to human disease. This association is predominantly due to human cytomegalovirus, a well-studied pathogen. In addition to the mononucleosis syndrome that can occur during acute cytomegalovirus viraemia, this virion has been recurrently implicated as a provoking factor for thromboembolic disease in the published scientific literature. As physicians increasingly forgo extensive laboratory investigation in the setting of clinical hypercoagulability, it has also become evident that in some circumstances whether or not a particular investigation alters clinical management is not necessarily the only important question. Viraemia as a provoking factor for thrombosis stands as such an example. The aim of this Grand Round is to further explore the role of cytomegalovirus as it pertains to thromboembolic disease, especially in the present era of viral-associated thromboembolism.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Acute Disease; Adult; Anticoagulants; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fever; Heparin; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Humans; Lymphocytosis; Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion; Mesenteric Veins; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thrombosis; Viremia

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common life-threatening cardiovascular condition, with an incidence of 23 to 69 new cases per 100,000 people each year. For selected low-risk patients with acute PE, outpatient treatment might provide several advantages over traditional inpatient treatment, such as reduction of hospitalisations, substantial cost savings, and improvements in health-related quality of life. This is an update of the review first published in 2014.. To compare the efficacy and safety of outpatient versus inpatient treatment in low-risk patients with acute PE for the outcomes of all-cause and PE-related mortality; bleeding; adverse events such as haemodynamic instability; recurrence of PE; and patients' satisfaction.. The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and AMED databases, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers, to 26 March 2018. We also undertook reference checking to identify additional studies.. We included randomised controlled trials of outpatient versus inpatient treatment of adults (aged 18 years and over) diagnosed with low-risk acute PE.. Two review authors selected relevant trials, assessed methodological quality, and extracted and analysed data. We calculated effect estimates using risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), or mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. We used standardised mean differences (SMDs) to combine trials that measured the same outcome but used different methods. We assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE criteria.. One new study was identified for this 2018 update, bringing the total number of included studies to two and the total number of participants to 451. Both trials discharged patients randomised to the outpatient group within 36 hours of initial triage and both followed participants for 90 days. One study compared the same treatment regimens in both outpatient and inpatient groups, and the other study used different treatment regimes. There was no clear difference in treatment effect for the outcomes of short-term mortality (30 days) (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.98, P = 0.49; low-quality evidence), long-term mortality (90 days) (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.58, P = 0.99, low-quality evidence), major bleeding at 14 days (RR 4.91, 95% CI 0.24 to 101.57, P = 0.30; low-quality evidence) and at 90 days (RR 6.88, 95% CI 0.36 to 132.14, P = 0.20; low-quality evidence), minor bleeding (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.07 to 16.79; P = 0.96, low-quality evidence), recurrent PE within 90 days (RR 2.95, 95% CI 0.12 to 71.85, P = 0.51, low-quality evidence), and participant satisfaction (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.04, P = 0.39; moderate-quality evidence). We downgraded the quality of the evidence because the CIs were wide and included treatment effects in both directions, the sample sizes and numbers of events were small, and because the effect of missing data and the absence of publication bias could not be verified. PE-related mortality, and adverse effects such as haemodynamic instability and compliance, were not assessed by the included studies.. Currently, only low-quality evidence is available from two published randomised controlled trials on outpatient versus inpatient treatment in low-risk patients with acute PE. The studies did not provide evidence of any clear difference between the interventions in overall mortality, bleeding and recurrence of PE.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Ambulatory Care; Anticoagulants; Confidence Intervals; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban

The optimal anti-thrombotic therapy for secondary prevention after an acute coronary syndrome is still a matter of debate. While current guidelines recommend dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor over 12 months especially in patients with stent implantation, the value of prolonged anticoagulation is still controversial. In the ATLAS-TIMI 52 trial, a low-dose direct factor Xa inhibition with rivaroxaban compared with placebo reduced the combined primary endpoint of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infraction and stroke with an increase in major bleeding complications. This article discusses the value and problems of adding low-dose rivaroxaban to anti-platelet therapy as secondary prevention measure after an acute myocardial infarction. It will describe the pros and cons of intensified anti-platelet therapy versus dual pathway inhibition and give recommendations for different patient groups in clinical practice.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Rivaroxaban

Cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at increased risk for both bleeding and VTE recurrence. Anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the standard of care during the initial and long-term treatment phase (i.e. during the first 3 - 6 months of therapy) based on its overall beneficial safety and efficacy profile compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran are approved for the treatment of acute VTE, and the combined six phase-3 trials have included > 1500 patients with active cancer, as defined by variable selection criteria. Subgroup analyses of these patients, either pooled or separately reported, suggest that DOACs could be a safe and efficacious alternative to VKA therapy for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. However, the populations of cancer patients included in the DOAC and LMWH trials are not comparable with regard to mortality and VTE risk, and no specific data from direct head-to-head comparisons of DOACs with LMWHs are currently available. The use of DOACs for the management of VTE in cancer is thus not recommended by clinical practice guidelines.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Guideline Adherence; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Long-Term Care; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are attractive options for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We report our continuing experience in Hamilton, ON, Canada, since January 1, 2015 (when we completed our prospective study of rivaroxaban for HIT), using rivaroxaban for serologically confirmed HIT (4Ts score ≥4 points; positive platelet factor 4 [PF4]/heparin immunoassay, positive serotonin-release assay). We also performed a literature review of HIT treatment using DOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban). We focused on patients who received DOAC therapy for acute HIT as either primary therapy (group A) or secondary therapy (group B; initial treatment using a non-DOAC/non-heparin anticoagulant with transition to a DOAC during HIT-associated thrombocytopenia). Our primary end point was occurrence of objectively documented thrombosis during DOAC therapy for acute HIT. We found that recovery without new, progressive, or recurrent thrombosis occurred in all 10 Hamilton patients with acute HIT treated with rivaroxaban. Data from the literature review plus these new data identified a thrombosis rate of 1 of 46 patients (2.2%; 95% CI, 0.4%-11.3%) in patients treated with rivaroxaban during acute HIT (group A, n = 25; group B, n = 21); major hemorrhage was seen in 0 of 46 patients. Similar outcomes in smaller numbers of patients were observed with apixaban (n = 12) and dabigatran (n = 11). DOACs offer simplified management of selected patients, as illustrated by a case of persisting (autoimmune) HIT (>2-month platelet recovery with inversely parallel waning of serum-induced heparin-independent serotonin release) with successful outpatient rivaroxaban management of HIT-associated thrombosis. Evidence supporting efficacy and safety of DOACs for acute HIT is increasing, with the most experience reported for rivaroxaban.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Female; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ontario; Polysaccharides; Rivaroxaban; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Outcome

Emergency physicians make treatment decisions in patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). They also encounter patients on target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) who require urgent intervention. New approvals and increasing prescriptions for TSOACs (e.g., apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) for the management of several thromboembolic disorders warrant an evaluation of the impact of these agents in the ED setting.. This review discusses the use of TSOACs in the ED for the treatment of acute VTE, and highlights strategies for the management of patients on TSOACs who present to the ED with other complications, such as bleeding complications or requiring emergency surgery.. Apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban have been approved for the treatment of acute VTE. We discuss the impact of this on ED management of TSOAC-naïve patients and highlight results with TSOACs in high-risk subgroups including the elderly and those with prior VTE or active cancer. This review also discusses management strategies for patients on TSOACs. For emergency physicians, strategies for the management of bleeding, approaches to patient care when emergency surgery is needed, laboratory assays for measuring plasma concentrations of TSOACs, and drug-drug interactions are of special importance.. Familiarity with TSOACs will better position emergency physicians to provide state-of-the art care to their patients with VTE and help them manage potentially complicated circumstances related to the chronic use of these drugs.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Emergency Service, Hospital; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism

Only vitamin K antagonists could be applied as oral anticoagulants over the past six decades. Coumarols have narrow therapeutic range, and unpredictable anticoagulant effects are resulted by multiple drug interactions. Therefore, regular routine monitoring of the international normalized ratio is necessary. There are two groups of factor-specific anticoagulants: molecules with anti-FIIa (dabigatran) and anti-FXa (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) effect. Author summarizes the most important clinical features of the new oral anticoagulants, their indications and the possibilities of laboratory controls. Bleedings are the most important side effects of anticoagulants. This review summarizes the current published evidences for new oral anticoagulants reversal (non-specific and specific) agents, especially in cases with severe acute bleedings or urgent surgery procedures. It reports on how to use inhibitors, the recommended doses and the most important clinical results. The review focuses on idarucizumab - already approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency - which has a key role as the first specific inhibitor of dabigatran.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Ambulatory Care; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Antithrombins; Dabigatran; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thiazoles

Four target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOA's) have been compared to a vitamin K antagonist for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE): dabigatran (D), rivaroxaban (R), apixaban (A) and edoxaban (E). We performed an indirect comparison of the TSOA's, based on the six phase III trials identified (RE-COVER I, RE-COVER II, EINSTEIN-DVT, EINSTEIN-PE, AMPLIFY and Hokusai-VTE). There was no statistically significant difference in risk of recurrent VTE or all-cause mortality between the TSOA's. For major bleeding, the RR of an event was 0.42 (95% CI 0.21-0.87, p = 0.02) for A versus D, compared with 0.57 (95% CI 0.29-1.15, p = 0.12) for A versus R, 0.37 (95% CI 0.19-0.73, p < 0.001) for A versus E, 0.74 (95% CI 0.42-1.30, p = 0.30) for R versus D, 0.64 (95% CI 0.38-1.08, p = 0.10) for R versus E and 1.15 (95% CI 0.66-2.00, p = 0.62) for E versus D. For the composite endpoint of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, the RR was 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.96, p = 0.02) for A versus D, 0.47 (95% CI 0.37-0.61, p < 0.001) for A versus R, 0.54 (95% CI 0.42-0.70, p < 0.001) for A versus E, 1.50 (95% CI 1.17-1.92, p = 0.001) for R versus D, 1.15 (95% CI 0.95-1.39, p = 0.16) for R versus E and 1.31 (95% CI 1.02-1.68, p = 0.04) for E versus D. Overall, apixaban appears to be associated with a lower risk of bleeding than the other TSOA's. This analysis may be helpful to the clinician in trying to balance risk versus benefit in selecting a new anticoagulant. A dedicated randomized trial directly comparing the new agents would be required to confirm these results.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Survival Analysis; Thiazoles; Venous Thrombosis

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding represents the most common adverse event associated with the use of oral anticoagulant therapy. Due to increasing prescription of anticoagulants worldwide, gastroenterologists are more and more called to deal with bleeding patients taking these medications. Their management is challenging because several issues have to be taken into account, such as the severity of bleeding, the intensity of anticoagulation, the patient's thrombotic risk and endoscopy findings. The recent introduction into the marketplace of new direct oral anticoagulants, for whom specific reversal agents are still lacking, further contributes to make the decision-making process even more demanding. Available evidence on this topic is limited and practice guidelines by gastroenterology societies only marginally address key issues for clinicians, including when and how to reverse coagulopathy, the optimal timing of endoscopy and when and how to resume anticoagulation thereafter. The present paper reviews the evidence in the literature and provides practical algorithms to support clinicians in the management of patients on anticoagulants who present with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Acute Disease; Algorithms; Anticoagulants; Coagulants; Dabigatran; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Rivaroxaban; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) specifically target factor IIa or Xa and represent a major step forward in the treatment of acute- and long-term prevention of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE). They are at least as effective and as safe as conventional therapy (heparins and vitamin-K inhibitors) and have practical advantages, such as fixed dosing and no need for laboratory monitoring. These antithrombotic agents introduce a new paradigm for the day-to-day management of VTE. Direct oral anticoagulants should streamline the management of most patients with VTE and will facilitate care in the outpatient setting. Nevertheless, it remains uncertain how to select specific DOACs for particular profiles of patients, and the optimal management of bleeding complications is evolving.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Long-Term Care; Morpholines; Perioperative Care; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients is challenging, owing to a high risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding complications. The anticoagulants of choice are low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), because of a proven higher efficacy than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and a similar bleeding profile. The recently introduced new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have the potential to be alternative options for these patients, as these drugs share practical advantages with LMWH, are administered orally, and had similar efficacy to VKAs but a lower bleeding risk in phase 3 studies in the general VTE population.. A systematic literature search was performed to identify phase 3 trials investigating NOACs for the treatment of VTE. The efficacy outcome was recurrent VTE, and the safety outcome was major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Pooled incidence rates and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for cancer patients and non-cancer patients separately.. Five studies were included, with 19 060 patients, of whom 973 (5.1%) had active cancer. The pooled incidence rates of recurrent VTE were 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-6.0) in cancer patients treated with NOACs, and 6.1% (95% CI 4.1-8.5) in patients treated with VKAs (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.38-1.2). The pooled incidence rates of major or non-major clinically relevant bleeding were 15% (95% CI 12-18) in cancer patients treated with NOACs, and 16% (95% CI 9.9-22) in patients treated with VKAs (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.70-1.3). These results form a solid basis for the initiation of a head-to-head comparison of NOACs with LMWH in cancer patients.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Risk; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

In the last 4 years, 6 phase 3 trials including a total of 27,023 patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). To aid the clinician in assessing the amount of information, we address frequently raised clinical questions in a review of combined trial results. We included the phase 3 trials that compared dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban with VKA therapy in patients with acute symptomatic VTE. Recurrent VTE occurred in 2.0% of DOAC recipients compared with 2.2% in VKA recipients (relative risk [RR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.06). Treatment with a DOAC significantly reduced the risk of major bleeding (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83). In parallel, intracranial bleeding, fatal bleeding, and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred significantly less in DOAC recipients. The efficacy and safety of DOACs were consistent in patients with pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, a body weight ≥100 kg, moderate renal insufficiency, an age ≥75 years, and cancer. In conclusion, DOACs and VKAs have similar efficacy in the treatment of acute symptomatic VTE, a finding that is consistent in key clinical subgroups. Treatment with a DOAC significantly reduces the risks of major bleeding.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

To compare key features of the new oral anticoagulants (NOACs)-dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban-and to address questions that arise when comparing the NOACs.. PubMed was searched for recent (January 2008 to week 32 of 2013) clinical studies relating to NOAC use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE).. All NOACs are at least as effective as warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF, and are at least as safe in terms of bleeding risk according to 3 large trials. Meta-analyses of these trials have shown that, compared with warfarin therapy, NOACs reduced total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and intracranial bleeding, and there was a trend toward less overall bleeding. Practical advantages of NOACs over warfarin include fixed once- or twice-daily oral dosing without the need for coagulation monitoring, and few known or defined drug or food interactions. Potential drawbacks of NOACs include a risk of bleeding that might be increased in patients older than 75 years, increased major gastrointestinal bleeding with high-dose dabigatran, increased dyspepsia with dabigatran, the lack of a routine laboratory test to reliably measure anticoagulant effect, and the lack of an antidote for reversal. No direct comparisons of NOACs have been made in randomized controlled trials, and the choice of NOAC is influenced by individual patient characteristics, including risk of stroke or VTE, risk of bleeding, and comorbidity (eg, renal dysfunction).. The NOACs represent important alternatives in the management of patients with AF and VTE, especially for patients who have difficulty accessing regular coagulation monitoring. The companion to this article addresses common "what if" questions that arise in the long-term clinical follow-up and management of patients receiving NOACs.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Antidotes; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Drug Monitoring; Family Practice; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Novel oral anticoagulants that directly inhibit thrombin (dabigatran) or factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban) are currently available for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after orthopaedic surgery, treatment of acute VTE, and prevention of arterial thromboembolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. These agents offer advantages over VKAs, including rapid onset, shorter half-lives, fewer drug interactions, and lack of need for routine monitoring. However, there are no established agents to reverse their anticoagulant effect. We review the risk of bleeding with the novel oral anticoagulants and the limitations of conventional coagulation assays for measuring anticoagulant effect. We provide an approach to the management of patients with bleeding complications with evidence for various interventions for reversal, where available.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Morpholines; Plasma; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at heightened risk of acute limb ischemia (ALI), a thrombotic event associated with amputation, disability, and mortality. Previous lower extremity revascularization (LER) is associated with increased ALI risk in chronic PAD. However, the pattern of risk, clinical correlates, and outcomes after ALI early after LER are not well-studied, and effective therapies to reduce ALI post-LER are lacking.. The VOYAGER PAD trial (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA [Acetylsalicylic Acid] Along With Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for PAD; rNCT02504216) randomized patients with PAD undergoing LER to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily or placebo on a background of low-dose aspirin. The primary outcome was a composite of ALI, major amputation of vascular cause, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death. ALI was prospectively ascertained and adjudicated by a blinded committee. The cumulative incidence of ALI was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to generate hazard ratios and associated CIs. Analyses were performed as intention-to-treat.. After LER for symptomatic PAD, ALI is frequent, particularly early after LER, and is associated with poor prognosis. Low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduces ALI after LER, including ALI events associated with the most severe outcomes. The benefit of rivaroxaban for ALI appears early, continues over time, and is consistent regardless of revascularization approach or clopidogrel use.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aspirin; Female; Humans; Ischemia; Lower Extremity; Male; Middle Aged; Numbers Needed To Treat; Rivaroxaban

Patients with renal impairment are at higher risk of thrombosis and bleeding than those with normal renal function. The optimal rivaroxaban dose for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with renal impairment is unknown. MARINER and MAGELLAN were multicenter, randomized clinical trials of rivaroxaban in acutely ill medical patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with renal impairment in MARINER (7.5 mg once daily) were compared with those in patients with normal renal function in MARINER (10 mg once daily) and in a subpopulation of MAGELLAN that excluded patients at high risk for bleeding at baseline (10 mg once daily). Compared with enoxaparin/placebo in the MAGELLAN subpopulation, the relative risk (RR) of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related death with rivaroxaban 10 mg in patients with renal impairment (RR = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-1.44) was similar to that in those with normal renal function (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.44-1.40), while in MARINER, the 7.5 mg dose did not reduce the risk in patients with renal impairment (hazard ratio = 1.00; 95% CI 0.52-1.92). Major bleeding with rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily was higher in patients with renal impairment than in those with normal renal function in MAGELLAN (1.54% vs. 0.98%) and in the MAGELLAN subpopulation (0.94% vs. 0.61%). At a dose of 10 mg once daily, rivaroxaban is effective for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with impaired or normal renal function. The safety of this regimen is enhanced without loss of efficacy by excluding patients at high risk for bleeding, but not by using a reduced-dose strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION:  ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00571649 for the MAGELLAN trial, NCT02111564 for the MARINER trial.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Hospitalized acutely ill medical patients are at risk for fatal and major thromboembolic events. Whether use of extended-duration primary thromboprophylaxis can prevent such events is unknown.. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether extended-duration rivaroxaban reduces the risk of venous and arterial fatal and major thromboembolic events without significantly increasing major bleeding in acutely ill medical patients after discharge.. MARINER (A Study of Rivaroxaban [JNJ-39039039] on the Venous Thromboembolic Risk in Post-Hospital Discharge Patients) studied acutely ill medical patients with additional risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Medically ill patients with a baseline creatinine clearance ≥50 ml/min were randomized in a double-blind fashion to rivaroxaban 10 mg or placebo daily at hospital discharge for 45 days. Exploratory efficacy analyses were performed with the intent-to-treat population including all data through day 45. Time-to-event curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A blinded independent committee adjudicated all clinical events.. In total, 4,909 patients were assigned to rivaroxaban and 4,913 patients to placebo. The mean age was 67.8 years, 55.5% were men, mean baseline creatinine clearance was 87.8 ml/min, and mean duration of hospitalization was 6.7 days. The pre-specified composite efficacy endpoint (symptomatic VTE, myocardial infarction, nonhemorrhagic stroke, and cardiovascular death) occurred in 1.28% and 1.77% of patients in the rivaroxaban and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.52 to 1.00; p = 0.049), whereas major bleeding occurred in 0.27% and 0.18% of patients in the rivaroxaban and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio: 1.44; 95% confidence interval: 0.62 to 3.37; p = 0.398).. Extended-duration rivaroxaban in hospitalized medically ill patients resulted in a 28% reduction in fatal and major thromboembolic events without a significant increase in major bleeding. (A Study of Rivaroxaban [JNJ-39039039] on the Venous Thromboembolic Risk in Post-Hospital Discharge Patients [MARINER]; NCT02111564).

Topics: Acute Disease; Aftercare; Aged; Chemoprevention; Double-Blind Method; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Discharge; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Limited data are available regarding the efficacy of rivaroxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for the treatment of VTE in active cancer patients.. In this prospective, multicenter, open-label trial (NCT01989845), we enrolled patients with active cancer and objectively diagnosed lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), or both from November 2013 to June 2016. Active cancer was defined as a histologically confirmed malignancy, which was diagnosed or treated within the previous 6 months, or as a recurrent/ metastatic cancer. Patients received oral rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily for first 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily for 6 months. The primary outcome was the symptomatic recurrent VTE and the secondary outcomes included any recurrent VTE, major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding events, and overall mortality. All study outcomes were validated by blinded central adjudication.. Of 124 patients enrolled, 110 (88.7%) had solid cancer, 93 (75.0%) had metastatic disease, and 110 (88.7%) were receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. During the 6-month study period, seven patients experienced symptomatic recurrent VTE (cumulative incidence, 5.9%), and two patients experienced incidental recurrent PE (cumulative incidence of any recurrent VTE, 7.6%). Major bleeding events occurred in six patients (cumulative incidence, 5.3%) and CRNM bleeding events in 11 patients (cumulative incidence, 10.2%). Twenty-eight patients (overall mortality, 24.0%) died.. Rivaroxaban is effective and safe for the treatment of VTE in patients with active cancer.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Coagulation; Drug Administration Schedule; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Recurrence; Republic of Korea; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are frequently used for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE), but both clinical and laboratory data comparing their efficacy and safety are conflicting. This study investigated and compared the impact of three DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran) on coagulation cascade in acute PE patients.. After the initial treatment, acute PE patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups, and treatment continued using one of the three DOACs. Following 1 month of treatment, the activity of factors II, VII and VIII, as well as protein C, antithrombin, D-dimer and fibrinogen, were measured, and the values were compared between the groups.. One hundred consecutive PE patients were included. The mean values for the activity of factors II and VII and protein C were higher in patients on apixaban than in patients on rivaroxaban (1.45 ± 1.12 (IU/mL) vs 1.13 ± 0.92 (IU/mL), P < 0.001; 1.24 ± 1.10 (IU/mL) vs 1.05 ± 0.98 (IU/mL), P = 0.024 and 1.15 ± 0.62 vs 1.02 ± 0.68 (IU/mL), P = 0.019, respectively). The mean of factor II activity and the median of factor VIII activity were also significantly higher in patients on apixaban than in patients on dabigatran (1.45 ± 1.12 vs 1.20 ± 0.96 (IU/mL), P = 0.003 and 2.9 (2.0-4.0) vs 2.1 (1.5-2.7) (IU/mL), P = 0.001, respectively). No difference was noticed in D-dimer concentrations, or in the activity of the other factors measured. Additionally, no difference was noticed between the rivaroxaban and dabigatran groups.. Apixaban had a significantly higher thrombin activity, above the laboratory determined normal range, compared to patients on rivaroxaban and dabigatran. This higher thrombin activity in patients on apixaban may contribute to a better haemostatic response during the therapy or increased prothrombotic state after therapy interruption.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Factors; Dabigatran; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thrombin; Treatment Outcome

Rivaroxaban is a target-specific oral anticoagulant approved for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). On its major clinical trials, treatment was initiated directly with a 3-week dose of oral 15 mg twice daily followed by 20 mg every day for at least 3 months. We retrospectively evaluated an initial therapy for confirmed VTE with 1 to 18 days of enoxaparin (1 mg/kg twice daily parenteral) followed by oral rivaroxaban 20 mg every day. Of 49 patients, we found no symptomatic recurrence, no major bleeding, and only 1 clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. We concluded in this pilot study that it is safe and effective to treat patients with enoxaparin course followed directly by a dose of 20 mg of rivaroxaban.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Enoxaparin; Female; Humans; Lower Extremity; Male; Middle Aged; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is a recombinant modified human factor Xa decoy protein that has been shown to reverse the inhibition of factor Xa in healthy volunteers.. In this multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-group study, we evaluated 67 patients who had acute major bleeding within 18 hours after the administration of a factor Xa inhibitor. The patients all received a bolus of andexanet followed by a 2-hour infusion of the drug. Patients were evaluated for changes in measures of anti-factor Xa activity and were assessed for clinical hemostatic efficacy during a 12-hour period. All the patients were subsequently followed for 30 days. The efficacy population of 47 patients had a baseline value for anti-factor Xa activity of at least 75 ng per milliliter (or ≥0.5 IU per milliliter for those receiving enoxaparin) and had confirmed bleeding severity at adjudication.. The mean age of the patients was 77 years; most of the patients had substantial cardiovascular disease. Bleeding was predominantly gastrointestinal or intracranial. The mean (±SD) time from emergency department presentation to the administration of the andexanet bolus was 4.8±1.8 hours. After the bolus administration, the median anti-factor Xa activity decreased by 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58 to 94) from baseline among patients receiving rivaroxaban and by 93% (95% CI, 87 to 94) among patients receiving apixaban. These levels remained similar during the 2-hour infusion. Four hours after the end of the infusion, there was a relative decrease from baseline of 39% in the measure of anti-factor Xa activity among patients receiving rivaroxaban and of 30% among those receiving apixaban. Twelve hours after the andexanet infusion, clinical hemostasis was adjudicated as excellent or good in 37 of 47 patients in the efficacy analysis (79%; 95% CI, 64 to 89). Thrombotic events occurred in 12 of 67 patients (18%) during the 30-day follow-up.. On the basis of a descriptive preliminary analysis, an initial bolus and subsequent 2-hour infusion of andexanet substantially reduced anti-factor Xa activity in patients with acute major bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitors, with effective hemostasis occurring in 79%. (Funded by Portola Pharmaceuticals; ANNEXA-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02329327 .).

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Diseases; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Morpholines; Patient Satisfaction; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

D-dimer concentrations have not been evaluated extensively as a predictor of increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients.. To analyze the relationships between D-dimer concentration, VTE and bleeding in the MAGELLAN trial (NCT00571649).. This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Patients aged ≥ 40 years, hospitalized for acute medical illnesses with risk factors for VTE received subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for 10 ± 4 days then placebo up to day 35, or oral rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 35 ± 4 days. Patients (n = 7581) were grouped by baseline D-dimer ≤ 2 × or > 2 × the upper limit of normal. VTE and major plus non-major clinically relevant bleeding were recorded at day 10, day 35, and between days 11 and 35.. The frequency of VTE was 3.5-fold greater in patients with high D-dimer concentrations. Multivariate analysis showed that D-dimer was an independent predictor of the risk of VTE (odds ratio 2.29 [95% confidence interval 1.75-2.98]), and had a similar association to established risk factors for VTE, for example cancer and advanced age. In the high D-dimer group, rivaroxaban was non-inferior to enoxaparin at day 10 and, unlike the low D-dimer group, superior to placebo at day 35 (P < 0.001) and days 11-35 (P < 0.001). In both groups, bleeding outcomes favored enoxaparin/placebo.. Elevated baseline D-dimer concentrations may identify acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients at high risk of VTE for whom extended anticoagulant prophylaxis may provide greater benefit than for those with low D-dimer concentrations.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Multivariate Analysis; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) and the prevention of recurrent DVT and PE as a fixed-dose, single-drug regimen that does not require initial heparinisation, routine coagulation monitoring or dose adjustment. This study evaluated patient-reported treatment satisfaction in EINSTEIN DVT--a large, open-label, randomised study that compared rivaroxaban with enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy in patients with acute symptomatic DVT without PE. As part of EINSTEIN DVT, a total of 1,472 patients in seven countries were asked to complete a new, validated measure of treatment satisfaction--the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS)--at scheduled visits throughout 12 months of treatment. ACTS scores were compared between study groups in the intention-to-treat population. Patients reported greater satisfaction in the rivaroxaban group compared with the enoxaparin/VKA group, with higher mean ACTS scores across visits. Mean ACTS Burdens scores were 55.2 vs 52.6 (p<0.0001) in favour of rivaroxaban, equivalent to a moderate effect size of 0.42. The treatment effect was consistent over time, with the mean score difference ranging from 2.18 (month 2) to 3.18 (month 12). Overall mean ACTS Benefits scores were 11.7 vs 11.5 in favour of rivaroxaban (p=0.006). This was associated with a small overall effect size of 0.12. The improvement in ACTS Benefits for rivaroxaban became apparent at month 2 and subsequent visits. Rivaroxaban results in improved treatment satisfaction compared with enoxaparin/VKA among patients with DVT, particularly in reducing patient-reported anticoagulation burden.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Patient Satisfaction; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thrombosis

The clinically appropriate duration of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with acute medical illnesses is unknown. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban administered for an extended period, as compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin administered for a standard period, followed by placebo.. We randomly assigned patients 40 years of age or older who were hospitalized for an acute medical illness to receive subcutaneous enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, for 10±4 days and oral placebo for 35±4 days or to receive subcutaneous placebo for 10±4 days and oral rivaroxaban, 10 mg once daily, for 35±4 days. The primary efficacy outcomes were the composite of asymptomatic proximal or symptomatic venous thromboembolism up to day 10 (noninferiority test) and up to day 35 (superiority test). The principal safety outcome was the composite of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.. A total of 8101 patients underwent randomization. A primary efficacy outcome event occurred in 78 of 2938 patients (2.7%) receiving rivaroxaban and 82 of 2993 patients (2.7%) receiving enoxaparin at day 10 (relative risk with rivaroxaban, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 1.31; P=0.003 for noninferiority) and in 131 of 2967 patients (4.4%) who received rivaroxaban and 175 of 3057 patients (5.7%) who received enoxaparin followed by placebo at day 35 (relative risk, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.96; P=0.02). A principal safety outcome event occurred in 111 of 3997 patients (2.8%) in the rivaroxaban group and 49 of 4001 patients (1.2%) in the enoxaparin group at day 10 (P<0.001) and in 164 patients (4.1%) and 67 patients (1.7%) in the respective groups at day 35 (P<0.001).. In acutely ill medical patients, rivaroxaban was noninferior to enoxaparin for standard-duration thromboprophylaxis. Extended-duration rivaroxaban reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of bleeding. (Funded by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Research and Development; MAGELLAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00571649.).

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism

Patients with acute medical illnesses are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended in these patients but questions remain regarding the optimal duration of therapy. The aim of this study is to determine whether oral rivaroxaban is non-inferior to standard-duration (approximately 10 days) subcutaneous (s.c.) enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE in acutely ill medical patients, and whether extended-duration (approximately 5 weeks) rivaroxaban is superior to standard-duration enoxaparin. Patients aged 40 years or older and hospitalized for various acute medical illnesses with risk factors for VTE randomly receive either s.c. enoxaparin 40 mg once daily (od) for 10 ± 4 days or oral rivaroxaban 10 mg od for 35 ± 4 days. The primary efficacy outcomes are the composite of asymptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), symptomatic DVT, symptomatic non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and VTE-related death up to day 10 + 4 and up to day 35 + 4. The primary safety outcome is the composite of treatment-emergent major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. As of July 2010, 8,101 patients from 52 countries have been randomized. These patients have a broad range of medical conditions: approximately one-third were diagnosed with acute heart failure, just under one-third were diagnosed with acute infectious disease, and just under one-quarter were diagnosed with acute respiratory insufficiency. MAGELLAN will determine the efficacy, safety, and pharmacological profile of oral rivaroxaban for the prevention of VTE in a diverse population of medically ill patients and the potential of extended-duration therapy to reduce incidence of VTE.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Infections; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pulmonary Embolism; Respiratory Insufficiency; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor, which is at an advanced stage of clinical development for prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Two phase II studies, ODIXa-DVT and EINSTEIN DVT, assessed the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban (once daily or twice daily) for treatment of acute deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses of rivaroxaban in patients in these two phase II studies were conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban and the relationship between important patient covariates and model parameters. Exposure simulations in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were also performed in order to predict the exposure of rivaroxaban, using modified demographic data reflecting the characteristics of a typical AF population.. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using plasma samples from these patients. Various simulations were conducted to explore the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in patients with DVT and to predict exposure in those with AF. Correlations between plasma rivaroxaban concentrations and the prothrombin time, Factor Xa activity, HepTest® and activated partial thromboplastin time were also described.. The pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in patients with DVT were found to be consistent and predictable across all doses studied. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased dose dependently. The same total daily doses given once daily achieved higher maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) values (∼20%) and lower trough (minimum) plasma concentration (C(trough)) values (∼60%) than when given twice daily; however, the 5th-95th percentile ranges for these parameters overlapped. Rivaroxaban clearance was moderately influenced by age and renal function, and the volume of distribution was influenced by age, body weight and sex; the effects were within the observed interindividual variability. Simulations in virtual patient populations with AF showed that a rivaroxaban dose of 15 mg once daily in patients with creatinine clearance of 30-49 mL/min would achieve AUC and C(max) values similar to those observed with 20 mg once daily in patients with normal renal function. The prothrombin time correlated almost linearly with plasma rivaroxaban concentrations (≤500 μg/L).. Population analyses of phase II clinical data indicated that the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of all rivaroxaban doses were predictable and were affected by expected demographic factors in patients with acute DVT.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Body Weight; Computer Simulation; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Venous Thrombosis; Young Adult

Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may provide a simple, fixed-dose regimen for treating acute deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and for continued treatment, without the need for laboratory monitoring.. We conducted an open-label, randomized, event-driven, noninferiority study that compared oral rivaroxaban alone (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily) with subcutaneous enoxaparin followed by a vitamin K antagonist (either warfarin or acenocoumarol) for 3, 6, or 12 months in patients with acute, symptomatic DVT. In parallel, we carried out a double-blind, randomized, event-driven superiority study that compared rivaroxaban alone (20 mg once daily) with placebo for an additional 6 or 12 months in patients who had completed 6 to 12 months of treatment for venous thromboembolism. The primary efficacy outcome for both studies was recurrent venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in the initial-treatment study and major bleeding in the continued-treatment study.. The study of rivaroxaban for acute DVT included 3449 patients: 1731 given rivaroxaban and 1718 given enoxaparin plus a vitamin K antagonist. Rivaroxaban had noninferior efficacy with respect to the primary outcome (36 events [2.1%], vs. 51 events with enoxaparin-vitamin K antagonist [3.0%]; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 1.04; P<0.001). The principal safety outcome occurred in 8.1% of the patients in each group. In the continued-treatment study, which included 602 patients in the rivaroxaban group and 594 in the placebo group, rivaroxaban had superior efficacy (8 events [1.3%], vs. 42 with placebo [7.1%]; hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.39; P<0.001). Four patients in the rivaroxaban group had nonfatal major bleeding (0.7%), versus none in the placebo group (P=0.11).. Rivaroxaban offers a simple, single-drug approach to the short-term and continued treatment of venous thrombosis that may improve the benefit-to-risk profile of anticoagulation. (Funded by Bayer Schering Pharma and Ortho-McNeil; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00440193 and NCT00439725.).

Topics: Acenocoumarol; Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticoagulants; Double-Blind Method; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Vitamin K; Warfarin

We performed a randomized dose-ranging study, double-blind for rivaroxaban doses and open-label for the comparator (low-molecular-weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists) to assess the optimal dose of rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. A total of 543 patients with acute deep-venous thrombosis received rivaroxaban 20, 30, or 40 mg once daily or comparator. Treatment lasted for 84 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the 3-month incidence of the composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolic complications and asymptomatic deterioration in thrombotic burden as assessed by comparison of ultrasound and perfusion lung scanning at day 84 with baseline. The main safety outcome was the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. A total of 449 (83%) of the 543 patients could be included in the per-protocol population. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 6.1%, 5.4%, and 6.6% of the rivaroxaban 20-, 30-, and 40-mg treatment groups, respectively, and in 9.9% of those receiving standard therapy. The main safety outcome occurred in 5.9%, 6.0%, and 2.2% of the rivaroxaban 20-, 30-, and 40-mg treatment groups, respectively, and in 8.8% of those receiving standard therapy. These results with simple fixed-dose oral regimens justify phase 3 evaluations (www.ClinicalTrials.gov no.NCT00395772).

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombin III; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography; Venous Thrombosis

We assessed the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT).. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding were assessed.. Short-term, low-dose rivaroxaban seems safe and effective for IDDVT treatment.

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

The role of the right to left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio in predicating long-term outcomes in patients with pulmonary thromboembolisms (PTEs) treated with direct oral anticoagulants is unclear.We investigated the association between the RV/LV diameter ratio and clinical outcomes in PTE patients under rivaroxaban from the data of a multicenter, prospective, observational study (J'xactly Study) in Japanese patients with acute venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) including deep vein thromboses, PTEs, or both. Of a total of 1,039 patients with an acute VTE (from December 2016 to April 2018), 429 were diagnosed with PTEs, however, the population in this study consists of 216 patients in whom the RV/LV diameter ratio measured on the axial CT or transthoracic echocardiogram was available.The RV/LV diameter ratio increased significantly with the severity of the PTE classification (nonmassive 0.79 [0.67-0.93], submassive 1.10 [0.83-1.31], massive 1.13 [0.94-1.19], arrest or collapse 1.38 [0.66-2.38], P < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 624 (550-690) days, a sum of the composite adverse events including recurrent VTEs, acute coronary syndrome, ischemic strokes, death from any cause, or major bleeding events occurred in 26 patients (12.0%, 7.58 events per 100 patient-years). Multivariate analysis revealed that an RV/LV diameter ratio ≥ 1.0 had no association with the incidence of composite adverse events (HR 1.34, 95% confidence interval 0.59-2.91, P = 0.48).In summary, in Japanese PTE patients under rivaroxaban, the RV/LV diameter ratio measured on the CT or transthoracic echocardiogram was associated with the PTE severity, but not with the clinical outcomes.

Topics: Acute Disease; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thrombosis

In the last decade, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been incorporated as an anticoagulation tool in patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Although they have a better pharmacological profile than vitamin K antagonists (VKA), the use of these drugs is not massive. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of DOACs in patients with acute PE and to detect determinants of its use.. Prespecified analysis of the CONAREC XX registry that included patients with acute PE in 64 centers in Argentina. An analysis was performed to detect predictors of DOAC prescription at discharge.. 579 patients who received anticoagulation at hospital discharge were analyzed: 60% received VKA, 21% heparin and 19% DOAC (of them, 49% Rivaroxaban, 34% Apixaban, and 17% Dabigatran). Patients receiving DOACs had less severe PE, lower risk of bleeding, and fewer in-hospital complications. At 30-day follow-up, there were no differences in all-cause mortality or bleeding. Health coverage by social insurance (OR 7.45, CI 95% 1.74-31.9, p < 0.01) or by private coverage (OR 10.5, CI 95% 2.4-45.9, p < 0.01) were independent predictors of DOAC prescription at discharge, and history of heart failure (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.84, p = 0.028) and oncological disease (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89; p = 0.02) were predictors not prescribe them.. One in five survivors of acute PE received DOACs at hospital discharge in Argentina, and this was determined by clinical and economic variables.. En la última década los anticoagulantes orales directos (ACOD) se incorporaron como herramienta para la anticoagulación en pacientes con tromboembolia pulmonar (TEP) aguda. Aunque tienen un mejor perfil farmacológico que los antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK), el uso de estos fármacos no es masivo. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el uso de ACOD en pacientes con TEP aguda y detectar determinantes de su indicación.. Análisis preespecificado del registro CONAREC XX que incorporó pacientes con TEP aguda en 64 centros de Argentina. Se realizó un análisis para detectar predictores de prescripción de ACOD al alta.. Se analizaron 579 pacientes que recibieron anticoagulación al alta hospitalaria: el 60% recibió AVK, el 21% heparinas y el 19% ACOD (de ellos, un 49% rivaroxabán, un 34% apixabán y un 17% dabigatrán). Los pacientes que recibieron ACOD tenían TEP de menor gravedad, menor riesgo de hemorragia y menos complicaciones intrahospitalarias. En el seguimiento a 30 días no hubo diferencias en mortalidad por todas las causas o sangrados. La cobertura de salud por un seguro social (odds ratio [OR] 7.45; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 1.74-31.9; p < 0.01) o por cobertura privada (OR 10.5; IC 95%: 2.4-45.9; p < 0.01) fueron predictores independientes de la prescripción de ACOD al alta, y el antecedente de insuficiencia cardiaca (OR 0.19; IC 95%: 0.04-0.84; p = 0.028) y de enfermedad oncológica (OR 0.49; IC 95%: 0.27-0.89; p = 0.02) fueron predictores de no prescribirlos.. Uno de cada cinco supervivientes de TEP aguda recibió ACOD al egreso hospitalario en Argentina, y esto fue determinado por variables clínicas y económicas.

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban

BACKGROUND Two Pediatric Patients with Splanchnic Venous Thrombosis as a Complication of Acute Pancreatitis Successfully Treated with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Rivaroxaban CASE REPORT Case 1: A 13-year-old girl presented with a second attack of acute pancreatitis. She developed a non-occlusive splenic vein thrombosis diagnosed by CT scan on the sixth day of hospitalization. Injectable low-molecular-weight heparin was started during hospitalization and switched to oral rivaroxaban at discharge. Imaging at follow-up showed resolution of thrombosis. Case 2: A 9-year-old girl with history of acute recurrent pancreatitis presented with a third attack of acute pancreatitis. An occlusive splenic vein thrombosis with extension into the portal vein and superior mesenteric vein and necrotizing pancreatitis was seen on CT scan on the third day of hospitalization. Low-molecular-weight heparin was initiated during hospitalization and was switched to oral rivaroxaban at discharge. Imaging at follow-up demonstrated nearly complete resolution of the extensive thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS Splanchnic venous thrombosis remains a rare complication of pediatric pancreatitis. Anticoagulant use in patients with these complications remains controversial. Direct oral anticoagulants are as safe and effective as low-molecular-weight heparin and should be considered for use in children instead of low-molecular-weight heparin due to its advantages, including the availability of enteral forms of administration.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Anticoagulants; Child; Female; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Pancreatitis; Rivaroxaban; Splenic Vein; Thrombosis; Venous Thrombosis

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening disease, which accounts for the major type of venous thromboembolism. Currently, there is limited understanding and management for PE. Rivaroxaban is reported to treat patients with PE. However, there is still insufficient evidence on rivaroxaban for the treatment of Chinese patients with acute PE. Thus, this retrospective study investigated the benefits and safety of rivaroxaban for Chinese patients with acute PE.A total of 72 Chinese patient cases with acute PE were analyzed in this study. Of these, 36 cases who received rivaroxaban mono-therapy were assigned to the treatment group, while the remaining 36 cases who received standard therapy were assigned to the control group. The benefits were assessed by the duration of hospital stay, treatment satisfaction, and safety.After treatment, rivaroxaban mono-therapy showed better benefits in decreasing the duration of hospital stay (P < .01), increasing treatment satisfaction (P < .01), and reducing mild bleeding (P = .02) in Chinese patients with acute PE, than standard therapy.The results of this study indicated that rivaroxaban may provide more benefits than the standard therapy for Chinese patients with acute PE. Future studies are still needed to warrant the current results.

Topics: Acute Disease; China; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Pulmonary Embolism; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome

Residual perfusion defects (RPD) as detected by lung scintigraphy occur in over 50% of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) treated with vitamin K antagonists but there is lack of data in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. The aim of this retrospective study was to estimate the incidence of RPD detected by ventilation perfusion (VQ) scan at 3-6 months in patients with first acute symptomatic PE treated with rivaroxaban compared to warfarin. Consecutive eligible patients treated with rivaroxaban as part of a previous study were identified. The Monash Health Radiology database was used to identify a historical cohort of age matched (± 5 years) patients treated with warfarin. Follow-up VQ scans were classified as normal (no perfusion defect) or abnormal (matched or unmatched perfusion defects) by two independent nuclear medicine physicians blinded to treatment. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus. One hundred and ninety patients with PE (95 in each cohort) were included (mean age 56.8 years; 41.1% males; 54.2% unprovoked). In the overall cohort, 31.1% had RPD with a significantly lower incidence of RPD in rivaroxaban treated patients 23.2% (95% CI 15.8-32.6), compared to warfarin 38.9% (95% CI 29.8-49.0). Treatment with rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly lower incidence of RPD detected by VQ scan at 3-6 months compared to warfarin. This supports recent in-vitro data suggesting an indirect enhancement of fibrinolysis by direct oral Xa inhibitors but requires confirmation in larger studies.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Perfusion Imaging; Pulmonary Embolism; Radionuclide Imaging; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Since 2012 four direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Clinical trials comparing DOACs to warfarin included more than 13,500 patients. However, included patients were all age 39 years or older. We sought to describe real-world use of DOACs among young adults with acute VTE. Multi-center retrospective case series of young adult patients (age 18-40 years) at two large academic medical centers who initiated any DOAC for VTE therapy in 2015 or 2016. Thrombotic and bleeding events as well as off-label drug use were described using summary statistics. Fifty-seven patients were identified (63.2% female). One of the 57 patients (1.8%) had a thromboembolic event. Seven of the 57 patients (12.3%) experienced a bleeding event, one categorized as a major bleed and six being categorized as clinically relevant non-major bleeding. One of the ten (10%) patients receiving apixaban was not initiated on the FDA-recommended 10 mg twice daily for the first 7 days. Seven of the 47 (14.9%) patients receiving rivaroxaban were not initiated on the FDA-recommended 15 mg twice daily dosing for the first 21 days. Bleeding occurred in approximately 14% of young adult patients treated with DOAC therapy. However, only one patient had their DOAC discontinued due to a major bleeding event. Recurrence of DVT while on DOAC therapy was rare.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Age Factors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electronic Health Records; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Off-Label Use; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; United States; Venous Thromboembolism

We report 3 patients with coronavirus disease who had a decline in respiratory status during their hospital course that responded well to intravenous steroids and interleukin-6 receptor antagonist therapy. These patients later showed development of persistent hypoxia with increased levels of d-dimer levels and were given a diagnosis of pulmonary embolisms.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Betacoronavirus; Biomarkers; Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Coronavirus Infections; COVID-19; COVID-19 Testing; Cytokine Release Syndrome; Enoxaparin; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Humans; Hypoxia; Male; Methylprednisolone Hemisuccinate; Middle Aged; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; SARS-CoV-2; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

The full spectrum of COVID-19 is still emerging, although several studies have highlighted that patients infected with the novel coronavirus can potentially develop a hypercoagulable state. However, several aspects related to the incidence and pathophysiology of the association between COVID-19 and pulmonary embolism are not well established. Here, we present a case of a patient with COVID-19 who developed acute pulmonary embolism. Clinical and laboratory data and findings of non-enhanced CT indicate possibility of acute pulmonary embolism, and support the decision to proceed with computed tomography pulmonary angiography that can objectively identify filling defects in pulmonary arterial branches.

Topics: Acute Disease; Betacoronavirus; Computed Tomography Angiography; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; SARS-CoV-2

To investigate the association of extremes in bodyweight (EBW) and outcomes in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding were compared between patients with bodyweight <60 kg, 60-120 kg, and >120 kg.. Consecutive patients enrolled in the Mayo Clinic VTE Registry (03/28/2013-8/31/2019) with acute VTE were followed prospectively. Patient status was assessed in person, by mailing a written questionnaire, or by a scripted phone interview.. Among 2577 patients with weight ranging from 27.0 kg to 263.2 kg, 2123 (82%) had a bodyweight between 60 and 120 kg, 223 (8.7%) had bodyweight < 60 kg, and 230 (8.9%) had bodyweight >120 kg. Patients with bodyweight <60 kg treated with DOACs had higher 3- and 6-month incidence of major bleeding compared to the bodyweight 60-120kg group (4.4% vs 1.1%, P = .03, and 4.4% vs 1.4%, P = .05, respectively). Patients with bodyweight >120 kg and cancer on rivaroxaban had higher VTE recurrence compared to bodyweight 60-120kg group (P = .01).. Treatment of acute VTE is associated with a higher incidence of bleeding in patients with bodyweight <60 kg. A higher VTE recurrence rate occurred only in cancer patients with bodyweight >120 kg on rivaroxaban.

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Body Weight; Disease Management; Drug Therapy, Combination; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Health Care Surveys; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Registries; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

The present article addresses clinical challenges associated with the choice of the anticoagulant agent, the definition of the duration of anticoagulant treatment and the assessment of the risk-to-benefit ratio of prolonged anticoagulation for patients with pulmonary embolism (PE).Anticoagulation is performed with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in hemodynamically unstable patients and with low molecular weight heparins (LWMH) or fondaparinux in normotensive patients. In patients with high or intermediate clinical probability of pulmonary embolism, anticoagulation should be initiated without delay while awaiting the results of diagnostic tests. LMWH and fondaparinux are preferred over UFH in the initial anticoagulation of PE since they are associated with a lower risk of bleeding.All patients with PE require therapeutic anticoagulation for at least three months. The current 2019 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommend that all eligible patients should be treated with a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) in preference to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA). In patients with active cancer, Apixaban, Edoxaban and Rivaroxaban are effective alternatives to treatment with LMWH.The decision on the duration of anticoagulation should consider both, the individual risk of PE recurrence and the individual risk of bleeding. The risk for recurrent PE after discontinuation of treatment is related to the features of the index PE event. While patients with a strong transient risk factor have a low risk of recurrence and anticoagulation can be discontinued after three months, patients with strong persistent risk factor (such as active cancer) have a high risk of recurrence and thus should receive anticoagulant treatment of indefinite duration. Given the favourable safety profile of NOACs (especially if a reduced dosage of Apixaban or Rivaroxaban is initiated after at least six months of therapeutic anticoagulation), extended oral anticoagulation of indefinite duration should be considered for all patients with intermediate risk of recurrence.

Topics: Acute Disease; Dalteparin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Fibrinolytic Agents; Fondaparinux; Guideline Adherence; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Long-Term Care; Neoplasms; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Acute Disease; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclophosphamide; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Stents; Stroke; Vitamin K

There is insufficient real-world data on the current status of Japanese patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) or its treatment and prevention with rivaroxaban.Methods and Results:In this multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted in Japan, 1,039 patients with acute symptomatic/asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) with or without DVT prescribed rivaroxaban were enrolled at 152 institutions and observed for a median of 21.3 months. Mean age was 68.0±14.7 years, mean body weight was 60.3±14.1 kg, 59.0% were females, and 19.0% had active cancer. Incidences of recurrence or aggravation of symptomatic VTE (primary effectiveness outcome) and major bleeding (principal safety outcome) were 2.6% and 2.9% per patient-year, respectively. These outcomes did not differ between patients with DVT and those with PE (primary effectiveness outcome: 2.6% vs. 2.5% per patient-year, P=0.810; principal safety outcome: 3.5% vs. 2.4% per patient-year, P=0.394). The incidence of composite clinically relevant events, including recurrence or aggravation of symptomatic VTE, acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, all-cause death, or major bleeding events, was 9.2% per patient-year. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex, being underweight, having active cancer, chronic heart and lung disease, and previous stroke were independent determinants for composite clinically relevant events.. In Japanese clinical practice, a single-drug approach with rivaroxaban was demonstrated to be a valuable treatment for a broad range of VTE patients.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Prior use of direct oral anticoagulants has been associated with reduced stroke severity in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) on stroke severity in patients who were receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban at the time of stroke onset.. We enrolled 107 patients with NVAF who developed acute ischemic stroke while on dabigatran or rivaroxaban and presented within 24 hours to nine hospitals between January 2014 and December 2018. The results of PT and aPTT assays were obtained within 24 hours of stroke onset in all patients. We analyzed PT and aPTT in relation to stroke severity and ischemic lesion volume using correlation and multivariable regression analyses.. Of the 107 patients included, 46 (43.0%) were on dabigatran and 61 (57.0%) were on rivaroxaban. In patients with prior dabigatran use, while aPTT was inversely correlated with admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (r = -0.369, p = 0.012) and ischemic lesion volume (r = -0.480, p = 0.005), there was no correlation between PT and either of these variables. Multivariable analysis confirmed the existence of a significant independent inverse relationship between aPTT and NIHSS score at admission (B, -0.201; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.370 to -0.032; p = 0.005) and between aPTT and ischemic lesion volume (B, -0.076; 95% CI, -0.130 to -0.023; p = 0.007). In patients with prior rivaroxaban use, neither PT nor aPTT was associated with admission NIHSS score or ischemic lesion volume in the correlation and multivariable analyses.. In patients with NVAF who were receiving dabigatran, prolonged aPTT was associated with reduced stroke severity.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Prognosis; Prothrombin Time; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke

Uninterrupted drug therapy during acute illness is often associated with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations. Among warfarin treated patients, these changes are reflected in the INR. However, in the case of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), given that routine laboratory monitoring is not recommended, these changes may result in unforeseen thromboembolic or bleeding events.. To determine the rate of thromboembolic (TEE) and bleeding events associated with uninterrupted DOAC compared to warfarin treatment during acute illness.. A retrospective cohort study of patients treated with DOACs or warfarin, both at steady state, who were hospitalized for acute illness. Primary outcome was any TEE or major bleeding requiring re-hospitalization within one month from discharge. Secondary outcome was a composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) events.. A total of 410 patients continued oral anticoagulant treatment during their hospitalization, of whom 191 (46.6%) were on DOACs and 219 (53.4%) on warfarin, with a total of 18 (4.4%) events. Rates of TEE and major bleeding events did not differ between DOACs and warfarin treated patients (0.9% vs. 0.5% and 0.5% vs. 1%, respectively). Similarly, rate of secondary outcome was comparable between DOACs (4.7%) and warfarin (2.7%, p = 0.29). Sub-analyses demonstrated significantly higher rates among rivaroxaban (10.4%) treated patients compared to warfarin (p = 0.03).. Uninterrupted treatment with DOACs during acute illness is not associated with increased risk for re-hospitalizations due to bleeding or thromboembolic events compared to warfarin. Our results suggest a higher bleeding rate among rivaroxaban treated patients at high bleeding risk.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin

Since novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been introduced in the past decade, the first option of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) treatment is toward NOACs. However, aggressive and early thrombus removal strategy is widely used for treating acute iliofemoral DVT. Consequently, optimal treatment duration, efficacy, and safety of rivaroxaban alone or in combination with catheter-directed intrathrombus thrombolysis (CDT) in acute iliofemoral DVT patients should be investigated.. Patients with recent acute iliofemoral DVT treated with combined CDT-rivaroxaban (CDT) or rivaroxaban alone (control) were followed for mean (standard deviation) of 25.7 (2.5) months. DVT evolution, treatment efficacy and safety, and predisposing factors for patency and postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) development were analyzed through duplex ultrasonography, plethysmography, venography, and computed tomographic venography.. 43.2%, 64.9%, 75.7%, and 72.2% of the CDT patients showed complete patency at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of treatment compared with the control patients having 8.5%, 36.2%, 55.3%, and 57.4% of cumulative patency at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively (p = 0.001, 0.017, 0.088, and 0.081, respectively). The p value of the log-rank test comparing patency rates of the two groups was 0.009. The median (interquartile range, IQR) Villalta scores at 24 months were 3 (2-5) and 6 (4-8) in CDT and control patients, respectively (p = 0·001). PTS and bleeding events during therapy were, respectively, found in 35.1% and 63.8% (p = 0.017) and in 27% and 17% of CDT and control patients (p = 0.4). The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis of cumulative patency at 24 months for 6 months of rivaroxaban treatment was significant (p = 0.016).. Treatment therapy and treatment duration with rivaroxaban alone or in combination with CDT are potentially associated with vein patency at 24 months, and a 6-month lysis rate and obstructive vein can influence PTS development. A larger randomized trial is warranted to confirm these findings.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Catheterization, Peripheral; Female; Femoral Vein; Humans; Iliac Vein; Male; Middle Aged; Postthrombotic Syndrome; Rivaroxaban; Thrombolytic Therapy; Venous Thrombosis

BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) have become increasingly more popular in recent years and have largely replaced warfarin in the treatment of certain conditions, such as atrial fibrillation, and in the prevention of thromboembolic events. Rivaroxaban is one of the most commonly used direct anticoagulant drugs for conditions such as atrial fibrillation and thromboprophylaxis. CASE REPORT We present a case of a 70-year-old male who developed acute interstitial nephritis after starting rivaroxaban, and who responded to medical treatment, which included corticosteroid therapy. A renal biopsy was not performed because the patient was on essential anticoagulation therapy secondary to a high CHADS2VASc score. CONCLUSIONS Dose adjustments when using rivaroxaban are necessary in patients with underlying renal failure. Acute interstitial nephritis is a rare condition associated with direct anticoagulant drugs. The treatment of acute interstitial nephritis is usually to remove the offending agent and treat the underlying cause.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Creatinine; Diagnosis, Differential; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Methylprednisolone; Nephritis, Interstitial; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Acute Disease; Anemia, Iron-Deficiency; Anticoagulants; Cardiotonic Agents; Case-Control Studies; Diuretics; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Heart Aneurysm; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Iron; Myocardial Infarction; Pacemaker, Artificial; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Placebos; Portraits as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Thrombosis; Urea

The highest risk of adverse events for patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is during the early anticoagulation period. However, no established model exists for early clinical monitoring of patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The authors' aim was to evaluate the utility of a nurse-led pathway to minimize adverse events in acute VTE patients starting on rivaroxaban. The rivaroxaban VTE treatment pathway is a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with objectively confirmed VTE between July 2015 and May 2017. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients identified at major risk of adverse events (bleeding or recurrent VTE). Secondary outcomes were rates of interventions, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), recurrent VTE, and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Among 304 participants, 5% (

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Critical Pathways; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Physiologic; Nurse-Patient Relations; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism

Acute mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) is the rarest cause of acute mesenteric ischaemia, so thrombosis of a variant inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is especially uncommon in the setting of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Here, we present such a case of seronegative APS initially manifesting as an anomalous IMV thrombosis in a 76-year-old woman. Although guidelines support anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists in these patients, we anticoagulated with rivaroxaban (a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)) due to patient preference, which resulted in complete clinical and endoscopic resolution. IMV thrombosis is a rare form of MVT, only two case reports describe successful anticoagulation with DOACs in the setting of MVT and none report APS as an underlying aetiology. Therefore, this case provides the opportunity to review the pathophysiology of MVT, APS and their medical management including current trends in anticoagulation.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Diagnosis, Differential; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Mesenteric Veins; Rivaroxaban; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

A 77-year-old woman presented to the hospital with symptoms of progressive shortness of breath with associated right-sided pleuritic pain. The patient had begun noting dyspnea on exertion, limiting her ability to go on hikes over the few days prior to admission. Her medical history is significant for carcinoid tumor status postresection in 2012 without recurrence. She has no history of thromboembolism or clotting disorders, and she has no history of smoking or drug abuse. Current medications include amlodipine, celecoxib, hydrochlorothiazide, and rosuvastatin.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Chest Pain; Dyspnea; Echocardiography; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease; Rivaroxaban; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Venous Thrombosis

Essentials Net benefit of venous thromboprophylaxis (VTE) in patients hospitalized for infections is unknown. MAGELLAN trial subgroup analysis was performed for patients hospitalized for acute infectious diseases. At day 35, prolonged rivaroxaban prophylaxis reduced VTE compared to enoxaparin (4.2% vs. 6.6%). Rivaroxaban prophylaxis reduced VTE in patients hospitalized for active lung infections.. Background Despite the well-established association between infection and venous thromboembolism (VTE), there are few data specifically assessing the efficacy and safety of the VTE prophylaxis strategies for patients hospitalized for acute infectious diseases. Objectives To estimate the incidence of VTE and bleeding outcomes, comparing prolonged prophylaxis with rivaroxaban 10 mg daily for 35 days with enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 10 days. Patients/Methods A subgroup analysis of patients hospitalized for acute infectious diseases in the MAGELLAN trial was performed. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of asymptomatic proximal or symptomatic VTE at days 10 and 35. The principal safety outcome was the composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Results Three thousand one hundred and seventy-three patients with acute infectious diseases leading to hospitalization were randomized to either rivaroxaban (n = 1585) or enoxaparin/placebo (n = 1588), and received at least one dose of study medication. At day 10, primary composite efficacy outcomes did not differ between prophylaxis strategies (rivaroxaban, 2.7%; and enoxaparin, 3.7%). At day 35, there were fewer VTE events with rivaroxaban (4.2%) than with enoxaparin (6.6%) (relative risk [RR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.92). Patients with pulmonary infections randomized to rivaroxaban had a lower incidence of VTE both at 10 days (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28-0.90) and at 35 days (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.87). Primary safety outcome events were increased with rivaroxaban (RR 2.42, 95% CI 1.60-3.66). Conclusions Prolonged rivaroxaban prophylaxis reduced the incidence of VTE in patients hospitalized for acute infectious diseases, particularly those involving the lungs. Efficacy benefits were, in part, offset by bleeding outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT 00571649.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Drug Administration Schedule; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Patient Admission; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Tract Infections; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Essentials Anticoagulants prevent venous thromboembolism but may be associated with greater bleeding risks. Bivariate analysis assumes a non-linear relationship between efficacy and safety outcomes. Extended full-dose betrixaban is favorable over standard enoxaparin in bivariate endpoint. Clinicians must weigh efficacy and safety outcomes in decision-making on thromboprophylaxis.. Background Among acutely ill hospitalized medical patients, extended-duration thromboprophylaxis reduces the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but some pharmacologic strategies have been associated with greater risks of major bleeding, thereby offsetting the net clinical benefit (NCB). Methods To assess the risk-benefit profile of anticoagulation regimens, a previously described bivariate method that does not assume a linear risk-benefit tradeoff and can accommodate different margins for efficacy and safety was performed to simultaneously assess efficacy (symptomatic VTE) and safety (major bleeding) on the basis of data from four randomized controlled trials of extended-duration (30-46 days) versus standard-duration (6-14 days) thromboprophylaxis among 28 227 patients (EXCLAIM, ADOPT, MAGELLAN and APEX trials). Results Extended thromboprophylaxis with full-dose betrixaban (80 mg once daily) was superior in efficacy and non-inferior in safety to standard-duration enoxaparin, and showed a significantly favorable NCB, with a risk difference of - 0.51% (- 0.89% to - 0.10%) in the bivariate outcome. Extended enoxaparin was superior in efficacy and inferior in safety (bivariate outcome: 0.03% [- 0.37% to 0.43%]), whereas apixaban and rivaroxaban were non-inferior in efficacy and inferior in safety (- 0.20% [- 0.49% to 0.17%] and 0.23% [- 0.16% to 0.69%], respectively). Reduced-dose betrixaban did not show a significant difference in either efficacy or safety (0.41% [- 0.85% to 1.94%]). Conclusions In a bivariate analysis that assumes non-linear risk-benefit tradeoffs, extended prophylaxis with full-dose betrixaban was superior to standard-duration enoxaparin, whereas other regimens failed to simultaneously achieve both superiority and non-inferiority with respect to symptomatic VTE and major bleeding in the management of acutely ill hospitalized medical patients.

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Benzamides; Clinical Decision-Making; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Multivariate Analysis; Nonlinear Dynamics; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Rivaroxaban; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

The optimal timing to administer non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation is unclear. This prospective observational multicenter study evaluated the rates of early recurrence and major bleeding (within 90 days) and their timing in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation who received NOACs for secondary prevention.. Recurrence was defined as the composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and symptomatic systemic embolism, and major bleeding was defined as symptomatic cerebral and major extracranial bleeding. For the analysis, 1127 patients were eligible: 381 (33.8%) were treated with dabigatran, 366 (32.5%) with rivaroxaban, and 380 (33.7%) with apixaban. Patients who received dabigatran were younger and had lower admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and less commonly had a CHA. In patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation, treatment with NOACs was associated with a combined 5% rate of ischemic embolic recurrence and severe bleeding within 90 days.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin K

Treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been confined to parenteral agents and oral vitamin K antagonists for decades; however, with the approval of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), clinicians now have more options. This study aims to evaluate the real world prescribing practices of all oral anticoagulants for VTE at a single center. A retrospective cohort analysis of all adult patients diagnosed with acute onset VTE was conducted. Of the 105 patients included in the analysis, 45 (43 %) patients received warfarin and 60 (57 %) patients received a DOAC. Rivaroxaban and apixaban were the most common DOACs initiated. There were significantly more patients in the warfarin group with an eCrCl of <60 ml/min compared to patients who received a DOAC (77.8 % vs. 15 %; P < 0.05). There were significantly less patients in the warfarin group with serum aminotranferase concentrations three times the upper limit of normal compared to those who received a DOAC (15.6 % vs. 55 %; P < 0.05). Patients who received a DOAC had less days on parenteral anticoagulation compared to patients who received warfarin (median 2.5 days [IQR 0-4] vs. 6 days [IQR 5-7], p < 0.05). Patients who received a DOAC had a shorter hospital length of stay compared to patients who received warfarin (median 3 days [IQR 2-4] vs. 8 days [IQR 6-10], p < 0.05). This analysis showed that DOACs are being prescribed more than warfarin for treatment of new onset VTE. Renal and liver function may influence the agent prescribed. Utilization of DOACs may decrease the hospital length of stay.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Anticoagulants; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Transaminases; Venous Thromboembolism; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is a member of the novel target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOACs) family of drugs recently approved for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism events. A major drawback of the drug is its potential for causing severe hemorrhagic events, which may be difficult to treat in an emergency setting due to lack of effective antidote. Here, we describe a case of acute gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage leading to complete colon obstruction in a patient treated with rivaroxaban. Summary and Key Messages: The case presented here demonstrates a chain of events originating from an unprovoked intramural bleeding in a patient using rivaroxaban, leading to an organized giant clot formation, and to complete colon obstruction. In the available literature, the specific site of the GI bleeding has not been discussed. A further study is recommended and re-examination of bleeding events and exploration of new cases due to the use of TSOACs can help predict the course and the outcomes of such complications.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Colon; Diagnosis, Differential; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction; Male; Rivaroxaban

Eighty year old male patient with heart failure preserved ejection fraction (EF),\ Obstructive sleep apnea, peripherovascular disease admitted with increasing\ shortness of breath and found with pulmonary emboli. Baseline 2D-echocardiogram\ performed demonstrated preserved ejection fraction and a right\ thrombus in transit. Anticoagulation with weight based-low molecular\ weight heparin was given for six days. Follow-up echo performed demonstrated\ complete dissolution of right heart thrombi. Since there was complete dissolution\ of thrombi seen on right atrium, anticoagulation with Rivaroxaban was given instead.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Echocardiography; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Diseases; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Male; Pulmonary Embolism; Rivaroxaban; Thrombosis

A 64-year-old man suffered from acute carpal tunnel syndrome of his right hand without explainable reason. An emergency operation drained a pronounced haematoma. There is a strong suspicion this was a bleeding complication related to taking rivaroxaban (Xarelto(®)).

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban

Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage during rivaroxaban treatment have small hematoma and favorable outcomes compared with those with warfarin. We investigated its possible mechanism, focusing on prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2), a marker of thrombin generation.. In 65 patients with acute cardioembolic stroke (median 77years), rivaroxaban was initiated at 5days after the onset. Plasma F1+2 level (normal range, 69-229pmol/L), prothrombin time (PT), and rivaroxaban concentration evaluated by anti-Xa activity were serially measured.. Rivaroxaban retains a normal thrombin generation even at its peak level with prolonged PT, whereas warfarin at therapeutic levels inhibits thrombin generation. This may partly explain different outcomes in patients complicated with bleeding events.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Peptide Fragments; Prothrombin; Prothrombin Time; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is an oral, selective direct factor Xa inhibitor approved for several indications in patients at risk of thrombotic events. One limitation of its clinical use is the lack of data pertaining to its reversal in situations where urgent response is critical (e.g. acute bleeding events or emergency surgery).. This study assessed the effectiveness of a four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC; Beriplex(®)/Kcentra(®)) for the reversal of rivaroxaban-associated bleeding in an in vivo rabbit model, and evaluated the correlations between in vitro coagulation parameters and haemostasis in vivo.. Administration of single intravenous doses of rivaroxaban (150-450 μg/kg) resulted in increased and prolonged bleeding following standardised kidney incision. Pre-incision treatment with 4F-PCC (25-100 IU/kg) resulted in a dose-dependent reversal of rivaroxaban (150 and 300 μg/kg)-associated increases in time to haemostasis and blood loss; no reversal was seen at the highest rivaroxaban dose (450 μg/kg). Of the in vitro biomarkers tested, thrombin generation and whole-blood clotting time correlated well with in vivo measures of 4F-PCC-mediated effects. Thrombin generation was highly reagent-dependent, with the assay initiated using the phospholipid-only reagent being the most predictive of effective haemostasis in vivo.. In summary, in a rabbit model of acute bleeding, treatment with 4F-PCC reduced bleeding to control levels following rivaroxaban 150 μg/kg and 300 μg/kg administration.

Topics: Acute Disease; Animals; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Factors; Disease Models, Animal; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Rabbits; Rivaroxaban; Thrombin

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Guideline Adherence; Heparin; Humans; Morpholines; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Vitamin K

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Brain Ischemia; Humans; Male; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thrombolytic Therapy

Topics: Acute Disease; Age Factors; Ambulatory Care; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Comorbidity; Dabigatran; Disease Management; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Pulmonary Embolism; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thrombolytic Therapy; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Vena Cava Filters; Warfarin

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Male; Mesenteric Veins; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Portal Vein; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Drug Approval; Humans; Morpholines; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

The aim of the study was to make a preliminary assessment of the efficacy and safety of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prolonged treatment with new oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban. Materials and methods. It was a prospective observational study included patents with instrumentally verified DVT admitted to the Department of Vascular Surgery of the Clinical Hospital n.1 President's Administration of Russian Federation. All patients were administrated to the initial treatment with low-molecular weight heparins during first 24-48 hours followed by overlapped therapy with vitamin-K-antagonists. Patients who rejected a standard therapy were offered an alternative oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban: 15 mg bid during first 3 weeks followed by 20 mg qd. The duration of therapy varied from 3 to 12 month and more depend on localization and clinical provocation of the thrombosis. The dynamic control was performed on 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month. The endpoints of the study were recurrent DVT verified with duplex ultrasound or pulmonary embolism (PE) and hemorrhagic complications. In the study were enrolled 30 patients aged 27-87 years (mean age - 59.0±16.8), 13 men and 17 women who had from 0 to 6 individual risk factors (average - 2.4±1.6). In 33.3% cases DVT was clinically provoked and in 66.7% - unprovoked. Results. There were no recurrent DVT or PE observed. Cumulative rate of bleeding was 13.3% (95% CI: 1.2-25.5%): 6.65% (95% CI: 1.8-21.3%) - minor bleeding , that did not need drug withdrawal or extra visit to the doctor, and 6.65% (95% CI: 1.8-21.3%) - clinically significant bleeding, that needed an unscheduled visit to the doctor, the temporary interruption of the therapy or medical intervention. Major bleeding were not identified. Bleeding were presented as hematuria, petechial skin hemorrhages and epistaxis. Conclusion. The study demonstrates feasibility and safety of the new oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban application in the prolonged treatment of acute DVT.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Moscow; Prospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

To address common "what if" questions that arise relating to the long-term clinical follow-up and management of patients receiving the new oral anticoagulants (NOACs).. For this narrative review, we searched the PubMed database for recent (January 2008 to week 32 of 2013) clinical studies relating to NOAC use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. We used this evidence base to address prespecified questions relating to NOAC use in primary care settings.. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban should be taken with meals to decrease dyspepsia and increase absorption, respectively. There are no dietary restrictions with any of the NOACs, beyond moderating alcohol intake, and rivaroxaban and apixaban can be crushed if required. The use of acid suppressive therapies does not appear to affect the efficacy of the NOACs. As with warfarin, patients taking NOACs should avoid long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet drugs. For patients requiring surgery, generally NOACs should be stopped 2 to 5 days before the procedure, depending on bleeding risk, and the NOAC should usually be resumed at least 24 hours after surgery. Preoperative coagulation testing is generally unnecessary. In patients who develop bleeding, minor bleeding typically does not require laboratory testing or discontinuation of NOACs; with major bleeding, the focus should be on local measures to control the bleeding and supportive care, and coagulation testing should be performed. There are currently no antidotes to reverse NOACs. The NOACs should not be used in patients with valvular heart disease, prosthetic heart valves, cancer-associated deep vein thrombosis, or superficial thrombophlebitis.. Management of "what if" scenarios for patients taking NOACs have been proposed, but additional study is needed to address these issues, especially periprocedural management and bleeding.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Dabigatran; Family Practice; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Preoperative Care; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thiophenes; Time Factors; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Disease-Free Survival; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Neovascularization, Physiologic; Portal Vein; Recovery of Function; Regional Blood Flow; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pulmonary Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Enoxaparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Morpholines; Pulmonary Embolism; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thrombosis

Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Morpholines; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes; Venous Thrombosis