rivaroxaban and Activated-Protein-C-Resistance

We aimed to review the interfering effect of DOACs on tests for haemostatic function and then to discuss overcoming these with activated carbon (AC) products, thereby eliminating DOAC issues from test plasmas. Recent relevant articles were reviewed and are discussed. Laboratory tests for DOACs, lupus anticoagulant, factor assays and APC Resistance were carried out in such publications with and without an AC product on various instruments using reagents approved for diagnostic use in well-regulated clinical laboratories. All reports on this plasma pre-treatment by AC products agree that they extract DOACs from plasma samples with minimal effect on underlying clotting tests. The specific extraction of DOACs significantly reduced false positive lupus anticoagulant detection and provided more reliable results in clotting factor assays, APC resistance and other thrombophilia tests. Dabigatran and edoxaban seem to be adsorbed more thoroughly by AC from plasmas than rivaroxaban and apixaban. In summary, most of the AC products reviewed here appear to remove DOACs from test plasmas without significantly affecting underlying clotting tests and permit correct diagnosis of various haemostatic conditions despite the initial presence of DOACs. The application of such agents as a sample pre-treatment to overcome the effects of DOACs for routine coagulation testing is supported by the emerging literature.

Topics: Activated Protein C Resistance; Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation Tests; Charcoal; Humans; Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban

Background Investigation of hemostasis is problematic when patients are on anticoagulant therapy. Rivaroxaban especially causes substantial interference, extending many clot-based tests, thereby leading to false positive or negative events. In particular, rivaroxaban affects some assays for activated protein C resistance (APCR). Methods We assessed, in an international setting, cross laboratory (n = 31) testing using four samples to evaluate rivaroxaban induced interference in APCR testing, and whether this interference could be neutralised. The samples comprised: (A) pool of normal plasma (APCR-negative control); (B) this normal pool spiked with rivaroxaban (200 ng/mL) to create rivaroxaban-induced interference (potential 'false' positive APCR event sample); (C) the rivaroxaban sample subsequently treated with a commercial direct oral anticoagulant 'DOAC-neutraliser' (DOAC Stop), or (D) treated with andexanet alfa (200 μg/mL). Testing was performed blind to sample type. Results The rivaroxaban-spiked sample generated false positive APCR results for some, but unexpectedly not most APCR-tests. The sample treated with DOAC Stop evidenced a correction in the rivaroxaban-affected APCR assays, and did not otherwise adversely affect the rivaroxaban 'unaffected' APCR assays. The andexanet alfa-treated sample did not evidence correction of the false positive APCR, and instead unexpectedly exacerbated false positive APCR status with many tests. Conclusions DOAC Stop was able to neutralise any APCR interference induced by rivaroxaban. In contrast, andexanet alfa did not negate such interference, and instead unexpectedly created more false-positive APCR events.

Topics: Activated Protein C Resistance; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Activated Protein C Resistance; Anticoagulants; Blood Component Transfusion; Breast; Debridement; Factor V; Female; Glucocorticoids; Heparin; Humans; Mastectomy; Middle Aged; Plasma; Prednisone; Protein S Deficiency; Purpura Fulminans; Rivaroxaban; Thigh; Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous

- Rivaroxaban causes a false increase in activated protein C resistance (APCR) ratios and protein S activity.. - To investigate whether this increase masks a diagnosis of factor V Leiden (FVL) or protein S deficiency in a "real-world" population of patients undergoing rivaroxaban treatment and hypercoagulation testing.. - During a 2.5-year period, we compared 4 groups of patients (n = 60): FVL heterozygous (FVL-HET)/taking rivaroxaban, wild-type/taking rivaroxaban, FVL-HET/no rivaroxaban, and normal APCR/no rivaroxaban. Patients taking rivaroxaban were tested for protein S functional activity and free antigen (n = 32).. - The FVL-HET patients taking rivaroxaban had lower APCR ratios than wild-type patients ( P < .001). For FVL-HET patients taking rivaroxaban, mean APCR was 1.75 ± 0.12, versus 1.64 ± 0.3 in FVL-HET patients not taking rivaroxaban ( P = .005). Activated protein C resistance in FVL-HET patients fell more than 3 SDs below the cutoff of 2.2 at which the laboratory reflexes FVL DNA testing. No cases of FVL were missed despite rivaroxaban. In contrast, rivaroxaban falsely elevated functional protein S activity, regardless of the presence or absence of FVL ( P < .001). A total of 4 of 32 patients (12.5%) had low free protein S antigen (range, 58%-67%), whereas their functional protein S activity appeared normal (range 75%-130%). Rivaroxaban would have caused a missed diagnosis of all cases of protein S deficiency during the study if testing relied on the protein S activity assay alone.. - Despite rivaroxaban treatment, APCR testing can distinguish FVL-HET from normal patients, rendering indiscriminate FVL DNA testing of all patients on rivaroxaban unnecessary. Free protein S should be tested in patients taking rivaroxaban to exclude hereditary protein S deficiency.

Topics: Activated Protein C Resistance; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Coagulation Tests; Factor V; Factor Xa Inhibitors; False Negative Reactions; Female; Heterozygote; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Protein S; Protein S Deficiency; Rivaroxaban; Young Adult

Activated protein C resistance (APCr) leads to hypercoagulability and is due, often but not exclusively, to Factor V Leiden (FVL). The aim of this study was to assess the ex vivo and in vitro interference of the direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban (RIV) on a prothrombinase-based assay for APCr detection.. An ex vivo study was performed on fresh plasma samples obtained from 44 subjects with FV wild-type and seven with FVL heterozygous, all treated with RIV. An in vitro study was performed on 15 plasma samples (six from normal subjects, six from heterozygous, and three from homozygous FVL carriers, all frozen specimens) spiked with RIV. RIV concentration was evaluated using a chromogenic assay, and APCr was evaluated by a prothrombinase-based assay.. No significant interference of RIV on APCr results obtained by a prothrombinase-based assay was observed for drug concentrations up to 400 ng/mL in FV wild-type and FVL carriers (homozygous and heterozygous). These results were confirmed both ex vivo and in vitro.. RIV did not significantly interfere with the prothrombinase-based assay used for the assessment of APCr, and this was observed to occur independently of FV status. However, only concentrations up to 400 ng/mL were tested and, therefore, what occurs in the presence of higher doses remains to be investigated.

Topics: Activated Protein C Resistance; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Drug Monitoring; Factor V; Factor V Deficiency; Female; Heterozygote; Homozygote; Humans; Italy; Male; Rivaroxaban; Thromboplastin

: Activated protein C resistance (APC-R) is assessed as part of thrombophilia screening, preferably in patients not taking oral anticoagulants. Rivaroxaban is known to alter some APC-R assays. To our knowledge, there have been no reports on the effect of rivaroxaban on the Russell viper venom time (RVVT)-based APC-R assay in real-life patients. In 168 consecutive outpatients suspected of having venous thromboembolism because of thrombophilia, APC-R was determined using the RVVT-based ProC Ac R assay (Siemens, Marburg, Germany). Patients receiving rivaroxaban or vitamin K antagonists were eligible. We measured rivaroxaban concentrations using the anti-Xa Biophen DiXal assay (Hyphen Biomed, Neuville-Sur-Oise, France) and factor V Leiden using the real-time PCR. APC-R was detected in 23 (28%) patients on rivaroxaban (n = 81) administrated 2-48 h since the blood draw, 15 (28%) patients on vitamin K antagonists (n = 54), and in four (12%) patients off anticoagulation (n = 33). Compared with nonanticoagulated patients, APC-R ratios were similar in patients on rivaroxaban, without any correlation with rivaroxaban concentrations (from 0 to 303 μg/l). None of the patients on rivaroxaban were found to have false-negative or false-positive APC-R ratios. Rivaroxaban concentrations up to 300 μg/l do not affect results of the ProC Ac R RVVT-based assay, which could be recommended in patients referred to a clinic for thrombophilia screening in whom the time since the last dose of rivaroxaban is uncertain.

Topics: Activated Protein C Resistance; Adult; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prothrombin Time; Rivaroxaban; Thrombophilia; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

In 2010-2012, the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA) distributed 12 proficiency testing challenges to evaluate laboratory testing for protein S (PS). Results were analysed to assess the performance of PS activity, PS free antigen, and PS total antigen testing. Statistical analysis was performed on the numeric results and qualitative classification submitted for each method. There were 2,106 total results: 716 results from PS activity assays, 833 results from PS free antigen assays, and 557 results from PS total antigen assays. The three assay types performed well in the classification of five normal samples and nine abnormal samples, although certain PS activity methods were more likely to classify normal samples as abnormal and one PS total antigen assay was more likely to classify abnormal samples as normal. PS activity methods were affected by interfering substances such as heterozygous or homozygous factor V Leiden mutation (underestimation) and the anticoagulant drug rivaroxaban (overestimation). In conclusion, NASCOLA laboratories using a variety of PS assays performed well in the classification of clearly normal and abnormal samples. Laboratories performing PS activity assays should be aware of potential interferences in samples positive for FV Leiden or containing certain anticoagulant medications.

Topics: Activated Protein C Resistance; Blood Chemical Analysis; Factor V; Humans; Laboratories; North America; Protein S; Protein S Deficiency; Rivaroxaban

Topics: Activated Protein C Resistance; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antithrombins; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dabigatran; Factor V; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Heterozygote; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Rivaroxaban; Thromboplastin

Activated protein C resistance assays can detect factor V Leiden with high accuracy, depending on the method used. Factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban and direct thrombin inhibitors including dabigatran, argatroban, and bivalirudin can cause falsely normal results. Lupus anticoagulants can cause incorrect results in most current assays. Assays that include dilution into factor V-deficient plasma are needed to avoid interference from factor deficiencies or elevations, which can arise from a wide variety of conditions such as warfarin, liver dysfunction, or pregnancy. The pros and cons of the currently available assays are discussed.

Topics: Activated Protein C Resistance; Adult; Antithrombins; Arginine; Benzimidazoles; beta-Alanine; Biological Assay; Blood Coagulation Tests; Child; Dabigatran; Factor V; Factor Xa; False Positive Reactions; Female; Hirudins; Humans; Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor; Morpholines; Peptide Fragments; Pipecolic Acids; Pregnancy; Protein C; Recombinant Proteins; Rivaroxaban; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Warfarin

Rivaroxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor developed for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Laboratory monitoring is not necessary but the dose-dependent effects on common reagents and assay procedures are largely unknown.. To investigate the effect of rivaroxaban on commonly used coagulation assays.. Rivaroxaban was added to plasma from healthy subjects in the concentration range 0-1000 μg L(-1) and analyzed using different reagents for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), antithrombin, fibrinogen and activated protein C (APC) resistance assays.. At an expected peak concentration of rivaroxaban in clinical use, the APTTs were almost invariably prolonged but at lower concentrations the effect was weak. The concentration needed to double the APTT varied between 389 ± 106 and 617 ± 149 μg L(-1) for different reagents. The PT assays showed a marked degree of difference. In general, the Quick PT type assays were more sensitive compared with the Owren type PT assays. The results from antithrombin assays were dependent on the type of reagent, with the Xa-based assay being sensitive for rivaroxaban with an estimated increase of 0.09 IU mL(-1) per 100 μg L(-1) rivaroxaban. There were only minor effects on fibrinogen assays based on thrombin reagents. The APTT-based assay for APC resistance is affected in a dose-dependent manner whereas an assay based on the activation of coagulation at the prothrombinase level was unaffected.. Different assays, and even different reagents within an assay group, display variable effects by therapeutic concentrations of rivaroxaban.

Topics: Activated Protein C Resistance; Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Fibrinogen; Humans; Male; Morpholines; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Predictive Value of Tests; Prothrombin Time; Reproducibility of Results; Rivaroxaban; Thiophenes