ritonavir and Tuberculosis

Since the advent of combination antiretroviral therapy to successfully treat HIV infection, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) have become a significant problem as many antiretrovirals (ARVs) are metabolized in the liver. Antituberculous therapy traditionally includes rifamycins, particularly rifampicin. Rifabutin (RBT) has shown similar efficacy as rifampicin but induces CYP3A4 to a lesser degree and is less likely to have DDIs with ARVs. We identified 14 DDI pharmacokinetic studies on HIV monoinfected and HIV-tuberculosis coinfected individuals, and the remaining studies were healthy volunteer studies. Although RBT may be coadministered with most nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, identifying the optimal dose with ritonavir-boosted or cobicistat-boosted protease inhibitors is challenging because of concern about adverse effects with increased RBT exposure. Limited healthy volunteer studies on other ARV drug classes and RBT suggest that dose modification may be unnecessary. The paucity of data assessing clinical tuberculosis endpoints concurrently with RBT and ARV pharmacokinetics limits evidence-based recommendations on the optimal dose of RBT within available ARV drug classes.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Coinfection; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Rifabutin; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

Protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy may be used in resource-limited settings in persons with human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis (HIV-TB). Data on safety, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), and HIV-TB outcomes for lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) used with rifampin (RIF) or rifabutin (RBT) are limited.. We randomized adults with HIV-TB from July 2013 to February 2016 to arm A, LPV/r 400 mg/100 mg twice daily + RBT 150 mg/day; arm B, LPV/r 800 mg/200 mg twice daily + RIF 600 mg/day; or arm C, LPV/r 400 mg/100 mg twice daily + raltegravir (RAL) 400 mg twice daily + RBT 150 mg/day. All received two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and other TB drugs. PK visits occurred on day 12 ± 2. Within-arm HIV-TB outcomes were summarized using proportions and 95% CIs; PK were compared using Wilcoxon tests.. Among 71 participants, 52% were women; 72% Black; 46% Hispanic; median age, 37 years; median CD4+ count, 130 cells/mm3; median HIV-1 RNA, 4.6 log10 copies/mL; 46% had confirmed TB. LPV concentrations were similar across arms. Pooled LPV AUC12 (157 203 hours × ng/mL) and Ctrough (9876 ng/mL) were similar to historical controls; RBT AUC24 (7374 hours × ng/mL) and Ctrough (208 ng/mL) were higher, although 3 participants in arm C had RBT Cmax <250 ng/mL. Proportions with week 48 HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL were 58%, 67%, and 61%, respectively, in arms A, B, and C.. Double-dose LPV/r+RIF and LPV/r+RBT 150mg/day had acceptable safety, PK and TB outcomes; HIV suppression was suboptimal but unrelated to PK. Faster RBT clearance and low Cmax in 3 participants on RBT+RAL requires further study.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Rifabutin; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

Co-treatment of HIV and TB in young children is complicated by limited treatment options and complex drug-drug interactions. Rifabutin is an alternative to rifampicin for adults receiving a ritonavir-boosted PI. We aimed to evaluate the short-term safety and pharmacokinetics of rifabutin when given with lopinavir/ritonavir in children.. We conducted an open-label study of rifabutin dosed at 5 mg/kg three times a week in HIV-infected children≤5 years of age receiving lopinavir/ritonavir. Intensive steady-state pharmacokinetic sampling was conducted after six doses. The Division of AIDS 2004, clarification 2009, table for grading severity of adverse events was used to classify drug toxicities. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01259219.. Six children completed the study prior to closure by institutional review boards. The median (range) AUC0-48 of rifabutin was 6.91 (3.52-8.67) μg · h/mL, the median (range) Cmax of rifabutin was 0.39 (0.19-0.46) μg/mL, the median (range) AUC0-48 of 25-O-desacetyl rifabutin was 5.73 (2.85-9.13) μg · h/mL and the median (range) Cmax of 25-O-desacetyl rifabutin was 0.17 (0.08-0.32) μg/mL. The neutrophil count declined in all children; two children experienced grade 4 neutropenia, which resolved rapidly without complications. There was strong correlation between AUC0-48 measures and neutrophil counts.. Rifabutin dosed at 5 mg/kg three times per week resulted in lower AUC0-48, AUC0-24 and Cmax values for rifabutin and 25-O-desacetyl rifabutin compared with adults receiving 150 mg of rifabutin daily, the current recommended dose. We observed high rates of severe transient neutropenia, possibly due to immaturity of CYP3A4 in young children. It remains unclear whether a safe and effective rifabutin dose exists for treatment of TB in children receiving lopinavir/ritonavir.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antitubercular Agents; Area Under Curve; Child, Preschool; Coinfection; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis

Rifampicin and protease inhibitors are difficult to use concomitantly in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis because of drug-drug interactions. Rifabutin has been proposed as an alternative rifamycin, but there is concern that the current recommended dose is suboptimal. The principal aim of this study was to compare bioavailability of two doses of rifabutin (150 mg three times per week and 150 mg daily) in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis who initiated lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy in Vietnam. Concentrations of lopinavir/ritonavir were also measured.. This was a randomized, open-label, multi-dose, two-arm, cross-over trial, conducted in Vietnamese adults with HIV-associated tuberculosis in Ho Chi Minh City (Clinical trial registry number NCT00651066). Rifabutin pharmacokinetics were evaluated before and after the introduction of lopinavir/ritonavir -based antiretroviral therapy using patient randomization lists. Serial rifabutin and 25-O-desacetyl rifabutin concentrations were measured during a dose interval after 2 weeks of rifabutin 300 mg daily, after 3 weeks of rifabutin 150 mg daily with lopinavir/ritonavir and after 3 weeks of rifabutin 150 mg three times per week with lopinavir/ritonavir.. Sixteen and seventeen patients were respectively randomized to the two arms, and pharmacokinetic analysis carried out in 12 and 13 respectively. Rifabutin 150 mg daily with lopinavir/ritonavir was associated with a 32% mean increase in rifabutin average steady state concentration compared with rifabutin 300 mg alone. In contrast, the rifabutin average steady state concentration decreased by 44% when rifabutin was given at 150 mg three times per week with lopinavir/ritonavir. With both dosing regimens, 2 - 5 fold increases of the 25-O-desacetyl- rifabutin metabolite were observed when rifabutin was given with lopinavir/ritonavir compared with rifabutin alone. The different doses of rifabutin had no significant effect on lopinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations.. Based on these findings, rifabutin 150 mg daily may be preferred when co-administered with lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00651066.

Topics: Adult; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Area Under Curve; Asian People; Biological Availability; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis; Vietnam

Concomitant treatment of tuberculosis (TB) and HIV is recommended and improves outcomes. Bedaquiline is a novel drug for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB; combined use with antiretroviral drugs, nevirapine, or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) is anticipated, but no clinical data from coinfected patients are available. Plasma concentrations of bedaquiline and its M2 metabolite after single doses were obtained from interaction studies with nevirapine or LPV/r in healthy volunteers. The antiretrovirals' effects on bedaquiline and M2 pharmacokinetics were assessed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Potential dose adjustments were evaluated with simulations. No significant effects of nevirapine on bedaquiline pharmacokinetics were identified. LPV/r decreased bedaquiline and M2 clearances to 35% (relative standard error [RSE], 9.2%) and 58% (RSE, 8.4%), respectively, of those without comedication. As almost 3-fold (bedaquiline) and 2-fold (M2) increases in exposures during chronic treatment with LPV/r are expected, dose adjustments are suggested for evaluation. Efficacious, safe bedaquiline dosing for MDR-TB patients receiving antiretrovirals is important. Modeling results suggest that bedaquiline can be coadministered with nevirapine without dose adjustments. The predicted elevation of bedaquiline and M2 levels during LPV/r coadministration may be a safety concern, and careful monitoring is recommended. Further data are being collected in coinfected patients to determine whether dose adjustments are needed. (These studies have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration numbers NCT00828529 [study C110] and NCT00910806 [study C117].).

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Coinfection; Diarylquinolines; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis; Young Adult

Rifampicin profoundly reduces lopinavir concentrations. Doubled doses of lopinavir/ritonavir compensate for the effect of rifampicin in adults, but fail to provide adequate lopinavir concentrations in young children on rifampicin-based antituberculosis therapy. The objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model describing the pharmacokinetic differences of lopinavir and ritonavir, with and without rifampicin, between children and adults.. An integrated population pharmacokinetic model developed in nonmem 7 was used to describe the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir in 21 HIV infected adults, 39 HIV infected children and 35 HIV infected children with tuberculosis, who were established on lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy with and without rifampicin-containing antituberculosis therapy.. The bioavailability of lopinavir was reduced by 25% in adults whereas children on antituberculosis treatment experienced a 59% reduction, an effect that was moderated by the dose of ritonavir. Conversely, rifampicin increased oral clearance of both lopinavir and ritonavir to a lesser extent in children than in adults. Rifampicin therapy in administered doses increased CL of lopinavir by 58% in adults and 48% in children, and CL of ritonavir by 34% and 22% for adults and children, respectively. In children, the absorption half-life of lopinavir and the mean transit time of ritonavir were lengthened, compared with those in adults.. The model characterized important differences between adults and children in the effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir. As adult studies cannot reliably predict their magnitude in children, drug-drug interactions should be evaluated in paediatric patient populations.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Biological Availability; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Drug Interactions; Female; Half-Life; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Nonlinear Dynamics; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

Treatment of HIV/tuberculosis (TB) co-infected patients is complex due to drug-drug interactions for these chronic diseases. This study evaluates an intermittent dosing regimen for rifabutin when it is co-administered with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir.. A randomized, multiple-dose, parallel-group study was conducted in healthy subjects and these subjects received a daily dose of rifabutin 150 mg (n = 15, reference group) or a twice weekly dose with atazanavir 300 mg/ritonavir 100 mg once daily (n = 18, test group). Serial blood samples were collected at steady-state for pharmacokinetic analysis. Modelling and simulation techniques were utilized, integrating data across several healthy subject studies. This study is known as Study AI424-360 and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00646776.. The pharmacokinetic parameters (C(max), AUC(24avg) and C(min)) for rifabutin (149%, 48% and 40% increase, respectively) and 25-O-desacteyl rifabutin (6.77-, 9.90- and 10.45-fold increases, respectively) were both increased when rifabutin was co-administered with atazanavir/ritonavir than rifabutin 150 mg once daily alone. The study was stopped because subjects experienced more severe declines in neutrophil counts when rifabutin was given with atazanavir/ritonavir than alone. A post-hoc simulation analysis showed that when rifabutin 150 mg was given three times weekly with atazanavir/ritonavir, the average daily exposure of rifabutin was comparable to rifabutin 300 mg once daily, a dose necessary for reducing rifamycin resistance in HIV/TB co-infected patients.. The benefits to HIV/TB co-infected patients receiving rifabutin 150 mg three times weekly or every other day may outweigh the risks of neutropenia observed here in non-HIV-infected subjects, provided that patients on combination therapy will be closely monitored for safety and tolerability.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Area Under Curve; Atazanavir Sulfate; Biotransformation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Leukocyte Count; Male; Middle Aged; Neutrophils; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis; Young Adult

Rifampin is a key drug in antituberculosis chemotherapy because it rapidly kills the majority of bacilli in tuberculosis lesions, prevents relapse and thus enables 6-month short-course chemotherapy. Little is known about the pharmacokinetics of rifampin in children. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of rifampin in children with tuberculosis, both human immunodeficiency virus type-1-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected.. Fifty-four children, 21 human immunodeficiency virus-infected and 33 human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected, mean ages 3.73 and 4.05 years (P = 0.68), respectively, admitted to a tuberculosis hospital in Cape Town, South Africa with severe forms of tuberculosis were studied approximately 1 month and 4 months after commencing antituberculosis treatment. Blood specimens for analysis were drawn in the morning, 45 minutes, 1.5, 3.0, 4.0 and 6.0 hours after dosing. Rifampin concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. For two sample comparisons of means, the Welch version of the t-test was used; associations between variables were examined by Pearson correlation and by multiple linear regression.. The children received a mean rifampin dosage of 9.61 mg/kg (6.47 to 15.58) body weight at 1 month and 9.63 mg/kg (4.63 to 17.8) at 4 months after commencing treatment administered as part of a fixed-dose formulation designed for paediatric use. The mean rifampin area under the curve 0 to 6 hours after dosing was 14.9 and 18.1 microg/hour/ml (P = 0.25) 1 month after starting treatment in human immunodeficiency virus-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected children, respectively, and 16.52 and 17.94 microg/hour/ml (P = 0.59) after 4 months of treatment. The mean calculated 2-hour rifampin concentrations in these human immunodeficiency virus-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected children were 3.9 and 4.8 microg/ml (P = 0.20) at 1 month after the start of treatment and 4.0 and 4.6 microg/ml (P = 0.33) after 4 months of treatment. These values are considerably less than the suggested lower limit for 2-hour rifampin concentrations in adults of 8.0 microg/ml and even 4 microg/ml. Both human immunodeficiency virus-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected children with tuberculosis have very low rifampin serum concentrations after receiving standard rifampin dosages similar to those used in adults. Pharmacokinetic studies of higher dosages of rifampin are urgently needed in children to assist in placing the dosage of rifampin used in childhood on a more scientific foundation.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Benzoxazines; C-Reactive Protein; Child; Child, Preschool; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated tuberculosis is difficult to treat, given the propensity for drug interactions between the rifamycins and the antiretroviral drugs. We examined the pharmacokinetics of rifabutin before and after the addition of lopinavir-ritonavir.. We analyzed 10 patients with HIV infection and active tuberculosis in a state tuberculosis hospital. Plasma was collected for measurement of rifabutin, the microbiologically active 25-desacetyl-rifabutin, and lopinavir by validated high-performance liquid chromatography assays. Samples were collected 2-4 weeks after starting rifabutin at 300 mg thrice weekly without lopinavir-ritonavir, 2 weeks after the addition of lopinavir-ritonavir at 400 and 100 mg, respectively, twice daily to rifabutin at 150 mg thrice weekly, and (if rifabutin plasma concentrations were below the normal range) 2 weeks after an increase in rifabutin to 300 mg thrice weekly with lopinavir-ritonavir. Noncompartmental and population pharmacokinetic analyses (2-compartment open model) were performed.. Rifabutin at 300 mg without lopinavir-ritonavir produced a low maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) in 5 of 10 patients. After the addition of lopinavir-ritonavir to rifabutin at 150 mg, 9 of 10 had low C(max) values. Eight patients had dose increases to 300 mg of rifabutin with lopinavir-ritonavir. Most free rifabutin (unbound to plasma protein) C(max) values were below the tuberculosis minimal inhibitory concentration. For most patients, values for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve were as low or lower than those associated with treatment failure or relapse and with acquired rifamycin resistance in Tuberculosis Trials Consortium/US Public Health Service Study 23. One of the 10 patients experienced relapse with acquired rifamycin resistance.. The recommended rifabutin doses for use with lopinavir-ritonavir may be inadequate in many patients. Monitoring of plasma concentrations is recommended.

Topics: Adult; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Antiviral Agents; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

To assess the drug concentrations, efficacy and safety of concomitant use of rifampicin and regimens containing ritonavir/saquinavir (400mg/400mg twice daily) in tuberculosis-HIV treatment-naive patients.. This was an open-label, non-randomised, multiple-dose study. On study day (D)1, tuberculosis treatment (rifampicin 600mg/isoniazid 400mg per day fasting plus pyrazinamide 2 g/day) was introduced in 30 patients. On D31, highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) consisting of two nucleoside analogues plus ritonavir/saquinavir 400mg/400mg twice daily was initiated (n = 20). The pharmacokinetics were assayed with a validated reversed-phase HPLC method before the introduction of HAART on D30 (for rifampicin), after 30 days of HAART at D60 (for rifampicin plus ritonavir/saquinavir), and at the end of the study (without rifampicin) on D210 (for ritonavir/saquinavir). Clinical evaluations were performed on a monthly basis. CD4 counts and viral load were collected on D30, D60 and D180. Genotyping test for HIV was collected at baseline and at D180. Primary endpoints were drug concentration and viral load at D180 (<80 copies/mL). Secondary endpoints were presence of grade 3 and serious adverse events, clinical improvement, CD4 count and genotypic resistance to ritonavir/saquinavir.. Ten patients dropped out of the study during tuberculosis therapy alone. Mean (+/- SD) baseline CD4 count (on D30) was 151.89 (+/- 146.77) cells/mm(3) and viral load was 5.34 (+/- 0.4) log. During the antiretroviral therapy, 15 patients dropped out, 14 because of adverse events. One patient (of five) presented a viral load of <80 copies/mL at D180. All but one patient increased CD4 counts from baseline. No genotypic resistance was detected. Clinical improvement was evident in all five patients who tolerated the therapy. Serum concentrations of ritonavir/saquinavir and rifampicin remained within the therapeutic range.. Therapeutic concentrations of the studied drugs and reduction of viral load were achieved; adverse events are the main limitation of use of a ritonavir/saquinavir regimen in treatment-naive patients, but its clinical benefits were evident.

Topics: Adult; AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Area Under Curve; Bisexuality; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Half-Life; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Homosexuality; Humans; Karnofsky Performance Status; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis; Viral Load

To assess the efficacy and safety of a once-daily regimen with didanosine, lamivudine, saquinavir, and low-dose ritonavir in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients with tuberculosis treated with rifampin and the influence of rifampin on plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) of saquinavir.. Single-arm, prospective, multicenter, open-label pilot study, including 32 adult ARV-naive subjects with HIV infection and tuberculosis under standard treatment that included rifampin (600 mg q.d.) and isoniazid (300 mg q.d.). After 2 months of tuberculosis treatment, patients were started on once-daily ARV therapy, consisting of didanosine, lamivudine, ritonavir (200 mg), and saquinavir soft gel capsules (1600 mg). HIV RNA level, CD4 cell count, clinical and laboratory toxicity, and saquinavir Ctrough during and after antituberculosis therapy were analyzed.. After 48 weeks of follow-up, 20 of 32 patients (62.5%; 95% CI: 45.8% to 79.2%) in the intent-to-treat population and 20 of 28 (71.4%; 95% CI: 54.4% to 88.4%) in the on-treatment population had an HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL. Treatment tolerance was acceptable in all patients except for 2 with biologic hepatic toxicity leading to discontinuation. Seven patients had virologic failure. In 10 patients (36%), saquinavir Ctrough was <0.05 microg/mL during tuberculosis therapy and 5 of them had virologic failure. The median saquinavir Ctrough was 44% lower (interquartile range: 19% to 71%) with coadministration of rifampin than without.. The combination of didanosine, lamivudine, saquinavir, and ritonavir may be a useful treatment regimen for patients with tuberculosis in whom a once-daily protease inhibitor-containing regimen is considered indicated. Nevertheless, on the basis of pharmacokinetic profile the dose of 1600/200 mg of saquinavir/ritonavir cannot be recommended. Further studies with higher doses of saquinavir (2000 mg) boosted with ritonavir are warranted.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Didanosine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Pilot Projects; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Spain; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis

Lopinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations are profoundly reduced when co-administered with rifampicin. Super-boosting of lopinavir/ritonavir is limited by nonavailability of single-entity ritonavir, while double-dosing of co-formulated lopinavir/ritonavir given twice-daily produces suboptimal lopinavir concentrations in young children. We evaluated whether increased daily dosing with modified 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir 4:1 would maintain therapeutic plasma concentrations of lopinavir in children living with HIV receiving rifampicin-based antituberculosis treatment.. Children with HIV/tuberculosis coinfection weighing 3.0 to 19.9 kg, on rifampicin-based antituberculosis treatment were commenced or switched to 8-hourly liquid lopinavir/ritonavir 4:1 with increased daily dosing using weight-band dosing approach. A standard twice-daily dosing of lopinavir/ritonavir was resumed 2 weeks after completing antituberculosis treatment. Plasma sampling was conducted during and 4 weeks after completing antituberculosis treatment.. Of 20 children enrolled; 15, 1-7 years old, had pharmacokinetics sampling available for analysis. Lopinavir concentrations (median [range]) on 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir co-administered with rifampicin (n = 15; area under the curve 0-24 55.32 mg/h/L [0.30-398.7 mg/h/L]; C max 3.04 mg/L [0.03-18.6 mg/L]; C 8hr 0.90 mg/L [0.01-13.7 mg/L]) were lower than on standard dosing without rifampicin (n = 12; area under the curve 24 121.63 mg/h/L [2.56-487.3 mg/h/L]; C max 9.45 mg/L [0.39-26.4 mg/L]; C 12hr 3.03 mg/L [0.01-17.7 mg/L]). During and after rifampicin cotreatment, only 7 of 15 (44.7%) and 8 of 12 (66.7%) children, respectively, achieved targeted pre-dose lopinavir concentrations ≥1mg/L.. Modified 8-hourly dosing of lopinavir/ritonavir failed to achieve adequate lopinavir concentrations with concurrent antituberculosis treatment. The subtherapeutic lopinavir exposures on standard dosing after antituberculosis treatment are of concern and requires further evaluation.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

The current World Health Organization (WHO) pediatric tuberculosis dosing guidelines lead to suboptimal drug exposures. Identifying factors altering the exposure of these drugs in children is essential for dose optimization. Pediatric pharmacokinetic studies are usually small, leading to high variability and uncertainty in pharmacokinetic results between studies. We pooled data from large pharmacokinetic studies to identify key covariates influencing drug exposure to optimize tuberculosis dosing in children.. We used nonlinear mixed-effects modeling to characterize the pharmacokinetics of rifampicin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide, and investigated the association of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), antiretroviral therapy (ART), drug formulation, age, and body size with their pharmacokinetics. Data from 387 children from South Africa, Zambia, Malawi, and India were available for analysis; 47% were female and 39% living with HIV (95% on ART). Median (range) age was 2.2 (0.2 to 15.0) years and weight 10.9 (3.2 to 59.3) kg. Body size (allometry) was used to scale clearance and volume of distribution of all 3 drugs. Age affected the bioavailability of rifampicin and isoniazid; at birth, children had 48.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) [36.0%, 61.8%]; p < 0.001) and 64.5% (95% CI [52.1%, 78.9%]; p < 0.001) of adult rifampicin and isoniazid bioavailability, respectively, and reached full adult bioavailability after 2 years of age for both drugs. Age also affected the clearance of all drugs (maturation), children reached 50% adult drug clearing capacity at around 3 months after birth and neared full maturation around 3 years of age. While HIV per se did not affect the pharmacokinetics of first-line tuberculosis drugs, rifampicin clearance was 22% lower (95% CI [13%, 28%]; p < 0.001) and pyrazinamide clearance was 49% higher (95% CI [39%, 57%]; p < 0.001) in children on lopinavir/ritonavir; isoniazid bioavailability was reduced by 39% (95% CI [32%, 45%]; p < 0.001) when simultaneously coadministered with lopinavir/ritonavir and was 37% lower (95% CI [22%, 52%]; p < 0.001) in children on efavirenz. Simulations of 2010 WHO-recommended pediatric tuberculosis doses revealed that, compared to adult values, rifampicin exposures are lower in most children, except those younger than 3 months, who experience relatively higher exposure for all drugs, due to immature clearance. Increasing the rifampicin doses in children older than 3 months by 75 mg for children weighing <25 kg and 150 mg for children weighing >25 kg could improve rifampicin exposures. Our analysis was limited by the differences in availability of covariates among the pooled studies.. Children older than 3 months have lower rifampicin exposures than adults and increasing their dose by 75 or 150 mg could improve therapy. Altered exposures in children with HIV is most likely caused by concomitant ART and not HIV per se. The importance of the drug-drug interactions with lopinavir/ritonavir and efavirenz should be evaluated further and considered in future dosing guidance.. ClinicalTrials.gov registration numbers; NCT02348177, NCT01637558, ISRCTN63579542.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antitubercular Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Isoniazid; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrazinamide; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have gained in popularity in the last decade in both drug development and regulatory science. PBPK models differ from classical pharmacokinetic models in that they include specific compartments for tissues involved in exposure, toxicity, biotransformation, and clearance processes connected by blood flow. This study aimed to address the gaps between the mathematics and pharmacology framework observed in the literature. These gaps included nonconserved systems of equations and compartment concentration that were not biologically relatable to the tissues of interest. The resulting system of nonlinear differential equations is solved numerically with various methods for benchmarking and comparison. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis of all parameters were conducted to elucidate the critical parameters of the model. The resulting model was fit to clinical data as a performance benchmark. The clinical data captured the second line of antiretroviral treatment, lopinavir and ritonavir. The model and clinical data correlate well for coadministration of lopinavir/ritonavir with rifampin. Drug-drug interaction was captured between lopinavir and rifampin. This article provides conclusions about the suitability of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models for the prediction of drug-drug interaction and antiretroviral and anti-TB pharmacokinetics.

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Latent Tuberculosis; Lopinavir; Models, Biological; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

Prior to dolutegravir availability, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) was an alternative recommendation when first-line drugs could not be used. A high concentration of protease inhibitors was observed in the Thai people living with HIV (PLWH). Thus, dose reduction of LPV/r may be possible. However, the pharmacokinetics and dose optimization of LPV/r have never been investigated. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of LPV/r and provide dosage optimization in Thai PLWH.. LPV and RTV trough concentrations from Thai PLWH were combined with intensive data. The data were analyzed by the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. The influence of RTV concentration on LPV oral clearance (CL/F) was investigated.. Rifampicin (RIF) use increased LPV and RTV CL/F by 2.16-fold and 1.99-fold, respectively. The reduced dose of 300/75 and 200/150 mg twice daily provided a comparable percentage of patients achieving LPV target trough concentration to the standard dose for PI-naïve patients. For HIV/TB co-infected patients receiving RIF who could not tolerate the recommended dose, the reduced dose of 600/150 mg twice daily was recommended.. The population pharmacokinetic model was developed by integrating the interaction between LPV and RTV. The reduced LPV/r dosage offers sufficient LPV exposure for Thai PLWH.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Thailand; Tuberculosis

Treatment options are limited for TB/HIV-coinfected children who require PI-based ART. Rifabutin is the preferred rifamycin for adults on PIs, but the one study evaluating rifabutin with PIs among children was stopped early due to severe neutropenia.. We evaluated rifabutin safety and plasma pharmacokinetics among coinfected children 3-15 years of age receiving rifabutin 2.5 mg/kg daily with standard doses of lopinavir/ritonavir. The AUC0-24 at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after rifabutin initiation was described using intensive sampling and non-compartmental analysis. Clinical and laboratory toxicities were intensively monitored at 12 visits throughout the study.. Among 15 children with median (IQR) age 13.1 (10.9-14.0) years and weight 25.5 (22.3-30.5) kg, the median (IQR) rifabutin AUC0-24 was 5.21 (4.38-6.60) μg·h/mL. Four participants had AUC0-24 below 3.8 μg·h/mL (a target for the population average exposure) at week 2 and all had AUC0-24 higher than 3.8 μg·h/mL at the 4 and 8 week visits. Of 506 laboratory evaluations during rifabutin, grade 3 and grade 4 abnormalities occurred in 16 (3%) and 2 (0.4%) instances, respectively, involving 9 (60%) children. Specifically, grade 3 (n = 4) and grade 4 (n = 1) neutropenia resolved without treatment interruption or clinical sequelae in all patients. One child died at week 4 of HIV-related complications.. In children, rifabutin 2.5 mg/kg daily achieved AUC0-24 comparable to adults and favourable HIV and TB treatment outcomes were observed. Severe neutropenia was relatively uncommon and improved with ongoing rifabutin therapy. These data support the use of rifabutin for TB/HIV-coinfected children who require lopinavir/ritonavir.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Coinfection; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate is an injectable hormonal contraceptive, widely used by women of childbearing potential living with HIV and/or tuberculosis. As medroxyprogesterone acetate is a cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) substrate, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with antiretroviral or antituberculosis treatment may lead to subtherapeutic medroxyprogesterone acetate concentrations (< 0.1 ng/mL), resulting in contraception failure, when depot medroxyprogesterone is dosed at 12-week intervals. A pooled population pharmacokinetic analysis with 744 plasma medroxyprogesterone acetate concentrations from 138 women treated with depot medroxyprogesterone and antiretroviral/antituberculosis treatment across three clinical trials was performed. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to predict the percentage of participants with subtherapeutic medroxyprogesterone acetate concentrations and to derive alternative dosing strategies. Medroxyprogesterone acetate clearance increased by 24.7% with efavirenz coadministration. Efavirenz plus antituberculosis treatment (rifampicin + isoniazid) increased clearance by 52.4%. Conversely, lopinavir/ritonavir and nelfinavir decreased clearance (28.7% and 15.8%, respectively), but lopinavir/ritonavir also accelerated medroxyprogesterone acetate's appearance into the systemic circulation, thus shortening the terminal half-life. A higher risk of subtherapeutic medroxyprogesterone acetate concentrations at Week 12 was predicted on a typical 60-kg woman on efavirenz (4.99%) and efavirenz with antituberculosis treatment (6.08%) when compared with medroxyprogesterone acetate alone (2.91%). This risk increased in women with higher body weight. Simulations show that re-dosing every 8 to 10 weeks circumvents the risk of subtherapeutic medroxyprogesterone acetate exposure associated with these DDIs. Dosing depot medroxyprogesterone every 8 to 10 weeks should eliminate the risk of subtherapeutic medroxyprogesterone acetate exposure caused by coadministered efavirenz and/or antituberculosis treatment, thus reducing the risk of contraceptive failure.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Benzoxazines; Contraceptive Agents, Hormonal; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Cyclopropanes; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inducers; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Isoniazid; Lopinavir; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Nelfinavir; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

We aimed to determine how emerging evidence over the past decade informed how Ugandan HIV clinicians prescribed protease inhibitors (PIs) in HIV patients on rifampicin-based tuberculosis (TB) treatment and how this affected HIV treatment outcomes.. We reviewed clinical records of HIV patients aged 13 years and above, treated with rifampicin-based TB treatment while on PIs between1st-January -2013 and 30th-September-2018 from twelve public HIV clinics in Uganda. Appropriate PI prescription during rifampicin-based TB treatment was defined as; prescribing doubled dose lopinavir/ritonavir- (LPV/r 800/200 mg twice daily) and inappropriate PI prescription as prescribing standard dose LPV/r or atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r).. Of the 602 patients who were on both PIs and rifampicin, 103 patients (17.1% (95% CI: 14.3-20.34)) received an appropriate PI prescription. There were no significant differences in the two-year mortality (4.8 vs. 5.7%, P = 0.318), loss to follow up (23.8 vs. 18.9%, P = 0.318) and one-year post TB treatment virologic failure rates (31.6 vs. 30.7%, P = 0.471) between patients that had an appropriate PI prescription and those that did not. However, more patients on double dose LPV/r had missed anti-retroviral therapy (ART) days (35.9 vs 21%, P = 0.001).. We conclude that despite availability of clinical evidence, double dosing LPV/r in patients receiving rifampicin-based TB treatment is low in Uganda's public HIV clinics but this does not seem to affect patient survival and viral suppression.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Guidelines as Topic; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Lopinavir; Middle Aged; Protease Inhibitors; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis; Uganda; Young Adult

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antitubercular Agents; Antiviral Agents; Azithromycin; Betacoronavirus; Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Cohort Studies; Coinfection; Coronavirus Infections; COVID-19; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; COVID-19 Testing; Drug Combinations; Emigrants and Immigrants; Female; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Lopinavir; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Ritonavir; SARS-CoV-2; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Tuberculosis; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of 150 mg rifabutin (RBT) taken every other day (every 48 h) versus 300 mg RBT taken every other day (E.O.D), both in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), in adult patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) co-infection.. This is a two-arm, open-label, pharmacokinetic, randomised study conducted in Burkina Faso between May 2013 and December 2015. Enrolled patients were randomised to receive either 150 mg RBT EOD (arm A, 9 subjects) or 300 mg RBT EOD (arm B, 7 subjects), both associated with LPV/r taken twice daily. RBT plasma concentrations were evaluated after 2 weeks of combined HIV and TB treatment. Samples were collected just before drug ingestion and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h after drug ingestion to measure plasma drug concentration using an HPLC-MS/MS assay.. This study confirmed that the 150 mg dose of rifabutin ingested EOD in combination with LPV/r is inadequate and could lead to selection of rifamycin-resistant mycobacteria.. PACTR201310000629390, 28th October 2013.

Topics: Adult; AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Burkina Faso; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pilot Projects; Random Allocation; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Tuberculosis

To evaluate the proportion of children with lopinavir Cmin ≥1 mg/L when receiving a novel 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir dosing strategy during rifampicin co-treatment.. HIV-infected children on lopinavir/ritonavir and rifampicin were enrolled in a prospective pharmacokinetic study. Children were switched from standard-of-care lopinavir/ritonavir-4:1 with additional ritonavir (1:1 ratio) twice daily to 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir-4:1 using weight-banded dosing. Rifampicin was dosed at 10-20 mg/kg/day. After 2 weeks, plasma samples were collected ∼2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 h after the morning lopinavir/ritonavir-4:1 dose, ALT was obtained to assess safety and treatment was switched back to standard of care. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01637558.. We recruited 11 children in two weight bands: 5 (45%) were 10-13.9 kg and received 20-24 mg/kg/dose of lopinavir and 6 (55%) children weighed 6-9.9 kg and received 20-23 mg/kg/dose of lopinavir. The median age was 15 months (IQR = 12.6-28.8 months). The median (IQR) lopinavir Cmin was 3.0 (0.1-5.5) mg/L. Seven (63.6%) of the 11 children had Cmin values ≥1 mg/L. Children with a lopinavir mg/kg dose below the median 21.5 were more likely to have Cmin <1 mg/L (P = 0.02). There was a strong positive correlation between lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations. No associations were found between lopinavir AUC2-10 and age, sex, weight, nutritional status or mg/kg/dose of lopinavir.. These data do not support the use of 8-hourly lopinavir/ritonavir at studied doses. Evaluation of higher doses is needed to optimize treatment outcomes of TB and HIV in young children.

Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Anti-HIV Agents; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Lopinavir; Male; Plasma; Prospective Studies; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis

TB is the leading cause of death among HIV-infected children, yet treatment options for those who require PI-based ART are suboptimal. Rifabutin is the preferred rifamycin for adults on PI-based ART; only one study has evaluated its use among children on PIs and two of six children developed treatment-limiting neutropenia.. Since 2009, rifabutin has been available for HIV/TB-coinfected children requiring PI-based ART in the Harvard/APIN programme in Nigeria. We retrospectively analysed laboratory and clinical toxicities at baseline and during rifabutin therapy, and examined HIV/TB outcomes.. Between 2009 and 2015, 48 children received rifabutin-containing TB therapy with PI (lopinavir/ritonavir)-based ART: 50% were female with a median (IQR) baseline age of 1.7 (0.9-5.0) years and a median (IQR) CD4+ cell percentage of 15% (9%-25%); 52% were ART experienced. Eighty-five percent completed the 6 month rifabutin course with resolution of TB symptoms and 79% were retained in care at 12 months. Adverse events (grade 1-4) were more common at baseline (27%) than during rifabutin treatment (15%) (P = 0.006). Absolute neutrophil count was lower during rifabutin compared with baseline (median = 1762 versus 2976 cells/mm3, respectively), but only one instance (2%) of grade 3 neutropenia occurred during rifabutin treatment.. With clinical and laboratory monitoring, our data suggest that rifabutin is a safe option for TB therapy among children on PI-based ART. By contrast with the only other study of this combination in children, severe neutropenia was rare. Furthermore, outcomes from this cohort suggest that rifabutin is effective, and a novel option for children who require PI-based ART. Additional study of rifabutin plus PIs in children is urgently needed.

Topics: Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Biomarkers; Coinfection; Drug Interactions; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Retrospective Studies; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis

Paradoxical tuberculosis (TB)-associated Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS) is a common complication of combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) initiation in adults residing in resource-limited regions. Little is known about the burden and presentation of TB-IRIS in children initiating cART while receiving TB treatment.. Prospective cohort study of South African children initiating cART while on TB treatment. Children were assessed clinically and by chest x-ray before starting cART and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks post cART initiation. All children who presented with any signs or symptoms suggestive of paradoxical TB-IRIS were classified according to the consensus adult TB-IRIS case definition developed by the International Network for Study of HIV-associated IRIS (INSHI) and reviewed by an independent expert panel.. In 7 of the 104 children enrolled in the cohort, symptoms and/or clinical or radiological signs suggestive of paradoxical TB-IRIS developed after a median of 14 days of cART. In two of these cases, there was agreement between the INSHI case definition and the expert panel. In an additional 3 cases, the INSHI criteria were fulfilled but the expert panel made an alternative diagnosis of pneumonia (n = 2) and poor adherence to cART (n = 1).. The burden of paradoxical TB-IRIS in children with underlying TB initiating cART is low. Including response to antibiotic treatment for pneumonia as a criterion for an alternative diagnosis may improve the specificity of the INSHI case definition.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antitubercular Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Lopinavir; Male; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; South Africa; Tuberculosis; Tuberculosis, Lymph Node; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

Y R Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education, Chennai, India.. To compare anti-tuberculosis treatment outcomes in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) co-infection on atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) antiretroviral therapy (ART) plus daily rifabutin (RBT) 150 mg with those on ATV/r plus thrice-weekly RBT 150 mg.. A retrospective study was conducted of two HIV-TB co-infected cohorts between 2003 and 2014. Basic demographic and TB outcome data were obtained from an electronic database and patient records. The χ(2) and Fisher's exact test were used to compare daily and intermittent RBT treatment groups.. Of 292 individuals on an ATV/r-based ART regimen plus RBT, 118 (40.4%) received thrice-weekly RBT and 174 (59.6%) daily RBT. Patients in the two RBT treatment groups were similar in sex, age, previous history of TB, site of TB and acid-fast bacilli smear status. More individuals in the daily vs. the intermittent RBT group achieved clinical cure (73.0% vs. 44.1%, P < 0.001), with no significant differences in relapse/recurrence or all-cause mortality between groups.. There were higher rates of clinical TB cure in individuals on a boosted protease inhibitor-based ART regimen with daily RBT compared to intermittently dosed RBT. Optimal RBT dosing in this setting requires further investigation.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Atazanavir Sulfate; Child; Child, Preschool; Coinfection; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electronic Health Records; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; India; Infant; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis; Young Adult

Limited data are available from the developing world on antiretroviral drug resistance in HIV-1 infected children failing protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy, especially in the context of a high tuberculosis burden. We describe the proportion of children with drug resistance mutations after failed protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy as well as associated factors.. Data from children initiated on protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy with subsequent virological failure referred for genotypic drug resistance testing between 2008 and 2012 were retrospectively analysed. Frequencies of drug resistance mutations were determined and associations with these mutations identified through logistic regression analysis.. The study included 65 young children (median age 16.8 months [IQR 7.8; 23.3]) with mostly advanced clinical disease (88.5% WHO stage 3 or 4 disease), severe malnutrition (median weight-for-age Z-score -2.4 [IQR -3.7;-1.5]; median height-for-age Z-score -3.1 [IQR -4.3;-2.4]), high baseline HIV viral load (median 6.04 log10, IQR 5.34;6.47) and frequent tuberculosis co-infection (66%) at antiretroviral therapy initiation. Major protease inhibitor mutations were found in 49% of children and associated with low weight-for-age and height-for-age (p = 0.039; p = 0.05); longer duration of protease inhibitor regimens and virological failure (p = 0.001; p = 0.005); unsuppressed HIV viral load at 12 months of antiretroviral therapy (p = 0.001); tuberculosis treatment at antiretroviral therapy initiation (p = 0.048) and use of ritonavir as single protease inhibitor (p = 0.038). On multivariate analysis, cumulative months on protease inhibitor regimens and use of ritonavir as single protease inhibitor remained significant (p = 0.008; p = 0.033).. Major protease inhibitor resistance mutations were common in this study of HIV-1-infected children, with the timing of tuberculosis treatment and subsequent protease inhibitor dosing strategy proving to be important associated factors. There is an urgent need for safe, effective, and practicable HIV/tuberculosis co-treatment in young children and the optimal timing of treatment, optimal dosing of antiretroviral therapy, and alternative tuberculosis treatment strategies should be urgently addressed.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Coinfection; Drug Resistance, Viral; Gene Frequency; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Host-Pathogen Interactions; Humans; Infant; Logistic Models; Lopinavir; Malnutrition; Mutation; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Time Factors; Tuberculosis

South African HIV-infected infants below age 6 months and children younger than 3 years on concomitant antimycobacterial treatment received full-dose ritonavir single protease inhibitor (RTV-sPI), together with 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, from 2004 until 2008. Use of RTV-sPI has been described as a risk factor for PI drug resistance, but the extent of this resistance is unknown.. This research assesses clinical and virological outcome of a pediatric RTV-sPI cohort at a large South African antiretroviral therapy (ART) site in a high-burden tuberculosis setting, including resistance mutations in those failing ART.. All children initiated at Kalafong hospital before December 2008, who ever received RTV-sPI-based regimens, were assessed for patient outcome, virological failure and drug resistance. HIV viral loads were done 6-monthly and HIV genotyping since 2009.. There were 178 children who ever received RTV-sPI, with a mean age at ART initiation of 1.4 years. Of the 135 children (76%) with >6 months follow-up, 17 children (13%) never had viral suppression, whereas another 25 (18%) developed virological failure later. Nineteen of 26 children (73%) with genotypic resistance results had major PI mutations.. Treatment failure is not a universal feature in children with prior exposure to RTV-sPI regimens, but the significant proportion (31%) with virological failure is of concern due to high prevalence of major PI- and multiclass mutations. These children currently have no treatment options in the South African public sector, highlighting the urgent need for access to alternative ART regimens to ensure improved outcomes.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-HIV Agents; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Protease Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Failure; Tuberculosis

Patients with HIV are at an increased risk for cardiovascular disease, both as a result of treatment with protease inhibitors and from the disease itself. The medication regimens of patients with HIV and cardiovascular comorbidities are complex and require careful assessment for potentially serious drug-drug interactions. We report a case of clopidogrel non-responsiveness in a patient with HIV, latent tuberculosis and cardiovascular disease with a history of myocardial infarction. To our knowledge, this is the first report of significant drug interactions between clopidogrel, isoniazid and ritonavir. This case underscores the importance of a detailed drug interaction screening in infectious disease patients taking complex medication regimens, including clopidogrel.

Topics: Antitubercular Agents; Clopidogrel; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Isoniazid; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Ticlopidine; Tuberculosis

The optimal treatment for tuberculosis (TB) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients in resource-poor settings receiving lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) based second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) has yet to be determined. In South Africa, clinicians are advised to use 'double-dose' LPV/r dosed at 800 mg/200 mg twice daily during anti-tuberculosis treatment.. We conducted a retrospective study of HIV-infected patients who received ≥2 months of double-dose LPV/r-based ART during concomitant rifampicin-containing anti-tuberculosis treatment. We used standard definitions for TB and HIV outcomes; virological failure was defined as a viral load >1000 copies/ml. During co-administration, gastro-intestinal toxicity occurred in 9/25 (36%) patients, a symptomatic rise in aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase of any grade was noted in 3 (12%), with two Grade 3 events, and 3 (12%) patients required treatment discontinuation. Outcomes were favourable, with 20/25 (80%) patients achieving TB treatment success and virological failure observed among 3 (12%) patients during co-administration.. We found the use of double-dose LPV/r during simultaneous standard anti-tuberculosis treatment to be an effective and reasonably well tolerated interim strategy.

Topics: Adult; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Coinfection; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rifampin; Ritonavir; South Africa; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis; Viral Load; Young Adult

Rifabutin (RBT) is reported to be as effective as and to have less inducing effect on cytochrome P450 enzymes than rifampicin against tuberculosis (TB). The optimal dose of RBT during ritonavir (RTV) co-administration remains a matter of debate.. To study the pharmacokinetics of 150 mg RBT thrice weekly during concomitant atazanavir/RTV administration in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected TB patients.. This observational study was conducted in 16 adult HIV-infected TB patients being treated for TB with an RBT-containing regimen and an antiretroviral therapy regimen with RTV; the dose of RBT was 150 mg thrice weekly. Serial blood draws were performed at pre-dosing and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h after the drug was administered. Plasma RBT was estimated using high-performance liquid chromatography.. Peak RBT concentration was below the lower therapeutic limit (<0.3 μg/ml) in seven patients, while 10 patients had trough concentrations below the minimal inhibitory concentration against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (0.06 μg/ml), suggesting that the RBT dosage may be inadequate. Prospective studies in different settings are required to arrive at the proper therapeutic dose for RBT to be used during co-administration with RTV.

Topics: Adult; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Atazanavir Sulfate; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; India; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Oligopeptides; Polypharmacy; Pyridines; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

HIV/tuberculosis (HIV/TB)-coinfected patients intolerant/resistant to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) have limited treatment options. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK)/safety/efficacy of an adjusted dose of indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/r) 600/100 mg plus two NRTIs in HIV/TB-coinfected Thais receiving rifampicin-based anti-TB treatment. This was a prospective, open-label study. Eighteen Thai, HIV/TB-coinfected patients between 18 and 60 years were recruited. IDV/r 600 mg/100 mg plus lamivudine and stavudine were administered every 12 h (bid). When rifampicin was stopped, IDV/r was reduced to 400/100 mg BID. Clinical outcomes, adverse events, and concomitant drugs were intensively collected. Intensive 12-h PK was performed after 2 weeks of IDV/r while on rifampicin. Samples were collected: predosing and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h after drug intake. The median body weight was 55 kg. The median CD4 was 26 cells/μl. The median HIV RNA was 5.05 log(10) copies/ml. Then 15/18 underwent intensive PK at week 2. The median time between initiating rifampicin and IDV/r was 4.5 months. The median duration of rifampicin during study (rifampicin/IDV/r together) was 15.6 weeks. All received a total of 9 months of antituberculous drugs. The geometric means (GM) of indinavir AUC(0-12) and C(12) were 8.11 mg*h/liter and 0.03 mg/liter, respectively. After stopping rifampicin and reducing IDV/r to 400/100 bid, the GM indinavir C(12) increased to 0.68 mg/liter (p=0.004). In all, 8/18 (44%) had asymptomatic ALT elevation and 2/18 (11%) had symptomatic hepatotoxicity requiring IDV/r discontinuation. All 13 patients who remained on IDV/r treatment had HIV RNA <50 copies/ml at 48 weeks. Concomitant use of rifampicin and IDV/r resulted in subtherapeutic indinavir concentrations. Although 44% of them developed asymptomatic Grade 3/4 transaminitis, the rate of study drug discontinuation due to hepatotoxicity was low. Despite good virological outcome in our cohort, prolonged exposure to subtherapeutic indinavir concentrations may lead to treatment failure.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Coinfection; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Rifampin; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Thailand; Treatment Failure; Tuberculosis; Viral Load

Rifampicin co-administration dramatically reduces plasma lopinavir concentrations. Studies in healthy volunteers and HIV-infected patients showed that doubling the dose of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or adding additional ritonavir offsets this interaction. However, high rates of hepatotoxicity were observed in healthy volunteers. We evaluated the safety, effectiveness and pre-dose concentrations of adjusted doses of LPV/r in HIV infected adults treated with rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment.. Adult patients on a LPV/r-based antiretroviral regimen and rifampicin-based tuberculosis therapy were enrolled. Doubled doses of LPV/r or an additional 300 mg of ritonavir were used to overcome the inducing effect of rifampicin. Steady-state lopinavir pre-dose concentrations were evaluated every second month.. 18 patients were enrolled with a total of 79 patient months of observation. 11/18 patients were followed up until tuberculosis treatment completion. During tuberculosis treatment, the median (IQR) pre-dose lopinavir concentration was 6.8 (1.1-9.2) mg/L and 36/47 (77%) were above the recommended trough concentration of 1 mg/L. Treatment was generally well tolerated with no grade 3 or 4 toxicity: 8 patients developed grade 1 or 2 transaminase elevation, 1 patient defaulted additional ritonavir due to nausea and 1 patient developed diarrhea requiring dose reduction. Viral loads after tuberculosis treatment were available for 11 patients and 10 were undetectable.. Once established on treatment, adjusted doses of LPV/r co-administered with rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment were tolerated and LPV pre-dose concentrations were adequate.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Coinfection; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in HIV-infected patients during rifabutin-based anti-mycobacterial therapy.. A longitudinal, cross-over pharmacokinetic evaluation of lopinavir with and without rifabutin in HIV-infected subjects with mycobacterial disease was done. All received lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg twice a day) + an adjusted rifabutin dose of 150 mg every other day. Twelve-hour lopinavir pharmacokinetic sampling occurred at 2 weeks (T1) and 6 weeks (T2) after starting combined therapy and 10 weeks after completion of adjusted rifabutin (T3). Plasma was assayed using an HPLC method; lopinavir plasma concentration-time data were analysed using non-compartmental methods.. In 10 patients with complete lopinavir curves at T1, T2 and T3 pharmacokinetic values were, respectively: AUC(0-12), 187.5, 161.8 and 121.1 μg · h/mL; C(trough), 13.2, 10.0 and 7.7 μg/mL; C(max), 18.7, 15.9 and 13.3 μg/mL; and apparent oral clearance (CL/F), 0.035, 0.037 and 0.045 L/h/kg. Lopinavir C(trough) and AUC(0-12) were significantly higher at T1 compared with T3 while CL/F remained unchanged throughout. Combined treatment was well tolerated and none of the patients experienced moderate to severe lopinavir-related adverse events.. Lopinavir serum concentrations are not reduced when the drug is administered together with an adjusted dose of 150 mg of rifabutin every other day.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Plasma; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

In HIV-infected patients receiving rifampicin-based treatment for tuberculosis (TB), the dosage of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is adjusted to prevent sub-therapeutic lopinavir concentrations. In this setting, South African clinicians were advised to administer super-boosted LPV/r (400 mg/400 mg) twice daily, instead of standard dosed LPV/r (400 mg/100 mg) twice daily. We sought to determine--in routine practice--the tolerability and HIV treatment outcomes associated with super-boosted LPV/r compared to unadjusted LPV/r in combination with rifampicin-based TB treatment.. We conducted a retrospective review of HIV-infected patients who receiving second-line ART with a LPV/r-containing regimen who required concomitant TB treatment. We identified 29 patients; the median age was 36 years (IQR 29-40), 22 (76%) were female, the median CD4 cell count and viral load at first-line ART failure was 86 cells/mm³ (IQR 21-159) and 39,457 copies/mL (IQR 6,025-157,500), respectively. According to physician preference, 15 (52%) of 29 patients received super-boosted LPV/r (400 mg/400 mg) every 12 hours during TB treatment and 14 (48%) of 29 patients received standard dose LPV/r (400 mg/100 mg) twice daily during TB treatment. Among patients who received super-boosted LPV/r there was a trend towards a higher rate of symptomatic transaminitis (27% vs. 7%; p = 0.3), gastrointestinal toxicity (20% vs. 0%; p = 0.2) and a significantly increased need for treatment discontinuation (47% vs. 7%; p = 0.035. The durability of coadministered treatment was significantly shorter in patients who received super-boosted lopinavir/ritonavir with TB treatment compared to patients who received standard lopinavir/ritonavir dosing (log rank, P = 0.036). The rate of virologic failure was not higher in patients with unadjusted LPV/r dosing.. We observed a high rate of toxicity and need for treatment discontinuation among patients on standard rifampicin-based TB treatment who received super-boosted LPV/r.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Child; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Rifampin; Ritonavir; South Africa; Time Factors; Tuberculosis; Young Adult

Mycobacterial excretory secretory-31 (SEVA TB ES-31) antigen is shown to possess protease and lipase activities.. To study the effect of commonly used HIV-protease inhibitors and lipase inhibitor Orlistat if any on mycobacterial ES-31 serine protease in vitro enzyme activity and on the growth of M.tb H37Ra bacilli in axenic culture.. Effect of HIV-protease inhibitors namely Ritonavir, Lopinavir and Indinavir and Orlistat on protease activity of ES-31 was assessed using azocasein assay and on bacillary growth in axenic culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra. The concentration of ES-31 antigen in culture filtrate was determined by sandwich peroxidase ELISA using anti ES-31 antibody and the growth of bacilli by CFU count.. HIV-protease inhibitors such as Ritonavir, Lopinavir and Indinavir and lipase inhibitor Orlistat inhibited serine protease activity by 41.3 - 69.7% in vitro. These inhibitors also showed decreased bacterial growth in axenic culture and further confirmed by decreased concentration of ES-31 serine protease secretion in the culture fluid. Ritonavir showed maximum inhibition of 77% on the growth of the bacilli in axenic culture while anti obesity drug Orlistat showed 61% inhibition.. SEVA TB ES-31 with serine protease and lipase activities may be a potential drug target in tuberculosis management.

Topics: Antigens, Bacterial; Bacterial Proteins; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lactones; Lopinavir; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Orlistat; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Serine Endopeptidases; Tuberculosis

Coadministration of rifampicin dramatically reduces the concentrations of protease inhibitors. A pharmacokinetic study in healthy adults showed that doubling the dose of coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir was able to overcome the inducing effect of rifampicin. We evaluated this strategy in children treated with rifampicin-based antituberculosis therapy attending antiretroviral clinics in South Africa.. Plasma concentrations of lopinavir were measured in children (aged 0.64-2.43 years) established on antituberculosis treatment who commenced antiretroviral therapy comprising double the usual recommended dose of lopinavir/ritonavir oral solution (460/115 mg/m(2) twice daily) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Control children (0.57-4.23 years old) without tuberculosis received standard doses of lopinavir/ritonavir (230/57.5 mg/m(2) twice daily).. Pre-dose lopinavir concentrations were reduced by >80% in children with tuberculosis (median 0.7 mg/l, IQR 0.1-2.0) compared with controls (4.2 mg/l, IQR 3.4-8.1; P<0.001) and were below the minimum recommended concentration of 1 mg/l in 12 of 20 (60%) children with tuberculosis versus 2 of 24 (8%) controls (P<0.001).. Double doses of coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir results in inadequate lopinavir concentrations in young children treated concurrently with rifampicin. Suitable regimens are urgently needed for treating young children with HIV-associated tuberculosis.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Child, Preschool; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Rifampin; Ritonavir; South Africa; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis

Rifamycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (i.e., by a strain of M. tuberculosis that is only resistant to rifamycins) occurs disproportionately among patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who have a low CD4 cell count. We observed 3 genetically confirmed cases of relapse with rifamycin-resistant M. tuberculosis infection following concurrent treatment with rifabutin (dosage, 150 mg every other day) and a ritonavir-boosted HIV protease inhibitor during a prior episode of drug-susceptible tuberculosis. Higher doses of rifabutin and a ritonavir-boosted HIV protease inhibitor as treatment for tuberculosis should be studied further.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antitubercular Agents; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Recurrence; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Serum; Tuberculosis; Young Adult

Rifampicin dramatically reduces plasma lopinavir concentrations (coformulated with ritonavir in a 4:1 ratio). A study in healthy adult volunteers showed that this reduction could be ameliorated if additional ritonavir is given. We evaluated the effect of additional ritonavir on plasma lopinavir concentrations in HIV-infected children receiving rifampicin-based treatment for tuberculosis.. We measured plasma lopinavir concentrations in 2 parallel groups receiving combination antiretroviral therapy that included lopinavir-ritonavir, with and without rifampicin-based antitubercular treatment. Additional ritonavir was given (lopinavir/ritonavir ratio of 1:1) during antitubercular treatment. Lopinavir concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.. There were 15 children (aged 7 months to 3.9 years) in each group. Lopinavir pharmacokinetic measures (median [interquartile range]) for children with and without rifampicin, respectively, were maximum concentration (Cmax) of 10.5 [7.1 to 14.3] versus 14.2 [11.9 to 23.5] mg/L (P = 0.018), area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC0-12) of 80.9 [50.9 to 121.7] versus 117.8 [80.4 to 176.1] mg/h/L (P = 0.036), and trough concentration (Cmin) of 3.94 [2.26 to 7.66] versus 4.64 [2.32 to 10.40] mg/L (P = 0.468). Thirteen of 15 children receiving antitubercular treatment (87%) had a lopinavir Cmin greater than the recommended minimum therapeutic concentration (1 mg/L).. The effect of rifampicin-based antitubercular treatment on lopinavir concentrations was attenuated by adding ritonavir to rifampicin. Although the median Cmax and AUC0-12 were lowered by 26% and 31%. respectively, the Cmin was greater than the minimum recommended concentration in most children.

Topics: Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Child, Preschool; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

To assess plasma steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of rifampicin, isoniazid, saquinavir and ritonavir in HIV and tuberculosis (TB) co-infected patients, and investigate potential interactions between TB drugs and protease inhibitors (PIs).. Open-label, single-arm, sequential PK study including 22 patients with HIV infection and TB. During the first 2 months, patients received rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide, with or without ethambutol (first PK study, n = 22). Then patients stopped pyrazinamide and ethambutol and started once-daily antiretroviral therapy (ART) with didanosine, lamivudine, ritonavir (200 mg) and saquinavir (1600 mg) (second PK study, n = 18). Patients stopped all TB drugs after 9 months continuing the same ART (third PK study, n = 15). Differences between TB drug parameters in the first and second PK studies, and between PI parameters in the second and third PK studies were used to assess interactions.. Rifampicin and isoniazid pharmacokinetics did not change substantially with saquinavir and ritonavir. A significant 39.5%, 34.9% and 48.7% reduction in median saquinavir AUC(0-24), C(max) and C(trough), respectively, was seen with rifampicin and isoniazid. Ritonavir AUC(0-24), C(max) and C(trough) decreased 42.5%, 49.6% and 64.3%, respectively, with rifampicin and isoniazid.. There was a significant interaction between saquinavir, ritonavir and rifampicin, with reduction in median plasma concentrations of saquinavir and ritonavir. Saquinavir should be given with caution in patients receiving rifampicin. Twice-daily dosing or higher saquinavir doses in once-daily administration should be tested to obtain more appropriate plasma levels.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Area Under Curve; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Models, Statistical; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) is a common opportunistic infection among HIV-infected people, and rifampicin is an important drug for the treatment of TB. However, administration of rifampicin in combination with antiretroviral therapy, particularly protease inhibitors, is difficult because of drug-drug interactions.. We have performed a prospective study in three HIV-infected patients with TB treated with a rifampicin-containing regimen (rifampicin 600 mg per day) and antiretroviral therapy including only nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus atazanavir 300 mg once a day (qd) and ritonavir 100 mg qd, to evaluate whether the inducing effect of rifampicin on the drug-metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 could be overcome by the inhibitory effect of ritonavir. A complete pharmacokinetic evaluation of the steady-state concentrations of atazanavir and ritonavir was performed.. In all three cases, more than 50% of the time the atazanavir level was below the minimum recommended trough plasma level (150 ng/mL according to current pharmacokinetic guidelines) to inhibit HIV wild-type replication.. These results strongly indicate that the administration of rifampicin with a combination of atazanavir 300 mg qd plus ritonavir 100 mg qd must be avoided because subtherapeutic concentrations of atazanavir are produced.

Topics: Adult; AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Area Under Curve; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

We report on a Subsaharian patient with HIV infection and disseminated tuberculosis who developed acute, severe hypersensitivity reaction to efavirenz including acute renal failure in addition to liver and lung involvement, in the absence of skin changes or blood eosinophilia.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Hypersensitivity; Ghana; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Organophosphonates; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Tuberculosis

Topics: AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Developing Countries; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Tuberculosis

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Rifampin; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis

Topics: Adult; AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Consumer Product Safety; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pilot Projects; Pyrazinamide; Rifampin; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tuberculosis; Viral Load

A 30-year-old man with a known HIV infection for 7 years presented for treatment with antiretroviral drugs. He was known to have had herpes zoster, oral hairy leukoplakia and recurrent Candida stomatitis, but was otherwise without symptoms.. The CD4 lymphocyte count was 19 cells/mm3 and there were 41,000 HIV-RNA copies/ml.. The HIV infection was in CDC stage B3, indicating the need for combined antiretroviral treatment. A week after starting stavudine, saquinavir and ritonavir he had to be admitted because of nausea and vomiting, colicky abdominal pain, diarrhea, fever up to 39 degrees C and a rise of C-reactive protein to 207 mg/dl. Bacteriological examination of feces and biopsy of an enlarged retroperitoneal lymph node revealed atypical mycobacteria. Antituberculosis treatment was started. The CD4 cell count rose to 56/mm3 and the viral count fell to 11,000/ml. Each time after initiating a different antiviral regimen the symptoms recurred.. This case illustrates an atypical manifestation of on opportunistic infection: during combined antiviral treatment the CD4 cell count rose and thus precipitated an heretofore subclinical mycobacterial infection with focal lymphadenitis. If, on starting antiretroviral treatment at a late HIV stage, new symptoms develop within 1-3 weeks, one should consider drug-induced side effects or the onset of an opportunistic infection that has become manifest as the result of an improved immunological state.

Topics: Adult; AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug Therapy, Combination; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lymphadenitis; Male; Mesenteric Lymphadenitis; Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Time Factors; Tuberculosis

Topics: Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Tuberculosis