ritonavir and Malaria

Treating malaria in HIV-coinfected individuals should consider potential drug-drug interactions. Artemether-lumefantrine is the most widely recommended treatment for uncomplicated malaria globally. Lumefantrine is metabolized by CYP3A4, an enzyme that commonly used antiretrovirals often induce or inhibit. A population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis was conducted using individual participant data from 10 studies with 6,100 lumefantrine concentrations from 793 nonpregnant adult participants (41% HIV-malaria-coinfected, 36% malaria-infected, 20% HIV-infected, and 3% healthy volunteers). Lumefantrine exposure increased 3.4-fold with coadministration of lopinavir-ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART), while it decreased by 47% with efavirenz-based ART and by 59% in the patients with rifampin-based antituberculosis treatment. Nevirapine- or dolutegravir-based ART and malaria or HIV infection were not associated with significant effects. Monte Carlo simulations showed that those on concomitant efavirenz or rifampin have 49% and 80% probability of day 7 concentrations <200 ng/ml, respectively, a threshold associated with an increased risk of treatment failure. The risk of achieving subtherapeutic concentrations increases with larger body weight. An extended 5-day and 6-day artemether-lumefantrine regimen is predicted to overcome these drug-drug interactions with efavirenz and rifampin, respectively.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antimalarials; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination; Body Weight; Computer Simulation; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Lumefantrine; Malaria; Male; Middle Aged; Monte Carlo Method; Ritonavir; Young Adult

Combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) is now the global standard for HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women at all CD4⁺ cell counts. We compared the efficacy and safety of an efavirenz versus lopinavir/ritonavir regimen for HIV-infected pregnant women initiating ART in rural Uganda.. Randomized clinical trial.. We performed a planned secondary analysis comparing viral load suppression (HIV-1 RNA ≤400 copies/ml), safety, and HIV transmission to infants in a trial designed to test the hypothesis that lopinavir/ritonavir versus efavirenz-based ART would reduce placental malaria (PROMOTE, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00993031). HIV-infected, ART-naive pregnant women at 12-28 weeks gestation and any CD4⁺ cell count were randomized. ART was provided and participants were counseled to breastfeed for 1 year postpartum.. The median age of the 389 study participants was 29 years; median CD4⁺ cell count was 370 cells/μl. At delivery, virologic suppression was 97.6% in the efavirenz arm and 86.0% in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm (P < 0.001). At 48 weeks postpartum, 91.0% of women on efavirenz and 88.4% on lopinavir/ritonavir had viral suppression (P = 0.49). Grade 1 or 2 gastrointestinal adverse events were higher among women on lopinavir/ritonavir versus efavirenz. Only two infants acquired HIV (both in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm), and HIV-free infant survival was similar between study arms: 92.9% (lopinavir/ritonavir) versus 97.2% (efavirenz) (P = 0.10).. Virologic suppression at delivery was higher with an efavirenz versus lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen. However, women in both arms achieved high levels of virologic suppression through 1 year postpartum and the risk of transmission to infants was low.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Breast Feeding; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lopinavir; Malaria; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Ritonavir; Uganda; Viral Load

In the Prevention of Malaria and HIV disease in Tororo pediatrics trial, HIV-infected Ugandan children randomized to receive lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) experienced a lower incidence of malaria compared with children receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based ART. Here we present the results of the noninferiority analysis of virologic efficacy and comparison of immunologic outcomes.. ART-naive or -experienced (HIV RNA <400 copies/mL) children aged 2 months to 6 years received either LPV/r or NNRTI-based ART. The proportion of children with virologic suppression (HIV RNA <400 copies/mL) at 48 weeks was compared using a prespecified noninferiority margin of -11% in per-protocol analysis. Time to virologic failure by 96 weeks, change in CD4 counts and percentages, and incidence of adverse event rates were also compared.. Of 185 children enrolled, 91 initiated LPV/r and 92 initiated NNRTI-based ART. At baseline, the median age was 3.1 years (range, 0.4-5.9), and 131 (71%) children were ART-naive. The proportion of children with virologic suppression at 48 weeks was 80% (67/84) in the LPV/r arm vs. 76% (59/78) in the NNRTI arm, a difference of 4% (95% confidence interval: -9% to +17%). Time to virologic failure, CD4 changes, and the incidence of Division of AIDS grade III/IV adverse events were similar between arms.. LPV/r-based ART was not associated with worse virologic efficacy, immunologic efficacy, or adverse event rates compared with NNRTI-based ART. Considering these results and the reduction in malaria incidence associated with LPV/r previously reported for this trial, wider use of LPV/r to treat HIV-infected African children in similar malaria-endemic settings could be considered.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child, Preschool; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Malaria; Male; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Uganda; Viral Load

Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are highly efficacious and safe, but data from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children concurrently receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) and ACTs are limited.. We evaluated 28-day outcomes following malaria treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL) or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) in 2 cohorts of HIV-infected Ugandan children taking various ART regimens. In one cohort, children <6 years of age were randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based ART and treated with AL for uncomplicated malaria. In another cohort, children <12 months of age were started on nevirapine-based ART if they were eligible, and randomized to AL or DP for the treatment of their first and all subsequent uncomplicated malaria episodes.. There were 773 and 165 treatments for malaria with AL and DP, respectively. Initial response to therapy was excellent, with 99% clearance of parasites and <1% risk of repeat therapy within 3 days. Recurrent parasitemia within 28 days was common following AL treatment. The risk of recurrent parasitemia was significantly lower among children taking LPV/r-based ART compared with children taking nevirapine-based ART following AL treatment (15.3% vs 35.5%, P = .009), and those treated with DP compared with AL (8.6% vs 36.2%, P < .001). Both ACT regimens were safe and well tolerated.. Treatment of uncomplicated malaria with AL or DP was efficacious and safe in HIV-infected children taking ART. However, there was a high risk of recurrent parasitemia following AL treatment, which was significantly lower in children taking LPV/r-based ART compared with nevirapine-based ART.

Topics: Antimalarials; Artemisinins; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Malaria; Male; Nevirapine; Parasitemia; Quinolines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Uganda

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women are at increased risk of malaria and its complications. In vitro and in vivo data suggest that the HIV protease inhibitors lopinavir/ritonavir may have potent antimalarial activity. We sought to evaluate whether lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduced the risk of placental malaria.. HIV-infected, ART-naive pregnant women were enrolled between gestational weeks 12 and 28 and randomly assigned to receive lopinavir/ritonavir-based or efavirenz-based ART. Women received daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis and insecticide-treated bed nets at enrollment and were followed up to 1 year after delivery. The primary outcome was placental malaria, defined by the detection of malaria parasites, using microscopy or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of placental blood specimens. Secondary outcomes included placental malaria, defined by histopathologic results; adverse birth outcomes; incidence of malaria; and prevalence of asymptomatic parasitemia. Analyses were done using an intention-to-treat approach.. Of 389 subjects randomly assigned to a treatment group, 377 were followed through to delivery. There was no significant difference in the risk of placental malaria, as defined by thick smear or PCR findings, between the lopinavir/ritonavir-based and efavirenz-based ART arms (7.4% vs 9.8%; P = .45). Similarly, there were no differences in secondary outcomes between the 2 treatment arms.. Lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART did not reduce the risk of placental or maternal malaria or improve birth outcomes, compared with efavirenz-based ART.. NCT00993031.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antimalarials; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lopinavir; Malaria; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Young Adult

Etravirine is a substrate and inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and a substrate and inhibitor of CYP2C9 and CYPC2C19. Darunavir/ritonavir is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A. Artemether and lumefantrine are primarily metabolized by CYP3A; artemether is also metabolized to a lesser extent by CYP2B6, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Artemether has an active metabolite, dihydroartemisinin. The objective was to investigate pharmacokinetic interactions between darunavir/ritonavir or etravirine and arthemether/lumefrantrine.. This single-centre, randomized, two-way, two-period cross-over study included 33 healthy volunteers. In panel 1, 17 healthy volunteers received two treatments (A and B) in random order, with a washout period of 4 weeks between treatments: treatment A: artemether/lumefantrine 80/480 mg alone, in a 3-day course; treatment B: etravirine 200 mg twice a day (bid) for 21 days with artemether/lumefantrine 80/480 mg from day 8 (a 3-day treatment course). In panel 2, another 16 healthy volunteers received two treatments, similar to those in panel 1 but instead of etravirine, darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid was given.. Overall, 28 of the 33 volunteers completed the study. Co-administration of etravirine reduced the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of artemether [by 38%; 90% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.80], dihydroartemisinin (by 15%; 90% CI 0.75-0.97) and lumefantrine (by 13%; 90% CI 0.77-0.98) at steady state. Co-administration of darunavir/ritonavir reduced the AUC of artemether (by 16%; 90% CI 0.69-1.02) and dihydroartemisinin (by 18%; 90% CI 0.74-0.91) but increased lumefantrine (2.75-fold; 90% CI 2.46-3.08) at steady state. Co-administration of artemether/lumefantrine had no effect on etravirine, darunavir or ritonavir AUC. No drug-related serious adverse events were reported during the study.. Co-administration of etravirine with artemether/lumefantrine may lower the antimalarial activity of artemether and should therefore be used with caution. Darunavir/ritonavir can be co-administered with artemether/lumefantrine without dose adjustment but should be used with caution.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antimalarials; Artemether; Artemisinins; Cross-Over Studies; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Ethanolamines; Fluorenes; Healthy Volunteers; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Lumefantrine; Malaria; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) have antimalarial activity in vitro and in murine models. The potential beneficial effect of HIV-1 PIs on malaria has not been studied in clinical settings. We used data from Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5208 sites where malaria is endemic to compare the incidence of clinically diagnosed malaria among HIV-infected adult women randomized to either lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) or to nevirapine (NVP)-based ART. We calculated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We conducted a recurrent events analysis that included both first and second clinical malarial episodes and also conducted analyses to assess the sensitivity of results to outcome misclassification. Among the 445 women in this analysis, 137 (31%) received a clinical diagnosis of malaria at least once during follow-up. Of these 137, 72 (53%) were randomized to LPV/r-based ART. Assignment to the LPV/r treatment group (n = 226) was not consistent with a large decrease in the hazard of first clinical malarial episode (hazard ratio = 1.11 [0.79 to 1.56]). The results were similar in the recurrent events analysis. Sensitivity analyses indicated the results were robust to reasonable levels of outcome misclassification. In this study, the treatment with LPV/r compared to NVP had no apparent beneficial effect on the incidence of clinical malaria among HIV-infected adult women. Additional research concerning the effects of PI-based therapy on the incidence of malaria diagnosed by more specific criteria and among groups at a higher risk for severe disease is warranted.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Deoxycytidine; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Incidence; Lopinavir; Malaria; Nevirapine; Organophosphonates; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) show antimalarial activity in vitro and in animals. Whether this translates into a clinical benefit in HIV-infected patients residing in malaria-endemic regions is unknown. We studied the incidence of malaria, as defined by blood smear positivity or a positive Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 antigen test, among 444 HIV-infected women initiating antiretroviral treatment (ART) in the OCTANE trial (A5208; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00089505). Participants were randomized to treatment with PI-containing vs. PI-sparing ART, and were followed prospectively for ≥48 weeks; 73% also received cotrimoxazole prophylaxis. PI-containing treatment was not associated with protection against malaria in this study population.

Topics: Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Malaria; Nevirapine; Ritonavir

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors show activity against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. We hypothesized that the incidence of malaria in HIV-infected children would be lower among children receiving lopinavir-ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) than among those receiving nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based ART.. We conducted an open-label trial in which HIV-infected children 2 months to 5 years of age who were eligible for ART or were currently receiving NNRTI-based ART were randomly assigned to either lopinavir-ritonavir-based ART or NNRTI-based ART and were followed for 6 months to 2 years. Cases of uncomplicated malaria were treated with artemether-lumefantrine. The primary end point was the incidence of malaria.. We enrolled 176 children, of whom 170 received the study regimen: 86 received NNRTI-based ART, and 84 lopinavir-ritonavir-based ART. The incidence of malaria was lower among children receiving the lopinavir-ritonavir-based regimen than among those receiving the NNRTI-based regimen (1.32 vs. 2.25 episodes per person-year; incidence-rate ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.97; P=0.04), as was the risk of a recurrence of malaria after treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (28.1% vs. 54.2%; hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.76; P=0.004). The median lumefantrine level on day 7 after treatment for malaria was significantly higher in the lopinavir-ritonavir group than in the NNRTI group. In the lopinavir-ritonavir group, lumefantrine levels exceeding 300 ng per milliliter on day 7 were associated with a reduction of more than 85% in the 63-day risk of recurrent malaria. A greater number of serious adverse events occurred in the lopinavir-ritonavir group than in the NNRTI group (5.6% vs. 2.3%, P=0.16). Pruritus occurred significantly more frequently in the lopinavir-ritonavir group, and elevated alanine aminotransferase levels significantly more frequently in the NNRTI group.. Lopinavir-ritonavir-based ART as compared with NNRTI-based ART reduced the incidence of malaria by 41%, with the lower incidence attributable largely to a significant reduction in the recurrence of malaria after treatment with artemether-lumefantrine. Lopinavir-ritonavir-based ART was accompanied by an increase in serious adverse events. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00978068.).

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antimalarials; Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination; Artemisinins; Child, Preschool; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ethanolamines; Female; Fluorenes; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Incidence; Infant; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lopinavir; Malaria; Male; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Secondary Prevention; Uganda

Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are the primary treatment for malaria. It is essential to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of ACTs in vulnerable populations at risk of suboptimal dosing. We developed a population PK/PD model using data from our previous study of artemether-lumefantrine in HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected children living in a high-transmission region of Uganda. HIV-infected children were on efavirenz-, nevirapine-, or lopinavir-ritonavir-based antiretroviral regimens, with daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis. We assessed selection for resistance in two key parasite transporters, pfcrt and pfmdr1, over 42-day follow-up and incorporated genotyping into a time-to-event model to ascertain how resistance genotype in relation to drug exposure impacts recurrence risk. Two hundred seventy-seven children contributed 364 episodes to the model (186 HIV-uninfected and 178 HIV-infected), with recurrent microscopy-detectable parasitemia detected in 176 episodes by day 42. The final model was a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and an estimated age effect on bioavailability. Systemic lumefantrine exposure was highest with lopinavir-ritonavir, lowest with efavirenz, and equivalent with nevirapine and HIV-uninfected children. HIV status and lumefantrine concentration were significant factors associated with recurrence risk. Significant selection was demonstrated for pfmdr1 N86 and pfcrt K76 in recurrent infections, with no evidence of selection for pfmdr1 Y184F. Less sensitive parasites were able to tolerate lumefantrine concentrations ~ 3.5-fold higher than more sensitive parasites. This is the first population PK model of lumefantrine in HIV-infected children and demonstrates selection for reduced lumefantrine susceptibility, a concern as we confront the threat to ACTs posed by emerging artemisinin resistance in Africa.

Topics: Antimalarials; Artemether; Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination; Artemisinins; Child; Drug Combinations; Fluorenes; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Lumefantrine; Malaria; Malaria, Falciparum; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; Uganda

Atazanavir-ritonavir (ATVr)-based antiretroviral therapy and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) are commonly used drugs for the treatment of human immune deficiency virus (HIV) infection and malaria respectively. However, interaction of both drugs, with Cytochrome P 3A4 (CYP 3A4) isoenzyme, may spawn clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions. This study evaluated the effects of atazanavir-ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of lumefantrine.. In a case-control study, twenty participants having Plasmodium falciparum malaria were recruited and divided into two groups (ATVr-arm, n=10; and control-arm, n= 10). All the participants were administered six oral doses of AL 80-480 mg (Coartem). Thereafter, their blood samples were collected at different time intervals over seven days. The concentration of lumefantrine in each sample was quantified with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and used to determine its pharmacokinetic parameters which were compared between the test and control groups.. ATVr increased the mean day 7 concentration of lumefantrine (ATVr 3847.09 ± 893.35 ng/mL, control 1374.53 ± 265.55 ng/mL, p = 0.016) and the area under its plasma concentration-time curve (ATVr 670529.57 ± 157172.93 ng.h/mL, control 447976.28 ± 80886.99 ng.h/mL, p = 0.224) by 179.88 % and 49.68 %, respectively, but decreased its mean maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) (ATVr 13725.70 ± 2658.44 ng/mL, control 15380.48 ± 2332.62 ng/mL, p = 0.645) by 10.76 %.. ATVr increased drug exposure and day 7 plasma concentration of lumefantrine. AL is therefore considered effective for the treatment of malaria in patients taking ATVr-based regimen. However, the safety associated with the interaction requires further elucidation.. Clin ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04531072, August 27, 2020. "Retrospectively registered".

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antimalarials; Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination; Atazanavir Sulfate; Case-Control Studies; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; Hospitals, Teaching; Humans; Malaria; Male; Middle Aged; Nigeria; Plasmodium falciparum; Racemases and Epimerases; Ritonavir

The coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir significantly reduces quinine concentration in healthy volunteers due to potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs). However, DDI information in malaria and HIV coinfected patients are lacking. The objective of the study was to apply physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to predict optimal dosage regimens of quinine when coadministered with lopinavir/ritonavir in malaria and HIV coinfected patients with different conditions. The developed model was validated against literature. Model verification was evaluated using the accepted method. The verified PBPK models successfully predicted unbound quinine disposition when coadministered with lopinavir/ritonavir in coinfected patients with different conditions. Suitable dose adjustments to counteract with the DDIs have identified in patients with various situations (i.e., a 7-day course at 1,800 mg t.i.d. in patients with malaria with HIV infection, 648 mg b.i.d. in chronic renal failure, 648 mg t.i.d. in hepatic insufficiency except for severe hepatic insufficiency (324 mg b.i.d.), and 648 mg t.i.d. in CYP3A4 polymorphism).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antimalarials; Coinfection; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Malaria; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Quinine; Ritonavir; Young Adult

Patients living with HIV in malarial endemic regions may experience clinically significant drug interaction between antiretroviral and antimalarial drugs. Effects of nevirapine (NVP), efavirenz (EFV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPVr) on lumefantrine (LM) therapeutic concentrations and toxicity were evaluated. In a four-arm parallel study design, the blood samples of 40 participants, treated with artemether/lumefantrine (AL), were analysed. Lumefantrine Cmax was increased by 32% (p = 0.012) and 325% (p < 0.0001) in the NVP and LPVr arms respectively but decreased by 62% (p < 0.0001) in the EFV-arm. AUC of LM was, respectively, increased by 50% (p = 0.27) and 328% (p < 0.0001) in the NVP and LPVr arms but decreased in the EFV-arm by 30% (p = 0.019). Median day 7 LM concentration was less than 280 ng/mL in EFV-arm (239 ng/mL) but higher in control (290 ng/mL), NVP (369 ng/mL, p = 0.004) and LPVr (1331 ng/mL, p < 0.0001) arms. There were no clinically relevant toxicities nor adverse events in both control and test arms. Artemether/lumefantrine is safe and effective for treatment of malaria in PLWHA taking NVP and LPVr based ART regimen but not EFV-based regimen.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antimalarials; Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Malaria; Male; Middle Aged; Nevirapine; Nigeria; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Topics: Alkynes; Antimalarials; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Malaria; Models, Biological; Population Groups; Pregnancy; Quinolines; Ritonavir; Serum Albumin, Human

Topics: Amodiaquine; Animals; Antimalarials; Artemisinins; Artesunate; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Lopinavir; Malaria; Mice; Plasmodium berghei; Ritonavir

The possibility of drug-drug interactions occurring during the treatment of malaria infection in human immunodeficient virus (HIV) patients receiving antiretroviral drugs is very high and limited data are available. This study reports the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir (LR) an antiretroviral drug on the antimalarial activity of standard dose of artemether/lumefantrine (AL) or artemether (AM) in a mouse model of Plasmodium berghei. The 50% effective dose (ED50) of AM alone (0.80 ± 0.15 and 2.18 ± 0.75 mg/kg) or in combination with LR (0.88 ± 0.40 and 3.53 ± 1.09 mg/kg) on days 4 and 5 post-infection was similar. In addition, treatment with a standard dose of AL alone or in combination with LR resulted in complete suppression of parasite growth. However, co-administration of LR with AL appears to be toxic resulting in lower survival of experimental animals in comparison to those treated with standard dose of AL alone.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antimalarials; Artemether; Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination; Artemisinins; Coinfection; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Ethanolamines; Fluorenes; HIV Infections; Lopinavir; Malaria; Mice; Plasmodium berghei; Ritonavir

The inhibitive activities of the human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors ritonavir (RTV) boosted indinavir (IDV) and RTV boosted lopinavir (LPV) for erythrocytic stage malaria were evaluated in rhesus macaques. The IDV/RTV regimen effectively inhibits the replication of Plasmodium knowlesi with clinically relevant doses, whereas the LPV/RTV regimen did not show activity against plasmodium infection.

Topics: Animals; Antimalarials; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Erythrocytes; Indinavir; Macaca mulatta; Malaria; Molecular Structure; Parasitic Sensitivity Tests; Plasmodium knowlesi; Ritonavir; Structure-Activity Relationship

HIV infection and malaria co-infection is not uncommon among children in co-endemic regions, and evidence suggests that HIV is a risk factor for severe malaria among children. HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) are highly effective in pediatric HIV treatment regimens, however, their effectiveness against malaria has been mixed, with some PIs demonstrating in vitro activity against Plasmodium falciparum. Recent findings suggest lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based treatment regimens reduce the incidence of malaria infection by over 40% in pediatric HIV patients compared to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens.. We assessed whether a significant reduction in malaria risk makes LPV/r-based ART regimens cost-effective compared to NNRTI-based regimens in co-endemic, low-resource settings. We modeled the difference in unit cost per disability adjusted life year (DALY) gained among two theoretical groups of HIV+ children under 5 years old receiving ART in a resource-limited setting co-endemic for malaria. The first group received standard NNRTI-based antiretrovirals, the second group received a standard regimen containing LPV/r. We used recent cohort data for the incidence reduction for malaria. Drug costs were taken from the 2011 Clinton Health Access Initiative Antiretroviral (ARV) ceiling price list. DALYs for HIV and malaria were derived from WHO estimates.. Our model suggests a unit cost of US$147 per DALY gained for the LPV/r-based group compared to US$37 per DALY gained for the NNRTI-based group.. In HIV and malaria co-endemic settings, considerations of PI cost effectiveness incorporating known reductions in malaria mortality suggest a nominal increase in DALYs gained for PIs over NNRTI-based regimens for HIV positive children under five on ART. Our analysis was based on several assumptions due to lack of sound data on malaria and HIV DALY attribution among pediatric populations. Further study in this area is required.

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Coinfection; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Incidence; Infant; Lopinavir; Malaria; Male; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ritonavir; Uganda

Plasmodium vivax malaria causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide, and only one drug is in clinical use that can kill the hypnozoites that cause P. vivax relapses. HIV and P. vivax malaria geographically overlap in many areas of the world, including South America and Asia. Despite the increasing body of knowledge regarding HIV protease inhibitors (HIV PIs) on P. falciparum malaria, there are no data regarding the effects of these treatments on P. vivax's hypnozoite form and clinical relapses of malaria. We have previously shown that the HIV protease inhibitor lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV-RTV) and the antibiotic trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) inhibit Plasmodium actively dividing liver stages in rodent malarias and in vitro in P. falciparum, but effect against Plasmodium dormant hypnozoite forms remains untested. Separately, although other antifolates have been tested against hypnozoites, the antibiotic trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, commonly used in HIV infection and exposure management, has not been evaluated for hypnozoite-killing activity. Since Plasmodium cynomolgi is an established animal model for the study of liver stages of malaria as a surrogate for P. vivax infection, we investigated the antimalarial activity of these drugs on Plasmodium cynomolgi relapsing malaria in rhesus macaques. Herein, we demonstrate that neither TMP-SMX nor LPV-RTV kills hypnozoite parasite liver stage forms at the doses tested. Because HIV and malaria geographically overlap, and more patients are being managed for HIV infection and exposure, understanding HIV drug impact on malaria infection is important.

Topics: Animals; Antimalarials; Female; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Lopinavir; Macaca mulatta; Malaria; Male; Plasmodium cynomolgi; Ritonavir; Sulfamethoxazole; Trimethoprim

Topics: Adenine; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cote d'Ivoire; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enterobacter aerogenes; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Fanconi Syndrome; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Malaria; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Pyelonephritis; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

Recent studies have demonstrated that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (PIs) exert inhibitory effects on erythrocytic stages of the human-malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum in vitro and on erythrocytic stages of the rodent-malaria parasite Plasmodium chabaudi in vivo. Although it remains unclear how HIV PIs inhibit the parasite, the effect seen on parasite development in the erythrocytic stages is potent. The effect on preerythrocytic stages has not yet been investigated. Using the rodent parasite Plasmodium berghei, we screened a panel of HIV PIs in vitro for effects on the preerythrocytic stages. Our data indicated that the HIV PIs lopinavir and saquinavir affect preerythrocytic-stage parasite development in vitro. We then evaluated the effect of HIV PIs on preerythrocytic stages in vivo using the rodent parasite Plasmodium yoelii. We found that lopinavir/ritonavir had a dose-dependent effect on liver-stage parasite development. Given that sub-Saharan Africa is where the HIV/AIDS pandemic intersects with malaria, these results merit analysis in clinical settings.

Topics: Animals; Anopheles; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Lopinavir; Malaria; Mice; Plasmodium; Plasmodium berghei; Plasmodium yoelii; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Antiretroviral protease inhibitors significantly potentiated the sensitivity of chloroquine-resistant malaria parasites to the antimalarial drug in vitro and in vivo. Ritonavir was found to be potent in potentiating CQ antimalarial activities in both -resistant and -sensitive lines. The mechanism by which the APIs modulate the CQ resistance in malaria parasites was further investigated. CQ-resistant parasites showed increased intracellular glutathione levels in comparison with the CQ-sensitive parasites. Treatment with APIs significantly reduced the levels of GSH and glutathione S-transferase activities in CQ-resistant parasites. Ritonavir also decreased glutathione reductase activities and glutathione peroxidase activities in CQ-resistant parasite line. Taken together, these results demonstrate that parasite GSH and GST may play an important role in CQ resistance and APIs are able to enhance the sensitivity of CQ-resistant malaria parasite to the drug by influencing the levels of GSH and the activities of the related enzymes.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antimalarials; Chloroquine; Drug Resistance; Drug Synergism; Female; Glutathione; Glutathione Peroxidase; Glutathione Reductase; Glutathione Transferase; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Malaria; Mice; Nelfinavir; Plasmodium chabaudi; Plasmodium falciparum; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

The synergy of the activities between chloroquine and various human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors was investigated in chloroquine-resistant and -sensitive malaria parasites. In both in vitro and in vivo assay systems, ritonavir was found to be the most potent in potentiating the antimalarial action of chloroquine.

Topics: Animals; Antimalarials; Atazanavir Sulfate; Chloroquine; Drug Resistance; Drug Synergism; Female; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Lopinavir; Malaria; Mice; Nelfinavir; Oligopeptides; Plasmodium chabaudi; Plasmodium falciparum; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir