ritonavir and Liver-Diseases

The pharmacokinetics of some HIV protease inhibitors are altered in patients with hepatic impairment. The TMC114-C134 study assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of darunavir/ritonavir 600 mg/100 mg twice daily in HIV-negative subjects with hepatic impairment (defined according to Child-Pugh classification A [mild] or B [moderate]) compared with matched, HIV-negative, healthy subjects.. All subjects received darunavir/ritonavir 600 mg/100 mg twice daily for 6 days with a morning dose on day 7. Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained up to 72 hours post-dose for darunavir and 12 hours post-dose for ritonavir on day 7. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.. Darunavir pharmacokinetics in subjects with mild (n = 8) and moderate (n = 8) hepatic impairment were comparable to those in matched healthy control subjects (n = 16). In those with mild hepatic impairment, the least square mean ratios relative to healthy subjects for darunavir exposure (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours) and for maximum and minimum plasma concentrations were 0.94 (90% CI 0.75, 1.17), 0.88 (90% CI 0.73, 1.07) and 0.83 (90% CI 0.63, 1.10), respectively. In those with moderate hepatic impairment, these values were 1.20 (90% CI 0.90, 1.60), 1.22 (90% CI 0.95, 1.56) and 1.27 (90% CI 0.87, 1.85), respectively. Ritonavir pharmacokinetics were comparable between healthy subjects and those with mild hepatic impairment, but mean exposure was 50% higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. Darunavir/ritonavir was generally well tolerated, regardless of hepatic impairment. All adverse events were grade 1-2 in severity, except for a grade 3 increase in alanine aminotransferase reported in one subject with mild hepatic impairment. No adverse events led to discontinuation.. The results of this study show that the pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir 600 mg/100 mg are not affected by mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Therefore, it is recommended that dose adjustments of darunavir/ritonavir are not required in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Liver Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

The effect of hepatic impairment on fosamprenavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics was investigated. Sixty human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects, including 13, 20, and 10 subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment, respectively, and a comparator group of 17 subjects with normal hepatic function, were enrolled. Subjects with normal hepatic function received fosamprenavir at 700 mg plus ritonavir at 100 mg twice daily, whereas subjects with hepatic impairment received adjusted doses in anticipation of increased exposures. For subjects with mild hepatic impairment, the studied regimen of fosamprenavir 700 mg twice daily plus ritonavir 100 mg once daily delivered 17% higher values for the maximum plasma amprenavir concentration at the steady state (C(max)), 22% higher values for the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve over the dosing interval at the steady state [AUC(0-tau)], similar values for the concentration at the end of the dosing interval (C(tau)), and 114% higher unbound C(tau) values. For subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, the studied dosage regimen of fosamprenavir at 300 mg twice daily plus ritonavir at 100 mg once daily delivered 27% lower plasma amprenavir C(max) values, 27% lower AUC(0-24) values, 57% lower C(tau) values, and 21% higher unbound amprenavir C(tau) values. For subjects with severe hepatic impairment, the studied dosage regimen of fosamprenavir at 300 mg twice daily plus ritonavir at 100 mg once daily delivered 19% lower plasma amprenavir C(max) values, 23% lower AUC(0-24) values, 38% lower C(tau) values, and similar unbound amprenavir C(tau) values. With a reduced ritonavir dosing frequency of 100 mg once daily, the plasma ritonavir AUC(0-24) values were 39% lower, similar, and 40% higher for subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment, respectively. The results of the study support the use of reduced fosamprenavir/ritonavir doses or dosing frequencies in the treatment of patients with hepatic impairment. No significant safety issues were identified; however, plasma amprenavir and ritonavir exposures were more variable in subjects with hepatic impairment, and those patients should be closely monitored for safety and virologic response.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Carbamates; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Liver Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

The effect of hepatic impairment on lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics was investigated. Twenty-four HIV-1-infected subjects received lopinavir 400 mg/ritonavir 100 mg twice daily prior to and during the study: 6 each with mild or moderate hepatic impairment (and hepatitis C virus coinfected) and 12 with normal hepatic function. Mild and moderate hepatic impairment showed similar effects on lopinavir pharmacokinetics. When the 2 hepatic impairment groups were combined, lopinavir Cmax and AUC12 were increased 20% to 30% compared to the controls. Hepatic impairment increased unbound lopinavir AUC12 by 68% and Cmax by 56%. The effect of hepatic impairment on low-dose ritonavir pharmacokinetics was more pronounced in the moderate impairment group (181% and 221% increase in AUC12 and Cmax, respectively) than in the mild impairment group (39% and 61% increase in AUC12 and Cmax, respectively). While lopinavir/ritonavir dose reduction is not recommended in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment, caution should be exercised in this population.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Liver Diseases; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Radioligand Assay; Ritonavir

We aimed to describe liver injury and identify the risk factors of liver injury in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients without chronic liver diseases (CLD). The clinical data of 228 confirmed COVID-19 patients without CLD were retrospectively collected from ten hospitals in Jiangsu, China. Sixty-seven (29.4%) of 228 patients without CLD showed abnormal liver function on admission, including increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (25 [11.0%]) U/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 30 [13.2%]) U/L, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) 28 [12.4%]) U/L, total bilirubin (Tbil) 16 [7.0%] μmol/L, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 10 [4.5%]) U/L. During hospitalization, 129 (56.3%) of 228 patients showed abnormal liver function, including elevated ALT (84 [36.8%]), AST (58 [25.4%]), GGT (67 [29.5%]), and Tbil (59 [25.9%]). Age over 50 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.086; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.030-4.225; p = .041), male sex (OR, 2.737; 95% CI, 1.418-5.284; p = .003), and lopinavir-ritonavir (OR, 2.504; 95% CI, 1.187-5.283; p = .016) were associated with higher risk of liver function abnormality, while the atomized inhalation of interferon α-2b (OR, 0.256; 95% CI 0.126-0.520; p < .001) was associated with reduced risk of liver function abnormality during hospitalization. Mild to moderate liver injury was common in COVID-19 patients in Jiangsu, China. Age over 50 years, male sex, and lopinavir-ritonavir were the independent risk factors of liver impairment in COVID-19 patients during hospitalization.

Topics: Adult; China; COVID-19; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Liver Diseases; Liver Function Tests; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; SARS-CoV-2; Viral Protease Inhibitors

Some patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection have abnormal liver function. We aimed to clarify the features of COVID-19-related liver damage to provide references for clinical treatment.. We performed a retrospective, single-center study of 148 consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19 (73 female, 75 male; mean age, 50 years) at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center from January 20 through January 31, 2020. Patient outcomes were followed until February 19, 2020. Patients were analyzed for clinical features, laboratory parameters (including liver function tests), medications, and length of hospital stay. Abnormal liver function was defined as increased levels of alanine and aspartate aminotransferase, gamma glutamyltransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin.. Fifty-five patients (37.2%) had abnormal liver function at hospital admission; 14.5% of these patients had high fever (14.5%), compared with 4.3% of patients with normal liver function (P = .027). Patients with abnormal liver function were more likely to be male, and had higher levels of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein. There was no statistical difference between groups in medications taken before hospitalization; a significantly higher proportion of patients with abnormal liver function (57.8%) had received lopinavir/ritonavir after admission compared to patients with normal liver function (31.3%). Patients with abnormal liver function had longer mean hospital stays (15.09 ± 4.79 days) than patients with normal liver function (12.76 ± 4.14 days) (P = .021).. More than one third of patients admitted to the hospital with SARS-CoV-2 infection have abnormal liver function, and this is associated with longer hospital stay. A significantly higher proportion of patients with abnormal liver function had received lopinavir/ritonavir after admission; these drugs should be given with caution.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Betacoronavirus; Bilirubin; Blood Chemical Analysis; China; Coronavirus Infections; COVID-19; Enzymes; Female; Hospitals; Humans; Liver Diseases; Liver Function Tests; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; SARS-CoV-2

We present here the case of a 62-year-old man, who was referred to the emergency department with fever and cough for 3 days. He underwent liver transplantation 4 years earlier due to HCV and NASH-related cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma. At admission he was in reduced general conditions. Nasopharyngeal smear specimen resulted positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pulmonary low-dose CT-scan revealed bilateral subpleural ground-glass infiltrates. O2 saturation was 93%. A treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine twice daily was started. The patient received also cefepime and remained in isolation. Seven days later imaging showed a progression of the pulmonary infiltrates. Cefepime was replaced by meropenem. During the following 3 days the fever resolved, and the general conditions of the patient significantly improved. Consequently, treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine was stopped. The evolution of SARS-CoV-2 interstitial pneumonia in this immunosuppressed patient was moderate to severe and liver injury was not clinically significant. Despite its limitations, this case report confirm that the liver may be only mildly affected during SARS-CoV-2 infection, also in liver transplanted patients. Further studies are needed to assess whether the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection is worse in immunosuppressed patients than in the general population.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Comorbidity; COVID-19; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Immunosuppression Therapy; Liver Diseases; Liver Transplantation; Lopinavir; Lung; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; SARS-CoV-2

To describe the characteristics of liver damage in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Sichuan area and the effect of antiviral drugs on liver function.. The clinical data of severe COVID-19 patients admitted to Chengdu Public Health Clinical Medical Center from January 21 to February 24, 2020 were retrospectively collected, including demographic data, clinical manifestations and liver function changes within 1 week after admission to intensive care unit (ICU). The changes of liver function during the course of disease in severe COVID-19 patients were analyzed and summarized, and group analysis was performed.. A total of 30 COVID-19 patients with complete clinical data were enrolled. The incidence of severe COVID-19 in elderly men was higher (60.0%), with median age of 61 (47, 79) years old, and those aged 80 or above accounted for 23.3%. The severe COVID-19 patients mainly presented with respiratory symptoms such as fever (96.7%), cough (80.0%) and dyspnea (66.7%). The alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBil) and prothrombin time (PT) of 30 patients were increased to various degrees within 1 week after ICU admission, and albumin (ALB) was decreased. (1) The patients were divided into two groups according to whether to take lopinavir/ritonavir (kaletra). It was shown that the incidence of liver dysfunction in patients taking kaletra was significantly higher than those who did not take kaletra (7-day abnormal rate of ALT was 54% vs. 33%, the abnormal rate of AST was 38% vs. 33%, the abnormal rate of TBil was 8% vs. 0%), but there were no statistical differences (all P > 0.05). (2) The patients were divided into normal dose group (500 mg, twice a day, n = 19) and reduced dose group (250 mg, twice a day, n = 5) according to the dosage of kaletra. It was shown that patients taking low-dose kaletra had a smaller effect on liver function within 1 week after ICU admission than those receiving normal dosage, and ALB, TBil in the reduced dose group were significantly lower than those in the normal dose group on the 2nd day after ICU admission [ALB (g/L): 33.3±2.0 vs. 37.5±4.0, TBil (μmol/L): 6.3±3.3 vs. 11.3±4.8, both P < 0.05].. Severe COVID-19 patients in Sichuan area suffered obvious liver damage in the early course of the disease and have a slower recovery. It is important to pay attention to avoid using drugs that can aggravate liver damage while treating the disease. If there is no alternative drug, liver protection treatment should be considered appropriately.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; China; Coronavirus Infections; COVID-19; Drug Combinations; Humans; Liver Diseases; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant with a large inter-individual variability. The present study is to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict several scenarios in clinical practice.. A whole-body PBPK model for rivaroxaban, which is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/5, 2J2 pathways and excreted via kidneys, was developed to predict the pharmacokinetics at different doses in healthy subjects and patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction. Hepatic clearance and drug-drug interactions (DDI) were estimated by in vitro in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) based on parameters obtained from in vitro experiments. To validate the model, observed concentrations were compared with predicted concentrations, and the impact of special scenarios was investigated.. The PBPK model successfully predicted the pharmacokinetics for healthy subjects and patients as well as DDIs. Sensitivity analysis shows that age, renal, and hepatic clearance are important factors affecting rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics. The predicted fold increase of rivaroxaban AUC values when combined administered with the inhibitors such as ketoconazole, ritonavir, and clarithromycin were 2.3, 2.2, and 1.3, respectively. When DDIs and hepatic dysfunction coexist, the fold increase of rivaroxaban exposure would increase significantly compared with one factor alone.. Our study using PBPK modeling provided a reasonable approach to evaluate exposure levels in special patients under special scenarios. Although further clinical study or real-life experience would certainly merit the current work, the modeling work so far would at least suggest caution of using rivaroxaban in complicated clinical settings.

Topics: Adult; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Clarithromycin; Computer Simulation; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Humans; Ketoconazole; Liver Diseases; Male; Models, Biological; Renal Insufficiency; Ritonavir; Rivaroxaban

Ritonavir (RIT) is a human immune deficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor (PI) active against HIV-1 and HIV-2. Among various adverse effects of PIs, hepatotoxicity is a very common adverse reaction of RIT which is concentration dependent. Red clover isoflavones are found to possess anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anti-apoptosis activity. Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated that these isoflavones can be used to alleviate the side-effects of drugs. Hence, the present study was inquested to ascertain the effect of Formononetin (FMN) and Biochanin A (BCA) on RIT induced hepatotoxicity.. Five groups of animals were subjected to treatment as control, toxic control (RIT), third group (RIT + FMN), fourth group (RIT + BCA), the fifth group (RIT + FMN + BCA) and sixth group (FMN + BCA) for 14 days. The animals were evaluated for estimation of liver toxicity markers, inflammatory biomarkers, in-vivo biochemical antioxidant parameters. The liver tissues were further evaluated histopathologically and western blotting examination for localization of apoptotic gene expression that plays a pivotal role in hepatotoxicity.. FMN and BCA ameliorated the increased levels of biochemical markers of liver, attenuated the RIT induced Bax, caspase-3, NFκB and eNOS activation and persuaded the Bcl. FMN and BCA exerts hepatoprotective effect through modulating the oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis and reversing the tissue degeneration suggesting its therapeutic role in hepatotoxicity and other hepatocellular diseases.

Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Apoptosis; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Genistein; Isoflavones; Liver; Liver Diseases; Male; NF-kappa B; Oxidative Stress; Protective Agents; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Ritonavir

Management of comorbidities and medications is complex in HIV-1-infected patients. The overall objective of this project was to develop separate physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) substrate models for the protease inhibitors darunavir and lopinavir. These protease inhibitors are used in the treatment of HIV infection. Both darunavir and lopinavir are coadministered with another medication that inhibits cytochrome (CYP) 3A. The current project focused on PBPK modeling for darunavir and lopinavir coadministered with ritonavir. Darunavir and lopinavir PBPK models that accounted for ritonavir CYP3A inhibition effects (linked PBPK models) were developed. The linked PBPK models were then used to predict the effect on darunavir or lopinavir exposure from CYP modulators. In the next step, the predicted effect of hepatic impairment was evaluated. Additional exploratory analyses predicted CYP3A inhibition effects on darunavir or lopinavir exposure in simulated hepatically impaired subjects. The linked PBPK models reasonably predicted darunavir or lopinavir exposure based on simulations with CYP inhibitors or inducers. Exploratory simulations using the linked darunavir or lopinavir PBPK models indicated CYP3A inhibition may further increase darunavir or lopinavir exposure in patients with hepatic impairment.

Topics: Adult; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inducers; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Female; Healthy Volunteers; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Liver Diseases; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Ritonavir; Young Adult

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of amprenavir and ritonavir in HIV-infected patients with different degrees of hepatic impairment.. HIV-positive patients receiving fosamprenavir/ritonavir (700/100 mg twice daily) were included. Patients were classified into three groups: (i) chronic hepatitis; (ii) liver cirrhosis; (iii) normal liver function. Serial blood samples for steady-state amprenavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics (>14 days on treatment) were collected in the fasting state before the morning dose (C(trough)) and then 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after drug intake. Amprenavir and ritonavir plasma concentrations were determined by HPLC.. Twenty-one HIV-infected patients were included. Seven had chronic hepatitis, eight had liver cirrhosis and six patients were in the control group. Amprenavir AUC(0-12), AUC(0-infinity), C(max) and C(ss) were increased by 50% to 60% in the cirrhotic group when compared with controls, whereas CL/F was decreased by 40%. Patients with chronic hepatitis showed a significant increase in AUC(0-12), C(max) and C(ss) values when compared with controls. Ritonavir pharmacokinetics was different only in cirrhotic patients when compared with controls. Liver function parameters at weeks 4, 12 and 24 were not different from baseline in any of the groups. Overall, a significant correlation between amprenavir AUC(0-12) and total bilirubin values on the day of pharmacokinetic analysis was found (r = 0.64, P = 0.003).. On the basis of these data and also of data available in the literature, it seems reasonable to adapt the dose of fosamprenavir and/or ritonavir exclusively in the presence of adverse events, possibly related to protease inhibitors (i.e. liver toxicity), in subjects with high drug plasma levels. Therapeutic drug monitoring is advised in the management of these patients.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Attention; Bilirubin; Carbamates; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Plasma; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Time Factors

In RESIST, enfuvirtide co-administered with ritonavir-boosted tipranavir was associated with higher plasma tipranavir concentrations, which seldom rose above those associated with an increased risk of grade 3/4 transaminase elevations. Transaminase elevation rates (6.5%) and clinical hepatic event rates (5.9 events/100 person exposure years) were lower in the tipranavir/ritonavir with enfuvirtide group than in the tipranavir/ritonavir without enfuvirtide group. Observed increases in plasma tipranavir concentrations thus had no apparent effect on the risk of hepatotoxicity.

Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Anti-HIV Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Liver Diseases; Lopinavir; Peptide Fragments; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

We describe the hepatotoxicity encountered in a cohort of HIV-positive patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir. We used the database from the SCOLTA project, an on-line pharmacovigilance programme involving 25 Italian infectious disease centres. A total of 755 patients were followed, over a mean observation period of 16 months. The incidence of severe events was low despite the high prevalence of patients co-infected with hepatitis virus at enrollment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Female; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Incidence; Italy; Liver Diseases; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

With the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV positivity is no longer a contraindication for liver transplantation. Some of the antiretroviral agents, particularly protease inhibitors (e.g., ritonavir, indinavir, and nelfinavir) have been described as potent inhibitors of the metabolism of certain immunosuppressive drugs. In this article we describe a profound interaction between tacrolimus and Kaletra (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) (a combination of lopinavir and ritonavir) in 3 liver transplantation patients. Patient 1, who was maintained on a 5 mg twice daily dose of tacrolimus with a trough blood concentration around 10.6 ng/mL, required only 0.5 mg of tacrolimus per week after addition of Kaletra to achieve similar tacrolimus blood concentrations, with a half-life of 10.6 days. In patient 2, the area under the blood concentration versus time curve for tacrolimus increased from 31 ng/mL/h to 301 ng/mL/h after addition of Kaletra, with a corresponding half-life of 20 days. When the patient was subsequently switched to nelfinavir, the half-life decreased to 10.3 days. Patient 3, who was maintained with 4 to 8 mg/d of tacrolimus and a corresponding blood concentration of 10 ng/mL before Kaletra, required a tacrolimus dose of 1 mg/wk and tacrolimus concentrations of 5 ng/mL with Kaletra. In conclusion, a combination of lopinavir and ritonavir led to a much more profound increase in tacrolimus blood concentrations than use of single protease inhibitor, nelfinavir. A tacrolimus dose of less than 1 mg/wk may be sufficient to maintain adequate blood tacrolimus concentrations in patients on Kaletra. Patients may not need a further dose of tacrolimus for 3 to 5 weeks depending on liver function when therapy with Kaletra is initiated. Great caution is required in the management of tacrolimus dosage when Kaletra is introduced or withdrawn in HIV-positive patients after liver transplantation, particularly in the presence of hepatic dysfunction.

Topics: Adult; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Liver Diseases; Liver Transplantation; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Tacrolimus