ritonavir and HIV-Infections

Multiple factors may affect combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). We investigated the impact of food, beverages, dietary supplements, and alcohol on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of 33 antiretroviral drugs. Systematic review in adherence to PRISMA guidelines was performed, with 109 reports of 120 studies included. For each drug, meta-analyses or qualitative analyses were conducted. We have found clinically significant interactions with food for more than half of antiretroviral agents. The following drugs should be taken with or immediately after the meal: tenofovir disoproxil, etravirine, rilpivirine, dolutegravir, elvitegravir, atazanavir, darunavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir. Didanosine, zalcitabine, zidovudine, efavirenz, amprenavir, fosamprenavir, and indinavir should be taken on an empty stomach for maximum patient benefit. Antiretroviral agents not mentioned above can be administered regardless of food. There is insufficient evidence available to make recommendations about consuming juice or alcohol with antiretroviral drugs. Resolving drug-food interactions may contribute to maximized cART effectiveness and safety.. Múltiples factores pueden afectar la terapia antirretroviral combinada (cART). Investigamos el impacto de los alimentos, las bebidas, los suplementos dietéticos y el alcohol en los parámetros farmacocinéticos y farmacodinámicos de 33 medicamentos antirretrovirales. Se realizó la revisión sistemática en apego a las guías PRISMA, con 109 reportes de 120 estudios incluidos. Para cada fármaco se realizaron metanálisis o análisis cualitativos. Hemos encontrado interacciones clínicamente significativas con alimentos para más de la mitad de los fármacos antirretrovirales. Los siguientes medicamentos deben tomarse durante o inmediatamente después de comer: tenofovir, disoproxil, etravirina, rilpivirine, dolutegravir, elvitegravir, atazanavir, darunavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir. Didanosina, zalcitabina, zidovudina, efavirenz, amprenavir, fosamprenavir e indinavir deben tomarse con el estómago vacío para obtener el máximo beneficio para el paciente. Los fármacos antirretrovirales no mencionados anteriormente se pueden administrar independientemente de los alimentos. No hay suficiente evidencia disponible para hacer recomendaciones sobre el consumo de jugo o alcohol con medicamentos antirretrovirales. Resolver las interacciones entre medicamentos y alimentos puede contribuir a maximizar la eficacia y la seguridad de cART.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Beverages; Dietary Supplements; Ethanol; HIV Infections; Humans; Ritonavir

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection promotes an aggressive disease course of HBV infection. In the only available non-Cochrane systematic review on antiviral therapy during pregnancy for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HBV, none of the women studied had HBV-HIV co-infection but were either HBV- or HIV-seropositive. Treatment of HBV alone may develop HIV-strains that are resistant to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Accordingly, co-treatment of the HIV infection is recommended.. To evaluate the benefits and harms of tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens versus placebo, tenofovir alone, or non-tenofovir-based antiviral regimen either alone or in combination with HBV for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HBV in HIV-positive pregnant women co-infected with HBV.. We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, LILACS (Bireme), Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (Web of Science) on 30 January 2023. We manually searched the reference lists of included trials, searched on-line trial registries, and contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies for any further potential trials.. We aimed to include randomised clinical trials comparing tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens (anti-HIV regimen with lopinavir-ritonavir therapy, or any other antiviral therapy, and two drugs with activity against HBV, specifically, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), plus lamivudine or emtricitabine) with placebo alone, or tenofovir alone, or non-tenofovir-based antiviral regimen (zidovudine, lamivudine, telbivudine, emtricitabine, entecavir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or any other antiviral therapy) either alone or in combination with at least two other antivirals.. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcomes included all-cause infant mortality, proportion of infants with serious adverse events, proportion of infants with HBV mother-to-child transmission, all-cause maternal mortality, and proportion of mothers with serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included proportion of infants with adverse events not considered serious, proportion of mothers with detectable HBV DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) (before delivery), maternal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to HBe-antibody seroconversion (before delivery) and maternal adverse events not considered serious. We used RevMan Web to carry out analyses and presented results, where feasible, using a random-effects model and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We performed sensitivity analysis. We assessed risk of bias using predefined domains, assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE, controlled risk of random errors with Trial Sequential Analysis, and presented outcome results in a summary of findings table.. Five completed trials were included, of which four trials contributed data to one or more of the outcomes. They included a total of 533 participants randomised to tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens (196 participants) versus control (337 participants). The control groups received non-tenofovir-based antiviral regimens either as zidovudine alone (three trials) or as a combination of zidovudine, lamivudine and lopinavir-ritonavir (five trials). None of the trials used placebo or tenofovir alone. All trials were at unclear risk of bias. Four trials used intention-to-treat analyses. In the remaining trial, two participants in the intervention group and two in the control group were lost to follow-up. However, the outcomes of these four participants were not described. Tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimen versus control We are very uncertain about the effect of a tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimen versus control on all-cause infant mortality (RR 2.24, 95% CI 0.72 to 6.96; participants = 132; trials = 1; very low-certainty evidence); proportion of infants with serious adverse events (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.43; participants = 132; trials = 1; very low-certainty evidence), and proportion of mothers with serious adverse events (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.32; participants = 262; trials = 2; very low-certainty evidence). No trial reported data on the proportion of infants with HBV mother-to-child transmission and all-cause maternal mortality. We are also very uncertain about the effect of tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens versus control on the proportion of infants with adverse events not considered serious (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.06 to 13.68; participants = 31; trials = 1; very low-certainty evidence), and proportion of mothers with detectable HBV DNA (before delivery) (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.02; participants = 169; trials = 2; very low-certainty evidence). No trial reported data on maternal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to HBe-antibody seroconversion (before delivery) and maternal adverse events not considered serious. All trials received support from industry.. We do not know what the effects of tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens are on all-cause infant mortality, proportion of infants with serious adverse events and proportion of mothers with serious adverse events, proportion of infants with adverse events not considered serious, and proportion of mothers with detectable HBV DNA before delivery because the certainty of evidence was very low. Only one or two trials, with insufficient power, contributed data for analyses. We lack randomised clinical trials at low risk of systematic and random errors, and fully reporting all-cause infant mortality, serious adverse events and reporting on clinical and laboratory outcomes, such as infants with HBV mother-to-child transmission, all-cause maternal mortality, maternal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to HBe-antibody seroconversion before delivery and maternal adverse events not considered serious.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Coinfection; DNA, Viral; Emtricitabine; Female; Hepatitis B e Antigens; Hepatitis B virus; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Seropositivity; Humans; Infant; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Zidovudine

We report the first published case of a drug induced liver injury (DILI) presumed secondary to a drug-drug interaction between ritonavir and levonorgestrel progestogen-only emergency contraception (POEC). Our patient is a 25-year-old female living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), taking antiretroviral therapy (ART) containing tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine and darunavir/ritonavir. She was found to have elevated transaminases at a routine clinic appointment consistent with hepatocellular DILI. Further investigation found the most likely cause of this was a drug-drug interaction (DDI) between the ritonavir component of her ART and recent use of levonorgestrel POEC 3 days earlier. Evidence suggests that ritonavir increases levonorgestrel exposure, yet our patient received double the usual dose as per dispensing guidance at the time. We review the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-levonorgestrel DDIs and highlight the need for consistent guidelines on this topic.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Levonorgestrel; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

The use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in pregnancy is important for maternal health, and has been successful in reducing vertical transmission rates to almost zero in those taking effective ART regimens with good adherence. However, there are reports of higher rates of low birthweight and preterm births in women with HIV, which can be further exacerbated by ART usage in pregnancy. Protease inhibitors, and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in particular, might directly contribute to placental and uteroplacental pathology in part by altering plasma concentrations of the essential steroid hormones of pregnancy, progesterone and oestradiol. In this Review, we collate the increasing evidence of dysregulated maternal endocrinology, reproductive physiology, and placental compromise associated with protease inhibitors. Based on findings of placental and decidual effects, we recommend that ritonavir-boosted lopinavir should be avoided in pregnancy, in line with US and European guidelines. Long-term follow-up of children exposed to protease inhibitors in utero is also recommended.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Decidua; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lopinavir; Placenta; Pregnancy; Progesterone; Protease Inhibitors; Ritonavir

Ethambutol protects against the development of resistance to co-administered drugs in the intensive phase of first-line anti-TB treatment in children. It is especially relevant in settings with a high prevalence of HIV or isoniazid resistance. We describe the population pharmacokinetics of ethambutol in children with TB to guide dosing in this population.. We pooled data from 188 intensively sampled children from the DATiC, DNDi and SHINE studies, who received 15-25 mg/kg ethambutol daily according to WHO guidelines. The median (range) age and weight of the cohort were 1.9 (0.3-12.6) years and 9.6 (3.9-34.5) kg, respectively. Children with HIV (HIV+; n = 103) received ART (lopinavir/ritonavir in 92%).. Ethambutol pharmacokinetics were best described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination and absorption transit compartments. Clearance was estimated to reach 50% of its mature value by 2 months after birth and 99% by 3 years. Typical steady-state apparent clearance in a 10 kg child was 15.9 L/h. In HIV+ children on lopinavir/ritonavir, bioavailability was reduced by 32% [median (IQR) steady-state Cmax = 0.882 (0.669-1.28) versus 1.66 (1.21-2.15) mg/L). In young children, bioavailability correlated with age. At birth, bioavailability was 73.1% of that in children 3.16 years or older.. To obtain exposure within the 2-6 mg/L recommended range for Cmax, the current doses must be doubled (or tripled with HIV+ children on lopinavir/ritonavir) for paediatric patients. This raises concerns regarding the potential for ocular toxicity, which would require evaluation.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Ethambutol; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lopinavir; Ritonavir

Although rifampin drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies are routinely conducted, there have been instances of liver function test (LFT) elevations, warranting further evaluation. A literature review was conducted to identify studies in which combination with rifampin resulted in hepatic events and evaluate any similarities. Over 600 abstracts and manuscripts describing rifampin DDI studies were first evaluated, of which 30 clinical studies reported LFT elevations. Out of these, 11 studies included ritonavir in combination with other drug(s) in the rifampin DDI study. The number of subjects that were discontinued from treatment on these studies ranged from 0 to 71 (0-100% of subjects in each study). The number of subjects hospitalized for adverse events in these studies ranged from 0 to 41 (0-83.67% of subjects in each study). LFT elevations in greater than 50% of subjects were noted during the concomitant administration of rifampin with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors and with lorlatinib; with labeled contraindication due to observed hepatotoxicity related safety findings only for saquinavir/ritonavir and lorlatinib. In the lorlatinib and ritonavir DDI studies, considerable LFT elevations were observed rapidly, typically within 24-72 h following co-administration. A possible sequence effect has been speculated, where rifampin induction prior to administration of the combination may be associated with increased severity of the LFT elevations. The potential role of rifampin in the metabolic activation of certain drugs into metabolites with hepatic effects needs to be taken into consideration when conducting rifampin DDI studies, particularly those for which the metabolic profiles are not fully elucidated.

Topics: Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Function Tests; Rifampin; Ritonavir

AIDS is one of the world's most serious public health challenges. Protease inhibitors are key components of AIDS treatment regimen. Ritonavir is a well-known protease inhibitor with low aqueous solubility belonging to BCS class II category. Some of the severe adverse effects associated with this drug restricted its use in the treatment of AIDS. However, several attempts were made by researchers in the past to enhance the oral bioavailability of Ritonavir.. The current review mainly focuses on the adverse effects of Ritonavir and recent approaches followed by researchers on the development of nanoformulations of Ritonavir. Further, various patents filed on Ritonavir have also been discussed in the current review.. Most research on nanoformulation development for Ritonavir is mainly focused on enhancing the solubility and oral bioavailability of the drug. Some of the researchers focused on the lymphatic targeting of the drug in order to bypass the hepatic metabolism of the drug. However, most of the research topics did not cover the toxicity evaluation of the developed formulation. Since the major issue of Ritonavir is not only oral bioavailability but also drug-induced toxicity, this area needs to be considered during the formulation development.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Ritonavir; Solubility

Lopinavir/ritonavir is a potent coformulation of protease inhibitors used against HIV infection. Lopinavir is the main responsible for viral load suppression, whereas ritonavir is a pharmacokinetic enhancer. Both of them have recently gained relevance as candidate drugs against severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19). However, significant beneficial effects were not observed in randomized clinical trials. This review summarizes the main physical-chemical, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic properties of ritonavir and lopinavir, along with the analytical methodologies applied for biological matrices, pharmaceutical formulations, and stability studies. The work also aimed to provide a comprehensive impurity profile for the combined formulation. Several analytical methods in four different pharmacopeias and 37 articles in literature were evaluated and summarized. Chromatographic methods for these drugs frequently use C8 or C18 stationary phases with acetonitrile and phosphate buffer (with ultraviolet detection) or acetate buffer (with tandem mass spectrometry detection) as the mobile phase. Official compendia methods show disadvantages as extended total run time and complex mobile phases. HPLC tandem-mass spectrometry provided high sensitivity in methodologies applied for human plasma and serum samples, supporting the therapeutic drug monitoring in HIV patients. Ritonavir and lopinavir major degradation products arise in alkaline and acidic environments, respectively. Other non-chromatographic methods were also summarized. Establishing the impurity profile for the combined formulation is challenging due to a large number of impurities reported. Easier and faster analytical methods for impurity assessment are still needed.

Topics: COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Drug Compounding; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Ritonavir

Abacavir is part of WHO-recommended regimens to treat HIV in children under 15 years of age. In a pooled analysis across four studies, we describe abacavir population pharmacokinetics to investigate the influence of age, concomitant medications, malnutrition and formulation.. A total of 230 HIV-infected African children were included, with median (range) age of 2.1 (0.1-12.8) years and weight of 9.8 (2.5-30.0) kg. The population pharmacokinetics of abacavir was described using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling.. Abacavir pharmacokinetics was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination, and absorption described by transit compartments. Clearance was predicted around 54% of its mature value at birth and 90% at 10 months. The estimated typical clearance at steady state was 10.7 L/h in a child weighing 9.8 kg co-treated with lopinavir/ritonavir, and was 12% higher in children receiving efavirenz. During coadministration of rifampicin-based antituberculosis treatment and super-boosted lopinavir in a 1:1 ratio with ritonavir, abacavir exposure decreased by 29.4%. Malnourished children living with HIV had higher abacavir exposure initially, but this effect waned with nutritional rehabilitation. An additional 18.4% reduction in clearance after the first abacavir dose was described, suggesting induction of clearance with time on lopinavir/ritonavir-based therapy. Finally, absorption of the fixed dose combination tablet was 24% slower than the abacavir liquid formulation.. In this pooled analysis we found that children on lopinavir/ritonavir or efavirenz had similar abacavir exposures, while concomitant TB treatment and super-boosted lopinavir gave significantly reduced abacavir concentrations.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Dideoxynucleosides; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lopinavir; Malnutrition; Ritonavir

Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Drug Combinations; Drug Repositioning; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Ritonavir; SARS-CoV-2

There are significant drug-drug interactions between human immunodeficiency virus antiretroviral therapy and intranasal steroids, leading to high serum concentrations of iatrogenic steroids and subsequently Cushing's syndrome.. All articles in the literature on cases of intranasal steroid and antiretroviral therapy interactions were reviewed. Full-length manuscripts were analysed and the relevant data were extracted.. A literature search and further cross-referencing yielded a total of seven reports on drug-drug interactions of intranasal corticosteroids and human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors, published between 1999 and 2019.. The use of potent steroids metabolised via CYP3A4, such as fluticasone and budesonide, are not recommended for patients taking ritonavir or cobicistat. Mometasone should be used cautiously with ritonavir because of pharmacokinetic similarities to fluticasone. There was a delayed onset of symptoms in many cases, most likely due to the relatively lower systemic bioavailability of intranasal fluticasone.

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Cobicistat; Cushing Syndrome; Drug Interactions; Fluticasone; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Ritonavir

Treating malaria in HIV-coinfected individuals should consider potential drug-drug interactions. Artemether-lumefantrine is the most widely recommended treatment for uncomplicated malaria globally. Lumefantrine is metabolized by CYP3A4, an enzyme that commonly used antiretrovirals often induce or inhibit. A population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis was conducted using individual participant data from 10 studies with 6,100 lumefantrine concentrations from 793 nonpregnant adult participants (41% HIV-malaria-coinfected, 36% malaria-infected, 20% HIV-infected, and 3% healthy volunteers). Lumefantrine exposure increased 3.4-fold with coadministration of lopinavir-ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART), while it decreased by 47% with efavirenz-based ART and by 59% in the patients with rifampin-based antituberculosis treatment. Nevirapine- or dolutegravir-based ART and malaria or HIV infection were not associated with significant effects. Monte Carlo simulations showed that those on concomitant efavirenz or rifampin have 49% and 80% probability of day 7 concentrations <200 ng/ml, respectively, a threshold associated with an increased risk of treatment failure. The risk of achieving subtherapeutic concentrations increases with larger body weight. An extended 5-day and 6-day artemether-lumefantrine regimen is predicted to overcome these drug-drug interactions with efavirenz and rifampin, respectively.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antimalarials; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination; Body Weight; Computer Simulation; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Lumefantrine; Malaria; Male; Middle Aged; Monte Carlo Method; Ritonavir; Young Adult

Pharmacokinetic boosting of antiretroviral (ARV) therapies with either ritonavir or cobicistat is used to achieve target drug exposure, lower pill burden, and provide simplified dosing schedules. Several ARVs require boosting, including the integrase inhibitor elvitegravir as well as protease inhibitors such as darunavir, atazanavir, and lopinavir. The use of boosted regimens in pregnant women living with HIV has been studied for a variety of ARVs; however, a recent recommendation by the US Food and Drug Administration advised against cobicistat-boosted regimens in pregnancy due to substantially lower drug exposures observed in clinical pharmacokinetic studies. The objectives of this article are to review pharmacokinetic enhancement of ARVs with ritonavir and cobicistat during pregnancy and postpartum, describe clinical implications, and provide recommendations for future research.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Cobicistat; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Ritonavir

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Atazanavir/ritonavir over lopinavir/ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection.. Clinical trials with a head-to-head comparison of atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 were included. Electronic databases: PubMed/Medline CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Viral suppression below 50 copies/ml at the longest follow-up period was the primary outcome measure. Grade 2-4 treatment-related adverse drug events, lipid profile changes and grade 3-4 bilirubin elevations were used as secondary outcome measures.. A total of nine articles from seven trials with 1938 HIV-1 patients were included in the current study. Atazanavir/ritonavir has 13% lower overall risk of failure to suppress the virus level < 50 copies/ml than lopinavir/ritonavir in fixed effect model (pooled RR: 0.87; CI: 0.78, 0.96; P=0.006). The overall risk of hyperbilirubinemia is very high for atazanavir/ritonavir than lopinavir/ritonavir in the random effects model (pooled RR: 45.03; CI: 16.03, 126.47; P< 0.0001).. Atazanavir/ritonavir has a better viral suppression at lower risk of lipid abnormality than lopinavir/ritonavir. The risk and development of hyperbilirubinemia from atazanavir-based regimens should be taken into consideration both at the time of prescribing and patient follow-up.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Lopinavir; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Cobicistat; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Ritonavir

Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is the most prevalent malignant neoplasia in human immunodeficiency virus positive (HIV+) patients for which the primary mode of management was chemotherapy.. We have presented the case of a newly diagnosed HIV+ male patient who was diagnosed with a pedunculated nodule in the anterior region of the hard palate, measuring 3.5 cm in diameter and with 2 months of evolution.. Histopathological examination confirmed the clinical hypothesis of KS. Soon after the diagnosis, the patient started using combined antiretroviral therapy (Biovir and Kaletra), presenting a significant reduction of the lesion after 4 weeks. With 1.5 cm in diameter, the lesion was surgically removed. The patient was followed-up for 10 years without any recurrence.. In antiretroviral-naive patients with a well-preserved immune system, the use of cART may be efficient in reducing the progression of the KS lesions, thus avoiding the use of chemotherapeutic agents.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Mouth Neoplasms; Ritonavir; Sarcoma, Kaposi; Zidovudine

Infants who acquire HIV have an exceptionally high risk of morbidity and mortality if they do not receive antiretroviral therapy (ART).. This review aims to summarize the currently available evidence on ART in HIV-infected neonates. Data were obtained from literature searches from PubMed, abstracts from International Conferences (2000-2017), and authors' files. Current evidence favors early diagnosis and prompt ART of HIV infection in newborns. The precise timing of initiation of ART remains undetermined. Very early (close to birth) ART appears to limit the size of the viral reservoir and may restrict replication-competent virus, but the clinical benefit remains unproven. Among the current options for initial therapy, in full term neonates from 2 weeks of life onwards, a lopinavir/ritonavir-based three-drug regimen is preferred. In term infants, younger than 2 weeks a nevirapine-based regimen is recommended, although there are no clinical trial data supporting that initiating treatment before 2 weeks improves outcome compared to starting afterwards. Existing safety information is insufficient to recommend ART in preterm infants, with pharmacokinetic data available for zidovudine only. If ART is considered in this setting, an individual case assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of treatment should be made.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Early Diagnosis; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; Zidovudine

To review the evidence linking use of HIV protease inhibitors with excess risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in HIV+ populations.. For the two contemporary most frequently used protease inhibitors, darunavir and atazanavir [both pharmacologically boosted with ritonavir (/r)], darunavir/r has been shown to be associated with increased CVD risk. The effect is cumulative with longer exposure increasing risk and an effect size comparable to what has been observed for previously developed protease inhibitors. Biological mechanisms may be overlapping and include perturbed lipid metabolism and accumulation of cholesterol derivatives within macrophages. Conversely, atazanavir/r has not been shown to be associated with CVD, possibly because of its ability to increase cardioprotective bilirubin levels.. Evidence linking protease inhibitors to CVD is based on observational studies only, whereas plausible biological explanations are well established and derived from randomized trials and controlled experiments. Given the possible association with clinical disease, a conservative approach to apply the data in daily practise is proposed which is focused on individualization of care based on underlying risk of CVD.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cardiovascular Diseases; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Risk Assessment; Ritonavir

Darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) is a second-generation protease inhibitor used in treatment-naïve and -experienced HIV-positive adult patients. To evaluate efficacy and safety in these patient settings, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. We considered eight studies involving 4240 antiretroviral treatment (ART)-naïve patients and 14 studies involving 2684 ART-experienced patients. Regarding efficacy in the ART-naive patients, the virological response rate was not significantly different between DRV/r and the comparator. For the ART-experienced failing patients, the virological response rate was significantly higher with DRV/r than with the comparator (RR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.01-2.08); conversely, no significant differences were found between the treatment-experienced and virologically controlled DRV/r and comparator groups. Regarding safety, the discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AEs) and DRV/r-related serious adverse events (SAEs) did not significantly differ from the rates in the comparator group (RR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.59-1.19 and RR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57-1.05, respectively). Our meta-analysis indicated that DRV/r-based regimens were effective and tolerable for both types of patients, which was consistent with published data.

Topics: Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Here, we report the case of an HIV positive patient under a dual antiretroviral drug regimen with tenofovir disoproxil and darunavir/ritonavir with stable clinical, virological, and immunological response over 126 weeks. Dual antiretroviral therapy has the advantage of reduced toxicity and lower health care costs, treatment failure and fostering drug resistance are perceived risks. Optimal drug combinations and indication criteria for dual treatment remain controversial. Nevertheless, first clinical trials indicate non-inferiority for combinations of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. This case presents the combination of tenofovir disoproxil in combination with a protease inhibitor as a new potential dual treatment regimen.. We performed a systematic literature search and meta-analysis of trials comparing dual to triple ART.. Literature review revealed nine studies in which dual therapy with a protease inhibitor and an NRTI was compared to triple therapy. We performed a meta-analysis of six trials that reported a 48-week follow-up. In treatment-naïve patients as well when ART switch was assessed, there was no difference in the treatment success in patients with dual ART versus triple.. We conclude that dual therapy with a protease inhibitor and NRTI is safe and effective. The use of tenofovir in dual treatment as described in our case needs to be assessed in future clinical trials.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Dual therapy (DT) with a ritonavir-boosted PI (PI/r) plus lamivudine has proven non-inferior (12% margin) to triple therapy (TT) with PI/r plus two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors [N(t)RTIs] in four clinical trials. It remains unclear whether DT is non-inferior based on the US FDA endpoint (virological failure with a margin of 4%) or in specific subgroups.. We performed a systematic search (January 1990 to March 2017) of randomized controlled trials that compared switching of maintenance ART from TT to DT. The principal investigators were contacted and agreed to share study databases. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of DT to TT based on the current FDA endpoint (4% non-inferiority margin for virological failure at week 48). We also analysed whether efficacy was modified by gender, active HCV infection and type of PI. Effect estimates and 95% CIs were calculated using generalized estimating equation-based models.. We found 881 references that yielded eight articles corresponding to four clinical trials (1051 patients). At week 48, 4% of patients on DT versus 3.04% on TT had experienced virological failure (difference 0.9%; 95% CI -1.2% to 3.1%), and 84.7% of patients on DT versus 83.2% on TT had <50 copies of HIV RNA/mL (FDA snapshot algorithm) (difference 1.4%; 95% CI -2.8% to 5.8%). Gender, active HCV infection and type of PI had no effect on differences in treatment efficacy between DT and TT.. DT was non-inferior to TT using both current and past FDA endpoints. The efficacy of DT was not influenced by gender, active HCV infection status, or type of PI.

Topics: Data Interpretation, Statistical; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Viral Load

Atazanavir (ATZ) is a well-tolerated protease inhibitor that can be boosted with ritonavir (r) to treat infection with resistant strains of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy, safety, and metabolic effects of ATZ/r regimen versus commonly used antiretroviral drugs such as lopinavir (LPV) and darunavir (DRV) in HIV-1-infected patients. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL, using relevant keywords. Data were extracted from eligible randomized trials and pooled as risk ratios (RR) or standardized mean differences (SMD) in a meta-analysis model using RevMan software. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (3292 patients) were eligible for the final analysis. After 96 weeks of treatment, the pooled effect estimate did not favor either ATZ/r or LPV/r in terms of virological failure rate (RR 1.11, 95% CI [0.74, 1.66]). However, ATZ/r was marginally superior to LPV/r in terms of increasing the proportion of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/ml (RR 1.09, 95% CI [1.01, 1.17]). The pooled effect estimate did not favor ATZ/r over DRV/r regarding the change in plasma levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, or high-density lipoprotein at 24, 48, and 96 weeks. Moreover, no significant difference was found between the two regimens (ATZ/r and DRV/r) in terms of change in visceral (SMD -0.06, 95%CI [-0.33, 0.21]) or subcutaneous adipose tissue (SMD 0.12, 95% CI [-0.15, 0.39]). The ATZ/r regimen was generally as effective and well-tolerated as the LPV/r regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 patients. Compared to the DRV/r regimen, ATZ/r has no favorable effect on the plasma lipid profile or adipose tissue distribution.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

A case of probable interaction of levothyroxine and ritonavir is presented along with a review of the relevant literature and recommendations on clinical management.. A 37-year-old woman with human immunodeficiency virus infection who had recently undergone thyroidectomy for a benign multinodular goiter presented to a clinic with hypothyroidism (she was also found to be pregnant), and treatment with levothyroxine 75 μg daily was initiated. While receiving antiretroviral therapy (abacavir-lamivudine and lopinavir-ritonavir) during pregnancy, the patient had persistently elevated serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations (up to 125.89 μIU/mL) despite gradual escalation of the levothyroxine dosage to 175 μg daily. An interaction between ritonavir and levothyroxine was suspected, and dolutegravir was substituted for lopinavir-ritonavir. Within 4 months, the TSH concentration had normalized. The daily levothyroxine dose was tapered over a 5-month period and stabilized at 125 μg, and TSH concentrations remained within the normal range over an 18-month follow-up period. Scoring of the case using the Drug Interaction Probability Scale yielded a score of 6 out of 11, indicating a probable interaction between levothyroxine and ritonavir. A literature search identified 4 reported cases of interactions involving levothyroxine and ritonavir.. A potentially serious and underrecognized drug interaction between ritonavir and levothyroxine was observed in a pregnant woman with postthyroidectomy-related hypothyroidism. This case and a review of other cases reported in the literature indicate that higher-than-usual doses of levothyroxine may be required in patients who are taking ritonavir concurrently.

Topics: Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hypothyroidism; Ritonavir; Thyroxine

To describe properties of cobicistat and ritonavir; compare boosting data with atazanavir, darunavir, and elvitegravir; and summarize antiretroviral and comedication interaction studies, with a focus on similarities and differences between ritonavir and cobicistat. Considerations when switching from one booster to another are discussed.. A literature search of MEDLINE was performed (1985 to April 2017) using the following search terms: cobicistat, ritonavir, pharmacokinetic, drug interactions, booster, pharmacokinetic enhancer, HIV, antiretrovirals. Abstracts from conferences, article bibliographies, and product monographs were reviewed.. Relevant English-language studies or those conducted in humans were considered.. Similar exposures of elvitegravir, darunavir, and atazanavir are achieved when combined with cobicistat or ritonavir. Cobicistat may not be as potent a CYP3A4 inhibitor as ritonavir in the presence of a concomitant inducer. Ritonavir induces CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C9, 2C19, and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase, whereas cobicistat does not. Therefore, recommendations for cobicistat with comedications that are extrapolated from studies using ritonavir may not be valid. Pharmacokinetic properties of the boosted antiretroviral can also affect interaction outcome with comedications. Problems can arise when switching patients from ritonavir to cobicistat regimens, particularly with medications that have a narrow therapeutic index such as warfarin.. When assessing and managing potential interactions with ritonavir- or cobicistat-based regimens, clinicians need to be aware of important differences and distinctions between these agents. This is especially important for patients with multiple comorbidities and concomitant medications. Additional monitoring or medication dose adjustments may be needed when switching from one booster to another.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cobicistat; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Quinolones; Ritonavir

Selection of optimal second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) has important clinical and programmatic implications. To inform the 2016 revision of the WHO ART guidelines, we assessed the comparative effectiveness and safety of available second-line ART regimens for adults and adolescents in whom first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens have failed.. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched for randomised controlled trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies that evaluated outcomes in treatment-experienced adults living with HIV who switched ART regimen after failure of a WHO-recommended first-line NNRTI-based regimen. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for reports published from Jan 1, 1996, to Aug 8, 2016, and searched conference abstracts published from Jan 1, 2014, to Aug 8, 2016. Outcomes of interest were viral suppression, mortality, AIDS-defining illnesses or WHO stage 3-4 disease, discontinuations, discontinuations due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. We assessed comparative efficacy and safety in a network meta-analysis, using Bayesian hierarchical models.. We identified 12 papers pertaining to eight studies, including 4778 participants. The network was centred on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus two nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir monotherapy was the only regimen inferior to others. With the lower estimate of the 95% credible interval (CrI) not exceeding the predefined threshold of 15%, evidence at 48 weeks supported the non-inferiority of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus raltegravir to regimens including ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor plus two NRTIs with respect to viral suppression (odds ratio 1·09, 95% CrI 0·88-1·35). Estimated efficacy of ritonavir-boosted darunavir (800 mg once daily) was too imprecise to determine non-inferiority. Overall, regimens did not differ significantly with respect to continuations, AIDS-defining illnesses or WHO stage 3-4 disease, or mortality.. With the exception of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus raltegravir, the evidence base is unable to provide strong support to alternative second-line options to ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor plus two NRTIs, and thus more trials are warranted.. WHO.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Prospective Studies; Raltegravir Potassium; Retrospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir

To assess the impact of various antiretroviral/antiviral regimens in pregnant women living with HIV or hepatitis B virus (HBV).. We performed random effects meta-analysis for HIV-related outcomes and network meta-analysis for HBV outcomes, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to assess quality separately for each outcome.. Embase and Medline to February 2017.. For maternal outcomes, we considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tenofovir-based regimens with those with alternative nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). For child outcomes, we included RCTs and comparative observational studies of tenofovir-based regimens versus alternative NRTIs regimens or, for HBV, placebo.. Ten studies (seven RCTs) met the inclusion criteria for maternal and child outcomes, and an additional 33 studies (12 RCTs) met the inclusion criteria for HBV-specific outcomes. The most common comparison was tenofovir and emtricitabine versus zidovudine and lamivudine. There was no apparent difference between tenofovir-based regimens and alternatives in maternal outcomes, including serious laboratory adverse events (low certainty) and serious clinical adverse events (moderate certainty). There was no difference between NRTIs in vertical transmission of HIV: 1 more per 1000, 8 fewer to 10 more, low certainty; or vertical transmission of HBV: 7 fewer per 1000, 10 fewer to 38 more, moderate certainty. We found moderate certainty evidence that tenofovir/emtricitabine increases the risk of stillbirths and early neonatal mortality (51 more per 1000, 11 more to 150 more) and the risk of early premature delivery at <34 weeks (42 more per 1000, 2 more to 127 more).. Tenofovir/emtricitabine is likely to increase stillbirth/early neonatal death and early premature delivery compared with zidovudine/lamivudine, but certainty is low when they are not coprescribed with lopinavir/ritonavir. Other outcomes are likely similar between antiretrovirals.. PROSPERO CRD42017054392.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Drug Combinations; Emtricitabine; Female; Hepatitis B; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Outcome; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Young Adult; Zidovudine

AbbVie's 3 direct-acting antiviral (3D) regimen containing ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir, and dasabuvir with and without ribavirin is approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. Safe and efficacious antiviral regimens resulting in minimal to no drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with antiretrovirals are needed to ensure that patients coinfected with HCV and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) achieve 12-week sustained virologic response rates similar to HCV-monoinfected patients. Also, the prevalence of injection drug use history is high in both monoinfected and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. This review summarizes results from phase 1 DDI studies of the 3D regimen and antiretrovirals or drugs to treat substance abuse. Data suggest the 3D regimen is a viable option for HIV/HCV-coinfected patients on antiretroviral therapy containing tenofovir/emtricitabine, abacavir/lamivudine, dolutegravir, raltegravir, or atazanavir. HCV-infected patients receiving medications for substance abuse, particularly methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone, can also be treated with the 3D regimen.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Protease Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Substance-Related Disorders; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is a novel respiratory illness firstly reported in Saudi Arabia in 2012. It is caused by a new corona virus, called MERS corona virus (MERS-CoV). Most people who have MERS-CoV infection developed severe acute respiratory illness.. This work is done to determine the clinical characteristics and the outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) admitted patients with confirmed MERS-CoV infection.. This study included 32 laboratory confirmed MERS corona virus infected patients who were admitted into ICU. It included 20 (62.50%) males and 12 (37.50%) females. The mean age was 43.99 ± 13.03 years. Diagnosis was done by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test for corona virus on throat swab, sputum, tracheal aspirate, or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. Clinical characteristics, co-morbidities and outcome were reported for all subjects.. Most MERS corona patients present with fever, cough, dyspnea, sore throat, runny nose and sputum. The presence of abdominal symptoms may indicate bad prognosis. Prolonged duration of symptoms before patients' hospitalization, prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay, bilateral radiological pulmonary infiltrates, and hypoxemic respiratory failure were found to be strong predictors of mortality in such patients. Also, old age, current smoking, smoking severity, presence of associated co-morbidities like obesity, diabetes mellitus, chronic heart diseases, COPD, malignancy, renal failure, renal transplantation and liver cirrhosis are associated with a poor outcome of ICU admitted MERS corona virus infected patients.. Plasma HO-1, ferritin, p21, and NQO1 were all elevated at baseline in CKD participants. Plasma HO-1 and urine NQO1 levels each inversely correlated with eGFR (. SnPP can be safely administered and, after its injection, the resulting changes in plasma HO-1, NQO1, ferritin, and p21 concentrations can provide information as to antioxidant gene responsiveness/reserves in subjects with and without kidney disease.. A Study with RBT-1, in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects with Stage 3-4 Chronic Kidney Disease, NCT0363002 and NCT03893799.. HFNC did not significantly modify work of breathing in healthy subjects. However, a significant reduction in the minute volume was achieved, capillary [Formula: see text] remaining constant, which suggests a reduction in dead-space ventilation with flows > 20 L/min. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02495675).. 3 组患者手术时间、术中显性失血量及术后 1 周血红蛋白下降量比较差异均无统计学意义（. 对于肥胖和超重的膝关节单间室骨关节炎患者，采用 UKA 术后可获满意短中期疗效，远期疗效尚需进一步随访观察。.. Decreased muscle strength was identified at both time points in patients with hEDS/HSD. The evolution of most muscle strength parameters over time did not significantly differ between groups. Future studies should focus on the effectiveness of different types of muscle training strategies in hEDS/HSD patients.. These findings support previous adverse findings of e-cigarette exposure on neurodevelopment in a mouse model and provide substantial evidence of persistent adverse behavioral and neuroimmunological consequences to adult offspring following maternal e-cigarette exposure during pregnancy. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6067.. This RCT directly compares a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen with a standard CROSS regimen in terms of overall survival for patients with locally advanced ESCC. The results of this RCT will provide an answer for the controversy regarding the survival benefits between the two treatment strategies.. NCT04138212, date of registration: October 24, 2019.. Results of current investigation indicated that milk type and post fermentation cooling patterns had a pronounced effect on antioxidant characteristics, fatty acid profile, lipid oxidation and textural characteristics of yoghurt. Buffalo milk based yoghurt had more fat, protein, higher antioxidant capacity and vitamin content. Antioxidant and sensory characteristics of T. If milk is exposed to excessive amounts of light, Vitamins B. The two concentration of ZnO nanoparticles in the ambient air produced two different outcomes. The lower concentration resulted in significant increases in Zn content of the liver while the higher concentration significantly increased Zn in the lungs (p < 0.05). Additionally, at the lower concentration, Zn content was found to be lower in brain tissue (p < 0.05). Using TEM/EDX we detected ZnO nanoparticles inside the cells in the lungs, kidney and liver. Inhaling ZnO NP at the higher concentration increased the levels of mRNA of the following genes in the lungs: Mt2 (2.56 fold), Slc30a1 (1.52 fold) and Slc30a5 (2.34 fold). At the lower ZnO nanoparticle concentration, only Slc30a7 mRNA levels in the lungs were up (1.74 fold). Thus the two air concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles produced distinct effects on the expression of the Zn-homeostasis related genes.. Until adverse health effects of ZnO nanoparticles deposited in organs such as lungs are further investigated and/or ruled out, the exposure to ZnO nanoparticles in aerosols should be avoided or minimised.

Topics: A549 Cells; Acetylmuramyl-Alanyl-Isoglutamine; Acinetobacter baumannii; Acute Lung Injury; Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Adenine; Adenocarcinoma; Adipogenesis; Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Ophthalmic; Adolescent; Adsorption; Adult; Aeromonas hydrophila; Aerosols; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Agriculture; Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Airway Remodeling; Alanine Transaminase; Albuminuria; Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family; Algorithms; AlkB Homolog 2, Alpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase; Alzheimer Disease; Amino Acid Sequence; Ammonia; Ammonium Compounds; Anaerobiosis; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antifungal Agents; Antigens, Bacterial; Antigens, CD; Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Antioxidants; Antitubercular Agents; Antiviral Agents; Apolipoproteins E; Apoptosis; Arabidopsis; Arabidopsis Proteins; Arsenic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Asthma; Atherosclerosis; ATP-Dependent Proteases; Attitude of Health Personnel; Australia; Austria; Autophagy; Axitinib; Bacteria; Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins; Bacterial Proteins; Bacterial Toxins; Bacterial Typing Techniques; Bariatric Surgery; Base Composition; Bayes Theorem; Benzoxazoles; Benzylamines; beta Catenin; Betacoronavirus; Betula; Binding Sites; Biological Availability; Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis; Biomarkers; Biomarkers, Tumor; Biopsy; Bioreactors; Biosensing Techniques; Birth Weight; Blindness; Blood Chemical Analysis; Blood Gas Analysis; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Blood-Brain Barrier; Blotting, Western; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Bone and Bones; Bone Density; Bone Resorption; Borates; Brain; Brain Infarction; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Brain Neoplasms; Breakfast; Breast Milk Expression; Breast Neoplasms; Bronchi; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Buffaloes; Cadherins; Calcification, Physiologic; Calcium Compounds; Calcium, Dietary; Cannula; Caprolactam; Carbon; Carbon Dioxide; Carboplatin; Carcinogenesis; Carcinoma, Ductal; Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cardiovascular Diseases; Carps; Carrageenan; Case-Control Studies; Catalysis; Catalytic Domain; Cattle; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Adhesion; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Death; Cell Differentiation; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Cell Nucleus; Cell Phone Use; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Cell Transformation, Viral; Cells, Cultured; Cellulose; Chemical Phenomena; Chemoradiotherapy; Child; Child Development; Child, Preschool; China; Chitosan; Chlorocebus aethiops; Cholecalciferol; Chromatography, Liquid; Circadian Clocks; Circadian Rhythm; Circular Dichroism; Cisplatin; Citric Acid; Clinical Competence; Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Coculture Techniques; Cohort Studies; Cold Temperature; Colitis; Collagen Type I; Collagen Type I, alpha 1 Chain; Collagen Type XI; Color; Connective Tissue Diseases; Copper; Coronary Angiography; Coronavirus 3C Proteases; Coronavirus Infections; Cost of Illness; Counselors; COVID-19; COVID-19 Testing; Creatine Kinase; Creatinine; Cross-Over Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cryoelectron Microscopy; Cryosurgery; Crystallography, X-Ray; Cues; Cultural Competency; Cultural Diversity; Curriculum; Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21; Cycloparaffins; Cysteine Endopeptidases; Cytokines; Cytoplasm; Cytoprotection; Databases, Factual; Denitrification; Deoxycytidine; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diagnosis, Differential; Diatoms; Diet; Diet, High-Fat; Dietary Exposure; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Diketopiperazines; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Disease Models, Animal; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; DNA; DNA Damage; DNA Glycosylases; DNA Repair; DNA-Binding Proteins; DNA, Bacterial; DNA, Viral; Docetaxel; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Down-Regulation; Doxorubicin; Drosophila; Drosophila melanogaster; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Liberation; Drug Repositioning; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Edema; Edible Grain; Education, Graduate; Education, Medical, Graduate; Education, Pharmacy; Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome; Electron Transport Complex III; Electron Transport Complex IV; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems; Emergency Service, Hospital; Empathy; Emulsions; Endothelial Cells; Endurance Training; Energy Intake; Enterovirus A, Human; Environment; Environmental Monitoring; Enzyme Assays; Enzyme Inhibitors; Epithelial Cells; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Epoxide Hydrolases; Epoxy Compounds; Erythrocyte Count; Erythrocytes; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Escherichia coli Proteins; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Esophagectomy; Estrogens; Etanercept; Ethiopia; Ethnicity; Ethylenes; Exanthema; Exercise; Exercise Test; Exercise Tolerance; Extracellular Matrix; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Eye Infections, Fungal; False Negative Reactions; Fatty Acids; Fecal Microbiota Transplantation; Feces; Female; Femur Neck; Fermentation; Ferritins; Fetal Development; Fibroblast Growth Factor-23; Fibroblast Growth Factors; Fibroblasts; Fibroins; Fish Proteins; Flavanones; Flavonoids; Focus Groups; Follow-Up Studies; Food Handling; Food Supply; Food, Formulated; Forced Expiratory Volume; Forests; Fractures, Bone; Fruit and Vegetable Juices; Fusobacteria; G1 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Gamma Rays; Gastrectomy; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors; Gefitinib; Gels; Gemcitabine; Gene Amplification; Gene Expression; Gene Expression Regulation; Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Gene Expression Regulation, Plant; Gene Knockdown Techniques; Gene-Environment Interaction; Genotype; Germany; Glioma; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glucagon; Glucocorticoids; Glycemic Control; Glycerol; Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta; Glycolipids; Glycolysis; Goblet Cells; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Graphite; Greenhouse Effect; Guanidines; Haemophilus influenzae; HCT116 Cells; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Health Personnel; Health Services Accessibility; Health Services Needs and Demand; Health Status Disparities; Healthy Volunteers; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Heart Transplantation; Heart-Assist Devices; HEK293 Cells; Heme; Heme Oxygenase-1; Hemolysis; Hemorrhage; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B e Antigens; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Hepatocytes; Hexoses; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Hippo Signaling Pathway; Histamine; Histamine Agonists; Histidine; Histone Deacetylase 2; HIV Infections; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Homebound Persons; Homeodomain Proteins; Homosexuality, Male; Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing; HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins; Humans; Hyaluronan Receptors; Hydrogen; Hydrogen Peroxide; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hydrolysis; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Hypoxia; Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Imatinib Mesylate; Immunotherapy; Implementation Science; Incidence; INDEL Mutation; Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells; Industrial Waste; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Inflammation; Inflammation Mediators; Infliximab; Infusions, Intravenous; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Injections; Insecticides; Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 5; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Interleukin-1; Interleukin-17; Interleukin-8; Internship and Residency; Intestines; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Ion Transport; Iridaceae; Iridoid Glucosides; Islets of Langerhans Transplantation; Isodon; Isoflurane; Isotopes; Italy; Joint Instability; Ketamine; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Function Tests; Kidney Neoplasms; Kinetics; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Knee Joint; Kruppel-Like Factor 4; Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors; Lactate Dehydrogenase 5; Laparoscopy; Laser Therapy; Lasers, Semiconductor; Lasers, Solid-State; Laurates; Lead; Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Light; Lipid Peroxidation; Lipopolysaccharides; Liposomes; Liver; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Locomotion; Longitudinal Studies; Lopinavir; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Lubricants; Lung; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphocyte Activation; Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Lysosomes; Macrophages; Male; Manganese Compounds; MAP Kinase Kinase 4; Mass Screening; Maternal Health; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Melanoma, Experimental; Memantine; Membrane Glycoproteins; Membrane Proteins; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Metal Nanoparticles; Metalloendopeptidases; Metalloporphyrins; Methadone; Methane; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Mexico; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Inbred ICR; Mice, Knockout; Mice, Nude; Mice, SCID; Mice, Transgenic; Microarray Analysis; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Microbiota; Micronutrients; MicroRNAs; Microscopy, Confocal; Microsomes, Liver; Middle Aged; Milk; Milk, Human; Minority Groups; Mitochondria; Mitochondrial Membranes; Mitochondrial Proteins; Models, Animal; Models, Molecular; Molecular Conformation; Molecular Docking Simulation; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Molecular Epidemiology; Molecular Structure; Molecular Weight; Multilocus Sequence Typing; Multimodal Imaging; Muscle Strength; Muscle, Skeletal; Muscular Diseases; Mutation; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Myocardial Stunning; Myristates; NAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone); Nanocomposites; Nanogels; Nanoparticles; Nanotechnology; Naphthalenes; Nasal Cavity; National Health Programs; Necrosis; Needs Assessment; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neonicotinoids; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Proteins; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasm Transplantation; Neoplasms; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Netherlands; Neuroblastoma; Neuroprotective Agents; Neutrophils; NF-kappa B; NFATC Transcription Factors; Nicotiana; Nicotine; Nitrates; Nitrification; Nitrites; Nitro Compounds; Nitrogen; Nitrogen Dioxide; North Carolina; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular; Nuclear Proteins; Nucleic Acid Hybridization; Nucleosomes; Nutrients; Obesity; Obesity, Morbid; Oceans and Seas; Oncogene Protein v-akt; Oncogenes; Oocytes; Open Reading Frames; Osteoclasts; Osteogenesis; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Outpatients; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovariectomy; Overweight; Oxazines; Oxidants; Oxidation-Reduction; Oxidative Stress; Oxides; Oxidoreductases; Oxygen; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Oxygenators, Membrane; Ozone; Paclitaxel; Paenibacillus; Pain Measurement; Palliative Care; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pandemics; Parasympathetic Nervous System; Particulate Matter; Pasteurization; Patient Preference; Patient Satisfaction; Pediatric Obesity; Permeability; Peroxiredoxins; Peroxynitrous Acid; Pharmaceutical Services; Pharmacists; Pharmacy; Phaseolus; Phenotype; Phoeniceae; Phosphates; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Phospholipid Transfer Proteins; Phospholipids; Phosphorus; Phosphorylation; Photoperiod; Photosynthesis; Phylogeny; Physical Endurance; Physicians; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide; Plant Extracts; Plant Leaves; Plant Proteins; Plant Roots; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Pneumonia; Pneumonia, Viral; Point-of-Care Testing; Polyethylene Glycols; Polymers; Polysorbates; Pore Forming Cytotoxic Proteins; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Positron-Emission Tomography; Postprandial Period; Poverty; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Prediabetic State; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy, High-Risk; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Pressure; Prevalence; Primary Graft Dysfunction; Primary Health Care; Professional Role; Professionalism; Prognosis; Progression-Free Survival; Prolactin; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Proof of Concept Study; Proportional Hazards Models; Propylene Glycol; Prospective Studies; Prostate; Protein Binding; Protein Biosynthesis; Protein Isoforms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Phosphatase 2; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Protein Structure, Tertiary; Protein Transport; Proteoglycans; Proteome; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Proton Pumps; Protons; Protoporphyrins; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas fluorescens; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pulmonary Gas Exchange; Pulmonary Veins; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Qualitative Research; Quinoxalines; Rabbits; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Histamine H3; Receptors, Immunologic; Receptors, Transferrin; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; Reference Values; Referral and Consultation; Regional Blood Flow; Registries; Regulon; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Reperfusion Injury; Repressor Proteins; Reproducibility of Results; Republic of Korea; Research Design; Resistance Training; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Respiratory Insufficiency; Resuscitation; Retinal Dehydrogenase; Retreatment; Retrospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Rhinitis, Allergic; Ribosomal Proteins; Ribosomes; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Rivers; RNA Interference; RNA-Seq; RNA, Messenger; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; RNA, Small Interfering; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Rural Population; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; Salivary Ducts; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; San Francisco; SARS-CoV-2; Satiation; Satiety Response; Schools; Schools, Pharmacy; Seasons; Seawater; Selection, Genetic; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Serine-Threonine Kinase 3; Sewage; Sheep; Sheep, Domestic; Shock, Hemorrhagic; Signal Transduction; Silver; Silymarin; Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography; Sirolimus; Sirtuin 1; Skin; Skin Neoplasms; Skin Physiological Phenomena; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Social Class; Social Participation; Social Support; Soil; Soil Microbiology; Solutions; Somatomedins; Soot; Specimen Handling; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Spectrum Analysis; Spinal Fractures; Spirometry; Staphylococcus aureus; STAT1 Transcription Factor; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Streptomyces coelicolor; Stress, Psychological; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Structure-Activity Relationship; Students, Medical; Students, Pharmacy; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; Sulfur Dioxide; Surface Properties; Surface-Active Agents; Surveys and Questionnaires; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Survivin; Sweden; Swine; Swine, Miniature; Sympathetic Nervous System; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Talaromyces; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; tau Proteins; Telemedicine; Telomerase; Telomere; Telomere Homeostasis; Temperature; Terminally Ill; Th1 Cells; Thiamethoxam; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thioredoxin Reductase 1; Thrombosis; Thulium; Thyroid Cancer, Papillary; Thyroid Carcinoma, Anaplastic; Thyroid Neoplasms; Time Factors; Titanium; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Transcription Factor AP-1; Transcription Factors; Transcription, Genetic; Transcriptional Activation; Transcriptome; Transforming Growth Factor beta1; Transistors, Electronic; Translational Research, Biomedical; Transplantation Tolerance; Transplantation, Homologous; Transportation; Treatment Outcome; Tretinoin; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary; Tubulin Modulators; Tumor Microenvironment; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Twins; Ultrasonic Therapy; Ultrasonography; Ultraviolet Rays; United States; Up-Regulation; Uranium; Urethra; Urinary Bladder; Urodynamics; Uromodulin; Uveitis; Vasoconstrictor Agents; Ventricular Function, Left; Vero Cells; Vesicular Transport Proteins; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Visual Acuity; Vital Capacity; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency; Vitamin K 2; Vitamins; Volatilization; Voriconazole; Waiting Lists; Waste Disposal, Fluid; Wastewater; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Whole Genome Sequencing; Wine; Wnt Signaling Pathway; Wound Healing; Wounds and Injuries; WW Domains; X-linked Nuclear Protein; X-Ray Diffraction; Xanthines; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays; YAP-Signaling Proteins; Yogurt; Young Adult; Zebrafish; Zebrafish Proteins; Ziziphus

The aim of this analysis was to review the evidence and update a meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety results from randomized controlled trials of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) monotherapy.. A PubMed/EMBASE search was conducted to find randomized trials of PI/r monotherapy vs. triple therapy in patients with HIV-1 RNA suppression at baseline (<50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL). Rates of virological suppression were analysed using switch-equals-failure and intensification-included endpoints [intent-to-treat (ITT)]. The rate of treatment-emergent resistance mutations, neurocognitive function endpoints, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HIV-1 RNA were also analysed by treatment arm.. There were 2303 patients from 13 different randomized clinical trials of darunavir/r monotherapy (n = 784: MONET, MONOI, Monarch and PROTEA), lopinavir/r monotherapy (n = 829: OK pilot, OK-04, KalMo, KALESOLO, KRETA, MOST and DREAM), atazanavir/r monotherapy (n = 103: MODAT), or all three (n = 587: PIVOT). HIV-1 RNA plasma suppression was lower in the PI/r monotherapy arm compared with the triple therapy arm in the switch-equals-failure analysis [difference -8.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -11.9 to -4.8%], but not when intensification was included (difference 0.5%; 95% CI -2.5 to 3.6%). Rates of resistance mutations were similar between arms, as was overall neurocognitive function.. PI/r monotherapy showed a higher risk of plasma HIV-1 RNA elevations. However, there was no increased risk of treatment-emergent drug resistance, neurocognitive endpoints did not differ, and HIV-1 RNA suppression rates after intensification were similar between PI/r monotherapy and triple therapy.

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; Cerebrospinal Fluid; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome

Since the advent of combination antiretroviral therapy to successfully treat HIV infection, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) have become a significant problem as many antiretrovirals (ARVs) are metabolized in the liver. Antituberculous therapy traditionally includes rifamycins, particularly rifampicin. Rifabutin (RBT) has shown similar efficacy as rifampicin but induces CYP3A4 to a lesser degree and is less likely to have DDIs with ARVs. We identified 14 DDI pharmacokinetic studies on HIV monoinfected and HIV-tuberculosis coinfected individuals, and the remaining studies were healthy volunteer studies. Although RBT may be coadministered with most nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, identifying the optimal dose with ritonavir-boosted or cobicistat-boosted protease inhibitors is challenging because of concern about adverse effects with increased RBT exposure. Limited healthy volunteer studies on other ARV drug classes and RBT suggest that dose modification may be unnecessary. The paucity of data assessing clinical tuberculosis endpoints concurrently with RBT and ARV pharmacokinetics limits evidence-based recommendations on the optimal dose of RBT within available ARV drug classes.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Coinfection; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Rifabutin; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

A "single time point" strategy for predicting the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for lopinavir in patients receiving ritonavir-boosted lopinavir therapy was investigated.. Linear regression equations describing the relationships of lopinavir peak and trough concentrations to lopinavir AUC values were established using pharmacokinetic data from published studies of patients or healthy subjects receiving lopinavir and ritonavir at standard dosages. The resulting "trough-AUC model" and "peak-AUC model" were used to predict lopinavir AUC values in the evaluated study populations (total n = 479); those values were then compared with reported AUC values.. Lopinavir peak or trough concentrations were strongly correlated with lopinavir AUC values (r = 0.9947 and r = 0.9541, respectively). For about 94% of calculations using the peak-AUC model and 87% of calculations using the trough-AUC model, differences between predicted and observed AUC values were in the range of 0.76-1.5 fold; the associated r values were 0.9514 (p < 0.001) and 0.9345 (p < 0.001), respectively. The mean absolute predictive error was less than 6% with the use of either the peak-AUC model or the trough-AUC model, with corresponding values for root-mean-square error of 17.6% and 23.5%, respectively.. Equations incorporating lopinavir peak and trough concentrations were found to satisfactorily predict lopinavir AUC values in data sets describing patients receiving lopinavir with ritonavir boosting. Variability in predictions was higher with use of the trough-AUC model.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Forecasting; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Linear Models; Lopinavir; Ritonavir

Patients with schizophrenia are eight times more likely than healthy individuals to become infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (hiv). Although in vitro studies provide some data on the interaction between antipsychotics and retroviral agents, there is a lack of in vitro data on this subject. We describe the case of a 35-year-old patient who suffered from schizophrenia, polydrug abuse and an hiv infection and who also had treatment-resistant psychosis. An interaction between the antiretroviral drug ritonavir and the antipsychotic olanzapine turned out to be the cause of the treatment resistance. As far as we know, this is the first report of such a clinically relevant interaction. We present a review of the current literature on this type of interaction.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Psychoses, Substance-Induced; Ritonavir; Schizophrenia

Previous studies suggest that nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) cause faster virologic suppression, while ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r) recover more CD4 cells. However, individual trials have not been powered to compare clinical outcomes.. We searched databases to identify randomized trials that compared NNRTI- vs PI/r-based initial therapy. A metaanalysis calculated risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs), as appropriate. Primary outcome was death or progression to AIDS. Secondary outcomes were death, progression to AIDS, and treatment discontinuation. We calculated RR of virologic suppression and MD for an increase in CD4 cells at week 48.. We included 29 trials with 9047 participants. Death or progression to AIDS occurred in 226 participants in the NNRTI arm and in 221 in the PI/r arm (RR, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, .87-1.22; 12 trials; n = 3825), death in 205 participants in the NNRTI arm vs 198 in the PI/r arm (1.04; 0.86-1.25; 22 trials; n = 8311), and progression to AIDS in 140 participants in the NNRTI arm vs 144 in the PI/r arm (1.00; 0.80-1.25; 13 trials; n = 4740). Overall treatment discontinuation (1.12; 0.93-1.35; 24 trials; n = 8249) and from toxicity (1.21; 0.87-1.68; 21 trials; n = 6195) were comparable, but discontinuation due to virologic failure was more common with NNRTI (1.58; 0.91-2.74; 17 trials; n = 5371). At week 48, there was no difference between NNRTI and PI/r in virologic suppression (RR, 1.03; 0.98-1.09) or CD4(+) recovery (MD, -4.7 cells; -14.2 to 4.8).. We found no difference in clinical and viro-immunologic outcomes between NNRTI- and PI/r-based therapy.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir

Current antiretrovirals (ARVs) have demonstrated the ability to prolong the life of an HIV infected individual via suppression of the virus and subsequent restoration of immune function. Despite significant advancement, there remains an opportunity for improvement. One ARV that attempts to fill global HIV therapeutic needs by balancing convenience, safety, and efficacy is elvitegravir (EVG). Areas covered: Using MEDLINE/PubMed, a literature search was conducted for published articles on the safety and efficacy of EVG in the treatment of HIV infection. Expert opinion: EVG offers clinicians a convenient choice for HIV-positive patients that is safe and effective for both treatment-naïve and experienced patients, as well as an option for regimen simplification in virologically suppressed patients. EVG is conveniently co-formulated in fixed dose combination tablets to be taken once daily with food. EVG does not require dose adjustment for patients with severe renal impairment or mild to moderate liver disease. Importantly, EVG requires co-administration with a pharmacokinetic enhancer (i.e., ritonavir or cobicistat) in order to achieve therapeutic levels and facilitate once daily dosing. As a consequence, clinicians must carefully review concomitant medications and navigate potential drug-drug interactions mediated through potent inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A enzymes by ritonavir and cobicistat.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cobicistat; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Quinolones; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to compare an in-person, group-based behavioral weight loss intervention to technology-based interventions in adults with obesity.. Adults (. Findings provide initial information on the use of technology-based interventions that include wearable devices combined with brief monthly telephone calls for weight loss in adults with obesity.. A highly stable amino-coordinated metal-organic framework ZJU-198 has been synthesized and structurally characterized, exhibiting high CO. The use of statins in SLE reduced the serum lipid and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, which suggests a role for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Statins did not affect the SLEDAI score, and therefore their use for modifying SLE disease activity levels is not presently supported.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Air Pollutants; Alkynes; Alleles; Animals; Anthracenes; Anthraquinones; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Black or African American; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; C-Reactive Protein; Calcium, Dietary; Capsid Proteins; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated; Cardiovascular Diseases; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol; Collagen Type I; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Echocardiography; Emtricitabine; Epitopes; Female; Femur Neck; Gene Expression Profiling; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Hepatitis, Viral, Animal; Hip Joint; HIV Infections; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Immunization; Inflammation Mediators; Lipoproteins, LDL; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Nitrates; Osteocalcin; Oxidation-Reduction; Parathyroid Hormone; Parvovirus B19, Human; Peptides; Phenotype; Pilot Projects; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sodium Chloride; Tenofovir; Transcriptome; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Vaccines; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vitamin D; Young Adult

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Darunavir; Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Cobicistat; Darunavir; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Ritonavir; Viral Load

Topics: Cobicistat; Darunavir; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Ritonavir

Long-term use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) to treat HIV infection has been associated with dyslipidemia and metabolic and cardiovascular complications. Available options for patients at risk of cardiovascular disease include antiretroviral drugs with improved lipid profiles. Dolutegravir is one of a new generation of HIV integrase inhibitors recently incorporated into the US Department of Health and Human Services, German, Spanish, and Italian HIV treatment guidelines as a preferred first-line third agent in combination with dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone therapies. To understand the lipid profile of dolutegravir in the context of combination ART, we analyzed the lipid outcomes at 48 weeks in ART-naive participants in four phase IIb-IIIb clinical trials.. Variables included in this analysis were total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HDL-C), TC/HDL ratio, and triglycerides at baseline and week 48.. In a comparative analysis, dolutegravir demonstrated a broadly neutral effect on lipids versus efavirenz or ritonavir-boosted darunavir; in both comparisons, patients taking dolutegravir exhibited smaller increases in TC, LDL-C, and triglyceride levels. In comparison with raltegravir, dolutegravir exhibited a similar lipid profile, including small increases in TC, LDL-C, and triglyceride levels for both agents. In the pooled dolutegravir analysis, minimal increases in LDL-C and triglycerides were observed but mean values at 48 weeks remained below National Cholesterol Education Program target levels. HDL-C levels increased at 48 weeks, and the mean TC/HDL-C ratio was 0.6 at 48 weeks; these values are associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease.. Together, these data show that dolutegravir has a safer lipid profile in combination ART and provides an important treatment option for older patients who may have other risk factors for metabolic syndrome or cardiovascular disease.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; Humans; Lipids; Male; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is the first ritonavir-boosted protease-inhibitor used in second-line anti-retroviral treatment (ART) in resource-limited regions. To evaluate the efficacy and safety outcomes of LPV/r in treatment-naïve and -experienced HIV-infected adults and pregnant women, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ten cohorts from 8 articles involving 2,584 ART-naïve patients, 5 cohorts from 4 articles involving 1,124 ART-experienced patients, and 8 cohorts from 7 articles involving 2,191 pregnant women were selected for the meta-analyses. For ART-naïve patients, the virologic response rate (72.3%) of LPV/r combined with tenofovir (TDF) plus lamivudine/emtricitabine (3TC/FTC) arms was significantly greater than that of LPV/r plus non-TDF-FTC arms (65.5%, p = 0.047). For ART-experienced patients, the use of LPV/r revealed a 55.7% probability of virologic success. The incidence of abnormal total cholesterol (6.9%) for ART-experienced patients was significantly lower than that for ART-naïve patients (13.1%, p < 0.001). The use of LPV/r in pregnant women revealed a mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) rate of 1.1%, preterm birth rate of 13.2%, and low birth weight rate of 16.2%. Our meta-analysis indicated that LPV/r was an efficacious regimen for ART-naïve patients and was more tolerable for ART-experienced patients. LPV/r also displayed a significant effect in preventing MTCT.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Birth Weight; Cholesterol; Databases, Factual; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lopinavir; Pregnancy; Premature Birth; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Efavirenz, a non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) is one of the most commonly prescribed antiretroviral drugs. The present article provides a systematic overview and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing efavirenz and other active drugs currently recommended for treatment of HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive patients. Electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Trip Database) were searched up till 23 December 2013 for randomized controlled clinical trials published as a peer-reviewed papers, and concerning efavirenz-based regimens used as initial treatment for HIV infection. Thirty-four studies were included in the systematic review, while twenty-six trials were suitable for the meta-analysis. Efavirenz was compared with drugs from four different classes: NNRTIs other than efavirenz (nevirapine or rilpivirine), integrase strand transfer inhibitors (InSTIs), ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (bPI) and chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 (CCR5) antagonists (maraviroc), all of them were added to the background regimen. Results of the current meta-analysis showed that efavirenz-based regimens were equally effective as other recommended regimens based on NNRTI, ritonavir-boosted PI or CCR5 antagonist in terms of efficacy outcomes (disease progression and/or death, plasma viral HIV RNA <50 copies/ml) while statistically significant more patients treated with InSTI achieved plasma viral load <50 copies/ml at week 48. In comparison with both InSTI-based and CCR5-based therapy, efavirenz-based treatment was associated with a higher risk of therapy discontinuation due to adverse events. However, comparisons of efevirenz-based treatment with InSTI-based and CCR5-based therapy were based on a limited number of trials, therefore, conclusions from these two comparisons must be confirmed in further reliable randomized controlled studies. Results of our meta-analysis support the present clinical guidelines for antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected patients, in which efavirenz is one of the most preferred regimens in the analyzed population. Beneficial safety profile of InSTI-based and CCR5-based therapy over efavirenz-based treatment needs further studies.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, CCR5; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

A current focus in HIV management is improving adherence by minimizing pill burden with convenient formulations, including fixed-dose combinations (FDCs). Darunavir, a HIV protease inhibitor, co-administered with low-dose ritonavir (800/100 mg once daily), is recommended in guidelines in combination with other antiretrovirals for HIV patients with no darunavir resistance-associated mutations. Cobicistat is an alternative agent to ritonavir for boosting plasma drug levels of darunavir among other antiretrovirals. Cobicistat is a more specific cytochrome P450 3A inhibitor than ritonavir without enzyme-inducing properties. This review describes the differing effects of cobicistat and ritonavir on metabolic enzymes, which explains their differing drug-drug interactions, and summarizes some of the studied drug-drug interactions for cobicistat. It also outlines the clinical development and data for a once-daily darunavir/cobicistat FDC. This FDC thus allows for a once-daily treatment regimen (including background antiretrovirals) with reduced pill burden.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Cobicistat; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

The choice of preferred regimens for human immunodeficiency virus postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) has evolved over the last 2 decades as more data have become available regarding the safety and tolerability of newer antiretroviral drugs. We undertook a systematic review to assess the safety and efficacy of antiretroviral options for PEP to inform the World Health Organization guideline revision process.. Four databases were searched up to 1 June 2014 for studies reporting outcomes associated with specific PEP regimens. Data on PEP completion and discontinuation due to adverse events was extracted and pooled estimates were obtained using random-effects meta-analyses.. Fifteen studies (1830 PEP initiations) provided evaluable information on 2-drug regimens (zidovudine [ZDV]- or tenofovir [TDF]-based regimens), and 10 studies (1755 initiations) provided evaluable information on the third drug, which was usually a protease inhibitor. The overall quality of the evidence was rated as very low. For the 2-drug regimen, PEP completion rates were 78.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.1%-90.7%) for people receiving a TDF-based regimen and 58.8% (95% CI, 47.2%-70.4%) for a ZDV-based regimen; the rate of PEP discontinuation due to an adverse event was lower among people taking TDF-based PEP (0.3%; 95% CI, 0%-1.1%) vs a ZDV-based regimen (3.2%; 95% CI, 1.5%-4.9%). For the 3-drug comparison, PEP completion rates were highest for the TDF-based regimens (TDF+emtricitabine [FTC]+lopinavir/ritonavir [LPV/r], 71.1%; 95% CI, 43.6%-98.6%; TDF+FTC+raltegravir [RAL], 74.7%; 95% CI, 41.4%-100%; TDF+FTC+ boosted darunavir [DRV/r], 93.9%; 95% CI, 90.2%-97.7%) and lowest for ZDV+ lamivudine [3TC]+LPV/r (59.1%; 95% CI, 36.2%-82.0%). Discontinuations due to adverse drug reactions were lowest for TDF+FTC+RAL (1.9%; 95% CI, 0%-3.8%) and highest for ZDV+3TC+boosted atazanavir (21.2%; 95% CI, 13.5%-30.0%).. The findings of this review provide evidence supporting the use of coformulated TDF and 3TC/FTC as preferred backbone drugs for PEP. Choice of third drug will depend on setting; for resource-limited settings, LPV/r is a reasonable choice, pending the improved availability of better-tolerated drugs with less potential for drug-drug interactions.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Post-Exposure Prophylaxis; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; World Health Organization

This systematic review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of antiretroviral options for postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). Recognizing the limited data on the safety and efficacy of antiretroviral drugs for PEP in children, this review was extended to include consideration of data on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treatment of infants and children living with human immunodeficiency virus.. The PEP literature was assessed to identify studies reporting safety and completion rates for children given PEP, and this information was complemented by safety and efficacy data for drugs used in antiretroviral therapy. The proportion of patients experiencing each outcome was calculated and data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.. Three prospective cohort studies reported outcomes of children given zidovudine (ZDV) plus lamivudine (3TC) as a 2-drug PEP regimen. The proportion of children completing the full 28-day course of PEP was 64.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.2%-86.8%), whereas the proportion discontinuing due to adverse events was 4.5% (95% CI, .4%-8.6%). One randomized trial compared abacavir (ABC) plus lamivudine (3TC) and ZDV+3TC as part of a dual or triple first-line antiretroviral therapy regimen; this study showed better efficacy in the ABC-containing combinations and no difference in the time to first serious adverse event. Three randomized trials compared lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) to nevirapine (NVP) for antiretroviral therapy and showed a lower risk of treatment discontinuations associated with LPV/r vs NVP (hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, .41-.75]) but no difference in drug-related adverse events. The overall quality of the evidence was rated as very low.. This review supports ZDV+3TC+LPV/r as the preferred 3-drug regimen for PEP in children.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Nevirapine; Post-Exposure Prophylaxis; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Zidovudine

A fixed-dose tablet comprising ombitasvir (an NS5A replication complex inhibitor), paritaprevir (an NS3/4A protease inhibitor) and ritonavir (a cytochrome P450 inhibitor) taken in combination with dasabuvir (an NS5B polymerase inhibitor) is indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection in several countries, including the USA (copackaged as Viekira Pak(™)) and those of the EU (Viekirax(®) and Exviera(®)). In phase II and III trials, this interferon-free regimen, taken ± ribavirin, provided high rates of sustained virological response 12 weeks post-treatment in adults with chronic HCV genotype 1a or 1b infection, including those with compensated cirrhosis, liver transplants or HIV-1 co-infection. The regimen was generally well tolerated, with nausea, insomnia, asthenia, pruritus, other skin reactions and fatigue being among the most common tolerability issues. Thus, ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir is an effective interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral regimen for use ± ribavirin in a broad range of adults chronically infected with HCV genotype 1.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genotype; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Transplantation; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

Abacavir is one of the recommended nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for the treatment of HIV infections among children and adolescents. However, there are concerns that the antiviral efficacy of abacavir might be low when compared to other NRTIs especially among children. There are also concerns that abacavir use may lead to serious adverse events such as hypersensitivity reactions and has potential predisposition to developing cardiovascular diseases. We searched four electronic databases, four conference proceedings and two clinical trial registries in August 2014, without language restrictions. Experimental and observational studies with control groups that examined the efficacy and safety of abacavir-containing regimens in comparison with other NRTIs as first-line treatment for HIV-infected children and adolescents aged between one month and eighteen years were eligible. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies using a pre-specified, standardised data extraction form and validated risk of bias tools. We also assessed the quality of evidence per outcome with the GRADE tool.. We included two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and two analytical cohort studies with a total of 10,595 participants. Among the RCTs we detected no difference in virologic suppression after a mean duration of 48 weeks between abacavir- and stavudine-containing regimens (2 trials; n = 326: RR 1.28; 95 % CI 0.67-2.42) with significant heterogeneity (P = 0.02; I(2) = 81 %). We also found no significant differences between the two groups for adverse events and death. After five years of follow-up, virologic suppression improved with abacavir (1 trial; n = 69: RR 1.96; 95 % CI 1.11-3.44). For cohort studies, we detected that the virologic suppression activity of abacavir was less effective than stavudine in both the lopinavir/ritonavir (1 study, n = 2165: RR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.67-0.92) and efavirenz sub-groups (1 study, n = 3204: RR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.67-0.92) respectively. The quality of evidence from RCTs was moderate for virologic suppression but low for death and adverse events, while that of cohort studies was low for all three these outcomes.. Available evidence showed little or no difference between abacavir-containing regimen and other NRTIs regarding efficacy and safety when given to children and adolescents as a first-line antiretroviral therapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Ritonavir; Stavudine

To review the pharmacology, safety, and efficacy of dolutegravir, an integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (INSTI), and to discuss its role in the treatment of HIV-1-infected patients.. PubMed articles indexed through August 2013 were identified using the search terms S/GSK1349572, dolutegravir, and integrase inhibitor. Information was also identified from the package insert, cited publication references, professional meeting abstracts, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry.. English language articleswere selected for evaluation, with preference given to safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic studies conducted in HIV-1-infected patients.. Dolutegravir is a new INSTI approved for combination treatment in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescent children. Four phase 3 studies provide the basis for current labeling in antiretroviral-naïve and antiretroviral-experienced adults. Results from these studies demonstrate that dolutegravir is noninferior in efficacy to raltegravir in antiretroviral-naïve patients and superior in antiretroviral-experienced patients. Superiority to efavirenz and darunavir/ritonavir was also demonstrated in antiretroviral-naïve patients. Dolutegravir is well tolerated, exhibits low potential for drug-drug interactions, and has a long serum half-life, allowing it to be administered once-daily in patients without preexisting INSTI resistance. Twice-daily administration is recommended in patients with known or suspected resistance mutations to first-generation INSTIs. Mild elevations in serum creatinine occur following dolutegravir initiation from inhibition of renal organic cation transporter 2 but do not reflect changes in glomerular filtration.. Dolutegravir is the first second-generation INSTI and exhibits several advantages over current integrase inhibitors and other preferred antiretrovirals. Long-term efficacy and safety are needed to define dolutegravir's role in treatment.

Topics: Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Half-Life; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir

Treatment simplification involving induction with a ritonavir (RTV)-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) replaced by a nonboosted PI (i.e. atazanavir) has been shown to be a viable option for long-term antiretroviral therapy. To evaluate the clinical evidence for this approach, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating efficacy and safety in patients with established virological suppression.. Several databases were searched without limits on time or language. Searches of conferences were also conducted. RCTs were included if they compared a PI/RTV regimen to unboosted atazanavir, after induction with PI/RTV. The meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model for the proportion achieving virological suppression (i.e. HIV RNA < 50 and <400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL), CD4 cell counts, lipid levels and liver function tests. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as risk ratios (RRs) and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs).. Five studies (n = 1249) met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in efficacy (i.e. HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL) between PI/RTV and unboosted atazanavir [RR = 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99 to 1.10], with no heterogeneity. Findings were similar in a subanalysis of studies where atazanavir/RTV was the only PI/RTV used during induction. Additional efficacy results support these findings. A significant reduction in total cholesterol (P < 0.00001), triglycerides (P = 0.0002), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (P = 0.009) and hyperbilirubinaemia (P = 0.02) was observed with unboosted atazanavir vs. PI/RTV.. The meta-analysis demonstrated that switching patients with virological suppression from an RTV-boosted PI to unboosted atazanavir leads to improvements in safety (i.e. blood parameter abnormalities) without sacrificing virological efficacy.

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Oligopeptides; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir

Despite increasing numbers of women with HIV worldwide, females are under-represented in clinical trials of antiretrovirals and literature addressing gender differences in clinical outcomes, treatment discontinuation, adverse events and adherence are limited. Most recommendations specific to women in current guidelines relate to pregnant women or women wishing to become pregnant. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide clinicians with an overview of available literature regarding the use of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) in women.. The online databases PubMed and EMBASE, HIV-related conference abstracts and reference lists of relevant articles were searched according to predefined terms and limited to items published from 1 October 2007 to 1 October 2012. Updates to conference presentations were checked for substantive journal publication up to 28 November 2013.. Of the 294 initial citations retrieved, manual selection identified 19 relevant publications describing gender-based analyses of ATV/r. Publications describing gender-based differences in efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions and adherence are critically evaluated.. As part of a combination antiretroviral therapy regimen, ATV/r appears to be a safe, effective and durable option for treatment-naive and early treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection, including non-pregnant and pregnant women.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Pregnancy; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Sex Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The recent case report of an HIV-infected child in Mississippi with viral control post-antiretroviral therapy (ART) interruption has sparked interest in the possibility of 'functional cure' in infants if they initiate ART very soon after birth. The 'Mississippi baby' also raises many new questions around the clinical care of HIV-infected infants and young children, including when treatment should be initiated, why treatment should be initiated, what treatment should be initiated, and how to identify infants early enough to treat them adequately. Here, we review research conducted before the report of the 'Mississippi baby' highlighting the important new issues that now need to be taken into consideration.

Topics: Age Factors; Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Protocols; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Nevirapine; Pregnancy; Ritonavir; Time Factors

Complete delineation of the HIV-1 life cycle has resulted in the development of several antiretroviral drugs. Twenty-five therapeutic agents belonging to five different classes are currently available for the treatment of HIV-1 infections. Advent of triple combination antiretroviral therapy has significantly lowered the mortality rate in HIV patients. However, fungal infections still represent major opportunistic diseases in immunocompromised patients worldwide.. Antiretroviral drugs that target enzymes and/or proteins indispensable for viral replication are discussed in this article. Fungal infections, causative organisms, epidemiology and preferred treatment modalities are also outlined. Finally, observed/predicted drug-drug interactions between antiretrovirals and antifungals are summarized along with clinical recommendations.. Concomitant use of amphotericin B and tenofovir must be closely monitored for renal functioning. Due to relatively weak interactive potential with the CYP450 system, fluconazole is the preferred antifungal drug. High itraconazole doses (> 200 mg/day) are not advised in patients receiving booster protease inhibitor (PI) regimen. Posaconazole is contraindicated in combination with either efavirenz or fosamprenavir. Moreover, voriconazole is contraindicated with high-dose ritonavir-boosted PI. Echinocandins may aid in overcoming the limitations of existing antifungal therapy. An increasing number of documented or predicted drug-drug interactions and therapeutic drug monitoring may aid in the management of HIV-associated opportunistic fungal infections.

Topics: AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Alkynes; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antifungal Agents; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Echinocandins; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Itraconazole; Mycoses; Organophosphates; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Triazoles; Voriconazole

To determine antiretroviral (ARV) pharmacokinetics in a patient who previously underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.. We describe a 38-year-old Hispanic man who tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 11 months following RYGB surgery. When the patient presented for care of his HIV, his HIV-1 RNA was 146 138 copies/mL (5.20 log) and his CD4 T cell count was 320 cells/mm(3) (25%). He was initiated on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg once daily, emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg once daily, and darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 600/100 mg twice daily. ARV concentrations were similar to historical data. Six months following ARV initiation, HIV-1 RNA was <48 copies/mL and CD4 count had increased to 562 cells/mm(3) (39%).. Bariatric surgery has been successfully performed in obese persons infected with the HIV, but data are limited on ARV drug selection and pharmacokinetics in this group. Optimal suppression of HIV replication requires appropriate concentrations of ARV drugs, and in a patient who has undergone RYGB, this can be challenging not only because of a decreased absorptive surface area but also because of an increased intragastric pH.. We found that once daily TDF/FTC and twice daily DRV/r produced trough concentrations similar to historic data in a patient who previously underwent RYGB with virologic suppression and immunologic recovery.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; Deoxycytidine; Emtricitabine; Gastric Bypass; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Organophosphonates; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir

In the absence of antiretroviral therapy (ART), over 50% of HIV-infected infants progress to AIDS and death by 2 years of age. However, there are challenges to initiation of ART in early life, including the possibility of drug resistance in the context of prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programs, a paucity of drug choices , uncertain dosing for some medications and long-term toxicities. Key management decisions include when to start ART, what regimen to start, and whether and when to substitute drugs or interrupt therapy. This review, an update of a previous review, aims to summarize the currently available evidence on this topic and inform the ART management in HIV-infected children less than 3 years of age.. To evaluate 1) when to start ART in young children (less than 3 years); 2) what ART to start with, comparing first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens; and 3) whether alternative strategies should be used to optimize antiretroviral treatment in this population: induction (initiation with 4 drugs rather than 3 drugs) followed by maintenance ART, interruption of ART and substitution of PI with NNRTI drugs once virological suppression is achieved on a PI-based regimen.. Search methodsWe searched for published studies in the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Review Group Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, Pubmed, EMBASE and CENTRAL. We screened abstracts from relevant conference proceedings and searched for unpublished and ongoing trials in clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform).. We identified RCTs that recruited perinatally HIV-infected children under 3 years of age without restriction of setting. We rejected trials that did not include children less than 3 years of age, did not provide stratified outcomes for those less than 3 years or did not evaluate either timing of ART initiation, choice of drug regimen or treatment switch/interruption strategy.. Two reviewers independently applied study selection criteria, assessed study quality and extracted data. Effects were assessed using the hazard ratio (HR) for time-to-event outcomes, relative risk for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference for continuous outcomes.. A search of the databases identified a total of 735 unique, previously unreviewed studies, of which 731 were excluded to leave 4 new studies to incorporate into the review. Four additional studies were identified in conference proceedings, for a total of 8 studies addressing when to start treatment (n=2), what to start (n=3), whether to substitute lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) with nevirapine (NVP) (n=1), whether to use an induction-maintenance ART strategy (n=1) and whether to interrupt treatment (n=1).Treatment initiation in asymptomatic infants with good immunological status was associated with a 75% reduction (HR=0.25; 95%CI 0.12-0.51; p=0.0002) in mortality or disease progression in the one trial with sufficient power to address this question. In a smaller pilot trial, median CD4 cell count was not significantly different between early and deferred treatment groups 12 months after ART.Regardless of previous exposure to nevirapine for PMTCT, the hazard for treatment failure at 24 weeks was 1.79 (95%CI 1.33, 2.41) times higher in children starting ART with a NVP-based regimen compared to those starting with a LPV/r-based regimen (p=0.0001) with no clear difference in the effect observed for children younger or older than 1 year. The hazard for virological failure at 24 weeks was overall 1.84 (95%CI 1.29, 2.63) times higher for children starting ART with a NVP-based regimen compared to those starting with a LPV/r-based regimen (p=0.0008) with a larger difference in time to virological failure (or death) between the NVP and LPV/r-based regimens when ART was initiated in the first year of life.Infants starting a LPV/r regimen and achieving sustained virological suppression who then substituted LPV/r with NVP after median 9 months on LPV/r were less likely to develop virological failure (defined as at least one VL greater than 50 copies/mL) compared with infants who started and stayed on LPV/r (HR=0.62, 95%CI 0.41, 0.92, p=0.02). However the hazard for confirmed failure at a higher viral load (>1000 copies/mL) was greater among children who switched to NVP compared to those who remained on LPV/r (HR=10.19, 95% CI 2.36, 43.94, p=0.002).Children undergoing an induction-maintenance ART approach with a 4-drug NNRTI-based regimen for 36 weeks, followed by 3-drug ART, had significantly greater CD4 rise than children receiving a standard 3-drug NNRTI-based ART at 36 weeks (mean difference 1.70 [95%CI 0.61, 2.79] p=0.002) and significantly better viral load response. ART initiation in asymptomatic children under 1 year of age reduces morbidity and mortality, but it remains unclear whether there are clinical benefits to starting ART in asymptomatic children diagnosed with HIV infection between 1-3 years.The available evidence shows that a LPV/r-based first-line regimen is more efficacious than a NVP-based regimen, regardless of PMTCT exposure status. New formulations of LPV/r are urgently required to enable new WHO recommendations to be implemented. An alternative approach to long-term LPV/r is substituting LPV/r with NVP once virological suppression is achieved. This strategy looked promising in the one trial undertaken, but may be difficult to implement in the absence of routine viral load testing.A 4-drug induction-maintenance approach showed short-term virological and immunological benefits during the induction phase but, in the absence of sustained benefits, is not recommended as a routine treatment strategy. Treatment interruption following early ART initiation in infancy was challenging for children who were severely immunocompromised in the context of poor clinical immunological condition at ART initiation due to the short duration of interruption, and is therefore not practical in ART treatment programmes where close monitoring is not feasible.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; Humans; Induction Chemotherapy; Infant; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lopinavir; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Nevirapine; Ritonavir

Few data are available on antiretroviral therapy (ART) response among HIV-2 infected patients. We conducted a systematic review on treatment outcomes among HIV-2 infected patients on ART, focusing on the immunological and virological responses in adults.. Data were extracted from articles that were selected after screening of PubMed/MEDLINE up to November 2012 and abstracts of the 1996-2012 international conferences. Observational cohorts, clinical trials and program reports were eligible as long as they reported data on ART response (clinical, immunological or virological) among HIV-2 infected patients. The determinants investigated included patients' demographic characteristics, CD4 cell count at baseline and ART received.. Seventeen reports (involving 976 HIV-2 only and 454 HIV1&2 dually reactive patients) were included in the final review, and the analysis presented in this report are related to HIV-2 infected patients only. There was no randomized controlled trial and only two cohorts had enrolled more than 100 HIV-2 only infected patients. The median CD4 count at ART initiation was 165 cells/mm3, [IQR; 137-201] and the median age at ART initiation was 44 years (IQR: 42-48 years). Ten studies included 103 patients treated with three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). Protease inhibitor (PI) based regimens were reported by 16 studies. Before 2009, the most frequent PIs used were Nelfinavir and Indinavir, whereas it was Lopinavir/ritonavir thereafter. The immunological response at month-12 was reported in six studies and the mean CD4 cell count increase was +118 cells/μL (min-max: 45-200 cells/μL).. Overall, clinical and immuno-virologic outcomes in HIV-2 infected individuals treated with ART are suboptimal. There is a need of randomized controlled trials to improve the management and outcomes of people living with HIV-2 infection.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-2; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nelfinavir; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

A network meta-analysis can provide estimates of relative efficacy for treatments not directly studied in head-to-head randomized controlled trials. We estimated the relative efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) versus third agents currently recommended by guidelines, including ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r), ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r), efavirenz (EFV), cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir (EVG/c), ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r), raltegravir (RAL), and rilpivirine (RPV), in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients.. A systematic review of published literature was conducted to identify phase 3/4 randomized controlled clinical trials (up to August 2013) including at least one third agent of interest in combination with a backbone nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimen. Bayesian fixed-effect network meta-analysis models adjusting for the type of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine [TDF/FTC] or abacavir/lamivudine [ABC/3TC]) were used to evaluate week 48 efficacy (HIV-RNA suppression to <50 copies/mL and change in CD4+ cells/µL) and safety (lipid changes, adverse events, and discontinuations due to adverse events) of DTG relative to all other treatments. Sensitivity analyses assessing the impact of NRTI treatment adjustment and random-effects models were performed.. Thirty-one studies including 17,000 patients were combined in the analysis. Adjusting for the effect of NRTI backbone, treatment with DTG resulted in significantly higher odds of virologic suppression (HIV RNA<50 copies/mL) and increase in CD4+ cells/µL versus ATV/r, DRV/r, EFV, LPV/r, and RPV. Dolutegravir had better or equivalent changes in total cholesterol, LDL, triglycerides, and lower odds of adverse events and discontinuation due to adverse events compared to all treatments. Random-effects and unadjusted models resulted in similar conclusions.. Three clinical trials of DTG have demonstrated comparable or superior efficacy and safety to DRV, RAL, and EFV in HIV-1-infected treatment-naive patients. This network meta-analysis suggests DTG is also favorable or comparable to other commonly used third agents (ATV/r, LPV/r, RPV, and EVG/c).

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Deoxycytidine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Emtricitabine; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lipids; Lopinavir; Nitriles; Organophosphonates; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rilpivirine; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Maternal-to-fetal transfer of antiretroviral drugs contributes to prevention of vertical transmission of HIV.. This systematic review discusses published studies containing data pertaining to the pharmacokinetics of placental transfer of antiretrovirals in humans, including paired cord and maternal plasma samples collected at the time of delivery as well as ex vivo placental perfusion models.. Articles pertaining to placental transfer of antiretrovirals were identified from PubMed, from references of included articles, and from US Department of Health and Human Services Panel on Treatment of HIV-infected Pregnant Women and Prevention of Perinatal Transmission guidelines. Articles from non-human animal models or that had no original maternal-to-fetal transfer data were excluded. PRISMA guidelines were followed.. A total of 103 published studies were identified. Data across studies appeared relatively consistent for the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and the non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), with cord to maternal ratios approaching 1 for many of these agents. The protease inhibitors atazanavir and lopinavir exhibited consistent maternal-to-fetal transfer across studies, although the transfer may be influenced by variations in drug-binding proteins. The protease inhibitors indinavir, nelfinavir, and saquinavir exhibited unreliable placental transport, with cord blood concentrations that were frequently undetectable. Limited data, primarily from case reports, indicate that darunavir and raltegravir provide detectable placental transfer.. These findings appear consistent with current guidelines of using two NRTIs plus an NNRTI, atazanavir/ritonavir, or lopinavir/ritonavir to maximize placental transfer as well as to optimally suppress maternal viral load. Darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir may reasonably serve as second-line agents.

Topics: Animals; Anti-HIV Agents; Female; Fetus; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Maternal-Fetal Exchange; Placenta; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; United States

Triple combination regimens consisting of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus 2 nucleoside/nucleotide analogs continue to be a valid option in initial antiretroviral therapy. Other protease inhibitors boosted with ritonavir (and in future with cobicistat) have been introduced, as well as other non-nucleoside analogs (rilpivirin) and 3 integrase inhibitors. None of the new regimens have shown superiority over LPV/r or comparisons are lacking. Therefore, regimens including LPV/r continue to be recommended as initial first-line or alternative strategies in most treatment guidelines. Dual combinations with LPV/r (plus raltegravir or lamivudine) are described in another article and can provide a similar response rate to triple combinations, better tolerance, and an improved cost-efficacy ratio, both for initial therapy and in simplification strategies. In contrast, LPV/r or darunavir/r monotherapy does not seem an acceptable option in treatment-naïve patients and is becoming increasingly less acceptable in simplification strategies.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Therapeutic Equivalency

According to evidence from randomized controlled trials and epidemiological data, the antiretroviral treatment (ART) of choice has consisted of the combination of 2 nucleoside analog reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) plus 1 non-nucleoside analog reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or a protease inhibitor (PI) for more than 17 years. There are several unresolved issues, notably the toxocity associated with NRTI, especially thymidine analogs, and the possibility of cross resistance, which may affect subsequent treatment. The development of new antiretroviral drugs with simpler dosing regimens and lower toxicity has led to evaluation of innovative strategies such as dual therapy for initial ART in treatment-naive, with the aim of preventing long-term toxicity and increasing treatment adherence. Despite encouraging results, some combinations have proven unsatisfactory. The strategies with favorable results to date consist of twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based regimens, those in the PROGRESS (LPV/r + raltegravir) and GARDEL (LPV/r + lamivudine) trials, and the combination of darunavir and raltegravir (NEAT 001 trial), although the latter observed a higher tendency (statistically nonsignificant) to virological failure in the dual combination arm. These trials were based on the use of NRTI-sparing regimens consisting of 2-3 fully- active agents for highly-active ART in treatment-naïve HIV-positive patients. Recent studies provide evidence supporting the use of NRTI-sparing regimens in HIV-infected patients with failure to an initial NNRTI-based ART regimen. The present review will discuss only LPV/r-based innovative strategies in initial ART regimens.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Therapies, Investigational

Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) is a protease inhibitor used for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in both normal patients and in certain situations. In patients with renal failure, LPV/r does not require dosage adjustment because it is metabolized in the liver. Cohort studies have shown that the incidence of varying degrees of renal disease and/or crystalluria related to combination antiretroviral therapy with tenofovir and some protease inhibitors (PI) does not appear with LPV/r or that the incidence is much lower with this combination. Neurocognitive impairments are described in a high proportion of patients with HIV infection and viral replication or related inflammatory activity in the subarachnoid space. In these patients, LPV/r is one of the therapeutic options. A score has been published that rates antiretroviral drugs according to the concentration attained in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). LPV/r levels reached in CSF exceed the IC50 of wild-type HIV and has a valuable score (score 3) of the drugs currently used. The most important comorbid condition is chronic hepatitis, due to its frequency and because the biotransformation of LPV/r occurs in the liver. In these circumstances, it is important to evaluate the influence of liver failure on blood drug levels and how these values may cause liver toxicity. LPV/r dose modification has not been established in the presence of liver failure. LPV/r-induced liver toxicity has only been reported with a certain frequency when liver enzymes were elevated at baseline or in patients with chronic hepatitis C, although most cases of liver toxicity were mild.

Topics: AIDS Dementia Complex; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug Combinations; Hepatitis, Viral, Human; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-2; Humans; Lopinavir; Renal Insufficiency; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Subarachnoid Space

There are clear sex-related biological differences between men and women. Diseases that affect the two sexes differently are studied separately. However, some diseases affect both men and women, but their incidence or outcome are clearly different. In human immunodeficiency virus infection, the potential differences in the effects of antiretroviral therapy are poorly characterized and few studies have been designed to elucidate these differences. Moreover, women are usually poorly represented in clinical trials of antiretroviral drugs.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Body Size; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lopinavir; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Patient Selection; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sex Characteristics

Ritonavir is commonly used as a pharmacokinetic booster for antiretroviral regimens in the management of human immunodeficiency virus infections. Limitations to ritonavir boosting include increased pill burden, adverse effects, and a wide range of clinically significant drug-drug interactions. Cobicistat is a new pharmacokinetic booster that is a selective inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A, the main metabolizing pathway of several antiretrovirals. Cobicistat has been studied as a booster for elvitegravir, a second-generation integrase inhibitor, and protease inhibitors. Based on successful clinical trials, a new single-tablet regimen of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir has been approved for the management of treatment-naïve patients. Additional studies are underway investigating the safety and efficacy of cobicistat-boosted protease inhibitor regimens for both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients. Cobicistat is well tolerated and may become a preferred booster for antiretroviral regimens, as it can be coformulated with several agents to create simpler regimens.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Cobicistat; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Inhibitors; HIV Infections; Humans; Ritonavir; Thiazoles

The development of tipranavir and darunavir, second generation non-peptidic HIV protease inhibitors, with marked improved resistance profiles, has opened a new perspective on the treatment of antiretroviral therapy (ART) experienced HIV patients with poor viral load control. The aim of this study was to determine the virologic response in ART experienced patients to tipranavir-ritonavir and darunavir-ritonavir based regimens.. A computer based literature search was conducted in the databases of HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative), Medline and Cochrane library. Meta-analysis was performed by including randomized controlled studies that were conducted in ART experienced patients with plasma viral load above 1,000 copies HIV RNA/ml. The odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for viral loads of <50 copies and <400 copies HIV RNA/ml at the end of the intervention were determined by the random effects model. Meta-regression, sensitivity analysis and funnel plots were done. The number of HIV-1 patients who were on either a tipranavir-ritonavir or darunavir-ritonavir based regimen and achieved viral load less than 50 copies HIV RNA/ml was significantly higher (overall OR = 3.4; 95% CI, 2.61-4.52) than the number of HIV-1 patients who were on investigator selected boosted comparator HIV-1 protease inhibitors (CPIs-ritonavir). Similarly, the number of patients with viral load less than 400 copies HIV RNA/ml was significantly higher in either the tipranavir-ritonavir or darunavir-ritonavir based regimen treated group (overall OR = 3.0; 95% CI, 2.15-4.11). Meta-regression showed that the viral load reduction was independent of baseline viral load, baseline CD4 count and duration of tipranavir-ritonavir or darunavir-ritonavir based regimen.. Tipranavir and darunavir based regimens were more effective in patients who were ART experienced and had poor viral load control. Further studies are required to determine their consistent viral load suppression effect as the duration of treatment is more prolonged.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

For some antiretroviral therapies, drug concentrations are reduced during pregnancy, potentially compromising effective virological suppression.. Data on atazanavir boosted with ritonavir in pregnancy are reviewed.. With standard atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once-daily dosing: atazanavir area-under-the-concentration-time curves were reduced during pregnancy in most studies, but overall interpretation differed according to the data used for comparison; atazanavir concentration 24 h post-dose was maintained >150 ng/ml in 97.6% of women; no instance of mother-to-child transmission occurred in treatment-adherent mothers; and infant hyperbilirubinaemia was not elevated beyond levels expected in the neonatal period.. With concurrent medications that reduce atazanavir drug concentrations, optimal therapy during pregnancy may require once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg; however, using this dose during the third trimester doubled maternal grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinaemia rates.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Pregnancy; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Nevirapine belongs to the group of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and is commonly administered in first-line treatment of HIV infection.. Systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to compare effectiveness of nevirapine-based regimens with other antiretroviral schedules used as an initial treatment of HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive subjects.. Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Trip Database) were searched up to 28 December 2012 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published as a full text and regarding nevirapine-based regimens used as a initial treatment for HIV infection. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan(®) V 5.2 software.. Twelve RCTs were included in the systematic review and all of them were suitable for meta-analysis. Results of the meta-analysis have shown that nevirapine, efavirenz, and ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, added to the background regimens, were equally effective in terms of reaching undetectable plasma HIV RNA level as well as risk of disease progression or death. Compared with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens, nevirapine-based regimens statistically significantly increased the risk of discontinuation of assigned treatment (RR=3.10; 95% CI: 1.14-8.41; p<0.05).. Despite limited RCTs data available for particular comparisons, our results suggest that nevirapine-based regimens may be considered for first-line treatment of HIV-infected adults, due to their comparable efficacy to the other currently recommended initial antiretroviral therapies.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Nevirapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) has demonstrated virological and immunological efficacy in the combined antiretroviral treatment (cART), in both naïve and experienced patients. Furthermore, LPV/r showed a high barrier to the development of resistance. Although generally well tolerated, adverse gastrointestinal side effects and metabolic disorders are frequent. The different tools used to optimise the cART with this drug combination in the daily clinical practice, emphasising the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of LPV/r and the genetic analysis of the main enzymes responsible for the metabolism and transport, are reviewed. The relationship between phenotype and genotype, established through TDM, could be useful for the physician to improve the clinical management of the HIV infection, due to the possibility of individualising the dose with this drug. Monotherapy is also reviewed as a new strategy used in the simplification of the treatment with this drug, which could increase safety and reduce costs.

Topics: Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Ritonavir

HCV infection is a major cause of mortality worldwide. HCV-related deaths also represent a leading cause of mortality in HIV-coinfected individuals. Telaprevir is an NS3/4A protease inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1 infection in adults in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Telaprevir-based treatment has been shown to increase rates of sustained viral response in HCV genotype-1-monoinfected patients, and studies in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients are ongoing. Drug-drug interactions of telaprevir with antiretroviral drugs were investigated in a series of studies in healthy subjects. This review summarizes the results of interaction studies with low-dose ritonavir, ritonavir-boosted HIV protease inhibitors (atazanavir, darunavir, fosamprenavir and lopinavir), efavirenz, etravirine, rilpivirine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and raltegravir.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Coinfection; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Protease Inhibitors; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir

Recent in vitro and in vivo studies have shown a potent inhibition of cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 through human immune deficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (PIs). The PI ritonavir is described as the most potent compound within these CYP3A4 inhibitors. We present 2 cases who developed the sequelae of glucocorticoid excess following ritonavir therapy and inhalative glucocorticoid treatment: A 60-year-old HIV positive man developed the typical symptoms of Cushing's syndrome and a 52-year-old HIV positive man developed severe osteoporosis.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Cushing Syndrome; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Enzyme Inhibitors; Glucocorticoids; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polypharmacy; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Ritonavir

Protease inhibitor monotherapy has been shown to be effective in maintaining long-term viral suppression in a majority of patients. Withdrawal of nucleoside analogues can prevent long-term toxicity related to these drugs. Clinical trials have recently reported preliminary data on the beneficial effect of protease inhibitor monotherapy on body fat distribution and bone metabolism. Some of the uncertainties possibly associated with protease inhibitor monotherapy such as the increased risk of neurological events and a higher level of subclinical inflammation will be discussed in this review.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Bone Density; Carbamates; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; Furans; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Organophosphates; Protease Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Darunavir , a nonpeptidic inhibitor of the HIV-1 protease with potent activity against resistant virus, was initially approved by the FDA (2006) and the EMA (2007) for the treatment of antiretroviral-experienced adults, and later for naive adults. Darunavir/ritonavir (600/100 mg twice daily, ideally given with two other active antiretrovirals) demonstrated superior efficacy compared to lopinavir/ritonavir and other protease inhibitors in highly experienced patients. Darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg once daily) was demonstrated to be safe and effective for the treatment of naive patients and those with limited darunavir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). Because darunavir must be coadministered with ritonavir, cytochrome P450 drug-drug interactions can be problematic.. The chemistry, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety of darunavir are reviewed in this paper. A PubMed search was conducted using the search terms 'randomized', 'darunavir' and 'efficacy'. Review articles and studies that primarily focused on other drugs were excluded.. Because darunavir exhibits efficacy against virus with significant protease inhibitor resistance mutations, it is critically important in the treatment of experienced patients, although viral suppression rates may be lower in those with a high baseline viral load or a greater number of cumulative darunavir RAMs. Darunavir/ritonavir is efficacious and well tolerated as a once-daily regimen in naive patients.

Topics: Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medicine; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Virus Replication

In the absence of antiretroviral therapy (ART), over 50% of HIV-infected infants progress to AIDS and death by 2 years of age. However, there are challenges to initiate ART in early life, including the possibility of drug resistance in the context of prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programs, a paucity of drug choices , uncertain dosing for some medications and long-term toxicities. Key management decisions include when to start ART, what regimen to start, and whether and when to switch or interrupt therapy. This review aims to summarize the currently available evidence on this topic and inform the ART management in HIV-infected children less than 2 years of age.. To evaluate 1) when to start ART in young children; 2) what ART to start with, comparing first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and PI-based regimens; and 3) whether and when ART should be stopped or switched from a PI-based regimen to an NNRTI-based regimen.. We searched for published studies in the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Review Group Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, Pubmed, EMBASE and CENTRAL. We screened abstracts from relevant conference proceedings and searched for unpublished and ongoing trials in clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform).. We identified RCTs that recruited perinatally HIV-infected children under 2 years of age without restriction of setting. We rejected trials that did not include children less than 2 years of age, or did not evaluate either timing of ART initiation, choice of drug regimen or treatment switch/interruption strategy.. Two reviewers independently applied study selection criteria, assessed study quality and extracted data. Effects were assessed using the hazard ratio (HR) for time-to-event outcomes, relative risk for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference for continuous outcomes.. Of 1921 records retrieved, 5 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, addressing when to start treatment (n=2), what to start (n=2) and whether to switch regimen (n=1). Three ongoing studies that address the question of treatment interruption were also identified.Early infant treatment was associated with a 75% reduction (HR=0.25; 95%CI 0.12-0.51; p=0.0002) in mortality or disease progression in the one trial with sufficient power to address this question. In a smaller trial,median CD4 cell count was not significantly different between early and deferred treatment groups 12 months after ART.Regardless of previous exposure to nevirapine for PMTCT, the hazard for treatment failure was 2.01 (95%CI 1.47, 2.77) times higher in children starting ART with a NVP-based regimen compared to those starting with a LPV/r-based regimen (p<0.0001) with no clear difference in effect by age group. The hazard for virological failure was overall 2.28 (95%CI 1.55, 3.34) times higher for children starting ART with a NVP-based regimen compared to those starting with a LPV/r-based regimen (p=0.0005) with a larger difference in time to virological failure (or death) between the NVP and LPV/r-based regimens when ART was initiated in the first year of life. By contrast, increases in weight z-score (MD=0.37, 95%CI 0.08, 0.65, p=0.01) and height z-score (MD=0.23, 95%CI 0.04, 0.42, p=0.02) were larger in the NVP arm compared to the LPV/r arm .Infants starting on a LPV/r regimen but who then switched to a NVP-based regimen after a median time of 9 months on LPV/r were less likely to develop virological failure (defined as at least one VL greater than 50 copies/mL) compared with infants who started and stayed on LPV/r (HR=0.62, 95%CI 0.41, 0.92, p=0.02). However the hazard for confirmed failure at a higher viral load (>1000 copies/mL) was higher among children who switched to NVP compared to those who remained on LPV/r (HR=10.19, 95% CI 2.36, 43.94, p=0.002).. Immediate ART reduces morbidity and mortality among infants and may improve neurodevelopmental outcome. However It remains unclear whether all children diagnosed with HIV infection between 1-2 years of age should start ART, as has been recommended by the World Health Organization on practical grounds.The available evidence suggests that a LPV/r-based first-line regimen is more potent than NVP, regardless of PMTCT exposure status. However, this finding provides a dilemma to policy-makers because higher cost, poor palatability, inconvenient formulation and cold chain requirements make LPV/r a more costly and challenging first-line regimen. An alternative approach to long-term LPV/r is switching to NVP (maintaining the NRTI backbone) once virological suppression is achieved. This strategy looked promising in the one trial undertaken, but may be difficult to implement in the absence of VL testing. Ongoing trials are exploring the possibility of starting early ART and interrupting treatment beyond the critical period of rapid disease progression and neurological development. Further evidence is urgently required to better inform policy on first-line treatment recommendations in young children and more robust data addressing non-virological outcomes are also needed.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lopinavir; Nevirapine; Ritonavir

Despite the remarkable success of combination antiretroviral therapy, usually including the association of three antiretroviral drugs selected from two different classes, the possibility of treating HIV-infected patients with one single potent agent as simplified maintenance regimen has attracted clinicians and researchers over the past years. Monotherapy with one ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in subjects with persistently suppressed plasma HIV RNA offers several potential advantages, such as avoiding the long-term toxicity associated with nucleoside/nucleotide analog, reducing costs, preventing drug-drug interactions, and preserving future treatment options. Several controlled and uncontrolled studies have assessed efficacy and safety of this monotherapy strategy, and the majority of available data concern lopinavir/ritonavir and darunavir/ritonavir. The virological efficacy of these boosted protease inhibitors as monotherapy is slightly lower than that of standard therapy, but the risk of resistance development is minimal and the re-introduction of nucleoside analogues usually leads to a re-suppression of the plasma viral load. Even though currently there is no consensus about the clinical use of protease inhibitor monotherapy for the treatment of HIV infection, this strategy seems an option for selected patients on stable combination therapy, with persistently suppressed plasma viral load, and without a history of virologic failure while receiving protease inhibitors. The aim of this article is to review and summarize the most recent randomized and observational studies which have evaluated efficacy and safety of the protease inhibitor monotherapy.

Topics: Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

HIV protease inhibitors have been part of highly active therapy regimens throughout the past 16 years of antiretroviral therapy. The majority of currently available protease inhibitors are coadministered with low-dose ritonavir (RTV) as a pharmacoenhancer, significantly increasing their plasma concentrations. This therapeutic principle called 'boosting' helped to overcome the obstacles of this class of drugs concerning unfavorable pharmacokinetics, resulting in either a high frequency of dosing or subtherapeutic plasma concentrations. The coadministration of RTV together with HIV protease inhibitors created a potent, clinically effective antiretroviral therapy, which is more convenient for the patient, and has revealed a high genetic barrier to viral resistance. RTV is the only pharmacoenhancing agent available to date; however, cobicistat, a selective CYP3A4 inhibitor, is about to enter the market. This article reviews current literature, compares the safety of both pharmacoenhancers and appraises their use in current and future HIV therapy.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Carbamates; Cobicistat; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Discovery; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Ritonavir; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory disease affecting 2-3% of the worldwide population, and it may worsen with HIV or be detected as HIV cutaneous manifestation. HIV-related psoriasis shows a severe and prolonged clinical course with more frequent exacerbations. The management of this condition is challenging because immunomodulating and immunosuppressant agents may have variable and partial efficacy, and therefore, antiretroviral treatment represents a potential adjunctive therapeutic option.. In the case we report, the HIV test was shown to be crucial for driving the therapeutic approach. Indeed, antiretroviral agents have been proven to be effective in the treatment of HIV+ psoriasis as first-line therapy.. The HIV test should be considered in high-risk patients affected by severe psoriasis and resistant to conventional and biological treatments.

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Deoxycytidine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Psoriasis; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

Multidrug regimens and corresponding drug interactions cause many adverse reactions and treatment failures. Drug efflux transporters: P-gp, MRP, BCRP in conjunction with metabolizing enzymes (CYPs) are major factors in such interactions. Most effective combination antiretrovirals (ARV) therapy includes a PI or a NNRTI or two NRTI. Coadministration of such ARV may induce efflux transporters and/or CYP3A4 resulting in sub-therapeutic blood levels and therapeutic failure due to reduced absorption and/or increased metabolism. A similar prognosis is true for ARV-compounds and drugs of abuse combinations. Morphine and nicotine enhance CYP3A4 and MDR1 expression in vitro. A 2.5 fold rise of cortisol metabolite was evident in smokers relative to nonsmokers. Altered functions of efflux transporters and CYPs in response to ARV and drugs of abuse may result in altered drug absorption and metabolism. Appropriate in vitro models can be employed to predict such interactions. Influence of genetic polymorphism, SNP and inter-individual variation in drug response has been discussed. Complexity underlying the relationship between efflux transporters and CYP makes it difficult to predict the outcome of HAART as such, particularly when HIV patients taking drugs of abuse do not adhere to HAART regimens. HIV(+) pregnant women on HAART medications, indulging in drugs of abuse, may develop higher viral load due to such interactions and lead to increase in mother to child transmission of HIV. A multidisciplinary approach with clear understanding of mechanism of interactions may allow proper selection of regimens so that desired therapeutic outcome of HAART can be reached without any side effects.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2; ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters; Benzodiazepines; Cocaine; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Methamphetamine; Neoplasm Proteins; Pregnancy; Ritonavir; Substance-Related Disorders

HIV is a worldwide epidemic that can be managed by combination antiretroviral therapy. Effective regimens commonly include the use of a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI). In February 2010, the FDA approved heat-stable ritonavir tablets for management of HIV; these do not require refrigeration and may improve patient access.. The goal of this article is to review the ritonavir 100 mg heat-stable tablet formulation for the treatment of HIV, focusing on recent pharmacokinetic studies, safety and tolerability data, administration, and storage.. With recent FDA approval, it is important that clinicians and pharmacists are knowledgeable about the differences between heat-stable ritonavir tablets and the previous soft-gel-capsule (SGC) formulation.. Heat-stable ritonavir tablets are not bioequivalent to previous SGC and differ in regards to storage requirements. Despite this, ritonavir tablets appear to be well tolerated and may provide additional options for selected patients with HIV.

Topics: Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Drug Stability; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Hot Temperature; Humans; Ritonavir; Tablets; Therapeutic Equivalency

The present review focuses on recent data about boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy for maintenance of HIV virological suppression.. Until recently most of the trials of boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy have studied lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy. These trials showed a slightly inferior efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy than that of lopinavir/ritonavir and two nucleosides. Two clinical trials [Monotherapy in Europe with TMC114 (MONET) and Monotherapy inhibitor protease (MONOI)] have shown that darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy has also a slightly lower efficacy for maintenance of virological suppression than darunavir/ritonavir with two nucleosides. The risk of resistance development is minimal and patients who fail this strategy can be re-suppressed again by adding nucleosides or switching to a triple therapy regimen without having lost therapeutic options. MONOI has also shown limb fat recovery in patients receiving darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy and good penetration of darunavir in the seminal fluid. There are still conflicting views about the ability of boosted protease inhibitor to protect the central nervous system from HIV replication. There are no randomized clinical trials showing a higher risk of discordant HIV replication in the cerebrospinal fluid in patients exposed to monotherapy. There are insufficient data of monotherapy with atazanavir/ritonavir.. There currently is no consensus about the role of boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy for the treatment of HIV infection. It is clear that suppression can be maintained in a large proportion of patients without exposing patients to a substantial risk of resistance development, but the precise role of this strategy is still undefined.

Topics: Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Ritonavir therapy is not generally considered nephrotoxic. We report a case of acute kidney injury secondary to ritonavir, with kidney biopsy demonstrating extensive acute tubular injury. This is the first report of a kidney biopsy and pathology in acute kidney injury associated with ritonavir. A review of published medical literature on the topic is also presented.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Biomarkers; Biopsy; Creatinine; Drug Substitution; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Tubules; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Time Factors

Knowledge of drug interactions is vital to maximize antiretroviral efficacy and avoid drug-related toxicities. Treatment of co-morbidities has become a difficult task in HIV-infected individuals because pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interactions are common when other medications are prescribed along with antiretroviral agents.. This article provides an update of the most relevant drug interactions that occur between antiretroviral agents and other drugs. The article additionally revisits how these drug interactions can be prevented from occurring as well as how they can be managed.. Interactions between antiretrovirals and other drugs are frequent in clinical practice. The most common are those affecting drug metabolism due to induction or inhibition of the CYP450, leading to abnormal drug exposure. It is by this mechanism that most HIV protease inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and maraviroc often interact with other medications. In contrast, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and some integrase inhibitors, which do not or only marginally affect CYP450, are relatively free of significant pharmacokinetic interactions, although nucleoside analogs might be involved in some pharmacodynamic interactions.

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Anticonvulsants; Cardiovascular Agents; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Herbal Medicine; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Immunosuppressive Agents; Psychotropic Drugs; Ritonavir

Darunavir boosted with ritonavir (DRV/r) in combination with other antiretrovirals (ARVs) was initially approved in 2006 for the treatment of HIV infection in ARV treatment-experienced adults and has subsequently been approved for use in treatment-naive adults in 2008. Clinical studies have shown that DRV/r in combination with other ARVs achieves superior levels of undetectable plasma HIV RNA and generates significant CD4 increases, which reduce the risk of HIV disease progression. Economic evaluations, based on data from controlled clinical trials, found DRV/r combination therapy to generate savings in hospital costs and other non-ARV costs of care in treatment-experienced patients, to maximize the number of patients reaching undetectable plasma HIV RNA, to improve health-related quality of life and quality-adjusted life expectancy, and to be cost effective across different patient populations.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Darunavir; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

The advent of combination antiretroviral therapy has led to significant improvement in the care of HIV-infected patients. Originally designed as a protease inhibitor (PI), ritonavir is currently exclusively used as a pharmacokinetic enhancer of other protease inhibitors, predominantly due to ritonavir's potent inhibition of the cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme. Ritonavir-boosting of PIs decrease pill burden and frequency of dosing. Boosted PIs are recommended for first-line therapy in treatment and play a key role in the management of treatment-experienced patients. Potential problems associated with PIs include metabolic abnormalities (e.g. dyslipidemia), increased cardiovascular risk, and drug interactions.

Topics: Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Ritonavir

Darunavir is a new-generation nonpeptidic HIV protease inhibitor (PI), used with low doses of ritonavir for pharmacologic enhancement (boosting). It has demonstrated potent activity against multidrug-resistant HIV, with a robust resistance profile and a distinct set of mutations. In heavily treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection, darunavir administered twice daily with ritonavir has shown higher rates of efficacy than the control PI. In less treatment-experienced patients, boosted darunavir was noninferior to boosted lopinavir. In treatment-naive patients, boosted darunavir administered once daily was noninferior to boosted lopinavir, and showed higher virologic and immunological response rates in patients with high baseline viral load and low baseline CD4(+) cell counts. Monotherapy with boosted darunavir is an acceptable option in some specific conditions. Boosted darunavir was generally well tolerated, with lower incidence of diarrhea and a more favorable lipid profile than boosted lopinavir in treatment-naive patients.

Topics: Darunavir; Drug Administration Routes; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Virus Replication

HIV-positive children are at high risk of drug resistance, which is of particular concern in settings where antiretroviral options are limited. In this Review we explore resistance rates and patterns among children in developing countries in whom antiretroviral treatment has failed. We did a systematic search of online databases and conference abstracts and included studies reporting HIV-1 drug resistance after failure of first-line paediatric regimens in children (<18 years) in resource-poor regions (Latin America, Africa, and Asia). We retrieved 1312 citations, of which 30 studies reporting outcomes in 3241 children were eligible. Viruses with resistance-associated mutations were isolated from 90% (95% CI 88-93%) of children. The prevalence of mutations associated with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors was 80%, with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors was 88%, and with protease inhibitors was 54%. Methods to prevent treatment failure, including adequate paediatric formulations and affordable salvage treatment options are urgently needed.

Topics: Adolescent; Africa; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Asia; Benzoxazines; Child; Child, Preschool; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cyclopropanes; Developing Countries; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Health Resources; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Latin America; Lopinavir; Male; Mutation; Nevirapine; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Stavudine; Treatment Failure; Viral Load; Zidovudine

Darunavir is a nonpeptidic HIV type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitor (PI) that binds with high affinity to the HIV-1 protease, including multi-drug resistant proteases. This drug is highly potent against a range of laboratory strains and clinical isolates of wild-type and multidrug-resistant HIV and has limited potential to cause cytotoxicity. Darunavir did not display cross-resistance with other PIs in vitro. The coadministration of a low boosting dose of ritonavir with darunavir (boosted darunavir) increases the bioavailablity of darunavir. The drug is also administered together with other highly active antiretroviral agents. The efficacy of twice-daily boosted darunavir (11-19 mg/kg plus ritonavir 1.5-2.5 mg/kg) in treatment-experienced pediatric patients (aged 6-17 years and weighing > or =20 kg; n = 80) was demonstrated in the phase II DELPHI trial, where a virologic response (HIV-1 RNA reduction from baseline of > or =1 log(10) copies/mL) at week 24 (primary endpoint) was achieved in 74% of patients, and 88% of these patients sustained this level of response at week 48. Boosted darunavir was generally well tolerated in the DELPHI trial, with a similar profile to that observed in adults. The mean triglyceride level at week 48 was lower than that at baseline, and cholesterol levels increased slightly but remained within the normal range.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Darunavir; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Synergism; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

While street drugs appear unlikely to alter the metabolism of antiretroviral (ARV) medications, several ARVs may induce or inhibit metabolism of various street drugs. However, research on these interactions is limited. Case reports have documented life-threatening overdoses of ecstasy and gamma-hydroxybutyrate after starting ritonavir, an ARV that inhibits several metabolic enzymes. For opioid addiction, methadone or buprenorphine are the treatments of choice. Because a number of ARVs decrease or increase methadone levels, patients should be monitored for methadone withdrawal or toxicity when they start or stop ARVs. Most ARVs do not cause buprenorphine withdrawal or toxicity, even if they alter buprenorphine levels, with rare exceptions to date including atazanavir/ritonavir associated with significant increases in buprenorphine and adverse events related to sedation and mental status changes in some cases. There are newer medications yet to be studied with methadone or buprenorphine. Further, there are many frequently used medications in treatment of complications of HIV disease that have not been studied. There is need for continuing research to define these drug interactions and their clinical significance.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-HIV Agents; Buprenorphine; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Illicit Drugs; Methadone; Opioid-Related Disorders; Ritonavir

To compare lipid profiles in HIV-infected adults receiving atazanavir-based regimens.. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing atazanavir or atazanavir/ritonavir with a comparator and evaluated lipids at 48 weeks. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS, Current Controlled Trials, National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry, trials at AIDSinfo and HIV conference proceedings to May 2009. Standardized mean difference (SMD) between study arms in change from baseline to week 48 in lipid parameters was determined weighted by study size and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.. Nine eligible RCTs were identified (n = 3346). SMDs (mmol/L) in four RCTs comparing atazanavir/ritonavir with a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor were: total cholesterol, -0.62 (95% CI -0.72, -0.51); low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, -0.31 (95% CI -0.44, -0.17); high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, -0.16 (95% CI -0.27, -0.06); non-HDL cholesterol, -0.58 (95% CI -0.69, -0.48); and triglycerides, -0.46 (95% CI -0.58, -0.34). Atazanavir compared with non-atazanavir (three RCTs) found lower total, LDL and non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides [SMD -0.87 mmol/L (95% CI -0.99, -0.76); -0.56 mmol/L (95% CI -0.67, -0.45); -0.88 mmol/L (95% CI -0.99, -0.76); and -0.56 mmol/L (95% CI -0.75, -0.36), respectively], but HDL cholesterol did not differ [-0.16 mmol/L (95% CI -0.49, 0.16)]. In the atazanavir/ritonavir versus atazanavir comparison (two RCTs), total [SMD 0.44 mmol/L (95% CI 0.23, 0.65)] and non-HDL cholesterol [SMD 0.44 mmol/L (95% CI 0.23, 0.65)] were higher, but HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides were not different.. At 48 weeks, plasma lipid concentrations were lower with atazanavir/ritonavir than with other ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor regimens. Total and non-HDL cholesterol were higher with atazanavir/ritonavir than atazanavir alone.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; HIV Infections; Humans; Lipids; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir

Lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra®) is an orally administered coformulated ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) comprising lopinavir and low-dose ritonavir. It is indicated, in combination with other antiretroviral agents, for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults, adolescents and children. Lopinavir/ritonavir is available as a tablet, soft-gel capsule and an oral solution for patients with difficulty swallowing. In well designed, randomized clinical trials, lopinavir/ritonavir, in combination with other antiretroviral therapies (ART), provided durable virological suppression and improved immunological outcomes in both ART-naive and -experienced adult patients with virological failure. Furthermore, lopinavir/ritonavir demonstrated a high barrier to the development of resistance in ART-naive patients. More limited data indicate that it is effective in reducing plasma HIV-1 RNA levels in paediatric patients. Lopinavir/ritonavir has served as a well established benchmark comparator for the noninferiority of other ritonavir-boosted PI regimens. Although generally well tolerated, lopinavir/ritonavir is associated with generally manageable adverse gastrointestinal side effects and hypertriglyceridaemia and hypercholesterolaemia, which may require coadministration of lipid-lowering agents to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease. Lopinavir/ritonavir, in combination with other ART agents, is a well established and cost-effective treatment for both ART-naive and -experienced patients with HIV-1 infection and, with successful management of adverse events, continues to have a role as an effective component of ART regimens for the control of HIV-1 infection.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Several national and international guidelines recommend the use of antiretroviral therapy containing a protease inhibitor (PI) with ritonavir (RTV) boosting for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected treatment-naïve patients. RTV-boosted PIs such as lopinavir (LPV/r), atazanavir (ATV + RTV), darunavir (DRV + RTV), fosamprenavir (FPV + RTV), and saquinavir (SQV + RTV) are usually recommended in regimens for initial therapy. The guideline recommendations are generally based on the clinical efficacy of the regimens. A broadened perspective of assessing the evidence related to selection of a PI for optimal first-line therapy might consider additional factors for evaluation, such as effectiveness in actual clinical practice and cost-effectiveness of individual drugs in formulating recommendations. Among the guideline-recommended PIs, LPV/r is one of the earliest PIs approved, has been a well-recognized boosted PI for treatment-naïve patients in all guidelines, and demonstrates the most evidence on long-term clinical and economic effectiveness. Studies have shown its efficacy in various controlled and real-world settings in different populations, the relationship of adherence to virologic efficacy, and the implications of resistance when used in sequence with other PI regimens. In the absence of published evidence for other guideline-recommended PIs that will greatly facilitate a fully transparent, comparative effectiveness evaluation, the cumulative evidence from this broader perspective indicates all PIs should not be viewed as equally safe and effective across all patients for initial therapy, nor should any single PI within the class be considered preferred for all treatment-naïve patients.

Topics: Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Synergism; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

The aim of this review is to discuss the effect of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in the antiretroviral treatment of HIV infection. In particular, but not exclusively, DDIs due to the cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitor ritonavir, which is used to increase antiretroviral drug exposure - a technique known as pharmacokinetic enhancement or 'ritonavir boosting'- will be reviewed. The emphasis here will be on the treatment of important co-morbidities common in patients with HIV, including dyslipidaemia, hypertension, tuberculosis and opiate dependence, as well as on the potentially life-threatening interaction between ritonavir and inhalational steroids, and on the effect of acid-reducing agents on some antiretroviral drugs. Finally, further developments with regard to the use of CYP3A-blocking agents to augment the efficacy of antiviral therapy will be discussed.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Glucocorticoids; HIV Infections; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Ritonavir

Darunavir boosted by low-dose ritonavir (DRV/r), at a daily dose of 600/100 mg twice a day (bid), has been shown to be superior to alternative highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens for the management of treatment-experienced, HIV-infected adults in the phase IIb POWER trials and the phase III TITAN trial. Economic analyses of different types that have been performed for several countries to investigate the cost effectiveness and budgetary impact of DRV/r 600/100 mg bid for treatment-experienced people living with HIV (PLHIV) based on the clinical data gathered in the POWER and TITAN trials are reviewed for consistency and their value to different decision-makers is assessed. Cost-utility analyses for the USA and several European countries indicate that DRV/r-based HAART is cost effective compared with other standard of care protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens in PLHIV with evidence of PI resistance. For all of these countries, the estimated cost-utility ratio is well below typical benchmark values and these ratios are robust, as demonstrated by one-way sensitivity and variability analyses and multi-way probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Studies using other metrics including the average 1-year drug cost per patient with a plasma HIV-RNA level less than 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks, the incremental drug cost per additional patient with a plasma HIV-RNA level less than 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks, the total (antiretroviral and non-antiretroviral) costs during the first year of treatment, and the total healthcare budget impact during the first 5 years of treatment provided further evidence of the positive economic outcomes with the use of DRV/r in treatment-experienced PLHIV. Different measures of economic outcomes are useful for different types of decision-makers and different types of decisions. In general, the results of these different types of analyses will be consistent with each other. For darunavir, the economic analyses reviewed in this paper demonstrate that the use of DRV/r 600/100 mg bid in the management of HIV-infected, treatment-experienced adults who have failed at least one of the other currently available PIs is cost effective and may be cost saving.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Darunavir; Drug Costs; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV Seropositivity; Humans; Ritonavir; Standard of Care; Sulfonamides

Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases; Animals; Antiviral Agents; Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases; Biological Products; Darunavir; Drug Design; Drug Discovery; Drug Resistance, Viral; Enzyme Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Molecular Mimicry; Molecular Structure; Peptides; Structure-Activity Relationship; Sulfonamides

To assess the efficacy of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy.. Systematic review of all protease inhibitor-monotherapy studies published in peer-reviewed journals or presented at conferences to date. Data of randomized controlled trials were pooled to yield common odds ratios.. Twenty-two protease inhibitor-monotherapy studies were identified. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 395 out of 582 (67.9%) patients had undetectable HIV-RNA at the end of follow-up. In the six randomized controlled trials (all lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy), the risk of therapy failure was greater on monotherapy: 121 out of 364 (33.2%) patients on monotherapy against 64 out of 280 (22.9%) patients on HAART [pooled odds ratio 1.48 (95% confidence interval 1.02-2.13, P = 0.037)]. Regarding patients with successfully resuppressed HIV-RNA upon (re-)introducing nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) as nonfailures, the risk of therapy failure was comparable: 98 out of 364 (26.9%) against 64 out of 280 (22.9%) patients [odds ratio 1.05 (95% confidence interval 0.72-1.53, P = 0.81)].. The overall efficacy of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy is inferior to HAART. The efficacy improves in patients started on monotherapy after suppressed HIV-RNA for at least 6 months. Ten percent of patients have viral rebound with HIV-RNA levels between 50 and 500 copies/ml. Possible explanations are lack of HIV suppression in particular cells or compartments, alternative resistance mechanisms, and nonadherence. Once proven that reintroduction of NRTIs, in patients with loss of viral suppression, is safe and effective, a broader use of simplification of HAART to protease inhibitor monotherapy might be justified. This review supports that the majority of patients with prolonged viral suppression on HAART can successfully be treated with protease inhibitor monotherapy. Arguments for this strategy are NRTI/NNRTI side effects, NRTI/NNRTI resistance, and costs.

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

To review the evidence on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of non-occupational postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV.. Eleven electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2007.. Selected studies were assessed, subjected to data extraction using a standard template and quality assessment using published criteria. Studies were synthesised using a narrative approach with full tabulation of results from all included studies.. One clinical effectiveness study meeting the inclusion criteria was identified, a cohort study of PEP in a high-risk HIV-negative homosexual male cohort in Brazil. The quality of the study was generally weak. Seroincidence in the cohort as a whole (2.9 per 100 person-years) was very similar to that expected in this population (3.1 per 100 person-years, p > 0.97), despite the seroconversion to HIV being 1/68 in the PEP group and 10/132 in the group not receiving PEP. High-risk sexual activities declined over time for both PEP and non-PEP users. Four economic evaluations met the inclusion criteria of the review. The methodological quality of the studies was mixed. The studies are constrained by a lack of published data on the clinical effectiveness of PEP after non-occupational exposure, with effectiveness data derived from one study of occupational PEP. Their generalisability to the UK is not clear. Results suggest that PEP following non-occupational exposure to HIV was cost saving for men who have unprotected receptive anal intercourse with men, whether the source partner is known to be HIV positive or not; heterosexuals after unprotected receptive anal intercourse; and intravenous drug users sharing needles with a known HIV-positive person. PEP following non-occupational exposure to HIV was cost-effective for all male-male intercourse (unprotected receptive and insertive anal intercourse, unprotected receptive oral sex, and 'other') and was possibly cost-effective for intravenous drug users and high-risk women. Four additional studies were identified giving further information about adverse events associated with PEP after non-occupational exposure to HIV. The majority of participants experienced adverse events with the most common being nausea and fatigue. Rates were generally higher in participants receiving triple therapy than in participants receiving dual therapy. Completion of PEP therapy was variable, ranging from 24% to 78% of participants depending on type of therapy. Toxicity was the main reason for discontinuation of treatment.. It is not possible to draw conclusions on the clinical effectiveness of non-occupational PEP for HIV because of the limited evidence available. The review of cost-effectiveness suggests that non-occupational PEP may be cost-effective, especially in certain population subgroups; however, the assumptions made and data sources used in the cost-effectiveness studies mean that their results should be used with caution.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Databases, Bibliographic; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Seropositivity; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Premedication; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Unsafe Sex; Zidovudine

Current U.S. guidelines for initial therapy of HIV type-1 (HIV-1) infection recommend daily, lifelong treatment with a combination of three antiretroviral drugs consisting of two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors and a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or a protease inhibitor. Although this approach has been successful in reducing morbidity and mortality from HIV-1 infection, concerns remain about adverse events from chronic drug exposure, the requirement for daily medication adherence, the risk of HIV-1 drug resistance and high treatment costs. The availability of antiretrovirals that are coformulated and dosed once daily have reduced pill burden and have simplified dosing schedules, but have not lowered drug exposure or cost. These limitations have stimulated research into drug-sparing strategies including intermittent therapy and simplified maintenance regimens. Randomized clinical trials have shown greater mortality with intermittent therapy compared with continuous therapy leading to rejection of this strategy. Pilot studies of simplified maintenance therapy with a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor alone have shown more promise, although concerns remain. This article reviews progress in the simplification of antiretroviral therapy, recent clinical trial results and prospects for the future.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Forecasting; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Medication Adherence; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir

The HIV protease inhibitor (PI) ritonavir is a potent, mechanism-based inhibitor of cytochrome P450 CYP3A4, an enzyme that is responsible for metabolizing most HIV PIs. Ritonavir is therefore able to enhance the effectiveness of PI treatment by reducing the pill burden, simplifying dosing regimens and improving therapy adherence. Ritonavir coadministration improves the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of concomitant PIs, and represents a cornerstone of PI-containing regimens. However, ritonavir is associated with undesirable side effects, such as gastrointestinal problems and lipid disturbances. This review summarizes salient features and limitations associated with the use of ritonavir as a PK enhancer, and briefly describes novel PK enhancers that are in development.

Topics: Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Ritonavir

With the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), there have been dramatic reductions in mortality and morbidity of HIV-1-infected patients. Protease inhibitor-based regimens remain a cornerstone of cART owing to their potency and high genetic barrier to resistance. The comparison of atazanavir/ritonavir in naive subjects in combination with tenofovir-emtricitabine versus lopinavir/ritonavir in combination with tenofovir-emtricitabine to assess safety and efficacy (CASTLE) study is a noninferiority trial in which the efficacy, safety and tolerability of atazanavir-ritonavir and lopinavir-ritonavir were compared in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients. The aim of this paper is to review the CASTLE study and the role of atazanavir-ritonavir as an initial treatment in HIV-1-infected patients.

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Deoxycytidine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

This review focuses on the use of tipranavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir and etravirine for the treatment of HIV infection that has become resistant to protease inhibitors and/or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.. Tipranavir/ritonavir and darunavir/ritonavir are boosted protease inhibitors highly active against HIV that has developed mutations that confer resistance to other protease inhibitors. For both drugs, there are scores to predict activity based on a combination of mutations. Best results are obtained when each drug is combined with one and preferably two other completely active antiretrovirals. The interaction profile and toxicity profile is better for darunavir/ritonavir, which in addition has shown positive outcomes in clinical trials of patients with early failure.Etravirine is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor highly active against HIV that has developed mutations that confer resistance to nevirapine or efavirenz. Clinical trials results suggest that etravirine should be used with other active antiretrovirals. Best results for etravirine have been obtained in combination with darunavir/ritonavir in patients with extensive protease inhibitor and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance. The role of etravirine for the treatment of early failure of efavirenz-based or nevirapine-based regimens remains to be elucidated. Resistance to etravirine requires the accumulation of multiple reverse transcriptase mutations different from K103N, which has no impact on activity.. Tipranavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir and etravirine are very important additions to the therapeutic armamentarium against HIV that has become resistant to protease inhibitors and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir (Aptivus) is a selective nonpeptidic HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI) that is used in the treatment of treatment-experienced adults with HIV-1 infection. Tipranavir is administered orally twice daily and must be given in combination with low-dose ritonavir, which is used to boost its bioavailability. The durable efficacy of tipranavir, in combination with low-dose ritonavir (tipranavir/ritonavir 500 mg/200 mg twice daily), has been demonstrated in well designed trials in treatment-experienced adults infected with multidrug-resistant strains of HIV-1. In treatment-experienced adults with HIV-1 infection receiving an optimized background regimen, viral suppression was greater and immunological responses were better with regimens containing tipranavir/ritonavir than with comparator ritonavir-boosted PI-containing regimens. The efficacy benefit appeared to be more marked in patients receiving two fully active drugs in the regimen, with the combination of tipranavir/ritonavir and enfuvirtide (for the first time) appearing to be the most successful. Although tipranavir is generally well tolerated, clinical hepatitis and hepatic decompensation, and intracranial haemorrhage have been associated with the drug. Tipranavir also has a complex drug-interaction profile. Thus, tipranavir, administered with ritonavir, is an effective treatment option for use in the combination therapy of adults with HIV-1 infection who have been previously treated with other antiretroviral drugs.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Lopinavir is a protease inhibitor with high specificity for HIV-1 protease formulated with ritonavir. Numerous clinical trials have shown that lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is highly effective as a component of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens for HIV-1 infection.. In this article we provide an overview of the properties of LPV/r and the experience with its use in HIV-infected adults and adolescents.. We reviewed the literature and selected the most important published articles on LPV/r and the latest posters/communications presented in conferences, with particular attention to the clinical efficacy and tolerability of LPV/r in HIV-1 infected patients.. LPV/r is highly effective as a component of HAART regimens for HIV-1 infection. There is considerable experience with the drug in both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients. In general, LPV/r is well tolerated and its high genetic barrier to resistance favours long-term efficacy.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Patient Compliance; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Tipranavir (TPV), a protease inhibitor, has box warnings for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and hepatotoxicity (including hepatic failure and death). A box warning is a labeling statement about serious adverse events leading to significant injury and/or death. A box warning is the most serious warning placed in the labeling of a prescription medication. As a result of the respective morbidity and mortality associated with ICH and hepatic failure, the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) was searched for reports of these adverse events in HIV-infected patients receiving a tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r)-based regimen. This search comprised part of the FDA's safety analysis for traditional approval. From July 2006 to March 2007, 10 cases of ICH were identified in AERS. From June 2005 to March 2007, 12 cases of liver-associated deaths were identified. One patient experienced liver failure and fatal ICH. Most patients with these events had additional risk factors. Among patients with liver-associated deaths, 3 had HIV-RNA less than 400 copies per milliliter at the time of hepatic failure. Among 10 patients who discontinued TPV/r when hepatic failure developed, median number of days post-TPV/r to death was 23 (range, 2-69 days). Review of AERS did not identify new safety concerns regarding ICH. Among most patients with liver-associated deaths, death appears to occur soon after hepatic failure develops. If considering TPV/r, careful assessment of risk/benefit is suggested for patients at risk for ICH and hepatic failure.

Topics: Adult; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Liver Failure; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Darunavir is the result of wide and in-depth investigation into HIV protease inhibitors (PIs). This drug is a nonpeptide PI, with a distinct chemical structure that, by conferring it drug with enhanced binding affinity and a slower dissociation rate, makes it more potent than the remaining PIs developed to date. Because of its pharmacokinetic characteristics, darunavir must be coadministered with low doses of ritonavir. Furthermore, these characteristics allow oral administration (preferably with meals), once-daily administration in non-resistant HIV strains, and a less complicated treatment regimen with improved convenience in highly varied contexts, including mild-to-moderate renal and hepatic impairment. The potential of darunavir for pharmacological interactions is highly acceptable and this drug can be administered without dose adjustments with almost all antiretroviral agents except maraviroc, lopinavir, saquinavir and tipranavir. There are no problems of pharmacodynamic antagonism with any of these drugs. Cytotoxic doses are well above therapeutic doses, providing a wide safety margin. The spectrum of action is very wide, and darunavir is effective against all subtypes of HIV-1 and against HIV-2 and acts well in mononuclear and monocyte/macrophage cell lines. Darunavir is also active against most HIV strains resistant to the remaining PIs and the robustness of this drug against the known mechanisms of resistance of HIV is also superior to that of the other available PIs. Consequently, the induction and selection of mutations conferring resistance to this drug may be slower and more difficult, resulting in its antiviral effect remaining unchanged for prolonged periods.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Molecular Structure; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Darunavir is a new protease inhibitor. This drug is highly active against wild-type and multiresistant HIV strains, binds strongly to the HIV-1 protease, has extremely high affinity for the protease and, when enhanced by subtherapeutic doses of ritonavir, has a favorable resistance profile differing from that of current protease inhibitors (PIs). After determining the optimal dose, phase IIb clinical trials (POWER studies 1 and 2) observed much higher virological and immunological efficacy with darunavir than with the comparator PIs. The results of a phase III clinical trial (POWER 3) provide further support for the safety and efficacy of darunavir, and the three POWER studies demonstrate the high genetic barrier of this drug against mutations conferring resistance to other PIs, although the baseline sensitivity of darunavir and the specific mutations to this PI influence the virological response. Better therapeutic responses have been obtained when there are two or more antiretroviral drugs active against multiresistant HIV strains. The phase III trials (DUET 1 and 2), in which darunavir was administered with the new nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, etravirine, found that if these two drugs were administered in highly treatment-experienced patients, a large percentage showed suppression of plasma viremia and immunological recovery. These data have been supported by the results of the BENCHMARK studies, in which darunavir was included in an optimized regimen in a substantial number of patients. In these trials, when darunavir was administered with the integrase inhibitor, raltegravir, undetectable viral loads both in the raltegravir arm and in the control group were substantially improved with respect to the overall results obtained in the control group.

Topics: Adult; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Darunavir; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viremia

Darunavir, previously known as TMC-114, is a new protease inhibitor (PI) with a high affinity for the HIV-1 protease and strong ability to inhibit its action, even in mutated forms. Consequently, this drug is considered to have great intrinsic potency and a high genetic barrier. At the time of writing, data on the tolerability and safety of darunavir come mainly from studies of late rescue therapy (POWER, DUET), which have included more than 1,600 patients. Recent data, relating to shorter time periods, are also available from studies in early treatment-experienced patients (TITAN) and in treatment-naïve patients (ARTEMIS), increasing experience to a further 600 patients. Lastly, more than 4,000 patients who have received darunavir through the Expanded Access Program have allowed the drug's generally good safety and tolerability profile to be defined. In the studies performed to date, darunavir has been well tolerated, with a better profile than that of the PIs used in control groups in terms of adverse effects such as diarrhea, gastrointestinal tolerability and lipid alterations. Moreover, to date, no unexpected severe adverse effects have been reported.

Topics: Adult; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyslipidemias; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Incidence; Lopinavir; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides

Darunavir is a new HIV protease inhibitor that has been shown to be highly useful in HIV-infected patients. This drug is primarily metabolized by the liver through the cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) isozyme and consequently coadministration with low doses of ritonavir markedly increases exposure and allows both daily doses and pill burden to be reduced. Both darunavir and ritonavir act as inhibitors and substrates of CYP3A4 and may therefore present pharmacological interactions with a large number of drugs commonly used in HIV-infected patients. The present review aims to summarize the main studies that have evaluated drug interactions and to provide recommendations on treatment with darunavir/ritonavir in clinical practice.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Cardiovascular Agents; Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Microsomes, Liver; Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Sulfonamides

The development of antiretroviral therapy (ART) with current triple drug combinations has dramatically reduced morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. However, there is a need for less toxic treatments without sacrificing efficacy, as well as for less expensive drugs to facilitate universal access to this therapy. The protease inhibitors (PI) administered with ritonavir have a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and high genetic barrier and consequently are ideal candidates for use in monotherapy, thus avoiding the toxicity and cost associated with nucleoside analogs, as well as preserving drugs for future options. The promising results of studies performed with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in induction-maintenance regimens in patients without prior failure to PIs encourage research into the cost-effectiveness of LPV/r in monotherapy from the beginning of ART. The few studies performed in this context seem to indicate the following: a) LPV/r monotherapy achieves undetectable viral loads in a large proportion of treatment-naïve patients, b) future treatment options are not compromised in patients not achieving undetectable viral loads since the likelihood of resistance mutations is low and treatment intensification achieves suppression of viral replication, and c) strategies for early detection can probably be considered in patients who will not achieve complete suppression with LPV/r monotherapy. Nevertheless, before LPV/r monotherapy can be considered a first-line option, new studies with larger samples and longer follow-up are required. These studies should pay particular attention to viral replication in areas where PI show less penetration.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Virus Replication

Simplification of triple antiretroviral therapy to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy in patients with well-controlled viremia for prolonged periods (more than 6 months) without prior failure with a protease inhibitor has been proposed as a strategy that could reduce the toxicity and costs of antiretroviral therapy in the long term while also preserving other therapeutic options. The results of several studies are currently available, some of which had a large number of patients and follow-up of up to 4 years. These studies indicate that this strategy is safe and efficacious, thus allowing its clinical use when indicated. This strategy may be especially useful in reducing the costs of treatment in countries with scarce economic resources. The role of LPV/r monotherapy in the prevention and management of lipodystrophy and in improving the selection of patients with an optimal risk-benefit ratio remains to be defined.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost Control; Developing Countries; Drug Combinations; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Lopinavir; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Viremia; Virus Replication

Monotherapy with LPV/r maintains blocked viral replication when used as a simplification strategy from antiretroviral therapy with a boosted protease inhibitor and two nucleoside analogs in patients with an undetectable viral load for at least 6 months. This simplification strategy can be recommended to patients in these circumstances and who are able to maintain near perfect adherence. As recommended by the GESIDA guidelines, LPV/r monotherapy could be offered to patients with undetectable viral loads but who show symptoms or laboratory abnormalities attributable to nucleoside analog toxicity, or co-morbidities such as liver disease or nephropathy; LPV/r monotherapy could also be offered to patients who simply wish to take a lower number of pills. This strategy reduces treatment toxicity and costs, without jeopardizing the patient's future.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Mitochondria; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Virus Replication

Although guidelines for the treatment of HIV-infected patients recommend triple drug antiretroviral therapy, because of the toxicity of these regimens, the complexity of treatment and its costs, other therapeutic options are desirable. Several clinical trials have shown that lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) as a simplification strategy in antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients who maintain suppression of viral replication while receiving conventional treatment regimens is safe and is associated with less toxicity than that due to prolonged exposure to protease inhibitors and nucleoside analogs. The present review summarizes the main results of the various retrospective studies on LPV/r as a simplification strategy of antiretroviral therapy in daily clinical practice.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrimidinones; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Virus Replication

The strategy of induction-maintenance therapy with lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV7r) consists of initiating antiretroviral therapy in a treatment-naïve patient with two nucleosides plus LPV/r. When the patient has achieved an undetectable HIV RNA viral load of < 50 copies/mL for a specified time period, the nucleosides are withdrawn and the patient continues to receive antiretroviral therapy with LPV/r monotherapy. The induction-maintenance strategy with LPV/r has been analyzed in the M03-613 clinical trial. In this trial, antiretroviral-naïve patients were randomized to receive zidovudine/lamivudine plus LPV/r (n = 104) or efavirenz (n = 51). In patients randomized to receive LPV/r who achieved an HIV RNA viral load of < 50 copies/mL for 3 consecutive months, nucleoside therapy was suspended. In an intention-to-treat analysis (missing equals failure), 60% of the patients randomized to receive LPV/r and 63% of those randomized to receive efavirenz maintained an HIV RNA viral load of < 50 copies/mL at 96 weeks of follow-up (p = 0.73; 95% confidence interval for the difference -19% to 13%). Moreover, this study showed that patients randomized to LPV/r experienced less lipoatrophy than those randomized to efavirenz. The M03-613 trial suggests that the induction-maintenance strategy with LPV/r is safe in most patients. However, rates of virological efficacy are lower than those achieved with the simplification strategy. Moreover, this trial demonstrates that LPV/r monotherapy may have major benefits in peripheral fat preservation.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Virus Replication; Zidovudine

Nine clinical trials have analyzed whether the use of lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy could be a valid alternative to triple antiretroviral therapy. Four of these clinical trials included an analysis of risk factors for virological failure. The MONARK study evaluated monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients. The M03-613 trial evaluated monotherapy after a period of induction therapy with triple combination antiretroviral therapy. The study by Sprinz et al and the OK studies evaluated monotherapy as maintenance of virological suppression. The efficacy of monotherapy varied according to the scenario. In the scenario of induction-maintenance, the factors related to virological failure were suboptimal adherence and low baseline CD4 counts. In the scenario of maintenance, the factors related to virological failure were suboptimal adherence, nadir CD4 count and low hemoglobin. In treatment-naive patients, the risk of virological failure increased in patients who did not achieve a viral load of less than 400 copies/ml 4 weeks after initiating treatment and in those infected with non-B subtypes (a factor that was probably also related to suboptimal adherence).

Topics: Anemia; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Hemoglobins; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Patient Compliance; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy has been shown to be an effective alternative, especially in the maintenance of patients previously treated with combination therapy and prolonged virological suppression. LPV/r monotherapy is associated with a greater number of low-level viremia episodes than combination therapy, without resistance mutations being detected in the majority of patients. The incidence of the development of major resistance mutations in the OK pilot and OK04 studies was very low: 0.51 per 100 patients-year, and was mainly related to mutations in positions 46, 54 and 82, which have not compromised other therapeutic options. The contribution of low-level resistance mutations to loss of virological control seems small, and no different from that observed in combination therapy. However, this phenomenon should be studied in larger, long-term trials.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Incidence; Lopinavir; Mutation, Missense; Pilot Projects; Point Mutation; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Viremia

The present article briefly reviews the main types of pharmacoeconomic analyses that evaluate the costs associated with HIV infection and the efficiency of antiretroviral therapy in general. The results of several pharmacoeconomic analyses applied to the selection of antiretroviral drugs in distinct clinical scenarios are also presented. Finally, we analyze the advantages, in terms of efficiency, of lopinavir/ritonavir as induction-maintenance therapy, both in terms of saving the direct costs of treatment and in possibly reducing the costs due to the management of the adverse effects of nucleoside analogs.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost Control; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Direct Service Costs; Drug Combinations; Drug Costs; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; European Union; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Prescription Fees; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Maintenance monotherapy with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is a safe and effective strategy in the short and medium term. To evaluate its effectiveness in the long term, the question of whether a theoretical decrease in the potency of treatment could reduce suppression of viral replication in reservoirs or in biological compartments where LPV/r penetration is lower must be answered. LPV/r penetrates fairly well in the most impenetrable reservoir, the central nervous system. However, the ability to penetrate reservoirs is not essential to achieve efficacy, since the main battlefield in the fight against HIV is the plasma compartment. What can be achieved in this compartment with antiretroviral therapy can be faithfully extrapolated to cerebrospinal fluid and almost always to seminal fluid. What occurs in lymphoid tissue and in intestinal mucosa, whose physiopathology is intensely initiated at the beginning of the disease, is more obscure and difficult to interpret. The marginal problems that might be generated by some reservoirs that harbor HIV and are relatively impermeable to LPV/r would be of little importance in simplification therapy, which is only offered as maintenance monotherapy with LPV/r to clinically stable patients with good immunological and virological control.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Combinations; Female; Genitalia, Male; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Lymphocytes; Lymphoid Tissue; Male; Organ Specificity; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Tissue Distribution; Virus Replication

Atazanavir is a new azapeptide protease inhibitor with a remarkable pharmacokinetic profile, which means it can be administered in only two capsules once per day in combination with other antiretrovirals. Its strong antiviral efficacy is also accompanied by an excellent tolerance profile and no significant increase in cholesterol and triglyceride levels. The immunological and virological response obtained with atazanavir or atazanavir/ritonavir, in naive patients as well as in patients with previous virological failure with other protease inhibitors, is excellent. Atazanavir is an attractive drug for therapeutic simplification. Besides maintaining virological suppression, patients who change from other PI to atazanavir experience reductions in total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides. Preliminary data suggest that simplified maintenance treatment with atazanavir/ritonavir in monotherapy, can effectively maintain virological suppression in selected patients.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyslipidemias; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Treatment Outcome

The characteristics of atazanavir (convenient doses, good tolerance, and excellent lipid profile) makes it an attractive drug to be included in initial regimes. Clinical trials have been performed on patients with no previous antiretroviral treatment, either atazanavir without boost (400 mg once per day) or atazanavir boosted with ritonavir (400/100 mg). Although atazanavir without boost is effective, there is a tendency for a higher number of failures and a higher development of resistant mutations than in patients who fail with boosted atazanavir. Therefore, it is recommended to use boosted atazanavir in patients that start on treatment. In clinical studies, boosted atazanavir can be used with any nucleoside analogue. No pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction problems have been detected with the two nucleoside combinations at fixed doses (tenofovir/FTC, abacavir/3TC). Randomised clinical studies have been carried out that compared atazanavir with other boosted protease inhibitors. In the comparative study with lopinavir/ritonavir administered two times a day, atazanavir/ritonavir once per day demonstrated noninferiority, with a similar efficacy regardless of the patient baseline viral load. The atazanavir/ritonavir virological efficacy did not appear to be affected by the baseline immunological status of the patients, which did influence the lopinavir/ritonavir response. Atazanavir/ritonavir is a useful drug combination in the initial treatment of HIV infected adult patients. Its increased virological and immunological efficacy, together with its ease of administration, good tolerance and excellent lipid profile makes it a PI of choice in these patients.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Virological failure of antiretroviral treatment increases the morbidity and mortality associated with AIDS. With currently available drugs it is possible to achieve an HIV - PVL < 50 copies of aRNA/mL in a significant percentage of patients with virological failure, even in those who accumulate a considerable number of resistant mutations in the viral genome. Compliance continues to be the most significant cause of antiretroviral treatment failure. Atazanavir boosted with ritonavir has clear advantages over other protease inhibitors (PI), such as its administration once per day, low number of tablets and a good tolerance which helps in compliance, as well as a lower metabolic toxicity and a resistances profile different to other PIs. Boosted Atazanavir in rescue treatments would be strongly recommended in patients naive to a PI or when there are < 3 mutations in the basic genotype in positions: 10F/I/V, 16E, 33I/F/V, 46I/L, 60E, 84V, 85 V and 90M of the protease gene, particularly when the patient has problems of compliance to antiretroviral treatment or metabolic disorders, such as dyslipaemia, insulin resistance, fasting blood glucose changes, a cardiovascular risk at 10 years of > 10% or cardiovascular disease.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Synergism; Dyslipidemias; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Oligopeptides; Patient Compliance; Point Mutation; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Atazanavir (ATV) is a protease inhibitor (PI) in which its main qualities, compared to other PI are dosing convenience, good tolerability and excellent metabolic profile. These characteristics makes it more like a nonnucleoside than a PI, but with the increased genetic barrier common to PI. It is indicated in initial treatment, simplification treatment or a change due to toxicity and in first line rescue treatment. The administering of ATV boosted with ritonavir (300/100 mg/d) has been approved in Europe in all clinical situations. In naïve patients it has been combined with practically all the nucleoside analogue pairs and has shown to be as effective as lopinavir/ritonavir and even efavirenz. In the USA, this indication has been approved for almost 5 years and ATV has become the most prescribed PI, while the EMEA has approved it this year. ATV is an optimal drug to replace other antiretrovirals in simplification strategies or changes due to toxicity. In several studies it has been shown that, in patients with good virological control, it can LPV/r or another PI, the therapeutic efficacy being maintained, with excellent tolerance and an improved lipid profile, and decreasing the cardiovascular risk. This strategy is widely used in Spain. In this scenario some patients could benefit from non-boosted ATV treatment (400 mg/d). ATV is an effective and very attractive option in first line rescue treatments in which the virus shows little or no resistance to PI, as its simplicity and tolerability can improve problems with compliance, the main cause of therapeutic failure. In patients with moderate resistance to PI, ATV is as effective as LPV/r. The survival of patients with HIV infection is increasingly longer and factors such as tolerability, cardiovascular risk and the adaptability of the treatment to the lifestyle of the patient, become more important, therefore ATV must play an important role in the treatment of HIV-infection.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cohort Studies; Comorbidity; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Insulin Resistance; Oligopeptides; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

People with HIV infection have metabolic abnormalities that resemble metabolic syndrome (hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and insulin resistance), which is known to predict increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, there is not one underlying cause for these abnormalities and they are not linked to each other. Rather, individual abnormalities can be affected by the host response to HIV itself, specific HIV drugs, classes of HIV drugs, HIV-associated lipoatrophy, or restoration to health. Furthermore, one component of metabolic syndrome, increased waist circumference, occurs less frequently in HIV infection. Thus, HIV infection supports the concept that metabolic syndrome does not represent a syndrome based on a common underlying pathophysiology. As might be predicted from these findings, the prevalence of CVD is higher in people with HIV infection. It remains to be determined whether CVD rates in HIV infection are higher than might be predicted from traditional risk factors, including smoking.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol, HDL; Comorbidity; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Hypertriglyceridemia; Indinavir; Metabolic Syndrome; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Terminology as Topic

Recommendations for a highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in either pretreated patients or symptomatic patients with an AIDS-defining event are based on a combination of three or more agents from different antiretroviral classes including two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with at least one protease inhibitor. The majority of currently available protease inhibitors are coadministered with low-dose ritonavir as a pharmacoenhancer that significantly increases protease inhibitor plasma concentrations. Atazanavir is a highly active azapeptide inhibitor of the HIV protease. It was the first, and to date the only, protease inhibitor designed to be applied once daily (q.d.) and is expected to overcome the problems of earlier agents of this class of drugs, such as unfavorable adverse events like hyperlipidemia, diarrhea and lipodystrophy. Atazanavir, formerly known as BMS-232632, can be dosed either at 400 mg q.d. without a pharmacoenhancer as first-line HIV therapy or combined with ritonavir as atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg q.d. for therapy-experienced patients. The pharmacoenhancing effect of ritonavir on atazanavir resulted in a potent, clinically effective and well-tolerated antiretroviral drug with high plasma concentrations and a sufficient genetic barrier to viral resistance. Nevertheless, noninferiority to lopinavir/ritonavir-containing HAART could not be shown when atazanavir was given unboosted in pretreated patients in the AI424-043 study. When atazanavir was boosted with low-dose ritonavir its efficacy was comparable to that of lopinavir/ritonavir in non-naive patients (AI424-045 study). Additionally, specific side effects were identified during clinical practice, such as an increased rate of patients with jaundice, and, more recently, genetic risk factors causing hyperbilirubinemia. Atazanavir inhibits glucuronyltransferase, an enzyme responsible for the metabolism of bilirubin in liver, thus increasing unconjugated bilirubin levels in blood. However, atazanavir itself also enhances plasma concentrations of other coadministered HIV-1 protease inhibitors, so that its use as a combination partner in boosted double protease inhibitor combinations, with or without the addition of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, is being evaluated. Unboosted atazanavir is approved for first-line HIV therapy in adults in the United States, and atazanavir/ritonavir is recommended for the second-line therapy of HIV-1 infection in adult HI

Topics: Animals; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir

The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic overview of the literature on adrenal suppression and Cushing's syndrome secondary to an interaction between inhaled/intranasal fluticasone and ritonavir. The clinical presentation, diagnosis and management will be discussed.. A literature search using Medline and EMBASE and a search of abstracts of the three previous years of major HIV-related conferences were carried out.. There were 25 cases (15 adult and 10 paediatric) of significant adrenal suppression secondary to an interaction between ritonavir and inhaled fluticasone, and three cases involving ritonavir and intranasal fluticasone. Cases with other steroids were not reported; however, there were cases of adrenal suppression with itraconazole [also a potent cytochrome p (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor] and inhaled budesonide. Clinicians need to differentiate between antiretroviral-induced lipodystrophy syndrome and iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome secondary to glucocorticoid use. Long-term fluticasone and ritonavir should be avoided. If ritonavir is required, another inhaled steroid such as low-dose budesonide or beclomethasone can be used cautiously. Upon discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids, close monitoring for symptoms of adrenal insufficiency is warranted. The need for steroid replacement therapy at physiological doses should be assessed.. The combination of ritonavir and fluticasone should be avoided. Budesonide, beclomethasone, triamcinolone and flunisolide appear to be safer options.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Child; Child, Preschool; Cushing Syndrome; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluticasone; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infant; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir

Lopinavir is a protease inhibitor (PI) for the treatment of HIV infection that was specifically designed to overcome the shortcomings of earlier agents in this class. It is the only PI coformulated with ritonavir, whose pharmacological boosting effect results in a highly potent, well-tolerated, clinically effective antiretroviral agent with a high genetic barrier to resistance. Lopinavir/ritonavir is a recommended first-line option for antiretroviral-naive patients initiating PI-based therapy, and has an equally important role in the management of treatment-experienced individuals. Its favorable pharmacological and clinical characteristics have recently prompted investigators to explore its potential novel applications in HIV monotherapy and double-boosted regimens.

Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

HIV protease inhibitors are an integral part of effective anti-HIV therapy. The drugs block HIV protease, prevent proper packaging of HIV virions, and decrease the HIV viral burden in the peripheral blood of infected individuals. In addition to direct anti-viral effects, the HIV protease inhibitors also modulate apoptosis. A growing body of work demonstrates the anti-apoptotic effects of HIV protease inhibitors on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells during HIV infection. The mechanism of this apoptosis inhibition is supported by several proposed hypotheses for how they alter the fate of the cell, including preventing adenine nucleotide translocator pore function, which consequently prevents loss of mitochondrial transmembrane potential. More recently, the anti-apoptotic effects of the HIV protease inhibitors have been tested in non-HIV, non-immune cell, whereby protease inhibitors prevent apoptosis, and disease in animal models of sepsis, hepatitis, pancreatitis and stroke. Interestingly, when HIV protease inhibitors are used at supra-therapeutic concentrations, they exert pro-apoptotic effects. This has been demonstrated in a number of tumor models. Although it is unclear how HIV protease inhibitors can induce apoptosis at increased concentrations, future research will define the targets of the immunomodulation and reveal the full clinical potential of this intriguing class of drugs.

Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Hippocampus; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Mitochondrial ADP, ATP Translocases; Nelfinavir; Pancreatitis; Ritonavir; Signal Transduction; Stroke; T-Lymphocytes

Recommendations for a highly active antiretroviral therapy in either pretreated patients or symptomatic patients with an AIDS-defining event include at least one protease inhibitor. The majority of currently available protease inhibitors are coadministrated with low-dose ritonavir, a pharmacoenhancer that significantly increases protease inhibitor plasma concentrations. In the class of protease inhibitors lopinavir plus ritonavir is the only coformulation. This coformulation was designed to overcome the problems of earlier agents of this class of drugs concerning unfavorable pharmacokinetics with a higher frequency of dosing and therapy failure. The pharmacoenhancing effect of ritonavir on lopinavir resulted in a highly potent, clinically effective antiretroviral drug with a high genetic barrier to viral resistance. Safety concerns have taken a backseat, focusing instead on the favorable efficacy of lopinavir, which recently led to the evaluation of its use in boosted double-protease-inhibitor regimens, as a once-daily application and even in HIV monotherapy. Nevertheless, since HIV infection became a chronic but controllable disease, side effects like metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease have begun to draw increased attention in the long-term treatment with protease inhibitors. Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir is available as a soft gelatin capsule (133.33/33.33 mg), liquid formulation (80/20 mg/ml) and recently approved melt-extrusion tablet (200/50 mg). Lopinavir/ritonavir is recommended for first- and second-line therapy in HIV-1 infection, in children as well as adolescents and adults.

Topics: Animals; Drug Combinations; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Despite the unprecedented pace of development of drugs for the treatment of a viral disease and the unquestionable efficacy of antiretroviral therapy, there is a need for less toxic and cheaper regimens that could simplify the treatment of HIV infection without sacrificing efficacy. The favorable pharmacokinetic profile and the high genetic barrier of boosted protease inhibitors make them ideal candidates for use as monotherapy. Given the encouraging results of available studies on lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy in patients with no prior failure with protease inhibitors, it may be warranted to conduct trials to investigate the cost-effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy as second-line therapy in resource-constrained settings where virologic monitoring is not feasible. In addition, larger trials with longer follow up, with particular attention to the potential consequences of viral replication in sites where the penetration of protease inhibitors may be poor, are needed before this strategy can be considered for routine use.

Topics: Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Indinavir is one of four first-generation HIV-protease inhibitors and was the most popular amongst them in the late 1990s. It was initially licensed for use alone, given three times daily, administered away from meals and together with at least 1.5 litres of fluid per day. In clinical practice, it became common for clinicians to prescribe it with a ritonavir pharmacokinetic 'boost' to remove the food restriction, reduce the pill burden and enable a more convenient twice-daily dosing schedule. However, at a ritonavir-boosted dosing schedule of indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg b.i.d., the regimen proved toxic and poorly tolerable, and its use diminished as newer, better tolerated PIs became available. Recent research has suggested that ritonavir-boosted indinavir administered at lower doses, particularly indinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg b.i.d., retains potency and is considerably less toxic. As a result, there is interest in its application in resource-constrained settings.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Ritonavir

Despite huge advances in terms of the impact of antiretroviral therapy on HIV-related morbidity and mortality patients continue to fail therapy. We discuss the reasons why failure occurs including primary or transmitted resistance, poor adherence, toxicity and drug potency. We performed a review of PubMed, Medline and recent conference abstracts for information on antiretroviral toxicity, adherence, failure and transmitted resistance. Most first-line regimens are now similar in potency and, assuming susceptibility to the selected regimen determined by genotypic resistance testing, tolerability and toxicity are the key issues differentiating currently available agents. New developments such as pharmacogenomics have already proven useful in predicting toxicity and may play an increasingly important role. With all regimens good adherence remains the key to successful therapy; minimising toxicity and other barriers to adherence wherever possible is crucial.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; Humans; Patient Compliance; Ritonavir; Treatment Failure

For over a decade, indinavir has been approved for the treatment of HIV/AIDS; however, following the introduction of new protease inhibitors (PIs) with improved safety and pharmacologic profiles, its use in developed countries has become almost obsolete. In contrast, in resource-limited settings where the majority of people living with HIV/AIDS reside, indinavir is part of the most affordable PI-based highly active antiretroviral treatment regimen. A major drawback of indinavir use is renal toxicity, but low-dose indinavir plus ritonavir (400/100 mg) twice daily is both efficacious and tolerable. Similar low dosing levels in children have also proven successful, but data in pregnant women remains limited. Due to its low cost and proven efficacy indinavir remains a key component of HIV/AIDS treatment in resource-limited settings.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Area Under Curve; Developing Countries; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Molecular Structure; Ritonavir

Tipranavir is a nonpeptidic protease inhibitor that has activity against human immunodeficiency virus strains resistant to multiple protease inhibitors. Tipranavir 500 mg is coadministered with ritonavir 200 mg. Tipranavir is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and, when combined with ritonavir in vitro, causes inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A in addition to induction of glucuronidase and the drug transporter P-glycoprotein. As a result, drug-drug interactions between tipranavir-ritonavir and other coadministered drugs are a concern. In addition to interactions with other antiretrovirals, tipranavir-ritonavir interactions with antifungals, antimycobacterials, oral contraceptives, statins, and antidiarrheals have been specifically evaluated. For other drugs such as antiarrhythmics, antihistamines, ergot derivatives, selective serotonin receptor agonists (or triptans), gastrointestinal motility agents, erectile dysfunction agents, and calcium channel blockers, interactions can be predicted based on studies with other ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors and what is known about tipranavir-ritonavir CYP and P-glycoprotein utilization. The highly complex nature of drug interactions dictates that cautious prescribing should occur with narrow-therapeutic-index drugs that have not been specifically studied. Thus, the known interaction potential of tipranavir-ritonavir is reported, and in vitro and in vivo data are provided to assist clinicians in predicting interactions not yet studied. As more clinical interaction data are generated, better insight will be gained into the specific mechanisms of interactions with tipranavir-ritonavir.

Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Fosamprenavir is a protease inhibitor (PI) approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Fosamprenavir is a prodrug of amprenavir developed to reduce the pill burden yet maintain the unique resistance pattern and efficacy associated with amprenavir. In a head-to-head, noninferiority trial in antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-infected patients, the antiviral efficacy and tolerability of ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir was not inferior to ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, when the PIs were combined with two other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. There are fewer studies published about fosamprenavir use in antiretroviral treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients. The high genetic barrier to the development of resistance to fosamprenavir and the low level of cross-resistance between ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir and other PI regimens are notable. As with amprenavir, gastrointestinal disturbance and rash are the most frequent short-term treatment-limiting events with fosamprenavir. Treatment with ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir can produce a durable response. To date, fosamprenavir is one of the recommended preferred PI components for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients.

Topics: Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exanthema; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Organophosphates; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Antiretroviral regimens based on human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitors (PIs) are hampered by a number of side effects, mainly diarrhea, dyslipidemia, an increased risk of cardiovascular events and diabetes, and lipoaccumulation in the neck and abdomen. Although challenged by these potential untoward effects, PIs are still the cornerstone of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) because of their potency and high genetic barrier. Atazanavir (ATV) is the first once-daily azapeptide HIV-1 PI and can be boosted by ritonavir. The efficacy of ritonavir-boosted ATV (ATV/r)-containing regimens in patients harboring drug-resistant variants is not statistically different from that of the reference PI lopinavir/ritonavir. In Italy, ATV, either boosted or unboosted, is licensed only for drug-experienced patients. However, in clinical trials ATV/r has proved to be effective in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected individuals. There is no evidence that ATV/r-based regimens lead to the selection of mutations conferring cross-resistance to other PIs, and this drug combination has now been included among those recommended by the International AIDS Society-USA Panel and the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Panel as initial treatment when a boosted-PI-based regimen is preferred to a NNRTI-based regimen.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir

Effective combination therapy for HIV/AIDS is now available and has made a major impact on HIV-related mortality and morbidity. The effects of even the most active of antiretroviral drugs are hampered by drug resistance and tolerability issues. Darunavir (TMC114), coadministered with low-dose ritonavir (darunavir/r), is a new HIV-1 protease inhibitor that has been designed to be active against both wild-type and multi-resistant virus. Darunavir/r 600/100 mg b.i.d. in a combination antiretroviral regimen in the POWER trials has provided treatment-experienced patients with substantially greater virological and immunological benefits compared with standard of care. This article reviews the presently available data on darunavir, its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions and clinical trial results, as well as examining darunavir from a health economic perspective.

Topics: Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Darunavir; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Quality of Life; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir is a recently approved nonpeptidic protease inhibitor specifically developed for the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in treatment-experienced patients with protease inhibitor-resistant infection. It is active against a wide range of drug-resistant laboratory- and patient-derived isolates. Tipranavir requires pharmacokinetic boosting by ritonavir (200 mg) to achieve therapeutic levels with twice-daily dosing and must be administered with food for optimal absorption. It is a potent protease inhibitor with a unique drug-resistance profile that offers advantages in the management of cases of multidrug-resistant HIV infection. Tipranavir (in combination with ritonavir) is both an inhibitor and inducer of cytochrome p450, with significant potential for drug-drug interactions, and therefore, it must be used cautiously when administered to patients who are receiving other drugs. Evolution of drug resistance after treatment failure with tipranavir is complex and is not yet fully understood. There is limited overlap in the resistance mutations that predict response to tipranavir and another new protease inhibitor, darunavir, which is active against drug-resistant isolates. Tipranavir is associated with elevations in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, as well as elevated cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and can cause the typical gastrointestinal adverse effects associated with all protease inhibitors.

Topics: Cholesterol; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Triglycerides

Antiretroviral drug combinations that include two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and a protease inhibitor (PI) can suppress HIV replication to undetectable levels, improving the prognosis of HIV-infected individuals. The aim of therapy is complete virological suppression, with a current goal of <50 copies/mL HIV-1 RNA, in order to minimize the occurrence of drug resistance. Improved understanding of the pharmacology of PIs, primarily the importance of adequate drug exposure, has led to the widespread administration of PIs combined with a low 'boosting' dose of ritonavir. The combination of PIs with ritonavir can improve treatment responses in both treatment-naive and -experienced patients. Boosted PIs are an important therapeutic option for HIV and extensive data exist supporting their use. Use of individual agents should be guided by a resistance test at all stages of treatment from naive through to highly treatment-experienced patients. Currently, seven boosted PIs have both US and European licensing approval: indinavir, saquinavir, lopinavir, fosamprenavir, atazanavir, tipranavir and darunavir (formerly TMC114). The preferred first-line option in the USA is lopinavir. Many of the older PIs are less effective and/or have less favourable tolerability profiles. Emergent PI resistance is a major challenge in treatment, and it can be accelerated by partial suppression of viral load through inappropriate therapy combinations. Using the newer boosted PIs, which have more robust resistance profiles, with an optimized background regimen may increase the likelihood of complete viral suppression. This review discusses the relative strengths and weaknesses of boosted PIs in current practice.

Topics: Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; United States

As formulations and combinations of drugs to treat HIV infection improve, physicians are better able to offer therapies that reduce pill burden while maintaining safety and effective viral control. Saquinavir mesylate, the first protease inhibitor (PI) approved by the FDA, was recently reformulated to reduce pill burden and is meant to be used in regimens boosted with low-dose ritonavir. This article reviews ritonavir-enhanced or "boosted" saquinavir regimens and the clinical trials using this PI combination and discusses potential advantages of and opportunities with the current use of these regimens.

Topics: Biological Availability; Capsules; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Drug Combinations; Half-Life; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Inhibition of viral assembly (protease inhibitors) and of fusion of viral and target membranes (fusion inhibitors) are general approaches to antiviral treatment, not specific for HIV. Nonetheless, the agents that induce these phenomena are most often specific for a given virus or virus family. Drugs developed for HIV treatment were reevaluated for use against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) during and after the epidemic in 2003, in view of the absence of any other available treatment. Of the protease and entry inhibitors approved for treating HIV-infected patients, none was effective against SARS-CoV, although in vitro activity against this virus was reported for the protease inhibitor lopinavir/ritonavir, in results that have not been confirmed in the most recent studies. The epidemiologic methods used to assess this drug's efficacy are not robust. Preliminary results for SARS treatment with protease and entry inhibitors, although at early stages of development, are promising.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiviral Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Protease Inhibitors; Pyrimidinones; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome; Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus; Viral Fusion Proteins

Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) is a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) containing lopinavir and low-dose ritonavir. It is approved for use in combination with other antiretroviral drugs for the treatment of HIV infection in adults, adolescents and children aged >or=6 months (in the US) or >or=2 years (in the EU).Lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) is generally well tolerated and has shown durable virological efficacy in clinical trials in ART-naive and -experienced patients with virological failure. Lopinavir/ritonavir is one of the preferred PIs for first-line treatment of HIV infection in adults, adolescents and children, according to US and British guidelines, reflecting its comparatively better virological efficacy than nelfinavir and low incidence of de novo resistance during long-term treatment. Lopinavir/ritonavir-based treatment may produce a more effective virological response than other PI-based regimens in single PI-experienced, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-naive patients. In PI- and NNRTI-experienced patients, atazanavir/saquinavir was inferior to lopinavir/ritonavir; further well designed trials are required to determine the comparative efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir versus other PIs such as ritonavir-boosted atazanavir, or fosamprenavir or tipranavir in these patients. Lopinavir/ritonavir is more likely than atazanavir (alone or boosted) or nelfinavir to cause hypertriglyceridaemia and is associated with a higher incidence of hypercholesterolaemia than atazanavir (alone or boosted). The new lopinavir/ritonavir tablet coformulation offers a reduced pill count and lack of food interaction, and ART-naive patients in the US and Canada, who are not receiving efavirenz, nelfinavir, nevirapine or amprenavir, may benefit from convenient once-daily administration of lopinavir/ritonavir. Thus, lopinavir/ritonavir is a convenient, effective option for use in the treatment of HIV infection in ART-naive and -experienced adults, adolescents and children.

Topics: HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

As we approach the completion of the first 25 years of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, there have been dramatic improvements in the care of patients with HIV infection. These have prolonged life and decreased morbidity. There are twenty currently available antiretrovirals approved in the United States for the treatment of this infection. The medications, including their pharmacokinetic properties, side effects, and dosing are reviewed. In addition, the current approach to the use of these medicines is discussed. We have included a section addressing common comorbid conditions including hepatitis B and C along with tuberculosis.

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Viral; Enfuvirtide; Female; Genotype; Hepatitis B; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; Humans; Mutation; Peptide Fragments; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Protease Inhibitors; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Zidovudine

Amprenavir is an HIV-1 protease inhibitor, the first in vitro activity studies of which were published in 1995. During in vivo development, it became clear that the pharmacokinetics of the drug would result in patients taking a large number of pills daily. The first comparative studies of amprenavir versus other protease inhibitors showed it had comparatively weak activity. Thus, studies using low doses of ritonavir to enhance the pharmacokinetic profile of amprenavir were first communicated in 2000. Only a small number of clinical trials in HIV-1-infected patients have been published. The pharmacokinetics of amprenavir have been documented in both healthy individuals and in HIV-1-infected patients. Amprenavir trough plasma concentrations increase 3- to 10-fold and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increases 2- to 3-fold when using amprenavir 450 or 600 mg combined with ritonavir 100mg twice daily. Peak concentrations of amprenavir are less influenced by ritonavir coadministration, with a 1- to 2-fold increase. As there is no pharmacokinetic advantage to increasing ritonavir doses, the combination has only been used with low doses of ritonavir (100mg twice daily or 200 mg once or twice daily). Concomitant use of currently available non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs)--efavirenz or nevirapine--is possible when amprenavir is coadministered with ritonavir, despite the pharmacokinetic interactions described when they are used with amprenavir alone. Fosamprenavir (GW 433908) is a prodrug of amprenavir primarily metabolised to amprenavir in the epithelial cells of the intestine. At steady state, plasma trough concentrations and AUC are slightly greater with fosamprenavir (two pills of 700 mg twice daily) than amprenavir (eight soft gel capsules of 150 mg twice daily). The clinical adverse effects of amprenavir are similar whether administered unboosted or in combination with ritonavir. Skin rashes do not appear to be more frequent. With regard to lipid profiles, the addition of ritonavir to amprenavir induces an increase in cholesterol and triglyceride levels; however, prospective comparative studies are lacking. In short-term prospective trials in antiretroviral-naive individuals, virological suppression with highly active antiretroviral therapy containing amprenavir plus ritonavir is similar to or higher than with unboosted amprenavir, with a smaller pill intake. Few comparative data are available in treatment-experienced

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Organophosphates; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

The rationale, advantages, and disadvantages of attempting to enhance the efficacy of a primary protease inhibitor (PI) with ritonavir in the management of HIV infection, especially in patients who have previously undergone highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), are discussed.. PIs are pivotal components of the HAART regimens used to fight HIV infection. Long-term viral suppression remains a major clinical challenge. Certain pharmacologic features of many PIs, such as their limited oral bioavailability, necessitate burdensome dosage schedules, creating a barrier to patient adherence. Compliance may be further compromised by adverse events. Any factors that undermine adherence may increase the risk that plasma drug concentrations will be suboptimal and that viral resistance and subsequent treatment failure will develop. The pharmacokinetic enhancement, or "boosting," of PI levels with low-dose ritonavir may increase PI potency and efficacy, as well as decrease the emergence of viral resistance, reduce the pill burden, and simplify administration. A number of clinical studies suggest that PI-boosted regimens are safe and effective in HIV-infected patients who have been previously treated with antiretroviral agents, but more research is needed.. PI boosting with ritonavir can improve PI pharmacokinetics so that potency and efficacy are increased and regimens are simplified, thereby potentially reducing antiretroviral resistance and promoting patient adherence.

Topics: Biological Availability; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Ritonavir; United States

Protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy has been shown to decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. However, many of the available agents in this class suffer shortcomings, including poor tolerability, difficult dosing regimens, and variable drug concentrations which may lead to generation of viral resistance. Lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) has been designed specifically to address some of these shortcomings. Excellent therapeutic efficacy has been documented for lopinavir/ritonavir in multiple clinical trials in both antiretroviral-naive and -experienced patients. Development of resistance is a rare event in persons initiating therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir as their first protease inhibitor. The main side effects associated with lopinavir/ritonavir are gastrointestinal disturbances and elevations of serum lipids. Current antiretroviral therapy guidelines list lopinavir/ritonavir as the consensus first-line protease inhibitor recommended in the initial therapeutic regimen in persons infected with HIV-1.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Tipranavir is a non-peptidic HIV-1 protease inhibitor. It binds strongly and selectively, has a favourable resistance profile, and is administered orally twice daily with a subtherapeutic dosage of ritonavir in a 'boosted' regimen (TPV/r) in order to increase its bioavailability. Analysis of clinical isolates from treatment-experienced patients identified the following tipranavir resistance-associated HIV protease mutations: L10V, I13V, K20M/R/V, L33F, E35G, M36I, K43T, M46L, I47V, I54A/M/V, Q58E, H69K, T74P, V82L/T, N83D, I84V. In two large, well designed phase III trials in protease inhibitor-experienced, HIV-infected patients, the RESIST (Randomised Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in multidrug reSistant patients with Tipranavir)-1 and -2 studies, oral TPV/r 500mg/200mg twice daily achieved a significantly better virological response after 24 weeks than standard ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors. This held true for the proportion of patients achieving a >or=1 log(10) decrease in plasma HIV-RNA levels (viral load) [42% and 41% vs 22% and 15%; both p < 0.0001; primary endpoint] and other virological parameters (the proportion of patients with undetectable viral load and total viral load reduction). In addition, a significantly larger increase in CD4+ cell count was achieved with TPV/r than comparator regimens in these trials. The most common adverse events in clinical trials of tipranavir were gastrointestinal. The incidence of treatment discontinuation because of adverse events in the RESIST trials was 8% (pooled data).

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Atazanavir is a novel and potent protease inhibitor that differs from other protease inhibitors because of its good gastrointestinal tolerability, once-daily dosing, low pill burden and it does not seem to cause insulin resistance or lipid elevations in short-term use. Atazanavir produces an increase in indirect bilirubin levels, which is not related to hepatotoxicity. The incidence of atazanavir-related hyperbilirubinaemia does not seem to be increased in hepatitis B or C coinfection. I50L is atazanavir's signature mutation. It has been shown in previously treated patients that resistance is likely when three or more protease inhibitor resistance-related primary mutations are present.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Atazanavir Sulfate; Contraindications; Drug Approval; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Oligopeptides; Patient Compliance; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir

The importance of combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infection has been well established. However, many available agents suffer shortcomings that limit their clinical value, including adverse effects, difficult dosing requirements and rapid development of resistance. Lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) is a member of the protease inhibitor class, specifically designed to address some of these deficits. The drug is a coformulation of lopinavir with low-dose ritonavir, exploiting a favourable drug-drug interaction between the two that yields sustained increases in plasma levels of lopinavir. In large-scale clinical trials, lopinavir/ritonavir has demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy when compared with other protease inhibitors. It exerts potent antiviral activity in both treatment-naive and experienced patients with an acceptable incidence of adverse effects. De novo development of resistance has not been described in large clinical trials with patients naive to antiretroviral therapy. Lopinavir/ritonavir has recently been approved for once-daily dosing in antiretroviral-naive patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Contraindications; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Dosage Forms; Drug Approval; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Viral Load

The efficacy of HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy is now well established and has provided benefits to many patients with HIV infection. Atazanavir is a new azapeptide PI compound that was recently approved in the US and Europe. Atazanavir is recommended in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Atazanavir is rapidly absorbed and administration of a single dose of atazanavir with a light meal resulted in a 70% increase in area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC); therefore atazanavir should be taken with food. Atazanavir is 86% bound to human serum protein independently of concentration. Concentration in body fluids appeared to be lower than plasma concentration. Like other PIs, atazanavir is extensively metabolised by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isoenzymes. The mean terminal elimination half-life in healthy volunteers was approximately 7 hours at steady state following administration of atazanavir 400 mg daily with a light meal. When atazanavir 300 mg was coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg on a once-daily dosage regimen, atazanavir AUC from 0 to 24 hours and minimum plasma concentration were increased by 3- to 4-fold and approximately 10-fold, respectively, compared with atazanavir 300 mg alone. Therefore, ritonavir boosted atazanavir regimen (ritonavir 100 mg and atazanavir 300 mg once daily) is increasingly favoured in some patients. Efavirenz, a potent CYP3A inducer, decreased atazanavir concentrations by 75% and, unexpectedly, tenofovir, a nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor, decreased atazanavir concentrations by 25%. Average predose concentrations in HIV-infected patients who received atazanavir 400mg once daily were 273 ng/mL, which was believed to be several-fold higher than protein-binding corrected 50% inhibitory concentration of wild-type viruses. In HIV-infected patients who received once-daily ritonavir (100mg) boosted atazanavir (300 mg), mean (+/-SD) trough concentration was 862 (+/-838) ng/mL. Several clinical trials showed the efficacy of atazanavir 400 mg once daily with a nucleoside analogue backbone in antiretroviral-naive patients. The atazanavir 300/ritonavir 100 mg once-daily combination coadministered with other antiretrovirals showed the efficacy of this strategy in patients receiving efavirenz or in moderately antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients. Recommended once-daily doses of atazanavir taken with fo

Topics: Adenine; Age Factors; Alkynes; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Liver; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Oxazines; Pyridines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sex Factors; Tenofovir

Ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) regimens have provided substantial benefits in the treatment of HIV/AIDS, resulting in improved clinical outcomes. However, treatment toxicities often affect adherence and may influence outcomes. Dyslipidemia is highly prevalent in many patients who receive a boosted PI regimen. The mechanism underlying dyslipidemia is probably multifactorial and may differ among the individual PIs. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and events appears to be higher in patients treated with boosted PIs, and as long-term survival increases in HIV-infected persons, the long-term effect of dyslipidemia becomes a growing concern. The practitioner must consider the possibility of these adverse effects when choosing the antiretroviral regimen that best suits each patient. Until future studies define the optimal approach, an evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors and treatment of those risk factors according to evidence-based guidelines are warranted.

Topics: Coronary Disease; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Ritonavir

Tipranavir is a newly approved protease inhibitor that belongs to the class of 4-hydroxy-5,6-dyhydro-2-pyrones. It exhibits potent in vitro activity against both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 and HIV-2, including clinical isolates with multiple protease inhibitor-resistant mutations. Tipranavir requires coadministration with ritonavir to achieve clinically meaningful serum concentration. In randomized, phase III, open-label trials, it was found to be superior to the currently available boosted protease inhibitors in highly treatment-experienced patients with multiple protease inhibitor mutations. Thus, it provides a welcome new option for salvage antiretroviral therapy. The most common adverse effects associated with tipranavir are diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. Common laboratory abnormalities include elevations of total cholesterol, triglycerides and liver enzymes.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; HIV-2; Humans; Molecular Structure; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides

Boosted protease inhibitor regimens combine ritonavir with a second, 'boosted' protease inhibitor to enhance patient exposure to the latter agent, thereby preventing or overcoming resistance and allowing less frequent dosing, potentially improving adherence. The advantages offered by ritonavir boosting are primarily attributable to the drug's pharmacokinetic properties. Ritonavir's inhibition of the cytochrome P-450 CYP3A4 enzyme reduces the metabolism of concomitantly administered protease inhibitors and changes their pharmacokinetic parameters, including area under the curve (AUC), maximum concentration (Cmax), minimum concentration (Cmin) and half-life (t1/2). As a result, the bioavailability of the boosted protease inhibitor is increased and improved penetration into HIV reservoirs may be achieved. Boosted protease inhibitor regimens that utilize a low dose of ritonavir (100-200 mg) appear to offer the best balance of efficacy and tolerability. At this dose, ritonavir boosts the bioavailability of the second protease inhibitor without contributing significantly to the side effect profile of the regimen. In clinical trials, regimens boosted with low dose ritonavir have demonstrated high levels of viral suppression in both antiretroviral naïve patients and patients who previously failed antiretroviral therapy, including protease inhibitor therapy. Side effects observed have generally been similar to those associated with the boosted protease inhibitor. Based upon their enhanced drug exposure and demonstrated efficacy, the boosted ritonavir regimens should be among the first options considered for use in clinical practice.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Biological Availability; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir

There are currently (July, 2002) six protease inhibitors approved for the treatment of HIV infection, each of which can be classified as peptidomimetic in structure. These agents, when used in combination with other antiretroviral agents, produce a sustained decrease in viral load, often to levels below the limits of quantifiable detection, and a significant reconstitution of the immune system. Therapeutic regimens containing one or more HIV protease inhibitors thus provide a highly effective method for disease management. The important role of protease inhibitors in HIV therapy, combined with numerous challenges remaining in HIV treatment, have resulted in a continued effort both to optimize regimens using the existing agents and to identify new protease inhibitors that may provide unique properties. This review will provide an overview of the discovery and clinical trials of the currently approved HIV protease inhibitors, followed by an examination of important aspects of therapy, such as pharmacokinetic enhancement, resistance and side effects. A description of new peptidomimetic compounds currently being investigated in the clinic and in preclinical discovery will follow.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dipeptides; Furans; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Models, Molecular; Molecular Mimicry; Molecular Structure; Nelfinavir; Oligopeptides; Organophosphates; Peptides; Phenylbutyrates; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides; Urethane

Topics: Adjuvants, Immunologic; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Ritonavir; Therapeutic Equivalency

Although protease inhibitors (PIs) have dramatically improved outcomes in HIV-infected patients, half still fail treatment with PI-based combination therapy. Genetic pressure from incomplete viral suppression rapidly selects for HIV variants with protease gene mutations that confer reduced susceptibility to PI drugs. A number of specific amino acid substitutions have been associated with PI resistance. However, high-level resistance to individual PIs requires the accumulation of several primary and secondary mutations, developing along drug-specific, step-wise pathways. HIV variants resistant to saquinavir and ritonavir usually contain L90M and V82A substitutions, respectively. Indinavir resistance may be linked to substitutions at positions 46 or 82. Resistance to nelfinavir is primarily associated with D30N but may alternatively be found with L90M. Resistance during exposure to amprenavir can follow development of I50V, which also may confer resistance to lopinavir. Failure during treatment with atazanavir is closely linked to 150L. The overlapping of these pathways can lead to multiple-PI resistance, limiting therapeutic options in antiretroviral-experienced patients. Reduced susceptibility to more than one PI is most likely to be associated with amino acid substitutions at six positions: 10, 46, 54, 82, 84 and 90. Other mutations (D30N, G48V, I50V or I50L) are relatively specific for particular PIs and are less likely to produce cross resistance. Certain resistance mutations selected by exposure to one PI may actually increase susceptibility to others. Patients newly diagnosed with HIV infection are increasingly found to harbour virus that is resistant to the more commonly used drugs. Newer PIs may select for mutations that result in less cross resistance with older agents.

Topics: Amino Acid Substitution; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genetic Variation; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Mutation; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

When boosted by ritonavir, protease inhibitors trough concentration and inhibitory quotient are increased, thus enhancing their therapeutic margin. Although the inhibitory quotient is less high when patients are pre-treated and have developed resistance mutations, it nonetheless offers a precious alternative for patients experiencing therapeutic failure. Despite great inter-individual variability in virologic responses, boosted protease inhibitors can be compared to boosted lopinavir. The latter seems superior to saquinavir boosted and indinavir boosted in terms of virologic efficacy and resistance mutations selection. A conclusion regarding boosted atazanavir and boosted fos-amprenavir versus lopinavir cannot be absolutely drawn on the basis of present results.

Topics: Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Ritonavir

As tolerance not only depends on protease inhibitors (PI) dosing but also on their trough concentrations, the enhanced exposure associated with PI boosting goes together with a reduced tolerance, especially at the biological level. Moreover, the toxicity associated with the low doses ritonavir used in boosting seems to compromise, at least partly, the favourable metabolic profile of certain PI. Eventually, boosted lopinavir tolerance is similar to that of other PI. Even if the advantage/risk ratio of lopinavir or other boosted PI globally seems favourable, the final choice belongs to the physician in charge of evaluating the individual risk of a lesser, especially metabolic tolerance, for his or her patient.

Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Ritonavir

Having changed the landscape in the treatment of HIV infection, the functional efficacy of current protease inhibitors (PIs) remains limited by their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. Complex metabolism by the cytochrome P450 system (particularly the 3A4 isoenzyme), action of membrane drug transporter elements (such as P-glycoprotein and multi-drug resistance-associated proteins) and activation of the nuclear receptor steroid xenobiotic receptor may alter exposures and compromise the antiretroviral activity of these drugs. These factors, as well as inadequate adherence, can facilitate the emergence of PI resistance and lead to regimen failure. Coadministration of ritonavir can enhance exposures of a primary PI by inhibiting CYP3A4 metabolism, P-glycoprotein activity and multi-drug resistance protein-1-mediated efflux. Adding ritonavir, however, is not without cost. Dyslipidaemia (possibly increasing the risk of cardiovascular events), gastrointestinal intolerance, multiple drug-to-drug interactions and activation of steroid xenobiotic receptor can all result and must be balanced against the pharmacokinetic improvement rendered by the addition of ritonavir. Understanding the pharmacological origins for the variations in exposures of PIs, both between and within patients, is important for the successful use of these agents.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Membrane Transport Proteins; Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear; Ritonavir

Lopinavir is a novel protease inhibitor (PI) developed from ritonavir. Coadministration with low-dose ritonavir significantly improves the pharmacokinetic properties and hence the activity of lopinavir against HIV-1 protease. Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir was developed for ease of administration and to ensure both drugs are taken together, as part of combination therapy with other antiretroviral agents. Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens provide adequate and durable suppression of viral load and sustained improvements in CD4+ cell counts, as demonstrated in randomised trials in antiretroviral therapy-naive and -experienced adults and children. To date, development of primary resistance to lopinavir/ritonavir has not been observed in 470 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients treated for >48 weeks. The lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen was more effective than nelfinavir in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-1-infected patients in a phase III trial. The coformulation is also effective as 'salvage' therapy, as shown by low cross-resistance rates in patients who failed to respond to treatment with other PIs in phase II trials. Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir was well tolerated in both antiretroviral therapy-naive and -experienced HIV-1-infected adults and children with low rates of study drug-related treatment discontinuations. The most common adverse event in adults associated with lopinavir/ritonavir was diarrhoea, followed by other gastrointestinal disturbances, asthenia, headache and skin rash. The incidence of moderate-to-severe adverse events in children was low, skin rash being the most common. Changes in body fat composition occurred with equal frequency in lopinavir/ritonavir- and nelfinavir-treated naive patients, through week 60 in a phase III study. Although laboratory abnormalities occurred with similar frequency in both treatment groups, triglycerides grade 3/4 elevations were significantly more frequent with lopinavir/ritonavir. Total cholesterol and triglycerides grade 3/4 elevations appear to occur more frequently in PI-experienced than in PI-naive lopinavir/ritonavir-treated patients. A number of clinically important drug interactions have been reported with lopinavir/ritonavir necessitating dosage adjustments of lopinavir/ritonavir and/or the interacting drugs, and several other drugs are contraindicated in patients receiving the coformulation.. Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir is a novel PI that, in combination with other antiretroviral agents, suppresses plasma viral load and enhances immunological status in therapy-naive and -experienced patients with HIV-1 infection. Lopinavir/ritonavir appears more effective than nelfinavir in 'naive' patients and is also suitable for 'salvage' therapy, because of its high barrier to development of resistance. Given its clinical efficacy, a tolerability profile in keeping with this class of drugs, favourable resistance profile and easy-to-adhere-to administration regimen, coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir should be regarded as a first-line option when including a PI in the management of HIV-1 infection.. Lopinavir/ritonavir is a coformulation of two structurally related protease inhibitor (PI) antiretroviral agents. Lopinavir is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of the HIV type 1 (HIV-1) protease, an essential enzyme for production of mature, infective virus. It acts by arresting maturation of HIV-1 thereby blocking its infectivity. Thus, the main antiviral action of lopinavir is to prevent subsequent infections of susceptible cells; it has no effect on cells with already integrated viral DNA. Lopinavir has an approximate, equals 10-fold higher in vitro activity against both wild-type and mutant HIV-1 proteases than ritonavir; however, its in vivo activity is greatly attenuated by a high first-pass hepatic metabolism. The low-dose ritonavir coadministered with lopinavir inhibits metabolic inactivation of lopinavir and acts only as its pharmacokinetic enhancer. Therefore, the antiretroviral activity of roviral activity of coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg twice daily is derived solely from lopinavir plasma concentrations. Combining lopinavir with low-dose ritonavir produces lopinavir concentrations far exceeding those needed to suppress 50% of in vitro and in vivo viral replication in CD4+ cells and monocyte/macrophages (main human reservoirs of HIV-1 infection). Thus far, no resistance to lopinavir has been detected in clinical trials in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients treated for up to 204 weeks and only 12% of HIV-1 strains from patients in whom prior treatment with multiple PIs have failed, have been observed to develop resistance to coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir. A strong negative correlation was found between the number of PI mutations at baseline and the viral response rates achieved with lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens in PI-experienced patients, indicating that resistance to lopinavir increases with increasing number of PI mutations and that five PI mutations represent the clinically relevant genotypic breakpoint for lopinavir.. The absolute bioavailability of lopinavir coformulated with ritonavir in humans has not yet been established. Multiple-dosage absorption pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg twice daily (the mean peak [C(max)] and trough [C(trough)] plasma concentrations at steady-state and the 12-hour area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC(12)] of either drug) were stable in antiretroviral therapy-naive and single PI-experienced adult patients receiving therapy over a 24-week evaluation period. The C(trough) values of lopinavir, achieved with lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg twice daily, were median 84-fold higher than the protein binding-adjusted 50% effective concentration (EC(50)) of lopinavir against wild-type HIV-1 in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-1-infected patients in a phase II study. Bioavailability of lopinavir administered in either the capsule or the liquid lopinavir/ritonavir formulation can be increased substantially with concurrent ingestion of food with moderate-to-high fat content. At steady state, lopinavir is approximately 98-99% plasma protein bound and the percentage of its unbound (i.e. pharmacologically active) fraction is dependent on total drug plasma concentration. Both lopinavir and ritonavir penetrate poorly into the human genital tracts and the cerebrospinal fluid. Both agents undergo extensive and rapid first-pass metabolism by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 isoenzyme. However, ritonavir also potently inhibits this enzyme and acts as a pharmacokinetic enhancer of lopinavir. The elimination half-life and apparent oral clearance of lopinavir average approximately 4-6 hours and approximately 6-7 L/h, respectively, with lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg twice daily administration. Less than 3% and 20% of the lopinavir dose is excreted unchanged in the urine and faeces, respectively. Limited data show similar pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in children as in adults.. Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir has the potential to interact with wide variety of drugs via several mechanisms, mostly involving the CYP enzymes. Coadministration of lopinavir/ritonavir is contraindicated with certain drugs (i.e. flecainide, propafenone, astemizole, terfenadine, ergot derivatives, cisapride, pimozide, midazolam and triazolam) that are highly dependent on CYP3A or CYP2D6 for clearance and for which elevated plasma concentrations are associated with serious and/or life-threatening events. Coadministration with lopinavir/ritonavir is also not recommended for drugs or herbal products (i.e. rifampicin [rifampin] and St. John's wort [Hypericum perforatum]) that may substantially reduce lopinavir plasma concentrations, or drugs whose plasma concentrations elevated by the coformulation may lead to serious adverse reactions (i.e. simvastatin and lovastatin). However, a recent study in healthy volunteers suggests that adequate lopinavir concentrations may be achieved during rifampicin coadministration by increasing the twice-daily dosage of lopinavir/ritonavir in conjunction with therapeutic drug monitoring. The liquid (but not the capsule) formulation of lopinavir/ritonavir contains 42.4% ethanol (v/v) and should not be coadministered with drugs capable of producing disulfiram-like reactions (e.g. disulfiram, metronidazole). Coadministration with saquinavir or indinavir requires no dosage adjustment, whereas coadministration with amprenavir, nevirapine or efavirenz requires a dosage increase of the coformulation typically by 33%. As the oral bioavailability of both didanosine and lopinavir/ritonavir is significantly affected by concurrent food ingestion, didanosine should be administered 1 hour before or 2 hours after lopinavir/ritonavir has been taken with food. Interactions between lopinavir/ritonavir and other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are not expected. The coformulation is also likely to increase plasma concentrations of non-antiretroviral drugs metabolised through the CYP3A pathway. To reduce the risk of their toxicity when coadministered with lopinavir/ritonavir, the recommended actions include: (i) monitoring of the drug plasma concentration (antiarrhythmics and immunosuppressants) or the international normalised ratio (warfarin); (ii) the use of alternative treatment (atorvastatin) or birth control methods (ethinylestradiol); and (iii) dosage adjustment (clarithromycin [only in patients with renal failure], rifa

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Ritonavir

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Androstadienes; Antiviral Agents; Asthma; Biological Availability; Cushing Syndrome; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

The pharmacokinetics of protease inhibitors center around the microsomal enzyme cytochrome P-450 3A4. As a potent inhibitor of this enzyme, ritonavir can increase the bioavailability and half-life of coadministered protease inhibitors. Evidence suggests that increased exposure to protease inhibitors is clinically relevant. Antiretroviral treatment with low-dose ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, indinavir, and saquinavir has durable virological activity and shows impressive immune reconstitution. Although tolerable in most cases, gastrointestinal side effects, hepatotoxicity, and blood lipid abnormalities remain relevant issues. Additional study will elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of twice-daily, low-dose ritonavir-boosted regimens and determine whether once-daily regimens based on this principle will have a lasting role in clinical practice.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Drug-resistant HIV-1 is a cause of growing clinical and public-health concern. In many patients, combination antiretroviral therapy fails to achieve complete viral suppression (virological failure). Continuing viral replication during therapy leads to the accumulation of drug-resistance mutations, resulting in increased viral load and a greater risk of disease progression. Patients with drug-resistant HIV-1 infection have three therapeutic options: a change to a salvage regimen with the aim of fully suppressing viral replication; interruption of therapy; or continuation of a partially effective regimen. The first strategy is preferred for most patients failing their first or perhaps their second regimen. However, the best approach remains unclear for patients who have failed multiple treatment regimens and who have limited options for complete viral suppression. The management of such patients requires a careful understanding of the pathogenesis of drug-resistant HIV-1, the clinical consequences of virological failure, the potential benefits and limitations of diagnostic assays, and the likelihood that agents in development will be effective.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Virus Replication

Although the reduction in HIV-1-related deaths with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is similar in adults and children, the extent of the changes in two important surrogate markers HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4+ T cell counts, differs widely. In most paediatric studies virological response rates to HAART are inferior to those in adults. This review provides an overview of the paediatric clinical studies using HAART and seeks to improve the understanding of factors that may contribute to success or failure of HAART in children. An overview of all current articles on paediatric clinical trials using HAART is provided. 23 papers were available. HIV-1 RNA loads and CD4+ T cell counts were used as primary outcome measures. Virological response rates were highly variable, both among the different antiretroviral drugs but also among different studies using the same medication. Four studies in which dosages of the administrated protease inhibitor (PI) were adjusted after pharmacokinetic evaluation had superior virological response rates compared with those in which fixed dosages were used. Immunological response rates were more uniform than virological responses. In almost all studies increases of CD4+ T cell counts are reported independent of the extent of the virological response. Side-effects of HAART were generally mild, transient, and of gastrointestinal origin. Significant percentages of patients with serum lipid abnormalities were reported in three paediatric studies. However, signs of clinical lipodystrophy were not observed. The inferior virological response rates, which have been reported in HIV-1 infected children treated with HAART form a reflection of the challenges that are encountered in the treatment of these children. Difficulties with adherence and with the pharmacokinetics of PIs in children require an intensive, child-adjusted approach. A practical approach to therapy in institutions without tertiary care facilities may be induction therapy with a lopinavir containing regimen (lacking a need for therapeutic drug monitoring), to reduce high viral load levels followed by an easily tolerated maintenance regimen, for example containing abacavir or nevirapine.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Oxazines; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

To examine the use of low-dose ritonavir as a pharmacokinetic enhancer for HIV protease inhibitors.. Primary articles, review articles, and conference abstracts identified by MEDLINE search (1995-May 2001) and secondary sources.. Low-dose ritonavir (100-200 mg) is increasingly being combined with HIV protease inhibitors to improve their effectiveness and allow less frequent dosing. An evaluation of the clinical evidence supporting this practice was conducted.. Limited outcome data exist for low-dose ritonavir-based regimens in general. Although preliminary data appear promising, more clinical evidence is needed to determine the optimal dosing, long-term safety, and relative effectiveness of this approach. The role of these regimens in early therapy remains to be defined.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; MEDLINE; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) can suppress viral replication and prolong patient life substantially. However, HAART can fail for a number of reasons, including incomplete adherence, pharmacokinetic factors and the emergence of resistance. Because the number of possible antiretroviral combinations is limited, the use of existing treatment options must be optimized. Whether the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in routine clinical practice may help with this purpose remains a subject of debate. However, TDM has been introduced in some centres despite the lack of guidelines for optimal use of this test.. In October 2000, a panel of experts met in Perugia, Italy, to discuss the key issues surrounding the introduction of TDM into routine clinical practice. The purpose of the meeting was to achieve a consensus among panel members on the following issues: (i) validity of data suggesting the utility of TDM in HAART; (ii) patient categories and clinical settings in which TDM may be of most benefit; (iii) target levels of antiretroviral agents; (iv) influence of covariables on target levels of drugs; (v) blood sampling and dosage adjustment strategies; and (vi) future research steps needed to elucidate issues regarding the applicability of TDM in clinical practice.. This report, which has been updated to include data published or presented at conferences up to the end of August 2001, summarizes the data presented and issues discussed at the meeting. This article will guide the reader through the data and discussions that have allowed the panel to formulate a series of position statements regarding the current status and future applications of TDM in antiretroviral therapy. These statements have been formulated to provide suggestions for the design of future TDM clinical trials, as well as to provide useful points of reflection for centres in which TDM is already in use.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Forecasting; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir

Saquinavir is a peptidomimetic inhibitor of HIV protease. Initially marketed as Invirasetrade mark, the effectiveness of saquinavir was greatly hindered by its nearly complete first pass metabolism by cytochrome P450 3A4. A new formulation, Fortovasetrade mark, appears to yield some six times the drug exposure and has been demonstrated to yield virological and immunological results similar to those of other protease inhibitors (PIs) when used in conjunction with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (nRTIs). Emerging data suggest it is safe to use twice daily. Co-administration of either formulation of saquinavir with nelfinavir and especially ritonavir yields greatly increased blood levels, with corresponding superior magnitude and durability of viral suppression in first line therapy, albeit with increased adverse effects. The combination of ritonavir and saquinavir has also yielded the most promising results published for second line therapy, after virological breakthrough on previous PI-containing therapy. In addition, preliminary data suggests the possibility of once daily dosing of ritonavir and saquinavir, which would be expected to increase compliance and allow for direct observed therapy.

Topics: Biological Availability; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Nelfinavir; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Virus Replication

Topics: Carbamates; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Furans; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Mutation; Nelfinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides

To assess the correlation between antiretroviral treatment and dyslipidaemia in HIV-infected patients, and the role of bezafibrate as a lipid-lowering agent.. We retrospectively compared serum lipid levels of five groups of 40 patients, each of them treated with either saquinavir hard gel, indinavir, or ritonavir (associated with two nucleoside analogues), or dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) with or without a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), or not treated with antiretrovirals, randomly selected from nearly 1000 HIV-infected patients followed-up for >or= 12 months, while on the relevant therapy. Hypertriglyceridaemia was defined by triglyceride levels >or= 172 mg/dl, and hypercholesterolaemia by cholesterol levels >or= 200 mg/dl. All patients with triglyceridaemia > 300 mg/dl and cholesterolaemia > 220 mg/dl for at least 6 months, and unresponsive to a >or= 3-month diet, started bezafibrate (400 mg/day), and were prospectively followed-up at a

Topics: Bezafibrate; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hyperlipidemias; Hypertriglyceridemia; Hypolipidemic Agents; Indinavir; Lipids; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

The development of antiretrovirals has led to a revolution in the care of patients infected with HIV. What was once a uniformly fatal syndrome has become a more treatable, chronic, infectious disease. Central to this revolution have been the protease inhibitors, a class of drugs with potent antiretroviral activity. The first member of this class was approved for use in 1995 and there are now five protease inhibitors approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir. As a result of the magnitude of the HIV pandemic coupled with the clinically proven efficacy of protease inhibitors, there are currently hundreds of ongoing clinical trials with these agents. Trial designs include comparisons between the various licensed protease inhibitors, comparisons of protease inhibitors to other classes of potent antiretroviral drugs, investigations with new protease inhibitors, investigations of protease inhibitor-related toxicities and attempts at simplifying current dosing regimens.

Topics: Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Clinical Protocols; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Ritonavir; Viral Load

Topics: Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Nelfinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Semen; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

All the currently available protease inhibitors are metabolised by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. All are inhibitors of CYP3A4, ranging from weak inhibition for saquinavir to very potent inhibition for ritonavir. Thus, they are predicted to have numerous drug interactions, although few such interactions have actually been documented either in pharmacokinetic studies or in clinical reports. This article reviews the published literature with an emphasis on the magnitude of interactions and on practical recommendations for management. Many of the drugs commonly taken by patients with HIV have a strong potential to interact with the protease inhibitors. In particular, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are also metabolised by CYPand have been shown to interact with protease inhibitors. Delaviridine is an inhibitor of CYP3A4, but nevirapine and efavirenz are inducers of CYP3A4. The protease inhibitors also interact with each other, and these interactions are being explored for their potential therapeutic benefits. Other commonly used drugs are also known to affect protease inhibitor metabolism, including inhibitors such as clarithromycin and the azole antifungals and inducers such as the rifamycins. Drugs that are known to be significantly affected by the protease inhibitors include ethinylestradiol and terfenadine; many other drugs have lesser or potential interactions. Although little specific data is available on the drug interactions of protease inhibitors, this lack of data should not be interpreted as a lack of interaction. Retrospective chart reviews have demonstrated that potentially severe drug interactions are frequently overlooked. Much more clinical data is needed, but pharmacists and physicians must always be vigilant for drug interactions, both those that are already documented and those that are predictable from pharmacokinetic profiles, in patients receiving protease inhibitors.

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Protease inhibitors (PIs) effectively inhibit replication of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and reduce mortality and prolong survival in patients with HIV infection. Newer PIs saquinavir (soft gelatin capsule) and amprenavir, as well as other PIs, may be effective when administered twice/day. Adverse reactions may occur, as well as metabolic complications and interactions between PIs and other drugs, including other PIs. The strategy of combining PIs is based on specific pharmacologic interactions among the agents.

Topics: Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Indinavir; Lipodystrophy; Nelfinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Deaths related to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and the incidence of opportunistic infections have been drastically decreased in the industrialized world. These reductions are mainly due to recent advances in the management of HIV infection, including the availability of new therapies. Until November 1995, the antiretroviral drugs available and approved by the Food and Drug Administration for clinical use in the United States consisted of only four nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors: zidovudine, zalcitabine, didanosine, and stavudine. Since then, 2 new classes of agents and 10 new agents have been approved; thus, the number of available antiretroviral drugs has more than tripled. Additional drugs and newer classes of antiretrovirals are in various stages of development. Because of the availability of more drugs, the complexity of HIV treatment has increased. Selecting an appropriate antiretroviral therapeutic regimen involves addressing multiple interdependent issues, including patient adherence, pharmacokinetic properties of the drugs (including food effects and drug-drug interactions), drug resistance, and overlapping adverse effects.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Delavirdine; Didanosine; Dideoxynucleosides; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Oxazines; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Protease Inhibitors; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Sulfonamides; Zalcitabine; Zidovudine

(1) Recent consensus recommendations agree that first-line treatment of HIV infection should consist of a three-drug regimen combining a protease inhibitor and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Some recommendations specifically advise against using the current formulation of saquinavir, but none express a preference for one of the other three protease inhibitors currently marketed in France (indinavir, nelfinavir and ritonavir). (2) These HIV protease inhibitors have established efficacy on viral load and the CD4+ lymphocyte count. Saquinavir may have lower virological efficacy. (3) The clinical efficacy of three-drug regimens containing indinavir or saquinavir is well demonstrated in patients at an advanced stage of HIV disease. (4) The risk of viral resistance is not currently a factor in choosing a HIV protease inhibitors. (5) Several epidemiological studies have compared the risk of adverse effects on three-drug regimens including indinavir, ritonavir or saquinavir. In these studies saquinavir was the best-tolerated drug and ritonavir the worst-tolerated. (6) Ritonavir interacts with many drugs. The poor bioavailability of the current saquinavir formulation also leads to risk of interactions. (7) Treatment constraints differ from one protease inhibitor to another, and these must be taken into account case by case. (8) The daily cost of treatment is not currently an important factor in choosing among the various preparations. (9) Taking into account efficacy, adverse effects, interactions and treatment constraints, the combination of indinavir with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors currently seems to be the best choice for the largest number of patients. (10) If problems of compliance arise, nelfinavir can be an alternative to indinavir. (11) In patients at an advanced stage of HIV disease who comply well with their treatment, saquinavir can also be an alternative to indinavir.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, and dosage and administration of protease inhibitors are reviewed. Protease inhibitors are a novel class of drugs used for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Saquinavir, ritonavir, indinavir, and nelfinavir have been approved in the United States; several other agents are under development. Protease inhibitors selectively block HIV protease, an enzyme involved in the later stages of HIV replication. Various pharmacokinetic differences exist among these agents, including differences in bioavailability, protein binding, and drug interactions. The drugs undergo extensive hepatic metabolism; dosage adjustments should be considered for patients with hepatic dysfunction. Clinical trials have shown protease inhibitors to be effective in reducing HIV RNA levels and increasing CD4+ lymphocyte counts. When protease inhibitors are used in combination with other antiretroviral agents, an additional beneficial effect on these markers occurs. Adverse effects of saquinavir and nelfinavir include mild gastrointestinal disturbances such as diarrhea. Ritonavir is less well tolerated because of gastrointestinal disturbances and circumoral and peripheral paresthesia. Indinavir has been associated with nephrolithiasis and asymptomatic hyperbilirubinemia. The development of resistance to protease inhibitors may be related to suboptimal dosages, noncompliance, or partial compliance. Protease inhibitors are potent and highly selective agents that block a critical step in HIV replication. They are effective and relatively well tolerated, but they are expensive, have extensive drug interaction profiles, and require careful compliance with the prescribed regimen.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Contraindications; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Delavirdine; Didanosine; Dideoxynucleosides; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Oxazines; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Zalcitabine; Zidovudine

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Retinopathy; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Retina; Retinal Diseases; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

In the treatment of infections caused by rapidly mutating viruses like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), combination therapy with multiple drugs acting by different mechanisms offers several advantages over monotherapy. It may provide: synergistic effect, possible reduction of dosages and side-effects, and reduction of the chance of drug resistance. In the past few years, hundreds of HIV protease inhibitors have been synthesized and tested in order to overcome the limitations of reverse transcriptase inhibitors like zidovudine and others. In this review, emphasis is placed on the development of HIV protease inhibitors as antiviral agents against HIV, and structure-activity relationship analysis of saquinavir and related compounds. Limitations of some protease inhibitors and ways to overcome the shortcomings are presented. Among these many protease inhibitors four have been marketed during 1995-1997. They are saquinavir, ritonavir, indinavir and nelfinavir. Their different structural features, important physicochemical, pharmacokinetic and clinical profiles are presented in a table form for easy comparison. It is hoped that in the future new drugs based on additional mechanisms can be developed for the treatment of AIDS.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-2; Humans; Indinavir; Nelfinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Structure-Activity Relationship

The clinical care of people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been substantially affected by the introduction of HIV-specific protease inhibitors (PIs). The 4 PIs available are saquinavir mesylate, ritonavir, indinavir sulfate, and nelfinavir mesylate. Comparison studies have not been reported; therefore, an assessment of the available data to aid clinicians and patients in choosing appropriate treatment will be presented.. A systematic review of peer-reviewed publications, abstracts from national and international conferences, and product registration information through September 1996.. Criteria used to select studies include their relevance to PIs, having been published in the English language, and pertinence for clinicians. Data quality and validity included the venue of the publication and relevance to clinical care.. Oral adminstration of ritonavir, indinavir, or nelfinavir generates sustainable drug serum levels to effectively inhibit the protease enzyme; however, saquinavir may not generate sustained levels necessary to inhibit the protease enzyme. Patients treated with ritonavir, indinavir, or nelfinavir experience similar reductions in viral load and increases in CD4+ lymphocytes; smaller effects occur among those treated with saquinavir. Two randomized placebo-controlled studies conducted among patients with severe immune system suppression and substantial zidovudine treatment experience demonstrated reduced HIV disease progression and reduced mortality with PI treatment. Genotypic resistance to PIs occurs; the clinical relevance of resistance is unclear. The costs of these agents including required monitoring impose new and substantial costs.. The PIs have emerged as critical drugs for people with HIV infection. Optimal use involves combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Resistance develops to each agent, and cross-resistance is likely. These agents must be used at full doses with attention to ensuring patient compliance. The expense of these agents may be offset by forestalling disease progression and death and returning people to productive life. Selecting the initial PI must be individualized, and factors to consider include proven activity, possible toxicities, dosing regimens, drug interactions, and costs.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Isoquinolines; Nelfinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Viral Load

Reproductive-age women constitute an increasing percentage of individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus. As clinical management issues particular to pregnancy become increasingly common, they are also becoming increasingly complex. With the approval of new antiretroviral agents, monotherapy with zidovudine, although still standard for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, has become inadequate therapy for treatment of the mother. Clinicians must now consider alternative therapeutic strategies in spite of a dearth of experience in the setting of pregnancy. To facilitate optimal drug treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-infected pregnant women while maintaining a focus on prevention of transmission, we reviewed Medline, Reprotox, personal files, and pharmaceutical industry information about the antiretroviral agents currently approved. After summarizing potential beneficial and detrimental effects in both the pregnant and nonpregnant individual, we suggest clinical strategies and discuss the ethical and legal principles that should guide therapeutic decisions in pregnancy.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Didanosine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Zalcitabine; Zidovudine

AIDS and HIV infection have stimulated an unprecedented amount of research. In this review we have selected a few publications illustrating key issues. Viral load monitoring is useful because short-term changes in viremia, caused by antiretroviral treatment, predict long-term outcome. Combination therapy with AZT plus either ddl or ddC produces better results than therapy with AZT only, but the differences are slight and appeared only after several years of follow-up. In contrast, the effect of adding 3TC to AZT-containing regimens was statistically significant after only one year, halving mortality and the incidence of new AIDS-defining opportunistic infection. Adding ritonavir had a similar effect after 20 week's follow-up in far-advanced HIV infection. The most potent regimens combine AZT, 3TC, and either ritonavir or indinavir; in the majority of patients thus treated viremia became undetectable (< 500 copies/ml).

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Didanosine; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Nevirapine; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Viral Load; Zalcitabine; Zidovudine

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Over the last few years, several new antiviral agents have been added to the chemotherapeutic armamentarium. This review discusses advances in the treatment of HIV disease in children and adults. More pronounced antiviral effects have been achieved through the study of new agents such as the protease inhibitors as well as through a better understanding of previously approved drugs, such as reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Child; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Nevirapine; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Stavudine

Seldom in the history of medicine has an entire generation of patients with an incurable, progressive, and ultimately fatal disease suddenly been offered the prospect of extended survival and even, perhaps, a "second life." The relatively simultaneous appearance of 2 major treatment developments has created profound changes in therapeutic options and outlook. The first development is an assay of serum levels of human immunodeficiency virus viral copies, providing a critical tool for clinical decision making. The second is the marketing between December 1995 and April 1997 of 4 human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors that, combined with previously available antiviral medications, achieve a new level of efficacy. With the advent of these changes come multiple psychiatric research and policy issues. These include the development of strategies to establish and maintain medication adherence. This is a critical task, given the complexity of combination therapy regimens and the rapid onset of viral resistance to protease inhibitors within days to weeks of missed or suboptimal dosing. The psychological issues to be studied include the process of restructuring lives and expectations in the event of clinical benefit or managing the distress associated with clinical failure. Other research questions include the effects of restored health on the appraisal of human immunodeficiency virus risk behaviors, assessment of effect of neurocognitive functioning, and unanswered questions about psychotropic or protease inhibitor drug interactions due to their shared metabolic pathways. Behavioral scientists can inform provision of care to patients who may be considered difficult to treat, such as those with severe and persistent mental illness or active substance abuse or the homeless. This includes the provision of empirical data regarding individual and situational characteristics that are likely to promote or impede adherence, as well as innovative provision systems. Psychiatry can make notable contributions during this turning point in human immunodeficiency virus therapeutics and research.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Attitude to Health; Drug Approval; Drug Costs; Drug Interactions; Health Policy; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Life Style; Nelfinavir; Primary Prevention; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Viral Load

Anti-retroviral treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is undergoing great changes, brought about by a better understanding of the disease pathology. One of the most recent advances has been the introduction of the protease inhibitors, reversible inhibitors of HIV aspartic protease. Published data on the clinical efficacy of these drugs are limited, but preliminary results suggest that, in combination with one or more nucleoside analogues, they represent an important advance in the treatment of patients with advanced HIV infection. The adverse effects and potential for drug interactions, together with the additional cost associated with prescribing these drugs, mean that careful selection and supervision of these patients is imperative.. To present an up-to-date review of the three most recently introduced protease inhibitors.. Based on a review of the literature, abstracts from relevant meetings and information from the pharmaceutical companies.. A review including background data on HIV infection and the treatment options. Detailed information on ritonavir, saquinavir and indinavir.. These new drugs are useful additions to the therapeutic current aims for the treatment of HIV infection. They need to be used under close supervision by specialists.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Forecasting; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Didanosine; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Zalcitabine; Zidovudine

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Didanosine; Health Personnel; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Occupational Exposure; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Zalcitabine; Zidovudine

Topics: Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases; Drug Resistance, Microbial; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Ritonavir is a protease inhibitor with an HIV-1 resistance profile similar to that of indinavir, but different from that of saquinavir. Ritonavir has good oral bioavailability, and may increase the bioavailability of other protease inhibitors including saquinavir, nelfinavir, indinavir and VX-478. Clinically significant drug interactions have been predicted between ritonavir and a range of medications. In patients with HIV-1 infection, ritonavir markedly reduced viral load within 2 weeks of treatment onset and also increased CD4+ cell counts. In a large placebo-controlled trial in patients with advanced HIV infection, the addition of ritonavir to existing therapy reduced the risk of mortality by 43% and clinical progression by 56% after 6.1 months. Triple therapy with ritonavir plus zidovudine, in combination with lamivudine or zalcitabine, reduced HIV viraemia to below detectable levels in most patients with acute, and some patients with advanced HIV infection in 2 small trials. Early results suggest combination therapy with ritonavir and saquinavir increases CD4+ cell counts and decreases HIV RNA levels in patients with previously untreated HIV infection.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-HIV Agents; Biological Availability; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Tolerance; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Leukocyte Count; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; RNA, Messenger; Zalcitabine; Zidovudine

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Nucleosides; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Microbial; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

SMILE, a multicentre randomized trial, compared the efficacy and safety of switching virologically suppressed children and adolescents with HIV to a once-daily dual regimen of dolutegravir plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir versus continuing standard ART. Within a nested pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy, we performed a population PK analysis to describe total and unbound dolutegravir plasma concentrations in children and adolescents receiving this dual therapy.. Sparse blood samples were obtained during follow-up for dolutegravir quantification. A population PK model was developed to simultaneously describe total and unbound dolutegravir concentrations. Simulations were performed and were compared with the protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration (IC90) and the in vitro IC50, respectively. Dolutegravir exposures in children aged ≥12 years were also compared with values in treatment-experienced adults.. Four hundred and fifty-five samples from 153 participants aged between 12 and 18 years were collected for this PK analysis. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described unbound dolutegravir concentrations. The relationship between unbound and total dolutegravir concentrations was best characterized by a non-linear model. Unbound dolutegravir apparent clearance was significantly influenced by total bilirubin concentrations and by Asian ethnicity. All children and adolescents had trough concentrations well above the protein-adjusted IC90 and the in vitro IC50 values. Dolutegravir concentrations and exposures were also similar to those obtained in adults receiving dolutegravir 50 mg once daily.. A once-daily 50 mg dolutegravir dose for children and adolescents produces adequate total and unbound concentrations when used as part of dual therapy with ritonavir-boosted darunavir.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Darunavir; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; Humans; Oxazines; Pyridones; Ritonavir

Because NRTIs can have fetal toxicities, we evaluated a perinatal NRTI-sparing strategy to prevent perinatal HIV transmission. Our primary objective was to determine the proportion maintaining a viral load (VL) of <50 copies/mL up to delivery on darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy, without requiring treatment intensification.. In a one-arm, multicentre Phase 2 clinical trial, eligible patients in the first trimester of pregnancy on ART with plasma VL < 50 copies/mL received maintenance monotherapy with darunavir/ritonavir, 600/100 mg twice daily. VL was monitored monthly. ART was intensified in the case of VL > 50 copies/mL. Neonates received nevirapine prophylaxis for 14 days.. Of 89 patients switching to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy, 4 miscarried before 22 weeks' gestation, 2 changed treatment for elevated liver enzymes without virological failure, and 83 were evaluable for the main outcome. Six had virological failure confirmed on a repeat sample (median VL = 193 copies/mL; range 78-644), including two before switching to monotherapy. In these six cases, ART was intensified with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine. The success rate was 75/83, 90.4% (95% CI, 81.9%-95.7%) considering two patients with VL missing at delivery as failures, and 77/83, 92.8% (95% CI, 84.9%-97.3%) when considering them as successes since both had undetectable VL on darunavir/ritonavir throughout pregnancy. In ITT, the last available VL before delivery was <50 copies/mL in all of the patients. There was no case of perinatal HIV transmission.. Darunavir/ritonavir maintenance monotherapy required intensification in nearly 10% of cases. This limits its widespread use, thus other regimens should be evaluated in order to limit exposure to antiretrovirals, particularly NRTIs, during pregnancy.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) and tenofovir in a subset of African children enrolled in the CHAPAS-4 trial.. Children aged 3-15 years with human immunodeficiency virus infection failing first-line antiretroviral therapy were randomized to emtricitabine/TAF versus standard-of-care nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor combination, plus dolutegravir, atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir, or lopinavir/ritonavir. Daily emtricitabine/TAF was dosed according to World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended weight bands: 120/15 mg in children weighing 14 to <25 kg and 200/25 mg in those weighing ≥25 kg. At steady state, 8-9 blood samples were taken to construct pharmacokinetic curves. Geometric mean (GM) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) were calculated for TAF and tenofovir and compared to reference exposures in adults.. Pharmacokinetic results from 104 children taking TAF were analyzed. GM (coefficient of variation [CV%]) TAF AUClast when combined with dolutegravir (n = 18), darunavir/ritonavir (n = 34), or lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 20) were 284.5 (79), 232.0 (61), and 210.2 (98) ng*hour/mL, respectively, and were comparable to adult reference values. When combined with atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 32), TAF AUClast increased to 511.4 (68) ng*hour/mL. For each combination, tenofovir GM (CV%) AUCtau and Cmax remained below reference values in adults taking 25 mg TAF with a boosted protease inhibitors.. In children, TAF combined with boosted PIs or dolutegravir and dosed according to WHO-recommended weight bands provides TAF and tenofovir concentrations previously demonstrated to be well tolerated and effective in adults. These data provide the first evidence for use of these combinations in African children.. ISRCTN22964075.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiviral Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Child; Darunavir; Emtricitabine; Fumarates; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Protease Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

Data to inform the switch from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) to dolutegravir in patients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who do not have genotype information and who have viral suppression with second-line therapy containing a ritonavir-boosted PI have been limited.. In a prospective, multicenter, open-label trial conducted at four sites in Kenya, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, previously treated patients without genotype information who had viral suppression while receiving treatment containing a ritonavir-boosted PI to either switch to dolutegravir or continue the current regimen. The primary end point was a plasma HIV type 1 RNA level of at least 50 copies per milliliter at week 48, assessed on the basis of the Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm. The noninferiority margin for the between-group difference in the percentage of participants who met the primary end point was 4 percentage points. Safety up to week 48 was assessed.. A total of 795 participants were enrolled, with 398 assigned to switch to dolutegravir and 397 assigned to continue taking their ritonavir-boosted PI; 791 participants (397 in the dolutegravir group and 394 in the ritonavir-boosted PI group) were included in the intention-to-treat exposed population. At week 48, a total of 20 participants (5.0%) in the dolutegravir group and 20 (5.1%) in the ritonavir-boosted PI group met the primary end point (difference, -0.04 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -3.1 to 3.0), a result that met the criterion for noninferiority. No mutations conferring resistance to dolutegravir or the ritonavir-boosted PI were detected at the time of treatment failure. The incidence of treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar in the dolutegravir group and the ritonavir-boosted PI group (5.7% and 6.9%, respectively).. In previously treated patients with viral suppression for whom there were no data regarding the presence of drug-resistance mutations, dolutegravir treatment was noninferior to a regimen containing a ritonavir-boosted PI when the patients were switched from a ritonavir-boosted PI-based regimen. (Funded by ViiV Healthcare; 2SD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04229290.).

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Kenya; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

HIV protease inhibitors anti-Plasmodium falciparum activity in adults remains uncertain.. Adults with HIV CD4+ counts >200 cells/mm3 starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) with P. falciparum subclinical parasitemia (Pf SCP) were randomized 1:1 to (step 1) protease inhibitor lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based (arm A) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nNRTI)-based ART (arm B) for 15 days. In step 2, participants received nNRTI-based ART and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis for 15 days. P. falciparum SCP clearance was measured by polymerase chain reaction. The Fisher exact test [95% exact confidence interval (CI)] was used to compare proportions of P. falciparum SCP clearance (<10 parasites/μL on 3 occasions within 24 hours) between LPV/r and nNRTI arms at day 15. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare time-to-clearance.. Fifty-two adults from Kenya, Malawi, and Uganda with a median age = 31 (Q1, Q3: 24-39) years, 33% women, with baseline median CD4+ counts of 324 (259-404) cells/mm3, median HIV-1 RNA viremia of 5.18 log10 copies/mL (4.60-5.71), and median estimated P. falciparum density of 454 parasites/μL (83-2219) enrolled in the study. Forty-nine (94%) participants completed the study. At day 15, there was no statistically significant difference in the proportions of P. falciparum SCP clearance between the LPV/r (23.1% clearance; 6 of the 26) and nNRTI (26.9% clearance; 7 of the 26) arms [between-arm difference 3.9% (95% CI, -21.1% to 28.4%; P = 1.00)]. No significant difference in time-to-clearance was observed between the arms (P = 0.80).. In a small randomized study of adults starting ART with P. falciparum SCP, no statistically significant differences were seen between LPV/r- and nNRTI-based ART in P. falciparum SCP clearance after 15 days of treatment.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Parasitemia; Plasmodium falciparum; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir

Antiretroviral options for neonates (younger than 28 days) should be expanded. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and acceptability of the "4-in-1" fixed-dose pediatric granule formulation of abacavir/lamivudine/lopinavir/ritonavir (30/15/40/10 mg) in neonates.. The PETITE study is an ongoing phase I/II, open-label, single-arm, 2-stage trial conducted in South Africa. In stage 1, term neonates exposed to HIV on standard antiretroviral prophylaxis (nevirapine ± zidovudine) received single dose(s) of the 4-in-1 formulation, followed by intensive pharmacokinetic sampling and safety assessments. At each PK visit, blood was drawn after an observed dose at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours postdose. In this study, we have reported the planned interim pharmacokinetic and safety analysis after completion of the single-dose administration.. Sixteen neonates, with a median (range) birth weight of 3130 g (2790-3590 g), completed 24 pharmacokinetic visits. The 4-in-1 formulation imposed relatively high doses of abacavir [8.6 mg/kg (6.6-11.4)] and lamivudine [4.3 mg/kg (3.3-5.7)] but lower doses of lopinavir [11.5 mg/kg (8.8-15.2)]. The geometric means (GM, 90% CI) AUC0-12 of abacavir, lamivudine, and lopinavir were 29.87 (26.29-33.93), 12.61 (10.72-14.83), and 3.49 (2.13-5.72) µg.h/mL, respectively. Lopinavir GM AUC0-12 was below the predefined target (20-100 µg.h/mL), and ritonavir concentrations were only detectable in 4 of the 120 (3%) samples. No adverse events were related to study drugs. No neonate had difficulty swallowing the 4-in-1 formulation.. The high doses of abacavir and lamivudine (in mg/kg) and AUCs were safe, and the formulation was well tolerated; however, lopinavir/ritonavir exposures were extremely low, preventing its use in neonates use in neonates. Alternative pediatric solid antiretroviral formulations must be studied in neonates.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Ritonavir

Proof-of-concept studies demonstrated lonafarnib (LNF), a first-in-class oral prenylation inhibitor, efficacy in patients infected with HDV. The lonafarnib with ritonavir for HDV-2 (LOWR-2) study's aim was to identify optimal combination regimens of LNF + ritonavir (RTV) ± pegylated interferon alpha (PEG-IFNα) with efficacy and tolerability for longer-term dosing. Here we report the safety and efficacy at end of treatment for up to 24 weeks.. Fifty-five patients with chronic HDV were consecutively enrolled in an open-label, single-center, phase 2 dose-finding study. There were three main treatment groups: high-dose LNF (LNF ≥ 75 mg by mouth [po] twice daily [bid] + RTV) (n = 19, 12 weeks); all-oral low-dose LNF (LNF 25 or 50 mg po bid + RTV) (n = 24, 24 weeks), and combination low-dose LNF with PEG-IFNα (LNF 25 or 50 mg po bid + RTV + PEG-IFNα) (n = 12, 24 weeks). The primary endpoint, ≥2 log. LNF, boosted with low-dose RTV, is a promising all-oral therapy, and maximal efficacy is achieved with PEG-IFNα addition. The identified optimal regimens support a phase 3 study of LNF for the treatment of HDV.

Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis D, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Piperidines; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA

WHO guidelines recommend dolutegravir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for second-line HIV therapy, with NRTI switching from first-line tenofovir to zidovudine. We aimed to examine whether dolutegravir is non-inferior to darunavir, the best-in-class protease inhibitor drug, and whether maintaining tenofovir in second-line therapy is non-inferior to switching to zidovudine.. In this prospective, multicentre, open-label, factorial, randomised, non-inferiority trial (NADIA), participants with confirmed HIV first-line treatment failure (HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies per mL) were recruited at seven clinical sites in Kenya, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Following a 2 × 2 factorial design and stratified by site and screening HIV-1 RNA concentration, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive a 96-week regimen containing either dolutegravir (50 mg once daily) or ritonavir-boosted darunavir (800 mg of darunavir plus 100 mg of ritonavir once daily) in combination with either tenofovir (300 mg once daily) plus lamivudine (300 mg once daily) or zidovudine (300 mg twice daily) plus lamivudine (150 mg twice daily). The NRTI drugs allocated by randomisation were administered orally in fixed-dose combination pills; other drugs were administered orally as separate pills. The previously reported primary outcome was the proportion of participants with a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration of less than 400 copies per mL at 48 weeks. Here, we report the main secondary outcome: the proportion of participants with a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration of less than 400 copies per mL at 96 weeks (non-inferiority margin 12%). We analysed this outcome and safety outcomes in the intention-to-treat population, which excluded only those who were randomly assigned in error and withdrawn before receiving trial drugs. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03988452, and is complete.. Between July 30 and Dec 18, 2019, we screened 783 patients and enrolled 465. One participant was randomly assigned in error and immediately withdrawn. The remaining 464 participants were randomly assigned to receive either dolutegravir (n=235) or ritonavir-boosted darunavir (n=229) and to receive lamivudine plus either tenofovir (n=233) or zidovudine (n=231). At week 96, 211 (90%) of 235 participants in the dolutegravir group and 199 (87%) of 229 participants in the darunavir group had HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL (percentage point difference 2·9, 95% CI -3·0 to 8·7), indicating non-inferiority. Nine (4%) participants (all in the dolutegravir group) developed dolutegravir resistance; no participants developed darunavir resistance (p=0·0023). In the other randomised comparison, 214 (92%) of 233 patients in the tenofovir group and 196 (85%) of 231 patients in the zidovudine group had HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL (percentage point difference 7·0, 95% CI 1·2 to 12·8), showing non-inferiority and indicating the superiority of tenofovir (p=0·019). The proportions of participants with any grade 3-4 adverse event were similar between the dolutegravir (26 [11%]) and darunavir (28 [12%]) groups and between the tenofovir (22 [9%]) and zidovudine (32 [14%]) groups. There were no deaths related to study medication.. Dolutegravir-based and darunavir-based regimens maintain good viral suppression during 96 weeks; dolutegravir is non-inferior to darunavir but is at greater risk of resistance in second-line therapy. Tenofovir should be continued in second-line therapy, rather than being switched to zidovudine.. Janssen.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Oxazines; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Ritonavir; RNA; Tenofovir; Viral Load; Zidovudine

Hypertension (HTN) is a common comorbidity among people with HIV and associated with an increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. The relationship of antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation to incident HTN remains a clinical question. We determined HTN incidence at 48 weeks of follow-up among ART-naive participants without HTN and not taking antihypertensive medications at ART initiation through randomized clinical trials through the AIDS Clinical Trial Group between 1999 and 2011. We assessed the association of baseline characteristics, including randomized ART agents with HTN incidence at 48 weeks using Poisson regression models. Incident HTN was defined as blood pressure ≥130/80 mmHg, or use of antihypertensive medication. Among 2,614 participants, mean age was 37 ± 10 years, 79% male sex, and 36% African American race. After 48 weeks, 839 participants (32%) developed HTN. Receiving a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) was associated with an increased relative risk (RR) of incident HTN, while the risk was lower for protease inhibitor use. Stavudine and efavirenz were associated with an increased RR of developing HTN, while tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, darunavir/ritonavir, and atazanavir/ritonavir were associated with a decreased risk of developing HTN. Additionally, older age, higher body mass index (BMI), and having hepatitis C were associated with an increased risk for developing HTN, while women and participants with a higher baseline CD4 count were at a decreased risk of developing HTN at 48 weeks. One third of these ART naive participants developed HTN after ART initiation. NNRTIs, notably efavirenz, and stavudine were associated with an increased risk of HTN. Additional factors associated with HTN included traditional factors like older age and higher BMI, and advanced HIV disease (lower CD4 count). (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00001137).

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antihypertensive Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Stavudine

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; Humans; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Quality of Life; Ritonavir; Viral Load

Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of antiretroviral therapy. The phase IV study, IMPAACT P1092, compared PK, safety, and tolerability of zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in children with and without SAM.. Children living with HIV 6 to <36 months of age with or without World Health Organization (WHO)-defined SAM received ZDV, 3TC, and LPV/r syrup for 48 weeks according to WHO weight band dosing. Intensive PK sampling was performed at weeks 1, 12, and 24. Plasma drug concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Steady-state mean area under the curve (AUC0-12h) and clearance (CL/F) for each drug were compared. Grade ≥3 adverse events were compared between cohorts.. Fifty-two children were enrolled across 5 sites in Africa with 44% (23/52) female, median age 19 months (Q1, Q3: 13, 25). Twenty-five children had SAM with entry median weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) -3.4 (IQR -4.0, -3.0) and 27 non-SAM had median WHZ -1.0 (IQR -1.8, -0.1). No significant differences in mean AUC0-12h or CL/F were observed (P ≥ 0.09) except for lower 3TC AUC0-12h (GMR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.4-1.0; P = 0.047) at week 12, higher ZDV AUC0-12h (GMR, 1.52; 1.2-2.0; P = 0.003) at week 24 in the SAM cohort compared with non-SAM cohort. Treatment-related grade ≥3 events did not differ significantly between cohorts (24.0% vs. 25.9%).. PK and safety findings for ZDV, 3TC, and LPV/r support current WHO weight band dosing of syrup formulations in children with SAM.

Topics: Africa South of the Sahara; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Child, Preschool; Chromatography, Liquid; Cohort Studies; Drug Combinations; Drug Elimination Routes; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Patient Safety; Ritonavir; Severe Acute Malnutrition; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Zidovudine

In the ANRS 12174 trial, HIV-exposed uninfected African neonates who received lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) prophylaxis for 1 year exhibited slower growth from birth to week 50 compared with those receiving lamivudine (3TC). We assessed whether this difference in growth persisted over time, and was accompanied by differences in neuropsychological and clinical outcomes. Between February 2017 and February 2018, we conducted a cross-sectional clinical evaluation among former trial participants who completed the 50-week follow-up and who were not HIV-infected. In addition to clinical examination, neuropsychological outcomes were assessed using the tests Kaufman-ABCII, Test of Variables of Attention, Movement Assessment Battery for Children and the Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire, parent version. Of 1101 eligible children, aged 5-7 years, 553 could be traced and analysed (274 in the LPV/r and 279 in the 3TC groups). Growth, clinical and neuropsychological outcomes did not differ between treatment groups. At school age, children exposed to LPV/r and 3TC at birth for 1 year had comparable growth and neuropsychological outcomes without evidence of long-term side-effects of LPV/r. It provides reassuring data on clinical outcomes for all HIV-infected children treated with this antiretroviral drug in early life.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Burkina Faso; Chemoprevention; Child; Child Development; Child, Preschool; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Ritonavir; South Africa; Surveys and Questionnaires; Uganda; Zambia

We set out to evaluate the effect of postnatal exposure to tenofovir-containing antiretroviral therapy on bone mineral density among breastfeeding women living with HIV.. IMPAACT P1084s is a sub-study of the PROMISE randomized trial conducted in four African countries (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01066858).. IMPAACT P1084s enrolled eligible mother-infant pairs previously randomised in the PROMISE trial at one week after delivery to receive either maternal antiretroviral therapy (Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate / Emtricitabine + Lopinavir/ritonavir-maternal TDF-ART) or administer infant nevirapine, with no maternal antiretroviral therapy, to prevent breastmilk HIV transmission. Maternal lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density were measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at postpartum weeks 1 and 74. We studied the effect of the postpartum randomization on percent change in maternal bone mineral density in an intention-to-treat analysis with a t-test; mean and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) are presented.. Among 398/400 women included in this analysis, baseline age, body-mass index, CD4 count, mean bone mineral density and alcohol use were comparable between study arms. On average, maternal lumbar spine bone mineral density declined significantly through week 74 in the maternal TDF-ART compared to the infant nevirapine arm; mean difference (95%CI) -2.86 (-4.03, -1.70) percentage points (p-value <0.001). Similarly, maternal hip bone mineral density declined significantly more through week 74 in the maternal TDF-ART compared to the infant nevirapine arm; mean difference -2.29% (-3.20, -1.39) (p-value <0.001). Adjusting for covariates did not change the treatment effect.. Bone mineral density decline through week 74 postpartum was greater among breastfeeding HIV-infected women randomized to receive maternal TDF-ART during breastfeeding compared to those mothers whose infants received nevirapine prophylaxis.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Bone Density; Breast Feeding; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Postpartum Period; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Young Adult

Drug potency is a pharmacological parameter defining dose or concentration of drug required to obtain 50% of the drug's maximal effect. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling and simulation allows estimation of potency and evaluate strategies improving treatment outcome. The objective of our study is to determine potency of atazanavir in hair, defined as atazanavir level in hair associated with 50% probability of failing to achieve viral load below 1000 copies/ml among adolescents, and explore the effect of participant specific variables on potency.. A secondary analysis was performed on data from a previous study conducted in HIV-infected adolescents failing 2nd line ART from Harare central hospital, Zimbabwe, between 2015 and 2016. We simulated atazanavir concentrations in hair using NONMEM (version 7.3) ADVAN 13, based on a previously established pharmacokinetic model. Logistic regression methods were used for PKPD analysis. Simulations utilising PKPD model focused on estimation of potency and exploring the effect of covariates.. The potency of atazanavir in hair was found to be 4.5 ng/mg hair before adjusting for covariate effects. Participants at three months follow-up, reporting adequate adherence, having normal BMI-for-age, and cared for by mature guardians had increased potency of atazanavir in hair of 2.6 ng/mg, however the follow-up event was the only statistically significant factor at 5% level.. Atazanavir in hair in the range 2.6 to 4.5 ng/mg is associated with above 50% probability of early viral load suppression. Adherence monitoring to adolescents with lower potency of atazanavir is recommended. The effect self-reported adherence level, BMI-for-age, and caregiver status require further evaluation.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Caregivers; Female; Hair; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Medication Adherence; Models, Biological; Overweight; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Thinness; Viral Load; Zimbabwe

Changes in tryptophan metabolism affect human physiology including the immune system, mood, and sleep and are associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pathogenesis. This study investigates whether the treatment of HIV-infected individuals with the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, aprepitant, alters tryptophan metabolism.This study utilized archival samples from 3 phase 1B clinical trials "Anti-HIV Neuroimmunomodulatory Therapy with Neurokinin-1 Antagonist Aprepitant"-2 double-blinded, placebo-controlled, and 1 open-label study. We tested samples from a total of 57 individuals: 26 combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) naïve individuals receiving aprepitant, 19 cART naïve individuals receiving placebo, and 12 individuals on a ritonavir-containing cART regimen receiving aprepitant. We evaluated the effect of aprepitant on tryptophan metabolism by measuring levels of kynurenine and tryptophan in archival plasma samples and calculating the kynurenine to tryptophan ratio.Aprepitant treatment affected tryptophan metabolism in both cART treated and cART naïve individuals with more profound effects in patients receiving cART. While aprepitant treatment affected tryptophan metabolism in all HIV-infected patients, it only significantly decreased kynurenine to tryptophan ratio in cART treated individuals. Aprepitant treatment offers an opportunity to target inflammation and mood disorders frequently co-existing in chronic HIV infection.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Aprepitant; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Kynurenine; Male; Mood Disorders; Neuroimmunomodulation; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Tryptophan

Suboptimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is responsible for most virologic failure among adolescents with HIV. Methods for objectively measuring adherence to ART are limited. This study assessed the association between ritonavir concentrations in hair and self-reported adherence and modified directly administered ART on virologic outcomes among HIV-infected adolescents who were virologically failing second-line ART in Harare, Zimbabwe.. HIV-infected adolescents on atazanavir-based or ritonavir-based second-line treatment for >6 months with viral load ≥1000 copies/mL were randomized to either modified directly administered ART (mDAART) plus standard of care (intervention) or standard of care alone (control). Questionnaires were administered; viral load and hair samples were collected at baseline and after 90 days. Virological suppression was defned as <1000 copies/mL after follow-up.. Fifty adolescents (13-19 years) were enrolled in the study, and 42 adolescents had ritonavir concentrations measured in hair at baseline and at 90 days. Twenty-three participants (46%) were randomized to mDAART. Viral load suppression at follow-up [regression coefficient (standard error): -0.3 (0.1); 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.5 to -0.06; P = 0.01], self-reported adherence at follow-up [regression coefficient (standard error): 0.01 (0.005); 95% CI: 0.004 to 0.02; P = 0.006], and being male sex [regression coefficient (standard error): 0.3 (0.1); 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.5; P = 0.008] were associated with ritonavir concentrations in hair. The intervention, mDAART, was not associated with ritonavir concentrations [regression coefficient (standard error) 0.2 (0.1); 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.4; P = 0.2].. Ritonavir concentrations in hair predicted virological suppression and were associated with self-reported adherence and being male in this cohort of adolescents with treatment failure to atazanavir-based or ritonavir-based second-line ART. Measuring ritonavir concentrations in hair in adolescents on protease inhibitor-based regimens could assess adherence in this vulnerable group to avert subsequent virologic failure.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Female; Hair; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Ritonavir; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Zimbabwe

Switching from boosted PIs to dolutegravir in people living with HIV (PLWH) with high cardiovascular risk improved plasma lipids at 48 weeks in the NEAT022 trial. Whether this strategy may have an impact on cardiovascular biomarkers is unknown.. We assessed 48 week changes in biomarkers associated with inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, monocyte immune activation, oxidation, insulin resistance, hypercoagulability, heart failure, myocardial injury, and glomerular and tubular kidney injury.. Of 415 PLWH randomized in the NEAT022 study, 313 (75.4%) remained on allocated therapy and had paired samples available. Soluble CD14 (-11%, P < 0.001) and adiponectin (-11%, P < 0.001) significantly declined and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (-13%, P = 0.069) and oxidized LDL (-13%, P = 0.084) tended to decrease with dolutegravir. Switching to dolutegravir remained significantly associated with soluble CD14 and adiponectin reductions after adjustment for baseline variables. There were inverse correlations between soluble CD14 and CD4 count changes (P = 0.05), and between adiponectin and BMI changes (P < 0.001).. Switching from boosted PIs to dolutegravir in PLWH with high cardiovascular risk led to soluble CD14 and adiponectin reductions at 48 weeks. While decreasing soluble CD14 may entail favourable health effects in PLWH, adiponectin reduction may reflect less insulin sensitivity associated with weight gain.

Topics: Adiponectin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; Humans; Lipopolysaccharide Receptors; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Risk Factors; Ritonavir

A high prevalence of suboptimal serum vitamin D has been reported among HIV infected children even in countries with high sunshine abundance throughout the year. Vitamin D is a potent immune modulator of innate and adaptive immune responses. Vitamin D regulates immune responses through the vitamin D receptor on CD4 cells. We aimed to determine the vitamin D status of HIV infected children and factors associated with suboptimal vitamin D.. This was a cross sectional study. We enrolled children aged between 6 months and 12 years attending an outpatient paediatric HIV clinic. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) was measured using the electrochemoluminisence method. Suboptimal vitamin D was defined as 25(OH)D <30 ng/ml, vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency were 21-29 ng/ml and <20 ng/ml respectively. Anthropometry, physical exam and medical history were documented. Logistic regression was performed.. We enrolled 376 children with mean age (sd) 8.05 years (3.03), a median (IQR) duration of ART of 5.9 years (3.2-8.4). Majority of the children (64%) had been exposed to non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). A third were severely immunosuppressed (CD4% ≤15%) at ART initiation. At the time of the study, the majority (89%) were virologically suppressed (VL <1000 copies/ml). Prevalence of 25(OH)D <30 ng/ml was 49 (13%) of 375 participants and 11 (3%) had 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml. Lopinavir/ritonavir regimen was independently associated with 25(OH)D <30 ng/ml; OR 0.27 CI (0.13-0.57), p value-0.002. Serum 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml was associated with CD4 count ≤15% at ART initiation OR 6.55(1.30-32.9), p value-0.023 and use of NNRTIs; OR 10.9(1.22-96.2), p value-0.03.. We found a low prevalence of suboptimal vitamin D compared to earlier reports. Severe immunosuppression at ART initiation and use of NNRTIs increases odds of deficiency. Vitamin D supplementation should be considered in severely immunosuppressed children initiating ART.

Topics: Calcifediol; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Ritonavir; Uganda; Vitamin D Deficiency

Protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy may be used in resource-limited settings in persons with human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis (HIV-TB). Data on safety, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), and HIV-TB outcomes for lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) used with rifampin (RIF) or rifabutin (RBT) are limited.. We randomized adults with HIV-TB from July 2013 to February 2016 to arm A, LPV/r 400 mg/100 mg twice daily + RBT 150 mg/day; arm B, LPV/r 800 mg/200 mg twice daily + RIF 600 mg/day; or arm C, LPV/r 400 mg/100 mg twice daily + raltegravir (RAL) 400 mg twice daily + RBT 150 mg/day. All received two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and other TB drugs. PK visits occurred on day 12 ± 2. Within-arm HIV-TB outcomes were summarized using proportions and 95% CIs; PK were compared using Wilcoxon tests.. Among 71 participants, 52% were women; 72% Black; 46% Hispanic; median age, 37 years; median CD4+ count, 130 cells/mm3; median HIV-1 RNA, 4.6 log10 copies/mL; 46% had confirmed TB. LPV concentrations were similar across arms. Pooled LPV AUC12 (157 203 hours × ng/mL) and Ctrough (9876 ng/mL) were similar to historical controls; RBT AUC24 (7374 hours × ng/mL) and Ctrough (208 ng/mL) were higher, although 3 participants in arm C had RBT Cmax <250 ng/mL. Proportions with week 48 HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL were 58%, 67%, and 61%, respectively, in arms A, B, and C.. Double-dose LPV/r+RIF and LPV/r+RBT 150mg/day had acceptable safety, PK and TB outcomes; HIV suppression was suboptimal but unrelated to PK. Faster RBT clearance and low Cmax in 3 participants on RBT+RAL requires further study.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Rifabutin; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) study A5303 investigated the associations between neuropsychological performance (NP) and inflammatory biomarkers in HIV-infected participants. Fifteen NP tests were administered at baseline and week 48 to 233 ART naïve participants randomized to maraviroc- or tenofovir-containing ART. Neurocognition correlated modestly with markers of lymphocyte activation and inflammation pre-ART (percent CD38+/HLA-DR+(CD4+) (r = - 0.22, p = 0.02) and percent CD38+/HLA-DR+(CD8+) (r = - 0.25, p = 0.02)), and with some monocyte subsets during ART (r = 0.25, p = 0.02). Higher interleukin-6 and percent CD38+/HLA-DR+(CD8+) were independently associated with worse severity of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) (p = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). More studies to identify HAND biomarkers are needed.

Topics: Adult; AIDS Dementia Complex; Anti-HIV Agents; Biomarkers; Darunavir; Double-Blind Method; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Inflammation; Male; Maraviroc; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

Doravirine is a novel, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that has shown non-inferior efficacy to ritonavir-boosted darunavir, with a superior lipid profile, in adults with HIV who were treatment naive at week 48 in the phase 3 DRIVE-FORWARD trial. Here we present the 96-week data for the study.. This randomised, controlled, double-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 study was undertaken at 125 clinical centres in 15 countries. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) infected with HIV-1 who were naive to antiretroviral therapy, with a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration of 1000 copies per mL or higher at screening, and no known resistance to any of the study drugs. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive voice and web response system, stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA concentration and background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy, to doravirine (100 mg per day) or ritonavir-boosted darunavir (100 mg ritonavir and 800 mg darunavir per day), both with investigator-selected nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors: emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or abacavir and lamivudine. Participants and investigators were masked to treatment assignment until week 96. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who had a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration of less than 50 copies per mL at week 48, which has been reported previously. Here we report the key secondary efficacy endpoint of the proportion of participants who achieved this concentration by week 96, assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug, regardless of whether it was their randomly assigned treatment. We used a US Food and Drug Administration snapshot approach and a margin of 10 percentage points to define the non-inferiority of doravirine to ritonavir-boosted darunavir at 96 weeks. Key safety endpoints were change in fasting serum lipid concentrations, the incidence of adverse events, and time to discontinuation due to an adverse event, assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of any study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02275780, and is closed to accrual.. Between Dec 1, 2014, and Oct 20, 2015, 1027 individuals were screened, of whom 769 participants were randomly assigned to doravirine (n=385) or ritonavir-boosted darunavir (n=384), and 383 in both groups were given at least one dose of their allocated treatment. Most participants were male (645 [84%] of 766) and white (560 [73%]), with a mean age of 35·2 years (SD 10·6). 292 participants in the doravirine group and 273 in the darunavir group completed 96 weeks of treatment. At week 96, a higher proportion of the doravirine group (277 [73%] of 383) achieved an HIV-1 RNA concentration of less than 50 copies per mL than did of the darunavir group (248 [66%] of 383; difference 7·1%, 95% CI 0·5-13·7). Responses were similar regardless of baseline characteristics. Treatment-emergent resistance to any study drug occurred in two (1%) of 383 participants in the doravirine group and one (<1%) of 383 in the ritonavir-boosted darunavir group. Significant differences were seen between treatment groups in mean changes from baseline in LDL cholesterol (-14·6 mg/dL, 95% CI -18·2 to -11·0) and non-HDL cholesterol (-18·4 mg/dL, -22·5 to -14·3). Frequencies of adverse events were similar between groups. No significant treatment difference (log-rank nominal p=0·063) through week 96 was observed in time to discontinuation due to an adverse event. The most common adverse events (week 0-96) were diarrhoea (65 [17%] in the doravirine group vs 91 [24%] in the ritonavir-boosted darunavir group), nausea (45 [12%] vs 52 [14%]), headache (57 [15%] vs 46 [12%]), and upper respiratory tract infection (51 [13%] vs 30 [8%]). Two participants, one in each group, died during treatment; neither death was considered to be related to study medication.. These results through 96 weeks support the efficacy and safety results reported previously for doravirine at 48 weeks, supporting the use of doravirine for the long-term treatment of adults with previously untreated HIV-1 infection.. Merck.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Double-Blind Method; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridones; Ritonavir; Triazoles; Young Adult

NEAT001/ANRS143 demonstrated non-inferiority of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) + twice-daily raltegravir (400 mg) versus darunavir/ritonavir + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (245/200 mg once daily) in treatment-naive patients. We investigated the population pharmacokinetics of darunavir, ritonavir, tenofovir and emtricitabine and relationships with demographics, genetic polymorphisms and virological failure.. Non-linear mixed-effects models (NONMEM v. 7.3) were applied to determine pharmacokinetic parameters and assess demographic covariates and relationships with SNPs (SLCO3A1, SLCO1B1, NR1I2, NR1I3, CYP3A5*3, CYP3A4*22, ABCC2, ABCC10, ABCG2 and SCL47A1). The relationship between model-predicted darunavir AUC0-24 and C24 with time to virological failure was evaluated by Cox regression.. Of 805 enrolled, 716, 720, 347 and 361 were included in the darunavir, ritonavir, tenofovir and emtricitabine models, respectively (11% female, 83% Caucasian). No significant effect of patient demographics or SNPs was observed for darunavir or tenofovir apparent oral clearance (CL/F); coadministration of raltegravir did not influence darunavir or ritonavir CL/F. Ritonavir CL/F decreased by 23% in NR1I2 63396C>T carriers and emtricitabine CL/F was linearly associated with creatinine clearance (P<0.001). No significant relationship was demonstrated between darunavir AUC0-24 or C24 and time to virological failure [HR (95% CI): 2.28 (0.53-9.80), P=0.269; and 1.82 (0.61-5.41), P=0.279, respectively].. Darunavir concentrations were unaltered in the presence of raltegravir and not associated with virological failure. Polymorphisms investigated had little impact on study-drug pharmacokinetics. Darunavir/ritonavir + raltegravir may be an appropriate option for patients experiencing NRTI-associated toxicity.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Constitutive Androstane Receptor; Darunavir; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver-Specific Organic Anion Transporter 1; Male; Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2; Pharmacogenetics; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Viral Load

In the Promoting Maternal and Infant Survival Everywhere (PROMISE) trial, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) use was associated with moderate or severe adverse pregnancy/neonatal outcomes. This study characterized tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) and emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP) concentrations in dried blood spots (DBS) and assessed association between severe adverse pregnancy/neonatal outcomes and TFV-DP concentration.. Retrospective case-control study of PROMISE trial arm-C women randomized to receive TDF, FTC, and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r), who took at least 1 dose of TDF + FTC and had week-4 postrandomization DBS drawn before delivery. Cases, defined as severe adverse pregnancy/neonatal outcomes (very preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation, stillbirth ≥20 weeks of gestation, or infant death before 14 days-of-age), were matched to controls (1:2 ratio) by site and gestational age at entry. Week 4 and week 8 DBS samples were assayed for TFV-DP and FTC-TP by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Associations were tested using Wilcoxon rank test and conditional logistic regression.. Of 447 PROMISE arm-C women, 33 met case definitions, and overall, 22 cases and 44 controls were analyzed. Median (interquartile range) concentrations of TFV-DP at weeks 4 and 8 were 706 (375-1023) fmol/punch and 806 (414-1265) fmol/punch, respectively. Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for severe adverse pregnancy/neonatal outcome with natural log of TFV-DP concentrations as the predictor were 1.27 (0.74 to 2.18) and 1.74 (0.66 to 4.60) at weeks 4 and 8, respectively. Median (interquartile range) concentrations of FTC-TP at weeks 4 and 8 were 0.27 (0.05-0.36) pmol/punch and 0.29 (0.05-0.40) pmol/punch, respectively.. TFV-DP concentrations in DBS appeared not to be associated with severe adverse pregnancy/neonatal outcomes, although sample size was limited.

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; Case-Control Studies; Chromatography, Liquid; Drug Combinations; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Logistic Models; Lopinavir; Medication Adherence; Organophosphates; Polyphosphates; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

Darunavir/ritonavir is better tolerated than lopinavir/ritonavir and has a higher genetic barrier to resistance. Co-administration with rifampicin has been contraindicated as a significant reduction in darunavir exposure is expected. This is a barrier to darunavir/ritonavir use where TB is endemic.. To evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of adjusted doses of darunavir/ritonavir with rifampicin.. Virally suppressed participants on second-line lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART were switched to darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg q24h. In sequence: rifampicin was added; the dose of ritonavir was escalated; and darunavir was increased (darunavir/ritonavir 1600/200 mg q24h and 800/100 mg q12h were given in randomized sequence with rifampicin). Darunavir plasma concentrations were measured on the seventh/last day of each treatment period. To prevent viral rebound, dolutegravir (50 mg q12h) was added during rifampicin administration and for 1 week thereafter. Clinical events, ALT and bilirubin were monitored every 2-3 days during rifampicin administration.. A total of 17/28 participants started study treatment. Six (35.3%) were withdrawn for symptomatic hepatitis with severe ALT elevations, developing after 9-11 days of rifampicin and 2-4 days of ritonavir 200 mg. The study was stopped prematurely due to this high rate of hepatotoxicity. Only four participants completed the study. All hepatotoxicity resolved on withdrawal of study treatment. All participants were successfully re-established on their lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen. After doubling the darunavir/ritonavir doses on rifampicin, darunavir pre-dose concentrations approached those on standard doses without rifampicin for q12h doses, but not for q24h doses.. Adjusted doses of darunavir/ritonavir with rifampicin had unacceptable risk of hepatotoxicity. Darunavir trough concentrations were markedly reduced with the daily adjusted dose.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Rifampin; Ritonavir

In AIDS Clinical Trials Group study A5316, efavirenz lowered plasma concentrations of etonogestrel and ethinyl estradiol, given as a vaginal ring, while atazanavir/ritonavir increased etonogestrel and lowered ethinyl estradiol concentrations. We characterized the pharmacogenetics of these interactions.. In A5316, women with HIV enrolled into control (no antiretrovirals), efavirenz [600 mg daily with nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)], and atazanavir/ritonavir (300/100 mg daily with NRTIs) groups. On day 0, a vaginal ring was inserted, releasing etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol 120/15 μg/day. Intensive plasma sampling for antiretrovirals was obtained on days 0 and 21, and single samples for etonogestrel and ethinyl estradiol on days 7, 14, and 21. Seventeen genetic polymorphisms were analyzed.. The 72 participants in this analysis included 25, 24 and 23 in the control, efavirenz, and atazanavir/ritonavir groups, respectively. At day 21 in the efavirenz group, CYP2B6 genotype was associated with increased plasma efavirenz exposure (P = 3.2 × 10), decreased plasma concentrations of etonogestrel (P = 1.7 × 10), and decreased ethinyl estradiol (P = 6.7 × 10). Compared to controls, efavirenz reduced median etonogestrel concentrations by at least 93% in CYP2B6 slow metabolizers versus approximately 75% in normal and intermediate metabolizers. Efavirenz reduced median ethinyl estradiol concentrations by 75% in CYP2B6 slow metabolizers versus approximately 41% in normal and intermediate metabolizers.. CYP2B6 slow metabolizer genotype worsens the pharmacokinetic interaction of efavirenz with hormonal contraceptives administered by vaginal ring. Efavirenz dose reduction in CYP2B6 slow metabolizers may reduce, but will likely not eliminate, this interaction.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Hormonal; Contraceptive Devices, Female; Cyclopropanes; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2B6; Desogestrel; Drug Interactions; Ethinyl Estradiol; Female; Genetic Association Studies; Genotype; HIV Infections; Humans; Middle Aged; Pharmacogenetics; Polymorphism, Genetic; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Ritonavir; Vagina

Few long-term data are available in subjects having initiated ART with an NRTI-sparing regimen.. Outcomes of subjects enrolled in the NEAT 001/ANRS 143 randomized clinical trial (comparing ritonavir-boosted darunavir + raltegravir versus ritonavir-boosted darunavir + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine) were retrospectively collected, through anonymized electronic case report forms, up to 6 years post-enrolment.. The last NEAT 001 visit (Week 96) was conducted in 745/805 randomized subjects (363/401 ritonavir-boosted darunavir + raltegravir and 382/404 ritonavir-boosted darunavir + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine). Of these, 430 were enrolled in NEAT 001/ANRS 143 LONG TERM (NLT) study (201 raltegravir, 229 tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine), with a median follow-up of 44.4 months.. During NLT follow-up, the proportion of AIDS, non-AIDS events, virological rebound and serious adverse events, discontinuation for virological failure and for adverse events did not differ between groups; discontinuations for virological failure since NEAT 001 inclusion were more frequent in subjects with baseline CD4 <200 cells/mm3 (11.9% versus 5.3%; P = 0.077). At last follow-up, a quarter of subjects (22.2% for ritonavir-boosted darunavir + raltegravir and 29.7% for ritonavir-boosted darunavir + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine) were still receiving their initial regimen. Integrase inhibitor exposure was not associated with weight gain (P = 0.48), while tenofovir disoproxil fumarate exposure was associated with a trend to higher creatinine increase (P = 0.067).. After a median of 5.6 years, subjects initiating ritonavir-boosted darunavir + raltegravir or ritonavir-boosted darunavir + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine experienced few serious clinical adverse events. Most discontinuations were for reasons unrelated to adverse events or virological failure.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Emtricitabine; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; Viral Load

Prior to the availability of rilpivirine (RPV), patients who could not tolerate efavirenz and nevirapine (NVP) were treated with protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART). Dyslipidaemia and other metabolic complications are commonly associated with PI use. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse events between switching from PI-based to RPV-based regimen, versus continuing PI-based regimens in HIV-positive individuals with complete viral suppression.. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in HIV-positive individuals receiving PI-based regimens with undetectable HIV RNA and without prior HIV drug resistance. Patients were enrolled between July and December 2017 in a university medical centre in Bangkok, Thailand. They were randomized to switch from PIs to RPV (switch group) or continue ritonavir-boosted PI (control group). Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with undetectable HIV RNA at 48 weeks. Changes in CD4 cell counts, lipid profiles and adverse events were also analysed.. Switching PIs to RPV, in patients with complete viral suppression and without prior HIV drug resistance, sustains viral suppression and yields better lipid profiles. This finding supports its use as switching therapy in patients receiving PI-based regimens due to intolerance to efavirenz and NVP and previous alternatives limited to PI in resource-limited settings.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Health Resources; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Rilpivirine; Ritonavir; Thailand; Triglycerides

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antivirals are highly effective. Less is known about changes in markers of immune activation in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in whom a sustained virologic response (SVR) is achieved.. We conducted a nonrandomized clinical trial of 12 or 24 weeks of paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir plus dasabuvir (PrOD) with or without ribavirin in persons with HCV-1/HIV coinfection suppressed with antiretroviral therapy. Plasma HCV, soluble CD14 (sCD14), interferon-inducible protein 10, soluble CD163 (sCD163), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 18, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1), autotaxin (ATX), and Mac2-binding protein (Mac2BP) were measured over 48 weeks.. Participants were treated with PrOD for 12 (n = 9) or 24 (n = 36) weeks; the SVR rate at 12 weeks was 93%. At baseline, cirrhosis was associated with higher ATX and MCP-1, female sex with higher ATX and IL-6, older age with higher Mac2BP, higher body mass index with higher ATX, and HIV-1 protease inhibitor use with higher sCD14 levels. In those with SVR, interferon-inducible protein 10, ATX, and Mac2BP levels declined by week 2, interleukin 18 levels declined by the end of treatment, sCD14 levels did not change, and sCD163, MCP-1, and IL-6 levels changed at a single time point.. During HIV/HCV coinfection, plasma immune activation marker heterogeneity is in part attributable to age, sex, cirrhosis, body mass index, and/or type of antiretroviral therapy. HCV treatment with paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir plus dasabuvir is highly effective and is associated with variable rate and magnitude of decline in markers of immune activation.. NCT02194998.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiviral Agents; Biomarkers; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Sustained Virologic Response; Uracil; Valine

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Compounding; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Food-Drug Interactions; Healthy Volunteers; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pentacyclic Triterpenes; Ritonavir; Safety; Tablets

Adolescents experience higher levels of non-adherence to HIV treatment. Drug concentration in hair promises to be reliable for assessing exposure to antiretroviral (ARV) drugs. Pharmacokinetic modelling can explore utility of drug in hair. We aimed at developing and validating a pharmacokinetic model based on atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) in hair and identify factors associated with variabilities in hair accumulation.. We based the study on secondary data analysis whereby data from a previous study on Zimbabwean adolescents which collected hair samples at enrolment and 3 months follow-up was used in model development. We performed model development in NONMEM (version 7.3) ADVAN 13.. There is 16% / 18% of the respective ATV/r in hair as a ratio of steady-state trough plasma concentrations. At follow-up, we estimated an increase of 30% /42% of respective ATV/r in hair. We associated a unit increase in adherence score with 2% increase in hair concentration both ATV/r. Thinner participants had 54% higher while overweight had 21% lower atazanavir in hair compared to normal weight participants. Adolescents receiving care from fellow siblings had atazanavir in hair at least 54% less compared to other forms of care.. The determinants of increased ATV/r concentrations in hair found in our analysis are monitoring at follow up event, body mass index, and caregiver status. Measuring drug concentration in hair is feasibly accomplished and could be more accurate for monitoring ARV drugs exposure.

Topics: Adolescent; Atazanavir Sulfate; Black People; Female; Hair; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Models, Biological; Ritonavir; Zimbabwe

Antiretroviral therapy for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa has transformed the highly infectious virus to a stable chronic condition, with the advent of Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The longterm effects of HAART on the oral health of children are understudied.. To compare the effect of lopinavir-ritonavir and lamivudine on oral health indicators (dental caries, gingivitis, tooth eruption, and oral health related quality of life) in 5 to 7 year old HIV-1 exposed uninfected children from the ANRS 12174 trial.. This study used data collected in 2017 among children aged 5 to 7 years from the Ugandan site of the ANRS 12174 randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT00640263) implemented between 2009 and 2012 in Mbale district, Eastern Uganda. The intervention was lopinavir-ritonavir or lamuvudine treatment to prevent vertical HIV-1 transmission. One hundred thirty-seven and 139 children were randomized to receive lopinavir-ritonavir or lamivudine treatment at day 7 postpartum to compare efficacy of prevention of vertical HIV-1 transmission. At follow up, the children underwent oral examination using the World Health Organization methods for field conditions. The oral health related quality of life was assessed using the early childhood oral health impact scale. Negative binomial and logistic regression were used for the analysis of data.. Dental caries, gingivitis, tooth eruption, and oral health related quality of life) in 5 to 7 year old HIV-1 exposed uninfected children.. The prevalence of dental caries was 48% in the study sample: 49% in the lopinavir-ritonavir arm and 48% in the lamivudine treatment group. The corresponding mean decayed missing filled teeth and standard deviation was 1.7 (2.4) and 2.3 (3.7) The mean number (standard deviation) of erupted permanent teeth was 3.8 (3.7) and 4.6 (3.9) teeth in the lopinavir- and lamivudine group, respectively. The prevalence of reported impacts on oral health was 7% in the lopinavir-ritonavir and 18% in the lamivudine group. Gingivitis had a prevalence of 7% in the lopinavir-ritonavir and 14% lamivudine treatment group. The regression analysis revealed 70% less reported impacts on oral health in lopinavir-ritonavir group than the lamivudine treatment group with an incidence rate ratio of 0.3 (95% confidence interval: 0.1-0.9).. HIV exposed uninfected infants in the lopinavir-ritonavir group reported less impacts on oral health than the lamivudine treatment group. Dental caries, gingivitis, and tooth eruption were not significantly affected by the treatment lopinavir-ritonavir or lamivudine. TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS.. NCT00640263.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Case-Control Studies; Child; Child, Preschool; Dental Caries; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gingivitis; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Oral Health; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Prevalence; Quality of Life; Ritonavir; Tooth Eruption; Uganda

Albuvirtide is a once-weekly injectable human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 fusion inhibitor. We present interim data for a phase 3 trial assessing the safety and efficacy of albuvirtide plus lopinavir-ritonavir in HIV-1-infected adults already treated with antiretroviral drugs.. We carried out a 48-week, randomized, controlled, open-label non-inferiority trial at 12 sites in China. Adults on the World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended first-line treatment for >6 months with a plasma viral load >1000 copies/mL were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive albuvirtide (once weekly) plus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (ABT group) or the WHO-recommended second-line treatment (NRTI group). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a plasma viral load below 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks. Non-inferiority was prespecified with a margin of 12%.. At the time of analysis, week 24 data were available for 83 and 92 patients, and week 48 data were available for 46 and 50 patients in the albuvirtide and NRTI groups, respectively. At 48 weeks, 80.4% of patients in the ABT group and 66.0% of those in the NRTI group had HIV-1 RNA levels below 50 copies/mL, meeting the criteria for non-inferiority. For the per-protocol population, the superiority of albuvirtide over NRTI was demonstrated. The frequency of grade 3 to 4 adverse events was similar in the two groups; the most common adverse events were diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infections, and grade 3 to 4 increases in triglyceride concentration. Renal function was significantly more impaired at 12 weeks in the patients of the NRTI group who received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate than in those of the ABT group.. The TALENT study is the first phase 3 trial of an injectable long-acting HIV drug. This interim analysis indicates that once-weekly albuvirtide in combination with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir is well tolerated and non-inferior to the WHO-recommended second-line regimen in patients with first-line treatment failure.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02369965; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.Chinese Clinical Trial Registry No. ChiCTR-TRC-14004276; http://www.chictr.org.cn/enindex.aspx.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; China; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Maleimides; Peptides; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Our aim was to investigate factors associated with baseline blood telomere length in participants enrolled in NEAT 001/ANRS 143, a randomized, open-label trial comparing ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) plus raltegravir (RAL) with DRV/r plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve HIV-positive adults.. A cross-sectional study of 201 randomly selected participants who had stored samples available was carried out. We measured telomere length (i.e. the relative telomere length, calculated as the telomere to single copy gene ratio) at baseline with monochrome quantitative multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We used multivariable predictive linear regression to calculate mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between baseline telomere length and baseline characteristics.. Both age and HIV RNA viral load correlated with shorter blood telomere length in untreated persons living with HIV. These results suggest that HIV infection and age have synergistic and independent impacts upon immunosenescence.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Cross-Sectional Studies; Darunavir; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Telomere; Tenofovir

Very few data are available on treatment in HIV Late presenter population that still represents a clinical challenge.. Prospective, multicenter, randomized open-label, 2 arm, phase-3 trial comparing the 48-week virological response of two different regimens: abacavir/lamivudine + darunavir/r vs abacavir/lamivudine + raltegravir in antiretroviral naive with CD4+ counts < 200/mm3 and a viral load (VL)<500,000 copies/mL. The primary Endpoint was the proportion of patients with undetectable viremia (VL<50 copies/mL) after 48 weeks. The planned sample size for this trial was 350 patients.. In 3 years, 53 patients were screened and 46 enrolled: 22 randomized to raltegravir and 24 to darunavir/r; 7 patients were excluded, 4 because of a VL >500,000 copies/mL and 3 for HLAB5701 positivity. The snapshot analysis at 48 weeks showed a virologic success of 77.3% in raltegravir and 66.7% in darunavir/r. Time to starting treatment was 34.5 days in raltegravir and 53 days in darunavir/r. At the as treated analysis, the median CD4 counts at 48 weeks was 297 cells/μL in raltegravir and 239 cells/μL in darunavir/r. No difference in total cholesterol, while triglycerides were higher in the darunavir/r arm. No statistical analyses were performed due to the low number of patients enrolled.. Late presenter patients are frequent but very difficult to enroll in clinical trials, especially in western countries. These regimens and the conditions of many patients could not allow the test and treat strategy. The rate of virologic success was higher than 65% in both arms with a median CD4 cell count >200/μL at week 48.. EUDRACT number: 2011-005973-21.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Delayed Diagnosis; Dideoxynucleosides; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir

To evaluate the association between HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) and preterm birth (PTB), when defined by gold standard antenatal ultrasound versus newborn exam.. A secondary analysis of the PROMISE 1077BF/1077FF randomized controlled trial, which compared antiretroviral strategies to reduce perinatal HIV transmission and improve maternal health. The trial used newborn exam (i.e. New Ballard Score, NBS) to assess gestational age. This analysis included liveborn singleton pregnancies with both newborn exam and ultrasound data. The primary exposure was the trial's antiretroviral strategies: zidovudine with intrapartum nevirapine ('ZDV alone'); zidovudine/lamivudine/lopinavir-ritonavir ('ZDV-based ART'); or tenofovir/emtricitabine/lopinavir-ritonavir ('TDF-based ART'). The primary outcome was PTB less than 37 and less than 34 weeks based on the gold standard of ultrasound dating. We evaluated the association between antiretroviral strategy and PTB. We fit multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for maternal characteristics, obstetric history, and HIV disease severity.. Among 720 assessed pregnant women, PTB less than 37 weeks was 15.4% by NBS and 18.3% by ultrasound. The NBS was specific but not sensitive for PTB less than 37 weeks (92.0% and 48.5%). Women receiving ZDV-based and TDF-based ART had significantly higher odds of PTB less than 37 by ultrasound compared with ZDV alone (adjusted odds ratios: 1.68; 95% confidence interval 1.10-2.57, and 2.71; 95% confidence interval 1.39-5.29), as well as for PTB less than 34 weeks. These results held for ultrasounds performed less than 24 weeks, and were generally consistent with prior analyses from the PROMISE trial using the NBS.. Women starting HIV ART in pregnancy remained at higher risk of PTB when determined by ultrasound, consistent with prior data using newborn exam. However, newborn exam misclassified cases of PTB compared with gold standard ultrasound.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; Gestational Age; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Logistic Models; Lopinavir; Nevirapine; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth; Risk; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Young Adult; Zidovudine

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated neurocognitive disorders can persist in many patients despite achieving viral suppression while on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Neurocognitive function over 48 weeks was evaluated using a Cogstate test battery assessing psychomotor function, attention, learning, and working memory in 293 HIV-1-infected, ART-experienced, and virologically suppressed adults. The ASSURE study randomized participants 1:2 to remain on tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) or simplify to abacavir/lamivudine + atazanavir (ABC/3TC + ATV). Neurocognitive z-scores were computed using demographically adjusted normative data and were classified as "impaired" (defined as either a z-score ≤ - 2 or having 2 or more standardized individual test z-scores ≤ - 1); while higher scores (equaling better performance) were classified as "normal". By z-scores, 54.7% of participants had impaired neurocognition at baseline and 50.2% at week 48. There were no significant differences (p < 0.05) in the baseline-adjusted performance between treatment groups for any individual test or by z-score. Specific demographic and medical risk factors were evaluated by univariate analysis for impact on neurocognitive performance. Factors with p < 0.10 were evaluated by backwards regression analysis to identify neurocognition-correlated factors after accounting for treatment, assessment, and baseline. Four risk factors at baseline for impaired neurocognition were initially identified: lower CD4 nadir lymphocyte counts, higher Framingham risk scores, and interleukin-6 levels, and a history of psychiatric disorder not otherwise specified, however none were found to moderate the effect of treatment on neurocognition. In this aviremic, treatment-experienced population, baseline-adjusted neurocognitive function remained stable and equivalent over 48 weeks with both TDF/FTC + ATV/r-treated and in the ART-simplified ABC/3TC + ATV treatment groups.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cognition; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Interleukin-6; Lamivudine; Male; Memory, Short-Term; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Semen; Tissue Distribution; Virus Shedding

Topics: Adult; Amides; Antiviral Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Imidazoles; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Quinoxalines; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Young Adult

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; Disease Progression; Drug Substitution; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Maraviroc; Middle Aged; Ritonavir

The tolerance of antiretroviral drugs in infants must be carefully evaluated. In previous studies of children with HIV type 1 (HIV-1) less weight gain was observed in children given lopinavir-ritonavir-based combinations than those given nevirapine. We aimed to compare the effects of lopinavir-ritonavir and lamivudine on growth in HIV-exposed uninfected infants included in the ANRS 12174 trial.. ANRS 12174 was a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial of infant prophylaxis to prevent HIV-1 transmission by breastfeeding done at four antenatal clinics in Burkina Faso, South Africa, Uganda, and Zambia. HIV-exposed uninfected infants born to asymptomatic mothers not eligible for antiretroviral therapy (CD4 count >350 cells per μL) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive lopinavir-ritonavir or lamivudine 7 days after birth, with stratification by country. In a prespecified secondary analysis, we assessed the effect of lopinavir-ritonavir and lamivudine on the growth of these infants from day 7 until cessation of breastfeeding (maximum treatment time 12 months) in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all children correctly enrolled with at least one follow-up anthropometric measurement. We compared the growth of infants, defined as children's WHO-defined length-for-age Z score (LAZ), weight-for-length Z score (WAZ), and weight-for-age Z score (WLZ). We used linear mixed effect and β spline-regression models to compare growth between the treatment groups. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00640263.. 1273 HIV-exposed uninfected infants and their mothers were enrolled between Nov 16, 2009, and May 7, 2013, of whom 1266 (99%) infants were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (630 assigned to lopinavir-ritonavir, 636 assigned to lamivudine). Baseline characteristics of the infants and mothers were similar across the two treatment groups. No differences in least-squares (LS) mean LAZ were identified between the treatment groups at any timepoint. LS mean WLZ was significantly lower in the lopinavir-ritonavir group than the lamivudine group at 26 weeks (difference -0·22 [95% CI -0·34 to -0·09], p=0·0006) and 50 weeks (-0·25 [-0·47 to -0·04], p=0·02). LS mean WAZ was also significantly lower in the lopinavir-ritonavir group than the lamivudine group at 26 weeks (difference -0·18 [95% CI -0·30 to -0·05], p=0·01) and 50 weeks (-0·24 [-0·45 to -0·05], p=0·02). Linear mixed models showed that lopinavir-ritonavir was associated with decreases in WLZ and WAZ over time (p<0·0001 and p=0·002), whereas spline regression models indicated that these reductions occurred early and remained constant thereafter (p<0·0001 with a knot at 44 days for WLZ; p=0·02 with a knot at 118 days for WAZ). The difference in LS mean WLZ at 50 weeks between the treatment groups was higher among girls than boys (difference -0·29 [95% CI -0·58 to 0·01], p=0·05 for girls; -0·22 [-0·53 to 0·09], p=0·18 for boys).. Less weight gain was observed in infants given lopinavir-ritonavir than those given lamivudine, which is indicative of a persistent effect that could have long-term deleterious effects. This finding merits attention considering the recommendations for early and lifelong treatment of infants with HIV.. French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis, the Total Foundation, the European Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, and the Research Council of Norway.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

Pilot studies suggest that ritonavir-boosted darunavir could show high efficacy at doses below those currently approved. We investigated whether switch to 400 mg of darunavir boosted with 100 mg ritonavir once daily could show equivalent efficacy to continuation of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (a protease inhibitor commonly used in low-income and middle-income countries) for individuals with HIV RNA suppression.. In the WRHI 052 study, a randomised, parallel-group, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial, adults who were HIV-1 positive were enrolled in Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa. Eligible participants were 18 years or older, who tolerated ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in combination with two nucleoside analogues (standard of care) for 6 months or more, and had plasma HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL within 60 days of enrolment. We randomly assigned participants (1:1), using a computer-generated randomisation plan, to switch to darunavir (400 mg) boosted with ritonavir (100 mg) once daily or remain on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (800 mg [plus 200 mg ritonavir]), with nucleoside analogues left unchanged. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with less than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL at week 48 (US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm; non-inferiority margin -4%). Primary and safety analyses included participants receiving at least one dose of darunavir boosted with ritonavir. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02671383.. Between June 30, 2016, and June 15, 2017, 148 participants were assigned to ritonavir-boosted darunavir 400 mg and 152 continued on their lopinavir-containing regimen. Four (3%) patients in the darunavir group and three (2%) in the lopinavir group discontinued before week 48. At week 48, darunavir was non-inferior to lopinavir for the primary outcome (142 [96%] of 148 participants on darunavir had <50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL vs 143 [94%] of 152 participants on lopinavir; difference 1·9% [95% CI -3·4 to 7·3]), with a predefined margin of -4%. More participants taking darunavir (30 [20%] participants) had drug-related adverse events than those on lopinavir (eight [5%]), but the adverse events were generally asymptomatic and resolved when switching back to lopinavir. Elevated liver transaminase in three (1%; one symptomatic) darunavir participants led to study withdrawal; all transaminase elevations resolved on restarting lopinavir.. Low-dose ritonavir-boosted darunavir might be a safe and efficacious switch option to maintain HIV suppression for patients on lopinavir. However, an adequately powered and designed study in viraemic participants is needed.. South African Medical Research Council, United States Agency for International Development, and US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

In sub-Saharan Africa, detecting resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) at failure of first-line ART with two NRTIs plus an NNRTI predicts improved virological responses to second-line therapy with two NRTIs plus a ritonavir-boosted PI (PI/r). This indicates residual NRTI activity in the presence of RAMs, although additional factors may contribute to the effect.. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of pre-existing RAMs on the outcomes of maintenance monotherapy with ritonavir-boosted darunavir within a randomized trial in Cameroon.. RAMs were detected in HIV-1 DNA using PBMCs collected at initiation of darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy. Adherence was assessed by pill count and visual analogue scale (VAS). Predictors of virological failure (confirmed or last available viral load >400 copies/mL) were explored by logistic regression analysis. Trial name = MANET (NCT02155101).. After NNRTI-based therapy, participants (n = 81) had received PI/r-based therapy for a median of 3.2 years and had a confirmed viral load <60 copies/mL and a median CD4 count of 466 cells/mm3. NRTI and NNRTI RAMs were detected in 39/60 (65.0%) and 41/60 (68.3%) HIV-1 DNA sequences, respectively. Over 48 weeks of monotherapy, 16/81 (19.8%) patients experienced virological failure. After adjusting for age, HIV-1 DNA load, adherence by VAS and RAM status, virological failure was less likely with higher VAS-measured adherence (adjusted OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.37; P = 0.004) and detectable HIV-1 DNA RAMs (adjusted OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.82; P = 0.028).. Pre-existing NRTI and NNRTI RAMs are associated with improved virological responses to NRTI-sparing ART in sub-Saharan Africa, indicating a predictive effect that is independent of residual NRTI activity.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Cameroon; Darunavir; DNA, Viral; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Viral Load

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) management is challenging for individuals in resource-limited settings presenting for third-line treatment because of complex resistance patterns, partly due to reduced access to viral load monitoring. We aimed to evaluate use of newer antiretroviral drugs and contemporary management approaches, including population-based sequencing, to select appropriate antiretrovirals, plasma viral load monitoring, and interventions to improve adherence in individuals presenting with second-line viral failure.. A5288 was a phase 4, third-line ART strategy study done at 19 urban sites in ten countries that enrolled adult participants with confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA (viral load) of 1000 copies per mL or more after more than 24 weeks of protease inhibitor-based second-line ART. The primary objective was to use antiretrovirals (raltegravir, etravirine, and ritonavir-boosted darunavir) and diagnostic monitoring technologies, including viral load, genotyping, and adherence support to achieve viral load suppression (defined as ≤200 copies per mL) in 65% or more of participants. ART history and real-time drug resistance genotypes were used to assign participants to one of four cohorts: cohort A (no lopinavir resistance) stayed on second-line ART and cohorts B (B1, best available nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs] plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus raltegravir; B2, ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus raltegravir plus etravirine; B3, ritonavir-boosted darunavir, raltegravir, and either tenofovir plus emtricitabine or tenofovir plus lamivudine), C (ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus raltegravir plus tenofovir-emtricitabine or tenofovir plus lamivudine), and D (best available NRTIs plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus raltegravir) were defined by increasing levels of resistance and received appropriate regimens, including new antiretrovirals. Participants in Cohort B without detectable hepatitis B surface antigen were assigned by blocked randomisation to cohorts B1 and B2, and those with detectable hepatitis B surface antigen were assigned to cohort B3. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01641367.. From Jan 10, 2013, to Sept 10, 2015, 545 participants were enrolled. 287 (53%) were assigned to cohort A, 74 (14%) to B1, 72 (13%) to B2, eight (1%) to B3, 70 (13%) to C, and 34 (6%) to D. Overall, 349 (64%, 95% CI 60-68) participants achieved viral suppression at week 48, with proportions varying from 125 (44%) of 287 in cohort A to 65 (88%) of 74 in cohort B1, 63 (88%) of 72 in B2, eight (100%) of eight in B3, 63 (90%) of 70 in C, and 25 (74%) of 34 in D. Participants in cohort A remained on their second-line protease inhibitor, and had the most participants with grade 3 or higher adverse events (147 [51%]).. Targeted real-time genotyping to select third-line ART can appropriately allocate more costly antiretrovirals to those with greater levels of HIV drug resistance.. National Institutes of Health.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cohort Studies; Darunavir; Developing Countries; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Prospective Studies; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Viral Load

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends weight band dosing of antiretrovirals for children. Data are limited describing drug exposure/safety of lopinavir/ritonavir using WHO weight band dosing.. International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials (IMPAACT) P1083 was a phase II/III trial assessing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and short-term safety, tolerance and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children 3-25 kg dosed according to WHO weight bands, with liquid solution or meltrex extrusion tablets. The main PK target was an area under the curve (AUC0-24) of 80-320 μg·h/mL.. Of 97 enrolled participants, median age 2.5 years, 89 (91.8%) completed the protocol. Median LPV dose was 303 mg/m. The geometric mean (90% confidence limits) LPV PK AUC0-24 was 196 (177-217) μg·h/mL and Cmin was 2.47 (1.52-4.02) μg/mL. AUC0-24 was within the target range for 79% of participants. The median (Q1, Q3) difference between individual observed PK parameters and those expected if Food and Drug Administration dosing guidelines were followed was 30.7 (7.9, 54.3) for AUC0-24 and 0.56 (0, 1.27) for Cmin. Ten (10%) participants had grade 3 or 4 events deemed related to study treatment, mostly asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities. Three participants died of unrelated study treatment causes. At week 24, 57 of 79 (72%) participants reached viral suppression and the median increase in CD4% (n = 83) was 6.0 (P < 0.0001).. WHO weight band dosing guidelines in children achieved adequate LPV plasma exposure but was higher than that expected with Food and Drug Administration dosing guidelines. Despite the higher LPV exposure, the treatment was well tolerated and the 24-week efficacy data were favorable.

Topics: Area Under Curve; Body Weight; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Pharmacogenomic Testing; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Ritonavir; Viral Load; World Health Organization

Millions of HIV-infected people worldwide receive antiretroviral therapy (ART) in programmes using WHO-recommended standardised regimens. Recent WHO guidelines recommend a boosted protease inhibitor plus raltegravir as an alternative second-line combination. We assessed whether this treatment option offers any advantage over the standard protease inhibitor plus two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) second-line combination after 144 weeks of follow-up in typical programme settings.. We analysed the 144-week outcomes at the completion of the EARNEST trial, a randomised controlled trial done in HIV-infected adults or adolescents in 14 sites in five sub-Saharan African countries (Uganda, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Kenya, Zambia). Participants were those who were no longer responding to non-NRTI-based first-line ART, as assessed with WHO criteria, confirmed by viral-load testing. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (lopinavir 400 mg with ritonavir 100 mg, twice per day) plus two or three clinician-selected NRTIs (protease inhibitor plus NRTI group), protease inhibitor plus raltegravir (400 mg twice per day; protease inhibitor plus raltegravir group), or protease inhibitor monotherapy (plus raltegravir induction for first 12 weeks, re-intensified to combination therapy after week 96; protease inhibitor monotherapy group). Randomisation was by computer-generated randomisation sequence, with variable block size. The primary outcome was viral load of less than 400 copies per mL at week 144, for which we assessed non-inferiority with a one-sided α of 0·025, and superiority with a two-sided α of 0·025. The EARNEST trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 37737787.. Between April 12, 2010, and April 29, 2011, 1837 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 1277 patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group. In the primary (complete-case) analysis at 144 weeks, 317 (86%) of 367 in the protease inhibitor plus NRTI group had viral loads of less than 400 copies per mL compared with 312 (81%) of 383 in the protease inhibitor plus raltegravir group (p=0·07; lower 95% confidence limit for difference 10·2% vs specified non-inferiority margin 10%). In the protease inhibitor monotherapy group, 292 (78%) of 375 had viral loads of less than 400 copies per mL; p=0·003 versus the protease inhibitor plus NRTI group at 144 weeks. There was no difference between groups in serious adverse events, grade 3 or 4 adverse events (total or ART-related), or events that resulted in treatment modification.. Protease inhibitor plus raltegravir offered no advantage over protease inhibitor plus NRTI in virological efficacy or safety. In the primary analysis, protease inhibitor plus raltegravir did not meet non-inferiority criteria. A regimen of protease inhibitor with NRTIs remains the best standardised second-line regimen for use in programmes in resource-limited settings.. European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP), UK Medical Research Council, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Irish Aid, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Instituto Superiore di Sanita, Merck, ViiV Healthcare, WHO.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Africa South of the Sahara; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Child; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) use in pregnancy has been associated with hormonal dysregulation. We performed a secondary retrospective analysis of longitudinal progesterone and estradiol levels in pregnancy using specimens from the Protease Inhibitors to Reduce Malaria Morbidity in HIV-infected Pregnant Women study, which randomized Ugandan human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected ART-naive women to initiate either lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based or efavirenz (EFV)-based cART.. Three hundred twenty-six women (160 randomized to the EFV arm and 166 women to the LPV/r arm) with at least 1 plasma sample collected during pregnancy were included. Enrollment samples collected prior to cART initiation were used as a cART-naive comparator group. Hormone levels were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.. Estradiol levels were differentially affected by the 2 cART regimens. Exposure to LPV/r was associated with an increase in estradiol (P < .0001), whereas exposure to EFV was associated with a decrease in estradiol (P < .0001), relative to the cART-naive gestationally matched comparator group. Lower estradiol levels correlated with small for gestational age (SGA) (P = .0019) and low birth weight (P = .019) in the EFV arm, while higher estradiol levels correlated with SGA in the LPV/r arm (P = .027). Although progesterone levels were similar between treatment arms, we observed an association between SGA and lower progesterone in the LPV/r arm (P = .04). No association was observed between hormone levels and preterm birth in either arm. Levels of progesterone and estradiol were lower in cases of stillbirth, and levels of both hormones declined immediately prior to stillbirth in 5 of 8 cases.. Combination ART regimens differentially affect estradiol levels in pregnancy, a hormone critical to the maintenance of a healthy pregnancy. Identifying cART regimens that minimize perinatal HIV transmission without contributing to hormonal dysregulation represents an urgent public health priority.. NCT00993031.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Estradiol; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Progesterone; Ritonavir; Uganda

Fostemsavir is a prodrug of temsavir, an attachment inhibitor that binds to HIV-1 gp120, blocking viral attachment to host CD4 T-cells. The phase 2b trial AI438011 investigated the safety, efficacy, and dose-response of fostemsavir vs ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected subjects.. Two hundred fifty-one treatment-experienced subjects with baseline (BL) susceptibility to study drugs [temsavir half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) <100 nM, PhenoSense Entry assay] received fostemsavir or ATV/r, each with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate + raltegravir. Subjects meeting resistance-testing criteria were assessed for emergent viral drug resistance. Changes in temsavir IC50 from BL was given a conservative technical cutoff (>3-fold increase).. 66/200 fostemsavir and 14/51 ATV/r subjects had resistance testing performed; 44/66 and 9/14 were successfully tested using the PhenoSense GT assay. No subjects had emergent tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or ATV resistance. Six fostemsavir-treated subjects developed emergent raltegravir resistance. 29/66 fostemsavir-treated subjects had an evaluable phenotype using PhenoSense Entry (which tests for viral susceptibility to temsavir) and 13/29 exhibited >3-fold increase in temsavir IC50 from BL. gp120 population sequencing was successful in 11/13 subjects and 7 had emergent substitutions in gp120 associated with reduced temsavir susceptibility (S375, M426, or M434). However, 5/13 fostemsavir-treated subjects achieved subsequent suppression to <50 copies/mL before the week 48 database lock, regardless of key gp120 substitutions.. Response rates remained similar across study arms regardless of BL nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and protease inhibitor resistance-associated mutations. Emergent changes in viral susceptibility occurred more frequently with fostemsavir compared with ATV/r. However, the full impact of temsavir IC50 changes and emergent HIV-1 gp120 substitutions, and thus appropriate clinical cutoffs, requires further study. Fostemsavir is being evaluated in a phase 3 trial in heavily treatment-experienced subjects.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Envelope Protein gp120; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mutation, Missense; Organophosphates; Piperazines; Prodrugs; Ritonavir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Novel antiretroviral formulations that are palatable, safe, and effective are needed for infants and children.. PRINCE-2 is an ongoing clinical trial assessing safety, efficacy, and palatability of once-daily atazanavir powder formulation boosted with ritonavir (ATV + RTV) plus optimized dual nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors therapy in antiretroviral-naïve/experienced children with screening HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies/mL. Children 3 months to <11 years received ATV + RTV by 5 baseline weight bands: 5 to <10 kg = 150/80 mg; 5 to <10 kg = 200/80 mg; 10 to <15 kg = 200/80 mg; 15 to <25 kg = 250/80 mg; and 25 to <35 kg = 300/100 mg.. Of 99 treated children, 83.8% and 59.6% remained on ATV powder until 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. Through 48 weeks, the most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infections (33.3%), gastroenteritis (28.3%), vomiting (21.2%) and hyperbilirubinemia (18.2%; none leading to treatment discontinuation). Serious adverse events occurred in 20.2% of patients. Laboratory grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 9.2% and elevated total/pancreatic amylase in 33.7%/3.1%. At week 24, proportions with virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL; intention-to-treat analysis) across weight bands were 10/23 (43.5%), 2/12 (16.5%), 10/21 (47.6%), 19/35 (54.3%) and 5/8 (62.5%), respectively. Virologic suppression was similar in antiretroviral-naïve/experienced patients and lowest in the 5 to <10 kg = 200/80 mg group, likely because of higher baseline HIV-1 RNA and discontinuation (66.7%). Overall, virologic suppression at weeks 24 (46.5%) and 48 (43.0%) was comparable. At week 48, 83.3% and 74.1% of caregivers reported no trouble giving ATV powder and RTV, respectively.. ATV powder palatability, efficacy and lack of unexpected safety findings support its use for HIV-1-infected children ≥3 months to <11 years.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Male; Powders; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral

Two clinical studies (PRINCE-1 and -2) in HIV-1-infected children assessed the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of dual nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor background therapy plus once-daily atazanavir (ATV) powder formulation boosted with ritonavir (ATV + RTV). Here, we present a combined analysis of ATV pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics across these studies.. Intensive 24-hour pharmacokinetic profiles at steady state compared ATV exposures (area under the concentration-time curve in one dosing interval) in 5 ATV + RTV baseline weight-band dosing categories, with historic data in adults receiving ATV + RTV 300/100 mg capsules. Repeated ATV Ctrough measurements over 48 weeks explored relationships between ATV composite Ctrough quartiles (CCQs) with virologic efficacy and key safety parameters.. Of 146 children included in this combined analysis, 49.3% were male, 56.8% were Black/African American and 62.3% were antiretroviral experienced. Proportions with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48 were 13/32, 24/32, 19/32 and 13/28 in the lowest through highest ATV CCQs, respectively. Mean changes from baseline in total bilirubin at week 48 were +0.3, +0.5, +0.6 and +1.0 mg/dL in the lowest through highest ATV CCQs, respectively. Corresponding proportions with adverse events of hyperbilirubinemia by week 48 were 1/36, 4/36, 5/36 and 13/35, respectively. Changes from baseline in total amylase or electrocardiogram parameters and adverse events of diarrhea did not vary by ATV CCQs.. Weight-band dosing of ATV + RTV plus optimized dual nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in young HIV-1-infected children achieved similar ATV exposure to that in adults; no unexpected safety findings occurred, and with the exception of lower virologic suppression in the lowest ATV CCQ, there was no apparent trend in virologic suppression across ATV CCQs.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Male; Ritonavir; Viral Load

CINAMMON is a phase IV, open-label, single-arm, pilot study assessing maraviroc (MVC) in the central nervous system (CNS) when added to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy (DRV/r) in virologically suppressed HIV-infected subjects. CCR5 tropic participants on DRV/r were recruited. Participants remained on DRV/r for 12 week (w) (control phase). MVC 150 mg qd was added w12-w36 (intervention phase). Lumbar puncture (LP) and neurocognitive function (Cogstate) examinations scheduled at baseline, w12 and w36; MRI before w12, again at w36. Primary endpoint was CSF inflammatory marker changes during intervention phase. Secondary endpoints included changes in NC function and MRI parameters. CSF/plasma DRV/r concentrations measured at w12 and w36, MVC at w36. Nineteen patients recruited, 15 completed (17M, 2F). Dropouts: headache (2), knee problem (could not attend, 1), personal reasons (1). Mean age (range) 45.4 years (27.2-65.1), 13/19 white, 10/19 MSM. No changes in selected CSF markers were seen w12-w36. Overall NC function did not improve w12-w36: total age adjusted z score improved by 0.27 (weighted paired t test; p = 0.11); for executive function only, age adjusted z score improved by 0.54 (p = 0.03). MRI brain parameters unchanged. DRV plasma:CSF concentration ratio unchanged between w12 (132) and w36 (112; p = 0.577, Wilcoxon signed-rank). MVC plasma:CSF concentration ratio was 35 at w36. No changes in neuroinflammatory markers seen. In this small study, addition of 24w MVC 150 mg qd to stable DRV/r monotherapy showed possible improvement in executive function with no global NC effect. Learning effect cannot be excluded. This effect should be further evaluated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Biomarkers; Central Nervous System; Cognition; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Executive Function; Female; Ferritins; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Maraviroc; Middle Aged; Neopterin; Pilot Projects; Psychomotor Performance; Ritonavir; S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit

The OPTIPRIM-ANRS 147 trial compared intensive combination ART (darunavir/ritonavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine, raltegravir and maraviroc) started early during primary HIV-1 infection with standard tritherapy with darunavir/ritonavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine. From month 6 to 18, the percentage of viral load values <50 copies/mL was lower in the pentatherapy arm than in the tritherapy arm. Here we compared antiretroviral drug concentrations between the two arms.. Plasma samples were collected from 50 patients at various times after drug administration. A Bayesian approach based on published population pharmacokinetic models was used to estimate residual drug concentrations (Ctrough) and exposures (AUC) in each patient. A mixed linear regression model was then used to compare the AUC and Ctrough values of each drug used in both groups.. Published models adequately described our data and could be used to predict Ctrough and AUC. No significant difference in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine and ritonavir parameters was found between the two arms. However, darunavir Ctrough and AUC were significantly lower in the pentatherapy arm than in the tritherapy arm (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively).. Adding maraviroc and raltegravir to darunavir-based tritherapy decreased darunavir concentrations. Compliance issues, maraviroc-darunavir interaction and raltegravir-darunavir interaction were suspected and may affect the kinetics of viral decay during pentatherapy. A specific pharmacokinetic interaction study is needed to explore the interactions between darunavir and maraviroc and raltegravir.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Maraviroc; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Plasma; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Viral Load; Young Adult

Until the introduction of dolutegravir (DTG), people living with HIV (PLWH) who have developed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations have had few other treatment options outside of regimens based on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r). Here we report treatment results among PLWH in Sweden with pre-existing NRTI mutations on antiretroviral treatment (ART) with DTG and one to two NRTIs. All PLWH on ART with DTG and one to two NRTIs with pre-existing NRTI mutations were retrospectively identified from the National InfCare HIV database. As controls, PLWH on PI/r and one to two NRTIs, matched according to Genotypic Susceptibility Score and observation time, were included. Data were collected as long as the study population was on treatment with DTG; controls were monitored for the same interval. Outcome was classified as either treatment success or failure. In total, 244 participants (122 individuals treated with DTG and 122 individuals treated with PI/r) were included. Median observation time was 78 weeks (interquartile range 50-98 weeks) for participants on DTG and 75 weeks (50-101 weeks) for individuals on PI/r. Viral failure was detected in four individuals treated with DTG and three individuals treated with PI/r, resulting in similar success rates of 96.7% and 97.5%, respectively. No new mutations were found among participants with treatment failure. DTG in combination with one to two NRTIs was as efficient as PI/r in individuals with pre-existing NRTI mutations in this setting. It may be considered an alternative to PI/r-based ART even in the presence of NRTI resistance.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Background Data on the efficacy, safety, and concomitant use with other drugs of the combination ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir (PrOD) in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients in real life are limited. The objectives of this study were to analyze these topics in HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects bearing HCV genotype 1 (GT1). Methods One hundred and eighty-two HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with GT1 (87 1a, 71 1b, 23 other) treated with PrOD, plus ribavirin (RBV) in 119 cases, in routine clinical practice were analyzed. The main variable of efficacy was sustained virological response (SVR) 12 weeks after completing therapy in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and that of safety treatment discontinuation because of adverse effects. Factors associated with SVR were analyzed with a modified ITT (mITT) strategy. Results One hundred and seventy-two (94%) patients attained SVR, 3 (2%) experienced a relapse and two (1%) discontinued therapy due to adverse events. The rates of SVR in subjects with GT 1a and 1b by mITT were, respectively, 97% and 98%. Sixty-five (98%) out of 66 patients with cirrhosis and 107 (98%) out of 110 (p = 1) non-cirrhotics achieved SVR. Fifty-five (95%) patients on concomitant darunavir therapy developed SVR vs. 117 (99%) (p = 0.105) of those without DRV. RBV dose was reduced in 13 (11%) patients and permanently discontinued in 2 (2%), with no impact on SVR. Conclusions PrOD is highly effective and well tolerated in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with GT1 in routine clinical practice. RBV is often required. However, RBV dose reduction or discontinuation is uncommonly needed and do not impair the SVR rate.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

Sparing of antiretroviral drug classes could reduce the toxicity and cost of maintenance treatment for HIV infection.. To evaluate the non-inferiority of efficacy and the safety of lopinavir/ritonavir (r) monotherapy versus a single-tablet regimen of efavirenz, emtricitabine and tenofovir (EFV/FTC/TDF) over 2 years.. Adults on stable ART with plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load <50 copies/mL for the past 12 months and no documented treatment failure were randomized to receive either lopinavir/r or EFV/FTC/TDF for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without treatment failure at week 96 (viral load <50 copies/mL at week 96, confirmed at week 98), without study treatment discontinuation, a new AIDS-defining illness, or death.. In the ITT analysis, the primary endpoint was reached by, respectively, 64% and 71% of patients in the lopinavir/r (n = 98) and EFV/FTC/TDF arms (n = 97), yielding a difference of -6.8% (lower limit of the 95% two-sided CI: -19.9%). Sanger and UltraDeep sequencing showed the occurrence of PI mutations in the lopinavir/r arm (n = 4) and of NNRTI and/or NRTI mutations in the EFV/FTC/TDF arm (n = 2). No unexpected serious clinical events occurred.. Lopinavir/r monotherapy cannot be considered non-inferior to EFV/FTC/TDF. PI resistance rarely emerged in the lopinavir/r arm and did not undermine future PI options. Two years of lopinavir/r monotherapy had no deleterious clinical impact when compared with EFV/FTC/TDF.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Female; France; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Hospitals, University; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

Doravirine is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) with a pharmacokinetic profile supporting once-daily dosing, and potent in-vitro activity against the most common NNRTI-resistant HIV-1 variants. We compared doravirine with ritonavir-boosted darunavir, when both were given with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), in adults with previously untreated HIV-1 infection.. In this randomised, controlled, double-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial, adults with HIV-1 infection were screened and enrolled at 125 clinical centres in 15 countries. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) were naive to antiretroviral therapy with plasma HIV-1 RNA of at least 1000 copies per mL at screening. Participants who had previously been treated for a viral infection other than HIV-1, those taking immunosuppressive drugs, and individuals with active acute hepatitis were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice and web response system to receive oral doravirine 100 mg or darunavir 800 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg once daily, with two investigator-selected NRTIs (tenofovir and emtricitabine or abacavir and lamivudine) for up to 96 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by HIV-1 RNA measurements at screening (≤100 000 vs >100 000 copies per mL) and the NRTI pair. Study participants, funding institution staff, investigators, and study site personnel were masked to treatment group assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants achieving HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL at week 48 defined by the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm, with non-inferiority established if the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference (doravirine minus darunavir) was greater than -10 percentage points. All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the primary efficacy and safety analyses. This trial is active, but not recruiting, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02275780.. Between Dec 1, 2014, and Oct 20, 2015, 1027 participants were screened for eligibility, of whom 769 participants were randomly assigned to treatment (385 with doravirine and 384 with ritonavir-boosted darunavir). 56 participants discontinued treatment in the doravirine group compared with 71 in the darunavir group, mostly due to loss to follow-up. 383 participants who received doravirine and 383 who received darunavir were included in the primary efficacy analyses. At week 48, 321 (84%) participants in the doravirine group and 306 (80%) in the darunavir group achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL (difference 3·9%, 95% CI -1·6 to 9·4), indicating non-inferiority of the doravirine regimen. The most common study drug-related adverse events were diarrhoea (21 [5%] of 383 participants in the doravirine group and 49 [13%] of 383 participants in the darunavir group), nausea (25 [7%] vs 29 [8%]), and headache (23 [6%] vs ten [3%]). 18 participants (six [2%] of 383 participants in the doravirine group vs 12 [3%] of 383 participants in the darunavir group) discontinued treatment due to adverse events, which were considered drug-related in four (1%) participants in the doravirine group and 8 (2%) participants in the darunavir group. Serious adverse events occurred in 19 (5%) of 383 participants in the doravirine group and 23 (6%) of 383 in the darunavir roup, and were considered study-drug related in one (<1%) participant of each group.. In treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection, doravirine combined with two NRTIs might offer a valuable treatment option for adults with previously untreated HIV-1 infection.. Merck & Co.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Viral Load

In this study, we evaluated the relationships between immune activation, bone turnover, and bone mass in virally suppressed HIV-infected children and HIV-uninfected children in South Africa. We found that decreased bone mass may occur or persist independent of immune activation and altered bone turnover.. HIV-infected children and adolescents have deficits in skeletal growth which include decreases in bone mass and alterations in bone microarchitecture. However, the mechanism by which HIV infection compromises bone accrual in children and adolescents is unclear. The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationships between immune activation, bone turnover, and bone mass in a group of pre-pubertal HIV-infected children randomized to remain on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) or switch to efavirenz-based ART in South Africa virally suppressed at the time of this study.. This cross-sectional analysis included 219 HIV-infected and 180 HIV-uninfected children enrolled in the CHANGES Bone Study conducted in Johannesburg, South Africa. Whole body (WB) bone mineral content (BMC) was assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry and WB BMC Z-scores adjusted for sex, age, and height were generated. Bone turnover markers, including C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTx) and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), were analyzed. Markers of immune activation were also measured, including cytokines IL-6 and TNF-alpha, as well as soluble CD14 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP).. Compared to uninfected controls, HIV-infected children had lower WB BMC Z-scores, similar IL-6 and TNF-alpha, higher soluble CD14 and high-sensitivity CRP, and lower markers of bone resorption (CTX) and bone formation (P1NP). Bone turnover markers were not different in those remaining on LPV/r or switched to efavirenz.. Our findings suggest that in HIV-infected children with viral suppression, decreased bone accrual may occur or persist independent of immune activation and altered bone turnover.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Bone Density; Bone Remodeling; Child; Child, Preschool; Collagen Type I; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Peptides; Ritonavir; South Africa

Background Late-presenting pregnant women pose a challenge in the prevention of HIV-1 mother-to-child-transmission. We compared the safety and efficacy of raltegravir and lopinavir/ritonavir for this population. Methods We did a single-center, pilot, open-label, randomized trial in Brazil (N = 44). We randomly allocated late-presenting HIV-infected pregnant women (older than 18 years with a plasma HIV-1 RNA >1000 copies/mL) to receive raltegravir 400 mg twice a day or lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice a day plus zidovudine and lamivudine (1:1). The primary endpoint was virological suppression at delivery (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL), in all patients who received at least one dose of study drugs (modified intention-to-treat analysis). Missing information was treated as failure. We assessed safety in all patients. Results We enrolled and randomly assigned treatment to 33 patients (17 in raltegravir group) between June 2015 and June 2017. The study was interrupted by the IRB because a significant difference between arms was detected in an interim analysis. All patients completed follow up at delivery. At delivery, virological suppression was achieved by 13/17 (76.5%) of patients in raltegravir group, versus 4/16 (25.0%) in lopinavir/ritonavir group (RR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.3-7.4). Patients in raltegravir group had significantly higher proportion of virological suppression at 2, 4, and 6 weeks than lopinavir/ritonavir group. Adverse events were most of mild intensity, but patients in lopinavir/ritonavir group had significantly more gastrointestinal adverse events. There was neither discontinuation nor deaths in this trial. Conclusion Raltegravir might be a first-line option for treatment of HIV-infected late-presenting pregnant women.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Brazil; Drug Combinations; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lopinavir; Pilot Projects; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

The QoLKAMON study evaluated quality of life, efficacy and treatment safety in HIV patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir in monotherapy (MT) versus continuing combined antiretroviral triple treatment with a boosted protease inhibitor (TT).. This was a 24-week, open-label, multicentre study in virologically-suppressed HIV-infected participants (N = 225) with a 2:1 randomization: 146 patients who switched to MT were compared with 79 patients who remained on a TT regimen. The primary endpoint was change in patient-reported outcomes in quality of life as measured by the MOS-HIV and EQ-5D questionnaires. Secondary endpoints included treatment adherence, patient satisfaction, incidence of adverse events and differences in plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) and CD4 cell counts.. Baseline quality of life, measured with the MOS-HIV score, was very good (overall score of 83 ± 10.5 in the MT arm and 82.3 ± 11.3 in the TT arm) and suffered no change during the study in any of the arms (at week 24, 83.5 ± 12.2 in MT arm and 81.9 ± 12.7 in TT arm), without statistically significant differences when compared. In regards to adherence to therapy and patient satisfaction, some aspects (number of doses forgotten in the last week and satisfaction of treatment measured with the CESTA score, dimension 1) improved significantly with MT. There were also no differences in the incidence and severity of adverse events, even though 22.8% of those in the MT arm switched their treatment when they were included in the study. Moreover, there was also no significant difference between the immunological and virological evolution of MT and TT. In the MT arm, the VL was always undetectable in 83% of patients (vs 90.7% in the TT arm) and there were only 6.7% of virological failures with VL > 50 copies/mL (vs 2.3% in the TT arm), without resistance mutations and with resuppression of VL after switching back to TT.. In a new clinical trial, monotherapy as a treatment simplification strategy in HIV-1 infected patients with sustained viral suppression has demonstrated quality of life, safety and efficacy profiles comparable to those of conventional triple therapy regimens.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Reproducibility of Results; Ritonavir; Spain; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

To investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of a treatment switch to dual ART with atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine versus continuing a standard regimen with atazanavir/ritonavir + 2NRTI in virologically suppressed patients.. ATLAS-M is a 96 week open-label, randomized, non-inferiority (margin -12%) trial enrolling HIV-infected adults on atazanavir/ritonavir + 2NRTI, with stable HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL and CD4 counts >200 cells/mm3. At baseline, patients were randomized 1:1 to switch to atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine or to continue the previous regimen. Here, we report the 96 week efficacy and safety data. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01599364.. Overall, 266 subjects were enrolled (133 in each arm). At 96 weeks, in the ITT population, patients free of treatment failure totalled 103 (77.4%) with atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine and 87 (65.4%) with triple therapy (difference +12.0%, 95% CI +1.2/+22.8, P = 0.030), demonstrating the superiority of dual therapy. Two (1.5%) and 9 (6.8%) virological failures occurred in the dual-therapy arm and the triple-therapy arm, respectively, without development of resistance to any study drug. Clinical adverse events occurred at similar rates in both arms. A higher frequency of grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia (66.9% versus 50.4%, P = 0.006) and hypertriglyceridaemia (6.8% versus 1.5%, P = 0.031) occurred with dual therapy, although this never led to treatment discontinuation. A significant improvement in renal function and lumbar spine bone mineral density occurred in the dual-therapy arm. The evolution of CD4, HIV-DNA levels and neurocognitive performance was similar in both arms.. In this randomized study, a treatment switch to atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine was superior over the continuation of atazanavir/ritonavir + 2NRTI in virologically suppressed patients, with a sustained benefit in terms of improved renal function and bone mineral density.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The aim of this study was to compare the differential effects of first-line efavirenz (EFV)-based vs. boosted lopinavir-based antiretroviral regimens on cholesterol metabolism.. Multicentre, open-label, randomized clinical trial.. Forty-nine naive HIV-infected patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive either ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) or EFV both in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00759070). Lipid profile and serum phytosterols and cholesterol precursors were determined at baseline and after 16 weeks.. After 16 weeks of intervention, total and non-HDL cholesterol as well as triglyceride levels significantly increased in the LPV/r-group (+1.0 ± 0.8; +0.8 ± 0.7 and +0.8 ± 1.5 mmol/l, respectively), but not in the EFV-group (+0.4 ± 0.7; +0.4 ± 0.6 and 0.2 ± 0.5 mmol/l, respectively). Markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol-to-cholesterol and sitosterol-to-cholesterol ratios) significantly increased in the LPV/r-group, but not in the EFV-group, whereas there were no changes in either group of the lathosterol-to-cholesterol ratio, a marker of cholesterol synthesis.. Treatment with an LPV/r-based therapy increased total cholesterol relative to EFV-based therapy. Our data suggest that absorption rather than synthesis is the mechanism involved in LPV/r-associated increased total cholesterol.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Blood Chemical Analysis; Cholesterol; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Young Adult

The clinical efficacies of some antiretroviral drugs are known to not depend on its concentration in blood. To establish a method of dosage adjustment for darunavir (DRV) based on pharmacokinetic theory, we analyzed the correlation between DRV levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and plasma.. The concentrations of DRV and ritonavir (RTV) in plasma and PBMCs of 31 samples obtained from 19 patients were analyzed. An in vitro kinetic study using MOLT-4 cells was performed to assess the contribution of RTV to the intracellular accumulation of DRV.. DRV levels in PBMCs varied between 7.91 and 29.36 ng/10. We found a poor correlation between intracellular DRV and plasma DRV levels in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. The efflux rate of DRV from cells was slow; therefore, the concentration of DRV in PBMCs may reflect average exposure to the drug and clinical efficacy.

Topics: Cell Line, Tumor; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir

Using 3 randomized Protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy studies: Kalesolo, Dream and Monoi, we performed a pooled-analysis. Our objective was to determine in PI monotherapy and standard tritherapy: 1) distribution of ultrasensitive viral load (USVL) at week 96 (W96); 2) factors associated with virological failure (VF) at W96 and 3) factors associated with USVL<1 copy at W96.. VF was defined as 2 consecutive measurements of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA viral load>50 copies/mL and analysed in Intention-To-Treat. A logistic model was used to investigate which variables were predictive of a VF and Fisher test to investigate differences in USVL at W96.. Among 609 patients, 73% were male with median age of 44.4 years (IQR 39.8-52.1), baseline CD4/CD8 ratio was 0.8 (IQR 0.6-1.10), baseline CD4 was 564.5/mm3 (IQR 422-707) and 59% presented a baseline USVL<1 copy/mL. At W96, the proportion of USVL<1 copy/mL was significantly different between PI monotherapy and standard tritherapy in pooled-analysis (65% versus 74%; p=0.04). Overall, baseline USVL<1copy/mL, tritherapy and to be a female were associated with USVL<1 copy/mL at W96 (p<0.0001, p=0.049 and p=0.006). In PI monotherapy receiving DRV/r was associated with USVL<1 copy/mL at W96 (p=0.003). Factors associated to virological succes at W96 were higher baseline CD4 (p=0.034) and baseline USVL<1 copy/mL (p=0.0005).. Pooled-analysis of 3 PI monotherapy trials showed better efficacy of tritherapy in terms of USVL at W96. Furthermore regarding USVL at W96, to receive LPV/r seems to be more deleterious than DRV/r. Baseline USVL impacts VF at W96 more specifically in tritherapy arm.. NCT00421551, NCT00946595, and NCT00140751.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

Biomarkers of systemic inflammation predict non-AIDS events and overall mortality in virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients.. To determine whether switching to a dual antiretroviral maintenance therapy was associated with modification of biomarkers of systemic inflammation as compared with continuation of successful standard triple therapy.. In this substudy of the randomized ATLAS-M trial, we compared in virologically suppressed patients the impact at 1 year of simplification to a dual therapy with atazanavir/ritonavir plus lamivudine versus maintaining atazanavir/ritonavir plus two NRTI triple therapy on markers of systemic inflammation. Plasma levels of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), soluble CD14 (sCD14) and D-dimer were quantified by ELISA at baseline and at 48 weeks.. A subset of 139 of 266 randomized patients with available samples was analysed: 69 in the triple therapy arm and 70 in the dual therapy arm. The baseline biomarker levels were comparable between randomization arms. No significant differences in changes from baseline to week 48 were observed between arms (dual therapy versus triple therapy): IL-6, -0.030 versus -0.016 log10 pg/L; CRP, +0.022 versus +0.027 log10 pg/mL; sCD14, -0.016 versus +0.019 log10 pg/mL; and D-dimer, -0.031 versus +0.004 log10 pg/mL. A history of cancer was associated with higher baseline levels of IL-6 (P = 0.002) and CRP (P = 0.049). No relationship was observed between baseline biomarker level and persistent residual viraemia, HIV-1 DNA load, plasma lipids and other potential explanatory variables.. Simplification with atazanavir/ritonavir plus lamivudine does not affect plasma markers of systemic inflammation in virologically suppressed patients. The association between these findings and clinical outcomes requires further evaluation.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Biomarkers; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Inflammation; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

To assess whether low-dose ritonavir-boosted darunavir (darunavir/r) in combination with two NRTIs could maintain virological suppression in patients on a standard regimen of darunavir/r + two NRTIs.. A multicentre, Phase II, non-comparative, single-arm, open-label study.. Tertiary care hospitals in France.. One hundred HIV-1-infected adults with no darunavir or NRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) and a plasma HIV RNA level ≤50 copies/mL for ≥12 months on once-daily darunavir/r (800/100 mg) + two NRTIs for ≥6 months were switched to darunavir/r 400/100 mg with the same NRTIs.. Proportion of patients with treatment success: plasma HIV RNA level ≤50  copies/mL up to 48 weeks without any change in the study regimen, in a modified ITT (mITT) analysis.. At baseline, most patients were male (78%), with a median age of 43 years, median duration of HIV RNA ≤50 copies/mL of 35 months and median CD4 T cell count of 633 cells/mm3. Seventy-six percent received tenofovir/emtricitabine and 24% abacavir/lamivudine. Five patients were excluded from the mITT analysis. The rate of treatment success through to week 48 was 91.6% (87/95; 95% CI 84.1%-96.3%). No RAM was detected in three amplifiable genotypes. A total of 212 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 64 patients (64%); 9 AEs were serious, none leading to treatment discontinuation.. In HIV-infected patients well suppressed with darunavir/r (800/100 mg) and two NRTIs, a reduction of the darunavir dose to 400 mg/day maintained virological efficacy and was safe over 48 weeks.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Concerns have been voiced over the capacity of deintensification strategies to preserve neurocognitive function and prevent neurocognitive impairment.. We present the 96 week results of a neurocognitive substudy nested within the SALT clinical trial: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial that compares whether atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine is non-inferior to atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs in HIV-suppressed patients on stable triple therapy. A global deficit score (GDS) for five neurocognitive tasks was used to assess neurocognitive function. Changes in neurocognitive function (GDS value) were determined at weeks 48 and 96. The effect of atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine, adjusted for significant confounders, on the change in neurocognitive function was determined using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) at week 96.. The per-protocol analysis included 92 participants (47 atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine and 45 atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs). All baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. At weeks 48 and 96, changes in GDS [week 48, atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine -0.3 (95% CI -0.5 to -0.1) versus atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs -0.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 0.0), P = 0.39; week 96, atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine -0.3 (95% CI -0.5 to -0.1) versus atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs -0.2 (95% CI -0.4 to -0.1); P = 0.471] were similar. This absence of differences was also observed in all cognitive tasks. Atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine did not impact the change in neurocognitive function at week 96; the adjusted effect of atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine on GDS change, considering atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs as a reference, was 0.01 (95% CI -0.18 to 0.21) (P = 0.90).. Neurocognitive function remained stable after 96 weeks, both in the atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine and in the atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arms, provided HIV remained suppressed.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Neurocognitive Disorders; Ritonavir

In the ANRS 165 DARULIGHT study (NCT02384967) carried out in HIV-infected patients, the use of a darunavir/ritonavir-containing regimen with a switch to a reduced dose of darunavir maintained virological efficacy (≤50 copies/mL) for 48 weeks with a good safety profile.. To assess the total and unbound blood plasma pharmacokinetics of darunavir and associated antiretrovirals, and their penetration into semen before and after dose reduction.. Patients receiving a darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg q24h)-containing regimen for >6 months with plasma HIV-RNA ≤50 copies/mL for >12 months were switched to 400/100 mg darunavir/ritonavir q24h at week 0. A 24 h intensive pharmacokinetic blood sampling and a trough seminal sampling were performed before (week 0) and after (week 12) dose reduction. Individual pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were obtained using non-linear mixed-effect modelling for darunavir/ritonavir in blood plasma and used to test for bioequivalence, whereas darunavir/ritonavir in seminal plasma and NRTIs were analysed using a non-compartmental approach.. Fifteen patients completed the intensive pharmacokinetic analysis. There was no significant decrease in total and unbound darunavir blood plasma exposure despite a 50% decrease in darunavir daily dose from 800 to 400 mg (AUC0-24 = 65 563 versus 52 518 ng·h/mL; P = 0.25). A decrease in apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of both darunavir and ritonavir at week 12 suggests a modification of the initial darunavir/ritonavir daily dose balance (800/100 to 400/100 mg), in favour of a reduced inducer effect of darunavir on cytochrome P450 and efflux transporters compared with the standard dose.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Plasma; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Semen; Therapeutic Equivalency

Ninety-six-week costs for antiretroviral drugs, adverse event management, and HIV care for individuals initiating RAL, ATV/r, or DRV/r as first-line therapy for HIV-1 infection were estimated using an economic model. Efficacy and safety data (mean CD4 cell count changes, discontinuation rates, grade 3/4 adverse event incidence) for each regimen through 96 weeks of treatment were taken from the ACTG 5257 clinical trial. Antiretroviral drug costs for each initial regimen and for each substitution regimen, as used by individuals who discontinued their initial regimen, were based on wholesale acquisition costs. Adverse event management costs and HIV care costs, stratified by CD4 cell count range, were taken from published sources and inflated to 2016 dollars. Scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Cost outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3.0%.. Total 96-week costs were $81,231 for RAL, $88,064 for ATV/r, and $87,680 for DRV/r, where differences were primarily due to lower antiretroviral drug costs for RAL than for ATV/r or DRV/r. These results were found to be robust in scenario and sensitivity analyses.. Relative to the DRV/r and ATV/r regimens, the RAL regimen had the lowest cost for treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection in the United States.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Health Care Costs; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Models, Economic; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; United States

The AtLaS-M randomized trial showed that in patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL on atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs, switching to a dual therapy with atazanavir/ritonavir+lamivudine had superior efficacy as compared with continuing the previous triple therapy. This substudy was designed to evaluate at 48 weeks the impact of the dual therapy versus the three-drug atazanavir/ritonavir-based therapy on the HIV-1 cellular reservoir as reflected by the quantification of blood-associated HIV-1 DNA levels.. In a representative subset of 201 of 266 randomized patients (104 in the dual-therapy arm and 97 in the triple-therapy arm) total HIV-1 DNA levels in whole blood at baseline and after 48 weeks and factors associated with the HIV-1 DNA levels were evaluated.. The mean baseline HIV-1 DNA levels (2.47 log 10 copies/10 6 leucocytes) were comparable between arms. A significant mean decrease between baseline and week 48 was observed: -0.069 log 10 copies/10 6 leucocytes in the dual-therapy arm ( P  =   0.046) and -0.078 in the triple-therapy arm ( P  =   0.011); the mean difference between arms was -0.009 ( P  =   0.842). Nadir CD4 count was inversely correlated with baseline HIV-1 DNA ( P  =   0.009); longer duration of ART and lower nadir CD4 correlated with a less prominent HIV-1 DNA decrease (both P  <   0.005). Higher baseline HIV-1 DNA was associated with residual viraemia at week 48 ( P  =   0.031).. When compared with continuing three-drug therapy, atazanavir/ritonavir+lamivudine dual therapy resulted in a similar decline in HIV-1 DNA levels in patients with sustained virological suppression. These data support the safety of this simplified treatment strategy in terms of its effect on the cellular HIV-1 reservoir.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; DNA, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

Improving access to paediatric HIV treatment requires both large-scale treatment programmes and medication that is adapted to infants and children's needs. The WHO recommends lopinavir/ritonavir as first-line antiretroviral therapy for all HIV-infected children younger than 3 years. There is currently little evidence on the acceptability of, and adherence to, a formulation of this combination treatment if given in the form of pellets. This protocol presents how we will carry a realist evaluation to assess the factors that contribute to the acceptability and adherence to the new pellets formulation in 3 hospitals in Kenya.. We structured the protocol along the realist evaluation cycle following 4 steps: (1) the initial programme theory, (2) the study design, (3) the data collection methods and (4) the data analysis plan. Theories of behavioural sciences were reviewed for frames that could provide insights into how using such new formulations may contribute to better acceptability and adherence.. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Tropical Medicine, the Ethical Committee of the University Hospital Antwerp and the Kenyatta National Hospital/University of Nairobi Ethics and Research Committee. We aim to disseminate the findings through international conferences and peer-reviewed journals and to share them with Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative's (DNDi) programme managers and with the Kenyan healthcare providers.. In developing this study, we encountered some challenges. First, methods to measure the acceptability of any formulation and adherence to it are not standardised. The second challenge is common in realist evaluation and relates to how to choose from different potentially interesting theoretical frameworks. We identified relevant and empirically tested theories from behavioural science that may be helpful in our study. We will test them in 3 settings by exploring the multilevel factors that influence acceptability and adherence of this new paediatric Antiretroviral (ARV) formulation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-HIV Agents; Caregivers; Child; Culture; Data Collection; Delivery of Health Care; Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; Humans; Kenya; Lopinavir; Medication Adherence; Patient Satisfaction; Ritonavir; Socioeconomic Factors; Tablets

GSK3532795 is a second-generation human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) maturation inhibitor that targets HIV-1 Gag, inhibiting the final protease cleavage between capsid protein p24 and spacer protein-1, producing immature, noninfectious virions.. This was a phase 2a, randomized, dose-ranging multipart trial. In part A, subtype B-infected subjects received 5-120 mg GSK3532795 (or placebo) once daily for 10 days. In part B, subtype B-infected subjects received 40 mg or 80 mg GSK3532795 once daily with atazanavir (ATV) with or without (±) ritonavir (RTV) or standard of care (SOC) (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and ATV/RTV 300 mg/100 mg) for 28 days. In part C, subtype C-infected subjects received 40 mg or 120 mg GSK3532795 once daily (or placebo) for 10 days. Endpoints included change in HIV-1 RNA from baseline on day 11 (parts A/C) or day 29 (part B).. A >1 log10 median decline in HIV-1 RNA was achieved by day 11 in parts A and C and day 29 in part B at GSK3532795 doses ≥40 mg; part B subjects receiving GSK3532795 and ATV ± RTV achieved similar declines to those receiving SOC. Median of the maximum declines in HIV-1 RNA were similar for the 40-120 mg once-daily dose groups regardless of baseline Gag polymorphisms. There were no deaths, adverse events leading to discontinuation, or serious adverse events.. GSK3532795 demonstrated potent antiviral activity against subtype B (monotherapy or with ATV ± RTV) and subtype C, and was generally well tolerated, which supported continued development of GSK3532795 in subjects with HIV-1 subtype B or subtype C.. NCT01803074.

Topics: Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Young Adult

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV is often poorly tolerated and not completed. Alternative PEP regimens may improve adherence and completion, aiding HIV prevention. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a maraviroc-based PEP regimen compared with a standard-of-care regimen using ritonavir-boosted lopinavir.. Patients meeting criteria for PEP were randomized to tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine (200/245 mg) once daily plus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (Kaletra ® 400/100 mg) or maraviroc 300 mg twice daily. The composite primary endpoint was completion of 28 days of the allocated PEP regimen without grade 3 or 4 clinical or laboratory adverse events (AEs) related to the PEP medication.. Two hundred and thirteen individuals were randomized (107 to maraviroc; 106 to Kaletra ® arm). Follow-up rates were high in both groups. There was no difference in the primary endpoint; 70 (71%) in the maraviroc and 64 (65%) in the Kaletra ® arm ( P  =   0.36) completed PEP without grade 3 or 4 AEs. Discontinuation of PEP was the same (18%) in both groups. There were no grade 3 or 4 clinical AEs in either arm, but more grade 1 or 2 clinical AEs in the Kaletra ® arm (91% versus 70%; P  < 0.001). Antidiarrhoeal medication use was higher in the Kaletra ® arm (67% versus 25%; P  < 0.001). There were no HIV seroconversions in the study period.. The completion rate in the absence of grade 3 or 4 AEs was similar with both regimens. Maraviroc-based PEP was better tolerated, supporting its use as an option for non-occupational PEP.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclohexanes; Drug Combinations; Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Maraviroc; Medication Adherence; Post-Exposure Prophylaxis; Ritonavir; Triazoles; Young Adult

We previously demonstrated the noninferiority of switching to efavirenz (EFV) versus remaining on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) for virologic control in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and exposed to nevirapine (NVP) for prevention of mother-to-child transmission. Here we assess outcomes up to 4 years post-randomization.. From 2010-2013, 298 NVP-exposed HIV-infected children ≥3 years of age were randomized to switch to EFV or remain on LPV/r in Johannesburg, South Africa (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01146873). After trial completion, participants were invited to enroll into observational follow-up. We compared HIV RNA levels, CD4 counts and percentages, lipids, and growth across groups through four years post-randomization.. HIV RNA levels 51-1000 copies/mL were less frequently observed in the EFV group than the LPV/r group (odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.88, P = .004), as was HIV RNA >1000 copies/mL (OR 0.52 95% CI: 0.28-0.98, P = .04). The probability of confirmed HIV RNA >1000 copies/mL by 48 months was 0.07 and 0.12 in the EFV and LPV/r groups, respectively (P = .21). Children randomized to EFV had a reduced risk of elevated total cholesterol (OR 0.45 95% CI: 0.27-0.75, P = .002) and a reduced risk of abnormal triglycerides (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29-0.62, P < .001).. Our results indicate that the benefits of switching virologically suppressed NVP-exposed HIV-infected children ≥3 years of age from LPV/r to EFV are sustained long-term. This approach has several advantages, including improved palatability, reduced metabolic toxicity, simplified cotreatment for tuberculosis, and preservation of second line options.. NCT01146873.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child, Preschool; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome

The 2016 World Health Organization guidelines recommend all children <3 years start antiretroviral therapy (ART) on protease inhibitor-based regimens. But lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) syrup has many challenges in low-income countries, including limited availability, requires refrigeration, interactions with anti-tuberculous drugs, twice-daily dosing, poor palatability in young children, and higher cost than non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) drugs. Successfully initiating LPV/r-based ART in HIV-infected children aged <2 years raises operational challenges that could be simplified by switching to a protease inhibitor-sparing therapy based on efavirenz (EFV), although, to date, EFV is not recommended in children <3 years.. The MONOD ANRS 12026 study is a phase 3 non-inferiority open-label randomised clinical trial conducted in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, and Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso (ClinicalTrial.gov registry: NCT01127204). HIV-1-infected children who were tuberculosis-free and treated before the age of 2 years with 12-15 months of suppressive twice-daily LPV/r-based ART (HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) <500 copies/mL, confirmed) were randomised to two arms: once-daily combination of abacavir (ABC) + lamivudine (3TC) + EFV (referred to as EFV) versus continuation of the twice-daily combination zidovudine (ZDV) or ABC + 3TC + LPV/r (referred to as LPV). The primary endpoint was the difference in the proportion of children with virological suppression by 12 months post-randomisation between arms (14% non-inferiority bound, Chi-squared test).. Between May 2011 and January 2013, 156 children (median age 13.7 months) were initiated on ART. After 12-15 months on ART, 106 (68%) were randomised to one of the two treatment arms (54 LPV, 52 EFV); 97 (91%) were aged <3 years. At 12 months post-randomisation, 46 children (85.2%) from LPV versus 43 (82.7%) from EFV showed virological suppression (defined as a VL <500 copies/mL; difference, 2.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -11.5 to 16.5), whereas seven (13%) in LPV and seven (13.5%) in EFV were classed as having virological failure (secondary outcome, defined as a VL ≥1000 copies/mL; difference, 0.5%; 95% CI, -13.4 to 12.4). No significant differences in adverse events were observed, with two adverse events in LPV (3.7%) versus four (7.7%) in EFV (p = 0.43). On genotyping, 13 out of 14 children with virological failure (six out of seven EFV, seven out of seven LPV) had a drug-resistance mutation: nine (five out of six EFV, four out of seven LPV) had one or more major NNRTI-resistance mutations whereas none had an LPV/r-resistance mutation.. At the VL threshold of 500 copies/mL, we could not conclusively demonstrate the non-inferiority of EFV on viral suppression compared to LPV because of low statistical power. However, non-inferiority was confirmed for a VL threshold of <1000 copies/mL. Resistance analyses highlighted a high frequency of NNRTI-resistance mutations. A switch to an EFV-based regimen as a simplification strategy around the age of 3 years needs to be closely monitored.. ClinicalTrial.gov registry n° NCT01127204 , 19 May 2010.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Burkina Faso; Child, Preschool; Cote d'Ivoire; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Cross-resistance after first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) failure is expected to impair activity of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in second-line therapy for patients with HIV, but evidence for the effect of cross-resistance on virological outcomes is limited. We aimed to assess the association between the activity, predicted by resistance testing, of the NRTIs used in second-line therapy and treatment outcomes for patients infected with HIV.. We did an observational analysis of additional data from a published open-label, randomised trial of second-line ART (EARNEST) in sub-Saharan Africa. 1277 adults or adolescents infected with HIV in whom first-line ART had failed (assessed by WHO criteria with virological confirmation) were randomly assigned to a boosted protease inhibitor (standardised to ritonavir-boosted lopinavir) with two to three NRTIs (clinician-selected, without resistance testing); or with raltegravir; or alone as protease inhibitor monotherapy (discontinued after week 96). We tested genotypic resistance on stored baseline samples in patients in the protease inhibitor and NRTI group and calculated the predicted activity of prescribed second-line NRTIs. We measured viral load in stored samples for all patients obtained every 12-16 weeks. This trial is registered with Controlled-Trials.com (number ISRCTN 37737787) and ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00988039).. Baseline genotypes were available in 391 (92%) of 426 patients in the protease inhibitor and NRTI group. 176 (89%) of 198 patients prescribed a protease inhibitor with no predicted-active NRTIs had viral suppression (viral load <400 copies per mL) at week 144, compared with 312 (81%) of 383 patients in the protease inhibitor and raltegravir group at week 144 (p=0·02) and 233 (61%) of 280 patients in the protease inhibitor monotherapy group at week 96 (p<0·0001). Compared with results with no active NRTIs, 95 (85%) of 112 patients with one predicted-active NRTI had viral suppression (p=0·3) and 20 (77%) of 26 patients with two or three active NRTIs had viral suppression (p=0·08). Over all follow-up, greater predicted NRTI activity was associated with worse viral load suppression (global p=0·0004).. Genotypic resistance testing might not accurately predict NRTI activity in protease inhibitor-based second-line ART. Our results do not support the introduction of routine resistance testing in ART programmes in low-income settings for the purpose of selecting second-line NRTIs.. European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, UK Medical Research Council, Institito de Salud Carlos III, Irish Aid, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Instituto Superiore di Sanita, WHO, Merck.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Africa South of the Sahara; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Public Health; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

Adequate antiretroviral exposure is crucial to virological suppression. We assessed the relationship between atazanavir hair levels with self-reported adherence, virological outcomes, and the effect of a home-based adherence intervention in HIV-infected adolescents failing second-line antiretroviral treatment in Zimbabwe.. HIV-infected adolescents on atazanavir/ritonavir-based second-line treatment for ≥6 months with viral load (VL) >1000 copies/mL were randomized to either standard care (control) or standard care plus modified directly administered antiretroviral therapy (intervention). Questionnaires were administered; VL and hair samples were collected at baseline and after 90 days in each group. Viral suppression was defined as <1000 copies/mL after follow-up.. Fifty adolescents (10-18 years) were enrolled; 23 (46%) were randomized to intervention and 27 (54%) to control. Atazanavir hair concentration <2.35 ng/mg (lower interquartile range for those with virological suppression) defined a cutoff below which most participants experienced virological failure. Male sex (P = 0.03), virological suppression at follow-up (P = 0.013), greater reduction in VL (P = 0.006), and change in average self-reported adherence over the previous month (P = 0.031) were associated with adequate (>2.35 ng/mg) hair concentrations. Participants with virological failure were more likely to have suboptimal atazanavir hair concentrations (RR = 7.2, 95% CI: 1 to 51, P = 0.049). There were no differences in atazanavir hair concentration between the arms after follow-up.. A threshold of atazanavir concentrations in hair (2.35 ng/mg), above which virological suppression was likely, was defined for adolescents failing second-line atazanavir/ritonavir-based ART in Zimbabwe. Male sex and better self-reported adherence were associated with adequate atazanavir hair concentrations. Antiretroviral hair concentrations may serve as a useful clinical tool among adolescents.

Topics: Adolescent; Adolescent Behavior; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Child; Female; Hair; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Ritonavir; Self Report; Treatment Failure; Viral Load; Zimbabwe

Cobicistat and ritonavir have different inhibitory profiles for drug transporters that could impact the distribution of co-administered drugs. We compared darunavir concentrations in CSF when boosted by cobicistat versus ritonavir relative to plasma concentrations and with WT HIV-1 IC50 and IC90.. An open, single-arm, sequential clinical trial (NCT02503462) where paired CSF and blood samples were taken from seven HIV-infected patients presenting with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) and treated with a darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) once-daily regimen. Ritonavir was subsequently replaced by cobicistat and paired CSF and blood samples were obtained from the same patients after treatment with the darunavir/cobicistat (800/150 mg) once-daily regimen. Darunavir concentrations at the end of the dosing interval were quantified by LC-MS/MS.. The median (IQR) darunavir concentrations in CSF with ritonavir and cobicistat boosting were 16.4 ng/mL (8.6-20.3) and 15.9 ng/mL (6.7-31.6), respectively (P = 0.58). The median (IQR) darunavir CSF:plasma ratios with ritonavir and cobicistat boosting were 0.007 (0.006-0.012) and 0.011 (0.007-0.015), respectively (P = 0.16). Darunavir concentrations in CSF exceeded the darunavir IC50 and IC90 by a median of 9.2- and 6.7-fold with ritonavir boosting, and by 8.9- and 6.5-fold with cobicistat boosting, respectively. All patients had darunavir CSF concentrations above the target inhibitory concentrations and remained virologically suppressed in the CSF and plasma.. This small study shows that cobicistat and ritonavir give comparable effective darunavir concentrations in CSF, thus suggesting that these boosters can be used interchangeably in once-daily darunavir regimens.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Cobicistat; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Darunavir; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Piperazines; Plasma; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome

HIV-infected individuals, even well controlled with combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), have systemic inflammation and comorbidities. Substance P (SP) is an undecapeptide, which mediates neurotransmission and inflammation through its cognate neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R). Plasma SP levels are elevated in HIV-infected individuals. The FDA-approved antiemetic aprepitant, an NK1R antagonist, has anti-HIV effects and antiinflammatory actions. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiinflammatory properties of aprepitant in HIV-positive individuals receiving cART.. We conducted a phase 1B study of 12 HIV-positive individuals on a ritonavir-containing regimen (HIV viral load less than 40 copies/ml and CD4 > 400 cells/μl). Participants received open-label aprepitant 375 mg per day for 28 days and were followed for an additional 30 days. Changes in plasma levels of proinflammatory markers were assessed using flow cytometry, ELISA, luminex, and SOMAscan assays.. The mean peak aprepitant plasma concentration was 30.7 ± 15.3 μg/ml at day 14 and 23.3 ± 12.3 μg/ml at day 28. Aprepitant treatment resulted in decreased plasma SP levels and affected 176 plasma proteins (56 after FDR) and several metabolic pathways, including inflammation and lipid metabolism. No change in soluble CD163 was observed. Aprepitant treatment was associated with a moderate increases in total and HDL cholesterol and affected select hematologic and metabolic markers, which returned to baseline levels 30 days after aprepitant treatment was stopped. There were 12 mild and 10 moderate adverse events (AE).. Aprepitant is safe and well tolerated. The antiinflammatory properties of aprepitant make it a possible adjunctive therapy for comorbid conditions associated with HIV infection.. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02154360).. This research was funded by NIH UO1 MH090325, P30 MH097488, and PO1 MH105303.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Aprepitant; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Viral Load

Our objective was to assess the therapeutic noninferiority of dual therapy with darunavir/ritonavir and lamivudine compared to triple therapy with darunavir/ritonavir plus 2 nucleos(t)ides for maintenance of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) suppression.. This was a multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial (margin 12%). Patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for 6 months or longer on triple therapy with darunavir/ritonavir and 2 nucleos(t)ides (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine or abacavir and lamivudine) and with no resistance were randomized to continue therapy (n = 128) or switch to darunavir/ritonavir and lamivudine (n = 129). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL after 48 weeks of follow-up according to the snapshot algorithm.. A total of 249 participants received study drugs (intention-to-treat exposed). The proportion of participants with HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL in the dual- and triple-therapy arms was 88.9% (112/126) and 92.7% (114/123; difference, -3.8%; 95% confidence interval, -11.0 to 3.4), respectively. Four participants in the dual-therapy arm and 2 in the triple-therapy arm developed protocol-defined virological failure. Switching to dual therapy was associated with a significant increase in total, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, but not in the total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio. Serious adverse events and study drug discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 4.8% vs 4.9%P = .97) and in 0.8% (1/126) vs 1.6% P = .55) in dual therapy vs triple therapy, respectively.. Dual therapy with darunavir/ritonavir and lamivudine demonstrated noninferior therapeutic efficacy and similar tolerability compared to triple therapy.. NCT02159599.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Dideoxynucleosides; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Medication Therapy Management; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Viral Load

To assess HIV-1 post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) non-completion at day 28, comparing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir versus cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir as a single-tablet regimen (STR), using tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine with both of these therapies.. A prospective, open, randomized clinical trial was performed. Individuals attending the emergency room due to potential sexual exposure to HIV and who met criteria for PEP were randomized 1:3 into two groups receiving either 400/100 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 38) or 150/150 mg of elvitegravir/cobicistat (n = 119), with both groups also receiving 245/200 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine. Five follow-up visits were scheduled at days 1, 10, 28, 90 and 180. The primary endpoint was PEP non-completion at day 28. Secondary endpoints were adherence, adverse effects and rate of seroconversions. Clinical trials.gov number: NCT08431173.. Median age was 32 years and 95% were males. PEP non-completion at day 28 was 36% (n = 57), with a trend to be higher in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm [lopinavir/ritonavir 47% (n = 18) versus elvitegravir/cobicistat 33% (n = 39), P = 0.10]. We performed a modified ITT analysis including only those patients who attended on day 1. PEP non-completion in this subgroup was higher in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm than in the elvitegravir/cobicistat arm (33% versus 15%, respectively, P = 0.04). Poor adherence was significantly higher in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm versus the elvitegravir/cobicistat arm (47% versus 9%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Adverse events were reported by 73 patients (59%), and were significantly more common in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm (90% versus 49%, P = 0.0001). A seroconversion was observed in the elvitegravir/cobicistat arm in a patient with multiple exposures before and after PEP.. A higher PEP non-completion, poor adherence and adverse events were observed in patients allocated to the lopinavir/ritonavir arm, suggesting that STR elvitegravir/cobicistat is a well-tolerated antiretroviral for PEP.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Cobicistat; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Medication Adherence; Post-Exposure Prophylaxis; Prospective Studies; Quinolones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tablets; Tenofovir

As a simplification strategy for treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients who have achieved virologic suppression on a multi-drug, multi-class antiretroviral regimen, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of once-daily elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) with darunavir.. A single arm, open-label 48-week study was conducted of regimen simplification to E/C/F/TDF plus darunavir 800 mg daily from stable therapy including two nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, and an integrase inhibitor. Participants had plasma HIV viral load consistently < 200 copies/mL for ≥ 6 months, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min, and no genotypic resistance to major components of the study regimen. Plasma viral load was measured at weeks 2 and 4, then every 4 weeks throughout the study. Safety laboratory assessments were conducted at baseline and at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48. Antiretroviral drug concentrations were measured at baseline and once ≥ 2 weeks after the regimen change.. Ten HIV-infected adults (8 male and 2 female; median age 50.5 years) were enrolled. All maintained virologic suppression on the new regimen for 48 weeks. One subject experienced a decrease in eGFR from 62 mL/min at baseline to 52 mL/min at week 12; study medications were continued and his eGFR remained stable (50-59 mL/min) thereafter. No subjects discontinued study medications for renal function changes or other adverse events. Darunavir trough concentration were lower on the new regimen than on darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg (n = 5; p < 0.05).. Despite low darunavir trough concentrations, treatment simplification to a two-pill, once-daily regimen of E/C/F/TDF plus darunavir was safe and effective for 48 weeks among 10 selected treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients. Trial registration The study protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02199613) on July 22, 2014.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Cobicistat; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Integrase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Protease Inhibitors; Quinolones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Viral Load

To compare the efficacy, safety, and impact on lipid fractions of switching from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) to a dolutegravir (DTG) regimen.. HIV type 1-infected adults more than 50 years or with a Framingham score more than 10% were eligible if plasma HIV RNA less than 50 copies per ml for at least 24 weeks while on a PI/r regimen. Patients were randomized to switch to DTG or to remain on PI/r. Primary endpoints were: proportion maintaining HIV RNA less than 50 copies per ml and percentage change from baseline of total cholesterol at week 48.. In total, 415 patients (32 sites in six European countries) were randomized: 205 to DTG and 210 to continue PI/r. About 89% were men, 87% more than 50 years, 74% had a Framingham score more than 10%, with a median CD4 cell count of 617 cells per μl and suppressed viremia for a median of 5 years. At week 48, in the intent-to-treat analysis, treatment success rate was 93.1% in DTG group and 95.2% in PI/r group (difference -2.1%, 95% confidence interval -6.6 to 2.4, noninferiority demonstrated). There were four virological failures with DTG and one with PI/r with no emergent resistance mutations. There was no significant difference in severe adverse events or grade 3 or 4 adverse events or treatment modifying adverse events. Total cholesterol and other lipid fractions (except high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) improved significantly (P < 0.001) in the DTG group regardless of PI/r at baseline.. Switching to a DTG regimen in virologically suppressed HIV type 1 patients with high cardiovascular disease risk was noninferior, and significantly improved lipid profiles.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Substitution; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Male; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Ritonavir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome

Primary study outcome was absence of treatment failure (virological failure, VF, or treatment interruption) per protocol at week 48.. Patients on 3-drug ART with stable HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL and CCR5-tropic virus were randomized 1:1 to maraviroc with darunavir/ritonavir qd (study arm) or continue current ART (continuation arm).. In June 2015, 115 patients were evaluable for the primary outcome (56 study, 59 continuation arm). The study was discontinued due to excess of VF in the study arm (7 cases, 12.5%, vs 0 in the continuation arm, p = 0.005). The proportion free of treatment failure was 73.2% in the study and 59.3% in the continuation arm. Two participants in the study and 10 in the continuation arm discontinued therapy due to adverse events (p = 0.030). At VF, no emergent drug resistance was detected. Co-receptor tropism switched to non-R5 in one patient. Patients with VF reported lower adherence and had lower plasma drug levels. Femoral bone mineral density was significantly improved in the study arm.. Switching to maraviroc with darunavir/ritonavir qd in virologically suppressed patients was associated with improved tolerability but was virologically inferior to 3-drug therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Cyclohexanes; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Maraviroc; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Viral Load

Data on the combination of darunavir/ritonavir and etravirine both given twice daily in adolescents/young adults are lacking. In this study, we assessed the pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg with etravirine 200 mg twice daily in 36 treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus-infected adolescents and young adults and found that exposures were comparable to those reported in adults.

Topics: Adolescent; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Viral Load; Young Adult

The role of oxidized lipoproteins (high-density [HDLox] and low-density [LDLox]) and total lipoprotein particle (Lp) number and size in HIV-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) is unclear. The goal of this study was to evaluate changes of these biomarkers and their associations with rate of carotid intima media thickness progression over 3 years (ΔCIMT) in chronic HIV infection.. Prospective study of 234 HIV-infected antiretroviral treatment-naive participants without CVD who were randomized to receive tenofovir-emtricitabine plus atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir or raltegravir (RAL) and achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml by week 24 and thereafter. Biomarker changes over 24, 48 or 96 weeks from baseline and pairwise treatment group comparisons were examined. Associations of these biomarkers with ΔCIMT were analysed with mixed effects linear regression.. HDLp number increased with both protease inhibitors (PIs) over 48 weeks, while LDLp number declined with RAL; Lp size did not change. Over 96 weeks, normalized HDLox declined with both PIs; LDLox increased in all groups. Few treatment group differences were observed across all biomarkers. Associations between ΔCIMT and oxidized lipoproteins at all time points were not apparent (P≥0.10). There was some evidence of slower ΔCIMT for higher HDLp number (P=0.06) and for lower LDLp number (P=0.08) measured at baseline.. Unexpectedly, LDLox increased modestly in all treatment groups after ART initiation. Associations of plasma HDLox and LDLox with ΔCIMT were not apparent. While plasma levels of abnormal lipoproteins have been shown to be associated with CVD outcomes, clear associations with sub-clinical atherosclerosis progression were not apparent in our study.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Darunavir; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Linear Models; Lipoproteins, HDL; Lipoproteins, LDL; Male; Middle Aged; Oxidation-Reduction; Prospective Studies; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir

Atazanavir is boosted with the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor ritonavir. When combined with the CYP3A4 substrate daclatasvir, the daclatasvir dosage should be reduced from 60 to 30 mg once daily. Recently, cobicistat was licensed as a CYP3A booster and used with atazanavir.. To determine whether the fixed-dose combination of atazanavir/cobicistat has an influence on daclatasvir pharmacokinetics comparable to that of the separate agents atazanavir and ritonavir.. A prospective, open-label, two-period, randomized, cross-over trial was performed in 16 healthy subjects (NCT02565888). Treatment consisted of 300/100 mg of atazanavir/ritonavir plus 30 mg of daclatasvir once daily (reference) and a second period of 300/150 mg of atazanavir/cobicistat plus 30 mg of daclatasvir once daily (test). A 24 h pharmacokinetic, steady-state curve was recorded for all drugs. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% CI were calculated for daclatasvir and atazanavir AUC. All 16 healthy subjects completed the study. Median (range) age and BMI were 48.5 (21-55) years and 24.5 (19.0-29.2) kg/m. Atazanavir/cobicistat and atazanavir/ritonavir had a similar influence on daclatasvir pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Daclatasvir at 30 mg once daily is the correct dose when combined with atazanavir/cobicistat.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Cobicistat; Cross-Over Studies; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidines; Ritonavir; Valine; Young Adult

Lipoatrophy is one of the most feared complications associated with the use of nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N[t]RTIs). We aimed to assess soft-tissue changes in participants with HIV who had virological failure of a first-line antiretroviral (ART) regimen containing a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor plus two N(t)RTIs and were randomly assigned to receive a second-line regimen containing a boosted protease inhibitor given with either N(t)RTIs or raltegravir.. Of the 37 sites that participated in the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority SECOND-LINE study, eight sites from five countries (Argentina, India, Malaysia, South Africa, and Thailand) participated in the body composition substudy. All sites had a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner and all participants enrolled in SECOND-LINE were eligible for inclusion in the substudy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), via a computer-generated allocation schedule, to receive either ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus raltegravir (raltegravir group) or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus two or three N(t)RTIs (N[t]RTI group). Randomisation was stratified by site and screening HIV-1 RNA. Participants and investigators were not masked to group assignment, but allocation was concealed until after interventions were assigned. DXA scans were done at weeks 0, 48, and 96. The primary endpoint was mean percentage and absolute change in peripheral limb fat from baseline to week 96. We did intention-to-treat analyses of available data. This substudy is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01513122.. Between Aug 1, 2010, and July 10, 2011, we recruited 211 participants into the substudy. The intention-to-treat population comprised 102 participants in the N(t)RTI group and 108 participants in the raltegravir group, of whom 91 and 105 participants, respectively, reached 96 weeks. Mean percentage change in limb fat from baseline to week 96 was 16·8% (SD 32·6) in the N(t)RTI group and 28·0% (37·6) in the raltegravir group (mean difference 10·2%, 95% CI 0·1-20·4; p=0·048). Mean absolute change was 1·04 kg (SD 2·29) in the N(t)RTI group and 1·81 kg (2·50) in the raltegravir group (mean difference 0·6, 95% CI -0·1 to 1·3; p=0·10).. Our findings suggest that for people with virological failure of a first-line regimen containing efavirenz plus tenofovir and lamivudine or emtricitabine, the WHO-recommended switch to a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor plus zidovudine (a thymidine analogue nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor) and lamivudine might come at the cost of peripheral lipoatrophy. Further study could help to define specific groups of people who might benefit from a switch to an N(t)RTI-sparing second-line ART regimen.. The Kirby Institute and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Body Composition; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; International Cooperation; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Viral Load

Initiating ART during acute/recent HIV-1 infection reduces viral reservoir formation. It has been proposed that, during this phase, the size of the viral reservoir could be further reduced by the association of immunomodulatory therapy with ART. Contradictory results have emerged, however, from two trials evaluating the impact on immune recovery and the viral reservoir of adding cyclosporine A to ART during primary HIV-1 infection.. Twenty patients with acute/recent HIV-1 infection were randomized to receive ART alone (tenofovir, emtricitabine and lopinavir/ritonavir) or associated with 8 weeks of cyclosporine A (0.3-0.6 mg/kg twice daily). The impact on viral load, immune response and integrated and non-integrated DNA viral reservoir at 0, 8 and 36 weeks of treatment was evaluated.. The estimated median time from HIV-1 infection to ART onset was 63 days (IQR 53; 79.5) with 90% of patients at Fiebig V stage. No significant differences were observed in viral load decay, CD4 T cell recovery, immune response markers or the evolution of integrated DNA at week 8 (end of cyclosporine A) and week 36 between groups. However, non-integrated DNA significantly increased in the cyclosporine A arm between weeks 0 and 36. Cyclosporine A was well tolerated.. Adding cyclosporine A to ART during acute/recent infection did not improve immune recovery. However, unintegrated DNA increased in the cyclosporine A group, suggesting an anti-integration effect, a point warranting further research (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00979706).

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Cyclosporine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Ritonavir; Young Adult

Switching from PIs to dolutegravir in virologically suppressed HIV-infected individuals has not been assessed.. The principal aim was to assess the evolution of bone mineral density (BMD) when switching from a ritonavir-boosted PI to dolutegravir in HIV-infected patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis. The secondary objective was to assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of the switch therapy.. This randomized, multicentre study assessed changes in BMD, bone turnover markers, and antiviral efficacy and safety in 73 virologically suppressed patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis taking a ritonavir-boosted PI plus abacavir/lamivudine who were randomized to switch from PI to dolutegravir (DOLU group, n  =   37) or continue with a PI (PI group, n  =   36). Clinical Trials: NCT02577042.. One and three patients from the DOLU and PI groups, respectively, withdrew prematurely (unrelated to treatment). At 48 weeks, 97.3% versus 91.7%, respectively, maintained viral suppression (snapshot analysis, ITT, M = F). No significant differences were seen between the groups in percentage change from baseline to week 48 in femoral ( P  =   0.56) and lumbar spine ( P  =   0.29) BMD, although lumbar spine BMD improved by 1.43% (-1.36; 2.92) in the DOLU group [0.12% (-2.83; 2.89) in the PI group]. Bone marker values did not vary significantly. At week 48, triglycerides were lower ( P  <   0.001) and HDL cholesterol higher ( P  =   0.027) in the DOLU group.. Dolutegravir + Kivexa ® was safe and well-tolerated in virologically suppressed patients receiving a PI-based regimen. The lipid profile was better, albeit without significant changes in BMD, probably because of the short follow-up.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Bone Density; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Ritonavir; Viral Load

Combination ART (cART)-related toxicities and costs have prompted the need for treatment simplification. The ATLAS-M trial explored 48 week non-inferior efficacy of simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir  +  lamivudine versus maintaining three-drug atazanavir/ritonavir-based cART in virologically suppressed patients.. We performed an open-label, multicentre, randomized, non-inferiority study, enrolling HIV-infected adults on atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs, with stable HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL and CD4 + >200 cells/mm 3 . Main exclusion criteria were hepatitis B virus coinfection, past virological failure on or resistance to study drugs, recent AIDS and pregnancy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to either switch to 300 mg of atazanavir/100 mg of ritonavir once daily and 300 mg of lamivudine once daily (atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine arm) or to continue the previous regimen (atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arm). The primary study outcome was the maintenance of HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48 of the ITT-exposed (ITT-e) analysis with switch = failure. The non-inferiority margin was 12%. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01599364.. Between July 2011 and June 2014, 266 patients were randomized (133 to each arm). After 48 weeks, the primary study outcome was met by 119 of 133 patients (89.5%) in the atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine arm and 106 of 133 patients (79.7%) in the atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arm [difference atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine versus atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arm: +9.8% (95% CI + 1.2 to + 18.4)], demonstrating non-inferiority and superior efficacy of the atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine arm. Virological failure occurred in two (1.5%) patients in the atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine arm and six (4.5%) patients in the atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arm, without resistance selection. A similar proportion of adverse events occurred in both arms.. Treatment simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine showed non-inferior efficacy (superiority on post-hoc analysis) and a comparable safety profile over continuing atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs in virologically suppressed patients.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load; Young Adult

The contribution of specific antiretroviral drugs to cognitive function in HIV-infected people remains poorly understood. Efavirenz (EFV) may plausibly cause cognitive impairment. The objective of this study was therefore to determine whether chronic EFV therapy is a modifier of neurocognitive and neurometabolic function in the setting of suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy.. We performed an open-label phase IV controlled trial. Adult subjects who were stable on suppressive EFV therapy for at least 6 months were switched to ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) with no change in the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) backbone. The following parameters were assessed before and 10 weeks after therapy switch: cognitive function (by CogState. Sixteen subjects completed the study. Despite most subjects (81%) self-reporting memory problems at baseline, cognitive function, brain metabolites, and brain activity showed no change at 10 weeks after switch. Sleep quality improved on switch off EFV [mean PSQI (standard deviation): EFV, 8.5 (6.5); LPV/r, 5.8 (5.5); mean difference -0.4; 95% confidence interval -6.0 to -0.7].. This is the first study to assess the effects of chronic EFV therapy on neurological function in a controlled setting. We conclude that EFV withdrawal is unlikely to result in significant modification of neurocognitive function in otherwise stable HIV-infected people.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Brain Chemistry; Cognition; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is a novel respiratory illness firstly reported in Saudi Arabia in 2012. It is caused by a new corona virus, called MERS corona virus (MERS-CoV). Most people who have MERS-CoV infection developed severe acute respiratory illness.. This work is done to determine the clinical characteristics and the outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) admitted patients with confirmed MERS-CoV infection.. This study included 32 laboratory confirmed MERS corona virus infected patients who were admitted into ICU. It included 20 (62.50%) males and 12 (37.50%) females. The mean age was 43.99 ± 13.03 years. Diagnosis was done by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test for corona virus on throat swab, sputum, tracheal aspirate, or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. Clinical characteristics, co-morbidities and outcome were reported for all subjects.. Most MERS corona patients present with fever, cough, dyspnea, sore throat, runny nose and sputum. The presence of abdominal symptoms may indicate bad prognosis. Prolonged duration of symptoms before patients' hospitalization, prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay, bilateral radiological pulmonary infiltrates, and hypoxemic respiratory failure were found to be strong predictors of mortality in such patients. Also, old age, current smoking, smoking severity, presence of associated co-morbidities like obesity, diabetes mellitus, chronic heart diseases, COPD, malignancy, renal failure, renal transplantation and liver cirrhosis are associated with a poor outcome of ICU admitted MERS corona virus infected patients.. Plasma HO-1, ferritin, p21, and NQO1 were all elevated at baseline in CKD participants. Plasma HO-1 and urine NQO1 levels each inversely correlated with eGFR (. SnPP can be safely administered and, after its injection, the resulting changes in plasma HO-1, NQO1, ferritin, and p21 concentrations can provide information as to antioxidant gene responsiveness/reserves in subjects with and without kidney disease.. A Study with RBT-1, in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects with Stage 3-4 Chronic Kidney Disease, NCT0363002 and NCT03893799.. HFNC did not significantly modify work of breathing in healthy subjects. However, a significant reduction in the minute volume was achieved, capillary [Formula: see text] remaining constant, which suggests a reduction in dead-space ventilation with flows > 20 L/min. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02495675).. 3 组患者手术时间、术中显性失血量及术后 1 周血红蛋白下降量比较差异均无统计学意义（. 对于肥胖和超重的膝关节单间室骨关节炎患者，采用 UKA 术后可获满意短中期疗效，远期疗效尚需进一步随访观察。.. Decreased muscle strength was identified at both time points in patients with hEDS/HSD. The evolution of most muscle strength parameters over time did not significantly differ between groups. Future studies should focus on the effectiveness of different types of muscle training strategies in hEDS/HSD patients.. These findings support previous adverse findings of e-cigarette exposure on neurodevelopment in a mouse model and provide substantial evidence of persistent adverse behavioral and neuroimmunological consequences to adult offspring following maternal e-cigarette exposure during pregnancy. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6067.. This RCT directly compares a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen with a standard CROSS regimen in terms of overall survival for patients with locally advanced ESCC. The results of this RCT will provide an answer for the controversy regarding the survival benefits between the two treatment strategies.. NCT04138212, date of registration: October 24, 2019.. Results of current investigation indicated that milk type and post fermentation cooling patterns had a pronounced effect on antioxidant characteristics, fatty acid profile, lipid oxidation and textural characteristics of yoghurt. Buffalo milk based yoghurt had more fat, protein, higher antioxidant capacity and vitamin content. Antioxidant and sensory characteristics of T. If milk is exposed to excessive amounts of light, Vitamins B. The two concentration of ZnO nanoparticles in the ambient air produced two different outcomes. The lower concentration resulted in significant increases in Zn content of the liver while the higher concentration significantly increased Zn in the lungs (p < 0.05). Additionally, at the lower concentration, Zn content was found to be lower in brain tissue (p < 0.05). Using TEM/EDX we detected ZnO nanoparticles inside the cells in the lungs, kidney and liver. Inhaling ZnO NP at the higher concentration increased the levels of mRNA of the following genes in the lungs: Mt2 (2.56 fold), Slc30a1 (1.52 fold) and Slc30a5 (2.34 fold). At the lower ZnO nanoparticle concentration, only Slc30a7 mRNA levels in the lungs were up (1.74 fold). Thus the two air concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles produced distinct effects on the expression of the Zn-homeostasis related genes.. Until adverse health effects of ZnO nanoparticles deposited in organs such as lungs are further investigated and/or ruled out, the exposure to ZnO nanoparticles in aerosols should be avoided or minimised.

Topics: A549 Cells; Acetylmuramyl-Alanyl-Isoglutamine; Acinetobacter baumannii; Acute Lung Injury; Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Adenine; Adenocarcinoma; Adipogenesis; Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Ophthalmic; Adolescent; Adsorption; Adult; Aeromonas hydrophila; Aerosols; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Agriculture; Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Airway Remodeling; Alanine Transaminase; Albuminuria; Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family; Algorithms; AlkB Homolog 2, Alpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase; Alzheimer Disease; Amino Acid Sequence; Ammonia; Ammonium Compounds; Anaerobiosis; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antifungal Agents; Antigens, Bacterial; Antigens, CD; Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Antioxidants; Antitubercular Agents; Antiviral Agents; Apolipoproteins E; Apoptosis; Arabidopsis; Arabidopsis Proteins; Arsenic; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Asthma; Atherosclerosis; ATP-Dependent Proteases; Attitude of Health Personnel; Australia; Austria; Autophagy; Axitinib; Bacteria; Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins; Bacterial Proteins; Bacterial Toxins; Bacterial Typing Techniques; Bariatric Surgery; Base Composition; Bayes Theorem; Benzoxazoles; Benzylamines; beta Catenin; Betacoronavirus; Betula; Binding Sites; Biological Availability; Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis; Biomarkers; Biomarkers, Tumor; Biopsy; Bioreactors; Biosensing Techniques; Birth Weight; Blindness; Blood Chemical Analysis; Blood Gas Analysis; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Blood-Brain Barrier; Blotting, Western; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Bone and Bones; Bone Density; Bone Resorption; Borates; Brain; Brain Infarction; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Brain Neoplasms; Breakfast; Breast Milk Expression; Breast Neoplasms; Bronchi; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid; Buffaloes; Cadherins; Calcification, Physiologic; Calcium Compounds; Calcium, Dietary; Cannula; Caprolactam; Carbon; Carbon Dioxide; Carboplatin; Carcinogenesis; Carcinoma, Ductal; Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cardiovascular Diseases; Carps; Carrageenan; Case-Control Studies; Catalysis; Catalytic Domain; Cattle; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cell Adhesion; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Death; Cell Differentiation; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Cell Nucleus; Cell Phone Use; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Cell Transformation, Viral; Cells, Cultured; Cellulose; Chemical Phenomena; Chemoradiotherapy; Child; Child Development; Child, Preschool; China; Chitosan; Chlorocebus aethiops; Cholecalciferol; Chromatography, Liquid; Circadian Clocks; Circadian Rhythm; Circular Dichroism; Cisplatin; Citric Acid; Clinical Competence; Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Coculture Techniques; Cohort Studies; Cold Temperature; Colitis; Collagen Type I; Collagen Type I, alpha 1 Chain; Collagen Type XI; Color; Connective Tissue Diseases; Copper; Coronary Angiography; Coronavirus 3C Proteases; Coronavirus Infections; Cost of Illness; Counselors; COVID-19; COVID-19 Testing; Creatine Kinase; Creatinine; Cross-Over Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cryoelectron Microscopy; Cryosurgery; Crystallography, X-Ray; Cues; Cultural Competency; Cultural Diversity; Curriculum; Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21; Cycloparaffins; Cysteine Endopeptidases; Cytokines; Cytoplasm; Cytoprotection; Databases, Factual; Denitrification; Deoxycytidine; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diagnosis, Differential; Diatoms; Diet; Diet, High-Fat; Dietary Exposure; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Diketopiperazines; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Disease Models, Animal; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; DNA; DNA Damage; DNA Glycosylases; DNA Repair; DNA-Binding Proteins; DNA, Bacterial; DNA, Viral; Docetaxel; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Down-Regulation; Doxorubicin; Drosophila; Drosophila melanogaster; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Liberation; Drug Repositioning; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Edema; Edible Grain; Education, Graduate; Education, Medical, Graduate; Education, Pharmacy; Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome; Electron Transport Complex III; Electron Transport Complex IV; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems; Emergency Service, Hospital; Empathy; Emulsions; Endothelial Cells; Endurance Training; Energy Intake; Enterovirus A, Human; Environment; Environmental Monitoring; Enzyme Assays; Enzyme Inhibitors; Epithelial Cells; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Epoxide Hydrolases; Epoxy Compounds; Erythrocyte Count; Erythrocytes; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Escherichia coli Proteins; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; Esophagectomy; Estrogens; Etanercept; Ethiopia; Ethnicity; Ethylenes; Exanthema; Exercise; Exercise Test; Exercise Tolerance; Extracellular Matrix; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Eye Infections, Fungal; False Negative Reactions; Fatty Acids; Fecal Microbiota Transplantation; Feces; Female; Femur Neck; Fermentation; Ferritins; Fetal Development; Fibroblast Growth Factor-23; Fibroblast Growth Factors; Fibroblasts; Fibroins; Fish Proteins; Flavanones; Flavonoids; Focus Groups; Follow-Up Studies; Food Handling; Food Supply; Food, Formulated; Forced Expiratory Volume; Forests; Fractures, Bone; Fruit and Vegetable Juices; Fusobacteria; G1 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Gamma Rays; Gastrectomy; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors; Gefitinib; Gels; Gemcitabine; Gene Amplification; Gene Expression; Gene Expression Regulation; Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Gene Expression Regulation, Plant; Gene Knockdown Techniques; Gene-Environment Interaction; Genotype; Germany; Glioma; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glucagon; Glucocorticoids; Glycemic Control; Glycerol; Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta; Glycolipids; Glycolysis; Goblet Cells; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Graphite; Greenhouse Effect; Guanidines; Haemophilus influenzae; HCT116 Cells; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Health Personnel; Health Services Accessibility; Health Services Needs and Demand; Health Status Disparities; Healthy Volunteers; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Heart Transplantation; Heart-Assist Devices; HEK293 Cells; Heme; Heme Oxygenase-1; Hemolysis; Hemorrhage; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B e Antigens; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Hepatocytes; Hexoses; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Hippo Signaling Pathway; Histamine; Histamine Agonists; Histidine; Histone Deacetylase 2; HIV Infections; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Homebound Persons; Homeodomain Proteins; Homosexuality, Male; Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing; HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins; Humans; Hyaluronan Receptors; Hydrogen; Hydrogen Peroxide; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hydrolysis; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Hypoxia; Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Imatinib Mesylate; Immunotherapy; Implementation Science; Incidence; INDEL Mutation; Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells; Industrial Waste; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Inflammation; Inflammation Mediators; Infliximab; Infusions, Intravenous; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Injections; Insecticides; Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 5; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Interleukin-1; Interleukin-17; Interleukin-8; Internship and Residency; Intestines; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Ion Transport; Iridaceae; Iridoid Glucosides; Islets of Langerhans Transplantation; Isodon; Isoflurane; Isotopes; Italy; Joint Instability; Ketamine; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Function Tests; Kidney Neoplasms; Kinetics; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Knee Joint; Kruppel-Like Factor 4; Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors; Lactate Dehydrogenase 5; Laparoscopy; Laser Therapy; Lasers, Semiconductor; Lasers, Solid-State; Laurates; Lead; Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Light; Lipid Peroxidation; Lipopolysaccharides; Liposomes; Liver; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Locomotion; Longitudinal Studies; Lopinavir; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Lubricants; Lung; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphocyte Activation; Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating; Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell; Lysosomes; Macrophages; Male; Manganese Compounds; MAP Kinase Kinase 4; Mass Screening; Maternal Health; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Melanoma, Experimental; Memantine; Membrane Glycoproteins; Membrane Proteins; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Metal Nanoparticles; Metalloendopeptidases; Metalloporphyrins; Methadone; Methane; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Mexico; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Inbred ICR; Mice, Knockout; Mice, Nude; Mice, SCID; Mice, Transgenic; Microarray Analysis; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Microbiota; Micronutrients; MicroRNAs; Microscopy, Confocal; Microsomes, Liver; Middle Aged; Milk; Milk, Human; Minority Groups; Mitochondria; Mitochondrial Membranes; Mitochondrial Proteins; Models, Animal; Models, Molecular; Molecular Conformation; Molecular Docking Simulation; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Molecular Epidemiology; Molecular Structure; Molecular Weight; Multilocus Sequence Typing; Multimodal Imaging; Muscle Strength; Muscle, Skeletal; Muscular Diseases; Mutation; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Myocardial Stunning; Myristates; NAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone); Nanocomposites; Nanogels; Nanoparticles; Nanotechnology; Naphthalenes; Nasal Cavity; National Health Programs; Necrosis; Needs Assessment; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neonicotinoids; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Proteins; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasm Transplantation; Neoplasms; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Netherlands; Neuroblastoma; Neuroprotective Agents; Neutrophils; NF-kappa B; NFATC Transcription Factors; Nicotiana; Nicotine; Nitrates; Nitrification; Nitrites; Nitro Compounds; Nitrogen; Nitrogen Dioxide; North Carolina; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular; Nuclear Proteins; Nucleic Acid Hybridization; Nucleosomes; Nutrients; Obesity; Obesity, Morbid; Oceans and Seas; Oncogene Protein v-akt; Oncogenes; Oocytes; Open Reading Frames; Osteoclasts; Osteogenesis; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Outpatients; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovariectomy; Overweight; Oxazines; Oxidants; Oxidation-Reduction; Oxidative Stress; Oxides; Oxidoreductases; Oxygen; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Oxygenators, Membrane; Ozone; Paclitaxel; Paenibacillus; Pain Measurement; Palliative Care; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pandemics; Parasympathetic Nervous System; Particulate Matter; Pasteurization; Patient Preference; Patient Satisfaction; Pediatric Obesity; Permeability; Peroxiredoxins; Peroxynitrous Acid; Pharmaceutical Services; Pharmacists; Pharmacy; Phaseolus; Phenotype; Phoeniceae; Phosphates; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Phospholipid Transfer Proteins; Phospholipids; Phosphorus; Phosphorylation; Photoperiod; Photosynthesis; Phylogeny; Physical Endurance; Physicians; Pilot Projects; Piperidines; Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide; Plant Extracts; Plant Leaves; Plant Proteins; Plant Roots; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Pneumonia; Pneumonia, Viral; Point-of-Care Testing; Polyethylene Glycols; Polymers; Polysorbates; Pore Forming Cytotoxic Proteins; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Positron-Emission Tomography; Postprandial Period; Poverty; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Prediabetic State; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy, High-Risk; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Pressure; Prevalence; Primary Graft Dysfunction; Primary Health Care; Professional Role; Professionalism; Prognosis; Progression-Free Survival; Prolactin; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Proof of Concept Study; Proportional Hazards Models; Propylene Glycol; Prospective Studies; Prostate; Protein Binding; Protein Biosynthesis; Protein Isoforms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein Phosphatase 2; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Protein Structure, Tertiary; Protein Transport; Proteoglycans; Proteome; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Proton Pumps; Protons; Protoporphyrins; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas fluorescens; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Pulmonary Gas Exchange; Pulmonary Veins; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyrimidines; Qualitative Research; Quinoxalines; Rabbits; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Histamine H3; Receptors, Immunologic; Receptors, Transferrin; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; Reference Values; Referral and Consultation; Regional Blood Flow; Registries; Regulon; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Reperfusion Injury; Repressor Proteins; Reproducibility of Results; Republic of Korea; Research Design; Resistance Training; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Respiratory Insufficiency; Resuscitation; Retinal Dehydrogenase; Retreatment; Retrospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Rhinitis, Allergic; Ribosomal Proteins; Ribosomes; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Rivers; RNA Interference; RNA-Seq; RNA, Messenger; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; RNA, Small Interfering; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Rural Population; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; Salivary Ducts; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; San Francisco; SARS-CoV-2; Satiation; Satiety Response; Schools; Schools, Pharmacy; Seasons; Seawater; Selection, Genetic; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Serine-Threonine Kinase 3; Sewage; Sheep; Sheep, Domestic; Shock, Hemorrhagic; Signal Transduction; Silver; Silymarin; Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography; Sirolimus; Sirtuin 1; Skin; Skin Neoplasms; Skin Physiological Phenomena; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Social Class; Social Participation; Social Support; Soil; Soil Microbiology; Solutions; Somatomedins; Soot; Specimen Handling; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Spectrum Analysis; Spinal Fractures; Spirometry; Staphylococcus aureus; STAT1 Transcription Factor; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Streptomyces coelicolor; Stress, Psychological; Stroke; Stroke Volume; Structure-Activity Relationship; Students, Medical; Students, Pharmacy; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; Sulfur Dioxide; Surface Properties; Surface-Active Agents; Surveys and Questionnaires; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Survivin; Sweden; Swine; Swine, Miniature; Sympathetic Nervous System; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Talaromyces; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; tau Proteins; Telemedicine; Telomerase; Telomere; Telomere Homeostasis; Temperature; Terminally Ill; Th1 Cells; Thiamethoxam; Thiazoles; Thiophenes; Thioredoxin Reductase 1; Thrombosis; Thulium; Thyroid Cancer, Papillary; Thyroid Carcinoma, Anaplastic; Thyroid Neoplasms; Time Factors; Titanium; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Transcription Factor AP-1; Transcription Factors; Transcription, Genetic; Transcriptional Activation; Transcriptome; Transforming Growth Factor beta1; Transistors, Electronic; Translational Research, Biomedical; Transplantation Tolerance; Transplantation, Homologous; Transportation; Treatment Outcome; Tretinoin; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary; Tubulin Modulators; Tumor Microenvironment; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Twins; Ultrasonic Therapy; Ultrasonography; Ultraviolet Rays; United States; Up-Regulation; Uranium; Urethra; Urinary Bladder; Urodynamics; Uromodulin; Uveitis; Vasoconstrictor Agents; Ventricular Function, Left; Vero Cells; Vesicular Transport Proteins; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Visual Acuity; Vital Capacity; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency; Vitamin K 2; Vitamins; Volatilization; Voriconazole; Waiting Lists; Waste Disposal, Fluid; Wastewater; Water Pollutants, Chemical; Whole Genome Sequencing; Wine; Wnt Signaling Pathway; Wound Healing; Wounds and Injuries; WW Domains; X-linked Nuclear Protein; X-Ray Diffraction; Xanthines; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays; YAP-Signaling Proteins; Yogurt; Young Adult; Zebrafish; Zebrafish Proteins; Ziziphus

HIV treatment guidelines endorse switching or simplification of antiretroviral therapy in therapy-experienced patients with suppressed viraemia; ritonavir discontinuation may also enhance tolerability and reduce long-term adverse events (AEs). This open-label, multicentre, noninferiority study enrolled HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced adults with confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≤ 75 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL currently receiving tenofovir/emtricitabine + atazanavir/ritonavir (TDF/FTC + ATV/r) for ≥ 6 months with no reported history of virological failure.. Participants were randomized 1:2 to continue current treatment or switch to abacavir/lamivudine + atazanavir (ABC/3TC + ATV). Endpoints included the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL by time to loss of virological response (TLOVR), AEs, fasting lipids, and inflammatory, coagulation, bone and renal biomarkers.. After 48 weeks, 76% (152 of 199) of ABC/3TC + ATV-treated and 79% (77 of 97) of TDF/FTC + ATV/r-treated participants had HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (TLOVR; P = 0.564). Other efficacy analyses yielded similar results. Rates of new grade 2-4 AEs were 45% in both groups, but an excess of hyperbilirubinaemia made the rate of treatment-emergent grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities higher with TDF/FTC + ATV/r (36%) compared with ABC/3TC + ATV (19%). Most fasting lipid levels remained stable over time; high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased modestly in ABC/3TC + ATV-treated participants. Bone and renal biomarkers improved significantly between baseline and week 48 in participants taking ABC/3TC + ATV and were stable in participants taking TDF/FTC + ATV/r. No significant changes occurred in any inflammatory or coagulation biomarker within or between treatment groups.. The ABC/3TC + ATV treatment-switch group had similar viral suppression rates up to 48 weeks to the TDF/FTC + ATV/r comparator group, with lower rates of moderate- to high-grade hyperbilirubinaemia and improvements in bone and renal biomarkers.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Biomarkers; Bone Density; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Drug Substitution; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Kidney; Lamivudine; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Sensory peripheral neuropathy (PN) remains a common complication in HIV-positive patients despite effective combination anti-retroviral therapy (ART). Data on PN on second-line ART is scarce. We assessed PN using a standard tool in patients failing first-line ART and for 96 weeks following a switch to PI-based second-line ART in a large Randomised Clinical Trial in Sub-Saharan Africa. Factors associated with PN were investigated using logistic regression. Symptomatic PN (SPN) prevalence was 22% at entry (N = 1,251) and was associated (p < 0.05) with older age (OR = 1.04 per year), female gender (OR = 1.64), Tuberculosis (TB; OR = 1.86), smoking (OR = 1.60), higher plasma creatinine (OR = 1.09 per 0.1 mg/dl increase), CD4 count (OR = 0.83 per doubling) and not consuming alcohol (OR = 0.55). SPN prevalence decreased to 17% by week 96 (p = 0.0002) following similar trends in all study groups (p = 0.30). Asymptomatic PN (APN) increased over the same period from 21 to 29% (p = 0.0002). Signs suggestive of PN (regardless of symptoms) returned to baseline levels by week 96. At weeks 48 and 96, after adjusting for time-updated associations above and baseline CD4 count and viral load, SPN was strongly associated with TB (p < 0.0001). In summary, SPN prevalence was significantly reduced with PI-based second-line therapy across all treatment groups, but we did not find any advantage to the NRTI-free regimens. The increase of APN and stability of PN-signs regardless of symptoms suggest an underlying trend of neuropathy progression that may be masked by reduction of symptoms accompanying general health improvement induced by second-line ART. SPN was strongly associated with isoniazid given for TB treatment.

Topics: Adult; Africa South of the Sahara; Alcohol Abstinence; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antitubercular Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Isoniazid; Logistic Models; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Smoking; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary; Viral Load

Efavirenz (EFV) has been associated with reductions in vitamin D (25[OH]D) and tenofovir (TDF) with increased bone turnover, reductions in bone mineral density (BMD) and renal tubular dysfunction. We hypothesized that switching from fixed-dose TDF/emtricitabine (FTC)/EFV to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy (DRV/r) might increase 25(OH)D and BMD, and improve renal tubular function.. Subjects with HIV RNA <50 copies/ml on TDF/FTC/EFV for ≥6 months were randomized 1:1 to ongoing TDF/FTC/EFV or DRV/r (800/100 mg once daily) for 48 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in 25(OH)D at week 48. Secondary end points included changes in BMD, bone turnover markers and renal tubular function.. A total of 64 subjects (86% male, 66% white, mean [sd] CD4(+) T-cell count 537.3 [191.5]/mm(3)) were analysed. After adjustment for baseline 25(OH)D and demographics, at week 48 DRV/r monotherapy was associated with a +3.6 (95% CI 0.6, 6.6) ng/ml increase in 25(OH)D compared to TDF/FTC/EFV (P=0.02). DRV/r monotherapy was associated with an increase in BMD (+2.9% versus -0.003% at the neck of femur and +2.6% versus +0.008% at the lumbar spine for DRV/r versus TDF/FTC/EFV; P<0.05 for all) and reductions in bone biomarkers compared with those remaining on TDF/FTC/EFV. No significant difference in renal tubular function was observed. Reasons for discontinuation in the DRV/r arm included side effects (n=4) and viral load rebound (n=3), all of which resolved with DRV/r discontinuation or regimen intensification.. Switching from TDF/FTC/EFV to DRV/r in patients with suppressed HIV RNA resulted in significant improvements in 25(OH)D and bone biomarkers, and a 2-3% increase in BMD.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Bone and Bones; Bone Density; Calcifediol; Darunavir; Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Vitamin D

Antiretroviral (ARV) regimens used for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV have evolved over time. We evaluated the contribution of different ARV regimens on the reduction of the plasma HIV RNA viral load (VL) during pregnancy.. A total of 1,833 VL measurements from ARV-naive pregnant women participating in perinatal prevention trials in Thailand were included. Women received either zidovudine (ZDV) monotherapy, ZDV plus lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), or ZDV plus lamivudine (3TC) plus LPV/r. VL time-course during pregnancy was described as a function of pretreatment VL and treatment duration using an Emax non-linear mixed-effect model. VL reduction and median time to achieve a VL<50 copies/ml were estimated for each regimen.. Among 745 women, 279 (37%), 145 (20%) and 321 (43%) received ZDV monotherapy, ZDV+LPV/r and ZDV+3TC+LPV/r, respectively. The predicted VL reduction from baseline to delivery after a median of 10 weeks of treatment were 0.5, 2.7 and 2.9 log10 copies/ml with ZDV monotherapy, ZDV+LPV/r and ZDV+3TC+LPV/r, respectively. At delivery, 1%, 57% and 63% of women receiving ZDV monotherapy, ZDV+LPV/r or ZDV+3TC+LPV/r had a VL<50 copies/ml. The addition of 3TC to ZDV+LPV/r reduced the time to achieve a VL<50 copies/ml and the higher the pretreatment VL, the larger the effect 3TC had on reducing the time to VL<50 copies/ml.. The addition of 3TC to ZDV+LPV/r was associated with a slight further VL reduction but the time to reach a VL<50 copies/ml was shorter. This beneficial effect of 3TC is crucial for prevention of mother-to-child transmission in women who receive ARVs late and with high pretreatment VL.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Ritonavir; Thailand; Viral Load; Zidovudine

Lopinavir-ritonavir is frequently prescribed to HIV-1-infected women during pregnancy. Decreased lopinavir exposure has been reported during pregnancy, but the clinical significance of this reduction is uncertain. This analysis aimed to evaluate the need for lopinavir dose adjustment during pregnancy. We conducted a population pharmacokinetic analysis of lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations collected from 84 pregnant and 595 nonpregnant treatment-naive and -experienced HIV-1-infected subjects enrolled in six clinical studies. Lopinavir-ritonavir doses in the studies ranged between 400/100 and 600/150 mg twice daily. In addition, linear mixed-effect analysis was used to compare the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12) and concentration prior to dosing (Cpredose) in pregnant women and nonpregnant subjects. The relationship between lopinavir exposure and virologic suppression in pregnant women and nonpregnant subjects was evaluated. Population pharmacokinetic analysis estimated 17% higher lopinavir clearance in pregnant women than in nonpregnant subjects. Lopinavir clearance values postpartum were 26.4% and 37.1% lower than in nonpregnant subjects and pregnant women, respectively. As the tablet formulation was estimated to be 20% more bioavailable than the capsule formulation, no statistically significant differences between lopinavir exposure in pregnant women receiving the tablet formulation and nonpregnant subjects receiving the capsule formulation were identified. In the range of lopinavir AUC0-12 or Cpredose values observed in the third trimester, there was no correlation between lopinavir exposure and viral load or proportion of subjects with virologic suppression. Similar efficacy was observed between pregnant women and nonpregnant subjects receiving lopinavir-ritonavir at 400/100 mg twice daily. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic results support the use of a lopinavir-ritonavir 400/100-mg twice-daily dose during pregnancy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Ritonavir; Tablets; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Viral Load

To assess neurocognitive function at the first-line antiretroviral therapy failure and change on the second-line therapy.. Randomized controlled trial was conducted in 5 sub-Saharan African countries.. Patients failing the first-line therapy according to WHO criteria after >12 months on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors-based regimens were randomized to the second-line therapy (open-label) with lopinavir/ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg twice daily) plus either 2-3 clinician-selected nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, raltegravir, or as monotherapy after 12-week induction with raltegravir. Neurocognitive function was tested at baseline, weeks 48 and 96 using color trails tests 1 and 2, and the Grooved Pegboard test. Test results were converted to an average of the 3 individual test z-scores.. A total of 1036 patients (90% of those >18 years enrolled at 13 evaluable sites) had valid baseline tests (58% women, median: 38 years, viral load: 65,000 copies per milliliter, CD4 count: 73 cells per cubic millimeter). Mean (SD) baseline z-score was -2.96 (1.74); lower baseline z-scores were independently associated with older age, lower body weight, higher viral load, lower hemoglobin, less education, fewer weekly working hours, previous central nervous system disease, and taking fluconazole (P < 0.05 in multivariable model). Z-score was increased by mean (SE) of +1.23 (0.04) after 96 weeks on the second-line therapy (P < 0.001; n = 915 evaluable), with no evidence of difference between the treatment arms (P = 0.35).. Patients in sub-Saharan Africa failing the first-line therapy had low neurocognitive function test scores, but performance improved on the second-line therapy. Regimens with more central nervous system-penetrating drugs did not enhance neurocognitive recovery indicating this need not be a primary consideration in choosing a second-line regimen.

Topics: Adult; Africa South of the Sahara; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cognition; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Neurocognitive Disorders; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Viral Load

Strategies to prevent postnatal mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Africa, including infant prophylaxis, have never been assessed past 6 months of breastfeeding, despite breastfeeding being recommended up to 12 months after birth. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of infant prophylaxis with the two drug regimens (lamivudine or lopinavir-ritonavir) to prevent postnatal HIV-1 transmission up to 50 weeks of breastfeeding.. We did a randomised controlled trial in four sites in Burkina Faso, South Africa, Uganda, and Zambia in children born to HIV-1-infected mothers not eligible for antiretroviral therapy (CD4 count >350 cells per μL). An independent researcher electronically generated a randomisation schedule; we then used sequentially numbered envelopes to randomly assign (1:1) HIV-1-uninfected breastfed infants aged 7 days to either lopinavir-ritonavir or lamivudine (paediatric liquid formulations, twice a day) up to 1 week after complete cessation of breastfeeding or at the final visit at week 50. We stratified the randomisation by country and used permuted blocks of four and six. We used a study label on drug bottles to mask participants, study physicians, and assessors to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was infant HIV-1 infection between age 7 days and 50 weeks, diagnosed every 3 months with HIV-1 DNA PCR, in the modified intention-to-treat population (all who attended at least one follow-up visit). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00640263.. Between Nov 16, 2009, and May 7, 2012, we enrolled and randomised 1273 infants and analysed 1236; 615 assigned to lopinavir-ritonavir or 621 assigned to lamivudine. 17 HIV-1 infections were diagnosed in the study period (eight in the lopinavir-ritonavir group and nine in the lamivudine group), resulting in cumulative HIV-1 infection of 1.4% (95% CI 0.4-2.5) and 1.5% (0.7-2.5), respectively. Infection rates did not differ between the two drug regimens (hazard ratio [HR] of lopinavir-ritonavir versus lamivudine of 0.90, 95% CI 0.35-2.34; p=0.83). Clinical and biological severe adverse events did not differ between groups; 251 (51%) infants had a grade 3-4 event in the lopinavir-ritonavir group compared with 246 (50%) in the lamivudine group.. Infant HIV-1 prophylaxis with lopinavir-ritonavir was not superior to lamivudine and both drugs led to very low rates of HIV-1 postnatal transmission for up to 50 weeks of breastfeeding. Infant pre-exposure prophylaxis should be extended until the end of HIV-1 exposure and mothers should be informed about the persistent risk of transmission throughout breastfeeding.. INSERM/National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis (including funds from the Total Foundation), European Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, Research Council of Norway.

Topics: Africa South of the Sahara; Anti-HIV Agents; Breast Feeding; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Ritonavir

This open-label, multinational, pilot study randomized (1:2 ratio) adults with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies per milliliter and nucleos(t)ide-related safety/tolerability issues to switch to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (n = 37) or the nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing regimen of ATV/r plus raltegravir (RAL) (n = 72). At 24 weeks, 35/37 (94.6%) and 58/72 (80.6%) of patients, respectively, maintained virological suppression, the primary endpoint, and 1 (2.7%) and 7 (9.7%), respectively, experienced virological rebound. Corresponding 48-week proportions were 86.5%, 69.4%, 2.7%, and 12.5%, respectively. Adherence was lower and treatment discontinuation was higher with ATV/r+RAL. In conclusion, switching to ATV/r+RAL resulted in a higher virological rebound rate than switching to ATV/r plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine.

Topics: Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Viral Load; Young Adult

Ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) was evaluated as initial therapy in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients because of its potency, unique resistance profile, and high genetic barrier. Trial 1182.33, an open-label, randomized trial, compared two TPV/r dose combinations versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r). Eligible adults, who had no prior antiretroviral therapy were randomized to twice daily (BID) 500/100 mg TPV/r, 500/200 mg TPV/r, or 400/100 mg LPV/r. Each treatment group also received Tenofovir 300 mg + Lamivudine 300 mg QD. The primary endpoint was a confirmed viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL at week 48 without prior antiretroviral regimen changes. Primary analyses examined CD4-adjusted response rates for non-inferiority, using a 15% non-inferiority margin. At week 48, VL<50 copies/mL was 68.4%, 69.9%, and 72.4% in TPV/r100, TPV/r200, and LPV/r groups, respectively, and TPV/r groups showed non-inferiority to LPV/r. Discontinuation due to adverse events was higher in TPV/r100 (10.3%) and TPV/r200 (15.3%) recipients versus LPV/r (3.2%) recipients. The frequency of grade ≥3 transaminase elevations was higher in the TPV/r200 group than the other groups, leading to closure of this group. However, upon continued treatment or following re-introduction after treatment interruption, transaminase elevations returned to grade ≤2 in >65% of patients receiving either TPV/r200 or TPV/r100. The trial was subsequently discontinued; primary objectives were achieved and continuing TPV/r100 was less tolerable than standard of care for initial highly active antiretroviral therapy. All treatment groups had similar 48-week treatment responses. TPV/r100 and TPV/r200 regimens resulted in sustained treatment responses, which were non-inferior to LPV/r at 48 weeks. When compared with the LPV/r regimen and examined in the light of more current regimens, these TPV/r regimens do not appear to be the best options for treatment-naïve patients based on their safety profiles.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Young Adult

Guidelines for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection consistently recommend initiation of antiretroviral therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-1 coinfection. Therefore, potential drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and HCV direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) must be carefully considered. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the compatibility of a novel combination of DAAs (the 3D regimen) with commonly prescribed HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs).. Five phase 1, multiple-dose, open-label pharmacokinetic studies were performed in 144 healthy volunteers. Participants in each study were randomly assigned 1:1 into cohorts assessing the effects of the steady-state 3D regimen on steady-state HIV-1 PIs or vice versa. The 3D regimen comprised ombitasvir (25 mg once daily), paritaprevir/ritonavir (150/100 mg once daily), and dasabuvir (250 or 400 mg twice daily). The HIV-1 PIs assessed included atazanavir, darunavir, and lopinavir (administered with ritonavir). Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed to evaluate the compatibility of the drug regimens.. Coadministration of the 3D regimen with the evaluated HIV-1 PIs was generally well tolerated in healthy volunteers. Morning administration of atazanavir (300 mg once daily) and darunavir regimens exhibited no clinically meaningful drug interactions with the 3D regimen. However, owing to higher paritaprevir and/or ritonavir exposures, evening administration of atazanavir (300 mg) plus ritonavir (100 mg) or lopinavir/ritonavir (800/200 mg) with the 3D regimen is not recommended.. The 3D regimen can be coadministered with morning atazanavir and darunavir regimens. However, evening atazanavir plus ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir regimens are not recommended in combination with the 3D regimen.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adolescent; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine; Young Adult

Antiretroviral treatment simplification strategies based on monotherapy with darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) have not been directly compared in clinical trials. We evaluated the 48-week efficacy and safety of DRV/r versus LPV/r monotherapy as a treatment simplification strategy in a multicenter, randomized open-label study. Maintenance of viral suppression in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and semen was also explored. An intention to treat efficacy analysis was performed considering missing equals to failure (ITT:M = F). Virological failure (VF) was defined as a confirmed increase in plasma HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mL. A total of 75 patients were enrolled: 40 were allocated to DRVr and 33 to LPVr. In the ITT: M = F analysis, 77.5% of patients on DRV/r and 66.6% of patients on LPV/r maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48 (p = .302, treatment difference 10.8% [95% CI,-12.6 to 34.2]). In the DRV/r arm, no patients developed VF and 15.0% discontinued treatment due to adverse events. In the LPV/r arm, 2 (6.1%) patients developed VF and 18.2% discontinued monotherapy due to adverse events. Gastrointestinal disturbances were experienced by 18.2% and 2.5% of patients in the LPV/r and DRV/r arms, respectively (p = .019). Two patients had detectable HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL in CSF or semen. Monotherapy with LPV/r or DRV/r seems to be virologically effective in selected HIV-1-infected patients with sustained viral suppression. Differences between both regimens seem driven mainly by the better tolerability profile of DRV/r.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cerebrospinal Fluid; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Semen; Viral Load; Young Adult

The current study was conducted to determine if efavirenz (EFV) or atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r)-based combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) impacted steady-state atovaquone plasma concentrations in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients receiving treatment doses of atovaquone.. Thirty HIV-infected volunteers were recruited, 10 taking no cART and 10 each taking cART that included EFV or ATV/r. Subjects were randomly assigned to atovaquone 750 mg twice daily (BID) for 14 days followed by atovaquone 1500 mg BID for 14 days, or vice-versa, with a washout period in between. On day 14 of each phase, blood was sampled for pharmacokinetic studies, and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUCτ) and average concentration (C avg) were calculated and compared using an unpaired t test.. Twenty-nine subjects completed both dosing cohorts. Subjects receiving EFV-based cART had 47% and 44% lower atovaquone AUCτ than subjects not receiving cART at atovaquone doses of 750 mg BID and 1500 mg BID, respectively (P≤ .01). Only 5 of 10 subjects receiving EFV-based cART plus atovaquone 750 mg BID had an atovaquone C avg>15 µg/mL, which has previously been associated with successful treatment of Pneumocystis jirovecipneumonia. AUCτ and Cavg did not significantly differ for concurrent ATV/r for 750 mg BID or 1500 mg BID when compared to the group not receiving cART. Nine of 10 subjects not receiving cART, 8 of 10 subjects receiving ATV/r, and 2 of 10 subjects receiving EFV in combination with atovaquone 750 mg BID achieved an atovaquone C avg>18.5 µg/mL, a concentration that has previously been associated with successful treatment of Toxoplasmaencephalitis (TE).. These data suggest that the currently recommended dose of atovaquone 750 mg BID for treatment of mild to moderate PCP may not be adequate in patients receiving concurrent EFV. Furthermore, doses lower than the currently recommended dose of 1500 mg BID may achieve plasma concentrations adequate to treat TE in HIV-infected patients not receiving EFV.. NCT01479361.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Atovaquone; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Encephalitis; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Toxoplasmosis, Cerebral; Young Adult

Artemether-lumefantrine is currently the most widely recommended treatment of uncomplicated malaria. Lopinavir-based antiretroviral therapy is the commonly recommended second-line HIV treatment. Artemether and lumefantrine are metabolised by cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP3A4, which lopinavir/ritonavir inhibits, potentially causing clinically important drug-drug interactions.. An adaptive, parallel-design safety and pharmacokinetic study was conducted in HIV-infected (malaria-negative) patients: antiretroviral-naïve and those stable on lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretrovirals. Both groups received the recommended six-dose artemether-lumefantrine treatment. The primary outcome was day-7 lumefantrine concentrations, as these correlate with antimalarial efficacy. Adverse events were solicited throughout the study, recording the onset, duration, severity, and relationship to artemether-lumefantrine.. We enrolled 34 patients. Median day-7 lumefantrine concentrations were almost 10-fold higher in the lopinavir than the antiretroviral-naïve group [3170 versus 336 ng/mL; p = 0.0001], with AUC(0-inf) and Cmax increased five-fold [2478 versus 445 μg.h/mL; p = 0.0001], and three-fold [28.2 versus 8.8 μg/mL; p < 0.0001], respectively. Lumefantrine Cmax, and AUC(0-inf) increased significantly with mg/kg dose in the lopinavir, but not the antiretroviral-naïve group. While artemether exposure was similar between groups, Cmax and AUC(0-8h) of its active metabolite dihydroartemisinin were initially two-fold higher in the lopinavir group [p = 0.004 and p = 0.0013, respectively]. However, this difference was no longer apparent after the last artemether-lumefantrine dose. Within 21 days of starting artemether-lumefantrine there were similar numbers of treatment emergent adverse events (42 vs. 35) and adverse reactions (12 vs. 15, p = 0.21) in the lopinavir and antiretroviral-naïve groups, respectively. There were no serious adverse events and no difference in electrocardiographic QTcF- and PR-intervals, at the predicted lumefantrine Tmax.. Despite substantially higher lumefantrine exposure, intensive monitoring in our relatively small study raised no safety concerns in HIV-infected patients stable on lopinavir-based antiretroviral therapy given the recommended artemether-lumefantrine dosage. Increased day-7 lumefantrine concentrations have been shown previously to reduce the risk of malaria treatment failure, but further evidence in adult patients co-infected with malaria and HIV is needed to assess the artemether-lumefantrine risk : benefit profile in this vulnerable population fully. Our antiretroviral-naïve patients confirmed previous findings that lumefantrine absorption is almost saturated at currently recommended doses, but this dose-limited absorption was overcome in the lopinavir group.. Clinical Trial Registration number NCT00869700. Registered on clinicaltrials.gov 25 March 2009.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Artemether; Artemisinins; Drug Interactions; Ethanolamines; Female; Fluorenes; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Lumefantrine; Male; Ritonavir

Protease inhibitors (PIs) are used as a first-line regimen in HIV-1-infected children. Here we investigated the phenotypic consequences of amino acid changes in Gag and protease on lopinavir (LPV) and ritonavir (RTV) susceptibility among pediatric patients failing PI therapy. The Gag-protease from isolates from 20 HIV-1 subtype C-infected pediatric patients failing an LPV and/or RTV-based regimen was phenotyped using a nonreplicativein vitroassay. Changes in sensitivity to LPV and RTV relative to that of the matched baseline (pretherapy) sample were calculated. Gag and protease amino acid substitutions associated with PI failure were created in a reference clone by site-directed mutagenesis and assessed. Predicted phenotypes were determined using the Stanford drug resistance algorithm. Phenotypic resistance or reduced susceptibility to RTV and/or LPV was observed in isolates from 10 (50%) patients, all of whom had been treated with RTV. In most cases, this was associated with protease resistance mutations, but substitutions at Gag cleavage and noncleavage sites were also detected. Gag amino acid substitutions were also found in isolates from three patients with reduced drug susceptibilities who had wild-type protease. Site-directed mutagenesis confirmed that some amino acid changes in Gag contributed to PI resistance but only in the presence of major protease resistance-associated substitutions. The isolates from all patients who received LPV exclusively were phenotypically susceptible. Baseline isolates from the 20 patients showed a large (47-fold) range in the 50% effective concentration of LPV, which accounted for most of the discordance seen between the experimentally determined and the predicted phenotypes. Overall, the inclusion of thegaggene and the use of matched baseline samples provided a more comprehensive assessment of the effect of PI-induced amino acid changes on PI resistance. The lack of phenotypic resistance to LPV supports the continued use of this drug in pediatric patients.

Topics: Amino Acid Substitution; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Gene Expression; Gene Products, gag; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Mutagenesis, Site-Directed; Mutation; Phenotype; Ritonavir; Treatment Failure

Long acting antiretroviral drugs represent a promising approach for chronic treatment of HIV infection. Here, we study the efficacy and safety of albuvirtide (ABT), an HIV-1 fusion inhibitor with a half life of 11-12 days in human.. ABT was evaluated in a 7-week, open-label and randomized trial, combining with LPV/r. Twenty HIV-1-infected adults were assigned to two dose groups, receiving ABT (160 or 320 mg) given weekly and LPV/r given twice daily.. At week 7, the decline of HIV-1 RNA from baseline was 1.9 (1.3-2.3) log10 and 2.2 (1.6-2.7) log10 copies/ml, and suppression of HIV-1 RNA to below 50 copies/ml was achieved in 11.1 % (1/9) and 55.6 % (5/9) patients, for the 160 and 320 mg dose group respectively.. A clear dose-efficacy correlation of ABT was demonstrated. ABT combining with LPV/r is a promising two-drug regimen to be tested in larger patient population.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Maleimides; Middle Aged; Peptides; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Boosted protease inhibitors (PIs), including ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r), are a recommended option for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection based upon clinical trial data; however, long-term real-life clinical data are limited.. We evaluated the long-term use of ATV/r as a component of antiretroviral combination therapy in the real-life setting in the REMAIN study.. This was an observational cohort study conducted at sites across Germany, Portugal, and Spain. Retrospective historical and prospective longitudinal follow-up data were extracted every six months from medical records of HIV-infected treatment-naïve patients aged ≥ 18 years initiating a first-line ATV/r-containing regimen.. Eligible patients (n = 517) were followed up for a median of 3.4 years. The proportion remaining on ATV/r at 5 years was 51.5% with an estimated Kaplan-Meier median time to treatment discontinuation of 4.9 years. Principal reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (15.9%; 8.9% due to hyperbilirubinemia) and virologic failure (6.8%). The Kaplan-Meier probability of not having virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.83) at five years. No treatment-emergent major PI resistance occurred. ATV/r was generally well tolerated during long-term treatment with no significant changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate over five years.. In a real-life clinical setting over five years, treatment-naïve patients with HIV-1 infection initiating an ATV/r-based regimen showed sustained virologic suppression, an overall treatment persistence rate of 51.5%, an absence of treatment-emergent major PI resistance mutations at virologic failure, a long-term safety profile consistent with that observed in clinical trials, and no significant decline in renal function.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cohort Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Europe; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The phase 4, METABOLIK trial demonstrated that changes in metabolic parameters with darunavir with low-dose ritonavir (DRV/r) were comparable to those observed with atazanavir with low-dose ritonavir (ATV/r). A comprehensive assessment of the effects of these agents on insulin sensitivity will provide additional, relevant clinical information.. In this substudy of METABOLIK, HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral agent-naïve male subjects aged ≥18 years with a viral load of >1,000 copies/mL were randomized to receive DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily (qd) or ATV/r 300/100 mg qd, both with a fixed dose of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine 300/200 mg qd. The effects of DRV/r versus ATV/r on insulin sensitivity over 48 weeks were compared using the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, the preferred method to assess insulin sensitivity; primary end point was the effect on insulin sensitivity during the first 12 weeks.. Twenty-seven subjects completed the study. In the DRV/r arm (n=14), median glucose disposal from baseline through weeks 12 and 48 was 9.3, 11.4, and 9.9 mg/kg*min, respectively; in the ATV/r arm (n=13), these values were 8.9, 8.6, and 9.1 mg/kg*min, respectively. Median insulin sensitivity in the DRV/r arm at baseline, week 12, and week 48 was 24.0, 25.0, and 21.5 mg/kg*min per μIU/mL×100, respectively; these values in the ATV/r arm were 20.7, 22.0, and 22.0 mg/kg*min per μIU/mL×100, respectively. Most subjects had ≥1 adverse event, including three serious adverse events (n=2 [DRV/r], n=1 [ATV/r]).. DRV/r and ATV/r displayed similar modest effects on insulin sensitivity using a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Viral Load; Young Adult

To report the 96 week results on efficacy, safety and bone mineral density (BMD) in subjects with HIV-1 that were virologically suppressed and treated with atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus atazanavir/ritonavir triple therapy.. MODAt is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized, 96 week trial (NCT01511809) comparing efficacy of atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus atazanavir/ritonavir triple therapy. Treatment success was defined as no occurrence of confirmed viral rebound (two consecutive HIV-RNA >50 copies/mL) or discontinuation for any cause of the ongoing regimen.. The 96 week treatment success was 64% in the atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm and 63% in the triple-therapy arm (difference 1.3%, 95% CI: -17.5 to 20.1). In the atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm, no PI- or NRTI-associated resistance mutations were observed at virological failure and all patients re-suppressed after re-intensification. In the monotherapy arm, treatment failure was more frequent in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus [64% versus 28% (difference 35.4%, 95% CI: 3.7-67.2)]. Drug-related adverse events leading to discontinuation were 3 (6%) in the atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm and 11 (21.5%) in the triple-therapy arm (P = 0.041). The 96 week adjusted mean percentage change in total proximal femur (not at lumbar spine) BMD was +1.16% and -1.64% in the atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm and the triple-therapy arm, respectively (P = 0.012).. The 96 week analyses suggested that long-term efficacy of atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy was inferior as compared with atazanavir/ritonavir triple therapy, particularly when administered in subjects coinfected with hepatitis C virus. In the atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm, reintroduction of nucleosides, as needed, was always effective with no new resistance mutation; monotherapy was also associated with a lower incidence of adverse events and improvement in femur BMD.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Bone Density; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

Standard-of-care antiretroviral therapy (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection uses a combination of drugs, until now considered essential to minimise treatment failure and development of drug resistance. Protease inhibitors (PIs) are potent with a high genetic barrier to resistance and have the potential for use as monotherapy after viral load (VL) suppression achieved on combination therapy. However, longer-term resistance and toxicity risks are uncertain.. To compare the effectiveness, toxicity profile and cost-effectiveness of PI monotherapy with those of standard-of-care triple therapy in a pragmatic long-term clinical trial.. Open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.. Forty-three HIV clinical centres in the UK NHS.. HIV-positive adults taking standard combination ART with a suppressed VL for ≥ 6 months.. Patients were randomised to maintain ongoing triple therapy (OT) or switch to a strategy of physician-selected ritonavir-boosted PI monotherapy (PI-mono), with prompt return to combination therapy in the event of VL rebound.. The primary outcome was reduction of future drug options, defined as new intermediate-/high-level resistance to one or more drugs to which the patient's virus was considered to be sensitive at trial entry (non-inferiority comparison, 10% margin). Secondary outcomes included confirmed virological rebound, serious drug- or disease-related complications, total grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs), neurocognitive function change, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) cell count change, change in health-related quality of life, cardiovascular risk change, health-care costs and health economic analysis.. In total, 587 participants were randomised (77% male, 68% white) to OT (n = 291) or PI-mono (n = 296) and followed for a median of 44 months, of whom 2.7% withdrew/were lost to follow-up. One or more episodes of confirmed VL rebound were observed in eight patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate 3.2%) in the OT group and 95 patients (35.0%) in the PI-mono group [absolute risk difference 31.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 24.6% to 39.0%; p < 0.001]. PI-mono patients who changed to ART after VL rebound all resuppressed (median 3.5 weeks). The proportions with loss of a future drug option at 3 years were 0.7% in the OT group and 2.1% in the PI-mono group (difference 1.4%, (95% CI -0.4% to 3.4%); non-inferiority demonstrated). There were no significant differences in serious disease complications between groups or in the frequency of grade 3 or 4 clinical AEs (16.8% OT group vs. 22% PI-mono group; absolute risk difference 5.1%, 95% CI -1.3% to 11.5%; p = 0.12). Overall, the PI-mono strategy was shown to be cost-effective compared with OT under most scenarios explored. PI-mono was cost saving because of the large savings in ART drug costs while being no less effective in terms of quality-adjusted life-years in the within-trial analysis and only marginally less effective when extrapolated to lifetime outcomes.. PI monotherapy, with prompt reintroduction of combination therapy for VL rebound, was non-inferior to combination therapy in preserving future treatment options and is an acceptable and cost-effective alternative for long-term management of HIV infection.. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04857074.. This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 21. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; Viral Load

We report the pharmacokinetic interactions of combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing ethinyl estradiol (EE2)/desogestrel (DSG) with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in 16 HIV-positive adolescents.. We measured Ctrough of EE2 and etonogestrel (ENG), the active metabolite of DSG, in HIV-positives on LPV/r-based ART; Ctrough of LPV/r with and without COC; endogenous progesterone. EE2/ENG levels were compared with our own historical data of HIV-negative controls.. Ctrough of EE2 and ENG varied from 3 to 57 pg/mL and from 1051 to 5000 pg/mL, respectively. The geometric mean ratios (GMR) of Ctrough in HIV-positives on LPV/r with COC versus HIV-negative controls with COC only were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.42 to 1.08) or 32% decreased (P = 0.10) for EE2; and 1.08 (95% CI: 0.73 to 1.60) or 8% increased (P = 0.68) for ENG. Endogenous progesterone was <1.0 ng/mL in all participants, consistent with anovulation. Ctrough of LPV decreased statistically insignificantly with COC and remained above the desired therapeutic minimum of 1.0 mg/L in all.. The study found no clinically relevant interaction between EE2/DSG and LPV/r. This was supported by suppressed ovulation, assessed by low endogenous progesterone levels in all participants; and preserved antiretroviral activity, assessed by LPV/r levels above the desired therapeutic minimum in all participants. However, the high variability of hormonal levels warrants individual monitoring and further investigation. Condom use should always be encouraged for infection prevention.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Desogestrel; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Ethinyl Estradiol; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Alternative combination antiretroviral therapies in virologically suppressed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients experiencing side effects and/or at ongoing risk of important comorbidities from current therapy are needed. Maraviroc (MVC), a chemokine receptor 5 antagonist, is a potential alternative component of therapy in those with R5-tropic virus.. The Maraviroc Switch Study is a randomized, multicenter, 96-week, open-label switch study in HIV type 1-infected adults with R5-tropic virus, virologically suppressed on a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) plus double nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (2 N(t)RTI) backbone. Participants were randomized 1:2:2 to current combination antiretroviral therapy (control), or replacing the protease inhibitor (MVC + 2 N(t)RTI arm) or the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone (MVC + PI/r arm) with twice-daily MVC. The primary endpoint was the difference (switch minus control) in proportion with plasma viral load (VL) <200 copies/mL at 48 weeks. The switch arms were judged noninferior if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in the primary endpoint was < -12% in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population.. The ITT population comprised 395 participants (control, n = 82; MVC + 2 N(t)RTI, n = 156; MVC + PI/r, n = 157). Baseline characteristics were well matched. At week 48, noninferior rates of virological suppression were observed in those switching away from a PI/r (93.6% [95% CI, -9.0% to 2.2%] and 91.7% [95% CI, -9.6% to 3.8%] with VL <200 and <50 copies/mL, respectively) compared to the control arm (97.6% and 95.1% with VL <200 and <50 copies/mL, respectively). In contrast, MVC + PI/r did not meet noninferiority bounds and was significantly inferior (84.1% [95% CI, -19.8% to -5.8%] and 77.7% [95% CI, -24.9% to -8.4%] with VL <200 and <50 copies/mL, respectively) to the control arm in the ITT analysis.. These data support MVC as a switch option for ritonavir-boosted PIs when partnered with a 2-N(t)RTI backbone, but not as part of N(t)RTI-sparing regimens comprising MVC with PI/r.. NCT01384682.

Topics: Adult; Comorbidity; Cyclohexanes; Female; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Maraviroc; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Viral Load; Virus Replication

Boosted PIs are commonly prescribed in patients presenting with advanced HIV infection. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or darunavir plus two NRTIs in HIV-1-infected ART-naive patients with severe immunosuppression, targeting at least an 85% success rate at week 48.. This 48 week, open-label, non-comparative, randomized, multicentre trial included ART-naive patients with CD4 cell counts <200 cells/mm(3), with plasma HIV-1 RNA >1000 copies/mL and without genotypic mutations conferring resistance to the study drugs. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir (300/100 mg) or darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine. The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA ≤50 copies/mL at week 48 and no permanent PI/ritonavir discontinuation. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01928407).. One hundred and twenty patients were enrolled: 77% were men, 30% were born in Africa and 39% had AIDS. The median baseline CD4 and plasma HIV-RNA values were 69 cells/mm(3) and 5.4 log10 copies/mL. All but four patients received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine. The week 48 treatment success rate was 66% (95% CI 54%-78%) with atazanavir/ritonavir and 80% (95% CI 68%-89%) with darunavir/ritonavir. The median CD4 cell count increased similarly in the two groups (Δweek 48 to week 0: +194 cells/mm(3)). Adverse events occurred in 23 and 18 patients, respectively.. Despite good adherence, neither study regimen reached the predefined objective, suggesting a need for more potent regimens for patients with advanced HIV infection.

Topics: Adult; Africa; Aged; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nucleosides; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

HIV(+) subjects on optimal antiretroviral therapy have persistently impaired antibody responses to pneumococcal vaccination. We explored the possibility that this effect may be due to HIV protease inhibitors (PIs). We found that in humans and mice, PIs do not affect antibody production in response to pneumococcal vaccination.

Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Bacterial; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Immunoglobulin M; Male; Mice; Pneumococcal Infections; Pneumococcal Vaccines; Ritonavir; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Vaccination

Cognitive function is reported to improve after the initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Data on the evolution of such changes are limited. We assessed the dynamics of changes in cognitive parameters, in HIV-positive subjects initiating cART.. Cognitive function in seven domains was evaluated for HIV-infected patients without clinically significant cognitive impairment prior to the initiation of cART, and 24 and 48 weeks after. Cognitive scores were transformed using standardised z-scores according to the pooled baseline standard deviation. Global, speed, and accuracy composite z-scores were calculated with changes calculated using a paired t test.. In 14 subjects, change in global cognitive z-scores from baseline was by 0.08 at week 24 (p = 0.59) and 0.15 at week 48 (p = 0.43). Change in composite speed and accuracy z-scores from baseline at weeks 24/48 were 0.07/0.05 (p = 0.45/0.82) and 0.13/0.23 (p = 0.47/0.45), respectively. In two of the cognitive domains assessing speed (learning and monitoring time), a continued improvement from baseline to weeks 24 and 48 was observed (changes of 0.06-0.08 and 0.10-0.19, respectively), whereas in two domains (detection and identification) an initial improvement at week 24 (changes of -0.10 and 0.04 from baseline, respectively) was followed by a deterioration in score at week 48 (changes of -0.12 and -0.08 from baseline, respectively). None of these changes were statistically significant.. A trend for improvement in cognitive function was observed in naïve HIV-positive patients starting cART. The dynamics of this improvement differed both between cognitive domains and the time-points assessed.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; Young Adult

To assess whether changes in antiretroviral drugs other than thymidine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) may have a body fat impact in HIV-infected patients with lipoatrophy.. Ninety-six-week phase IV, open-label, multicentre, pilot randomized trial. HIV-infected patients with moderate/severe lipoatrophy at one or more body sites despite long-term thymidine NRTI-free therapy were randomized to continue their efavirenz (EFV)-based antiretroviral regimen or to switch from EFV to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r). The primary endpoint was the absolute change in limb fat mass measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry from baseline to 96 weeks. Changes in other body fat measurements, subjective perception of lipoatrophy, subcutaneous fat gene expression and plasma lipids were also assessed.. Thirty-three patients (73% men, median age 52 years) were recruited. At 96 weeks, absolute limb fat mass increased in the LPV/r arm vs. the EFV arm (estimated difference +1082.1 g; 95% CI +63.7 to +2103.5; P = 0.04); this difference remained significant after adjustment by gender, age, fat mass, body mass index and CD4 cell count at baseline. Subjective lipoatrophy perception scores also improved in the LPV/r arm relative to the EFV arm. Adipogenesis, glucose and lipid metabolism, and mitochondrial gene expression increased in the LPV/r arm compared with the EFV arm at 96 weeks. HDL cholesterol decreased in the LPV/r arm relative to the EFV arm.. Switching from EFV to LPV/r in HIV-infected patients with lipoatrophy may offer further limb fat gain beyond thymidine NRTI discontinuation, although this strategy decreased plasma HDL cholesterol and caused changes in subcutaneous fat gene expression that may be associated with increased insulin resistance.

Topics: Adipogenesis; Adipose Tissue; Alkynes; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Extremities; Female; Gene Expression Regulation; HIV Infections; Humans; Lipid Metabolism; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

HIV antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy is recommended to reduce the risk of mother-to-child transmission and for maternal care. Physiological changes during pregnancy can affect pharmacokinetics. The impact of pregnancy was evaluated for once-daily (qd) darunavir/ritonavir.. HIV-1-infected pregnant women on an antiretroviral regimen that includes darunavir were enrolled in the study and further treated with darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg qd. Plasma concentrations were assessed over 24 h during the second and third trimesters and postpartum using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for total darunavir and ritonavir, and using (14) C-darunavir-fortified plasma for unbound darunavir. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using noncompartmental analysis. Safety and antiviral response were assessed at all visits.. Data were available for 16 women. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC24h ) for total darunavir was 34-35% lower during pregnancy vs. postpartum. Unbound darunavir AUC24h was 20-24% lower during pregnancy vs. postpartum. The minimum plasma concentration of total and unbound darunavir was 32-50% and 13-38% lower, respectively, during pregnancy vs. postpartum. The antiviral response (< 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) was 59% at baseline and increased to 87-100% during the trial; the CD4 count increased over time. One serious adverse event (gestational diabetes) was judged as possibly related to study medication. All 16 infants born to women remaining in the study at delivery were HIV-1 negative (two were premature).. Total darunavir exposure decreased during pregnancy, but the decrease was less for unbound (active) darunavir. These changes are not considered clinically relevant. Darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg qd may therefore be a treatment option for HIV-1-infected pregnant women.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Plasma; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Ritonavir; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Young Adult

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Cognition; Darunavir; Drug Substitution; Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Ritonavir; Sleep

The use of progestogen-only contraceptives may cause a change in bleeding pattern, which is a common cause of discontinuation of these methods. Co-administration with some antiretroviral therapies (ART) changes the bioavailability of the etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing contraceptive implant, possibly affecting the bleeding pattern. Bleeding patterns were evaluated in HIV-positive users of the ENG implant co-administered with two common ART regimens.. Forty-five HIV-positive women who wished to use an ENG implant were included in this study: 15 had received zidovudine/lamivudine (AZT/3TC) + lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) for ≥3 months (LPV/r-based ART group), 15 had received AZT/3TC + efavirenz (EFV) for ≥3 months (EFV-based ART group), and 15 had not received ART (non-ART group). Bleeding patterns were evaluated at 3 and 6 months after implant placement using a standard bleeding calendar.. Amenorrhoea and infrequent bleeding rates were higher in the LPV/r-based ART group (50% and 36%, respectively) than in the other groups (non-ART group, 36% and 29%, respectively; EFV-based ART group, 7% and 14.5%, respectively; p = 0.01). The EFV-based ART group more frequently had regular bleeding (71.5%) compared with the other groups (LPV/r-based ART group, 7%; non-ART group, 21%; p = 0.01). The proportions of women with frequent and prolonged bleeding were similar (p > 0.05) in the three groups.. The co-administration of EFV-based or LPV/r-based ART with the ENG implant affected the expected bleeding patterns during use of the implant, although unfavourable bleeding (frequent and prolonged) was not associated with the medications under evaluation.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Amenorrhea; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Desogestrel; Drug Combinations; Drug Implants; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Metrorrhagia; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Young Adult; Zidovudine

Dyslipidemia as a risk factor of cardiovascular disease is common especially in HIV-infected patients who are using protease inhibitors (PIs) including atazanavir. Pitavastatin has less drug-drug interactions and demonstrable efficacy in decreasing lipid levels in non HIV-infected individuals.. This study was a randomized, double-blind, crossover study comparing the safety and efficacy of pitavastatin vs placebo in HIV-infected patients with dyslipidemia and receiving atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r). Patients were randomized to receive either placebo or pitavastatin for 12 weeks. The follow-up visits were every 4 weeks until the end of the study.. A total of 12 HIV-infected patients were enrolled to each study group. Of all, 14 (58%) patients were men and mean (standard deviation, SD) age was 48.1 (1.8) years. At 12 weeks of treatment with pitavastatin compared to placebo; mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] total cholesterol (TC) was 207 (187.3, 226.8) mg/dL vs 246.3 (226.5, 266) mg/dL (p <0.001); mean (95% CI) triglyceride (TG) was 351.3 (193.2, 509.4) mg/dL vs 279.1 (121, 437.2) mg/dL (p = 0.269); mean (95% CI) high density lipoprotein (HDL) was 45.3 (40.4, 50.2) mg/dL vs 44.2 (39.3, 49.1) mg/dL (p = 0.354); and mean (95% CI) low density lipoprotein (LDL) was 113.2 (100.4, 126) mg/dL vs 145.6 (132.8, 158.4) mg/dL (p <0.001). Mean liver enzyme and median creatine phosphokinase levels were not statistically significant between patients receiving placebo and pitavastatin.. Pitavastatin decreases TC and LDL level at 12 weeks significantly and shows indifferent in hepatotoxicity and creatine phosphokinase levels compared to those of placebo. Thus, pitavastatin can be a good option of lipid-lowering agent in HIV-infected patients who are receiving ATV/r.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02442700.

Topics: Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cholesterol; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Dyslipidemias; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Lipids; Lipoproteins, LDL; Male; Middle Aged; Quinolines; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides

A randomized controlled trial was conducted among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens with hypercholesterolemia. Reduction of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein was significantly greater in patients who were randomized to the addition of atorvastatin compared with those who were switched from lopinavir/ritonavir to atazanavir/ritonavir.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Atorvastatin; Cholesterol; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Lipoproteins, LDL; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir

We investigate if switching from a ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r)-based to an efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen is associated with beneficial bone development.. The CHANGES Bone Study follows HIV-infected children who participated in a noninferiority randomized trial in Johannesburg, South Africa evaluating the safety and efficacy of preemptive switching to efavirenz (n = 106) compared with remaining on LPV/r (n = 113). HIV-uninfected children were also recruited. Whole-body and lumbar spine bone mineral content (BMC) were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at a cross-sectional visit. BMC Z-scores adjusted for sex, age, and height were generated. Physical activity and dietary intake were assessed. CD4 percentage and viral load were measured. We compared bone indices of HIV-infected with HIV-uninfected children and LPV/r with efavirenz by intent-to-treat.. The 219 HIV-infected (52% boys) and 219 HIV-uninfected (55% boys) children were 6.4 and 7.0 years of age, respectively. Mean ART duration for HIV-infected children was 5.7 years. Whole-body BMC Z-score was 0.17 lower for HIV-infected children compared with HIV-uninfected children after adjustment for physical activity, dietary vitamin D and calcium (P = 0.03). Whole-body BMC Z-score was 0.55 higher for HIV-infected children switched to efavirenz compared with those remaining on LPV/r after adjustment for physical activity, dietary vitamin D and calcium, CD4 percentage, and viral load (P < 0.0001).. South African HIV-infected children receiving ART have lower bone mass compared with HIV-uninfected controls. Accrued bone mass is positively associated with switching to efavirenz-based ART compared with remaining on LPV/r, providing additional rationale for limiting LPV/r exposure once viral suppression has been achieved.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Alkynes; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Benzoxazines; Bone and Bones; Bone Development; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Ritonavir; South Africa; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) viral escape is a concern in ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors monotherapy. The aim was to assess HIV-RNA, biomarkers of immune activation and neurodegeneration, and atazanavir concentrations in CSF of patients on successful long-term atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) monotherapy.. This is a substudy of the multicentric, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial monotherapy once a day with atazanavir/ritonavir (NCT01511809), comparing the ongoing ATV/r along with 2 nucleoside retrotranscriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) regimen to a simplified ATV/r monotherapy. Patients with plasma HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL after at least 96 study weeks were eligible.We assessed HIV-RNA, soluble (s)CD14, sCD163, CCL2, CXCL10, interleukin-6, and YKL40 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; neopterin, tryptophan, kynurenine, and neurofilament by immunoassays; and ATV concentrations by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in paired plasma and CSF samples. Variables were compared with Wilcoxon rank-sum or Fisher exact test, as appropriate.. HIV-RNA was detected in the CSF of 1/11 patients on ATV/r monotherapy (114 copies/mL), without neurological symptoms, who was successfully reintensified with his previous 2NRTIs, and in none of the 12 patients on ATV/r + 2NRTIs. CSF biomarkers and ATV concentrations did not differ between the 2 arms.. CSF escape was uncommon in patients on long-term ATV/r monotherapy and was controlled with reintensification.

Topics: Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; Biomarkers; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Pilot Projects; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; Ritonavir; Spinal Puncture; Viral Load

The International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network (IMPAACT) P1060 study demonstrated short-term superiority of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) over nevirapine (NVP) in antiretroviral therapy (ART), regardless of prior NVP exposure. However, NVP-based ART had a marginal benefit in CD4 percentage (CD4%) and growth. We compared 5-year outcomes from this clinical trial.. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected, ART-eligible children were enrolled into 2 cohorts based on prior NVP exposure and randomized to NVP- or LPV/r-based ART. The data safety monitoring board recommended unblinding results in both cohorts due to superiority of LPV/r for the primary endpoint: stopping randomized treatment, virologic failure (VF), or death by 6 months. Participants were offered a switch in regimens (if on NVP) and continued observational follow-up. We compared time to VF or death, death, and CD4% and growth changes using intention-to-treat analyses. Additionally, inverse probability weights were used to account for treatment switching and censoring.. As of September 2014, 329 of the 451 (73%) enrolled participants were still in follow-up (median, 5.3 years; interquartile range [IQR], 4.3-6.4), with 52% on NVP and 88% on LPV/r as originally randomized. NVP arm participants had significantly higher risk of VF or death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.65) but not death alone (aHR, 1.65; 95% CI, .72-3.76) compared with participants randomized to LPV/r. Mean CD4% was significantly higher in the NVP arm up to 1 year after ART initiation, but not beyond. Mean weight-for-age z scores were marginally higher in the NVP arm, but height-for-age z scores did not differ. Similar trends were observed in sensitivity analyses.. These findings support the current World Health Organization recommendation of LPV/r in first-line ART regimens for HIV-infected children.. NCT00307151.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child, Preschool; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lopinavir; Male; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Thai patients with HIV have higher exposure to HIV protease inhibitors than do white people and dose reduction might be possible. We compared the efficacy of low-dose with standard-dose ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in virologically suppressed Thai patients with HIV.. In this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older who were receiving ritonavir-boosted protease-inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) with HIV plasma viral loads of less than 50 copies per mL, an alanine aminotransferase concentration of less than 200 IU/L, and a creatinine clearance of at least 60 mL/min from 14 hospitals in Thailand. We excluded patients who had active AIDS-defining disease or opportunistic infections, had a history of an HIV viral load of 1000 copies per mL or more after 24 weeks of any ritonavir-boosted protease-inhibitor-based ART, used concomitant medications that could interact with the study drugs, were pregnant or lactating, had illnesses that might change the effect of the study drugs, or had a history of sensitivity to the study drugs. A biostatistician at the study coordinating centre randomly allocated patients (1:1) to switch the protease inhibitor for oral atazanavir 200 mg and ritonavir 100 mg or for atazanavir 300 mg and ritonavir 100 mg once daily, both with two nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors at recommended doses. Randomisation was done with a minimisation schedule, stratified by recruiting centre, use of tenofovir, and use of indinavir as a component of the preswitch regimen. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with viral loads of less than 200 copies per mL at week 48, and we followed up patients every 12 weeks. Treatments were open label, the non-inferiority margin was -10%, and all patients who received at least one dose of study medication were analysed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01159223.. Between July 6, 2011, and Dec 23, 2013, we randomly assigned 559 patients: 279 to receive atazanavir 200 mg and ritonavir 100 mg (low dose) and 280 to atazanavir 300 mg and ritonavir 100 mg (standard dose). At week 48, 265 (97·1%) of 273 in the low-dose group and 267 (96·4%) of 277 in the standard-dose group had viral loads of less than 200 copies per mL (difference 0·68; 95% CI -2·29 to 3·65). Seven (3%) of 273 in the low-dose group and 21 (8%) of 277 in the standard-dose group discontinued their assigned treatment (p=0·01). 46 (17%) of 273 participants in the low-dose group and 97 (35%) of 277 in the standard-dose group had total bilirubin grade 3 or higher toxicity (≥3·12 mg/dL; p<0·0001).. A switch to low-dose atazanavir should be recommended for Thai patients with well controlled HIV viraemia while on regimens based on boosted protease inhibitors.. The National Health Security Office and Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity in Society.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pregnancy; Ritonavir; Thailand; Viral Load; Young Adult

The direct-acting antiviral regimen of 25 mg ombitasvir-150 mg paritaprevir-100 mg ritonavir once daily (QD) plus 250 mg dasabuvir twice daily (BID) is approved for the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection, including patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus. This study was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability effects of coadministering the regimen of 3 direct-acting antivirals with two antiretroviral therapies (dolutegravir or abacavir plus lamivudine). Healthy volunteers (n = 24) enrolled in this phase I, single-center, open-label, multiple-dose study received 50 mg dolutegravir QD for 7 days or 300 mg abacavir plus 300 mg lamivudine QD for 4 days, the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen for 14 days, followed by the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen with dolutegravir or abacavir plus lamivudine for 10 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated to compare combination therapy with 3-direct-acting-antiviral or antiretroviral therapy alone, and safety/tolerability were assessed throughout the study. Coadministration of the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen increased the geometric mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the curve (AUC) of dolutegravir by 22% (central value ratio [90% confidence intervals], 1.219 [1.153, 1.288]) and 38% (1.380 [1.295, 1.469]), respectively. Abacavir geometric mean Cmax and AUC values decreased by 13% (0.873 [0.777, 0.979]) and 6% (0.943 [0.901, 0.986]), while those for lamivudine decreased by 22% (0.778 [0.719, 0.842]) and 12% (0.876 [0.821, 0.934]). For the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen, geometric mean Cmax and AUC during coadministration were within 18% of measurements made during administration of the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen alone, although trough concentrations for paritaprevir were 34% (0.664 [0.585, 0.754]) and 27% (0.729 [0.627, 0.847]) lower with dolutegravir and abacavir-lamivudine, respectively. All study treatments were generally well tolerated, with no evidence of increased rates of adverse events during combination administration. These data indicate that the 3-direct-acting-antiviral regimen can be administered with dolutegravir or abacavir plus lamivudine without dose adjustment.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Female; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Lamivudine; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Piperazines; Proline; Pyridones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

In a multicentre, open-label, clinical trial, 43 patients virologically suppressed while receiving a standard triple antiretroviral therapy were randomized (1:1:1) to switch to monotherapy with darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r-MT arm), monotherapy with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r-MT arm) or to continue on the ongoing regimen (cART arm). The proportion (95% CI) of patients with virological success (Snapshot analysis) at week 48 was 73% (48%-90%) in the DRV/r-MT arm, 69% (42%-88%) in the LPV/r-MT arm and 87% (61%-98%) in the cART arm. Virological failure was detected in only one patient receiving LPV/r-MT. The LPV/r-MT arm showed a modest worsening in lipid profile.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir

Women are under-represented in HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) studies. Guidelines for selection of ART as initial therapy in patients with HIV-1 infection do not contain sex-specific treatment. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the single tablet integrase inhibitor regimen containing elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate compared with a boosted protease inhibitor regimen of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.. In this international, randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study (Women AntiretroViral Efficacy and Safety study [WAVES]), we recruited treatment-naive HIV-infected women with an estimated creatinine clearance of 70 mL/min or higher from 80 centres in 11 countries. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (integrase inhibitor regimen) or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (protease inhibitor based regimen); regimens were masked with matching placebos. Randomisation was done by a computer-generated allocation sequence (block size four) and was stratified by HIV-1 RNA viral load and race. Investigators, patients, study staff, and those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment group. All participants who received one dose of study drug were included in the primary efficacy and safety analyses. The main outcome was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at week 48 as defined by US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm (prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12%). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01705574.. Between Nov 28, 2012, and March 12, 2014, 575 women were enrolled. 289 were randomly assigned to receive the integrase inhibitor regimen and 286 to receive the protease inhibitor based regimen. 252 (87%) women in the integrase inhibitor group had plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at week 48 compared with 231 (81%) women in the protease inhibitor group (adjusted difference 6·5%; 95% CI 0·4-12·6). No participant had virological failure with resistance in the integrase inhibitor group compared with three participants ([1%]; all Met184Val/Ile) in the protease inhibitor group. 19 women in the protease inhibitor group discontinued because of adverse events compared with five in the integrase inhibitor group.. WAVES shows that clinical trials of ART regimens in global and diverse populations of treatment-naive women are possible. The findings support guidelines recommending integrase inhibitor based regimens in first-line antiretroviral therapy.. Gilead Sciences.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cobicistat; Double-Blind Method; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; International Cooperation; Quinolones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Viral Load

Diminished growth is highly prevalent among HIV-infected children and might be improved by antiretroviral therapy (ART). We examined growth recovery in a rural Ugandan cohort of HIV-infected children randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or non nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor-based ART.. HIV-infected children 2 months to 6 years of age were randomized to LPV/r- or non nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor-based ART. Changes in weight-for-age (WAZ), height-for-age (HAZ) and weight-for-height Z-scores for 24 months were evaluated using generalized linear repeated measures models. Recovery from being underweight (WAZ<-2), stunted (HAZ<-2) and wasted (weight-for-height <-2) to Z-scores greater than -2 was also compared by arm using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard modeling.. A total of 129 children with median age of 3 years initiated therapy; 64 received LPV/r-based and 65 non nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor-based ART (nevirapine: 36 and efavirenz: 29). The median (interquartile range) difference in growth measures between baseline and 24 months for LPV/r (n = 45) versus non nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor-based therapy (n = 40) were as follows: WAZ, 0.47 (0.10, 1.62) versus 0.53 (0.03, 1.14) (P = 0.59) and HAZ, median 1.55 (0.78, 1.86) versus 1.19 (0.62, 1.65) (P = 0.23), respectively. ART regimen was not predictive of change in WAZ (β: -0.02, 95% confidence interval: -0.25, 0.20) or HAZ (β: 0.05, 95% confidence interval: -0.10, 0.19). The presence of confirmed virologic failure was not associated with growth.. Most ART-naive children experienced recovery of both WAZ and HAZ over the 24 months after ART initiation, with no significant difference between those receiving LPV/r versus non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based ART. However, the persistence of median Z-scores below 0 underscores the need for additional strategies to improve growth outcomes in HIV+ African children.

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Body Height; Body Weight; Child, Preschool; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Lopinavir; Male; Ritonavir

The aim of this study was to compare an in-person, group-based behavioral weight loss intervention to technology-based interventions in adults with obesity.. Adults (. Findings provide initial information on the use of technology-based interventions that include wearable devices combined with brief monthly telephone calls for weight loss in adults with obesity.. A highly stable amino-coordinated metal-organic framework ZJU-198 has been synthesized and structurally characterized, exhibiting high CO. The use of statins in SLE reduced the serum lipid and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, which suggests a role for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Statins did not affect the SLEDAI score, and therefore their use for modifying SLE disease activity levels is not presently supported.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Air Pollutants; Alkynes; Alleles; Animals; Anthracenes; Anthraquinones; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Black or African American; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; C-Reactive Protein; Calcium, Dietary; Capsid Proteins; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated; Cardiovascular Diseases; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol; Collagen Type I; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Echocardiography; Emtricitabine; Epitopes; Female; Femur Neck; Gene Expression Profiling; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Hepatitis, Viral, Animal; Hip Joint; HIV Infections; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Immunization; Inflammation Mediators; Lipoproteins, LDL; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Nitrates; Osteocalcin; Oxidation-Reduction; Parathyroid Hormone; Parvovirus B19, Human; Peptides; Phenotype; Pilot Projects; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sodium Chloride; Tenofovir; Transcriptome; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Vaccines; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Vitamin D; Young Adult

To access the costs of care for Ivoirian children before and after initiating LPV/r-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) before the age of two.. We assessed the direct costs of care for all HIV-infected children over the first 12 months on LPV/r-based ART initiated <2 years of age in Abidjan. We recorded all drug prescriptions, ART and cotrimoxazole prophylaxis delivery, medical analyses/examinations and hospital admissions. We compared these costs to those accrued in the month prior to ART initiation. Costs and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were estimated per child-month, according to severe morbidity.. Of the 114 children screened, 99 initiated LPV/r-based ART at a median age of 13.5 months (IQR: 6.8-18.6); 45% had reached World Health Organization stage 3 or 4. During the first 12 months on ART, 5% died and 3% were lost to follow-up. In the month before ART initiation, the mean cost of care per child-month reached $123.39 (95%CI:$121.02-$125.74). After ART initiation, it was $42.53 (95%CI:$42.15-$42.91); 50% were ART costs. The remaining costs were non-antiretroviral drugs (18%) and medical analyses/examinations (14%). Mean costs were significantly higher within the first three months on ART ($48.76, 95%CI:$47.95-$49.56) and in children experiencing severe morbidity ($49.76, 95%CI:$48.61-50.90).. ART reduces the overall monthly cost of care of HIV-infected children < 2 years. Because children were treated at an advanced HIV disease stage, the additional costs of treating severe morbidity on ART remain substantial. Strategies for treating HIV-infected children as early as possible must remain a priority in Côte d'Ivoire.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Anti-HIV Agents; Cote d'Ivoire; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Health Care Costs; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Lost to Follow-Up; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Survival Rate

HIV and malaria geographically overlap. HIV protease inhibitors kill malaria parasites in vitro and in vivo, but further evaluation in clinical studies is needed.. Thirty-one children from Malawi aged 4-62 months were followed every 3 months and at intercurrent illness visits for ≤47 months (September 2009-December 2011). We compared malaria parasite carriage by blood smear microscopy (BS) and confirmed clinical malaria incidence (CCM, or positive BS with malaria symptoms) in children initiated on HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) with zidovudine, lamivudine, and either nevirapine (NVP), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, or lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV-rtv), a protease inhibitor.. We found an association between increased time to recurrent positive BS, but not CCM, when anti-malarial treatment and LPV-rtv based ART were used concurrently and when accounting for a LPV-rtv and antimalarial treatment interaction (adjusted HR 0.39; 95% CI (0.17,0.89); p = 0.03).. LPV-rtv in combination with malaria treatment was associated with lower risk of recurrent positive BS, but not CCM, in HIV-infected children. Larger, randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings which may permit ART optimization for malaria-endemic settings.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00719602.

Topics: Antimalarials; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child; Child, Preschool; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Malaria, Falciparum; Malawi; Male; Nevirapine; Plasmodium falciparum; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Viral Load; Zidovudine

As the HIV-infected population ages, the role of cellular senescence and inflammation on co-morbid conditions and pharmacotherapy is increasingly of interest. p16INK4a expression, a marker for aging and senescence in T-cells, is associated with lower intracellular concentrations of endogenous nucleotides (EN) and nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). This study expands on these findings by determining whether inflammation is contributing to the association of p16INK4a expression with intracellular metabolite (IM) exposure and endogenous nucleotide concentrations.. Samples from 73 HIV-infected adults receiving daily tenofovir/emtricitabine (TFV/FTC) with either efavirenz (EFV) or atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) were tested for p16INK4a expression, and plasma cytokine and intracellular drug concentrations. Associations between p16INK4a expression and cytokine concentrations were assessed using maximum likelihood methods, and elastic net regression was applied to assess whether cytokines were predictive of intracellular metabolite/endogenous nucleotide exposures.. Enrolled participants had a median age of 48 years (range 23-73). There were no significant associations between p16INK4a expression and cytokines. Results of the elastic net regression showed weak relationships between IL-1Ra and FTC-triphosphate and deoxyadenosine triphosphate exposures, and MIP-1β, age and TFV-diphosphate exposures.. In this clinical evaluation, we found no relationships between p16INK4a expression and cytokines, or cytokines and intracellular nucleotide concentrations. While inflammation is known to play a role in this population, it is not a major contributor to the p16INK4a association with decreased IM/EN exposures in these HIV-infected participants.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Biomarkers; Cellular Senescence; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16; Cytokines; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Inflammation; Male; Middle Aged; Nucleotides; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Young Adult

The virological efficacy of switching from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r)- to a raltegravir (RAL)-containing regimen remains controversial according to the results of SWITCHMRK and SPIRAL studies. The aim of this analysis is to assess the impact of prior resistance mutations to nucleos(t)ides and other potential factors on the virological outcome.. This was a substudy of the prospective, open-label, multicentre SPIRAL study. Demographic, virological variables, prior episodes of virological failures (VF) and archived resistance mutations to nucleos(t)ides were identified from databases and its impact measured by genotypic sensitive scores (GSS) according to the genotypic resistance interpretation algorithm from the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database on outcome was analysed.. Of 250 patients (128 RAL and 122 PI/r) included in the main SPIRAL study, 74 (30%) had previous VF with prior genotypic resistance tests (GRT). Median time of virological suppression prior to inclusion in SPIRAL study was 63.5 months. GSS for backbone nucleos(t)ides was <1 in 15/38 (39%) in the RAL arm and in 9/36 (25%) in the PI/r arm (P=0.13). Among those with nucleos(t)ides GSS <1, 0/15 (0%) in the RAL versus 2/9 (22%) in the PI/r arm developed VF (P=0.13). Moreover 0/11 subjects with null or residual (GSS≤0.5) backbone activity developed VF in the RAL arm.. The 48-week virological efficacy of switching from a PI/r to RAL in subjects with long-term virological suppression was not compromised by a reduction of the nucleos(t)ide backbone activity.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Viral Load

We studied the effect of pregnancy on atazanavir pharmacokinetics in the presence and absence of tenofovir.. This was a non-randomized, open-label, multicentre Phase IV study in HIV-infected pregnant women recruited from European HIV treatment centres. HIV-infected pregnant women treated with boosted atazanavir (300/100 mg or 400/100 mg atazanavir/ritonavir) as part of their combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) were included in the study. 24 h pharmacokinetic curves were recorded in the third trimester and postpartum. Collection of a cord blood and maternal sample at delivery was optional.. 31 patients were included in the analysis, 21/31 patients used tenofovir as part of cART. Median (range) gestational age at delivery was 39 weeks (36-42). Approaching delivery 81% (25 patients) had an HIV viral load <50 copies/ml, all <1,000 copies/ml. Least squares means ratios (90% CI) of atazanavir pharmacokinetic parameters third trimester/postpartum were: 0.66 (0.57, 0.75) for AUC0-24h, 0.70 (0.61, 0.80) for Cmax and 0.59 (0.48, 0.72) for C24h. No statistical difference in pharmacokinetic parameters was found between patients using tenofovir versus no tenofovir. None of the patients showed atazanavir concentrations <0.15 mg/l (target for treatment-naive patients). One baby had a congenital abnormality, which was not likely to be related to atazanavir/ritonavir use. None of the children were HIV-infected.. Despite 34% lower atazanavir exposure during pregnancy, atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once daily generates effective concentrations for protease inhibitor (PI)-naive patients, even if co-administered with tenofovir. For treatment-experienced patients (with relevant PI resistance mutations) therapeutic drug monitoring of atazanavir should be considered to adapt the atazanavir/ritonavir dose on an individual basis.
 ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00825929.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Area Under Curve; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Infant HIV-1 infection is associated with impaired neurologic and motor development. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has the potential to improve developmental outcomes but the relative contributions of pre-ART disease status, growth, treatment regimen and ART response during infancy are unknown.. Kenyan ART-naive infants <5-months old initiated ART and had monthly assessment of age of full neck control, unsupported walking and monosyllabic speech during 24 months of follow-up. Pre-ART and post-ART correlates of age at milestone attainment were evaluated using t tests or multivariate linear regression.. Among 99 infants, pre-ART correlates of later milestone attainment included: underweight and stunted (neck control, walking and speech, all P values <0.05), missed prevention of mother-to-child transmission (P = 0.04) (neck control), previous hospitalization, World Health Organization (WHO) Stage III/IV, low CD4 count, and wasting (speech and walking, all P values <0.05), and low maternal CD4 (speech, P = 0.04). Infants initiated ART at a median of 14 days following enrollment. Infants receiving nevirapinevs lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART attained later speech (18.1 vs. 15.5 months, P = 0.003) [corrected]. Adjusting for pre-ART level, lower 6-month gain in CD4% was associated with later walking (0.18 months earlier per unit increase in CD4%; P = 0.004) and speech (0.12 months earlier per unit increase in CD4%; P = 0.05), and lower 6-month gains in weight-for-age (P = 0.009), height-for-age (P = 0.03) and weight-for-height (P = 0.02) were associated with later walking.. In HIV-infected infants, compromised pre-ART immune and growth status, poor post-ART immune and growth responses, and use of nevirapine- vs. lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART were each associated with later milestone attainment [corrected]. The long-term consequences of these delays are unknown.

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Child Development; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Kenya; Lopinavir; Male; Nevirapine; Ritonavir

We sought to evaluate the effects of antiretroviral therapy on skeletal metabolism in Chinese individuals with human immunodeficiency virus. Patients switched to tenofovir/lamivudine + lopinavir/ritonavir after treatment failure had an increase in bone resorption marker levels by nearly 60%, which is greater than the magnitude previously described in non-Chinese populations.. Few studies have evaluated the effects of antiretroviral therapy on skeletal metabolism in Asian populations infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).. We performed a secondary analysis of bone turnover markers (BTM) at baseline and 2 years in stored plasma samples collected from 2/2009 to 1/2013 as part of a multi-center trial. Two groups were compared: (1) treatment-naïve patients initiated on zidovudine (AZT)/lamivudine (3TC) plus nevirapine (NVP) and (2) patients who failed first-line therapy and were switched to tenofovir (TDF)/3TC plus lopinavir/ritonavir (LPVr). Tests included the bone resorption marker, C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type-1 collagen (CTX), and the bone formation marker procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP).. In the TDF/3TC + LPVr group, samples were available from 59 patients at baseline and 56 patients at 2 years. Of these, 36 patients had samples available from both time points. In the AZT/3TC + NVP group, plasma samples were analyzed from 82 participants at baseline and of those, 61 had samples at 2 years. Median change over 2 years was greater in the TDF/3TC + LPVr group for both CTX (+0.24 ng/mL, interquartile ranges (IQR) 0.10-0.43 vs. +0.09 ng/mL, IQR -0.03 to 0.18, p = 0.001) and P1NP (+25.5 ng/mL, IQR 2.4-51.3 vs. +7.11 ng/mL, IQR -4.3 to 21.6, p = 0.012). Differences remained after adjusting for potential confounders in the multivariable analysis.. Switching to TDF/3TC + LPVr after treatment failure resulted in greater increases in BTMs than initiation with AZT/3TC + NVP in Chinese patients with HIV. Following this change, bone resorption marker levels increased by nearly 60 %, which is greater than the 25-35% increase from baseline described previously in non-Chinese populations. Further studies are warranted to elucidate these findings.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Biomarkers; Bone Remodeling; Bone Resorption; Collagen Type I; Drug Combinations; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Young Adult

Although second-line generic antiretroviral drugs are of great value in developing countries there are concerns regarding their quality and safety. This study is a case report and pharmacological study in healthy volunteers. A French subject of sub-saharan origin who visited Republic of Congo received a post-exposure treatment with AZT+3TC and LPV/r (200/50 mg, Arga-L®, India) following unprotected sexual intercourse. Two days later, in France, tests showed that plasma concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir were undetectable. The WHO prequalification list showed Arga-L® was not prequalified. A pharmacological study in healthy volunteers evaluated oral bioavailability: plasma concentrations of generic LPV/r Arga-L® and LPV/r Kaletra® (400/100 mg) were measured after one single dose at 7 days apart in four healthy volunteers. Concentrations of Arga-L® at 12 h after intake were considerably lower than those of Kaletra®, revealing very low oral bioavailability of generic lopinavir and ritonavir (<10%) compared to the brand-name drug. We found that Arga-L®, despite having adequate qualitative and quantitative drug contents, had very poor bio availability compared to Kaletra®. In order to avoid the selection and the spread of drug-resistant HIV strains, rigorous pharmacological monitoring of generic antiretroviral drugs that are not pre-qualified by WHO, but are marketed in Africa, must be a priority for health authorities.

Topics: Africa; Commerce; Congo; Developing Countries; Drug Approval; Drug Combinations; Drugs, Generic; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Ritonavir; Therapeutic Equivalency; World Health Organization

To assess the influence of body weight and missed doses on lopinavir pharmacokinetics with standard and increased doses of lopinavir/ritonavir melt extrusion tablets during late pregnancy.. Lopinavir concentration data during the third trimester of pregnancy were pooled from clinical trials in Thailand (NCT00409591) and the USA (NCT00042289). A total of 154 HIV-infected pregnant women receiving either 400/100 mg (standard) or 600/150 mg (increased) twice daily had lopinavir plasma concentration data available. Population parameters were estimated using non-linear mixed-effects regression models. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of achieving target lopinavir trough concentrations (>1.0 mg/L) with standard and increased doses of lopinavir/ritonavir during pregnancy.. The median (range) age, weight and gestational age were 28 years (18-43), 62 kg (45-123) and 33 weeks (29-38), respectively. Body weight influenced lopinavir oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F). Population estimates of lopinavir CL/F and V/F were 6.21 L/h/70 kg and 52.6 L/70 kg, respectively. Based on simulations, the highest risk of subtherapeutic trough concentrations was for women weighing >100 kg using the standard dose (∼ 7%), while the risk was <2% with the 600/150 mg dose for women weighing 40-130 kg. After a missed dose, 61% of women have lopinavir concentrations below target prior to the next dose with the standard dose compared with 42% with the increased dose.. Standard dosing provides adequate lopinavir trough concentrations for the majority of pregnant women but increased doses may be preferable for women weighing >100 kg and with a history of lopinavir/ritonavir use and/or adherence issues.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Body Weight; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lopinavir; Monte Carlo Method; Plasma; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Thailand; Treatment Outcome; United States; Young Adult

Co-treatment of HIV and TB in young children is complicated by limited treatment options and complex drug-drug interactions. Rifabutin is an alternative to rifampicin for adults receiving a ritonavir-boosted PI. We aimed to evaluate the short-term safety and pharmacokinetics of rifabutin when given with lopinavir/ritonavir in children.. We conducted an open-label study of rifabutin dosed at 5 mg/kg three times a week in HIV-infected children≤5 years of age receiving lopinavir/ritonavir. Intensive steady-state pharmacokinetic sampling was conducted after six doses. The Division of AIDS 2004, clarification 2009, table for grading severity of adverse events was used to classify drug toxicities. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01259219.. Six children completed the study prior to closure by institutional review boards. The median (range) AUC0-48 of rifabutin was 6.91 (3.52-8.67) μg · h/mL, the median (range) Cmax of rifabutin was 0.39 (0.19-0.46) μg/mL, the median (range) AUC0-48 of 25-O-desacetyl rifabutin was 5.73 (2.85-9.13) μg · h/mL and the median (range) Cmax of 25-O-desacetyl rifabutin was 0.17 (0.08-0.32) μg/mL. The neutrophil count declined in all children; two children experienced grade 4 neutropenia, which resolved rapidly without complications. There was strong correlation between AUC0-48 measures and neutrophil counts.. Rifabutin dosed at 5 mg/kg three times per week resulted in lower AUC0-48, AUC0-24 and Cmax values for rifabutin and 25-O-desacetyl rifabutin compared with adults receiving 150 mg of rifabutin daily, the current recommended dose. We observed high rates of severe transient neutropenia, possibly due to immaturity of CYP3A4 in young children. It remains unclear whether a safe and effective rifabutin dose exists for treatment of TB in children receiving lopinavir/ritonavir.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antitubercular Agents; Area Under Curve; Child, Preschool; Coinfection; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis

Combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) is now the global standard for HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women at all CD4⁺ cell counts. We compared the efficacy and safety of an efavirenz versus lopinavir/ritonavir regimen for HIV-infected pregnant women initiating ART in rural Uganda.. Randomized clinical trial.. We performed a planned secondary analysis comparing viral load suppression (HIV-1 RNA ≤400 copies/ml), safety, and HIV transmission to infants in a trial designed to test the hypothesis that lopinavir/ritonavir versus efavirenz-based ART would reduce placental malaria (PROMOTE, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00993031). HIV-infected, ART-naive pregnant women at 12-28 weeks gestation and any CD4⁺ cell count were randomized. ART was provided and participants were counseled to breastfeed for 1 year postpartum.. The median age of the 389 study participants was 29 years; median CD4⁺ cell count was 370 cells/μl. At delivery, virologic suppression was 97.6% in the efavirenz arm and 86.0% in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm (P < 0.001). At 48 weeks postpartum, 91.0% of women on efavirenz and 88.4% on lopinavir/ritonavir had viral suppression (P = 0.49). Grade 1 or 2 gastrointestinal adverse events were higher among women on lopinavir/ritonavir versus efavirenz. Only two infants acquired HIV (both in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm), and HIV-free infant survival was similar between study arms: 92.9% (lopinavir/ritonavir) versus 97.2% (efavirenz) (P = 0.10).. Virologic suppression at delivery was higher with an efavirenz versus lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen. However, women in both arms achieved high levels of virologic suppression through 1 year postpartum and the risk of transmission to infants was low.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Breast Feeding; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lopinavir; Malaria; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Ritonavir; Uganda; Viral Load

Following antiretroviral therapy failure, patients are often treated with a three-drug regimen that includes two nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitors [N(t)RTIs]. An alternative two-drug nucleoside-sparing regimen may decrease the pill burden and drug toxicities associated with the use of N(t)RTIs. The Intelence aNd pRezista Once A Day Study (INROADS; NCT01199939) evaluated the nucleoside-sparing regimen of etravirine 400 mg with darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once-daily in HIV-1-infected treatment-experienced subjects or treatment-naïve subjects with transmitted resistance.. In this exploratory phase 2b, single-arm, open-label, multicentre, 48-week study, the primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects who achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 48 [confirmed virological response (CVR), non-virological failure (VF) censored]. Key secondary endpoints included assessments of changes from baseline to week 48 in viral load, immunological response, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, safety, tolerability, metabolic and bone markers and body fat.. Forty-one of the 54 enrolled subjects completed the study. Adverse events (7%) and VF (7%) were the most common reasons for discontinuation. The week 48 CVR rate in the intent-to-treat (ITT) non-VF censored population was 89% (primary endpoint). Seven subjects experienced VF. Common adverse events were diarrhoea (15%), rash (15%) and upper respiratory tract infection (11%). Mild/moderate lipid elevations, minimal changes in limb fat distribution and bone mineral density and no clinically relevant changes in glucose metabolism were observed.. Etravirine 400 mg and darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg as a two-drug once-daily regimen in treatment-experienced subjects or treatment-naïve subjects with transmitted resistance was virologically efficacious and well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Body Fat Distribution; Bone Density; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

This observational study in antiretroviral treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected adults explored the efficacy of etravirine plus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV group; n = 999) vs. etravirine plus an alternative boosted protease inhibitor (other PI group; n = 116) using pooled European cohort data.. Two international (EuroSIDA; EUResist Network) and five national (France, Italy, Spain, Switzerland and UK) cohorts provided data (collected in 2007-2012). Stratum-adjusted (for confounding factors) Mantel-Haenszel differences in virological responses (viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived.. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups except for previous use of antiretrovirals (≥ 10: 63% in the DRV group vs. 49% in the other PI group), including previous use of at least three PIs (64% vs. 53%, respectively) and mean number of PI resistance mutations (2.3 vs. 1.9, respectively). Week 24 responses were 73% vs. 75% (observed) and 49% vs. 43% (missing = failure), respectively. Week 48 responses were 75% vs. 73% and 32% vs. 30%, respectively. All 95% CIs around unadjusted and adjusted differences encompassed 0 (difference in responses) or 1 (ORs). While ORs by cohort indicated heterogeneity in response, for pooled data the difference between unadjusted and adjusted for cohort ORs was small.. These data do not indicate a difference in response between the DRV and other PI groups, although caution should be applied given the small size of the other PI group and the lack of randomization. This suggests that the efficacy and virology results from DUET can be extrapolated to a regimen of etravirine with a boosted PI other than darunavir/ritonavir.

Topics: CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; France; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Italy; Male; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Odds Ratio; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; Spain; Sulfonamides; Switzerland; United Kingdom; Viral Load

The objective of this study was to assess whether a lower dose than the currently used one of darunavir/ritonavir might achieve good CSF concentrations and contribute to inhibition of CNS viral replication.. This was a substudy of a randomized, open, multicentre study (eudraCT 2011-006272-39), comparing the efficacy and safety of 800/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir (darunavir 800) versus 600/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir (darunavir 600) once daily plus tenofovir/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine in 100 virologically suppressed patients. Paired blood and CSF samples were obtained. Total plasma darunavir concentrations were determined by HPLC, and CSF concentrations by liquid chromatography-tandem MS. Viral load (VL) was determined in plasma and CSF (limit of detection = 40 copies/mL) by PCR.. Sixteen patients were enrolled. The median (range) of darunavir CSF concentrations in darunavir 600 (n = 8) and darunavir 800 (n = 8) patients was 17.08 (5.79-30.19) and 13.23 (3.47-32.98) ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.916). The median (range) darunavir CSF:plasma ratio was 0.010 (0.005-0.022) in darunavir 600 patients and 0.008 (0.004-0.017) in the darunavir 800 arm (P = 0.370). All 16 patients had a VL < 40 copies/mL in plasma and 14 had a VL < 40 copies/mL in CSF. Of the two patients with detectable CSF VL (280 copies/mL and 159 copies/mL), one was receiving darunavir 600 and the other darunavir 800 plus tenofovir/emtricitabine. Of note, these patients had the lowest CSF darunavir concentrations in their respective groups: 5.79 ng/mL (802 ng/mL in plasma) and 3.47 ng/mL (958 ng/mL in plasma).. Darunavir CSF and plasma concentrations were comparable between the two arms. However, one patient from each group (with the lowest CSF darunavir concentrations in their respective groups) had detectable CSF VL despite undetectable plasma VL.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Cerebrospinal Fluid; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Chromatography, Liquid; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Plasma; Ritonavir; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Viral Load; Viremia; Young Adult

We conducted an open-label, steady-state pharmacokinetic (PK) study of drug-drug interactions between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and twice-daily lopinavir (LPV) plus low-dose ritonavir (RTV) (LPV/r) among 24 HIV-infected women and compared the results to those for HIV-infected women receiving DMPA while on no antiretroviral therapy or on nucleosides only (n = 14 subjects from the control arm of AIDS Clinical Trials Group [ACTG] study 5093). The objectives of the study were to address the effect of LPV/r on DMPA and to address the effect of DMPA on LPV/r therapy. PK parameters were estimated using noncompartmental analysis with between-group comparisons of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) PKs and within-subject comparisons of LPV and RTV PKs before and 4 weeks after DMPA dosing. Plasma progesterone concentrations were measured every 2 weeks after DMPA dosing through week 12. Although the MPA area under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentration of drug in plasma were statistically significantly increased in the study women on LPV/r compared to those in the historical controls, these increases were not considered clinically significant. There were no changes in LPV or RTV exposure after DMPA. DMPA was well tolerated, and suppression of ovulation was maintained. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01296152.).

Topics: Adolescent; Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Middle Aged; Ovulation; Progesterone; Ritonavir; Young Adult

Non-conventional strategies with nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing regimens in antiretroviral naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) -infected patients have been explored in clinical trials. A prospective, open-label, randomized (1:1), multicentre, proof-of-concept trial (VEMAN study, EUDRACT number 2008-006287-11) was conducted assigning HIV-infected naive patients to once-daily maraviroc plus lopinavir/ritonavir (MVC group) or to tenofovir/emtricitabine plus lopinavir/ritonavir (TDF/FTC group). Clinical and laboratory data were collected at baseline, and after 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks with the objective to evaluate the 48-week virological and immunological efficacy. HIV-1 DNA load and CD4(+) T-cell subsets were analysed on frozen peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected at baseline, 4 and 48 weeks to explore the trend in HIV reservoirs. Fifty patients were randomized and included in the analysis. During follow up, HIV-1 RNA decreased similarly in both groups and, at week 48, all patients in the MVC group and 22/24 (96%) in the TDF/FTC group had < 50 copies/ml of HIV-1 RNA. CD4(+) trend during follow up was higher in maraviroc-treated patients (MVC group: 286 (183-343) versus TDF/FTC group: 199 (125-285); Mann-Whitney U-test: p 0.033). A significant 48-week increase of CCR5(+) CD4(+) T cells and CD4(+) effector memory cells was observed among maraviroc-treated patients (Wilcoxon signed rank test: p 0.016 and p 0.007, respectively). No significant variations were found in naive and central memory CD4(+) T cells. Among naive patients with an R5 virus, treatment with maraviroc and lopinavir/ritonavir was shown to provide a virological response compared to a triple therapy and a greater immunological benefit.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclohexanes; DNA, Viral; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Maraviroc; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Viral Load

ARIEL (Darunavir in treatment-experienced pediatric population) was a phase II, open-label study assessing safety and antiviral activity of darunavir/ritonavir twice daily with an optimized background regimen (OBR) in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected pediatric patients (3 to <6 years, weighing 10 to <20 kg).. The study consisted of an initial 4-week screening period, 48 weeks of treatment and a 4-week follow-up period. Patients initially received darunavir/ritonavir 20/3 mg/kg twice-daily for 2 weeks. Following review of pharmacokinetic, safety and antiviral data, the doses of darunavir/ritonavir were adjusted to 25/3 mg/kg twice-daily for patients <15 kg, and 375/50 mg twice-daily for patients 15 to <20 kg.. Of the 34 patients screened, 21 were treated (median treatment duration 48.6 weeks). Darunavir plus an OBR was well tolerated over 48 weeks, with no new safety concerns, and a comparable safety profile to that seen in older children and adults. All treatment-emergent lipid-related and glucose-related laboratory abnormalities were grade 1 or 2. At week 48, 17 of 21 patients (81.0%) had a confirmed virologic response (intent-to-treat, time-to-loss of virologic response). Improvements in height and weight were seen during the study.. No new safety concerns were observed over a 48 week period. These results led to lowering the age to 3 years at which darunavir/ritonavir is indicated for use in treatment-experienced pediatric patients. This study also established doses of darunavir to use in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients aged 3 to <6 years. A high virologic response was observed with this dose. No development of resistance was observed in patients who experienced virologic failure.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Ritonavir

To determine the durability over 96 weeks of safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and raltegravir (RAL) which was demonstrated to have non-inferior efficacy relative to a regimen of LPV/r with nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N(t)RTIs) (Control) in primary analysis at 48 weeks.. Open label, centrally randomised trial.. Recruitment was from 37 primary and secondary care sites from Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe and Latin America.. 541 HIV-1 infected adults virologically failing first-line non-NRTI + 2N(t)RTI, with no previous exposure to protease inhibitors or integrase strand transfer inhibitors were analysed, 425 completed 96 weeks follow up on randomised therapy.. Randomisation was 1:1 to Control or RAL.. Differences between the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA (VL) <200 copies/mL by intention to treat were compared with a non-inferiority margin of -12%. Differences in biochemical, haematological and metabolic changes were assessed using T-tests.. VL <200 copies/mL at 96 weeks was: RAL 80.4%, Control 76.0% (difference: 4.4 [95%CI -2.6, 11.3]) and met non-inferiority criteria. The RAL arm had a significantly higher mean change (difference Control-RAL; 95%CI) in haemoglobin (-2.9; -5.7, -1.1), total lymphocytes (-0.2; -0.3, -0.0), total cholesterol (-0.5; -0.8, -0.3), HDL cholesterol (-0.1; -0.1, -0.0) and LDL cholesterol (-0.3; -0.5, -0.2).. At 96 weeks, both RAL and Control maintained efficacy greater than 75% and continued to demonstrate similar safety profiles. These results support the use of a combination LPV/r and RAL regimen as an option following failure of 1st line NNRTI + 2N(t)RTIs.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00931463.

Topics: Adult; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Secondary Care

Saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg twice daily [BID]) is associated with dose- and exposure-dependent prolongation of the QT interval. The QT risk is considered higher during the first week of therapy, when saquinavir peak exposure has been observed. A modified regimen with a lower dose lead-in phase may reduce potential saquinavir-/ritonavir-induced QT prolongations.. To explore the effect of the modified saquinavir/ritonavir regimen on QT interval, pharmacokinetics, antiviral activity, and safety in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients.. Twenty-three HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve patients received saquinavir/ritonavir 500/100 mg BID on days 1-7 and 1000/100 mg BID on days 8-14 in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The primary endpoint was mean maximum change from dense predose baseline in QT values corrected using Fridericia's formula (∆QTcFdense) across study days. Secondary endpoints included maximum change from time-matched baseline in QTcF, antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics, and safety over the 14 days.. The mean maximum ∆QTcFdense was 3, 1, 7, 12, and 7 ms on days 3, 4, 7, 10, and 14, respectively. Across all study days, 2/21 patients had a maximum ∆QTcFdense ≥30 ms (on day 10); the highest mean ∆QTcFdense was <10 ms. During week 1, saquinavir exposure was highest on day 3 and lowest on day 7. All patients showed continuous declines in HIV-RNA; none experienced virologic breakthrough/rebound. The modified regimen was generally well tolerated.. Treatment initiation with the modified saquinavir/ritonavir regimen in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients reduced saquinavir exposure during week 1, potentially mitigating/reducing QT liability while suppressing HIV-RNA during the course of treatment.

Topics: Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Male; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Metabolic effects following combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) vary by regimen type. Changes in metabolic effects were assessed following cART in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5257 study, and correlated with plasma ritonavir trough concentrations (C24).. Treatment-naive adult subjects were randomized to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or darunavir, or raltegravir-based cART. Changes in lipids and other metabolic outcomes over time were estimated. Differences between arms were estimated with 97.5% confidence intervals and compared using pairwise Student t tests. Associations between ritonavir C24 and lipid changes at week 48 were evaluated via linear regression.. Analyses included 1797 subjects with baseline fasting data. Baseline lipid profiles and metabolic syndrome rates (approximately 21%) were similar across arms. Comparable increases occurred in total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with the boosted protease inhibitors (PIs); each PI had greater increases relative to raltegravir (all P ≤ .001 at week 96). Metabolic syndrome incident rates by week 96 (approximately 22%) were not different across arms. Ritonavir C24 was not different by arm (P = .89) (median, 69 ng/mL and 74 ng/mL in the atazanavir and darunavir arms, respectively) and were not associated with changes in lipid measures (all P > .1).. Raltegravir produced the most favorable lipid profile. Metabolic syndrome rates were high at baseline and increased to the same degree in all arms. Ritonavir C24 was not different in the PI arms and had no relationship with the modest but comparable increases in lipids observed with either atazanavir or darunavir. The long-term clinical significance of the lipid changes noted with the PIs relative to raltegravir deserves further evaluation.. NCT 00811954.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Blood Glucose; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lipids; Male; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir

Tenofovir (TDF) and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) were not introduced to China as second-line medications until 2009. The efficacy and safety of TDF/3TC/LPV/r based second-line regimen have not been evaluated in Chinese HIV patients who failed first-line regimens.. This was a multicenter cohort study recruiting patients from Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong, and Henan provinces between November 2008 and January 2010. Eighty HIV infected patients failing first-line regimens with serum creatinine lower than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal received TDF+ lamivudine (3TC)+ LPV/r were followed up for 120 weeks. CD4 cell count, viral load, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were monitored at each visit.. At baseline, 31.2% and 48.8% of patients had moderate/high-level resistance to TDF and 3TC, respectively; while 2.5% of patients had only low-level resistance to LPV/r. During 120 weeks of follow-up, virological suppression rate reached over 70% (<40 copies/ml) and 90% (<400 copies/ml), and median CD4 cell count increased from 157 cells/μL at baseline to 307 cells/μL at week 120. Baseline drug-resistance mutations had no impact on the efficacy of second-line antiretroviral therapy. Median eGFR dropped from 104.7 ml/min/1.73m2 at baseline to 95.6 ml/min/1.73m2 at week 24 and then recovered after week 96.. This study for the first time demonstrated that TDF+ 3TC+ LPV/r was efficacious as second-line regimen with acceptable nephrotoxicity profiles in patients who failed zidovudine or stavudine based first-line regimens in China.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00872417.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; China; Cohort Studies; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

Few randomized clinical trials have investigated antiretroviral regimens in very advanced HIV-1-infected patients. The objective was to study the immune reconstitution in very immunosuppressed antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected individuals by comparing an efavirenz-based regimen with 2 ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor regimens.. Randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter clinical trial. Eighty-nine HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-naive patients with <100 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to efavirenz (n = 29), atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 30), or lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 30) combined with tenofovir plus emtricitabine. The primary outcome was median increase in CD4 cell count at week 48. Secondary end points were the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter, adverse events, disease progression, and death.. In the on-treatment analysis, the median (interquartile range) increase in the CD4 count after 48 weeks was +193 (129-349) cells per microliter in the efavirenz arm, +197 (146-238) cells per microliter in the ritonavir-boosted atazanavir arm, and +205 (178-327) cells per microliter in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir arm (P = 0.73). The percentage of patients achieving viral suppression was similar in all 3 treatment arms at 48 weeks {efavirenz, 85.71% [95% confidence interval (CI): 68.5 to 94.3]; atazanavir, 80% [95% CI: 62.7 to 90.5]; and lopinavir, 82.8% [95% CI: 65.5 to 92.4]; P = 0.88}. Bacterial translocation, inflammation, immune activation, and apoptotic markers, but not D-dimer, declined significantly and similarly in the 3 treatment arms. Adverse events had a similar incidence in all 3 antiretroviral regimens. No patients died.. The immune reconstitution induced by an efavirenz-based regimen in very advanced HIV-1-infected patients was similar to that induced by a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based regimen (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00532168).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Plasma; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

DRIVESHAFT is a randomized, open-label, 48-week clinical trial that examined virological outcomes and safety of antiretroviral simplification among virologically suppressed, treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients switching from darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) twice-daily-based regimens to a once-daily DRV/r component.. HIV-infected adults with a stable antiretroviral regimen including DRV/r 600/100 mg twice daily plus a minimum of two other antiretrovirals, <2 historical DRV-associated mutations and HIV RNA<40 copies/ml for at least 12 weeks prior to entry were eligible. Participants were randomized 1:1 to switch DRV/r to 800/100 mg once daily or maintain their current regimen. The primary end point was HIV-1 RNA<40 copies/ml at week 48 using the Snapshot algorithm.. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between arms. Virological suppression was greater in the DRV/r once-daily (n=30) versus twice-daily (n=30) arm at week 48 (90.0% versus 83.3%; 95% CI: -11.5, 24.8). Three subjects discontinued the once-daily arm, with four discontinuations and one virological failure in the twice-daily arm. No discontinuations were related to adverse events. Reduction in LDL was significantly greater in the once-daily arm at week 24 (-8.0 mg/dl versus 3.3 mg/dl; P=0.04). There was a trend towards suboptimal adherence <90% to antiretrovirals among subjects taking twice-daily versus once-daily DRV/r by week 48 (12.0% versus 0.0%; P=0.06).. Switching from twice-daily to once-daily DRV/r in virologically suppressed patients maintains virological control, with greater reduction in LDL cholesterol by 24 weeks. This study provides pilot data that could be used to design a non-inferiority study to definitively answer the question of whether switching from twice-daily to once-daily DRV/r maintains viral suppression. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01423812.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Retreatment; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Specific antiretroviral therapy (ART) medications and the severity of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease before treatment contribute to bone mineral density (BMD) loss after ART initiation.. We compared the percentage change in BMD over 96 weeks in 328 HIV-infected, treatment-naive individuals randomized equally to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) plus atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r), darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), or raltegravir (RAL). We also determined whether baseline levels of inflammation markers and immune activation were independently associated with BMD loss.. At week 96, the mean percentage changes from baseline in spine and hip BMDs were similar in the protease inhibitor (PI) arms (spine: -4.0% in the ATV/r group vs -3.6% in the DRV/r [P = .42]; hip: -3.9% in the ATV/r group vs -3.4% in the DRV/r group [P = .36]) but were greater in the combined PI arms than in the RAL arm (spine: -3.8% vs -1.8% [P < .001]; hip: -3.7% vs -2.4% [P = .005]). In multivariable analyses, higher baseline concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and soluble CD14 were associated with greater total hip BMD loss, whereas markers of CD4(+) T-cell senescence and exhaustion (CD4(+)CD28(-)CD57(+)PD1(+)) and CD4(+) T-cell activation (CD4(+)CD38(+)HLA-DR(+)) were associated with lumbar spine BMD loss.. BMD losses 96 weeks after ART initiation were similar in magnitude among patients receiving PIs, ATV/r, or DRV/r but lowest among those receiving RAL. Inflammation and immune activation/senescence before ART initiation independently predicted subsequent BMD loss.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Bone Density; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Viral Load; Young Adult

Antiretroviral combination therapy raises issues of long-term adherence and toxicity. Initial treatment simplification based on single-drug therapy was investigated in the MONARK trial, which compared first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (arm A) with first-line lopinavir/ritonavir + zidovudine/lamivudine tritherapy (arm B). The MONARK trial is registered as a randomized trial at clinical trials.gov under identifier NCT 00234923.. Immune recovery was compared in patients with undetectable plasma virus (<50 copies/mL) after 60 weeks of treatment (arm A, n = 21; arm B, n = 13).. The week 60 CD4 T cell count and CD4 T cell subset distribution did not differ significantly between the treatment arms. Memory CD4 T cell responses to HIV and recall antigens were better with triple therapy than with monotherapy. The frequencies of activated CD8 T cells and anti-HIV CD8 T cell effector responses were similar in the two arms. However, the repertoire of CD8 T cell effector responses was broader and persistent residual viraemia more frequent (by ultrasensitive PCR) in the monotherapy arm.. While viral control can be achieved with first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy, the quality of immune recovery is inferior to that obtained with triple therapy, possibly owing to a higher level of residual viral replication. Thus, the benefits of first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy in terms of toxicity and adherence might be offset by an increased risk of residual viral replication, which may also fuel latent viral reservoirs.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; T-Lymphocyte Subsets; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Virus Replication

Our objective was to assess therapeutic non-inferiority of dual treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir and lamivudine to triple treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir plus two nucleos(t)ides for maintenance of HIV-1 viral suppression.. In this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we recruited patients from 32 HIV units in hospitals in Spain and France. Eligible patients were HIV-infected adults (aged ≥18 years) with HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL, for at least 6 months on triple treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir (twice daily) plus lamivudine or emtricitabine and a second nucleos(t)ide, with no resistance or virological failure to these drugs, and no positive hepatitis B serum surface antigen. Investigators at each centre randomly assigned patients (1:1; block size of four; stratified by time to suppression [<1 year or >1 year] and nadir CD4 cell count [<100 cells per μL or >100 cells per μL]; computer-generated random sequence) to continue triple treatment or switch to dual treatment (oral lopinavir 400 mg and oral ritonavir 100 mg twice daily plus oral lamivudine 300 mg once daily). The primary endpoint was response to treatment in the intention-to-treat population (all randomised patients) at 48 weeks. The non-inferiority margin was 12%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01471821.. Between Oct 1, 2011, and April 1, 2013, we randomly assigned 250 participants to continue triple treatment (127 [51%] patients) or switch to dual treatment (123 [49%] patients). In the intention-to-treat population, 110 (86·6%) of 127 patients in the triple-treatment group responded to treatment versus 108 (87·8%) of 123 in the dual-treatment group (difference -1·2% [95% CI -9·6 to 7·3]; p=0·92), meeting the criteria for non-inferiority. Serious adverse events occurred in eight (7%) patients in the triple-treatment group and five (4%) in the dual-treatment group (p=0·515), and study drug discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in four (3%) in the triple-treatment group and one (1%) in the dual-treatment group (p=0·223).. Dual treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir plus lamivudine has non-inferior therapeutic efficacy and is similarly tolerated to triple treatment.. AbbVie and Red Temática Cooperativa de Investigación en Sida.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Deoxycytidine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

Problems associated with lifelong antiretroviral therapy, such as need for strict adherence, drug-related toxic effects, difficulties with treatment schedules, and cost, mean that simplification strategies should be sought. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of dual treatment with atazanavir-ritonavir plus lamivudine as an option to switch to from standard combination antiretroviral therapy in patients with an HIV-1 infection who are virologically suppressed.. In this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years and older with chronic HIV-1 infection and no previous treatment failure or resistance, and with HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL for at least 6 months, negative hepatitis B virus surface antigen, and good general health, from 30 hospitals in Spain. Exclusion criteria were switch in antiretroviral therapy during the previous 4 months, previous virological failure, pregnancy or breastfeeding, Gilbert's syndrome, use of contraindicated drugs, grade 4 laboratory abnormalities, and previous intolerance to any of the study drugs. We randomly assigned patients (1:1; stratified by active hepatitis C virus infection and previous treatment; computer-generated random number sequence) to dual treatment with oral atazanavir (300 mg once daily) and ritonavir (100 mg once daily) plus lamivudine (300 mg once daily) or triple treatment with oral atazanavir (300 mg once daily) and ritonavir (100 mg once daily) plus two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors at the discretion of the investigators. The primary endpoint was virological response, defined as HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL at week 48, in the per-protocol population, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%. We included patients who received at least one dose of the study drug in the safety analysis. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01307488.. Between Sept 29, 2011, and May 2, 2013, we randomly assigned 286 patients (143 [50%] to each group). At week 48 in the per-protocol population, 112 (84%) of 133 patients had virological response in the dual-treatment group versus 105 (78%) of 135 in the triple-treatment group (difference 6% [95% CI -5 to 16%), showing non-inferiority at the prespecified level. 14 (5%) patients developed severe adverse events (dual treatment six [4%]; triple treatment eight [6%]), none of which we deemed related to the study drug. Grade 3-4 adverse events were similar between groups (dual treatment 77 [55%] of 140; triple treatment 78 [55%] of 141). Treatment discontinuations were less frequent in the dual-treatment group (three [2%]) than in the triple-treatment group (ten [7%]; p=0·047).. In our trial, dual treatment was effective, safe, and non-inferior to triple treatment in patients with an HIV-1 infection who are virologically suppressed who switch antiretroviral therapy because of toxic effects, intolerance, or simplification. This combination has the potential to suppress some of the long-term toxic effects associated with nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, preserve future treatment options, and reduce the cost of antiretroviral therapy.. Bristol Myers-Squibb and Fundación SEIMC-GESIDA.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Deoxycytidine; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Viral Load; Zidovudine

PRINCE-1 is an ongoing prospective, international, multicentre, nonrandomized, two-stage clinical trial assessing safety and efficacy of once-daily atazanavir (ATV) powder boosted with ritonavir (RTV) liquid plus optimized dual nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) background therapy in antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve and -experienced children with HIV-1 infection aged ≥3 months to <6 years.. Children with HIV-1 infection without prior ATV exposure and with a screening HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies/mL were enrolled. The dosing of ATV powder, boosted with 80 mg RTV liquid, was based on three baseline weight bands (5 to <10 kg=150 mg, 10 to <15 kg=200 mg and 15 to <25 kg=250 mg).. Of the 56 treated patients, 46 completed 48 weeks of therapy, 67.9% were from Africa and 60.7% were ART-naïve. Median ages at baseline were 6, 35 and 55 months, and proportions with HIV-1 RNA >100,000 were 85.7, 52.6 and 25% in the three baseline weight bands, respectively. No unexpected safety events occurred and no deaths were reported. Over 48 weeks, upper respiratory tract infections, diarrhoea, vomiting and Grade 3 to 4 hyperbilirubinaemia occurred in 35.7, 35.7, 28.6, and 9.4% of patients, respectively; five patients (8.9%) discontinued due to adverse events (AEs); and 11 patients (19.6%) experienced serious adverse events. At Week 48, using a modified intent-to-treat analysis (two patients were excluded because they switched to ATV capsules before Week 48), 61.1 and 74.1% of patients overall had an HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL and <400 copies/mL, respectively. Virologic suppression rates increased across the lowest to highest baseline weight bands (47.6, 68.4 and 71.4% had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL, and 66.7, 73.7 and 85.7% had HIV-RNA <400 copies/mL, respectively) but did not differ meaningfully between ARV-naïve and -experienced patients. Overall, the median change from baseline in CD4 cell count was +363 cells/mm(3), and the median change from baseline in CD4 percent was +7.5%.. ATV powder boosted with RTV liquid once daily plus optimized dual NRTI background therapy was effective and well tolerated in this ART-naïve or -experienced paediatric population aged ≥3 months to <6 years. No unexpected safety findings compared with those from previous ATV paediatric and adult studies were identified.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Male; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir

Cobicistat (COBI) is a pharmacoenhancer with no antiretroviral activity.. International, randomized double-blind active-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of COBI vs ritonavir (RTV) as a pharmacoenhancer of atazanavir in combination with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HIV treatment-naive patients followed through week 144.. At Week 144, virologic suppression was achieved in 72% (COBI) and 74% (RTV) of patients. Adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation occurred in 11% of patients in each group. Median changes in serum creatinine (mg/dL) were +0.13 (COBI) and +0.07 (RTV) and were unchanged from week 48.. Once-daily COBI is a safe and effective pharmacoenhancer of the protease inhibitor atazanavir.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Cobicistat; Deoxycytidine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Thiazoles; Viral Load

Regimen selection for highly treatment-experienced patients is complicated.. Using a web-based utility, study team members reviewed antiretroviral (ARV) history and resistance data and recommended individual ARV regimens and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) options for treatment-experienced participants consisting of 3-4 of the following agents: raltegravir (RAL), darunavir (DRV)/ritonavir, tipranavir (TPV)/ritonavir, etravirine (ETR), maraviroc (MVC), and enfuvirtide (ENF). We evaluated team recommendations and site selection of regimen and NRTIs. Associations between baseline factors and the selection of a complex regimen (defined as including four ARV agents or ENF) were explored with logistic regression.. A total of 413 participants entered the study. Participants initiated the first or second recommended regimen 86% of the time and 21% of participants started a complex regimen. In a multivariable model, ARV resistance to NRTI (odds ratio [OR] = 2.2), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI, OR = 6.2) or boosted protease inhibitor (PI, OR = 6.6), prior use of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI, OR = 25), and race-ethnicity (all P ≤ 0.01) were associated with selection of a complex regimen. Black non-Hispanic (OR = 0.5) and Hispanic participants from the continental US (OR = 0.2) were less likely to start a complex regimen, compared to white non-Hispanics.. In this multi-center trial, we developed a web-based utility that facilitated treatment recommendations for highly treatment-experienced patients. Drug resistance, prior INSTI use, and race-ethnicity were key factors in decisions to select a more complex regimen.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Enfuvirtide; Female; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Peptide Fragments; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy

Premature atherosclerosis in HIV-infected patients is associated with chronic infection by itself and adverse effects of antiretroviral treatment (ART). Extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) has a beneficial effect on the cardiovascular system because of its anti-inflammatory properties. The objective of this study was to determine whether the consumption of EVOO improves inflammation and atherosclerosis biomarkers in HIV-infected patients receiving ART.. This randomized, crossover, controlled trial included 39 HIV-positive male participants who consumed 50 mL of EVOO or refined olive oil (ROO) daily. Four participants dropped out of the study. Leukocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6, fibrinogen, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, malondialdehyde, glutathione-peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, oxidized LDL and von Willebrand factor were determined before the first and after each of the 2 intervention periods. Intervention and washout periods lasted for 20 and 14 days, respectively.. In participants with >90% compliance (N=30), hsCRP concentrations were lower after EVOO intervention (geometric mean [GM], 1.70 mg/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.52) compared to ROO administration (GM, 2.92 mg/L; 95% CI, 1.95-4.37) (p=0.035). In participants using lopinavir/ritonavir, ESR and hsCRP concentrations decreased 62% and 151%, respectively, after EVOO administration. In the whole study population (N=35) we found no difference in analyzed biomarkers after EVOO administration.. Our exploratory study suggests that EVOO consumption could lower hsCRP in patients on ART.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atherosclerosis; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Combinations; Food Handling; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Olive Oil; Ritonavir; Single-Blind Method; Young Adult

Coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF; Stribild(®)) is a recommended integrase inhibitor-based regimen in treatment guidelines from the US Department of Health and Human Services and the British HIV Association. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the change in patient-reported symptoms over time among HIV-infected adults who switch to Stribild(®) versus those continuing on a protease inhibitor (PI) with FTC/TDF.. A secondary analysis was conducted on the STRATEGY-PI study (GS-US-236-0115, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01475838), a randomized, open-label, phase 3b trial of HIV-infected adults taking a PI with FTC/TDF who were randomly assigned (2:1) either to Stribild(®) (switch) or continuation of their existing regimen (no-switch). Logistic regressions and longitudinal modeling were conducted to evaluate the relationship of treatment with bothersome symptoms.. At week 4 as compared with baseline, the switch group experienced a statistically significantly lower prevalence in five symptoms (diarrhea/loose bowels, bloating/pain/gas in stomach, pain/numbness/tingling in hands/feet, nervous/anxious, and trouble remembering). The lower prevalence of diarrhea/loose bowels, bloating/pain/gas in stomach, and pain/numbness/tingling in hands/feet observed at week 4 was maintained over time. While there were no significant differences between groups in the prevalence of sad/down/depressed and problems with sex at week 4 or week 48, longitudinal models indicated the switch group had a statistically significantly decreased prevalence in both symptoms from week 4 to week 48. As compared with the no-switch group, higher levels of satisfaction with treatment were experienced by patients in the switch group at the first follow-up visit and at week 24.. In this study sample, a switch from a ritonavir-boosted PI, FTC, and TDF regimen to coformulated EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was associated with more treatment satisfaction and a reduction in the prevalence of patient-reported diarrhea/loose bowel symptoms, which was maintained over the 48-week study period.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Combinations; Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Patient Outcome Assessment; Patient Satisfaction; Protease Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

Major protease mutations are rarely observed following failure with protease inhibitors (PI), and other viral determinants of failure to PI are poorly understood. We therefore characterized Gag-Protease phenotypic susceptibility in subtype A and D viruses circulating in East Africa following viral rebound on PIs.. Samples from baseline and treatment failure in patients enrolled in the second line LPV/r trial SARA underwent phenotypic susceptibility testing. Data were expressed as fold-change in susceptibility relative to a LPV-susceptible reference strain.. We cloned 48 Gag-Protease containing sequences from seven individuals and performed drug resistance phenotyping from pre-PI and treatment failure timepoints in seven patients. For the six patients where major protease inhibitor resistance mutations did not emerge, mean fold-change EC50 to LPV was 4.07 fold (95% CI, 2.08-6.07) at the pre-PI timepoint. Following viral failure the mean fold-change in EC50 to LPV was 4.25 fold (95% CI, 1.39-7.11, p = 0.91). All viruses remained susceptible to DRV. In our assay system, the major PI resistance mutation I84V, which emerged in one individual, conferred a 10.5-fold reduction in LPV susceptibility. One of the six patients exhibited a significant reduction in susceptibility between pre-PI and failure timepoints (from 4.7 fold to 9.6 fold) in the absence of known major mutations in protease, but associated with changes in Gag: V7I, G49D, R69Q, A120D, Q127K, N375S and I462S. Phylogenetic analysis provided evidence of the emergence of genetically distinct viruses at the time of treatment failure, indicating ongoing viral evolution in Gag-protease under PI pressure.. Here we observe in one patient the development of significantly reduced susceptibility conferred by changes in Gag which may have contributed to treatment failure on a protease inhibitor containing regimen. Further phenotype-genotype studies are required to elucidate genetic determinants of protease inhibitor failure in those who fail without traditional resistance mutations whilst PI use is being scaled up globally.

Topics: Drug Resistance, Viral; gag Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Mutation; Phenotype; Ritonavir; Treatment Failure

WHO-recommended second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) of a pharmacologically enhanced (boosted) protease inhibitor plus nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NtRTIs) might be compromised by resistance. Results of the 96 week SECOND-LINE randomised trial showed that NtRTI-sparing ART with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and raltegravir (raltegravir-group) provided non-inferior efficacy to ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and two or three NtRTIs (NtRTI-group) in participants with virological failure composed of a first-line regimen of a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor plus two NtRTIs. We report the relation of baseline virological resistance with virological failure and emergent resistance on study.. As part of the randomised open-label SECOND-LINE trial, second-line ART NtRTI selection was made by either genotype (local laboratory) or algorithm. Genotypic resistance for the entire cohort at baseline was assessed on stored samples at a central laboratory. Virological failure was defined as plasma viral load greater than 200 copies per mL. Baseline viral isolates were assigned genotypic sensitivity scores (GSSs) by use of the Stanford HIV Database version 6.3.1: a global GSS (gGSS), defined as the combined GSS for lamivudine or emtricitabine, abacavir, zidovudine, stavudine, didanosine, and tenofovir and a specific GSS (sGSS) defined as the GSS for the ART regimen initiated by a specific participant. Emergent resistance was reported on samples with a viral load greater than 500 copies per mL. We used multivariate logistic regression with backward elimination to assess predictors of virological failure and emergent resistance.. From April 19, 2010, to July 22, 2013, 271 patients were included in the NtRTI group and and 270 in the raltegravir group. In the NtRTI group 215 had available baseline sequence data, and 240 had viral load measurements at 96 weeks; in the raltegravir group 236 had baseline sequence data and 255 had viral load measurements at 96 weeks. Median (IQR) gGSS was 3.0 (1.3-4.3) in the NtRTI group and 3.0 (1.0-4.3) in the raltegravir group. The median sGSS in the NtRTI group was 1.0 (0.5-1.8). Multivariate analysis showed significant associations between virological failure and less than complete adherence at week 4 (odds ratio [OR] 2.18, 95%CI 1.07-4.47; p=0·03) and week 48 (2.49, 1.09-5.69; p=0.03), baseline plasma viral load greater than 100,000 copies per mL (3.43, 1.70-6.94; p=0.0006), baseline gGSS >4.25 (4.73, 1.94-11.6; p=0.0007), and being Hispanic (3.13, 1.21-8.13; p=0.02) or African (3.49, 1.68-7.28; p=0.0008) rather than Asian. We observed emergent major mutations in one (1%) of 129 participants for protease (both groups), eight (13%) of 64 for reverse transcriptase (NtRTI group) and 16 (20%) of 79 for integrase. Emergent resistance was associated with the raltegravir group (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.02-5.99; p=0.05), baseline log10 viral load (1.83, 1.12-2.97; p=0.02), and absence of the Lys65Arg (K65R) or Lys70Glu (K70E) mutation at baseline (3.18, 1.12-9.02; p=0.03).. Poor adherence was a major determinant of virological failure in people on second-line ART. In settings with limited resources, investment in optimisation of adherence rather than implementation of drug resistance testing might be advisable.. University of New South Wales Australia, Merck, AbbVie, and the Foundation for AIDS Research.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; South Australia; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

The primary analysis of the FLAMINGO study at 48 weeks showed that patients taking dolutegravir once daily had a significantly higher virological response rate than did those taking ritonavir-boosted darunavir once daily, with similar tolerability. We present secondary efficacy and safety results analysed at 96 weeks.. FLAMINGO was a multicentre, open-label, phase 3b, non-inferiority study of HIV-1-infected treatment-naive adults. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to dolutegravir 50 mg or darunavir 800 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg, with investigator-selected combination tenofovir and emtricitabine or combination abacavir and lamivudine background treatment. The main endpoints were plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL and safety. The non-inferiority margin was -12%. If the lower end of the 95% CI was greater than 0%, then we concluded that dolutegravir was superior to ritonavir-boosted darunavir. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01449929.. Of 595 patients screened, 488 were randomly assigned and 484 included in the analysis (242 assigned to receive dolutegravir and 242 assigned to receive ritonavir-boosted darunavir). At 96 weeks, 194 (80%) of 242 patients in the dolutegravir group and 164 (68%) of 242 in the ritonavir-boosted darunavir group had HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL (adjusted difference 12·4, 95% CI 4·7-20·2; p=0·002), with the greatest difference in patients with high viral load at baseline (50/61 [82%] vs 32/61 [52%], homogeneity test p=0·014). Six participants (three since 48 weeks) in the dolutegravir group and 13 (four) in the darunavir plus ritonavir group discontinued because of adverse events. The most common drug-related adverse events were diarrhoea (23/242 [10%] in the dolutegravir group vs 57/242 [24%] in the darunavir plus ritonavir group), nausea (31/242 [13%] vs 34/242 [14%]), and headache (17/242 [7%] vs 12/242 [5%]).. Once-daily dolutegravir is associated with a higher virological response rate than is once-daily ritonavir-boosted darunavir. Dolutegravir compares favourably in efficacy and safety to a boosted darunavir regimen with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor background treatment for HIV-1-infected treatment-naive patients.. ViiV Healthcare and Shionogi & Co.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Isoniazid preventive therapy is recommended in patients on antiretroviral treatment (ART) with latent tuberculous infection to prevent progression to active tuberculosis disease. Isoniazid (INH) inhibits cytochrome (CY) P3A4, which metabolises lopinavir (LPV). The administration of INH may cause higher LPV concentrations, which may increase LPV toxicity. LPV bioavailability is increased by co-formulated ritonavir (r), which may enhance the interaction of INH on LPV. We studied the effect of INH on LPV concentrations by administering INH for 7 days and performing intensive pharmacokinetic sampling in 16 human immunodeficiency virus infected patients established on LPV/r-based ART. INH did not significantly increase steady-state LPV area under the plasma concentration-time curve calculated for the 12 h-dosing interval.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Isoniazid; Latent Tuberculosis; Lopinavir; Male; Ritonavir; South Africa

Osteopenia, osteoporosis, and low bone mineral density are frequent in patients with HIV. We assessed the 96 week loss of bone mineral density associated with a nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NtRTI)-sparing regimen.. Antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV were enrolled in 78 clinical sites in 15 European countries into a randomised (1:1), open-label, non-inferiority trial (NEAT001/ANRS143) assessing the efficacy and safety of darunavir (800 mg once per day) and ritonavir (100 mg once per day) plus either raltegravir (400 mg twice per day; NtRTI-sparing regimen) or tenofovir (245 mg once per day) and emtricitabine (200 mg once per day; standard regimen). For this bone-health substudy, 20 of the original sites in six countries participated, and any patient enrolled at one of these sites who met the following criteria was eligible: plasma viral loads greater than 1000 HIV RNA copies per mL and CD4 cell counts of fewer than 500 cells per μL, except in those with symptomatic HIV infection. Exclusion criteria included treatment for malignant disease, testing positive for hepatitis B virus surface antigen, pregnancy, creatinine clearance less than 60 mL per min, treatment for osteoporosis, systemic steroids, or oestrogen-replacement therapy. The two primary endpoints were the mean percentage changes in lumbar spine and total hip bone mineral density at week 48, assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. We did the analysis with an intention-to-treat-exposed approach with antiretroviral modifications ignored. The parent trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01066962, and is closed to new participants.. Between Aug 2, 2010, and April 18, 2011, we recruited 146 patients to the substudy, 70 assigned to the NtRTI-sparing regimen and 76 to the standard regimen. DXA data were available for 129, 121 and 107 patients at baseline, 48 and 96 weeks respectively. At week 48, the mean percentage loss in bone mineral density in the lumbar spine was greater in the standard group than in the NtRTI-sparing group (mean percentage change -2.49% vs -1.00%, mean percentage difference -1.49, 95% CI -2.94 to -0.04; p=0.046). Total hip bone mineral density loss was similarly greater at week 48 in the standard group than in the NtRTI-sparing group (mean percentage change -3.30% vs -0.73%; mean percentage difference -2.57, 95% CI -3.75 to -1.35; p<0.0001). Seven new fractures occurred during the trial (two in the NtRTI-sparing group and five in the standard group).. A raltegravir-based regimen was associated with significantly less loss of bone mineral density than a standard regimen containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and might be a treatment option for patients at high risk of osteopenia or osteoporosis who are not suitable for NtRTIs such as abacavir or tenofovir alafenamide.. The European Union Sixth Framework Programme, Inserm-ANRS, Ministerio de Sanidad y Asuntos Sociales de España, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Merck Laboratories.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Biomarkers; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Comorbidity; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Europe; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Inflammation; Male; Middle Aged; Osteopetrosis; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Viral Load

To evaluate whether once daily (q.d.) lopinavir/ritonavir is noninferior to twice daily (b.i.d.) dosing in children.. International, multicentre, phase II/III, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial (KONCERT/PENTA18/ANRS150).. Clinical centres participating in the PENTA, HIV-NAT and PHPT networks.. Children/adolescents with HIV-1 RNA viral load less than 50 copies/ml for at least 24 weeks on lopinavir/ritonavir-containing antiretroviral therapy.. Children were randomized to continue lopinavir/ritonavir b.i.d. or change to q.d.. Confirmed viral load ≥50 copies/ml by 48 weeks (12% noninferiority margin).. One hundred seventy-three children were randomized in the KONCERT trial (86 q.d., 87 b.i.d.); 46% men, median (IQR) age 11 (9-14) years, CD4% 33 (27-38)%. By week 48, 97 and 98% of time was spent on q.d. and b.i.d., respectively (one q.d. child lost at week 4). Twelve q.d. vs. seven b.i.d. children had confirmed viral load ≥50 copies/ml within 48 weeks; estimated difference in percentage with viral load rebound 6% [90% CI (-2, 14)]. Numbers of children with grade 3/4 adverse events (11 vs. 7) or major resistance mutations (3 vs. 2) were similar, q.d. vs. b.i.d. (both P > 0.3). Among 26 children in an intrasubject lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetic substudy, lower daily exposure (AUC0-24 161 h.mg/l vs. 224 h.mg/l) and lower Clast (1.03 mg/l vs. 5.69 mg/l) were observed with q.d. vs. b.i.d. dosing.. Noninferiority for viral load suppression on q.d. vs. b.i.d. lopinavir/ritonavir was not demonstrated. Although results, therefore, do not support routine use of q.d. lopinavir/ritonavir, lack of safety concerns or resistance suggest that q.d. dosing remains an option in selected, adherent children, with close viral load monitoring.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy is recommended to reduce the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and for maternal care management. Physiological changes during pregnancy can affect pharmacokinetics, potentially altering pharmacological activity. We therefore evaluated the pharmacokinetics of twice-daily (bid) darunavir in HIV-1-infected pregnant women.. HIV-1-infected pregnant women receiving an antiretroviral regimen containing darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid were enrolled in this study. Total and unbound darunavir and total ritonavir plasma concentrations were obtained over 12 h during the second and third trimesters and postpartum. Total darunavir and ritonavir plasma concentrations were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay and unbound darunavir was determined using (14) C-darunavir-fortified plasma. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using noncompartmental analysis.. Data were available for 14 women. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC12h) for total darunavir was 17-24% lower during pregnancy than postpartum. The AUC12h for unbound darunavir was minimally reduced during pregnancy vs. postpartum. The minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) of total and unbound darunavir was on average 43-86% and 10-14% higher, respectively, during pregnancy vs. postpartum. The antiviral response (< 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) was 33% at baseline and increased to 73-90% during treatment; the percentage CD4 count increased over time. One serious adverse event was reported (increased transaminase). All 12 infants born to women remaining in the study at delivery were HIV-1-negative; four of these infants were premature.. Total darunavir exposure decreased during pregnancy. No clinically relevant change in unbound (active) darunavir occurred during pregnancy, suggesting that no dose adjustment is required for darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in pregnant women.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fetal Blood; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Outcome; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

Pharmacokinetics, safety and antiviral activity of fosamprenavir (FPV) with ritonavir (RTV) twice daily were evaluated in HIV-1-infected infants and children 4 weeks to <2 years over 48 weeks.. Results from intensive pharmacokinetic sampling of subjects enrolled in single dose visits was used to determine individualized dosing for the first 6-10 subjects in each of 2 cohorts (4 weeks to <6 months, 6 months to <2 years); steady state pharmacokinetic data were then used to select the dosage regimen for the remaining subjects recruited to the cohort. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed at week 2 or 8; predose samples were collected every 4-12 weeks thereafter. Safety and plasma HIV-1 RNA were monitored every 4-12 weeks.. Fifty-nine subjects received study medication. FPV 45 mg/kg boosted with RTV 7 to 10 mg/kg BID achieved average plasma amprenavir area under curve(0-τ) values 26% to 28% lower and Cmax similar to historical adult data for FPV/RTV 700/100 mg BID; amprenavir Cτ values were lower in the subjects <6 months of age. At week 48, 35 of 54 (65%) subjects had achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL and 33 of 54 (61%) had plasma HIV-1 RNA values <50 copies/mL. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, gastroenteritis and otitis media.. Final FPV/RTV dosing regimens achieved plasma amprenavir exposures comparable with those from regimens approved in adults, with the exception of trough exposures in the <6-month-old infants. The FPV/RTV regimens led to viral suppression in 61% of patients and were generally well tolerated.

Topics: Carbamates; Cohort Studies; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Male; Organophosphates; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Pharmacokinetics, safety and antiviral activity of twice-daily fosamprenavir with or without ritonavir were evaluated in 2- to 18-year-old protease inhibitor-naïve and -experienced HIV-1-infected children.. Serial pharmacokinetic samples were collected at week 2 and predose samples every 4-12 weeks. Safety and plasma HIV-1 RNA were monitored every 4-12 weeks.. Twenty protease inhibitor-naïve 2- to <6-year-old subjects received antiretroviral treatment including unboosted fosamprenavir twice-daily, whereas 89 protease inhibitor-naïve and -experienced 2- to 18-year-old subjects received fosamprenavir/ritonavir-containing therapy twice-daily. Median fosamprenavir exposure was 891 days (range 15-1805 days), with 88% exposed >48 weeks. Twice-daily doses of fosamprenavir/ritonavir 23/3 mg/kg in 2- to <6-year olds, 18/3 mg/kg in ≥6-year olds and 700/100 mg in adolescents achieved plasma amprenavir exposures comparable with or higher than 700/100 mg twice-daily in adults while fosamprenavir 30 mg/kg twice-daily in 2- to <6-year olds led to exposures higher than 1400 mg twice-daily in adults. The proportion of subjects with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL at week 48 was 60% for fosamprenavir and 53-74% for fosamprenavir/ritonavir (intent-to-treat [exposed], snapshot analysis). Median increases in absolute and relative (percentage) CD4 counts from baseline to week 48 occurred in both the fosamprenavir (340 cells/mm; 8%) and fosamprenavir/ritonavir group (190 cells/mm; 8%). The most common adverse events were vomiting, cough, and diarrhea; 18 subjects experienced serious adverse events, including 9 with suspected abacavir hypersensitivity.. Fosamprenavir regimens administered to HIV-1-infected children aged 2-18 years were generally well-tolerated and provided sustained antiviral activity over 48 weeks, with plasma amprenavir exposures comparable with or higher than adults.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Organophosphates; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

To evaluate the long-term (up to week 292) safety, efficacy and tolerability of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir in HIV-1-infected pediatric patients. Long-term follow up of patients enrolled in the randomized, open-label pediatric trial (1182.14/PACTG1051).. HIV-1-infected pediatric patients (2-18 years) who participated in the PACTG 1051 trial were followed for ritonavir-boosted tipranavir-based regimen efficacy, safety and tolerability through week 292.. In patients <12 years of age, 51/62 (82%) were receiving drug at week 48 and 13/62 (21%) at week 288. Among adolescents (12-18 years of age), 35/53 (66%) were receiving drug at week 48 and 2/53 (4%) at week 288. Among patients 2 to <6 years of age, 18/25 (72%) had viral loads <400 copies/mL at week 48. By week 292, 9/25 (36%) of patients had viral loads <400 copies/mL. Among older patients, week 48 responder rates were 35% (13/37 of patients 6 to <12 years of age) and 32% (17/53 of patients 12 to 18 years of age). By week 292, 6/37 (16%) of those 6 to <12 years of age and 2/53 (4%) of those 12 to 18 years of age had viral loads <400 copies/mL. Overall safety and tolerability profiles were best for children who initiated treatment between 2 and <6 years of age. Drug-related adverse events (investigator defined) were similar across all age groups (55-65%).. Pediatric patients who begin treatment at the earlier ages, and who are stable on a ritonavir-boosted tipranavir-based regimen at week 48, generally continue to demonstrate good safety, tolerability and virologic efficacy profiles up to 292 weeks of treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Pregnancy and food insecurity may impact antiretroviral (ART) pharmacokinetics (PK), adherence and response. We sought to quantify and characterize the PK of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and efavirenz (EFV) by pregnancy and nutritional status among HIV-infected women in Tororo, Uganda. In 2011, 62/225 ante-partum/post-partum single dried blood spot samples DBS and 43 post-partum hair samples for LPV/r were derived from 116 women, 51/194 ante-/post-partum DBS and 53 post-partum hair samples for EFV from 105 women. Eighty percent of Ugandan participants were severely food insecure, 26% lost weight ante-partum, and median BMI post-partum was only 20.2 kg/m(2) . Rich PK-data of normally nourished (pregnant) women and healthy Ugandans established prior information. Overall, drug exposure was reduced (LPV -33%, EFV -15%, ritonavir -17%) compared to well-nourished controls (P < 0.001), attributable to decreased bioavailability. Pregnancy increased LPV/r clearance 68% (P < 0.001), whereas EFV clearance remained unchanged. Hair concentrations correlated with plasma-exposure (P < 0.001), explaining 29% PK-variability. In conclusion, pregnancy and food insecurity were associated with lower ART exposures in this cohort of predominantly underweight women, compared to well-nourished women. Much variability in plasma-exposure was quantified using hair concentrations. Addressing malnutrition as well as ART-PK in this setting should be a priority.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Biological Availability; Breast Feeding; Cyclopropanes; Dried Blood Spot Testing; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hair; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Malnutrition; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Nutritional Status; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Ritonavir; Uganda; Young Adult

TMC310911 is a novel HIV type-1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitor with broad in vitro antiviral activity. In this phase 2a, open-label randomized study, the antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics, and safety and tolerability of ritonavir-boosted TMC310911 was assessed.. In this study, treatment-naive HIV-1 patients (aged 18-60 years) received 1 of the 4 dosing regimens of TMC310911: 150 mg twice-daily (bid) (n = 8), 300 mg bid (n = 8), 75 mg bid (n = 9), or 300 mg once-daily (qd) (n = 8), for 14 days, all coadministered with 100 mg of ritonavir, as only antiretroviral therapy.. The mean change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA (log10 copies per milliliter; primary efficacy endpoint) was -1.30 (75 mg bid), -1.14 (150 mg bid), -1.07 (300 mg bid), and -1.06 (300 mg qd) on day 8 and -1.53 (75 mg bid), -1.79 (150 mg bid), -1.69 (300 mg bid), and -1.55 (300 mg qd) on day 15. At steady state (day 14), the mean maximum plasma concentration and mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours tended to increase dose proportionally for bid doses; TMC310911 daily exposures for the 300 mg qd treatment and 150 mg bid treatment were comparable. The most common (≥ 10%) treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (27.3%) and nausea (12.1%); no deaths or serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in this study.. Combination treatment with TMC310911 and ritonavir showed potent antiviral activity (>1.5 log10 copies/mL decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA) at all evaluated doses, and treatment was generally safe and well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Blood; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

Detrimental bidirectional pharmacokinetic interactions have been observed when telaprevir (TVR) and ritonavir (RTV)-boosted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors are coadministered in healthy volunteers. Our aim was to evaluate the role of RTV in the bidirectional TVR and atazanavir (ATV) interactions.. An open-label, sequential study was carried out in hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-coinfected patients on a RTV-boosted ATV-based (ATVr) antiretroviral regimen (300/100 mg every 24 hours) and triple therapy for chronic C hepatitis genotype 1 (TVR, 1125 mg every 12 hours, pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin). Pharmacokinetic profiles were acquired before and after switching from ATVr to unboosted ATV (200 mg every 12 hours). The plasma levels of both drugs were determined by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis and compared by geometric mean ratios and their 90% confidence intervals.. Fourteen white HCV/HIV-coinfected males were enrolled in this study. After RTV was withdrawn, the TVR AUC(0-12) (area under the concentration-time curve), maximum concentration (C(max)), and minimum concentration (C(min)) values increased by 19% (7%-30%), 12% (0.9%-29%), and 18% (2%-34%), respectively, without any changes in the TVR terminal half-life. The ATV AUC(0-12), C(max), and C(min) values were 39% (13%-66%), 19% (8%-59%), and 48% (1%-96%) higher, respectively, with a significantly shorter terminal half-life (22.6 hours vs 10.4 hours).. RTV is responsible for the adverse interactions that occur when TVR and ATVr are administered together, possibly by influencing either the absorption phase or first-pass metabolism of TVR. The boost effect of TVR on ATV exposure is higher than on RTV, despite its shorter terminal half-life. The coadministration of TVR and unboosted ATV results in increased exposure of both drugs compared with their coadministration with RTV.. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01818856. European Medicines Agency EudraCT no. 2012-002515-25.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Chromatography, Liquid; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Plasma; Pyridines; Ribavirin; Ritonavir

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of a simplified regimen, in terms of reducing pill burden, dietary requirements and possible adverse effects, on patients' adherence, treatment satisfaction and quality of life (QoL).. Antiretroviral-naïve patients who achieved a viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml after induction therapy with twice-daily (bid) lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and fixed-dose zidovudine (ZDV)/lamivudine (3TC) (CBV) were randomly assigned to continue CBV/LPV/r or switch to fixed-dose ZDV/3TC/abacavir (TZV). Patients completed standardized questionnaires on adherence, treatment satisfaction and QoL at randomization (between weeks 12 and 24) and at weeks 48, 72 and 96.. Patients on CBV/LPV/r were more likely to have skipped medicines in the last week (P = 0.035) and during the preceding weekend (P = 0.027) than patients on TZV. Patients on CBV/LPV/r were significantly less satisfied with the convenience of their treatment (P = 0.004) and tended to be less satisfied with the side effects of their treatment (P = 0.091) and continuation of their present treatment (P = 0.056) than patients on TZV. Patients on CBV/LPV/r reported significantly lower levels of role functioning (P = 0.013) than patients on TZV.. In this randomized controlled trial, simplification of therapy to fixed-dose TZV among patients with suppressed HIV RNA was perceived to be more convenient, and resulted in improved adherence and better role functioning, than continuing treatment with CBV/LPV/r.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Belgium; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Odds Ratio; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Ritonavir; Zidovudine

Changes in body fat distribution and bone mass in HIV-infected patients may be associated with long-term use of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The Monarch trial recruited 30 patients receiving non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy, with HIV RNA <40 copies/mL. Patients were randomized to either darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily monotherapy or darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily + two NRTIs. Bone mass, peripheral lipoatrophy and central fat accumulation were assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning, supplemented by computed tomography scans. Median age was 43 years, 77% were men. Visceral adipose tissue remained stable from baseline to Week 48 in the whole group (p = 0.261) with no significant difference between arms (p = 0.56). There was a significant reduction in insulin resistance (HOMA-IR, p = 0.013) over 48 weeks in the whole group, but not of body mass index (p = 0.24). In the darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm, there was a small but significant increase in both lumbar and femur bone mineral density at 48 weeks and was observed after correction for baseline values. The absolute change in lumbar bone mineral density at 48 weeks was more pronounced in the darunavir/ritonavir arm compared with the darunavir/ritonavir + 2NRTIs arm. In this study, discontinuing nucleoside analogues and switching to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in bone mineral density, but stable levels of limb fat and visceral adipose tissue.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Body Fat Distribution; Bone Density; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

In the Prevention of Malaria and HIV disease in Tororo pediatrics trial, HIV-infected Ugandan children randomized to receive lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) experienced a lower incidence of malaria compared with children receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based ART. Here we present the results of the noninferiority analysis of virologic efficacy and comparison of immunologic outcomes.. ART-naive or -experienced (HIV RNA <400 copies/mL) children aged 2 months to 6 years received either LPV/r or NNRTI-based ART. The proportion of children with virologic suppression (HIV RNA <400 copies/mL) at 48 weeks was compared using a prespecified noninferiority margin of -11% in per-protocol analysis. Time to virologic failure by 96 weeks, change in CD4 counts and percentages, and incidence of adverse event rates were also compared.. Of 185 children enrolled, 91 initiated LPV/r and 92 initiated NNRTI-based ART. At baseline, the median age was 3.1 years (range, 0.4-5.9), and 131 (71%) children were ART-naive. The proportion of children with virologic suppression at 48 weeks was 80% (67/84) in the LPV/r arm vs. 76% (59/78) in the NNRTI arm, a difference of 4% (95% confidence interval: -9% to +17%). Time to virologic failure, CD4 changes, and the incidence of Division of AIDS grade III/IV adverse events were similar between arms.. LPV/r-based ART was not associated with worse virologic efficacy, immunologic efficacy, or adverse event rates compared with NNRTI-based ART. Considering these results and the reduction in malaria incidence associated with LPV/r previously reported for this trial, wider use of LPV/r to treat HIV-infected African children in similar malaria-endemic settings could be considered.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child, Preschool; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Malaria; Male; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Uganda; Viral Load

CD4(+) count increase has been reported to be different with lopinavir/r (LPV/r) and efavirenz (EFV)-containing regimens. The different effect of these two regimens on other immune function parameters and the relationship with the gain of CD4(+) count have not been assessed in a randomized clinical trial. Fifty antiretroviral treatment (cART) naïve HIV-infected individuals were randomized to receive LPV/r or EFV both with tenofovir/emtricitabine for 48 weeks. A substudy of immunological function restoration was performed in 22 patients (LPV/r n=10 and EFV n=12). Activation, thymic function, apoptosis, senescence, exhaustion, Treg cells, interleukin (IL)-7-receptor/IL-7 system, thymic volume, and lymphoid tissue fibrosis were evaluated at baseline and at week 48. Both groups experienced a CD4(+) count increase that was higher in the EFV group (ΔCD4(+) 88 vs. 315 cells/μl LPV/r vs. EFV, respectively, p<0.001). Despite this difference in CD4(+) gain, the change in other immune function parameters was similar in both treatment groups. Most of parameters evaluated tended to normalize after 48 weeks of cART. A significant decrease in levels of activation, senescence, exhaustion, and apoptosis on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells (p<0.001 for all) and a significant increase in markers of thymic function, IL-7 receptor, and in the levels of central memory CD4(+) T cells and naive subsets of CD8(+) T cells (p<0.001 for all) with respect to baseline values were observed without any difference between groups. These data indicate that the differences in CD4(+) gain with different cART regimens are not immunologically meaningful and might explain the similar clinical efficacy of these regimens.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; HIV Infections; Humans; Immune System; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir and darunavir are protease inhibitors that are recommended for initial treatment of HIV infection because each has shown better lipid effects and overall tolerability than ritonavir-boosted lopinavir. The extent to which lipid effects and overall tolerability differ between treatments with atazanavir and darunavir and whether atazanavir-induced hyperbilirubinaemia may result in more favourable metabolic effects are issues that remain to be resolved.. A 96-week randomized clinical trial was carried out. The primary endpoint was change in total cholesterol at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints were changes in lipids other than total cholesterol, insulin sensitivity, total bilirubin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and CD4 and CD8 cell counts, and the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and study drug discontinuation because of adverse effects at 24 weeks. Analyses were intent-to-treat.. One hundred and seventy-eight patients received once-daily treatment with either atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 90) or darunavir/ritonavir (n = 88) plus tenofovir/emtricitabine. At 24 weeks, mean total cholesterol had increased by 7.26 and 11.47 mg/dL in the atazanavir/ritonavir and darunavir/ritonavir arms, respectively [estimated difference -4.21 mg/dL; 95% confidence interval (CI) -12.11 to +3.69 mg/dL; P = 0.75]. However, the ratio of total to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol tended to show a greater decrease with atazanavir/ritonavir compared with darunavir/ritonavir (estimated difference -1.02; 95% CI -2.35 to +0.13; P = 0.07). Total bilirubin significantly increased with atazanavir/ritonavir (estimated difference +1.87 mg/dL; 95% CI +1.58 to +2.16 mg/dL; P < 0.01), but bilirubin changes were not associated with lipid changes. Secondary endpoints other than total bilirubin were not significantly different between arms.. Atazanavir/ritonavir and darunavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir/emtricitabine did not show significant differences in total cholesterol change or overall tolerability at 24 weeks. However, there was a trend towards a lower total to HDL cholesterol ratio with atazanavir/ritonavir and this effect was unrelated to bilirubin.

Topics: Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; Bilirubin; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Spain; Sulfonamides

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has been associated with renal insufficiency. Co-administration with boosted protease inhibitors, which increases its exposure, may further increase the risk of renal insufficiency.. We compared the incidence of renal events among women taking TDF co-administered with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) versus those co-administering TDF with nevirapine (NVP). Renal events were defined as a confirmed drop in creatinine clearance associated with a serum creatinine grade 2 or higher, or that leading to treatment modification.. Overall, 741 HIV-infected women were enrolled into the study. Of these, 24 (3.2%) had reportable renal events (18 in LPV/r arm, six in NVP arm). In multivariate analysis, renal events were significantly associated with the LPV/r arm [odds ratio (OR) 3.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21, 8.05; P = 0.019], baseline HIV-1 RNA (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.23, 5.69 per 1 log10 copies/ml higher; P = 0.013) and baseline creatinine clearance (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.98 per 10 ml/min higher; P = 0.030). In multivariate analysis evaluating renal events requiring treatment modification, only baseline HIV-1 RNA and creatinine clearance were significantly associated (OR 4.41, 95% CI 1.65, 11.78 per 1 log10 copies/ml higher; P = 0.003 and OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64, 0.99 per 10 ml/min higher; P = 0.040, respectively).. The rates of renal events were relatively low in the two treatment arms. However, patients taking TDF co-administered with LPV/r had significantly more renal events compared to those co-administered with NVP. Furthermore, higher baseline HIV RNA and lower creatinine clearance were associated with the development of renal insufficiency requiring treatment modification.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Antiviral Agents; Creatinine; Deoxycytidine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Lopinavir; Nevirapine; Organophosphonates; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

HIV-1 shedding in genital secretions is associated with HIV transmission risk. Limited data exist on the effect of second-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (mLPV/r) on genital secretion of HIV RNA.. We measured HIV-1 in genital secretions of HIV-infected adults at time of failure from non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens and at 48 weeks after being randomized to second-line mLPV/r versus tenofovir/lamivudine/LPV/r (TDF/3TC/LPV/r). Plasma and genital secretion (semen, vaginal swab) HIV RNA was quantified by the CobasAmpliprep/TaqMan assay.. Forty enrolled (15 on mLPV/r and 25 on TDF/3TC/LPV/r). Median age was 37.8 years and 35% were male. Median baseline CD4(+) T-cell count was 222 cells/mm(3), plasma HIV RNA was 4.1 log10 copies/ml and genital secretion HIV RNA was 2.3 log10 copies/ml. At week 48, the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA<50 copies/ml was 13/15 (87%) in mLPV/r and 21/25 (84%) in TDF/3TC/LPV/r arms. Median genital HIV RNA was significantly decreased from baseline in both arms (P=0.009 in mLPV/r and P=0.001 in TDF/3TC/LPV/r). In subjects with suppressed plasma HIV RNA, 12/34 (35%; 6/13 [46%] in the mLPV/r and 6/21 [29%] in the TDF/3TC/LPV/r arms) had detectable HIV RNA (range 74-957 copies/ml) in the genital secretions (P=0.41). By multivariate analysis, the only predictor of having genital HIV RNA>50 copies/ml at week 48 was baseline genital secretion HIV RNA>50 copies/ml (P=0.049).. LPV/r either given alone or in combination with TDF/3TC as second-line treatment achieved high genital secretion HIV RNA suppression rate. Genital secretion HIV RNA remained detectable at low levels in one-third of patients with suppressed plasma viraemia.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Genitalia; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Organophosphonates; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Virus Shedding

Rifampicin and protease inhibitors are difficult to use concomitantly in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis because of drug-drug interactions. Rifabutin has been proposed as an alternative rifamycin, but there is concern that the current recommended dose is suboptimal. The principal aim of this study was to compare bioavailability of two doses of rifabutin (150 mg three times per week and 150 mg daily) in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis who initiated lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy in Vietnam. Concentrations of lopinavir/ritonavir were also measured.. This was a randomized, open-label, multi-dose, two-arm, cross-over trial, conducted in Vietnamese adults with HIV-associated tuberculosis in Ho Chi Minh City (Clinical trial registry number NCT00651066). Rifabutin pharmacokinetics were evaluated before and after the introduction of lopinavir/ritonavir -based antiretroviral therapy using patient randomization lists. Serial rifabutin and 25-O-desacetyl rifabutin concentrations were measured during a dose interval after 2 weeks of rifabutin 300 mg daily, after 3 weeks of rifabutin 150 mg daily with lopinavir/ritonavir and after 3 weeks of rifabutin 150 mg three times per week with lopinavir/ritonavir.. Sixteen and seventeen patients were respectively randomized to the two arms, and pharmacokinetic analysis carried out in 12 and 13 respectively. Rifabutin 150 mg daily with lopinavir/ritonavir was associated with a 32% mean increase in rifabutin average steady state concentration compared with rifabutin 300 mg alone. In contrast, the rifabutin average steady state concentration decreased by 44% when rifabutin was given at 150 mg three times per week with lopinavir/ritonavir. With both dosing regimens, 2 - 5 fold increases of the 25-O-desacetyl- rifabutin metabolite were observed when rifabutin was given with lopinavir/ritonavir compared with rifabutin alone. The different doses of rifabutin had no significant effect on lopinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations.. Based on these findings, rifabutin 150 mg daily may be preferred when co-administered with lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00651066.

Topics: Adult; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Area Under Curve; Asian People; Biological Availability; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis; Vietnam

The treatment of non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-defining cancers may be complicated by drug interactions between highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and chemotherapy. This trial is the first by the AIDS Malignancy Consortium to assess targeted therapies and HAART in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00890747).. In a modified phase 1 study of sunitinib, patients were stratified into 2 treatment arms based on whether they were receiving therapy with ritonavir, a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor. Patients in treatment arm 1 (non-ritonavir HAART) received standard sunitinib dosing (50 mg/day). Treatment arm 2 (ritonavir-based HAART) used a phase 1, 3 + 3 dose escalation design (from 25 mg/day to 50 mg/day). Cycles were comprised of 4 weeks on treatment followed by a 2-week break (6 weeks total). The pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its active metabolite (N-desethyl sunitinib) were assessed.. Nineteen patients were enrolled and were evaluable. Patients on treatment arm 1 tolerated treatment with no dose-limiting toxicity observed. In treatment arm 2, a dose-limiting toxicity was experienced at a dose of 37.5 mg, and an additional 3 of 5 patients experienced grade 3 neutropenia (toxicity graded as per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]), an uncommon toxicity of sunitinib. No patient achieved a response, but 10 patients had stable disease, including 8 with prolonged disease stability. Efavirenz, a potent inducer of CYP3A4, resulted in increased exposure of N-desethyl sunitinib, whereas ritonavir caused decreased exposure of the metabolite. Hand-foot syndrome was associated with higher steady-state trough concentrations of sunitinib.. Patients receiving non-ritonavir-based HAART regimens tolerated standard dosing of sunitinib. Patients receiving ritonavir-based therapy who were treated with a dose of 37.5 mg/day experienced higher toxicities. Dose reductions of sunitinib to 37.5 mg may be warranted in patients receiving ritonavir.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyrroles; Ritonavir; Sunitinib

While studies of HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral treatment (ART) report no sex differences in immune recovery and virologic response but more ART-associated complications in women, sex differences in disease progression and response to ART among children have not been well assessed. The objective of this study was to evaluate for sex differences in response to ART in South African HIV-infected children who were randomized to continue ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r)-based ART or switch to nevirapine-based ART.. ART outcomes in HIV-infected boys and girls in Johannesburg, South Africa from 2005-2010 were compared. Children initiated ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r)-based ART before 24 months of age and were randomized to remain on LPV/r or switch to nevirapine-based ART after achieving viral suppression. Children were followed for 76 weeks post-randomization and then long-term follow up continued for a minimum of 99 weeks and maximum of 245 weeks after randomization. Viral load, CD4 count, lipids, anthropometrics, drug concentrations, and adherence were measured at regular intervals. Outcomes were compared between sexes within treatment strata.. A total of 323 children (median age 8.8 months, IQR 5.1-13.5), including 168 boys and 155 girls, initiated LPV/r-based ART and 195 children were randomized. No sex differences in risk of virological failure (confirmed viral load >1000 copies/mL) by 156 weeks post-randomization were observed within either treatment group. Girls switched to nevirapine had more robust CD4 count improvement relative to boys in this group through 112 weeks post-randomization. In addition, girls remaining on LPV/r had higher plasma concentrations of ritonavir than boys during post-randomization visits. After a mean of 3.4 years post-randomization, girls remaining on LPV/r also had a higher total cholesterol:HDL ratio and lower mean HDL than boys on LPV/r.. Sex differences are noted in treated HIV-infected children even at a young age, and appear to depend on treatment regimen. Future studies are warranted to determine biological mechanisms and clinical significance of these differences.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00117728.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; Sex Factors; South Africa; Treatment Outcome

Antiretroviral drug regimen choice may influence changes in body composition. The objective of this study was to compare changes in body composition between ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) over 96 weeks using data from a substudy of CASTLE, which compared once-daily ATV/r with twice-daily LPV/r, both in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine in treatment-naïve patients with HIV-1 infection.. We examined 224 patients (125 on ATV/r; 99 on LPV/r) at baseline, 48 and 96 weeks using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computerised tomography.. In the lowest baseline body mass index (BMI) group, there were significantly greater gains at week 96 for ATV/r than for LPV/r in subcutaneous adipose tissue and in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). By week 96, patients with lowest baseline CD4 cell counts on ATV/r had 28 % increases in VAT versus 14 % reductions for patients receiving LPV/r. Those with the lowest baseline BMI on ATV/r had 19 % increases in VAT versus reductions of 5 % for patients on LPV/r. In the highest baseline BMI group, the mean increase in triglycerides was 6 and 70 % in the ATV/r and LPV/r arms, respectively. Compared with baseline, an increase in proportion of patients with high waist circumference (WC)/high triglycerides at 96 weeks was noted in both treatment arms, but this increase was numerically greater with LVP/r (18 %) than with ATV/r (11 %).. Truncal fat gains on ATV/r primarily led to increases in WC, which may reflect return to health, while on LPV/r increases in WC and triglycerides occurred. Changes in body composition with antiretroviral therapy are influenced by treatment choice and baseline characteristics.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Body Composition; Deoxycytidine; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Young Adult

Limited comparative, prospective data exist regarding cardiovascular risk factors in HIV-infected women starting antiretroviral therapy in Africa.. In 7 African countries, 741 women with CD4 <200 cells/mm were randomized to tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) plus either nevirapine (NVP, n = 370) or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r, n = 371). Lipids and blood pressure (BP) were evaluated at entry, 48, 96, and 144 weeks. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to evaluate mean risk factor changes and clinically relevant risk factor changes.. At entry, both NVP and LPV/r groups were similar regarding age [mean = 33.5 (SD = 7.1) years], CD4 [129 (67) cells/mm], and HIV-1 RNA [5.1 (0.6) log10 copies/mL]. Nearly, all women had normal lipids and BP except for high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. Over 144 weeks, the LPV/r compared with NVP group had significantly greater mean lipid increases (eg, non-HDL: +29 vs. +13 mg/dL) and smaller HDL increases (+12 vs. +21 mg/dL). In contrast, the NVP compared with LPV/r group had greater mean increases in BP (eg, diastolic BP: +5 vs. -0.5 mm Hg). Significantly, more women assigned LPV/r had week 144 "abnormal" lipid levels (eg, HDL 29.7% vs. 14.8% and triglycerides 28.6% vs. 8.2%), and significantly, more women assigned NVP had "abnormal" BP (eg, diastolic BP 22.7% vs. 6.5%). Most differences remained significant when adjusted for baseline risk factor, age, CD4, and HIV-1 RNA.. In HIV-infected women initiating antiretroviral therapy in Africa, LPV/r + TDF/FTC was associated with less favorable changes in lipids, and use of NVP + TDF/FTC was associated with less favorable changes in BP.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Africa South of the Sahara; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Cardiovascular Diseases; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Deoxycytidine; Emtricitabine; Endpoint Determination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Linear Models; Logistic Models; Lopinavir; Multivariate Analysis; Nevirapine; Organophosphonates; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Triglycerides

A lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r)-based regimen is recommended during pregnancy to reduce the risk of HIV mother-to-child transmission, but the appropriate dose is controversial. We compared the pharmacokinetics of standard and increased LPV/r doses during pregnancy. This randomized, open-label prospective study enrolled 60 pregnant women between gestational weeks 14 and 30. The participants received either the standard dose (400/100 mg twice a day [BID]) or increased dose (600/150 mg BID) of LPV/r tablets during pregnancy and the standard dose for 6 weeks after childbirth. Pharmacokinetics analysis was performed using a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Adherent participants who received the standard dose presented minimum LPV concentrations of 4.4, 4.3, and 6.1 μg/ml in the second and third trimesters and postpartum, respectively. The increased-dose group exhibited values of 7.9, 6.9, and 9.2 μg/ml at the same three time points. Although LPV exposure was significantly higher in the increased-dose group, the standard dose produced therapeutic levels of LPV against wild-type virus in all adherent participants, except one patient in the third trimester; 50%, 37.5%, and 25%, and 0%, 15%, and 0% of the participants in the standard- and increased-dose groups failed to achieve therapeutic levels against resistant viruses during the second and third trimesters and after childbirth, respectively. After 12 weeks of treatment and after childbirth, all adherent participants achieved undetectable HIV viral loads, and their babies (49/54) were uninfected. No serious drug-related adverse events were observed. We conclude that the standard dose is appropriate for use during pregnancy and that an increased dose may be necessary for women harboring resistant HIV. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00605098.).

Topics: Adult; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Pregnancy; Ritonavir; Young Adult

Lopinavir/ritonavir plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors is one standard antiretroviral therapy regimen, both in patients with HIV alone and coinfected with hepatitis B or C. Our objective was to investigate whether hepatitis coinfection without clinical signs of hepatic impairment is a cofactor altering lopinavir pharmacokinetics and influencing therapy outcome.. Steady-state 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles of lopinavir/ritonavir were assessed in patients with (group 1, n = 20) or without (group 2, n = 36) hepatitis coinfection, taking lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice a day plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, measured by means of high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Demographic (sex, age, weight), pharmacological (formulation, comedication), clinical, and virological/immunologic parameters (HIV-RNA PCR, CD4(+) cell count) were compared between the groups and included in regression analyses for correlations with lopinavir pharmacokinetic parameters (C(min), C(max), AUC, CL, and t(1/2)) and viral load evolution over 48 weeks on therapy. Patient pairs were matched 1:2 for the parameters sex, age, weight, ethnicity, and drug formulation.. None of the hepatitis-related cofactors (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, γGT, HBe Ag, HBsAg, HCV-RNA PCR, HCV-therapy) had an influence on lopinavir pharmacokinetics in this group of patients. Lopinavir C(min) (P = 0.039) and area under the curve (P = 0.038) and ritonavir C(max) (P = 0.049) were significantly enhanced in hepatitis-coinfected patients, but correlated only with drug formulation (ie, soft gel capsule or Meltrex tablet formulation, multivariate regression analysis, P = 0.001), not hepatitis coinfection.. Despite moderately enhanced lopinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations, regular therapeutic drug monitoring is not to be considered in hepatitis-coinfected patients without hepatic impairment. Antiviral efficacy is comparable between both groups, a less-pronounced CD4(+) cell increase in hepatitis-coinfected patients is in line with previously published data.

Topics: Adult; Case-Control Studies; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Coinfection; Drug Combinations; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Liver; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) exhibit different protein binding affinities and achieve variable plasma and tissue concentrations. Degree of plasma protein binding may impact central nervous system penetration. This cross-sectional study assessed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) unbound PI concentrations, HIV-1 RNA, and neopterin levels in subjects receiving either ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV), 95% plasma protein bound, or atazanavir (ATV), 86% bound. Unbound PI trough concentrations were measured using rapid equilibrium dialysis and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma and CSF HIV-1 RNA and neopterin were measured by Ampliprep/COBAS® Taqman® 2.0 assay (Roche) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ALPCO), respectively. CSF/plasma unbound drug concentration ratio was higher for ATV, 0.09 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.12] than DRV, 0.04 (95%CI 0.03-0.06). Unbound CSF concentrations were lower than protein adjusted wild-type inhibitory concentration-50 (IC50 ) in all ATV and 1 DRV-treated subjects (P < 0.001). CSF HIV-1 RNA was detected in 2/15 ATV and 4/15 DRV subjects (P = 0.65). CSF neopterin levels were low and similar between arms. ATV relative to DRV had higher CSF/plasma unbound drug ratio. Low CSF HIV-1 RNA and neopterin suggest that both regimens resulted in CSF virologic suppression and controlled inflammation.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Blood Proteins; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neopterin; Oligopeptides; Protein Binding; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

Dolutegravir has been shown to be non-inferior to an integrase inhibitor and superior to a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). In FLAMINGO, we compared dolutegravir with darunavir plus ritonavir in individuals naive for antiretroviral therapy.. In this multicentre, open-label, phase 3b, non-inferiority study, HIV-1-infected antiretroviral therapy-naive adults with HIV-1 RNA concentration of 1000 copies per mL or more and no resistance at screening were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either dolutegravir 50 mg once daily or darunavir 800 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg once daily, with investigator-selected tenofovir-emtricitabine or abacavir-lamivudine. Randomisation was stratified by screening HIV-1 RNA (≤100,000 or >100,000 copies per mL) and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) selection. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA concentration lower than 50 copies per mL (Food and Drug Administration [FDA] snapshot algorithm) at week 48 with a 12% non-inferiority margin. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01449929.. Recruitment began on Oct 31, 2011, and was completed on May 24, 2012, in 64 research centres in nine countries worldwide. Of 595 patients screened, 484 patients were included in the analysis (242 in each group). At week 48, 217 (90%) patients receiving dolutegravir and 200 (83%) patients receiving darunavir plus ritonavir had HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL (adjusted difference 7·1%, 95% CI 0·9-13·2), non-inferiority and on pre-specified secondary analysis dolutegravir was superior (p=0·025). Confirmed virological failure occurred in two (<1%) patients in each group; we recorded no treatment-emergent resistance in either group. Discontinuation due to adverse events or stopping criteria was less frequent for dolutegravir (four [2%] patients) than for darunavir plus ritonavir (ten [4%] patients) and contributed to the difference in response rates. The most commonly reported (≥10%) adverse events were diarrhoea (dolutegravir 41 [17%] patients vs darunavir plus ritonavir 70 [29%] patients), nausea (39 [16%] vs 43 [18%]), and headache (37 [15%] vs 24 [10%]). Patients receiving dolutegravir had significantly fewer low-density lipoprotein values of grade 2 or higher (11 [2%] vs 36 [7%]; p=0·0001).. Once-daily dolutegravir was superior to once-daily darunavir plus ritonavir. Once-daily dolutegravir in combination with fixed-dose NRTIs represents an effective new treatment option for HIV-1-infected, treatment-naive patients.. ViiV Healthcare and Shionogi & Co.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Anti-HIV Agents; Creatinine; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Ritonavir; Serum Albumin; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are highly efficacious and safe, but data from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children concurrently receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) and ACTs are limited.. We evaluated 28-day outcomes following malaria treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (AL) or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) in 2 cohorts of HIV-infected Ugandan children taking various ART regimens. In one cohort, children <6 years of age were randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based ART and treated with AL for uncomplicated malaria. In another cohort, children <12 months of age were started on nevirapine-based ART if they were eligible, and randomized to AL or DP for the treatment of their first and all subsequent uncomplicated malaria episodes.. There were 773 and 165 treatments for malaria with AL and DP, respectively. Initial response to therapy was excellent, with 99% clearance of parasites and <1% risk of repeat therapy within 3 days. Recurrent parasitemia within 28 days was common following AL treatment. The risk of recurrent parasitemia was significantly lower among children taking LPV/r-based ART compared with children taking nevirapine-based ART following AL treatment (15.3% vs 35.5%, P = .009), and those treated with DP compared with AL (8.6% vs 36.2%, P < .001). Both ACT regimens were safe and well tolerated.. Treatment of uncomplicated malaria with AL or DP was efficacious and safe in HIV-infected children taking ART. However, there was a high risk of recurrent parasitemia following AL treatment, which was significantly lower in children taking LPV/r-based ART compared with nevirapine-based ART.

Topics: Antimalarials; Artemisinins; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Malaria; Male; Nevirapine; Parasitemia; Quinolines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Uganda

Daily oral triple therapy is effective at halting HIV disease progression, but can have toxic effects and is costly. We investigated whether dual therapy with lopinavir and ritonavir plus lamivudine is non-inferior to standard triple therapy.. The GARDEL study (Global AntiRetroviral Design Encompassing Lopinavir/r and Lamivudine vs LPV/r based standard therapy) is a 48 week, phase 3, randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial in antiretroviral-therapy-naive adults (age ≥18 years) with documented HIV-1 RNA viral load of at least 1000 copies per mL. The study was done at 19 centres in six countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to dual therapy or triple therapy by sealed envelopes, in blocks of four, stratified by baseline viral load (<100,000 vs ≥100,000 copies per mL). Dual therapy consisted of lopinavir 400 mg and ritonavir 100 mg plus lamivudine 150 mg, both twice daily. Triple therapy consisted of lopinavir 400 mg and ritonavir 100 mg twice daily and lamivudine or emtricitabine plus another nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) in fixed-dose combination. Efficacy was analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The primary endpoint was virological response rate, defined as the proportion of patients with HIV RNA less than 50 copies per mL at 48 weeks. Dual therapy was classed as non-inferior to triple therapy if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the difference between groups was no lower than -12%. Patients and investigators were unmasked to treatment allocation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01237444.. Between Dec 10, 2010, and May 15, 2012, 217 patients were randomly assigned to the dual-therapy group and 209 to the triple-therapy group. 198 patients in the dual-therapy group and 175 in the triple-therapy group completed 48 weeks of treatment. At week 48, 189 patients (88·3%) in the dual-therapy group and 169 (83·7%) in the triple-therapy group had viral response (difference 4·6%, 95% CI -2·2 to 11·8; p=0·171). Patients with baseline viral load of at least 100,000 copies per mL showed similar results (87·2% vs 77·9%, respectively; difference 9·3%, 95% CI -2·8 to 21·5; p=0·145). Toxicity-related or tolerability-related discontinuations were more common in the triple-therapy group (n=10 [4·9%]) than in the dual-therapy group (n=1 [0·4%]; difference 4·5%, 95% CI -8·1 to -0·9; p=0·011). 65 adverse events in the dual-therapy group and 88 in the triple-therapy group were possibly or probably drug related (p=0·007). Two serious adverse events occurred, both in the dual-therapy arm, one of which (a case of gastritis) was reported as possibly or probably related to drug treatment.. Dual therapy with lopinavir and ritonavir plus lamivudine regimen warrants further clinical research and consideration as a potential therapeutic option for antiretroviral-therapy-naive patients.. Fundación Huésped and AbbVie.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Young Adult

Data on the interaction between the etonogestrel (ENG) implant and antiretroviral therapy are lacking. We evaluated the effect of 2 highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens (1 including efavirenz and the other ritonavir-boosted lopinavir) on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of an ENG-releasing implant in HIV-positive women.. Prospective nonrandomized PK study.. Forty-five HIV-positive women who desired to use ENG implants were included: 15 had received zidovudine/lamivudine + lopinavir/ritonavir for ≥3 months (LPV/r-based HAART group), 15 had received zidovudine/lamivudine + efavirenz for ≥3 months (EFV-based HAART group), and 15 had not received HAART (non-HAART group). PK parameters were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry at baseline and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks after implant placement.. The EFV-based HAART regimen was associated with a reduction in the bioavailability of ENG, which showed decreases of 63.4%, 53.7%, and 70% in the area under the curve (AUC), maximum concentration (Cmax), and minimum concentration (Cmin) of ENG, respectively, compared with the non-HAART group. The LPV/r-based HAART regimen was associated with an increase in ENG bioavailability, which showed 52%, 60.6%, and 33.8% increases in the ENG AUC, Cmax, and Cmin, respectively, compared with the non-HAART group.. The coadministration of EFV decreased the bioavailability of ENG released from the implant, which could impair contraceptive efficacy. However, the coadministration of LPV/r increased the bioavailability of ENG released from the implant, which suggests that this antiretroviral combination does not impair the ENG implant efficacy.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Biological Availability; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Cyclopropanes; Desogestrel; Drug Combinations; Drug Implants; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Ritonavir; Young Adult

Simplified maintenance therapy with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) provides an alternative treatment option for HIV-1 infection that spares nucleoside analogs (NRTI) for future use and decreased toxicity. We hypothesized that the level of immune activation (IA) and recovery of lymphocyte populations could influence virologic outcomes after regimen simplification.. Thirty-four participants with virologic suppression ≥ 48 weeks on antiretroviral therapy (2 NRTI plus protease inhibitor) were switched to ATV/r alone in the context of the ACTG 5201 clinical trial. Flow cytometric analyses were performed on PBMC isolated from 25 patients with available samples, of which 24 had lymphocyte recovery sufficient for this study. Assessments included enumeration of T-cells (CD4/CD8), natural killer (NK) (CD3+CD56+CD16+) cells and cell-associated markers (HLA-DR, CD's 38/69/94/95/158/279).. Eight of the 24 patients had at least one plasma HIV-1 RNA level (VL) >50 copies/mL during the study. NK cell levels below the group median of 7.1% at study entry were associated with development of VL >50 copies/mL following simplification by regression and survival analyses (p = 0.043 and 0.023), with an odds ratio of 10.3 (95% CI: 1.92-55.3). Simplification was associated with transient increases in naïve and CD25+ CD4+ T-cells, and had no impact on IA levels.. Lower NK cell levels prior to regimen simplification were predictive of virologic rebound after discontinuation of nucleoside analogs. Regimen simplification did not have a sustained impact on markers of IA or T lymphocyte populations in 48 weeks of clinical monitoring.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00084019.

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4-CD8 Ratio; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Killer Cells, Natural; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral

Conflicting reports on the effects of efavirenz (EFV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) on subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) have been described.. The aim was to assess the 48-week molecular and clinical effects of LPV/r and EFV, combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC), on SAT of HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive patients.. Forty-four adults were started on LPV/r or EFV combined with TDF/FTC. Fasting metabolic tests, HIV RNA, CD4 cell count, and fat measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry scans were obtained at study entry and week 48. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and transcripts for mtDNA-encoded proteins and genes involved in inflammation, adipocyte differentiation, and metabolism were assessed in paired SAT biopsies.. Whole-body fat and limb fat mass increased in the LPV/r and EFV groups. MtDNA and cytochrome oxidase subunit II did not change, and cytochrome b increased significantly in EFV-treated patients. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 gene expression did not change in the LPV/r group, but these significantly increased in the EFV group. Interleukin 18 decreased in the LPV/r group, whereas it increased in the EFV group.. Starting TDF/FTC plus EFV was associated with an increased expression of genes encoding for inflammatory cytokines in SAT in naive patients. Therapy with TDF/FTC plus LPV/r or EFV was associated with an increase in subcutaneous fat mass.

Topics: Adenine; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Deoxycytidine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Gene Expression Regulation; HIV Infections; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Lopinavir; Organophosphonates; Ritonavir; Subcutaneous Fat; Tenofovir; Transcriptome

Guidelines recommend lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) as first- and second-line therapy for young and older HIV-infected children, respectively. Available formulations have limitations making their widespread use complex.. An open-label comparative bioavailability (randomized crossover) study compared a novel twice-daily minitab sprinkle formulation (40 mg/10 mg, Cipla Pharmaceuticals) versus innovator syrup in HIV-infected Ugandan infants aged 3 to <12 months (cohort A) and children aged 1-4 years (cohort B) and versus Cipla tablets (100/25 mg) in children aged 4 to <13 years (cohort C). Twelve-hour intensive pharmacokinetic sampling after observed LPV/r intake (plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors) following World Health Organization 2010 dosing with food was performed 4 weeks after enrollment. Children then switched formulation; sampling was repeated at week 8. Acceptability data were also collected.. Seventy-seven infants/children were included in cohort A (n = 19)/B (n = 26)/C (n = 32). Among 132 evaluable pharmacokinetic profiles, there were 13/21/25 within-child comparisons in cohort A/B/C. For minitabs versus syrup, geometric mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] AUC0-12h was 88.6 (66.7-117.6) versus 77.6 (49.5-121.5) h·mg/L in cohort A [geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% CI) = 1.14 (0.71 to 1.85)] and 138.7 (118.2 to 162.6) versus 109.1 (93.7 to 127.1) h·mg/L in cohort B [GMR (90% CI) = 1.27 (1.10 to 1.46)]. For minitabs versus tablets, geometric mean (95% CI) AUC0-12h was 83.1 (66.7 to 103.5) versus 115.6 (103.0 to 129.7) h·mg/L; GMR (90% CI) = 0.72 (0.60 to 0.86). Subtherapeutic levels (<1.0 mg/L) occurred in 0 (0%)/2 (15%) minitabs/syrup in infants (P = 0.48), no children aged 1-4 years and 4 (16%)/1 (4%) minitabs/tablets (P = 0.35). About 13/17 (76%) and 19/26 (73%) caregivers of infants and children aged 1-4 years, respectively, chose to continue minitabs after week 8, mainly for convenience; only 7/29 (24%) older children (five <6 years) remained on minitabs.. LPV/r exposure from minitabs was comparable with syrup, but lower than tablets, with no significant differences in subtherapeutic concentrations. Minitabs were more acceptable than syrups for younger children, but older children preferred tablets.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Confidence Intervals; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Compounding; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Ritonavir; Tablets; Uganda; World Health Organization

Patients with HIV on antiretroviral therapy might benefit from regimen simplification to reduce pill burden and dosing frequency. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of simplifying the treatment regimen for adults with virologically suppressed HIV infection from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor and emtricitabine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir) regimen to coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir.. STRATEGY-PI is a 96 week, international, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial in which HIV-infected adults with a plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load of less than 50 copies per mL for at least 6 months who were taking a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor with emtricitabine plus tenofovir were randomly assigned (2:1) either to switch to coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir or to continue on their existing regimen. Key eligibility criteria included no history of virological failure, no resistance to emtricitabine and tenofovir, and creatinine clearance of 70 mL/min or higher. Neither participants nor investigators were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a viral load of less than 50 copies per mL at week 48, based on a US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm for the modified intention-to-treat population, which excluded major protocol violations (prohibited resistance or not receiving a protease inhibitor at baseline). We prespecified non-inferiority with a 12% margin; if non-inferiority was established, superiority was tested as per a prespecified sequential testing procedure. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01475838.. Between Dec 12, 2011, and Dec 20, 2012, 433 participants were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of study drug. Of these participants, 293 were assigned to switch to the simplified regimen (switch group) and 140 to remain on their existing regimen (no-switch group); after exclusions, 290 and 139 participants, respectively, were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. At week 48, 272 (93·8%) of 290 participants in the switch group maintained a viral load of less than 50 copies per mL, compared with 121 (87·1%) of 139 in the no-switch group (difference 6·7%, 95% CI 0·4-13·7; p=0·025). The statistical superiority of the simplified regimen was mainly caused by a higher proportion of participants in the no-switch group than in the switch group discontinuing treatment for non-virological reasons; virological failure was rare in both groups (two [1%] of 290 vs two [1%] of 139). We did not detect any treatment-emergent resistance in either group. Adverse events leading to discontinuation were rare in both groups (six [2%] of 293 vs four [3%] of 140). Switching to the simplified regimen was associated with a small, non-progressive increase from baseline in serum creatinine concentration. Nausea was more common in the switch group than in the no-switch group, but rates of diarrhoea and bloating decreased compared with baseline from week 4 to week 48 in the switch group, whereas there were generally no changes for these symptoms in the no-switch group.. Coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir might be a useful regimen simplification option for virologically supressed adults with HIV taking a multitablet ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor regimen.. Gilead Sciences.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Cobicistat; Deoxycytidine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Protease Inhibitors; Quinolones; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Thiazoles; Viral Load

A subset of HIV-1 infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) experience suboptimal CD4 response (SCR) despite virologic suppression. We studied the rate of and risk factors for SCR among women starting HAART in the ACTG A5208 study conducted in 7 African countries. 741 HAART-naive women with screening CD4 count <200 cells/μL were randomized to start HAART with Tenofovir/Emtricitabine plus either Nevirapine or Lopinavir/Ritonavir.. This analysis includes the 625 women who remained on-study through 48 weeks without experiencing protocol-defined virologic failure. We defined SCR as<100 CD4 cells/μL increase from baseline and absolute CD4 cell count<350 cells/μL, both at 48 weeks after HAART initiation.. The baseline characteristics for the 625 women prior to HAART initiation were: median age 33 years, screening CD4 count 134 cells/μL, and HIV-1 RNA 5.1 log10 copies/mL; 184 (29%) were WHO Stage 3 or 4.Seventy one (11%) of these 625 women experienced SCR. Baseline factors independently associated with increased odds of SCR included older age, lower HIV-1 RNA, positive Hepatitis B surface antigen, and site location. At 96 weeks, only 6% of the SCR group had CD4 ≥ 350 cells/μL compared with 67% in the non SCR group.. After starting HAART, 11% of women with virologic suppression through 48 weeks experienced SCR. These patients were also less likely to achieve CD4 ≥ 350 cells/μL by 96 weeks. The underlying causes and long term clinical implications of SCR deserve further investigation.. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00089505.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Africa; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Deoxycytidine; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Nevirapine; Organophosphonates; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women are at increased risk of malaria and its complications. In vitro and in vivo data suggest that the HIV protease inhibitors lopinavir/ritonavir may have potent antimalarial activity. We sought to evaluate whether lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduced the risk of placental malaria.. HIV-infected, ART-naive pregnant women were enrolled between gestational weeks 12 and 28 and randomly assigned to receive lopinavir/ritonavir-based or efavirenz-based ART. Women received daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis and insecticide-treated bed nets at enrollment and were followed up to 1 year after delivery. The primary outcome was placental malaria, defined by the detection of malaria parasites, using microscopy or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of placental blood specimens. Secondary outcomes included placental malaria, defined by histopathologic results; adverse birth outcomes; incidence of malaria; and prevalence of asymptomatic parasitemia. Analyses were done using an intention-to-treat approach.. Of 389 subjects randomly assigned to a treatment group, 377 were followed through to delivery. There was no significant difference in the risk of placental malaria, as defined by thick smear or PCR findings, between the lopinavir/ritonavir-based and efavirenz-based ART arms (7.4% vs 9.8%; P = .45). Similarly, there were no differences in secondary outcomes between the 2 treatment arms.. Lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART did not reduce the risk of placental or maternal malaria or improve birth outcomes, compared with efavirenz-based ART.. NCT00993031.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antimalarials; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lopinavir; Malaria; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Young Adult

Protease inhibitor monotherapy is associated with more frequent episodes of viral rebounds above 50 copies/mL than triple therapy.. To evaluate if, compared to triple-drug therapy, protease inhibitor monotherapy is associated with increased levels of inflammatory/procoagulant markers and more frequent plasma residual viremia detection.. In this cross-sectional study, we included patients treated for ≥ 1 year with darunavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir as monotherapy (n=72) or with two nucleos(t)ides (n=74). All samples were tested for CRP, IL-6, fibrinogen and D-dimer. Residual viremia was determined using an ultrasensitive qualitative nested-PCR of the HIV pol gene with a limit of detection of 1 copy of HIV-RNA.. We found no differences in levels of inflammatory/procoagulant markers or in the proportion of patients with plasma residual viremia detection by treatment group.. The long-term treatment with protease inhibitor monotherapy in the setting of routine clinical practice is not associated with a higher prevalence of plasma residual viremia or more elevated inflammatory/procoagulant markers levels than triple drug therapy.

Topics: Adult; Biomarkers; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cytokines; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Inflammation; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viremia

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Atazanavir Sulfate; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Guideline Adherence; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

To compare WHO first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)-based regimen with a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) regimen in a resource-limited setting regarding treatment outcome and emergence of drug resistance mutations (DRMs).. Treatment-naive adults were randomized to nevirapine (NVP) or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) regimens each in combination with tenofovir (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) or zidovudine (ZDV)/lamivudine (3TC). Primary endpoint was the incidence of therapeutical (clinical and/or virologic) failure at week 48 with follow-up till week 96.. Four hundred and twenty-five patients (120 men; 305 women) received at least one dose of the study drug. mITT analysis showed no difference in proportion of therapeutical failure between treatment arms [67/209 (32%) in NVP vs. 63/216 (29%) LPV/r at week 48 (P = 0.53); 88/209 (42%) in NVP vs. 83/216 (38%) in LPV/r at week 96 (P = 0.49)]. Per-protocol analysis demonstrated significantly more virologic failure with NVP than with LPV/r regimens [at week 48: 19/167 (11%) vs. 7/166 (4%), P = 0.014; at week 96: 27/158 (17%) vs. 13/159 (8%), P =  0.019)]. Drug resistance mutations to NNRTI were detected in 19 out of 22 (86.3%) and dual-class resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) and NNRTI in 15 out of 27 (68.2%) of NVP failing patients. K65R mutation was present in seven out of 14 patients failing NVP-TDF/FTC regimen. No major protease inhibitor-DRM was detected among LPV/r failing patients. Discontinuation for adverse events was similar between treatment groups.. In resource-limited settings, first-line NNRTI-NRTI regimen as compared with bPI-based regimen provides similar outcome but is associated with a significantly higher number of virologic failure and resistance mutations in both classes that jeopardize future options for second-line therapy.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Deoxycytidine; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nevirapine; Organophosphonates; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Zidovudine

The objective of this study was to assess the 48-week virological efficacy of atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) monotherapy vs. ATV/r along with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NRTIs) in HIV-1 treated individuals with HIV-RNA less than 50 copies/ml.. A multicentre, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial. HIV-1 treated individuals on ATV/r 300/100 mg along with two NRTIs were randomized to receive ATV/r monotherapy or to maintain their antiretroviral regimen. The primary endpoint was the confirmed viral rebound (CVR: two consecutive HIV-RNA >50 copies/ml) or treatment discontinuation for any reason. Individuals who experienced CVR on ATV/r monotherapy reintroduced NRTIs and discontinued the study if HIV-RNA was more than 50 copies/ml after 12 weeks since reintensification.. One hundred and three patients enrolled. By week 48, 11 patients in ATV/r arm and two in ATV/r along with two NRTIs experienced CVR; four (8%) patients in ATV/r and eight (15%) in ATV/r along with two NRTIs discontinued. At the 48-week primary efficacy analysis (re-intensification = failure), treatment success was 73% in ATV/r arm and 85% in ATV/r along with two NRTIs [difference -12.1%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -27.8 to 2.1]. According to the analysis considering re-intensification is equal to success, treatment success was 92% in ATV/r arm and 85% in the ATV/r along with two NRTIs arm (difference 7.5%, 95% CI -4.7 to 19.8). At CVR, no mutation was observed in ATV/r arm and reintensification with NRTIs was effective in all individuals. Overall, Grade 3-4 (P = 0.003) and grade 3-4 drug-related (P = 0.027) adverse events were less frequent in ATV/r arm. A significant increase in total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol was observed as well as a significant improvement in high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, fasting glucose, liver fibrosis and alkaline phosphatase was observed in ATV/r monotherapy in comparison with ATV/r along with two NRTIs.. ATV/r monotherapy treatment simplification showed lower virological efficacy in comparison with maintaining triple therapy; NRTIs reintroduction was effective in all the individuals.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been associated with preterm birth in some studies. We examined risk factors for preterm birth among women randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)- or efavirenz (EFV)-based ART.. This was a planned secondary analysis of the PROMOTE-Pregnant Women and Infants Study, an open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing the risk of placental malaria among HIV-infected, ART-naive pregnant Ugandan women assigned to initiate LPV/r- or EFV-based ART at 12-28 weeks gestation. Gestational age was determined based on last menstrual period and ultrasound biometry. All women received bednets and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Stillbirths, spontaneous abortions, and multiple gestations were excluded from the primary analysis. Potential risk factors for preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation) were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression.. Three hundred fifty-six women were included in this analysis. At enrollment, median gestational age was 21 weeks and median CD4 cell count was 368 cells per cubic millimeter. 14.7% of deliveries in the EFV arm and 16.2% in the LPV/r arm were preterm. Preterm birth was associated with gestational weight gain below 0.1 kg/week versus 0.1 kg/week or more [odds ratio (OR) = 2.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38 to 4.47; P = 0.003]. Neither ART regimen of LPV/r versus EFV (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.63 to 2.00; P = 0.69) nor placental malaria (OR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.44; P = 0.37) was associated with preterm birth.. LPV/r was not associated with an increased risk of preterm birth compared with EFV. However, interventions are needed to address modifiable risk factors for preterm birth, such as nutritional status (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00993031).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lopinavir; Male; Pregnancy; Premature Birth; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Uganda; Young Adult

Faldaprevir is a potent, once-daily hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor. Studies were performed to investigate potential drug interactions between faldaprevir and the commonly used antiretrovirals darunavir/ritonavir, efavirenz, and tenofovir to guide the coadministration of faldaprevir with these agents in human immunodeficiency virus/HCV-coinfected patients.. In 3 open-label, phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, healthy adult volunteers received (1) darunavir/ritonavir (800 mg/100 mg once daily) with and without faldaprevir (240 mg once daily); (2) faldaprevir (240 mg twice daily) with and without efavirenz (600 mg once daily); or (3) faldaprevir (240 mg twice daily) or tenofovir (300 mg once daily) alone and in combination. To assess potential drug interactions, geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for PK parameters were calculated. Safety was evaluated.. Efavirenz decreased faldaprevir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 35%, Cmax by 28%, and Cmin by 46%, consistent with induction of CYP3A by efavirenz. Tenofovir decreased faldaprevir AUC by 22%, which was not considered to be clinically relevant. Faldaprevir had no clinically relevant effects on darunavir or tenofovir PK (15% and 22% AUC increase, respectively). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profiles of faldaprevir and the antiretrovirals being examined.. No clinically significant interactions were observed between faldaprevir and darunavir/ritonavir or tenofovir. A potentially clinically relevant decrease in faldaprevir exposure was observed when coadministered with efavirenz; this decrease can be managed using the higher of the 2 faldaprevir doses tested in phase 3 trials (240 mg once daily as opposed to 120 mg once daily).

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Aminoisobutyric Acids; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Leucine; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Proline; Protease Inhibitors; Quinolines; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Thiazoles; Young Adult

Standard first-line antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection includes two nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NtRTIs), but these drugs have limitations. We assessed the 96 week efficacy and safety of an NtRTI-sparing regimen.. Between August, 2010, and September, 2011, we enrolled treatment-naive adults into this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial in treatment-naive adults in 15 European countries. The composite primary outcome was change to randomised treatment before week 32 because of insufficient virological response, no virological response by week 32, HIV-1 RNA concentration 50 copies per mL or higher at any time after week 32; death from any cause; any new or recurrent AIDS event; or any serious non-AIDS event. Patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral treatment with 400 mg raltegravir twice daily plus 800 mg darunavir and 100 mg ritonavir once daily (NtRTI-sparing regimen) or tenofovir-emtricitabine in a 245 mg and 200 mg fixed-dose combination once daily, plus 800 mg darunavir and 100 mg ritonavir once daily (standard regimen). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01066962.. Of 805 patients enrolled, 401 received the NtRTI-sparing regimen and 404 the standard regimen, with median follow-up of 123 weeks (IQR 112-133). Treatment failure was seen in 77 (19%) in the NtRTI-sparing group and 61 (15%) in the standard group. Kaplan-Meier estimated proportions of treatment failure by week 96 were 17·8% and 13·8%, respectively (difference 4·0%, 95% CI -0·8 to 8·8). The frequency of serious or treatment-modifying adverse events were similar (10·2 vs 8·3 per 100 person-years and 3·9 vs 4·2 per 100 person-years, respectively).. Our NtRTI-sparing regimen was non-inferior to standard treatment and represents a treatment option for patients with CD4 cell counts higher than 200 cells per μL.. European Union Sixth Framework Programme, Inserm-ANRS, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck Laboratories.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Darunavir; Deoxycytidine; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

Concomitant treatment of tuberculosis (TB) and HIV is recommended and improves outcomes. Bedaquiline is a novel drug for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB; combined use with antiretroviral drugs, nevirapine, or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) is anticipated, but no clinical data from coinfected patients are available. Plasma concentrations of bedaquiline and its M2 metabolite after single doses were obtained from interaction studies with nevirapine or LPV/r in healthy volunteers. The antiretrovirals' effects on bedaquiline and M2 pharmacokinetics were assessed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Potential dose adjustments were evaluated with simulations. No significant effects of nevirapine on bedaquiline pharmacokinetics were identified. LPV/r decreased bedaquiline and M2 clearances to 35% (relative standard error [RSE], 9.2%) and 58% (RSE, 8.4%), respectively, of those without comedication. As almost 3-fold (bedaquiline) and 2-fold (M2) increases in exposures during chronic treatment with LPV/r are expected, dose adjustments are suggested for evaluation. Efficacious, safe bedaquiline dosing for MDR-TB patients receiving antiretrovirals is important. Modeling results suggest that bedaquiline can be coadministered with nevirapine without dose adjustments. The predicted elevation of bedaquiline and M2 levels during LPV/r coadministration may be a safety concern, and careful monitoring is recommended. Further data are being collected in coinfected patients to determine whether dose adjustments are needed. (These studies have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration numbers NCT00828529 [study C110] and NCT00910806 [study C117].).

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Coinfection; Diarylquinolines; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis; Young Adult

It is uncertain whether HIV-1 antiretroviral exposure and clinical response varies between males and females or different race/ethnic groups. We describe ritonavir-enhanced atazanavir pharmacokinetics in relation to virological failure, safety and tolerability in treatment-naive individuals to investigate potential differences.. Plasma samples were collected from participants in AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5202 for measurement of antiretroviral concentrations. Individual estimates of apparent oral clearance of atazanavir (L/h) were calculated from a one-compartment model and divided into tertiles as slow (<7), middle (7 to <9; reference group) and fast (≥9). Associations between atazanavir clearance and clinical outcomes were estimated with a hazard ratio (HR) from Cox proportional hazards models. Interactions between atazanavir clearance and sex, race/ethnicity and NRTIs were investigated for each of the outcomes.. Among 786 participants, average atazanavir clearance was slower in females (n = 131) than males (n = 655). Atazanavir clearance was associated with time to virological failure (P = 0.053) and this relationship differed significantly by sex (P = 0.003). Females in the fast atazanavir clearance group had shorter time to virological failure (HR 3.49; 95% CI 1.24-9.84) compared with the middle (reference) atazanavir clearance group. Among males, the slow atazanavir clearance group had a higher risk of virological failure (HR 2.10; 95% CI 1.16-3.77).. Atazanavir clearance differed by sex. Females with fast clearance and males with slow clearance had increased risk of virological failure.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Plasma; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Sex Characteristics; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

In a randomized trial comparing nevirapine (NVP)-based versus lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-infected children [primary endpoint discontinuation of study treatment for any reason or virologic failure by week 24] aged 2 months to 3 years, we assessed whether clinical, virologic, immunologic and safety outcomes varied by prior single-dose NVP exposure (PrNVP) for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission and other covariates.. Efficacy was assessed by time to ART discontinuation or virologic failure, virologic failure/death and death; safety by time to ART discontinuation because of a protocol-defined toxicity and first ≥ grade 3 adverse event; immunology and growth by changes in CD4%, weight/height World Health Organization z-scores from entry to week 48. Cox proportional hazards and linear regression models were used to test whether treatment differences depended on PrNVP exposure and other covariates.. Over a median follow up of 48 (PrNVP) and 72 (no PrNVP) weeks, there was no evidence of differential treatment effects by PrNVP exposure or any other covariates. LPV/r-based ART was superior to NVP-based ART for efficacy and safety outcomes; however, those on NVP had larger improvements in CD4%, weight and height z-scores. Lower pretreatment CD4% and higher HIV-1 RNA levels were associated with reduced efficacy, lower pretreatment CD4% with shorter time to ART discontinuation because of a protocol-defined toxicity, and no PrNVP with shorter time to first grade ≥ 3 adverse event.. Differences between LPV/r and NVP ART in efficacy, safety, immunologic and growth outcomes did not depend on PrNVP exposure, prior breast-feeding, sex, HIV-1 subtype, age, pretreatment CD4%, HIV-1 RNA or World Health Organization disease stage. This finding should be considered when selecting an ART regimen for young children.

Topics: Africa South of the Sahara; Anti-HIV Agents; Child, Preschool; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Incidence; India; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lopinavir; Male; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Fosamprenavir (FPV) is the phosphate ester prodrug of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor amprenavir (APV). A pediatric population pharmacokinetic model for APV was developed and simulation was used to identify dosing regimens for pediatric patients receiving FPV in combination with ritonavir (RTV) which resulted in concentrations similar to those in adults receiving FPV/RTV 700/100 mg BID. Pharmacokinetic data was obtained from HIV infected subjects aged 2 months to 18 years receiving either FPV or FPV/RTV. A two-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination was an appropriate structural model. Significant covariates in the model included RTV coadministration on clearance, fed status on bioavailability for the oral suspension, body weight on clearance and volume terms, black race on clearance, and age on clearance. The following FPV/RTV twice daily dosing regimens in pediatric patients delivered plasma APV exposure similar to adults: 45/7 mg/kg in patients weighing <11 kg, 30/3 mg/kg in patients weighing 11 to <15 kg, 23/3 mg/kg in patients weighing 15 to <20 kg, and 18/3 mg/kg in patients weighting ≥20 kg. Additionally children weighing ≥39 kg can receive the adult regimen.

Topics: Adolescent; Carbamates; Child; Child, Preschool; Computer Simulation; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infant; Male; Models, Biological; Organophosphates; Prodrugs; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

The pharmacokinetics assessment in two clinical studies of sifuvirtide (a novel HIV fusion inhibitor) was first reported in Chinese HIV patients. Nineteen treatment-naive HIV patients were treated with s.c.(subcutaneous injection) sifuvirtide [10 or 20 mg q.d.(quaque die)] for 28 days in study 1, and eight treatment-experienced HIV patients were treated with s.c. sifuvirtide (20 mg q.d.) in combination with HAART drugs (lamivudine, didanosine, and Kaletra) for 168 days in study 2. In study 1, T1/2 was 17.8 ± 3.7 h for 10 mg group and 39.0 ± 3.5 h for 20 mg group; the mean Cmax of last dose was 498 ± 54 ng/mL for 10 mg group and 897 ± 136 ng/mL for 20 mg group. In study 2, T1/2 was 6.71 ± 2.17 h in treatment-experienced patients. Cmax was 765 ± 288 ng/mL after last 168th dosage. Sifuvirtide showed improved clinical pharmacokinetics characteristics compared with Enfuvirtide, and showed very different pharmacokinetic characteristics between treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 103:4038-4047, 2014.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Didanosine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Enfuvirtide; Female; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Peptides; Ritonavir

Twice-daily darunavir/ritonavir is indicated in treatment-experienced children (≥3 years). This study assessed once-daily administration in treatment-naïve adolescents.. Phase 2, 48-week, open-label, single-arm study evaluating pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg in treatment-naïve, HIV-1-infected adolescents (≥12 to <18 years, ≥40 kg) with zidovudine/lamivudine or abacavir/lamivudine.. Twelve patients (67% female; median 14.4 years) were enrolled. After 24 and 48 weeks, respectively, 11 of 12 (92%) and 10 of 12 (83%) patients achieved viral load <50 copies/mL (intent-to-treat time-to-loss of virologic response); all had ≥1 log10 drop in viral load versus baseline. Median CD4 cell count increased by 175 and 221 cells/mm (intent-to-treat-noncompleter = failure) after 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. Eighty-three percent of patients were adherent to darunavir/ritonavir. One patient was never suppressed and 1 patient rebounded. No patients developed darunavir resistance-associated mutations or lost phenotypic susceptibility to any commercially available protease inhibitor or any background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Eleven patients (92%) reported ≥1 adverse event (AE), considered in 2 patients to be at least possibly related to darunavir (gastrointestinal-related events and dizziness). Four patients had ≥1 serious AE. Three patients reported ≥1 grade 3/4 AE; no serious or grade 3/4 AEs were considered darunavir related. No patients discontinued because of AEs.. Over 48 weeks, once-daily darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg plus NRTIs was effective and well-tolerated for treatment of HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral-naïve adolescents (≥12 to <18 years). These findings support use of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg in this population.

Topics: Adolescent; Anemia; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Medication Adherence; Nausea; Neutropenia; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Viral Load; Vomiting; Zidovudine

To determine whether nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) contribute to an accelerated loss in telomere length (TL) in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART).. Substudy of randomised controlled trial.. Patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL on combination ART (n = 256) were randomised to darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg once daily, either as monotherapy (n = 127) or with 2 NRTIs (n = 129) for up to 144 weeks. TL and telomerase activity was quantified on stored peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC; n = 124) using quantitative real time PCR.. Patients in the sub-study had a mean age of 44 years and had received NRTI for a mean of 6.4 years (range 1-20 years). As expected, older patients have significantly shorter TL (p = 0.006), while women had significantly longer TL (p = 0.026). There was no significant association between TL and either the duration of prior NRTI treatment (p = 0.894) or the use of a PI versus NNRTI (p = 0.107). There was no significant difference between patients who continued or ceased NRTI in the mean change/year of TL or telomerase (p = 0.580 and 0.280 respectively).. Continuation versus cessation of NRTI treatment was not associated with an accelerated loss in TL or telomerase activity.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Male; Middle Aged; Nucleosides; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Telomerase; Telomere

This study compared the cost-efficacy ratios of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (LPV/r-MT) and of standard of care in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients. The results of the efficacy and safety analyses are presented. We conducted a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial of HIV-infected adults on stable treatment, with HIV- RNA <50 copies/mL, randomised to continue the ongoing regimen (cART-arm) or to switch to LPV/r (400/100 mg BID) MT (MT-arm). Time to virological rebound (VR = confirmed HIV-RNA ?50 copies/mL) was estimated by Ka- plan-Meier method and changes in laboratory values during follow-up were evaluated by univariate mixed-linear models. Ninety-four patients were randomised and analysed (43 in the MT-arm and 51 in the cART-arm). Five (four in the MT and 1 in the cART-arm; p=0.175) had VR, but time to VR did not statistically differ between the two arms (p=0.143). Major PI mutations were not detected at VR. Patients on MT had significant increases in total choles- terol [difference in mean change between MT and cART arm: 0.77 (±0.30) mg/dL per month; p=0.012] and eGFR [difference in mean change between MT and cART arm: 0.24 (±0.11) mL/min/1.73 m2 per month; p=0.029]. LPV/r-MT seems safe in most patients and should be considered in patients who have developed kidney toxicity from tenofovir.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Viral Load

To evaluate the efficacy of boosted darunavir and atazanavir used in antiretroviral therapy (ARVT) regimens for treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients with low baseline immune parameters and a high viral load.. The investigators evaluated the clinical, immunological, and virological efficiency of treatment: the time course of changes in CD4+ lymphocyte levels and viral load at the beginning and at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 weeks of antiviral therapy, as well as adverse reactions.. The virological effect of once daily darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg was highly competitive with that of atazanavir/ritonavir: at 96 weeks of treatment, HIV RNA <120 copies/ml was achieved in 95% of the patients in both treatment groups. A combination of once daily darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg ensured a more marked immunological improvement: a difference in the increment (77.1 in 1 μl) of CD4+ lymphocyte count in patients who took darunavir (362.2 in μl) and in those who used atazanavir (285.1 in μl). In the patients who received darunavir, diarrhea, nausea, and headache were observed at the same frequency as in those who had atazanavir.. The use of the test agents used in the ARVT has shown their efficacy and good tolerability.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Viral Load

Rifampicin profoundly reduces lopinavir concentrations. Doubled doses of lopinavir/ritonavir compensate for the effect of rifampicin in adults, but fail to provide adequate lopinavir concentrations in young children on rifampicin-based antituberculosis therapy. The objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model describing the pharmacokinetic differences of lopinavir and ritonavir, with and without rifampicin, between children and adults.. An integrated population pharmacokinetic model developed in nonmem 7 was used to describe the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir in 21 HIV infected adults, 39 HIV infected children and 35 HIV infected children with tuberculosis, who were established on lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy with and without rifampicin-containing antituberculosis therapy.. The bioavailability of lopinavir was reduced by 25% in adults whereas children on antituberculosis treatment experienced a 59% reduction, an effect that was moderated by the dose of ritonavir. Conversely, rifampicin increased oral clearance of both lopinavir and ritonavir to a lesser extent in children than in adults. Rifampicin therapy in administered doses increased CL of lopinavir by 58% in adults and 48% in children, and CL of ritonavir by 34% and 22% for adults and children, respectively. In children, the absorption half-life of lopinavir and the mean transit time of ritonavir were lengthened, compared with those in adults.. The model characterized important differences between adults and children in the effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir. As adult studies cannot reliably predict their magnitude in children, drug-drug interactions should be evaluated in paediatric patient populations.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Biological Availability; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Drug Interactions; Female; Half-Life; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Nonlinear Dynamics; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

To evaluate safety and durability of once-daily and twice-daily darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)-based treatment in HIV patients in clinical practice.. The Surveillance Cohort Long-Term Toxicity Antiretrovirals (SCOLTA) project is a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort created to assess the incidence of adverse events in patients receiving new antiretroviral drugs. Twenty-five Italian infectious diseases centers enroll patients and collect their data through this on-line system. Periodical evaluations of these patients, including physical examination and laboratory tests, were performed at baseline and every 6 months.. Four hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled since May 2006. Eighty-five patients (19.8%) were prescribed once-daily DRV/r; 31 of them were treatment-naïve (36.5%). Among 54 (63.5%) treatment-experienced patients, 21 (38.9%) had undetectable viral load and started once-daily DRV/r as a simplification regimen. Patients on twice-daily regimen were older, more frequently lipodystrophic, HCV-coinfected, and in CDC stage C. In the following 24 months of follow-up, the viral load steadily decreased as well as the CD4 cell count rose. The reason for discontinuation did not significantly differ between groups. Mean blood glucose (BG) change from baseline did not show significant difference between groups, as well as high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TGL) and alanine transaminase (ALT). The survival curve shows that patients in the once-daily regimen withdrew treatment more frequently than those on twice-daily regimen (Log Rank Chi(2)P=0.009).. Our study showed that DRV/r administrated both once daily or twice daily was safe and well tolerated with few discontinuations due to adverse events.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Cohort Studies; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Internet; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Survival Analysis; Time Factors; Viral Load

A previous study investigating coadministration of etravirine, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and lopinavir/ritonavir soft-gel formulation resulted in nonclinically relevant changes in etravirine and lopinavir exposure. The current study evaluated the pharmacokinetic interaction between etravirine and the lopinavir/ritonavir melt extrusion formulation.. Sixteen human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative volunteers were randomized to either treatment sequence A/B or B/A, with 14 days- washout between treatments (treatment A: etravirine 200 mg bid for 8 days; treatment B: lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg bid for 16 days with etravirine 200 mg bid on days 9-16). Steady-state pharmacokinetics were assessed for all antiretrovirals alone and coadministered; pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by noncompartmental analysis. Safety and tolerability were assessed.. Coadministration of etravirine and lopinavir/ritonavir resulted in a 35% decrease in etravirine exposure. Smaller decreases (<13%) were observed in lopinavir and ritonavir exposure. Six volunteers reported headache; 1 grade 3 triglyceride increase was reported.. Lopinavir/ritonavir induced etravirine metabolism to a similar extent as most other boosted HIV protease inhibitors. The short-term coadministration of etravirine and lopinavir/ritonavir was well tolerated and did not lead to increased incidences of adverse events.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gels; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; Young Adult

In the ARTEMIS trial, 689 treatment-naïve, HIV-1-infected adults received darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg every day or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 800/200 mg total daily dose plus fixed-dose tenofovir/emtricitabine. Week 96 metabolic parameters are reported. Adverse events (AEs) classed as metabolism/nutrition disorders were observed in 14% of DRV/r and 22% of LPV/r patients. Lipid-related AEs were reported in fewer DRV/r (8%) than LPV/r (16%) patients. A small increase in glucose and insulin levels was observed at week 96 in both groups. Lipoma was the only lipodystrophy-related AE reported in >1% of patients (DRV/r, n = 1; LPV/r, n = 4) and no grade 3 or 4 lipodystrophy-related AEs were reported. No clinically relevant changes from baseline were seen in anthropometric measurements in either group. Median mid-waist/hip ratio at week 96 was comparable to baseline in both arms. Over 96 weeks, DRV/r had a similar effect on glucose and insulin levels but a more favourable lipid profile than LPV/r in treatment-naïve, HIV-infected patients.

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Etravirine is a substrate and inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and a substrate and inhibitor of CYP2C9 and CYPC2C19. Darunavir/ritonavir is a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A. Artemether and lumefantrine are primarily metabolized by CYP3A; artemether is also metabolized to a lesser extent by CYP2B6, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Artemether has an active metabolite, dihydroartemisinin. The objective was to investigate pharmacokinetic interactions between darunavir/ritonavir or etravirine and arthemether/lumefrantrine.. This single-centre, randomized, two-way, two-period cross-over study included 33 healthy volunteers. In panel 1, 17 healthy volunteers received two treatments (A and B) in random order, with a washout period of 4 weeks between treatments: treatment A: artemether/lumefantrine 80/480 mg alone, in a 3-day course; treatment B: etravirine 200 mg twice a day (bid) for 21 days with artemether/lumefantrine 80/480 mg from day 8 (a 3-day treatment course). In panel 2, another 16 healthy volunteers received two treatments, similar to those in panel 1 but instead of etravirine, darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid was given.. Overall, 28 of the 33 volunteers completed the study. Co-administration of etravirine reduced the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of artemether [by 38%; 90% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.80], dihydroartemisinin (by 15%; 90% CI 0.75-0.97) and lumefantrine (by 13%; 90% CI 0.77-0.98) at steady state. Co-administration of darunavir/ritonavir reduced the AUC of artemether (by 16%; 90% CI 0.69-1.02) and dihydroartemisinin (by 18%; 90% CI 0.74-0.91) but increased lumefantrine (2.75-fold; 90% CI 2.46-3.08) at steady state. Co-administration of artemether/lumefantrine had no effect on etravirine, darunavir or ritonavir AUC. No drug-related serious adverse events were reported during the study.. Co-administration of etravirine with artemether/lumefantrine may lower the antimalarial activity of artemether and should therefore be used with caution. Darunavir/ritonavir can be co-administered with artemether/lumefantrine without dose adjustment but should be used with caution.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antimalarials; Artemether; Artemisinins; Cross-Over Studies; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Ethanolamines; Fluorenes; Healthy Volunteers; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Lumefantrine; Malaria; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

To investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-protease inhibitor atazanavir (ATV) in the presence and absence of the pharmacokinetic booster ritonavir, utilizing ATV plasma trough concentrations (Ctrough ) and clinical biomarkers of antiviral efficacy and safety over 48 weeks.. Randomized, open-label, multicenter, study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of ATV 300 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg (ATV300/r) with that of ATV 400 mg (ATV400).. Thirty clinic sites across 10 countries in Africa, Europe, North America, and South America.. Patients who were HIV-positive and treatment-naïve.. Randomized to once-daily ATV400 (105 patients) or ATV300/r (95 patients) plus lamivudine and extended-release stavudine.. The Ctrough approximately 24 hours after the prior unobserved dose was measured through week 48. Composite Ctrough (i.e., the geometric mean of all trough concentrations over the 48 weeks), population inhibitory quotient ([IQ], i.e., Ctrough divided population estimated protein binding adjusted effective concentration at 90% [EC90 , 14 ng/ml]), composite population IQ (i.e., ATV composite trough divided by population estimated protein binding adjusted EC90 ), HIV RNA, CD4 cell counts, and metabolic and safety parameters were also assessed. For ATV400 and ATV300/r, respectively, geometric mean composite Ctrough (CV%) were 127 (106) ng/ml and 670 (63) ng/ml, geometric mean composite population IQ were 9 and 48, and composite Ctrough values of HIV EC90 or more were achieved in 98% and 100% of patients. High ATV Ctrough was associated with low HIV RNA at week 48; however, 88% of patients had HIV RNA less than 400 copies/ml in the lowest composite Ctrough quartile. There was no clear relationship between ATV Ctrough and changes in CD4 cell count. Increases in total bilirubin or jaundice were associated with higher Ctrough . Modest increases in triglycerides and cholesterol were associated with the addition of ritonavir.. ATV-containing regimens with or without ritonavir achieved ATV exposures that provide robust antiretroviral efficacy and acceptable tolerability in treatment-naïve patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

The adherence profile of HIV-infected patients predicts the therapeutic outcome, in particular during the early phase of antiretroviral therapy (ART). We conducted a prospective observational multicenter trial monitoring adherence and virological and immunological parameters over the initial 6 months of treatment. Thirty-five subjects were starting a treatment regimen including atazanavir, ritonavir, and emtricitabine-tenofovir. Adherence was assessed using self-completed questionnaires, announced pill counts, and the medication event monitoring system (MEMS) for each drug. Three MEMS measures were defined: the percentages of doses taken, days with the correct dosing, and doses taken on time (± 3 h). Dynamic virological suppression (DVS) was defined as a reduction in the plasma HIV-RNA level of >1 log10 per month or <40 copies/ml. The cumulative treatment time was 5,526 days. A high level of adherence was observed. The MEMS-defined adherence for correct dosing (-0.68% per 4-week period, P < 0.03) and timing compliance (-1.60% per 4-week period, P < 0.003) decreased significantly over time. The MEMS-defined adherence data were concordant with the pill counts during the trial but not with the data from the questionnaires. The median [range] percentages of doses taken (100% [50 to 102]), days with the correct dosing (95% [41 to 100]), and doses taken on time (86% [32 to 100]) were significantly associated with DVS in separate models. Among these three measures, the percentage of doses taken on time had the greatest ability to predict DVS. Timing compliance should be supported to optimize DVS during the early phase of treatment by once-daily boosted protease inhibitor-based ART. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00528060.).

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Deoxycytidine; Drug Administration Schedule; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tenofovir; Viral Load

ODIN (once-daily darunavir in treatment-experienced patients) was a 48-week, phase III, randomized, open-label trial comparing once-daily (qd) darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg with twice-daily (bid) DRV/r 600/100 mg, both with an optimized background regimen [OBR; at least two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)], in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected adults with no DRV resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) at screening. Week 48 analyses of virological response by subgroups are reported.. A total of 590 patients were randomized to receive qd (n=294) or bid (n=296) DRV/r. Virological response (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) was assessed according to: screening HIV-1 RNA (≥ or <50000 copies/mL), CD4 cell count, prior protease inhibitor (PI) use, number of active NRTIs in the OBR, presence of mutations (primary PI mutations, PI RAMs or M184V/I), gender, age, race, HIV-1 clade and adherence.. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms and across subgroups. Response rates were comparable between qd and bid DRV/r treatments for all subgroups examined. Response rates were 78.4 and 76.8% in the qd and bid treatment arms, respectively, in patients with baseline HIV-1 RNA ≤ 50000 copies/mL and 52.8% in both arms in those with > 50000 copies/mL. Response rates for the qd and bid treatment arms by baseline CD4 cell count were also similar (69.6 vs. 65.2% for <200 cells/μL; 72.2 vs. 74.8% for 200- <350 cells/μL; 77.0 vs. 74.3% for ≥ 350 cells/μL).. DRV/r administered either qd or bid provided effective treatment for antiretroviral treatment-experienced patients with no DRV RAMs, with comparable response rates across all subgroups studied. Low patient numbers in specific subgroups may limit interpretation of these specific subgroup results.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Patient Compliance; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load; Young Adult

Darunavir is a potent protease inhibitor of HIV. To enhance its pharmacokinetic profile, darunavir must be co-administered with ritonavir. There is wide inter-patient variability in darunavir pharmacokinetics among HIV-infected individuals, however. Darunavir is a known substrate for influx transporters, such as the 1A2 and the 1B1 members of the solute carrier organic anion transporter family (SLCO1A2, SLCO1B1), as well as for efflux transporters such as the multi-drug resistance protein 1 (MRP1).. The aim of this study was to develop a semi-mechanistic population pharmacokinetic model for darunavir and ritonavir administered in HIV-infected adults. The desired model would incorporate patient characteristics and pharmacogenetic data contributing to variability in drug concentrations and also take into account the interaction between the two compounds.. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with 705 plasma samples from 75 Caucasian individuals receiving darunavir/ritonavir (600/100 mg twice daily) for at least 4 weeks. At least one full pharmacokinetic profile was obtained for each participant, and darunavir and ritonavir concentrations in plasma were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Genotyping for 148 polymorphisms in genes coding for transporters or metabolizing enzymes was conducted by two methods: MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and real-time polymerase chain reaction-based allelic discrimination. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed for darunavir and for ritonavir. The effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms on the post hoc individual pharmacokinetic parameters was first explored using graphic methods and regression analysis. Those covariates related to changes in darunavir or ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters were then further evaluated using non-linear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM version VII).. Darunavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics were best described by a two- and one-compartment model, respectively, both with first-order absorption and elimination. The darunavir peripheral volume of distribution decreased as α1-acid glycoprotein concentrations increased. Darunavir clearance was 12 % lower in patients with SLCO3A1 rs8027174 GT/TT genotypes, while homozygosity for the rs4294800 A allele was associated with 2.5-fold higher central volume of distribution. Body weight influenced ritonavir clearance. Ritonavir inhibited darunavir clearance following a maximum-effect model.. A population pharmacokinetic model to simultaneously describe the pharmacokinetics of darunavir and ritonavir was developed in HIV-infected patients. The model provides better understanding of the interaction between darunavir and ritonavir and suggests an association between SLCO3A1 polymorphisms and darunavir pharmacokinetics. Bayesian estimates of individual darunavir parameters and ritonavir may be useful to predict darunavir exposure.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Organic Anion Transporters; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

 Cobicistat (COBI) is a pharmacoenhancer with no antiretroviral activity in vitro..  An international, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of COBI versus ritonavir (RTV) as a pharmacoenhancer of atazanavir (ATV) in combination with emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in treatment-naive patients. The primary end point was a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA load of <50 copies/mL at week 48 by the Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm; the noninferiority margin was 12%..  A total of 692 patients were randomly assigned to a treatment arm and received study drug (344 in the COBI group vs 348 in the RTV group). At week 48, virologic success was achieved in 85% of COBI recipients and 87% of RTV recipients (difference, -2.2% [95% confidence interval, -7.4% to 3.0%]); among patients with a baseline HIV-1 RNA load of >100 000 copies/mL, rates were similar (86% vs 86%). Similar percentages of patients in both groups had serious adverse events (10% of COBI recipients vs 7% of RTV recipients) and adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment with the study drug (7% vs 7%). Median increases in the serum creatinine level were 0.13 and 0.09 mg/dL, respectively, for COBI and RTV recipients..  COBI was noninferior to RTV in combination with ATV plus FTC/TDF at week 48. Both regimens achieved high rates of virologic success. Safety and tolerability profiles of the 2 regimens were comparable. Once-daily COBI is a safe and effective pharmacoenhancer of the protease inhibitor ATV.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Cobicistat; Deoxycytidine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

To identify an alternative inhaled corticosteroid to fluticasone propionate that can be safely coadministered with HIV protease inhibitors, the safety and pharmacokinetics of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and its active metabolite, beclomethasone 17-monopropionate (17-BMP), in combination with ritonavir (RTV) and darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) were assessed.. Open-label, prospective, randomized pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study in healthy volunteers.. Thirty healthy volunteers received inhaled 160 μg bid BDP for 14 days and were then randomized (1:1:1) into 3 groups: group 1 (control) remained on BDP alone for 28 days, group 2 received 100 mg bid BDP + RTV for 28 days, and group 3 received 600/100 mg bid BDP + DRV/r for 28 days. Pharmacokinetic sampling for 17-BMP was performed on days 14 and 28, and pharmacokinetic parameter values were compared within patients and between groups. Cortisol stimulation testing was also performed on days 1, 14, 28, and 42 and compared within and between groups.. Geometric mean ratios (day 28:day 14) (90% confidence interval) for 17-BMP area under the concentration-time curve in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, were 0.93 (0.81 to 1.06, P = 0.27), 2.08 (1.52 to 2.65, P = 0.006), and 0.89 (0.68 to 1.09, P = 0.61). There were no significant reductions in serum cortisol levels within or between groups (P > 0.05).. DRV/r did not increase 17-BMP exposure, whereas RTV alone produced a statistically significant but clinically inconsequential 2-fold increase in 17-BMP exposure. Adrenal suppression was not observed in any of the study groups. These data suggest that BDP can be safely coadministered with DRV/r and likely other RTV-boosted protease inhibitors.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Beclomethasone; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

To compare the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) and tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) in treatment-naïve Japanese patients with HIV-1 infection.. A 96-week multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel group pilot study was conducted. The endpoints were times to virologic failure, safety event and regimen modification.. 109 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated (54 patients received ABC/3TC and 55 patients received TDF/FTC). All randomized subjects were analyzed. The time to virologic failure was not significantly different between the two arms by 96 weeks (HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 0.72-6.13; p=0.178). Both regimens showed favorable viral efficacy, as in the intention-to-treat population, 72.2% (ABC/3TC) and 78.2% (TDF/FTC) of the patients had an HIV-1 viral load <50 copies/mL at 96 weeks. The time to the first grade 3 or 4 adverse event and the time to the first regimen modification were not significantly different between the two arms (adverse event: HR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.25-1.75, p=0.407) (regimen modification: HR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.33-3.19, p=0.964). Both regimens were also well-tolerated, as only 11.1% (ABC/3TC) and 10.9% (TDF/FTC) of the patients discontinued the allocated regimen by 96 weeks. Clinically suspected abacavir-associated hypersensitivity reactions occurred in only one (1.9%) patient in the ABC/3TC arm.. Although insufficiently powered to show non-inferiority of viral efficacy of ABC/3TC relative to TDF/FTC, this pilot trial suggested that ABC/3TC with ATV/r is a safe and efficacious initial regimen for HLA-B*5701-negative patients, such as the Japanese population.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiviral Agents; Asian People; Atazanavir Sulfate; Deoxycytidine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pilot Projects; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this analysis was to characterize viral resistance in the Phase III, randomized ODIN trial, which demonstrated non-inferiority of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg to DRV/r 600/100 mg twice daily, each combined with an optimized background regimen in treatment-experienced patients with no DRV resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) at screening.. Virological failure (VF) was defined as never achieving or losing confirmed virological suppression after week 12, with patients being classed as 'never suppressed' (never achieved HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/ml) or 'rebounders' (achieved two consecutive HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/ml but then ≥ 50 copies/ml). Phenotypes and genotypes of plasma HIV-1 viruses, using population-based sequencing and Antivirogram(®), were determined at screening/baseline and on samples from VFs with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/ml.. Mean baseline HIV-1 RNA was 4.16 log10 copies/ml and 53.9% of patients were protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced at enrolment. VF rate was similar in both arms. A similar proportion of virologically failing patients in both arms developed PI RAMs (11.7% versus 9.5%, respectively) or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor RAMs (6.7% versus 7.1%). One patient with VF (once-daily arm) developed four primary PI mutations, three of which were also DRV RAMs. This patient was also the only VF to lose susceptibility to DRV. Loss of susceptibility to other PIs (once daily 3.4%; twice daily 0%) and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (once daily 13.6%; twice daily 9.8%) in VF patients was infrequent and comparable between treatment arms.. These analyses showed once-daily DRV/r 800/100 mg was associated with similar rates of VF and emergence of resistance as DRV/r 600/100 mg twice daily in treatment-experienced patients with no DRV RAMs.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

African potato (Hypoxis obtusa) is commonly used in Sub-Saharan Africa as a complementary herbal remedy for HIV-infected patients. It is unknown whether or not co-administration of African potato alters the pharmacokinetics of protease inhibitor antiretrovirals. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the African potato on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r).. Sixteen adult volunteers were administered LPV/r 400/100 mg twice a day for 14 days, followed by concomitant administration with African potato given once daily for 7 days. Lopinavir plasma exposure as estimated by the area under the concentration-time curve over the 12-h dosing interval (AUC(0-12h), AUCτ) was determined on day 14 and again on day 21. Lopinavir in plasma was analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Steady-state AUCτ and the maximum concentration following dose administration (C(max)) were determined using non-compartmental methods using WinNonlin Professional version 5.2.1. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 12.1.. Co-administration of African potato was not associated with any change in lopinavir AUCτ, C(max), or C(trough).. African potato when taken concomitantly with LPV/r is well-tolerated and not associated with clinically significant changes in lopinavir pharmacokinetics.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucosides; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Plant Extracts; Ritonavir; Solanum tuberosum; Young Adult

Atazanavir (ATV) causes an elevation of unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia (HBR) as a result of UDP glucuronyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 inhibition. Zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) reduces unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in individuals with Gilbert's syndrome. We assessed the changes in total, conjugated, and unconjugated bilirubin and the effect on ATV pharmacokinetics (PK) after single and 14-day dosing of ZnSO(4). HIV patients, stable on ATV/ritonavir (ATV/r)-containing regimens with a total bilirubin level of >25 mmol/liter received 125 mg daily of ZnSO(4) as Solvazinc tablets for 14 days. ATV/r and bilirubin concentrations were measured pre-ATV/r dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h post-ATV/r dose; before ZnSO4 initiation (phase 1), after a single dose (phase 2) and after 14 days (phase 3). Changes in bilirubin and ATV/r concentrations in the absence or presence of ZnSO4 were evaluated by geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs; we used phase 1 as a reference). Sixteen male patients completed the study maintaining virologic suppression; ZnSO(4) was well tolerated. Statistically significant declines in total bilirubin C(max) and AUC(0-24) of 16 and 17% were seen in phase2 and 20% in phase 3. Although there were no significant changes in conjugated bilirubin, unconjugated bilirubin Cmax and AUC(0-24) of were lower (17 and 19%, phase 2; 20 and 23% during phase 3). The ATV GMRs (90% CI) for C(trough), C(max), and AUC(0-24) were 0.74 (0.62 to 0.89), 0.82 (0.70 to 0.97), and 0.78 (0.70 to 0.88). Intake of ZnSO(4) decreases total and unconjugated bilirubin and causes modest declines in ATV exposure. ZnSO(4) supplementation may be useful in management of ATV-related HBR in selected patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Atazanavir Sulfate; Bilirubin; Confidence Intervals; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Tolerance; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Young Adult; Zinc Sulfate

Rates of cardiovascular disease are higher among HIV-infected patients as a result of the complex interplay between traditional risk factors, HIV-related inflammatory and immunologic changes, and effects of antiretroviral therapy (ART). This study prospectively evaluated changes in cardiovascular biomarkers in an underrepresented, racially diverse, HIV-1-infected population receiving abacavir/lamivudine as backbone therapy.. This 96-week, open-label, randomized, multicenter study compared once-daily fosamprenavir/ritonavir 1400/100 mg and efavirenz 600 mg, both with ABC/3TC 600 mg/300 mg, in antiretroviral-naïve, HLA-B*5701-negative adults without major resistance mutations to study drugs. We evaluated changes from baseline to weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, and 96 in interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), soluble vascular adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), d-dimer, plasminogen, and fibrinogen. Biomarker data were log-transformed before analysis, and changes from baseline were described using geometric mean ratios.. This study enrolled 101 patients (51 receiving fosamprenavir/ritonavir; 50 receiving efavirenz): 32% female, 60% African American, and 38% Hispanic/Latino; 66% (67/101) completed 96 weeks on study. At week 96, levels of IL-6, sVCAM-1, d-dimer, fibrinogen, and plasminogen were lower than baseline in both treatment groups, and the decrease was statistically significant for sVCAM-1 (fosamprenavir/ritonavir and efavirenz), d-dimer (fosamprenavir/ritonavir and efavirenz), fibrinogen (efavirenz), and plasminogen (efavirenz). Values of hs-CRP varied over time in both groups, with a significant increase over baseline at Weeks 4 and 24 in the efavirenz group. At week 96, there was no difference between the groups in the percentage of patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (fosamprenavir/ritonavir 63%; efavirenz 66%) by ITT missing-equals-failure analysis. Treatment-related grade 2-4 adverse events were more common with efavirenz (32%) compared with fosamprenavir/ritonavir (20%), and median lipid concentrations increased in both groups over 96 weeks of treatment.. In this study of underrepresented patients, treatment with abacavir/lamivudine combined with either fosamprenavir/ritonavir or efavirenz over 96 weeks, produced stable or declining biomarker levels except for hs-CRP, including significant and favorable decreases in thrombotic activity (reflected by d-dimer) and endothelial activation (reflected by sVCAM-1). Our study adds to the emerging data that some cardiovascular biomarkers are decreased with initiation of ART and control of HIV viremia.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00727597.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Fibrinogen; Furans; HIV Infections; Humans; Interleukin-6; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Plasminogen; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1; Young Adult

 Prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is usually based on zidovudine-containing regimens, despite potential toxicities. This multicenter trial evaluated whether lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy in HIV type 1-infected women not requiring antiretrovirals for themselves could control maternal viral load (VL)..  Overall, 105 pregnant women with baseline VL <30 000 copies/mL and CD4 ≥350 cells/µL were randomized to start open-label LPV/r 400/100 mg twice daily alone (monotherapy group, n = 69) or combined with zidovudine/lamivudine 300/150 mg twice daily (triple therapy group, n = 36) from 26 gestational weeks to delivery. According to a Fleming 2-stage phase 2 design, monotherapy was considered to be efficacious if at least 59 patients achieved VL <200 copies/mL at 8 weeks of treatment (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints were VL at delivery and tolerance..  Monotherapy was efficacious as defined: 62 women in the monotherapy group achieved VL <200 copies/mL at 34 weeks' gestation (ie, 8 weeks of treatment; 89.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 80.2%-95.8%). At delivery, proportions with VL <200 copies/mL were similar in the monotherapy and triple therapy groups (92.8% vs 97.2%; P = .66); however, fewer had VL <50 copies/mL in the monotherapy group (78.3% vs 97.2%; P = .01). Changes for intolerance were less frequent in the monotherapy than in the triple therapy group (1.4% vs 11.1%, respectively; P = .046). Cesarean delivery and preterm delivery rates did not differ. All children were liveborn; 1 case of HIV-1 transmission occurred in the triple therapy group, none in the monotherapy group (95% CI upper limit = 5.2%)..  LPV/r monotherapy achieved satisfactory virologic efficacy in women treated solely for PMTCT, providing proof of concept for future nucleoside-sparing strategies.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lopinavir; Male; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Ritonavir

Uncertainty exists about the best treatment for people with HIV-1 who have virological failure with first-line combination antiretroviral therapy of a non-nucleoside analogue (NNRTI) plus two nucleoside or nucleotide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NtRTI). We compared a second-line regimen combining two new classes of drug with a WHO-recommended regimen.. We did this 96-week, phase 3b/4, randomised, open-label non-inferiority trial at 37 sites worldwide. Adults with HIV-1 who had confirmed virological failure (plasma viral load >500 copies per mL) after 24 weeks or more of first-line treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus two or three NtRTIs (control group) or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus raltegravir (raltegravir group). The randomisation sequence was computer generated with block randomisation (block size four). Neither participants nor investigators were masked to allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with plasma viral load less than 200 copies per mL at 48 weeks in the modified intention-to-treat population, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00931463.. We enrolled 558 patients, of whom 541 (271 in the control group, 270 in the raltegravir group) were included in the primary analysis. At 48 weeks, 219 (81%) patients in the control group compared with 223 (83%) in the raltegravir group met the primary endpoint (difference 1·8%, 95% CI -4·7 to 8·3), fulfilling the criterion for non-inferiority. 993 adverse events occurred in 271 participants in the control group versus 895 in 270 participants in the raltegravir group, the most common being gastrointestinal.. The raltegravir regimen was no less efficacious than the standard of care and was safe and well tolerated. This simple NtRTI-free treatment strategy might extend the successful public health approach to management of HIV by providing simple, easy to administer, effective, safe, and tolerable second-line combination antiretroviral therapy.. University of New South Wales, Merck, AbbVie, the Foundation for AIDS Research.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Nucleosides; Nucleotides; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

A theoretical concern exists that atazanavir (ATV) use during pregnancy may exacerbate physiologic neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. The aim of this substudy was to evaluate patterns of neonatal bilirubin following ATV/ritonavir (RTV) treatment of pregnant mothers and clinical and pharmacogenetic factors that may correlate. The design involved a subanalysis of study AI424182, a multicenter, open-label, prospective, single-arm Phase I study. The study had two treatment arms: (1) ATV/RTV 300/100 mg once daily or (2) ATV/RTV 400/100 mg once daily, both in combination with zidovudine/lamivudine 300/150 mg twice daily. Total bilirubin was assessed at baseline, each visit, and delivery day for mothers and on days 1 (delivery day), 3, 5, and 7 and weeks 2 and 6 for neonates. Blood samples were obtained for UGT1A1 genotyping and ATV cord blood concentration. Bilirubin elevation of any grade occurred in 14/40 neonates (35%). All Grade 3 to 4 bilirubin abnormalities (n=7) occurred after day 14. The pattern of neonatal bilirubin levels reported was consistent with neonatal physiologic elevations of bilirubin. Little correlation was observed between either maternal bilirubin levels over the last 4 weeks of pregnancy (including delivery) or ATV cord concentration and neonatal bilirubin. There was a significant association between UGT1A1 genotype and bilirubin grade in the maternal population (p=0.0006) but not neonates (p=0.49). Neither neonatal UGT1A1 genotype nor cord blood ATV concentration is a good predictor of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. ATV/RTV treatment of mothers does not appear to exacerbate neonatal physiologic hyperbilirubinemia.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Bilirubin; Female; Glucuronosyltransferase; HIV Infections; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Infant, Newborn; Oligopeptides; Plasma; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Ritonavir

The goal of this study was to define viral kinetics after initiation of raltegravir (RAL)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART).. ART-naive patients received RAL, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and emtricitabine for 72 weeks. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA were measured by ultrasensitive and single-copy assays, and first (d1)-, second (d2)-, and, third (d3)-phase decay rates were estimated by mixed-effects models. Decay data were compared to historical estimates for efavirenz (EFV)- and ritonavir/lopinavir (LPV/r)-based regimens.. Bi- and tri-exponential models for ultrasensitive assay (n = 38) and single-copy assay (n = 8) data, respectively, provided the best fits over 8 and 72 weeks. The median d1 with ultrasensitive data was 0.563/day (interquartile range [IQR], 0.501-0.610/day), significantly slower than d1 for EFV-based regimens [P < .001]). The median duration of d1 was 15.1 days, transitioning to d2 at an HIV-1 RNA of 91 copies/mL, indicating a longer duration of d1 and a d2 transition at lower viremia levels than with EFV. Median patient-specific decay estimates with the single-copy assay were 0.607/day (IQR, 0.582-0.653) for d1, 0.070/day (IQR, 0.042-0.079) for d2, and 0.0016/day (IQR, 0.0005-0.0022) for d3; the median d1 duration was 16.1 days, transitioning to d2 at 69 copies/mL. d3 transition occurred at 110 days, at 2.6 copies/mL, similar to values for LPV/r-based regimens.. Models using single-copy assay data revealed 3 phases of decay with RAL-containing ART, with a longer duration of first-phase decay consistent with RAL-mediated blockade of productive infection from preintegration complexes.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA Stability; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Viral Load

: This 96-week, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 study, randomized subjects to elvitegravir once daily or raltegravir twice daily with a fully active, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor plus a third agent. The proportion of subjects randomized to elvitegravir that achieved and maintained HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL through week 96 was 47.6% (167/351) compared with 45.0% (158/351) for raltegravir with a treatment difference of 2.6% (95% confidence interval: 4.6% to 9.9%). Both regimens were well tolerated, with comparable rates of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities through week 96. Once-daily elvitegravir was noninferior to twice-daily raltegravir, showed durable long-term efficacy, and was well tolerated in HIV+ treatment-experienced patients.

Topics: Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Pyrrolidinones; Quinolones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) regimen on renal function in Chinese HIV-infected patients.. Seventy-five HIV-1 infected patients failing first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) comprised the TDF+PI/r group. Seventy-five HIV-1 infected patients matched for gender, age, and renal function made up the control. All subjects completed follow-up visits over 48 weeks. CD4 cell count, plasma HIV-1 viral load, and urine protein level were assessed at the trial start (baseline, week 0) and at week 48. The serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were monitored at each follow-up point. Change in eGFR from baseline to week 48 was also compared.. Compared to control, the TDF+PI/r group exhibited higher levels of serum creatinine (79 vs. 69.7 μmol/L, P<0.001) and a lower rate of eGFR (93.0 vs. 101.6 ml/min/1.73 m², P=0.009) at the end of week 48. Patients treated with TDF+PI/r showed greater decline in eGFR than control (-8.8 vs. 6.4 ml/min/1.73 m², P<0.001). Compared to baseline renal function of the control group, the TDF+PI/r group exhibited a greater median decline in eGFR at the end of week 48 (P<0.001).. We found that a TDF+PI/r based ART regimen resulted in greater renal function decline over 48 weeks. Therefore, renal function should be monitored especially when TDF is used in combination with PI/r.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00872417.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Creatinine; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; HIV Infections; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Prospective Studies; Protease Inhibitors; Proteinuria; Ritonavir; Statistics, Nonparametric; Tenofovir

To compare changes over 48 weeks in bone mineral density (BMD) between participants randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) + raltegravir (RAL) or LPV/r + 2-3 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N(t)RTIs) as second line therapy.. 48-week open-label sub-study of the Second Line trial conducted in South Africa, India, Thailand, Malaysia and Argentina.. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans of proximal femur and lumbar spine were performed at baseline and week 48. Linear regression was used to compare means of differences between arms. McNemars test compared osteopenia and osteoporosis. Associations between percentage BMD changes and baseline variables were assessed by multivariate linear regression.. Two hundred and ten participants were randomized. Analyses were adjusted for sex, BMI and smoking status. Mean (95% CI) proximal femur BMD% reduced over 48 weeks by -5.2% (-6.7 to -3.8%) in the LPV/r+2-3N(t)RTIs arm and by -2.9% (-4.3 to -1.5%) in the LPV/r+RAL arm (P = 0.0001). Lumbar spine BMD reduced by -4.2% (-5.7 to -2.7%) in the LPV/r+2-3N(t)RTIs arm and by -2.0% (-3.5 to -0.6%) in the LPV/r+RAL arm (P = 0.0006). The incidence of osteopenia (7.6%) and osteoporosis (2.0%) assessed over 48 weeks were similar between arms. Reduced BMD over 48 weeks was significantly associated with longer duration of tenofovir on study [% change (SE) -1.58 (0.38) femur, -1.65 (0.38) spine, P = 0.0001] and low baseline BMI [% change (SE) 0.5 (0.13) femur, 0.17 (0.07) spine; P < 0.01].. An N(t)RTI-sparing antiretroviral regimen of LPV/r and raltegravir as second line therapy is associated with less bone loss than a LPV/r regimen containing N(t)RTIs.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Argentina; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Female; Femur; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; India; Lopinavir; Lumbar Vertebrae; Malaysia; Male; Osteoporosis; Prevalence; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; South Africa; Thailand; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Benzoxazines; Breast Feeding; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cohort Studies; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Eruptions; Drug Substitution; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lopinavir; Nevirapine; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Protease Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Uganda; World Health Organization

Based on drug-drug interaction, dose reduction of rifabutin is recommended when co-administered with HIV protease inhibitors for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated mycobacterial infection. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of rifabutin administered at 300 mg/day alone to that at 150 mg every other day combined with lopinavir-ritonavir in Japanese patients with HIV/mycobacterium co-infection.. Plasma concentrations of rifabutin and its biologically active metabolite, 25-O-desacetyl rifabutin were measured in 16 cases with HIV-mycobacterial coinfection. Nine were treated with 300 mg/day rifabutin and 7 with 150 mg rifabutin every other day combined with lopinavir-ritonavir antiretroviral therapy (ART). Samples were collected at a median of 15 days (range, 5-63) of rifabutin use.. The mean Cmax and AUC0-24 of rifabutin in patients on rifabutin 150 mg every other day were 36% and 26% lower than on 300 mg/day rifabutin, while the mean Cmax and AUC0-24 of 25-O-desacetyl rifabutin were 186% and 152% higher, respectively. The plasma concentrations of rifabutin plus its metabolite were similar between the groups within the first 24 hours, but it remained low during subsequent 24 to 48 hours under rifabutin 150 mg alternate day dosing.. Rifabutin dose of 150 mg every other day combined with lopinavir-ritonavir seems to be associated with lower exposure to rifabutin and its metabolite compared with rifabutin 300 mg/day alone in Japanese patients. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal rifabutin dose during ART. The results highlight the importance of monitoring rifabutin plasma concentration during ART.. UMIN-CTR (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=search&action=input&language=E) UMIN000001102.

Topics: Adult; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Young Adult

Approximately one-third of all HIV-infected individuals are coinfected with HCV, many of whom will receive concomitant treatment for both infections. With the advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for HCV, potential drug interactions between antiretrovirals and DAAs require evaluation prior to co-therapy.. Three open-label studies were conducted in healthy subjects to assess potential interactions between the investigational first-in-class HCV NS5A replication complex inhibitor daclatasvir and representative antiretrovirals atazanavir/ritonavir, efavirenz and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.. Target exposure was that of 60 mg daclatasvir alone. Dose-normalized (60 mg) geometric mean ratios of daclatasvir AUCτ for 20 mg ± atazanavir/ritonavir (2.10 [90% CI 1.95, 2.26]) and 120 mg ± efavirenz (0.68 [0.60, 0.78]) showed less than the three-fold elevation and two-fold reduction, respectively, in systemic exposure predicted by prior interaction studies with potent inhibitors/inducers of CYP3A4. Daclatasvir dose adjustment to 30 mg once daily with atazanavir/ritonavir and 90 mg once daily with efavirenz is predicted to normalize AUCτ relative to the target exposure (geometric mean ratios 1.05 [0.98, 1.13] and 1.03 [0.90, 1.16], respectively). Atazanavir exposure (Cmax, AUCτ and C24 trough) and efavirenz Ctrough under coadministration were similar to historical data without daclatasvir. No clinically relevant interactions between daclatasvir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate were observed for either drug, and no dosing adjustments were indicated. Daclatasvir was well tolerated in all three studies.. The pharmacokinetic data support coadministration of daclatasvir with atazanavir/ritonavir, efavirenz and/or tenofovir. A Phase III study in HIV-HCV coinfection has commenced using the described dose modifications.

Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Pyrrolidines; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Valine; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Young Adult

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

As efforts intensify to eliminate perinatal HIV transmission, understanding kinetics of maternal-to-child transfer of antiretrovirals during pregnancy and breastfeeding is critical. Antiretroviral levels in plasma, cord blood, and breastmilk reflect exposure over short intervals. Hair concentrations reflect cumulative exposure and can uniquely quantify in utero transfer of maternal medications to infants. We measured plasma and hair antiretroviral levels in HIV-infected Ugandan mothers and their infants at delivery and during breastfeeding to assess transfer.. HIV-infected pregnant women were randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir- or efavirenz-based therapy in a larger trial (the Prevention of Malaria and HIV disease in Tororo, PROMOTE). At 0, 8, and 12 weeks postpartum, plasma antiretroviral levels were measured in 117 mother-infant pairs; hair levels were assayed at 12 weeks. Ratios and correlations of infant:maternal concentrations were calculated.. By 12 weeks, 90.4% of mothers reported exclusive breastfeeding. Hair and plasma levels over time suggest moderate (47%) to extensive (87%) in utero transfer of lopinavir and ritonavir, respectively, but negligible transfer of either via breastfeeding. Moderate transfer of efavirenz occurs during pregnancy and breastfeeding (40% cumulative; 15% during breastfeeding). Despite differences in exposure, no infant seroconversions or correlations between infant hair/plasma antiretroviral levels and adverse effects were observed.. Using a unique approach combining hair and plasma data, we found that different antiretrovirals have distinct kinetics of mother-to-infant transfer. Efavirenz transfers during both pregnancy and breastfeeding, whereas lopinavir and ritonavir transfer only in utero. Further study of the degree and timing of maternal-to-child transfer by antiretroviral will help optimize strategies that protect infants and minimize toxicities during periods of risk.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Female; Hair; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Lopinavir; Milk, Human; Plasma; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Ritonavir; Uganda

HIV mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) is significantly reduced if antepartum viral load (apVL) is<50 copies/mL. Pharmacokinetic studies suggest increasing the dosage of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in pregnancy. It is important to assess tolerance, safety, and rate of patients presenting a apVL<50 copies/mL when treating with increased dose of LPV/r during pregnancy. Confirmed HIV-infected pregnant women with a fetus at a gestational age of 14-33 weeks were randomly assigned to receive LPV/r 400/100 or 600/150 mg b.i.d. plus two nucleoside analogues (NRTIs). Treatment was discontinued in the case of alanine transaminase (ALT) of grade III elevation or higher, glucose, or triglycerides. Thirty-two women were randomized to the LPV/r 400/100 mg dose, and 31 women were randomized to the 600/150 mg dose. Overall, 9.4% of the women receiving the conventional dose, and 17.2% receiving the increased dose, discontinued treatment because of adverse events (p=0.29). The rates of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, laboratory abnormalities, preterm delivery, and low birth weight were similar in both groups. There were no cases of HIV MTCT. Among the women with a baseline VL>50 copies/mL assigned to the conventional dose group, 45% (95% confidence interval [CI] 62.5-27.5%) had a apVL>50 copies/mL compared with 10.5% (95% CI 21.6-0.6%) of those assigned to the increased dose group (p=0.01). There was no significant difference found for the patients with a baseline VL<50 copies/mL. In pregnant women with a baseline VL>50 copies/mL, it may be warranted to initiate LPV/r dosing at 600/150 mg, whereas the conventional dose is sufficient for pregnant women with a baseline VL<50 copies/mL.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lopinavir; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Trimesters; Prenatal Care; Protease Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

To compare changes over 48 weeks in body fat, lipids, Metabolic Syndrome and cardiovascular disease risk between patients randomised 1:1 to lopinavir/ritonavir (r/LPV) plus raltegravir (RAL) compared to r/LPV plus 2-3 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N(t)RTIs) as second-line therapy.. Participants were HIV-1 positive (>16 years) failing first-line treatment (2 consecutive HIV RNA >500 copies/mL) of NNRTI +2N(t)RTI. Whole body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry was performed at baseline and week 48. Data were obtained to calculate the Metabolic Syndrome and Framingham cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score. Linear regression was used to compare mean differences between arms. Logistic regression compared incidence of metabolic syndrome. Associations between percent limb fat changes at 48 weeks with baseline variables were assessed by backward stepwise multivariate linear regression. Analyses were adjusted for gender, body mass index and smoking status.. 210 participants were randomised. The mean (95% CI) increase in limb fat over 48 weeks was 15.7% (5.3, 25.9) or 0.9 kg (0.2, 1.5) in the r/LPV+N(t)RTI arm and 21.1% (11.1, 31,1) or 1.3 kg (0.7, 1.9) in the r/LPV+RAL arm, with no significant difference between treatment arms (-5.4% [-0.4 kg], p>0.1). Increases in total body fat mass (kg) and trunk fat mass (kg) were also similar between groups. Total:HDL cholesterol ratio was significantly higher in the RAL arm (mean difference -0.4 (1.4); p = 0.03), there were no other differences in lipid parameters between treatment arms. There were no statistically significant differences in CVD risk or incidence of Metabolic Syndrome between the two treatment arms. The baseline predictors of increased limb fat were high viral load, high insulin and participant's not taking lipid lowering treatment.. In patients switching to second line therapy, r/LPV combined with RAL demonstrated similar improvements in limb fat as an N(t)RTI + r/LPV regimen, but a worse total:HDL cholesterol ratio over 48 weeks.. This clinical trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov, registry number NCT00931463 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ ct2/show/NCT00931463?term = NCT00931463&rank = 1.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Body Fat Distribution; Body Mass Index; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lipodystrophy; Logistic Models; Lopinavir; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load; Virus Replication

The objective of this study was to evaluate the switch to once-daily darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg in treatment-experienced patients with suppressed HIV-1 replication on a twice-daily ritonavir-boosted protease-inhibitor (bid PI/r) containing regimen, that is in a setting where genotypic resistance test cannot be performed. In this open label, non-comparative, multicenter study, patients on a bid PI/r-containing triple combination, with suppressed viral replication, were switched to once-daily darunavir/r 800/100 mg containing triple combination. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml 24 weeks after the switch. Intensive darunavir pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed at Week 4 (W4) in 11 patients. Eighty-five patients were enrolled. All had HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml at screening with a pre-exposure to a median of 2 PI/r (1-5). By intent-to-treat analysis (missing = failure), 78/85 patients (92%, 95% CI [83;96]) maintained an HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml at W24. Seven patients experienced protocol-defined treatment failure between baseline and W24: Two had confirmed low-level viral rebound, one discontinued study treatment for adverse event, three withdrew their consent, and one was lost to follow-up. By on-treatment analysis, 78/80 patients (97%, 95% CI [91;99]) maintained an HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml at W24. Results were similar at Week 48. The median area under the darunavir plasma concentration-time curve measured in 11 patients was 61,380 ng hr/ml; darunavir median trough concentration 1,340 ng/ml and darunavir half-life was 12.2 hr. Tolerability of once-daily darunavir/r 800/100 mg was excellent. Optimally suppressed, treatment-experienced patients can switch safely from a twice-daily PI/r regimen to a once-daily darunavir/r 800/100 mg containing regimen.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

To determine changes of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of patients on monotherapy with lopinavir/ritonavir.. The Monotherapy Switzerland/Thailand study (MOST) trial compared monotherapy with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir with continued therapy. The trial was prematurely stopped due to virological failure in six patients on monotherapy. It, thus, offers a unique opportunity to assess brain markers in the early stage of HIV virological escape.. : Sixty-five CSF samples (34 on continued therapy and 31 on monotherapy) from 49 HIV-positive patients enrolled in MOST. Using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, we determined the CSF concentration of S100B (astrocytosis), neopterin (inflammation), total Tau (tTau), phosphorylated Tau (pTau), and amyloid-β 1-42 (Aβ), the latter three indicating neuronal damage. Controls were CSF samples of 29 HIV-negative patients with Alzheimer dementia.. In the CSF of monotherapy, concentrations of S100B and neopterin were significantly higher than in continued therapy (P = 0.006 and P = 0.013, respectively) and Alzheimer dementia patients (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0005, respectively). In Alzheimer dementia, concentration of Aβ was lower than in monotherapy (P = 0.005) and continued therapy (P = 0.016) and concentrations of tTau were higher than in monotherapy (P = 0.019) and continued therapy (P = 0.001). There was no difference in pTau among the three groups. After removal of the 16 CSF with detectable viral load in the blood and/or CSF, only S100B remained significantly higher in monotherapy than in the two other groups.. Despite full viral load-suppression in blood and CSF, antiretroviral monotherapy with lopinavir/ritonavir can raise CSF levels of S100B, suggesting astrocytic damage.

Topics: Amyloid beta-Peptides; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Astrocytes; Biomarkers; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Neopterin; Peptide Fragments; Ritonavir; S100 Proteins; Switzerland; tau Proteins; Thailand

Propensity for developing coronary heart disease (CHD) is linked with Framingham-defined cardiovascular risk factors and elevated inflammatory biomarkers. Cardiovascular risk and inflammatory biomarkers were evaluated in ARIES, a Phase IIIb/IV clinical trial in which 515 antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected subjects initially received abacavir/lamivudine + atazanavir/ritonavir for 36 weeks. Subjects who were virologically suppressed by week 30 were randomized 1:1 at week 36 to either maintain or discontinue ritonavir for an additional 108 weeks. Framingham 10-year CHD risk scores (FRS) and risk category of <6% or ≥6%, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were assessed at baseline, week 84, and week 144. Biomarkers were stratified by FRS category. When ritonavir-boosted/nonboosted treatment groups were combined, median hsCRP did not change significantly between baseline (1.6 mg/liter) and week 144 (1.4 mg/liter) in subjects with FRS <6% (p=0.535) or with FRS ≥6% (1.9 mg/liter vs. 2.0 mg/liter, respectively; p=0.102). Median IL-6 was similar for subjects with FRS <6% (p=0.267) at baseline (1.6 pg/ml) and week 144 (1.4 pg/ml) and for FRS ≥6% (2.0 pg/ml vs. 2.2 pg/ml, respectively; p=0.099). Median Lp-PLA(2) decreased significantly (p<0.001) between baseline (197 nmol/min/ml) and week 144 (168 nmol/min/ml) in subjects with FRS <6% and with FRS ≥6% (238 nmol/min/ml vs. 175 nmol/min/ml, respectively; p<0.001). In conclusion, in antiretroviral-naive subjects treated with abacavir-based therapy for 144 weeks, median inflammatory biomarker levels for hsCRP and IL-6 generally remained stable with no significant difference between baseline and week 144 for subjects with either FRS <6% or FRS ≥6%. Lp-PLA(2) median values declined significantly over 144 weeks for subjects in either FRS stratum.

Topics: 1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine Esterase; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Coronary Disease; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Inflammation; Interleukin-6; Lamivudine; Lipids; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Risk Assessment; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Raltegravir has been demonstrated to have a favourable impact on several metabolic parameters, including a lack of changes in lipid and glucose concentrations. We aimed to assess the effect on endothelial function of switching from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r)-based regimen to raltegravir.. This is a substudy of the SPIRAL study, a multicentre, randomized, open-label clinical trial including HIV-infected patients on a stable PI/r-based antiretroviral regimen and virologically suppressed for at least the previous 6 months. Endothelial function was prospectively evaluated through flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery at baseline and at weeks 24 and 48.. Thirty-five HIV-infected patients were included. Sixteen patients were randomly assigned to continue their current PI/r regimen and 19 to switch the PI/r to raltegravir. Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides decreased at weeks 16 and 32 in the raltegravir-switch arm, while no changes were observed in the PI/r arm. Triglyceride levels were significantly lower in the raltegravir arm than in the PI/r arm at weeks 16, 32 and 48. No significant changes from baseline occurred in FMD at weeks 24 and 48 within or between the raltegravir and PI/r arms. Adjustment for baseline artery diameter did not have a significant effect on the FMD differences.. Switching from a PI/r-based antiretroviral regimen to raltegravir in patients with virological suppression has a beneficial impact on the lipid profile, but it does not seem to have a clear impact on endothelial function after a 1 year follow-up.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Endothelial Cells; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir

This paper presents the final analysis of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) vs. lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected adults.. ARTEMIS (AntiRetroviral Therapy with TMC114 ExaMined In naïve Subjects; NCT00258557) was a randomized, open-label, phase-III, 192-week trial. Patients were stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA and CD4 count, and randomized to once-daily DRV/r 800/100 mg or LPV/r 800/200 mg total daily dose (either once or twice daily) plus tenofovir/emtricitabine.. Of 689 randomized patients receiving treatment (DRV/r: 343; LPV/r: 346), 85 and 114 patients in the DRV/r and LPV/r arms, respectively, had discontinued by week 192. Noninferiority was shown in the primary endpoint of virological response (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) [DRV/r: 68.8%; LPV/r: 57.2%; P < 0.001; intent to treat (ITT)/time to loss of virological response; estimated difference in response 11.6% (95% confidence interval 4.4-18.8%)]. Statistical superiority in virological response of DRV/r over LPV/r was demonstrated for the primary endpoint (P = 0.002) and for the ITT non-virological-failure-censored analysis (87.4% vs. 80.8%, respectively; P = 0.040). No protease inhibitor (PI) primary mutations developed and only low levels of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance developed in virological failures in both groups. Significantly fewer discontinuations because of adverse events were observed with DRV/r (4.7%) than with LPV/r (12.7%; P = 0.005). Grade 2-4 treatment-related diarrhoea was significantly less frequent with DRV/r than with LPV/r (5.0% vs. 11.3%, respectively; P = 0.003). DRV/r was associated with smaller median increases in total cholesterol and triglyceride levels than LPV/r. Changes in low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were similar between groups. Similar increases in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase for DRV/r and LPV/r were observed.. Over 192 weeks, once-daily DRV/r was noninferior and statistically superior in virological response to LPV/r, with a more favourable gastrointestinal profile, demonstrating its suitability for long-term use in treatment-naïve patients.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Protease Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

The UGT1A1*28 variant has been associated with hyperbilirubinemia and atazanavir discontinuation. Protocol A5202 randomly assigned human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients to receive atazanavir/ritonavir (atazanavir/r) or efavirenz, with tenofovir/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine. A total of 646 atazanavir/r recipients were evaluable for UGT1A1. Homozygosity for *28/*28 was present in 8% of whites, 24% of blacks, and 18% of Hispanics and was associated with increased bilirubin concentrations. There was an association between *28/*28 and increased atazanavir/r discontinuation among Hispanic participants (P = .005) but not among white or black participants (P = .79 and P = .46, respectively). The positive predictive value of 28*/28* for atazanavir/r discontinuation among Hispanic participants was only 32% (95% confidence interval, 16%-52%).

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Bilirubin; Genetic Variation; Genotype; Glucuronosyltransferase; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Jaundice; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir

Abstract The influence of efavirenz, etravirine, raltegravir, and nevirapine administration on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted darunavir was investigated using population pharmacokinetics analysis. The population was composed of 142 patients infected with HIV: darunavir plus nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), 54 patients (group A); darunavir plus efavirenz±NRTI, 4 patients (group B); darunavir plus etravirine±NRTI, 5 patients (group C); darunavir plus nevirapine±NRTI, 21 patients (group D); darunavir plus raltegravir±NRTI, 38 patients (group E); and darunavir plus raltegravir and etravirine±NRTI, 20 patients (group F). A significant increase in darunavir clearance in combination with nevirapine (+66%) and efavirenz (+235%) was observed. A significant decrease (p<0.05) in trough plasma concentration was observed in groups B and D compared with the other groups. Our study indicates that the combination of ritonavir-boosted darunavir and etravirine or raltegravir has no significant influence on the pharmacokinetics of darunavir in contrast to the combination of ritonavir-boosted darunavir and nevirapine or efavirenz, which involves an increase in darunavir clearance and a decrease in the plasma concentration of darunavir.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Drug Synergism; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Nevirapine; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

We studied whether addition of enfuvirtide (ENF) to a background combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) would improve the CD4 cell count response at week 24 in naive patients with advanced HIV disease. ANRS 130 Apollo is a randomized study, conducted in naive HIV-1-infected patients, either asymptomatic with CD4 counts of <100/mm(3) or stage B/C disease with CD4 counts of <200/mm(3). Patients received tenofovir-emtricitabine with lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) or efavirenz and were randomized to receive ENF for 24 weeks (ENF arm) or not (control arm). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with CD4 counts of ≥ 200/mm(3) at week 24. A total of 195 patients were randomized: 73% had stage C disease, 78% were male, the mean age was 44 years, the median CD4 count was 30/mm(3), and the median HIV-1 RNA load was 5.4 log(10) copies/ml. Eighty-one percent of patients received LPV/r. One patient was lost to follow-up, and eight discontinued the study (four in each arm). The proportions of patients with CD4 counts of ≥ 200/mm(3) at week 24 were 34% and 38% in the ENF and control arms, respectively (P = 0.53). The proportions of patients with HIV-1 RNA loads of <50 copies/ml were 74% and 58% at week 24 in the ENF and control arms, respectively (P < 0.02), and the proportion reached 79% in both arms at week 48. Twenty (20%) and 12 patients (13%) in the ENF and control arms, respectively, experienced at least one AIDS event during follow-up (P = 0.17). Although inducing a more rapid virological response, addition of ENF to a standard cART does not improve the immunological outcome in naive HIV-infected patients with severe immunosuppression.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cyclopropanes; Deoxycytidine; Drug Combinations; Emtricitabine; Enfuvirtide; Female; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Immune Tolerance; Lopinavir; Male; Organophosphonates; Peptide Fragments; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

This study was performed to evaluate a once-daily dual-therapy regimen, maraviroc (MVC) + atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r), in treatment-naive patients.. A phase 2b, randomized, open-label pilot study.. In Study A4001078 (NCT00827112), treatment-naive patients with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 (HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies/mL; CD4 cell count ≥100 cells/mm) were randomized to receive either MVC 150 mg once daily (n = 60) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) 300/200 mg once daily (n = 61) + ATV/r 300/100 mg once daily. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter at week 48.. At week 48, 44 (74.6%) and 51 (83.6%) patients in the MVC and TDF/FTC treatment groups, respectively, had plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter. Median change from baseline in CD4 cell count at week 48 was +173 and +187 cells per cubic millimeter with MVC and TDF/FTC, respectively. Seven patients discontinued from each arm; there were no deaths. The incidence of serious adverse events (AEs) was similar in each group; however, there were more grade 3/4 AEs in the MVC group (18 vs 11), mostly due to hyperbilirubinemia. Three patients in each arm were evaluable for virological analysis at discontinuation or failure (HIV-1 RNA >500 copies/mL); no genotypic resistance, change in tropism, or loss of susceptibility relevant to treatment was observed.. The virological activity and immunological benefit of once-daily MVC + ATV/r were confirmed. Indirect hyperbilirubinemia and associated signs were the most commonly reported AEs in both study treatment groups and were not associated with significant transaminase increases. No drug resistance occurred.

Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclohexanes; Deoxycytidine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Maraviroc; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pilot Projects; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Triazoles; Viral Load; Young Adult

The effect of nonthymidine nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) on fat mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content and function is unclear.. A5202 randomized antiretroviral therapy-naive human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects to abacavir-lamivudine (ABC/3TC) versus tenofovir DF-emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) with efavirenz (EFV) or atazanavir-ritonavir (ATV/r). A5224s, substudy of A5202, enrolled 269 subjects with fat measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography. A subset of subjects underwent fat biopsies at baseline and week 96 for mtDNA content (real-time polymerase chain reaction) and oxidative phosphorylation nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (reduced) dehydrogenase (complex I) and cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV) activity levels (immunoassays). Intent-to-treat analyses were performed using analysis of variance and paired t tests.. Fifty-six subjects (87% male; median age, 39 years) were included; their median body mass index, CD4 cell count, and fat mtDNA level were 26 kg/m(2), 227 cells/μL, and 1197 copies/cell, respectively. Fat mtDNA content decreased within the ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC groups (combining EFV and ATV/r arms; median change, -341 [interquartile range, -848 to 190; P = .03] and -400 [-661 to -221; P < .001] copies/cell, respectively), but these changes did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P = .57). Complex I and IV activity decreased significantly in the TDF/FTC group (median change, -12.45 [interquartile range, -24.70 to 2.90; P = .003] and -8.25 [-13.90 to -1.30; P < .001], optical density × 10(3)/µg, respectively) but not the ABC/3TC group. Differences between the ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC groups were significant for complex I (P = .03).. ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC significantly and similarly decreased fat mtDNA content, but only TDF/FTC decreased complex I and complex IV activity levels.. NCT00118898.

Topics: Adenine; Adipose Tissue; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Deoxycytidine; Dideoxynucleosides; DNA, Mitochondrial; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Mitochondria; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

Few studies have assessed metabolic and body composition alterations in perinatally HIV-infected African children on antiretroviral therapy (ART). We compared metabolic profiles and regional fat of children on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (lopinavir/ritonavir), lamivudine and stavudine to those switched to nevirapine, lamivudine and stavudine.. This study evaluated metabolic and body composition outcomes in 156 HIV-infected children completing a randomised trial that assessed the continued use of lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART or switch to nevirapine-based ART in Johannesburg, South Africa (2005-2010). Fasting total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides total and regional body fat (BF) were measured. A clinical assessment for lipodystrophy (LD) was conducted.. 156 children (mean age 5.1±0.8 years, mean duration of treatment 4.2±0.7 years, mean time since randomisation 3.4±0.7 years) were enrolled. 85 were randomised to the lopinavir/ritonavir group and 71 to the nevirapine group. The lopinavir/ritonavir group had lower mean HDL (1.3±0.4 vs 1.5±0.4 mmol/l, p<0.001) and higher mean TC (4.4±1.0 vs 4.1±0.8 mmol/l, p=0.097), LDL (2.6±0.9 vs 2.3±0.7 mmol/l, p=0.018) and triglycerides (1.1±0.4 vs 0.8±0.3 mmol/l, p<0.001). The lopinavir/ritonavir group had more total BF by mean skinfold sum (43±11.1 vs 39±10.1 mm, p=0.031) and BF% by bioelectrical impedance analysis (17.0±7.0 vs 14.1±8.0%, p=0.022). Thirteen (8.4%) met criteria for LD.. Unfavourable alterations in lipid profile and triglycerides, and differences in fat are detectable in young HIV-infected South African children receiving lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens versus those switched to nevirapine-based regimens. Interventions to mitigate these alterations are warranted to reduce long-term cardiovascular disease risk.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Body Composition; Child; Child, Preschool; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Infant; Insulin Resistance; Lamivudine; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; South Africa; Stavudine

Steady-state pharmacokinetics in pregnant women prescribed ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir (FPV) to prevent HIV transmission were assessed in the second trimester, third trimester, and postpartum. Compared with postpartum, geometric mean amprenavir (APV, FPVs active metabolite) area under the plasma concentration-time curves were 35% lower in the second trimester and 25% lower in the third trimester. Maternal APV concentrations were 9- to 15-fold above the mean APV protein-adjusted 50% inhibitory concentration for wild-type HIV. Median ratio of cord blood/maternal APV levels was 0.27, and all infants were HIV negative. FPV/ritonavir during pregnancy was well tolerated and led to virologic suppression.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Carbamates; Disease Transmission, Infectious; Female; Fetal Blood; Furans; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Organophosphates; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

This ongoing, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase 3 international trial demonstrated the noninferior efficacy of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF) compared with atazanavir boosted by ritonavir (ATV/RTV) plus emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) at 48 weeks. Here, we report the week 96 results. Of 708 treated subjects, virological success (Food and Drug Administration snapshot) was maintained at week 96 with EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF and ATV/RTV + FTC/TDF (83% vs 82%, difference 1.1%, 95% confidence interval -4.5% to 6.7%). Study drug discontinuations due to adverse events were low (4% vs 6%). Median increases from baseline in serum Cr (mg/dL) in EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF vs ATV/RTV + FTC/TDF at week 96 (0.12 vs 0.08) were similar to those at week 48 (0.12 vs 0.08). EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF showed similar mean decreases (%) in bone mineral density from baseline vs ATV/RTV + FTC/TDF (hip: -3.16 vs -4.19, P = 0.069; spine: -1.96 vs -3.54, P = 0.049). Overall, week 96 results support durable efficacy and safety of EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF in HIV-1-infected patients.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alanine Transaminase; Anti-HIV Agents; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Atazanavir Sulfate; Bilirubin; Bone Density; Carbamates; Cobicistat; Confidence Intervals; Creatinine; Deoxycytidine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Quinolones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Thiazoles; Triglycerides

Discontinuation of thymidine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tNRTIs) is the only proven strategy for improving lipoatrophy. It is unclear whether switching to NRTI-sparing or to non-thymidine NRTI-containing therapy has differential effects on body fat recovery.. This was a 96 week, open-label, randomized study in suppressed patients with moderate/severe lipoatrophy and no prior virological failure while receiving a protease inhibitor and who had their triple NRTI regimen (zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir) switched to lopinavir/ritonavir plus abacavir/lamivudine for a 1 month run-in period and then randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir plus abacavir/lamivudine versus lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy. The KRETA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00865007).. Of 95 patients included, 88 were randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir plus abacavir/lamivudine (n = 44) or lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (n = 44). Median (IQR) baseline limb fat was 2.5 (1.6-3.7) kg in the lopinavir/ritonavir plus abacavir/lamivudine group and 2.5 (2.0-5.4) kg in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group. Six patients in the triple therapy group and 13 in the monotherapy group had discontinued study drugs by week 96. Although there were limb fat gains in each group at weeks 48/96 (+324/+358 g in lopinavir/ritonavir plus abacavir/lamivudine, P = 0.09/0.07, versus +215/+416 g in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group, P = 0.28/0.16), differences between groups were not significant [difference +109 g (95% CI -442, +660)/-57 g (95% CI -740, +625)].. In lipoatrophic patients treated with zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir, switching to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy had no additional benefit in limb fat recovery relative to switching to lopinavir/ritonavir with abacavir/lamivudine. These data suggest that non-thymidine nucleosides such as abacavir/lamivudine are not an obstacle to limb fat recovery.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adipose Tissue; Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atrophy; Body Composition; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Dideoxynucleosides; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Lamivudine; Lipids; Lipodystrophy; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Failure

The potential drug-to-drug interaction between darunavir and raltegravir in the setting of HIV infection is a highly debated issue still unresolved. In the present study we have evaluated the pharmacokinetics of darunavir and ritonavir in 53 HIV-1 infected patients with or without concomitant raltegravir administration. The assessment of trough plasma drug concentrations was carried out in all subjects and the potential influence of raltegravir on darunavir and ritonavir disposition, assessed by specific pharmacokinetic evaluations in a subgroup of 25 patients. No significant differences on darunavir and ritonavir plasma trough levels were observed between patients receiving or not raltegravir. Co-administration of raltegravir was, however, associated with a 40% reduction in darunavir C(max) and estimated AUC(0-24), as well a 60% increase in the estimated darunavir clearance compared with values measured in patients not given raltegravir. Notably, this interaction was independent of the dosage of darunavir and not due to effects of raltegravir on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir. These results should be taken into account when darunavir-based regimens are implemented in the setting of HIV, especially considering that this drug is usually administered at fixed daily dose and no therapeutic drug monitoring is performed in most centres.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation based on creatinine or cystatine C may be more accurate methods especially in patients without chronic kidney disease. There is lack of data on GFR estimated by these methods in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy.. Antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients were randomized to tenofovir/emtricitabine in association with atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) or efavirenz (EFV) Patients had to have an actual creatinine clearance >50 mL/minute (24-hour urine collection) and were followed for 48 weeks.. Ninety-one patients (48 ATV/r, 43 EFV) were recruited. Using the CKD-EPI creatinine formula, there was a significant decrease in GFR up to week 48 in patients receiving ATV/r (4.9 mL/minute/m(2), P = 0.02) compared with a not statistically significant increment in patients prescribed EFV. Using the cystatin C-based equation, we found greater decrease in GFR in both arms, although, in the EFV arm, the decrease was not statistically significant (5.8 mL/minute/m(2), P = 0.92). At multivariable analysis, ATV/r was a significant predictor of greater decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (P = 0.0046) only with CKD-EPI creatinine.. ATV/r plus tenofovir caused greater GFR decreases compared with EFV. The evaluation of eGFR by cystatin C confirmed this result, but this method seemed to be more stringent, probably precluding the possibility to detect a significant difference in the pattern of eGFR evolution between the two arms over time. More studies are needed to understand the clinical relevance of these alterations and whether cystatin C is a more appropriate method for monitoring GFR in clinical practice.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Creatinine; Cyclopropanes; Cystatin C; Deoxycytidine; Emtricitabine; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pilot Projects; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

Elvitegravir is a once daily inhibitor of HIV-1 integrase boosted by ritonavir. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of elvitegravir with raltegravir, another HIV-1 integrase inhibitor, in patients in whom previous antiretroviral treatment failed.. We conducted a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 study at 234 sites in 13 countries. Eligible patients had plasma HIV RNA of 1000 copies per mL or greater, any CD4 cell count, and resistance to or 6 months' experience with at least two classes of antiretroviral drugs. They received an open-label background regimen of a fully active, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor and a second agent. We randomly allocated patients (1:1) by computer with a block size of four to receive either elvitegravir 150 mg once daily (n=361; 85 mg dose if given with atazanavir, or lopinavir with ritonavir) or raltegravir 400 mg twice daily (n=363). Placebo tablets were given to mask the difference in daily dosing. The primary endpoint was achievement and maintenance of virological response (HIV RNA <50 copies per mL) through week 48. Non-inferiority was prespecified with a margin of 10%. We did a modified intention-to-treat analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00708162.. Ten patients allocated elvitegravir and 12 assigned raltegravir were excluded from the analysis (either for protocol violations or because they did not receive treatment). 207 (59%) of 351 patients allocated elvitegravir achieved virological response compared with 203 (58%) of 351 assigned raltegravir (treatment difference 1·1%, 95% CI -6·0 to 8·2), meeting the criterion for non-inferiority (p=0·001). Three patients allocated elvitegravir had serious adverse events related to study drugs compared with seven assigned raltegravir; two and eight patients died, respectively. More individuals assigned elvitegravir reported diarrhoea up to week 48 (p=0·023), and more patients assigned raltegravir had grade 3 or 4 rises in alanine aminotransferase (p=0·020) or aspartate aminotransferase (p=0·009).. Elvitegravir used in combination with a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in treatment-experienced patients has similar efficacy and safety to raltegravir. Since elvitegravir can be given once a day compared with twice a day for raltegravir, elvitegravir might improve patients' adherence.. Gilead Sciences.

Topics: Adult; Alanine Transaminase; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrrolidinones; Quinolones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

We assessed pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of reduced dose lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and compared generic and branded tablets. Twenty HIV-infected patients using protease inhibitors with HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter were randomized to generic or branded LPV/r 200/50mg twice daily (BID). At week 2, PK-sampling was performed. Patients crossed over to the other arm until week 12, with another PK-sampling at week 4. Subtherapeutic lopinavir concentrations were observed in 10/40 samples. PK parameters were comparable between branded and generic tablets. All patients remained virologically suppressed at week 12. In conclusion, LPV/r 200/50mg BID does not lead to adequate lopinavir plasma concentrations. Generic and branded LPV/r have comparable PK-parameters.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Therapeutic Equivalency

To characterize the pharmacokinetics and inhibitory quotient (IQ) of atazanavir/ritonavir- and lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens in HIV-infected, treatment-naive patients.. The CASTLE Study was a 96 week randomized study comparing 300 mg of atazanavir once daily with 400 mg of lopinavir twice daily, each with low-dose ritonavir (100 mg) plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine in HIV-infected, treatment-naive patients. A subset of patients participated in an intensive pharmacokinetic evaluation of the atazanavir regimen (n = 18) and the lopinavir regimen (n = 21) at week 4. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00272779). Atazanavir geometric mean (CV%) C(max), C(min) and AUC over the dosing interval were 2897 (46) ng/mL, 526 (57) ng/mL and 28 605 (46) ng · h/mL, respectively, and for lopinavir they were 10 655 (51) ng/mL, 5944 (68) ng/mL and 90 946 (59) ng · h/mL, respectively. The baseline protein binding-adjusted 90% effective concentration (PBA-EC(90)) was 16 (44) ng/mL for atazanavir and 173 (44) ng/mL for lopinavir. The median IQ (min, max), calculated as the ratio of C(min) to individual baseline PBA-EC(90), was 35 (4, 77) for atazanavir and 34 (11, 129) for lopinavir. The C(max) for ritonavir was 46% higher, while AUC(0-24) and C(min) were 16% and 72% lower in the atazanavir regimen compared with the lopinavir regimen. Tenofovir exposures were similar with both treatments.. Atazanavir (300 mg once daily) and lopinavir (400 mg twice daily), each with low-dose ritonavir, achieved similar IQs in HIV-infected, treatment-naive patients. These results are supportive of the main clinical finding of the CASTLE Study, that the atazanavir/ritonavir-based regimen is non-inferior in antiviral efficacy to the lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen in antiretroviral-naive subjects.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Deoxycytidine; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) have antimalarial activity in vitro and in murine models. The potential beneficial effect of HIV-1 PIs on malaria has not been studied in clinical settings. We used data from Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5208 sites where malaria is endemic to compare the incidence of clinically diagnosed malaria among HIV-infected adult women randomized to either lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) or to nevirapine (NVP)-based ART. We calculated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We conducted a recurrent events analysis that included both first and second clinical malarial episodes and also conducted analyses to assess the sensitivity of results to outcome misclassification. Among the 445 women in this analysis, 137 (31%) received a clinical diagnosis of malaria at least once during follow-up. Of these 137, 72 (53%) were randomized to LPV/r-based ART. Assignment to the LPV/r treatment group (n = 226) was not consistent with a large decrease in the hazard of first clinical malarial episode (hazard ratio = 1.11 [0.79 to 1.56]). The results were similar in the recurrent events analysis. Sensitivity analyses indicated the results were robust to reasonable levels of outcome misclassification. In this study, the treatment with LPV/r compared to NVP had no apparent beneficial effect on the incidence of clinical malaria among HIV-infected adult women. Additional research concerning the effects of PI-based therapy on the incidence of malaria diagnosed by more specific criteria and among groups at a higher risk for severe disease is warranted.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Deoxycytidine; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Incidence; Lopinavir; Malaria; Nevirapine; Organophosphonates; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

Both HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy are associated with dyslipidemias in adults, but there are fewer data on outcomes in young children. Here we examined lipid profile changes in a cohort of young children before and after suppression on an initial ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r)-based regimen and after switch to a nevirapine (NVP)-based regimen.. One hundred ninety-five HIV-infected children who initiated LPV/r-based therapy when <24 months of age at 1 site in Johannesburg, South Africa, and who achieved viral suppression (<400 copies/mL sustained for ≥ 3 months) were randomized to either continue on the LPV/r-based regimen (n = 99) or to switch to a NVP-based regimen (n = 96). Nonfasting concentrations of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides (TG) were measured pretreatment, at randomization when suppressed, and at 9, 20, and 31 months postrandomization.. Median age at treatment initiation was 9 months, and the initial regimen was maintained for an average of 9 months before randomization. TC, low-density lipoprotein, and HDL increased from pretreatment to randomization (P < 0.0001) and TC/HDL ratio and TG decreased (P < 0.0001). After switching to NVP, HDL was significantly higher (P < 0.02) and TC/HDL and TG significantly lower (P < 0.0001) through 31 months postswitch relative to remaining on the LPV/r-based regimen.. Initiating antiretroviral therapy was associated with changes to a more favorable lipid profile in young children. Switching from a LPV/r-based regimen to a NVP-based regimen accentuated and continued these improvements. Investigation of safe and effective methods for managing dyslipidemias in children of different ages in resource-limited settings is warranted.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Ritonavir; South Africa; Treatment Outcome

Improvements in neurocognitive (NC) function have been associated with commencing antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected subjects. However, the dynamics of such improvements are poorly understood.. We assessed changes in NC function via a validated computerized battery (CogState™, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) at baseline and after 24 and 48 weeks in a subset of therapy-naïve neuro-asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects, randomized to commence three different antiretroviral regimens.. Of 28 subjects enrolled in the study, nine, eight and 11 were randomly allocated to commence tenofovir/emtricitabine with efavirenz (arm 1), atazanavir/ritonavir (arm 2) and zidovudine/abacavir (arm 3), respectively. Overall improvements in NC function were observed at week 24 and function continued to improve at week 48 (changes in z-score for overall cognitive global score of 0.16 and 0.18 at weeks 24 and 48, respectively). Within the NC speed domains, generally greater improvements were observed in arms 2 and 3, compared with arm 1 (changes in z-score for composite speed scores at weeks 24/48 of 0.16/0.16, -0.29/-0.24 and -0.15/-0.31 in arms 1, 2 and 3, respectively; P = 0.04 for change at week 48 in arm 3 versus arm 1). Finally, improvements in executive function occurred later (only observed at week 48) and were driven by improvements in arm 3 (z-score changes of 0.23, 0.06 and -0.78 in arms 1, 2 and 3, respectively; P = 0.02 for change in arm 3 versus arm 1).. Improvements in NC function continue over the first year after initiating antiretroviral therapy in neuro-asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects.

Topics: Adenine; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Cyclopropanes; Deoxycytidine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Zidovudine

Long-term results at week 96 are needed to evaluate the capacity of the darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy strategy to maintain a sustained control of the HIV-1 viral load.. MONOI is a prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized, 96 week trial comparing darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus a darunavir/ritonavir triple-therapy strategy to maintain HIV-1 viral load suppression in HIV-1-infected patients.. NCT00412551.. From 225 randomized patients, 219 patients reached the 48 week follow-up and 211 reached the 96 week follow-up (106 patients in the darunavir monotherapy arm and 105 in the darunavir triple-therapy arm). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment groups. At week 96, in intent-to-treat analysis, 91/103 patients (88%, 95% CI 81-94) allocated to the darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm and 87/104 patients (84%, 95% CI 75-90) allocated to the darunavir triple-therapy arm achieved an HIV-1 viral load <50 copies/mL, with no statistical difference between the two groups. Throughout the 96 week follow-up, 66/112 patients (59%, 95% CI 49-68) and 79/113 patients (70%, 95% CI 61-78) consistently had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL with darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy and darunavir/ritonavir triple therapy, respectively.. The MONOI study establishes darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy as durable and efficacious for maintaining virological suppression in HIV-1 patients. Darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy should be considered as a (tailored) treatment option for standard triple-therapy patients who have had a substantial period of viral suppression.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The benefits of antiretroviral therapy during early human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection remain unproved.. A5217 study team randomized patients within 6 months of HIV-1 seroconversion to receive either 36 weeks of antiretrovirals (immediate treatment [IT]) or no treatment (deferred treatment [DT]). Patients were to start or restart antiretroviral therapy if they met predefined criteria. The primary end point was a composite of requiring treatment or retreatment and the log(10) HIV-1 RNA level at week 72 (both groups) and 36 (DT group).. At the June 2009 Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) review, 130 of 150 targeted participants had enrolled. Efficacy analysis included 79 individuals randomized ≥72 weeks previously. For the primary end point, the IT group at week 72 had a better outcome than the DT group at week 72 (P = .005) and the DT group at week 36 (P = .002). The differences were primarily due to the higher rate of progression to needing treatment in the DT group (50%) versus the IT (10%) group. The DSMB recommended stopping the study because further follow-up was unlikely to change these findings.. Progression to meeting criteria for antiretroviral initiation in the DT group occurred more frequently than anticipated, limiting the ability to evaluate virologic set point. Antiretrovirals during early HIV-1 infection modestly delayed the need for subsequent treatment.. NCT00090779.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Deoxycytidine; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Organophosphonates; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Here, we aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics of abacavir and carbovir triphosphate (CBV-TP) with darunavir/ritonavir 900/100 mg once daily or raltegravir 400 mg twice daily.. HIV-infected subjects on abacavir (600 mg once daily) underwent steady-state pharmacokinetic assessments without and with darunavir/ritonavir or raltegravir. Within-subject changes in plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated by geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% CIs.. A total of 19 patients completed the study. With darunavir/ritonavir (versus abacavir alone), abacavir GMRs (90% CI) were 0.73 (0.66, 0.80), 0.62 (0.50, 0.77) and 0.78 (0.69, 0.87) for area under the curve (AUC), trough concentration (C(trough)) and maximum concentration (C(max)), respectively. With raltegravir, they were 1.03 (0.97, 1.10), 0.83 (0.62, 1.11) and 1.06 (0.95, 1.18), respectively. Intracellular CBV-TP GMRs (90% CI) were 0.88 (0.72, 1.07), 0.68 (0.48, 0.95) and 0.98 (0.79, 1.23) for AUC, C(trough) and C(max), respectively, with darunavir/ritonavir, and 0.96 (0.76, 1.20), 0.57 (0.33, 1.00) and 1.07 (0.85, 1.35), respectively, with raltegravir.. There was a 27% decrease in abacavir plasma exposure with darunavir/ritonavir and no changes with raltegravir. CBV-TP C(trough) was significantly decreased with darunavir/ritonavir (32%) and showed a high inter-individual variability with raltegravir.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Darunavir; Deoxyguanine Nucleotides; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

A clinical trial comparing the rate of discontinuation and tolerability of two post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimens was performed.. A total of 255 individuals attending the emergency rooms of six hospitals for exposure to HIV and criteria to receive PEP were randomized to receive zidovudine/lamivudine plus either lopinavir/ritonavir (n=131) or atazanavir (n=124; day 0). The primary end point was the rate of PEP discontinuation before day 28 of follow-up. Secondary end points were incidence of side effects, follow-up at days 90 and 180 and rate of seroconversions.. A total of 55 patients (29 in lopinavir/ritonavir and 26 in atazanavir arms) did not attend the first scheduled appointment (day 1) and were excluded from the analysis. The rate of discontinuation before day 28 owing to any cause was similar between groups (37/102 [36%] in lopinavir/ritonavir and 35/98 [36%] in atazanavir arms, P=0.82). Adverse events were the reason for discontinuation or switching of PEP in 33 individuals (16/102 [16%] in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm and 17/98 [17%] in the atazanavir arm, P=0.84). Adverse events were reported in 92/200 (46%) of individuals on PEP who attend at least the day 1 appointment (50/102 [49%] in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm and 42/98 [43%] in the atazanavir arm, P=0.38). There were no seroconversions.. The rate of discontinuation of PEP before day 28 was similar with zidovudine/lamivudine plus either lopinavir/ritonavir or atazanavir. The rate of discontinuation of PEP because of adverse events was low in both arms. Almost 50% of the patients of both arms suffered side effects. New strategies are needed to improve the tolerance.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Oligopeptides; Post-Exposure Prophylaxis; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Zidovudine

Long-term potent activity of antiretrovirals is essential for HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced patients. TITAN (TMC114/r In Treatment-experienced pAtients Naive to lopinavir) compared Week-96 efficacy and safety of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) versus lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r). Treatment-experienced, LPV-naive, HIV-1-infected patients were randomised to DRV/r 600/100 mg bid or LPV/r 400/100 mg bid plus optimised background regimen (≥ 2 NRTIs/NNRTIs). 595 patients were enrolled (mean baseline HIV-1 RNA: 4.30 log10 copies/mL; median CD4 count: 232 cells/mm3). At Week 96, more DRV/r than LPV/r patients achieved HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL (66.8% versus 58.9% [intent-to-treat (ITT)/time-to-loss of virological response (TLOVR)], estimated difference 8.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-16.7), demonstrating the primary endpoint of non-inferiority of DRV/r (p < 0.001); the difference in response was statistically significant (p = 0.034). For the secondary efficacy parameter (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) at Week 96, response to DRV/r was 60.4% versus 55.2% for LPV/r (ITT-TLOVR), estimated difference 5.8%, 95% CI: -2.3-13.9. Virological failure (VF; HIV-1 RNA > 400 copies/mL) with DRV/r (13.8%) was nearly half that with LPV/r (25.6%). Discontinuations due to adverse events were 8.1% for both DRV/r and LPV/r. Treatment-related grade 2-4 diarrhoea was 8.1% (DRV/r) versus 15.2% (LPV/r). Increases in triglycerides and total cholesterol were less pronounced with DRV/r. At 96 weeks, noninferiority (HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL) of DRV/r over LPV/r was maintained; the difference in response was statistically significant. VF rate and treatment-related grade 2-4 diarrhoea were lower with DRV/r versus LPV/r.

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Logistic Models; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

The aim of the study was to evaluate fat tissue distribution in HIV-infected patients with suppressed viraemia treated with darunavir/ritonavir (darunavir/r) monotherapy versus darunavir/r triple therapy.. This study was a substudy of the randomized, multicentre, open-label MONOI-ANRS 136 trial. Body fat distribution and metabolic parameters were measured at baseline, week 48 and week 96.. In total, 156 patients of the 225 initially enrolled in the MONOI trial participated in this study, 75 in the darunavir/r monotherapy arm and 81 in the darunavir/r triple-therapy arm. The median limb fat increase from baseline was +0.34 kg [interquartile range (IQR) -0.040 to +1.140 kg; P < 0.001] at week 48 and +0.33 kg (IQR -0.14 to +1.26 kg; P = 0.001) at week 96 in the monotherapy arm, while there was no change (-0.02 kg; IQR -0.53 to +0.52 kg) at week 48 and then an increase of +0.23 kg (IQR -0.45 to +0.87 kg; P = 0.046) at week 96 in the triple-therapy arm. The two arms differed significantly at week 48 (P = 0.001) but not at week 96. The median increase in trunk fat was +0.73 kg (IQR -0.24 to +1.60 kg; P < 0.001) and 0.60 kg (IQR -0.41 to +1.49 kg; P = 0.03) at week 48 and +1.16 kg (IQR -0.17 to +2.75 kg; P < 0.001) and +0.90 kg (IQR -0.51 to +2.34 kg; P = 0.001) at week 96 in the monotherapy and triple-therapy arms, respectively, with no difference between arms. At week 96, the only biological change was a glucose level elevation in the monotherapy arm (median +4.0 mg/dL; IQR -4.0 to +7.0 mg/dL) compared with the triple-therapy arm (P = 0.012).. Overall, body fat tissue increased in patients on darunavir/r monotherapy and triple therapy, with no difference between the arms over 96 weeks. The only difference found was a delayed increase in limb fat tissue in the triple-therapy arm compared with the monotherapy arm in the first year.

Topics: Adult; Body Fat Distribution; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; France; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Protease-inhibitor-based treatment is recommended as first-line for infants infected with HIV who have been previously exposed to nevirapine prophylaxis. However, long-term use poses adherence challenges, is associated with metabolic toxic effects, restricts second-line options, and is costly. We present the long-term outcomes of switching nevirapine-exposed children to nevirapine-based treatment after effective suppression of virus replication with a protease-inhibitor-based regimen.. We did a randomised trial to compare long-term viral suppression with nevirapine-based versus protease-inhibitor-based (ritonavir-boosted lopinavir) treatment in children who had achieved suppression with protease-inhibitor-based treatment. Randomisation (1:1) was by cohort blocks of variable size between eight and 12. Eligible children were younger than 24 months who were previously exposed to nevirapine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission, and achieved virological suppression of less than 400 copies per mL when treated with the regimen based on ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in Johannesburg, South Africa. We gave all drugs as liquids and adjusted doses at each visit in accordance with growth. We continued follow-up for a minimum of 90 weeks and maximum of 232 weeks after randomisation. We quantified HIV RNA every 3 months. Our primary endpoint was any viraemia greater than 50 copies per mL. Our analysis was by modified intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00117728.. We followed up the children for a median of 156 weeks and there were three deaths in each group. Children in the switch group (Kaplan-Meier probability 0·595) were less likely to experience non-suppression greater than 50 copies per mL than in the control group (0·687; p=0·01) and had better CD4 and growth responses initially after switching (52 children in the switch group vs 66 control group met this endpoint). By 156 weeks after randomisation, more children had virological failure--which we defined as confirmed viraemia of more than 1000 copies per mL--in the switch group (22 children) than in the control group (ten children; p=0·009). We detected all 22 failures in the switch group by 52 weeks compared with five in the control group. Virological failure was related to non-adherence and pretreatment drug resistance. In children without pretreatment drug resistance, we did not identify a significant difference in virological failure between the switch (Kaplan-Meier probability 0·140) and control (0·095) groups (p=0·34; seven failures in the switch group vs five in the control group). Children in the switch group were significantly more likely to develop grade 1-3 alanine aminotransferase abnormalities over the duration of follow-up.. Viral-load testing through 52 weeks can identify all children likely to fail this protease-inhibitor-switch strategy. Switching children once suppressed to a nevirapine-based regimen might be a valuable treatment option if adequate viral-load monitoring can be done.. National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development and Secure the Future Foundation.

Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Anti-HIV Agents; Body Height; Body Weight; Chi-Square Distribution; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infant; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lopinavir; Male; Medication Adherence; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; Statistics, Nonparametric; Time Factors; Viral Load

QDMRK was a phase III clinical trial of raltegravir given once daily (QD) (800-mg dose) versus twice daily (BID) (400 mg per dose), each in combination with once-daily coformulated tenofovir-emtricitabine, in treatment-naive HIV-infected patients. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses were conducted using a 2-step approach: individual non-model-based PK parameters from observed sparse concentration data were determined, followed by statistical analysis of potential relationships between PK and efficacy response parameters after 48 weeks of treatment. Sparse PK sampling was performed for all patients (QD, n = 380; BID, n = 384); selected sites performed an intensive PK evaluation at week 4 (QD, n = 22; BID, n = 20). In the intensive PK subgroup, daily exposures (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC(0-24)]) were similar between the two regimens, but patients on 800 mg QD experienced ~4-fold-higher maximum drug concentration in plasma (C(max)) values and ~6-fold-lower trough drug concentration (C(trough)) values than those on 400 mg BID. Geometric mean (GM) C(trough) values were similarly lower in the sparse PK analysis. With BID dosing, there was no indication of any significant PK/PD association over the range of tested PK parameters. With QD dosing, C(trough) values correlated with the likelihood of virologic response. Failure to achieve an HIV RNA level of <50 copies/ml appeared predominantly at high baseline HIV RNA levels in both treatment arms and was associated with lower values of GM C(trough) in the 800-mg-QD arm, though other possible drivers of efficacy, such as time above a threshold concentration, could not be evaluated due to the sparse sampling scheme. Together, these findings emphasize the importance of the shape of the plasma concentration-versus-time curve for long-term efficacy.

Topics: Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Ritonavir

The aim of this open-label, fixed-sequence study was to investigate the potential of the botanical supplement milk thistle (silymarin) to interact with the boosted protease inhibitor combination darunavir-ritonavir. Fifteen HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy with darunavir-ritonavir (600/100 mg twice daily) for at least 4 weeks were included. Silymarin (150 mg every 8 h) was added to the antiretroviral treatment from days 1 to 14. Darunavir concentrations in plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography immediately before and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h after a morning dose of darunavir-ritonavir on day 0 and darunavir-ritonavir plus silymarin on day 14. Individual darunavir pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis and compared between days 0 and 14 by means of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) and its 90% confidence interval (CI). The median age was 48 years (interquartile range, 44 to 50 years), and the median body weight was 70 kg (interquartile range, 65 to 84 kg). Silymarin was well tolerated, and all participants completed the study. The GMRs for darunavir coadministered with silymarin relative to darunavir alone were 0.86 (90% CI, 0.70 to 1.05) for the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h, 0.83 (90% CI, 0.80 to 0.98) for the maximum concentration, and 0.94 (90% CI, 0.73 to 1.19) for the concentration at the end of the dosing interval. In summary, coadministration of silymarin with darunavir-ritonavir seems to be safe in HIV-infected patients; no dose adjustment for darunavir-ritonavir seems to be necessary.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Silybum marianum; Silymarin; Sulfonamides

We investigated the effect of food on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir in 12 Ugandan patients receiving lopinavir coformulated with ritonavir (LPV/r) tablets using a crossover design. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed 7 days apart after LPV/r dosing under moderate fat, high fat, and fasted meal conditions. Lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Compared with the fasted state, a high fat meal reduced lopinavir and ritonavir area under the curve by 14% and 29%, respectively. With a moderate fat meal, area under the curve for both drugs was similar to the fasted state.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Dietary Fats; Drug Administration Schedule; Eating; Fasting; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Uganda

Alcohol abuse has been associated with HIV/AIDS progression, but the effects of HIV infection and treatment on alcohol exposure have not been explored to date. This pilot study examines the relationship of untreated HIV infection to blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) relative to BAC after initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART).. Fifteen volunteers with untreated HIV/AIDS participated in 2 sets of alcohol or alcohol placebo administration studies before and after initiation of ART. Oral alcohol (1 g/kg) or alcohol placebo was administered, participants were followed for pharmacokinetics, subjective responses, and cognitive effects over 8 hours. After initial alcohol studies, the ART regimen selected by participant clinicians was instituted. Observed ART dosing took place for at least 2 weeks. Participants then returned for a second set of alcohol/placebo administration studies while on ART.. Participants had significantly higher BAC (P < 0.001) before ART than after ART administration. Alcohol area under the curve was significantly higher in untreated HIV disease (P = 0.011) with significantly higher C(max) (P = 0.015) and C(min) (P = 0.05). The elimination rate was not different between pre-ART and post-ART conditions. Despite declines in BAC after ART initiation, no differences in subjective responses were observed with alcohol administration.. Untreated HIV infection is associated with risk for higher BAC than that observed after ART. These findings indicate that patients with untreated HIV disease who ingest alcohol are at greater risk for alcohol associated adverse events and toxicities and underscores the need for simultaneous treatment of alcohol use disorders and HIV in patients with co-occurring conditions.

Topics: Adult; Alcoholism; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cognition; Cyclopropanes; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Ethanol; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Intestinal Absorption; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Ritonavir

HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) show antimalarial activity in vitro and in animals. Whether this translates into a clinical benefit in HIV-infected patients residing in malaria-endemic regions is unknown. We studied the incidence of malaria, as defined by blood smear positivity or a positive Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 antigen test, among 444 HIV-infected women initiating antiretroviral treatment (ART) in the OCTANE trial (A5208; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00089505). Participants were randomized to treatment with PI-containing vs. PI-sparing ART, and were followed prospectively for ≥48 weeks; 73% also received cotrimoxazole prophylaxis. PI-containing treatment was not associated with protection against malaria in this study population.

Topics: Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Malaria; Nevirapine; Ritonavir

To compare cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) darunavir and ritonavir concentrations in patients receiving darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily or 600/100 mg twice daily. To determine the influence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the genes encoding for blood-brain barrier transporters (ABCB1 3435 C>T, ABCB1 1236 C>T, ABCB1 2677 G>T, SLCO1A2 38 A>G, SLCO1A2 516 A>C, ABCC2 -24 G>A) on darunavir and ritonavir penetration into CSF.. Comparative pharmacokinetics study in patients.. Plasma and CSF darunavir and ritonavir concentrations (2-26 h after drug intake) were determined by a validated HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry method in adults on darunavir-based combination antiretroviral therapy undergoing a lumbar puncture.. HIV-infected patients on once-daily darunavir/ritonavir had significantly lower CSF darunavir trough concentrations and CSF-to-plasma ratios than patients on darunavir/ritonavir twice-daily (10.7 versus 38.2 ng/ml and 0.32 versus 0.90%; P < 0.05). No significant effect of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the genes encoding for blood-brain barrier transporters was noted apart from slightly higher CSF darunavir penetration in patients carrying OATP1A2 uncommon variants.. This is the first study to compare darunavir CSF concentrations in patients taking the once-daily or the twice-daily dosage: our data show that darunavir and ritonavir dosing significantly affects not only CSF concentrations but also the extent of drug penetration into the CSF. Furthermore a minority of patients in the once-daily arm presented very low CSF concentration of potential concern for HIV control in the central nervous system. The relative importance of pharmacogenetics in influencing CSF darunavir pharmacokinetics deserves further clinical investigation.

Topics: Adult; Blood-Brain Barrier; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Middle Aged; Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy is the predominant (and often the only) regimen available for children in resource-limited settings. Nevirapine resistance after exposure to the drug for prevention of maternal-to-child human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission is common, a problem that has led to the recommendation of ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in such settings. Regardless of whether there has been prior exposure to nevirapine, the performance of nevirapine versus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in young children has not been rigorously established.. In a randomized trial conducted in six African countries and India, we compared the initiation of HIV treatment with zidovudine, lamivudine, and either nevirapine or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in HIV-infected children 2 to 36 months of age who had no prior exposure to nevirapine. The primary end point was virologic failure or discontinuation of treatment by study week 24.. A total of 288 children were enrolled; the median percentage of CD4+ T cells was 15%, and the median plasma HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level was 5.7 log(10) copies per milliliter. The percentage of children who reached the primary end point was significantly higher in the nevirapine group than in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group (40.8% vs. 19.3%; P<0.001). Among the nevirapine-treated children with virologic failure for whom data on resistance were available, more than half (19 of 32) had resistance at the time of virologic failure. In addition, the time to a protocol-defined toxicity end point was shorter in the nevirapine group (P=0.04), as was the time to death (P=0.06).. Outcomes were superior with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir among young children with no prior exposure to nevirapine. Factors that may have contributed to the suboptimal results with nevirapine include elevated viral load at baseline, selection for nevirapine resistance, background regimen of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, and the standard ramp-up dosing strategy. The results of this trial present policymakers with difficult choices. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; P1060 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00307151.).

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Zidovudine

Nevirapine (NVP) is widely used in antiretroviral treatment (ART) of HIV-1 globally. The primary objective of the AA5208/OCTANE trial was to compare the efficacy of NVP-based versus lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based initial ART.. In seven African countries (Botswana, Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe), 500 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected women with CD4<200 cells/mm(3) were enrolled into a two-arm randomized trial to initiate open-label ART with tenofovir (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) once/day plus either NVP (n = 249) or LPV/r (n = 251) twice/day, and followed for ≥48 weeks. The primary endpoint was time from randomization to death or confirmed virologic failure ([VF]) (plasma HIV RNA<1 log(10) below baseline 12 weeks after treatment initiation, or ≥400 copies/ml at or after 24 weeks), with comparison between treatments based on hazard ratios (HRs) in intention-to-treat analysis. Equivalence of randomized treatments was defined as finding the 95% CI for HR for virological failure or death in the range 0.5 to 2.0. Baseline characteristics were (median): age = 34 years, CD4 = 121 cells/mm(3), HIV RNA = 5.2 log(10)copies/ml. Median follow-up = 118 weeks; 29 (6%) women were lost to follow-up. 42 women (37 VFs, five deaths; 17%) in the NVP and 50 (43 VFs, seven deaths; 20%) in the LPV/r arm reached the primary endpoint (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.56-1.29). During initial assigned treatment, 14% and 16% of women receiving NVP and LPV/r experienced grade 3/4 signs/symptoms and 26% and 22% experienced grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities. However, 35 (14%) women discontinued NVP because of adverse events, most in the first 8 weeks, versus none for LPV/r (p<0.001). VF, death, or permanent treatment discontinuation occurred in 80 (32%) of NVP and 54 (22%) of LPV/r arms (HR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4), with the difference primarily due to more treatment discontinuation in the NVP arm. 13 (45%) of 29 women tested in the NVP versus six (15%) of 40 in the LPV/r arm had any drug resistance mutation at time of VF.. Initial ART with NVP+TDF/FTC demonstrated equivalent virologic efficacy but higher rates of treatment discontinuation and new drug resistance compared with LPV/r+TDF/FTC in antiretroviral-naïve women with CD4<200 cells/mm(3).. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00089505.

Topics: Adult; Africa; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Death; Drug Resistance, Viral; Endpoint Determination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lopinavir; Medication Adherence; Mutation; Nevirapine; Ritonavir

The HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor elvitegravir (EVG) has been co-formulated with the CYP3A4 inhibitor cobicistat (COBI), emtricitabine (FTC), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) into a once-daily, single tablet. We compared EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF with a ritonavir-boosted (RTV) protease inhibitor regimen of atazanavir (ATV)/RTV+FTC/TDF as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection.. This phase 3, non-inferiority study enrolled treatment-naive patients with an HIV-1 RNA concentration of 5000 copies per mL or more and susceptibility to atazanavir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF or ATV/RTV+FTC/TDF plus matching placebos, administered once daily. Randomisation was by a computer-generated random sequence, accessed via an interactive telephone and web response system. Patients, and investigators and study staff who gave treatments, assessed outcomes, or analysed data were masked to the assignment. The primary endpoint was HIV RNA concentration of 50 copies per mL or less after 48 weeks (according to the US FDA snapshot algorithm), with a 12% non-inferiority margin. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01106586.. 1017 patients were screened, 715 were enrolled, and 708 were treated (353 with EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF and 355 with ATV/RTV+FTC/TDF). EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was non-inferior to ATV/RTV+FTC/TDF for the primary outcome (316 patients [89·5%] vs 308 patients [86·8%], adjusted difference 3·0%, 95% CI -1·9% to 7·8%). Both regimens had favourable safety and tolerability; 13 (3·7%) versus 18 (5·1%) patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Fewer patients receiving EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF had abnormal results in liver function tests than did those receiving ATV/RTV+FTC/TDF and had smaller median increases in fasting triglyceride concentration (90 μmol/L vs 260 μmol/L, p=0·006). Small median increases in serum creatinine concentration with accompanying decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate occurred in both study groups by week 2; they generally stabilised by week 8 and did not change up to week 48 (median change 11 μmol/L vs 7 μmol/L).. If regulatory approval is given, EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF would be the first integrase-inhibitor-based regimen given once daily and the only one formulated as a single tablet for initial HIV treatment.. Gilead Sciences.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Cobicistat; Deoxycytidine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Quinolones; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Thiazoles

There is little data on responses to combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) among HIV-infected children in the West African region. We describe treatment outcomes among HIV-1 and HIV-2 infected children initiating cART in a research clinic in The Gambia, West Africa.. All treatment naive HIV-infected children who initiated cART according to the WHO ART guidelines for children between October 2004 and December 2009 were included in the analysis. Kaplan-Meir estimates and sign-rank test were used to investigate the responses to treatment.. 65 HIV-1 and five HIV-2 infected children aged < 15 years were initiated on cART over this time period. HIV-1 infected children were treated with a combination of Zidovudine or Stavudine + Lamivudine + Nevirapine or Efavirenz while children with HIV-2 were treated with Zidovudine + Lamivudine + ritonavir-boosted Lopinavir. HIV-1 infected children were followed-up for a median (IQR) duration of 20.1 months (6.9 - 34.3), with their median (IQR) age at treatment initiation, CD4% and plasma viral load at baseline found to be 4.9 years (2.1 - 9.1), 13.0% (7.0 - 16.0) and 5.4 log10 copies/ml (4.4 - 6.0) respectively. The median age at treatment initiation of the five HIV-2 infected children was 12 years (range: 4.6 - 14.0) while their median baseline CD4+ T cell count and HIV-2 viral load were 140 cells/mm3 (Range: 40 - 570 cells/mm3) and 4.5 log10copies/mL (Range: 3.1 - 4.9 log10copies/mL) respectively.Among HIV-1 infected children <5 years of age at ART initiation, the median (IQR) increases in CD4% from baseline to 12, 24 and 36 months were 14% (8 - 19; P = 0.0004), 21% (15 - 22; P = 0.005) and 15% (15 - 25; P = 0.0422) respectively, while the median (IQR) increase in absolute CD4 T cell count from baseline to 12, 24 and 36 months for those ≥5 years at ART initiation were 470 cells/mm3 (270 - 650; P = 0.0005), 230 cells/mm3 (30 - 610; P = 0.0196) and 615 cells/mm3 (250 - 1060; P = 0.0180) respectively. The proportions of children achieving undetectable HIV-1 viral load at 6-, 12-, 24- and 36 months of treatment were 24/38 (63.2%), 20/36 (55.6%), 8/22 (36.4%) and 7/12 (58.3%) respectively. The probability of survival among HIV-1 infected children after 12 months on ART was 89.9% (95% CI 78.8 - 95.3). CD4 T cell recovery was sub-optimal in all the HIV-2 infected children and none achieved virologic suppression. Two of the HIV-2 infected children died within 6 months of starting treatment while the remaining three were lost to follow-up.. The beneficial effects of cART among HIV-1 infected children in our setting are sustained in the first 24 months of treatment with a significant improvement in survival experience up to 36 months; however the outcome was poor in the few HIV-2 infected children initiated on cART.

Topics: Adolescent; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gambia; HIV Infections; HIV-1; HIV-2; Humans; Infant; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Nevirapine; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Zidovudine

Boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) monotherapy (bPImono) potentially has substantial cost, safety and operational benefits. It has never been evaluated as second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Africa.. After 24 weeks of lopinavir/ritonavir-containing second-line therapy, DART participants were randomized to remain on combination therapy (CT), or change to bPImono maintenance (SARA trial; ISRCTN53817258). Joint primary end points were CD4(+) T-cell changes 24 weeks later and serious adverse events (SAEs); retrospectively assayed viral load (VL) was a secondary end point. Analyses were intention-to-treat.. A total of 192 participants were randomized to CT (n=95) or bPImono (n=97) and followed for median 60 weeks (IQR 45-84). Participants received median 4.0 years (IQR 3.5-4.4) first-line ART. Median CD4(+) T-cell count at first-line failure was 86 cells/mm(3) (47-136), increasing to 245 cells/mm(3) (173-325) after 24-week induction when 77% had VL<50 copies/ml. Overall, 44 (23%) were receiving second-line therapy with bPI and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) only, and 148 (77%) with bPI plus non-NRTI (NNRTI) with or without NRTI. At 24 weeks after randomization to CT versus bPImono, mean CD4(+) T-cell increase was 42 (CT, n=85) versus 49 cells/mm(3) (bPImono, n=88; adjusted difference 13 [95% CI -15, 43], P=0.37; non-inferior compared with predetermined non-inferiority margin [-33]). Virological suppression was greater for CT versus bPImono (trend P=0.009): 77% (70/91) versus 60% (56/94) were <50 copies/ml, and 5% (5) versus 14% (13) were ≥1,000 copies/ml, respectively. A total of 0 (0%) versus 5 (5%) participants had major protease inhibitor mutations and 3 (3%) versus 0 (0%) new NNRTI/NRTI mutations were detected during follow-up. Two participants (1 CT and 1 bPImono) died >24 weeks after randomization, and 5 (2 CT and 3 bPImono) experienced SAEs (P=0.51).. bPImono following a 24-week second-line induction was associated with similar CD4(+) T-cell response, but increased low-level viraemia, generally without protease inhibitor resistance. Longer-term trials are needed to provide definitive evidence about effectiveness in Africa.

Topics: Adult; Africa; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Viremia

A higher proportion of intermittent viremia (to have a HIV-1 RNA viral load>50 copies/mL not confirmed) was reported in the boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy arm in some studies including MONOI trial, and that could have an impact on the replenishment of the HIV-1 DNA reservoirs. The HIV-1 DNA level is an interesting marker which reflects the size of cellular HIV reservoir. Our objectives were to study the impact of 96 weeks of Darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus a triple standard combination on the HIV-1 blood reservoir and factors associated with HIV-1 plasma DNA at baseline in MONOI trial sub-study.. This sub-study is focused on 160 patients (79 patients in monotherapy arm and 81 in tritherapy arm) for whom blood cells were available both at baseline and at week 96 (W96). Baseline HIV-1 plasma DNA was associated with CD4 nadir, pre therapeutic HIV-1 RNA viral load and baseline HIV-1 RNA measured by ultrasensitive assay. A similar median delta HIV-DNA was observed between D0 and W96 in both arms; 0.35 log copies/10(6) leucocytes in monotherapy arm versus 0.51 log copies/10(6) leucocytes in tritherapy arm.. Despite a higher proportion of intermittent viremia in monotherapy arm, a similar evolution of cellular HIV-1 DNA level was observed between mono and triple therapy arm.. ClinicalTrials. gov NCT00421551.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; DNA, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load; Viremia

BMS-663068 is a prodrug of the small-molecule inhibitor BMS-626529, which inhibits human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection by binding to gp120 and interfering with the attachment of virus to CD4+ T-cells.. Fifty HIV-1-infected subjects were randomized to 1 of 5 regimen groups (600 mg BMS-663068 plus 100 mg ritonavir every 12 hours [Q12H], 1200 mg BMS-663068 plus 100 mg ritonavir every bedtime, 1200 mg BMS-663068 plus 100 mg ritonavir Q12H, 1200 mg BMS-663068 Q12H plus 100 mg ritonavir every morning, or 1200 mg BMS-663068 Q12H) for 8 days in this open-label, multiple-dose, parallel study. The study assessed the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of BMS-663068.. The maximum median decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA load from baseline ranged from 1.21 to 1.73 log(10) copies/mL. Plasma concentrations of BMS-626529 were not associated with an antiviral response, while low baseline inhibitory concentrations and the minimum and average steady-state BMS-626529 plasma concentrations, when adjusted by the baseline protein binding-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration (inhibitory quotient), were linked with antiviral response. BMS-663068 was generally well tolerated.. Administration of BMS-663068 for 8 days with or without ritonavir resulted in substantial declines in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and was generally well tolerated. Longer-term clinical trials of BMS-663068 as part of combination antiretroviral therapy are warranted. Clinical Trials Registration.NCT01009814.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Piperazines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect on fasting lipid parameters of switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus emtricitabine (FTC) from abacavir (ABC) plus lamivudine (3TC; both fixed-dose combinations), while maintaining ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r).. This was an open-label randomized two-arm 12-week controlled study in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients with elevated cholesterol (≥5.2 mmol/l). Patients stable on ABC/3TC plus LPV/r either continued treatment or switched to TDF/FTC plus LPV/r for 12 weeks. Standard efficacy and safety end points (including fasting lipids) were assessed.. In total, 85 subjects were treated (n=42 ABC/FTC and n=43 TDF/3TC). A statistically significant decrease in total cholesterol was observed in the TDF/FTC group: from median (IQR) 6.22 mmol/l (5.91-6.77) at baseline to 5.75 mmol/l (5.04-6.18) at week 12 (median [IQR] change from baseline -0.73 mmol/l [-1.20- -0.18]; P<0.001). No notable change was observed for the ABC/3TC group. The difference between groups at week 12 was -0.82 mmol/l (P<0.001). For TDF/FTC (but not for ABC/3TC), statistically significant reductions (P<0.05) from baseline were observed in total, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)- and non-HDL cholesterol (at weeks 4 and 12). Statistically significant decreases were observed in median estimated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) from baseline to week 12 for patients who switched to TDF/FTC (-5.47 ml/min) versus the ABC/3TC group (-2.15 ml/min; P=0.016 between groups). Virological suppression was maintained in both groups. No new safety issues were identified.. Switching to TDF/FTC from ABC/3TC was associated with rapid improvements in fasting lipid parameters and continued virological control in patients receiving LPV/r as the third component of antiretroviral therapy. The effect of these changes on clinical end points remains unclear and would need to be evaluated in a longer-term study.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol; Deoxycytidine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Drug Substitution; Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Organophosphorus Compounds; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Data on lopinavir/ritonavir tablets administered once daily in children are limited. We compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily versus once daily in virologically suppressed, HIV-infected children, and assessed the virological outcome, at 48 weeks, in children receiving the regimen of lopinavir/ritonavir once daily.. HIV-infected children receiving a twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen and with an HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) <40 copies/mL for at least 3 months were enrolled. Intensive steady-state 12 h blood sampling for PK assessment was performed at enrolment. Immediately afterwards, the lopinavir/ritonavir dose was changed to once daily with the equivalent daily dose, and intensive steady-state 24 h blood sampling was repeated 2 weeks later. If the lopinavir C(trough) was <1.0 μg/mL, the lopinavir/ritonavir dose was increased by 20%-30% and C(trough) measurement repeated. CD4 cell counts and VL were determined at baseline and at 12, 24 and 48 weeks.. Twelve children were enrolled. The median age was 13.1 years. Lopinavir AUC(0-24) following twice-daily and once-daily dosing was 169.7 (124.0-200.8) and 167.1 (95.1-228.1) μg · h/mL, respectively. Seven children, including all six concomitantly receiving efavirenz, had a C(trough) <1.0 μg/mL with once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir dosing, and four of seven children had a C(trough) <1.0 μg/mL after dose adjustment. All children maintained virological suppression throughout the 48 week period.. Lopinavir/ritonavir-based once-daily regimens could simplify therapy in children/adolescents with virological control, but a lower lopinavir C(trough) was evident. Further efficacy studies of lopinavir/ritonavir once daily in children are necessary before routinely recommending this dosing strategy.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Plasma; Ritonavir; Tablets; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The authors had for aim to describe the effectiveness and the safety of a saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/r) regimen, 1000/100mg twice daily, in HIV-infected pregnant patients.. We made a prospective and observational study of HIV positive female patients beginning or going on SQV/r antiretroviral treatment (ART) during pregnancy.. Sixty-two patients were enrolled from July 2007 to June 2009 in 10 infectious diseases units in France. Thirty-six women (group 1) were ART naive on inclusion, 20 (group 2) had been previously treated and then switched to SQV/r, six (group 3) were treated with SQV/r before pregnancy. 58 patients delivered while on SQV/r regimen after a median pregnancy duration of 39 WA. Eighty percent had a viral load below 50 copies/mL and 93% below 400 copies/mL: respectively 77% and 93.5% in group 1, 83% and 89% in group 2, 83% and 100% in group 3. The median SQV minimum concentrations (C(min)) measured at the third trimester and at delivery were adequate, respectively 0.91 mg/L and 0.86 mg/L. Most women (52%) had a vaginal delivery; 12 (21%) had an elective caesarean section, for obstetrics factors in eight cases. None of the newborns were HIV-infected at 6 months of age (n = 59, one death at day 3). Only one severe adverse event occurred due to saquinavir (maternal grade 3 hepatotoxicity).. SQV/r 1000/100mg twice daily seems to be effective and safe in HIV-infected pregnant women with adequate saquinavir C(min).

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cohort Studies; Delivery, Obstetric; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-2; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Male; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Outcome; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Viremia; Young Adult; Zidovudine

We compared rates of neurocognitive impairment (NCI) among 93 Thai adults failing non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) before and after switching to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (mLPV/r) vs. tenofovir/lamivudine/LPV/r (TDF/3TC/LPV/r). Participants completed the Color Trails 1 and 2, Digit Symbol, and Grooved Pegboard at weeks 0, 24, and 48. We calculated z-scores using normative data from 451 healthy HIV-negative Thais. We defined NCI as performance of <-1 SD on ≥2 tests. The Thai depression inventory was used to capture depressive symptoms. Lumbar puncture was optional at week 0 and 48. At baseline, median (IQR) age was 36.9 (32.8-40.5) years, and 46 % had primary school education or lower. The median CD4 count was 196 (107-292) cells/mm(3), and plasma HIV RNA was 4.1 (3.6-4.5) log(10) copies/ml. Almost all (97 %) had circulating recombinant CRF01_AE. At baseline, 20 (47 %) of the mLPV/r vs. 22 (44 %) of TDF/3TC/LPV/r arms met NCI criteria (p = 0.89). The frequency of NCI at week 48 was 30 vs. 32 % (p = 0.85) with 6 vs. 7 % (p = 0.85) developing NCI in the mLPV/r vs. TDF/3TC/LPV/r arms, respectively. Having NCI at baseline and lower education each predicted NCI at week 48. Depression scores at week 48 did not differ between arms (p = 0.47). Cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA of <50 copies/ml at 48 weeks was observed in five out of seven in mLPV/r vs. three out of four in TDF/3TC/LPV/r arm. The rates of NCI and depression did not differ among cases failing NNRTI-based cART who received mLPV/r compared to LPV/r triple therapy.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Organophosphonates; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Viral Load

: Switching from boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r) to raltegravir (RAL) results in a better plasma lipid profile than continuing PI/r. Whether this strategy affects plasma biomarkers associated with atherosclerosis is unknown.. : We assessed 48-week changes in fasting lipids and several biomarkers including serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), osteoprotegerin, interleukin (IL) 6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), E-selectin and P-selectin, adiponectin, insulin, and D-dimer in otherwise healthy, virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients treated with PI/r who randomly switched from PI/r to RAL or continued with PI/r in the SPIRAL trial. Biomarkers and lipids at baseline and 48-week changes between both study arms were compared. Correlations between changes in biomarkers and changes in lipids were also evaluated.. : Of 273 patients initiating study drugs in the SPIRAL trial, 233 (119 RAL, 114 PI/r) remained on allocated therapy for 48 weeks and had sera available for the purpose of this substudy. Triglycerides (-28%, P < 0.0001), total (-14%, P < 0.0001), low-density lipoprotein (-9%, P = 0.0069), and high-density lipoprotein (-10%, P = 0.0017) cholesterol decreased in RAL relative to the PI/r group. Among biomarkers, hsCRP (-40%, P < 0.0001), MCP-1 (-20%, P = 0.0003), osteoprotegerin (-13%, P = 0.0024), IL-6 (-46%,P < 0.0001), TNF-α (-27%, P = 0.0011), insulin (-26%, P < 0.0001), and D-dimer (-8%, P = 0.0187) decreased in RAL relative to PI/r group, whereas IL-10 (+1%, P = 0.7773), ICAM-1 (-6%, P = 0.1255), VCAM-1(0%, P = 0.8671), E-selectin (-9%, P = 0.2174), P-selectin (-6%, P = 0.3865), and adiponectin (+8%, P = 0.2028) remained unchanged. Biomarkers and lipids changes at 48 weeks were weakly correlated.. : Switching from PI/r to RAL induced significant changes in several cardiovascular biomarkers that were not completely explained by lipid changes.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atherosclerosis; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Chemokine CCL2; Drug Administration Schedule; E-Selectin; Fasting; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Interleukin-10; Interleukin-6; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoprotegerin; P-Selectin; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1

We investigated population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV), using drug intake times exactly recorded by the Medication Event Monitoring System. The ANRS 134-COPHAR 3 trial was conducted in 35 HIV-infected treatment-naive patients. ATV (300 mg), ritonavir (100 mg), and tenofovir (300 mg) + emtricitabine (200 mg), in bottles with MEMS caps, were taken once daily for 6 months. Six blood samples were collected at week 4 to measure drug concentrations, and trough levels were measured bimonthly. A model integrating ATV and ritonavir pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics used nonlinear mixed effects. Use of exact dosing data halved unexplained variability in ATV clearance. The ritonavir-ATV interaction model suggested that optimal boosting effect is achievable at lower ritonavir exposures. Patients with at least one copy of the CYP3A5*1 allele exhibited 28% higher oral clearance. We provide evidence that variability in ATV pharmacokinetics is defined by adherence, CYP3A5 genotype, and ritonavir exposure.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Aged; Alleles; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Deoxycytidine; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Nonlinear Dynamics; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pharmacogenetics; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Young Adult

Postnatal transmission of HIV-1 through breast milk remains an unsolved challenge in many resource-poor settings where replacement feeding is not a safe alternative. WHO now recommends breastfeeding of infants born to HIV-infected mothers until 12 months of age, with either maternal highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) or peri-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in infants using nevirapine. As PEP, lamivudine showed a similar efficacy and safety as nevirapine, but with an expected lower rate of resistant HIV strains emerging in infants who fail PEP, and lower restrictions for future HIV treatment. Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is an attractive PEP candidate with presumably higher efficacy against HIV than nevirapine or lamivudine, and a higher genetic barrier to resistance selection. It showed an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of very young HIV-infected infants. The ANRS 12174 study aims to compare the risk of HIV-1 transmission during and safety of prolonged infant PEP with LPV/r (40/10 mg twice daily if 2-4 kg and 80/20 mg twice daily if >4 kg) versus Lamivudine (7,5 mg twice daily if 2-4 kg, 25 mg twice daily if 4-8 kg and 50 mg twice daily if >8 kg) from day 7 until one week after cessation of BF (maximum 50 weeks of prophylaxis) to prevent postnatal HIV-1 acquisition between 7 days and 50 weeks of age.. The ANRS 12174 study is a multinational, randomised controlled clinical trial conducted on 1,500 mother-infant pairs in Burkina Faso, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia. We will recommend exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) until 26th week of life and cessation of breastfeeding at a maximum of 49 weeks in both trial arms.HIV-uninfected infants at day 7 (± 2 days) born to HIV-1 infected mothers not eligible for HAART who choose to breastfeed their infants.The primary endpoint is the acquisition of HIV-1 (as assessed by HIV-1 DNA PCR) between day 7 and 50 weeks of age. Secondary endpoints are safety (including resistance, adverse events and growth) until 50 weeks and HIV-1-free survival until 50 weeks.. This study will provide a new evidence-based intervention to support HIV-1-infected women not eligible for HAART to safely breastfeed their babies.

Topics: Africa; Anti-HIV Agents; Breast Feeding; Chemoprevention; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Pregnancy; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Data informing the use of boosted protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy as second-line treatment are limited. There are also no randomized trials addressing treatment options after failing first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-regimens.. HIV-infected subjects ≥18 years, with HIV RNA≥1,000 copies/ml while using NNRTI plus 2 NRTIs, and naive to PIs were randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 400/100 mg twice daily monotherapy (mono-LPV/r) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) once daily plus lamivudine (3TC) twice daily plus LPV/r 400/100 mg twice daily (TDF/3TC/LPV/r) at nine sites in Thailand. The primary outcome was time-weighted area under curve (TWAUC) change in HIV RNA over 48 weeks. The a priori hypothesis was that the mono-LPV/r arm would be considered non-inferior if the upper 95% confidence limit in TWAUC mean difference was ≤0.5 log(10) copies/ml.. The intention-to-treat (ITT) population comprised 195 patients (mono-LPV/r n=98 and TDF/3TC/LPV/r n=97): male 58%, baseline mean (sd) age of 38 (7) years, CD4(+) T-cell count of 204 (135) cells/mm(3) and HIV RNA of 4.1 (0.6) log(10) copies/ml. The majority had HIV-1 recombinant CRF01_AE infection, and thymidine analogue mutation (TAM)-2 was 3× more common than TAM-1. At 48 weeks, the difference in TWAUC HIV RNA between arms was 0.15 (95% CI -0.04, 0.33) log(10) copies/ml, consistent with our definition of non-inferiority. However, the proportion with HIV RNA<50 copies/ml was significantly lower in the mono-LPV/r arm: 61% versus 83% (ITT, P<0.01). Baseline HIV RNA≥5 log(10) copies/ml (P<0.001) and mono-LPV/r use (P=0.003) were predictors of virological failure. Baseline genotypic sensitivity scores ≥2 and TAM-2 were associated with better virological control in subjects treated with the TDF-containing regimen.. In PI-naive patients failing NNRTI-based first-line HAART, mono-LPV/r had a significantly lower proportion of patients with HIV RNA<50 copies/ml compared to the TDF/3TC/LPV/r treatment. Thus, mono-LPV/r should not be recommended as a second-line option.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Organophosphonates; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

The aim of this randomised, prospective, open-label, multicentre pilot clinical trial was to compare the 48-week toxicity profile of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy with LPV/r-based HAART (KaMon = Kaletra monotherapy) in HIV/HCV patients undergoing HCV treatment. The study involved 30 HIV/HCV co-infected patients naive to anti- HCV therapy. One patient in each arm (6.7%) discontinued anti-HCV therapy because of adverse events. There were no significant between-group differences in terms of the proportion of patients experiencing AEs (p=0.999) or the number of grade 3-4 AEs (p=0.146). No HIV failure was observed. The safety profile of LPV/r monotherapy was similar to that of LPV/r-based HAART, thus encouraging HAART simplification in patients receiving anti-HCV treatment.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Coinfection; Female; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Young Adult

Although specific human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drug resistance mutations are well studied, little is known about cumulative amino acid changes, or how regimen and participant characteristics influence these changes.. In the AIDS Clinical Trials Group randomized study A5202 of treatment-naive HIV-infected participants, cumulative HIV-1 amino acid changes from pretreatment to virologic failure were evaluated in protease and reverse transcriptase (RT) gene sequences.. Among 265 participants with virologic failure, those assigned atazanavir plus ritonavir (ATV/r) did not have significantly more protease changes compared with those assigned efavirenz (EFV) (P ≥ .13). In contrast, participants with virologic failure assigned EFV had more RT changes, including and excluding known resistance codons (P < .001). At pretreatment, lower CD4 cell count, major resistance, more amino acid mixtures (all P < .001), hepatitis C antibody negativity (P = .05), and black race/ethnicity (P = .02) were associated with more HIV-1 amino acid changes.. Virologic failure following EFV-containing treatment was associated with more HIV-1 amino acid changes compared to failure of ATV/r-containing treatment. Furthermore, we show that non-drug resistance mutations occurred more frequently among those failing EFV, the clinical relevance of which warrants further investigation. Pretreatment immunologic status may play a role in viral evolution during treatment, as evidenced by increased amino acid changes among those with lower pretreatment CD4 count.. NCT00118898.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Amino Acid Substitution; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutation, Missense; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Treatment Failure

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors show activity against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. We hypothesized that the incidence of malaria in HIV-infected children would be lower among children receiving lopinavir-ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) than among those receiving nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based ART.. We conducted an open-label trial in which HIV-infected children 2 months to 5 years of age who were eligible for ART or were currently receiving NNRTI-based ART were randomly assigned to either lopinavir-ritonavir-based ART or NNRTI-based ART and were followed for 6 months to 2 years. Cases of uncomplicated malaria were treated with artemether-lumefantrine. The primary end point was the incidence of malaria.. We enrolled 176 children, of whom 170 received the study regimen: 86 received NNRTI-based ART, and 84 lopinavir-ritonavir-based ART. The incidence of malaria was lower among children receiving the lopinavir-ritonavir-based regimen than among those receiving the NNRTI-based regimen (1.32 vs. 2.25 episodes per person-year; incidence-rate ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.97; P=0.04), as was the risk of a recurrence of malaria after treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (28.1% vs. 54.2%; hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.76; P=0.004). The median lumefantrine level on day 7 after treatment for malaria was significantly higher in the lopinavir-ritonavir group than in the NNRTI group. In the lopinavir-ritonavir group, lumefantrine levels exceeding 300 ng per milliliter on day 7 were associated with a reduction of more than 85% in the 63-day risk of recurrent malaria. A greater number of serious adverse events occurred in the lopinavir-ritonavir group than in the NNRTI group (5.6% vs. 2.3%, P=0.16). Pruritus occurred significantly more frequently in the lopinavir-ritonavir group, and elevated alanine aminotransferase levels significantly more frequently in the NNRTI group.. Lopinavir-ritonavir-based ART as compared with NNRTI-based ART reduced the incidence of malaria by 41%, with the lower incidence attributable largely to a significant reduction in the recurrence of malaria after treatment with artemether-lumefantrine. Lopinavir-ritonavir-based ART was accompanied by an increase in serious adverse events. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00978068.).

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antimalarials; Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination; Artemisinins; Child, Preschool; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ethanolamines; Female; Fluorenes; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Incidence; Infant; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lopinavir; Malaria; Male; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Secondary Prevention; Uganda

The ANRS EP45 "Aging" study investigates the cellular mechanisms involved in the accelerated aging of HIV-1 infected and treated patients. The present report focuses on lamin A processing, a pathway known to be altered in systemic genetic progeroid syndromes.. 35 HIV-1 infected patients being treated with first line antiretroviral therapy (ART, mean duration at inclusion: 2.7±1.3 years) containing boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r) (comprising lopinavir/ritonavir in 65% of patients) were recruited together with 49 seronegative age- and sex-matched control subjects (http://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT01038999). In more than 88% of patients, the viral load was <40 copies/ml and the CD4+ cell count was >500/mm³. Prelamin A processing in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients and controls was analysed by western blotting at inclusion. PBMCs from patients were also investigated at 12 and 24 months after enrolment in the study. PBMCs from healthy controls were also incubated with boosted lopinavir in culture medium containing various concentrations of proteins (4 to 80 g/L).. Lamin A precursor was not observed in cohort patient PBMC regardless of the PI/r used, the dose and the plasma concentration. Prelamin A was detected in PBMC incubated in culture medium containing a low protein concentration (4 g/L) but not in plasma (60-80 g/L) or in medium supplemented with BSA (40 g/L), both of which contain a high protein concentration.. Prelamin A processing abnormalities were not observed in PBMCs from patients under the PI/r first line regimen. Therefore, PI/r do not appear to contribute to lamin A-related aging in PBMCs. In cultured PBMCs from healthy donors, prelamin A processing abnormalities were only observed when the protein concentration in the culture medium was low, thus increasing the amount of PI available to enter cells. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01038999 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01038999.

Topics: Aging; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamin Type A; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Longitudinal Studies; Lopinavir; Male; Nuclear Proteins; Oligopeptides; Protein Precursors; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Efavirenz is an inducer of drug metabolism enzymes. We studied the effect of efavirenz and ritonavir-boosted darunavir on serum unconjugated and conjugated bilirubin, as probes for UGT1A1 and bile transporters.. Healthy volunteers were enrolled in a clinical trial. There were 3 periods: Period 1, 10 days of darunavir 900 mg with ritonavir 100 mg once daily; Period 2, 14 days of efavirenz 600 mg with darunavir/ritonavir once daily; and Period 3, 14 days of efavirenz 600 mg once daily. Serum bilirubin (conjugated and unconjugated) concentrations were obtained at baseline, at the end of each phase and at exit.. We recruited 7 males and 5 females. One subject developed grade 3 hepatitis on efavirenz and was excluded. Mean serum unconjugated bilirubin concentrations were 6.09 μmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.99 to 7.19) at baseline, 5.82 (95% CI, 4.88 to 6.76) after darunavir/ritonavir, 4.00 (95% CI, 2.92 to 5.08) after darunavir/ritonavir with efavirenz, 3.55 (95% CI, 2.58 to 4.51) after efavirenz alone and 5.27 (95% CI, 3.10 to 7.44) at exit (P <0.01 for the efavirenz phases). Mean serum conjugated bilirubin concentrations were 3.55 μmol/L (95% CI, 2.73 to 4.36) at baseline, 3.73 (95% CI, 2.77 to 4.68) after darunavir/ritonavir, 2.91 (95% CI, 2.04 to 3.78) after darunavir/ritonavir with efavirenz, 2.64 (95% CI, 1.95 to 3.33) after efavirenz alone and 3.55 (95% CI, 2.19 to 4.90) at exit (P <0.05 for the efavirenz phases).. Efavirenz decreased unconjugated bilirubin by 42%, suggesting UGT1A1 induction. Efavirenz also decreased conjugated bilirubin by 26%, suggesting induction of bile efflux transporters. Ritonavir-boosted darunavir had no effect on bilirubin concentrations. These results indicate that efavirenz may reduce concentrations of drugs or endogenous substances metabolized by UGT1A1 or excreted by bile efflux transporters.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Biological Transport; Confidence Intervals; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Enzyme Induction; Female; Glucuronosyltransferase; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Incidental Findings; Male; Membrane Transport Proteins; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

Atazanavir, a potent protease inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), exhibits pH-dependent solubility. Previous studies have indicated that coadministration with omeprazole 40 mg once daily significantly decreased atazanavir exposure by approximately 75%. Concomitant use of omeprazole and atazanavir is currently not recommended. This study investigated a clinically effective, low dose of omeprazole (20 mg daily) on atazanavir pharmacokinetics in 56 healthy volunteers given atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 and 400/100 mg once daily. All atazanavir/ritonavir plus omeprazole combinations resulted in atazanavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and trough concentrations (C(min)) comparable to or exceeding those observed with atazanavir 400 mg without omeprazole. Compared with atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg without omeprazole, atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg plus omeprazole reduced atazanavir AUC and C(min) by 42% and 46%, respectively. Increasing the atazanavir/ritonavir dose to 400/100 mg attenuated the effect of omeprazole, resulting in approximately 30% lower atazanavir C(min), with all individual C(min) values exceeded by greater than 10-fold the population mean protein binding-adjusted EC(90) against wild-type HIV. The effect of omeprazole on atazanavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg was similar whether given 1 hour prior to atazanavir/ritonavir or separated by 12 hours. No unexpected adverse events were noted. This study found that omeprazole 20 mg once daily has significantly less profound effects on atazanavir pharmacokinetics than previously observed with omeprazole 40 mg.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Area Under Curve; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Omeprazole; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Pyridines; Ritonavir

The aim of the study was to compare changes in bone mineral density (BMD) over 144 weeks in HIV-infected patients initiating nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing or protease inhibitor-sparing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).. Sixty-three HAART-naïve patients were randomized to zidovudine/lamivudine+efavirenz or lopinavir/ritonavir+efavirenz. We performed dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at baseline and at weeks 24, 48, 96 and 144 to evaluate lumbar spine and femoral neck (hip) BMD.. At baseline, 33 patients (55.9%) had low BMD (T-score < -1.0) and of these eight had osteoporosis (T-score < -2.5). Spine BMD declined in both arms until week 24, before stabilizing. In the NRTI-sparing arm, the mean percentage change from baseline was -2.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) -3.9 to -1.4] at week 24 and -2.5% (95% CI -5.4 to 0.3) at week 144, compared with -3.2% (95% CI -4.4 to -2.1) and -1.9% (95% CI -3.5 to -0.3) in the protease inhibitor-sparing arm. Hip BMD declined until week 48 before stabilizing. In the NRTI-sparing arm, BMD had decreased by -5.1% (95% CI -7.1 to -3.1) at week 48 and -4.5% (95% CI -6.9 to -2.1) at week 144, compared with -6.1% (95% CI -8.2 to -4.0) and -5.0% (95% CI -6.8 to -3.1) in the protease inhibitor-sparing arm. There were no significant differences between arms. Low baseline CD4 cell count was independently associated with spine (P=0.007) and hip (P=0.04) BMD loss and low body mass index with hip BMD loss (P=0.03).. Spine and hip BMD declined rapidly 24 to 48 weeks after initiating HAART, independent of the assigned drug class, but thereafter BMD values remained stable.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Alkynes; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Bone Density; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Zidovudine

The aim of the study was to determine total and unbound lopinavir (LPV) plasma concentrations in HIV-infected pregnant women receiving lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r tablet) undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) during pregnancy and postpartum.. Women were enrolled in the study who were receiving the LPV/r tablet as part of their routine prenatal care. Demographic and clinical data were collected and LPV plasma (total) and ultrafiltrate (unbound) concentrations were determined in the first, second and third trimesters using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Postpartum sampling was performed where applicable. Antepartum and postpartum trough concentrations (C(trough) ) were compared independently [using analysis of variance (anova)] and on a longitudinal basis (using a paired t-test).. Forty-six women were enrolled in the study (38 Black African). Forty women initiated LPV/r treatment in pregnancy. Median (range) gestation at initiation was 25 (15-36) weeks and median (range) baseline CD4 count and viral load were 346 (14-836) cells/μL and 8724 (<50-267408) HIV-1 RNA copies/mL, respectively. Forty women (87%) had LPV concentrations above the accepted minimum effective concentration for wild-type virus (MEC; 1000 ng/mL). Geometric mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) total LPV concentrations in the first/second [3525 (2823-4227) ng/mL; n=16] and third [3346 (2813-3880) ng/mL; n=43] trimesters were significantly lower relative to postpartum [5136 (3693-6579) ng/mL; n=12] (P=0.006). In a paired analysis (n=12), LPV concentrations were reduced in the third trimester [3657 (2851-4463) ng/mL] vs. postpartum (P=0.021). No significant differences were observed in the LPV fraction unbound (fu%). Conclusions The above target concentrations achieved in the majority of women and similarities in the fu% suggest standard dosing of the LPV/r tablet is appropriate during pregnancy. However, reduced LPV concentrations in the second/third trimesters and potentially compromised adherence highlight the need for TDM-guided dose adjustment in certain cases.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Monitoring; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Young Adult

To evaluate strategies to reduce HIV-1 transmission through breastfeeding, a multicentre study including a nested randomized controlled trial was implemented in five research sites in West, East and South Africa (The Kesho Bora Study). The aim was to optimize the use of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs during pregnancy, delivery and breastfeeding to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 (PMTCT) and to preserve the health of the HIV-1-infected mother. The study included long-term ARV treatment for women with advanced disease, and short-course ARV prophylaxis stopped at delivery for women with early disease. Women with intermediate disease participated in a randomized controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of triple-ARV prophylaxis prolonged during breastfeeding with short-course ARV prophylaxis stopped at delivery. Between January 2005 and August 2008 a total of 1140 women were enrolled. This paper describes the study design, interventions and protocol amendments introduced to adapt to evolving scientific knowledge, international guidelines and availability of ARV treatment. The paper highlights the successes and challenges during the conduct of the trial. The Kesho Bora Study included one of the few randomized controlled trials to assess safety and efficacy of ARV prophylaxis continued during breastfeeding and the only randomized trial to assess maternal prophylaxis started during pregnancy. The findings have been important for informing international and national guidelines on MTCT prevention in developing countries where, due to poverty, lack of reliable and affordable supply of replacement feed and stigma associated with HIV/AIDS, HIV-infected women have little or no option other than to breastfeed their infants. (ISRCTN71468401).

Topics: Africa, Eastern; Africa, Southern; Africa, Western; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Breast Feeding; Child, Preschool; Clinical Protocols; Cohort Studies; Delivery, Obstetric; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Mothers; Nevirapine; Pregnancy; Pyrimidinones; Research Design; Ritonavir; Zidovudine

The aim of this study was to evaluate the plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics of raltegravir in HIV-infected patients receiving once-daily raltegravir. Five HIV-infected patients on stable therapy with lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy whose HIV-1 RNA load was <50 copies/ml were included in this open-label, pilot study. Raltegravir was added to the antiretroviral regimen at a dose of 800 mg once daily from days 0 to 10. On day 10, a full pharmacokinetic profile was obtained for each participant. Raltegravir concentrations in plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with a fluorescence detector and by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), respectively. The values of the raltegravir pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma and PBMCs were calculated by noncompartmental analysis. Raltegravir was well tolerated, and all participants completed the study. No differences in the times to the maximum concentration of raltegravir in plasma or the raltegravir half-lives were observed between plasma and PBMCs. The geometric mean raltegravir maximum concentration, the concentration at the end of the dosing interval, and the area under the concentration-time curve during the dose interval in plasma versus PBMCs were 2,640 ng/ml (range, 887 to 10,605 ng/ml) versus 199 ng/ml (range, 82 to 857 ng/ml) (geometric mean ratio [GMR], 13.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.11 to 56.89; P = 0.003); 89 ng/ml (range, 51 to 200 ng/ml) versus 7 ng/ml (range, 2 to 15 ng/ml) (GMR, 13.21; 95% CI, 3.94 to 44.26; P = 0.001); and 12,200 ng·h/ml (range, 5,152 to 30,130 ng·h/ml) versus 909 ng·h/ml (range, 499 to 2,189 ng·h/ml) (GMR, 13.43; 95% CI, 5.13 to 35.16; P < 0.001), respectively. Raltegravir does not accumulate in PBMCs, with intracellular concentrations being about 1/10 of the concentrations in plasma. Despite once-daily dosing, mean raltegravir concentrations at the end of the dosing interval in plasma and PBMCs exceeded the reported protein-binding-adjusted 95% inhibitory concentration (IC(95)) and IC(50) for wild-type viral strains, respectively.

Topics: Cells, Cultured; Drug Administration Schedule; HIV Infections; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Ritonavir

The purpose of this study was to determine if switching to an Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-containing regimen resulted in greater immune reconstitution in patients with immunologic failure despite complete viral suppression with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Twenty patients with partial or no immune response to HAART despite viral suppression were enrolled. Ten were randomized to stay on their current regimen and 10 were randomized to LPV/r plus their current NRTI backbone. T cell subsets, ex vivo apoptosis, and the percent of circulating cells with detectable intracellular HIV-1 RNA were measured. The mean increase in CD4(+) count at 6 months was 116/mm(3) (172-288) for the LPV/r-containing arm versus 32/mm(3) (264-296) for continuation regimens (p = 0.03). The number of patients with an increase ≥50 cells/mm(3) was also greater in the LPV/r arm (7/9 versus 2/10, p = 0.01). This paralleled a decrease in ex vivo apoptosis of naive CD4(+) T cells at 6 months (21.7-11.0% for the LPV/r arm versus 17.3-18.9% for the continuation arm, p = 0.04) and memory cells (21.1-14.1% for LPV/r versus 20.2-17.9% for continuation arm, NSS). Switching patients to an LPV/r-containing regimen improved CD4(+) counts in patients with prior immunologic failure, and this may be due to an effect of LPV/r on apoptosis.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The aim of this open-label, fixed-sequence study was to investigate the potential of Echinacea purpurea, a commonly used botanical supplement, to interact with the boosted protease inhibitor darunavir-ritonavir. Fifteen HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy including darunavir-ritonavir (600/100 mg twice daily) for at least 4 weeks were included. E. purpurea root extract capsules were added to the antiretroviral treatment (500 mg every 6 h) from days 1 to 14. Darunavir concentrations in plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography immediately before and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h after a morning dose of darunavir-ritonavir on days 0 (darunavir-ritonavir) and 14 (darunavir-ritonavir plus echinacea). Individual darunavir pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis and compared between days 0 and 14 with the geometric mean ratio (GMR) and its 90% confidence interval (CI). The median age was 49 (range, 43 to 67) years, and the body mass index was 24.2 (range, 18.7 to 27.5) kg/m(2). Echinacea was well tolerated, and all participants completed the study. The GMR for darunavir coadministered with echinacea relative to that for darunavir alone was 0.84 (90% CI, 0.63-1.12) for the concentration at the end of the dosing interval, 0.90 (90% CI, 0.74-1.10) for the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h, and 0.98 (90% CI, 0.82-1.16) for the maximum concentration. In summary, coadministration of E. purpurea with darunavir-ritonavir was safe and well tolerated. Individual patients did show a decrease in darunavir concentrations, although this did not affect the overall darunavir or ritonavir pharmacokinetics. Although no dose adjustment is required, monitoring darunavir concentrations on an individual basis may give reassurance in this setting.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Echinacea; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Plant Extracts; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

To examine whether the overall results of the CASTLE study pertain to both genders, we analysed the efficacy and safety of atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir in 277 female and 606 male patients in the open-label, multinational trial over 96 weeks. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00272779.. Treatment-naive patients aged ≥ 18 years with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 5000 copies/mL were randomized to receive either atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once daily or lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily, with fixed-dose tenofovir/emtricitabine 300/200 mg once daily.. At week 96, confirmed virological response rates (HIV RNA <50 copies/mL; intent-to-treat analysis) were higher in women and men receiving atazanavir/ritonavir than those receiving lopinavir/ritonavir and lower in women than men in both treatment arms (67% of women and 77% of men on atazanavir/ritonavir and 63% of women and 71% of men on lopinavir/ritonavir). These differences were not observed in the on-treatment analysis. Mean change in CD4 cell count from baseline to week 96 was 265 cells/mm(3) for women and 269 cells/mm(3) for men on atazanavir/ritonavir and 298 cells/mm(3) for women and 286 cells/mm(3) for men on lopinavir/ritonavir. Discontinuation rates were higher in women than men in each treatment arm (22% of women and 15% of men on atazanavir/ritonavir and 29% of women and 18% of men on lopinavir/ritonavir). In women and men, grade 2-4 nausea and diarrhoea were more frequent in the lopinavir/ritonavir group; jaundice and hyperbilirubinaemia occurred more frequently in the atazanavir/ritonavir group.. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir is an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option for women and men with HIV-1 infection. The sex-based differences in response may be due to higher discontinuation rates in women.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Sex Factors

We report darunavir, ritonavir, and etravirine pharmacokinetics in cervicovaginal fluid and blood plasma for women from the Gender, Race and Clinical Experience (GRACE) study. Eight women received darunavir-ritonavir (600/100 mg) twice daily (b.i.d.); two also received etravirine (200 mg) b.i.d. Week 4 paired blood plasma and cervicovaginal fluid samples were collected over 12 h. Darunavir and etravirine cervicovaginal fluid exposures were higher than blood plasma exposures; ritonavir cervicovaginal fluid exposure was lower than blood plasma exposure. The high exposures of darunavir and etravirine in cervicovaginal fluid warrant further evaluation of these drugs for use in HIV-1 prevention.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Given the decline in mortality among HIV-infected patients, it has become increasingly important to consider delayed disease-related and/or anti-HIV therapy-related adverse effects, such as lipodystrophy, when choosing initial therapy. Data from the MONARK trial allowed for comparison of the potential lipodystrophic effects of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy with those of triple therapy with LPV/r plus zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC). This was a randomized, open-label, multinational study that included 136 antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients. A portion of study patients underwent evaluations of limb and trunk fat tissue by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 48 weeks of treatment (and 96 weeks in some patients). Sixty-three patients had paired absorptiometry data at baseline and week 48 (13 patients at week 96). At week 48, median change in limb fat was -63 g on LPV/r monotherapy versus -703 g on LPV/r + ZDV/3TC triple therapy (p=0.014). The proportion of patients with fat loss (>20% loss in limb fat) was significantly lower with LPV/r monotherapy (4.9% versus 27.3%; p=0.018). Changes in trunk fat did not differ significantly between treatments. Nonetheless, limb fat and trunk fat varied in the same direction with both treatments. The decrease in arm lean mass was also significantly less in patients receiving LPV/r monotherapy. Only treatment type emerged as a significant predictor of fat loss (odds ratio, 7.06; 95% CI, 1.11-78.69). These results suggest that LPV/r, and possibly other protease inhibitors, may not be the main contributor to lipoatrophy in HIV-infected patients receiving triple therapy.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Body Fat Distribution; HIV Infections; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Zidovudine

Immune mediated changes in circulating α-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG), a type 1 acute phase protein, which binds protease inhibitors (PI), may alter protein binding and contribute to PI's pharmacokinetic (PK) variability.. In a prospective, 2-phase intensive PK study on antiretroviral naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects treated with a lopinavir-/ritonavir-based regimen, steady state PK sampling and AAG assays were performed at weeks 2 and 16 of treatment.. Median entry age was 43 years (n = 16). Median plasma log(10) HIV-1 RNA, CD4 T-cell counts, and AAG were 5.16 copies/mL, 28 cells/µL, and 143 mg/dL, respectively.The total lopinavir area under the concentration time curve (AUC(12_total)) and maximum concentration (C(max_total)) changed linearly with AAG at mean rates of 16±7 mg*hr/L (slope ± SE); P = .04, and 1.6 ± 0.6 mg/L, P = .02, per 100 mg/dL increase in AAG levels, respectively (n = 15).A 29% drop in AAG levels between week 2 and week 16 was associated with 14% (geometric mean ratio [GMR] = 0.86; 90% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74-0.98) and 13% (GMR = 0.87; 90% CI = 0.79-0.95) reduction in AUC(12_total) and C(max_total), respectively. Neither free lopinavir PK parameters nor antiviral activity (HIV-1 RNA average AUC minus baseline) was affected by change in plasma AAG.. Changes in plasma AAG levels alter total lopinavir concentrations, but not the free lopinavir exposure or antiviral activity. This observation may have implications in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Orosomucoid; Prospective Studies; Protein Binding; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral

The authors compared the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir (LPV) and ritonavir (RTV) between women and men. This 2-step, multicenter, pharmacokinetic study enrolled human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults on lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) capsules (400/100 mg bid) plus 1 or more nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. All participants underwent 12-hour pharmacokinetic sampling. The pharmacokinetic sampling was repeated in participants receiving the LPV/r tablet formulation. Step 1 enrolled 37 women and 40 men; step 2 included 42 participants from step 1 plus 35 new participants (39 women and 38 men). LPV pharmacokinetics in women and men were not significantly different with either formulation. Women had significantly higher median RTV AUC(0-12 h) with both the soft-gel capsule (SGC) and tablet formulations (SGC: 5395 vs 4119 ng·h/mL, P = .026; tablet: 5310 vs 3941 ng·h/mL, P = .012), higher median C(max) (SGC: 802 vs 635 ng/mL, P = .032; tablet: 773 vs 570 ng/mL, P = .006), and lower median CL/F (SGC: 18.54 vs 24.31 L/h, P = .026; tablet: 18.83 vs 25.37 L/h, P = .012). RTV CL/F was slower in women after weight adjustment with both formulations. The pharmacokinetics of LPV in the SGC and tablet formulations are comparable in HIV-infected patients. Women had higher RTV AUC(0-12 h) and lower CL/F with both formulations. The mechanism of the sex difference in RTV CL/F warrants elucidation.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Area Under Curve; Capsules; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Sex Factors; Tablets; Young Adult

Few data are available describing atazanavir exposure during pregnancy, especially when used in combination with tenofovir, whose coadministration with atazanavir results in decreased atazanavir exposure.. International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials 1026 s is an ongoing, prospective, nonblinded study of antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected pregnant women that included 2 cohorts receiving atazanavir/ritonavir 300 mg/100 mg once daily, either with or without tenofovir.. Intensive steady-state 24-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were performed during the third trimester and at 6-12 weeks postpartum. Atazanavir was measured by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (detection limit 0.047 mcg/mL). Pharmacokinetic targets were the estimated 10th percentile atazanavir area under the concentration versus time curve [(AUC): 29.4 mcg · hr · mL-1] in nonpregnant historical controls (mean AUC = 57 mcg · hr · mL-1) and a trough concentration of 0.15 mcg/mL, the concentration target used in therapeutic drug monitoring programs.. Median atazanavir AUC was reduced during the third trimester compared with postpartum for subjects not receiving tenofovir (41.9 vs. 57.9 mcg · hr · mL-1, P = 0.02) and for subjects receiving tenofovir (28.8 vs. 39.6 mcg · hr · mL-1, P = 0.04). During the third trimester, AUC was below the target in 33% (6 of 18) of women not receiving tenofovir and 55% (11 of 20) of women receiving tenofovir. Trough concentration was below the target in 6% (1 of 18) of women not receiving tenofovir and 15% (3 of 20) of women receiving tenofovir. The median (range) ratio of cord blood/maternal atazanavir concentration in 29-paired samples was 0.18 (0-0.45).. Atazanavir exposure is reduced by pregnancy and by concomitant tenofovir use. A dose increase of atazanavir/ritonavir to 400 mg/100 mg may be necessary in pregnant women to ensure atazanavir exposure equivalent to that seen in nonpregnant adults.

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

To investigate the longitudinal pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in HIV-infected infants initiating combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) between 2 weeks and 6 months of age.. A prospective, open-label, multicenter Phase I/II study of LPV/r-based cART at a dose of 300/75 mg/m(2)/dose LPV/r twice daily. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling at 12 months of age and quarterly predose LPV concentrations were collected and safety, virologic and immunologic responses were monitored every 4-12 weeks up to 252 weeks.. Thirty-one HIV-infected infants enrolled into two age cohorts, 14 days to <6 weeks and 6 weeks to <6 months; 29 completed ≥48 weeks of follow-up (median = 123 weeks, range 4-252). At 12 months of age, median LPV area under the curve was comparable for both age cohorts and similar to older children and adults. At week 48, 22 of 31 patients (71%) had HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/ml and 11 of 15 (73%) had <50 copies/ml; 29 of 31 achieved HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/ml on study treatment and 19 (66%) remained durably suppressed until the end of study; viral suppression correlated with a higher percentage of predose time points exceeding the LPV target of 1 μg/ml (92 vs. 71%, P = 0.002).. LPV/r at 300/75 mg/m(2)/dose as part of a cART regimen resulted in viral suppression through 96 weeks of treatment in >65% of young infants. Due to initially low LPV exposure in infants <6 weeks of age, frequent dose adjustment for weight gain is advisable and consideration should be given to studying a higher dose for very young infants.

Topics: Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

In the Phase III ARTEMIS Trial, treatment-naive patients received once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg (n = 343) or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 800/200 mg (total daily dose; n = 346) plus fixed-dose tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine. The primary outcome measure was non-inferiority of DRV/r versus LPV/r (HIV type-1 [HIV-1] RNA<50 copies/ml). Here, a detailed 96-week resistance analysis is presented.. Virological failures (VFs) were defined as patients who had lost (rebounders) or who had never achieved (never suppressed) HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml after week 12. Genotypic and phenotypic determinations were performed on plasma samples with HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/ml. The end point was defined as the last on-treatment visit with available genotype and/or phenotype.. The VF rate was significantly lower in DRV/r (12%, n = 40) versus LPV/r patients (17%, n = 59; P = 0.0437). Among DRV/r patients, 24 rebounded and 16 were never suppressed, whereas among LPV/r patients, 33 rebounded and 26 were never suppressed. Transient HIV-1 RNA increases (≥ 50 copies/ml) occurred in 50% (n = 12) DRV/r and 48% (n = 16) LPV/r rebounders; these viral levels returned to undetectable by end point without any changes to the study regimen. No major (primary) protease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) developed in VFs with an available genotype at baseline and end point, and almost all developing minor PI RAMs were polymorphic. At end point, all VFs with available phenotypes at baseline and end point remained susceptible to all PIs, including study PIs.. The VF rate was lower with DRV/r than LPV/r. The findings of this resistance analysis confirmed the lack of development of major PI RAMs and the preservation of phenotypic susceptibility to all PIs in patients with VF.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Deoxycytidine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; Genetic Association Studies; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Mutation; Organophosphonates; Polymorphism, Genetic; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

Limited data compare once-daily options for initial therapy for HIV-1.. To compare time to virologic failure; first grade-3 or -4 sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality (safety); and change or discontinuation of regimen (tolerability) for atazanavir plus ritonavir with efavirenz-containing initial therapy for HIV-1.. A randomized equivalence trial accrued from September 2005 to November 2007, with median follow-up of 138 weeks. Regimens were assigned by using a central computer, stratified by screening HIV-1 RNA level less than 100 000 copies/mL or 100 000 copies/mL or greater; blinding was known only to the site pharmacist. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00118898). 59 AIDS Clinical Trials Group sites in the United States and Puerto Rico.. Antiretroviral-naive patients.. Open-label atazanavir plus ritonavir or efavirenz, each given with with placebo-controlled abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF)-emtricitabine.. Primary outcomes were time to virologic failure, safety, and tolerability events. Secondary end points included proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA level less than 50 copies/mL, emergence of drug resistance, changes in CD4 cell counts, calculated creatinine clearance, and lipid levels.. 463 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive atazanavir plus ritonavir and 465 were assigned to receive efavirenz, both with abacavir-lamivudine; 322 (70%) and 324 (70%), respectively, completed follow-up. The respective numbers of participants in each group who received tenofovir DF-emtricitabine were 465 and 464; 342 (74%) and 343 (74%) completed follow-up. Primary efficacy was similar in the group that received atazanavir plus ritonavir and and the group that received efavirenz and did not differ according to whether abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir DF-emtricitabine was also given. Hazard ratios for time to virologic failure were 1.13 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.56) and 1.01 (CI, 0.70 to 1.46), respectively, although CIs did not meet prespecified criteria for equivalence. The time to safety (P = 0.048) and tolerability (P < 0.001) events was longer in persons given atazanavir plus ritonavir than in those given efavirenz with abacavir-lamivudine but not with tenofovir DF-emtricitabine.. Neither HLA-B*5701 nor resistance testing was the standard of care when A5202 enrolled patients. The third drugs, atazanavir plus ritonavir and efavirenz, were open-label; the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors were prematurely unblinded in the high viral load stratum; and 32% of patients modified or discontinued treatment with their third drug.. Atazanavir plus ritonavir and efavirenz have similar antiviral activity when used with abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir DF-emtricitabine.. National Institutes of Health.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Viral Load; Young Adult

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Urolithiasis

ODIN (Once-daily Darunavir In treatment-experieNced patients) was a phase III, 48-week, open-label study comparing once-daily vs. twice-daily darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) in treatment-experienced patients with no DRV resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) at screening.. Patients with no DRV RAMs and receiving stable HAART for at least 12 weeks were stratified by HIV-1 RNA (≤ or > 50 000 copies/ml) and randomized to once-daily DRV/r 800/100 mg or twice-daily DRV/r 600/100 mg and an optimized background regimen (≥2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors). Primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority of once-daily vs. twice-daily DRV/r in confirmed virologic response (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml) at week 48.. Five hundred and ninety patients received once-daily (n = 294) or twice-daily (n = 296) DRV/r. Mean baseline HIV-1 RNA was 4.16 log10 copies/ml; median CD4 cell count was 228 cells/μl; and 53.9% had previously used at least one protease inhibitor. At week 48, 72.1% of once-daily and 70.9% of twice-daily patients achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml (intent-to-treat/time-to-loss of virologic response). The difference in response between once-daily and twice-daily arms was 1.2% (95% confidence interval -6.1 to 8.5%; P < 0.001), establishing noninferiority of once-daily DRV/r versus twice-daily DRV/r. Median CD4 cell count increase was 100 (once-daily) and 94 cells/μl (twice-daily). Virologic failure rate was low and similar for both arms; only one patient (once-daily arm) developed primary protease inhibitor mutations. Once-daily DRV/r had a lower incidence of grade 2-4 triglyceride increases (5.2 vs. 11.0%, P < 0.05).. Once-daily DRV/r 800/100 mg was noninferior in virologic response to twice-daily DRV/r 600/100 mg at 48 weeks in treatment-experienced patients with no DRV RAMs, and with a more favorable lipid profile. These findings support use of once-daily DRV/r in this population.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Vicriviroc is a next-generation antiretroviral compound that blocks HIV from entering uninfected cells by binding to the virus's cellular co-receptor chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5). A potent inhibitor of HIV infection of human cells both in vitro and in vivo, vicriviroc is in development for use in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected individuals. These patients often receive antiretroviral therapy regimens that include a ritonavir-enhanced protease inhibitor. Such regimens have a high potential for drug-drug interactions because many of the antiretroviral agents inhibit or induce elements of drug elimination pathways, such as the hepatic cytochromes, which may alter drug concentrations and affect both safety and efficacy. The aim of this set of studies was to determine what, if any, dose adjustments or monitoring would be required to use vicriviroc in regimens containing the most common antiretroviral agents.. Drug-drug interactions between vicriviroc and 11 other antiretroviral compounds were investigated in fixed-sequence or parallel-group clinical trials lasting 12-35 days. Fixed-sequence studies were conducted with the protease inhibitors atazanavir, darunavir, fosamprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir and tipranavir. In these studies vicriviroc was administered with ritonavir for a fixed duration, followed by administration of vicriviroc with ritonavir plus the protease inhibitor. Parallel-group studies conducted with lopinavir, zidovudine/lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate randomized subjects to receive vicriviroc with or without the study drug. All subjects enrolled in the studies were healthy male and female adults.. The log-transformed data for vicriviroc primary pharmacokinetic parameters on appropriate days were statistically analysed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model extracting the effects due to treatment. Steady state was evaluated by an ANOVA model on trough concentrations using day and subject as class variables.. Vicriviroc exposure was not affected by the concurrently administered antiretroviral drugs in any clinically relevant manner, nor did vicriviroc have a clinically relevant effect on the exposure of other drugs. The drug combinations studied were safe and well tolerated, with most adverse events reported as mild to moderate. Aside from the known toxicities of the other antiretroviral drugs, no clinically relevant changes in blood chemistry, haematological parameters, ECGs or vital signs were associated with either vicriviroc or combination treatment.. No dose modification or monitoring of vicriviroc concentrations is necessary when vicriviroc is co-administered with any of the antiretroviral agents reviewed here. The lack of drug-drug interactions suggests that it will be possible to add vicriviroc at the single clinically prescribed dose level to various background regimens that include a boosted protease inhibitor, with all other drugs also prescribed at their standard doses.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Biological Availability; CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Half-Life; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Human Immunodeficiency Virus Proteins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; Young Adult

The side-effects of anti-retroviral drugs are different between Japanese and Caucasian patients. Severe central nerve system (CNS) side-effects to efavirenz and low rate of hypersensitivity against abacavir characterize the Japanese.. The objective of this study was to select a once daily regimen for further non-inferior study comparing the virological efficacy and safety of the first line once daily antiretroviral treatment regimens in the current HIV/AIDS guideline.. The study design was a randomized, open label, multicenter, selection study. One arm was treated with efavirenz and the other with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir. A fixed-dose lamivudine plus abacavir were used in both arms. The primary endpoint was virologic success (viral load less than 50 copies/mL) rate at 48 weeks. Patients were followed-up to 96 weeks with safety as the secondary endpoint. Clinicaltrials.Gov (NCT00280969) and the University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000000243).. A total of 71 participants were enrolled. Virologic success rates in both arms were similar at week 48 [efavirenz arm 28/36 (77.8%); atazanavir arm 27/35 (77.1%)], but were decreased at week 96 to 55.6% in the efavirenz arm and 68.8% in the atazanavir arm (p=0.33). At the 96-week follow-up, 52.8% of the EFV arm and 34.3% of the ATV/r arm reached total cholesterol more than 220 mg/dL and required treatment. None of the patients developed cardiovascular complications in this study by week 96.. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of efavirenz and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir combined with lamivudine plus abacavir at 48 weeks. The evaluation of safety was extended to 96 weeks, which also showed no significant difference in both arms.

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; Alanine Transaminase; Alkynes; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Bilirubin; Cholesterol; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Japan; Lamivudine; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Dyslipidaemic effects of antiretrovirals (ARVs) may contribute to increased cardiovascular risk (CR) in HIV-1-infected patients. The ARTEN (atazanavir/ritonavir on a background of tenofovir and emtricitabine vs. nevirapine on the same background, in naïve HIV-1-infected patients) study compared prospectively ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATZ/r) 300 mg/100 mg once daily (qd) with immediate release nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg twice daily or 400 mg qd, each combined with fixed-dose tenofovir 300 mg/emtricitabine 200 mg qd in 569 ARV-naïve HIV-1-infected patients. Lipid profiles and CR from baseline to week 48 are reported.. Changes from baseline to week 48 in fasting plasma levels of total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), TC:HDL-c ratio, apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and total triglycerides (TG) were determined. The Framingham algorithm was used to estimate CR. Analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT) with last observation carried forward (LOCF) for missing data.. At week 48, NVP treatment resulted in significantly greater mean increases from baseline in TC (24.4 vs. 19.6 mg/dL; P=0.038), HDL-c (9.7 vs. 3.9 mg/dL; P<0.0001), LDL-c (15.0 vs. 10.4 mg/dL; P=0.011) and ApoA1 (0.18 vs. 0.08 g/L; P<0.0001) but not ApoB (0.02 vs. 0.02 g/L) compared with ATZ/r treatment. ATZ/r use was associated with higher mean TG increases (27.80 vs. 0.02 mg/dL; P=0.0001). Significantly greater mean decreases in TC:HDL-c and ApoB/ApoA ratios were observed with NVP vs. ATZ/r (P=0.0001 and P=0.008, respectively). Framingham CR scores were low and comparable between the arms, with only a slight mean increase from baseline to week 48 of 0.70 for NVP and 0.80 for ATZ/r [difference -0.069; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.61 to 0.46; P=0.80].. In ARV-naïve patients with low CR at the outset, NVP showed a potentially less atherogenic lipid profile compared with ATZ/r.

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Deoxycytidine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyslipidemias; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lipids; Male; Nevirapine; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Viral Load

Rifampin coadministration dramatically reduces plasma lopinavir (LPV) concentrations. In healthy volunteers, doubling the dose of a lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) capsule formulation overcame this interaction, but a subsequent study of double doses of the tablet formulation was stopped early owing to hepatotoxicity. However, healthy-volunteer study findings may not apply to HIV-infected adults. We evaluated the steady-state pharmacokinetics of LPV in HIV-infected adults virologically suppressed on an LPV/r regimen who were given rifampin, and the dose of the LPV/r tablet formulation was gradually increased. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of LPV/r were evaluated at baseline, a week after commencing rifampin, a week after the LPV/r dose was increased 1.5 times, and a week after the LPV/r dose was doubled. Twenty-one participants were enrolled. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] predose LPV concentrations (C(0)) were 8.1 (6.2 to 9.8) mg/liter at baseline, 1.7 (0.3 to 3.0) mg/liter after 7 days of rifampin, 5.9 (2.1 to 9.9) mg/liter with 1.5 times the dose of LPV/r, and 10.8 (7.0 to 13.1) mg/liter with double-dose LPV/r. There were no significant differences in the LPV area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)), C(0), C(12), maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), or half-life (t(1/2)) between the baseline and double-dose LPV/r time points. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with two participants developing asymptomatic grade 3/4 transaminitis. Doubling the dose of the tablet formulation of LPV/r overcomes induction by rifampin. Less hepatotoxicity occurred in our cohort of HIV-infected participants than was reported in healthy-volunteer studies.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tablets

Selection of first-line antiretroviral therapy requires consideration of efficacy as well as effects on lipids given the increased concern about cardiovascular risk in HIV-1 patients.. ARTEN is a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial that compares nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg twice daily or 400 mg once daily to atazanavir/ritonavir (ATZ/r) 300 mg/100 mg once daily, each combined with fixed-dose tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg/emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg once daily, in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 patients with CD4(+) T-cell counts <400 (men) and <250 cells/mm(3) (women). The primary end point was plasma HIV RNA<50 copies/ml at two consecutive visits prior to week 48.. A total of 569 patients were randomized and treated. Overall, 66.8% of NVP and 65.3% of ATZ/r patients achieved the primary end point (difference 1.9%, 95% CI -5.9-9.8%). Similar rates of serious adverse events were observed (9.6% on NVP versus 8.8% on ATZ/r), although discontinuations due to adverse events were more frequent with NVP than ATZ/r (13.6% versus 3.6%, respectively). None of the 28 patients virologically failing ATZ/r selected resistance mutations, while they were selected in 29/44 patients virologically failing NVP. NVP induced a significantly greater increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and apolipoprotein A1 from baseline than ATZ/r, whereas triglycerides increased significantly more with ATZ/r than NVP. Mean change from baseline in TC:HDL-c ratio was -0.24 for NVP and 0.13 for ATZ/r (P=0.0001).. NVP demonstrated at week 48 non-inferior antiviral efficacy compared with ATZ/r when given along with TDF/FTC, despite more drug-related discontinuations with NVP than ATZ/r. NVP was associated with a lower atherogenic lipid profile than ATZ/r although resistance mutations were more frequently selected with NVP than ATZ/r.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cardiovascular Diseases; Deoxycytidine; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nevirapine; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

There are limited antiretroviral options for use in the treatment of HIV infection during pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy and appropriate dosing regimen for ritonavir (RTV)-boosted atazanavir in HIV-1-infected pregnant women.. In this nonrandomized, open-label study, HIV-infected pregnant women were dosed with either 300/100 mg (n=20) or 400/100 mg (n=21) atazanavir/RTV once-daily (qd) in combination with zidovudine (300 mg) and lamivudine (150 mg) twice daily in the third trimester. Pharmacokinetic parameters [maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max) ), trough observed plasma concentration 24 hour post dose (C(min) ) and area under concentration-time curve in one dosing interval (AUC(τ) )] were determined and compared with historical values (300/100 mg atazanavir/RTV) for HIV-infected nonpregnant adults (n=23).. At or before delivery, all mothers achieved HIV RNA <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and all infants were HIV DNA negative at 6 months of age. The third trimester AUC(τ) for atazanavir/RTV 300/100 mg was 21% lower than historical data, but the C(min) values were comparable. The C(min) value for atazanavir/RTV 400/100 mg was 39% higher than the C(min) for atazanavir/RTV 300/100 mg in historical controls, but the AUC(τ) values were comparable. Twice as many patients in the 400/100 mg group (62%) had an increase in total bilirubin (>2.5 times the upper limit of normal) as in the 300/100 mg group (30%). Atazanavir (ATV) was well tolerated with no unanticipated adverse events.. In this study, use of atazanavir/RTV 300/100 mg qd produced C(min) comparable to historical data in nonpregnant HIV-infected adults. When used in combination with zidovudine/lamivudine, it suppressed HIV RNA in all mothers and prevented mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 infection. During pregnancy, the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy demonstrated that a dose adjustment is not required for ATV.

Topics: Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Oligopeptides; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Puerto Rico; Pyridines; Ritonavir; South Africa; United States; Viral Load

Long-term effects of abacavir (ABC)-lamivudine (3TC), compared with tenofovir (TDF)-emtricitabine (FTC) with efavirenz (EFV) or atazanavir plus ritonavir (ATV/r), on bone mineral density (BMD) have not been analyzed.. A5224s was a substudy of A5202, in which HIV-infected treatment-naive participants were randomized and blinded to receive ABC-3TC or TDF-FTC with open-label EFV or ATV/r. Primary bone end points included Dual-emission X-ray absorbtiometry (DXA)-measured percent changes in spine and hip BMD at week 96. Primary analyses were intent-to-treat. Statistical tests used the factorial design and included linear regression, 2-sample t, log-rank, and Fisher's exact tests.. Two hundred sixty-nine persons randomized to 4 arms of ABC-3TC or TDF-FTC with EFV or ATV/r. At baseline, 85% were male, and 47% were white non-Hispanic; the median HIV-1 RNA load was 4.6 log(10) copies/mL, the median age was 38 years, the median weight was 76 kg, and the median CD4 cell count was 233 cells/μL. At week 96, the mean percentage changes from baseline in spine and hip BMD for ABC-3TC versus TDF-FTC were -1.3% and -3.3% (P = .004) and -2.6% and -4.0% (P = .024), respectively; and for EFV versus ATV/r were -1.7% and -3.1% (P = .035) and -3.1% and -3.4% (P = .61), respectively. Bone fracture was observed in 5.6% of participants. The probability of bone fractures and time to first fracture were not different across components.. Compared with ABC-3TC, TDF-FTC-treated participants had significantly greater decreases in spine and hip BMD, whereas ATV/r led to more significant losses in spine, but not hip, BMD than EFV. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00118898.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Bone Density; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Deoxycytidine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; Fractures, Bone; HIV Infections; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Osteoporosis; Pyridines; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Viral Load

To describe the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir (ATV) and ritonavir-boosted ATV (ATV/r) in children aged 91 days to 21 years.. A phase I/II, open-label, multicenter study of once-daily ATV and ATV/r as part of combination antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected treatment-experienced and treatment-naive children.. Sites in the United States and South Africa.. One hundred and ninety-five children enrolled; 172 had evaluable ATV pharmacokinetics on day 7.. Children were entered in age, dose, and formulation (powder or capsule) cohorts. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling occurred 7 days after starting ATV. ATV doses were increased or decreased if the 24-h area under the concentration time curves (AUC0-24hr) were less than 30 or more than 90 μg × h/ml, respectively.. Cohorts satisfied protocol-defined pharmacokinetic criteria if the median ATV AUC0-24hr was 60 μg × h/ml or less, and AUC0-24hr and ATV concentrations 24-h postdose (C24) were more than 30 μg × h/ml and at least 60 ng/ml, respectively, in at least 80% of the children, with no individual AUC0-24hr less than 15 μg × h/ml.. Unboosted ATV capsules satisfied pharmacokinetic criteria at a dose of 520 mg/m for those aged more than 2 to 13 years or less and 620 mg/m for those aged more than 13 to 21 years or less. ATV/r capsules satisfied criteria at a dose of 205 mg/m for those aged more than 2 to 21 years or less. ATV/r powder satisfied criteria at a dose of 310 mg/m for those aged more than 2 to 13 years or less, but pharmacokinetics in those aged 2 years or less were highly variable.. Body surface area-determined doses of ATV capsules and of ATV/r powder and capsules provide ATV exposures in children of more than 2 years that approximate concentrations in adults receiving ATV/r.

Topics: Adolescent; Atazanavir Sulfate; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Male; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; South Africa; Treatment Outcome; United States; Young Adult

Gender-based differences in lipids have been noted in antiretroviral clinical trials. We present the metabolic and anthropometric data from the GRACE (Gender, Race And Clinical Experience) study by gender. Treatment-experienced adults received darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 600/100 mg twice daily, plus a background regimen, over 48 weeks. Fasting blood samples were obtained for lipid, glucose, and insulin measurements at baseline and at weeks 24 and 48/early discontinuation. Anthropometric measurements were taken at baseline and at weeks 12, 24, and 48/discontinuation. The Assessment of Body Change and Distress questionnaire was administered at baseline and regular intervals. Descriptive statistics as well as comparisons using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test are reported. Four hundred twenty-nine patients (women, n=287; men, n=142) enrolled in GRACE; 94 women (32.8%) and 33 men (23.2%) discontinued the trial. Median changes in triglycerides from baseline to week 48 were higher in men (25 mg/dL versus 8 mg/dL; p=0.006); the mean change in triglycerides was higher in men than in women in all racial subgroups. Other lipid and glucose level changes were similar between genders. Anthropometric parameters increased for both genders, with larger increases in women. Patients' perceptions of body changes concurred with physical measurements. The proportion of women who were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their bodies increased from 45.2% to 57.8% from baseline to week 48 (p=0.005), while the proportion of men who were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their bodies increased from 56.3% to 61.5% from baseline to week 48 (p=0.317). DRV/r-based therapy was associated with small to moderate changes in metabolic parameters, and few between-gender differences were observed. Levels of self-reported, body-related distress improved for women and men over 48 weeks.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Image; Body Size; Darunavir; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Insulin; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Sex Factors; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

In virologically suppressed patients, switching to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy could avoid resistance and adverse events from continuing nucleoside analogues.. Two hundred and fifty-six patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL on current antiretrovirals were switched to darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily, either as monotherapy (n = 127) or with two nucleoside analogues (n = 129). Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels at least 50 copies/mL by week 96, or discontinuation of study drugs. The trial had 80% power to show non-inferiority (δ = -12%) at week 48. Results Patients were 81% male, 91% Caucasian, and had a median baseline CD4 count of 575 cells/mm(3). There were more patients with hepatitis C co-infection at baseline in the monotherapy arm (18%) compared with the triple therapy arm (12%). In the efficacy analysis, HIV RNA <50 copies/mL by week 96 (per protocol, time to loss of virological response, switch equals failure) was 78% versus 82% in the monotherapy and triple therapy arms [difference -4.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -14.3% to +5.8%]; in a switch included analysis, HIV RNA <50 copies/mL was 93% versus 92% (difference +1.6%, 95% CI -5.0% to +8.1%). The percentage of patients with HIV RNA <5 copies/mL (optical density from the sample equal to the negative control) remained constant over time in both treatment arms. Conclusions In the week 96 analysis of the MONotherapy in Europe with TMC114 (MONET) trial, switching to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy showed non-inferior efficacy to darunavir/ritonavir plus two nucleoside analogues in the switch included and observed failure analyses, but not in the main switch equals failure analysis.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; Europe; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Nucleosides; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Failure

HIV-infected children are treated with tenofovir in combination with other, potentially interacting, antiretroviral agents. We report the pharmacokinetic parameters of tenofovir in combination with efavirenz, darunavir-ritonavir, or atazanavir-ritonavir in HIV-infected children. HIV-infected patients 8 to 18 years of age receiving a tenofovir (300 mg)-based regimen containing efavirenz (300 or 600 mg) once daily (group 1), darunavir (300 or 600 mg)-ritonavir (100 mg) twice daily (group 2), or atazanavir (150 to 400 mg)-ritonavir (100 mg) once daily (group 3) were enrolled. Plasma samples were collected over a 24-h time interval. The 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) of the geometric means for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the minimum concentration of drug in serum (C(min)) of each antiretroviral were computed and checked for overlap with intervals bracketing published values obtained in adult or pediatric studies demonstrating safety and/or efficacy. Group 1 efavirenz plasma concentrations were observed to be higher in patients receiving fixed-dose combination tablets compared with subjects receiving the individual formulation. In group 2, tenofovir and darunavir exposure was observed to be lower than expected. In group 3, tenofovir and atazanavir administered concomitantly produced exposures similar to those published for adult patients. The 90% CI of AUC and C(min) for tenofovir overlapped the target range for all combinations. Informal comparisons of treatment groups did not indicate any advantage to any combination with respect to tenofovir exposure. Further study of exposures achieved with antiretrovirals administered in combination is warranted.

Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Child; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

In virologically suppressed patients, switching to darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) monotherapy maintains HIV RNA suppression, and could also lower treatment costs.. The purpose of this analysis was to calculate the potential cost savings from the use of DRV/r monotherapy in the UK.. In the MONET trial, 256 patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL on current highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for over 24 weeks (non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor [NNRTI] based [43%] or protease inhibitor [PI] based [57%]), switched to DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily, either as monotherapy (n = 127) or with two NRTIs (n = 129). The UK costs per patient with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 48 (responders) were calculated using a 'switch included' analysis to account for additional antiretrovirals taken after initial treatment failure. By this analysis, efficacy was 93.5% versus 95.1% in the DRV/r monotherapy and triple therapy arms, respectively. British National Formulary 2009 values were used.. Before the trial, the mean annual cost of antiretrovirals was £6906 for patients receiving NNRTI-based HAART, and £8348 for patients receiving PI-based HAART. During the MONET trial, the mean annual per-patient cost of antiretrovirals was £8642 in the triple therapy arm, of which 55% was from NRTIs and 45% from PIs. The mean per-patient cost in the monotherapy arm was £4126, a saving of 52% versus triple therapy. The mean cost per responder was £9085 in the triple therapy arm versus £4413 in the DRV/r monotherapy arm.. Based on the MONET results, the lower cost of DRV/r monotherapy versus triple therapy in the UK would allow more patients to be treated for fixed budgets, while maintaining HIV RNA suppression at < 50 copies/mL. If all patients meeting the inclusion criteria of the MONET trial in the UK were switched to DRV/r monotherapy, there is the potential to save up to £60 million in antiretroviral drug costs from the UK NHS budget.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antiviral Agents; Costs and Cost Analysis; Female; Health Care Costs; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; United Kingdom

Abstract Our objective was to evaluate the liver toxicity of antiretroviral regimens including fosamprenavir plus ritonavir (FPV/r) 1400/100 mg once daily (QD) in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients. This was a prospective cohort study that included 117 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who started FPV/r 1400/100 mg QD-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) and who neither had received a previous antiretroviral regimen containing FPV nor had a past history of virologic failure while receiving protease inhibitors (PI). The primary end point of the study was the occurrence of grade 3-4 liver enzymes elevations (LEE) within 1 year after starting FPV/r QD. Factors potentially associated with grade 3-4 LEE, including baseline liver fibrosis, were analyzed. Eleven (9%) patients had a grade 3-4 LEE during the follow-up, resulting in an incidence of severe liver toxicity of 9% (95% confidence interval 4.1-14.6%). None of these cases led to FPV/r discontinuation. Baseline liver fibrosis could be assessed in 97 (83%) patients. Six of 71 patients (8%) with significant fibrosis had a grade 3-4 LEE versus 2 of 26 (8%) without significant fibrosis (p=1.0). Twenty (21%) patients had cirrhosis at baseline. There were no cases of LEE among cirrhotics. In conclusion, the incidence of severe liver toxicity after 1 year of therapy with FPV/r QD-based ART in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is similar to what has been reported with other boosted PIs. In addition, the presence of significant fibrosis or cirrhosis was not associated with the emergence of liver toxicity. Thus, ART regimens containing FPV/r QD may be considered safe in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, including those with cirrhosis.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-drug resistance mutations (DRM) are increasingly reported in Africans failing their first antiretroviral regimen. The Phidisa II trial randomized treatment-naive participants to lopinavir/ritonavir or efavirenz with stavudine + lamivudine or zidovudine + didanosine. We report the prevalence of DRM in subjects who achieved HIV RNA <400 copies per milliliter at 6 months, but subsequently had 2 consecutive HIV RNA >1000 copies per milliliter. Sixty-eight participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-DRM were found in 17 of 36 (47.2%) efavirenz recipients, and M184V/I mutation in 14 of 40 (35.0%) lamivudine recipients. No protease inhibitor mutation was identified in 38 lopinavir/ritonavir recipients. This is one of the first studies in Africa confirming the paucity of protease inhibitor-associated DRM despite virologic failure.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Mutation; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; South Africa; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

Treatment of HIV/tuberculosis (TB) co-infected patients is complex due to drug-drug interactions for these chronic diseases. This study evaluates an intermittent dosing regimen for rifabutin when it is co-administered with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir.. A randomized, multiple-dose, parallel-group study was conducted in healthy subjects and these subjects received a daily dose of rifabutin 150 mg (n = 15, reference group) or a twice weekly dose with atazanavir 300 mg/ritonavir 100 mg once daily (n = 18, test group). Serial blood samples were collected at steady-state for pharmacokinetic analysis. Modelling and simulation techniques were utilized, integrating data across several healthy subject studies. This study is known as Study AI424-360 and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00646776.. The pharmacokinetic parameters (C(max), AUC(24avg) and C(min)) for rifabutin (149%, 48% and 40% increase, respectively) and 25-O-desacteyl rifabutin (6.77-, 9.90- and 10.45-fold increases, respectively) were both increased when rifabutin was co-administered with atazanavir/ritonavir than rifabutin 150 mg once daily alone. The study was stopped because subjects experienced more severe declines in neutrophil counts when rifabutin was given with atazanavir/ritonavir than alone. A post-hoc simulation analysis showed that when rifabutin 150 mg was given three times weekly with atazanavir/ritonavir, the average daily exposure of rifabutin was comparable to rifabutin 300 mg once daily, a dose necessary for reducing rifamycin resistance in HIV/TB co-infected patients.. The benefits to HIV/TB co-infected patients receiving rifabutin 150 mg three times weekly or every other day may outweigh the risks of neutropenia observed here in non-HIV-infected subjects, provided that patients on combination therapy will be closely monitored for safety and tolerability.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Area Under Curve; Atazanavir Sulfate; Biotransformation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Leukocyte Count; Male; Middle Aged; Neutrophils; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis; Young Adult

Current guidelines for HIV therapy recommend initiating treatment at a CD4 cell count of 500 cells/mm(3). However, a large proportion of patients with HIV infection begin antiretroviral treatment at a more advanced stage. In the CASTLE study, patients with the most advanced HIV disease (CD4 cell count <50 cells/mm(3)) showed that 78% (45/58) vs. 58% (28/48) of the patients achieved HIV RNA <50 copies/mL in the intent-to-treat analysis at week 96 for atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir, respectively. This current sub-analysis of the CASTLE study describes demographics, virologic failure, discontinuations, safety, tolerability, immunologic response, and clinical outcomes for the following baseline strata: CD4 cell count (cells/mm(3)) <50, 50 to <100, 100 to <200, and ≥200 and HIV RNA (copies/mL) <100,000, 100,000 to <500,000, and ≥500,000. In the lowest CD4 cell count stratum (<50 cells/mm(3)), the proportion of discontinuations was 2-fold greater for the lopinavir/ritonavir arm (33%) than for the atazanavir/ritonavir arm (16%) with a similar rate of virologic failure between the two groups. Also in this CD4 cell count stratum, grades 2-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 25% in the atazanavir/ritonavir group and in 43% of lopinavir/ritonavir group, and the rate was also higher than in the higher CD4 cell count strata within the lopinavir/ritonavir treatment group (range: 29-34%). Grades 2-4 treatment-related diarrhea and nausea occurred in more patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir than atazanavir/ritonavir in all strata. The atazanavir/ritonavir group had more grades 2-4 treatment-related jaundice than in the lopinavir/ritonavir group. These results highlight the importance of tolerability of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the patients at greatest risk of morbidity and mortality when using regimens of similar potency.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Deoxycytidine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The clinical outcomes of short interruptions of PI-based ART regimens remains undefined.. A 2-arm non-inferiority trial was conducted on 53 HIV-1 infected South African participants with viral load <50 copies/ml and CD4 T cell count >450 cells/µl on stavudine (or zidovudine), lamivudine and lopinavir/ritonavir. Subjects were randomized to a) sequential 2, 4 and 8-week ART interruptions or b) continuous ART (cART). Primary analysis was based on the proportion of CD4 count >350 cells(c)/ml over 72 weeks. Adherence, HIV-1 drug resistance, and CD4 count rise over time were analyzed as secondary endpoints.. The proportions of CD4 counts >350 cells/µl were 82.12% for the intermittent arm and 93.73 for the cART arm; the difference of 11.95% was above the defined 10% threshold for non-inferiority (upper limit of 97.5% CI, 24.1%; 2-sided CI: -0.16, 23.1). No clinically significant differences in opportunistic infections, adverse events, adherence or viral resistance were noted; after randomization, long-term CD4 rise was observed only in the cART arm.. We are unable to conclude that short PI-based ART interruptions are non-inferior to cART in retention of immune reconstitution; however, short interruptions did not lead to a greater rate of resistance mutations or adverse events than cART suggesting that this regimen may be more forgiving than NNRTIs if interruptions in therapy occur.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00100646.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; HIV Infections; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Protease Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Stavudine; Zidovudine

Lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) is a protease inhibitor that is used twice daily (BID) in the treatment of HIV infection in children. In the context of a single-center observational study, a switch to a once-a-day (QD) LPV/r regimen was proposed for considerations of convenience and to support adherence. The aims of this study were to compare the pharmacokinetics, viral loads, percentages of CD4(+) T cells, and lipid profiles after switching from a twice-daily to a once-daily regimen of LPV/r in experienced children. For this purpose, LPV concentrations, viral loads, CD4(+) T cells, and biochemistry data were measured in routine therapeutic drug monitoring procedures in 45 children and adolescents. Thirty-six children were switched to the QD regimen. Nine children on the BID or QD regimen were added for pharmacokinetic-study purposes only. The QD trough concentrations (C(trough)) of lopinavir in plasma were significantly lower than those observed with the BID regimen (P < 0.0001), but the 24-h exposure levels were not significantly lower with the QD than with the BID regimen (P = 0.09). Among 34 evaluable patients who switched from the BID to the QD regimen, the virological efficacy of LPV/r appeared to differ (P < 0.001), with 74% and 57% of viral loads, respectively, being <50 copies/ml (mean follow-up times, 33 and 20 months). Among 22 patients with stable virological control before the switch, 12 experienced either failure or blip (one observation of detectable viral load between two observations of undetectable viral load) after the switch. The change from the BID to the QD regimen did not result in significant differences in CD4(+) T cell percentages or total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride levels. The switch from the BID to the QD LPV/r regimen led to equivalent exposure and lower C(trough) values and resulted in lower levels of virological control in these antiretroviral-experienced children.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Significant pharmacokinetic interactions can result between acid-suppressing agents and some protease inhibitors (PIs) in the management of HIV infection. In healthy subjects, famotidine, an H(2)-receptor antagonist, reduces exposures of atazanavir by 4-28% at doses of 20-40 mg twice daily. This study evaluated the effect of famotidine 20-40 mg twice daily on the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once daily with and without tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg in HIV-infected patients (n=40; 87.5% male; mean age 42, range 26-63 years; 55% white). Coadministration of famotidine 40 mg and atazanavir/ritonavir to HIV-infected patients reduced exposures of atazanavir by approximately 20%. This is comparable to reductions seen in HIV-uninfected subjects. Coadministration of famotidine 20 mg had less impact on atazanavir exposures, with no reduction of atazanavir geometric mean plasma concentration at 24 h postdose (C(min)). In the presence of TDF, administration of famotidine 20-40 mg twice daily 2 h after and 10 h before atazanavir/ritonavir reduced exposures of atazanavir by 19-25%. However, all individual atazanavir C(min) values remained at least five-fold above the population mean protein-binding adjusted 90% maximum effect (EC(90)) against wild-type HIV (14 ng/mL). No viral load rebound was observed at end of study. The results confirmed that coadministration of an H(2)-receptor antagonist with atazanavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected patients resulted in similar magnitude of reductions in atazanavir exposures as in healthy subjects. This supports the current dose recommendations for coadministration of an H(2)-receptor antagonist with atazanavir/ritonavir.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Famotidine; Female; Histamine H2 Antagonists; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Viral Load

To assess efficacy and safety of cobicistat versus ritonavir as pharmacoenhancers for atazanavir when administered with emtricitabine/tenofovir df as initial treatment for HIV-1 infection.. Randomized, partially placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study.. Antiretroviral treatment-naive adults, screening HIV-1 RNA of at least 5000 copies/ml and CD4 cell count more than 50 cells/μl.. Randomized 2 : 1 (stratified by HIV RNA ≤ or >100,000 copies/ml) to receive placebo-blinded once-daily cobicistat 150 mg or ritonavir 100 mg with open-label atazanavir and fixed-dose emtricitabine/tenofovir df.. Efficacy and safety at weeks 24 and 48.. Eighty-four percent of ATV/co participants and 86% of ATV/r participants suppressed HIV-1 RNA (<50 copies/ ml) at week 24, and 82 and 86% at week 48, respectively, and mean CD4 cell count increased 203 and 199 cells/μl at week 24 and 208 and 177 cells/μl at week 48, respectively. Study treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 4% ATV/co and in 3% ATV/r participants through 48 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 36% ATV/co and 48% ATV/r participants; hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 96 and 100%, and ocular icterus or jaundice occurred in 14 and 17%, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (Cockcroft-Gault, ml/min) decrease occurred in both treatment groups and was evident at week 2 (ATV/co -9, ATV/r -4), reached a nadir by week 24 (-15, -14, respectively), and did not progress further through week 48 (-13, -14).. Using cobicistat and ritonavir as pharmacoenhancers for atazanavir and administered with emtricitabine/tenofovir df achieved comparable rates of virologic suppression and CD4 cell count increase with satisfactory safety profiles.

Topics: Adenine; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cobicistat; Deoxycytidine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

To explore darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) plus raltegravir (RAL) combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients.. Phase IIb, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study.. One hundred and twelve antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients received DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily and RAL 400 mg twice daily. Primary endpoint was virologic failure by week 24. Virologic failure was defined as confirmed viral load of 1000 copies/ml or more at week 12, or an increase of more than 0.5 log(10) copies/ml in viral load from week 4 to 12, or a confirmed viral load of more than 50 copies/ml at or after week 24. Protease and integrase genes were sequenced in patients experiencing virologic failure.. Virologic failure rate was 16% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10-24] by week 24 and 26% (95% CI 19-36) by week 48 in an intent-to-treat analysis. Viral load at virologic failure was 51-200 copies/ml in 17/28 failures. Adjusting for age and sex, virologic failure was associated with baseline viral load of more than 100,000 copies/ml [hazard ratio 3.76, 95% CI (1.52-9.31), P = 0.004] and lower CD4 cell count [0.77 per 100 cells/μl increase (95% CI 0.61-0.98), P = 0.037]. When trough RAL concentrations were included as a time-varying covariate in the analysis, virologic failure remained associated with baseline viral load more than 100,000 copies/ml [hazard ratio = 4.67 (95% CI 1.93-11.25), P < 0.001], whereas RAL level below detection limit in plasma at one or more previous visits was associated with increased hazard [hazard ratio = 3.42 (95% CI 1.41-8.26), P = 0.006]. All five participants with integrase mutations during virologic failure had baseline viral load more than 100,000 copies/ml.. DRV/r plus RAL was effective and well tolerated in most patients, but virologic failure and integrase resistance were common, particularly in patients with baseline viral load more than 100,000 copies/ml.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

Lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) is first-line therapy for pediatric HIV infection. In clinical practice, Kaletra tablets are occasionally crushed for pediatric administration. This study compared lopinavir/ritonavir exposure between whole and crushed tablets in HIV-infected children.. This was a randomized, open-label, cross-over study of pediatric patients taking lopinavir/ritonavir as part of their antiretroviral regimen. Each subject had 2 separate (within 30 days) steady-state 12-hour pharmacokinetic (PK) studies with crushed and whole 200/50 mg lopinavir/ritonavir tablets.. PK blood samples were drawn at 0 (predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose. Lopinavir and ritonavir plasma concentrations measured by high-performance liquid chromatography were used to calculate non-compartmental area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) and clearance. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared PK values between crushed and whole tablets.. Twelve children, median age of 13 years (10-16 years), took 550/138 mg·m(-2) per day lopinavir/ritonavir divided every 12 hours. The median lopinavir AUC after crushed and whole tablets were 92 mg·hr·L(-1) and 144 mg·hr·L(-1), respectively, with an AUC ratio of 0.55 (P = 0.003). Median ritonavir AUC of crushed and whole tablets were 7 mg·hr·L(-1) and 13.3 mg·hr·L(-1), respectively, with an AUC ratio of 0.53 (P = 0.006).. Administration of crushed 200/50 mg lopinavir/ritonavir tablets to children significantly reduced lopinavir and ritonavir exposure with a decrease in AUC by 45% and 47%, respectively. The administration of crushed tablets would require higher doses and therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure adequate lopinavir exposure in patients requiring this practice. The use of crushed lopinavir/ritonavir tablets should be avoided, if possible.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Ritonavir; Tablets; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and safety of an individualized treatment-simplification strategy consisting of switching from a highly-active anti-retroviral treatment (HAART) with a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) and 2 nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy, with intensification by 2 NRTIs if necessary, to that of continuing their HAART.. This is a one-year, randomized, open-label, multi-center study in virologically-suppressed HIV-1-infected adults on their first PI/r-containing treatment, randomized to either LPV/r-monotherapy or continue their current treatment. Treatment efficacy was determined by plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL), time-to-virologic rebound, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and CD4+T-cell-count changes. Safety was assessed with the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AE).. Forty-one patients were randomized to LPV/r and 39 to continue their HAART. No statistically-significant differences between the two study groups in demographics and baseline characteristics were observed. At day-360, 71(39:LPV/r;32:HAART) patients completed treatment, while 9(2:LPV/r;7:HAART) discontinued. In a Last Observation Carried Forward Intent-to-Treat analysis, 40(98%) patients on LPV/r and 37(95%) on HAART had VL<200 copies/mL (P = 0.61). Time-to-virologic rebound, changes in PROs, CD4+ T-cell-count and VL from baseline, also exhibited no statistically-significant between-group differences. Most frequent AEs were diarrhea (19%), headache (18%) and influenza (16%). Four (10%) patients on LPV/r were intensified with 2 NRTIs, all regaining virologic control. Eight serious AEs were reported by 5(2:LPV/r;3:HAART) patients.. At day-360, virologic efficacy and safety of LPV/r appears comparable to that of a PI+2NRTIs HAART. These results suggest that our individualized, simplified maintenance strategy with LPV/r-monotherapy and protocol-mandated NRTI re-introduction upon viral rebound, in virologically-suppressed patients merits further prospective long-term evaluation.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00159224.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Precision Medicine; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Our objective was to determine virological and clinical characteristics associated with virological failure in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients switching to darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) monotherapy.. The main outcome was virologic rebound, defined as 2 consecutive measurements of HIV-1 plasma RNA viral load (VL) >50 copies/mL. A logistic model was used to investigate which variables were predictive of a virologic rebound at weeks 48 (W48) and 96 (W96).. Receiving DRV/r monotherapy was associated with virologic rebound at W48 (P = .016) and W96 (P = .002), comparable to triple therapy. In the DRV/r monotherapy group, at W48, having a VL >50 copies/mL at day 0 and even a baseline ultrasensitive VL >1 copy/mL were predictive factors to virologic rebound (P = .042 and P = .025, respectively). At W96, shorter time of prior antiretrovial therapy (ART) exposure (odds ratio [OR] = 2.93 per 5 years decrease; P = .006), higher HIV-1 DNA at day 0 (OR = 2.66 per 1 log(10) copies/10(6) cells increase; P = .04) and adherence <100% (OR = 3.84 vs 100%; P = .02) were associated with an increased risk of rebound.. Factors associated with virological failure in patients receiving DRV/r monotherapy were having an initial blip, shorter time of antiretroviral treatment before monotherapy, and an adherence <100% during monotherapy. The importance of prior duration exposure to ART was in agreement with the impact of HIV-1 blood reservoir and VL level at baseline.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

To investigate the pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir, in HIV-infected subjects, in both plasma and at the intracellular (IC) site of action.. HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy received raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 21 days (period 1); darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily was added for 14 days (period 2), and patients were randomized to continue raltegravir twice daily (group 1) or to switch to 800 mg once daily (group 2), then they all stopped raltegravir intake and continued darunavir/ritonavir once daily for 14 days (period 3). Drug concentrations in plasma and cells (peripheral blood mononuclear cell) were measured, and differences in geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (CI) between period 2 versus period 3 and period 2 versus period 1 were assessed.. Twenty-four patients completed the study. Group 1 GMR (90% CI) of darunavir area under the curve (AUC) with and without raltegravir was 1.24 (1.13 to 1.45) for plasma and 1.24 (1.07 to 1.73) for cells and for group 2 was 1.14 (1.07 to 1.24) and 1.03 (0.94 to 1.16). GMR (90% CI) of raltegravir AUC without and with darunavir/ritonavir (plasma and cells) for group 1 was 0.90 (0.73 to 1.44) and 1.02 (0.81 to 1.67) and for group 2 was 1.21 (1.03 to 1.77) and 1.27 (1.07 to 1.94). Geometric mean IC to plasma AUC ratios were 5.3 and 4.9 for darunavir in groups 1 and 2 when darunavir/ritonavir was given alone and 4.9 and 5.6 for raltegravir when given alone. These ratios were not altered by the coadministered drug.. No remarkable interactions between darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir in plasma or cells were seen. Raltegravir IC concentrations are higher than previously reported; the difference being due to modified cell isolation procedures that reduced drug loss caused by washing.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Darunavir; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

To evaluate the effects of sex and initial antiretroviral regimen on decay of HIV-RNA and virologic outcome.. We conducted a viral dynamics substudy of A5142, a trial comparing lopinavir (LPV)/ritonavir with efavirenz (LPV/EFV) versus LPV and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) (LPV) versus EFV and two NRTI (EFV) in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive individuals. HIV-RNA was measured at days 2, 10, and 14 in the substudy and at weeks 1, 4, and 8 in A5142 participants. Two-phase viral decay was estimated in the substudy with biexponential mixed-effects modeling and compared using Wilcoxon tests. Week 1 HIV-RNA change was assessed as a predictor of virologic failure (HIV-RNA above 50 or 200  copies/ml) at weeks 24-96 using logistic regression.. Sixty-eight individuals were enrolled in the substudy (median HIV-RNA 4.9 log(10)  copies/ml). Median rates of phase 1 viral decay by treatment were 0.61(EFV/LPV), 0.53(LPV), and 0.63(EFV) per day. Phase 1 decay was significantly faster for EFV than LPV (P = 0.023); other comparisons were not significant (P > 0.11). Viral decay did not differ by sex (P = 0.10). Week 1 HIV-RNA change, calculated in 571 participants of A5142, was greater for the EFV (median -1.47 log(10)  copies/ml) than either the LPV/EFV or LPV groups (-1.21 and -1.16 log(10 ) copies/ml, respectively; P < 0.001). Week 1 HIV-RNA change was associated with virologic failure above 50  copies/ ml at weeks 24 and 48 (P < 0.018), but not above 200  copies/ml at these time points or for any value at week 96.. Phase 1 decay was faster for EFV than LPV or LPV/EFV. Week 1 HIV-RNA change predicted virologic outcome up to week 48, but not at week 96.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sex Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The objective of this analysis was to compare three methods of handling HIV-RNA data below the limit of quantification (LOQ) when describing the time-course of antiretroviral drug response using a drug-disease model. Treatment naïve Scandinavian HIV-positive patients (n = 242) were randomized to one of three study arms. Two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors were administrated in combination with 400/100 mg lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily, 300/100 mg atazanavir/ritonavir once a day or 600 mg efavirenz once a day. The viral response was monitored at screening, baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 24, 48, 96, 120, and 144 weeks after study initiation. Data up to 400 days was fitted using a viral dynamics non-linear mixed effects drug-disease model in NONMEM. HIV-RNA data below LOQ of 50 copies/ml plasma (39%) was omitted, replaced by LOQ/2 or included in the analysis using a likelihood-based method (M3 method). Including data below LOQ using the M3 method substantially improved the model fit. The drug response parameter expressing the fractional inhibition of viral replication was on average (95% CI) estimated to 0.787 (0.721-0.864) for lopinavir and atazanavir treatment arms and 0.868 (0.796-0.923) for the efavirenz containing regimen. At 400 days after treatment initiation 90% (76-100) of the lopinavir and atazanavir treated patients were predicted to have undetectable viral levels and 96% (89-100%) for the efavirenz containing treatment. Including viral data below the LOQ rather than omitting or replacing data provides advantages such as better model predictions and less biased parameter estimates which are of importance when quantifying antiretroviral drug response.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Limit of Detection; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nonlinear Dynamics; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

We report data from NEWART, a randomised phase 4 clinical trial comparing virologic efficacy and safety of nevirapine (NVP) vs. ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) on a background of tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) in HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve patients. This study enrolled patients according to CD4-based initiation criteria for NVP (<250 cells/mm(3) for women and <400 cells/mm(3) for men), to reduce the likelihood of symptomatic hepatic events. NEWART was designed to support and confirm results from ARTEN, an international trial with similar design and study endpoints.. A total of 152 patients were randomised 1 : 1 to open-label NVP 200 mg twice daily or ATV/r (300/100 mg) once daily, plus once daily TDF/FTC (300/200 mg). All participants met CD4(+) guidelines at entry. The primary endpoint for non-inferiority was virologic response prior to and at week 48 (confirmed HIV plasma viral load <50 copies/ml, without rebound or change in ARVs). Safety data, including plasma lipids, were recorded throughout the study.. The primary endpoint was achieved in 46/75 (61.3%) and 50/77 (64.9%) of patients taking NVP and ATV/r, respectively. Frequency of adverse events (AEs) was similar between arms, with 88.0% of NVP-treated patients and 94.8% of ATV/r-treated patients experiencing at least one AE. Nine patients (12%) in each arm experienced an AE that led to discontinuation. At week 48, a significantly greater increase was seen in mean plasma HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) in the NVP arm (9.6 mg/dl) vs. the ATV/r arm (3.5 mg/dl); p = 0.016. Also, total cholesterol (TC):HDL-C ratio on-treatment was -0.38 and -0.02 for the NVP and ATV/r arms, respectively (p = 0.038).. Efficacy results were consistent with the ARTEN study demonstrating that NVP was non-inferior to ATV/r when taken in combination with TDF/FTC. Rates of AEs were similar between the two arms, whereas HDL-C increased and TC:HDL-C decreased significantly more in patients taking NVP than ATV/r.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Deoxycytidine; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Middle Aged; Nevirapine; Oligopeptides; Organophosphorus Compounds; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

Vicriviroc is a CCR5 antagonist in clinical development for the treatment of HIV-1. Two phase I studies were conducted to assess the safety of vicriviroc. One study characterized the drug's potential to prolong the QT/corrected QT (QTc) interval and to induce arrhythmia. In this partially blind, parallel-group study, 200 healthy subjects aged 18 to 50 years were randomized in equal groups to the following regimens: (i) placebo for 9 days and a single dose of moxifloxacin at 400 mg on day 10, (ii) placebo, (iii) vicriviroc-ritonavir (30 and 100 mg), (iv) vicriviroc-ritonavir (150 and 100 mg), and (v) ritonavir (100 mg). The second study characterized the effects of a range of vicriviroc doses on the central nervous system (CNS). In this third-party-blind, parallel-group study, 30 healthy subjects aged 18 to 48 years were randomized to receive a single dose of either vicriviroc at 200, 250, or 300 mg or placebo, followed by multiple (seven) once-daily doses of either vicriviroc at 150, 200, or 250 mg or placebo, respectively. In the first study, vicriviroc produced no clinically meaningful effect on the QT/QTc interval when administered at a supratherapeutic or therapeutic dose concurrently with ritonavir. In the second study, vicriviroc produced no observable seizure activity, nor was it held to be associated with any clinically relevant changes in brain waveforms in the final consensus of reviewers. These findings showed that vicriviroc produced no clinically relevant QTc prolongation cardiac or epileptogenic effects in healthy individuals at exposures as high as five times those expected for HIV-infected patients receiving therapeutic doses of vicriviroc in a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-containing regimen.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; Central Nervous System; Electrocardiography; Electroencephalography; Female; Heart; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; Young Adult

The toxicities, cost and complexity of triple combinations warrant the search for other treatment options, such as boosted protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy. MONotherapy AntiRetroviral Kaletra (MONARK) is the first randomized trial comparing lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy to triple combination therapy with zidovudine/lamivudine and lopinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-naïve patients.. A total of 136 antiretroviral-naïve patients, with a CD4 cell count above 100 cells/microL and a plasma HIV RNA below 100,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL, were randomized and dosed with either lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (n = 83) or lopinavir/ritonavir + zidovudine/lamivudine (n = 53). We focus here on patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm followed to week 96. The intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis initially involved all patients randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (n = 83), and then focused on patients who had an HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 48 (n = 56).. At week 96, 39 of 83 patients (47%) had HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL, five of 83 had HIV RNA between 50 and 400 copies/mL, and three of 83 had HIV RNA > 400 copies/mL. Focusing on the 56 patients with an HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 48, 38 of 56 patients (68%) had a sustained HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL to week 96. To week 96, a total of 28 patients (34%) had discontinued the study treatment. In addition, the allocated treatment was changed for seven patients. PI-associated resistance mutations were evident in five of 83 patients in the monotherapy arm from baseline to week 96.. By ITT analysis, 39 of the 83 patients initially randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy had HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 96. The occurrence in some patients of low-level viraemia (50-500 copies/mL) may increase the risk of drug resistance. First-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy cannot be systematically recommended.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Medication Adherence; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Zidovudine

Objective An open-label, three-period pharmacokinetic study was conducted to investigate the drug interaction potential between fosamprenavir (FPV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Methods Thirty-six healthy subjects received TDF 300 mg once daily (qd) for 7 days (period 1), and then were randomized to 14 days of either FPV 1400 mg twice daily (bid) or FPV/ritonavir (RTV) 700/100 mg bid alone or with TDF (period 2). Subjects continued their randomized dose of FPV for 14 more days, adding or removing TDF based upon its receipt in period 2 (period 3). Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetic sampling was carried out on day 7 of period 1 and on day 14 of periods 2 and 3. Steady-state plasma amprenavir (APV) and tenofovir (TFV) pharmacokinetics were assessed by noncompartmental analysis and parameter values observed with each regimen were compared using geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence intervals. Results After TDF coadministration, APV geometric mean minimum concentration (C(min)), maximum concentration (C(max)), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased by 31, 3 and 7% above values observed with unboosted FPV alone; they also increased by 31, 4 and 16% above values observed with FPV/RTV alone. TFV C(min), C(max) and AUC decreased by 12, 25 and 15% after FPV coadministration and by 9, 18 and 7% after FPV/RTV coadministration. No significant changes in RTV pharmacokinetics were observed. No differences were noted in adverse events among dosing periods. Conclusions In this evaluation of the interaction between FPV and TDF, increases in APV exposures and modest decreases in TFV exposures were observed. These were unlikely to be clinically significant.

Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Eruptions; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Organophosphonates; Prodrugs; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Young Adult

Although efavirenz and lopinavir/ritonavir(r) are both recommended antiretroviral agents in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients, there are few randomized comparisons of their efficacy and tolerability.. A multicenter and randomized study was performed including 126 antiretroviral-naïve patients, randomly assigned to efavirenz+Kivexa (n=63) or lopinavir/r+Kivexa (n=63). Efficacy endpoints were the percentage of patients with HIV-RNA < or =50 copies/mL at week 48 and CD4 recovery. Safety was assessed by comparing toxicity and discontinuations. Statistical analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis (Missing=Failure).. At week 48, 56.7% of patients in the efavirenz and 63.2% in the lopinavir/r groups showed HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (P=0.770) (intention-to-treat analysis; Missing=Failure). Only 1 (1.53%) patient from each group experienced virological failure. CD4 values increased in both groups (298 cells in the efavirenz group, P=0.001; 249 cells in the lopinavir/r group, P=0.002; P=0.126 between groups). HDL-cholesterol only increased in the efavirenz group (from 39+/-12 mg/dL to 49+/-11; P=0.001). Discontinuations were more frequent in the lopinavir/r group (36.5% versus 28.5%; P=0.193), but more patients with efavirenz interrupted due to toxicity (11.1% versus 6.3%); most of them were attributed to hypersensitivity reaction.. Similar virological efficacy was observed for efavirenz and lopinavir/r, when administered with Kivexa in antiretroviral-naïve patients, while immunological improvement was slightly superior for efavirenz. The higher rate of discontinuation due to toxicity in the efavirenz group was related to a higher incidence of hypersensitivity reaction. Nowadays, the use of the new formulation of lopinavir/r and the HLA-B*5701 genotype test before starting abacavir should improve the safety profiles of these regimens.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Combinations; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Withholding Treatment

Protease inhibitors and other antiretroviral drugs have been associated with dyslipidemia, endothelial dysfunction, and increased cardiovascular disease risk. The protease inhibitor atazanavir has an advantageous lipid profile; we studied its effects on arterial function and other metabolic and inflammatory cardiovascular disease risk factors.. Prospective, randomized, multinational trial in HIV-infected patients receiving stable protease inhibitor-based therapy with plasma HIV RNA less than 500 copies/ml and fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol more than 130 mg/dl, or triglycerides more than 200 mg/dl.. Patients were randomized to continue their current protease inhibitor or switch the protease inhibitor to atazanavir and continue ritonavir if given as a protease inhibitor booster for 24 weeks. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, lipoproteins, and inflammatory and metabolic markers were measured at baseline, week 12, and week 24. Median changes within (signed rank test) and between (Wilcoxon test) arms were calculated.. Twenty-six patients switched to atazanavir (all continued on ritonavir); 24 remained on their protease inhibitor regimen. Median CD4 cell count was 499 cells/mul, total cholesterol 204 mg/dl, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 122 mg/dl, and triglycerides 244 mg/dl. There were no significant changes in flow-mediated dilation after 12 and 24 weeks. At 24 weeks, significant changes in the atazanavir vs. continued protease inhibitor group were observed for total cholesterol (-25 vs. +1.5 mg/dl, P = 0.009), triglycerides (-58 vs. +3.5 mg/dl, P = 0.013), and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-27 vs. -0.5 mg/dl, P = 0.014).. In dyslipidemic individuals with suppressed HIV RNA on stable therapy, changing the protease inhibitor to atazanavir/ritonavir for 24 weeks improved lipids; however, endothelial function, inflammatory, and metabolic markers did not change.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cardiovascular Diseases; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir

In virologically suppressed patients, darunavir-ritonavir (DRV/r) monotherapy could maintain virological suppression similarly to DRV/r and two nucleosides.. Two hundred and fifty-six patients with HIV RNA less than 50 copies/ml for over 24 weeks on current antiretrovirals [non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based (43%), or protease inhibitor-based (57%)], switched to DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily, either as monotherapy (n = 127) or with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (n = 129). Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels above 50 copies/ml (TLOVR) by week 48, or switches off study treatment. The trial had 80% power to show noninferiority for the monotherapy arm (delta = -12%).. Patients were 81% male and 91% Caucasian, with mean age 44 years, and CD4 cell count of 574 cells/microl. In the primary efficacy analysis, HIV RNA less than 50 copies/ml by week 48 (per protocol) was 86.2 versus 87.8% in the monotherapy and triple therapy arms; by intent-to-treat switch equals failure, efficacy was 84.3 versus 85.3%; by a switch-included analysis, efficacy was 93.5 versus 95.1%: all three comparisons showed noninferior efficacy for DRV/r monotherapy. CD4 cell counts remained stable during the trial in both arms. One patient per arm showed at least one protease inhibitor mutation, and one patient in the triple therapy arm showed an NRTI mutation. Nine patients per arm discontinued randomized treatment for either adverse events or other reasons. No new or unexpected safety signals were detected.. In this study for patients with HIV RNA less than 50 copies/ml on other antiretrovirals at baseline, switching to DRV/r monotherapy showed noninferior efficacy versus triple antiretroviral therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir demonstrated similar antiviral efficacy to twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir over 48 weeks, with less gastrointestinal disturbance and a better lipid profile, in treatment-naive patients.. International, multicenter, open-label, 96-week noninferiority randomized trial of atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once daily vs lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily, each in combination with fixed-dose tenofovir/emtricitabine 300/200 mg once daily, in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at 48 weeks. Results through 96 weeks are reported.. Of 883 patients enrolled, 440 were randomized to atazanavir/ritonavir and 443 to lopinavir/ritonavir. At week 96, more patients receiving atazanavir/ritonavir achieved HIV RNA <50 copies/mL (74% vs 68%, P < 0.05) in the intent-to-treat analysis. On both regimens, 7% of subjects were virologic failures by 96 weeks. Bilirubin-associated disorders were greater in patients taking atazanavir/ritonavir. Treatment-related gastrointestinal adverse events were greater in patients taking lopinavir/ritonavir. Mean changes from baseline in fasting total cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides at week 96 were significantly higher with lopinavir/ritonavir (P < 0.0001).. Noninferiority of atazanavir/ritonavir to lopinavir/ritonavir was confirmed at 96 weeks. Atazanavir/ritonavir had a better lipid profile and fewer gastrointestinal adverse events than lopinavir/ritonavir.

Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Deoxycytidine; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

To evaluate the influence of nevirapine on atazanavir trough concentrations (Ctrough) in a group of HIV-infected patients, we performed an open-label pilot study enrolling patients receiving 300/100 mg atazanavir/ritonavir once daily for 2 weeks or longer. Nevirapine was added at a dose of 200 mg once daily from Days 0 to 14 and 200 mg twice daily from Days 14 to 28. Atazanavir and nevirapine plasma Ctroughs were determined at Days 0 and 28. Atazanavir Ctroughs were compared between Days 0 and 28. Atazanavir and nevirapine Ctroughs at Day 28 were compared with historical controls receiving either 400 mg atazanavir once daily or 200 mg nevirapine twice daily.. Fourteen patients were enrolled and 11 completed the study. The geometric mean (range) atazanavir Ctrough decreased from 0.631 mg/L (range, 0.235-1.87 mg/L) at Day 0 to 0.316 mg/L (range, 0.142-1.109 mg/L) at Day 28 to give a geometric mean ratio of 0.59 (95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.80; P = 0.026); nonetheless, the atazanavir Ctrough remained higher than the minimum effective concentration in 80% of the participants and higher than the median concentration in the control subjects receiving 400 mg atazanavir once daily without ritonavir (geometric mean ratio, 3.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.65-6.22; P = 0.001). The nevirapine Ctrough at Day 28 was slightly higher than in the historical controls on 200 mg nevirapine twice daily without atazanavir (geometric mean ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.06; P = 0.030).. We conclude that coadministration of 300/100 mg atazanavir/ritonavir once daily plus 200 mg nevirapine twice daily was safe and well tolerated but resulted in a decrease of atazanavir Ctrough by nearly half. Therefore, monitoring atazanavir Ctrough is recommended in patients treated with this drug combination, and increasing the atazanavir dose might be necessary.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nevirapine; Oligopeptides; Pilot Projects; Pyridines; Ritonavir

Agents that block the CCR5 coreceptor for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have demonstrated potent antiretroviral activity. In early clinical studies, the CCR5 antagonist vicriviroc proved to be a safe and effective component of combination antiretroviral therapy.. This double-blind, dose-ranging, phase 2 trial randomized subjects to receive 30 mg or 20 mg of vicriviroc or placebo once daily plus re-optimized background therapy containing a protease inhibitor with ritonavir. Subjects were adults infected with CCR5-tropic HIV who were experiencing failure of triple antiretroviral regimens. The primary end point was mean change in baseline log(10) HIV RNA level at 48 weeks, based on an intent-to-treat analysis.. One hundred fourteen persons received vicriviroc at 30 mg (n = 39), vicriviroc at 20 mg (n =40), or placebo (n = 35). The mean change in baseline HIV RNA level at week 48 was -1.77 log(10) copies/mL for 30 mg of vicriviroc and -1.75 log(10) copies/mL for 20 mg of vicriviroc, compared with -0.79 log(10) copies/mL for placebo (P =.002 and P=.003, respectively, compared with placebo). Mean CD4 counts increased by 102, 136, and 63 cells/mm(3) for 30 mg vicriviroc, 20 mg vicriviroc, and placebo, respectively (P = .260 and P = .039, respectively, compared with placebo). Rates of adverse events (mostly mild-to-moderate) were 111.4, 112.5, and 147.4 events per 100 subject-years, respectively.. Vicriviroc administered with a protease inhibitor plus ritonavir-containing regimen shows potent antiretroviral and immunologic activity sustained over 48 weeks in treatment-experienced patients.. NCT00243230 .

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cohort Studies; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Immunosuppression Therapy; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

To reduce lipid abnormalities and other side-effects associated with antiretroviral regimens containing lopinavir-ritonavir, patients might want to switch one or more components of their regimen. We compared substitution of raltegravir for lopinavir-ritonavir with continuation of lopinavir-ritonavir in HIV-infected patients with stable viral suppression on lopinavir-ritonavir-based combination therapy.. The SWITCHMRK 1 and 2 studies were multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3, randomised controlled trials. HIV-infected patients aged 18 years or older were eligible if they had documented viral RNA (vRNA) concentration below the limit of assay quantification for at least 3 months while on a lopinavir-ritonavir-based regimen. 707 eligible patients were randomly allocated by interactive voice response system in a 1:1 ratio to switch from lopinavir-ritonavir to raltegravir (400 mg twice daily; n=353) or to remain on lopinavir-ritonavir (two 200 mg/50 mg tablets twice daily; n=354), while continuing background therapy consisting of at least two nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Primary endpoints were the mean percentage change in serum lipid concentrations from baseline to week 12; the proportion of patients with vRNA concentration less than 50 copies per mL at week 24 (with all treated patients who did not complete the study counted as failures) with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of -12% for each study; and the frequency of adverse events up to 24 weeks. Analyses were done according to protocol. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00443703 and NCT00443729.. 702 patients received at least one dose of study drug and were included in the efficacy and safety analyses for the combined trials (raltegravir, n=350; lopinavir-ritonavir, n=352). Percentage changes in lipid concentrations from baseline to week 12 were significantly greater (p<0.0001) in the raltegravir group than in the lopinavir-ritonavir group in each study, yielding combined results for total cholesterol -12.6%vs 1.0%, non-HDL cholesterol -15.0%vs 2.6%, and triglycerides -42.2%vs 6.2%. At week 24, 293 (84.4%, 95% CI 80.2-88.1) of 347 patients in the raltegravir group had vRNA concentration less than 50 copies per mL compared with 319 (90.6%, 87.1-93.5) of 352 patients in the lopinavir-ritonavir group (treatment difference -6.2%, -11.2 to -1.3). Clinical and laboratory adverse events occurred at similar frequencies in the treatment groups. There were no serious drug-related adverse events or deaths. The only drug-related clinical adverse event of moderate to severe intensity reported in 1% or more of either treatment group was diarrhoea, which occurred in ten patients in the lopinavir-ritonavir group (3%) and no patients in the raltegravir group. The studies were terminated at week 24 because of lower than expected virological efficacy in the raltegravir group compared with the lopinavir-ritonavir group.. Although switching to raltegravir was associated with greater reductions in serum lipid concentrations than was continuation of lopinavir-ritonavir, efficacy results did not establish non-inferiority of raltegravir to lopinavir-ritonavir.. Merck.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Cholesterol, LDL; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viremia

To compare the efficacy of efavirenz (EFV) vs lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in combination with azidothymidine/lamivudine in antiretroviral therapy naive, HIV+ individuals presenting for care with CD4 counts <200/mm.. Prospective, randomized, open label, multicenter trial in Mexico. HIV-infected subjects with CD4 <200/mm were randomized to receive open label EFV or LPV/r plus azidothymidine/lamivudine (fixed-dose combination) for 48 weeks. Randomization was stratified by baseline CD4 cell count (< or =100 or >100/mm). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at 48 weeks by intention-to-treat analysis.. A total of 189 patients (85% men) were randomized to receive EFV (95) or LPV/r (94). Median baseline CD4 were 64 and 52/mm, respectively (P = not significant). At week 48, by intention-to-treat analysis, 70% of EFV and 53% of LPV/r patients achieved HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL [estimated difference 17% (95% confidence interval 3.5 to 31), P = 0.013]. The proportion with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL was 73% with EFV and 65% with LPV/r (P = 0.25). Virologic failure occurred in 7 patients on EFV and 17 on LPV/r. Mean CD4 count increases (cells/mm) were 234 for EFV and 239 for LPV/r. Mean change in total cholesterol and triglyceride levels were 50 and 48 mg/dL in EFV and 63 and 116 mg/dL in LPV/r (P = 0.24 and P < 0.01).. In these very advanced HIV-infected ARV-naive subjects, EFV-based highly active antiretroviral therapy had superior virologic efficacy than LPV/r-based highly active antiretroviral therapy, with a more favorable lipid profile.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Mexico; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral

Etravirine, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, was provided through an international early access program (EAP) prior to regulatory approval.. The Phase III, nonrandomized, open-label EAP investigated etravirine 200 mg twice daily plus a background regimen (BR) in patients who had failed multiple antiretroviral regimens. Efficacy and safety are reported for HIV-infected adults from the United States through week 48, including subgroups receiving etravirine +/- darunavir/ritonavir and/or raltegravir.. The intent-to-treat population included 2578 patients; 62.4% and 56.7% of patients received darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir, respectively, in their BR. At week 48, 62.3% of patients achieved viral loads <75 copies per milliliter; responses across subgroups were similar. Median CD4 count increase from baseline was >100 cells per cubic millimeter. No unexpected safety concerns emerged; serious AEs and deaths due to AEs, considered possibly related to etravirine, occurred in 2.0% and 0.3% of patients, respectively. Discontinuations due to AEs were low overall (4.4%) and comparable across subgroups.. Etravirine combined with a BR, often including other new antiretrovirals, such as darunavir/ritonavir and/or raltegravir, provided an effective treatment option in treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; United States; Viral Load

To compare the safety and antiviral activity of once (QD) or twice (BID) daily lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in combination with investigator-selected nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in treatment-experienced subjects.. Subjects failing treatment with HIV-1 RNA > 1000 copies per milliliter received LPV/r tablets 800/200 mg QD (n = 300) or 400/100 mg BID (n = 299) with investigator-chosen nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Efficacy was determined by the intent-to-treat time to loss of virologic response (ITT-TLOVR) algorithm. Safety, tolerability, adherence, impact of baseline protease mutations on virologic response, and emergence of resistance on therapy were assessed.. Demographics were comparable across groups. By intent-to-treat time to loss of virologic response, 166 QD subjects (55.3%) and 155 BID subjects (51.8%) were responders at week 48 (P = 0.413), with similar mean increases in CD4 T-cell count. QD subjects demonstrated better adherence than BID subjects. The occurrence of treatment-related moderate/severe adverse events was comparable for all events except nausea, which was reported more frequently among BID-treated subjects. Emergence of new protease resistance mutations on treatment was similarly infrequent in both groups.. LPV/r dosed QD resulted in increased treatment adherence and was as efficacious as BID LPV/r while providing similar safety, tolerability, and limited resistance evolution.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Nausea; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Viral Load; Young Adult

This phase 2, randomized, active-controlled, 48-week study assessed the noninferiority of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) integrase inhibitor elvitegravir to comparator ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (CPI/r) in treatment-experienced subjects.. Subjects had HIV RNA levels 1000 copies/mL and 1 protease resistance mutation. Subjects received nucleoside or nucleotide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) with or without T-20 and either CPI/r or once-daily elvitegravir at a dose of 20 mg, 50 mg, or 125 mg (blinded to dose) with ritonavir. After week 8, the independent data monitoring committee stopped the elvitegravir 20 mg arm and allowed subjects in the elvitegravir 50 mg and 125 mg arms to add protease inhibitors. The primary end point was the time-weighted average change from baseline in HIV RNA level through week 24 (DAVG(24)).. A total of 278 subjects with a median of 11 protease and 3 thymidine analog mutations were randomized and treated. One-half of subjects received NRTIs without expected antiviral activity. Compared with the DAVG(24) for the CPI/r arm (-1.19 log(10) copies/mL), the elvitegravir 50 mg arm was noninferior (-1.44 log(10) copies/mL), and the elvitegravir 125 mg arm was superior (-1.66 log(10) copies/mL; P = .021). Efficacy was impacted by activity of background agents. There was no relationship between elvitegravir dosage and adverse events.. Elvitegravir was well-tolerated and produced rapid virologic suppression that was durable with active background therapy. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number: NCT00298350.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Quinolones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The Study of Aldesleukin with and without antiretroviral therapy (STALWART) evaluated whether intermittent interleukin-2 (IL-2) alone or with antiretroviral therapy (ART) around IL-2 cycles increased CD4(+) counts compared to no therapy.. Participants not on continuous ART with > or = 300 CD4(+) cells/mm(3) were randomized to: no treatment; IL-2 for 5 consecutive days every 8 weeks for 3 cycles; or the same IL-2 regimen with 10 days of ART administered around each IL-2 cycle. CD4(+) counts, HIV RNA, and HIV progression events were collected monthly.. A total of 267 participants were randomized. At week 32, the mean CD4(+) count was 134 cells greater in the IL-2 alone group (p<0.001), and 133 cells greater in the IL-2 plus ART group (p<0.001) compared to the no therapy group. Twelve participants in the IL-2 groups compared to 1 participant in the group assigned to no therapy experienced an opportunistic event or died (HR 5.84, CI: 0.59 to 43.57; p = 0.009).. IL-2 alone or with peri-cycle HAART increases CD4(+) counts but was associated with a greater number of opportunistic events or deaths compared to no therapy. These results call into question the immunoprotective significance of IL-2-induced CD4(+) cells.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00110812.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Furans; HIV Infections; Humans; Interleukin-2; Lopinavir; Male; Nausea; Oligopeptides; Opportunistic Infections; Organophosphates; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Dosing frequency is an important determinant of regimen effectiveness. Methods. To compare efficacy of once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) antiretroviral therapy, we randomized human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive, treatment-naive patients to lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) administered at a dosage of 400 mg of lopinavir and 100 mg of ritonavir BID (n = 160) or 800 mg of lopinavir and 200 mg of ritonavir QD (n = 161), plus either emtricitabine 200 mg QD and extended-release stavudine at a dosage of 100 mg QD or tenofovir at a dosage of 300 mg QD. Randomization was stratified by screening HIV RNA level <100,000 copies/mL versus > or = 100,000 copies/mL. The primary efficacy end point was sustained virologic response (SVR; defined as reaching and maintaining an HIV RNA level <200 copies/mL) through week 48.. Subjects were 78% male, 33% Hispanic, and 34% black. A total of 82% of subjects completed the study, and 71% continued to receive the initially assigned dosage schedule. The probability of SVR did not differ significantly for the BID versus QD comparison, with an absolute proportional difference of 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07 to 0.12). The comparison depended on the screening RNA stratum (P=.038); in the higher RNA stratum, the probability of SVR was significantly better in the BID arm than in the QD arm: 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79-0.94) versus 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.84), a difference of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.01-0.25). Lopinavir trough plasma concentrations were higher with BID dosing. Adherence to prescribed doses of LPV/r was 90.6% in the QD arm versus 79.9% in the BID arm (P<.001). Conclusions. Although subjects assigned to QD regimens had better adherence, overall treatment outcomes were similar in the QD and BID arms. Subjects with HIV RNA levels > or =100,000 copies/mL had better SVR with BID regimens at 48 weeks, which suggests a possible advantage in this setting for more frequent dosing. Clinical trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00036452.

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

South African guidelines recommend protease-inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) with lopinavir-ritonavir for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children <36 months of age. We investigated factors associated with viral suppression and mortality among young children initiating ART.. Treatment-naive, ART-eligible, HIV-infected children (aged 6-104 weeks) were enrolled in an ART strategies trial in South Africa and initiated protease-inhibitor-based ART. Mortality and the probability of viral suppression (defined as HIV RNA load of <400 copies/mL) by 39 weeks after ART initiation were investigated.. Of 254 children who initiated ART, 99 (39%) were cotreated for tuberculosis during follow-up. The mortality rate was 14%. Factors predicting mortality were lower pre-ART weight-for-age z score and higher HIV RNA load. By 39 weeks, 84% of surviving children achieved viral suppression. Children who were not cotreated for tuberculosis were more likely to achieve viral suppression (94.8%) than were children who were receiving cotreatment at ART initiation (74.2%) or who started tuberculosis cotreatment after ART initiation (51.6%; P < .001). Other factors predicting lower probability of viral suppression were lower pre-ART weight- and length-for-age z score, higher HIV RNA load, and World Health Organization disease stage.. High rates of viral suppression can be achieved among infants and young children who initiate protease-inhibitor-based ART. Cotreatment for tuberculosis reduced viral suppression. How best to treat HIV-infected children who require tuberculosis treatment warrants urgent investigation.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antitubercular Agents; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ethionamide; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infant; Isoniazid; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Rifampin; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; South Africa; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary; Viral Load

Despite being among the most potent protease inhibitors, the use of tipranavir (TPV) is hampered by a high pill burden and frequent side effects compared with other boosted protease inhibitors. A total of 10 patients receiving TPV/ritonavir (TPV/RTV) 500/200 for longer than 6 months were randomized to stay on the same dosing schedule or switch to TPV/RTV 500/100. Although all patients on TVP/RTV 500/200 remained stable for the next 12 weeks, 3 out of 5 patients who switched doses experienced benefits in terms of reducing aminotransferases and total cholesterol. Fasting triglycerides were also reduced in 2 of them. Plasma HIV-RNA remained undetectable in all patients, despite the observed decline in TPV trough concentrations.

Topics: Adult; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Lipoatrophy can complicate thymidine analogue nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (tNRTI)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART). Lipoatrophy may be less likely with ART including ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r). Small, placebo-controlled studies found that uridine (in tNRTI recipients) and pravastatin improved HIV lipoatrophy over 12 weeks. Today, most patients with lipoatrophy receive non-tNRTI-based ART; the effect of uridine in such patients is unknown.. We performed a prospective, randomized trial in lipoatrophic adults with plasma HIV RNA<50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL on tNRTI-sparing ART including LPV/r. Patients received uridine [36 g three times a day (tid) on 10 consecutive days per month; n=10], pravastatin [40 mg every night (nocte); n=12], uridine plus pravastatin (n=11) or neither (n=12) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was mean change in limb fat mass as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). With 20 patients per intervention, the study had 80% power to detect a mean difference between a treatment and the control of 0.5 kg, assuming a standard deviation of 0.9 and an alpha threshold equal to 5% (two-sided).. Of 45 participants (all men, with median age 49.5 years and median limb fat 2.6 kg), two discontinued pravastatin and one participant stopped both pravastatin and uridine. The difference between the mean changes in limb fat mass for uridine vs. no uridine was 0.03 kg [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.35, +0.28; P=0.79]. The respective difference for pravastatin was -0.03 kg (95% CI -0.29, +0.34; P=0.84). Pravastatin slightly decreased total cholesterol (0.44 mmol/L; P=0.099). Visceral adipose tissue measured by computed tomography did not change significantly.. In this population and at the doses used, neither uridine nor pravastatin for 24 weeks significantly increased limb fat mass.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adiposity; Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Anticholesteremic Agents; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Extremities; HIV Infections; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pravastatin; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Uridine

To study the impact of protease inhibitor monotherapy on the HIV-1 blood reservoir in 72 antiretroviral-naive patients.. This was evaluated for 72 antiretroviral-naive patients included in the on-treatment analysis of the MONARK trial; 46 patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy and 26 patients receiving a triple therapy. HIV-DNA was quantified in whole blood, using real-time PCR.. The decrease in HIV-DNA after 48 weeks of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy was similar to the decrease observed with triple therapy including lopinavir/ritonavir (-0.77 versus -0.69 log copies/10(6) leucocytes, respectively; P = 0.91). The HIV-DNA decrease was also similar in patients with a virological response in both arms (-0.69 versus -0.69 log copies/10(6) leucocytes, respectively). Interestingly, non-responders had a significantly higher baseline HIV-DNA load than responders in the monotherapy arm; 3.16 versus 2.86 log copies/10(6) leucocytes, respectively (P = 0.05).. The MONARK data indicate that a lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy regimen is potent against HIV blood reservoirs in antiretroviral-naive patients after 1 year of treatment, in comparison with a standard-of-care highly active antiretroviral therapy. This impact should be evaluated with other boosted protease inhibitor monotherapies.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Blood Cells; DNA, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Viral Load

Population genotyping (PG) can underestimate resistance if resistance-containing low abundance variants go undetected. PG and clonal analysis (CA) results were compared in virologic failures (VFs) from a 48-week clinical trial that evaluated once-daily fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FPV/r) 1400 mg/100 mg or atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) 300 mg/100 mg, each combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine, in antiretroviral-naive patients. VF was defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA > or =400 copies/ml at > or =24 weeks or viral rebound >400 copies/ml any time following viral suppression. All patients had baseline PG. One hundred and six patients enrolled (53/arm). Baseline resistance mutations were more prevalent in patients receiving FPV/r (10/53) than ATV/r (3/53). Seven patients (7%) were VFs-four on FPV/r and three on ATV/r. In the four FPV/r-treated VFs, baseline HIV TAMs combinations and/or PI mutations were detected in one by PG at VF (RT: L210W + T215C; PR: M46I + L76V) and three others by CA alone (RT: L210W + T215Y; RT: M41L; RT: K65R + K70R; PR: I47V); all four had study drug-associated mutations (CA detecting more HIV-1 resistance mutations than PG). In the three ATV/r VFs, no baseline drug-associated mutations were detected by PG; for one patient CA detected RT: K65R; PR: I84V. Phylogenetic analysis revealed tight clustering for FPV/r-treated VFs with highly related clones, whereas HIV-1 from ATV/r-treated VFs had no outgrowth from baseline of low abundance resistance-containing variants. In conclusion, low-abundance HIV resistance-containing variants were detected in baseline samples from patients with VF. The archived viruses that reemerged under selection pressure and acquired additional mutations were found primarily in patients in the FPV/r arm. Despite this and a baseline resistance imbalance between the two arms, FPV/r and ATV/r provided similar virologic suppression through 48 weeks; however, these findings highlight the necessity for the development of quick and inexpensive methods for detection of minority species to better guide therapy selection.

Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; Deoxycytidine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Furans; Genetic Variation; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphates; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sequence Analysis, RNA; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Treatment Failure

The pharmacokinetics of some HIV protease inhibitors are altered in patients with hepatic impairment. The TMC114-C134 study assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of darunavir/ritonavir 600 mg/100 mg twice daily in HIV-negative subjects with hepatic impairment (defined according to Child-Pugh classification A [mild] or B [moderate]) compared with matched, HIV-negative, healthy subjects.. All subjects received darunavir/ritonavir 600 mg/100 mg twice daily for 6 days with a morning dose on day 7. Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained up to 72 hours post-dose for darunavir and 12 hours post-dose for ritonavir on day 7. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.. Darunavir pharmacokinetics in subjects with mild (n = 8) and moderate (n = 8) hepatic impairment were comparable to those in matched healthy control subjects (n = 16). In those with mild hepatic impairment, the least square mean ratios relative to healthy subjects for darunavir exposure (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours) and for maximum and minimum plasma concentrations were 0.94 (90% CI 0.75, 1.17), 0.88 (90% CI 0.73, 1.07) and 0.83 (90% CI 0.63, 1.10), respectively. In those with moderate hepatic impairment, these values were 1.20 (90% CI 0.90, 1.60), 1.22 (90% CI 0.95, 1.56) and 1.27 (90% CI 0.87, 1.85), respectively. Ritonavir pharmacokinetics were comparable between healthy subjects and those with mild hepatic impairment, but mean exposure was 50% higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. Darunavir/ritonavir was generally well tolerated, regardless of hepatic impairment. All adverse events were grade 1-2 in severity, except for a grade 3 increase in alanine aminotransferase reported in one subject with mild hepatic impairment. No adverse events led to discontinuation.. The results of this study show that the pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir 600 mg/100 mg are not affected by mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Therefore, it is recommended that dose adjustments of darunavir/ritonavir are not required in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Liver Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Nucleoside-sparing combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens might be an attractive therapeutic option for HIV type-1 (HIV-1)-infected patients; however, the pharmacokinetic profiles of such regimens are frequently unknown.. Fourteen HIV-1-infected patients (age 21-55 years, 64% male) on stable cART with plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/ml entered this Phase I pharmacokinetic study. In period 1, patients received tenofovir/emtricitabine/-darunavir/ritonavir (300/200/800/100 mg) all once daily. During period 2, raltegravir 400 mg twice daily was added to the regimen and in period 3 tenofovir/emtricitabine was discontinued. At steady state, intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was undertaken. Differences in the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for pharmacokinetic parameters between periods 2 versus 1 and period 3 versus 1 were assessed for darunavir and ritonavir (period 3 versus 2 for raltegravir).. No statistically significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were observed between period 2 versus period 1. During period 3, darunavir GMR (95% confidence interval) values for trough and maximum plasma concentration (C(trough) and C(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and elimination half-life (t(1/2)) were 0.64 ng/ml (0.44-0.93), 1.05 ng/ml (0.90-1.24), 0.92 ng h/ml (0.78-1.08) and 0.69 h (0.46-1.05), respectively, when compared with period 1. No statistically significant changes were observed in ritonavir or raltegravir pharmacokinetic parameters. Darunavir C(trough)<550 ng/ml (the minimum effective concentration for protease-resistant HIV viral isolates) was observed in four patients during period 3 only. No clinically significant safety concerns were reported.. Darunavir C(trough) is reduced by 36% when administered without tenofovir/emtricitabine in HIV-1-infected patients. This interaction might be of clinical significance in the management of individuals with protease-resistant HIV viral isolates.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Deoxycytidine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

We explored a treatment simplification strategy to darunavir/ritonavir 900/100 mg once daily guided by the darunavir virtual inhibitory quotient (vIQ) in patients receiving salvage therapy with darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily.. Open-label, randomized pilot study in HIV-infected patients on darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily (viral load <50 copies/ml; darunavir vIQ >2). Thirty patients were randomized to darunavir/ritonavir 900/100 mg once daily (once-daily group, n=15) or 600/100 mg twice daily (twice-daily group, n=15). Viral load, blood chemistry, and darunavir and ritonavir trough plasma concentrations (C(trough)) were determined up to 48 weeks. If the darunavir vIQ fell to <1.5, the dosage was switched to 600/100 mg twice daily. The primary end point was the percentage of 48-week treatment failure.. Patients had taken a mean 11.6 (sd +/-3.9) antiretroviral regimens before darunavir/ritonavir administration. The proportion of patients without 48-week treatment failure was 86.7% in both groups. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) darunavir C(trough) decreased from 3.09 mg/l (IQR 2.43-3.93) at baseline to 1.60 mg/l (IQR 1.25-2.04) at week 48 (P=0.001) in the once-daily group. Three once-daily group patients switched to darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily. Fewer patients had triglyceride levels >200 mg/dl at week 48 in the once-daily group (20.0%) than in the twice-daily group (20.0% versus 57.1%; P=0.046).. Treatment simplification to darunavir/-ritonavir 900/100 mg once daily guided by the darunavir vIQ in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients receiving darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice-daily seems to be safe enough to be tested in adequately powered clinical trials.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pilot Projects; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir-ritonavir with and without nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) in Ugandan adults. The study design was a three-period crossover study (3 tablets [600 mg of lopinavir/150 mg of ritonavir {600/150 mg}], 4 capsules [533/133 mg], and 2 tablets [400/100 mg] twice a day [BD]; n = 40) of lopinavir-ritonavir with NNRTIs and a parallel one-period study (2 tablets BD; n = 20) without NNRTIs. Six-point pharmacokinetic sampling (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h) was undertaken after observed intake with a standardized breakfast. Ugandan DART trial participants receiving efavirenz (n = 20), nevirapine (n = 18), and no NNRTI (n = 20) had median ages of 41, 35, and 37 years, respectively, and median weights of 60, 64, and 63 kg, respectively. For the no-NNRTI group, the geometric mean (percent coefficient of variation [%CV]) lopinavir area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) was 110.1 (34%) microg x h/liter. For efavirenz, the geometric mean lopinavir AUC(0-12) (%CV) values were 91.8 microg x h/liter (58%), 65.7 microg x h/liter (39%), and 54.0 microg x h/liter (65%) with 3 tablets, 4 capsules, and 2 tablets BD, respectively, with corresponding (within-individual) geometric mean ratios (GMR) for 3 and 2 tablets versus 4 capsules of 1.40 (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 1.65; P = 0.002) and 0.82 (90% CI, 0.68 to 0.99; P = 0.09), respectively, and the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) values were reduced by 58% and 1%, respectively. For nevirapine, the geometric mean lopinavir AUC(0-12) (%CV) values were 112.9 microg x h/liter (30%), 68.1 microg x h/liter (53%), and 61.5 microg x h/liter (52%), respectively, with corresponding GMR values of 1.66 (90% CI, 1.46 to 1.88; P < 0.001) and 0.90 (90% CI, 0.77 to 1.06; P = 0.27), respectively, and the CL/F was reduced by 57% and 7%, respectively. Higher values for the lopinavir concentration at 12 h (C(12)) were observed with 3 tablets and efavirenz-nevirapine (P = 0.04 and P = 0.0005, respectively), and marginally lower C(12) values were observed with 2 tablets and efavirenz-nevirapine (P = 0.08 and P = 0.26, respectively). These data suggest that 2 tablets of lopinavir-ritonavir BD may be inadequate when dosed with NNRTIs in Ugandan adults, and the dosage should be increased by the addition of an additional adult tablet or a half-dose tablet (100/25 mg), where available.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nevirapine; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Uganda

Switching to raltegravir in selected patients treated with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors may result in similar efficacy and lower plasma lipids.. SPIRAL is a 48-week multicentre, open-label trial in which HIV-infected adults with less than 50 copies/ml of plasma HIV RNA for at least the previous 6 months on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy were randomized (1: 1) to switch from the ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor to raltegravir or to continue on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients free of treatment failure (noncompleter = failure) at 48 weeks. SPIRAL study was powered to show noninferior efficacy of raltegravir-based therapy with a margin of -12.5%.. Two hundred and seventy-three patients assigned to switch to raltegravir (n = 139) or to continue ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (n = 134) were included in the efficacy analysis. At 48 weeks, 89.2% (raltegravir-based therapy) and 86.6% (ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy) of the patients remained free of treatment failure [difference 2.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.2 to 10.6]. A total of 96.9% (raltegravir-based therapy) and 95.1% (ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy) of the patients remained free of virological failure (difference 1.8%; 95% CI -3.5 to 7.5). Switching to raltegravir was associated with significant decreases in plasma lipids and total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio relative to continuing ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor. Severe adverse events and study drug discontinuations due to any adverse event occurred in 4 and 2% of the patients in each group.. In patients with sustained virological suppression on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy, switching from ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor to raltegravir demonstrated noninferior efficacy and resulted in a better lipid profile at 48 weeks than continuing ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Most ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral regimens offer comparable levels of virological efficacy. Thus, the tolerability of the regimen becomes a distinguishing factor with implications for patient quality of life (QoL), treatment adherence, and clinical outcome. This article describes results from the CASTLE study (comparing once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir [ATV/RTV] with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir [LPV/RTV], both in combination with fixed-dose tenofovir/emtricitabine, in treatment-naive HIV-infected patients) and an evaluation of the impact of gastrointestinal (GI) complications of treatment on patient QoL, as measured by the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) QoL questionnaire (IBS-QoL). Changes in IBS-QoL from baseline over time (to week 24) were classified as: "Improvement" (> or =2-point positive change from baseline), "No change" (<2-point change), or "Worsening" (> or =2-point negative change). Data were collected on GI adverse events (AEs) and use of GI medications. Of the 599 patients with IBS-QoL-evaluable data through week 24, fewer patients in the ATV/RTV group than in the LPV/RTV group experienced grade 2-4 treatment-related GI AEs including diarrhea (3% versus 10%), nausea (5% versus 7%), and vomiting (<1% on both arms). Nearly three times as many patients receiving LPV/RTV used GI medications. ATV/RTV was associated with an increase in overall IBS-QoL scores and more patients receiving ATV/RTV than LPV/RTV experienced improvement in IBS-QoL through week 24. In contrast to LPV/RTV, ATV/RTV treatment was associated with earlier and more positive improvements in QoL scores across CD4 sub-groups. Differences in the health-related QoL profile between ATV/RTV and LPV/RTV may be important when selecting PI-based antiretroviral regimens.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Aged; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Deoxycytidine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Lopinavir; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Quality of Life; Ritonavir; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tenofovir; Young Adult

To examine how treatment adherence differences in ARTEMIS (96 week analysis) affected clinical outcome, and to assess factors impacting adherence.. ARTEMIS is a Phase III trial, in HIV-1-infected treatment-naive patients, comparing efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) versus lopinavir/ritonavir (800/200 mg total daily dose), each with a fixed-dose background tenofovir and emtricitabine regimen. Self-reported treatment adherence was assessed using the Modified Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory (M-MASRI). In post-hoc analyses, mean adherence from weeks 4-96 was used to assess overall adherence for each patient, and transformed into a binary variable (>95% , adherent; < or = 95% , suboptimally adherent).. Overall adherence was high: 83% of darunavir/ritonavir-treated patients and 78% of lopinavir/ritonavir-treated patients were >95% adherent. The difference in virological response rate for adherent versus suboptimally adherent patients was smaller for darunavir/ritonavir (6% difference: 82% versus 76%, P = 0.3312) than for lopinavir/ritonavir (25% difference: 78% versus 53%, P < 0.0001). In suboptimally adherent patients, a higher virological response rate was seen with darunavir/ritonavir (76%) versus lopinavir/ritonavir (53%) (P < 0.01). Suboptimally adherent patients (both treatment groups) reported more adverse events (AEs), including gastrointestinal AEs, than adherent patients. Darunavir/ritonavir had a lower rate of AEs, including gastrointestinal AEs, than lopinavir/ritonavir, in adherent and suboptimally adherent patients.. Suboptimal adherence had no significant effect on the virological response rate with once-daily darunavir/ritonavir treatment. In contrast, the lopinavir/ritonavir response rate was significantly reduced in suboptimally adherent patients compared with adherent patients. Once-daily darunavir/ritonavir resulted in a higher virological response rate in suboptimally adherent patients compared with lopinavir/ritonavir.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Medication Adherence; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

To evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in a population-based cohort of HIV-1-infected children.. All children enrolled in the Swiss Mother and Child HIV Cohort Study, treated with LPV/r-based combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) between November 2000 and October 2008, were included.. 88 children (25 (28%) protease inhibitor (PI)-naive, 16 (18%) ART-naive) were analysed (251 patient-years on LPV/r). After 48 weeks on LPV/r, 70 children had a median (interquartile range (IQR)) decrease in HIV-1 viral load of 4.25 log (5.45-3.17; PI-naive, n=17) and 2.53 (3.68-1.38; PI-experienced, n=53). Median (IQR) increase in CD4 count was 429 (203-593; PI-naive) and 177 (21-331; PI-experienced) cells/microl. These effects remained stable throughout 192 weeks for 25 children. Treatment was stopped for viral rebound in seven and suspected toxicity in 12 children.. Long-term treatment with LPV/r-based cART is safe and effective in HIV-1-infected children.

Topics: Adolescent; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Treatment simplification strategies involving induction with a ritonavir (RTV)-boosted (/r) protease inhibitor regimen followed by simplification (without RTV) are appealing because they may offer sustained virologic suppression while minimizing potential long-term adverse effects associated with RTV.. This open-label, randomized, noninferiority study enrolled 515 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients to receive abacavir/lamivudine plus atazanavir/RTV (ATV/r) followed by randomization at week 36 (N = 419) to maintain or discontinue RTV for an additional 48 weeks. Eligibility for randomization required confirmed HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml and no virologic failure. Protocol-defined virologic failure after week 36 was confirmed rebound of HIV RNA level at least 400 copies/ml. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml at week 84 (time to loss of virologic response). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00440947.. At week 84, noninferiority of ATV to ATV/r (95% confidence interval around the treatment difference -1.75 to 12.48%) was demonstrated with 181 of 210 (86%) patients in the ATV group and 169 of 209 (81%) in the ATV/r group maintaining HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml. During the randomized phase (weeks 36-84), 10 versus 14% of patients in the ATV and ATV/r arms, respectively, experienced a drug-related grades 2-4 adverse event with hyperbilirubinemia being the most frequently reported (4 versus 10%). The overall rate of protocol-defined virologic failure was 2%; no patient had virus that developed a major protease inhibitor mutation.. ATV in combination with abacavir/lamivudine is a potent and well tolerated regimen in patients who have achieved initial suppression on an induction regimen and represents a viable treatment simplification strategy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and HIV viral load response following initiation during the third trimester of pregnancy of zidovudine plus standard-dose lopinavir boosted with ritonavir (LPV/r), twice daily, until delivery for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV.. Prospective study nested within a multicenter, three-arm, randomized, phase III prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV trial in Thailand (PHPT-5, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00409591).. Women randomized to receive 300 mg zidovudine and 400/100 mg LPV/r twice daily from 28 weeks' gestation, or as soon as possible thereafter, until delivery had intensive steady-state 12-h blood sampling performed. LPV/r pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Rules were defined a priori for a LPV/r dose escalation based on the proportion of women with an LPV area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) below 52 microg h/ml (10th percentile for LPV AUC in nonpregnant adults). HIV-1 RNA response was assessed during the third trimester.. Thirty-eight women were evaluable; at entry, median (range) gestational age was 29 (28-36) weeks, weight 59.5 (45.0-91.6) kg, CD4 cells count 442 (260-1327) cells/microl and HIV-1 RNA viral load 7818 (<40-402 015) copies/ml. Geometric mean (90% confidence interval) LPV AUC, Cmax and Cmin were 64.6 (59.7-69.8) microg h/ml, 8.1 (7.5-8.7) microg/ml and 2.7 (2.4-3.0) microg/ml, respectively. Thirty-one of 38 (81%) women had an LPV AUC above the AUC target. All women had a HIV-1 viral load less than 400 copies/ml at the time of delivery.. A short course of zidovudine plus standard-dose LPV/r initiated during the third trimester of pregnancy achieved adequate LPV exposure and virologic response.

Topics: Adult; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lopinavir; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Thailand; Viral Load; Young Adult; Zidovudine

The high antiviral potency and low toxicity of saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/r) prompted us to assess a viable strategy in chronic virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients.. A randomized, multicenter pilot trial. Patients taking triple HAART with (VL <50 copies/mL) and no history of virological failure with a protease inhibitor (PI) or PI-related resistance were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive SQV 1000 mg/ritonavir 100 mg BID (SQV/r group) or to continue with their habitual treatment (control group). Comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney test for medians, the t test or ANOVA for means, and the χ² or Fisher's exact test for proportions.. 28 patients were randomized: 17 to the SQV/r group and 11 to the control group. Only 1 patient from the SQV/r group experienced virological failure at week 48. A similar mean increase was observed in CD4+ T-cell counts in both groups at week 48. Three patients (17.6%) from the SQV/r group prematurely interrupted the study for reasons other than virological failure. HDL cholesterol increased significantly at week 48 in the SQV/r group (from 41±11 mg/dL to 56±35, P=.026); patients in the control group showed a decrease in LDL cholesterol (from 129±37 mg/dL to 107±17, P=.028). The median (IQR) trough plasma concentrations of SQV were 760 ng/mL (379.5-1332.25 ng/mL). Three patients had saquinavir concentrations lower than 100 ng/mL.. SQV/r as monotherapy has proven to be a valid, safe, and economical option for virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients, especially in those who experience intolerance or toxicity with nucleoside analogs.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Spain

The drug-drug interaction between rifabutin (RFB) and darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) was examined in a randomized, three-way crossover study of HIV-negative healthy volunteers who received DRV/r 600/100 mg twice a day (BID) (treatment A), RFB 300 mg once a day (QD) (treatment B), and DRV/r 600/100 mg BID plus RFB 150 mg every other day (QOD) (treatment C). The sequence of treatments was randomized, and each treatment period lasted 12 days. Full pharmacokinetic profiles were determined for DRV, ritonavir, and RFB and its active metabolite, 25-O-desacetylrifabutin (desRFB), on day 13. The DRV and ritonavir areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 12 h (AUC(12h)) increased by 57% and 66%, respectively, in the presence of RFB. The RFB exposure was comparable between treatment with RFB QD alone (treatment B) and treatment with DRV/r plus RFB QOD (treatment C); however, based on least-square means ratios, the minimum plasma concentration (C(min)) increased by 64% and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) decreased by 28%, respectively. The exposure (AUC within the dosage interval and at steady state [AUC(τ)]) to desRFB was considerably increased (by 881%) following treatment with DRV/r/RFB. The exposure to the parent drug plus the metabolite increased 1.6-fold in the presence of DRV/r. Adverse events (AEs) were more commonly reported during combined treatment (83% versus 44% for RFB and 28% for DRV/r); similarly, grade 3-4 AEs occurred in 17% versus 11% and 0%, respectively, of volunteers. Eighteen of 27 volunteers (66.7%) prematurely discontinued the trial; all volunteers discontinuing for safety reasons (n = 9) did so during RFB treatment phases. These results suggest that DRV/r may be coadministered with RFB with a dose adjustment of RFB to 150 mg QOD and increased monitoring for RFB-related AEs. Based on the overall safety profile of DRV/r, no dose adjustment of DRV/r is considered to be warranted. Given the safety profile seen with the combination of RFB with a boosted protease inhibitor in this and other studies, it is not recommended to conduct further studies with this combination in healthy volunteers.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

Sustained viral suppression with antiretroviral therapy improves clinical outcomes for HIV-infected individuals. Study M05-730 evaluated the long-term antiviral activity, safety, tolerability, emergence of resistance, and compliance with once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) combination therapy in treatment-naïve, HIV-1-infected subjects through 96 weeks. Antiretroviral-naïve subjects with HIV-1 RNA levels >1000 copies/ml were randomized to LPV/r QD (N = 333) or BID (N = 331) with tenofovir DF and emtricitabine. Through 96 weeks, 77 subjects from each group discontinued prematurely; adverse or HIV-related events contributed to discontinuation of 36 subjects overall, with no significant differences between treatment groups. At 96 weeks, 216 QD subjects (64.9%) and 229 BID subjects (69.2%) had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml (p = 0.249) by intent-to-treat analysis. Evaluation of the time to virologic failure indicated that 85.0% and 80.7% of QD and BID subjects, respectively, maintained virologic suppression through 96 weeks (p = 0.638). QD subjects demonstrated greater adherence levels. There were no significant differences in virologic response when subjects were analyzed according to baseline disease state. Emergence of postbaseline resistance mutations occurred at similar low rates in each dosing group. Diarrhea was the most common moderate-to-severe drug-related adverse event reported; the most common Grade 3+ laboratory abnormalities were elevations of total cholesterol and triglycerides, occurring with similar incidence regardless of LPV/r dosing frequency. QD dosing of LPV/r was associated with similar durability of viral suppression and low rates of genotypic resistance and treatment-limiting adverse events as compared with BID dosing in treatment-naïve subjects through 96 weeks of treatment.

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; Deoxycytidine; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Emtricitabine; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Organophosphonates; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

this study aimed to investigate the effect of antivirals ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral oxycodone, a widely used opioid receptor agonist used in the treatment of moderate to severe pain.. a randomized crossover study design with three phases at intervals of 4 weeks was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers. Ritonavir 300 mg, lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg, or placebo b.i.d. for 4 days was given to the subjects. On day 3, 10 mg oxycodone hydrochloride was administered orally. Plasma concentrations of oxycodone, noroxycodone, oxymorphone, and noroxymorphone were determined for 48 h. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with standard noncompartmental methods. Behavioral effects and experimental cold pain analgesia were assessed for 12 h. ANOVA for repeated measures was used for statistical analysis.. ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of oral oxycodone by 3.0-fold (range 1.9- to 4.3-fold; P <0.001) and 2.6-fold (range 1.9- to 3.3-fold; P <0.001). The mean (± SD) elimination half-life increased after ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir from 3.6 ± 0.6 to 5.6 ± 0.9 h (P <0.001) and 5.7 ± 0.9 h (P <0.001), respectively. Both ritonavir (P <0.001) and lopinavir/ritonavir (P <0.05) increased the self-reported drug effect of oxycodone.. ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir greatly increase the plasma concentrations of oral oxycodone in healthy volunteers and enhance its effect. When oxycodone is used clinically in patients during ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir treatment, reductions in oxycodone dose may be needed to avoid opioid-related adverse effects.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Finland; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Linear Models; Lopinavir; Male; Oxycodone; Pain; Pyrimidinones; Reference Values; Ritonavir; Time Factors; Young Adult

A pharmacokinetic trial was conducted to evaluate the potential for once-daily etravirine in antiretroviral regimens without and with darunavir/ritonavir.. During this multicentre, open-label, Phase IIa trial, treatment-naive patients aged > or =18 years with HIV type-1 (HIV-1) received etravirine 400 mg once daily with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine 300/200 mg once daily from days 1-14; on days 15-28, darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily was added. On day 29, etravirine was discontinued and patients continued with the other medications to day 42. Serial blood sampling for etravirine pharmacokinetics was performed over 24 h on day 14 and 28; patients fasted for > or =10 h prior to these visits.. Of 23 enrolled patients (male 87%, Caucasian 39%), pharmacokinetic profiles for etravirine were available for 21 and 20 patients on day 14 and 28, respectively. The plasma concentration-time profile and pharmacokinetics for etravirine were unchanged with or without darunavir/ritonavir. The mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) was reached 4 h after administration and was 790 and 801 ng/ml on day 14 and 28, respectively; mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from before administration to 24 h after administration was 10,410 ng*h/ml on day 14 and 10,720 ng*h/ml on day 28. In a post-hoc analysis, etravirine C(max) was higher, minimum plasma concentration was lower and AUC was similar when compared with etravirine 200 mg twice daily.. Addition of darunavir/ritonavir to etravirine, all dosed once daily, did not have a clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of etravirine. Findings support further investigation of etravirine 400 mg once daily in HIV-1-infected patients. (Trial registration number NCT00534352.).

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Deoxycytidine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Organophosphonates; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

HIV-1 RNA level and darunavir concentration in the genital tract were measured in 45 men receiving darunavir-ritonavir mono- or tritherapy. At week 48, a low frequency (3/45) of HIV-1 RNA shedding was observed in patients (1 on monotherapy and 2 on triple therapy), although they had undetectable HIV-1 RNA in plasma. The median darunavir seminal plasma concentration was close to the blood plasma free fraction, demonstrating a good penetration of darunavir into the male genital tract.

Topics: Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Plasma; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Semen; Sulfonamides

ANRS 139 TRIO trial was a phase II noncomparative trial that evaluated in highly experienced patients, a combination of raltegravir, etravirine and darunavir boosted with ritonavir. We analyzed emergence of resistant viruses at the time of virological failure and investigated the impact of baseline integrase polymorphisms on virological failure occurrence.. Bulk sequencing of protease, reverse transcriptase and integrase genes was performed for 103 patients at baseline and 14 patients at the time of virological failure. Additionally, integrase clonal analyses were performed at baseline and at virological failure in patients with successful integrase gene amplification. Impact of baseline integrase polymorphisms on virological failure occurrence was analyzed using Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests.. In the 14 failing patients median viral load at virological failure was 90 copies/ml (interquartile range = 60-783). Emergence of darunavir and etravirine resistance mutations was observed at virological failure in only one and three patients, respectively. Raltegravir resistance mutations were found neither at baseline nor at the time of virologic failure. Integrase clonal analyses showed neither the presence nor the selection of minority variants carrying raltegravir resistance mutations at baseline or at virological failure. No impact of baseline integrase polymorphisms was observed on virological failure either at week 24 or at week 48.. Virological failure occurred in a small proportion of patients with low viral load. No raltegravir resistance mutations were observed using bulk sequencing or clonal analyses, and darunavir and etravirine resistance-associated mutations were detected in only one and three patients, respectively at virological failure. No impact of baseline integrase polymorphism was observed on virological failure occurrence.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Darunavir/ritonavir (darunavir/r) maintenance strategy, in patients with suppressed HIV RNA viremia, is a potential long-term strategy to avoid nucleoside analogue toxicities and to reduce costs.. MONOtherapy Inhibitor protease is a prospective, open-label, noninferiority, 96-week safety and efficacy trial in virologically suppressed patients on triple therapy who were randomized to a darunavir/r triple drug regimen or darunavir/r monotherapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV RNA less than 400 copies/ml at week 48; treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA more than 400 copies/ml (time to loss of virologic response) or any change in treatment. The trial had 80% power to show noninferiority for the monotherapy arm (delta =-10%, 90% confidence interval).. A total of 242 patients were screened, 225 of whom were randomized. In the per protocol efficacy analysis, treatment success was 99% on darunavir/r triple drug versus 94% on darunavir/r monotherapy (delta = -4.9%, 90% confidence interval, from -9.1 to -0.8). Similar results were found in intent-to-treat population (92 versus 87.5%, delta = -4.5%, 90% confidence interval from -11.2 to 2.1). Three patients experienced virologic failure on darunavir/monotherapy and none on darunavir/r triple drug. No resistance to protease inhibitor emerged in patients with plasma viral load above 50 copies/ml. The two groups did not differ in the number of serious adverse events.. Darunavir/r monotherapy exhibited efficacy rate over 85% with concordant results in the magnitude of difference with darunavir/r triple drug regimen in both intent-to-treat and per protocol analyses, but discordant conclusions with respect to the noninferiority margin. Patients failing on darunavir/r monotherapy had no emergence of new darunavir resistance mutations preserving future treatment options.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; France; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Long-term side-effects and cost of HIV treatment motivate the development of simplified maintenance. Monotherapy with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r-MT) is the most widely studied strategy. However, efficacy of LPV/r-MT in compartments remains to be shown.. Randomized controlled open-label trial comparing LPV/r-MT with continued treatment for 48 weeks in treated patients with fully suppressed viral load. The primary endpoint was treatment failure in the central nervous system [cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)] and/or genital tract. Treatment failure in blood was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels more than 400 copies/ml.. The trial was prematurely stopped when six patients on monotherapy (none in continued treatment-arm) demonstrated a viral failure in blood. At study termination, 60 patients were included, 29 randomized to monotherapy and 13 additional patients switched from continued treatment to monotherapy after 48 weeks. All failures occurred in patients with a nadir CD4 cell count below 200/microl and within the first 24 weeks of monotherapy. Among failing patients, all five patients with a lumbar puncture had an elevated HIV RNA load in CSF and four of six had neurological symptoms. Viral load was fully resuppressed in all failing patients after resumption of the original combination therapy. No drug resistant virus was found. The only predictor of failure was low nadir CD4 cell count (P < 0.02).. Maintenance of HIV therapy with LPV/r alone should not be recommended as a standard strategy; particularly not in patients with a CD4 cell count nadir less than 200/microl. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the role of the central nervous system compartment in monotherapy-failure.

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Semen; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

Pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and transdermally delivered ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norelgestromin (NGMN) are unknown.. Using a standard noncompartmental PK analysis, we compared EE area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) and NGMN AUC during transdermal contraceptive patch administration in HIV-1-infected women on stable LPV/r to a control group of women not on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In addition, EE AUC after a single dose of a combination oral contraceptive pill including EE and norethindrone was measured before patch placement and was compared with patch EE AUC in both groups. Contraceptive effects on LPV/r PKs were estimated by measuring LPV/r AUC at baseline and during week 3 of patch administration.. Eight women on LPV/r, and 24 women in the control group were enrolled. Patch EE median AUC0-168 h was 45% lower at 6010.36 pg·h·mL in those on LPV/r versus 10911.42 pg·h·mL in those on no HAART (P = 0.064). Pill EE median AUC0-48 hours was similarly 55% lower at 344.67 pg·h·mL in those on LPV/r versus 765.38 pg·h·mL in those on no HAART (P = 0.003). Patch NGMN AUC0-168 h however, was 138.39 ng·h·mL, 83% higher in the LPV/r group compared with the control AUC of 75.63 ng·h·mL (P = 0.036). After 3 weeks on the patch, LPV AUC0-8 h decreased by 19%, (P = 0.156).. Although PKs of contraceptive EE and NGMN are significantly altered with LPV/r, the contraceptive efficacy of the patch is likely to be maintained. Larger studies are indicated to fully assess contraceptive efficacy versus risks of the transdermal contraceptive patch when co-administered with protease inhibitors.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Contraceptives, Oral, Combined; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Estrogens; Ethinyl Estradiol; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Middle Aged; Norgestrel; Oximes; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Transdermal Patch; United States

We evaluated a monotherapy maintenance regimen with lopinavir/ritonavir versus continuing current combined antiretroviral treatment (cART) in HIV patients with suppressed plasma HIV-1 RNA.. This was an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre trial in 23 sites in France. Adults were randomized if they had no history of virological failure while receiving a protease inhibitor, maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for at least 6 months and did not change cART during the last 3 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 (non-inferiority margin set at -12%) with missing data and treatment modification considered as failure. The trial has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT00140751.. At Week 48, 84% (73/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group met the primary endpoint compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group [difference, -4.0%, lower limit of 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) for difference, -12.4%]. In secondary analysis with success defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL, 87% (76/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group were virologically suppressed compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group (difference, -0.5%, lower limit of 90% two-sided CI for difference, -8.5%). If antiretroviral treatment intensification was taken into account, 91% (79/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group met the primary endpoint compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group (difference, +2.9%, lower limit of 90% two-sided CI for difference, -4.5%). Failures of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy did not show acquired resistance mutations in the protease gene.. Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy did not achieve non-inferiority versus cART for maintaining plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. Nevertheless, the incidence of virological failure was low (mostly with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL) and easily managed by treatment intensification.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Female; France; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Antiretroviral treatment (ART) significantly reduces cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HIV-1 RNA levels and residual viremia is less frequently found in CSF than in blood. However, persistent intrathecal immunoactivation is common, even after several years of ART. To investigate whether low-level CSF viremia and residual immunoactivation within the central nervous system (CNS) derive from ongoing local viral replication, we conducted a study of treatment intensification in patients on effective ART.. Ten patients on ART with plasma HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter for >18 months were included. Intensification was given for in total 8 weeks: 4 weeks with maraviroc or lopinavir/ritonavir (good CNS penetration), and 4 weeks with enfuvirtide (poor CNS penetration). Lumbar punctures were performed 4 weeks before, at intensification commencement, at switchover after 4 weeks, at the conclusion of, and 4 weeks after the intensification period.. No significant changes in HIV RNA, neopterin, β2-microglobulin, immunoglobulin G index, albumin ratio, and CD4(+) T-cell count were observed, either in CSF or blood, neither before, during, nor after the intensification periods.. ART intensification did not reduce residual CSF HIV RNA levels or intrathecal immunoactivation in patients on ART. These findings do not support an ongoing viral replication in CNS.

Topics: Adult; Albumins; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Central Nervous System Infections; Cross-Over Studies; Cyclohexanes; Enfuvirtide; Female; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Lopinavir; Male; Maraviroc; Middle Aged; Neopterin; Peptide Fragments; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Triazoles; Viral Load; Viremia; Virus Replication

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the antiretroviral agent etravirine were evaluated in two phase III clinical trials. Pharmacokinetic data were available in 577 patients randomized to receive etravirine. The mean (SD) population-pharmacokinetics-derived area under the concentration-time curve at 12 h (AUC(12 h)) and concentration at 0 h (C(0 h)) were 5,501 (4,544) ng·h/ml and 393 (378) ng/ml, respectively. Hepatitis C coinfection raised etravarine exposure, and concomitant use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate lowered etravirine exposure, but these changes were not considered clinically relevant. Etravirine apparent oral clearance was not affected by age, weight, sex, race, hepatitis B coinfection status, creatinine clearance, or concomitant use of enfuvirtide. Virologic response (<50 copies/ml) at week 24 was 59% in patients randomized to etravirine vs. 41% in those receiving placebo (P < 0.0001). There was no apparent relationship between etravirine pharmacokinetics and either efficacy or safety. Factors other than the pharmacokinetics of etravirine such as the characteristics of the patients and the disease, as well as characteristics of the treatment regimen, predict virologic response.

Topics: Adenine; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Darunavir; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Organophosphonates; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

Peripartum administration of single-dose nevirapine reduces mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) but selects for nevirapine-resistant virus.. In seven African countries, women infected with HIV-1 whose CD4+ T-cell counts were below 200 per cubic millimeter and who either had or had not taken single-dose nevirapine at least 6 months before enrollment were randomly assigned to receive antiretroviral therapy with tenofovir–emtricitabine plus nevirapine or tenofovir-emtricitabine plus lopinavir boosted by a low dose of ritonavir. The primary end point was the time to confirmed virologic failure or death.. A total of 241 women who had been exposed to single-dose nevirapine began the study treatments (121 received nevirapine and 120 received ritonavir-boosted lopinavir). Significantly more women in the nevirapine group reached the primary end point than in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group (26% vs. 8%) (adjusted P=0.001). Virologic failure occurred in 37 (28 in the nevirapine group and 9 in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group), and 5 died without prior virologic failure (4 in the nevirapine group and 1 in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group). The group differences appeared to decrease as the interval between single-dose nevirapine exposure and the start of antiretroviral therapy increased. Retrospective bulk sequencing of baseline plasma samples showed nevirapine resistance in 33 of 239 women tested (14%). Among 500 women without prior exposure to single-dose nevirapine, 34 of 249 in the nevirapine group (14%) and 36 of 251 in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group (14%) had virologic failure or died.. In women with prior exposure to peripartum single-dose nevirapine (but not in those without prior exposure), ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus tenofovir–emtricitabine was superior to nevirapine plus tenofovir–emtricitabine for initial antiretroviral therapy. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Research Center; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00089505.).

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Deoxycytidine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Linear Models; Lopinavir; Nevirapine; Organophosphonates; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Statistics, Nonparametric; Tenofovir; Treatment Failure; Young Adult

Single-dose nevirapine is the cornerstone of the regimen for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in resource-limited settings, but nevirapine frequently selects for resistant virus in mothers and children who become infected despite prophylaxis. The optimal antiretroviral treatment strategy for children who have had prior exposure to single-dose nevirapine is unknown.. We conducted a randomized trial of initial therapy with zidovudine and lamivudine plus either nevirapine or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in HIV-infected children 6 to 36 months of age, in six African countries, who qualified for treatment according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Results are reported for the cohort that included children exposed to single-dose nevirapine prophylaxis. The primary end point was virologic failure or discontinuation of treatment by study week 24. Enrollment in this cohort was terminated early on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board.. A total of 164 children were enrolled. The median percentage of CD4+ lymphocytes was 19%; a total of 56% of the children had WHO stage 3 or 4 disease. More children in the nevirapine group than in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir group reached a primary end point (39.6% vs. 21.7%; weighted difference, 18.6 percentage-points; 95% confidence interval, 3.7 to 33.6; nominal P=0.02). Baseline resistance to nevirapine was detected in 18 of 148 children (12%) and was predictive of treatment failure. No significant between-group differences were seen in the rate of adverse events.. Among children with prior exposure to single-dose nevirapine for perinatal prevention of HIV transmission, antiretroviral treatment consisting of zidovudine and lamivudine plus ritonavir-boosted lopinavir resulted in better outcomes than did treatment with zidovudine and lamivudine plus nevirapine. Since nevirapine is used for both treatment and perinatal prevention of HIV infection in resource-limited settings, alternative strategies for the prevention of HIV transmission from mother to child, as well as for the treatment of HIV infection, are urgently required. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00307151.).

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lopinavir; Male; Nevirapine; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Failure

Triple combination therapy based on a ritonavir (RTV)-boosted protease inhibitor plus two nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) has improved outcomes in HIV type-1 (HIV-1)-infected patients. For patients unable to tolerate these regimens, alternative therapeutic approaches are needed.. We report a comparative, open-label study in treatment-naive patients who underwent initial induction treatment with a triple combination including RTV-boosted atazanavir (ATV; 300/100 mg once daily). Patients who achieved an HIV-1 viral load <50 copies/ml after the induction period were then randomized in the maintenance phase either to continue on current treatment or to switch to unboosted ATV 400 mg once daily (plus two NRTIs unchanged).. A total of 252 patients entered the induction phase, of whom 172 were eligible for randomization in the maintenance phase (ATV/RTV n=85 and ATV n=87). The unboosted ATV regimen demonstrated non-inferior efficacy to the ATV/RTV regimen with 78% and 75% of patients, respectively, maintaining virological suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml) up to week 48 after randomization (difference estimate 2.9, 95% confidence interval -9.8-15.5). Time to virological failure and change from the end of the induction phase in mean CD4(+) T-cell counts were also similar between the treatment arms. Although both regimens were well-tolerated, unboosted ATV was associated with fewer adverse events, fewer total bilirubin abnormalities and an improved lipid profile compared with ATV/RTV.. An HIV-1 combined treatment regimen based on unboosted ATV is a feasible treatment option for patients with established virological control who are unable to tolerate triple combination therapy including ATV/RTV.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Random Allocation; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load; Virus Replication; Young Adult

Durable efficacy and long-term safety of antiretroviral therapy are important goals in the management of treatment-experienced patients. The 96-week efficacy and safety of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) etravirine were evaluated in the Phase III DUET trials.. HIV type-1-infected treatment-experienced adults with viral loads >5,000 copies/ml and NNRTI and protease inhibitor resistance were randomized to receive etravirine 200 mg or placebo, each twice daily and in combination with a background regimen of darunavir/ritonavir twice daily, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors and optional enfuvirtide. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with viral load <50 copies/ml (intent-to-treat analysis, time-to-loss of virological response algorithm) at week 24. Results from both trials were combined in the pre-specified pooled 96-week analysis.. In total, 599 patients received etravirine and 604 received placebo. At week 96, 57% of patients in the etravirine group versus 36% in the placebo group had a viral load <50 copies/ml (P<0.0001); 91% and 88% of patients, respectively, had maintained this response from week 48. Mean increases in CD4(+) T-cell count from baseline at week 96 were 128 cells/mm(3) with etravirine versus 86 cells/mm(3) with placebo (P<0.0001). With the exception of rash, which was reported more frequently with etravirine than placebo (21% versus 12%, respectively; P<0.0001), the safety and tolerability profile of etravirine was similar to placebo over the treatment period.. Etravirine, in combination with an antiretroviral background regimen, provided durable virological and immunological responses with no new safety concerns in treatment-experienced patients over 96 weeks in the DUET trials.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Double-Blind Method; Enfuvirtide; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Nitriles; Peptide Fragments; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Treatment options for HIV-infected patients can be limited due to viral drug resistance to antiretroviral agents. Enfuvirtide (ENF) is an injectable entry/fusion inhibitor that is effective in achieving viral suppression when used in combination with protease inhibitors (PIs) in patients with pre-existing resistance. However, ENF treatment is associated with injection site reactions and dosing fatigue. This multicenter, open-label, Phase IIIb, 48-week pilot study assessed safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of the PI darunavir (DRV), boosted with ritonavir (DRV/r), and the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) etravirine (ETR), when substituted for ENF/PI (±NNRTI)-based therapy. Ten virologically suppressed (HIV RNA less than 50 copies/ml) men who were intolerant to ENF were enrolled. Median (range) CD4+ count was 301 (187-663) cells/mm(3). Two patients discontinued the study; all remaining patients maintained a viral load of less than 50 copies/ml at Week 48. Viral load increased to greater than 50 copies/ml in two patients, but was eventually re-suppressed without the need for changes in treatment. Median (range) increase (last observation carried forward) in CD4+ count from baseline to Week 48 was 64 (-53-100) cells/mm(3). Two grade 3 adverse events (AEs), nausea and weight loss, and one serious AE, acute cholecystitis, were reported; each AE resolved without treatment interruption. Most common AEs related to study drug were fatigue, rash, headache, and diarrhea. Decreases in triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein, were observed. This study suggests that a DRV/r- and ETR-based regimen can be substituted for an ENF-based regimen while maintaining virologic suppression.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Enfuvirtide; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Peptide Fragments; Pilot Projects; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Antiretroviral therapy is associated with metabolic complications, including dyslipidaemia, body fat changes and insulin resistance. Healthy volunteer studies have demonstrated a decrease in glucose disposal associated with dosing with specific antiretrovirals.. HIV-type-1-positive male participants were randomized to receive tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and lamivudine, with either fosamprenavir (FPV)/ritonavir or lopinavir (LPV)/ritonavir twice daily. A hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp was performed at baseline and at 2 weeks after commencing treatment. The homeostasis model assessment index for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was also calculated at these time points. Changes in lipids and lipoprotein subfractions (by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy) were assessed. A pharmacokinetic assessment was undertaken at week 2.. A total of 27 participants were enrolled. There was no significant change in whole-body insulin sensitivity or HOMA-IR from baseline or between groups. Total cholesterol increased significantly, by 6.6% with FPV and 10.9% with LPV. The changes in lipids and lipoprotein subfractions were similar between groups with increases in triglycerides, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and chylomicrons, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles. Although the total high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles were not significantly altered, a decrease in small HDL particles was seen. Changes in VLDL and chylomicron particles in both groups and triglycerides and small HDL particles in the LPV group were statistically significant.. In HIV-type-1-positive men initiating antiretroviral therapy with FPV- or LPV-based regimens, there were no significant changes in whole-body insulin sensitivity after 2 weeks. A proatherogenic lipid profile characterized by increases in triglycerides, VLDL and chylomicron particles and LDL particles, and a decrease in small HDL particles, was observed in both groups.

Topics: Adenine; Adipose Tissue; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Blood Glucose; Carbamates; Confidence Intervals; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Dyslipidemias; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Lamivudine; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Organophosphates; Organophosphonates; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir

Very few studies have evaluated the cost of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) per successful treatment in HIV-infected patients.. To evaluate the cost of achieving undetectable plasma HIV-RNA levels in highly treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected adults receiving darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r 600 mg/100 mg twice a day) or control protease inhibitor (PI)-based HAART.. The mean annual per-patient cost of DRV/r and control PI-based HAART was determined from the proportional use of antiretroviral agents in the DRV/r and control PI arms of the pooled POWER 1 and 2 trials, applying drug acquisition costs for 13 healthcare settings. The mean annual cost per patient of achieving undetectable plasma HIV-RNA levels (<50 copies/mL) was calculated by dividing the cost of each treatment by the proportion of patients with undetectable plasma HIV-RNA levels after 48 weeks in the DRV/r (45%) and control PI (10%) arms of the POWER trials.. Whereas absolute costs of treatment were 1-19% higher with DRV/r versus control PI-based HAART depending on the healthcare setting, the mean annual per-patient cost of achieving undetectable plasma HIV-RNA levels was 73-78% lower. These cost savings were maintained in the sensitivity analyses, adjusting for control PI and enfuvirtide use, and the number of active drugs in the background regimen. The incremental annual cost per additional patient achieving undetectable plasma HIV-RNA levels with DRV/r versus control PI-based HAART in POWER 1 and 2 (£4148) compared favourably with that determined for enfuvirtide (£137, 740; TORO trials) and tipranavir/ritonavir (£32,176; RESIST) versus control therapy.. DRV/r-based HAART provided consistent reductions in the cost of achieving undetectable plasma HIV-RNA levels compared with control PI-based therapy in highly treatment-experienced patients across various healthcare settings. The incremental cost per additional patient achieving undetectable plasma HIV-RNA levels with DRV/r versus control PI-based HAART was also lower than that calculated for other treatment options in this population. These results suggest that DRV/r is an economically viable option for highly treatment-experienced patients.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; Drug Costs; Europe; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Protease Inhibitors; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Saquinavir, a potent human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor, is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. Saquinavir is coadministered with ritonavir, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, to boost its exposure. Ketoconazole is a potent CYP3A inhibitor. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir/ritonavir and vice versa using the approved dosage regimens of saquinavir/ritonavir at 1,000/100 mg twice daily and ketoconazole at 200 mg once daily. This was an open-label, randomized two-arm, one-sequence, two-period crossover study in healthy subjects. In study arm 1, 20 subjects received saquinavir/ritonavir treatment alone for 14 days, followed in combination with ketoconazole treatment for 14 days. In arm 2, 12 subjects received ketoconazole treatment for 6 days, followed in combination with saquinavir/ritonavir treatment for 14 days. The pharmacokinetics were assessed on the last day of each treatment (days 14 and 28 in arm 1 and days 6 and 20 in arm 2). The exposures C(max) and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) of saquinavir and ritonavir with or without ketoconazole were not substantially altered after 2 weeks of concomitant dosing with ketoconazole. The C(max) and AUC(0-12) of ketoconazole, dosed at 200 mg once daily, were increased by 45% (90% confidence interval = 32 to 59%) and 168% (90% confidence interval = 146 to 193%), respectively, after 2 weeks of concomitant dosing with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (1,000 mg of saquinavir/100 mg of ritonavir given twice daily). The greater exposure to ketoconazole when given in combination with saquinavir/ritonavir was not associated with unacceptable safety or tolerability. No dose adjustment for saquinavir/ritonavir (1,000/100 mg twice daily) is required when coadministered with 200 mg of ketoconazole once daily, and high doses of ketoconazole (>200 mg/day) are not recommended.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antifungal Agents; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Interactions; Female; Half-Life; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Ketoconazole; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Young Adult

The aim of this work is to: (1) assess therapeutic drug monitoring of indinavir (IDV) during clinical routine practice in HIV-infected children, whose antiretroviral treatment includes IDV boosted with ritonavir (RTV), and (2) describe a possible relationship between IDV pharmacokinetics and MDR1 genotypes. In 21 ambulatory pediatric patients receiving IDV plus RTV, IDV plasma levels and MDR1 genotypes on exon 26 (C3435T) were determined. Nine of the 21 patients initially receiving 250 mg/m(2) IDV yielded trough levels below 0.10 microg/ml (median: 0.21, range: 0.04-1.31 microg/ml). When the dosage was increased to 400 mg/m(2) IDV plus 100 mg/m(2) RTV b.i.d., all, except 1 patient, achieved levels above 0.10 microg/ml. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed higher volume of distribution median values related to the C/C genotype in comparison with C/T or T/T genotypes for exon 26 (4.57 vs. 1.20 and 1.50 l/kg, respectively; p = 0.002). Although a higher median value of clearance was observed with the C/C genotype, the difference was not statistically significant (1.43 vs. 0.27 and 0.42 l/h, respectively; p = 0.052). These results may be explained by a reduced absorption of the drug, related with lower plasma IDV levels in patients carrying the C/C genotype in exon 26.

Topics: Adolescent; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Child; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exons; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Polymorphism, Genetic; Ritonavir; Tissue Distribution

The pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) 300 mg/m twice daily and efavirenz (EFV) 350 mg/m once daily were evaluated in HIV-infected children. The minimum concentrations for LPV contained values above the target range, and the estimated minimum concentrations for EFV contained values below the range. Our data support the current LPV/RTV dose, but EFV 350 mg/m may not be sufficient.

Topics: Adolescent; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Child; Child, Preschool; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Gender-related differences in the efficacy and safety of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir [tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) 500/200 mg twice daily (b.i.d.)] were evaluated in a subanalysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in Multidrug Resistant Patients with Tipranavir (RESIST) trials. Data from HIV-1-infected women (203; TPV/r = 117) and men (1280; TPV/r = 629) showed no significant gender-related differences in HIV RNA response rates (at 48 weeks) and safety (at 96 weeks) despite higher mean steady-state plasma TPV trough concentrations in women. Significantly greater increases in CD4 cell count (+81.2 vs. +48.6; P = 0.0012) were observed in women at week 48.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sex Factors; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Guidelines recommend that when soft-gelatin capsules of lopinavir/ritonavir are co-administered with CYP3A4-inducing agents, doses should be increased to 4 capsules (533 mg/133 mg) twice daily. No evidence is available to guide dosing of lopinavir/ritonavir in tablet formulation in this setting. A single-center study is conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics of high-dose lopinavir/ritonavir in 34 patients on stable HAART regimens including 4 soft-gelatin capsules twice daily who then switch to 3 tablets (600 mg/150 mg) twice daily. Median C(min) on soft-gelatin capsule and tablets is 4700 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 2310, 6000 ng/mL) and 5640 ng/mL (IQR 4290, 8080 ng/mL), respectively, for those on inducing agents (n = 17). For patients not on inducing agents (n = 17), median C(min) on soft-gelatin capsule and tablets is 5170 ng/mL (IQR 3640, 6210 ng/mL) and 5640 ng/mL (IQR 4290, 8080 ng/mL), respectively. Among treatment-experienced patients on lopinavir/ritonavir capsules 533/133 mg twice daily, a switch to tablets 600/150 mg twice daily produces comparable pharmacokinetics, regardless of whether they receive concomitant CYP3A4-inducing antiretroviral agents.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Capsules; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Induction; Female; Gelatin; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Tablets

Simplified maintenance therapy with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/RTV) alone is attractive because of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing benefits, low pill burden, once-daily dosage, and safety.. Subjects with virologic suppression after > or = 48 weeks of initial antiretroviral therapy with 2 NRTIs and a protease inhibitor (PI) were enrolled. Subjects switched to ATV/RTV at entry and discontinued NRTIs after 6 weeks. The primary end point was time to virologic failure (confirmed HIV-1 RNA level > or = 200 copies/mL). Drug resistance at virologic failure was evaluated by standard genotyping and single-genome sequencing (SGS). Residual viremia (1.1-49 copies/mL) was measured by single-copy assay.. Thirty-four subjects simplified to ATV/RTV alone, of whom 30 (88%) did not experience virologic failure by 48 weeks after simplification. Residual viremia did not change significantly after NRTI discontinuation among those without virologic failure but did increase 4-12 weeks before confirmed virologic failure. No major PI-resistance mutations were identified at virologic failure by standard genotyping or SGS.. In this pilot study, simplified maintenance therapy with ATV/RTV alone maintained viral suppression in most subjects through 48 weeks. PI resistance was not detected among subjects experiencing virologic failure. Larger, randomized trials are warranted to further define the efficacy and safety of this strategy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pilot Projects; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viremia; Young Adult

Preliminary studies suggest that the new film-coated tablet formulation of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r-fct) could cut down the rate of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms of the conventional lopinavir/ritonavir soft gelatine capsules (LPV/r-sgc).. To ascertain the difference in the rate of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms in patients who switch from LPV/r-sgc to LPV/r-fct.. An uncontrolled, open, prospective study including a pre/post comparison using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) modified to the characteristics of the protease inhibitors.. Seventy patients were included, with a mean time of treatment, with the new formulation of 77 days [confidence interval (CI) 95%: 70 to 84]. The total GSRS score was 26.96 (CI 95%: 25.02 to 28.89) in the prechange survey and 26.27 (CI 95%: 24.08 to 28.47) in the postchange survey, with a mean difference of 0.69 points (CI 95%: -1.18 to 2.55, P = 0.47). None of the questions obtained the objective of a difference of at least 2 points, previously set as a clinically significant difference. Only 1 patient dropped the study due to gastrointestinal toxicity.. Our study has unearthed no clinically significant differences in the gastrointestinal tolerance profile of (LPV/r-sgc) and (LPV/r-fct), measuring this tolerance level by application of the GSRS scale.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Drug Combinations; Female; Gastrointestinal Tract; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

This phase IIb study explored the antiviral activity and safety of the investigational CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) antagonist aplaviroc (APL) in antiretroviral-naïve patients harbouring R5- or R5X4-tropic virus.. A total of 191 patients were randomized 2:2:2:1 to one of three APL dosing regimens or to lamivudine (3TC)/zidovudine (ZDV) twice daily (bid), each in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 400 mg/100 mg bid. Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed.. This study was terminated prematurely because of APL-associated idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. A total of 141 patients initiated treatment early enough to have been able to complete 12 weeks on treatment [modified intent-to-treat (M-ITT) population]; of these, 133 completed the 12-week treatment phase. The proportion of subjects in the M-ITT population with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL at week 12 was 50, 48, 54 and 75% in the APL 200 mg bid, APL 400 mg bid, APL 800 mg once a day (qd) and 3TC/ZDV arms, respectively. Similar responses were seen in the few subjects harbouring R5X4-tropic virus (n=17). Common clinical adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea, nausea, fatigue and headache. APL demonstrated nonlinear pharmacokinetics with high interpatient variability.. While target plasma concentrations of APL were achieved, the antiviral activity of APL+LPV/r did not appear to be comparable to that of 3TC/ZDV+LPV/r.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzoates; Diketopiperazines; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Pyrimidinones; Receptors, CCR5; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Spiro Compounds; Young Adult

With increasing recognition of the benefits of early antiretroviral therapy initiation in perinatally HIV-infected infants, data are needed regarding the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of recommended first-line protease inhibitors such as lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r).. A prospective, phase I/II, open-label, dose-finding trial evaluated LPV/r at a dose of 300/75 mg/m twice daily plus 2 nucleoside analogs in HIV-1-infected infants > or =14 days to <6 weeks of age. Intensive 12-hour PK evaluations were performed after 2 weeks of LPV/r therapy, and doses were modified to maintain LPV predose concentrations >1 microg/mL and area under the curve (AUC) <170 microg hr/mL.. Ten infants enrolled [median age 5.7 (range, 3.6-5.9) weeks] with median HIV-1 RNA of 6.0 (range, 4.7-7.2) log10 copies/mL; all completed 24 weeks of follow-up. Nine completed the intensive PK evaluation at a median LPV dose of 267 (range, 246-305) mg/m q12 hours; median measures were AUC = 36.6 (range, 27.9-62.6) microg hr/mL; predose concentration = 2.2 (range, 0.99-4.9) microg/mL; maximum concentration = 4.76 (range, 2.84-7.28) microg/mL and apparent clearance (L/h/m) = 6.75 (range, 2.79-12.83). Adverse events were limited to transient grade 3 neutropenia in 3 subjects. By week 24, 2 of 10 subjects had experienced a protocol-defined virologic failure.. Although the LPV AUC in this population was significantly lower than that observed in infants ages 6 weeks to 6 months, LPV/r-based antiretroviral therapy in doses of 300/75 mg/m BID was well tolerated and resulted in virologic control in 8 of 10 infants by 24 weeks. Additional investigation is needed to understand the long-term implications of the lower LPV exposure in this age group.

Topics: Area Under Curve; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The use of protease inhibitors (PI) has led to a decrease in HIV-1-related mortality and morbidity. The objective of this study was to collect safety data on treatment with fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FPV/r) 700/100mg BID in HIV-infected patients through an expanded access program.. Prospective, multicenter, noncomparative study in HIV-1 infected adults, for whom a regimen containing FPV/r 700/100mg BID was appropriate.. A total of 678 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and safety population. The on-treatment (OT) population contained 587 patients: 76% male, 98% Caucasian, and median age 41 years. Median CD4 cell count was 351 cells/microL, HIV-RNA was 3 log copies/mL, and 49% of patients were in CDC class C. After 24 weeks of treatment, serum viral load decreased a median of 1.3 log copies/mL and 73% of patients had <400 copies/mL (P<.0001 vs. baseline); 48-week results were similar. CD4 cell count increased a median of 49 and 62 cells/microL at 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) associated with the study medication occurred in 21% of patients.. Ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir as part of antiretroviral therapy is a potent, safe treatment in real-life clinical circumstances.

Topics: Adult; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Comorbidity; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Furans; Gastrointestinal Diseases; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypertriglyceridemia; Male; Organophosphates; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Spain; Sulfonamides; Viral Load; Viremia

Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-dosed twice daily has demonstrated durable efficacy in antiretroviral-naive and protease inhibitor (PI) -experienced patients. Study M05-730 compared LPV/r tablets dosed once daily vs. twice daily in antiretroviral-naive subjects.. Six hundred sixty-four subjects were randomized to LPV/r soft gel capsules (SGCs) once daily, SGC twice daily, tablets once daily, and tablets twice daily, all with tenofovir and emtricitabine once daily. At week 8, all SGC-treated subjects were switched to tablets, maintaining randomized dose frequency. The primary efficacy analysis used an intent-to-treat, noncompleter = failure approach to assess noninferiority of the LPV/r once-daily group compared with the twice-daily group.. At week 48, 77% of once-daily-dosed subjects vs. 76% of twice-daily-dosed subjects had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter (P = 0.715; 95% confidence interval for difference: 5% to 8%). Response rates were numerically similar between the once-daily and twice-daily groups among subjects with baseline HIV-1 RNA > or = 100,000 copies per milliliter (75% once daily vs. 74.6% twice daily; P > 0.999) or when analyzed by baseline CD4+ T-cell count (<50, 50 to <200, and > or = 200 cells/mm3). Rates of discontinuation and adverse events, including diarrhea, were similar between arms. Among subjects with protocol-defined virologic rebound through week 48, no new PI resistance mutations were detected.. At 48 weeks, the antiviral response in the LPV/r once-daily group was noninferior to the twice-daily group when coadministered with tenofovir and emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive subjects. Efficacy was comparable between the once-daily and twice-daily groups regardless of baseline HIV-1 RNA or CD4+ T-cell count. Safety and tolerability of once-daily and twice-daily dosing was also comparable. No new PI resistance mutations were detected upon virologic rebound.

Topics: Adult; Capsules; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Tablets

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Nevirapine; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Viral Load; Zidovudine

Previous work has demonstrated the existence of systemic interaction between tenofovir (TFV) disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and didanosine as well as between TDF and lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r). Here we investigated TDF interactions with the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) lamivudine (3TC) and abacavir (ABC), comparing both the concentrations of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in plasma and the intracellular concentrations of their triphosphate metabolites (NRTI-TP) for human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving these NRTIs with TDF and after 4 weeks of TDF interruption. We also looked at interactions between TDF-ABC and LPV/r, comparing patients receiving or not receiving LPV/r. Blood samples were taken at baseline and at 1, 2, and 4 h after dosing. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure NRTIs and NRTI-TPs. Statistical analyses were performed on pharmacokinetic parameters: the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 h (AUC(0-4)), the maximum concentration of the drug (C(max)), and the residual concentration of the drug at the end of the dosing interval (C(trough)) for plasma and the AUC(0-4) and C(trough) for intracellular data. Among the groups of patient discontinuing TDF, the very long intracellular half-life of elimination (150 h) of TFV-DP (the diphosphorylated metabolite of TFV, corresponding to a triphosphorylated species) was confirmed. Comparison between groups as well as the longitudinal study showed no significant systemic or intracellular interaction between TDF and ABC or 3TC. Significant differences were observed between patients receiving LVP/r and those receiving nevirapine. For ABC, plasma exposure was decreased (40%) under LVP/r, while, in contrast, plasma exposure to TFV was increased by 50% and the intracellular TFV-DP AUC(0-4) was increased by 59%. A trend for a gender effect was observed for TFV-DP at the intracellular level, with higher and C(trough) values for women.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Longitudinal Studies; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Pilot Projects; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

Previous studies have demonstrated that lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy maintained plasma HIV-1 RNA suppression in a large proportion of antiretroviral naive subjects. However, more subjects receiving lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy experienced confirmed virologic rebound >50 copies/ml compared to a standard three-drug HAART regimen. In this study, we sought to determine the factors associated with maintenance of virologic suppression in subjects receiving lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy. Antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected volunteers were randomized 2:1 to initiate a lopinavir/ritonavir-based combination regimen followed by simplification to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy or an efavirenz-based triple combination therapy and followed for 96 weeks. Potential predictors of time to loss of virologic response included baseline demographics, baseline HIV-1 RNA levels, baseline CD4(+) T cell counts, adherence as determined by 4-day subject recall, duration of HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml prior to simplification, and lopinavir concentrations. By the Cox proportional hazards model, higher reported adherence levels and higher baseline CD4(+) T cell counts were associated with a greater likelihood of maintaining virologic suppression while receiving lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy. Lopinavir concentrations, including trough concentrations, were not significantly associated with virologic outcomes. This analysis suggests that adherence and higher baseline CD4(+) T cell counts may help to predict who will sustain virologic suppression with lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy. The data also suggest that measuring lopinavir concentrations is not useful in predicting virologic response in these patients.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Medication Adherence; Plasma; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Zidovudine

This 96-week, open-label, randomized study assessed changes in body composition in treatment-naive patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 who were treated with either atazanavir or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir, in combination with stavudine and lamivudine. Both treatment groups had similar increases in trunk fat, but patients treated with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir had a significantly lower incidence of lipoatrophy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Body Composition; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Stavudine

MONARK is a pilot randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy to a standard triple-drug regimen as initial therapy. The primary endpoint was virological response (VR) defined as viral load (VL)<400 copies/ml at week 24 and VL<50 copies/ml at week 48. The objective of this study was to determine prognostic factors of VR in patients receiving LPV/r monotherapy.. Baseline characteristics, including demographics, HIV type-1 (HIV-1) subtype (B versus non-B), early VR up to week 4, LPV trough concentrations and compliance were investigated as prognostic factors for VR in patients receiving LPV/r monotherapy. Logistic regression was used to search for variables significantly associated with the occurrence of VR.. VR was achieved in 53 out of 83 patients randomized to the LPV/r arm. The on-treatment analysis, using a multivariate model, indicated that having VL<400 copies/ml at week 4 and harbouring HIV-1 subtype B were independently associated with an increased probability of VR. No difference in early VL reduction was evidenced between patients harbouring B or non-B subtypes. The latter patients had more difficulty in adherence to therapy than the former patients. The intention-to-treat analysis showed similar results.. HIV-1 RNA measured at baseline or at week 4 and HIV-1 subtype (B versus non-B) were independent predictive factors of VR in patients starting therapy with LPV/r alone. Although based on a small sample size, results of this study showed that adherence to therapy is lower in patients harbouring non-B subtypes and appears to be a key factor of VR in the context of protease inhibitor monotherapy.

Topics: Adult; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Medication Adherence; Pilot Projects; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

SCH532706 is a novel small molecule chemokine receptor-5 (CCRS) antagonist with high in vitro potency (mean 90% inhibitory concentration [IC90] 0.15-7.0 nM) against diverse HIV type-1 (HIV-1) isolates.. A single arm study was undertaken to examine the safety, antiviral activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of 10 days of SCH532706 coadministered with ritonavir (RTV). The trial enrolled formerly treated (off therapy >3 months) or untreated HIV-1-infected patients.. The study enrolled 12 males with CD4+ T-cell count >100 cells/microl. Median (range) CD4+ T-cell count was 327 cells/microl (117-1008), HIV-1-RNA was 4.6 log10 copies/ml (3.8-5.5) and patients had phenotypically confirmed R5-tropic HIV-1 only. Mean (95% confidence interval) changes from baseline plasma HIV-1-RNA at days 10 and 15 (4 days off SCH532706) were -1.31 log10 copies/ml (-1.6 - -1.0) and -1.62 log10 copies/ml (-2.0 - -1.3), respectively. Day 10 median (range) time to maximum plasma concentration, mean (+/-SD) effective half-life and mean (+/-SD) trough concentration were 1.4 h (1.0-4.0), 39.4 h (+/-14.5) and 178 ng/ml (+/-34), respectively. All virus isolates remained R5-tropic pre-study, on study and at study end. There were no laboratory or QTc interval changes reportable as adverse events. In total, 11 patients reported > or =1 treatment emergent adverse event, most commonly gastrointestinal upset. One serious adverse event, pericarditis (grade 2), occurred 13 days after drug administration. It was considered to be possibly related to study drug.. Overall, SCH532706 with RTV was safe, generally well tolerated and active against HIV-1 over 10 days of dosing. In this setting, SCH532706 trough concentrations exceed the mean in vitro IC90 (1.1 ng/ml) by >30-fold (after correction for 80% plasma protein binding) and provide a PK rationale for the observed efficacy.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Administration, Oral; Adult; CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pericarditis; Ritonavir; Viral Load

The long-term efficacy of once-daily (qd) fosamprenavir (FPV) 1400 mg boosted by ritonavir 100 mg (FPV/r100) has not been evaluated previously. A 96-week open-label, randomized, multicenter study compared the efficacy/safety of FPV/r100 with FPV 1400 mg boosted by ritonavir 200 mg qd (FPV/r200), plus abacavir/lamivudine 600 mg/300 mg qd, in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL)> or =1000 copies/ml. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving VL <400 copies/ml or discontinuing for drug-related reasons. In the intent-to-treat:exposed (ITT-E) population, missing = failure (M = F), and observed approaches were used to assess between-arm differences in VL responses by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and CD4(+) count by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. One hundred and fifteen (115) patients enrolled, with 58 on FPV/r100 (median VL 4.7 log(10) copies/ml; CD4(+) count 259 cells/mm(3)) and 57 on FPV/r200 (median VL 4.9 log(10) copies/ml; CD4(+) count 179 cells/mm(3)). Fewer FPV/r100-treated patients discontinued treatment prematurely (12 vs. 24) and experienced virologic failure (5 vs. 8, none developing major protease inhibitor resistance mutations). At week 96, more FPV/r100-treated patients had VL <400 copies/ml [ITT-E,M = F: 78% (45/58) vs. 53% (30/57), p = 0.006; observed: 98% (45/46) vs. 94% (30/32)] and VL<50 copies/ml [ITT-E,M = F: 66% (38/58) vs. 53% (30/57); observed: 83% (38/46) vs. 94% (30/32)]. The FPV/r100 and FPV/r200 arms were similar at week 96 regarding median change from baseline in CD4(+) count (+265 vs. +260 cells/mm(3)) and total cholesterol (+33 vs. +35 mg/dl), and in total-cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol ratio (4.0 vs. 4.1) and type/frequency of treatment-related grade 2-4 adverse events, although FPV/r100 was associated with a lower elevation in triglycerides (+27 vs. +48 mg/dl). In conclusion, through 96 weeks, FPV/r100 was more effective and prompted less elevation in triglycerides than FPV/r200.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

The OK04 trial has shown that 48 weeks of lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy with reintroduction of nucleosides as needed was noninferior to continuation of triple therapy with 2 nucleosides and lopinavir-ritonavir in patients with prior stable suppression. However, it is still uncertain if this experimental strategy can maintain suppression in the long term.. Patients entered this noninferiority trial (upper limit 95% confidence interval: +12%) with no history of virological failure while receiving a protease inhibitor and receiving 2 nucleosides plus lopinavir/ritonavir, with HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter for more than 6 months. Primary end point was percent of patients without therapeutic failure, defined as confirmed HIV RNA >500 copies per milliliter with exclusion of monotherapy patients who resuppressed to <50 copies per milliliter after resuming baseline nucleosides, or loss to follow-up, or change of randomized therapy other than reinduction.. Through 96 weeks, percentage of patient without therapeutic failure was 87% (monotherapy, n = 100) vs. 78% (triple therapy, n = 98; 95% confidence interval: -20% to +1.2%). Percentage with HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter (intention to treat, missing = failure, reinduction = failure): 77% (monotherapy) vs. 78% (triple therapy). Low-level viral rebound was more frequent in the monotherapy group. Twelve patients in the monotherapy group (12%) needed reinduction with nucleosides. Discontinuations due to adverse events were significantly more frequent in the triple therapy group (8%) than in the monotherapy group (0%); P = 0.003.. At 96-week lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy with reintroduction of nucleosides as needed was noninferior to continuation of triple therapy. Incidence of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation was significantly lower with monotherapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114933).

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Middle Aged; Nucleosides; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Rifampin is a key drug in antituberculosis chemotherapy because it rapidly kills the majority of bacilli in tuberculosis lesions, prevents relapse and thus enables 6-month short-course chemotherapy. Little is known about the pharmacokinetics of rifampin in children. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of rifampin in children with tuberculosis, both human immunodeficiency virus type-1-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected.. Fifty-four children, 21 human immunodeficiency virus-infected and 33 human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected, mean ages 3.73 and 4.05 years (P = 0.68), respectively, admitted to a tuberculosis hospital in Cape Town, South Africa with severe forms of tuberculosis were studied approximately 1 month and 4 months after commencing antituberculosis treatment. Blood specimens for analysis were drawn in the morning, 45 minutes, 1.5, 3.0, 4.0 and 6.0 hours after dosing. Rifampin concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. For two sample comparisons of means, the Welch version of the t-test was used; associations between variables were examined by Pearson correlation and by multiple linear regression.. The children received a mean rifampin dosage of 9.61 mg/kg (6.47 to 15.58) body weight at 1 month and 9.63 mg/kg (4.63 to 17.8) at 4 months after commencing treatment administered as part of a fixed-dose formulation designed for paediatric use. The mean rifampin area under the curve 0 to 6 hours after dosing was 14.9 and 18.1 microg/hour/ml (P = 0.25) 1 month after starting treatment in human immunodeficiency virus-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected children, respectively, and 16.52 and 17.94 microg/hour/ml (P = 0.59) after 4 months of treatment. The mean calculated 2-hour rifampin concentrations in these human immunodeficiency virus-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected children were 3.9 and 4.8 microg/ml (P = 0.20) at 1 month after the start of treatment and 4.0 and 4.6 microg/ml (P = 0.33) after 4 months of treatment. These values are considerably less than the suggested lower limit for 2-hour rifampin concentrations in adults of 8.0 microg/ml and even 4 microg/ml. Both human immunodeficiency virus-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected children with tuberculosis have very low rifampin serum concentrations after receiving standard rifampin dosages similar to those used in adults. Pharmacokinetic studies of higher dosages of rifampin are urgently needed in children to assist in placing the dosage of rifampin used in childhood on a more scientific foundation.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Benzoxazines; C-Reactive Protein; Child; Child, Preschool; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

The metabolic effects of initial therapy for HIV-1 infection are important determinants of regimen selection.. Open-label study in 753 subjects randomized equally to efavirenz or lopinavir/ritonavir(r) plus two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) vs. the NRTI-sparing regimen of lopinavir/r plus efavirenz. Zidovudine, stavudine, or tenofovir with lamivudine was selected prior to randomization. Metabolic outcomes through 96 weeks were lipoatrophy, defined as at least 20% loss in extremity fat, and fasting serum lipids.. Lipoatrophy by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at week 96 occurred in 32% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25-39%] of subjects in the efavirenz plus two NRTIs arm, 17% (95% CI 12-24) in the lopinavir/r plus two NRTIs arm, and 9% (95% CI 5-14) in the NRTI-sparing arm (P < or = 0.023 for all comparisons). Varying the definition of lipoatrophy (> or =10 to > or =40% fat loss) and correction for baseline risk factors did not affect the significant difference in lipoatrophy between the NRTI-containing regimens. Lipoatrophy was most frequent with stavudine-containing regimens and least frequent with tenofovir-containing regimens (P < 0.001), which were not significantly different from the NRTI-sparing regimen. Total cholesterol increases at week 96 were greatest in the NRTI-sparing arm (median +57 mg/dl) compared with the other two arms (+32-33 mg/dl; P < 0.001). Use of lipid-lowering agents was more common (25 vs. 11-13%) in the NRTI-sparing arm.. Lipoatrophy was more frequent with efavirenz than lopinavir/r when combined with stavudine or zidovudine, and less frequent when either drug was combined with tenofovir. Lipoatrophy was least frequent with the NRTI-sparing regimen, but this benefit was offset by greater cholesterol elevations and the need for lipid-lowering agents.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Lipid Metabolism; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

We evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ritonavir-boosted dual protease inhibitor as a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing regimen in a prospective open-label randomized pilot trial in antiretroviral-naive patients.. Thirty patients received fosamprenavir/atazanavir/ritonavir (Group 1) and 31 patients received saquinavir/atazanavir/ritonavir (Group 2). The primary endpoint for efficacy was the rate of early virological success, defined as plasma viral load <50 copies/mL at week 16. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00122603).. At baseline, median (range) viral load was 4.8 log(10) copies/mL (4.0-5.7) and the median CD4 cell count was 271/mm(3) (197-740). Viral load was <50 copies/mL in 12/30 patients [40%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 23%-58%] and 13/31 patients (42%, 95% CI 25%-59%) at week 16 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Patients with failing regimens (viral load >or=400 copies/mL at week 16 or >or=50 copies/mL at week 24) were switched to a standard antiretroviral regimen. At week 48, by an intention-to-treat analysis, 23/30 patients (77%) and 26/31 patients (84%) had plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Four patients discontinued treatment for adverse events, all before week 4. No major changes in the protease gene were detected at treatment failure relative to baseline. Baseline viral load <50 000 copies/mL was the only predictor of virological success at week 16.. Ritonavir-boosted dual protease inhibitor regimens targeting only one step of viral replication were insufficient to rapidly suppress plasma HIV RNA to <50 copies/mL in antiretroviral-naive patients with high viral load at baseline.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Asparagine; Atazanavir Sulfate; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphates; Pyridines; Quinolines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

We studied changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover after initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and the contribution of zidovudine/lamivudine (ZDV/3TC) in particular.. Randomized clinical trial comparing lopinavir/ritonavir(LPV/r) + ZDV/3TC with LPV/r + nevirapine (NVP) in 50 cART-naive men.. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography scans (QCT) were performed at baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after cART initiation. Serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D3, parathyroid hormone (PTH), osteocalcin, and urine deoxypyridinoline (DPD)/creatinine ratio were measured.. BMD decreased rapidly in both femoral neck and lumbar spine after cART initiation. BMD loss during 24 months measured by DXA, but not by QCT, was greater in the ZDV/3TC/LPV/r group compared to the NVP/LPV/r group [femoral neck: -6.3% +/- 1.0% (P < 0.0001) compared to -2.3% +/- 0.9% (P = 0.01), between-group P = 0.0006); lumbar spine: -5.1% +/- 0.8% (P < 0.0001) compared to -2.6% +/- 0.7% (P = 0.0006), between-group P = 0.07]. Osteocalcin [+1.60 +/- 0.32 (P < 0.0001) and +1.81 +/- 0.29 (P < 0.0001) nmol/l] and the urine DPD/creatinine ratio [+1.35 +/- 0.44 (P = 0.0029) and +1.19 +/- 0.38 nmol/mmol (P = 0.0024)] increased in both groups over 24 months, with no significant difference between groups. PTH increased to a greater degree in the NVP/LPV/r group [+2.0 +/- 0.31 pmol/l (P < 0.0001)] compared to [+0.81 +/- 0.33 pmol/l (P = 0.021) in the ZDV/3TC/LPV/r group].. BMD in both femoral neck and lumbar spine decreased rapidly after initiation of cART, in parallel to an increase in bone turnover. The greater bone loss in the ZDV/3TC/LPV/r group compared to the NVP/LPV/r group suggests that ZDV/3TC contributes to this process. The PTH increase does not explain this greater bone loss.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Bone Density; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nevirapine; Osteoporosis; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Young Adult; Zidovudine

The MONARK study was a pilot randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy to those of LPV/r-zidovudine-lamivudine triple therapy for antiretroviral-naïve human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients. Resistance testing was performed at the time of initial screening and at the time of virological failure (defined to include low-level viremia with >50 and <400 HIV-1 virus RNA copies/ml of plasma). Changes from the baseline sequences, including mutations noted on the 2008 International AIDS Society-USA list of resistance-associated protease mutations, were considered. Drug resistance testing was performed for 38 patients (5 of 53 on triple therapy and 33 of 83 on monotherapy). By week 96 (W96), virus samples from 18 of 33 patients in the monotherapy arm showed changes from baseline sequences, and 5 of these patients had viruses with major protease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations (M46I at W40, L76V at W48, M46I and L76V at W48, L10F and V82A at W72, and L76V at W84). Data on virus phenotypes detected at the time of initial screening and the time of virological failure were available for four patients in whom major PI resistance mutations developed, and these data revealed a mean increase of 2.2-fold (range, 0.75- to 4.6-fold) in the LPV 50% inhibitory concentration. All three patients in whom the L76V PI resistance mutation developed were infected with HIV-1 subtype CRF02_AG. In the triple-therapy group, no major PI resistance mutation was selected among the three patients with protease changes by W48. No association between the baseline CD4 cell count and the viral load, the W4 and final viral loads, or the final LPV trough concentration and the emergence of a major PI resistance mutation was found. Major PI resistance-associated mutations were detected in 5 (6%) of 83 patients treated with LPV/r monotherapy, suggesting that LPV/r monotherapy is an inappropriate first option. The mutation L76V may be considered in further studies of lopinavir resistance.

Topics: Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Zidovudine

Currently, the optimal boosting dose for saquinavir is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics profiles in a cross over setting comparing saquinavir/ritonavir 1500/50 mg (plus NRTI backbone) to saquinavir/ritonavir 1500/100 mg in the same HIV-infected, Thai individuals. The 50% reduction of ritonavir boosting did not result in a change in the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir, whereas the ritonavir exposure was significantly lower when a dose of 50 mg was administered.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Pregnancy affects the pharmacokinetics of most protease inhibitors. Saquinavir, when administered in a tablet formulation, has not been studied extensively in this setting.. A pharmacokinetic, prospective, multicentre trial of HIV type-1-infected pregnant women treated with saquinavir (500 mg tablets) boosted with ritonavir at a dose of 1,000/100 mg twice daily plus a nucleoside backbone was conducted. Pharmacokinetic curves were recorded for 12 h in the second trimester (week 20 +/-2), the third trimester (week 33 +/-2) and post-partum (weeks 4-6). Blood was sampled pre-dosing and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h post-dosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using WinNonlin software version 4.1.. A total of 37 women were included in the analysis. Mean (+/-sd) values for saquinavir area under the curve (AUC(0-12h)) were 23.47 h*mg/l (11.92) at week 20 (n=16), 23.65 h*mg/l (9.07) at week 33 (n=31) and 25.00 h*mg/l (11.81) post-partum (n=9). There was no significant difference in the saquinavir AUC(0-12h) when comparing the data during pregnancy and post-partum. Subtherapeutic plasma concentrations of saquinavir (defined as <0.10 mg/l) were not observed throughout the study. No major safety concerns were noted.. Saquinavir exposure in the new tablet formulation generates adequate saquinavir concentrations throughout the course of pregnancy and is safe to use; therefore, no dose adjustment during pregnancy is needed.

Topics: Adult; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Tablets; Thailand; Treatment Outcome

Characterization of resistance development in virologic failure patients on the protease inhibitor darunavir administered with low-dose ritonavir (DRV/r) in the 48-week analysis of TMC114/r In Treatment-experienced pAtients Naive to lopinavir (TITAN).. TITAN is a randomized, controlled, open-label, phase III, noninferiority trial comparing the efficacy and safety of DRV/r with that of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced, LPV-naive patients. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies/ml at week 48.. Patients received DRV/r 600/100 mg twice daily (n = 298) or LPV/r 400/100 mg twice daily (n = 297), and an optimized background regimen. Patients who lost or never achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies/ml after week 16 were considered virologic failure patients. Genotyping and phenotyping were performed.. The virologic failure rate in the DRV/r arm (10%, n = 31) was lower than in the LPV/r arm (22%, n = 65). Furthermore, fewer virologic failure patients in the DRV/r arm than in the LPV/r arm developed primary protease inhibitor mutations (6 vs. 20) or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance-associated mutations (4 vs. 15). In addition, fewer virologic failure patients on DRV/r than on LPV/r lost susceptibility to the protease inhibitor (3 vs. 13) or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor(s) (3 vs. 14) used in the treatment regimen or to other protease inhibitors. Most DRV/r-treated virologic failure patients retained susceptibility to all protease inhibitors.. In treatment-experienced, LPV-naive patients, the overall virologic failure rate in the DRV/r arm was low and was associated with limited resistance development. These findings showed that the use of DRV/r in earlier lines of treatment was less likely to lead to cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors compared with LPV/r.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Mutation; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

To determine the effects of switching from lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) to atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) on muscle glucose uptake, glucose homeostasis, lipids, and body composition.. Fifteen HIV-infected men and women on a regimen containing LPV/r and with evidence of hyperinsulinemia and/or dyslipidemia were randomized to continue LPV/r or to switch to ATV/r (ATV 300 mg and ritonavir 100 mg daily) for 6 months. The primary endpoint was change in thigh muscle glucose uptake as measured by positron emission tomography. Secondary endpoints included abdominal visceral adipose tissue, fasting lipids, and safety parameters. The difference over time between treatment groups (treatment effect of ATV/r relative to LPV/r) was determined by repeated measures ANCOVA.. After 6 months, anterior thigh muscle glucose uptake increased significantly (treatment effect +18.2 +/- 5.9 micromol/kg per min, ATV/r vs. LPV/r, P = 0.035), and visceral adipose tissue area decreased significantly in individuals who switched to ATV/r (treatment effect -31 +/- 11 cm, ATV/r vs. LPV/r, P = 0.047). Switching to ATV/r significantly decreased triglyceride (treatment effect -182 +/- 64 mg/dl, ATV/r vs. LPV/r, P = 0.02) and total cholesterol (treatment effect -23 +/- 8 mg/dl, ATV/r vs. LPV/r, P = 0.01), whereas high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein did not change significantly. Fasting glucose also decreased significantly following switch to ATV/r (treatment effect -15 +/- 4 mg/dl, ATV/r vs. LPV/r, P = 0.002).. Switching from LPV/r to ATV/r significantly increases glucose uptake by muscle, decreases abdominal visceral adipose tissue, improves lipid parameters, and decreases fasting glucose over 6 months.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Female; Glucose; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Intra-Abdominal Fat; Lipid Metabolism; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle, Skeletal; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Present 96-week data from ongoing ARTEMIS (AntiRetroviral Therapy with TMC114 ExaMined In Naive Subjects) trial.. Randomized, open-label, phase III trial of antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV-1 RNA at least 5000 copies/ml (stratified by HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell count) receiving darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg once daily or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 800/200 mg total daily dose (twice daily or once daily) and fixed-dose tenofovir/emtricitabine. Primary outcome measure was noninferiority of DRV/r vs. LPV/r in virologic response (<50 copies/ml, time-to-loss of virologic response) at 96 weeks (secondary outcome: superiority).. Six hundred eighty-nine patients were enrolled. At week 96, significantly more DRV/r (79%) than LPV/r patients (71%) had viral load less than 50 copies/ml, confirming statistical noninferiority (estimated difference: 8.4%; 95% confidence interval 1.9-14.8; P < 0.001; per-protocol) and superiority (P = 0.012; intent-to-treat) in virologic response. Median CD4 cell count increases from baseline were 171 and 188 cells/microl for DRV/r and LPV/r, respectively (P = 0.57; noncompleter=failure). Overall, 4% of DRV/r patients and 9% of LPV/r patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Lower rates of grade 2-4 treatment-related diarrhea were seen with DRV/r (4%) vs. LPV/r (11%; P < 0.001), whereas grade 2-4 treatment-related rash occurred infrequently in both arms (3 vs. 1%, respectively; P = 0.273). DRV/r patients had smaller median increases in triglycerides (0.1 and 0.6 mmol/l, respectively, P < 0.0001) and total cholesterol (0.6 and 0.9 mmol/l, respectively; P < 0.0001) than LPV/r patients; levels remained below National Cholesterol Education Program cut-offs for DRV/r.. At week 96, once-daily DRV/r was both statistically noninferior and superior in virologic response to LPV/r, with a more favorable gastrointestinal and lipid profile, confirming DRV/r as an effective, well tolerated, and durable option for antiretroviral-naive patients.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Decreased bone mineral density (BMD) has been described in HIV-infected patients initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART), but the contributions of ART and immunologic and/or virologic factors remain unclear.. We compared total BMD changes over 96 weeks in 106 ART-naive HIV-infected subjects who were randomized to receive efavirenz (EFV) + zidovudine/lamivudine (n = 32) or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) + zidovudine/lamivudine induction (n = 74) for 24-48 weeks followed by LPV/r monotherapy. We also sought to identify factors associated with BMD loss, including markers of systemic inflammation [soluble tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptors (sTNFR I and II)].. After 96 weeks, the mean percent change from baseline in total BMD was -2.5% (LPV/r) and -2.3% (EFV) (P < 0.01 for within-group changes in either arm; P = 0.86 for between-group differences). No alteration in the rate of BMD change was observed upon simplification to LPV/r monotherapy. Although soluble tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor II concentrations at baseline and 24 weeks were at least marginally associated with subsequent changes in BMD (P = 0.06 and P = 0.028, respectively), these associations were no longer significant after adjustment for CD4 T cell count. Subjects with lower baseline CD4 T cell count, non-black race, and higher baseline glucose demonstrated a higher risk for >5% decrease in BMD.. Similar decreases in BMD over 96 weeks occurred in ART-naive subjects receiving either EFV-based regimen or LPV/r-based regimen, which was not altered by simplification to LPV/r monotherapy and was unrelated to markers of tumor necrosis factor-alpha activity.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Bone Density; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Inflammation Mediators; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoporosis; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I; Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type II; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Zidovudine

APV102002 was an open-label study comparing a dual-boosted HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI) [fosamprenavir/lopinavir/ritonavir (FPV/LPV/RTV; 1400 mg/533 mg/133 mg twice daily)] and a high dose of FPV/RTV 1400 mg/100 mg twice daily (HD-FPV/RTV) versus the standard FPV/RTV 700 mg/100 mg twice-daily (STD-FPV/RTV) regimen for 24 weeks.. Adult patients with prior failure to two or more PI-based regimens and on a failing PI regimen were randomized to STD-FPV/RTV (n = 24), HD-FPV/RTV (n = 25) or FPV/LPV/RTV (n = 25). The primary aim was to test week 24 superiority of HD-FPV/RTV and FPV/LPV/RTV over STD-FPV/RTV as measured by plasma HIV-1 RNA average area under the curve minus baseline (AAUCMB).. There was no difference in the week 24 AAUCMB between the regimens. The proportion of patients with <50 copies/mL of plasma HIV RNA was 21%, 24% and 20%, respectively, by time to loss of virological response (TLOVR) analysis. High baseline drug resistance provided some explanation for the low efficacy. A lower baseline background drug resistance and higher fosamprenavir genotypic inhibitory quotient led to better antiviral responses. The plasma amprenavir trough concentartion (C(tau)) was 49% higher in the HD-FPV/RTV arm than in the STD-FPV/RTV arm and similar in the FPV/LPV/RTV and STD-FPV/RTV arms. The plasma lopinavir C(tau) was similar to historical data with standard LPV/RTV 400 mg/100 mg twice daily. All regimens were relatively well tolerated, although diarrhoea was more frequent in the HD-FPV/RTV and FPV/LPV/RTV arms, and hypertriglyceridaemia and increased total cholesterol were more common in the FPV/LPV/RTV arm.. While the strategies of higher dose FPV/RTV and dual FPV/LPV/RTV were relevant at the time of study initiation, new therapies for antiretroviral-experienced patients make such strategies of limited interest. In addition, this study failed to demonstrate antiviral superiority of the HD-FPV/RTV or FPV/LPV/RTV regimen over the STD-FPV/RTV twice-daily regimen in highly treatment-experienced patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Abacavir sulfate/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) and tenofovir DF/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) are widely used nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for initial HIV-1 treatment. This is the first completed, randomized clinical trial to directly compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of these agents, each in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive patients.. Six hundred and eighty-eight antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients were randomized in this double-blind, placebo-matched, multicenter, noninferiority study to receive a once-daily regimen of either ABC/3TC 600 mg/300 mg or TDF/FTC 300 mg/200 mg, both with lopinavir/ritonavir 800 mg/200 mg. Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/ml at week 48 (missing = failure, switch included analysis) and the proportion of patients experiencing adverse events over 96 weeks.. At week 48, 68% in the ABC/3TC group vs. 67% in the TDF/FTC group achieved an HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/ml (intent-to-treat exposed missing = failure, 95% confidence interval on the difference -6.63 to 7.40, P = 0.913), demonstrating the noninferiority of ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC at week 48. Noninferiority of the two regimens was sustained at week 96 (60% vs. 58%, respectively, 95% confidence interval -5.41 to 9.32, P = 0.603). In addition, efficacy of both regimens was similar in patients with baseline HIV-1 RNA >or= 100 000 copies/ml or CD4 cell counts below 50 cells/microl. Median CD4 recovery (ABC/3TC vs. TDF/FTC, cells/microl) was +250 vs. +247 by week 96. Premature study discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 6% of patients in both groups. Protocol-defined virologic failure occurred in 14% of patients in both groups.. Both ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC provided comparable antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability when each was combined with lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive patients.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Cardiovascular Diseases; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Deoxycytidine; Dideoxynucleosides; Double-Blind Method; Emtricitabine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Organophosphonates; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

Once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is not approved for treatment of HIV paediatric patients. Once daily treatment in children might serve the same goals of patient comfort and adherence as in adults.. HIV type-1-infected children aged 6 months to 18 years, who were virologically suppressed on an LPV/r-containing regimen, were eligible. Treatment 1 consisted of once-daily LPV/r 460/115 mg/m(2), plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Treatment 2 consisted of twice-daily LPV/r 230/57.5 mg/m(2) plus two NRTIs. Patients were randomized either to start with treatment 1 followed by treatment 2 or vice versa. Full pharmacokinetic profiles were analysed for lopinavir and ritonavir with a validated HPLC tandem mass spectrometry assay.. Seven patients (five girls and two boys) were included in the study. Median age was 9.8 years (range 5.8-15.5). For the once-daily treatment, the median (range) lopinavir 24 h area under the plasma -concentration-time curve (AUC(24 h)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and 24 h plasma concentration (C(24 h)) were 214.6 h*mg/l (114.2-289.2), 13.5 mg/l (8.3-17.5) and 3.4 mg/l (0.6-7.4), respectively. For the twice-daily treatment the median (range) lopinavir 12 h area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(12 h)), C(max) and 12 h plasma concentration (C(12 h)) were 80.9 h*mg/l (23.3-135.9), 9.8 mg/l (3.4-15.2) and 5.7 mg/l (1.7-9.7), respectively.. This study suggests that the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir after twice-daily and once-daily dosing are similar, with no observable difference in tolerability, in this group of patients between 5 and 15 years old.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Genotypic algorithms used to predict the clinical efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) have included a range of mutation lists and efficacy endpoints. Normally, HIV clinical trials are powered to detect a difference between treatment arms of 10-12% for the endpoint of viral load suppression <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL. The TITAN trial evaluated LPV/r vs. darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) in treatment-experienced patients with viral load >1000 copies/mL. This analysis aimed to re-evaluate resistance algorithms for LPV/r in the TITAN trial.. Baseline genotype data were classified using seven genotypic resistance algorithms: International AIDS Society USA (IAS-USA) LPV mutations (current cut-off=6), Abbott 2007 mutation list (cut-off=3), ANRS mutations (cut-off=4), FDA mutations (cut-off=3), Stanford, REGA and IAS-USA major protease inhibitor (PI) mutations. Efficacy in the TITAN trial (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48) was correlated with the number of mutations from each list, to show the 'efficacy advantage cut-off level': the number of mutations from each list associated with a difference in efficacy between treatment arms of at least 12%.. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified lower genotypic cut-off levels than previously reported where there was at least 12% lower efficacy for LPV/r vs. DRV/r. These efficacy advantage cut-off levels were: IAS-USA LPV mutations, cut-off=3; Abbott 2007, cut-off=2; ANRS LPV, cut-off=3; FDA LPV mutations, cut-off=2; major IAS-USA PI mutations, cut-off=1; Stanford algorithm, cut-off=low-level LPV resistance; REGA algorithm, cut-off=intermediate-level LPV resistance. There were linear falls in HIV-1 RNA suppression rates with rising mutation counts in the TITAN, French LPV ATU, BMS-045 and RESIST trials.. The analysis identified more sensitive cut-off levels for LPV genotypic algorithms, below those currently used.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Logistic Models; Lopinavir; Male; Mutation; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

To investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) and nevirapine (NVP) in 19 HIV-infected patients.. An open-label, randomized, crossover study. Patients received Treatment A [NVP 200 mg b.i.d. plus > or =2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)] and Treatment B [A plus DRV/r 300/100 mg b.i.d. (DRV oral solution)] or Treatment B2 [A plus DRV/r 400/100 mg b.i.d. (DRV tablet)] in two 14-day sessions.. Mean NVP AUC(12h) increased by 27% [least square means ratio 1.27 (95% confidence interval 1.02, 1.58)]. Mean DRV and ritonavir exposures were similar to historical data. Co-administration was well tolerated.. DRV/r and NVP have no clinically relevant interaction. No dose adjustments are required.

Topics: Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Darunavir; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nevirapine; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-related mitochondrial toxicity has been suggested as a key factor in the induction of antiretroviral-related lipoatrophy. This study aimed to evaluate in vivo the effects of NRTI withdrawal on mitochondrial parameters and body fat distribution.. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial assessed the efficacy and tolerability of switching to lopinavir-ritonavir plus nevirapine (nevirapine group; n = 34), compared with lopinavir-ritonavir plus 2 NRTIs (control group; n = 33) in a group of human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults with virological suppression. A subset of 35 individuals (20 from the nevirapine group and 15 from the control group) were evaluated for changes in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to nuclear DNA ratio and cytochrome c oxidase (COX) activity after NRTI withdrawal. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were used to objectively quantify fat redistribution over time.. The nevirapine group experienced a progressive increase in mtDNA content (a 40% increase at week 48; P = .039 for comparison between groups) and in the COX activity (26% and 32% at weeks 24 and 48, respectively; P = .01 and P = .09 for comparison between groups, respectively). There were no statistically significant between-group differences in DEXA scans at week 48, although a higher fat increase in extremities was observed in the nevirapine group. No virologic failures occurred in either treatment arm.. Switching to a nucleoside-sparing regimen of nevirapine and lopinavir-ritonavir maintained full antiviral efficacy and led to an improvement in mitochondrial parameters, which suggests a reversion of nucleoside-associated mitochondrial toxicity. Although DEXA scans performed during the study only revealed slight changes in fat redistribution, a longer follow-up period may show a positive correlation between reduced mitochondrial toxicity and a clinical improvement of lipodystrophy.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Body Composition; DNA, Mitochondrial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electron Transport Complex IV; Extremities; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nevirapine; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The effect of hepatic impairment on fosamprenavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics was investigated. Sixty human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects, including 13, 20, and 10 subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment, respectively, and a comparator group of 17 subjects with normal hepatic function, were enrolled. Subjects with normal hepatic function received fosamprenavir at 700 mg plus ritonavir at 100 mg twice daily, whereas subjects with hepatic impairment received adjusted doses in anticipation of increased exposures. For subjects with mild hepatic impairment, the studied regimen of fosamprenavir 700 mg twice daily plus ritonavir 100 mg once daily delivered 17% higher values for the maximum plasma amprenavir concentration at the steady state (C(max)), 22% higher values for the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve over the dosing interval at the steady state [AUC(0-tau)], similar values for the concentration at the end of the dosing interval (C(tau)), and 114% higher unbound C(tau) values. For subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, the studied dosage regimen of fosamprenavir at 300 mg twice daily plus ritonavir at 100 mg once daily delivered 27% lower plasma amprenavir C(max) values, 27% lower AUC(0-24) values, 57% lower C(tau) values, and 21% higher unbound amprenavir C(tau) values. For subjects with severe hepatic impairment, the studied dosage regimen of fosamprenavir at 300 mg twice daily plus ritonavir at 100 mg once daily delivered 19% lower plasma amprenavir C(max) values, 23% lower AUC(0-24) values, 38% lower C(tau) values, and similar unbound amprenavir C(tau) values. With a reduced ritonavir dosing frequency of 100 mg once daily, the plasma ritonavir AUC(0-24) values were 39% lower, similar, and 40% higher for subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment, respectively. The results of the study support the use of reduced fosamprenavir/ritonavir doses or dosing frequencies in the treatment of patients with hepatic impairment. No significant safety issues were identified; however, plasma amprenavir and ritonavir exposures were more variable in subjects with hepatic impairment, and those patients should be closely monitored for safety and virologic response.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Carbamates; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Liver Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Young Adult

To assess pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) and optimized background regimen in treatment-experienced patients (6-17 years).. Forty-eight-week, open-label, two-part, phase II study.. In part I, 44 patients were randomized (1: 1 ratio) to receive a body weight-adjusted, adult-equivalent dose (group A) or a 20-33% higher DRV/r twice daily (b.i.d.) dose (group B). Pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy were assessed following 2-week dosing (part I), which determined dosing for part II (evaluated 48-week safety and efficacy).. In part I, both groups met the protocol-specified criteria for pharmacokinetics and showed favorable tolerability and efficacy. The following body-weight doses were selected: DRV/r 375/50 mg b.i.d. (20-<30 kg), 450/60 mg b.i.d. (30-<40 kg) and 600/100 mg b.i.d. (> or =40 kg); these gave an AUC24h, C0h and Cmax of 102, 114 and 112%, respectively, versus the corresponding mean adult pharmacokinetic parameter. In part II, 80 patients received DRV/r (median age: 14 years, mean baseline HIV-1 RNA: 4.64 log(10)copies/ml). One patient (1%) discontinued (treatment-unrelated grade 3 anxiety). An abnormal mean baseline triglyceride level was normalized at 48 weeks (P < 0.01). At week 48, 65% had at least 1.0 log(10)HIV-1 RNA reduction; 59 and 48% achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 400 and less than 50 copies/ml, respectively (time-to-loss-of-virologic response). Mean age-adjusted weight z-score increased by 0.2 (P = 0.003).. In treatment-experienced children and adolescents, DRV/r showed comparable exposure to adults with appropriate dose selection, favorable safety and tolerability, improved body weight and significant virologic response. DRV/r is a valuable therapeutic option for this population.

Topics: Adolescent; Child; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Patient Compliance; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

HIV-infected patients with opioid dependence often require opioid replacement therapy. Pharmacokinetic interactions between HIV therapy and opioid dependence treatment medications can occur. HIV-seronegative subjects stabilized on at least 3 weeks of buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP/NLX) therapy sequentially underwent baseline and steady-state pharmacokinetic evaluation of open-label, twice daily tipranavir 500 mg co-administered with ritonavir 200 mg (TPV/r). Twelve subjects were enrolled and 10 completed the study. Prior to starting TPV/r, the geometric mean BUP AUC(0-24h) and C(max) were 43.9 ng h/mL and 5.61 ng/mL, respectively. After achieving steady-state with TPV/r (> or = 7 days), these values were similar at 43.7 ng h/mL and 4.84 ng/mL, respectively. Similar analyses for norBUP, the primary metabolite of BUP, demonstrated a reduction in geometric mean for AUC(0-24h) [68.7-14.7 ng h/mL; ratio=0.21 (90% CI 0.19-0.25)] and C(max) [4.75-0.94 ng/mL; ratio=0.20 (90% CI 0.17-0.23)]. The last measurable NLX concentration (C(last)) in the concentration-time profile, never measured in previous BUP/NLX interaction studies with antiretroviral medications, was decreased by 20%. Despite these pharmacokinetic effects on BUP metabolites and NLX, no clinical opioid withdrawal symptoms were noted. TPV steady-state AUC(0-12h) and C(max) decreased 19% and 25%, respectively, and C(min) was relatively unchanged when compared to historical control subjects receiving TPV/r alone. No dosage modification of BUP/NLX is required when co-administered with TPV/r. Though mechanistically unclear, it is likely that decreased plasma RTV levels while on BUP/NLX contributed substantially to the decrease in TPV levels. BUP/NLX and TPV/r should therefore be used cautiously to avoid decreased efficacy of TPV in patients taking these agents concomitantly.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Buprenorphine; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Seronegativity; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Lopinavir/ritonavir is a common protease inhibitor (PI) used for second-line regimens in children. Several studies have shown higher plasma concentrations of antiretroviral agents in Thai adults than in Caucasians, suggesting that lower doses may be used.. An open label study in 24 HIV-infected children between the age of 2 and 18 years, naive to PIs, randomized to receive either the WHO-recommended dose of lopinavir/ritonavir or a low dose (70% of the standard dose) twice daily in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine. A 12 h pharmacokinetic study was done at 4-6 weeks after starting treatment. Treatment outcomes were evaluated at week 48. The clinical trial number of the study is NCT00887120.. The medians [interquartile ranges (IQRs)] of age, body surface area, percentage CD4 and plasma HIV RNA were 9.5 years (7.0-12.3), 0.9 m(2) (0.8-1.1), 17% (11%-24%) and 4.6 log(10) copies/mL (4.1-4.9), respectively. The median (IQR) lopinavir dose was 279 mg/m(2)/dose (263-294) and 194 mg/m(2)/dose (176-206) in the standard and low-dose arms, respectively. Median (IQR) AUC(0-12) and C(trough) of lopinavir were 117.6 mg.h/L (74.0-128.5) and 4.9 mg/L (2.7-8.0) for the standard arm and 83.8 mg.h/L (56.0-112.9) and 3.4 mg/L (2.7-5.4) for the low-dose arm. One child in the low-dose arm had a lopinavir pre-dose level of <1.0 mg/L. At week 48, the median percentage CD4 was 22% (15%-28%) and 27% (21%-31%) in the standard and low-dose arms, respectively, while 50% and 83% of children had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL, respectively (P = 0.19).. Low-dose lopinavir displayed adequate pharmacokinetic parameters and good efficacy as compared with standard-dose lopinavir in Thai children. A larger study to investigate the efficacy of low-dose lopinavir is warranted.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Plasma; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Zidovudine

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an enfuvirtide-based antiretroviral (ARV) regimen on the management of immunosuppression and follow-up in hepatitis C virus (HCV)/hepatitis B virus (HBV)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-coinfected liver transplant patients in comparison with a lopinavir/ritonavir-based ARV regimen. Tacrolimus and cyclosporine trough concentrations were determined at a steady state during 3 periods: after liver transplantation without ARV treatment (period 1), at the time of ARV reintroduction (period 2), and 2 to 3 months after liver transplantation (period 3). The findings for 22 HIV-coinfected patients were compared (18 with HCV and 4 with HBV); 11 patients were treated with enfuvirtide and were matched with 11 lopinavir/ritonavir-exposed patients. During period 1, tacrolimus and cyclosporine A doses were 8 and 600 mg/day, respectively, and the trough concentrations were within the therapeutic range in both groups. In period 2, the addition of lopinavir/ritonavir to the immunosuppressant regimen enabled a reduction in the dose of immunosuppressants required to maintain trough concentrations within the therapeutic range (to 0.3 mg/day for tacrolimus and 75 mg/day for cyclosporine). Immunosuppressant doses were not modified by the reintroduction of enfuvirtide, there being no change in the mean trough concentrations over the 3 periods. CD4 cell counts remained at about 200 cells/mm3. The HIV RNA viral load remained undetectable. Both groups displayed signs of mild cytolysis and cholestasis due to the recurrence of HCV, whereas no renal insufficiency was observed. Enfuvirtide is an attractive alternative to standard ARV therapy, facilitating the management of drug-drug interactions shortly after liver transplantation. Moreover, the lack of liver toxicity renders this drug valuable in the event of a severe HCV recurrence.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Cyclosporine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enfuvirtide; Female; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Liver Failure; Liver Transplantation; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Tacrolimus; Treatment Outcome

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated tuberculosis is difficult to treat, given the propensity for drug interactions between the rifamycins and the antiretroviral drugs. We examined the pharmacokinetics of rifabutin before and after the addition of lopinavir-ritonavir.. We analyzed 10 patients with HIV infection and active tuberculosis in a state tuberculosis hospital. Plasma was collected for measurement of rifabutin, the microbiologically active 25-desacetyl-rifabutin, and lopinavir by validated high-performance liquid chromatography assays. Samples were collected 2-4 weeks after starting rifabutin at 300 mg thrice weekly without lopinavir-ritonavir, 2 weeks after the addition of lopinavir-ritonavir at 400 and 100 mg, respectively, twice daily to rifabutin at 150 mg thrice weekly, and (if rifabutin plasma concentrations were below the normal range) 2 weeks after an increase in rifabutin to 300 mg thrice weekly with lopinavir-ritonavir. Noncompartmental and population pharmacokinetic analyses (2-compartment open model) were performed.. Rifabutin at 300 mg without lopinavir-ritonavir produced a low maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) in 5 of 10 patients. After the addition of lopinavir-ritonavir to rifabutin at 150 mg, 9 of 10 had low C(max) values. Eight patients had dose increases to 300 mg of rifabutin with lopinavir-ritonavir. Most free rifabutin (unbound to plasma protein) C(max) values were below the tuberculosis minimal inhibitory concentration. For most patients, values for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve were as low or lower than those associated with treatment failure or relapse and with acquired rifamycin resistance in Tuberculosis Trials Consortium/US Public Health Service Study 23. One of the 10 patients experienced relapse with acquired rifamycin resistance.. The recommended rifabutin doses for use with lopinavir-ritonavir may be inadequate in many patients. Monitoring of plasma concentrations is recommended.

Topics: Adult; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Antiviral Agents; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Rifabutin; Ritonavir; Tuberculosis

Long-term (96-week) efficacy and safety of the protease inhibitor (PI) darunavir coadministered with low-dose ritonavir (DRV/r) was evaluated in HIV type-1 (HIV-1)-infected patients with extensive prior treatment experience in the POWER 1, 2 and 3 trials.. Patients with HIV-1 RNA>or=1,000 copies/ml and >or=1 primary PI mutation were randomized to receive either DRV/r 600/100 mg twice daily plus an optimized background regimen (OBR), or an investigator-selected control PI (CPI) plus OBR (POWER 3 was a DRV/r 600/100 mg twice daily single-arm study). The proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/ml at week 96 was assessed (intent-to-treat [ITT], time-to-loss of virological response algorithm).. In total, 467 patients received DRV/r 600/100 mg twice daily; 124 patients received CPI(s). At week 96, 39% of DRV/r patients in POWER 1 and 2 (pooled analysis) versus 9% of CPI patients achieved HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/ml (ITT, time-to-loss of virological response algorithm; P<0.001). A similar proportion of DRV/r patients (42%) in POWER 3 achieved HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/ml at week 96. Mean absolute CD4(+) T-cell count increase for DRV/r at 96 weeks was 133 cells/mm(3) in POWER 1 and 2 and 103 cells/mm(3) in POWER 3. Grade 2-4 treatment-emergent adverse events at least possibly related to DRV/r (>or=2% incidence, excluding laboratory abnormalities) were diarrhoea (3%), vomiting (3%), nausea (2%) and headache (2%).. Treatment with DRV/r 600/100 mg twice daily was well tolerated and led to sustained virological and immunological responses in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients over 96 weeks.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

The introduction of 2 or 3 fully active drugs in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients receiving failing antiretroviral therapy is a key determinant of subsequent treatment efficacy. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a regimen containing raltegravir, etravirine, and darunavir/ritonavir for treatment-experienced patients infected with multidrug-resistant HIV.. Patients enrolled in this phase II, noncomparative, multicenter trial were naive to the investigational drugs and had plasma HIV RNA levels >1000 copies/mL, a history of virologic failure while receiving nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), > or =3 primary protease inhibitor and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations, and < or =3 darunavir and NNRTI mutations. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA levels <50 copies/mL at 24 weeks.. A total of 103 patients enrolled in the study. At baseline, genotypic resistance profiles showed a median of 4 primary protease inhibitor mutations, 1 NNRTI mutation, and 6 NRTI mutations. In addition to the investigational drugs, 90 patients (87%) received optimized background therapy that included NRTIs (86 patients) or enfuvirtide (12 patients). At week 24, 90% of patients (95% confidence interval, 85%-96%) had an HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL. At week 48, 86% (95% confidence interval, 80%-93%) had an HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL. The median CD4 cell count increase was 108 cells/mm(3). Grade 3 or 4 clinical adverse events were reported in 15 patients (14.6%). Only 1 patient discontinued the investigational antiretroviral regimen, because of an adverse event.. In patients infected with multidrug-resistant virus who have few remaining treatment options, the combination of raltegravir, etravirine, and darunavir/ritonavir is well tolerated and is associated with a rate of virologic suppression similar to that expected in treatment-naive patients.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; Deoxycytidine; Directly Observed Therapy; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emtricitabine; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Medication Adherence; Organophosphonates; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Self Administration; Stavudine; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

Generic drugs can contribute to access to treatment for HIV-infected patients. However quality and safety remains an issue of concern. Therefore, we evaluated minimal plasma concentrations and short-term safety of a generic lopinavir/ritonavir 200/50 mg tablet formulation.. In a single-centre prospective pilot study, patients receiving protease-inhibitor-based antiretroviral treatment were switched to a generic lopinavir/ritonavir tablet at the standard dose (400/100 mg twice daily). Minimum drug concentrations (C(min)) of lopinavir and ritonavir were performed before switching (in 16 patients who were on Kaletra((R)) soft-gel capsules) and after 4 weeks (in all patients). Plasma levels of lopinavir and ritonavir were determined by a validated HPLC method. Either the Wilcoxon signed-rank or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the groups.. A total of 37 patients (18 females) were included in the study. Two stopped their study medications prematurely because of intolerance. The median (interquartile range) lopinavir C(min) was 7.2 mg/l (5.8-8.3) and no patients had subtherapeutic levels <1.0 mg/l. No significant difference of lopinavir C(min) levels was found between Kaletra((R)), and the generic product (P=0.224). By contrast, the C(min) of generic ritonavir was higher (P=0.012). Food did not affect the drug levels. Mild gastrointestinal complaints were reported in 12 patients.. The generic lopinavir/ritonavir tablet showed C(min) plasma concentrations similar to what is described for the branded product, with good stability, independent of food intake. These data support the efforts in scaling up access to generic second-line treatment in middle- and low-income countries.

Topics: Adult; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drugs, Generic; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Tablets

The central nervous system may act as a sanctuary site for viral replication in the setting of low antiretroviral penetration. Data on lopinavir cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) trough concentration (C(trough)) values have yet to be reported.. To describe lopinavir CSF C(trough) values and compare them with a measure of HIV susceptibility.. In a prospective, open-label design, HIV-infected adults whose regimen included lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100-mg soft-gel capsules twice daily for at least 4 weeks were enrolled. Each subject had 8 plasma lopinavir concentrations determined over a 12-hour dosing interval and 1 CSF lopinavir C(trough) value determined at the end of the study. Linear regression methods tested for associations between CSF or CSF to plasma concentration ratio and covariates including pharmacokinetic parameters and CSF protein.. Ten patients (7 male; median [range] +/- SD age 45.3 +/- 2.8 y) completed the study. Median (intraquartile range [IQR]) lopinavir plasma 0- to 12-hour area under the curve (AUC(0-12)) and minimum concentrations were 71.3 h x microg/mL (48.4-87.6) and 3.82 microg/mL (2.76-5.34). Median (IQR) CSF C(trough), paired plasma concentration, and time since last dose were 11,200 pg/mL (6760-16,400), 5.42 microg/mL (3.88-5.85), and 9.9 hours (9.7-10.2), respectively. Median (IQR) CSF to plasma concentration ratio was 0.225% (0.194-0.324). Lopinavir CSF C(trough) was above the median 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) for wild-type HIV-1 (wtHIV-1) (1900 pg/mL) in all subjects. Lopinavir plasma AUC(0-12) (r(2) = 0.65; p = 0.009) and CSF protein (r(2) = 0.26; p = 0.006) were associated with lopinavir CSF concentration, while CSF protein (r(2) = 0.66; p = 0.008) was associated with CSF to plasma concentration ratio.. Lopinavir CSF C(trough) was above the median IC(50) for wtHIV-1 replication in all patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100-mg soft-gel capsules twice daily.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Linear Models; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Time Factors; Virus Replication

The risk and course of serum transaminase elevations (TEs) and clinical hepatic serious adverse event (SAE) development in ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) 500/200 mg BID recipients, who also received additional combination antiretroviral treatment agents in clinical trials (TPV/r-based cART), was determined.. Aggregated transaminase and hepatic SAE data through 96 weeks of TPV/r-based cART from five Phase IIb/III trials were analyzed. Patients were categorized by the presence or absence of underlying liver disease (+LD or -LD). Kaplan-Meier (K-M) probability estimates for time-to-first US National Institutes of Health, Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Grade 3/4 TE and clinical hepatic SAE were determined and clinical actions/outcomes evaluated. Risk factors for DAIDS Grade 3/4 TE were identified through multivariate Cox regression statistical modeling.. Grade 3/4 TEs occurred in 144/1299 (11.1%) patients; 123/144 (85%) of these were asymptomatic; 84% of these patients only temporarily interrupted treatment or continued, with transaminase levels returning to Grade < or = 2. At 96 weeks of study treatment, the incidence of Grade 3/4 TEs was higher among the +LD (16.8%) than among the -LD (10.1%) patients. K-M analysis revealed an incremental risk for developing DAIDS Grade 3/4 TEs; risk was greatest through 24 weeks (6.1%), and decreasing thereafter (>24-48 weeks: 3.4%, >48 weeks-72 weeks: 2.0%, >72-96 weeks: 2.2%), and higher in +LD than -LD patients at each 24-week interval. Treatment with TPV/r, co-infection with hepatitis B and/or C, DAIDS grade >1 TE and CD4+ > 200 cells/mm3 at baseline were found to be independent risk factors for development of DAIDS Grade 3/4 TE; the hazard ratios (HR) were 2.8, 2.0, 2.1 and 1.5, respectively. Four of the 144 (2.7%) patients with Grade 3/4 TEs developed hepatic SAEs; overall, 14/1299 (1.1%) patients had hepatic SAEs including six with hepatic failure (0.5%). The K-M risk of developing hepatic SAEs through 96 weeks was 1.4%; highest risk was observed during the first 24 weeks and decreased thereafter; the risk was similar between +LD and -LD patients for the first 24 weeks (0.6% and 0.5%, respectively) and was higher for +LD patients, thereafter.. Through 96 weeks of TPV/r-based cART, DAIDS Grade 3/4 TEs and hepatic SAEs occurred in approximately 11% and 1% of TPV/r patients, respectively; most (84%) had no significant clinical implications and were managed without permanent treatment discontinuation. Among the 14 patients with hepatic SAE, 6 experienced hepatic failure (0.5%); these patients had profound immunosuppression and the rate appears higher among hepatitis co-infected patients. The overall probability of experiencing a hepatic SAE in this patient cohort was 1.4% through 96 weeks of treatment. Independent risk factors for DAIDS Grade 3/4 TEs include TPV/r treatment, co-infection with hepatitis B and/or C, DAIDS grade >1 TE and CD4+ > 200 cells/mm3 at baseline.. US-NIH Trial registration number: NCT00144170.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-HIV Agents; Female; Hepatitis, Viral, Human; HIV Infections; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Liver; Liver Failure; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Pyrones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Transaminases; Young Adult

To assess the 48-week efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and resistance of double boosted protease inhibitors (PI), saquinavir (SQV), and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), in children who have failed nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors /non-nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors-based regimens.. Fifty children at 2 sites in Thailand were treated with standard dosing of SQV and LPV/r. CD4, HIV-RNA viral load (VL), plasma drug concentrations and safety laboratory evaluations were monitored. Virologic failure was defined as having 2 consecutive VL >400 copies/mL after week 12 of therapy. Intention to treat analysis was performed.. Baseline data were a median age of 9.3 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.1-11.2), Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification N:A:B:C 4%:14%:68%:14%, VL 4.8 log10 (IQR: 4.5-5.1), CD4 7% (IQR: 3-9.5). At 48 weeks, 3 had died of bacterial infection but no cases had progressed CDC classification. Median CD4% rise was 9 (IQR: 5-16) and median HIV RNA reduction was -2.8 log10 (IQR: -3.2 to -1.4), both P < 0.001. Thirty-nine (78%) and 32 (64%) children had VL <400 and <50 with significant differences between the 2 sites. Five children (10%) had VL failure as a result of poor adherence to the drug regimen but no one had major PI mutations. Median serum cholesterol and triglyceride increased significantly (+35 mg/dL, +37 mg/dL, respectively, both P < 0.001). Mean minimum plasma concentrations (Cmin) of LPV and SQV were 4.6 and 1.24 mg/L, respectively.. Double boosted SQV/LPV/r resulted in significant CD4 rise and VL decline at 48 weeks. Hyperlipidemia was common. Cmin of both PIs exceeded therapeutic concentrations. Poor adherence caused failure in 10%. No major PI mutations were found.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Blood Chemical Analysis; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child; Cholesterol; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Lopinavir; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Thailand; Treatment Refusal; Triglycerides; Viral Load

Liver disease may alter the pharmacokinetics of antiretrovirals and produce changes in plasma protein binding. The aim was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of total and unbound lopinavir (LPV) in HIV-infected patients with and without hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection. Fifty-six HIV+ patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) (group I = 24 controls; II = 23 HIV/HCV-coinfected; III = 9 cirrhotic HIV/HCV-coinfected) were included. Total (n = 56) and unbound (n = 36) LPV pharmacokinetic parameters were determined at steady-state using validated high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection and high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods, respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters (plasma concentration just before drug administration, peak concentrations in plasma, times to maximum plasma concentration, areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours, and CL/F/kg) of both total and unbound LPV were calculated by standard noncompartmental methods and differences among groups evaluated (Kruskal-Wallis test).LPV apparent oral clearance normalized to body weight (median, interquartile range) was 55 (40-68), 59 (44-69), and 71 (53-78) mL/h/kg for groups I, II, and III, respectively (II vs. I, P = 0.52; III vs. I, P = 0.16). The areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours were 110.4 (80.9-135.2), 103.4 (85.5-131.3), and 92.8 (87.4-116.3) microg h/mL for groups I, II, and III, respectively (II vs. I, P = 0.68; III vs. I, P = 0.71). Chronic liver impairment produced a slight, although not significant, decrease in plasma protein binding. The free-fraction of LPV increased ( approximately 21%) from 0.97% (0.80-1.06) in HIV+/HCV- patients to 1.18% (0.89-1.65) in HIV/HCV+ cirrhotic patients. The apparent oral clearance of unbound LPV (CLu/F/kg) in cirrhotic patients did not change significantly, supporting the concept that the clearance of unbound LPV in liver disease is not affected after being inhibited by low-dose ritonavir co-administration.LPV total and unbound pharmacokinetics were not affected by hepatic impairment, suggesting that no adjustment of LPV/r dose is required for HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with and without cirrhosis and moderate impairment of liver function.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Body Weight; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Function Tests; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Ultrafiltration; Ultrasonography

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs).. A total of 272 antiretroviral-naive patients with a CD4+ T-cell count of 200-350 cells/mm3 were treated with two NRTIs and saquinavir/ritonavir 1,600/100 mg per day for > 24 weeks. Patients were followed up every 12 weeks for CD4+ T-cell counts, HIV RNA levels, clinical and laboratory toxicities. Intention-to-treat analyses were used for the first 24 weeks of treatment and as-treated analysis after week 24.. The median baseline CD4+ T-cell count was 269 cells/mm3 and HIV RNA was 4.7 log10 copies/ml. At a median follow-up time of 56 (interquartile range [IQR] 25-113) weeks, 262/272 (96.3%) had HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml, with a median HIV RNA decline of -2.89 (IQR 3.31--2.37) log10 copies/ml (P < 0.001) and a median rise in CD4+ T-cell count of 192 (IQR 117-317) cells (P < 0.001). At weeks 24, 48, 72 and 96, 249/272 (91.5%), 157/164 (95.7%), 113/126 (89.7%) and 84/90 (93.3%) had HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml, respectively; at the same time points, 83.8%, 92.7%, 85.7% and 85.6% had HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml. Drug-related adverse events were reported in 6.30%. Significant rises in total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein were seen.. First-line highly active antiretroviral therapy with once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir plus two NRTIs showed strong antiviral efficacy.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Didanosine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Thailand; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The present primary analysis of AntiRetroviral Therapy with TMC114 ExaMined In naive Subjects (ARTEMIS) compares the efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) with that of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in treatment-naive patients.. Patients with HIV-1 RNA at least 5000 copies/ml were stratified by HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell count in a phase III, open-label trial, and randomized to receive DRV/r 800/100 mg qd or LPV/r 800/200 mg total daily dose (bid or qd) plus fixed-dose tenofovir and emtricitabine for 192 weeks. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of DRV/r as compared with LPV/r in HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml per-protocol time-to-loss of virologic response at 48 weeks.. Six hundred and eighty-nine patients were randomized and treated; mean baseline HIV-1 RNA: 4.85 log10 copies/ml and median CD4 count: 225 cells/microl. At 48 weeks, 84% of DRV/r and 78% of LPV/r patients achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml (estimated difference = 5.6 [95% confidence interval -0.1-11]%), demonstrating non-inferiority of DRV/r as compared with LPV/r (P < 0.001; per-protocol time-to-loss of virologic response). Patients with HIV-1 RNA at least 100 000 copies/ml had a significantly higher response rate with DRV/r (79%) versus LPV/r (67%; P < 0.05). Median CD4 cell count increases (non-completer = failure; cells/mul) were 137 for DRV/r and 141 for LPV/r. DRV/r had a lower incidence of possibly treatment-related grade 2-4 gastrointestinal-related adverse events (7 versus 14%) and treatment-related moderate-to-severe diarrhea (4 versus 10%) than LPV/r. Adverse events leading to discontinuation were DRV/r: 3% and LPV/r: 7%.. DRV/r 800/100 mg qd was non-inferior to LPV/r 800/200 mg at 48 weeks, with a more favorable safety profile. Significantly higher response rates were observed with DRV/r in patients with HIV-1 RNA at least 100 000 copies/ml. DRV/r 800/100 mg offers a new effective and well tolerated once-daily, first-line treatment option for treatment-naive patients.

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Weight Gain

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children and adolescents who are failing antiretrovirals may have a better virologic response when drug exposures are increased, using higher protease inhibitor doses or ritonavir boosting. We studied the pharmacokinetics and safety of high-dose lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) in treatment-experienced patients, using an LPV/r dose of 400/100 mg/m(2) orally every 12 h (p.o. q12h) (without nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NNRTI]), or 480/120 mg/m(2) p.o. q12h (with NNRTI). We calculated the LPV inhibitory quotient (IQ), and when the IQ was <15, saquinavir (SQV) 750 mg/m(2) p.o. q12h was added to the regimen. We studied 26 HIV-infected patients. The median age was 15 years (range, 7 to 17), with 11.5 prior antiretroviral medications, 197 CD4 cells/ml, viral load of 75,577 copies/ml, and a 133-fold change in LPV resistance. By treatment week 2, 14 patients had a viral-load decrease of >0.75 log(10), with a median maximal decrease in viral load of -1.57 log(10) copies/ml at week 8. At week 2, 19 subjects showed a median LPV area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 157.2 (range, 62.8 to 305.5) microg x h/ml and median LPV trough concentration (C(trough)) of 10.8 (range, 4.1 to 25.3) microg/ml. In 16 subjects with SQV added, the SQV median AUC was 33.7 (range, 4.4 to 76.5) microg x h/ml and the median SQV C(trough) was 2.1 (range, 0.2 to 4.1) microg/ml. At week 24, 18 of 26 (69%) subjects remained in the study. Between weeks 24 and 48, one subject withdrew for nonadherence and nine withdrew for persistently high virus load. In antiretroviral-experienced children and adolescents with HIV, high doses of LPV/r with or without SQV offer safe options for salvage therapy, but the modest virologic response and the challenge of adherence to a regimen with a high pill burden may limit the usefulness of this approach.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome

Recent data indicate that fosamprenavir/ritonavir as part of an initial antiretroviral regimen in HIV-1-infected patients is associated with favourable efficacy and tolerability and in the KLEAN study (kaletra versus lexiva with epivir and abacavir in antiretroviral-naive patients) it was found to be non-inferior to lopinavir/ritonavir in association with abacavir/lamivudine. In our open-label, observational study conducted in 82 therapy-nasmall yi, Ukrainianve HIV-1-infected patients followed-up for 18 months, virological and immunological efficacy was comparable in subjects receiving a fosamprenavir/ritonavir-based and a lopinavir/ritonavir-based treatment (proportions of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at month 18 were 76.9% and 74.4%, respectively, when discontinuations were counted as failures). At the same time, frequency of treatment discontinuations and adverse events were similar in both groups, whereas incidence of diarrhoea and hypertriglyceridaemia was significantly higher in lopinavir-treated patients than in fosamprenavir-treated ones (53.5% vs. 25.6% and 69.8% vs. 43.6%, respectively; P < 0.01). In subjects with virological failure, no viral protease resistance mutations were detected by genotype analysis.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV-1; Humans; Hypertriglyceridemia; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Risk Factors; Ritonavir

Standard-of-care for HIV-infected patients consists of combining three antiretroviral drugs. However, other therapeutic strategies could be beneficial given long-term toxicity and quality of life (QOL) issues associated with taking multiple antiretroviral drugs for many years. In the prospective, open label, randomized, pilot monotherapy antiretroviral Kaletra (MONARK) trial among antiretroviral-naive patients, lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy was found to be less suppressive for HIV RNA than a standard triple-drug therapy of LPV/r plus zidovudine/lamivudine (on-treatment analysis after 48 weeks). We present data from the MONARK trial concerning QOL and patient-reported symptoms.. Patient-reported symptoms were collected at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48 using a list of 22 symptoms. QOL was assessed at baseline, week 24 and week 48 using the six-domain World Health Organization QOL short form questionnaire for HIV-infected individuals including an evaluation of global health perception.. Patients treated with the standard triple-drug therapy reported significantly more symptoms over 48 weeks of treatment than patients treated with LPV/r monotherapy (incidence rate ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.3 [1.1, 1.6] P=0.001 and 1.4 [1.2, 1.7] P=0.0004 for the total number of symptoms and the number of symptoms causing discomfort, respectively). No baseline differences and no significant changes were observed in the six QOL scores. The percentage of patients with a positive perception of their global health status increased significantly in the monotherapy arm from 32% at baseline to 67% at week 48 (P<0.0001).. These results suggest that the number of self-reported symptoms could be used as a treatment-sensitive measure of patients' well-being in clinical trials.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Quality of Life; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Zidovudine

This study evaluated the effects of 3 class-sparing antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens on endothelial function in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects participating in a randomized trial.. Endothelial dysfunction has been observed in patients receiving ART for HIV infection.. This was a prospective, multicenter study of treatment-naive subjects who were randomly assigned to receive a protease inhibitor-sparing regimen of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) + efavirenz, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing regimen of NRTIs + lopinavir/ritonavir, or a NRTI-sparing regimen of efavirenz + lopinavir/ritonavir. The NRTIs were lamivudine + stavudine, zidovudine, or tenofovir. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was determined by B-mode ultrasound before starting on ART, then after 4 and 24 weeks.. There were 82 subjects (median age 35 years, 91% men, 54% white). Baseline CD4 cell counts and plasma HIV ribonucleic acid (RNA) values were 245 cells/mm(3) and 4.8 log(10) copies/ml, respectively. At baseline, FMD was 3.68% (interquartile range [IQR] 1.98% to 5.51%). After 4 and 24 weeks of ART, plasma HIV RNA decreased by 2.1 and 3.0 log(10) copies/ml, respectively. FMD increased by 0.74% (IQR -0.62% to +2.74%, p = 0.003) and 1.48% (IQR -0.20% to +4.30%, p < 0.001), respectively, with similar changes in each arm (Kruskal-Wallis p value >0.600). The decrease in plasma HIV RNA at 24 weeks was associated with greater FMD (r(s) = -0.30, p = 0.017).. Among treatment-naive individuals with HIV, 3 different ART regimens rapidly improved endothelial function. Benefits were similar for all ART regimens, appeared quickly, and persisted at 24 weeks.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Brachial Artery; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Organophosphonates; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Stavudine; Tenofovir; Time Factors; Zidovudine

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Tablets; Viral Load

Atazanavir/ritonavir is as effective as lopinavir/ritonavir, with a more favourable lipid profile and less gastrointestinal toxicity, in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients. We compared these two combinations directly in treatment-naive patients.. In this open-label, international non-inferiority study, 883 antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients were randomly assigned to receive atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once daily (n=440) or lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily (n=443), in combination with fixed-dose tenofovir/emtricitabine 300/200 mg once daily. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated centralised randomisation schedule and was stratified by baseline levels of HIV RNA (viral load) and geographic region. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with viral load less than 50 copies per mL at week 48. The main efficacy analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00272779.. At week 48, 343 (78%) of 440 patients receiving atazanavir/ritonavir and 338 (76%) of 443 patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir had achieved a viral load of less than 50 copies per mL (difference 1.7%, 95% CI -3.8 to 7.1). Mean increases from baseline in CD4 cell count were similar (203 cells per muL in the atazanavir/ritonavir group vs 219 cells per muL in the lopinavir/ritonavir group). 25 (6%) patients in the atazanavir/ritonavir group and 26 (6%) in the lopinavir/ritonavir group were virological failures by week 48. Only two patients, both in the atazanavir/ritonavir group, had non-polymorphic protease inhibitor resistance mutations emerge on treatment, which conferred phenotypic resistance to atazanavir in one patient. Serious adverse events were noted in 51 (12%) of 441 patients in the atazanavir/ritonavir group and in 42 (10%) of 437 patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir group. Fewer patients in the atazanavir/ritonavir group than in the lopinavir/ritonavir group experienced grade 2-4 treatment-related diarrhoea (10 [2%] vs 50 [11%]) and nausea (17 [4%] vs 33 [8%]). Grade 2-4 jaundice was seen in 16 (4%) of 441 patients in the atazanavir/ritonavir group versus none of 437 patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir group; grade 3-4 increases in total bilirubin were seen in 146 (34%) of 435 patients on atazanavir/ritonavir and in one (<1%) of 431 patients on lopinavir/ritonavir.. In treatment-naive patients, atazanavir/ritonavir once-daily demonstrated similar antiviral efficacy to lopinavir/ritonavir twice-daily, with less gastrointestinal toxicity but with a higher rate of hyperbilirubinaemia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Viral Load

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) in HIV-1-infected pediatric patients.. Open-label randomized pediatric trial (1182.14/PACTG1051) comparing TPV/r at two doses including an optimized background regimen.. HIV-1-infected patients (2-18 years) with plasma viral load 1500 copies/ml or more were randomized to TPV/r 290/115 or 375/150 mg/m twice-daily oral solution and optimized background regimen. Week 48 efficacy, safety and tolerability results were evaluated.. Children (n = 115; 97% treatment experienced) were randomized to low or high dose therapy. Eighty-eight remained on-treatment through 48 weeks. Baseline characteristics were similar between dose groups. At study entry, half of the HIV-1 isolates were resistant to all protease inhibitors. At 48 weeks, 39.7% low-dose and 45.6% high-dose TPV/r recipients had viral load less than 400 copies/ml and 34.5 and 35.1%, respectively, achieved viral load less than 50 copies/ml. Vomiting, cough and diarrhea were the most frequent adverse events. Grade 3 alanine aminotransferase elevations were observed in 6.3% of patients. No grade 4 alanine aminotransferase or grade 3/4 aspartate aminotransferase elevations were reported.. TPV/r achieved a sustained virologic response, showed a good safety profile and was well tolerated at either dose. In pediatric patients with high baseline resistance profiles, high-dose TPV/r tended to demonstrate a better sustained response.

Topics: Adolescent; Alanine Transaminase; Anti-HIV Agents; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation Disorders; Child; Child, Preschool; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Vomiting

The objective of this study was to examine the potential of once-daily dosing with darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg in a HIV-infected, treatment-experienced patient population with no baseline darunavir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs).. Patients in the randomized controlled POWER 1 and 2 trials were treatment experienced, with > or =1 International AIDS Society-USA primary protease inhibitor (PI) mutation. The virological and immunological responses in patients with no baseline darunavir RAMs receiving darunavir/r 800/100 mg once daily (n = 23), darunavir/r 600/100 mg twice daily (n = 29), or currently available PI(s) (n = 28) plus an optimized background regimen were compared.. The proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA <50 copies per milliliter at week 24 was 67% for the group receiving darunavir/r 800/100 mg once daily and 62% for the group receiving darunavir/r 600/100 mg twice daily (P = 0.774); both were superior to control PI(s) (11%; P < 0.0001). Mean HIV RNA change from baseline was 22.39 and 22.35 log10 copies per milliliter for the group receiving darunavir/r 800/100 mg once daily and for the group receiving 600/100 mg twice daily, respectively (P = 0.895); mean CD4 increases were 88 and 111 cells per milliliter, respectively (P = 0.526).. Treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients with no baseline darunavir RAMs achieved similar high responses with darunavir/r 800/100 mg once daily and 600/100 mg twice daily. This suggests that once-daily darunavir/r 800/100 mg therapy, which has been shown effective in treatment-naive patients and is currently being studied in treatment-experienced patients, shows potential in patients with no darunavir RAMs.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Lopinavir is a protease inhibitor indicated for the treatment of HIV infection. It is coformulated with low doses of ritonavir in order to enhance its pharmacokinetic profile. After oral administration, plasma concentrations of lopinavir can vary widely between different HIV-infected patients.. To develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model for lopinavir and ritonavir administered simultaneously in a population of HIV-infected adults. The model sought was to incorporate patient characteristics influencing variability in the drug concentration and the interaction between the two compounds.. HIV-infected adults on stable therapy with oral lopinavir/ritonavir in routine clinical practice for at least 4 weeks were included. A concentration-time profile was obtained for each patient, and blood samples were collected immediately before and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours after a morning lopinavir/ritonavir dose. Lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations in plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. First, a population pharmacokinetic model was developed for lopinavir and for ritonavir separately. The pharmacokinetic parameters, interindividual variability and residual error were estimated, and the influence of different patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir was explored. Then, a simultaneous model estimating the pharmacokinetics of both drugs together and incorporating the influence of ritonavir exposure on oral clearance (CL/F) of lopinavir was developed. Population analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM version V software). The bias and precision of the final model were assessed through Monte Carlo simulations and data-splitting techniques.. A total of 53 and 25 Caucasian patients were included in two datasets for model building and model validation, respectively. Lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics were described by one-compartment models with first-order absorption and elimination. The presence of advanced liver fibrosis decreased CL/F of ritonavir by nearly half. The volume of distribution after oral administration (Vd/F) and CL/F of lopinavir were reduced as alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) concentrations increased. CL/F of lopinavir was inhibited by ritonavir concentrations following a maximum-effect model (maximum inhibition [Imax] = 1, concentration producing 50% of the I(max) [IC50] = 0.36 mg/L). The final model appropriately predicted plasma concentrations in the model-validation dataset with no systematic bias and adequate precision.. A population model to simultaneously describe the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir was developed and validated in HIV-infected patients. Bayesian estimates of the individual parameters of ritonavir and lopinavir could be useful to predict lopinavir exposure based on the presence of advanced liver fibrosis and the AAG concentration in an individual manner, with the aim of maximizing the chances of treatment success.

Topics: Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Models, Biological; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Enfuvirtide is the first fusion and entry inhibitor approved for use for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 infection and as such represents a novel class of agents. For the population of patients experienced with three antiretroviral classes, enfuvirtide provides an additional option for treatment. This prospective, open-label, 24-week, single-arm trial assessed the efficacy and safety of enfuvirtide (90 mg injected subcutaneously twice daily) in combination with darunavir-ritonavir (600/100 mg administered orally twice daily) in triple-antiretroviral-class-experienced adults failing their current regimen. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants with plasma HIV RNA loads of <50 copies/ml. Other virological and immunological measures were also evaluated, as were the effects of the baseline viral coreceptor tropism and darunavir phenotype sensitivity scores on the outcomes. At week 24, 60.3%, 72.5%, and 84.0% of 131 participants achieved viral loads of <50 copies/ml and <400 copies/ml and a change from the baseline load of > or =1 log(10) copies/ml, respectively. A baseline viral load of < or =5 log(10) copies/ml was a significant predictor of achieving a viral load of <50 copies/ml at 24 weeks; however, neither background genotype sensitivity nor darunavir phenotype sensitivity was a significant predictor of the achievement of viral loads of <50 copies/ml. Although these findings are limited by the relatively small numbers of participants with darunavir susceptibility changes of > or =10-fold, they suggest that combining enfuvirtide and darunavir-ritonavir with an optimized background regimen in triple-class experienced participants naïve to these agents can result in positive virological and immunological responses regardless of most baseline parameters.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; Female; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model in order to describe ritonavir-boosted saquinavir concentrations dosed twice and once daily in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients from the UK, Uganda and Thailand and to identify factors that may influence saquinavir pharmacokinetics.. Pharmacokinetic data from 10 clinical studies were combined. Non-linear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM version V) was applied to determine the saquinavir pharmacokinetic parameters, interindividual/interoccasion variability (IIV/IOV) and residual error. Various covariates potentially related to saquinavir pharmacokinetics were explored, and the final model was validated by means of 95% prediction interval and testing the predictive performance of the model with data not included in the model-building process.. Ninety-seven patients were included from the UK (n = 52), Uganda (n = 18) and Thailand (n = 27), contributing 347 saquinavir profiles (1-14 profiles per patient). A one-compartment model with zero-order absorption and lag-time best described the data with IIV/IOV on apparent oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F) and with IIV on duration and absorption lag-time. The ritonavir area under the curve over the dosing interval was significantly associated with saquinavir CL/F and V/F. A typical patient from the UK had approximately 1.5- and 3-fold higher saquinavir CL/F compared with patients from Uganda (89.0 versus 49.8 L/h) and Thailand (89.0 versus 26.7 L/h), respectively.. A model to characterize ritonavir-boosted saquinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected adults has been developed and validated. The model could be used for dosage adaptation following therapeutic drug monitoring and to assess patients' suitability for once-daily boosted saquinavir therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Models, Theoretical; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Serum; Thailand; Uganda; United Kingdom

Data from two Phase IIb trials, POWER 1 and 2 (TMC114-C213 and C202), were pooled to examine the effect of baseline viral susceptibility on response to control protease inhibitors [CPI(s)] compared with response to darunavir (TMC114) given with low-dose ritonavir (darunavir/r) in treatment-experienced HIV patients. POWER 1 and 2 were randomized, controlled Phase IIb trials with a similar design. Patients with one or more primary PI mutations and HIV-1 RNA >1000 copies/ml were randomized to receive an optimized background regimen plus darunavir/r or CPI(s). POWER 1 and 2 week 24 efficacy (intent-to-treat using time-to-loss of virologic response algorithm) data were pooled and analyzed according to baseline subgroups of susceptibility to the CPI regimen, fold-change (FC) in EC(50) to darunavir, and number of darunavir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). In total, 131 patients received darunavir/r 600/100 mg twice daily; 124 received CPI(s) [lopinavir/r, 20%; saquinavir/r, 19%; (fos)-amprenavir/r, 24%; atazanavir/r, 11%; and 23% used dual-boosted CPI(s)]. At baseline, 72% of patients were resistant (defined as FC) to their investigator-selected CPIs. At week 24, darunavir/r 600/100 mg twice daily provided greater efficacy benefits over CPI(s), even when the virus was predicted to be fully susceptible to the CPI. The response to darunavir decreased when FC to darunavir at baseline was >40 or when three or more darunavir RAMs (in addition to other PI mutations) were present at baseline. Darunavir/r 600/100 mg twice daily showed efficacy benefits over CPI use regardless of viral susceptibility at baseline, FC to darunavir or boosting type in a population of treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutation, Missense; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The aim of this study was to identify human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease mutations associated with virological response (VR) to fosamprenavir-ritonavir (FPV/r) in 113 protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients randomized in both CONTEXT and TRIAD clinical trials and receiving the same dose (700/100 mg twice daily) of FPV/r. The impact of each protease mutation on the VR to FPV/r, defined as the decrease in HIV RNA at week 12, was investigated with nonparametric analyses. A step-by-step procedure was done using a Jonckheere-Terpstra (JT) test that retains the group of mutations most strongly associated with the VR. Mutations at the following 14 codons were associated with a reduced VR to FPV/r: 10, 15, 33, 46, 54, 60, 62, 63, 72, 73, 82, 84, 89, and 90. The JT procedure led to selecting the CONTEXT/TRIAD genotypic set of mutations, I15V, M46I/L, I54L/M/V, D60E, L63P/T, and I84V, as providing the strongest association with the VR (P = 1.45 x 10(-11)). In the nine patients with zero mutations within this set, the median decrease in HIV RNA was -2.63 log copies/ml, and was -2.22 (n = 45), -1.50 (n = 26), -0.58 (n = 23), -0.47 (n = 6), -0.13 (n = 3), and 0.04 (n = 1) log copies/ml in those with one, two, three, four, five, and six mutations, respectively. This study identified six mutations associated with VR to FPV/r. Some of these mutations are shared with the current FPV/r Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS) resistance score, which has been cross-validated in the CONTEXT/TRIAD data set, suggesting that the current ANRS FPV/r score is a useful tool for the prediction of VR to FPV/r in PI-experienced patients.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Furans; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutation; Organophosphates; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Thymidine-based nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors and some protease inhibitors of HIV are associated with lipoatrophy, relative central fat accumulation and insulin resistance. The latter associations have not been well evaluated prospectively in adults commencing antiretroviral therapy. We studied the effects of protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimens on body composition, insulin sensitivity and adipocytokine levels.. 48-week substudy of a randomized, open-label, three-arm trial.. Hospital and community HIV clinics.. 140 HIV-infected adults naive to antiretroviral therapy.. Tipranavir/ritonavir [500/200 mg twice a day (TPV/r200)] or [500/100 mg twice a day (TPV/r100)] or lopinavir/ritonavir [400/100 mg twice a day (LPV/r)], each with tenofovir + lamivudine.. Body composition [dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for limb fat; L4, abdominal computed tomography for visceral adipose tissue (VAT)]; and fasting metabolic parameters. The primary analysis was change in limb fat mass in each TPV/r group vs. LPV/r.. Limb fat increased in all three groups: LPV/r (1.17 kg) versus TPV/r200 (0.83 kg; P = 0.16) and TPV/r100 (0.41 kg; P = 0.07). VAT decreased in all groups: LPV/r (-3 cm) vs. TPV/r200 (-9 cm; P = 0.04) and TPV/r100 (-6 cm; P = 0.40). No significant change in insulin sensitivity was observed, including by oral glucose tolerance testing. The increase in leptin levels was significantly correlated with the increase in limb fat mass (r = 0.67; P < 0.0001). Despite increased limb fat, adiponectin levels increased, but significantly more with TPV/r200 (+6010 ng/ml; P < 0.0001) or TPV/r100 (+4497 ng/ml; P = 0.002) when compared with LPV/r (+1360 ng/ml).. Unlike many other antiretroviral regimens, TPV/r or LPV/r with tenofovir-lamivudine increased subcutaneous fat without evidence for increasing visceral fat or insulin resistance over 48 weeks.

Topics: Adiponectin; Adult; Body Composition; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Lopinavir; Male; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus infection is occasionally associated with poor immunologic responses despite full suppression of viral replication. As some combinations of nucleoside analogues (NA) have been associated with paradoxical depletion of CD4(+) T- cells, we postulated that depleting the antiretroviral regimen of NAs would improve quantitative immunological parameters. In a longitudinal prospective study we quantified CD4(+) T-cells after removing NAs from antiretroviral therapy. The NA for regimen consisted of atazanavir (300 mg qd), saquinavir (1000 mg bid), and ritonavir (100mg qd) in 14 patients with immunologic failure despite undetectable plasma HIV-RNA (CD4(+) T-cells < 250 cells/microL (<17%) HIV RNA, <= 50 copies/mL). Additionally, we assessed the state of immunologic activation markers (CD38(+)HLA-DR(+) on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cells) by flow cytometry. The regimen was well tolerated. During the 48 week study CD4(+) T-cell counts improved significantly (mean and +/- SEM [standard error of mean], baseline: 174/microL (12.4%) [15, 5.8%], week 24: 232/microL (14%) [26, 5.3%], week 48: 267/microL (15.4%) [34, 4.3%]) with preservation of full viral suppression (p<0.05). Activation parameters of CD4(+) T-cells, but not of CD8(+) T-cells, decreased significantly. This treatment strategy may represent an option for patients with poor immunologic responses to antiretroviral therapy despite undetectable viremia.

Topics: ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1; Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Female; Flow Cytometry; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HLA-DR Antigens; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Membrane Glycoproteins; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; T-Lymphocyte Subsets; Viral Load

In countries with a high seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), HIV infection contributes significantly to infant mortality. We investigated antiretroviral-treatment strategies in the Children with HIV Early Antiretroviral Therapy (CHER) trial.. HIV-infected infants 6 to 12 weeks of age with a CD4 lymphocyte percentage (the CD4 percentage) of 25% or more were randomly assigned to receive antiretroviral therapy (lopinavir-ritonavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine) when the CD4 percentage decreased to less than 20% (or 25% if the child was younger than 1 year) or clinical criteria were met (the deferred antiretroviral-therapy group) or to immediate initiation of limited antiretroviral therapy until 1 year of age or 2 years of age (the early antiretroviral-therapy groups). We report the early outcomes for infants who received deferred antiretroviral therapy as compared with early antiretroviral therapy.. At a median age of 7.4 weeks (interquartile range, 6.6 to 8.9) and a CD4 percentage of 35.2% (interquartile range, 29.1 to 41.2), 125 infants were randomly assigned to receive deferred therapy, and 252 infants were randomly assigned to receive early therapy. After a median follow-up of 40 weeks (interquartile range, 24 to 58), antiretroviral therapy was initiated in 66% of infants in the deferred-therapy group. Twenty infants in the deferred-therapy group (16%) died versus 10 infants in the early-therapy groups (4%) (hazard ratio for death, 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11 to 0.51; P<0.001). In 32 infants in the deferred-therapy group (26%) versus 16 infants in the early-therapy groups (6%), disease progressed to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stage C or severe stage B (hazard ratio for disease progression, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.41; P<0.001). Stavudine was substituted for zidovudine in four infants in the early-therapy groups because of neutropenia in three infants and anemia in one infant; no drugs were permanently discontinued. After a review by the data and safety monitoring board, the deferred-therapy group was modified, and infants in this group were all reassessed for initiation of antiretroviral therapy.. Early HIV diagnosis and early antiretroviral therapy reduced early infant mortality by 76% and HIV progression by 75%. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00102960.)

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Treatment Failure; Zidovudine

Ritonavir is a powerful inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) that metabolizes many antiretrovirals. We examined the effect of ritonavir and of chronic viral hepatitis (CVH) status on CYP3A activity.. Twenty-six HIV-positive men (13 with CVH, 16 on chronic ritonavir-based highly active antiretroviral therapy) received oral and intravenous midazolam, a probe for CYP3A phenotypic activity.. CYP3A activity was expressed as oral clearance of the midazolam probe. In HIV-positive subjects not on ritonavir, CYP3A activity (mean +/- SD) did not differ between subjects by CVH (no CVH, controls: 28.5 +/- 9.0 vs. CVH+: 23.2 +/- 6.2 mL/min/kg, not significant). In those on ritonavir (R), CYP3A activity was 7% of controls (R: 2.1 +/- 0.8 vs. no R 28.5 +/- 9.0 mL/min/kg, P < 0.0004). CYP3A activity in subjects on ritonavir and with CVH was further reduced to 4% of controls (no CVH, R+ 2.1 +/- 0.8 vs. R+, CVH+ 1.0 +/- 0.4 mL/min/kg, P < 0.006).. Ritonavir markedly decreases CYP3A activity. In the presence of CVH, ritonavir-based therapy further reduces CYP3A activity by half. Coinfection with CVH impairs CYP3A activity in the presence of the CYP3A inhibitor ritonavir.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; GABA Modulators; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Midazolam; Middle Aged; Ritonavir

The ARTEMIS study compared the efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir at once-daily doses of 800/100 mg versus once- or twice-daily doses of lopinavir/ritonavir, together with 300 mg of tenofovir and 200 mg of emtricitabine, both in once-daily doses, in treatment-naive patients. The results at 48 weeks show that darunavir/ritonavir is not inferior to lopinavir/ritonavir; the increase in CD4 count observed with both regimens was similar. Darunavir/ritonavir was superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with high viral loads (>100,000 copies/mL). The use of darunavir/ritonavir was associated with a lower proportion of grades 2-4 adverse effects, especially gastrointestinal effects such as diarrhea and with a lower frequency of lipidic adverse effects, such as increased triglyceride and total cholesterol levels. Once-daily darunavir/ritonavir may be an option in first-line antiretroviral therapy, with the added advantage of a reduced dose of ritonavir and high efficacy in patients with elevated viral loads.

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyslipidemias; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) has been the gold standard in first line rescue treatment for many years. No other boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) has managed to demonstrate that it is superior to LPV/r. In this regard, the TITAN study compared the efficacy and safety of darunavir (DRV/r) in 595 patients, at a dose of 600/100 mg two times a day against the normal LPV/r dose, combined with at least 2 other optimised antiretroviral drugs. The efficacy of the treatment at 48 weeks (VL<400 copies/mL) was significantly higher in the DRV/r goup compared to the LPV/r group, both in the analysis by protocol (77% vs. 68%), the non-inferiority of DRV/r being demonstrated (estimated difference +9%, 95% CI 2-16), and by intention to treat (77% vs. 67%), the superiority of DRV/r being demonstrated (estimated difference 10%, 95% CI 2-17%). The incidence of diarrhoea and increase in triglycerides was higher in the LPV/r group. The differences in efficacy of both treatments in favour of DRV/r started to be seen from a basal primary mutation in the protease, with these differences increasing as the number of these mutations increased. In patients with virological failure, DRV/r protected the protease and reverse transcriptase against mutations, thus preserving future therapeutic options. We have some theoretical and clinical data available that enables us to consider the possibility of administering DRV/r once a day in some patients with a few mutations in the protease and in those where this dosing regime is considered important. With the results of the TITAN study, DRV/r must be considered the new gold standard in first line rescue, at least in those patients with a primary mutation in the protease.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Clinical Trials as Topic; Darunavir; Diarrhea; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Lopinavir; Male; Prognosis; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Mutation; Protease Inhibitors; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

We determined the effects of lopinavir/ritonavir on tenofovir renal clearance. Human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects taking tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) were matched on age, race, and gender and were enrolled into one of the following two groups: group 1: subjects taking TDF plus lopinavir/ritonavir plus other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs); group 2: subjects taking TDF plus NRTIs and/or non-NRTIs but no protease inhibitors. Twenty-four-hour blood and urine collections were carried out in subjects for tenofovir quantification. Drug transporter genotype associations with tenofovir pharmacokinetics were examined. In 30 subjects, median (range) tenofovir apparent oral clearance, renal clearance, and fraction excreted in urine were 34.6 l/h (20.6-89.5), 11.3 l/h (6.2-22.6), and 0.33 (0.23-0.5), respectively. After adjusting for renal function, tenofovir renal clearance was 17.5% slower (P=0.04) in subjects taking lopinavir/ritonavir versus those not taking a protease inhibitor, consistent with a renal interaction between these drugs. Future studies should clarify the exact mechanism and whether there is an increased risk of nephrotoxicity.

Topics: Adenine; Administration, Oral; Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Case-Control Studies; Drug Interactions; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Kidney; Lopinavir; Male; Membrane Transport Proteins; Middle Aged; Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2; Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins; Organic Anion Transport Protein 1; Organophosphonates; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

We investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of saquinavir/ritonavir when administered with omeprazole simultaneously and 2 h apart to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) subjects. Saquinavir/ritonavir 12-h pharmacokinetics was assessed with and without omeprazole 40 mg. Subjects were randomized to group A (saquinavir/ritonavir and omeprazole simultaneously/2 h apart) or group B (saquinavir/ritonavir and omeprazole 2 h apart/simultaneously). Saquinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics was assessed on days 1, 8, and 22. Within-subject changes were evaluated by geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence interval (CI). Twelve subjects completed the study. GM (90% CI) for saquinavir area under the curve (AUC)(0-12) (ng h/ml), trough concentration (C(trough)) (ng/ml), and maximum concentration (C(max)) (ng/ml) were 14,698 (13,242-20,636), 433 (368-758), 2,513 (2,243-3,329) without omeprazole; 22,646 (18,536-131,861), 750 (619-1,280), 3,890 (3,223-5,133) with omeprazole simultaneously; and 24,549 (20,884-38,894), 851 (720-1,782), 4,141 (3,554-5,992) with omeprazole 2 h earlier. Simultaneous administration of omeprazole significantly increased saquinavir AUC(0-12), C(trough), and C(max) by 54, 73, and 55%, whereas staggered administration by 67, 97, and 65%. No grade 3/4 toxicity or lab abnormalities were observed. In the presence of omeprazole, saquinavir plasma exposure is significantly increased in HIV-infected subjects whether administered simultaneously or 2 h apart.

Topics: Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Headache; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Omeprazole; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Atazanavir (ATV), the first once-daily protease inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, is recommended for use in antiretroviral (ARV) treatment-naive and -experienced patients. Study AI424-089 was a prospective, randomized, open-label, 96-week study comparing 2 ATV-based treatment regimens in ARV-naive HIV-infected patients.. Adults with HIV RNA levels > or =2000 copies/mL were randomized (1:1) to once-daily ATV at a dose of 300 mg with ritonavir at a dose of 100 mg (ATV300/RTV) or ATV at a dose of 400 mg (ATV400); both regimens included lamivudine and an investigational extended-release formulation of stavudine. The primary endpoint for this noninferiority study was the proportion of patients (response rate) with an HIV RNA load <400 copies/mL at week 48.. Response rates at week 48 were 86% and 85% on the ATV300/RTV and ATV400 regimens, respectively (difference estimate [95% confidence interval] = 1.5 [-8.2 to 11.1]). There were 3 and 10 patients with virologic failure in the ATV300/RTV and ATV400 groups, respectively. One patient (ATV400) developed phenotypic resistance to ATV associated with an I50L substitution. Adverse event-related discontinuations were 8% among ATV300/RTV-treated patients and <1% among ATV400-treated patients. Plasma lipid elevations were low with both regimens. Both regimens were well tolerated.. These findings demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the ATV300/RTV regimen and confirm the safety and efficacy of ATV400 in an ARV-naive patient population.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Amino Acid Substitution; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lipids; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Stavudine; Viral Load; Withholding Treatment

Currently, comparative data able to define the potency of boosted versus unboosted atazanavir in highly pretreated HIV-infected patients are limited. Specifically, in clinical practice it is very important to establish whether atazanavir-boosting with ritonavir warrants potency and efficacy that overcome the profile of unboosted drug. For this reason, our goal was to evaluate viro-immunologic determinants of response to atazanavir, in unboosted ATV400 or boosted ATV300/r formulation, from baseline to week 48 in highly pretreated HIV-infected patients enrolled in a prospective observational Italian study. Data from 354 patients included in an atazanavir "Early Access Program" (AI424-900) with baseline viremia 500 copies per milliliter or more and with an available virologic follow-up were examined using as-treated analysis. Of these, 200 (56.5%) and 154 (43.5%), respectively, received regimens containing ATV300/r or ATV400. Virologic success (VS) was defined as reaching viremia of less than 500 copies per milliliter during follow-up. Estimated median time to VS was 8 weeks in the ATV300/r group and 13 weeks in the ATV400 group. Proportion of patients achieving VS was higher in the ATV300/r group than in ATV400 group at week 12 (66% versus 47%), as well as at week 48 (86% versus 64%). At multivariate Cox regression, receiving ATV300/r dosing was independently associated with increased probability of achieving VS [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-2.06]. Conversely, CDC stage C, higher baseline viral load, and more experience with protease inhibitors (PIs) were associated with poorer virologic response. In an unselected population of highly pretreated HIV-infected individuals, receiving atazanavir as part of antiretroviral regimen results in effective virologic response and immunologic recovery. The antiviral efficacy of atazanavir is greater when boosted with low-dose ritonavir.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cohort Studies; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Viremia

Prior attempts to reduce the number of drugs needed to maintain viral suppression in patients with suppressed HIV replication while receiving three antiretroviral drugs have been unsuccessful.. In 205 patients with suppressed HIV replication on lopinavir-ritonavir and two nucleosides, this randomized, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial compared the strategies of continuation of triple therapy versus lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy followed by reinduction with two nucleosides if virological rebound occurred without genotypic resistance to lopinavir-ritonavir. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients without therapeutic failure, defined as confirmed HIV RNA higher than 500 copies/mL (with exclusion of patients receiving monotherapy who resuppressed to < 50 copies/mL after resuming baseline nucleosides), or loss to follow-up, or change of randomized therapy other than reinduction.. At week 48, the percentage of patients without therapeutic failure was 94% in the monotherapy group versus 90% in the triple therapy group (difference,-4%; upper limit of 95% confidence interval for difference, 3.4%). The percentage of patients with HIV RNA 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks by intention-to-treat, missing data or reinductions considered as failures, were 85% in the monotherapy group versus 90% in the triple therapy group (P = 0.31; 95% upper limit of 95% confidence interval for difference, 14%).. In this trial, 48 weeks of lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy with reintroduction of nucleosides as needed was non-inferior to continuation of two nucleosides and lopinavir-ritonavir in patients with prior stable suppression. However, episodes of low level viremia were more common in patients receiving monotherapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nucleosides; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Spain; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

To investigate pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-based therapy in HIV-1-infected infants 6 weeks to 6 months of age.. A prospective, multicenter, open-label trial of 21 infants with HIV-1 RNA > 10 000 copies/ml and treated with LPV/r 300/75 mg/m twice daily plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed at 2 weeks and predose concentrations were collected every 8 weeks; safety and plasma HIV-1 RNA were monitored every 4-12 weeks for 24 weeks.. Median age at enrollment was 14.7 weeks (range, 6.9-25.7) and 19/21 completed > or= 24 weeks of study. Although LPV/r apparent clearance was slightly higher than in older children, the median area under the concentration-time curve 0-12 h (67.5 mug.h/ml) was in the range reported from older children taking the recommended dose of 230/57.5 mg/m. Predose concentrations stabilized at a higher level after the first 2 weeks of study. In as-treated analysis at week 24, 10/19 (53%) had plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/ml (median change, -3.33 log10 copies/ml); poor adherence contributed to delayed viral suppression, which improved with longer follow-up. Three infants (14%) had transient adverse events of grade 3 or more that were possibly related to study treatment but did not require permanent treatment discontinuation.. Despite higher clearance in infants 6 weeks to 6 months of age, a twice daily dose of 300/75 mg/m LPV/r provided similar exposure to that in older children, was well tolerated and provided favorable virological and clinical efficacy.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Brazil; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; United States

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic compatibility of a ritonavir-boosted indinavir-fosamprenavir combination among patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).. Single-center, nonrandomized, prospective, multiple-dose, two-phase pharmacokinetic study.. University research center.. Eight adult patients with HIV infection who had been receiving and tolerating indinavir 800 mg-ritonavir 100 mg twice/day for at least 2 weeks. Intervention. After 12-hour pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on all patients (period A), fosamprenavir (a prodrug of amprenavir) 700 mg twice/day was coadministered for 5 days, with a repeat 12-hour pharmacokinetic sampling performed on the fifth day (period B).. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for indinavir, ritonavir, and amprenavir: area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 12 hours after dosing (AUC(0-12)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), and 12-hour plasma concentration (C(12)). For each parameter, the geometric mean, as well as the geometric mean ratio (GMR) comparing period B with period A, were calculated. Indinavir C(max) was lowered by 20% (GMR 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.96), AUC(0-12) was lowered by 6% (GMR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.21), and C(12) was increased by 28% (GMR 1.28, 95% CI 0.78-2.10). Ritonavir AUC(0-12) was 20% lower (GMR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54-1.19), C(max) was 15% lower (GMR 0.85, 95% CI 0.55-1.32), and C(12) was 7% lower (GMR 0.93, 95% CI 0.49-1.76). With the exception of indinavir C(max), the changes in indinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters observed after fosamprenavir coadministration were not statistically significant. The geometric means of amprenavir AUC(0-12), C(max), and C(12) were 41,517 ng*hour/ml (95% CI 30,317-56,854 ng*hr/ml), 5572 ng/ml (95% CI 4330-7170 ng/ml), and 2421 ng/ml (95% CI 1578-3712 ng/ml), respectively.. The combination of indinavir 800 mg-ritonavir 100 mg-fosamprenavir 700 mg twice/day appears to be devoid of a clinically significant drug-drug interaction and should be evaluated as an alternative regimen in salvage HIV treatment. This combination may be suitable as part of a background regimen to optimize the therapeutic benefit of newer classes of antiretroviral agents such as the integrase and coreceptor inhibitors in the treatment of multidrug-resistant viruses.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Carbamates; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; Half-Life; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Prodrugs; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Given the limited treatment options for patients with high-level resistance, antiretroviral (ARV) regimens based on concomitant use of 2 ritonavir (RTV)-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) were considered a therapeutic option.. Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) study 1182.51 examined the pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and efficacy of RTV-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r), alone and in combination with comparator PIs (CPIs) in 315 triple-class-experienced, HIV-infected patients.. Two weeks after single PI therapy, the addition of TPV/r reduced plasma trough levels 52%, 80%, and 56% for lopinavir (LPV), saquinavir (SQV), and amprenavir (APV) recipients, respectively. After 2 weeks, a TPV/r-only regimen reduced HIV viral load (VL) by a median of 1.06 log(10) copies/mL. VL reductions at 2 weeks between single-boosted CPIs were difficult to compare, because the numbers of patients maintaining their previous failing PI after randomization were different. At week 4, patients initiating treatment with TPV-containing regimens sustained VL reduction (median decrease of 1.27 log(10) copies/mL). Patients adding TPV to regimens at week 2 achieved median reductions from a baseline of 1.19 log(10), 0.96 log(10), and 1.12 log(10) copies/mL at week 4 in dual-boosted LPV, SQV, and APV groups, respectively. At 24 weeks, VL reductions (median: -0.24 to -0.47 log(10) copies/mL) were comparable between treatment groups.. The efficacy of a dual PI regimen depended on the presence of TPV, with additional recycled CPIs having limited activity, even in drug-resistant patient populations with plasma trough concentrations regarded as likely to be adequate in this study. No clear guidelines exist about ARV plasma trough concentrations in treatment-experienced patients, however.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Diarrhea; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatigue; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Nausea; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to quantify the inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP3A), CYP2D6, and P-glycoprotein in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients receiving an antiretroviral therapy (ART) containing ritonavir boosted lopinavir, and to identify factors influencing ritonavir and lopinavir pharmacokinetics. We measured activities of CYP3A, CYP2D6, and P-glycoprotein in 28 patients before and during ART using a cocktail phenotyping approach. Activities, demographics, and genetic polymorphisms in CYP3A, CYP2D6, and P-glycoprotein were tested as covariates. Oral midazolam clearance (overall CYP3A activity) decreased to 0.19-fold (90% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.23), hepatic midazolam clearance and intestinal midazolam availability changed to 0.24-fold (0.20-0.29) and 1.12-fold (1.00-1.26), respectively. In CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers, the plasma ratio AUC(dextromethorphan)/AUC(dextrorphan) increased to 2.92-fold (2.31-3.69). Digoxin area under the curve (AUC)(0-12) (P-glycoprotein activity) increased to 1.81-fold (1.56-2.09). Covariates had no major influence on lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics. In conclusion, CYP3A, CYP2D6, and P-glycoprotein are profoundly inhibited in patients receiving ritonavir boosted lopinavir. The covariates investigated are not useful for a priori dose selection.

Topics: Adult; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Drug Synergism; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Intestines; Liver; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Induction-maintenance strategies were associated with a low response rate. We compared the virological response with two different induction regimens with trizivir plus efavirenz or lopinavir/ritonavir.. A randomized, multicentre, open-label clinical trial with 209 antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients assigned to trizivir plus either efavirenz or lopinavir/ritonavir during 24-36 weeks. Patients reaching undetectable plasma viral loads during induction entered a 48-week maintenance on trizivir alone. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without treatment failure at 72 weeks using an intent to treat (ITT) analysis (switching equals failure).. Patients were randomly assigned (efavirenz 104; lopinavir/ritonavir 105), and 114 (55%) entered the maintenance phase (efavirenz 54; lopinavir/ritonavir 60). Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. The response rate at 72 weeks was 31 and 43% (ITT analysis, P = 0.076) and 63 and 75% (on-treatment analysis, P = 0.172) in the efavirenz and lopinavir/ritonavir arms, respectively. Virological failure occurred in 27 patients: six during induction (efavirenz, three; lopinavir/ritonavir, three; P = 1.0) and 21 during maintenance (efavirenz, 14; lopinavir/ritonavir, seven; P = 0.057). Thirty-four patients in the efavirenz arm switched treatment because of adverse events compared with 25 in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm (P = 0.17).. Trizivir plus either efavirenz or lopinavir/ritonavir followed by maintenance with trizivir achieved a low but similar response at 72 weeks, with a high incidence of adverse events leading to drug discontinuation during the induction phase in both arms. The study showed a trend towards an increased virological failure rate in the efavirenz arm during the maintenance phase.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Zidovudine

Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents for HIV-1 infection recommend combining at least three agents. The toxicity, cost, and complexity of such regimens warrant the search for other options.. MONARK is a prospective, open-label, randomized, 96-week trial comparing the safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy with a standard lopinavir/ritonavir plus zidovudine and lamivudine regimen as an initial treatment regimen in HIV-infected patients with HIV-RNA levels less than 100,000 copies/ml. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-1-RNA levels below 400 copies/ml at week 24 and below 50 copies/ml at week 48.. Eight-three and 53 patients were randomly assigned and exposed in the monotherapy and triple-drug groups, respectively. At week 48, by an intent-to-treat analysis, 53 of 83 patients (64%) in the monotherapy group and 40 of 53 patients (75%) in the triple-drug group achieved the primary endpoint (P = 0.19). The on-treatment analysis indicates that 80 and 95% of patients reached the primary endpoint in the monotherapy and triple-drug groups, respectively (P = 0.02). In the monotherapy arm, protease inhibitor-associated resistance mutations were seen in three of the 21 patients qualifying for genotypic resistance testing, with a modest impact on lopinavir susceptibility. None of the serious reported adverse events were considered to be related to study treatment.. Our results suggest that lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy demonstrates lower rates of virological suppression when compared with lopinavir/ritonavir triple therapy and therefore should not be considered as a preferred treatment option for widespread use in antiretroviral-naive patients.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Zidovudine

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a twice daily regimen containing 400 mg of indinavir and 100 mg of ritonavir in 32 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women during pregnancy. The median indinavir trough concentration was 208 ng/ml during the third trimester. At delivery, 26 of 28 women on indinavir-ritonavir had HIV RNA levels of <200 copies/ml. No infant was HIV infected. These data are encouraging for the use of this combination for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Outcome; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

The inhibitory quotient (IQ) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (PIs), which is the ratio of drug concentration to viral susceptibility, is considered to be predictive of the virological response. We used several approaches to calculate the IQs of amprenavir and lopinavir in a subset of heavily pretreated patients participating in the French National Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS) 104 trial and then compared their potentials for predicting changes in the plasma HIV RNA level. Thirty-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive either amprenavir (600 mg twice a day [BID]) or lopinavir (400 mg BID) plus ritonavir (100 or 200 mg BID) for 2 weeks before combining the two PIs. The 90% inhibitory concentration (IC(90)) was measured using a recombinant assay without or with additional human serum (IC(90+serum)). Total and unbound PI concentrations in plasma were measured. Univariate linear regression was used to estimate the relation between the change in viral load and the IC(90) or IQ values. The amprenavir phenotypic IQ values were very similar when measured with the standard and protein binding-adjusted IC(90)s. No relationship was found between the viral load decline and the lopinavir IQ. During combination therapy, the amprenavir and lopinavir genotypic IQ values were predictive of the viral response at week 6 (P = 0.03). The number of protease mutations (< 5 or > or = 5) was related to the virological response throughout the study. These findings suggest that the combined genotypic IQ and the number of protease mutations are the best predictors of virological response. High amprenavir and lopinavir concentrations in these patients might explain why plasma concentrations and the phenotypic IQ have poor predictive value.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Carbamates; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; France; Furans; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Phenotype; Prognosis; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) with protease inhibitors (PIs) is associated with insulin resistance, triglyceride-rich dyslipidemia, and fat redistribution. Atazanavir (ATV), a potent once-daily PI, has been recognized for its convenience to patients, and some studies describe improved lipid metabolism. However, its effects on insulin sensitivity have not been elucidated. We conducted this study to test the hypothesis that ATV improves insulin resistance and dyslipidemia.. We prospectively studied 9 HIV-infected men with dyslipidemia (median age, 53 years; baseline triglyceride level, >200 mg/dL) on stable PI-containing antiretroviral therapy who elected to change PI therapy to ritonavir-boosted ATV therapy, dose of 300/100 mg. We measured insulin resistance at baseline and after 12 weeks of therapy using a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (insulin dose, 200 mU/m minute). Fasting lipid profiles and body composition (whole-body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry) were also measured at baseline and after 12 weeks.. All 9 patients completed the study and maintained undetectable viral loads (<50 copies/mL) and stable CD4 counts. After 12 weeks, insulin sensitivity significantly improved (+28%; P = 0.008) in all patients. Triglyceride levels also improved.. Using the gold-standard euglycemic clamp, ritonavir-boosted ATV therapy improved PI-induced insulin resistance among dyslipidemic HIV-infected men on PI-based antiretroviral therapy. These findings were not attributable to a change in body weight and provide further evidence for ATV's unique metabolic profile among the PIs.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Atazanavir Sulfate; Body Composition; Dyslipidemias; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Brazil; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Stavudine is widely used in Thailand and is associated with mitochondrial toxicity. Here, we evaluated the effect of switching from stavudine/didanosine to tenofovir/lamivudine on measures of metabolic and mitochondrial toxicity in Thai patients.. Thirty-five Thai patients with full HIV RNA suppression were switched from stavudine/didanosine to tenofovir/lamivudine while receiving saquinavir/ritonavir 1600/100 mg once daily. Patients were assessed at the time of switch and 24 and 48 weeks after for lipids, liver enzymes, lactate, mitochondrial DNA content and limb/total fat mass by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scanning.. Forty-eight weeks after the switch, there were significant reductions in lipids and lactate, but no change in liver enzymes. There was reversal of lipoatrophy, as shown by rises in limb fat mass (+0.38 kg, P = 0.006) and total fat mass (+0.69 kg, P = 0.02) on DEXA scan. Patients perceived weight improvement, but did not report reversal of lipoatrophy of individual body parts. The mitochondrial DNA/nuclear DNA ratio rose (+1.06, P < 0.0001).. After the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor switch, reversal of mitochondrial toxicity was consistent with switch studies of mainly Caucasian patients, although the peripheral mononuclear cell mitochondrial DNA rise exceeded previous reports.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Body Fat Distribution; Didanosine; DNA, Mitochondrial; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Lipids; Liver Function Tests; Organophosphonates; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Tenofovir; Thailand

Data are scarce on the long-term efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy for the maintenance of HIV suppression. Four years of results of patients randomized to monotherapy in the Only Kaletra (OK) pilot clinical trial are presented.. Twenty-one HIV-infected patients with suppressed HIV replication (<50 copies/mL) for at least 6 months and without previous failure while receiving a protease inhibitor-based regimen started lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy. Follow-up was performed within the OK pilot clinical trial during the first 2 years and according to routine clinical practice during the 3rd and 4th years.. Fourteen patients (67%) remain on monotherapy and with RNA <50 copies/mL (intention-to-treat analysis, with missing patients scored as failures). Five patients (24%) had virological rebound and all of them were successfully re-suppressed by adding two nucleosides. No major protease inhibitor mutations were found.. Our data support the long-term efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy for the maintenance of HIV suppression, a finding that must be confirmed in larger studies.

Topics: Adult; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Lopinavir; Male; Mutation; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

New strategies such as boosted-protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy are being investigated. However, a concern remains regarding the efficacy of this strategy in viral sanctuaries such as the male genital tract. More than 80% of untreated HIV-infected men have detectable HIV-RNA in semen and such a strategy could favour local selection of resistant variants, given the poor penetration of most PIs in semen.. To evaluate the impact of a first-line lopinavir/ritonavir alone or standard triple combination on HIV-1 shedding in the genital tract.. HIV-1-infected men enrolled in the Monark randomized trial were eligible for the present study after 48 weeks of a first-line lopinavir/ritonavir alone or in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine. Single-paired samples of blood and semen were collected at week 48. Blood plasma HIV-RNA and seminal plasma HIV-RNA were measured at week 48. Lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations were measured in blood and in semen at week 48 by high-performance liquid chromatography.. Ten patients were included: five of them received lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy and five received a triple combination. At week 48, all patients had blood plasma HIV-RNA <1.7 log(10) copies/mL. Median lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations were within the expected therapeutic target range in blood plasma (4896 and 130.5 ng/mL, respectively), whereas both lopinavir and ritonavir were undetectable in all seminal plasma samples (<30 ng/mL). All 10 patients had undetectable seminal plasma HIV-RNA at week 48 (<2.3 log(10) copies/mL).. No local viral production was evident in semen, despite the local absence of therapeutic antiretroviral drug concentrations in the five patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir alone.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genitalia, Male; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Longitudinal Studies; Lopinavir; Male; Plasma; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Semen; Time Factors; Virus Shedding; Zidovudine

Efavirenz and lopinavir/ritonavir are both recommended antiretroviral agents for combination first-line therapy, although information on direct comparisons between them is scarce. A retrospective longitudinal study from the VACH cohort comparing both regimens was performed.. Efficacy was examined comparing time to virological failure, CD4 recovery and clinical progression. Tolerability was examined comparing time to treatment discontinuation for any reason and for toxicity. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and standard and weighted Cox regression models.. A total of 1550 antiretroviral-naive patients starting a two-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor regimen plus either efavirenz (n = 1159) or lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 391) were included in the study. At baseline, patients starting lopinavir/ritonavir had higher HIV-1 RNA and lower CD4+ cell counts. There was no difference in the adjusted hazards of virological failure [efavirenz versus lopinavir/ritonavir hazard ratio (HR) = 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77-1.12, P = 0.43], CD4 recovery (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.95-1.30, P = 0.19) and clinical progression (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.39-1.31, P = 0.27). There was an increased risk of discontinuation for any reason or for toxicity for lopinavir/ritonavir (HR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.40-3.15, P = 0.0003). CD4 recovery with both drugs was also similar in the lowest CD4 strata. A higher risk of early hypertriglyceridaemia was associated with lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimens.. Our study suggests similar virological efficacy for efavirenz- or lopinavir/ritonavir-based first-line antiretroviral regimens, but an increased risk of discontinuation because of toxicity in case of lopinavir/ritonavir-based therapy. Immunological outcome appeared similar with both regimens.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Hypertriglyceridemia; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Longitudinal Studies; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Withholding Treatment

Topics: Brazil; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Mutation; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Time; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Middle Aged; Organophosphonates; Pilot Projects; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

A member of the major human cytochrome P450 superfamily of hemoproteins, CYP3A4/5, converts cholesterol into 4beta-hydroxycholesterol. We studied plasma 4beta-hydroxycholesterol levels prior to and 4 weeks after initiating antiretroviral therapy that included efavirenz, ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir with the aim of exploring the usefulness of plasma 4beta-hydroxycholesterol levels as an endogenous biomarker of CYP3A activity. Efavirenz is an inducer of CYP3A, whereas the ritonavir-boosted regimens are net inhibitors of CYP3A.. In patients treated with efavirenz, the median plasma 4beta-hydroxycholesterol level increased by 46 ng/mL (p = 0.004; n = 11). In contrast, patients given ritonavir-boosted atazanavir showed a median decrease in plasma 4beta-hydroxycholesterol of -9.4 ng/mL (p = 0.0003; n = 22), and those given ritonavir-boosted lopinavir showed a median change from baseline of -5.8 ng/mL (p = 0.38; n = 19). There were significant between-group differences in the effects of antiretroviral treatment on plasma 4beta-hydroxycholesterol levels (p < 0.0001).. Changes in plasma 4beta-hydroxycholesterol following the initiation of efavirenz- or atazanavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy reflected the respective net increase and decrease of CYP3A activity of these regimens. The plasma 4beta-hydroxycholesterol level did not indicate a net CYP3A inhibition in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm, possibly because of concomitant enzyme induction.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Induction; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxycholesterols; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Young Adult

To investigate the interaction between ketoconazole and darunavir (alone and in combination with low-dose ritonavir), in HIV-healthy volunteers.. Volunteers received darunavir 400 mg bid and darunavir 400 mg bid plus ketoconazole 200 mg bid, in two sessions (Panel 1), or darunavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg bid, ketoconazole 200 mg bid and darunavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg bid plus ketoconazole 200 mg bid, over three sessions (Panel 2). Treatments were administered with food for 6 days. Steady-state pharmacokinetics following the morning dose on day 7 were compared between treatments. Short-term safety and tolerability were assessed.. Based on least square means ratios (90% confidence intervals), during darunavir and ketoconazole co-administration, darunavir area under the curve (AUC(12h)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and minimum plasma concentration (C(min)) increased by 155% (80, 261), 78% (28, 147) and 179% (58, 393), respectively, compared with treatment with darunavir alone. Darunavir AUC(12h), C(max) and C(min) increased by 42% (23, 65), 21% (4, 40) and 73% (39, 114), respectively, during darunavir/ritonavir and ketoconazole co-administration, relative to darunavir/ritonavir treatment. Ketoconazole pharmacokinetics was unchanged by co-administration with darunavir alone. Ketoconazole AUC(12h), C(max) and C(min) increased by 212% (165, 268), 111% (81, 144) and 868% (544, 1355), respectively, during co-administration with darunavir/ritonavir compared with ketoconazole alone.. The increase in darunavir exposure by ketoconazole was lower than that observed previously with ritonavir. A maximum ketoconazole dose of 200 mg day(-1) is recommended if used concomitantly with darunavir/ritonavir, with no dose adjustments for darunavir/ritonavir.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antifungal Agents; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Darunavir; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Ketoconazole; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

DG17 is an orally available prodrug of DG35 (a novel HIV protease inhibitor with variable pharmacokinetics). These studies aimed to optimize DG17 pharmacokinetics by gastric acid neutralization and ritonavir pharmacoenhancement. Both studies were conducted using a randomized, cross-over design in which 6 healthy individuals were administered a single dose of 100mg or 200mg DG17, half with the study intervention (sodium bicarbonate solution in the first study, low dose ritonavir in the second). After a one week washout period, each subject was then administered a second dose of DG17, with the study intervention only administered to the other half. Cmax and AUC increases with gastric acid neutralization were greatest in those with the lowest absorption of DG17 alone. All doses were subsequently given with sodium bicarbonate solution in the second study. Low-dose ritonavir co-administration with DG17 increased DG35 C(max) (median 1437 versus 100 ng/ml, p=0.028) and AUC (median 6975 versus 154ng/ml*hr, p=0.028) compared with DG17 without ritonavir. Plasma DG35 exceeded the IC(90) for HIV for > or = 12 hours following a single DG17/ritonavir dose. No significant adverse events occurred. Single dose DG17 is safe and best administered in a manner preventing gastric acid degradation and with low-dose ritonavir.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastric Acid; Half-Life; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prodrugs; Ritonavir; Sodium Bicarbonate

The use of either efavirenz or lopinavir-ritonavir plus two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is recommended for initial therapy for patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, but which of the two regimens has greater efficacy is not known. The alternative regimen of lopinavir-ritonavir plus efavirenz may prevent toxic effects associated with NRTIs.. In an open-label study, we compared three regimens for initial therapy: efavirenz plus two NRTIs (efavirenz group), lopinavir-ritonavir plus two NRTIs (lopinavir-ritonavir group), and lopinavir-ritonavir plus efavirenz (NRTI-sparing group). We randomly assigned 757 patients with a median CD4 count of 191 cells per cubic millimeter and a median HIV-1 RNA level of 4.8 log10 copies per milliliter to the three groups.. At a median follow-up of 112 weeks, the time to virologic failure was longer in the efavirenz group than in the lopinavir-ritonavir group (P=0.006) but was not significantly different in the NRTI-sparing group from the time in either of the other two groups. At week 96, the proportion of patients with fewer than 50 copies of plasma HIV-1 RNA per milliliter was 89% in the efavirenz group, 77% in the lopinavir-ritonavir group, and 83% in the NRTI-sparing group (P=0.003 for the comparison between the efavirenz group and the lopinavir-ritonavir group). The groups did not differ significantly in the time to discontinuation because of toxic effects. At virologic failure, antiretroviral resistance mutations were more frequent in the NRTI-sparing group than in the other two groups.. Virologic failure was less likely in the efavirenz group than in the lopinavir-ritonavir group. The virologic efficacy of the NRTI-sparing regimen was similar to that of the efavirenz regimen but was more likely to be associated with drug resistance. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00050895 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Failure

The sequence variability in the protease and in the 5 Gag cleavage sites (CS) were explored to look for eventual associations between the mutations. Moreover, we have evaluated associations between the Gag region sequence and the virological response to Protease Inhibitors (PI).. The protease and the 5 Gag CS sequences from 98 PI-experienced patients were sequenced and compared to the HXB2 reference sequence. Sixty patients, treated by Saquinavir plus Ritonavir, were studied to evaluate the clinical impact of the Gag region variability.. The relationship between 63 protease mutations and 21 Gag CS mutations were explored. Two patterns of mutations in the protease were identified: (M46I/L, I54V, V82A/T/F) was associated to the A431V and (K20I/R/M, L89M/I) to the S373Q and L449P. None of the Gag CS mutations resulting from PI treatment was associated to the virological response to SQV/r. On the other hand, the S373P mutation had a negative impact on the virological response that remained statistically significant in a multivariate analysis after adjustment on the number of PI resistance mutations.. These results evoke the pertinence to introduce some mutations found in the Gag CS in the algorithms used for the interpretation of resistance testing.

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Anti-HIV Agents; Binding Sites; Drug Resistance, Viral; Gene Products, gag; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Molecular Sequence Data; Mutation; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome

Once-daily (QD) fosamprenavir (FPV) at 1,400 mg boosted with low-dose ritonavir (RTV) at 200 mg is effective when it is used in combination regimens for the initial treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Whether a lower RTV boosting dose (i.e., 100 mg QD) could ensure sufficient amprenavir (APV) concentrations with improved safety/tolerability is unknown. This randomized, two 14-day-period, crossover pharmacokinetic study compared the steady-state plasma APV concentrations, safety, and tolerability of FPV at 1,400 mg QD boosted with either 100 mg or 200 mg of RTV QD in 36 healthy volunteers. Geometric least-square (GLS) mean ratios and the associated 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for plasma APV maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing period (AUC0-tau), and trough concentrations (Ctau) during each dosing period. Equivalence between regimens (90% CIs of GLS mean ratios, 0.80 to 1.25) was observed for the plasma APV AUC0-tau (GLS mean ratio, 0.90 [90% CI, 0.84 to 0.96]) and Cmax (0.97 [90% CI, 0.91 to 1.04]). The APV Ctau was 38% lower with RTV at 100 mg QD than with RTV at 200 mg QD (GLS mean ratio, 0.62 [90% CI, 0.55 to 0.69]) but remained sixfold higher than the protein-corrected 50% inhibitory concentration for wild-type virus, with the lowest APV Ctau observed during the 100-mg QD period being nearly threefold higher. The GLS mean APV Ctau was 2.5 times higher than the historical Ctau for unboosted FPV at 1,400 mg twice daily. Fewer clinical adverse drug events and smaller increases in triglyceride levels were observed with the RTV 100-mg QD regimen. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of FPV at 1,400 mg QD boosted by RTV at 100 mg QD are now under way with antiretroviral therapy-naïve patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Carbamates; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Prodrugs; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

To investigate the feasibility of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir monotherapy in HIV-1-infected patients with stable antiretroviral therapy (ART).. Single-armed single-center pilot trial.. Adult HIV-1-infected patients, without protease inhibitor (PI) experience, were eligible if they had maintained a viral load <20 copies/mL for a minimum of 12 months on conventional ART. The trial regimen was atazanavir/ritonavir at a dose of 300/100 mg once daily. The atazanavir dose could be adjusted if plasma concentrations showed a low exposure. The study was intended to recruit 30 patients to be followed over 72 weeks. If 5 cases of virologic failure occurred during this period, the study was to be terminated.. The study was terminated according to protocol when 15 of the planned 30 patients had been recruited, because 5 cases of virologic failure had occurred. In patients failing therapy, viral rebound was seen at weeks 12 through 16. Plasma atazanavir concentrations were not associated with the outcome. The median serum bilirubin concentration was significantly lower in the patients failing therapy, however. No PI resistance was found in samples from patients failing therapy.. Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir as maintenance monotherapy in HIV-1 infection might not be as potent as conventional ART. Serum bilirubin should be further studied as a biomarker of adequate atazanavir exposure.

Topics: Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; Bilirubin; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pilot Projects; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

We evaluated 19 children using 220-300 mg/m of indinavir (IDV) boosted with 100 mg ritonavir (RTV) (n = 12) or full-dose RTV (n = 7). Geometric mean (GM) (90% confidence interval, CI) of IDV Ctrough in children who took IDV with 100 mg RTV (n = 12) was 0.17 (0.06-0.50) mg/L. For children who took IDV with full-dosage RTV, GM (90% CI) was 0.40 (0.10-1.61) mg/L. C2hours were less than 10 mg/L in all subjects. Eighteen children had good virologic response. This report demonstrates that smaller IDV dosages given with RTV provide efficacious plasma concentrations and can be safely used.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Child; Drug Synergism; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Ritonavir; Thailand

We report the results of the extended follow-up at one year of a randomized trial evaluating the virological efficacy of a salvage therapy combining lopinavir and amprenavir with either 200 or 400 mg/day ritonavir, along with optimized nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, in patients carrying multidrug-resistant isolates. The combination of amprenavir, lopinavir and ritonavir (400 mg/day) is durably potent, yielding a sustained virological response (HIV RNA < 50 copies) in 39% of cases.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Carbamates; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Follow-Up Studies; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides

Complex antiretroviral regimens can be associated with increased toxicity and poor adherence. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of switching to two simplified, class-sparing antiretroviral regimens.. We conducted a randomized, open-label study in 236 patients with virologic suppression who were taking a three- or four-drug protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor regimen for > or = 18 months. Patients received lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 533 mg/133 mg twice daily + efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg once daily or EFV + two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). Primary study endpoint was time to first virologic failure (VF, confirmed HIV-1 RNA > 200 copies/ml) or discontinuation because of study drug-related toxicity.. After 2.1 years of follow up, patients receiving LPV/r + EFV discontinued treatment at a greater rate than patients receiving EFV + NRTI (P < 0.001). Twenty-one patients developed VF (14 receiving LPV/r + EFV and seven receiving EFV + NRTI) and 26 discontinued because of a study drug-related toxicity (20 receiving LPV/r + EFV and six receiving EFV + NRTI). Time to VF or study drug related-toxicity discontinuation was significantly shorter for LPV/r + EFV than EFV + NRTIs (P = 0.0015). A significantly higher risk of drug-related toxicity occurred with LPV/r + EFV, mainly for increased triglycerides (P = 0021). A trend toward a higher VF rate occurred with LPV/r + EFV in an intent-to-treat and as-treated analyses (P = 0.088 and P = 0.063 respectively).. Switching to EFV + NRTI resulted in better outcomes, fewer drug-related toxicity discontinuations and a trend to fewer virologic failures compared to switching to LPV/r + EFV.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Brecanavir (BCV) is a novel, potent protease inhibitor in development for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infection with low nM in vitro 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) against many multiprotease inhibitor resistant viruses. This study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled repeat-dose escalation to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of BCV, with or without ritonavir (RTV), in 68 healthy subjects. Seven sequential cohorts (n=10) received BCV (50 to 600 mg) in combination with 100 mg RTV (every 12 h [q12h] or q24h) or alone at 800 mg q12h for 15 days. BCV alone or in combination with RTV was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. The most common drug-related adverse event was headache. BCV was readily absorbed with median time to maximum concentration of drug in serum values ranging from 2.5 to 5.0 h postdose following single- and repeat-dose administration of BCV alone and BCV with RTV 100 mg. Geometric mean BCV accumulation ratios ranged from 1.4 to 1.56 following BCV-RTV q24h regimens and from 1.84 to 4.93 following BCV q12h regimens. BCV steady state was generally achieved by day 13 in all groups. All day 15 BCV-RTV trough concentration values in q12h regimens reached or surpassed the estimated protein-binding corrected in vitro IC50 target BCV concentration of 28 ng/ml for highly resistant isolates. The pharmacokinetic and safety profile of BCV-RTV supports continued investigation in HIV-1-infected subjects.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Benzodioxoles; Carbamates; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Safety

The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of three doses of tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r) in highly treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected patients with protease inhibitor (PI)-resistant isolates were evaluated. A 24-week multicenter, double-blind, randomized, dose-finding trial was conducted. All patients were three-drug class experienced and had taken at least two PI-based regimens. All had at least one primary PI mutation and had plasma HIV-RNA > 1000 copies/ml. Patients remained on their background non-PI antiretroviral medications for the first 14 days. After this 14-day period of functional TPV/r monotherapy, the background antiretroviral medications were optimized based on treatment history and the screening genotype. A total of 216 patients were randomized. All groups [TPV/r 500 mg/100 mg (n = 73), 500 mg/200 mg (n = 72), and 750 mg/200 mg (n = 71) twice daily] achieved an approximate 1 log10 reduction in the median HIV-RNA at week 2. A significant reduction was sustained through 24 weeks in the TPV/r 500 mg/200 mg and 750 mg/200 mg groups. The 500 mg/200 mg dose achieved optimal median TPV trough concentrations and lower interpatient variability. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and headache. The TPV/r 750 mg/200 mg group had the highest rate of grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities and study discontinuations due to AEs. All doses of TPV/r tested in this study were associated with HIV-1 viral load reductions through 24 weeks. The 500 mg/200 mg dose achieved the best efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic profile in this highly treatment-experienced population and was selected for the pivotal phase 3 studies.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

The ongoing phase IIb POWER 1 (TMC114-C213) trial is designed to assess efficacy and safety of the protease inhibitor (PI) TMC114 (darunavir) in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients.. This randomized, partially blinded, 24-week dose-finding study compared efficacy and safety of four doses of TMC114 plus low-dose ritonavir (TMC114/r) with investigator-selected control PI(s) (CPI[s]).. Patients with one or more primary PI mutation and HIV RNA > 1000 copies/ml received optimized background therapy, plus TMC114/r 400/100 mg once daily, 800/100 mg once daily, 400/100 mg twice daily or 600/100 mg twice daily, or CPI(s). The primary endpoint (intent-to-treat) compared proportions of patients achieving viral load reduction >or= 1.0 log10 copies/ml from baseline.. In total, 318 patients were treated. Baseline mean viral load was 4.48 log10 copies/ml; median CD4 cell count was 179 cells/microl. In the CPI arm 62% of patients discontinued (virological failure: 54%); 10% of TMC114/r patients discontinued. More TMC114/r (69-77%) than CPI patients (25%) reached the primary endpoint (P < 0.001); 43-53% of TMC114/r patients and 18% of the CPI arm achieved viral load < 50 copies/ml (P < 0.001). TMC114/r demonstrated greater mean CD4 cell count increases versus CPI(s) (68-124 versus 20 cells/microl; P < 0.05). TMC114/r 600/100 mg twice daily demonstrated the highest virological and immunological responses. Adverse event incidence was similar between treatments; headache and diarrhoea were more common with CPI(s).. TMC114/r demonstrated statistically higher 24-week virological response rates and CD4 cell count increases than CPI(s). TMC114/r 600/100 mg twice daily has received regulatory approval in treatment-experienced patients.

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Darunavir; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

To describe outcomes in patients starting first-line antiretroviral regimens including lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in a routine clinic setting.. Previously naïve patients starting LPV/r-containing antiretroviral therapy were included in the study. Virological failure was defined as the first of two viral loads >500 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL more than 6 months after starting LPV/r. Cumulative percentages experiencing virological failure were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods.. A total of 195 individuals had a median follow-up time of 1.7 years. At 48 weeks, 87.9, 77.4 and 71.6% of patients with pretreatment CD4 counts of <50, 50-200 and >200 cells/microL, respectively, remained on LPV/r. By 48, 72 and 96 weeks, 2.2, 3.0 and 5.0% of patients, respectively, had experienced virological failure, ignoring treatment changes but censoring follow-up at discontinuation of all antiretrovirals; these percentages became 24.0, 33.7 and 42.3% when LPV/r discontinuation was considered as virological failure. Censoring those who stopped LPV/r with a viral load <50 copies/mL and considering as virological failures those who stopped LPV/r with a viral load >50 copies/mL gave 12.1, 14.6 and 17.0% virological failure at 48, 72 and 96 weeks, respectively. Median CD4 count increases at 24, 48 and 72 weeks were 167, 230 and 253 cells/microL, respectively.. Few patients experienced virological failure whilst on a LPV/r-based regimen, although it was not uncommon for patients in our clinic with higher baseline CD4 counts to discontinue LPV/r.

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; London; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

To assess the safety, efficacy and metabolic toxicity of lopinavir/ritonavir + saquinavir or zidovudine/lamivudine and evaluate the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir + saquinavir.. HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral-naive subjects were randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg) twice daily + saquinavir (800 mg) or zidovudine/lamivudine (150/300 mg) in a Phase II, 48 week study. Subjects receiving lopinavir/ritonavir + zidovudine/lamivudine initiated escalating doses of saquinavir (400, 600 and 800 mg) weekly for 3 weeks.. By intent-to-treat (non-completer = failure) analysis, 10/16 (63%) lopinavir/ritonavir + saquinavir-treated and 7/14 (50%) lopinavir/ritonavir + zidovudine/lamivudine-treated subjects achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (P=0.713) at week 48. Safety, tolerability, metabolic changes and truncal fat increases were similar between groups. Small decreases in the lower extremity fat in the zidovudine/lamivudine group (-6%) and a statistically significant increase in the lower extremity fat in the saquinavir group (+19%) were observed. Lopinavir/ritonavir co-administered with saquinavir 600 or 800 mg twice daily produced saquinavir concentrations similar to those previously reported for saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice daily.. Treatment regimens had similar efficacy and tolerability. Metabolic parameters suggested lipoatrophy in the zidovudine/lamivudine treatment group. Saquinavir 600 and 800 mg twice daily produced concentrations similar to those previously reported for saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice daily.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Zidovudine

We evaluated the plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of once-daily low-dose boosted saquinavir (SQVr; 1,200 of saquinavir [SQV] with 100 mg of ritonavir) plus two nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive or limited protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. A prospective study without entry restrictions on the plasma HIV-RNA (VL) or CD4 cell count was carried out. Plasma and intracellular SQV levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Efficacy was evaluated by an intention-to-treat analysis; treatment failure was defined as virological failure (a VL of >50 copies/ml after 24 weeks or a confirmed rebound to >50 copies/ml) or interruption for any reason. A total of 151 patients were included in the study (106 of them either had never received PI or had no previous virological failure on PIs) and could be characterized as follows: previous C3 stage, 28.9%; injection-drug users, 69.1%; subjects with chronic viral hepatitis, 53%; and subjects with cirrhosis, 10%. The median baseline CD4 level was 184/mul, and the median VL was 4.8 log(10) copies/ml. Median C(max), area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h, and C(min) plasma and intracellular SQV levels were 3,672 and 10,105 ng/ml, 34,283 and 99,535 ng.h/ml, and 359 and 1,062 ng/ml, respectively. The efficacy as determined by intention to treat at 52 weeks was 69.7% (96% in the on-treatment analysis), with similar results regardless of the baseline VL and CD4 counts. Only five patients had virological failure despite adequate C(min) levels, but with a poor adherence (the only variable related to virological failure). Adverse events caused the withdrawal of the treatment in four patients (2.6%). In conclusion, given the pharmacokinetic profile, efficacy, and tolerability of this regimen, once-daily low-dose SQVr may be considered a treatment option in treatment-naive or limited PI-experienced HIV-infected patients, with the additional benefit of being currently the least-expensive PI-based regimen available.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome

Agents for the treatment of HIV-1-infected patients with resistance to current antiretroviral (ART) drugs are needed.. TMC114-C202 was a randomized, partially blinded, dose-finding study in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients with one or more primary protease inhibitor (PI) mutations and HIV-1 RNA > 1000 copies/ml. Patients were randomized to receive one of four TMC114 doses given with ritonavir (TMC114/r) or investigator-selected control PI drug(s) (CPI); all received an optimized background regimen. The primary intent-to-treat analysis compared the proportion of patients achieving a >or= 1 log10 copies/ml HIV-1 RNA reduction at week 24 between the treatment arms using the time-to-loss of virological response algorithm.. For 278 patients at baseline, mean HIV-1 RNA was 4.7 log10 copies/ml, median CD4 cell count was 106 cells/mul; HIV-1 isolates had a median of three primary PI mutations and a median fold change in lopinavir susceptibility of 80. Discontinuation rates were 23% for TMC114/r versus 64% for CPI. More patients in each TMC114/r dose group achieved >or= 1.0 log10 copies/ml reduction in HIV-1 RNA than in the CPI group (45-62% versus 14%; P

Topics: CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome

The continuing, randomised, multinational, phase IIB POWER 1 and 2 studies aim to evaluate efficacy and safety of darunavir in combination with low-dose ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients. We did a pooled subgroup analysis to update results at week 48 for patients receiving the recommended dose of darunavir-ritonavir compared with those receiving other protease inhibitors (PIs).. After 24-week dose-finding phases and primary efficacy analyses, patients randomised to receive darunavir-ritonavir were given 600/100 mg twice daily, and patients receiving control PIs continued on assigned treatment into the longer-term, open-label phase; all patients continued on optimised background regimen. We assessed patients who had reached week 48 or discontinued earlier at the time of analysis; for the darunavir-ritonavir group, only patients who received 600/100 mg twice daily from baseline were included. Analyses were intention-to-treat. The POWER 2 study (TMC114-C202) is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00071097).. At week 48, 67 of 110 (61%) darunavir-ritonavir patients compared with 18 of 120 (15%) of control PI patients had viral load reductions of 1 log10 copies per mL or greater from baseline (primary endpoint; difference in response rates 46%, 95% CI 35%-57%, p<0.0001). Based on a logistic regression model including stratification factors (baseline number of primary PI mutations, use of enfuvirtide, baseline viral load) and study as covariates, the difference in response was 50% (odds ratio 11.72, 95% CI 5.75-23.89). In the darunavir-ritonavir group, rates of adverse events were mostly lower than or similar to those in the control group when corrected for treatment exposure. No unexpected safety concerns were identified.. Efficacy responses with darunavir-ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily plus optimised background regimen were greater than those with control PI and were sustained to at least week 48, with favourable safety and tolerability in treatment-experienced patients. This regimen could expand the treatment options available for such patients.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

The addition of a low dose of ritonavir to protease inhibitors (PIs) has become a widespread strategy to improve PI pharmacokinetics. As resistance is a major barrier to long-term suppression, in salvage therapy genotype and/or phenotype scoring is currently used to predict the response. We evaluated the relationship between the saquinavir (SQV) inhibitory quotient (IQ) (virtual and genotypic) and virological response.. Eligible patients were on a PI-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen excluding SQV and had a viral load >5000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL. The PI was switched to SQV/ritonavir (RTV) 1000/100 mg twice a day (bid) and the same two backbone nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) were maintained at least until week 4, when the resistance test results became available. Genotype and virtual phenotype were determined at baseline, while the SQV trough plasma concentration was determined at week 4.. Fifty-three patients were included in the study. Mean baseline viral load and CD4 count were 137,693 copies/mL and 263 cells/microL, respectively, the mean number of previous PIs was 2.3 and the mean number of protease gene mutations (PGMs) was 4.1. Using an on-treatment analysis, at week 16 the mean increase in CD4 count was 70.9 cells/microL, viral load was <200 copies/mL in 17 out of 37 patients (45.9%), and 30 out of 45 patients (66.7%) were considered virological responders (VRs) (viral load <200 copies/mL or viral load declined > or =1 log(10) at week 16). Median virtual phenotype was 1.3 (0.6-6.9). Baseline differences were detected between VR and non-VR populations: the mean numbers of PGMs were 3.2 and 5.8 (P<0.05), the mean numbers of SQV-associated mutations were 2 and 3.8 (P<0.05), and the mean CD4 counts were 365.9 and 184.3 cells/microL (P<0.05), respectively. Mean SQV trough concentrations at week 4 were 1.1 and 1.0 microg/mL (not significant), and mean virtual IQs were 0.7 and 0.1 (P<0.01), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that baseline PGMs >5 or SQV-associated mutations>5, virtual phenotype, baseline viral load >50,000 copies/mL, and virtual IQ <0.5, but not genotypic IQ, were the variables independently associated with non-VR.. In heavily pretreated patients, the use of SQV virtual IQ or alternatively virtual phenotype, as well as PGMs, is a useful tool for the prediction of virological response.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol; Drug Synergism; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Saquinavir; Triglycerides; Viral Load

The aim of the study was to predict reductions in progression to AIDS/death associated with the treatment benefit of antiretrovirals on CD4 counts and HIV RNA in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).. The study design was a pooled analysis of two trials (POWER 1 and POWER 2) of optimized background treatment plus either TMC114/ritonavir (TMC114/r) or control protease inhibitor (CPI).. Across the two randomized trials (mean baseline CD4 count 114 cells/microL and HIV RNA 4.6 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/mL), CD4 counts rose by a mean of 98 cells/microL for TMC114/r 600/100 mg twice a day (bid) vs. 17 cells/microL for CPI at week 24; HIV RNA fell by a median of 1.90 and 0.49 log(10) copies/mL in the two groups, respectively. For the CD4 categorization method, cohort data on rates of progression to AIDS/death during HAART within preset CD4 ranges were used to predict rates of progression during TMC114/r and CPI treatment. For the regression method, data from clinical endpoint trials were used to correlate historical treatment effects on HIV RNA and CD4 with clinical benefits.. The CD4 categorization method predicted a 48% reduction in clinical progression to AIDS/death for TMC114/r vs. CPI. The regression method predicted a 55% reduction [95% confidence interval (CI) 45-66%] in the hazard of progression to AIDS/death based on CD4 counts, with a 47% reduction (95% CI 38-53%) predicted from effects on HIV RNA.. Independent methods generated similar predictions of a 47-55% reduction in progression to AIDS/death for TMC114/r vs. CPI treatment, based on the changes in CD4 counts and HIV RNA from the POWER 1 and POWER 2 trials. These methods could be used to estimate clinical benefits of other antiretrovirals.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cohort Studies; Darunavir; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Disease Progression; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Predictive Value of Tests; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

To compare the relative antiviral efficacy of TMC114 with low-dose ritonavir (TMC114/r) and tipranavir with low-dose ritonavir (TPV/r) vs. control protease inhibitor (CPI) in treatment-experienced patients, using data from the POWER 1/2 and RESIST 1/2 trials. These trials recruited antiretroviral-experienced patients with HIV RNA > 1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and at least one primary PI mutation, and used optimized nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with or without enfuvirtide, plus investigator-selected CPI in the control arms.. For the POWER trials, data from the 600/100 mg twice a day (bid) dose and CPI arms (n=201) were included, while all data from the RESIST trials (TPV/r 500/200 mg bid and CPI; n=1159) were included. The difference in week 24 efficacy (intent to treat) for the new PI vs. CPI was compared between the trials.. Overall baseline characteristics were well matched across the trials. At week 24, 72% of TMC114/r patients achieved a > or =1 log(10) copies/mL reduction in HIV RNA compared with 40% of TPV/r patients (for CPI patients, this percentage was 21 and 18%, respectively, in the POWER and RESIST trials). The treatment benefit of TMC114/r over CPI in the POWER trials was greater (outside the 95% confidence intervals) than the benefit of TPV/r over CPI in the RESIST trials, for the 24-week HIV RNA endpoints of 1 log(10) copies/mL reduction, <400 copies/mL and <50 copies/mL, and also for the mean rise in CD4 count. In sensitivity analysis, this difference in efficacy was strongest for those who did not also use enfuvirtide.. Given the caveats of this type of analysis (for example, possible differences in trial conduct, and undetected differences in baseline resistance profiles), the efficacy benefits of TMC114/r vs. CPI in the POWER trials appear to be greater than the benefits of TPV/r vs. CPI in the RESIST trials, for patients who did not also use enfuvirtide.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

Toxicities observed with current combination antiretroviral therapy (CART) warrant a search for novel options, such as class-sparing regimens. Ritonavir-boosted double-protease inhibitor (PI)-only regimens are such an option but are prone to pharmacokinetic interactions.. This 48-week randomized study examined the safety and efficacy of a switch in CART to a once-daily regimen of saquinavir (SQV), ritonavir (RTV), and atazanavir (ATV) that did not include nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The study also assessed the pharmacokinetic profile of a change in the SQV formulation, from 200 mg to 500 mg, in 2 regimens (SQV-RTV twice per day plus NRTIs [arm 1] and SQV-RTV-ATV once per day without NRTIs [arm 2]) in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects (plasma human immunodeficiency virus RNA level, <50 copies/mL). Patients underwent an initial SQV formulation change or a CART change to SQV-RTV-ATV with intense pharmacokinetic sampling. All patients were subsequently assigned to receive SQV-RTV-ATV (1500, 100, and 300 mg once per day, respectively) without NRTIs for 48 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who experienced virologic failure.. Of 25 subjects enrolled, scleral icterus was the most common adverse event (3 patients [12.5%]). Three subjects (12.5%) experienced virologic failure; and mean (+/- standard error of the mean) increase in the CD4(+) lymphocyte count was 63 +/- 36 cells/ mu L over 48 weeks (P=.012). The SQV geometric mean area under the time curve parameters were not significantly altered for the 2 SQV formulations (arm 1, 23.32 vs. 18.76 ngxh/mL [geometric mean ratio, 0.80] for the 200-mg vs. 500-mg formulations, respectively; arm 2, 50.31 vs. 44.79 ngxh/mL [geometric mean ratio, 0.88], for the 200-mg vs. 500-mg formulations, respectively).. A CART regimen of SQV-RTV-ATV alone demonstrated sustained virologic efficacy and was associated with significant increases in the CD4(+) lymphocyte count.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome

Brecanavir, a novel protease inhibitor (PI), has sub-nM in vitro antiviral activity against multi-PI-resistant HIV-1 and in vitro is >100-fold more potent than previously marketed PIs and approx. 10-fold more potent than the recently marketed PI, darunavir.. HPR10006 is an open label, single-arm, descriptive 48 week study, with 8 and 24 week interim analyses. Thirty-one HIV-1-infected patients were enrolled and received brecanavir/ritonavir 300 mg/100 mg twice daily, with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, based on history and genotype.. At baseline, 25/31 had PI-sensitive virus and 6/31 had PI-resistant virus (median of two primary PI and five secondary PI mutations). Median baseline HIV-1 RNA was 5.0 and 4.2 log(10) copies/mL, respectively. Four patients discontinued prior to Week 24. At Week 24, 77% (24/31) had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL regardless of screening genotype, including 5/6 patients with PI-resistant virus (6/6 had HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL). Brecanavir/ritonavir was well tolerated with no serious adverse events or clinically concerning changes in laboratory parameters. Of 31 patients, 10 (32%) experienced drug-related Grade 2-4 adverse events [most frequent events were fatigue (13%), dyspepsia (10%) and nausea (10%)]. Baseline isolate brecanavir IC(50) values for all patients ranged from 0.1 to 0.2 nM. Median plasma trough concentration at Week 4 was 150 ng/mL. Correcting the IC(50) (0.2 nM) value for protein binding (6-fold increase in vitro with 50% human serum) gives a corrected inhibitory quotient of 180.. Brecanavir/ritonavir was well tolerated and showed potent antiviral activity in HIV-1-infected patients harbouring both PI-sensitive and PI-resistant virus, following 24 weeks of dosing.

Topics: Adult; Amino Acid Substitution; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzodioxoles; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome

To determine the evolution of renal function in highly treatment-experienced patients with normal renal function at baseline receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) as part of a fixed combined antiretroviral regimen and to identify prognostic factors of change in renal function, including tenofovir concentrations.. A prospective 48-week open-label trial was carried out, evaluating the safety of TDF, associated with atazanavir/ritonavir, and optimized nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, in patients with documented failure in previous treatments. Statistical analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis.. Fifty-three patients were included, with a median CD4+ T-cell count of 206 x 10(6)/l and a median HIV RNA level of 5 log10 copies/ml. All patients had normal serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearances (CL(Cr)) at baseline, which were stable within the 2 months preceding inclusion. Two patients discontinued TDF as a result of severe renal impairment. Two patients never started TDF. A total of 49 patients without clinical nephrotoxicity were analysed. The median creatinine level increased significantly from baseline to week 48 (+0.04 mg/dl [+5.8%]; P = 0.008), and the median CL(Cr) decreased significantly (-7.8 ml/min [-7.6%]; P = 0.005). Trough tenofovir concentration was not associated with change in CL(Cr), (P = 0.79). No risk factors, including tenofovir plasma trough levels, were significantly associated with change in CL(Cr) at week 24.. This study confirms that TDF-related severe nephrotoxicity is an uncommon event. In patients without clinical nephrotoxicity, the use of TDF during a 1-year period was associated with a slight but significant alteration of renal function, which was not associated with increased trough concentration.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Creatinine; Female; France; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

Subcutaneous limb fat loss continues to be one the most troubling side effects of long-term antiretroviral regimens. Nucleoside analogues and protease inhibitors (PIs) have been linked to the development of this complication.. We evaluated the effects of nucleoside-sparing and PI-sparing regimens on fat distribution, bone mineral density, and metabolic parameters in 62 subjects, who were not selected for lipoatrophy, with advanced HIV (nadir CD4 count or=80,000 copies/mL) and an undetectable HIV viral load. Participants were randomized to switch their initial successful antiretroviral regimen to open-label lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) at a dose of 533/133 mg twice a day and efavirenz (EFV) at a dose of 600 mg/d (the nucleoside-sparing arm) versus EFV and 2 nucleoside analogues (the PI-sparing arm).. At week 48, the median change in limb fat in the nucleoside-sparing arm was 562 g (6%, interquartile range [IQR]: -218-1186 g) versus a loss of -242 g (-4%, IQR: -539-452 g) in the nucleoside-containing PI-sparing arm (P = 0.086). At the time of last observation (median = 102 weeks, IQR: 73-152 weeks), a median gain of 782 g (10%, IQR: -380-1168 g) of limb fat was noted in the nonnucleoside arm (n = 22) versus a loss of 850 g (-15%, IQR: -1270 to -526 g) in the nucleoside-containing arm (n = 25; P = 0.002).. The switch to a nucleoside-sparing combination antiretroviral regimen (LPV/r + EFV) was associated with significant improvement in limb fat. These results provide additional evidence that nucleoside analogues are important in the progressive limb fat loss that characterizes antiretroviral treatment and that switching medications can significantly improve this complication. This option has to be carefully balanced with the potential to increase serum lipid levels and the trend to increase virologic failure.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Body Fat Distribution; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Time Factors

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in infancy features a persistently high viral load and elevated antiretroviral drug clearance rates, which pose significant therapeutic challenges to the clinician. Viral and cellular kinetic analyses performed in HIV-infected adults have yielded significant insights into the dynamic setting of this viral infection. Similar studies are needed in pediatric populations, in whom differing dynamics might translate into age-specific treatment approaches.. Viral and cellular kinetic analyses were performed using a nonlinear mixed-effects model in a cohort of 48 infants 1-24 months of age enrolled in a trial of ritonavir-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).. Infected cell compartment kinetics were comparable with reported adult values, with no age-specific differences demonstrated--suggesting the ability to suppress viral replication in infants receiving HAART. Comparisons between 2 ritonavir dosing schedules revealed significant improvement in phase 1/2 decay constants in favor of the higher dose. A negative correlation was established between plasma RNA levels and phase 1 decay rates, which has worrisome implications for infant therapeutics given high infant pretreatment plasma virus levels.. Ritonavir-based HAART regimens in infancy result in HIV decay constants comparable to those reported in adults, without age-specific variability. Despite higher plasma HIV levels and CD4 lymphocyte counts in infancy, HAART can result in timely, effective control of viral replication.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load; Virus Replication

BI 1182.2, an open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study, evaluated efficacy and tolerability of the protease inhibitor (PI) tipranavir (TPV; 500 mg twice daily or 1000 mg twice daily) administered with ritonavir (100 mg twice daily) in combination with 1 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and 1 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in multiple PI-experienced HIV-1-infected patients.. Forty-one patients were evaluated in 2 arms: low-dose (19 patients) or high-dose (22 patients) ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r). Primary endpoints were change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA concentrations at weeks 16, 24, 48, and 80 and percentage of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels lower than the limit of quantitation. Safety was evaluated by adverse events (AEs), grade 3/4 abnormalities, and serious AEs.. Of all patients, 59% were still receiving TPV/r (14 in low-dose arm and 10 in high-dose arm) at week 80. Patients in both arms had a median >2.0-log10 reduction in plasma viral load. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated that a similar proportion of patients in the high-dose and low-dose groups achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL at week 80 (43% vs. 32%; P = 0.527). The most frequently observed AEs were diarrhea, headache, and nausea.. TPV/r combined with other active antiretroviral agents can provide a durable treatment response for highly treatment-experienced patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

We here present the study results of 21 HIV-1 infected children who were treated with indinavir plus low-dose ritonavir and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for 48 weeks. Although this q12h HAART regimen had potent antiretroviral activity, it was frequently associated with side effects and discontinuation of therapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Infant; Male; Ritonavir

Vicriviroc, an investigational CCR5 inhibitor, demonstrated short-term antiretroviral activity in a phase 1 study.. The present study was a double-blind, randomized phase 2 study of vicriviroc in treatment-experienced, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects experiencing virologic failure while receiving a ritonavir-containing regimen with an HIV-1 RNA level >or=5000 copies/mL and CCR5-using virus. Vicriviroc at 5, 10, or 15 mg or placebo was added to the failing regimen for 14 days, after which the antiretroviral regimen was optimized. The primary end point was the change in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels at day 14; secondary end points included safety/tolerability and HIV-1 RNA changes at week 24.. One hundred eighteen subjects were randomized with a median HIV-1 RNA level of 36,380 (4.56 log(10)) copies/mL and a median CD4 cell count of 146 cells/mm(3). At 14 days and 24 weeks, mean changes in HIV-1 RNA level (log(10) copies/mL) were greater in the vicriviroc groups (-0.87 and -1.51 [5 mg], -1.15 and -1.86 [10 mg], and -0.92 and -1.68 [15 mg]) than in the placebo group (+0.06 and -0.29) (P<.01). Grade 3/4 adverse events were similar across groups. Malignancies occurred in 6 subjects randomized to vicriviroc and in 2 to placebo.. In HIV-1-infected, treatment-experienced patients, vicriviroc demonstrated potent virologic suppression through 24 weeks. The relationship of vicriviroc to malignancy is uncertain. Further development of vicriviroc in treatment-experienced patients is warranted.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents; CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Pyrimidines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

Several genotypic resistance algorithms have been proposed for quantitation of the degree of phenotypic resistance to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor (PI) lopinavir (LPV), including the original LPV mutation score. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 21 codons in HIV protease known to be associated with PI resistance in a large antiretroviral agent-experienced observational patient cohort, "Autorisation Temporaire d'Utilization" (ATU), to assess whether a more optimal algorithm could be derived by using virologic response data from patients treated with LPV in combination with ritonavir (LPV/r). Five of the 11 mutations constituting the LPV mutation score were not associated with a virologic response, while 4 additional mutations not included in this score demonstrated an association. Therefore, the LPV ATU score, which includes mutations at codons 10, 20, 24, 33, 36, 47, 48, 54, 82, and 84, was constructed and shown in two different types of multivariable analyses of the ATU cohort to be a better predictor of the virologic response than the LPV mutation score. The LPV ATU score was also more strongly associated with a virologic response when it was applied to independent clinical trial populations of PI-experienced patients receiving LPV/r. This study provides the basis for a new genotypic resistance algorithm that is useful for predicting the antiviral activities of LPV/r-based regimens in PI-experienced patients. The refined algorithm may be useful in making clinical treatment decisions and in refining genetic and pharmacologic methods for assessing the activity of LPV/r.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Analysis of Variance; Cohort Studies; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Logistic Models; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Pyrimidinones; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of sex on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir. Interaction between lopinavir/ritonavir and tenofovir was also evaluated. Steady-state plasma samples were obtained from virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients on lopinavir/ritonavir 800/200-mg soft gel capsule taken once daily. Drug assays were performed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters estimated by noncompartmental method were reported as 90% confidence intervals (CIs) about the geometric mean ratio (GMR). There were 9 males and 11 females. No sex differences were observed in lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics profile. The GMR(sex) (women compared with men) for lopinavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(24)), maximum concentration (C(max)), and minimum concentration (C(min)) was 0.95 (90% CI, 0.70-1.29), 0.88 (90% CI, 0.67-1.15), and 1.27 (90% CI, 0.60-2.66), respectively. Similarly, the GMR(sex) for ritonavir AUC(24), C(max), and C(min) was 0.84 (90% CI, 0.57-1.24), 0.79 (90% CI, 0.50-1.22), and 1.02 (90% CI, 0.58-1.80), respectively. Tenofovir coadministration led to a reduction in lopinavir/ritonavir plasma exposure, giving a lopinavir GMR(tenofovir) for C(max) of 0.72 (90% CI, 0.57-0.93) and AUC(24) of 0.74 (90% CI, 0.56-0.98), respectively. No difference in lopinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations between sexes was demonstrated in this study. However, tenofovir coadministration lowered lopinavir/ritonavir plasma exposure.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Area Under Curve; Capsules; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Organophosphonates; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sex Factors; Tenofovir

The protease inhibitor darunavir has been shown to be efficacious in highly treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection, but needs to be assessed in patients with a broader range of treatment experience. We did a randomised, controlled, phase III trial (TITAN) to compare 48-week efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir with that of lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-experienced, lopinavir-naive patients.. Patients received optimised background regimen plus non-blinded treatment with darunavir-ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily or lopinavir-ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority (95% CI lower limit for the difference in treatment response -12% or greater) for HIV RNA of less than 400 copies per mL in plasma at week 48 (per-protocol analysis). TITAN (TMC114-C214) is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00110877.. Of 595 patients randomised and treated, 187 (31%) were protease inhibitor naive; 476 of 582 (82%) were susceptible to four or more protease inhibitors. At week 48, significantly more darunavir-ritonavir than lopinavir-ritonavir patients had HIV RNA of less than 400 copies per mL (77% [220 of 286] vs 68% [199 of 293]; estimated difference 9%, 95% CI 2-16). Fewer virological failures treated with darunavir-ritonavir than with lopinavir-ritonavir developed primary protease inhibitor mutations (21% [n=6] vs 36% [n=20]) and nucleoside analogue-associated mutations (14% [n=4] vs 27% [n=15]). Safety data were generally similar between the groups; grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 80 (27%) darunavir-ritonavir and 89 (30%) lopinavir-ritonavir patients.. In lopinavir-naive, treatment-experienced patients, darunavir-ritonavir was non-inferior to lopinavir-ritonavir treatment in terms of our virological endpoint, and should therefore be considered as a treatment option for this population.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Darunavir; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

In POWER 1 and POWER 2, darunavir (TMC114) with low-dose ritonavir (darunavir/r) demonstrated greater efficacy versus control protease inhibitors (PIs). To examine the efficacy and safety of the selected darunavir/r dose further, additional patients were analyzed.. Treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients received darunavir/r at a dose of 600/100 mg twice daily plus an optimized background regimen. The primary intent-to-treat analysis was the proportion of patients with an HIV-1 RNA reduction >or=1 log10 at week 24.. Three hundred twenty-seven patients were treated; the baseline mean HIV-1 RNA was 4.6 log10 copies/mL, and the median CD4 count was 115 cells/mm3 (median primary PI mutations = 3, PI resistance-associated mutations = 9). Two hundred forty-six patients reached week 24 by the cutoff date and were included in the efficacy analysis: 65% and 40% achieved HIV-1 RNA reductions of >or=1 log10 and <50 copies/mL, respectively, at week 24. The mean CD4 count increase was 80 cells/mm3. The most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (14%), nasopharyngitis (11%), and nausea (10%). Nine (3%) patients discontinued treatment because of AEs or HIV-1-related events. Six treatment-unrelated deaths (2%) were reported.. These results corroborate POWER 1 and POWER 2. In this larger set of treatment-experienced patients, darunavir/r at a dose of 600/100 mg twice daily provided substantial virologic and immunologic responses and was generally safe and well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Darunavir; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Statistics as Topic; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Viral Load

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Mali; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adenine; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Didanosine; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Pyrones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

To improve the pharmacokinetics of protease inhibitors, boosting with low-dose ritonavir is performed. However, toxicity, storage conditions and high costs of antiretroviral treatment may necessitate interruption of ritonavir. Ketoconazole was investigated as a potential booster of once-daily (o.d.) saquinavir.. In a single-group, two-period design, 25 virologically and immunologically stable patients on saquinavir/ritonavir 2000/100 mg o.d. were switched to saquinavir/ketoconazole 2000/400 mg o.d. for 2 weeks. Two steady-state pharmacokinetic curves were recorded at both periods.. Fourteen females and 11 male patients were included. Median age was 34 years [interquartile range (IQR), 32-42 years], body weight 54 kg (IQR, 47-59 kg) and body mass index 21 kg/m (19-23 kg/m). The mean saquinavir area under the curve (AUC) during boosting with ritonavir was 57.93 +/- 27.96 mg/h/l, maximum observed concentration (Cmax) was 7.50 +/- 3.45 mg/l and concentration at 24 h (Cmin) was 0.35 +/- 0.30 mg/l. When ketoconazole was used, the saquinavir AUC, Cmax, and Cmin were 12.00 +/- 6.97 mg/h/l, 2.43 +/- 1.35 mg/l and 0.03 +/- 0.04 mg/l, respectively.. Boosting with ketoconazole resulted in 80% lower exposure to saquinavir. Although saquinavir AUC might still be adequate for treatment, concentrations at 24 h reached levels below the recommended trough concentrations of 0.1 mg/l, which may result in selection of resistant HIV-1 viral strains. Therefore, boosting of saquinavir by ketoconazole is not recommended.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Ketoconazole; Male; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Our objective was to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir when coadministered with tenofovir in HIV-1-infected adult patients.. Forty adult HIV-1-infected patients received either atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once daily and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with (n = 20) or without (n = 20) tenofovir-disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir-DF) 300 mg once daily. Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetics were assessed after at least 2 weeks of therapy according to a standardised therapeutic drug monitoring protocol.. Atazanavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and the geometric means of minimum and maximum concentrations (C(min), C(max)), the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC), half-life (t(1/2)) and total clearance (CL(tot)) were subject to a matched pairs-analysis. Patients' pairs were matched for gender, ethnicity, weight and Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) status.. The respective geometric means (90% CI) for atazanavir C(min), C(max) and AUC with tenfovir vs. without tenofovir were 405 (314-523) vs. 417 (304-572) ng/ml, 3,022 (2,493-3,664) vs. 2,817 (2,341-3,390) ng/ml and 34,822 (29,315-41,363) vs. 32,101 (26,206-39,321) ng x h/ml showing no significant differences between the groups. Atazanavir plasma concentrations measured at week 5 of therapy or later were lower than in the first 4 weeks (T-test for C(max), p = .080; AUC, p = .050 and CL(tot), p = .051).. The coadministration of tenofovir-DF did not impair the plasma concentrations of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in a pharmacokinetic analysis of patient pairs matched for gender, ethnicity, weight and CDC status.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Area Under Curve; Atazanavir Sulfate; Chromatography, Liquid; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Female; Half-Life; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Matched-Pair Analysis; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Tenofovir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Treatment with indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/RTV) is very effective but hampered by frequent development of IDV-associated adverse events (mainly nephrotoxicity and skin changes). We tested whether dose reduction of IDV guided by therapeutic drug monitoring resulted in improved tolerability without compromising antiviral efficacy.. HIV-infected patients with any IDV/RTV regimen who suffer from IDV-related adverse events were included. Viral load had to be adequately controlled for at least 2 months prior to inclusion. Dose reduction from 800 mg to 600 or 400 mg IDV b.i.d. followed a specified protocol. IDV-related toxicity and IDV plasma concentrations were monitored for 24 weeks. IDV concentrations were quantified with a validated high performance liquid chromatography method.. Twenty patients were included. Reasons for inclusion were: skin abnormalities 11, nephrotoxicity five, metabolic disturbances three, and hypertension one. IDV dose could be lowered to 400 mg b.i.d. in 13, to 600 mg b.i.d. in two patients. Five patients discontinued the treatment. Overall tolerability improved with respect to incidence and severity of adverse events. Median trough concentrations decreased from 1.02 mg/l (range 0.08-7.1) at baseline to 0.48 mg/l (0.11-1.4) after 24 weeks (p = 0.03) and remained above the critical threshold of 0.1 mg/l at any time after dose reduction. There was no change of CD4 cell counts or viral suppression. There were no significant changes in other laboratory parameters (creatinine, bilirubin, triglycerides, cholesterol, blood count, and urinalysis).. Dose reduction of IDV improved tolerability of IDV-containing highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART). Sufficient IDV trough concentrations were maintained in all patients as was virologic control.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Female; Germany; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Hypertension; Indinavir; Kidney Diseases; Male; Metabolic Diseases; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Severity of Illness Index; Skin Diseases; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Significant interactions between abacavir and other antiretrovirals have not been reported. This study investigated the steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of abacavir when co-administered with atazanavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected individuals.. HIV-infected subjects on abacavir (600 mg once daily) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (excluding tenofovir) underwent a 24 h pharmacokinetic assessment for plasma abacavir concentrations. Atazanavir/ritonavir (300/100 mg once daily; arm (1) or lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg twice daily; arm (2) were then added and the 24 h pharmacokinetic assessment repeated. Arm 3 included subjects stable on atazanavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir and two NRTIs (excluding tenofovir or abacavir). These patients underwent a pharmacokinetic assessment for atazanavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir concentrations on day 1, abacavir (600 mg once daily) was then added to the regimen and the pharmacokinetic assessment repeated. Within-subject changes in drug exposure were evaluated by geometric mean (GM) ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI).. Twenty-four patients completed the study. GM (95% CI) abacavir area under the curve (AUC) was 18,621 (15,900-21,807) and 15,136 (13,339-17,174) ng.h/ml without and with atazanavir/ritonavir and 15,136 (12,298-18,628) and 10,471 (9,270-11,828) ng.h/ml without and with lopinavir/ritonavir. GM (95% CI) atazanavir AUC without and with abacavir was 26,915 (13,252-54,666) and 28,840 (19,213-43,291) ng.h/ml; lopinavir AUC without and with abacavir was 60,253 (48,084-75,509) and 63,096 (48,128-82,718) ng.h/ml.. No changes in atazanavir or lopinavir exposures were observed following the addition of abacavir; however, decreases in abacavir plasma exposure of 17% and 32% were observed following the addition of atazanavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir, respectively.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Atazanavir Sulfate; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir

: Limited information exists on the prognostic value of genotypic interpretation systems (GISs) for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI/rs). We compared PI/r resistance levels ascribed by four GIS and examined their abilities to predict HIV-RNA reductions after starting a PI/r-based regimen (baseline).. : Data on viraemic (HIV-RNA > 500 copies/ml) patients starting a PI/r with a baseline resistance test were combined from an observational cohort study (EuroSIDA) and three randomized trials (MaxCmin1; MaxCmin2 and COLATE). The GIS surveyed were ANRS, DMC, REGA and Stanford. Factors associated with HIV-RNA change were identified through censored regression analysis.. : We included 744 patients, of whom 67% were PI experienced. At baseline 12-28% (depending on the GIS) patients had a virus with predicted resistance/intermediate resistance to the PI/r initiated. Concordance between GISs on ascribed PI/r resistance levels was moderate: kappa values ranged from 0.01 to 1.00, with the lowest kappas seen for amprenavir. The median (interquartile range) baseline HIV-RNA was 4.4 (3.5-5.1) log10 and was reduced by 2.2 (2.1-2.3) log10 12 (9-13) weeks after baseline. GIS consistently showed greater HIV-RNA reductions as the ascribed level of sensitivity to the PI/r increased. Conversely, the number of other active drugs in the rest of the regimen, according to each GIS did not predict HIV-RNA reductions consistently.. : Despite large variations in how GIS classify HIV susceptibility to PI/r, all GIS predicted HIV-RNA reductions of a similar magnitude. The ascribed level of susceptibility to other drugs in the regimen did not predict HIV-RNA decline.

Topics: Adult; Cohort Studies; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Protease Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

Our objective was to identify possible differences in protease inhibitor plasma concentrations between and within three protease inhibitor regimens (indinavir, saquinavir and lopinavir all in combination with low-dose ritonavir) and to relate these differences to safety and efficacy. Data originated from pre-defined pharmacokinetic substudies within two randomized 48-week trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of three protease inhibitor regimens. At weeks 4 and 48, plasma was collected and minimum drug plasma concentrations, C(min), were obtained. Out of 656 randomized patients, 283 patients had available C(min) at week 4. Indinavir, saquinavir and lopinavir C(min) were high when combined with low-dose ritonavir. No significant difference in the proportion of patients experiencing treatment failure could be found according to the C(min) within any treatment arm. A saquinavir C(min) > 2000 ng/ml was associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal grade 3 or 4 adverse events and higher total cholesterol. Overall, there were no changes in C(min) from week 4 to week 48 in patients who remained on therapy. No association between treatment failure and the C(min) could be demonstrated. Associations between high C(min) and toxicity were identified in the saquinavir arm; therefore, dose reductions may be appropriate in certain patients with C(min) several times above the minimum effective concentration.

Topics: Adult; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Treatment Failure

To characterise the interactions between tacrolimus and antiretroviral drug combinations in hepatitis C virus-HIV co-infected patients who had received a liver transplant.. An observational, open-label, multiple-dose, two-period, one-sequence design clinical trial in which patients received tacrolimus as an immunosuppressive therapy during the postoperative period and then had an antiretroviral drug regimen added. Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics were evaluated at steady state during these two periods.. Fourteen patients participated in the study and seven participated in the intensified pharmacokinetic protocol. Patients were included if they had undergone liver transplantation for end-stage chronic hepatitis C, absence of opportunistic infection, a CD4 cell count of >150 cells/microL and an undetectable HIV plasma viral load (<50 copies/mL) under highly active antiretroviral therapy. During the posttransplantation period, the tacrolimus dose was adjusted according to blood concentrations. When liver function and the tacrolimus dose were stable, antiretroviral therapy was reintroduced.. When lopinavir/ritonavir were added to the tacrolimus regimen (seven patients), the tacrolimus dose was reduced by 99% to maintain the tacrolimus concentration within the therapeutic range. Only two patients were treated with nelfinavir, which led to a wide variation in inhibition of tacrolimus metabolism. When efavirenz (four patients) or a nucleoside analogue combination (one patient) was added, very little change in tacrolimus dosing was required.. The lopinavir/ritonavir combination markedly inhibited tacrolimus metabolism, whereas the effect of efavirenz was small. Tacrolimus dosing must be optimised according to therapeutic drug monitoring and the antiretroviral drug combination.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Area Under Curve; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Graft Rejection; Half-Life; Hepatitis C; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver Transplantation; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nelfinavir; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Tacrolimus; Viral Load

Amprenavir (APV), fosamprenavir (FPV), lopinavir (LPV), ritonavir (RTV) and efavirenz (EFV) are to varying degrees substrates, inducers and inhibitors of CYP3A4. Coadministration of these drugs might result in complex pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions.. Two prospective, open-label, non-randomized studies evaluated APV and LPV steady-state pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected patients on APV 750 mg twice daily + LPV/RTV 533/133 mg twice daily with EFV (n=7) or without EFV (n=12) + background nucleosides (Study 1) and after switching FPV 1,400 mg twice daily for APV (n=10) (Study 2).. In Study 1 EFV and non-EFV groups did not differ in APV minimum plasma concentration (Cmin; 1.10 versus 1.06 microg/ml, P = 0.89), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; 17.46 versus 24.34 microg x h/ml, P = 0.22) or maximum concentration (Cmax; 2.61 versus 4.33 microg/ml, P = 0.08); for LPV there was no difference in Cmin, (median: 3.66 versus 6.18 microg/ml, P = 0.20), AUC (81.84 versus 93.75 microg x h/ml, P = 0.37) or Cmax (10.36 versus 10.93 microg/ml, P = 0.61). In Study 2, after switching from APV to FPV, APV Cmin increased by 58% (0.83 versus 1.30 microg/ml, P = 0.0001), AUC by 76% (19.41 versus 34.24 micorg x h/ml, P = 0.0001), and Cmax by 75% (3.50 versus 6.14, P = 0.001). Compared with historical controls, LPV and RTV pharmacokinetics were not changed. All treatment regimens were well tolerated. Seven of eight completers (88%) maintained HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/ml 12 weeks after the switch (1 lost to follow up).. EFV did not appear to significantly alter APV and LPV pharmacokinetic parameters in HIV-infected patients taking APV 750 mg twice daily + LPV 533/133 mg twice daily. Switching FPV 1400 mg twice daily for APV 750 mg twice daily resulted in an increase in APV Cmin, AUC, and Cmax without changing LPV or RTV pharmacokinetics or overall tolerability.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Long-term nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based antiretroviral treatment failure in most developing countries has led to broad cross-resistance within NNRTI and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) classes. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability of a double boosted protease inhibitor (PI) regimen in this setting.. A total of 64 HIV-infected patients who had failed NNRTI-based regimens were randomized to receive either lopinavir/saquinavir/ritonavir [LPV/SQV/r; 400/1000/100 mg twice a day (bid)] alone or indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/r; 800/100 mg bid) plus two NRTIs optimized with genotypic drug resistance guidance. Patients who had no available optimized NRTI backbone were allocated to the LPV/SQV/r arm.. At 48 weeks, the percentages of patients with plasma viral load<50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL were 60% (31 of 52 patients) in the LPV/SQV/r arm vs 50% (six of 12) in the IDV/r/2NRTIs arm in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, and 61% (31 of 51) vs 71% (five of seven), respectively, in the as-treated analysis. The median (interquartile range) increases in absolute CD4 cell count from baseline were 177 (91-269) and 100 (52-225) cells/microL in the LPV/SQV/r and IDV/r/2NRTIs groups, respectively (P=0.32). Four of 12 patients (33%) in the IDV/r/2NRTIs group experienced severe nausea and vomiting and four patients (8%) in the LPV/SQV/r group had significant hepatitis.. LPV/SQV/r and high-dose boosted IDV were not well tolerated and led to <65% ITT virological efficacy outcomes. A randomized larger scale study with new formulations and/or more tolerable boosted PIs in NNRTI-based failure is warranted.

Topics: Adult; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Salvage Therapy; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome

Adequate antiretroviral exposure during pregnancy is critical to prevent the vertical transmission of HIV and for maternal health. Pregnancy can alter drug kinetics. We assessed the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir/ritonavir (300/100 mg a day) during pregnancy.. An intensive steady-state 24-h pharmacokinetic profile of atazanavir was performed in the third trimester of pregnancy and postpartum. Maternal and umbilical cord blood samples were obtained at delivery. We measured atazanavir by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.. Seventeen women completed the study. Antepartum, the atazanavir geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) was 28 510 ng.h/l, the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) was 2 591 ng/ml and the 24-h postdose concentration (Ctrough) was 486 ng/ml. The same postpartum parameters were 30 465 ng.h/l, 2 878 ng/ml and 514 ng/ml, respectively. The antepartum to postpartum ratio for AUC0-24 was 0.94 and for Ctrough was 0.96, indicating equivalence, whereas Cmax values were slightly although not significantly lower. The ratio of cord blood/maternal atazanavir concentration in 14 paired samples was 0.13.. Atazanavir exposure during the third trimester of pregnancy is similar to that observed in the non-pregnant period. Over the whole dosing interval, therapeutic drug concentrations well above the wild-type HIV 90% inhibitory concentration are maintained. Atazanavir crosses the placenta, potentially providing further protection for the newborn. As pregnancy does not appear to alter atazanavir exposure, no dose adjustment is required in pregnant women. Results suggest that atazanavir is a reasonable component of HAART during pregnancy.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Female; Fetal Blood; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Male; Maternal-Fetal Exchange; Oligopeptides; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Outcome; Pyridines; Ritonavir

We assessed the safety and efficacy and evaluated the adherence to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) dosed QD or BID in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected subjects through 96 weeks of treatment. A randomized, open-label, multicenter comparative study was conducted. A total of 190 antiretroviral-naive subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA above 1000 copies/ml and any CD4(+) T cell count were enrolled. Subjects were randomized (3:2) to LPV/r 800/200 mg QD (n = 115) or 400/100 mg BID (n = 75). Subjects received TDF 300 mg and FTC 200 mg QD. Adherence to LPV/r through 96 weeks was measured using MEMS((R)) monitors. Median baseline VL and CD4(+) T cell count were 4.8 log(10) copies/ml and 216 cells/mm(3), respectively. Prior to week 96, 37% (QD) and 39% (BID) of subjects discontinued, primarily due either to adverse events (17% QD, 9% BID) or to loss to follow-up or nonadherence (12% QD, 17% BID). The proportion of subjects with VL <50 copies/ml [57% QD, 53% BID; p = 0.582 (ITT NC = F)], change in CD4 count (244 cells/mm(3) QD, 264 cells/mm(3) BID; p = 0.513), and evolution of resistance did not differ between groups through 96 weeks. Diarrhea (17% QD, 5% BID, p = 0.014) was the most common moderate or severe, study drug-related adverse event. Adherence to LPV/r was higher for the QD group than the BID group and declined over time in both groups. Time to loss of virologic response was significantly associated with adherence to LPV/r in both groups. LPV/r QD resulted in virologic response similar to LPV/r BID through 96 weeks in antiretroviral-naive subjects. Adherence was significantly higher in the QD group.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Viral Load

To identify potential causes and clinical implications of transient increases in plasma viral load (hereafter, "blips").. M99-056 and M02-418 were prospective, randomized trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) capsules administered twice per day or once per day to subjects infected with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1). Plasma viral load was measured every 4 weeks (from baseline through week 24, excluding week 12 and week 20 in M02-418), every 8 weeks (from week 24 through week 48), and every 12 weeks (from week 48 through week 96). Blips were defined by 1 plasma viral load measurement of between 50-1000 copies/mL, immediately preceded and immediately followed by a measurement of <50 copies/mL. A medication event monitoring system was used to record the date and time subjects administered a dose of LPV/r.. Of 228 subject enrolled, event monitor data were available for 223 (98%) subjects (92 of whom received twice-daily LPV/r therapy, and 131 of whom received once-daily therapy). Viral load blips (median plasma viral load, 82 copies/mL [range, 51-858 copies/mL]) were identified in 60 (27%) of the subjects (21 in the LPV/r twice-daily group and 39 in the LPV/r once-daily group). Neither the baseline plasma viral load nor the CD4(+) T cell count were associated with blips. During the week prior to a blip, the mean number of days that the subject administered the prescribed number of doses was lower than the number during a matched period for the same subject during which a blip did not occur (5.55 vs. 6.22 days; P = .007). Blips were not associated with virologic failure or the development of drug resistance.. Blips were associated with decreased adherence, but not with virologic failure or development of drug resistance in these studies of LPV/r.. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00043966 .

Topics: Adult; Aged; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Refusal; Viral Load; Viremia

HIV infection is commonly associated with hypoalphalipoproteinemia. It is not clear how much the HIV infection and/or treatment contribute to the changes in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. Blood lipids of HIV-positive males were assessed in a retrospective study. The following groups of patients were studied: (1) untreated for at least 6 months; (2) treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) without protease inhibitor (PI); (3) treatment with a HAART regimen that includes a PI (HAART/PI); (4) treatment with HAART that includes low-dose ritonavir and a PI (HAART/PI/boost). Lipoprotein levels were compared with those of age-matched HIV-negative healthy subjects. Compared with the control group, HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were 22%, 11%, 14%, and 11% lower for currently untreated HIV, HAART, HAART/PI, and HAART/PI/boost groups, respectively. Negative correlations were found among HDL-C level, peak and current viral load, and duration of the disease and the treatment. A positive correlation was found between HDL-C and current and nadir CD4 cell count and CD4 percentage. When patients were divided into subgroups based on duration of antiretroviral therapy, patients treated with HAART and HAART/PI for 3 to 6 years were significantly less likely to have high HDL-C levels compared with the control group and patients treated for 1 to 3 years. A 5-fold decrease in the proportion of subjects with high HDL-C and a 3-fold increase in those with low HDL-C were found in the group treated with HAART/PI/boost. These data suggest that hypoalphalipoproteinemia in patients with HIV is likely to be secondary to HIV infection itself.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lipoproteins, HDL; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Triglycerides

Topics: Child; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy

The effect of hepatic impairment on lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics was investigated. Twenty-four HIV-1-infected subjects received lopinavir 400 mg/ritonavir 100 mg twice daily prior to and during the study: 6 each with mild or moderate hepatic impairment (and hepatitis C virus coinfected) and 12 with normal hepatic function. Mild and moderate hepatic impairment showed similar effects on lopinavir pharmacokinetics. When the 2 hepatic impairment groups were combined, lopinavir Cmax and AUC12 were increased 20% to 30% compared to the controls. Hepatic impairment increased unbound lopinavir AUC12 by 68% and Cmax by 56%. The effect of hepatic impairment on low-dose ritonavir pharmacokinetics was more pronounced in the moderate impairment group (181% and 221% increase in AUC12 and Cmax, respectively) than in the mild impairment group (39% and 61% increase in AUC12 and Cmax, respectively). While lopinavir/ritonavir dose reduction is not recommended in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment, caution should be exercised in this population.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Liver Diseases; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Radioligand Assay; Ritonavir

In BMS Study 045, once-daily (QD) atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV) demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to twice-daily (BID) lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) over 48 weeks in treatment-experienced patients. Results of extended follow-up to 96 weeks are presented.. BMS Study 045 was an open-label, randomized, multi-national trial of HIV-infected patients with virologic failure on two or more prior HAART regimens designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ATV/RTV (300/100 mg) QD and LPV/RTV (400/100 mg) BID, each with tenofovir (300 mg) QD and one nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. The primary efficacy measure was the time-averaged difference (TAD) in reduction in HIV RNA from baseline. Secondary objectives included evaluation of safety and plasma lipid levels through week 96.. Over 96 weeks, the ATV/RTV regimen demonstrated similar virologic efficacy to the LPV/RTV regimen. Mean reductions from baseline in HIV RNA were -2.29 and -2.08 log10 copies/ml, respectively [TAD (97.5% confidence interval): 0.14 log10 copies/ml (-0.13, 0.41)]. The LPV/RTV regimen resulted in significant increases in total cholesterol (+9%) and fasting triglycerides (+30%) in comparison with the ATV/RTV regimen, which demonstrated decreases in these parameters [-7 and -2%, respectively, (P < 0.0001)]. Grade 2-4 diarrhoea occurred less frequently in ATV/RTV patients (3%) in comparison with LPV/RTV patients (13%) (P < 0.01). Grade 3-4 elevations in bilirubin were more common in ATV/RTV patients (53%) than LPV/RTV patients (< 1%) (P < 0.0001), with no resulting discontinuations.. Regimens containing once-daily ATV/RTV demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety, with significant reductions in total cholesterol and fasting triglycerides and improved gastrointestinal-tolerability in comparison with twice-daily regimens containing LPV/RTV over 96 weeks in treatment-experienced patients.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Didanosine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Tenofovir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To assess if enfuvirtide (ENF) increases antiviral activity of a highly active four-drug antiretroviral (ARV) regimen containing lopinavir/ritonavir, efavirenz, lamivudine and tenofovir in ARV-naive, HIV-infected patients.. Pilot study in ARV-naive, HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL) >10,000 copies/ml and no documented resistance to any of the study drugs. Patients were randomized to receive ENF (ENF Group) or not (Control Group) in combination with lopinavir/ritonavir, efavirenz, lamivudine and tenofovir as a backbone. The primary endpoint was to assess differences in the HIV-1 RNA decay rate during the first phase of viral decay. VL and treatment adherence were measured at baseline, every 6 h during the first 3 days, and once daily from day 3 to 6. Individual HIV-1 RNA decay rates were obtained using a non-linear least squares regression model.. Eight subjects were included in each study group. Mean (SD) baseline VL was 4.98 (0.38) log10 copies/ml in the ENF Group and 5.10 (0.49) log10 copies/ml in the Control Group (P=0.607). Baseline CD4+ cell count was 463 (306) and 362 (225) cells/mm3 in the ENF and the Control Group, respectively (P=0.484). First phase HIV-1 RNA decay rate was 0.802 (0.127) d(-1) in the ENF Group and 0.624 (0.182) d(-1) in the Control Group (P=0.045). By day 6, VL was 3.55 (0.40) and 3.92 (0.36) log10 copies/ml in the ENF and the Control Group, respectively (P=0.079).. The addition of ENF increased the antiviral potency of a highly active four-drug ARV regimen by 28.5% in ARV-naive, HIV-infected patients. The clinical impact of this finding should be assessed.

Topics: Adenine; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Organophosphonates; Oxazines; Patient Compliance; Peptide Fragments; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

To assess potential pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between atazanavir (ATV, 300 mg, once daily) and lopinavir (LPV, 400 mg, twice daily), both boosted by ritonavir (RTV, 100 mg).. Two-parallel groups, addition of LPV in patients receiving ATV (n=6), and addition of ATV in patients receiving LPV (n=7), with before/after comparisons.. Each group had two complete PK profiles before and 2 weeks after the addition of the second protease inhibitor (PI). Total plasma concentrations (Ctot) were analysed by HPLC-UV and unbound plasma concentrations (Cu) and cellular concentrations (Ccell) were analysed by LC-MS/MS. Plasma and cellular PK parameters were also calculated. Unbound and cellular fractions were expressed as Cu/Ctot and Ccell/Ctot ratio. Data were analysed by paired Student t-test on log values; correlations between Ccell, Cu and Ctot were explored by log-log linear regression.. Adding LPV to ATV did not influence the plasma and cellular PK parameters of ATV. Adding ATV to LPV was associated with a decrease in LPV concentrations (by 16% for area under the time-concentration curve, maximum concentration and trough concentration, NS; and by 35% for Cmin, P=0.04). The RTV PK parameters remained unmodified. The Ccell/Ctot and Cu/Ctot ratio was unaffected by the addition of the second PI and remained stable throughout dosing interval. Good correlations were observed between Ccell, Cu and Ctot for each drug. No relevant toxicity was observed.. Adding LPV to ATV did not influence the plasma and cellular PK parameters of ATV. Adding ATV to LPV caused a limited decrease in LPV concentrations. The clinical significance of this decrease is unknown and warrants further investigation to determine the need for tailoring LPV dosage in selected cases.

Topics: Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; Blood Proteins; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Protein Binding; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Comparison of efficacy and safety of four highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens (HAART) including two nucleoside analogues (NA) and a protease inhibitor (PI) in HIV positive patients with advanced infection and antiretroviral naive.. Multicenter, randomized and open labeled clinical trial in ten community hospitals of Castilla-La Mancha and Madrid. Regimen 1 contains zidovudine (AZT), lamivudine (3TC) and indinavir (IDV) regimen 2 includes AZT, 3TC and ritonavir (RTV), regimen 3 was didanosine (DDI), estavudine (D4T) and IDV, and regimen 4 included DDI, D4T and RTV. Decrease in viral load of HIV (VC) has been assessed as primary endpoint and as secondary one, the increase of the numbers of CD4 lymphocytes, percentage of disease progression, adverse reactions and adherence. Measurements were made at baseline visit and at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks.. A total of 98 patients with a mean baseline CD4 count of 122 x 10(6)/l (range of 5-340) and a baseline viral load of 5.1 log copies/ml were included. At 48 weeks, a mean increase of the CD4 and decrease of the viral load without significant difference between the 4 regimens (103 cells/2.62 log in regimen 1; 169 cells/2.86 log in regimen 2; 171 cells/2.56 log in regimen 3 and 141 cells/1.71 log in regimen 4) were observed in the analysis of the patients in treatment. Treatment was discontinued due to adverse reactions: 24% in regimen 1, 48% in regimen 2, 26% in regimen 3 and 32% in regimen 4, without significant difference. Analyzing by PI groups, 41% of the patients with RTV and 25% of those with IDV discontinued treatment due to adverse effects. There was withdrawal from treatment due to disease progression in 7% of the RTV patients and in 9% of IDV patients.. In the HIV positive patients with advanced infection, efficacy between the four regimens of HAART is similar, but there is a tendency to require more withdrawal due to adverse effects in the RTV group than in those of IDV, the two used as single PI.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Didanosine; Disease Progression; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Stavudine; Zidovudine

To assess the virologic response rates of atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir based on baseline genotype and phenotype.. Resistance analyses were performed on a Bristol-Myers Squibb-sponsored study comparing the safety and efficacy of atazanavir/ritonavir to lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced subjects at 48 weeks. Analyses evaluated virologic response based on the presence of baseline primary protease inhibitor mutations and baseline susceptibility.. Less than 30% of atazanavir/ritonavir-treated patients were responders if substitutions at positions M46, G73, I84 or L90 were present in their HIV at baseline. In comparison, lopinavir/ritonavir response rates were less than 30% when protease substitutions at M46, I54, or I84 were present at baseline. The response rates were similar between atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir-treated subjects with zero to four baseline protease inhibitor mutations, but response rates were reduced if five or more baseline mutations were present: 0% for atazanavir/ritonavir compared with 28% for lopinavir/ritonavir. Baseline phenotype results showed that response rates were similar between atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir if shifts in susceptibility were zero to five, but response rates were lower if shifts were greater than five; 11% for atazanavir/ritonavir compared with 27% for lopinavir/ritonavir.. Both type and number of baseline protease inhibitor mutations affected virologic response to atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced subjects. In addition, baseline phenotypic susceptibility could differentiate virologic response rates to the two drugs. These resistance analyses provide information on the likelihood of a virologic response to antiretroviral drugs based on baseline genotypic and phenotypic data, which is valuable to physicians and patients when choosing antiretroviral regimens.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Approval; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Oligopeptides; Phenotype; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Lopinavir/ritonavir is approved for treatment of HIV-infected children at a dosage regimen of 230/57.5 mg/m(2) twice daily. However, once daily administration could increase convenience and patient adherence. Our study aimed at evaluating whether inhibitory concentrations are maintained in plasma following administration of lopinavir/ritonavir once daily.. Lopinavir/ritonavir was administered at the standard twice daily regimen to 21 HIV-infected children, as a component of their antiretroviral treatment. Following at least 1 month of administration, seven patients received a dose of 460/115 mg/m(2) once daily for three consecutive days. After the third dose of once daily administration, blood samples were drawn at the following times: 0 (pre-dose), 1, 2 and 4 h following administration. The pre-dose (C(min)) and the peak (C(max)) concentrations were compared with the values obtained following twice daily administration in all the study patients.. Median (interquartile range) C(min) with the once daily regimen was 1.59 (0.77-6.85) mg/L versus 7.90 (5.45-9.77) mg/L with the twice daily regimen (P < 0.05). C(min) was considered inhibitory for wild-type virus (>1.0 mg/L) in four out of seven patients. C(max) did not differ significantly between the once daily and twice daily regimens.. Our small pilot study suggests that lopinavir/ritonavir once daily may be a suitable regimen for antiretroviral-naive children. However, due to the high interindividual variability and low concentrations in some patients, therapeutic drug monitoring may be necessary to ensure that concentrations are adequate to inhibit viral replication. A formal clinical study of lopinavir/ritonavir once daily in treatment-naive children is warranted.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Plasma; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Ritonavir (RTV)-boosted atazanavir (ATV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF-DF) are promising in highly experienced patients because of their pharmacokinetic profile, activity, safety and resistance properties.. A 26-week study of the safety and efficacy of RTV-boosted ATV plus TDF-DF was conducted in 53 HIV-infected patients who were failing their current highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen. Patients with history of failure to at least two protease inhibitors (PIs) and one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) were randomized to either continue their current regimen (group 1) or replace the PI by ATV (300 mg once daily) boosted by RTV (100 mg; group 2) for 2 weeks. Then, all patients received the same combination of ATV, RTV and TDF-DF (300 mg) plus optimized NRTIs regimen.. At baseline, median CD4+ T-cell count was 206/mm3, median viral load (VL) 5.0 log10/ml and median numbers of NRTI, NNRTI and PI resistance mutations were 7, 1 and 8, respectively. At week 2, median VL remained unchanged from baseline in group 2 as compared with group 1 (-0.1 vs -0.1 log10/ml). At week 26, a mild decrease in median VL from baseline of 0.2 log10/ml was observed, with 16 (31%) and 9 (17%) patients exhibiting a decrease in viral load of at least 0.5 and 1.0 log10/ml, respectively. Baseline phenotypic and genotypic resistance to ATV were the most predictive independent factors of virological response. The regimen was well tolerated.. In these very advanced patients failing highly HAART, the combination of boosted ATV plus TDF-DF yielded low antiretroviral activity.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Tenofovir; Treatment Failure

The use of HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) in a ritonavir (RTV)-boosted form is now common. However, randomized data comparing boosted with unboosted PI strategies are scarce.. This randomized, open-label trial compared indinavir (IDV) 800 mg three times daily with IDV/RTV 800/100 mg twice daily, both given with zidovudine (AZT)/lamivudine (3TC) twice daily in individuals with at least 3 months previous AZT experience. The primary endpoint was the time-weighted average change in HIV RNA from baseline. Designed as a 48-week study, follow-up continued until week 112. Primary analysis is by intention to treat.. One hundred and three patients commenced therapy and are included in the analysis. Patients had a median of 29 months past nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) exposure. Baseline median (interquartile range) log10 HIV RNA was 4.0 (3.3-4.5) and CD4+ T-cell count 166 (40-323) cells/microl. After 112-weeks of study there was no significant difference observed between arms in the mean (SD) change in time-weighted average HIV RNA from baseline (-1.6 [1.1] HIV RNA copies/week/ml three times daily arm; -1.4 [1.1] HIV RNA copies/week/ml twice daily arm; P = 0.3). Both arms were associated with substantial toxicity expressed as serious adverse events and study drug interruptions. The twice daily arm experienced greater dyslipidaemia. Mean (SD) changes in time-weighted CD4+ T-cell count from baseline were similar [88 (84) cells/week/microl three times daily arm; 70 [109] cells/week/microl twice daily arm; P = 0.3).. RTV-boosted IDV 800/100 mg twice daily demonstrated comparable efficacy to unboosted IDV 800 mg three times daily dosing. Both regimens were associated with substantial toxicity. Use of lower doses of RTV-boosted IDV may result in better tolerability without loss of efficacy and warrant further research.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Time Factors; Viral Load; Zidovudine

To assess the impact of baseline HIV-1 substitutions, individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (Cmin, Cmax, area under the curve [AUC0-->24 h]) and genotype-inhibitory quotient (GIQ) on virological responses (VR) to atazanavir-ritonavir (300 mg/100 mg)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in 71 antiretroviral-experienced, atazanavir-naive patients in virological failure (VF) on HAART.. VR was defined as HIV RNA <1.7 log10 copies/ml at week 12 (W12). A clinically relevant genotype-substitutions score for atazanavir-ritonavir was developed and validated (Reyaphar substitutions score). Previously published substitutions scores were also tested.. Patients had a median (Q1; O3) of 6 (3; 8) previous treatment lines during 9 (7; 11) years. Baseline (WO) values were as follows: 262 (187; 435) CD4+/microl, 3.9 (2.6; 4.9) log10 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml, 4 (2; 6) protease substitutions and 3 (1; 4) NRTI-related substitutions. Respective steady-state Cmin, Cmax and AUC0-->24 h were 300 (200; 700) ng/ml, 620 (430; 750) ng/ml and 78,000 (61,000; 94,000) ng.h/ml. At W12, 49% of the patients had VR with a median decrease of -1.2 (-0.5; -2.3) log10 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml. The Reyaphar score included 12 baseline protease substitutions from the International AIDS Society USA list that were associated with poorer VR: L10I/F/R/V, K20I/M/R, L241, M461/L, 154L/M/T/V, L63P, A71I/L/V/T, G73A/C/F/T, V771, V82A/F/S/T, 184V, L90M and the polymorphism substitution Q58E. Comparing <5 versus > or =5 Reyaphar substitutions, the W12-W0 HIV-1 RNA decrease was - 1.4 (-0.7; -2.3) versus -0.5 (-1.2; +0.5) log10 copies/ml (P=0.009) with VR in 63% versus 110% (P<10(-4)), respectively. This score predicted VF at W12 with 46% sensitivity, compared to 33% and 28% for the ANRS 2004 and 2005 scores. PK parameters alone were not associated with VR, but GIQ was associated with virological outcome (P=0.04). 150L, known to be correlated with atazanavir-specific resistance, emerged in 2 (8%) of the 24 failing patients with paired genotypes at WO and VF.. These findings highlight the need to cross-validate genotype-based algorithms to interpret substitution impact on virological outcome using different patient databases before their implementation in routine clinical practice.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Amino Acid Substitution; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome

Lopinavir is an HIV protease inhibitor that is co-formulated with ritonavir. The approved paediatric dose is 230/57.5 mg/m2 twice daily. Once-daily dosing may offer an advantage to adherence. We studied the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir in a once-daily regimen in HIV-1-infected children.. HIV-1-infected children on stable antiretroviral therapy with a viral load <50 copies/ml for at least 6 months received lopinavir/ritonavir 460/115mg/m2 once daily with zidovudine and lamivudine. Blood samples were collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 24 h after observed intake during steady state. Target level for lopinavir Cmin was 1.0 mg/l, based on in vitro IC50 data.. Nineteen HIV-1-infected children with a median (range) age of 4.5 (1.4-12.9) years were enrolled. The median (interquartile range) dose of lopinavir was 456 (444-477) mg/m2. The mean (standard deviation) AUC0-24, Cmax and Cmin of lopinavir were 149.8 +/- 58.8 h*mg/l, 10.77 +/- 2.90 mg/l and 2.88 +/- 3.74 mg/l respectively. These values are comparable to data observed in adults using lopinavir/ritonavir 800/200 mg once daily. In 10/19 (53%) children Cmin was considered to be too low (<1.0 mg/l). Younger children more often experienced subtherapeutic trough levels.. Our findings indicate that 460/115 mg/m2 lopinavir/ritonavir once daily leads to mean pharmacokinetic parameters comparable to data of 800/200 mg lopinavir/ritonavir once daily in adults, although the variability observed in the trough levels is much higher in children. Further research, especially in young children, is necessary to determine whether a higher dosage of lopinavir/ritonavir once daily must be given to reach the target level for Cmin.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Zidovudine

In the SOLO study (APV30002), once-daily antiretroviral treatment with the protease inhibitor fosamprenavir (FPV) 1,400 mg boosted by ritonavir (r) 200 mg plus abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) was found to be noninferior to nelfinavir plus ABC/3TC over 48 weeks in treatment-naive patients with HIV -1 infection.. This interim report presents antiviral efficacy and tolerability data from 211 patients who received FPV/r QD for at least 48 weeks in SOLO and continued this treatment in the follow-on study (APV30005) for up to 120 weeks.. APV30005 is an international, multicenter, uncontrolled, open-label, follow-on study conducted to provide continued access to FPV in patients with HIV-1 infection who had participated in previous FPV studies, including SOLO, and to obtain longer-term data on the antiviral response and tolerability of an FPV-containing regimen. Patients who had completed at least 48 weeks of FPV/r therapy in the SOLO study were eligible to enter the follow-on study and continue receiving FPV/r 1,400/200 QD, with study visits every 12 weeks. Their background regimens were chosen at the investigators' discretion and could be changed at any time. Antiviral response end points included plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 and <50 copies/mL, median plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, median and absolute changes from baseline in the CD4 cell count, and the frequency of HIV disease progression. Genotype and phenotype analyses were performed for patients meeting the criterion for virologic failure (defined as plasma HIV -1 RNA >1,000 copies/mL on 2 consecutive occasions on or after week 12). Tolerability was assessed in terms of adverse-event reports evaluated by the primary investigator and changes in laboratory values. Assessments were conducted at 12-week intervals during the follow-on study. Data from the baseline visit (day 1 of SOLO) were compared with data from the follow-on study through March 31, 2004, when all patients had completed at least 120 weeks of therapy with FPV/r QD. Because this was a rollover study, no significance testing was performed and all reported results are descriptive.. The demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients who received FPV/r QD in this follow on study (N = 211) were similar to those of the 322 patients randomized to receive FPV/r QD in the SOLO study. Their median age was 36 years, 72% were male, 49% were white, and 39% were black. The median baseline plasma HIV 1 RNA level was 4.82 log(10) copies/ mL, and the median baseline CD4+ cell count was 168 cells/mm(3). The median duration of exposure to FPV/r QD from SOLO baseline through the cutoff date was 996 days (142 weeks), ranging from 372 to 1,226 days (53-175 weeks). At week 120, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 and <50 copies/mL were achieved and maintained in 75% (159) and 66% (139) of patients, respectively, when missing data and discontinuations were counted as failures. The median CD4+ cell count at week 120 was 451 cells/mm(3), a median change from baseline of 292 cells/mm(3). In 14 patients with no baseline resistance who met the criterion for virologic failure, no viral protease resistance mutations were detected. Extended treatment was generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported drug-related grade 2-4 adverse events were diarrhea (22 [10%]), nausea (17 [8%]), drug hypersensitivity (14 [7%], all cases attributed to ABC, which was a study drug in SOLO), and increased triglycerides (14 [7%]). The nature of adverse events reported after 48 weeks of therapy was comparable to that reported before week 48. Adverse events occurred at a similar or lower frequency between weeks 48 and 120 compared with before week 48. Similarly, laboratory abnormalities seen by week 120 were comparable to those seen by week 48, although they were less frequent.. Extended treatment (120 weeks) with FPV/r QD in these antiretroviral therapy-naive, HIV-1-infected patients was associated with sustained antiviral response and immunologic improvement. Adverse events had generally developed by 48 weeks of therapy and did not occur at a higher frequency through 120 weeks of treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Carbamates; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Time

Lopinavir-ritonavir is a preferred protease inhibitor co-formulation for initial HIV-1 treatment. Fosamprenavir-ritonavir has shown similar efficacy and safety to lopinavir-ritonavir when each is combined with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. We compared the two treatments directly in antiretroviral-naive patients.. This open-label, non-inferiority study included 878 antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients randomised to receive either fosamprenavir-ritonavir 700 mg/100 mg twice daily or lopinavir-ritonavir 400 mg/100 mg twice daily, each with the co-formulation of abacavir-lamivudine 600 mg/300 mg once daily. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL at week 48 and treatment discontinuations because of an adverse event. The intent-to-treat analysis included all patients exposed to at least one dose of randomised study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00085943.. At week 48, non-inferiority of fosamprenavir-ritonavir to lopinavir-ritonavir (95% CI around the treatment difference -4.84 to 7.05) was shown, with 315 of 434 (73%) patients in the fosamprenavir-ritonavir group and 317 of 444 (71%) in the lopinavir-ritonavir group achieving HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL. Treatment discontinuations due to an adverse event were few and occurred with similar frequency in the two treatment groups (fosamprenavir-ritonavir 53, 12%; lopinavir-ritonavir 43, 10%). Diarrhoea, nausea, and abacavir hypersensitivity were the most frequent drug-related grade 2-4 adverse events. Treatment-emergent drug resistance was rare; no patient had virus that developed reduced susceptibility to fosamprenavir-ritonavir or lopinavir-ritonavir.. Fosamprenavir-ritonavir twice daily in treatment-naive patients provides similar antiviral efficacy, safety, tolerability, and emergence of resistance as lopinavir-ritonavir, each in combination with abacavir-lamivudine.

Topics: Carbamates; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Organophosphates; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

The long-term adverse effects, expense, and difficulty of adherence to antiretroviral regimens have led to studies of simpler maintenance therapies. Maintenance therapy with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir alone is a possible option because of low pill burden, once-daily dosing, safety, and unique resistance profile.. To assess whether simplified maintenance therapy with atazanavir-ritonavir alone after virologic suppression increases the risk of virologic failure (2 consecutive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 [HIV-1] RNA measurements of > or =200 copies/mL).. Single-group, open-label, multicenter, 24-week pilot study of 36 HIV-infected adults with virologic suppression for 48 weeks or longer receiving their first protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen. The study was conducted between September 1, 2004, and April 18, 2006, at 12 participating AIDS clinical trial units in the United States.. Participants switched PIs to atazanavir-ritonavir at entry and discontinued nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) after 6 weeks.. Virologic failure within 24 weeks of discontinuing NRTIs. Other measures included HIV-1 drug resistance, plasma atazanavir concentrations, adverse events, CD4 cell counts, plasma lipid levels, and HIV-1 RNA levels in seminal plasma.. Thirty-six participants enrolled and 2 discontinued before simplification to atazanavir-ritonavir alone. Thirty-four patients were included in the analysis of the primary end point after 24 weeks: 1 withdrew voluntarily, and 33 continued the regimen. Virologic success (absence of failure) through 24 weeks of simplified therapy occurred in 91% (31 of 34 patients; lower 90% confidence interval limit = 85%). Three participants experienced virologic failure 12, 14, and 20 weeks after simplification, with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of 4730, 1285, and 28 397 copies/mL, respectively. Resistance testing at failure did not identify PI resistance mutations. Plasma atazanavir concentrations at failure were low or below detection in 2 of 3 participants experiencing failure. There were no treatment discontinuations for adverse events after simplification; no significant changes in CD4 cell counts or plasma lipid levels; and no detectable HIV-1 RNA in seminal plasma from all 8 participants tested.. These preliminary data suggest that simplified maintenance therapy with atazanavir-ritonavir alone may be efficacious for maintaining virologic suppression in carefully selected patients with HIV infection. These findings require confirmation in larger, randomized trials of this strategy.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00084019.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Patient Compliance; Pilot Projects; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Messenger; Viral Load

Once-daily HIV treatment regimens are being used in clinical practice with the objective of improving patient acceptance and adherence.. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of saquinavir-soft-gelatin capsule (SGC)/ritonavir combination (1600 mg/100 mg) vs efavirenz (600 mg) both once daily and combined with 2 nucleoside analogs twice daily.. Twenty-six centers in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico.. A total of 171 antiretroviral naive HIV-infected individuals were enrolled in a 48-week, phase 3, open-label, randomized study.. Proportion of patients with HIV-RNA levels < 50 copies/mL. The pharmacokinetic profile of saquinavir-SGC was analyzed in a subset of randomly selected patients.. In the primary intent-to-treat population at week 48, 51% (38/75) and 71% (55/77) of patients in the saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir and efavirenz groups, respectively, achieved HIV-RNA suppression < 50 copies/mL (P = .5392, 95% 1-sided confidence interval [CI] = -33.5%). In the on-treatment (OT) population, 73% (38/52) and 93% (54/58) of patients in the saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir and efavirenz groups, respectively, had effective viral suppression < 50 copies/mL (P = .5015, 95% 1-sided CI = -33.4%). Mean CD4+ cell counts increased by 239 and 204 cells/microliters (mcL), in the saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir and efavirenz groups, respectively, in the OT analysis (P = .058). Both regimens were reasonably well tolerated, although more gastrointestinal adverse events were reported with saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir. Pharmacokinetic profiles in 6 patients showed an observed median Cmin at 24 hours of 429 ng/mL (range, 68-1750 ng/mL).. Once-daily efavirenz was statistically superior to once-daily saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were commonly associated with treatment failure in the saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir arm of the study.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Capsules; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gelatin; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Fosamprenavir (FPV) with and without ritonavir (RTV) was added to the antiretroviral regimens of human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects receiving nevirapine (NVP) to evaluate this drug interaction. Significant reductions in plasma amprenavir exposure (25 to 35%) were observed following coadministration of 1,400 mg of FPV twice a day (BID) and 200 mg of NVP BID. A regimen of 700 mg of FPV BID plus 100 mg of RTV BID may be coadministered with NVP without dose adjustment.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Drug Interactions; Female; Furans; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Nevirapine; Organophosphates; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

To evaluate the safety and noninferiority and to explore the efficacy of administration of once-daily versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected subjects.. Randomized, open-label, multicenter, comparative study.. One hundred ninety antiretroviral-naive subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA level >1000 copies/mL and any CD4 cell count were randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir at a dose of 800/200 mg administered once daily (n = 115) or lopinavir/ritonavir at a dose of 400/100 mg administered twice daily (n = 75). Subjects also received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) at a dose of 300 mg and emtricitabine (FTC) at a dose of 200 mg administered once daily.. The median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA level and CD4 count were 4.8 log10 copies/mL and 216 cells/mm, respectively. Before week 48, 20% (once daily) and 29% (twice daily) subjects discontinued. Virologic responses of the subjects through 48 weeks were comparable; 70% (once daily) and 64% (twice daily) achieved an HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL by intent-to-treat, noncompleter = failure analysis. No subject demonstrated LPV or TDF resistance, but 3 subjects (2 in the once-daily group, 1 in the twice-daily group) demonstrated FTC resistance. Mean increases in CD4 count were similar. Diarrhea (16% in the once-daily group, 5% in the twice-daily group; P = 0.036) was the most common moderate or severe study drug-related adverse event.. Through 48 weeks, a once-daily regimen of lopinavir/ritonavir + TDF + FTC appears to have similar virologic and immunologic responses in antiretroviral-naive subjects as the same regimen with lopinavir/ritonavir administered twice daily. Both regimens were relatively well tolerated, and no LPV or TDF resistance was observed.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Safety

To evaluate the virological, immunological and clinical responses to the boosted double protease inhibitor (PI) regimen combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and saquinavir ('LOPSAQ') without reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTI) in HIV-positive patients who have few viable RTI treatment options.. Cohort study of 128 heavily pre-treated patients who were experiencing therapy failure on their current regimen due to RTI resistance and/or systemic toxicities. Patients with PI-resistance mutations or RTI toxicity underwent a structured treatment interruption (STI) (n=76) until virus reverted to wild-type or until resolution of toxicity symptoms. Baseline was defined as the time point when lopinavir/ritonavir plus saquinavir therapy was initiated. Virological response was defined as viral load<400 copies/mL at week 48.. A total of 78 (61%) patients experienced a virological response to therapy (ITT). Median viral load at baseline was 5.06 log10 copies/mL; at week 48 median was 2.16 log10 copies. Median CD4 at week 48 was 280 cells/mm3 compared with 172 cells at baseline. At week 48, 78/128 patients were still on therapy. In univariable analyses, significant predictors of virological response included higher CD4 count (P<0.001), lower viral load (P=0.002), less PI-experience (P=0.006) at baseline and fewer PI-resistance mutations (P=0.043) at end of prior failing regimen; in the multivariable analysis only higher CD4 count at baseline (P=0.009) and fewer number of drugs previously taken (P=0.003) could be specified as independent predictors for response.. The combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and saquinavir without RTIs is a potential option as salvage therapy for patients experiencing therapy failure due to RTI resistance or toxicity. This regimen may not be suitable for patients with very low baseline CD4 cell counts, very broad antiretroviral therapy experience or extensive PI-resistance mutations.

Topics: Adult; Aged; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cohort Studies; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Saquinavir; Viral Load

There are few data on the selection of resistance by ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (SQV/r), particularly in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients.. To assess the incidence of virological failure and evolution of resistance in ARV-naive individuals receiving SQV/r in the induction phase of the Staccato trial.. ARV-naive subjects (n = 272) received SQV/r 1,600/100 mg once daily with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for at least 24 weeks. Patients were defined as having virological failure (VF) when there were two consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements > 500 copies/ml after week 12. Viral genotypes (reverse transcriptase [RT] and protease [PRO]) were determined at baseline in all patients and as close as possible to the time of initial failure in patients experiencing VF.. VF was observed in 9/272 patients receiving SQV/r 1,600/100 mg once daily with two NRTIs (3.3%) and occurred 19-48 weeks after treatment initiation. Eight of these patients were evaluable at failure. No major PRO mutations were detected, but 2/8 displayed single new minor PRO substitutions (M36I, L10I) at VF that were known or suspected not to have been present at baseline; both these substitutions exist as natural polymorphisms. A third patient displayed a single new RT mutation (M184I).. SQV/r plus two NRTIs (1,600/100 mg once daily) is an effective initial treatment option for ARV-naive patients, resulting in a low rate of viral rebound (3.3%). Furthermore, no major protease mutations were detected following VF, suggesting that future treatment options are preserved.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Mutation; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Thailand; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

To compare alternative class-sparing antiretroviral regimens in treatment-naive subjects.. Open-label, multicenter, randomized trial of up to 3 consecutive treatment regimens over 96 weeks.. Two hundred ninety-one subjects received abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine and efavirenz (nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTIs]), ritonavir-boosted amprenavir (protease inhibitor [PI]), or stavudine (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NRTI]) by random assignment. The primary end points were the percentages of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/mL and time to treatment failure over 96 weeks.. Ninety percent of subjects completed 96 weeks of follow-up, and 79% remained on study treatment. At week 96, there were no differences between arms in the percentages of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 and <50 copies/mL, mean changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, time to treatment failure, time to first or second virologic failure, or CD4 cell counts. The NNRTI arm had a greater percentages of subjects with RNA levels

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Oxazines; Ritonavir; Stavudine; Treatment Outcome

To conduct a cost-efficacy analysis of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy as a maintenance regimen following induction of virological response with triple therapy including LPV/r. The pharmacoeconomic analysis was performed from the perspective of the Spanish public health system.. A cost-efficacy analysis was performed in a phase IV-II, comparative, randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with LPV/r monotherapy versus continuation of triple therapy in HIV-infected patients with a persistently undetectable viral load for 6 months. For the pharmacoeconomic analysis, efficacy was defined as the proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA concentrations < 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks from the start of the study. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed. Only direct costs were considered. Cost, efficacy and the cost-efficacy ratio were calculated for each treatment option.. The cost-efficacy ratio of LPV/r maintenance monotherapy was 5186 euros per unit of achieved effect (patient with plasma HIV RNA concentrations < 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks), whereas maintenance with triple therapy had a cost-efficacy ratio of 8688 euros per unit of achieved effect.. The option of LPV/r monotherapy as maintenance therapy in HIV-infected patients following induction of virological response with triple therapy including LPV/r might be a more efficient alternative than maintaining triple therapy, as evidenced by a more favorable cost-efficacy ratio.

Topics: Adult; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Optimal antiretroviral exposure during pregnancy is critical for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission and for maternal health. Pregnancy can alter antiretroviral pharmacokinetics. Our objective was to describe lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) pharmacokinetics during pregnancy.. We performed intensive steady-state 12-h pharmacokinetic profiles of lopinavir and ritonavir (three capsules: LPV 400 mg/r 100 mg) at 30-36 weeks gestation and 6-12 weeks postpartum. Maternal and umbilical cord blood samples were obtained at delivery. We measured LPV and ritonavir by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Target LPV area under concentration versus time curve (AUC) was > or = 52 microg h/ml, the estimated 10th percentile LPV AUC in non-pregnant historical controls (mean AUC = 83 microg h/ml).. Seventeen women completed antepartum evaluations; average gestational age was 35 weeks. Geometric mean antepartum LPV AUC was 44.4 microg h/ml [90% confidence interval (CI), 38.7-50.9] and 12-h post-dose concentration (C12h) was 1.6 microg/ml (90% CI, 1.1-2.5). Twelve women completed postpartum evaluations; geometric mean LPV AUC was 65.2 microg h/ml (90% CI, 49.7-85.4) and C12h was 4.6 microg/ml (90% CI, 3.7-5.7). The geometric mean ratio of antepartum/postpartum LPV AUC was 0.72 (90% CI, 0.54-0.96). Fourteen of 17 (82%) pregnant and three of 12 (25%) postpartum women did not meet our target LPV AUC. The ratio of cord blood/maternal LPV concentration in ten paired detectable samples was 0.2 +/- 0.13.. LPV/r exposure during late pregnancy was lower compared to postpartum and compared to non-pregnant historical controls. Small amounts of lopinavir cross the placenta. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and effectiveness of increased LPV/r dosing during the third trimester of pregnancy should be investigated.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Area Under Curve; Case-Control Studies; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Female; Fetal Blood; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Prospective Studies; Puerperal Infection; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

The availability of enfuvirtide enables assessment of whether human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) decay can be enhanced by targeting reverse transcriptase, protease, and fusion. We performed a 12-week study of 22 patients randomized to receive ritonavir-boosted saquinavir and efavirenz with (the 3-target arm) or without (the 2-target arm) enfuvirtide. We observed no difference in the mean+/-SD elimination-rate constant for overall decay (0.142+/-0.040 per day and 0.128 +/- 0.033 per day in the 2- and 3-target arms, respectively; P>.1) or for modeled first-phase decay rate (-0.62+/-0.34 per day and -0.51+/-0.16 per day; P>.1). Antiretroviral therapy that inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase and protease exerts potent antiviral effects that might not be augmented by the addition of an HIV fusion inhibitor.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; Female; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Oxazines; Peptide Fragments; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Viral Load

Improved treatment options are needed for patients infected with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). The nonpeptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir has demonstrated antiviral activity against many protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 isolates. The Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in multi-drug reSistant patients with Tipranavir (RESIST-1) trial is an ongoing, open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) with an investigator-selected ritonavir-boosted comparator protease inhibitor (CPI/r) in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients.. Six hundred twenty antiretroviral-experienced patients were treated at 125 sites in North America and Australia. Before randomization, all patients underwent genotypic resistance testing, which investigators used to select a CPI/r and an optimized background regimen. Patients were randomized to receive TPV/r or CPI/r and were stratified on the basis of preselected protease inhibitor and enfuvirtide use. Treatment response was defined as a confirmed reduction in the HIV-1 load of > or = 1 log10 less than the baseline level without treatment change at week 24.. Mean baseline HIV-1 loads and CD4+ cell counts were 4.74 log10 copies/mL and 164 cells/mm3, respectively. At week 24, a total of 41.5% of patients in the TPV/r arm and 22.3% in the CPI/r arm had a > or = 1-log10 reduction in the HIV-1 load (intent-to-treat population; P<.0001). Mean increases in the CD4+ cell count of 54 and 24 cells/mm3 occurred in the TPV/r and CPI/r groups, respectively. Adverse events were slightly more common in the TPV/r group and included diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Elevations in alanine and aspartate aminotransferase levels and in cholesterol/triglyceride levels were more frequent in the TPV/r group.. TPV/r demonstrated superior antiviral activity, compared with investigator-selected, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors, at week 24 in treatment-experienced patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Tipranavir, a novel protease inhibitor, has demonstrated antiviral activity against protease inhibitor-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates. The Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in multi-drug reSistant patients with Tipranavir (RESIST-2) trial is an ongoing, open-label, phase III trial comparing ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) plus an optimized background regimen with an individually optimized, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients.. Patients at 171 sites in Europe and Latin America who had received > or = 2 previous protease inhibitor regimens, had triple-antiretroviral class experience, had an HIV-1 RNA level > or = 1000 copies/mL, and had genotypically demonstrated primary protease inhibitor resistance were eligible. After genotypic resistance tests were performed, a protease inhibitor and optimized background regimen were selected before randomization. Patients were randomized to receive either TPV/r or comparator protease inhibitor-ritonavir (CPI/r) and were stratified on the basis of preselected protease inhibitor and enfuvirtide use. Treatment response was defined as a confirmed HIV-1 load reduction > or = 1 log10 less than the baseline value without a treatment change at week 24.. A total of 863 patients were randomized and treated. At baseline, the mean HIV-1 load was 4.73 log10 copies/mL, and the mean CD4+ cell count was 218 cells/mm3. The preplanned 24-week efficacy analyses of 539 patients demonstrated treatment response rates of 41% in the TPV/r arm and 14.9% in the CPI/r arm (intent-to-treat analysis; P<.0001). The mean CD4+ cell count increased by 51 cells/mm3 in the TPV/r arm and by 18 cells/mm3 in the CPI/r arm. The most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate diarrhea, nausea, and headache. Grade 3 or greater elevations in serum transaminase, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were more frequent in the TPV/r arm.. TPV/r had superior antiviral activity and increased immunologic benefits, compared with CPI/r, at week 24 among treatment-experienced patients infected with multidrug-resistant HIV-1.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; Cohort Studies; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Kidney; Lopinavir; Male; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Tenofovir

To assess the drug concentrations, efficacy and safety of concomitant use of rifampicin and regimens containing ritonavir/saquinavir (400mg/400mg twice daily) in tuberculosis-HIV treatment-naive patients.. This was an open-label, non-randomised, multiple-dose study. On study day (D)1, tuberculosis treatment (rifampicin 600mg/isoniazid 400mg per day fasting plus pyrazinamide 2 g/day) was introduced in 30 patients. On D31, highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) consisting of two nucleoside analogues plus ritonavir/saquinavir 400mg/400mg twice daily was initiated (n = 20). The pharmacokinetics were assayed with a validated reversed-phase HPLC method before the introduction of HAART on D30 (for rifampicin), after 30 days of HAART at D60 (for rifampicin plus ritonavir/saquinavir), and at the end of the study (without rifampicin) on D210 (for ritonavir/saquinavir). Clinical evaluations were performed on a monthly basis. CD4 counts and viral load were collected on D30, D60 and D180. Genotyping test for HIV was collected at baseline and at D180. Primary endpoints were drug concentration and viral load at D180 (<80 copies/mL). Secondary endpoints were presence of grade 3 and serious adverse events, clinical improvement, CD4 count and genotypic resistance to ritonavir/saquinavir.. Ten patients dropped out of the study during tuberculosis therapy alone. Mean (+/- SD) baseline CD4 count (on D30) was 151.89 (+/- 146.77) cells/mm(3) and viral load was 5.34 (+/- 0.4) log. During the antiretroviral therapy, 15 patients dropped out, 14 because of adverse events. One patient (of five) presented a viral load of <80 copies/mL at D180. All but one patient increased CD4 counts from baseline. No genotypic resistance was detected. Clinical improvement was evident in all five patients who tolerated the therapy. Serum concentrations of ritonavir/saquinavir and rifampicin remained within the therapeutic range.. Therapeutic concentrations of the studied drugs and reduction of viral load were achieved; adverse events are the main limitation of use of a ritonavir/saquinavir regimen in treatment-naive patients, but its clinical benefits were evident.

Topics: Adult; AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Area Under Curve; Bisexuality; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Half-Life; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Homosexuality; Humans; Karnofsky Performance Status; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Rifampin; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis; Viral Load

In patients with extensive HIV resistance, one option is to delay salvage therapy until new drugs become available. We hypothesized that this delay period could be based on a simplified treatment, which would reduce drug toxicity, stabilize resistance, and prevent resurgence of wild-type virus.. A prospective 24-week treatment simplification study in HIV-1-infected patients having failed several lines of antiretroviral therapy, with CD4+ T-cell counts > or = 100 cells/ml, plasma HIV RNA (viral load [VL]) > or = 4 log10 copies/ml and a resistance genotype predicting less than two active drugs. Treatment associated ritonavir-boosted low-dose indinavir (200 mg twice daily) and lamivudine (150 mg twice daily). The primary endpoint was a decrease in CD4+ T-cell counts > or = 25% or increase in VL > or = 0.7 log copies/ml relative to baseline.. Twenty-six patients were included. Baseline median VL was 4.5 log10 copies/ml and median CD4+ T-cell count was 290 cells/ml. During the study, 10/26 patients (38%, 95% confidence interval = 20.2-59.4) reached the primary endpoint. No patient had an AIDS-defining event. At week 24, the median change in plasma VL was +0.2 log10 copies/ml (interquartile range (IQR): 0-0.5; P = 0.003). The median change in CD4+ T-cell counts was -49 cells/ml (IQR: -14 to -93, P < 0.001), with a median decline slope of 10 cells/ml/month, which was not different from that measured under full highly active antiretroviral therapy during the 6 months preceding inclusion. There were no significant changes in HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase genotypes during the study.. In patients with advanced resistance, treatment simplification prevented resurgence of wild-type HIV, reduced drug burden, but failed to stabilize progression of the immune deficiency.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Endpoint Determination; Female; France; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Ritonavir; Species Specificity; Viral Load

To compare the efficacy and safety of a nucleoside-sparing approach with a conventional highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in antiretroviral-experienced patients with prolonged viral suppression.. Pilot study including 31 antiretroviral-experienced patients with HIV RNA <80 copies/mL. Subjects were randomly assigned to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/rtv) 400/100 mg BID plus nevirapine (NVP) 200 mg BID (NVP group, n = 16) or LPV/rtv plus the 2 previous NRTIs (NRTI group, n = 15). The primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects who maintained viral suppression at week 48. Changes in lipid metabolism, mitochondrial parameters, and LPV trough levels were also assessed.. All patients maintained viral suppression after 48 weeks. No subject discontinued therapy because of adverse events. HDL cholesterol increased by 28% at week 24 (P < 0.0001) and 10% after 48 weeks of follow-up (P = 0.319) in the NVP group. In the NRTI group, LDL cholesterol increased by 14% at week 48 (P = 0.076). Mitochondrial DNA/nuclear DNA ratio and mitochondrial respiratory chain complex IV activity showed a trend toward increasing in the NVP group. Mean (SD) LPV trough levels were 6340 (2129) ng/mL in the NRTI group and 5161 (2703) ng/mL in the NVP group (P = 0.140).. In antiretroviral-experienced subjects with sustained viral suppression, dual therapy with NVP plus LPV/rtv at standard dosage was as potent and safe as standard-of-care HAART at 48 weeks of follow-up. This approach may reduce mitochondrial toxicity and improve LPV/rtv-associated lipid abnormalities. The results of this pilot study support the study of this approach in a larger, randomized trial.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Drug Tolerance; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy Syndrome; Humans; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Mitochondria; Nevirapine; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Safety

Tolerability of the combination of zidovudine-lamivudine and lopinavir-ritonavir as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for human immunodeficiency virus infection was prospectively assessed. A total of 121 patients were enrolled in the study; 23 patients discontinued PEP prematurely for reasons other than adverse events. Of the other 98 patients, 58 (59%) experienced adverse effects, which led to premature PEP discontinuation in 20 cases (20%).

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Viral Load; Zidovudine

HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) may improve hematopoietic functions owing to their direct effects on bone marrow (BM) progenitor cells. In this study we investigated this hypothesis evaluating the effect of adding ritonavir (RTV) and indinavir (IND) on hematopoietic colony formation assays by colony-forming cell (CFC) and long-term culture-initiating cell (LTC-IC) assays, on apoptosis, on cytokine production and stromal cells, in subjects with HIV-1 infection, and in seronegative controls. After PI addition, CFC and LTC-IC assays in HIV-1-infected patients showed levels of colony growth significantly higher than those observed at baseline; the same PI activity on colony formation was observed in healthy subjects. No significant modifications on Fas, the membrane form of Fas (mFas) and Fas-ligand (FasL) expression, and on cytokine production were observed at BM level after the addition of PIs. At baseline, in HIV-1-infected patients, the majority of the stromal cells appeared as large and rounded, whereas after the addition of RTV or IND the stromal cells exhibited a "fibroblast-like" morphology and produced higher stem cell factor (SCF) and lower MIP-1alpha levels when compared with the stromal production without the addition of IND. RTV and IND increased colony growth of BM obtained either from HIV-1-infected patients or from normal individuals, in parallel with the normalization of functional and morphological characteristics of stromal cells.

Topics: Adult; Apoptosis; Bone Marrow Cells; Cells, Cultured; Cytokines; Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cells; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV Seronegativity; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Stromal Cells

To evaluate fosamprenavir/lopinavir (LPV)/ritonavir (RTV), fosamprenavir/RTV, or LPV/RTV in antiretroviral treatment-experienced patients. Lack of drug interaction data prompted a pharmacokinetic substudy to minimize subject risk.. Multi-center, open-label, selectively randomized, steady-state pharmacokinetic study in HIV-infected subjects.. A planned independent interim review occurred after at least eight subjects were randomized to each arm. Subjects received twice daily LPV/RTV 400/100 mg (arm A; n = 8); fosamprenavir/RTV 700/100 mg (arm B; n = 8) or LPV/RTV/fosamprenavir 400/100/700 mg (arm C; n = 17). Plasma samples were collected over 12 h between study weeks 2 and 4. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared based on a one-sided t-test on log-transformed data with a Peto stopping boundary (P < 0.001).. Amprenavir mean area under the curve over 12 h (AUC0-12 h) and concentration at 12 h (C12 h) (microg/ml) were, respectively, 42.7 microg x h/ml (range, 33.1-55.1) and 2.4 microg/ml (range, 1.4-3.2) in arm B and 17.4 microg x h/ml (range, 4.6-41.3) and 0.9 microg/ml (range, 0.2-2.7) in arm C: geometric mean ratio (GMR) arm C:B was 0.36 [99.9% upper confidence boundary (UCB), 0.64] and 0.31 (99.9% h UCB, 0.61), respectively (P < or = 0.0001). Lopinavir AUC0-12 h and C12 h were, respectively, 95.3 microg x h/ml (range, 60.3-119.3) and 6.3 microg/ml (range, 2.2-9.2) in arm A and 54.4 microg x h/ml (range, 23.5-112.2) and 3.0 microg/ml (range, 0.4-7.9) in arm C: GMR arm C:A of 0.52 (99.9% UCB, 0.89) and 0.39 (99.9% UCB, 0.98), respectively (P < or = 0.0008). Ritonavir exposure was not significantly different between arms.. APV and LPV exposures are significantly reduced using LPV/RTV/fosamprenavir, possibly increasing the risk of virologic failure. Consequently, A5143 was closed to enrollment.

Topics: Adult; Carbamates; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Organophosphates; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome

Objectives To compare the efficacy and tolerability of indinavir (IDV)/ritonavir (RTV) at 800/100 and 400/100 mg twice daily (bid) in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive patients. Methods An open comparison of two groups of ART-naive patients treated with IDV/RTV 800/100 or 400/100 mg bid plus two nucleoside analogues was carried out. Viral load, CD4 cell count and tolerability were measured at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48. IDV plasma concentrations were measured retrospectively. Results A total of 107 patients were included in the study. Of these, 57 were treated with 800/100 and 50 with 400/100 mg IDV/RTV bid. At week 48, a viral load of <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL was achieved by 77 and 64% of the patients, respectively, and the median CD4 cell count increases were +171 and +164 cells/muL (intent-to-treat; P not significant), respectively. Side effects leading to protease inhibitor discontinuation occurred in 61% of subjects in the 800/100 mg group vs. 20% in the 400/100 mg group (P<0.0001). Switching from 800/100 to 400/100 mg dosage improved adverse events in 16 of 20 patients. IDV concentrations were above 0.15 mg/L in 89% of the 28 patients tested in the 400/100 mg group. Conclusions Indinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg bid provided the same efficacy as 800/100 mg bid at 48 weeks in an ART-naive population, but safety and tolerance were significantly better for 400/100 mg, while convenience was also improved and cost was reduced.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Viral Load

The selection of in vivo resistance to lopinavir was characterized by analyzing the longitudinal isolates from 54 protease inhibitor-experienced subjects who either experienced incomplete virologic response or viral rebound subsequent to initial response while on treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir in Phase II and III studies. The evolution of incremental resistance to lopinavir (emergence of new mutation[s] and/or at least a twofold increase in phenotypic resistance compared to baseline isolates) was highly dependent on the baseline phenotype and genotype. Among the subjects demonstrating evolution of lopinavir resistance, mutations at positions 82, 54, and 46 in human immunodeficiency virus protease emerged frequently, suggesting that these mutations are important for conferring high-level resistance. Less common mutations, such as L33F, I50V, and V32I together with I47V/A, were also selected; however, new mutations at positions 84, 90, and 71 were not observed. The emergence of incremental resistance contrasts greatly with the low incidence of resistance observed after initiating lopinavir-ritonavir therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients, suggesting that partial resistance accumulated during prior protease inhibitor therapy can compromise the genetic barrier to resistance to lopinavir-ritonavir. The emergence of incremental resistance was uncommon in subjects whose baseline isolates contained eight or more mutations associated with lopinavir resistance and/or displayed >60-fold-reduced susceptibility to lopinavir, providing insight into suitable upper genotypic and phenotypic breakpoints for lopinavir-ritonavir.

Topics: Amino Acid Substitution; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mutation; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sequence Analysis

Atazanavir (ATV) is a novel protease inhibitor that has been recently introduced into therapy of HIV infection. Currently there is little data on ATV therapy from daily practice.. In this retrospective study, we report on ATV efficacy and safety in clinical routine. Drug monitoring was performed consisting of unscheduled single measurements and a 4-hour-profile. Trough concentration of >80 ng/ml and peak concentration of 2000-6000 ng/ml were regarded as sufficient.. Between May 2003 and April 2004, ATV treatment was started in 42 patients, mean observation time was 32 weeks (6-53). Mean age was 45.6 years, 38% had prior AIDS, viral load was undetectable in 73%. Important side effects were minor or moderate diarrhea (27%) and fatigue (15%). ATV was discontinued in 10% due to side effects or malignant diseases. No significant influence on mean values of cholesterol, triglycerides, liver enzymes, CD4-cell-count, and HI-viral load was seen. Virologic failure occurred in 13% of patients, all of them were PI-experienced. Pharmacokinetic data are available for 32 patients, all patients had sufficient trough levels. 30% with unboosted ATV and 21% with boosted ATV had peak plasma concentrations below the level defined as sufficient. Mean trough levels, plasma profile and AUC did not differ significantly between groups with non-boosted versus boosted ATV regimes but showed a wide inter-patient variability.. ATV treatment of HIV-infected patients with or without a RTV booster was safe and effective in clinical routine. Drug levels were sufficient in the majority of cases. The variability of pharmacokinetic results in our sample supports therapeutic drug monitoring in patients treated with ATV.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Clinical Chemistry Tests; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hematologic Tests; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, characteristics and risk factors of lipid changes associated with lopinavir/ritonavir treatment in antiretroviral-naive patients.. A prospective cohort of 107 antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients was followed for 12 months after starting lopinavir/ritonavir-based highly active antiretroviral therapy.. At 12 months, percentages of patients with hypercholesterolaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia were 17.4% and 40%, respectively. Mean increases in total cholesterol and triglycerides were 40.7 and 73.3 mg/dL. There was a significant increase in both low-density and high-density (HDL) cholesterol, and no increase in the total cholesterol/HDL ratio (from 4.16 at baseline to 4.49 after 12 months). Baseline cholesterol > 200 mg/dL and triglycerides > 150 mg/dL were independent risk factors for dyslipidaemia, while hepatitis C coinfection appeared to be protective.. Patients with elevated lipid values at baseline have the greatest risk of developing hypercholesterolaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia after starting lopinavir/ritonavir. Antiretroviral-naive patients coinfected with hepatitis C have a low risk of developing hyperlipidaemia after starting lopinavir/ritonavir.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hyperlipidemias; Hypertriglyceridemia; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Triglycerides

Protease inhibitors are an effective component of combination antiretroviral treatment for children infected with human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1), but tolerance or toxicity issues sometimes require an alternative therapeutic strategy.. HIV-1-infected children aged 2-17 years received combination therapy with either stavudine plus ritonavir or with zidovudine, lamivudine, and ritonavir as part of a randomized clinical trial. Twenty-one months after the start of the trial, ritonavir in capsule formulation became unavailable. The treatment regimen for 25 children was switched from ritonavir capsules to indinavir capsules (500 mg/m(2) every 8 h). The other study drugs remained unchanged. A matched-pairs analysis was performed to compare the results for these 25 children with the results for 25 matched children whose treatment regimen continued to include ritonavir (in liquid formulation).. There were no significant differences in the percentage of children with an HIV-1 RNA load of

Topics: Adolescent; Area Under Curve; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Infant; Male; Ritonavir; Viral Load

To compare the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 800/200 mg administered once daily in the morning compared with the evening.. This was a randomized, two-way, cross-over study in HIV+ subjects. In each subject the pharmacokinetics of each drug were characterized after 2 weeks of LPV/r 800/200 mg administered once daily at 08.00 h and 19.00 h. On study days, LPV/r was taken with a standardized meal (800 kCal, 25% from fat) after fasting for at least 5 h. LPV/r concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS, and the data were analyzed by noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis.. Fourteen subjects completed the study (all men, mean age/weight 44 year/81 kg). The median (interquartile range) LPV AUC(0,24 h), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (C(24 h)) after am and pm dosing was, respectively, 143 (116-214) mg l(-1) h, 12.8 (10.3-17.2) mg l(-1), 1.34 (0.58-3.25) mg l(-1), and 171 (120-232) mg l(-1) h, 12.9 (8.22-16.3) mg l(-1), 1.15 (0.59-1.98) mg l(-1). The geometric mean ratio (GMR, am : pm) and 95% CI of the LPV AUC(0,24 h), C(max), and C(24 h) was 0.91 (0.79, 1.06), 1.11 (0.94, 1.32), and 1.19 (0.72, 1.96), respectively. The median ritonavir C(max) after am and pm dosing was 1.05 and 0.90 mg l(-1), respectively. The GMR (95% CI) of the RTV AUC(0,24 h), C(max), and C(24 h) was 0.93 (0.80, 1.08), 1.27 (1.00, 1.63), and 1.04 (0.68, 1.60), respectively. Administration of LPV/r in a once-daily regimen was generally well tolerated.. No differences were observed in the pharmacokinetics of LPV/r after am or pm dosing with food, which suggests that this once daily combination, can be taken in the morning or evening. Such flexibility in dosing may improve adherence.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily saquinavir-soft-gel-capsules/ritonavir (SQV-SGC/RTV) 1600 mg/100 mg plus dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in HIV-infected patients with plasma viral load (pVL) <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL following 3 years of antiretroviral therapy.. A total of 69 patients with pVL <50 copies/mL after 162 weeks of antiretroviral treatment started SQV-SGC/RTV 1600 mg/100 mg once-daily while continuing dual NRTIs. Previous treatment consisted of 66 weeks of treatment with a half/full dose of zidovudine (ZDV)/zalcitabine (ddC), followed by 2 years of SQV-SGC twice a day (bid) plus ZDV/lamivudine (3TC) or didanosine (ddI)/stavudine (d4T). Efficacy (pVL), safety and immunological changes (CD4 cell counts) were evaluated after 48 weeks in this open-label, single-arm prospective study.. SQV-SGC/RTV once-daily was well tolerated. No patient changed regimens or was lost to follow-up. After 48 weeks, 63 of 69 patients (91%) had pVL <50 copies/mL (five of the six remaining patients had pVL <400 copies/mL, and one patient had an unexplained rise to 39 500 copies/mL, which decreased to <50 copies/mL 12 weeks later). Median CD4 count increased from 534 cells/muL at the start of the SQV-SGC/RTV once-daily treatment to 664 cells/muL (P<0.001). Compared to the preceding 48 weeks on bid SQV-SGC, the CD4 cell count improved significantly on once-daily SQV-SGC/RTV (P<0.001).. These data support the use of SQV-SGC/RTV 1600 mg/100 mg once-daily with two NRTIs as a convenient, safe and cost-saving regimen to maintain viral suppression and CD4 counts for 48 weeks in this preselected cohort on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with pVL <50 copies/mL. The CD4 count rise may be a result of continued immune reconstitution in patients with well-controlled infection.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Triglycerides; Viral Load

To evaluate atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV) (300/100 mg) once daily, atazanavir/saquinavir (ATV/SQV) (400/1200 mg) once daily, and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) (400/100 mg) twice daily, each with tenofovir (300 mg) once daily and a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients.. Randomized, open-label, 48-week multicenter trial of 358 randomized adult patients who had failed two or more prior HAART regimens with baseline HIV RNA > or = 1000 copies/ml and CD4 cell count > or = 50 x 10(6) cells/l.. The primary efficacy endpoint [plasma HIV RNA reduction assessed by time-averaged difference (TAD)] was similar for ATV/RTV and LPV/RTV [TAD 0.13; 97.5% confidence interval, -0.12 to 0.39] at 48 weeks. Mean reductions from baseline for ATV/RTV and LPV/RTV were comparable at 1.93 and 1.87 log10 copies/ml, respectively. Mean CD4 cell count increases were 110 and 121 x 10(6) cells/l for ATV/RTV, and LPV/RTV, respectively. The efficacy of ATV/SQV was lower than LPV/RTV by both these parameters. Declines in total cholesterol and fasting triglycerides were greater with ATV/RTV and ATV/SQV than with LPV/RTV (P < or = 0.005). Lipids in the LPV/RTV arm at week 48 generally increased from baseline. Lipid-lowering agents were used more frequently in the LPV/RTV arm than in the ATV arms (P < 0.05 versus ATV/RTV), as were antidiarrheal agents (P < or = 0.04 versus both ATV treatments). No new or unique safety findings emerged.. ATV boosted with RTV is as effective and well tolerated as LPV/RTV in treatment-experienced patients, with a more favorable impact on serum lipids. Pharmacokinetically enhanced ATV provides a suitable choice for therapy of treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lipids; Lopinavir; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Tenofovir; Viral Load

The genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) has been proposed as a way to integrate drug exposure and genotypic resistance to protease inhibitors and can be useful to enhance the predictivity of virologic response for boosted protease inhibitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictivity of the GIQ in 116 protease inhibitor-experienced patients treated with lopinavir-ritonavir. The overall decrease in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA from baseline to month 6 was a median of -1.50 log(10) copies/ml and 40% of patients had plasma HIV-1 RNA below 400 copies/ml at month 6. The overall median lopinavir study-state C(min) concentration was 5,856 ng/ml. Using univariate linear regression analyses, both lopinavir GIQ and the number of baseline lopinavir mutations were highly associated with virologic response through 6 months. In the multivariate analysis, only lopinavir GIQ, baseline HIV RNA, and the number of prior protease inhibitors were significantly associated with response. When the analysis was limited to patients with more highly mutant viruses (three or more lopinavir mutations), only lopinavir GIQ remained significantly associated with virologic response. This study suggests that GIQ could be a better predictor of the virologic response than virological (genotype) or pharmacological (minimal plasma concentration) approaches used separately, especially among patients with at least three protease inhibitor resistance mutations. Therapeutic drug monitoring for patients treated by lopinavir-ritonavir would likely be most useful in patients with substantially resistant viruses.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Linear Models; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral

To study the pharmacokinetics of indinavir/ ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily in antiretroviral-naive patients at Srinagarind Hospital in Khon Kaen, Thailand.. This was a steady-state, open-label pharmacokinetic study of 19 patients. A 12 h pharmacokinetic curve was recorded after an overnight fast. Plasma levels of indinavir and ritonavir were determined by a validated HPLC method. Virological failure was defined according to the most recent US Department of Health and Human Services guidelines as a viral load above 400 copies/ml at week 24.. Median baseline values for CD4 and viral load were 13cells/mm3 and 167000 copies/ml, respectively. The median (interquartile ranges) for indinavir AUC, Cmax and Cmin were 18.1 (15.3-23.8) mg/l x h, 4.1 (3.6-4.8) mg/l and 0.17 (0.12-0.30) mg/l, respectively. These values represent 37%, 39% and 24% of the AUC, Cmax and Cmin values found, respectively, for the indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg dose in HIV-1-infected Thai patients. Short-term virological response was satisfactory. There were three subjects with an indinavir Cmin. below the target value of 0.10 mg/l, of whom one had virological failure (33%). Among the other 16 subjects with an indinavir Cmin above 0.10 mg/l, there was also one virological failure (6%) (P=0.30).. Indinavir exposure in this reduced-dose regimen of 400 mg with 100 mg ritonavir twice daily was more than dose-proportionally lower than previously observed with the indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg twice daily regimen. Therapeutic Cmin levels of indinavir were achieved in >80% of the subjects and short-term virological response was satisfactory in this cohort of patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy at an advanced disease stage with high baseline viral loads.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Cohort Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Hospitals; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Stavudine; Thailand

Relationships between adherence to protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy and resistance development have not been fully characterized.. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled study of lopinavir/ritonavir versus nelfinavir, each administered with stavudine and lamivudine, in 653 antiretroviral-naive, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected patients. Relationships between adherence and probability of resistance development were evaluated by local linear regression or logistic regression.. A higher risk of detectable HIV-1 RNA loads after week 24 was associated with lower adherence (odds ratio [OR], 1.08 per 1% decrease in adherence [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.05-1.10]; P<.001) and nelfinavir use (OR, 2.4 vs. lopinavir/ritonavir [95% CI, 1.6-3.6]; P<.001). Among all nelfinavir-treated patients, a bell-shaped relationship between adherence and the risk of nelfinavir resistance was observed, with a maximum probability of 20% at 85%-90% adherence. No lopinavir resistance was observed. A bell-shaped relationship was also observed for the probability of lamivudine resistance, with a maximum probability of 50% at 75%-80% adherence to nelfinavir and of 15% at 80%-85% adherence to lopinavir/ritonavir.. Bell-shaped relationships between adherence and resistance were observed. Irrespective of adherence level, the risk of detectable HIV-1 RNA loads or of PI or lamivudine resistance was significantly higher in nelfinavir-treated patients than in lopinavir/ritonavir-treated patients.

Topics: Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Nelfinavir; Odds Ratio; Patient Compliance; Pyrimidinones; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

To evaluate antiviral activity, tolerability, and safety of the protease inhibitor (PI) TMC114 boosted with low-dose ritonavir (RTV).. A randomized, open-label, controlled, phase IIA clinical trial in 15 sites in Europe with 50 HIV-1-infected patients who had taken multiple PIs.. At entry, PIs in non-suppressive regimens were replaced with TMC114/RTV (300/100 or 600/100 mg twice daily, or 900/100 mg once daily) or left unchanged for 14 days. The time-averaged difference (DAVG) in HIV-1 RNA from baseline, change in HIV-1 RNA from baseline, proportions achieving plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/ml and > or = 0.5 and > or = 1.0 log10 copies/ml reductions in HIV-1 RNA, and safety were assessed.. DAVG responses in all TMC114/RTV groups (range, -0.56 to -0.81 log10 copies/ml) were significantly greater (P < 0.001) than in the controls (-0.03 log10 copies/ml). Median change at day 14 was -1.38 and +0.02 log10 copies/ml for all TMC114/RTV groups and the control group, respectively. A reduction of > or = 0.5 and > or = 1.0 log10 copies/ml was attained by 97% and 76% of patients, respectively, in all TMC114/RTV groups and by 25% and 17%, respectively, in the control group. HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/ml at any time during treatment was achieved by 40% in the TMC114/RTV groups and 8% in the control group. Most common reported adverse events were gastrointestinal and central nervous system disorders (mild to moderate severity). No dose relationship was observed. Biochemical, haematological and electrocardiographic parameters showed no significant changes.. TMC114/RTV demonstrated a potent antiretroviral effect over 14 days in multiple-PI-experienced patients and was generally well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Darunavir; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

We evaluated the effect of salvage antiretroviral therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) on the immune system of heavily antiretroviral pretreated HIV-infected children. We carried out a longitudinal study in 20 antiretroviral experienced HIV-infected children to determine the changes in several immunological parameters (T cell subsets, thymic function) every 3 months during 18 months of follow-up on salvage therapy with LPV/r. Statistical analyses were performed with the Wilcoxon test, taking as a reference the basal value at the entry in the study. HIV-infected children showed an increase of CD4+ T cells, a decrease in CD8+ T cells, and an increase in T cell rearrangement excision circle (TRECs) levels. The percentage of HIV children with undetectable viral load (VL < or = 400 copies/ml) increased significantly (p = 0.007) and the percentage with SI viral phenotype decreased significantly (p = 0.002) at the end of the study. Thus, the viral phenotype changed to NSI/R5 after salvage therapy with LPV/r. Interestingly, we observed a significant decrease of memory (CD4+ CD45RO+) and a moderate decrease of activated (CD4+ HLA-DR+, CD4+ HLA-DR+CD38, CD4+, CD45RO+HLA-DR+) CD4+ T cells during the follow-up. On the other hand, memory (CD8+ CD45RO+ and CD8+ CD45RO+CD38+), activated (CD8+ HLA-DR+CD38+, CD8+ HLA-DR+, CD8+ CD38+), and effector (CD8+ CD57+, CD8+ CD28(-)CD57+) CD8+ T cells had a very significant decrease during follow-up. Our data indicate an immune system reconstitution in heavily pretreated HIV-infected children in response to salvage therapy with LPV/r as a consequence of a decrease in immune system activation and an increase in thymic function.

Topics: Adolescent; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Immunologic Memory; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; T-Lymphocyte Subsets; Thymus Gland; Treatment Outcome

To describe the in vivo protein-binding characteristics of indinavir (IDV) in the presence of ritonavir (RTV) relative to total IDV plasma concentrations.. The ACTG protocol 5055 was a multicenter study comparing the safety and pharmacokinetics of IDV/RTV at doses of 800/200 and 400/400 mg twice daily in HIV-infected adults.. Forty-four patients underwent a 12-h intensive pharmacokinetic assessment after 2 weeks of therapy. Three plasma samples from 35 patients at Cmax, 6 and 12 h post dose were used to determine the unbound IDV concentrations. Unbound IDV was separated in plasma samples using ultra-filtration and measured using high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection.. Mean IDV protein-bound fraction across all time points in the 800/200 and 400/400 arm were 53.4 and 51.8%, respectively. In the 800/200 arm, percentage binding at Cmax was 50% compared with 56% at 12 h (P = 0.008). In the 400/400 arm, percentage binding at Cmax was 49% compared with 54% at 12 h (P = 0.008).. The extent of plasma protein binding of IDV in this study was less than in previously published data with IDV alone. Although IDV concentrations differed across the arms, the percentage of IDV protein binding at all time points was not different between the 800/200 and 400/400 arms. However, the percentage of IDV protein binding at Cmax was significantly lower compared with 12 h in each arm, possibly suggesting that IDV protein binding is concentration-dependent. These data suggest that RTV affects IDV protein-binding characteristics and IDV also exhibits concentration dependent binding when administered with RTV.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Protein Binding; Ritonavir

Recommended antiretroviral regimens include a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) component. Class cross-resistance and mitochondrial toxicity are recognized as problems with this class of antiretrovirals.. In a pilot open-label study, 65 antiretroviral-naive and 21 experienced but nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive HIV-1-infected adults were given a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir (533.3/133.3 mg twice daily) and efavirenz (600 mg once daily) for 48 weeks.. At baseline, the mean viral load was 4.84 log10 copies/mL and the mean CD4 count was 311 cells/mm. At week 24, the proportions of patients with a viral load <400 copies/mL were 78% and 93% using an intent-to-treat and on-treatment analysis, respectively. At week 48, proportions were 73% and 97%, respectively. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 21 patients during the 48-week period, with 33% of those attributable to drug-related adverse effects. A viral load >400 copies/mL at week 24 or 48 was associated with nonadherence in 3 patients and virologic failure in 1 patient. After an increase during the first 8 weeks, fasting lipid levels remained stable up to 48 weeks.. The lopinavir/ritonavir-efavirenz combination is associated with a high rate of virologic response and should be compared with more classic NRTI-containing regimens in randomized and controlled clinical trials.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Tolerance; Female; France; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Safety

Hypertension is an important modifiable cardiac risk factor in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Calcium channel blockers are substrates of cytochrome P450 3A and are commonly prescribed for hypertension. We evaluated potential bidirectional pharmacokinetic interactions between calcium channel blockers and coadministered indinavir and ritonavir.. Healthy HIV- seronegative subjects received 120 mg diltiazem daily or 5 mg amlodipine daily for days 1 to 7 and 20 to 26. All subjects received 100 mg ritonavir and 800 mg indinavir every 12 hours on days 8 to 26. Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetic collection was performed on days 7 and 26, with 12-hour collection on day 19.. Indinavir plus ritonavir increased the median amlodipine area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC) by 89.8%, from 122 to 230 ng.h/mL (n = 18, P < .0001), and increased the median diltiazem AUC by 26.5%, from 800 to 1060 ng.h/mL (n = 13, P = .06). Of 13 subjects, 2 (15%) had greater than 4-fold increases in diltiazem AUC. Desacetyldiltiazem AUC increased by 102.2% (P = .001), and desmethyldiltiazem AUC decreased by 27.4% (P = .01). Neither amlodipine nor diltiazem affected steady-state AUCs of the protease inhibitors. No serious cardiovascular adverse effects were observed.. Indinavir plus ritonavir increases the AUCs of both amlodipine and diltiazem, which may result in an increased response. If coadministration is indicated, amlodipine or diltiazem should be initiated at low doses with careful titration to response and side effects.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amlodipine; Calcium Channel Blockers; Diltiazem; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hypertension; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir

The normalized inhibitory quotient (NIQ) has been proposed as a measure for refining the precision of HIV resistance testing when selecting antiretroviral therapy (ART). We undertook an assessment of NIQ and 48-week virological outcome in patients commencing ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) regimens.. A cohort of 87 HIV-infected individuals who all had extensive prior exposure to ART were assigned a new boosted PI regimen following resistance testing. PI therapy consisted of lopinavir, indinavir, saquinavir and amprenavir at 50, 32, 11 and 6%, respectively. Fold change (FC) for each PI was determined from the resistance test at baseline. Trough drug concentration (Cmin) was determined at week 4.. NIQ was derived individually by taking the logarithm of the ratio of Cmin/FC divided by the fixed ratio of population mean trough drug concentration/clinical cut off. Associations between viral load (VL) response over 48 weeks with baseline VL, FC, Cmin, NIQ and selected PI were assessed.. Mean change from baseline VL reduced by 0.83 log at week 48. In multivariate analyses, baseline VL and NIQ were the parameters most associated with change from baseline VL at week 48 (P = 0.012 and 0.003, respectively). FC, Cmin and selected PI were not significantly associated with VL changes.. In this cohort of highly treatment-experienced individuals treated with boosted PI regimens, baseline VL and NIQ were significantly predictive of virological response over 48 weeks whereas FC and Cmin were not. These results support the use of a NIQ at week 4, as a tool for predicting response to therapy in this setting.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Resistance, Viral; Follow-Up Studies; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Phenotype; Prognosis; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Salvage Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The aim of the study was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of indinavir, define the relationship between the pharmacokinetics of indinavir and ritonavir, and to identify the factors influencing the pharmacokinetics of indinavir alone or when given with ritonavir.. HIV-1-infected patients being treated with an indinavir-containing regimen were included. During regular visits, 102 blood samples were collected for the determination of plasma indinavir and ritonavir concentrations. Full pharmacokinetic curves were available from 45 patients. Concentrations of indinavir and ritonavir were determined by liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effect modelling (NONMEM).. The disposition of indinavir was best described by a single compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. Values for the clearance, volume of distribution and the absorption rate constant were 46.8 l h(-1) (24.2% IIV), 82.3 l (24.6% IIV) and 02.62 h(-1), respectively. An absorption lag-time of 0.485 h was detected in patients also taking ritonavir. Furthermore this drug, independent of dose (100-400 mg) or plasma concentration, decreased the clearance of indinavir by 64.6%. In contrast, co-administration of efavirenz or nevirapine increased the clearance of indinavir by 41%, irrespective of the presence or absence of ritonavir. Female patients had a 48% higher apparent bioavailability of indinavir than males.. The pharmacokinetic parameters of indinavir were adequately described by our population model. Female gender and concomitant use of ritonavir and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors strongly influenced the pharmacokinetics of this drug. The results support the concept of ritonavir boosting, maximum inhibition of indinavir metabolized being observed at 100 mg.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Ritonavir

Few data are available regarding clinical outcomes or dosing requirements for the protease inhibitor ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children younger than under 24 months of age.. This prospective, multicenter phase I/II open label treatment trial used ritonavir, zidovudine and lamivudine to treat protease inhibitor-naive, HIV-infected infants between the ages of 4 weeks and 24 months. Two sequential dosing cohorts were treated with 350 or 450 mg/m(2) ritonavir every 12 hours; this report includes results of pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability and efficacy through 104 weeks of follow-up of all subjects.. Fifty HIV-infected children were treated. By week 16, 36 had achieved HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL (72% intent-to-treat, 84% as-treated analysis); by week 104, 18 maintained durable viral suppression (36% intent-to-treat, 46% as-treated). Poor medication adherence by caregiver report contributed to virologic failure. Few subjects experienced treatment-limiting toxicity: emesis or ritonavir refusal in 6 (12%); and severe but reversible anemia or elevated serum hepatic transaminases in 1 (4%) each. Apparent oral clearance was higher and the median predose concentrations were substantially lower than those found in adults. Median z scores for weight and height for age/gender were below normal at baseline but improved by week 104.. A combination regimen of ritonavir, zidovudine and lamivudine was generally safe and produced sustained viral suppression in more than one-third of infants who initiated therapy before 2 years of age. Improved palatability of liquid preparations of protease inhibitors, supporting infrastructure and behavioral approaches to improve medication adherence with antiretrovirals will likely be necessary to further improve efficacy.

Topics: Age Factors; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Lamivudine; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Ritonavir; Severity of Illness Index; Single-Blind Method; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Zidovudine

Blood lipid abnormalities in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) have been associated with exposure to protease inhibitors (PIs), particularly ritonavir. First therapy with a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) leads to relatively favourable lipid profiles. We report on medium-term lipid profiles (up to 5 years) for antiretroviral-naive patients starting NNRTI- and PI-based HAART in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.. Since April 2000, blood samples taken at visits scheduled every 6 months have been analysed for cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations. For 1065 antiretroviral-naive patients starting HAART after April 2000, we estimated changes in concentration over time using multivariate linear regression with adjustment for baseline covariates, use of lipid-lowering drugs and whether the sample was taken in a fasting state.. Non-high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels increase with increasing exposure to either PI- or NNRTI-based therapy, HDL cholesterol levels increase and triglyceride levels decrease with increasing exposure to NNRTI-based therapy, whereas triglyceride levels increase with increasing exposure to PI-based therapy. Between NNRTI-based therapies, there is a slight difference in triglyceride levels, which tend to increase with increasing exposure to efavirenz and to decrease with increasing exposure to nevirapine. Of the three common PI-based therapies, nelfinavir appears to have a relatively favourable lipid profile, with little change with increasing exposure. Of the other two PI therapies, lopinavir with ritonavir has a more favourable profile than indinavir with ritonavir, with smaller increases in both non-HDL cholesterol and triglycerides and an increase in HDL cholesterol. Increasing exposure to abacavir is associated with a decrease in the level of triglycerides.. In general, NNRTI-based therapy is associated with a more favourable lipid profile than PI-based therapy, but different PI-based therapies are associated with very different lipid profiles. Nelfinavir appears to have a relatively favourable lipid profile. Of the two boosted PI therapies, lopinavir appears to have a more favourable lipid profile than indinavir.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Lipids; Male; Prospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Switzerland; Triglycerides

To evaluate the long-term pharmacokinetics and safety of adding ritonavir 100 mg twice-daily to a nelfinavir 1250 mg twice-daily regimen in HIV-infected patients.. This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled 24-week study. Sixteen patients receiving a nelfinavir 1250 mg twice-daily regimen with plasma viral load <1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL were randomized to continue treatment or to have ritonavir 100 mg twice-daily added. Safety, including fasting lipid levels, was evaluated at weeks 4, 12 and 24. Patients who were randomized to have ritonavir added (n=9) participated in three 12-h pharmacokinetic evaluations at baseline, week 4 and week 24.. Increases in median nelfinavir steady-state plasma concentrations at 12 h (C(12)) from 512 to 773 ng/mL [median difference 450 ng/mL; 95% confidence interval (CI) 116--1510 ng/mL] and in median active nelfinavir metabolite M 8 C(12) from 107 to 603 ng/mL (median difference 545 ng/mL; 95% CI 370--891) were seen after the addition of low-dose ritonavir (baseline to week 24). There were no differences between the nelfinavir or M 8 pharmacokinetic parameters at weeks 4 and 24. No significant changes or differences in the concentration of fasting total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol or total triglycerides or in the occurrence of adverse events were observed within or between the two groups.. Nelfinavir and especially M 8 concentrations are increased when low-dose ritonavir is added to a nelfinavir-containing regimen. The combination seems to be safe and the nelfinavir/ritonavir regimen could be an option in patients with low nelfinavir+M 8 concentrations.

Topics: Adult; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Nelfinavir; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Viral Load

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) initiation in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been associated with transaminase and HCV viral load flares. Previous studies have included highly variable antiretroviral regimens. We compared effects of 2 protease inhibitor-based regimens on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and HCV loads in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients initiating HAART.. Seventy HIV-infected patients with positive baseline results of HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay from a treatment trial comparing lopinavir-ritonavir with nelfinavir were evaluated during a 48-week period. HCV and HIV titers were analyzed at baseline, at weeks 24 and 48 of treatment, and during flares in the ALT level of >5 times the upper limit of normal.. A total of 57 of 70 patients tested positive for HCV RNA at baseline. HCV titers for patients in lopinavir-ritonavir and nelfinavir groups, respectively, were as follows: baseline, 6.07 and 6.22 log IU/mL; week 24 of treatment, 6.68 and 6.48 log IU/mL; and week 48 of treatment, 6.32 and 6.44 log IU/mL. Of patients with a CD4+ cell count of <100 cells/mm3 at baseline, 5 of 11 in the nelfinavir group and 0 of 10 in the lopinavir-ritonavir group had an increase in the HCV load of >0.5 log IU/mL from baseline to week 48. The mean ALT level increased by 45 U/L at 24 weeks and 18 U/L at 48 weeks in the nelfinavir group but decreased by 18 U/L at 24 weeks and 7 U/L at 48 weeks in the lopinavir-ritonavir group. Eight patients in the nelfinavir group and 2 patients in the lopinavir-ritonavir group had grade 3 or 4 flares in the ALT level.. HAART initiation is associated with increased HCV loads and ALT levels. A low baseline CD4+ cell count is associated with persistent increases in the HCV RNA load in nelfinavir-treated patients. These results warrant careful interpretation of abnormalities in the ALT load after HAART initiation in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients to prevent premature discontinuation of treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nelfinavir; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

Differential exposure to saquinavir/ritonavir may lead to therapy failure. The objective was to identify factors that influence variability of saquinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations.. Saquinavir/ritonavir data, dosed as 1600/100 mg once daily, from three separate pharmacokinetic studies, in 45 patients from Thailand and the UK, were pooled. Pharmacokinetic parameters were based on non-compartmental analysis. Univariate analysis was performed with saquinavir as the dependent variable, and ritonavir area under the curve (AUC), gender, body weight, body mass index (BMI) and study site as independent variables. Variables with a P value <0.10 were included in a multivariate linear regression analysis.. Higher saquinavir AUCs, maximum concentrations (Cmax) and minimum concentrations (Cmin) were seen in Thai patients than in UK patients. Univariate analysis showed associations between body weight, gender, study site and ritonavir AUC and saquinavir AUC (P < 0.05), whereas BMI (P = 0.13) did not. In the multivariate analysis, ritonavir AUC (P = 0.0001) and study site (P = 0.0021) were significantly related to saquinavir AUC (R2 = 0.50).. The ritonavir AUC and study site appeared to be related to exposure of saquinavir. Study site should be viewed as the total of country- and study-specific differences--such as differences in lifestyle, environment, genetic background and dietary composition--between the analysed studies.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Area Under Curve; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Geography; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sex Characteristics; Thailand; United Kingdom

To assess the rate of protocol-defined treatment failure and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and saquinavir/ritonavir (SAQ/r).. Open-label, prospective, randomized (1:1), international multi-centre trial.. Adult HIV-1-infected patients were assigned LPV/r 400/100 mg twice daily or SAQ/r 1000/100 mg twice daily with two or more nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)/non-NRTIs. All patients, whether on or off the assigned treatment, were followed for 48 weeks.. Of 339 randomized patients, 324 initiated assigned treatment (intention-to-treat/exposed [ITT/e] population). At 48 weeks, treatment failure occurred in 29/163 (18%) and 53/161 (33%) of patients in the LPV/r and SAQ/r arms, respectively (ITT/e, P = 0.002, log rank test). In an analysis that also considered those patients who discontinued treatment as having failed treatment (ITT/e/discontinuation = failure), 40/161 (25%) LPV/r-treated individuals versus 63/161 (39%) SAQ/R-treated individuals failed treatment (P = 0.005, log rank test). Discontinuation of the assigned treatment occurred in 23/163 (14%) patients in the LPV/r-treated group, compared with 48/161 (300%) in the SAQ/r-treated group (ITT/e; P = 0.001). The primary reasons for premature discontinuation were non-fatal adverse events (LPV/r: 12/163; SAQ/r: 21/161) and patients' choice (LPV/r: 7/163; SAQ/r: 8/161). In the on-treatment analysis of time to treatment failure, no difference was observed between the two arms (P = 0.27, log rank test).. LPV/r had better antiretroviral effects compared with SAQ/r at the doses and in the formulations studied. This may have been a result of patients' preferences and ability to adhere to assigned therapy, rather than a result of differences in the intrinsic potency of the study protease inhibitors.

Topics: Adult; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome

To assess the efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), as induction therapy before enrollment in a randomized trial of structured treatment interruption strategies.. Two-hundred antiretroviral-naive patients with CD4+ cell counts between 200-350 at screening were enrolled in this open-label 24week study.. Patients were followed up every 8 weeks for CD4+ cells, HIV RNA, and clinical and laboratory toxicities.. Two-hundred patients were enrolled with median baseline CD4+ cell count of 267 cells/microl and HIV RNA 50 118 (4.7 log10) copies/mi. After 24 weeks of treatment, 191 of 200 (96%) patients had below 400 copies/ml HIV RNA, with 177/200 (89%) below 50 copies/ml (intent to treat, missing equals failure method), with a median rise in CD4+ cell count of 122 cells/microl. There was no significant correlation between the minimum concentration of saquinavir and HIV RNA reductions at week 8 (P = 0.957) or absolute HIV RNA at week 24 (P = 0.77).. First-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir plus two NRTIs showed strong antiviral efficacy over 24 weeks, and should be evaluated in larger prospective randomized clinical trials.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Thailand; Treatment Outcome

Many human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected children have already failed treatment with 2 or even 3 classes of antiretrovirals. Coformulation of lopinavir with low dose ritonavir exhibits a potent antiretroviral effect. However, the data in heavily pretreated children are still scarce. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of combination therapy including lopinavir/ritonavir in children with prior exposure to all classes of oral antiretrovirals.. This was an open label multicenter observational study, in which data were reviewed according to a standardized protocol. The study population included all HIV-1-infected children with virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA >5000 copies/mL) followed in 12 Spanish hospitals for >12 months, experienced with the 3 classes of oral antiretrovirals, in whom a lopinavir/ritonavir-containing regimen was started.. By March 2003, 45 patients had been treated with lopinavir/ritonavir for a median of 18 months (range, 3-28). The median age at baseline was 9.7 years (range, 4.3-17.1). The median times of prior treatment were 88 months (range, 31-145) with nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors and 42 months (range, 19-63) with protease inhibitors. Twenty-five patients were classified as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention clinical category C. Median values for absolute and percentage CD4 at baseline were 501 (range, 6-1512) and 19% (range, 0.5-49), respectively, and plasma HIV-RNA was 5.0 log10 copies/mL (range, 4.1-6.1). During follow-up, 11 (24%) children switched from liquid to solid formulation. At 48 weeks, the median values for absolute and percentage CD4 increased by 199 cells/microL and 3%, respectively, and median plasma viral load declined 1.75 log10 copies/mL. Forty-two percent of children achieved a plasma RNA of <400 copies/mL (intent to treat analysis). Baseline genotypic resistance was available in 40 children. Nonresponders had 7.0 +/- 1.6 protease inhibitor-associated mutations at baseline compared with 4.8 +/- 1.7 in children achieving virologic suppression (P = 0.06). Adverse events were described in 18 children. Three children permanently discontinued and 4 transiently withdrew lopinavir/ritonavir. At 12 months, there were mild but not significant increases in plasma cholesterol and triglycerides.. Lopinavir/ritonavir when given as part of salvage regimen is well-tolerated, although switching to pills is frequently required. The regimen has a potent and durable antiretroviral activity in most heavily pretreated children, despite the presence of multiple mutations to all classes of oral antiretrovirals.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Salvage Therapy; Treatment Outcome

To assess the pharmacokinetics and 24-week efficacy and safety of dual boosted saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir combination in children.. Twenty reverse transcription inhibitor-pretreated children at 2 centers in Thailand were treated with saquinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir in an open label, single arm, 6-month prospective study. The dosage was 50 mg/kg twice daily (bid) for saquinavir and 230/57.5 mg/m bid for lopinavir/ritonavir. Ten children also received lamivudine.. Samples were collected for a 12-hour pharmacokinetic profile in all children. Plasma concentrations of saquinavir, lopinavir and ritonavir were determined using a validated high performance liquid chromatography technique.. At baseline, the median age was 8.5 years, with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA 4.9 log10 copies/mL, CD4 count 129 cells/microL and CD4%, 6.5%. Median area under the concentration curve at 0-12 hours and Cmin were 39.4 mg/L.h and 1.4 mg/L for saquinavir and 118 mg/L.hr and 5.9 mg/L for lopinavir. After 24 weeks of treatment, HIV RNA was suppressed below 400 copies/mL for 16 of 20 (80%) children (intent-to-treat analysis) and below 50 copies/mL for 12 of 20 children (60%), and CD4% (count) rose by a median of 6% (216 cells/microL). Median changes of triglyceride and total cholesterol were 56 and 36.5 mg/dL, respectively (P = 0.01). Lopinavir Cmin <1 and saquinavir Cmin <0.28 mg/L correlated with HIV RNA >400 copies/mL, and lopinavir Cmax >15 mg/L correlated with rises in cholesterol (P < 0.05).. Plasma drug concentrations of saquinavir, lopinavir and ritonavir were at the higher limits of expected ranges for adult treatment at approved dosages (1000/100 mg bid for saquinavir, 400/100 mg bid for lopinavir/ritonavir). The regimen was well-tolerated and had good efficacy at 24 weeks. This dual boosted protease inhibitor combination should be assessed in larger trials of reverse transcription inhibitor-experienced children.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome

Few combinations of highly active antiretrovirals have been studied in nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor (NRTI)-experienced, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children. We tested the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of 2 combination therapies containing an NRTI, protease inhibitors +/- a nonnucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor (NNRTI).. This was a phase II, randomized, multicenter study. Forty-one children and youths between 5 months and 21 years with prior NRTI and no prior NNRTI or protease inhibitor experience received either nelfinavir (NFV) 30 mg/kg twice daily (bid), ritonavir (RTV) 400 mg/m bid and buffered didanosine (ddI) 240 mg/m daily (arm A) or NFV 50-55 mg/kg bid, nevirapine (NVP) 120 mg/m bid and stavudine (d4T) 1 mg/kg bid (arm B). Patients were evaluated clinically for 48 weeks after initiation of therapy. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling occurred after 4 weeks of therapy.. : The proportion of children with HIV-1 RNA < or =400 copies/mL and on randomized treatment at 48 weeks was 65% among children assigned NFV + RTV + ddI versus 28% among those assigned NFV + NVP + d4T (P = 0.039). No significant difference in median CD4% change from baseline to week 48 was found (3% versus 1%). No significant differences in safety or tolerability between children randomized to NFV + RTV + ddI versus NFV + NVP + d4T were identified. However, a trend toward a higher rate of permanent discontinuation of study treatment was noted among children assigned to NFV + NVP + d4T compared with NFV + RTV + ddI [7 of 20 (35%) versus 2 of 21 (10%); P = 0.12]. NFV pharmacokinetic measurements were not statistically different between the treatment groups, yet exposure to the NFV metabolite, M8, was significantly higher in subjects receiving RTV. The pharmacokinetics for NVP, RTV and d4T were similar to those of previously reported data.. : Combination therapy containing NFV + RTV + ddI appears more efficacious in NRTI-experienced children than a regimen containing NFV + NVP + d4T. Differences in tolerability between the 2 treatment groups were not identified. Systemic exposure of these drugs was similar to that reported in other HIV-infected children and adults.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Child; Child, Preschool; Didanosine; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Infant; Male; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Stavudine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Atazanavir Sulfate; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

To compare change from baseline in HIV RNA and fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients receiving unboosted atazanavir 400 mg once daily versus lopinavir 400 mg boosted with ritonavir 100 mg twice daily, with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Secondary objectives included virologic response, CD4 cell count changes, other lipid changes, safety, and tolerability.. Randomized, open-label, multinational, 48-week study in patients with one PI-regimen failure, HIV RNA > or = 1000 copies/mL, and CD4 count > or = 50 cells/mm3.. Three hundred patients were randomized; 290 treated (144 atazanavir, 146 lopinavir/ritonavir). Lopinavir/ritonavir resulted in a significantly greater reduction in HIV RNA than unboosted atazanavir (-2.02 vs -1.59 log10 copies/mL, p < 0.001) at week 48. Secondary efficacy endpoints also favored lopinavir/ritonavir; the differences in efficacy between regimens were also observed in secondary analyses comparing those subjects who were susceptible and those subjects who were resistant to their respective PIs at baseline. However, both regimens were equally effective in subjects who had no baseline NRTI mutations. From baseline to week 48, atazanavir resulted in either no change or decreases in fasting LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides (-6%, -2%, and +1%), whereas lopinavir/ritonavir resulted in increases (+3%, +12%, and +53%) (p < 0.05, all between-treatment comparisons). Fewer patients were administered lipid-lowering therapy in the atazanavir arm (6% vs 20% for lopinavir/ritonavir). Both regimens were safe and well tolerated.. While both treatments demonstrated good antiviral efficacy, relatively greater antiviral suppression was observed with lopinavir/ritonavir. In those patients with no NRTI mutations at baseline, both regimens demonstrated comparable virologic suppression. Atazanavir-treated patients demonstrated a superior lipid profile and required less frequent lipid-lowering treatment.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, LDL; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Oligopeptides; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Triglycerides

This study evaluated maintenance with lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy vs. continuing lopinavir/ritonavir and 2 nucleosides in HIV-infected patients with suppressed HIV replication.. Randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter, pilot clinical trial.. Adult patients were eligible if they had no history of virologic failure while receiving a protease inhibitor, were receiving 2 nucleosides + lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg b.i.d.) for >1 month and had maintained serum HIV RNA <50 copies/mL for >6 months prior to enrollment.. Forty-two patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to continue or stop the nucleosides. At baseline there were no significant differences between groups in median CD4 cells/muL (baseline or nadir), pre-HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy) HIV log10 viremia, or time with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL prior to enrollment. After 48 weeks of follow-up, percentage of patients remaining at <50 HIV RNA copies/mL (intention to treat, M = F) was 81% for the monotherapy group (95% CI: 64% to 98%) vs. 95% for the triple-therapy group (95% CI: 86% to 100%); P = 0.34. Patients in whom monotherapy failed had significantly worse adherence than patients who remained virally suppressed on monotherapy. Monotherapy failures did not show primary resistance mutations in the protease gene and were successfully reinduced with prerandomization nucleosides. Mean change in CD4 cells/microL: +70 (monotherapy) and +8 (triple) (P = 0.27). Mean serum fasting lipids remained stable in both groups. No serious adverse events were observed.. Most of the patients maintained with lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy remain with undetectable viral load after 48 weeks. Failures of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy were not associated with the development of primary resistance mutations in the protease gene and could be successfully reinduced adding back prior nucleosides.

Topics: Adult; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pilot Projects; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Spain

To assess the efficacy and safety of a once-daily regimen with didanosine, lamivudine, saquinavir, and low-dose ritonavir in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients with tuberculosis treated with rifampin and the influence of rifampin on plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) of saquinavir.. Single-arm, prospective, multicenter, open-label pilot study, including 32 adult ARV-naive subjects with HIV infection and tuberculosis under standard treatment that included rifampin (600 mg q.d.) and isoniazid (300 mg q.d.). After 2 months of tuberculosis treatment, patients were started on once-daily ARV therapy, consisting of didanosine, lamivudine, ritonavir (200 mg), and saquinavir soft gel capsules (1600 mg). HIV RNA level, CD4 cell count, clinical and laboratory toxicity, and saquinavir Ctrough during and after antituberculosis therapy were analyzed.. After 48 weeks of follow-up, 20 of 32 patients (62.5%; 95% CI: 45.8% to 79.2%) in the intent-to-treat population and 20 of 28 (71.4%; 95% CI: 54.4% to 88.4%) in the on-treatment population had an HIV RNA level <50 copies/mL. Treatment tolerance was acceptable in all patients except for 2 with biologic hepatic toxicity leading to discontinuation. Seven patients had virologic failure. In 10 patients (36%), saquinavir Ctrough was <0.05 microg/mL during tuberculosis therapy and 5 of them had virologic failure. The median saquinavir Ctrough was 44% lower (interquartile range: 19% to 71%) with coadministration of rifampin than without.. The combination of didanosine, lamivudine, saquinavir, and ritonavir may be a useful treatment regimen for patients with tuberculosis in whom a once-daily protease inhibitor-containing regimen is considered indicated. Nevertheless, on the basis of pharmacokinetic profile the dose of 1600/200 mg of saquinavir/ritonavir cannot be recommended. Further studies with higher doses of saquinavir (2000 mg) boosted with ritonavir are warranted.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Didanosine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Pilot Projects; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Spain; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Argentina; Clinical Trials as Topic; Europe; Flaviviridae Infections; GB virus C; Hepatitis, Viral, Human; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Ritonavir; Serologic Tests; Treatment Outcome; United States

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NRTI) sparing is a favourable option for patients with NRTI failure or toxicity.. Patients judged to be failing NRTI therapy were enrolled in a single-arm, open-label study of indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/r) 800/100 mg twice a day (bid)+efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg once a day (qd). The primary endpoint was the change in time-weighted average HIV RNA from baseline. The initial 48-week protocol was extended to 96 weeks by a single amendment. Analysis was by intention to treat.. Sixty-one patients (23 female) were enrolled in the study. Baseline median inter-quartile range (IQR) NRTI exposure was 4.4 (3.9-4.7) years; baseline median viral load was 4.09 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (range 3.75-4.61 log(10) copies/mL); baseline median CD4 count was 169 cells/microL (range 60-277 cells/microL). The mean (SD) change in time-weighted average HIV RNA from baseline at 48 and 96 weeks was -2.1 (0.7) and -2.1 (0.8) log(10) copies/mL respectively, resulting in 87% and 69% of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL. Sixteen per cent of patients permanently ceased therapy and 26% underwent temporary drug interruptions because of study drug-related adverse events. Fasted-lipid values rose significantly over the 96 weeks of study, as did median blood glucose and median serum creatinine levels. Twelve (20%) patients underwent IDV dose reduction, mainly because of nephrotoxicity (nine of 12 patients). Blood pressure values deteriorated following switch, but markers of nucleoside toxicity improved.. IDV/r 800/100 mg bid+EFV 600 mg qd gave a potent, durable response in these NRTI failures and was reasonably well tolerated. However, we observed adverse effects on renal, metabolic and blood pressure parameters. Lower doses of boosted IDV might improve toxicity while maintaining efficacy, and this possibility warrants further investigation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Anthropometry; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Blood Glucose; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Creatinine; Cyclopropanes; Disease Progression; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The influence of saquinavir hard-gel capsules on lopinavir pharmacokinetic parameters was investigated using a population approach. Forty-nine patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and treated with lopinavir/ritonavir, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus saquinavir (group A), and 118 patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir plus nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (group B) were included in the study. No significant relationship was established between the presence or the daily dosage of saquinavir in the treatment and lopinavir population pharmacokinetic parameters. The values (mean+/-standard deviation) of the individual apparent clearance (5.0+/-1.8 vs. 5.0+/-3.2 L/h), volume of distribution (66.6+/-1.6 vs. 66.8+/-1.9 L), absorption rate constant (0.37+/-0.01 vs. 0.37+/-0.03 hours), and trough plasma concentration (5.5+/-2.3 vs. 5.3+/-1.9 mg/L) of lopinavir are not significantly different between groups A and B. This lack of influence of saquinavir on lopinavir pharmacokinetics makes the use of this combination in salvage therapy easier.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Bayes Theorem; Capsules; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gels; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Pyrimidinones; Regression Analysis; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

To describe plasma concentrations of indinavir alone or combined with ritonavir, and of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8, and to measure their variabilities in HIV-infected patients treated with a stable antiretroviral regimen and experiencing a sustained virological response for at least 12 months.. In this prospective trial, blood samples were drawn during a 6-hour time interval between two doses at enrolment to assess protease inhibitor (PI) pharmacokinetic parameters, and 4 months later to assess plasma trough and peak concentrations. Safety and adherence assessments and laboratory data were collected during an 8-month period. PI pharmacokinetic characteristics were analysed using a non-compartmental approach. Inter- and intrapatient variabilities were estimated using a linear mixed-effect model. The impact of different covariates on plasma trough concentrations was investigated. Eighty-eight patients were analysed: 42 treated with indinavir and 46 with nelfinavir.. The interquartile range (IQR) of the plasma trough concentration corrected for the sampling time (Ccalc) was 116-374 microg/L for indinavir alone and 163-508 microg/L for indinavir/ritonavir. Ritonavir significantly increased indinavir elimination half-life and plasma exposure. For nelfinavir, the IQR of Ccalc was 896-2059 microg/L for three-times-daily administration and 998-2124 microg/L for twice-daily administration. Variabilities were high for both PIs. Intrapatient variability for indinavir alone (and indinavir + ritonavir) was 76% (107%) and interpatient variability was 58% (10%) in adherent patients. Intrapatient variability for nelfinavir three times daily (and twice daily) was 41% (74%) and interpatient variability was 62% (50%). Intrapatient variability was lowered in patients with a high adherence level.. Although performed in a homogeneous population, this study documented a high interpatient but also intrapatient variability of indinavir and nelfinavir pharmacokinetics, which should be taken into account when interpreting therapeutic drug monitoring. Once patients have reached a sustained virological response, plasma PI monitoring may have a limited impact.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Nelfinavir; Patient Compliance; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Viral Load

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of indinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg plus stavudine and lamivudine twice daily in antiretroviral-therapy-naive Thai HIV-1-infected patients.. This was an open-label, non-randomized single arm study. Antiretroviral-naive patients (n=80) with CD4+ cell count < 200 x 10(6)/l were started on stavudine and lamivudine plus indinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily. CD4+ cell count and HIV RNA were determined at week 0, 12, 24, 48 and 96. HIV RNA was measured to a level of 50 copies/ml by RT-PCR assay. Primary analysis was statistically performed as intent to treat. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with plasma HIV RNA below 50 copies/ml at week 96.. Eighty antiretroviral-therapy-naive patients with median CD4+ cell count 19 x 10(6)/l (range: 2 - 197 x 10(6)/l) and median baseline plasma HIV RNA of 174,000 copies/ml (range 16,800-750,000 copies/ml) were enrolled. In the intent-to-treat analysis at week 96, the proportion of patients with HIV RNA of <50 copies/ml was 68.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.3-69.3), whereas it was 88.7% (95% CI: 88.1-89.3) in the on-treatment analysis at week 96. The regimen was well tolerated. Hyperglycaemia, hypercholesterolaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia were found in 8.3, 33.3 and 37.0% of the patients, respectively. Treatment was stopped in 18 patients; two from intolerance, two switched therapy, four as a result of serious adverse event-related death, and ten were lost to follow-up.. Our study demonstrates that indinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg plus stavudine and lamivudine twice daily, the least expensive boosted protease inhibitor, appears to be effective and safe up to 96 weeks despite high baseline viraemia and low CD4+ cell count in antiretroviral-naive patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hyperglycemia; Hypertriglyceridemia; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Stavudine; Thailand; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Withholding Treatment

Study M98-863 was a double-blind, randomized, phase 3 study that compared lopinavir/ritonavir with nelfinavir, each coadministered with stavudine and lamivudine, in 653 antiretroviral therapy-naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected subjects. The incidence of HIV drug resistance was analyzed using baseline and rebound virus isolates from subjects with plasma HIV RNA >400 copies/mL from weeks 24 to 108 of therapy. No evidence of genotypic or phenotypic resistance to lopinavir/ritonavir, defined as any active site or primary mutation in HIV protease, was detected in virus isolates from 51 lopinavir/ritonavir-treated subjects with available genotypes. Primary mutations related to nelfinavir resistance (D30N and/or L90M) were observed in 43 (45%) of 96 nelfinavir-treated subjects. Resistance to lamivudine and stavudine was also significantly higher in nelfinavir-treated versus lopinavir/ritonavir-treated subjects. These differences suggest substantially different genetic and pharmacological barriers to resistance for these 2 protease inhibitors and may have implications for strategies for initiating antiretroviral therapy.

Topics: Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Global Health; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Mutation; Nelfinavir; Patient Compliance; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Stavudine; Time Factors; Viral Load

The safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activity of lopinavir, a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor, coformulated with ritonavir as a pharmacokinetic enhancer were evaluated in 38 antiretroviral-naive patients randomized 1:1 to receive open-label lopinavir/ritonavir at a dose of 800/200 mg once daily or 400/100 mg twice daily, each in combination with stavudine and lamivudine twice daily, for 48 weeks. Over the course of 48 weeks, median predose concentrations of lopinavir exceeded the protein-binding corrected concentration required to inhibit replication of wild-type HIV by 50% in vitro by 40- and 84-fold in the once- and twice-daily groups, respectively. Predose concentrations of lopinavir were more variable in the once-daily group (mean +/- SD, 3.62+/-3.38 microg/mL for the once-daily group and 7.13+/-2.93 microg/mL for the twice-daily group). At week 48, in an intent-to-treat (missing = failure) analysis, 74% of patients in the once-daily group and 79% of patients in the twice-daily group had HIV RNA levels of <50 copies/mL (P=.70). Study drug-related discontinuations occurred in 1 patient in each treatment group. Genotypic resistance testing of 4 patients with HIV RNA levels >400 copies/mL between weeks 24 and 48 demonstrated no protease inhibitor-resistance mutations.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir

Rifampin is an important drug in the treatment of tuberculosis, but administration of rifampin in combination with protease inhibitors is complicated because of drug-drug interactions. A prospective, controlled, multiple-dose study involving 6 HIV-infected patients receiving a combination of indinavir (800 mg) and ritonavir (100 mg) twice a day was performed to evaluate whether the inducing effect of rifampin on the drug-metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 could be overcome by the inhibitory effect of ritonavir. Pharmacokinetic evaluations of steady-state concentrations of indinavir and ritonavir were performed before and after administration of rifampin (300 mg every day for 4 days). An 87% reduction (from 837 to 112 ng/mL) in median indinavir and a 94% reduction (from 431 to 27 ng/mL) in median ritonavir concentrations were seen 12 h after the last dose of rifampin was administered (P=.031). These results strongly indicate that the administration of rifampin with a combination of indinavir (800 mg) and ritonavir (100 mg) could lead to subtherapeutic concentrations of indinavir.

Topics: Adult; Antitubercular Agents; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Rifampin; Ritonavir

Most of the studies evaluating rash in HIV-positive patients have focused on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), particularly nevirapine, and little is known about the occurrence of rash and the risk factors for its development in patients receiving regimens not based on NNRTI.. We evaluated all cases of rash observed during a 48-week randomized multicentre trial in 1251 nucleoside-experienced patients who started treatment with protease inhibitors (ritonavir or indinavir) at CD4 counts below 50 cells/microL. Incidence rates for rash were calculated according to gender, clinical status, age, use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis and use of individual antiretroviral drugs at enrollment. Differences between groups defined according to the above characteristics were tested for statistical significance using the log-rank test in a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. All factors that gave results in the univariate analyses below the significance level of 0.05 were included in a multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model.. During a follow-up period of 9690 person-months, 66 patients (5.3%) developed rash (0.68 events/100 person-months). In the univariate analyses, risk of rash did not differ with trial treatment (indinavir or ritonavir), clinical status, PCP prophylaxis, or age. During follow-up, rash was observed in 7.5% of enrolled women and in 4.5% of enrolled men (P=0.03). Serious rash occurred in 4.5% of enrolled women and in 1.6% of enrolled men (P=0.003). Use of HAART (P<0.001) and inclusion of zidovudine and of zalcitabine in the prescribed regimen (P=0.02) appeared to be associated with a lower risk of rash. In the multivariate analysis, the variables that remained significantly predictive of rash were gender (risk for women compared to men: 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-2.72, P=0.048) and use of a non-HAART regimen (risk for non-HAART patients compared to HAART: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.49-5.02, P=0.001).. In our study, about 5% of HIV-positive patients who started treatment with protease inhibitors at very low CD4 counts developed rash, generally in the first few weeks after treatment. Risk was significantly higher in women and in patients who did not receive a HAART regimen. Our data indicate that women have a higher risk of rash than men, also with regimens that do not include NNRTI.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Eruptions; Exanthema; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Sex Factors; Viral Load

The physiologic changes that occur during pregnancy make it difficult to predict antiretroviral pharmacokinetics (PKs), but few data exist on the PKs of protease inhibitors in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women. The objective of the present study was to determine the PKs of ritonavir (RTV)-enhanced saquinavir (SQV) in HIV-infected pregnant women by an area under the curve (AUC)-targeted approach. A phase I, formal PK evaluation was conducted with HIV-infected pregnant woman during gestation, during labor and delivery, and at 6 weeks postpartum. The SQV-RTV regimen was 800/100 mg twice a day (b.i.d.), and nucleoside analogs were administered concomitantly. The SQV exposure targeted was an AUC at 24 h of 10,000 ng. h/ml. Participants were evaluated for 12-h steady-state PKs at each time period. Thirteen subjects completed the PK evaluations during gestation, 7 completed the PK evaluations at labor and delivery, and 12 completed the PK evaluations postpartum. The mean baseline weight was 67.4 kg, and the median length of gestation was 23.3 weeks. All subjects achieved SQV exposures in excess of the target AUC. The SQV AUCs at 12 h (AUC(12)s) during gestation (29,373 +/- 17,524 ng. h/ml [mean +/- standard deviation]), during labor and delivery (26,189 +/- 22,138 ng. h/ml), and during the postpartum period (35,376 +/- 26,379 ng. h/ml) were not significantly different. The mean values of the PK parameters for RTV were lower during gestation than during the postpartum period: for AUC(12), 7,811 and 13,127 ng. h/ml, respectively; for trough concentrations, 376 and 632 ng/ml, respectively; and for maximum concentrations, 1,256 and 2,252 ng/ml, respectively (P

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Delivery, Obstetric; Drug Combinations; Female; Half-Life; HIV Infections; Humans; Labor, Obstetric; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir

Most protease inhibitors available for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are highly bound to plasma proteins, mainly alpha-1 acid glycoprotein. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of total protease inhibitor (PI) concentrations has been increasing in the past few years; however, the pharmacological activity of the PIs is dependent on unbound drug entering cells harboring HIV. There is little information available on unbound drug concentrations of these drugs in vivo. The aim of the study was to measure unbound plasma concentrations of lopinavir (LPV) and to relate them to the total plasma concentrations to establish the unbound percentage in vivo during a full dosage interval. A pharmacokinetic study was performed in HIV-infected subjects (n = 23; median CD4 cell count = 290 x 10(6) cells x L(-1); viral load < 50 copies x mL(-1)) treated with a LPV/ritonavir (RTV)-containing regimen. Ultrafiltration was used to separate unbound LPV in all plasma samples (n = 115). Equilibrium dialysis was also used to compare with ultrafiltration measurements in 10/23 patients at baseline and 2 hours after drug intake. Total and unbound LPV concentrations were measured by a fully validated method using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Based on a comparison of AUC(unbound)AUC(total), the mean (+/- SD) unbound percentage of LPV from all the samples studied (n = 115) was 0.92% (+/- 0.22) when measured with ultrafiltration and 1.32% (+/- 0.44) when equilibrium dialysis was used (n = 20), showing a higher drug recovery (P = 0.048). The unbound percentage of LPV was found to be significantly higher after 2 h than at baseline (P < 0.05 with both methods), suggesting a concentration-dependent binding of LPV that has not been observed in vitro. However, the clinical significance of such phenomena is still unclear.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Blood Proteins; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Protein Binding; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Ultrafiltration

Coadministration of amprenavir (APV) with small doses of ritonavir (RTV) results in a significant increase in APV plasma concentrations. Viruses showing resistance to other protease inhibitors (PI) may remain susceptible to APV, supporting a role for this drug in salvage therapy. We enrolled 35 patients who began a rescue intervention based on APV/RTV 600/100 mg twice daily. Their median viral load before beginning APV/RTV was 4.15 logs and their median CD4 count was 247 cells per microliter. The median prior PI exposure was of 43 months. At baseline, the median number of PI resistance mutations was 7. A significant virologic response (VR) (>1 log drop in plasma HIV-RNA and/or to <50 copies per milliliter) was recorded in 21.7% (5/23) of treated patients at week 48 (14.3% in the intent-to-treat analysis). The VR was significantly more frequent among subjects with less than 5 PI resistance mutations (66.6% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.008). Patients with prior exposure to lopinavir showed VR significantly less frequently than those not exposed to that drug (11% versus 60%; p < 0.05). The mean APV plasma trough concentration at week 12 was 1.3 microg/mL, and did not differ significantly comparing subjects having or not having VR. A trend toward a higher VR rate at week 48 was noticed among subjects with high genotypic inhibitory quotients (GIQ). In summary, HIV genotyping but not drug levels might be helpful to predict which patients would benefit from a rescue intervention based on APV/RTV 600/100 twice daily.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Area Under Curve; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Furans; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Mutation; Patient Selection; Phenotype; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

AIDS Clinical Trials Group study 359 was a controlled study of saquinavir with either ritonavir or nelfinavir, together with delavirdine, adefovir, or both, in indinavir-experienced persons. Saquinavir was common in all study arms, and the study investigated relationships among characteristics of patients, saquinavir area under the curve (AUC) and trough concentrations (C(min)), and virologic response. Concentrations of saquinavir were higher when it was combined with ritonavir than when it was combined with nelfinavir and were lower with adefovir-containing regimens. Females had higher AUC and C(min) values than did males. Higher saquinavir AUC and C(min) values were associated with a greater likelihood of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA levels

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Delavirdine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nelfinavir; Organophosphonates; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Sex Factors

To determine whether an association existed between lopinavir (LPV) plasma concentrations and changes in body fat composition.. A prospective, non-randomized study.. HIV clinic of a University Hospital.. HIV-infected subjects who had virological failure on protease inhibitor-containing regimens. Twenty-two consecutive patients were enrolled, 19 completed 24 weeks of treatment and 16 completed the full 48-week study period.. Patients were treated with LPV/ritonavir (LPV/r) in combination with other antiretroviral agents. LPV trough plasma concentrations were measured at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48. Body fat composition was quantified by computerized tomographic scanning at baseline, and weeks 24 and 48.. LPV trough concentrations correlated with absolute and proportional changes in limb fat from baseline to week 48. Significant differences were found in mean LPV trough concentrations between patients losing less than 5% of limb fat, those experiencing a limb fat loss between 5 and 20%, and those losing more than 20% at week 24 [mean (SD), 4.67 (1.67); 8.57 (1.77); 9.49 (2.67) microg/ml, respectively; P=0.013] and week 48 [mean (SD), 4.5 (2.24); 7.04 (1.77); 9.7 (2.8) microg/ml, respectively; P=0.027]. Most patients losing more than 5% of limb fat during LPV/r therapy had mean LPV trough concentrations > or = 8 microg/ml.. In patients receiving salvage therapy with LPV/r there was an association between LPV plasma trough concentrations and limb fat loss. The risk of peripheral limb fat loss may be greater among patients achieving higher LPV trough concentrations.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Within this open-label, uncontrolled prospective trial we evaluated safety, efficacy and development of genotypic resistance under the new protease inhibitor lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in antiretroviral (ARV) HIV patients.. 58 patients with virological failure under their current ARV therapy were started on a LPV/r containing regimen. Median baseline HIV RNA and CD4 count were 4.6 log(10) cps/ml (range 2.1-6.4) and 128 x 10(6)/l (0-767), respectively. CD4 count, HIV RNA and metabolic parameters were assessed at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48. Genotypic resistance testing was performed at baseline and again at weeks 12, 24 and 48 in the event of virological failure.. Until week 48, viral load (VL) decreased by a median of 1.9 log(10) cps/ml (-0.8-3.8). A VL below 80 cps/ml was found in 20/58 patients (34.5%) at week 48. In parallel, CD4 cells increased to a median of 332 x 10(6)/l (8-905). Nine patients discontinued study treatment. At 48 weeks, median triglyceride and cholesterol levels increased significantly. While the median number of overall protease mutations at baseline was four in all patients, it was six in patients virologically failing on LPV/r. The average number of mutations increased significantly to eight at week 48. Several mutations were detected considerably more often in the event of failure than in response to treatment, e. g. at amino acid positions 10, 24, 54, 71, 82, 84.. LPV/r is effective in heavily pretreated patients. Discontinuation due to adverse events is infrequent. No individual mutation can be associated with failure on LPV/r. However, a greater number of protease mutations at baseline is associated with poorer treatment outcome and several mutations seem to be related to treatment failure.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Pharmacogenetics; Probability; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Risk Assessment; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

This pharmacokinetic study was designed to characterize interactions between amprenavir and the lopinavir-ritonavir combination in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus in whom previous antiretroviral therapy had failed.. Twenty-seven patients included in a randomized clinical trial (ANRS [National Agency for AIDS Research] Protocol 104) participated in this study. They were randomized to receive ritonavir at a dose of either 100 mg twice daily or 200 mg twice daily. For the first 2 weeks of therapy, they were randomly assigned to receive lopinavir (400 mg twice daily) and ritonavir (100 mg twice daily), amprenavir (600 mg twice daily) plus ritonavir (100 mg twice daily), lopinavir (400 mg twice daily) and ritonavir (100 mg twice daily) plus additional ritonavir (100 mg twice daily), or amprenavir (600 mg twice daily) plus ritonavir (200 mg twice daily). From week 3 onward, all patients received amprenavir plus lopinavir-ritonavir with or without an additional ritonavir dose (100 mg twice daily). The pharmacokinetics of the 3 drugs was studied in weeks 2 and 6 of therapy.. Median amprenavir concentrations decreased by 54% (P =.004) when lopinavir was added to the amprenavir-ritonavir regimen. Lopinavir weakly displaced amprenavir from plasma proteins: The average unbound fraction of amprenavir was 0.089 in week 2 and 0.114 in week 6 (P =.03), but this did not fully account for the observed interaction. Increasing the ritonavir dose did not affect the amprenavir concentration. The relationship between lopinavir and ritonavir concentrations fitted a maximum effect (E(max)) model;the average concentration of ritonavir that yielded a lopinavir concentration of 8119 ng/mL (50% of E(max)) was 602 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, 22%). There was a significant relationship between the lopinavir inhibitory quotient and the virologic response in week 2 (P =.005).. Lopinavir markedly decreases the amprenavir concentration during amprenavir and lopinavir-ritonavir combination therapy. The inhibitory quotients were more predictive of the short-term virologic response than was the level of drug exposure.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Biological Availability; Carbamates; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Furans; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Probability; Pyrimidinones; Risk Assessment; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Severity of Illness Index; Single-Blind Method; Statistics, Nonparametric; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Combination antiretroviral therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) has been highly effective in clinical trials. Results of long-term therapy with LPV/r-based regimens have not been previously reported. This study describes the 4-year (204-week) safety and antiretroviral activity of LPV/r-based treatment in antiretroviral-naive individuals.. Long-term, open-label follow-up of a phase II, prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.. A group of 100 antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients were randomized to one of three blinded doses of LPV/r [200/100 mg (n = 16), 400/100 mg (n = 51), or 400/200 mg (n = 33)] with stavudine 40 mg and lamivudine 150 mg every 12 hours. After 48 weeks, LPV/r was dosed open-label at 400/100 mg every 12 hours with stavudine and lamivudine.. : Mean baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell count were 4.9 log10 copies/ml and 338 x 10 cells/l, respectively. At week 204, 72 patients remained on study, 70 of whom had HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml (70% by intent-to-treat analysis). Twenty-eight patients discontinued therapy prior to week 204 because of adverse events (n = 10), lost to follow-up (n = 9), or other reasons (n = 9). Of 15 patients who met protocol-defined criteria for virologic failure, seven remained on the study regimen and their HIV-1 RNA was re-suppressed to < 50 copies/ml at week 204. Genotypic analysis of rebound viral isolates was available from 10 patients, including all eight patients who discontinued the study prematurely. No isolate demonstrated primary or active site mutations in protease. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal symptoms and lipid elevations.. LPV/r-based therapy provides durable antiretroviral response and is generally well tolerated through 204 weeks of therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Stavudine; Time Factors

To investigate the emergence of resistance to GW433908 (908), a protease inhibitor (PI) with demonstrated antiviral efficacy, safety and tolerability, when administered once daily (q.d.) with low dose ritonavir (908/r).. A 48-week Phase III open-label study (SOLO, APV30002) in which antiretroviral therapy-naive patients (n = 649) were treated with 908/r, (1400 mg/200 mg, q.d.) or nelfinavir [1250 mg, twice daily (b.i.d.)] with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), abacavir (300 mg, b.i.d.) and lamivudine (150 mg, b.i.d.).. Viral genotype and phenotype were analysed at baseline and on treatment up to 48 weeks and beyond.. Emergence of genotypic resistance was significantly different between the 908/r q.d. and the nelfinavir b.i.d. treatment arms for both PIs (0 versus 50%; P < 0.001) and the NRTI (13% versus 69%; P < 0.001) received. In the nelfinavir arm the key protease mutations D30N and/or L90M were frequently observed. The absence of protease resistance mutations and reduced incidence of NRTI resistance mutations in the 908/r q.d. arm was confirmed by phenotyping, which showed a lack of PI cross-resistance.. The absence of resistance to 908 or cross-resistance to other PIs, and reduced NRTI resistance, following a 908/r q.d. regimen supports the use of this boosted PI early in therapy.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Carbamates; Drug Resistance; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Drug Resistance, Viral; Follow-Up Studies; Furans; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Mutation; Organophosphates; Phenotype; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

The safety, efficacy, and mutual interactions of combination amprenavir with lopinavir/ritonavir as deep salvage treatment were investigated in a prospective 24-week pilot study. HIV-infected patients (n = 22) with virologic failure to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-NRTIs, and at least 2 protease inhibitors received 400/100 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir with 600 mg of amprenavir every 12 hours combined with NRTIs. Patients receiving the same doses of lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 10) or amprenavir with ritonavir (n = 8) were chosen as controls for pharmacokinetic analyses. Mean changes from baseline HIV RNA levels and CD4 counts after 24 weeks were -1.13 log10 copies/mL and +88 x 10 cells/L, respectively. The mean plasma trough concentration (Cmin)and peak concentration (Cmax) of amprenavir were 104% and 228% lower and the Cmin of lopinavir was 46% lower in patients in whom the drugs were coadministered than in controls. There were 4 permanent drug discontinuations because of toxicity. An inhibitory quotient (IQ) of amprenavir higher than 0.8 was the best predictor of virologic outcome at 24 weeks, even after adjusting for amprenavir Cmin or phenotypic susceptibility. Deep salvage therapy using lopinavir/ritonavir with amprenavir is sufficiently safe and shows partial efficacy. When these drugs are coadministered, therapeutic drug monitoring should be employed and the IQ can be used to determine target drug levels.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides

Tipranavir (TPV), a novel nonpeptidic protease inhibitor (NPPI), was administered to treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients over 14 days in a randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a self-emulsifying drug delivery system (SEDDS) formulation, in combination with ritonavir (RTV). Of the 31 patients enrolled, 10 were randomized to receive TPV 1200 mg twice daily (TPV 1200), 10 patients received TPV 300 mg + RTV 200 mg twice daily (TPV/r 300/200), and 11 patients received TPV 1200 mg + RTV 200 mg twice daily (TPV/r 1200/200). The median baseline viral load and CD4 cell count were 4.96 log10 copies/mL and 244 cells/mm, respectively. After 14 days, the median decrease in viral load was -0.77 log10 in the TPV 1200 group, -1.43 log10 in the TPV/r 300/200 group, and -1.64 log10 in the TPV/r 1200/200 group. TPV exposure was increased by 24- and 70-fold in the TPV/r 300/200 and 1200/200 groups, respectively, compared with TPV 1200 alone. There were no significant differences across treatment arms with regard to drug-related adverse events. TPV/r appeared to be safe, effective, and well tolerated during 14 days of treatment.

Topics: CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Pyridines; Pyrones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides

To evaluate and describe the parameters and characteristics of different drug regimens in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).. Randomized, open-label, multicenter study.. Pediatric HIV research clinics in the United States and Puerto Rico.. Twenty-one HIV-infected children, aged 3-14 years, who were clinically stable and treated with the same antiretroviral therapy for 16 weeks or longer.. In step 1, children were randomized to receive one of three treatment regimens: zidovudine plus lamivudine, ritonavir plus zidovudine and lamivudine, or ritonavir plus stavudine. Patients originally assigned to the zidovudine plus lamivudine group in step 1 were eligible to progress to step 2 if their HIV RNA values at week 12, 24, or 36 were 10,000 copies/ml or greater but 100,000 copies/ml or less. In step 2 they received a regimen of ritonavir plus stavudine and nevirapine.. Seven children were randomized to each of the three treatment regimens. Concentrations of the agents were quantitated at steady state after observed doses, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. Nevirapine concentrations were not determined. One child was excluded from analysis because pharmacokinetic parameters could not be estimated. Ritonavir oral clearance was slower in the pooled cohort of children who received stavudine compared with zidovudine and lamivudine. Stavudine oral clearance was marginally faster when combined with ritonavir and nevirapine compared with only ritonavir.. Therapy for HIV is complex, and pharmacodynamic data indicate that relationships exist between systemic concentrations of antiretroviral drugs and virologic response. Careful drug interaction studies have not been conducted for all treatment regimens, and it will not be surprising if unexpected interactions are found. Pharmacokinetic studies to address these considerations should be viewed as a fundamental component of antiretroviral drug development, as they represent a tool to improve pharmacotherapy for HIV-infected children.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Half-Life; HIV Infections; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Ritonavir; Stavudine; Zidovudine

This was a prospective pilot study evaluating a saquinavir (SQV) soft-gel capsules (SGC)/ritonavir (RTV)-containing once-daily regimen over a follow-up of 3 months. The primary end-point was to determine the number of patients both remaining on treatment at month 3 and with trough SQV plasma concentration 24 h after the last intake (C24h) exceeding the inhibition of 95% of viral replication in vitro (IC95). The secondary end-points were to investigate the immuno-virological efficacy and safety of SQV-SGC/RTV once daily, and to explore SQV concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Twenty-three antiretroviral-naive and 17 protease inhibitors (PIs) experienced HIV-1-infected patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA level below 200 copies/ml were enrolled. They were assigned to SQV-SGC/RTV (1600/100 mg once daily) combined with nucleoside and/or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. In a subgroup of 13 patients, both plasma and intracellular SQV concentrations were determined. By intent to treat analysis the percentage of success at month 3 was 87.5% (confidence interval: 73.2-95.8%) with 78.3% in naive and 100% in PI-experienced patients. SQV C24h and intracellular concentrations [median (range, n)] were 241 ng/ml (40-1209, 35) and 323 ng/ml (168-475, 12), respectively. Intracellular concentrations showed an accumulation of SQV in PBMCs persisting during 24 h. Neither immunological nor virological failure was observed. Clinical and biological tolerance was acceptable in all patients but three with adverse effects leading to discontinuation. These data confirmed the short-term efficacy of SQV-SGC/RTV once-daily regimen based on SQV therapeutic drug monitoring.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Capsules; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gels; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

We studied a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing regimen for the treatment of children infected with NRTI-resistant HIV-1. The combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and efavirenz suppressed HIV-1 levels for a prolonged period and resulted in a significant increase in CD4+ T cell numbers despite an extensive prior treatment with NRTI (>4 years). Observed side effects were transient with the exception of dyslipidaemia.

Topics: Adolescent; Alkynes; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Child; Child, Preschool; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Oxazines; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

The aim of the present study was to assess the pharmacokinetic behavior of atazanavir-ritonavir when it is coadministered with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Eleven patients enrolled in Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le SIDA (National Agency for AIDS Research, Paris, France) trial 107 were included in this pharmacokinetic study. They received atazanavir at 300 mg and ritonavir at 100 mg once a day (QD) from day 1 to the end of study. For the first 2 weeks, their nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) treatments remained unchanged. Tenofovir DF was administered QD from day 15 to the end of the study. Ongoing NRTIs were selected according to the reverse transcriptase genotype of the HIV isolates from each patient. The values of the pharmacokinetic parameters for atazanavir and ritonavir were measured before (day 14 [week 2]) and after (day 42 [week 6]) initiation of tenofovir DF and are reported for the 10 patients who completed the study. There was a significant decrease in the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)) for atazanavir with the addition of tenofovir DF (AUC(0-24) ratio, 0.75; 90% confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.97; P = 0.05). There was a trend for a decrease in the minimum concentrations of atazanavir and ritonavir in plasma when they were combined with tenofovir, but none of the differences reached statistical significance. The median decreases in the HIV RNA loads at week 2 and week 6 were 0.1 and 0.2 log copies/ml, respectively. In summary, our data are consistent with the existence of a significant interaction between atazanavir and tenofovir DF.

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiviral Agents; Area Under Curve; Atazanavir Sulfate; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Organophosphonates; Organophosphorus Compounds; Pyridines; Ritonavir; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; Tenofovir

To compare the steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety of saquinavir soft-gelatin capsules (SGC) plus low-dose ritonavir administered once/day in antiretroviral-naive adult patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and to evaluate any sex-related differences.. Single-center, open-label, pharmacokinetic study.. University-affiliated outpatient HIV clinic.. Six men and seven women with HIV-1.. Each patient received saquinavir SGC 1600 mg and ritonavir 100 mg for a 14-day course of therapy. Nine serial blood samples during 24 hours were collected on day 14 of therapy. Plasma saquinavir and ritonavir concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Standard noncompartmental methods were used to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters. The unpaired Student t test was used for the statistical comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters between male and female patients. Once-daily saquinavir SGC plus ritonavir was generally well tolerated. Pharmacokinetic data from five men and five women were evaluable. The median saquinavir area under the concentration-time curve from 0-24 hours (AUC0-24) in the female patients (82,300 ng x hr/ml) was significantly (p=0.036) higher than that in the male patients (47,400 ng x hr/ml). This relationship remained significant for weight-adjusted saquinavir AUC0-24 values. Ritonavir's apparent oral clearance in the women was significantly (p=0.023) lower than that in the men.. Significantly higher plasma concentrations of saquinavir were achieved in female compared with male HIV-infected patients receiving once-daily saquinavir SGC 1600 mg plus ritonavir 100 mg.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Capsules; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Half-Life; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sex Characteristics

To compare CC chemokine mRNA levels from native peripheral blood mononucleated cells (PBMCs) before and 6 months after the initiation of two different regimens of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), we treated group 1 (n = 11) with two nucleoside analogues and the protease inhibitor (PI) indinavir boosted by ritonavir (800/100 mg b.i.d.); group 2 (n = 8) was treated with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) efavirenz instead of PI. CC chemokine mRNA levels (regulated upon T cell activation expressed secreted [RANTES], macrophage inhibitory protein [MIP]-1alpha, MIP-1beta, monocyte chemotactic protein [MCP]-1, MCP-2) were quantified from PBMCs before and 6 months after the initiation of HAART using a reverse transcription/real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. The mRNA levels of MCP-1 and MCP-2 were significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.05), while MIP-1alpha and MIP-1beta were decreased significantly only in the PI-treated group, but not in the NNRTI group. A moderate decrease of RANTES was observed in both treatment groups. The data suggest that HAART regimens containing either NNRTI or PI are not equivalent with regard to modification of CC chemokine mRNA profiles.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Chemokine CCL2; Chemokine CCL3; Chemokine CCL4; Chemokine CCL5; Chemokine CCL8; Chemokines; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Macrophage Inflammatory Proteins; Male; Middle Aged; Monocyte Chemoattractant Proteins; Oxazines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Ritonavir; RNA, Messenger

Enfuvirtide (Fuzeon) is an HIV fusion inhibitor, the first drug in a new class of antiretrovirals. The HIV protease inhibitors ritonavir and saquinavir both inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoenzymes, and low-dose ritonavir is often used to boost pharmacokinetic exposure to full-dose protease inhibitors. These two studies were designed to assess whether ritonavir and ritonavir-boosted saquinavir influence the steady-state pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide. Both studies were single-center, open-label, one-sequence crossover clinical pharmacology studies in 12 HIV-1-infected patients each. Patients received enfuvirtide (90 mg twice daily [bid], subcutaneous injection) for 7 days and either ritonavir (200 mg bid, ritonavir study, orally) or saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg bid, saquinavir/ritonavir study, orally) for 4 days on days 4 to 7. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the morning dose of enfuvirtide on days 3 and 7. Plasma concentrations for enfuvirtide, enfuvirtide metabolite, saquinavir, and ritonavir were measured using validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methods. Efficacy and safety were also monitored. Bioequivalence criteria require the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the least squares means (LSM) of C(max) and AUC(12h) to be between 80% and 125%. In the present studies, analysis of variance showed that when coadministered with ritonavir, the ratio of LSM for enfuvirtide was 124% for C(max) (90% confidence interval [CI]: 109%-141%), 122% for AUC(12h) (90% CI: 108%-137%), and 114% for C(trough) (90% CI: 102%-128%). Although the bioequivalence criteria were not met, the increase in enfuvirtide exposure was small (< 25%) and not clinically relevant. When administered with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir, the ratio of LSM for enfuvirtide was 107% for C(max) (90% CI: 94.3%-121%) and 114% for AUC(12h) (90% CI: 105%-124%), which therefore met bioequivalence criteria, and 126% for C(trough) (90% CI: 117%-135%). The pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide are affected to a small extent when coadministered with ritonavir at a dose of 200 mg bid but not when coadministered with a saquinavir-ritonavir combination (1000/100 mg bid). However, previous clinical studies have shown that such increases in enfuvirtide exposure are not clinically relevant. Thus, no dosage adjustments are warranted when enfuvirtide is coadministered with low-dose ritonavir or saquinavir boosted with a low dose of ritonavir.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; Female; Half-Life; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Peptide Fragments; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (SQV/r) is currently licensed as a twice-daily regimen. Reducing the pill burden with once-daily dosing may improve adherence. Intracellular concentrations of drugs must be related to the clinical efficacy of protease inhibitors. The aims of the study were to determine the cellular and plasma saquinavir and ritonavir concentrations, to determine the half-lives (t(1/2)s) of the drugs in each compartment, and to examine relationships between drug accumulation and lymphocyte subset P glycoprotein (P-gp) expression. Venous blood samples from 12 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving a hard-gel formulation of SQV/r (1,600/100 mg once daily) were collected at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after dosing. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were separated by density gradient centrifugation, and P-gp expression was measured by dual-color flow cytometry. Plasma and intracellular (cell-associated) drug concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The ratio of the intracellular drug area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24 h)) to plasma drug AUC(0-24 h) was calculated to determine cellular drug accumulation. The median (range) AUC(0-24 h) of saquinavir in plasma was 16.2 (5.7 to 39.3) mg. h. liter(-1), and that in cells was 46.3 (24.7 to 114.6) mg. h. liter(-1). Corresponding ritonavir values were 7.5 (1.5 to 14.6) mg. h. liter(-1) and 10.4 (3.2 to 13.7) mg. h. liter(-1), respectively. The median accumulation ratios of cellular AUC to plasma AUC for saquinavir and ritonavir were 3.31 (range, 1.49 to 6.69) and 1.46 (range, 0.83 to 4.15), respectively. Significant differences between the plasma and intracellular saquinavir t(1/2)s (4.5 h [range, 2.5 to 9.3 h] and 5.9 h [range, 4.0 to 17.7 h]; P = 0.034) and between the plasma and intracellular ritonavir t(1/2)s (4.1 h [range, 2.6 to 8.3 h] and 6.2 h [range, 3.9 to 18.6 h]; P = 0.032) were observed. No relationship was observed between the accumulation of saquinavir or ritonavir and lymphocyte subset P-gp expression. The intracellular t(1/2)s of saquinavir and ritonavir were longer than the plasma t(1/2)s, indicating that intracellular drug may be available at a time when concentrations in plasma are below the minimum effective concentration.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Combinations; Female; Flow Cytometry; Half-Life; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lymphocyte Subsets; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

Baseline CD4 cell counts and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 RNA levels have been shown to predict immunologic and virologic responses in HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy. In our randomized, double-blind, comparative trial, 653 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients received lopinavir/ritonavir or nelfinavir, plus stavudine and lamivudine, for up to 96 weeks. The risk of loss of virologic response was significantly higher for nelfinavir-treated patients than for lopinavir/ritonavir-treated patients (Cox model hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-3.0; P<.001). For nelfinavir-treated patients, but not for lopinavir/ritonavir-treated patients, higher baseline HIV-1 RNA levels and lower baseline CD4 cell counts were associated with a higher risk of loss of virologic response.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Male; Nelfinavir; Predictive Value of Tests; Pyrimidinones; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sex Characteristics; Stavudine; Viral Load

The aim of this study was to quantify the change in saquinavir and amprenavir exposure when combined and used with low-dose ritonavir; to evaluate 24-week safety and immunologic and virologic response. It was a randomized, nonblinded, prospective study. There were 11 HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral-experienced, male and female subjects > or = 18 years old, median HIV-1 RNA and CD4(+) T-cell count of 4.86 log copies/mL and 10(6) cells/mm(3), respectively. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive saquinavir 1000 mg/ritonavir 100 mg every 12 hours or amprenavir 600 mg/ritonavir 100 mg every 12 hours for 7 days. After 12-hour pharmacokinetic sampling, the third protease inhibitor (PI) was added, and pharmacokinetics sampling was repeated 14 days later. Subsequent PI dosage adjustments were based on real-time pharmacokinetic assessment. Saquinavir did not affect amprenavir or ritonavir pharmacokinetics. Amprenavir decreased area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12h)) and C(12h) for saquinavir 82 and 61%, and 74 and 75% for ritonavir. An adjusted PI regimen of amprenavir 600 mg/saquinavir 1400 mg/ritonavir 200 mg every 12 hours returned saquinavir exposure to baseline. At 24 weeks, HIV RNA declined a median of 1.55 log copies/mL and CD4(+) T-cell counts increased a median of 52 cells/mm(3). Gastrointestinal events predominated and were mild to moderate. These data suggest that amprenavir/saquinavir/ritonavir may be a viable salvage regimen in heavily PI-experienced individuals. New formulations of amprenavir and saquinavir may simplify this regimen.

Topics: Adult; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Saquinavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

To compare the safety and efficacy of amprenavir [APV/j Agenerase trade mark; GlaxoSmithKline, [Ware, UK; 600 mg twice a day (bid)] boosted with low-dose ritonavir (RTV, 100 mg bid) with those of other protease inhibitors (PIs) in PI-experienced HIV-infected patients.. Parallel-group, randomized, open-label, multicentre study.. One hundred and sixty-three patients with HIV predicted to be sensitive to APV, another PI and a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) were randomly assigned to receive either APV boosted with low-dose RTV (APV/r) or a standard of care (SOC) PI with or without low-dose RTV. The non-inferiority of APV/r to the SOC PIs was assessed by time-weighted average change from baseline (AAUCMB) in plasma viral load (vRNA) at week 16.. The antiviral response for APV/r bid was non-inferior to that for the SOC PI group: the vRNA AAUCMB mean treatment difference was 0.043 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/mL [95% confidence interval (CI)-0.250, 0.335]. APV/r bid was generally well tolerated.. Results confirm the antiviral activity, short-term safety and tolerability of APV/r bid in PI-experienced patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; Female; Furans; Genes, Viral; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

To compare the magnitude and durability of the antiviral response to fosamprenavir (FPV) plus ritonavir (RTV) once-daily (FPV/r QD) with nelfinavir twice-daily (NFV BID), each administered with abacavir and lamivudine twice-daily.. An international, phase III, randomized, open-label study in antiretroviral therapy-naive, HIV-infected adults.. Patients with advanced HIV disease received FPV/r QD (n = 322) or NFV BID (n = 327). At week 48, 69% of patients in the FPV/r QD group and 68% in the NFV BID group had plasma HIV-1 RNA (vRNA) < 400 copies/ml, whereas 55% of patients in the FPV/r QD group and 53% in the NFV BID group had vRNA < 50 copies/ml (intent to treat, rebound/discontinuation = failure). More patients in the NFV BID group (17%) experienced virological failure than in the FPV/r QD group (7%). Efficacy of FPV/r QD was maintained in patients with CD4+ cell counts < 50 x 10 cells/l or vRNA >/= 100 000 copies/ml at entry. At week 48, median CD4+ cell counts were increased to 203 x 10 cells/l (FPV/r QD group) and 207 x 10 cells/l (NFV BID group). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. Diarrhea was more common on NFV BID than on FPV/r QD (16 versus 9%; P = 0.008). Fasting lipid profile results were generally favorable in both treatment arms. FPV/r QD maintained plasma amprenavir (APV) trough concentrations above the mean phenotypic drug-susceptibility (IC50) for wild-type virus for APV.. As a first choice protease inhibitor with a low daily pill burden, FPV/r QD was well tolerated and provided potent, durable antiviral suppression.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Carbamates; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nelfinavir; Organophosphates; Patient Compliance; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) is a CYP3A4 inhibitor and substrate; it also may induce cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isozymes. Phenytoin (PHT) is a CYP3A4 inducer and CYP2C9/CYP2C19 substrate. This study quantified the pharmacokinetic (PK) drug interaction between LPV/RTV and PHT. Open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, PK study in healthy volunteers. Subjects in arm A (n = 12) received LPV/RTV 400/100 mg twice daily (BID) (days 1-10), followed by LPV/RTV 400/100 mg BID + PHT 300 mg once daily (QD) (days 11-22). Arm B (n = 12) received PHT 300 mg QD (days 1-11), followed by PHT 300 mg QD + LPV/RTV 400/100 mg BID (days 12-23). Plasma samples were collected on day 11 and day 22; PK parameters were compared by geometric mean ratio (GMR, day 22:day 11). P values <0.05 were considered significant. Following PHT addition, LPV area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-12h) decreased from 70.9 +/-37.0 to 49.6 +/- 25.1 microg.h/mL (GMR 0.67, P = 0.011) and C0h decreased from 6.0 +/- 3.2 to 3.6 +/- 2.3 microg/mL (GMR 0.54, P = 0.001). Following LPV/RTV addition, PHT AUC0-24h decreased from 191.0+/-89.2 to 147.8+/-104.5 microg.h/mL (GMR 0.69, P = 0.009) and C0h decreased from 7.0+/-4.0 to 5.3+/-4.1 microg/mL (GMR 0.66, P = 0.033). Concomitant LPV/RTV and PHT use results in a 2-way drug interaction. Phenytoin appears to increase LPV clearance via CYP3A4 induction, which is not offset by the presence of low-dose RTV. LPV/RTV may increase PHT clearance via CYP2C9 induction. Management should be individualized to each patient; dosage or medication adjustments may be necessary.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pharmacogenetics; Phenytoin; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Seizures

A pharmacokinetic comparison of three dosing regimens of saquinavir/ritonavir was carried out: 1600/100 mg once-daily with 1000/100 mg twice-daily, and 1600/100 mg once-daily with 2000/100 mg once-daily.. Twenty patients on saquinavir hard gel caps/ritonavir 1600/100 mg once-daily in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for at least 4 weeks were enrolled and randomized to either saquinavir hard gel caps/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice-daily or 2000/100 mg once-daily. Two pharmacokinetic curves were plotted, at baseline (day 0) and 7 days after the switch. Plasma concentrations were measured at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 (and 24 for once-daily dosing) hours after drug intake by validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay (HPLC). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-24 or AUC0-12), maximum and minimum concentration (Cmax and Cmin) and elimination half-life were calculated using a non-compartmental model.. Compared with saquinavir/ritonavir 1600/100 mg once-daily dosing, the saquinavir AUC and Cmin improved significantly when dosed as 1000/100 mg twice-daily (53% and 299%, respectively), and as 2000/100 mg once-daily (71% and 65%, respectively). Low Cmin in three subjects at baseline was corrected after switch to the other dosages. Saquinavir/ritonavir 2000/100 mg once-daily was also associated with a significant increase in saquinavir Cmax (52%) compared with saquinavir/ritonavir 1600/100 mg once-daily.. Saquinavir/ritonavir when dosed as 2000/100 mg once-daily or 1000/100 mg twice-daily achieves higher saquinavir plasma levels compared with saquinavir/ritonavir 1600/100 mg once-daily. Taking the convenience of once-daily dosing into consideration, dosage of 2000/100 mg once-daily may be preferred.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Capsules; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Gels; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

The pharmacokinetics, antiviral activity, and safety of an amprenavir-ritonavir (APV-RTV) 600/100 mg b.i.d. regimen and an APV-RTV 1200/200 mg q.d. regimen were studied in a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected population. The geometric least-square mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of steady-state trough concentrations, compared with that of the amprenavir 1200 mg b.i.d. regimen, was 6.08 (4.94-7.49) for the twice-daily APV-RTV regimen, and it was 4.19 (2.90-6.08) for the daily APV-RTV regimen. The regimens were well tolerated, which supports APV-RTV as an option for twice-daily or daily therapy for HIV.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Carbamates; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

To investigate the normalized inhibitory quotient (NIQ) of lopinavir (LPV) as a predictor of 48-week virological responses to a lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV)-containing regimen in highly treatment-experienced patients.. We calculated the NIQ for 59 patients who completed 48 weeks' treatment and assessed the factors predicting a week-48 virological response.. The NIQ was calculated by dividing each subject's IQ (LPV Ctrough/fold change in LPV susceptibility, as assessed by VirtualPhenotype) by a reference IQ (mean population LPV Ctrough/fold change in LPV IC50, as assessed by VirtualPhenotype). HIV-1 RNA was assessed by NASBA (quantification limit: 80 copies/ml). The general linear model and multiple logistic regression, respectively, were used to estimate the independent predictors of a change in viral load and HIV-1 RNA <80 copies/ml.. The median (interquartile range) baseline levels of CD4+ cells and HIV-1 RNA were 251 (141-385) cells/microl and 4.85 (4.49-5.23) log10 copies/ml, respectively. The median NIQ was 2.2 (0.5-14). At week 48, the median decrease in HIV-1 RNA was 1.4 (0.59-2.79) log10 copies/ml (P<0.0001), with 24 subjects (41%) reaching <80 copies/mi. Baseline HIV-1 RNA (P=0.001), CD4+ cells (P=0.002) and NIQ (P=0.0006) independently predicted the week-48 change in viral load, whereas baseline CD4+ cells (P=0.011) and NIQ (P=0.009) independently predicted a week-48 HIV-1 RNA level of <80 copies/ml.. The LPV NIQ independently predicts virological responses to an LPV/RTV-containing regimen in highly treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients.

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Multivariate Analysis; Phenotype; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Viral Load

To compare the antiviral efficacy of a salvage therapy combining lopinavir and amprenavir with 200 mg/d or 400 mg/d ritonavir, together with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, over a 26-week period in HIV-infected patients in whom multiple antiretroviral regimens had failed.. Phase IIb, randomized, open-label, multicentre trial. Patients were eligible if they had <500 CD4+ cells/mm3 and >4 log10 copies/ml HIV-RNA after treatment with at least two protease inhibitors (PIs) and one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor.. At baseline (n=37), the median CD4+ cell count was 207/mm3 and the median plasma HIV-1 RNA level was 4.7 log10 copies/ml; the median number of PI mutations was seven and the median decrease in phenotypic susceptibility to lopinavir and amprenavir was 9.7 and 2.6, respectively. The mean number of antiretrovirals received prior to randomization was 7.7. The fall in the median HIV-1 RNA level at week 26 was -1.4 log10 copies/ml in the 200 mg/d ritonavir group and -2.5 log10 copies/ml in the 400 mg/d group (P=0.02). Viral load fell below 50 copies/ml in 32% and 61% of patients, respectively (P=0.07). After adjustment for the ritonavir dose, a smaller number of PI mutations was the only baseline characteristic associated with a better virological response at week 26. Amprenavir concentrations were significantly lower in presence of lopinavir. The lopinavir inhibitory quotient at week 6 correlated weakly with the change in the HIV-RNA level at week 26.. Combination of amprenavir, lopinavir and 400 mg/d ritonavir shows significant virological efficacy without increased toxicity in HIV-infected patients in whom multiple antiretroviral regimens have failed.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Carbamates; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; France; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Salvage Therapy; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

Pharmacokinetic enhancement of protease inhibitors (PIs) with low-dose ritonavir (RTV) for salvage therapy is increasingly common. The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of indinavir (IDV)/RTV at 800/200 mg (arm A) and 400/400 mg (arm B) administered twice daily in HIV-infected subjects failing their first PI-based regimen.. A phase I/II, randomized, open-label, 24-week study was conducted. Formal 12-hour pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed, and study visits occurred at baseline; at weeks 1, 2, and 4; and every 4 week thereafter for 24 weeks. Clinical symptoms and laboratory assessments were collected. Subjects were allowed to switch arms because of toxicity.. Forty-four subjects were enrolled (22 per arm). IDV predose concentration, maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve were significantly higher in arm A. Fifty-five percent and 45% of subjects in arms A and B responded (<200 copies/mL at week 24; P = 0.76), respectively. CD4 cell responses were similar. All subjects had IDV-sensitive virus at baseline and at virologic failure. Tolerability was comparable, but all grade 3 or higher triglyceride increases occurred in arm B and more subjects in arm B switched because of toxicity (5 vs. 1 triglyceride increases).. This is the largest formal pharmacokinetic evaluation of 2 dosage combinations of IDV/RTV in HIV-infected individuals. Pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with previous results in patients but lower than in seronegative controls. Both regimens exhibited similar tolerability and response rates. High toxicity with a low response suggests that the optimum IDV/RTV combination would include an RTV dose <400 mg and an IDV dose <800 mg in this population.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ethnicity; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Viral Load

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients on nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors with HIV RNA at <1,000 copies/ml were randomized in an open-label study to administration of combined indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/RTV) at 667/100 mg every 12 h (q12h) or IDV alone at 800 mg q8h to determine the regimens' pharmacokinetics. On day 14, plasma IDV and RTV levels were determined over 24 h. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetics (minimum concentration of drug in serum [C(min)], area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC(0-24)], and maximum concentration of drug in serum [C(max)]) were expressed as geometric mean values with 90% confidence intervals (CI). The primary hypothesis was that the lower bound of the protocol-specified 90% CI for the geometric mean C(min) ratio of the combination compared to IDV alone regimen would be >/=2. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, and 24 (15 male; average age, 42 years) completed the study. The C(min), AUC(0-24), and C(max) for IDV/RTV compared to IDV alone were 1,511 versus 250 nM, 119,557 versus 77,034 nM . h, and 10,428 versus 10,407 nM, respectively. Corresponding relationships for IDV/RTV compared to IDV alone were a 6.0-fold increase in C(min) (90% CI, 4.0, 9.3), an increase in AUC(0-24) (1.5-fold, 90% CI, 1.2, 2.0), and no increase in C(max). Adverse events were similar and generally mild, with no cases of nephrolithiasis. The geometric mean ratio of IDV C(min) for IDV/RTV compared to IDV was at least 2 by a lower bound of the 90% CI, satisfying the primary hypothesis. The C(max) was not increased, suggesting an IDV/RTV 667/100-mg toxicity profile may be similar to that of unboosted IDV.

Topics: Area Under Curve; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endpoint Determination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Ritonavir

Management of treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus patients has become complex, and therapy may need to include two protease inhibitors at therapeutic doses. The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics in serum of saquinavir (1,000 mg twice daily [b.i.d.]), lopinavir (400 mg b.i.d.), and ritonavir (100 mg b.i.d.) in a multidrug rescue therapy study and to investigate whether steady-state pharmacokinetics of lopinavir-ritonavir are affected by coadministration of saquinavir. Forty patients were included (25 given ritonavir, lopinavir, and saquinavir and 15 given ritonavir and lopinavir). The median pharmacokinetic parameters of lopinavir were as follows: area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)), 85.1 microg/ml . h; maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), 10.0 microg/ml; trough concentration of drug in serum (C(trough)), 7.3 microg/ml; and minimum concentration of drug in serum (C(min)), 5.5 microg/ml. Lopinavir concentrations were similar in patients with and without saquinavir. The median pharmacokinetic parameters for saquinavir were as follows: AUC(0-12), 22.9 microg/ml . h; C(max), 2.9 microg/ml; C(trough), 1.6 microg/ml; and C(min), 1.4 microg/ml. There was a strong linear correlation between lopinavir and ritonavir and between saquinavir and ritonavir concentrations in plasma. The correlation between lopinavir and saquinavir levels was weaker. We found higher saquinavir concentrations in women than in men, with no difference in lopinavir levels. Only patients with very high body weight presented lopinavir and saquinavir concentrations lower than the overall group. Ritonavir has a double-boosting function for both lopinavir and saquinavir, and in terms of pharmacokinetics, the drug doses selected seemed appropriate for combining these agents in a dual protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimen for patients with several prior virologic failures.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Body Weight; Capsules; Drug Therapy, Combination; Excipients; Female; Gelatin; Hepatitis, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sex Characteristics; Treatment Failure; Viral Load

We assessed the pharmacokinetics of three different doses of indinavir in five patients. All doses achieved trough concentrations above efficacy thresholds. Toxic trough concentrations were observed in all patients receiving 800 mg, in two patients receiving 600 mg, and in none receiving 400 mg. Indinavir at 400 mg may be efficacious and less toxic in patients taking ritonavir and efavirenz.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Benzoxazines; China; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Ritonavir

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cholesterol; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyslipidemias; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Lopinavir; Pyrimidinones; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Viral Load

To study the control of viral replication in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children on different salvage therapies.. A retrospective observational study in 120 HIV-infected children was conducted. The children were divided into 3 groups according to their salvage therapies: (1) children receiving first line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART); (2) protease inhibitor-experienced children receiving second line HAART; (3) protease inhibitor-experienced children receiving HAART including lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r). The outcome variables examined were time to achieve viral load (VL) < or =400 copies/mL, success in achieving VL < or =400 copies/mL and time to virologic failure (VL >400 copies/mL).. VL (HIV-RNA copies/mL) was quantified with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction molecular assay. For each protocol, survival analyses were conducted to determine the probability of achieving VL < or =400 copies/mL and rebound of VL.. VL < or =400 copies/mL was achieved by 52.4% of children receiving first line HAART, 48.3% receiving second line HAART and 71.5% receiving HAART including LPV/r. Children receiving HAART including LPV/r reached VL < or =400 copies/mL in a shorter time than children receiving second line HAART (P = 0.017), but quite similar to children receiving first line HAART. In terms of adjusted relative risk, children receiving HAART including LPV/r were 3.36 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.59, 7.07] more likely to achieve VL < or =400 copies/mL than children receiving a different second line HAART. VL rebound occurred in 68.2% children receiving first line HAART, 73.4% receiving second line HAART and 32.4% receiving HAART including LPV/r. Children receiving HAART that includes LPV/r has less incidence of VL rebound (P=0.013) and 3.29 (95% CI 1.04, 10.3) times less risk to achieve a VL rebound than children receiving a different second line HAART.. HAART that includes LPV/r is able to control HIV replication more efficiently than other classic salvage antiretroviral therapies.

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Child; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genes, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Mutation; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Viral Load

To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) changes in patients treated with indinavir three-times daily after switching to a twice-daily indinavir/ritonavir regimen or continuing with the same regimen.. Patients on HAART including indinavir three-times-daily with undetectable viral load were randomly assigned to continue with this therapy or to change to a twice-daily indinavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) regimen. The Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) questionnaire was used as the HRQoL measure.. A total of 118 patients participated in the study, of which 59 (50%) were randomly assigned to continue with the three-times-daily regimen. Patients had a mean age of 39 years and 80% of them were male. At baseline, subjects included in the three-times-daily group presented a significantly greater number of symptoms than subjects in the twice-daily group, but no statistically significant differences were observed in MOS-HIV scores between the groups. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, a reduction in HRQoL scores was observed in both groups, which was greater in the twice-daily group. In the per protocol analysis, reduction of HRQoL was minimal.. A HRQoL deterioration, greater in the twice-daily group, was observed in this study in the ITT analysis, while HRQoL remained stable in both groups in patients who continued with and tolerated the allocated regimen.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Quality of Life; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Adenine; Adult; Capsules; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gels; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Organophosphonates; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Tenofovir

Our objective was to study the effect of lopinavir/ritonavir on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) viral load as part of an antiretroviral combination treatment for HIV-1 infected individuals, and to determine the steady-state concentrations of lopinavir in CSF in relationship to plasma concentrations. Paired CSF and plasma samples from 12 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1 infected patients starting combination therapy containing lopinavir/ritonavir were collected at baseline, and during treatment at a first follow-up at median 3.0 months (range 2.6-6.0 months), and at a second follow-up at median 12.1 months (range 6.0-16.5 months). Levels of HIV-1 RNA, CD4+ T-cell count, beta2-microglobulin, neopterin, and lopinavir concentration were analysed. In addition, CSF and plasma lopinavir concentrations in 4 patients already on combination therapy including lopinavir/ritonavir were analysed. Nine of 11 patients had undetectable viral load in CSF and 5/11 in plasma at the first follow-up. At the second follow-up 7/7 had undetectable viral load in CSF and 9/9 in plasma. Intrathecal immunoactivation, measured by neopterin and beta2-microglobulin, decreased significantly both in CSF and serum. The total CSF concentrations of lopinavir were of the same order of magnitude as the unbound concentrations in plasma. Lopinavir mean (+/-SD) concentrations were 42.1 (+/-31.5) nM in CSF and 52.7 (+/-25.2) nM unbound in plasma. We found that antiretroviral combination therapy including lopinavir/ritonavir substantially decreases the viral load, both in CSF and plasma, as well as the intrathecal immunoactivation, measured by beta2-microglobulin and neopterin. CSF concentrations of lopinavir were low, but probably sufficient to have a virological effect.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Neopterin; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

The protease inhibitor (PI) ritonavir is used as a strong inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4, which boosts the activities of coadministered PIs, resulting in augmented plasma PI levels, simplification of the dosage regimen, and better efficacy against resistant viruses. The objectives of the present open-label, multiple-dose study were to determine the steady-state pharmacokinetics of amprenavir administered at 600 mg twice daily (BID) and ritonavir administered at 100 mg BID in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected adults treated with different antiretroviral combinations including or not including a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). Nineteen patients completed the study. The steady-state mean minimum plasma amprenavir concentration (C(min,ss)) was 1.92 microg/ml for patients who received amprenavir and ritonavir without an NNRTI and 1.36 microg/ml for patients who received amprenavir and ritonavir plus efavirenz. For patients who received amprenavir-ritonavir without an NNRTI, the steady-state mean peak plasma amprenavir concentration (C(max,ss)) was 7.12 microg/ml, the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 10 h (AUC(0-10)) was 32.06 microg. h/ml, and the area under the concentration-time curve over a dosing interval (12 h) at steady-state (AUC(ss)) was 35.74 microg. h/ml. Decreases in the mean values of C(min,ss) (29%), C(max,ss) (42%), AUC(0-10) (42%), and AUC(ss) (40%) for amprenavir occurred when efavirenz was coadministered with amprenavir-ritonavir. No unexpected side effects were observed. As expected, coadministration of amprenavir with ritonavir resulted in an amprenavir C(min,ss) markedly higher than those previously reported for the marketed dose of amprenavir. When amprenavir-ritonavir was coadministered with efavirenz, amprenavir-ritonavir maintained a mean amprenavir C(min,ss) above the mean 50% inhibitory concentration of amprenavir previously determined for both wild-type HIV-1 isolates and HIV-1 strains isolated from PI-experienced patients. These data support the use of low-dose ritonavir to enhance the level of exposure to amprenavir and increase the efficacy of amprenavir.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Area Under Curve; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; Half-Life; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Oxazines; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

The steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two oral doses of lopinavir-ritonavir (lopinavir/r; 400/100 and 533/133 mg) twice daily (BID) when dosed in combination with efavirenz, plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, were assessed in a phase II, open-label, randomized, parallel arm study in 57 multiple protease inhibitor-experienced but non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects. All subjects began dosing of lopinavir/r at 400/100 mg BID; subjects in one arm increased the lopinavir/r dose to 533/133 mg BID on day 14. When codosed with efavirenz, the lopinavir/r 400/100 mg BID regimen resulted in lower lopinavir concentrations in plasma, particularly C(min), than were observed in previous studies of lopinavir/r administered without efavirenz. Increasing the lopinavir/r dose to 533/133 mg increased the lopinavir area under the concentration-time curve over a 12-h dosing interval (AUC(12)), C(predose), and C(min) by 46, 70, and 141%, respectively. The increase in lopinavir C(max) (33%,) did not reach statistical significance. Ritonavir AUC(12), C(max), C(predose), and C(min) values were increased 46 to 63%. The lopinavir predose concentrations achieved with the 533/133-mg BID dose were similar to those observed with lopinavir/r 400/100 mg BID in the absence of efavirenz. Results from univariate logistic regression analyses identified lopinavir and efavirenz inhibitory quotient (IQ) parameters, as well as the baseline lopinavir phenotypic susceptibility, as predictors of antiviral response (HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml at week 24); however, no lopinavir or efavirenz concentration parameter was identified as a predictor. Multiple stepwise logistic regressions confirmed the significance of the IQ parameters, as well as other baseline characteristics, in predicting virologic response at 24 weeks in this patient population.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Area Under Curve; Benzoxazines; Biological Availability; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Reverse Transcriptase; Humans; Logistic Models; Lopinavir; Oxazines; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir

Forty-nine protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced but amprenavir (APV)-naïve patients experiencing virological failure were treated with ritonavir (RTV) (100 mg twice a day [b.i.d.]) plus APV (600 mg b.i.d.). Patients responded to therapy with a median viral load decrease of -1.32 log(10) by week 12. The addition of low-dose RTV enhanced the minimal APV concentration in plasma (APV C(min)) up to 10-fold compared with that obtained with APV (1,200 mg b.i.d.) without RTV. Baseline PI resistance mutations (L10F/I/V, K20M/R, E35D, R41K, I54V, L63P, V82A/F/T/S, I84V) identified by univariate analysis and included in a genotypic score and APV C(min) at week 8 were predictive of the virological response at week 12. The response to APV plus RTV was significantly reduced in patients with six or more of the resistance mutations among the ones defined above. The genotypic inhibitory quotient, calculated as the ratio of the APV C(min) to the number of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease mutations, was a better predictor than the virological or pharmacological variables used alone. This genotypic inhibitory quotient could be used in therapeutic drug monitoring to define the concentrations in plasma needed to control replication of viruses with different levels of PI resistance, as measured by the number of PI resistance mutations.

Topics: Adult; Carbamates; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose boosted indinavir (IDV)/ritonavir (RTV) regimen [100 mg RTV/400 mg IDV twice daily (bid)] in patients previously receiving a standard IDV regimen [800 mg three times a day (tid)].. In a prospective, open-label, cross-over trial, patients with plasma HIV RNA < 200 copies/ml receiving an IDV-containing regimen (800 mg tid) were switched to an RTV/IDV (100/400 mg bid)-containing regimen. Minimal and maximal IDV plasma concentrations ( Cmin and Cmax ) were determined before the switch (day 0), at week 2 and week 4 after the switch. The CD4 cell count and plasma HIV RNA were determined at day 0, week 2 and week 4, then every 8 weeks. The primary end-point was the percentage of patients with plasma HIV RNA below 200 copies ml at week 48.. Twenty patients were enrolled. At baseline, on IDV 800 mg tid, median IDV Cmin was 194 ng/ml and median IDV Cmax was 8449 ng/ml. On RTV/IDV (100/400 mg), median IDV Cmin increased to 536 ng/ml at week 2 and 475 ng/ml at week 4, while Cmax decreased to 2983 ng/ml at week 2 and 2997 ng/ml at week 4 ( P < 0.001). The median area under the IDV plasma concentration-time curve measured in seven patients was 25 126 ng.h/ml, and the IDV half-life (t1/2 ) was 4.4 h. All patients had plasma HIV RNA remaining < 200 copies/ml at week 48. Tolerability of RTV/IDV was excellent.. RTV/IDV (100/400 mg bid) yields significantly higher IDV plasma Cmin and lower IDV Cmax values relative to the standard IDV regimen, thereby improving both tolerability and efficacy.

Topics: Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Protease Inhibitors; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Treatment Failure

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Oxazines; Prospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Viral Load

Treatment failure after preceding protease inhibitors (PI) is often due to resistance mutations. Our objective was to evaluate amprenavir (APV) in pre-treated patients and to correlate it with pre-existing mutations. - Fourty five patients were entered in an open label prospective study (6/99-12/2000). Pre-treatment was 6.2 years +/- 2.4 (2-11.3) and included a mean of 4.13 nucleosides (RTIs) and 2.73 PIs. Genotypic resistance testing was performed prior to the switch. APV dose was 1200 mg/d in combination with ritonavir (RTV) boosting (2 x 100mg) and 2 x 1200 mg/d in 6 patients without RTV. Co-medication was selected based on treatment history and results of genotypic testing. - The median duration of treatment at analysis was 34 weeks. Plasma viral load (VL) average at baseline was 4.6 log subset 10 +/- 08. After 24 weeks the mean VL reduction was 1.4 log subset 10 +/- 1.2 3.86-0.40s). A VL reduction of >1.5 log subset 10 was found in 16/45 patients (36%), 21/45 (47%) patients achieved a VL <400 cp/ml, and 12/45 (27%) a VL < 50 cp/ml. CD4 cells increased from a mean baseline of 208/microl +/- 185 to 318/microl +/- 253. Fourty percent (18/45) of patients had a CD4 gain of more than 100 cells/microl. Genotypic resistance determination showed PI mutations in 87% of patients tested. The average number of mutated codons was 4.54. Three of 4 patients with I84V mutation did not achieve an undetectable VL. - Our findings demonstrate that APV and APV/RTV plus two additional antiretrovirals has a good virological and immunological success rate in pre-treated patients. Presence of more than two APV resistance mutations was associated with treatment failure.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Furans; Genotype; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Mutation; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Viremia

Low dose-ritonavir boosted protease inhibitors are increasingly being used for the first-line antiretroviral treatment, though their virological efficacy has just poorly been compared to alternative antiretroviral therapies. Here, we retrospectively investigated the virological responses of 316 protease inhibitor-naive HIV patients receiving highly active antiretroviral treatment based on a single (n = 256) or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (n = 60), both in the background of two nucleoside analogues. - By intent-to-treat analysis, a complete initial virological response was achieved in 71.8% of all patients in the single protease inhibitor group (indinavir: 76%, ritonavir: 67.5%, nelfinavir: 70.6%) and in 88.3% (p = 0.008) of patients treated with a boosted protease inhibitor (saquinavir/r: 71.4%, indinavir/r: 92.1%, lopinavir/r: 86.6%). The multivariate risk analysis identified boosted PI treatment as an independent predictor of a complete virological response (OR = 2.8, p=0.02). Viral rebound after an initial complete virological response was observed in 28% and 17% (p = 0.06) of patients receiving a single or a dual protease inhibitor, respectively. The rate of durable viral suppression over 12 months was 44.5% and 56.7% (p = 0.09) in the respective study cohorts. Ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors therefore seem to induce a superior virological response rate and a higher degree of sustained virological suppression.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outpatients; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Viremia

Lopinavir/ritonavir has demonstrated antiviral activity in the HIV-infected adult.. The objective of this study was to investigate a liquid coformulation of lopinavir/ritonavir, in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors, in HIV-infected children.. One hundred antiretroviral (ARV)-naive and ARV-experienced, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive children between 6 months and 12 years of age participated in this Phase I/II, open label, multicenter trial. Subjects initially received either 230/57.5 mg/m(2) or 300/75 mg/m(2) lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily; ARV-naive subjects also received stavudine and lamivudine, whereas ARV-experienced subjects also received nevirapine and one or two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy were evaluated.. All subjects were escalated to the 300/75 mg/m(2) twice daily dose based on results from an interim pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation. The pharmacokinetics of lopinavir did not appear to be dependent on age when dosing was based on body surface area but were decreased on coadministration with nevirapine. Overall 79% of subjects had HIV RNA levels <400 copies/ml at Week 48 (intent-to-treat: missing = failure). Mean increases in absolute and relative (percent) CD4 counts from baseline to Week 48 were observed in both ARV-naive subjects (404 cells/mm(3); 10.3%) and ARV-experienced subjects (284 cells/mm(3); 5.9%). Only one subject prematurely discontinued the study because of a study drug-related adverse event.. The liquid coformulation of lopinavir/ritonavir demonstrated durable antiviral activity and was safe and well-tolerated after 48 weeks of treatment in HIV-infected children.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Biological Availability; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Child; Child, Preschool; Confidence Intervals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Lopinavir; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Multivariate Analysis; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

To investigate the pharmacokinetics of once-daily saquinavir (SQV) hard-gelatin capsule (HGC)/ritonavir (RTV), 1600/100 mg, compared with once-daily SQV soft-gelatin capsule (SGC)/RTV, 1600/100 mg.. We evaluated 13 randomly selected HIV-1-infected subjects taking once-daily SQV SGC/RTV, 1600/100 mg, plus dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in this pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy. Subjects took 1 week of SQV HGC/RTV and NRTIs, followed by steady-state SQV PK determinations. Subjects then changed to SQV SGC/RTV and NRTIs for 1 week, followed again by steady-state SQV PK determinations. Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), maximum concentration (C(max)), minimum concentration (C(min)), time to C(max), and elimination half-life were calculated.. There was no significant difference in AUC values between HGCs and SGCs, with a median (plus interquartile range [IQR]) of 50.0 (42.6-71.5) versus 35.5 (28.0-50.2) mg/L/h, respectively ( =.056). Intersubject variability resulted in 4 of 13 subjects on the SQV SGCs and 2 of 13 subjects on the SQV HGCs having a C(min) below the minimum effective concentration of 0.05 mg/L.. Once-daily SQV HGCs, 1600 mg, boosted with once-daily RTV, 100 mg, resulted in PK parameters that were similar to those observed with 1600 mg of SQV SGC/100 mg RTV once daily. Once-daily SQV HGC/RTV, 1600/100 mg, may be easier to use in developing countries and may increase access where drug costs can be less, the capsule size is smaller, and the need for refrigeration is lessened.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Area Under Curve; Capsules; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

The objective of this study was to investigate if sildenafil influences the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir. Five HIV-infected patients on steady-state nelfinavir-containing therapy were subject to pharmacokinetic sampling for nelfinavir concentration twice: without sildenafil and with sildenafil 25 mg as a single dose. There were no differences in the AUC, T(max), or C(max) of nelfinavir. In a similar design, two patients on indinavir and two patients on ritonavir combined with saquinavir were studied. In accordance with the literature, neither of these two treatments was affected. It is concluded that nelfinavir pharmacokinetics were unaffected by concomitant intake of a single dose of sildenafil.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Erectile Dysfunction; Half-Life; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nelfinavir; Piperazines; Purines; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Sildenafil Citrate; Sulfones; Vasodilator Agents

To compare continued indinavir (IDV) 8-hourly (q8h) with switching to indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/RTV) 12-hourly (q12h) in HIV-positive patients having suppressed viral load with IDV q8h plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI).. Multicentre, international, randomized, open-label study enrolling HIV-1 infected patients on IDV 800 mg q8h plus two NRTI with CD4 cell counts > or = 100 x 106/l and plasma HIV RNA < 500 copies/ml for > or = 3 months.. Patients were randomized to continue on the same regimen or to switch to IDV plus liquid RTV (IDV/RTV 800 mg/100 mg q12h). Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients remaining < 500 copies/ml at 48 weeks.. A total of 323 patients (IDV/RTV, 162; IDV, 161) were evaluable. At 48 weeks, the proportions of patients with plasma HIV RNA < 500 copies/ml were 93%, 88% and 58% in the IDV/RTV arm versus 92% (P = 1), 86% (P = 0.87) and 74% (P = 0.003) in the IDV arm using on-treatment (OT) and intent-to-treat (ITT) [switches included (ITT, S = I) and switches = failure (ITT, S = F)] analyses respectively. Mean increase in CD4 cell count was 88 x 106/cells/l (IDV/RTV arm) and 60 x 106 cells/l (IDV arm) (P = 0.08). More patients discontinued study medication due to adverse events in the IDV/RTV arm than in the IDV arm (P < 0.001).. Equivalence of continuing IDV q8h versus switching to IDV/RTV (liquid) q12h in suppressed stable patients was demonstrated by OT and ITT S = I analyses. However, the IDV q8h arm performed better when discontinuations were classified as failures. IDV/RTV q12h can be convenient and equally effective for patients able to tolerate it.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Despite the clinical benefits of combination antiviral therapy, whether maximal antiviral potency has been achieved with current drug combinations remains unclear. We studied the first phase of decay of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA in plasma, one early indicator of antiviral activity, after the administration of a novel combination of lopinavir/ritonavir, efavirenz, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and lamivudine and compared it with that observed in matched cohorts treated with alternative combination regimens. On the basis of these comparisons, we conclude that the relative potency of highly active antiretroviral therapy may be augmented by as much as 25%-30%. However, it is important to emphasize that further study is warranted to explore whether these early measurements of relative efficacy provide long-term virologic and clinical benefits. Nevertheless, we believe that optimal treatment regimens for HIV-1 have yet to be identified and that continued research to achieve this goal is warranted.

Topics: Adenine; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cohort Studies; Cyclopropanes; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Lopinavir; Organophosphonates; Organophosphorus Compounds; Oxazines; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome

To describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of indinavir with or without low-dose ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected Thai patients.. Thirty-six HIV-1-infected patients who participated in HIV-NAT 005 study gave informed consent to record a pharmacokinetic curve 4 weeks after starting a regimen containing either indinavir 800 mg every 8 h (n = 19) or indinavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100 mg every 12 h (n = 17). Indinavir plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-compartmental methods.. The median (interquartile range; IQR) body weight of the 36 patients (11 females and 25 males) was 60 (54-72) kg. Median and IQR values for indinavir AUC, Cmax and Cmin were 20.9 (13.1-27.0) mg x h/L, 8.1 (6.6-9.4) mg/L and 0.13 (0.09-0.27) mg/L, respectively, for indinavir 800 mg every 8 h, and 49.2 (42.5-60.4) mg x h/L, 10.6 (8.5-13.2) mg/L and 0.68 (0.43-0.77) mg/L, respectively, for indinavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100 mg every 12 h. These values are not largely different from values found in Caucasian patients, with the exception of relatively high peak levels of indinavir in Thai subjects. Cut-off values for optimal virological efficacy were an indinavir Cmin of 0.10 and 0.25 mg/L for the every 8 h and the every 12 h regimen, respectively; patients with an indinavir AUC greater than 30 (every 8 h regimen) or 60 (every 12 h regimen) mg x h/L were at increased risk of developing nephrotoxicity.. Indinavir pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in Thai HIV-1-infected patients are similar to those described in Caucasian patients, despite an overall lower body weight in this population

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Body Weight; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Interactions; Female; Half-Life; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Kidney Diseases; Male; Ritonavir; Thailand

Topics: AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir

Low-dose ritonavir (RTV) boosts plasma amprenavir (APV) exposure. Little has been published on the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of APV 600 mg/RTV 100 mg (APV600/RTV) twice daily (BID) compared to APV 1200 mg BID (APV1200).. ESS40011 was a 24-week, multicenter, open-label, clinical trial in which antiretroviral therapy-naïve and -experienced HIV-1-infected adults were randomized 3:1 to receive either APV600/RTV BID or APV1200 BID, in combination with > or = 2 non-protease inhibitor antiretroviral drugs. Non-inferiority of the APV600/RTV regimen to the APV1200 regimen was established if the 95% lower confidence limit for the difference in proportion of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL at week 24 with APV 600/RTV minus APV1200 was > or =-0.12. Late in the conduct of the trial, patients not yet completing 24 weeks of therapy were given the option of continuing treatment for an additional 24-week period.. 211 patients were randomized, 158 to APV600/RTV and 53 to APV1200. At week 24, APV600/RTV was similar to or better than APV1200 (HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL in 62% [73/118] vs 53% [20/38] of patients; intent-to-treat: observed analysis). In the APV600/RTV arm, significantly more patients achieved HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (48% [57/118] vs 29% [11/38] with APV1200, P = 0.04), and greater mean reduction from baseline in HIV-1 RNA was observed (-2.21 vs -1.59 log10 copies/mL, P = 0.028). The two treatment arms were similar with respect to mean overall change from baseline in CD4+ count, frequency of drug-related grade 1-4 adverse events, and frequency of discontinuing treatment due to adverse events (most commonly nausea, diarrhea, vomiting or fatigue; 7% vs 8%), although a lower proportion of patients in the APV600/RTV arm experienced drug-related oral/perioral paresthesia (2% vs 8%). Eleven (73%) of 15 patients who had HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL at week 24 and chose to continue study treatment maintained this level of virologic suppression at follow-up 24 weeks later.. APV600 RTV BID was similar to or better than APV1200 BID in virologic response. Virologic results in a small number of patients who continued treatment for 24 weeks post-study suggest that virologic suppression with APV600 RTV BID is durable.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Carbamates; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; Furans; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sulfonamides; Viral Load

To assess the safety, efficacy of atazanavir (400 and 600 mg)/saquinavir (1200 mg) once daily versus ritonavir/saquinavir (400 mg/400 mg) twice daily with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in highly active antiretroviral therapy failure.. Randomized, multinational, 48-week, pilot trial with antiretroviral-experienced patients having at least 1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml, 100 x 106 CD4 cells/l (75 x 106 cells/l without AIDS diagnosis) and virological response to a prior regimen. Efficacy was evaluated by HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell changes from baseline to 48 weeks.. Comparable efficacy across groups at 48 weeks: mean HIV-1 RNA decreases, 1.44, 1.19 and 1.66 log(10) copies/ml (P = NS) and comparable virological response (> 1.0 log(10) decrease HIV-1 RNA or HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/ml) was achieved in 41, 29 and 35% (P = NS); and mean CD4 cell increases, 109, 55 and 149 x 106 cells/l in atazanavir 400-mg, atazanavir 600-mg and ritonavir groups, respectively. There were fewer adverse event discontinuations in the atazanavir groups (9%, 11%) versus the ritonavir group (30%) and atazanavir lacked adverse effects on lipids. In the atazanavir 400-mg, atazanavir 600-mg and ritonavir groups the mean changes from baseline at 48 weeks in fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations were -0.6, -6.7 and 23.2%, respectively and in fasting triglyceride concentrations they were -4.8, -27.1 and 93.0%, respectively (P < 0.05, LDL cholesterol; P < 0.001, fasting triglyceride; atazanavir/saquinavir versus ritonavir/saquinavir).. In antiretroviral-experienced patients, once-daily atazanavir/saquinavir was safe and well tolerated, showing comparable efficacy to twice-daily ritonavir/saquinavir, both with two NRTIs. Small lipid changes from baseline with atazanavir/saquinavir were not clinically significant in comparison with the prompt, marked and sustained changes of a magnitude suggesting clinical relevance achieved in the ritonavir/saquinavir group.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lipids; Male; Oligopeptides; Pilot Projects; Protease Inhibitors; Pyridines; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Salvage Therapy; Saquinavir; Treatment Failure

Therapeutic control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in peripheral compartments does not assure control in the central nervous system. Inadequate drug penetration may provide a sanctuary from which resistant virus can emerge or allow development of psychomotor abnormalities. To characterize the effect of ritonavir on indinavir disposition into cerebrospinal fluid, seven HIV-infected adults underwent intensive sampling at steady-state while receiving twice-daily indinavir (800 mg) and ritonavir (100 mg). Serial cerebrospinal fluid and plasma samples were obtained at 10 time points from each subject. Free indinavir accounted for 98.6% of drug in cerebrospinal fluid and 55.9% in plasma. Mean cerebrospinal fluid C(max), C(min), and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) values for free indinavir were 735 nM, 280 nM, and 6502 nM h(-1), respectively, and the free levels exceeded 100 nM in every sample. The cerebrospinal fluid/plasma AUC(0-12) ratio for free indinavir was 17.5% +/- 6.4%. This ratio was remarkably similar to results obtained in a previous study in which subjects received indinavir without ritonavir, indicating that ritonavir did not have a substantial direct effect on the barrier to indinavir penetration into cerebrospinal fluid. Low-dose ritonavir increases cerebrospinal fluid indinavir concentrations substantially more than 800 mg of indinavir given thrice daily without concomitant ritonavir, despite a lower total daily indinavir dose.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Blood-Brain Barrier; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Stavudine

Two hundred and twelve HIV-positive patients who started a new protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral regimen between January 1998 and December 2000 in our tertiary care centre were prospectively followed-up during a 12-month study period, in order to assess the incidence of hyperlipidaemia and related clinical adverse events. At the end of 1-year follow-up, PI-containing antiretroviral treatment led to a statistically significant increase in serum triglyceride levels (P<0.005) and total and LDL-cholesterol levels (P<0.05). The overall incidence of hypertriglyceridaemia and hypercholesterolaemia was 38.2 and 25%, respectively. The incidence of increased serum triglyceride levels was significantly higher in patients treated with ritonavir (66.6%) or lopinavir/ritonavir (60.7%), compared with other PIs (P<0.04). Clinical adverse events possibly related to the hyperlipidaemia (such as cardiovascular diseases or acute pancreatitis) were not observed during the entire 12 months study period. In conformity with other previously published studies, the very high incidence of hyperlipidaemia during a PI-based therapy recognised in our work raises a big concern about its potential clinico-pathological consequences and the most convenient pharmacological management of these metabolic imbalances.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, LDL; Cohort Studies; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Lopinavir; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Triglycerides

To determine whether an association existed between lopinavir (LPV) plasma concentrations and changes in lipid levels.. A prospective, nonrandomized study.. HIV-infected subjects with virologic failure on protease inhibitor-containing regimens. Twenty-two consecutive patients were enrolled, 19 completed 24 weeks of treatment, and 16 completed the full 48-week study period. INTERVENTION Patients were treated with LPV/ritonavir (LPV/r) in combination with other antiretroviral agents. Subjects were evaluated at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48. LPV trough plasma concentrations and lipid levels were measured.. LPV trough concentrations were higher in patients experiencing grade 3 or higher lipid elevations (mean [SD]: 9.71 microg/mL (5.62) vs. 6.09 microg/mL (3.83); P = 0.002) and in those developing grade 2 or higher hypercholesterolemia (mean [SD]: 8.48 microg/mL [4.64] vs. 5.71 microg/mL [3.94]; P = 0.003). All patients developing grade 2 or higher cholesterol elevation had an LPV trough concentration at week 4 greater than 8 microg/mL. Significant positive correlations were found between LPV trough concentrations and changes in triglyceride and cholesterol levels.. In patients receiving salvage therapy with LPV/r, there is an association between LPV plasma concentrations and lipid changes. Patients achieving higher LPV trough concentrations may be at greater risk of experiencing dyslipidemia. Further investigations are warranted to support a direct cause and effect relationship.

Topics: Adult; Cholesterol; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Lipid Metabolism; Lipids; Lopinavir; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Time Factors; Triglycerides

We evaluated the virological outcome of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in 224 HIV-1-infected and protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients showing virological failure to a highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen and followed up for at least 3 months. At baseline, the median level of plasma viraemia was 4.61 log10 copies/ml (range 3-6.48) and the median CD4 cell count was 219 cells/mm3 (range 1-836). During a median follow-up of 272 days (range 92-635), we observed an increase in the number of CD4 cells (P=0.02) and a dramatic decrease in plasma viraemia levels (P=0.0001), which became undetectable in 122 patients (54.5%). The closely related predictive factors were baseline plasma viraemia levels and the number of mutations known to reduce susceptibility to LPV/RTV. Thirty-one patients (13.8%) discontinued LPV/RTV during the follow-up, and one AIDS event and three deaths were recorded. Of the 134 patients (59.8%) who underwent a baseline genotype resistance test, 22 (16.4%) had > or = 6 mutations known to reduce LPV/RTV susceptibility; plasma viraemia became undetectable in 76 patients (56.7%), only five of whom harboured > or = 6 mutations at baseline (P=0.0001). The independent predictive factors related to virological success were plasma viraemia levels and the number of mutations reducing susceptibility to LPV/RTV at baseline; each additional log10 copies/ml of HIV RNA reduced the probability of virological success by 34.0% and each extra mutation by 14.5%.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Mutation; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Salvage Therapy; Viremia

This trial assessed the rate of virological failure at 48 weeks in adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected patients assigned indinavir/ritonavir (Idv/Rtv; 800/100 mg 2 times daily) or saquinavir/ritonavir (Sqv/Rtv; 1000/100 mg 2 times daily) in an open-label, randomized (1:1), multicenter, phase 4 design. Three hundred six patients began the assigned treatment. At 48 weeks, virological failure was seen in 43 (27%) of 158 and 37 (25%) of 148 patients in the Idv/Rtv and Sqv/Rtv arms, respectively. The time to virological failure did not differ between study arms (P=.76). When switching from randomized treatment was counted as failure, this was seen in 78 of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 51 of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P=.009). A switch from the randomized treatment occurred in 64 (41%) of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 40 (27%) of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P=.013). Sixty-four percent of the switches occurred because of adverse events. A greater number of treatment-limiting adverse events were observed in the Idv/Rtv arm, relative to the Sqv/Rtv arm. In conclusion, Rtv-boosed Sqv and Idv were found to have comparable antiretroviral effects in the doses studied.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Treatment Outcome

Highly active antiretroviral therapy containing three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors has been somewhat successful, but the clinical efficacy is unclear.. Randomized, controlled, open-label trial of 180 antiretroviral drug-naive HIV-infected patients allocated to a regimen of abacavir, stavudine and didanosine (A/S/D, n = 60), ritonavir and saquinavir (R/S 400/400 mg twice daily; n = 60) or nelfinavir and nevirapine (N/N 1250/200 mg twice daily; n = 60); the latter two in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine. The primary endpoint was HIV plasma RNA < or = 20 copies/ml after 48 weeks.. At baseline, the median CD4 cell count was 161 x 106 cells/l (range, 0-920) and the HIV RNA was 5.0 log10 copies/ml (range, 2.7-6.7). At 48 weeks, 43% in the A/S/D arm had a HIV RNA < or = 20 copies/ml, compared with 69% in the N/N arm (P < 0.01) and 62% in the R/S arm (P < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, the A/S/D arm had an odds ratio of obtaining a viral load of < or = 20 copies/ml at week 48 of 0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10-0.59] versus N/N and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.33-0.83) versus R/S. The A/S/D arm had a particularly poor outcome in patients with higher viral load and AIDS at baseline: 63% had to discontinue A/S/D (any drug). Side effects were more frequent in the A/S/D arm and included neuropathy 27%, suspicion of hypersensitivity 12%, and increase in lactate accompanied by systemic symptoms 8%.. The A/S/D regimen had a low efficacy and a high frequency of adverse events and cannot be recommended.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Didanosine; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Lactates; Male; Middle Aged; Nelfinavir; Nervous System Diseases; Nevirapine; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Treatment Outcome

Enfuvirtide is a novel antiretroviral that blocks HIV-1 cell fusion and viral entry. This Phase II, controlled, open-label, randomized, multicentre dose-ranging trial explored the safety, antiviral activity and pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide, administered by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection, in 71 HIV-1-infected, protease inhibitor-experienced, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-naive adults for 48 weeks. Study participants were randomized to receive enfuvirtide at a deliverable dose of 45, 67.5 or 90 mg twice daily; the 45 mg twice daily dose required 2 injections/day, while the higher doses required 4 injections/day. A background oral antiretroviral (ARV) regimen of abacavir (300 mg twice daily), amprenavir (1200 mg twice daily), ritonavir (200 mg twice daily) and efavirenz (600 mg once daily) was provided with enfuvirtide. A control group received the background ARV regimen alone. All potential participants underwent an HIV genotype at screen to ensure a homogenous population and to exclude patients with evidence of genotypic resistance to NNRTIs. Overall, the tolerability of the combination of abacavir, amprenavir, ritonavir, efavirenz and enfuvirtide was generally comparable to control through 48 weeks. No enfuvirtide dose-dependent adverse events (AEs) were observed across treatment groups. Injection site reactions (ISRs) occurred at least once in 68.5% of the enfuvirtide-treated population, and most ISRs were mild to moderate in severity, with no apparent dose relationship. Excluding ISRs, the most common treatment-emergent AEs were nausea, diarrhoea, dizziness and fatigue; with no clinically significant differences in the incidence of AEs observed between the control and enfuvirtide groups. Each treatment group benefited from ARV therapy, with a trend of increasing antiviral and immunological activity associated with increasing enfuvirtide dose. At 48 weeks, the median HIV-1 RNA change from baseline for the ITT population was -2.24 log10 copies/ml for the combined enfuvirtide groups compared with -1.87 log10 copies/ml for the control group. In addition, 54.9% of patients in the enfuvirtide group achieved HIV-1 RNA < or = 400 copies/ml versus 36.8% of patients in the control group. These results indicate that enfuvirtide has a favourable safety profile and is a promising new antiviral agent for HIV-infected patients who have been on previously failing ARV regimens.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enfuvirtide; Female; Furans; HIV Envelope Protein gp41; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Peptide Fragments; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The objective of this study was to compare indinavir peak plasma (Cmax) values after administration of indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg on an empty stomach or with food. High indinavir Cmax values have been associated with indinavir-related nephrotoxicity.. This was an open-label, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, cross-over pharmacokinetic study performed at steady state. HIV-infected patients who had been using indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg twice daily for at least 4 weeks were randomized to take this combination with a light breakfast (two filled rolls and 130 ml of fluid) on a first study day, and without food on a second day, or in the reverse order. The pharmacokinetics of indinavir and ritonavir were assessed after plasma and urine sampling during 12 h.. Data for nine patients were evaluated. Administration of indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg on an empty stomach resulted in a higher indinavir Cmax [geometric mean (GM) ratio - fasting/fed and 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28 (1.08-1.52), P=0.01] and a trend to a shorter indinavir tmax (P=0.07) compared to administration with food. The mode of administration of indinavir/ritonavir did not affect plasma indinavir Cmax and AUC values, parameters that have been associated with the antiviral efficacy of indinavir, nor the urinary excretion of indinavir.. Administration of indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg on an empty stomach results in a higher indinavir Cmax compared to ingestion with a light meal. Stated the other way round, intake with a light meal reduces indinavir Cmax, which probably reflects a food-induced delay in the absorption of indinavir. It is recommended to administer indinavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg with food, as a possible means to prevent indinavir-related nephrotoxicity in patients who start or continue with this regimen.

Topics: Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Food; Food-Drug Interactions; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Kidney Diseases; Middle Aged; Ritonavir

Scheduled treatment interruptions are being evaluated in an effort to decrease costs and side effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). A schedule of 1 week on and 1 week off therapy offers the promise of 50% less drug exposure with continuously undetectable HIV RNA concentration.. In the Staccato study 600 patients on successful HAART were to be randomized to either continued therapy, CD4-guided therapy, or one week on, one week off therapy. A scheduled preliminary analysis evaluated effectiveness in the 1-week-on-1-week-off arm.. Of 36 evaluable patients, 19 (53%) had two successive HIV RNA concentrations > 500 copies/ml at the end of the week off therapy, and were classified as virological failure. Most of those who failed took didanosine, stavudine, saquinavir, and ritonavir (11 patients). In these patients, there was no evidence of mutations suggestive of drug resistance, and plasma saquinavir levels were within the expected range. Two of three patients failing on triple nucleotides had drug resistance mutations, but nonetheless responded to reintroduction of triple nucleotide therapy. One of two patients taking nevirapine, and one of eight taking efavirenz, also failed. Both had resistance mutations at the time of failure, but not at baseline.. The 1-week-on-1-week-off schedule, as tested in the Staccato study, showed an unacceptably high failure rate and was therefore terminated.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Didanosine; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Genes, Viral; Genotype; HIV Infections; Humans; Mutation; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Treatment Failure

To examine the relationship between levels of the T-cell regulatory cytokine interleukin-7 (IL-7) and CD4 cell counts during immune reconstitution and to assess its prognostic value in advanced HIV-1-infected patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir-based therapy.. Thirty-six HIV-1-infected adults who completed 48 weeks of follow-up visits were included in this prospective study. Patients having failed two or more antiretroviral therapy regimens were treated with lopinavir/ritonavir-based therapy. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine IL-7 plasma levels, flow cytometry was used to analyse cell surface antigens, and polymerase chain reaction was used to quantify plasma HIV-1.. Pretreatment IL-7 levels were elevated in all patients (mean 11.0 pg/mL) and were negatively correlated with CD4 cell counts and age (r=-0.59, P<0.001 and r=-0.57, P<0.001, respectively). During the course of treatment, IL-7 levels decreased by 34% while CD4 cell numbers progressively increased by 88%. Multivariate regression analysis showed that only pretreatment IL-7 levels predicted viral load at 48 weeks when controlling for baseline CD4 cell counts, viral load and patient demographics.. These findings are consistent with regulation of T-cell recovery by IL-7, and suggest that IL-7 measurements might be used to predict virological response.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Interleukin-7; Lopinavir; Lymphocyte Count; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; T-Lymphocytes; Viral Load

HIV protease inhibitors (PI) were licensed without a direct evidence of their relative efficacy.. 137 patients attending our clinics between November 1997 and March 1998, to whom treatment with a PI was recommended, were randomized to receive indinavir (IDV), saquinavir (SQV) or ritonavir (RTV). Main outcome variables were one-year mean changes in HIV-RNA plasma concentrations and CD4 cells counts and proportion of patients with HIV viral load below level of detection.. Mean HIV viral load reductions were 0.95 for SQV, 0.72 for IDV and 0.65 for RTV (p = 0.44), equaling losses and changes to failures. In a standard intent-to-treat analysis, mean changes in viral load were 1.16, 1.01 and 1.50 (p = 0.21), respectively. The proportion of patients with undetectable viral load was 50%, with no differences between treatment arms.. No differences were observed in the effectiveness of SQV, IDV and RTV.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Viral Load

Human CD4+ T cells express P-glycoprotein (P-gp), the ATP binding cassette efflux transporter encoded by MDR1. A common MDR1 single-nucleotide polymorphism in exon 26 (C3435T), which is linked to an exon 21 polymorphism (G2677T/A) and reportedly alters expression, has been associated with greater CD4+ T-cell increases during antiretroviral therapy. P-gp overexpression prevents apoptosis and inhibits HIV-1 replication in model systems, suggesting a potential effect on T-cell turnover. This study explored relationships between MDR1 polymorphisms and phase 1 viral decay among 31 HIV-infected individuals initiating antiretroviral therapy. Position 3435 genotypes were CC in 7 (23%), CT in 14 (45%), and TT in 10 (32%). Position 2677 genotypes were GG in 8 (26%), GT in 18 (58%), and TT in 5 (16%). There was no significant relationship between allelic variants in either exon 26 or 21 and phase 1 or phase 2 viral decay, changes in lymphocyte subsets over time, or plasma trough ritonavir concentrations. It is concluded with 95% confidence that phase 1 viral decay differences between exon 26 TT and CC groups are unlikely to exceed 18%.

Topics: Adult; Alleles; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genes, MDR; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Zidovudine

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of indinavir 400 mg and ritonavir 400 mg twice daily (RIT/IND 400/400) in HIV-1-infected individuals, using an open label, proof of concept study. All patients received indinavir 400 mg and ritonavir 400 mg twice daily. Patients were followed up to 48 weeks. Nineteen subjects were enrolled, 11 (58%) men and eight (42%) women. The majority were American Black (nine; 47%) or Haitian (eight; 42%). The median baseline plasma HIV-1 viral load (VL) was 5.13 log10 copies/mL and the median CD4 cell count was 112 cells/mm(3). The proportion of compliant patients with VL <400 copies/mL at week 24 was 60% compared with 0% for non-compliant patients (P=0.011 [intent-to-treat] or P=0.085 [on-treatment]). VL at week 4 predicted week 24 VL response. Compliant patients had a median average CD4 cell count increase of 83.2 cells/mm(3) compared with 42.0 cells/mm(3) for non-compliant patients (P=0.010). The median average changes in triglycerides and cholesterol were significantly higher in compliant patients. This is a potent, safe combination for the treatment of HIV-1. VL at week 4 is predictive of viral outcome at week 24. Fasting serum cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly elevated during the study.

Topics: Black People; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Haiti; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Indinavir; Logistic Models; Male; Patient Compliance; Pilot Projects; Predictive Value of Tests; Ritonavir; United States; Urban Population; Viral Load

There is an increased interest in developing once-daily regimens for the treatment of HIV-infected patients. A Phase II study was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics, and short-term safety and efficacy of an indinavir/ritonavir combination as part of a once-daily regimen.. HIV-infected patients with either proven poor compliance to HAART regimens in the past or an anticipated poor compliance to such a regimen in the future were eligible for this study. They received a once-daily regimen consisting of indinavir 1200 mg, ritonavir 400 mg, and one or two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), also administered once daily with food. A 24 h pharmacokinetic profile was constructed in a subset of patients. Short-term safety and efficacy were evaluated at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after initiation of treatment.. A total of 64 patients were included in this study, of whom 27 (42.2%) were treatment-naive. The geometric mean (+95% CI) of indinavir AUC0-24h, Cmax and Cmin as determined in an unselected group of 16 patients were 84.9 (69.7-103.5) mg/l x h, 12.0 (10.2-14.1) mg/l and 0.15 (0.09-0.26) mg/l, respectively. A large interpatient variability was observed, with five out of the 16 subjects having a Cmin value below the minimum effective concentration of 0.10 mg/l. During the 24 weeks of follow-up nine patients (14.1%) discontinued study medication, two due to medication-related toxicity. Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported most frequently (50.0%), followed by skin effects (45.3%), joint pain (9.4%) and urological complaints (7.8%). No patient developed nephrolithiasis. The median (+interquartile range) serum creatinine level in the 64 patients increased slightly from 74 (63-88) micromol/l to 79 (66-92) micromol/l during the 24 weeks of follow-up. One new patient reached a grade 1 elevation in serum creatinine, which normalized during the follow-up; five other patients with elevated serum creatinine at baseline remained stable. During the 24 weeks of follow-up, the proportion of patients with a viral load <500 copies/ml increased from 35.1% at baseline to 71.4% (ITT NC=F analysis) or 83.3% (OT analysis), and from 0% at baseline to 76.2% (ITT NC=F analysis) or 100.0% (OT analysis) in treatment-experienced and -naive patients, respectively. This was accompanied by a mean increase in CD4 cell count of 52 and 220 cells/mm3 in these two sub-groups, respectively.. The 24-week follow-up data of this study indicate favourable pharmacokinetics of an indinavir/ritonavir 1200/400 mg combination as part of a once-daily regimen consisting also of one or two NRTIs. Short-term safety and efficacy were also satisfactory. Long-term follow up is planned to evaluate the durability of these results.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Two industry-sponsored prospective studies provide some clarification regarding the optimal use of the new PI atazanavir in PI-experienced patients.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Lopinavir; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; Viral Load

A triple-class HAART regimen may be associated with a better virological effect than conventional regimens, but may also lead to toxicity and more profound resistance.. Randomized, controlled, open-label trial of 233 protease inhibitor- and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive HIV-infected patients allocated to a regimen of nelfinavir and nevirapine (1250/200 mg twice daily; n = 118) or ritonavir and saquinavir (400/400 mg twice daily; n = 115), both in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The primary end-point was HIV RNA < or = 20 copies/ml after 48 weeks (missing value = failure). Patients remained under follow-up also in case of switch from the randomized therapy.. At baseline, the median CD4 cell counts were 126 (range: 0-942) (nelfinavir/nevirapine) and 150 (0-642) (ritonavir/saquinavir) cells/mm3, and HIV RNA measurements 5.0 copies/ml (1.3-6.4) in both groups. A total of 102 (86%) and 101 (88%) were antiretroviral-naive. 44% discontinued randomized therapy; P = 0.13. Of these, 80 and 73% switched therapy due to adverse events; P = 0.99. At week 48, 69 and 56%, respectively, had a HIV RNA < or = 20 copies/ml; P = 0.037.. A regimen of nelfinavir/nevirapine had a favourable virological effect and tolerability over a 48-week period compared with ritonavir/saquinavir, when administered in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. However, more extensive follow-up is required to determine the long-term consequences of triple class HAART regimens, including the development of broad drug resistance.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Saquinavir

The response to regimens including lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) in patients who have received multiple protease (PR) inhibitors (PI) can be analyzed in terms of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genotypic and pharmacokinetic (pK) determinants. We studied these factors and the evolution of HIV-1 resistance in response to LPV/r in a prospective study of patients receiving LPV/r under a temporary authorization in Bordeaux, France. HIV-1 PR and reverse transcriptase sequences were determined at baseline LPV/r for all the patients and at month 3 (M3) and M6 in the absence of response to treatment. pK measurements were determined at M1 and M3. Virological failure (VF) was defined as a plasma viral load >or=400 copies/ml at M3. A multivariate analysis of the predictors of VF, including clinical and biological characteristics and the treatment history of the patients, was performed. The PR gene sequence at M0, including individual mutations or a previously defined LPV mutation score (D. J. Kempf, J. D. Isaacson, M. S. King, S. C. Brun, Y. Xu, K. Real, B. M. Bernstein, A. J. Japour, E. Sun, and R. A. Rode, J. Virol. 75:7262-7269, 2001), and the individual exposure to LPV were also included covariates. Sixty-eight patients were enrolled. Thirty-four percent had a virological response at M3. An LPV mutation score of >5 mutations, the presence of the PR I54V mutation at baseline, a high number of previous PIs, prior therapy with ritonavir or indinavir, absence of coprescription of efavirenz, and a lower exposure to LPV or lower LPV trough concentrations were independently associated with VF on LPV/r. Additional PI resistance mutations, including primary mutation I50V, could be selected in patients failing on LPV/r. Genotypic and pK parameters should be used to optimize the virological response to LPV/r in PI-experienced patients and to avoid further viral evolution.

Topics: Adult; Amino Acid Substitution; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Combinations; Female; Genotype; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Models, Biological; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Salvage Therapy

The 24-week extension of AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 359, a study of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected, indinavir-experienced patients, was designed to study the durability of "salvage" treatment regimens. Patients received saquinavir in combination with either ritonavir or nelfinavir and, in addition, delavirdine, adefovir, or both. Patients who demonstrated a virologic response at weeks 12-16 were eligible to continue therapy in the extension through week 48. Of the 105 eligible subjects who were enrolled in the extension, 86 (82%) completed 48 weeks, and 49 (57%) of those 86 had HIV RNA levels

Topics: Antiviral Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Delavirdine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Prospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Salvage Therapy; Saquinavir

To compare information on body fat changes from questionnaire and clinical examination and to study lipoatrophy in HIV-1 patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).. The study was cross-sectional within a randomized trial. One hundred and sixty-eight male HIV-1 patients were examined by questionnaire and clinical examination. Clinical lipoatrophy was studied and defined as fat wasting in the face, legs and/or arms. Fasting blood samples reflecting lipid and glucose metabolism were taken and the role of indinavir, ritonavir (RTV) and RTV/saquinavir (SQV) on lipoatrophy was investigated.. After a median of 17 months on HAART, concordance rates between information on changes in body fat from questionnaire and clinical examination were significant and varied from 70 to 96%. With a positive criteria of lipoatrophy in both assessments, 14% of patients had lipoatrophy. These patients had lower weight (P = 0.0007), weight loss from baseline (P = 0.003), lower circumferences at all measurements (P < 0.01), lower plasma triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (P < 0.05) and longer treatment with stavudine (P = 0.0009). Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) estimates for insulin resistance and beta-cell function were comparable. Plasma cholesterol, triglycerides and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) were higher in patients receiving RTV or RTV/SQV (P < 0.03).. Questionnaire and clinical assessment provide concordant information on changes in body fat. Lipoatrophic patients on HAART with neither increase in abdominal circumference, nor hyperlipidaemia nor glucose intolerance may have side-effects to protease inhibitor treatment, to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor treatment (stavudine) or suffer from a drug-independent condition.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Body Composition; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucose Intolerance; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV Wasting Syndrome; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Indinavir; Lipodystrophy; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Stavudine; Surveys and Questionnaires

To evaluate safety and efficacy of the protease inhibitor combination ritonavir/indinavir 100/800 mg twice daily plus 2-3 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) in antiretroviral-naive patients.. Within this open-label, uncontrolled multicentre trial, antiretroviral-naive patients (n = 57) with median baseline HIV-RNA of 308,000 copies/mL (range 170-3.01 million copies/mL) and median CD4 cell count of 50 cells/microL (range 0-853 cells/microL) were started on 2-3 NRTIs plus ritonavir/indinavir 100/800 mg twice daily. CD4 cell counts and HIV-RNA were determined at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 48. Statistical analysis was performed on treatment as well as intent-to-treat.. Viral load decreased by a median of 3.79 log10 copies/mL (range 2.0-4.60 log10 copies/mL) until week 48. At week 48, 23/57 (40%, intent-to-treat) patients showed a viral load

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Germany; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Follow-Up Studies; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Oxazines; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Saquinavir; Triglycerides

The pharmacokinetic profile of protease inhibitors (PI) is improved significantly by adding low doses of ritonavir (rit). The use of rit-boosted PI allows the reduction of pill burden, improves dosing schedules and enhances drug exposure, all factors that have been associated with a greater benefit of antiretroviral therapy. All patients receiving rit 100 mg bid together with saquinavir (SQV) soft gel 1000 mg bid, indinavir (IDV) 800 mg bid or lopinavir (LPV) 400 mg bid, as part of a salvage regimen, were retrospectively analyzed in a reference institution. Only subjects who had failed all three antiretroviral drug families in the past were included. A total of 299 patients were included in the study (121 on SQV, 62 on IDV and 116 on LPV). Mean plasma HIV-RNA and CD4 lymphocyte counts at baseline were less favourable in the LPV group (4.4 logs, 275 cells/microl) with respect to SQV (4.3 logs, 355 cells/microl) and IDV (3.7 logs, 409 cells/microl) groups (P < 0.05). The proportion of subjects experiencing virological success (attainment of either < 500 HIV-RNA copies/ml or > 1 log reduction) in an intent-to-treat analysis at 24 weeks was 61% with LPV, 49% with SQV and 48% with IDV. The CD4 count increased 48% with SQV, 45% with IDV and 37% with LPV. The proportion of subjects discontinuing therapy due to adverse events was higher using IDV (27%) than using either SQV (11%) or LPV (6%) (P < 0.05). The presence of < 5 or > 5 PI resistance mutations at baseline discriminated significantly better who would respond to therapy in all instances: 90 vs. 48% with LPV, 95 vs. 21% with SQV and 90 vs. 23% with IDV. The efficacy of rit-boosted PI combinations is greatly influenced by the extent of baseline PI resistance. Differences, not only in potency, but mainly in tolerance may favour the selection of one dual PI combination over others.

Topics: Adult; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Salvage Therapy; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Circadian Rhythm; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Nelfinavir; Ritonavir; Saquinavir

There is no standard treatment of HIV-infected patients who fail protease inhibitor (PI)-containing antiretroviral therapy. This open-label, noncomparative 24-week study with a 24-week extension evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of twice-daily indinavir/ritonavir 800/200 mg plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in this population. Presented here are the results of the 24-week study. Patients were HIV-infected adults who had prior viral RNA (vRNA) suppression (<400 copies/mL), subsequent failure (> or =400 and < or =100,000 copies/mL) on antiretroviral therapy, and at least one new NRTI available for treatment. The proportions of patients achieving plasma vRNA <400 and <50 copies/mL were analyzed with data as observed (DAO) and intention-to-treat (ITT) models using generalized estimating equations (GEE) or counting noncompleters as failures (NC = F). Mean changes from baseline in vRNA and CD4 cell count were evaluated using DAO and an ITT mixed-model approach. Sixty-three patients (87% male) with a mean age of 42 years and mean baseline vRNA and CD4 cell counts of 3.8 log(10) copies/mL and 360 cells/mm(3), respectively, were enrolled. The proportion (95% confidence interval) of patients achieving vRNA <400 and <50 copies/mL at week 24 were 76% (61%, 87%) and 50% (35%, 65%) for DAO, 64% (50%, 75%) and 43% (30%, 56%) for GEE, and 56% (43%, 68%) and 37% (25%, 50%) for NC = F, respectively. At Week 24, baseline vRNA decreased by >1.0 log(10) copies/mL and CD4 cell counts increased by approximately 90 cells/mm(3). Three patients (5%) experienced serious drug-related adverse events. Seven patients (11%) discontinued treatment due to clinical or laboratory adverse events. In this study, the enhanced, twice-daily regimen of indinavir/ritonavir 800/200 mg plus 2 NRTIs provided suppression of HIV in many patients who had failed a PI-containing regimen and was generally well tolerated.

Topics: Acidosis; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Hypercholesterolemia; Hyperglycemia; Hypertriglyceridemia; Indinavir; Kidney Calculi; Male; Middle Aged; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Failure

Low-dose ritonavir can boost plasma levels of indinavir, thereby enhancing its antiretroviral activity despite less frequent dosing. In this open-label, noncomparative, 24-week trial with a 24-week extension phase, HIV-infected protease inhibitor (PI)- and lamivudine-naive adults received indinavir/ritonavir 800 mg/100 mg plus stavudine and lamivudine every 12 hours. The proportions of patients achieving plasma HIV RNA (vRNA) <400 and <50 copies/mL were analyzed with data as observed (DAO) and intention-to-treat models using generalized estimating equations (GEE) or counting noncompleters as failures (NC = F). Eighty-nine patients (80% men) with a median age of 36 years and mean baseline vRNA levels and CD4 counts of 5.01 log(10) copies/mL and 269 cells/mm(3) were enrolled. The proportions (95% confidence interval [CI]) of patients achieving vRNA <400 copies/mL were 93% (84%, 98%), 78% (67%, 86%), and 68% (57%, 78%) at week 24 for DAO, GEE, and NC = F analyses, respectively; the corresponding results at week 48 were 95% (84%, 99%), 65% (53%, 76%), and 45% (35%, 57%). Most patients with vRNA <400 had <50 copies/mL. At week 48, baseline vRNA decreased by >2 log(10) copies/mL and CD4 counts increased by approximately 200 cells/mm(3). Five patients (6%) experienced serious drug-related adverse experiences. Twenty patients (23%) discontinued therapy due to adverse experiences. In this study, twice-daily indinavir 800 mg/ritonavir 100 mg with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors provided potent viral suppression and immunologic reconstitution in many PI-naive patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anemia; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Dehydration; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Kidney Diseases; Lipoproteins; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Virus Replication

The virological response of multiple protease inhibitor-experienced, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive, HIV-1-infected subjects was examined with respect to baseline viral phenotype and genotype through 72 weeks of therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir plus efavirenz and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (Study M98-957). Using a 'dropouts as censored' analysis, plasma HIV RNA < or = 400 copies/ml was observed in 93% (25/27), 73% (11/15) and 25% (2/8) of subjects with <10-fold, 10- to 40-fold, and >40-fold reduced susceptibility to lopinavir at baseline, respectively. In addition, virological response was observed in 91% (21/23), 71% (15/21) and 33% (2/6) of subjects with baseline lopinavir mutation score of 0-5, 6-7 and > or = 8, respectively. Through 72 weeks, all subjects experiencing virological failure whose baseline isolates contained six or more protease inhibitor mutations had a common genotypic pattern, with mutations at positions 82, 54 and 10, along with a median of four additional mutations in protease. However, an equal number of subjects with a similar genotypic pattern experienced virological response. Further analysis revealed the baseline phenotypic susceptibility to lopinavir to be an additional covariate predicting response in this subset of subjects. In multivariate analyses, baseline susceptibility to lopinavir was associated with response at each time point examined (weeks 24, 48 and 72). These results provide guidance for clinically relevant interpretation of phenotypic and genotypic resistance tests when applied to lopinavir/ritonavir.

Topics: Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genes, Viral; Genotype; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Logistic Models; Lopinavir; Mutation; Phenotype; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Time Factors; Viral Load

The molecular basis of lipodystrophy, a syndrome associated with HIV antiretroviral (ARV) therapy, remains unknown.. To examine whether ARV therapy might inhibit the expression of CD36, which is known to play an important role in fatty acid and glucose metabolism, and if this might contribute to the metabolic alterations associated with lipodystrophy.. The effects of ARV therapy on CD36 levels was examined in vivo in a prospective cohort of individuals treated with ARV therapy and in vitro in assays of human cell lines exposed to ARV drugs.. Monocyte CD36 levels were assessed by flow cytometry at baseline and after 7 days of therapy in five healthy volunteers and 10 treatment-naive HIV-1-infected individuals. ARV therapy included protease inhibitors (ritonavir, nelfinavir or lopinavir/ritonavir). In addition, human cell lines (THP-1 and C32) were assessed for CD36 levels pre and post-ritonavir treatment.. Three of four healthy controls (one withdrew because of adverse effects) and 6 of 10 HIV-1-infected individuals had a 50 to > 90% decrease in monocyte CD36 levels after 7 days of therapy. One of ten HIV-infected subjects had a 30% decrease, and the remaining individuals had no change or an increase in CD36 levels. CD36 levels decreased significantly in human cell lines treated with ritonavir but not in those treated with zidovudine.. ARV therapy resulted in a marked decrease in CD36 in approximately 70% of our participants. Sustained ARV therapy-induced CD36 deficiency may contribute to insulin resistance and other metabolic complications of lipodystrophy.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD36 Antigens; Cell Line; Cohort Studies; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Insulin Resistance; Lipodystrophy; Monocytes; Prospective Studies; Ritonavir; Zidovudine

The safety and antiviral activity of lopinavir (Lpv), a protease inhibitor (PI) coformulated with ritonavir (Rtv) to enhance its pharmacokinetic properties, were evaluated in 70 patients with plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels of 1000-100,000 copies/mL on a first PI-containing regimen. Patients were randomized to substitute only the PI with Lpv/Rtv, 400/100 mg or 400/200 mg twice daily. On day 15, nevirapine (200 mg 2x/day) was added, and nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors were changed. Despite a >4-fold reduction in phenotypic susceptibility to the preentry PI in 63% of patients, mean plasma HIV-1 RNA levels declined by 1.14 log(10) copies/mL after 2 weeks of Lpv/Rtv. At week 48, 86% of subjects receiving treatment had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of <400 copies/mL; 76% had levels <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (intent-to-treat: 70% and 60%, respectively). Mean CD4 cell counts increased by 125 cells/muL. Three patients discontinued therapy for drug-related adverse events.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Nevirapine; Prospective Studies; Pyrimidinones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome

The relative potency and tolerability of multidrug regimens used to treat infants and children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) are largely unknown. In Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) Protocol 377, 181 infants and children were assigned to receive stavudine (d4T) plus nevirapine (NVP) and ritonavir (RTV); d4T plus lamivudine (3TC) and nelfinavir (NFV); d4T plus NVP and NFV; or d4T plus 3TC, NVP, and NFV. Eleven additional children received d4T and NVP plus NFV given twice daily. All subjects had not previously received protease inhibitors or nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors and all had been immunologically stable while receiving reverse-transcriptase inhibitor therapy. After 48 weeks of therapy, 17 (41%) of 41 subjects receiving d4T-NVP-RTV, 13 (30%) of 44 receiving d4T-NVP-NFV, 21 (42%) of 50 receiving d4T-3TC and NFV (3 times daily), and 22 (52%) of 42 receiving d4T-3TC-NVP-NFV were still receiving their assigned therapy and had HIV-1 RNA suppression to

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Lamivudine; Male; Nelfinavir; Nevirapine; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Stavudine

A study was designed to determine the interactions, both clinical and pharmacokinetic, between methadone and lopinavir-ritonavir. Results demonstrated a 36% reduction in the methadone area under the plasma concentration-time curve after the introduction of lopinavir-ritonavir, with no coincident symptoms of opioid withdrawal and no requirement for methadone dose adjustment.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Drug Interactions; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Methadone; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pyrimidinones; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children often suffer from impaired growth. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) successfully reduces HIV 1 (HIV-1) RNA to 400 copies/mL or less in many children.. To determine if age- and sex-adjusted growth z scores correlate with HIV-1 RNA level and if control of viral load for 48 and 96 weeks results in improved growth in children receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.. Secondary analysis of the cohort of children receiving ritonavir nested in a randomized, open-label, clinical trial.. The Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 338 enrolled clinically stable, antiretroviral therapy-experienced, HIV-infected subjects aged 2 through 17 years. Using data from subjects randomized to ritonavir-containing regimens (n = 197), the association of growth z scores and HIV-1 RNA levels were examined.. Age- and sex-adjusted weight and height z scores.. Enrollment weights were comparable with age- and sex-adjusted norms, but subjects receiving ritonavir-containing antiretroviral therapy were significantly shorter (mean z score, -0.57 [29th percentile]; 95% confidence interval, -0.73 to -0.40). Higher HIV-1 RNA levels correlated with lower growth z scores (P<.01). Subjects achieving and maintaining HIV-1 RNA of 400 copies/mL or less through 48 and 96 weeks experienced worse growth than subjects with a less controlled viral load.. In this pediatric cohort, a significant decline in height and weight z scores was found despite control of viral replication. Further studies of growth are necessary to assess if nutritional and hormonal adjuvants to highly active antiretroviral therapy should be considered to improve growth in HIV-infected children.

Topics: Adolescent; Age Distribution; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Female; Growth; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir; Sex Distribution