rifampin and Foreign-Body-Reaction

The efficacy of daptomycin, imipenem, or rifampin with fosfomycin was evaluated and compared with that of daptomycin-rifampin in a tissue cage model infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Strain HUSA 304 was used. The study yielded the following results for MICs (in μg/ml): fosfomycin, 4; daptomycin, 1; imipenem, 0.25; and rifampin, 0.03. The study yielded the following results for minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) (in μg/ml): fosfomycin, 8; daptomycin, 4; imipenem, 32; and rifampin, 0.5. Daptomycin-rifampin was confirmed as the most effective therapy against MRSA foreign-body infections. Fosfomycin combinations with high doses of daptomycin and rifampin were efficacious alternative therapies in this setting. Fosfomycin-imipenem was relatively ineffective and did not protect against resistance.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Colony Count, Microbial; Daptomycin; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Foreign-Body Reaction; Fosfomycin; Imipenem; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Rifampin; Staphylococcal Infections

We investigated the activity of linezolid, alone and in combination with rifampin (rifampicin), against a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain in vitro and in a guinea pig model of foreign-body infection. The MIC, minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) in logarithmic phase, and MBC in stationary growth phase were 2.5, >20, and >20 microg/ml, respectively, for linezolid; 0.01, 0.08, and 2.5 microg/ml, respectively, for rifampin; and 0.16, 0.63, >20 microg/ml, respectively, for levofloxacin. In time-kill studies, bacterial regrowth and the development of rifampin resistance were observed after 24 h with rifampin alone at 1x or 4x the MIC and were prevented by the addition of linezolid. After the administration of single intraperitoneal doses of 25, 50, and 75 mg/kg of body weight, linezolid peak concentrations of 6.8, 12.7, and 18.1 microg/ml, respectively, were achieved in sterile cage fluid at approximately 3 h. The linezolid concentration remained above the MIC of the test organism for 12 h with all doses. Antimicrobial treatments of animals with cage implant infections were given twice daily for 4 days. Linezolid alone at 25, 50, and 75 mg/kg reduced the planktonic bacteria in cage fluid during treatment by 1.2 to 1.7 log(10) CFU/ml; only linezolid at 75 mg/kg prevented bacterial regrowth 5 days after the end of treatment. Linezolid used in combination with rifampin (12.5 mg/kg) was more effective than linezolid used as monotherapy, reducing the planktonic bacteria by >or=3 log(10) CFU (P < 0.05). Efficacy in the eradication of cage-associated infection was achieved only when linezolid was combined with rifampin, with cure rates being between 50% and 60%, whereas the levofloxacin-rifampin combination demonstrated the highest cure rate (91%) against the strain tested. The linezolid-rifampin combination is a treatment option for implant-associated infections caused by quinolone-resistant MRSA.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Colony Count, Microbial; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Foreign-Body Reaction; Guinea Pigs; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Linezolid; Male; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Models, Animal; Oxazolidinones; Plankton; Rifampin; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Time Factors

Since the currently approved dose of daptomycin (6 mg/kg of body weight/day) has been associated with clinical failures and resistance development, higher doses for some difficult-to-treat infections are being proposed. We studied the efficacy of daptomycin at high doses (equivalent to 10 mg/kg/day in humans) and compared it to that of reference and alternative treatments in a model of foreign-body infection with methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In vitro studies were conducted with bacteria in the log and stationary phases. For the in vivo model, therapy with daptomycin at 100 mg/kg/day, vancomycin at 50 mg/kg/12 h, rifampin (rifampicin) at 25 mg/kg/12 h, or linezolid at 35 mg/kg/12 h was administered for 7 days. Antibiotic efficacy was evaluated using either bacteria from tissue cage fluids or those attached to coverslips. We screened for the emergence of linezolid- and rifampin-resistant strains and analyzed the surviving population from the daptomycin-treated group. Only daptomycin was bactericidal in both the log- and stationary-phase studies. Daptomycin (decrease in the log number of CFU per milliliter of tissue cage fluid, 2.57) and rifampin (decrease, 2.6 log CFU/ml) were better (P < 0.05) than vancomycin (decrease, 1.1 log CFU/ml) and linezolid (decrease, 0.9 log CFU/ml) in the animal model. Rifampin-resistant strains appeared in 60% of cases, whereas no linezolid resistance emerged. No daptomycin-resistant subpopulations were detected at frequencies of 10(-7) or higher. In conclusion, daptomycin at high doses proved to be as effective as rifampin, and the two were the most active therapies for this experimental foreign-body infection. These high doses ensured a profile of safety from the development of resistance.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Daptomycin; Foreign-Body Reaction; Humans; Male; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Rats; Rats, Wistar

We compared the efficacy of a novel rifamycin derivative, ABI-0043, with that of rifampin, alone and in combination with levofloxacin, against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 in a guinea pig tissue-cage infection model. The MIC, logarithmic-growth-phase minimal bactericidal concentration, and stationary-growth-phase minimal bactericidal concentration of ABI-0043 were 0.001, 0.008, and 0.25 microg/ml, respectively; the corresponding concentrations of rifampin were 0.016, 0.8, and 3.6 microg/ml, respectively. After a single intraperitoneal dose of 12.5 mg/kg of body weight, the peak concentration in cage fluid was 1.13 micarog/ml of ABI-0043 and 0.98 microg/ml of rifampin. Five days after completion of treatment, levofloxacin administered alone (5 mg/kg/12 h) resulted in bacterial counts in cage fluid that were similar to those for untreated controls (>8.0 log(10) CFU/ml), whereas rifampin and ABI-0043 administered alone (12.5 mg/kg/12 h) decreased the mean titers of bacteria +/- standard deviations to 1.43 +/- 0.28 log(10) and 1.57 +/- 0.53 log(10) CFU/ml, respectively, in cage fluid. In combination with levofloxacin, both rifamycins cleared bacteria from the cage fluid. The cure rates of cage-associated infections with rifampin and ABI-0043 administered alone were 46% and 58%, respectively, and increased to 88% and 92% in combination with levofloxacin. Emergence of rifamycin resistance was observed in 42% of cages after ABI-0043 therapy and in 38% of cages after rifampin therapy; no emergence of resistance occurred with combination treatment with levofloxacin. In conclusion, ABI-0043 had cure rates comparable to that of rifampin. ABI-0043 in combination with a quinolone has the potential for treatment of implant-associated infections caused by susceptible strains of S. aureus, potentially without drug-drug interactions.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Colony Count, Microbial; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Foreign-Body Reaction; Guinea Pigs; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Levofloxacin; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Molecular Structure; Ofloxacin; Rifampin; Rifamycins; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Time Factors

Antimicrobial efficacy in orthopedic device infections is diminished because of bacterial biofilms which express tolerance to antibiotics. Recently, the use of high doses of levofloxacin with rifampin has been recommended for staphylococcal infections. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of levofloxacin at doses of 50 mg/kg/day and 100 mg/kg/day (mimicking the usual and high human doses of 500 mg/day and 750 to 1,000 mg/day, respectively) and compared it to that of to linezolid, cloxacillin, vancomycin, and rifampin in a rat tissue cage model of experimental foreign-body infection by Staphylococcus aureus. The antimicrobial efficacy in vitro (by MIC, minimum bactericidal concentration, and kill curves) for logarithmic- and stationary-phase bacteria was compared with the in vivo efficacy. In vitro bactericidal activity at clinically relevant concentrations was reached by all drugs except rifampin and linezolid in the log-phase studies but only by levofloxacin in the stationary-phase studies. The bacterial count decreases from in vivo tissue cage fluids (means) for levofloxacin at 50 and 100 mg/kg/day, rifampin, cloxacillin, vancomycin, linezolid, and controls, respectively, were: -1.24, -2.26, -2.1, -1.56, -1.47, -1.15, and 0.33 (all groups versus controls, P < 0.05). Levofloxacin at 100 mg/kg/day (area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio, 234) was the most active therapy (P = 0.03 versus linezolid). Overall, in vivo efficacy was better predicted by stationary-phase studies, in which it reached a high correlation coefficient even if the rifampin group was excluded (r = 0.96; P < 0.05). Our results, including in vitro studies with nongrowing bacteria, pharmacodynamic parameters, and antimicrobial efficacy in experimental infection, provide good evidence to support the use of levofloxacin at high doses (750 to 1,000 mg/day), as recently recommended for treating patients with orthopedic prosthesis infections.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Cloxacillin; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Foreign-Body Reaction; Humans; Levofloxacin; Linezolid; Male; Methicillin; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Ofloxacin; Oxazolidinones; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Rifampin; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Vancomycin

The prophylactic and therapeutic activities of teicoplanin were evaluated in two different experimental models of foreign body infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In a guinea pig model of prophylaxis, subcutaneously implanted tissue cages were infected at a > 90% rate by 10(2) CFU of MRSA in control animals. A single dose of 30 mg of teicoplanin per kg of body weight administered intraperitoneally 6 h before bacterial challenge was as effective as vancomycin in preventing experimental infection in tissue cages injected with either 10(2), 10(3), or 10(4) CFU of MRSA. In a rat model evaluating the therapy of chronic tissue cage infection caused by MRSA, the efficacy of a 7-day high-dose (30 mg/kg once daily) regimen of teicoplanin was compared with that of vancomycin (50 mg/kg twice daily). Whereas high levels of teicoplanin were found in tissue cage fluid, continuously exceeding its MBC for MRSA by 8- to 16-fold, no significant reduction in the viable counts of MRSA occurred during therapy. In contrast, either vancomycin alone or a combined regimen of high-dose teicoplanin plus rifampin (25 mg/kg twice daily) could significantly decrease the viable counts in tissue cage fluids. Whereas the bacteria recovered from tissue cage fluids during therapy showed no evidence of teicoplanin resistance, they failed to be killed even by high levels of this antimicrobial agent. The altered susceptibility of in vivo growing bacteria to teicoplanin killing might in part explain the defective activity of this antimicrobial agent when used as monotherapy against chronic S. aureus infections. These data may indicate the need for a combined regimen of teicoplanin with other agents such as rifampin to optimize the therapy of severe staphylococcal infections.

Topics: Animals; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Foreign-Body Reaction; Methicillin Resistance; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Rifampin; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Teicoplanin; Vancomycin

We compared the efficacy of a long-duration (3-week) therapy of vancomycin, fleroxacin, fleroxacin plus rifampin, and vancomycin plus fleroxacin and rifampin in a recently developed rat model of chronic staphylococcal foreign-body infection. Subcutaneous tissue cages containing polymethylmethacrylate coverslips were infected with 1 x 10(5) to 5 x 10(5) CFU of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Three weeks later, a quantitative culturing of the fluid that had accumulated in the cages was done (mean, 6.72 log10 CFU/ml; n = 110) and treatment was initiated after randomization. The CFUs in the cage fluid were counted on days 11 and 22 and 1 week after the termination of treatment; in addition, a final culture of coverslips (surface-bound microorganisms) was performed. The three-drug therapy was significantly superior to the other treatments on day 11 (a 5.16 log10 decrease of bacterial counts versus a 2.12 log10 to 2.94 log10 decrease for vancomycin, fleroxacin, and fleroxacin plus rifampin; P less than 0.01). On day 22, count decreases were 4.16 log10 for vancomycin, 4.91 log10 for fleroxacin (vancomycin versus fleroxacin, not significant), 6.14 log10 for two-drug therapy, and 6.34 log10 for three-drug therapy (vancomycin-fleroxacin-rifampin versus fleroxacin-rifampin, not significant; fleroxacin-rifampin versus monotherapies, P less than 0.01); the numbers of CFU in most cage fluids were under the detection limit (20 CFU/ml) in combination groups. One week after the end of treatment, 92% of fluids and coverslips (detection limit, 1 CFU) were culture negative with tritherapy, 88% of fluids and 41% of coverslips were negative with bitherapy, and less than 12% of fluids and coverslips were negative with single drugs (for coverslips, P was <0.01 for vancomycin-fleroxacin-rifampin versus fleroxacin-rifampin and P was <0.001 for fleroxacin-rifampin versus the monotherapies). No mutants resistant to rifampin or fleroxacin were detected. In conclusion, antimicrobial combinations were highly effective and superior to single drugs in treating a chronic staphylococcal foreign-body infection for 3 weeks. The three-drug therapy decreased bacterial counts more rapidly than the two-drug therapy under study and appeared to be curative in most cases.

Topics: Animals; Cells, Cultured; Chronic Disease; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fleroxacin; Foreign-Body Reaction; Methicillin Resistance; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Rifampin; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Vancomycin

A novel model of experimental foreign body infection was developed in rats: four perforated Teflon tissue cages per animal were implanted subcutaneously and 3 to 4 weeks later were infected with 0.5 x 10(5) to 2 x 10(5) CFU of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. After 2 weeks, the number of CFU in the cage fluid was determined [day 1 mean, (7.25 +/- 0.79) log10 CFU/ml], and treatment with vancomycin (50 mg/kg twice a day [BID]), fleroxacin (50 mg/kg BID), or fifampin (25 mg/kg BID), alone and in combination, was initiated for a duration of 6 days. Concentrations of antibiotics in cage fluids were in the range of those encountered in clinical conditions. Eighteen hours after the last injection (day 7), the number of CFU in the cage fluid was determined and the difference between day 1 and day 7 values was calculated. Rifampin, alone and in combination with fleroxacin or vancomycin, was the most effective regimen in reducing the bacterial counts in the tissue cage fluids [(1.87 +/- 1.44, 2.18 +/- 1.02, and 2.55 +/- 1.09 log10) CFU/ml, P less than 0.001, respectively]. After treatment, cage fluids and cages were analyzed for resistant bacteria. Resistance to rifampin occurred in 15 of 19 cages in animals treated with rifampin alone and in 4 of 25 in animals treated with rifampin plus vancomycin. We detected no development of resistance to rifampin in animals treated with rifampin plus fleroxacin or to fleroxacin in animals treated with this antimicrobial agent. In conclusion, regimens including rifampin alone or in combination with vancomycin or fleroxacin were an effective treatment of foreign body infection due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus in reducing bacteria counts, but rifampin monotherapy was compromised by significant emergence of resistance. The combined therapy of fleroxacin with rifampin prevent development of resistance to rifampin.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ciprofloxacin; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fleroxacin; Foreign-Body Reaction; Male; Methicillin Resistance; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Rifampin; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Vancomycin

Implanted foreign bodies are highly susceptible to pyogenic infection. Whereas infection up to 3 months after surgery is probably due to perioperative bacterial contamination, little is known about the pathogenesis of late prosthetic infections. We employed an animal model to determine whether subcutaneously implanted foreign bodies were susceptible to experimental bacteremia. Tissue cages were implanted into guinea pigs, which were infected at the earliest 4 weeks later by intracardiac injection of Staphylococcus aureus Wood 46. The injection of 2 X 10(6) cfu did not result in any infection. Inoculation of 5 X 10(7) cfu resulted in a bacteremia of 10(2)-10(3) cfu/ml after 5 min and led to 11/26 selective tissue cage infections with no microbiological evidence of infection elsewhere. Higher inocula caused systemic infections with foci in different organs. Rifampin (7.5 mg/kg b.i.d.) was administered for 48 h, starting at different times after infection to establish the best timing for efficacious short-term therapy. When treatment was begun 1 h before or 3 h after inoculation, complete protection was observed, whereas 1/12 and 3/15 tissue cages remained infected when the first dose was not given until 24 h and 48 h, respectively, after inoculation. These experiments illustrate that implanted prostheses are highly susceptible even to bacteremias with low density of microorganisms. Prophylaxis can prevent such infections, whereas delayed short-term treatment may fail.

Topics: Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Foreign-Body Reaction; Guinea Pigs; Rifampin; Sepsis; Time Factors