refludan and Venous-Thromboembolism

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated disorder caused by the development of antibodies to platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. The thrombocytopenia is typically moderate, with a median platelet count nadir of approximately 50 to 60 x 10(9) platelets/L. Severe thrombocytopenia has been described in patients with HIT, and in these patients antibody levels are high and severe clinical outcomes have been reported (eg, disseminated intravascular coagulation with microvascular thrombosis). The timing of the thrombocytopenia in relation to the initiation of heparin therapy is critically important, with the platelet count beginning to drop within 5 to 10 days of starting heparin. A more rapid drop in the platelet count can occur in patients who have been recently exposed to heparin (within the preceding 3 months), due to preformed anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies. A delayed form of HIT has also been described that develops within days or weeks after the heparin has been discontinued. In contrast to other drug-induced thrombocytopenias, HIT is characterized by an increased risk for thromboembolic complications, primarily venous thromboembolism. Heparin and all heparin-containing products should be discontinued and an alternative, non-heparin anticoagulant initiated. Alternative agents that have been used effectively in patients with HIT include lepirudin, argatroban, bivalirudin, and danaparoid, although the last agent is not available in North America. Fondaparinux has been used in a small number of patients with HIT and generally appears to be safe. Warfarin therapy should not be initiated until the platelet count has recovered and the patient is systemically anticoagulated, and vitamin K should be administered to patients receiving warfarin at the time of diagnosis of HIT.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arginine; Autoantibodies; Contraindications; Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Pipecolic Acids; Platelet Count; Platelet Factor 4; Polysaccharides; Recombinant Proteins; Sulfonamides; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombophilia; Time Factors; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K; Warfarin

Patients with central nervous system (CNS) malignancies have a substantial risk for developing both thrombotic and bleeding disorders. The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is substantially higher in these patients, both in the perioperative period and throughout their disease course. Patients with CNS malignancy harbor a latent hypercoagulability, which predisposes to VTE, as do postoperative immobility, hemiparesis, and other factors. The management of VTE in these patients is complex, given the significant morbidity and mortality associated with intratumoral hemorrhage. In the past, the perceived risk of intracranial hemorrhage limited the use of anticoagulation for the management of VTE with many favoring nonpharmacologic methods for prophylaxis and treatment. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters have since lost favor at many centers given significant complications, which appear to be more frequent in patients with CNS malignancy. Recent studies have demonstrated safe and efficacious use of anticoagulation in these patients with a low incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Treatment of established VTE is now recommended in this population with many centers favoring low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) versus oral warfarin for short- or long-term treatment. We advocate a multimodality approach utilizing compression stockings, intermittent compression devices, and heparin in the perioperative setting as the best proven method to reduce the risk of VTE. In the absence of a strict contraindication to systemic anticoagulation, such as previous intracranial hemorrhage or profound thrombocytopenia, we recommend LMWH in patients with newly diagnosed VTE and a CNS malignancy.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Bevacizumab; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Fondaparinux; Glioblastoma; Glioma; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Hirudins; Humans; Pipecolic Acids; Polysaccharides; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Recombinant Proteins; Sulfonamides; Thrombocytopenia; Vena Cava Filters; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis; Warfarin

The direct thrombin inhibitor lepirudin is mainly applied in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. We report here the case of a 37-year-old kurdish woman in whom Behcets disease was diagnosed in 1998 when she presented with a Budd Chiari syndrome (BCS) complicated by pulmonary embolism. Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurred despite anticoagulant therapy with UFH, LMWH or phenprocoumon and various immunosuppressive therapy regimens. In 2001, when BCS recurred ultimately i.v. lepirudin was administered. When the patient improved and remained clinically stable lepirudin was applied subcutaneously. During long-term treatment with twice-daily 50 mg no further VTE was observed over the following years. Additionally, no bleeding complications occurred. In May 2005 anticoagulant therapy was switched to phenprocoumon. BCS reoccurred when INR values were suboptimal in February 2007, and lepirudin treatment was immediately restarted. After admission the patient received 50 mg b.i.d. lepirudin s.c. with plasma levels in the therapeutic range (0.5-1.0 mg / l). Over the following months, lepirudin levels repeatedly exceeded the upper limit of this range and the dosage was stepwise reduced. Finally, 20 mg b.i.d. were sufficient to obtain therapeutic levels. Renal function was normal, but lepirudin antibodies were present in high titer, as assessed by ELISA. We suppose that these antibodies reduce renal filtration of lepirudin thus leading to increased plasma levels. This case is an example for successful long-term therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with s.c. lepirudin in a patient with Behcets disease and recurrent VTE despite therapeutic anticoagulant therapy with LMWH or vitamin K antagonists. However, frequent measurement of lepirudin plasma levels is needed. If stepwise dose lowering is required over time, the presence of lepirudin antibodies should be considered.

Topics: Adult; Antibodies; Anticoagulants; Behcet Syndrome; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; Venous Thromboembolism

To report the use of subcutaneous lepirudin in an obese patient with heparin resistance.. A 34-year-old morbidly obese male (weight 145 kg) presented with hypoxia on postoperative day 1 following a sigmoid colectomy. A continuous unfractionated heparin infusion was started for a suspected pulmonary embolism. Doses were escalated without therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) response and an antithrombin (AT) level was obtained. The AT level was reported as 78% (reference range 85-120%). Computed tomography angiography ruled out pulmonary embolism and lepirudin 50 mg administered subcutaneously twice daily was started (serum creatinine 1.3 mg/dL) for prevention of venous thromboembolism. The resulting aPTT values were therapeutic (63 and 60 sec, reference range 24-34, therapeutic heparin range 55-85). The dose was adjusted to 25 mg twice daily. aPTT values were 35 and 48 seconds. His serum creatinine increased to 1.6 mg/dL and minor bleeding was noted. The dose was decreased to 25 mg once daily, with resulting aPTT values of 31, 39, and 41 seconds. The patient was discharged to home without development of venous thromboembolism, as confirmed by duplex ultrasonography.. Commonly administered anticoagulants, such as unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, and fondaparinux, exert their effect by complexing with AT and thrombin (Factor IIa), activating AT and preventing thrombin from exerting coagulation effect. Without AT present, these drugs have little effect on inhibiting the coagulation cascade. Lepirudin is a synthetic irreversible direct thrombin inhibitor and does not rely on AT to exert its anticoagulation action. It can be given subcutaneously and is eliminated primarily by the kidneys. Dosage adjustments for both renal function and obesity need to be considered and aPTT should be monitored.. In obese patients or those with heparin resistance, subcutaneous lepirudin can be monitored and the regimen adjusted based on aPTT values. Further studies are warranted to maximize efficacy and define dosing.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Critical Care; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Obesity, Morbid; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Recombinant Proteins; Venous Thromboembolism

Treatment of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) and thrombosis in some cases that represents a clinical challenge, which, if unrecognized, may lead to treatment delay or disease progression with potentially lethal outcome. We present a case of a 19-year-old patient with antiphospholipid syndrome, factor V (FV) Leiden mutation in heterozygous state, and venous thromboembolism. The patient was subjected to intravenous infusions of unfractionated heparin (UFH), and 16 days after the beginning of the treatment, his condition worsened, with thrombocytopenia and extension of thrombosis. Whereas the patient had a high clinical score for HIT II, functional and antigenic assays for the presence of HIT antibodies were negative. After repeated negative functional and antigenic assays, pseudo-HIT was suspected and nadroparin was introduced, which resulted in further worsening of the clinical presentation. Disease remission, along with complete normalization of platelet count, was finally accomplished with the introduction of lepirudin. The presence of multiple comorbid states, such as antiphospholipid syndrome, can potentially make laboratory confirmation of disease more difficult in patients with HIT II. In our opinion, it is of great importance that HIT II diagnosis be primarily clinical and that laboratory test results are carefully interpreted, especially when HIT is indicated by high clinical score values.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antibodies; Anticoagulants; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Diagnosis, Differential; Factor V; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Mutation; Nadroparin; Platelet Count; Recombinant Proteins; Thrombocytopenia; Venous Thromboembolism