redta and Smear-Layer

The purpose of this study was to quantify the volume of 17% ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) needed to efficiently remove the smear layer after rotary instrumentation, and to determine if additional irrigation has any effect on debris removal. Forty single canal teeth were instrumented with ProFile GT rotary instruments. Experimental groups were irrigated with 1, 3, or 10 ml of 17% EDTA for 1 min, followed by a final rinse with 3 ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Samples were scored for debris remaining and examined under SEM to determine quality of smear layer removal. There were no significant differences among groups when comparing either debris remaining or quality of smear layer removal. EDTA irrigation volume greater than 1 ml did not improve debris removal. Efficient removal of the smear layer was accomplished with a final rinse of 1 ml of 17% EDTA for 1 min, followed by 3 ml of 5.25% NaOCl.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Cetrimonium Compounds; Debridement; Edetic Acid; Humans; Root Canal Irrigants; Smear Layer

Previous studies have shown that MTAD (a mixture of a tetracycline isomer, an acid, and a detergent) is an effective antibacterial irrigant as a final rinse to remove the smear layer from the instrumented surface of root canals. In this investigation we examined the cytotoxicity of MTAD compared with that of commonly used irrigants and medications. L929 fibroblasts were grown on cell culture plates and were placed in contact with various concentrations of test irrigants and medications. The cytotoxicity of these materials was evaluated 24 h after incubation using MTT assay. Means and standard deviations of absorbance were calculated for each group and statistically analyzed to determine presence or absence of significant difference between the means. The 50% inhibitory dose values were calculated, ranked, and statistically analyzed using the sign interval for median. Based on our results it seems that MTAD is less cytotoxic than eugenol, 3% H2O2, Ca(OH)2 paste, 5.25% NaOCl, Peridex, and EDTA and more cytotoxic than 2.63%, 1.31%, and 0.66% NaOCl.

Topics: Animals; Calcium Hydroxide; Cell Division; Cetrimonium Compounds; Chlorhexidine; Citric Acid; Coloring Agents; Doxycycline; Edetic Acid; L Cells; Mice; Polysorbates; Root Canal Irrigants; Smear Layer; Sodium Hypochlorite; Tetrazolium Salts; Thiazoles

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of smear layer and canal instrumentation on leakage in root-filled teeth.. Six groups (n = 12) of freshly extracted human canines and premolars with closed apices and single roots were used. Groups A, B, C, and D were instrumented with engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium MCXIM files and Groups E and F were instrumented with conventional stainless steel hand files. Groups A, C, and E were flushed with 3.0 mL of 17.0% REDTA to remove the smear layer prior to obturation. All teeth were flushed with 5.25% NaOCl, then obturated with AH-26 sealer and either the lateral condensation (Groups C-E) or thermomechanical compaction technique (Groups A and B). Copper wire was placed coronally in contact with the gutta-percha in each tooth and, after immersion in 0.9% NaCl solution, a 10 volt dc voltage was connected between each tooth and a stainless steel electrode. The current flow in the circuit was observed for 45 days. One way ANOVA and Duncan's Multiple Range Test were used to compare Groups A-F at time intervals of 10, 20, 30 and 45 days and identify statistically significant differences.. Significantly less microleakage occurred when the smear layer was removed and when the canals were obturated with thermoplasticized gutta-percha. Canals instrumented with engine-driven NiTi files exhibited less leakage than hand-instrumented canals irrespective of obturation method.. Smear layer removal is beneficial to root canal sealing. Obturation with thermoplasticized gutta-percha provides a superior seal whilst canal instrumentation with engine-driven NiTi files reduces the extent of microleakage in root canals.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Bicuspid; Bismuth; Cetrimonium Compounds; Chelating Agents; Cuspid; Dental Alloys; Dental Leakage; Disinfectants; Drug Combinations; Edetic Acid; Electrochemistry; Epoxy Resins; Equipment Design; Gutta-Percha; Humans; Methenamine; Nickel; Root Canal Filling Materials; Root Canal Irrigants; Root Canal Obturation; Root Canal Preparation; Root Canal Therapy; Silver; Smear Layer; Sodium Hypochlorite; Stainless Steel; Statistics as Topic; Titanium