ranalexin and Staphylococcal-Infections

Cell wall hydrolases (CWH) are enzymes that build, remodel and degrade peptidoglycan within bacterial cell walls and serve essential roles in cell-wall metabolism, bacteriophage adsorption and bacteriolysis, environmental niche expansion, as well as eukaryotic innate immune defense against bacterial infection. Some CWHs, when tested as recombinant purified proteins, have been shown to have bactericidal activities both as single agents and in combinations with other antimicrobials, displaying synergies in vitro and potent activities in animal models of infection greater than the single agents alone. We summarize in vitro, in vivo, and mechanistic studies that illustrate ACWH synergy with antibiotics, antimicrobial peptides, and other ACWHs, underscoring the overall synergistic potential of the ACWH class.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteriocins; Bacteriolysis; Cell Wall; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Synergism; Lysostaphin; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Peptides, Cyclic; Peptidoglycan; Polymyxin B; Staphylococcal Infections; Vancomycin

Here, we demonstrate that antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are an effective antibiofilm treatment when applied as catheter lock solutions (CLSs) against S. aureus biofilm infections. The activity of synthetic AMPs (Bac8c, HB43, P18, Omiganan, WMR, Ranalexin, and Polyphemusin) was measured against early and mature biofilms produced by methicillin-resistant S. aureus and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates from patients with device-related infections grown under in vivo-relevant biofilm conditions. The cytotoxic and hemolytic activities of the AMPs against human cells and their immunomodulatory potential in human blood were also characterized. The D-Bac8c2,5Leu variant emerged as the most effective AMP during in vitro studies and was also highly effective in eradicating S. aureus biofilm infection when used in a CLS rat central venous catheter infection model. These data support the potential use of D-Bac8c2,5Leu, alone or in combination with other AMPs, in the treatment of S. aureus intravenous catheter infections.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Biofilms; Catheter-Related Infections; Cytokines; Disease Models, Animal; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Peptides; Peptides, Cyclic; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Staphylococcal Infections; Vancomycin

To evaluate the in vivo effectiveness of a combination treatment containing ranalexin (a natural antimicrobial peptide) and lysostaphin (an antistaphylococcal endopeptidase) for reducing nasal burden of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).. The community-acquired MRSA strain S. aureus NRS384 (USA300-0114) was used in the present study because it is commonly isolated from human nares and it established consistent and reproducible colonization of cotton rat nares. This model was used to evaluate the efficacy of ranalexin/lysostaphin gels (0.1%-1% w/v; administered intranasally once or once per day for 3 consecutive days) for reducing nasal MRSA burden. Control animals were administered vehicle gel only (0.5% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose) or 2% mupirocin, which is used clinically for nasal decolonization of MRSA. Nasal MRSA burden was assessed at 192 h post-inoculation, which was at least 72 h after the final treatment had been administered. An additional study assessed the efficacy of 0.1% ranalexin/lysostaphin against a mupirocin-resistant MRSA strain (MUP20), which had been selected by serial passage of S. aureus NRS384 through subinhibitory concentrations of mupirocin.. Gels containing 0.1% ranalexin/lysostaphin consistently reduced median nasal burden of MRSA to an extent similar to or greater than 2% mupirocin. Treatment with 0.1% ranalexin/lysostaphin was also effective against the MUP20 strain. There was evidence for only minimal irritancy in cotton rat nares administered three doses of 0.1% ranalexin/lysostaphin, suggesting that this agent is suitable for short-course therapy such as is employed currently for nasal decolonization with mupirocin.. Ranalexin/lysostaphin could serve as an alternative to mupirocin for nasal decolonization of MRSA.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Load; Carrier State; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gels; Lysostaphin; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Models, Animal; Nose; Peptides, Cyclic; Sigmodontinae; Staphylococcal Infections; Treatment Outcome

To characterize the antibacterial synergy of the antimicrobial peptide, ranalexin, used in combination with the anti-staphylococcal endopeptidase, lysostaphin, against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and to assess the combination's potential as a topical disinfectant or decolonizing agent for MRSA. MRSA causes potentially lethal infections, and pre-operative patients colonized with MRSA are often treated with chlorhexidine digluconate and mupirocin cream to eradicate carriage. However, chlorhexidine is unsuitable for some patients, and mupirocin resistance is increasingly encountered, indicating new agents are required.. Using an ex vivo assay, ranalexin and lysostaphin tested in combination reduced viable MRSA on human skin to a greater extent than either compound individually. The combination killed bacteria within 5 min and remained effective and synergistic even in high salt and low pH conditions.. The combination is active against MRSA on human skin and under conditions that may be encountered in sweat.. Although the exact mechanism of activity remains unresolved, considering its specific spectrum of activity, fast killing kinetics and low likelihood of resistance arising, the combination of ranalexin with lysostaphin warrants consideration as a new agent to eradicate nasal and skin carriage of Staph. aureus, including MRSA.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Female; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Lysostaphin; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Peptides, Cyclic; Skin; Staphylococcal Infections

New treatments are urgently required for infections caused by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as these strains are often resistant to multiple conventional antibiotics. Earlier studies showed that ranalexin, an antimicrobial peptide (AMP), in combination with lysostaphin, an antistaphylococcal endopeptidase, synergistically inhibits the growth of MRSA, meaning that it deserved consideration as a new anti-S. aureus therapy. Using haemolysis and Vero cell viability assays, ranalexin with lysostaphin is proven to be non-toxic at antibacterial concentrations. In human serum, ranalexin with lysostaphin is significantly more effective against MRSA than treatment with either component alone. In a rabbit model of wound infection, ranalexin with lysostaphin reduced MRSA in the wound by ca. 3.5log(10) colony-forming units (CFU) compared with the untreated control. The combination is significantly more effective than treatment with ranalexin or lysostaphin alone. In a mouse model of systemic infection, ranalexin with lysostaphin reduced MRSA kidney burden by ca. 1log(10)CFU/g compared with untreated controls or treatment with ranalexin or lysostaphin alone. Importantly, the combination is synergistically bactericidal against various S. aureus isolates in vitro, including those with reduced susceptibility to lysostaphin or vancomycin. Ranalexin and lysostaphin could be incorporated in wound dressings for the prevention and treatment of topical S. aureus infections. That AMPs can enhance the antibacterial effectiveness of lysostaphin in vivo highlights a new avenue of research in the fight against drug-resistant staphylococci.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Chlorocebus aethiops; Colony Count, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epithelial Cells; Erythrocytes; Female; Humans; Kidney; Lysostaphin; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Peptides, Cyclic; Rabbits; Serum Bactericidal Test; Staphylococcal Infections; Vero Cells; Wound Infection

A rat model was used to investigate the efficacy of two polycationic peptides, ranalexin and buforin II, in the prevention of vascular prosthetic graft infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis with intermediate resistance to glycopeptides. The in vitro activity of the peptides was compared with those of vancomycin and teicoplanin by MIC determination and time-kill study. Moreover, the efficacy of collagen-sealed peptide-soaked Dacron was evaluated in a rat model of graft infection. Graft infections were established in the dorsal subcutaneous tissue of 120 adult male Wistar rats. The in vivo study included a control group, one contaminated group that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis and four contaminated groups that received an antibiotic-soaked graft. Experiments demonstrated that the activities of buforin II and ranalexin were greater than those of vancomycin and teicoplanin. Particularly, rats with buforin II-coated Dacron grafts showed no evidence of staphylococcal infection while, for the rats with ranalexin-, vancomycin- and teicoplanin-coated Dacron grafts, the quantitative graft cultures demonstrated bacterial growth (1.9 x 10(2) +/- 0.6 x 10(2) cfu/mL, 6. 2 x 103 +/- 1.9 x 10(3) cfu/mL and 5.1 x 10(4) +/- 4.8 x 10(3) cfu/mL, respectively). The study demonstrated that the use of peptide-soaked Dacron graft can result in significant bacterial growth inhibition and indicates that these compounds may be potentially useful in prosthetic surgery.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Drug Evaluation; Male; Models, Animal; Peptides, Cyclic; Proteins; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus epidermidis

Several polycationic peptides isolated from animals, plants, and bacterial species possess a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity. A rat model was used to investigate the efficacies of two peptides, ranalexin and buforin II, in the prevention of vascular prosthetic graft infections. The effect of peptide-soaked collagen-sealed Dacron was compared to that of rifampin-soaked collagen-sealed Dacron in the rat model of graft infection caused by methicillin-susceptible rifampin-susceptible Staphylococcus epidermidis and methicillin-resistant rifampin-susceptible S. epidermidis. Graft infections were established in the back subcutaneous tissue of 240 adult male Wistar rats by implantation of 1-cm(2) Dacron prostheses, followed by topical inoculation with 2 x 10(7) CFU of S. epidermidis. The study included a control group (no graft contamination), two contaminated groups that did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis, two contaminated groups to which perioperative intraperitoneal cefazolin prophylaxis (30 mg/kg of body weight) was administered, six contaminated groups that received a peptide- or rifampin-soaked graft, and six contaminated groups that received a peptide- or rifampin-soaked graft and perioperative intraperitoneal cefazolin prophylaxis (30 mg/kg). The grafts were sterilely removed 7 days after implantation, and the infection was evaluated by using sonication and quantitative agar culture. Overall, the efficacies of the polycationic peptides against the methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant strains were not significantly different from that of rifampin. Nevertheless, the combinations of ranalexin- and buforin II-coated grafts with cefazolin treatment demonstrated efficacies significantly higher than that of the combination of rifampin-coated grafts and cefazolin treatment against the methicillin-resistant strain.

Topics: Animals; Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Disease Models, Animal; Male; Methicillin Resistance; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Peptides, Cyclic; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Proteins; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus epidermidis; Surgical Wound Infection