ramipril and ST-Elevation-Myocardial-Infarction

ramipril has been researched along with ST-Elevation-Myocardial-Infarction* in 1 studies

Trials

1 trial(s) available for ramipril and ST-Elevation-Myocardial-Infarction

ArticleYear
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan versus Ramipril in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    The American journal of cardiology, 2021, 03-15, Volume: 143

    The role of sacubitril and/or valsartan in patient with heart failure (HF) is established. Whether sacubitril and/or valsartan plays a role in improving outcomes in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown. The current study aims to comparing the efficacy and safety of sacubitril and/or valsartan versus ramipril in post-STEMI patients. Patients presenting with STEMI were randomized to receive either sacubitril and/or valsartan or ramipril after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The main efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days and 6 months, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and HF hospitalizations. Multiple secondary clinical safety and efficacy endpoints were examined. A total of 200 patients were randomized from January 2018 to March 2019, mean age 54.5±10.4, 87% men, 75% presented with anterior wall STEMI. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were comparable between groups. The primary endpoint of MACE was similar with sacubitril/valsartan versus ramipril at 30 days (p = 0.18); however, at 6 months, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with significant reduction of MACE (p = 0.005), mainly driven by reduction in HF hospitalizations (18% vs 36%, OR 0.40, 95% 0.22 to 0.75; p = 0.004). At 6 months, LV ejection fraction was higher with sacubitril/valsartan (46.8±12.5% vs 42.09±13.8%; p = 0.012), with improved LV remodelling (LV end diastolic dimension 50.6±3.9 mm vs 53.2±2.7 mm, p = 0.047; and LV end systolic dimension 36.1±3.4 mm versus 39.9±6.3 mm, p = 0.001) compared with ramipril. No difference in other efficacy or safety clinical endpoints was observed. In conclusion, early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan may offer clinical benefit and improvement in myocardial remodelling in post-STEMI patients.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Diseases; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Ramipril; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke Volume; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan

2021