raltegravir-potassium and Renal-Insufficiency

raltegravir-potassium has been researched along with Renal-Insufficiency* in 4 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for raltegravir-potassium and Renal-Insufficiency

ArticleYear
Comparative Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of HIV-1 Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2017, Volume: 56, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Area Under Curve; Coinfection; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Female; Half-Life; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Liver Failure; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pregnancy; Protein Binding; Pyridones; Quinolones; Raltegravir Potassium; Renal Insufficiency

2017

Trials

2 trial(s) available for raltegravir-potassium and Renal-Insufficiency

ArticleYear
Effects of switching from efavirenz to raltegravir on endothelial function, bone mineral metabolism, inflammation, and renal function: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2013, Nov-01, Volume: 64, Issue:3

    We performed a randomized controlled trial in 30 HIV-infected participants to either continue tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz (Continuation Group) or switch to tenofovir/emtricitabine/raltegravir (Switch Group) for 24 weeks. There were no significant differences in the changes in flow-mediated dilation, 25(OH) vitamin D, or parathyroid hormone levels. Total cholesterol, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, serum alkaline phosphatase, sCD14 levels, and renal function significantly declined in the Switch Group compared with the Continuation Group; however, sCD163 levels significantly increased in the Switch Group. These findings suggest that raltegravir is not inherently more beneficial to endothelial function compared with efavirenz but may impact renal function and monocyte activation.

    Topics: Adenine; Adult; Alkaline Phosphatase; Anti-HIV Agents; Biomarkers; Bone and Bones; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol; Deoxycytidine; Drug Combinations; Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Indiana; Inflammation; Male; Organophosphonates; Oxazines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Renal Insufficiency; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

2013
Lack of a clinically important effect of moderate hepatic insufficiency and severe renal insufficiency on raltegravir pharmacokinetics.
    Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009, Volume: 53, Issue:5

    Raltegravir is a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. Raltegravir is primarily cleared by hepatic metabolism via glucuronidation (via UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1A1), with a minor component of elimination occurring via the renal pathway. Since the potential exists for raltegravir to be administered to patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency, two studies were conducted to evaluate the influence of moderate hepatic insufficiency (assessed by using the Child-Pugh criteria) and severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance, <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir. Study I evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 400 mg raltegravir in eight patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency and eight healthy, matched control subjects. Study II evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 400 mg raltegravir in 10 patients with severe renal insufficiency and 10 healthy, matched control subjects. All participants received a single 400-mg dose of raltegravir in the fasted state. In study I, the geometric mean ratios (GMR; mean value for the group with moderate hepatic insufficiency/mean value for the healthy controls) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), the maximum concentration of drug in plasma (C(max)), and the concentration at 12 h (C(12)) were 0.86 (90% CI, 0.41, 1.77), 0.63 (90% CI, 0.23, 1.70), and 1.26 (90% CI, 0.65, 2.43), respectively. In study II, the GMRs (mean value for the group with renal insufficiency/mean value for the healthy controls) and 90% CIs for AUC(0-infinity), C(max), and C(12) were 0.85 (90% CI, 0.49, 1.49), 0.68 (90% CI, 0.35, 1.32), and 1.28 (90% CI, 0.79, 2.06), respectively. Raltegravir was generally well tolerated by patients with moderate hepatic or severe renal insufficiency, and there was no clinically important effect of moderate hepatic or severe renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir. No adjustment in the dose of raltegravir is required for patients with mild or moderate hepatic or renal insufficiency.

    Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Hepatic Insufficiency; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Renal Insufficiency; Treatment Outcome

2009

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for raltegravir-potassium and Renal-Insufficiency

ArticleYear
Impaired maraviroc and raltegravir clearance in a human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient with end-stage liver disease and renal impairment: a management dilemma.
    Pharmacotherapy, 2012, Volume: 32, Issue:1

    Current product labels for maraviroc and raltegravir provide no dosing guidance for patients with end-stage liver disease and worsening renal function. We describe a 41-year-old man with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and rapidly progressive liver failure and vanishing bile duct syndrome at presentation. Despite discontinuation of all potential offending drugs, the patient's liver function continued to deteriorate. To achieve and maintain HIV suppression while awaiting liver transplantation, a regimen consisting of maraviroc, raltegravir, and enfuvirtide was started. These agents were chosen because the patient was not exposed to them before the onset of liver failure. While receiving product label-recommended twice-daily dosing of these drugs, he achieved and maintained HIV suppression. During a complicated and prolonged hospitalization, the patient also developed renal dysfunction. As hepatic metabolism is the primary route of clearance of maraviroc and raltegravir, we predicted that using approved doses of these drugs could result in significant drug accumulation. Since the safety profiles of supratherapeutic concentrations of these agents are not well defined, we chose to use therapeutic drug monitoring to guide further dosing. The reported concentrations showed severely impaired metabolic clearance of both drugs, with markedly prolonged elimination half-lives of 189 hours for maraviroc and 61 hours for raltegravir. Previously reported half-lives for maraviroc and raltegravir in HIV-infected patients with normal hepatic and renal function are 14-18 hours and 9-12 hours, respectively. Based on these results, the dosing intervals were extended from twice/day to twice/week for maraviroc and every 48 hours for raltegravir. Unfortunately, the patient's clinical condition continued to deteriorate, and he eventually died of complications related to end-stage liver disease. This case illustrates the difficulties in managing antiretroviral therapy in an HIV-infected patient with combined severe liver and renal failure. Prolonged excessively high exposure to maraviroc and raltegravir is likely to result in some level of concentration-dependent toxicity. Until more data are available, therapeutic drug monitoring remains the only evidence-based approach to optimize dosage selection of these drugs in this patient population.

    Topics: Adult; Cyclohexanes; Disease Management; End Stage Liver Disease; Fatal Outcome; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Maraviroc; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Renal Insufficiency; Triazoles

2012