raltegravir-potassium and Hepatitis-C

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are the preferred third agent in first-line antiretroviral therapies. Raltegravir (RAL) was the first INSTI to be approved and used in naïve and experienced patients. Due to its good tolerability and low side effects, RAL has been largely used also in hepatitis coinfected patients. Many years of experience in RAL use now allow literature evidence to be gathered on its safety in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients pre, during and post direct acting agents (DAA) treatment, at all possible stages. In both clinical trials and published case series, RAL has been well tolerated in patients harboring HCV co-infection and also in cirrhotic patients with mild hepatic impairment. Literature data show no major interactions or the need for dose adjustments with any of the DAA currently in use for HCV treatment, or with ribavirine. Hence, RAL can be safely administered during HCV treatment with DAA and may be used as a "temporary" regimen in patients who do not present major integrase-inhibitor mutations. Moreover, its characteristics are also favorable in case of orthotropic liver transplantation, both for the evidence of hepatic safety and for possible co-administration with immunosuppressant agents.

Topics: Coinfection; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Raltegravir Potassium; Time; Treatment Outcome

In this review we will discuss recent findings on the use of inhibitors of the HIV-1 integrase enzyme for the treatment of antiretroviral naive patients. We will also discuss differences between integrase inhibitors, and comment on the use of this class of drugs in the future.. Raltegravir when taken twice daily is as effective and well tolerated as efavirenz. Once daily dosing of raltegravir is virologically inferior to raltegravir taken twice daily. A novel nucleoside-free regimen of raltegravir in combination with a once daily ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor did not produce adequate viral suppression, although raltegravir with a twice daily protease inhibitor yielded better results. Subset analyses have demonstrated a favorable impact of raltegravir on lipid levels and body fat composition. Two once daily integrase inhibitors not yet Food and Drug Administration-approved, elvitegravir and dolutegravir, have completed phase-2 testing and are also virologically noninferior to efavirenz.. Integrase inhibitors provide potent antiretroviral activity, little short-term toxicity and excellent tolerability. For patients with preexisting atherosclerosis or cardiac risk factors this class of therapy is a logical preferred treatment choice. Raltegravir is a preferred option for those in whom therapy for hepatitis C virus infection is anticipated.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coinfection; Hepatitis C; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Quinolones; Raltegravir Potassium; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HLA-DR Antigens; Humans; Lipopolysaccharide Receptors; Neopterin; Raltegravir Potassium; Vietnam

AIDS Clinical Trials Group study A5334s evaluated the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir before and during combined administration of ombitasvir, paritaprevir/ritonavir, plus dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r + DSV) and weight-based ribavirin in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected adults. The pharmacokinetics of OBV/PTV/r + DSV during raltegravir coadministration were also characterized.. Adults living with HIV/HCV coinfection receiving steady-state raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) with 2 nucleos(t)ide analogues were enrolled. Pharmacokinetics of raltegravir were assessed prior to HCV therapy, and 4 weeks later following initiation of OBV/PTV/r (25/150/100 mg) once daily + DSV (250 mg) twice daily. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare the following: raltegravir pharmacokinetics with HCV therapy (week 4) vs before HCV therapy (week 0); OBV/PTV/r and DSV pharmacokinetics vs historical healthy controls; raltegravir pharmacokinetics at week 0 vs historical control adults living with HIV.. Eight of 11 participants had decreased raltegravir exposures after initiation of HCV therapy. The GMRs (90% CI) for maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve of raltegravir with vs without HCV therapy were 0.68 (0.38-1.19) and 0.82 (0.58-1.17), respectively. Comparing OBV/PTV/r pharmacokinetics in healthy controls, A5334s study participants demonstrated generally lower maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve values by 41-82% and 4-73%, respectively. Raltegravir exposures tended to be higher in A5334s study participants compared to adults living with HIV.. The majority of participants' plasma raltegravir exposures were lower after initiation of HCV therapy in coinfected adults; however, confidence intervals were wide.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV-1; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

Elbasvir/grazoprevir is a once-daily fixed-dose combination therapy for the treatment of chronic HCV infection, including HCV/HIV coinfection.. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction of elbasvir and grazoprevir with raltegravir or dolutegravir.. Three open-label trials in healthy adult participants were conducted. In the raltegravir trials, participants received a single dose of raltegravir 400 mg, a single dose of elbasvir 50 mg or grazoprevir 200 mg, and raltegravir with either elbasvir or grazoprevir. In the dolutegravir trial, participants received a single dose of dolutegravir 50 mg alone or co-administered with once-daily elbasvir 50 mg and grazoprevir 200 mg.. The raltegravir AUC0-∞ geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% CI) was 1.02 (0.81-1.27) with elbasvir and 1.43 (0.89-2.30) with grazoprevir. Dolutegravir AUC0-∞ GMR (90% CI) was 1.16 (1.00-1.34) with elbasvir and grazoprevir. The elbasvir AUC0-∞ GMR (90% CI) was 0.81 (0.57-1.17) with raltegravir and 0.98 (0.93-1.04) with dolutegravir. The grazoprevir AUC0-24 GMR (90% CI) was 0.89 (0.72-1.09) with raltegravir and 0.81 (0.67-0.97) with dolutegravir.. Elbasvir or grazoprevir co-administered with raltegravir or dolutegravir resulted in no clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions and was generally well tolerated. These results support the assertion that no dose adjustments for elbasvir, grazoprevir, raltegravir or dolutegravir are needed for co-administration in HCV/HIV-coinfected people.

Topics: Adult; Amides; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antiviral Agents; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Chromatography, Liquid; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hepatitis C; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Middle Aged; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Quinoxalines; Raltegravir Potassium; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Once daily regimens are preferred for HIV-1 treatment, to facilitate adherence and improve quality of life. We compared a new once daily formulation of raltegravir to the currently marketed twice daily formulation.. In this randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3, non-inferiority study, we enrolled participants aged 18 years or older with HIV-1 RNA of 1000 or more copies per mL and no previous antiretroviral treatment at 139 sites worldwide. We randomly assigned participants (2:1) via an interactive voice and web response system to raltegravir 1200 mg (two 600 mg tablets) orally once daily or raltegravir 400 mg (one tablet) orally twice daily, each with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine orally once daily, for up to 96 weeks. A computer-generated allocation schedule stratified randomisation by screening HIV-1 RNA value and co-infection with hepatitis B or C. Participants, sponsor personnel, investigators, and study site personnel involved in the treatment or evaluation of the participants were unaware of the treatment group assignments. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 40 copies per mL at week 48 assessed with the US Food and Drug Administration Snapshot algorithm. Non-inferiority was concluded if the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI was greater than -10%. We assessed efficacy and safety in all participants who received one dose or more of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02131233.. Between May 26, 2014, and Dec 5, 2014, 802 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 533 to once daily treatment and 269 to twice daily; 797 received study therapy, 531 once daily and 266 twice daily. At week 48, 472 (89%) of 531 once daily recipients and 235 (88%) of 266 twice daily recipients achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 40 copies per mL (treatment difference 0·5%, 95% CI -4·2 to 5·2). Drug-related adverse events occurred in 130 (24%) of 531 participants in the once daily group (one of which was serious; none led to treatment discontinuation) and 68 (26%) of 266 participants in the twice daily group (two of which were serious; two led to treatment discontinuation). The most common drug-related adverse events were nausea (39 [7%] vs 18 [7%]), headache (16 [3%] vs 12 [5%]), and dizziness (12 [2%] vs eight [3%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported.. A once daily raltegravir 1200 mg regimen was non-inferior compared with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. These results support the use of raltegravir 1200 mg once daily for first-line therapy.. Merck & Co, Inc.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Biological Availability; Coinfection; Double-Blind Method; Emtricitabine; Female; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Quality of Life; Raltegravir Potassium; RNA, Viral; Tenofovir; Viral Load

Depression is the most common mental health disorder among HIV-infected patients. When treating HIV-infected patients with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), potential drug-drug interactions with antiretroviral agents have to be taken into account. We investigated the two-way pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction and tolerability of concomitant administration of the SSRI citalopram and the HIV-1 integrase inhibitor raltegravir in healthy volunteers.. An open-label, crossover, two-period trial was conducted in 24 healthy volunteers. Subjects received the following treatments: citalopram 20 mg once daily for 2 weeks followed by the combination with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 5 days and after a washout period raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 5 days. Intensive steady-state pharmacokinetic blood sampling was performed. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the combination versus the reference treatment and 90% CIs were calculated for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). CYP2C19 genotyping was performed because it influences N-demethylation of citalopram to desmethylcitalopram.. A total of 22 healthy volunteers completed the trial. GMRs (90% CI) were 1.00 (0.98, 1.03) for citalopram AUC0-24 h, 0.99 (0.88, 1.12) for desmethylcitalopram AUC0-24 h and 0.77 (0.50, 1.19) for raltegravir AUC0-12 h. Raltegravir plasma concentration 12 h after intake (C12 h) did not change with concomitant use of citalopram. Within each CYP2C19 phenotype subgroup the citalopram metabolite-to-parent ratio, which is a measure for metabolic enzyme activity, was not influenced by concomitant raltegravir use.. Raltegravir does not influence the pharmacokinetics of citalopram and desmethylcitalopram. Citalopram did not change the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir in a clinically meaningful way. The combination was well tolerated and can be administered without dose adjustments. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01978782.

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Citalopram; Cross-Over Studies; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Drug Interactions; Female; Genotype; Half-Life; Hepatitis C; Humans; Male; Phenotype; Raltegravir Potassium; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Young Adult

To describe raltegravir pharmacokinetics at steady-state in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients under antiretroviral (ARV) treatment with (n = 5) and without (n = 5) advanced liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh C).. This was a non-randomized, Phase I, parallel-assignment, open-label pharmacokinetic study in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with Child-Pugh grade C hepatic cirrhosis. We recruited clinically stable HIV/HCV-coinfected adult patients with controlled HIV viraemia (<50 copies/mL) for at least 6 months. Raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) was added under fasting conditions for 5 days to the successful ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based ARV regimen. The trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT01289951) (LIVERAL).. Raltegravir AUC0-12 and C12 were increased 1.72-fold (90% CI, 1.02 to 2.92) and 6.58-fold (90% CI, 2.92 to14.85), respectively, in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis. No safety issues were identified and raltegravir was well tolerated by all patients.. Raltegravir plasma levels are increased in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with advanced liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh C). Despite the higher exposure, raltegravir was safe and well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium

The aim was to examine the long-term safety and efficacy of raltegravir in patients with HIV-1 and hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection in three double-blind, randomized, controlled Phase III studies.. In STARTMRK, treatment-naïve patients received raltegravir 400 mg twice a day (bid) or efavirenz 600 mg at bedtime, both with tenofovir/emtricitabine. In BENCHMRK-1 and -2, highly treatment-experienced patients with multi-drug resistant virus and prior treatment failure received raltegravir 400 mg bid or placebo, both with optimized background therapy. Patients with chronic HBV and/or HCV coinfection were enrolled if baseline liver function tests were ≤5 times the upper limit of normal. HBV infection was defined as HBV surface antigen positivity for all studies; HCV infection was defined as HCV RNA positivity for STARTMRK and HCV antibody positivity for BENCHMRK.. Hepatitis coinfection was present in 6% (34 of 563) of treatment-naïve patients (4% HBV only, 2% HCV only and 0.2% HBV+HCV) and 16% (114 of 699) of treatment-experienced patients (6% HBV only, 9% HCV only and 1% HBV+HCV). The incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar in raltegravir recipients with and without hepatitis coinfection in both STARTMRK (50 vs. 47%) and BENCHMRK (34 vs. 38.5%). Grade 2-4 liver enzyme elevations were more frequent in coinfected vs. monoinfected patients, but were not different between the raltegravir and control groups. At week 96, the proportion of raltegravir recipients with HIV RNA <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL was similar between coinfected and monoinfected patients (93 vs. 90% in STARTMRK; 63 vs. 61% in BENCHMRK).. Raltegravir was generally well tolerated and efficacious up to 96 weeks in HIV-infected patients with HBV/HCV coinfection.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antiviral Agents; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Polyethylene Glycols; Proline; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Recombinant Proteins; Ribavirin

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-HIV Agents; Coinfection; Comorbidity; Darunavir; Female; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Retrospective Studies; Spain; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a single-strand RNA virus that infects millions of people worldwide. Recent advances in therapy have led to viral cure using two- and three- drug combinations of direct acting inhibitors of viral replication. CCR5 is a chemokine receptor that is expressed on hepatocytes and represents a key co-receptor for HIV. We evaluated the effect of CCR5 blockade or knockdown on HCV replication in Huh7.5JFH1 cells.. Cells were exposed to varying concentrations of maraviroc (CCR5 inhibitor), cenicriviroc (CCR2/CCR5 inhibitor), sofosbuvir (nucleotide polymerase inhibitor), or raltegravir (HIV integrase inhibitor).. HCV RNA was detected utilizing two qualitative strand-specific RT-PCR assays. HCV core antigen and NS3 protein was quantified in the supernatant and cell lysate, respectively. siRNA was utilized to knockdown CCR5 gene expression in hepatocytes. Alternatively, anti-CCR5 antibodies were employed to block the receptor. Supernatant levels of HCV RNA (expressed as fold change) were not reduced in the presence of raltegravir but were reduced 8.55-fold and 12.42-fold with cenicriviroc and maraviroc, respectively. Sofosbuvir resulted in a 16.20-fold change in HCV RNA levels. HCV core and NS3 protein production was also reduced in a dose-dependent manner. Two distinct anti-CCR5 antibodies also resulted in a significant reduction in HCV protein expression, as did siRNA knockdown of CCR5 gene expression.. These data provide evidence that CCR5 modulation could have a significant effect on HCV replication in an in vitro system. Further evaluation of the role of CCR5 inhibition in clinical settings may be warranted.

Topics: CCR5 Receptor Antagonists; Cell Line; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatocytes; Humans; Imidazoles; Maraviroc; Raltegravir Potassium; Receptors, CCR5; Sofosbuvir; Sulfoxides; Virus Replication

Topics: Accidents, Occupational; Acute Disease; Delayed Diagnosis; Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; Expert Testimony; Follow-Up Studies; Germany; Heart Valves; Hepatitis C; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional; Liver Function Tests; Male; Needlestick Injuries; Occupational Diseases; Physician Assistants; Raltegravir Potassium; Suture Techniques

Although different factors have been implicated in the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio recovery in HIV-infected patients who receive effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), limited information exists on the influence of the regimen composition. A longitudinal study carried out in a prospective, single-center cohort of HIV-infected patients. ART regimens including non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), protease inhibitors (PI), or integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) from patients who achieved long-term (≥6-month duration) virological suppression (HIV-RNA < 400 copies/mL) from January 1998 to June 2014 were analyzed. The impact of ART composition on the changes of the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio was modeled using a mixed linear approach with adjustment for possible confounders. A total of 1068 ART regimens from 570 patients were analyzed. Mean (SD) age of the patients was 42.15 (10.68) years and 276 (48.42%) had hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection. Five hundred fifty-eight (52.25%) regimens were PI-based, 439 (40.10%) NNRTI-based, and 71 (6.65%) INSTI-based; 487 (45.60%) were initial regimens, 476 (44.57%) simplification, and 105 (9.83%) salvage regimens. Median (IQR) number of regimens was 1 (1-2) per patient, of 29 (14-58) months duration, and 4 (3-7) CD4/CD8 measurements per regimen. The median baseline CD4/CD8 ratio was 0.42, 0.50, and 0.54, respectively, with the PI-, NNRTI-, and INSTI-based regimens (P = 0.0073). Overall median (IQR) increase of CD4/CD8 ratio was 0.0245 (-0.0352-0.0690) per year, and a CD4/CD8 ratio ≥1 was achieved in 19.35% of the cases with PI-based, 25.97% with NNRTI-based, and 22.54% with INSTI-based regimens (P = 0.1406). In the adjusted model, the mean CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio increase was higher with NNRTI-based regimens compared for PI-based (estimated coefficient for PI [95% CI], -0.0912 [-0.1604 to -0.0219], P = 0.009). Also, a higher CD4/CD8 baseline ratio was associated with higher CD4/CD8 increase in the adjusted model (P = 0.001); by contrast, higher age (P = 0.020) and simplification of ART regimen (P = 0.003) had a negative impact on the CD4/CD8 ratio. Antiretroviral regimen composition has a differential impact on the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio; NNRTI-based regimens are associated with enhanced CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio recovery compared to PI-based antiretroviral regimens.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Alkynes; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; CD4-CD8 Ratio; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Interferon Type I; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Raltegravir Potassium; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ribavirin; Ritonavir

The relationship between hepatic tolerance and hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection has not been extensively studied in clinical practice. We assessed the efficacy and safety of raltegravir-based therapy in an Italian cohort of HIV/HCV co-infected patients. One hundred and forty patients with HIV/HCV co-infection initiating raltegravir from SCOLTA project (Surveillance Cohort Long-Term Toxicity Antiretrovirals) were examined. Of them, 43 were women, with mean age of 45.4±6.4years; 65 (46%) had undetectable HIV-RNA<50copies/mL and 75 (54%) HIV-RNA≥50copies/mL. According to CDC classification, 49 (35%) were in stage C. Based on Fib4 score at the time of starting raltegravir, patients were classified in class I in 41 cases, class II in 68 and in class III in 31 cases. Globally, the Fib4 score slightly decreased during 24months follow-up, from 2.2 to a value of 1.8. Hepatic adverse events of any grade were observed in 67 patients, of which only 2 cases (3%) had severe liver toxicity (grade 3-4). Only one patient had to discontinue the therapy because of adverse events. According to univariate analysis, being in CDC stage C represented a risk for the development of liver toxicity, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.27 (95% CI 1.06-4.84, P=0.033). None of the other variables considered (age, sex, years since detection of HIV and HCV-RNA detectable, years of previous HIV therapy, concomitant therapy with PI or NRTI, CD4+ cell count, Fib4, and transaminases level at baseline) resulted statistically correlated to the outcome. In conclusion, raltegravir-based regimens can be safely used in HCV infected patients; in this study, the hepatic toxicity has been found to be more frequent in patients with an advanced HIV disease (CDC stage C), independently of HIV-RNA suppression at raltegravir initiation.

Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Cohort Studies; Coinfection; Demography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; RNA, Viral

The objective of the study was to assess plasma concentrations of efavirenz, darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus (HIV-HCV)-coinfection without liver cirrhosis.. In this observational, open-label study, adult HIV-infected outpatients treated with tenofovir/emtricitabine plus efavirenz (600 mg daily), darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg daily) or raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) for at least 4 weeks were asked to participate. Subjects with liver cirrhosis were excluded. The trough concentration (C trough) of darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir and the mid-dose concentration (C12h) of efavirenz were assessed at steady state by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-tandem mass spectrometry method.. A total of 96 HIV-positive patients were enrolled into the study. Thirty-four patients were treated with efavirenz, 33 with darunavir/ritonavir and 29 with raltegravir. The geometric mean plasma C trough [coefficient of variation (%)] of darunavir was comparable between HIV+/HCV+ and HIV+/HCV- subjects: 2644 ng/ml (155%) and 2491 ng/ml (139%), respectively (geometric mean ratio (GMR) = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.79-1.56; p = 0.69). These values were comparable for raltegravir: 108 ng/ml (149%) in the HIV+/HCV+ group and 96 ng/ml (161%) in the HIV+/HCV- group (GMR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.61-1.44; p = 0.72). On the contrary, the geometric mean plasma C12h of efavirenz was significantly higher among the 15 HIV+/HCV+ patients (1915 ng/ml, 159%) than among the 19 HIV+/HCV- patients (1505 ng/ml, 167%; GMR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.19-1.71; p = 0.009).. The mean plasma concentration of efavirenz was significantly higher in HCV-positive than in HCV-negative patients without liver cirrhosis, while the mean plasma levels of darunavir/ritonavir and raltegravir were comparable in both groups.

Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Analysis of Variance; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir

Topics: Adult; AIDS Serodiagnosis; Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination; Health Personnel; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; Humans; Male; Needlestick Injuries; Raltegravir Potassium

Potential liver toxicity is an important consideration for antiretroviral selection among patients coinfected with HIV and viral hepatitis (B and/or C). We sought to describe the hepatic safety profile of raltegravir in this population.. Using data from HIV clinical cohorts at Johns Hopkins University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, we evaluated factors associated with liver enzyme elevations (LEEs) and calculated adverse event incidence rates for patients initiated on raltegravir-containing regimens prior to 1 January 2010. LEEs were graded according to Division of AIDS definitions.. During the study period, 456 patients received raltegravir - of whom 36% were hepatitis-coinfected (138 HCV, 17 HBV, 11 HBV+HCV). Coinfected patients were more likely to have baseline abnormal LEEs and developed severe (grade 3-4) LEEs at a rate 3.4× that of HIV-monoinfected patients (95% CI 1.28, 9.61). Among all participants, the incidence rate for first occurrence of severe LEEs was 5 per 100 person-years (95% CI 3, 7). In adjusted analyses, coinfected patients had a 2.7-fold increased hazard of severe LEEs (95% CI 1.03, 7.04). 60% of severe abnormalities occurred within 6 months after starting raltegravir; the drug was discontinued in 3 (1.3%) coinfected patients and 18 (6.2%) monoinfected patients.. Compared with HIV-monoinfected patients, those with HIV-hepatitis coinfection are at increased hazard of developing LEEs on raltegravir, at a level similar to other antiretrovirals. Severe events were uncommon, rarely leading to raltegravir discontinuation. With appropriate monitoring, raltegravir-based therapy is safe in hepatitis-coinfected patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-HIV Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Coinfection; Female; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Young Adult

Raltegravir is a switch option for HIV/HCV co-infected individuals due to its hepatic neutral profile. We evaluated the effect of a switch to Raltegravir from other antiretroviral agents in HIV and HCV-co-infected individuals naïve to HCV therapy.. Observational, single-centre study. Data on alanine aminotransferase levels, HCV-VL, CD4 cell count, HIV viral load levels and hepatic fibrosis score were collated six months pre-switch, at the time of switch and six months post switch to Raltegravir therapy. Results were compared utilizing the Kruskal-Wallis test.. Twenty-seven individuals were identified. Median age was 43 years, median duration of HIV infection was 7 years and median documented period of HCV infection at the time of switch was 26 months. A sustained improvement in ALT levels was observed. Median ALT levels were 254 IU/L at the time of switch, decreasing significantly to 176 IU/L, (p = 0.0226) and 90 IU/L (p = 0.0138) 1 month post switch and 6 months post switch respectively. The median Hepatitis C viral load level at the time of the switch was 341,783 copies/mL, which decreased to 224,066 copies/mL 6 months after switch (p = 0.04).. A switch to Raltegravir in individuals with HIV/HCV co-infection was effective in maintaining HIV virological suppression with improvement in drug-associated hepatotoxicity as measured by ALT.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Antiviral Agents; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Coinfection; Female; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Retrospective Studies; Viral Load

Liver enzyme elevations (LEE) were investigated in 2717 episodes of initiation of antiretroviral therapy since January 2010 in 1982 HIV patients. Serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA was positive in 24%. Any grade of LEE was recognized in 9% of episodes, being 6% in HCV-negative and 17% in HCV-positive patients (P < 0.001). Grades 3-4 LEE only occurred in 0.4% of patients. Overall, LEE were more frequent with ritonavir-boosted darunavir and atazanavir than with raltegravir and etravirine.

Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; Darunavir; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver; Male; Nevirapine; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Ritonavir; Sulfonamides

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Area Under Curve; Drug Interactions; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; HIV Infections; Humans; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Acyclovir; Anti-HIV Agents; Circumcision, Male; Cyclohexanes; Dideoxynucleosides; Drug Interactions; Female; Hepatitis C; HIV Fusion Inhibitors; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Maraviroc; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Nitriles; Organic Chemicals; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Pyrrolidinones; Raltegravir Potassium; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Triazoles