raffinose and Constriction--Pathologic

Topics: Adenosine; Adult; Allopurinol; Cholestasis; Constriction, Pathologic; Glutathione; Humans; Insulin; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Organ Preservation Solutions; Postoperative Complications; Raffinose; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors

This study compares biliary complication rates associated with use of two different preservative solutions, Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate (HTK) and University of Wisconsin (UW), utilized in orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) with donations after cardiac death (DCDs).. Between 1997-2010, we retrospectively studied 35 LTs performed utilizing DCD donors, preserved either with HTK (n=17) or UW(n=18). Biliary complications were defined by the presence of anastomotic strictures, non-anastomotic strictures, and/or biliary leak on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.. HTK and UW cohorts were similar in terms of demographics as well as pre- and post-operative biochemical profile. Donor age was significantly higher among HTK compared to UW recipients (41.5 ± 11.9 vs. 26.2 ± 8.8 years, p<0.001). The incidence of post-LT biliary complications was higher in the HTK group (76% vs. 39% in UW group, p=0.041). Hepatic arterial thrombosis (HAT) was observed among 3 HTK patients (17.7%) and 1 UW patient (5.6%), p=0.33. No patients underwent retransplantation in UW group, five recipients in HTK group underwent retransplantation (29%), p=0.019; 4 due to biliary complications and 1 due to HAT.. This single-center study reveals that the use of HTK preservative among DCD donors is associated with an increased risk of biliary complications. Multicenter retrospective studies are suggested to further verify this observation.

Topics: Adenosine; Adult; Allopurinol; Anastomosis, Surgical; Anastomotic Leak; Biliary Tract; Constriction, Pathologic; Female; Glucose; Glutathione; Hepatic Artery; Humans; Insulin; Liver Transplantation; Male; Mannitol; Middle Aged; Organ Preservation Solutions; Postoperative Complications; Potassium Chloride; Procaine; Raffinose; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Thrombosis; Tissue Donors

The development of biliary strictures (BSs) after liver transplantation (LT) continues to affect 10% to 30% of patients, causing substantial morbidity. The cause of BSs is multifactorial, including technical, immune, and, in particular, ischemic factors. The importance of adequate flushing of the peribiliary arterial tree has been stressed. We hypothesized that high-viscosity (HV) preservation solutions in the donor do not completely flush the small donor peribiliary plexus, leading to inadequate preservation of the bile ducts and posttransplant BSs. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively compared the incidence of BSs in 2 groups of adults undergoing LT using different types of aortic preservation solution in the donor: group 1 (n = 24), low-viscosity (LV) Marshall solution; and group 2 (n = 27), HV University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. All donors in both groups received additional portal flushes with UW. All LTs were performed between November 1995 and August 1998 at 2 centers by the same surgeon, eliminating a technical bias. Terminal duct-to-duct anastomosis was performed in all recipients except 1 patient in group 1, who underwent a bile duct-to-jejunum anastomosis. BSs were first suspected on clinical and biochemical grounds and then confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Identical medical protocols were used in all patients. One-year patient survival rates in groups 1 and 2 were 92% and 100%, respectively (P =.9). One-year graft survival was identical to patient survival. The incidence of BSs in group 1 was 4.1% (1 of 24 patients), compared to 29.7% in group 2 (8 of 27 patients; P =.02). The BS in group 1 occurred 4 months post-LT and was anastomotic. BSs in group 2 occurred between 1 and 12 months post-LT and were anastomotic, extrahepatic, intrahepatic, or combined intrahepatic and extrahepatic. There were no significant differences in the following factors between groups 1 and 2: donor age, local versus imported liver, split-liver or full-liver transplantation, incidence of multiple vessels in the donor liver, indications for LT, recipient age, T-tube versus no T-tube, post-LT peak aspartate aminotransferase level, and treatment for rejection. There was no hepatic artery thrombosis or primary nonfunction in either group. Interestingly, cold ischemia time (CIT) was longer in group 1, which had the least incidence of BSs (692 +/- 190 v 535 +/- 129 minutes in group 2; P =.001). Follow-up was longer in group 1 (28.9 +/- 8.

Topics: Adenosine; Adult; Allopurinol; Aorta; Biliary Tract; Cold Temperature; Constriction, Pathologic; Glutathione; Graft Survival; Humans; Hypertonic Solutions; Insulin; Ischemia; Liver Transplantation; Middle Aged; Organ Preservation; Organ Preservation Solutions; Raffinose; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Tissue Donors; Viscosity