racivir and Hepatitis-B--Chronic

The aim of our study was to compare the performances of two new hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA assays, a cross-linking assay (NAXCOR) and a hybrid-capture amplification assay (Digene), versus the widely used branched-DNA (bDNA) assay (Chiron) in the monitoring of HBV DNA levels during antiviral treatment. Serial serum samples from 12 chronically HBV infected patients undergoing a phase II trial of an antiviral drug, 2',3'-dideoxy-5-fluoro-3'-thiacytidine (FTC), were studied. A total of 96 serum samples were tested for HBV DNA using the cross-linking, hybrid-capture amplification, and bDNA assays. In the comparison of the cross-linking and bDNA assays, concordant results were found in 77 (80.3%) samples, no significant difference was found between the median log(10) HBV DNA levels (6.66 versus 7. 17 meq/ml), and the results of the two assays were closely correlated (r = 0.95). In the comparison of the hybrid-capture amplification and bDNA assays, concordant results were found in 79 (82.3%) samples, no significant difference was found between the median log(10) HBV DNA levels (6.98 versus 6.99 meq/ml), and the results of the two assays were closely correlated (r = 0.99). Six (6. 3%) samples by the cross-linking assay and 10 (10.4%) samples by the bDNA assay required retesting because of unacceptably high within-run coefficients of variance. No sample required retesting in the hybrid-capture amplification assay according to the internal validation. In conclusion, the cross-linking and hybrid-capture amplification assays were as sensitive as the bDNA assay for HBV DNA detection and can be recommended for monitoring of HBV DNA levels during antiviral treatment.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; DNA, Viral; Emtricitabine; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Nucleic Acid Hybridization; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Zalcitabine