quinupristin-dalfopristin and Soft-Tissue-Infections

quinupristin-dalfopristin has been researched along with Soft-Tissue-Infections* in 2 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for quinupristin-dalfopristin and Soft-Tissue-Infections

ArticleYear
Novel antibacterial agents for skin and skin structure infections.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2004, Volume: 50, Issue:3

    With the continuing development of clinical drug resistance among bacteria and the advent of resistance to the recently released agents quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid, the need for new, effective agents to treat multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections remains important. With treatment options limited, it has become critical to identify antibiotics with novel mechanisms of activity. Several new drugs have emerged as possible therapeutic alternatives. This review focuses on agents newly introduced and those presently in clinical development for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and daptomycin have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Two newer compounds, oritavancin and dalbavancin, are in clinical development for this indication. In addition, the quinolones moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin recently were approved for cutaneous infections.. At the conclusion of this learning activity, participants should be familiar with the modes of action, clinical indications, dosage regimens, and contraindications and cautions for several novel antibacterial agents for skin and skin structure infections.

    Topics: Acetamides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Daptomycin; Humans; Linezolid; Oxazolidinones; Quinolones; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Soft Tissue Infections; Virginiamycin

2004

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for quinupristin-dalfopristin and Soft-Tissue-Infections

ArticleYear
[Value of Synercid in clinical practice: from temporary approval to clinical trial authorization].
    Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983), 2001, Sep-08, Volume: 30, Issue:25 Pt 2

    NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA DUE TO GRAM-POSITIVE COCCI: In a randomized multicentric trial comparing Synercid with vancomycin, the cure rate (56.3% vs 58.3%) were equivalent in the 2 treatment arms. Treatment failures were also similar: 44% vs 42%. Mortality (25% vs 22%) was likewise comparable, as was tolerance. SKIN AND SOFT TISSUE INFECTIONS: For erysipela, infections requiring surgical dissection, post-trauma infections, postoperative wound infections, or diabetes-related infections, the rate of success obtained in 2 open randomized comparative multicentric trials was equivalent in the 2 treatment arms: 68.2% for Syncercid, 70.7% for the compared treatments. EMERGENCY PRESCRIPTION: For E. faecium, the success rate was 74% based on clinical assessment and 70.5% based on bacteriological assessment. For meti-S S. aureus infections, the clinical success rate was 74% for all patients and 80% for bacteriologically evaluable patients; the bacteriological success rate was 74% and 71% respectively. In case of infection due to C-MLSB meti-R S. aureus, the percentage of clinical success was 89% for bacteriologically evaluable patients.

    Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cross Infection; Drug Approval; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Cocci; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pneumonia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Soft Tissue Infections; Virginiamycin

2001