quetiapine-fumarate and Fibromyalgia

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Depression; Fibromyalgia; Humans; Pain; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Sleep Wake Disorders; Weight Gain

This review is one of a series on drugs used to treat fibromyalgia. Fibromyalgia is a clinically well-defined chronic condition of unknown aetiology characterised by chronic widespread pain that often co-exists with sleep problems and fatigue. It affects approximately 2% of the general population. Up to 70% of patients with fibromyalgia meet the criteria for a depressive or anxiety disorder. People often report high disability levels and poor health-related quality of life. Drug therapy focuses on reducing key symptoms and disability, and improving health-related quality of life. Antipsychotics might reduce fibromyalgia and associated mental health symptoms.. To assess the efficacy, tolerability and safety of antipsychotics in fibromyalgia in adults.. We searched CENTRAL (2016, Issue 4), MEDLINE and EMBASE to 20 May 2016, together with reference lists of retrieved papers and reviews and two clinical trial registries. We also contacted trial authors.. We selected controlled trials of at least four weeks duration of any formulation of antipsychotics used for the treatment of fibromyalgia in adults.. We extracted the data from all included studies and two review authors independently assessed study risks of bias. We resolved discrepancies by discussion. We performed analysis using three tiers of evidence. We derived first tier evidence from data meeting current best standards and subject to minimal risk of bias (outcome equivalent to substantial pain intensity reduction, intention-to-treat analysis without imputation for drop-outs, at least 200 participants in the comparison, eight to 12 weeks duration, parallel design), second tier evidence from data that failed to meet one or more of these criteria and that we considered at some risk of bias but with adequate numbers in the comparison, and third tier evidence from data involving small numbers of participants that we considered very likely to be biased or used outcomes of limited clinical utility, or both. We rated the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.. We included a total of four studies with 296 participants.Three studies with 206 participants compared quetiapine, an atypical (second-generation) antipsychotic, with placebo. One study used a cross-over design and two studies a parallel-group design. Study duration was eight or 12 weeks. Quetiapine was used in all studies with a bedtime dosage between 50 and 300 mg/day. All studies had one or more sources of potential major bias and we judged them to be at moderate risk of bias overall. The primary outcomes in this review were participant-reported pain relief of 50% or greater, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) much or very much improved, withdrawal due to adverse events (tolerability) and serious adverse events (safety).Second tier evidence indicated that quetiapine was not statistically superior to placebo in the number of participants with a 50% or more pain reduction (very low quality evidence). No study reported data on PGIC. A greater proportion of participants on quetiapine reported a 30% or more pain reduction (risk difference (RD) 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 0.23; number needed to treat for an additional benefit (NNTB) 8, 95% CI 5 to 100) (very low quality evidence). A greater proportion of participants on quetiapine reported a clinically relevant improvement of health-related quality of life compared to placebo ( RD 0.18, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.31; NNTB 5, 95% CI 3 to 20) (very low quality evidence). Quetiapine was statistically superior to placebo in reducing sleep problems (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.67, 95% CI -1.10 to -0.23), depression (SMD -0.39, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.04) and anxiety (SMD -0.40, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.11) (very low quality evidence). Quetiapine was statistically superior to placebo in reducing the risk of withdrawing from the study due to a lack of efficacy (RD -0.14, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.05) (very low quality evidence). There was no statistically significant difference between quetiapine and placebo in the proportion of participants withdrawing due to adverse events (tolerability) (very low quality evidence), in the frequency of serious adverse events (safety) (very low quality evidence) and in the proportion of participants reporting dizziness and somnolence as an adverse event (very low quality evidence). In more participants in the quetiapine group a substantial weight gain was noted (RD 0.08, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.15; number needed to treat for an additional harm (NNTH) 12, 95% CI 6 to 50) (very low qu. Very low quality evidence suggests that quetiapine may be considered for a time-limited trial (4 to 12 weeks) to reduce pain, sleep problems, depression and anxiety in fibromyalgia patients with major depression. Potential side effects such as weight gain should be balanced against the potential benefits in shared decision making with the patient.

Topics: Adult; Amitriptyline; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Antipsychotic Agents; Fibromyalgia; Humans; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sleep Wake Disorders

The treatment of fibromyalgia requires pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies. The pharmacological treatment of fibromyalgia is limited to a few drugs that have been demonstrated to be moderately effective in some but not all dimensions of the disease. Therefore, the search for new drugs to treat this condition is warranted. Atypical antipsychotics offered an attractive alternative because they had been shown to be active against several key symptoms of fibromyalgia. The results of open-label studies, however, appear to indicate that atypical antipsychotics are poorly tolerated in patients with fibromyalgia, and only quetiapine XR has been studied in randomized controlled trials. Quetiapine XR has demonstrated effectiveness in treating comorbid major depression, anxiety and sleep disturbance. However, in two randomized controlled trials, quetiapine XR was not differentiated from placebo and failed to demonstrate noninferiority to amitriptyline in terms of improving overall symptomatology. The effect of quetiapine XR on pain and its usefulness as part of a combination pharmacological regimen should be further evaluated. Overall, the use of quetiapine (initiated at a low dose and slowly titrated) in fibromyalgia should be limited to patients with comorbid major depression or patients who are currently receiving other treatments and have unresolved and disabling depressive and/or anxiety symptoms.

Topics: Amisulpride; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Benzodiazepines; Comorbidity; Depression; Dibenzothiazepines; Fibromyalgia; Humans; Olanzapine; Patient Selection; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Sulpiride; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

Previous open-label studies have suggested that quetiapine could be a valuable alternative for treating fibromyalgia.. This study aims to compare the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release quetiapine with amitriptyline for treating fibromyalgia.. This study was a randomized, open-label, flexible-dose, non-inferiority trial. Patients with fibromyalgia were randomized to receive quetiapine extended-release (XR) (N = 45) (50 to 300 mg daily) or amitriptyline (N = 45) (10 to 75 mg daily) for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to endpoint in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) total score; the non-inferiority threshold was established at 8 points. The secondary outcomes included sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and quality of life.. Twenty-two (49%) patients in the quetiapine group and 34 (76%) patients in the amitriptyline group completed the study. We found a reduction of 9.8 points in the total FIQ score at the endpoint for the quetiapine-treated patients compared to 13.9 points for the amitriptyline-treated patients, for a difference of 4.14 points (80% confidence interval (CI) -0.70 to 8.98). No significant differences were found between the quetiapine XR and amitriptyline groups for any of the secondary outcomes. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events was higher in the quetiapine group (n = 14, 31.1%) than the amitriptyline group (n = 3, 6.6%).. Our results appear to indicate that quetiapine XR does not provide similar efficacy to amitriptyline for treating patients with fibromyalgia. Quetiapine XR had a worse tolerability than amitriptyline in this population, possibly due to a relatively high starting dose.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amitriptyline; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Anxiety; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depression; Dibenzothiazepines; Fibromyalgia; Humans; Middle Aged; Psychotropic Drugs; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Sleep; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Fibromyalgia and major depressive disorder (MDD) frequently co-occur. Quetiapine fumarate extended-release (quetiapine XR) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of MDD and has been shown to have analgesic properties in patients with depression. The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of quetiapine XR on depressive and pain symptoms in patients with MDD and comorbid fibromyalgia, and to assess its safety and tolerability.. This was an 8-week, single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 120 nonpsychotic adult outpatients who fulfilled the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition diagnostic criteria for MDD and whose diagnosis of fibromyalgia was confirmed according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria were enrolled. The primary end point was the mean change from baseline to week 8 on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating (HAM-D) scale. Secondary end points included other depression-rating scores, pain scores, fibromyalgia scores, measures of quality of life and global functioning, and adverse events.. The mean change in the HAM-D score from baseline to week 8 was significantly greater in the quetiapine XR group compared with the placebo group (-10.0 versus -5.8; P = 0.001). Improvements in most secondary outcomes were also significantly greater in the quetiapine XR group. Quetiapine XR was generally well tolerated.. This study is the first to demonstrate that measures of depression, pain, and quality of life are significantly improved with quetiapine XR compared with placebo in patients with a dual diagnosis of MDD and fibromyalgia.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Comorbidity; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fibromyalgia; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Patient Safety; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Recently, second-generation antipsychotic drugs have attracted interest in the treatment of chronic pain, including fibromyalgia (FM). Preliminary uncontrolled studies have shown that quetiapine treatment may be helpful for FM patients. In this trial, we sought to examine-for the first time-the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine as a treatment for FM and its associated psychiatric symptoms. This was a 12-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of quetiapine XR as an add-on treatment for FM syndrome. Fifty-one female FM patients were randomized, and a flexible dosage of 50 to 300 mg/d was used. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to end point in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire total score. Secondary outcomes included mood symptoms, sleep disturbances, and tender points. Using a low dose (mean = 132.2 mg) of quetiapine, we observed significant benefits of drug treatment on sleep, uncertain effects on FM and mood symptoms, but no effects on pain, in a small group of polymedicated FM patients. Quetiapine was generally well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Affect; Antipsychotic Agents; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fibromyalgia; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Quetiapine Fumarate; Sleep Wake Disorders; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this exploratory study was to systematically assess the potential effectiveness and tolerability of quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic, for the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia. This was a unicentre, open-label study conducted in thirty-five outpatients, 18 years or older, who met the ACR criteria for fibromyalgia and who had not satisfactorily responded to their previous fibromyalgia treatment. Quetiapine, flexibly dosed (25-100 mg/day), was added to their original treatment regimen for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the mean change from baseline to endpoint in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) total score. Secondary efficacy measures included mean changes from baseline to endpoint in the scores of the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Severity scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and individual items of the FIQ. Thirty (85.7%) patients (mean age 47+/-7.9, 93.3% females) had a postbaseline evaluation and constituted the intent-to-treat efficacy sample. Mean FIQ total score decreased significantly by 10.2 points from a baseline of 63.2 to 53.0 at study endpoint (p<0.001). A statistically significant reduction was observed in FIQ stiffness and FIQ fatigue subscores but not in FIQ pain subscore. Large effect sizes were observed for the FIQ total (1.04), CGI-severity (1.00) and PSQI (1.07), while moderate effect sizes (i.e.> or =0.50) were encountered in the FIQ fatigue, FIQ stiffness and SF-12 mental component summary. Quetiapine was safely administered and well tolerated. Despite the lack of effect on pain, the significant and relevant improvement in overall efficacy measures and quality of life suggests that quetiapine may be a valuable drug for treatment of patients with fibromyalgia that should be further tested in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Fibromyalgia; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Sleep Wake Disorders

Quetiapine has been shown to improve fibromyalgia symptoms, especially sleep disturbance, fatigue, morning stiffness, and mental well-being, but lacks an effect on pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if pregabalin, which has shown antialgic activity in fibromyalgia, added to quetiapine treatment additionally improved fibromyalgia symptomatology.. This was an open-label, 12-week study. Pregabalin was administered to 19 female fibromyalgia patients at a starting dose of 75 mg/day subsequently adjusted in according to the drug's efficacy and tolerability. Outcome measures included the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Beck Depression Inventory, the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the SF-12 Health Survey.. Data analysis was done on the Intention-To-Treat sample which included 18 patients. Pregabalin significantly improved the pain and tiredness after awakening subscales of the FIQ as well as the physical component of the SF-12. Six patients withdrew from the study, 3 because of side effects.. Our results suggest that the use of pregabalin can be a useful augmentation strategy in fibromyalgia patients partially responding to quetiapine.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibromyalgia; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Middle Aged; Pregabalin; Prospective Studies; Quetiapine Fumarate

A young woman presented with multiple central hypersensitivity disorders, including fibromyalgia, headache, pelvic pain and several smooth muscle spasm disorders, including irritable bowel syndrome, irritable bladder and Raynaud's phenomenon. She also had significant fatigue and sleep problems. Her case illustrates the importance and surprising frequency of atypical bipolar mood disorders in people with multiple central hypersensitivity pain disorders, especially with depression and anxiety resistant to antidepressant treatment. Considering neurological mechanisms common to her overlapping disorders was very helpful in guiding treatment choices. This experience illustrates the value of serotonin receptor type 2 (5HT2) inhibition with atypical neuroleptics, of neural cation channel and glutamate inhibition with anticonvulsants, and the potential usefulness of antidepressants after establishing 5HT2 control to enhance downward inhibitory tracts. Medications with combined usefulness for both bipolar mood and pain disorders were highly effective for her multiple hypersensitivity problems.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Fibromyalgia; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Migraine Disorders; Pain; Quetiapine Fumarate; Serotonin; Treatment Outcome