quetiapine-fumarate and Disorders-of-Excessive-Somnolence

Diagnosis of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents is increasing, and the early-onset form of bipolar disorder usually carries more morbidity than later-onset forms. Patient education and psychotherapeutic and psychosocial interventions should be used in conjunction with carefully planned medication regimens. Recent data support the use of atypical antipsychotics for manic or mixed states in children and adolescents. However, more information is needed about long-term treatment of mania, treatment of bipolar depression, and treatment of comorbid psychiatric conditions.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders; Bipolar Disorder; Child; Comorbidity; Dibenzothiazepines; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Humans; Obesity; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Thiazoles; Weight Gain

Disruptive behavior disorders, including conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and disruptive behavior disorder not otherwise specified, are serious conditions in children and adolescents that include a behavior pattern of violating the basic rights of others and age-appropriate rules or standards and may include aggressive behavior. Although no pharmacotherapy is currently approved for use in this population, evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotic treatment may be useful in patients with these conditions who present with problematic aggression. Currently, research on risperidone shows it to be effective in treating aggressive behavior in this patient population. Limited research is also available on olanzapine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole, but more research is needed on these and other agents. As with any pharmacotherapy, adverse events (including weight gain, headache, and somnolence) should be carefully considered with these medications, especially in children and adolescents, and it is important to properly dose and monitor patients during medication therapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzodiazepines; Child; Dibenzothiazepines; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Headache; Humans; Methylphenidate; Obesity; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone

Atypical antipsychotics are emerging as the first-line pharmacologic treatment for irritability (i.e., aggression, self-injurious behavior, and severe tantrums) in children and adolescents with autistic and other pervasive developmental disorders. Results from placebo-controlled and open-label studies of clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole in this subject population are reviewed. Additional placebo-controlled trials and studies of longer-term safety and tolerability are needed.

Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Autistic Disorder; Benzodiazepines; Child; Child Development Disorders, Pervasive; Child, Preschool; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Humans; Obesity; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Thiazoles

The aim of this analysis was to compare the effects of 2 atypical antipsychotic agents, lurasidone (80 mg/d or 160 mg/d) and quetiapine XR (600 mg/d), on daytime alertness, and to evaluate the effects of daytime sleepiness on treatment outcomes in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia.. Patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for schizophrenia were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with fixed doses of lurasidone 80 mg/d (n = 125), lurasidone 160 mg/d (n = 121), quetiapine XR 600 mg/d (n = 119), or placebo (n = 121), all dosed once daily in the evening, with food. Daytime sleepiness was assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).. Daytime sleepiness improved in the lurasidone and placebo-treated groups but worsened in the quetiapine XR treatment group when compared to placebo (p = 0.001) and to either dose of lurasidone (both p < 0.01). Sedation associated with quetiapine XR treatment mediated an improvement in agitation [assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Excitement (PANSS-EC) subscale] and a worsening in functional capacity [assessed by the University of California-San Diego (UCSD) Performance-Based Skills Assessment-Brief Version (UPSA-B) total score]; these mediating relationships were not observed for the lurasidone or placebo treatment groups.. In this 6-week double-blind study, treatment with lurasidone 80 mg or 160 mg, administered once daily in the evening, was associated with a reduction in daytime sleepiness similar in magnitude to placebo, while quetiapine XR 600 mg/d was associated with a significant increase in daytime sleepiness, compared to both lurasidone dose groups and placebo. Daytime sleepiness was associated with improvement in agitation and worsening in functional capacity for quetiapine XR, but not lurasidone or placebo-treated patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Cognition Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Isoindoles; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Male; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To describe the efficacy, safety and tolerability of lurasidone for the acute treatment of schizophrenia using the metrics number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH).. Study data were pooled from six Phase II and III, 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials that were conducted to test the efficacy and safety of lurasidone for the acute treatment of schizophrenia. Included were the following interventions: fixed doses of lurasidone 20, 40, 80, 120 and 160 mg/d; haloperidol 10 mg/d; olanzapine 15 mg/d; quetiapine extended-release 600 mg/d; placebo. The following outcomes were assessed: responder rates as defined by a reduction of ≥20, 30, 40 or 50% from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score; study completion; discontinuation due to an adverse event (AE); weight gain ≥7% from baseline; incidence of spontaneously reported AEs; incidence of total cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL, fasting triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL and glucose ≥126 mg/dL at endpoint. NNT for the efficacy outcomes were calculated after excluding one failed study. NNH for the safety/tolerability outcomes were calculated using all six studies. Likelihood of being helped or harmed (LHH) was also calculated to illustrate trade-offs between outcomes of improvement ≥30% on the PANSS vs. incidence of akathisia, nausea, sedation, somnolence and parkinsonism.. NNT vs. placebo for PANSS reductions ≥30% were 6, 6, 7 and 4 for lurasidone doses of 40, 80, 120 and 160 mg/d, respectively, and 4 and 3 for olanzapine 15 mg/d and quetiapine extended-release 600 mg/d, respectively. Lurasidone was not associated with any statistically significant disadvantages over placebo for weight gain or metabolic abnormalities; NNH vs. placebo for weight gain ≥7% from baseline was 4 for olanzapine and 9 for quetiapine extended-release in contrast to a NNH for this outcome ranging from 43 to 150 for lurasidone 40-160 mg/d. The 5 most consistently encountered adverse events attributable to lurasidone were akathisia, nausea, sedation, somnolence and parkinsonism, with NNH vs. placebo for lurasidone 40-120 mg/d ranging from 6 (akathisia with 120 mg/d) to 30 (parkinsonism with 80 mg/d). Lurasidone 160 mg/d appeared better tolerated than doses of 40, 80 or 120 mg/d for akathisia, nausea, sedation or somnolence, with no NNH values for these adverse events for 160 mg/d vs. placebo being statistically significant. LHH was favorable for lurasidone when contrasting PANSS reductions vs. adverse events.. NNT and NNH can help quantify efficacy, safety and tolerability outcomes and place lurasidone into clinical perspective. Advantages for lurasidone include a low propensity for weight gain and metabolic abnormalities. More commonly encountered adverse events include akathisia, nausea, sedation, somnolence and parkinsonism, but NNH values are generally in the double digits, reflecting an overall tolerable profile. Individual patient characteristics, values and preferences will need to be considered when selecting lurasidone over other antipsychotics.

Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol; Dibenzothiazepines; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Isoindoles; Likelihood Functions; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Male; Medication Adherence; Nausea; Numbers Needed To Treat; Olanzapine; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Weight Gain

Clinical practice and open-label studies suggest that quetiapine (an atypical anti-psychotic) might improve symptoms for individuals with social anxiety disorder (SAD). The purpose of this study was to provide a rigorous test of the acute impact of a single dose of quetiapine (25mg) on SAD symptoms.. Individuals with SAD (N=20) were exposed to a 4-min virtual reality (VR) public speaking challenge after having received quetiapine or placebo (double-blind) 1h earlier. A parallel VR challenge occurred 1 week later using a counter-balanced cross-over (within subject) design for the medication-placebo order between the two sessions.. There was no significant drug effect for quetiapine on the primary outcome measures. However, quetiapine was associated with significantly elevated heart rate and sleepiness compared with placebo.. Study findings suggest that a single dose of 25mg quetiapine is not effective in alleviating SAD symptoms in individuals with fears of public speaking.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Depression; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Phobic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Severity of Illness Index; Speech; Surveys and Questionnaires; User-Computer Interface; Young Adult

This study examined the efficacy and safety of quetiapine in combination with lithium or divalproex compared with placebo with lithium or divalproex in the prevention of recurrent mood events in bipolar I patients, most recent episode mania, depression, or mixed.. Patients received open-label quetiapine (400-800 mg/day; flexible, divided doses) with lithium or divalproex (target serum concentrations 0.5-1.2 mEq/L and 50-125 microg/mL, respectively) for up to 36 weeks to achieve at least 12 weeks of clinical stability. Patients were subsequently randomized to double-blind treatment with quetiapine (400-800 mg/day) plus lithium/divalproex or placebo plus lithium/divalproex for up to 104 weeks. The primary endpoint was time to recurrence of any mood event.. Treatment with quetiapine in combination with lithium/divalproex significantly increased the time to recurrence of any mood event compared with placebo plus lithium/divalproex. The proportion of patients having a mood event was markedly lower in the quetiapine than in the placebo group (18.5% versus 49.0%). The hazard ratio for time to recurrence of a mood event was 0.28 (P<0.001), a mania event 0.30 (P<0.001), and a depression event 0.26 (P<0.001) corresponding to risk reductions of 72%, 70%, and 74%, respectively. During the randomization phase, the most common adverse events occurring in > or =5% in the quetiapine group were somnolence, nasopharyngitis, and headache. Insomnia was more common in the placebo group. During the randomization phase, there was an increase in weight of 0.5 kg in the quetiapine group and a reduction of 1.9 kg in the placebo group. The incidence and incidence density of a single emergent fasting blood glucose value> or =126 mg/dL was higher with quetiapine than with placebo (9.3% versus 4.1%; 17.6 versus 9.5 patients per 100 patient-years).. This was an enriched sample of patients with bipolar I disorder responding to treatment with quetiapine plus lithium/divalproex.. Maintenance treatment with quetiapine in combination with lithium/divalproex significantly increased time to recurrence of any event (mania, depression, or mixed) irrespective of the polarity of the index episode compared with placebo with lithium/divalproex. Long-term treatment with quetiapine was generally well-tolerated. Quetiapine with lithium/divalproex can provide an effective long-term treatment option for bipolar I disorder to prevent recurrences not only of mania but also depression.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Demography; Dibenzothiazepines; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Female; Headache; Humans; International Cooperation; Lithium Carbonate; Male; Nasopharyngitis; Quetiapine Fumarate; Severity of Illness Index; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid; Young Adult

Data on the efficacy of quetiapine in borderline personality disorder (BPD) are still scarce. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of quetiapine for impulsivity and a broad range of affective symptoms in BPD. In this 12-week open-label study, we included individuals with BPD who presented to psychiatric in- and outpatient services. After a gradual titration of quetiapine, a flexible dose (range, 100-800 mg) was administered. The main outcome measures consisted of the scores on patient-rated questionnaires (Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory, Affective Lability Scale, Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety Inventory, Spielberger State and Trait Anger Inventory, and Beck Depression Inventory) and on neurocognitive tasks related to impulsivity (Stroop Color Word Task and IOWA Gambling Task). A mixed linear model, correcting for age, sex, antidepressant use, and weeks in psychotherapy, was applied. Forty-one patients (34 females and 7 males; mean [SD] age, 27.0 [9.0] years) were enrolled in the study, 32 of which completed the trial. Patients' scores decreased significantly (mean [SD] difference; P value) on the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (19.7 [2.0]; P < 0.0001), Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (11.5 [1.4]; P < 0.0001), Affective Lability Scale (0.75 [0.08]; P < 0.0001), Beck Depression Inventory (25.0 [1.7]; P < 0.0001), Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety Inventory state (19.9 [1.9]; P < 0.0001) and trait (20.8 [1.7]; P < 0.0001) subscale, and Spielberger State and Trait Anger Inventory state (7.3 [1.1]; P < 0.0001) and trait (10.1 [1.0]; P < 0.0001) subscale. In addition, patients showed significantly less inference on the Stroop Color Word Task and had more 'good choices' on the IOWA Gambling Task. These results suggest that quetiapine may be efficacious in the treatment of impulsivity and affective symptoms in BPD.

Topics: Adult; Affective Symptoms; Aggression; Anger; Antipsychotic Agents; Borderline Personality Disorder; Depression; Dibenzothiazepines; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Female; Humans; Impulsive Behavior; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Patient Dropouts; Patient Satisfaction; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Sex Factors; Test Anxiety Scale; Treatment Outcome; Xerostomia

Second-generation antipsychotics with a favorable tolerability profile have offered new treatment options for patients with borderline personality disorder. Sparse data are available on the use of quetia-pine in treating this disorder. The aim of the present study is to investigate efficacy and tolerability of quetia-pine in a group of patients with borderline personality disorder.. Fourteen consecutive outpatients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of borderline personality disorder were treated for 12 weeks with open-label quetiapine at the dose of 200-400 mg/day. Patients were assessed at baseline, week 4, and week 12 with the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) severity item, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index (BPDSI), and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-version 11 (BIS-11). Adverse effects were evaluated using the Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale. Statistical analysis was performed with the ANOVA for repeated measures. Significant p values were < or = .05.. Eleven patients completed the study. Three patients (21.4%) dropped out due to excessive somnolence or noncompliance. The mean +/- SD dose of quetia-pine was 309.09 +/- 83.12 mg/day. A significant change was found for the scores of the following scales: CGI severity item, BPRS, HAM-A, SOFAS, BPDSI total score, BPDSI items "impulsivity" and "outbursts of anger," and BIS-11. Common adverse effects were mild-to-moderate somnolence, dry mouth, and dizziness.. Initial data suggest that quetiapine is efficacious and well tolerated in treating patients who have borderline personality disorder, particularly when impulsiveness/aggressiveness-related symptoms are prominent. At the moment, no reliable comparison is available in the literature. Double-blind controlled trials are needed to verify these findings.

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Analysis of Variance; Anger; Antipsychotic Agents; Borderline Personality Disorder; Dibenzothiazepines; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dizziness; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Impulsive Behavior; Male; Pilot Projects; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Xerostomia

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine and risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia.. In this 8-week, double-blind, multicenter, flexible-dose study, patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV diagnosis) were randomly assigned to quetiapine (200-800 mg/day) or risperidone (2-8 mg/day). The primary hypothesis was that quetiapine was not inferior to risperidone. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores; secondary outcomes included response rate (> or = 40% reduction in PANSS scores), Clinical Global Impression-Change (CGI-C), and cognitive and social functioning. Tolerability assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events and changes in weight, glucose, and prolactin. Patients were recruited from June 2001 to September 2002.. Patients (N = 673) were randomly assigned to quetiapine (N = 338, mean dose = 525 mg/day) or risperidone (N = 335, mean dose = 5.2 mg/day). The primary analysis demonstrated noninferiority between treatments (p < .05). Improvements with both treatments were comparable on PANSS total, negative, and general psychopathology subscales. Risperidone-treated patients had a significantly (p = .03) greater improvement in PANSS positive subscale score among all patients, but not among completers. Improvements in PANSS response rates, CGI-C, and cognitive function were similar between treatment groups. Changes in serum glucose and weight were minimal and comparable. The rate of extrapyramidal symptom (EPS)-related adverse events was significantly higher with risperidone (22%) than quetiapine (13%; p < .01). Somnolence was more common with quetiapine (26%) than risperidone (20%; p = .04). Prolactin levels increased with risperidone (+35.5 ng/mL), but decreased with quetiapine (-11.5 ng/mL; p < .001).. Quetiapine and risperidone had broadly comparable clinical efficacy. Both agents improved cognitive and social functioning, and neither had a clinically significant effect on weight or glucose. Somnolence was more common with quetiapine; EPS and elevated prolactin rates were significantly higher with risperidone.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Cognition Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Male; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating psychiatric illness with a high cost burden. This analysis evaluates the cost-effectiveness of adjunctive brexpiprazole versus comparator branded adjunctive treatment for MDD and background antidepressant therapy (ADT) alone from a US payer perspective.. An economic model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of brexpiprazole versus comparator adjunctive treatment and ADT alone on total direct medical costs using a 6-week cycle time frame for a total of 48 weeks, with treatment response and remission as primary outcomes. The model consisted of 3 parts, 1 to represent the acute treatment phase and 2 to represent the maintenance stage.. In the base-case analysis, brexpiprazole as reference treatment resulted in cost per additional responder ranging from $19,442-$48,745 and cost per additional remitter ranging from $27,196-$71,839 versus comparator treatments over 48 weeks. Sensitivity analyses showed treatment with brexpiprazole was more costly, but more clinically effective in all probabilistic simulations.. This representation of disease natural history over 48 weeks may not account for all possible health states. Resource utilization on treatment was estimated using the resource use data from previous trials, and may overestimate medical costs compared to the real-world setting. Treatment comparators were limited to branded therapies, and head-to-head studies were not available to obtain data inputs.. Compared to other branded adjunctive therapies, brexpiprazole increases response and remission at 6 weeks; medical care cost savings were observed with the use of brexpiprazole. These findings may assist clinicians and formulary decision makers when selecting treatment for MDD.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Depressive Disorder, Major; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatigue; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Olanzapine; Patient Selection; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Serotonin Agents; Thiophenes; Weight Gain; Young Adult

Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is a hereditary disease characterized by central nervous system-related motor dysfunctions. Sleep disorders and frequent non-motor manifestations are commonly comorbid with SCA. To elucidate this relationship, we present three cases in a family that included multiple SCA type 2 patients with various sleep disorders. Complete physical examination, and genetic and imaging studies were performed. Anti-parkinsonism medications were prescribed after neurological examination. Clonazepam and/or quetiapine were administered for sleep disorders but failed to resolve insomnia and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Based on DSM-5 criteria, all cases were diagnosed with depression. After treatment with serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants, symptoms of insomnia and EDS, which are strongly associated with depression in SCA type 2 patients, improved significantly. It is crucial to recognize insomnia and EDS in neurodegenerative diseases, not only for earlier diagnosis, but also to improve quality of life.

Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Clonazepam; Depressive Disorder; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Family; Female; GABA Modulators; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Quetiapine Fumarate; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Spinocerebellar Ataxias; Treatment Outcome

Animal research suggests that medications that produce a weak dopamine D2 receptor blockade and potentiate noradrenergic activity may decrease alcohol drinking. In an open-label pilot study of subjects with alcohol dependence, we tested whether the combination of quetiapine, a weak dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, whose primary metabolite, desalkylquetiapine, is a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, and mirtazapine, a potent α2 norepinephrine receptor antagonist, would decrease alcohol drinking and craving. Twenty very heavy drinkers with alcohol dependence entered a trial of 8 weeks of treatment with quetiapine followed by 8 weeks of treatment with a combination of quetiapine plus mirtazapine. Alcohol use was assessed weekly with a Timeline Follow-Back interview and craving with the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale. Among the 11 completers, subjects reported improved outcomes in the quetiapine plus mirtazapine period compared to the quetiapine alone period: fewer very heavy drinking days per week (1.3 [SD = 2.4] vs. 2.1 [SD = 2.8]; t = 2.3, df = 10, p = 0.04); fewer total number of drinks per week (39.7 [SD = 61.6] vs. 53.4 [SD = 65.0]; t = 2.8, df = 10, p = 0.02); and lower craving scores (2.5 [SD = 1.4] vs. 3.2 [SD = 1.2]; t = 2.4, df = 10, p = 0.04). All subjects reported at least one adverse event; 72.7% reported somnolence. In this open-label pilot study, treatment with quetiapine plus mirtazapine was associated with a decrease in alcohol drinking and craving. These findings are consistent with our previous work in animal models of alcohol use disorders and suggest that further study of medications or combinations of medications with this pharmacologic profile is warranted.

Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Adult; Alcohol Drinking; Alcohol-Related Disorders; Antipsychotic Agents; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dopamine Antagonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Mianserin; Middle Aged; Mirtazapine; Pilot Projects; Quetiapine Fumarate; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of the study was to determine the downstream implications of atypical antipsychotic (AAP) prescribing in the intensive care unit (ICU), including discharge prescribing practices, monitoring, and attributable adverse drug events.. This retrospective cohort study included patients at least 18 years of age admitted to an ICU that received at least 2 doses of an AAP for documented delirium or avoidance of a deliriogenic medication. Exclusion criteria were documentation of an AAP as a home medication or initiation for a psychiatric indication unrelated to delirium (eg, schizophrenia).. During the 8-month study period, 156 patients were included and 133 (85.2%) patients survived to hospital discharge. Of the survivors, AAP therapy was continued for 112 (84.2%) patients upon ICU transfer and for 38 (28.6%) patients upon hospital discharge. A majority of these patients had evidence of delirium resolution or no indication for continuation documented at discharge. Of the 127 patients with an electrocardiogram ordered during AAP therapy, QTc prolongation occurred in 49 (31.4%) patients. An adverse drug event leading to drug discontinuation was documented in 16 (10.2%) patients.. Because of significant patient-centered implications, AAPs initiated in the ICU require continued evaluation for indication to avoid prolonged and possibly unnecessary use.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Basal Ganglia Diseases; Benzodiazepines; Cohort Studies; Delirium; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Female; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Intensive Care Units; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Patient Discharge; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Retrospective Studies; Risperidone; Survivors; Thiazoles