quetiapine-fumarate and Chronic-Disease

Results from pivotal registration trials in major depressive disorder cohere with outcomes from effectiveness studies indicating that the majority of individuals receiving single-agent pharmacotherapy fail to achieve and sustain symptomatic remission. Several factors provided the impetus for this review: suboptimal efficacy with existing pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder, quetiapine XR efficacy in the acute and maintenance treatment of bipolar depression, emerging pharmacodynamic evidence that quetiapine XR (and/or its metabolites) uniquely engages monoaminergic systems salient to symptom relief in depressive syndromes, the increasing use of second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of major depressive disorder and the recent FDA review of quetiapine XR in major depressive disorder. Studies reviewed herein are pivotal registration trials that evaluated the acute and maintenance efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine XR (as monotherapy and as adjunctive treatment) in major depressive disorder. In addition, we also review recent investigations characterizing the pharmacodynamic effect of quetiapine's principal active metabolite, norquetiapine. All studies were obtained from AstraZeneca (Wilmington, DE, USA) and have been presented at national/international scientific meetings. Taken together, extant studies demonstrated that quetiapine XR (50 - 300 mg) provides rapid and sustained symptomatic improvement in the acute and maintenance treatment of major depressive disorder. Quetiapine XR may also offer advantages relative to duloxetine in time to onset of antidepressant action. The major limitations of quetiapine XR use in major depressive disorder relate to weight gain and disrupted glucose/lipid homeostasis as well as sedation/somnolence. Quetiapine XR has tolerability advantages compared with duloxetine on measures of sexual dysfunction. The data from the studies reviewed herein also indicate that quetiapine XR poses a low risk for extrapyramidal side effects in middle-aged and elderly individuals with major depressive disorder.

Topics: Acute Disease; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The comparative antidepressant effects of clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia remain elusive, leading us to examine this question using the data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness phase 2E.. Ninety-nine patients who discontinued treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone because of inadequate efficacy were randomly assigned to open-label treatment with clozapine (n=49) or double-blind treatment with another atypical antipsychotic not previously received in the trial (olanzapine [n=19], quetiapine [n=15], or risperidone [n=16]). The primary outcome was the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) total score. Antidepressant effects of clozapine and the other atypical antipsychotics were compared in patients with chronic schizophrenia and those with a major depressive episode (MDE) at baseline (i.e. ≥6 on the CDSS), using mixed models.. No differences in the baseline CDSS total scores were found between the treatment groups regardless of presence of an MDE. Clozapine was more effective than quetiapine in antidepressant effects for chronic schizophrenia (p<.01 for the whole sample and p=.01 for those with an MDE), and comparable to olanzapine and risperidone.. The present findings suggest that clozapine demonstrates superior antidepressant effects to quetiapine and comparable effects to olanzapine and risperidone in chronic schizophrenia regardless of presence of MDE. Given the indication of clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and the negative impacts of depressive symptoms on clinical outcomes in schizophrenia, further research is warranted to investigate antidepressant effects of clozapine in TRS with an MDE.

Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Method; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

No large-scale randomized trial has compared the effect of different second-generation antipsychotic drugs and any first-generation drug on alcohol, drug and nicotine use in patients with schizophrenia. The Clinical Antipsychotic Trial of Intervention Effectiveness study randomly assigned 1432 patients formally diagnosed with schizophrenia to four second-generation antipsychotic drugs (olanzapine, risperidone quetiapine, and ziprasidone) and one first-generation antipsychotic (perphenazine) and followed them for up to 18 months. Secondary outcome data documented cigarettes smoked in the past week and alcohol and drug use severity ratings. At baseline, 61% of patients smoked, 35% used alcohol, and 23% used illicit drugs. Although there were significant effects of time showing reduction in substance use over the 18 months (all p < 0.0001), this study found no evidence that any antipsychotic was robustly superior to any other in a secondary analysis of data on substance use outcomes from a large 18-month randomized schizophrenia trial.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Alcoholism; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Illicit Drugs; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Smoking; Smoking Prevention; Substance-Related Disorders; Thiazoles; Young Adult

Noninferiority analysis is a statistical method of growing importance in comparative effectiveness research that has rarely been used in psychopharmacology. This method is used here to evaluate whether first-generation antipsychotics are clinically not inferior to second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) using data from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE). A conservative noninferiority margin (NIM) on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was derived from the smallest published value for the minimal clinically important difference, further reduced by 25%. This NIM was used to assess whether perphenazine is noninferior to olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine on the basis of the 95% confidence intervals of differences in mean PANSS outcomes (N = 1049). Perphenazine was noninferior to all three SGAs during 18 months of intention-to-treat analysis and in several subanalyses. Noninferiority can be evaluated from studies designed as superiority trials. Power was available in the CATIE to conduct noninferiority analysis.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Sample Size; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of ziprasidone versus the comparators olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine were investigated in adult patients with chronic schizophrenia, schizoaffective and schizophreniform disorders, with lack of efficacy or intolerance to their previous antipsychotic treatment based on clinical judgement of the investigator. A total of 293 patients were randomized to 12 weeks treatment with either ziprasidone 80-160 mg/day (n=147) or with one of the comparator drugs (n=146). In the latter group the investigator could choose between olanzapine 10-20 mg/day (n=24), risperidone 4-8 mg/day (n=22) or quetiapine 300-750 mg/day (n=97). The study comprised four visits including a baseline examination prior to randomization and further examinations at the end of weeks 1, 4 and 12. Ziprasidone was non-inferior (defined as a difference of 7 units or less on the PANSS scale to the disadvantage of ziprasidone) to the composite group (olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine) on the total PANSS score as well as on all subscores (P<0.0001); there were no significant between-group differences in the CGI-S and I and UKU scores. Ziprasidone-treated patients lost an average of 2.1 kg in the 12 weeks of the study, the mean weight for risperidone and quetiapine remained unchanged, and patients receiving olanzapine gained 3.1 kg on average.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cholesterol; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Tolerance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prolactin; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Triglycerides; Young Adult

The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study examined the comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments for individuals with chronic schizophrenia. Patients who had discontinued antipsychotic treatment in phases 1 and 2 were eligible for phase 3, in which they selected one of nine antipsychotic regimens with the help of their study doctor. We describe the characteristics of the patients who selected each treatment option and their outcomes.. Two hundred and seventy patients entered phase 3. The open-label treatment options were monotherapy with oral aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, long-acting injectable fluphenazine decanoate, or a combination of any two of these treatments.. Few patients selected fluphenazine decanoate (n=9) or perphenazine (n=4). Similar numbers selected each of the other options (range 33-41). Of the seven common choices, those who selected clozapine and combination antipsychotic treatment were the most symptomatic, and those who selected aripiprazole and ziprasidone had the highest body mass index. Symptoms improved for all groups, although the improvements were modest for the groups starting with relatively mild levels of symptoms. Side effect profiles of the medications varied considerably but medication discontinuations due to intolerability were rare (7% overall).. Patients and their doctors made treatment selections based on clinical factors, including severity of symptoms, response to prior treatments, and physical health status. Fluphenazine decanoate was rarely used among those with evidence of treatment non-adherence and clozapine was underutilized for those with poor previous response. Combination antipsychotic treatment warrants further study.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Olanzapine; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Quinolones; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This double-blind study compared a second generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs compared to a representative older agent for patients with schizophrenia who use or avoid illicit substances.. Schizophrenic subjects were recruited at 57 U.S. sites and randomly assigned to olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone for up to 18 months. The primary aim of this analysis was to delineate differences between the overall effectiveness of these five treatments among patients who used or did not use illicit substances.. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in time to all-cause treatment discontinuation among patients who use illicit drugs (median 3.3 to 6.8 months). Among non-users time to treatment discontinuation was significantly longer for patients treated with olanzapine (median 13.0 months) than perphenazine ( 5.9 months), risperidone (5.6 months), or quetiapine (5.0 months); time to discontinuation for ziprasidone (4.3 months) was even shorter, although the latter difference was not significant. The difference between risperidone and quetiapine, although small, was significant. All remaining differences were non-significant. Similar results were found for discontinuation due to inefficacy. There were no differences between illicit users and non-users in symptom reduction and global improvement, after adjustment for differential duration of treatment. Differences in discontinuation results were attenuated by non-compliance, but the trends persisted after controlling for treatment compliance.. Among patients with chronic schizophrenia who avoid use of illicit drugs, olanzapine was more effective than other antipsychotics as reflected by longer time to all-cause discontinuation, but illicit substance abuse attenuated this advantage, reinforcing the need for concurrent substance abuse treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Illicit Drugs; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Perphenazine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Substance-Related Disorders; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Treatment Refusal

This study examined the relative effects of the second-generation antipsychotic drugs and an older representative agent on psychosocial functioning in patients with chronic schizophrenia.. Consenting patients were enrolled in the NIMH Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project. In phase 1, patients were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone for up to 18 months. Clozapine was included for patients who chose this pathway after discontinuing phase 1 due to inefficacy; all other patients received another second-generation antipsychotic. Psychosocial functioning was assessed using the Quality of Life Scale.. Psychosocial functioning modestly improved for the one-third of phase 1 patients who reached the primary Quality of Life Scale analysis endpoint of 12 months (average effect size 0.19 SD units). Although for several of the drugs individually there were significant changes from baseline, overall there were no significant differences between the different agents. Results were similar at 6 and 18 months. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups in the amount of change in the Quality of Life Scale total score or subscale scores at 6, 12, or 18 months. Patients treated with clozapine in the efficacy pathway made comparable gains. Early treatment discontinuations, especially among patients most impaired at baseline, limited the ability to achieve more substantial functional gains.. All antipsychotic treatment groups in all phases made modest improvements in psychosocial functioning. There were no differences among them after 6, 12, or 18 months. More substantial improvements would likely require more intensive adjunctive psychosocial rehabilitation interventions.

Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Dibenzothiazepines; Follow-Up Studies; Health Status; Humans; National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.); Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Quality of Life; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social Adjustment; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; United States

The relative effectiveness of newly started antipsychotic drugs for individuals with schizophrenia may depend on multiple factors, including each patient's previous treatment response and the reason for a new medication trial. This randomized, double-blind study compared olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients who had just discontinued the older antipsychotic perphenazine.. Subjects with schizophrenia (N=114) who had been randomly assigned to and then discontinued perphenazine in phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) schizophrenia study were reassigned randomly to double-blinded treatment with olanzapine, 7.5-30.0 mg/day (N=38); quetiapine, 200-800 mg/day (N=38); or risperidone, 1.5-6.0 mg/day (N=38). The primary aim was to determine whether there were differences among these three treatments in effectiveness, as measured by time to treatment discontinuation for any reason. Secondary outcomes included reasons for treatment discontinuation and measures of drug tolerability.. The time to treatment discontinuation was longer for patients treated with quetiapine (median, 9.9 months) and olanzapine (7.1 months) than with risperidone (3.6 months). There were no significant differences between treatments on discontinuation due to inefficacy, intolerability, or patient decision.. Among this group of patients with chronic schizophrenia who had just discontinued the older antipsychotic perphenazine, quetiapine and olanzapine were more effective than risperidone, as reflected by longer time to discontinuation for any reason. In the context of other results from the CATIE study, the effectiveness and acceptability of antipsychotic drugs appears to vary considerably according to clinical circumstances.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Perphenazine; Proportional Hazards Models; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Treatment Outcome

When a schizophrenia patient has an inadequate response to treatment with an antipsychotic drug, it is unclear what other antipsychotic to switch to and when to use clozapine. In this study, the authors compared switching to clozapine with switching to another atypical antipsychotic in patients who had discontinued treatment with a newer atypical antipsychotic in the context of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials for Interventions Effectiveness (CATIE) investigation.. Ninety-nine patients who discontinued treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone in phase 1 or 1B of the trials, primarily because of inadequate efficacy, were randomly assigned to open-label treatment with clozapine (N=49) or blinded treatment with another newer atypical antipsychotic not previously received in the trial (olanzapine [N=19], quetiapine [N=15], or risperidone [N=16]).. Time until treatment discontinuation for any reason was significantly longer for clozapine (median=10.5 months) than for quetiapine (median=3.3), or risperidone (median=2.8), but not for olanzapine (median=2.7). Time to discontinuation because of inadequate therapeutic effect was significantly longer for clozapine than for olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. At 3-month assessments, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores had decreased more in patients treated with clozapine than in patients treated with quetiapine or risperidone but not olanzapine. One patient treated with clozapine developed agranulocytosis, and another developed eosinophilia; both required treatment discontinuation.. For these patients with schizophrenia who prospectively failed to improve with an atypical antipsychotic, clozapine was more effective than switching to another newer atypical antipsychotic. Safety monitoring is necessary to detect and manage clozapine's serious side effects.

Topics: Adult; Agranulocytosis; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Cross-Over Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Eosinophilia; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Piperazines; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

In the treatment of schizophrenia, changing antipsychotics is common when one treatment is suboptimally effective, but the relative effectiveness of drugs used in this strategy is unknown. This randomized, double-blind study compared olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone in patients who had just discontinued a different atypical antipsychotic.. Subjects with schizophrenia (N=444) who had discontinued the atypical antipsychotic randomly assigned during phase 1 of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) investigation were randomly reassigned to double-blind treatment with a different antipsychotic (olanzapine, 7.5-30 mg/day [N=66]; quetiapine, 200-800 mg/day [N=63]; risperidone, 1.5-6.0 mg/day [N=69]; or ziprasidone, 40-160 mg/day [N=135]). The primary aim was to determine if there were differences between these four treatments in effectiveness measured by time until discontinuation for any reason.. The time to treatment discontinuation was longer for patients treated with risperidone (median: 7.0 months) and olanzapine (6.3 months) than with quetiapine (4.0 months) and ziprasidone (2.8 months). Among patients who discontinued their previous antipsychotic because of inefficacy (N=184), olanzapine was more effective than quetiapine and ziprasidone, and risperidone was more effective than quetiapine. There were no significant differences between antipsychotics among those who discontinued their previous treatment because of intolerability (N=168).. Among this group of patients with chronic schizophrenia who had just discontinued treatment with an atypical antipsychotic, risperidone and olanzapine were more effective than quetiapine and ziprasidone as reflected by longer time until discontinuation for any reason.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Body Weight; Chronic Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Dropouts; Piperazines; Proportional Hazards Models; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Survival Analysis; Thiazoles; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a disabling and often chronic condition. Patients with BD suffer from depression at least one-third of the time, but they do not always respond well to conventional mood stabilizers. Attempts to treat them with antidepressants can provoke a switch to mania or increased cycling. Our open-label trial aimed to assess the long-term response of patients with bipolar depression to the addition of quetiapine to their usual treatment. Our study also sought to assess the safety and tolerability of quetiapine in patients with BD.. To meet inclusion criteria for the study, patients had a DSM-IV diagnosis of type I or II BD, were aged 18 years and older, currently suffered from depression with a score of > 18 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), and had no change in antidepressant use for at least 3 weeks prior to the study. We added quetiapine to patients' medication and attempted to increase the dosage to at least 400 mg daily. Outcome was measured at baseline and once monthly for 12 months on the HDRS, the Young Mania Rating Scale, the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale.. There were 19 patients enrolled in the study (6 men and 13 women), 2 of whom dropped out because they could not tolerate the drug. Seventeen completed at least 2 assessments, and 7 patients completed the full 12-month trial. Data for the 17 patients (that is, last observation carried forward) at 12 months shows HDRS scores reduced from 27.2 to 12.1 and CGI scores reduced from 4.7 to 2.6.. Quetiapine seems to be helpful to and relatively well tolerated by patients with bipolar depression when it is added to their usual treatment. There is, however, a need for controlled trials.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Chronic Disease; Depressive Disorder; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Administration Schedule; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Periodicity; Prospective Studies; Quetiapine Fumarate; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

The relative effectiveness of second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs as compared with that of older agents has been incompletely addressed, though newer agents are currently used far more commonly. We compared a first-generation antipsychotic, perphenazine, with several newer drugs in a double-blind study.. A total of 1493 patients with schizophrenia were recruited at 57 U.S. sites and randomly assigned to receive olanzapine (7.5 to 30 mg per day), perphenazine (8 to 32 mg per day), quetiapine (200 to 800 mg per day), or risperidone (1.5 to 6.0 mg per day) for up to 18 months. Ziprasidone (40 to 160 mg per day) was included after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration. The primary aim was to delineate differences in the overall effectiveness of these five treatments.. Overall, 74 percent of patients discontinued the study medication before 18 months (1061 of the 1432 patients who received at least one dose): 64 percent of those assigned to olanzapine, 75 percent of those assigned to perphenazine, 82 percent of those assigned to quetiapine, 74 percent of those assigned to risperidone, and 79 percent of those assigned to ziprasidone. The time to the discontinuation of treatment for any cause was significantly longer in the olanzapine group than in the quetiapine (P<0.001) or risperidone (P=0.002) group, but not in the perphenazine (P=0.021) or ziprasidone (P=0.028) group. The times to discontinuation because of intolerable side effects were similar among the groups, but the rates differed (P=0.04); olanzapine was associated with more discontinuation for weight gain or metabolic effects, and perphenazine was associated with more discontinuation for extrapyramidal effects.. The majority of patients in each group discontinued their assigned treatment owing to inefficacy or intolerable side effects or for other reasons. Olanzapine was the most effective in terms of the rates of discontinuation, and the efficacy of the conventional antipsychotic agent perphenazine appeared similar to that of quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Olanzapine was associated with greater weight gain and increases in measures of glucose and lipid metabolism.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lipids; Male; Olanzapine; Patient Compliance; Perphenazine; Piperazines; Proportional Hazards Models; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

With the notable exception of clozapine, there is at present insufficient information on the efficacy of atypical antipsychotic medications in patients with poorly responsive schizophrenia. The present study reports on the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine and haloperidol in patients with schizophrenia who showed no response to treatment with fluphenazine. This study is a post hoc subanalysis of an 8-week, double-blind study of patients receiving quetiapine 600 mg/day or haloperidol 20 mg/day. The proportion of patients classified as "Clinical Global Impression responders" (defined as Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness score of < or = 3 at study end) was greater in the quetiapine group compared with the haloperidol group (51% vs. 25%; P = 0.023). Overall, quetiapine was well tolerated with less extrapyramidal side-effects and reduction in prolactin when compared to haloperidol. Weight gain was modest but more apparent in quetiapine-treated patients. Quetiapine is an appropriate treatment choice in patients who do not respond to prior antipsychotic treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance; Drug Tolerance; Female; Fluphenazine; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia

Quetiapine fumarate (Seroquel [ICI 204,636]) is an atypical dibenzothiazepine antipsychotic with a greater affinity for 5-hydroxytryptamine2 (5-HT2) receptors than for D2 dopamine receptors; its efficacy in patients with schizophrenia was shown in early phase 2 trials (maximum dose, 750 mg/d).. In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 286 patients hospitalized with chronic or subchronic schizophrenia (DSM-III-R) were randomized to 6 weeks of treatment with high-dose quetiapine fumarate (< or = 750 mg/d), n = 96; low-dose quetiapine fumarate (< or = 250 mg/d), n = 94; or placebo, n = 96. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness item scores were the primary efficacy variables. Secondary efficacy variables included the BPRS positive-symptom cluster score, the Modified Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms summary score (United States only), and the total score from the negative scale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (Europe only). Scores were analyzed using an analysis of covariance for change from baseline at end point with last observations carried forward. The model included baseline score (covariate), center, and treatment. Extrapyramidal symptoms were assessed using the Simpson-Angus Scale and the Barnes Akathisia Scale; abnormal involuntary movements were assessed using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale. Frequency distributions of grouped change-from-baseline scores were analyzed using chi 2 tests.. Of 280 patients in whom the efficacy of quetiapine was evaluated, 159 (42% of those receiving high-dose treatment; 57%, low-dose treatment; and 59%, placebo) withdrew before trial completion, primarily because of treatment failure. Significant (P < .001, BPRS; P = .003, Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness item; and P = .003, BPRS positive-symptom cluster) differences were identified between patients receiving high-dose quetiapine and placebo for both primary efficacy variables, with end point differences in the BPRS positive-symptom cluster score showing quetiapine's consistency in reducing positive symptoms. The reduction of negative symptoms was less consistent; high-dose quetiapine was superior on the Modified Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms but not on the negative scale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Quetiapine was well tolerated and did not induce extrapyramidal symptoms, sustained elevations of prolactin, or clinically significant changes in hematologic parameters.. Quetiapine is an effective antipsychotic with a favorable safety profile. The optimum dose is probably greater than 250 mg/d.

Topics: Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Headache; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Sleep; Treatment Outcome

Schizophrenia is a low-prevalence mental disorder with a global age-standardized prevalence of 21 million people (2016). Second-generation antipsychotics (lurasidone and quetiapine XR) are recommended as the first-line treatment for schizophrenia. It is interesting to investigate how the results of clinical studies translate into direct medical costs. The objective of this analysis was to assess the direct medical costs related to pharmaceutical treatments and the management of relapses in patients affected with schizophrenia treated with lurasidone (74 mg) vs quetiapine XR (300 mg) assuming the Italian and Spanish National Health Service perspective.. A health economic model was developed based on a previously published model. The analysis considered direct medical costs related to the pharmacological therapies and inpatient or outpatient management of relapses (direct medical costs referred to 2019). The probability of relapses and related costs were derived from two systematic reviews. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was implemented to test the robustness of the results.. The use of lurasidone (74 mg) compared with quetiapine XR (300 mg) would lead to a reduction in direct medical costs in Italy and Spain, with a lower cost per patient of - 163.7 € (- 9.0%) and - 327.2 € (- 22.7%), respectively. In detail, it would lead to an increase in the cost of therapy of + 53.8% and of + 30.5% in Italy and Spain, respectively, to a decrease in the cost of relapses with hospitalization of - 135.7%, and to an increase in the cost of relapses without hospitalization of + 24.5%.. The use of lurasidone (74 mg) for the treatment of patients affected with schizophrenia, compared with quetiapine XR (300 mg), would be a cost-saving strategy in the two contexts investigated assuming the National Health Service point of view.

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Italy; Lurasidone Hydrochloride; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Quetiapine Fumarate; Recurrence; Schizophrenia; Spain; State Medicine

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Butyrophenones; Ceftriaxone; Chronic Disease; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Neurosyphilis; Quetiapine Fumarate; Treatment Outcome

Schizophrenia is a severe and debilitating psychiatric disorder. Pharmacological interventions aim to ameliorate symptoms and reduce the risk of relapse and costly hospitalisation. Despite the established efficacy of antipsychotic medication, compliance to treatment is poor, particularly with oral formulation. The emergence of long acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic formulations in recent years has aimed to counteract the poor compliance rates observed and optimise long term patient outcomes.. To estimate the cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg (AOM 400) vs. risperidone long acting injectable (RLAI), paliperidone long acting injectable (PLAI) and olanzapine long acting injectable (OLAI) in the maintenance treatment of chronic, stable schizophrenia patients in the United Kingdom.. A Markov model was developed to emulate the treatment pathway of a hypothetical cohort of patients initiating maintenance treatment with LAI antipsychotics. The economic analysis was conducted from a National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspective over a 10 year time horizon. Efficacy and safety probabilities were derived from mixed treatment comparisons (MTCs) where possible. Analyses were conducted assuming pooled dosing from randomised clinical trials included in the MTCs.. The model estimates that AOM 400 improves clinical outcomes by reducing relapses per patient comparative to other LAIs over the model time horizon (2.38, 2.53, 2.70, and 2.67 for AOM 400, RLAI, PLAI and OLAI respectively). In the deterministic analysis, AOM 400 dominated PLAI and OLAI; an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of GBP 3,686 per QALY gained was observed against RLAI. Results from the univariate sensitivity analyses highlighted the probability and cost of relapse as main drivers for cost-effectiveness. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, AOM 400 demonstrated a marginally higher probability of being cost-effective (51%) than RLAI, PLAI and OLAI (48%, 1% and 0%, respectively) at a willingness to pay threshold of GBP 20,000.. The model was built to accommodate results of an adjusted MTC analysis. Furthermore the model effectively captures repercussions of deteriorating compliance to treatment by incorporating three levels of compliance with elevated risks of relapse for partial compliance and non-compliance. Limitations of the analysis include the limited number of studies incorporated in the MTC, the extrapolation of short term clinical data and the exclusion of the wider societal burden.. Comparative to other atypical antipsychotics, AOM 400 represents value for money in the maintenance treatment of chronic, stable schizophrenia; however, in light of the PSA findings and comparable cost-effectiveness (i.e. against RLAI), the product profile and wider benefits of the respective treatments must be taken into account when prescribing antipsychotics.. Future research should assess the use of LAI antipsychotics earlier in the disease course of schizophrenia to see whether improved compliance and outcomes shortly following the onset of psychosis has the potential to alter the disease trajectory. Moreover it should be assessed whether changes in the disease trajectory can alleviate cost and resource pressures placed on national health services.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Clozapine; Computer Simulation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Markov Chains; Models, Economic; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology; State Medicine; United Kingdom

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Cough; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Quetiapine Fumarate

Quetiapine with (Seroquel) is an atypical antipsychotic agent that is sometimes used to help chronic pain patients sleep. The rationale for this therapeutic choice is discussed.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Pain; Quetiapine Fumarate; Sleep Wake Disorders

The neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) plays important roles in neural migration, synaptogenesis and CNS development. Change of N-CAM fragments in CSF of schizophrenic patients was reported previously, and we aimed to detect difference in circulating N-CAM in the serum of schizophrenic patients and healthy controls.. Samples were from 14 chronic schizophrenic patients including 3 drug naïve patients and 11 healthy controls. After removal of albumin and globulin, N-CAM fragments were measured by Western blot technique with monoclonal antibody.. N-CAM immunoreactive bands were detected primarily at 180, 140, 120, 75, 68 and 52 kDa. Samples from patients and controls showed similar patterns of bands, but schizophrenic patients showed increases or decreases at some bands intensity compared to healthy controls. The 68 kDa/73-75 kDa bands intensity ratio was substantially elevated in schizophrenic patients (0.262+/-0.14 in patients, 0.065+/-0.04 in controls) especially, the three drug naïve patients had a higher value of this ratio compared to the medicated patients. One drug naïve patient showed a decrease in this ratio after one month of antipsychotic medication.. The results suggest elevated membrane turnover and/or abnormalities in the regulation of proteolysis of N-CAM in schizophrenia.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Blotting, Western; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Indoles; Isoindoles; Male; Middle Aged; Molecular Weight; Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules; Olanzapine; Protein Isoforms; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Thiazoles

Clinical studies show better response rates of patients with depression and schizophrenia to combinations of atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants, compared to responses to either type of drugs alone. Animal studies demonstrate that some antipsychotics and antidepressants increase neurogenesis and BDNF expression in the hippocampus, which is reduced in volume in patients with depression or schizophrenia. We hypothesized that the better therapeutic effects of combined treatment seen in schizophrenia and depression patients are related to the additive or synergistic effects of combined treatment on hippocampal neurogenesis and BDNF expression. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effects of chronic administration of quetiapine, venlafaxine, and their combination, on hippocampal cell proliferation and BDNF expression in rats, when subjected to chronic restraint stress (CRS) during the last 2 weeks of a 3-week drug administration period. We found (1) CRS decreased hippocampal cell proliferation and BDNF expression; (2) chronic administration of quetiapine or venlafaxine dose-dependently prevented these decreases in hippocampal cell proliferation and BDNF expression caused by CRS (6 h/day for 14 days); (3) the combination of lower doses of quetiapine (5 mg/kg) and venlafaxine (2.5 mg/kg) increased hippocampal cell proliferation and prevented BDNF decrease in stressed rats, whereas each of the drugs exerted mild or no effects; (4) individual higher doses of quetiapine (10 mg/kg) or venlafaxine (5 mg/kg) exerted effects comparable to those produced by their combination. These results support our hypothesis and can lead to future studies to develop new therapeutic approaches for treatment-resistant depression and the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor; Cell Proliferation; Chronic Disease; Cyclohexanols; Depressive Disorder; Dibenzothiazepines; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hippocampus; Neuronal Plasticity; Neurons; Quetiapine Fumarate; Rats; Restraint, Physical; Schizophrenia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Stem Cells; Stress, Psychological; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Male; Pain; Pain Measurement; Quetiapine Fumarate; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

Anemia of chronic disease (ACD) is a condition of decreased red cell mass secondary to some other chronic inflammatory condition. In ACD total body iron stores are normal, though serum iron is typically low secondary to iron sequestration by macrophages, and often iron supplementation is not an effective treatment for ACD for the same reason. The pathogenesis of ACD had been poorly understood, but recently there has been important progress: upregulation of interleukin-6 (Il-6) secondary to the underlying chronic inflammatory disease upregulates expression of the protein hepcidin. Upregulation of hepcidin causes anemia by a number of mechanisms: decreased intestinal absorption of iron from the duodenum, increased sequestration of iron by macrophages. Thus, downregulation of Il-6 may represent a most important treatment avenue for ACD. Anti-Il-6 antibodies might be a way to lower Il-6 levels, but such antibodies besides being expensive would have to be given intravenously or intramuscularly, and such large immunogenic molecules may not be appropriate in patients already with a chronic inflammatory condition. Here, we note that an immediately available and potentially effective treatment for ACD is to decrease Il-6 levels by histamine (H1) receptor antagonism, given that histamine acting through the H1 receptor is known to be a potent positive regulator of Il-6. Among the classes of medications that are H1 antagonists we point out that atypical antipsychotic medications such as olanzapine and quetiapine are among the most potent H1 antagonists, and can have simple daily dosing schedules and thus may be particularly useful in ACD.

Topics: Anemia; Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Down-Regulation; Gene Expression Regulation; Hepcidins; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Interleukin-6; Iron; Models, Biological; Olanzapine; Quetiapine Fumarate; Receptors, Histamine H1; Up-Regulation

Antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal side effects have a negative impact on treatment for mental illness. Acute dystonic reactions are uncomfortable and frightening to the patient, and often lead to early discontinuation of drug therapy and worsened long-term outcome. The lower propensity of the atypical antipsychotic agents to cause extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) has been associated with multiple benefits, including improved adherence. The authors describe a 57-year-old male patient who was in the treatment refractory unit. This patient exhibited extreme sensitivity to antipsychotic agents, experiencing acute dystonic reactions with quetiapine and olanzapine, in addition to older typical antipsychotic agents. The patient has not experienced acute EPS since therapy with aripiprazole was initiated. Further complicating this patient's course is his unusual sensitivity to experiencing dystonic reactions. We have observed acute dystonias in the absence of antipsychotic treatment and in the context of seizure activity (or paroxysmal dyskinetic activity). The true etiology of the latter dystonic activity has not been completely determined due to the patient's unwillingness to cooperate with invasive testing. None of the gene variations tested (CYP2D6 phenotype, two dopamine D2 receptor variants and one D3 receptor variant) appeared to explain the patient's vulnerability to acute dystonic reactions.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Dibenzothiazepines; Dystonia; Genotype; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phenytoin; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Seizures; Valproic Acid

A 52-year-old patient with treatment-resistant paranoid schizophrenia developed severe parkinsonian features after more than 20 years of antipsychotic drug therapy. The role of this therapy was thought to have been a contributing factor to the patient's clinical presentation, although Parkinson's disease could not be ruled out. Originally, parkinsonian symptoms developed acutely and progressed to hand tremor, sialorrhea, upper body rigidity, masked facies, striatal hand, bradykinesia, and a severe, unsteady, shuffling gait. Tremor and rigidity were the only parkinsonian symptoms that responded to anticholinergic therapy. After converting from a first- to a second-generation antipsychotic drug, the patient maintained psychiatric stability, with some improvement in motor functioning-most notably decreased upper body rigidity. Our findings are consistent with the literature on quetiapine therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease in terms of adequately controlling psychosis without worsening motor symptoms. The difference, however, was that in most cases reported, psychotic features were the result of dopamine-enhancing treatments and not schizophrenia.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Parkinsonian Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Humans; Male; Quetiapine Fumarate; Tic Disorders; Treatment Outcome

In of 67 patients with ICD-10 diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia compared influence of atypical neuroleptic Seroquel (31 patients) and typical neuroleptic haloperidol (36 patients) on cognitive disturbances. The latter were evaluated using 8 neuropsychological tests and clinical symptoms were measured by the PANSS. There were 39 patients with the first episode and 28 with a chronic disease course. A mean therapeutic dosage for Seroquel was 316.21 mg/day, for haloperidol--12.34 mg/day, treatment duration was 3-12 months. The effect was evaluated 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the beginning of the treatment. Compared to haloperidol, Seroquel proved to be more effective for all the indices studied, in particular for executive functions and verbal productivity that correlated with negative symptoms reduction measured with the PANSS. Cognitive functions related to positive symptoms (attention, verbal memory) improved in both groups. Seroquel positively affected motor functions. The study confirmed the earlier reports on possibility of neurocognitive deficit correction by atypical antipsychotic drugs in the first episode as well as in chronic patients with schizophrenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Cognition; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia, Paranoid; Time Factors

Topics: 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles; Adult; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doxepin; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Esophagitis, Peptic; Humans; Lorazepam; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Omeprazole; Pantoprazole; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Sulfoxides

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Mental Recall; Quetiapine Fumarate; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

A case is reported of a 54-year-old female patient with schizophrenia and cognitive impairment. Her memory dysfunction improved following the addition of donepezil to quetiapine. The possible implications for future studies are reviewed.

Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Donepezil; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Indans; Mental Recall; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Nootropic Agents; Piperidines; Quetiapine Fumarate; Retention, Psychology; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male; Quetiapine Fumarate; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Failure

This retrospective, case series audit assessed the clinical and health-economic impact of long-term treatment with quetiapine ('Seroquel'), a new atypical antipsychotic, in patients with chronic schizophrenia. The study design was of a case series format, comprising patients entered from one centre into the open-label extension of a multicentre 6-week efficacy study. Twenty-one patients (15 male, six female; mean age 39 years) were studied, of whom 17 (81%) had been rated as 'partially responsive' to previous antipsychotics. Data on hospitalisations and information on symptoms were collected retrospectively for the 12 months before quetiapine treatment was initiated and for the 12 months after. Quetiapine was effective in reducing psychotic symptoms with mean BPRS scores reducing significantly, from 38 to 21 (P < 0.005). Motor function was also significantly improved with mean Simpson scale scores reducing from 15 to 12 (P < 0.005). Average inpatient days were reduced by 11% in year two (97 compared with 109 days) while the overall costs of treatment, including drug costs, fell by 5% (I pound sterling 20,843 to I pound sterling 19,827). Four patients had been hospitalised for longer than 5 years before starting quetiapine; these chronically institutionalised patients remained in hospital, despite improved clinical outcomes (mean BPRS scores after treatment of 34, compared with 43 before), for the full 12 months of quetiapine treatment. Were the data from this audit to be re-analysed excluding these four patients then average inpatient days would have been reduced by 33% (45 to 30 days) and overall cost of treatment by 19% (I pound sterling 8617 to I pound sterling 7011). This audit suggests that treatment with quetiapine over this 1-year period was associated with both clinical improvements and a decreased usage of inpatient services. The reduction in hospitalisation costs would appear to compensate for the increased cost of drug treatment. Significantly, potential savings appear to be greatest for those patients with a 'revolving door' pattern of repeated readmission.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Health Care Costs; Hospitalization; Hospitals, Psychiatric; Humans; Long-Term Care; Male; Middle Aged; Psychomotor Performance; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia

Quetiapine fumarate is a recently marketed atypical antipsychotic medication proved to be effective in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in the younger population. There is a paucity of studies of this drug in the elderly and more data are needed on the effects of quetiapine in this population, especially those with comorbid medical illnesses. Quetiapine was used to treat seven elderly hospitalized patients between 61 and 72 years of age who manifested signs of psychosis related to schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder. All patients had been treated previously with conventional antipsychotics or other atypical antipsychotics. Response was assessed by observation of patient's behavior. Four patients responded to treatment; three did not respond. Positive symptoms decreased markedly in all four responders. Negative symptoms showed marked decrease in two patients and moderate decrease in one patient. Preexisting extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) diminished in three patients. Transient hypotension, dizziness, and somnolence occurred in two patients. No other side effects were noted. No adverse consequences occurred when lithium, carbamazepine, valproic acid, or venlafaxine was given concurrently. The reduction of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia and lack of significant EPS and minimal sedative, hypotensive, and anticholinergic side effects indicate that quetiapine may be a safe and effective medication for the elderly.

Topics: Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Chronic Disease; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quetiapine Fumarate; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenic Psychology

In controlled studies of patients with schizophrenia, the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine, 300 mg/day, has been shown to be as effective in the treatment of positive and negative symptoms as haloperidol. However, little is known about the efficacy of quetiapine in patients with psychotic mood disorders. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of quetiapine in the treatment of psychotic mood disorders in comparison with nonaffective psychotic disorders and identify clinical factors associated with quetiapine response.. In a naturalistic setting, by reviewing medical records, we assessed response to quetiapine and factors associated with response to quetiapine in 145 consecutive patients newly treated with the drug at a nonprofit academic psychiatric hospital. These patients had received a discharge diagnosis of bipolar disorder (manic, mixed, or depressive type), major depression with psychotic features, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder (bipolar or depressive type), delusional disorder, or psychosis not otherwise specified (NOS) according to DSM-IV criteria.. Patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, manic, mixed, or depressed and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type displayed higher response rates (> 74%) compared with patients with schizophrenia. However, this finding did not achieve statistical significance. A diagnosis of major depression with psychotic features (p = .02) and longer duration of illness (p = .03) were associated with less chance of responding.. Quetiapine may be a useful alternative or adjunctive treatment for patients with bipolar and schizoaffective disorders.

Topics: Adult; Affective Disorders, Psychotic; Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Chronic Disease; Depressive Disorder; Dibenzothiazepines; Female; Hospital Records; Humans; Male; Prognosis; Psychotic Disorders; Quetiapine Fumarate; Retrospective Studies; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenia, Paranoid; Schizophrenic Psychology; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome