pyrimidinones and Skin-Diseases

Tremendous progress has been made in the clinical landscape of advanced-stage. Targeted therapy with BRAF plus MEK inhibitors has become the standard of care for patients with advanced-stage

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Fever; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Melanoma; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases; Oximes; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Diseases; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Patients treated with ipilimumab or targeted inhibitors of the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway (vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and trametinib) for advanced cutaneous melanoma often experience drug-related skin toxicities denoted as dermatologic adverse events (DAEs). Although rarely life-threatening, DAEs may emerge dramatically and potentially compromise oncologic therapy if not managed in a timely and effective manner. Early recognition of DAEs is critical to providing optimal skin care and prompt consultation with a dermatologist should be obtained when a diagnosis is unclear. The expanding utilization of new melanoma drugs compels physicians to maintain a watchful eye for both known and novel DAEs and to adopt a low threshold to biopsy worrisome skin findings. Numerous therapeutic options are available to manage DAEs including topical and systemic agents as well as surgical and destructive modalities. Applying such methods improves overall patient care and optimizes the effectiveness of new therapies for advanced cutaneous melanoma.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Inflammation; Ipilimumab; Melanoma; Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant; Oximes; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin; Skin Diseases; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib

We saw a 59-year-old patient who was treated with dabrafenib and trametinib because of metastatic melanoma. She had an asymptomatic, black-blue macula in the excision scar. Histopathology showed tumoral melanosis. This is an histological term for dermal aggregates of melanophages, associated with regression of melanoma.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cicatrix; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Melanoma; Melanosis; Middle Aged; Oximes; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Diseases; Skin Neoplasms

MAPK (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK-MAP) and mTOR inhibitors are novel treatments for pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The literature on common cutaneous adverse reactions to these therapies is sparse in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to describe common cutaneous adverse reactions to BRAF, MEK, and mTOR inhibitors in children with CNS tumors.. In this cross-sectional study, patients younger than 21 years of age receiving BRAF, MEK, and mTOR inhibitor monotherapy for a CNS tumor were enrolled over a one-year period. Full body skin examination, photographs of dermatologic findings, and initial treatment recommendations were included at the initial visit, and follow-up skin examinations were recommended every three months.. Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the study. Fifty percent (11/22) received trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, 27.3% (6/22) received dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, and 22.7% (5/22) received everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor. Median age at visit was 11 years (range, 3-19). Median time from treatment initiation to skin examination was 4.5 months (range, 0-43). Ninety-six percent (21/22) of all patients had at least one skin reaction. The most common reactions across treatment groups included follicular/acneiform eruptions and xerosis. Two patients on MEK inhibitors and one patient on a BRAF inhibitor required therapy cessation due to severe cutaneous reactions.. Cutaneous reactions to targeted anticancer therapy in children are common, treatable, and rarely require drug dose reduction or discontinuation. Routine surveillance and early intervention may improve quality of life and facilitate continuation of life-saving therapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Child; Child, Preschool; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Eruptions; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Oximes; Prognosis; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Diseases; Young Adult

BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) and MEK inhibitors (MEKi) are among the cornerstones of metastatic melanoma therapy demonstrating excellent response rates with duration of 7-12 m. Long-term benefit from these agents was reported in patients with normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and less than three disease sites. However, a treatment-dependent marker for long-term efficacy is lacking. Data suggest that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are associated with clinical benefit in patients treated with immunotherapy and that response to BRAF/MEK therapy may have an underlying immune mechanism. We hypothesised that AEs with an underlying immune mechanism may be associated with a durable response to targeted therapy. We retrospectively identified a cohort of 78 BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma patients treated with BRAFi or BRAFi + MEKi between November 2010 and November 2013. Four treatment-related AEs including vitiligo, uveitis, erythema nodosum and keratitis sicca were defined as irAEs of interest. Retrospective analysis of AEs in relationship to progression-free survival (PFS), disease burden and LDH levels was performed. Median PFS (mPFS) for all patients was 7.5 months with responses ongoing in eight patients as of April 2017. Ten patients were identified with the AEs defined previously. Cox regression analysis revealed a very strong association between those AEs and PFS; mPFS was 42.8 m in patients with at least one AE versus 6.1 m in those without an AE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.22, p = 0.002). This association was independent of LDH levels and disease burden (HR 0.24, p = 0.035). This analysis demonstrates a strong association between immune AEs and durable response to targeted therapy and may provide a treatment-related biomarker to estimate the outcome of therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Arthralgia; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mutation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Oximes; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Retrospective Studies; Skin Diseases; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib; Young Adult

Patients with advanced melanoma have a poor prognosis. Since the discovery of BRAF mutations in cutaneous melanoma, new pharmacological agents have been developed to inhibit this target. Although the survival of patients with advanced melanoma has improved with BRAF inhibitors, the emergence of drug resistance and the high incidence of cutaneous side effects represent important limitations. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of cutaneous side effects between BRAF inhibitor monotherapy and BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination therapy in our cohort of patients. This study was a longitudinal prospective observational study. The study population comprised 83 patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma presenting with BRAF V600 mutation. The inclusion criteria included: age above 18 years, metastatic cutaneous melanoma or melanoma with high risk of metastasis, the presence of BRAF V600 mutation, and treatment with BRAF inhibitors or a combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors. The majority of patients developed skin toxicity during treatment. The most common cutaneous side effects were localized hyperkeratosis and verrucous keratosis. Other cutaneous side effects observed were photosensitivity, squamous cell carcinoma, and keratoacanthoma. Our results indicate that cutaneous side effects are generally observed during BRAF inhibitor monotherapy and are significantly different from those observed in patients treated with combination therapy.

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases; Melanoma; Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant; Mutation; Oximes; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Diseases; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

The cutaneous adverse effects of the BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib mesylate in the treatment of metastatic melanoma have been well reported. The addition of a MEK inhibitor to a BRAF inhibitor improves the blockade of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. The combination of dabrafenib with the MEK inhibitor trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide (CombiDT therapy) increases response rate and survival compared with a BRAF inhibitor alone. Clinical trials have suggested that CombiDT therapy induces fewer cutaneous toxic effects than a single-agent BRAF inhibitor. To our knowledge, a direct comparison has not been performed before.. To compare the cutaneous toxic effects of BRAF inhibitor monotherapy and CombiDT therapy in a large cohort of patients.. We performed a retrospective cohort study from September 1, 2009, through November 30, 2013. The study population included 185 Australian patients with unresectable stages IIIC and IV melanoma referred from Crown Princess Mary Cancer Care Centre who underwent review at the Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital. Of these, 119 patients received dabrafenib; 36, vemurafenib; and 30, CombiDT therapy. Data analysis were performed in December 2013.. Multiple cutaneous adverse effects between BRAF inhibitor monotherapy and CombiDT therapy were identified and compared in a cohort of patients who underwent the same dermatologic assessment.. The most common cutaneous adverse effects seen in patients receiving the single-agent BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib or vemurafenib included Grover disease (51 patients [42.9%] and 14 [38.9%], respectively [P = .67]), plantar hyperkeratosis (47 [39.5%] and 14 [38.9%], respectively [P = .95]), verrucal keratosis (79 [66.4%] and 26 [72.2%], respectively [P = .51]), and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (31 [26.1%] and 13 [36.1%], respectively [P = .54]). Photosensitivity was more common with vemurafenib (14 patients [38.9%]) compared with dabrafenib (1 [0.8%]; P < .001). Compared with dabrafenib, CombiDT therapy showed a higher frequency of folliculitis (12 patients [40.0%] vs. 8 [6.7%]; P < .001) and a significant decrease of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (0 vs. 31 [26.1%]; P < .001), verrucal keratosis (0 vs. 79 [66.4%]; P < .001), and Grover disease (0 vs. 51 [42.9%]; P < .001).. This study confirms that the prevalence of cutaneous toxic effects differs among vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and CombiDT therapies. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is the most concerning cutaneous toxic effect related to BRAF inhibitor monotherapy that did not appear with CombiDT therapy. Although CombiDT therapy has an improved profile of cutaneous toxic effects, continuous dermatologic assessments should be provided for all patients when receiving these treatments.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Oximes; Prevalence; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Retrospective Studies; Skin Diseases; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Fibrosis is a major socioeconomic burden, but effective antifibrotic therapies are not available in the clinical routine. There is growing evidence for a central role of Wnt signalling in fibrotic diseases such as systemic sclerosis, and we therefore evaluated the translational potential of pharmacological Wnt inhibition in experimental dermal fibrosis.. We examined the antifibrotic effects of PKF118-310 and ICG-001, two novel inhibitors of downstream canonical Wnt signalling, in the models of prevention and treatment of bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis as well as in experimental dermal fibrosis induced by adenoviral overexpression of a constitutively active transforming growth factor (TGF)-β receptor I.. PKF118-310 and ICG-001 were well tolerated throughout all experiments. Both therapeutic approaches showed antifibrotic effects in preventing and reversing bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis as measured by skin thickness, hydroxyproline content and myofibroblast counts. PKF118-310 and ICG-001 were effective in inhibiting TGF-β receptor I-driven fibrosis as assessed by the same outcome measures.. Blockade of canonical Wnt signalling by PKF118-310 and ICG-001 showed antifibrotic effects in different models of skin fibrosis. Both therapies were well tolerated. Although further experimental evidence for efficacy and tolerability is necessary, inhibition of canonical Wnt signalling is a promising treatment approach for fibrosis.

Topics: Animals; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Disease Models, Animal; Fibrosis; Mice; Mice, Inbred DBA; Pyrimidinones; Scleroderma, Systemic; Signal Transduction; Skin; Skin Diseases; Treatment Outcome; Triazines; Wnt Signaling Pathway

The cutaneous effects of rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma kinase B (BRAF) inhibitors are not well understood. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), keratoacanthoma, and photosensitivity have been described in patients taking BRAF inhibitors.. To characterize the timing and frequency of skin lesions in patients receiving BRAF inhibitor therapy, we utilized a retrospective case review of 53 patients undergoing treatment with BRAF inhibitors for 4-92 weeks of therapy. Patients were evaluated at baseline, and then followed at 4- to 12-week intervals. Charts were retrospectively reviewed, and the morphology and timing of cutaneous events were recorded.. Thirty-three of the 53 charts met exclusion/inclusion criteria, 15 were treated with vemurafenib, and 18 were treated with GSK 2118436/GSK 1120212. Of 33 patients treated with BRAF inhibitor, 13 developed photosensitivity (39.4%), 10 developed actinic keratoses (30.3%), 10 developed warts (30.3%), and 6 developed SCC (18.2%).. Multiple cutaneous findings were observed in the 33 patients taking BRAF inhibitors. The previously described association with SCC and photosensitivity was observed in these patients as well. Over half of the observed SCCs were invasive in nature. Photosensitivity continues to be frequent with BRAF inhibitors. Patients taking BRAF inhibitors should have regular full body skin exams. Further studies are necessary to better elucidate the rates of these adverse cutaneous effects.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Keratoacanthoma; Keratosis, Actinic; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Oximes; Photosensitivity Disorders; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Retrospective Studies; Skin Diseases; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib; Warts