pyrimidinones and Coronary-Disease

Pemirolast potassium, an antiallergic agent, has preventive effects against restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). This study investigated the mechanism of the preventive effects of pemirolast on restenosis using serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Initial elective PTCA was performed in consecutive 106 patients from March 1996 through August 1997. Patients with type C lesions or graft stenosis were excluded from the study. A total of 97 patients with 110 lesions, 48 patients (56 lesions) in the pemirolast treated group and 49 patients (54 lesions) in the control group were analyzed. Restenosis was defined as a diameter stenosis of > or = 50% at follow-up study. Patients in the pemirolast group received 20 mg/day from the morning after angioplasty until the time of follow-up (mean 6 months). The lumen cross-sectional area, vessel area, plaque area, and % plaque area were measured by quantitative coronary ultrasound and compared after PTCA and at follow-up between the patients without restenosis in the pemirolast (28 lesions) and control (27 lesions) groups. There was no significant change in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. Restenosis rate per lesion was significantly lower in the pemirolast group than in the control group (23.2% vs 44.4%, p < 0.05, respectively). After angioplasty and at follow-up study, there was no difference in lumen and vessel cross-sectional areas between the 2 groups. However, plaque and % plaque area in the pemirolast group were smaller than in the control group at follow-up study (8.9 +/- 2.3 vs 11.8 +/- 3.5 mm2, p < 0.005, 56.0 +/- 9.0% vs 64.0 +/- 10.4%, p < 0.005, respectively). These results suggest that suppression of neointimal hyperplasia is the preventive mechanism of pemirolast against restenosis after angioplasty. Pemirolast may be more effective against restenosis after coronary stenting.

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Endosonography; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Recurrence

We recently confirmed that pemirolast potassium, an antiallergic agent, markedly inhibits migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. It has also been reported that pemirolast inhibits intimal hyperplasia in animal experiments.. To elucidate the preventive effects of pemirolast on restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), 227 patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized trial. A total of 205 patients who were compatible with the protocol were analyzed (pemirolast group, 104 patients with 140 lesions; control group, 101 patients with 133 lesions). Patients in the pemirolast group received 20 mg/d of pemirolast from 1 week before PTCA until the time of follow-up angiography (4 months after PTCA). Angiographic restenosis was defined as diameter stenosis >/=50% at follow-up. Restenosis rates were significantly lower in the pemirolast group than in the control group (24.0% vs 46.5% of patients, 18.6% vs 35.3% of lesions, P <.01, respectively). During 8 months of follow-up, there were no coronary events (death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, or repeated PTCA) in 81.7% of the pemirolast group and in 63.4% of the control group (P =.013).. This study suggested that pemirolast would be useful in the clinical setting to prevent restenosis after PTCA.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cell Division; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Female; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Secondary Prevention

The purpose of the study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis comparing lopinavir with ritonavir (LPV/r) and atazanavir plus ritonavir (ATV+RTV) for antiretroviral-naïve patients with a baseline CD4+ T-cell distribution and total cholesterol (TC) profile as reported in the CASTLE study.. This decision analysis study used a previously published Markov model of HIV disease, incorporating coronary heart disease (CHD) events to compare the short- and long-term budget impacts and CHD consequences expected for the two regimens.. Patients were assumed to have a baseline CHD risk of 4.6% (based on demographic data) and it was also assumed that 50% of the population in the CASTLE study were smokers. The CHD risk differences (based on percent of patients with TC >240 mg/dL) in favor of ATV+RTV resulted in an average improvement in life expectancy of 0.031 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (11 days), and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,409,734/QALY. Use of the LPV/r regimen saved $24,518 and $36,651 at 5 and 10 years, respectively, with lifetime cost savings estimated at $38,490. A sensitivity analysis using a cohort of all smokers on antihypertensive medication estimated an average improvement in life expectancy of 31 quality-adjusted days in favor of ATV+RTV, and a cost-effectiveness ratio of $520,861/QALY: a ratio that is still above the acceptable limit within the US.. The use of an LPV/r-based regimen in antiretroviral-naïve patients with a baseline CHD risk similar to patients in the CASTLE study appears to be a more cost-effective use of resources compared with an ATV+RTV-based regimen. The very small added CHD risk predicted by LPV/r treatment is more than offset by the substantial short- and long-term cost savings expected with the use of LPV/r in antiretroviral-naïve individuals with average to moderately elevated CHD risk.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; Budgets; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Coronary Disease; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Life Expectancy; Lopinavir; Markov Chains; Models, Econometric; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ritonavir; Smoking; United States

The choice of initial highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) should take into account the need to balance efficacy, adverse event risk, resistance concerns for the treatment of HIV and treatment costs. Increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) may be of special concern in the selection of HAART therapy, because differences in potential CHD risk have been reported for different regimens. This study aimed to estimate the long-term combined effects of HIV disease and antiretroviral (ARV)-related risk for CHD on quality-adjusted survival and healthcare costs for ARV-naive patients.. A previously validated Markov model was updated and supplemented with the Framingham CHD risk equation. In the model, the average patient was male, aged 37 years and had a baseline 10-year CHD risk of 4.6%. Patients started with either lopinavir/ritonavir or unboosted atazanavir as the first protease inhibitor (PI). Clinical trial data were used to estimate the differences between these two therapies. The daily PI costs were $US18.52 for lopinavir/ritonavir and $US22.08 for atazanavir. Other costs were estimated from Medicaid billing databases and average wholesale drug price reports. All model costs were reported as the 2004 present value in US currency. The model's time horizon reflected a patient's lifetime, and the perspective of the analysis was that of the healthcare system and did not include indirect costs in the model cost estimates. Various CHD risk levels were tested in the sensitivity analysis.. In the base case, the model predicted a median duration of initial PI regimen of 5.6 years for lopinavir/ritonavir and 3.8 years for atazanavir. Over 10 years, patients who started on atazanavir had 30 additional AIDS events per 100 patients. Only 0.7 additional CHD events per 100 patients occurred for those who started on lopinavir/ritonavir. The model estimated 10-year total healthcare cost savings of $US12,543 per patient in the lopinavir/ritonavir group. The lifetime incremental cost effectiveness of lopinavir/ritonavir versus atazanavir was $US6797 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.. Lopinavir/ritonavir is a highly cost-effective regimen relative to atazanavir for the treatment of HIV. The effect of lopinavir/ritonavir on long-term CHD risk was minimal compared with the increased risk of AIDS/death projected for a less efficacious first PI regimen. The cost of lipid-lowering drugs and treatment of CHD for patients taking the lopinavir/ritonavir regimen was only 1.2% of the cost of AIDS care per person, which was too small to have a significant effect on the overall cost savings with lopinavir/ritonavir therapy. Thus, a decision to forgo potency and durability in an ARV regimen for an ARV-naive patient in favour of a less potent regimen with an improved lipid profile may prove to be costly over time, in terms of both budget impact and life expectancy.

Topics: Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Coronary Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Fees, Pharmaceutical; Health Care Costs; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Lopinavir; Markov Chains; Models, Statistical; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ritonavir; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Time Factors

To estimate the cost effectiveness and long-term combined effects of HIV disease and antiretroviral (ARV) therapy-related risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) on quality-adjusted survival and healthcare costs for ARV-experienced patients.. A previously validated Markov model was updated and supplemented with the Framingham CHD risk equation. The representative patient in the model was male, aged 37 years and had a baseline 10-year CHD risk of 4.6%. Patients started with either lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV+RTV) as the protease inhibitor (PI). The proportions of patients with viral suppression below 400 and 50 copies/mL, respectively, at week 48 reported in clinical trials were used to estimate the differences between these two therapies. The daily ARV costs were $US 24.60 for LPV/r capsules (2005 costs) and $US 26.54 for LPV/r tablets (2006 costs), $US 29.76 for ATV and $US 8.57 for ritonavir (2005 costs). Costs of other ARV drugs were taken from average wholesale drug reports for 2005. The cost of AIDS events was estimated from Medicaid billing databases and reflected a medical care system perspective and 2005 treatment costs. Cost-effectiveness calculations assumed a lifetime time horizon. The effects of different model assumptions were tested in a multiway sensitivity analysis by combining extreme values of parameters.. The model estimated a clinical and economic advantage to using LPV/r over ATV+RTV, which varied depending upon the use of LPV/r capsules or tablets. Using LPV/r capsules was comparatively beneficial for ARV-experienced patients in quality-adjusted life-months (QALMs) of 4.6 (corrected for differences in CHD risk) compared with ATV+RTV. In addition, there were 5- and 10-year overall per-patient cost savings of $US 17,995 and $US 21,298, respectively. Estimates for the LPV/r tablet formulation approved in 2005 (assuming similar efficacy) improved cost savings over 5- and 10-year periods to $US 19,598 and $US 23,126 per patient, respectively, because of a drug price differential. Sensitivity analysis tested numerous assumptions about the model cost and efficacy parameters and found that the results were robust to most changes. Model limitations were the uncertainty associated with the model parameters used.. LPV/r appears to be a highly cost-effective regimen relative to ATV+RTV for the treatment of HIV. The long-term CHD risk associated with LPV/r was minimal compared with the increased risk of AIDS/death and costs projected for a less efficacious PI-based regimen.

Topics: Adult; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Coronary Disease; Costs and Cost Analysis; Data Collection; Drug Combinations; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Lopinavir; Male; Markov Chains; Models, Statistical; Pyrimidinones; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ritonavir; Survival Analysis; United States; Viral Load

Selection of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for antiretroviral-experienced patients should involve balancing multiple factors, including clinical efficacy, adverse-event risk, resistance concerns, cost effectiveness and expected budget impact. The efficacy of a regimen and its durability, as demonstrated in controlled clinical trials, must be considered in the light of short- and long-term economic impacts on the healthcare system. These impacts may vary based on drug costs, costs of reported adverse effects, the regimen's likelihood of contributing to viral resistance to second-line therapies and the marginal cost differences between other healthcare resources used over a patient's lifetime. Risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) may be of concern in the selection of ART, because differences in CHD risk factors have been reported for different regimens, and heart disease is both a deadly and costly condition. This study set out to estimate the long-term combined effects of HIV disease and antiretroviral-related risk for CHD on quality-adjusted survival and healthcare costs for antiretroviral-experienced patients in the UK, Spain, Italy and France.. A previously validated Markov model was updated with 2006 cost estimates for each of the four countries and supplemented with the Framingham CHD risk equation. In the model, the average patient was male, aged 37 years, with a baseline 10-year CHD risk of 4.6%. Patients started with either lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV+RTV) as the protease inhibitor (PI). Clinical trial results, local drug costs and AIDS and CHD cost estimates were used to estimate the differences between these two therapies.. There was a significant advantage using LPV/r over ATV+RTV, which varied depending on the country's cost structure and assumptions related to drug efficacy. There was a comparative benefit for experienced patients in quality-adjusted life-months (QALM) of 4.6 (the net gain after subtracting quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] lost owing to CHD risk). In addition, there were 5- and 10-year overall cost savings of between euro947 and euro6594 per patient after 5 years, and an impact ranging from a cost increase of euro308 (for France) to a cost saving of euro7388 (for Spain) at year 10. The lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from dominant for Spain to euro11 856/QALY for Italy.. LPV/r was a highly cost-effective regimen relative to ATV+RTV for the treatment of HIV for each of the four countries examined in this study. The effect of LPV/r on long-term CHD risk was minimal compared with the increased risk of AIDS/death projected for a less efficacious PI-based regimen. The cost of lipid-lowering drugs and treatment for CHD was insignificant compared with the overall cost savings from LPV/r therapy. The choice of regimen for antiretroviral-experienced patients should be based on a regimen's expected efficacy and durability for countries with similar cost structure to those examined here.

Topics: Adult; Atazanavir Sulfate; Coronary Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; France; Health Care Costs; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Italy; Lopinavir; Male; Markov Chains; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk Factors; Ritonavir; Spain; Time Factors; United Kingdom

The preventive effect of pemirolast against restenosis after coronary stent placement was evaluated.. Eighty-four patients with 89 de novo lesions who underwent successful coronary stenting were assigned to the pemirolast group(40 patients, 45 lesions) and the control group(44 patients, 44 lesions). Administration of pemirolast(20 mg/day) was initiated from the next morning after stenting and continued for 6 months of follow-up. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed immediately after stenting and at follow-up. Angiographic restenosis was defined as diameter stenosis > or = 50% at follow-up. Intravascular ultrasound study conducted at follow-up angiography was used to measure vessel cross-sectional area(CSA), stent CSA, lumen CSA, neointima CSA(stent CSA--lumen CSA), and percentage neointima CSA(neointima CSA/stent CSA x 100%) at the minimal lumen site.. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Restenosis rate was significantly lower in the pemirolast group than in the control group(15.0% vs 34.1% of patients, 13.3% vs 34.1% of lesions, p < 0.05, respectively). The intravascular ultrasound study at follow-up(36 lesions in the pemirolast group, 33 in the control group) found no significant differences in vessel CSA and stent CSA between the two groups(17.3 +/- 2.2 vs 16.8 +/- 2.4 mm2, 8.6 +/- 1.9 vs 8.4 +/- 1.7 mm2, respectively). However, lumen CSA was significantly larger in the pemirolast group than in the control group(5.5 +/- 1.3 vs 4.4 +/- 1.1 mm2, p < 0.05). Moreover, neointima CSA and percentage neointima CSA were significantly smaller in the pemirolast group(3.1 +/- 1.1 vs 4.0 +/- 1.2 mm2, p < 0.05 and 36.2 +/- 15.9% vs 47.4 +/- 15.6%, p < 0.01).. Pemirolast has a preventive effect against restenosis after stent placement, possibly by inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anti-Allergic Agents; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Coronary Vessels; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pyridines; Pyrimidinones; Stents; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Intracellular [Na+], [H+], and [ATP] and mechanical performance were measured in the isovolumic perfused rat heart during ischemia. The concentration of intracellular sodium, [Na+]i, was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy under control conditions, and [Na+]i was monitored by 23Na NMR spectroscopy at 1-min intervals under control conditions and during global ischemia. [ATP], [H+], and [Pi] were measured by 31P NMR in a separate group under identical conditions. The control [Na+]i measured by atomic absorption was 30.7 +/- 3.3 mM (mean +/- SD, n = 6), and [Na+]i measured by NMR was 6.2 +/- 0.5 mM (n = 3). Brief ischemia (10 min) was associated with a 54% increase in [Na+]i which reversed completely with reperfusion. Developed pressure also returned to control values upon reperfusion. Prolonged ischemia (30 min) produced continuous further accumulation of sodium (0.53 mM/min, r2 = 0.99). [H+] also increased approximately linearly early in ischemia (0.084 microM/min, r2 = 0.97). The rate of increase in [Na+]i was more than 4000 times greater than the increase in [H+] on a molar basis. Nevertheless, [H+]/[Na+]i increased early in ischemia because the proportional change in [H+] was greater than that in [Na+]i. These results indicate that (1) intracellular sodium measured by NMR in the functioning heart is about 20% of total intracellular sodium; (2) intracellular acidosis and accumulation of sodium develop simultaneously during global ischemia; (3) increased intracellular sodium content is not in itself an indicator of irreversible injury; and (4) recovery of mechanical performance is associated with return of [Na+]i (measured by NMR) to baseline after brief ischemia. The mechanism of the increase in sodium content detected by NMR is unknown.

Topics: Animals; Coronary Disease; Heart; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Male; Myocardium; Oxazoles; Perfusion; Pyrimidinones; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Sodium; Spectrophotometry, Atomic; Thulium

Topics: Adult; Aged; Coronary Disease; Drug Evaluation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Pyrimidinones