pulmicort and Pain

Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a frequent postoperative complication. Preinduction budesonide inhalation is effective in POST prevention. However, it requires inhaler equipment and patient cooperation. Budesonide spraying on the endotracheal (ETT) cuff is simple and can be performed on most patients requiring endotracheal intubation. This study aims to compare the effects of budesonide spray and K-Y gel as an ETT cuff lubricant on the incidence and severity of POST.. Randomized and triple-blinded study.. One hundred patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery were randomly allocated into the budesonide group (n = 50) and the K-Y gel group (n = 50). In the budesonide group, 200 mcg of budesonide was sprayed on the cuff of the ETT. For the K-Y gel group, the ETT cuff was lubricated with K-Y gel. A visual analog scale was used to assess the severity of POST at 2, 6, and 24 hours after surgery. Other complications of tracheal intubation and adverse effects of budesonide were also recorded.. Compared to the K-Y gel group, the budesonide group had a significantly lower overall incidence of POST (30% versus 54%, P = .032) and reduced the risk of POST by 24% (relative risk reduction = 24%, 95% CI, 5.23-42.77, P = .012) as well as the incidence of hoarseness (8.6% vs 34%, P = .001) and cough (0% vs 8%, P = 0.041). No incidence of drug-related side effects was reported in both groups.. Spraying budesonide on the ETT cuff significantly reduces the incidence and severity of POST.

Topics: Budesonide; Hoarseness; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Pain; Pharyngitis; Postoperative Complications

Quantification of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) symptoms is crucial for assessing treatment outcomes. We aimed to explore the effect of budesonide oral suspension (BOS) on dysphagia and pain with swallowing.. We performed a secondary analysis of data from a phase 2 multicenter, double-blind, trial (conducted from July 2012 through October 2014) of patients with EoE, 11-40 y old, who were randomly assigned to groups given placebo or BOS (2.0 mg twice daily) for 12 weeks. Symptoms were quantified using the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) from baseline to week 12 of therapy.. Overall, 93 patients were randomly assigned to groups; the prespecified modified intention-to-treat analysis set comprised 87 patients (38 from the placebo group and 49 from the BOS group). Improvements from baseline in least-squares mean (standard error) DSQ (Q2+Q3) scores were observed. The difference between groups was statistically significant only at week 12 (placebo vs BOS: week 4, -4.9 [1.7] vs -7.4 [1.5]; P = .265; week 8, -7.4 [2.1] vs -10.3 [1.8]; P = .288; week 12, -7.5 [1.9] vs -14.3 [1.7]; P = .01). Similar findings were observed for pain (Q4) scores (placebo vs BOS: week 4, -2.5 [0.8] vs -3.3 [0.7]; P = .484; week 8, -3.0 [0.8] vs -4.9 [0.7]; P = .066; week 12, -3.1 [0.8] vs -4.9 [0.7]; P = .109). More severe DSQ and DSQ+pain scores were associated with presence of other symptoms (such as regurgitation) and physician-rated severity. Improvements in DSQ and DSQ+pain scores were greater in patients with either a histologic or endoscopic response than in patients without a response.. In a secondary analysis of data from a phase 2 trial of patients with EoE, we found evidence for improvements in dysphagia and pain scores in patients who received BOS (2.0 mg twice daily) vs placebo. Pain with swallowing should be considered in the clinical assessment of patients with EoE. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01642212.

Topics: Budesonide; Deglutition; Deglutition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Humans; Pain; Treatment Outcome