pulmicort and Eosinophilic-Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, local immune-mediated inflammatory oesophageal disease. Although Budesonide is recommended as one of the first-line drugs for EoE treatment, its efficacy is still controversial in multiple studies. Due to the continuous emergence of new and reliable research evidence in recent years, we updated the meta-analysis using RCT trial results to evaluate the efficacy and safety of budesonide.. Retrieve the data of the randomised controlled trial literature from 2000 to June 20, 2021, on using Budesonide in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis from the three major databases. Based on the results achieved with the Cochrane risk assessment tool, evaluate the quality of the included literature to extract the data, and perform the Meta-analysis with RevMan5.4 and Stata15.0.. A total of 958 articles were retrieved, with 10 articles finally included, thus forming a sample size of 712 cases. The main outcome indicators of the meta-analysis are as follows: (1) Histological remission: the Budesonide group performs better than the placebo control group when it comes to histological remission of injuries [RR = 23.82, 95%CI = (13.46, 42.21),. More and more high-quality randomised controlled trials show that oral budesonide in the treatment of eosinophils esophagitis was better than the placebo group. Mounting high-quality RCTs have confirmed the efficacy of oral budesonide in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis and that the effects of this drug may not be so dose-dependent. It is safe to take budesonide for a long time, and this drug is a relatively ideal option for drug treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis at present, so it is worthy of clinical application.Key MessagesWe used high-quality randomised controlled trials to meta-update the previous results to further confirm the clinical efficacy and safety of budesonide.Oral budesonide in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis is significantly better than the placebo control group. We have confirmed the value of its clinical application and promotion by including more high-quality randomised controlled trials.We also found that the efficacy of budesonide in patients is not dose-dependent, and more research is needed to confirm this.

Topics: Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Leukocyte Count; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease of the esophagus that affects an estimated 34.4/100 000 people in Europe and North America. EoE affects both children and adults, and causes dysphagia, food impaction of the esophagus, and esophageal strictures.. EoE is defined by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction, such as vomiting, dysphagia, or feeding difficulties, in a patient with an esophageal biopsy demonstrating at least 15 eosinophils per high-power field in the absence of other conditions associated with esophageal eosinophilia such as gastroesophageal reflux disease or achalasia. Genetic factors and environmental factors, such as exposure to antibiotics early in life, are associated with EoE. Current therapies include proton pump inhibitors; topical steroid preparations, such as fluticasone and budesonide; dietary therapy with amino acid formula or empirical food elimination; and endoscopic dilation. In a systematic review of observational studies that included 1051 patients with EoE, proton pump inhibitor therapy was associated with a histologic response, defined as less than 15 eosinophils per high-power field on endoscopic biopsy, in 41.7% of patients, while placebo was associated with a 13.3% response rate. In a systematic review of 8 randomized trials of 437 patients with EoE, topical corticosteroid treatment was associated with histologic remission in 64.9% of patients compared with 13.3% for placebo. Patients with esophageal narrowing may require dilation. Objective assessment of therapeutic response typically requires endoscopy with biopsy.. EoE has a prevalence of approximately 34.4/100 000 worldwide. Treatments consist of proton pump inhibitors, topical steroids, elemental diet, and empirical food elimination, with esophageal dilation reserved for patients with symptomatic esophageal narrowing.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Amino Acids; Budesonide; Capsules; Combined Modality Therapy; Deglutition Disorders; Dilatation; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Esophagoscopy; Esophagus; Fluticasone; Food Hypersensitivity; Gene-Environment Interaction; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors

Topical corticosteroids (TS) have become standard therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, a variety of drug formulations have been used for which results of histological and clinical responses may be different. We aimed at determining the short-term histologic efficacy of TS for EoE based on randomized placebo-controlled trials and to review clinical response.. We searched MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on TS versus placebo for active EoE published until June 2019. Treatment effects were calculated as risk ratios (RRs) comparing histologic remission between groups.. Nine RCTs (6 budesonide and 3 fluticasone) involving a total of 483 participants were included. A substantial overall effect of TS on acute histologic remission (RR 12.5, 95% confidence interval 6.0-25.9) was found despite varying definitions of histologic response. Indirect comparisons between drug and formulation types showed a trend for a better histologic efficacy of budesonide (RR 13.5 vs. 10.4 fluticasone) and for the orodispersible tablet (RR 46.2 vs. 11.5 suspension, and 10.4 nebulized formula/spray), but only based on small patient numbers. Scores used for clinical response assessment were different between studies, and short-term clinical results were less impressive: significant differences favoring TS were found in 4/9 RCTs (4/6 budesonide, 0/3 fluticasone).. TS are effective for short-term induction of histological remission in EoE with less impressive clinical response rates. The mode of drug delivery to the esophagus may be a relevant factor for the degree of histologic remission. Further trials should use uniform assessment criteria and long-term patient-centered outcomes.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Fluticasone; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Despite advances in the pathologic understanding of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), as of yet, no single agent has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat EoE. Off-label, EoE is currently treated by using the 3 Ds: drugs (particularly swallowed topical corticosteroids), dietary restriction, and endoscopic dilation. In the recent past, considerable progress in terms of EoE treatment has been made: (1) new EoE-specific steroid formulations optimizing mucosal deposition have been developed, which has culminated in recent approval of a budesonide effervescent tablet in Europe; (2) biologics used for other T

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Budesonide; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Off-Label Use

Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated, chronic inflammatory disorder of the esophagus. Topical steroids have been used in the management of EoE for over 15 years. However, there are no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug therapies for EoE.. This review discusses the current understanding of EoE and the role of topical steroids in the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with EoE. We performed a comprehensive review of the literature, summarized randomized control trials from 2006 to 2020, and provided a simplified management algorithm for EoE.. In patients with EoE, topical steroids are effective in inducing clinical and histologic remission. Formulations of topical steroids that maximize the exposure to esophageal mucosa have the highest efficacy. A majority of patients who achieve remission with topical steroids develop clinical and histologic relapse off therapy within a year. Current evidence suggests that maintenance therapy with long-term topical steroids decreases the risk of relapse and progression to fibrostenotic disease. While uncertainty over the dose and duration of maintenance topical steroids and their potential side effects exists, long-term maintenance therapy with topical steroids appears to be the way forward to improve long-term outcomes in patients with EoE.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Endpoint Determination; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Fluticasone; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an emerging chronic local immune-mediated disease of the esophagus. Beside proton pump inhibitors and food-restriction-diets swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC) can be offered as a first line therapy according to current guidelines. This review describes the background and practical management of STCs in EoE. So far, mainly asthma inhalers containing either budesonide or fluticasone have been administered to the esophagus by swallowing these medications "off label". Recently esophagus-targeted formulations of topical steroids have been developed showing clinicopathological response rates up to 85% - an orodispersible tablet of budesonide has been approved as the first "in label" medication for EoE in Europe in June 2018. Whereas it was shown that disease remission induction of EoE by STCs is highly effective, there is still a lack of data regarding long-term and maintenance therapy. However, current studies on STC maintenance therapy add some movement into the game.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Budesonide; Deglutition; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Europe; Humans

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a unique form of non-IgE-mediated food allergy characterised by oesophageal eosinophilic infiltration. The prevalence of EoE has grown to currently represent the first cause of dysphagia and food impaction in children and young adults. Avoiding food triggers is the only therapy targeting the cause of the disease, but none of the currently available food allergy tests adequately predicts food triggers for EoE. Strategies based on the empirical elimination of food are the most effective and convenient in clinical practice. Proton pump inhibitors constitute an effective first-line therapy in half of patients, through a direct anti-inflammatory effect independent of its action on gastric acid secretion. Topical glucocorticosteroids budesonide and fluticasone reduce eosinophilic inflammation and reverse symptoms. This review includes the most relevant aspects of the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of eosinophilic oesophagitis.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Deglutition Disorders; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Evidence-Based Practice; Fluticasone; Humans; Inflammation; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Young Adult

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a disease that has been recognized in the past 30 years. It causes dysphagia and other symptoms of oesophageal dysfunction. Eosinophilic oesophagitis presents either with a chronic feeling of difficulty swallowing, with food moving slowly through the oesophagus, or as an acute food bolus obstruction requiring emergency attention. Patients may also experience chest pain at this time. It is an inflammatory disorder, thought to be driven by food or environmental antigens, where the most distinctive cell type is eosinophils. Eosinophilic oesophagitis is mediated through a local IgG4 mechanism and does not manifest as a systemic disease. It is diagnosed only on endoscopy and biopsy - there are characteristic endoscopic appearances with oedema, rings, furrows and strictures but the golden rule in its diagnosis is to perform multiple biopsies from multiple sites in the oesophagus in all patients with dysphagia or other oesophageal dysfunction. Finding a peak concentration of >15 eosinophils per high power field in this situation is diagnostic of eosinophilic oesophagitis. Eosinophilic oesophagitis is not usually related to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, but the two conditions may co-exist. Current therapies include topical steroids (oro-dispersible formulation of budesonide), proton pump inhibitors and dietary exclusions. Therapeutic oesophageal dilatation is reserved for refractory symptoms or tight strictures.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Biopsy; Budesonide; Deglutition Disorders; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Esophageal Perforation; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagoscopy; Esophagus; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Quality of Life

In order to provide a comparative evaluation of available pharmacologic treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), we conducted a network meta-analysis.. A variety of pharmacologic treatments for EoE have been reported, however there exists a paucity of direct comparisons.. We searched randomized controlled trials using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database through December 2014. Studies were analyzed using a random-effects network meta-analysis to identify the most effective therapy. Subgroup analysis was performed among studies that excluded gastroesophageal reflux disease or proton-pump inhibitor responsive esophageal eosinophilia, and also among pediatric and adult populations. The ranking probability for the efficacy of each treatment was analyzed. Consistency of the included randomized controlled trials was checked by applying inconsistency and node-splitting models.. Eleven studies of a total of 456 patients were identified. Six pharmacologic treatments (budesonide suspension and viscous, fluticasone, prednisone, esomeprazole, and mepolizumab) and placebo were included in our analysis. Meta-analysis showed superiority of budesonide viscous, budesonide suspension, and fluticasone over placebo. Network meta-analysis demonstrated the rank order of efficacy as budesonide viscous, esomeprazole, prednisone, budesonide suspension, fluticasone, mepolizumab, and placebo. The results were consistent from the inconsistency model analysis and node-splitting analysis. Subgroup analysis demonstrated prednisone, budesonide suspension, and esomeprazole were the most effective when network meta-analyses were performed among studies that excluded gastroesophageal reflux disease or proton-pump inhibitor responsive esophageal eosinophilia, and among pediatric and adult populations, respectively.. On the basis of this network meta-analysis, viscous budesonide was shown to be the most effective pharmacologic therapy for EoE among the reported pharmacologic treatments.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esomeprazole; Female; Fluticasone; Gastrointestinal Agents; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Infant; Male; Middle Aged; Prednisone; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is defined as a chronic, immune-medicated or antigen-mediated, esophageal disease, characterized clinically by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and histologically by eosinophil-predominant inflammation. Food allergens are identified in most patients. Treatment strategies include elimination diets, drugs, and esophageal dilation. This article focuses on pharmacologic treatment. Currently, there is no pharmacologic treatment that has been approved by regulatory authorities. Established pharmacologic options to treat EoE include proton pump inhibitors and swallowed topical steroids. Several biologic therapies are currently under evaluation and some of them have shown promising results in improving biologic endpoints and patient-reported outcomes.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Fluticasone; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Pregnenediones; Proton Pump Inhibitors

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an immune/antigen-driven inflammation that causes esophageal dysfunction. Budesonide has shown promising effect in the management of EE in multiple studies, and we therefore conducted this systematic review/meta-analysis to assess budesonide efficacy and safety in order to provide more updated and robust evidence.. In April 2018, we conducted a systematic electronic search through four databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (ISI), and Cochrane Central. All original studies reporting the efficacy of budesonide in the treatment of EE were included in our meta-analysis. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was employed to assess the risk of bias among included randomized controlled trials, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for non-randomized studies.. A total of 12 studies including 555 participants were included in our review. Budesonide showed marked efficacy at the level of histological response compared to placebo [risk ratio (RR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) 11.93 (4.82-29.50); p > 0.001]. Analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies revealed considerable reduction in eosinophil count, with a mean difference (MD) (95% CI) of - 69.41 (- 105.31 to - 33.51; p < 0.001) and 46.85 (33.93-59.77; p < 0.001), respectively. Similarly, there was a marked improvement in the clinical symptoms via the analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies, with an RR (95% CI) of 1.72 (1.22-2.41; p = 0.002) and MD (95% CI) of 2.45 (0.76-4.15; p = 0.005), respectively.. Budesonide showed significant effect at all treatment endpoints. However, since budesonide carries a risk of candidiasis and our inferences are based only on a small number of included studies, more research is warranted to clarify these results.

Topics: Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated relapsing disease caused by eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa which is normally lacking these cells. EoE belongs to the group of the so called Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders (EGIDs). From a rare and unusual disease, EoE has become an emerging entity and in recent years its incidence and prevalence have increased all over the world, also in children. The pathogenesis is very complex and still not completely clear. Esophageal disfunction symptoms (e.g. dysphagia and food impaction) represent the typical manifestation of EoE and this condition could be difficult to recognize, more in pediatric age than in adults. Moreover, symptoms can often overlap with those of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), leading to a delayed diagnosis. EoE is often related to atopy and an allergological evaluation is recommended. Untreated EoE could provoke complications such as strictures, esophageal rings, narrowing of the esophagus. Diagnosis is confirmed by the demonstration in biopsy specimens obtained through upper endoscopy of eosinophilic inflammation (>15 for high powered field) of the esophageal mucosa and other histological features. Other tests could be useful not specifically for the diagnosis, but for the characterization of the subtype of EoE. Since EoE incidence and knowledge about physiopathology and natural history have increased, the goal of the review is to provide some helpful tools for the correct management in pediatric age together with an overview about epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical, diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

Topics: Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Age of Onset; Budesonide; Cell Movement; Child; Child, Preschool; Cytokines; Dilatation; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Esophagoscopy; Feeding Behavior; Food Hypersensitivity; Food, Formulated; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Proton Pump Inhibitors

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus, which requires short- and long-term treatment. In addition, patients under long-term treatment for any chronic condition should have a structured follow-up. The mainstays in EoE treatment are drugs (such as swallowed topical corticosteroids [STC] and proton pump inhibitors), dietary exclusions, and endoscopic dilations. STC are the most widely used treatment and have proven efficacy in inducing clinical, endoscopic and histological remission in active EoE. However, data regarding maintaining disease remission and long-term management are limited. Ongoing disease activity and relapses despite STC treatment are frequently observed. This sheds light on the urgent need for adequate maintenance strategies, which have not been well defined. In terms of follow-up concepts, to date neither guidelines nor consensus recommendations have been published. To summarize the current knowledge on long-term diagnostic and therapeutic STC management of EoE, we conducted a literature search using PubMed and Embase applying the following key search items: Eosinophilic esophagitis, eosinophils, esophagus, swallowed topical corticosteroids, fluticasone, budesonide, long-term, treatment, therapy, and follow-up. In addition, we present empirically developed long-term management concepts applied at two large EoE centers, with a special focus on STC treatments. Finally, we highlight areas of future research and perspectives regarding the long-term management of EoE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Budesonide; Chronic Disease; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Esophagoscopy; Esophagus; Fluticasone; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a diagnosis that is being made more frequently in the assessment of dysphagia in both adults and children. It is unclear whether this is a result of increased prevalence or improved diagnostic methods. Children present commonly to paediatric institutions with foreign body impaction. Research indicates that food impaction may predispose to eosinophilic oesophagitis. This article presents eosinophilic oesophagitis from an otolaryngologist's point of view. It details the clinical features present in the disease as well as how it is diagnosed and managed. It illustrates early signs of eosinophilic oesophagitis so that primary physicians and emergency physicians know when to refer on to otolaryngologists.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Deglutition Disorders; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Esophagus; Fluticasone; Foreign Bodies; Humans; Otolaryngology

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathologic condition characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction in the presence of eosinophil-predominant inflammation of esophageal mucosa. Topical steroids are recommended as first line pharmacologic therapy in EoE. We aimed to determine the efficacy of topical steroids in inducing histologic and clinical remission in children and adults with EoE.. We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane library databases for studies investigating the efficacy of topical steroids in EoE. We collected data on the number of patients, dose and duration of therapy, complete and partial histological response, and clinical improvement. We performed meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials using Review Manager version 5.2. We used funnel plots to evaluate for publication bias.. Five studies that included 174 patients with EoE were included in the meta-analysis. Topical fluticasone was administered in three studies involving 114 patients, and topical budesonide in two studies involving 60 patients. Patients treated with topical steroids, as compared with placebo, had higher complete histological remission (odds ratio [OR] 20.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.03, 61.63) and partial histological remission (OR 32.20, 95% CI 6.82, 152.04). There was a trend towards improvement in clinical symptoms with topical steroids as compared with placebo but it did not reach statistical significance (OR 2.72, 95 %CI 0.90, 8.23).. Topical corticosteroids seem to be effective in inducing histological remission but may not have similar significant impact in improving clinical symptoms of EoE. Studies with large sample size are needed to uniformly validate symptom improvement in EoE.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Budesonide; Chi-Square Distribution; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Mucosa; Esophagus; Fluticasone; Humans; Odds Ratio; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Steroids; Treatment Outcome

Controversy surrounds the clinical and histological response to topical steroids in patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE).. To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to assess the efficacy of topical steroids compared with placebo or proton pump inhibitor (PPIs) for the management of eosinophilic oesophagitis.. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and MEDLINE from inception to 1 July 2015 was searched. Data were extracted independently by two authors. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A network meta-analysis was performed using the Bayesian methods under random-effects multiple treatment comparisons. Results were summarised as odds ratio along with credibility intervals. We also calculated the ranking probability for each treatment based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).. The overall methodological quality of included studies was low. SUCRA ranking probability indicated that PPI had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving histological remission and mean change in eosinophils (0.81 and 0.85, respectively), followed by budesonide (0.74 and 0.63, respectively) and fluticasone (0.5 and 0.5, respectively). None of the comparisons indicated a statistically signicant difference.. The results from network meta-analysis show that there is no statistically significant difference between PPI, budesonide and fluticasone for the treatment of EoE as assessed by the histological and clinical response. The evidence is limited by serious risk of bias and imprecision, which emphasises the urgent need for large RCTs with adequate sample size and methodological rigour to provide conclusive evidence.

Topics: Bayes Theorem; Budesonide; Drug Administration Routes; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Fluticasone; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Steroids

There are currently limited data on the management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) during pregnancy. At our center, however, we have followed several pregnant women with EoE and others have asked pertinent questions in pre-pregnancy counseling. The relatively young age of patients with EoE implies that many practitioners will also encounter patients with these questions. In this review, we use four cases to prompt a discussion about concerns focused on the safety of steroids and diet therapy during pregnancy and breast-feeding, potential nutritional risks with dietary elimination, how to optimize therapy, and whether endoscopic evaluation for monitoring of disease activity is safe during pregnancy and breast-feeding. An additional concern is whether the disease could progress during pregnancy and breast-feeding if no therapies are used. Although there are no studies specifically examining pregnant EoE patients, we have reviewed the literature relevant to this population as informed by the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease patients during pregnancy, where these issues have been studied in more depth. Providers who care for EoE patients who could become pregnant should familiarize themselves with these issues.

Topics: Adult; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Young Adult

Esophagitis is the end result of a variety of insults to epithelial homeostasis. Eosinophilic esophagitis is a manifestation of non-IgE-mediated food allergy that most commonly affects the esophagus of males who have other atopic phenomena. Reflux esophagitis reflects repeated exposure to acidic gastric contents because of failure of the normal protections afforded by the LES. Because certain histologic features can be present in either condition, endoscopic biopsy alone does not distinguish them. Their symptoms overlap, but the treatment options are very different, such that making a formal diagnosis by following consensus guidelines is essential. A treatment protocol designed to manage the inflammation by controlling the provocative factors (acid for GERD and food antigens for EoE) or suppressing the inflammation (ie, topical steroids for EoE) should result in normalization of the mucosa and resolution of symptoms. Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic condition that rarely remits spontaneously, so any therapeutic modality will need to be continued indefinitely.

Topics: Adolescent; Budesonide; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal pH Monitoring; Esophagitis, Peptic; Fluticasone; Fundoplication; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Glucocorticoids; Histamine H2 Antagonists; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the oesophagus, characterized by symptoms of dysphagia or food bolus obstruction. Diagnosis is supported by typical histological findings. This article covers pertinent aspects of the disease, pathogenic explanations and treatment options.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Cytokines; Deglutition Disorders; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagoscopy; Fluticasone; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Th2 Cells

The most important novel findings presented on oesophageal disease in DDW 2015 were the following: 1) GERD: a) hypervigilance seems to be a key pathogenic factor in reflux symptoms refractory to PPI; b) post-reflux swallowing-induced peristaltic waves could be an excellent diagnostic criterion for GERD; c) laryngeal pH-metry is not useful in the diagnosis of extra-oesophageal symptoms; d) the recommendation of weight loss adequately recorded in the clinical reports of patients with GERD and obesity or overweight is an excellent quality indicator and is associated with better outcomes. 2) Barrett's oesophagus: a) persistent low-grade dysplasia in more than one endoscopy and a diagnosis of "indefinite for dysplasia" are associated with a high risk of neoplastic progression; b) narrow-band imaging allows areas of dysplasia on Barrett's oesophagus to be identified with high sensitivity and specificity; c) initial endoscopy fails to identify a high percentage of advanced neoplasms in Barrett's oesophagus. Early re-endoscopy should be considered; d) endoscopists specialized in Barret's oesophagus obtain a much higher yield in the diagnosis of advanced lesions. Patients at high risk-men, older patients, smokers and those with long-segment Barrett's oesophagus-could benefit from follow-up in a referral center. 3) Achalasia: POEM seems safe and effective, independently from patient characteristics (age, comorbidity) and the technical variations used. 4) Eosinophilic esophagitis: topical budesonide and exclusion diets are reasonably effective in PPI non-responders.

Topics: Anxiety; Barrett Esophagus; Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Progression; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Achalasia; Esophageal Diseases; Esophageal Neoplasms; Esophagoscopy; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment; Weight Loss

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is defined as a chronic immune/antigen-mediated esophageal disease characterized by clinical symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and histologically by eosinophil-predominant infiltration of the esophagus mucosa. Treatment of EoE should therefore lead to improvement of clinical symptoms and a histological decrease of eosinophilic inflammation. Topical corticosteroids (tCS; fluticasone, budesonide) have been demonstrated to be effective in treating EoE and therefore represent first-line therapy. To date, there is no approved therapy in the world for EoE. This is the reason why EoE patients are treated with medication such as inhalers or aqueous nebulizer solutions, which have to be swallowed. After administration, patients are not allowed to eat or drink for 45 min in order for the esophagus to become well coated so that the topical anti-inflammatory effect is maximized. For adults there are different dose ranges: fluticasone propionate 440-880 μg/day twice daily, budesonide 2 mg/day divided dose for inducing remission over a period of 4 to 8 weeks. Since EoE is a chronic disease known to relapse after termination of medication, maintenance therapy seems to be valuable, but there is no evidence from controlled studies with long-term follow-up. In several randomized trials, both tCS have been able to show a good safety profile. Candida esophagitis and oral candidiasis present the most common side effects of topical steroid therapy. At the moment, no data about tCS and long-term safety in EoE are available.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Androstadienes; Animals; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Fluticasone; Humans

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EO) is an immune/antigen mediated, chronic, relapsing disease characterised by dysphagia, food bolus impaction and a dense oesophageal eosinophilic infiltrate. Characteristic endoscopic features include corrugated rings, linear furrows and white exudates, but none are diagnostic. Despite its increasing prevalence, EO remains underdiagnosed. There is a strong association with other atopic conditions. Symptoms, histology and endoscopic findings can overlap with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Currently endoscopy and oesophageal biopsies are the investigation of choice. Oesophageal physiology studies, endoscopic ultrasound, impedance planimetry and serology may have a role in the diagnosis and monitoring of response to therapy. Acid reducing medication is advocated as first line or adjuvant therapy. Dietary therapy is comprised of elimination diets or can be guided by allergen assessment. In adults, topical corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy. Endoscopic dilatation is safe and effective for the treatment of non-responsive strictures. Other therapeutic options (immunomodulators, biological agents, leukotriene receptor antagonists) are under investigation.

Topics: Acetates; Administration, Inhalation; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biopsy; Budesonide; Cyclopropanes; Deglutition Disorders; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Feeding Behavior; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Male; Quinolines; Sulfides

Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) frequently experience gastrointestinal symptoms including nausea, emesis, malnutrition and indigestion; diseases such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), distal intestinal obstructive syndrome, and cholelithiasis are commonly implicated. We have recently diagnosed eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in three patients with CF. EoE is a TH-2 driven, allergen-mediated disease which causes esophageal eosinophilia and presents with symptoms of nausea, feeding intolerance, regurgitation, and dysphagia. EoE is diagnosed when esophageal biopsies reveal greater than 15 eosinophils per high power field in the setting of the appropriate clinical scenario and after exclusion of other causes of esophageal eosinophilia. Although described with increasing frequently in the gastrointestinal literature, there have been no prior cases documenting the co-existence of EoE and CF. We speculate that this is related to lack of familiarity with EoE symptoms by CF providers. We present three patients with CF diagnosed with EoE and review the current literature regarding diagnosis and management, focusing on management issues in patients with CF.

Topics: Adolescent; Budesonide; Child, Preschool; Cystic Fibrosis; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Prognosis

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a clinicopathologic disease that can present with a constellation of upper gastrointestinal symptoms and endoscopic findings in conjunction with significant infiltration of the esophageal tissue with eosinophils. Clinical and histologic resolution of the disease can be seen with dietary restriction therapies and systemic and topical corticosteroids. Because most patients have an atopic background and the disease seems to have an underlying T-helper type 2 pathogenesis, allergists and gastroenterologists need to be familiar with the diagnosis and management of this disease. In this review, clinical characteristics, endoscopic and histologic findings, and available therapy options are discussed.

Topics: Age Factors; Androstadienes; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Esophagus; Fluticasone; Food; Food Hypersensitivity; Humans; Sex Factors

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a clinicopathological disease characterized by oesophageal eosinophilia and gastrointestinal symptoms. Currently, the optimal treatment regimens remain unclear. The pathogenesis of eosinophilic oesophagitis appears to involve immune dysregulation, while acid reflux may have a secondary role; the mainstays in treatment are aimed principally at these dual processes. While a trial of a PPI is worthwhile it is likely that PPI therapy is treating concurrent acid reflux rather than true eosinophilic oesophagitis. Dietary elimination with elemental feed is safe but poorly tolerated. Swallowed topical steroids are the mainstay of commercially available therapies. Both fluticasone and budesonide have been proven to be beneficial both symptomatically and in reducing oesophageal eosinophil counts in the short and medium term. Basic studies have determined a role for IL-5 in oesophageal remodelling in eosinophilic esophagitis. Initial clinical studies have shown single or multiple infusions of monoclonal antibody to IL-5 to be well tolerated and to cause a long-term decrease in both peripheral and sputum eosinophil count in these eosinophil driven conditions. At present, swallowed corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis in patients failing PPI therapy. Studies have been heterogenous in their diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic oesophagitis and in the definition of response to therapy, making comparison of results difficult.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Androstadienes; Budesonide; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Fluticasone; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors

Over the course of the last year, a number of studies have brought new insights into the clinical presentation, pathogenesis, and treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis, some of which will be summarized here.. This swell of research and clinical need resulted in revision of the 2007 Consensus Recommendations. In addition, new insights into key clinicopathological features including symptoms such as feeding dysfunction and histological quantification of eosinophil extracellular granules are presented. The advancement of the field is strongly supported by blinded and placebo-controlled studies of IL-5 and oral viscous budesonide as well as new large studies examining the safety of dilation.. Overall, these studies set the stage for new methodologies to understand the pathophysiology of eosinophilic esophagitis and development of novel therapies.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagus; Humans

Questions remain regarding the safety of swallowed topical corticosteroids in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE).. To assess the safety of an investigational formulation of budesonide (budesonide oral suspension; BOS) from six trials.. Safety data were integrated from six trials (healthy adults: SHP621-101 [phase 1]; patients with EoE: MPI 101-01 and MPI 101-06 [phase 2]; SHP621-301, SHP621-302 and SHP621-303 [phase 3]) for participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug (BOS 2.0 mg twice daily [b.i.d.], BOS any dose [including BOS 2.0 mg b.i.d.] and placebo). Adverse events (AEs), laboratory testing, bone density and adrenal AEs were assessed. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates were calculated for AEs and AEs of special interest (AESIs).. Overall, 514 unique participants were included (BOS 2.0 mg b.i.d., n = 292; BOS any dose, n = 448; placebo, n = 168). The BOS 2.0 mg b.i.d., BOS any dose and placebo groups totalled 93.7, 122.4 and 25.0 participant-years of exposure (PY), respectively. Proportions of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and AESIs (any) reported were higher for BOS than placebo; however, most were mild/moderate in severity. The most commonly reported AESIs (exposure-adjusted incidence rates [per 100 PY]) in the BOS 2.0 mg b.i.d., BOS any dose and placebo groups were infections (133.5, 154.4 and 136.2, respectively) and gastrointestinal AEs (84.3, 80.9 and 92.1, respectively). Adrenal AEs were more frequent with BOS 2.0 mg b.i.d. and BOS any dose than placebo (44.8, 34.3 and 24.0, respectively). TEAEs and AESIs related to study drug or leading to discontinuation were infrequent.. BOS was well-tolerated; most TEAEs with BOS were mild/moderate in severity.. SHP621-101 (no clinical trials registration number), MPI 101-01 (NCT00762073), MPI 101-06 (NCT01642212), SHP621-301 (NCT02605837), SHP621-302 (NCT02736409) and SHP621-303 (NCT03245840).

Topics: Adult; Budesonide; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Suspensions

A high prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been reported in children with repaired esophageal atresia (EA). Topical steroids proved to be an effective and safe therapy in EoE, although not approved in pediatrics. We report the results of the first clinical trial of oral viscous budesonide (OVB) performed in children with EoE after repaired esophageal atresia (EoE-EA).. This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial with randomized pharmacokinetic sampling, was conducted at the Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital between September 2019 and June 2021. EoE-EA patients received an age-banded dose of OVB twice daily for 12 weeks and were endoscopically evaluated. The primary endpoint was the rate of patients achieving histological remission. Secondary endpoints included clinical and endoscopic benefit after treatment, and safety assessments.. Eight consecutive EA-EoE patients were enrolled (median age 9.1 years, interquartile range 5.5). Of these, 5 received 0.8 mg and 3 received 1.0 mg twice daily of OVB. Histological remission was obtained in all but 1 patient (87.5%). The clinical score showed significant improvement at the end of treatment in all patients. No endoscopic features of EoE were found after treatment. No treatment-emergent adverse event occurred.. OVB is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated formulation of budesonide for use in pediatric patients with EoE-EA.

Topics: Budesonide; Child; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Atresia; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Infant; Treatment Outcome

The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of budesonide oral suspension (BOS) was evaluated during a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study in pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) (MPI 101-01/NCT00762073). Non-compartmental methods were used to calculate PK parameters in 37 patients after receiving morning doses of BOS, with volume and dose adjusted for age (low dose: 0.35 or 0.5 mg; high dose: 1.4 or 2.0 mg [2-9 or 10-18 years old, respectively]). Relationships between apparent oral clearance and volume of distribution, and bodyweight and body mass index were also evaluated. Budesonide systemic exposure increased with BOS dose. After oral administration, time to maximum plasma budesonide concentration occurred ~1 hour post dose and the half-life of budesonide was 3.3-3.5 hours. PK parameters were similar between age groups for low- and high-dose BOS, indicating that volume and dose adjustments for age were appropriate for pediatric patients with EoE. BOS was well tolerated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Budesonide; Child; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Suspensions; Treatment Outcome

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease for which there is currently no pharmacologic therapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, patients 11-55 years of age with EoE and dysphagia were randomized 2:1 to receive budesonide oral suspension (BOS) 2.0 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks at academic or community care practices. Co-primary endpoints were the proportion of stringent histologic responders (≤6 eosinophils/high-power field) or dysphagia symptom responders (≥30% reduction in Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire [DSQ] score) over 12 weeks. Changes in DSQ score (key secondary endpoint) and EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) (secondary endpoint) from baseline to week 12, and safety parameters were examined.. Overall, 318 patients (BOS, n = 213; placebo, n = 105) were randomized and received ≥1 dose of study treatment. More BOS-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved a stringent histologic response (53.1% vs 1.0%; Δ52% [95% confidence interval (CI), 43.3%-59.1%]; P < .001) or symptom response (52.6% vs 39.1%; Δ13% [95% CI, 1.6%-24.3%]; P = .024) over 12 weeks. BOS-treated patients also had greater improvements in least-squares mean DSQ scores and EREFS over 12 weeks than placebo-treated patients: DSQ, -13.0 (SEM 1.2) vs -9.1 (SEM 1.5) (Δ-3.9 [95% CI, -7.1 to -0.8]; P = .015); EREFS, -4.0 (SEM 0.3) vs -2.2 (SEM 0.4) (Δ-1.8 [95% CI, -2.6 to -1.1]; P < .001). BOS was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.. In patients with EoE, BOS 2.0 mg twice daily was superior to placebo in improving histologic, symptomatic, and endoscopic outcomes over 12 weeks. BOS 2.0 mg twice daily was well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02605837.

Topics: Budesonide; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Treatment Outcome

We evaluated treatment withdrawal, long-term outcomes, and safety of budesonide oral suspension (BOS) 2.0 mg twice daily in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis who completed a 12-week induction study.. Induction full responders (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field [eos/hpf] and ≥30% reduction in the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire score) to BOS 2.0 mg twice daily (ORBIT1/SHP621-301/NCT02605837) were randomized to continue BOS (BOS-BOS) or withdraw to placebo (BOS-PBO) for 36 weeks (ORBIT2/SHP621-302/NCT02736409). Induction partial responders and nonresponders, and patients who received induction placebo, received BOS for 36 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of BOS-BOS and BOS-PBO patients who relapsed (≥15 eos/hpf and ≥4 days of dysphagia [Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire] over 2 weeks) by week 36. The key secondary end point was the proportion of induction partial responders and nonresponders who fully responded after 52 weeks of total BOS therapy. Other secondary end points included the proportion of induction full responders with histologic responses (≤1, ≤6, <15 eos/hpf) at week 12 of the extension study, and safety outcomes.. The randomized withdrawal period enrolled 48 patients (BOS-BOS, n = 25; BOS-PBO, n = 23); 106 induction partial responders and nonresponders, and 65 induction placebo patients received BOS. More BOS-PBO than BOS-BOS patients relapsed over 36 weeks (43.5% vs 24.0%; P = .131) and had histologic responses at week 12 of therapy (P < .001). Overall, 13.2% of induction partial responders and nonresponders fully responded at week 36. BOS was well tolerated; therapy duration was not associated with new safety concerns.. For induction full responders, continuing BOS numerically improved maintenance of efficacy vs withdrawal. A longer therapy duration did not raise safety concerns. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02736409.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Deglutition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Enteritis; Eosinophilia; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Gastritis; Humans; Suspensions; Treatment Outcome

Quantification of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) symptoms is crucial for assessing treatment outcomes. We aimed to explore the effect of budesonide oral suspension (BOS) on dysphagia and pain with swallowing.. We performed a secondary analysis of data from a phase 2 multicenter, double-blind, trial (conducted from July 2012 through October 2014) of patients with EoE, 11-40 y old, who were randomly assigned to groups given placebo or BOS (2.0 mg twice daily) for 12 weeks. Symptoms were quantified using the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) from baseline to week 12 of therapy.. Overall, 93 patients were randomly assigned to groups; the prespecified modified intention-to-treat analysis set comprised 87 patients (38 from the placebo group and 49 from the BOS group). Improvements from baseline in least-squares mean (standard error) DSQ (Q2+Q3) scores were observed. The difference between groups was statistically significant only at week 12 (placebo vs BOS: week 4, -4.9 [1.7] vs -7.4 [1.5]; P = .265; week 8, -7.4 [2.1] vs -10.3 [1.8]; P = .288; week 12, -7.5 [1.9] vs -14.3 [1.7]; P = .01). Similar findings were observed for pain (Q4) scores (placebo vs BOS: week 4, -2.5 [0.8] vs -3.3 [0.7]; P = .484; week 8, -3.0 [0.8] vs -4.9 [0.7]; P = .066; week 12, -3.1 [0.8] vs -4.9 [0.7]; P = .109). More severe DSQ and DSQ+pain scores were associated with presence of other symptoms (such as regurgitation) and physician-rated severity. Improvements in DSQ and DSQ+pain scores were greater in patients with either a histologic or endoscopic response than in patients without a response.. In a secondary analysis of data from a phase 2 trial of patients with EoE, we found evidence for improvements in dysphagia and pain scores in patients who received BOS (2.0 mg twice daily) vs placebo. Pain with swallowing should be considered in the clinical assessment of patients with EoE. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01642212.

Topics: Budesonide; Deglutition; Deglutition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Humans; Pain; Treatment Outcome

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disorder. Swallowed topical-acting corticosteroids are effective in bringing active EoE into remission. However, it is not clear whether these drugs are effective for long-term maintenance of remission.. We performed a double-blind trial to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 dosages of a budesonide orodispersible tablet (BOT) vs placebo in maintaining remission of EoE. Maintenance of remission was defined as absence of clinical and histologic relapse and no premature withdrawal for any reason. Two hundred and four adults with EoE in clinical and histologic remission, from 29 European study sites, were randomly assigned to groups given BOT 0.5 mg twice daily (n = 68), BOT 1.0 mg twice daily (n = 68), or placebo twice daily (n = 68) for up to 48 weeks.. At end of treatment, 73.5% of patients receiving BOT 0.5 mg twice daily and 75% receiving BOT 1.0 mg twice daily were in persistent remission compared with 4.4% of patients in the placebo group (P < .001 for both comparisons of BOT with placebo). Median time to relapse in the placebo group was 87 days. The frequency of adverse events was similar in the BOT and placebo groups. Morning serum levels of cortisol were in the normal range at baseline and did not significantly change during treatment. Four patients receiving BOT developed asymptomatic, low serum levels of cortisol. Clinically manifested candidiasis was suspected in 16.2% of patients in the BOT 0.5 mg group and in 11.8% of patients in the BOT 1.0 mg group; all infections resolved with treatment.. In a phase 3 trial, up to 48 weeks of treatment with BOT (0.5 mg or 1.0 mg twice daily) was superior to placebo in maintaining remission of EoE. Both dosages were equally effective and well tolerated. EudraCT number; 2014-001485-99; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02434029.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Budesonide; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Europe; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Remission Induction; Tablets; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Currently, there are no US FDA-approved therapies for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Budesonide oral suspension (BOS; SHP621, TAK-721) is a viscous, muco-adherent, oral formulation of budesonide that is in phase III development for the treatment of EoE. BOS 2 mg twice daily was studied in 12- and 36-week phase III studies for the induction and maintenance of clinical remission in adults and adolescents with EoE (NCT02605837 and NCT02736409). ENTOCORT EC is a gelatin capsule formulation of budesonide that is FDA-approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate active Crohn's disease (CD) in adults and children. This study compared the systemic exposure to budesonide from BOS with that from ENTOCORT EC, aiming to provide the pharmacokinetic (PK) bridge to the safety data of ENTOCORT EC.. Healthy adult volunteers (n = 22) were enrolled in an open-label, single-center, crossover study. Participants received a single oral dose of BOS 2 mg and a single oral dose of ENTOCORT EC 9 mg under fasting conditions in a randomized sequence, with a 48-h washout period between treatments. PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis and compared between treatments using a mixed-effects model with sequence and treatment as fixed effects and individuals within sequence as a random effect.. Plasma budesonide concentrations showed that budesonide was absorbed significantly faster from BOS 2 mg than from ENTOCORT EC 9 mg, with peak concentrations reached at 1.5 and 4 h, respectively (p < 0.001). Systemic exposure to budesonide after a single oral dose of BOS 2 mg was lower than that observed after a single oral dose of ENTOCORT EC 9 mg; the least squares geometric mean maximum plasma concentration and the area under the concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to infinity and from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration of budesonide after BOS 2 mg were 71.1%, 33.5%, and 33.6% of those after ENTOCORT EC 9 mg, respectively. No notable differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed between individuals treated with either drug; all events were mild and none resulted in discontinuation from the study.. This study demonstrated that systemic exposure to budesonide after a single oral dose of BOS 2 mg was lower than that after a single oral dose of ENTOCORT EC 9 mg. These results provide PK bridging data to compare BOS with therapeutic doses of ENTOCORT EC with respect to safety information.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biological Availability; Budesonide; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cross-Over Studies; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Suspensions; Tablets, Enteric-Coated; Young Adult

Budesonide oral suspension (BOS) is a novel topical corticosteroid, which has been shown to improve symptoms and endoscopic appearance, and reduce peak eosinophil counts in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). This trial evaluated the effect of BOS or placebo on the severity (grade) and extent (stage) of 8 histopathologic features observed in EoE, using the validated eosinophilic esophagitis histologic scoring system (EoE HSS). Patients with EoE aged 11 to 40 years with dysphagia were randomized to receive either BOS (2.0 mg twice daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. Mean (SD) EoE HSS grade and stage total scores at baseline for placebo and BOS groups were: grade, 0.42 (0.16) and 0.49 (0.14), respectively; stage: 0.38 (0.14) and 0.46 (0.11), respectively. These scores significantly decreased (improved) from baseline for patients receiving BOS versus placebo (grade: least squares mean change [SE]: placebo vs. BOS, -0.04 [0.03] vs. -0.24 [0.02]; P<0.0001; stage: -0.01 [0.02] vs. -0.19 [0.02]; P<0.0001). EoE HSS total scores improved for 6 of the 8 and 5 of the 8 histopathologic features for grade and stage, respectively, versus placebo. Change in EoE HSS total scores correlated moderately but significantly with change in endoscopic severity (endoscopic reference score; grade: R=0.5349; stage: R=0.5416; both P<0.0001). Change in EoE HSS stage total score correlated weakly with change in Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire scores (grade: R=0.1925; P=0.0740; stage: R=0.2135; P=0.0471). These data demonstrate that the EoE HSS is a valuable endpoint of treatment response in randomized clinical trials and should be considered for future trials for EoE.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Female; Humans; Male; Severity of Illness Index; Suspensions; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of budesonide oral suspension (BOS) maintenance therapy in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).. We performed an open-label extension study of a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with EoE (11-40 years old) who completed double-blind BOS (n = 45) or placebo therapy (n = 37) received 24 weeks' open-label BOS (2.0 mg once daily for 12 weeks, with optional dose increase [1.5-2.0 mg twice daily] for 12 weeks thereafter). Predefined efficacy outcomes included: proportion of patients with a histologic response (≤6 eosinophils/high-power field [eos/hpf]) and change in mean peak eosinophil counts after 24 weeks. Analyses were stratified by patients who received placebo (placebo/BOS) or BOS (BOS/BOS) during the double-blind trial.. BOS was well tolerated and drug-related adverse events were uncommon (placebo/BOS, 19% [7/37]; BOS/BOS, 4% [2/45]). Incidence of oral candidiasis (1 per group) and esophageal candidiasis (placebo/BOS group, n = 4) remained low. Changes in morning serum cortisol levels were not clinically relevant. A histologic response was observed in 49% (16/33) of patients receiving placebo/BOS and 23% (9/39) receiving BOS/BOS. Mean peak eosinophil counts (baseline vs week 24 or early termination) were: placebo/BOS, 118.8 vs 29.1; P < .001 and BOS/BOS, 38.1 vs 72.4; P = .01. Of the patients who responded to double-blind therapy, 42% maintained a histologic response during the open-label extension; 4% of nonresponders gained response.. In an open-label extension study of patients with EoE, BOS was well tolerated and drug-related adverse events were uncommon. BOS maintained a histologic response in some initial responders, but few initial nonresponders had a response. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01642212.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Male; Placebos; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease characterized by ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf) and esophageal dysfunction.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Budesonide; Child; Deglutition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Leukocyte Count; Leukotriene Antagonists; Male; Placebo Effect; Placebos; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Single-Blind Method; Suspensions; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

A new prepared oral viscous budesonide (PVB) has been effective in inducing clinical and histological remission in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).. To evaluate the efficacy of a 12-week maintenance therapy on clinical, endoscopic, and histological remission using half of the dose used in the induction therapy.. We prospectively enrolled pediatric patients with active EoE. After 12 weeks of induction therapy with PVB (< 150 cm: 2 mg/day; ≥ 150 cm: 4 mg/day) patients received a maintenance dose of half of the dose used in the induction therapy (1 mg or 2 mg) for another 12 weeks. A 12-week follow-up was then performed in all patients after the end of therapy. Endoscopy was performed at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 36. Symptoms, endoscopy, and histology scores were also calculated. Serum cortisol was evaluated during the treatment period.. We enrolled 20 children (15 males; median age 10 years; range 4-17). After the 12-week induction therapy 18 patients (90%) were in remission, with a significant decrease in the median peak of eosinophil count/HPF as well as a marked reduction in clinical, endoscopic, and histological scores (p < 0.01). At the end of the maintenance therapy (week 24), 17 patients (85%) were still in remission, while there were only 9 at week 36 (45%). No significant changes in cortisol levels were observed during the study period.. The 12-week maintenance treatment with the half the dose of PVB was effective in sustaining remission at week 24; however, no reduction in the rate of relapse after suspension of treatment occurred.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Age of Onset; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Compounding; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Male; Pharmaceutical Solutions; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Remission Induction; Rome; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viscosity

Topical steroid treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) include swallowed fluticasone from a multi-dose inhaler (MDI) or oral viscous budesonide (OVB) slurry, but the 2 have never been compared. We assessed whether OVB was more effective than MDI for initial treatment of patients with EoE.. In a double-blind, double-dummy trial, patients with a new diagnosis of EoE were randomly assigned to groups given 8 weeks of either OVB (1 mg/4 mL) twice daily plus a placebo inhaler (n = 56) or fluticasone MDI (880 μg) twice daily plus a placebo slurry (n = 55). Primary outcomes were post-treatment maximum eosinophil counts per high-power field (eos/hpf) and a validated dysphagia score (dysphagia symptom questionnaire [DSQ]) at week 8. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic severity (validated EoE endoscopic reference score), histologic response (<15 eos/hpf), and safety.. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, the subjects had baseline peak eosinophil counts of 73 and 77 eos/hpf in the OVB and MDI groups, respectively, and DSQ scores of 11 and 8. Post-treatment eosinophil counts were 15 and 21 in the OVB and MDI groups, respectively (P = .31), with 71% and 64% achieving histologic response (P = .38). DSQ scores were 5 and 4 in the OVB and MDI groups (P = .70). Similar trends were noted for post-treatment total EoE endoscopic reference scores (2 vs 3; P = .06). Esophageal candidiasis developed in 12% of patients receiving OVB and 16% receiving MDI; oral thrush was observed in 3% and 2%, respectively.. In a randomized clinical trial, initial treatment of EoE with either OVB or fluticasone MDI produced a significant decrease in esophageal eosinophil counts and improved dysphagia and endoscopic features. However, OVB was not superior to MDI, so either is an acceptable treatment for EoE. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02019758.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Female; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Metered Dose Inhalers; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Ring; Young Adult

Swallowed topical-acting corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Asthma medications not optimized for esophageal delivery are sometimes effective, although given off-label. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of a budesonide orodispersible tablet (BOT), which allows the drug to be delivered to the esophagus in adults with active EoE.. We performed a double-blind, parallel study of 88 adults with active EoE in Europe. Patients were randomly assigned to groups that received BOT (1 mg twice daily; n = 59) or placebo (n = 29) for 6 weeks. The primary end point was complete remission, based on clinical and histologic factors, including dysphagia and odynophagia severity ≤2 on a scale of 0-10 on each of the 7 days before the end of the double-blind phase and a peak eosinophil count <5 eosinophils/high power field. Patients who did not achieve complete remission at the end of the 6-week double-blind phase were offered 6 weeks of open-label treatment with BOT (1 mg twice daily).. At 6 weeks, 58% of patients given BOT were in complete remission compared with no patients given placebo (P < .0001). The secondary end point of histologic remission was achieved by 93% of patients given BOT vs no patients given placebo (P < .0001). After 12 weeks, 85% of patients had achieved remission. Six-week and 12-week BOT administration were safe and well tolerated; 5% of patients who received BOT developed symptomatic, mild candida, which was easily treated with an oral antifungal agent.. In a randomized trial of adults with active EoE, we found that budesonide oral tablets were significantly more effective than placebo in inducing clinical and histologic remission. Eudra-CT number 2014-001485-99; ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02434029.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antifungal Agents; Budesonide; Candidiasis, Oral; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Tablets; Treatment Outcome

Non-dysphagia symptoms, such as heartburn and dyspepsia, are poorly characterized in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). It is unclear if treatment improves these symptoms. The aim of this paper was to assess (i) heartburn and dyspepsia symptom severity in adult EoE patients using validated symptom measures; (ii) change in symptoms after treatment; and (iii) symptom association with endoscopic and histologic features. In a prospective cohort of adult EoE patients who were not responsive to proton pump inhibitor therapy, non-dysphagia symptoms were assessed with heartburn items from the validated GERD-HRQL (gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life) and SODA (severity of dyspepsia assessment) instruments. Subjects completed the questionnaires at baseline and after treatment. Association of baseline symptoms with endoscopic and histologic features, and before and after treatment with diet or topical steroids, was assessed. Eighty-six EoE patients (mean age 39 years, 57% male, 95% white) completed a baseline questionnaire and 62 completed the follow-up questionnaire. The mean baseline GERD-HRQL score was 4.5 ± 6.5 and the mean total SODA score was 41.0 ± 12.6. At baseline, there was a weak but significant correlation between peak eosinophils and the SODA score (r = 0.28; p = 0.03) and no association between heartburn and SODA scores and endoscopic or other histologic findings. After treatment, there was a decrease in GERD-HRQL heartburn (4.3 vs. 2.6; p = 0.04) and SODA (49.5 vs. 35.5; p = 0.04) scores in histologic responders, but not in nonresponders. In a prospective cohort of EoE patients, baseline eosinophils positively correlated with dyspepsia severity. Heartburn and dyspepsia symptoms improved after treatment in histologic responders.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Combined Modality Therapy; Diet Therapy; Dyspepsia; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Female; Fluticasone; Follow-Up Studies; Heartburn; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Oral viscous budesonide is a recent therapeutic option for eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) compared with dietary restriction and inhaled steroids. This single-centre, open-label, not blinded study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new, preprepared oral viscous budesonide suspension (PVB) in children and adolescents with EoE.. We treated 36 children with PVB (29 boys; median age 12 years) with EoE diagnosed according to European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition guidelines. Patients <150 and >150 cm height received 2 and 4 mg PVB daily, respectively, for 12 weeks. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed at baseline, after 12 weeks of therapy and 24 weeks after the end of therapy. Baseline and post-treatment scores were calculated for symptoms, endoscopy, and histology. Serum cortisol was performed at baseline, 12, and 36 weeks.. At the end of PVB trial, endoscopy showed macroscopic remission in 32 patients (88.9%), whereas at histology median pre- and post-treatment peak eosinophil count/high power field (HPF) markedly decreased from 42.2 (range: 15-100) to 2.9 (range: 0-30); moreover, mean symptom and histology scores impressively improved compared with baseline (P < 0.01). At 24 weeks after the end of PVB therapy, endoscopy showed oesophageal relapse in 21 patients (58.3%), whereas 15 (41.7%) were still in remission. Seven children (19.4%) with positive multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH were treated also with proton pump inhibitors. No significant difference between pre-/post-treatment morning cortisol levels occurred.. The new PVB suspension presented in the present study is effective and safe for treating children with proven EoE. Larger placebo-controlled clinical trials would provide more information about dosing, efficacy, and long-term safety of this formulation, specifically designed for the oesophagus.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Suspensions; Treatment Outcome

Pharmacologic treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is limited to off-label use of corticosteroids not optimized for esophageal delivery. We performed a randomized, controlled phase 2 trial to assess the ability of budesonide oral suspension (BOS), a novel muco-adherent topical steroid formulation, to reduce symptoms and esophageal eosinophilia in adolescents and adults with EoE.. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial, 93 EoE patients between the ages of 11 and 40 years with dysphagia and active esophageal eosinophilia were randomized to receive either BOS 2 mg or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. Co-primary outcomes were change in Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) score from baseline, and proportion of patients with a histologic response (≤6 eosinophils/high-power field) after treatment. Endoscopic severity scores and safety parameters were assessed.. At baseline, mean DSQ scores were 29.3 and 29.0, and mean peak eosinophil counts were 156 and 130 per hpf in the BOS and placebo groups, respectively. After treatment, DSQ scores were 15.0 and 21.5, and mean peak eosinophil counts were 39 and 113 per high-power field, respectively (P < .05 for all). For BOS vs placebo, change in DSQ score was -14.3 vs -7.5 (P = .0096), histologic response rates were 39% vs 3% (P < .0001), and change in endoscopic severity score was -3.8 vs 0.4 (P < .0001). Adverse events were similar between groups.. Treatment with BOS was well tolerated in adolescent and young adult patients with EoE and resulted in improvement in symptomatic, endoscopic, and histologic parameters using validated outcome instruments. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01642212.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Cell Count; Child; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Esophagoscopy; Female; Humans; Male; Severity of Illness Index; Suspensions; Young Adult

To investigate the efficacy and safety of two different budesonide formulations (effervescent tablet for orodispersible use (BET) and viscous suspension (BVS)) with different daily dosages for short-term treatment of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE).. Adults with active EoE (n=76) randomly received 14 days' treatment with either BET 2×1 mg/day (BET1, n=19) or BET 2×2 mg/day (BET2, n=19), or BVS 2×5 mL (0.4 mg/mL)/day (BVS, n=19) or placebo (n=19) in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion, with a 2-week follow-up. Primary end point was histological remission (mean of <16 eosinophils/mm(2 )hpf). Secondary end points included endoscopy score, dysphagia score, drug safety and patient's preference for drug formulation.. Histological remission occurred in 100%, 94.7% and 94.7% of budesonide (BET1, BET2, BVS, respectively) and in 0% of placebo recipients (p<0.0001). The improvement in total endoscopic intensity score was significantly higher in the three budesonide groups compared with placebo. Dysphagia improved in all groups at the end of treatment; however, improvement of dysphagia persisted only in those treated with BET1 (p=0.0196 vs placebo). There were no serious adverse events. Local fungal infection (stained fungi) occurred in two patients of each budesonide group (10.5%). The effervescent tablet was preferred by 80% of patients.. BET or BVS was highly effective and safe for short-term treatment of EoE. The 1 mg (twice daily) dosage was equally effective as the 2 mg twice daily dosage. The majority of patients preferred the effervescent tablet formulation.. NCT02280616; EudraCT number, 2009-016692-29.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Remission Induction; Suspensions; Tablets; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To establish the prevalence of adrenal insufficiency (AI) in children with eosinophilic esophagitis treated with swallowed fluticasone propionate (FP) or budesonide.. Children treated with FP or budesonide for ≥ 6 months underwent a low-dose adrenocorticotropin stimulation test. Patients using systemic, inhaled, intranasal, or topical glucocorticoids were excluded. The primary outcome is AI, defined as peak serum cortisol <18 μg/dL (≤ 495 nmol/L).. Of 58 patients (81% male), 67% were on FP (median age 13.7 years [range 4.3-19.1], dose 1320 μg/d [440-1760], treatment duration 4.0 years [0.6-13.5]). Thirty-three percent were on budesonide (median age 10.7 years [range 3.2-17.2], dose 1000 μg/d [500-2000], treatment duration 3.4 years [0.6-7.7]). The overall prevalence of abnormal peak cortisol response (≤ 20 μg/dL) was 15% (95% CI 6%-25%) (indeterminate [18-20 μg/dL] 5% [n = 3] vs AI [<18 μg/dL] 10% [n = 6]). All patients on budesonide had a normal response vs only 77% of patients on FP (P = .02), all of whom were taking FP at a dose >440 μg/d.. AI was present in 10% of children treated with swallowed glucocorticoids for ≥ 6 months and was found only in those treated with FP >440 μg/d. We recommend low-dose adrenocorticotropin stimulation testing in children treated long term with high dose FP to allow early detection of AI.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adrenal Insufficiency; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Fluticasone; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Elimination diets and high-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are advocated as first-line treatments in patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE).. To record the treatment outcome for patients with EoE prospectively managed according to a clinical algorithm.. Patients with oesophageal eosinophilia commenced esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. Those in histological remission were re-classified as PPI-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia. Nonresponders were offered the 6-food elimination diet with a PPI, or topical budesonide monotherapy (1 mg orally twice daily as an aqueous gel). Once disease control was achieved remission was reassessed at 3 months (all modalities) and an additional 6 months (diet group).. Of 107 patients who completed 8 weeks of PPI, 25 (23%) were PPI-responsive. 56 of 81 (69%) of patients with EoE chose the elimination diet with PPI. 29 (52%) had complete remission, 23 completed dietary reintroduction and food triggers were identified in 20 (36%). 25 chose budesonide with 23/25 (92%) responding. Remission was sustained in >85% of patients at 3 months with all treatment modalities. At 9 months, only 10/18 (55%) of patients who responded to the elimination diet with PPI remained complaint and sustained remission.. Many patients previously diagnosed with EoE will respond to PPI. Initial response >50% is possible with the elimination diet plus PPI, but many will fail to undergo food reintroduction, or will cease the diet and relapse, resulting in only one in four patient sustaining remission at 9 months. Budesonide is very effective short term, but longer term study is needed.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Combined Modality Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esomeprazole; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Recurrence; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome

No treatment has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We investigated the efficacy and safety of a new formulation of oral budesonide suspension (OBS), a corticosteroid, in a prospective, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study.. Subjects 2-18 years old with symptoms of EoE and peak eosinophil counts ≥20/high-power field at ≥2 levels of the esophagus were randomly assigned to groups given placebo or low-dose, medium-dose, or high-dose OBS for 12 weeks. Doses and volumes were adjusted on the basis of patients' age to cover the entire esophagus. The primary efficacy end point was compound response to therapy (peak eosinophil counts ≤6/high-power field at all levels of the esophagus and ≥50% reduction in EoE symptom score). Multiple safety parameters were evaluated.. Data from 71 subjects who completed all efficacy assessments were included in the primary efficacy analysis. At the end of 12 weeks, there were significantly greater percentages of responders in groups given medium-dose OBS (52.6%, P = .0092) and high-dose OBS (47.1%, P = .0174) than in the group given placebo (5.6%); there was no significant difference in percentages of responders between the low-dose OBS (11.8%) and placebo groups (P = .5282). The significant compound responses noted in the medium-dose and high-dose OBS groups were accounted for by the significant histologic responses; in contrast, all 4 groups (including the placebo group) had large symptom responses, and there was no significant difference in the percentage of subjects with a symptom response in either OBS group compared with the placebo group (P ≥ .1235). There were no unexpected safety concerns or signals.. Peak eosinophil counts were significantly reduced throughout the esophagus in pediatric patients with EoE who were given medium-dose and high-dose OBS. There was a large symptom response to placebo that was similar to symptom responses in the OBS groups; symptom response did not distinguish OBS from placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00762073.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Esophagus; Female; Histocytochemistry; Humans; Leukocyte Count; Male; Suspensions; Treatment Outcome; United States

Monitoring of the treatment response in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) requires structured endoscopical and histological examination of the oesophagus. Less invasive methods would be highly desirable.. To evaluate the utility of several EoE-associated blood and serum markers in order to non-invasively monitor the response to treatment with swallowed topical corticosteroids in adult EoE patients.. In a randomised, controlled double-blind trial blood samples of EoE patients (n = 69) were collected at baseline and after 14 days of treatment with budesonide (n = 51) or placebo (n = 18) respectively. Absolute blood eosinophil count (AEC) as well as serum levels of CCL-17, CCL-18, CCL-26, eosinophil-cationic-protein (ECP) and mast cell tryptase (MCT) were determined and correlated with oesophageal eosinophil density and with symptom and endoscopy scores.. Histological remission, defined as mean number of <16 eos/mm(2) hpf at end-of-treatment, was achieved in 98% of the budesonide and 0% of the placebo recipients. AEC [380.2 vs. 214.7/mm(3) (P = 0.0001)], serum-CCL-17 [294.3 vs. 257.9 pg/mL (P = 0.0019)], -CCL-26 [26.7 vs. 16.2 pg/mL (P = 0.0058)], -ECP [45.5 ± 44.7 vs. 27.5 ± 25.0 μg/L (P = 0.0016)] and -MCT [5.3 ± 2.9 vs. 4.5 ± 2.6 μg/L (P = 0.0019)] significantly decreased under budesonide but not under placebo. AEC significantly correlated with oesophageal eosinophil density before (r = 0.28, P = 0.0236) and after (r = 0.42, P = 0.0004) budesonide treatment. In ROC-AUC analyses post-treatment values of AEC were significantly associated with histological remission (ROC-AUC 0.754; 95% CI: 0.617-0.891; P = 0.0003).. The budesonide-induced treatment response in EoE is mirrored by several blood and serum markers, and the absolute blood eosinophil count is the most valuable as it shows correlation with the oesophageal eosinophil density.

Topics: Adult; Biomarkers; Budesonide; Chemokines, CC; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Eosinophil Cationic Protein; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Leukocyte Count; Male; Middle Aged; Remission Induction; ROC Curve; Tryptases

Topically administered glucocorticoids such as budesonide have the potential of being established as first-line medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Safety of budesonide is based on high elimination by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) enzymes. We aimed to investigate systemic absorption and elimination of a new budesonide formulation in patients with active EoE in comparison with healthy controls.. After single and multiple doses of orodispersible budesonide (4 mg/day) the parent drug, its CYP3A-dependent metabolites, and endogenous cortisol were determined in 12 adult patients with active EoE and 12 healthy controls. An approved ileal-release formulation of budesonide was taken for reference. Molar ratios of metabolite formation in plasma were used as indices of CYP3A metabolic function.. CYP3A-dependent metabolite formation was significantly reduced in patients with active EoE as compared to healthy controls. Impaired biotransformation was reflected by a significantly higher extent of budesonide absorption and elongated elimination half-life in EoE patients. Comparison of morning serum cortisol levels at baseline with those after 1 week of treatment with budesonide revealed a significant decrease in EoE patients but not in healthy subjects.. Active EoE is associated with reduced elimination of budesonide via CYP3A, the major subfamily of drug-metabolizing enzymes in humans.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biotransformation; Budesonide; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Male; Middle Aged

The consensus statements for eosinophilic oesophagitis recommend that ambulatory pH monitoring is one means of determining if gastro-oesophageal reflux is the cause of oesophageal eosinophilia and should guide pharmacological therapy.. To evaluate prospectively the accuracy of pH monitoring as a predictor of endoscopic, histological and symptomatic response in patients with oesophageal eosinophilia.. We conducted a prospective trial in which patients with oesophageal eosinophilic infiltration with ≥15 eos/hpf underwent a 24-h pH study and were placed in one of two treatment arms for 6 weeks based on positive or negative results. Patients with abnormal acid exposure were treated with esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily and others were treated with oral viscous budesonide 1 g twice daily. Response to treatment was assessed by oesophageal histology (<5 eos/hpf) and symptoms.. A total of 51 patients were enrolled in the study. The average patient age was 39 years and 31 patients (61%) were male. The average number of eosinophils per hpf, prior to study enrolment was 41.2 (range 15-140, s.d. 27.7). Nineteen (37%) had positive pH studies and 32 (63%) had negative pH studies. Eighteen patients completed treatment with esomeprazole. Only eleven (61%) had histological response and, of these eleven, five (46%) had symptomatic improvement. A total of 28 patients with normal acid exposure completed treatment with budesonide. Only 16 (57%) had histological and 11 (69%) had symptomatic improvement.. In this prospective trial of pH-guided treatment, neither positive nor negative results of initial pH monitoring accurately predicted response to therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esomeprazole; Female; Gastric Acidity Determination; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

We performed a randomized trial to compare nebulized and viscous topical corticosteroid treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Subjects with incident EoE (n = 25) received budesonide 1 mg twice daily, either nebulized and then swallowed (NEB) or as an oral viscous slurry (OVB), for 8 weeks. Baseline eosinophil counts for the NEB and OVB groups were 101 and 83 (P = .62). Posttreatment counts were 89 and 11 (P = .02). The mucosal medication contact time, measured by scintigraphy, was higher for the OVB group than the NEB group (P < .005) and was inversely correlated with eosinophil count (R = -0.67; P = .001). OVB was more effective than NEB in reducing numbers of esophageal eosinophils in patients with EoE. OVB provided a significantly higher level of esophageal exposure to the therapeutic agent, which correlated with lower eosinophil counts.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adult; Biomarkers; Budesonide; Drug Administration Schedule; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Esophagus; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Leukocyte Count; Male; Oral Sprays; Prospective Studies; Radionuclide Imaging; Treatment Outcome

Topical corticosteroids are effective in inducing clinical and histologic remission in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, the best long-term management strategy for this chronic inflammatory disease has not been determined.. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 50-week trial, we evaluated in 28 patients the efficacy of twice-daily swallowed budesonide (0.25 mg each) to maintain quiescent EoE in remission. Pretreatment and posttreatment activity was assessed clinically, endoscopically, histologically, immunohistologically, and by endosonography. The primary end point was the therapy's ability to maintain EoE in histologic remission. Secondary end points were efficacy in symptom control, prevention of tissue remodeling, and safety.. In patients given low-dose budesonide, the load of esophageal eosinophils increased from 0.4 to 31.8 eosinophils/high-power field (P = .017). In patients given placebo, the load increased from 0.7 to 65.0 eosinophils/high-power field (P = .0001); this increase was significantly greater than in patients given budesonide (P = .024). The symptom scores developed in a similar manner in the 2 groups. Budesonide, but not placebo, reduced noneosinophilic markers of inflammation, epithelial cell apoptosis, and remodeling events. Compared with control individuals, patients had significantly thickened esophageal walls, based on endosonography (3.05 vs 2.18 mm; P < .0001). Budesonide therapy was associated with a significant reduction in mucosal thickness (0.75-0.45 mm; P = .025), but epithelial thickness remained stable (261.22 vs 277.23 μm; P = .576). No serious adverse events occurred.. Low-dose budesonide is more effective than placebo in maintaining EoE in histologic and clinical remission. Signs of esophageal remodeling showed a trend toward normalization. Long-term administration of topical corticosteroids was well tolerated without induction of epithelial atrophy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagus; Female; Histocytochemistry; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Secondary Prevention; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the impact of type and dose of swallowed topical steroids (STS) and concurrent steroid therapy on the development and resolution of adrenal insufficiency (AI) in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).. We performed a retrospective case-control study of pediatric EoE subjects in a single tertiary care center, who were treated with STS for at least 3 months and diagnosed with AI based on a peak stimulated cortisol level of <18 µg/dL (500 nmol/L). Steroid forms and doses, and endoscopy data were collected at the time of AI diagnosis and AI resolution or the last known evaluation. Steroid formulations were converted to a fluticasone-equivalent dose for analysis.. Thirty-two EoE subjects with AI were identified, and 20 had AI resolution, including 12 who remained on lower dose STS. Eight of the 32 patients were also treated with extended-release budesonide (ER budesonide), which resulted in a 7-fold higher total daily steroid dose, and thus were analyzed separately. When the 24 cases that were not on ER budesonide were compared to the 81 controls, no difference was found in the STS dose nor total daily steroid dose, although the inhaled steroid dose had marginal significance. Peak eosinophil counts tended to increase when STS doses were decreased, except in subjects on ER budesonide at AI diagnosis.. Altering the total daily steroid regimen can lead to resolution of AI in patients with EoE, though this may come at the expense of disease control.

Topics: Adrenal Insufficiency; Budesonide; Case-Control Studies; Child; Drug Tapering; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Steroids

In recent years significant progress has been made in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), especially in the area of topical corticosteroids. Novel EoE-specific formulations have been developed and first approvals have been obtained for induction and maintenance of remission in adult EoE patients with the orodispersible budesonide tablet in Germany and other European and non-EU countries. A novel budesonide oral suspension is currently under priority review by the FDA for first approval in the U.S. In contrast, the scientific evidence on the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors remains limited. Moreover, new biologicals have been identified which showed promising results in phase 2 trials and are now being studied in phase 3. This article aims to summarize and discuss recent advances and perspectives in the treatment of EoE.. In jüngster Zeit wurden in der Therapie der eosinophilen Ösophagitis (EoE) und insbesondere im Bereich der topischen Corticosteroide erhebliche Fortschritte erreicht. Neue EoE-spezifische Darreichungsformen wurden entwickelt und haben in Form der orodispersiblen Budesonid-Tablette zu der ersten in Deutschland und anderen europäischen und außereuropäischen Ländern zugelassenen Therapie der EoE bei Erwachsenen geführt. In den USA steht eine EoE-spezifische orale Budesonid-Suspension kurz vor der Zulassung. Dagegen bleibt die wissenschaftliche Datenlage zur Wirksamkeit von Protonenpumpeninhibtoren weiterhin limitiert. Auch im Bereich der Biologika konnten nach langer Zeit Substanzen identifiziert werden, die erstmals in Phase 2 sehr vielversprechende Ergebnisse gezeigt haben und sich derzeit in klinischen Prüfungen der Phase 3 befinden. In diesem Artikel sollen die aktuellen Fortschritte und Perspektiven in der Therapie der EoE dargestellt und diskutiert werden.

Topics: Adult; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Germany; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Given the variety of preparations and lack of standardization of swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC) for treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), we sought to better understand STC prescribing practices of pediatric gastroenterologists. A 12-question survey was distributed to members of North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Special Interest Group and responses were analyzed. Forty-two of 68 physicians responded. Oral viscous budesonide (OVB) was overall first choice STC in 31 (74%) survey respondents, with OVB most frequently utilized in patients under 5 years old and fluticasone propionate in patients 13-18 years old. Nineteen types of mixing vehicles were used for OVB preparation, the 3 most frequent being sucralose, honey, and artificial maple syrup. Insurance coverage, cost, and patient compliance were most frequently cited barriers to STC use. Highly variable STC prescribing practices reported by this group highlights the need for standardization of STC treatment in EoE.

Topics: Adolescent; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated condition characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and an eosinophilic inflammation of the esophagus.

Topics: Budesonide; Child; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Steroids

Paediatric eosinophilic gastritis (EG) is a rare disorder and existing literature on diagnostic criteria and management remains lacking. We aim to describe the clinical spectrum and assess the efficacy of dietary elimination and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, with particular emphasis on histologic remission in children with primary EG.. We performed a retrospective study of patients aged 0-18 years diagnosed with EG at a single centre in Singapore from 2013 to 2021. EG was diagnosed based on histological criteria of infiltration of >30 eosinophils per high-power film (HPF) in >5 separate HPFs from gastric biopsies, in the absence of other causes. First-line treatment consisted of PPI therapy and empiric 1-6 food elimination diet (FED). Outcomes measured were clinical, endoscopic and histological remission (defined as eosinophil count <20/HPF in gastric biopsies).. Twenty-one (66.7% females) patients were included with median age at diagnosis of 15 months (range:3-192). Majority presented with vomiting (76.2%) and gastrointestinal bleeding (71.4%). Twenty patients were initiated on FED+PPI and 16 had post-treatment biopsies. Clinical, endoscopic and histologic remissions were achieved in 94.7%, 81.3% and 68.8% respectively following FED+PPI. Histologic remission was significantly associated with younger age (9 vs. 132 months; P = 0.026). Four patients who did not respond to FED+PPI were started on oral viscous budesonide, of whom one achieved histological remission and two had clinical improvement.. FED+PPI is effective as first-line treatment in achieving histological remission in paediatric EG particularly in younger patients. Topical corticosteroids can be considered for those who have failed FED+PPI therapy.

Topics: Budesonide; Child; Enteritis; Eosinophilia; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Gastritis; Humans; Male; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies

A novel budesonide orodispersible tablet (BOT) has been proven effective in adult patients with active eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) in a 6-week placebo-controlled trial (EOS-1).. To report the efficacy of an open-label induction treatment with BOT in a large prospective cohort of EoE patients within the EOS-2 study.. Among 181 patients enrolled, 126 (69.6%) achieved clinico-histological remission (histological remission 90.1%, clinical remission 75.1%). The mean peak eosinophil counts decreased by 283 eos/mm. In this large prospective trial, a 6-week open-label treatment with BOT 1 mg BID was highly effective and safe in achieving clinico-histological remission of active EoE and confirmed the results of the placebo-controlled EOS-1 trial.

Topics: Adult; Budesonide; Deglutition Disorders; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Prospective Studies; Remission Induction; Tablets

Topical steroids are commonly used in treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but currently there is lack of data to clarify most effective regimen. We aimed to study the achievement of histologic remission using the same dose of budesonide in two different delivery formulations. Patients with established EoE treated with pharmacy compounded budesonide capsule or budesonide Rincinol gel (both 3 mg twice daily) were studied retrospectively. Those with pre-treatment and post-treatment histologic assessment were included with main endpoint being histologic remission. 103 patients (62 gel, 41 capsule) were included, with higher rate of histologic remission with gel (84 vs. 59%, P=0.004). A subset of patients in both groups had lack of steroid response (<50% drop in eosinophils) (15% for gel, 32% for capsule). Formulation/delivery vehicle of steroid treatments to esophageal mucosa in EoE appears important for treatment efficacy, with budesonide gel having higher likelihood of histologic remission compared to budesonide capsules in our population. A truly steroid refractory group appears likely in our population. Larger, prospective studies may help clarify best regimen of topical steroids in EoE and may work to identify patients likely to benefit from alternative therapies.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Steroids; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Budesonide; Enteritis; Eosinophilia; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Gastritis; Humans; Suspensions; Treatment Outcome

Budesonide orodispersible tablets (BOT) have been approved in Europe and Canada for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), a rare and chronic disease. The objective of this study was to assess the economic impact of BOT on both the induction and maintenance of clinico-pathological remission of EoE by performing a cost-utility analysis (CUA).. For both the induction and maintenance settings, BOT was compared to no treatment in a target population of adult patients with EoE non-responsive to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. Markov models were developed for the induction and maintenance settings over 52-week and life-time horizons, respectively. Analyses were performed from both a Canadian Ministry of Health (MoH) and societal perspective. The resulting incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were compared to a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 Canadian dollars/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the base-case results.. In the base-case probabilistic analysis, BOT compared to no treatment resulted in an ICUR of $1073/QALY and $30,555/QALY from a MoH perspective in the induction and maintenance settings, respectively. BOT was a cost-effective option for both induction and maintenance in > 99% of Monte Carlo simulations. In the scenario analyses, the deterministic ICUR of BOT compared to no treatment varied from $682/QALY to $8510/QALY in the induction setting and $21,005/QALY to $55,157/QALY in the maintenance setting.. BOT was cost-effective compared to no treatment for both the induction and maintenance of clinico-pathological remission of EoE in patients non-responsive to PPIs.

Topics: Adult; Budesonide; Canada; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Tablets

To describe the clinical and laboratory profile, natural course, treatment outcome, and risk factors of posttransplant esophageal and nonesophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs).. All children (aged <18 years) who underwent liver transplantation, between 2011 and 2019, in a single transplant center with a follow-up period of 1 year or more posttransplant and with a history of posttransplant endoscopic evaluation were included in this study.. During the study period, 89 children met the inclusion criteria. Patients were followed for a median of 8.0 years. A total of 39 (44%) patients were diagnosed with EGID after transplantation. Of these, 29 (33%) had eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and 10 (11%) had eosinophilic gastritis, gastroenteritis or enterocolitis. In comparison with the non-EGID group, patients with EGID were younger at transplant (P ≤ 0.0001), transplanted more frequently due to biliary atresia (P ≤ 0.0001), and had higher rates of pretransplant allergy (P = 0.019). In the posttransplant period, they had higher rates of mammalian Target of Rapamycin inhibitor use (P = 0.006), Epstein-Barr virus viremia (P = 0.03), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (P = 0.005), and allergen sensitization (P ≤ 0.0001). In regression analysis, young age at transplant, age at diagnosis, pretransplant atopic dermatitis, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease were associated with an increased risk of EGID or EoE. Laboratory abnormalities such as anemia (P = 0.007), thrombocytosis (P = 0.012), and hypoalbuminemia (P = 0.031) were more commonly observed in the eosinophilic gastritis, gastroenteritis or enterocolitis group than in the EoE group. Following treatment, most patients had symptomatic resolution at 3 months and histologic resolution at 6 months postdiagnosis. Among the patients who had 5 years of follow-up, none recurred.. EGID is a common posttransplant diagnosis, which seems to affect patients who are transplanted earlier and who have pretransplant atopy. Posttransplant EGID is responsive to treatment, but as histologic remission occurs after symptomatic resolution, the decision to perform control endoscopy should be delayed.

Topics: Age Factors; Anti-Allergic Agents; Biliary Atresia; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Cholestasis, Intrahepatic; Dermatitis, Atopic; Disease Progression; Drug Tapering; Enteritis; Enterocolitis; Eosinophilia; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastritis; Glucocorticoids; Graft Rejection; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Immunosuppressive Agents; Infant; Ketotifen; Liver Failure, Acute; Liver Transplantation; Lymphoproliferative Disorders; Male; Postoperative Complications; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Tacrolimus; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Treatment Outcome; Viremia

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory oesophageal disease, which has become more recognised in the past decade. We wanted to characterise our patients and review their course of disease and response to treatment.. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of EoE patients from January 2010 to May 2018 in our Gastroenterology Institute. A hundred and two children were included in this study. We investigated the characteristics of patients and the response to three treatment options: proton pump inhibitors, elimination diet and topical steroids. The response to treatment was analysed according to 3 aspects: clinical, endoscopic appearance and histological features.. Clinical improvement was noted in 55%, 75% and 87.5% on PPIs, diet and budesonide, respectively. Endoscopic improvement was noted in 38.4%, 51.4% and 65.4% on PPIs, diet and budesonide, respectively. Histological improvement was noted in 43.7%, 62.2% and 88.5% on PPIs, diet and budesonide, respectively.. Our findings suggest that Israeli paediatric EoE patients have characteristics that resemble previous reports. Although there is a correlation between symptoms, endoscopic and histological appearance, we cannot rely on patients reports alone, and therefore, repeated endoscopy and biopsies are mandated. Topical steroids seem to be the most effective treatment option.

Topics: Budesonide; Child; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies

Little is known about the use of compounded steroids for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).. We conducted a telephone survey of all compounding pharmacies in Michigan and queried about practices and costs of compounded budesonide for EoE.. Of 68 Michigan pharmacies, 93% responded, and 20 (29%) offer compounded budesonide suspension for EoE. Formulations, dose, and instructions for use varied across pharmacies. The mean cost for a 30-day supply was $74.50.. Although few compounding pharmacies offer budesonide suspension and there are substantial variations in formulations, this may be a significantly more affordable treatment option for many.

Topics: Budesonide; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Compounding; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Michigan; Surveys and Questionnaires

Straumann A, Lucendo AJ, Miehlke S, et al.

Topics: Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Tablets; Treatment Outcome

In recent years significant progress has been made in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), especially in the area of topical corticosteroids. Novel EoE-specific formulations have been developed and first approvals have been obtained for induction and maintenance of remission in adult EoE patients with the orodispersible budesonide tablet in Germany and other European and non-EU countries. A novel budesonide oral suspension is currently under priority review by the FDA for first approval in the U.S. In contrast, the scientific evidence on the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors remains limited. Moreover, new biologicals have been identified which showed promising results in phase 2 trials and are now being studied in phase 3. This article aims to summarize and discuss recent advances and perspectives in the treatment of EoE.. In jüngster Zeit wurden in der Therapie der eosinophilen Ösophagitis (EoE) und insbesondere im Bereich der topischen Corticosteroide erhebliche Fortschritte erreicht. Neue EoE-spezifische Darreichungsformen wurden entwickelt und haben in Form der orodispersiblen Budesonid-Tablette zu der ersten in Deutschland und anderen europäischen und außereuropäischen Ländern zugelassenen Therapie der EoE bei Erwachsenen geführt. In den USA steht eine EoE-spezifische orale Budesonid-Suspension kurz vor der Zulassung. Dagegen bleibt die wissenschaftliche Datenlage zur Wirksamkeit von Protonenpumpeninhibtoren weiterhin limitiert. Auch im Bereich der Biologika konnten nach langer Zeit Substanzen identifiziert werden, die erstmals in Phase 2 sehr vielversprechende Ergebnisse gezeigt haben und sich derzeit in klinischen Prüfungen der Phase 3 befinden. In diesem Artikel sollen die aktuellen Fortschritte und Perspektiven in der Therapie der EoE dargestellt und diskutiert werden.

Topics: Adult; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Germany; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors

Topics: Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Mometasone Furoate; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Alcoholism; Budesonide; Deglutition Disorders; Diverticulum, Esophageal; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagoscopy; Esophagus; Food; Foreign Bodies; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Radiography, Thoracic

Topical steroids are effective in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but patients often show different tendencies to relapse. We assessed whether gene expression is associated with a sort of steroid dependency in EoE children.. Biopsy samples were prospectively collected on EoE children responding to topical steroids. Patients treated with viscous budesonide for 24 weeks were subsequently classified as early (6 months) or late (>6 months) relapsing. RNA was isolated from esophageal biopsies at the time of the relapse and analyzed by NGS for transcriptome profiling.. Of 40 patients, 22 patients were considered for mRNA expression profile. Thirteen were included in the early-relapse group, and 9 were in the late-relapse. No significant difference was observed in the two groups for clinical, endoscopic or histological features. Using the mRNA expression profile we performed supervised clustering using the 10 top differentially expressed genes between early and late relapsing patients. The heatmap and PCA show a proper segregation among patients. SERPINB12 is the only gene attaining a significant differential expression between the two groups (FDR < 0.05).. Different tendencies to relapse in EoE children responding to topical steroids might be related to altered mRNA expressions. SERPINB12 presented a significantly higher expression in the late relapse group and it deserves further investigations.

Topics: Adolescent; Biomarkers; Budesonide; Child; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagus; Female; Gene Expression Profiling; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Male; Pilot Projects; Recurrence; RNA, Messenger; Serpins; Steroids

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a T-helper 2 (Th2), eosinophilic disease associated with pathologic tissue remodeling that leads to end-organ dysfunction. During early-stage disease, inflammation and subepithelial fibrosis are coupled and reversible, but in late-stage or therapy-resistant disease, there can be uncoupling of these features with progressive esophageal rigidity and strictures contributing to clinical dysphagia and food impactions. No current pharmacotherapeutic interventions directly target esophageal fibrosis. Based on the ability of the thiazolidinediones (TZD) to regulate intestinal and hepatic fibrosis, we tested the antifibrotic effects of the TZDs, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, in preclinical studies using primary human esophageal fibroblasts.. Primary fibroblasts isolated from normal or EoE esophagi were treated with transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 in the absence or presence of TZDs and, in some experiments, without or with budesonide and analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR and immunoblotting. Immunohistochemical analysis of human esophageal biopsies was performed.. EoE esophageal biopsies and esophageal fibroblasts expressed higher levels of the TZD receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ), than normal controls. PPAR-γ was inducible by the Th2 cytokine, interleukin 4 (IL-4). TZD significantly reduced TGF-β1-induced myofibroblast and fibrotic gene and protein expression preferentially in EoE, but not normal esophageal fibroblasts. In esophageal fibroblasts, TGF-β1 increased phosphorylated Smad2/3 and p38, but TZDs preferentially inhibited p38 phosphorylation, suggesting signaling pathway-specific effects. The TZDs were more potent than budesonide at decreasing collagen-1α1 expression.. The TZDs preferentially exert antifibrotic effects in TGF-β1-activated EoE fibroblasts and provide a preclinical foundation for further investigation of the potential of the TZDs in EoE pathologic remodeling.

Topics: Biopsy; Budesonide; Cells, Cultured; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagus; Fibrosis; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Interleukin-4; Myofibroblasts; Pioglitazone; PPAR gamma; Primary Cell Culture; Rosiglitazone; Signal Transduction; Transforming Growth Factor beta1

Topics: Budesonide; Causality; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Tablets

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease that has been known since the early 1990s. Swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC) belong to the therapeutic cornerstones. We describe a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to Jorveza®, a newly developed orodispersible budesonide tablet licensed for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis.. A 32-year-old Caucasian woman with EoE was newly treated with Jorveza®. Hours after the first intake, she felt a "strange pruritus" in the throat. This sensation worsened with each subsequent intake. On day 4 she developed oral mucosal symptoms (paresthesia of the tongue, sore and an itchy throat). Intraoral, throat and facial swellings, but no systemic reaction were observed. Patch testing using two commercial test series as well as the orodispersible budesonide tablet revealed a strong sensitization, proving a T cell mediated allergy to budesonide.. Orodispersible budesonide is increasingly prescribed for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. The development of oropharyngeal symptoms after initiating should alert the treating physician to the possibility of a hypersensitivity reaction.

Topics: Adult; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hypersensitivity, Delayed; Tablets

For eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) recently an association with immunoglobulin (Ig)G4 rather than IgE has been reported. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most important differential diagnosis of EoE. We compared esophageal IgG4 plasma cell infiltration and serum IgG4 levels of EoE patients (before and after budesonide therapy) with GERD patients.. Prospectively collected serum samples of 17 EoE patients before and after 8 weeks of therapy with budesonide (1 mg BID) were analyzed for total and antigen-specific IgG4 and IgE levels. Also, immunohistochemical analysis of total and IgG4-positive plasma cells was performed on esophageal biopsies of these patients. In total, 14 GERD patients without histologic proof of eosinophilic infiltration were taken as a control group.. Total IgG4 serum levels in EoE patients were significantly higher than in GERD patients (121.0 vs. 71.2 mg/dL; P=0.038) and decreased under budesonide therapy (121.0 vs. 104.2 mg/dL; P=0.019). IgE levels did not differ significantly between all groups. In EoE patients also a high number of esophageal IgG4-positive plasma cells was detected and significantly reduced under therapy (29.1 vs. 0.1 IgG4-positive cells; P<0.001). In GERD patients no relevant esophageal plasma cell infiltration could be seen.. In EoE patients elevated systemic IgG4 serum levels compared with GERD patients can be seen and decrease under topical steroid therapy. Also, local IgG4 plasma cells expression is high in EoE, but not in GERD patients and normalize under therapy. These findings are further proof for a possible association of EoE with IgG4.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Biopsy; Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diagnosis, Differential; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagus; Female; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Young Adult

Lymphocytic esophagitis (LyE) is a rare chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus, which shares clinical characteristics with the eosinophilic esophagitis. The most important part of its treatment is proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Referring to locally acting steroids, evidence-based treatment strategies are missing.. A 62-year-old patient presented for evaluation of his chronic dysphagia with previously diagnosed multiple oesophageal stenoses. Endoscopy revealed diffusely distributed esophageal rings and furrows and the diagnosis of LyE was established after immunohistochemical analysis of multiple mucosal biopsies. We initiated therapy with budesonide in the form of capsules (Entocort 3 × 3 mg Hartkapseln. Our case report is meant to describe an empirical therapeutic concept, which led to clinical and histological remission of chronic LyE.. Die lymphozytäre Ösophagitis (Englisch: lymphocytic esophagitis-LyE) ist eine seltene chronisch-entzündliche Erkrankung der Speiseröhre, die klinisch ähnliche Charakteristika wie die eosinophile Ösophagitis aufweist. Der wichtigste Bestandteil der Behandlung sind die Protonenpumpenhemmer. Für die lokal wirkenden Steroide gibt es kein festes Therapieregime.. Ein 62-jähriger Patient stellte sich zur Abklärung einer chronischen Dysphagie mit zuvor diagnostizierten multiplen Ösophagusstenosen vor. Endoskopisch zeigte sich das Bild einer Pseudotrachealisierung mit diffus verteilten Ösophagusringen und Furchen. Die Diagnose der LyE wurde anhand der immunhistochemischen Analyse der Schleimhautbiopsien gestellt. Wir behandelten initial mit Budesonid in Form von Kapseln (Entocort 3 × 3 mg Hartkapseln. Unsere Kasuistik berichtet über ein rein empirisches Therapiekonzept, was zur klinischen und histologischen Remission einer chronisch verlaufenden LyE geführt hat.

Topics: Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Middle Aged; Off-Label Use

Few factors have been identified that can be used to predict response of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) to topical steroid treatment. We aimed to determine whether baseline clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and molecular features of EoE can be used to predict histologic response.. We collected data from 97 patients with EoE, from 2009 through 2015, treated with a topical steroid for 8 weeks; 59 patients had a histologic response to treatment. Baseline clinicopathologic features and gene expression patterns were compared between patients with a histologic response to treatment (<15 eos/hpf) and non-responders (≥15 eos/hpf). We performed sensitivity analyses for alternative histologic response definitions. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictive factors associated with response to therapy, which were assessed with area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curves.. Baseline dilation was the only independent predictor of non-response (odds ratio [OR], 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.89). When an alternate response (<1 eos/hpf) and non-response (<50% decrease in baseline eos/hpf) definition was used, independent predictors of response status were age (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14), food allergies (OR, 12.95; 95% CI, 2.20-76.15), baseline dilation (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.88), edema or decreased vascularity (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04-1.03), and hiatal hernia (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.66). Using these 5 factors, we developed a predictive model that discriminated complete responders from non-responders with an AUROC of 0.88. Baseline gene expression patterns were not associated with treatment response and did not change with different histologic response thresholds.. In an analysis of 97 patients with EoE, we found dilation to be the only baseline factor associated with non-response to steroid treatment (<15 eos/hpf). However, a model comprising 5 clinical, endoscopic, and histologic factors identified patients with a complete response (<1 eos/hpf). A baseline gene expression panel was not predictive of treatment response at any threshold.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Biomarkers; Biopsy; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Esophagus; Female; Fluticasone; Follow-Up Studies; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Allergens; Arachis; Biopsy; Budesonide; Deglutition; Deglutition Disorders; Desensitization, Immunologic; Endoscopy, Digestive System; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Peanut Hypersensitivity; Plant Proteins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune/antigen-mediated disorder defined by eosinophilic-predominant inflammation and esophageal dysfunction.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Budesonide; Combined Modality Therapy; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Fluticasone; Humans; Steroids

.

Topics: Budesonide; Deglutition Disorders; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Achalasia; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Young Adult

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is treated with dietary modification and/or pharmacologic management with swallowed topical steroids. Swallowed fluticasone propionate (FP) and oral viscous budesonide (OVB) have proven to be effective in resolving symptoms and reversing histologic changes in children and adults with EoE. There are minimal comparative studies between the 2 agents.. The aim of the study was to retrospectively compare endoscopic and histologic outcomes after FP versus OVB therapy in children with EoE in our center.. We performed a retrospective chart review of subjects diagnosed with EoE at a tertiary care center between 2010 and 2015. Inclusion criteria were FP or OVB therapy for ≥8 weeks along with pre- and post-treatment endoscopic evaluation. Demographic and clinical features and endoscopic and histologic assessment were recorded for comparative analysis. Histologic response was defined as <15 eos/hpf and remission as <5 eos/hpf.. The study included 68 EoE patients (20 FP and 48 OVB) with a mean age of 10.6 ± 5.2 years (range 1-20 years); 81% were boys and 68% were Caucasian. No significant demographic or clinical differences were noted between the 2 study groups. Overall histologic response to topical steroids was seen in 44 of 68 (65%) patients. A significantly greater number of patients achieved histologic response with OVB (36/48, 75%) than with FP (8/20, 40%) (P = 0.0059). Mean pretreatment peak eos/hpf was 46 ± 19 in the FP group versus 45 ± 23 in the OVB group. Mean post-treatment peak eos/hpf was 20 ± 29 in the FP group versus 12 ± 16 in the OVB group (P = 0.002). There was also a significantly greater difference in the change of absolute eos/hpf from pre- to post-treatment in the OVB group (-33) versus FP (18) (P = 0.047). A greater number of OVB-treated patients without asthma had a histologic response compared to those with asthma (P = 0.031). The response to OVB was not affected by the delivery vehicle, namely sucralose (Splenda) versus Neocate Duocal.. Our data suggest that treatment with OVB leads to better endoscopic and histologic outcomes than FP. Adherence to treatment and history of asthma are major determining factors in the response to treatments. Using Neocate Duocal as the OVB delivery vehicle is just as effective as sucralose.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Infant; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathologic disorder characterized histologically by esophageal eosinophilia. Oral viscous budesonide (OVB) is an effective treatment with remission rates reported between 55% and 87%; however, topical corticosteroids are associated with increased risk of candidal esophagitis and adrenal suppression. Attempts to decrease the daily dose of topical steroids have resulted in disease relapse. The objective of this study was to determine whether or not reducing the frequency of OVB administration would be effective in controlling esophageal eosinophilia in children and adolescents.. Data were obtained by retrospective chart review of patients at Boston Children's Hospital diagnosed with EoE, based on endoscopic findings of >15 eosinophils per high power field (eos/HPF) on esophageal biopsies while on acid blockade. Patients with histologic evidence of response (<15 eos/HPF) while on daily OVB had been offered the option of maintenance therapy based on a Monday-Wednesday-Friday (MWF) dosing regimen. Changes in peak esophageal eosinophil counts over time were examined.. Eight male patients ages 5 to 18 years attained clinical response while receiving daily OVB and were subsequently maintained on a MWF OVB dosing regimen for 3 to 7 months. All 8 patients showed an increase in peak esophageal eosinophils, with 7 of 8 (88%) experiencing disease relapse. In fact, the distribution of peak esophageal eosinophils after MWF dosing was not statistically different from peak levels at diagnosis (P = 0.95).. An MWF dosing regimen of OVB was not effective at maintaining histologic response in children and adolescents with EoE. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm these results.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Viscosity

Few studies have examined combined or alternating treatment algorithms in eosinophilic esophagitis.. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to ascertain the efficacy and adherence to a combined and alternating treatment approach with topical corticosteroids and 2-food elimination diet for pediatric EoE.. Patients were prescribed a 2-food elimination diet (milk and soy) and topical corticosteroid (fluticasone or oral viscous budesonide) for 3 months, after which the steroid was discontinued and 2-food elimination diet continued for 3 months. An EGD was performed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data were extracted from electronic medical records. Nonparametric tests assessed adherence and outcomes.. Twenty-nine eosinophilic esophagitis cases were included (mean age 11.5 years, 61% male). Complete adherence to combined therapy and 2-food elimination diet alone was 75 and 79%, respectively. Median eosinophil counts decreased from 51 to 2 eosinophils/hpf (p < 0.001) after combined treatment and rebounded to 31 (p = 0.07) after 2FED alone. Dysphagia improved after both the combined and 2-food elimination diet alone treatment approaches (52 vs. 11% and 10%; p = 0.001, 0.005). Nonsignificant improvements in endoscopic findings were documented across the length of follow-up.. An initial combined treatment approach resulted in significant improvements in symptoms and histologic findings. While symptomatic improvements continued with 2-food elimination diet alone, the histologic improvement was not maintained. While loss to follow-up may obscure the efficacy of 2-food elimination diet alone, a combined/alternating treatment approach merits assessment in a larger prospective study.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Combined Modality Therapy; Deglutition Disorders; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Esophagoscopy; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Leukocyte Count; Male; Medication Adherence; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Budesonide; Deglutition Disorders; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Female; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction; Male; Proton Pump Inhibitors

It is unknown if successful control of esophageal inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) decreases the need for subsequent esophageal dilation. We aimed to determine whether histologic response to topical steroid treatment decreases the likelihood and frequency of subsequent esophageal dilation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Patients with an incident diagnosis of EoE were included if they had an initial esophageal dilation, received topical steroids, and had a subsequent endoscopy with biopsies. The number of dilations performed in each group was determined, and histologic responders (<15 eos/hpf) were compared to nonresponders. The 55 EoE patients included (27 responders and 28 nonresponders) underwent a mean of 3.0 dilations over a median follow-up of 19 months. Responders required fewer dilations than nonresponders (1.6 vs. 4.6, P = 0.03), after adjusting for potential confounders. Despite undergoing significantly fewer dilations, responders achieved a similar increase in esophageal diameter with dilation (4.9 vs. 5.0 mm; P = 0.92). In EoE patients undergoing esophageal dilation at baseline, control of inflammation with topical steroids was associated with a 65% decrease in the number of subsequent dilations to maintain the same esophageal caliber. This suggests that inflammation control is an important goal in patients with fibrostenotic changes of EoE.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biopsy; Budesonide; Dilatation; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagus; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been reported to be more prevalent in patients with esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF). To date, there is limited data on the management of EoE in this group of patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment outcomes of EoE in children with EA-TEF. A retrospective chart review was performed on all EA-TEF children who were diagnosed with and treated for EoE between January 2000 and September 2013 at the Sydney Children's Hospital. Data collected included details of the patient's treatment, post-treatment endoscopy, symptoms and nutrition. Twenty patients were included in the study. Median age at diagnosis was 26 months (8-103 months), and median time from diagnosis to last follow-up was 23 months (2-132 months). Patients were treated with budesonide slurry, swallowed fluticasone, elimination diet alone or in combination. All patients were on proton pump inhibitors at time of diagnosis of EoE which was continued. Six out of seven patients who had furrowing/exudate in endoscopy at diagnosis had complete resolution at a median follow-up period of 26 months (P = 0.031). Median peak intraepithelial eosinophil count reduced significantly from 30/high-powered field (HPF) (19-80/HPF) to 8/HPF (0-85/HPF) (median time for improvement = 24 months) (P = 0.015). There was a significant reduction in symptoms of dysphagia and reflux post-treatment (P < 0.001). Prevalence of strictures significantly decreased (P = 0.016), as did need for dilatations (P = 0.004). In four out of six patients with gastrostomies at baseline, the feeding improved on treatment of EoE and the gastrostomy could be closed. There was also a nonsignificant trend towards improvement in weight and height 'z scores' of the patients. Treatment of EoE in children with EA-TEF was found to significantly reduce intraepithelial eosinophil count, symptoms, strictures and need for dilatations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Deglutition Disorders; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Atresia; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagoscopy; Female; Fluticasone; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Infant; Male; Retrospective Studies; Tracheoesophageal Fistula; Treatment Outcome

Esophageal biopsy specimens from patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) can feel firm, with resistance felt when pulling the forceps to obtain the tissue sample. We aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of the esophageal biopsy "pull" sign and determine its histologic associations and response to treatment.. This was a prospective cohort study of adults undergoing outpatient upper endoscopy. Cases of EoE were diagnosed per consensus guidelines, and patients were subsequently treated with either topical steroids or dietary elimination. Control subjects were individuals who did not have EoE. The frequency of the esophageal biopsy "pull" sign was assessed in EoE patients and controls, and diagnostic metrics were calculated. The "pull" sign was also reassessed in patients after therapy.. A total of 83 EoE patients and 121 control subjects were included. Sixty-three EoE patients (76%) were "pull" sign positive compared with just 2 control subjects (2%; P < .001), corresponding to a sensitivity and specificity of 76% and 98%, positive and negative predictive values of 97% and 86%, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 45.9 and 0.245, respectively. The "pull" sign was the strongest endoscopic predictor of EoE case status at baseline and was less frequent after successful treatment (20% vs 79%; P < .001).. The "pull" sign is highly specific for EoE and is rarely seen in non-EoE control subjects. In patients with EoE who respond to treatment, the "pull" sign often resolves. The "pull" sign may be a simple and easily obtained measure of esophageal remodeling.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adult; Biopsy; Budesonide; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Female; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Young Adult

In eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), dysphagia, which might reflect esophageal dysmotility, is the most common symptom. High-resolution manometry (HRM) has become widely accepted for evaluating esophageal motility disorders, but to date has been sparsely examined in EoE patients, particularly under therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate HRM in symptomatic EoE-patients under topical steroid treatment.. In this prospective observational study, symptomatic EoE patients received HRM-examinations before and after 8 weeks of topical steroid treatment with budesonide. All HRM-abnormalities were assessed and interpreted according to the Chicago classification. The primary endpoint was the influence of topical steroid treatment on the intrabolus pressure (IBP). Clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings and histological esophageal eosinophilic load were also reported.. Twenty symptomatic EoE patients were included. Overall success of budesonide therapy was 85% regarding complete histologic remission and 80% regarding complete clinical remission. High-resolution manometry showed abnormal esophageal motility in 35% of patients at baseline, which was resolved after therapy in 86% of these patients. Most frequent HRM-findings were early pan-esophageal pressurizations and weak persitalsis. There was no significant reduction of the IBP under therapy (before: 12.5 ± 4.9 mmHg, after: 10.9 ± 2.9 mmHg; p = 0.119).. Although dysphagia is the leading symptom of EoE, HRM is able to identify esophageal motility disorders in only some EoE patients. Observed motility disorders resolve after successful treatment in almost all of these patients. Intrabolus pressure does not seem an optimal parameter for the monitoring of successful treatment response in EoE patients.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Humans; Male; Manometry; Prospective Studies

Topics: Adult; Ascites; Biopsy; Budesonide; Colonoscopy; Diarrhea; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hypereosinophilic Syndrome; Ileal Diseases; Male; Remission Induction; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic Th2 and food antigen-mediated disease characterized by esophageal eosinophilic infiltration. Thymic stromal lymphopoetin (TSLP), an epithelial derived cytokine which bridges innate and Th2-type adaptive immune responses in other allergic conditions, is overexpressed in esophageal biopsies of EoE subjects. However, the triggers of TSLP expression in the esophageal epithelium are unknown. The objective of the current study was to characterize TSLP expression in human esophageal epithelium in EoE in vivo and to determine the role of food antigens upon epithelial TSLP expression in vitro. Using immunohistochemistry (IHC), we localized TSLP in esophageal biopsies of active EoE (≥15 eos/hpf), inactive EoE (<15 eos/hpf) and non-EoE control subjects, and found that TSLP expression was restricted to the differentiated suprabasal layer of the epithelium in actively inflamed EoE biopsies. Consistent with these results in vivo, inducible TSLP protein secretion was higher in CaCl2 differentiated telomerase-immortalized esophageal epithelial cells (EPC2-hTERT) compared to undifferentiated cells of the basal phenotype, following stimulation with the TLR3 ligand poly(I:C). To determine whether food antigens could directly induce epithelial TSLP secretion, differentiated and undifferentiated primary esophageal epithelial cells from EoE and non-EoE subjects were challenged with food antigens clinically relevant to EoE: Chicken egg ovalbumin (OVA), wheat, and milk proteins beta-lactoglobulin (blg) and beta-casein. Food antigens failed to induce TSLP secretion by undifferentiated cells; in contrast, only OVA induced TSLP secretion in differentiated epithelial cells from both EoE and control cell lines, an effect abolished by budesonide and NF-κb inhibition. Together, our study shows that specific food antigens can trigger innate immune mediated esophageal TSLP secretion, suggesting that esophageal epithelial cells at the barrier surface may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of EoE by regulating TSLP expression.

Topics: Antigens; Budesonide; Cell Differentiation; Cell Line, Transformed; Cytokines; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Epithelial Cells; Esophagus; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; NF-kappa B; Poly I-C; Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin; Toll-Like Receptor 3

Topics: Adrenal Insufficiency; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Deglutition; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Fluticasone; Humans

Topical steroids are first-line treatment agents for eosinophilic esophagitis; however, some studies have demonstrated modest efficacy in inducing histologic remission.. The aim of this study was to determine response to two topical steroids (fluticasone and budesonide), compare their efficacy, and examine patient characteristics which could predict non-response to topical steroids.. We performed a retrospective review of an established EoE registry. Inclusion criteria were patients >1 year of age who were diagnosed with EoE as defined by the most recent consensus guidelines. All patients were treated with an 8-week course of either swallowed fluticasone or viscous budesonide. Responders were defined as achieving <15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf) in both proximal and distal esophageal biopsies. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and histologic features were examined.. The study cohort included 75 EoE patients with a median age of 33 years (range 2-64 years), 71 % adults, 84 % male, and 76 % Caucasian. Overall histologic response rate to topical steroids was 51 %, while clinical response was 71 %. There was no significant differences in histologic response to treatment between children and adults (68 vs. 44 %, p = 0.111). There was no significant difference in response between males and females (47 vs. 73 %, p = 0.191) and between the two types of steroids (48 vs. 56 %, p = 0.632). Responders and non-responders were similar in clinical presentation and baseline endoscopic findings. Following treatment, responders had significantly less peak proximal (4.0 ± 4.4 vs. 46 ± 53, p < 0.001) and distal eosinophil counts (3.5 ± 3.8 vs. 60 ± 47, p < 0.001) compared to non-responders. There were no predictors of response to steroids identified.. Histologic response to treatment was observed in approximately half the cohort, while more than two-thirds experienced clinical response to topical steroids. Response was similar between fluticasone and budesonide. Given the lack of differences in clinical presentation or endoscopic features, predictors of non-response were not seen.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult

Noninvasive biomarkers would be valuable for diagnosis and monitoring of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The aim of this study was to determine the utility of a panel of serum biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of EoE.. We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive adults undergoing outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Incident cases of EoE were diagnosed per consensus guidelines; controls had gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or dysphagia and did not meet the EoE criteria. EoE cases were treated with topical steroids and had repeat endoscopy. Pre- and post-treatment serum samples were analyzed in a blinded manner for interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-13, transforming growth factor (TGF)-α, TGF-β, tumor necrosis factor-α, eotaxin-1, -2, and -3, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), major basic protein, and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin. Cases and controls were compared at baseline, and pre- and post-treatment assays were compared in cases.. A total of 61 incident EoE cases and 87 controls were enrolled; 51 EoE cases had post-treatment serum analyzed. There were no significant differences in any of the biomarkers between EoE cases and controls at baseline. IL-13 and eotaxin-3 for cases and controls were 85 ± 160 vs. 43 ± 161 pg/ml (P=0.12) and 41 ± 159 vs. 21 ± 73 (P=0.30). There were no significant differences in assay values among cases before and after treatment. There were also no differences after stratification by atopic status or treatment response.. A panel of inflammatory factors known to be associated with EoE pathogenesis were not increased in the serum, nor were they responsive to therapy. None of these biomarkers are likely candidates for a serum test for EoE. Histologic analysis for diagnosis and management of EoE continues to be necessary, and novel, less invasive, biomarkers are needed.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Biomarkers; Budesonide; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Cytokines; Deglutition Disorders; Endoscopy, Digestive System; Eosinophil Major Basic Protein; Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagus; Female; Fluticasone; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Transforming Growth Factors

We sought to determine the prevalence of adrenal suppression (AS) in children with eosinophilic esophagitis treated with oral viscous budesonide (OVB). This was a retrospective review of a quality assurance initiative, whereby all children in our center treated with OVB for ≥3 months were referred over an 18-month time frame for endocrine assessment including 1 μg adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test. Fourteen of 19 children complied with the referral; of these 14 children, 6 (43%) had suboptimal stimulated cortisol (range 343-497 nmol/L, mean [±SD] 424.7 nmol/L [±52.4], normal ≥500 nmol/L). There was no significant association to treatment duration, dose, or concomitant use of inhaled/nasal corticosteroids. This study suggests that children treated with OVB may be at risk for AS.

Topics: Adolescent; Adrenal Insufficiency; Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Asthma; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Male; Retrospective Studies

The aim of the present study was to assess the incidence, characteristics, therapeutic approach, and response to therapy of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in a pediatric population from Slovenia.. A retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of children newly diagnosed as having EoE, ages 0 to 18 years, residing in Slovenia, in the period between 2005 and 2012. For each child presenting symptoms, family and personal history of allergies, blood, skin and patch allergy tests, endoscopic and histological findings, types of therapy, and therapeutic success were recorded.. In total, 25 patients of EoE were identified during the study period. The mean annual incidence (per 100,000 children) was 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-1.16). The incidences of EoE increased from 0.2 (0.01-1.36), 0.3 (0.01-1.38), and 0.3 (0.01-1.40) in the period 2005-2007, respectively, to 1.8 (0.72-3.76), 1.0 (0.28-2.60), and 1.8 (0.72-3.65) in the period 2010-2012, respectively (P = 0.002). In 9 patients, symptomatic and histological remissions were achieved with specific food elimination diet: in 8 with 6-food elimination diet and in 1 with an additional budesonide. In majority of patients, budesonide improved only symptoms, but esophageal eosinophilia persisted. Twenty percent of our children had improvement of histology and symptoms of EoE in spite of gradual reintroduction of all food and stopping all medication.. The annual incidence of childhood EoE in Slovenia is comparable with the reports from the developed European countries, and it increased by 6-folds in the last decade.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Humans; Incidence; Infant; Male; Retrospective Studies; Slovenia

Topics: Adrenal Insufficiency; Budesonide; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male

Topics: Budesonide; Child, Preschool; Combined Modality Therapy; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Lansoprazole; Male; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is an inflammatory condition characterized by a dense eosinophilic infiltrate. The migration of eosinophils into the oesophagus is influenced by cytokines such as IL-5, IL-13 and eotaxin-3. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the cytokine expression profiles (IL-5, IL-13 and eotaxin-3/CCL26) in children after topical steroid treatment.. a prospective case-control study was performed in 23 paediatric patients (age 5-16 years) with a histological diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis. Histological evaluation and cytokine levels assay (IL-5, IL-13 and eotaxin-3/CCL26) in the proximal and distal oesophagus were performed before, and after 8 weeks of topical budesonide. Data were compared with a matched healthy control group.. quantitative expression levels of IL-5, IL-13 and eotaxin-3 were significantly higher in the eosinophilic oesophagitis group both compared to healthy subjects (p<0.0001). A significant reduction of the eosinophil infiltrate as well as of IL-5, IL-13 and eotaxin-3 mucosal profiles was observed after steroid treatment both at the proximal and distal oesophagus (p<0.0001).. IL-5, IL-13 and eotaxin-3/CCL26 are significantly over-expressed in the oesophageal epithelium of children with eosinophilic oesophagitis. Topical steroid treatment (inhaled and swallowed budesonide) can induce clinical response with partial mucosal remission.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Case-Control Studies; Chemokine CCL26; Chemokines, CC; Child; Cytokines; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagus; Female; Humans; Interleukin-13; Interleukin-5; Male; Mucous Membrane; Prospective Studies

Oral viscous budesonide (OVB) using Splenda as a delivery vehicle has become an attractive therapeutic option for children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Many families are wary of giving the artificial sweetener in high doses to their children. The aim of the present study was to determine whether OVB mixed with Neocate Nutra, a hypoallergenic nutritional supplement, is at least as efficacious as OVB mixed with Splenda at healing EoE.. Our institutional review board approved a retrospective chart review of patients with well-documented EoE treated with OVB at the Boston Children's Hospital Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorder program between June 2008 and June 2013. Primary outcome measured was histologic response defined as change in peak eosinophil count to <15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/HPF) after at least 10 weeks of OVB therapy.. A total of 46 children were treated with OVB mixed with Splenda, and 14 were treated with OVB mixed with Neocate Nutra. The 2 groups were not significantly different in their demographic (race, age, sex) or clinical (initial eosinophil count, proton pump inhibitor use, or concomitant dietary elimination) characteristics. On follow-up endoscopy, 30 of 46 patients on Splenda and 13 of 14 patients on Neocate Nutra achieved histologic response. Mean pretreatment and posttreatment peak eosinophil counts for the children taking Neocate Nutra were 62 eos/HPF ([high-power field] range 20-120 eos/HPF) and 9 eos/HPF (range 0-100 eos/HPF), respectively. Mean pretreatment and posttreatment peak eosinophil counts for the Splenda group were 59.5 eos/HPF (range 20-180 eos/HPF) and 25.5 eos/HPF (range 0-200 eos/HPF), respectively. The odds ratio (OR) of success with Neocate Nutra as compared with Splenda was 6.93 (95% CI 0.83-57.91, P = 0.0728), demonstrating the noninferiority of Neocate Nutra.. We demonstrate that OVB mixed with Neocate Nutra is at least as effective as OVB mixed with Splenda at treating children with EoE. Neocate Nutra is an innovative, effective, and palatable mixing agent to create a viscous budesonide slurry for families who prefer not to use the standard recipe with Splenda.

Topics: Adolescent; Amino Acids; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Carbohydrates; Cell Count; Child; Child, Preschool; Dietary Fats; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Esophagoscopy; Female; Humans; Male; Pharmaceutical Vehicles; Retrospective Studies; Sucrose

Long-lasting food impactions requiring endoscopic bolus removal occur frequently in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and harbor a risk for severe esophageal injuries. We evaluated whether treatment with swallowed topical corticosteroids is able to reduce the risk of occurrence of this complication.. We analyzed data from the Swiss EoE Cohort Study. Patients with yearly clinic visits, during which standardized assessment of symptoms, endoscopic, histologic, and laboratory findings was carried out, were included.. A total of 206 patients (157 males) were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 5 years with a total of 703 visits (mean 3.41 visits/patient). During the follow-up period, 33 patients (16 % of the cohort) experienced 42 impactions requiring endoscopic bolus removal. We evaluated the following factors regarding the outcome 'bolus impaction' by univariate logistic regression modeling: swallowed topical corticosteroid therapy (OR 0.503, 95%-CI 0.255-0.993, P = 0.048), presence of EoE symptoms (OR 1.150, 95%-CI 0.4668-2.835, P = 0.761), esophageal stricture (OR 2.832, 95%-CI 1.508-5.321, P = 0.001), peak eosinophil count >10 eosinophils/HPF (OR 0.724, 95%-CI 0.324-1.621, P = 0.433), blood eosinophilia (OR 1.532, 95%-CI 0.569-4.118, P = 0.398), and esophageal dilation (OR 1.852, 95%-CI 1.034-3.755, P = 0.017). In the multivariate model, the following factors were significantly associated with bolus impaction: swallowed topical corticosteroid therapy (OR 0.411, 95%-CI 0.203-0.835, P = 0.014) and esophageal stricture (OR 2.666, 95%-CI 1.259-5.645, P = 0.01). Increasing frequency of use of swallowed topical steroids was associated with a lower risk for bolus impactions.. Treatment of EoE with swallowed topical corticosteroids significantly reduces the risk for long-lasting bolus impactions.

Topics: Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Cohort Studies; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Young Adult

Topics: Allergens; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Cottonseed Oil; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Food Hypersensitivity; Garlic; Humans; Immunoglobulin E; Male; Middle Aged

Topics: Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Diet, Gluten-Free; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagoscopy; Fluticasone; Food, Formulated; Humans

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is the most frequent condition found in a group of gastrointestinal disorders called eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases. The hypothetical pathophysiological mechanism is related to a hypersensitivity reaction. Gastroesophageal reflux disease-like complaints not ameliorated by acid blockade or occasional symptoms of dysphagia or food impaction are likely presentations of EE. Due to its unclear pathogenesis and unspecific symptoms, it is difficult to diagnose EE without a strong suspicion. Although histological criteria are necessary to diagnosis EE, there are some characteristic endoscopic features. We present the case of a healthy 55-year-old woman with dysphagia and several episodes of esophageal food impaction over the last six months. This case report stresses the most distinguishing endoscopic findings-mucosa rings, white exudative plaques and linear furrows-that can help in the prompt recognition of this condition.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Biopsy; Budesonide; Endoscopy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagus; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Chronic Disease; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Secondary Prevention

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Male

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Budesonide; Case-Control Studies; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Humans; Lymphocyte Count; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory