pulmicort and Colitis--Ulcerative

Ulcerative proctitis (UP) is a common highly symptomatic form of ulcerative colitis that can be difficult to treat.. To assess the efficacy of medical treatments for UP.. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on 23 November 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of medical therapy for adults with UP. Primary outcomes included induction and maintenance of clinical remission. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome.. We included 53 RCTs (n = 4096) including 46 induction studies (n = 3731) and seven maintenance studies (n = 365). First-line therapies included topical 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), conventional corticosteroids, budesonide, and oral 5-ASA. Therapy for refractory UP included topical tacrolimus and small molecules. Topical 5-ASA was superior to placebo for induction (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.94-3.82) and maintenance of remission (RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.26-3.46). Topical corticosteroids were superior to placebo for induction of remission (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.62-4.92). Topical budesonide was superior to placebo for induction of remission (RR 2.34, 95% CI 1.44-3.81). Combination therapy with topical 5-ASA and topical corticosteroids was superior to topical monotherapy with either agent. Topical tacrolimus was superior to placebo. Etrasimod was superior to placebo for induction (RR 4.71, 95% CI 1.2-18.49) and maintenance of remission (RR 2.08, 95% CI 1.31-3.32).. Topical 5-ASA and corticosteroids are effective for active UP. Topical 5-ASA may be effective for maintenance of remission. Tacrolimus may be effective for induction of remission. Etrasimod may be effective for induction and for maintenance of remission. Trials should include UP to expand the evidence base for this under-represented population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Mesalamine; Proctitis; Remission Induction; Tacrolimus

We performed a systematic review to investigate the definition of mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis (UC), and to describe predictors of good response to treatment in clinical trials assessing 5-ASA and/or budesonide. Thirty-nine randomized controlled trials were included. The UC Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) was the most frequent score used for defining mild to moderate active UC (16 studies, 41%), followed by Clinical Activity Index in 11 studies (28.2%). Four different cut-offs were used to define mild to moderate active UC using the UCDAI. The most frequently reported predictors of good response to treatment was a mild and moderate disease activity. There is heterogeneity in the definition of mild to moderate active UC in randomized clinical trials. A standardized definition of mild to moderate active UC used for inclusion of patients in clinical trials is needed.

Topics: Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Mesalamine

The human race is consistently striving for achieving good health and eliminate disease-causing factors. For the last few decades, scientists have been endeavoring to invent and innovate technologies that can substitute the conventional dosage forms and enable targeted and prolonged drug release at a particular site. The novel multi-matrix technology is a type of matrix formulation where the formulation is embraced to have a matrix system with multiple number of matrices. The MMX technology embraces with a combination of outer hydrophilic layer and amphiphilic/lipophilic core layer, within which drug is encapsulated followed by enteric coating for extended/targeted release at the required site. In comparison to conventional oral drug delivery systems and other drug delivery systems, multi-matrix (MMX) technology formulations afford many advantages. Additionally, it attributes for targeting strategy aimed at the colon and offers modified prolonged drug release. Thus, it has emerged rapidly as a potential alternative option in targeted oral drug delivery. However, the development of this MMX technology formulations is a exigent task and also has its own set of limitations. Due to its promising advantages and colon targeting strategy over the other colon targeted drug delivery systems, premier global companies are exploiting its potential. This article review deep insights into the formulation procedures, drug delivery mechanism, advantages, limitations, safety and efficacy studies of various marketed drug formulations of MMX technology including regulatory perspectives and future perspectives.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Mesalamine; Retrospective Studies; Technology

Corticosteroids are a nonspecific immune modulator used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Topical and systemic forms of corticosteroids have been shown to be effective in induction of clinical remission and remain first-line therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis. A large proportion of patients experience adverse effects, however, including some serious adverse effects, including infection and increased mortality. Newer formulations of gut selective corticosteroids have reduced adverse effects associated with steroids.

Topics: Budesonide; Colectomy; Colitis, Ulcerative; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Infliximab; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Methylprednisolone; Prednisone; Remission Induction; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Pouchitis occurs in approximately 50% of patients following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (UC).. The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies for prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis.. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 25 July 2018. We also searched references, trials registers, and conference proceedings.. Randomized controlled trials of prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis in adults who underwent IPAA for UC were considered for inclusion.. Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE. The primary outcome was clinical improvement or remission in participants with acute or chronic pouchitis, or the proportion of participants with no episodes of pouchitis after IPAA. Adverse events (AEs) was a secondary outcome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each dichotomous outcome.. Fifteen studies (547 participants) were included. Four studies assessed treatment of acute pouchitis. Five studies assessed treatment of chronic pouchitis. Six studies assessed prevention of pouchitis. Three studies were low risk of bias. Three studies were high risk of bias and the other studies were unclear. Acute pouchitis: All ciprofloxacin participants (7/7) achieved remission at two weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.35, very low certainty evidence). No ciprofloxacin participants (0/7) had an AE compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.98; very low certainty evidence). AEs included vomiting, dysgeusia or transient peripheral neuropathy. Forty-three per cent (6/14) of metronidazole participants achieved remission at 6 weeks compared to 50% (6/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.96, very low certainty evidence). Fifty per cent (7/14) of metronidazole participants improved clinically at 6 weeks compared to 58% (7/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.74, very low certainty evidence). Fifty-seven per cent (8/14) of metronidazole participants had an AE compared to 25% (3/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.78 to 6.73, very low certainty evidence). AEs included anorexia, nausea, headache, asthenia, metallic taste, vomiting, paraesthesia, and depression. Twenty-five per cent (2/8) of rifaximin participants achieved remission at 4 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 6.11, 95% CI 0.33 to 111.71, very low certainty evidence). Thirty-eight per cent (3/8) of rifaximin participants improved clinically at 4 weeks compared to 30% (3/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.34 to 4.60, very low certainty evidence). Seventy-five per cent (6/8) of rifaximin participants had an AE compared to 50% (5/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.14, very low certainty evidence). AEs included diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, proctalgia, vomiting, thirst, candida, upper respiratory tract infection, increased hepatic enzyme, and cluster headache. Ten per cent (1/10) of Lactobacillus GG participants improved clinically at 12 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.14 to 65.90, very low certainty evidence). Chronic pouchitis: Eighty-five per cent (34/40) of De Simone Formulation (a probiotic formulation) participants maintained remission at 9 to 12 mont. At 12 months, 90% (18/20) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis compared to 60% (12/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.21, low certainty evidence). Another study found 100% (16/16) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 12 months compared to 92% (11/12) of the no treatment control group (RR 1.10, 95% 0.89 to 1.36, very low certainty evidence). Eighty-six per cent (6/7) of Bifidobacterium longum participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 6 months compared to 60% (3/5) of placebo participants (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.11, very low certainty evidence). Eleven per cent (1/9) of Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 24 months compared to 50% (4/8) of placebo participants (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.60, very low certainty evidence). Forty-six per cent (43/94) of allopurinol participants had no episodes of pouchitis at 24 months compared to 43% (39/90) of placebo participants (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.46; low certainty evidence). Eighty-one per cent (21/26) of tinidazole participants had no episodes of pouchitis over 12 months compared to 58% (7/12) of placebo participants (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.31, very low certainty evidence).. The effects of antibiotics, probiotics and other interventions for treating and preventing pouchitis are uncertain. Well designed, adequately powered studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.. La reservoritis ocurre en aproximadamente el 50% de los pacientes después de la anastomosis entre la bolsa ileal y el ano (IPAA, por sus siglas en inglés) para la colitis ulcerosa crónica (CU).. El objetivo primario fue determinar la eficacia y la seguridad de los tratamientos médicos para la prevención o el tratamiento de la reservoritis aguda o crónica. MÉTODOS DE BÚSQUEDA: Se hicieron búsquedas en MEDLINE, Embase y en CENTRAL, desde su inicio hasta el 25 julio 2018. También se buscó en las listas de referencias, registros de ensayos en curso y actas de congresos. CRITERIOS DE SELECCIÓN: Se consideraron para inclusión los ensayos controlados aleatorios de prevención o tratamiento de la reservoritis aguda o crónica en adultos a los que se les realiza IPAA para la CU. OBTENCIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LOS DATOS: Dos autores de la revisión, de forma independiente, evaluaron la elegibilidad de los estudios, extrajeron los datos y analizaron el riesgo de sesgo. La calidad de la evidencia se evaluó mediante los criterios GRADE. El resultado primario la mejoría clínica o remisión en los pacientes con reservoritis aguda o crónica, o la proporción de pacientes sin episodios de reservoritis después de IPAA. Se incluyeron los eventos adversos como resultado secundario. Se calculó el cociente de riesgos (CR) y el intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95% correspondiente para los resultados dicotómicos.. Se incluyeron 15 estudios (547 participantes). Cuatro estudios evaluaron el tratamiento de la reservoritis aguda. Cinco estudios evaluaron el tratamiento de la reservoritis crónica. Seis estudios evaluaron la prevención de la reservoritis. Tres estudios presentaban bajo de riesgo de sesgo. En tres estudios el riesgo fue alto y en los otros estudios fue poco claro. reservoritis aguda: Todos los pacientes que recibieron ciprofloxacina (7/7) lograron la remisión a las dos semanas en comparación con el 33% (3/9) de los pacientes que recibieron metronidazol (CR 2,68; IC del 95%: 1,13 a 6,35) (evidencia de certeza muy baja). Ninguno de los participantes que recibieron ciprofloxacina (0/7) presentó eventos adversos en comparación con el 33% (3/9) de los participantes que recibieron metronidazol (CR0,18; IC del 95%: 0,01 a 2,98; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Los eventos adversos incluyeron vómitos, disgeusia o neuropatía periférica transitoria. El 40% (6/14) de los participantes que recibieron metronidazol lograron la remisión a las 6 semanas en comparación con el 50% (6/12) de los participantes que recibieron enema de budesonida (CR 0,86; IC del 95%: 0,37 a 1,96; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 50% (7/14) de los participantes del grupo de metronidazol mejoraron clínicamente a las 6 semanas en comparación con el 58% (7/12) de los participantes que recibieron enema de budesonida (CR 0,86; IC del 95%: 0,42 a 1,74; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 57% (8/14) de los participantes del grupo de metronidazol presentaron eventos adversos en comparación con el 25% (3/12) de los participantes que recibieron enema de budesonida (CR 2,29; IC del 95%: 0,78 a 6,73; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Los eventos adversos incluyeron anorexia, náuseas, cefalea, astenia, sabor metálico, vómitos, parestesia y depresión. El 25% (2/8) de los participantes que recibieron rifaximina lograron la remisión a las 4semanas en comparación con el 0% (0/10) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 6,11; IC del 95%: 0,33 a 111,71; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 38% (3/8) de los participantes del grupo de rifaximina mejoraron clínicamente a las 4 semanas en comparación con el 30% (3/10) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,25; IC del 95%: 0,34 a 4,60; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El 75% (6/8) de los participantes del grupo de rifaximina presentaron un evento adverso en comparación con el 50% (5/10) de los participantes que recibieron placebo (CR 1,50; IC del 95%: 0. No se conocen los efectos de los antibióticos, probióticos y otras intervenciones para el tratamiento y la prevención de la reservoritis. Se necesitan estudios bien diseñados con poder estadístico suficiente para determinar la forma óptima de tratamiento y prevención de la reservoritis.

Topics: Anastomosis, Surgical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Budesonide; Ciprofloxacin; Colitis, Ulcerative; Enema; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Metronidazole; Postoperative Complications; Pouchitis; Probiotics; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Beclomethasone; Biological Availability; Budesonide; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Colitis, Ulcerative; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Remission Induction

The comparative efficacy, safety and tolerability of budesonide-MMX and oral mesalamine in active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) are unclear. We conducted a network meta-analysis to fill this evidence gap.. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, the Cochrane Library, clinical trial registries, regulatory agencies' websites and international conference proceedings, up to July 2018, to identify randomized controlled trials of adult patients with active, mild-to-moderate UC, comparing budesonide-MMX or mesalamine against placebo, or against each other, or different dosing strategies, for induction of remission. Two reviewers independently abstracted study data and outcomes, and assessed each trial's risk-of-bias.. We identified and synthesized evidence from 15 eligible trials including 4083 participants. Budesonide-MMX 9 mg/day and mesalamine >2.4 g/day had similar efficacy for induction of clinical and endoscopic remission (OR = 0.97; 0.59-1.60), both showing superiority over placebo (OR = 2.68; 1.75-4.10, and OR = 2.75; 1.94-3.90, respectively). Furthermore, mesalamine >2.4 g/day was more efficacious than mesalamine 1.6-2.4 g/day (odds ratio = 1.27; 1.03-1.56). Secondary analyses showed that mesalamine >2.4 g/day ranks at the top among comparator treatments regarding safety (serious adverse events; surface under the cumulative ranking area [SUCRA] 79.2%) and tolerability (treatment discontinuations or withdrawals from the study due to adverse events; SUCRA 96.7%). There was no evidence of inconsistency, while heterogeneity between studies and risk of publication bias were low.. Budesonide-MMX and mesalamine >2.4 g/day had similar efficacy for induction of clinical and endoscopic remission in active, mild-to-moderate UC; however, mesalamine >2.4 g/day showed better tolerability. Further high-quality research is warranted.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Delayed-Action Preparations; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Mesalamine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Approximately 50% of patients who have undergone IPAA surgery for Ulcerative Colitis (UC) develop at least 1 episode of pouchitis. Patients with pouchitis have a wide range of symptoms, endoscopic and histologic features, disease course, and prognosis. To date, there are no universally accepted diagnostic criteria in terms of endoscopy and histology; though, semi-objective assessments to diagnose pouchitis in patients with ileal pouch- anal anastomosis (IPAA) have been proposed using composite scores such as the Pouchitis Triad, Heidelberg Pouchitis Activity Score and Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI). In a systematic review that included four randomized trials evaluating five agents for the treatment of acute pouchitis, ciprofloxacin was more effective at inducing remission as compared with metronidazole. Rifaximin was not more effective than placebo, while budesonide enemas and metronidazole were similarly effective for inducing remission of acute pouchitis. Patients with pouchitis relapsing more than three times per year are advised maintenance therapy, and guidelines recommend ciprofloxacin or the probiotic VSL#3. In patients with antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, secondary factors associated with an antibiotic-refractory course should be sought and treated. In this review, we will discuss the prevention and management of pouchitis in Ulcerative Colitis patients.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Budesonide; Ciprofloxacin; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Male; Metronidazole; Pouchitis; Proctocolectomy, Restorative; Prognosis; Rifaximin

Budesonide belongs to low-bioavailability steroids class. A novel oral formulation of budesonide, which uses the Multi-Matrix System (MMX) for delivering drugs to the colon, is now available as a possible treatment of ulcerative colitis patients intolerant or not-responding to first-line therapy with 5-ASA. Areas covered: in this review we present information about the development and the use of budesonide MMX and we provide data about its mechanism of action as well as, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokynetics. Moreover, we present the available literature data about the efficacy and, mainly, the safety of budesonide-MMX. Expert opinion: budesonide-MMX is a new therapeutic option in mild-to-moderate UC patients. Its good safety profile in clinical trials undoubtedly represents a strength for a possible wide use in clinical practice, mainly if it will be confirmed by post-marketing data. Other indications, such as treatment of colonic Crohn's disease, could theoretically be considered, if sustained by reliable scientific data.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biological Availability; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Mesalamine; Severity of Illness Index

The majority of patients with ulcerative colitis have mildly to moderately active disease. To inform the management of patients with left-sided or extensive mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis, we assessed the comparative efficacy and tolerability of different therapies.. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched Epub, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to Dec 14, 2015, and updated on MEDLINE on March 1, 2018, for randomised controlled trials in adults (age ≥17 years) with left-sided or extensive mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Studies were included if patients were treated with oral sulfasalazine, diazo-bonded 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), mesalazine (low dose <2 g/day, standard dose 2-3 g/day, or high dose >3 g/day), controlled ileal-release budesonide, or budesonide multimatrix, alone or in combination with rectal 5-ASA therapy, and were compared with each other or placebo for induction or maintenance of clinical remission. The minimum duration of therapy was 4 weeks for trials of induction and 24 weeks for trials of maintenance therapy. We did pairwise and random-effects network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach, and calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs; agents were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria to appraise quality of evidence. We examined heterogeneity with the I. Our search identified 1316 unique studies, from which 75 randomised trials with 12 215 patients were eligible for analysis. Based on 48 induction randomised trials (8020 participants) that met inclusion criteria, combined oral and rectal 5-ASAs (SUCRA 0·99) and high-dose mesalazine (>3 g/day; SUCRA 0·82) were ranked highest for induction of remission. Both interventions were superior to standard-dose mesalazine (2-3 g/day; failure to induce remission with combined oral and rectal 5-ASAs OR 0·41, 95% CI 0·22-0·77; high-dose mesalazine 0·78, 0·66-0·93) with moderate confidence in estimates. On the basis of 28 randomised trials (4218 participants) that met inclusion criteria, all interventions were superior to placebo for maintenance of remission; however, neither combined oral and rectal 5-ASAs nor high-dose mesalazine were superior to standard-dose mesalazine.. In patients with mildly to moderately active left-sided or extensive ulcerative colitis, combined oral and topical mesalazine therapy and high-dose mesalazine are superior to standard-dose mesalazine for induction of remission, but not maintenance of remission. Standard-dose mesalazine might be preferred for maintenance in most patients.. None.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Rectal; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Mesalamine; Network Meta-Analysis; Remission Induction; Sulfasalazine

The risk of corticosteroid-associated adverse events can limit the use of systemic corticosteroids. Oral, topically acting, second-generation corticosteroids that deliver drug to the site of inflammation, and biologic therapies, are effective treatment alternatives. The aim of this review was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of topically acting corticosteroids and biologic therapies versus oral systemic corticosteroids for ulcerative colitis (UC).. The PubMed database was searched for clinical and observational trials, systematic reviews, and case reports/series published between January 1950 and September 30, 2016. Search terms used included "corticosteroids," "beclomethasone dipropionate," "budesonide," "infliximab," "adalimumab," "golimumab," and "vedolizumab" in combination with "ulcerative colitis" or "inflammatory bowel disease.". A total of 582 studies were identified from PubMed searches. Only 1 direct comparative trial for oral topically acting corticosteroids and systemic corticosteroids was available, and no comparative trials versus biologic therapies were identified. In patients with mild-to-moderate UC, short-term (4-8 wk) oral beclomethasone dipropionate or oral budesonide multimatrix system demonstrated safety profiles comparable with placebo with few corticosteroid-related adverse events reported. Based on long-term data in patients with moderate-to-severe UC, biologics have a generally tolerable adverse event profile, although infections, infusion reactions, and autoimmune disorders were frequently reported.. Second-generation corticosteroids, beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide multimatrix system, exhibited a favorable safety profile in patients with mild-to-moderate UC. For biologics, which are only indicated in moderate-to-severe UC, additional studies are needed to further ascertain the benefit to risk profile of these agents in patients with mild-to-moderate disease (see Video Abstract, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/IBD/B653).

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Beclomethasone; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index

Budesonide is a second-generation steroid with prominent topical effects and minimal systemic activity for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of budesonide foam in mild-to-moderate distal UC.. Comprehensive searches were performed to identify all eligible studies. Outcome measures were clinical remission, endoscopic improvement, elimination of rectal bleeding, and adverse events. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for each outcome. All statistical analyses were performed in STATA 12.0.. Three randomized placebo-controlled trials recruiting 711 patients with mild-to-moderate distal UC were included in this study. No significant bias and heterogeneity was identified. Pooled analyses showed that budesonide foam was significantly superior to placebo for induction of clinical remission (RR = 1.83, 95%CI: 1.41, 2.37; P < 0.001) and endoscopic improvement (RR = 1.44, 95%CI: 1.23, 1.68; P < 0.001), and eliminating rectal bleeding at week 2 (RR = 2.00, 95%CI: 1.50, 2.66; P < 0.001), week 4 (RR = 1.73, 95%CI: 1.42, 2.12; P < 0.001), and week 6 (RR = 1.76, 95%CI: 1.45, 2.14; P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events and therapeutic discontinuation because of adverse events between budesonide foam and placebo.. Budesonide foam is well tolerated and superior to placebo in inducing clinical remission and endoscopic improvement, and eliminating rectal bleeding for mild-to-moderate distal UC.

Topics: Adult; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Dosage Forms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Compounding; Female; Humans; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Placebo Effect; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Ulcerative colitis (uc) is a chronic condition and for the vast majority of patients, life-long treatment is required. low adherence to therapy is an emerging issue. since low adherence is associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased costs, it is becoming crucial to identify strategies in order to improve it. Areas covered: We performed literature searches in PubMed using the terms 'adherence', 'mesalamine', 'budesonide MMX', 'MMX technology' in combination with 'ulcerative colitis'. Firstly, we present the key-concepts of therapy for UC and discuss the problem of the adherence and how to measure it. Then, we provide data on the extent of the problem and the causes and consequences from clinical and economic point of views. Finally, we focus on treatment-related variables associated with non-adherence and treatment-related strategies to improve adherence, paying particular attention to Multi Matrix system (MMX) technology applied to mesalazine and budesonide. Expert commentary: The pharmaceutical industry and scientific community are making efforts to simplify treatments for UC. MMX technology, which allows a reduction in the number of pills to be taken and daily administrations, may facilitate adherence to treatment and carry further clinical benefits.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Carriers; Drug Compounding; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Medication Adherence; Mesalamine; Polymers; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic idiopathic inflammatory disorder in which patients cycle between active disease and remission. Budesonide multi-matrix (MMX) is an oral second-generation corticosteroid designed to deliver active drug throughout the colon. In pharmacokinetic studies, the mean relative absorption of budesonide in the region between the ascending colon and the descending/sigmoid colon was 95.9 %. In 2 identically designed, phase 3 studies (CORE I and II), budesonide MMX 9 mg once daily was efficacious and well tolerated for induction of remission of mild to moderate UC. Clinical and endoscopic remission rates were 17.9 % (CORE I) and 17.4 % (CORE II) for budesonide MMX 9 mg compared with 7.4 and 4.5 %, respectively, with placebo (p < 0.05, budesonide MMX 9 mg vs. placebo in both studies), 12.1 % with mesalamine 2.4 g, and 12.6 % with budesonide controlled ileal release capsules 9 mg. A 12-month maintenance therapy study suggested that budesonide MMX 6 mg may prolong time to clinical relapse: Median time was >1 year with budesonide MMX 6 mg versus 181 days (p = 0.02) with placebo; however, further studies are needed. In the CORE studies, budesonide MMX exhibited a favorable safety profile; the majority of adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity, and serious adverse events were uncommon. Furthermore, rates of potential glucocorticoid-related adverse events were comparable across treatment groups. The long-term (12-month) safety of budesonide MMX appears to be comparable with placebo. Data support budesonide MMX in the management algorithm of UC.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dosage Forms; Humans

Budesonide is a synthetic corticosteroid characterized by enhanced topical potency and limited systemic bioavailability. Its use in ulcerative colitis (UC) was limited to rectal preparations until recently when the new oral budesonide formulation incorporating the multi-matrix system technology was introduced. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current role of oral and rectal budesonide in managing UC patients Areas covered: In this paper, we described the chemical structure and pharmacologic characteristics of the different oral and rectal budesonide preparations, provided a summary of the published trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of budesonide in UC, and discussed the current status of its use in this population Expert opinion: Budesonide is effective in inducing remission in a subset of patients with mild-moderate UC. Nevertheless, the current evidence suggests inferiority of oral budesonide to 5-aminosalisylates (5-ASA) and systemic steroids, whereas rectal applications are comparable to other rectal steroid preparations, but still inferior to rectal 5-ASA. In clinical practice, several issues need clarification including, its exact position in the line of induction agents; the role of combining budesonide and 5-ASAs; the role of combining oral and rectal budesonide; and the role of budesonide in maintenance therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Rectal; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biological Availability; Budesonide; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Mesalamine; Remission Induction; Steroids; Treatment Outcome

Recently, several medical treatments for ulcerative colitis (UC) have been developed, including 5-aminosalicylic acids (5-ASAs), corticosteroids, thiopurine, calcineurin inhibitors, and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α treatments. Treatment options including calcineurin inhibitors and anti-TNF treatment for refractory UC are discussed in this article. Furthermore, upcoming treatments are introduced, such as golimumab, vedolizumab, AJM300, tofacitinib. Budesonide foamwill be used as one treatment option in patients with distal colitis. Herbal medicine, such as Qing-Dai is also effective for active UC and may be useful for patients who are refractory to anti-TNFα treatments. In the near future, physicians will able to use many different treatments for UC patients. However, we should not forget 5-ASA and corticosteroids as the fundamental treatments for UC patients.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Budesonide; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Forecasting; Gastrointestinal Agents; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Phenylalanine; Piperidines; Pyrimidines; Pyrroles; Quinazolinones; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Budesonide MMX(®) (Cortiment(®); Uceris(®)) is a novel once-daily oral formulation of budesonide using Multi Matrix (MMX(®)) colonic delivery technology to permit the release of budesonide at a controlled rate throughout the colon. It is available in the USA for the induction of remission in patients with active, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis, and in various European countries for the induction of remission in patients with active, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis where 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) therapy is not sufficient. In three 8-week multinational, phase III studies in patients with active, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis, once-daily budesonide MMX(®) 9 mg, as monotherapy (CORE I and II studies) or add-on therapy to 5-ASAs (CONTRIBUTE), was significantly more effective than placebo in inducing combined clinical and endoscopic remission. In an 8-week extension of the CORE I study, the efficacy of budesonide MMX(®) 9 mg monotherapy was demonstrated among patients who completed the CORE I study, but did not achieve clinical remission. In phase III studies, the tolerability profile of budesonide MMX(®) 9 mg as monotherapy or add-on therapy to 5-ASAs was generally similar to that of placebo. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in intensity, with exacerbation, relapse or worsening of ulcerative colitis, headache, nausea, abdominal pain and nasopharyngitis the most frequently reported following budesonide MMX(®) 9 mg monotherapy. Although final data from the CONTRIBUTE study are awaited, current evidence suggests budesonide MMX(®) 9 mg extends the treatment options currently available for patients with active, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Remission Induction; Severity of Illness Index

Cumulative safety and tolerability of budesonide MMX, a once-daily oral corticosteroid for inducing mild to moderate ulcerative colitis remission, was examined.. Data from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II or III studies [budesonide MMX 9 mg, 6 mg, or 3mg for 8 weeks]; one phase II study [randomisation to budesonide MMX 9 mg or placebo for 4 weeks, then open-label budesonide MMX 9 mg for 4 weeks]; and one open-label study [budesonide MMX 9 mg for 8 weeks] were pooled.. Patients randomised to budesonide MMX 9 mg [n = 288], 6 mg [n = 254], or placebo [n = 293] had similar rates of adverse events [AEs] [27.1%, 24.8%, and 23.9%, respectively] and serious AEs [2.4%, 2.0%, and 2.7%, respectively]; treatment-related AEs and serious AEs were reported by 11.8% and 13.5%, and 5.9% and 2.2%, respectively, of patients receiving budesonide MMX 3mg [n = 17] or open-label budesonide MMX 9 mg [n = 89]. Mean morning plasma cortisol concentrations were normal from baseline to final visit across randomised groups; in patients receiving open-label budesonide, mean cortisol concentration was 129.9 nmol/l after 4 weeks, returning to normal concentrations at final visit. Budesonide MMX was not associated with an overall increased risk for glucocorticoid-related adverse effects.. Budesonide MMX 9 mg was associated with normal mean cortisol concentrations at final visit and an AE incidence comparable to placebo. Overall, budesonide MMX was safe and well tolerated for inducing remission of patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biomarkers; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Induction Chemotherapy; Male; Middle Aged; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the colon, characterized by diffuse mucosal inflammation, bloody diarrhea, and urgency. The mainstay of treatment has been mesalamine agents, steroids, thiopurines, and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) antibodies. Over the past several years, new therapies have emerged which have provided clinicians new treatment options as well as new challenges in deciding which treatment is best for their patient at given points in their disease course. These agents include budesonide-Multi-Matrix System (MMX), adalimumab, golimumab, and vedolizumab. In addition, randomized controlled trials have investigated a combination therapy of infliximab and azathioprine and a controlled trial of infliximab versus cyclosporine for intravenous steroid refractory UC. This review will focus on where these agents may be optimally positioned in treatment algorithms for UC.

Topics: Adalimumab; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Gastrointestinal Agents; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Severity of Illness Index; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Corticosteroids are first-line therapy for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Although corticosteroids may improve symptoms, they have significant adverse effects. Steroids which act topically, with less systemic side-effects may be more desirable. Budesonide is a topically acting corticosteroid with extensive first pass hepatic metabolism. There are currently three formulations of budesonide: two standard formulations including a controlled-ileal release capsule and a pH-dependent capsule both designed to release the drug in the distal small intestine and right colon; and the newer Budesonide-MMX® capsule designed to release the drug throughout the entire colon.. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral budesonide for the induction of remission in ulcerative colitis.. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane IBD Group Specialised Register from inception to April 2015. We also searched reference lists of articles, conference proceedings and ClinicalTrials.gov.. Randomised controlled trials comparing oral budesonide to placebo or another active therapy for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis were considered eligible. There were no exclusions based on patient age or the type, dose, duration or formulation of budesonide therapy.. Two independent investigators reviewed studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed study quality. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE criteria. The primary outcome was induction of remission (as defined by the primary studies) at week eight. Secondary outcomes included clinical, endoscopic and histologic improvement, adverse events and early withdrawal. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each dichotomous outcome and the mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% CI for each continuous outcome. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.. Six studies (1808 participants) were included. Four studies compared budesonide-MMX® with placebo, one small pilot study looked at clinical remission at week four, and was subsequently followed by three large, studies that assessed combined clinical and endoscopic remission at week eight. Although two placebo-controlled studies had mesalamine and Entocort (standard budesonide) treatment arms, these studies were not sufficiently powered to compare Budesonide-MMX® with these active comparators. One small study compared standard budesonide with prednisolone and one study compared standard budesonide to mesalamine. Four studies were rated as low risk of bias and two studies had an unclear risk of bias. A pooled analysis of three studies (900 participants) showed that budesonide-MMX® 9 mg was significantly superior to placebo for inducing remission (combined clinical and endoscopic remission) at 8 weeks. Fifteen per cent (71/462) of budesonide-MMX® 9 mg patients achieved remission compared to 7% (30/438) of placebo patients (RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.50 to 3.39). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was moderate due to sparse data (101 events). A subgroup analysis by concurrent mesalamine use suggests higher efficacy in the 442 patients who were not considered to be mesalamine-refractory (RR 2.89, 95% CI 1.59 to 5.25). A subgroup analysis by disease location suggests budesonide is most effective in patients with left-sided disease (RR 2.98, 95% CI 1.56 to 5.67; 289 patients). A small pilot study reported no statistically significant difference in endoscopic remission between budesonide and prednisolone (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.23 to 2.42; 72 patients). GRADE indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was very low due to unclear risk of bias and very sparse data (10 events). Standard oral budesonide was significantly less likely to induce clinical remission than oral mesalamine after 8 weeks of therapy (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.91; 1 study, 343 patients). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was moderate due to sparse data (161 events). Another study found no difference in remission rates between budesonide-MMX® 9 mg and mesalamine (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.71; 247 patients). GRADE indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was low due to very sparse data (37 events). One study found no difference in r. Moderate quality evidence to supports the use of oral budesonide-MMX® at a 9 mg daily dose for induction of remission in active ulcerative colitis, particularly in patients with left-sided colitis. Budesonide-MMX® 9 mg daily is effective for induction of remission in the presence or absence of concurrent 5-ASA therapy. Further, budesonide-MMX® appears to be safe, and does not lead to significant impairment of adrenocorticoid function compared to placebo. Moderate quality evidence from a single study suggests that mesalamine may be superior to standard budesonide for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. Low quality evidence from one study found no difference in remission rates between budesonide MMX® and mesalamine. Very low quality evidence from one small study showed no difference in endoscopic remission rates between standard budesonide and prednisolone. Low quality evidence from one study showed no difference in remission rates between budesonide-MMX® and standard budesonide. Adequately powered studies are needed to allow conclusions regarding the comparative efficacy and safety of budesonide versus prednisolone, budesonide-MMX® versus standard budesonide and budesonide versus mesalamine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Induction Chemotherapy; Mesalamine; Prednisone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Although multiple innovative treatments of inflammatory bowel disease have become available, research continues to refine the value of existing drug therapies for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. What can Cochrane reviews tell us about evolving applications for traditional agents in inflammatory bowel disease? A Cochrane Collaboration symposium held at the 2014 Digestive Diseases Week annual meeting addressed this question. This article reviews the data presented at that session.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Azathioprine; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Congresses as Topic; Crohn Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Mesalamine; Methotrexate; Review Literature as Topic; Secondary Prevention

Pouchitis occurs in approximately 50% of patients following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis.. The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies (including antibiotics, probiotics, and other agents) for prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis.. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 2014.. Randomized controlled trials of prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis in adults who underwent IPAA for ulcerative colitis were considered for inclusion.. Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed study quality. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE criteria. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with clinical improvement or remission of pouchitis in patients with acute or chronic pouchitis, or the proportion of patients with no episodes of pouchitis after IPAA. The proportion of patients who developed at least one adverse event was a secondary outcome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each dichotomous outcome.. Thirteen studies (517 participants) were included in the review. Four studies assessed treatment of acute pouchitis. One study (16 participants) compared ciprofloxacin and metronidazole; another (26 participants) compared metronidazole to budesonide enemas; another (18 participants) compared rifaximin to placebo; and the fourth study (20 participants) compared Lactobacillus GG to placebo. Four studies assessed treatment of chronic pouchitis. One study (19 participants) compared glutamine to butyrate suppositories; another (40 participants) compared bismuth enemas to placebo; and two studies (76 participants) compared VSL#3 to placebo. Five studies assessed prevention of pouchitis. One study (40 participants) compared VSL#3 to placebo; another (28 participants) compared VLS#3 to no treatment; one study (184 participants) compared allopurinol to placebo; another (12 participants) compared the probiotic Bifidobacterium longum to placebo; and one study (38 participants) compared tinidazole to placebo. Three studies were judged to be of high quality. Two studies were judged to be low quality and the quality of the other studies was unclear. Treatment of acute pouchitis: The results of one small study (16 participants) suggest that ciprofloxacin may be more effective than metronidazole for the treatment of acute pouchitis. One hundred per cent (7/7) of ciprofloxacin patients achieved remission at two weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole patients. A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was very low due to high risk of bias (no blinding) and very sparse data (10 events). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had at least one adverse event (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.98). Adverse events included vomiting, dysgeusia or transient peripheral neuropathy. There were no differences between metronidazole and budesonide enemas in terms of clinical remission, clinical improvement or adverse events. Adverse events included anorexia, nausea, headache, asthenia, metallic taste, vomiting, paraesthesia, and depression. There were no differences between rifaximin and placebo in terms of clinical remission, clinical improvement, or adverse events. Adverse events included diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, proctalgia, vomiting, thirst, candida, upper respiratory tract infection, increased hepatic enzyme, and cluster headache. There was no difference in clinical improvement between Lactobacillus GG and place. For acute pouchitis, very low quality evidence suggests that ciprofloxacin may be more effective than metronidazole. For chronic pouchitis, low quality evidence suggests that VSL#3 may be more effective than placebo for maintenance of remission. For the prevention of pouchitis, low quality evidence suggests that VSL#3 may be more effective than placebo. Well designed, adequately powered studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.

Topics: Adult; Budesonide; Ciprofloxacin; Colitis, Ulcerative; Enema; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Metronidazole; Postoperative Complications; Pouchitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Rifamycins; Rifaximin; Suppositories

Budesonide , a synthetic, non-halogenated corticosteroid, has been introduced in the topical treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Budesonide MMX, a novel, once-daily oral formulation of budesonide that uses a multi-matrix system (MMX) technology to extend the release of budesonide throughout the colon proved to be effective for the treatment of active UC. The focus of this review is the current status of budesonide MMX in extensive and left-sided UC.. This paper covers the recent studies of budesonide MMX to describe its efficacy and safety in the treatment of mild-to-moderately active left-sided UC. A literature search and review of budesonide MMX were carried out using the PubMed database up to August 2013.. Clinical studies of budesonide MMX in adults with mild-to-moderately active UC demonstrated its efficacy and tolerability in achieving clinical and endoscopic remission. Although one trial is still ongoing, budesonide MMX 9 mg tablets represented the first orally administered topical corticosteroid formulation targeting the entire colon for the management of patients with active, mild-to-moderate UC.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans

Traditional corticosteroids represent a well-established and effective treatment for active ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the severity of their systemic side effects, led in recent years to look for new steroid molecules that could reduce them, maximizing the anti-inflammatory activity. Budesonide has been one of the most studied steroid compounds and it has been approved for the treatment of mild to moderate active Crohn's disease (CD). In order to extend the release until the distally located inflammation, budesonide has been coupled with a controlled delivery system, called Multi-Matrix system (MMX), already successfully tested with oral mesalazine for the treatment of distal UC. After in vitro and in vivo models, the efficacy of Budesonide-MMX has been investigated in active UC with a first small phase II study, and partially encouraging results. This article will review the evidences on the use of budesonide in inflammatory bowel diseases and will discuss the role of Budesonide-MMX in active UC nowadays.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

5-Aminosalicylates (5-ASA) are first-line treatment for mild-moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC). When 5-ASAs fail, systemic corticosteroids have been the standard next step. Due to the significant side effect profile of systemic corticosteroids, alternative options in the treatment algorithm after 5-ASA failures are needed. Budesonide-Multi-Matrix System (MMX) is a novel oral formulation of budesonide that uses colonic release MMX technology to extend release of the drug to the colon. Now that budesonide-MMX has been approved for use in some countries, and pending in others we need to understand its position in the treatment algorithm for UC.. To review the available literature for budesonide-MMX and incorporate it into the treatment algorithm for mild-moderate UC.. The available efficacy and safety literature regarding budesonide-MMX was reviewed, and compared to 5-ASAs and systemic corticosteroids.. In two large studies referred to as CORE (Colonic Release Budesonide trial), budesonide-MMX 9 mg daily was significantly more effective in achieving a combined end point of clinical and endoscopic remission than placebo in patients with mild-moderately active UC. Safety data are reassuring, with no clinically relevant differences between budesonide-MMX and placebo, including steroid-related side effects.. Budesonide-MMX 9 mg daily is an effective and safe treatment for induction in patients with mild-moderately active UC. At the current time, it should be considered in patients after 5-ASA failure and before systemic corticosteroids. Data are still needed to understand its role and dose beyond 8 weeks, and if it should be considered first line before 5-ASAs.

Topics: Algorithms; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Colitis, Ulcerative; Delayed-Action Preparations; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Mesalamine; Severity of Illness Index

IBD is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory disorder of the gut that demands long-lasting treatment targeting both flare-up periods and maintenance of remission. Oral systemic steroids have been used to induce remission in patients with active IBD for over 50 years due to their potent anti-inflammatory effects. The efficacy of systemic steroids in this setting has been largely demonstrated. However, the wide range of adverse events associated with these drugs has prompted the development of equally effective but less toxic steroid compounds. Currently, topically acting oral steroids are an important therapeutic option for Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and microscopic colitis, being oral budesonide and oral beclomethasone established elements of the IBD armamentarium. At present, oral budesonide is the first-line therapy to induce remission in microscopic colitis and mild to moderate ileocaecal CD patients and oral beclomethasone is effective treating mild to moderate UC patients with left-sided or extensive disease. This review aims at evaluating the current role of these compounds in IBD clinical practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Beclomethasone; Budesonide; Colitis, Microscopic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Humans; Induction Chemotherapy; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Maintenance Chemotherapy

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are inflammatory bowel diseases characterised by a chronic relapsing course. Corticosteroids represent the mainstay of medical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease for the induction of remission. Despite the high efficacy of systemic steroids, their use is limited by the high incidence of potentially serious adverse effects. The topically acting steroids are synthetic compounds characterised by high anti-inflammatory activity and low systemic effects by virtue of efficient first-pass hepatic inactivation. Budesonide and Beclomethasone Dipropionate are the two most studied topically acting steroids in inflammatory bowel disease. Oral Budesonide has been extensively studied in the treatment of mild to moderate ileo-caecal Crohn's disease but few data are available concerning oral Beclomethasone Dipropionate. This review focuses on the available evidence of efficacy and safety of oral Beclomethasone Dipropionate in the management of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and a possible role of this steroid in clinical practice is suggested.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Beclomethasone; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Glucocorticoids; Humans

Due to misunderstandings about their effectiveness and feasibility, topical (or rectal) therapies with aminosalicylates (5-aminosalicylic acid, 5-ASA) and steroids are often underused in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, many of these patients could be treated solely with rectal/topical therapies, or could benefit from them in combination with oral therapies. We review the evidence for topical therapies containing 5-ASA and budesonide in UC and discuss how these therapies can be optimized in daily practice, thereby improving compliance. Finally, we provide a brief summary of studies on the use of other topical treatments in UC, the results of which were both promising and negative.

Topics: Administration, Rectal; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enema; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Induction Chemotherapy; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Mesalamine; Patient Compliance; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Suppositories

Topical therapy with mesalazine and/or corticosteroids is the standard treatment for patients with distal ulcerative colitis. Rectal mesalazine is more effective than rectal systemically active corticosteroids or topically active corticosteroids like budesonide. In patients with mild to moderately active distal ulcerative colitis, topical mesalazine is therefore the treatment of choice. Doses of 1 g or higher are equally effective. The period of treatment is important (4 weeks are more effective than 2 weeks). In the case of nonresponse or nontolerability of rectal mesalazine, rectal budesonide is indicated. The standard dose of budesonide is 2 mg/day. This does not usually induce any corticosteroid-associated adverse events. Treatment with rectal mesalazine plus rectal topically active corticosteroids is even more effective than treatment with either substance alone. To overcome adherence problems with rectal therapy, rectal foam preparations have been developed which are usually better tolerated than enemas.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Mesalamine; Rectum

The use of glucocorticosteroids to treat both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is widespread, but no systematic review and meta-analysis has examined the issue of efficacy of these agents in its entirety.. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched (through December 2010). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting adults with active or quiescent CD comparing standard glucocorticosteroids or budesonide with placebo or each other, or comparing standard glucocorticosteroids with placebo in active UC, were eligible. Dichotomous data were extracted to obtain relative risk (RR) of failure to achieve remission in active disease, and RR of relapse of activity in quiescent disease, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Adverse events data were extracted where reported.. The search identified 3,061 citations, and 20 trials were eligible. Only one trial was at low risk of bias. Standard glucocorticosteroids were superior to placebo for UC remission (RR of no remission=0.65; 95% CI 0.45-0.93). Both trials of standard glucocorticosteroids in CD remission reported a statistically significant effect, but because of heterogeneity between studies, the overall effect was not significant (RR=0.46; 95% CI 0.17-1.28). Budesonide was superior to placebo for CD remission (RR=0.73; 95% CI 0.63-0.84), but not in preventing CD relapse (RR=0.93; 95% CI 0.83-1.04). Standard glucocorticosteroids were superior to budesonide for CD remission (RR=0.82; 95% CI 0.68-0.98), but glucocorticosteroid-related adverse events were commoner (RR=1.64; 95% CI 1.34-2.00).. Standard glucocorticosteroids are probably effective in inducing remission in UC, and may be of benefit in CD. Budesonide induces remission in active CD, but is less effective than standard glucocorticosteroids, and is of no benefit in preventing CD relapse.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Risk; Secondary Prevention; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

Corticosteroids remain one of the most popular medication choices for the induction of remission in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. While corticosteroids may improve symptoms, they do not always result in mucosal healing and have significant adverse effects. Steroids which act topically, with less systemic side-effects may be more desirable. Oral budesonide, a topically acting corticosteroid with extensive first pass hepatic metabolism, is effective in Crohn's disease and in enema formulation for left-sided ulcerative colitis. Data are limited regarding the role of oral budesonide in ulcerative colitis.. To systematically review the safety and efficacy of oral budesonide for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis.. Electronic searching of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed. Two authors independently reviewed all identified titles and abstracts. Full text articles of all potentially relevant studies were retrieved. Reference lists of review articles were searched in an attempt to identify additional studies. Abstracts of the major gastroenterology scientific meetings, held over the past 3 years, were hand searched. The ClinicalTrials.gov website as well as the Cochrane Registry of Controlled Trials was searched to identify any ongoing trials. Direct communication with pharmaceutical manufacturers was established to identify any ongoing or unpublished studies.. Randomized controlled trials of oral budesonide for the induction of remission in ulcerative colitis, with either a parallel arm or cross-over design, were considered eligible for inclusion. There were no exclusions based on patient age or the type, dose or duration of budesonide therapy. The primary outcome was the induction of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis. Secondary outcomes included clinical, histologic and endoscopic improvement, endoscopic mucosal healing, change in disease activity index scores, adverse events and study withdrawals.. Studies were reviewed for eligibility, data were extracted and quality assessed by 2 independent investigators. It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis of the included studies due to significant heterogeneity, with each study comparing budesonide to a different control medication.. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. Oral budesonide was significantly less likely to induce clinical remission than oral mesalamine after 8 weeks of therapy (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.91). There was no significant benefit of oral budesonide in comparison to placebo for inducing clinical remission after 4 weeks of treatment (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.59 to 3.39). A small pilot study reported no statistically significant difference in endoscopic remission between budesonide and prednisolone (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.23 to 2.42). The study was small and not powered to evaluate the impact of budesonide on clinical remission. Suppression of plasma cortisol was significantly more common in prednisolone treated patients (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.33). Two multicenter studies are ongoing.. At present, there is no evidence to recommend the clinical use of oral budesonide for the induction of remission in active ulcerative colitis. Mesalamine is superior to budesonide for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Mesalamine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Azathioprine; Budesonide; Child; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colorectal Neoplasms; Crohn Disease; Enteral Nutrition; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Mesalamine; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Middle Aged; Prednisone; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Gastrointestinal Agents; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Infliximab; Mesalamine; Prednisolone

In this review, we examined studies published on oral and topical formulations of budesonide (Entocort and Budenofalk, in Spain: Entocord and Intestifalk) for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. This glycocorticosteroid has a potent local action and an important first-pass liver metabolism. It has proven successful over the last years as a controlled-release formulation. It obtained results similar to prednisolone, without the latter s significant suppression of plasma cortisol. Many publications exist on the effects of oral budesonide for the treatment of Crohn s disease (CD). These have led to the registration of this drug for the treatment of CD. Studies on oral formulations of budesonide for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) are scarce. After reviewing published evidence, we suggest the conduction of controlled trials for the treatment of UC to obtain evidence-based efficacy and safety results in order to benefit patients with this form of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aminosalicylic Acids; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Azathioprine; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonoscopy; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Crohn Disease; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Mercaptopurine; Methotrexate; Metronidazole; Pouchitis; Remission Induction; Tacrolimus; Time Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Ultrasonography

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are the most frequent inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) with a prevalence of approximately one out of 500. Cytokine research opened new and potent treatment options and thus stimulated clinical and basic research.However, the IBD still remain a challenge for patients and physicians,demanding close cooperation between gastroenterologists,radiologists and surgeons. The basic understanding of IBD,which is necessary for efficient diagnostic and therapeutic concepts is reviewed.. Based upon recent publications and our clinical experience we discuss aspects of etiology,pathogenesis,diagnostics,and therapy of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.. A genetically influenced, exaggerated and sustained immune response against the own gut flora seems to be one of the most important factors in the pathogenesis of IBD. Not less important are environmental influences. For instance, cigarette smoking had been judged to have some negative influence on the natural course of Crohn's disease.Now,however, recent studies show that smoking is even a significant independent risk factor in the pathogenesis of IBD. Since IBD and especially Crohn's disease can effect the whole body, detailed analysis of inflammatory organ involvement is necessary before therapy. For instance, the MRI enteroclysis technique adds a necessary diagnostic tool for the exploration of those parts of the small bowel that cannot been reached by routine endoscopy like the upper ileum and the lower jejunum. In terms of therapy, a change of paradigms can be observed: patients will no longer be treated only when symptoms arise, but will early be integrated into a therapeutic concept, which is determined by site and extent of the disease and adapted to the abilities and needs of the patient.Furthermore,immunosuppressive agents like azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine will establish as central concept in the medical treatment of IBD.. IBD-therapy should rather be adapted to the patient's individual inflammatory pattern than be oriented to schematic treatment rules. New endoscopic and radiologic techniques provide the necessary diagnostic tools.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Azathioprine; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonoscopy; Crohn Disease; Cyclosporins; Diagnosis, Differential; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Ileostomy; Immunosuppressive Agents; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Infliximab; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Methotrexate; Parenteral Nutrition; Prednisolone; Quality of Life; Time Factors; Ultrasonography

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease. The disease is diagnosed on the basis of clinical parameters and endoscopic-histologic evaluation. 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA, mesalamine) represents the first-line treatment of choice. For patients with distal and left-sided disease the use of rectal preparations is effective. Most patients respond to 5-ASA suppositories or to topic steroids such as budesonide suppositories or hydrocortisone foam. For patients with extended disease, oral medications are mandatory. In case of low- to moderate-grade inflammation, 5-ASA preparations should be implemented. In the case of severe disease treatment with steroids is required. Following induction of remission, prophylactic treatment with 5-ASA (1.5 g/d) should be maintained. For patients with frequent or severe relapses, immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine is indicated. In case of a fulminant course of disease, treatment with intravenous cyclosporine is required in patients who have not responded to high-dose intravenous steroids. When all conservative treatment options fail, proctocolectomy with construction of an ileoanal pouch should be performed. New therapeutic strategies such as infliximab and interferons are being evaluated in clinical trials. The long-term complications of ulcerative colitis include steroid-induced osteoporosis and anemia and should be treated adequately. Finally, the risk for development of colorectal cancer increases steadily with disease duration and dysplasia should be screened for by endoscopic surveillance programs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aminosalicylic Acids; Anemia; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antiviral Agents; Azathioprine; Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colectomy; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonic Pouches; Colonoscopy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Cyclosporins; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Immunosuppressive Agents; Infliximab; Injections, Intravenous; Interferons; Mercaptopurine; Mesalamine; Osteoporosis; Placebos; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Recurrence; Remission Induction; Risk Factors; Suppositories; Time Factors

Therapies for patients with ulcerative colitis have, until recently, been limited in scope and efficacy. New formulations of mesalamine and corticosteroids have challenged the older therapies with respect to both efficacy and safety. The application of 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine for steroid-refractory disease and maintenance of remission has resulted in studies of other candidate immunomodulatory agents. Biologic therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor, adhesion molecules, or other cytokines are under intense scrutiny as potential disease-altering agents that may even replace currently available products. Other approaches, including such wide-ranging products as heparin, nicotine, and probiotics, suggest that control of ulcerative colitis may require an individualized approach for each patient.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Cyclosporine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Infliximab; Interferons; Mesalamine; Treatment Outcome

Although new salicylates are now available for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, sulphasazaline still has an important therapeutic role. The role of salicylates in Crohn's disease is limited to the mild activity phase; further data are required to clarify its role in maintenance on remission. New steroids are a real alternative to traditional steroids in active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aspirin; Beclomethasone; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Prednisolone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Salicylates; Sulfasalazine

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Administration, Rectal; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Mesalamine; Recurrence

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Prednisolone

Inflammatory bowel diseases remain a significant chronic disease affecting children and adolescents. Although corticosteroids remain the standard form of therapy for many patients, an era of biological agents for therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases is upcoming with human trials using these agents now forthcoming. In addition, studies on maintenance of remission are beginning to address the selection of those patients most likely to benefit from aminosalicylate therapies, the risks of relapse from using cyclooxygenase inhibitors, the lack of benefit from lipoxygenase inhibitors, and possible future methodologies to examine the effectiveness of the immuno-suppressive agent 6-mercaptopurine. Further development of the hypothesis that new-onset disease may be different than longstanding disease can be appreciated with reports of cytokine analysis in new-onset inflammation and the high risk of progression of disease in new-onset ulcerative proctitis in children. With more reports on the role of intestinal epithelial cells in intestinal diseases, it is now clear that this cell layer is not a passive bystander with regard to the interactions between the luminal contents and immune system components found within the lamina propria; new studies suggest that novel therapeutic strategies may be possible. This review summarizes recently reported aspects of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, with an emphasis on issues-pertinent for younger patients.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Chemokine CXCL5; Chemokines, CXC; Chemotaxis, Leukocyte; Child; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Humans; Interleukin-10; Interleukin-8; Nutritional Status

Clear strategies to optimise the use of corticosteroids in ulcerative colitis are lacking.. A meta-analysis was undertaken to examine critically the role of rectal corticosteroids in the management of active distal ulcerative colitis.. All reported randomised controlled trials were retrieved by searching the Medline and EMBASE databases and the bibliographies of relevant studies. Trials which met inclusion criteria were assessed for scientific rigour. Data were extracted by two independent observers according to predetermined criteria.. Of 83 trials retrieved, 33 met inclusion criteria. Pooled odds ratios (POR) showed conventional rectal corticosteroids and rectal budesonide to be clearly superior to placebo. In seven trials, rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) was significantly better than conventional rectal corticosteroids for inducing remission of symptoms, endoscopy, and histology with POR of 2.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72-3.41), 1.89 (95% CI 1.29-2.76), and 2.03 (95% CI 1.28-3.20), respectively. Rectal budesonide was of comparable efficacy to conventional corticosteroids but produced less endogenous cortisol suppression. Side effects, although inconsistently reported, were generally minor. A cost comparison of rectal preparations showed 5-ASA to be less expensive than corticosteroids.. Rectal 5-ASA is superior to rectal corticosteroids in the management of distal ulcerative colitis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Rectal; Aminosalicylic Acids; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Mesalamine; Pregnenediones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Suppositories

New therapeutic measures in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are either based on actual data on disease pathogenesis or on new pharmaceutic preparations of known drugs. An overshooting immune response with T cell activation in the local gut associated immune system seems to be central in the etiopathogenesis of IBD. Modulation of the antigenic load in the gut lumen by parenteral or enteral nutrition or antibiotic treatment can alter disease activity. Immunosuppressive drugs are able to decrease the overshooting immune response. Azathioprin has its clear value in chronic active steroid dependent disease courses of Crohn's disease. According to recent studies, Methotrexate seems to be active as well, however, more studies are necessary. Several studies were not able to prove that Cyclosporine is of value in the treatment of Crohn's disease. Newer preparations of aminosalicylates have shown effectiveness in both active disease and prolongation of remission in Crohn's disease in high doses. Local release formulations of steroids with high first-pass-effect as Budesonide will have their indication in subgroups of IBD patients. However, systemic steroid application is still the gold standard in active disease.

Topics: Aminosalicylic Acids; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunity, Mucosal; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lymphocyte Activation; Pregnenediones

Topics: Administration, Rectal; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Long-Term Care

The use of non-specific anti-inflammatory drugs such as the glucocorticoids is the foundation of medical therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Although conventional steroid drugs are highly effective, their use is associated with the adverse effects of Cushing's syndrome. However, the therapeutic index of these drugs can be improved by chemical modification of the steroid nucleus and the use of new drug delivery systems that target the bowel wall as the pharmacokinetic compartment of interest. Budesonide is a novel glucocorticoid compound that illustrates the potential of this approach to identify effective and safe new treatments. Regional therapy for inflammatory bowel disease is an important pharmacological concept for the future development of the new glucocorticoids and other classes of drugs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Drug Delivery Systems; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Intestinal Absorption; Secondary Prevention

Topical therapy within the treatment of intestinal diseases presents realistic formulation challenges for targeted drug delivery. Some relevant oral formulation concepts are reviewed. The basic principles employed are based mainly on differences in pH and metabolic activity between the different parts of the gastrointestinal tract. A successful example of targeted drug delivery within the treatment of Crohn's disease is presented. Topical therapy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis is also discussed. Physiological variations and influence of the disease and disease status present major challenges when deciding upon a suitable formulation principle.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Rectal; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Intestine, Large; Intestine, Small

Due to its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties glucocorticosteroids have proved to be highly efficacious in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, because of the risk of side-effects, the dose and duration of therapy with systemically acting glucocorticosteroids have to be restricted. Recently the use of topically acting glucocorticosteroids has attracted great interest. Among the various topically acting glucocorticosteroids budesonide has emerged as the most promising. Budesonide is highly potent, is readily water-soluble and has low systemic bioavailability, thus reducing the risk of corticosteroid-related side-effects. When given as enema to patients with proctitis or proctosigmoiditis, the efficacy of budesonide is greater than that of placebo and equal to that of prednisolone or 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas. In an enteric-coated formulation budesonide is more effective than placebo in achieving and maintaining remission in patients with ileocecal Crohn's disease. Although corticosteroid-related side-effects are rare, some suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis may occur.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Delayed-Action Preparations; Enema; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Pregnenediones

Systemic steroids have been used in gastrointestinal disorders, such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. However, glucocorticosteroids are associated with potentially serious adverse effects. For that reason there is a search for a steroid which would have rapid first-pass metabolism in the intestine and liver, low systemic bioavailability, high topical activity and rapid excretion. This review will consider the absorption, transport, metabolism, mechanisms of action, general effects and effects of steroids on the intestine, and the new steroids in particular.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biological Transport; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Glucocorticoids; Hepatitis; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Intestines; Pregnenediones

Topics: Administration, Topical; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Beclomethasone; Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Fluticasone; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Prednisolone; Pregnenediones

Inflammatory bowel disease remains a serious chronic illness in children. Recent developments in the care of these patients involves both basic science research into the pathophysiology of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and the development of refinements in the surgical techniques and medical therapies available as treatment options. In Crohn's disease, a new steroid analogue (budesonide) shows some promise as a possible medical treatment that would limit the devastating side effects of steroids in children. In addition, the bowel-sparing technique of strictureplasty has now been reported in children with good results. In ulcerative colitis, the surgical technique of endorectal pull-through continues to evolve with reports of the efficacy of specific pouch designs and surgical techniques. An understanding of pouchitis, the most common complication of endorectal pull-through, has focused on documenting specific alterations in the microbiology and physiology of the pouch, as well as investigating a possible link between autoantibodies and susceptibility to this complication.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Postoperative Complications; Pregnenediones; Proctocolectomy, Restorative

Budesonide is a glucocorticoid with high topical activity, but low systemic bio-availability which results in reduced systemic effects in comparison with other glucocorticoids. To date, it has been evaluated for use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease when administered either orally as a controlled ileal release formulation or rectally as an enema. In comparative trials, daily treatment with budesonide enema 2 mg/100ml for 4 weeks produced endoscopic remission or improvement in 46 to 84% of patients with active distal ulcerative colitis and/or proctitis and histological remission or improvement in 45 to 68%. In general, this regimen was effective as regimens of hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, prednisolone or mesalazine (5-amino-salicylic acid, mesalamine) enemas, but caused less suppression of plasma cortisol levels than the other glucocorticoids. Oral treatment with controlled release budesonide 9 mg/day for 8 weeks produces clinical remission in 42 to 67% of patients with active Crohn's disease of the ileum, ileocaecal region and/or ascending colon and significantly reduces Crohn's disease activity index scores compared with baseline and placebo. Results of a quality-of-life questionnaire reflected these clinical improvements. Budesonide has similar efficacy to prednisolone. Response to budesonide is maintained after dosage tapering at 8 weeks. Compared with placebo, maintenance treatment with oral budesonide 3 or 6 mg/day increases the duration of remission in patients with Crohn's disease, but does not appear to affect the 1-year relapse rate. Thus, budesonide, administered rectally to patients with distal ulcerative colitis or proctitis or orally to patients with Crohn's disease of the ileum, ileocaecal region and/or ascending colon, is a favourable option for the treatment of acute exacerbations of inflammatory bowel disease. Because of the low incidence of adverse glucocorticoid-related effects associated with oral budesonide, it may also be a useful agent for longer term maintenance therapy if further clinical trials confirm its efficacy in this indication.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Humans; Pregnenediones; Proctitis

Proctitis is the least extensive type of ulcerative colitis, for which rectal therapy is rarely studied and is underused. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and patient's preference of a novel formulation of budesonide suppository 4 mg, compared with a commercially available budesonide rectal foam 2 mg, for the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis.. This was a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either budesonide 4 mg suppository or budesonide 2 mg foam once daily for 8 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were changes from baseline to Week 8 in clinical symptoms, for which clinical remission was defined as having a modified Ulcerative Colitis-Disease Activity Index [UC-DAI] subscore for stool frequency of 0 or 1 and a subscore for rectal bleeding of 0, and mucosal healing, defined as having a modified UC-DAI subscore for mucosal appearance of 0 or 1. Using a more stringent criterion, we additionally analysed deepened mucosal healing, which was defined as a mucosal appearance subscore of 0. Patient's preference, physician's global assessment, and quality of life were also assessed and analysed.. Overall, 286 and 291 patients were included in the 4 mg suppository and 2 mg foam groups, respectively. Budesonide 4 mg suppository met the prespecified criterion for non-inferiority to the 2 mg foam in both co-primary endpoints of clinical remission and mucosal healing. Secondary endpoints consistently supported the non-inferiority of the suppository. Trends in favour of the suppository were observed in the subgroup of mesalazine non-responders. More patients reported a preference for the suppository over rectal foam.. In patients with ulcerative proctitis, budesonide 4 mg suppository was non-inferior to budesonide 2 mg foam in efficacy, and both were safe and well tolerated.

Topics: Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Mesalamine; Proctitis; Quality of Life; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome

In patients with mesalazine-refractory ulcerative colitis, systemic corticosteroids are the treatment of choice.. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prolonged release budesonide granules for the induction of remission in patients with mesalazine-refractory ulcerative colitis.. Patients with mesalazine-refractory ulcerative colitis discontinued mesalazine at baseline and received 9 mg prolonged release budesonide granules daily for 8 weeks in this open-label, phase IIa study, followed by a 2-week follow-up phase wherein patients continued treatment on alternate days (EudraCT number 2014-005635-14; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02550418). The primary endpoint was clinical remission (Clinical Activity Index ≤4; stool frequency <18 per week; absence of rectal bleeding) at Week 8. Secondary endpoints included clinical, endoscopic and histological measures of disease at Week 8. A post hoc analysis assessed histo-endoscopic mucosal healing. Treatment-emergent adverse events and morning cortisol levels were assessed throughout the treatment and follow-up phases.. A total of 61 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population; 50 were included in the follow-up analysis set. Clinical remission was achieved in 29 patients (47.5%; 95% confidence interval: 34.6-60.7%) by Week 8. Mean stool and bloody stool frequency decreased significantly from 32.5 to 22.9 per week (. Treatment with prolonged release budesonide granules for 8 weeks was associated with clinical, endoscopic and histological remission and demonstrated a favourable safety profile in patients with mesalazine-refractory ulcerative colitis. These results warrant further investigation into the potential of prolonged release budesonide granules as an alternative treatment for this patient population.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Colonoscopy; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance; Female; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Proof of Concept Study; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Although proctitis is the most limited form of ulcerative colitis, it causes unpleasant symptoms. Topical mesalamine, the standard treatment, is not always effective. We conducted a randomized phase 2 trial to determine the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of a budesonide suppository vs mesalamine suppositories vs combined budesonide and mesalamine suppositories for proctitis.. We performed a prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter trial in 337 patients with active proctitis to compare the efficacies of 4 different suppository treatments. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given 2 mg budesonide suppositories (2 mg BUS; n = 89 patients), 4 mg BUS (n = 79), 1 g mesalamine suppositories (1 g MES; n = 81), or the combination of 2 mg BUS and 1 g MES (n = 88). The study was performed from November 2013 through July 2015 at 36 study sites in Europe and Russia. The primary end point was the time to resolution of clinical symptoms, defined as the first of 3 consecutive days with a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and stool frequency.. The mean time to resolution of symptoms in the 4 mg BUS (29.8 days) and combination of 2 mg BUS and 1 g MES (29.3 days) groups resembled that of the standard 1 g MES treatment (29.2 days), but was significantly longer in the 2 mg BUS group (35.5 days). Furthermore, proportions of patients with deep, clinical, and endoscopic remission, as well as mucosal healing, were similar among the 1 g MES, 4 mg BUS, and combination therapy groups, but significantly lower in the group that received 2 mg BUS. No safety signals were observed, and the patients' treatment acceptance was high (67%-85% of patients).. In a multicenter randomized trial, we found that the efficacy and safety of 4 mg BUS in treatment of active proctitis did not differ significantly from those of 1 g MES. Budesonide suppositories offer an alternative therapy to mesalamine for topical treatment of proctitis. Clinicaltrialsregister.eu no: 2012-003362-41.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Europe; Female; Humans; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Proctitis; Prospective Studies; Russia; Suppositories; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Budesonide foam is effective in inducing clinical remission in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with active proctosigmoiditis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the duration of remission and predictors of relapse in UC patients who achieved clinical remission and mucosal healing by 6-week treatment with topical budesonide.. This is a retrospective, observational, multicenter study with a 2-year follow-up period. UC patients who were treated with budesonide foam in phase 2 or phase 3 clinical trials and achieved both clinical remission and mucosal healing were enrolled.. Among 84 patients who met the eligibility criteria, 60 participated in the study. Eighteen of the 60 patients (30.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.9-43.2) experienced no relapse (i.e., maintenance of remission) during the 2-year follow-up period. The median relapse-free survival time was 0.82 years (95% CI: 0.51-1.52). Of 37 patients with a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 after inducing remission with budesonide foam, 25 (67.6%) relapsed within 2 years. Patients with a disease duration of <1 year experienced a worse clinical outcome than patients with a disease duration of >5 years, and the hazard ratio was 2.38 (95% CI: 1.04-5.45).. This is the first study to evaluate the short- to middle-term prognosis in UC patients who achieved mucosal healing with topical preparations. After inducing remission by budesonide foam, treatment for maintaining remissions and strict follow-up may be needed for patients with shorter disease duration.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Endoscopy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Remission Induction; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Budesonide foam is used for the topical treatment of distal ulcerative colitis. This phase III study was performed to confirm mucosal healing and other therapeutic effects of twice-daily budesonide 2-mg foam in patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis including left-sided colitis and pancolitis.. This was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. A total of 126 patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis with active inflammation in the distal colon were randomized to two groups receiving twice-daily budesonide 2 mg/25 ml foam or placebo foam. The primary endpoint was the percentage of complete mucosal healing of distal lesions (endoscopic subscore of 0) at week 6. Some patients continued the treatment through week 12. Drug efficacy and safety were evaluated.. The percentages of both complete mucosal healing of distal lesions and clinical remission were significantly improved in the budesonide as compared with the placebo group (p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0035). Subgroup analysis showed similar efficacy of budesonide foam for complete mucosal healing of distal lesions and clinical remission regardless of disease type. The clinical remission percentage tended to be higher in patients achieving complete mucosal healing of distal lesions than in other patients. There were no safety concerns with budesonide foam.. This study confirmed for the first time complete mucosal healing with twice-daily budesonide 2-mg foam in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis with distal active inflammation. The results also indicated that complete mucosal healing of distal lesions by budesonide foam promotes clinical remission of ulcerative colitis. Clinical trial registration no.: Japic CTI-142704.

Topics: Administration, Rectal; Administration, Topical; Adult; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Male; Middle Aged; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing

Safety and efficacy of budesonide multimatrix, an oral extended-release second-generation corticosteroid designed for targeted delivery throughout the colon, were examined for induction of remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis refractory to baseline mesalamine therapy.. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial evaluated efficacy and safety of budesonide multimatrix for induction of remission [ulcerative colitis disease activity index score ≥ 4 and ≤ 10] in 510 adults randomised to once-daily oral budesonide multimatrix 9 mg or placebo for 8 weeks. Patients continued baseline treatment with oral mesalamine ≥ 2.4 g/day.. Combined clinical and endoscopic remission at Week 8 was achieved by 13.0% and 7.5% of patients receiving budesonide multimatrix [n = 230] or placebo [n = 228], respectively, in the modified intention-to-treat population [p = 0.049]. Clinical remission [ulcerative colitis disease activity index rectal bleeding and stool frequency subscale scores of 0] was similar in both groups [p = 0.70]. More patients receiving budesonide multimatrix vs placebo achieved endoscopic remission [ulcerative colitis disease activity index mucosal appearance subscale score of 0; 20.0% vs 12.3%; p = 0.02] and histological healing [27.0% vs 17.5%; p = 0.02]. Adverse event rates were similar [budesonide multimatrix, 31.8%; placebo, 27.1%]. Mean morning cortisol concentrations decreased at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 with budesonide multimatrix but remained within the normal range.. Budesonide multimatrix was safe and efficacious for inducing clinical and endoscopic remission for mild to moderate ulcerative colitis refractory to oral mesalamine therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonoscopy; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Remission Induction; Retreatment; Severity of Illness Index

Mucosal healing is an important therapeutic goal for ulcerative colitis. Once-daily administration of budesonide 2-mg foam is widely used for inducing clinical remission. No study has assessed the usefulness of twice-daily budesonide 2mg foam on mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis patients. We explored the efficacy for mucosal healing of once- or twice-daily budesonide foam in distal ulcerative colitis patients.. This study was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. In all, 165 patients with active, mild to moderate distal ulcerative colitis were randomised to three groups: once- or twice-daily budesonide 2mg/25ml foam, or placebo foam, for 6 weeks. Complete mucosal healing [endoscopic subscore = 0] and the safety profile were assessed at Week 6. Prespecified and post hoc analyses were used.. The percentages of complete mucosal healing in the twice-daily budesonide foam group were 46.4% compared with 23.6% in the once-daily group [p = 0.0097], or 5.6% in the placebo group [p < 0.0001]. The percentages of clinical remission and the percentages of endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 in the twice-daily budesonide foam group were 48.2% and 76.8%, compared with 50.9% and 69.1% in the once-daily group [no difference], or 20.4% and 46.3% in the placebo group [p = 0.0029 and p = 0.0007], respectively. In the subgroup of patients with previous use of a 5-aminosalicylic acid suppository or enema, there was a greater percentage of complete mucosal healing in the twice-daily budesonide foam group [32.0%] compared with that in the once-daily [8.7%, p = 0.0774] or placebo groups [4.8%, p = 0.0763], though there was no significant difference. No serious adverse event occurred.. A significantly greater percentage of patients receiving twice-daily administration of budesonide foam compared with once-daily administration/placebo achieved complete mucosal healing. This is the first study to evaluate the endoscopic efficacy of twice-daily administration of 6-week budesonide foam treatment for ulcerative colitis.

Topics: Administration, Rectal; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Colonoscopy; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Induction Chemotherapy; Intestinal Mucosa; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing; Young Adult

Rectal budesonide foam is a second-generation corticosteroid efficacious for active mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. This subgroup analysis examined the impact of baseline oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) on the efficacy and safety of budesonide foam in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis or ulcerative proctosigmoiditis.. Patients received budesonide foam 2 mg/25 mL twice daily for 2 weeks, then once daily for 4 weeks, or placebo, with or without continued stable dosing of baseline oral 5-ASAs, for remission induction at week 6 (primary endpoint) in 2 identically designed, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies.. Of the 267 and 279 patients randomized to treatment with budesonide foam or placebo (pooled population), 55.1% and 55.2%, respectively, reported baseline 5-ASA use. A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved remission with budesonide foam versus placebo, either with (42.2% versus 31.8%, respectively; P = 0.03) or without (40.0% versus 14.4%; P < 0.0001) baseline 5-ASA use at week 6. A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved a Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index rectal bleeding subscale score of 0 at week 6, regardless of baseline 5-ASA use (5-ASA, 50.3% versus 35.7%; P = 0.003: no 5-ASA, 45.8% versus 19.2%; P < 0.0001). The frequency of adverse events was comparable between groups, regardless of baseline 5-ASA use.. Budesonide foam was efficacious and safe for induction of remission of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis in patients receiving oral 5-ASA at baseline and those who were not (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01008410 and NCT01008423).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Rectal; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon, Sigmoid; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Proctitis; Proctocolitis; Remission Induction; Severity of Illness Index

Budesonide MMX is a novel oral formulation of budesonide that uses Multi-Matrix System (MMX) technology to extend release to the colon. This study compared the efficacy of budesonide MMX with placebo in patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC).. Patients were randomised 1:1:1:1 to receive budesonide MMX 9 mg or 6 mg, or Entocort EC 9 mg (budesonide controlled ileal-release capsules; reference arm) or placebo once daily for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was combined clinical and endoscopic remission, defined as UC Disease Activity Index score ≤1 with a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and stool frequency, no mucosal friability on colonoscopy, and a ≥1-point reduction in endoscopic index score from baseline.. 410 patients were evaluated for efficacy. Combined clinical and endoscopic remission rates with budesonide MMX 9 mg or 6 mg, Entocort EC and placebo were 17.4%, 8.3%, 12.6% and 4.5%, respectively. The difference between budesonide MMX 9 mg and placebo was significant (OR 4.49; 95% CI 1.47 to 13.72; p=0.0047). Budesonide MMX 9 mg was associated with numerically higher rates of clinical (42.2% vs 33.7%) and endoscopic improvement (42.2% vs 31.5%) versus placebo. The rate of histological healing (16.5% vs 6.7%; p=0.0361) and proportion of patients with symptom resolution (23.9% vs 11.2%; p=0.0220) were significantly higher for budesonide MMX 9 mg than placebo. Adverse event profiles were similar across groups.. Budesonide MMX 9 mg was safe and more effective than placebo at inducing combined clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with active, mild-to-moderate UC.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Induction Chemotherapy; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Budesonide is a corticosteroid with minimal systemic corticosteroid activity due to first-pass hepatic metabolism. Budesonide MMX® is a once-daily oral formulation of budesonide that extends budesonide release throughout the colon using multi-matrix system (MMX) technology.. We performed a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of budesonide MMX for induction of remission in 509 patients with active, mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients were randomly assigned to groups that were given budesonide MMX (9 mg or 6 mg), mesalamine (2.4 g, as reference), or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary end point was remission at week 8.. The rates of remission at week 8 among subjects given 9 mg or 6 mg budesonide MMX or mesalamine were 17.9%, 13.2%, and 12.1%, respectively, compared with 7.4% for placebo (P = .0143, P = .1393, and P = .2200). The rates of clinical improvement at week 8 among patients given 9 mg or 6 mg budesonide MMX or mesalamine were 33.3%, 30.6%, and 33.9%, respectively, compared with 24.8% for placebo (P = .1420, P = .3146, and P = .1189). The rates of endoscopic improvement at week 8 among subjects given 9 mg or 6 mg budesonide MMX or mesalamine were 41.5%, 35.5%, and 33.1%, respectively, compared with 33.1% for placebo. The rates of symptom resolution at week 8 among subjects given 9 mg or 6 mg budesonide MMX or mesalamine were 28.5%, 28.9%, and 25.0%, respectively, compared with 16.5% for placebo (P = .0258, P = .0214, and P = .1025). Adverse events occurred at similar frequencies among groups.. Budesonide MMX (9 mg) was safe and more effective than placebo in inducing remission in patients with active, mild to moderate UC.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Budesonide may be an effective therapy for mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to demonstrate non-inferiority for oral 9mg budesonide once daily (OD) versus 3g mesalazine granules OD.. This was an eight-week randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre study in which patients with mild-to-moderately active UC, defined as Clinical Activity Index (CAI) ≥6 and Endoscopic Index (EI) ≥4, received budesonide (Budenofalk® 3mg capsules×3) or mesalazine (Salofalk® 1000mg granules×3). The primary endpoint was clinical remission at week 8 (CAI ≤4 with stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores of "0").. 343 patients were randomised (177 budesonide, 166 mesalazine). Fewer patients achieved the primary endpoint with budesonide versus mesalazine (70/177 [39.5%] versus 91/166 [54.8%]) with a difference in proportions of -15.3% (95% CI [-25.7%, -4.8%]; p=0.520 for non-inferiority). The median time to first resolution of symptoms was 14.0 days (budesonide) and 11.0 days (mesalazine) (hazard ratio 1.19; 95% CI [0.94, 1.51]). Mucosal healing was observed in 54/177 (30.5%) budesonide patients versus 65/166 (39.2%) mesalazine patients, a difference of -8.6% (95% CI [-18.7%, 1.4%]; p=0.093). The incidences of adverse events (budesonide 26.6%, mesalazine 25.3%) and serious adverse events (budesonide 1.7%, mesalazine 1.2%) were similar.. Once-daily 3g mesalazine administered as granules is superior to 9mg budesonide OD administered as capsules for achieving remission in mild-to-moderately active UC. However, it is noteworthy that remission of UC was attained in about 40% of budesonide-treated patients with a rapid onset of resolution.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Chi-Square Distribution; Colitis, Ulcerative; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Remission Induction

Therapy for active left-sided ulcerative colitis usually involves topical application of mesalazine (mesalamine) or budesonide.. To compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide enema and mesalazine enema in the treatment of active left-sided ulcerative colitis.. A total of 237 patients with mild-moderate ulcerative colitis were randomized open 1:1 to receive either budesonide (n = 118) or mesalazine enemas (n = 119) for 8 weeks. Efficacy variables were clinical activity index, endoscopic, histological index and IBDQ scores after 4 and 8 weeks.. Clinical remission (intention-to-treat analysis) at week 4 was 63.5% for budesonide enemas and 77.2% for mesalazine enemas (P < 0.05). The respective values for the per protocol population (PP) were 59.9% examined in the budesonide group and 77.5% in the mesalazine group (P < 0.02). At the final visit (W8), clinical remission was diagnosed in the ITT analysis for 64.4% of the budesonide group and 77.4% of the mesalazine group (P < 0.05). The respective values for the PP analysis were 59.5% in the budesonide group and 75.3% in the mesalazine group (P < 0.02).. Compared with budesonide, mesalazine enema was associated with a significantly higher remission rate; this was supported by favourable trends in endoscopic, histological remission rates and the IBDQ score.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Enema; Female; Humans; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease with relapses. Many patients need systemic corticosteroids to induce clinical remission.. Efficacy and safety of Budesonide-MMX® 9 mg tablets, a new oral, extended-release formulation, were evaluated in patients suffering from active, left-sided UC with colitis activity index (CAI) <14.. 36 patients were treated once daily for 4 weeks with Budesonide-MMX® 9 mg tablets or placebo. In an additional 4-week period, all patients received Budesonide-MMX®. CAI, endoscopic index and histology were assessed after 4 and 8 weeks. Primary end-point was remission, and/or CAI reduction by 50% after 4 weeks. Morning cortisol was assayed after 4 and 8 weeks, and a short ACTH-test was performed at week 8.. 32 patients were analysed. After 4 weeks, 47.1% of the patients in the Budesonide-MMX® 9 mg tablets group achieved the primary end-point vs. 33.3% of patients on placebo. In addition, 47.1% of budesonide patients and another 33.3% of placebo recipients improved without remission by 4 weeks. The CAI reduction was significant with Budesonide (p<0.0001) tablets and not with placebo (p=0.1). Neither morning cortisol nor pituitary-adrenal axis was more frequently suppressed with Budesonide tablets than with placebo.. Budesonide-MMX® 9 mg tablets induced a fast and significant clinical improvement of active left-sided UC without suppression of adrenocortical functions and without important toxicity EudraCT number 2004-000896-33.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biomarkers; Biopsy; Budesonide; C-Reactive Protein; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonoscopy; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Remission Induction; Severity of Illness Index; Tablets, Enteric-Coated; Treatment Outcome

Pouchitis is the major long-term complication after ileal-pouch nal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Ten to 15% of patients develop a chronic pouchitis, either treatment responsive or treatment refractory.. To evaluate the efficacy of oral budesonide in inducing remission and improving quality of life in patients with chronic refractory pouchitis.. Twenty consecutive patients with active pouchitis, not responding after 1 month of antibiotic treatment were treated with budesonide controlled ileal release 9 mg/day for 8 weeks. Symptomatic, endoscopic and histological evaluations were undertaken before and after treatment according to Pouchitis Disease Activity Index. Remission was defined as a combination of Pouchitis Disease Activity Index clinical score of < or = 2, endoscopic score of < or = 1 and total Pouchitis Disease Activity Index score of < or = 4. The quality of life was assessed with the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire.. Fifteen of 20 patients (75%) achieved remission. The median total Pouchitis Disease Activity Index scores before and after therapy were, respectively, 14 (range 9-16) and 3 (range 2-10) (P < 0.001). The median Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score also significantly improved from 105 (range 77-175) to 180 (range 85-220) (P < 0.001).. Eight-week treatment with oral budesonide appears effective in inducing remission in patients with active pouchitis refractory to antibiotic treatment in this open-label study.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Budesonide; Chronic Disease; Colitis, Ulcerative; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Pouchitis; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

Rectal budesonide is an effective treatment of active ulcerative proctitis or proctosigmoiditis.. To compare the therapeutic efficacy, tolerability and safety, and patient's preference of budesonide foam vs. budesonide enema.. Patients with active ulcerative proctitis or proctosigmoiditis (clinical activity index > 4 and endoscopic index > or = 4) were eligible for this double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicentre study. They received 2 mg/25 mL budesonide foam and placebo enema (n = 265), or 2 mg/100 mL budesonide enema and placebo foam (n = 268) for 4 weeks. Primary endpoint was clinical remission (clinical activity index < or = 4) at the final/withdrawal visit (per protocol).. A total of 541 patients were randomized--533 were evaluable for intention-to-treat analysis and 449 for per protocol analysis. Clinical remission rates (per protocol) were 60% for budesonide foam and 66% for budesonide enema (P = 0.02362 for non-inferiority of foam vs. enema within a predefined non-inferiority margin of 15%). Both formulations were safe and no drug-related serious adverse events were observed. Because of better tolerability and easier application most patients preferred foam (84%).. Budesonide foam is as effective as budesonide enema in the treatment of active ulcerative proctitis or proctosigmoiditis. Both budesonide formulations are safe, and most patients prefer foam.

Topics: Administration, Rectal; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Double-Blind Method; Enema; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Proctitis; Proctocolitis; Treatment Outcome

Local treatment with foams in patients suffering from ulcerative proctitis or proctosigmoiditis is considered a rational treatment option.. To investigate colonic spread, safety, tolerability and acceptance of a newly developed budesonide foam formulation.. Twelve patients (four females, eight males) with acute proctosigmoiditis or left-sided ulcerative colitis were rectally administered a single dose of [99Tcm]-labelled budesonide foam (Budenofalk; Dr Falk Pharma GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) containing 2 mg budesonide in 20 mL foam after diagnostic colonoscopy. Thereafter, the colonic spread was assessed by means of gamma-scintigraphy for 6 h. Serum samples were taken simultaneously.. Budesonide foam spread with a maximum between 11 and 40 cm, thus reaching the sigmoid colon in all patients. In some patients, the foam even extended into the distal third and the middle of the descending colon with maximum radioactivity at 4 h. Systemic budesonide absorption was rapid and pharmacokinetic data were comparable with published data on marketed budesonide enemas, with mean serum C(max) and AUC(0-8 h) values of 0.8 +/- 0.5 ng/mL and 3.7 +/- 1.9 ng h/mL, respectively. The new formulation was well accepted by all patients, who could retain the foam for at least 4 h.. In the majority of patients, budesonide foam effectively spread up to the left-sided colon and thus qualifies for the local treatment of proctosigmoiditis.

Topics: Administration, Rectal; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Female; Gamma Cameras; Humans; Male; Proctocolitis; Prospective Studies; Radionuclide Imaging; Technetium

Budesonide, a topical corticosteroid, has proven useful for the management of Crohn's disease. Its efficacy is similar to prednisone but it has fewer side effects. A new pH-modified release capsule (Budenofalk) is probably efficacious in distal ulcerative colitis. The aim of the present study was to establish the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of two dosage regimens of budesonide capsules and to obtain efficacy information. Budenofalk 9 mg daily was administered as a single dose 9 mg in 8 patients and as three 3 mg doses in 7 patients with active distal ulcerative colitis for 8 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at three timepoints during the study: baseline, 4 and 8 weeks after start of treatment. Endoscopic evaluation and budesonide concentration in mucosal biopsy specimens was performed at 0 and 8 weeks. A pharmacokinetic profile and pharmacodynamic profile (cortisol, lymphocytes and neutrophils) was performed at day 5. In the 9 mg o.d. group, higher peak concentrations and systemic availability was found compared to the 3 mg t.i.d. group. Cortisol suppression was more pronounced after 9 mg o.d. than after 3 mg t.i.d. Lag-time, AUC and pharmacodynamic effects were comparable (14% mean decrease lymphocyte count and 26% mean increase neutrophil count). Mucosal biopsy specimens in the distal colon revealed significant budesonide levels with both regimens. After 8 weeks, 71% in the 9 mg o.d. group and 38% in the 3 t.i.d. group responded. The endoscopic index improved from 10 +/- 2 to 2 +/- 3 (p <0.001) with 9 mg o.d. and from 9 +/- 2 to 4 +/- 4.7 (p = 0.02) with 3 mg t.i.d. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles found in this study indicate that Budenofalk reaches the distal part of colon and rectum, but further studies to validate the budesonide assay in the mucosa and comparison with a control group are necessary. This limited study suggests that Budenofalk is effective in distal colitis and side effects are rare. Based on these observations a large clinical trial using 9 mg o.d. is indicated to confirm efficacy and assess further possible side effects.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Male; Middle Aged; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Rectal administration of corticosteroids is advocated in patients with proctosigmoiditis who have failed therapy with mesalamine enema. Foam offers patients better tolerability than an enema. In this study the efficacy and adverse effects of a new budesonide foam are compared with the presently available hydrocortisone foam.. Two hundred fifty-one patients with proctosigmoiditis were randomly assigned to receive either budesonide foam or hydrocortisone foam for eight weeks.. Remission rates were comparable in the budesonide and hydrocortisone groups, 53 and 52 percent, respectively. The mean disease activity index for the two groups decreased to a similar extent, from 7.2 +/- 1.9 and 7 +/- 2 to 3.6 +/- 3.1 and 3.9 +/- 3.4 in the budesonide and hydrocortisone groups, respectively. In a subgroup of patients who had not responded to rectal administration of mesalamine, 23 of 44 (52 percent) patients who received budesonide responded favorably to the foam, as compared with 14 of 38 (37 percent) patients who received hydrocortisone (P = not significant). Low plasma cortisol occurred in 3 percent of the budesonide group and in none of the hydrocortisone patients.. This trial demonstrates a similar efficacy and safety of the two foams in patients with proctosigmoiditis.

Topics: Administration, Rectal; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Dosage Forms; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Male; Middle Aged; Proctocolitis

Glucocorticosteroid enemas are equally effective as 5-ASA enemas in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis (UC). With the introduction of budesonide, the risk of systemic side effects may be reduced. We investigated whether budesonide enema, 2 mg/100 ml, administered twice daily (b.i.d.) could increase the remission rate in comparison with the once daily (o.d.) standard regimen. Furthermore, we evaluated whether 2 mg budesonide enema, given twice weekly, could have a relapse preventing effect.. 149 patients with active distal UC were treated in a controlled, double-blind multicentre study with two parallel groups: placebo enema in the morning and budesonide enema in the evening (i.e. 2 mg/day) or budesonide enema b.i.d. (i.e. 4 mg/day) until remission (absence of clinical symptoms and endoscopic healing) or at most 8 weeks. Patients in remission were randomized to either budesonide enema or placebo enema twice weekly for 24 weeks or until relapse.. The remission rates at 4 weeks were 33% for o.d. and 41% for b.i.d. regimens (NS) and correspondingly 51% and 54% at 8 weeks (NS). The b.i.d. group had an increased frequency of impaired adrenal function, 32% versus 4.8% (P = 0.001). The relapse rates during maintenance treatment with budesonide enema and placebo were 15% versus 24% after 8 weeks, 31% versus 27% after 16 weeks and 41% versus 51% after 24 weeks (NS).. Budesonide enema 2 mg o.d. appears to be the optimal dosage in active distal UC. We could not show that budesonide enema twice weekly is sufficient to maintain remission.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biopsy, Needle; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Enema; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proctitis; Recurrence; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

Budesonide is a locally acting steroid with a high first-pass metabolism in the liver and low systemic effects. We performed the first pilot study comparing budesonide foam (1 mg/50 ml b.i.d.) with mesalazine enemas (4 g/60 ml o.d.). 33 patients from 3 centres were enrolled in this open randomized clinical trial. 16 patients got budesonide foam and 17 got mesalazine enemas. The drugs were administered for 4 weeks. Histological index (HI) and endoscopic index (EI) were assessed at day 1 and day 28, clinical activity index (CAI) at day 1, 14 and 28. For patients with left-sided colitis and proctosigmoiditis improvement was defined as decrease in CAI of > or = 2 points. For patients with proctitis improvement was defined as decrease in HI of > or = 1 point. The primary efficacy evaluation was performed with the intention to treat population (n = 32). Improvement was found in 67% of the patients in the budesonide group compared to 71% in the mesalazine group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Adverse events were mild and rare in both groups. Both treatments had no significant influence on plasma cortisol. In this pilot study for distal ulcerative colitis budesonide foam is as safe and effective as mesalazine enema.

Topics: Administration, Rectal; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Enema; Female; Humans; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Proctoscopy; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Budesonide is a highly potent topical glucocorticosteroid that is characterized by low systemic availability as a result of high first-pass hepatic metabolism. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three doses of an enema preparation of budesonide in patients with active distal ulcerative colitis/proctitis.. In a double-blind multicenter trial, 233 patients were randomized to receive either a placebo enema or budesonide enema at a dose of 0.5 mg/100 mL, 2.0 mg/100 mL, or 8.0 mg/100 mL. The primary efficacy variables were an improvement of sigmoidoscopic inflammation grade, total histopathology score, and remission rates. Effects on cortisol concentrations were also assessed.. After 6 weeks of treatment, there was significant improvement in sigmoidoscopy and histopathology scores in the budesonide 2.0-mg and 8.0-mg dose groups compared with placebo. Remission was achieved in 19% of patients in the 2.0-mg budesonide group (P

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Enema; Female; Humans; Inflammation; Male; Proctitis; Sigmoidoscopy; Treatment Outcome

Budesonide, a corticosteroid with high topical anti-inflammatory activity and low systemic activity, has been shown to prolong time to relapse in Crohn's disease. In the present study, the efficacy of budesonide in an oral pH-modified-release formulation was evaluated for maintenance treatment in patients with steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis.. Fourteen patients with steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis in the reduction phase of conventional glucocorticosteroids (c-GCS) following a severe attack, were treated with budesonide 3 mg t.d.s. for 6 months. The primary investigation parameters were changes in the clinical activity index (CAI) and in the daily dose of c-GCS.. In 11 cases the CAI improved significantly and treatment with c-GCS could be terminated. Three patients experienced relapse and needed further c-GCS treatment. The average daily dose of c-GCS and the average value of the CAI before treatment with budesonide were significantly higher in the relapse group than in the remission group.. In patients with c-GCS-dependent ulcerative colitis, a dose of 9 mg budesonide daily in an oral pH-modified-release formulation was well tolerated, significantly decreased the CAI, and rendered c-GCS unnecessary in the majority of cases.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Chronic Disease; Colitis, Ulcerative; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Steroids; Substance-Related Disorders

Systemic glucocorticosteroids (GCSs) have proven efficacy in active ulcerative colitis but cause undesired systemic side effects. Therefore, new GCSs with high topical activity and a high rate of metabolism may be of clinical value in this condition. The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of the topically acting GCS budesonide in an oral controlled-release formulation in extensive or left-sided, mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis.. A 9-week, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was performed, and treatments with 10 mg budesonide or 40 mg prednisolone daily, both gradually tapered, were compared. Endoscopic improvement and effect on endogenous plasma cortisol were assessed.. Thirty-four patients were administered budesonide, and 38 patients were administered prednisolone. Mean endoscopic scores improved significantly in both groups but without difference between the groups. Five patients in the budesonide group and 7 patients in the prednisolone group deteriorated and were withdrawn from the study. Morning plasma cortisol levels were suppressed in the prednisolone group (entry, 449 nmol/L; 2 weeks, 116 nmol/L; 4 weeks, 195 nmol/L) but were unchanged in the budesonide group.. The GCS budesonide administered in an oral controlled-release formulation seems to give an overall treatment result in active ulcerative colitis approaching that of prednisolone but without suppression of plasma cortisol levels. This concept merits further evaluation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonoscopy; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prednisolone; Pregnenediones; Treatment Outcome

Budesonide-beta-D-glucuronide is a potentially useful orally administered prodrug for the treatment of colonic inflammatory bowel disease. Budesonide is a topically active glucocorticosteroid that exhibits low oral bioavailability (15%) in humans and laboratory animals. Oral delivery of budesonide to the inflamed tissues of the large intestine as its glucuronide prodrug should lead to locally high concentrations of active drug. Following liberation and absorption of the active drug, a large portion should be inactivated due to hepatic metabolism. Budesonide-beta-D-glucuronide was chemically stable in solutions at pHs of 1.5, 4.5, 6.5, and 7.4 at 37 degrees C. The enzymatic lability of the prodrug was assessed in luminal contents and mucosa obtained from conventional, germ-free, and colitic rats under in vitro conditions. There was a substantial change in glycosidase activity between the small intestine (proximal and distal portions) and the cecum in both conventional and colitic rat luminal contents. Luminal hydrolytic activity was low along the entire rat gastrointestinal tract of germ-free rats. Mucosal glycosidase activity was relatively low along the entire gastrointestinal tract of all three types of rats. The hydrolysis of prodrugs budesonide-beta-D-glucuronide and dexamethasone-beta-D-glucuronide in human fecal samples from patients with ulcerative colitis and normal volunteers was also measured. There were no statistically significant differences between the normal and colitic fecal samples for hydrolysis of the either prodrug or between the relative rates of hydrolysis of the two prodrugs. Hydrolysis rates of the prodrugs were about two orders of magnitude less in human fecal samples compared with those in cecal and colonic contents from the rat.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Chemical Phenomena; Chemistry, Physical; Colitis, Ulcerative; Dexamethasone; Feces; Germ-Free Life; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hydrolysis; Male; Pregnenediones; Prodrugs; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Solubility

Budesonide is a new corticosteroid with high topical anti-inflammatory activity but little systemic effect. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide enema (2 mg/100 mL) and 5-ASA enema (mesalazine 1 g/100 mL) given for 4 weeks in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis.. Ninety-seven patients were studied in a multicentre single-blind randomized group-comparative trial. The primary efficacy variables were endoscopy and histopathology scores obtained at 0, 2 and 4 weeks. Clinical symptoms were the secondary efficacy variables. Haematology, chemistry and adverse events were the safety variables.. Budesonide and 5-ASA enemas both resulted in a significant improvement in endoscopy and histopathology scores but no difference could be demonstrated between the two treatment groups. There was also a significant improvement of symptoms (number of bowel movements per day, quality of stools, presence of blood and mucus, and state of well-being) within both groups but no difference between the two treatment groups. The clinical remission rate at 4 weeks was, however, 38% for patients treated with budesonide enema but 60% for those treated with 5-ASA enema (P = 0.03). No adverse events attributed to the study drugs were recorded in either of the groups.. Budesonide enema 2 mg/100 mL appears to be as efficient and well-tolerated as 5-ASA enema in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aminosalicylic Acids; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonoscopy; Enema; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pregnenediones; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome

The retrograde spread of two budesonide enema formulations with different viscosities was investigated. The study design was open, randomized and two-period crossover. Three female and two male patients (age range: 35-45 years) with distal ulcerative colitis or proctitis participated. Both enema formulations contained a dose of 2 mg budesonide/100 mL. An unabsorbable radioactive marker (99mTc-labelled human serum albumin microcolloid) was added to the enema just before administration. All doses were given in the evening with the patients lying in a supine position during the whole investigation. The intestinal spread was followed for 8 h using scintigraphic imaging. Plasma samples for budesonide assay were taken during the 12 h after administration of the low viscosity enema.. Budesonide plasma levels were measurable for up to 4-6 h. Cmax was 2.5 nmol/L (range: 0.9-4.5 nmol/L) and was attained in 1.5 h (range 1-3 h). The patients had no difficulty in retaining the enemas. There was a statistically significant difference in spread between the low and high viscosity enema. The low viscosity enema spread over an area situated between the rectum and the splenic flexure. The spread occurred mainly in the first 15 min after administration. In contrast, the high viscosity enema, in most cases, spread only over a minor part of this area and the rate and extent of spreading was also more variable with this formulation.. The spread of a low viscosity enema appears to be well suited for the treatment of proctitis and distal colitis.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Enema; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pregnenediones; Proctitis; Radionuclide Imaging; Technetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin; Viscosity

Efficacy and safety of the topically acting glucocorticosteroid budesonide retention enema (2.3 mg/115 mL) were compared with prednisolone disodium phosphate enema (31.25 mg/125 mL) in patients with active distal ulcerative colitis. The study was a randomized, multicentre trial, with two parallel groups and single-blind to the investigator. One hundred patients with active ulcerative colitis, not reaching beyond the splenic flexure as determined by endoscopy, were treated for up to 8 weeks.. Forty-five patients were randomized to receive budesonide and 55 to prednisolone. Both treatment groups improved significantly in terms of endoscopic and histological scoring during the study, but there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Clinical remission, defined as no more than three daily bowel movements without blood and endoscopically non-inflamed mucosa, was achieved in 16% of the patients in the budesonide group after four weeks and in 24% in the prednisolone group (N.S.). After 8 weeks treatment the clinical remission rate in the groups had increased to 36% for budesonide and 47% for prednisolone (N.S.). Mean morning plasma cortisol levels were unchanged in the budesonide group, whereas they were significantly suppressed in the prednisolone group after 2, 4 and 8 weeks (P < 0.0001). Side effects were mild and rare in both groups.. Treatment with budesonide enema in active distal ulcerative colitis was comparable, regarding efficacy, to treatment with conventional prednisolone enema. A prolongation of the treatment time from 4 to 8 weeks doubled the clinical remission rate in both groups. However, budesonide may be preferable to prednisolone since it causes less systemic effects as reflected by a lack of plasma cortisol suppression.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Endoscopy; Enema; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Male; Middle Aged; Prednisolone; Pregnenediones; Remission Induction

Pharmacokinetic data obtained after one dose of a 2-mg budesonide enema were compared with data obtained after the last dose of four weeks of daily treatment in 24 patients with active distal ulcerative colitis or proctitis. This open multicentre study involved 28 eligible patients. Sigmoidoscopy and biopsy scores improved significantly (P < 0.002) during the four-week treatment period. Maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) of budesonide was 2.1 nmol/L 1.3 h after the first dose and 2.5 nmol/L 1.2 h after the last dose; the difference was not significant. The area under the curve (AUC) of plasma concentration vs. time was after the first dose 9.7 nmol h/L and after the last dose 11.6 nmol h/L (P < 0.03). The small increase in AUC may be attributed to improved absorption. During the last dose interval, minimal plasma concentration was below the limit of quantitation in most subjects. The Cmax and AUC of budesonide increased slightly after four weeks of treatment, but budesonide did not accumulate. Mean morning plasma cortisol values did not change significantly during treatment (P = 0.083), although a small change in cortisol levels between the first visit (pre-treatment) and last visit was positively correlated to the Cmax of budesonide measured at the last visit (P = 0.012).

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Double-Blind Method; Enema; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pregnenediones; Proctitis

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether budesonide enema (2 mg/100 ml) had a significantly better effect than placebo in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis or proctitis. The trial was of controlled, randomized, double-blind design and included 41 treated patients. The treatment time was 4 weeks, with revisits after 2 and 4 weeks. If no improvement was seen, the patient could be switched over to open-label therapy with budesonide enema. Sigmoidoscopy, histology, blood chemistry, and diary cards were used for estimating the effect of treatment. The results showed that budesonide was superior to placebo. Sigmoidoscopy and biopsy scores improved significantly (p less than 0.01) in budesonide-treated patients compared with placebo. Significantly more patients switched over to open budesonide treatment in the placebo group owing to lack of efficacy compared with budesonide (p less than 0.001). No drug-related adverse experiences occurred, and there was no decrease in endogenous morning plasma cortisol levels. It is concluded that budesonide enema appears to be an effective and safe treatment for distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biopsy; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Double-Blind Method; Drug Evaluation; Enema; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Male; Middle Aged; Pregnenediones; Proctitis; Sigmoidoscopy

The effect of budesonide, 1, 2, and 4 mg/100 ml in daily enemas, on active distal ulcerative colitis was compared with that of prednisolone disodium phosphate enemas, 25 mg/100 ml, in a multicentre, randomized, group-comparative trial. A total of 146 patients with active disease were treated for 2 weeks. Data from 139 were valid for statistical analyses. Bowel habits, proctoscopy findings, and histologic pictures were evaluated, and plasma cortisol was determined for measurement of influence on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Clinical symptoms and proctoscopy findings improved within all treatment groups. The improvement of these effect variables tended to be less after treatment with the lowest dose of budesonide, 1 mg/100 ml, than after the other treatments. Plasma cortisol did not change in any of the budesonide groups, whereas a mean reduction of 30% (P = 0.07) was observed after prednisolone. It can be concluded that budesonide enemas of 2 mg/100 ml constitute an attractive alternative to prednisolone enemas for topical treatment of distal ulcerative colitis.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enema; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Prednisolone; Pregnenediones

Sixty-four patients with active distal ulcerative colitis participated in a multicentre, randomized, investigator-blind trial to compare the effect of budesonide enema, 2 mg/100 ml, with prednisolone disodium phosphate enema, 31.25 mg/100 ml. Budesonide is a new potent corticosteroid with a rapid first-pass elimination. The patients were treated for 4 weeks, and the efficacy of the drugs were evaluated by sigmoidoscopy, histology, and subjective symptoms after 2 and 4 weeks. After 4 weeks of treatment 16 of 31 patients (52%) receiving budesonide enema had healed endoscopically, compared with 8 of 33 (24%) (p = 0.045) receiving prednisolone enema. Budesonide was superior to prednisolone in terms of both significantly improved sigmoidoscopic and histologic scores and subjective symptoms evaluated by visual analogue scales. The patients receiving prednisolone had a significant depression of endogenous cortisol levels during the treatment period, but not the patients receiving budesonide. Budesonide enema seems to be a promising therapy for active distal ulcerative colitis and causes no adverse reactions.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Double-Blind Method; Enema; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prednisolone; Pregnenediones; Random Allocation

Ulcerative colitis is a multifactorial disease of the gastrointestinal tract which is caused due to chronic inflammation in the colon; it usually starts from the lower end of the colon and may spread to other portions of the large intestine, if left unmanaged. Budesonide (BUD) is a synthetically available second-generation corticosteroidal drug with potent local anti-inflammatory activity. The pharmacokinetic properties, such as extensive first-pass metabolism and quite limited bioavailability, reduce its therapeutic efficacy. To overcome the limitations, nanosized micelles were developed in this study by conjugating stearic acid with caffeic acid to make an amphiphilic compound. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacological potential of BUD-loaded micelles in a mouse model of dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis. Micelles were formulated by the solvent evaporation method, and their physicochemical characterizations show their spherical shape under microscopic techniques like atomic force microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The in vitro release experiment shows sustained release behavior in physiological media. These micelles show cytocompatible behavior against hTERT-BJ cells up to 500 μg/mL dose, evidenced by more than 85% viable cells. BUD-loaded micelles successfully normalized the disease activity index and physical observation of colon length. The treatment with BUD-loaded micelles alleviates the colitis severity as analyzed in histopathology and efficiently, overcoming the disease severity via downregulation of various related cytokines (MPO, NO, and TNF-α) and inflammatory enzymes such as COX-2 and iNOS. Results of the study suggest that BUD-loaded nano-sized micelles effectively attenuate the disease conditions in colitis.

Topics: Animals; Budesonide; Colitis; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Disease Models, Animal; Inflammation; Mice; Micelles

Colon-targeted oral drug delivery systems (CDDSs) are desirable for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), which is a disease with high relapse and remission rates associated with immune system inflammation and dysregulation localized within the lining of the large bowel. However, the success of current available approaches used for colon-targeted therapy is limited. Budesonide (BUD) is a corticosteroid drug, and its rectal and oral formulations are used to treat UC, but the inconvenience of rectal administration and the systemic toxicity of oral administration restrict its long-term use. In this study, we designed and prepared colon-targeted solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) encapsulating BUD to treat UC by oral administration. A negatively charged surfactant (NaCS-C12) was synthesized to anchor cellulase-responsive layers consisting of polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs) formed by negatively charged NaCS and cationic chitosan onto the SLNs. The release rate and colon-specific release behavior of BUD could be easily modified by regulating the number of coated layers. We found that the two-layer BUD-loaded SLNs (SLN-BUD-2L) with a nanoscale particle size and negative zeta potential showed the designed colon-specific drug release profile in response to localized high cellulase activity. In addition, SLN-BUD-2L exhibited excellent anti-inflammatory activity in a dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis mouse model, suggesting its potential anti-UC applications.

Topics: Animals; Budesonide; Cellulases; Colitis; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Disease Models, Animal; Mice; Nanoparticles

A novel formulation for Ulcerative Colitis (UC) treatment by rectal administration with budesonide liposomes (Bud. Bud. In UC mice model, Bud. Novel Bud liposomes complex in thermosensitive Gel effectively mitigated symptoms, alleviated macroscopic and microscopic colon damage, and reduced inflammatory reaction in UC mice, which might be a potential strategy for UC treatment.

Topics: Animals; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Inflammation; Interleukin-10; Interleukin-6; Liposomes; Male; Mice; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are known to have a significantly poor quality of life due to bowel frequency (night) and urgent defecation. Budesonide foam is a topical medication that was approved in Japan in 2017 for the treatment of UC. However, its efficacy in the treatment of bowel frequency (night) or urgent defecation is unknown. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of budesonide foam for the alleviation of these symptoms.. UC patients who received budesonide foam between December 2017 and January 2020 at the Jikei University School of Medicine in Tokyo were enrolled. The simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI) was evaluated at the start of budesonide foam treatment and 2 and 6 weeks later in patients who initially scored ≥ 1 for bowel frequency (night) and urgent defecation, respectively. We also studied the effect of budesonide foam on remaining symptoms in patients who had used 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) topical treatment, those with SCCAI ≥ 3, and those in remission with residual symptoms (SCCAI 1 or 2).. Of the 233 enrolled patients, 102 were eligible for the study. In 36 patients with bowel frequency (night) treated with budesonide foam were significantly effective, score in SCCAI decreased from 1.17 ± 0.45 at baseline to 0.53 ± 0.61 at week 2 (p < 0.0001) and 0.17 ± 0.38 at week 6 (p < 0.0001). In 45 patients with urgent defecation score in SCCAI decreased significantly from 1.33 ± 0.52 at baseline to 0.44 ± 0.59 at week 2 (p < 0.0001) and 0.22 ± 0.40 at week 6 (p < 0.0001). Of 22 patients who switched from topical 5-ASA administration to budesonide foam, nine at week 2 (41%) and 11 (50%) at week 6 were improved with no symptoms, and there were no cases of worsened symptoms. No severe side effects associated with budesonide foam were observed.. Budesonide foam administration significantly improves both bowel frequency (night) and urgent defecation-related UC activity and is also effective for the patients who were refractory to topical 5-ASA administration.

Topics: Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Defecation; Humans; Mesalamine; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is commonly treated with corticosteroids and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs; however, medications have well-described adverse effects. Prior work suggests that anti-TNF therapy may reduce all-cause mortality compared with prolonged corticosteroid use among Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries with IBD.. To examine the association between use of anti-TNF or corticosteroids and all-cause mortality in a national cohort of veterans with IBD.. This cohort study used a well-established Veteran's Health Administration cohort of 2997 patients with IBD treated with prolonged corticosteroids (≥3000-mg prednisone equivalent and/or ≥600 mg of budesonide within a 12-month period) and/or new anti-TNF therapy from January 1, 2006, to October 1, 2015. Data were analyzed between July 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020.. Use of corticosteroids or anti-TNF.. The primary end point was all-cause mortality as defined by the Veterans Health Administration vital status file. Marginal structural modeling was used to compare associations between anti-TNF therapy or corticosteroid use and all-cause mortality.. A total of 2997 patients (2725 men [90.9%]; mean [SD] age, 50.0 [17.4] years) were included in the final analysis, 1734 (57.9%) with Crohn disease (CD) and 1263 (42.1%) with ulcerative colitis (UC). All-cause mortality was 8.5% (n = 256) over a mean (SD) of 3.9 (2.3) years' follow-up. At cohort entry, 1836 patients were new anti-TNF therapy users, and 1161 were prolonged corticosteroid users. Anti-TNF therapy use was associated with a lower likelihood of mortality for CD (odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.93) but not for UC (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.10-1.10). In a sensitivity analysis adjusting prolonged corticosteroid users to include patients receiving corticosteroids within 90 to 270 days after initiation of anti-TNF therapy, the OR for UC was statistically significant, at 0.33 (95% CI, 0.13-0.84), and the OR for CD was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.33-0.92).. This study suggests that anti-TNF therapy may be associated with reduced mortality compared with long-term corticosteroid use among veterans with CD, and potentially among those with UC.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Budesonide; Cause of Death; Cohort Studies; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prednisone; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; United States; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Veterans Health; Young Adult

The pathophysiology of the inflammatory bowel disease collagenous colitis (CC) is poorly described. Our aim was to use RNA sequencing of mucosal samples from patients with active CC, CC in remission, refractory CC, ulcerative colitis (UC), and control subjects to gain insight into CC pathophysiology, identify genetic signatures linked to CC, and uncover potentially druggable disease pathways.. We performed whole transcriptome sequencing of CC samples from patients before and during treatment with the corticosteroid drug budesonide, CC steroid-refractory patients, UC patients, and healthy control subjects (n = 9-13). Bulk mucosa and laser-captured microdissected intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) gene expression were analyzed by gene set enrichment and gene set variation analyses to identify significant pathways and cells, respectively, altered in CC. Leading genes and cells were validated using reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction or immunohistochemistry.. We identified an activation of the adaptive immune response to bacteria and viruses in active CC that could be mediated by dendritic cells. Moreover, IECs display hyperproliferation and increased antigen presentation in active CC. Further analysis revealed that genes related to the immune response (DUOX2, PLA2G2A, CXCL9), DNA transcription (CTR9), protein processing (JOSD1, URI1), and ion transport (SLC9A3) remained dysregulated even after budesonide-induced remission. Budesonide-refractory CC patients fail to restore normal gene expression, and displayed a transcriptomic profile close to UC.. Our study confirmed the implication of innate and adaptive immune responses in CC, governed by IECs and dendritic cells, respectively, and identified ongoing epithelial damage. Refractory CC could share pathomechanisms with UC.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Budesonide; Cell Proliferation; Colitis, Collagenous; Colitis, Ulcerative; Collagen; Enterocytes; Extracellular Matrix; Female; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Immunity; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Intestinal Mucosa; Male; Middle Aged; Stromal Cells; Transcription, Genetic; Young Adult

New formulations for topical treatment of ulcerative colitis with budesonide inclusion complex (BUD. This study evaluated the efficacy of such novel formulations in a rat model of colitis.. The PL-BUD. BUD. Novel budesonide inclusion complex formulations improved microscopic damage and reduced colonic MPO activity and TNF-α levels.

Topics: 2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin; Animals; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Combinations; Hydrogels; Male; Poloxamer; Rats; Rats, Wistar

Topics: 2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Gels; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Proctocolitis

Pouchitis treatment is a complex entity that requires a close medical and surgical relationship. The elective treatment for acute pouchitis is antibiotics. After a first episode of pouchitis it is recommended prophylaxis therapy with a probiotic mix, nevertheless it is not clear the use of this formulation for preventing a first episode of pouchitis after surgery. First-line treatment for chronic pouchitis is an antibiotic combination. The next step in treatment should be oral budesonide. Selected cases of severe, chronic refractory pouchitis may benefit from biologic agents, and anti-TNF α should be recommended as the first option, leaving the new biologicals for multi-refractory patients. Permanent ileostomy may be an option in severe refractory cases to medical treatment.

Topics: Acute Disease; Advisory Committees; Algorithms; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Biological Products; Budesonide; Chronic Disease; Ciprofloxacin; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Drug Resistance; Enema; Humans; Ileostomy; Immunosuppressive Agents; Metronidazole; Postoperative Complications; Pouchitis; Probiotics; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Secondary Prevention; Spain

Topics: Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Mesalamine

Budesonide-MMX has an established role in the management of relapsing mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Data regarding effectiveness and tolerability in real-life clinical practice are limited.. The aim of this study was to assess the use of budesonide-MMX in ulcerative colitis, as well as short-term effectiveness and tolerability in real-life practice.. We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis treated with budesonide-MMX at four tertiary inflammatory bowel disease centres in Italy from June 2016 to February 2018. Demographic and clinical features of patients, the use of budesonide-MMX, disease course and concomitant therapy were recorded. The primary outcome assessed was clinical remission at 2 months.. A total of 82 patients with active mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis were included in the study with a mean age of 45.9 years and a median partial Mayo Score of 4 (interquartile range 3-5). A total of 41 patients were male. Overall, 36 had extensive colitis, 38 left-sided colitis and eight proctitis. Treatments at the time of inclusion included 10 patients receiving biologic therapy, seven azathioprine and 54 mesalazine or salazopyrin. The main reasons for the addition of budesonide-MMX were clinical relapse (47.5%) or inadequate response to current therapy (39.0%). In total, 50% of patients achieved clinical remission, whereas 9.8% had clinical improvement. No response was noted in 40.2% of subjects. Using multivariate binary logistic regression, a moderate degree of activity was the main independent predictor of non-response. Eight significant adverse effects were reported in six patients with three discontinuing treatment.. In real-life clinical practice, budesonide-MMX is commonly used in combination with other therapies, both for acute disease flares and for partial response to therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Azathioprine; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Dosage Forms; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Italy; Logistic Models; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Sulfasalazine; Treatment Outcome

Cortiment®. This was a multicentre observational prospective cohort study conducted in Europe and Canada. Effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of Cortiment®. Data from 326 patients with mild-to-moderate UC were analysed for the primary endpoint. Clinical benefit was achieved in 60.1% (196/326) of patients at the end of Cortiment®. This was the first time that a large cohort study was conducted with Cortiment®

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Cohort Studies; Colitis, Ulcerative; Dosage Forms; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND In recent years, a plethora of therapeutic agents for ulcerative colitis (UC), especially novel biologics (Bio), have become available. Although it is now possible to use biological drugs, there should be no need for frequently changing medications. To avoid first-pass metabolism in the liver, thus reducing systemic bioavailability, budesonide foam has been applied as a topical steroid. We therefore evaluated whether budesonide foam has therapeutic value in UC patients who responded inadequately to Bio or to tacrolimus. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 10 patients who were experiencing an inadequate response to Bio (n=7) or to tacrolimus (n=3) at Juntendo University. We used Lichtiger's index to assess UC activity and clinical response. RESULTS Of the study patients, 4 were receiving adalimumab, 3 golimumab, and 3 tacrolimus. The average Lichtiger's index before budesonide administration was 7.1 (range 13-3), which improved to 3.4 (range 7-0) after budesonide therapy (p=0.01). Notably, 4 of the 6 cases with a Lichtiger's index >4 before budesonide administration achieved improvement of ≥3 points or remission. CONCLUSIONS Although the number of patients was small, budesonide foam had significant efficacy when added to the treatment of patients having an inadequate response to Bio or to tacrolimus. These results suggest that in cases responding poorly to Bio, adding budesonide foam as combination therapy can achieve a clinical remission.

Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Biological Therapy; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Remission Induction; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Tacrolimus; Treatment Outcome

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic inflammatory disorder. These guidelines indicate the preferred approach to the management of adults with UC and represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence for these guidelines was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) process. In instances where the evidence was not appropriate for GRADE, but there was consensus of significant clinical merit, "key concept" statements were developed using expert consensus. These guidelines are meant to be broadly applicable and should be viewed as the preferred, but not only, approach to clinical scenarios.

Topics: Adalimumab; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Biopsy; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonoscopy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Disease Management; Early Detection of Cancer; Gastroenterology; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Infliximab; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Mesalamine; Prognosis; Remission Induction; Severity of Illness Index; Societies, Medical; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Mesalazine suppositories are widely used to treat ulcerative colitis and have a guaranteed safety profile, but although rare, they can cause pulmonary toxicity. A 35-year-old woman with ulcerative colitis was diagnosed to have acute eosinophilic pneumonia after 29 days of oral mesalazine use and improved after mesalazine and corticosteroid were withdrawn. Reintroduction of mesalazine suppositories resulted in acute eosinophilic pneumonia recurrence after 28 days. Mesalazine re-administration (even via a different route) in patients with a history of mesalazine-induced eosinophilic pneumonia should be undertaken cautiously, because eosinophilic pneumonia may recurrence.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonoscopy; Female; Humans; Mesalamine; Methylprednisolone; Pneumonia; Probiotics; Pulmonary Eosinophilia; Recurrence; Thorax; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Pouchitis occurs in approximately 50% of patients following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for chronic ulcerative colitis (UC).. The primary objective was to determine the efficacy and safety of medical therapies for prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis.. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 25 July 2018. We also searched references, trials registers, and conference proceedings.. Randomized controlled trials of prevention or treatment of acute or chronic pouchitis in adults who underwent IPAA for UC were considered for inclusion.. Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE. The primary outcome was clinical improvement or remission in participants with acute or chronic pouchitis, or the proportion of participants with no episodes of pouchitis after IPAA. Adverse events (AEs) was a secondary outcome. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each dichotomous outcome.. Fifteen studies (547 participants) were included. Four studies assessed treatment of acute pouchitis. Five studies assessed treatment of chronic pouchitis. Six studies assessed prevention of pouchitis. Three studies were low risk of bias. Three studies were high risk of bias and the other studies were unclear.Acute pouchitis: All ciprofloxacin participants (7/7) achieved remission at two weeks compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.35, very low certainty evidence). No ciprofloxacin participants (0/7) had an AE compared to 33% (3/9) of metronidazole participants (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.98; very low certainty evidence). AEs included vomiting, dysgeusia or transient peripheral neuropathy. Forty-three per cent (6/14) of metronidazole participants achieved remission at 6 weeks compared to 50% (6/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.96, very low certainty evidence). Fifty per cent (7/14) of metronidazole participants improved clinically at 6 weeks compared to 58% (7/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.74, very low certainty evidence). Fifty-seven per cent (8/14) of metronidazole participants had an AE compared to 25% (3/12) of budesonide enema participants (RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.78 to 6.73, very low certainty evidence). AEs included anorexia, nausea, headache, asthenia, metallic taste, vomiting, paraesthesia, and depression. Twenty-five per cent (2/8) of rifaximin participants achieved remission at 4 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 6.11, 95% CI 0.33 to 111.71, very low certainty evidence). Thirty-eight per cent (3/8) of rifaximin participants improved clinically at 4 weeks compared to 30% (3/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.34 to 4.60, very low certainty evidence). Seventy-five per cent (6/8) of rifaximin participants had an AE compared to 50% (5/10) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.72 to 3.14, very low certainty evidence). AEs included diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, proctalgia, vomiting, thirst, candida, upper respiratory tract infection, increased hepatic enzyme, and cluster headache. Ten per cent (1/10) of Lactobacillus GG participants improved clinically at 12 weeks compared to 0% (0/10) of placebo participants (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.14 to 65.90, very low certainty evidence).Chronic pouchitis: Eighty-five per cent (34/40) of De Simone Formulation participants maintained remission at 9 to 12 months compared to 3% (1/36) of. At 12 months, 90% (18/20) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis compared to 60% (12/20) of placebo participants (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.21, low certainty evidence). Another study found 100% (16/16) of De Simone Formulation participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 12 months compared to 92% (11/12) of the no treatment control group (RR 1.10, 95% 0.89 to 1.36, very low certainty evidence). Eighty-six per cent (6/7) of Bifidobacterium longum participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 6 months compared to 60% (3/5) of placebo participants (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.11, very low certainty evidence). Eleven per cent (1/9) of Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI participants had no episodes of acute pouchitis at 24 months compared to 50% (4/8) of placebo participants (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.60, very low certainty evidence). Forty-six per cent (43/94) of allopurinol participants had no episodes of pouchitis at 24 months compared to 43% (39/90) of placebo participants (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.46; low certainty evidence). Eighty-one per cent (21/26) of tinidazole participants had no episodes of pouchitis over 12 months compared to 58% (7/12) of placebo participants (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.31, very low certainty evidence).. The effects of antibiotics, probiotics and other interventions for treating and preventing pouchitis are uncertain. Well designed, adequately powered studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for the treatment and prevention of pouchitis.

Topics: Anastomosis, Surgical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Budesonide; Ciprofloxacin; Colitis, Ulcerative; Enema; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Metronidazole; Postoperative Complications; Pouchitis; Probiotics; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction

Topics: Algorithms; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Inflammation

Topics: Algorithms; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Proctocolitis

Budesonide with multi-matrix technology (MMX) is an oral corticosteroid, shown to have high topical activity against ulcerative colitis (UC) while maintaining low systemic bioavailability with few adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of budesonide MMX versus commonly used corticosteroids, in the second-line treatment of active mild-to-moderate UC in the Netherlands.. An eight-state Markov model with an 8 week cycle length captured remission, four distinct therapy stages, hospitalization, possible colectomy and mortality. Remission probability for budesonide MMX was based on the CORE-II study. Population characteristics were derived from the Dutch Inflammatory Bowel Disease South Limburg cohort (n = 598) and included patients with proctitis (39%), left-sided (42%) and extensive disease (19%). Comparators (topical budesonide foam and enema, oral budesonide and prednisolone) were selected based on current Dutch clinical practice. Treatment effects were evaluated by network meta-analysis using a Bayesian framework. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed over a 5 year time horizon from a societal perspective, with costs, health-state and adverse event utilities derived from published sources. Outcomes were weighted by disease extent distribution and corresponding comparators.. Budesonide MMX was associated with comparable quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain versus foam and oral formulations (+0.01 QALYs) in the total UC population, whilst being cost-saving (EUR 366 per patient). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis evaluated an 86.6% probability of budesonide MMX being dominant (cost-saving with QALY gain) versus these comparators. Exploratory analysis showed similar findings versus prednisolone.. Differing definitions of trial end-points and remission across trials meant indirect comparison was not ideal. However, in the absence of head-to-head clinical data, these comparisons are reasonable alternatives and currently offer the only comparison of second-line UC treatments.. In the present analysis, budesonide MMX was shown to be cost-effective versus comparators in the total UC population, for the second-line treatment of active mild-to-moderate UC in the Netherlands.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Health Resources; Health Services; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Models, Econometric; Netherlands; Prednisolone; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Remission Induction; Severity of Illness Index

The aim of this study was to develop pH sensitive nanoparticles of budesonide for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.. The NPs system was characterized by the transmission electron microscopy (TEM), particle size, drug loading and encapsulation efficiency. In addition, in vitro drug release prop-erties and pharmacokinetics were also investigated in detail. The optimized formulation was examined for its in-vivo targeting potential using 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis in a rat model.. Dynamic light-scattering results showed that the particle size of budesonide-Eudragit S100/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles was around 110.5 nm, with a polydispersity index of 0.098. Transmission electron microscopy images showed that BUD-ES100/PLGA NPs were spherical with uniform size and relatively smooth surfaces. In vitro release showed that BUD-ES100/PLGA NPs required minimal release of drugs during its transit in the stomach and the upper small intestine to ensure that a maximum dose reached the colon. After the pharma-codynamic treatment, the myeloperoxidase value of BUD-ES100/PLGA NPs was close to the normal group. The histopathological examination of rectum showed that no sign of damages such as epithelial necrosis and sloughing epithelial cells was detected.. Our findings suggested that BUD-ES100/PLGA NPs were a promising alternative to single pH-dependent systems for colitis therapy.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Disease Models, Animal; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Mice; Mice, Inbred Strains; Nanoparticles; Trinitrobenzenesulfonic Acid

Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Central Serous Chorioretinopathy; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans; Male; Pouchitis; Tablets, Enteric-Coated

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Mesalamine; Risk Assessment

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Colitis, Ulcerative; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Male; Poland; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate how Italian gastroenterologists use corticosteroids in clinical practice for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).. All members of the Italian Group for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) were invited to fill in a web-based questionnaire.. 131/448 (29.2%) members completed the survey. In mild-to-moderate UC and CD relapses, low-bioavailability steroids (LBS) are first-line therapy for 37% and 42% of clinicians, respectively. In case of failure, immediate step-up to biologics or immunosuppressants is considered by 23% and 29%. Regarding conventional corticosteroids (CCS), a fixed starting dose is prescribed by 50%, and a weight-based dose by 22%. Tapering is started after 7-10days by 41% and after 14days by 32%. The preferred tapering schedule is 5mg/week. In case of CCS failure, 47% switch to parenteral steroids before considering shifting to different drug classes. In case of symptoms recurrence during tapering, 14% re-increase the dose and try tapering again. Before prescribing steroids, 72% do not prescribe any specific evaluation whereas during treatment some evaluation is performed by 85%. Vitamin D and calcium supplements are routinely prescribed along with steroids by 38%.. Several discrepancies and some deviation from the available guidelines were recorded among Italian gastroenterologists regarding corticosteroids use in IBD patients.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Beclomethasone; Biological Availability; Biological Products; Budesonide; Calcium; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Dietary Supplements; Drug Administration Schedule; Health Care Surveys; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Italy; Middle Aged; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prednisone; Recurrence; Severity of Illness Index; Vitamin D

Budesonide (BUD) is a glucocorticoid widely used for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. In this work, we propose the study of the system BUD-HP-β-CD inclusion complex incorporated into PL 407 and PL407-PL403 thermoreversible hydrogels, considering physico-chemical and pharmaceutical aspects. Complexation between BUD and HP-β-CD was confirmed by phase solubility studies (1:1 stoichiometry, Kc=8662.8 M(-1)), DSC, FTIR and microscopy analyzes. BUD solubility in simulated upper and lower colon fluids was improved in a dependence of HP-β-CD and PL 407 or PL407-PL403 association. Micellar hydrodynamic diameter studies showed the interaction between HP-β-CD and PL blocks, as well as the reorganization of the micellar system in the presence of BUD and its inclusion complex. Micellization temperature (Tm) was not shifted, but sol-gel phase transition studies showed that in the presence of BUD, HP-β-CD or BUD:HP-β-CD complex, the association PL407-PL403 favored the gel formation close to the physiological temperature. Physico-chemical and in vitro release assays studies revealed no competitive displacement of BUD from the HP-β-CD cavity evoked by PL407 or PL407-PL403 addition. These findings point out the BUD-HP-β-CD in PL-based hydrogels as strategies for future investigations on development of new pharmaceutical formulations for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Topics: 2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; beta-Cyclodextrins; Budesonide; Calorimetry, Differential Scanning; Chemical Phenomena; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Liberation; Humans; Hydrodynamics; Hydrogels; Micelles; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Phase Transition; Poloxamer; Solubility; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Temperature

Topics: Aged; Budesonide; Clostridioides difficile; Colitis, Microscopic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonoscopy; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous; Fecal Microbiota Transplantation; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male

Conventional oral corticosteroids are effective at reducing inflammation associated with ulcerative colitis (UC); however, systemic adverse effects limit their use. Budesonide MMX is an extended-release, second-generation corticosteroid that targets delivery of budesonide to the entire colon.. To analyse efficacy and safety outcomes from two phase 3 studies of budesonide MMX in patients with mild-to-moderate active UC.. Patients were assigned to budesonide MMX 9 mg, budesonide MMX 6 mg, or placebo once daily in two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week studies (CORE I and II). Pooled data were analysed for pre-defined primary (combined clinical and colonoscopic remission), secondary and exploratory endpoints. Primary endpoint data were analysed to evaluate the potential influence of demographical and baseline disease characteristics on remission.. Modified intent-to-treat population (histological evidence of baseline inflammation) had 232, 230 and 210 patients in budesonide MMX 9 mg, budesonide MMX 6 mg and placebo groups respectively. Combined clinical and colonoscopic remission rates were significantly greater than placebo (6.2%) for the budesonide MMX 9 mg group (17.7%; P = 0.0002), but not the budesonide MMX 6 mg group (10.9%). The primary endpoint of remission with budesonide MMX 9 mg was significantly greater than placebo in most subgroups analysed. Symptom resolution and colonoscopic improvement rates were significantly greater with budesonide MMX 9 mg vs. placebo. Budesonide MMX was safe and well tolerated.. This pooled analysis showed that budesonide MMX 9 mg is efficacious, safe and well tolerated for inducing remission of mild-to-moderate UC.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Budesonide; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonoscopy; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Socioeconomic Factors; Young Adult

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Administration, Rectal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Approval; Drug Therapy, Combination; Germany; Humans; Medication Adherence; Mesalamine

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Beclomethasone; Bone and Bones; Budesonide; Calcium Compounds; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Primary Health Care; Spain; Vitamin D; Vitamins

Topics: Administration, Rectal; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

The availability of new topical preparations for the treatment of left sided ulcerative colitis offers a therapy optimization for many patients. Rectal application of steroids and 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is associated with fewer side effects and has a higher therapeutic efficacy in left-sided colitis as compared to a systemic therapy. Therefore, we were interested in the use of topical therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis. The key question was whether topical treatment is more frequently used than oral therapy in patients with proctitis and left sided colitis. Data of 800 patients of the Swiss IBD cohort study were analyzed. Sixteen percent of patients of the cohort had proctitis, 21% proctosigmoiditis and 41% pancolitis. Topical therapy with 5-ASA or corticosteroids was given in 26% of patients with proctitis, a combined systemic and topical treatment was given in 13%, whereas systemic treatment with 5-ASA without topical treatment was given in 29%. Proportion of topical drug use decreased with respect to disease extension from 39% for proctitis to 13.1% for pancolitis (P=0.001). Patients with severe colitis received a significantly higher dose of topical 5-ASA than patients in remission. Side effects of topical or systemic 5-ASA or budesonide treatment were less frequently seen compared to other medications. Topical treatment was frequently stopped over time. The quality of life was the same in patients with limited disease compared to patients with pancolitis. Topical treatment in proctitis patients was underused in Switzerland. Since topical treatment is safe and effective it should be used to a larger extend.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Rectal; Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Enema; Female; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Proctitis; Severity of Illness Index; Switzerland; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Young Adult

The link between Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) and Crohn's disease (CD) is supported by several studies that have reported the detection and isolation of MAP from human tissues, but causation has not yet been proven. Preliminary studies have shown higher levels of antibodies in sera from CD patients against secreted protein from MAP within human macrophages when compared to healthy controls. The immunogenicity of this protein in CD patients under different treatment regimes was evaluated.. Sera of 110 CD patients, 82 ulcerative colitis (UC), and 150 healthy controls were collected and the presence of antibodies against the mycobacterial protein tyrosine phosphatase PtpA was assayed using ELISA.. A statistically significant difference in the level of antibodies against PtpA was measured in untreated CD patients versus healthy controls, but variation in the antibody levels was observed when patients were subjected to different treatment regimens. UC patients showed no differences in the levels of antibodies against PtpA when compared to healthy controls.. CD patients under different drug treatments show a clear difference in the levels of antibodies against a protein secreted by MAP, suggesting that if MAP is active in the progress of CD, some treatments can be detrimental to its survival.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Bacterial; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Azathioprine; Bacterial Proteins; Budesonide; Case-Control Studies; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Infliximab; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis; Prednisone; Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases; Young Adult

Budesonide is a corticosteroid characterized by high topical activity and low systemic effect associated with fewer glucocorticoid-related adverse events than conventional steroids. Differently from Crohn's disease, no evidence suggests that oral budesonide is effective for the induction of remission of ulcerative colitis (UC). Budesonide multi-matrix (MMX) system is a new oral preparation that, by employing a MMX, provides the release of the drug throughout the entire colon. Its efficacy in inducing UC remission, at a dose of 9 mg, is based on some recent trials. However, in two studies the absolute differences between budesonide MMX and placebo were much lower than the rate of success reported in previous trials with mesalazines. In addition, the therapeutic advantage of budesonide MMX 9 mg over 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) showed by one study, and the advantage of budesonide MMX over budesonide reported in the other study, was only 5.8 and 4.8%, respectively. The evidence supporting the use of budesonide MMX at a dose of 6 mg for maintenance is weak. Therefore, the effective dosage should be 9 mg also in maintenance, but not for > 4 - 6 months, because a prolonged treatment has showed to increase the rate of side effects.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Glucocorticoids; Humans

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Humans

Topics: Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Mesalamine; Phosphatidylcholines

Topics: Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Interactions; Glucocorticoids; Humans

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Female; Humans; Male

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Female; Humans; Male

Three layered pellets of budesonide were prepared for colon delivery by the extrusion-spheronization method. The coatings consisted of hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (HPMC) (as barrier layer), Eudragit E (as rate controlling layer) and hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose acetate succinate (HPMC AS) (as enteric layer). The rate controlling layer was further modified using various pore formers. Dissolution studies were carried out at pH 1.2, 7.4 and 6.8. Pellet core composition and type and level of pore former affected the drug release from pellets. Pellets containing 20% (m/m) citric acid in the cores coated with HPMC at a coating level of 6% (m/m), Eudragit E containing Avicel RC 581 (30%) as pore former at a coating level of 30% (m/m) and HPMC AS at a coating level of 15% (m/m) had the best release profiles. These pellets showed promising results in alleviating the conditions of an experimental model of colitis induced by trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid in rats.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Cellulose; Chemical Phenomena; Citric Acid; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Drug Compounding; Drug Delivery Systems; Excipients; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Lactose; Male; Methylcellulose; Particle Size; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Solubility; Tablets, Enteric-Coated

Budesonide has been studied in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of oral budesonide on liver function tests in patients with PSC and pouchitis associated with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).. The study group consisted of 18 pouch patients with underlying ulcerative colitis (UC) and PSC who were treated with 9 mg daily of budesonide for their underlying pre-pouch ileitis and pouchitis for 1-3 months followed by 3-6 mg maintenance for another 9 months. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed.. The mean age was 39.4±12.4 years (range, 21-59 years). There was no significant change in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) [median (interquartile range) (IQR) 32 (25, 43.8) vs. 35.5 (25.5, 53), p=0.35], alanine aminotransferase (ALT) [37.5 (25.5, 49.5) vs. 40 (30, 84.3), p=0.29], alkaline phosphatase [142.5 (98.5, 264.5) vs. 126 (94.3, 189.5), p=0.35], serum bilirubin [0.7 (0.4, 1.3) vs., 0.6 (0.4, 1.6), p=0.13] or albumin levels [4.3 (3.9, 4.4) vs. 4.2 (3.8, 4.4), p=0.22] at the end of the treatment period (1 year). The revised Mayo Risk Score did not change significantly and three patients required evaluation for liver transplantation during treatment. There was a significant improvement in the endoscopy subscores in the afferent limb and pouch after a year of budesonide treatment (p=0.001).. Oral budesonide appears to have no impact on liver function tests in pouch patients with PSC. However it significantly improved afferent limb and pouch inflammation in IPAA patients.

Topics: Adult; Anal Canal; Anastomosis, Surgical; Biomarkers; Budesonide; Cholangitis, Sclerosing; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonic Pouches; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Liver Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Pouchitis; Proctocolectomy, Restorative; Prospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

In inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) participate in intestinal tissue damage and regenerative processes. MMP activity is inhibited by tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) and plasma inhibitor, α₂-macroglobulin (α2M). We evaluated serum MMPs, their inhibitors and markers of neutrophil activity, myeloperoxidase (MPO) and human neutrophil elastase (HNE), during glucocorticoid (GC) and anti-TNF-α therapies in pediatric IBD, in aim to find new tools for assessment of therapeutic response.. Serum samples were collected before and within a month after the start of therapy with oral GC (n = 19) or anti-TNF-α agent (n = 16), and from 32 pediatric control patients. Serum levels of MMP-7, MMP-9, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, α2M, MPO, and HNE were analyzed with enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays (ELISA) and MMP-8 by immunofluorometric assay (IFMA). Disease activity was monitored with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), CRP, fecal calprotectin (FC), and physician's global assessment of clinical disease activity (PGA).. In IBD, pretreatment serum MMP-7, MMP-8, MMP-9, α2M, MPO, and HNE were elevated compared with controls. During GC therapy, MMP-7, TIMP-1, and MMP-7/TIMP-2 decreased (all p < 0.05). During anti-TNF-α therapy, MMP-7 decreased (p = 0.063), but remained higher than that after GC therapy (p < 0.05). α2M (p < 0.05) and HNE (p < 0.05) increased, the former higher than that in GC-treated patients. The levels of MMPs and their inhibitors did not markedly associate with inflammatory markers in blood or feces.. In pediatric IBD, serum MMP-7 mirrors disease activity, and together with TIMP-1, reflects GC therapy response. α₂-Macroglobulin expression parallels the anti-TNF-α response.

Topics: Adolescent; alpha-Macroglobulins; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Blood Sedimentation; Budesonide; C-Reactive Protein; Child; Child, Preschool; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Feces; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Infliximab; Leukocyte Elastase; Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex; Male; Matrix Metalloproteinase 7; Matrix Metalloproteinase 8; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Peroxidase; Prednisolone; Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1; Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Budesodine is a synthetic glurocorticoid that undergoes substantial first pass metabolism, limiting systemic exposure. Its use in treatment of inflammatory bowel disease would benefit from a targeting strategy that could lead to a local topical effect, improving safety and increasing anti-inflammatory efficacy. A two-step prodrug strategy involving azoreduction/cyclization that we developed previously for prednisolone is here applied with some variations to budesonide. The budesodine prodrugs were tested using an in vitro azoreductase assay simulating human colonic microflora. The kinetics of amino steroid ester cyclization and its pH dependence was also evaluated. The stability of the prodrugs systems in simulated human duodenal and gastric fluid was evaluated to determine the likelihood of intact intestinal transit. The propionic acid derived prodrug 3 undergoes rapid activation by Clostridium perfingens and its putative reduction product cyclizes with acceptable rapidity when synthesized independently. These properties of 3 suggest that it has potential in management of ulcerative colitis.

Topics: Budesonide; Clostridium perfringens; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Cyclization; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Molecular Structure; NADH, NADPH Oxidoreductases; Nitroreductases; Organ Specificity; Prodrugs

An oral colon-targeted formulation of budesonide was developed for treatment of ulcerative colitis. Budesonide conjugates were prepared using glutarate spacer and different molecular weights (MW) of dextran and their degree of substitution (DS), solubility, and stability were examined. Drug release in the presence of rat colonic contents was studied. In vivo efficacy was studied against acetic-acid induced colitis in rat. DS was dependent on polymer MW and was 7.40 ± 0.18, 5.20 ± 0.35, and 13.80 ± 0.48 mg/100 mg conjugate for MW 10,000, 70,000, and 500,000, respectively. Solubility of drug in conjugates of MW 10,000 and 70,000 was increased and was dependent on DS. The conjugates were stable in HCl 0.1 N, phosphate buffer solutions pH 6.8, and 7.4 incubated at 37°C within 6 h and degradation rate constants were <0.009 h(-1). Less than 10% of budesonide was released in contents of stomach and small intestine and it was increased significantly after incubating with colonic contents. The conjugate prepared using dextran 70,000 was selected for in vivo studies that could decrease the macroscopic and microscopic scores of induced colitis compared with mesalasine and budesonide suspension.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anhydrides; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Dextrans; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Glutarates; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Male; Mesalamine; Molecular Weight; Rats; Rats, Wistar

Budesonide is an anti-inflammatory drug of choice for treatment of ulcerative colitis which affects the rectum and a part of or the entire colon. Delivery of budesonide specifically to the colon would increase the efficacy of the drug and reduce the side-effects. The aim of this study was to develop an oral matrix system formulation for budesonide to deliver the major part of the drug to the colon for treatment of ulcerative colitis that has not been reported before. Directly compressed matrix tablets were prepared using different molecular weights of dextran and three ratios of drug-to-polymer. The physical properties of the tablets including weight variation, hardness, content uniformity, and release profile in HCl 0.1 N, phosphate buffer pH 7.4 and 6.8 containing 4% rat caecal and colonic contents were studied. The efficacy of the desired formulation was also evaluated against acetic acid-induced colitis in rats. Physical properties of the tablets were in the ranges recommended by official references. More than 10% of the drug was released in HCl 0.1 N and pH 7.4, while a very drastic increase was observed after exposure to pH 6.8 containing rat caecal contents. The efficacy of the selected formulation against rat-induced colitis was also increased in comparison to the non-targeted formulation of budesonide. In conclusion, matrix tablets with a 1:10 drug-to-dextran ratio with high molecular weight could deliver the drug specifically to the colon and are promising for treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Dextrans; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Male; Molecular Weight; Physical Phenomena; Polymers; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Rectum; Solubility; Tablets

The aim of this study was developing colon targeted-delivery of budesonide for ulcerative colitis. Microcapsules were prepared using spray drying technique by different drug-to-dextran ratios and three molecular weights (MWs) of polymer. Differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffraction (XRD), drug release and loading efficiency of microcapsules were studied. In vivo efficacy of the selected formulation prepared by 1 : 10 drug-to-polymer ratio and dextran with MW 500 000 (D10M500) against acetic acid-induced colitis in rats was evaluated and compared to the control and reference groups (mesalasine and budesonide suspensions). The results showed that D10M500 microcapsules could target the drug to colon and its efficacy in reducing macroscopic damage score was higher than mesalasine suspension. Treatment with D10M500 decreased the scores of crypt damage and total colitis significantly compared to the control group which just received the vehicle and the groups treated with mesalasine and budesonide suspension which could not reduce the colitis parameters significantly.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Calorimetry, Differential Scanning; Capsules; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Desiccation; Dextrans; Drug Compounding; Drug Delivery Systems; Male; Rats; Rats, Wistar; X-Ray Diffraction

The introduction of immunosuppressants and biologic agents has led to active debate and research about optimal therapeutic strategies considering risk factors and predictors of clinical outcome in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data about gender-specific treatment differences and risk factors is lacking for IBD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate gender-related differences in the treatment of a distinct IBD patient population treated in the Rhein-Main region, Germany.. Data about past medical history, disease status and medical treatment of 986 outpatients treated in ten gastroenterological practices and three hospitals were collected from November 1st 2005-July 31st 2007 and analyzed with regard to gender-related differences in therapy and disease management.. With the exception of an extended disease duration in women, no significant gender-related differences in demographic and clinical characteristics were observed. Men showed a significantly higher remission rate than women (p=0.025), while women received significantly less immunosuppressive medication compared to men (p=0.011). In addition, treatment with immunosuppressants was not different in women with child-bearing potential compared to menopausal women.. Our investigation demonstrates for the first time gender-specific differences in the therapeutic management in a large cohort of IBD patients.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Azathioprine; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cyclosporine; Female; Germany; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Infliximab; Male; Mercaptopurine; Mesalamine; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prospective Studies; Remission Induction; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Factors; Tacrolimus

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Azathioprine; Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastrointestinal Agents; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Infliximab; Mesalamine; Methotrexate; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prednisolone; Remission Induction

Budesonide is a potent glucocorticoid with high affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor, which is now used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Current oral formulations of budesonide present low efficacy against ulcerative colitis because of the premature drug release in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract. The objective of this study was to develop a colon specific delivery system for budesonide to increase the efficacy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Dextran-budesonide conjugates were prepared with different molecular weights (MW) of dextran (10,000, 70,000 and 500,000) in the presence of dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) using succinate spacer. The conjugates were characterized by (1)H NMR and IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The degree of substitution, aqueous solubility and chemical stability of conjugates in HCl 0.1N, phosphate buffer solutions pH 6.8 and 7.4 were studied. Drug release characteristics of the conjugates were also studied in the presence of the luminal contents of different segments of the rat gastrointestinal tract. Degree of substitution (DS) was dependent on the polymer MW and was 19.33, 14.29 and 11.60 mg/100 mg conjugate for MW 10,000, 70,000 and 500,000, respectively. Solubility of the drug in conjugates of MW 10,000 and 70,000 was increased with respect to the free drug and was dependent on DS. The three conjugates were found to be stable in HCl 0.1N, phosphate buffer solutions pH 6.8 and 7.4 incubated at 37 degrees C within 6 h and the rate constants for degradation of conjugates to budesonide and budesonide hemisuccinate were less than 0.006 h(-1). Less than 10% of the drug was released in contents of the stomach and small intestine, while about two-fold increase was observed after incubating the conjugates with colonic luminal contents. Conjugate prepared by dextran 70,000 showed the most desirable solubility, stability and release properties and could therefore be evaluated in vivo, for potential clinical use in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Topics: 4-Aminopyridine; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Dextrans; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Stability; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Male; Molecular Weight; Prodrugs; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Solubility

Pouchitis following restorative proctocolectomy is common. Inflammation proximal to the pouch, prepouch ileitis (PPI) has recently been described. Its incidence and implications are unknown. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of PPI at pouchoscopy and correlate this with symptoms, diagnosis, and outcome.. The authors searched the endoscopy database at our institution for the terms "pouchitis" and "ileitis" and reviewed hospital records.. A total of 1448 pouchoscopies were performed on 742 patients. PPI was diagnosed in 34 (5.7 percent) patients with ulcerative colitis/indeterminate colitis and 1 (0.6 percent) with polyposis. All of the patients had concurrent pouch inflammation, and in this group the incidence was 13 percent. The median length of the PPI was 10 cm. Asymptomatic patients totaled 26 percent. At follow-up (median, 12 months) no patient was reclassified to Crohn's disease, and no patients required an ileostomy for poor function.. The incidence of PPI in patients with ulcerative colitis/indeterminate colitis is 5.7 percent, and it occurs in 13 percent of patients with pouch inflammation. All of the patients had associated pouch inflammation; however, not all of the patients were symptomatic. Our results demonstrate that PPI is common in patients with pouchitis; it does not imply missed Crohn's disease or predict an increased rate of pouch failure, at least in the short term.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Ciprofloxacin; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colonic Pouches; Female; Humans; Ileitis; Incidence; Male; Mesalamine; Metronidazole; Middle Aged; Pouchitis; Proctocolectomy, Restorative; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Administration, Rectal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Enema; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Mesalamine; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Proctocolitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Topics: Administration, Rectal; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Dosage Forms; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Mesalamine; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Treatment Outcome

Nitric oxide (NO) production is increased in the human colonic mucosa in intestinal inflammation. We examined the effect of corticosteroids and the role of mononuclear cells in this production. Colonic biopsies from patients with ulcerative colitis and normal controls were cultured with either budesonide or prednisolone in the presence of proinflammatory cytokines. Human mixed mononuclear cells (MMCs) were cocultured with HT-29 cells stimulated with IFN-gamma and LPS in the presence or absence of corticosteroids. Nitrite production was measured in supernatants by a modification of the Griess reaction, and inducible NO synthase (iNOS) mRNA expression was studied in colonic tissue by RT-PCR. Both steroids significantly suppressed the nitrite production and iNOS mRNA expression in inflamed colonic biopsies from ulcerative colitis patients and in cytokine-stimulated normal colonic biopsies but not in cytokine-stimulated HT-29 cells. Nitrite production by HT-29 cells was significantly increased (P < 0.01) in cocultures with MMCs stimulated with IFN-gamma and LPS. The presence of either prednisolone or budesonide significantly (P < 0.01) suppressed nitrite production from cocultures of HT-29 cells and MMCs but not from cultures of HT-29 cells stimulated with conditioned media from activated MMCs. Interestingly, stimulation of HT-29 with conditioned media from MMCs pretreated with steroids before stimulation with LPS and IFN-gamma induced a significantly (P < 0.01) lower nitrite production. These results suggest that the inhibitory effect of corticosteroids on the NO production in the intestinal inflammation might be via the inhibition of MMC-produced mediators responsible for NO production by colonic epithelial cells.

Topics: Budesonide; Cell Line; Colitis, Ulcerative; Gene Expression; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Leukocytes; Nitric Oxide; Nitric Oxide Synthase; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Prednisolone

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Rectal; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medicine; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Mesalamine; Quality of Life; Sulfasalazine; Time Factors

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Azathioprine; Blood Transfusion; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enteral Nutrition; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Infliximab; Mesalamine; Methylprednisolone; Prednisone; Remission Induction; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Topics: Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Crohn Disease; Delayed-Action Preparations; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Ileum; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

To create a concept for measuring and valuating resource utilization of outpatient treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease in a German university hospital.. The measurement of health services was achieved using a computer-based routinely administered data base of the Medical Department. Measuring costs was performed in three steps: 1. identification of the categories of resource utilization, 2. quantitative measurement of resource use, 3. monetary valuation of the utilization of resources using German fee schedules and prices for drugs.. The resource utilization of 272 patients with a treatment period of more than 1 year could be identified in a structured form. Categories of resource use could be identified and quantitatively measured as follows: anamnesis and physical examination by a physician in 100% of the visits, laboratory tests in 87.1%, endoscopic or sonographic services in 36.9%, and radiologic procedures in 14.1%. In 93.6% of the visits a medication was prescribed. Annual costs of outpatient care provided by the hospital were 3,171 [symbol: see text] per patient. Medication accounted for 85% of total costs. Analyzing the costs of medical treatment, mesalazine was the major cost component (48%), followed by budesonide (15%).. The presented concept offers a good access to measure costs of outpatient treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. It is suitable for measuring costs in the economic evaluation of alternative treatments or diagnostic strategies in an outpatient setting. It furthermore may be used as a component in cost-of-illness studies. For transferring the concept to other hospitals, the availability of a routine documentation of services should be checked. For economic analysis, a further data management is required.

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Cost of Illness; Costs and Cost Analysis; Crohn Disease; Drug Costs; Germany; Health Care Costs; Health Resources; Hospitals, University; Humans; Mesalamine

Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Azathioprine; Budesonide; Chronic Disease; Colectomy; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Cyclosporine; Drug Combinations; Gastrointestinal Agents; Glucosamine; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Infliximab; Sulfasalazine

A 18-year-old girl suffered from chronic active ulcerative colitis for ten years with growth retardation, primary amenorrhoea and osteopenia, so that total colectomy had been discussed as a possible treatment option. However, clinical remission was reached using a medication with budesonide (9 mg), mesalazine (3 g) and azathioprine (100 mg) when a painful ulcer occurred at the right lower leg.. The clinical examination revealed an ulcer of 7 cm diameter with a red-bluish margin at the right lower leg. The typical clinical features led to the diagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum.. High doses of orally administered prednisolone induced the healing of the pyoderma gangrenosum within 2 months. After another 2 months systemic steroids were discontinued. Further laboratory tests confirmed secondary adrenal and ovarian failure (negative CRH-GnRH-test). Change of drug therapy to hydrocortisone (25 mg) in combination with mesalazine (3 g) and azathioprine (100 mg) improved the clinical course. Hydrocortisone was gradually reduced until CRH-GnRH-response returned to normal.. Drug therapy with azathioprine can be regarded as a treatment option in pediatric patients with chronic active inflammatory bowel disease. It can be concluded from this case report that faced with controversial therapeutic options in adolescent patients the decision mainly depends on the clinical experience of the physician than on the results of controlled clinical trials.

Topics: Adolescent; Azathioprine; Budesonide; Child; Colitis, Ulcerative; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Leg Ulcer; Male; Mesalamine; Prednisolone; Pyoderma Gangrenosum; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Clinical Protocols; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Netherlands; Pharmacopoeias as Topic; Prednisolone

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Chronic Disease; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Humans; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Glucocorticoids are an effective treatment of ulcerative colitis. The occurrence of steroid side effects depends on dosage and duration of steroid treatment. It may be a high as 80%. A rare side effect of glucocorticoid therapy is steroid induced myopathia. There exists an acute and a chronic form of steroid induced myopathia. Chronic steroid myopathia affects mainly the proximal musculature of the lower and upper extremities and leads to proximal muscle weakness. Histologically, an atrophy of type IIb-muscle fibers can be found. Chronic steroid myopathia occurs after prolonged treatment with higher doses of glucocorticoids.. The case report describes a 25 year old male patient with left-sided ulcerative colitis who developed chronic steroid myopathia after several months of glucocorticoid treatment. After switching from systemic steroids to budesonide the symptoms of myopathia disappeared. Left-sided ulcerative colitis remained in remission.. The case documents the disappearance of a severe steroid side effect after switching from a systemic steroid to budesonide.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Muscular Atrophy; Prednisolone; Pregnenediones

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis are chronic intestinal diseases usually treated with various nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents to maintain remission. Corticosteroids, while useful in acute treatment of these diseases, present side-effects generally too serious to allow maintenance therapy. Colon-specific drug delivery may permit use of corticosteroids for maintenance therapy if doses can be reduced while maintaining efficacy. In this study, two prodrugs (dexamethasone-beta-D-glucuronide (DXglrd) and budesonide-beta-D-glucuronide (BUDglrd)) were administered by intragastric (i.g.) infusion to conventional and colitic rats. In addition, dexamethasone (DX) and budesonide (BUD) were administered either i.g. or subcutaneously (s.c.) to healthy and colitic rats. Colon-specific delivery was assessed using the drug delivery index (DDI). In conventinal rats, DDIs for DXglrd ranged from about five to as high as 11 in the luminal contents relative to DX administered sc or i.g. DDI values were also elevated in the mucosa of both healthy and colitic rats following i.g. administration of DXglrd. BUD was delivered somewhat less effectively from BUDglrd to the rat large intestine than was DX from DXglrd. The data are consistent with efficacy studies and support the conclusion that local delivery of corticosteroids to the large intestine is due, at least in part, to higher levels of drug delivery into the mucosal tissues.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biological Availability; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Dexamethasone; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Delivery Systems; Glucocorticoids; Glucuronates; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Prodrugs; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) only occasionally affects the lung. Noteworthy among the various pulmonary entities related to IBD are chronic bronchitis and bronchiectasis, though reports of bronchiolitis, obliterants bronchiolitis with organizing pneumonia and other interstitial diseases have also been published. Given the rarity of such pneumopathy, we report a case of bronchiolitis in a patient with a prior diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. We discuss the radiological findings and the results of lung function testing, emphasizin the utility of corticosteroid treatment, which usually leads to a good outcome in pneumopathy secondary to IBD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adult; Aerosols; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Bronchiolitis; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Prednisone; Pregnenediones; Radiography, Thoracic; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Pregnenediones

Severe upper airway stenosis was diagnosed in a 23 year old woman who presented with hoarseness, cough and dyspnoea 8 yrs after initial diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. The respiratory symptoms worsened over the next few months, the patient eventually developing dysphagia and ultimately severe upper airway obstruction. The narrowest site was the glottis, which was severely stenosed by inflammatory swellings. Systemic corticosteroids led to rapid clinical improvement and restoration of normal airway patency within a few months. Ulcerative colitis is frequently associated with extraintestinal inflammatory manifestations. In the respiratory tract these usually take the form of chronic bronchitis, which occasionally develops into bronchiectasis. This case confirms that the inflammation can also involve the larynx and large airways.

Topics: Adult; Bronchodilator Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Granuloma, Plasma Cell; Humans; Laryngostenosis; Prednisone; Pregnenediones; Tracheal Stenosis

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Enema; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Pregnenediones

Topics: Administration, Topical; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Beclomethasone; Betamethasone Valerate; Budesonide; Colitis, Ulcerative; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Prednisolone; Pregnenediones