Page last updated: 2024-10-20
pteridines and Thrombopenia
pteridines has been researched along with Thrombopenia in 1 studies
Research Excerpts
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
"To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of volasertib, a Polo-like kinase inhibitor, combined with afatinib, an oral irreversible ErbB family blocker, in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT01206816; Study 1230." | 2.80 | A phase I study of volasertib combined with afatinib, in advanced solid tumors. ( De Smet, M; Herremans, C; Liu, D; Machiels, JP; Peeters, M; Pilz, K; Rottey, S; Specenier, P; Strelkowa, N; Surmont, V, 2015) |
Research
Studies (1)
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 1 (100.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors
Authors | Studies |
Machiels, JP | 1 |
Peeters, M | 1 |
Herremans, C | 1 |
Surmont, V | 1 |
Specenier, P | 1 |
De Smet, M | 1 |
Pilz, K | 1 |
Strelkowa, N | 1 |
Liu, D | 1 |
Rottey, S | 1 |
Clinical Trials (1)
Trial Overview
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status |
An Open Label Phase I Dose Escalation Trial of Intravenous BI 6727 in Combination With Oral BIBW 2992 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours With Repeated Administration in Patients With Clinical Benefit[NCT01206816] | Phase 1 | 57 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-10-04 | Completed |
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Trial Outcomes
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
MTD was defined on the basis of DLTs occuring during Cycle 1 of the dose escalation part in each of the 2 treatment schedules. DLTs were defined as drug related based on Common Terminology Criteria for AE's (CTCAE) Grade(G) :1) G4 neutropenia (ANC, including bands, <500/mm³) for more than 7 days, 2) G3 or 4 neutropenia associated with fever >38.5° C (febrile neutropenia),3) Neutropenic infection G ≥3, 4) G4 thrombocytopenia or G3 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring whole blood transfusion.5) Non-haematological G ≥3 toxicity excluding: (a) untreated G3 diarrhoea, (b) untreated G3 nausea and/or vomiting, (c) untreated G3 rash. 6) G2 increase in AST and/or ALT in conjunction with an elevated bilirubin level of G ≥2, 7) G2 nausea and/or vomiting despite optimal supportive/antiemetic treatment for at least 7consecutive days. 8) G2 diarrhoea for 2 or more consecutive days despite antidiarrhoeal medication/hydration, 9) Decrease in left ventricular function G ≥2. (NCT01206816)
Timeframe: 22 Days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Volasertib150 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 0 |
Volasertib 225 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 0 |
Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 3 |
Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 40 mg (Schedule A) | 2 |
Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 50 mg (Schedule B) | 0 |
Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 70 mg (Schedule B) | 5 |
Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 90 mg (Schedule B) | 2 |
Number of Patients With Drug-related Adverse Events According to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Criteria v 3.0
Number of patients with investigator defined drug-related adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria v 3.0 (NCT01206816)
Timeframe: After the first drug administration until 28 days after the last drug administration, up to 413 days.
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Volasertib150 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 3 |
Volasertib 225 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 3 |
Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 18 |
Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 40 mg (Schedule A) | 3 |
Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 50 mg (Schedule B) | 3 |
Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 70 mg (Schedule B) | 19 |
Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 90 mg (Schedule B) | 6 |
Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD) of Two Combination Therapy of Volasertib and Afatinib.
"Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD) was determined by dose escalation for volasertib and afatinib. The 3 + 3 design with de-escalation for both the Schedules A and B. Patients were sequentially allocated to the dose cohorts. Apart from allocation to the treatment schedules, escalation and/or de-escalation to determine the MTD occurred independently within the 2 dose schedules. Cohorts of 3 patients were to be treated at the starting dose levels according to the treatment schedule. Before entering patients at a higher dose level, all patients at the previous dose level combination had to complete at least the initial cycle of 21 days." (NCT01206816)
Timeframe: MTD was assessed during the first cycle of combination of Volasertib and Afatinib therapy (22 days)
Intervention | mg (Number) |
---|
| Volasertib | Afatinib |
---|
Volasertib in Combination With Afatinib (Schedule A) | 300 | 30 |
,Volasertib in Combination With Afatinib (Schedule B) | 300 | 70 |
Number of Patients With Best Overall Response.
"Best overall response based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Best overall response is defined as complete response, partial response, stable disease, progressive disease or not evaluable.~As Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by using appropriate radiology techniques: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; progression, as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression." (NCT01206816)
Timeframe: Tumor assessment was performed at screening and at the end of every 3 treatment cycle (ie every 9 weeks of treatment).
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Complete response | Partial response | Stable disease | Progressive disease | Not evaluable | Unknown |
---|
Volasertib 225 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 2 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 40 mg (Schedule A) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 50 mg (Schedule B) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 70 mg (Schedule B) | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 4 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 90 mg (Schedule B) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
,Volasertib150 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Number of Patients With Disease Control
"Disease control based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Patients who had a best overall tumour response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) were assessed to show disease control.~As Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by using appropriate radiology techniques: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression." (NCT01206816)
Timeframe: Tumor assessment was performed at screening and at the end of every 3 treatment cycle (ie every 9 weeks of treatment).
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| YES | NO | Unknown |
---|
Volasertib 225 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 0 | 3 | 0 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 9 | 9 | 2 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 40 mg (Schedule A) | 0 | 3 | 0 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 50 mg (Schedule B) | 1 | 2 | 0 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 70 mg (Schedule B) | 5 | 10 | 4 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 90 mg (Schedule B) | 2 | 4 | 0 |
,Volasertib150 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Number of Patients With Objective Response (OR)
"Objective tumor response based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. OR is defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).~As Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by using appropriate radiology techniques: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions." (NCT01206816)
Timeframe: Tumor assessment was performed at screening and at the end of every 3 treatment cycle (ie every 9 weeks of treatment).
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Yes | No | Unknown |
---|
Volasertib 225 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 0 | 3 | 0 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 1 | 17 | 2 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 40 mg (Schedule A) | 0 | 3 | 0 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 50 mg (Schedule B) | 0 | 3 | 0 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 70 mg (Schedule B) | 0 | 15 | 4 |
,Volasertib 300 mg+Afatinib 90 mg (Schedule B) | 0 | 6 | 0 |
,Volasertib150 mg+Afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Trials
1 trial available for pteridines and Thrombopenia