prucalopride has been researched along with Intestinal-Obstruction* in 3 studies
1 review(s) available for prucalopride and Intestinal-Obstruction
Article | Year |
---|---|
[Pelvic floor and anal incontinence. Conservative therapy].
Conservative treatment of fecal incontinence and obstructive defecation can be treated by many conservative treatment modalities. This article presents the options of medication therapy, spincter exercises, electric stimulation, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, anal irrigation and injection of bulking agents. These methods are presented with reference to the currently available literature but the evidence-based data level for all methods is low. For minor disorders of anorectal function these conservative methods can lead to an improvement of anorectal function and should be individually adapted. Topics: Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Benzofurans; Combined Modality Therapy; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Evidence-Based Medicine; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction; Loperamide; Male; Pelvic Floor Disorders; Physical Therapy Modalities; Polyethylene Glycols; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Serotonin 5-HT4 Receptor Agonists; Surface-Active Agents; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation | 2013 |
2 other study(ies) available for prucalopride and Intestinal-Obstruction
Article | Year |
---|---|
The association between prucalopride efficacy and constipation type.
Prucalopride is a selective serotonin receptor agonist with prokinetic activity, indicated for women with chronic constipation in whom laxatives have failed to provide adequate relief. Data suggests an improvement in about 50 % of such patients but whether the therapeutic effect is on patients with slow transit constipation (STC) and/or obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS), or even those with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) is unknown. We therefore assessed whether there is any association between prucalopride efficacy and constipation type.. All patients receiving prucalopride between June 2010 and April 2012 at our institution were identified, and data analysed following a 4-week "test" period. Patients were sub-grouped as those suffering with ODS, STC, mixed (ODS and STC) or IBS-C based on symptomatology and investigations. Subjective assessment of patient satisfaction and continuation of medication were taken as positive outcomes and analysed for each sub-type along with any side effects.. Sixty-nine patients met our criteria. Data were available for 59 women (median age 46 years, range 17-79 years). Sixty-five per cent of prescriptions came from colorectal surgeons. Overall, 25 out of 59 (42 %) patients improved, according to our criteria, after the 4-week trial period. Seventeen patients (29 %) had ODS, 26 (44 %) had STC, 7 (12 %) had mixed symptoms and 9 (15 %) had IBS-C. At 4 weeks, 10 out of 17 patients (59 %) with ODS had improved compared with 4 out of 9 patients (44 %) with IBS-C, 3 out of 7 patients (43 %) with mixed symptoms and 8 out of 26 (31 %) patients with STC. The underlying disorder did not predict whether or not a patient responded to the 4-week trial period (p = 0.32). Nine patients (15 %) experienced side effects that precluded further use.. Patients with all categories of constipation may respond to prucalopride. A trial regime may be indicated regardless of the aetiology of the constipation. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzofurans; Cohort Studies; Constipation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrointestinal Transit; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Retrospective Studies; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Severity of Illness Index; Syndrome; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult | 2013 |
The use of prucalopride in real life for the treatment of constipation subtypes: ups and downs.
Topics: Benzofurans; Constipation; Female; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction; Serotonin Receptor Agonists | 2013 |