prucalopride has been researched along with Abdominal-Pain* in 8 studies
1 review(s) available for prucalopride and Abdominal-Pain
Article | Year |
---|---|
Drug therapy options for patients with irritable bowel syndrome.
Existing pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are limited in treating the multiple symptoms associated with the disorder. There is much interest in the use of serotonin agents as new therapeutics. Acting primarily through 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 receptors, serotonin elicits changes in motor function and possibly visceral sensation. Two serotonin agents were developed specifically for IBS: tegaserod, a 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist, and alosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (which is no longer available). Phase III clinical trial data show that during a 12-week treatment period with tegaserod, IBS patients with abdominal pain and discomfort, bloating, and constipation experienced significant global relief (i.e., improvement in overall well-being, abdominal pain, and bowel habit) compared with placebo. Improvement in bowel movement frequency and consistency was achieved and pain was relieved by 1 week. During 12 weeks of treatment, alosetron was shown to elicit significant relief of abdominal pain and discomfort compared with placebo or mebeverine in female IBS patients with diarrhea. Alosetron slowed colonic transit and treatment efficacy was apparent after a week of treatment. Another 5-HT4 receptor agonist, prucalopride, which is being developed for chronic constipation, accelerates colonic transit and increases stool frequency. Therefore, this agent may be of benefit in IBS patients with constipation. Topics: Abdominal Pain; Benzofurans; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colonic Diseases, Functional; Constipation; Gastrointestinal Motility; Humans; Indoles; Serotonin; Serotonin Antagonists; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; United States | 2001 |
4 trial(s) available for prucalopride and Abdominal-Pain
Article | Year |
---|---|
Efficacy of Prucalopride for Chronic Idiopathic Constipation: An Analysis of Participants With Moderate to Very Severe Abdominal Bloating.
This post hoc analysis evaluated the effect of prucalopride on abdominal bloating in participants with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) who had moderate to very severe bloating at baseline.. Data from 6 phase 3/4 studies of prucalopride in participants with CIC were pooled. Abdominal bloating was assessed weekly using a 5-point scale (0-4).. The proportion of bloating responders (≥1-point improvement in abdominal bloating score at week 12) was higher in participants treated with prucalopride (62.1%) vs placebo (49.6%).. The prucalopride arm had a higher proportion of bloating responders vs placebo in this study population. Topics: Abdominal Pain; Aged; Benzofurans; Chronic Disease; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Laxatives; Male; Pain Measurement; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome | 2022 |
A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of 1-L polyethylene glycol solution with ascorbic acid plus prucalopride versus 2-L polyethylene glycol solution with ascorbic acid for bowel preparation.
Bowel cleansing is a major patient complaint during colonoscopy. Adding laxatives to the bowel preparation is effective in replacing a portion of bowel preparation solution and reducing its volume. Prucalopride is a serotonin receptor agonist that stimulates gastrointestinal motility and provides propulsive force for defecation. This study aimed to compare 1 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) with ascorbic acid (Asc) plus 2 mg prucalopride (1LP/AP) and 2 L PEG with Asc (2LP/A) for colonoscopy preparation with respect to bowel-cleansing quality and side effects.. A single-center, randomized, prospective study was conducted with 260 outpatients administered either 1LP/AP or 2LP/A. The primary endpoint was bowel preparation quality, which was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale and Aronchick Bowel Preparation Scale, and the secondary endpoints were patient tolerability and acceptability, assessed by a questionnaire-based survey.. The adequate bowel preparation rates were 88.5% and 83.1% in the 2LP/A and 1LP/AP groups, respectively, and the efficacy of 1LP/AP was equivalent to the control regimen (p=.216). Other colonoscopic variables including adenoma detection rate were similar in both groups. Patient tolerability and acceptability were not significantly different, but patients in the 1LP/AP group were more willing to repeat the same regimen (p=.039).. Bowel preparation quality with 1LP/AP was equivalent to that with 2LP/A, which did not increase the occurrence of side effects, but it reduced the volume of the solution ingested, and increased patient satisfaction. Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Aged; Ascorbic Acid; Benzofurans; Cathartics; Colonoscopy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Polyethylene Glycols; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Surveys and Questionnaires | 2018 |
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prucalopride in men with chronic constipation.
Prucalopride is effective at alleviating symptoms of chronic constipation in women. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of 12 weeks of prucalopride treatment compared with placebo in men with chronic constipation.. This was a multicenter, stratified, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01147926). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a mean of three or more spontaneous complete bowel movements (SCBMs) per week across the treatment period. Efficacy end points were assessed using daily electronic diaries, global assessment of the severity of constipation and efficacy of treatment, and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms (PAC-SYM) and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaires.. In total, 374 patients were enrolled in the study. Significantly more patients achieved a mean of three or more SCBMs per week in the prucalopride group (37.9%) than in the placebo group (17.7%, P<0.0001). The proportion of patients rating their constipation treatment as "quite a bit" to "extremely" effective at the final on-treatment visit was 46.7 and 30.4% in the prucalopride and placebo groups, respectively. The difference between treatment groups was statistically significant (P<0.0001). The proportion of patients with an improvement of at least 1 point in PAC-QOL satisfaction subscale score was 52.7 and 38.8% in the prucalopride and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.0035). Prucalopride had a good safety profile and was well tolerated.. Prucalopride is effective, has a good safety profile, and is well tolerated for the treatment of men with chronic constipation. Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Aged; Benzofurans; Chronic Disease; Defecation; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Headache; Humans; Male; Medical Records; Middle Aged; Nausea; Quality of Life; Serotonin 5-HT4 Receptor Agonists; Severity of Illness Index; Surveys and Questionnaires | 2015 |
Efficacy and safety of prucalopride in patients with chronic noncancer pain suffering from opioid-induced constipation.
Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) has negative effects on quality of life (QOL). Prucalopride is a new, selective 5-HT(4) agonist and enterokinetic with strong clinical data in chronic constipation. This study investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prucalopride in patients with noncancer pain and OIC.. A phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 196 patients randomized to placebo (n = 66), prucalopride 2 mg (n = 66) or 4 mg (n = 64), for 4 weeks, was carried out. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with increase from baseline of ≥ 1 spontaneous complete bowel movement (SCBM)/week. Secondary endpoints [proportion of patients with ≥ 3 SCBM/week, weekly frequency of (SC)BM, severity of constipation, and efficacy of treatment], adverse events (AEs), and safety parameters were also monitored.. More patients had an increase from baseline of ≥ 1 SCBM per week (weeks 1-4) in the prucalopride groups [35.9% (2 mg) and 40.3% (4 mg)] versus placebo (23.4%), reaching statistical significance in week 1. Over weeks 1-4, more patients in the prucalopride groups achieved an average of ≥ 3 SBM per week versus placebo (60.7% and 69.0% versus 43.3%), reaching significance at week 1. Prucalopride 4 mg significantly improved patient-rated severity of constipation and effectiveness of treatment versus placebo. Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptom (PAC-SYM) total scores and Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) total and satisfaction subscale scores were improved. The most common AEs were abdominal pain and nausea. There were no clinically relevant differences between groups in vital signs, laboratory measures or electrocardiogram parameters.. In this population with OIC, prucalopride improved bowel function and was safe and well tolerated. Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Benzofurans; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Laxatives; Male; Middle Aged; Placebo Effect; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Treatment Outcome; Vital Signs; Young Adult | 2010 |
3 other study(ies) available for prucalopride and Abdominal-Pain
Article | Year |
---|---|
Factors predictive of treatment-emergent adverse events of prucalopride: an integrated analysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.
This integrated analysis aimed to identify the factors associated with the most frequently re-ported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in Asian and non-Asian patients with chronic constipation (CC) who receive prucalopride or placebo over 12 weeks.. Pooled data from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase III studies (NCT00488137, NCT00483886, NCT00485940, and NCT01116206) on pa-tients treated with prucalopride 2 mg or placebo were ana-lyzed. The associations between predictors and TEAEs were evaluated based on a logistic regression model.. Overall, 1,821 patients (Asian, 26.1%; non-Asian, 73.9%) were analyzed. Prucalopride treatment was significantly as-sociated with diarrhea, headache, and nausea (p<0.001), but not with abdominal pain, compared with placebo. Differ-ences in the prevalence of TEAEs between prucalopride and placebo decreased greatly after the first day of treatment. Compared with non-Asians, Asians were more likely to expe-rience diarrhea and less likely to develop abdominal pain, headache, and nausea. Prior laxative use, CC duration, and body weight were not predictive of any of these TEAEs. Con-clusions Prucalopride treatment was positively associated with diarrhea, headache, and nausea. Asian patients tended to have a higher frequency of diarrhea but lower frequencies of headache, abdominal pain, and nausea compared with non-Asians. (Gut Liver, 2015;9208-213). Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian People; Benzofurans; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Constipation; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Female; Headache; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Nausea; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Regression Analysis | 2015 |
The 5HT4 receptor agonist prucalopride suppresses abdominal nociception.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Animals; Benzofurans; Dogs; Female; Humans; Nociception; Serotonin 5-HT4 Receptor Agonists | 2015 |
Prucalopride in a case of severe opioid induced constipation.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Analgesics, Opioid; Benzofurans; Constipation; Female; Hemangioma; Humans; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Serotonin 5-HT4 Receptor Agonists; Spinal Neoplasms | 2012 |