procaine has been researched along with Allergy, Drug in 100 studies
Procaine: A local anesthetic of the ester type that has a slow onset and a short duration of action. It is mainly used for infiltration anesthesia, peripheral nerve block, and spinal block. (From Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 30th ed, p1016).
procaine : A benzoate ester, formally the result of esterification of 4-aminobenzoic acid with 2-diethylaminoethanol but formed experimentally by reaction of ethyl 4-aminobenzoate with 2-diethylaminoethanol.
| Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| " We retrospectively reviewed all our consultations for evaluation of local anesthetic allergy from 1965 to 1985 to assess the safety and efficacy of skin testing and provocative test dosing with a variety of local anesthetic agents." | 1.27 | Provocative challenge with local anesthetics in patients with a prior history of reaction. ( Chandler, MJ; Grammer, LC; Patterson, R, 1987) |
| Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
|---|---|---|
| pre-1990 | 91 (91.00) | 18.7374 |
| 1990's | 3 (3.00) | 18.2507 |
| 2000's | 4 (4.00) | 29.6817 |
| 2010's | 2 (2.00) | 24.3611 |
| 2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
| Authors | Studies |
|---|---|
| Weckmann, G | 1 |
| Haase, A | 1 |
| Chenot, JF | 1 |
| Guttman, K | 1 |
| Ball, TS | 1 |
| Cox, B | 1 |
| Durieux, ME | 1 |
| Marcus, MA | 1 |
| Morais-Almeida, M | 1 |
| Gaspar, A | 1 |
| Marinho, S | 1 |
| Rosado-Pinto, J | 1 |
| CRIEP, LH | 2 |
| RIBEIRO, CC | 1 |
| RICKLES, NH | 1 |
| LELIE, LH | 1 |
| CHIPPS, JE | 1 |
| ZUCKER, E | 1 |
| NILZEN, A | 2 |
| FERNSTROM, AI | 5 |
| CERCIELLO, G | 1 |
| KIMURA, Y | 1 |
| TAKAHASHI, R | 1 |
| HOSAKA, M | 1 |
| TAKEFUJI, H | 1 |
| NAGOSHI, Y | 1 |
| KANEKO, Z | 1 |
| UMEZAWA, S | 1 |
| MICHINOSHITA, K | 1 |
| TAKEMIYA, S | 1 |
| MIYABE, I | 1 |
| SUGIYAMA, S | 1 |
| KIMURA, S | 1 |
| NAKAZAWA, A | 1 |
| FURUYA, M | 1 |
| HOSOGAWA, A | 1 |
| KOBAYASHI, Y | 1 |
| WELLMAN, WE | 1 |
| SENFT, RA | 1 |
| BARTOLI, V | 1 |
| MORANDINI, G | 1 |
| MASALA, C | 1 |
| HLOUCAL, L | 1 |
| LUTON, EF | 1 |
| CAMPOLATTARO, JP | 1 |
| HAROLDSON, JH | 1 |
| HOIGNE, R | 1 |
| KREBS, A | 1 |
| BERTELSEN, K | 1 |
| DALGAARD, JB | 1 |
| ADLER, P | 1 |
| SIMON, N | 1 |
| MERLEN, JF | 1 |
| VASTESAEGER, M | 1 |
| CHEVAT, H | 1 |
| HELLMAN, E | 1 |
| Dance, D | 1 |
| Basti, S | 1 |
| Koch, DD | 1 |
| Becker, DE | 1 |
| Reed, KL | 1 |
| Johnson, WT | 1 |
| DeStigter, T | 1 |
| Brubnjak-Jevtic, V | 1 |
| Cohn, HC | 1 |
| Jocson, VL | 1 |
| Crowhust, JA | 1 |
| Moore, DC | 1 |
| Bacon, GS | 1 |
| Lyons, TR | 1 |
| Wood, SH | 1 |
| Protasevich, GS | 1 |
| Verin, P | 1 |
| Vildy, A | 1 |
| Sabbah, A | 1 |
| Giovannitti, JA | 1 |
| Bennett, CR | 1 |
| Wightman, MA | 1 |
| Vaughan, RW | 1 |
| Islam, MS | 1 |
| Zimmermann, I | 1 |
| Ulmer, WT | 1 |
| Kraus, SJ | 2 |
| Green, RL | 2 |
| Norden, LC | 1 |
| Diaz, PM | 1 |
| Weiner, AL | 1 |
| Semenovich, NI | 1 |
| Samoĭlova, LN | 1 |
| Badina, AK | 1 |
| Fisher, AA | 1 |
| Levy, SM | 1 |
| Baker, KA | 1 |
| Chandler, MJ | 1 |
| Grammer, LC | 1 |
| Patterson, R | 1 |
| Ivey, DF | 1 |
| Sehhati, G | 1 |
| Frey, R | 1 |
| Mildner, R | 1 |
| Smith, RB | 1 |
| Everett, WG | 1 |
| Buchholz, W | 1 |
| Păunescu-Pondeanu, A | 1 |
| Heissen, E | 1 |
| Teske, HJ | 1 |
| Haller, J | 1 |
| Kulcsár, S | 1 |
| Paulsen, K | 1 |
| Reinhardt, M | 1 |
| Brassai, Z | 1 |
| Hadnagy, C | 1 |
| Horváth, E | 1 |
| Nagy, L | 1 |
| Zatikian, LO | 1 |
| Harris, R | 1 |
| Rosenberg, JM | 1 |
| Peritore, SP | 1 |
| Anderson, KA | 1 |
| Guzzetti, PJ | 1 |
| Rood, JP | 1 |
| Covino, BG | 1 |
| Wasmuth, CE | 1 |
| Judit, BS | 1 |
| Pokin'chereda, VV | 1 |
| Mikhaĭliv, VT | 1 |
| Hegyi, E | 4 |
| Sinka, L | 5 |
| Lewis, JE | 1 |
| Frederickson, EL | 1 |
| Oppermann, J | 1 |
| Oelschläger, H | 1 |
| Nieschulz, O | 1 |
| Meyer, F | 1 |
| Schulz, KH | 1 |
| Rudzki, E | 1 |
| Kleniewska, D | 1 |
| Baranowska, E | 1 |
| Zuffa, M | 1 |
| Mensatoris, K | 1 |
| Lehotský, E | 1 |
| Kubancok, J | 1 |
| Aldrete, JA | 1 |
| O'Higgins, JW | 1 |
| Geddes, IC | 1 |
| Farrerons-Co, J | 1 |
| Downs, JR | 1 |
| Gruszecka, M | 1 |
| Kralisz, W | 1 |
| Ado, VA | 1 |
| Martiushoe, EA | 1 |
| Vrsansky, V | 2 |
| Tajmírová, O | 2 |
| Jánoska, A | 4 |
| Bartlett, DA | 1 |
| Schlettwein-Gsell, D | 1 |
| Servienti, JA | 1 |
| Ruilopez, M | 1 |
| Ostrovskiĭ, AG | 1 |
| Popa, V | 1 |
| Zsigmond, EK | 1 |
| Eilderton, TE | 1 |
| Hudáková, G | 1 |
| Lacki, L | 1 |
| Chelkowska, H | 1 |
| Jedrzejewska, A | 1 |
| Vedmedenko, AI | 1 |
| Loza, EP | 1 |
| Wiegershausen, B | 1 |
| Abragam, KA | 1 |
| Düngemann, H | 1 |
| Borelli, S | 1 |
| Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Evaluation of Arrhythmia Mapping With a Globe-Shaped, High-Density, Multi-Electrode Mapping Catheter[NCT05373862] | 40 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2022-07-29 | Completed | |||
| Clinical Evaluation of Arrhythmia Mapping With the Multi-Electrode OPTRELL™ Mapping Catheter[NCT04983797] | 31 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2021-08-25 | Completed | |||
| Clinical Evaluation of Intracardiac Ultrasound With the NUVISION NAV Ultrasound Catheter[NCT05970120] | 30 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-09-05 | Recruiting | |||
| Intravenous Lidocaine for Perioperative and Postoperative Analgesia[NCT03921567] | Phase 4 | 520 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2019-04-15 | Recruiting | ||
| The Comparison Between Dexamethasone and Morphine as an Adjuvant to Epidural Bupivacaine for Post-operative Analgesia in Lower Extremity Surgery[NCT03051022] | 64 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-05-01 | Completed | |||
| Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Homologous Active Principles for Local Dental Anesthesia: Non-inferiority Trial[NCT04166890] | Phase 4 | 179 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-09-04 | Completed | ||
| [information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] | |||||||
Number of participants with non-serious adverse events within 7 days of index procedure associated with the use of the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
|---|---|
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 0 |
Number of participants with pre-ablation mapping and clinically indicated mapping performed with the OPTRELL catheter without resort to other mapping catheters were reported. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 72 days
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
|---|---|
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 31 |
Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
|---|---|
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 3 |
Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure related to the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
|---|---|
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 0 |
Number of responders for physician assessment for ability to characterize the tissue were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for ability to characterize the tissue. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 72 days
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 1 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 2 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 3 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 4 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 5 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 6 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 7 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 1 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 2 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 3 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 4 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 5 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 6 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 7 | |
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
Number of responders with physician assessment for arrhythmogenicity were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for arrhythmogenicity. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 72 days
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 1 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 2 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 3 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 4 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 5 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 6 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 7 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 1 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 2 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 3 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 4 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 5 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 6 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 7 | |
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 19 | 1 |
Number of responders for physician assessment for catheter design were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheter design in OPTRELL catheter for mapping. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 72 days
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 1 | Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 2 | Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 3 | Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 4 | Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 5 | Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 6 | Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 7 | Electrodes spacing: Score 1 | Electrodes spacing: Score 2 | Electrodes spacing: Score 3 | Electrodes spacing: Score 4 | Electrodes spacing: Score 5 | Electrodes spacing: Score 6 | Electrodes spacing: Score 7 | Electrode array coverage: Score 1 | Electrode array coverage: Score 2 | Electrode array coverage: Score 3 | Electrode array coverage: Score 4 | Electrode array coverage: Score 5 | Electrode array coverage: Score 6 | Electrode array coverage: Score 7 | |
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 21 |
Number of responders for physician assessment for catheter visualization were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheter visualization. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 72 days
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 1 | Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 2 | Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 3 | Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 4 | Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 5 | Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 6 | Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 7 | Visualization in CARTO 3: Score 1 | Visualization in CARTO 3: Score 2 | Visualization in CARTO 3: Score 3 | Visualization in CARTO 3: Score 4 | Visualization in CARTO 3: Score 5 | Visualization in CARTO 3: Score 6 | Visualization in CARTO 3: Score 7 | |
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 18 |
Number of responders for physician assessment for catheters interactions were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheters interactions. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 72 days
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With CARTO 3 System: Score 1 | With CARTO 3 System: Score 2 | With CARTO 3 System: Score 3 | With CARTO 3 System: Score 4 | With CARTO 3 System: Score 5 | With CARTO 3 System: Score 6 | With CARTO 3 System: Score 7 | EP Lab recording equipment: Score 1 | EP Lab recording equipment: Score 2 | EP Lab recording equipment: Score 3 | EP Lab recording equipment: Score 4 | EP Lab recording equipment: Score 5 | EP Lab recording equipment: Score 6 | EP Lab recording equipment: Score 7 | Pacing equipment: Score 1 | Pacing equipment: Score 2 | Pacing equipment: Score 3 | Pacing equipment: Score 4 | Pacing equipment: Score 5 | Pacing equipment: Score 6 | Pacing equipment: Score 7 | Introducer tool on catheter: Score 1 | Introducer tool on catheter: Score 2 | Introducer tool on catheter: Score 3 | Introducer tool on catheter: Score 4 | Introducer tool on catheter: Score 5 | Introducer tool on catheter: Score 6 | Introducer tool on catheter: Score 7 | Sheath: Score 1 | Sheath: Score 2 | Sheath: Score 3 | Sheath: Score 4 | Sheath: Score 5 | Sheath: Score 6 | Sheath: Score 7 | Irrigation bag and tubing: Score 1 | Irrigation bag and tubing: Score 2 | Irrigation bag and tubing: Score 3 | Irrigation bag and tubing: Score 4 | Irrigation bag and tubing: Score 5 | Irrigation bag and tubing: Score 6 | Irrigation bag and tubing: Score 7 | ICD or other implantable devices: Score 1 | ICD or other implantable devices: Score 2 | ICD or other implantable devices: Score 3 | ICD or other implantable devices: Score 4 | ICD or other implantable devices: Score 5 | ICD or other implantable devices: Score 6 | ICD or other implantable devices: Score 7 | |
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Number of responders for physician assessment for design and coverage for confirming PVI were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for design and coverage for confirming PVI. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 72 days
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 1 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 2 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 3 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 4 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 5 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 6 | Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 7 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 1 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 2 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 3 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 4 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 5 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 6 | Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 7 | |
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 4 |
Number of responders for physician assessment for maneuverability & handling were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for maneuverability & handling. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 72 days
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 1 | Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 2 | Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 3 | Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 4 | Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 5 | Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 6 | Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 7 | Ability to Deploy (Right Atrium): Score 1 | Ability to Deploy (Right Atrium): Score 2 | Ability to Deploy (Right Atrium): Score 3 | Ability to Deploy (Right Atrium): Score 4 | Ability to Deploy (Right Atrium): Score 5 | Ability to Deploy (Right Atrium): Score 6 | Ability to Deploy (Right Atrium): Score 7 | Ability to Deploy (Left Ventricle): Score 1 | Ability to Deploy (Left Ventricle): Score 2 | Ability to Deploy (Left Ventricle): Score 3 | Ability to Deploy (Left Ventricle): Score 4 | Ability to Deploy (Left Ventricle): Score 5 | Ability to Deploy (Left Ventricle): Score 6 | Ability to Deploy (Left Ventricle): Score 7 | Ability to Deploy (Right Ventricle): Score 1 | Ability to Deploy (Right Ventricle): Score 2 | Ability to Deploy (Right Ventricle): Score 3 | Ability to Deploy (Right Ventricle): Score 4 | Ability to Deploy (Right Ventricle): Score 5 | Ability to Deploy (Right Ventricle): Score 6 | Ability to Deploy (Right Ventricle): Score 7 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Atrium): Score 1 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Atrium): Score 2 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Atrium): Score 3 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Atrium): Score 4 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Atrium): Score 5 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Atrium): Score 6 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Atrium): Score 7 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Atrium): Score 1 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Atrium): Score 2 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Atrium): Score 3 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Atrium): Score 4 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Atrium): Score 5 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Atrium): Score 6 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Atrium): Score 7 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Ventricle): Score 1 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Ventricle): Score 2 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Ventricle): Score 3 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Ventricle): Score 4 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Ventricle): Score 5 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Ventricle): Score 6 | Ability to Maneuver (Left Ventricle): Score 7 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Ventricle): Score 1 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Ventricle): Score 2 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Ventricle): Score 3 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Ventricle): Score 4 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Ventricles): Score 5 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Ventricle): Score 6 | Ability to Maneuver (Right Ventricle): Score 7 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Atrium): Score 1 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Atrium): Score 2 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Atrium): Score 3 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Atrium): Score 4 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Atrium): Score 5 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Atrium): Score 6 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Atrium): Score 7 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Atrium): Score 1 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Atrium): Score 2 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Atrium): Score 3 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Atrium): Score 4 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Atrium): Score 5 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Atrium): Score 6 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Atrium): Score 7 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Ventricle): Score 1 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Ventricle): Score 2 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Ventricle): Score 3 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Ventricle): Score 4 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Ventricle): Score 5 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Ventricle): Score 6 | Ability to Reach Areas (Left Ventricle): Score 7 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Ventricle): Score 1 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Ventricle): Score 2 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Ventricle): Score 3 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Ventricle): Score 4 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Ventricle): Score 5 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Ventricle): Score 6 | Ability to Reach Areas (Right Ventricle): Score 7 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Atrium): Score 1 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Atrium): Score 2 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Atrium): Score 3 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Atrium): Score 4 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Atrium): Score 5 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Atrium): Score 6 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Atrium): Score 7 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Atrium): Score 1 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Atrium): Score 2 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Atrium): Score 3 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Atrium): Score 4 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Atrium): Score 5 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Atrium): Score 6 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Atrium): Score 7 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Ventricle): Score 1 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Ventricle): Score 2 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Ventricle): Score 3 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Ventricle): Score 4 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Ventricle): Score 5 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Ventricle): Score 6 | Ability to Withdraw (Left Ventricle): Score 7 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Ventricle): Score 1 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Ventricle): Score 2 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Ventricle): Score 3 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Ventricle): Score 4 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Ventricle): Score 5 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Ventricle): Score 6 | Ability to Withdraw (Right Ventricle): Score 7 | Insertion/ Withdrawal from Introducer Sheath: Score 1 | Insertion/ Withdrawal from Introducer Sheath: Score 2 | Insertion/ Withdrawal from Introducer Sheath: Score 3 | Insertion/ Withdrawal from Introducer Sheath: Score 4 | Insertion/ Withdrawal from Introducer Sheath: Score 5 | Insertion/ Withdrawal from Introducer Sheath: Score 6 | Insertion/ Withdrawal from Introducer Sheath: Score 7 | Learning Curve: Score 1 | Learning Curve: Score 2 | Learning Curve: Score 3 | Learning Curve: Score 4 | Learning Curve: Score 5 | Learning Curve: Score 6 | Learning Curve: Score 7 | |
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 5 |
Number of responders for physician assessment for pacing (local pacing capture) were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for pacing. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 72 days
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local pacing capture: Score 1 | Local pacing capture: Score 2 | Local pacing capture: Score 3 | Local pacing capture: Score 4 | Local pacing capture: Score 5 | Local pacing capture: Score 6 | Local pacing capture: Score 7 | |
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Number of responders for physician assessment for signal collection and quality were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for signal collection and quality (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 72 days
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 1 | UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 2 | UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 3 | UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 4 | UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 5 | UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 6 | UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 7 | UNIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 1 | UNIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 2 | UNIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 3 | UNIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 4 | UNIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 5 | UNIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 6 | UNIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 7 | UNIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 1 | UNIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 2 | UNIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 3 | UNIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 4 | UNIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 5 | UNIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 6 | UNIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 7 | BIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 1 | BIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 2 | BIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 3 | BIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 4 | BIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 5 | BIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 6 | BIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 7 | BIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 1 | BIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 2 | BIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 3 | BIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 4 | BIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 5 | BIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 6 | BIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 7 | BIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 1 | BIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 2 | BIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 3 | BIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 4 | BIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 5 | BIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 6 | BIPOLAR noise encountered: Score 7 | |
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 15 |
Number of responders for physician assessment for workflow were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for workflow. (NCT04983797)
Timeframe: Up to 72 days
| Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 1 | Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 2 | Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 3 | Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 4 | Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 5 | Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 6 | Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 7 | Time for pre-procedure mapping: Score 1 | Time for pre-procedure mapping: Score 2 | Time for pre-procedure mapping: Score 3 | Time for pre-procedure mapping: Score 4 | Time for pre-procedure mapping: Score 5 | Time for pre-procedure mapping: Score 6 | Time for pre-procedure mapping: Score 7 | Time for post-procedure mapping after standard of care ablation: Score 1 | Time for post-procedure mapping after standard of care ablation: Score 2 | Time for post-procedure mapping after standard of care ablation: Score 3 | Time for post-procedure mapping after standard of care ablation: Score 4 | Time for post-procedure mapping after standard of care ablation: Score 5 | Time for post-procedure mapping after standard of care ablation: Score 6 | Time for post-procedure mapping after standard of care ablation: Score 7 | Ability to identify targets: Score 1 | Ability to identify targets: Score 2 | Ability to identify targets: Score 3 | Ability to identify targets: Score 4 | Ability to identify targets: Score 5 | Ability to identify targets: Score 6 | Ability to identify targets: Score 7 | |
| OPTRELL Mapping Catheter | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 14 |
10 reviews available for procaine and Allergy, Drug
| Article | Year |
|---|---|
Toxicity of local anaesthetics.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacaine; Cardiovascular System; Cocaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Eti | 2003 |
Toxicity of local anaesthetics.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacaine; Cardiovascular System; Cocaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Eti | 2003 |
Toxicity of local anaesthetics.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacaine; Cardiovascular System; Cocaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Eti | 2003 |
Toxicity of local anaesthetics.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacaine; Cardiovascular System; Cocaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Eti | 2003 |
Toxicity of local anaesthetics.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacaine; Cardiovascular System; Cocaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Eti | 2003 |
Toxicity of local anaesthetics.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacaine; Cardiovascular System; Cocaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Eti | 2003 |
Toxicity of local anaesthetics.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacaine; Cardiovascular System; Cocaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Eti | 2003 |
Toxicity of local anaesthetics.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacaine; Cardiovascular System; Cocaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Eti | 2003 |
Toxicity of local anaesthetics.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacaine; Cardiovascular System; Cocaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Eti | 2003 |
[CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF PENICILLIN SHOCK. (CLINICAL AND ANATOMO-PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN 72 FATAL CASES WITH AUTOPSY DRAWN FROM THE LITERATURE)].
Topics: Adolescent; Anaphylaxis; Autopsy; Child; Drug Hypersensitivity; Geriatrics; Infant; Infant, Newborn; | 1964 |
Local anesthetic drugs: tissue and systemic toxicity.
Topics: Anesthesia, Conduction; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Apnea; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Barbiturates; Cent | 1981 |
[Complications at anesthesia in tonsillectomy].
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Hypersensitivity; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intraoperative Complicat | 1999 |
Reactions to injectable local anesthetics. Part IV: Reactions to sulfites in local anesthetics.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Patch Tests; Procaine | 1989 |
Physiology and pharmacology of local anesthetic agents.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Amides; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Bupivacaine; Cardiovascular System; Ce | 1973 |
Local anesthesia. 1.
Topics: Action Potentials; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Cardiovascular System; Cell Membr | 1972 |
Problem overview.
Topics: Analgesia; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthesiology; Burns; Drug Hypersensitivity; Embolism, Air; Epinephr | 1973 |
[Current problems in the prevention of recurrent rheumatic infections in childhood].
Topics: Arthritis, Juvenile; Child; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Penicillin G Benzathine; Penicillins; Pro | 1967 |
[N-(gamma-(4-phenoxymethylphenyl)propyl)-morpholine--a new surface anesthetic of remarkable tolerance. 6. Report on the syntheses of new compounds with local anethetic effect. 1].
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Autonomic Nervous System; Bacteria; Blood Pre | 1968 |
3 trials available for procaine and Allergy, Drug
| Article | Year |
|---|---|
Comparison of compounds used for intradermal anesthesia.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Benzyl Alcohols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Hypers | 1976 |
Elevated plasma procaine concentrations after administration of procaine penicillin G.
Topics: Chromatography, Gas; Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug Stability; Female; Gonorrhea; Hematocrit; Humans; H | 1974 |
[Drug side-effects from the pharmacological viewpoint].
Topics: Acetates; Aminosalicylic Acids; Animals; Anticoagulants; Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug-Related Side Ef | 1969 |
87 other studies available for procaine and Allergy, Drug
| Article | Year |
|---|---|
[Local Allergic Reaction to Subcutaneous Treatment with Procaine in a Patient with Shoulder Pain - a Case Study].
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Musc | 2018 |
An unanticipated allergic reaction to a hypnotic suggestion for anesthesia: a brief communication and commentary.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Procaine; Suggestion | 2013 |
Allergy to local anesthetics of the amide group with tolerance to procaine.
Topics: Amides; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Hypersensitivity, Immediate; Midd | 2003 |
Allergy to procaine hydrochloride with three fatalities.
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Im | 1953 |
Procaine allergy in dental patients: diagnosis and management; a preliminary report.
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Hypersensitivity; Immune System Diseases; Procaine | 1953 |
[A case of hypersensitivity to procaine penicillin].
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Hypersensitivity; Immune Sys | 1953 |
Procaine hydrochloride allergy in regional anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthesia, Conduction; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Immune System Diseases; Pro | 1954 |
Penicillin allergy.
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Hypersensitivity; Penicillins; Procaine | 1956 |
Penicillin allergy.
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Hypersensitivity; Penicillins; Procaine | 1956 |
Penicillin allergy.
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Hypersensitivity; Penicillins; Procaine | 1956 |
Penicillin allergy.
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Hypersensitivity; Penicillins; Procaine | 1956 |
Studies on procaine allergy with reference to urticaria due to procaine penicillin treatment. B. The medical uses of procaine and reactions due to procaine penicillin. Review of the literature.
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Penicillin G Procaine; Penicillins; Procaine; Urticaria | 1960 |
Studies on procaine allergy with reference to urticaria due to procaine penicillin treatment. C. Reactions following procaine due to direct skin contact or injection. Hypersensitivity to procaine as an expression of cross-sensitization. Effects of procain
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Penicillin G Procaine; Penicillins; Procaine; Skin; | 1960 |
Studies on procaine allergy with reference to urticaria due to procaine penicillin treatment. D. Serologic and skin tests and their clinical value in penicillin allergy. Review of the literature.
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Penicillin G Procaine; Penicillins; Procaine; Skin | 1960 |
Studies on procaine allergy with reference to urticaria due to procaine penicillin treatment. A. The most common types of reactions in penicillin treatment and a review of literature on the incidence of reactions.
Topics: Drug Eruptions; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Incidence; Penicillin G Procaine; Penicillins; Procai | 1959 |
Studies on procaine allergy with reference to urticaria due to procaine pencillin treatment.
Topics: Dermatitis, Contact; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Penicillins; Procaine; Urticaria | 1962 |
[General toxic syndromes caused by local anesthetics].
Topics: Anesthetics; Anesthetics, Local; Cardiovascular Agents; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Lidocaine; Pr | 1963 |
[SHOCK-LIKE SYMPTOMS CAUSED BY DRUGS AND THEIR TREATMENT. (1) BASIC PRINCIPLES].
Topics: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Aminosalicylic Acid; Aminosalicylic Acids; Anaphylaxis; Anti-Bacterial | 1963 |
[CASES OF SHOCK-LIKE CONDITIONS. (2)].
Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Chloramphenicol; Cocaine; Cyanosis; | 1963 |
[CASES OF SHOCK-LIKE CONDITIONS. (3) CLINICAL CASES OF SHOCK-LIKE CONDITIONS CAUSED BY DRUGS].
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Drug Hypersensitivity; Lidocaine; Otolaryngology; Penicillins; Procaine; Shock; S | 1963 |
[CASES OF SHOCK-LIKE CONDITIONS. (4)].
Topics: Anaphylaxis; Anesthesia; Anesthesia, General; Child; Drug Hypersensitivity; Ether; Otolaryngology; P | 1963 |
[CASE OF SUCCESSFUL TREATMENT OF SHOCK IN TONSILLECTOMY AND MEASURES FOR PREVENTING IT].
Topics: Blood Sedimentation; Blood Transfusion; Caffeine; Cyanosis; Drug Hypersensitivity; Electrocardiograp | 1963 |
[5 RECENT CASES OF LOCAL ANESTHETIC TOXICITY IN TONSILLECTOMY].
Topics: Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Cocaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Lidocaine; Pharmacolog | 1963 |
BACTERIAL MENINGITIS. III. INFECTIONS CAUSED BY STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS.
Topics: Central Nervous System Diseases; Chloramphenicol; Chlortetracycline; Drug Hypersensitivity; Erythrom | 1964 |
[CLINICAL ASPECTS AND THERAPY OF STATES OF ALLERGIC AND ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK].
Topics: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Anaphylaxis; Contrast Media; Drug Hypersensitivity; Iodized Oil; Penici | 1964 |
METHICILLIN TOLERANCE AFTER PENICILLIN G ANAPHYLAXIS.
Topics: Anaphylaxis; Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug Tolerance; Immune Tolerance; Methicillin; Penicillin G; Pen | 1964 |
DIPHENHYDRAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE (BENADRYL) AS A LOCAL ANESTHETIC IN PROCAINE AND LIDOCAINE SENSITIVE PATIENTS.
Topics: Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics; Anesthetics, Local; Diphenhydramine; Drug Hypers | 1964 |
[COMBINED ANAPHYLACTIC AND EMBOLIC-TOXIC REACTION CAUSED BY THE ACCIDENTAL INTRAVASCULAR INJECTION OF PROCAINE PENICILLIN].
Topics: Anaphylaxis; Diagnosis; Drug Hypersensitivity; Embolism; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Injectio | 1964 |
[DEATH DUE TO PENICILLIN. 16 DANISH CASES WITH AUTOPSIES].
Topics: Anaphylaxis; Asthma; Autopsy; Death; Denmark; Drug Hypersensitivity; Penicillin G; Penicillin G Proc | 1965 |
The effect of procaine immune serum upon cutaneous allergy to procaine.
Topics: Dermatitis, Atopic; Drug Hypersensitivity; Hypersensitivity; Immune Sera; Procaine | 1950 |
[Paroxysmal tachycardia and procaine allergy].
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Procaine; Tachycardia; Tachycardia, Paroxysmal | 1952 |
Allergy to procaine amide.
Topics: Drug Eruptions; Drug Hypersensitivity; Hypersensitivity; Immune System Diseases; Procainamide; Proca | 1952 |
Use of preservative-free lidocaine for cataract surgery in a patient allergic to "caines".
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Cataract Extraction; Drug Hypersensi | 2005 |
Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Carticaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Procaine; Vasoconstrictor Agents | 2006 |
Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Carticaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Procaine; Vasoconstrictor Agents | 2006 |
Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Carticaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Procaine; Vasoconstrictor Agents | 2006 |
Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Carticaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Procaine; Vasoconstrictor Agents | 2006 |
Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Carticaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Procaine; Vasoconstrictor Agents | 2006 |
Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Carticaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Procaine; Vasoconstrictor Agents | 2006 |
Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Carticaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Procaine; Vasoconstrictor Agents | 2006 |
Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Carticaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Procaine; Vasoconstrictor Agents | 2006 |
Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Carticaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Procaine; Vasoconstrictor Agents | 2006 |
Hypersensitivity to procaine, tetracaine, mepivacaine, and methylparaben: report of a case.
Topics: Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Mepivacaine; Middle A | 1983 |
[Toxic and allergic reactions to local anesthetics].
Topics: Bupivacaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Lidocaine; Procaine | 1984 |
A unique case of grand mal seizures after fluress.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Chlorobutanol; Drug Combinations; Drug Hypersensitivity; Edetic Acid; Epi | 1981 |
Cholinesterase deficiency.
Topics: Anesthetics; Anesthetics, Local; Cholinesterases; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Procaine; Propanidi | 1983 |
Dyclonine hydrochloride for airway anesthesia: awake endotracheal intubation in a patient with suspected local anesthetic allergy.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Intubation, Intratrac | 1997 |
[Complications of local anesthetics].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Cocaine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Hypersensitivity; F | 1976 |
[A study of allergy to local anesthetics using the lymphoblast transformation test].
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Chemical Phenomena; Chemistry; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Lid | 1976 |
Assessment of allergy to local anesthetics.
Topics: Adolescent; Amides; Anaphylaxis; Anesthetics, Local; Antigen-Antibody Complex; Arthus Reaction; Chem | 1979 |
Relationship between pulmonary embolism, airway obstruction and hypersensitivity of the airways in dogs: influence of partial vagus nerve blockade.
Topics: Acetylcholine; Airway Obstruction; Airway Resistance; Animals; Blood Gas Analysis; Dogs; Drug Hypers | 1977 |
Pseudoanaphylactic reactions with procaine penicillin.
Topics: Anaphylaxis; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug Hypersensitivity; Gonorrhea; Humans; Penicillin G Procain | 1976 |
Adverse reactions to topical ocular anesthetics.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics; Anesthetics, Local; Cocaine; Cornea; Drug Hypersensitivity; Ed | 1976 |
Letter: Allergy to procaine and mepivacaine.
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Mepivacaine; Procaine | 1975 |
Letter: Local anesthetics.
Topics: Anesthetics, Local; Diphenhydramine; Drug Hypersensitivity; Procaine; Tripelennamine | 1975 |
[Allergic lesions of the myocardium in drug intolerance].
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Autoantibodies; Bacterial Vaccines; Drug Hypersensitivity; | 1975 |
[The diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity].
Topics: Adult; Diagnostic Errors; Dipyrone; Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Tolerance | 1990 |
Considerations in differential diagnosis of adverse reactions to local anesthetic: report of case.
Topics: Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthesia, Local; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Human | 1986 |
Provocative challenge with local anesthetics in patients with a prior history of reaction.
Topics: Anaphylaxis; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Intradermal Tests; Lidocaine; Procai | 1987 |
Local anesthesia. Implications for the perioperative nurse.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Documentation; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; | 1987 |
[Complications of regional anaesthesia and their treatment (author's transl)].
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anesthesia, Local; Apnea; Barbiturates; Bradycardia; Bupivacaine; Diagnosis | 1973 |
[On allergic skin reactions due to jenacaine (novocaine) in tonsillectomy].
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Drug Eruptions; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Male; Procaine; Tonsillecto | 1967 |
Latent co-sensitizations in drug allergy. Pathogenic role; therapeutic importance.
Topics: Angioedema; Bacteria; Blood Protein Disorders; Cryoglobulins; Desensitization, Immunologic; Drug Eru | 1967 |
[Advantages of neuroleptic analgesia in arteriographic studies (experiences with Thalamonal)].
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Angiography; Apnea; Benperidol; Blood Pressure; Drug Eruptions; Drug Hypers | 1971 |
[Role of different factors in the provocation of occupational eczema in miners].
Topics: Aminopyrine; Aniline Compounds; Chromium; Dermatitis, Contact; Dermatitis, Occupational; Drug Hypers | 1970 |
[Nil nocere: The blockade of the stellate ganglion and its dangers].
Topics: Autonomic Nerve Block; Blood Coagulation Disorders; Drug Hypersensitivity; Esophagus; Ganglionic Blo | 1970 |
Data regarding the problem of physical allergies.
Topics: Acetylcholine; Acetylcholinesterase; Adolescent; Adult; Antibodies; Atropine; Chlorpromazine; Cold T | 1970 |
[Polyvalent drug hypersensitivity].
Topics: Alcohols; Aminocaproates; Anesthesia, General; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Appendectomy; Drug Hypersensit | 1974 |
Sensitivity to local anaesthetic.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Local; Benzoates; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Lid | 1972 |
Drug information: questions and answers.
Topics: Aged; Ampicillin; Contraceptives, Oral; Diuretics; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Food Analysis; Gua | 1974 |
A case of lignocaine hypersensitivity.
Topics: Adolescent; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Nasal Mucosa; Procaine; Skin Tests; Ur | 1973 |
[Iatrogenic lesion in ophthalmologic anesthesia].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics; Anesthetics, Local; Atropine; Blin | 1972 |
[An unusual case of novocaine poisoning].
Topics: Adult; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Male; Procaine; Tachycardia, Paroxysmal | 1972 |
[Catamnestic study of hypersensitivity to procaine and various immunologically related substances].
Topics: Aniline Compounds; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Procaine; Skin Tests; Sulfonamides; Tuberculin | 1973 |
[Cross reactions between chloramphenicol and para groups].
Topics: Aniline Compounds; Biphenyl Compounds; Chloramphenicol; Cross Reactions; Drug Hypersensitivity; Huma | 1972 |
[Severe allergic reaction after intravenous injection of procaine in patients with asthma].
Topics: Adult; Anaphylaxis; Asthma; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Procaine | 1972 |
Evaluation of patients with history of allergy to local anesthetic drugs.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Lidocaine | 1971 |
Local anaesthetics.
Topics: Amides; Anesthetics, Local; Brain Edema; Cardiovascular Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; C | 1971 |
[Allergy to methylmethacrylate, procaine and other local anesthetics].
Topics: Acrylic Resins; Anesthetics, Local; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Procaine; Skin Tests | 1971 |
Atypical cholinesterase activity: its importance in dentistry.
Topics: Adult; Cholinesterases; Drug Hypersensitivity; Enzymes; Female; Humans; Metabolism, Inborn Errors; P | 1966 |
[Allergic skin reactions to topical anesthetics in patients with bronchial asthma].
Topics: Asthma; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Lidocaine; Procaine; Skin Tests | 1971 |
[Drug allergy].
Topics: Adult; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Military Medicine; Procaine; USSR | 1969 |
Verification of proved procaine allergy by the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT).
Topics: Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Lectins; Lymphocyte Activation; Lymphocytes; Mitosis; Procaine | 1969 |
[Analysis of drug induced exanthemas from material of the dermatological clinic in Bratislava during 1957-1967].
Topics: Adult; Aminopyrine; Analgesics; Barbiturates; Chloramphenicol; Drug Hypersensitivity; Exanthema; Fem | 1970 |
Hypnotic treatment of a novocain allergy.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Dental; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Hypnosis; Hypnosis, Dental; Procai | 1970 |
[Contraindications of the i.v. procaine therapy in geriatrics].
Topics: Aged; Drug Hypersensitivity; Geriatrics; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Procaine | 1971 |
[Allergy to drugs].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aspirin; Child; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Penicillins; | 1971 |
[A case of anaphylactic shock after penicillin and novocain injection].
Topics: Adult; Anaphylaxis; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Male; Penicillins; Procaine; Skin Tests | 1967 |
[Occupational drug allergy].
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug Industry; Female; Hormones; Humans; Male; Occupat | 1967 |
Abnormal reaction to procaine and succinylcholine in a patient with inherited atypical plasma cholinesterase: case report.
Topics: Abdomen; Adjuvants, Anesthesia; Adult; Anesthesia, Local; Apnea; Cholinesterases; Drug Hypersensitiv | 1968 |
[Verification of established procaine allergy by the method of cultured lymphoycte stimulation].
Topics: Culture Media; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Lectins; Lymphocytes; Mitosis; Procaine; Skin Tests | 1968 |
[Usefulness of the electrodermatometric method (EDM) for the determination of procaine allergy].
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Galvanic Skin Response; Humans; Male; Method | 1969 |
Effect of concentration of solutions of various penicillin G types upon the leukocyte agglutination test.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Hypersensitivity; Hemagglutination; Hemagglutination Tests | 1969 |
[Test for drug sensitization in patients with cerebral stroke].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Hemiplegia; Humans; Lidocaine | 1969 |
[The use of bencaine in opthalmology].
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Drug Hypersensitivity; Eye Diseases; Female; Hum | 1969 |
Allergy to local anesthetics.
Topics: Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics; Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug Tolerance; Humans; Penicillins; Procaine | 1969 |
[A case of acute poisoning by novocaine in paranephric block].
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Conduction; Blindness; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Procaine | 1965 |
[Studies on group allergies of aromatic amino compounds. Test results on so-called "para group" allergies].
Topics: Aminobenzoates; Aniline Compounds; Azo Compounds; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Occupational Diseas | 1966 |