prinomastat has been researched along with Carcinoma--Non-Small-Cell-Lung* in 4 studies
1 review(s) available for prinomastat and Carcinoma--Non-Small-Cell-Lung
Article | Year |
---|---|
[New prospects in the treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): new biological factors].
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Epidermal Growth Factor; ErbB Receptors; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Metalloendopeptidases; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Organic Chemicals; Paclitaxel; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research; Time Factors | 2001 |
2 trial(s) available for prinomastat and Carcinoma--Non-Small-Cell-Lung
Article | Year |
---|---|
Phase III study of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor prinomastat in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) degrade extracellular proteins and facilitate tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. This trial was undertaken to determine the effect of prinomastat, an inhibitor of selected MMPs, on the survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), when given in combination with gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy.. Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomly assigned to receive prinomastat 15 mg or placebo twice daily orally continuously, in combination with gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1, every 21 days for up to six cycles. The planned sample size was 420 patients.. Study results at an interim analysis and lack of efficacy in another phase III trial prompted early closure of this study. There were 362 patients randomized (181 on prinomastat and 181 on placebo). One hundred thirty-four patients had stage IIIB disease with T4 primary tumor, 193 had stage IV disease, and 34 had recurrent disease (one enrolled patient was ineligible with stage IIIA disease). Overall response rates for the two treatment arms were similar (27% for prinomastat v 26% for placebo; P = .81). There was no difference in overall survival or time to progression; for prinomastat versus placebo patients, the median overall survival times were 11.5 versus 10.8 months (P = .82), 1-year survival rates were 43% v 38% (P = .45), and progression-free survival times were 6.1 v 5.5 months (P = .11), respectively. The toxicities of prinomastat were arthralgia, stiffness, and joint swelling. Treatment interruption was required in 38% of prinomastat patients and 12% of placebo patients.. Prinomastat does not improve the outcome of chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors; Middle Aged; Organic Chemicals; Protease Inhibitors | 2005 |
Venous thromboembolism among patients with advanced lung cancer randomized to prinomastat or placebo, plus chemotherapy.
Two clinical trials have suggested that the combination of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor with chemotherapy is associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). This retrospective cohort study investigates whether a similar association exists when matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (prinomastat) is combined with chemotherapy. Patients (n=1,023) with stage IIIB, IV, or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were followed during 2 randomized, double-blind trials of prinomastat versus placebo orally bid, plus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) or paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC). VTE included deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) confirmed by imaging or autopsy. Risks identified in univariate analysis (incidence densities compared by t test) were confirmed in multivariate analysis (proportional hazards model). During 7,500.3 patient-months, 58 VTE (31 PE, 27 isolated DVT) were confirmed in 54 patients. On univariate analysis, VTE was associated with central venous catheter placed within 3 months, 15 mg prinomastat plus GC, and to a lesser extent, 15 mg prinomastat plus PC, baseline performance status, and histologic type. VTE incidence was not increased by 15 mg prinomastat alone (post-discontinuation of chemotherapy), by chemotherapy plus placebo, or by 5 or 10 mg prinomastat plus chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis,VTE hazards (95% confidence interval) were 5.69 (2.61, 12.40) with recently placed central catheter, 2.78 (1.42, 5.43) with 15 mg prinomastat plus GC, and 2.06 (0.98, 4.31) with 15 mg prinomastat plus PC; performance status and histology were nonsignificant. We can conclude that combined treatment with 15 mg prinomastat plus chemotherapy approximately doubles the hazard of VTE among patients with advanced NSCLC. Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors; Middle Aged; Organic Chemicals; Placebos; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis | 2003 |
1 other study(ies) available for prinomastat and Carcinoma--Non-Small-Cell-Lung
Article | Year |
---|---|
Marked antiangiogenic and antitumor efficacy of AG3340 in chemoresistant human non-small cell lung cancer tumors: single agent and combination chemotherapy studies.
Effective therapy is needed to improve the survival of patients with advanced lung cancers. We studied the effects of a selective metalloprotease inhibitor, AG3340, on chemoresistant human non-small cell lung cancer tumors (line MV522) in vivo. Mice bearing s.c. tumors were given twice-daily oral doses of AG3340. As a single agent, AG3340 inhibited angiogenesis (up to 77%) and tumor growth (up to 65%) in a dose-dependent manner at well-tolerated daily doses up to 400 mg/kg/day and induced significant tumor necrosis. In contrast, tumors were relatively insensitive to carboplatin with approximately 25% growth inhibition observed at a maximum tolerated dose of approximately 30 mg/kg/week (given i.p., twice weekly). Carboplatin inhibited tumor growth markedly only at toxic doses, demonstrating a superior therapeutic index of AG3340 to carboplatin in this tumor model. A suboptimal dose of AG3340, when used in combination with an ineffective maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin, resulted in greater tumor growth inhibitions than those produced by either agent alone. Similarly, growth inhibition was enhanced when AG3340 was used in combination with paclitaxel. Cotreatment with carboplatin did not alter AG3340 plasma concentrations achieved acutely after oral dosing. These data demonstrate an antiangiogenic and antitumor effect of AG3340 when used as a single agent and enhanced growth inhibitions when AG3340 is used in combination with cytotoxic agents. These data suggest that treatment with this novel matrix metalloprotease inhibitor may be beneficial in advanced lung cancers and other chemoresistant malignancies. Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Nude; Neoplasm Transplantation; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Organic Chemicals; Paclitaxel; Transplantation, Heterologous; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Cells, Cultured | 1999 |