pregabalin and Neoplasms

Topics: Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Humans; Morphine; Neoplasms; Pain, Postoperative; Pregabalin

Opioids are the primary choice for managing chronic cancer pain. However, many nonopioid therapies are currently prescribed for chronic cancer pain with little published evidence comparing their efficacy.. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any systemic pharmaceutical intervention and/or combination thereof in treating chronic cancer pain. The primary outcome was global efficacy reported as an odds ratio (OR). The secondary outcome was change in pain intensity reported as a standardized mean difference (SMD).. We included 81 RCTs consisting of 10,003 patients investigating 11 medication classes. Most RCTs (80%) displayed low risk of bias. The top-ranking classes for global efficacy were nonopioid analgesics (network OR, 0.30; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.13 to 0.67), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (network OR, 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.22 to 0.90), and opioids (network OR, 0.49; 95% CrI, 0.27 to 0.86), whereas the top-ranked interventions were lidocaine (network OR, 0.04; 95% CrI, 0.01 to 0.18; surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis [SUCRA] score, 98.1), codeine plus aspirin (network OR, 0.22; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.63; SUCRA score, 81.1), and pregabalin (network OR, 0.29; 95% CrI, 0.08 to 0.92; SUCRA score, 73.8). In terms of reducing pain intensity, we found that no class was superior to placebo, whereas the following top-ranked interventions were superior to placebo: ziconotide (network SMD, -24.98; 95% CrI, -32.62 to -17.35; SUCRA score, 99.8), dezocine (network SMD, -13.56; 95% CrI, -23.37 to -3.69; SUCRA score, 93.5), and diclofenac (network SMD, -11.22; 95% CrI, -15.91 to -5.80; SUCRA score, 92.9).. There are significant differences in efficacy among current regimens for chronic cancer pain. Our evidence suggests that certain nonopioid analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can serve as effectively as opioids in managing chronic cancer pain.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Aspirin; Bayes Theorem; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Cancer Pain; Chronic Pain; Codeine; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Diclofenac; Female; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Odds Ratio; omega-Conotoxins; Pregabalin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tetrahydronaphthalenes; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Neuropathic pain is caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory system, including peripheral fibres (Aβ, Aδ and C fibres) and central neurons, and affects 7-10% of the general population. Multiple causes of neuropathic pain have been described and its incidence is likely to increase owing to the ageing global population, increased incidence of diabetes mellitus and improved survival from cancer after chemotherapy. Indeed, imbalances between excitatory and inhibitory somatosensory signalling, alterations in ion channels and variability in the way that pain messages are modulated in the central nervous system all have been implicated in neuropathic pain. The burden of chronic neuropathic pain seems to be related to the complexity of neuropathic symptoms, poor outcomes and difficult treatment decisions. Importantly, quality of life is impaired in patients with neuropathic pain owing to increased drug prescriptions and visits to health care providers, as well as the morbidity from the pain itself and the inciting disease. Despite challenges, progress in the understanding of the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain is spurring the development of new diagnostic procedures and personalized interventions, which emphasize the need for a multidisciplinary approach to the management of neuropathic pain.

Topics: Amines; Analgesics; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Lidocaine; Narcotics; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Nociceptive Pain; Pain Management; Pregabalin; Quality of Life; Tramadol; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation; Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers

The oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) contributes to tumour growth, but the precise contribution of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD), the third enzyme in this pathway, to tumorigenesis remains unclear. We found that suppression of 6PGD decreased lipogenesis and RNA biosynthesis and elevated ROS levels in cancer cells, attenuating cell proliferation and tumour growth. 6PGD-mediated production of ribulose-5-phosphate (Ru-5-P) inhibits AMPK activation by disrupting the active LKB1 complex, thereby activating acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 and lipogenesis. Ru-5-P and NADPH are thought to be precursors in RNA biosynthesis and lipogenesis, respectively; thus, our findings provide an additional link between the oxidative PPP and lipogenesis through Ru-5-P-dependent inhibition of LKB1-AMPK signalling. Moreover, we identified and developed 6PGD inhibitors, physcion and its derivative S3, that effectively inhibited 6PGD, cancer cell proliferation and tumour growth in nude mice xenografts without obvious toxicity, suggesting that 6PGD could be an anticancer target.

Topics: AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases; AMP-Activated Protein Kinases; Humans; Lipogenesis; Neoplasms; Oxidative Stress; Pentose Phosphate Pathway; Phosphogluconate Dehydrogenase; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Ribulosephosphates; Signal Transduction

To systematically identify and appraise the current literature of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain resulting from cancer or cancer treatment.. A systematic review of the literature was conducted based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.. Studies reporting pregabalin data for adult (>18 years) patients with cancer experiencing neuropathic pain due to cancer or cancer treatment/surgery were considered eligible for inclusion.. A literature search was conducted in PubMed on February 22, 2012 using the following search terms: "neuropath* AND pain AND cancer OR oncology OR tumor OR tumour AND pregabalin." Open access journals were also searched. Abstracts were screened and reviewed for eligibility based on predetermined criteria for inclusion. Data reporting pain intensity, pain interference, quality of life, symptom quality and intensity, global impression of change, treatment satisfaction, and adverse effects were the predefined factors for analysis. Data were summarized descriptively due to variations in study outcome measures.. Five articles were eligible for inclusion; one double-blind National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria controlled trial, one single-arm open-label study, two observational analyses, and one case report.. There were limited published data reporting efficacy and safety outcomes for pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain in adult patients with cancer. Due to limitations within the studies included in this review, it is not possible to draw any conclusions on the descriptive summary of pregabalin for the treatment of cancer-related neuropathic pain, and further studies are required.

Topics: Analgesics; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Pregabalin

Neuropathic pain is usually considered an "hard pain" both for the intrinsic difficulties in a correct diagnosis, and for the modest efficacy of the most part of conventional treatments. The most frequently used drugs in clinical practice are tricyclic antidepressants and anticonvulsants, while a minor role is reserved to NSAIDs or to strong opiates. Aim of our work was to systematically analyze all the evidences of literature about the treatment options against neuropathic pain in oncology, focusing our attention upon the efficacy and the safety of the different therapeutic options assessed as Number-Needed-to-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH). A critical analysis of literature was finally performed using the GRADE system. On the basis of our review and the NNT and NNH ratio, gabapentin, pregabalin and strong opiates seem to be the most effective and well tolerated options against neuropathic pain in oncology, while carbamazepine, amitryptiline, tramadol and NSAIDs do not seem to be valid options in front line approach against oncologic neuropathic pain, either for a minor efficacy or for an unfavorable safety profile. Further trials comparing the different effective options are needed to better define the correct approach against neuropathic pain in oncology.

Topics: Amines; Amitriptyline; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Carbamazepine; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Pregabalin; Tramadol; Treatment Outcome

Management of neuropathic cancer pain (NCP) refractory to regular opioids remains an important challenge. The efficacy of pregabalin for NCP except chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) has already been confirmed in two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) compared with placebo. Duloxetine offers the potential of analgesia in opioid refractory NCP. However, there are no RCT of duloxetine for the management of opioid-refractory NCP as a first line treatment. Both classes of drugs have the potential to reduce NCP, but there has been no head-to-head comparison for the efficacy and safety, especially given differing side effect profiles.. An international, multicentre, double-blind, dose increment, parallel-arm, RCT is planned. Inclusion criteria include: adults with cancer experiencing NCP refractory to opioids; Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-item 3 (worst pain) of ≥4; Neuropathic Pain on the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale of ≥12 despite of an adequate trial of regular opioid medication (≥60 mg/day oral morphine equivalent dose). Patients with CIPN are excluded.The study will recruit from palliative care teams (both inpatients and outpatients) in Japan and Australia. Participants will be randomised (1:1 allocation ratio) to duloxetine or pregabalin arm. Dose escalation is until day 14 and from day 14 to 21 is a dose de-escalation period to avoid withdrawal effects. The primary endpoint is defined as the mean difference in BPI item 3 for worst pain intensity over the previous 24 hours at day 14 between groups. A sample size of 160 patients will be enrolled between February 2020 and March 2023.. Ethics approval was obtained at Osaka City University Hospital Certified Review Board and South Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in international journals and the key findings presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: jRCTs051190097, ACTRN12620000656932.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Cancer Pain; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Pregabalin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the efficacy and the safety of pregabalin (PGB)-morphine combination for the treatment of neuropathic cancer pain (NCP).. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo (PL)-controlled crossover study, 40 cancer patients with severe NCP were randomized into two groups (20 per group): PGB-PL and PL-PGB. Patients in the PGB-PL group received PGB plus oral morphine in phase I, and PL plus oral morphine in phase II. The treatment sequence for the PL-PGB group was PL plus oral morphine in phase I, and PGB plus oral morphine in phase II. These 2-week treatment periods were separated by a 1-week washout period. The primary outcome measure was the decrements in morphine dose; secondary outcomes included quantitative assessments of sleep (rated according to the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale), the Constipation Assessment Scale and adverse effects.. The mean minimal effective dose of morphine was 184.4 ± 69.9 mg/day in the period of PGB treatments, which was significantly lower than that of PL-controls (228.7 ± 66.9 mg/day; P < 0.001) and baseline (247.5 ± 80.0 mg/day; P < 0.001). Compared with PL, PGB resulted in a significant sleep improvement as measured by sleep disturbance, sleep quantity, and sleep problems index (P < 0.001), as well as a Constipation Assessment Scale reduction (P < 0.001). PGB resulted in a higher frequency of dry mouth and somnolence than PL (P < 0.05).. PGB enhances the efficacy of oral morphine and reduces dose-related adverse reactions. The PGB-morphine combination is an effective approach to controlling NCP.

Topics: Analgesics; Cancer Pain; Cross-Over Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Pain Management; Pregabalin; Treatment Outcome

Paclitaxel can cause an acute pain syndrome (P-APS), considered to be an acute form of neuropathy and chronic chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Anecdotal reports suggested that gabapentin may be helpful in the prevention of these toxicities. The purpose of this pilot study was to obtain data to support or refute the utility of pregabalin for the prevention of P-APS and CIPN.. Patients scheduled to receive weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)/dose) were randomized 1:1 to receive pregabalin 75 mg or a placebo, twice daily, during the 12 weeks of chemotherapy. Patients completed the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ) CIPN20 questionnaire at baseline, prior to each dose of paclitaxel and monthly for 6 months post-treatment. Patients completed a post-paclitaxel questionnaire for 6 days after each dose of paclitaxel and an acute pain syndrome symptom questionnaire on day 8. The primary end point was to determine the effect of pregabalin on the maximum of the worst acute pain scores for the week following paclitaxel administration for cycle 1.. Forty-six patients were randomly assigned to the treatment or placebo arm. There was no suggestion of a difference between the two study arms with regard to P-APS measures. While there was a suggestion that pregabalin decreased numbness, there was no suggestion that it decreased tingling, pain, or the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 subscale scores. There were no evident toxicity differences between the two study arms.. The results of this pilot trial do not support that pregabalin is helpful for preventing P-APS or paclitaxel-associated CIPN.

Topics: Acute Pain; Adult; Aged; Amines; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Female; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Hypesthesia; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Paclitaxel; Paresthesia; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Pilot Projects; Placebos; Pregabalin; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires

Cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) affects one third of patients with cancer. Radiotherapy remains the gold-standard treatment; however, laboratory and clinical work suggest that pregabalin may be useful in treating CIBP. The aim of this study was to examine pregabalin in patients with CIBP receiving radiotherapy.. A multicenter, double-blind randomized trial of pregabalin versus placebo was conducted. Eligible patients were age ≥ 18 years, had radiologically proven bone metastases, were scheduled to receive radiotherapy, and had pain scores ≥ 4 of 10 (on 0-to-10 numeric rating scale). Before radiotherapy, baseline assessments were completed, followed by random assignment. Doses of pregabalin and placebo were increased over 4 weeks. The primary end point was treatment response, defined as a reduction of ≥ 2 points in worst pain by week 4, accompanied by a stable or reduced opioid dose, compared with baseline. Secondary end points assessed average pain, interference of pain with activity, breakthrough pain, mood, quality of life, and adverse events.. A total of 233 patients were randomly assigned: 117 to placebo and 116 to pregabalin. The most common cancers were prostate (n = 88; 38%), breast (n = 77; 33%), and lung (n = 42; 18%). In the pregabalin arm, 45 patients (38.8%) achieved the primary end point, compared with 47 (40.2%) in the placebo arm (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.81; P = .816). There were no statistically significant differences in average pain, pain interference, or quality of life between arms. There were differences in mood (P = .031) and breakthrough pain duration (P = .037) between arms. Outcomes were compared at 4 weeks.. Our findings do not support the role of pregabalin in patients with CIBP receiving radiotherapy. The role of pregabalin in CIBP with a clinical neuropathic pain component is unknown.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Affect; Aged; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid; Bone and Bones; Breakthrough Pain; Chemoradiotherapy; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pain Management; Pain Measurement; Palliative Care; Pregabalin; Quality of Life

Neuropathic cancer pain (NCP) is a common manifestation of cancer and/or its treatment. Treatment following the WHO analgesic ladder provides relief for the majority of cancer pain patients; however, concern remains that opioids may be less efficacious for neuropathic pain (NP) compared with nociceptive pain, often necessitating the use of higher doses. Adjuvants, such as pregabalin, have shown to be efficacious for the treatment of NP, although data come mostly from noncancer studies. The comparative efficacy and safety of opioids versus adjuvants has not been studied for NCP. The aim of this study was to directly compare pregabalin versus a strong opioid for the treatment of NCP.. A total of 120 patients, diagnosed with "definite" NCP, were randomized into two groups and received increasing doses of either oral pregabalin or transdermal fentanyl for 28 days. VAS score, patient satisfaction, need for opioid rescue, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded.. In the pregabalin group, a significantly higher proportion of patients achieved at least 30% reduction in VAS compared with the fentanyl group (73.3%, 95% CI: 60.3%-83.93 vs. 36.7%, 95% CI: 24.5%-50.1%, P < 0.0001, respectively), while the percentage mean change from baseline was also significantly different [46% (95% CI: 39.5%-52.8%) for pregabalin and 22% (95% CI: 14.9%-29.5%) for fentanyl (P < 0.0001)]. Patient-reported satisfaction was more frequent with pregabalin, while AEs and treatment discontinuations were more frequent in the fentanyl group.. Prompt use of a neuropathic pain-specific adjuvant, such as pregabalin, in NCP may lead to better control of the neuropathic component, with opioid-sparing effects.

Topics: Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Female; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Pain Measurement; Pregabalin; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Neuropathic pain is commonly associated with cancer. Current treatments include combination opioid and adjuvant therapies, but no guidelines are available for dose escalation strategies. This phase II study compared the efficacy and tolerability of two dose escalation strategies for oxycodone and pregabalin combination therapy.. Patients (N = 75) with oncological neuropathic pain, previously untreated with pregabalin, were recruited in 5 Italian institutions between 2007 and 2010. Patients were randomised to two different dose escalation strategies (arm A; N = 38) oxycodone at a fixed dose with increasing pregabalin doses; (arm B; N = 37) pregabalin at a fixed dose with increasing oxycodone doses. Patients were evaluated from daily diaries and follow-ups at 3, 7, 10, and 14 days after beginning treatment with a numerical rating scale (NRS), neuropathic pain scale (SDN), and well-being scale (ESAS). The primary endpoint was a ≥1/3 reduction in pain (NRS); secondary endpoints included the time to analgesia and adverse effects. The study had a 90% probability of detecting the best strategy for a true difference of at least 15%.. More patients in arm A (76%) than arm B (64%) achieved ≥1/3 overall pain reduction even after controlling for baseline factors (gender, baseline pain). Group A reported fewer side effects than group B; constipation 52.8% vs. 66.7%; nausea: 27.8% vs. 44.4%; drowsiness: 44.4% vs. 55.6%; confusion: 16.7% vs. 27.8%; itching: 8.3% vs. 19.4%.. Both strategies effectively controlled neuropathic pain, but according to the adopted selection design arm A is preferable to arm B for pain control.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00637975.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Oxycodone; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Pregabalin; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the opioid response in patients receiving morphine and pregabalin, independently from the presumed pain mechanisms, in comparison with patients receiving morphine treatment only.. A multicenter prospective randomized controlled study was carried out in a sample of 70 advanced cancer patients with pain requiring strong opioids. Thirty-five patients (group MO) were randomized to receive sustained-release morphine using initial doses of 60 mg/day. Thirty-five patients (group MO-PR) were randomized to start the same morphine doses and pregabalin in increasing doses, starting with 25 mg/day up to 150 mg/day in one week. The following data were also recorded before starting the treatments (T0) and then at week intervals for four weeks (W1-4): age, gender, primary cancer and known metastases, pain causes and mechanisms, symptoms associated with opioid therapy, pain intensity, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), morphine doses and escalation indexes (OEIs), and quality of life.. Forty-eight patients completed the study, twenty-eight and sixteen patients in group MO and MO-PR, respectively. Twenty patients were females, the mean age was 65.5 (± 10.3), and the mean Karnofsky status was 66.0 (± 18.9). No differences between groups were found in age (P = 0.839), Karnofsky status (P = 0.741), opioid doses as well as escalation indexes (OEI mg, P = 0.260, and OEI%, P = 0.270). No differences between the two groups were found in quality of life and all BPI items.. The use of low doses of pregabalin added to morphine therapy in advanced cancer patients does not seem to provide advantageous analgesic effects, despite limitations of the present study due to the number of drop-outs.

Topics: Analgesics; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Italy; Male; Morphine; Neoplasms; Pain; Pain Measurement; Palliative Care; Pregabalin; Treatment Outcome

Neuropathic pain is difficult to diagnose and difficult to treat with certainty. So the aim of the study was to evaluate comparative clinical efficacy of pregabaline with amitriptyline and gabapentin in neuropathic cancer pain. A total of 120 patients with cancer having severe neuropathic cancer pain were enrolled in the study after taking approval from Institutional Ethics Committee and divided in to 4 groups: group AT-amitriptyline, group GB-gabapentin, group PG-pregabalin, and group PL-placebo. Oral morphine was used for rescue analgesic for continued pain. Pain score (Visual Analogue scale) and secondary outcome measures such as intensity of lancinating, dysesthesia, and burning on numerical rating scale, Global satisfaction score (GSS), Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group scoring (ECOG), and adverse effects were assessed. At the end of study there was significant decrease in pain score in group PG as compared to the other groups; group AT (P = .003), group GB (P = .042), and group PL (P = .024). Percentage of patients with lancinating pain and dysesthesia were significantly less in group PG as compared to groups GB and PL. All the patients in group PL needed rescue morphine. After 4 visits, maximum improvement in ECOG scoring and GSS scoring was observed in group PG patients. Our results suggested that all antineuropathic drugs are effective in relieving cancer-related neuropathic pain. There was statistically and clinically significant morphine sparing effect of pregabaline in relieving neuropathic cancer pain and neuropathic symptoms as compared to other antineuropathic drugs.

Topics: Adult; Amines; Amitriptyline; Analgesics; Analysis of Variance; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Male; Morphine; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Pain Measurement; Pregabalin; Prospective Studies

Neuropathic pain frequently occurs in cancer patients, but no drug therapy has been established for this type of disorder. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of duloxetine in cancer patients suffering from neuropathic pain.. The subjects of the study were 15 cancer patients with neuropathic pain who visited the Kinki University Faculty of Medicine Hospital and met the International Association for the Study of Pain diagnostic criteria for neuropathic pain. Duloxetine was administered to patients in whom pregabalin could not be administered. The influence of duloxetine was investigated retrospectively with the use of a numerical rating scale.. Pain was reduced in 7 out of the 15 patients. Sleepiness and the light-headed feeling were improved in four patients, in whom, however, the pain was not reduced. Thus, duloxetine was judged to be effective in 11 patients. The maintenance dose of duloxetine was 20-40 mg/day.. Duloxetine administration may be effective for neuropathic pain in cancer patients who cannot tolerate pregabalin administration.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics; Antidepressive Agents; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Female; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Pilot Projects; Pregabalin; Thiophenes

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pregabalin in the management of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain in patients with childhood solid tumors and leukaemia.. In an open-label study, 30 children (11 boys and 19 girls; mean age 13.5 years) who were treated for solid tumors and leukaemia, and developed a painful peripheral neuropathy, were medicated with pregabalin in the daily dose of 150-300 mg for 8 weeks.. Twenty-eight patients completed the 8-week follow-up. A significant and long-lasting pain relief was noted in 86% of these patients. Median VAS score decreased by 59% at the 8th week from baseline. Adverse effects were infrequent and transient.. The treatment with pregabalin resulted in a significant improvement in pain symptoms. The use of pregabalin in children is off-label so far. However, this drug seems to be a safe and effective remedy, which could significantly broaden the therapeutic spectrum in paediatric oncological patients suffering from neuropathic pain.

Topics: Adolescent; Analgesics; Antineoplastic Agents; Child; Female; Follow-Up Studies; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Pain Measurement; Pregabalin

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of opioid-induced neurotoxicity (OIN) in cancer patients receiving oral controlled-release oxycodone and to define risk factors for OIN.. This was a single-center, retrospective study of hospitalized adult cancer patients receiving oral controlled-release oxycodone between April 1, 2013, and April, 30, 2020. The onset of OIN within 30 days after oxycodone initiation in the study patients was investigated. OIN was defined as any of the following: delirium, hallucinations (visual or auditory), seizure, myoclonus, hyperesthesia, and excessive somnolence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for OIN in patients receiving oxycodone.. In total, 520 patients were included in this study. The number of patients with OIN was 65 (12.5%). The median time until onset of OIN after oxycodone initiation was 7.5 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥ 65 years (OR = 2.74, 95% CI [1.30-5.78], p = 0.008), total bilirubin ≥ 1.3 mg/dL (OR = 4.85, 95% CI [2.13-11.0], p < 0.001), and concomitant use of pregabalin or mirogabalin (OR = 3.11, 95% CI [1.47-6.61], p = 0.003) were significant independent risk factors for OIN.. Age ≥ 65 years, liver dysfunction, and concomitant use of pregabalin or mirogabalin were independent risk factors for OIN in patients receiving oxycodone. Patients with these risk factors who are receiving oxycodone should be monitored for OIN, especially early in the administration of oxycodone.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Neoplasms; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Oxycodone; Pregabalin; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors

Patients with cancer receiving pregabalin potentially have a high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) symptoms. The purpose of this study was to explore clinical factors influencing the incidence of CNS symptoms, including plasma pregabalin exposure, cancer cachexia, and opioid analgesic cotreatment.. Sixty-eight patients with cancer receiving twice-daily pregabalin were enrolled. Plasma concentrations of pregabalin, clinical laboratory data, opioid analgesic cotreatment, and the Glasgow Prognostic Score, which is an inflammation-based cachexia score, were considered as clinical factors. The incidence of CNS symptoms was collected from the patients' medical records. The predose plasma concentrations of pregabalin at steady state were determined by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography.. The steady-state trough plasma pregabalin concentrations showed a large variability with an interquartile range of 0.43-1.2 mg/L per mg/kg and were negatively correlated with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). C-reactive protein (standardized partial regression coefficient, β = 0.31) and opioid analgesic cotreatment (β = 0.24) were also identified in addition to eGFR (β = -0.60) in the multiple regression analysis. The incidence of CNS symptoms was significantly increased with opioid analgesic cotreatment and a higher Glasgow Prognostic Score but not with the absolute value of plasma pregabalin concentrations, eGFR, or other clinical laboratory data.. In patients with cancer, steady-state trough plasma pregabalin concentrations were altered with renal function, systemic inflammation, and opioid analgesic cotreatment. However, a higher incidence of CNS symptoms observed in patients with cancer on pregabalin was more related to cachexia and opioid analgesic cotreatment than to altered pregabalin concentrations.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; C-Reactive Protein; Cachexia; Central Nervous System Diseases; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Nervous System; Pain Measurement; Pregabalin

Pregabalin is used for the relief of neuropathic pain in patients with and without cancer. However, no report has examined whether there is a difference in the adverse drug event (ADE) profile of pregabalin in each context. We aimed to establish whether pregabalin's ADE profile was different between patients with and without cancer. This study was based on the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database, which is a spontaneous reporting database.. Reports obtained from the JADER database were analysed from April 2004 to December 2016 for ADEs, using reporting odds ratios (RORs), a method of disproportionality analysis. We evaluated the association between the RORs and ADEs of pregabalin and compared the age, dosage and time at which ADEs occurred in patients with and without cancer. The primary outcome was RORs. Secondary outcomes were expression age and time-to-onset of ADE among patients with and without cancer.. In total, 426 216 reports from the JADER database were analysed. The major side effects associated with pregabalin among both patient groups were interstitial pneumonia, renal failure, liver failure, altered consciousness, heart failure and rhabdomyolysis. The pregabalin dose was significantly higher in patients with cancer than in those without cancer. Furthermore, the times to reporting of interstitial pneumonia, altered consciousness and liver failure were significantly shorter in patients with cancer than in those without cancer.. The ADE profiles of pregabalin were broadly similar among patients with and without cancer, but time-to-onset and type of some ADEs may be different.

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Databases, Factual; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Pregabalin

Topics: Analgesics; Breakthrough Pain; Female; Humans; Male; Neoplasms; Palliative Care; Pregabalin

Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Analgesics; Cooperative Behavior; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Geriatrics; Germany; Health Services Needs and Demand; Heart Failure; Hospice Care; Humans; Interdisciplinary Communication; Neoplasms; Pain Management; Palliative Care; Patient Participation; Physician-Patient Relations; Pregabalin; Professional-Family Relations; Pruritus; Terminal Care; Uremia

This study included patients who were prescribed pregabalin, vitamin B12, amitriptyline, clonazepam, or carbamazepine to improve oxaliplatin(L-OHP)- or paclitaxel(PTX)-induced peripheral neuropathy at Iwate Medical University Hospital between April 2011 and July 2012. The efficacy and safety of pregabalin was evaluated by comparing 27 patients with L-OHP-induced peripheral neuropathy and 28 with PTX-induced peripheral neuropathy prescribed pregabalin(pregabalin group) with 20 patients with L-OHP-induced peripheral neuropathy and 25 with PTX-induced peripheral neuropathy prescribed other drugs(non-pregabalin group). Response was defined as a decrease in neuropathy of at least 1 grade from baseline. The response rates were 40.7% and 10.0% for L-OHP-induced peripheral neuropathy patients and 28.6% and 12.0% for PTX-induced peripheral neuropathy patients in the pregabalin and non-pregabalin groups, respectively. The severity of peripheral neuropathy before and after the administration of pregabalin differed significantly[L-OHP, 1.33±0.48(mean±SD) vs. 1.00±0.78 and PTX, 1.46±0.69 vs. 1.21±0.88]. In 28-37% of patients, pregabalin was associated with adverse events, with drowsiness and dizziness being frequently observed. In conclusion, pregabalin was efficacious in reducing the severity of L-OHP- and PTX-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Organoplatinum Compounds; Oxaliplatin; Paclitaxel; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Pregabalin; Retrospective Studies

Evidence to support the use of pregabalin in combination with opioid analgesics for the treatment of cancer-related neuropathic pain is limited.. We carried out a retrospective investigation on patients hospitalized in our department with cancer-related neuropathic pain and under pregabalin treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: A group (= < 300 mg pregabalin daily) and B group (> 300 mg pregabalin daily). The two groups were compared in terms of a suite of factors (e. g., age starting and maimtenance dose of pregabaline, adverse effect).. Patient's age was significantly lower in the B group (> 300 mg pregabalin daily). Of the total number of patients involved in the study, 67% experienced mild and moderate somnolence.. In this retrospective investigation, we conclude that the younger cancer patients may need lager doses of pregabalin to relieve cancer-related neuropathic pain. In addition, the mild and moderate somnolence occurs frequently when pregabalin is administered with opioid analgesics for the treatment of cancer-related neuropathic pain.

Topics: Aged; Analgesics; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Female; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Palliative Care; Pregabalin; Retrospective Studies

A previous study of cancer-related neuropathic pain (NP) found that a 10-fold increase in pregabalin (PGB) use increased patients' satisfaction with treatment. Further research of PGB vs. non-pregabalin (non-PGB) treatment was carried out to assess if the use of more specific NP-targeting drugs, such as PGB, in combined therapy, in patients with cancer-related NP, provides better health outcomes.. Post hoc analysis of PGB- vs. non- PGB-treated patients in a 2-month epidemiological, prospective, multicentre study to assess NP prevalence and management in cancer pain patients visiting radiotherapy oncologic units. Patients undertook the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Medical Outcomes Sleep Scale (MOS-Sleep) and the short form (SF-12) Health Survey.. A total of 273 patients with no previous PGB treatment: 162 were treated with PGB polytherapy and 111 with other treatments. At 8 weeks, satisfaction with treatment was 92.6% (PGB) vs. 78.9% (non-PGB), p=0.0024, and benzodiazepine use 37.8% (non-PGB) vs. 19.8% (PGB), p=0.0009. The decreases in BPI total pain intensity and total interference with activities and in MOS overall sleep problems index were significantly larger in the PGB group.. The addition of more specific NP-targeting drugs to usual treatment, such as PGB, in NP cancer patients provides more satisfaction with treatment and better outcomes in terms of pain intensity, interference with activities and sleep than treatments without specific NP-targeting drugs. Anxiolytic profile of PGB could allow for less use of benzodiazepines.

Topics: Aged; Analgesia; Analgesics; Female; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Motor Activity; Neoplasms; Neuralgia; Pain Measurement; Pregabalin; Retrospective Studies; Sleep; Treatment Outcome