prednisone has been researched along with Microscopic Polyangiitis in 13 studies
Prednisone: A synthetic anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid derived from CORTISONE. It is biologically inert and converted to PREDNISOLONE in the liver.
prednisone : A synthetic glucocorticoid drug that is particularly effective as an immunosuppressant, and affects virtually all of the immune system. Prednisone is a prodrug that is converted by the liver into prednisolone (a beta-hydroxy group instead of the oxo group at position 11), which is the active drug and also a steroid.
Microscopic Polyangiitis: A primary systemic vasculitis of small- and some medium-sized vessels. It is characterized by a tropism for kidneys and lungs, positive association with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), and a paucity of immunoglobulin deposits in vessel walls.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) or granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) received either avacopan 30 mg twice daily for 52 weeks plus prednisone-matching placebo or tapered prednisone over 20 weeks plus avacopan-matching placebo for 52 weeks." | 5.69 | Efficacy and safety of avacopan in Japanese patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: A subanalysis of a randomized Phase 3 study. ( Dobashi, H; Harigai, M; Kaname, S; Kubono, S; Tamura, N; Yoshida, T, 2023) |
" We describe a 77-year-old man with microscopic polyangiitis with pulmonary-renal syndrome treated with prednisone and intravenous cyclophosphamide who developed KS (HHV-8 positive) after 2 months of treatment." | 5.12 | Kaposi sarcoma in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a case-based review. ( Kermani, TA; Sarantopoulos, GP; Singh, AS; Tiong, BK, 2021) |
"A prednisone increase led to remission in 35 patients (80%)." | 2.80 | Outcomes of nonsevere relapses in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis treated with glucocorticoids. ( Brunetta, P; Ding, L; Fervenza, FC; Hoffman, GS; Iklé, D; Kallenberg, CG; Langford, CA; Lim, N; Merkel, PA; Miloslavsky, EM; Monach, PA; Seo, P; Specks, U; Spiera, R; St Clair, EW; Stone, JH; Tchao, NK; Villareal, M, 2015) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 6 (46.15) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 7 (53.85) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Bui, A | 1 |
Butts, EB | 1 |
Aslam, N | 1 |
Harigai, M | 2 |
Takada, H | 1 |
Kaname, S | 1 |
Tamura, N | 1 |
Dobashi, H | 1 |
Kubono, S | 1 |
Yoshida, T | 2 |
Maruyama, Y | 1 |
Maruyama, I | 1 |
Rasheed, N | 1 |
Ahuja, R | 1 |
Borneo, H | 1 |
Tiong, BK | 1 |
Singh, AS | 1 |
Sarantopoulos, GP | 1 |
Kermani, TA | 1 |
Chasseur, P | 1 |
Blockmans, D | 1 |
von Frenckell, C | 1 |
Nicolas, JB | 1 |
Regniers, C | 1 |
Vandergheynst, F | 1 |
Miloslavsky, EM | 1 |
Specks, U | 3 |
Merkel, PA | 2 |
Seo, P | 2 |
Spiera, R | 2 |
Langford, CA | 3 |
Hoffman, GS | 2 |
Kallenberg, CG | 2 |
St Clair, EW | 2 |
Tchao, NK | 2 |
Ding, L | 2 |
Iklé, D | 2 |
Villareal, M | 1 |
Lim, N | 1 |
Brunetta, P | 2 |
Fervenza, FC | 3 |
Monach, PA | 2 |
Stone, JH | 2 |
Decker, ML | 1 |
Emery, DJ | 1 |
Smyth, PS | 1 |
Lu, JQ | 1 |
Lacson, A | 1 |
Yacyshyn, E | 1 |
Silva, F | 1 |
Kalra, S | 1 |
Hogan, MC | 1 |
Leung, N | 1 |
Sethi, S | 1 |
Turkiewicz, A | 1 |
Webber, L | 1 |
Sejismundo, LP | 1 |
Mieras, K | 1 |
Weitzenkamp, D | 1 |
Seyfert-Margolis, V | 1 |
Mueller, M | 1 |
Allen, NB | 1 |
Geetha, D | 1 |
Keogh, KA | 1 |
Kissin, EY | 1 |
Peikert, T | 1 |
Stegeman, C | 1 |
Ytterberg, SR | 1 |
Sassi, SB | 1 |
Ghorbel, IB | 1 |
Mizouni, H | 1 |
Houman, MH | 1 |
Hentati, F | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CCX168 (Avacopan) in Patients With ANCA-Associated Vasculitis Treated Concomitantly With Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide/Azathioprine[NCT02994927] | Phase 3 | 331 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-03-15 | Completed | ||
Rituximab Therapy for the Induction of Remission and Tolerance in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (ITN021AI)[NCT00104299] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 197 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-01-31 | Completed | ||
A Pilot Study of Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Patients With p-ANCA Microscopic Polyangiitis and Mild to Moderate Renal Dysfunction.[NCT00405860] | Phase 1 | 18 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2002-12-31 | Completed | ||
Rituximab for the Otolaryngologic Manifestations of Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis[NCT02626845] | Phase 4 | 3 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-12-31 | Terminated (stopped due to Slow recruitment) | ||
Low-dose Glucocorticoids Plus Rituximab Versus High-dose Glucocorticoids Plus Rituximab for Remission Induction in ANCA-associated Vasculitis; a Multicentre, Open Label, Randomised Control Trial[NCT02198248] | Phase 4 | 140 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-10-31 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Biosimilars of Rituximab in ANCA-associated Vasculitis Compared to the Originator (BRAVO): a CanVasc Multicentre Study[NCT05716334] | 240 participants (Anticipated) | Observational | 2021-06-15 | Recruiting | |||
Salvage Therapy for Patients With Inadequate Response to Standard of Care Therapy in Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis[NCT04871191] | Phase 2 | 42 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-03-31 | Not yet recruiting | ||
Rituximab for Anti-neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis (RAVE) Long-Term Follow-Up Study[NCT01586858] | 67 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2012-05-31 | Terminated (stopped due to Loss of Funding) | |||
Maintenance of ANCA Vasculitis Remission by Intermittent Rituximab Dosing Based on B-cell Reconstitution vs a Serologic ANCA Flare[NCT02749292] | Phase 4 | 115 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-06-30 | Terminated (stopped due to Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the deleterious impact of rituximab on vaccination efficacy, the trial was concluded before reaching the target enrollment of 200.) | ||
Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in the Treatment of Good Prognosis Microscopic Polyangiitis[NCT03920722] | Phase 3 | 8 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2020-10-24 | Active, not recruiting | ||
An International, Open Label, Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Rituximab With Azathioprine as Maintenance Therapy in Relapsing ANCA-associated Vasculitis[NCT01697267] | Phase 3 | 188 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-04-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
"BVAS=Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score;~A relapse was defined as occurrence of at least one major item in the BVAS, or three or more minor items in the BVAS, or one or two minor items in the BVAS recorded at two consecutive visits, after:~having achieved remission at Week 26 (BVAS=0 and no glucocorticoids for ANCA-associated vasculitis within 4 weeks) or~having achieved BVAS=0 at any time during the treatment period~The BVAS form is divided into 9 organ-based systems, with each section including symptoms/signs that are typical of that particular organ involvement in systemic vasculitis. The clinician only scores features believed to be due to active vasculitis. Completion of the form provides a numerical score, which ranges from 0 (best health) to 63 (worst health)." (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Prednisone Group | 33 |
Avacopan Group | 16 |
"Clinical significance was assessed by the individual reading of the ECGs~ECG=Electrocardiogram" (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Prednisone Group | 8 |
Avacopan Group | 12 |
"AC=Adjudication Committee; BVAS=Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score;~The BVAS form is divided into 9 organ-based systems, with each section including symptoms/signs that are typical of that particular organ involvement in systemic vasculitis. The clinician only scores features believed to be due to active vasculitis. Completion of the form provides a numerical score, which ranges from 0 (best health) to 63 (worst health)." (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Week 4
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Prednisone Group | 68.9 |
Avacopan Group | 62.7 |
"Disease remission at Week 26 was defined as:~Achieving a BVAS of 0 as determined by the Adjudication Committee;~No administration of glucocorticoids given for ANCA-associated vasculitis within 4 weeks prior to Week 26;~No BVAS >0 during the 4 weeks prior to Week 26 (if collected for an unscheduled assessment)." (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Week 26
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Prednisone Group | 70.1 |
Avacopan Group | 72.3 |
"Sustained remission at Week 52 was defined as:~Disease remission at Week 26 as defined above;~Disease remission at Week 52 defined as a BVAS of 0 at Week 52 as determined by the Adjudication Committee and no administration of glucocorticoids for treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis within 4 weeks prior to Week 52;~No disease relapse between Week 26 and Week 52 as determined by the Adjudication Committee." (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Prednisone Group | 54.9 |
Avacopan Group | 65.7 |
"The median time to relapse was not estimable because of small number of relapsed subjects.~A relapse was defined as occurrence of at least one major item in the BVAS, or three or more minor items in the BVAS, or one or two minor items in the BVAS recorded at two consecutive visits, after:~having achieved remission at Week 26 (BVAS=0 and no glucocorticoids for ANCA-associated vasculitis within 4 weeks) or~having achieved BVAS=0 at any time during the treatment period~The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) form is divided into 9 organ-based systems, with each section including symptoms/signs that are typical of that particular organ involvement in systemic vasculitis. The clinician only scores features believed to be due to active vasculitis. Completion of the form provides a numerical score, which ranges from 0 (best health) to 63 (worst health)." (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Prednisone Group | 21.0 |
Avacopan Group | 10.1 |
"The median time to relapse was not estimable because of small number of relapsed subjects.~A relapse was defined as occurrence of at least one major item in the BVAS, or three or more minor items in the BVAS, or one or two minor items in the BVAS recorded at two consecutive visits, after:~having achieved remission at Week 26 (BVAS=0 and no glucocorticoids for ANCA-associated vasculitis within 4 weeks) or~having achieved BVAS=0 at any time during the treatment period~ANCA=anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody; BVAS=Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score; The BVAS form is divided into 9 organ-based systems, with each section including symptoms/signs that are typical of that particular organ involvement in systemic vasculitis. The clinician only scores features believed to be due to active vasculitis. Completion of the form provides a numerical score, which ranges from 0 (best health) to 63 (worst health)." (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Prednisone Group | 12.2 |
Avacopan Group | 7.5 |
"WBC=White Blood Cell~TEAE=Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event" (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any Treatment-Emergent Infection | Any Serious Treatment-Emergent Infection | Any Severe Treatment-Emergent Infection | Any Treatment-Emergent Infection Leading to Study Withdrawal | Any Treatment-Emergent Life-threatening Infection | Any Treatment-Emergent Infection Leading to Death | Any TEAE Associated with Hepatic Abnormalities | Any TEAE Associated with Low WBC Counts | Any TEAE Associated with hypersensitivity | |
Avacopan Group | 113 | 22 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 31 | 68 |
Prednisone Group | 124 | 25 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 39 | 70 |
(NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | 10^3 cells/μL (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leukocytes (Week 26) | Leukocytes (Week 52) | Neutrophils (Week 26) | Neutrophils (Week 52) | Lymphocytes (Week 26) | Lymphocytes (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | -5.94 | -5.62 | -5.24 | -4.95 | -0.84 | -0.82 |
Prednisone Group | -5.69 | -5.54 | -5.10 | -4.89 | -0.62 | -0.67 |
(NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | 10^9 cells/L (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eosinophils (Week 26) | Eosinophils (Week 52) | Basophils (Week 26) | Basophils (Week 52) | Monocytes (Week 26) | Monocytes (Week 52) | Platelets (Week 26) | Platelets (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | 0.07 | 0.07 | -0.00 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.01 | -77.1 | -73.8 |
Prednisone Group | 0.07 | 0.05 | -0.01 | -0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | -73.9 | -75.5 |
(NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | 10^12 cells/L (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Erythrocytes (Week 26) | Erythrocytes (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | 0.252 | 0.279 |
Prednisone Group | 0.226 | 0.244 |
(NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | g/dL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Hemoglobin (Week 26) | Hemoglobin (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | 1.10 | 1.27 |
Prednisone Group | 1.07 | 1.20 |
(NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | percentage of red blood cells (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Hematocrit (Week 26) | Hematocrit (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | 2.7 | 3.2 |
Prednisone Group | 2.6 | 3.0 |
(NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | U/L (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Week 26) | Lactate Dehydrogenase (Week 52) | Alkaline Phosphatase (Week 26) | Alkaline Phosphatase (Week 52) | Creatine Kinase (Week 26) | Creatine Kinase (Week 52) | Alanine Aminotransferase (Week 26) | Alanine Aminotransferase (Week 52) | Aspartate Aminotransferase (Week 26) | Aspartate Aminotransferase (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | -6.1 | -10.7 | -3.9 | -4.0 | 76.8 | 76.3 | -6.1 | -7.2 | 2.5 | 2.0 |
Prednisone Group | 2.3 | -8.6 | -0.6 | 0.8 | 47.6 | 57.6 | -6.8 | -8.2 | 1.9 | 0.5 |
(NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creatinine (Week 26) | Creatinine (Week 52) | Urea Nitrogen (Week 26) | Urea Nitrogen (Week 52) | Protein (Week 26) | Protein (Week 52) | Cholesterol (Week 26) | Cholesterol (Week 52) | LDL Cholesterol (Week 26) | LDL Cholesterol (Week 52) | Bilirubin (Week 26) | Bilirubin (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | -0.195 | -0.244 | -11.0 | -11.9 | 220 | 250 | 7.4 | 9.3 | 12.0 | 11.9 | 0.078 | 0.057 |
Prednisone Group | -0.105 | -0.200 | -9.4 | -7.8 | 50 | 160 | 19.0 | 13.8 | 22.7 | 21.7 | 0.065 | 0.053 |
(NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Systolic Blood Pressure (Week 26) | Systolic Blood Pressure (Week 52) | Diastolic Blood Pressure (Week 26) | Diastolic Blood Pressure (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | -2.6 | -1.0 | 0.5 | 1.4 |
Prednisone Group | -2.5 | -2.4 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
(NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | beats/min (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Pulse Rate (Week 26) | Pulse Rate (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | 0.9 | -0.3 |
Prednisone Group | 2.2 | -1.3 |
(NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | degree Celsius (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Temperature (Week 26) | Temperature (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | -0.11 | -0.11 |
Prednisone Group | -0.03 | 0.04 |
(NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | kilogram(s) (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Weight (Week 26) | Weight (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | 1.93 | 2.59 |
Prednisone Group | 3.33 | 3.27 |
BMI=Body Mass Index (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | kilogram(s)/ square meter (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
BMI (Week 26) | BMI (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | 0.67 | 0.94 |
Prednisone Group | 1.13 | 1.12 |
"SF-36v2: Measure of health- related quality of life (Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 version 2)~EQ-5D-5L: EuroQuality of Life-5 Domains-5 Levels~The SF-36v2 component scores and the EQ-5D-5L VAS score range from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health). The EQ-5D-5L Index Score ranges from 0 (worst health) to 1 (best health)." (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | Change from baseline (Least Squares Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF-36v2: Physical Component Score (Week 26) | SF-36v2: Physical Component Score (Week 52) | SF-36v2: Physical Functioning (Week 26) | SF-36v2: Physical Functioning (Week 52) | SF-36v2: Role Physical (Week 26) | SF-36v2: Role Physical (Week 52) | SF-36v2: Bodily Pain (Week 26) | SF-36v2: Bodily Pain (Week 52) | SF-36v2: General Health Perception (Week 26) | SF-36v2: General Health Perception (Week 52) | SF-36v2: Mental Component Score (Week 26) | SF-36v2: Mental Component Score (Week 52) | SF-36v2: Mental Health (Week 26) | SF-36v2: Mental Health (Week 52) | SF-36v2: Role Emotional (Week 26) | SF-36v2: Role Emotional (Week 52) | SF-36v2: Social Functioning (Week 26) | SF-36v2: Social Functioning (Week 52) | SF-36v2: Vitality (Week 26) | SF-36v2: Vitality (Week 52) | EQ-5D-5L VAS Score (Week 26) | EQ-5D-5L VAS Score (Week 52) | EQ-5D-5L Index Score (Week 26) | EQ-5D-5L Index Score (Week 52) | |
Avacopan Group | 4.445 | 4.980 | 7.31 | 9.55 | 16.78 | 17.12 | 14.75 | 16.12 | 3.12 | 5.84 | 4.849 | 6.394 | 8.29 | 10.89 | 7.32 | 9.38 | 14.50 | 18.06 | 12.03 | 14.36 | 9.1 | 13.0 | 0.0229 | 0.0474 |
Prednisone Group | 1.344 | 2.626 | 1.88 | 4.82 | 7.52 | 12.27 | 9.82 | 11.87 | -2.89 | -0.17 | 3.271 | 4.694 | 6.84 | 9.66 | 1.40 | 4.14 | 11.09 | 13.56 | 6.42 | 10.48 | 5.5 | 7.1 | -0.0010 | -0.0038 |
VDI=Vasculitis Damage Index; The VDI is comprised of 64 items of damage, grouped into 11 organ-based systems or categorizations. Damage is defined as the presence of non-healing scars and does not give any indication of current disease activity. Damage is also defined as having been present or currently present for at least 3 months. Completion of the form provides a numerical score, which ranges from 0 (best health) to 64 (worst health). (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 26 | Week 52 | |
Avacopan Group | 1.06 | 1.17 |
Prednisone Group | 0.97 | 1.15 |
"GTI-CWS=Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index Cumulative Worsening Score;~GTI-AIS=Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index Aggregate Improvement Score;~The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) was developed to score glucocorticoid toxicity. The GTI includes: the Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) that captures cumulative toxicity, both permanent and transient, over the course of time (serves as a cumulative record of toxicity); and the Aggregate Improvement Score that captures both improvement and worsening of toxicity over time (serves as a record of both improving and worsening toxicity). Both scores range from 0 (best health) to 100 (worst health)." (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 13 and 26
Intervention | Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (Least Squares Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
GTI-CWS (Week 13) | GTI-CWS (Week 26) | GTI-AIS (Week 13) | GTI-AIS (Week 26) | |
Avacopan Group | 25.7 | 39.7 | 9.9 | 11.2 |
Prednisone Group | 36.6 | 56.6 | 23.2 | 23.4 |
"BVAS=Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score~UACR=Urinary albumin:creatinine ratio" (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 26 and 52
Intervention | Percentage change (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Week 4 | Week 26 | Week 52 | |
Avacopan Group | -40 | -63 | -74 |
Prednisone Group | 0 | -70 | -77 |
"Change from baseline in kidney function, as measured by eGFR (based on the MDRD equation), was measured in subjects with renal disease based on the BVAS renal component.~eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate~BVAS=Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score~MDRD=Modification of Diet in Renal Disease" (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m^2) (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 26 | Week 52 | |
Avacopan Group | 5.8 | 7.3 |
Prednisone Group | 2.9 | 4.1 |
"BVAS=Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score~MCP-1=monocyte chemoattractant protein-1" (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Intervention | Percentage change (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 26 | Week 52 | |
Avacopan Group | -67 | -73 |
Prednisone Group | -64 | -71 |
AE=Adverse Event (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Relationship of avacopan/placebo to an AE | Relationship of glucocorticoid use to an AE | Relationship of cyclophosphamide IV use to an AE | Relationship of oral cyclophosphamide use to an AE | Relationship of rituximab use to an AE | Relationship of azathioprine use to an AE | Relationship of mycophenolate use to an AE | |
Avacopan Group | 100 | 107 | 31 | 8 | 50 | 28 | 6 |
Prednisone Group | 103 | 131 | 30 | 4 | 61 | 35 | 9 |
"AEs=Adverse events~SAEs=Serious adverse events~TEAE=Treatment-emergent adverse event" (NCT02994927)
Timeframe: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Intervention | Number (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of subjects with at least one TEAE | Number of TEAEs | Number of subjects with SAEs | Number of SAEs | Subjects with TEAE leading to discontinuation | |
Avacopan Group | 164 | 1779 | 70 | 116 | 27 |
Prednisone Group | 161 | 2139 | 74 | 166 | 28 |
A Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG) score of 0 with prednisone taper successfully completed at six months. The BVAS/WG is a validated disease activity index. The BVAS/WG is designed to document new or worsening clinically active vasculitis and consists of a set of items divided into nine organ based systems. BVAS/WG scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more active disease. (NCT00104299)
Timeframe: 6 months post-randomization
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rituximab | 63 |
Control Group | 52 |
"The 2-sided 95% CI of the percentage of participants who have a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG)[1] of 0 and have successfully completed the glucocorticoid taper by 6 months post-randomization and the 2-sided 95% CI of the difference between two arms for assessing the superiority of rituximab to control~[1] The BVAS/WG is a disease activity index designed to document new or worsening clinically active vasculitis consisting of items divided into 9 organ based systems. BVAS/WG scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more active disease" (NCT00104299)
Timeframe: 6 months post-randomization
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Rituximab | 62 |
Control Group | 51 |
Number of subjects according to originally received treatment that experienced a serious adverse event through 18 months post-randomization or prior to being censored from analyses due to crossover, switching to open-label treatment, or best medical judgment for censor. Events are categorized by coded system organ classes (SOC). Within each SOC, a participant was counted once if the participant reported one or more events coded to that SOC. (NCT00104299)
Timeframe: Randomization to censor at Crossover, Open-label or Best Medical Judgment (up to 18 months post-randomization)
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# Participants with at least one SAE | Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders | Cardiac Disorders | Eye Disorders | Gastrointestinal Disorders | General Disorders and Administration Site | Immune System Disorders | Infections and Infestations | Injury, Poisoning, and Procedural Complications | Investigations | Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders | Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders | Neoplasms Benign, Malignant, and Unspecified | Nervous System Disorders | Pregnancy, Puerperium, and Perinatal Conditions | Psychiatric Disorders | Renal and Urinary Disorders | Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders | Vascular Disorders | |
Control Group | 37 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 7 |
Rituximab | 42 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 1 |
The adverse event rate for the following events considered related to vasculitis: Death; Grade 2 or higher leukopenia or thrombocytopenia; Grade 3 or higher infections; Hemorrhagic cystitis (grade 2 or lower needs confirmation by cytoscopy); Malignancy; Venous thromboembolic event (deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism); Hospitalization resulting either from the disease or from a complication due to study treatment; Infusion reactions (within 24 hours of infusion) that result in the cessation of further infusions (including cytokine release allergic reaction); Cerebrovascular accident (NCT00104299)
Timeframe: Through common close-out (defined as 18 months after the last participant is enrolled in the trial)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Death | Grade 2 or Higher Leukopenia | Grade 2 or Higher Thrombocytopenia | Grade 3 or Higher Infections | Hemorrhagic Cystitis (Grade 2 or Lower) | Malignancy | Venous Thromboembolic Event | Hospitalization Resulting from the Disease | Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) | Infusion Reactions Leading to Infusion Disc. | |
Control Group | 2 | 23 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
Rituximab | 2 | 7 | 4 | 18 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 1 | 1 |
"Duration of complete remission is defined as a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG)[1] of 0 and a completing taper of Prednisone to the first flare, BVAS/WG score of greater than 0, or an increase in Prednisone dosing.~[1] The BVAS/WG is a disease activity index designed to document new or worsening clinically active vasculitis consisting of items divided into 9 organ based systems. BVAS/WG scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more active disease" (NCT00104299)
Timeframe: 18 months post-randomization
Intervention | Days (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
25% Quartile (95%CI) | 50% Quartile (95%CI) | 75% Quartile (95%CI) | |
Control Group | 230 | NA | NA |
Rituximab | 243 | NA | NA |
Duration of remission is defined as a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG)[1] of 0 and a completing taper of glucocorticoid by 6 months post-randomization to the first flare, BVAS/WG score of greater than 0, or an increase in Prednisone dosing. (NCT00104299)
Timeframe: 18 months post-randomization
Intervention | Days (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
25% Quartile (95%CI) | 50% Quartile (95%CI) | 75% Quartile (95%CI) | |
Control Group | 168 | NA | NA |
Rituximab | 246 | NA | NA |
"Time to complete remission is defined as the number of days from baseline visit (Visit 1) to a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG)[1] of 0 and completing taper of glucocorticoid by 6 months post-randomization.~[1] The BVAS/WG is a disease activity index designed to document new or worsening clinically active vasculitis consisting of items divided into 9 organ based systems. BVAS/WG scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more active disease" (NCT00104299)
Timeframe: 18 months post-randomization
Intervention | Days (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
25% Quartile (95%CI) | 50% Quartile (95%CI) | 75% Quartile (95%CI) | |
Control Group | 177 | 183 | 266 |
Rituximab | 176 | 180 | 189 |
"Time to complete remission is defined as the number of days from baseline visit (Visit 1) to a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG)[1] of 0.~[1] The BVAS/WG is a disease activity index designed to document new or worsening clinically active vasculitis consisting of items divided into 9 organ based systems. BVAS/WG scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more active disease" (NCT00104299)
Timeframe: 18 months post-randomization
Intervention | Days (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
25% Quartile (95%CI) | 50% Quartile (95%CI) | 75% Quartile (95%CI) | |
Control Group | 29 | 43 | 112 |
Rituximab | 30 | 57 | 119 |
Number of disease relapse added with the number of SAE in each group (NCT02749292)
Timeframe: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)
Intervention | Number of events (Number) |
---|---|
B Cell Reconstitution | 27 |
Serologic ANCA Flare | 36 |
The rituximab utilization was measured in how many times a subject received Rituximab throughout the study which was then averaged for all subjects in each treatment arm, including those who did not receive any infusion. (NCT02749292)
Timeframe: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)
Intervention | Infusions per subject (Mean) |
---|---|
B Cell Reconstitution | 3.6 |
Serologic ANCA Flare | 0.5 |
The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG ) is a form with 34 predefined items grouped into 9 organ systems. The items are clinical features observed in patients with active ANCA vasculitis. Each item has a specified weight of either 3 or 1, depending on whether it reflects major or minor disease activity. The total BVAS/WG score is the weighted sum of individual manifestations that are present and believed to be due to active ANCA vasculitis. Higher scores reflect more active disease. BVAS/WG scores range from 0 to 64. (NCT02749292)
Timeframe: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)
Intervention | number of events (Number) |
---|---|
B Cell Reconstitution | 4 |
Serologic ANCA Flare | 7 |
Number of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs), including all episodes of late onset neutropenia (LON). SAE are defined in the Serious adverse event section. Serious adverse events were reported over the entire study period (5.5 years) (NCT02749292)
Timeframe: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
B Cell Reconstitution | 15 |
Serologic ANCA Flare | 14 |
Hypogammaglobulinemia defined as an IgG < 250mg/dL (NCT02749292)
Timeframe: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
B Cell Reconstitution | 1 |
Serologic ANCA Flare | 0 |
number of deaths throughout the study. (NCT02749292)
Timeframe: 5.5 years
Intervention | number of deaths (Number) |
---|---|
B Cell Reconstitution | 2 |
Serologic ANCA Flare | 0 |
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used in health economics as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. (NCT02749292)
Timeframe: Assessed throughout the study period, every 6 months unless such time point was not reached or was missed by the patient. Median follow-up period is of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical functioning at 6 months | Role functioning/physical at 6 months | Role functioning/emotional at 6 months | Energy/fatigue at 6 months | Emotional well-being at 6 months | Social functioning at 6 months | Pain at 6 months | General health at 6 months | Physical functioning at 36 months | Role functioning/physical at 36 months | Role functioning/emotional at 36 months | Energy/fatigue at 36 months | Emotional well-being at 36 months | Social functioning at 36 months | Pain at 36 months | General health at 36 months | Physical functioning at 12 months | Role functioning/physical at 12 months | Role functioning/emotional at 12 months | Energy/ fatigue at 12 months | Emotional well-being at 12 months | Social functioning at 12 months | Pain at 12 months | General health at 12 months | Physical functioning at 18 months | Role functioning/physical at 18 months | Role functioning/emotional at 18 months | Energy/fatigue at 18 months | Emotional well-being at 18 months | Social functioning at 18 months | Pain at 18 months | General health at 18 months | Physical functioning at 24 months | Role functioning/physical at 24 months | Role functioning/emotional at 24 months | Energy/fatigue at 24 months | Emotional well-being at 24 months | Social functioning at 24 months | Pain at 24 months | General health at 24 months | Physical functioning at 30 months | Role functioning/physical at 30 months | Role functioning/emotional at 30 months | Energy/fatigue at 30 months | Emotional well-being at 30 months | Social functioning at 30 months | Pain at 30 months | General health at 30 months | Physical functioning at 42 months | Role functioning/physical at 42 months | Role functioning/emotional at 42 months | Energy/fatigue at 42 months | Emotional well-being at 42 months | Social functioning at 42 months | Pain at 42 months | General health at 42 months | Physical functioning at 48 months | Role functioning/physical at 48 months | Role functioning/emotional at 48 months | Energy/fatigue at 48 months | Emotional well-being at 48 months | Social functioning at 48 months | Pain at 48 months | General health at 48 months | Physical functioning at 60 months | Role functioning/physical at 60 months | Role functioning/emotional at 60 months | Energy/fatigue at 60 months | Emotional well-being at 60 months | Social functioning at 60 months | Pain at 60 months | General health at 60 months | |
Serologic ANCA Flare | 82 | 65 | 75 | 67 | 81 | 88 | 82 | 63 | 88 | 79 | 82 | 73 | 84 | 95 | 87 | 70 | 82 | 63 | 68 | 65 | 81 | 86 | 80 | 63 | 82 | 62 | 74 | 68 | 81 | 92 | 82 | 67 | 88 | 71 | 80 | 76 | 85 | 94 | 82 | 70 | 88 | 72 | 80 | 72 | 84 | 94 | 83 | 70 | 82 | 60 | 76 | 70 | 85 | 87 | 82 | 63 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 85 | 100 | 80 | 75 | 92 | 100 | 89 | 71 | 83 | 92 | 83 | 70 |
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used in health economics as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. (NCT02749292)
Timeframe: Assessed throughout the study period, every 6 months unless such time point was not reached or was missed by the patient. Median follow-up period is of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical functioning at 6 months | Role functioning/physical at 6 months | Role functioning/emotional at 6 months | Energy/fatigue at 6 months | Emotional well-being at 6 months | Social functioning at 6 months | Pain at 6 months | General health at 6 months | Physical functioning at 36 months | Role functioning/physical at 36 months | Role functioning/emotional at 36 months | Energy/fatigue at 36 months | Emotional well-being at 36 months | Social functioning at 36 months | Pain at 36 months | General health at 36 months | Physical functioning at 12 months | Role functioning/physical at 12 months | Role functioning/emotional at 12 months | Energy/ fatigue at 12 months | Emotional well-being at 12 months | Social functioning at 12 months | Pain at 12 months | General health at 12 months | Physical functioning at 18 months | Role functioning/physical at 18 months | Role functioning/emotional at 18 months | Energy/fatigue at 18 months | Emotional well-being at 18 months | Social functioning at 18 months | Pain at 18 months | General health at 18 months | Physical functioning at 24 months | Role functioning/physical at 24 months | Role functioning/emotional at 24 months | Energy/fatigue at 24 months | Emotional well-being at 24 months | Social functioning at 24 months | Pain at 24 months | General health at 24 months | Physical functioning at 30 months | Role functioning/physical at 30 months | Role functioning/emotional at 30 months | Energy/fatigue at 30 months | Emotional well-being at 30 months | Social functioning at 30 months | Pain at 30 months | General health at 30 months | Physical functioning at 42 months | Role functioning/physical at 42 months | Role functioning/emotional at 42 months | Energy/fatigue at 42 months | Emotional well-being at 42 months | Social functioning at 42 months | Pain at 42 months | General health at 42 months | Physical functioning at 48 months | Role functioning/physical at 48 months | Role functioning/emotional at 48 months | Energy/fatigue at 48 months | Emotional well-being at 48 months | Social functioning at 48 months | Pain at 48 months | General health at 48 months | Physical functioning at 54 months | Role functioning/physical at 54 months | Role functioning/emotional at 54 months | Energy/fatigue at 54 months | Emotional well-being at 54 months | Social functioning at 54 months | Pain at 54 months | General health at 54 months | Physical functioning at 60 months | Role functioning/physical at 60 months | Role functioning/emotional at 60 months | Energy/fatigue at 60 months | Emotional well-being at 60 months | Social functioning at 60 months | Pain at 60 months | General health at 60 months | |
B Cell Reconstitution | 84 | 66 | 79 | 65 | 83 | 89 | 79 | 66 | 74 | 50 | 65 | 58 | 76 | 83 | 69 | 60 | 79 | 61 | 82 | 65 | 86 | 92 | 81 | 66 | 83 | 70 | 88 | 69 | 85 | 96 | 84 | 68 | 83 | 71 | 84 | 68 | 82 | 91 | 81 | 69 | 85 | 74 | 87 | 64 | 81 | 90 | 86 | 60 | 76 | 58 | 67 | 60 | 77 | 85 | 83 | 59 | 65 | 67 | 67 | 52 | 73 | 65 | 70 | 61 | 88 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 84 | 84 | 81 | 59 | 72 | 33 | 100 | 48 | 82 | 63 | 53 | 58 |
Number of infections mild and severe, whether they were treated or not with antibiotics (NCT02749292)
Timeframe: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)
Intervention | number of events (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Serious Adverse Events- Infections | Adverse Events- Infections | |
B Cell Reconstitution | 12 | 72 |
Serologic ANCA Flare | 6 | 59 |
Relapses recording period was from 6/1/2016 to 12/31/2021. The outcome was reported as the number of participants with disease relapse who had either positive ANCA titers specific for myeloperoxidase (MPO-ANCA) or proteinase 3 (PR3-ANCA). The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG ) is a form with 34 predefined items grouped into 9 organ systems. The items are clinical features observed in patients with active ANCA vasculitis. Each item has a specified weight of either 3 or 1, depending on whether it reflects major or minor disease activity. The total BVAS/WG score is the weighted sum of individual manifestations that are present and believed to be due to active ANCA vasculitis. Higher scores reflect more active disease. BVAS/WG scores range from 0 to 64. (NCT02749292)
Timeframe: Median follow-up period of 4.1 years (IQR, 2.5 - 5.0)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
PR3 | MPO | |
B Cell Reconstitution | 1 | 4 |
Serologic ANCA Flare | 7 | 7 |
The Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) is a validated formal assessment tool in ANCA-associated vasculitis clinical trials. The VDI distinguishes vasculitis-induced chronic damage from active inflammation or persistent disease. Each item represents a disease manifestation and is given a score (of 1) if present for at least 3 months. Neither the cause of damage (vasculitis vs treatment) nor an ongoing activity are taken into consideration. The VDI includes 64 items categorized into 11 groups (by organ system) and the scored items are summed to give a total score ranging from 0 to 64. A higher score means more accrued damage. (NCT02749292)
Timeframe: 3 years starting at inclusion
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
VDI at inclusion | VDI at 3 years | |
B Cell Reconstitution | 1.27 | 1.42 |
Serologic ANCA Flare | 1.07 | 1.08 |
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. Scores for the scale range from 0-100 and transformed to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in the reference population, with higher scores indicating a better Health-related Quality of Life. (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rituximab Maintenance | 50.8 |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 51.9 |
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. Scores for the scale range from 0-100 and transformed to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in the reference population, with higher scores indicating a better Health-related Quality of Life. (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: 24 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rituximab Maintenance | 51.9 |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 53.5 |
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. Scores for the scale range from 0-100 and transformed to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in the reference population, with higher scores indicating a better Health-related Quality of Life. (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: 36 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rituximab Maintenance | 52.3 |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 51.8 |
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. Scores for the scale range from 0-100 and transformed to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in the reference population, with higher scores indicating a better Health-related Quality of Life. (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: 4 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rituximab Maintenance | 51.8 |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 51.0 |
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. Scores for the scale range from 0-100 and transformed to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in the reference population, with higher scores indicating a better Health-related Quality of Life. (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: 48 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rituximab Maintenance | 50.9 |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 53.9 |
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. Scores for the scale range from 0-100 and transformed to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in the reference population, with higher scores indicating a better Health-related Quality of Life. (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rituximab Maintenance | 38.2 |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 34.6 |
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. Scores for the scale range from 0-100 and transformed to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in the reference population, with higher scores indicating a better Health-related Quality of Life. (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: 24 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rituximab Maintenance | 36.7 |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 35.6 |
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. Scores for the scale range from 0-100 and transformed to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in the reference population, with higher scores indicating a better Health-related Quality of Life. (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: 36 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rituximab Maintenance | 34.6 |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 33.8 |
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. Scores for the scale range from 0-100 and transformed to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in the reference population, with higher scores indicating a better Health-related Quality of Life. (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: 4 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rituximab Maintenance | 36.7 |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 36.1 |
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. Scores for the scale range from 0-100 and transformed to have a mean of 50 and SD of 10 in the reference population, with higher scores indicating a better Health-related Quality of Life. (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: 48 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Rituximab Maintenance | 35.8 |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 35.0 |
Infection (treated with intravenous or oral antibiotics) rates (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Rituximab Maintenance | 54 |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 62 |
Severe adverse event (SAE) rate (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: Up to 48 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Rituximab Maintenance | 37 |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 48 |
Cumulative accrual of damage as measured by the combined damage assessment score (CDA). Each persistent or new occurrence of damage is given a score of 1. The cumulative accrual of damage is obtained by summing across the different types of damage to get an overall score (max score = 64). (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: data in Rows represent the change from randomization (month 4) to months 12, 24, 36, and 48.
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Randomisation to month 12 | Randomisation to month 24 | Randomisation to month 36 | Randomisation to month 48 | |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 0.337 | 0.533 | 0.899 | 1.38 |
Rituximab Maintenance | 0.275 | 0.571 | 0.676 | 1.09 |
Cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) exposure during the trial. The trial had a common close out date when the final patient reached month 36 in the trial. Patients were followed until month 48 or the common close out date, whichever happened sooner. Therefore, follow up varied between 36 and 48 months. Cumulative glucocorticoid exposure is presented as a dose in mg for during the treatment period (up to month 24) and across the whole trial (until month 48 or common close out when the final patient reached month 36). (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: Up to 48 months
Intervention | mg (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Overall (randomisation to end of trial) | Maintenance treatment period (randomisation to month 24) | |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 4780 | 2426 |
Rituximab Maintenance | 3717 | 2184 |
Proportion of patients who maintain remission at 24 and 48 months (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: 24 and 48 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Month 24 | Month 48 | |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 70 | 44 |
Rituximab Maintenance | 73 | 54 |
The primary efficacy outcome measure of the trial is relapse-free survival, where a relapse is either major or minor. The primary analysis will be a Cox regression model adjusted for the stratification factors (ANCA type, relapse severity and prednisone induction regimen) for the difference in the distribution of relapse-free survival between the rituximab arm and the azathioprine (control) arm (two-sided at α-level of 5%). (NCT01697267)
Timeframe: Any patients who have not relapsed at up to a maximum of 4 years will be censored.
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Total number of patients with a relapse | Total number of patients with a relapse during treatment | Total number of patients with a relapse post treatment | |
Azathioprine Maintenance | 60 | 32 | 28 |
Rituximab Maintenance | 38 | 13 | 25 |
3 reviews available for prednisone and Microscopic Polyangiitis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Kaposi sarcoma in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a case-based review.
Topics: Aged; Cyclophosphamide; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Microscopic Polyangiitis; Prednisone | 2021 |
Microscopic Polyangiitis with Spinal Cord Involvement: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Biopsy; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Disease Progression; Fatal Outcome; Female; Glucocorticoid | 2016 |
Cyclophosphamide as induction therapy for Wegener's granulomatosis and microscopic polyangiitis.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Cyclophosphamide; Female; Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis; | 2011 |
4 trials available for prednisone and Microscopic Polyangiitis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Efficacy and safety of avacopan in Japanese patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: A subanalysis of a randomized Phase 3 study.
Topics: Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; | 2023 |
Outcomes of nonsevere relapses in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis treated with glucocorticoids.
Topics: Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; | 2015 |
Mycophenolate mofetil for induction and maintenance of remission in microscopic polyangiitis with mild to moderate renal involvement--a prospective, open-label pilot trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Drug A | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodi | 2010 |
6 other studies available for prednisone and Microscopic Polyangiitis
Article | Year |
---|---|
47-Year-Old Woman With Bilateral Flank Pain.
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Flank Pain; Glomerulonephritis; Humans; Meth | 2021 |
Avacopan, a selective C5a receptor antagonist, for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.
Topics: Aniline Compounds; Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Glucocorticoids; Gran | 2022 |
[Pharmacological and clinical profiles of avacopan (TAVNEOS
Topics: Animals; Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cyto | 2023 |
Polyangiitis overlap syndrome: a novel presentation of microscopic polyangiitis and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
Topics: Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Azathioprine; Churg-Strauss Syndrome; Cyclophosphamide; Fema | 2021 |
Rituximab prescription patterns and efficacy in the induction treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis in a Belgian multicenter cohort.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Antibodies, Antineutrophil | 2020 |
Microscopic polyangiitis presenting with peripheral and central neurological manifestations.
Topics: Action Potentials; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biopsy; Central Nervous System; Cyclophosphamide; Elect | 2011 |