Page last updated: 2024-11-07

prednisone and Androgen-Independent Prostatic Cancer

prednisone has been researched along with Androgen-Independent Prostatic Cancer in 310 studies

Prednisone: A synthetic anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid derived from CORTISONE. It is biologically inert and converted to PREDNISOLONE in the liver.
prednisone : A synthetic glucocorticoid drug that is particularly effective as an immunosuppressant, and affects virtually all of the immune system. Prednisone is a prodrug that is converted by the liver into prednisolone (a beta-hydroxy group instead of the oxo group at position 11), which is the active drug and also a steroid.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"The addition of radium-223 to abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or prednisolone did not improve symptomatic skeletal event-free survival in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases, and was associated with an increased frequency of bone fractures compared with placebo."9.30Addition of radium-223 to abiraterone acetate and prednisone or prednisolone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases (ERA 223): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. ( Boegemann, M; Heidenreich, A; Higano, C; Kakehi, Y; Karyakin, O; Kimura, G; Krissel, H; Matsubara, N; Matveev, V; Miller, K; Nahas, WC; Ng, QS; Nolè, F; Parker, C; Piulats, JM; Rosenbaum, E; Saad, F; Shen, J; Smith, M; Teufel, M; Tombal, B; Wagner, V; Zhang, A; Zucca, LE, 2019)
"AAP significantly improved outcomes in mCRPC patients compared with prednisone alone regardless of baseline pain and PSA level, and GS at primary diagnosis with no significant differences between observed treatment effects in groups 1 and 2."9.27The Phase 3 COU-AA-302 Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Men with Chemotherapy-naïve Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Stratified Analysis Based on Pain, Prostate-specific Antigen, and Gleason Score. ( Brookman-May, SD; Carles, J; Diels, J; Gschwend, JE; Miller, K; Van Poppel, H, 2018)
"Cabazitaxel significantly improves overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing during or after docetaxel, but is associated with a higher rate of grade ≥3 neutropenia compared with docetaxel."9.22Severe neutropenia during cabazitaxel treatment is associated with survival benefit in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A post-hoc analysis of the TROPIC phase III trial. ( de Bono, J; de Wit, R; Liewen, H; Meisel, A; Sartor, O; Stenner-Liewen, F; Vogt, DR; von Felten, S, 2016)
"The objective is to report the clinical case of a patient with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer who developed ascending flaccid paralysis secondary to severe hypokalemia, probably due to hyperaldosteronism secondary to the use of Abiraterone Acetate, despite the use of Prednisone."8.31Ascending Flaccid Paralysis Secondary to Hypokalemia in A Cancer Patient using Abiraterone - A Case Report. ( Cintra, MTG; Costa, AL; de Almeida, DCB; de Carvalho, FB; de Oliveira Faria, BL, 2023)
"To evaluate the association of the use of concomitant BRIs with overall survival (OS) and time to first SRE among patients with mCRPC and bone metastases receiving abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy."8.02Association of Concomitant Bone Resorption Inhibitors With Overall Survival Among Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Bone Metastases Receiving Abiraterone Acetate With Prednisone as First-Line Therapy. ( Alimohamed, NS; Bengala, C; Bryce, AH; Cigliola, A; Crivelli, F; Francini, E; Francini, G; Garcia-Foncillas, J; Gonzalez-Velez, M; Harshman, LC; Heng, DYC; Higano, CS; Lee-Ying, R; Montagnani, F; Moreno-Candilejo, I; Nuzzo, PV; Petrioli, R; Rosellini, P; Rubio-Perez, J; Shaw, GK; Sweeney, CJ; Zhang, L, 2021)
"Eight patients developed type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the AAP group and none in the enzalutamide group."7.11Fatigue, health-related quality-of-life and metabolic changes in men treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A randomised clinical trial (HEAT). ( Bisbjerg, R; Faber, J; Fode, M; Kistorp, C; Klausen, TW; Lindberg, H; Palapattu, G; Sønksen, J; Ternov, KK; Østergren, PB, 2022)
"Abiraterone plus prednisone delays patient-reported pain progression and HRQoL deterioration in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer."6.27Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: patient-reported outcome results of a randomised phase 3 trial. ( Autio, K; Basch, E; Cleeland, C; Fizazi, K; Griffin, T; Hao, Y; Kheoh, T; Li, S; Logothetis, CJ; Mainwaring, PN; Meyers, ML; Molina, A; Mulders, P; Rathkopf, D; Ryan, CJ; Shore, N; Smith, MR, 2013)
"In these prespecified exploratory analyses, there was no significant difference in pain or HRQOL when olaparib was added to abiraterone."5.51Patient-reported outcomes with olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial. ( Alekseev, B; Burgents, J; Chiuri, VE; Clarke, NW; Degboe, A; Fléchon, A; Gresty, C; Jassem, J; Jones, R; Kang, J; Kocak, I; Redfern, C; Saad, F; Sala, N; Thiery-Vuillemin, A; Wiechno, P, 2022)
"Abiraterone is an inhibitor of androgen biosynthesis indicated for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer."5.46Abiraterone-induced rhabdomyolysis: A case report. ( Moore, A; Moore, DC, 2017)
"Regorafenib has been proven to be an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option in patients with mCRPC progressing after docetaxel plus prednisone treatment."5.46Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Multikinase Regorafenib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Cicero, G; De Luca, R; Dieli, F, 2017)
"While abiraterone acetate (AA) has demonstrated survival benefit in advanced prostate cancer (APC), meaningful cardiotoxicity is observed."5.41Association between RCT methodology and disease indication with mineralocorticoid-related toxicity for patients receiving abiraterone acetate for advanced prostate cancer: A meta-analysis of RCTs. ( Hall, ME; Klaassen, Z; Laviana, AA; Luckenbaugh, AN; Magee, DE; Padgett, WJ; Satkunasivam, R; Schaffer, K; Wallis, CJD, 2023)
"The current study aims to provide an assessment of the impact of diabetes mellitus and its metformin treatment on the outcomes of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) within a pooled dataset of 3 clinical trials."5.30Impact of Diabetes on the Outcomes of Patients With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Docetaxel: A Pooled Analysis of Three Phase III Studies. ( Abdel-Rahman, O, 2019)
"The addition of radium-223 to abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or prednisolone did not improve symptomatic skeletal event-free survival in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases, and was associated with an increased frequency of bone fractures compared with placebo."5.30Addition of radium-223 to abiraterone acetate and prednisone or prednisolone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases (ERA 223): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. ( Boegemann, M; Heidenreich, A; Higano, C; Kakehi, Y; Karyakin, O; Kimura, G; Krissel, H; Matsubara, N; Matveev, V; Miller, K; Nahas, WC; Ng, QS; Nolè, F; Parker, C; Piulats, JM; Rosenbaum, E; Saad, F; Shen, J; Smith, M; Teufel, M; Tombal, B; Wagner, V; Zhang, A; Zucca, LE, 2019)
"AAP significantly improved outcomes in mCRPC patients compared with prednisone alone regardless of baseline pain and PSA level, and GS at primary diagnosis with no significant differences between observed treatment effects in groups 1 and 2."5.27The Phase 3 COU-AA-302 Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Men with Chemotherapy-naïve Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Stratified Analysis Based on Pain, Prostate-specific Antigen, and Gleason Score. ( Brookman-May, SD; Carles, J; Diels, J; Gschwend, JE; Miller, K; Van Poppel, H, 2018)
"Cabazitaxel significantly improves overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing during or after docetaxel, but is associated with a higher rate of grade ≥3 neutropenia compared with docetaxel."5.22Severe neutropenia during cabazitaxel treatment is associated with survival benefit in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A post-hoc analysis of the TROPIC phase III trial. ( de Bono, J; de Wit, R; Liewen, H; Meisel, A; Sartor, O; Stenner-Liewen, F; Vogt, DR; von Felten, S, 2016)
"When added to androgen deprivation, therapies demonstrating improved survival, improved quality of life (QOL), and favorable benefit-harm balance include abiraterone acetate/prednisone, enzalutamide, and radium-223 ((223)Ra; for men with predominantly bone metastases)."4.90Systemic therapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer:American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline. ( Basch, E; Bennett, CL; Carducci, M; Chen, RC; Dusetzina, SB; Frame, JN; Garrels, K; Hotte, S; Kattan, MW; Loblaw, DA; Oliver, TK; Raghavan, D; Rumble, RB; Saad, F; Taplin, ME; Virgo, KS; Walker-Dilks, C; Williams, J; Winquist, E; Wootton, T, 2014)
"The objective is to report the clinical case of a patient with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer who developed ascending flaccid paralysis secondary to severe hypokalemia, probably due to hyperaldosteronism secondary to the use of Abiraterone Acetate, despite the use of Prednisone."4.31Ascending Flaccid Paralysis Secondary to Hypokalemia in A Cancer Patient using Abiraterone - A Case Report. ( Cintra, MTG; Costa, AL; de Almeida, DCB; de Carvalho, FB; de Oliveira Faria, BL, 2023)
"To evaluate the association of the use of concomitant BRIs with overall survival (OS) and time to first SRE among patients with mCRPC and bone metastases receiving abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy."4.02Association of Concomitant Bone Resorption Inhibitors With Overall Survival Among Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Bone Metastases Receiving Abiraterone Acetate With Prednisone as First-Line Therapy. ( Alimohamed, NS; Bengala, C; Bryce, AH; Cigliola, A; Crivelli, F; Francini, E; Francini, G; Garcia-Foncillas, J; Gonzalez-Velez, M; Harshman, LC; Heng, DYC; Higano, CS; Lee-Ying, R; Montagnani, F; Moreno-Candilejo, I; Nuzzo, PV; Petrioli, R; Rosellini, P; Rubio-Perez, J; Shaw, GK; Sweeney, CJ; Zhang, L, 2021)
" Here we characterise the safety of these agents in subpopulations and assess manageability of key adverse events (AEs)."3.30Safety Profile of Ipatasertib Plus Abiraterone vs Placebo Plus Abiraterone in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. ( Bracarda, S; Chen, G; Chi, KN; de Bono, J; Garcia, J; Harris, A; Hinton, H; Massard, C; Matsubara, N; Olmos, D; Sandhu, S; Sane, R; Schenkel, F; Sternberg, CN; Sweeney, C, 2023)
"Ribociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, demonstrates preclinical antitumor activity in combination with taxanes."3.11A Phase Ib/II Study of the CDK4/6 Inhibitor Ribociclib in Combination with Docetaxel plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. ( Aggarwal, R; Carneiro, BA; de Kouchkovsky, I; Fong, L; Friedlander, T; Lewis, C; Paris, PL; Phone, A; Rao, A; Ryan, CJ; Small, EJ; Szmulewitz, RZ; Zhang, L, 2022)
"Eight patients developed type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the AAP group and none in the enzalutamide group."3.11Fatigue, health-related quality-of-life and metabolic changes in men treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A randomised clinical trial (HEAT). ( Bisbjerg, R; Faber, J; Fode, M; Kistorp, C; Klausen, TW; Lindberg, H; Palapattu, G; Sønksen, J; Ternov, KK; Østergren, PB, 2022)
" The results from this study suggest that dosing ipatasertib after an evening meal followed by overnight fasting can be an effective strategy for managing increased glucose levels."3.11Mitigating ipatasertib-induced glucose increase through dose and meal timing modifications. ( Agarwal, P; Gallo, JD; Hinton, H; Huang, KC; Miles, DR; Rasuo, G; Rotmensch, J; Sane, RS; Sutaria, DS, 2022)
" Treatment-emergent adverse events related to DCVAC/PCa or placebo occurred in 69 of 749 (9."3.11Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy, Docetaxel, and Prednisone vs Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The VIABLE Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. ( Bahl, A; Bartunkova, J; Beer, TM; Cheung, E; Csöszi, T; Feyerabend, S; Filipovic, Z; Fricke, H; Gerritsen, W; Goncalves, F; Hajek, J; Hussain, A; Hussain, S; Kadlecova, P; Khoo, V; Korolkiewicz, RP; Kukielka-Budny, B; Oudard, S; Prokhorov, A; Samal, V; Scheiner, T; Sousa, N; Spisek, R; Stenzl, A; Vogelzang, NJ; Wiechno, P, 2022)
"Niclosamide has preclinical activity against a wide range of cancers."3.01Phase Ib trial of reformulated niclosamide with abiraterone/prednisone in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer. ( Agarwal, N; Dall'Era, M; Evans, CP; Gao, AC; Lara, PN; Liu, C; Pan, CX; Parikh, M; Robles, D; Wu, CY, 2021)
" We evaluated bone scan lesion area (BSLA), a quantitative imaging assessment of response in patients with mCRPC receiving radium-223 alone or in combination with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (abiraterone/prednisone or enzalutamide)."3.01A randomized phase IIa study of quantified bone scan response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 dichloride alone or in combination with abiraterone acetate/prednisone or enzalutamide. ( Albany, C; Dawson, NA; Higano, CS; Mehlhaff, BA; Nordquist, LT; Patel, KR; Petrylak, DP; Quinn, DI; Sartor, O; Siegel, J; Trandafir, L; Vaishampayan, UN; Wagner, VJ, 2021)
"2%) had grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, the most common being thrombocytopenia (26."3.01Niraparib with androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: safety and pharmacokinetic results from a phase 1b study (BEDIVERE). ( Bradic, B; Chi, KN; De Meulder, M; Espina, BM; Francis, P; Graff, JN; Hayreh, V; Hazra, A; Lattouf, JB; Mamidi, RNVS; Posadas, EM; Rezazadeh Kalebasty, A; Saad, F; Shore, ND; Yu, A; Zhu, E, 2021)
" Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 58% versus 49% of older patients receiving cabazitaxel versus abiraterone/enzalutamide and 48% versus 42% of younger patients."3.01Efficacy and Safety of Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Older Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the CARD Study. ( Bamias, A; Carles, J; Castellano, D; de Bono, J; de Wit, R; Eymard, JC; Feyerabend, S; Fizazi, K; Geffriaud-Ricouard, C; Helissey, C; Iacovelli, R; Kramer, G; Melichar, B; Ozatilgan, A; Poole, EM; Sternberg, CN; Sverrisdóttir, Á; Theodore, C; Tombal, B; Wülfing, C, 2021)
"Treatment with apalutamide plus AA-P was well tolerated and showed evidence of antitumor activity in patients with mCRPC, including those with disease progression on AR signaling inhibitors."2.94Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Antitumor Effect of Apalutamide with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Phase Ib Study. ( Abrams, C; Attard, G; Chi, KN; Chien, C; de Jonge, MJA; de Wit, R; Friedlander, TW; Hellemans, P; Jiao, JJ; Posadas, EM; Saad, F; Yu, MK, 2020)
"The cumulative incidences of visceral metastases were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank testing."2.90Risk of development of visceral metastases subsequent to abiraterone vs placebo: An analysis of mode of radiographic progression in COU-AA-302. ( Antonarakis, ES; Carducci, MA; Denmeade, SR; Qiu, F; Teply, BA, 2019)
"Cabozantinib treatment did not demonstrate better pain palliation than mitoxantrone-prednisone in heavily pretreated patients with mCRPC and symptomatic bone metastases."2.90Cabozantinib Versus Mitoxantrone-prednisone in Symptomatic Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial with a Primary Pain Endpoint. ( Antonarakis, ES; Basch, EM; Bennett, AV; Chi, KN; Dayan, E; de Bono, JS; de Souza, P; Dreicer, R; Dueck, AC; George, S; Holland, J; Hutson, TE; Kalebasty, AR; Mangeshkar, M; Marx, G; O'Sullivan, JM; Scher, HI; Scholz, M; Schwarz, JK; Vaishampayan, U; Vogelzang, N; Weitzman, AL, 2019)
"Apatorsen treated patients received a median of 19 infusions."2.87A randomized phase 2 study of a HSP27 targeting antisense, apatorsen with prednisone versus prednisone alone, in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. ( Chi, KN; Ellard, SL; Gingerich, JR; Gleave, ME; Hotte, SJ; Joshua, AM; Yu, EY, 2018)
"Median time to radiographic evidence of disease progression was not reached but on sensitivity analysis in 15 patients it was estimated to be 41."2.87The IMAAGEN Study: Effect of Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone on Prostate Specific Antigen and Radiographic Disease Progression in Patients with Nonmetastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer. ( Crawford, ED; Francis, PSJ; Kantoff, PW; Londhe, A; McGowan, T; Phillips, J; Ryan, CJ; Shore, ND; Taplin, ME; Underwood, W, 2018)
" The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (32%), decreased appetite (25%), asthenia (18%), back pain (17%), and arthralgia (16%)."2.87Antitumour Activity and Safety of Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated with Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone for ≥24 weeks in Europe. ( Baron, B; Chowdhury, S; de Bono, JS; Elliott, T; Feyerabend, S; Fizazi, K; Grande, E; Hirmand, M; Melhem-Bertrandt, A; Werbrouck, P, 2018)
" Conclusion Low-dose AA (with low-fat breakfast) is noninferior to standard dosing with respect to PSA metrics."2.87Prospective International Randomized Phase II Study of Low-Dose Abiraterone With Food Versus Standard Dose Abiraterone In Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. ( Carthon, B; Chiong, E; Figg, WD; Fishkin, P; Harvey, RD; Ibraheem, A; Karrison, T; Kozloff, MF; Martinez, E; Nabhan, C; Peer, CJ; Ratain, MJ; Stadler, WM; Szmulewitz, RZ; Yong, WP, 2018)
" Long-term use of prednisone has been suggested as one of the mechanisms driving resistance, which may be reversed by switching to another steroid."2.87Phase II pilot study of the prednisone to dexamethasone switch in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with limited progression on abiraterone plus prednisone (SWITCH study). ( Attard, G; Castro, E; Cendón, Y; Correa, R; Cruz, JJ; Garcés, T; Grau, G; Gutierrez-Pecharoman, A; Herrera, B; Jayaram, A; López, PP; López-Campos, F; Lorente, D; Lozano, R; Montesa, A; Nombela, MP; Olmos, D; Pacheco, MI; Rivera, L; Romero-Laorden, N; Rosero, A; Saez, MI; Van de Poll, F; Villatoro, R, 2018)
" The aim of the SYNERGY trial was to investigate the effect of custirsen in combination with docetaxel and prednisone on overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer."2.84Custirsen in combination with docetaxel and prednisone for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (SYNERGY trial): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. ( Bergman, AM; Blumenstein, B; Chi, KN; de Bono, JS; Ferrero, JM; Feyerabend, S; Gleave, M; Gravis, G; Higano, CS; Jacobs, C; Merseburger, AS; Mukherjee, SD; Reeves, J; Saad, F; Stenzl, A; Zalewski, P, 2017)
" We aimed to assess whether custirsen in combination with cabazitaxel and prednisone increases overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel."2.84Custirsen (OGX-011) combined with cabazitaxel and prednisone versus cabazitaxel and prednisone alone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel (AFFINITY): a randomised, open-label, international, ph ( Alekseev, B; Beer, TM; Blumenstein, B; Chi, KN; Fizazi, K; Fléchon, A; Gravis, G; Hotte, SJ; Jacobs, CA; Joly, F; Malik, Z; Matveev, V; Saad, F; Stewart, PS, 2017)
"Cabozantinib is an inhibitor of kinases, including MET and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and has shown activity in men with previously treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)."2.82Phase III Study of Cabozantinib in Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: COMET-1. ( Bergman, A; Bögemann, M; Cruciani, G; De Bono, J; De Giorgi, U; De Wit, R; Feyerabend, S; Fizazi, K; Hessel, C; Hoelzer, W; Houédé, N; Hussain, S; Krainer, M; Lam, E; Le Moulec, S; Mainwaring, P; Miller, K; Oudard, S; Polikoff, J; Ramies, D; Saad, F; Smith, M; Stenzl, A; Sternberg, C; Thiery-Vuillemin, A; Weitzman, A, 2016)
"Abiraterone acetate-prednisone treatment significantly decreased prostate-specific antigen progression risk by 49%, with longer median time to prostate-specific antigen progression of 5."2.82Abiraterone acetate for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel failure: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 bridging study. ( Chen, Z; De Porre, P; Du, C; Feng, Y; Huang, Y; Jin, J; Li, C; Lin, G; Liu, W; Shan, Y; Sun, Y; Sun, Z; Xie, L; Ye, D; Ye, ZQ; Zou, Q, 2016)
" To establish safety, lenalidomide dosing in this combination was escalated in a conventional 3 + 3 design (15, 20 and 25 mg daily for 2 weeks followed by 1 week off)."2.82Phase II trial of docetaxel, bevacizumab, lenalidomide and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ( Adesunloye, BA; Arlen, PM; Beedie, SL; Chen, C; Chun, G; Cordes, L; Couvillon, A; Dahut, WL; Dawson, NA; Figg, WD; Gulley, JL; Harold, N; Huang, X; Karzai, FH; Lee, MJ; Lee, S; Madan, RA; McLeod, DG; Ning, YM; Rosner, I; Sissung, T; Steinberg, SM; Theoret, MR; Tomita, Y; Trepel, JB, 2016)
"This was a phase I/II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of alisertib when given in combination with abiraterone plus prednisone (AP)."2.82A Phase I/II Study of the Investigational Drug Alisertib in Combination With Abiraterone and Prednisone for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Progressing on Abiraterone. ( Cristofanilli, M; Hoffman-Censits, JH; Kelly, WK; Kennedy, B; Kilpatrick, D; Leiby, B; Lewis, N; Lin, J; Mu, Z; Patel, SA; Sama, AR; Yang, H; Ye, Z, 2016)
"Orteronel (TAK-700) is an investigational, nonsteroidal, reversible, selective 17,20-lyase inhibitor."2.80Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone with placebo plus prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that has progressed during or after docetaxel-based therapy: ( Agarwal, N; Agus, D; Bellmunt, J; Borgstein, N; Carcano, F; Cruz, FM; De Bono, J; de Wit, R; Dreicer, R; Efstathiou, E; Fizazi, K; Fountzilas, G; Jones, R; Lee, SY; Oudard, S; Petrylak, DP; Saad, F; Tejura, B; Ulys, A; Webb, IJ, 2015)
" Specific adverse events with abiraterone-prednisone were similar between the age subgroups."2.80Efficacy and Safety of Abiraterone Acetate in Elderly (75 Years or Older) Chemotherapy Naïve Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer. ( Carles, J; Griffin, TW; Kheoh, T; Li, J; Molina, A; Mulders, PF; Rathkopf, DE; Ryan, CJ; Smith, MR; Van Poppel, H, 2015)
" Short-term dosing with food did not alter abiraterone acetate safety."2.80Food effects on abiraterone pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects and patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ( Acharya, M; Bernard, A; Chi, KN; Chien, C; Gonzalez, M; Griffin, TW; Jiao, J; Kheoh, T; Kollmannsberger, C; North, S; Pankras, C; Peng, L; Spratlin, J; Stieltjes, H; Tran, NP; Yu, MK, 2015)
"We conducted an open-label, single-arm Phase I/II clinical trial in metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) patients eligible for docetaxel combined with treatment with autologous mature dendritic cells (DCs) pulsed with killed LNCaP prostate cancer cells (DCVAC/PCa)."2.80Phase I/II clinical trial of dendritic-cell based immunotherapy (DCVAC/PCa) combined with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. ( Babjuk, M; Bartunkova, J; Becht, E; Bilkova, P; Fucikova, J; Gasova, Z; Horvath, R; Hromadkova, H; Jarolim, L; Kayserova, J; Kubackova, K; Lastovicka, J; Podrazil, M; Rozkova, D; Sochorova, K; Spisek, R; Vavrova, K; Vrabcova, P, 2015)
"Mitoxantrone was approved for use in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) based on pain palliation without observed survival benefit in a small phase III trial in 1996."2.80Comparative effectiveness of mitoxantrone plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel failure. ( Basch, E; Corty, RW; Dusetzina, SB; Green, AK; Meeneghan, M; Milowsky, MI; Reeder-Hayes, KE; Wood, WA, 2015)
" No grade 3-4 adverse events were observed."2.80Safety of Abiraterone Acetate in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients With Concomitant Cardiovascular Risk Factors. ( de Braud, F; Grassi, P; Procopio, G; Salvioni, R; Testa, I; Torri, V; Valdagni, R; Verzoni, E, 2015)
"Orteronel is an investigational, partially selective inhibitor of CYP 17,20-lyase in the androgen signalling pathway, a validated therapeutic target for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer."2.80Orteronel plus prednisone in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ELM-PC 4): a double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. ( Akaza, H; de Wit, R; Dreicer, R; Efstathiou, E; Fizazi, K; Fong, PC; Hart, LL; Jinga, V; Jones, R; MacLean, DB; McDermott, R; Nelson, J; Saad, F; Scher, HI; Suzuki, K; Wang, L; Webb, IJ; Wirth, M, 2015)
"Orteronel (TAK-700) is an investigational, selective, non-steroidal inhibitor of 17,20-lyase, a key enzyme in androgenic hormone production."2.80Phase 1/2 study of orteronel (TAK-700), an investigational 17,20-lyase inhibitor, with docetaxel-prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ( Agus, DB; Bargfrede, M; Carthon, B; Clark, WR; Gandhi, JG; Heath, E; Kong, N; Lin, J; Liu, G; Moran, S; Oh, WK; Petrylak, DP; Suri, A, 2015)
"Visceral disease, non-nodal soft-tissue metastases predominantly involving the lung and liver, is a negative prognostic factor in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)."2.79Exploratory analysis of the visceral disease subgroup in a phase III study of abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ( de Bono, JS; Fizazi, K; Flaig, TW; Goodman, OB; Kheoh, T; Li, J; Molina, A; Mulders, PF; Scher, HI; Suttmann, H, 2014)
" Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 62% of elderly patients and in 60% of patients aged <75 yr treated with AA plus P."2.79Efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate in an elderly patient subgroup (aged 75 and older) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel-based chemotherapy. ( Chi, KN; Fizazi, K; Haqq, CM; Higano, CS; Kheoh, T; Li, J; Marberger, M; Molina, A; Mulders, PF; Saad, F, 2014)
"Treatment with abiraterone acetate and prednisone was well tolerated by patients who were treated for >2 yr."2.79Updated interim efficacy analysis and long-term safety of abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without prior chemotherapy (COU-AA-302). ( Beer, TM; Carles, J; de Bono, JS; de Souza, P; Efstathiou, E; Fizazi, K; Flaig, TW; Fradet, Y; Griffin, TW; Hainsworth, JD; Higano, CS; Kheoh, T; Logothetis, CJ; Mainwaring, P; Molina, A; Mulders, PF; North, S; Park, YC; Rathkopf, DE; Ryan, CJ; Saad, F; Scher, HI; Shore, ND; Small, EJ; Smith, MR; Taplin, ME; Todd, MB; Van Poppel, H; Yu, EY; Yu, MK, 2014)
") in combination with prednisone for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)."2.78Abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: U.S. Food and Drug Administration drug approval summary. ( Aziz, R; Ghosh, D; Ibrahim, A; Justice, R; Kluetz, PG; Maher, VE; Mehrotra, N; Ning, YM; Palmby, T; Pazdur, R; Pfuma, E; Sridhara, R; Tang, S; Tilley, A; Zhang, L; Zirkelbach, JF, 2013)
"Cabazitaxel has been approved as the second line treatment to docetaxel in mCRPC."2.66Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for castrate-resistant prostate cancer. ( Abou Chakra, M; Dellis, A; Moussa, M; Papatsoris, A; Sryropoulou, D, 2020)
" Abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone was the first approved hormone therapy demonstrating survival benefit, and represents, to date, an alternative, or a second-line treatment after taxane-based chemotherapy, in addition to androgen-deprivation therapy, in hormone sensitive, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer."2.66Abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone in the treatment of prostate cancer: safety and efficacy. ( Manceau, C; Mourey, L; Ploussard, G; Pouessel, D, 2020)
"Abiraterone has been proven to be an effective agent used in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, significantly improving overall and progression-free survival."2.61Management of anticoagulation in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving abiraterone + prednisone. ( Dubinsky, S; Emmenegger, U; McFarlane, TRJ; McLeod, AG; Thawer, A, 2019)
" This review will cover the current use of abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer."2.61Abiraterone acetate to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in combination with prednisone. ( Duarte, C; Jimeno, A; Kessler, ER, 2019)
" We analyzed the main outcomes, including the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, tumor response and severe adverse events (AEs)."2.58The efficacy and safety comparison of docetaxel, cabazitaxel, estramustine, and mitoxantrone for castration-resistant prostate cancer: A network meta-analysis. ( Huang, C; Song, P; Wang, Y, 2018)
"Prednisone was also significantly associated with PFS after adjusting for docetaxel status."2.58Effect of Single-agent Daily Prednisone on Outcomes and Toxicities in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Studies. ( Ghatalia, P; Pond, GR; Sonpavde, G; Templeton, AJ, 2018)
"One patient experienced disease progression."2.50[Use of abiraterone acetate in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer and no prior chemotherapy: 3 case reports and literature review]. ( Ma, H; Wan, B; Wang, JY; Wu, PJ; Zhu, G, 2014)
"Cabazitaxel is an effective second line cytotoxic agent that improves survival; studies are underway comparing cabazitaxel to docetaxel as first line chemotherapy."2.50Practical guide to the use of chemotherapy in castration resistant prostate cancer. ( Petrylak, DP, 2014)
"Abiraterone acetate (Zytiga(®)) is an orally administered, selective inhibitor of the 17α-hydroxylase and C17,20-lyase enzymatic activities of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 17."2.49Abiraterone acetate: a review of its use in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ( Hoy, SM, 2013)
"Visceral metastasis (VM) and a higher number of bone metastasis generally define high volume/risk in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC)."1.91Visceral Metastasis Predicts Response to New Hormonal Agents in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. ( Choueiri, TK; Gillessen, S; McKay, RR; Ürün, Y; Yekedüz, E, 2023)
"Abiraterone acetate is an antiandrogen steroidal drug that is used to treat patients with metastatic prostate cancer."1.72Synthesis and characterization of epoxide impurities of abiraterone acetate. ( Mirjafary, Z; Mohammad Hossein Shirazi, S; Mokhtari, J, 2022)
" Baseline characteristics, safety (treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent severe adverse events), and efficacy [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] were analyzed."1.62Real-World Safety and Efficacy Outcomes with Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone or Prednisolone as the First- or Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Data from the Prostate Cancer Registry. ( Birtle, A; Bjartell, A; Chowdhury, S; Costa, L; Feyerabend, S; Gomez-Veiga, F; Kalinka, E; Kramer, G; Lefresne, F; Lukac, M; Lumen, N; Maroto, P; Matveev, V; Paiss, T; Spaëth, D; Wapenaar, R, 2021)
" Other adverse reactions such as fever, debilitation, and alopecia were also observed."1.62Efficacy and safety of docetaxel and prednisolone chemotherapy in very elderly men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in real world: a single institute experience. ( Hu, YC; Jiang, JH; Ma, L; Ma, Q; Wang, KY; Zhang, LL, 2021)
"Treatment with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide is one of the approved approaches in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the post-docetaxel setting."1.56Predictors of resistance to abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in post-docetaxel setting: a single-center cohort study. ( Eterović, D; Omrčen, T; Vrdoljak, E, 2020)
" Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a prodrug of abiraterone, which is an irreversible inhibitor of 17α-hydroxylase/C17, 20-lyase."1.56[Early- vs. late-onset treatment using abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in chemo-naïve, asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with metastatic CRPC after androgen deprivation therapy]. ( Baurecht, W; Belz, H; Bögemann, M; Feyerabend, S; Kruetzfeldt, K; Merseburger, AS; Rüssel, C; Spiegelhalder, P; Tran, N, 2020)
" Pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed at two consecutive visits at least 4 weeks apart."1.51Inter- and intra-patient variability in pharmacokinetics of abiraterone acetate in metastatic prostate cancer. ( Arasaratnam, M; Bhatnagar, A; Crumbaker, M; Gurney, H; McKay, MJ; Molloy, MP, 2019)
"Cabazitaxel is a treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after docetaxel failure."1.51Overall and progression-free survival with cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in routine clinical practice: the FUJI cohort. ( Balestra, A; Droz-Perroteau, C; Fizazi, K; Fourrier-Reglat, A; Guiard, E; Joly, F; Jove, J; Lacueille, C; Lamarque, S; Moore, N; Oudard, S; Rouyer, M; Tubach, F, 2019)
"Abiraterone is an oral inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (17alpha)-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase (CYP17) complex critical to androgen production."1.51Abiraterone experience in a patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer on hemodialysis. ( Karaağaç, M; Karakurt Eryılmaz, M, 2019)
"Fatigue was commonly linked to poor HRQoL and responses indicated that significantly fewer patients in the AAP group reported feeling usually tired or fatigued in the last week compared to the ENZ group (33% vs."1.51Fatigue, treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life among patients receiving novel drugs suppressing androgen signalling for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. ( Artenie, C; Dearden, L; Gater, A; Grant, L; Jackson, C; Mills, A; Shalet, N, 2019)
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is an androgen receptor axis inhibitor, indicated together with prednisone, for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer."1.48Long-term abiraterone withdrawal syndrome. ( Campins, L; Font, A; Lianes, P; Marin, S; Miarons, M; Querol, R, 2018)
" The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse event in both the AA + prednisone and prednisone-alone groups was elevated alanine aminotransferase level in 5 of 43 patients (11."1.48Abiraterone acetate for chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a single-centre prospective study of efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors. ( Chi, C; Dong, B; Fan, L; Gong, Y; Huang, Y; Pan, J; Sha, J; Shangguan, X; Wang, Y; Xue, W; Zhou, L, 2018)
"Regorafenib has been proven to be an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option in patients with mCRPC progressing after docetaxel plus prednisone treatment."1.46Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Multikinase Regorafenib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. ( Cicero, G; De Luca, R; Dieli, F, 2017)
"Abiraterone is an inhibitor of androgen biosynthesis indicated for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer."1.46Abiraterone-induced rhabdomyolysis: A case report. ( Moore, A; Moore, DC, 2017)
"Abiraterone is a well-tolerated and effective treatment modality for patients affected with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer."1.46Treatment with abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients progressing after docetaxel: a retrospective study. ( Blasi, L; Cicero, G; De Luca, R; Dieli, F; Pavone, C; Pepe, A; Simonato, A, 2017)
"Eplerenone is a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist demonstrated to abrogate mineralocorticoid excess."1.46Efficacy of Eplerenone in the Management of Mineralocorticoid Excess in Men With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Abiraterone Without Prednisone. ( Agarwal, N; Alex, A; Bailey, E; Batten, J; Boucher, K; Gaston, D; Gill, D; Gupta, S; Hahn, A; Stenehjem, D, 2017)
"Prednisone use was associated with a reduced risk of progression on docetaxel in the propensity score-weighted multivariable Cox model (P=0."1.43The influence of prednisone on the efficacy of docetaxel in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ( Antonarakis, ES; Denmeade, SR; Luber, B; Teply, BA, 2016)
"To investigate whether long-term use of low-dose P with or without AA leads to corticosteroid-associated adverse events (CA-AEs) in mCRPC patients."1.43Low Incidence of Corticosteroid-associated Adverse Events on Long-term Exposure to Low-dose Prednisone Given with Abiraterone Acetate to Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. ( Charnas, R; Chi, KN; de Bono, JS; De Porre, P; Fizazi, K; Gomella, LG; Londhe, A; McGowan, T; Miller, K; Montgomery, B; Pelhivanov, N; Rathkopf, DE; Ryan, CJ; Scher, HI; Shore, ND; Todd, MB, 2016)
"Treatment with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AA/P) prolongs survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients."1.43Common Genetic Variation in CYP17A1 and Response to Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. ( Binder, M; Hillman, DW; Kohli, M; Kohli, R; Kohli, T; Lee, A; Zhang, BY, 2016)
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) has demonstrated improved outcomes in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)."1.42Exploring the Clinical Benefit of Docetaxel or Enzalutamide After Disease Progression During Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone Treatment in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. ( Armstrong, AJ; Chin, B; Dhawan, MS; George, DJ; Harrison, MR; Healy, P; Oldan, J; Zhang, T, 2015)
"Abiraterone is a CYP17A1 inhibitor that improves survival in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)."1.40Tumour responses following a steroid switch from prednisone to dexamethasone in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients progressing on abiraterone. ( Altavilla, A; Attard, G; de Bono, J; Dearnaley, D; Ferraldeschi, R; Gillessen, S; Lorente, D; Mateo, J; Omlin, A; Parker, C; Perez, R; Pezaro, C; Tunariu, N; Zafeirou, Z, 2014)
"Cabazitaxel/prednisone has been shown to prolong survival versus mitoxantrone/prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed during or after docetaxel."1.40Safety of cabazitaxel in senior adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of the European compassionate-use programme. ( Bracarda, S; Climent, MA; Fossa, S; Heidenreich, A; Hitier, S; Mason, M; Ozen, H; Papandreou, C; Sengelov, L; Van Oort, I, 2014)
"Abiraterone acetate seems to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer irrespective of the number of chemotherapy lines administered previously."1.40Abiraterone in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. ( Bianco, V; Fiaschi, AI; Francini, E; Francini, F; Laera, L; Paganini, G; Perrella, A; Petrioli, R; Roviello, G, 2014)
"Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a prodrug of abiraterone, a novel androgen biosynthesis inhibitor."1.40Adherence patterns for abiraterone acetate and concomitant prednisone use in patients with prostate cancer. ( Ellis, L; Grittner, AM; Kozma, C; Lafeuille, MH; Lefebvre, P; McKenzie, RS; Slaton, T, 2014)
" There was no relation between dosage and age (p=0."1.39Analysis of docetaxel therapy in elderly (≥70 years) castration resistant prostate cancer patients enrolled in the Netherlands Prostate Study. ( Blaisse, RJ; de Wit, R; Erjavec, Z; Gerritse, FL; Los, M; Meulenbeld, HJ; Roodhart, JM; Smilde, TJ; van der Velden, AM, 2013)
" Only 1 patient experienced a grade 4 adverse event due to a nonsymptomatic pulmonary embolism."1.39Safety and efficacy of maintenance therapy with a nonspecific cytochrome P17 inhibitor (CYP17i) after response/stabilization to docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ( Arévalo, E; Carranza, OE; Castañón, E; Castillo, A; Collado-Gómez, V; Fusco, JP; Gil-Aldea, I; Gil-Bazo, I; López, I; Zudaire, ME, 2013)

Research

Studies (310)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's0 (0.00)29.6817
2010's212 (68.39)24.3611
2020's98 (31.61)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Saad, F26
Efstathiou, E9
Attard, G12
Flaig, TW8
Franke, F1
Goodman, OB2
Oudard, S8
Steuber, T1
Suzuki, H2
Wu, D3
Yeruva, K1
De Porre, P16
Brookman-May, S1
Li, S5
Li, J14
Thomas, S1
Bevans, KB1
Mundle, SD3
McCarthy, SA1
Rathkopf, DE13
Pujalte Martin, M1
Borchiellini, D1
Thamphya, B1
Guillot, A2
Paoli, JB1
Besson, D1
Hilgers, W2
Priou, F1
El Kouri, C1
Hoch, B1
Deville, JL1
Schiappa, R1
Cheli, S1
Milano, G1
Tanti, JF1
Bost, F1
Ferrero, JM2
Sartor, O8
George, D1
Tombal, B7
Agarwal, N7
Higano, CS14
Sternberg, CN11
Miller, K9
Jiao, X2
Guo, H1
Sandström, P1
Bruno, A1
Verholen, F1
Shore, N5
Tresnanda, RI1
Pramod, SV1
Safriadi, F1
Ataikiru, O1
Abdelsalam, M1
Avileli, M1
Hynes, T1
Baciarello, G3
Özgüroğlu, M1
Mundle, S1
Leitz, G1
Richarz, U1
Hu, P2
Feyerabend, S11
Matsubara, N5
Chi, KN23
Fizazi, K34
Vogelzang, NJ6
Beer, TM6
Gerritsen, W1
Wiechno, P3
Kukielka-Budny, B1
Samal, V1
Hajek, J1
Khoo, V1
Stenzl, A3
Csöszi, T1
Filipovic, Z1
Goncalves, F1
Prokhorov, A1
Cheung, E1
Hussain, A2
Sousa, N1
Bahl, A1
Hussain, S2
Fricke, H1
Kadlecova, P1
Scheiner, T1
Korolkiewicz, RP1
Bartunkova, J2
Spisek, R2
de Kouchkovsky, I1
Rao, A2
Carneiro, BA1
Zhang, L4
Lewis, C1
Phone, A1
Small, EJ19
Friedlander, T1
Fong, L3
Paris, PL2
Ryan, CJ27
Szmulewitz, RZ3
Aggarwal, R2
Mohammad Hossein Shirazi, S1
Mokhtari, J1
Mirjafary, Z1
Yu, EY5
Kolinsky, MP2
Berry, WR2
Retz, M2
Mourey, L3
Piulats, JM3
Appleman, LJ1
Romano, E1
Gravis, G3
Gurney, H3
Bögemann, M3
Emmenegger, U2
Joshua, AM8
Linch, M2
Sridhar, S1
Conter, HJ1
Laguerre, B1
Massard, C4
Li, XT1
Schloss, C1
Poehlein, CH2
de Bono, JS24
Galli, L3
Chiuri, VE4
Di Lorenzo, G1
Pisconti, S1
Rossetti, S4
Sirotova, Z1
Muto, A1
Petrioli, R7
De Tursi, M1
Sbrana, A1
Francolini, G1
Ardizzoia, A1
Scavelli, C1
Satta, F1
Quadrini, S1
Airoldi, M2
D'Aniello, C1
Bonetti, A1
Conforti, S1
Aieta, M3
Beccaglia, P2
Maestri, A1
Fratino, L2
Procopio, G3
Giordano, M2
Alitto, AR1
Maisano, R1
Bordonaro, R1
Cinieri, S1
De Placido, S1
Gasparro, D2
Ludovico, GM1
Guglielmini, PF1
Carella, C1
Nova, P1
Aglietta, M2
Schips, L1
Sciarra, A1
Livi, L1
Santini, D2
James, ND2
Clarke, NW3
Cook, A1
Ali, A1
Hoyle, AP1
Brawley, CD1
Chowdhury, S3
Cross, WR1
Dearnaley, DP1
Diaz-Montana, C1
Gilbert, D1
Gillessen, S4
Gilson, C1
Jones, RJ2
Langley, RE1
Malik, ZI1
Matheson, DJ1
Millman, R1
Parker, CC1
Pugh, C1
Rush, H1
Russell, JM1
Berthold, DR1
Buckner, ML1
Mason, MD1
Ritchie, AWS1
Birtle, AJ1
Brock, SJ1
Das, P1
Ford, D1
Gale, J1
Grant, W1
Gray, EK1
Hoskin, P1
Khan, MM1
Manetta, C1
McPhail, NJ1
O'Sullivan, JM3
Parikh, O1
Perna, C1
Pezaro, CJ2
Protheroe, AS1
Robinson, AJ1
Rudman, SM1
Sheehan, DJ1
Srihari, NN1
Syndikus, I1
Tanguay, JS1
Thomas, CW1
Vengalil, S1
Wagstaff, J1
Wylie, JP1
Parmar, MKB2
Sydes, MR1
Ohlmann, CH2
Jäschke, M1
Jaehnig, P1
Krege, S1
Gschwend, J2
Rexer, H1
Junker, K1
Zillmann, R1
Rüssel, C2
Hellmis, E1
Suttmann, H2
Janssen, M1
Marin, J1
Hübner, A1
Mathers, M1
Gleißner, J1
Scheffler, M1
Telle, J1
Klier, J1
Stöckle, M3
de Almeida, DCB1
Costa, AL1
de Oliveira Faria, BL1
de Carvalho, FB1
Cintra, MTG1
Wilson, BE1
Armstrong, AJ9
de Bono, J10
Scher, HI21
Smith, MR14
Rathkopf, D4
Logothetis, CJ9
Tran, N5
Carles, J7
Ternov, KK2
Sønksen, J2
Fode, M2
Lindberg, H2
Kistorp, C2
Bisbjerg, R1
Faber, J1
Klausen, TW2
Palapattu, G2
Østergren, PB2
Cattrini, C1
Messina, C2
Mennitto, A1
Di Maio, M1
Gennari, A1
Olmos, D8
Ah-Thiane, L1
Supiot, S1
Thiery-Vuillemin, A3
Alekseev, B2
Sala, N1
Jones, R3
Kocak, I1
Jassem, J1
Fléchon, A4
Redfern, C1
Kang, J1
Burgents, J2
Gresty, C1
Degboe, A1
Sicotte, H2
Kalari, KR2
Qin, S2
Dehm, SM2
Bhargava, V2
Gormley, M2
Tan, W3
Sinnwell, JP1
Hillman, DW4
Li, Y4
Vedell, PT2
Carlson, RE2
Bryce, AH4
Jimenez, RE1
Weinshilboum, RM2
Kohli, M5
Wang, L10
Sutaria, DS1
Agarwal, P1
Huang, KC1
Miles, DR1
Rotmensch, J1
Hinton, H2
Gallo, JD1
Rasuo, G1
Sane, RS1
Koroki, Y3
Taguri, M3
Mellado, B4
Shah, S1
Hauke, R1
Costin, D1
Adra, N1
Cullberg, M1
Teruel, CF1
Morris, T1
Fiala, O1
Hosek, P1
Korunkova, H1
Hora, M1
Kolar, J1
Windrichova, J1
Sorejs, O1
Topolcan, O1
Travnicek, I1
Sedlackova, H1
Finek, J1
Wang, MH1
Dai, JD1
Zhang, XM1
Zhao, JG1
Sun, GX1
Zeng, YH1
Zeng, H4
Xu, NW1
Shen, PF1
Sweeney, C1
Sandhu, S3
Garcia, J1
Chen, G1
Harris, A1
Schenkel, F1
Sane, R1
Bracarda, S2
Gu, T1
Chen, T1
Zhu, Q1
Ding, J1
Nuzzo, PV2
Pederzoli, F1
Saieva, C1
Zanardi, E1
Fotia, G1
Malgeri, A1
Valenca Bueno, L1
Andrade, LMQS1
Patrikidou, A1
Mestre, RP1
Modesti, M1
Pignata, S1
Fornarini, G1
De Giorgi, U5
Russo, A1
Francini, E5
Oyenuga, M1
Halabi, S11
Oyenuga, A1
McSweeney, S1
Morgans, AK2
Prizment, A1
Roy, S2
Sun, Y4
Morgan, SC2
Wallis, CJD3
King, K1
Zhou, YM1
D'souza, LA1
Azem, O1
Cueto-Marquez, AE1
Camden, NB1
Spratt, DE3
Kishan, AU2
Malone, S2
Lee, JY1
Pereira de Santana Gomes, AJ2
Roubaud, G3
Saad, M2
Zurawski, B1
Sakalo, V1
Mason, GE3
Francis, P3
Wang, G1
Diorio, B2
Lopez-Gitlitz, A1
Fleshner, N1
Van Bruwaene, S1
Hafron, J1
McNeel, DG1
Maul, RS1
Daksh, M1
Zhong, X1
Tutrone, RF2
Morris, MJ8
Heller, G1
Bobek, O1
Ryan, C2
Antonarakis, ES6
Hahn, O1
Beltran, H1
Schwartz, L1
Lewis, LD1
Beumer, JH1
Langevin, B1
McGary, EC1
Mehan, PT1
Goldkorn, A2
Roth, BJ1
Xiao, H1
Watt, C1
Taplin, ME9
Le, ATT1
Malone, J1
Yekedüz, E1
McKay, RR1
Choueiri, TK1
Ürün, Y1
Sjöström, M1
Bjartell, A2
Bischoff, H1
Barthélémy, P1
Hall, ME1
Padgett, WJ1
Klaassen, Z1
Magee, DE1
Luckenbaugh, AN1
Laviana, AA1
Satkunasivam, R1
Schaffer, K1
Liu, M1
Yan, J1
Le, K1
Xing, N1
Li, G1
Park, SH1
Goh, JC1
Shin, SJ1
Lee, JL1
Mehra, N3
McDermott, R2
Sala-Gonzalez, N2
Fong, PC2
Greil, R1
Sade, JP1
Yanez, P1
Huang, YH1
Begbie, SD1
Gafanov, RA1
De Santis, M1
Rosenbaum, E2
Rey, F1
Chiu, KY1
Kramer, G6
Sumitomo, M1
Massari, F1
Qiu, P1
Zhang, J1
Kim, J2
Castro, E3
Jung, W1
Dibaj, S1
Urtishak, K1
Del Corral, A1
Kim, W2
Yoo, M1
Nelson, RE1
Haaland, B1
Dougherty, M1
Cutshall, ZA1
Kohli, R2
Beckstead, R1
Slovin, SF1
Knudsen, K1
de Leeuw, R1
Shafi, A1
Kang, P1
Wolf, S1
Luo, B1
Gopalan, A1
Curley, T1
Fleming, M1
Molina, A17
Fernandez, C1
Kelly, K1
Tsujino, T1
Tokushige, S1
Komura, K1
Fukuokaya, W1
Adachi, T1
Hirasawa, Y1
Hashimoto, T1
Yoshizawa, A1
Saruta, M1
Ohno, T1
Nakamori, K1
Maenosono, R1
Nishimura, K1
Yamazaki, S1
Uchimoto, T1
Yanagisawa, T1
Mori, K1
Urabe, F1
Tsuzuki, S1
Iwatani, K1
Yamamoto, S1
Takahara, K1
Inamoto, T1
Kimura, T1
Ohno, Y1
Shiroki, R1
Azuma, H1
Martini, A1
Fallara, G1
Ploussard, G3
Malavaud, B1
Shore, ND11
Saltzstein, D1
Sieber, P1
Mehlhaff, B1
Gervasi, L1
Phillips, J2
Wong, YN1
Pei, H1
McGowan, T4
Mizokami, A2
Kimura, G3
Fujii, Y2
Hinotsu, S1
Izumi, K1
George, DJ6
Healy, P3
Barak, I1
Winters, C2
Anand, M2
Wilder, R2
Klein, M1
Martinez, E2
Nixon, AB1
Harrison, MR3
Szmulewitz, R1
Knechel, MA1
Schmidt, KT1
Figg, WD5
de Wit, R13
Wülfing, C2
Eymard, JC4
Bamias, A2
Iacovelli, R3
Melichar, B2
Sverrisdóttir, Á2
Theodore, C2
Helissey, C2
Ozatilgan, A2
Geffriaud-Ricouard, C2
Castellano, D6
Poulsen, MH1
Lagneau, E1
Birtle, A3
Dourthe, LM2
Beal-Ardisson, D1
Pintus, E1
Trepiakas, R1
Lefresne, F2
Lukac, M3
Van Sanden, S2
Pissart, G2
Reid, A1
Karakurt Eryılmaz, M1
Karaağaç, M1
Roviello, G7
Sobhani, N1
Corona, SP1
D'Angelo, A2
Griebling, TL1
Chan, J1
Yap, SY1
Fong, YC1
Lim, HC1
Toh, CK1
Ng, QS2
Rajasekaran, T1
Chua, M1
Lee, LS1
Wong, A2
Loh, KY1
Chow, M1
Wong, SW1
Kanesvaran, R1
Rouyer, M1
Joly, F3
Tubach, F1
Jove, J1
Lacueille, C1
Lamarque, S1
Guiard, E1
Balestra, A1
Droz-Perroteau, C1
Fourrier-Reglat, A1
Moore, N1
Khalaf, DJ3
Annala, M2
Taavitsainen, S2
Finch, DL2
Oja, C2
Vergidis, J2
Zulfiqar, M2
Sunderland, K2
Azad, AA3
Kollmannsberger, CK2
Eigl, BJ3
Noonan, K1
Wadhwa, D2
Attwell, A1
Keith, B1
Ellard, SL2
Le, L1
Gleave, ME3
Wyatt, AW2
Perualila, NJ1
Diels, J2
Ito, T1
Sidaway, P3
Uemura, H2
Nakamura, M1
Nagamori, S1
Kikukawa, H1
Hosono, M1
Kinuya, S1
Krissel, H2
Siegel, J2
Kakehi, Y2
Ramaswamy, K1
Lechpammer, S1
Mardekian, J1
Huang, A1
Schultz, NM1
Sandin, R1
Baser, O1
Colomba, E1
Marret, G1
Lavaud, P1
Loriot, Y2
Albiges, L1
Carton, E1
Alexandre, J1
Huillard, O1
Culine, S2
Carretero-González, A1
Lora, D1
Manneh, R1
Lorente, D5
de Velasco, G1
Du, M1
Tian, Y2
Kilari, D1
Huang, CC1
Merseburger, AS2
Belz, H1
Spiegelhalder, P1
Kruetzfeldt, K1
Baurecht, W1
Dutta, S3
Kelly, WK8
Middleberg, R1
Russell, C2
Tangen, CM3
Rosenthal, M3
Petrylak, DP13
Thompson, IM3
Araujo, JC4
Logothetis, C2
Eisenberger, MA3
Quinn, DI4
Tannock, IF6
Hess, BA1
Posadas, EM3
de Jonge, MJA1
Friedlander, TW2
Yu, MK10
Hellemans, P1
Chien, C2
Abrams, C1
Jiao, JJ1
Kalinovsky, J1
Tangirala, K1
Moussa, M1
Papatsoris, A1
Abou Chakra, M1
Sryropoulou, D1
Dellis, A1
Omrčen, T1
Eterović, D1
Vrdoljak, E1
Manceau, C1
Pouessel, D1
Sheng, IY1
Fallah, J1
Gupta, R1
Li, H1
Allman, K1
Martin, A1
Barata, P1
Ornstein, MC1
Gilligan, TD1
Rini, BI1
Garcia, JA2
Spetsieris, N1
Boukovala, M1
Weldon, JA1
Tsikkinis, A1
Hoang, A1
Aparicio, A1
Tu, SM1
Zurita, AJ1
Corn, PG2
Pagliaro, L1
Wang, J2
Subudhi, SK1
Tannir, NM1
Troncoso, P1
Wang, X2
Wen, S1
Fang, WY1
Wang, PF1
Fan, YC1
Shih, HJ1
Madan, RA3
Karzai, FH2
Al Harthy, M1
Kim, JW2
Arlen, PM2
Rosner, I2
Theoret, MR2
Cordes, L2
Bilusic, M1
Peer, CJ2
Dawson, NA3
Couvillon, A2
Hankin, A1
Williams, M1
Chun, G2
Owens, H1
Marte, JL1
Lee, MJ2
Tomita, Y2
Yuno, A1
Trepel, JB2
Lee, S2
Steinberg, SM3
Gulley, JL3
Dahut, WL4
Haas, NB1
LaRiviere, MJ1
Buckingham, TH1
Cherkas, Y1
Calara-Nielsen, K1
Foulk, B1
Patel, J2
Gross, S1
Smirnov, D1
Vaughn, DJ1
Amaravadi, R1
Wellen, KE1
Savitch, SL1
Majmundar, KJ1
Black, TA1
Yee, SS1
He, M1
Min, EJ1
Long, Q1
Jones, JO1
Pal, SK1
Carpenter, EL1
Wang, KY1
Ma, L1
Zhang, LL1
Hu, YC1
Jiang, JH1
Ma, Q1
Londhe, A5
Qi, K1
Cassinello, J1
Domínguez-Lubillo, T1
Gómez-Barrera, M1
Hernando, T1
Parra, R1
Asensio, I1
Casado, MA1
Moreno, P1
Nakai, Y1
Tanaka, N1
Ichikawa, K1
Miyake, M1
Anai, S1
Fujimoto, K1
Freedland, SJ1
Pilon, D2
Bhak, RH1
Narkhede, S1
Lefebvre, P3
Young-Xu, Y1
Boerrigter, E2
Benoist, GE2
van Oort, IM2
Verhaegh, GW1
van Hooij, O1
Groen, L1
Smit, F1
Oving, IM1
de Mol, P1
Smilde, TJ2
Somford, DM1
Schalken, JA1
van Erp, NP2
Parikh, M1
Liu, C1
Wu, CY1
Evans, CP1
Dall'Era, M1
Robles, D1
Lara, PN2
Gao, AC1
Pan, CX1
Vaishampayan, UN1
Patel, KR1
Albany, C2
Mehlhaff, BA2
Nordquist, LT3
Wagner, VJ1
Trandafir, L1
Graff, JN3
Lattouf, JB1
Espina, BM1
Zhu, E1
Yu, A1
Hazra, A1
De Meulder, M1
Mamidi, RNVS1
Bradic, B1
Hayreh, V1
Rezazadeh Kalebasty, A1
Nolsøe, AB1
Bratt, O1
Lumen, N2
Maroto, P1
Paiss, T1
Gomez-Veiga, F1
Kalinka, E1
Spaëth, D1
Matveev, V3
Wapenaar, R1
Costa, L1
Fu, S1
Bacon, JVW1
Sipola, J1
Iqbal, N1
Ferrario, C1
Ong, M1
Hotte, SJ3
Lo, G1
Tran, B1
Wood, LA1
Gingerich, JR2
North, SA1
Ruether, JD1
Sridhar, SS4
Kallio, HML1
Beja, K1
Schönlau, E1
Nykter, M1
Vandekerkhove, G1
Zhu, X2
Shi, Z1
Gao, S1
Wang, P1
Kang, C1
Zhao, F1
Hou, P1
Heath, EI1
Sartor, AO1
Sonpavde, GP1
Das, D1
Bitting, RL1
Berry, W1
Riggan, C1
Kephart, J1
Shobe, K1
Rasmussen, J1
Milowsky, MI2
Fleming, MT1
Bearden, J1
Goodman, M1
Zhang, T2
McNamara, M1
Zhang, D1
LaCroix, BL1
Kittles, RA1
Patierno, BM1
Sibley, AB2
Patierno, SR1
Owzar, K3
Hyslop, T1
Freedman, JA1
Maj-Hes, A1
Szarvas, T1
Sevcenco, S1
Conteduca, V1
Wetterskog, D1
Scarpi, E1
Romero-Laorden, N2
Gurioli, G1
Jayaram, A2
Lolli, C1
Schepisi, G2
Wingate, A1
Casadei, C1
Lozano, R2
Brighi, N1
Aragón, IM1
Marin-Aguilera, M1
Gonzalez-Billalabeitia, E1
Ratta, R1
Gafanov, R1
Facchini, G3
Chandana, SR1
Li, B2
Brown, LC1
Poole, EM1
Jimenez Romero, ME1
Gallego, MC1
Navarro Serrato, JC1
Sanchez Hurtado, MA1
Santotoribio, JD1
Montagnani, F1
Gonzalez-Velez, M1
Alimohamed, NS1
Rosellini, P1
Moreno-Candilejo, I1
Cigliola, A1
Rubio-Perez, J1
Crivelli, F1
Shaw, GK1
Bengala, C1
Francini, G1
Garcia-Foncillas, J1
Sweeney, CJ3
Harshman, LC1
Lee-Ying, R1
Heng, DYC1
Xiong, X1
Qiu, S1
Yi, X1
Xu, H1
Liao, D1
Lei, H1
Bai, S1
Peng, G1
Ai, J1
Yang, L2
Caffo, O3
Ortega, C1
Nolè, F2
Mucciarini, C1
Zagonel, V1
Veccia, A2
Palesandro, E1
Verri, E1
Buti, S1
Razzini, G1
Bozza, G1
Maruzzo, M1
Ciccarese, C1
Maines, F2
Kinspergher, S1
Ermacora, P1
Nicodemo, M1
Sartori, D1
Scapoli, D1
Sabbatini, R1
Lo Re, G1
Morelli, F1
Vittimberga, I1
Lippe, P1
Carrozza, F1
Valcamonico, F1
Porta, C1
Pappagallo, G1
Yang, Z1
Ni, Y2
Zhao, D1
Zhang, Y3
Jiang, L1
Chen, D1
Wu, Z1
Wang, Y6
He, L1
Shi, Y1
Zhou, F1
Mostaghel, EA1
Marck, BT1
Kolokythas, O1
Chew, F1
Schweizer, MT1
Cheng, HH1
Kantoff, PW4
Balk, SP1
Sharifi, N2
Matsumoto, AM1
Nelson, PS1
Montgomery, RB1
Overbeek, JK1
Donders, R1
Ter Heine, R1
Cicero, G4
DE Luca, R4
Dorangricchia, P1
Dieli, F3
Mulders, PFA2
Kheoh, T19
Todd, MB6
Reifsnider, O1
Hall, F1
Sorensen, S1
Proskorovsky, I2
Girod, I1
Lee, J1
Ramaekers, BLT2
Riemsma, R2
Tomini, F2
van Asselt, T2
Deshpande, S2
Duffy, S2
Armstrong, N2
Severens, JL2
Kleijnen, J2
Joore, MA2
van Dodewaard-de Jong, JM1
de Klerk, JMH1
Bloemendal, HJ1
Oprea-Lager, DE1
Hoekstra, OS1
van den Berg, HP1
Los, M2
Beeker, A1
Jonker, MA1
Verheul, HMW1
van den Eertwegh, AJM1
Kessler, ER2
Gao, D1
Breaker, K1
Wold, M1
Wacker, M1
Lam, ET1
Sonpavde, G10
Pond, GR7
Plets, M1
Hussain, MHA1
Garzotto, MG2
Mack, PC1
Twardowski, PW2
Van Veldhuizen, PJ1
Carducci, MA4
Monk, JP2
Zejnullahu, K1
Anantharaman, A1
Paz, R1
Premasekharan, G1
Huang, Y3
Aggarwal, RR2
Lin, AM2
Alumkal, JJ1
Alyamani, M1
Dittamore, R1
Struss, WJ1
Black, PC1
Scott, LJ1
Elliott, T2
Grande, E1
Melhem-Bertrandt, A1
Baron, B1
Hirmand, M1
Werbrouck, P2
Blasi, L1
Pepe, A1
Pavone, C1
Simonato, A1
Gschwend, JE3
Van Poppel, H4
Brookman-May, SD1
Malik, Z1
Blumenstein, B2
Stewart, PS1
Jacobs, CA1
Saito, K1
Jimenez, R1
Xie, F1
Yin, P1
Quevedo, F1
Costello, BA1
Pitot, HC1
Ho, T1
Ye, Z3
Eiken, P1
Barman, P1
McMenomy, BP1
Atwell, TD1
Ellingson, M1
Eckloff, BW1
Qin, R1
Ou, F1
Hart, SN1
Huang, H1
Jen, J1
Wieben, ED1
Climent, MÁ2
Pérez-Valderrama, B1
Fernández Parra, EM1
Fernández Calvo, O1
Ochoa de Olza, M2
Muinelo Romay, L1
Anido, U1
Domenech, M1
Hernando Polo, S1
Arranz Arija, JÁ1
Caballero, C1
Juan Fita, MJ1
Shin, MS1
Kang, Y1
Kang, I1
Stein, CA1
Levin, R1
Given, R1
Nemeth, P1
Bosch, B1
Chapas-Reed, J1
Dreicer, R4
Mariados, NF1
Steere, KJ1
Harrelson, SS1
Cella, D1
Traina, S1
Li, T3
Johnson, K1
Ho, KF1
Costa, RP1
Tripoli, V1
Murabito, A1
Hussain, M2
Daignault-Newton, S1
Stein, MN1
Kunju, LP1
Siddiqui, J1
Wu, YM1
Robinson, D1
Lonigro, RJ1
Cao, X1
Tomlins, SA1
Mehra, R1
Cooney, KA1
Montgomery, B3
Shevrin, DH1
Whang, YE1
Smith, DC1
Caram, MV1
Knudsen, KE1
Stadler, WM2
Feng, FY2
Chinnaiyan, AM1
Fan, L3
Wang, R2
Chi, C3
Cai, W1
Qian, H1
Shao, X1
Xu, F1
Pan, J3
Zhu, Y3
Shangguan, X2
Zhou, L2
Dong, B3
Xue, W3
Penson, DF1
Protheroe, A2
Rodríguez-Antolín, A1
Suttman, H1
Keam, B1
Damião, R1
McQuarrie, K1
Jia, B1
Martin, J1
Ghatalia, P1
Templeton, AJ6
Elkon, JM1
Millett, RL1
Millado, KF1
Lin, J3
Hamilou, Z1
Thakur, MK1
Heilbrun, L3
Dobson, K1
Boerner, J1
Stark, K2
Smith, D3
Heath, E4
Fontana, J2
Vaishampayan, U4
Poorthuis, MHF1
Vernooij, RWM1
van Moorselaar, RJA1
de Reijke, TM1
Ibraheem, A1
Kozloff, MF1
Carthon, B2
Harvey, RD1
Fishkin, P1
Yong, WP1
Chiong, E1
Nabhan, C1
Karrison, T1
Ratain, MJ3
Crawford, ED1
Underwood, W1
Francis, PSJ1
Hahn, AW2
Gill, DM2
Nussenzveig, RH2
Poole, A2
Farnham, J1
Cannon-Albright, L1
Marin, S1
Querol, R1
Campins, L1
Miarons, M1
Font, A1
Lianes, P1
Lei, BH1
Zou, Q2
Zhu, QY1
Lu, ZJ1
Mateo, J3
Dolling, D1
Bianchini, D2
Seed, G2
Flohr, P2
Crespo, M2
Figueiredo, I2
Miranda, S2
Terstappen, LWMM1
Winquist, E3
Song, P1
Huang, C1
Bejrananda, T1
Pripatnanont, C1
Tanthanuch, M1
Karnjanawanichkul, W1
West, J1
Ma, Y1
Newton, PK1
Fenioux, C1
Louvet, C1
Charton, E1
Rozet, F1
Ropert, S1
Prapotnich, D1
Barret, E1
Sanchez-Salas, R1
Mombet, A1
Cathala, N1
Joulia, ML1
Molitor, JL1
Henriques, J1
Bonnetain, F1
Cathelineau, X1
Bennamoun, M1
López-Campos, F1
Saez, MI1
Montesa, A1
Gutierrez-Pecharoman, A1
Villatoro, R1
Herrera, B1
Correa, R1
Rosero, A1
Pacheco, MI1
Garcés, T1
Cendón, Y1
Nombela, MP1
Van de Poll, F1
Grau, G1
Rivera, L1
López, PP1
Cruz, JJ1
Emamekhoo, H1
Barata, PC1
Edwin, NC1
Woo, KM1
Grivas, P1
Abdel-Rahman, O1
Teo, MY1
Bonetta, A1
Conca, R1
Rodriquenz, MG1
Dearden, L1
Shalet, N1
Artenie, C1
Mills, A1
Jackson, C1
Grant, L1
Gater, A1
Gong, Y2
Sha, J1
Grochtdreis, T1
König, HH1
Dobruschkin, A1
von Amsberg, G1
Dams, J1
Franco-Villalobos, C1
Sorensen, SV1
Sulur, G1
Basch, EM1
Scholz, M1
Vogelzang, N1
de Souza, P5
Marx, G1
George, S1
Schwarz, JK1
Kalebasty, AR1
Hutson, TE2
Dueck, AC1
Bennett, AV1
Dayan, E1
Mangeshkar, M1
Holland, J1
Weitzman, AL1
Hakenberg, OW1
Perez-Gracia, JL1
Demkow, T1
Ali, T1
Heidenreich, A3
Schultze-Seemann, W1
Sautois, B1
Pavlik, I1
Qin, A1
Novosiadly, RD1
Shahir, A1
Ilaria, R1
Nippgen, J1
Wilson, S1
Farnham, JM1
Stephenson, RA1
Cannon-Albright, LA1
Maughan, BL1
Ivanov, N1
Yang, Y2
Ma, X1
Zheng, H1
Boegemann, M2
Khaksar, S1
Bera, G1
Dopchie, C1
Everaert, E2
Hatzinger, M1
Hercher, D1
Matus, G1
Alvarez, LG1
Antoni, L1
Robinson, P1
Seyednasrollah, F1
Koestler, DC1
Wang, T2
Piccolo, SR1
Vega, R1
Greiner, R1
Fuchs, C1
Gofer, E1
Kumar, L1
Wolfinger, RD1
Kanigel Winner, K1
Bare, C1
Neto, EC2
Yu, T2
Shen, L3
Abdallah, K3
Norman, T2
Stolovitzky, G2
Soule, HR1
Elo, LL1
Zhou, FL2
Guinney, J2
Costello, JC2
Yildirim, BA1
Onal, C1
Kose, F2
Oymak, E1
Sedef, AM1
Besen, AA1
Aksoy, S1
Guler, OC1
Sumbul, AT2
Muallaoglu, S2
Mertsoylu, H2
Ozyigit, G1
Dalla Volta, A1
Formenti, AM1
Berruti, A2
Smith, M2
Parker, C2
Zucca, LE1
Karyakin, O1
Nahas, WC1
Zhang, A1
Teufel, M1
Shen, J1
Wagner, V1
Higano, C2
Duarte, C1
Jimeno, A1
Rosenthal, SA1
Hu, C1
Gomella, LG2
Amin, MB1
Purdy, J1
Michalski, JM1
Pervez, N1
Balogh, AG1
Rodrigues, GB1
Souhami, L1
Reaume, MN1
Williams, SG1
Hannan, R1
Horwitz, EM1
Raben, A1
Peters, CA1
Shipley, WU1
Sandler, HM1
van Nuland, M1
Venekamp, N1
Wouters, WME1
van Rossum, HH1
Rosing, H1
Beijnen, JH1
Hansen, AR1
Templeton, A1
Chen, E1
Evans, A1
Knox, J1
Prawira, A1
Tan, S1
Vera-Badillo, F2
Wouters, BG1
Cursano, MC1
Iuliani, M1
Paganelli, G1
Hindié, E1
Morgat, C1
Teply, BA2
Qiu, F1
Denmeade, SR2
Dubinsky, S1
Thawer, A1
McLeod, AG1
McFarlane, TRJ1
Arasaratnam, M1
Crumbaker, M1
Bhatnagar, A1
McKay, MJ1
Molloy, MP1
Werutsky, G1
Maluf, FC1
Cronemberger, EH1
Carrera Souza, V1
Dos Santos Martins, SP1
Peixoto, F1
Smaletz, O1
Schutz, F1
Herchenhorn, D1
Santos, T1
Mavignier Carcano, F1
Queiroz Muniz, D1
Nunes Filho, PRS1
Zaffaroni, F1
Barrios, C1
Fay, A1
Mannuel, H1
Liu, G3
Lara, P1
Flaig, T1
Zurita, A1
Mack, P1
Stella, P1
Bolton, S1
Al-Janadi, A1
Silbiger, D1
Usman, M1
Ivy, SP1
Zhao, J1
Zhang, M1
Liu, J2
Liu, Z1
Shen, P1
Nie, L1
Guo, W1
Cai, D1
Armstrong, CM1
Sun, G1
Chen, J1
Zhu, S1
Dai, J1
Zhang, H1
Zhao, P1
Zhang, X2
Yin, X1
Chen, N1
van der Poel, H1
Puente, J1
González-Del-Alba, A1
Méndez-Vidal, MJ1
Pinto, A1
Rodríguez, Á1
Cuevas Sanz, JM1
Muñoz Del Toro, JR1
Useros Rodríguez, E1
García García-Porrero, Á1
Vázquez, S1
Chau, CH1
Gao, R1
Sissung, TM1
Spencer, S1
Beatson, M1
Aragon-Ching, J1
Linton, A1
Pond, G1
Clarke, S1
Vardy, J1
Galsky, M1
Gerritse, FL1
Meulenbeld, HJ1
Roodhart, JM1
van der Velden, AM1
Blaisse, RJ1
Erjavec, Z1
Batty, N1
Yarlagadda, N1
Pili, R1
Palermo, A1
Chierichetti, F1
Galligioni, E1
Du, J1
Yang, Q1
Chen, XS1
Tian, J1
Yao, X2
Grassi, P1
Testa, I1
Verzoni, E1
Torri, V1
Salvioni, R1
Valdagni, R1
de Braud, F1
Basch, E3
Autio, K1
Mulders, P1
Mainwaring, PN1
Hao, Y1
Griffin, T1
Meyers, ML1
Cleeland, C1
Mulders, PF7
Marberger, M1
Haqq, CM2
Vera-Badillo, FE2
Attalla, M1
De Gouveia, P1
Leibowitz-Amit, R2
Knox, JJ2
Moore, M1
Amir, E2
Lin, CY1
Kaplan, EB1
Petrylak, D1
Phillips, R1
Kluetz, PG1
Ning, YM2
Maher, VE1
Tang, S1
Ghosh, D1
Aziz, R1
Palmby, T1
Pfuma, E1
Zirkelbach, JF1
Mehrotra, N1
Tilley, A1
Sridhara, R1
Ibrahim, A1
Justice, R1
Pazdur, R1
Delva, R1
Sevin, E1
Bompas, E1
Vedrine, L1
Ravaud, A1
Tubiana-Mathieu, N1
Linassier, C1
Houede, N4
Ringensen, F1
Cojocarasu, O1
Valenza, B1
Leconte, A1
Lheureux, S1
Clarisse, B1
Somer, BG1
Chłosta, PL1
Cervera Grau, JM1
Reuter, C1
Kamradt, J1
Pikiel, J1
Durán, I1
Wedel, S1
Callies, S1
André, V1
Hurt, K1
Brown, J1
Lahn, M1
Heinrich, B1
Hoy, SM1
Galsky, MD4
Leopold, L2
Wood, BA2
Wang, SL2
Paolini, J2
Chen, I2
Chow-Maneval, E2
Mooney, DJ1
Lechuga, M2
Michaelson, MD2
Fiaschi, AI2
Francini, F1
Bianco, V1
Perrella, A1
Paganini, G1
Laera, L3
Omlin, A2
Pezaro, C2
Atenafu, EG1
Keizman, D1
Seah, JA1
Mason, M1
Ozen, H1
Sengelov, L1
Van Oort, I1
Papandreou, C1
Fossa, S1
Hitier, S1
Morgan, CJ1
Oh, WK4
Naik, G1
Sezer, A1
Abalı, H1
Gültepe, I1
Özyılkan, Ö1
Zhou, ZR1
Liu, SX1
Zhang, TS1
Xia, J1
Peng, W2
Welkowsky, E1
Chandler, DW1
Mainwaring, P3
Hainsworth, JD3
North, S3
Fradet, Y2
Griffin, TW9
Park, YC3
Lafeuille, MH1
Grittner, AM1
Ellis, L1
McKenzie, RS1
Slaton, T1
Kozma, C1
Al-Asaaed, S1
Hoffman-Censits, J1
Clarke, SJ1
Vardy, JL1
Shiota, M1
Yokomizo, A1
Takeuchi, A1
Kiyoshima, K1
Inokuchi, J1
Tatsugami, K1
Naito, S1
Bellmunt, J7
Ma, H1
Zhu, G1
Wan, B1
Wu, PJ1
Wang, JY1
Geynisman, DM1
Plimack, ER1
Singal, R1
Ramachandran, K1
Gordian, E1
Quintero, C1
Zhao, W1
Reis, IM1
Rossi, G1
Loblaw, DA1
Oliver, TK1
Carducci, M1
Chen, RC1
Frame, JN1
Garrels, K1
Hotte, S1
Kattan, MW1
Raghavan, D1
Walker-Dilks, C1
Williams, J1
Bennett, CL1
Wootton, T1
Rumble, RB1
Dusetzina, SB2
Virgo, KS1
Ferraldeschi, R1
Perez, R1
Altavilla, A1
Zafeirou, Z1
Tunariu, N1
Dearnaley, D1
Auchus, RJ2
Nguyen, S2
Patel, JN1
Jiang, C2
Hertz, DL2
Mulkey, FA1
Friedman, PN2
Mahoney, JF2
Kelley, MJ2
McLeod, HL2
van Soest, RJ2
Mercier, F1
Barroso-Sousa, R1
da Fonseca, LG1
Souza, KT1
Chaves, AC1
Kann, AG1
de Castro, G1
Dzik, C1
Gandhi, JG1
Clark, WR1
Agus, DB1
Moran, S1
Kong, N1
Suri, A1
Bargfrede, M1
Weinberg, VK1
Alumkal, J1
Herrera, I1
Mukherjee, SD2
Schrijvers, D3
van den Eertwegh, AJ1
Li, W1
Ricci, DS1
Zelinsky, K1
Madan, R1
Naini, V2
Cruz, FM1
Fountzilas, G1
Ulys, A1
Carcano, F1
Agus, D1
Lee, SY1
Webb, IJ2
Tejura, B1
Borgstein, N1
Larson, SM1
Matheny, SL1
Burzykowski, T1
Zhou, T1
Zeng, SX1
Ye, DW3
Wei, Q1
Huang, YR1
Ye, ZQ2
Zhang, W1
Zhou, FJ1
Jie, J1
Chen, SP1
Xie, LP1
Na, YQ1
Sun, YH1
Jinga, V1
Hart, LL1
Wirth, M1
Suzuki, K1
MacLean, DB1
Akaza, H1
Nelson, J1
Dhawan, MS1
Oldan, J1
Chin, B1
Porsch, M1
Ulrich, M1
Wendler, JJ1
Liehr, UB1
Reiher, F1
Janitzky, A1
Baumunk, D1
Schindele, D1
Seseke, F1
Lux, A1
Schostak, M1
Boccardo, F1
Budnik, N2
Wiechno, PJ3
Doner, K3
Burke, JM3
de Olza, MO1
Choudhury, A2
Kopyltsov, E2
Van As, N2
Barton, D3
Fandi, A3
Jungnelius, U3
Ndibe, C1
Wang, CG1
Diamond, E1
Garcias, Mdel C1
Karir, B1
Tagawa, ST2
Dizdar, O1
Green, AK1
Corty, RW1
Wood, WA1
Meeneghan, M1
Reeder-Hayes, KE1
Liaw, BC1
Lance, RS1
Gardner, TA1
Karsh, LI1
McCoy, C1
DeVries, T1
Sheikh, NA1
GuhaThakurta, D1
Chang, N1
Redfern, CH1
Miano, ST1
De Rubertis, G1
Griffin, TA1
Beuzeboc, P1
Podrazil, M1
Horvath, R1
Becht, E1
Rozkova, D1
Bilkova, P1
Sochorova, K1
Hromadkova, H1
Kayserova, J1
Vavrova, K1
Lastovicka, J1
Vrabcova, P1
Kubackova, K1
Gasova, Z1
Jarolim, L1
Babjuk, M1
Fucikova, J1
Armstrong, A1
Ferrari, A1
Hainsworth, J1
Joshi, A1
Hozak, RR1
Schwartz, JD1
Spratlin, J1
Kollmannsberger, C1
Pankras, C1
Gonzalez, M1
Bernard, A1
Stieltjes, H1
Peng, L1
Jiao, J1
Acharya, M1
Tran, NP1
Yang, KW1
Yu, W1
Song, Y2
Huang, LH1
Han, WK1
He, ZS1
Jin, J2
Zhou, LQ1
Shevrin, D1
Stein, M1
Land, S1
Dickow, B1
Chang, K1
Kong, YY1
Dai, B2
Qu, YY1
Jia, ZW1
Li, GX1
Schallier, D2
Rappe, B1
Carprieaux, M1
Vandenbroucke, F1
Davis, ID1
Moore, DC1
Moore, A1
Heng, DY1
Mahammedi, H1
Planchat, E1
Pouget, M1
Durando, X1
Curé, H1
Guy, L1
Van-Praagh, I1
Savareux, L1
Atger, M1
Bayet-Robert, M1
Gadea, E1
Abrial, C1
Thivat, E1
Chollet, P1
Adesunloye, BA1
Huang, X1
Harold, N1
Sissung, T1
Beedie, SL1
McLeod, DG1
Chen, C1
Meisel, A1
von Felten, S1
Vogt, DR1
Liewen, H1
Stenner-Liewen, F1
Bruce, J1
Lim, EA1
Maul, S1
Smit, JW1
Gonzalez, MD1
Nanus, DM1
Luber, B1
Sun, Z1
Li, C1
Du, C1
Chen, Z1
Shan, Y1
Xie, L1
Lin, G1
Feng, Y1
Liu, W1
Ye, D1
Pelhivanov, N1
Charnas, R1
Queener, M1
Ellis, LA1
Lessans, S1
Wing, C1
Furukawa, Y1
Wheeler, HE1
Lassiter, C1
Weisman, L1
Watson, D1
Krens, SD1
Mulkey, F1
Renn, CL1
Febbo, PG1
Shterev, I1
Kroetz, DL1
Nakamura, Y1
Kubo, M1
Dorsey, SG1
Dolan, ME1
Bottini, A1
Generali, D2
Fleisher, M1
Danila, DC1
Baeten, K1
McCormack, R1
Terstappen, LW1
Xu, XS1
Stuyckens, K1
Vermeulen, A1
Poggesi, I1
Nandy, P1
Sternberg, C1
Le Moulec, S1
Krainer, M1
Bergman, A1
Hoelzer, W1
Cruciani, G1
Lam, E1
Polikoff, J1
Ramies, D1
Hessel, C1
Weitzman, A1
Binder, M1
Zhang, BY1
Kohli, T1
Lee, A1
Crane, E1
Liu, K1
Waldman, MF1
Gandhi, A1
de Morrée, ES1
Li, JS1
Massoudi, M1
Balk, M1
Yang, H2
Bui, CN1
Pandya, BJ1
Guo, J1
Wu, EQ1
Brown, B1
Barlev, A1
Flanders, S1
Kwon, ED1
Wolff, JM1
Tsao, CK1
Sfakianos, J1
Liaw, B1
Gimpel-Tetra, K1
Kemeny, M1
Bulone, L1
Shahin, M1
Maity, SN1
Titus, MA1
Gyftaki, R1
Wu, G1
Lu, JF1
Ramachandran, S1
Li-Ning-Tapia, EM1
Laajala, TD1
Winner, KK1
Bare, JC1
Khan, SA1
Peddinti, G1
Airola, A1
Pahikkala, T1
Mirtti, T1
Bot, BM1
Friend, S1
Soule, H1
Xie, Y1
Aittokallio, T1
Wilkerson, J1
Hugh-Jones, C1
Curt, G1
Rothenberg, M1
Simantov, R1
Murphy, M1
Morrell, J1
Beetsch, J1
Sargent, DJ1
Lebowitz, P1
Simon, R1
Stein, WD1
Bates, SE1
Fojo, T1
Gill, D1
Gaston, D1
Bailey, E1
Hahn, A1
Gupta, S1
Batten, J1
Alex, A1
Boucher, K1
Stenehjem, D1
Pei, XQ1
He, DL1
Tian, G1
Lv, W1
Jiang, YM1
Wu, DP1
Fan, JH1
Wu, KJ1
Patel, SA1
Sama, AR1
Hoffman-Censits, JH1
Kennedy, B1
Kilpatrick, D1
Mu, Z1
Leiby, B1
Lewis, N1
Cristofanilli, M1
Van Praet, C1
Rottey, S1
Van Hende, F1
Pelgrims, G1
Demey, W1
Van Aelst, F1
Wynendaele, W1
Gil, T1
Schatteman, P1
Filleul, B1
Machiels, JP1
D'Hondt, L1
Vermeij, J1
Mebis, J1
Clausse, M1
Rasschaert, M1
Van Erps, J1
Verheezen, J1
Van Haverbeke, J1
Goeminne, JC1
Reeves, J1
Bergman, AM1
Zalewski, P1
Jacobs, C1
Gleave, M1
Shen, YJ1
Bian, XJ1
Xie, HY1
Zhang, HL1
Zhang, SL1
Yao, XD1
Gil-Bazo, I1
Arévalo, E1
Castillo, A1
Zudaire, ME1
Carranza, OE1
Fusco, JP1
Castañón, E1
Collado-Gómez, V1
López, I1
Gil-Aldea, I1

Clinical Trials (49)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-controlled Double-blind Study of JNJ-56021927 in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone Versus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Subjects With Chemotherapy-naive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cance[NCT02257736]Phase 3982 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Multicentric, Randomized, Phase II Study Evaluating the Combination of METFORMIN With TAXOTERE®+Metformine Placebo Versus TAXOTERE®+Metformin for the Treatment of Metastatic Hormone-refractory Prostate Cancer.[NCT01796028]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
DescriPtive Analysis of Real-world Clinical Outcomes of Second Line (2L) Novel Anti-HormonE Therapy (NAH) or RadIum-223 (Xofigo) in Patients With Metastatic Castration Resistance Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) After First Line (1L) NAH Therapy[NCT03896984]346 participants (Actual)Observational2019-03-18Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Comparative Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Low-Dose Prednisone Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Versus ADT Alone in Newly Diagnosed Subjects With High-Risk, Metastatic Hormone-naive Prostate Cancer (mHNPC)[NCT01715285]Phase 31,209 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-12Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Phase III Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of DCVAC/PCa Versus Placebo in Men With Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Eligible for 1st Line Chemotherapy[NCT02111577]Phase 31,182 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-26Completed
Phase Ib/II Trial of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Combination Therapies in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) (KEYNOTE-365)[NCT02861573]Phase 1/Phase 21,200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-17Recruiting
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentre Phase II Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Olaparib Versus Placebo When Given in Addition to Abiraterone Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate [NCT01972217]Phase 2158 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-01Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized Open-label Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Olaparib Versus Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide in Participants With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Are Unselected for Homologous Recombination Repair [NCT03834519]Phase 3793 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-02Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Single Agent Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Evidence of Antitumor Activity of CPO-100 in Adult Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors[NCT04931823]Phase 1126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-24Recruiting
A Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study of Cabazitaxel Versus an Androgen Receptor (AR)-Targeted Agent (Abiraterone or Enzalutamide) in mCRPC Patients Previously Treated With Docetaxel and Who Rapidly Failed a Prior AR-targeted Agent (CARD)[NCT02485691]Phase 4255 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-09Completed
Prospective Multi-country Observational Study to Investigate the Impact of Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide on Health-related Quality of Life, Patient-reported Outcomes, and Medical Resource Use in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patie[NCT02813408]226 participants (Actual)Observational2016-05-03Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Sequencing Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer[NCT02125357]Phase 2202 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Biomarker Directed Therapy Versus Clinician's Choice of Enzalutamide or Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Post Abiraterone[NCT04015622]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-07Recruiting
A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Radium-223 Dichloride in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone/Prednisolone in the Treatment of Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Chemotherapy-naïve Subjects With Bone Predom[NCT02043678]Phase 3806 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-30Active, not recruiting
Predictive fActors for toleraNce to Taxane Based CHemotherapy In Older adultS Affected by mEtastatic Prostate Cancer, a Prospective Observational Study (ANCHISES)[NCT05471427]118 participants (Actual)Observational2020-01-01Completed
A Randomized Open-label Phase IIa Study Evaluating Quantified Bone Scan Response Following Treatment With Radium-223 Dichloride Alone or in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide in Subjects With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have[NCT02034552]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-07Completed
A Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of Niraparib Plus Androgen Receptor-Targeted Therapy (Apalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone) in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer[NCT02924766]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-03Completed
APalutamide and stEReotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low Burden Metastatic Hormone senSItive Prostate Cancer, a rANdomized Trial - PERSIAN[NCT05717660]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-11Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Registry of Patients With a Confirmed Diagnosis of Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate Presenting With Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer[NCT02236637]3,050 participants (Actual)Observational2013-06-14Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Multi-center Study of Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Poor Prognosis-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer[NCT02254785]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-10-31Active, not recruiting
Biomarkers Study: Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC), Free DNA, Stem Cells and Epithelial-mesenchymal-transition (EMT) Related Antigens as Biomarkers of Activity of Cabazitaxel in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC): a Proof of Concept.[NCT03381326]104 participants (Actual)Observational2014-12-15Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Docetaxel Plus Prednisone Versus Placebo Plus Docetaxel Plus Prednisone in Participants With Chemotherapy-naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Have Prog[NCT03834506]Phase 31,030 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-02Completed
CHemotherapy Plus Enzalutamide In First Line Therapy for Castration Resistant prOstate caNcer[NCT02453009]Phase 2232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-10-31Recruiting
Phase I Non-Randomized, Unblinded, Single-Center Trial of Oral Telmisartan Alone or Combined With Selected Standard of Care Therapies for Prostate Cancer[NCT06168487]Early Phase 142 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Study of Increased-Dose Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC)[NCT01637402]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-13Completed
A Multi-center, Single Arm Study of Enzalutamide in Patients With Progressive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Abiraterone Acetate[NCT02116582]Phase 4215 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-23Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Abiraterone Acetate (CB7630) Plus Prednisone in Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer[NCT00887198]Phase 31,088 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-28Completed
A Randomized Phase 3 Study Comparing Cabazitaxel/Prednisone in Combination With Custirsen (OGX-011) to Cabazitaxel/Prednisone for Second-Line Chemotherapy in Men With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (AFFINITY)[NCT01578655]Phase 3630 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
A Randomized Gene Fusion Stratified Phase 2 Trial of Abiraterone With or Without ABT-888 for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer[NCT01576172]Phase 2159 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-30Completed
A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study Evaluating the Food Effect on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer[NCT01543776]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Phase II Randomized Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus ADT Versus APALUTAMIDE Versus Abiraterone and APALUTAMIDE in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer With Non-castrate Testosterone Levels[NCT02867020]Phase 2128 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-11Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Abiraterone Acetate (CB7630) Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy[NCT00638690]Phase 31,195 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Optimizing and Personalising Azacitidine Combination Therapy for Treating Solid Tumours Using the Quadratic Phenotypic Optimization Platform (QPOP) and an Artificial Intelligence-based Platform (CURATE.AI)[NCT05381038]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Azacitidine (Vidaza), Docetaxel and Prednisone for Patients With Hormone Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With a Taxotere Containing Regimen.[NCT00503984]Phase 1/Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated (stopped due to Withdrawal of Funding)
Phase 1b/2a Safety and Immunogenicity of the DNMT Inhibitor Azacitidine During Anti-Tuberculosis Therapy[NCT03941496]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-10-31Withdrawn (stopped due to The study was halted prematurely due to Bristol-Myers Squibb's (BMS) decision to withdraw support for this study.)
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Aflibercept Versus Placebo Administered Every 3 Weeks in Patients Treated With Docetaxel/ Prednisone for Metastatic Androgen-independent Prostate Cancer[NCT00519285]Phase 31,224 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Orteronel (TAK-700) Plus Prednisone With Placebo Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer That Has Progressed During or Following Docetaxel-based Ther[NCT01193257]Phase 31,099 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-15Completed
An Multicenter, Randomized Study of Comparison of Docetaxel Plus Prednisone With Mitoxantrone Plus Prednisone in the Patients With Hormone-refractory (Androgen-independent) Metastatic Prostate Cancer[NCT00436839]Phase 3228 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Orteronel Plus Prednisone With Placebo Plus Prednisone in Patients With Chemotherapy-Naive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer[NCT01193244]Phase 31,560 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-01Completed
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Docetaxel and Prednisone With or Without Lenalidomide in Subjects With Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC)[NCT00988208]Phase 31,059 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-11Completed
Bone Response After Luteinizing Hormone-releasing Hormone Analogue and Enzalutamide +/- Zoledronic Acid in Prostate Cancer Patients With Hormone Sensitive Metastatic Bone Disease: a Prospective, Phase II, Randomized, Multicenter Study[NCT03336983]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-01Recruiting
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized Study of IMC-A12 or IMC-1121B Plus Mitoxantrone and Prednisone in Metastatic Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer (AIPC) Following Disease Progression on Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy[NCT00683475]Phase 2138 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Carboplatin and Everolimus (RAD001) in Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) Pretreated With Docetaxel Chemotherapy.[NCT01051570]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of OGX-427 (a Second-Generation Antisense Oligonucleotide to Heat Shock Protein-27) in Patients With Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Not Previously Received Chemotherapy for Metastatic Disease[NCT01120470]Phase 274 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Multiparametric Assessment of Bone Response in mCRPC Patients Treated With Cabozantinib Upon Progression to Chemotherapy and Next Generation Hormonal Agents: a Phase II Study[NCT05265988]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-29Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study of Cabozantinib (XL184) Versus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Received Prior Docetaxel and Prior Abiraterone or MDV3100[NCT01605227]Phase 31,028 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Abiraterone Acetate in African American/Black Patients With Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer[NCT01735396]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Terminated (stopped due to poor accrual)
A Phase I/II Study of Alisertib in Combination With Abiraterone and Prednisone for Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer After Progression on Abiraterone[NCT01848067]Phase 1/Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-14Completed
A Randomized Phase 3 Study Comparing Standard First-Line Docetaxel/Prednisone to Docetaxel/Prednisone in Combination With Custirsen (OGX-011) in Men With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer[NCT01188187]Phase 31,022 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Overall Survival (OS)

The OS was defined as the time from randomization to date of death from any cause. (NCT02257736)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years and 10 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo+ Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone33.71
Apalutamide + Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone36.17

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

The rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the occurrence of one of the following: 1) a participant was considered to have progressed by bone scan if - a) the first bone scan with greater than or equal to (>=) 2 new lesions compared to baseline was observed in less than (<) 12 weeks from randomization and was confirmed by a second bone scan taken >=6 weeks later showing >=2 additional new lesions (a total of >=4 new lesions compared to baseline), b) the first bone scan with >=2 new lesions compared to baseline was observed in >=12 weeks from randomization and the new lesions were verified on the next bone scan >=6 weeks later (a total of >=2 new lesions compared to baseline); 2) progression of soft tissue lesions measured by computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1. (NCT02257736)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years and 4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo+ Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone16.59
Apalutamide + Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone23.98

Time to Chronic Opioid Use

Time to chronic opioid use was defined as the time from date of randomization to the first date of opioid use. (NCT02257736)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years and 10 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo+ Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone53.26
Apalutamide + Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone46.98

Time to Initiation of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

Time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy. (NCT02257736)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years and 10 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo+ Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone34.23
Apalutamide + Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone36.11

Time to Pain Progression

"Time to pain progression: time from randomization to first date that participant either experienced an increase by 2 points from baseline in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain intensity item (item 3) or Case Report Form (CRF) pain, observed at 2 consecutive evaluations >=4 wks apart, or initiation of chronic opioids as defined in time to chronic opioid use, whichever occurred first. BPI-SF is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess severity of pain and impact of pain on daily functions. Item 3(worst pain intensity) asks participants to rate worst pain in prior 7-days on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, where 0 indicates No pain and 10 indicates Pain as bad as you can imagine. A lower score is better.CRF pain refers to participant's response to global pain assessment How would you rate your pain over the past 7 days?with a scale of 0(No pain) to 10(Pain as bad as you can imagine),that is systematically reported and recorded on the eCRF." (NCT02257736)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years and 10 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo+ Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone26.51
Apalutamide + Abiraterone Acetate - Prednisolone21.82

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to date of death from any cause. (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 66 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADT53.32
Placebo + ADT36.53

Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Radiographic PFS was defined as the time (in months) interval from randomization to the first date of radiographic progression or death. Radiographic progression included progression by bone scan (according to modified Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 [PCWG2] criteria), defined as at least 2 new lesions on bone scan and progression of soft tissue lesions by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1 criteria). As per the RECIST 1.1 guideline, progression requires a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions and a minimum absolute increase of 5 millimeter (mm) in the sum as compared to nadir sum of diameter. (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 44 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADT33.02
Placebo + ADT14.78

Time to Initiation of Chemotherapy

Time to initiation of chemotherapy was defined as the time (in months) interval from the date of randomization to the date of initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer. (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 66 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADTNA
Placebo + ADT57.59

Time to Pain Progression

"Time to pain progression was defined as the time (in months) interval from randomization to the first date a participant experienced a greater than or equal to (>=) 30 percent (%) increase in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) from baseline in the BPI-SF worst pain intensity (Item 3) observed at 2 consecutive evaluations (>=4) weeks apart. BPI-SF was an 11-item questionnaire, designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Total score ranged from 0 to 10 with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing pain as bad as you can imagine." (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 66 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADT47.41
Placebo + ADT16.62

Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

Time to PSA progression was defined as the time (in months) interval from the date of randomization to the date of PSA progression, according to PCWG2 criteria. PCWG2 defines PSA progression as the date that a 25 percent (%) or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) or more from the nadir is documented, which is confirmed by a second value obtained 3 or more weeks later. (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 66 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADT33.31
Placebo + ADT7.43

Time to Skeletal-Related Event

Time to skeletal-related event was defined as the earliest of the following: clinical or pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, palliative radiation to bone, or surgery to bone. (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 66 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADTNA
Placebo + ADTNA

Time to Subsequent Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Time to subsequent therapy was defined as the time (in months) interval from the date of randomization to the date of initiation of subsequent therapy for prostate cancer. (NCT01715285)
Timeframe: Up to 66 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADT54.87
Placebo + ADT21.22

Overall Survival, Intention-to-treat Population

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause. (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause, up to 58 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy23.9
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy24.3

Overall Survival, Intention-to-treat Population, Abiraterone as Prior Therapy

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause. (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause, up to 58 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy16.6
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy21.0

Overall Survival, Intention-to-treat Population, Enzalutamide as Prior Therapy

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause. (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause, up to 58 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy15.2
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy21.4

Overall Survival, Intention-to-treat Population, no Prior Abiraterone or Enzalutamide

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause. (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause, up to 58 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy26.7
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy25.7

Overall Survival, Per Protocol Population

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause. (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause, up to 58 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy29.7
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy26.7

Proportion of Patients With Skeletal-related Events, Intention-to-treat Population

"Progressive disease on bone scans defined as a minimum of two new lesions. Visceral and nodal disease was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 with modifications as described in the Statistical Analysis Plan.~Skeletal-related events included:~Radiation therapy to bone~Pathologic bone fracture~Spinal cord compression~Surgery to bone~Change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain" (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: From randomization to the end of the study, up to 57 months

InterventionPatients (Number)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy43
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy26

Proportion of Patients With Skeletal-related Events, Per Protocol Population

"Progressive disease on bone scans defined as a minimum of two new lesions. Visceral and nodal disease was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 with modifications as described in the Statistical Analysis Plan.~Skeletal-related events included:~Radiation therapy to bone~Pathologic bone fracture~Spinal cord compression~Surgery to bone~Change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain" (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: From randomization to the end of the study, up to 57 months

InterventionPatients (Number)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy28
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy20

Radiological Progression-free Survival, Intention-to-treat Population

Progressive disease on bone scans was defined as a minimum of two new lesions. Visceral and nodal disease was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 with modifications as described in the Statistical Analysis Plan. (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the date of the earliest objective evidence of either radiographic progression of bone lesions, radiographic progression of soft tissue lesions, or death due to any cause, up to 58 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy11.1
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy11.1

Radiological Progression-free Survival, Per Protocol Population

Progressive disease on bone scans was defined as a minimum of two new lesions. Visceral and nodal disease was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 with modifications as described in the Statistical Analysis Plan. (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the date of the earliest objective evidence of either radiographic progression of bone lesions, radiographic progression of soft tissue lesions, or death due to any cause, up to 58 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy11.2
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy11.2

Time to First Skeletal-related Event, Intention-to-treat Population

"Skeletal-related events included:~Radiation therapy to bone~Pathologic bone fracture~Spinal cord compression~Surgery to bone~Change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain" (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the date of the first skeletal-related event, up to 58 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care ChemotherapyNA
Placebo With Standard of Care ChemotherapyNA

Time to First Skeletal-related Event, Per Protocol Population

"Skeletal-related events included:~Radiation therapy to bone~Pathologic bone fracture~Spinal cord compression~Surgery to bone~Change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain" (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the date of the first skeletal-related event, up to 58 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care ChemotherapyNA
Placebo With Standard of Care ChemotherapyNA

Time to PSA Progression, Intention-to-treat Population

The evidence of PSA progression is defined as: time from randomization to the date of PSA absolute increase ≥ 2 ng/mL and ≥ 25% above nadir or baseline values confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained at least 3 weeks later. (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the date of objective evidence of PSA progression (PSA absolute increase ≥ 2 ng/mL and ≥ 25% above nadir or baseline values providing confirmation by a second consecutive value obtained at least 3 weeks later), up to 39 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy10.5
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy10.6

Time to PSA Progression, Per Protocol Population

The evidence of PSA progression is defined as: time from randomization to the date of PSA absolute increase ≥ 2 ng/mL and ≥ 25% above nadir or baseline values confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained at least 3 weeks later. (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the date of objective evidence of PSA progression (PSA absolute increase ≥ 2 ng/mL and ≥ 25% above nadir or baseline values providing confirmation by a second consecutive value obtained at least 3 weeks later), up to 39 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy10.5
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy10.6

Time to Radiological Progression or Skeletal-related Event, Intention-to-treat Population

"Progressive disease on bone scans defined as a minimum of two new lesions. Visceral and nodal disease was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 with modifications as described in the Statistical Analysis Plan.~Skeletal-related events included:~Radiation therapy to bone~Pathologic bone fracture~Spinal cord compression~Surgery to bone~Change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain" (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the date of the first radiological progression or skeletal-related event, up to 58 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy11.1
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy10.9

Time to Radiological Progression or Skeletal-related Event, Per Protocol Population

"Progressive disease on bone scans defined as a minimum of two new lesions. Visceral and nodal disease was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 with modifications as described in the Statistical Analysis Plan.~Skeletal-related events included:~Radiation therapy to bone~Pathologic bone fracture~Spinal cord compression~Surgery to bone~Change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain" (NCT02111577)
Timeframe: Time from randomization to the date of the first radiological progression or skeletal-related event, up to 58 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
DCVAC/PCa With Standard of Care Chemotherapy11.1
Placebo With Standard of Care Chemotherapy11.1

Part A: Number of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

"DLTs were assessed by a Safety Review Committee (SRC) after a minimum of 3 patients had received at least 14 days of treatment in Part A.~A DLT was defined as any toxicity which was not a recognised AE of abiraterone or prednisolone, and was not attributable to the disease or disease-related processes under investigation, which occurred during a minimum period of 14 days treatment and which included: 1. haematological toxicity CTCAE v4.0 Grade 4 or higher present for more than 4 days (except anaemia); 2. non-haematological toxicity CTCAE v4.0 Grade 3 or higher including infection, corrected QT interval prolongation; 3. any other toxicity that was greater than that at baseline, was clinically significant and/or unacceptable, did not respond to supportive care, resulted in a disruption of dosing schedule of 7 days or more, or was judged to be a DLT by the SRC.~A DLT excluded alopecia and isolated laboratory changes of any grade without clinical sequelae or clinical significance." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: From Day 1 for Cohort 1 and from Day 4 for Cohort 2 up to 14 days treatment with olaparib + abiraterone for 3 patients.

InterventionPatients (Number)
Part A Cohort 1: Olaparib 200 mg + Abiraterone2
Part A Cohort 2: Olaparib 300 mg + Abiraterone4

Part B: Median Best Percentage Change From Baseline in Circulating Tumour Cell (CTC) Level

"The median best percentage change from baseline in CTC levels was determined to assess the anti-tumour activity of olaparib when given in combination with abiraterone, compared with placebo given in addition to abiraterone.~The best percentage change was defined as the biggest CTC level reduction compared with baseline or smallest increase in the absence of a decrease." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: From baseline, then every 4 weeks up to Week 24, and then every 12 weeks.

InterventionPercentage change in CTC level (Median)
Part B: Olaparib + Abiraterone-1.0
Part B: Placebo + Abiraterone-1.0

Part B: Median Best Percentage Change From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels

"The best percentage change from baseline in PSA levels was determined to assess the anti-tumour activity of olaparib when given in addition to abiraterone, compared with placebo given in addition to abiraterone.~The best percentage change was defined as the biggest reduction in PSA level compared with baseline or smallest increase in the absence of a decrease." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: From baseline, then every 4 weeks up to Week 52, and then every 12 weeks.

InterventionPercentage change in PSA level (Median)
Part B: Olaparib + Abiraterone-54.16
Part B: Placebo + Abiraterone-49.85

Part B: Median Overall Survival (OS)

"OS was determined to assess the efficacy of olaparib when given in addition to abiraterone, compared with placebo given in addition to abiraterone.~OS was performed at the time of the analysis of rPFS, and the median OS, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique, is presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: From baseline, every 12 weeks up to Week 72, then every 24 weeks up to 24 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Part B: Olaparib + Abiraterone22.7
Part B: Placebo + Abiraterone20.9

Part B: Median Radiological Progression-Free Survival (rPFS) Time

"The efficacy of olaparib when given in combination with abiraterone was assessed by rPFS, defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1 (for soft tissue disease) and Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG-2) (for bone disease) criteria, or death.~Progression using RECIST 1.1 criteria was defined as at least 20% increase from baseline in the sum of diameters of target lesions, progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of at least 1 new lesion.~Progression using PCWG-2 criteria was determined if 2 or more new metastatic bone lesions were observed (with a total of at least 4 new lesions since baseline assessment if observed at the 12 week scan, or persistence of or increase in number of lesions if observed after the 12 week scan as determined by a confirmatory scan at least 6 weeks later or at next scheduled visit)." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: From baseline, every 12 weeks up to Week 72, then every 24 weeks up to 24 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Part B: Olaparib + Abiraterone13.8
Part B: Placebo + Abiraterone8.2

Part B: Median Time to Second Progression or Death (PFS2)

The efficacy of olaparib when given in combination with abiraterone was assessed by PFS2, defined by local standard clinical practice and included objective radiological progression by RECIST 1.1 (soft tissue), symptomatic progression, rise in PSA level or death in the absence of overall progression. (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: From randomisation until analysis cut-off date (up to approximately 3 years).

InterventionMonths (Median)
Part B: Olaparib + Abiraterone23.3
Part B: Placebo + Abiraterone18.5

Part B: Percentage of Patients With at Least One Objective Response (Objective Response Rate [ORR])

"The overall radiological ORR was calculated to assess the anti-tumour activity of olaparib in combination with abiraterone, compared with placebo in combination with abiraterone.~The best overall ORR was defined as the percentage of patients with at least 1 visit response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) in soft tissue disease assessed by RECIST 1.1 and also bone scan status of non-progressive disease or non-evaluable for their bone scans assessed by PCWG-2.~CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Reduction of pathological lymph nodes to <10 millimetres.~PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline.~The percentage of patients with a response is presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: From baseline, then every 4 weeks up to Week 52, and then every 12 weeks.

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Part B: Olaparib + Abiraterone27.3
Part B: Placebo + Abiraterone31.6

Part B: Percentage of Patients With Progression Events or Death (rPFS)

"The efficacy of olaparib when given in combination with abiraterone was assessed by rPFS, defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression using RECIST version 1.1 (for soft tissue disease) and PCWG-2 (for bone disease) criteria, or death.~Progression using RECIST 1.1 criteria was defined as at least 20% increase from baseline in the sum of diameters of target lesions, progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of at least 1 new lesion.~Progression using PCWG-2 criteria was determined if 2 or more new metastatic bone lesions were observed (with a total of at least 4 new lesions since baseline assessment if observed at the 12 week scan, or persistence of or increase in number of lesions if observed after the 12 week scan as determined by a confirmatory scan at least 6 weeks later or at next scheduled visit).~The percentage of patients with progression events is presented overall and according to RECIST 1.1 and/or PCWG-2 criteria, or death." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: From baseline, every 12 weeks up to Week 72, then every 24 weeks up to 24 months.

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Part B: Olaparib + Abiraterone64.8
Part B: Placebo + Abiraterone76.1

Median Time to First Subsequent Therapy (TFST) and Median Time to Second Subsequent Therapy (TSST)

"The TFST and TSST were determined to assess the anti-tumour activity of olaparib when given in combination with abiraterone, compared with placebo given in addition to abiraterone.~TFST was defined as the time from randomisation to the earlier of first subsequent anti-cancer therapy start date following study treatment discontinuation, or death.~TSST was defined as the time from randomisation to the earlier of the second subsequent anti-cancer therapy start date following study treatment discontinuation, or death." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: From randomisation until analysis cut-off date (up to approximately 3 years).

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
TFSTTSST
Part B: Olaparib + Abiraterone13.519.6
Part B: Placebo + Abiraterone9.718.0

Part A Pharmacokinetics (PK): Olaparib Maximum Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cmax,ss)

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of olaparib 300 mg bid, the Cohort 2 olaparib Cmax,ss is presented for olaparib monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

Interventionmicrograms per millilitre (mcg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Olaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 2: Abiraterone, Olaparib + Abiraterone7.724

Part A Pharmacokinetics (PK): Olaparib Maximum Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cmax,ss)

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of olaparib 300 mg bid, the Cohort 2 olaparib Cmax,ss is presented for olaparib monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

Interventionmicrograms per millilitre (mcg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Olaparib aloneOlaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 1: Olaparib, Olaparib + Abiraterone7.7816.504

Part A PK Analysis: Olaparib Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve at Steady State (AUCss)

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of olaparib 300 mg bid, the Cohort 2 olaparib AUCss is presented for olaparib monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

Interventionmcg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Olaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 2: Abiraterone, Olaparib + Abiraterone49.51

Part A PK Analysis: Olaparib Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve at Steady State (AUCss)

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of olaparib 300 mg bid, the Cohort 2 olaparib AUCss is presented for olaparib monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

Interventionmcg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Olaparib aloneOlaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 1: Olaparib, Olaparib + Abiraterone45.2740.83

Part A PK Analysis: Olaparib Minimum Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cmin,ss)

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of olaparib 300 mg bid, the Cohort 2 olaparib Cmin,ss is presented for olaparib monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

Interventionmcg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Olaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 2: Abiraterone, Olaparib + Abiraterone1.279

Part A PK Analysis: Olaparib Minimum Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cmin,ss)

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of olaparib 300 mg bid, the Cohort 2 olaparib Cmin,ss is presented for olaparib monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

Interventionmcg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Olaparib aloneOlaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 1: Olaparib, Olaparib + Abiraterone1.2640.9170

Part A PK Analysis: Olaparib Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Tmax,ss)

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of olaparib 300 mg bid, the Cohort 2 olaparib tmax,ss is presented for olaparib monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

InterventionHours (h) (Median)
Olaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 2: Abiraterone, Olaparib + Abiraterone2.000

Part A PK Analysis: Olaparib Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Tmax,ss)

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of olaparib 300 mg bid, the Cohort 2 olaparib tmax,ss is presented for olaparib monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

InterventionHours (h) (Median)
Olaparib aloneOlaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 1: Olaparib, Olaparib + Abiraterone2.0002.080

Part A PK: Abiraterone AUCss

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, the Cohort 2 abiraterone AUCss is presented for abiraterone monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Olaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 1: Olaparib, Olaparib + Abiraterone718.9

Part A PK: Abiraterone AUCss

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, the Cohort 2 abiraterone AUCss is presented for abiraterone monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Abiraterone aloneOlaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 2: Abiraterone, Olaparib + Abiraterone825.5524.6

Part A PK: Abiraterone Cmax,ss

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, the Cohort 2 abiraterone Cmax,ss is presented for abiraterone monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

Interventionnanograms per millilitre (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Olaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 1: Olaparib, Olaparib + Abiraterone130.7

Part A PK: Abiraterone Cmax,ss

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, the Cohort 2 abiraterone Cmax,ss is presented for abiraterone monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

Interventionnanograms per millilitre (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Abiraterone aloneOlaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 2: Abiraterone, Olaparib + Abiraterone145.886.12

Part A PK: Abiraterone Cmin,ss

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, the Cohort 2 abiraterone Cmin,ss is presented for abiraterone monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Olaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 1: Olaparib, Olaparib + Abiraterone7.983

Part A PK: Abiraterone Cmin,ss

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, the Cohort 2 abiraterone Cmin,ss is presented for abiraterone monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Abiraterone aloneOlaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 2: Abiraterone, Olaparib + Abiraterone8.3766.358

Part A PK: Abiraterone Tmax,ss

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, the Cohort 2 abiraterone tmax,ss is presented for abiraterone monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

InterventionHours (Median)
Olaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 1: Olaparib, Olaparib + Abiraterone3.000

Part A PK: Abiraterone Tmax,ss

"Following multiple dosing to steady state of abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, the Cohort 2 abiraterone tmax,ss is presented for abiraterone monotherapy and for olaparib given in combination with abiraterone.~Only patients with data available for analysis at each time point are presented." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 1 was between Days 3 and 7 for olaparib, and Days 4 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone. PK sampling for Cohort 2 Group 2 was between Days 5 and 7 for abiraterone, and Days 6 and 8 for olaparib and abiraterone.

InterventionHours (Median)
Abiraterone aloneOlaparib + abiraterone
Part A Cohort 2 Group 2: Abiraterone, Olaparib + Abiraterone2.5252.500

Part A: Percentage of Patients Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)

"The safety and tolerability of olaparib in combination with abiraterone was assessed during Part A of the study. The percentage of patients experiencing AEs, including information on seriousness, severity, study treatment relationship and those leading to discontinuation for all doses of olaparib and for abiraterone are presented.~Severity of AEs was assessed using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events (CTCAE) v4.0. AEs were assigned to a Grade from 1 through 5 as follows:~Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening requiring hospitalisation; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; Grade 5: Death related to AE.~'c-r' = causally related 'discont' = discontinuation." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: Cohort 1 and 2: From baseline in Part A (Day 1 for each cohort) up to 30 days following last dose of study treatment.

,
InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Any AE c-r to olaparib + abirateroneAny AE c-r to olaparib onlyAny AE c-r to abiraterone onlyAny AE CTCAE Grade 3 or higherAny AE CTCAE Grade 3 or higher c-r to olaparibAny AE CTCAE Grade 3 or higher c-r to abirateroneAny AE with outcome = deathAny serious AE (SAE)Any SAE c-r to olaparibAny SAE c-r to abirateroneAny AE causing discont of olaparibAny AE causing discont of olaparib c-r to olaparibAny AE causing discont olaparib c-r to abiraterone
Part A Cohort 1: Olaparib 200 mg + Abiraterone66.733.3066.700066.700000
Part A Cohort 2: Olaparib 300 mg + Abiraterone46.27.715.423.17.77.7023.1007.700

Part B: Percentage of Patients Experiencing AEs

"The safety and tolerability of olaparib when given in combination with abiraterone was assessed during Part B of the study. The percentage of patients experiencing AEs, including information on seriousness, severity, study treatment relationship and those leading to discontinuation for all doses of olaparib and for abiraterone are presented.~Severity of AEs was assessed using the NCI Common Terminology CTCAE v4.0. AEs were assigned to a Grade from 1 through 5 as follows:~Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening requiring hospitalisation; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; Grade 5: Death related to AE.~'c-r' = causally related. 'discont' = discontinuation. 'ola/pla' = olaparib/placebo." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment following randomisation in Part B up to 30 days following last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 3 years).

,
InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Any AE c-r to ola/pla + abirateroneAny AE c-r to ola/pla onlyAny AE c-r to abiraterone onlyAny AE CTCAE Grade 3 or higherAny AE CTCAE Grade 3 or higher c-r to ola/plaAny AE CTCAE Grade 3 or higher c-r to abirateroneAny AE with outcome = deathAny AE with outcome = death c-r to ola/plaAny AE with outcome = death c-r to abirateroneAny SAEAny SAE c-r to ola/plaAny SAE c-r to abirateroneAny AE causing discont of ola/plaAny AE causing discont of treatment c-r to ola/plaAny AE causing discont treatment c-r abiraterone
Part B: Olaparib + Abiraterone45.118.31.453.523.916.95.61.4035.29.95.629.616.98.5
Part B: Placebo + Abiraterone12.79.97.028.25.61.41.40019.71.409.95.61.4

Part B: Percentage of Patients With PSA Responses

"The percentages of patients with single visit responses and with confirmed responses are presented to assess the anti-tumour activity of olaparib when given in addition to abiraterone, compared with placebo given in addition to abiraterone.~A single visit response was defined as any post-dose visit PSA level reduced by 50% or more compared with baseline.~A confirmed response was defined as a reduction in PSA level of 50% or more on 2 consecutive occasions at least 4 weeks apart compared with baseline.~Patients may have had more than 1 single visit response or confirmed response but were counted once." (NCT01972217)
Timeframe: From baseline, then every 4 weeks up to Week 24, and then every 12 weeks.

,
InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Single visit responseConfirmed response
Part B: Olaparib + Abiraterone50.747.9
Part B: Placebo + Abiraterone47.942.3

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. The nonparametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival curves. (NCT03834519)
Timeframe: Up to ~31 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab + Olaparib15.8
Next-generation Hormonal Agent Monotherapy (NHA)14.6

Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS)

rPFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per PCWG-modified RECIST 1.1 based on BICR or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per PCWG-modified RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions or ≥2 new bone lesions was also considered PD. PCWG-modified RECIST is similar to RECIST 1.1 with the exception that a confirmation assessment of PD (>4 weeks after the initial PD) is required for participants who remain on treatment following a documented PD per RECIST 1.1 and PCWG rules include new bone lesions. The rPFS per PCWG-modified RECIST as assessed by BICR for all participants is presented. The nonparametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival curves. (NCT03834519)
Timeframe: Up to ~31 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab + Olaparib4.4
Next-generation Hormonal Agent Monotherapy (NHA)4.2

Duration of Tumor Response

Duration of tumor response was defined as the time (in months) from date of first response (CR or PR) until date of first documentation of tumor progression or death, whichever occurs first. As per RECIST 1.1 CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From the date of the first response to the date of first documented tumor progression, or death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cabazitaxel6.5
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide8.0

Number of Symptomatic Skeletal Events (SSE)

SSE was defined as occurrence of a new symptomatic pathological fracture, use of external beam radiation to relieve bone pain, occurrence of spinal cord compression or tumor- related orthopedic surgical intervention. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: Baseline until occurrence of first SSE or data cut-off, whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionevents (Number)
Cabazitaxel24
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide35

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time interval (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date participant was known to be alive, or at the cut-off date whichever comes first. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause, or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cabazitaxel13.6
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide11.0

Percentage of Participants Achieving Pain Response Assessed Using Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Pain Intensity Score

Pain response as per BPI-SF was defined as a decrease of at least 30% from Baseline in the average of BPI-SF pain intensity score observed at 2 consecutive evaluations >=3 weeks apart without increase in analgesic usage score (calculated from analgesic use data, with non-narcotic medications assigned value of 1 point and narcotic medications assigned 4 points). The BPI-SF is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain on a 0-10 categorical scale where 0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicated worst outcomes. Percentage of Participants Achieving Pain Response assessed using BPI-SF Pain Intensity Score were reported. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: Baseline until pain progression, first further anticancer therapy, or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cabazitaxel45.9
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide19.3

Percentage of Participants With Overall Objective Tumor Response

Overall objective tumor response was defined as having a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to the RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cabazitaxel36.5
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide11.5

Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response

PSA response was defined as >= 50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks later. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: Baseline up to PSA response, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cabazitaxel36.3
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide14.3

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS:time duration (in months) from date of randomization to date of first occurrence of any of following events: radiological tumor progression (RECIST 1.1); progression of bone lesions (PCWG2); symptomatic progression (developing urinary or bowel symptoms; need to change anti-cancer therapy), pain progression or death due to any cause. Tumor Progression(RECIST 1.1): at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Progression of bone lesion (PCWG2 criteria): first bone scan with >=2 new lesions compared to Baseline and confirmed by second bone scan performed >=6 weeks later; pain progression: increase by >=30% from Baseline in pain intensity score (calculated using scale ranged from 0=no pain to 5=extreme pain) or increase in analgesic usage score >=30% (calculated from analgesic use data, non-narcotic medications assigned value of 1 point and narcotic medications assigned 4 points). Analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From randomization until tumor progression or bone lesion progression, pain progression, death due to any cause, or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cabazitaxel4.4
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide2.7

Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS)

Radiographic progression-free survival: time (in months) from randomization to occurrence of any one of following: radiological tumor progressions using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1), progression of bone lesions using Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria or occurrence of death due to any cause. Progression as per RECIST 1.1: at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Progression of bone lesions (PCWG2 criteria): first bone scan with >= 2 new lesions compared to Baseline observed less than (<) 12 weeks from randomization and confirmed by a second bone scan performed >=6 weeks; first bone scan with >=2 new lesions compared to Baseline observed >=12 weeks from randomization. In accordance with protocol, data cut-off date for final analysis of this endpoint was the date when 196 rPFS events had occurred. Analysis done by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From randomization until tumor progression or bone lesion progression, death due to any cause, or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cabazitaxel8.0
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide3.7

Time to Pain Progression

Time to pain progression was defined as the time duration (in months) between the date of randomization and the date of first documented pain progression. Pain progression, in participants with no pain or stable pain at Baseline was defined as increase of >=30% from baseline in the BPI-SF pain intensity score observed at 2 consecutive evaluations >=3 weeks apart without decrease in analgesic usage score or increase in analgesic usage score (calculated from analgesic use data, with non-narcotic medications assigned value of 1 point and narcotic medications assigned 4 points) >=30%. The BPI-SF is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain on a 0-10 categorical scale where 0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicated worst outcomes. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: Baseline until pain progression or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
CabazitaxelNA
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide8.5

Time to PSA Progression (TTPP)

TTPP was defined as the time duration (in months) between the date of randomization and the date of first documented PSA progression. PSA progression (as per PCWG 2) was defined as: 1) If decline from Baseline value: an increase of >=25% (at least 2 ng/mL) over the nadir value, confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks apart; 2) If no decline from Baseline value: an increase of >=25% (at least 2 ng/mL) over the baseline value after 12 weeks of treatment, confirmed by a second PSA value at least 3 weeks apart. Analysis performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From time from randomization until PSA progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cabazitaxel6.3
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide2.1

Time to Symptomatic Skeletal Event

Time to SSE was defined as the time duration (in months) between the date of randomization and the date of occurrence of the first SSE. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first SSE, or data cut-off whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
CabazitaxelNA
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide16.7

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Single Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and End of Treatment

EQ-5D was a standardized HRQOL questionnaire consisting of EQ-5D descriptive system and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression measured on 3 levels (no problem, some problems & severe problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. 5 dimensional 3-level system was converted into single index utility score. Possible values for single index utility score ranged from -0.594 (severe problems in all dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in all dimensions) on scale where 1 represented best possible health state. EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS scale ranging from 0-100, where 0=worst imaginable health state and 100=best imaginable health state, where higher states indicated better outcomes. Baseline corresponded to last evaluable assessment before treatment administration. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, Cycle 5, Cycle 6, Cycle 7, Cycle 8 and at End of Treatment (any time up to: 141 weeks)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2: VASCycle 3: VASCycle 4: VASCycle 5: VASCycle 6: VASCycle 7: VASCycle 8: VASEnd of treatment: VASCycle 2: Utility Index ScoreCycle 3: Utility Index ScoreCycle 4: Utility Index ScoreCycle 5: Utility Index ScoreCycle 6: Utility Index ScoreCycle 7: Utility Index ScoreCycle 8: Utility Index ScoreEnd of treatment: Utility Index Score
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide0.91.5-1.13.2-1.5-0.21.2-5.9-0.010-0.011-0.002-0.035-0.0000.024-0.014-0.079
Cabazitaxel3.64.54.60.6-1.32.92.8-3.30.0260.0410.0510.0270.0150.0290.008-0.048

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score at Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and End of Treatment

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) evaluation was performed using the FACT-P questionnaire (Version 4). FACT-P was a 39-item participant rated questionnaire that measures the concerns of participants with prostate cancer. It consisted of 5 sub-scales assessing physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and prostate-specific concerns (12 items). FACT-P total score was the sum of all 5 subscale scores. It ranged from 0 to156 with higher score indicated better quality of life with fewer symptoms. Baseline corresponded to last evaluable assessment before treatment administration. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of each Cycle 2, Cycle 3, Cycle 4, Cycle 5, Cycle 6, Cycle 7, Cycle 8 and at End of Treatment (any time up to 141 weeks)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8End of treatment
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide-0.0-1.0-0.7-1.00.42.70.8-7.5
Cabazitaxel2.62.72.82.1-3.7-2.2-4.8-6.3

Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS) in Participants With Presence and Absence of Biomarker

Circulating tumor cell (CTC) counts were considered as biomarker in a liquid biopsy. rPFS in participants with presence and absence of subtypes of CTC biomarker i.e. chromosomal instability (CIN) and neuroendocrine (NE) was reported in this outcome measure. rPFS was defined as: time (in months) from randomization to the first occurrence of any one of following: radiological tumor progressions (RECIST1.1), progression of bone lesions (PCWG2 criteria) or death due to any cause. Progression (RECIST1.1): at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Progression of bone lesions (PCWG2 criteria): first bone scan with >= 2 new lesions compared to Baseline observed <12 weeks from randomization and confirmed by a second bone scan performed >=6 weeks later; first bone scan with >=2 new lesions compared to Baseline observed >=12 weeks from randomization and new lesions were verified on next bone scan >= 6 weeks later. (NCT02485691)
Timeframe: From randomization until tumor progression or bone lesion progression, death due to any cause, or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: up to 141 weeks)

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Presence of CINAbsence of CINPresence of NEAbsence of NE
Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide4.23.43.93.5
Cabazitaxel4.28.53.08.2

Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Additional Primary Malignancies

Treatment-emergent additional primary malignancies were adverse events identified as additional primary malignancies that occurred after start of study treatment until the end of the treatment period. (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 4 weeks after last study treatment, up to 65 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred26
Placebo + Abi/Pred25

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Bone Fractures

Treatment-emergent fractures were adverse events identified as fractures that occurred after start of study treatment until the end of the treatment period. All bone fractures and bone-associated events (e.g., osteoporosis) were reported as either AEs, or SAEs if the criteria of SAE were met, regardless of the investigator's causality assessment. (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 4 weeks after last study treatment, up to 65 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred107
Placebo + Abi/Pred49

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time (months) from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Subjects alive at the survival cut-off date were censored at the last date known to be alive. (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: From randomization until death from any cause, up to 67 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred30.1
Placebo + Abi/Pred34.8

Radiological Progression Free Survival (rPFS)

rPFS was defined as the time (months) from the date of randomization to the date of confirmed radiological progression or death (if death occurred before progression) based on independent assessment. (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: From randomization until the date of confirmed radiological progression or death, up to 47 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred11.2
Placebo + Abi/Pred12.4

Symptomatic Skeletal Event Free Survival (SSE-FS)

SSE-FS was defined as time (months) from randomization to the earliest of onset date of skeletal symptoms treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), onset date of pathological bone fracture, onset date of spinal cord compression, procedure date of tumor-related orthopedic surgery, or death from any cause. Subjects who died without prior SSE and ≥ 13 weeks after the last SSE assessment are censored at the last SSE assessment date. Subjects alive at the survival cut-off date are censored at the last date known to be alive. Subjects with multiple events are only counted for the category in which the first event occurred. If multiple SSE (component events) occur on the same date for 1 subject, the subject is only counted into 1 category in the order of: spinal cord compression > bone fracture > orthopedic surgery > EBRT. (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: From randomization until first onset of on-study symptomatic skeletal event (SSE) or death, up to 47 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred22.3
Placebo + Abi/Pred26.0

Time to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

Time to cytotoxic chemotherapy is time (months) from randomization to the earliest date of the first cytotoxic chemotherapy. Participants who have not started cytotoxic chemotherapy during the study were censored at the last assessment date. (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: From randomization until the date of first cytotoxic chemotherapy, up to 47 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred29.5
Placebo + Abi/Pred28.5

Time to Opiate Use for Cancer Pain

Time to opiate use for cancer pain was defined as the interval from the date of randomization to the date of opiate use. (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: From randomization until the date of opiate use, up to 47 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred19.0
Placebo + Abi/Pred22.6

Time to Pain Progression

Time to pain progression was defined as the interval from randomization to the first date a subject experienced pain progression, assessed by BPI-SF (see Baseline Characteristics) and defined as: an increase of 2 or more points in the average worst pain score (WPS) from baseline observed at 2 consecutive evaluations >= 4 weeks apart or initiation of short- or long-acting opioid use for pain for subjects with WPS 0 at baseline; an increase of 2 or more points in the average WPS from baseline observed at 2 consecutive evaluations ≥ 4 weeks apart and an average WPS of ≥ 4 OR initiation of short- or long-acting opioid use for pain for subjects with WPS 1 to 3 at baseline. Subjects without pain progression at the end of study are censored at the last date known to have not progressed: the last evaluation date for pain scores or last visit when recorded opiate use, whichever is last. Subjects with no on-study assessment or no baseline assessment are censored at the date of randomization. (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: From randomization until the date of pain progression based on pain score, up to 47 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred14.4
Placebo + Abi/Pred18.7

Number of Participants With Any Study Drug-related Post-treatment Adverse Events Per Maximum Intensity

"An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence (i.e., any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a participant in the study. Any bleeding event occurring during the study was not documented as an AE because this event was planned to be captured in the assessment of efficacy. AEs that started after the treatment period were defined as post-treatment AEs. Drug-related AEs were those with reasonable causal relationship to the study treatment decided by the investigators." (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: After the treatment period, up to 46 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
Placebo + Abi/Pred3330
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred3951

Number of Participants With Post-treatment Adverse Events

"An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence (i.e., any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a participant in the study. Any bleeding event occurring during the study was not documented as an AE because this event was planned to be captured in the assessment of efficacy. AEs that started after the treatment period were defined as post-treatment AEs. Drug-related AEs were those with reasonable causal relationship to the study treatment decided by the investigators." (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: After the treatment period, up to 46 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any eventsAny drug-related eventsAny chemotherapy-related eventsAny additional primary malignancies
Placebo + Abi/Pred1339347
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred13818316

Number of Participants With Post-treatment Bone Fractures

Post-treatment fractures were adverse events identified as fractures that occured after the end of the treatment period until participant died, was lost to follow-up, withdrew informed consent, actively objected to collection of further data, or was transitioned to the extended safety follow-up study. All bone fractures and bone-associated events (e.g., osteoporosis), were reported as either AEs, or SAEs if the criteria of SAE were met, regardless of the investigator's causality assessment. (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: After the treatment period, up to 46 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lumbar vertebral fractureRib fractureSpinal compression fractureThoracic vertebral fractureTraumatic fractureOsteoporotic fracturePathological fracture
Placebo + Abi/Pred11112013
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred00006612

Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy-related Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders

Post-treatment blood and lymphatic system disorders were adverse events identified as blood and lymphatic system disorders that occurred after the end of the treatment period until participant died, was lost to follow-up, withdrew informed consent, actively objected to collection of further data, or was transitioned to the extended safety follow-up study. (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: After the treatment period, up to 46 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AnaemiaBone marrow failureFebrile neutropeniaLeukopeniaNeutropeniaPancytopeniaThrombocytopenia
Placebo + Abi/Pred4080312
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred5151802

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

"An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence (i.e., any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a participant in the study. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose was resulting in death, was lifethreatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity. AEs or SAEs occurring after start of study treatment until the end of the treatment period were defined as treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) or serious TEAEs. Drug-related TEAEs or serious TEAEs were those with reasonable causal relationship to the study treatment decided by the investigators." (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until the end of the treatment period, up to 65 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEAny drug-related TEAERadium-223/Placebo-related TEAEAny serious TEAEAny drug-related serious TEAERadium-223/Placebo-related serious TEAE
Placebo + Abi/Pred38727192172297
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred382265921753211

Number of Subjects With Radium-223/Placebo-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Per Maximum Intensity

"An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence (i.e., any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a participant in the study. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose was resulting in death, was lifethreatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity. AEs or SAEs occurring after start of study treatment until the end of the treatment period were defined as treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) or serious TEAEs. Radium-223/placebo-related TEAEs or serious TEAEs were those with reasonable causal relationship to radium-223 or placebo decided by the investigators." (NCT02043678)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until the end of the treatment period, up to 65 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAE - Grade 1TEAE - Grade 2TEAE - Grade 3TEAE - Grade 4Serious TEAE - Grade 2Serious TEAE - Grade 3Serious TEAE - Grade 4
Placebo + Abi/Pred5324132052
Radium-223 Dichloride + Abi/Pred4428191380

Bone Scan Lesion Area

Bone scan lesion area was defined as the sum of the pixel areas (cm2) of the set of the whole body technetium-99 bone scan imaging pixels identified as bone lesion. (NCT02034552)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks

Interventioncm^2 (Mean)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)30227.13
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & Prednision10185.58
Radium-223 With Enzalutamide17321.45

Overall Survival

(NCT02034552)
Timeframe: From the randomization date to the date of death due to any cause (about 42.94 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)35.81
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & Prednision37.55
Radium-223 With Enzalutamide29.86

Radiological Progression Free Survival

(NCT02034552)
Timeframe: From randomization to radiological disease progression or death from any cause (about 30.82 months )

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)4.40
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & PrednisionNA
Radium-223 With EnzalutamideNA

Symptomatic Skeletal Event-free Survival

(NCT02034552)
Timeframe: From the randomization date to the first SSE on or following the randomization date or death, whichever occurred first (about 32.39 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)11.93
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & PrednisionNA
Radium-223 With Enzalutamide19.91

Time to First Symptomatic Skeletal Event

(NCT02034552)
Timeframe: From the randomization date to the first SSE on or following the randomization date (about 30.82 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)NA
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & PrednisionNA
Radium-223 With EnzalutamideNA

Time to Radiological Bone Progression

(NCT02034552)
Timeframe: From the randomization date to the date of radiological bone progression (about 30.82 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)11.5
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & PrednisionNA
Radium-223 With EnzalutamideNA

Time to Radiological Progression

(NCT02034552)
Timeframe: From the randomization date to the date of radiological disease progression (about 30.82months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)4.40
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & PrednisionNA
Radium-223 With EnzalutamideNA

Patient Bone Scan Response Rate

Radiological bone scan response based on change from baseline of digitized technetium-99 bone scans using computer-aided detection software. Responder (R): 30% or greater resolution of the BSLA compared to baseline. Stable Disease (SD): Not meeting the criteria for R, PD, or UE. Progressive Disease (PD): Two or more new areas of radiotracer uptake attributable to metastatic disease in regions of bone that had not previously shown radiotracer uptake or greater than 30% increase from baseline in BSLA attributable to metastatic disease. Unable to Evaluate (UE): Assigned if bone scan results cannot be interpreted due to inconsistent image acquisition parameters compared to the reference scan, incomplete imaging, or other similar technical deficiencies. (NCT02034552)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks

,,
InterventionPercentage (Number)
Responder (R)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Missing
Radium-223 Dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)22.2027.850.0
Radium-223 With Abiraterone & Prednision57.921.15.315.8
Radium-223 With Enzalutamide50.018.812.518.8

"Time to Pain Progression (TTPP) as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Item 3 (Worst Pain in 24 Hours) and Opiate Analgesic Use Assessed by the Analgesic Quantification Algorithm [AQA] Score"

"TTPP was defined as the time from randomization to pain progression as determined by Item 3 of the BPI-SF and by the AQA score. Pain progression was defined as:~For participants asymptomatic at baseline: a ≥2-point change from baseline in the average (4-7 days) BPI-SF item 3 score at 2 consecutive visits OR initiation of opioid use for pain~For participants symptomatic at baseline (average BPI-SF Item 3 score >0 and/or currently taking opioids:, a ≥2-point change from baseline in the average BPI-SF Item 3 score and an average worst pain score ≥4 and no decrease in average opioid use (≥1-point decrease in AQA score from a starting value of 2 or higher) OR any increase in opioid use at 2 consecutive follow-up visits.~TTPP was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Participants who had > 2 consecutive visits that were not evaluable for pain progression were censored at the last evaluable assessment." (NCT03834506)
Timeframe: Up to 36.5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab + Docetaxel21.1
Placebo + DocetaxelNA

Duration of Response (DOR) Per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review

DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per PCWG and RECIST 1.1 criteria until progressive disease (PD) or death. PD per RECIST 1.1 was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. PD per PCWG was the appearance of ≥2 new bone lesions on bone scan, that have been confirmed to not represent tumor flare, and were persistent for ≥6 weeks. The DOR was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. If a participant had not progressed, the participant was censored at the date of last disease assessment. (NCT03834506)
Timeframe: Up to 36.5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab + Docetaxel6.3
Placebo + Docetaxel6.2

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due To an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented. (NCT03834506)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 27 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pembrolizumab + Docetaxel150
Placebo + Docetaxel115

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The number of participants who experienced an AE is presented. (NCT03834506)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 30 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pembrolizumab + Docetaxel508
Placebo + Docetaxel505

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions per RECIST 1.1; and no evidence of disease (NED) on bone scan per PCWG) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions per RECIST 1.1; and non-progressive disease, non-evaluable [NE], or NED on bone scan or CR with non-progressive disease or NE bone scan per PCWG). (NCT03834506)
Timeframe: Up to 36.5 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pembrolizumab + Docetaxel33.5
Placebo + Docetaxel35.3

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. The OS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Participants without documented death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. (NCT03834506)
Timeframe: Up to 36.5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab + Docetaxel19.6
Placebo + Docetaxel19.0

Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate

The Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) response rate was the percentage of participants who had PSA response defined as a reduction in the PSA level from baseline by ≥50%. The reduction in PSA level was confirmed by an additional PSA evaluation performed ≥3 weeks from the original response. The analysis was performed on participants who had baseline PSA measurements. (NCT03834506)
Timeframe: Up to 36.5 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pembrolizumab + Docetaxel44.5
Placebo + Docetaxel45.7

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) Per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)

rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to occurrence of: radiological tumor progression using RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR; progression of bone lesions using PCWG criteria; or death due to any cause. Progression as per RECIST 1.1 was ≥20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions and progression of existing non-target lesions. Progression of bone lesions by PCWG criteria was the appearance of ≥2 new bone lesions on bone scan, that have been confirmed to not represent tumor flare, and was persistent for ≥6 weeks. The rPFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Participants without a rPFS event were censored at the date of last disease assessment. (NCT03834506)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 28 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab + Docetaxel8.6
Placebo + Docetaxel8.3

Time to First Symptomatic Skeletal-related Event (SSRE)

"SSRE was the time from randomization to the first symptomatic skeletal-related event defined as:~Use of external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to prevent or relieve skeletal symptoms~Occurrence of new symptomatic pathologic bone fracture (vertebral or non-vertebral)~Occurrence of spinal cord compression~Tumor-related orthopedic surgical intervention, whichever occurs first.~The SSRE was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Participants without symptomatic skeletal-related events were censored at the last evaluable assessment." (NCT03834506)
Timeframe: Up to 36.5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab + DocetaxelNA
Placebo + DocetaxelNA

Time to Initiation of the First Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapy (TFST)

TFST was defined as the time from randomization to initiation of the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy or death; whichever occurred first. The TFST was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Any participant not known to have further subsequent therapy or death was censored at the last known time that no subsequent new anti-cancer therapy was received. (NCT03834506)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 28 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab + Docetaxel10.7
Placebo + Docetaxel10.4

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

"The time to PSA progression was the time from randomization to PSA progression. The PSA progression date was defined as the date of:~≥25% increase and ≥2 ng/mL above the nadir, confirmed by a second value ≥3 weeks later if there was PSA decline from baseline; OR~≥25% increase and ≥2 ng/mL increase from baseline beyond 12 weeks if there was no PSA decline from baseline~Time to PSA progression was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Participants without PSA progression were censored at the last evaluable assessment." (NCT03834506)
Timeframe: Up to 36.5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab + Docetaxel6.9
Placebo + Docetaxel7.0

Time to Radiographic Soft Tissue Progression Per Soft Tissue Rules of Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)

The time to radiographic soft tissue progression was defined as the time from randomization to radiographic soft tissue progression per soft tissue rules of PCWG-modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR. Progression was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Time to radiographic soft tissue progression was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Participants without radiographic soft tissue progression were censored at the last evaluable assessment. (NCT03834506)
Timeframe: Up to 36.5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab + Docetaxel12.4
Placebo + Docetaxel11.2

Comparison of Circulating Androstenedione Levels Between Primary-Resistant Patients and Responders

The distribution of the baseline androstenedione levels and the change in hormone level at 12 weeks will be compared between patients experiencing a PSA decline >30% (responders) and patients without such a PSA decline (primary-resistant) using a two group t statistic. Measurements will be obtained at an earlier time point if the patient comes off study for disease progression before week 12. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Androstenedione in Primary Resistant (STD)NA
Androstenedione in Responders (STD)NA

Comparison of Circulating DHEA-S Levels Between Primary-Resistant Patients and Responders

The distribution of the baseline DHEA-S levels and the change in hormone level at 12 weeks will be compared between patients experiencing a PSA decline >30% (responders) and patients without such a PSA decline (primary-resistant) using a two group t statistic. Measurements will be obtained at an earlier time point if the patient comes off study for disease progression before week 12. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmicrogram per deciliter (µg/dL) (Mean)
DHEA-S in Primary Resistant (STD)NA
DHEA-S in Responders (STD)NA

Comparison of Circulating Testosterone Levels Between Primary-Resistant Patients and Responders

The distribution of the baseline testosterone levels and the change in hormone level at 12 weeks will be compared between patients experiencing a PSA decline >30% (responders) and patients without such a PSA decline (primary-resistant) using a two group t statistic. Measurements will be obtained at an earlier time point if the patient comes off study for disease progression before week 12. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionNanograms per decilitre (ng/dL) (Mean)
Testosterone in Primary Resistant (STD)NA
Testosterone in Responders (STD)NA

Correlation of Circulating Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) Levels From Baseline to Week 12

"Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) will be calculated to summarize the relationship between DHEA values at baseline and at 12 weeks. DHEA labs will be obtained at an earlier time point if the patient comes off study for disease progression before week 12. Coefficients are on a continuous scale ranging from -1 to +1 with a value of -1 indicating a perfect negative linear association of DHEA levels between the 2 time points, a value of 0 indicating no association between DHEA levels between the two time points, and a value of +1 indicating a positive linear association of DHEA levels between the two time points." (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (r) (Number)
Standard Dose0

Number of Patients With PSA Response From Dose Escalation

A PSA response for the dose escalation group is defined as a participant with a documented PSA decline after 12 weeks of therapy with standard-dose, then had disease progression, and then achieved a ≥30% PSA decline after 12 weeks from the start of dose escalation therapy. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks from start of dose escalation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Escalation0

Serum Concentration Levels of Abiraterone Acetate Over Time

Pharmacokinetic assessment at the initiation of standard dose therapy, at the time of initial disease progression, at the time of a response to increased dose of abiraterone acetate and at the time of disease progression on increased-dose therapy. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionnanograms per millilitre (ng/mL) (Median)
Concentration at First Draw on Standard Dose Therapy (4 Weeks)5.5
Concentration at Time of Disease Progression on Standard Dose14.2
Concentration at Time of Disease Progression on Increased Dose31.5

Time to PSA Progression for Dose Escalation Cohort

Time to PSA progression as defined by RECIST criteria or by the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG) criteria for patients whom were treated with increased dose Abiraterone Acetate. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dose Escalation12

Comparison of Circulating DHEA Levels Between Primary-Resistant and Responders

The distribution of the baseline DHEA levels and the change in hormone level at 12 weeks will be compared between patients experiencing a PSA decline >30% (responders) and patients without such a PSA decline (primary-resistant) using a two group t statistic. Measurements will be obtained at an earlier time point if the patient comes off study for disease progression before week 12. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Initial drawProgression / Week 12
DHEA in Primary Resistant (STD)56.228.5
DHEA in Responders (STD)79.413.5

Number of Participants With Worst-grade, Treatment-related Toxicities for Dose Escalation Group

Frequency of any treatment-related toxicity with increased-dose Abiraterone Acetate by maximum observed grade will be tabulated for the study cohort. Toxicities will be graded for management according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 as a measure of patient safety. (NCT01637402)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dry MouthHypertensionAlanine aminotransferase increaseIrritabilityAspartate aminotransferase increasedHypokalemiaPurpuraFatigue
Dose Escalation (CTCAE Grade 1)10000010
Dose Escalation (CTCAE Grade 2)01011101
Dose Escalation (CTCAE Grade 3)00100000
Dose Escalation (CTCAE Grade 4)00000000

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from first dose to death from any cause. All events of death were included. If patients discontinued study drug before the analysis data cut-off point, only OS status was assessed every 12 weeks until the data cut-off point date or until death, whichever occurred first. For patients who were alive at the time of the analysis data cut-off point, the OS time was censored on the last date the patient was known to be alive. Death from any cause was included, regardless of whether the event occurred while the patient was still taking study drug or after the patient discontinued study drug. OS median was estimated using the KM method. A 2-sided 95% CI was provided for this estimate using the BC method. (NCT02116582)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug administration up to the data cut-off date of 08 May 2016; up to 2 years.

InterventionMonths (Median)
EnzalutamideNA

Percentage of Participants With a Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response

PSA response was defined as at least a 50% decrease from baseline in PSA, and was a binary variable for achieving this criteria (or not) based on the lowest PSA value observed postbaseline. Participants with no postbaseline PSA value were regarded as non-responders. 95% CI for PSA response rate was computed using the Clopper-Pearson method based on the exact binomial distribution. (NCT02116582)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug administration up to the data cut-off date for end-of-study completion 29 Sep 2017; the median duration of treatment was 5.7 months.

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Enzalutamide22.0

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

Radiographic PFS, was defined as the time from first dose to the first objective evidence of radiographic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. For patients with no documented progression event, it was censored on the date of the last disease assessment performed prior to the analysis data cut-off point. Radiographic progression (RP) for soft tissue disease was defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) V1.1 criteria. RP for bone disease was determined according to the consensus guidelines of a modification of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2) guidelines. The 50th percentile of Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates was used as the estimate of the rPFS median. A 2-sided 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was provided for this estimate using the Brookmeyer & Crowley (BC) method. (NCT02116582)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug administration up to treatment discontinuation or the data cut-off date of 08 May 2016, whichever occurred first; the median duration of treatment was 5.7 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Enzalutamide8.1

Time to PSA Progression

The time to PSA progression was calculated as the time interval from the date of first dose to the date of first observation of PSA progression. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 μg/L (i.e., 2 ng/mL or more) above the nadir or above the baseline value for patients who did not have a decline in PSA postbaseline values, and which was confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained at least 3 or more weeks later (i.e., a confirmed rising trend) (PCWG2 criteria). The 50th percentile of KM estimates was used as the estimate of the time to PSA progression median. A 2-sided 95% CI was provided for this estimate using the BC method. (NCT02116582)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug administration up to the data cut-off date of 08 May 2016; the median duration of treatment was 5.7 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Enzalutamide5.7

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event occurring or worsening between the start of study treatment date and the latest date of 30 days after the last dose date or the 30-day follow-up visit date, and not later than the data cut-off date or the date of death. AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values, were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) guidelines (V4.03). (NCT02116582)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug administration up to data cut-off date for end-of-study completion (29 Sep 2017); the median duration of treatment was 5.7 months.

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any TEAENCI-CTCAE Grade ≥3Study Drug-RelatedStudy Drug-Related NCI-CTCAE Grade ≥3TEAEs with Death as an OutcomeSerious Adverse Event (SAE)Study Drug-related SAETEAEs Leading to Study Drug DiscontinuationStudy Drug-Related TEAEs Leading to Drug Disc.
Enzalutamide1999512718228287623

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to date of death from any cause. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From randomization (Day 1) up to end of study (Month 60)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)34.66
Placebo30.29

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

The rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the occurrence of one of the following: 1) a participant was considered to have progressed by bone scan if - a) the first bone scan with greater than or equal to (>=) 2 new lesions compared to baseline was observed in less than (<) 12 weeks from randomization and was confirmed by a second bone scan taken >=6 weeks later showing >=2 additional new lesions (a total of >=4 new lesions compared to baseline), b) the first bone scan with >=2 new lesions compared to baseline was observed in >=12 weeks from randomization and the new lesions were verified on the next bone scan >=6 weeks later (a total of >=2 new lesions compared to baseline); 2) progression of soft tissue lesions measured by computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); 3) death from any cause. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From randomization (Day 1) up to first radiographic progression or cutoff date (Month 18)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)NA
Placebo8.28

Time to Deterioration in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score by >=1 Point

The time interval from the date of randomization to the first date at which there was at least a 1 grade change (worsening) in the ECOG performance status grade. Participants who had no deterioration in ECOG performance status grade at the time of the analysis were censored at the last known date of no deterioration. ECOG is a 5-point scale, where 0=Fully active, 1=Ambulatory, carry out work of sedentary nature, 2=Ambulatory, capable of all self-care, 3=Capable of limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours, 4=Completely disabled, no self-care, totally confined to bed or chair, 5=Dead. Participants with no assessment were censored at the date of randomization. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From randomization (Day 1) up to first radiographic progression or cutoff date (Month 18)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)12.29
Placebo10.87

Time to Initiation of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

The time interval from the date of randomization to the date of initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer. Participants who had no cytotoxic chemotherapy administration at the time of analysis were censored at the last known date when no cytotoxic chemotherapy was administered. Participants with no assessment were censored at the date of randomization. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From randomization (Day 1) up to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy or cutoff date (Month 18)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)25.17
Placebo16.82

Time to Opiate Use for Prostate Cancer Pain

The time interval from the date of randomization to the date of opiate use for cancer pain. Participants who have no opiate use at the time of analysis were censored at the last known date of no opiate use for cancer pain. Participants with no assessment were censored at the date of randomization. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From randomization (Day 1) up to first opiate use or end of study (Month 60)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)33.38
Placebo23.39

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

The time interval from the date of randomization to the date of PSA progression as defined in the protocol-specific prostate cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria. A participant was considered to have a PSA progression if the PSA level had a 25 percent (%) or greater increase from nadir and an absolute increase of 2 nanogram/milliliter ((ng/mL) or more, which is confirmed by a second value obtained in 3 or more weeks. Participants who had no PSA progression at the time of the analysis were censored at the last known date of no PSA progression. Participants with no on-study PSA assessment or no baseline PSA assessment were censored at the date of randomization. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From randomization (Day 1) up to date of PSA progerssion or cutoff date (Month 18)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)11.07
Placebo5.55

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. (NCT00887198)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
With Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsWith Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone (AAP)541208
Placebo524148
Placebo to Abiraterone Acetate9339

Confirmed Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate

50% or greater decline in PSA from baseline. (NCT01576172)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone)46
Arm II (Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone, and Veliparib)55

Grade 4 or 5 Adverse Events

Grade 4 or greater toxicity graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 at least possibly related to treatment. (NCT01576172)
Timeframe: 30 days after completion of study treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone)1
Arm II (Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone, and Veliparib)3

Objective Response Rates in Patients With Measurable Disease.

Overall response per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01576172)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone)18
Arm II (Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone, and Veliparib)24

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Time from randomization to disease progression or death. (NCT01576172)
Timeframe: Up to 42 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone)10.1
Arm II (Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone, and Veliparib)11.0

Rates of PSA Decline

Change in PSA from baseline to 12 weeks (NCT01576172)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Arm I (Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone)-41.1
Arm II (Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone, and Veliparib)-52.9

Adrenal Androgen Production (DHEA-S)

Extragonadal serum adrogen (NCT01543776)
Timeframe: Cycle 4 (4 months)

Interventionmicrogram per deciliter (Mean)
Arm I (Fasting)13.30
Arm II (Fed)10.22

Change in PSA Level

Data were analyzed on a log scale: log(week 12) - log(baseline) = log ratio. Smaller (more negative) values indicate a better outcome. (NCT01543776)
Timeframe: From baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionlog ratio (Mean)
Arm I (Fasting)-1.19
Arm II (Fed)-1.59

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Patients with grade 3 or higher AE (CTCAE Version 4.03) (NCT01543776)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Fasting)6
Arm II (Fed)11

Peak Plasma Concentration of Abiraterone

Analyzed on a log scale due to skewness of distribution (NCT01543776)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months

Interventionlog(ng/mL) (Mean)
Arm I (Fasting)5.39
Arm II (Fed)4.65

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Time to PSA progression (25% increase from baseline), radiographic progression, or death. (NCT01543776)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 3 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm I (Fasting)8.6
Arm II (Fed)8.6

Number of Patients Achieving a Prostate-Specific Antigen Decline >=50%

A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as a >=50% decline from baseline. (NCT00638690)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Abiraterone Acetate232
Placebo22

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. (NCT00638690)
Timeframe: Up to 60 months

InterventionDays (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate450.0
Placebo332.0

Radiographic Progression-free Survival

Radiographic progression-free survival is based on imaging studies according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST): baseline lymph node size must be >=2.0 cm to be considered a target lesion; progression on bone scans with >=2 new lesions not consistent with tumor flare, confirmed on a second scan >=6 weeks later that shows >=1 additional new lesion. (NCT00638690)
Timeframe: Up to 11 months

InterventionDays (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate171.0
Placebo110.0

Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen Progression According to Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group Criteria

The time interval from the date of randomization to the date of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression as defined in the protocol-specific Prostate Specific Antigen Working Group (PSAWG) criteria, namely, a PSA level of at least 5 ng/ml that has risen on at least 2 successive occasions, at least 2 weeks apart. (NCT00638690)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionDays (Median)
Abiraterone Acetate309.0
Placebo200.0

Duration of Response

Length of time from the date of first observation of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the date of first observation of disease progression, according to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 1 (PCWG1) criteria. PSA response according to PCWG1 is defined as an least 50 percent decline in PSA level from baseline that was maintained for at least three weeks. (NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years.

Interventionweeks (Median)
All Study Participants Achieving PSA Response20.5

Number of Participants Achieving Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response.

Number of participants achieving prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 1 (PCWG1) criteria. PSA response according to PCWG1 is defined as an least 50 percent decline in PSA level from baseline that was maintained for at least three weeks. (NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase 1: Level 1 - 75 Aza + 60 Doc0
Phase 1: Level 2 - 75 Aza + 75 Doc1
Phase 1: Level 3 - 100 Aza + 75 Doc2
Phase 1: Level 4 - 150 Aza + 75 Doc4
Phase 2 - Aza + Doc Initial RPTD3
Phase 2 - Aza + Doc Reduced RPTD0

Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events After Beginning Protocol Therapy.

(NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Level 1 - 75 Aza + 60 Doc3
Level 2 - 75 Aza + 75 Doc4
Level 3 - 100 Aza + 75 Doc3
Level 4 - 150 Aza + 75 Doc12

Overall Survival (OS)

The time from the date of initiation of study treatment until date of death from any cause. (NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
All Study Participants19.5

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

The time from the date of start of treatment until the first documented or confirmed disease progression, or death related to prostate cancer, whichever is earlier. (NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
All Study Participants4.9

Number of Participants Achieving Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (CR) to Protocol Therapy.

"Number of participants achieving Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response to protocol therapy according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 Criteria. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; " (NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)
Phase 1: Level 1 - 75 Aza + 60 Doc00
Phase 1: Level 3 - 100 Aza + 75 Doc10
Phase 1: Level 4 - 150 Aza + 75 Doc01
Phase 2 - Aza + Doc Initial RPTD01

Phase I - Recommended Phase Two Dose (RPTD) of Azacitidine and Docetaxel in Combination With Prednisone. (Azacitidine and Docetaxel)

Determination of a safe and potentially efficacious phase II dose of azacitidine in combination with docetaxel and prednisone that can be used for the treatment of hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer. (NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

Interventionmg/m2 (Number)
Initial RPTD Azacitidine (mg/m2)Initial RPTD Docetaxel (mg/m2)Reduced RPTD Azacitidine (mg/m2)Reduced RPTD Docetaxel (mg/m2)
Phase 1 - Aza + Doc150757575

Phase I - Recommended Phase Two Dose (RPTD) of Azacitidine and Docetaxel in Combination With Prednisone. (Prednisone)

Determination of a safe and potentially efficacious phase II dose of azacitidine in combination with docetaxel and prednisone that can be used for the treatment of hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer. (NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

Interventionmg (Number)
Initial RPTD Prednisone (mg)Reduced RPTD Prednisone (mg)
Phase 1 - Aza + Doc55

Overall Survival Time

"Overall survival (OS) time was measured as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.~The median OS time and its 95.6% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of confirmation of death, the participant was censored at the last date he/she was known to be alive or the study cut-off date (when 873 deaths have occurred), whichever was earlier." (NCT00519285)
Timeframe: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo21.22
Aflibercept22.14

Pain Progression-free Survival Time

"Pain progression was defined as either ≥1-point increase in Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score or ≥25% increase in Analgesics Score (AS) confirmed at least 3 weeks later, or requirement for palliative radiotherapy. PPI scale is a self-report 0-5 scale to assess pain intensity - a score 0 reflects no pain, a score 5 reflects excruciating pain. AS is a scoring method to assess analgesics consumption. Each analgesic is scored 1 or 4 depending on the analgesic type and dose. AS is the sum of the analgesic scores.~Pain progression-free survival (PFS) time was measured as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of first pain progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.~The median pain-PFS and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of event, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of pain progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier." (NCT00519285)
Timeframe: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo9.72
Aflibercept9.20

Pain Response Rate

Pain response was defined as either a ≥2-point decrease from baseline in Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score without increase in Analgesics Score (AS), or a ≥50% decrease from baseline in AS without increase in the PPI score confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases in PPI or AS during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining pain response. (NCT00519285)
Timeframe: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to pain progression or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo46.3
Aflibercept35.8

Progression Free Survival Time

"Disease progression was defined as a composite of: Radiological tumor progression (≥20% increase in target lesions, or appearance of at least 2 new bone lesions); PSA progression (≥25% increase in PSA level confirmed 3 weeks later); Pain progression (increase in pain intensity or in analgesic consumption for cancer related pain confirmed 3 weeks later); Radiotherapy for cancer related symptoms; Occurence of Skeletal related events (SRE).~Progression Free survival (PFS) time was measured as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of occurrence of the first event defining a disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.~The median PFS time and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of disease progression, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier." (NCT00519285)
Timeframe: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo6.24
Aflibercept6.90

Prostate Specific Antigen Progression-free Survival Time

"Prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression was defined as ≥25% increase in PSA level confirmed 3 weeks later, above the nadir in participants who had achieved a PSA response, or above the baseline in participants who hadn't achieved a PSA response.~PSA progression-free survival (PFS) time was defined as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of the first documented PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.~The median PSA-PFS time and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of PSA progression or death, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier." (NCT00519285)
Timeframe: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo8.11
Aflibercept8.25

Prostate Specific Antigen Response Rate

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as ≥50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases of any magnitude during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining PSA response. (NCT00519285)
Timeframe: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to PSA progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo63.5
Aflibercept68.6

Time to Skeletal Related Events

"Skeletal Related Events (SRE) included pathological fractures and/or spinal cord compression, need for bone irradiation, including radioisotopes or bone surgery, change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain.~Time to SRE was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of occurence of the first event defining a SRE or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.~The median time to SRE and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of SRE, the participant was censored at the last date he/she was known to be alive or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier." (NCT00519285)
Timeframe: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo14.98
Aflibercept15.31

Tumor Response Rate in Participants With Measurable Disease

Tumor response was defined as either a Complete Response (disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (≥30% decrease from baseline in target lesions) as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)version 1.0. (NCT00519285)
Timeframe: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 months up to tumor progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo28.1
Aflibercept38.7

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life

"Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of patients with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 subscales assessing physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and prostate-specific concerns.~FACT-P total score is the sum of the 5 subscores. It ranges from 0 to 156 with higher score indicating better quality of life." (NCT00519285)
Timeframe: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks until disease progression or administration of further antitumor therapy, whichever came first

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Change from baseline at cycle 1 (n =493, 461)Change from baseline at cycle 2 (n =467, 437)Change from baseline at cycle 6 (n =293, 224)Change from baseline at cycle 10 (n =158, 117)
Aflibercept1.30-0.03-1.00-1.60
Placebo5.086.225.506.61

Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety

"Adverse Events (AE) are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study.~AE were collected at regular intervals throughout the study then graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE v.3.0)." (NCT00519285)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came first) to last dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came last) + 30 days

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any Adverse Event- Grade 3-4 AE- Serious AE- AE leading to death--- Related AE leading to death- AE leading to permanent discontinuation- AE leading to premature discontinuation
Aflibercept6074703314619268116
Placebo58529018423812573

Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept

"Serum for detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) was collected in patients treated in selected centers only. Samples were analyzed using a titer-based, bridging immunoassay developed and validated to detect ADAs in human serum.~Samples with positive antibody levels were further analyzed using a validated, non-quantitative ligand binding assay to detect neutralizing antibodies Ab).~A participant was considered to have positive antibody levels if antibodies were detected above the quantification limits." (NCT00519285)
Timeframe: Pre-dose of cycle 1 (baseline), pre-dose of each every other cycle, then 30 and 90 days after the last administration of the study drug

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
At baselineAt any time post-baseline- Neutralizing Ab- Not neutralizing Ab- Neutralizing potential not evaluated
Aflibercept29252
Placebo04022

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

(NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone345
Orteronel + Prednisone719

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

(NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Cycle 59 Day 58

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone1
Orteronel + Prednisone3

Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings

(NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone0
Orteronel + Prednisone1

Number of Participants With Best Pain Response

Best pain response was evaluated in participants who had a pain response across the entire study were summarized by treatment group. The pain response was defined as a >=2-point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone72
Orteronel + Prednisone166

Overall Survival

Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone15.3
Orteronel + Prednisone17.1

Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 12

The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone9.9
Orteronel + Prednisone24.9

Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12

The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone2.83
Orteronel + Prednisone9.66

Percentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 12

The global health status or quality of life (QOL) was measured as the HRQOL response rate at 12 weeks using the 2-item global health status index of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer-quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) instrument. HRQOL response was defined as a 17-point increase from the baseline assessment on the QOL index, after the score had been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30: included 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 1 global health status, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and 6 single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score representing better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone9.9
Orteronel + Prednisone8.7

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. The overall objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). A complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to <10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter(s) or short axis of lymph nodes. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone2.7
Orteronel + Prednisone17.1

Percentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 12

Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A greater than or equal to (>=) 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use; or a 25 percent (%) or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone9.0
Orteronel + Prednisone12.1

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

rPFS was defined as the time from randomization until radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: The appearance of 2 or more new lesions on radionuclide bone scan as defined by prostate cancer working group (PCWG)2; Should 2 or more new bone lesions be evident at the first assessment (8-week assessment) on treatment, 2 or more additional new lesions must have been evident on a confirmatory assessment at least 6 weeks later; One or more new soft tissue/visceral organ lesions identified by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Progression as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone5.7
Orteronel + Prednisone8.3

Time to Pain Progression

Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was >= 4 with a >= 2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was >= 4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was <= 3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline until EOT visit or until end of short term follow-up, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone22.0
Orteronel + Prednisone24.2

Time to Pain Response

Time to pain response was defined as the time from randomization until first pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A >= 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + PrednisoneNA
Orteronel + PrednisoneNA

Time to PSA Progression

Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25% and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, above the baseline PSA. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone2.9
Orteronel + Prednisone5.5

Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)

A favorable CTC count was defined as less than (<) 5 counts per (/) 7.5 mililiter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as >=5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline and EOT (Cycle 59 Day 58)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: Favorable; EOT: FavorableBaseline: Favorable; EOT: UnfavorableBaseline: Unfavorable; EOT: FavorableBaseline: Unfavorable; EOT: Unfavorable
Orteronel + Prednisone634023141
Placebo + Prednisone2730892

Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel

(NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Digestive enzymesRenal function analysesLiver function analysesTissue enzyme analyses NECCoagulation and bleeding analysesMineral and electrolyte analysesWhite blood cell analysesCarbohydrate tolerance analyses-including diabetesUrinary tract function analyses NECPlatelet analysesCholesterol analysesRed blood cell analysesProtein analyses not elsewhere classified (NEC)Vascular tests NEC (including blood pressure)Adrenal cortex testsMetabolism tests NECSkeletal and cardiac muscle analysesTriglyceride analysesUrinalysis NECVitamin analyses
Orteronel + Prednisone14041383017988544332222111
Placebo + Prednisone91314161540131203000000

Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs

(NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
HypertensionHypotensionPyrexia
Orteronel + Prednisone833151
Placebo + Prednisone21818

Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight

(NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Weight decreasedWeight increased
Orteronel + Prednisone1076
Placebo + Prednisone327

Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50% of waking hours [hrs]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Baseline up to End-of-treatment (EOT) (Cycle 59 Day 58)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: 0; Overall: 0Baseline: 0; Overall: 1Baseline: 0; Overall: 2Baseline: 0; Overall: 3Baseline: 0; Overall: 4Baseline: 1; Overall: 0Baseline: 1; Overall: 1Baseline: 1; Overall: 2Baseline: 1; Overall: 3Baseline: 1; Overall: 4Baseline: 2; Overall: 1Baseline: 2; Overall: 2Baseline: 2; Overall: 3Baseline: 2; Overall: 4
Orteronel + Prednisone11212147183101791133911625183
Placebo + Prednisone56701351310353227010100

Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study

The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cycle 4 (n= 283; 559)Cycle 7 (n= 163; 403)Cycle 10 (n= 102; 267)Cycle 13 (n= 55; 171)Cycle 16 (n= 34; 107)Cycle 19 (n= 24; 68)Cycle 22 (n= 14; 36)Cycle 25 (n= 8; 16)
Orteronel + Prednisone32.7438.2136.7040.9444.8642.6552.7862.50
Placebo + Prednisone12.7218.4022.5523.6423.5320.8328.5725.00

Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study

The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline. (NCT01193257)
Timeframe: Cycle: 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cycle 7 (n=163; 403)Cycle 10 (n=102; 267)Cycle 13 (n=55; 171)Cycle 16 (n=34; 107)Cycle 19 (n=24; 68)Cycle 22 (n=14; 36)Cycle 25 (n=8; 16)
Orteronel + Prednisone14.8914.2315.2019.6323.5327.7843.75
Placebo + Prednisone4.916.867.275.884.170.000.00

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

(NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to EOT (Cycle 61 Day 58)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg130
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg163

Overall Survival

Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (up to 4.7 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg29.5
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg29.9

Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50) Response at Week 12

The PSA50 is defined as a decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg24.6
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg42.6

Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12

The PSA90 is defined as a decline of PSA by 90 percent from baseline. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg5.4
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg16.7

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) Levels at Week 12

A favorable CTC count was defined as less than <5 counts per 7.5 milliliter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg9.1
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg15.4

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to <10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter or short axis of lymph nodes. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg15.2
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg34.7

Percentage of Participants With Skeletal Related Events (SRE)

Skeletal related (SRE) event is defined as a fracture or spinal cord compression or the need for radiation or surgery at the site of a prostate cancer metastatic lesion that is substantiated by radiographic or pathologic evidence. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg10.9
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg8.6

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first objective evidence of radiographic disease progression assessed by independent central radiology review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was evaluated by computerized tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radionuclide bone scans at regularly scheduled visits. Radiographic disease progression in bone required a confirmatory scan. Radiographic disease progression in soft tissue did not require a confirmatory scan for purposes of analysis. Radiographic disease progression was evaluated by independent central radiology review using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 for soft tissue disease and Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) guidelines for bone disease. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were censored at their last assessment. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline until radiographic disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg8.7
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg13.8

Time to Deterioration in Global Health Status

Global health status deterioration is defined as a drop greater than 16 points from the baseline assessment, confirmed at least 3 weeks later, on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Module 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) index after the score has been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions, where question 1 to 28 can be answered with 1: Not at all, 2: A little, 3: Quite a bit, 4: Very much and question 29 to 30 with 1: Very poor to 7: Excellent. For subscales a high score from 0-100 indicates: high global quality of life, high level of functioning (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social) or a high level of symptoms (fatigue, nausea, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea, financial difficulties). (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline until EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg10.7
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg8.3

Time to Docetaxel Chemotherapy

Time to docetaxel based chemotherapy is defined as the time from randomization to the start of docetaxel based chemotherapy for prostate cancer, regardless of whether the participant received concurrent orteronel or not. Deaths due to disease progression prior to Docetaxel based chemotherapy were considered as events. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline until start of docetaxel chemotherapy (up to 4.7 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg19.0
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg23.0

Time to Pain Progression

Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was >=4 with a >=2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was >=4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was <=3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use. BPI-SF was an 11-item questionnaire, designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Total score ranged from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of less pain or pain interference. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline until End of treatment (EOT) (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNA
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNA

Time to PSA Progression

Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25 percent and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, compared to baseline PSA. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg5.59
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg8.3

Time to SRE

Time to SRE is defined as the time from randomization to SRE, or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. SRE is defined as a fracture or spinal cord compression or the need for radiation or surgery at the site of a prostate cancer metastatic lesion that is substantiated by radiographic or pathologic evidence. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to EOT (Cycle 61 Day 58)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg9.0
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg13.9

Time to Subsequent Antineoplastic Therapy

Time to subsequent antineoplastic therapy is defined as the time from randomization to the start of any alternate antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer. Deaths due to disease progression prior to antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer are considered as events. Otherwise, time to next therapy is censored at the date of death or the last date the participant was known to be alive or the data cutoff date, whichever is earlier. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline until start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (up to 4.7 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg13.9
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg17.2

Worst Change From Baseline Over Time in Cardiac Ejection Fraction

Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in cardiac ejection fraction at any measured time point. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days or EOT whichever is later (approximately up to Cycle 61 Day 58)

Interventionpercent ejection fraction (Mean)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg-3.8
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg-4.8

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

(NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAESerious Adverse Events (SAE)
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg769380
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg733321

Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Coagulation

(NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days or EOT whichever is later (approximately up to Cycle 61 Day 58)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
InvestigationsBlood and lymphatic system disordersMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg399107336
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg215114204

Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs

(NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
HypertensionPyrexiaHypotension
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg984126
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg762612

Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight

(NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Weight decreasedWeight increased
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg11910
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg4736

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3

Grade 3 (Severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death. Grade 5 (Death) events=death related to an AE. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 3 or higher TEAEGrade 5 (Death)
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg53777
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg40578

Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50 percent of waking hours [hrs]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair >50 percent of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Baseline until EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: 0; Overall: 0Baseline: 0; Overall: 1Baseline: 0; Overall: 2Baseline: 0; Overall: 3Baseline: 0; Overall: 4Baseline: 1; Overall: 0Baseline: 1; Overall: 1Baseline: 1; Overall: 2Baseline: 1; Overall: 3Baseline: 1; Overall: 4Baseline: 2; Overall: 2
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg200237661576147602661
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg251177472276162572821

Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study

The PSA50 is defined as a decline of PSA by 50 percent from baseline. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 and 37

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cycle 4 (n= 687, 672)Cycle 7 (n= 541, 540)Cycle 10 (n= 438, 450)Cycle 13 (n= 344, 382)Cycle 16 (n= 286, 303)Cycle 19 (n= 228, 272)Cycle 22 (n= 184, 211)Cycle 25 (n= 109, 119)Cycle 28 (n= 67, 77)Cycle 31 (n= 35, 39)Cycle 34 (n= 22, 18)Cycle 37 (n= 7, 5)
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg49.7054.8156.0053.1454.1352.9454.0346.2248.0548.7238.8940.00
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg28.0934.9436.9937.2134.2737.7233.1535.7844.7834.2936.3671.43

Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study

The PSA90 is defined as a decline of PSA by 90 percent from baseline. (NCT01193244)
Timeframe: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 and 37

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cycle 4 (n= 687, 672)Cycle 7 (n= 541, 540)Cycle 10 (n= 438, 450)Cycle 13 (n= 344, 382)Cycle 16 (n= 286, 303)Cycle 19 (n= 228, 272)Cycle 22 (n= 184, 211)Cycle 25 (n= 109, 119)Cycle 28 (n= 67, 77)Cycle 31 (n= 35, 39)Cycle 34 (n= 22, 18)Cycle 37 (n= 7, 5)
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg16.6722.2226.4426.1825.7426.1028.4421.0127.2712.8222.2220.00
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg5.398.6911.6412.7912.2412.7210.8711.0116.428.574.5514.29

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) was the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. If no death was reported for a participant before the cut-off date for OS analysis, OS was censored at the last date at which the participant was alive. The median OS was calculated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the method provided by Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT00988208)
Timeframe: From randomization until death from any cause up to the cut-off date of 13 January 2012; up to approximately 26 months

Interventionweeks (Median)
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Placebo (DP)NA
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Lenalidomide (DPL)77

Percentage of Participants Who Received Post-Study Therapies

Percentage of Participants Who Received Post-Study Therapies for advanced Prostate Cancer. (NCT00988208)
Timeframe: The date when the first consent form was signed to the last date of AE data collection;up to 5 years; up to the date of the final data analysis date of 20 April 2017

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Placebo (DP)70.8
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Lenalidomide (DPL)69.0

Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors - RECIST Version 1.1 Criteria

Objective response (OR) is defined as having complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as best overall response based on RECIST Criteria 1.1 and defines a CR = Disappearance of all target lesions except lymph nodes (LN); LN must have a decrease in the short axis to <10mm; PR = 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; Progressed Disease (PD) = 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of diameters and an absolute increase of ≥5 mm; the appearance of ≥1 new lesions; Stable Disease (SD)= Neither shrinkage to qualify for PR nor increase to qualify for PD taking the smallest sum diameters on study as reference. For non-target lesions a CR = Disappearance of all non-target lesions and all LN must be non-pathological in size <10 mm; Non-CR/Non PD: persistence of one or more non-target lesions; PD = unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or appearance of new ones (NCT00988208)
Timeframe: From day 1 to data cut-off 13 January 2012; maximum time on study was approximately 26 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Placebo (DP)24.3
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Lenalidomide (DPL)22.1

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was the time from randomization to disease progression, or death, whatever occurred first. Progression criteria was met by analysis of target and non-target lesions as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 criteria. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the diameters while on study or the appearance of one or more new lesions; an increase of at least 5mm as a total sum. Lymph nodes identified as target lesions (≥ 15 mm diameter in short axis) will be followed and reported by changes in diameter of short axis; or the unequivocal progression of a non-target lesion defined as an increase in the overall disease burden based on the change in non-measurable disease that is comparable in scope to the increase required to declare PD for measurable disease; Two or more new bone lesions as detected by bone scan (NCT00988208)
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression or death from any cause; up to the cut-off date of 13 Jan 2012; maximum time on study was approximately 26 months

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Placebo (DP)46
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Lenalidomide (DPL)45

Time to Onset of Secondary Primary Malignancies

Time of Onset of Secondary Primary Malignancies was considered an event of interest (NCT00988208)
Timeframe: The date when the first consent form was signed to the last date of AE data collection; up to the date of the final data analysis date of 30 November 2016; 7 years and 19 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Placebo (DP)29.7
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Lenalidomide (DPL)19.7

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

A TEAE is defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose of study drug. A TESAE is defined as any serious adverse event (SAE) occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the last dose of study drug. Safety and severity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0; Severity of AEs were graded (including second primary malignancies) as Grade 1- Mild; Grade 2- Moderate; Grade 3- Severe; Grade 4- Life-threatening; Grade 5-Fatal; (NCT00988208)
Timeframe: From the time from of first dose of study drug administration to 28 days after the last dose of study drug and up to the data cut off date of 13 January 2012; the maximum duration of study drug was 93 weeks for DP and 90.6 weeks for DPL

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAEAny TEAE related to lenalidomide or placeboAny TEAE related to docetaxel/prednisoneAny severity grade 3-4 TEAEAny serious AE (SAE)Any SAE related to lenalidomide or placeboAny SAE related to docetaxel/prednisoneAny AE causing discontinuation of lenalidomide/PBOAny AE causing withdrawal of docetaxel/prednisoneAny TEAE leading to death
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Lenalidomide (DPL)51741248138127916718215016924
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Placebo (DP)51237947530317162868212716

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Primary Malignancies During the Course of the Trial

Second primary malignancies were monitored as events of interest and reported as serious adverse events throughout the course of the trial. (NCT00988208)
Timeframe: The date when the first consent form was signed to the last date of AE data collection; up to the date of the final data analysis date of 30 November 2016; 7 years and 19 days

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Invasive Secondary Primary MalignanciesNon-invasive Secondary Primary Malignancies
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Lenalidomide (DPL)1.71.0
Docetaxel/Prednisone/Placebo (DP)1.30.4

Composite Progression-free Survival (cPFS)

"Defined as the median time from randomization to the earliest of:~Tumor progression by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST);~Evidence of progression by bone scan, performed after completion of the first 3 cycles, demonstrating the appearance of >=2 new lesions;~New skeletal events (New pathologic bone fracture in the region of metastatic disease; New bone lesion requiring radiation or surgery; Spinal cord or nerve root compression)~Symptomatic progression (for participants without measurable disease);~Other clinical events attributable to prostate cancer that require major interventions; or~Death from any cause~Participants who were ongoing with no progression or who discontinued treatment for reasons other than progression were censored at date of last assessment. Participants who started new anticancer treatment before progression were censored at date of last assessment before start of new anti-cancer therapy." (NCT00683475)
Timeframe: Randomization to composite progressive disease, up to 23.4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-A12 + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone4.1
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone6.7

Composite Progression-free Survival (cPFS) at 12-months

"Data presented are the percentage of participants without disease progression at 12 months.~Participants who were ongoing with no progression or who discontinued treatment for reasons other than progression were censored at date of last assessment. Participants who started new anticancer treatment before progression were censored at date of last assessment before start of new anti-cancer therapy." (NCT00683475)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-A12 + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone12.4
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone20.0

Composite Progression-free Survival (cPFS) at 6-months

"Data presented are the percentage of participants without disease progression at 6 months.~Participants who were ongoing with no progression or who discontinued treatment for reasons other than progression were censored at date of last assessment. Participants who started new anticancer treatment before progression were censored at date of last assessment before start of new anti-cancer therapy." (NCT00683475)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-A12 + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone37.2
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone59.2

Composite Progression-free Survival (cPFS) at 9-months

"Data presented are the percentage of participants without disease progression at 9 months.~Participants who were ongoing with no progression or who discontinued treatment for reasons other than progression were censored at date of last assessment. Participants who started new anticancer treatment before progression were censored at date of last assessment before start of new anti-cancer therapy." (NCT00683475)
Timeframe: 9 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-A12 + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone20.7
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone35.9

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

"Objective response is Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR), as classified by the investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines. CR is a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions without new lesions and progression of non-target lesions.~Objective response rate is calculated as a total number of participants with CR or PR divided by the total number of participants with measurable disease, multiplied by 100." (NCT00683475)
Timeframe: Baseline to date of progressive disease or death up to 36.3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-A12 + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone15.2
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone31.6

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants who were alive at the time of study completion were censored at the time the participant was last known to be alive. (NCT00683475)
Timeframe: First dose to death due to any cause up to 36.3 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-A12 + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone10.8
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone13.0

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate

PSA response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a decrease in PSA >= 50 percent from baseline. (NCT00683475)
Timeframe: Baseline up to data cut-off date (up to 36.3 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IMC-A12 + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone18.5
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone21.4

Time to Radiographic Evidence of Disease Progression

"Time between date of randomization and earliest date of radiographic progression defined as either:~Tumor progression by RECIST;~Evidence of progression by bone scan;~New skeletal events (New pathologic bone fracture in the region of metastatic disease; New bone lesion requiring radiation or surgery; Spinal cord or nerve root compression).~Participants who were ongoing with no radiographic evidence of disease progression, who discontinued treatment for reasons other than progression,or died before progression were censored at date of last tumor or bone radiographic assessment. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment before progression were censored at date of last tumor or bone radiographic assessment before start of new anti-cancer therapy." (NCT00683475)
Timeframe: Randomization to date of radiographic progression, up to 36.3 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IMC-A12 + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone7.5
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone10.2

Summary Listing of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

Data presented are the number of participants who experienced A12 or 1121B (ramucirumab) related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), treatment related serious adverse events (SAE), or any Grade 3 or higher TEAE; any TEAE leading to discontinuation of A12 or 1121B (ramucirumab) treatment, and any TEAE leading to dose modification of A12 or 1121B (ramucirumab). A summary of SAEs and other nonserious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Event section. (NCT00683475)
Timeframe: Randomization to 36.3 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
A12/1121B Related TEAEA12/1121B Related Serious TEAEA12/1121B Related Grade >= 3 TEAETEAE Leading to Dose Modification of A12/1121BTEAE Leading to Discontinuation of A12/1121B
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab) + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone6316313525
IMC-A12 + Mitoxantrone + Prednisone6422353518

Overall Survival

Overall Survival as measured by the Kaplan-Meier method (NCT01051570)
Timeframe: After treatment, participants will be contacted every 3 months up to 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Carboplatin, RAD 001 & Prednisone12.5

Pharmacokinetics: Observed Carboplatin AUC Was Estimated Based on the Concentration in the 2.75-h Sample.

Using a limited sampling model (i.e., AUC = 0.52 × C2.75h + 0.92) (Sorensen et al., 1993), observed carboplatin AUC was estimated based on the concentration in the 2.75-h sample. (NCT01051570)
Timeframe: Samples were collected Cycle 2, Day 1

Interventionmg/ml*min (Mean)
Carboplatin, RAD 001 & Prednisone5.8

PSA Response Rate

PSA response rate with response defined as => a 30% reduction in PSA (NCT01051570)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 21 days), through study completion, an average of 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Carboplatin, RAD 001 & Prednisone15

Time to Progression (TTP)

Progression defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT01051570)
Timeframe: Up to 63 days while on treatment, then up 90 days thereafter. From date of registration to date of progressive disease.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Carboplatin, RAD 001 & Prednisone2.5

Association of PSA Response Rate With Correlative Markers (Phospho mTOR, pAKT, and p70S6)

PSA response defined as a decrease of 30% or more will be tabled against mTOR, pAKT, and p70S6 (1+, 2+, 3+ vs ND) (NCT01051570)
Timeframe: Archival tissue will be collected if available. Optional biopsies pre-treatment and 24 hours after first everolimus and carboplatin dose

Interventionparticipants (Number)
pAKT(ND) vs RespondermTOR(ND) vs Responderp70S6(ND) vs Responder
Carboplatin, RAD 001 & Prednisone101

Number of Participants With Toxicity as Measured by NCI CTCAE v3.0 Criteria

Number of Participants with Grade 3/4 Toxicity as measured by NCI CTCAE v3.0 criteria (NCT01051570)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 21 days), through study completion, an average of 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AnemiaThrombocytopeniaLymphopeniaLeukopeniaInfection without neutropeniaHypophosphatemiaNeutropeniaDehydrationHyperglycemiaHyponatremiaPulmonary embolismFatigueHypercholesterolemiaRashASTHypomagnesemiaHypokalemia
Carboplatin, RAD 001 & Prednisone109644433332211111

Bone Scan Response (BSR)

BSR is defined as >=30% reduction in the bone scan lesion area (BSLA) compared with baseline. Confirmation of bone scan was not required for response or progression. Bone scans were evaluated by an independent radiology facility (IRF) for response. (NCT01605227)
Timeframe: BSR was measured at the end of Week 12 as determined by the IRF

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cabozantinib42
Prednisone3

Overall Survival (OS)

The primary analysis of OS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants that had not died or were permanently lost to follow-up were censored at the last known date alive. Median OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Analysis for OS was performed after 614 events had occurred. (NCT01605227)
Timeframe: OS was measured from the time of randomization until 614 events, approximately 24 months after study start

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cabozantinib11.0
Prednisone9.8

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The exploratory analysis of PFS is the time from randomization to date of first documented radiographic progression (bone and/or soft tissue) according to the investigator's assessment or death. PFS was defined per mRECIST 1.1 and included evaluation of measurable, nonmeasurable, target and nontarget lesions. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate the median duration. (NCT01605227)
Timeframe: Duration of PFS was defined as time from the date of randomization to earlier of date of radiographic progression (bone/andor soft tissue) according to the investigator's assessment or death, assessed for up to approximately 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cabozantinib5.6
Prednisone2.8

Number of Participants With ≥ 30% Change in PSA

The primary objective of this study is to determine a correlation between inherited genetic polymorphisms and antitumor activity (as defined by a decline in PSA of ≥ 30%) in AA patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with Abiraterone. The primary endpoint is the percent change in PSA from baseline to 12 weeks. A decline of ≥ 30% will be correlated with germline SNPs. (NCT01735396)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone Acetate9

Safety of Abiraterone

To determine the safety of abiraterone Adverse events as defined by CTCAE v4. Number of participants with serious adverse events grade 4 or 5 (NCT01735396)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abiraterone Acetate0

Response Assessment

Post-treatment changes in measurable disease by RECIST - Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions (NCT01735396)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PRSD
Abiraterone Acetate91

Number of Participants With a PSA Value Equal to or Greater Than 25%

Compared between the two patient subsets using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. A comparison of CTC counts between baseline and at progression for those who have progressed will be carried out using either a paired t test or the nonparameteric Wilcoxon matched pairs test. (NCT01848067)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Alisertib, Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone)3

Phase I: Frequency of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Alisertib, Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.1

Summarized with descriptive statistics. (NCT01848067)
Timeframe: Up to 21 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Alisertib, Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone)2

Reviews

37 reviews available for prednisone and Androgen-Independent Prostatic Cancer

ArticleYear
Ketoconazole for the Treatment of Docetaxel-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): A Systematic Review.
    Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2021, Oct-01, Volume: 22, Issue:10

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antifungal Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemother

2021
The safety of radium-223 combined with new-generation hormonal agents in bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Asian journal of andrology, 2023, Volume: 25, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Male;

2023
Association between RCT methodology and disease indication with mineralocorticoid-related toxicity for patients receiving abiraterone acetate for advanced prostate cancer: A meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2023, Volume: 21, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cardiotoxicity; Humans; Hyperte

2023
Cost-effectiveness analysis of 7 treatments in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a public-payer perspective.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2023, Nov-08, Volume: 115, Issue:11

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Bayes Theorem; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Do

2023
Corticosteroid switch after progression on abiraterone acetate plus prednisone.
    International journal of clinical oncology, 2020, Volume: 25, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap

2020
Clinical outcomes in men of diverse ethnic backgrounds with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2020, Volume: 31, Issue:7

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Ethnicity; Humans;

2020
Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for castrate-resistant prostate cancer.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2020, Volume: 21, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides; Clinic

2020
Abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone in the treatment of prostate cancer: safety and efficacy.
    Expert review of anticancer therapy, 2020, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols;

2020
Optimal treatment sequencing of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and enzalutamide in patients with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cancer treatment reviews, 2021, Volume: 93

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides; Humans; Male; Nitri

2021
Quality of life in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2021, Volume: 24, Issue:4

    Topics: Androstenes; Benzamides; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Prednison

2021
Steroid switch after progression on abiraterone plus prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review.
    Urologic oncology, 2021, Volume: 39, Issue:11

    Topics: Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Pred

2021
Abiraterone Acetate: A Review in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostrate Cancer.
    Drugs, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:14

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxe

2017
Effect of Single-agent Daily Prednisone on Outcomes and Toxicities in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Prospective Studies.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2018, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Progression-Free Surviva

2018
Treatment of Castration-naive Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
    European urology focus, 2017, Volume: 3, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined

2017
Second-line therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with progression after or under docetaxel: A systematic review of nine randomized controlled trials.
    Seminars in oncology, 2017, Volume: 44, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides; Disease-Free Surviv

2017
The efficacy and safety comparison of docetaxel, cabazitaxel, estramustine, and mitoxantrone for castration-resistant prostate cancer: A network meta-analysis.
    International journal of surgery (London, England), 2018, Volume: 56

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Estramustine

2018
Cost-effectiveness analyses and cost analyses in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review.
    PloS one, 2018, Volume: 13, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bias; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mitoxantrone; N

2018
Overall Survival of Black and White Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Docetaxel.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019, 02-10, Volume: 37, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Black People; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; D

2019
Abiraterone acetate to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in combination with prednisone.
    Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998), 2019, Volume: 55, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Pros

2019
Management of anticoagulation in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving abiraterone + prednisone.
    Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, Volume: 27, Issue:9

    Topics: Androstenes; Anticoagulants; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols;

2019
Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: patient-reported outcome results of a randomised phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2013, Volume: 14, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Activities of Daily Living; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap

2013
Abiraterone acetate: a review of its use in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Drugs, 2013, Volume: 73, Issue:18

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstadienes; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Doc

2013
Impact of prednisone on toxicities and survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 2014, Volume: 90, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Odds Ratio; Prednisone; Proportional H

2014
Abiraterone for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2014, Volume: 15, Issue:3

    Topics: Androstenes; Androstenols; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro

2014
Secondary hormonal manipulation in castration resistant prostate cancer.
    The Canadian journal of urology, 2014, Volume: 21, Issue:2 Supp 1

    Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androstenes; Androstenols; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Benzamides; Drug T

2014
Practical guide to the use of enzalutamide.
    The Canadian journal of urology, 2014, Volume: 21, Issue:2 Supp 1

    Topics: Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Androstenes; Androstenols; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzamides; Drug Th

2014
Practical guide to the use of chemotherapy in castration resistant prostate cancer.
    The Canadian journal of urology, 2014, Volume: 21, Issue:2 Supp 1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Docetaxel; Drug Therapy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male; Practice Gu

2014
[Use of abiraterone acetate in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer and no prior chemotherapy: 3 case reports and literature review].
    Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2014, Aug-18, Volume: 46, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease Progressio

2014
PSA response rate as a surrogate marker for median overall survival in docetaxel-based first-line treatments for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis of 22 trials.
    Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014, Volume: 35, Issue:11

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers; Clinical Trials as Topic; Docetaxel; Hum

2014
Systemic therapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer:American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2014, Oct-20, Volume: 32, Issue:30

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstadienes; Benzamides; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nitri

2014
Use of prednisone with abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    The oncologist, 2014, Volume: 19, Issue:12

    Topics: Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Disease Progression; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Metastasis

2014
Corticosteroids in the management of prostate cancer: a critical review.
    Current treatment options in oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Dru

2015
The evolving role of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the management of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
    Current treatment options in oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Ph

2015
[How to manage patients with CRPC?].
    Bulletin du cancer, 2015, Volume: 102, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineop

2015
Interim Results From ERADICATE: An Open-Label Phase 2 Study of Radium Ra 223 Dichloride With Concurrent Administration of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Subjects With Symptomatic Bone Metastases.
    Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2016, Volume: 14, Issue:4 Suppl 5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Chemoradiothera

2016
Abiraterone Acetate for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of an NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
    PharmacoEconomics, 2017, Volume: 35, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Cos

2017
[Strategies for First-Line Treatment of mCRPC].
    Aktuelle Urologie, 2016, Volume: 47, Issue:5

    Topics: Androstenes; Benzamides; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Staging; Nitriles; Phenyl

2016

Trials

130 trials available for prednisone and Androgen-Independent Prostatic Cancer

ArticleYear
Apalutamide plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus placebo plus abiraterone and prednisone in metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (ACIS): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multinational, phase 3 study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2021, Volume: 22, Issue:11

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Proto

2021
TAXOMET: A French Prospective Multicentric Randomized Phase II Study of Docetaxel Plus Metformin Versus Docetaxel Plus Placebo in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2021, Volume: 19, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Metf

2021
Impact of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer and visceral metastases over four years of follow-up: A post-hoc exploratory analysis of the LATITUDE study.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2022, Volume: 162

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Castratio

2022
Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy, Docetaxel, and Prednisone vs Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The VIABLE Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    JAMA oncology, 2022, 04-01, Volume: 8, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dendritic Cells; Docetaxel; Double-Blind Metho

2022
A Phase Ib/II Study of the CDK4/6 Inhibitor Ribociclib in Combination with Docetaxel plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022, 04-14, Volume: 28, Issue:8

    Topics: Aminopyridines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4; Docetaxel

2022
Pembrolizumab Plus Docetaxel and Prednisone in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Long-term Results from the Phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 Cohort B Study.
    European urology, 2022, Volume: 82, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combine

2022
Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone for metastatic patients starting hormone therapy: 5-year follow-up results from the STAMPEDE randomised trial (NCT00268476).
    International journal of cancer, 2022, 08-01, Volume: 151, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Fol

2022
LHRH sparing therapy in patients with chemotherapy-naïve, mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone: results of the randomized phase II SPARE trial.
    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2022, Volume: 25, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Gonadotro

2022
Effects of metformin and statins on outcomes in men with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer: Secondary analysis of COU-AA-301 and COU-AA-302.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2022, Volume: 170

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Castration; Disease-Free Surviv

2022
Fatigue, health-related quality-of-life and metabolic changes in men treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A randomised clinical trial (HEAT).
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2022, Volume: 171

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamide

2022
Comments on "Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone for metastatic patients starting hormone therapy: 5-year follow-up results from the STAMPEDE randomised trial (NCT00268476)".
    International journal of cancer, 2022, Dec-15, Volume: 151, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Follow-Up

2022
Patient-reported outcomes with olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2022, Volume: 23, Issue:10

    Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Doceta

2022
Mitigating ipatasertib-induced glucose increase through dose and meal timing modifications.
    Clinical and translational science, 2022, Volume: 15, Issue:12

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Glucos

2022
Clinical Outcomes of First Subsequent Therapies After Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone for High-Risk Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in the LATITUDE Study.
    Targeted oncology, 2023, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Castratio

2023
Clinical Outcomes of First Subsequent Therapies After Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone for High-Risk Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in the LATITUDE Study.
    Targeted oncology, 2023, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Castratio

2023
Clinical Outcomes of First Subsequent Therapies After Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone for High-Risk Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in the LATITUDE Study.
    Targeted oncology, 2023, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Castratio

2023
Clinical Outcomes of First Subsequent Therapies After Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone for High-Risk Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in the LATITUDE Study.
    Targeted oncology, 2023, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Castratio

2023
A Phase I Study of Capivasertib in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2023, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asthenia; Humans; Male; Phospha

2023
Safety Profile of Ipatasertib Plus Abiraterone vs Placebo Plus Abiraterone in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2023, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Exanthema; Humans; Hyperglycemi

2023
Effect of Prior Local Therapy on Response to First-line Androgen Receptor Axis Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the COU-AA-302 Trial.
    European urology, 2023, Volume: 83, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxe

2023
Niraparib and Abiraterone Acetate for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023, 06-20, Volume: 41, Issue:18

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; H

2023
Niraparib with Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Phase II QUEST Study Results.
    The oncologist, 2023, 05-08, Volume: 28, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prost

2023
Randomized Phase III Study of Enzalutamide Compared With Enzalutamide Plus Abiraterone for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (Alliance A031201 Trial).
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023, 06-20, Volume: 41, Issue:18

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Prednis

2023
Implications of metastatic stage at presentation in docetaxel naïve metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer.
    The Prostate, 2023, Volume: 83, Issue:10

    Topics: Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Progression-Free Survival; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resi

2023
Pembrolizumab Plus Olaparib for Patients With Previously Treated and Biomarker-Unselected Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III KEYLYNK-010 Trial.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023, 08-01, Volume: 41, Issue:22

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Male; Pre

2023
Niraparib plus abiraterone acetate with prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and homologous recombination repair gene alterations: second interim analysis of the randomized phase III MAGNITUDE trial.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2023, Volume: 34, Issue:9

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; H

2023
Randomized Phase II Multicenter Trial of Abiraterone Acetate With or Without Cabazitaxel in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023, Nov-10, Volume: 41, Issue:32

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Humans;

2023
Results of a Real-world Study of Enzalutamide and Abiraterone Acetate With Prednisone Tolerability (REAAcT).
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2019, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Affect; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amnesia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy

2019
Phase 1b trial of docetaxel, prednisone, and pazopanib in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    The Prostate, 2019, Volume: 79, Issue:15

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Maximum To

2019
Cabazitaxel versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2019, 12-26, Volume: 381, Issue:26

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro

2019
Cabazitaxel versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2019, 12-26, Volume: 381, Issue:26

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro

2019
Cabazitaxel versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2019, 12-26, Volume: 381, Issue:26

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro

2019
Cabazitaxel versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2019, 12-26, Volume: 381, Issue:26

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro

2019
Impact of Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone or Enzalutamide on Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Final 12-mo Analysis from the Observational AQUARiUS Study.
    European urology, 2020, Volume: 77, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemoth

2020
Optimal sequencing of enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2, crossover trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2019, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzam

2019
Optimal sequencing of enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2, crossover trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2019, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzam

2019
Optimal sequencing of enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2, crossover trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2019, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzam

2019
Optimal sequencing of enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2, crossover trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2019, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzam

2019
Adjusting Overall Survival Estimates for Treatment Switching in Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Results from the LATITUDE Study.
    Targeted oncology, 2019, Volume: 14, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asia;

2019
A randomized, double-blind, comparison of radium-223 and placebo, in combination with abiraterone acetate and prednisolone, in castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer: subgroup analysis of Japanese patients in the ERA 223 study.
    International journal of clinical oncology, 2020, Volume: 25, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asian

2020
Androgens and Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Docetaxel.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2020, Volume: 18, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgens; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizum

2020
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Antitumor Effect of Apalutamide with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Phase Ib Study.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2020, 07-15, Volume: 26, Issue:14

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cross-

2020
A Phase 2 Trial of Abiraterone Followed by Randomization to Addition of Dasatinib or Sunitinib in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2021, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dasatinib; Humans;

2021
Cabozantinib plus docetaxel and prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    BJU international, 2021, Volume: 127, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Proto

2021
Impact of clinical versus radiographic progression on clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    ESMO open, 2020, Volume: 5, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Propo

2020
Phase Ib trial of reformulated niclosamide with abiraterone/prednisone in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Scientific reports, 2021, 03-18, Volume: 11, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Drug-Relat

2021
A randomized phase IIa study of quantified bone scan response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 dichloride alone or in combination with abiraterone acetate/prednisone or enzalutamide.
    ESMO open, 2021, Volume: 6, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides; Humans; Male; Nitri

2021
Niraparib with androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: safety and pharmacokinetic results from a phase 1b study (BEDIVERE).
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2021, Volume: 88, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Indazo

2021
Niraparib with androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: safety and pharmacokinetic results from a phase 1b study (BEDIVERE).
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2021, Volume: 88, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Indazo

2021
Niraparib with androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: safety and pharmacokinetic results from a phase 1b study (BEDIVERE).
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2021, Volume: 88, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Indazo

2021
Niraparib with androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: safety and pharmacokinetic results from a phase 1b study (BEDIVERE).
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2021, Volume: 88, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Indazo

2021
Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in poor prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2021, Volume: 32, Issue:7

    Topics: Androgen Antagonists; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides; Human

2021
KEYNOTE-921: Phase III study of pembrolizumab plus docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Future oncology (London, England), 2021, Volume: 17, Issue:25

    Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical T

2021
Efficacy and Safety of Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Older Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the CARD Study.
    European urology, 2021, Volume: 80, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides;

2021
Efficacy and Safety of Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Older Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the CARD Study.
    European urology, 2021, Volume: 80, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides;

2021
Efficacy and Safety of Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Older Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the CARD Study.
    European urology, 2021, Volume: 80, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides;

2021
Efficacy and Safety of Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Older Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the CARD Study.
    European urology, 2021, Volume: 80, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides;

2021
Docetaxel and prednisone with or without enzalutamide as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: CHEIRON, a randomised phase II trial.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2021, Volume: 155

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides; Docetaxel; Female; Humans; Male; M

2021
Circulating and Intratumoral Adrenal Androgens Correlate with Response to Abiraterone in Men with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021, 11-01, Volume: 27, Issue:21

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgens; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormo

2021
The Clinical Efficacy of Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Prospective Single-center Study.
    Anticancer research, 2017, Volume: 37, Issue:3

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzamides; Docetaxel; Drug Resistan

2017
A randomised, phase II study of repeated rhenium-188-HEDP combined with docetaxel and prednisone versus docetaxel and prednisone alone in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) metastatic to bone; the Taxium II trial.
    European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017, Volume: 44, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Disease-Fre

2017
High-Dose Abiraterone Acetate in Men With Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2017, Volume: 15, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Androstenes; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Sche

2017
Antitumour Activity and Safety of Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated with Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone for ≥24 weeks in Europe.
    European urology, 2018, Volume: 74, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Ben

2018
The Phase 3 COU-AA-302 Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Men with Chemotherapy-naïve Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Stratified Analysis Based on Pain, Prostate-specific Antigen, and Gleason Score.
    European urology, 2018, Volume: 74, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Huma

2018
Custirsen (OGX-011) combined with cabazitaxel and prednisone versus cabazitaxel and prednisone alone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel (AFFINITY): a randomised, open-label, international, ph
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Dose-Respons

2017
A prospective genome-wide study of prostate cancer metastases reveals association of wnt pathway activation and increased cell cycle proliferation with primary resistance to abiraterone acetate-prednisone.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018, 02-01, Volume: 29, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cell Cycle; Cell Prolifer

2018
Weekly cabazitaxel plus prednisone is effective and less toxic for 'unfit' metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Phase II Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group (SOGUG) trial.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2017, Volume: 87

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Drug

2017
Randomized phase 2 therapeutic equivalence study of abiraterone acetate fine particle formulation vs. originator abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: The STAAR study.
    Urologic oncology, 2018, Volume: 36, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Gastro

2018
eRADicAte: A Prospective Evaluation Combining Radium-223 Dichloride and Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2018, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prednisone; Prospective Stu

2018
A randomized phase 2 study of a HSP27 targeting antisense, apatorsen with prednisone versus prednisone alone, in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.
    Investigational new drugs, 2018, Volume: 36, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endpoint Determination; HSP27 Heat

2018
Targeting Androgen Receptor and DNA Repair in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results From NCI 9012.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 04-01, Volume: 36, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles

2018
Patient-reported outcomes following abiraterone acetate plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic castration-naive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): an international, randomised phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dis

2018
Phase I Trial of the Combination of Docetaxel, Prednisone, and Pasireotide in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2018, Volume: 16, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease Progressi

2018
Prospective International Randomized Phase II Study of Low-Dose Abiraterone With Food Versus Standard Dose Abiraterone In Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 05-10, Volume: 36, Issue:14

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Biomarkers, Tumor; Dehydroepiandrosterone; Dose-Response Relat

2018
The IMAAGEN Study: Effect of Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone on Prostate Specific Antigen and Radiographic Disease Progression in Patients with Nonmetastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    The Journal of urology, 2018, Volume: 200, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone N

2018
[Clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine for castration-resistant prostate cancer].
    Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology, 2017, Volume: 23, Issue:10

    Topics: Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel

2017
Circulating tumour cell increase as a biomarker of disease progression in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with low baseline CTC counts.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018, 07-01, Volume: 29, Issue:7

    Topics: Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Disease Progression;

2018
Phase II pilot study of the prednisone to dexamethasone switch in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with limited progression on abiraterone plus prednisone (SWITCH study).
    British journal of cancer, 2018, Volume: 119, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Dexamethasone; Disease Progre

2018
Impact of Diabetes on the Outcomes of Patients With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Docetaxel: A Pooled Analysis of Three Phase III Studies.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2019, Volume: 17, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Diabetes Mellitus; Docetaxel; Female; Follow-U

2019
Medical resource utilization of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy in metastatic castration-naive prostate cancer: Results from LATITUDE.
    Cancer, 2019, 02-15, Volume: 125, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Bl

2019
Cabozantinib Versus Mitoxantrone-prednisone in Symptomatic Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial with a Primary Pain Endpoint.
    European urology, 2019, Volume: 75, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Analgesics; Anilides; Bone Neoplasms; Cancer Pain; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Hum

2019
Randomised phase II study of second-line olaratumab with mitoxantrone/prednisone versus mitoxantrone/prednisone alone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2019, Volume: 107

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protoco

2019
Health-related Quality of Life for Abiraterone Plus Prednisone Versus Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Results from a Phase II Randomized Trial.
    European urology, 2019, Volume: 75, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides; Hu

2019
Outcome of loco-regional radiotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate.
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2019, Volume: 195, Issue:10

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tum

2019
Addition of radium-223 to abiraterone acetate and prednisone or prednisolone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases (ERA 223): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2019, Volume: 20, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone N

2019
Effect of Chemotherapy With Docetaxel With Androgen Suppression and Radiotherapy for Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer: The Randomized Phase III NRG Oncology RTOG 0521 Trial.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019, 05-10, Volume: 37, Issue:14

    Topics: Aged; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemoradiotherapy; Docet

2019
Pantoprazole Affecting Docetaxel Resistance Pathways via Autophagy (PANDORA): Phase II Trial of High Dose Pantoprazole (Autophagy Inhibitor) with Docetaxel in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC).
    The oncologist, 2019, Volume: 24, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Autophagy; Disease Progress

2019
Risk of development of visceral metastases subsequent to abiraterone vs placebo: An analysis of mode of radiographic progression in COU-AA-302.
    The Prostate, 2019, Volume: 79, Issue:8

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols;

2019
The LACOG-0415 phase II trial: abiraterone acetate and ADT versus apalutamide versus abiraterone acetate and apalutamide in patients with advanced prostate cancer with non-castration testosterone levels.
    BMC cancer, 2019, May-23, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adenocarcinoma; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal;

2019
Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Docetaxel plus Prednisone with or Without Cediranib in Men with Chemotherapy-Naive Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    The oncologist, 2019, Volume: 24, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Humans; Kallikre

2019
Phase II study of satraplatin and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a pharmacogenetic assessment of outcome and toxicity.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2013, Volume: 11, Issue:3

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Fre

2013
Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2013, Volume: 11, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Docetaxel; Humans; Leukocy

2013
Safety of Abiraterone Acetate in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients With Concomitant Cardiovascular Risk Factors.
    American journal of clinical oncology, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Comorb

2015
Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: patient-reported outcome results of a randomised phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2013, Volume: 14, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Activities of Daily Living; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap

2013
Exploratory analysis of the visceral disease subgroup in a phase III study of abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2014, Volume: 17, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal

2014
Efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate in an elderly patient subgroup (aged 75 and older) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel-based chemotherapy.
    European urology, 2014, Volume: 65, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Com

2014
Prognostic model predicting metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer survival in men treated with second-line chemotherapy.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2013, Nov-20, Volume: 105, Issue:22

    Topics: Aged; Alkaline Phosphatase; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Biomar

2013
Abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: U.S. Food and Drug Administration drug approval summary.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013, Dec-15, Volume: 19, Issue:24

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Su

2013
Clinical benefits of non-taxane chemotherapies in unselected patients with symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel: the GETUG-P02 study.
    BJU international, 2015, Volume: 115, Issue:1

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Eto

2015
A randomised phase 2 study combining LY2181308 sodium (survivin antisense oligonucleotide) with first-line docetaxel/prednisone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    European urology, 2014, Volume: 65, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male; Ol

2014
Radiographic progression by Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-2 criteria as an intermediate endpoint for drug development in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    BJU international, 2014, Volume: 114, Issue:6b

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxe

2014
Androgen dynamics and serum PSA in patients treated with abiraterone acetate.
    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2014, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgens; Androstenes; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Kallikreins; Male; Prednis

2014
Updated interim efficacy analysis and long-term safety of abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without prior chemotherapy (COU-AA-302).
    European urology, 2014, Volume: 66, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Che

2014
Prognostic impact of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2014, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alkaline Phosphatase; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2014
Impact of baseline corticosteroids on survival and steroid androgens in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: exploratory analysis from COU-AA-301.
    European urology, 2015, Volume: 67, Issue:5

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic

2015
Phase I/II study of azacitidine, docetaxel, and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Cell Cycle

2015
Phase I/II study of azacitidine, docetaxel, and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Cell Cycle

2015
Phase I/II study of azacitidine, docetaxel, and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Cell Cycle

2015
Phase I/II study of azacitidine, docetaxel, and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Cell Cycle

2015
Phase I/II study of azacitidine, docetaxel, and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Cell Cycle

2015
Phase I/II study of azacitidine, docetaxel, and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Cell Cycle

2015
Phase I/II study of azacitidine, docetaxel, and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Cell Cycle

2015
Phase I/II study of azacitidine, docetaxel, and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Cell Cycle

2015
Phase I/II study of azacitidine, docetaxel, and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azacitidine; Cell Cycle

2015
[Recruiting participants - study of therapy of CRPC].
    Aktuelle Urologie, 2014, Volume: 45, Issue:5

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Androgen Antagonists; Androstenes; Biomarkers, Tumor; Disease Progression; Drug Ther

2014
Bevacizumab and the risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90401 (Alliance).
    Cancer, 2015, Apr-01, Volume: 121, Issue:7

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Co

2015
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: data from two randomized phase III trials.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2015, Volume: 26, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone

2015
Phase 1/2 study of orteronel (TAK-700), an investigational 17,20-lyase inhibitor, with docetaxel-prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Investigational new drugs, 2015, Volume: 33, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dehy

2015
Intermittent Chemotherapy as a Platform for Testing Novel Agents in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium Randomized Phase II Trial of Intermittent Docetaxel With
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015, Volume: 13, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Doce

2015
Improvements in Radiographic Progression-Free Survival Stratified by ERG Gene Status in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Abiraterone Acetate.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015, Apr-01, Volume: 21, Issue:7

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Double-Blind Method; Humans

2015
Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus placebo plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (COU-AA-302): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols;

2015
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone with placebo plus prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that has progressed during or after docetaxel-based therapy:
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2015, Mar-01, Volume: 33, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; D

2015
Radiographic progression-free survival as a response biomarker in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: COU-AA-302 results.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2015, Apr-20, Volume: 33, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor;

2015
A multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing the three-weekly docetaxel regimen plus prednisone versus mitoxantone plus prednisone for Chinese patients with metastatic castration refractory prostate cancer.
    PloS one, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chin

2015
Orteronel plus prednisone in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ELM-PC 4): a double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:3

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asia; Australia; Cytochrome P-

2015
A Randomised Phase II Trial Comparing Docetaxel Plus Prednisone with Docetaxel Plus Prednisone Plus Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Chemotherapy, 2014, Volume: 60, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cyclophosphamide; Docetaxel

2014
Docetaxel and prednisone with or without lenalidomide in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (MAINSAIL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Double-Bl

2015
Comparative effectiveness of mitoxantrone plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel failure.
    The oncologist, 2015, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Drug Resistance,

2015
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Sipuleucel-T with Concurrent versus Sequential Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015, Sep-01, Volume: 21, Issue:17

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antigen-Presenting Cells; Antineoplastic Combined Chem

2015
Phase I/II clinical trial of dendritic-cell based immunotherapy (DCVAC/PCa) combined with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Oncotarget, 2015, Jul-20, Volume: 6, Issue:20

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Metronomic; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylati

2015
A randomised non-comparative phase II trial of cixutumumab (IMC-A12) or ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) plus mitoxantrone and prednisone in men with metastatic docetaxel-pretreated castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2015, Volume: 51, Issue:13

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized;

2015
Food effects on abiraterone pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects and patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015, Volume: 55, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Dietary Fat

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Abiraterone Acetate in Elderly (75 Years or Older) Chemotherapy Naïve Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    The Journal of urology, 2015, Volume: 194, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Dis

2015
Phase II Trial of Carboplatin, Everolimus, and Prednisone in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Pretreated With Docetaxel Chemotherapy: A Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial Consortium Study.
    Urology, 2015, Volume: 86, Issue:6

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Disease Progressi

2015
Prior Endocrine Therapy Impact on Abiraterone Acetate Clinical Efficacy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post-hoc Analysis of Randomised Phase 3 Studies.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 69, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Receptor Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic

2016
Does Gleason score at initial diagnosis predict efficacy of abiraterone acetate therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer? An analysis of abiraterone acetate phase III trials.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016, Volume: 27, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenols; Antineoplastic Combined Chemother

2016
Does Gleason score at initial diagnosis predict efficacy of abiraterone acetate therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer? An analysis of abiraterone acetate phase III trials.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016, Volume: 27, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenols; Antineoplastic Combined Chemother

2016
Does Gleason score at initial diagnosis predict efficacy of abiraterone acetate therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer? An analysis of abiraterone acetate phase III trials.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016, Volume: 27, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenols; Antineoplastic Combined Chemother

2016
Does Gleason score at initial diagnosis predict efficacy of abiraterone acetate therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer? An analysis of abiraterone acetate phase III trials.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016, Volume: 27, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenols; Antineoplastic Combined Chemother

2016
A prognostic index model for predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate after docetaxel.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016, Volume: 27, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-

2016
A prognostic index model for predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate after docetaxel.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016, Volume: 27, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-

2016
A prognostic index model for predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate after docetaxel.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016, Volume: 27, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-

2016
A prognostic index model for predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate after docetaxel.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016, Volume: 27, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-

2016
The New Combination Docetaxel, Prednisone and Curcumin in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Phase II Study.
    Oncology, 2016, Volume: 90, Issue:2

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chromograni

2016
Phase II trial of docetaxel, bevacizumab, lenalidomide and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    BJU international, 2016, Volume: 118, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Bevacizumab; Huma

2016
Severe neutropenia during cabazitaxel treatment is associated with survival benefit in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A post-hoc analysis of the TROPIC phase III trial.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2016, Volume: 56

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Granulocyte Colony

2016
Phase 1b Study of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone and Docetaxel in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Di

2016
Abiraterone acetate for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel failure: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 bridging study.
    International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2016, Volume: 23, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; China; D

2016
Pharmacogenetic Discovery in CALGB (Alliance) 90401 and Mechanistic Validation of a VAC14 Polymorphism that Increases Risk of Docetaxel-Induced Neuropathy.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2016, Oct-01, Volume: 22, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab

2016
Modeling the Relationship Between Exposure to Abiraterone and Prostate-Specific Antigen Dynamics in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2017, Volume: 56, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Area Under Curve; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; M

2017
Phase III Study of Cabozantinib in Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: COMET-1.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016, 09-01, Volume: 34, Issue:25

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Disease-Free Sur

2016
Phase III Study of Cabozantinib in Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: COMET-1.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016, 09-01, Volume: 34, Issue:25

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Disease-Free Sur

2016
Phase III Study of Cabozantinib in Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: COMET-1.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016, 09-01, Volume: 34, Issue:25

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Disease-Free Sur

2016
Phase III Study of Cabozantinib in Previously Treated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: COMET-1.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016, 09-01, Volume: 34, Issue:25

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Disease-Free Sur

2016
Circulating Tumor Cells in a Phase 3 Study of Docetaxel and Prednisone with or without Lenalidomide in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
    European urology, 2017, Volume: 71, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Humans; Lenalidomide; Male; Neoplas

2017
Association of Survival Benefit With Docetaxel in Prostate Cancer and Total Number of Cycles Administered: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Mainsail Study.
    JAMA oncology, 2017, Jan-01, Volume: 3, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Surviva

2017
Phase II Trial of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Black Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
    The oncologist, 2016, Volume: 21, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Black People; Humans; Mal

2016
Prediction of overall survival for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: development of a prognostic model through a crowdsourced challenge with open clinical trial data.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bayes Theorem; Crowdsourcin

2017
A Phase I/II Study of the Investigational Drug Alisertib in Combination With Abiraterone and Prednisone for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Progressing on Abiraterone.
    The oncologist, 2016, Volume: 21, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aurora Kinase

2016
Custirsen in combination with docetaxel and prednisone for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (SYNERGY trial): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Dise

2017
Efficacy of docetaxel-based chemotherapy following ketoconazole in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: implications for prior therapy in clinical trials.
    Urologic oncology, 2013, Volume: 31, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Gossypol; Hu

2013
[Docetaxel plus prednisone versus mitoxantrone plus prednisone as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer: long-term effects and safety].
    Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery], 2012, Volume: 50, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mitoxant

2012

Other Studies

144 other studies available for prednisone and Androgen-Independent Prostatic Cancer

ArticleYear
Real-world outcomes of second novel hormonal therapy or radium-223 following first novel hormonal therapy for mCRPC.
    Future oncology (London, England), 2022, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzamides; Bone Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle Aged;

2022
Prostate Cancer Metastasis to the Pituitary Gland Manifesting as Corticosteroid Withdrawal, and the Impact of the Switch from Prednisone to Dexamethasone on Survival Time.
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021, 10-24, Volume: 28, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dexame

2021
Synthesis and characterization of epoxide impurities of abiraterone acetate.
    Steroids, 2022, Volume: 180

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Epoxy Compounds; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neop

2022
First-line treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: the real-world Italian cohort of the Prostate Cancer Registry.
    Tumori, 2023, Volume: 109, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Pred

2023
Real-world experience of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: long-term results of the prospective ABItude study.
    ESMO open, 2022, Volume: 7, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Pain; Predn

2022
Ascending Flaccid Paralysis Secondary to Hypokalemia in A Cancer Patient using Abiraterone - A Case Report.
    Current drug safety, 2023, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Hypokalemia; Male; Para

2023
Should LHRH therapy be continued in patients receiving abiraterone acetate?
    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2022, Volume: 25, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2022
Molecular Profile Changes in Patients with Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer Pre- and Post-Abiraterone/Prednisone Treatment.
    Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2022, 12-02, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aurora Kinase A; Humans; Male;

2022
Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate With Prednisone in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in Real-life Clinical Practice: A Long-term Single Institution Experience.
    Anticancer research, 2023, Volume: 43, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Prednis

2023
Circulating tumor cell quantification during abiraterone plus prednisone therapy may estimate survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.
    International urology and nephrology, 2023, Volume: 55, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Ma

2023
Clinical impact of volume of disease and time of metastatic disease presentation on patients receiving enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone as first-line therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Journal of translational medicine, 2023, 02-03, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Prednis

2023
Quality of life outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and pretreatment prognostic score.
    The Prostate, 2023, Volume: 83, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; P

2023
Visceral Metastasis Predicts Response to New Hormonal Agents in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.
    The oncologist, 2023, 07-05, Volume: 28, Issue:7

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined

2023
Re: Niraparib and Abiraterone Acetate for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
    European urology, 2023, Volume: 84, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Indazoles; Male; Piperi

2023
[New drug approval: Fixed dose association of niraparib and abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer with BRCA1/2 mutation].
    Bulletin du cancer, 2023, Volume: 110, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; D

2023
Abiraterone acetate and prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a real-world retrospective study in China.
    Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023, Volume: 14

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adolescent; Adult; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms,

2023
Real-world survival outcome comparing abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and enzalutamide for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Cancer medicine, 2023, Volume: 12, Issue:19

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Phenylthiohydanto

2023
Combination therapy with olaparib and abiraterone acetate for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2023, Volume: 24, Issue:10

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Phthalazines; Pip

2023
Considering bone health in the treatment of prostate cancer bone metastasis based on the results of the ERA-223 trial.
    International journal of clinical oncology, 2019, Volume: 24, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Bone Density; Bone Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Male; Prednisolone;

2019
Combination treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: can we safely boost efficacy by adding radium-223?
    Cancer biology & therapy, 2020, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Ma

2020
Abiraterone experience in a patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer on hemodialysis.
    Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2019, Volume: 25, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostat

2019
Re: Safety and Outcomes of New Generation Hormone-Therapy in Elderly Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients in the Real World.
    The Journal of urology, 2020, Volume: 203, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms,

2020
Real-world outcome with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in Asian men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: The Singapore experience.
    Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2020, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Drug Therapy, Combina

2020
Overall and progression-free survival with cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in routine clinical practice: the FUJI cohort.
    British journal of cancer, 2019, Volume: 121, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides; Bone Neoplasms; Docet

2019
Sequence of AR inhibitors affects outcome.
    Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2020, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Benzamides; Cross-Over Studies; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Pr

2020
Androgen receptor-targeted agents in the management of advanced prostate cancer.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2019, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Benzamides; Cross-Over Studies; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Pr

2019
Economic Outcomes in Patients with Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone.
    Advances in therapy, 2020, Volume: 37, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Benzamides; Cohort S

2020
Liver tests increase on abiraterone acetate in men with metastatic prostate cancer: Natural history, management and outcome.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2020, Volume: 129

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine Transaminase; Antineopla

2020
Combination of statin/vitamin D and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): a post hoc analysis of two randomized clinical trials.
    Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020, Volume: 22, Issue:11

    Topics: Androstenes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Male

2020
Plasma cell-free DNA-based predictors of response to abiraterone acetate/prednisone and prognostic factors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2020, Volume: 23, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell-Free Nucleic Aci

2020
[Early- vs. late-onset treatment using abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in chemo-naïve, asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with metastatic CRPC after androgen deprivation therapy].
    Aktuelle Urologie, 2020, Volume: 51, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2020
Re: Nobuaki Matsubara, Kim N. Chi, Mustafa Özgüroğlu, et al. Correlation of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics with Overall Survival and Radiological Progression-free Survival in Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Abiraterone Ace
    European urology, 2020, Volume: 78, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Castration; Humans; Kinetics; Male; Prednisone

2020
Concurrent or layered treatment with radium-223 and enzalutamide or abiraterone/prednisone: real-world clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2020, Volume: 23, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzami

2020
Predictors of resistance to abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in post-docetaxel setting: a single-center cohort study.
    Anti-cancer drugs, 2020, Volume: 31, Issue:7

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined

2020
[Sequential therapy for asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer].
    Aktuelle Urologie, 2020, Volume: 51, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant;

2020
Identifying Prostate Surface Antigen Patterns of Change in Patients with Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Abiraterone and Prednisone.
    Targeted oncology, 2020, Volume: 15, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Androstenes; Antigens, Surface; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male;

2020
Clinical Experience of Steroid Switch from Prednisone to Dexamethasone in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Abiraterone Acetate.
    Urologia internationalis, 2021, Volume: 105, Issue:5-6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Agents; Dexamethasone; Drug Substitution; Glucocorticoids; Human

2021
Blood-based gene expression signature associated with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer patient response to abiraterone plus prednisone or enzalutamide.
    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2021, Volume: 24, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Androstenes; Benzamides; Biomarkers, Tumor; Bone Neop

2021
Efficacy and safety of docetaxel and prednisolone chemotherapy in very elderly men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in real world: a single institute experience.
    Annals of palliative medicine, 2021, Volume: 10, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; China; Docetaxel; Humans; M

2021
Appropriate Number of Docetaxel Cycles in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Considering Peripheral Neuropathy and Oncological Control.
    Chemotherapy, 2020, Volume: 65, Issue:5-6

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dexamethasone; Docetaxel; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Male; Middl

2020
Medication patterns of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or enzalutamide and PSA progression in veterans with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2021, Volume: 37, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides; Humans; Male; Nitri

2021
Liquid biopsy reveals KLK3 mRNA as a prognostic marker for progression free survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing first-line abiraterone acetate and prednisone treatment.
    Molecular oncology, 2021, Volume: 15, Issue:9

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Case-Control Studies; Di

2021
Real-World Safety and Efficacy Outcomes with Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone or Prednisolone as the First- or Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Data from the Prostate Cancer Registry.
    Targeted oncology, 2021, Volume: 16, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Regi

2021
Prednisone reduction for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with recurrent pulmonary tuberculosis: Case report.
    Medicine, 2021, Apr-16, Volume: 100, Issue:15

    Topics: Aged; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Medical Illustration; Mycobacterium; Prednisone; Prostatic Neop

2021
A prospective trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in Black and White men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.
    Cancer, 2021, 08-15, Volume: 127, Issue:16

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Humans;

2021
Multiple Docetaxel Retreatments Without Prednisone for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in the Docetaxel-Only Era: Effects on PSA Kinetics and Survival.
    Advances in therapy, 2021, Volume: 38, Issue:7

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Humans; Kinetics; Male; Prednisone; Prost

2021
Plasma androgen receptor and response to adapted and standard docetaxel regimen in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A multicenter biomarker study.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2021, Volume: 152

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; D

2021
Should Patients with High-risk Localised or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Receive Abiraterone Acetate in Addition to Androgen Deprivation Therapy? Update on a Planned Analysis of the STAMPEDE Trial.
    European urology, 2021, Volume: 80, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgen Antagonists; Androgens; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms,

2021
Treatment of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone and Corresponding Survival Prognostic Factors.
    Anticancer research, 2021, Volume: 41, Issue:8

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate;

2021
Association of Concomitant Bone Resorption Inhibitors With Overall Survival Among Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Bone Metastases Receiving Abiraterone Acetate With Prednisone as First-Line Therapy.
    JAMA network open, 2021, 07-01, Volume: 4, Issue:7

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Coho

2021
Corticosteroid switch from prednisone to dexamethasone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with biochemical progression on abiraterone acetate plus prednisone.
    BMC cancer, 2021, Aug-13, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomar

2021
The effect of chemotherapy on the exposure-response relation of abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022, Volume: 88, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Pred

2022
Clinical Outcomes from Androgen Signaling-directed Therapy after Treatment with Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of COU-AA-302.
    European urology, 2017, Volume: 72, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2017
Prostate cancer: Custirsen fails to improve outcomes.
    Nature reviews. Urology, 2017, Volume: 14, Issue:6

    Topics: Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant;

2017
Comment on: "Abiraterone Acetate for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of an NICE Single Technology Appraisal".
    PharmacoEconomics, 2017, Volume: 35, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castratio

2017
Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding "Abiraterone Acetate for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal".
    PharmacoEconomics, 2017, Volume: 35, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castratio

2017
Phase II study of cabazitaxel with or without abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer after prior docetaxel and abiraterone acetate.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017, 03-01, Volume: 28, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostatic Neoplasms,

2017
Validation of the Association of RECIST Changes With Survival in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated on SWOG Study S0421.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2017, Volume: 15, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Controlle

2017
Commentary on: Abiraterone Plus Prednisolone in Metastatic, Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer.
    Urology, 2017, Volume: 109

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Castration; Diseas

2017
Treatment with abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients progressing after docetaxel: a retrospective study.
    Anti-cancer drugs, 2017, Volume: 28, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Hum

2017
Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Multikinase Regorafenib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Oncology, 2017, Volume: 93, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocol

2017
Antitumor Activity and Safety of Enzalutamide After Abiraterone Acetate: Seeking the Optimal Treatment Sequence for Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients.
    European urology, 2018, Volume: 74, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Benzamides; Europe; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Prednisone; Pr

2018
Customizing Daily Management of Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer: Waiting for the Next Step.
    European urology, 2018, Volume: 74, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Grading; Pain; Prednisone; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Pr

2018
Immune Analysis of Radium-223 in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2018, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Neoplasms; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Hu

2018
Relationship between patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: post hoc analysis of COU-AA-301 and COU-AA-302.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018, 02-01, Volume: 29, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials, Phase II

2018
Prostate cancers that 'Wnt' respond to abiraterone.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018, 02-01, Volume: 29, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Cell Cycle; Cell Proliferation; Genome-Wide Association Study; Hum

2018
The Clinical Efficacy of Radium-223 for Bone Metastasis in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Italian Clinical Experience.
    Oncology, 2018, Volume: 94, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Docetaxel; Humans; Italy; Male; Midd

2018
Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts the combined clinical outcome after sequential therapy with abiraterone and docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.
    The Prostate, 2018, Volume: 78, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers; Docetaxel; Humans; Ma

2018
Considering quantity and quality of life in metastatic castration-naive prostate cancer.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Humans; Male; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasm

2018
Abiraterone is effective and should be considered for the treatment of metastatic castrate-naïve prostate cancer.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Docetaxel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hu

2018
Germline Variant in HSD3B1 (1245 A > C) and Response to Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone in Men With New-Onset Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2018, Volume: 16, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Germ-Line Mutation; Human

2018
Long-term abiraterone withdrawal syndrome.
    Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2018, Volume: 43, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Predni

2018
Editorial Comment.
    The Journal of urology, 2018, Volume: 200, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Disease Progression; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prost

2018
Editorial Comment.
    The Journal of urology, 2018, Volume: 200, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Disease Progression; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prost

2018
Oncological Outcome of Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy for Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 2016, Volume: 99, Issue:12

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Drug Therapy, Combination; H

2016
Capitalizing on competition: An evolutionary model of competitive release in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treatment.
    Journal of theoretical biology, 2018, 10-14, Volume: 455

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Mitoxantrone; Models, Biolo

2018
Switch from abiraterone plus prednisone to abiraterone plus dexamethasone at asymptomatic PSA progression in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    BJU international, 2019, Volume: 123, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asymptomatic D

2019
Evaluation of Response to Enzalutamide Consecutively After Abiraterone Acetate/Prednisone Failure in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2018, Volume: 16, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzamides;

2018
Lessons from the SWITCH trial: changing glucocorticoids in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
    British journal of cancer, 2018, Volume: 119, Issue:9

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dexamethasone; Glu

2018
Corticosteroid switch in heavily pre-treated castration-resistant prostate cancer patients progressed on abiraterone acetate plus prednisone.
    Investigational new drugs, 2018, Volume: 36, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemo

2018
Fatigue, treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life among patients receiving novel drugs suppressing androgen signalling for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.
    European journal of cancer care, 2019, Volume: 28, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemothera

2019
Abiraterone acetate for chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a single-centre prospective study of efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors.
    BMC urology, 2018, Dec-03, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Co

2018
Germline Variant in
    Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2019, Volume: 18, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cell Line, Tumor; Disease

2019
Neuroendocrine differentiation markers guide treatment sequence selection in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    The Prostate, 2019, Volume: 79, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antigens, Differentiation; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined

2019
Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone for the Management of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) without prior use of chemotherapy: report from a large, international, real-world retrospective cohort study.
    BMC cancer, 2019, Jan-14, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Comorb

2019
Hard Problems Need "Soft" Science: Integrating Quality of Life into Treatment Decision Making.
    European urology, 2019, Volume: 75, Issue:6

    Topics: Androstenes; Benzamides; Decision Making; Humans; Male; Nitriles; Phenylthiohydantoin; Prednisone; P

2019
A DREAM Challenge to Build Prediction Models for Short-Term Discontinuation of Docetaxel in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2017, Volume: 1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemother

2017
Higher Risk of Fragility Fractures in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Combined Radium-223 and Abiraterone: Prednisone May Be the Culprit.
    European urology, 2019, Volume: 75, Issue:6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Fractures, Bone; H

2019
Combination therapies in prostate cancer: proceed with caution.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2019, Volume: 20, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Male; Prednisolone; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasm

2019
LC-MS/MS assay for the quantification of testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione, cortisol and prednisone in plasma from castrated prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide.
    Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2019, Jun-05, Volume: 170

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenedione; Benzamides; Chromatography, Liquid; Dihydrotestosterone; Human

2019
Early use of abiraterone and radium-223 in metastatic prostate cancer.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2019, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Male; Prednisolone; Prednisone; Prost

2019
Early use of abiraterone and radium-223 in metastatic prostate cancer.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2019, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androstenes; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Male; Prednisolone; Prednisone; Prost

2019
Inter- and intra-patient variability in pharmacokinetics of abiraterone acetate in metastatic prostate cancer.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2019, Volume: 84, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot

2019
AKR1C3 expression in primary lesion rebiopsy at the time of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is strongly associated with poor efficacy of abiraterone as a first-line therapy.
    The Prostate, 2019, Volume: 79, Issue:13

    Topics: Aged; Aldo-Keto Reductase Family 1 Member C3; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot

2019
Re: Addition of Radium-223 to Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone or Prednisolone in Patients with Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer and Bone Metastases (ERA 223): A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Trial.
    European urology, 2019, Volume: 76, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Bone Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Male; Prednisolone; Prednisone; Pr

2019
Efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone vs. cabazitaxel as a subsequent treatment after first-line docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from a prospective observational study (CAPRO).
    BMC cancer, 2019, Aug-05, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adenocarcinoma; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Antineoplastic Ag

2019
Analysis of docetaxel therapy in elderly (≥70 years) castration resistant prostate cancer patients enrolled in the Netherlands Prostate Study.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2013, Volume: 49, Issue:15

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trial

2013
Major response to cyclophosphamide and prednisone in recurrent castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2013, Volume: 11, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Cyclophosphamide; Docetaxel; Hum

2013
Biochemical and objective response to abiraterone acetate withdrawal: incidence and clinical relevance of a new scenario for castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Urology, 2013, Volume: 82, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Androgen Antagonists; Androstadienes; Disease Progression; Docetaxel; Fol

2013
Changes in fPSA level could discriminate tPSA flare-up from tPSA progression in patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer during the initial phase of docetaxel-based chemotherapy.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2013, Volume: 72, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Comb

2013
Translating clinical trials to clinical practice: outcomes of men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel and prednisone in and out of clinical trials.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2013, Volume: 24, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials as T

2013
Prostate cancer: patient-reported outcomes of first-line abiraterone therapy.
    Nature reviews. Urology, 2013, Volume: 10, Issue:11

    Topics: Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic

2013
Abiraterone in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.
    Anti-cancer drugs, 2014, Volume: 25, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Androstenols; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Ther

2014
Clinical variables associated with PSA response to abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2014, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Androstadienes; Biomarkers, Tumo

2014
Safety of cabazitaxel in senior adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of the European compassionate-use programme.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2014, Volume: 50, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Compassionate Use T

2014
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts PSA response, but not outcomes in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel.
    International urology and nephrology, 2014, Volume: 46, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Humans; Lymp

2014
Adherence patterns for abiraterone acetate and concomitant prednisone use in patients with prostate cancer.
    Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2014, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic C

2014
Risk factors for febrile neutropenia in patients receiving docetaxel chemotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014, Volume: 22, Issue:12

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutrop

2014
Corticosteroids and prostate cancer: friend or foe?
    European urology, 2015, Volume: 67, Issue:5

    Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male;

2015
Tumour responses following a steroid switch from prednisone to dexamethasone in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients progressing on abiraterone.
    British journal of cancer, 2014, Dec-09, Volume: 111, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Dexamethasone; Humans; Male; Middle

2014
Metronomic oral cyclophosphamide plus prednisone in docetaxel-pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2015, Volume: 32, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Metronomic; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Cyclophosphamide; Diseas

2015
Abiraterone's efficacy confirmed; time to aim higher.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Bone Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Ne

2015
Urological cancer: abiraterone treatment improves overall survival in patients with mCRPC.
    Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2015, Volume: 12, Issue:3

    Topics: Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Bone Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Ne

2015
Exploring the Clinical Benefit of Docetaxel or Enzalutamide After Disease Progression During Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone Treatment in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2015, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzamides; Diseas

2015
The MAINSAIL trial: an expected failure.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castr

2015
In reply.
    The oncologist, 2015, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castrat

2015
Is dexamethasone a better partner for abiraterone than prednisolone?
    The oncologist, 2015, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castrat

2015
Urological cancer: Is docetaxel the 'black widow' of mCRPC drugs?
    Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2015, Volume: 12, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castr

2015
Reduced Dose of Abiraterone Acetate with Concomitant Low-dose Prednisone in the Treatment of ≥ 85 Year-old Patients with Advanced Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Anticancer research, 2015, Volume: 35, Issue:5

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols;

2015
Impact of bone-targeted therapies in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate: post hoc analysis of study COU-AA-302.
    European urology, 2015, Volume: 68, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro

2015
Impact of bone-targeted therapies in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate: post hoc analysis of study COU-AA-302.
    European urology, 2015, Volume: 68, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro

2015
Impact of bone-targeted therapies in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate: post hoc analysis of study COU-AA-302.
    European urology, 2015, Volume: 68, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro

2015
Impact of bone-targeted therapies in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate: post hoc analysis of study COU-AA-302.
    European urology, 2015, Volume: 68, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro

2015
[Predictor analysis of PSA response of docetaxel combined with prednisone in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer].
    Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2015, Aug-18, Volume: 47, Issue:4

    Topics: Disease Progression; Docetaxel; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Neoplasm Grading; Prednisone; Pr

2015
Combination of circulating tumor cell enumeration and tumor marker detection in predicting prognosis and treatment effect in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Oncotarget, 2015, Dec-08, Volume: 6, Issue:39

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Cou

2015
Ureteral Metastasis: Uncommon Manifestation in Prostate Cancer.
    Anticancer research, 2015, Volume: 35, Issue:11

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Humans; Male;

2015
Abiraterone-induced rhabdomyolysis: A case report.
    Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2017, Volume: 23, Issue:2

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemothera

2017
The influence of prednisone on the efficacy of docetaxel in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2016, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free S

2016
Low Incidence of Corticosteroid-associated Adverse Events on Long-term Exposure to Low-dose Prednisone Given with Abiraterone Acetate to Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols;

2016
Prednisone Use in Conjunction with Abiraterone Acetate: Is Patient Safety a Concern with Long-term Steroid Exposure?
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:3

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2016
Cost per median overall survival month associated with abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide for treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Journal of medical economics, 2016, Volume: 19, Issue:8

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzamides; Clinical Tri

2016
Re: Karim Fizazi, Kim N. Chi, Johann S. de Bono, et al. Low Incidence of Corticosteroid-associated Adverse Events on Long-term Exposure to Low-dose Prednisone Given with Abiraterone Acetate to Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Humans; Incidence; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic N

2016
Reply to Giandomenico Roviello, Alberto Bottini, and Daniele Generali's Letter to the Editor re: Karim Fizazi, Kim N. Chi, Johann S. de Bono, et al. Low Incidence of Corticosteroid-associated Adverse Events on Long-term Exposure to Low-dose Prednisone Giv
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Humans; Incidence; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic N

2016
Decline in Circulating Tumor Cell Count and Treatment Outcome in Advanced Prostate Cancer.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Androstenes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cell Count; Clinical Trials as Topic; H

2016
Subsequent Chemotherapy and Treatment Patterns After Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of COU-AA-302.
    European urology, 2017, Volume: 71, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplas

2017
Subsequent Chemotherapy and Treatment Patterns After Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of COU-AA-302.
    European urology, 2017, Volume: 71, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplas

2017
Subsequent Chemotherapy and Treatment Patterns After Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of COU-AA-302.
    European urology, 2017, Volume: 71, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplas

2017
Subsequent Chemotherapy and Treatment Patterns After Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of COU-AA-302.
    European urology, 2017, Volume: 71, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplas

2017
Common Genetic Variation in CYP17A1 and Response to Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    International journal of molecular sciences, 2016, Jul-09, Volume: 17, Issue:7

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Alleles; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease Progression; Genotype; Humans; Ka

2016
Re: Johann S. de Bono, Matthew R. Smith, Fred Saad, et al. Subsequent Chemotherapy and Treatment Patterns After Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of COU-AA-302. Eur Urol. In press. http
    European urology, 2017, Volume: 71, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant

2017
Number needed to treat and associated incremental costs of treatment with enzalutamide versus abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Journal of medical economics, 2017, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined

2017
Impact of single-agent daily prednisone on outcomes in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2017, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Est

2017
Re: Johann S. de Bono, Matthew R. Smith, Fred Saad, et al. Subsequent Chemotherapy and Treatment Patterns After Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of COU-AA-302. Eur Urol. In press. http
    European urology, 2017, Volume: 71, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant

2017
Targeting of CYP17A1 Lyase by VT-464 Inhibits Adrenal and Intratumoral Androgen Biosynthesis and Tumor Growth of Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Scientific reports, 2016, 10-17, Volume: 6

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Androgens; Animals; Biopsy; Cell Line, Tumor; Dehydroepiandrosterone; Humans; H

2016
Reply to Robert J. van Soest and Ronald de Wit's Letter to the Editor re: Johann S. de Bono, Matthew R. Smith, Fred Saad, et al. Subsequent Chemotherapy and Treatment Patterns After Abiraterone Acetate in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Pros
    European urology, 2017, Volume: 71, Issue:1

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prostatic Neoplasms; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-

2017
Estimation of tumour regression and growth rates during treatment in patients with advanced prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Case-Control Studies; Clinical Tr

2017
Efficacy of Eplerenone in the Management of Mineralocorticoid Excess in Men With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Abiraterone Without Prednisone.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2017, Volume: 15, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Eplerenone; Humans; Male;

2017
Prognostic factors of first-line docetaxel treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer: roles of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients from Northwestern China.
    International urology and nephrology, 2017, Volume: 49, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pr

2017
Which Factors Predict Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Abiraterone Acetate Post-Docetaxel?
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2017, Volume: 15, Issue:4

    Topics: Abiraterone Acetate; Aged; Docetaxel; Humans; Male; Prednisone; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Mode

2017
Safety and efficacy of maintenance therapy with a nonspecific cytochrome P17 inhibitor (CYP17i) after response/stabilization to docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2013, Volume: 11, Issue:2

    Topics: 14-alpha Demethylase Inhibitors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Proto

2013