prasugrel-hydrochloride and Stroke

Effective platelet inhibition prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces the risk of ischemic complications. Newer P2Y12 inhibitors are preferred agents over clopidogrel for patients presenting with the acute coronary syndrome. However, the comparative efficacy and safety of them over clopidogrel in elective PCI is unclear. We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of loading strategies of P2Y12 inhibitors in patients undergoing elective PCI.. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) up to June 2021 to compare the safety and effectiveness of different loading strategies of P2Y12 inhibitors before elective PCI. The endpoints of interest were overall mortality, rates of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, revascularization, and major bleeding. Random effects model using the frequentist approach was used to perform a network meta-analysis using R software.. Five trials with a total of 5194 patients were included in our analysis. For ischemic outcomes, including MI, stroke, and revascularization, prasugrel had the most favorable trend. However, clopidogrel had the highest probability of being most effective for major bleeding and all-cause mortality. None of these trends was statistically significant due to lack of power for each outcome.. Although prasugrel and ticagrelor are known as more potent antiplatelet agents, their effects in preventing MI and stroke are marginal and do not translate into improved overall mortality and bleeding compared with clopidogrel.

Topics: Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke

For acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the choice of the duration and kind of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) offering the most accurate balance between ischemic and bleeding risk remains unknown.. A network meta-analysis was performed including all Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing different DAPT regimens and duration in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Trial-defined MACE and major bleedings were the primary endpoints. Stroke, stent thrombosis (ST), all-cause and cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) represented secondary endpoints.. 13 RCTs encompassing 46145 patients were included. Mean age was 62 (61-64) years old, 42% being admitted with STEMI, 33% with NSTEMI and 25% with UA. The competitive arms were: clopidogrel and aspirin for 12 months (6 arms/18183 patients), clopidogrel and aspirin for 6 months (4/3329), clopidogrel and aspirin >12 months (3/2238), ticagrelor and aspirin for 12 months (6/12942) and prasugrel and aspirin for 12 months (3/9453). Trial-defined MACE and major bleedings, stroke and death were similar among the different arms. DAPT with prasugrel and aspirin for 12 months reduced MI compared to aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54.0.94) and reduced the risk of ST compared to ticagrelor (OR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.90). Both prasugrel and ticagrelor reduced ST as compared to clopidogrel and aspirin for 12 months.. Different DAPT strategies yield similar risk of MACE, major bleeding, death and stroke in ACS patients. Prasugrel and aspirin for 12 months proved to be the most effective strategy regarding ST and MI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Limited data comparing prasugrel and ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome are available. Online databases, including MEDLINE and Cochrane Central, were queried to compare these drugs. The primary outcomes of this meta-analysis are myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, noncardiovascular mortality, stent thrombosis, and stroke. The secondary outcome is major bleeding. A total of 9 studies, including 94,590 patients (prasugrel group = 32,759; ticagrelor group = 61,831), were included in this meta-analysis. The overall mean age was 62.73 years, whereas the mean age for the ticagrelor and prasugrel groups was 63.80 and 61.65 years, respectively. Prasugrel is equally effective as compared with ticagrelor in preventing MI. There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding all-cause mortality, stent thrombosis, stroke, or major bleeding. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, prasugrel is equally effective when compared with ticagrelor in preventing MI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Hemorrhage; Humans; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Considering that there is no definite conclusion on the efficacy and safety of switching from potent P2Y 12 inhibitors to clopidogrel, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and compared the efficacy and safety of de-escalation or not of antiplatelet therapy. The relevant randomized controlled trials were included by searching several databases. Net adverse clinical events were identified as the composite end point, which was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, stroke, and bleeding at 12 months after acute coronary syndromes. The efficacy end points were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, stroke, all-cause death, and stent thrombosis. Bleeding was designed as the safety end point. The risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals of end point events were calculated by the fixed-effects model. Six randomized controlled trials with 7627 patients met inclusion criteria. There were significant differences in the risk of net adverse clinical events (RR, 0.67, CI, 0.58-0.78, P < 0.00001) and bleeding end point (0.61, 0.52-0.71, P < 0.00001) between the 2 groups. However, there were no significant differences in the risk of all efficacy end points. In general, the strategy of de-escalation from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel can reduce the incidence of net adverse clinical events and bleeding events in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for reducing ischemic events is greatest in the early period of acute coronary syndrome, and recent randomized controlled trials have investigated the unguided de-escalation strategy of changing potent P2Y. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched for articles published from database inception to September 10, 2021. Randomized controlled trials investigating DAPT using clopidogrel, low-dose prasugrel, standard-dose prasugrel, ticagrelor, unguided de-escalation strategy, and guided selection strategy for patients with acute coronary syndrome were included. Hazard ratios and relative risk estimates were extracted from each study. The estimates were pooled using a random-effects network meta-analysis. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety outcome was major or minor bleeding. Secondary outcomes were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding.. This study included 19 randomized controlled trials with 69 746 patients. Compared with guided selection of DAPT, unguided de-escalation of DAPT was associated with a decreased risk of the primary safety outcome (hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.33-0.72]) without increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.53-1.28]) or any secondary outcomes. The results were similar when the guided selection strategy was divided into platelet function-guided and genotype-guided strategies.. Compared with guided selection of DAPT, unguided de-escalation of DAPT decreased bleeding without increasing ischemic events in patients after acute coronary syndrome. If a strategy of de-escalation is chosen, these findings do not support the routine use of personalized guiding tests.. URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42021273082.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Network Meta-Analysis; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The role of P2Y12 inhibition in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been well described in literature. However, the agent of choice is less clear among elderly patients (>65 years) who are at increased risk of bleeding. This meta-analysis was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of potent P2Y12 inhibitors vs. clopidogrel in this population.. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov (inception through February 25, 2021) were searched for randomized studies comparing potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors to clopidogrel in elderly population presenting with ACS. Study endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE), major bleeding, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and p<0.05 was considered significant. Eight randomized studies with a total 10,081 patients were included in the final analysis. At mean follow up of 26 months, there were no significant differences between potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors and clopidogrel in MACE (HR 0.97, 95% CI [0.82-1.15]; p=0.73), all-cause mortality (HR 0.91, 95% CI [0.75-1.10]; p=1.00), MI (HR 0.95, 95% CI [0.78-1.17]; p=0.64), and stroke (HR 1.24, 95% CI [0.82-1.86]; p=0.31). However, potent oral P2Y. In comparison with clopidogrel, the use of potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors in elderly patients with ACS, is associated with a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular mortality with increased risk of bleeding events and no significant change in MACE outcomes.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Whether guided selection of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is effective in improving outcomes compared with standard antiplatelet therapy remains controversial. We assessed the safety and efficacy of guided versus standard selection of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing PCI.. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, from Aug 20 to Oct 25, 2020, we searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases for randomised controlled trials and observational studies published in any language that compared guided antiplatelet therapy, by means of platelet function testing or genetic testing, versus standard antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing PCI. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, extracted the data, and assessed risk of bias. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were used with random-effects or fixed-effect models according to the estimated heterogeneity among studies assessed by the I. 3656 potentially relevant articles were screened. Our analysis included 11 randomised controlled trials and three observational studies with data for 20 743 patients. Compared with standard therapy, guided selection of antiplatelet therapy was associated with a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0·78, 95% CI 0·63-0·95, p=0·015) and reduced bleeding, although not statistically significant (RR 0·88, 0·77-1·01, p=0·069). Cardiovascular death (RR 0·77, 95% CI 0·59-1·00, p=0·049), myocardial infarction (RR 0·76, 0·60-0·96, p=0·021), stent thrombosis (RR 0·64, 0·46-0·89, p=0·011), stroke (RR 0·66, 0·48-0·91, p=0·010), and minor bleeding (RR 0·78, 0·67-0·92, p=0·0030) were reduced with guided therapy compared with standard therapy. Risks of all-cause death and major bleeding did not differ between guided and standard approaches. Outcomes varied according to the strategy used, with an escalation approach associated with a significant reduction in ischaemic events without any trade-off in safety, and a de-escalation approach associated with a significant reduction in bleeding, without any trade-off in efficacy.. Guided selection of antiplatelet therapy improved both composite and individual efficacy outcomes with a favourable safety profile, driven by a reduction in minor bleeding, supporting the use of platelet function or genetic testing to optimise the choice of agent in patients undergoing PCI.. None.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticagrelor

The optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with a long-term indication for anticoagulation and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to compare randomised trials' outcomes of these patients, focussing on dual versus triple antithrombotic and non vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K oral anticoagulants regimens.. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from January 1980 to March 2019 yielding 309 articles, and after careful screening, five randomized trials totalling 10 643 patients were included for analysis.. Dual antithrombotic regimens were associated with significantly less thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding [odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.71], with no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72-1.22) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.61-1.19). NOAC regimens had significantly lower TIMI major and minor bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78) and intracranial bleeding (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66), with similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.16) and all-cause mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.26).. Dual antithrombotic and NOAC regimens have reduced bleeding without compromising the risk of cardiovascular events or mortality, and should be preferred for patients with ACS or PCI also needing long-term anticoagulation.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Dabigatran; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemorrhage; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Warfarin

Background As reports on the influence of cigarette smoking, an important cardiovascular risk factor, on platelet ADP -P2Y12 receptor inhibitors lack consistency, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of platelet ADP -P2Y12 receptor inhibitors influenced by smoking status. Methods and Results PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE , Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until June 2018. Among the 5076 citations retrieved, 22 studies, including 163 011 patients with or without percutaneous coronary intervention, were included for meta-analysis. Compared with nonsmokers within the first year of follow-up, the reductions of stroke and major adverse cardiovascular event rate were 18% ( P=0.008) and 26% ( P=0.02), respectively. A 20% reduction in stroke ( P=0.02) and a 34% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular event ( P=0.0001) rates were observed in smoking patients without percutaneous coronary intervention. No significant difference was observed in clinical outcome rates among prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel in different smoking status. No significant difference was found in myocardial infarction and bleeding event incidence between current smokers and nonsmokers. Conclusions We concluded that current smokers had a lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and stroke events than did nonsmokers, particularly in the early period (1 year) and among patients without percutaneous coronary intervention. However, because of the lack of original adjusted data, smoker's paradox still needs to consider the impact of age and other covariates. Thus, a differential risk-benefit evaluation should be considered, according to different smoking status, patient conditions, and therapy time points.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cigarette Smoking; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Antiplatelet drugs are widely utilized in the setting of primary stroke prevention, secondary stroke prevention, and neuroendovascular device-related stroke prevention. These medications are effective in general, although significant variability in drug activity exists between patients. Although this variation may be related in part to a multitude of factors, a growing body of evidence suggests that individual genotypes are a main contributor. The PharmGKB database was mined to prioritize genetic variants with potential clinical relevance for response to aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor. Although variants were reported for all drugs, the highest level of evidence was found in cytochrome P450 (CYP450) genotype variation related to clopidogrel response. Individual genetic influences have an impact on the pharmacodynamics of antiplatelet agents. Current clinical practice for stroke prevention is primarily empiric or guided by functional assays; however, there now exists a third potential pathway to base treatment decisions: genotype-guided treatment.

Topics: Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Humans; Pharmacogenomic Variants; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Precision Medicine; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Due to limitations associated with clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), other newer oral anti-platelet agents are being studied. We aimed to systematically carry out a direct comparison of outcomes observed with prasugrel versus clopidogrel following PCI.. Common online searched databases (The Cochrane library, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Google scholar) were used to retrieve relevant publications. Primary endpoints were the adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Secondary outcomes were the bleeding events. This analysis was carried out by RevMan 5.3, whereby odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were considered as the statistical parameters.. Eight studies with a total number of 18,122 participants were included in this direct analysis. Prasugrel was associated with significantly lower adverse cardiovascular outcomes in comparison to clopidogrel following PCI. All-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events were all significantly lower with prasugrel (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.35-0.63; P = 0.0001), (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.57-0.80; P = 0.00001), (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38-0.96; P = 0.03), (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30-0.72; P = 0.0006) and (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.53-0.70; P = 0.00001) respectively. When the bleeding outcomes were analyzed, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) defined major and minor bleeding were not significantly different (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.66-1.27; P = 0.59) and (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.85-1.59; P = 0.35) respectively. However, the combined 'all bleeding events' was significantly higher with prasugrel (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.03-1.70; P = 0.03), but when patients with STEMI and those undergoing elective PCI were separately analyzed, no significant difference in overall bleeding was observed.. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes were significantly lower with the use of prasugrel in comparison to clopidogrel following PCI. In addition, TIMI defined major and minor bleeding were not significantly different showing prasugrel to be well-tolerated following PCI especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Physicians considering prescription of P2Y12-receptor antagonist for long-term (>1 year) protection of patients post-myocardial infarction face the trilemma of selecting between clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor. Differential ischemic benefits derived from relevant trials may assist in tailoring treatment, although the different bleeding definitions applied make any meaningful comparison of each agent's bleeding potential very difficult. Considering the available data and recognizing the significant limitation of observations obtained thus far from subgroup analyses, prasugrel appears to provide higher anti-ischemic protection than clopidogrel. Ticagrelor seems to be an attractive option for patients with renal dysfunction, peripheral arterial disease, or following a brief P2Y12-receptor antagonist interruption, whereas clopidogrel may be advised in the presence of cost and availability issues. As head-to-head comparative trials between P2Y12-receptor antagonists are lacking, selection of a specific agent by the clinician should be made on the basis of critical appraisal of available large clinical datasets.

Topics: Adenosine; Clopidogrel; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

Whether prasugrel can take the place of clopidogrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is not clear. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis for systematically reviewing the evidence on prasugrel in comparison to clopidogrel in patients with ACS.. Relevant prospective and retrospective studies were searched in databases. Six studies were finally included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess all causes of death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, major bleeding, major/minor bleeding, and stent thrombosis (for PCI performed).. Compared with clopidogrel, prasugrel had similar risks of all cause of death (Pooled RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.64-1.06, p=0.14, I2=55%), MI (Pooled RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.71-1.04, p=0.12) and stroke (pooled RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.70-1.10, p=0.25). However, prasugrel was associated with significantly higher risk of both major bleeding (Pooled RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.99-1.44, p=0.06, I2=0%) and the risk of total major and minor bleeding (Pooled RR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.15-1.48, p<0.0001, I2=0%). For the patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), prasugrel was associated with significantly lower risk of stent thrombosis (Pooled RR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.34-0.61, p<0.00001, I2=0%).. Prasugrel has similar effects as clopidogrel in terms of all causes of death, MI, and stroke in ACS patients. For the patients who underwent PCI, prasugrel contributes to lower risk of stent thrombosis. However, prasugrel is associated with significantly higher risk of bleeding. For the patients with active pathological bleeding or a history of stroke and/or TIA, prasugrel should not be recommended.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine

The efficacy and safety of different antiplatelet regimes for prevention of stroke in patients at high risk were investigated in a systematic review and meta-analysis.. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. Twenty-two studies comprising 173 371 patients were included.. In the overall population, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel in comparison to aspirin monotherapy reduced the relative risk of total stroke by 20% (risk ratio [RR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.88; P<0.0001; I(2)=28%) and of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack by 23% (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.85; P<0.0001; I(2)=18%) without increasing the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. In the secondary prevention cohort, DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel also reduced the relative risk of total stroke by 24% as compared with aspirin alone (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.86; P<0.0001; I(2)=0%). DAPT with prasugrel or ticagrelor and aspirin versus DAPT with clopidogrel and aspirin was not associated with a risk reduction of stroke.. DAPT with clopidogrel and aspirin compared with aspirin effectively reduces the risk of total and ischemic stroke in the overall cohort consisting of patients with cardiovascular disease without increase in intracranial hemorrhage, as well as decreases the risk of a recurrent total stroke in patients with a previous stroke/transient ischemic attack. Our meta-analysis suggests that DAPT including low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) should be further investigated as a strategy to reduce recurrent strokes.. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero. Unique identifier: CRD42011001596.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Population; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Purinergic P2; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Vascular Diseases

New P2Y12 inhibitors can be classified as oral (prasugrel and ticagrelor) and intravenous drugs (cangrelor and elinogrel). These P2Y12 inhibitors might be superior to clopidogrel for reducing ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared new oral or intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors with clopidogrel to determine their efficacy and safety in patients.. Twelve randomized, placebo-controlled studies and two subgroup analyses of included studies on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were included. The database consisted of 82,784 patients, with 43,875 (53%) on new oral P2Y12 inhibitors and 38909 (47%) on intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors compared with clopidogrel. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The primary safety endpoint was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding. New oral P2Y12 inhibitors significantly decreased MACEs (odds ratio: 0.85, p<0.0001 for the whole cohort; OR: 0.77, p=0.04 for STEMI) and all-cause death (OR: 0.88, p=0.04 for the whole cohort; OR: 0.77, p=0.01 for STEMI). Among new intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors, only cangrelor significantly decreased the risk of MACEs. An increase in TIMI major bleeding was observed only by prasugrel among the new P2Y12 inhibitors.. New oral P2Y12 inhibitors reduce ischemic events, but there is no obvious increase in major bleeding in patients with CAD, and the risk/benefit ratio is particularly favorable for STEMI patients. Moreover, only cangrelor is beneficial for ischemic events in patients on new intravenous P2Y12 inhibitors.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Adenosine Monophosphate; Administration, Oral; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Restenosis; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Quinazolinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents; Stroke; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Strategies to prevent stroke recurrences and stroke-related morbidity and mortality are a major concern for healthcare systems worldwide. Antithrombotic therapy is the cornerstone for the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke.. This article is an overview of currently used antithrombotic therapies in the management of ischaemic stroke with special focus on their pharmacokinetic properties and how these properties may influence their clinical utility. This review covers both antiplatelet drugs and antitcoagulants used in the primary and secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke.. The role of aspirin in the early management of stroke is well established. Furthermore, antiplatelet drugs (aspirin, aspirin/dypiridamol and clopidogrel) are the cornerstone of secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke, while their role in the primary prevention is less well established. There are limited data on the use of novel antiplatelet agents for the management of stroke patients. Anticoagulation has not been associated with clinical benefits when used early in the management of acute ischaemic stroke. Long-term therapy with vitamin K antagonists provides prognostic benefit in patients with atrial fibrillation and additional stroke risk factors. New oral anticoagulants have demonstrated at least similar efficacy with vitamin K anatagonists in preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Cilostazol; Clopidogrel; Factor Xa; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Factors; Stroke; Tetrazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombin; Ticlopidine; Vitamin K

The initial 2010 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Guidelines for the Use of Antiplatelet Therapy in the Outpatient Setting were published in May 2011. As part of a planned re-evaluation within 2 years, we conducted an extensive literature search encompassing all topics included in the 2010 CCS Guidelines, and concluded that there were sufficient new data to merit revisiting the guidance on antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention in the first year after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass grafting, and the interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors. In addition, new clinical trials information about the efficacy and safety of combining novel oral anticoagulants with antiplatelet therapy in ACS justified the addition of a new section of recommendations to the Guidelines. In this focused update, we provide recommendations for the use of clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and prasugrel in non-ST elevation ACS, avoidance of prasugrel in patients with previous stroke/transient ischemic attack, higher doses of clopidogrel (j) /day) for the first 6 days after ACS, and the preferential use of prasugrel or ticagrelor after percutaneous coronary intervention in ACS. For non-ACS stented patients, we recommend acetylsalicylic acid/clopidogrel for 1 year, with at least 1 month of therapy for bare-metal stent patients and 3 months for drug-eluting stent patients unable to tolerate year-long double therapy. We also consider therapy for patients with a history of stent thrombosis, the indications for longer-term treatment, discontinuation timing preoperatively, indications for changing agents, the management of antiplatelet therapy before and after bypass surgery, and use/selection of proton pump inhibitors along with antiplatelet agents.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Contraindications; Coronary Artery Bypass; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Secondary Prevention; Stents; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Administration of a P2Y 12 -receptor antagonist in addition to aspirin is mandatory in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce the occurrence of thrombotic events; however, their impact on mortality and stroke is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the influence of moderate (clopidogrel) or potent (prasugrel/ticagrelor) P2Y 12 -receptor inhibition on major cardiovascular outcomes among patients with ACS or undergoing PCI. Systematic literature search was performed to find randomised, controlled clinical trials comparing the clinical impact of clopidogrel with placebo or prasugrel/ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. Outcome measures included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), total stroke and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). Random-effects model with Mantel-Heanszel weighting was used to pool outcomes into a meta-analysis. Four studies comparing clopidogrel with placebo and five trials comparing clopidogrel with new P2Y 12 -receptor inhibitors were identified including a total of 107,473 patients. Compared to placebo, clopidogrel reduced the risk of cardiovascular death (odds ratio [OR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.99, p=0.02), MI (OR 0.80; 95%CI 0.74-0.88, p<0.00001) and stroke (OR 0.84; 95%CI 0.72-0.97, p=0.02), without influencing risk for ICH (OR 0.96; 95%CI 0.69-1.33, p=0.79). Treatment with prasugrel/ticagrelor provided additional benefit over clopidogrel regarding cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.86; 95%CI 0.78-0.94, p=0.002) and MI (OR: 0.83; 95%CI 0.74-0.93, p<0.001), but no advantage in stroke (OR: 1.06; 95%CI 0.88-1.26, p=0.55) and in ICH (OR: 1.16; 95%CI 0.75-1.81; p=0.49) was observed. Increased potency of P2Y 12 -receptor inhibition is associated with decreased risk in cardiovascular death and MI; however, this association is not true in case of stroke, where potent P2Y 12 -receptor antagonists have no incremental benefit over clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The new definition and risk stratification for transient ischemic attack (TIA) have clear implications for the urgency of evaluation and treatment. The optimal antithrombotic treatment for TIA is being intensively studied. New guidelines for prevention of non-cardioembolic stroke in patients with stroke or TIA recommend the use of antiplatelet agents rather than oral anticoagulation. New antiplatelet drugs are being used in cardiovascular patients, and their role in cerebrovascular patients is being studied. The impact of genetic CYP2C19 polymorphisms is becoming clarified in cardiovascular patients and it is likely these polymorphisms will affect the management of cerebrovascular patients. The results of trials of clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients with lacunar strokes and acute TIAs are forthcoming. The results of CLOSURE I, a study of a patent foramen ovale device closure trial for cryptogenic stroke or TIA, showed no differences in stroke or TIA at 2 years.

Topics: Adenosine; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Brain Ischemia; Cilostazol; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Fibrinolytic Agents; Foramen Ovale, Patent; Genotype; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Tetrazoles; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Diabetics have a prothrombotic state that includes increased platelet reactivity. This contributes to the less favorable clinical outcomes observed in diabetics experiencing acute coronary syndromes as well as stable coronary artery disease. Many diabetics are relatively resistant to or have insufficient response to several antithrombotic agents. In the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention, hyporesponsiveness to clopidogrel is particularly common among diabetics. Several strategies have been examined to further enhance the benefits of oral antiplatelet therapy in diabetics. These include increasing the dose of clopidogrel, triple antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol, and new agents such as prasugrel. The large TRITON TIMI 38 randomized trial compared clopidogrel to prasugrel in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes. The diabetic subgroup (n = 3146) experienced considerable incremental benefit with a 4.8% reduction in cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke at 15-month follow-up with prasugrel treatment. Among diabetics on insulin this combined endpoint was reduced by 7.9% at 15 months. Major bleeding was not increased in the diabetic subgroup. This confirms the general hypothesis that more potent oral antiplatelet therapy can partially overcome the prothrombotic milieu and safely improve important clinical outcomes in diabetics.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To examine the efficacy and safety of prasugrel vs clopidogrel in thrombotic stroke patients at risk of ischemic stroke.. This multicenter, active-controlled, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study enrolled thrombotic stroke patients aged ≥ 50 years at risk of ischemic stroke. Patients received prasugrel (3.75 mg/day) or clopidogrel (75 or 50 mg/day) for 24-48 weeks; other antiplatelet drugs were prohibited. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite incidence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death from other vascular causes from the start to 1 day after treatment completion or discontinuation. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the incidences of ischemic stroke, MI, death from other vascular causes, ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack, and stroke. Safety endpoints included bleeding events and adverse events (AEs).. In the prasugrel (N=118) and clopidogrel (N=112; all received 75 mg) groups, the primary efficacy endpoint composite incidence (95% confidence interval) was 6.8% (3.0%-12.9%) and 7.1% (3.1%-13.6%), respectively. The risk ratio (prasugrel/clopidogrel) was 0.949 (0.369-2.443). Secondary efficacy endpoints followed a similar trend. The combined incidences of life-threatening, major, and clinically relevant bleeding were 5.0% and 3.5% in the prasugrel and clopidogrel groups, respectively. The incidences of all bleeding events and AEs were 19.2% and 24.6% and 76.7% and 82.5% in the prasugrel and clopidogrel groups, respectively. No serious AEs were causally related to prasugrel.. We observed a risk reduction of 5% with prasugrel vs clopidogrel, indicating comparable efficacy. There were no major safety issues for prasugrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombotic Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prasugrel dose de-escalation therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM)-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. This was a post-hoc analysis of the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Diseases-Comparison of Reduction of Prasugrel Dose or Polymer Technology in ACS Patients) randomized trial. The efficacy and safety of prasugrel dose de-escalation therapy (prasugrel 5 mg daily) were compared with conventional therapy (prasugrel 10 mg daily) in patients with DM. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), clinically driven revascularization, stroke, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) class ≥2 bleeding events. The secondary ischaemic outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, defined as the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal MI, ST, or ischaemic stroke. Of 2338 patients randomized, 990 had DM. The primary endpoint of NACE occurred in 38 patients (7.6%) receiving prasugrel dose de-escalation and in 53 patients (11.3%) receiving conventional therapy among patients with DM [hazard ratio (HR) 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.99; P = 0.049]. Prasugrel dose de-escalation as compared with conventional therapy did not increase the risk of ischaemic events (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.56-1.88; P = 0.927) but decreased BARC class ≥2 bleeding in patients with DM (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23-0.84; P = 0.012).. Prasugrel dose de-escalation compared with conventional therapy may reduce the risk of net clinical outcomes, mostly driven by a reduction in bleeding without an increase in ischaemic events in patients with DM. Trial Registration: HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS, NCT02193971, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02193971.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Brain Ischemia; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke

The role of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus and multi-vessel disease has been questioned by the results of the FREEDOM trial, which showed superiority of coronary artery bypass graft(CABG) over first generation drug-eluting stents (DES) including a reduction in mortality. In the light of safer and more efficacious stents and significantly better medical management, those results that date back to 2012 need to be revisited. TUXEDO-2 is a study designed to compare two contemporary stents in Indian diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease.. The primary objective of the TUXEDO-2 study is to compare the clinical outcomes of PCI with ultra-thin Supraflex Cruz vs Xience when combined with contemporary optimal medical therapy (OMT) in diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease. The secondary objective is to compare clinical outcomes between a pooled cohort from both arms of the study (Supraflex Cruz + Xience; PCI arm) vs CABG based on a performance goal derived from the CABG arm of the FREEDOM trial (historical cohort). The tertiary objective is a randomized comparison of ticagrelor vs prasugrel in addition to aspirin for the composite of ischemic and bleeding events.. In this prospective, open-label, multi-centre, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, controlled study, 1,800 patients with diabetes mellitus and multi-vessel disease (inclusion criteria similar to FREEDOM trial) with indication for coronary revascularization will be randomly assigned to Supraflex Cruz or Xience stents and also to ticagrelor- or prasugrel- based antiplatelet strategies. All patients will receive guideline directed OMT and optimal PCI including image- and physiology-guided complete revascularization where feasible. The patients will be followed through five years to assess their clinical status and major clinical events. The primary endpoint is a non-inferiority comparison of target lesion failure at one-year for Supraflex Cruz vs Xience (primary objective) with an expected event rate of 11% and a non-inferiority margin of 4.5%. For PCI vs CABG (secondary objective), the primary endpoint is major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of all cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke at one-year and yearly up to five years, with a performance goal of 21.6%. For ticagrelor vs prasugrel (tertiary objective), the primary endpoint is composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding as per the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) at one-year with expected event rate of 15% and a non-inferiority margin of 5%.. The TUXEDO-2 study is a contemporary study involving state-of-the-art PCI combined with guideline directed OMT in a complex subset of patients with diabetes mellitus and multi-vessel disease. The trial will answer the question as to whether a biodegradable polymer coated ultra-thin Supraflex Cruz stent is an attractive option for PCI in diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease. It will also help address the question whether the results of FREEDOM trial would have been different in the current era of safer and more efficacious stents and modern medical therapy. In addition, the comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs prasugrel in addition to aspirin will be evaluated. (CTRI/2019/11/022088).

Topics: Aspirin; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Everolimus; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

In the AFIRE trial, rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy with rivaroxaban and an antiplatelet agent for thromboembolic events or death, and superior for major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease. Little is known about impacts of stroke and bleeding risks on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban monotherapy.. In this subanalysis of the AFIRE trial, we assessed the risk of stroke and bleeding by the CHADS. Rivaroxaban monotherapy significantly reduced the primary efficacy and safety end points with no evidence of differential effects by stroke risk (CHADS. The advantages of rivaroxaban monotherapy compared with those of combination therapy with respect to all prespecified end points, including thromboembolism, bleeding, and mortality were similar across patients with AF and stable coronary artery disease, irrespective of their risk for stroke and bleeding.. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000016612, and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02642419.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Adjustment; Rivaroxaban; Stroke

Topics: Adult; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke

The safety of prasugrel in elderly and/or low body weight Japanese patients with ischemic stroke who have a relatively high bleeding risk with antiplatelet therapy remains unknown.. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term prasugrel monotherapy for stroke prevention compared with clopidogrel in elderly and/or low body weight Japanese patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke.. In this randomized, double-blind, comparative, phase III study, elderly (age ≥75 years) and/or low body weight (≤50 kg) Japanese patients with a previous history of non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke were assigned to a prasugrel 3.75 mg (PRA3.75) group, a prasugrel 2.5 mg (PRA2.5) group, or a clopidogrel 50 mg (CLO50) group and followed up for 48 weeks. The primary safety endpoint was the combined incidence of primary safety events, defined as life-threatening, major, and other clinically relevant bleeding. The efficacy endpoint was a composite of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and death from other vascular causes.. A total of 654 patients (age 76.4 ± 7.3 years, body weight 55.6 ± 9.3 kg, women 43.9%) from 74 medical institutions within Japan were enrolled. The combined incidence (95% CI) of primary safety events was 4.2% (1.9-7.8%), 1.9% (0.5-4.7%), and 3.6% (1.6-6.9%) in the PRA3.75 group (n = 216), PRA2.5 group (n = 215), and CLO50 group (n = 223), respectively (hazard ratios [HR] PRA3.75/CLO50, 1.13 [0.44-2.93]; PRA2.5/CLO50, 0.51 [0.15-1.69]). The incidences of bleeding leading to treatment discontinuation (95% CI) were 2.3% (0.8-5.3%), 0.9% (0.1-3.3%), and 2.2% (0.7-5.2%) in the PRA3.75, PRA2.5, and CLO50 groups, respectively (HRs PRA3.75/CLO50, 1.01 [0.29-3.48]; PRA2.5/CLO50, 0.41 [0.08-2.12]). There was no significant difference in all bleeding events between groups. The incidence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and death from other vascular causes was lower, but not significantly so, in patients treated with prasugrel than in patients treated with clopidogrel: PRA3.75, 0.0% (0/216); PRA2.5, 3.3% (7/215); and CLO50, 3.6% (8/223; HRs PRA3.75/CLO50, 0.00 [0.00-0.00]; PRA2.5/CLO50, 0.90 [0.32-2.47]).. Elderly and/or low body weight -Japanese patients with previous non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke who received PRA3.75 showed similar results in terms of primary safety endpoint, and a numerically lower incidence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and death from other vascular causes, compared with those who received CLO50.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian People; Body Weight; Brain Ischemia; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Health Status; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Current guidelines recommend potent platelet inhibition with ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients after an acute coronary syndrome. However, data about optimal platelet inhibition in older patients are scarce. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel compared with ticagrelor or prasugrel in older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).. We did the open-label, randomised controlled POPular AGE trial in 12 sites (ten hospitals and two university hospitals) in the Netherlands. Patients aged 70 years or older with NSTE-ACS were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using an internet-based randomisation procedure with block sizes of six to receive a loading dose of clopidogrel 300 mg or 600 mg, or ticagrelor 180 mg or prasugrel 60 mg, and then a maintenance dose for the duration of 12 months (clopidogrel 75 mg once daily, ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily, or prasugrel 10 mg once daily) on top of standard care. Patient and treating physicians were aware of the allocated treatment strategy, but the outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. Primary bleeding outcome consisted of PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO; major or minor bleeding [superiority hypothesis]). Co-primary net clinical benefit outcome consisted of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, PLATO major and minor bleeding (non-inferiority hypothesis, margin of 2%). Follow-up duration was 12 months. Analyses were done on intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NL3804), ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02317198), and EudraCT (2013-001403-37).. Between June 10, 2013, and Oct 17, 2018, 1002 patients were randomly assigned to clopidogrel (n=500) or ticagrelor or prasugrel (n=502). Because 475 (95%) patients received ticagrelor in the ticagrelor or prasugrel group, we will refer to this group as the ticagrelor group. Premature discontinuation of the study drug occurred in 238 (47%) of 502 ticagrelor group patients randomly assigned to ticagrelor, and in 112 (22%) of 500 patients randomly assigned to clopidogrel. Primary bleeding outcome was significantly lower in the clopidogrel group (88 [18%] of 500 patients) than in the ticagrelor group (118 [24%] of 502; hazard ratio 0·71, 95% CI 0·54 to 0·94; p=0·02 for superiority). Co-primary net clinical benefit outcome was non-inferior for the use of clopidogrel (139 [28%]) versus ticagrelor (161 [32%]; absolute risk difference -4%, 95% CI -10·0 to 1·4; p=0·03 for non-inferiority). The most important reasons for discontinuation were occurrence of bleeding (n=38), dyspnoea (n=40), and the need for treatment with oral anticoagulation (n=35).. In patients aged 70 years or older presenting with NSTE-ACS, clopidogrel is a favourable alternative to ticagrelor, because it leads to fewer bleeding events without an increase in the combined endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding. Clopidogrel could be an alternative P2Y12 inhibitor especially for elderly patients with a higher bleeding risk.. ZonMw.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Even among biomarker-negative patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), periprocedural thrombotic and bleeding complications can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Whether stronger platelet inhibition by an intensified oral loading strategy (ILS) before PCI impacts on outcomes among these patients in contemporary practice remains unclear.. This multicenter, randomized, assessor-blinded trial tested the hypothesis that in elective PCI prasugrel 60 mg (ILS) is superior to standard loading strategy with clopidogrel 600 mg regarding a composite primary end point of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, definite/probable stent thrombosis, stroke, or urgent vessel revascularization. After PCI, all patients were on clopidogrel 75 mg/day and aspirin. The trial was terminated prematurely because of slower-than-expected recruitment and funding discontinuation.. Of 781 patients included in the final analysis, 382 were assigned to ILS and 399 to standard loading strategy. At 30 days, the primary end point occurred in 66 patients (17.3%) assigned to ILS and 74 patients (18.6%) assigned to standard loading strategy (odds ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.32];. In biomarker-negative stable and unstable angina patients undergoing elective PCI, the trial did not find a conclusive difference in efficacy or safety. This observation should be interpreted in the context of wide CIs and premature termination of the trial. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02548611.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Administration Schedule; Early Termination of Clinical Trials; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Ischemia; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Dual antiplatelet therapy is commonly used for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aspirin and prasugrel at standard dosages in Korean patients using clinical outcome data.Methods and Results:For this prospective multicenter phase IV post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study, ACS patients from 29 July 2012 to 28 July 2016 were recruited. Patients received aspirin at a dose of 75-150 mg daily and a standard dose of prasugrel. Bleeding events were recorded and summarized to evaluate safety. Data on adverse events (AEs) and composite events such as cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke were recorded and summarized to assess efficacy. Of the 3,283 patients recruited, data from 3,110 and 3,044 patients were included in the safety and efficacy analyses, respectively (median treatment duration, 172 days). The most frequently reported AE was ecchymosis (2.8%). The number of patients with major bleeding was 29/3,110 (0.93%). The discontinuation rate for any reason was 12.6%. The number of cases that ended in CV death, MI, stroke, stent thrombosis, or unplanned coronary revascularization was 26/3,044 (0.85%).. The present results are similar to those observed in clinical trials where administration of low-dose aspirin plus prasugrel was associated with a low rate of major bleeding and CV events.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Republic of Korea; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Data on the comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention are limited. We assessed the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in a head-to-head comparison in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.. In this prespecified subgroup analysis, we included 1653 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction randomized to receive ticagrelor or prasugrel in the setting of the ISAR REACT-5 trial (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 5). The primary end point was the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 1 year after randomization. The secondary end point was the incidence of bleeding defined as BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) type 3 to 5 bleeding at 1 year after randomization.. In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, there was no significant difference in the primary end point between prasugrel and ticagrelor. Ticagrelor was associated with a significant increase in the risk for recurrent myocardial infarction. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01944800.

Topics: Aged; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stents; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The relative merits of ticagrelor as compared with prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes for whom invasive evaluation is planned are uncertain.. In this multicenter, randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients who presented with acute coronary syndromes and for whom invasive evaluation was planned to receive either ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 1 year. A major secondary end point (the safety end point) was bleeding.. A total of 4018 patients underwent randomization. A primary end-point event occurred in 184 of 2012 patients (9.3%) in the ticagrelor group and in 137 of 2006 patients (6.9%) in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.70; P = 0.006). The respective incidences of the individual components of the primary end point in the ticagrelor group and the prasugrel group were as follows: death, 4.5% and 3.7%; myocardial infarction, 4.8% and 3.0%; and stroke, 1.1% and 1.0%. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 1.3% of patients assigned to ticagrelor and 1.0% of patients assigned to prasugrel, and definite stent thrombosis occurred in 1.1% and 0.6%, respectively. Major bleeding (as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium scale) was observed in 5.4% of patients in the ticagrelor group and in 4.8% of patients in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.51; P = 0.46).. Among patients who presented with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation, the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was significantly lower among those who received prasugrel than among those who received ticagrelor, and the incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the two groups. (Funded by the German Center for Cardiovascular Research and Deutsches Herzzentrum München; ISAR-REACT 5 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01944800.).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stents; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Despite guideline recommendations, many patients discontinue P2Y12 inhibitor therapy earlier than the recommended 1 year after myocardial infarction (MI), and higher-potency P2Y12 inhibitors are underutilized. Cost is frequently cited as an explanation for both of these observations.. To determine whether removing co-payment barriers increases P2Y12 inhibitor persistence and lowers risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).. Cluster randomized clinical trial among 301 hospitals enrolling adult patients with acute MI (June 5, 2015, through September 30, 2016); patients were followed up for 1 year after discharge (final date of follow-up was October 23, 2017), with blinded adjudication of MACE; choice of P2Y12 inhibitor was per clinician discretion.. Hospitals randomized to the intervention (n = 131 [6436 patients]) provided patients with co-payment vouchers for clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 1 year (median voucher value for a 30-day supply, $137 [25th-75th percentile, $20-$339]). Hospitals randomized to usual care (n = 156 [4565 patients]) did not provide study vouchers.. Independent coprimary outcomes were patient-reported persistence with P2Y12 inhibitor (defined as continued treatment without gap in use ≥30 days) and MACE (death, recurrent MI, or stroke) at 1 year among patients discharged with a prescription for clopidogrel or ticagrelor.. Among 11 001 enrolled patients (median age, 62 years; 3459 [31%] women), 10 102 patients were discharged with prescriptions for clopidogrel or ticagrelor (clopidogrel prescribed to 2317 [36.0%] in the intervention group and 2497 [54.7%] in the usual care group), 4393 of 6135 patients (72%) in the intervention group used the voucher, and follow-up data at 1 year were available for 10 802 patients (98.2%). Patient-reported persistence with P2Y12 inhibitors at 1 year was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (unadjusted rates, 5340/6135 [87.0%] vs 3324/3967 [83.8%], respectively; P < .001; adjusted difference, 2.3% [95% CI, 0.4% to 4.1%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.40]). There was no significant difference in MACE at 1 year between intervention and usual care groups (unadjusted cumulative incidence, 10.2% vs 10.6%; P = .65; adjusted difference, 0.66% [95% CI, -0.73% to 2.06%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.25]).. Among patients with MI, provision of vouchers to offset medication co-payments for P2Y12 inhibitors, compared with no vouchers, resulted in a 3.3% absolute increase in patient-reported persistence with P2Y12 inhibitors and no significant reduction in 1-year MACE outcomes.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02406677.

Topics: Aged; Clopidogrel; Cost Sharing; Drug Costs; Female; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Stroke; Ticagrelor

The effect of prasugrel in terms of the prevention of recurrence of ischaemic stroke is unknown. We investigated the non-inferiority of prasugrel to clopidogrel for prevention of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and death from other vascular causes in Japanese patients with non-cardioembolic stroke.. In this phase 3 randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial, patients aged 20-74 years who had had a non-cardioembolic stroke in the previous 1-26 weeks were recruited from 224 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive prasugrel (3·75 mg/day) or clopidogrel (75 mg/day) orally for 96-104 weeks. Randomisation was stratified according to stroke subtype. The randomisation schedule was generated by an independent statistician who created a computer-generated random number sequence. Patients, investigators, and the funder were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was combined incidence of ischaemic stroke (fatal and non-fatal), myocardial infarction (fatal and non-fatal), and death from other vascular causes in the intention-to-treat population. The safety endpoint was incidence of bleeding events, comprising life-threatening bleeding, major bleeding, and clinically relevant bleeding. The safety analysis was done in the population excluding trial patients with serious Good Clinical Practice violations, and those who had not taken the trial drug. The predefined non-inferiority margin was an upper 95% CI limit for the risk ratio (RR) of 1·35. The trial was registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (JapicCTI-111582).. Patients were recruited between Sept 1, 2011, and June 12, 2015. 3747 patients (797 [21%] women) were enrolled, with a mean age of 62·1 (SD 8·5) years. 3753 patients were randomly assigned to treatment and, of these patients, 1885 in the prasugrel group and 1862 in the clopidogrel group were confirmed to have taken the trial drug at least once, and six patients withdrew from the trial before administration of the trial drug. Thus, a total of 3747 patients were included in the full analysis set. 73 (4%) of 1885 patients in the prasugrel group and 69 (4%) of 1862 patients in the clopidogrel group reached the primary endpoint (RR 1·05, 95% CI 0·76-1·44). The incidence of bleeding events was not significantly different between treatment groups; life-threatening bleeding was observed in 18 (1%) patients in the prasugrel group and 23 (1%) patients in the clopidogrel group (RR 0·77, 0·41-1·42).. The non-inferiority of prasugrel to clopidogrel for the prevention of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and death from other vascular causes was not confirmed in Japanese patients with non-cardioembolic stroke. No safety concerns were identified.. Daiichi Sankyo.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain Ischemia; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke

The value of platelet function testing (PFT) in predicting clinical outcomes and guiding P2Y12-inhibitor treatment is uncertain. In a pre-specified sub-study of the TROPICAL-ACS trial, we assessed ischaemic and bleeding risks according to high platelet reactivity (HPR) and low platelet reactivity (LPR) to ADP in patients receiving uniform prasugrel vs. PFT-guided clopidogrel or prasugrel.. Acute coronary syndrome patients with PFT done 14 days after hospital discharge were included with prior randomization to uniform prasugrel for 12 months (control group, no treatment modification) vs. early de-escalation from prasugrel to clopidogrel and PFT-guided maintenance treatment (HPR: switch-back to prasugrel, non-HPR: clopidogrel). The composite ischaemic endpoint included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, while key safety outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2-5 bleeding, from PFT until 12 months. We identified 2527 patients with PFT results available: 1266 were randomized to the guided and 1261 to the control group. Before treatment adjustment, HPR was more prevalent in the guided group (40% vs. 15%), while LPR was more common in control patients (27% vs. 11%). Compared to control patients without HPR on prasugrel (n = 1073), similar outcomes were observed in guided patients kept on clopidogrel [n = 755, hazard ratio (HR): 1.06 (0.57-1.95), P = 0.86] and also in patients with HPR on clopidogrel switched to prasugrel [n = 511, HR: 0.96 (0.47-1.96), P = 0.91]. In contrast, HPR on prasugrel was associated with a higher risk for ischaemic events in control patients [n = 188, HR: 2.16 (1.01-4.65), P = 0.049]. Low platelet reactivity was an independent predictor of bleeding [HR: 1.74 (1.18-2.56), P = 0.005], without interaction (Pint = 0.76) between study groups.. Based on this substudy of a randomized trial, selecting prasugrel or clopidogrel based on PFT resulted in similar ischaemic outcomes as uniform prasugrel therapy without HPR. Although infrequent, HPR on prasugrel was associated with increased risk of ischaemic events. Low platelet reactivity was a strong and independent predictor of bleeding both on prasugrel and clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Blood Platelets; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Death; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemia; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

This comparison of PRAsugrel and clopidogrel in Japanese patients with ischemic STROke (PRASTRO)-I trial investigates the noninferiority of prasugrel to clopidogrel sulfate in the prevention of recurrence of primary events (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and death from other vascular causes), and the long-term safety of prasugrel in Japanese patients with non-cardioembolic stroke.. This was an active-controlled, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study conducted between July 2011 and March 2016 at multiple centers around Japan. Patients had to meet eligibility criteria before receiving 3.75 mg prasugrel or 75 mg clopidogrel orally once daily for a period of 96-104 weeks.. A total of 3747 patients were included in this trial; 1598 in the 3.75 mg prasugrel group and 1551 in the 75 mg clopidogrel group completed the study. During the study period, 287 (15.2%) patients in the prasugrel group and 311 (16.7%) in the clopidogrel group discontinued treatment. Baseline characteristics, safety, and efficacy results are forthcoming and will be published separately.. This article presents the study design and rationale for a trial investigating the noninferiority of prasugrel to clopidogrel sulfate with regards to the inhibitory effect on primary events in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke.

Topics: Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Japan; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Guided de-escalation of P2Y12-inhibitor treatment was recently identified as an effective alternative treatment strategy in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Safety and efficacy of this strategy may differ in relation to patient's age. This pre-specified analysis of the TROPICAL-ACS trial aimed to assess the impact of age on clinical outcomes following guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in ACS patients.. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to either standard treatment with prasugrel for 12 months (control group) or to a guided de-escalation regimen (1 week prasugrel followed by 1 week clopidogrel and platelet function testing guided maintenance therapy with clopidogrel or prasugrel from day 14 after hospital discharge; guided de-escalation group). We used Cox regression models to assess the associations of age on clinical endpoints and interactions. In younger patients (age ≤70, n = 2240), the 1 year incidence of the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or bleeding ≥ grade 2 according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria) was significantly lower in guided de-escalation vs. control group [5.9% vs. 8.3%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.96; P = 0.03, number needed to treat = 42]. In elderly patients (age >70, n = 370), the absolute risk of events was higher without significant differences between guided de-escalation vs. control group (15.5% vs. 13.6%; HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.69-2.01; P = 0.56). When the impact of age, as a continuous variable, was analysed on outcomes after guided de-escalation vs. control treatment, an increasing relative risk reduction was observed in the primary endpoint by decreasing age (Pint = 0.02), due to significant reductions in bleeding.. Treatment effects of guided de-escalation for P2Y12 inhibitors depend on patient's age with younger patients deriving a significant net clinical benefit. Although the safety and efficacy of guided de-escalation in the elderly was similar to uniform prasugrel therapy, this should be further investigated due to the limited sample size of this group.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Blood Platelets; Clopidogrel; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment; Single-Blind Method; Stroke

Topics: Aged; Clopidogrel; Cross-Over Studies; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticlopidine

This study sought to determine whether patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) experience different reductions in ischemic event and increases in bleeding events with extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy versus those without PAD.. Patients with PAD have increased ischemic and bleeding risks after coronary stenting.. The DAPT (Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) study randomized 11,648 patients free from ischemic and bleeding events 12 months after coronary stenting to continued thienopyridine plus aspirin therapy for an additional 18 months versus aspirin therapy alone. The effects of continued thienopyridine on myocardial infarction (MI) or stent thrombosis, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (death, MI, or stroke) and bleeding (GUSTO [Global Utilization of t-PA and Streptokinase for Occluded Coronary Arteries] moderate or severe) were assessed among those with versus without PAD.. Among 11,648 randomized patients, 649 (5.57%) had PAD. Between 12 and 30 months, randomized patients with PAD had higher rates of MI/stent thrombosis (6.03% vs. 2.92%; p < 0.001), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (11.65% vs. 4.62%; p < 0.001), and bleeding (4.86% vs. 1.74%; p < 0.001). Continued thienopyridine versus placebo was associated with consistent treatment effects for MI/stent thrombosis (with PAD, HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.22; without PAD, HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.66; interaction p = 0.631), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (with PAD, HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.67; without PAD, HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.84; interaction p = 0.103), and bleeding (with PAD, HR, 1.82; 95% CI: 0.87 to 3.83; without PAD, HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.24; interaction p = 0.811).. Among patients undergoing coronary stenting, those with PAD have more ischemic and bleeding events versus those without PAD. Extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with consistent ischemic benefit and bleeding harm among patients with and without PAD.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Thrombosis; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Stents; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Current guidelines recommend potent platelet inhibition with prasugrel or ticagrelor for 12 months after an acute coronary syndrome managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the greatest anti-ischaemic benefit of potent antiplatelet drugs over the less potent clopidogrel occurs early, while most excess bleeding events arise during chronic treatment. Hence, a stage-adapted treatment with potent platelet inhibition in the acute phase and de-escalation to clopidogrel in the maintenance phase could be an alternative approach. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of early de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment from prasugrel to clopidogrel guided by platelet function testing (PFT).. In this investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, assessor-blinded, multicentre trial (TROPICAL-ACS) done at 33 sites in Europe, patients were enrolled if they had biomarker-positive acute coronary syndrome with successful PCI and a planned duration of dual antiplatelet treatment of 12 months. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an internet-based randomisation procedure with a computer-generated block randomisation with stratification across study sites to either standard treatment with prasugrel for 12 months (control group) or a step-down regimen (1 week prasugrel followed by 1 week clopidogrel and PFT-guided maintenance therapy with clopidogrel or prasugrel from day 14 after hospital discharge; guided de-escalation group). The assessors were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was net clinical benefit (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or bleeding grade 2 or higher according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC]) criteria) 1 year after randomisation (non-inferiority hypothesis; margin of 30%). Analysis was intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01959451, and EudraCT, 2013-001636-22.. Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment was non-inferior to standard treatment with prasugrel at 1 year after PCI in terms of net clinical benefit. Our trial shows that early de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment can be considered as an alternative approach in patients with acute coronary syndrome managed with PCI.. Klinikum der Universität München, Roche Diagnostics, Eli Lilly, and Daiichi Sankyo.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticlopidine

Patients with atrial fibrillation who undergo coronary stenting require triple antithrombotic therapy, including aspirin, a P2Y. We hypothesized that 1-month P2Y. SAFE-A (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry Number: UMIN000015923) is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, parallel-group, comparative study that was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of short-duration treatment with a P2Y. The SAFE-A study is the first randomized controlled trial to compare 1-month vs. 6-month P2Y

Topics: Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Blood Transfusion; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Stroke; Ticlopidine

We aimed to study the relationship of chronic kidney disease stages with long-term ischemic and bleeding outcomes in medically managed acute coronary syndrome patients and the influence of more potent antiplatelet therapies on platelet reactivity by chronic kidney disease stage.. We estimated creatinine clearance for 8953 medically managed acute coronary syndrome patients enrolled in the Targeted Platelet Inhibition to Clarify the Optimal Strategy to Medically Manage Acute Coronary Syndromes trial. Patients were classified by chronic kidney disease stage: normal renal function/mild (creatinine clearance >60 mL/min); moderate (creatinine clearance 30-60 mL/min); severe (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min). Kaplan-Meier event rates through 30 months were evaluated for ischemic (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke; primary end point) and bleeding (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction bleeding) outcomes by chronic kidney disease stage and treatment allocation (prasugrel vs. clopidogrel) within each stage. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for moderate and for severe chronic kidney disease vs. normal/mild chronic kidney disease were estimated. Platelet reactivity at 30 days was assessed in a subset of patients (n = 1947). The majority of patients were in the normal/mild chronic kidney disease group (67%), followed by moderate chronic kidney disease (29%) and severe chronic kidney disease (4%). The incidence of ischemic and bleeding outcomes increased sharply across chronic kidney disease stages and no significant treatment interactions were observed. The adjusted risk of the primary end point increased across chronic kidney disease stages (moderate vs. normal/mild: hazard ratio 1.26; 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.46; severe vs. normal/mild: hazard ratio 1.60; 95% confidence interval 1.25-2.04). Platelet reactivity was lower in patients treated with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel, across all three chronic kidney disease stages.. Among medically managed acute coronary syndrome patients, the long-term risks of ischemic and bleeding outcomes increased markedly with worse chronic kidney disease stages. Despite lower platelet reactivity of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel, no treatment interactions for ischemic and bleeding outcomes were observed.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Creatinine; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

We investigated whether prior clopidogrel influenced long-term ischaemic and bleeding risks and modified the randomised treatment effect of clopidogrel versus prasugrel among medically managed patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with dual antiplatelet therapy.. Medically managed patients with ACS in the Targeted Platelet Inhibition to Clarify the Optimal Strategy to Medically Manage Acute Coronary Syndromes (TRILOGY ACS) trial were randomised to clopidogrel versus prasugrel (plus aspirin), stratified by prior clopidogrel use. From the analysis population (n=8927), we compared two groups: 'clopidogrel in-hospital (n=6513)' (clopidogrel started ≤72 h of presentation for index ACS event) and 'prior-clopidogrel (n=2414)' (on clopidogrel ≥5 days before index hospitalisation). Treatment-related differences in ischaemic (all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and the composite of CV death/MI/stroke) and bleeding outcomes (severe/life-threatening or moderate bleeding events based on Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) criteria) through 30 months were analysed between patients in the two groups.. Compared with 'clopidogrel in-hospital,' 'prior clopidogrel' patients were younger (median 64 years vs 66 years, p<0.001), more likely to have prior CV events/revascularisation, and had a higher frequency of CV death, MI or stroke through 30 months (20.8% vs 18.2%, p=0.002), with no difference in bleeding events (2.3% vs 3.4%, p=0.50). Randomised treatment effect (prasugrel vs clopidogrel) was similar for ischaemic and bleeding outcomes in both groups (all pinteraction>0.05).. Patients receiving clopidogrel before admission for ACS and subsequently treated only medically are at higher risk for CV events versus those not previously receiving clopidogrel. More potent antiplatelet inhibition with prasugrel versus clopidogrel did not significantly reduce this risk.. NCT00699998.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This study assessed whether the choice of vascular access site influenced outcomes among non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients enrolled in the ACCOAST (A Comparison of prasugrel at the time of percutaneous Coronary intervention Or as pre-treatment At the time of diagnosis in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction NCT01015287).. Transfemoral access (TFA) has been associated with the risk of bleeding and increased mortality that is elevated compared to transradial access (TRA) in acute coronary syndromes, although less consistently in NSTE acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) than in STE-ACS.. The ACCOAST study evaluated a prasugrel loading dose of 60 mg given at the start of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus a split loading dose of 30 mg given at the time of diagnosis of NSTE-ACS (prior to coronary angiography), followed by 30 mg given at the start of PCI. In the study, choice of access site was at the investigator's discretion. We compared ischemic and bleeding outcomes with TFA versus those with TRA, using propensity score correction.. Of 4,033 patients, 1,711 (42%) underwent TRA. Use of TRA varied widely by country. TFA was not associated with significant increases in noncoronary bypass graft (CABG)-related thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) (hazard ratio [HR] for TFA = 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59 to 3.62; p = 0.42), nor in GUSTO (Global Utilization Of Streptokinase and Tpa for Occluded arteries) or STEEPLE (Safety and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in PCI) major bleeding after propensity score correction. TFA, however, increased combined non-CABG TIMI major or minor bleeding (HR for TFA = 2.34; 95% CI: 1.17 to 4.69; p = 0.017). Primary ischemic outcomes did not differ by access site, albeit individual endpoint analysis suggested an association between TFA with an increase in urgent revascularizations and reduced risk of procedure-related stroke.. In the ACCOAST trial, TFA did not significantly increase TIMI major bleeding, although TRA was associated with a reduction in TIMI major or minor bleeding. Further study is needed to determine whether wider application of radial approach to NSTE-ACS patients at high risk for bleeding improves overall outcomes. (A Comparison of Prasugrel at PCI or Time of Diagnosis of Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [ACCOAST]; NCT01015287).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Catheterization, Peripheral; Coronary Angiography; Databases, Factual; Female; Femoral Artery; Hemorrhage; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Punctures; Radial Artery; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; <40 mg/dL) are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events, but it is unclear whether lower thresholds (<30 mg/dL) are associated with increased hazard.. Very low levels of HDL-C may provide prognostic information in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated medically without revascularization.. We examined data from 9064/9326 ACS patients enrolled in the TRILOGY ACS trial. Participants were randomized to clopidogrel or prasugrel plus aspirin. Study treatments continued for 6 to 30 months. Relationships between baseline HDL-C and the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke, and individual endpoints of death (cardiovascular and all-cause), MI, and stroke, adjusted for baseline characteristics through 30 months, were analyzed. The HDL-C was evaluated as a dichotomous variable-very low (<30 mg/dL) vs higher (≥30 mg/dL)-and continuously.. Median baseline HDL-C was 42 mg/dL (interquartile range, 34-49 mg/dL) with little variation over time. Frequency of the composite endpoint was similar for very low vs higher baseline HDL-C, with no risk difference between groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-1.34). Similar findings were seen for MI and stroke. However, risks for cardiovascular (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.13-1.78) and all-cause death (HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.11-1.67) were higher in patients with very low baseline HDL-C.. Medically managed ACS patients with very low baseline HDL-C levels have higher risk of long-term cardiovascular and all-cause death but similar risks for nonfatal ischemic outcomes vs patients with higher baseline HDL-C.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Aspirin; Biomarkers; Cholesterol, HDL; Clopidogrel; Down-Regulation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyslipidemias; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Associations between atrial fibrillation (AF), outcomes, and response to antiplatelet therapies in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) managed medically without revascularization remain uncertain. We examined these associations for medically managed ACS patients randomized to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using patient data from the TRILOGY ACS trial. DAPT included aspirin plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d or prasugrel 10 mg/d (5 mg/d for those <60 kg or age ≥75 years). Patients receiving oral anticoagulants were excluded. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to characterize associations between patients with AF (AF+) vs those without (AF-) and risk of ischemic and bleeding events, and to explore effects of randomized treatment on outcomes. Among 9101 patients with baseline AF status, 710 (7.8%) had AF. AF+ patients were older and had more comorbidities. Unadjusted associations of the composite of cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke were significantly higher among AF patients at 30 months (31.1% vs 18.4%; HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.35-1.92, P < 0.001), but differences did not persist after adjustment (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.97-1.39, P = 0.11). When individual components of the composite endpoint were evaluated, 30-month risk of events in AF+ patients was significantly higher. Thirty-month risk of all-cause death was significantly higher in AF+ patients: 18.1% vs 11.1% (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.30-2.02, P < 0.001). There was no significant interaction with randomized treatment and AF for the primary endpoint. Among medically managed high-risk ACS patients receiving DAPT, AF was associated with higher unadjusted risks of ischemic and bleeding outcomes that were similar by treatment group.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with drug eluting stents (DES) is still under debate. Recent meta-analyses on ≤6months versus 12months DAPT suggest that bleeding rates can be reduced, without a higher rate of thrombotic complications. In particular, the COMBO dual therapy stent, being associated with early re-endothelialization, may allow for a reduction of the duration of DAPT without increasing the thrombotic risk, while reducing the risk of bleeding complications.. The aim of the REDUCE trial is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a combined efficacy and safety endpoint of a short-term 3months DAPT strategy as compared to standard 12-month DAPT strategy in ACS patients treated with the COMBO stent.. A prospective, multicenter, randomized study designed to enroll 1500 patients with ACS treated with the COMBO stent. Patients will be randomized before discharge in a 1:1 fashion to either 3 or 12months of DAPT. A clinical follow-up is scheduled at 3, 6, 12, and 24months. The primary endpoint is the time to event as defined by the occurrence of one of the following: all cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, target vessel revascularization or bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Council type II, III and V) within 12months. The study has recruited patients since July 2014, and the results are expected in 2017.. A reduction of the DAPT duration in ACS patients after PCI without affecting the thrombotic risk is an attractive option with regard to the associated bleeding risk. The REDUCE trial will be the first to investigate the efficacy and safety of a 3-month DAPT strategy compared to a 12-month DAPT strategy in an ACS only population treated with the COMBO stent.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aspirin; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Hemorrhage; Humans; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Time Factors

Elderly patients display higher on clopidogrel platelet reactivity as compared with younger patients. Treatment with prasugrel 5mg has been shown to provide more predictable and homogenous antiplatelet effect, as compared with clopidogrel, suggesting the possibility of reducing ischemic events after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without increasing bleeding.. The Elderly-ACS 2 study is a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial designed to demonstrate the superiority of a strategy of dual antiplatelet treatment using a reduced 5-mg daily dose of prasugrel over a standard strategy with a daily clopidogrel dose of 75mg in patients older than 74years with ACS (either ST- or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction) undergoing early percutaneous revascularization. The primary end point is the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial reinfarction, disabling stroke, and rehospitalization for cardiovascular causes or bleeding within 1 year. Taking advantage of the planned size of 2,000 patients, the secondary objective is to assess the prognostic impact of selected prerandomization variables (age, sex, diabetic status, serum creatinine level, electrocardiogram changes, abnormal troponin levels, basal and residual SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery [SYNTAX] score).. The Elderly-ACS 2 study is a multicenter, randomized trial comparing a strategy of dual antiplatelet therapy with a reduced dose of prasugrel with a standard dose of clopidogrel in elderly patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous revascularization (the Elderly ACS 2 trial: NCT01777503).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Early Medical Intervention; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Readmission; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Several methods provide new insights into understanding clinical trial composite endpoints, using both conventional and novel methods. The TRILOGY ACS trial is used as a contemporary example to prospectively compare these methods side by side.. The traditional time-to-first-event, Andersen-Gill recurrent events method, win ratio, and a weighted composite endpoint (WCE) are compared using the randomized, active-control TRILOGY ACS trial. This trial had a neutral result and randomized 9326 patients managed without coronary revascularization within 10 days of their acute coronary syndrome to receive either prasugrel or clopidogrel and followed them for up to 30 months. The traditional composite, win ratio, and WCE demonstrated no significant survival advantage for prasugrel, whereas the Andersen-Gill method demonstrated a statistical advantage for prasugrel [hazard ratio (HR), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72-0.97)]. The traditional composite used 73% of total patient events; 40% of these were derived from the death events. The win ratio used 66% of total events; deaths comprised 57% of these. Both Andersen-Gill and WCE methods used all events in all participants; however, with the Andersen-Gill method, death comprised 41% of the proportion of events, whereas with the WCE method, death comprised 64% of events.. This study addresses the relative efficiency of various methods for assessing clinical trial events comprising the composite endpoint. The methods accounting for all events, in particular those incorporating their clinical relevance, appear most advantageous, and may be useful in interpreting future trials. This clinical and statistical advantage is especially evident with long-term follow-up where multiple non-fatal events are more common.. NCT00699998.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Clopidogrel; Endpoint Determination; Humans; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Antiplatelet treatment is an important component in optimizing the clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prasugrel, which is a new P2Y12 inhibitor, has been confirmed as efficacious in a large trial in Western countries, and a similar trial is also to be launched in Asian countries. Although a 60-mg loading dose of prasugrel followed by 10 mg per day should be acceptable, there have been no data regarding the optimal dose in Asian patients. Furthermore, serum levels of prasugrel and the rates of platelet inhibition are known to be higher in Asians than Caucasians with the same dose of the drug. Polymer, a key component of drug-eluting stents (DES), has been suggested as the cause of inflammation leading to late complications, and has driven many companies to develop biodegradable-polymer DES. Currently, there are limited data regarding the head-to-head comparison between BP-BES and the biostable polymer CoCr-EES or the newest platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES). Furthermore, the polymer issue may be more important in ACS where there is ruptured thrombotic plaque where polymer-induced inflammation may affect the local milieu of the stented artery. Therefore, the present study dedicated only to ACS patients, will offer important information on the optimal prasugrel dose in the Asian population by comparing a 10-mg versus a 5-mg maintenance dose beyond 1 month after PCI, as well as giving important insight into the polymer issue by comparing BP-BES versus biostable-polymer PtCr-EES.. Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of coronary artery diseases--comparison of REDUCtion of prasugrEl dose or POLYmer TECHnology in ACS patients (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS) trial is a multicenter, randomized and open-label clinical study with a 2 × 2 factorial design, according to the type of stent (PtCr-EES versus BP-BES) and prasugrel maintenance dose (5 mg versus 10 mg), to demonstrate non-inferiority of PtCr-EES relative to BP-BES or the reduced prasugrel dose relative to conventional dose in an Asian all-comers PCI population presenting with ACS. Approximately 3400 patients will undergo prospective, random assignment separately to either stent or prasugrel arm (1:1 ratio, respectively). When the patients have contraindications to prasugrel, they are categorized into an antiplatelet observation group after stent-randomization. The primary endpoint is the patient-oriented composite outcome, which is a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction (MI), any repeat revascularization in the stent arm at 12 months after index PCI. In the prasugrel arm, primary endpoint is any major adverse cardiovascular event, which is a composite of all-cause mortality, any MI, any stent thrombosis (Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-defined), any repeat revascularization, stroke, or bleeding (BARC class ≥ 2).. The HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS RCT is the first study exploring the optimal maintenance dose of prasugrel beyond 1 month after PCI for ACS in Asian all-comers. In addition, this is the largest study dedicated only to ACS patients to evaluate the polymer issue in the situation of ACS by directly comparing biostable-polymer PtCr-EES versus BP-BES.. ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02193971, 13 July 2014).

Topics: Absorbable Implants; Acute Coronary Syndrome; Asian People; Cause of Death; Clinical Protocols; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymers; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Republic of Korea; Research Design; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In acute coronary syndromes (ACS), a dual antiplatelet regimen with an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist plus aspirin has become the cornerstone of treatment. The third-generation thienopyridine prasugrel and the cyclopentyl-triazolo-pyrimidine ticagrelor provide a greater, more rapid and consistent platelet inhibition compared to their predecessor clopidogrel. Based on their advantages over clopidogrel in two landmark studies, both drugs received a class I recommendation for their use in ACS patients with and without ST segment elevation. Due to differences in ACS populations and conditions investigated, the relative merits of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in the treatment of ACS patients with planned invasive strategy cannot be reliably estimated from independent trials. To date, no direct head-to-head comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel in terms of clinical outcome exists. The aim of this multicenter, randomized, open-label trial is to assess whether ticagrelor is superior to prasugrel in ACS patients with planned invasive strategy.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Clinical Protocols; Coronary Thrombosis; Drug Administration Schedule; Fibrinolytic Agents; Germany; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Research Design; Stents; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Time-to-Treatment; Treatment Outcome

In TRITON-TIMI 38, patients with acute coronary syndromes were treated with prasugrel or clopidogrel, with aspirin, for a median of 14.5 (maximum of 15) months. Based on this trial, the EU label for prasugrel recommends treatment for up to 12 months and excludes patients with prior stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). Furthermore, the EU label recommends the 10 mg maintenance dose (MD) for patients with body weight ≥60 kg and age <75 years. A lower MD of 5 mg is recommended for those with body weight <60 kg; although generally not recommended, 5 mg can be prescribed to patients ≥75 years after individual risk-benefit evaluation. This paper presents the one-year outcome data for this '10 mg indicated cohort'.. From the overall cohort of 13,608 patients in TRITON-TIMI 38, 10,804 fulfilled inclusion criteria for the 10 mg indicated cohort, of whom 22% had a history of diabetes, 73% an index diagnosis of unstable angina/non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI), and 27% an index diagnosis of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In this cohort at 12 months, those given prasugrel experienced significantly fewer ischemic events (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke, 7.8% vs 10.5%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.73, p < 0.001, than those given clopidogrel, with a non-significant increase in non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) TIMI major bleeding, 1.7% vs 1.5%, HR = 1.15, p = 0.40; similarly, in the overall cohort these frequencies were 9.4% vs 11.4%, HR = 0.81, p < 0.001, for cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke, and 2.2% vs 1.8%, HR = 1.24, p = 0.10, for non-CABG TIMI major bleeding. There was a significant reduction in stent thrombosis in the prasugrel group, with similar mortality rates and no excess of strokes.. Treatment with prasugrel according to EU label recommendations results in a significant 27% and 57% relative risk reduction (absolute risk reductions of 2.7% and 1.2%) in ischemic events and stent thromboses respectively compared with clopidogrel, with a 15% relative risk increase (absolute risk increase of 0.2%) for major bleeds (p = 0.40), and no excess of strokes.. Although restricted to 365 days of follow-up, this analysis encapsulates 1366 of 1424 (95.9%) of all primary endpoint events and 244 of 257 (94.9%) of all first non-CABG TIMI major bleeds reported in the pivotal manuscript. Furthermore, the 10 mg indicated cohort was not a pre-specified subgroup in the study protocol, but due to European labeling restrictions, results for all outcomes in this cohort are presented through 12 months.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Bypass; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Assessment; Stents; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine

Treatment with prasugrel and aspirin improves outcomes compared with clopidogrel and aspirin for patients with acute coronary syndrome who have had angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention; however, no clear benefit has been shown for patients managed first with drugs only. We assessed outcomes from the TRILOGY ACS trial based on whether or not patients had coronary angiography before treatment was chosen.. TRILOGY ACS (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00699998) was a randomised controlled trial, done at more than 800 sites worldwide. Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome who were selected for management without [corrected] revascularisation were randomly assigned to clopidogrel or prasugrel.The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 30 months. In the present analysis we assessed differences in the primary endpoint by angiography status and whether the effects of treatment on the primary endpoint differed between patients who had angiography before enrolment and those who had not.. 7243 patients younger than 75 years were included in the TRILOGY ACS primary analysis. 3085 (43%) had angiography at baseline, 4158 (57%) had not. Fewer patients who had angiography reached the primary endpoint at 30 months compared with those who did not have angiography, according to Kaplan-Meier analysis (281/3085 [12·8%] vs 480/4158 [16·5%], adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·63, 95% CI 0·53-0·75; p<0·0001). The proportion of patients who reached the primary endpoint was lower in the prasugrel group than in the clopidogrel group for those who had angiography (122/1524 [10·7%] vs 159/1561 [14·9%], HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·61-0·98; p=0·032) but did not differ between groups in patients who did not have angiography (242/2096 [16·3%] vs 238/2062 [16·7%], HR 1·01, 0·84-1·20; p=0·94; pinteraction=0·08). Overall, TIMI major bleeding and GUSTO severe bleeding were rare. Bleeding outcomes tended to be higher with prasugrel but did not differ significantly between treatment groups in either angiography cohort.. Among patients who had angiography who took prasugrel there were fewer cardiovascular deaths, myocardial infarctions, or strokes than in those who took clopidogrel. This result needs to be corroborated, but it is consistent with previous trials of more versus less intensive antiplatelet treatment. When angiography is done for acute coronary syndrome and anatomic coronary disease confirmed, the benefits and risks of intensive antiplatelet treatment exist whether the patient is treated with drugs or percutaneous coronary intervention.. Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to evaluate the clinical relevance of potential clopidogrel drug-drug interactions.. Some studies have demonstrated that statins and calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) may attenuate the pharmacodynamic effects of clopidogrel.. The TRITON-TIMI 38 (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38) enrolled 13,608 patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and planned percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and randomized them to clopidogrel or prasugrel. Use of a statin or CCB was left to the discretion of the treating physician. A multivariable Cox model with propensity score was employed to evaluate the association between statin or CCB use and clinical outcomes.. Of the 6,795 subjects assigned to clopidogrel, 4,794 (70.6%) were on a CYP3A4-metabolized statin, and 966 (14.2%) were on a CCB at randomization. The risk of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke was similar regardless of baseline use of statins (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85 to 1.22) or CCBs (adjusted HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.43) in clopidogrel-treated patients. Further, the combined use of a CCB and atorvastatin 80 mg daily (adjusted HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.84), or a CCB, statin, and proton pump inhibitor (adjusted HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.54) were not associated with an increased risk of CV death, MI, or stroke. The use of statins or CCBs did not modify the relative efficacy of prasugrel versus clopidogrel for the primary endpoint (p for interaction = 0.43, 0.55, respectively).. In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, the use of statins or CCBs was not associated with an increased risk of CV events in clopidogrel-treated patients. Consistent results were observed when the drugs were administered alone, together, or in combination with proton pump inhibitors.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Calcium Channel Blockers; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

On average, acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel experience fewer ischemic complications, but more bleeding, than those receiving clopidogrel. However, heterogeneity in treatment effects can alter the likelihood of benefits and risks of an individual patient. We developed predictive models of the benefits (reduced ischemic events) and risks (increased bleeding) to support targeting prasugrel to those who benefit most from treatment.. Using 12 579 patients from Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38), we fit risk models for ischemic events (cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, stroke) and bleeding (TIMI major/minor) over a 14.8-month follow-up and then calculated each patient's predicted risk for major ischemia and bleeding with both prasugrel and clopidogrel. We found substantial heterogeneity of the treatment effect of prasugrel (mean absolute reduction in the ischemia risk with prasugrel=1.5±3.0%, ranging from an 8.4% increased risk to a 31.2% reduction in risk for ischemia compared with clopidogrel). The mean absolute increase in the bleeding risk with prasugrel versus clopidogrel was 1.3±1.4% and ranged from a 7.9% lower risk to an 11.2% higher risk with prasugrel. The ratio of the difference in predicted ischemia risk/difference in predicted bleeding risk between prasugrel and clopidogrel was calculated for each patient to identify the proportion likely to benefit from prasugrel. Considering both ischemia and bleeding risk, a large proportion of TRITON participants (42%) were predicted to experience net benefit with prasugrel, a rate that increased if patients more strongly preferred avoiding ischemic events than bleeding.. The expected benefits and risks of prasugrel versus clopidogrel depend highly on patient characteristics. The use of risk models could support individualized thienopyridine selection to maximize the benefits and safety of these drugs.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The effect of intensified platelet inhibition for patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation who do not undergo revascularization has not been delineated.. In this double-blind, randomized trial, in a primary analysis involving 7243 patients under the age of 75 years receiving aspirin, we evaluated up to 30 months of treatment with prasugrel (10 mg daily) versus clopidogrel (75 mg daily). In a secondary analysis involving 2083 patients 75 years of age or older, we evaluated 5 mg of prasugrel versus 75 mg of clopidogrel.. At a median follow-up of 17 months, the primary end point of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke among patients under the age of 75 years occurred in 13.9% of the prasugrel group and 16.0% of the clopidogrel group (hazard ratio in the prasugrel group, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.05; P=0.21). Similar results were observed in the overall population. The prespecified analysis of multiple recurrent ischemic events (all components of the primary end point) suggested a lower risk for prasugrel among patients under the age of 75 years (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.00; P=0.04). Rates of severe and intracranial bleeding were similar in the two groups in all age groups. There was no significant between-group difference in the frequency of nonhemorrhagic serious adverse events, except for a higher frequency of heart failure in the clopidogrel group.. Among patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation, prasugrel did not significantly reduce the frequency of the primary end point, as compared with clopidogrel, and similar risks of bleeding were observed. (Funded by Eli Lilly and Daiichi Sankyo; TRILOGY ACS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00699998.).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine

The relationship of platelet function testing measurements with outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) initially managed medically without revascularization is unknown.. To characterize the differences and evaluate clinical outcomes associated with platelet reactivity among patients with ACS treated with clopidogrel or prasugrel.. Patients with medically managed unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were enrolled in the TRILOGY ACS trial (2008 to 2011) comparing clopidogrel vs prasugrel. Of 9326 participants, 27.5% were included in a platelet function substudy: 1286 treated with prasugrel and 1278 treated with clopidogrel.. Aspirin with either prasugrel (10 or 5 mg/d) or clopidogrel (75 mg/d); those 75 years or older and younger than 75 years but who weighed less than 60 kg received a 5-mg prasugrel maintenance dose.. Platelet reactivity, measured in P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs), was performed at baseline, at 2 hours, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after randomization. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke through 30 months.. Among participants younger than 75 years and weighing 60 kg or more, the median PRU values at 30 days were 64 (interquartile range [IQR], 33-128) in the prasugrel group vs 200 (IQR, 141-260) in the clopidogrel group (P < .001), a difference that persisted through all subsequent time points. For participants younger than 75 years and weighing less than 60 kg, the median 30-day PRU values were 139 (IQR, 86-203) for the prasugrel group vs 209 (IQR, 148-283) for the clopidogrel group (P < .001), and for participants 75 years or older, the median PRU values were 164 (IQR, 105-216) for the prasugrel group vs 222 (IQR, 148-268) for the clopidogrel group (P < .001). At 30 months the rate of the primary efficacy end point was 17.2% (160 events) in the prasugrel group vs 18.9% (180 events) in the clopidogrel group (P = .29). There were no significant differences in the continuous distributions of 30-day PRU values for participants with a primary efficacy end point event after 30 days (n = 214) compared with participants without an event (n = 1794; P = .07) and no significant relationship between the occurence of the primary efficacy end point and continuous PRU values (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for increase of 60 PRUs, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96-1.11; P = .44). Similar findings were observed with 30-day PRU cut points used to define high on-treatment platelet reactivity-PRU more than 208 (adjusted HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.89-1.52, P = .28) and PRU more than 230 (adjusted HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.90-1.61; P = .21).. Among patients with ACS without ST-segment elevation and initially managed without revascularization, prasugrel was associated with lower platelet reactivity than clopidogrel, irrespective of age, weight, and dose. Among those in the platelet substudy, no significant differences existed between prasugrel vs clopidogrel in the occurence of the primary efficacy end point through 30 months and no significant association existed between platelet reactivity and occurrence of ischemic outcomes.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00699998.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Aspirin; Body Weight; Clopidogrel; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia; Piperazines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of prasugrel and clopidogrel in the setting of a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor.. Prasugrel reduced cardiovascular events as compared with clopidogrel in TRITON-TIMI 38 (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38) but with increased bleeding.. Researchers in the TRITON-TIMI 38 randomized 13,608 subjects with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to prasugrel versus clopidogrel. The use of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was at the physician's discretion. For the current analysis, end points were examined at 30 days and were stratified by use of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor.. A total of 7,414 subjects (54.5%) received a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor during their index hospitalization. There was a consistent benefit of prasugrel over clopidogrel for reducing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients who did (hazard ratio: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.64 to 0.90) or did not receive a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (hazard ratio: 0.78; 95% confidence interval: 0.63 to 0.97, p(interaction) = 0.83). Prasugrel significantly reduced myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and stent thrombosis irrespective of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use. Although subjects treated with a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor had greater rates of bleeding, the risk of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major or minor bleeding with prasugrel versus clopidogrel was not significantly different in patients who were or were not treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (p(interaction) = 0.19).. Prasugrel significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention regardless of whether or not a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor is used. The use of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor does not accentuate the relative risk of bleeding with prasugrel as compared with clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Stents; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Stents; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

In the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial, greater platelet inhibition with prasugrel reduced the first occurrence of the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke) compared with clopidogrel in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing planned percutaneous coronary intervention. We hypothesized that prasugrel would reduce not only first events but also recurrent primary endpoint events and therefore total events compared with clopidogrel.. Poisson regression analysis was performed to compare the number of occurrences of the primary endpoint between prasugrel and clopidogrel in TRITON-TIMI 38. Landmark analytic methods were used to evaluate the risk of a recurrent primary endpoint event following an initial non-fatal endpoint event. Among patients with an initial non-fatal event, second events were significantly reduced with prasugrel compared to clopidogrel (10.8 vs. 15.4%, HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.92; P = 0.016), as was CV death following the non-fatal event (3.7 vs. 7.1%, HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.82; P = 0.008). Overall there was a reduction of 195 total primary efficacy events with prasugrel vs. clopidogrel (rate ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.87; P < 0.001). Recurrent bleeding events occurred infrequently (TIMI major non-CABG bleeds: four with prasugrel and two with clopidogrel). Study drug discontinuation was frequent following the initial major bleeding event (42% of patients discontinued study drug).. While standard statistical analytic techniques for clinical trials censor patients who experience a component of the primary composite endpoint, total cardiovascular events remain important to both patients and clinicians. Prasugrel, a more potent anti-platelet agent, reduced both first and subsequent cardiovascular events compared with clopidogrel in patients with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Dual-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine is a cornerstone of treatment to prevent thrombotic complications of acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention.. To compare prasugrel, a new thienopyridine, with clopidogrel, we randomly assigned 13,608 patients with moderate-to-high-risk acute coronary syndromes with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention to receive prasugrel (a 60-mg loading dose and a 10-mg daily maintenance dose) or clopidogrel (a 300-mg loading dose and a 75-mg daily maintenance dose), for 6 to 15 months. The primary efficacy end point was death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. The key safety end point was major bleeding.. The primary efficacy end point occurred in 12.1% of patients receiving clopidogrel and 9.9% of patients receiving prasugrel (hazard ratio for prasugrel vs. clopidogrel, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.90; P<0.001). We also found significant reductions in the prasugrel group in the rates of myocardial infarction (9.7% for clopidogrel vs. 7.4% for prasugrel; P<0.001), urgent target-vessel revascularization (3.7% vs. 2.5%; P<0.001), and stent thrombosis (2.4% vs. 1.1%; P<0.001). Major bleeding was observed in 2.4% of patients receiving prasugrel and in 1.8% of patients receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.68; P=0.03). Also greater in the prasugrel group was the rate of life-threatening bleeding (1.4% vs. 0.9%; P=0.01), including nonfatal bleeding (1.1% vs. 0.9%; hazard ratio, 1.25; P=0.23) and fatal bleeding (0.4% vs. 0.1%; P=0.002).. In patients with acute coronary syndromes with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention, prasugrel therapy was associated with significantly reduced rates of ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, but with an increased risk of major bleeding, including fatal bleeding. Overall mortality did not differ significantly between treatment groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00097591 [ClinicalTrials.gov].)

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prodrugs; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thrombotic Stroke; Treatment Outcome

To assess, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous intervention, the pace of introduction in clinical practice (2010-2017) of drug-eluting stents (DES), ticagrelor, prasugrel, and prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration, and their potential impact on the risk of 2-year outcomes.. Prospective and exhaustive community-wide cohort of 14 841 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention between 2010 and 2017. Index episodes were obtained from the Catalan Codi IAM Registry, events during follow-up from the Minimum Data Set and DAPT were defined by pharmacy dispensation. Follow-up was 24 months. The temporal trend for exposures and outcomes was assessed using regression models.. Age> 65 years, diabetes, renal failure, previous heart failure, and need for anticoagulation at discharge were more frequent in later periods (P <.001). From 2010 to 2017, the use of DES increased from 31.1% to 69.8%, ticagrelor from 0.1% to 28.6%, prasugrel from 1.5% to 23.8%, and the median consecutive months on DAPT from 2 to 10 (P <.001 for all). Adjusted analysis showed a temporal trend to a lower risk of the main outcome over time: the composite of death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke and repeat revascularization (absolute odds reduction 0.005% each quarter; OR, 0.995; 95%CI, 0.99-0.999; P=.028). The odds of all individual components except stroke were reduced, although significance was only reached for revascularization.. Despite a strong increase between 2010 and 2017 in the use and duration of DAPT and the use of ticagrelor, prasugrel and DES, there was no substantial reduction in major cardiovascular outcomes.

Topics: Aged; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Stroke after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can be devastating. It is uncertain whether the risks of ischaemic stroke or intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) are associated with different choices of P2Y12 inhibitors (potent P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor and prasugrel vs clopidogrel). Even though East Asians are known to have different thrombotic and haemorrhagic profiles from Caucasians, data on Chinese patients are sparse.. This was a retrospective cohort study conducting in Chinese patients with ACS who underwent first-ever percutaneous coronary intervention from 14 hospitals in Hong Kong between 2010 and 2017. The primary efficacy endpoint was ischaemic stroke. The secondary efficacy endpoint was a composite outcome of thrombotic events including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke. The primary safety endpoint was ICH. The secondary safety endpoint was a composite of major bleeding events.. After adjustment of baseline characteristics by 1:1 propensity score matching, a total of 6220 patients (3110 on each group) were analysed. Compared with clopidogrel, potent P2Y12 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of ischaemic stroke (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.87; p=0.008) and a lower risk of thrombotic events (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.90; p=0.001). Potent P2Y12 inhibitor was associated with similar risk of ICH (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.25, p=0.20) and major bleeding (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.01, p=0.069).. Potent P2Y12 inhibitors were associated with a lower adjusted risk of ischaemic stroke and thrombotic events, compared with clopidogrel. The risks of ICH and major bleeding were similar.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Brain Ischemia; China; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Hemorrhagic Stroke; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Ticagrelor

The recent approval of prasugrel will expand the choice of medical treatment. Prasugrel, as a platelet inhibitor, was approved for the management of cardiovascular events (including stent thrombosis) in patients with acute coronary syndrome in 2009. In 2021, it was also approved for use in patients with ischemic stroke. However, there have been cases of patients showing resistance to medical treatment and, therefore, worsening symptoms. It is important to approach treatment while considering the next step. Physicians should be aware of medical treatment choices, including the use of antiplatelet drugs, as well as the appropriate timing to shift to surgical treatment when necessary. In this paper, clinical practice options and guidelines will be considered.

Topics: Atherosclerosis; Cerebral Arteries; Cerebral Infarction; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Potent P2Y. The authors compared the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in a real-world contemporary PCI cohort.. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI between 2014 and 2019 discharged on either prasugrel or ticagrelor were included from the prospectively collected institutional PCI registry. Primary endpoint was the composite of death and myocardial infarction (MI), with secondary outcomes including rates of bleeding, stroke, and target vessel revascularization at 1 year.. Overall, 3,858 patients were included in the study (ticagrelor: n = 2,771; prasugrel: n = 1,087), and a majority (48.4%) underwent PCI in the context of CCS. Patients prescribed ticagrelor were more likely to be female, have a history of cerebrovascular disease, and have ACS presentation, while those receiving prasugrel were more likely to be White with a higher prevalence of prior revascularization. No difference in the risk of death or MI was noted across the groups (ticagrelor vs prasugrel: 3.3% vs 3.1%; HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.54-1.43; P = 0.59). Rates of target vessel revascularization were significantly lower in the ticagrelor cohort (9.3% vs 14.0%; adjusted HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55-0.91; P = 0.007) with no differences in stroke or bleeding. The results were consistent in patients with CCS (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.46-1.54) and ACS (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.46-1.54), without evidence of interaction (P = 0.37), and confirmed across multivariable adjustment and propensity score stratification analysis.. In this contemporary patient population undergoing PCI, prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with similar 1-year efficacy and safety.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Female; Humans; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

The comparative efficacy and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the association of treatment with clinical outcomes.. In the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for enhancement and development of evidence-based care in heart disease evaluated according to recommended therapies) registry, all patients with MI treated with PCI and discharged on prasugrel or ticagrelor from 2010 to 2016 were included. Outcomes were 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, death, MI or stroke), individual components and bleeding. Multivariable adjustment, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to adjust for confounders.. We included 37 990 patients, 2073 in the prasugrel group and 35 917 in the ticagrelor group. Patients in the prasugrel group were younger, more often admitted with ST elevation MI and more likely to have diabetes. Six to twelve months after discharge, 20% of patients in each group discontinued the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor they received at discharge. The risk for MACCE did not significantly differ between prasugrel-treated and ticagrelor-treated patients (adjusted HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.24). We found no significant difference in the adjusted risk for death, recurrent MI or stroke alone between the two treatments. There was no significant difference in the risk for bleeding with prasugrel versus ticagrelor (2.5% vs 3.2%, adjusted HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.22). IPTW and PSM analyses confirmed the results.. In patients with MI treated with PCI, prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with similar efficacy and safety during 1-year follow-up.

Topics: Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Discharge; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Sweden; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Observational studies comparing ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have yielded contradictory results, but these studies often did not consider differential censoring (eg, for treatment switching or insurance disenrollment) or confounding by time-dependent factors.. Our objective was to conduct a comparative effectiveness and safety analysis of ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients who underwent PCI after being hospitalized for an ACS.. This study used the Optum's de-identified Clinformatics. Included in the analysis were 2559 patients initiated on ticagrelor and 4456 patients initiated on prasugrel following PCI. Patients initiated on ticagrelor were 10% more likely to have eligibility disenrollment (Ticagrelor: 57%, Prasugrel: 47%, p < 0.01) and 7 percentage-points more likely to switch medication (Ticagrelor: 35%, Prasugrel: 28%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for multiple factors, including time-varying exposure and censoring imbalance, ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death, MI, or stroke when compared to prasugrel (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.33; 95% CI: 1.04-1.68). Similarly, ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk in bleeding events when compared with prasugrel (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.19-2.17).. When compared with ticagrelor, prasugrel use following PCI for ACS was associated with a lower risk of death, MI, or stroke, as well as a reduced risk of major bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Patients on dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention often have indications for concomitant oral anticoagulation, known as triple antithrombotic therapy. Majority of literature evaluating triple antithrombotic therapy fails to adequately represent patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and those prescribed potent P2Y12 inhibitors, ticagrelor or prasugrel. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of triple antithrombotic regimens containing ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort trial. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical event, defined as the primary efficacy endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident and the primary safety endpoint of any bleeding event.. Between October 2017 and October 2019, a total of 65 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were initiated on triple therapy. Forty-six patients were included in the primary analysis, of which 26 were discharged on triple antithrombotic therapy with clopidogrel and 20 discharged on potent P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor or prasugrel). The primary endpoint occurred in 27% of the clopidogrel group and 40% of the potent P2Y12 inhibitor group (. This small cohort study suggests, in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the net adverse clinical event rate does not differ between clopidogrel and potent P2Y12 inhibitors in the setting of triple antithrombotic therapy. The results of this exploratory analysis warrant confirmation in a larger, randomized study.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Massachusetts; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticagrelor

A patient undergoes intracranial stent insertion for stent-assisted coiling of a basilar tip aneurysm and left middle cerebral artery aneurysm. A flow diverting stent is also placed across an anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Prior to the procedure, the patient takes dual antiplatelet medications, being aspirin and clopidogrel. Because of the concern regarding in-stent thrombus and thromboembolic complications related to intracranial stenting and the high rate of clopidogrel resistance, preoperative platelet function testing (PFT) was undertaken to ensure platelet inhibition. In this case, PFT was performed on a platelet function analyser which demonstrated platelet inhibition. Ten days following the procedure, the patient represented with thromboembolic stroke. Repeat PFT performed with whole blood impedance aggregometry and despite full medication compliance demonstrated clopidogrel resistance. Clopidogrel was then ceased and prasugrel commenced. This case demonstrates the importance of appropriate platelet inhibition in patients with intracranial stents and the controversy surrounding PFT.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug Resistance; Humans; Intracranial Aneurysm; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Preoperative Care; Stents; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Withholding Treatment

Prasugrel was approved at a lower dose in 2014 in Japan than in the West because East Asian patients are considered more susceptible to bleeding than Western patients. However, real-world outcomes with low-dose prasugrel treatment remain unclear.. To investigate the association of low-dose prasugrel vs standard-dose clopidogrel administration with short-term outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. This study used data from the Japan Cardiovascular Database-Keio Interhospital Cardiovascular Studies registry, a large, ongoing, multicenter, retrospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent PCI. The present cohort study evaluated 2770 patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent PCI and received either low-dose prasugrel (loading dose, 20 mg; maintenance dose, 3.75 mg) or clopidogrel (loading dose, 300 mg; maintenance dose, 75 mg) in combination with aspirin between 2014 and 2018. Propensity score-matching analysis was conducted to balance the baseline characteristics of patients receiving low-dose prasugrel and those receiving clopidogrel. Data analysis was conducted in June 2019.. Prescription of either low-dose prasugrel or standard-dose clopidogrel prior to PCI.. Primary ischemic events (in-hospital death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke) and primary bleeding events, defined as bleeding complications within 72 hours after PCI consistent with the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry definition.. Of 2559 patients included in the study, the mean (SD) age was 67.8 (12.7) years, and 78.2% were male. In total, 1297 patients (50.7%) received low-dose prasugrel, and 1262 patients (49.3%) received clopidogrel. After propensity score matching, primary ischemic events among patients receiving low-dose prasugrel and those receiving clopidogrel were comparable (odds ratio [OR], 1.42; 95% CI, 0.90-2.23), but primary bleeding events were significantly higher among patients receiving prasugrel (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.63-5.18). This increase in bleeding events was associated with the presence of a profile of high-bleeding risk (≥75 years of age, body weight <60 kg, or history of stroke or transient ischemic attack) (OR, 4.08; 95% CI, 1.86-8.97), being female (OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.05-14.0), or the presence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.05-4.09) or chronic kidney disease (OR, 4.78; 95% CI, 1.95-11.7).. Since its approval, low-dose prasugrel has been used by nearly 80% of patients who undergo PCI. Despite the modified dose, bleeding events were higher among patients receiving low-dose prasugrel than among patients receiving clopidogrel, with no difference in ischemic events between the 2 groups. These results suggest the importance of a risk assessment of bleeding prior to selecting a P2Y12 inhibitor, even for the use of a lower approved dose, when treating patients of East Asian descent.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Brain Ischemia; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Death; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Registries; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Stroke

To investigate the long-term clinical benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy with potent P2Y12 inhibitors compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. In this prospective multicenter observational study, we enrolled 708 patients with ACS treated with clopidogrel (n = 137), ticagrelor (n = 260) or prasugrel (n = 311). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE; over 1 year) and long-term mortality (median: 5.6 years; interquartile range [IQR] 4.9-6.5 years) were assessed. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) was used to measure adenosine diphosphate (ADP)- and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation.. Type of P2Y12 inhibitor emerged as an independent predictor of long-term mortality and MACE: patients treated with potent platelet inhibitors prasugrel or ticagrelor were at lower risk for long-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.22-0.92; P = .028) or MACE (adjusted HR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.20-0.73; P = .004) than those treated with clopidogrel independent from clinical risk factors. In contrast, the efficacy of clopidogrel decreased with increasing severity of ACS: platelet aggregation was 37% higher in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 25% higher in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) compared to patients with unstable angina (P = .039). Patients with diabetes achieved less potent ADP- and AA-induced platelet inhibition under clopidogrel, compared to patients without diabetes (P = .045; P = .030, respectively).. In the setting of ACS, treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel reduced long-term mortality and 1-year MACE as compared to clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine Diphosphate; Aged; Arachidonic Acid; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Survival Rate; Ticagrelor

The association between cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotypes and adverse events in patients treated with clopidogrel or prasugrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Japanese population is unclear.Methods and Results:This study consisted of 1,580 patients whoseCYP2C19genotypes were assessed at Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital, and 193 clopidogrel-treated and 217 prasugrel-treated patients who were followed more than 1 year after receiving PCI were analyzed. Among 1,580 patients, the prevalence of normal, intermediate, and poor metabolizers was 32%, 49%, and 17%, respectively. Overall incidence of the primary outcome, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, ischemic stroke, or major bleeding was not significantly different between the clopidogrel and prasugrel groups (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-4.61, P=0.12). Among patients with theCYP2C19loss-of-function (LOF) allele, however, the incidence of the primary outcome was significantly higher in the clopidogrel group (adjusted HR 3.19, 95% CI 1.10-9.24, P=0.03), whereas no difference was observed among patients without theCYP2C19LOF allele (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.14-3.26, P=0.62).. Among patients with theCYP2C19LOF allele, the use of clopidogrel was significantly associated with increased adverse events. Thus, further investigation is needed to establish the practical use ofCYP2C19genotyping.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alleles; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Loss of Function Mutation; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this study is to examine the temporal trend of antiplatelet prescribing pattern during index hospitalisation discharge in Hong Kong (HK) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population.. The study is a retrospective observational cohort study.. The study retrieved data from electronic health record from Hospital Authority (HA), HK.. The study included patients aged 18 years old or above, who were admitted to seven institutions under HA with diagnosis of ACS during 2008-2017.. The primary outcome was the frequency of antiplatelet therapy prescription at the point of index hospitalisation discharge each year during 2008-2017. Association between demographics, baseline comorbidities, procedures and antiplatelet prescription were examined as secondary outcome using multivariate logistic regression model, with commonly used antiplatelet groups selected for comparison.. Among the included 14 716 patients, 5888 (40.0%) discharged with aspirin alone, 6888 (46.8%) discharged with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel, and 973 (6.6%) discharged with DAPT with prasugrel/ticagrelor. Prescribing rate of aspirin alone decreased substantially from 56.8% in 2008 to 27.5% in 2017. Utilisation of DAPT with clopidogrel increased from 33.7% in 2008 to 52.7% in 2017. Use of DAPT with prasugrel/ticagrelor increased from 0.3% in 2010 to 15.3% in 2017. Compared with those prescribed with DAPT with clopidogrel, male patients (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.34, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.65), patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (aOR 2.50, 1.98 to 3.16) or ST-elevation myocardial infarction (aOR 3.26, 2.59 to 4.09), use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (aOR 3.03, 2.48 to 3.68) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (aOR 3.85, 3.24 to 4.58) or coronary artery bypass graft (aOR 6.52, 4.63 to 9.18) during index hospitalisation, concurrent use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists (aOR 1.35, 1.10 to 1.65) or proton pump inhibitors (aOR 3.57, 2.93 to 4.36) during index hospitalisation discharge were more likely to be prescribed with DAPT with prasugrel/ticagrelor. Patients with older age (aOR 0.97, 0.96 to 0.97), diabetes (aOR 0.68, 0.52 to 0.88), chronic kidney disease (aOR 0.43, 0.22 to 0.85) or concurrent use of oral anticoagulant (aOR 0.16, 0.07 to 0.42) were more likely to received DAPT with clopidogrel.. Use of DAPT with prasugrel/ticagrelor was suboptimal yet improving during 2008-2017 in HK patients with ACS. Considering DAPT, predictors for clopidogrel prescription, compared with prasugrel/ticagrelor, were consistent with identified risk factors of bleeding.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Brain Ischemia; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hong Kong; Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone of treatment following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Recently, prasugrel, a new and potent antiplatelet agent, has been introduced in clinical practice. To date, however, real-world in-hospital and follow-up data in Japanese patients with AMI remain limited.. To examine ischemic and bleeding events in Japanese patients with AMI and the association between these events and antiplatelet therapy.. The Japan AMI Registry (JAMIR) is a multicenter, nationwide, prospective registry enrolling patients with AMI from 50 institutions. The inclusion criterion is spontaneous onset of AMI diagnosed based on either the universal definition or Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular disease (MONICA) criteria. The major exclusion criteria are hospital admission ≥ 24 h after onset, no return of spontaneous circulation on admission following out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest, and AMI as a complication of percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting. The primary end point of the study is the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. Major safety end points include major bleeding based on Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria and type 3 or type 5 bleeding based on Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria. Between December 2015 and May 2017, a total of 3411 patients (mean age 68.1 ± 13.2 years, 23.4% female) were enrolled in the study. Patients will be followed for 1 year.. JAMIR will provide important information regarding contemporary practice patterns in the management of Japanese patients with AMI, their demographic and clinical characteristics, in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes, and how they are related to antiplatelet therapy.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Coronary Angiography; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Registries; Research Design; Risk Factors; Stents; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Potent P2Y12 blockers are preferred in patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the risk of bleeding remains a major concern. We assessed the association of potent P2Y12 blockers with ischemic and bleeding outcomes in patients with NSTEMI.. From the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health database, 4927 patients with NSTEMI receiving drug-eluting stents (DES) were divided into potent P2Y12 blocker (ticagrelor or prasugrel, n=901) and clopidogrel (n=3180) groups. Propensity-matched 12-month ischemic and bleeding events were compared. Patients who received anticoagulants or who discontinued P2Y12 blockers or switched between potent P2Y12 blockers and clopidogrel were excluded.. In the overall population, patients at higher ischemic and bleeding risks more often received clopidogrel. After propensity matching (n=901 in each group), 12-month rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were lower (7.3% vs. 10.1%, p=0.038), but Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major or minor bleeding rates were higher (5.9% vs. 2.2%, p<0.001) with potent P2Y12 blockers. Twelve-month rates of death from any cause, MI, stroke, or TIMI major bleeding were not different. On multivariate analysis, 12-month risk of TIMI major or minor bleeding was higher with B2 or C lesion, potent P2Y12 blocker use, body weight <60kg, and lower with time to PCI <12h and radial artery access.. In patients with NSTEMI receiving DES, potent P2Y12 blockers were associated with reduced ischemic but increased bleeding risk with similar net clinical benefits.

Topics: Aged; Clopidogrel; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Republic of Korea; Stroke; Ticagrelor

To investigate the use of prasugrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in African American (AA) patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).. AA patients are at higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes after PCI and may derive greater benefit from the use of potent antiplatelet therapy.. Using the multicenter PROMETHEUS observational registry of ACS patients treated with PCI, we grouped patients by self-reported AA or other races. Clinical outcomes at 90-day and 1-year included non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), major adverse cardiac events (composite of death, MI, stroke, or unplanned revascularization) and major bleeding.. The study population included 2,125 (11%) AA and 17,707 (89%) non-AA patients. AA patients were younger, more often female (46% vs. 30%) with a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and prior coronary intervention than non-AA patients. Although AA patients more often presented with troponin (+) ACS, prasugrel use was much less common in AA vs. non-AA (11.9% vs. 21.4%, respectively, P = 0.001). In addition, the use of prasugrel increased with the severity of presentation in non-AA but not in AA patients. Multivariable logistic regression showed AA race was an independent predictor of reduced use of prasugrel (0.42 [0.37-0.49], P < 0.0001). AA race was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of MI at 90-days and 1 year after PCI.. Despite higher risk clinical presentation and worse 1-year ischemic outcomes, AA race was an independent predictor of lower prasugrel prescription in a contemporary population of ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Black or African American; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Female; Health Status Disparities; Healthcare Disparities; Hemorrhage; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Race Factors; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Topics: Brain Ischemia; Clopidogrel; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticlopidine

Although it has been reported that prasugrel achieves stronger antiplatelet effect and fewer cardiovascular events compared to clopidogrel in Japanese patients, there are limited data comparing the safety between the 2 dose regimens. Data from 1031 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI at 5 institutions from May 2014 to April 2016, who received aspirin plus either clopidogrel (619 patients) or prasugrel (412 patients), were retrospectively analyzed. The choice of clopidogrel or prasugrel was left to the operator's discretion. Adverse events were defined as a composite of bleeding, hepatopathy, leukopenia, thrombopenia, exanthema, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). MACE was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal ischemic stroke. The average follow-up period was 143 days in the prasugrel group and 263 days in the clopidogrel group. Adverse events occurred in 34.5% of patients in the prasugrel group and in 28.6% in the clopidogrel group. Although the Kaplan-Meier curves showed lower survival rates from MACE, all-bleeding, major bleeding, minor bleeding, and adverse events, in the prasugrel group compared to the clopidogrel group (log rank test p = 0.009, p = 0.001, p = 0.012, p = 0.018, and p < 0.001, respectively), multivariate Cox-regression analyses determined prasugrel as a significant risk factor for all-bleeding, minor bleeding, and adverse events, but not for MACE and major bleeding events. Dual antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel was independently associated with minor bleeding events, but not with MACE and major bleeding events, compared to clopidogrel, after PCI in common clinical settings.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) (stroke, peripheral arterial disease [PAD] or coronary artery disease [CAD]) are at high risk of serious events and mortality. Current clinical guidelines recommend new antiplatelet drugs (NADs) for high cardiovascular risk patients with ACS; however, these drugs are underused in different scenarios.. This study included 1717 ACS patients from 3 tertiary hospitals. Of them, 641 (37.33%) suffered from previous CVD: 149 patients with stroke, 154 patients with PAD and 541 patients with CAD. Bleeding, mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year of follow-up after hospital discharge were analyzed.. NADs administration during hospital stay and at discharge was less frequent in patients with previous CVDs (P<0.001, for both). Cox analysis in this cohort of patients showed that clopidogrel prescription at discharge was independently associated with MACEs (HR: 1.59 [95% CI: 1.03-2.45]; P=0.036) and with death (HR: 1.99 [95% CI: 1.00-3.98]; P=0.049) in multivariate analysis. More specifically, when ticagrelor prescription at discharge was compared with clopidogrel, a significant death reduction was found in both, the univariate and the multivariate Cox analysis (HR: 4.54 [95% CI: 2.26-9.13]; P<0.001 and HR: 2.61 [95% CI: 1.16-5.90]; P=0.021, respectively).. New antiplatelet drugs, especially ticagrelor, showed lower rates of mortality in patients with CVD without differences for bleeding. Despite the recommendations of current clinical guidelines for high risk patients with ACS, the use of NADs is very low in "real-life" patients with previous CVD.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aftercare; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Coronary Disease; Drug Utilization; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Smoking; Spain; Stroke; Tertiary Care Centers; Ticagrelor

The POPular Risk Score was developed for the selective intensification of P2Y. In a single-center prospective cohort study, patients with a high risk score were treated with prasugrel and patients with a low risk score with clopidogrel. The risk score-guided cohort was compared with a historic cohort of clopidogrel-treated patients. The endpoint consisted of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis during 1 year of follow-up. TIMI major and minor bleeding events were also analyzed.. The guided cohort contained 1127 patients, 26.9% of whom were switched to prasugrel according to the POPular Risk Score. The historic cohort contained 893 patients. The incidence of the combined thrombotic endpoint was significantly lower in the guided cohort as compared with the historic cohort (8.4% versus 3.7%, p < 0.001). This strategy was safe with respect to bleeding (4.0% versus 1.3%, p < 0.001, for TIMI major or minor bleeding). Results were comparable after multivariate and propensity score matched and weighted analysis.. Selective intensification of P2Y

Topics: Aged; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Female; Genotype; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk; Stroke; Thrombosis

Antiplatelet therapy is the corner stone of treatment following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Prasugrel, a new and potent antiplatelet agent, was recently introduced to clinical practice. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with AMI treated with prasugrel with those treated with clopidogrel in real-world clinical practice in Japan.Methods and Results:The Japan AMI Registry (JAMIR) is a multicenter, nationwide, prospective registry enrolling patients with AMI from 50 institutes. Between December 2015 and May 2017, a total of 3,411 patients were enrolled. Among them, 3,069 patients were treated with either prasugrel (n=2,607) or clopidogrel (n=462) during hospitalization. Median follow-up period was 12 months. Prasugrel-treated patients were predominantly male, younger, more often showed ST-elevation AMI, and had fewer comorbidities. After adjustment using inverse probability of treatment weighting, the primary endpoint, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI and non-fatal stroke, was comparable between the prasugrel and clopidogrel groups (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.72), whereas the risk of major bleeding (BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding) was significantly lower in the prasugrel group (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99).. The present real-world database of the JAMIR demonstrated that the potent P2Y12-inhibitor prasugrel showed comparable rates of 1-year ischemic events to clopidogrel, but the risk of bleeding was lower with prasugrel than with clopidogrel.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Despite great advances with the introduction of ticagrelor and prasugrel in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), the risk of thrombosis and bleeding remains significant and affects the choice of clinicians in the treatment of the single patient. Large registries are effective tools to explore patterns of drug administration and adherence to guideline recommendations in real-world clinical practice.. START- antiplatelet is a prospective, observational registry carried out by seven Italian cardiology institutions on patients admitted for ACS aimed to document the real world treatment of ACS patients, adding also data on 12-month follow-up. We present data on the first 1050 patients who have completed 1-year follow-up on a total of 1537 patients. Primary end-points were: 1) MACCE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events) including all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, non fatal MI, urgent revascularization, TIA and ischemic stroke; 2) Major and minor bleeding according to TIMI, GUSTO and ISTH classifications.. The dual antiplatelet treatment most prescribed was aspirin plus ticagrelor (47.9%) and aspirin plus clopidogrel (32.1%). At a mean follow-up was 335±131 days, both ticagrelor and prasugrel are associated with a statistically significant reduced total and cardiovascular mortality. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor do not show a significant increased incidence of major and minor bleedings with respect to clopidogrel. Patients with monotherapy had significantly higher incidence of both ischemic stroke and major bleedings.. The analysis of the register has documented that both ticagrelor and prasugrel are associated with a statistically significant reduced total and cardiovascular mortality but both do not show a significant increased incidence of major and minor bleedings with respect to clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Background Prior reports indicate that the effect of P2Y

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angina, Unstable; Asian People; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Republic of Korea; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

We compared the clinical outcome of diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the GReek AntiPlatElet (GRAPE) registry.. GRAPE is a prospective observational study, focusing on contemporary antiplatelet use in moderate-risk to high-risk ACS patients receiving PCI. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), (composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and stroke) and bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition) at 1 year of follow-up were analyzed using propensity score adjustment. A subanalysis according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status was performed.. Out of 2047 registered patients, 469 (22.9%) were diabetic. Complete 1-year follow-up was available in 95.1% of patients. MACE occurred in 12.2 and 7.2% of those patients with and without DM, respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.27 (0.89-1.79), P=0.2]. Observed BARC type ≥3 bleeding risk was not higher in diabetic patients: adjusted HR (95% CI)=1.20 (0.79-1.84). In the subgroup of clopidogrel-treated patients (N=238), MACE rate was significantly higher in diabetic compared with nondiabetic cohort [13.4 vs. 9%, adjusted HR (95% CI)=1.68 (1.07-2.64), P=0.03]. In the subgroup of ticagrelor-treated or prasugrel-treated patients (N=228), MACE rate did not differ significantly between diabetic and nondiabetic patients: 9.6 versus 5%, adjusted HR (95% CI)=1.35 (0.77-2.37), P=0.38.. In 'real-life' ACS undergoing PCI, diabetic patients have higher - although not significantly - MACE rate and no difference in bleeding events. This difference in MACE was significant among clopidogrel-treated patients, whereas when newer antiplatelet agents were used the negative impact of DM on ischemic events was eliminated.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Greece; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Prasugrel, a novel P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is administered to patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but it can increase the risk of bleeding. The Japanese exhibit weaker responses to clopidogrel than other races because of CYP2C19 polymorphisms; thus, it is unclear whether these patients should continue dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using prasugrel or switch to clopidogrel in the chronic phase. Here we evaluated the clinical outcomes of DAPT guided by CYP2C19 polymorphisms after implantation of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) for ACS management. Patients with ACS receiving PCI via DES from November 2011 to March 2015 were divided into two groups: conventional DAPT with clopidogrel (n = 41) and gene-guided DAPT (n = 24). In the gene-guided DAPT group, all patients with ACS were given DAPT using prasugrel as soon as possible; extensive and intermediate metabolizers receiving PCI for the first time were switched to clopidogrel at least 2 weeks after discharge, and intermediate metabolizers with repeated ACS and poor metabolizers continued on DAPT using prasugrel. Notably, gene-guided DAPT significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (MACCEs; 22.0% versus 4.2%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.81; P = 0.0247). Hemorrhagic complications were observed in 3.1% of patients receiving conventional DAPT and absent in the gene-guided group. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that gene-guided DAPT significantly decreased MACCE incidence (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.01-0.81; P = 0.033). Collectively, these data suggest that CYP2C19 polymorphism analysis may improve treatment decisions in patients with ACS receiving DES-PCI.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; DNA; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Postoperative Complications; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Ticlopidine

Third-generation P2Y

Topics: Aged; Asia; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Incidence; Inpatients; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Registries; Republic of Korea; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Prasugrel and ticagrelor are recommended over clopidogrel in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In this registry analysis, we compared efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel P2Y12 inhibition in patients with STEMI. We included 318 patients in this single-center analysis. Twelve-month follow-up was conducted during ambulatory care at our department. Patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor or prasugrel during the follow-up period. Prescription of prasugrel or ticagrelor, respectively, was according to the preference of the treating physician. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) [death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and unplanned reintervention] and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) bleeding (major/minor) were registered during hospitalization and follow-up. TIMI bleeding events were more frequent in ticagrelor-treated patients [17 vs. 5 patients, hazard ratio (HR) 2.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-6.6; log-rank P value = 0.01]. Prasugrel-treated patients were significantly younger (ticagrelor 63 ± 12 years vs. prasugrel 57 ± 10; P < 0.0001). Besides that, patients' characteristics were similar in both groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that ticagrelor medication was independently associated with bleeding risk after adjustment for age, percutaneous coronary intervention approach (femoral vs. radial), diabetes mellitus, and kidney function (HR 3.01; 95% CI 1.0-7.4; P = 0.043). In patients treated with ticagrelor, 35 MACCE were detected. There was no difference as compared to prasugrel-treated patients (24 events, HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.79-2.09; log-rank P value = 0.41). TIMI bleeding events were more frequent in ticagrelor-treated patients with STEMI during 12-month follow-up. There were no differences in MACCE between groups in this registry analysis.

Topics: Aged; Aspirin; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Germany; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pilot Projects; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Registries; Risk Factors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Comparative outcomes of treatment with antiplatelet drugs in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and co-morbid diabetes mellitus (DM) are not well studied.. We performed a cohort study using US commercial claims data (2009-2015) and conducted the following pairwise comparisons in ACS patients with DM: prasugrel vs clopidogrel, ticagrelor vs clopidogrel, and prasugrel vs ticagrelor. Outcomes of interest included (1) a composite effectiveness endpoint including myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or inpatient mortality; (2) a composite safety endpoint including major bleeding events requiring hospitalization; and (3) pneumonia hospitalizations as a negative control endpoint. We used calendar time-specific propensity score matching to account for confounding and applied Cox proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).. Comparative risk of the effectiveness endpoint was lower among prasugrel initiators compared to clopidogrel initiators (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, N = 7011 matched pairs), but no different between ticagrelor and clopidogrel (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.76-1.37, N = 3013 pairs) or prasugrel and ticagrelor (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58-1.18, N = 2207 pairs). Bleeding risk was higher among prasugrel initiators when compared to clopidogrel initiators within the first month of treatment (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.03-3.35); no other comparison indicated any difference. No differences in the negative control outcomes were noted after PS matching for all comparisons, indicating adequate confounding control.. Prasugrel was associated with superior cardiovascular outcomes and a higher risk of short-term bleeding compared to clopidogrel in patients with ACS and DM. Comparative outcomes were similar between ticagrelor and clopidogrel or prasugrel and ticagrelor.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Comorbidity; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospital Mortality; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome; United States

Topics: Aspirin; Belgium; Clopidogrel; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to compare clinical outcomes in a contemporary acute coronary syndrome (ACS) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cohort stratified by chronic kidney disease (CKD) status.. Patients with CKD exhibit high risks for both thrombotic and bleeding events, thus complicating decision making regarding antiplatelet therapy in the setting of ACS.. The PROMETHEUS study was a multicenter observational study comparing outcomes with prasugrel versus clopidogrel in ACS PCI patients. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 90 days and at 1 year were defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned revascularization. Clinically significant bleeding was defined as bleeding requiring transfusion or hospitalization. Cox regression multivariable analysis was performed for adjusted associations between CKD status and clinical outcomes. Hazard ratios for prasugrel versus clopidogrel treatment were generated using propensity score stratification.. The total cohort included 19,832 patients, 28.3% with and 71.7% without CKD. CKD patients were older with greater comorbidities including diabetes and multivessel disease. Prasugrel was less often prescribed to CKD versus non-CKD patients (11.0% vs. 24.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). At 1 year, CKD was associated with higher adjusted risk of MACE (1.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 1.37) and bleeding (1.46; 95% confidence interval: 1.24 to 1.73). Although unadjusted rates of 1-year MACE were lower with prasugrel versus clopidogrel in both CKD (18.3% vs. 26.5%; p < 0.001) and non-CKD (10.9% vs. 17.9%; p < 0.001) patients, associations were attenuated after propensity stratification. Similarly, unadjusted differences in 1-year bleeding with prasugrel versus clopidogrel (6.0% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.18 in CKD patients; 2.6% vs. 3.5%; p = 0.008 in non-CKD patients) were not significant after propensity score adjustment.. Although risks for 1-year MACE were significantly higher in ACS PCI patients with versus without CKD, prasugrel use was 50% lower in patients with renal impairment. Irrespective of CKD status, outcomes associated with prasugrel use were not significant after propensity adjustment. These data highlight the need for randomized studies evaluating the optimal antiplatelet therapy in CKD patients with ACS.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Thrombosis; Databases, Factual; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

A mechanical aortic prosthesis (MAP) may cause platelet activation secondary to shear forces, and the release of adenosine diphosphate (ADP). This platelet-mediated event may lead to arterial embolism. Traditionally, warfarin has been used to treat such cases, although this anticoagulant has no inhibitory effects on platelets. The study aim was to determine if antiplatelet agents could prevent thromboembolic events in patients with a MAP.. Since 2001, a total of 265 patients (average age 64.5 ± 12.0 years), each of whom received a MAP with or without additional aortic surgery, was followed at the authors' institution. Patients received a loading dose of clopidogrel or prasugrel + asprin 325 mg and tested for platelet inhibition. The maintenance dose was 75 mg clopidogrel or 10 mg prasugrel + 81 mg aspirin. Platelet reactivity was tested, using two different methods, after one month and at six-month intervals thereafter.. The average follow up was 47.3 ± 44.3 months; total follow up was 11,688.8 months [974 patient-years (pt-yr)]. Over a 16-year period 51 patients died, primarily from myocardial infarction. Twelve patients had strokes (1.2%/pt-yr); of these patients, 10 had discontinued the antiplatelet medication (and were receiving warfarin). One patient was nonresponsive to clopidrogel and another (a compliant patient) was never tested. Strokes were not observed in compliant patients who responded to antiplatelet agents. Thirteen patients had gastrointestinal bleeding, four required transfusion, and three died due to cerebral aneurysms.. Platelet-mediated thromboembolism following MAP installation can be treated with antiplatelet agents. The 16-year results of the present study suggested that antiplatelet agents can reduce thromboembolic events in patients with MAP. Strokes can be prevented in patients with MAP if treated with the correct antiplatelet agent, if the patient responds to the agent employed and is strictly compliant.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Valve; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Puerto Rico; Stroke; Young Adult

The role of more intense, sustained platelet inhibition in preventing stroke after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unclear. We observed a signal for reduced stroke risk in the Targeted Platelet Inhibition to Clarify the Optimal Strategy to Medically Manage Acute Coronary Syndromes (TRILOGY ACS) trial after 12 months of treatment with prasugrel versus clopidogrel in medically managed patients with ACS.. We examined 7243 patients with ACS, aged <75 years and without prior stroke, analyzing differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without a stroke event through 30 months with a Cox proportional hazards model. We also assessed the effect of prasugrel versus clopidogrel (plus aspirin) on risk of all stroke events and ischemic stroke over time with an extended Cox proportional hazards model.. Stroke events were infrequent through 30 months (ischemic stroke=62; hemorrhagic stroke=15). Patients with stroke were older, had more comorbidities, and had a higher Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score. There was a trend for a lower unadjusted frequency of all stroke events through 30 months for prasugrel versus clopidogrel: 31 (1.5%) versus 46 (2.2%); P=0.08. There was a significant treatment-by-time interaction for those with ischemic stroke (P=0.03), consistent with the 12-month landmarked Kaplan-Meier log-rank test showing a reduced hazard of ischemic stroke after 12 months with prasugrel (P=0.04). No significant interactions between treatment effect of prasugrel versus clopidogrel and time were observed for all stroke events.. We observed a potential late treatment effect for prasugrel versus clopidogrel for a reduced risk of ischemic stroke in medically managed patients with ACS aged <75 years. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest that longer duration and more potent platelet inhibition with prasugrel may be associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke after 12 months.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00699998.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Brain Ischemia; Clopidogrel; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Risk; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Early stent thrombosis (EST) (≤ 30 days after stent implantation) is a relatively rare but deleterious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Administration of newer P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) combined with aspirin has been shown to reduce the incidence of sub-acute and late stent thrombosis, compared with clopidogrel. We investigated the "real life" incidence of EST in patients from a large acute coronary syndrome (ACS) national registry, where newer P2Y12 inhibitors are widely used. Patients were derived from the ACS Israeli Survey (ACSIS), conducted during 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2013. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30days were defined as all-cause death, recurrent ACS, EST and stroke.Of the 4717 ACS patients who underwent PCI and stenting, 83% received clopidogrel and 17% newer P2Y12 inhibitors. The rate of EST was similar in both groups (1.7% in the newer P2Y12 inhibitor group vs. 1.4% in the clopidogrel-treated patients, p = 0.42). Results were consistent after multivariate analysis (adjusted HR = 1.06 [p = 0.89]). MACE occurred in 6.4% in the newer P2Y12 inhibitor group compared with 9.2% in the clopidogrel group (P<0.01). However, multivariate logistic regression modeling showed that treatment with newer P2Y12 inhibitors was not significantly associated with the secondary endpoint of MACE when compared with clopidogrel therapy [OR = 1.26 95%CI (0.93-1.73), P = 0.136]. The incidence of "real life" EST at 1month is relatively low, and appears to be similar in patients who receive newer P2Y12 inhibitors as well as in those who receive clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Clopidogrel; Early Diagnosis; Female; Humans; Israel; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Registries; Stents; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

Guidelines recommend the use of adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor (ADPri) therapy for 1 year postacute myocardial infarction; yet, early cessation of therapy occurs frequently in clinical practice.. We examined 11 858 acute myocardial infarction patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention discharged alive on ADPri therapy from 233 United States TRANSLATE-ACS study (Treatment With Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events After Acute Coronary Syndrome) participating hospitals to determine the prevalence of early ADPri cessation (within 1 year), patient-reported reasons for cessation, and associated risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year. Overall, 2514 (21.2%) of percutaneous coronary intervention-treated patients stopped ADPri by 1 year postmyocardial infarction; the median time from discharge to cessation was 200.5 days (25th, 75th percentiles: 71, 340). Among those with early ADPri cessation, 53.9% received drug-eluting stents and had a median duration of 301 treatment days (25th, 75th percentiles: 137, 353); 33.3% of drug-eluting stent patients stopped treatment within 6 months compared with 64.2% of bare metal stent patients. Those discharged on prasugrel (versus clopidogrel) had a slightly higher likelihood of early ADPri cessation (23.2% versus 21.0%; P=0.03; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.40). Patient-reported reasons for early ADPri cessation included physician-recommended discontinuation (54%), as well as patient self-discontinuation, because of cost (19%), medication side effects (9%), and procedural interruption (10%). Using a time-dependent covariate model, early cessation of ADPri therapy was associated with increased major adverse cardiovascular event (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.65; P<0.0001).. One in 5 percutaneous coronary intervention-treated myocardial infarction patients stopped ADPri treatment within 1 year. Early cessation was associated with increased major adverse cardiovascular event risk.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01088503.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Costs; Female; Health Expenditures; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduce gastrointestinal bleeding events but may alter clopidogrel metabolism. We sought to understand the comparative effectiveness and safety of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in the context of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use.. Using data on 11 955 acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention at 233 hospitals and enrolled in the TRANSLATE-ACS study, we compared whether discharge PPI use altered the association of 1-year adjusted risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; death, MI, stroke, or unplanned revascularization) and Global Use of Strategies To Open Occluded Arteries (GUSTO) moderate/severe bleeding between prasugrel- and clopidogrel-treated patients. Overall, 17% of prasugrel-treated and 19% of clopidogrel-treated patients received a PPI at hospital discharge. At 1 year, patients discharged on a PPI versus no PPI had higher risks of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-1.58) and GUSTO moderate/severe bleeding (adjusted HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.15-2.09). Risk of MACE was similar between prasugrel and clopidogrel regardless of PPI use (adjusted HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.62-1.26 with PPI, adjusted HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.90-1.28 without PPI, interaction P=0.31). Comparative bleeding risk associated with prasugrel versus clopidogrel use differed based on PPI use but did not reach statistical significance (adjusted HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.36-1.48 with PPI, adjusted HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.79-2.27 without PPI, interaction P=0.17).. PPIs did not significantly affect the MACE and bleeding risk associated with prasugrel use, relative to clopidogrel.. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01088503.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aftercare; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemorrhage; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Proportional Hazards Models; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study was to compare various antiplatelet regimens in patients who experienced increased platelet reactivity on clopidogrel therapy with regards to cardiovascular outcomes, including need for revascularization, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and cardiovascular (CV) death.. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at the Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center and were subsequently prescribed either clopidogrel 75 mg twice daily, prasugrel 10 mg daily, or clopidogrel 75 mg daily with high platelet reactivity between October 1, 2009 and November 30, 2010. Correlations between antiplatelet regimens and prevention of cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events were evaluated. Groups were evaluated statistically as two separate comparisons; the first comparison being clopidogrel twice daily versus prasugrel and the second comparison being clopidogrel twice daily versus clopidogrel daily in those patients with a P2Y12 test result of less than 50%.. A total of 108 patients were included in the study. Eight events occurred in the clopidogrel twice daily group (n = 26), including five revascularizations and three MIs. Seven events occurred in the prasugrel group (n = 64), including two revascularizations, two MIs, two strokes, and one CV death. The difference between these groups was statistically significant (p = 0.031), with patients in the prasugrel group experiencing fewer events. Five events occurred in the clopidogrel daily group (n = 18), including one need for revascularization, two MIs, and two instances of CV death. There were no statistically significant differences in CV events between the clopidogrel twice daily group and clopidogrel daily group (p > 0.999). There were also no statistically significant differences in bleeding incidents for either of the comparisons; p > 0.999 and p = 0.676 respectively for the first and second comparisons.. Patients on prasugrel had fewer cardiovascular events as compared to patients on clopidogrel twice daily with no difference in bleeding events. No difference was seen with regards to cardiovascular or bleeding events when comparing clopidogrel twice daily to clopidogrel daily in patients with increased platelet reactivity. Study results suggest that there is no benefit to dosing clopidogrel twice daily when compared to either prasugrel or once daily clopidogrel dosing.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Ticlopidine; United States; United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Several clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of thienopyridine monotherapy in ischaemic stroke patients. Non-human primate models of ischaemic stroke have been used for various antithrombotic agents; however, to the best of our knowledge, there is no data on the effects of P2Y12 antagonists in models, such as the thrombotic middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) monkey model. Accordingly, it remains unclear what level of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) is required for optimal treatment of ischaemic stroke. In the present study, we investigated the effects of prasugrel, a third-generation thienopyridine antiplatelet drug, on platelet aggregation, thrombus formation and cerebral infarct volume in a non-human primate model. Daily oral administration of prasugrel resulted in significant and stable platelet inhibitory effects on Day 3, with IPA values ranging from 31% to 36% at 0.3mg/kg/day and from 44% to 50% at 1mg/kg/day. These IPA levels encompassed values observed in clinical trials of clopidogrel, and were thus selected for further study. In the thrombotic MCAO model, prasugrel increased MCA patency in a dose-dependent manner and significantly reduced ischaemic infarct volume by approximately 70% at 0.3mg/kg/day and 90% at 1mg/kg/day without increasing haemorrhagic infarction. Prasugrel also significantly reduced neurological deficit scores by 60% at 0.3mg/kg/day and 80% at 1mg/kg/day. In conclusion, prasugrel treatment resulted in effective reduction of ischaemic infarction and an associated improvement in neurological function without increasing haemorrhagic infarction. These data suggest that prasugrel monotherapy would be effective for the prevention of thrombotic stroke.

Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate; Administration, Oral; Animals; Blood Pressure; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Haplorhini; Hemorrhage; Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery; Macaca fascicularis; Male; Myocardial Ischemia; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Stroke; Thrombosis; Time Factors

Topics: Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine

This study sought to evaluate the impact of treatment with prasugrel and high-dose clopidogrel on the basis of platelet function testing in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. The clinical impact of treatment with prasugrel in patients with ACS who have high platelet reactivity (HPR) is unknown.. Patients with ACS who were pre-treated with clopidogrel and undergoing successful PCI were enrolled in a single-center, prospective registry. Platelet function was measured 12 to 36 h after PCI with the Multiplate device (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Patients with HPR (>46 U) were switched to prasugrel or treated with high-dose clopidogrel, and those without HPR continued treatment with 75 mg of clopidogrel.. A total of 741 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study between September 2011 and August 2012, and 219 of these patients (29.5%) had HPR. Although platelet reactivity decreased after treatment adjustments in those with HPR, prasugrel provided significantly more potent platelet inhibition compared with high-dose clopidogrel (p < 0.0001). Compared with patients without HPR, the risk of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke at 1 year was significantly higher in the high-dose clopidogrel group (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45 to 3.55; p < 0.0001), and patients who were switched to prasugrel had similar outcomes (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.81; p = 0.76). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3/5 bleeding was also more frequent in patients treated with high-dose clopidogrel (HR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.05 to 4.17; p = 0.04) than in patients switched to prasugrel (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.11 to 1.91; p = 0.28). In a multivariate model, HPR with high-dose clopidogrel, but not with prasugrel, was an independent predictor of the composite ischemic endpoint (HR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.17 to 3.08; p = 0.01).. Switching patients with ACS who have HPR to treatment with prasugrel reduces thrombotic and bleeding events to a level similar to that of those without HPR; however, there is a higher risk of both thrombotic and bleeding complications with high-dose clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cause of Death; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Confidence Intervals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Predictive Value of Tests; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Registries; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Stents; Stroke; Survival Rate; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

To compare 30 and 90 day real-world acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and bleeding related rehospitalization rates in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; ACS-PCI) treated with clopidogrel or prasugrel.. Using the Premier hospital database, ACS-PCI patients receiving a drug-eluting (DES) or bare-metal (BMS) stent and clopidogrel or prasugrel from July 2009 to June 2011 were analyzed. Patients were included based on the prasugrel US prescribing information (USPI), excluding patients with a history of transient ischemic attack/stroke and patients ≥75 years without diabetes or prior MI. The primary endpoint was 30 day adjusted AMI rehospitalization rate. Secondary endpoints included 90 day AMI and 30 and 90 day bleeding-related rehospitalization rates. Treatment comparisons were adjusted using propensity score stratification.. At the index event, prasugrel patients (N = 9404) differed from clopidogrel patients (N = 74,163) by having a lower risk of comorbid conditions associated with bleeding, being more likely younger and male, having ST-elevation MI and receiving a DES. For clopidogrel and prasugrel, respectively, the observed AMI-related rehospitalization rates were 4.7% and 3.9% at 30 days (p < 0.0001) and 6.3% and 5.1% at 90 days (p < 0.0001). After adjustment, prasugrel was associated with ∼10% lower odds of AMI-related rehospitalization (30 days: OR = 0.892 [95% CI: 0.798, 0.998]; 90 days, OR = 0.901 [95% CI: 0.817, 0.994]). Adjusted bleeding-related rehospitalization rates were similar to each other (OR = 1.035 at 30 days [95% CI: 0.765, 1.399]; OR = 0.922 at 90 days [95% CI: 0.725, 1.172]).. Treatment adherence was not assessed. Bleeding events not resulting in a hospitalization (e.g. office, outpatient, or emergency room visits), deaths outside the hospital, or readmissions to a hospital outside of the Premier alliance were not captured in the database.. The different patient characteristics between prasugrel- and clopidogrel-treated patients suggest physicians are more selective in choosing patients for prasugrel than recommended in the prasugrel USPI. However, after adjustment for these differences, 30 and 90 day AMI rehospitalization rates were lower for prasugrel-treated patients compared to clopidogrel-treated patients, with no difference in adjusted bleeding-related rehospitalization rates.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Clopidogrel; Female; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stents; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; United States

Atrial fibrillation guidelines recommend long-term use of warfarin according to a patient's predicted risk of stroke. After acute myocardial infarction, however, combining warfarin and antiplatelet medications poses challenges.. By using data from more than 69,255 patients with acute myocardial infarction who were enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines at 309 hospitals from July 1, 2008, to September 30, 2009, we describe the characteristics and outcomes of the population with myocardial infarction with atrial fibrillation diagnosed within 2 weeks before index myocardial infarction admission (7.1%, N=4947). Use of discharge antithrombotic therapy is described overall and across levels of predicted stroke and bleeding risks.. Compared with patients without atrial fibrillation, those with atrial fibrillation before their index myocardial infarction were older and had more comorbidities and worse in-hospital outcomes. Only 32.5% of patients with atrial fibrillation were taking warfarin before their myocardial infarction admission. In these patients, use of warfarin at discharge increased with higher Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke [Doubled] (CHADS(2)) risk strata (28.5%, 34.6%, and 43.5% for CHADS(2) scores 0, 1, and ≥2; P<.001) and increased in patients at low, intermediate, and high risk of bleeding (25.4%, 42.3%, and 42.1%; P=.004). Triple therapy at discharge (aspirin plus clopidogrel plus warfarin) was used in a minority of this population (14.6%).. Use of warfarin at discharge in patients with atrial fibrillation is greater among those with higher stroke and bleeding risks, but despite higher-risk profiles, less than half received warfarin at discharge. These findings highlight that clarification is needed to guide choice of antithrombotic therapy for patients with both atrial fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Atrial Fibrillation; Clopidogrel; Comorbidity; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Discharge; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

Central adjudication in randomised controlled outcome-driven trials represents a traditional approach to maintain data integrity by applying uniformed rules for assessment of clinical events. It was the purpose of this investigation to determine the patterns of myocardial infarction (MI) adjudication in the TRITON, RECORD, and PLATO trials. We were matching centrally-adjudicated MI's (CAMI's) from the official trial publication with the site-reported MI (SRMI's) count from the Food and Drug Administration's secondary analyses for the investigational compounds prasugrel (TRITON), rosiglitazone (RECORD), and ticagrelor (PLATO). CAMI numbers showed a remarkable discrepancy to SRMI's by more than a doubling of the difference: from 72 to 145 events in TRITON favoring prasugrel (from a hazard ratio [HR]=0.76, p=0.08; to a HR=0.76, p<0.001), and from 44 to 89 events in favour of ticagrelor in PLATO (from a HR=0.94, p=0.095; to a HR=0.84, p<0.001). In contrast, in the RECORD trial, the CAMI count was less than the SRMI count (from 24 to 8 events, from a HR=1.42, p=0.93; to a HR=1.14, p=0.96), in this case diminishing cardiovascular hazards in favour of rosiglitazone. In conclusion, central adjudication in the TRITON, the RECORD, and the PLATO trial turned out to have a critical impact on study outcomes. Trial publications should in the future include site-reported major efficacy and safety endpoints to preserve data integrity. The regulatory authorities should consider independent audits when there is a major disagreement between centrally adjudicated and site reported events influencing the results of a major clinical trial.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Judgment; Metformin; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Observer Variation; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Process Assessment, Health Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rosiglitazone; Stroke; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

The prevalence of prasugrel contraindications and specific conditions requiring precaution for its use in a real world acute coronary syndrome (ACS) population is not known. We performed a prospective descriptive study in 1016 consecutive moderate to high risk ACS patients. In 646 patients (63.6%) subjected to percutaneous coronary intervention, analysis of absolute contraindications (history of stroke/transient ischemic attack or active bleeding), relative contraindications and specific conditions (age ≥ 75 years and/or weight < 60 kg) for prasugrel theoretical administration was performed. In 242 (37.5%) patients there was at least one absolute or relative contraindication or specific condition requiring attention for its use. Overall, 23.1% of patients in our cohort had a prior stroke/transient ischemic attack and/or specific condition to be considered for prasugrel administration. Specifically, the prevalence of stroke/TIA was 3.6%, the prevalence of patients ≥75 years 20% and the prevalence of patients weighing <60 kg 2.2%. Among patients ≥75 years old, 63 (9.8%) had diabetes mellitus or previous myocardial infarction, consisting a high risk subgroup that might benefit from prasugrel administration. In a real world ACS population a relatively high proportion of patients have a potential contraindication for prasugrel administration or necessitate special attention for its use.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes

In patients with acute coronary syndromes and planned percutaneous coronary intervention, the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38) demonstrated that treatment with prasugrel versus clopidogrel was associated with reduced rates of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke and an increased risk of major bleeding. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of prasugrel versus clopidogrel from the perspective of the US healthcare system by using data from TRITON-TIMI 38.. Detailed resource use data were prospectively collected for all patients recruited from 8 countries (United States, Australia, Canada, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, and France; n=3373 prasugrel, n=3332 clopidogrel). Hospitalization costs were estimated on the basis of diagnosis-related group and in-hospital complications. Cardiovascular medication costs were estimated by using net wholesale prices (clopidogrel=$4.62/d; prasugrel=$5.45/d). Life expectancy was estimated from in-trial cardiovascular and bleeding events with the use of statistical models of long-term survival from a similar population from the Saskatchewan Health Database. Over a median follow-up of 14.7 months, average total costs (including study drug) were $221 per patient lower with prasugrel (95% confidence interval, -759 to 299), largely because of a lower rate of rehospitalization involving percutaneous coronary intervention. Prasugrel was associated with life expectancy gains of 0.102 years (95% confidence interval, 0.030 to 0.180), primarily because of the decreased rate of nonfatal MI. Thus, compared with clopidogrel, prasugrel was an economically dominant treatment strategy. If a hypothetical generic cost for clopidogrel of $1/d is used, the incremental net cost with prasugrel was $996 per patient, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $9727 per life-year gained.. Among acute coronary syndrome patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention, treatment with prasugrel versus clopidogrel for up to 15 months is an economically attractive treatment strategy.. clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00097591.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Combined Modality Therapy; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Databases, Factual; Drug Costs; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Hospitalization; Humans; Life Expectancy; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombolytic Therapy; Ticlopidine; United States

Impaired response to clopidogrel, or "resistance" is a cornerstone concept for justification of more aggressive antiplatelet regimens, and development of new more potent drugs. There are over 1,000 citations (although predominantly reviews, or case reports) in MEDLINE related to clopidogrel "resistance", while about 100 of them attempted to link low response to adverse clinical outcomes. However, most of these studies are woefully small, and not randomised. The TRITON trial assessed head-to-head novel antiplatelet agent prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. This study was the first in a decade to challenge clopidogrel monopoly, and to indirectly test the "resistance" hypothesis. The primary endpoint was the rate of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or stroke, and occurred in 12.1% of patients treated with clopidogrel, and 9.9% of patients randomised to prasugrel, suggesting impressive vascular outcome benefit of prasugrel over clopidogrel. However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) presented more balanced, and realistic outlook on TRITON. While very early periprocedural benefit exists, long-term prasugrel therapy yielded identical to clopidogrel vascular outcomes among 13,608 TRITON patients challenging the postulate that clopidogrel "resistance" phenomenon is clinically relevant. Despite the fact that prasugrel 10 mg/daily cause 2.5 times more potent platelet inhibition than conventional clopidogrel 75 mg/daily, with fewer patients exhibiting broad response variability, and/or antiplatelet "resistance", the vascular benefit beyond acute phase was identical. Keeping in mind growing over time bleeding, cancer, and mortality risks associated with chronic prasugrel use, small observational studies should be judged with skepticism as hypothesis-generating, pending confirmation in randomised trials.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Drug Approval; Drug Resistance; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Animals; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Incidence; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Myocardial Infarction; Neoplasms, Experimental; Piperazines; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Preoperative Care; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thiophenes; United States

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Clopidogrel; Drug-Eluting Stents; Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

Both clopidogrel and prasugrel require biotransformation to active metabolites by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. Among persons treated with clopidogrel, carriers of reduced-function CYP2C19 alleles have significantly lower levels of active metabolite, diminished platelet inhibition, and higher rates of adverse cardiovascular events. The effect of CYP polymorphisms on the clinical outcomes in patients treated with prasugrel remains unknown.. The associations between functional variants in CYP genes, plasma concentrations of active drug metabolite, and platelet inhibition in response to prasugrel were tested in 238 healthy subjects. We then examined the association of these genetic variants with cardiovascular outcomes in a cohort of 1466 patients with acute coronary syndromes allocated to treatment with prasugrel in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38 trial. Among the healthy subjects, no significant attenuation of the pharmacokinetic or the pharmacodynamic response to prasugrel was observed in carriers versus noncarriers of at least 1 reduced-function allele for any of the CYP genes tested (CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2B6, CYP3A5, and CYP1A2). Consistent with these findings, in subjects with acute coronary syndromes treated with prasugrel, no significant associations were found between any of the tested CYP genotypes and risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.. Common functional CYP genetic variants do not affect active drug metabolite levels, inhibition of platelet aggregation, or clinical cardiovascular event rates in persons treated with prasugrel. These pharmacogenetic findings are in contrast to observations with clopidogrel, which may explain, in part, the different pharmacological and clinical responses to the 2 medications.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Biotransformation; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Female; Genotype; Humans; Male; Microsomes, Liver; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prodrugs; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Stroke; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

(1) For patients with acute coronary syndromes who have undergone percutaneous angioplasty and stenting, the best-assessed treatment for preventing relapses is a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel; (2) Prasugrel, an antiplatelet drug belonging the same chemical class as clopidogrel, is authorized in the EU for use in this indication; (3) Clinical evaluation is based on a randomized double-blind trial comparing prasugrel + aspirin versus clopidogrel + aspirin in 13 608 patients with acute coronary syndromes, half of whom were treated for at least 15 months. Prasugrel did not reduce overall mortality (about 3%) or the incidence of non-fatal stroke after 15 months (1% of patients). The only advantage reported with prasugrel was a significant reduction in the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction (7.3% versus 9.5%); (4) In this trial, bleeding events, excluding those related to revascularisation procedures, were more frequent in the prasugrel group than in the clopidogrel group (2.4% versus 1.8%). Haemorrhages associated with revascularisation were also significantly more numerous with prasugrel (11.3% and 3.6%); (5) Subgroup analyses suggest that the risk-benefit balance of prasugrel is unfavourable in patients weighing less than 60 kg, patients over 75 years of age, and patients with a history of transient ischaemic attack or stroke; (6) The trial comparing prasugrel versus clopidogrel, as well as some animal studies, raise the possibility that prasugrel might increase the risk of cancer. In the main trial, prasugrel caused fewer cases of neutropenia than clopidogrel, but more cases of respiratory failure, hypotension and atrial flutter were observed; (7) In practice, for secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with angioplasty and stenting, the risk-benefit balance of prasugrel, used in combination with aspirin, appears to be no better than that of clopidogrel + aspirin.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clopidogrel; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Hemorrhage; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Myocardial Infarction; Neoplasms; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Purinergic P2; Recurrence; Stents; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome

The P2Y12 receptor has proven to be a key target in the prevention of complications associated with atherosclerotic vascular disease especially in the context of acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention in addition to aspirin. Three generations of thienopyridines, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, and prasugrel have proven efficacy in the prevention of ischemic vascular events but with increased bleeding. The concept of individualized tailored therapy has recently emerged with the discovery of the diminished effect of some thienopyridine among carriers of the loss-of-function cytochrome (CYP) P4502C19*2 variant. Non-thienopyridine P2Y12 antagonists have also recently demonstrated that these benefits are not limited to one class of agents or may be generalizable to reversible antagonists of this receptor. Future rational use of these agents will require attention to disease and patient features to strike the optimal balance of benefit to risk.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Aspirin; Atherosclerosis; Coronary Artery Bypass; Hemorrhage; Humans; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Postoperative Complications; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Purinergic P2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stents; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Clopidogrel; Coronary Disease; Forecasting; Hemorrhage; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Stroke; Thiophenes; Thrombolytic Therapy; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine