prasugrel-hydrochloride and Cerebrovascular-Disorders

The efficacy and safety of different antiplatelet regimes for prevention of stroke in patients at high risk were investigated in a systematic review and meta-analysis.. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. Twenty-two studies comprising 173 371 patients were included.. In the overall population, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel in comparison to aspirin monotherapy reduced the relative risk of total stroke by 20% (risk ratio [RR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.88; P<0.0001; I(2)=28%) and of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack by 23% (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.85; P<0.0001; I(2)=18%) without increasing the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. In the secondary prevention cohort, DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel also reduced the relative risk of total stroke by 24% as compared with aspirin alone (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.86; P<0.0001; I(2)=0%). DAPT with prasugrel or ticagrelor and aspirin versus DAPT with clopidogrel and aspirin was not associated with a risk reduction of stroke.. DAPT with clopidogrel and aspirin compared with aspirin effectively reduces the risk of total and ischemic stroke in the overall cohort consisting of patients with cardiovascular disease without increase in intracranial hemorrhage, as well as decreases the risk of a recurrent total stroke in patients with a previous stroke/transient ischemic attack. Our meta-analysis suggests that DAPT including low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) should be further investigated as a strategy to reduce recurrent strokes.. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero. Unique identifier: CRD42011001596.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Clopidogrel; Cohort Studies; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Population; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Purinergic P2; Secondary Prevention; Stroke; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine; Vascular Diseases

To assess safety up to 1 year of follow-up associated with prasugrel and clopidogrel use in a prospective cohort of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).. Between 2009 and 2012, 2286 patients invasively managed for ACS were enrolled in the multicentre Swiss ACS Bleeding Cohort, among whom 2148 patients received either prasugrel or clopidogrel according to current guidelines. Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) preferentially received prasugrel, while those with non-STEMI, a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, age ≥75 years, or weight <60 kg received clopidogrel or reduced dose of prasugrel to comply with the prasugrel label.. After adjustment using propensity scores, the primary end point of clinically relevant bleeding events (defined as the composite of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium, BARC, type 3, 4 or 5 bleeding) at 1 year, occurred at a similar rate in both patient groups (prasugrel/clopidogrel: 3.8%/5.5%). Stratified analyses in subgroups including patients with STEMI yielded a similar safety profile. After adjusting for baseline variables, no relevant differences in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were observed at 1 year (prasugrel/clopidogrel: cardiac death 2.6%/4.2%, myocardial infarction 2.7%/3.8%, revascularisation 5.9%/6.7%, stroke 1.0%/1.6%). Of note, this study was not designed to compare efficacy between prasugrel and clopidogrel.. In this large prospective ACS cohort, patients treated with prasugrel according to current guidelines (ie, in patients without cerebrovascular disease, old age or underweight) had a similar safety profile compared with patients treated with clopidogrel.. SPUM-ACS: NCT01000701; COMFORTABLE AMI: NCT00962416.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Clopidogrel; Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Guideline Adherence; Hemorrhage; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Ticlopidine; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Despite great advances with the introduction of ticagrelor and prasugrel in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), the risk of thrombosis and bleeding remains significant and affects the choice of clinicians in the treatment of the single patient. Large registries are effective tools to explore patterns of drug administration and adherence to guideline recommendations in real-world clinical practice.. START- antiplatelet is a prospective, observational registry carried out by seven Italian cardiology institutions on patients admitted for ACS aimed to document the real world treatment of ACS patients, adding also data on 12-month follow-up. We present data on the first 1050 patients who have completed 1-year follow-up on a total of 1537 patients. Primary end-points were: 1) MACCE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events) including all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, non fatal MI, urgent revascularization, TIA and ischemic stroke; 2) Major and minor bleeding according to TIMI, GUSTO and ISTH classifications.. The dual antiplatelet treatment most prescribed was aspirin plus ticagrelor (47.9%) and aspirin plus clopidogrel (32.1%). At a mean follow-up was 335±131 days, both ticagrelor and prasugrel are associated with a statistically significant reduced total and cardiovascular mortality. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor do not show a significant increased incidence of major and minor bleedings with respect to clopidogrel. Patients with monotherapy had significantly higher incidence of both ischemic stroke and major bleedings.. The analysis of the register has documented that both ticagrelor and prasugrel are associated with a statistically significant reduced total and cardiovascular mortality but both do not show a significant increased incidence of major and minor bleedings with respect to clopidogrel.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Humans; Italy; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Prospective Studies; Registries; Risk; Stroke; Thrombosis; Ticagrelor; Treatment Outcome

Aspirin is the key treatment in the secondary prevention of atherothrombosis. Interindividual variability of response has been linked to a higher risk for ischemic events. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and biologic factors predicting high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HPR) in a high-risk, "real-world" population of vascular patients. All platelet testing performed from 2011 to 2013 in consecutive patients receiving long-term treatment with aspirin for coronary or cerebrovascular disease was retrospectively analyzed. Indications for platelet testing were recurrent ischemic events or high-risk angioplasty. HPR was defined as aggregation intensity≥20% using light-transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid 0.5 mg/ml. Collagen-epinephrine platelet function analysis was also performed (threshold<165 seconds). Cardiovascular risk factors, usual biologic parameters, and antiplatelet treatment were recorded. A total of 1,508 patients were included (mean age 63 years, 71% men, 23% with diabetes). Antiplatelet treatment was aspirin alone in 333 patients and dual-antiplatelet therapy in 1,175 patients. HPR was found in 11.1% of patients. In multivariate analysis, independent predictive factors of HPR on light-transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid were diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39 to 3.16), age (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.47), fibrinogen level (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.42), and von Willebrand factor level (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.09). On light-transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid and collagen-epinephrine platelet function analysis, fibrinogen remained the main factor associated with HPR (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.61). Similar results were found in patients treated with aspirin alone or dual-antiplatelet therapy. A fibrinogen level>4.0 g/L was associated with a 3.9-fold increased risk for HPR in patients aged <75 years. In conclusion, fibrinogen level was the major predictor of HPR on aspirin in this large population of high-risk vascular patients.

Topics: Adenosine; Aged; Aspirin; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinogen; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Platelet Activation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Predictive Value of Tests; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Retrospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; Thiophenes; Ticagrelor; Ticlopidine

The CYP2C19 genotype is a predictor of adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treated with clopidogrel.. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a CYP2C19*2 genotype-guided strategy of antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients undergoing PCI, compared with two 'no testing' strategies (empiric clopidogrel or prasugrel).. We developed a Markov model to compare three strategies. The model captured adverse cardiovascular events and antiplatelet-related complications. Costs were expressed in 2010 US dollars and estimated using diagnosis-related group codes and Medicare reimbursement rates. The net wholesale price for prasugrel was estimated as $5.45 per day. A generic estimate for clopidogrel of $1.00 per day was used and genetic testing was assumed to cost $500.. Base case analyses demonstrated little difference between treatment strategies. The genetic testing-guided strategy yielded the most QALYs and was the least costly. Over 15 months, total costs were $18 lower with a gain of 0.004 QALY in the genotype-guided strategy compared with empiric clopidogrel, and $899 lower with a gain of 0.0005 QALY compared with empiric prasugrel. The strongest predictor of the preferred strategy was the relative risk of thrombotic events in carriers compared with wild-type individuals treated with clopidogrel. Above a 47% increased risk, a genotype-guided strategy was the dominant strategy. Above a clopidogrel cost of $3.96 per day, genetic testing was no longer dominant but remained cost-effective.. Among ACS patients undergoing PCI, a genotype-guided strategy yields similar outcomes to empiric approaches to treatment, but is marginally less costly and more effective.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Clopidogrel; Computer Simulation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Decision Support Techniques; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Costs; Gene Frequency; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genetic Testing; Health Care Costs; Hemorrhage; Humans; Insurance, Health, Reimbursement; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Markov Chains; Medicare; Models, Economic; Myocardial Infarction; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Pharmacogenetics; Phenotype; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Predictive Value of Tests; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

One possible cause of stent thrombosis is an insufficient effect of clopidogrel. In a prospective study, we aimed to optimize the platelet inhibition of clopidogrel low responders (CLR) by multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA)-guided therapy modifications and to evaluate specific major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was measured by MEA in 1,005 consecutive patients after stent implantation and 600 mg clopidogrel loading dose. All patients received at least 100 mg aspirin/day. In 118 patients (11.7%), ADP values remained in the reference range generated in 150 controls and were defined as CLR. Significant independent predictors of CLR were acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (OR = 6.54), diabetes (OR = 2.07), use of diuretics (OR = 1.93) or proton pump inhibitors (OR = 1.64) and male gender (OR = 1.83). Ninety-nine CLR were switched to clopidogrel 150 mg/day, leading to an adequate response in 54/99. Subsequently, 44 patients were changed to ticlopidine 2 × 250 mg/day, resulting in an inhibition in 24/44. The remaining 20 patients received 2 × 100 mg cilostazol/day in addition to 75 mg clopidogrel/day. After its recent availability, 19/118 primary CLR were treated with 5-10 mg prasugrel/day. One patient was a prasugrel low responder. The total thienopyridine low response-rate was 2% in our population. The specific MACCE rate (death, non-fatal target vessel myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke) of the CLR under optimized treatment (except prasugrel) was 2.0% at 30 days and 3.0% during a mean follow-up of 44 weeks.. Clopidogrel low response is present in 1/10 patients and more frequent in ACS-PCI. MEA-guided optimizing of thienopyridine therapy is feasible and results in a very low specific MACCE rate. Low response to all thienopyridines is rare.

Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate; Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Cilostazol; Clopidogrel; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Drug Substitution; Electrodes; Female; Germany; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Piperazines; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Function Tests; Prasugrel Hydrochloride; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Tetrazoles; Thiophenes; Thrombosis; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome