povidone-iodine has been researched along with Prostatic-Neoplasms* in 4 studies
1 trial(s) available for povidone-iodine and Prostatic-Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Does preoperative topical antimicrobial scrub reduce positive surgical site culture rates in men undergoing artificial urinary sphincter placement?
We determined if the incidence of a perioperative surgical site-positive culture was reduced by a 5-day topical antimicrobial scrub before implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter.. A single surgeon prospective cohort study was conducted of 100 consecutive artificial urinary sphincter implants placed between May 2003 and November 2005. We compared 50 men who performed preoperative topical antimicrobial scrub with 4% chlorhexidine to the abdominal site and perineal site with 50 men who used their normal hygiene (soap and water). All received povidone-iodine skin disinfection before incision, and bacterial cultures of the abdominal and perineal sites were collected immediately after skin disinfection and after artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Baseline comparisons between groups were done with the Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher exact tests. Predictors of positive culture were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis.. The causes of incontinence were radical prostatectomy (90), radiation therapy (8) and transurethral resection of the prostate (2). There were no baseline differences between the groups including age, diabetes or previous urethral surgery. Overall 140 of the 400 cultures were positive with only 37% of the positive cultures (52 of 140) observed with topical antimicrobial scrub. For the perineal site the only factor affecting preoperative culture status was topical antimicrobial scrub (OR 0.23, p = 0.003). A positive postoperative culture was predicted by a positive preoperative perineal (OR 4.61, p = 0.003) and abdominal culture (OR 3.80, p = 0.013).. Preoperative topical antimicrobial scrub resulted in a 4-fold reduction in preoperative perineal colonization rate and overall reduction in positive surgical site cultures. Given the low cost, safety and efficacy, topical antimicrobial scrub should be considered before artificial urinary sphincter placement. Topics: Abdomen; Aged; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Bacteriological Techniques; Chlorhexidine; Cohort Studies; Colony Count, Microbial; Disinfection; Hand Disinfection; Humans; Male; Perineum; Postoperative Complications; Povidone-Iodine; Prospective Studies; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Radiation Injuries; Risk Factors; Skin; Staphylococcus epidermidis; Urethra; Urinary Incontinence; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial | 2007 |
3 other study(ies) available for povidone-iodine and Prostatic-Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Procedural povidone iodine rectal preparation reduces bacteriuria and bacteremia following prostate needle biopsy.
To determine if a povidone iodine rectal preparation (PIRP) reduces rates of bacteriuria and bacteremia following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS PNB).. Men undergoing TRUS PNB were prospectively enrolled in a study comparing the impact of PIRP versus standard of care (two pills of ciprofloxacin 500 mg). Urine, blood, and rectal cultures were obtained 30 minutes post-procedure with colony forming units (CFUs) determined after 48 hours. Patients were called 7 and 30 days post-procedure to evaluate for infections.. A total of 150 men were accrued into this study including 95 receiving PIRP and 55 the standard of care. Two-thirds of patients were undergoing an initial biopsy, 19% used antibiotics within the previous 6 months, and median number of biopsy cores was 14. There were no differences between the two cohorts with respect to baseline or biopsy characteristics. In the PIRP cohort, rectal cultures before and after PIRP administration noted a 97.2% reduction in microorganism colonies (2.4 x 10 5 CFU/mL versus 6.7 x 10³CFU/mL, p < 0.001). Mean urine bacterial counts following TRUS PNB were 1 CFU/mL for PIRP versus 7 CFU/mL for standard cohort (p < 0.001). Mean serum bacterial counts following TRUS PNB were 0 CFU/mL for PIRP versus 3 CFU/mL for standard of care (p = 0.01). One patient in the PIRP cohort (1.1%) developed post-biopsy sepsis while 3 (5.5%) in the standard cohort had an infectious complication (1 UTI, 2 sepsis).. A PIRP regimen reduced bacteruria and bacteremia following TRUS PNB. Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Bacteremia; Bacteriuria; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Povidone-Iodine; Prospective Studies; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Rectum | 2017 |
Povidone Iodine Rectal Preparation at Time of Prostate Needle Biopsy is a Simple and Reproducible Means to Reduce Risk of Procedural Infection.
Single institution and population-based studies highlight that infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS PNB) are increasing. Such infections are largely attributable to quinolone resistant microorganisms which colonize the rectal vault and are translocated into the bloodstream during the biopsy procedure. A povidone iodine rectal preparation (PIRP) at time of biopsy is a simple, reproducible method to reduce rectal microorganism colony counts and therefore resultant infections following TRUS PNB. All patients are administered three days of oral antibiotic therapy prior to biopsy. The PIRP technique involves initially positioning the patient in the standard manner for a TRUS PNB. Following digital rectal examination, 15 ml of a 10% solution of commercially available povidone iodine is mixed with 5 ml of 1% lidocaine jelly to create slurry. A 4 cmx4 cm sterile gauze is soaked in this slurry and then inserted into the rectal vault for 2 min after which it is removed. Thereafter, a disposable cotton gynecologic swab is used to paint both the perianal area and the rectal vault to a distance of 3 cm from the anus. The povidone iodine solution is then allowed to dry for 2-3 min prior to proceeding with standard transrectal ultrasonography and subsequent biopsy. This PIRP technique has been in practice at our institution since March of 2012 with an associated reduction of post-biopsy infections from 4.3% to 0.6% (p=0.02). The principal advantage of this prophylaxis regimen is its simplicity and reproducibility with use of an easily available, inexpensive agent to reduce infections. Furthermore, the technique avoids exposing patients to additional systemic antibiotics with potential further propagation of multi-drug resistant organisms. Usage of PIRP at TRUS PNB, however, is not applicable for patients with iodine or shellfish allergies. Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Bacterial Infections; Biopsy, Needle; Ciprofloxacin; Humans; Male; Povidone-Iodine; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Reproducibility of Results; Sepsis; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Urinary Tract Infections | 2015 |
Effect of intrarectal povidone-iodine in the incidence of infectious complications after transrectal prostatic biopsy.
To assess the incidence of genitourinary infections associated with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-BX) using endorectal povidone-iodine gel as a bactericidal agent.. We prospectively studied a total of 530 patients who were given 30g of 10% povidone-iodine intrarectally before TRUS-BX. Each patient received antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin, starting the previous day (1g/day x 3 days), as well as cleansing enemas.. One patient (0.20%) presented with an E. coli acute bacterial epididymitis after biopsy.. In our study, the intrarectal use of 10% povidone-iodine gel in TRUS-BX is associated with a much lower rate of infectious complications compared to those described in recent literature. Topics: Administration, Rectal; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Bacterial Infections; Biopsy, Needle; Ciprofloxacin; Humans; Incidence; Male; Male Urogenital Diseases; Middle Aged; Povidone-Iodine; Prospective Studies; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Ultrasonography, Interventional | 2012 |