povidone-iodine and Gram-Positive-Bacterial-Infections

povidone-iodine has been researched along with Gram-Positive-Bacterial-Infections* in 12 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for povidone-iodine and Gram-Positive-Bacterial-Infections

ArticleYear
Povidone-iodine in antisepsis--state of the art.
    Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland), 1997, Volume: 195 Suppl 2

    The natural element iodine has been used for more than 150 years to prevent infection and treat wounds. Yet only due to the development of iodophors has it become possible to use this highly efficient microbicide in a wide range of medical applications. The antimicrobial spectrum is universal. Its efficiency against clinically and epidemiologically significant new pathogens, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus sp. has also been validated. No development of resistance has been determined. New data are also available on the excellent local tolerability of Betaisodona (povidone-iodine) preparations. On these grounds, a number of clinical fields exist in prophylaxis and therapy, for either once only or repeated applications: the disinfection of hands and skin, mucosa antisepsis, intra- and postoperative wound treatment, therapy of skin infections, burns and chronic wounds.

    Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Antisepsis; Bacterial Infections; Burns; Chronic Disease; Enterococcus; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Hand; Humans; Intraoperative Care; Iodophors; Methicillin Resistance; Mucous Membrane; Postoperative Care; Povidone-Iodine; Skin; Skin Diseases, Infectious; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Wound Infection

1997

Trials

2 trial(s) available for povidone-iodine and Gram-Positive-Bacterial-Infections

ArticleYear
Effects of preoperative skin preparation on postoperative wound infection rates: a prospective study of 3 skin preparation protocols.
    Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2009, Volume: 30, Issue:10

    To compare the effects of different skin preparation solutions on surgical-site infection rates.. Three skin preparations were compared by means of a sequential implementation design. Each agent was adopted as the preferred modality for a 6-month period for all general surgery cases. Period 1 used a povidone-iodine scrub-paint combination (Betadine) with an isopropyl alcohol application between these steps, period 2 used 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol (ChloraPrep), and period 3 used iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol (DuraPrep). Surgical-site infections were tracked for 30 days as part of ongoing data collection for the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project initiative. The primary outcome was the overall rate of surgical-site infection by 6-month period performed in an intent-to-treat manner.. Single large academic medical center.. All adult general surgery patients.. The study comprised 3,209 operations. The lowest infection rate was seen in period 3, with iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol as the preferred preparation method (3.9%, compared with 6.4% for period 1 and 7.1% for period 2; P = .002). In subgroup analysis, no difference in outcomes was seen between patients prepared with povidone-iodine scrub-paint and those prepared with iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol, but patients in both these groups had significantly lower surgical-site infection rates, compared with rates for patients prepared with 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol (4.8% vs 8.2%; P = .001).. Skin preparation solution is an important factor in the prevention of surgical-site infections. Iodophor-based compounds may be superior to chlorhexidine for this purpose in general surgery patients.

    Topics: 2-Propanol; Adult; Aged; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Chlorhexidine; Female; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Iodine; Male; Middle Aged; Povidone-Iodine; Preoperative Care; Skin; Skin Care; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Surgical Wound Infection; Treatment Outcome

2009
Bacterial contamination in the anterior chamber after povidone-iodine application and the effect of the lens implantation device.
    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2006, Volume: 32, Issue:10

    To assess the incidence of anterior chamber bacterial contamination during cataract surgery, and compare results of injector implantation and forceps implantation of foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs).. Department of Ophthalmology and Institute of Medical Microbiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.. This prospective randomized controlled clinical study comprised 97 eyes of 96 patients. Antibiotic eyedrops were not used; however, povidone-iodine 10% solution was used to prepare the eyebrow and eyelids and povidone-iodine 5% to disinfect the ocular surface. A Steri-Drape (3M) was used to surround the eye. Aqueous fluid samples were aspirated from the anterior chamber at the beginning and the end of surgery. The samples were cultured for 14 days under aerobic and anaerobic conditions simultaneously. Cataract surgery was performed using a sutureless, superotemporal, clear corneal phacoemulsification technique. The IOL was implanted with an injector (n = 47) or a forceps (n = 50), with the instrument randomly selected. The frequency of positive bacterial cultures with each implantation method was compared using the Fisher exact test.. Bacteria were found in the conjunctival samples in 21 eyes (21.65%) before povidone-iodine application and in 4 eyes (4.12%) after disinfection. The anterior chamber sample before surgery was culture positive for Staphylococcus epidermidis in 2 eyes and for Micrococcus luteus in 1 eye. After surgery, the culture was positive for S epidermidis in 1 eye (2.15%) in the injector group and 1 eye (2.00%) in the forceps group (P = .74). Neither sample came from an eye that had a positive culture preoperatively. There were no intraoperative complications.. In uneventful clear corneal phacoemulsification, meticulous technique can prevent antibiotic use during surgery. No difference in anterior chamber bacterial contamination was found between IOL implantation using an injector or a forceps.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anterior Chamber; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Conjunctiva; Eye Infections, Bacterial; Female; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Intraoperative Complications; Lens Implantation, Intraocular; Male; Micrococcus luteus; Middle Aged; Phacoemulsification; Povidone-Iodine; Prospective Studies; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus epidermidis

2006

Other Studies

9 other study(ies) available for povidone-iodine and Gram-Positive-Bacterial-Infections

ArticleYear
The effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics and betadine skin preparation on cranial cutaneous Cutibacterium acnes - A prospective study.
    Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2022, Volume: 100

    Cutibacterium acnes, formerly known as Propionibacterium acnes, is increasingly recognized as a cause of surgical site infection and implant failure despite the use of prophylactic antibiotics and antiseptic surgical preparations. The aim of this study was to investigate whether C. acnes persists in the dermal layer of the skin after standard perioperative antibiotics and skin prepping with alcoholic betadine solution in consecutive patients undergoing a craniotomy.. A single centre prospective observational study was performed at Flinders Medical Centre. Adult patients undergoing a cranial neurosurgical intervention between October 2019 to March 2021 were eligible for inclusion. After administration of standard preoperative antibiotics (Cefazolin), three swabs were taken for each patient: one before prepping the skin with alcoholic betadine, one after prepping the skin and a dermal swab once the skin was incised.. 73 patients were included. Cutibacterium acnes cultures were positive in 61 patients of the "pre-prep" group (83.6%), 12 (16.4%) in the "post-prep" group, and 53 (72.6%) were from dermal swabs There was a significant reduction of positive cultures of the skin after surgical preparation was applied (p < 0.00001). There was a non-significant reduction of positive cultures in the dermal swabs after skin preparation (p = 0.068) CONCLUSIONS: Cutibacterium acnes persists within the dermis of the scalp despite standard prophylactic measures using alcoholic betadine solution and cefazolin.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefazolin; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Propionibacterium acnes; Prospective Studies; Shoulder Joint; Skin

2022
Intravitreal injection of povidone-iodine for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis in rabbit eyes.
    Experimental eye research, 2021, Volume: 208

    The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intravitreal povidone-iodine (PI) in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE) endophthalmitis. Fifty New Zealand white rabbits were divided into 5 groups (n = 10 in each group). After the induction of endophthalmitis using VRE (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≥ 40 μg/mL) in the right eye, Group A, B, C, and D received intravitreal injections of 0.1% PI, 0.3% PI, 0.05% vancomycin, and 0.5% vancomycin, respectively. Eyes in Group E were used as controls. Fundus photography, vitreous culture, electroretinography (ERG), and histologic examinations of the retina were conducted on day 14. A marked improvement in endophthalmitis was observed in Group A, B, C and D, compared to Group E. Fundus photographs showed mild vitreous opacities in Group A and B, and moderate vitreous opacity in Group C. All eyes in Group D had a clear vitreous. In vitreous culture, bacterial growth was found in 6 eyes (100, 200, 200, 400, 500, and 500 colony-forming units) in Group C, but not in Groups A, B, or D. ERG and histological examination also indicated intraocular damage in Group C. Our results show that intravitreal injection of PI, even at low concentrations, was effective for treatment of VRE endophthalmitis, although some vitreous opacity remained. Intravitreal vancomycin injection was also useful to treat resistant strains, if used at a higher concentration within the safety threshold.

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Colony Count, Microbial; Disease Models, Animal; Electroretinography; Endophthalmitis; Enterococcus faecalis; Eye Infections, Bacterial; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Intravitreal Injections; Povidone-Iodine; Rabbits; Retina; Vancomycin Resistance; Vitreous Body

2021
Skin preparation for prevention of peripheral blood culture contamination in children.
    Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society, 2019, Volume: 61, Issue:7

    In Japan, blood cultures for children are performed by pediatric residents, and povidone-iodine (PI) is the recommended solution for skin preparation. Given that PI needs to be applied for 1.5-2 min before venipuncture, skin preparation may be suboptimal if this is not followed. In this study, we investigated the blood culture contamination rate after skin preparation with only 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) or IPA plus PI.. We performed a retrospective study of patients aged ≤6 years who provided blood cultures in the emergency department or pediatric ward. Patients with indwelling central venous catheter were excluded. We evaluated the impact of changing the method of skin preparation, comparing the traditional method using IPA plus PI between 2008 and 2010 (IPA + PI group) with the simplified method using only IPA between 2015 and 2017 (IPA group).. A total of 5,365 blood culture samples were eligible for this study. Of these, 171 (3.2%) had an organism identified in blood culture. Of the blood culture-positive samples, 68 (1.3%) were true positive and 103 (1.9%) were contaminated. Thirty-eight (1.6%) of 2,407 cultures in the IPA group were contaminated, whereas 65 (2.2%) of 2,958 cultures in the IPA + PI group were contaminated (OR, 0.72; 95%CI: 0.48-1.07; P = 0.1). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus grew significantly less in the IPA group (1.7% vs 1.0%, P = 0.02).. A single application of 70% IPA may be the optimal skin preparation method for obtaining peripheral blood cultures from children in Japan.

    Topics: 2-Propanol; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Antisepsis; Bacteremia; Blood Culture; Child; Child, Preschool; Cross-Sectional Studies; False Positive Reactions; Female; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Phlebotomy; Povidone-Iodine; Retrospective Studies; Specimen Handling

2019
Microbiota evaluation of patients with a Boston type I keratoprosthesis treated with topical 0.5% moxifloxacin and 5% povidone-iodine.
    Cornea, 2013, Volume: 32, Issue:4

    To evaluate the efficacy of a prophylactic regimen of daily topical 0.5% moxifloxacin and 5% povidone-iodine (PI) in patients with Boston type I keratoprosthesis (KPro) and to assess the applicability of a novel molecular diagnostic technique to analyze the ocular surface microbiota in these patients.. Ten patients had their inferior conjunctival fornix sampled for standard culture methods before the addition of topical 5% PI to the prophylactic regimen and were considered the control group (group 1). The inferior conjunctival fornix and the KPro-donor cornea interface of 10 patients treated with the mentioned prophylactic regimen were sampled and analyzed by standard culture methods and using a polymerase chain reaction/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry assay (group 2).. Samples from the inferior conjunctival fornix were positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus in 3 patients and for Aerobasidium pullulans in 1 patient in group 1. The inferior conjunctival fornix and the KPro-donor cornea interface scrapings were positive for coagulase-negative staphylococcus in 2 patients and 1 patient, respectively, in group 2. No bacteria and fungi growth were detected in any patient from group 2 with the molecular diagnostic approach. None of the patients with culture-positive results developed keratitis or endophthalmitis during the study.. Topical 0.5% moxifloxacin associated with topical 5% PI is an effective prophylactic regimen in patients with Boston type I KPro. The molecular diagnostic approach using serial polymerase chain reaction and mass spectrometry was comparable with standard microbiologic techniques as a surveillance tool in these patients.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Corneal Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endophthalmitis; Eye Infections, Bacterial; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Male; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques; Moxifloxacin; Povidone-Iodine; Prospective Studies; Prostheses and Implants; Quinolines; Staphylococcus aureus

2013
Perioperative, postoperative, and prophylactic use of antibiotics in alloplastic total temporomandibular joint replacement surgery: a survey and preliminary guidelines.
    Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2011, Volume: 69, Issue:8

    In 2009, the American Academy Of Orthopedic Surgeons recommended lifelong prophylaxis after orthopedic total joint replacement (TJR) before these patients undergo dental, aerodigestive, genitourinary (GU), and gastrointestinal (GI) procedures. Because oral and maxillofacial surgeons worldwide are implanting alloplastic total temporomandibular joint replacements (TMJ TJRs), it appeared reasonable to survey these surgeons to obtain data that might shed some light, not only on this issue, but also to obtain some data to begin to develop preliminary guidelines for the peri- and postoperative use of antibiotics for TMJ TJR using these results and the orthopedic data.. A total of 35 surgeons worldwide, members of either the TMJ Concepts or Biomet Microfixation online networks were e-mailed a standard questionnaire surveying their perioperative, postoperative, and prophylactic use of antibiotics for their TMJ TJR cases.. Of the 35 surgeons, 26 (74.2%) from 8 different countries responded. A total of 2,476 cases (3,368 joints) were retrospectively surveyed. Of the responding surgeons, 96.2% used, in order of frequency, cefazolin, clindamycin, cephalosporin, or penicillin-based antibiotics in the perioperative period and continued their use for a mean of 7 days (range 5 to 14) postoperatively. Also, 46.2% soaked the TJR components either in the perioperative antibiotic or in vancomycin, poviodine, gentamycin, or peroxide before implantation. In addition, 61.5% irrigated the wounds after device implantation with bacitracin, vancomycin, poviodine, peroxide, or the perioperative antibiotic. These surgeons reported that 51 joints (1.51%) had become infected within a mean of 6 months (range 2 weeks to 12 years) postoperatively. A total of 32 devices (0.95%) required removal and/or replacement. In cases in which the organisms were isolated, the organisms commonly associated with biofilm infection of TJR devices, Staphylococcus aureus, S epidermidis, Peptostreptococcus, and Pseudamonas aeruginosa, were cultured. In only 1 joint (0.003%) was there a suggestion of an association with an invasive dental/aerodigestive, GU/GI procedure. Regarding prophylaxis after TMJ TJRs and before dental/aerodigestive, GU, or GI procedures, 53.8% of the respondents reported that they provided prophylaxis. Of these, 1 recommended doing this for 6 months and 4 for 2 years, such as has been the American Dental Association/American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons recommendation since 2003; and 9 reported they believe these TMJ TJR patients should have lifetime antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental/aerodigestive, GU, or GI procedures.. The evidence provided from the present small study survey and a review of the orthopedic data could provide the opportunity to develop guidelines for the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative antibiotic management for TMJ TJRs and spur additional research into this important area of patient management.

    Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Arthroplasty, Replacement; Bacitracin; Biofilms; Cefazolin; Cephalosporins; Clindamycin; Device Removal; Disinfection; Gentamicins; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Penicillins; Peptostreptococcus; Peroxides; Povidone-Iodine; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Dentists'; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Retrospective Studies; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus epidermidis; Surgical Wound Infection; Temporomandibular Joint; Therapeutic Irrigation; Vancomycin

2011
[Investigation of the efficacy of some disinfectants against nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. isolates].
    Mikrobiyoloji bulteni, 2011, Volume: 45, Issue:3

    Nosocomial infections which exhibit an increasing trend worldwide, are important contributors to morbidity and mortality. Most bacteria that cause nosocomial infections can retain their viability even after exposure to disinfectants in routine practice. This study was conducted to determine the susceptibilities of nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. isolates to various disinfectants. A total of 30 S.aureus [16 were methicillin-resistant (MRSA), 14 were methicillin-susceptible (MSSA)] and 21 Enterococcus spp. (13 E.faecalis, 7 E.faecium, 1 non-typable Enterococcus spp.) strains isolated from clinical samples of hospitalized patients as nosocomial infection agents in the Central Microbiology Laboratory of Ibn-i Sina Hospital, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, were included in the study. Glutaraldehyde (2% wt/vol), chlorhexidine gluconate (4% wt/vol), 2-propanol (70% vol/vol), povidone iodine (7.5% wt/vol), povidone iodine (10% wt/vol) and hydrogen peroxide (3% wt/vol) susceptibilities of the isolates were investigated by quantitative suspension test at contact times of 3, 5, and 10 minutes. All of the isolates were found susceptible to glutaraldehyde (2%), chlorhexidine gluconate (4%), povidone iodine (7.5%), povidone iodine (10%) and 2-propanol (70%) at all tested contact times. However, 12 S.aureus (5 MSSA, 7 MRSA) and 3 enterococci (2 E.faecium, 1 E.faecalis) isolates were found susceptible to hydrogen peroxide (3%) at 3 minutes contact time; 11 S.aureus (4 MSSA, 7 MRSA) and 7 E.faecalis isolates were found susceptible at 5 minutes contact time, and 6 S.aureus (4 MSSA, 2 MRSA) and 3 enterococci (1 E.faecium, 2 E.faecalis) isolates were found susceptible at 10 minutes contact time. One MSSA and 8 enterococci (4 E.faecium, 3 E.faecalis, 1 Enterococcus spp.) isolates were found resistant to hydrogen peroxide (3%) at 10 minutes contact time. In conclusion, glutaraldehyde (2%), chlorhexidine gluconate (4%), povidone iodine (7.5%), povidone iodine (10%) and 2-propanol (70%) can be safely used against S.aureus and Enterococcus spp. owing to their high effectiveness, however, hydrogen peroxide (3%) should not be preferred against those strains due to the presence of resistant isolates, in Ankara University Ibn-i Sina Hospital.

    Topics: 2-Propanol; Chlorhexidine; Cross Infection; Disinfectants; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Enterococcus; Glutaral; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Hydrogen Peroxide; Povidone-Iodine; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Time Factors; Turkey

2011
An in vitro analysis of microbial transmission during EUS-guided FNA and the utility of sterilization agents.
    Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2006, Volume: 64, Issue:5

    The risk of infection and potential microbial transmission with EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) of cystic lesions remains unknown.. We developed an in vitro model to study the incidence of transmucosal microbial transmission during EUS-FNA of cystic lesions and to evaluate the in vitro efficacy of bacteriocidal agent washings of mucosa before FNA under experimental conditions.. Conical tubes, 15 mL, filled with aerobic blood culture bottle media were prepared. Then sterile sections of bovine tripe were fastened over the top of the conical tubes in a sterile fashion (conical tube-tripe unit). FNA was performed with 22-gauge FNA needles. A series of 6 experiments were performed. Ten conical tube-tripe units underwent FNA once through the tripe into the blood culture media to ensure sterility. The surface of 10 conical tube-tripe units were inoculated with 50 microL of a 1.5 x 10(8) 1:1 mixture of Escherichia coli (E coli) and Enterococcus sp, and FNA was performed one time into the blood culture media to ensure contamination (controls). The surface of 40 conical tube-tripe units were inoculated with 50 microL of a 1.5 x 10(8) 1:1 mixture of E coli and Enterococcus sp Each of 4 sets of 10 conical tube-tripe units underwent experimental scenarios that consisted of washings with either 1 mL of 0.5% povidone iodine, chlorhexidine, absolute ethanol, or sterile water. FNA was performed once through the tripe into the blood culture media after washing the surface of the tripe. After each conical tube-tripe unit underwent FNA one time, 1 mL blood culture media was obtained and mixed on pour plate agar media and was incubated along with the conical tubes. Microbial evaluation of the conical tubes that contained the blood culture media and pour plates was performed after 48 hours of incubation.. Gastroenterology and Microbiology Departments of Scott White Memorial Hospital and Clinic in Temple, Texas.. EUS-FNA of cystic lesions.. Microbial contamination during EUS-FNA of an in vitro cystic environment.. A control without E coli and Enterococcus sp was with 0% contamination. A control group with E coli and Enterococcus sp was with 100% contamination; sterile water washings, 100% contamination (P = 1.00); iodine washings, 20% contamination (P < .001); chlorhexidine washings, 80% contamination (P = .47); and absolute ethanol washings, 90% contamination (P = 1.00). Results were compared with our control group by statistical tests of proportions by using the Fisher exact test.. EUS-FNA of sterile cystic lesions resulted in transmucosal microbial contamination. However, our model demonstrated that iodine sterilization of a contaminated mucosal surface produced a very highly statistically significant (P < .001) reduction in the transmission of infectious agents into a sterile environment. This in vitro model could translate into clinical practice by providing evidence that microbial transmission by FNA occurred. The utility of povidone iodine washings could alter procedure methods and patient care.

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Biopsy, Fine-Needle; Cattle; Cysts; Drug Contamination; Endosonography; Enterococcus; Equipment Contamination; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Gastric Mucosa; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Pancreatic Cyst; Povidone-Iodine; Sterilization

2006
Evaluation of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis using a surface test.
    The Journal of hospital infection, 2000, Volume: 46, Issue:2

    Most published studies of the activity of biocides against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have been based on suspension tests. This study was undertaken to provide information on the effect of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine on bacteria dried on to surfaces, a situation in which biocide activity is known to be reduced. The inactivation of MRSA (10 strains), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, 10 strains), VRE (nine strains) and vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus faecalis (VSE, 10 strains) by 0.5% aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate or 10% povidone iodine was evaluated by applying the European surface test method. Povidone iodine was equally active against resistant and sensitive strains of both species with microbicidal effects (ME), i.e. the log(10)concentration of micro-organisms compared with controls treated with distilled water, after 1.5 min of 3.14 and 3.49 for VRE and VSE respectively, and 3.47 and 3.78 for MRSA and MSSA. Chlorhexidine was equally active against VRE and VSE (ME 3.37 vs. 3. 56 after 7 min, respectively), but was significantly less active against MRSA as opposed to MSSA (ME 3.07 vs. 3.83 after 10 min, P= 0. 017).

    Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Chlorhexidine; Cross Infection; Disinfectants; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Enterococcus faecalis; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Infection Control; Israel; Methicillin Resistance; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Povidone-Iodine; Serotyping; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Time Factors; Vancomycin Resistance

2000
Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection by meatal disinfection.
    Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland), 1997, Volume: 195 Suppl 2

    The incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs) becomes higher with prolongation of the indwelling period of a catheter. As to the entry of bacteria, ascending UTIs have now attracted attention. In the present study. the metal area was examined bacteriologically and the possibility to use antiseptics for blocking the route of developing infections was investigated. The subjects included 72 patients with an indwelling, urethral catheter inserted post-operatively. These patients were divided into three groups treated with once or twice daily application of povidone-iodine or once daily application of povidone-iodine cream. In these groups, the relation between changes in isolation of bacteria from the meatal area and the incidence of UTI was evaluated. It was found that reduction in bacterial count by antisepsis is effective to prevent ascending UTIs. Moreover, once daily application of povidone-iodine was proven to be effective in male patients. The effective antisepsis in females was twice daily application of povidone-iodine.

    Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Antisepsis; Bacteria; Bacteriuria; Burkholderia; Catheters, Indwelling; Chemoprevention; Colony Count, Microbial; Enterobacteriaceae; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Enterococcus; Female; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Incidence; Iodophors; Male; Postoperative Care; Povidone-Iodine; Sex Factors; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus; Urethra; Urinary Catheterization; Urinary Tract Infections

1997