povidone-iodine and Endometritis

Precesarean vaginal antisepsis can benefit pregnant women with ruptured membranes. However, in the general population, recent trials have shown mixed results in reducing postoperative infections. This study aimed to systematically review clinical trials and summarize the most suitable vaginal preparations for cesarean delivery in preventing postoperative infection.. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SinoMed databases, and the ClinicalTrials.gov clinical trials registry for randomized controlled trials and conference presentations (past 20 years, 2003-2022). Reference lists of previous meta-analyses were searched manually. In addition, we conducted subgroup analysis on the basis of whether the studies were conducted in developed or developing countries, whether the membranes were ruptured, and whether patients were in labor.. We included randomized controlled trials comparing vaginal preparation methods for the prevention of postcesarean infection with each other or with negative controls.. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence. The effectiveness of prevention strategies was assessed by frequentist-based network meta-analysis models. The outcomes were endometritis, postoperative fever, and wound infection.. A total of 23 trials including 10,026 cesarean delivery patients were included in this study. Vaginal preparation methods included 19 iodine-based disinfectants (1%, 5%, and 10% povidone-iodine; 0.4% and 0.5% iodophor) and 4 guanidine-based disinfectants (0.05% and 0.20% chlorhexidine acetate; 1% and 4% chlorhexidine gluconate). Overall, vaginal preparation significantly reduced the risks of endometritis (3.4% vs 8.1%; risk ratio, 0.41 [0.32-0.52]), postoperative fever (7.1% vs 11.4%; risk ratio, 0.58 [0.45-0.74]), and wound infection (4.1% vs 5.4%; risk ratio, 0.73 [0.59-0.90]). With regard to disinfectant type, iodine-based disinfectants (risk ratio, 0.45 [0.35-0.57]) and guanidine-based disinfectants (risk ratio, 0.22 [0.12-0.40]) significantly reduced the risk of endometritis, and iodine-based disinfectants reduced the risk of postoperative fever (risk ratio, 0.58 [0.44-0.77]) and wound infection (risk ratio, 0.75 [0.60-0.94]). With regard to disinfectant concentration, 1% povidone-iodine was most likely to simultaneously reduce the risks of endometritis, postoperative fever, and wound infection.. Preoperative vaginal preparation can significantly reduce the risk of postcesarean infectious diseases (endometritis, postoperative fever, and wound infection); 1% povidone-iodine has particularly outstanding effects.

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Communicable Diseases; Disinfectants; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Iodine; Network Meta-Analysis; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Surgical Wound Infection

We aimed to investigate the effect of various vaginal wash solutions on reducing risks of post-cesarean endometritis, wound infections, fever, and hospital stay duration.. Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized clinical trials that compared different vaginal wash solutions to each other or to "no vaginal cleaning"; without restriction on the age of parturients or site where trials were conducted. We analyzed this frequentist network meta-analysis using the netmeta package in R software version 4.1.2; synthesized data as mean difference or risk ratio with their 95% confidence intervals.. Our network meta-analysis included 29 RCTs with a total sample size of 9311 women undergoing CS. Regarding post-cesarean endometritis, we found that povidone-iodine had the highest significant risk reduction compared to "no vaginal cleaning" (RR = 0.08, 95% CI [0.01, 0.69]). While regarding post-cesarean reduction of wound infection, fever, and hospital stay duration, we found that chlorhexidine 4% (RR = 0.17, 95% CI [0.05, 0.65]), saline 0.9% (RR = 0.12, 95% CI [0.03; 0.48]), and saline 0.9% (MD = -1.29, 95% CI [-2.18; -0.39]), respectively, had the highest significant risk reduction compared to "no vaginal cleaning.". Vaginal wash solutions were associated with a significant reduction of post-cesarean endometritis, wound infection, fever, and hospital stay duration. Since povidone-iodine had the highest significant reduction of post-cesarean endometritis, we recommend setting povidone-iodine as the standard practice as pre cesarean vaginal wash solution; consistent practice guidelines of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS).

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Endometritis; Female; Fever; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Postoperative Complications; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Surgical Wound Infection

Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by obstetricians. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery can have a tremendous impact on the postpartum woman's return to normal function and her ability to care for her baby. Despite the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, postoperative infectious morbidity still complicates cesarean deliveries. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2010 and subsequently updated in 2012, twice in 2014, in 2017 and 2018.. To determine if cleansing the vagina with an antiseptic solution before a cesarean delivery decreases the risk of maternal infectious morbidities, including endometritis and wound complications. We also assessed the side effects of vaginal cleansing solutions to determine adverse events associated with the intervention.. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (7 July 2019), and reference lists of retrieved studies.. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs assessing the impact of vaginal cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery with any type of antiseptic solution versus a placebo solution/standard of care on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. Cluster-RCTs were eligible for inclusion, but we did not identify any. We excluded trials that utilized vaginal preparation during labor or that did not use antibiotic surgical prophylaxis. We also excluded any trials using a cross-over design. We included trials published in abstract form only if sufficient information was present in the abstract on methods and outcomes to analyze.. At least three of the review authors independently assessed eligibility of the studies. Two review authors were assigned to extract study characteristics, quality assessments, and data from eligible studies.. We included 21 trials, reporting results for 7038 women evaluating the effects of vaginal cleansing (17 using povidone-iodine, 3 chlorhexidine, 1 benzalkonium chloride) on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. Trials used vaginal preparations administered by sponge sticks, douches, or soaked gauze wipes. The control groups were typically no vaginal preparation (17 trials) or the use of a saline vaginal preparation (4 trials). One trial did not report on any outcomes of interest. Trials were performed in 10 different countries (Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, Thailand, Turkey, USA, Egypt, UK, Kenya and India). The overall risk of bias was low for areas of attrition, reporting, and other bias. About half of the trials had low risk of selection bias, with most of the remainder rated as unclear. Due to lack of blinding, we rated performance bias as high risk in nearly one-third of the trials, low risk in one-third, and unclear in one-third. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution immediately before cesarean delivery probably reduces the incidence of post-cesarean endometritis from 7.1% in control groups to 3.1% in vaginal cleansing groups (average risk ratio (aRR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 0.58; 20 trials, 6918 women; moderate-certainty evidence). This reduction in endometritis was seen for both iodine-based solutions and chlorhexidine-based solutions. Risks of postoperative fever and postoperative wound infection are also probably reduced by vaginal antiseptic preparation (fever: aRR 0.64, 0.50 to 0.82; 16 trials, 6163 women; and wound infection: RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.77; 18 trials, 6385 women; both moderate-certainty evidence). Two trials found that there may be a lower risk of a composite outcome of wound complication or endometritis in women receiving preoperative vaginal preparation (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.82; 2 trials, 499 women; low-certainty evidence). No adverse effects were reported with either the povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine vaginal cleansing. Subgroup analysis suggested a greater effect with vaginal preparations for those women in labour versus those not in labour for four out of five outcomes examined (post-cesarean endometritis; postoperative fever; postoperative wound infection; composite wound complication or endometritis). This apparent difference needs to be investigated further in future trials. We did not observe any subgroup differences between women with ruptured membranes and women with intact membranes.. Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine solution compared to saline or not cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery probably reduces the risk of post-cesarean endometritis, postoperative fever, and postoperative wound infection. Subgroup analysis found that these benefits were typically present whether iodine-based or chlorhexidine-based solutions were used and when women were in labor before the cesarean. The suggested benefit in women in labor needs further investigation in future trials. There was moderate-certainty evidence using GRADE for all reported outcomes, with downgrading decisions based on limitations in study design or imprecision. As a simple intervention, providers may consider implementing preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine before performing cesarean deliveries. Future research on this intervention being incorporated into bundles of care plans for women receiving cesarean delivery will be needed.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Benzalkonium Compounds; Cesarean Section; Chlorhexidine; Disinfection; Endometritis; Female; Fever; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surgical Wound Infection

The risk of maternal mortality and morbidity is higher after caesarean section than for vaginal birth. With increasing rates of caesarean section, it is important to minimise risks to the mother as much as possible. This review focused on different skin preparations to prevent infection. This is an update of a review last published in 2018.. To compare the effects of different antiseptic agents, different methods of application, or different forms of antiseptic used for preoperative skin preparation for preventing postcaesarean infection.. For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (9 July 2019), and reference lists of retrieved studies.. Randomised and quasi-randomised trials, evaluating any type of preoperative skin preparation (agents, methods or forms). We included studies presented only as abstracts, if there was enough information to assess risk of bias. Comparisons of interest in this review were between: different antiseptic agents (e.g. alcohol, povidone iodine), different methods of antiseptic application (e.g. scrub, paint, drape), different forms of antiseptic (e.g. powder, liquid), and also between different packages of skin preparation including a mix of agents and methods, such as a plastic incisional drape, which may or may not be impregnated with antiseptic agents. We mainly focused on the comparison between different agents, with and without the use of drapes. Only studies involving the preparation of the incision area were included. This review did not cover studies of preoperative handwashing by the surgical team or preoperative bathing.. Three review authors independently assessed all potential studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias, extracted the data and checked data for accuracy. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.. We included 13 individually-randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with a total of 6938 women who were undergoing caesarean section. Twelve trials (6916 women) contributed data to this review. The trial dates ranged from 1983 to 2016. Six trials were conducted in the USA, and the remainder in India, Egypt, Nigeria, South Africa, France, Denmark, and Indonesia. The included studies were broadly at low risk of bias for most domains, although high risk of detection bias raised some specific concerns in a number of studies. Length of stay was only reported in one comparison. Antiseptic agents Parachlorometaxylenol with iodine versus iodine alone We are uncertain whether parachlorometaxylenol with iodine made any difference to the incidence of surgical site infection (risk ratio (RR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 2.99; 1 trial, 50 women), or endometritis (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.38; 1 trial, 50 women) when compared with iodine alone, because the certainty of the evidence was very low. Adverse events (maternal or neonatal) were not reported. Chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine Moderate-certainty evidence suggested that chlorhexidine gluconate, when compared with povidone iodine, probably slightly reduces the incidence of surgical site infection (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.91; 8 trials, 4323 women). This effect was still present in a sensitivity analysis after removing four trials at high risk of bias for outcome assessment (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.23; 4 trials, 2037 women). Low-certainty evidence indicated that chlorhexidine gluconate, when compared with povidone iodine, may make little or no difference to the incidence of endometritis (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.86; 3 trials, 2484 women). It is uncertain whether chlorhexidine gluconate reduces maternal skin irritation or allergic skin reaction (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.46; 3 trials, 1926 women; very low certainty evidence). One small study (60 women) reported reduced bacterial growth at 18 hours after caesarean section for women who had chlorhexidine gluconate preparation compared with women who had povidone iodine preparation (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.70). Methods Drape versus no drape This comparison investigated the use of drape versus no drape, following preparation of the skin with antiseptics. Low-certainty evidence suggested that using a drape before surgery compared with no drape, may make little or no difference to the incidence of surgical site infection (RR 1.29, 95% confid. Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that preparing the skin with chlorhexidine gluconate before caesarean section is probably slightly more effective at reducing the incidence of surgical site infection in comparison to povidone iodine. For other outcomes examined there was insufficient evidence available from the included RCTs. Most of the evidence in this review was deemed to be very low or low certainty. This means that for most findings, our confidence in any evidence of an intervention effect is limited, and indicates the need for more high-quality research. Therefore, it is not yet clear what sort of skin preparation may be most effective for preventing postcaesarean surgical site infection, or for reducing other undesirable outcomes for mother and baby. Well-designed RCTs, with larger sample sizes are needed. High-priority questions include comparing types of antiseptic (especially iodine versus chlorhexidine), and application methods (scrubbing, swabbing, or draping). We found two studies that are ongoing; we will incorporate the results of these studies in future updates of this review.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Bandages; Cesarean Section; Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Ethanol; Female; Humans; Iodine; Iodophors; Length of Stay; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surgical Drapes; Surgical Wound Infection; Xylenes

Direct comparison metaanalyses have reported benefits with presurgical vaginal preparation before cesarean delivery for the reduction of endometritis. These reports did not perform a multitreatment comparison of the various antiseptic solutions assessed in previous studies.. The purpose of this study was to review the literature systematically and quantitate and summarize indirectly the comparative efficacy of antiseptic formulations and their concentrations that are used for the preparation of the vagina before cesarean delivery in the prevention of endometritis and other infectious complications.. We used MEDLINE, EMBASE (from their inception to November 2018) and Cochrane databases, biographies, and conference proceedings. We used randomized clinical trials of patients who underwent surgical preparation of the vagina with antiseptic formulations before cesarean delivery with the aim of reducing the risk of infectious morbidity. Our systematic review was registered and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Extension for network meta-analysis guidelines. Network meta-analysis was performed with computerized software and used user-written programs to assess consistency, inconsistency, ranking probabilities, and graphing results. Direct and indirect pairwise comparisons of the various formulations and their concentrations were performed with the use of multivariate random-effects models and metaregression. A frequentist inference method was employed for the fitted model to estimate the ranking probabilities. Subgroup analyses for patients in labor, not in labor, and with ruptured membranes were conducted.. For the prevention of endometritis, we identified 23 studies that comprised 7097 women who were allocated to the following treatments: povidone-iodine (1%, 5%, 10%), chlorhexidine (0.2%, 0.4%), metronidazole gel, cetrimide, or normal saline solution/no treatment. Direct and indirect pairwise comparisons indicated that, when compared with saline solution or no treatment, all antiseptic formulations decreased rates of endometritis (5.2% vs 9.1%; odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.65; 22 studies/6994 women). Individually, povidone-iodine (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.64; 16 studies/5968 women), cetrimide (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.90; 1 study/200 women), and metronidazole (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.90; 1 study/224 women) significantly reduced the risk of endometritis. Rankings of vaginal preparations indicated that povidone-iodine 1% had the highest probability (72.7%) of being the most effective treatment for the prevention of endometritis. For the secondary outcomes of postoperative wound infection and fever, a significant reduction was found only with povidone-iodine (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.78; 16 studies/5968 women; and odds ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.83; 12 studies/4667 women). Subgroup analyses also found that povidone-iodine significantly reduced risk of endometritis for women in labor (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.88; 5 studies/1211 women), with ruptured membranes(odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.44; 4 studies/476 women), and undergoing planned cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.57; 8 studies/1825 women).. Among patients who underwent cesarean delivery, presurgical vaginal irrigation with povidone-iodine had the highest probability of reducing the risk of endometritis, postoperative wound infections, and fever.

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Cetrimonium; Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Metronidazole; Network Meta-Analysis; Povidone-Iodine

Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by obstetricians. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery can have a tremendous impact on the postpartum woman's return to normal function and her ability to care for her baby. Despite the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, postoperative infectious morbidity still complicates cesarean deliveries. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2010 and subsequently updated in 2012, and twice in 2014.. To determine if cleansing the vagina with an antiseptic solution before a cesarean delivery decreases the risk of maternal infectious morbidities, including endometritis and wound complications. We also assessed the side effects of vaginal cleansing solutions to determine adverse events associated with the intervention.. We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (10 July 2017), and reference lists of retrieved studies.. We included randomized trials and one quasi-randomized trial assessing the impact of vaginal cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery with any type of antiseptic solution versus a placebo solution/standard of care on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. Cluster-randomized trials were eligible for inclusion but none were identified. We excluded trials that utilized vaginal preparation during labor or that did not use antibiotic surgical prophylaxis. We also excluded any trials using a cross-over design.. At least three of the review authors independently assessed eligibility of the studies. Two review authors were assigned to extract study characteristics, quality assessments, and data from eligible studies.. We included 11 trials reporting results for 3403 women evaluating the effects of vaginal cleansing (eight using povidone-iodine, two chlorhexidine, one benzalkonium chloride) on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. Additionally, some trials used vaginal preparations using sponge sticks, douches, or soaked gauze wipes. The control groups were typically no vaginal preparation (eight trials) or the use of a saline vaginal preparation (three trials). The risk of bias in the studies reduced our confidence in the results for endometritis outcomes.Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution immediately before cesarean delivery probably reduces the incidence of post-cesarean endometritis from 8.7% in control groups to 3.8% in vaginal cleansing groups (average risk ratio (RR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.63, 10 trials, 3283 women, moderate quality of evidence). Subgroup analysis could not rule out larger reductions in endometritis with antiseptics in women who were in labor or in women whose membranes had ruptured when antiseptics were used. Risks of postoperative fever and postoperative wound infection may be slightly lowered by antiseptic preparation, but the confidence intervals around the effects for both outcomes are consistent with a large reduction in risk and no difference between groups (fever: RR 0.87 (0.72 to 1.05; wound infection: RR 0.74 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.11), both moderate-quality evidence). Two trials reported a lower risk of a composite outcome of wound complication or endometritis in women receiving preoperative vaginal preparation (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.82, two trials, 499 women, moderate-quality evidence). No adverse effects were reported with either the povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine vaginal cleansing.. Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine solution compared to saline or not cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery probably reduces the risk of post-cesarean endometritis. Subgroup analysis could not rule out larger reductions in endometritis with antiseptics in women who were in labor or in women whose membranes had ruptured when antiseptics were used.The quality of the evidence using GRADE was moderate for all reported outcomes. We downgraded the outcome of post-cesarean endometritis and composite of wound complications or endometritis for risk of bias and postoperative fever and postoperative wound infections for wide CIs.As a simple, generally inexpensive intervention, providers may consider implementing preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine before performing cesarean deliveries.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Benzalkonium Compounds; Cesarean Section; Chlorhexidine; Disinfection; Endometritis; Female; Fever; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surgical Wound Infection; Vagina

The risk of maternal mortality and morbidity (particularly postoperative infection) is higher for caesarean section (CS) than for vaginal birth. With the increasing rate of CS, it is important to minimise the risks to the mother as much as possible. This review focused on different forms and methods of preoperative skin preparation to prevent infection. This review is an update of a review that was first published in 2012, and updated in 2014.. To compare the effects of different antiseptic agents, different methods of application, or different forms of antiseptic used for preoperative skin preparation for preventing postcaesarean infection.. For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (27 November 2017), and reference lists of retrieved studies.. Randomised and quasi-randomised trials, evaluating any type of preoperative skin preparation agents, forms, and methods of application for caesarean section.Comparisons of interest in this review were between different antiseptic agents used for CS skin preparation (e.g. alcohol, povidone iodine), different methods of antiseptic application (e.g. scrub, paint, drape), different forms of antiseptic (e.g. powder, liquid), and also between different skin preparations, such as a plastic incisional drape, which may or may not be impregnated with antiseptic agents.Only studies involving the preparation of the incision area were included. This review did not cover studies of preoperative handwashing by the surgical team or preoperative bathing.. Three review authors independently assessed all potential studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias, and extracted the data using a predesigned form. We checked data for accuracy. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.. For this update, we included 11 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with a total of 6237 women who were undergoing CS. Ten trials (6215 women) contributed data to this review. All included studies were individual RCTs. We did not identify any quasi- or cluster-RCTs. The trial dates ranged from 1983 to 2016. Six trials were conducted in the USA, and the remainder in Nigeria, South Africa, France, Denmark, and Indonesia.The included studies were broadly methodologically sound, but raised some specific concerns regarding risk of bias in a number of cases.Drape versus no drapeThis comparison investigated the use of a non-impregnated drape versus no drape, following preparation of the skin with antiseptics. For women undergoing CS, low-quality evidence suggested that using a drape before surgery compared with no drape, may make little or no difference to the incidence of surgical site infection (risk ratio (RR) 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 1.71; 2 trials, 1294 women), or length of stay in the hospital (mean difference (MD) 0.10 day, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.46 1 trial, 603 women).One-minute alcohol scrub with iodophor drape versus five-minute iodophor scrub without drapeOne trial compared an alcohol scrub and iodophor drape with a five-minute iodophor scrub only, and reported no surgical site infection in either group (79 women, very-low quality evidence). We were uncertain whether the combination of a one-minute alcohol scrub and a drape reduced the incidence of endomyometritis when compared with a five-minute scrub, because the quality of the evidence was very low (RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.29 to 9.16; 1 trial, 79 women).Parachlorometaxylenol with iodine versus iodine aloneWe were uncertain whether parachlorometaxylenol with iodine before CS made any difference to the incidence of surgical site infection (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.99; 1 trial, 50 women), or endometritis (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.38; 1 trial, 50 women) when compared with iodine alone, because the quality of the evidence was very low.Chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodineLow-quality evidence suggested that chlorhexidine gluconate before CS, when compared with povidone iodine, may make little or no difference to the incidence of surgical site infection (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.02; 6 trials, 3607 women). However, surgical site infection appeared to be slightly reduced for women for whom chlorhexidine gluconate was used compared with povidone iodine after we removed four trials at high. There was insufficient evidence available from the included RCTs to fully evaluate different agents and methods of skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section. Therefore, it is not yet clear what sort of skin preparation may be most effective for preventing postcaesarean surgical site infection, or for reducing other undesirable outcomes for mother and baby.Most of the evidence in this review was deemed to be very low or low quality. This means that for most findings, our confidence in any evidence of an intervention effect is limited, and indicates the need for more high-quality research.This field needs high quality, well designed RCTs, with larger sample sizes. High priority questions include comparing types of antiseptic (especially iodine versus chlorhexidine), and application methods (scrubbing, swabbing, or draping). We found four studies that were ongoing; we will incorporate the results of these studies in future updates of this review.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Bandages; Cesarean Section; Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Ethanol; Female; Humans; Iodine; Iodophors; Length of Stay; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surgical Drapes; Surgical Wound Infection; Xylenes

Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by obstetricians. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery can have a tremendous impact on the postpartum woman's return to normal function and her ability to care for her baby. Despite the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, postoperative infectious morbidity still complicates cesarean deliveries.. To determine if cleansing the vagina with an antiseptic solution before a cesarean delivery decreases the risk of maternal infectious morbidities, including endometritis and wound complications.. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (21 July 2014).. We included randomized and quasi-randomized trials assessing the impact of vaginal cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery with any type of antiseptic solution versus a placebo solution/standard of care on post-cesarean infectious morbidity.. We independently assessed eligibility and quality of the studies.. Five trials randomizing 1946 women (1766 analyzed) evaluated the effects of vaginal cleansing (all with povidone-iodine) on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. The risk of bias was generally low, with the quality of most of the studies being high. Vaginal preparation immediately before cesarean delivery significantly reduced the incidence of post-cesarean endometritis from 7.2% in control groups to 3.6% in vaginal cleansing groups (average risk ratio (RR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.97, five trials, 1766 women). The risk reduction was particularly strong for women with ruptured membranes (1.4% in the vaginal cleansing group versus 15.4% in the control group; RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.66, two trials, 148 women). No other outcomes realized statistically significant differences between the vaginal cleansing and control groups. No adverse effects were reported with the povidone-iodine vaginal cleansing.The quality of the evidence using GRADE was low for post-cesarean endometritis, moderate for postoperative fever, and low for wound infection.. Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution immediately before cesarean delivery reduces the risk of postoperative endometritis. This benefit is particularly realized for women undergoing cesarean delivery with ruptured membranes. As a simple, generally inexpensive intervention, providers should consider implementing preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine before performing cesarean deliveries.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Disinfection; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surgical Wound Infection; Vagina

Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by obstetricians. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery can have a tremendous impact on the postpartum woman's return to normal function and her ability to care for her baby. Despite the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, postoperative infectious morbidity still complicates cesarean deliveries.. To determine if cleansing the vagina with an antiseptic solution before a cesarean delivery decreases the risk of maternal infectious morbidities, including endometritis and wound complications.. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (10 December 2014).. We included randomized and quasi-randomized trials assessing the impact of vaginal cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery with any type of antiseptic solution versus a placebo solution/standard of care on post-cesarean infectious morbidity.. We independently assessed eligibility and quality of the studies.. Seven trials randomizing 2816 women (2635 analyzed) evaluated the effects of vaginal cleansing (all with povidone-iodine) on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. The risk of bias was generally low, with the quality of most of the studies being high. Vaginal preparation immediately before cesarean delivery significantly reduced the incidence of post-cesarean endometritis from 8.3% in control groups to 4.3% in vaginal cleansing groups (average risk ratio (RR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 0.81, seven trials, 2635 women). The risk reduction was particularly strong for women who were already in labor at the time of the cesarean delivery (7.4% in the vaginal cleansing group versus 13.0% in the control group; RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.95, three trials, 523 women) and for women with ruptured membranes (4.3% in the vaginal cleansing group versus 17.9% in the control group; RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.55, three trials, 272 women). No other outcomes realized statistically significant differences between the vaginal cleansing and control groups. No adverse effects were reported with the povidone-iodine vaginal cleansing.The quality of the evidence using GRADE was low for post-cesarean endometritis, moderate for postoperative fever, and low for wound infection.. Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution immediately before cesarean delivery reduces the risk of postoperative endometritis. This benefit is particularly realized for women undergoing cesarean delivery, who are already in labor or who have ruptured membranes. As a simple, generally inexpensive intervention, providers should consider implementing preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine before performing cesarean deliveries.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Disinfection; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surgical Wound Infection; Vagina

Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by obstetricians. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery can have a tremendous impact on the postpartum woman's return to normal function and her ability to care for her baby. Despite the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, postoperative infectious morbidity still complicates cesarean deliveries.. To determine if cleansing the vagina with an antiseptic solution before a cesarean delivery decreases the risk of maternal infectious morbidities, including endometritis and wound complications.. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (8 August 2012).. We included randomized and quasi-randomized trials assessing the impact of vaginal cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery with any type of antiseptic solution versus a placebo solution/standard of care on post-cesarean infectious morbidity.. We independently assessed eligibility and quality of the studies.. Five trials randomizing 1946 women (1766 analyzed) evaluated the effects of vaginal cleansing (all with povidone-iodine) on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. The risk of bias was generally low, with the quality of most of the studies being high. Vaginal preparation immediately before cesarean delivery significantly reduced the incidence of post-cesarean endometritis from 7.2% in control groups to 3.6% in vaginal cleansing groups (average risk ratio (RR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.97, five trials, 1766 women). The risk reduction was particularly strong for women with ruptured membranes (1.4% in the vaginal cleansing group versus 15.4% in the control group; RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.66, two trials, 148 women). No other outcomes realized statistically significant differences between the vaginal cleansing and control groups. No adverse effects were reported with the povidone-iodine vaginal cleansing.. Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution immediately before cesarean delivery reduces the risk of postoperative endometritis. This benefit is particularly realized for women undergoing cesarean delivery with ruptured membranes. As a simple, generally inexpensive intervention, providers should consider implementing preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine before performing cesarean deliveries.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Disinfection; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surgical Wound Infection; Vagina

Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by obstetricians. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery can have a tremendous impact on the postpartum woman's return to normal function and her ability to care for her baby. Despite the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, postoperative infectious morbidity still complicates cesarean deliveries.. To determine if cleansing the vagina with an antiseptic solution before a cesarean delivery decreases the risk of maternal infectious morbidities, including endometritis and wound complications.. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (December 2009).. We included randomized trials assessing the impact of vaginal cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery with any type of antiseptic solution versus a placebo solution/standard of care on post-cesarean infectious morbidity.. We independently assessed eligibility and quality of the studies.. Four trials (involving 1361 randomized and 1198 analyzed women) evaluated the effects of vaginal cleansing (all with povidone-iodine) on post-cesarean infectious morbidity. The risk of bias was generally low, with the quality of most of the studies being high. Vaginal preparation immediately before cesarean delivery significantly reduced the incidence of post-cesarean endometritis from 9.4% in control groups to 5.2% in vaginal cleansing groups (risk ratio (RR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 0.87, four trials, 1198 women). The risk reduction was particularly strong for women with ruptured membranes (1.4% in the vaginal cleansing group versus 15.4% in the control group; RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.66, two trials, 148 women). No other outcomes realized statistically significant differences between the vaginal cleansing and control groups. No adverse effects were reported with the povidone-iodine vaginal cleansing.. Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution immediately before cesarean delivery reduces the risk of postoperative endometritis. This benefit is particularly realized for women undergoing cesarean delivery with ruptured membranes. As a simple, generally inexpensive intervention, providers should consider implementing preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine before performing cesarean deliveries.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Disinfection; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Surgical Wound Infection; Vagina

Despite the use of prophylactic antibiotics during Caesarean delivery, post-Caesarean surgical site infection (SSI) and endometritis still often complicate the puerperal period. We speculated that the use of vaginal cleansing with chlorhexidine solution would serve as an adjunct to prophylactic antibiotics in reducing the menace of post-caesarean endometritis and indeed found a significant reduction.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Nigeria; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Tertiary Care Centers

Cesarean delivery is the most performed major surgery among women, and surgical-site infections following a cesarean delivery are a significant source of postoperative morbidity. It is unclear if vaginal cleansing before a cesarean delivery decreases post-cesarean delivery infectious morbidity.. This study aimed to evaluate if preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine among women undergoing a cesarean delivery after labor decreases postoperative infectious morbidity.. This randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 3, 2015 to January 28, 2021, with 30 days of follow-up and the final follow-up completed on February 27, 2021. Patients met the inclusion criteria if they underwent a cesarean delivery after regular contractions with cervical dilation, rupture of membranes, or any cesarean delivery performed at >4 cm dilation. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either abdominal cleansing plus vaginal cleansing with 1% povidone-iodine or abdominal cleansing alone. The primary outcome was composite infectious morbidity including surgical-site infection, fever, endometritis, and wound complications within 30 days after the cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the composite, length of hospital stay, postoperative hospitalization or outpatient treatment related to infectious morbidity, and empirical treatment for neonatal sepsis.. A total of 608 subjects (304 vaginal cleansing group, 304 control group) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. There was no significant difference in the primary composite outcome between the 2 groups (11.8% vs 11.5%; P=.90; relative risk, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.6). Individual components of the composite and secondary outcomes were also not significantly different between the groups. Similar findings were observed in the as-treated analysis (11.3% vs 11.8%; P=.9; relative risk, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.6).. Vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine before an unscheduled cesarean delivery occurring after labor did not reduce the postoperative infectious morbidity. These findings do not support the routine use of vaginal cleansing for women undergoing a cesarean delivery after labor.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Surgical Wound Infection; Vagina

XXX OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to demonstrate that vaginal cleansing with a 4% chlorhexidine solution before cesarean delivery in patients with a history of rupture of membranes prevents postoperative infectious complications (endometritis, surgical site infections).. A total of 204 patients with premature rupture of membranes or who were in labor for more than 6 hours after membranes ruptured were randomized before a cesarean delivery to preoperative vaginal cleansing with a chlorhexidine solution (n=97 patients) or to placebo cleansing with saline solution (n=107 patients). The management of the rupture of membranes and the cesarean delivery procedure were conducted according to standard local protocols for both groups, including the use of antibiotics.. Vaginal cleansing with chlorhexidine reduced the risk for endometritis after cesarean delivery in patients with rupture of membranes when compared with placebo cleansing (chlorhexidine, 7.21% vs placebo, 18.8%; relative risk, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.87; P=.015). Likewise, there was a statistically significant reduction in the number of cases of puerperal fever (chlorhexidine, 9.28% vs placebo, 19.8%; relative risk, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.98; P=.037). There was a statistical difference between the groups in prolongation of hospitalization for >72 hours (chlorhexidine, 1.03% vs placebo, 7.55%; relative risk, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-1.08; P=.02), although the confidence interval suggests that the effect was by chance. There were no statistical differences in surgical site infection at 7 days (chlorhexidine, 1.03% vs placebo, 0.94%; relative risk, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-17.4; P=.94) and 15 days after the procedure (chlorhexidine, 1.03% vs placebo, 0%; relative risk, 3.31 [using a continuity correction]; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-80.21; P=.29).. The use of chlorhexidine for vaginal cleansing before a cesarean delivery in patients with rupture of membranes reduced the risk for endometritis and puerperal fever. It also reduced the number of cases that required hospitalization for more than 3 days, but the confidence interval suggests that it could be by chance. It has no effect on the number of cases with surgical site infection.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Puerperal Infection; Surgical Wound Infection

Globally, peripartum or puerperal infections account for about one tenth of maternal mortality, most of which occur in low income countries. Therefore, vaginal preparation with an antiseptic prior to a caesarean delivery could be considered an additional measure to prevent subsequent infectious morbidities.. To evaluate vaginal preparation with 0.3% chlorhexidine solution in the prevention of endometritis, surgical site infection and post-operative fever following emergency caesarean section.. This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted among 240 participants planned for emergency caesarean sections (CS) at term in the University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital Complex, Ondo State, Nigeria. Participants were randomised into either group "A" (study) or "B" (control). The former had vaginal preparation with 0.3% chlorhexidine gluconate immediately after anaesthesia while the latter received normal saline. Participants were followed up post-operatively during which clinical features of puerperal infectious morbidities were observed for each during admission as well as 8th and 14th days after delivery.. The rate and risk of endometritis were significantly lower in the study group compared to the control; 5.0% versus 13.3%, respectively (chi squared =5.004; p=0.042, RR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.15-0.94; p = 0.042; RRR = 0.62). Post-operative fever and surgical site infection, were also lower in the study group compared to the controls, but the difference was not statistically significant.. When compared to placebo, pre-caesarean section vaginal preparation with 0.3% chlorhexidine solution significantly reduced only the rate and risk of post-operative endometritis among infectious morbidities.. À l’échelle mondiale, infections péripartum ou puerpérales représentent environ un dixième de la mortalité maternelle, dont la plupart se produisent dans les pays à faible revenu. Par conséquent, la préparation vaginale avec un antiseptique avant un accouchement par césarienne pourrait être considéré comme un mesure supplémentaire pour prévenir les morbidités infectieuses subséquentes.. Évaluer la préparation vaginale avec 0.3%solution de chlorhexidine dans la prévention de l’endométrite, site chirurgical infection et fièvre postopératoire après une césarienne d’urgence section.. Cet essai prospectif randomisé contrôlé (ECR)a été menée auprès de 240 participants prévus pour une urgence césariennes (CS) à terme à l’Université des sciences médicales Complexe hospitalier universitaire, État d’Ondo, Nigéria. Les participants étaient randomisé dans le groupe “A” (étude) ou “B” (témoin). Celui-là avait une préparation vaginale avec 0.3 % de gluconate de chlorhexidine immédiatement après l’anesthésie alors que ce dernier a reçu une solution saline normale. Les participants ont été suivis postopératoirement au cours desquels des caractéristiques de morbidité infectieuse puerpérale ont été observées pour chaquelors de l’admission ainsi que les 8ème et 14ème jours après la livraison.. Le taux et le risque d’endométrite étaient significativement plus faibles dans le groupe d’étude par rapport au groupe témoin; 5.0 % contre 13.3 %, respectivement (chi carré =5.004; p=0.042, RR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.15–0.94; p = 0.042; RRR = 0.62). Fièvre postopératoire et infection du site chirurgical, étaient également plus faibles dans le groupe d’étude par rapport aux témoins, mais lela différence n’était pas statistiquement significative.. Par rapport au placebo, pré-césarienne préparation vaginale avec une solution de chlorhexidine à 0.3% significativement réduit uniquement le taux et le risque d’endométrite postopératoire chez morbidités infectieuses.. Chlorhexidine, Préparation Vaginale, Infection Puerpéral emorbidité, Césarienne, Endométrite, Fièvre Postopératoire, Infection Du Site Chirurgical.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Cesarean Section; Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Morbidity; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Puerperal Infection; Surgical Wound Infection

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of vaginal disinfection using 10 % povidone-iodine on rates of endometritis from post-caesarean infectious diseases before elective caesarean section (CS).. A total of 270 pregnant women who chose to undergo elective CS were recruited for this prospective randomised controlled study. The experimental group comprised 130 patients who had preoperatively undergone vaginal disinfection with 10 % povidone-iodine for 30 s. The control group consisted of 140 patients who had not undergone any vaginal implication before CS. The primary outcome measure was the rate of postpartum endometritis for each group. Intraoperatively, all patients who had closed uterine cervical canals underwent a digital opening of the internal and external cervical canal to equalise the groups. All of the participants were checked for endometritis one week after CS at the hospital. Additionally, for the week before and after surgery, C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) values were assessed for both groups. Ethics committee approval number: 339. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 3.5.1 (R statistical Software, Institute for Statistics and Mathematics, Vienna, Austria).. The groups were balanced in terms of the patients' demographic characteristics. There were no significant differences between the two groups according to endometritis rates: 4.6 % in the study group versus 6.4 % in the control group (p > 0.05). The CRP and WBC values before CS were similar in both groups. In the study group, the CRPand WBC values after CS were lower, whereas they were higher in the control group after CS; these differences were significant (p = 0.01 for CRP and p = 0.001 for WBC).. Vaginal disinfection with povidone-iodine solution 10 % before elective CS does not significantly reduce post-caesarean endometritis rates; however, it does significantly reduce inflammatory markers such as CRP and WBC.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; C-Reactive Protein; Cesarean Section; Disinfection; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Inflammation; Leukocyte Count; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Prospective Studies; Vagina

Precesarean vaginal preparation significantly reduces postpartum infections. Although povidone-iodine is the most commonly used vaginal antiseptic, evidence suggests that chlorhexidine gluconate may be more effective.. We aimed to compare the bactericidal effect of chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone-iodine on vaginal bacterial colony counts in pregnancy.. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial of vaginal preparation with 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate vs 10% povidone-iodine vs saline in women undergoing cesarean delivery at ≥34 weeks' gestation. Women in labor or those with ruptured membranes, chorioamnionitis, abnormal placentation, or allergy to study agents were excluded. Vaginal specimens were collected aseptically in the operating room immediately before and 5-10 minutes after vaginal cleansing with 3 sterile sponge sticks. Our primary outcome was postintervention aerobic and anaerobic bacterial colony counts, assessed by blinded investigators. Two-way analysis of variance with simple-effects analysis and Tukey post hoc test were used for multiple group comparisons. Secondary outcomes included baseline colony counts, change in colony counts, adverse events, and maternal infections.. A total of 29 women consented and underwent vaginal preparation with chlorhexidine gluconate (n=10), povidone-iodine (n=9), or saline (n=10). Groups were similar with respect to maternal age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, parity, group B streptococcus status, and gestational age. There were no differences in baseline colony counts. Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine resulted in lower aerobic and anaerobic colony counts compared with chlorhexidine gluconate and saline (P≤.01 and P≤.0001, respectively). Povidone-iodine eliminated more than 99.9% of bacteria, whereas chlorhexidine gluconate and saline eliminated more than 99% and 95% of bacteria, respectively. Although all agents decreased aerobic and anaerobic bacterial counts, 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate was no more effective than saline in reducing anaerobic bacteria. There were no reported adverse effects or postpartum infections.. Compared with 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate, 10% povidone-iodine was more effective in reducing vaginal bacterial colony counts before cesarean delivery.

Topics: Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Surgical Wound Infection

To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative vaginal cleansing using povidone-iodine solution 10% on rates of post cesarean section (CS) infectious morbidities (endometritis, febrile morbidity and wound infection).. This prospective randomized trial was conducted among 226 pregnant women scheduled for term elective CS. Patients were equally divided into two groups by simple randomization method. The study group had preoperative vaginal cleansing using povidone-iodine solution 10% for about 1 min, while the control group did not. All cases received the prophylactic antibiotics and the usual abdominal scrub. Adverse post CS infectious morbidities such as endometritis, febrile morbidity and wound infection were observed at the time of hospital discharge and weekly for 6 weeks postpartum.. Both groups were matched regarding the baseline patients' characteristics. Overall, post-CS infectious morbidity was significantly reduced from 20.7% in the control group to 7.5% in the intervention group. Marked significant reduction was seen in the incidence of endometritis (11.8% in the control group versus 2.8% in the intervention group). However, maternal fever and wound infection showed no significant difference between both groups.. Vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine solution 10% prior to elective CS appears to be effective in reducing rates of post-CS infectious morbidity mainly endometritis.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Disinfection; Endometritis; Female; Fever; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Surgical Wound Infection; Vagina

To evaluate the association of institutional protocols for vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution and the surgical site infection rate in women undergoing cesarean delivery during labor.. This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for cesarean delivery performed in laboring patients with viable pregnancies. The primary outcome for this analysis was the rate of superficial or deep surgical site infection within 6 weeks postpartum, as per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Maternal secondary outcomes included a composite of endometritis, wound infection or other infections, postoperative maternal fever, length of hospital stay, and the rates of hospital readmission, unexpected office visits, and emergency department visits.. A total of 523 women delivered in institutions with vaginal antisepsis policies before cesarean delivery and 1,490 delivered in institutions without such policies. There was no difference in superficial and deep surgical site infection rates between women with and without vaginal preparation (5.5% vs 4.1%; odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% CI 0.87-2.17), even after adjusting for possible confounders (adjusted OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.43-1.73). The lack of significant benefit was noted in all other maternal secondary outcomes.. Institutional policies for vaginal preparation before cesarean delivery were not associated with lower rates of surgical site infection in women undergoing cesarean delivery during labor.

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Cesarean Section; Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Labor, Obstetric; Neonatal Sepsis; Odds Ratio; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Streptococcus agalactiae; Surgical Wound Infection; Vagina

Identification of optimal surgical site antisepsis preparations may reduce cesarean-related surgical site infections. Two recently published investigations examined efficacy of chlorhexidine-alcohol and iodine-alcohol preparations. No previous randomized controlled trial has compared chlorhexidine-alcohol to povidone-iodine aqueous scrub and paint in reduction of cesarean-related surgical site infection.. The purpose of the study was to determine if chlorhexidine-alcohol would result in fewer surgical site infections than povidone-iodine when used as skin antisepsis preparation prior to cesarean delivery.. This study was a single-center pragmatic randomized controlled trial at an urban tertiary care institution to compare chlorhexidine-alcohol 26-mL single-step applicator to povidone-iodine aqueous scrub and paint 236-mL wet skin tray as preoperative skin antiseptic preparation for women undergoing cesarean delivery. Patients were eligible for study participation if they could provide informed consent in English or Spanish, were ≥18 years of age, did not have clinical chorioamnionitis, were unlikely to be lost to follow-up, and had no sensitivities to chlorhexidine, betadine, or iodine. Treatment was assigned by computer-generated simple 1:1 randomization immediately before skin preparation. The primary outcome was surgical site infection occurring within 30 days of cesarean delivery including ≥1 of: superficial or deep surgical site infection, or endometritis, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Analysis was by intent to treat. Categorical outcomes were compared using Fisher exact test. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed for continuous outcomes. This trial was institutional review board approved and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02202577).. In all, 932 subjects (461 assigned to chlorhexidine-alcohol, 471 assigned to povidone-iodine) were randomized from February 2013 through May 2016. Rate of follow-up evaluation after 30 days was 99% (455) in the chlorhexidine-alcohol group and 97% (455) in the povidone-iodine group. Surgical site infection occurred in 29 (6.3%) of the chlorhexidine-alcohol group and 33 (7.0%) in the povidone-iodine group (P = .38). The rates of individual components of the primary outcome were as follows: superficial surgical site infection (4.6% v 5.5%; P = .55), deep surgical site infection (0.0% v 0.4%; P = .50), and endometritis (1.7% v 1.1%; P = .42) in chlorhexidine-alcohol vs povidone-iodine arms, respectively. All results were similar in per protocol analysis.. Preoperative antiseptic skin preparation with chlorhexidine-alcohol 26-mL single-step applicator before cesarean did not result in less frequent surgical site infection when compared with povidone-iodine aqueous scrub and paint 236-mL wet skin preparation tray. Povidone-iodine should still be considered as acceptable for preoperative surgical site antisepsis for cesarean delivery.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Surgical Wound Infection; Young Adult

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine prior to caesarean delivery decreased the incidence of postpartum endometritis.. The present study was a prospective randomized controlled trial in which subjects received a vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution immediately prior to caesarean delivery or received no vaginal preparation. The primary outcome measure was the rate of postpartum endometritis.. A significant decrease in post-caesarean endometritis was noted in the group that received the povidone-iodine vaginal preparation (n = 334) compared with the control group (n = 336) [6.9 vs. 11.6%; RR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.03-2.76]. No statistically significant differences in the incidence of endometritis were noted between the experimental and control groups among women who were not in labor at the time of the caesarean delivery [9.2 vs. 8.6%; RR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.58-1.90], and no differences were found between groups when women with ruptured membranes were excluded from the analysis [9.6 vs. 6.7%; RR = 1.39; 95% CI = 0.78-2.47].. Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution immediately prior to a caesarean delivery reduces the risk of post-operative endometritis. This preemptive measure was only found to be beneficial in women whose membranes had ruptured and those who were in labor prior to caesarean surgery.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Adult; Algorithms; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Preoperative Care; Risk Factors; Surgical Wound Infection; Vaginal Douching; Young Adult

The commonest complication associated with caesarean section is infection. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine on post-caesarean infection. In this clinical trial, 568 patients were selected for two groups: a treatment group and a control group, each with 284 patients. A vaginal scrub was performed before the routine abdominal scrub, with two 4 × 4 cm sponge sticks saturated with povidone-iodine solution, rotated in the vagina for about 30 s. In the control group, only the abdominal scrub was performed. Patients received a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics, and were reviewed for 6 weeks to look for predefined variables. Post-caesarean endometritis occurred less frequently in the treatment group than in the control group (2.5% vs 1.4%). There was no significant difference for febrile morbidity and wound infection in the two groups. The adjusted odds ratio for endometritis after vaginal preparation was 0.03 (95% CI: 0.008-0.7). Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine may decrease the risk of post-caesarean endometritis.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Surgical Wound Infection; Young Adult

The objective of the study was to determine whether vaginal preparation with povidone iodine before cesarean delivery decreased the risk of postoperative maternal morbidities.. The design of the study was a randomized, controlled trial in women undergoing cesarean delivery with subjects assigned to have a preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone iodine or to a standard care group (no vaginal wash). The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative fever, endometritis, sepsis, readmission, wound infection, or complication.. There were 155 vaginal cleansing subjects and 145 control subjects. Overall, 9.0% developed the composite outcome, with fewer women in the cleansing group (6.5%) compared with the control group (11.7%), although the difference was not statistically significant (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-1.11; P = .11). Length of surgery, being in labor, and having a dilated cervix were all associated with the composite morbidity outcome.. Vaginal cleansing with povidone iodine before cesarean delivery may decrease postoperative morbidities, although the reduction is not statistically significant.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Endometritis; Female; Fever; Gravidity; Humans; Labor Stage, First; Labor, Obstetric; Parity; Patient Readmission; Postoperative Complications; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Sepsis; Surgical Stapling; Surgical Wound Infection; Sutures; Vagina

Postcesarean endometritis and wound infection remain significant morbidities, despite use of strategies to prevent these complications. We investigated the effect of preoperative vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine as a preventive intervention against postcesarean endometritis and wound infection.. A randomized controlled study was performed in 308 women undergoing nonemergent cesarean delivery. Subjects received either standard abdominal scrub alone or abdominal scrub with an additional vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution. All subjects received prophylactic antibiotic at the time of umbilical cord clamping. Each subject's postoperative course was reviewed for development of febrile morbidity (temperature > 38.0 degrees C), endometritis (temperature > 38.4 degrees C accompanied by fundal tenderness occurring beyond the first postoperative day, in the absence of evidence of other infection), and wound infection.. Postcesarean endometritis occurred in 7.0% of subjects who received a preoperative vaginal preparation and 14.5% of controls (P < .05). There was no measurable effect of a vaginal scrub on the development of postoperative fever or wound infection. The adjusted odds ratio for developing endometritis after a vaginal preparation was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.193-0.997). Multivariate analysis showed an increased risk of developing endometritis in association with severe anemia (adjusted OR 4.26, 95% CI 1.568-11.582), use of intrapartum internal monitors (adjusted OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.311-6.136), or history of antenatal genitourinary infection (adjusted OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.265-6.596).. Preoperative vaginal scrub with povidone-iodine decreases the incidence of postcesarean endometritis. This intervention does not seem to decrease the overall risk of postoperative fever or wound infection.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Elective Surgical Procedures; Endometritis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Incidence; Logistic Models; Multivariate Analysis; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Reference Values; Risk Assessment; Surgical Wound Infection

To determine whether vaginal preparation with povidone iodine before cesarean decreased the incidence of postpartum infectious morbidity.. Participants were randomly assigned to vaginal preparation with povidone iodine (n = 247) or no preparation (n = 251). Postpartum infectious morbidity included fever, defined as temperature of 38C or greater after the day of surgery; endometritis, defined as fever with abdominal or uterine tenderness and initiation of intravenous antibiotics; and wound separation, defined as disruption of the abdominal incision that required wound care. We calculated overall rates of postpartum infectious morbidity, relative risks (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the effect of vaginal preparation. As designed and reported, the trial had at least 80% power to detect a 10% or greater absolute difference in rates of overall infectious morbidity, fever, and endometritis (two-tailed, alpha = 0.05).. There was no difference between groups in maternal age, parity, race, education, prior cesarean, type of anesthesia, labor before current cesarean, number of vaginal examinations during labor, internal monitoring, prophylactic antibiotic use, gestational age at delivery, or payment status. Excluding 68 women with chorioamnionitis, incidence of postoperative fever was 19.3%, endometritis 7.2%, and wound separation 7.0%. Vaginal preparation with povidone iodine before cesarean had no effect on risk for fever (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8, 1.6), endometritis (RR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8, 3.1), or wound separation (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3, 1.3).. Vaginal preparation with povidone iodine before cesarean had no effect on the incidence of fever, endometritis, or wound infection.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Prospective Studies; Surgical Wound Dehiscence

To determine the impact of two skin preparation methods and two techniques of pelvic irrigation on the incidence of post-cesarean endometritis and wound infection in an indigent patient population.. A randomized study was performed in 100 cesarean patients. Subjects were assigned to one of four groups, involving either standard skin preparation (povidone-iodine [7.5%] scrub followed by povidone-iodine [10%] solution) or special skin preparation (5-minute scrub with parachlorometaxylenol followed by povidone scrub and solution), and either normal saline or antibiotic (cefazolin sodium, 1 g in 500 mL normal saline) irrigation of the pelvis and subcutaneous tissue at uterine and fascial closure. Four groups of patients were formed: standard skin preparation plus normal saline irrigation, standard preparation plus antibiotic irrigation, special preparation plus normal saline irrigation, and special preparation plus antibiotic irrigation.. Endometritis occurred significantly more often in the combined groups that did not include antibiotic irrigation than in the combined groups involving antibiotic irrigation (P < .001). In contrast, comparison of skin preparation methods between povidone-iodine alone versus preparation including parachlorometaxylenol indicated no significant difference (P = .22).. Skin preparation with an antibacterial scrub in addition to standard povidone-iodine scrub and solution does not appear to play as significant a role in the reduction of post-cesarean endometritis or wound infection as does intraoperative pelvic irrigation with antibiotic solution.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cefazolin; Cesarean Section; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Intraoperative Care; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Premedication; Risk Factors; Surgical Wound Infection; Therapeutic Irrigation; Xylenes

This study aimed to assess the in vitro antimicrobial effects of chlorhexidine (CHX) and povidone-iodine (PI) on clinical isolates of Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Trueperella pyogenes (T. pyogenes) from the vaginal discharge of dairy cows, as well as to compare the cytotoxicity effects of CHX and PI on bovine endometrial epithelial cells (BEnEpC). In Experiment 1, 12 E. coli and 10 T. pyogenes were isolated from the vaginal discharge of cows with a uterine infection. The MIC and MBC against CHX and PI were analyzed in vitro. In Experiment 2, the cytotoxicity effects of CHX and PI on BEnEpC were analyzed using a Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit, wound scratch healing assay, and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine genes (IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α). In Experiment 1, the MIC and MBC values of CHX against E. coli were 0.0002% and 0.0002 to 0.00025%, respectively. The MIC and MBC values of PI were 1.25 to 2.5% and 1.25 to 5%, respectively. For T. pyogenes, the MIC and MBC values of CHX were 0.00002%. The MIC and MBC values of PI were 1.25%. In Experiment 2, the cell viability significantly decreased, and wound closures were significantly inhibited after treatment with ≥ 0.002% CHX and ≥ 0.025% PI. The expression of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α significantly increased after treatment with PI. Only IL-6 showed a significant increase after cells were treated with 0.00002% and 0.0002% CHX. The results suggested that both CHX and PI had high antibacterial effects. However, veterinarians and farmers should be aware of their cytotoxicity, which decrease viability of endometrial epithelial cells and inhibit wound healing in vitro.

Topics: Actinomycetaceae; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cattle; Cattle Diseases; Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Female; Interleukin-6; Interleukin-8; Povidone-Iodine; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Vaginal Discharge

Surgical site infections (SSI, including wound infections, endometritis, pelvic abscess, and sepsis) may complicate cesarean section (C/S). We report outcomes before and after the introduction of an SSI prevention bundle that did not include antibiotics beyond routine prophylaxis (cefazolin, or gentamicin/clindamycin for penicillin-allergic patients).. The prevention bundle was introduced following an increase in C/S-associated SSI, which itself was associated with an institutional switch in preoperative scrub from povidone-iodine to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)/isopropanol. Components of the bundle included: (1) full-body preoperative wash with 4% CHG cloths; (2) retraining on surgeon hand scrub; (3) retraining for surgical prep; and (4) patient education regarding wound care. Patients delivered by C/S at ≥24 weeks of gestation were segregated into four epochs over 7 years: (1) baseline (18 months when povidone-iodine was used); (2) CHG scrub (18 months after skin prep was switched to CHG); (3) bundle implementation (24 months); and (4) maintenance (24 months following implementation).. Implementation of a prevention bundle was associated with a reduction in post-C/S SSI. This improvement was achieved without the use of antibiotics beyond standard preoperative dosing.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Multivariate Analysis; Patient Care Bundles; Patient Education as Topic; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Surgical Wound Infection

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Povidone-Iodine

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Chlorhexidine; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy

This study aimed to describe the duration of inflammation after intrauterine infusion of polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine (povidone-iodine, PVP-I), determine the effect of PVP-I infusion on the subsequent fertility, and evaluate the histopathology of the endometrium in dairy cows. In Experiment 1, 120 lactating clinically healthy Holstein-Friesian cows at 5 weeks postpartum (W5) were equally divided into three groups: intrauterine infusion of 2% PVP-I (PVP), saline (SAL), and no treatment (NTX). Endometrial cytology was performed daily from D0 (W5) to D7 to determine the percentage of polymorphonuclear cells (PMN%) in 44 of the 120 cows. All cows received timed artificial insemination at D17. In Experiment 2, 25 cows were randomly classified into sacrifice at 24 hr or 48 hr after 2% PVP-I infusion (PVP24 and PVP48), and 24, 48, 72, or 96 hr after SAL infusion (SAL24; SAL48; SAL72; SAL96), or no treatment (NTX). Histopathology was performed on the uterus of each cow. In Experiment 1, PMN% was greater in PVP (P<0.05) than in SAL and NTX, on D1, but decreased to a level similar to that of the other groups by D2. Conception rate was higher (P<0.05) in PVP cows compared to SAL and NTX cows. In Experiment 2, stratified columnar epithelium in the uterus disappeared in PVP24 and SAL24. The epithelium was regenerated in PVP48, SAL72, and SAL96, but not in SAL48. In conclusion, the results of the study suggest that PVP-I induces transient uterine inflammation, promotes regeneration of endometrial epithelial cells and improves fertility.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cattle; Cattle Diseases; Dairying; Endometritis; Endometrium; Female; Fertility; Inflammation; Insemination, Artificial; Povidone-Iodine; Uterus

Postoperative infections remain a serious concern after cesarean delivery, the most common major surgical procedure in the United States. Multiple strategies have been proposed to combat this problem, including the addition of azithromycin to the standard preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. However, as obstetricians, we have failed to uniformly adopt precesarean vaginal preparation despite convincing evidence from randomized controlled trials that this technique reduces postoperative rates of endometritis by more than 50%. This reduction is similar to that seen with the addition of azithromycin. Vaginal preparation with povidone-iodine solution may target the same genital pathogens as azithromycin, which are commonly implicated in endometritis, a polymicrobial infection that may be under-addressed by our current antiseptic techniques. A recent review of maternal-fetal medicine fellows' practices at the time of cesarean delivery and recent publications on precesarean vaginal cleansing suggest that this practice has not yet gained hold in the United States.

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Azithromycin; Cesarean Section; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Obstetrics; Postoperative Complications; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Standard of Care; Surgical Wound Infection; Vagina

Endometritis is one of the major diseases causing infertility in the cow. Intrauterine infusion of povidone-iodine (PVP-I) is a common treatment. However, the optimal concentration of PVP-I for treating endometritis effectively remains unknown. We tested concentrations of 2.0% or 0.5% PVP-I for treating clinical endometritis in dairy cattle. In Experiment 1, bacteria isolated from the uterus were incubated with either 2.0% or 0.5% PVP-I, and the numbers of bacterial colonies were counted. In Experiment 2, 18 cows with clinical endometritis were treated with either 2.0% or 0.5% PVP-I (n=9 in each group). Cytology samples and bacteria were collected using a cytobrush on weeks 0 (W0), 1 (W1) and 2 (W2) after treatment. Subsequent reproductive performance was compared between the two groups. In Experiment 1, both concentrations had a similar antiseptic outcome. In Experiment 2, the percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN%) in the endometrial epithelium at W2 in the 2.0% group was significantly lower (P<0.05) than in the 0.5% group, although the PMN% decreased significantly from W0 to W2 (P<0.01) in both groups. Decreases in bacterial infection rates from W0 to W2 were similar in both groups. The first service conception rate was higher, numbers of services per conception were fewer, and time to conception was shorter in the 2.0% group than in the 0.5% group. Thus, an intrauterine infusion of 2.0% PVP-I was better than 0.5% in treating clinical endometritis in these dairy cattle.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cattle; Cattle Diseases; Dairying; Drug Administration Routes; Endometritis; Female; Povidone-Iodine

To determine the effectiveness of pre operative vaginal cleansing with an antiseptic solution to reduce post caesarean infectious morbidity.. An observational case control study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unit-III, Liaquat University Hospital, Hyderabad from February to July 2010. The 100 women in control group received the standard abdominal preparation only, while the 100 subjects in interventional group also received preoperative vaginal cleansing with 10% pyodine along with the usual abdominal scrub. All subjects received prophylactic antibiotic cover during the surgery. Maternal demographics, surgical parameters and infectious outcome were collected and data compiled on a pre-designed proforma and analysis was done using SPSS 15.. The comparison between two groups did not show a significant difference in patient's demographics, labour and surgical variables. Post caesarean endometritis occurred in 1% of case group and 7% of controls (p value: <0.03). There was no measurable effect seen on development of fever and wound infection However, statistically significant reduction in overall composite morbidity i.e. p value: <0.02 and odds ratio 0.335 (CI=0.125-0.896) was seen in patients with vaginal cleansing group when compared with controls.. Preoperative vaginal cleansing with pyodine has reduced post caesarean infectious morbidities.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Case-Control Studies; Cesarean Section; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Pakistan; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Surgical Wound Infection; Vagina; Young Adult

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cesarean Section; Congenital Hypothyroidism; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Povidone-Iodine; Pregnancy; Premedication

The efficacy of either povidone-iodine (Betadine) or dichloroxylenol (Septocid) intrauterine infusions on the treatment of endometritis and/or cervicitis in cows was examined. One hundred and twelve repeat-breeder Holstein cows (aged 3-7 years) were selected for this study. Rectal and vaginal examinations were applied to detect the signs of endometritis and/or cervicitis. Cows were assigned into two groups: the first group (n = 60) was treated with Betadine solution (0.5%) while the second group (n = 52) was given Septocid (0.1%) administered as intrauterine infusion (100-150 ml). Both treatment were repeated at least two times at 7-day intervals and the cows were rechecked. The responding animals were inseminated 10-12 h after oestrus detection using frozen semen from bulls of proven fertility. The success or failure of treatment was evaluated on the basis of the post-treatment conception rate. The relationship of the body weight of cows, the length of the service period (open days) and the number of previous services with the results of treatment with Betadine or Septocid is discussed. The recovery and conception rates obtained after Betadine treatment were better than those obtained after Septocid. Moreover, healthy cows (> or = 500 kg body weight) and those inseminated before post-partum day 180, having no more than 4-7 previous services, responded well to either Betadine or Septocid treatment.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Cattle; Cattle Diseases; Chlorophenols; Endometritis; Female; Fertilization; Povidone-Iodine; Treatment Outcome; Uterine Cervicitis

Metronidazole, an antibiotic with specific activity against anaerobic bacteria, was assessed as a treatment for bovine pyometra. A preliminary experiment with metronidazole-neomycin was followed by an experiment in which metronidazole-ampicillin was compared with povidone iodine. Each treatment was given as a single intrauterine infusion. The success of therapy was judged by clinical examination, bacteriological examination before and after treatment and, in the second experiment, by post treatment reproductive performance. Before treatment 45 of the 84 cows in both experiments were infected with a mixture of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria, 23 cows were infected with aerobes alone and significant bacteria were not isolated from 16 cows. Complete bacteriological and clinical cures were achieved in 23 of 32 cows treated with metronidazole-neomycin, 15 of 32 cows treated with metronidazole-ampicillin and 1 of 20 cows treated with iodine. When only those cows with mixed anaerobe/aerobe infections were considered, complete cures occurred in 12 of 17 cows treated with metronidazole-neomycin, and 11 of 16 cows treated with metronidazole-ampicillin, but none of the 12 cows treated with iodine. Twenty-two of 29 cows treated with metronidazole-ampicillin conceived after treatment (mean 51.4 days), while 9 of 18 cows treated with iodine conceived (mean 58.7 days). Statistically, metronidazole-ampicillin treatment produced significantly better clinical and bacteriological cure rates than iodine treatment (P less than 0.05), but the differences in reproductive parameters were not significant.

Topics: Ampicillin; Animals; Bacterial Infections; Cattle; Cattle Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endometritis; Female; Fertility; Infusions, Parenteral; Metronidazole; Neomycin; Povidone-Iodine

A study was conducted to document the maximum retention times of antimicrobial residues in milk after their use in intrauterine treatment of metritis in lactating cows and to evaluate several risk factors hypothesized to influence the retention time of these drugs. Oxytetracycline (3 g), lincomycin-spectinomycin (2 g of one-third lincomycin and two-thirds spectinomycin), or povidone-iodine (6 g) were given to cows with metritis by intrauterine route. The Bacillus stearothermophilus var calidolactis disk assay was performed on each milk sample. Of the 61 cows treated with oxytetracycline, 30 had residues in their postinjection milk for variable periods (range, 12.5 to 44.0 hours; mean, 26.6 +/- 10.3). Of the 47 cows treated with lincomycin-spectinomycin, 17 had residues in their postinjection milk for various periods (range, 14.5 to 24 hours; mean, 19.5 +/- 8.9). Povidone-iodine was not detected in milk. Because a high number of cows (n = 61) were treated with oxytetracycline, only data from these cows were used in testing the influence of 3 factors (severity of metritis, time after parturition when cows with metritis were treated, and parity) on maximum retention of the drug in milk. Severity of metritis did not have a significant influence (P greater than or equal to 0.1) on the maximum retention time of the drug. The retention time decreased linearly with the increase of time after parturition when the cow with metritis was treated. First lactation cows had a significantly (P less than or equal to 0.01) shorter retention time than did older cows.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cattle; Cattle Diseases; Endometritis; Female; Lincomycin; Milk; Oxytetracycline; Povidone; Povidone-Iodine; Spectinomycin